Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I agree because all students should do something fun and move around Most students would rather sit than play sports, so they can still do something active with the yearbook. All students should at lest do one activity rather than academics. This decision should be allowed if a student wants to do a activity or not. Would you want to participate in a extracurricular activity? I agree because students move around when playing sports Most students that play in a team could play the sports that they like. You can start feeling healthy after a game of any sport, and students can enjoy the nature when there outside. Students can help out with yearbooks, as a result they can design the front cover of the year book Lots of students like art work from the front cover and will want a yearbook Students can serve on students council which helps other students with disorders. They will be appreciated in what they are doing for others and the rest of the students will be happy. thats why I agree, so students can be active during school hours. Some students would rather sit and work with the yearbook. Some just want to help other people in the school. All academics should be for one half of school time and activity the second half. The activities would help students refresh their brains and forget the things they are going through.

Output: Explain the benefits of extracurricular activities for students and argue for the inclusion of such activities in the school curriculum. Use examples such as sports, yearbook design, and student council to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: When looking for important advice you usually have a "go to person" and then multiple people around you that you ask what to do in the problem you are having Talking with more than yourself, one other person, or five other people is an amazing thing to do because if you only talk to one person about your troubles than they may get annoyed with you or could be a fake friend When you have more conversation with people are what you are think you can see both perspectives you have more knowledge to what you are talking about lastly, improving your life skills food, drinks, pets, names, school, you name it. You can do it whenever, it is like asking someone if they like dogs or cats better, most people are quick to jump to the answer and that is bias towards the animal that they like better. When you talk to other people even that are not like you, you can see why other people like dogs or cats and their pro's to it. It's just like taking a poll in the classroom or bar graphing who is wearing a different type of shoe, but you are taking the knowledge and exporting it into your decision. So, next time talk to other people so your not bias and you get to see the positive and negative of your decision That quote is one-hundred percent true because you gain so much more brainpower when talking to others. Most adults when they are having a hard time deciding something they ask other adults, and that usually brings down the negative part. What they don't understand is when you ask a kid they can turn your idea into something brilliant that you may of never thought of. Taking to kids is even more smart idea to do when it is something fun because then you can bring their fun into your idea and make it more exciting. Next time don't just talk to people your age, talk to everyone around you. More outgoing people don't even blink at the option to go and talk to someone when shyer people need a little help, and seeking other peoples opinions during school or outside of it is a great way to get people out of their shell. Talking to someone is more then a life skill it is a everyday skill and that is why it is so greatly important. The best way to improve at it is to do it. The next time you want advise talk to more than yourself, one other person, or even five people. While you don't need to go and talk to everyone off of the street or who you walk by you don't only want your thoughts in your head. When seeking other peoples opinions you can see both points of view, have more knowledge and common knowledge, and finally have better life skills. Try it out and see how better your own opinions come, I'm sure they will come from weak one to stronger ones it a matter of days.

Output: Explain the benefits of seeking advice from multiple people when faced with a problem or decision. Use examples to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Studies show that students lose information over the summer break, if thats the case then the solution is to keeping working during the summer. some schools have summer projects to keep students from losing any information. The option for the projects are either that they are teacher-designed or student-designed I believe the required summer projects for students should be teacher-designed it allows the teacher to chose what subject they work on, if students designed it they would make it too easy, the teacher can make it fit each students level.
 some subjects in school are more important than others, like math is more important then king tut of Egypt. Students may not realize the importance of some subjects and chose a different one to do their project on. An example is when I chose my sophomore classes, I decided that choir was more important then my history class. Making that choice ended up meaning I knew less about history, I had to take the lass later on, and it kept me from seeing how crucial history is. Teachers on the other hand have a better clue as to whats more important. The teacher would know what subject is most forgotten or which subject will be best for the student to learn. That is why the summer project should be teacher-designed.
 everyone knows kids like to slack off when we can. We skip work, right fake answers, and cheat to get out of doing all the work assigned. If the subject of the project is left for the student to chose then it might not do them any good in retaiing proper information. When the student is told to find something to do a project on they would probably find a topic they recently did well in or something far beneath there skill level. An example that shows this is when I had to chose a format for my final project in my honors English class. I could chose between many different things: a regular essay, a research paper on the events of the story, or even a rap song that explains the book. I chose to write a letter as one of the characters because it didnt challenge me as much as the other choices If given the chance a student will almost always chose the easy work which is why a teacher should design the project so that the student is challenging themselves and growing. Next, "All men are not created equally" is a quote often used by teachers when telling kids not to compare themselves to others. This reinforces that a teacher should create the project because the only person who knows your academic level other then you, is your teacher. Teachers pay attention to the students and see how much help they need and where they are at in terms of their learning. In my 9th grade year I had a science project. It was the exact same project as everyone else had. My teacher realized that it would be too easy for me and I would get nothing from it so she gave me a harder one. If she had not have payed attention tome as a student she woudn't have seen where i was compared to the class . This is a perfect example as to why a teacher should create the project, so that the teacher can give the students projects at a level that is achievable for them but will also keep them on track. People might argue that the students should have their own choice as to what they create it on. The students free choice would come out during the creation of the project meaning it could be perfect for them and then they work on it in their own way I believe the required summer projects for students should be teacher-designed because it allows the teacher to chose what subject they work on, if students designed it they would make it too easy, and the teacher can make it fit each students level.

Output: Explain why the required summer projects for students should be teacher-designed rather than student-designed, taking into consideration the importance of certain subjects, the tendency for students to choose easier topics, and the teacher's ability to tailor the project to each student's level. Use examples from personal experience and research to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
In all honestly, getting rid of the Electoral College is for the best. It's unfair to the voters. Changing it to election by popular vote for the president of the United States would be easier for the people. because the candidates don't go to states they don't have a chance of winning, because of the winnner-take-all system. The candidates only focus on the tight races in the swing states. Sorce 2 also claims that in the 2000 election, 17 states didn't see the candidates at all! That's pretty rediculous. And voters in 25 of the largest media markets didn't even get to see a single campaign ad. In the Electoral College system, voters dont only vote for the president, but for electors, who also vote for the president. Then again, in source 2, the article says the the electors that were voted for can vote for anyone they choose. That's some tricky business.
 Voters can't control who the electors vote for. Electors aren't even voted for by the people. They sometimes come from state conventions, sometimes the state party's central committee, sometimes even the presidential candidates themselves. The second article says that the legislature is responsible for picking the electors. And these electors coukd always go against what the people want. Article 1 says that to Electoral college is meant to be a compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens. The Electoral College consists of the meeting of electors where they vote for President and Vice President, and the counting of electoral votes by congress. Doing away with the Electoral Cololege is the best thing to do for the people. IT's unfair and tricky. The people deserve to be respected and not cheated out of their vote by electors.

Output: Explain the advantages and disadvantages of the Electoral College system in the United States presidential elections and argue whether or not it should be replaced with a popular vote system.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
When asking for advice on any topic don't just take one persons advice. When you are asking people for there opinions, always ask more then one person peoples opinions can get mixed up in what there family and friends say, also what they read or watch. Three ways to avoid getting 100 different responses are ask a person you know is good at that topic apply it to the real world, and what not to do. If you are trying to find advice one of the best people to ask are your friends especially if they know the topic. Most of the time your friends will tell you anything you ask, but sometimes they are just saying stuff to either act smart or they actually are smart. Remember to make sure this friend never lies or tells you false information. Another group of people you can ask are your teachers, parents, grandparents, or even your uncles or aunts. All these people are older than you and have more experience in the real world. They also can probably answer any questions you ask.
Another group of people you can ask are people who have already been through the situation. Once you ask whoever is reliable to you, take the information you got and apply it to the real world In real life the ability to learn and apply what you learned is very important because if you cant apply what you learned then you will be limited on alot of different things. Math,history,english and science are all aplications to the real world. In gy you have to apply the rules and the mechanics to play any game. For example driving if you cant apply how to drive to real life then you can't drive.
 Sharing it is also important because if you share your advice you might get some back. Make sure you are the trustworthy one and never spread rumors. Make sure you are an expert in one atleast one subject. Asking someone good at that topic, applying it to the real world and sharig your knowledge are three ways to not get 100 different answers. Its not easy to give advice but sometimes you can.

Output: Explain three ways to avoid getting multiple conflicting responses when seeking advice on a topic. Provide examples of reliable sources for advice and discuss the importance of applying the advice to real-life situations. Additionally, discuss the importance of sharing knowledge and being a trustworthy source of information.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: In my ophion, technology reading students emotional expressions is the dumbest thing ever First, the apps they are using just changes the student indivaully like you can not make someone be happy on a computer you can make them look happy they should not change someone for who they want them to be vs what they are. Second, you should not change a photo or use any edits because thats changing you and you should just be you if you dont smile thats okay dont let people judge you on how you look you should impress your self not somebody eles. Third, People today need to realize that changing someone in any type of way could hurt them even worse. Yes, messing with peoples emotion or sometimes trying to figure it out whats wrong with them can set off alot of things. Instead of making someone look happy people should talk to the person that is upset, trying to be there for them maybe thats all they need or tell them soemthing postive to brighten there day. In Conclusion, I think changing someones pictures to make them look like they are happy is the wose idea ever because deep down they know they are, but do you just because someone makes and upset face dosnt always mean they are.

Output: Discuss the potential negative effects of using technology to alter or read emotional expressions in students, and argue for the importance of accepting and supporting individuals for who they are rather than trying to change them.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I feel the elctoral college is overpowered and isnt neccsary Ifeel that the Electoral college is not a place its a process. The Founding fathers established it in the constitutional as a compromise between the election pf president by vote. See the elctoral college consists of 538 elctors. A majority of 270 elctoral votes is required.
To Begin,Each canidate running for president in your state has his or her own group of electors. these electors are generally chosen by the canidate's political, but as usaul state laws vary on how elcetors sare selected and what thier responsibilities are....
See the presidential election is held every four years on the tueday after novemvber, but what people dont know when you vote for canidates you are actually voting for your canidate's elcetors.
Most feel its "winner takes-all" system that awards all electors to the winning presidental canidate; but it's states like Maine and Nebraska each have a variation of "proprtional representation." After the presidential elction, your governor prepares a "Certificate of Ascertainment"  listing all of the canidates who ran for president in your state, as well as the names of their respective electors Under the electoral college system voters not for the president, but for a slate of electors, who in turn elect the president. The electors can be anyone not holding public office. the pickers of first place depends on the state, maybe even state conventions, all these things can help inprove the voting polls and make them quicker

Output: Explain the process of the Electoral College and its role in the election of the President of the United States. Discuss the differences between the "winner takes-all" system and the "proportional representation" system used in some states. Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the Electoral College system and argue whether or not it is necessary in modern times.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The face on mars is a natural occuring phenomon that occurs over time. It may look that it is created by some kind of super natural being. Jim Gavins cheif scientist for NASA's Mars Exploration Program said " It remindes me most of Middle Butte in the Snake River plain of Idaho. That's a lava dome that takes form of an isolated mesa about the same height as teh face on Mars,". That means that the " Face on mars" is a natural occuring phenomon caused by lava. Althought not everybody beleives that the face is a natural occuring phenomon they believe that is evidence of a ancient Martian civilization. This therory is highly impossible that it is evidence of a ancient Martian civilization. But there are still people that believe it is a ancient Matian civilization, but most of the people on Eart believe and know that is a natural occuring phonomon that is caused by something natural to that planet possbly lava or maybe pressure.

Output: Explain the origin of the "Face on Mars" and the different theories surrounding it, including the belief that it is evidence of an ancient Martian civilization. Use evidence and expert opinions to support your argument that the "Face on Mars" is a natural occurring phenomenon caused by something natural to that planet, such as lava or pressure.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
In this essay I will be giving an argument on why this so called "face" is not made by aliens.
The prompt tells you that one of your colleagues says that it is created by aliens.
My job in this essay is to tell why it isn't and give an explanation.
The figure that NASA saw was a so called "face on mars".
They claimed that it was in the shape of a human head and it was thought to be made by aliens. In my oppinion this is not made by aliens. Here is a reason why.
All these years NASA has gone to a two or three planets looking for aliens.
Throughout the years how many have we found, none! Yes, we may have found some traces of aliens, but we can not prove that these are actually alien tracks, or alien lifeforms.
There is no way to prove that this structure was made by aliens, unless we have images of them, and so far we have none. Look down on earth.
How many mesas or Buttes do we have in America, or even around the world?
Now think about this, were these man made? No, none of these land formations were man made!
They are formed naturally by nature.
Now over the years we have found a lot of reasons how Mars is sort of like the earth.
It carries water, and it is one of the easiest planets to get to, so if you think about it, Mars could have the same land formations as we do!
Nature is a beautiful thing, and it more than likely made this so called "face". Yes, you may be right in some way.
Yes, we have found traces of aliens over the years.
This COULD have been made by aliens.
Maybe they are trying to connect to other life outside of their planet.
That is the only argument that you have against me. The argument that isn't even factual.
You are going off of a guess in your mind. So overall in this essay I have covered three thing.
I have covered my first argument, which is that we have not found aliens even though we have been searching all of these years.
I have covered my second argument, which is that nature has formed many structures like this on earth, it could have been formed out of the land.
And I also covered the rebuttle, which is that there is a possibility that this was built by aliens because we have found traces.
So in conclusion, this structure was not built by humans, this was land made.

Output: Write an argumentative essay explaining why the "face on Mars" is not created by aliens. Use evidence to support your claim and address potential counterarguments.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
In this article I would like to have the technology because a computer that can read all 44 major muscles, and also this is where FACS will come in (Facial Action Coding System.) It tells how a person it feeling, in my oppain I would want to know the emotions of my friend, I also would racomened this to the school consulers, only so the consuler can help that person with their emotional prabablem. Yes you can see how that person is "feeling by looking at their face,"
but some people can fake a smile to hide whats going on inside, some people are just scared to let their feeling out because they are worried someone it going to hurt them. The "funny things" about people is that laughing can be really contagest when you are down in the dirt, and your friend sees that you're just upset, they will do anything to mke you happy they will smile you, make a joke. just to see you smile But sometimes just looking at someone does not always workout as some people would like So this is way I would agree to have the technolgy to see his or hers emotions.

Output: Discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of using technology to read facial expressions and emotions, such as the Facial Action Coding System (FACS), in personal and professional settings. Consider the ethical implications of using this technology, as well as its potential impact on mental health and privacy. Provide examples of situations where this technology could be useful, and also situations where it may not be appropriate or effective.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
As you know some of the students of this school like too do community service also you know some don't enjoy doing community service. I believe that community service is good but should not be required to all students. some students even though they are required will not do the community service making it unfair for the students that do enjoy doing community service. some students may have other activities they may have to do instead of the community service such as church or maybe a family situation.
 even though they join in the task of community service they might get frustrated because they are forced to do so and could create a problem between there self and other students. some students may not be able to come and join the other students they may not have a source of transportation. I believe that community service should not be required because some students wouldn't come, another reason is some may have other activities they have to do, also how some students may make a good thing into something bad, and lastly some students may not be able to come join the activity with the other students because they have no source of transportation.

Output: Should community service be required for all students in schools? Discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of mandatory community service and argue for or against its implementation. Consider factors such as individual student preferences, scheduling conflicts, transportation limitations, and the potential impact on student relationships and attitudes towards community service.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
There is a big issue that your school has, and we would like you to fix it. The issue is our inability to take part in sports activities if we have below a B average. Many of the students including me think this is unfair to the students. B average is above average which is a C Many of your students in this school have a C which is expected of most students and is considered passing therefore the grade expectancy should be lowered to a c avrage. You may not feel that would be good enough for your students but it is the average for all schools in the country and the average grade your students in your school are getting. Another concern of yours may be that the students in the sports program may slack at school if you lower the grade level I can assure u that will not happen.
 Many of my fellow students at our school take pride in our school work and never get below a C-, I suggest if they do that they should get some source of extra studying or tutoring to be able to stay in the sports activities we offer here.
 It is a good reason also to allow C ranking students in because it keeps students busy. With out the program there would be a lot of your students getting in to trouble . Such as joining gangs and doing drugs or getting into fights Sports is a good source of virtue to students my age. Its good to have values you may acquire from sports instead of us being juvenile delinquents from bad choices you do when you have nothing better to do.

Output: Propose a solution to the issue of students with below a B average being unable to participate in sports activities at our school. Consider the impact of lowering the grade requirement to a C average and potential concerns about academic performance and student behavior. Additionally, suggest ways to support students who may struggle academically while participating in sports.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Scientists wants to keep on exploring venus even tho it is dangerous. One reason I think they should is because they should get information about things they brealy know about. My second reason is because they might find someuseful things if they keep on studing it. My last reason is because it might not be as dangerous as people make it out to be. scientist should keep studing venus. In conclusion I do think its a good idea for people to keep studing venus. My first reason was because it could give the scientist more information on the plant. My second reason was they might find some useful information that coild help them. My last reason was venus might not be a dangerous place as people make it out to be. So i think this is why some scientist should study venus more.

Output: Explain why scientists should continue to explore Venus despite its perceived dangers, citing at least three reasons to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Venus is the closest planet to us in our solar system, which means we should explore it. At least, that is what the author of "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" believes. he does not support this claim very well as he gives only one vague reason to explore it, he names several dangers and obstacles of exploring it, provides very few actual solutions.
 First of all, he does a good job of naming the several dangers and obstacles of exploring Venus such as the extreme atmosphiric pressure. The main problem though, is the temperature wich as the author states, "average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit," (Paragraph 3). This poses a problem as most metals and other materials melt at such high temperatures. However, the author fails to give very many solutions to these issues.
 The author only provides two solutions to the numerous problems that he previously stated. Those solutions were to stay above the atmosphere where it is not as hot, and to create mechanical computers that were more reinforced. These solutions would be all well and good had he not brought up a problem with the first in which he states "peering at Venus from a ship orbiting or hovering safely far above the planet can provide only little insight on ground conditions" (Paragraph 6) thus, it is not a true solution to the problem at hand. But maybe there is good reasons to keep trying to come up with new ways to explore Venus. Sadly, the author only provides one vague reason for which scientists should still try to come up with new ways to explore Venus. This reason of his is,"It may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system" (Paragraph 4). The problem with this is that it does not go very deep into why it being similar to Earth matters. A scientist at NASA might understand any signifigance in that statement, but an average person might not. For that reason it is a very weak argument. In short, The author does not support his idea for exploring Venus very well because he only gives one vague reason to explore it and he names several dangers and obstacles of exploring it while providing very few actual solutions. Had he named more solutions and reasons to explore Venus it would have supported his idea far more. He named too many dangers without ways to properly combat them, which is why the author's support for his claim was weak.

Output: Evaluate the author's argument for exploring Venus in "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" by analyzing the dangers and obstacles of exploring the planet that he presents, the solutions he proposes, and the reasons he gives for why scientists should still try to explore it. Determine whether the author effectively supports his claim and provide evidence to support your analysis.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
As a student, if I don't understand something in class, I will ask someone about it. Whether that is a teacher, a student, or a parent there is almost always someone who knows. If any one of these reliable sources does not know, I can most likely look it up on one of my devices that has the internet If we were to introduce the new FACS technology, it may have unindended lasting impacts which could be detrimental to our society. It was mentioned in the passage on paragraph 6 that " 'A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored. Then it could modiy the lesson, like an effective human instructor.' " The first reason that it could be bad for our society as a whole is that it is not the computer's duty to explain how to do everything and to change to our will. While computers were made to help us, it cannot be our only source of information. On the other hand, teachers are st school for the sole purpose of helping you learn. It is their actual job to be there to help you learn things. While computers are a tool to help achieve this goal, there are other ways to learn about things and get them explained to you.
When you are in highschool, many teachers and parents will say things to you along the lines of "In the real world" and " Highschool is preparing you for the real world". Later on in life, "in the real world", if you get bored at a job you cannot just change what you are doing. You have to continue on with it because it is your job. If we implemented this system now in schools, many kids and teens would get in their mindset that if they are bored or don't understand something, things will change for them. Kids should not rely on a computer to help them understand everything. There are teachers, classmates, parents, and other adults who can help. The second reason why this could be bad for our society is the accessibility. Not every school has computers and not every class uses them. If we were to implement this software, it could be giving an unfair advantage to the students who had acsess to it. There are still plenty of schools that may not have a computer in every classroom. Similarly, not all students and parents can afford this kind of technology. Because of how new and high-tech this software is it most likely will cost more money to be put into effect. This would cause the schools with more money to be able to get it while the schools with less funding and less money to be pushed aside and not get it. This causes the students at the schools that cannnot afford it to have a disadvantage. The third and final reason why this could be bad for our society as a whole is simply that people may become less sensitive to reading other peoples emotions. Without needing to have face- to- face human interactions to see how people are feeling, it could result in a decline of being able to recognize emotions in facial expressions.
I learned a few chords on the ukulele this summer. I could piece together a song or two. Now after a few months, I can't remember the first thing about playing those chords. This example shows that if you learn something then don't do it for an extended period of time, it will take a while to relearn how to do it. Although reading emotions is nothing like playing ukulele, the same holds true; if you learn something, and rely on something else to help you do it, it is going to be hard for you to re-learn how to do it again. People also have a right to privacy and some people may not enjoy those particular rights being breached. I am a person who does not let all of my emotions show. Other people may bottle these feelings up in hopes that nobody will see. If people want to keep in how they feel, they should be able to do that as it is what they want. Because it is not the computers duty to exlain everything to you, not everyone has accsess to this kind of software, and people may lose their sensitivity to the fine art of emotion reading, I am in opposition of implementing this FACS technology.

Output: Discuss the potential negative impacts of implementing FACS technology in classrooms on our society, including the overreliance on technology for learning, the accessibility of the technology, and the potential decline in emotional intelligence. Use specific examples and evidence to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
In the Westminister system, the head of state and or government is elected by the majority of both houses of their respective national legislature. In the popular vote system, the head of state and or government is elected by the majority of the nation. Unlike the Westminister system, the popular vote system has a vast array of ways to carryout the elections. Tyrants sway the people and if the people are sovreign we can't let them hold all the power when they can easily be misguided. For the safety of freedom against tyranny and for the safety of the people's sovreignty; the United States must ensure the continuity of the Electoral College. The united states of america is the oldest surviving republic in modern day times. This is because our founding fathers were some of the greatest thinkers in american history. the idea of the electoral college was heavily influenced by the English system of government and also the Iriqouis Confederacy though it is usually unrecognized due to the fact that many americans, at the time, thought Native Americans were savages. One of the principles of English government the founding fathers used was the idea of electing heads of the nation. in the United Kingdom the Prime Minister, i. e. the head of government, was elected by the majority of the house of commons and then approval by some higher authority to ensure the vote was valid and legitimate. Our founding fathers were afraid of a popularly elected dictator who would bring down the principles of republicanism and democratic institutions. So the Founding Fathers decided to create a system where the head of state and his office where responsible and questionable to the Federal legislature; the United States Congress. He could be impeached by congress if he had committed crimes and removed from office if he was unfit to carry out the duties he was entrusted with. The electoral college was made to ensure that despotism never happens in the United States. Adolf Hitler was never elected to any office, he was appointed to the chancellorship of Germany by President Hindenburg because Hitler held the people's trust and approval. Benito Mussolini was appointed Prime Minister of Italy by the King because he had the people on his side. This cannot happen in the United States because we have the Electoral College. the electors of the President are ordinary people that no one really knows whom they are. the electoral college is not democratic and it was not supposed to be. This is representative democracy or republicanism. According to Richard A. Posner,"...the electoral college method is not democratic in a modern sense... it is the electors who elect the president, not the people."
 Governments are flawed and some are so corrupt and abusive that their extremitites cannot be mentioned. The United States government and congress have always had the interests of the people in their mind. However, there is a rising faction of people of the united states that want to remove the electoral college, one of whom was Richard Milhouse Nixon who was the 37th president of the united states and was the only person to resign the office due to unconstitutional scandals. because the Electoral College is not democratic enough that it should be done away with. According to Bradford Plumer,"The Electoral College is unfair, outdated, and irrational." What many forget to realize is that the Electoral College is a Presidium for the elections, it presides over and gives the real vote in the elections because it comprises of random people representing both the states and the states' populations This is representation in the election process. The Electoral College is the people's representation. It was made by the Founding Fathers of the united States for a purpose. though many not approve of the Electoral College, many of our nation's greatest presidents were elected by it like John F. Kennedy, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, and Thomas Jefferson. To ensure the safety of freedom against tyranny and for the safety of the people's sovreignty; the United States must ensure the continuity of the Electoral College.

Output: Explain the differences between the Westminister system and the popular vote system in electing the head of state and government. Analyze the potential risks of a popularly elected dictator and the importance of preventing despotism in a democratic society. Evaluate the role of the Electoral College in ensuring the safety of freedom against tyranny and the people's sovereignty in the United States. Discuss the criticisms and defenses of the Electoral College and its significance in the election process.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The culture of the cars is a easier way of transportation for the people, yet do the people know that these cars are space consumers and cause smog in most areas of the world. By just reducing the amount of cars invarious locations the amount of space would increase the therefore make town or city more accessable for the large population. this change of culture may benifit the population by just having the public transportation and biking. To begin with the space comsuming in suburbs makes it hard most people make a living in the tight area and having the certian parking areas may be the only way to have the space needed to get to where they need to be, yet its all timed. this makes people more tense when they had to worry of a parking spot. The people in Germany weren't allowed to park the sides of the road and have drive ways unless they payed an extra $40,000 along with a home. As said the text Vaban, had completed a trend of separating the car use from the surburban life, this is what they called the 'smart planning'. Aslo to include that other areas of the world such as Beijing, China, has to worry more the amount of smog polluting their air and making people ill. In Paris, France, diesel fuel was blamed for the pollution because most of the cars were made up of this fuel. they were rank the most polluted area comparedto other locations. to reduce the amount of the complaints of the lack of space and pollution the want to either rid of the cars or just buy more plug-in-cars and hybrids for cleaner air. Not to mention, that in Bogota, Colombia they completely banned the cars from their country for a day to promote an alternative transportation and reduce the smog. the voilators are faced $25 fines. the stress level has dropped and therefore has madeit easier for the people to more around and not get so aggrevated. the culture of cars has been a issue for someyears and in some areas very diificult to handle therefore they have created a more effiecent way to make life easier for most people. the world has to reduce the smog and increase the space for more compact living and larger populations. By not to get rid of the culture car completly but to just reduce it can be benificial to the people and the world.

Output: Discuss the impact of reducing the number of cars in various locations on space availability and air pollution, and how it can benefit the population by promoting public transportation and biking. Use examples from different parts of the world to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Venus is a very dangerous planet and has harsh storms, earthquakes, and a bad atmosphere. But despite all that, the studying of venus is more important than worrying about the dangers that lurk there. In the article "The Challenge of
Exploring Venus" the author also supports this claim pretty well. In the article "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" the author supports the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. He explains that Venus has very harsh conditions that you couldn't live there or even land there without surviving for only a few hours. It has a thick atmosphere of almost 97 % Carbon Dioxide, there are clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere, and the planet's surface temperatures average over 800 degrees. They even say such conditions could crush a submarine or melt any metal. the author still thanks it's important that we study Venus in the future. He goes on to say " why are scientists even discussing further visits to its surface?", and then explains that astronomers are facinated by venus because it may well once have been the Earth-like planet in our solar system. The author suggests that Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life. He even states " Today, Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on Earth.
The author gose on to say, "The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters." "Furthermore, recall that Venus can sometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit, a crucial consideration given the long time frames of space travel. The value of returning to Venus seems indisputable, but what are the options for making such a mission both safe and scientifically productive?".
He begins to say that NASA has an idea for sending Humans to study Venus. It would allow scientist to float above the scorching ground and just hover in the air. studying venus is more than important than worrying about the dangers of the planet. The author states " striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavours. Out travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation". In conclusion the author supports his opinion on studying Venus is more important than worrying about dangers. He supports this opinion by stating that venus is a crazy planet but still says why we should explore. He even says Venus could've been most Earh-like planet out there, and earth still has similar features.

Output: Explain why studying Venus is important despite the dangerous conditions it presents, using evidence from "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" article.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: In the modern world, we are almost completely dependent on our technology to get us through the day.  These human creations, such as, cellular phones, the internet, computers, and cars make it easier for us to perform everyday tasks.  But for such heavy use of these items, there are side effects. Cars in particular can, and will, create lasting issues in our environment, which if not resolved will cause many problems in our future. if the First World states like the UK, France, Germany, and the U.S. were to cut down on car usage, we would see a drastic decline in not only the air polluting greenhouse gases expenses for families spending all their money at a gas pump. we would see an increase in other things, such as the amount of exercise and public people would acquire through alternative transportation. The foremost issue is of course, the environmental effects of cars.  According to the New York times, cars are on average responsible for "12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe . . . and up to 50 percent in some car-intensive areas".  These emissions can often make cities uninhabitable.  In places such as Shanghai, Hong Kong, and other urban centers; heavy pollution requires citizens to wear gas masks, and acid rain devstates plant life.  This heavy pollution has such an effect that it causes black snow in Russia, thousands of miles away.  But the scale of the problem is much larger than acid rains and black snow; our planet is heating up, and greenhouse gases are to blame.  If you want evidence just look at our neighbor, Venus.  Roughly the size of Earth, scientists believe that Venus once has water, but look at it today, and you will see our solar system's hottest planet.  Several million years ago Venus was overcome by volcanic activity; of much greater extent than anything ever seen on Earth since it's formation in pre-cambrian time.  These volcanos spewed thousands of tons of carbon monoxide into the atmosphere, and thus began the greenhouse effect.  The sun's rays would pierce through the smog and reflect off of the surface of the planet, but when they went back up the smog stopped them and turned them away, back down towards the planet's surface.  This caused the planet to practically absorb all of the energy and heat of the sun.  Before long the surface temperature became hot enough to melt lead, making Venus utterly uninhabitable.  If nothing is done to stop atmospheric pollution, this is our future. But in our modern world many people would be completely lost without a car, it has become the staple of our infastructure, not unlike the horse from years past. But there is evidence in the small town of Vauban, Germany; that life without cars is a very possible thing.  The small community of Vauban has forbidden cars within their town, and the results are suprisingly positive.  Of the residents of Vauban, seventy percent do not own cars, and are very happy with their circumstances.  As Heidrun Walter said to the New York Times, "When I had a car I was always tense.  I'm much happier this way."  While other states might not have such successful car free zone's, Colombia has an annual car-free day in their capital of Bogota and surrounding cities.  This day often has millions of Colombians biking, and walking from place to place.  There has also been an improvement in city beautification according to an article by the Seattle Times, "Parks and sports centers also have bloomed throughout the city; uneven pitted sidewalks have been replaced by broad, smooth sidewalks . . . and new restaurants and upscale shopping districts have cropped up."  Not only does the restriction of cars help the environment, it can also help the economy. The average American citizen's budget consists mainly of two things, housing, and vehicles.  But during the recession of 2008, there was a decline of about nine percent in average miles driven.  The burden of gas prices and car payments became too much for many unemployed Americans.  But after the recession passed, the decline continued, and may soon accelerate.  The New York Time states that "Demographic shifts in the driving population suggest that the trend may accelerate.  There has been a large drop in the percentage of 16- to 39-year-olds getting a license, while older people are likely to retain their licenses as they age".  If this trend continues, then we have already taken the first step in curbing our greenhouse gas emissions; and by doing so, we may increase the living standards of our citizens who would have more money.  As well as repurposed government funding in other cleaner and faster forms of transportation due to a lesser need in road construction and maintainance. Finally, the world we live in today is changing, and with always increasing technology, it may not be long before a clean alternative to gas burning vehicles arises.  But you cannot count on the unknown; and what is known is that should we continue on our current path, the world will be a very hot place by 2040.  Either we must change, or our cars will die with us.

Output: Discuss the environmental and economic impacts of reducing car usage in First World countries such as the UK, France, Germany, and the U.S. and explore alternative transportation options.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I believe that "Driverless Cars" are the next big thing to this world. Millions of people use cars today and have a chance of injury or worse. If a car could drive itself or be more alert of things around it, the problem of crashing wouldn't be there anymore. The beginning of driverless cars is already here so why be against something that has already made the world a safer place As it says in paragraph seven that they can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves without any human touch.
The reason I am not against driverless cars is that a person close to me was saved from a car crash with a automatic brake system. If that person was to have moved alittle more without the brake system they wouldnt be here today. Another reason is if a car could drive itself there would be more time to get stuff done on the way to your destination If your a busy worker or a kid with homework due, then during that time you could get things done. On the other end of the argument, we haven't come that far to make a driverless car. Sometimes machines mess up and cause problems and that could happen to this. There should be a button or something like that to switch a driverless car back to a normal car. We just dont have enough technology to do a driverless car and to make one now would be dangerous. But in the future these cars could make things alot better for the world. Car crashes wouldnt happen and the pollution from cars would be alot less because of how much gas they take. They will make the world cleaner and get you to your destination faster. In my life time I hope to see a driverless car and get to be in one. People that are not aloud to drive like the elderly or teens without a license could go anywhere without any danger.
The idea of a driverless car is just amazing and I know im not the only one that would love to see one. In the future normal cars should be tossed and recycled to be made into new driverless cars. I would feel a lot safer being behind a car that knows everything then being behind my two hands.

Output: Discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of driverless cars. Consider factors such as safety, efficiency, convenience, and environmental impact. Provide examples and evidence to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: "Thank god I got to talk to mom, dads advice was horrible." Generic_Name said, as he finally learned how to tie his shoe. This is just one of many instances of how getting more than one person to help you with something is beneficial. Some people think that more than one opinion can be confusing or make people over think but in the end it helps you more than it hurts you. 2nd or 3rd opinions can make you look at things from a different point of view, it can also make people reflect on a bad decision finally it can make someone better at giving advice. Therefore multiple opinions are great and can really help you grow as a person. It could make you change your mind or even make you see something from a way you never could've imagined. For Example, lets say you wanted to go out late with your friends to watch a movie and your dad says yes, but then you run it by your mom and she reminds that even though it's a Friday night you have a game tomorrow. So you take into account what your mom says and you stay home. The next day you score 3 goals and one of those goals were the game winning goal. Now what if you had listened to your dad who had disregarded the fact that you had game and complete forgot. But thankfully, you listened to your mom who reminded you that you had a game although you completely forgot. This ties back to the fact that 2nd opinions make you look at things from a different point of view. You could've easily just gone to the movies with out remembering that you had a game. But because you asked your mom she reminded you that you had a game and saved you from trouble in the next morning. Another example is, when people are hurt or sick and they go to the doctor sometimes that first, second or even third doctor dont know whats going on but if you choose to accept your fate you'll truly never know whats going on. Now imagine that you went to that 5th doctor and he helps you realize that that head ache wasn't from working out. It was from lack of sleep. Now your on the right medication and living your best life. All because you kept asking you now have headache free days this ties back to the fact that second or 3rd opinions can make you look at things from a different point of view if he had just quit he would still have that headache but the 5th doctor made him realize that the headache wasn't from working out it was from lack of sleep. If you make the wrong decision even after you get advice from multiple people maybe you won't need there advice at all next time. For example, if you had forgot to do homework even though your teacher had reminded you to do it but your friends told you to play video games with them instead and now you have an F in the class maybe next time you'll go with your gut instead and just do the homework. This ties back to the fact that multiple opinions can help you reflect on bad decisions because now you know that school comes first and you won't need to ask anyone when it comes to that. Another example is what if you want to go out with your friends but you know if you go out this weekend you cant go out next weekend so you ask your first friend and he tells you to just go out but then you ask your other friend and he reminds you that theres a big party next week. You end up listening to your first friend and miss the big party next week all because you were inpatient. Now next time I bet you wont miss the party. If you here different perspectives from multiple people it will help you be more wise and maybe next time you will be able to help out other people. For example,imagine your brother asks you for advice on how to make the baseball team and you remember that multiple coaches told you the most important thing was to always hustle so than you tell your brother that and he make the team. This reflects on the fact that multiple opinions can make you more wise because if he hadn't known about that who knows maybe his brother doesn't make the team. Another example is, imagine you friend is nervous before a test but you remember the advice all the teachers gave you. You give him the advice and he gets an 100% on the test. Without your advice he would've failed. Therefore multiple opinions will grow your wisdom and that will help others as well. In the end multiple opinions are a key factor on everyday success, like said in the story it helps you look at things from a different point of view, it can also make people reflect on a bad decision and finally it can make someone better at giving advice. Therefore it helps you more than it hurts you so you should get multiple opinions in life you never know how it could benefit you.

Output: Explain the benefits of seeking multiple opinions when making decisions, using personal anecdotes and examples to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I think that you should choose Policy 1 because a lot of parents text their children either when they will be picked up or if they are going to be late. Also if you don't have phones at school and a parents tells the student that they will be here at three but they were late, then the student would be waiting outside for a long time until his/her mom or dad came to pick them up. In addition, if a student is really sick and needs to go home, they can call their mom or dad on their cell phone. For example, I got sick in school once and I felt so bad, so I went to my locker and called my mom and asked her to pick me up from school. Another reason why we should have Policy 1 is that if you get sick and have to use the school phone to contact your parent, then you would have to remember your mom's or dad's number, and if you didn't then you can't go home and you have to toughen out the rest of the day. In addition, if you can have your cell phone in school then you can communicate to your family if something has happened to someone or you forgot something. Also if you forget something at home, then you can use your phone to see if your mom or dad would go back and get it for you. In addition, when the school has a jeans day, but you forget you can call your mom or dad to get your some casual clothes for you If you enforce the rule more and give out detentions and take away the phones if the student is using it in class then maybe some of the students would pay more attention to the rule and not use their phone during class. That is why I think that you should use Policy 1.

Output: Write an essay arguing for the implementation of Policy 1, which allows students to have cell phones in school. Use personal experiences and examples to support your argument, and address potential concerns such as distraction in the classroom. Discuss the benefits of allowing students to have cell phones, including the ability to communicate with parents and access important information. Finally, propose potential solutions for enforcing the rule and minimizing distractions during class time.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Why should you join the Seagoing Cowboys program? The Seagoing Cowboys program was hired to take care of horses, young cows, and mules that were shipped overseas after World War II. The Seagoing Cowboys were hired by the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration, or the UNNRRA. This administration helps countries recover their food supplies, animals, and more. The UNNRRA was put together to help people. You should help these people, too. Join the Seagoing Cowboys. If you like going on adventurous trips, this is the job for you! You get to take care of horses, ride on a boat, and feed the horses as well. You also get to see many place like Europe, China, and Italy. Excavate castles in Crete, and marvel at the Panama Canal on your way to China. Sail across the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. Also, you get to do remarkable activities on the ship such as volleyball, baseball, fencing, boxing, reading, whittling, and have table-tennis tournament! Being on the sparkling, light-blue seas will be loads of fun! You'll be absolutely altruistic by helping other people and animals! Becoming part of the Seagoing Cowboys program will change your life. Take care of precious horses, see astonishing sights, and play wonderous games! Joing this program could open up the world to you. It'll make you more aware of people, other countries, and their needs. You'll be exuberant when you join. Have fun on the high seas!

Output: Write an essay on the benefits of joining the Seagoing Cowboys program, including the history of the program, the responsibilities of the cowboys, and the opportunities for adventure and personal growth.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Everyday people die in car accidents because they use cell phones while driving. According to research cell phones are leading factors that cause accidents. Studies show that a cell phone put drivers at a four-time greater risk of a crush. Despite of a danger, people still use cell phones because they want to be always available and keep in touch with other people. Also, they think that hand-free set is safe because they can drive using two hands. Moreover, they use arguments that cell phones are necessary in emergency situations Although some people support using cell phones while driving, there are evidences that they are dangerous, and people should avoid talking while driving. Opponents whose work depends on a cell phone like lawyers or businessmen say that they always must be available to answer the phone to keep their business running. However, because of their habits, they can create dangerous and hazardous situations like a collision or an accident Business issues can be stressful and dangerous while driving because it can cause emotional reactions that can lead to tragedy. Because of the conversation they might get upset and this can lower their driving ability that can lead to lose control over the car. So if people don't make a decision to put away their cell phones their routine can harm innocent people. Opponents say that hands-free set is safety because people can drive using two hands. However, hands-free devices don't eliminate the risk of causing an accident and even may it worsen by suggesting that the behavior is safe. Researches show that using headset can be as dangerous as holding a phone because the conversations distracts drivers from focusing on the road. Scientists had proven that people talking over the phone image person who they talking to and that doesn't interfere with driving. The problem is when a car swerves unexpectedly or pedestrian step into traffic, and the mind lacks the processing power to react in time. So, the problem isn't in holding the wheel and cell phone at the same time what may cause an accident because of lack man oeuvre, it is because of conversation and lack of reaction at the particularly time.
 Opponents say that cell phones are good because they give an opportunity to make a call in case of emergency However, it is illusion of safety because when people need it the most either they can't find it or reach it because they are stuck in car. People shouldn't fully depend on cell phones because they are not reliable, and the trusty solution for the difficult situation is OnStar. OnStar is a service that in case of accident or an emergency will contact you. If you are not able to answer, they will contact police department, hospital and fire service giving them your exact GPS location. Therefore, nowadays cell phones are unnecessary devices because they are unreliable in emergency situations while On Star is always prepared to help you in an accident. Concluding, if people don't give up cell-phones the number of fatalities on the roads will still increase. It is people responsibility to not incur their own and others people lives.

Output: What are the dangers of using cell phones while driving and how can they be avoided?


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I don't believe the students would benefit from being able to attend classes from home. First of all, the research showing there is a lot of chance to know about the distance. It's hard to make the online or video to offer the distance. Because when the students are in online or when they try to make video they are not going to take care them self. For example: I remember when I was six grade my friend PROPER_NAME was making online video. We went to classes from home to know how far it is. On that time she just focus on her video she wasn't focus on her way. After that, she try to cross the way but she still making video. She didn't saw the car she try to cross the road. So,she got some accident because of the video and she just focusing what she is doing. The most important way is to offer the distance classes from home is using map. It's easy to know how far or how close it is. Other ways, the students have to take care there self when they are in the way because there is a lot of car. For example: when I was tine grade I remember my friend PROPER_NAME she was eleven grade.
She try to offer the distance for her friend by making video. When She was school from home. Then, she started showing the way. On that time, she wasn't take care her self because she was focusing the video.
Next, she try to cross the way by raining. She didn't pay attention the way and she got car accident. On that time she passed away she died. I agree some students think they would benefits from being able to attend classes from home. But most of them are not going to take care them self because there are not focusing the way. They just focusing what there are doing or they just focusing online or video. In conclusion, I don't believe the students would benefits by way of online or video to offer the distance. There is other way to offer the distance from classes to home.

Output: Discuss the potential risks and drawbacks of offering distance classes from home, including the possibility of students not being able to focus on their surroundings and potentially putting themselves in danger. Use personal anecdotes and research to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The limiting of cars in our community can help us reduce pollution save money improve health. the amount of pollution caused by cars has dramatically effected the enviroment. Acording to the text the capital of France in only five days of car smog. The amount of smog riveled to the smog capital of the world Beijing, China. That was only five days of car smog. If we keep this up, the  first the sky will turn black and then it will fall and world will end! Hopefully nobody wants the world to end because of smog. To reduce the amount of smog and pollution caused by cars we can all reduce the usege of our cars. the limiting of cars can significantly reduce pollution. limiting cars can help us all save money. To illustrate, we all like that "Cash Money". And all cars need gas to work, and the funny thing about gas is it cost money; alot of money actually. So if the limited useage of cars happen then, is we save that "Cash Money". As you can see the reduction and limiting of cars can save us that "Cash Money" the limit of car useage can and will improve health by making people walk. You see people every where are getting over weight. So by makeing them walk or use other modes of transportation we can lose weight and improve health. Thus, the limiting the useage of cars can and will increase health. the limiting of cars in our community can help us significantly reduce pollution, save money, and improve health.

Output: Explain how limiting the use of cars in a community can help reduce pollution, save money, and improve health. Use examples and evidence to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I profoundly believe that the United States should not keep the Electoral College the person who has the popular vote may not win presidency, the "winner take all" system causes voters in certain states to not feel like they are creating an impact The electoral college is a process that the founding fathers established in the constition. The electoral college consits of 538 electors and a majority of 278 votes. In our voting system even if a candidate receives more votes than their opponents he or she still could lose the election because of the electoral college Here is a prime example, in the 2000 election Al Gore won the popular vote but because he had less electoral votes than Bush he unfourtunetly lost the election. According to Bradford Plumer "over 60% of voters would prefer a direct election to the kind we have now." It seems rather logical that if somebody gains the most votes in an election that the country would prefer that canidate to be the president. For that reason alone the reader should side with the idea to abolish the electoral college. Now besides somebody receiving more or less electoral votes, perhaps the candidates tied. In this case it gets thrown to the House Of Representitives which will cause a Wyoming Rep. with 500,000 voters to have just as much say as a California Rep. with 35,000,000 voters. All a tie would do is corrupt the voting system even more than it is. For those reasons there should be an indefinite ban on the electoral college. Additionally the winner take all method in some states makes voters feel unimportant. Some may argue that no region has enough electoral votes to elect a president but regions do have the power to swing an election in an enourmous way. An effect of the winner take all system is candidates not going to certain states if they know they can not win it. This can basically stop some voters from wasting time and voting because they may feel there personal vote would make no difference. In the 2000 election "17 states did not see candidates at all." according to Bradford Plumer. How could somebody possibly feel engaged in an election if whoever is running finds there vote unimportantant to them winning the election. In conclusion it is official that the electoral collage is unfair, out dated, and irrational. With that being said we should abolish it because it stops the voter who has the majority of votes from winning, and can undoubtably make voters feel unimportant.

Output: Explain the flaws in the Electoral College system and argue for its abolition in favor of a direct popular vote for the presidency.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Many today are so concerned with driving safely. There are so many things that could go wrong while behind the wheel. But can having a machine drive you around that you have little control over be less hazardous? No doubt cars that have an automatic driving system will be less work to do on our part but is that really safe? Well, what is teh definition of being safe? Safe is what you feel when you are out of harms way. When you feel as though nothing can hurt you. Like there is absolutley anything that could even slightly put you inthe way of harm. But if your driving in general, do you think you are safe? No because anything could happen. So what makes you think that "driving" a self-automated car would make you feel much more safe? Would you not feel as if you are purposely putting yourself in the way of harm? As many say we can not change the roads but we can change the cars and make them smarter, hence the name smart cars. These cars come with many sensors within and outside of the car, including a sensor on the roof. Not only are there sensors but there is also a camera near the rearview mirror. All of the technology put into the making of this car is sure to make you want to but it. Not only that but haveing the latest technology like this in your car will also make you feel safe. There are also laser beams that update a 3-D model of the car and what it is surrounded by As much as there are many sensors in these cars to make it safe there are still some things that can go wrong. what if some of the sensors begin to malfunction This can cause an accident in the case that you are not even aware that some or one of your cars sensors have stopped functioning correctly or just all together stopped working. who's fault will it be if some fancy technology in our smart cars malfunction and its begins to cause accidents? As much as we may feel safe, there is always a chance that something is not right.
 Smart cars are created to steer, speed up and even brake with no help from a human. So does this car require any human assistance? Yes, but only when trying to get through construction areas and other accidents that may have occured How will someone know when to take over? Well, the car can make the drivers seat vibrate, there willtouch sensors that will make sure that the driver stays focused even if they may not really be driving.
 With this information we may ask ourselves: "Are smart cars really safe?" The answer is opinion based and we all decide for ourselves. We are all given the choice to put our lives in the path of death and we are all given the choice to remove any injurous obstacles from our paths. No one can make the decision for you. Before "driving" one of these "smart cars" many should look at the pros and the cons and do much research to determine wheather he or she believes that tehse cars are safe.

Output: Discuss the safety concerns surrounding self-automated cars and the use of advanced technology, such as sensors and cameras, in their design. Consider the potential risks and benefits of using these cars, including the possibility of malfunctions and accidents. Evaluate the role of human assistance in operating these cars and the importance of driver awareness and responsibility. Finally, provide your own opinion on whether or not smart cars are a safe option for transportation.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: In the article "Driverless Cars Are Coming," the author presents both the positive and the negative aspects of driverless cars. Therefore, the author never takes a side on the matter. This response will side with the argument of being against driverless cars driverless cars promote less disciplined actions with not only adults but with teen drivers. automated cars would not benefit the economy, it would damage it even further automated cars put safety features at risk compared to having an abled-human to do the driving functions manually. Driverless cars can promote less disciplined actions among teen and adult drivers This assumption is made because, driving under the influence, as well as underage drinking are huge topics of discussion in today's society. Driverless cars would give these two groups of people an exscuse to commit these actions. They would no longer have to worry about the reproccutions of such crimes. Such as putting other's lives in danger or getting caught by the police. Automated cars would not benefit the economy in any way. In fact, the cars could worsen the already bad financial situation America faces now. This is because of the following quote from the article. "Originally, many futurists believed the key to developing self-driving cars someday wasn't so much smarter cars as smarter roads." "These smart-road systems worked suprisingly well, but they required massive upgrades to existing roads, something that was simply too expensive to be practical." These direct quotes further express to society that these automated cars require very new, very expensive roads. driverless cars put saftey features at risk compared to having an able-bodied human to do the functions instead "Most driving laws focus on kepping drivers, passnegers, and pedestrians safe, and lawmakers know that safety is best achieved with alert drivers." This quote speaks entirely for itself. the best option for society is to not have driverless cars because, they promote less disciplined actions with teen and adult drivers, they would not benefit the economy, and finally these driverless cars put safety features at risk compared to having an able-bodied human to do the manual functions when presented them.

Output: Discuss the positive and negative aspects of driverless cars, taking a stance against their implementation. Use evidence from the article "Driverless Cars Are Coming" to support your argument, including the potential for driverless cars to promote less disciplined actions among teen and adult drivers, their negative impact on the economy, and the safety risks associated with relying solely on automated systems.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Losing the privilege to drive can be upsetting, all the work that's put in just to get the privilege to drive. Driving is a privilege that we earn and lose, this essay discusses the ways to lose and keep the privilege to drive. There are multiple ways to lose the privilege of driving but one way is by using a electronic device while behind the wheel. Most people believe that drivers should not be able to use cell phones,texting,etc. while operating a vehicle.
 Driving while talking on the phone can get others and the driver hurt . One example could be hydroplaning. Hydroplaning is caused by traction and sliding on a film of water. Using one hand for driving and the other hand for the phone while it's raining is a creation of an accident and getting the privilege to drive taken away. Your driving privileges would be taken away because the driver has a phone in their hand and it's not allowed to have a phone in the vision of the driver behind the wheel. Another example would be of course texting and driving because once again there is a phone in the hand of the driver instead of both hands on the wheel and no one paying attention to the road. This could lead to an accident because many drivers don't know where they're going and the car could lose control. Driving with a device in your hand is a distraction because your attention should be focusing on your surroundings and the vehicles on the road. To keep from getting hurt and jeopardizing your life and the life of others,drivers should follow the Hands Free Law. The Hands Free Law is a proposed driving law that states that a driver shall not "record or broadcast a video" on any mobile phones, iPads, computers or touching any part of their bodies while operating a vehicle. Even with the Hands Free technology, drivers are not allowed to write, read, or send any messages or emails, but voice to text is allowed. Voice to text is a form of speech synthesis that converts text into spoken voice output or when the speaker can speak into their device and it translates their words into a text so that the speaker is able to answer the text message or any other important subject. Driving is a privilege. Responsible drivers should always pay attention to the road and other drivers. Cell phones should always be out of the drivers hand so they may maneuver the steering wheel and not drive reckless. Drivers need to remember that driving is a privilege and that it can easily be taken away from you.

Output: Discuss the ways in which drivers can lose and maintain their privilege to drive, with a focus on the use of electronic devices while operating a vehicle. Analyze the potential dangers of using cell phones, texting, and other electronic devices while driving, and examine the Hands Free Law as a potential solution to this issue. Evaluate the importance of responsible driving and the consequences of reckless behavior behind the wheel.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Cars have made an impression in human history. They have been used to get from point A to B for decades. They may help us but they also can hurt us. Gas emissions are hurting the environment and smog continues to grow. Some governments have already implimented ways to reduce these emissions. These have helped the problem and it may even be to our advantage. Many cities have already sought out ways to benefit the people that have chosen npt to use their cars. This limiting of car usage has benefited many countries and the trend seems to be catching on. In the first source, Elisabeth Rosenthal writes that it has made peope even happier than if they had had a car It has also helped reduce traffic in normally busy streets. The most obvious benefit and advantage to having limited car usage is the fact that the reduced car use has reduced gas emissions. Limiting car usage can be beneficial to the environment and it can also be beneficial to you. It can make for less stressed people. In Source 1, it describes how in a small town in Germany, many people are getting along fine without motor vehicles. As a matter of fact, some even said that they were happier without a car. Heidrun Walter states that "When I had a car i was always tense. I'm much happier this way." It may be less stressful because the goverment there had designed that town so that everything they could need was within walking distance or could be reched with public transportation. Many cities have already adopted this idea including New York. Source 3 has also asked people of their opinion and businessman Carlos Arturo Plaza said "It's a great opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution." Carlos had said this while riding a two-seated bicycle with his wife. Walking, Hiking, and even bicycling have been generally seen as a way to destress and relax your tensions. Stepping away from the car and just walking may just be the stress reliever you needed. A usual sight to see in busy cities and on main streets is the amount of cars that jam the street alway the way up during certain hours of the day. This can become increasingly annoying to some people that can be on their way to school or job. A car-free day has had a very succesul turn out in Bogota, Colombia. Source number 3 described the streets of the capital of Colombia to be "Eerily devoid of traffic jams." on that day. So many people might have participated because violators would be fined $25. This car-free day was intentionally placed to promote alternative transportations such as biking or public buses and to also reduce smog. Another example of a type of car limiting was seen in Paris, France. Paris was near a record amount of smog in the air with "147 micrograms of particulate matter (PM) per cubic meter compared with 114 in Brussels and 79.7 in London." - Source 2. Paris took action to try and reduce smog with this simple method: Leave cars with even-numbered license plates at home or face a $31 fine. They proceeded on to the next day with the same concept but this time instead of even-numbered plates, it was odd-numbered plates. This reduced congestion by 60 percent in the capital of France. One of the more obvious advantages of limiting car usage is the amount of emission that can be prevented from not using your car. In Source 2 it is stated that after 5 days of limiting car usage "the smog cleared enough Monday for the ruling French party to rescing the ban for odd-numbered plates on Tuesday." After just five days of the imposed fines, gas emissions into the atmosphere was reduced significantly enough to lift the ban. If five days made such an impact it can also make a huge impact if many more people were to start limiting their car usage. Car usage has already been falling in the United States. In source 4 it states that "New York's new bike sharing program and its skyrocketing brdge and tunnel tolls reflect those new priorites, as do a proliferation of car-sharing programs across the nation." This is talking about how all these factors have come to reduce car sales and car usage in general. Less cars equals less gas which would then equal less air pollution. there are many advantages to limiting your car usages. You may not only be helping the environment but you may also be helping yourself. Using your car less may even make you a less stressed individual. It has been shown to reduce congestions in busy streets. It has also helped reduce gas emission. Limited car usage has started a trend in many countries and may even be a trend here. It can give us these advantages and many more.

Output: Discuss the advantages of limiting car usage, including its impact on the environment, reduction of traffic congestion, and potential benefits for individuals. Use examples from various countries and sources to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I belive my claim for or against the value of using this technology to read students emotional expressions are invading our private space What i'm trying to say is what if they computer says the wrong things or if we feel something that could be embarrasing or offended it'll cause us to either become more emotional or angry/offended. I believe you will also be taking jobs of those who have went to college to major in this type of senarios If you are taking all of this for people to have it on a computer software then you are no better than hispanics or immagrants taking people jobs because it'll lessen the chance of people even knowing or wanting to become in their life. we need to advance technology to better help people people still have their rights and beliefs and you would be crossing the line in my opinion if you were to believe this idea. I say let the professionals handle it who are in some ways the same way cause the computers would be screening us humans when there are other professional humans to relate or more capable of helping someone than a software and if the system goes wrong then what will you guys do then? What i'm trying to say is just let people who can relate and have diplomas for this kind of stuff let them do their jobs stop replacing humans with machines

Output: Discuss the potential invasion of privacy and job displacement concerns associated with using technology to read students' emotional expressions in educational settings.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: We have to do our best to make it correctly. We have to follow the rules. We have to know how to make something, before we help them. If we all helping other community, they all going to help us too If we helping a community, it's very important, if we don't help them they don't know who help them. They don't what going on to us. they don't what happened to us. If we help them, next time they going to us back. If we don't help any community, then how other know we help them then. We can help them, we have to talk to them, we have to teach them how to help other people We have to tell them, you have to help other community next time. In my country, when other person help you, next time you have to help them back too. We love to help another community We need to help other community, we don't care if they going to help us or not. If we help them first then they know who help them. Next time they going help us back too. We have to help them first. In United states, they don't need for help. they know how to do something, they know to make something nice and strong before they can help other community. They just help other community. who is the poor family, They give food, they give rice, and they give all of stuff they have. They love to help other community

Output: Explain the importance of helping other communities and the benefits that come with it. Discuss the role of following rules and knowing how to make something before helping others. Use examples from your own country and the United States to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Do you remember a time you hated cleaning you house?
Well if people hate doing that imagine them doing community service and how that don't have air conditioning like a house do its outside in the hot sunny day and just have water to drink sweet coming down your face. some people complain of what they have and what they don't have, how hard it is to keep on cleaning everyday of their life. the best thing to have is a beautiful place to live but we wont have that if we don't keep our self together and keep our environment clean because if we don't then we would be living in a nasty ugly place then a nice and beautiful one like North Carolina how sweet and beautiful the air is But some people are to selfish to give up a little bet of their time to help and keep our community safe and clean for each another i mean how hard is it. Why would they rather live in a nasty dirty place? we should all in school accepted to work together and do community service and change mother earth and livings around us. i think we should do community service don't you?

Output: Describe a time when you found cleaning to be a difficult and unpleasant task. Reflect on the importance of maintaining a clean environment and the impact it has on our community. Discuss the benefits of participating in community service and how it can positively affect both the environment and the individuals involved.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Driverless cars are coming, no matter how much you may like it. They have their many pros and cons, they still need to be driven by a human to get in and out of a driveway, or to navigate a crash or roadblock, and how it went over 500,000 miles without crashing (paragraph two). This still fairly remarkably, even whilst it is still in it's prototype stage. Although still proving to be an expensive alternative to normal cars, driverless cars can have the potential to be an incredibly safe method of transportation, as compared to human driven cars. They can be proven even safer to both pedestrians and policeman alike, by being utilized by people under the influence of alcohol, to drive home safley, and not harm any people utilizing the sidewalk or other drivers. Although having to be driven by humans to do things like drive into driveways or navigate traffic, which would ultimatley void my previous statement on how it could protect passersby. Remember that these cars are still in the prototype stage of their lives, and developers are still working hard on making these cars as skilled as a driver as any human. These cars are coming closer and closer to becoming a reality that could be in every house by 2020. Much like everything else, they have their pros, and cons, but ultimatley prove that ve are one step closer to a better, safer tomorrow.

Output: Discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of driverless cars as a method of transportation, including their safety features and limitations, as well as their current status as a prototype technology.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
The future. Everyone wonders what it will look like, what it will be like but that is up to our future generations . The young people today will eventually be our future. They will be the ones we look up to for solutions and ideas. By having extracurricular activities be a must in schools we are only making school systems better and by making school systems better we are making our future better. There are so many fun yet different extracurricular activities for everyone such as dance, student council or debate. Schools should make participating in an extracurricular activity mandatory for students  it will give the students a chance to explore their passions, it will provide them an opportunity to make life-long friends it will benefit the schools participating.
 By providing students the chance to participate in extracurricular activities, you are letting them get a head-start in life. By trying out different activities, they will be able to determine which one they like the most and want to pursue as a career. Many students in high school still don't know what career path they want to pursue, but students who had to do an extracurricular will already know which one they prefer to others. Thus, they won't be puzzled by the time they have to choose a career. Additionally, participating in extracurricular activities will help strengthen their resume when they need it. A student who has done multiple extracurricular activities will be preferred to another student who has not done any. Furthermore, my sister, Generic_Name, never knew what career she wanted to pursue until she took a building class as an extracurricular in 9th grade. She instantly fell in love with it and could use that extracurricular class as a bonus on her resume. She is now in her first year at Yale, studying engineering. This shows why extracurricular activities will help students discover their passion. Every year, many new kids will move to the area and come to a new school so providing an additional way to get to know others is needed. The new kid will be able to connect with others that share similar interests and it will make the whole moving process much easier. In addition, having a friend that shares the same interests as you will make your bond much stronger and make you much better friends. This program will also benefit shy kids or students who are more quiet and reserved. It will help them because in school they might be more quiet if they don't feel comfortable or if none of the subjects interest them. However, if they are in an environment where they enjoy what they are doing and are with people like them they will be more likely to branch out. When I was nine, my school required I do a sport. Thus, I decided to do swim team. When I started the sport I was new to town. We had just moved from California to Virginia so I did not have many friends. However, I made many friends quite easily because of swim team. I made friends faster than usual since we shared similar interests. We all liked swimming and we would all have friendly competitions. We even took trips together which made our bond even stronger. We helped each other through hard times. Even though, two of my friends from swim team switched schools I am still very close friends with all of them. The bond we created will last a life time. It will keep students busy and occupied; thus, they won't get into trouble as much. I was once told that if you are bored, it can often lead to trouble because if you're busy you have no time to make trouble.
Also, by having students do extracurricular activities it will seem as if the school gives off lots of well rounded students who have many skills. This will seem very impressive. Lastly, the school's students will most likely have a higher grade point average (GPA) and better scores in general compared to schools who don't require extracurricular activities. This is because studies show that students who do extracurricular activities such as sports or clubs have done better in academics and will learn time management and balance better than other kids. This is why enforcing extracurricular activities will improve schools. schools should adopt a new policy of having students preform at least one extracurricular activity. This is a great way to help students find their passion, make new friends and better the schools. Students will be to find an extracurricular that sparks interest for them and hopefully it will turn out to be their career. They will also be able to make strong friendships through this program. It will also ease the anxiety of making friends for new kids. Lastly, the program will benefit schools by making their students more well rounded, increasing the overall GPA of their students and help keep students occupied and out of trouble after school. In fact, all schools in America should decide to make this a requirement. Not only will it make our school systems better but it will also improve our students; which are our future. The students in our schools today will eventually become leaders, officials, activists, doctors, lawyers, actors and politicians. So if this program will better schools and the lives that hold our future then there should be no question about implementing it.

Output: How can schools improve their systems and benefit their students by making extracurricular activities mandatory?


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: the autor suggestds that we should explore venus, personally i think it not a good idea but the author really does not support it and gives great examples to why we shouldt go out a study this beautifle planet called venus. on paragraph 3 the author really gives us great exam-les of the problems of exploring this planet one great exaple that i think will convince people from not going is that the authomosphere of venus is really thick and it is 97 percent carbon dioxcide which is bad for us , and also the temprature on average is 800 degrees which is pretty hot. As i saw read this part i noticed that the author isnt really against studiyng this planet he supports it. On paragrapgh 4 he tells us that venus is simaller to earth becasue they have terrains just like ours, valleys,mountains ,and craters. The author also shares with us and writes that Nasa's possible solution to exploring or studying this amazing planet without having to touch the surface is float above the fray use an aircraft that is like blimp. This will only help them see the surface but they wont be able to collect rocks or soil which will be harder for them One way Nasa is already working to be able to collect rocks is by using the computer used during World War 1 called mechanical computers. they can make calculation by usinf levers and gears. that way when they are up ther and send robots these can last longer and take data in, casue the modern computer tend to be fragile to heat. And in venus there is alot of heat. i believ the author really gave good details to why it is a good idea to studybthis amazing planet and really supported it now will see what time will show us if we are the right thing like the aouthor writes "we should meet the very edges of imagination and innovation.

Output: Discuss the author's perspective on exploring Venus and the reasons why they support it despite the challenges presented by the planet's thick atmosphere and extreme temperatures. Analyze the author's use of examples and evidence to support their argument, including the comparison to Earth and NASA's proposed solutions for studying Venus. Evaluate the author's overall argument and consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of exploring this planet.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: i think that changing the school policy is not a very good idea. Most kids have a C or higher, but just because they don't have the grade required, doesn't mean they cant participate in sports. Many kids don't do very well in school, but sometimes they do sports to get their mind off of things. Some kids are very fanatic about sports, and that's what they like doing. Maybe they even want to have a future that has to do with sports. But not letting them do what they like , just because of not having a B or higher, is not a good solution . And if they do a test , and she/he didn't do well, they just lost their ability to do what they like. Some kids think that sports is their life, and that is the only thing that matters to them. Another reason why you should let kids participate even though they don't have a B or higher is, that the United States is one of the country's that has they most obesity in the world. And some of the kids need that exercise to try to maintain fit. and just because they don't have the accurate grade for it, is not a good idea.

Output: Should schools require a minimum grade requirement for students to participate in sports? Discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of such a policy, taking into consideration the impact on students' academic performance, physical health, and personal interests. Use evidence and examples to support your argument.