Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I think that kids should be allowed to use cell phones during free time in school. Cell phones provide a way of communicating with your parents and other people you need to talk to.
If you forgot something or you need something for after school activities, you can just call your parents to bring the things you need to school. Also if there was a lock-in at school, you can call your parents to inform them that you're okay and everything is fine. In addition if you want to go to your friend's house and you need your parents to sign a slip to let you go on your friends bus, they can just bring it to school.
When you are not feeling well and you feel the need to go home, you call your parents to let them know you are not feeling that well.
 Although you can use the school's phone, it is much easier for kids to just use their phones.
 We can still keep the rule of "green zones" and "red zones" for allowing phone use in the classroom.
If it is a "green zone", you are allowed to have your phone on and use it for any purposes, but if it is a "red zone", you are supposed to have your phone turned off or on silent in your pocket.
But the teacher of the classroom is in control of the "zones".
The teacher may let his/her students use cell phones during study center or for any activity their doing.
 You can still keep the consequences of having your cell phone out during class.
First time is giving the phone to your teacher until the end of class, second time is a call to your parents, and third time is a trip to your office with the student's parents.

Cell phones are just a good way of communicating.
I know that you can trust SCHOOL_NAME
students about being responsible and to not take advantage of the cell phones.
Please take the note of consideration of keeping cell phones in SCHOOL_NAME.

Output: Write an essay discussing the benefits of allowing students to use cell phones during free time in school. Include examples of how cell phones can be used to communicate with parents and others, as well as suggestions for implementing rules and consequences for cell phone use in the classroom. Consider the potential advantages and disadvantages of allowing cell phone use in school and provide a well-supported argument for your position.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I will be talking to you about how scientist's are thinking of putting things on the planet Venus and i wll also talk to you the fasinated thing our planet Venus has to offer. Well Venus is sometimes called a Evening Star. It's so bright that young stargazer would be able to find it. Venus is very hard to get a good look at, it's the second planet from the sun. It's name can be misleading, and the planet is refrred to earth as our " twin" plaents. We haven't been able to send a spacecraft over there yet because of the fact that the stuff we send over there are not able to survive for less than an hour. Scientist's have onle been able to send robots and teven they can't find a safe landing sight.
The clouds on Venus very corrosive since they have sulfruic acid in them. The air is also 97 percent carbon dioxide. The planet also has the hostest surface, it's tempurature can reach 800 degrees Fahrenheit. The atmospheric preasure is also 90 times greater than Earth's, but despite the planets dangers it would be a worthy pursuite. For example the planets atmospheric preasure is so strong that it crush a submarine that can go into the deepest part of the ocean.
Scientist's are fascinated by the planets Earth-like apperence. They think that long ago there use be a form of life that could have been very much Earth-like. The main reasonfor why astronomer's are so fascinated by Venus is because it looks very much like Earth. For example it has valleies, river bank's, and even mountains. Scientist's are thinking of sending a blimp like aircraft that can fly or hover at least 30 if not higher miles the planet's surface. The tempurature would range around 170 degrees Fahrenheit. The best part would be that there is plenty is solar power.

Output: Discuss the potential for exploration and research on the planet Venus, including its unique characteristics and challenges, as well as the proposed methods for studying the planet.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The use of this technology to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is valuable in some ways and some not because a computer knowing when your happy or sad could be beneficial in your classroom. For example if you smile when a web ad appears on your screen, a similar ad will follow. But if you frown, the next ad wll be different. A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored and then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor. But I bet your lab partner could recognize if you are happy, sad, or mad. Its all about muscular action units. They indicate the difference between a genuine smile and a forced smile. In a real smile the muscles that begin at your cheek bones lift the corners of your mouth. In a false smile, the mouth is strecthed sideways. Muscle clues are sometimes important. Which is why I think that this technology is better off not being useful in classes because you can detect a person being happy, sad, or mad by yourself by muscle clues. To an expert, faces dont lie.

Output: Discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of using technology to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom. Consider the effectiveness of this technology in modifying lessons and improving student engagement, as well as the limitations of relying solely on facial expressions to gauge emotions. Evaluate whether this technology is a valuable tool for educators or if it is better left unused.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Why do people get multiple opinions instead of just one? The answer is simple. Multiple opinions are better than one for many reasons, it is good to hear all sides of the story, two heads are better than one, having multiple opinions helps you find the right answer. Why should we listen to all sides of the story? Wouldn't it be better to just know one and stick with it? No! hearing all of the sides of a story helps you form better opinions and ideas You can combine your ideas and opinions to make better, more thought out ideas. Hearing all sides of the story is also way more fair than only listening to one person and refusing to listen to any one else. If you do that, then how will you know if the choice you made is the right choice? Can you live with yourself forever knowing that you made the wrong decision? Working together is better and easier than trying to do everything yourself. If you do that, you could try to do to much. If you do that, then you will never be able to catch up. Working together can fix that. If you work in a group, or just with a partner, you can get things done twice as fast. When working together you can make better ideas for how to do something. You can bounce back ideas and improve them. Working together can help you solve problems faster. Working with others is definitely better than trying to do everything alone.
 Having multiple opinions can help you find the right opinion. No matter how much you are like someone, no matter how much you agree, you can not agree on everything. Two people can never be exactly alike. So you can't always get only one opinion from only one person. They might always give good advice and opinions, but sometimes their opinions are not right for you. You have to remember that you are your own person, and that sometimes things are right for other people, but they are not always right for you. You can talk it through with others and find a decision that is right for everyone. Talking decisions through can help you consider all possible options. Asking lots of people their opinion and why they think that can help you make a good design, but do not just do what everyone else did. You have to do what is best for you. Getting multiple opinion can help you make better choices. You should hear all sides of the story, work in groups, and get multiple opinion to find the right decision for you. These things will help you make the best choice. Try them, and you will make great decisions. The only thing you have to do is get multiple opinions.

Output: Explain the benefits of seeking multiple opinions when making important decisions. Use examples to support your argument and discuss how this approach can lead to better outcomes.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The principle wants all students to take at least one extracurricular activity I agree with the principle having one will help you real under stand to manage your time wisely,and it can help you under stand how you spend your time. My opinion is if he makes this a requirement for students will have a better chance to succeed in the real world with what they learned for example managing,and learning the value of time will help you make the right chooses. One reason I agree with the principle is that studies have shown that have done a extracurricular are the most likely to succeed in life cause they have learned the too most important things in life to me is what you should use your. Time on or what is worth your time not much people know this Second reason I agree is that time is priceless it is not infinite people dont know how much time they really have therefor its better to make the best of it before its all gone therefor the people who have chosen to use there time. Wisely they have much more time cause they have done what they had to do getting more time but it docent mean the people around them will get the same cause they chose there path and they chose there toured success. By choosing that path they have chosen there future which docent really change unless there has been a large impact like death or courage to do what ever it takes to succeed no mater what any body says to try to turn you down. Final reason is managing time is what you need for jobs therefor if you are learning it early own the essayer it is,and to lost of people this is a great skill to have therefor this quality will get you many jobs since you know how to. Work your schedule therefor there work on time team projects have time on your schedule and someone cant make it they type of people often help out and get promotion or get played into a low payed job but that docent really happen often. Sincerly,therefor if the princple dicidcides to make having a elxctoal activity a requirment he or she is leading students to succeed in th future if all schools do this etheir their will be less poverty or more students passing by the years will drop out which do the people choice?

Output: Explain the benefits of participating in extracurricular activities and argue whether or not it should be a requirement for all students to participate in at least one activity, based on the principle's belief that it will help students succeed in the real world.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Some schools require students to complete summer projects to assure they continue learning during their time away from school. these summer projects be student-designed instead of teacher-designed. it tells the teacher what the student actually learned throughout the school year makes the student go at their own pace instead of feeling rushed.
 Having a student design their own project shows what they have learned throughout the school year. If a teacher was to design a project for a class of students, most of them will not even try. Most of them would try to find ways to finish the project without showing that they had learned anything during the school year. But having a student design their own project shows that they have learned something during the school year, and had a decent knowledge of what they had learned. Also a student-designed project will make the student not feel rushed. Having a student-designed project will make the student go at his or her pace. When a teacher makes a project for a class, theres most likely a rubric that the students must follow and a deadline of when the project must be turned in. Most students will feel rushed and will not put their maximum effort into doing the project on their own, and will probably try to cheat or copy of the internet. But having students design their own projects, they set their own rubric and follow their own deadline of when to get it done. When going at their own pace students will show their maximum effort into their project. Summer projects are required by some schools to assure that the students had learned something from the previous year and to continue their learning for the following year. It will tell the teacher what the student had learned and may need help on. Also it will also make the student not feel rushed when he or she was making the project. Giving a student the chance to design their own project will show self-advocacy and how independent they are. Therefore, I believe that summer projects should be student-designed rather that teacher-designed

Output: Should summer projects be student-designed or teacher-designed in order to ensure that students continue learning during their time away from school? Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of each approach and argue for which one you believe is more effective in promoting student learning and engagement.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: It's better to ask multiple people you can get the best answer for what your looking for To ask for advice you will need more then one persons thoughts on what the subject is to make the best choose. It's better to take more answers then one so you can make the best choose. Better to hear out multiply people then to hear just one persons ideas. Ask people that have had to make the same chose as you When someone is making a big life chose you will probably need to hear peoples options. When a person changes school that's a really big chose to make it will change a persons life. When I need advice about my choose I ask more then one person so I can find the best dission. when people go for advice it's use a major dission that you will need multiply peoples opinion. Ask the people that have your best chose in heart. combine all the advice,and to see where it get's you. When you are deciding to something mildly life changing like get a tattoo thats going to to be on your body for, yes your going to need to get opinions of people that have tattoos, or getting a a piercing multiply peoples advice to make your chose. When a person is about to spend the rest of their life with some you will need a married peoples advice to make that chose. When your trying to decided weather to be friends with someone it's better to take multiple peoples advice Is it better to ask multiple people for advice? I think personally Yes, It's one of the best way to make your best and final dission. Over the years I have learned that it is the best way to make your chose is to ask multiple peoples advice. To seek multiple peoples advice will all time be the best way to find what your looking for. So is it the best way yes because you will defiantly get the best answer that way.

Output: Explain the benefits of seeking advice from multiple people when making important decisions. Provide examples of situations where seeking multiple opinions would be beneficial and discuss how combining these opinions can lead to better decision-making.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Growing up most all of us have watched cartoons with self driving cars or movies with the idea of a car that can drive itself. But can you imagine if that idea could soon become real? Google and many other companys have been trying at this idea for years and have been very succseful with the expirement. The idea of a self driving car has snagged the attention of many people and especially Google who have acaully made this come true in 2009 when they made the first self driving car. These cars a have drove all over without a single acident reported. So as you can imagine this sparks the question, Are self driving car safer on the roads then normals car? Well self driving car all based on sensors that detect anything and everything in the road. They keep with the speed limit adamatically, stop at aproprited time and also slow down when is needed. Adomatic cars will reduce the amount of accidents we have on the road by a lot. Accident are moslty caused by a driver, with adomatic cars, they will stop quicker than a person has time to react. But this plan will only work if everyone gets a smart car. Say if three out of four people get a smart car there will still be some normal cars left on the road, which with those cars an aciddent can be made. Self driving cars can avoid all the natural accident such as an animal running in the road or bad weather conditons. In addition to that many driver become sleepy or distracted when it come to driving, when self driving car are machines that will not do that. With self drving cars there will be no need to get a license. Many teens struggle with passing the lenglthy test to get your license. As people age one of the most common things to get bad is eye sight This self driving cars elders can still do the things they need to do such as go to the store or visit family with have to relie on other people for tranportation. Self driving cars are going to be the safest option on the roads today They aviod accidents, reduce the cost of normal veichals and are more efficent than normals cars. This is why these self driving google car should be developed.

Output: Discuss the safety benefits of self-driving cars compared to traditional cars and the potential impact on transportation and society as a whole.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Luke helped innocent people and now other people should to. Helping isn't just being nice. It is also about caring sharing and giving. Not disrespect, mistreat, and ignore.
All people deserve the same right. luke got injured and he had to rest for a couple days but he stil went on to finish the mission. He didn't even have an idea that his life was gonna change he just took the chance when it was offered and he never doubted it.
After the war he joined the UNRRA(the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration).Luke was only 18 when all of this happened. He helped out at his aunt Katie's ranch for most of his days when he was just a little boy. He helped with the enviorment and cattle and other animals at the places where ww2 took place. Alot of people died but not in his hands.
Brave people survived and never forgot the memory of ww2. Luke being a Seagoing cowboy was the thing that he was most proud of. It opened up everything and everywhere to him that made him feel awesome for helping out arround the world instead of just watching other people take his opportunity.

Output: Write an essay about the importance of helping others, using Luke's experiences as a Seagoing cowboy and his work with the UNRRA as examples. Discuss how helping others involves more than just being nice, and how it requires caring, sharing, and giving. Also, explain why it is important to treat all people with respect and not mistreat or ignore them.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
the use of using cras less it a much saver healthier to the air this essay is to imfomr felloe citizens about the advantages og limiting car usage As it is stated in the passage Residents of the  upscale communtiy in german hav e given up their cars "Street parking ,drive ways and home garages are geneally forbiddean in the experimental new district". Car ownership is allowed but there are only two places that you can park ,large garages at the end of the development(2) ,car owners buy the space for $40000 alone with a home(2). Becaus of this 70 percent of the families dont own cars while 57 percent do own cars (3)."When i had a car i was always tense ,i am much happier this way " said heidrun walter . Completed in 2006 is an example of a growing trend in Europe also the United states and elsewhere to separate suburban life from auto life use  , as a componet of a movement called "smart planning (4) ". Passengers cars are responsible for 12 percent of green house gas emissions in europe ,up to 50 percent in some car intensive areas in the united states .  Past few decades efforts have been made to make cities denser and better for walking ,planners are nikw taking this concept to the suburs ,home to 5500 residents within a rectangular square mile .In this new appocah stores will be placed in a walk way  on the main streest rather then in malls alone some distant high ways .
"ALL of our developement since world war 2 have been centered on the car ,and that will have to change " (7) said david goldberg .
Paris enforced a partical ban unpon driving to clear the glabal city ,almost 4,000 drivers were fined according to Reuters  27 people had their cars impounded for their reaction fine .Because of that congestion was down 60 percent in the captail of france ,the smog rivaled beijing ,china which is known as one of the most polluted citesbin the world. Diseal fuel was blamed ,diseal makes up 67 percent of vehicles in france while 53.3 percent are diseal engines in the western europe. The smog was cleared enough on monday for french party to recined the ban for odd numbers plates on tuesday. In colombia a program was set ,leaving the streets of the capital city devoid of traffic jams ". Its a good opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution " , day without cars is an improvenment campagin that begun in the mid 1990's .Parks ,sports centers bloomed throughout the city ,uneven pitted sidewalks hace been replaced and so on .Recent studies suggest that americans are buyiinh fewer cars etc ..which left reserches poundering 'Has americs passed peak driving"? But americans love affair with its vehicles seemse to be cooling adjusted for population growth number of miles driven peaked in 2005 than droopend after that .Many meaures  the decrease in driving preced the downturn which is persisitinbg now that recover is under way . if this pattern persists it will be benefical impliactiins for carbon emissions and environment. With all these changes people who stopped car commutin as a result of the recession may find less reason to resume the habit

Output: Explain the advantages of limiting car usage and the growing trend of separating suburban life from auto life use, as a component of a movement called "smart planning". Use examples from the passage to support your argument and discuss the potential benefits for carbon emissions and the environment.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I am agreeing in favor of keeping the Electoral College. There is no need to change to election by popular vote for the president of the United States. That is because the House of Representatiives helps elect for us, it helps us to balance our votes and avoid problems of election. The Electoraal college helps the people out alot with the voting situation and helps us to better undrstand and know our new president. The broader significance of the electoral College is that the House of Representatives helps us vote for our new president. In source One paragraph three it says "Your state's entitled alloment of electors equal the number of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each number in the House of Representatives plus two for your Senators...."That tells me that we the people are not alone in this process of voting who will be our next president. Also in the same source but paragraph five it states "The electors are generally chosen by the candidate's political party." This informs me that not only the House of Representavtives is involved in the elections.  Tthe govenment is important to the Electoal College because the votes of the government count most to the College.
 It is evident that the Electoral College helps us to balance our votes. As stated in Source Three "The Electoral College restores some of the weight in the political balance that large states (by population) lose by virtue of the mal-apportionment of the Senate decreed in the Constitution..." This lets me know that we -as the people- won't have to worry to much about the voting and selection of the president. Another peice of evidence stated in the same source and paragraph "So, other things being equal, a large state gets more attention from presidential candidates in a campaign than a small state does..." That states that not all people and states have to worry about who the president will be. The Electoral College hepls us out alot mostly to the big states in the United States.
Above all the Electoral College avoid problems of the elections. In source Three, paragraph Twenty-two it states "The Electoral College avoids problems of the elections in whcich no candidate recieves a majority of the votes cast." This lets us know that the Electoral College is doing a good job on keeping the votes clean and simple to understand. Also stated in the same source and paragraph "There is no pressure for run-off elections when no candidate wins a moajoity of the votes cast; that pressure, which would greatly complicate the presidential electionn process, is reduced by the Electoral College, which ivariably producess a clear winner..." That tells me that the Electoral College is keeping the votes on point.
 There are some people out there who don't agree with the Electoral College and dont like the way the votes are being put in because sometimes the president that they chose wasn't elected. They are wrong to disagree with the Electoral College because the College keeps everything going in order and in a clear path to let us know who our president will be. As stated in Source Two paragraph Ten "Under the electoral college system, voters vote not for the president, but for the slate of electors, who in tur elect the president. This makes them disagree because they think that the Electoral College doesn't vote for their president, but they souldn't worry because they way they vote is by how many states helped the electors to vote for that presient being chosen as the president. Also In Source Two "At the most basic level, the electoral college is unfair to voters. Because of the winner-take-all system in each state, candidates don't spend time in states they know they have no chance of winning,focusing only on the tight races in the "swing" states." That makes some people diagree also, but the Electoral College doesn't count how many people in each big or small state voted for president. All the college does is help the governmtent elect for the president that they most support and elect for. I agree that the Electoral College should be kept in favor because of all the help that it gives us and the government. Also the College helps us stay balanced on the votes so that nothing gets missplaced or missunderstood. Most of all it avoids problems during the election so that the people and the government are satisfied with their votes. The Eletroal College is a great way to keep things going at a clear election of the year. The Electoral College doesn't need any changes for me because even if they chose on the elections of the government the votes of the people still count to them as well. The votes of the peopel are important to the Electoral College just as much as the government's votes are.

Output: Explain why the Electoral College should be kept in favor and why changing to a popular vote for the president of the United States is unnecessary. Provide evidence from sources to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Some people think that the face on Mars is really created by aliens. There is some scientifical evidence to this. The real fact is that the face on Mars is just a natural landform.
 When NSSA's Mars Global Survey spacecraft was in space it took pictures. A few days later NASA unveiled a image. There was a natural landform that looked like a human head, shadows gave the rock some eyes, a noes, and mouth. People began thinking that it was an acutal thing created by aliens. Scientists didn't believed this though. On April 5, 1998, Mars Global Surveyor flew over Cydonia for the first time. The team up there snapped picures of the landform again and people were eager to find out the truth about the face. After seeing the picture when it was appeared on a JPL web site people now knew the truth. It is just a landform and not a face created by aliens. It's obvious now, the face is just a naturtal landform. There were no aliens.

Output: Explain the controversy surrounding the "face on Mars" and the scientific evidence that supports the natural landform theory.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Driverless cars seem to be extremely close to releasing to the public. Many companies have been working on driverless cars for years. These cars have great potential to change the world of transportation. The cars have positive and negative aspects, but I believe that driverless cars will be a positive effect on the world. Driverless cars could change the transportation. It would make it easier to go place to place. Driverless cars could prevent accidents from occurring in everyday traffic. These cars would be much safer than a car with a reckless driver. Millions of car accidents happen every year, but driverless cars could potentially prevent most of these accidents. With a driverless car, the passengers are safer because the car is programmed to work well. If there was an emergency, someone could take the wheel and have control of the car. Driverless cars have great potential for public transportation. Driverless cars could act like a taxi or bus system. This system of driverless cars would safe people money by not owning their own car. It would be safer to have many of these cars. Millions are killed in drunk driving accidents, and these cars would give potential drunk drivers an alternative way to get home safely. These cars could be used in a public transportation system to help people travel in their every day lives. Driverless cars are approaching quickly, and there must be decisions made on their involvement of people's lives. These cars would be safer than reckless drivers on the road. These cars have a potiental of changing public transportation, and they would make it more convenient and safer for others. Although there are some negatives to driverless cars, the amount of positive aspects outweigh the negative aspects. Driverless cars should be developed and reach the public.

Output: Discuss the potential positive and negative effects of driverless cars on transportation and public safety, and argue whether or not driverless cars should be developed and released to the public.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Have you ever wondered why the citizens of a country have the opportunity to voice their opinion in which who they feel should be president. Well i found some information in source 1 that talks about electoral college. Electoral college is not a place but its a process that was found in the constitution as a compromise between election of president by the votes in congress and election oof the president by a popular votes of qualified citizens of the country. I think that they shouldn't change to popular vote in the United States because the electoral college is more fair and plus they don't know the outcome of the election of the popular votes of the prsident of the United States. I support the electoral college because it allows you to voice your opinions in which who you feel should been president. It's also makes you feel that once you voted that your opinion matters. In source 1 they talk about when the "Presidential election is held every four years on the Tuesday afterthe first Monday in November." also you help choose youir state's electors when you vote for President because when you vote for yor candidate you are actually voting for you candidate's electors.  In source 2 they explain it in more details. "Under the electoral college system, voters votes not for thre president, but for a slate of electors, who in turn elect the president." They mean that don't matter if you vote for "John Kerry" and he's a Democratic and the number of whoever pledge to Kerry would be added on to his votes. thats why i like the electoral college. But one the other hand, there saying that they might change it to the election of the popular votes of the president of the United States. I think they should keep using the electoral college because it actually have better benefits or outcomes because you know who you voted for and from what they told you you believe they can make it happen. There's some states that have a "winner-take-all" system that awards all electors to the winning presidential candidate. But the bad side about the electoral college is that what happens if thr president you like is a republican but you like the democratic senator? Well i dont know what your going to do then because going to be a problem. Electoral college is not a place but its a process that was found in the constitution as a compromise between election of president by the votes in congress and election oof the president by a popular votes of qualified citizens of the country. I think that they shouldn't change to popular vote in the United States because the electoral college is more fair and plus they dont know the outcome of the election of the popular votes of the prsident of the United States.

Output: Explain the purpose and function of the electoral college in the United States presidential election process, and argue for or against the use of the electoral college system.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: To allow cell phones in school is like letting kids play games and school is not fun and games One reason why cell phones should not be aloud in school is other schools might not allow cell phones so who are we going text or call and why would we just text a person that is only down the hall that we will be talking to in a few minutes at lunch. Another reason why cell phones should not be allowed in school is the halls and the lunch room would be really loud from all of the ring tones. That would be really annoying to the students in class. We come to school to learn and having cell phones around us is just distracting. Next thing you'll know students will start bringing ipods, portable gaming systems, and more. So, bringing cell phones to school doesn't help our education. It just distracts us because during class all you can think about is getting out of class to text your friend. I totally think letting kids bring cell phones to school is a bad idea.

Output: Explain why allowing cell phones in school may not be beneficial for students' education and may cause distractions in the classroom.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The Face is a bonafide example of a natural landform. However, some people say that it is an ancient artifact that proves that there is life on Mars. Scientists have said that the Face is just another buttle or Martian mesa, that the Face is just another natural landform and there isn't a face at all. It is just a common landform. Even if the masses aren't satisfied, the Face will remain just a buttle or Martian mesa Martian mesas are common enough around Cydonia, the place where the Face was found. The Face only has shadows that make it appear like a face. Conspiracy theorists say that the Face might be evidence of ancient civilization on Mars, but defenders of NASA's budget beg to differ. As the text states "There wasn't an alien monument after all."The passage also reads that Malin sent a team to capture a more clear picture of the Face. Some said that there might have been hidden alien markings, and they were proven wrong. The Mars Global Surveyor drew close enough to get a clear picture of the Face. As it turns out, there really wasn't a alien monument after all. In the beginning, there was no face to begin with. The Face only had unusual shadows that made it look like a face. NASA unveiled the image for everyone to see and here in the passage it reads "huge rock formation...which resembles a human head...formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose and mouth." This shows that there wasn't a face, just an illusion. There is the arguement that the Face is evidence of an ancient civilization At the time the picture of the Face was taken, it was winter. Perhaps the alien markings were hidden by the cloudy haze. Mission controllers even looked again On a cloudless, summer day, the Mars Global Surveyor drew close enough to take the another picture, in hope there was something that they didn't see. Even so, the scientists were proven right again. The Face was really a mesa, a landform common in Cydonia. In conclusion, the Face turned out to be a common landform. Just another buttle, another landform, another rock formation, not really a face at all. There is no evidence that there was even a civilization and there wasn't even evidence that there was life to begin with! Again, there could have been alien markings that were covered by the haze, and there could have been life on Mars. Let us face the facts though; in this reality; there isn't a face on Mars, there isn't a civilization on Mars and it is just another landform.

Output: Discuss the controversy surrounding the "Face" on Mars and the evidence presented by scientists and conspiracy theorists regarding its origins and significance.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The Electoral College is a system which was established to elect the president of the United States of America. In this system, each state receives a group of electors. The number of electors each state is awarded is based on the representation a state has in Congress. The total number of electors per state equals the number of people a state has in the House of Representative plus the two senators a state has. In a state, the electors pledge to vote for the candidate who wins the popular vote This system is simply unneeded in modern times and is unneccesarily complicated. The Electoral College must be abolished. the Electoral College should be eradicated because it is simply unreliable The result of a direct election would be more transparent and would make the citizens of this country certain the election was democratic and just. The issue lies in the fact that voters are technically only voting for electors to cast a vote for a candidate, and not for a candidate themselves. These electors pledge to vote in favor of the candidate who rightly wins the popular vote in a state, but some attempt to be defiant. For instance, according to Bradford Plumer's article, "Back in 1960, segregationists in the Lousiana legislature nearly succeeded in replacing the Democratic electors with new electors who would oppose John F. Kennedy" (11). If the Lousiana legislature was successful in their attempt to be defiant, electoral votes would not go to Kennedy despite him winning the popular vote in that state. Another way in which the Electoral College is unreliable is that it allows for a tied vote. There are 538 electoral votes in the system currently in use, meaning it is possible for two candidates to receive 269 votes each. This may seem unlikely, but it is more likely to occur than some might think. For instance, as according to Plumer's aforementioned article, an electoral tie would have occured in 1968 if only 41,971 more votes were for the losing candidate. Additionally, in the 1976 election, if 5,559 voters in the swing state of Ohio, and 3,687 voters in Hawaii had simply voted in favor of the candidate with the minority of the votes, a tie would have occured. In order to resolve a tie, the House of Representatives casts votes to decide the winner of the election. At this point, the impact of each representative is skewed so representatives of states with lower population can more easily decide the state's vote. This happens because each state only votes once, so the few representatives of a small state such as Nebraska can decide who to vote for rather easily, while in California, 55 representatives with different views must colloborate to cast a single vote. the Electoral College must be abolished because it does not properly refelct the views of the nation. Citizens' wishes will not always be equivalent to what the electors vote for. This occurs partly because of the winner-take-all system. In this system, the winner of the popular vote in an individual state wins all of the electoral votes a state has. According to the Office of the Federal Register, all but two states use this system. These two states are Nebraska and Maine. As a result of the winner-take-all system, it is possible that a presidential candidate loses the overall popular vote, but wins more electoral votes and thus wins the election. This occurance happened in the infamous 2000 election, when Al Gore won the popular vote but lost to George W. Bush by a mere five electoral votes. If the public indicated they wanted Al Gore as president, why should Bush have won due to this unfair system? It simply doesn't make sense. The winner-take-all system also results in political campaigns to focus their efforts in only certain regions. Some states very predictably vote either for the Republican candidate or for the Democratic candidate. Take Texas, for instance, which has traditionally always voted red. A Democratic candidate knows he should not focus his campaign in Texas, because he realizes his best efforts won't allow him to win the popular vote there and thus win the electoral votes. Because of the tendencies of certain states, many electoral votes are practically predetermined. The states which do not typically only vote in favor of one side are labelled "swing states". With the way the Electoral College works, the few states which are a toss-up carry the most weight. Presidential candidates will usually spend most of their time in these swing states, and very little time in others. For example, in the 2000 election, seventeen states were not visited by either candidate. Supporters of the Electoral College view the disproportional focus of campaigns as a positive. According to Richard A. Posner's article in favor of this corrupt system, "The Electoral College restores some of the weight in the political balance that large states lose by virtue of the mal-apportionment of the Senate decreed in the Constituion..." (21) While it might seem reasonable for larger states to have a larger impact than smaller states, it simply isn't a fair way to go about having an election. Voters should each have the same impact, and they would have exactly that in a direct election Presently, voters in Florida, for instance, have more impact on the election than a voter in Wyoming. Supporters also claim the focus on swing states is beneficial because residents of swing states should be more politically informed due to their state's importance in the election This notion is simply a fabrication in order to make the Electoral College seem as if it causes America to be more informed, because there would be no need for residents of specific states to pay closer attention to candidates than residents of others if a direct election were to take place. The Electoral College does not properly reflect the desire of the nation's population, and thus should be replaced. In retrospect, the Electoral College must be abolished. It is an inherently unfair system and it does not reflect the views of American voters

Output: Explain the flaws of the Electoral College system and argue for its abolition in favor of a direct election system in the United States presidential elections.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I agree with this statement this can help students social skills This helps their social skills because when they are doing new things like playing a sport,doing student council,and working on yearbooks all of those things include team work. Students will have to work with their peers while on a sports team when they are competing or even at practice, because they have to communicate what their next move is going to be. When your in a team working on yearbooks you and your team have to work together to come up with designs,headlines,and even captions. This takes a lot of social skills because you have to agree on ideas, and to help each other to create a final product. Even while doing student council for a extracurricular activity takes a lot of social skills, because you have to work together to create fun and amazing actives for the students at your schools. You also have to communicate with the students in your school to see what ideas they have for actives they would like to see and come to in the future. Having friends is a big part in life so your not lonely, so these activities can help you with making new friends When your playing a sport or even watching a sport on TV you can tell that they are like a family. So when your playing a sport maybe you are playing with people you haven't meet before, thats a great opportunities to talk and see what you guys have in common. Yearbook is a very good way to make friends because you are in groups working and planning together, and that helps you get to know them more by talking and hearing there ideas. Also by interviewing people and taking pictures of the people in your school can help you meet new people that you havent meet before. Student council is a great opportunity to make friends because you are working with people everyday to make school a fun place to be. Even hosting event can be a great place to mingle with new and even older kids in you school. helps the kids to be more outgoing I am a very shy person so I know how it feels when you go somewhere new and you dont know anybody. These things can helps students break out of their shell and talk to new people. Also this helps students be more outgoing to a teacher as well because that helps student feel safe, and helps then feel ensured that they have a trusted adult. Having a trusted adult is a good thing for kids when they are going through hard times, because they are to scared and shy to trust someone they just meet, and to tell their issues to. Being outgoing is a good trait in life so you can make friends and be able to do new thing, and not be scared about doing it. Which is why it's good to be outgoing earlier in life, so when you get older it's easier to get a job. I'd say be outgoing is a very good thing to be good at and being able to stay after with new people and talk with them can have an impact on that. Extracurricular actives can help you get away from negative things in your life that you might go home to,or face in a school day. These actives can keep you away from those thing because then this is your time to stay at school for a longer and do something you enjoy. These actives can help you get you mind off of thing happening in your life and bad things that happen at school and maybe help you feel less overwhelmed. Not having to go home straight away to do all the homework, and you get to hangout with friends and relax from school work. Program like these have shown that these things help kids do better in school because they have something they enjoy in their day and not be pressured to get good grades and to spend hours on homework everyday to get perfect scores on their test. Students need time to have a time to them self to release stress and have a good time with their friends. Having these actives for kids help them stay active while they are participating in a sport and even when they are participating in other actives the school offers. These thing help kids get out of their house and stops them from watching TV, and playing video games all the time. Yearbook could be a better solution because even though your looking at a computer it still helps your brain going and helps your brain thinking. Programs that allow kids to do extra actives allows the students to be more healthier because they are either moving and exercising their body or their brain. I think a reason that schools have these actives is so students are sitting a home and for students to be more involved at school. Also another thing that these thing helps students health is because they aren't always stressed all the time to heavy classes with lots of homework. These students are doing fun and easy classes to help them be more active and involved at their school.

Output: Explain how extracurricular activities, such as sports, student council, and yearbook, can improve students' social skills, help them make new friends, and encourage them to be more outgoing. Additionally, discuss how these activities can provide a healthy outlet for students to relieve stress and improve their overall well-being.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I believe that changing school policy so that students may not participate in sports or other activities unless they have at least a grade B average is a bad decision. If the school policy was changed there would not be many students participating in sports or other activities. Many students have a grade C average which would inconvenient them from participating in school sports and/or activities.
Not many students who have a grade B average are athletic to participate in sports but would enjoy participating in school activities such as clubs. But if there are not enough students to participate in school sports it would just be a waste of money to purchase equipment for those sports. Many students who play sports have a grade C average and are very athletic students. It would also be unfortunate for students who do play sports to not be able to participate if they have a grade C average. If those students do not participate they would probably not participate in school activities that they do not enjoy.
 Changing school policy is also a bad idea because many students rely on athletic scholarships to get into college since not all families are lucky enough to send their children to college without having to worry about have financial problems doing so But since the prices for college tuition is going up not many students have enough money to attend college right after high school. Many of those students also have a grade C average. Also many students who are very good at sports but not very academically skilled may see that sports are what help them get by in life. Those students also find it very difficult to get into a good college they can afford if they have a grade C average but do not have a chance to get into a college if they cannot get a scholarship for athleticism.
 So I hope you reconsider of changing school policy so that students may not participate in sports or other activities unless they have at least a grade B average because not many students do. Those students may also rely on baseball or football scholarships to get into college if they cannot afford it on their own. Also they schools would be wasting money for buying sports equipment if there are not enough students for those sports to play since many of them have a grade C average.

Output: Explain why changing school policy to require a minimum grade of B for participation in sports or other activities is a bad decision, considering the impact on student participation, athletic scholarships, and school resources.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
When in the need of advice,would you ask others what they would do in that situation? Well,when asking others what they would do,they give you an idea of how different people would handle different situations. For example,if you were an 8th grader going to High School,you would most likely want some advice from a person who has had or if they were to experience what your going through. Everyone's different,which means everyone has different ideas and opinions. So,the next time you find yourself in a situation where you need advice,make to sure to:
Figure out what YOU would do
Ask others what THEY would do
Compare yout ideas and opinions with theirs
Make new ideas and create new solutions for your problems.
Hopefully,with these simple steps,you'll seek better advice and opinions.
The Right People
If you have found yourself in a situation where you would want some advice,finding the right people to ask is very important. To find the right people to ask for advice,you should:
If the person has gotten into a lot of trouble for his dicisions,it's not really a great idea asking him/her.
Make sure the person is serious and not a joker. Finding the right people to ask is very important,and with these reasons you'll find the right people to ask for advice.

Output: Explain the importance of finding the right people to ask for advice and provide examples of characteristics to look for in potential advisors.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Yes, many people do think that the "Face on Mars" was a monument created by aliens, possibly creating a sign of some sort. However, this is not true. What you think is the "face" is actually a natural landform. This natural landform may appear to look like a face, but why?
 The landform looks like a face becuase of the shadows that hit the landform in certain areas. "... this... had unusual shadows that made it look like an Egyptian Pharaoh (2)." It makes it look somewhat like a face. "...a huge rock formation... which resembles a human head... formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth (3)." Another reason why the landform looks like a face is becuase our eyes, that play tricks on us, may make it seem real that it is a face. Such as illusion that make it appear that the landform looks like a face that is staring up at the camera on Mars. Many poeple, however will still ask for more evidence that the landform is not alien artifact. "...Mars Oribiter Camera (MOC) team snapped a picture ten times sharper than the origional... photos... when the image first appeared on a JPL web site, revealing... a natural landform. There was no monument at all (7)." "What the picture actually shows in the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa- landforms common around the American West... That's a lava dome that takes the form of an isolated mesa about the same height as the Face on Mars (12)." So the landforms that you are seeing are actually common along the American West. They don't just pop up out of nowhere. They have been seen before. It's not like it is a first thing that scientists are just discovering. This evidence proves that there is no alien monument on Mars, it may appear to look like it. But scientists have proved that it is only a natural landform, created naturally, on Mars. Not an alien monument that was created as a sign by aliens on Mars.

Output: Explain why many people believe that the "Face on Mars" is a monument created by aliens, and provide evidence to support the claim that it is actually a natural landform.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Over the years cell phones have become a very useful tool .The demand of using a phone has risen in today's society . But should we be able to use our cell phones while being on the road? The number of people that have used their phones on the roads and highways have increased so much . Some people don't understand how important it is to be completely focused on the road and for the people in their car and everyone near them. Should we leave a message unread or not answer a call or answer the text or call but be at risk of causing the life of someone ? People tend to always want to be on their phones and be in touch with other people during social media, call, or text , despite the danger of causing an accident. We keep our phones closer than our loved ones. Phones are a constant distraction such as meetings, movies ,meals and especially when we are driving. Everyday people die from car accidents because someone was using their phone while driving . Studies have shown that there is a 4% greater risk of drivers being in a car accident due to using a cell phone. Overall the crashes every year because of cell phones are 1.6 millions with 330,000 million injured in them. Hands free devices can also be harmful You are focused on the road but if something happens to your phone for example the call ended or you received a message then you are distracted and want to grab your phone . A lot of people would think that probably if I just take one second to look at my phone nothing will happen. But that's not true a car accident can happen based on the driver not looking on the road . You can't multitask when you are driving ! If you would like to be a safe driver you would have to make sure you process a ton of information about your environment and surroundings at all times. Georgia's new hands free cell phone law has resulted in more than 1,000 tickets since the start of the law Georgia's residents aren't allowed to have their phone in their hand or part of their body . They are only allowed to use if it's on a wireless headphones, speaker or bluetooth . Their first fine is $50 , second is $100, and third is $150 and a subsequent conviction . Georgia has become the 16th state that enacted a hands free driving law. Georgia would like for residents to stop using their devices when driving because cell phones only continue to increase the number of accidents. It's a privilege to be able to drive and we shouldn't just think about ourselves but about the people we are risking when we are driving. Cell phones are a very important tool in our life but we should know when it's not the right time to use it. It's better to leave the phone down and ignore the missed calls and texts then not being able to get to our destination and being with our loved ones because we couldn't leave our phone down. Put it down and just drive !

Output: Should cell phone use be allowed while driving, despite the potential danger it poses to oneself and others on the road? Consider the increasing number of accidents caused by distracted driving, the risks associated with hands-free devices, and the potential consequences of not being fully focused on the road. Analyze the impact of Georgia's hands-free driving law and discuss whether similar laws should be implemented in other states.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Have you ever thought on keeping the Electoral Vote or change it by popular vote for the president of the United States? I think you have. Well, we know what Electoral Vote is, the founding fathers established it in the Constitution as a compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens On my opinion the Electoral Vote should be changed in order for people to vote for the president they want.
 To begin with, the Electoral vote has a job to do. For example,if someone wants to run for president and the electoral vote has no voice in the selection there is a probability that the person doesn't get a change to talk to the people. As stated on
(Source 3)
"..... it is the electors who elect the president, not the people. When you vote for a presidential candidate you're actually voting for a slate of electors." This means that we the people have no right on electing the president. Every vote for a president it first goes through the Electoral Vote hands and then they decide whether or not to set him as a president. Moreover, the Electoral Vote is like the king of a country, it decides the president and its votes. In the Constitution there is an amendment that says evryone is equal . however in this except from
(Source 3)
says otherwise, " So, other things being equal, a large state gets more attention from presidential candidates in a campaing than small states does..." The founding father were part of the Constitution but also part of the Electoral Vote, which have been taken that amendment way too far. In conclusion, the Electoral Vote is been taking evrything to their power. They should be removed from electing presidents. They are going to be

Output: Should the United States continue to use the Electoral Vote system for electing the president, or should it be replaced with a popular vote system? Write an essay discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each system and argue for which one you believe is the better option. Consider the role of the Electoral Vote in the selection process, the potential impact on smaller states, and the principles of democracy and equality. Use at least three sources to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
The Face on Mars is a very talked about landform on Mars and it brings many conspiract theories with it. NASA stresses that it is a natural landform called a mesa while other beleive it was made by aliens. NASA says it is a natural landform becuase it is in the Cydonia region of Mars which has many landform like the Face They have also done extensive research on the Face and took many photos over the years. Their latest photo was in 2001. This photo was evidence that it had to be natural because each pixel shoed only 1.56 meters which meant that if there was any strage markings or buildings they would easily be seen. NASA also states the the Face on Mars is very similar to mesas on earth. Jim Garvin, chief scientist for NASA's Mars Exploration Program, says " It reminds me most of Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho...".
 With the research NASA has done and with all the photo evidence it is easy to say that the Face on Mars is indeed a natural landform. Everything NASA has done to prove this eliminates any speculation or doubt brought up by the public. The Face on Mars is just another reason to appreciate the beauty of the universe and the hard work of NASA.

Output: Explain the controversy surrounding the Face on Mars and the evidence presented by NASA to support their claim that it is a natural landform.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
The author finds that studing Venus would be a good thing because of how it is or was similar to earth There is evidence of Venus being largely being covered by oceans as weel as mountains and valleys with rocky sediments this may give clues or refrences about extraterestrial life that humans have been looking for. Even though exploration on the surface of venus may be near impossible for humans, machines may be able to explore a given time on the suface of Venus colecting samples from things like rocks.
 Venus has analougous features that are similar to Earth and this may lead to certain discoverys about the potential of life that may have survived on Venus Since Venus is one of the closest planets to Earth it makes reaching Venus easy but that dosent mean it is like our planet becuse of the atmosphere letting all of the heat inside. If we are able to explore Venus then it may give us confidence to expore other planets that may be like Venus. Finding other lifeforms of materials other than what is already on earth may be huge to humans and give us a boost in what we know as well as have. This is why exploring Venus may be benificial to scientists to make any discoverys that will help the human race and possibly find another planet that sustains life or another planet to live on. Finding clues on Venus about the past may prove as a good thing as well possiblly telling us if planets go through phases where they can sustain life and when they can't. There may possibly be remains of a civilization on the other planets that we do not know about.

Output: Explain the potential benefits of studying Venus for scientists in terms of discovering extraterrestrial life and understanding the planet's past and present conditions. Consider the similarities and differences between Venus and Earth, the challenges of exploring Venus, and the potential for finding clues about the existence of life on other planets.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
The invention of driverless cars is a really good idea. The driverless cars have many developments and improvements. Driverless cars can alert drivers to when something bad is about to happen. The cars are eco friendly because they use half the fuel that taxis use today. With all of the improvements it has, these cars will be one of the safest cars on the road. With all of the improvements on the driverless car the car will be safer. They have invented a track that sends signals to a reciever on the front end of the car. The reason for this is the senors to alert the driver. The senors tell the driver what is all around them. They have developed senors to help alert the driver whne something bad is about to happen. The senors have become more advanced, and are able to detect and respond to the danger of out of control skids or rollovers. The information from the senors can make the car apply the brakes on the individual wheels and reduce the engine's power. The most important piece of technology is the Dubbed LIDAR. It uses laser beams to scan 3-D images of the car constantly. This allows the car to have a better response and control than a human driver alone. General motors has developed driver's seats that vibrate when the vehicle is in danger. With all of the new technolgy being developed, these driverless cars will be safer.
 The driverless cars will be a safer car. These cars have been driven more than half a million miles without a crash. The makers of these cars believe that more states will follow as soon as the cars are proved more reliably safe. The reason for this is the senors to alert the driver. The senors tell the driver what is all around them. Another reason these are good cars, is that they use less fuel than the average car, and it will have more flexibility than a bus. Overall the driverless car is a safer car. It will have the new technology that the other cars do not have. The senors will help alert the driver when there is something behind them or to the side of them. The senors help make this car a safer car for all people. People all around would want this car because it is safe for children and other people. They should develope this car because it si safe for the environment and for other drivers.

Output: Explain the advancements and benefits of driverless cars, including their safety features, eco-friendliness, and technological innovations.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I think for the election for presidency its should be counted on the popular vote. Why I think it should be on the popular vote is because it should count on what the people vote on,not on the electoral college. We should be the people to have the vote on the president and not just a piece of it. Plus the electoral colleges don't even vote on the president,they vote on a slate for the electors who then vote for president.
voting should be on the popular vote now because the electoral colleges are not even voting on the president they're voting on the electors who vote for president. When if there was a direct vote we would then be voting just for the president. Yes sometimes we would vote someone else for president by accident , but not as much as the electoral college does. thats why I think we should have a direct vote instead of having the electoral colleges voting for us pretty much. It just sounds like it would woork better if the people voted for president and not the people voinng for elctors who then vote for the president.

Output: Explain why the popular vote should be used for presidential elections instead of the electoral college. Provide evidence to support your argument and address potential counterarguments.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I think that every student should do community service you do this to help the community not to satisfy your self. Community service is to help people in need that is the real meaning of community service. Also community service is about doing thing with out receiving and not getting anything back because you do it only to help. Also another reason of why the principle should make his students do community service is because if they do not do it they will never do any thing for poor or other people, or if they do service hours they won't do it to help they will just do them because their parents told them. Also the principle should help them see how hard is for other people to live so they will relice that they are lucky have parent or to go to school because there are people who do not have anything. That is why I think the principle should make his students do service hours, so that they can help others.

Output: Explain the importance of community service and why every student should participate in it, including the benefits it provides to both the community and the individual. Additionally, discuss the potential negative consequences of not participating in community service and how it can impact one's perspective on helping others. Finally, provide suggestions for how schools can encourage and facilitate community service among their students.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: It has come to my attention as a student, that you may be changing your policies on cell phone use in school. It is my personal opinion that you should allow student to use their phones outside of class I think this because, myself being a student here, cell phones allow students to contact their families, contact teaching staff stay in touch with one another during school hours. First off, we students are often given difficult projects that we must complete. For example, a group project assigned to two students who don't see each other outside of school hours Wouldn't it be better for these to students to be able to speak to one another during school hours? Secondly, students may need to contact their families during the day A student may be a bus rider, but due to bad weather the student may need to be picked up by car. It would be much easier for this student to be able to use their cell phone then to have to borrow one from a teacher or go to the office. Or they may need to tell their mother or father to turn the stove off or let the dog out. lastly, a student may need to contact a member of the teaching staff for information on a project. Or they may need to ask a question about tonight's homework. Or maybe another student falls and injures themselves, or a fight brakes lose, it would be easy and very convenient to be able to use cell phones in school. To conclude, the use of cell phones during school would be very beneficial for the student population. I hope I have made you see clearer the benefits of allowing us students to use them.

Output: Write an essay arguing for the use of cell phones in school, citing examples of how they can be beneficial for students in terms of communication with peers, family, and teaching staff.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Have you ever wondered about the Face on Mars? You probably told yourself it wasn't real, or you're one of those people who have done their research and love the idea of it being real Well, I'm here today to tell you how it's not created by aliens. Aliens don't exist to our knowledge yet, so therefore we cannot assume that it was made by them.
 First, as we refer back to the 2001 picture, it looks cracked and it looks like it was covered In the 1998 picture, it looked like it was somewhat burning. In the 1976 Viking 1 picture towards the middle of the article, it shows the shadows, making it look like a human face. The eye was caused because of a hole, so it was dark. The nose was caused by the shadow on the right half of the face. Then, NASA knew it was going to get popular very fast, and it did. It was a pop icon all over the world. For example, "It had starred in a Hollywood film, appeared in books, magazines, radio talk shows, even haunted grocery store checkout lines for 25 years!" (5). That goes to show NASA was in it for more fame, because who doesn't want to see a face on Mars? Finally, it's just a natural landform! As the article states, "Thousands of anxious web surfers were waiting when the image appeared first on a JPL web site, revealing . . . a natural landform" (7). You shouldn't always believe what you hear. It wasn't (an) alien(s) who made it. It was a natural landform with a few shadows on it, that's it. Nothing more, nothing less. The Face on Mars wasn't made by aliens. The pictures show it. NASA also just wanted to get popular off of it, because they know how us people are. We'd die to believe anything is true. It's also just a natural landform.

Output: Explain the controversy surrounding the Face on Mars and argue whether or not it was created by aliens. Use evidence from various pictures and sources to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Many kids all over the country talk on cell phones. We use them to communicate with one another. We also use cell phones for emergencies. For example if are out with your friends and you need to talk with one of your parents what do u do? You call them or text them. All though you can use them for urgent cares students at school and adults at work can get distracted bye a cell phone. Policy one states, students are allowed to bring cell phones to school and only use them during lunch and passing period but phones have to be turned off during class time. Policy two states, students are not allowed to have cell phones at all Policy two is a better choice because have a cell phone can be extremely distracting to students and maybe even teachers. School is a department of education to learn new things and life long skills. Students also might get hurt texting on a phone they will be to busy to pay attention to a flight of stairs two steps away. If you decide policy one you might have complaints about cell phones ringing during the middle of class which does not just alarm the owner but also the rest of the class. By picking policy two you have eliminated the disruption for students and have made it easer for students to learn as much as possible.

Output: What are the advantages and disadvantages of allowing students to bring cell phones to school and use them during class time? Compare and contrast two different policies regarding cell phone use in schools and argue for the effectiveness of one policy over the other.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
The author does not support the idea that studyng Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents because he or she provides no explanation of facts stated and creates conflicting ideas that cast a grim shadow on travel to Venus. First, the author doesn't support the idea effectively because he or she presents facts without explaining the significance or importance of them. While describing why scientists consider visits to venus, the author states "Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in out solar system...The value of returning to Venus seems indisputable"(4).
By presenting that scientists want to visit Venus then almost immediately jumping to the weak conclusion that the "value of returning to Venus seems indisputable", the author fails to explain why the scientists want to visit Venus and why those reasons are important or significant.
Without an explanation of facts, writers leave the reader to create conclusions in their own minds, possibly without a complete understanding, weakening the authors support of his or her own claim or idea. Second, the author doesn't support the idea effectively because he or she creates the picture in the reader's mind that successful and worthwhile travel to Venus is nearly impossible and certainly not attainable with today's technology. While writing on what would be necessary for travel and observation of Venus, the author states "a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions...[and be] survivable for humans.
However, peering at Venus from a ship orbiting or hovering safely far above the planet can provide only limited insight on ground conditions...[Also,] standard forms of photography...[would be] innefective...Therefore, sciendtists seeking to...understand Venus would need to get up close and personal despite the risks"(5).
By stating that "a vehicle hovering over Venus" would be safe for humans and then directly stating that it would not be enough and that scientists who want useful information would have to "get up close and personal despite the risks", the author states conflicting ideas.
In addition, earlier in the passage the author states "On the planet's surgace, temperatures average over 800 degrees"(3).
This creates another serious flaw in the author's idea, because the conditions stated are not even close to survivable. Combining the evidence presented by the author would point to the conclusion that astronomers would need to be using vehicles and photography equipment that currently don't exist and, even with unavailable technology, they must be willing to die to travel to Venus for study.
This creates the idea in the reader's head that studying Venus is impossible, which greatly weakens the author's claim.
All in all, impossibilities, conflicting ideas, and a lack of explanation of evidence crontribute to a weak argument in favor of the idea that studing Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents.

Output: Evaluate the author's argument in the passage on the worthiness of studying Venus despite the dangers it presents. Analyze the author's use of evidence and explanation to support their claim and identify any flaws or weaknesses in their argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Distance learning is a good thing it allows kids who can't come to school a chance to get education. This could also become a casual tool that allows kids who missed school to get and stay caught up with their classes People all over the world could benefit from this new form of technology.
 Sometimes as a person with high anxiety, I dont like school because of all the loud and compacted areas. distance learning this allows me to be able to focus somewhere and feel safe This also goes with anything else as well, you dont have to have anything wrong with you to use it. Maybe you wake up one day and realize today isn't a good day, not an issue call in do what you gotta do and attend class online. People who attend school regularly can benefit too Say you miss a day or two of school due to the flu, with distance learning you can be there still while at home taking notes and keeping yourself rested. This could be integrated in many other ways as well, maybe the teacher is out one day or not everyone could go on the field trip. This technology opens a whole new door to the learning world and allows kids to expand and strengthen their education. Kids who cant come to school should all be offered a chance, everyone should have an education and with this new technology you can Third world countries where there's people who have never gotten education will now have that option available. Kids who cant control their lives in those particular places shouldn't be shut off from society. With this we will be able to teach and give knowledge to other people to hopefully make something more beneficial. Distance learning benefits everyone because it makes education more accessible and helpful to all. With this new innovative technology people will be able to build past knowledge and even gain new. people all over the world will be impacted by this technology even if you don't directly use it.

Output: Explain the benefits of distance learning and how it can make education more accessible and helpful to all. Discuss how distance learning can be used as a tool for catching up on missed classes, accommodating students with anxiety or other issues, and providing education to those in third world countries. Analyze the impact of this technology on the learning world and how it can expand and strengthen education for all.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
The use of this technology to read students emotional expressions, is pointless. I say this because a persons emotions could switch very quickly. Also, this technology has been tested on paintings, paintings dont have emotions. This means that the technology is wrong. If a website or app is detecting emotions from picture what makes you think it could detect emotions from a real peson. This "new" technology doesn't make any scense. Why would someone possibly let a machine tell them how there feeling. Theres no way possible that a painting has emotions, it may look sad or happy but it has no true emotions. There are many different apps that do different things. Theres even a app that detects lies. These apps are fake. No cellphone app could really tell you if your lying or not. This technology should be tested out on many humans. Just to be sure.
 Different people have different opinions, but only scientist will actually know the truth. Even scientist can be proven wrong so its more of a the world may never know type of situation. Until actual proof of this technology is being shown i personally will not believe it.

Output: Discuss the effectiveness and reliability of technology that claims to detect emotions in humans, using examples of its testing on paintings and the existence of apps that claim to detect lies. Consider the potential limitations and flaws of such technology and the need for further testing on humans to determine its accuracy.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: People are arguing about keeping the Electoral College or changing to election by popualr votes for the president of the United States. How do we know which one is better or safer? Well, what's it going to be? Keeping the Electoral College or changing to election by popular votes for the president of the United States? In the text In defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the presiden it states that, "The Electoral College is widely regarded as an anachronism, a non-democratic method of selecting a president that ought to be overruled by declaring the candidate who recieves the most popualr votes the winner." This means that The Electoral College is like a person or a thing that seems to belong to the past and it doesnt fit into the president It aslo states that the advocates of the position are correct for agruing that the Electoral College is not a modern sense, it's the electors who elect the president, not the people. In the text The indefensible Electoral College: why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong states that " It's official: The electoral College is unfair, outdated, and irrational." This means that people now know the truth, they think that it is unfair and will not listen to your opinion or anything you have to say about the president or senators you elect.

Output: Evaluate the arguments for and against keeping the Electoral College as the method for selecting the president of the United States versus changing to election by popular vote. Use the articles "In defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the president" and "The indefensible Electoral College: why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong" to support your analysis.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The author studys Venus is a worthy pursuit despite dangers becuse there are many things out there that could be discoverd worth thr dangers. In paragraph 8, it says "Striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only becuse of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also becuse human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally could be explored and lead up to much bigger things. If we dont take the chance and explore we could be passing up many great discoverys, such as a new plant that couls help cure canser or even a animal that could help save the enviotment. Many people may say they dont want to risk peoples lifes or to scared of what could go wrong This is a risk that should be takes becuase if not there is a chance we could missout on a discover that could do big things. "our travels on earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation" is what was stated in the story saying this is a big project we dont want nor need to miss out on. moral of the stoy we need to get out there and discover new things.

Output: Explain why the pursuit of studying Venus is worth the potential dangers, and how it could lead to significant discoveries that could benefit humanity. Use evidence from paragraph 8 of the text to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Aliens are real, Frank I'm telling you. The aliens made that face on Mars. Why do you think that, Grayson? No one can step on Mars. If a person steps on Mars, they will die. No one has ever been to Mars, Still to this day. Are you sure about what you are saying? I'm sure about this. Aliens live in the galaxy. They can step on any planet whenever they want to and not die. Well I have something to say. Aliens do not exist. If they were real, they would have took over the world. They would have been making us do work every single day. f they came here they would probaly have killed us by now. Have they killed us, have they started making us do work? No, they haven't. Grayson? Yes, Sir? I heard you and Kevin talking about how aliens made that face on mars. Both of you are wrong. You were right about the no aliens part, but everything else was wrong. We just now figured out that it was just another Martian mesa. It is common enough in Cydonia. When we took the picture, I have got a lot of e-mails saying "what is that thing?" I even got a e-mail from Michael Bay saying that he is going to use that image for a movie. This stuff is crazy! The picture is accually the Martian of a butte or mesa. It's common across the American west. I hope we can find more stuff like that. Me too that was a wierd experience.

Output: Write an essay discussing the existence of aliens and their potential ability to step on planets without dying, using the conversation between Grayson and Frank as a starting point. Consider the evidence presented in the conversation and any additional research you may conduct. Discuss the possibility of aliens taking over the world and making humans do work, and address the recent discovery that the face on Mars was actually a Martian mesa.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I believe that students should perform community service. Students like me have it to easy. Now don't get me wrong students do work hard, However not hard enough Lets take my friend for example he does no work at home or at school, Yet he still has a playstation three. He lives in Atlantic City New Jersey. He tells me that there is plastic and all sorts of litter on the ground and there is no one there to pick it up. Right here in Central Islip there is litter on the ground and I see no one pick it up. I am upset to see this. I want people to come in Central Islip and say what a clean city with educated kids. Not what a dirty city with stupid kids. In conclusion, I believe that if you make community service mandatory Central Islip will be the cleanest city in at least five years.

Output: Write an essay discussing the benefits of mandatory community service for students, using personal experiences and observations to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Have you ever been stuck in a difficult situation, and it seems like you'll never get out? Next time when your in something like that try consulting multiple people over just one. You would do this because getting multiple peoples opinions can help prevent the out come from being bias help you get a better perspective of whats actually happening in someones else point of view. If it's politics or a certain friend. Point is everyone has something that they care a lot about, but sometimes that something they care a lot about can become bias to a situation. If your ever in a tough spot or in an argument get multiple peoples thoughts on the situation so you know its not bias. It will help better the out come, and it may also help you make the right choice. If you get multiple perspectives you can see the situation from different spots to help you better understand it. Also it will help you get more knowledge on the subject. Then you can understand what is going on all around not just in your head. This will help by making it more understandable When asking for advise talk to multiple people so that you; Avoid bias opinions, and you can get multiple perspectives on the situation. These things will help better your opinions, and help you make the right choice.

Output: Explain the benefits of consulting multiple people when faced with a difficult situation or argument. Provide examples of how getting multiple perspectives can prevent bias and help gain a better understanding of the situation. Discuss how this can lead to making better decisions and improving one's opinions.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Asking for advice from different people can help people make better choices. Asking multiple people for advice can give someone a better solution to their problem that they might not have thought to use or help them make a correct decision between two choices. Even if a person is faced with an easy decision like choosing an outfit, sometimes they might just want a little help deciding. It is always good to make the best decision possible and asking multiple people can help people make decisions. Asking for advice from multiple people can give people different ways to resolve their problems A shy person may have a different view than a super chatty person. For example, my friend skipped four questions in an english assignment; she hit submit on her computer and got four questions wrong because she did not see them. She could not talk to the teacher because she had a substitute that day. She asked two friends, one was a little shy and the other one was super chatty. The shy friend said to email her teacher telling her what my friend accidently did, the other friend said that she should wait until the teacher was back and talk to her in person. She did not think of emailing her teacher and explaining what happened. It is more likely she would have waited until her teacher was back and then not gotten full credit on her assignment. Talking to multiple people gave her a solution that she would not have thought to use and worked better better than her original idea.
 Sometimes people need advice choosing between two solutions for their problems. If someone can't decide which is the better solution for their problem, asking multiple people can help. An example of this would be when I got invited to two birthday parties on the same day that were almost the same time. One birthday party was for my friend who I had not seen in a little over a month, while while the other birthday party was for my cousin who I saw quite often, but I would feel bad missing his party. I asked three friends whether I should go to my cousin's or my friend's birthday party. Two of my friends said to go to my friend's birthday party and one of my friends said to go to my cousin's birthday party. I decided to go to my friend's birthday party because I hadn't seen her in a while and I missed her. I also decided I would take my cousin out to dinner to celebrate his birthday. I am very glad that I talked to my friends because they helped me make the best choice that was possible. In conclusion, asking for advice from multiple people can help a person make the best choice possible. Whether it is an easy or a hard decision everyone needs advice at somepoint and asking more than one person can help decision making. If someone needs help deciding between two things, or thinking of a solution to their problem, asking multiple people can make their decision a little easier. With all the decisions people make in life, making every decision as easy as possible is the best thing people can do.

Output: Explain how asking for advice from multiple people can help individuals make better decisions and provide examples to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Heres something you might be interested in doing activities outside that you may have never wanted to do before. yes you should do extracurriculars you could get out of the house more, do something that your really passoinate about and could maybe do that for a living when your older, you could try new things and expiernce things you havent expierenced before.
 You dont always have to be excersizing to be outside or doing something other than being in your house all day. When you get out of the house you think about things like walking the dof through the neighborhood, or dropping your kids off with thier friends somewhere but you never really think about other things you could be doing when your not busy. You could hands down take a long walk around the neighborhood matter fact you could even jog/run,You could pick up some trash around the neighborhood and watch the ecosystem and get out more.
 So what im saying is if you find the right thing for you your out of the ball park. You have a chance to get away from the world and do what you love doing when your not doing school work or other things like that. You have a chance t be yourself without people judging everything little thing that goes on in your life. Plus if your really goos at it you could do your passion for a living whe your older like you could get a job that has something to do with something your really interested in and getting paid a little better than you would doing something thats not fun at all. You could try things that you usually wouldnt try when you are staying at home playignvideo games and watching netflix in your room. And maybe if you try the right thing you will really get into it and keep getting better at whatever your interested in. Sometimes your sitting at home bored because you dont spend enough time doing other things like for exam[ple you could go out side and do a couple laps around your house to get a little bit more energy out. All I can tell you is when you find something your interested in you will know it because your gonna want to do it 24/7. I hope that you really take into consideration doing some extracurriculars. You would really like doing something your interested in instead of just sitting around at home ding absolutely nothing. Some people just take awhile to find what their interested in but when they find it they stick with it until the day they can't anymore.

Output: Write an essay discussing the benefits of participating in extracurricular activities outside of the home. Consider the potential for discovering new passions, gaining valuable experiences, and improving physical and mental health. Use personal anecdotes and examples to support your argument.