--- license: apache-2.0 library_name: laya pipeline_tag: text-classification base_model: convaiinnovations/laya datasets: - allenai/WildChat-1M language: [en, de, fr, es, it, pt, nl, pl, tr, ru, ar, zh, ja, ko] tags: [routing, llm-routing, model-selection, prompt-difficulty, laya, system-one, calibrated-decisions, multilingual] --- # Raya — a fast multilingual LLM router (Laya fine-tune) **Raya picks which model tier should answer a prompt — a small fast model, a mid-tier model, or a frontier model — in one ~17 ms forward pass, about 20× faster than a hosted routing API.** - **Robust to how you phrase the routing question.** Raya scores 80–81% on all three question styles we tested. On the difficulty-score style it beats TypeSafe Jev by ~10 points (**80.3% vs 70.5%**, paired McNemar p < 0.001). - **Matches or beats Jev on the minimal routing question in Japanese (90 vs 87), Polish (86 vs 83), Spanish (87 vs 85), German (74 vs 72), English (86 vs 86), and Arabic (73 vs 73).** - **Open and self-hostable.** A 300M-parameter model with no per-call cost, served through Laya's Jev-compatible HTTP API. Raya is [Laya](https://huggingface.co/convaiinnovations/laya)'s multilingual decision model (mmBERT-base encoder), fine-tuned end-to-end for 3-tier routing. It is not affiliated with Convai Innovations or TypeSafe. ## Quick start ```python import laya # pip install laya (Raya was built and tested with laya 0.3.7) raya = laya.Agent("TextCortex/raya", device="cuda") # or "mps" / "cpu" ROUTE = { "type": "choice", "instructions": "Route this prompt to a model.", "criteria": { "small_model": "simple requests", "medium_model": "moderately complex requests", "frontier_model": "very hard requests", }, } out = raya.system_one({"prompt": "Schreibe eine professionelle E-Mail an einen Kunden …"}, {"route": ROUTE}) print(out["answers"]["route"]) # {'choice': 'medium_model', 'probabilities': {'small_model': 0.24, 'medium_model': 0.74, 'frontier_model': 0.03}, ...} ``` Raya was trained on three routing questions: the minimal choice above, a detailed rubric choice, and a 3-level difficulty score. Use one of those. Option order does not matter because options were shuffled in training. Raya serves through Laya's Jev-compatible HTTP server (`POST /v1/systemone`). ## Benchmark: 3-tier routing on real multilingual prompts **Test set.** 563 first-turn prompts from WildChat-1M (shards never used for training), 14 languages, ~40 per language, 75% natural traffic + 25% hard-leaning. Gold tier = the tier two independent blind annotators (Claude Opus and Claude Sonnet, same written rubric) **both** assigned; the annotators agree on 78% of prompts, which is the practical ceiling. Tier mix: 225 small / 317 medium / 21 frontier. | Question style | Raya | TypeSafe Jev 1.13 | Laya 0.3.7 (stock) | Von 1.1 (stock) | |---|---|---|---|---| | Difficulty score (3 levels) | **80.3%** | 70.5% | 61.6% | 42.3% | | Rubric choice | 81.0% | **84.2%** | 47.1% | 58.8% | | Minimal choice | 80.8% | **84.5%** | 55.2% | 54.5% | | **Latency (p50)** | **17 ms** (1× GPU, in-process) | ~330 ms (hosted API) | — | — | Always answering "medium" scores 56.3%. **Per language, minimal choice** (accuracy %, n = 31–53 per language): | | ja | pl | es | de | en | ar | it | ko | nl | ru | fr | zh | pt | tr | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Raya | **90** | **86** | **87** | **74** | 86 | 73 | 87 | 88 | 78 | 82 | 78 | 79 | 76 | 67 | | Jev | 87 | 83 | 85 | 72 | 86 | 73 | **90** | **91** | **81** | **89** | **86** | **88** | **90** | **82** | Confusion, minimal choice (rows = gold small/medium/frontier, cols = Raya): `[[169, 56, 0], [30, 279, 8], [0, 14, 7]]`. **Limitations of these numbers.** On the choice questions Jev is ahead overall by 3–4 points. That gap is not statistically significant at these sample sizes (p = 0.07 and 0.13), but it is consistent. Raya is weakest in Turkish, Portuguese, and Chinese. Differences of less than ~10 points within a single language are within noise. Like Jev, Raya rarely routes to the frontier tier (7 of 21). Gold labels come from LLM annotators, not from measured downstream answer quality. ## Training - **Architecture:** Laya decision model — mmBERT-base encoder + 2-layer transformer decision head with per-option `[MASK]` scoring, initialised from `convaiinnovations/laya` (`multilingual`) and fine-tuned end-to-end. - **Data (soft labels from two blind annotators; 50/50 target where they disagreed):** WildChat-1M first-turn prompts (ODC-BY); synthetic hard / hard-looking prompts across the 14 languages (kept only if a blind annotator confirmed the intended tier); additional in-house routing data. - **Procedure:** soft-target cross-entropy, options shuffled, AdamW (encoder 2e-5, head 1e-4), batch 32, sequences capped at 512 tokens, bf16, best epoch chosen by validation accuracy (86.7% on 659 held-out validation prompts, minimal choice), per-question temperature fitted on validation. The seed was also chosen on validation only. - **Compute:** one NVIDIA RTX A6000, ~6 minutes. ## Intended use and limitations For choosing among 2–3 model tiers for chat/assistant traffic. Not for safety moderation or for more than 3 tiers. Not validated on multi-turn context. Calibrate a confidence threshold on your own traffic before auto-escalating. ## Acknowledgements Laya architecture, runtime, and base checkpoint by Convai Innovations (Apache-2.0). mmBERT by JHU CLSP (MIT). WildChat-1M by AI2 (ODC-BY). Jev is a product of TypeSafe AI; its scores come from our own runs via its API (September 2026).