Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
A lot of people like to go do things on their own,but asking people for advice is a more effective way then trying to do everything on your own. The reason going to multiple people is more effective than trying to figure out everything on ones own people can get different perspectives, better explanations talk to people who are more mature and understand better. If a person tries something new they might be a little scared, it would be better to ask for advice from more than one person because that person could get there different opinions on the situation. A person could also get a better explanation because one may not help that person fully so another person might explain it better. When a person needs help they may be immature and not understand how to do certain things so when other people are more mature and understand better they might be able to help more.
 a person could get there different perspectives. That person will get to know how people look at things from their view and how they see it so then that person could take one of their perspectives and look at it as their own. Another reason would be more options, if a person had more options from different people it will make things a little easier to do things. If somebody has to speak in front of a crowd they might have a fear of public speaking, so if they ask others who have done it before how they did it with such confidence they will have peoples different ways of how they overcame stage fright and they could find which way works best for them and use it. Having peoples different perspectives on things really help because one will have more options and with that comes how others look at things and so much more with any of those things. they can get a better explanation A person might not be sure how to something so they ask multiple people because one did not explain good enough and left things out. When people don't fully explain things like a person wants them too or like they need them too everyone that person asked might end up putting everything they said together as one or one person may explain it deeper and get into more details than anyone else. A person might want to learn how to sail and their parents know how to sail, but they know other people who sail better than their parents but their parents want to teach them so they could ask their parents to help them sail and anything that was left out they could ask the other people that they know. When someone gets a better explanation on something they don't know, it feels great to know that they know what they are doing and that they are doing it right.
 they can get advice from a more mature person . Age comes with maturity so if a person asked other people and they don't know then asking people who are older and who have more experience will mos likely mean that the person will get better advice. since some people have more knowledge than other people a person knows they will most likely be able to help more because that means they know more than you and can help more. A person might be getting in to trouble at school and their friends want to help but don't understand why that person is getting in to trouble so they don't know how to help but that persons mom is older and wiser so she understands why they are getting in to trouble and knows what to say and how exactly to help. If one talks to older and wiser then they will get better advice from different people. Those are the reasons why talking to more people will help one more than just listening to them self and only doing what they think is right. All of those reasons connect to each other because if a person listens to peoples different perspectives then they will have a better explanation from more mature people. There are limits to why a person should take advice from multiple people, only that person knows them self clearly so that's why sometimes people have a hard time listening to others. It is still better to take ones chances of failure listening to others trying to help rather than not try at all and fail with no fight. Those are my reasons for why people should take others advice and not just there own.

Output: Explain the benefits of seeking advice from multiple people rather than relying solely on one's own perspective when faced with a new or challenging situation. Use examples to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I believe that yes we should keep the electoral college. To take it away would be wrong to me i have many reasons why and pay attention to find out why i believe we should keep the electoral college. To start off why wouldn't you want to keep the electoral college to me that's a sign of are freedom. The ones who don't know what an electoral college is we will get there soon just stick around. I am arguing that yes we should keep it because its important. The electoral college is the right to selecting/voting for president and vice president and people like that. Now to began on with the reasons i think it is important is that's a sign of are freedom to me that gives us a right to vote for who we want running this economy. Not being able to vote for this kind of thing could be bad because when we vote for the people we want running this economy we are choosing wisely because we don't want this town or anything to come crashing to the ground because of some man or woman who really doesn't care about the people they just want their name to be heard. Some may disagree with what I've had to say but they clearly didn't think about it to much. Also some people really don't care about who gets elected they just don't care nor do they wanna vote at all and most don't. When someone votes to me that's a good thing because we have went through all this freedom stuff and then were able to vote and no many people want to vote that's pretty ridiculous if u ask me that's a sign of freedom like I've said before and when we go through a lot just to get u this grant of freedom and people just throw it away that's a sign of disrespect. I know that me being young and not able to vote yet and probably not making any since at all is probably making who ever is reading this mad but i wasn't put here to be taken right back out at a young age i was put here to live a life that was chosen for me and when people who are to dumb to realize it don't vote or at least don't try makes me mad because their not seeing what there doing just going in there and putting what ever name down on a ballot is wrong but going in there knowing a little information and choosing the person you think would make a good leader is fine. People wonder why are world is so messed up and they don't realize it but its messed up because we made it messed up we had the choice to make it better but we chose to make it worse see taking away the electoral college is taking away are rights to make are community a better place and no one sees it but the ones who actually care and who are with me on this. People could show me a million articles on why we should do away with it but i will still agree with keeping because we didn't come this far as a community to just throw it all away and let people who don't care take away are freedom and rights to helping the community out and choosing wisely about are world and trying to keep are community as clean as possible and as safe as possible.
 Well you have just heard my argument on why i think we should keep the electoral college and not do away with it because some people just don't care. I know that who ever is reading this could think differently about what i had to say and they may be saying this fourteen year old has no idea what shes talking about and they may be right but i know that when my time comes to be able to vote i will be there and i will be choosing who i think will be the best and i will care.

Output: Write an essay arguing for or against the retention of the electoral college in the United States presidential election system. Provide reasons for your stance and support your argument with relevant examples and evidence.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Every teacher should use this in their class room because the teacher could see what each student is feeling inside Also the teacher could see if the student is learning,listening, or even liking what the subject is It says "moving your facial muscles not only expresses emotions, but also may even help produce them''. I think that is very true and hopefully it would make people more happy and not feel like they are nothing.
 If people could make enough of the Facial Action Coding System for the schools all around the world. I think that would make a big difference on people not lieing about how the feel. It would help people be better with computers if the computers understand howthe person if feeling. It would me a great game too. You try to make the other person try to guess your emotion and the computer would tell you if they got it right or not I think this would be really good to get out to schools to show them how to see different emotions about people and like i said before, it would make a great game.

Output: Discuss the potential benefits of implementing the Facial Action Coding System in classrooms and how it could improve communication between teachers and students.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The author seems to be an advocate for studying Venus despite its dangers, and even gives some ideas as to how humans could study Venus without ever touching the extremely volatile surface. The author gives some examples of solutions that the people at NASA have found might be solutions to the problem at hand, and some reasons as to why exploration of our nearest planet is worthwhile. He talks about one of NASA's many possible solutions, saying "NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray." What he is talking about is a vehicle that would hover above Venus so it would never touch the surface. The reason why studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers is because "it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system." Even today it has features similiar to that of Earth, like its rocky surface, mountains, and craters Another possible solution to researching Venus while trying to avoid its harsh terrain is using old technology, used in World War II, and putting this old technology into a new use. The author says the reason these might help the future of exploring Venus because "Modern computers are enormously powerful, flexible, and quick, but tend to be more delicate when it comes to extreme physical conditions." these might be more resistant to whats in store for them on Venus. While the challenges of visiting Venus are certainly disheartening, the value of visiting and exploring Earth's "twin", and one of its closest planets is impossible to know, but the pursuit of knowledge of the planet would make it a worthwhile endeavor. The only thing we know is that impeding danger can not stop our thirst for knowledge, and may even spark it.

Output: Discuss the potential benefits and challenges of studying Venus, as outlined by the author in the given essay. Analyze the proposed solutions for exploring Venus without touching its volatile surface, including the use of hovering vehicles and old technology. Evaluate the author's argument for the value of studying Venus despite its dangers, and consider the potential impact of such exploration on our understanding of the solar system.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
The Electoral College was created with good intentions, but it has many vital flaws which allow for very unfair outcomes. The electoral college is an outdated, and irrational way to choose the president of our country for the next four years you can win the presidency with a mere fourty percent of the country in support of you You can completely ignore some of your voters, as you're guaranteed to either win or lose heavily biased states, and you can gain massive numbers of electoral votes due to one more vote for a side in a state count system even allows for massive corruption to go unpunished, which is one of the biggest offenses in our country. The electoral college's biggest flaw may perhaps be its ability to elect a president that doesn't even appeal to half of the country According to source two, Al Gore "won the popular vote but lost the presidency." Al Gore had a signifigant victory in popular vote for the nation, yet still was denied presidency due to the electoral college's vote assignment system. If we did away with the electoral college, each and every person would have an equal say, and would be equally important to the candidates.  Even source three agrees that the trust in our electors is occasionally betrayed, albiet rarely.
 Republicans have a strongly biased voter base in the south - so much so that generally speaking, the Republicans never have a single rally or major ad. According source two, states like South Carolina almost never vote Democrat. It's so rare, that if you lost, you offended the group that has voted unquestioningly for your party since the system has been put into place. If the electoral college system didn't exist, the thirty percent of southern Democrats would have a say, which would make advertising and campaigning all over the country much more vital. The electoral college system also allows for an astonishing amount of corruption with no punishment If a state manages to vote one hundred percent Democrat, rogue electors can still cast their vote for the Republican candidate - and this isn't against the rules. We're essentially putting the next four years of our country into the hands of 538 electors, and holding them to the lowest possible degree of accountability. Again, source three clearly states "and that trust is rarely betrayed." While it's rare, it's still more than possible, and can be quite disasterous.
 Some may argue that the electoral college system puts into place a system of certainty and safety, for both the candidates and the people This, however, is quite far from the truth. According to source three, "the residents of other regions are likely to feel disenfranchised." While this source claims that ignoring biased parts of the population, this is quite far from the truth People are being entirely ignored by the powerful politicians that are supposed to represent them. That doesn't sound very democratic and fair to me. People begin to feel discouraged and that their vote doesn't count, and this is quite close to the being the case. Only one-half of elligable citizens voted in the 2012 election, which means that one half didn't. Half of our country isn't bothering to vote in the elections because the electoral college system completely negates their vote. Our country prides itself on being "the land of the free, and the home of the brave," yet our people are being discouraged at every turn by our government. The popular opinion of our people is that the government is out to get us, and there's not much evidence to contradict that. The electoral college system allows for the government to be run by men who didn't fairly win over our country, and isn't accurately representing our views. It's rife with corruption, and allows money to buy power. If we remove this system in favor of a popular vote election would encourage more popular policy, make our government closer to the people, and have little to no negative impact on our country.

Output: Explain the flaws of the Electoral College system and argue for the implementation of a popular vote election system in the United States.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Imagine you get a letter from the principal of the school. It says that students must participate in extracurricular activities. You think to yourself my kids should do that they need to get out of the house. You say "oh man my kids need to get a life." We should have students participate in at least one extracurricular activity they learn about the activity the're doing and how it will affect them getting jobs they learn to work in teams, they can make friends If we have students participate in extracurricular activities they will get an idea of what it's like to work in that kind of job. An example if you're helping make the year book you get to learn how to use editing software. kids wouldn't get this opportunity if they never wanted to do it in the first place. But, if it's mandatory you wouldn't need to worry about this because the school would do you a favor. If your kid doesn't want to do it the activities eventually get better and more fun so it'll rope them into it.
 If your kid is shy nothing is better than getting them some experience with talking. They'll be doing a lot more talking when they join an activity they'll never wanna leave. They get to work in teams and talk to each other and have fun. whenever they get into the real world they'll need to know how to work with people. It may be hard for them to listen to that much talking but it builds their endurance to withstand that amount of talking. Did i mention they can also make friends if schools don't make you do those activities most kids won't have friends. It's really hard to make friends but if you're seeing the same people everyday during those activities you form a bond. If you don't want your kid to have friends you can always tell them to not make any friends. But, whats the harm in making friends. They can make friends if you want them to and it'll be a lot easier to because you're close to other people. we should have students participate in at least one extracurricular activity because they get experience in the activity the're doing, they learn to work in teams, and they can make friends. Extracurricular activities help kids get an idea of the job they want. It's a good place to learn how to work in teams and communicate with each other. You can make a lot of friends there by working with your team. Would you want to join an extracurricular activity if it was mandatory?

Output: Explain the benefits of mandatory participation in extracurricular activities for students, including how it can provide experience in a particular activity, teach teamwork and communication skills, and facilitate the formation of friendships. Use examples to support your argument and consider potential objections to mandatory participation.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The using of cars has caused much of the worlds green house gas imitions, in America as much as 50% of the imitions are caused souly by transportation. Many people feel that this is destroying our atmosphere and that we should cut down on imitions by walking, biking or car pooling. Efforts to cut down keep our atmosphere clean and breathable. Some communities such as Vauban, Germany have illiminated car use entirely. Vauban is a new experimental suburb where there is no street parking or driveways and the only place to park is in a garage where you must buy a space for 40,000 which has cut the car ownership rate down to only about 30%. There are as many as 5,500 residents in Vauban and most of them say they like it much better without having to worry about a car. In many suburbs however the houses are much to far apart for them to be car-free, though many areas are considering developments like this one so they can clean up the air. Other cities, such as Paris, are fourced to ban driving for days at a time in order to clear the thick smog that hovers above the city. On one day odd numbered plates won't be allowed to drive and on the next day even, volaters are fined $31. As many as 4,000 drivers are fined. Only once the smog was sufficently cleared did they allow both plate types to drive. Limiting driving can prevent problems like this from occuring in all cities. In Colombia they have a day where all cars are banned, chalanging the inhabitance to find alternate routs of travel for fear of the $25 fine for violators. The day without cars began in the mid-1990's for Bogota, a city with a population of 7 million, has participated, but last year two other cities in Colombia joined in. Dispite the rainy weather many people still hiked or rode their bikes. Many citizens say that it keeps the cities air clear and that its nice to have a day without traffic jams filling the streets. The Day without cars is an event that many countries hope to adopt. Studies show that many people from the newest generation aren't bothering to get a licence. Cell phones and apps make car pooling easy and the internet allows you to interact with friends without having to drive to visit them. Experts are hoping this trend will continue and that it will cut down the gas imitions. With increased use of social networking technology hopefully people will also become more aware of how they are affecting their planet and move to help others cut down as well.

Output: Explain the impact of transportation on greenhouse gas emissions and the environment, including the example of Vauban, Germany, and the day without cars in Colombia. Discuss the potential benefits of limiting driving and the trend of younger generations not obtaining driver's licenses.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I firmly believe that we should keep the Electoral College. Many people say that it is "outdated, irrational, and unfair" but that is an opion.  Their are meany rational reasons about why the Electoral College is benificaial rather then destructive. Everyones President Swing States.
 "The Electoral College requires a presidential candidate to have a trans-reginal appeal.  No region (South, Northeast, etc.) has enough electoral votes to elect a president." In PLumers article he states that, "candiadtes dont spend time in states they know they have no chance of winning, focusing only on the the tight races in the "swing" states. The Electoral College assures that the President isnt just wanted in one area that is wanted all around the country.  Electoral Colleges assure that the President is wanted in many differt parts of the United States. Some people argue about the Electoral College turning off potential voters, but this may actually determine the election.  If those other party people dont vote who knows mabey if they had voted their party might have been luckly.  Statistics prove that when certaint parties win contriversial states thats because some people from 1 party didnt vote. No voting especailly in swing states can make your party, or your wanted candiadate loose the election.  Every year some of the swing states change so everyone should vote especially those in the swing states to insure your party or your candidate win. The Electoral College is something that this country needs for our benifit.  It helps us Americas get a President that will benifit us all not just those in certaint areas.  Although some peopel dont think that the Electoral College is helping there are twice as many people who believe that just a popularity vote is a bad idea.  Having swing states, and having a way that finds "everyones" president are just few of the many exaples about why we need the Electoral College.

Output: Explain the benefits of the Electoral College system in electing the President of the United States, including its ability to ensure a trans-regional appeal and prevent candidates from focusing solely on certain areas. Discuss the potential consequences of not voting, particularly in swing states, and how the Electoral College can help to mitigate these issues. Finally, argue for the importance of the Electoral College in ensuring that the President is wanted in many different parts of the country and not just in certain areas.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Do you really think student's would like to complete summer projects over the summer? Me personally i would hate to even think about having some type of extra work in the summer, I know sometimes in the summer, were bored and can't wait to start school there's times where we want summer to hurry up and come around, because were drained mentally, physically, and emotionally because of the thought, we have work to finish up, make sure you turn it in on time before the due date and focus on maintaining to keep your grades looking good and not disappointing,. no teacher nor student would like to do a summer project over the summer. Because i know some people can't go out, hang out with friends because their parents are too stricked; or they're furious about letting their kids out at a certain time even though they can have a bed time but some parent's just can't risk anything i'm talking out of experience because my parent's are like that, it's not fun at all. But honestly you'll thank them later on as you get older or when you have kids because, how society now days is set up is crazy! , i tell you. Then, we started school, for example "September 4, 2019" is the first day we enrolled in school then give it a few months into the school year "January 11, 2020". let me tell you, the first day of school was memorable, seeing the pleasant faces of missed friends and teachers was probably the best, but as soon you get later into the year it's not so jolly anymore, your're DRAINED the feeling that you just want to drop out, give up, you dress like you don't love yourself because of the amount of stress on school work, the end of year state test's, so you can't help but to say "I can't wait for summer" out of your mouth most defiantly not the teachers nor the students, we have been learning for months and i know teachers are sick, tired and cant wait to catch a break, don't get me wrong we need to gain knowledge everyday but after all the months we've been learning and teachers staying after to grade our papers and assign are next assignment when we come in class is a call, a call that we need a break. The moral of the story is no, no i don't think teacher's nor student's should be required to complete a summer project over the summer, it's too much for them and i'm pretty sure their brain needs some type of break, you know? vise verse. I hope the schools that require this assignment should think about there decision a little more. Respectfully.

Output: Should students be required to complete summer projects over the summer break? Provide reasons for your answer.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I think the driverless car is a waste of time you do not even get a insure that your safe when you get in the car. In the text it states in most states it illegal to test compuer made cars. What driver would want to be in a csr thats not even tested to see if it does not shut down on commands or to notify if you are in danger of getting hit or close to backing up on a car.
 The car can not even drive on its own around construction sites or around heavy traffic jams that what type of car people would buy without question. If the car can not move around or hit the brakes when your in serious danger than why even get it. Its jus a waste or your money and time and you can not inusre your safety. The biggest thing that about the cars is you do not even know if you can sue the company for car failure. I believe the only the car good for giving your leg a rest from the peddle but that what we have cruise control for. The car is junk and have no need for people daily life and should not be out for a drive. alot of people will get hurt or worse for a untested car thats legal on the street.

Output: Discuss the potential safety concerns and legal issues surrounding the use of driverless cars, including the lack of testing and insurance options, and the potential for accidents in heavy traffic or construction zones. Evaluate the author's argument that driverless cars are a waste of time and money, and consider whether there are any potential benefits to their use.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I believe that the principal should go with policy one and allow students to have cell phones at school. Yes i think that you should let kids have cell phones at school and no do i think they should be allowed to use in class. Students should be allowed to have cell phones but only during lunch or there free period. I agree that the cell phones need to be turned off in class so it does not distract students from there school work. Teenagers will enjoy school more if they are allowed cell phones in school. Now if the texting begins to be a problem in class then i think you should take away the rule and allow no cell phones in school. But i doubt it will be a problem since teenagers love there cell phones and do not want them taken away. Teenagers like to communicate over text so if one doesn't know where the other is then the can text each other and get together. Another reason is that students will need to call parents or other students to get a ride home or if the parent is late picking them up they can call them and know where they are and why there late without worrying about getting there phones confiscated. Well that sums up why i think you should allow students to have cell phones.

Output: Should students be allowed to have cell phones in school? Write an essay stating your opinion on whether or not cell phones should be allowed in school and under what circumstances they should be permitted. Consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of allowing cell phones in school, as well as any policies or rules that should be put in place to regulate their use.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Everyday people die in car accidents because they use cell phones while driving.
According to research cell phones are leading factors that cause accidents. Studies show that a cell phone puts drivers at a four time greater risk of a crash. Despite the danger, people still use cell phones because they want to always be available and keep in touch with other people Also, they think that a hand-free set is safe because they can drive using two hands. However, they use arguments that cell phones are necessary in emergency situations Although some people support using cell phones while driving, there is evidence that they are dangerous and people should avoid talking while driving.
 Opponents whose work depends on a cell phone like lawyers or businessmen say that they always have to be available to answer the phone to keep their business running. However, because of their habits, they can create dangerous and hazardous situations like a collision or an accident Business issues can be stressful and dangerous while driving because it can cause emotional reactions that can lead to a tragedy. Because of the conversation they might get upset and this can lower their driving ability that can lead to losing control over the car. "Even though we as humans recognize that talking or texting on a cell phone or using social media apps while driving is unsafe, they often engage in these behaviors anyway"(Foss and Teft). So if people don't make a decision to put away their cell phones their routine can harm innocent people. Opponents also say that a hands-free set is safe because people can drive using two hands However, hands-free devices don't eliminate the risk of causing an accident and even may it worsen by suggesting that the behavior is safe. Research shows that using a headset can be as dangerous as holding a phone because the conversations distracts drivers from focusing on the road. "In 2017, distracted driving was reported in crashes that killed 3,166 people (8.6 percent of all facilities), although many instances may go unreported" (Foss and Teft). It's also proven that people talking over the phone image of the person who they are talking to and that doesn't interfere with driving. The problem is when a car swerves unexpectedly or pedestrians step into traffic, and the mind lacks the processing power to react in time. So the problem isn't in holding the wheel and cell phone at the same time which may cause an accident because of lack of manoeuvre, it is because of conversation and lack of reaction at the particular time. Opponents say that cell phones are good because they give an opportunity to make a call in case of emergency. However, it is an illusion of safety because when people need it the most either they can't find it or reach it because they are stuck in a car. "Texting while driving is the most dangerous activity on the road, even more dangerous than drinking and driving" ("Injured in a Car Accident by Someone Using a Cell Phone"). People shouldn't fully depend on cell phones because they are not reliable."You cannot drive safely unless the task of driving has your full attention. Any non-driving activity you engage in is a potential distraction and increases your risk of crashing"(Andrew Currin). Therefore, nowadays cell phones are unnecessary devices because they are unreliable in emergency situations . Concluding, if people don't give up cell-phones the number of fatalities on the roads will still increase. It is people's responsibility to not incur their own and other people's lives.

Output: What are the dangers of using cell phones while driving and how do they contribute to car accidents? How do arguments for the necessity of cell phones while driving hold up against research and statistics? What are the potential consequences of not giving up cell phones while driving and what can be done to prevent these accidents?


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: if i had to choose i would change to election vote  cause it is more popular and it has less problems unlike the other  cause when you do electoral college you have to do lots ofdifferent things that is not worth doing other people are saying how good the electoral college is if its so good why do you so many issues with things that happen to people thats what i dont understand they dont let some people vote cause there age which is stupid they should  let them vote thats the reason why ther areso many disputes in the world cause of the ignorance of some people and the only thing the people from electoral college is worried about iswinning instead of carring for the other people which is not right that is the reason so many outbreaks happen cause people start to not even give a crap about the people that is wanting to vote but the people is not worriedtwo cents about what anyone else thinks their just worried bout  themselves which is stupid and they should have been done something about this before it get to much out of control which is leading to much more problems it needs to come to a end and pick a president who would actually give a care about the people of the united states  instead them going around and talking about them in different ways that is not needed cause only a majority of people votes for him doesnt mean that he or she has to be a complete jerk to them and start talking bout them in bad ways that is how many fights start and when they start they dont ever stop talking bout it for a long period of time which pisses people off what if someone started talking bout you or your parents you would want to beat the crap out of them then there would be catastrophic failure which leadsto more and more drama which just makes things even worse nominees get happy that they won the vote and start getting all crazy and start saying things just to get people all ticked off and things that really didnt meanto happen happens to people that did not even do anything to hurt that person at all which is messed up cause they dont give no effort to even say they are sorry for what they did to that person the advocates that are in the position they say things that make arguements and other things that dont need to happen begin which doesnt make things any easier it just causes more drama that doesnt need to happen cause even more trouble that is not a good thing to have happen when that happens it just has bad things happening everywhere and it only makes things worse which leads to cause even more drama in peoples life and it doesnt seem fun getting out of all that drama that happened

Output: Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the electoral college system in comparison to a popular vote system for electing the President of the United States. Consider the potential issues with the electoral college system, such as voter disenfranchisement and the potential for a candidate to win the presidency without winning the popular vote. Additionally, analyze the potential benefits of a popular vote system, such as increased voter participation and a more direct representation of the will of the people. Finally, consider the potential drawbacks of a popular vote


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
" The "Face on Mars" has since become a pop icon. it has starred in hollywood film, apperes in books magazines, radio talks shows-even haunted grocery store cheakout lines for 25 years!
Some peole think the Face is bona fide evidence of life on Mars- evidence that NASA would rather hide, say conpiracy theorists." siad NASA. The face on mars was not made by aliens beacuse it was illusion, shadows camera"s The face on mars was not made by aliens beacuse it was an illusion The crises on the eyes was an illsion beacuse the shadows a cused by the hole and how the light is hitting it.
" A few days later NASA unveiled the image for all to see. The caption noted a " huge rock formation. . . whic resenbles a human head. . . formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth." said the author. illision was caused by how our eyes sees it. our brian is capitbal to form faces on anything that has a human characteristics. The face on mars was not made by aliens beacuse it was shadows. when it , viking 2, spotted the shadowy likeness of a human face." the shadows made the faces but in realtiy the is just a rock there not a face.
" The Face on Mars is located at 41 ddegres north martian laditue where it was winter, in April 98- a clody time of the year." said th author.
Where the rock is located it make a shade that looks like a face it is always cloudy there. The Face on Mars was not made by aliens beacuse of the camer's. Malin 's team captured an extaordinary photo using the camera's absoulte maximum resolution, eac pixel in 2001 image spans 1.56 meters, compared to 43 meters per pixel in the best 1976 viking photo." the photo matter they took another picture on a cloudyness day and the face was kinda gone and the camera ws also the key. the camers couldhave caused a big differance in the picture. The face was not made by aliens beacuse it was and illusion by the shadows and the camera. The camers was a big part. the shadows was caused by clouds. The illusion was a brain game. The face on Mars was not made by aliens beacuse it was an illusion, shadows, and camer's.

Output: Explain why the "Face on Mars" is not evidence of life on Mars, citing the role of illusions, shadows, and cameras in creating the image.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Imagine you are stuck on a problem and you can't figure out what to do? So you need some advice, would you ask one person or multiple people for advice? When it comes to advice I ask multiple people for opinions when i'm stuck on a problem. Well because I might not totally agree with one of the opinions so having more than one choice is good to think about Advice people can give sometimes isn't the greatest or just it doesn't get to you so, you can move on to ask more people for opinions. Friends are always good to talk to about problems you might have or advice you might need. Asking one person is good but, what if you don't like the sound of it. You are only going to think of that advice only. Seeking for multiple opinions would be a good idea because people could give you many more opinions to choose from Talking to you parents, friends, or councilors in your school is a great way to talk about your problems. They can always try to give you advice when you need it. Seeking for more opinions is always great for you to think about. Many people have different opinions and reasons to support their answers. Make sure to talk to someone when you need some advice for your problems. It can also make your life easier because choices matter. You can also listen to yourself as well.

Output: Explain the benefits of seeking advice from multiple sources when faced with a problem, and compare it to seeking advice from only one source. Use personal experiences and examples to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Our world is becoming more and more automatic. Everyday things that people use to take an hour to do can now be done by a machine without any labor involved. This can make things easier and seemingly better, until something goes wrong. These ways of doing things automatically have hidden problems that are not good about them, much like the driverless car. Driverless cars are not a good thing the extra cost, the complicated maininence, the possible safety hazards. The radar on the top of these driverless cars cost 200 million dollars to devolope, as stated in the article. That is just more money added to the cost of these cars. That is not even counted the many more electronic softwear that has to go in these cars in order for them to drive themselves. As many people know, electronics are expensive these days, and adding a whole bunch more to these driverless cars will make the price skyrocket, which is why I am opposed to them. When people are driving their own car correctly and how they should, they can see everything around them, and if something were to go wrong, they can manuever however they want to in order to avoid the problem at hand or stop it as soon as possible. Also, there are so many things to take into acount when driving. Such as the sudden moves of people or animals or other cars, and a person can also adapt their driving in certain weather conditions, which was not mentioned about the driverless car in the article. If there was no way that someone could avoid an accident and they had to drive into a ditch in order to get out of harms way, there would not be alot of damage done. the cost of the extra electronic parts of these cars is more than enough to dislike them, but now emagine if one of these parts were to go out, now your self driving car cannot function properly. Fixing electronic problems are very expensive, as sensors for various vehicles today can cost over one thousand dollars. And we are dealing with more complicated technology than just a single sensor. These electronical problems are the most complicated to fix, and that means that they cost a whole lot more to fix than a normal, easy mechanical problem like a spark plug. Why can't people just sit back and enjoy the ride and the pleasure of driving? If taught correctly, this is the safest bet. The cost of electronics for a self driving car are very expensive, and a human driver that is aware of his surroundings and how those surroundings react when driving is far more safe that a self driving car. The maintenence of the expensive electronics will be a mechanics demise when one of these magic cars come rolling in the shop. Which is why I am against self driving cars because of the extra expence, the risk in safety, and the cost of maintenece.

Output: Discuss the potential drawbacks of automatic technology in our world, using the example of driverless cars as a case study. Consider the extra cost, complicated maintenance, and possible safety hazards associated with these vehicles. Compare and contrast the benefits and drawbacks of human-driven cars versus self-driving cars, and argue for or against the adoption of driverless cars in society.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
The electoral college in many peoples eyes is a good thing but, there is a majority of other people who would much rather have a more direct vote because all though one president got the popular vote among the voters, the electoral votes count differently. One direct vote could count for ten votes or it could count for two votes and most people would rather have their vote count as just their vote. Electoral votes in a lot of peoples minds is just unfair all around. One president could be the favorite among the voters but the electors the president has to back him up with electoral votes could maybe not be as big as another presidents electors and its pretty much, in many peoples eyes, giving the least popular among the people president an easier way to become president. Adults that vote like knowing that their vote really counts for the person theyre voting for. That is why people would much rather have a direct way of voting than the electoral college which is taking one vote from one person, and say there are thirty electors in that one slab for the person you voted for, and giving that person thirty votes for the person they want elected. People find this way of voting unfair because they dont like the fact that the person they voted for could get the most popular votes, but the number of electors there are for the person is not very many, so their votes count as less than others do. Many feel that they are being deprived of their right to vote because one person could be voting but they get 10 votes while another peson could be votin and only get 6 and its not equal for all people.
 People who vote for a president that gets the most popular votes, and they dont win the election, can start big disputes among the way the elections are carried out. When a president wins only the electoral votes and not the popular vote, many dont feel like they are actually their president. Most people would prefer direct voting because it actaully makes everybodys votes count equally and everybody has equality. Winning electoral votes doesnt show that you won because the majority of people wanted you to win, it shows you have many supporters to give you more votes through the electoral college Direct voting would be a better way to vote so that everybody felt like their votes really counted towards who they voted for and that they arent getting cheated because one president has more electors supporting them. The electoral college is not based on equality because everybodys votes count differently due to supporters or electors who are pretty much the ones getting the votes. fixing the way people vote and how they vote can change the way some people feel towards the preident no matter who they are. Let the people vote for who they want and not the electors because it would make more people more open to vote than there are now.

Output: Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the electoral college system in the United States and argue for or against its continued use.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The electoral college needs to be kept, it is the easiest way to vote for a presidential canidate People may not like it because the people who are voting for a president really are not voting for the  president, their voting for the electors to vote for the president. Which makes sense but the electoral college is simple and yet very reliable in many ways people dont see. The electoral college is based of popularity in a state. I  can see why people dont like that because certain states like florida has the maximum of 29 electoral votes, but wyoming only has a maximum of 3 electoral votes. The presidential canidates look for states that have the most electoral votes, but they also need more votes than the other canidate so every vote counts. Citizens may think that the canidates dont care about their state, but they do in more ways than you think The electoral college has a requirement, trans-regional appeal, which means that a canidate is popular in a certain region of the U.S for example, Mitt Romney he was the most popular in the south in 2012's election. Romney did not canpain heavily in the south so he did not gain any electoral votes by increasing his popularity in the states he knows he would win in. The electoral college is definatly something to argue about but in my opinion it should be kept. The Electoral college may seem a bit unfair but its also the most easiest desion making tool when it comes to electing. Its been around for years it would make no sense to get rid of it.

Output: Explain the advantages and disadvantages of the electoral college system in the United States and argue whether it should be kept or abolished.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Drivelss cars should not be developed because they can cause accidents they can cause the driver not to pay attetnion, and they would cost more. In paragraph 9, the text states "most driving laws focus on keeping dirvers, passengers, and pedestrians safe, and lawmakers know that safety is best achieved with alert drivers." The sentence proves that driveless cars may not be completely safe. The driver could depend on the car to drive itself and not be paying attention which can result in accidents. In paragraph 9, it also states that it is illegal to even test computer-driven cars. Something would not be illegal if it's comepletely safe. Driveless cars would be like phones. They made driving and texting illegal because it made the drivers not pay attention and caused many death and accidents. The same result can come form drivelss cars. They can be a great distraction becasue the driver would think that the car can drive itlsef and they would not pay attention. "If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault- the driver or the manufacturer" Who would be responsible? If the driver belived the car can drive itself and the techonology failed, it can lead to death because the driver might not be paying attention. The driver would think the car doesn't need a driver and when the techonology fails and the car spins out of control, many lives could be lost. The cost to buy would most likely be more expensive. If drivelessc cars started being in use, there would need to be new signs that fit those specific cars. Driveless cars would aslo need specific shops and equipment. If something goes wrong you would need to get it fixed and the technology used makes it more expensive. Fixing a car is already expensive. You have to buy whatever it is you need to fix and then take it to a shop. If something in the techonology of a driveless car goes wrong and you need to get it fixed, it will denifitely cost more. Causing accidents, causing the driver not to pay attention, and costing more are reasons why driveless cars should not be developed.

Output: Explain why driveless cars should not be developed, citing evidence from the text to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Today my firend Don Reist inviited me to come with him to the Seagoing Cowboys program he wanted me to go and tought about and Want to go mainly becaues I was 18 and out of school and i can get dafted to the army.
Don telled me that since the war was over we go to this other country and help them out a little sice it was a big mess over.
It was August 14, they reported us at New Orleans. When we got there they were giving out thing to do before the ship got there they said for me go get more peole to do this program and I did. I walked down to the bordwalk got a big line of people the fun thing was that if you get to convince eveyone who does not want to go then they just go some were real nice and just went but they were probalry going to be dafted like me.
August 15 the cattle boat was not there so, they said do the same thing again the same thing happend got a lot of people then they gave another job that it is to see wich man was strong enough to go they said i got to much people so, we get the strongest of the strongest two hour went bye and when eveyone was at lunch the boat was there .
August 16, I guess sleeping in a boat is the same thing as sleeping in a bed room but the bed was always moving but I can't lie about spleeping good last night. tonigth was a big night for me I was a wachtman . It was 11:00 ol'colck and it was raining and the waves sarted to pick up and then i slipped!
down a slide thank god i'm ok but I had to be in bed for a little with a cracked rib.
I was being dafted but they told me to keep doing my servive so, I did and I had the best three years ever I helped over 1 millon people and I visted nine countrys the good thing is that I'm ok

Output: Write an essay about your experience participating in the Seagoing Cowboys program, including how you were invited to join, your preparations before the ship arrived, your journey to the other country, and your duties while on the cattle boat. Additionally, discuss any challenges or obstacles you faced during the program and how you overcame them. Finally, reflect on the impact the program had on you and the people you helped, and how it shaped your future.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Fighting, drama, bullies, and irritated teachers are all factors of attending public school. We live in a society where social anxiety and depression are now a common problem. Everyday, somewhere in the world, a child is diagnosed with anxiety. Attending a public school can worsen the symptoms of the mental illness. Anxiety can have major effects on your body including; panic attacks, depressive spells, anger outburst, crying episodes, and nausea. Drama and fighting can be an easy trigger for a student with the mental illness, and for an unknown reason, public schools have a lot of drama. Most drama comes from bullying, the popular girls give the smart girls a hard time. The typical teenage "movie". Bullying is a serious matter, we lose at least 10 children a day due to bullying. When someone is mean to you over and over again, you begin to believe that it is your fault, which can cause negative thoughts in a young persons mind. The suicide rate in the past 20 years is higher than ever. Most of the recorded suicides have to deal with bullying Doing classes from home sounds like a positive way to keep physical bullying at a minimum. I understand waking up early, not getting enough sleep, didnt get a chance to have your morning coffee, or even you're still a little bit sleepy can have a negative effect on ones attitude. I believe teachers suffer with this reality more than the students. Their day can begin as early as 5 am!
School usually starts around 7am-8am, and when students arrive, some carry mean and ugly attitudes with them. The often take out stress or anger from other things on teachers who are already not having the best of days. In return, if being sent to the office isn't occurring, teachers will scream and fuss at the class causing a chain reaction of bad energy. Doing online classes doesn't sound half as bad when you hear you get to go to school in your pj's. I remember having "spirit week" at school, and we would have special day where we did different things. My favorite day was always "Pajama Day". Remaining comfy and calm can relieve stress from a student, which is why school from home sounds like a pretty good idea. In school, there are more than just you in the building, which means moving at your own pace isn't really an option. Students get extremely irritated when they feel like they are being rushed in or out of a subject, which can cause a lot of hostility or sadness I believe this can take a lot of the stress school applies away. I do understand that with doing school from the comfort of your own home comes with some cons as well, such as shielding children from a reality they soon will face. I am also aware that not all children have such access to these things such as; WiFi, a laptop, school supplies at home, or a good support system at home. I do believe that the "one-on-one" time a child will receive is extremely beneficial. The student will not have to worry about being left behind or being confused. They will have the time to understand while working at their own pace. Allowing the student to have a peace of mind, not worrying or struggling in school. In conclusion, the whole idea of school from home has both positive and negative outcomes. I believe it will help decrease the anxiety rate, and suicide rates of younger adults. I also believe it will help the graduation rate rise higher than ever. Students and teachers will have more time with family, friends, and themselves. Following the decision of home school, the time it takes the average student to complete school could be changed. Instead of the 12 year average it could be shortened due to the pace students work at with one on one education. The system definitely will have a better success rate with the homeschooling idea at hand.

Output: Discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of homeschooling as an alternative to attending public school, particularly in regards to the impact on mental health and academic success.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
In this article, "Unmasking the Face on Mars". Many people believe that this imprint of a human beings' face was sculpted by aliens In this essay, I will provide many reasons why this imprint was just a natural landform that looked identical to a human face. Scientist have discovered that this "Face" on Mars was just a natural landform. Many people are trying to say that the face was created by aliens There are many ways that we could prove that aliens DID NOT create this fasinating landform From far away, this imprint looks exactly like a human face. If you focuse hard enough on this sculpture, you could indentify its eyes, mouth, nose and head shape.
 One of the many reasons that this artifact was not created by aliens is because, provided in the article, back on April 5th, 1998, Mars Global Surveyor flew over Cydonia for the first time. Scientist studied the artifact from afar, yet, they were still able to see the face. One of the scientist, Michael Malin, and his Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) team took pictures of this marvelous sculpture As Michael looked closer into each picture, he discovered that the creation was not carved that way in any sort. He discovered that the artifact was just a landform that began to age that way. Another way to prove this artifact was not created by aliens is, there was no one there at the planet Mars Scientist looked all over the planet, circled it for a long period of time. There was no foot prints, or any marks on this planet. Many believed that no matter how hard they searched, the solution would come out possitive. No one came and created this impressive land. In the passage it says on April 8, 2001--a cloudless summer day in Cydonia, Mars Global Surveyor drew close enough for a second look. They had to roll the spacecraft 25 degrees to center the Face in the field of view. Each pixel spanned about 1.56 meters in 2001. The best Viking photo in 1976 was measured out to be 43 meters per pixel. This is when they knew for a fact that this landform was not something anyone else was able to make. This was all just a huge coincedense that there was a face imprinited on our called, "Red Planet". This is why we should believe that "the Face" was just a natural landform. All facts has proven, that this creation was just part of Mars. There was no clear explaination that an alien would come and create this. If aliens tend to exist, there's no possible way they would know the facial structures of a human face.

Output: Explain why the "Face" on Mars is believed to be a natural landform and not created by aliens, using evidence from the article "Unmasking the Face on Mars".


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
When making decisions people often look to others for advice. Whether the decision be where to go for lunch or something that would alter your life people seek others opinion. Often times going to more than one person to get advice can be a very beneficial thing to do. Getting more than one opinion can be very helpful since it gives you more outlook on the question at hand By asking more than one person you get multiple sides of your situation their past experience in doing something similar in the end you will be more confident in your final choice. Going to other for advice can really open your eyes to all sides of your dilemma. Perhaps you want to apply to a school and are having a hard time deciding whether to apply or not. Asking someone who may have gone to that school or had experience with something like that would be helpful because they know what its like. Then for another opinion talk to someone close to you like a friend or a family member to see if they think it would be a good fit for you specifically. These people also may see things that you dont in a situation. Seeing multiple sides of the decision in question really helps to make a clear decision. Some of the people you would want to talk to probably have more experience than you do. This would be optimal considering they have already gone through something very similar and know which choices have a bad outcome. A family member, close friend, or anyone you trust really would be a good option for this. If they are older than you its likely they had to make some similar decision and will relate to you and your situation and try their best to help aid you in making a good choice. These people that have more experience in life and are willing to help you really make the difference and help you make the best choice possible. After asking all these people and taking into consideration all of their opinions there should be a pretty clear final decision. Since you've asked all of these people you should be able to confidently make a good choice that will benefit you. Going into something like a job or a try out is optimal for success. All in all more opinions makes a stronger and more sound conclusion to the problem at hand.
An example of this from my past experience would be when I tried out for junior varsity softball at Generic_School. I wasnt sure if trying out was gonna benefit me at all considering i'm in 8th grade and many of the girls out there have many more years of experience. I went to my dad for advice since he played junior varsity and has also seen me play. In his opinion he didnt think I should try out because its a lot to take on during 8th grade. Then I went to some of my friends for their opinion on it and they gave me the confidence to go and try out. Right now Im on the softball team and very happy with the choice I made to try out. asking more than one person for their opinion on a problem is very beneficial. By asking more people you can see all different sides of the question. These people have different experiences which could cause them to see things that you cant. Having all of these different sides should make it so your final decision is something you can be happy and confident with.

Output: Explain the benefits of seeking advice from multiple sources when making a decision. Use personal experience or examples to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I can see why you can think that "the Face on Mars" is some form of proof that either alien life did at one time or is still cuurrently on Mars . The human mind is meant to think, imagine and wonder "what if". Let's say these "aliens" are in fact real and constructed "the Face" in order to communicate with us. Carving a giant face has got to be one of if not thee least effective way of dong so.
These "aliens" very well could have simply just put a peice of shiney metal on the surface and the MGS would have seen it and we would probaly think "hey, this unknown element is here on the surface of a planet where there are no metals". Not only would it make us think that there is indeed metals on Mars but then we would think "hey metals most usually form deep undergroud so there is no reason for this to be on the surface". THAT would be a valid way of letting us know "hey, we exist".
 Also another thing, if "aliens" made "the Face" how is it no footprint s were found. And there's no wind on Mars they coulnt have blown away. Seriusly, that's a big project so you're gonna need a lot of your alien buddies to help you out with it and no footprints....hmm. Well hey,maybe they have got giant eagle wings and fly everywhere. Yeah, on a planet that HAS NO GRAVITY! Let's face it though (ha, face, get it?) everybody loves a good "supernatural " story. I believe that this is nothing more. "Once in 1976 a NASA spacecraft was looking for a place to land, and there on the surface they found... a huge human's face carved out of the surface Mount Rushmore style....wooouuh"
 The very thought that "aliens" somehow carved a face onto Mars is ridiculis

Output: Write an essay discussing the validity of the claim that "the Face on Mars" is proof of alien life on the planet. Consider the effectiveness of carving a giant face as a means of communication, the possibility of alternative methods of communication, the lack of footprints or other evidence of construction, and the human tendency to believe in supernatural stories.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Scientists have been studying Venus for generations, wondering what could possibly be on a planet so close to ours. Now that we don't have to wonder anymore, NASA will try to take it one step higher. They want to be as close to Venus' ground as possible, without dying.
 Their plans are to use a blimp-like vehicle that will withstand the great amount of pressure and heat. It will fly thirty miles above the Venusian landscape, avoiding any ground conditions that would do them harm. It would still be 170 degrees F., but they would have an abundance of solar energy, and the radiation woud not exceed Earth levels. However, in order to learn all there is about Venus, you would have to go onto Venus. This is almost an impossible task though. There are many dangers on Venus, including sulfuric acid rain and an atmosphere of nintey seven percent carbon dioxide. Hovering over it would be useless. In paragraph six, it states, "... peering at Venus from a ship orbiting or hovering safely far above the planet can provide only limited insight on ground conditions because most forms of light cannot penetrate the dense atmosphere, rendering standard forms of photography and videography ineffective." This states that by hovering on top of the planet, they can't learn anyting they don't already know. My honest oppinion on this topic is that we should not be exploring Venus right now. We just don't have the right technology for it right now. We need to wait however many years before we can officially explore our sister planet. Trying to figure out its secrets now would just be a waste of time, money, and possibly lives. We shouldn't risk a human being just because this planet used to be like ours millions of years ago.

Output: Discuss the challenges and potential risks associated with NASA's plan to explore Venus using a blimp-like vehicle, and argue whether or not it is worth the investment of time, money, and human lives.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: This policy is unreasonable it is because some kids that love sports only have a c average and are trying their hardest Also when you take away sports and other activities from students, you are taking away their exercise. When you take away a students exercise you could make them have a risk of death. Also some kids might have a disorder that will keep them away from doing their work, and can only get a c average. And those kids with disorders might love sports or other activities, and you are keeping them away from that. Wouldn't you feel bad knowing you would be taking away something that other people love to do. Also what could happen is that the people that can only get a c average could get mad or jealous at the people with a b average or better. So that would cause a lot of problems in school. There could be more fights then usual. Or people could just stop caring about their grades if they cant get better then a c average trying their hardest. This problem could get you fired because it wouldn't be a good school. So say some kids at your school are having a rough time at home and the only thing that makes them happy is sports. But they only have a c average because of their home life. They wont be happy ever again if they cant do what they love. What happens when a kid that has a b average, gets one bad grade and goes down to a c average in the middle of the season and is the best player? All I'm saying is that it wouldn't be fair to the students if you were to follow through with this policy. Too many kids love sports and have a c average.

Output: Explain why a policy that takes away sports and other activities from students with a c average is unreasonable and potentially harmful to students. Consider the impact on exercise, students with disorders, potential for increased conflict, and the emotional well-being of students who rely on sports as a source of happiness. Use specific examples to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Have you ever wanted to be a farmer or see European country's but just never had the money? Well now you can. All you have to do is become a seagoing cowboy. Being a seagoing cowboy can be fun but alot of work too. You have to go tend gargo with sometime's well over 335 animal. You don't just look at them though. You have to clean their stalles and feed and water them two or three times a day. The food is not just sitting outany where. you have to pull alot of hay bails and bags of oats from the lower holds of the ship.
 Now we have talked enough about the cattle farming. Now lets talk about the sight seeing part. You don't just work on ships. Once you get to Europe you unload the cattle and you can sight seeing. You go pretty much any where. You could go to great wall of China or take a gondola or canal ride in Venice italy. When your on your way back you get to play games in the stalls where the animal once were. You can play games like baseball and volleyball. You also get to play games like table tennis,fencing and boxing. You could also read and whittle to help pass time. Now that you all know what a seagoing cowboy is I strongly encourge you to join and be a part of the fun.

Output: Describe the responsibilities and experiences of a seagoing cowboy, including caring for livestock and sightseeing in Europe, and explain why someone might be interested in pursuing this unique opportunity.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Luke joined the seagoing cowboys because he wanted to be helpful. but here is the thing no one else from his town joined probibley because they were to scared to even think about even doing the job i cant believ he was the only one to join that is just not right. so some one else needs to join. but no one will join at all so he is the only one to do the job and if i were him i would be so mad i would just quite. people should join they would go tho diffrent places and meet diffrent people and try diffrent food in the story it says that Luke went to CHINA and gave tem mules horses and cows because some people eat cow the also ride the horse and mule but they also use them to transeport goods and to till the filde.

Output: Discuss the reasons why Luke joined the seagoing cowboys and the challenges he faced as the only person from his town to do so. Evaluate the benefits of joining the seagoing cowboys, including the opportunity to travel to different places, meet new people, and experience different cultures. Analyze the impact of Luke's work as a seagoing cowboy, including his trip to China and the delivery of mules, horses, and cows to the local population. Finally, discuss the importance of


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Summer projects are often seen by the student populous as a scourge upon their lives, more work to procrastinate on. To teachers, however, they are a tool which students can use in order to stay on track with their education and keep up-to-date information with. As painful as they seem, these projects are created with a significant goal in mind: teaching accurately and consistently. Although student-designed summer projects are often more in-touch with other students, teacher-designed summer projects are tailored to the expectations of discipline and knowledge held for their students.
 teacher-designed summer curricula enable the student to learn and apply their knowledge suited to the general teaching style. Over the summer, it's difficult for many students to stay on track with their learning, and it's very easy for them to drift away from their usual learning. Staying on-track is essential for students with good expectations and high goals; these projects can be designed to accomplish this, without any rough beginnings once the semester starts. In calculus, my teacher has very high expectations for his students. Every one of us received a "summertime fun packet" to work through over the summer, and it prepped us for the year that was to come: the first day of school, he jumped right into action and lectured to us as if it were the day before the AP exam. Because of his summer assignment's intuitive design, most students were prepared for this behavior, and could take thorough notes on the subject, further proving that teacher-designed projects are more useful to the hardworking student. they are tailored to the unique curriculum the student will be taught with. Any good teacher can deviate from the standard curriculum throughout their teaching, and an assignment on par with the syllabus prepares the student for this "improvisation." For instance, my literature teacher assigned us questions analyzing a book we had read in the year, preparing our brains for the material we would be seeing in the year. Although the curriculum calls for practice in rhetorical analysis, it does not discuss proper thesis writing: our instructor assigned us work for both of these. Every dedicated student in the class was not only prepared for the work we were given, but we were confident in our abilities to accomplish these assignments. On account of the deep analysis questions my teacher assigned to me over the summer, I was more able to excel in my work in language and literature, further driving me to learn more and become more accomplished in my English classes. better for the student because a teacher has considerably more years of experience both learning and teaching effectively. Generic_Name taught us to hold mutual respect between student and teacher; in the best of classes, this respect is still exercised and encouraged to make learning as enriching and impactful as possible. With this in mind, the teacher is also more likely to be accurately designing their projects to reasonable expectations for the student, and to make summer assignments as practical as possible. Teachers are constantly informed on new teaching strategies and the most effective ways for students to apply themselves, and it's their job to make use of this in order to prepare their students for their futures. Alongside personal experience and intuitive training, the teacher is in a much less biased position to be creating work, without personal incentives to lighten the workload or to cut corners in their answers. All things considered, the experience a teacher has in preparing students for class is the most valuable quality they hold when it comes to your workload, far outweighing the experience of a busy student. a teacher is undoubtedly the best person to be designing summer projects. The teacher's abilities to tailor their assignments consistent with their teaching style, to prepare the student according to the curriculum they are taught with, and to teach according to their own class experiences enable the most practical and effective work a student can receive. It's very important that summer assignments reflect what a teacher produces in their class. Without this preparation, valuable classtime that could be used to frontload the curriculum is lost, and a student will not get enough out of their education as they require to achieve their highest goals.

Output: Explain the benefits of teacher-designed summer projects compared to student-designed summer projects, and how they can help students stay on track with their education and prepare them for the upcoming school year. Use specific examples from your own experience to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I am personally against the policy that states that a student has to maintain a B or better average to play a sport or participate in activities. To sustain a C average without playing sports is one thing. But if someone sustains a C average while playing one or more sports is actually quite an undertaking. See I play sports and I have an A average but believe me its not even relatively close to being easy. I believe that other rules having to do with the sports themselves should be altered before there is a change in the grade requirements. If you are going to change something about the sports program change how long the practice can be or the amount of practices allowed per week. That in itself will give the student athletes more breathing room so they will have an easier time bringer their grades up. If these work than you can keep the required average at a C, but if these fail, that is when you would be obliged to make the required average a B so the students have more drive to keep their grades up. But at the time I think you should change the limitations of the sports programs in itself before any of the grade requirements are changed.

Output: Discuss the policy that requires student athletes to maintain a B or better average to participate in sports or activities. Argue for or against this policy and propose alternative solutions to help student athletes balance their academic and athletic responsibilities.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I agree with the principal some school work may include working together as a team if they do an activity like sports,they can learn now things like find different ways to score or if they are losing they find ways to comeback. i think its a good idea for students to participate in a extracurricular activity because they can spend time with friends you can join a club that can help you with your homework if you want to play a sport,you can sigh up for a activity that doesnt need to tryout for that sport if you want to get some college credits then you can sigh up for an activity that can help you get some college credit a good way to get some there is multiple ways to get some college credits like a good one is learning a language that is a good way to some college credit. you have nothing to do after school you can join an activity that can keep you busy. And this is why i agree with the principal because it can help us in the further on in life.

Output: Discuss the benefits of participating in extracurricular activities, including sports, clubs, and activities that can help students earn college credits. In your essay, explain how these activities can help students develop teamwork skills, spend time with friends, and stay busy after school. Additionally, discuss how participating in extracurricular activities can benefit students in the future.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I'm against driverless cars and trucks. I'm against driverless cars on the road because everyone woud have to buy the car at the same time or this wouldn't work. This wouldn't work because the first half of people who get the driverless car will be safer. But then the half that doesn't have the smart car will run to the smart car and we are still back to square one. As it says in the story "sensors are nothing new." Sensors are always going to fail there is no way to stop technolgy from failing on point in time. Everything is too new. When one of the parts need replaced on these smart cars its going to cost a fourtne to fix. You already see how with all the technolgy in our cars now its getting to expensive to fix. The problem is the flaw is that they are going to have to keep updating cars and maps in the cars so the car to know the fastest way to the destination. Also if there is unexpected road work it will be try to go right threw the road work and i dont see that working. The next problem i invision is that all the laws will have to be changed to meet the critera of the car. This will in a way force the people who dont want to buy a smart car to have to buy one. As stated in paragraph 9 the car are not reliable enough for the laws to get changed. This is not a safe idea at all because there will always be that one parent that who will program there car to do something for the child and they will expect the car to get to that destination safely. But the risk of a malfunction is very great. The parent doesn't see the risk until it is too late and the child is either hit by another motorist or the car malfunctions and the kid runs into something and the car has gotten wrecked. I also don't feel like it should be the manufacturers fault for the stupidity of the parent.
 if a person wants to stop at some where or at a gas station for a snack or for a restroom break they can't. They can't because the car was only programed to go to that certain place. So in other words you would have to go to the destination then turn right around and go to the gas station or store. As of right now i still think that humans are way more reliable than technolgy. I feel like there will always be accidents. There is no way of stopping people from running in to each other at least once in the cars lifetime. You need alot more research fome me to go along with the idea of having smarter cars. So that is why I think that car should not be smarter yet.

Output: Explain the potential flaws and risks associated with the implementation of driverless cars and trucks on the road, as outlined in the essay statement provided. Consider factors such as the need for universal adoption, the reliability of technology, the cost of maintenance and updates, the need for changes in laws and regulations, and the potential for human error in programming and decision-making. Evaluate the argument that humans are currently more reliable than technology and provide evidence to support or refute this claim.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Last week, I had a math test on my first period. I prepared well for the test, but on that day, I woke up late, and I realized I got late for my school. I also have missed my school bus; therefore, I had to walk the whole way to my school. I was tired and tensed. As a result, I couldn't do well in that test, but if I was taking online class, I could take the test from home and be able to not get into all this trouble Online classes can save us from getting into all this kind of problems and save our time also. Although some say students would not benefit from being able to attend classes from home because sometimes, students might not understand their lecture or work on online classes, and as a result, they would not be able to do well in that class, actually students would benefit from being able to attend online classes from home because sometimes, students don't want to go to school because of sickness or being not at home, so they can stay home and take classes from wherever they are at that time and by taking online classes high school students can save a lot of time and can work for more hours or do some other courses or activities.
 They say sometimes students might not understand their lecture or work on online classes, and as a result, they would not be able to do well in that class. For example, if they get a project or assignment, some students may have trouble in understanding how to do/complete that assignment or sometimes, they might not understand a topic from a lecture in online class. However, students would benefit from being able to attend online classes from home because sometimes, students don't want to go to school because of sickness or being not at home, so they can stay home and take classes from wherever they are at that time. For example, if I get sick, I don't need to miss school. I can stay at home and take my classes from home. Again, if I'm not at home or may be I'm at my relative's place or my friend's place, I'll be still able to attend those classes. Also, students would benefit from being able to attend online classes from home because by taking online classes, high school students can save a lot of time and can work for more hours or do some other courses or activities. One example is that, if I don't need to come to school to attend classes I would be able to make my own schedule and I can do my job for more hours in weekdays and save money for my college. Again, I can finish my school works quickly and take other courses which can help me in my future career or, may be I can do some other activities I like. In conclusion, students would benefit from being able to attend online classes from home because sometimes, students don't want to go to school because of sickness or being not at home, so they can stay home and take classes from wherever they are at that time and by taking online classes, high school students can save a lot of time and can work for more hours or do some other courses or activities. Online classes can help us in many ways. Not only it will save our time but also it can give us opportunity to do a lot of extra activities and enjoy the day.

Output: Discuss the benefits of attending online classes from home for high school students, including the ability to attend classes from anywhere, save time, and pursue other activities or courses. Consider potential drawbacks, such as difficulty understanding lectures or assignments, and provide examples to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Many students would benefit from attending classes at home. School is a very chaotic place and students suffer from many things on a day to day basis from bullying, interruptions from staff, teachers, and even other students The students would love the idea since they can learn at their own pace be able to focus and get their work done A lot of things can happen to the student if they were to stay in school.
Majority of students that attend any type of school suffer from anxiety, pressure, and many other things. Having them in a quiet area would help them out a lot so they can refrain from any distractions or anything else that can interrupt their school work and make them feel overwhelmed. With the student staying home they will have a better surrounding and environment at home rather than being at school with all of the chaotic things that happen there. One on one time would also benefit the student with a massive impact. Students often get irritated with the fact that teachers would have a line of students asking for questions but their question is far more important. With the student being at home they could get that question answered right then and there without them having to wait minutes for their question be answered. Even questions that are outside of school and the question is urgent, it could help the student out a lot since they may not feel comfortable talking to their parent about it. Parents believe that a student would rather benefit from going to school and doing the work rather than staying at home and doing their classes there. However, there are many possibilities and dangers outside of home that can ruin the students experience going to school and doing their classes there Students staying at home would not only benefit the student but also the parents since the outside world especially school can be a scary place. Having classes at home is a very big step for the schools but it can be done and it would make a huge impact to the students and the parents.
If a student did not feel comfortable with the school environment having them be at home in their space, and area it could show a lot of postive results to other parents and students. Students wouldn't have to feel groggy in the morning or be late to any class since they could just be at home and take everything at their own pace with a specific time end date of course. Having classes at home instead of going to school would be a big difference in the world today.

Output: Discuss the potential benefits of attending classes at home for students, including the ability to learn at their own pace, avoid distractions and interruptions, and have one-on-one time with teachers. Consider the potential impact on student anxiety and pressure, as well as the potential benefits for parents concerned about their child's safety and well-being in a school environment. Evaluate the feasibility of implementing home-based learning programs and the potential challenges that may arise.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I believe that driverless cars would be a help to society and the economy I believe so because with driverless cars, everyone will have the same driving skill as everyone else and we won't have people on the road who are either horrible or a professional at driving. Everyone will drive in the same way which will make it easier to avoid other cars and crate less car accidents and collisions. They also use less gas which will stop people from paying for gas so often and will be able to ride their driverless cars much longer without spending as much money on gas. With driverless cars and their sensors, they could possibly be more aware about their surroundings than the average person. When people are driving they have blind spots where they can't see who is around them, with the sensors all around the cars, it will be hard to miss any object coming toward or is near the car from any direction or area. With the car being able to see objects, people who are carless or uncarful or are little kids and don't check to see if cars are coming while crossing the road or getting something in the road, could get hurt if not noticed. All people in a car should be aware about their surroundings when driving, but not all people are. Some girls could be doing their make up or texting. Guys could be texting or just being to careless. They are the ones who would hit an oncoming person or kid in the road and possibly killing someone who is married, young and loved by many people. This would cause them to be arrested and have the guilt of killing someone or potentially killing someone. With the driverless car, if someone wasn't paying attention, the car would make up for it by always being attentive and aware. The cars would either stop or move out of the way to make sure nothing happend to the innocent passerby. Being in a car that does all the work could get a little boring though i'll admit. But, being bored and keeping people safe rather than having fun at the wheel and puting other people in danger is the better way to go. this could also stop people who get disoriented at the wheel as well. Some people either are very sleepy before already driving, get bored while driving and become sleepy, people who are blind and still need a ride, or are even drunk when about to drive. The driveless car can help with these problems as well. It will stop peolpe from going in ditches or hitting other objects. some people are nervous about driving and this could help them alot by not making them drive but still have the ability to go places on their own With all these helpful actions these cars will do for people, I don't see why it could possibly be a bad idea.

Output: Explain the potential benefits of driverless cars for society and the economy, including their ability to improve driving safety, reduce gas consumption, and increase awareness of surroundings. Discuss how driverless cars could help prevent accidents caused by human error and improve accessibility for individuals who are blind, nervous about driving, or under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Consider the potential drawbacks of driverless cars, such as the potential for boredom and the need for new regulations and infrastructure. Finally, argue whether or not you believe


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
In the 1960's driverless cars seemed more as like a futuristic fantasy rather than reality, but in todays world, they just might be the next big thing. In the late 1950's, General Motors created a concept car that could run on a special test track (Ph. 3). Although this was the first concept of a "smart car", the roads would need an unrealistic upgrade that would cost extremely to much. Today however, we have the technology to make real driverless cars. The toll of human error has been evident in the auto-age as more accidents happen every year. The use of driverless cars, or at least almost driverless cars, will be benificial to the future as less accidents will happen, preventing more casualties.
 Today, many cars all across America and the world have road assistance and antilock breaks, but this still gives drivers the oppurtunity to make a mistake and cause an accident. For example, BMW created a system called " Traffic Jam Assistant". The car is capable of handling situations at speeds up to 25 mph. This is not bulletproof though, as the human driver still has to be alert when navigating through construction and accidents. Developers though, are getting closer to having real driverless cars. Tesla has projected a 2016 release for a car capable of driving on autopilot 90% of the time (Ph.10). Technology today makes creations and inventions capable of almost anything. We have had extreneous experience with sensors and radar, two things that are almost required for a driverless car in the upcoming future, to make one. In the 1980's, more than 30 years ago, automakers used speed sensors at the wheels in the creation of antilock brakes (Ph. 5). With all of the experience gained, we now can make real driverless cars. Infact, we all ready have. Google has had cars that could drive independently under specific conditions since 2009 (Ph. 2). Their cars have driven more than half a million miles without a crash, but roadblocks and problems do lie ahead for a true "driverless car". Traffic laws are written with the asssumption that the only safe car has a human driver in contral at all times (Ph. 9). As a result, many states restrict the use of driverless cars on the roads. As driverless cars are a relatively new idea, restrictions will be diminished in due time. Opposers of driverless cars have also made the claim that liability will possibly be the dimise of driverless cars. The discussion of whether or not the human in the seat or the car manufacturer will no doubt be on the minds of lawmakers, but they would quicky come to the conclusion that it would be the driver's fault, since the driver bought the car and knew what he/she was getting into. Manufacturers would also make a liability agreement required in order to driver the car. Although driverless cars will not probably be 100% driverless, the creation of almost driverless cars is not far down in world history. The use of driverless cars, or at least almost driverless, will be beneficial to the future as less accidents will happen, preventing more casualties.

Output: Explain the history and development of driverless cars, including the first concept car created by General Motors in the late 1950s and the current technology used by companies such as Tesla and Google. Discuss the potential benefits of driverless cars, such as reducing the number of accidents caused by human error, and the challenges that must be overcome, such as changes to traffic laws and liability issues.