Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
The Electoral College is a system of electing our president created by our founding fathers when they were writing the Constitution.  Lately though, people have opposed the Electoral College due to the election when Al Gore beat George Bush in the popular vote, but lost the electoral vote(and a seat as President I do not support the Electoral College the lack of a direct link from the public to the election of the president the unfairness of it towards voters.
 I do not support the Electoral College because of a lack of a direct link from the public to the election of the president. Instead of the public voting for the president, they are voting for a group of electors who, in turn, elect the president.  The problem with that is that the group of electors can be anyone not holding the public office.  But just in case of dishonest electors, states hold state conventions to pick the electors.  But even after this, voters still can not control who their state's electors vote for.  Sometimes, electors get confused about who someone voted for and put them down for a candidate different from whom they originally voted for.  Now we could avoid all this trouble if we just did away with Electoral College and had a direct vote for president, and have the election "by the people and for the people" instead of "by the people and for the electors. I do not support the Electoral College because of the unfairness of it towards the voters Due to the winner take all system in each state, candidates for president don't focus on winning every state.  Instead, they focus on only winning the "swing" states, or, states whose political party support is constantly changing.  In the presidential election of 2000, the presidential candidates didn't see 17 states(including, but not limited to, Rhode Island and South Carolina) and 25 of the largest media markets' voters didn't see a single presidential campaign ad.  This is another good reason to get rid of the Electoral College Based on this evidence, I believe the Elelectoral College should be done away with because of a lack of a direct link to the election of the president and the unfairness of it towards voters.

Output: Explain the reasons why the Electoral College system is being opposed by some people and argue for or against its continuation in the United States presidential elections.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: This goes out to the senator of florida. I think we need to chang to voteing way. We need to change it from the Electoral college to the most popular vote for the president of th Unitd States of America. Because whats the point of all of our parents and alot of other adults of voting if we can't even get what we want but no it's all up to the electors and congress, ect. like for real what is the point in voting if it isn't a fair shot. Now that I've read it we don't even vote for the prsident we vote for the slate of electorswho in turn elect the president. Whom are the electors? They can be anyone not holding public office. Who picks the electors in the first place? It depnds on the state sometimes state conventions sometimes the stateparty's centeral committee sometimes the presidential candidates themselves. Can voters control whom their electors vote for ? Not always. Do voters sometimes get confused about the electors and vote for the wrong canidate? Sometimes. At the most basic level the electoral college is unfair to voters. And dont likethat because the what the heck is happening if were not acktually voting for the president and just the electors. Like for real then whats the point of voting if were not getting what we want. When the goverment is all about giveing the people what they want.

Output: Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the Electoral College system in the United States and argue for or against its continuation. Consider the impact on voter representation, the role of electors, and the potential for confusion or error in the voting process. Use evidence and examples to support your argument and propose potential alternatives to the current system.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
This policy change will be a bad idea because a c average is good. B average is better but many school will not have a lot of kids playing sport.
 a c average is not the best but it will get you in to high school. a lot of kids my even move from to school and go to a school that c averages can play sports. its not going to be fair to a lot of kids not saying it will be better in a way it may be a good idea if the school is doing bad like kid are getting d and F 's. it may improve kids in there work so they will get a and B 's it will be for the best. i been to a school that the kids talk back to the teacher and the throw stuff at the teacher and the school say if you have a c average you are off sports. the kids got way better a lot of the bad kids transferred to a new school and the good kids stayed so they swiched back to c average. i when to a good school last time it was the best you can get in with a d average. than the school got bad cause the kid from a different school came and they did so bad that they swiched it to a A average to play sport. the kids did not care so they just got rid of to sports i think a c average is the best for the school so everything can be equal. a,b,c,d,f. c is in the middle a B has 3 in back and one in front it will be the biggest mistake to do this. that is my reson

Output: Evaluate the potential impact of a policy change that requires student athletes to maintain a B average in order to participate in sports, considering factors such as fairness, academic performance, and student retention. Use personal experiences and research to support your argument for or against the policy change.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
The popularity of mobile devices has had some unintended and sometimes deadly consequences. An alarming number of traffic accidents are linked to driving while distracted, including use of mobile devices while driving, resulting in injury and loss of life. The most recent national statistics are sobering. 3,166 people were killed by distracted driving in 2017 alone, 8.5 percent of total fatalities for the year.
Approximately nine people are killed and more than 1,000 injured daily in the United States in incidents reported as involving a distracted driver. During daylight hours across America, approximately 481,000 drivers are using cell phones while driving. Teens were the largest age group reported as distracted at the time of fatal crashes . Texting while driving and other cell phone use while driving facts and statistics show that this multitasking behind the wheel is becoming a life-threatening norm Talking or texting while driving or checking or sending social media posts takes eyes and brains off the task of driving. While texting while driving certainly doesn't always lead to a fatality, there are a wealth of statistics that show that texting and driving is directly connected to traffic deaths National Safety Council reports that cell phone use leads to 1.6 million crashes on a yearly basis while texting while driving is six times more likely to cause a crash than drunk driving is. One out of every four traffic crashes that occur in the U.S. are spurred by cell phone usage, and furthermore, each day, 11 teens die as a result of texting and driving, which is a downright astounding number. Over 3,000 teens and young drivers die yearly due to texting while driving. Almost every state has laws strictly prohibiting texting while driving, and those who don't often consider it a distracted driving offense. States that once allowed texting while driving have since cracked down on distracted driving. Many states also prohibit talking on the phone while driving unless you are using a hands-free device. If you are a commercial driver, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) prohibits all commercial drivers from using hand-held mobile devices.
 Distracted driving consists of driving while distracted in any manner. While cell phone use is often a part of it, distracted driving also encompasses many other activities, including eating, reading, drinking, talking to other passengers, looking around, adjusting location devices, adjusting the radio or any other activity that takes the driver's attention away from the task of driving. While any of these activities may be involved, texting while driving is usually considered the most serious type of distracted driving because it causes the most types of distraction.

Output: Explain the unintended consequences of the popularity of mobile devices, specifically in relation to distracted driving. Use statistics and examples to support your argument and discuss the severity of the issue. Additionally, explore the various forms of distracted driving and the laws and regulations in place to prevent it.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Over the past 4 decades cell phones have evolved extremely.
Nowadays people use their phones for just about any and everything. Things such as texting, calling, playing games, booking appointments, even checking latest posts on social media and much more. Cell phones started to become a problem when people were just looking down at their phones while crossing the street. Something that could be fixed. Now, people are choosing to use their phones while driving which has become an issue and is very dangerous. Which puts not only the driver in danger put others as well.
 Each day people are dying or being injured from using their cellular devices while being behind the wheel. Each year 421,000 people in the United States are injured due to a driver being distracted by their device. It's more common for teens and young adults to text and drive (ages 18-24). 14% of fatal crashes are involved from texting and driving in this age division. In 2017 the "Hands Free Law" had been issued. Which means drivers are allowed to use hand free devices only while being behind the wheel of a car and being completely free of a device. Although people may think the hands free law has prevented less accident it hasn't it only makes people have the urge to reach for their devices even more. 11 teenagers die every day due to texting and driving. Teenagers are 400% more likely to get into an accident from texting and driving. AT&T's Teen Driver Survey found that 97% of teenagers think it's dangerous, while 43% of them engage in the activity anyway.
 In conclusion I strongly disagree with texting and driving because it puts more than one person in danger. I feel as if you need to use your device while behind the wheel of a moving vehicle be mindful and pull to the side. Weather it's for making a quick call or sending a quick message even typing in a location into the GPS pull over because anything could happen in the blink of an eye.

Output: Discuss the dangers of using cellular devices while driving and the impact it has on individuals and society. Include statistics and examples to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: yes there should because our school is not clean and a lot of students leave there trash and they blame other people. For some other people trash . That's not right that they do that so defenetly . We shold have community service for those student that don't clean up there own mess. I think that is a great idea cause when u put that rule they would start to listen to the school rules. Then they would all see how we need to listen to the school that when they say to clean up is time to clean every body should listen to every thing the principal wants every body to listen to him to what he says to students and also listen to your teachers because that is not fare you don't do the right things. I think the students would listen to him he is a nice principal.

Output: Propose a solution to address the issue of littering and uncleanliness in the school premises, and explain how it can help instill discipline and responsibility among the students.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
People tend to ask more than one person at a time for advice because it can make them seem comfortable with their answer, but also there are so many different ways people do this and there can also be a lot of ways why people would do this One example that I can think about is when your trying to spelling a word in class. You might be thinking that you have spelled that one word wrong and want it to be confirmed that you're either right or wrong. The first thing you'll probably ask is your friend next to you, but you think that they spelled your word wrong too. You might ask another friend, yet that other friend still gets it wrong. After that I'm guessing your going to go ask your teacher that has more knowledge on spelling. You do this because you want to comfirm that you were right and didn't trust yourself There are so many different times where you need someone elses opinion on a daily bases someone might ask if they like him or hers outift today or ask if you liked what they cooked for dinner. They do this because they need clarrifiction with you or need someone elses opinion to make them feel comortable if they are questioning something about themselfs. Some people may act independent but I'm sertain that they have asked for an opinion even if it's just something small I mean that you probably ask for someones opionion at least five times a day or if not more, usally we don't even think before saying it. When we ask for an imput on what or how another person thinks I think is also a way to fit in. Just like following a trend we ask to stay updaited and so we make a normal decision. Even just the way everyone thinks and acts differently is actually a big reason to why we ask for another persons opinion. This is because if that one person has more knowledge on that one thing, there will be some people that will ask for there opinion on it so they can have some more understanding about whatever it is that that person knows.
For example if someone is trying to learn how to skateboard (meaning they just started and aren't comfortable riding yet) and are trying to learn a new trick, they will probably practice a lot but if they are at the skate park with a friend they're going to ask there friend for some pointers on learning that new trick. Yet if you went with two of your friends one being really good at skateboarding and knowing all the tricks and the other doesn't even own a skateboard. You would want to ask the one who knows how to skate but would probably end up asking both of your friends just for the sake of knowing more and go with the opinion with the friend you think helps the most. People giving out their opinion to someone who needs it is a person who is always willing to help. When asking someone for their opinion they might not always give it to you which might be another reasons to why you have to ask other people. The main reason they probably won't give their opinion to you is because they are also unsure and don't want to give out the wrong imformation. Somebody else that doesn't know a lot about what your asking might just guess because they don't really know too much on what your asking and at the end say "but I don't know for sure" which puts the person asking the question in an awkard situtaion and that's when they will ask somebody else. I think the most popular reason why people ask more than one person is that they are unsure with ones opinion and need to confirm with different people so they can make sure that they are final with their decision These people probably will do this when it's important like when your doing a school project. Yet they might do this because the first person they ask he or she might think they asked the wrong person because their answer was totally different from what they first got. I think that asking different people for their opinion is good so you can have more understanding and more clarrifiction to know what another persons imput is.

Output: Explain the reasons why people tend to ask for multiple opinions before making a decision, using examples from daily life situations such as spelling a word, choosing an outfit, or learning a new skill. Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of seeking multiple opinions and analyze the impact of individual differences in decision-making processes.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
As you know every four years a president is elected. In order for that to happen the candidates go through the process of an Electoral College or the people vote. An Electoral College is when the congress gets to vote to pick who the president and vice president will be. And the other way is when the people of that state get to vote. some disavantages of doing an Electoral College is if the president is bad the congress will get blammed. Vandalism, riots, breaking laws. Who knows how far people will go to get their way. And there are many more mistakes that happen. As said in the article the voters sometimes get confused about the electors and vote for the wrong candidate. Now there are some disavantages for the people voting but not as many and not as bad. Yes people can still get angery and do bad things, but due to the privacy when we vote there is no one to speicficly blame. There are way more of us then the congress, so mistakes won't always affect things as bad. even though there are many many disavantages and mistakes about the Electoral College there are a few advantages. Like it takes less time for the congress to vote. But to be honest why rush to fail. by letting the people vote it gives everybody a fair chance to say their oppinion and it has so much less conflict. I admit the congress does know alot but the decesion on the president is going to mostly affect us, the people.
 Everybody has the right to have their own oppinion. In my oppinion I think the people should vote. there are very few things we can do to change things. The congress has power over so much and it it feels like the most people can do is say what we think, even when we know it can't change anything. We the people don't have the power to change much but by letting the people vote it can make a big differnce. the United States is a great place and no one wants to see it go down hill from one wrong mistake. And the solution is very simple, let the people vote. The people's oppinion are very important and need to be heard!

Output: Compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages of the Electoral College and the popular vote in the United States presidential election. Consider factors such as accuracy, fairness, speed, and potential for conflict. Based on your analysis, argue for which method you believe is the most effective and why.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Every summer break, students are given projects in certain classes to make sure they continue to improve over the break.
These projects handed out to the students are always made by the teachers, but what if we change that? Students should one hundred percent be the ones who plan out and create their own summer projects. they know exactly what they need to improve on to be ready for the following year. Students know what they struggled with and what they were good at during the school year.
Teachers can not always grasp what a student may need in order to keep improving. In order for students to recieve any sort of benefit from the summer project, is if they make it themselves.
If I was able to make my own summer project with my classmate I would know what needed to be included in order for me to succeed. teachers tend to make assignments very long, hard, time consuming, and usually very boring. Teachers can overstep because it may not seem like a lot of work to them, but to the students, it is.
They can put in too much information which can make it less benificial to the students. Doing a project over summer break that is not productive, is a huge waste of time. Students might be more willing and excited to do their summer projects if they create it themselves because it will be something they all enjoy doing.
 Most people I know, including me dont start even looking at the projects that the teachers give to us until the night before schools starts, but if we as students create our own we already know what we have to accomplish.
Due to the amount of excitment for their projects, there will be a large increase in the number of students who complete the task and get a good grade, which starts the school year off on a good note.
I always tend to work best and work harder on the subjects and or topics I enjoy the most.
I would also complete my work in full if it was intresting to me.
 Students deserve a long, stressless summer, but with the teacher's stressful assignments, that might not always happen for them.
All students deserve a say in what they do with their time over their own break.
It is fair to them and the teachers.
The summer break projects created by the students will be more productive, less time consuming and more fun for everyone.

Output: How can students benefit from creating their own summer projects instead of receiving assignments from their teachers?


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
The reason people make mistakes,the reason why they have mostly opinions,and the reason why there is some bias Some good reasons for people to ask multiple and not one person to see what there point of view looks like and to take out some opinions One example for this is if your friend says something like chuck y cheese is the worst, that would be an opinion and it would make a bad article, but on the other hand if your friend would have said reasons why chuck y cheese is the worst than that would back up your statement, by saying something like,One reason chuck y cheese is bad is because of the health conditions and list examples to back up the statement that was made. people have different mindsets than others, Which also leads to people thinking differently. What I mean is something like,some people have better writing and talking abilities than others. For example you ask someone why a certain topic like stretching before running is good someone might say,
"Because it's easier to run", and someone else might say
"One reason you should stretch before running is because if you stretch, your muscles will be loosened and more relaxed and there would be less of a risk of getting a cramp". the second person actually used facts about what will happen and the first person only said one thing that was not specific.
 if you dont ask more than one person you won't be able to add even more facts like if someone said, a fact you really liked and you dident ask anyone else and you make an article about it you wont be able to write as much on the article if there is only one thing you can write about. Which could also lead to the article looking way to short and the public wont want to buy it because of the little amount of work that was put into it. if you ask more than one person it could probably change your point of view or your opinion about the topic. like if you said sharks are cute someone else could say, they might be but some things about the shark are that they have a really large mouths,really sharp teeth and some more stuff which might either lead the person to think about why before he thought sharks were cute and now say they are really dangerous or just keep saying the sharks are cute because you have not been anywhere near them yet. because some people know more things than others because of what they might have learned in the past that you havent learned yet. or just things that have to do with religion and where you where born.
 if you dont know the person very well you might not know how smart the person is or if they are lieing to you, if you go to more than one person and they basically all say around the same exact thing, Than whatever the first person said you will know that they were correct about what they said and after you ask the people go on the internet and search about the topic and if there are any words that sound familiar than you will know that you are 100 percent correct. if your not quite sure on how to like publish a book and you ask more than one person you might learn something new and then if someone ask you how to do it you wont just say I dont know anymore you will be saying I absolutely know how to do it which could als help people find or look for jobs. and something else is that if your doing something that is illegal and have friends that dont do it and you want to stop but dont know how to you can maybe ask more than one friend on how to stop which could help you later on becaus you would have multiple ways to stop whatever your doing,
 Instead of only one way that maybe you think is really risky and have to take a chance. Which could really help someone out with their life because you ask somone how to deal with it and you dont like the idea then you can to to your other friend and ask him.

Output: Explain the importance of seeking multiple perspectives when researching and writing an article, including how it can help to eliminate bias and strengthen arguments. Use examples to illustrate how different individuals may have varying levels of knowledge and expertise on a given topic, and how seeking out multiple sources can help to ensure accuracy and depth in one's work.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I believe that when the people of the United States vote for the president it be should be deicided by the popular vote adn not the Electoral College. First, I think the president should be chosen by the popular vote because then all the poeple in that state will have a say not just someone else chosing for them Most people usually chose for themselves because they have the right. Everybody should have a say not just
"the qualified citizens"
writen in source one. Secondly, yes people make bad and somtimes terribles mistakes but thats what we do. The Electoral College has flaws just like anyone or anything else. Like in source two
"the single best argument agaisnt the electoral college is what we might call the disaster factor."
even they make mistakes sometimes. So yes the electoral college might be useful but it can also be very jugdemental. don't you think you have the choice to choose who leads this country? Maybe you don't but some do.

Output: Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using the popular vote versus the Electoral College to elect the President of the United States. Consider the perspectives of different sources and analyze the potential impact on democracy and representation.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
A common phrase teachers enjoy using is "Ask three before me". This phrase is the same way with receiving advice. Asking others before the final decision is an important choice to make. Seeking multiple opinions can help someone make better choices, there are more options when asking for opinions, advice will be different from one person to another, learning plays a big role for making better choices. For example; more people, more choices. If there is a situation of being unsure of what option to take, there are many peers to go to for advice, opening more options.
as well as more options, there is also no absolute wrong or right answer. People automatically believe that there is only one right choice to make, but in most cases that is not true because of the many paths people can choose to go along. Seeing others' views can also help when making better choices. When asking for advice, others will most likely have a different picture in mind than others. The type of advice will be different depending on the person. Going to the right peer for advice is extremely important, rather than going to a bunch of random people for opinions. Another important factor of advice is that it is for consideration. Advice is not a requirement. At the end of the day, it is still the persons decision to make, whether or not they'll make the right choice or not. Most importantly, advice can help in daily lives. using others advice will not only help in the moment, but also in the future. Hearing what others have to say is important for learning good choices. Sometimes, it is hard to learn from the past without someones advice or opinion. as well as that, people are most definitely capable of learning from their previous mistakes. After receiving opinions and thoughts from others, people can learn what they did differently in the past, and correct it. the last big part of the learning section is that we can take others' opinions and learn a life lesson from them. having other opinions is important when realizing past mistakes. In the end, learning will always be a big role in making a better choice. seeking multiple opinions will help people make better choices. There are more options to choose from, advice to take, and lessons to learn from. In the future, we should always ask others for their opinion on the choices we make, depending on the situation. receiving advice is extremely important for making better choices than before. We can learn from our mistakes from the past by hearing what others have to say. We should always speak to more than one person for advice.

Output: Explain the importance of seeking multiple opinions before making a final decision. Use examples to support your argument and discuss how seeking advice can lead to better choices and learning opportunities.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I believe students shouldn't have to do community service if they don't want to. It shouldn't be a priority for students to help. It should be a decided thing whether the student wants to or not. Kids all want to have fun and most students don't want to spend their time doing community service. So why make them? Let kids have fun, let kids decide whether or not they want to do community service. Its the right thing to do. Making it a priority for students to do community service can mess up students education. If the principle made students have a class for community service could you imagine the lack of education the kids can be getting. What about the lack of physical education? What if doing community service took up physical education classes?, How do you think your students would feel? Them not being able to run around and hang out will make them furious if id didn't have physical education I'd be angry too! Yes, i know community service is something to better build your character, but do teenagers really need community service? Sooner or later teenagers will figure out how to become better people. Its all part of growing up. Let your students grow up. So do you rather, making it a priority for your students to do community service or not? Do you rather them miss out on part of their education just to clean a field or to read to little children? Isn't that why we have teachers? Or do you want your students to be mad at their principle because there's not time to hang out or get all their energy out? Take it from me a student myself, you should let students have time to hang out its the best thing for kids our age. Making kids do community service may take that time up. Don't make it a priority for community service! Community service is not that big a deal!

Output: Discuss the pros and cons of making community service a priority for students. In your essay, argue whether or not students should be required to participate in community service and provide evidence to support your position. Consider the impact on students' education, physical activity, and personal growth.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: When you make a decision, you want to make the most people happy possible. So why would you only ask one person? You should ask a lot of people it can help you make the best choice possible, It can help better the chances of making more people happy, it gives you a better source of knowledge When making a decision, you want to make the best choice. That is what anyone making a decision would try to do. But it is hard to make the best choice when only choosing one person to talk to. If you talk to one person, then you only make the choice on what one person wants, and everyone else that the choice is affecting may not like the decision that was made. So when making a decision ask more than one person, in fact ask a lot of people so you can make a decision that the majority or even all of the people involved will like. When you talk to just one or two people, they cant give you an accurate result of what other people are going to want, everyone else doesnt want just one or two people deciding their fate. They would feel more safe with the decision if everyone was asked so the decider could find the best thing to do, and make the right decision for everyone. One person should not be in control in the outcome of the choice. Which is another reason why asking more people what to do is a good choice. Your source is so more reliable when you ask a lot of people. When you ask one person they are deciding what is best for themselves, rather than what is best for more people. But when you ask a large ammount of people, they can help you decide what is the best choice for everyone, and not just for one person. That makes the group of people a very reliable source to base your decision off of. The most reliable source of knowledge, making the most people happy, and making the best overall decision. These are three reasons why asking a lot of people for their opinions is better than using one person. So why would someone just ask one person for their opinion? I have no idea, but I do know that asking more people is the best option for everyone. If you are faced with a hard decision now or in the future, just remember that it is always better to ask for a lot of peoples opinions on the choice, rather than just one or two people.

Output: Explain why it is important to seek the opinions of multiple people when making a decision, and how this can lead to a better outcome for everyone involved. Provide examples to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Summer projects should be teacher designed and not student designed. When designing a project over the summer, a teacher's design will be more structured, with a clear goal for the overall project.  with teacher's knowing what skills and materiel students need to learn, they will be able to design a proper and well throughout project that will keep the students on their feet. when it comes to summer, the last thing on a students mind is school based learning. So, lots of students will either procrastinate or create a poorly designed project leading to no continuation of learning over the break A teacher is someone who has learned the ins and outs of school based learning, who went to college and received a teaching degree, and has a specialized learning in usually one or more subjects. Summer for students resembles a break from school. Whether that means traveling to the Bahamas or staying home, a student does not want even the slightest thought of school in their mind. Some might say that student-designed projects allow a more personalized and creative component. Additionally, students will be able to design a project they enjoy learning. This is true, but not just for student designed projects. Like students, teachers can design different types or styles of projects allowing all types of learning for the student. For example, a teacher can design a project for mechanical engineering, biology, political sciences, Algebra 2, or more, allowing multiple choices for the student to choose. Also no matter what project design a student receives, the topics will be broad, giving space for creative thinking. The teacher-designed projects won't just give students space for creative opportunities but also flexibility with their decision. When it comes to summer projects, teachers should be the ones designing them. They are specialist in learning and know what further steps students need to take to learn. With the teachers clear design instructions and guidance, it will make summer learning much easier and efficient. Teacher designed projects aren't just helpful for students but teachers as well. When grading or examining the projects, that they designed, it will be easier for them to grade and compare to other students. So when in comes to whether summer projects should be either student-designed or teacher designed, teacher-designed is the way to go and will assure a continuation of learning during the summer break.

Output: Discuss the benefits of teacher-designed summer projects compared to student-designed projects in terms of promoting continued learning during the break.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
My position is that self-driving cars should be manufactured and eventually should be sold to the general public. The cars wouldn't fix all of the problems that come along with cas accidents and problems but it can help reduce them. The reason why self-driving cars should be manufactured is because it can stop ,or help prevent less accidents from happening. If theres less people in the car, then there are less people to get hurt ,and if the car is driving it going to be safe to have the car drive its self because its programed to make the best decision to keep the passenger others safe. BMW is making a car with a in-car safety feature to reduce the use of cellphones being used while behind the wheel. California, Nevada, Florida, and the District of Columbia have all allowed limited use of semi-autonomous cars. Companies and people wouldn't want to make or buy the cars if they weren't proven to be as safe as possible. It also said in paragraph 5, that they have cars that auto lock the breaks to make it safer. Self driving cars could also reduce the percentage of DUI related car accidents, and deaths by having the car drive for you instead of anyone risking getting put in jail or getting pulled over. Paragraph 4 also says that the cars will have a lot of sensors on them to detect any obstacles and for the car to be aware of its surroundings at all times.
 In conclusion I think that self-driving cars should be made because they can help better the world and the future ahead by reducing the percentage of accidents, and problems that human drivers put themselves at risk to.

Output: Explain the benefits of manufacturing and selling self-driving cars to the general public, including how they can reduce accidents and improve safety on the roads. Use examples such as BMW's in-car safety feature and the use of sensors to detect obstacles. Discuss how self-driving cars can also reduce the percentage of DUI-related accidents and deaths. Finally, address the importance of proving the safety of these cars before they are made and sold to the public.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Places around that world are starting to make there cities and other places a better place. Some cities like Vauban are making their town a car free zone. Others are just making it one day that cars cant be seen on the roads just taxis and other companies can Based on the information in source one some are saying that they are living a better life without cars in the town Heidrun said that now that he dosen't have a car he is happier then before. In Europe cars are only responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas unlike the united states 50 percent of pollution is in some parts. Vauban's basic life style is being adopted around the world in making suburbs a better place. Paris has said that on mondays everyone should leave their cars at home and that only companies were able to drive there cars. Also that anyone that would use there car when told not to will be fine $31. Also beijing China is known as one of the most polluted cities in the world. More diesel fuel is used in france then in all westeren Europe whitch is not a good thing. In Colombia a city named Bogota had made it that one day of every year that cars would be banned from the streets and this their 3rd year doing it. People that road their cars would be fined $25. Even though it was raining that didn't stop people from walking and taking the bus or a taxi. For the first time two other cities join Bogota with no cars for the day. This city has had more bicycle paths then any other Latin American city. Parks have bloomed and sidewalkes have been fix making it better for the city and better for the people that walk and go to the park

Output: Discuss the trend of cities around the world implementing car-free zones or car-free days, and the impact it has on the environment and quality of life for residents. Use examples from Vauban, Paris, Beijing, and Bogota to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: How can aliens live their! It can not be true! Having aliens on Mars has been a big arguement for some time now. Some people may think that aliens planted or made this mysterious face on Mars. If aliens made the face they would have tracings of something odd on the face. In paragrpah 12 its tells you how the picture actually shows the Martian equivalent to a butte or mesa, which is landforms around the American West. The face on mars is about the same height as the lava dome that takes up a form of an isolated mesa. The pictures in the beginning of the passage you can see that in 1976 the object looked like a face, but in 2001 the object looks like broken down sand. Next, the scientist does not have proof that it could be any signs of aliens surviving on Mars. In paragraph 7 it say that thousands of anxious web surfers were waiting when the image first appeared on a JPL web site , reavealing a natural landform. Also in paragraph 3 it pronounced that the face was a huge rock formation. Which resembles a human head formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes , noes, and mouth (3). Finally, The face on mars just was a thing to benefit NASA. It states in paragraph 3 in the end that it would be a good way to engage the public and attract attention to Mars. This face became into something huge. It has become a pop icon, starred in a Hollywood film, apperead in books, magazines, radio talk shows, and grocery lines. This face on mars was just put into the public to have attention drawn to NASA. In conclusion, their were no aliens on Mars planting faces because, the face on Mars was just a benefit to Nasa, there was not any proof or sign of aliens on Mars, and it looked equivalent to a butte or mesa. Most people know that their were not any aliens on Mars because their was not any proof. One day researchers might find traces of aliens!

Output: Explain the controversy surrounding the "face on Mars" and provide evidence to support the argument that it is not evidence of alien life on the planet.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: What kinds of things happen at your house? Is it loud or quiet? Is there a lot of people at home or almost no one? Some schools offer distance learning as an option for students to attend classes from home by way of online or video conferencing. While this may be helpful to some students at specific times, it is not beneficial for them. Students are children who are still in the process of learning and are still adapting to the world around them. Distance learning is not beneficial for students they can be easily distracted at home, they could have electronic complications, they could develop little to no social skills. Distance learning is not helpful towards students because they can be easily distracted at home. Within a person's personal area, people have a tendency to relax and forget about the things that need to be done. Personally, I have forgotten about many assignments that were due the next day simply because I was relaxing in my room. I was aware that I needed to do my homework, but I had thought that I could watch YouTube for a few minutes and still be able to complete my work. After I watched one video, I saw another that I was interested in, and soon I had forgotten about my assignments that were due the next day. I forgot about my work because I wasn't in a suitable environment for me to focus on my work. Another example to show how easily distracted students are at home would be their family. While I was trying to work on an essay for English, my sister was being rowdy and playful. She had came into my room for a split second and ran back out leaving my door open in that same moment. This allowed for the sound of my mother's T.V. to come into my room and I wasn't able to concentrate on the topic of my essay any longer. Families are distracting when you are trying to work on things like homework, essays, and projects. A home is not quiet enough for you to focus and there are too many distractions that your family can cause. Seeing as distance learning is through online or video conferencing, students may have electronic complications. Computers can do various things but they aren't without faults. My friend, Generic_Name, had tried to do an assignment that needed to be done online but the weather wasn't exactly favorable for her. The rain had caused some neighborhoods to lose electricity and Generic_Name's neighborhood was one of them. She wasn't able to finish her assignment on time and had gotten a lower grade than she would have liked. Technology can't be relied upon to do work when the weather can destroy your efforts and make it seem like you didn't try at all. There are also malfunctions that could happen to the technology that the student is working on. My friend, Generic_Name, had tried to type up his summer reading project when his computer had suddenly shutdown. Generic_Name soon discovered that his laptop had a virus and he needed to get a new one. As he was setting up his new laptop, he had tried going back to his project but it hadn't saved his progress so he had to start from scratch all over again. Electronics can have faults at times like getting viruses or there might not be any service where the student is at. This leads things to be difficult and the situation can get worse over time. The internet isn't safe and technology isn't always the best option to use to work on things. Students could develop little to no social skills if they were to take distance learning. Distance learning is an education gained through a computer rather than being lectured and helped in person. Learning through a computer doesn't give you the necessary social skills you need to go through life. When I'm in class with a teacher, I'm able to ask that teacher questions. While you can also do that online, the interactions are completely different. You are behind a screen with possibly no one around you. Getting an education this way will damage your social skills unless you are socializing with people outside of your home and neighborhood. Online learning doesn't allow you to interact with your classmates or your teacher. You need to be able to talk properly to people you don't know because once you graduate you have to speak to the people around you to understand current situations or to get a job. Every job includes some interaction with a person face-to-face, and if your social skills aren't good then you will struggle until they get better. I'm a shy person but being able to interact with people in person has improved my social skills. You don't have to talk to someone for long periods of time, but don't stay behind a computer screen. Go out in the world and talk to someone you haven't before; you may even become close friends in the future. The people you interact with are going to be important to you in some way, positive or negative, and without them you are going to be lost in life. Distance learning is good for when a student is sick or out of town, but it isn't good as an option to fully learn online. There are many issues that can happen like you won't get the grade you are working for or you broke your computer so now you can't learn until you replace your old one. In order to get by in life, you need to be able to talk to people in person and be able to understand what you are doing. Are you going to get by in life by being behind a screen? Are you going to travel around and explore new places and talk to new people? What are your plans for the future?

Output: Discuss the potential drawbacks of distance learning for students, including distractions at home, electronic complications, and the potential for limited social skills development. Use personal examples and research to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
What would the world be like if we could just type in your wanted destination and just go withoug needing a driver, how would the world react for such a thing?
Could the car just think on it's own? How would everything even work on the car? In my opinion, we shouldn't have driverless cars untill we can get them to be fully driverless without taking away so many taxi jobs, wrecks, and confusion during them wrecks.
 I don't think that we should have driverless cars, because taxi companies would loose all their emploies, it would save the company money but, also what about that families? How are they going to get their next meal on the table without a job? Driverless cares would leave people hungry and jobless, then their kids would be taken by DCS and them the ' family ' would be seperated. Meaning driverless cars are bad for the people because it can cause poverty among the people. Also, driverless cars could cause many wrecks by not having exact measurment of when to stop And much of the driving laws include a person to be driving. How would the car get it's licentce ? Would it have a liceence? When driving you use your brain a car doesnt have a brain aso it wouldn't work out for them. In other words, you need a person , a driver, still to have a driverless car ; so would it really be considered a driverless car? No.
 Then, theres the part when they do get into a wreck, who's fault would it be because there isn't a driver to blame? who do they sue? how wouold insurence be on a driverless care? The company who manerfaactured the car would be the one to blame because they should have prepared for the situation, also they would be the ones the be sued. It's just a bad idea all together because the company will go bankruped.
 So, think again, how would the world be if there was a such thing as driverless cars? would it be good or would it be bad? we already know that its gonna be a bad idea so why am i even asking you ? It's bad because iit takes jobs from hardworking drivers, causes wreacks, and confustion. So, driverless cars for all is a NO GO.

Output: Discuss the potential impact of driverless cars on society, including the effects on employment, safety, and legal liability. Consider both the benefits and drawbacks of this technology and provide a well-supported argument for whether or not driverless cars should be implemented on a large scale.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
In the article "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" the author gives us reasons why exploring Venus would be very difficult. But, at the same time, the author gives us reasons why it's important to explore Venus. It's because Venus is Earth like, and so we might be able to visit it one day. The article "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" states, "Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and occasionally rhe losest in distance too" This is very important, it means that because that Venus is Earth like, as well as the closest planet to earth at times, its important to learn about it, in case we need to go to it at anytime.
 At the end, the artivle also states, "Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meed the very edges on imagination and innovation." This means that even though it's dangerouse to go to Venus, we shouldn't help us hold it back, space is a very dangerous place, and if we let us hold us back, we won't get anywhere, and Fast.

Output: Discuss the challenges and importance of exploring Venus, as highlighted in the article "The Challenge of Exploring Venus".


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
There are alot of rumors going around about "Unmasking the face on Mars." Many say that it is a face that was created by the aliens in Mars. However, this is not true. Scientists in NASA have background information that states that it is a Martian mesa. The rumor of " Unmasking the Face on Mars" is false because scientists have background research proving it isn't, authors influenced readers to think that it was, the scientists used higher quality cameras. Scientist have done so much background research on this topic of the "face" to prove that their statement is true. The scientists statement was that it was another Martian mesa. Martian mesa's are very common in the Cydonia area. Only that this one had unusual shadows that made it look like a face. Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiter camera team snapped a picture ten times sharper than the original Viking photos. Only to reveal that they were correct, it was just a natural landform. What the picture actually showed was butte or mesa, which are landforms that are common around the American West. Authors influenced many readers to think that it was a face so they could engage them. When NASA unvieled the image for the public to see the caption quoted, " huge rock formation... which resembles a human head, formed by shadows giving the illusions of eyes, nose, and a mouth." Many authors thought this would be a good way to engage the public and attract attention to Mars. To their suprise it did catch many readers attention. The " Face on Mars" starred in a hollywood film, appeared in books, magazines, radio talk shows. and even haunted grocery store checkout lines for 25 years. People thought the face was a bona fide evidence of life on Mars, evidence that NASA would prefer to hide. However, defenders on the NASA budget wish there was an acient civilization on Mars. Scientists took several pictures to prove their point. Another thing scientists did was take several pictures to see different points of views and from different angles. The first picture taken of the "face" was on the
NASA Viking 1. The second picture taken was on the Mars orbiter Camera which snapped a picture that was ten times sharper than the original Viking photos. These pictures clearly proved that it was a natural land formation, a mesa, which were very common in that area. The rumor of " Unmasking the Face on Mars" is false because scientists have background research proving it isn't, authors influenced readers, and the scientists used higher quality cameras. These are the reasons how the "face" on Mars was never true.

Output: Explain why the rumor of "Unmasking the Face on Mars" is false, citing evidence from scientists, authors, and the use of higher quality cameras.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
First of all,Driverless cars are a great idea to have in the future because it helps prevent alot of accidents and would be cool to have. I think they should do more stuff to the driverless car like add a entertainment center so the driver would be entertained and more people would probably be interested in buying one in the future. Driverless cars would be wonderful to have in the future because they can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves without a human having to do anything and it would notify a human driver to take over when the situation requires.
Also, manufactures are considering to use cameras to watch the driver while the driver watches the road, the car watches the driver so that the driver is not texting or doing other things while driving, which would prevent accidents or being pulled over and given a ticket. A negative thing about having a driverless car is that drivers would get bored when waiting for their turn to drive. But, some manufactures hope to bring in some car enterainment and information systems so that the driver would be entertained in having something to do when they´re not driving. Finally, driverless cars would be great to have in the future because it has all this new technology inside that would keep you safe and entertained when you´re not driving. Although, driverless cars has some negative things about it that would need work on but overall, I would reccomend it to people to buy in the future. Also, this specific car would help prevent alot of accidents and deaths from a regular car because a driverless car has a camera to watch what you´re doing so you are safe.

Output: Discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of driverless cars, including their ability to prevent accidents and the possibility of incorporating entertainment systems. Consider the use of cameras to monitor drivers and the potential for boredom while waiting for a turn to drive. Evaluate the overall potential of driverless cars and make a recommendation for their future use.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: it gives differnt views, it helps puts heads together, the other person can give advice on a situation. 60% more men commite suicide than women do. Thats because men don't share their feelings or anything to anyone. Another person can look at it in a positive way while you look at it in a negetive way. Looking at it in a good way can make the situation so much better for you and anyone who is imvolved in it. if that other person can make you think positive that it can take so much stress off your body and so many other people around you. For example If your kid puts ramon noodles in the microwave wihout any water than it catches on fire but he diden't burn the house down then just focuse of the bright side. The house is still in great condition and its not burned down. More heads works better than just one head dealing with that situation. More people's options on it can make you think/ look at it in a whole diffen't stand point. You can ask for someone's option and you might treally not agree with you on it but they might have a really good reason and facts to prove their option. For example if one of your friends calls you about the math homework and you both don't know what to do then you can put your heads together and try to figure it out. Giving advice can go both ways in a heated situation between anything. You can give someone advice o how there doing in math like you saw their math test score and you give them advice on how to study. They cantake that so far and think you think they're dumb or stupid. Or you can give someone advice about their relashonship. If they have never been in a relashionship before tell them the basics or how to treat a girl right or just anything good that helps build a good relationship with their partner. For example if your best friend comes to you for advice on how to make a girl happy or atleast show her that you love her or atleast care about her than you need to tel him how to do that because it might be his first one or no girl has treated him right and he's scared to love someone again. Going to someone for mulitiple options can be bad or can be good. Giving someone advice,more options on a decion or more views on a decions can really help someone thats stressed out about it. Help smeone who comes to you for help it means a lot to them.

Output: Explain the importance of seeking advice and multiple perspectives in dealing with stressful situations, using the example of the higher rate of suicide among men due to their reluctance to share their feelings. Discuss how seeking advice and considering different viewpoints can lead to a more positive outlook and better outcomes in various situations, such as relationships and academic challenges.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I find this idea very smart, but yet unfair. A grade of a C is a average grade. People with a C average should be able to be on the team, but maybe just not play in the games. The students are on the team so they can be able to play in the games. So by not letting them play in the games, they will work hard to bring their average up. Maybe some type of motivation will help them like saying if you get your average up, you will get a week off homework . Instead of kicking them off the team, give them a little leeway. Just make them sit the bench a couple games and then they will learn to work harder. academics come before sports. The students will not have sports when it comes to real life. In order to get a job, you have to be well educated and ready. It doesn't matter how good of an athlete you are, sports won't be there all your life. if the student is trying his very best, you have to consider. The student may not be the brightest kid is the world, but if he is giving the best he can do, second think just kicking him off the team. Doing the best you can in everything is really all that matters. If you can do that, you are in good shape for everyday life.
 you have to think about what you are doing. I'm not saying that a C average is good, but don't be that hard. Make the student have some more time maybe before practice to get his work done and study a little bit. That will help a lot. Because more than likely, he does not have that much time when he gets home to do homework, depending on the practice time.

Output: Should students with a C average be allowed to play in sports games? Discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of allowing these students to participate in sports, and propose possible solutions to encourage academic improvement while still allowing them to be part of the team.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Limiting the amount of driving allowed and having car-free cities can have several benefits by reducing the amount of air pollution and traffic jams Some disadvantages of having car-free cities are time management and paying fines to drive. Greenhouse gasses can be reduced by limiting driving in cities and having car free cities. About 50 percent of greenhouse gasses are from passenger cars in some cities in the United States and 12 percent in Europe. There were about 80 micrograms of particulate per cubic meter in London and 114 in Brussels. Paris has the most air pollution with 147 micrograms per cubic meter.
 Paris has 67 percent of its vehicles run on diesel fuel, which is blamed for most of the air pollution. The rest of Western Europe has an average of 53.3 percent of vehcicles fueled by diesel. Car emissions are traped from the warm air caused by cold nights and warm days. A partial ban was created in Paris for driving to reducce the amount of pollution. Drivers with even number license plates could drive on certain days and odd number plates would drive on other days. After only five days the air pollution was down by 60 percent. In Bogota there are car free days and 118 miles of bicycle paths were constructed and the amount of traffic jams during rush hour were down by almost half. Limiting driving will lower the amount of traffic and it made several people happier. Most public transportation was free on weekends. When driving was not allowed, people would be walking and riding bikes. Most people in car free cities enjoyed the sound of children instead of hearing the sound of motors all of the time. Public transportation was allowed every day and it reduced the amount of traffic with having fewer cars on the streets and roads.

When driving on days then it's not allowed the drivers have to pay fines. In Paris drivers with even number license plates would drive on certain days andodd numbers drive on the other days. If someone is driving on the wrong day there is a fine of 22 euors or 31 dollars for each day that they drive when they can't. In bogota there is a 25 dollar fine for driving on car free days. Time management is another problem when someone can't drive their car. Going to work would take longer when walking, riding a bike or using the public transportation.

having car free cities and limitin driving can be good for reducing the amount of air pollution and the amount of traffic out on the roads. Some people feel happier when they live in a car free city because they feel like they have less stress but some people dont like paying fines when they are driving their car on certain days.

Output: Discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of limiting driving and implementing car-free cities in terms of reducing air pollution and traffic congestion. Consider the impact on greenhouse gas emissions, particulate matter levels, and public health. Additionally, analyze the potential challenges of time management and fines for driving on restricted days. Provide examples of successful implementation of car-free policies in cities such as Paris and Bogota and evaluate their effectiveness.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I would say that we keep the Electoral College because it has worked over the past century so why change it now. The people voting don't always know what they want in a president they might be undecided and just choose the best looking one I mean yeah some have their facts straight and know how the president they are voting is going to help the united states become a better country overall When people have to much freedom they don't know what to do and do wrong choices so i think choosing a elector is a good thing they have studied the president and have heard countless promises that he has done. I mean he or she most likley will vote for the candiate running for president you did because he or she is a elector he or she gets the people who also voted for the same person as he or she wants. I mean we people are still voting we still have the vote just that our vote goes to choosing a certain elector instead of just directly leaving it to the people to vote for a ceratin candiate running for president. By this the number is much smaller since each country is weighed and is worth certain points and decided by electors you choosed to trust to vote for the same president you did. You still are in control just that you choose somebody he/her is not likely to change his or her mind and vote for the exact person you want he or she to vote for. It stated in the article that "Each candidate running for president in your state has his or her own group of electors. The electors are generally chosen by the candiate's politcal party." I say that if the candidate political party chooses the electors then they must be good and the party must be sure the elector won't change his mind out of no where. This does make the candiate running for president try to convience the electors he is the one they need and that he will help our country be better. This also helps the candiate running for president know what states he should go to since some states they already know they lost It stated in the article that "A solid regional favorite, such as Romney was in the south,has no incentive to campaign heavily in those states, for he gains no electoral votes by increasing his plurality in states that he knows he will win."So this keeps the president from having to go to every state because its just no based of popular vote and want every individual person votes for. I think the Electoral college is great and well organized the process is good and the only thing is does is make the voting process more easier and ordered. I think we should keep it i mean it has had his troubles her and there but it has worked so good for such a long time. We don't want to change it and create choas since a lot of people are not use to change and don't take it quite well

Output: Explain the benefits of the Electoral College system and argue for its continuation in the United States presidential elections, citing its effectiveness over the past century and the role of electors in ensuring informed and responsible voting.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: So the other day I was working at NASA just like everyday and something was brought up that I had never heard before. What was brought up was that back in the 70's, NASA's Viking 1 spacecraft was circling the planet snapping photos of possible landing sites for its sister ship Viking 2, it spotted a shadowy likeness of a human face. An enormous head nearly two miles away from end to end seemed to be staring back at the cameras from a top region of the Red Planet called Cydonia. The person who said this out loud said it was just formations called butte or mesa's which are very common around the American West. What happened was pretty normal at NASA. One of my co workers blurted out it was probably created by aliens. More people started agreeing with him because how else could a human looking face get on a planet that nobody ever talked about. It started to have me thinking about space and all the crazy things that happen, so I decided to do some research when I got home. I looked around the internet, and went to the public library to look for some books about rock formatons on different planets. Once I got those, I finally began research and what I found was shocking I believe that the face on Mars is not and ancient alein artifact rock formations form on every planet pictures can be deceving there is no scientific proof that aliens have ever existed. I believe that the face found on Mars is not an ancient alien artifact because rock formations form on every planet. research has shown that the face found on Mars looksv like lanforms common around the American West. As far as people know, that face could have just gotten there from some sort of sand storm on the big red planet back in the 70's. Another thing that people shold know is that pictures can be deceving. I believe that the face found on Mars was not an ancient alien artifact because pictures can be deciving What scientist knew back then, and what they know now is a lot different. There is much more technological advances now then there were back then, so the picture quality from space wasn't very good. It was very pixelated, not clear, and didn't give very much information It is understandable that people thought it was an alien head thats just not the truth The picture quality now is at the highest its ever been so people can see pictures a lot more clearly. Each pixel in the 2001 image spans 1.56 meters, compared to 43 meters per pixel in the best 1976 Viking photo. That proves that the image was very deceving and not many people could figure out what it most likely looked like. One more thing that people should really know is that there is no scientific proof that aliens ever existed. I believe that the face on Mars was not an anciet alien artifact because there is no scientific proof that aliens ever existed Back in the 70's people thought that aliens were real because the technology wasn't very good, and people olny believed what they were told. In the latest years though, Scientists have no evidence that aliens are real. This proves that there couldn't have been an anciet cicilization of aliens. Because of these facts, I believe that the face found on Mars was not an ancient alien artifact becaue rock formations can be found on every planet, pictures can be deceving, and there is no scientific proof that aliens ever existed.

Output: Explain why the author believes that the face found on Mars is not an ancient alien artifact, citing evidence such as rock formations on every planet, the deceiving nature of pictures, and the lack of scientific proof of alien existence.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Have you ever awoken to the arrogant, angry shriek of your alarm clock on a Monday morning? Maybe you have even experienced the arctic splash of freezing cold water falling over your back as your mom struggled to pry you from a deep sleep. It is apparent that waking up for school each morning is one of the most dreadful moments a student will face. A potential solution to this issue is the introduction of online classes and video conferences Through this much more compatible, modern way of learning, students would be less restricted and undoubtedly happier. By establishing the opportunity to attend classes from home, students will be able to spend significantly more time with their loved ones obtain important skills including responsibility and time management even be able to improve their sleep schedules. Recently, it has become difficult for students to spend enough time at home with their families, or even to establish a strong social life. Between countless extracurriculars, hours of homework, and demanding jobs, there is hardly enough time to relax, let alone spend time with anyone. By allowing students to attend classes at home, they will be given endless, new opportunities to enjoy their families. It will become possible to cook breakfast with their parents or play outside with their siblings. This improved way of learning will also allow for more time for students to make memories with their friends, an important part of any child's life. The importance of family and friendship is undeniable in the development of a child's mind; therefore, it should be more easily available to students It could be argued that instead of creating online classes, students should just eliminate activities like sports or clubs from their unbending schedules. However, these extracurriculars actually account for most of the social skills and companionships students must gain to grow as people Involvement in extracurricular activities is an active choice that students make; it is something that many youth desire, no matter the free time it may drain. School, however, is usually unenjoyable and forced onto students. Clearly, creating the option for students to attend online classes is a much more reasonable idea Through the implementation of this technological advancement, students will be able to bond with their families and friends. As students grow older, they must obtain certain life skills to guide them through experiences in college and the working world. By allowing students to attend online classes, they will learn to become much more responsible. Without a bell persistently ringing to keep students on time or teachers smiling beside each classroom to remind them of upcoming due dates, they will learn to manage their time wisely and keep a consistent schedule. They will also learn to be more self-accountable and independent. Such skills are necessary in any aspect of life, and students will be better equipped as they begin their journey through college or the workforce. By utilizing the idea of online schooling, students will be prepared to handle themselves as they independently face and overcome the real world.
 Students struggle to get enough sleep because of the demanding schedule that school establishes. They usually arrive at school with heavy eyelids and stiff bodies, because it is utterly too early for them to be awake, let alone to learn. Studies have actually proven that detrimental health issues, including depression and anxiety, typically stem from lack of sleep. Because of students' biological clocks, waking up later is the only reasonable solution Without rearranging the entire day, this issue cannot be adequately addressed by school systems Thus, the option of online classes should be implemented in schools around the world. By allowing students to choose what time they wake up and begin their classes each day, they will be much less groggy and irritable. Their uncontrollable stress levels will significantly decrease, and their mindsets will positively progress. Student health should consistently be a top priority, and the most achievable step toward this is the improvement of their sleep schedules. Online schooling would largely help in accomplishing this. Online classes and video conferences have the chance to make a real difference in students' lives, if they are just given the opportunity. This advanced version of learning would create bonds between students and their loved ones, provide important life skills to children, and improve student health and sleeping patterns. By implementing online classes, students will be able to discover an entirely new world of learning. School will be much more enjoyable, and students will even progress into better people through online schooling. Make online classes an option, and observe as students become much more engaged in not only the world of learning, but in the world itself.

Output: How can the implementation of online classes and video conferences improve the overall well-being and academic success of students?


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Middle school, where the days seem to drag on hour by hour, just waiting, living until the next bell. Millions of students across America suffer from this treacherous cycle everyday. Although millions suffer from this process, not all students go home just to repeat it all over again. A large majority of people participate in at least one extracurricular activity no matter if it is just being on the student council, playing sports, or simply being in the yearbook club, it makes school so much more enjoyable. Not only does this give teenagers something to look forward to after school, but it also give them something to strive for in and out of the school day. These activities also teach students a variety of essential life lessons that they could never learn in school. students should be required to take part in at least one extracurricular activity. people can learn time management fall in love with something that they would never have tried it forces people to figure out their main priorities in life. People often find themselves overwhelmed with how much they have to do and how little time they have to do it. Taking part in more activities outside of school can help to teach these people how to manage their time properly so that they can avoid the overwhelming feeling that drags them down. students might not get to their homework because they have taken too much time to do other unimportant things since they are unable to manage their time. This can be fixed by giving these people something else to work on so that they are required to be disciplined enough to get everything done. Learning time management also helps students receive more free time than ever before since they know to do the important things first and be done with it. These time management skills will also help people much further down the road of life. Many young teenagers are often too timid to step out of their comfort zone on their own, so sometimes they might need a little push to get started. There are so many positives to trying new things like joining clubs or sports Extracurricular activities can do so much for people in life and some will never get to experience that drive and love that comes with those activities. If these students never try something new they will miss and opportunity of a lifetime and miss out on so many friendships Michael Phelps' mom made him sign up for swimming as a precaution because she did not want him to drown. After that, he ended up falling in love with the sport and going farther than he could have ever imagined. A large majority of middle school students have absolutely no clue of what they want to do in the future or what their main concerns are because they have nothing to worry about other than school Extracurricular activities would help them figure out what their main priorities are exactly. If they are concerned about these activities, it would help them make better decisions in order to keep those priorities straight. These responsible actions would assist in the process of figuring out what students want to pursue in the future and therefore make it easier to accomplish a goal because they would have been working towards it for a long time. there are countless reasons why students should be required to participate in extracurricular activities, some specific reasons being that they teach proper time management, could show you how much you love something, and assist in figuring out main priorities in life. There are so many positives that they outweigh any negatives that could arise. These life lessons will expand and travel so far with people in their journey. Some students may never do these activities after middle school, but at least they will have taken a small part in some of the most moving learning experiences ever known to school system.

Output: Explain the benefits of participating in extracurricular activities for middle school students, including how it can teach time management, help students discover their passions, and assist in figuring out their main priorities in life. Argue why students should be required to participate in at least one extracurricular activity.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: i argue you that we keep the electoral collage because of its many pros Taking away the electoral college would be like taking away an important part of our U.S history the founding fathers established it in the constitution as a compromise between election of the president by a vote in congress and election of the president by a popular vote of qualified citizens. With the electoral college there would be more discussion on the topic of making smart descions to electing a president Keeping the electoal college will keep a professional way of electing a president. The electoral college selects a slate of electors trusted to vote for the partys nominee (and the trust given is rarely betrayed). With that said, it will be a fair and most likely a cheat free zone. The electoral college avoids the problem of elections in which no canidate receives a majority of the votes cast When a run off happens this creates pressure of the voters, until the help of the electoral college comes in, which in this case helps break everything up and claim a true winner. For example, in 1968 nixon and clinton in 1992 both had only 43 percent plurality of the popular votes, while winning a majority in the electoral college, 301 and 370 electoral votes, respectively. And that concludes why i argue you to keep the electoal college and not popular vote.

Output: Write an essay arguing for the retention of the electoral college in the United States presidential election process. Discuss the historical significance of the electoral college and its role in ensuring a fair and professional election process. Analyze the benefits of the electoral college, including its ability to prevent run-off elections and ensure a majority vote for the winning candidate. Use specific examples, such as the 1968 and 1992 presidential elections, to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Have you ever been on the road and almost got into a wreck? Majority of the time these accidents are caused by negligent drivers. These individuals tend to ignore the rules of the road, and operate their motor vehicles while on their mobile devices which results in 1 out of every 4 accidents. Is a text message, or the next level of Candy Crush more important than your well-being, and the welfare of others. In many cases accidents are caused by distracted drivers. As the National Safety Council has reported, phone usage on the road can lead to 1.6 million or more accidents a year. This leads to a total of 390,000 or more injuries and deaths a year. This is a fairly large number and the problem needs to be dealt with. Due to these shocking statistics on distracted driving, a law or regulations must be put into place to prevent these tragedies. For instance, the government could implement having fining to any individuals caught with their mobile devices in hand. However, in most cases this won't stop an individual from doing what they want. So what I propose is a two strike law. This would implement at first heavy fining. However if the individual continues to cause problems, it may result in the permanent suspension of their license. The question now is; What happens to the individuals who cause deaths do to their negligence? Simple, They will be fined and imprisoned for vehicular manslaughter. You may be wondering why my views on this subject are so harsh? It is quite simple; I have been in an accident due to distracted drivers. When I was young riding around with my mother, a distracted driver rear-ended us, taking off the bumper. The shocking part is, if my mother had slowed down even a little, I would not be here to express my concerns. I believe that all people should strive for safety when it comes to driving. As many wise elders say, "It is not the road you must fear, but the other drivers." Finally, I wish to express how distracted driving could be permanently purged from the world. Due to the increasing advances in technology, companies could begin to create self-driving cars. This will eliminate any potential risk of distracted driving, due to the fact, the individual is not driving. However, with the people who may not have the means to purchase such a vehicle, I recommend either purchasing a taxi such as an Uber or Lyft. The real productive way to stop all distracted driving would be to simply put down the phone while driving, and if it is a serious emergency pull to the side of the road where you are no longer a danger to yourself or others.

Output: Discuss the issue of distracted driving and propose a solution to prevent accidents caused by negligent drivers. Use statistics and personal experiences to support your argument and consider the potential effectiveness of implementing fines, license suspension, and imprisonment for vehicular manslaughter. Additionally, explore the possibility of self-driving cars and alternative transportation options as a means to eliminate distracted driving.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Warm and soothing waves of light, the eloquent smell of nature and the outdoors, summer is indeed here. For some, summer is a much needed break from the institutional grind of schooling in America, however for others it irritates their stress. Often, students worry about the projects assigned over the summer, because they're usually tedious and require an exorbitant amount of time to complete. Although it is noted that they're a source of stress to many students, schools maintain that these projects are needed to continuously engage the students in the learning process. This predicament can be resolved by allowing students to design their own projects, which adequately shows their learning throughout the summer. Summer projects should be student-designed, to engage students in learning, allow them to be cooperative amongst each other, prevent the monotonous nature of education in America. Students in America struggle throughout their life attending school while accepting the burden of friendships, family and other stresses and anxieties. Summer becomes that safe haven for them, to completely decompress from their issues and take a break from the mental strain of schools, with all the tests, exams and projects that're encompassed within it. Students who are allowed the opportunity to design their own project become eager to create a product which displays their learning over the summer. Once in my freshman year, I was given an option to complete a teacher-assigned book report, or to construct an independent book report. Being allowed this opportunity made me eager to chose a book that satisfied my interests, and not be punished to endure reading a four hundred page book about trivial history. This point illustrates the impact that student-designed summer projects can instill, without the students feeling punished by the school. Learning should be a process of critical thinking and analysis, however when this process is interrupted by an external predetermined body it is detrimental to one's education. Cooperation is a skill which gives people the ability to build upon each others strengths and weaknesses, and is the source of many significant discoveries. Often we see that the scientific community caters to its researchers by promoting peer-reviewed journals and research to be conducted. This sentiment holds true with education in America. In order for students to learn over the summer, they should be encouraged to produce their own projects with individuals whom they spend their time with during the summer. I recall being pestered by taking on the burden of conducting a lab report by myself, which caused me to feel stressed out and disengaged. One day in physics class, my teacher allowed me to conduct a lab with many of my friends to make the lab procedure dynamic. I found that by being with my contemporaries, I was inclined to learn more about physics, and to collect accurate and precise data. Students who create their own projects are allowed the opportunity to learn through cooperation, which betters suits them especially during summer break. Many students are already flustered by the work load they receive during the school year, furthermore projects in summer break should bring students together in learning not steer them away in frustration. We've all seen the stereotypical depiction of education in today's society. Classes upon hallways upon schools of mindless zombies who've been bombarded with unfulfilling tasks, which demoralizes their sense to learn. Why should summer projects further foster this reality into summer vacation? Isn't the point of summer break to allow students to have time to themselves? Education is a crucial institution in America, however we must not mistake it for being the only source of learning. Learning is a life skill that ascends the classrooms and school hallways, and enters the hearts of students throughout this nation. To allow students the chance to dictate their own project gives them empowerment to extend curiosity and discovery to outside the classroom. Having done project based learning in school, I can undoubtedly state that the monotonous nature of school deprives students our freedom to learn without restrictions. Of course the material must be covered, the criteria and standards must be met and the exams must be taken, but summer time is different. Summer time should be the students' time, therefore permitting student-designed projects gives students the freedom to learn unrestricted without the monotone school structure. Although some may believe otherwise, summer projects should be student-designed to produce engagement in learning, cooperation amongst students and disrupt the monotonous school-oriented learning process. Education has always been a field where curiosity, and desires to innovate have been facilitated to bring about improvement in society. We can't always judge the circumstances to which things are, without providing a valid solution as to how those things ought to improve. Summer projects is that annual cycle where this principle can be enacted in the future. Projects designed to be student oriented can reinvigorate that desire for young people to go research and explore, while shattering the illusion of what education is depicted to be in America. What better way can we allow the continuous process of learning over the summer, than by putting the keys of that exploration in the hands of the future generation?

Output: How can allowing students to design their own summer projects improve engagement in learning, promote cooperation amongst students, and disrupt the monotonous nature of education in America?


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
In a Presidential vote, does the country ask only one person about who they want for president, or the whole country? You could only imagine what only having one person's opinion could do to this country. Having people vote as a whole seems to be very beneficial to America, and may be beneficial to you as well. Sometimes it is better to have multiple people state their opinion before you make a big decision You should seek advice from multiple people because it will help make your choice easier, give you different viewpoints improve the outcome of your decision.
 This takes some stress out of your choice because then you know what the majority thinks. At the end of the day it is still your choice to make, regardless of what anyone thinks or says. There are an endless amount of decisions that people seek personal opinions on no matter how serious. When you're going out to eat with a group you ask them where they want to go. The NFL or NBA Most Valuable Player isn't chosen by just one person, it's asked about by fans, coaches, and players to see who the majority thinks deserves it. Now this does not guarantee the right choice will be made, but in the past it has proven that it has the potential to be helpful. These different viewpoints could really effect your on view on a decision. Many people make poor choices because they are biased towards what they think is right. Most likely you will not get the same opinion and view on a situation over and over again. No matter how you look at it it's beneficial. Either you receive the same view over and over and it makes your decision very clear, or you get different viewpoints and a new way to look at the situation. With the help of trustworthy and honest peers, your decision is a lot more dependable. Hearing what others believe to be true tends to help. You have to remember to ask trustworthy people, and even then your decision may not be a good one. Even some of the smartest people in America, including our president, congress, and all of the houses ask for opinions from the people. Sure a few bad choices have been made, but I strongly feel the good heavily outweigh the bad. I also believe that the good outweigh the bad on even tiny decisions made day to day when you have multiple different perspectives. You can't go wrong with other people's help on choices no matter how big or small. You should seek advice from multiple people because it will help make your choice easier, give you different viewpoints, and improve the outcome of your decision. It is truly better to ask around for help on a topic then choose on your own. The are way more benefits than downfalls. For instance, out of all the presidents we have ever had, we've had many good ones and few bad ones With different perspectives you can either add to your argument or see through another persons eyes on why they think what they think. Would you rather take the risk of making a poor choice or receive insight on what you should really do?

Output: Explain the benefits of seeking advice from multiple people before making a decision, using examples from everyday life and politics.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Have people ever wanted to know if seeking out multiple opinions or getting more advice will help them get a better answer?
Well today is that day.
 I will be doing research to see if asking for more advice and multiple opinions is better.
In my opinion I think it is. people get a more broad look at what there is it might change peoples ideas for the better, if you get more advice from people, you can see the outcomes of what they did. If people want to see what other choices they can make they can ask others.
Most of the time the person people ask will likely have chosen a differnt path than another person.
Which means that there is a higher chance of people geting multiple opinions by everyone.
People will most likely have a better choice if they ask more people for help them.
When people ask for more advice it is always better for them.
Out of 10 people that ask for more advice 9 of them will have a better outcome than the people that didnt ask for more than 1 opinion.
When I get a broad look on something I normally have a few better choices that I will make. If people are ever questioning if the choice they are going to make is bad then they should ask for advice.
Because, when people hear advice from somebody else it could change their whole perspective about the choice they were going to make.
When people hear advice or multiple opinions there is a higher percentage of them being more succesfull than others that dont ask.
Asking for more advice is always helpful because it can help people choose a better job or a better car. By seeing the outcomes of what they did people can see if the outcome is positive or negative.
If it is positive people should probably take this advice and learn form it to make better dicisions or make a good choice.
If the outcome is negative dont take this advice because it might lead people down the wrong path.
If someone find two people with two good opinions and they dont know what to choose they should choose the one that fits them the best.
If they dont find one that is good for them then they should go with what fits them the best.
When seeking multiple opinions and asking for advice to make better choices people should always make sure they find advice that fits them best.
People schould always do this just so they have a better outcome.
 These are a few resons I think asking people for more advice can help.
When asking for advice people get a more broad look at what there is, it might change peoples ideas for the better, and if you get more advice from people, you can see the outcomes of what they did.
People should always have a better outcome when they ask for advice.
There are more ideas on why asking for advice is good but the ones I stated are the best ones.

Output: Write an essay discussing the benefits of seeking multiple opinions and advice when making important decisions. Consider how hearing different perspectives can broaden one's understanding and lead to better outcomes. Use examples to illustrate your points and provide evidence to support your argument.