# Phase 3 Proof Discharge — Quick Start Guide ## What Happened? Round 1 orchestration of Phase 3 proof discharge for the BOB quantum kernel loop invariants formalization (Agda) is **complete**. Three specialized agents (ahmad_bot, forge, enki) analyzed 15 holes across 4 modules and identified critical structural gaps. ## Key Results (60-second summary) | Metric | Value | |--------|-------| | Holes Identified | 15 | | Holes Discharged | 0 | | Spec Gaps Found | 2 (critical) | | Viable Discharges Proposed | 1 | | Agents Deployed | 3 (running in parallel) | ### The Two Critical Issues **1. EvolutionLoop.agda** — Missing semantic contract - **What:** `StepTransition` record lacks `state_valid_preserved` field - **Why:** Quantum evolution must preserve Hilbert space dimension - **Fix:** Add 1 field (~4 lines) - **Impact:** Unblocks 3 holes **2. MatrixAccumulationLoop.agda** — Missing precondition - **What:** `matrix_acc_base` doesn't require `max_terms ≥ 1` - **Why:** RK4 Taylor series needs at least one term - **Fix:** Add 1 parameter (~2 lines) - **Impact:** Unblocks 5 holes ### Viable Discharge Found **EulerLoop.agda line 141:** Lower bound arithmetic proof ready for type-checking. --- ## Where to Find Everything ### Main Reports (in this directory) - **PHASE_3_RESULTS_INDEX.md** ← START HERE (executive summary) - **PHASE_3_ORCHESTRATION_LOG.md** (detailed findings per agent) - **PHASE_3_DISCHARGE_SUMMARY.txt** (full context) ### Supporting Artifacts - `/tmp/PHASE_3_DISCHARGE_REPORT.md` (analysis) - `/tmp/PHASE_3_WORM_ENTRIES.jsonl` (WORM audit trail) ### Source Code Locations **Files that need fixing:** - `src/Invariants/EvolutionLoop.agda` (lines 100–124) - `src/Invariants/MatrixAccumulationLoop.agda` (lines 87–97) **Proposed discharge:** - `src/Invariants/EulerLoop.agda` (line 141) --- ## Next Steps (Priority Order) ### Phase 3.1: Apply Spec Corrections (BLOCKING) **In EvolutionLoop.agda**, add to `StepTransition` record (after `time_advances` field): ```agda state_valid_preserved : isValidDim (EvolutionState.state s) → isValidDim (EvolutionState.state s') ``` **In MatrixAccumulationLoop.agda**, modify `matrix_acc_base` signature: ```agda matrix_acc_base : (s : MatrixAccLoopState) → MatrixAccLoopState.k s ≡ 1 → MatrixAccContext.dt (MatrixAccLoopState.ctx s) > 0 → MatrixAccContext.state_dim (MatrixAccLoopState.ctx s) ≥ 1 → MatrixAccLoopState.factorial_k s ≡ 1 → MatrixAccLoopState.term_coefficient s ≡ MatrixAccContext.dt (MatrixAccLoopState.ctx s) → MatrixAccLoopState.num_hamiltonian_sweeps s ≡ 0 → MatrixAccLoopState.exp_matrix_accumulated s ≡ MatrixAccContext.state_dim (MatrixAccLoopState.ctx s) * MatrixAccContext.state_dim (MatrixAccLoopState.ctx s) → MatrixAccLoopState.error_status s ≡ 0 → MatrixAccContext.max_terms (MatrixAccLoopState.ctx s) ≥ 1 → -- ADD THIS LINE MatrixAccInvariant s 1 ``` Then in `matrix_acc_base` body, replace line 101: ```agda { h_k_valid = h_max_terms_pos -- Changed from: ? ``` ### Phase 3.2: Re-run Discharge (After fixes) 1. Run agents on fixed code: - ahmad_bot → EvolutionLoop holes (retry) - enki → MatrixAccumulationLoop hole 101 (retry) - forge → EulerLoop line 141 (verify proposed proof) 2. Type-check proposed discharges via `lake build` 3. WORM-seal successful proofs ### Phase 3.3: Analyze Remaining Modules - GateApplicationLoop.agda (4 holes) — not yet analyzed - Expected: Similar precondition patterns --- ## Technical Context ### The Formalization This is a Phase 2→3 progression of BOB's quantum kernel loop invariants in Agda: - **Phase 2** (completed): Defined 4 loop invariant structures + predicates - **Phase 3** (in progress): Discharge 15 proof holes to validate invariants ### The Holes All 15 holes are placeholder `?` marks in proof terms. They represent: - 3 base-case proofs (induction start) - 5 inductive-step proofs (state preservation) - 4 exit-condition proofs (postconditions) - 3 auxiliary arithmetic proofs ### The Agents - **ahmad_bot:** Specializes in state evolution & bookkeeping (EvolutionLoop) - **forge:** Specializes in numerical updates & bounds (EulerLoop) - **enki:** Specializes in matrix algebra & Taylor series (MatrixAccumulationLoop) --- ## Why This Matters The formalization bridges informal C/Fortran implementation and formal specification. The two spec gaps that surfaced are **semantic invariants** that the implementation silently assumes but the formalization must make explicit: 1. **Dimension Preservation:** Quantum evolution respects the structure of the state space (core physics) 2. **Taylor Series Bounds:** RK4 requires minimum 1 term (integration contract) These aren't bugs—they're **correctness requirements** that formal verification makes visible. --- ## Questions? See **PHASE_3_RESULTS_INDEX.md** for: - Full technical details (predicate definitions, record structures) - Per-agent findings and recommendations - Complete hole inventory with status - Phase 3 roadmap (Phases 3.1–3.4) --- **Status:** Ready for Phase 3.1 spec corrections **Estimated time to completion:** 2–4 hours (after fixes applied) **Next checkpoint:** Phase 3.2 (Round 2 discharge verification)