Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The "Face on Mars" is really not a a face at all. In fact, it is simply a landform. There is no alien remains or anything like that. It sure does look like a face, but that was merely a coinsidence. First of all, to prove this is a landform and not aliens is, there is only a face, no body If this really was aliens there would be a body to go along with this face. From the picture provided in the article, I can clearly see that there is a face and a fce only. Absolutely no body found. In fact, there is not even a bump or anything proving this has no body and aliens would most likely have a body if they have a head/face. The second reason as to why this cannot be an alien is, if it was an alien NASA would have found more than one by now. This landform was first discovered in 1976. That is a long time ago. If this truely was an alien that once had life, there would most definetly be more than one. But, there is not. There is only one. This is another reason proving this is not aliens, but just a landform. The third an final reason why this is nothing more than a landform, not aliens, in it would have been identified by now. NASA would have came out and said it already. There is no way we can actually prove that is actually an alien. But, we have classified it as a landform. We even have other landforms on earth to compre it too. Many say it is equivalent to a butte or mesa(many things found in the American Mest). "It reminds me most of Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho," Garvin says. In conclusion, this is not aliens. This is simply a landform. Even though it does look like a face we have supporting details that back up our argument. It is clearly not an alien. Everything needed to prove this is tight in this essay. I hope that now you have come to your senses and agree with me.

Output: Explain why the "Face on Mars" is not evidence of alien life and provide supporting evidence to back up your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
we should keep the Electoral college. The college is a process,not a place. The process consists of the selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for president and vice. The counting of electoral voters by congress. State's entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its congressional delegation. The college is widely regarded as an anachronism. The Electoral college despite its lack of Democratic Pedigree. We shouldnt have to change to election by popular vote for President. The Electoral college looks like a big help to President. The founding fathers established it in the constitution as a compromise between election of the president. The collge has many electors.270 electoral voters is required to elect the president.
Under 23rd amendemnt of constitution district of columbia is allocated 3 electors It could be arugues the Electoral college method of selecting the president may turn off potential voters. There may be a few things i dont agree with about the Electoral college. I dont like how voters dont vote for the presidnt but for slate of electors. The Electoral college is one by far the best things, It dont need to be taken from us. Many good things the college does. State Senator, We should keep the Electoral college. The process is great. There are many great things about the Electoral college. Its a big help with alot. Theres no dobut about the College.

Output: Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the Electoral college system in the United States and argue whether or not it should be kept in place.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: "My name is Luke, Luke Bomberger. The Seagoing program was a opportunity of a lifetime for me. Yes, there were many struggles and hardships but I got through it. You should really join the program it gives you something new to try in life. Also, it helps recover food supplies, animals, and much more for the 44 nations who joined together to make the UNRRA. There are amazing places you can go to. For intance, we took a trip to Greece. The Acropolis there was something special. In this program there is never a dull moment. You're either taking care of the animals, sight-seeing, being at night watchman. There is also times to have fun. The othercowboys and I have time to play games or do on board such as baseball, volleyball, table-tebbis tournaments, fencing, boxing, reading, whittling, or other games to pass the time. Since there are struggles to this job I might as well say them too. This job is much more than a adventure, it shows you unbelievable things in this world. My aunt Katie helped me prepare for this. She might not have known it but she did. The thing is though that I was never prepared of the dangers at sea. There are advantages and challenges apart of this job. Some challenges may be risky but if you join the Seagoing Cowboys program you are doing this for a good cause.

Output: Write an essay about your experience in the Seagoing program, including the challenges and rewards of the job, the places you visited, and the activities you participated in. Discuss the importance of the program in recovering food supplies and animals for the UNRRA, and the impact it has on the world. Also, reflect on the preparation you received for the job and the dangers you faced at sea. Finally, explain why you would recommend the Seagoing program to others.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Many people decide to take classes from home, in my opinion this should not be available for everyone I believe that people should not be allowed to take their courses from home they do not have much physical interaction with other people they do not have any type of influence they do not have the proper environment to study and focus at home people can also cheat if they are at home and giving their test.
 When you are at home the whole day and are taking classes online you are not able to make any physical interaction with other people when you are not interacting with other people you feel alone and you start to stress about things and you think that you do not have anyone to talk to about your issues which increases your stress level. By making physical interactions with people you are able to make bonds with other people and if you are in any type of situation you know that your friends will always have your back and that you can trust them, and also let them know that if they are in a situation in which they do not know what to do you are always there for them and will always try your best to help them. When you are at school you can also influence people in a good way and if you know that someone is doing something that they are not supposed to do, you can help them solve their issue or show them the right way to do the same thing and guide them to the right path For example: If you know that someone in your group of friends vapes or smokes, you and your group of friends should tell him/her that it is not right to do that and tell them the consequences of doing that action. If all of you try hard to make that person stop doing something he/ she may listen. In this way you can influence people in a good way. When you are at home and are taking courses online you do not have the proper environment to study and focus when you are at home, which for most people is the place where you got to relax, your mind knows that that specific place is for you to rest so it will think that you need to rest and will not work the way it would work at school because at school you know that you went there to study and to learn something. On the other hand, when you are at home you have many types of distractions for example when you are at home your Dad calls you to help him with something or your mom calls you to tell you something or if one of your younger sibling needs help in their homework. You have to do your work but you also have to listen to your parents. So you are not able to stay focused and maybe after listening to everyone you forgot what you learned because you had to leave it half way and you were not able to learn the whole topic. Another problem that I have heard about from several people is that when you are at home and are taking a test or an exam you can cheat When you cheat you may get a good grade but you will not have the knowledge which in long term can harm your career. For example: You are giving a final test for Spanish. You have to speak the language and you search the translation and read it off Google. You cheated on the test and got a 90%, you passed the test but you do not know how to speak that language. Now you have a degree which says that you passed your language with 90%. You go to a collage and a teacher sees your high school degree and starts talking in Spanish, but you cheated and do not really know how to speak Spanish. Now you are speechless and have nothing to say and you get rejected from the collage. In this way it also armed your practical life. Some people may say that there are also some people that are not able to come to school because of some specific reason or some people are influenced in a bad way at school But that does not apply to everyone, everyone is not in bad influence and if you are good yourself you would not let anyone lead you to the wrong way The people who say that some people are not able to come to school because of some specific reason, that does not apply on everyone. The school or the programs that provides home classes to students should take proof and solid reasoning for not coming to school and if they get proof that a student can not come to school only then allow them to take classes from home.

Output: Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of taking classes from home. In your essay, argue whether or not everyone should be allowed to take their courses from home. Consider factors such as physical interaction with others, influence, environment for studying, and the potential for cheating. Use specific examples and evidence to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Venus is a interesting planet cause of its Evening star which it a bright light and is a second planet of the sun when you look at Venus the density , size and distance gets the attention till where you want to discover the parts and ideas of it. the diferences about a spacecraft is that people wanted spacecraft to land on earth but it didn't work due to no survival that couldn't land more than a few hours thats why this planet is challenging for humans to study the reputations want people to be confused and get the meaning of this. Atmosphere is thick 97 percent carbon dioxide so temperatures goes up 800 degrees F and on earth the atomsphere is 90 times greater.
Sister Planet and Venus are the same thing its the better planet in the solar system which used to be covered in oceans and could supported peoples life just like the Earth. its rocky sediment and has features which are valleys, mountains, and craters.
NASA is working on venus the samples of rock, gas etc. are not working to take the samples its rough so a scienctist knows thay venus needs to be close to do their own vperonsal depsite risk for it to last. NASA working to get other people to study this and have advice.

Output: Explain the unique characteristics of Venus that make it an interesting planet to study, including its density, size, and distance from the sun. Discuss the challenges that humans face in studying Venus, including the difficulty of landing spacecraft on its surface and the extreme temperatures caused by its thick carbon dioxide atmosphere. Analyze the similarities and differences between Venus and Earth, including their geological features and potential for supporting life. Evaluate the current efforts of NASA to study Venus and the potential benefits of further exploration.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
This letter is about the cell phone policy the policy I would consider to use would be the policy number one.
 I believe the policy is good making phone calls checking on others, talking to friends or family and texting to friends is good but I would make a few changes to it the first thing I would change about it would be during class teachers or staff should check the phones to see if they are turned off. The other thing I would change about is, teachers and staff should keep watch on their students if they are using their cell-phone in class because sometimes they cannot be trusted. I would still consider the policy of number one just make these few changes to it.

Output: Propose modifications to cell phone policy number one that would improve its effectiveness in a school setting, particularly during class time. Consider the benefits and drawbacks of allowing students to use their phones for communication and entertainment, and suggest ways in which teachers and staff can monitor and enforce the policy to ensure compliance.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Imagine a lost, confused version of yourself. Perhaps it's an essay, a project, or a personal situation that has you conflicted. You have no idea what to do or what to think of. You are stuck. The first thing that pops into your head is to consult your peers, but not just one. Asking for advice from more than one person has many upsides. You can see what others think of your situation, there can be many different thoughts. Someone may suggest a better idea to you than others, it is always beneficial for you to consider a different perspective. There could be multiple ideas that you didn't even think of before. For example, if you had a ton of homework, there are many different things that people could suggest. Do the hardest things first, do the easiest things first, or just wait until the next day to complete it all. They all have different opinions, but you can get it all from just asking multiple people for advice. Not all advice given is automatically good. Let's say, for example, you are planning to redecorate your bedroom. Someone offers a neon-yellow pillow for your chair. You think to yourself, no way . Someone else tells you to hang up squares cut out from cardboard around the border of the entrance. You think, huh, that's not such a bad idea , until you ask one more person. They suggest that you declutter your shelf and invest in new curtains for a clean and bright look. Brilliant! The third suggestion is far better than the rest. Consulting others for advice can help you do that. Perhaps your situation isn't as horrible as you thought, maybe it could be easily fixed and dealt with. People other than yourself can help you see the good things in bad situations. You could have this sense of relief from just consulting someone for their opinion. Simple as that! Asking more than one person for advice is critical. You can see what others think, receive many different opinions that are better than the others, and view your dilemma in a new perspective. After all of that, your situation could seem easier to understand and not so terrible as you thought. Asking just one person for their thoughts is a mistake, do not forget to ask another!

Output: Explain the benefits of seeking advice from multiple sources when faced with a difficult situation or decision. Use examples to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The author has great passion for this topic but has not accomplished on supporting the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the danges. The author has many points on how others are trying to solve the problems on how to explore Venus but does not explain why the risk is worthy of exicuting. "Therefore, scientists seeking to conduct a thorough mission to understand Venus would need to get up close and personal despite the risk." This quote states that scientist need to take a risk but does not give a reason why the risk is neccesary. This is not the only way the author did not accomplish on supporting the idea. The author explains the history of Venus and its properties but that does not help support the idea. "Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth." This quote explains how the risk of exploring and studying Venus was lower "long ago" but does not explain or supports the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit. This is not the only way the author does not support the idea successfully. As a question can be the upbringing or curosity and reasoning, the author seems to not give a response to the question on supporting the idea. "The value of returning to Venuse seems indisputable, but what are the options of making such a mission both safe and scientifically productive?" The athour questions possible options on how to get both saftey and productivity, but does not question the risks and possible dangers of exploring Venus. As the passage continues the author only explains the options and possible ways on exicuting the idea but does not include the risks that the options hold. As the passage is very informative and holds great information, the author supports very poorly the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers. The author explains solutions that are a possobility but does not include the risks of the idea. The author also informs the audience about the history of Venus but boes not help on supporting the idea of studying Venus. The author unfortuntly, poorly supported the idea that Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers.

Output: Explain why studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the potential dangers, and evaluate the author's argument for supporting this idea in the given passage.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I do believe that community service is good, especially for young people. It gives them a sense of responsibility, helps them feel better about themselves, and serves the community at the same time. However, I do not believe that it should be required. Some kids already have too much on their plates, with things such as violin, dance, taking care of younger siblings, chores, and more. once you start forcing kids to do community service, it loses some of its meaning. If people are doing it for selfish reasons, then it's just not as sincere. Senior citizens would much rather be helped by nice kids than reluctant teenagers. Of course, kids who do community service often have better chances of getting into better schools. So I believe that community service should stay an optional activity, because if a kid wants to look good on their resume, then they'll have to work extra hard for it. If every teen has community service on their record, then it's just not the same. People who work harder than others deserve to get rewarded. Let's be honest, community service isn't every kids' thing. Sometimes, teenagers are really bad at community service. It's better to let them do their own thing than force them to terrorize elementary school kids. Some teens are better at participating at other things, such as drama club, science fairs, or more. We shouldn't force kids at this age to be more helpful, or charitable, because let me tell you, it most likely won't work. So while I'm in the opinion that community service is a great thing, it should not be abused. Some kids have many reasons not to be able to do community service. It doesn't mean they're heartless monsters, it just means they're busy. Trust me, the kids who actually want to do community service will find a way to do it. My friends are a shining example of that. You don't need to force us to do it, a lot of us will do it on our own. Please have more faith in us.

Output: Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of requiring community service for young people. Consider factors such as the impact on the community, the potential benefits for the individual, and the potential drawbacks of mandatory service. Use examples and evidence to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Community service is important in the country of the
Untied
States. Service in the community can change the place where one is working at.
 Finding community service can be easy It changes the person's character. I think that the principal should make everyone do service in the community.
 The service can change the place where is being done. The place can turn into a cleaner area. The kids of the community would learn that helping can be a good thing.
 The children would learn to not be in gangs.
 Many people's life be changed there will less people getting hurt by gangs.
 There be more people in collage. The whole world will be changed. Finding a community to help can be where you live at. A soup kitchen can be found near a locate church. There can be an old lady living next door that needs help with grocery. Or you can just donate coats to a coat drive in the winter.

Output: Explain the importance of community service in the United States and how it can positively impact the community. Provide examples of how community service can be found and how it can change a person's character. Discuss the potential benefits of mandatory community service for students and the community as a whole.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Do you think asking more than one person for advice is a good idea?
Well I think it is when you ask people for advice they have been through the same situation. Going to ask for advice from more than one person is important. When you want more advice you should talk to your parents, friends , or a older sibling.
The first person you should talk to is your parents because they are way older than you and they have had more experience with these type of situation.
They also know you better than anyone would because they have raised you and know what the best way for you is. The last reason you should talk to your parent is because they have most likely gone through this problem before which means that they know what will work the best and what wouldn't work.
Most of the time when you ask your parents for advice they give you what solves the problem.
The second person I would recommend talking to is a trusted friend.
They can give you some good advice because you spend almost 6 hours with them at school so they know what happening around you during school.
They would also be pretty honest with you because they want to give you advice that is good for you and that would help.
The final reason to talk with a friend or friends is because this is someone who you can talk to if you don't want to talk about it with you parents and you want to see what they would say before mentioning it to you parents.
The final person I would go talk to is an older sibling.
I would talk to them because they have been in your shoes many times.
So the advice they would give you would help you because it helped them.
Also they can keep this away from your parents.
Not only are they going to give you advice one what you asked them but they can keep it away from your parents until your ready to ask them.
Finally I would ask an older sibling for advice because they are older for a reason.
They most likely are there to help you when you need to so I would use it while you can before they either leave for college or already have left.

Output: Explain the benefits of seeking advice from multiple sources when faced with a problem or decision. Provide examples of different types of people one could seek advice from and how their perspectives could be helpful.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The Electoral College is a process of selecting electors to vote for the president. The Electoral College has both its pros and cons, many reasons for it to stay or be abolished. However, it has more reason to stay rather than changing to election by popular vote for the President.  The wnning canidate for U.S President should be who's the best rather rather than who's more popular. The Electoral College may not be the most democratic method but, it does create a sense of balance. The Electoral College has equal tran-regional appeal garuntees an outcome Therfore, the Electoral College should not be abolished. The Electoral College garuntees an outcome. With popular voting and a tie could occur. As, Souce 3; "In Defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our despised methaod of choosing the President" informs "The reason is that the winning canidate's share of the Electoral College invariable exceeds his share of the popular vote."(18). So the losing canidate could argue that winner isn't who the people want however, it's the political party members who chose the electors. In, Source 1; "What is the Electoral College?", it states that "Each canidate ruinning for President in your state has his or her own group of electors. The electors are generally chosen by the canidate's political party..." Therefore, there is no mystery or deciet, each party knows their electors and canidates so the people are the ones who indirectly chose the winner. As a result, the Electoral College promises an undebatabe outcome. Also,the Electoral College doesn't have any prejudice based on region or location. "The Electoral College requires to have a trans-regional appeal." (sorce 3).  Therefore, a canidate has to campiaign in all regions, withought just focusing on just one. So every region has an equal oppurtunity and knowledge to be able to vote. Also this way there's a less chance of "The residents of other reions to feel disenfranchised-to feel that their votes do not count, that the new president will have no regard for their interest, that he really isn't their president."(19). That feeling of equality and "my opinion matters" is exactly what America is about and this aspect of the Electoral College captures that beautifully. In conclusion, the Electoral college may not be the most democratic way of voting however, it is quite fair.  If we only had popular voting canidates would possible just focuse on one are to build a strong support base. This would'nt give every region or person a fair chance and strong word, which is against everything America stands for. Equality is one of the major virtues of America and the Electoral College expresses equality through balance more so than popular vote. The Electoral College garuntees a certaint outcome without debates or tie breakers. It allows every region to have a fair chance in the election by making sure they are well informed and included through the recquirment of trans-regional appeal. For these reasons the Electoral College should not be abolished and changed to popular vote for United States of America.

Output: Discuss the pros and cons of the Electoral College as a method of selecting the President of the United States. Argue whether the Electoral College should be abolished and replaced with a popular vote system or kept in place. Consider the potential advantages and disadvantages of each method, including the impact on regional representation, the potential for tie votes, and the overall fairness of the election process. Use at least three sources to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I would go with policy number one because something might come up that day at school and the student might need to tell a parent what happened. I wouldn't let the students have the phones all day because that would effect their learning skills They would become hooked to their phone and not listen to their teacher as much. But I would go ahead and have them use their phones through out the day when they are not in classes. Like say it started snowing really bad at school that day and your coach tells you at school that there will be no practice after school. You could call or text your parent ahead of time during school that there is no practice. So it would be more efficient for you and your parent both. Your parent could go home earlier without having to wait for you after practice. I just think that it is important to have your phone at least when your not in class. But sometimes it isn't good to have phones at all in school Like say someone at your school got shot or maybe something very bad happened to someone and your texting and calling your parents, grandparents, friends, and other people about what had happened. Well you and your whole school plus the people your texting and calling all the time. They block the phone station so you cant call the real important people like the hospital or police That would be bad so the there are PROS and CONS about having phones at schools.

Output: Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of allowing students to use their phones during school hours, and propose a policy that balances the benefits of having phones with the potential distractions they may cause. Consider scenarios where having a phone may be beneficial, such as communicating with parents about schedule changes, as well as situations where phones may be a hindrance, such as during emergencies or important announcements. Use evidence and examples to support your argument and provide a clear rationale for your proposed policy.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The Face on Mars is one of the most contriversial landforms around. Many people think that it is an artifact that was left behind by past civilizations on Mars. On the other hand, there are people that beleive it is just a mesa, "landorrms common around the American West." There are many people in both parties, making for a huge "debate." The most logical, however, is that the Face is naturally occuring, due to the evidance that NASA has been able to uncover. The people that say it is an ancient civilization use illogical evidance for their conclusions, such as, "alien markings were hidden by haze." However, the people that believe it is naturally occuring use stable evidance, including, "Malin's team captured an extraordinary photo using the camera's absolute maximum resolution.' Each pixel in the 2001 image spans 1.56 meters, compared to 43 meters per pixel in the best 1976 Viking photo." This evidance shows that the best technology we have shows nothing more than, "a lava dome that takes the form of and isolated mesa about the same height as the Face on Mars." Another way to show that the Face on Mars is naturally occuring is the comparison to the lanforms here on Earth, such as the mesa landforms in the American West In the passage, Jim Garvin, a cheif scientist at NASA, working specifically on Mars exploration, is quoted saying,"It reminds me most of Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho." Garvin, as said before, is a chief scientists at NASA. If he concludes that it is just like a lanform people can see here, than why would anyone be able to argue that? People strive to find out what is in the unknown. Researchers are some of the people that put their lives into getting the best evidance that they can find about the unknown. The Face on Mars is one example of many projects scientists have put time and effort into. They will always find the best solution or answer to whatever the question may be. Why not trust their conclusions?

Output: Explain the controversy surrounding the Face on Mars and the evidence supporting the argument that it is a naturally occurring landform, rather than an artifact left behind by past civilizations on Mars.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I believe that we should change the system to "election by popular vote". If we were to change the way we elect our president im sure citizens would be more pleased with the over all outcome. People vote on who they think is best fit to represent them and give them the best over all outcome. When using the "electoral college" you are not voting for the president but you are voting for a state of electors. It would be easier to simply allow presidents to get the popular vote in order to make the election more fair all around. The "electoral college" is unfair to voters because of the winner-take-all system. It is time to change our voting methods because the "electoral college" system is outdated, irrational, and unfair to citizens When people place their vote they belive they are putting in a vote for the president they choose, not for a slate of electors. The "electoral college" is a very non-democratic way of selecting your president. In a way the government is deceiving their citizens by the way our voting method is set up. When people vote they feel a sense of independence because they are allowed to choose who they would like to represent them in congress. But instead once they place their vote it goes to electors rather than a simple vote towards the one they selected. If you were to change the way people's votes were counted it would be easier and faster to elect a president and get him into office to fix world-wide problems.
In all three articles at least one section has made it clear on their opinion to abolish the electoral college. Figures such as Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, and even the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have agreed on abolishing the electoral college When voting for president you are voting for a slate of electors, but do we even know who these supposed electors are! Are votes are being manipulated and we are not even aware of who is doing it. If we can not vote for are president without going through electors we should be able to vote for the electors who are voting for are president. It is only fair that we have some say in everything that is going on. When votes are being placed we should be informed of all that is going on. If you were to vote for your favorite tv show but your vote had to go through twenty different people all with different opinions you would be frustrated. Now imagine that scenario but with something extremely more significant than a televison show, the president. You are trusting possibly the next four years of your life with strangers in which you have never heard of before. It would only be fair if we could simply change the system to popular vote rather than electoral college. If you switch to popular vote more people would be more likely to vote because they could have more confidence about their vote. They would feel free to make their own decision and trust it would not be tampered with by a stranger. People deserve a fair vote and with the popular vote that is what you are giving them. Because every living being deserves equality. Changing the system would not only be helpful for citizens but helpful for the congress. Instead of having random members of congress choose the president they can work on serious issues around the world. They can stop worrying about foolishness and do their jobs. In conclusion changing the way people vote is easier for everybody. It saves time for electors and it gives people a chance to see who they are really voting for. Presidents would have to go to each state and appeal to them in order to get a vote. I belive that is what we need. They would be required to actually work for a position in office rather than speaking on whjat they are going to do and paying someone else to elect them. We should have faith in our president and know who we are voting for before we cast our vote. This system seems more fair and more modern to the twenty first century. This is a system most Americans would agree with.

Output: Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the "election by popular vote" system compared to the "electoral college" system in the United States presidential elections. Evaluate the fairness and effectiveness of each system and provide examples to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
When you first hear of this new software you may not see a need for such technology to exist. However, once you take a look into what this exciting software is capable of, you might actually grow into the idea I believe that this software could just end up being a helpful resource used in everyday life. If executed in the correct manners, I believe that this software could be an incredible resource that serves many different purposes Not too long ago, technology became an everyday tool in schools around the globe. If new software such as this was implemented into devices we used at school, as a student I believe that I would benefit from it greatly. The author used the example predicted by Dr. Thomas Huang of a student who is getting bored or confused. The device could potentially produce a pop-up providing help or motivation and encouragement.
 This software could be put introduced to many ways of life. For example, self-checkout stations and bank ATM's. If you appear to need help you will provided with assistance. It could potentially be a major improvement for costomer service. Software like this would definitely take getting used to, but would be worth it in the end if we are optimistic enough. Another possibility would be for this software to be used while using serach engines If you appear to not be satisfied, you will be directed to a page of new results. Perhaps if you show interested in certain results but not others, you could get a page of new result compiled of just the results you seemed interested in. Similar to the example of web ads appearing on your screen given to us by the author. I believe that this software could end up being a very important feature in technology. This technology may not be very extensive yet. However, it definitely has potential. It could be implemented into many regions of everyday life. I think that the possibilities are endless.

Output: Discuss the potential benefits and applications of a new software that provides assistance and personalized recommendations based on user behavior and preferences. Consider how this software could be implemented in various settings, such as schools, self-checkout stations, and search engines. Evaluate the potential impact of this technology on customer service and user experience.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Driverless cars are exaclty what you would expect them to be. Cars that will drive without a person actually behind the wheel controlling the actions of the vehicle. The idea of driverless cars going in to developement shows the amount of technological increase that the wolrd has made. The leader of this idea of driverless cars are the automobiles they call Google cars. The arduous task of creating safe driverless cars has not been fully mastered yet. The developement of these cars should be stopped immediately because there are too many hazardous and dangerous events that could occur. the driver will be alerted when they will need to take over the driving responsibilites of the car. This is such a dangerous thing because we all know that whenever humans get their attention drawn in on something interesting it is hard to draw their focus somewhere else. The article explains that companies are trying to implement vibrations when the car is in trouble. Their are some people out there who do not feel vibrations and therefore would not be able to take control of the car when needed. The article also states that companies are trying to put in-car entertainment into the car while it is being driven. This is just another thing that will distract the person who is supposed to be ready at all times to take over driving when asked to do so. Another thing that can go wrong with these cars is any type of techological malfucntion. Every person with any kind of technological device has experienced some sort of error. Now imagine if your car has an error technologically and it takes the life of one your loved ones. The article talks about sensors around the car that read the surroundings of the car and that is what helps he car to drive without a true driver behind the wheel. Those sensors could have a malfunctions and be sensing something that is that even there and make a left turn into a 100 foot deep lake. The vibrations that cause the driver to be notified to drive could malfunction and now the driver has no way of knowing that the car is in trouble and now you, the driver, and the rest of your passengers are being buried in your local cemetery. who to blame for the wreck if there were possibly some sort of technological malfunciton or even some sort of human error when taking over the driving aspect. Should the manufacturer of the car be blamed or should it be the driver? No one knows because there is so many different factors that attribute to who to assign the blame to. Some of what will have to be made is a judgement call. When it comes to insurance and having to pay for any damages you do not want someone to have to make some sort of judgement call. What if that judgement call that was made was the wrong call? Now there are going to be even more lawsuits today in our courts than there already are. This problem alone will just lead to many more issues today in the world that should not have to be dealt with. With all these things that could possibly go wrong with these driverless cars there is no way that the developement of them should continue any further. In today's society if something bad COULD happen or something COULD go wrong, it WILL happen, and it WILL go wrong. There are just way too many safety hazards that come along with these driverless cars. Becuase of all of these problems that arise with the cars it is just a gargantuan risk to implement these cars into our lifestyles.

Output: Discuss the potential hazards and risks associated with the development and implementation of driverless cars, including technological malfunctions, human error, and issues with assigning blame in the event of an accident. Consider the impact of in-car entertainment and the effectiveness of alert systems in notifying drivers to take over control of the vehicle. Evaluate the feasibility of continuing the development of driverless cars in light of these safety concerns.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Everyday people die in car accidents because they use cell phones while driving. According to research cell phones are leading factors that cause accidents. Studies show that a cell phone put drivers at a four time greater risk of a crush Despite of a danger, people still use cell phones because they want to be always available and keep in touch with other people. Taking eyes off the road while driving is one of the first lessons that is taught to a driver in his early driver's education. Drivers who talk while driving do not pay attention to road and thus end up in an accident. They put not only their life in danger but other drivers and pedestrians. Text messaging while driving is a bigger danger than talking on a phone while driving While texting, the drivers have to completely divert their attention from road to their cell phone and their hands from the steering wheel to the cell phone.
 Hands free devices are used to avoid accidents, but recent studies shows it is in the leading cause of accidents cell phone car chargers force the driver to take both of his hands off the steering wheel to car charger and cell phone and thus loses control of vehicle and putting life in danger.

Output: Discuss the dangers of using cell phones while driving and the impact it has on road safety. Include statistics and research findings to support your argument. Additionally, explore the reasons why people continue to use cell phones while driving despite the risks involved. Finally, evaluate the effectiveness of hands-free devices in reducing the risk of accidents caused by cell phone use while driving.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Everyone has an opinion, some are helpful, yet others just are going to make your life worse. You might ask why anyone would care about someone else's opinion, well it's hard to answer that question. You see, having multiple opinions can help limit the bias from the first opinion you received. Thus, why wouldn't you want to have multiple opinions, well it's quite simple, it's because people in our world are too scared to ask for others opinion or their advice. When asking for advice you are receiving wisdom, this wisdom can guide you to many great things, or it could lead you to absolute disaster. You will be guided into doing the wrong things in your life however you could stop all of that with a bit of advice. Having an opinion from one person can be very helpful, but just imagine if you could see both sides of your problem, thus leading you to obtain enough information on your problem and make the right choice. Seeking multiple opinions can help you make a better choice wisdom from those around you is helpful, it will help limit bias, two opinions is always better than one. Bias, bias is a thing no one should want in the opinions they are receiving. It is never a good choice to make to accept a biased opinion as a truth. Staying away from a biased opinion will benefit in so many unbelievable ways one could be eliminating the untruthful opinions from your life. It can be very unhelpful as well, these biased opinions could lead you down a road you should not go down. You can have a very bright future awaiting for you, but the one bias opinion you listen to can and will destroy your life. You might ask how could it destroy your life in an instant, well people will look at you differently based off the one bad biased opinion you listened to, and building that former life you previously had will virtually be impossible. Wisdom is one of the most important things you will ever receive. Wisdom can be received or given by anyone such as your peers and elders. Everyone you meet will always have a choice to make therefore for every choice you have to make daily will effect your life forever. Some however will not be as big as others deciding what you will have fir dinner is no where as big of a decision as what you will do when your house burns down or you lose your job. It you have two opinions you will be able to see both sides of the problem therefore making it easier to for you to make the right choice. Having only one opinion is definitely worse than having multiple because you are unable to have the option to see the other side. The one opinion could lead you into making some wrong choices, yet have multiple will lead to make some of the better choices that you could have made. Having the most opinions possible could change your life for the better, and possibly make your life easier. Although, receiving multiple opinions could sound easy it is quite difficult, due to the fact that nit everyone is going to want to help you. Some people in our world will not want you to succeed. However one opinion is worse than having multiple because you are unable to see everything that could be harmful towards you. Obtaining multiple opinions for your problem is helpful for making the right choice because personal experience or wisdom is helpful, helps take away biased opinions, and multiple opinions from others is always better than one opinion. Who would care about others opinions, finding the answer will be almost impossible. Multiple opinions can limit the bias you have previously been given. Why would you even want to obtain opinions from others if they are all bad, well that's not true, opinions from others can be good for you to listen to. Wisdom form others should be a big part in the choices you make. However, you will have to be sure that they persons' opinion you are listening is trying to help you. Opinions come in two forms good and bad however you must do everything in your power to only listen to the good and not harmful opinions.

Output: Explain the importance of seeking multiple opinions when making important decisions and how it can help limit bias. Provide examples of how biased opinions can lead to negative consequences and how obtaining wisdom from others can guide individuals towards making better choices.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The use of technology is getting advanced more and more as each day goes on. So by now we should be able to know is Mona Lisa was smiling or not. Now these days technology is informational and often true so why shouldnt we belive the results. In the first paragraph its states she is 83 percent happy,9 percent disgusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angery. By looking at the painting you would probaly belive that because she is smiling, she couldve been fearful because she didnt know Leonardo da Vinci, and she couldve been angery because at the time she wouldve had to be sitting there for hours until he finished or he would have to start all over. In the passage tehy dop have good evidence if you studied anatomy you would be able to understand how all the facial expressions work. They even claim that da Vinci studieed anatomy which helped him paint her facial muscle precisely. They even teach you how to make the same face she made in the painting. Based of the information they staed in the passage i do believe that the teachnology called Facial Action Coding System can identify human emotion.

Output: Using the information provided in the passage, analyze the use of technology in identifying human emotions and its application in determining whether Mona Lisa was smiling or not.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Is Venus a worthy pursuit despite the danger, I say no because Venus is over 800 degrees fahrenheit and the pressure is 90 thimes greater than what we had to experience on planet Earth. First the text states ¨ These conditions are far more extreme than anything humans encounter on Earth, such an enviorment wuld crush even a submarine accustomed to diving to deepest parts of our oceans and would liquefy many metals.¨(Paragraph 3) The quote is saying is event though our planet can mealt things Venus can mealt is a lot faster than Earth can.
 Then the test also states ¨Venus has the hottest surface temperatures of any planet in our solar system, even though Mercury is closer to our sun. Beyond high pressure and heat, Venusian geology and weather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and freguent lightning strikes to probes seeking to land on its surface.¨(Paragraph 3) The test is saying even though Mercury is the closet planet to the sun Venus has the highest preasure and heat and Benusin geology and weather presents additional impendiments like valcanos, earthquakes, and freguent lighting so it? hard for scienetist to land rockests on Venus. So when you asked me if Venus is worthy pursuit despite the dangers My anwser will still my no because there are still thing on Venus we don know about. And even though scientist are trying to take new egimpment up tho Venus it still going to be tough to still figure out what still up their in Venous.

Output: Explain why the author believes that pursuing Venus is not worth the danger, citing evidence from the text.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The main advantages to limiting car usage would be less accedents and less polution. to start off with cars can make you very tense and then posibly resulting in a crash. Without cars people would be less tense and be calm every day as they go to work. For example Heidrun Walter said " When i had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way. " In the outskirts of freiburg street parking, drive ways, and home garages are generally forbidden. Their streets are completely car free except for the main thoroghfare. Freiburg does allow car ownership but there are only two places to park, large garrages at the edge of the develoupment, where a car owner buys a space, for $40,000, along with a home. As a result 70% of the people do not own cars, and 57% sold a car to be able to live there. People now walk, take the tram, or ride bicycles to school and work, and yet these people are very happy about it. Planes are now taking this concept to the suburbs. They are doing this by putting new building walking distance from those people insted of the malls were people have to drive in order to get there. in addition to people being less tense banning cars would result in less polution.  Paris enforced a partial driving ban to clear the air of the global city. After five days of smog rivaled china which is one of the most poluted cities of the world. Diesels were the blame. But finally on monday the smog cleared enough for the ruling French party to rescid the ban for odd-numbered plates on tuseday. This ban also went on to Colombia for three years they have been doing this and they only allow buses and taxies everyone else  gets a $25 fine. Eventually two other colombian cities, Cali and Valledupar joined the event. kids now are not even wanting to get a drivers license they would rather walk. these kids get their jobs by looking at the ones that are in walking distance. this is a very good thing because the less drivers the less pollution there is in the air. in conclusion if we limited the usage of cars people would be more relaxed and there would be less polution in the air pluss people would be gatting exercise so people would benifit from this and our world would be much cleaner.

Output: Discuss the advantages of limiting car usage, including the potential reduction of accidents and pollution. Use examples from cities like Freiburg and Paris, as well as the impact on individuals and communities. Consider the potential benefits of alternative modes of transportation, such as walking, biking, and public transit.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
As a student enrolled in public schools I have had various experinces where I felt that I didn't fit in; or felt severe levels of stress and anxiey. I am now a junior in highschool and have now gotten somewhat used to what is required of me in a public school. If the the privilage of taking online classes would have been offered to me I wouldn't have lost my personality and mental health to the society that is seen in public schools. Now, that the oppurtunity of enrolling in classes online and studying from home is an option; people that feel that they wouldn't be able to handle the society in public schools now have another way to look. The concept that students may benefit from taking classes at home is valid they would be able to achieve more focus and concentration they would experince less stress and anxiety; thus strengthening their mental health. Students may benefit from taking classes at home because they could gain more focus and concentration. There are some people who concentrate better when studying alone. These students enrolled in online classes may be more focused because they are in a more comfortable environment, which is their home. They will learn more because they don't have to wake up as early as people that go to public schools. They also wouldn't have to worry much about their apperance such as what they're going to wear, how their hair needs to be styled, how to hide their eyebags, if they need make up on, and what shoes to put on. They could also perform better academically because they have the oppurtunity of starting thier classes later. Having enough hours of sleep benefits students because it allows the brain to function at its full potential. The students could feel more enthusiastic about school because they don't have to listen to a teacher tell them what they can and can't do. Students will benefit from taking classes from their homes in the form of having better mental health. Every human being at some point during their lifetime experinces the feeling of being nervous, anxious, or stressed. Most students experince this when they have to present themselves or a project infront of a class full of other students. Their anxiety rises especially in these situations because they feel like they're being judged or scrutinized. To add to their stress and anxiety the students have to deal with other students, teachers, and various homework assignments. They could also lose their personalities to the society found in public schools. Students often lose who they truly are when they are under an immense amount of pressure. Which leads to their mental health decreasing drastically.
 Some may argue that student may become isolated if they take classes at home. Those that argue that claim may also think that student who take classes at home may lack communication skills, which are essential for the future. Others can also say the some students aren't ready to take on resonsibility that comes with taking classes online. Overall, enrolling in classes that you are able to take at home can benefit students in the long run because they will feel less pressured. Their mental health would be strong and they would have a strong sense of self. They would also perform better because they would get the necessary amount of hours that a person needs to function properly.

Output: Discuss the potential benefits of taking classes online from home for students who struggle with fitting in or experiencing high levels of stress and anxiety in public schools. Consider factors such as increased focus and concentration, better mental health, and the potential drawbacks of isolation and lack of communication skills.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
In this story the author is talking about how humas have not made it on the planet of Venis. At least that we know about The article said that scientits think there may be life or have been life on the planet With scientists thinking if there is something up there on the planet there is a good chance that they will be able to find out soon with all the technology we have today.
With all the things we have today I think we will find something on venus. If we do then there is a fact that there is aliens that are alive, unless they are just like us but from another planet. And that planet is closer to the sun than earth.
 I think with all the things in the article we will find somthing or that there was something there on venus at some point. It could of been a trillion years ago or there is still life on it today we will just have to find out. Time is the only thing that we have on are side.

Output: Discuss the possibility of life on the planet Venus based on the article provided. Consider the opinions of scientists and the advancements in technology that may aid in the discovery of extraterrestrial life. Also, explore the potential implications of finding life on Venus and the significance of its proximity to the sun.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: How does asking for someone else advice helps you feel better? Generic_Name always said "Asking for someone else opinion makes you come up with a better answer for your questions." If I have the chance to ask for someone opinion I feel like it will make me feel much better knowing what is someone else prospective about that asking for someone else advice benefits you is making the correct choice. helps you understand what is others point of view by asking for their opinion. sometimes asking for someone opinion is much better. When someone ask you to give them an advice about the same topic you can combine your opinion with someone else to give her/she a great helpful advice. there are many ways asking for someone opinion benefits you For example asking question you don't understand or asking them what you can do to understand. Where can you find information that will help you answer all the questi someone else advice can help sometimes be successful in life. Also asking for someone advice can help you a lot in the way you th

Output: Explain the benefits of asking for someone else's advice and how it can lead to making better decisions and understanding different perspectives. Use examples to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
I think the claim would be that the new technology that they called the Facial Action Coding System is and good and bad idea some times it could brake down and you don't have anything else to use to see what your face look like when you are not happy. Some times it work some people would now how to keep it up and nothing would happen to it but if something did happen to it they wold know how to fits it real fast then you would be able to use it again if not you could build a new one if you would want too. They would show you if your really happy or surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness by using the new technology that they built for you to see if you feel bad or anything you need to. now if you don't now already.
They might even make you look at youself in the mirror even if you don't really want to so you can see what you look like even if you really don't want to look at your face even though you look pretty.
If they make a paintting of you would keep beause you should it will make you have some feeling inside your body telling you that you are very pertty and you should be happy about it but if you think that you are very ugly then their is something wrong with you cause everyone is pertty in thier own ways even if you think your not.

Output: Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the Facial Action Coding System as a tool for analyzing facial expressions and emotions. Consider the potential for breakdowns in the technology and the impact on individuals' self-perception and self-esteem. Evaluate the usefulness of the system in various contexts, such as psychology research, marketing, and law enforcement.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Today in society we have alot of disagreements on which president should be elected on the day all votes are finally counted and the votes are tallied up to the final result of who is going to be our new president of the United States, but what is our system for doing this?
One way is
Electoral College,
Electoral college is a process consisted of thye selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for President and Vice President, and the counting of the votes from congress. So if you think about it we are just electors for electors. This College consists of 538 electors. A majority of 270 votes can win the election for the President. Under the Electoral college, voters dont vote for the president, they vote for state electors who in turn elect the president. There are many veiw points of the Electoral College, but most would decied that its unfair, outdated, and irrational. The best arguments in favor of it are mostly assertions whithout much basis in reality. People want to have their vocies hear for the country they live in, they want an opinion that matters! You can't have that when someone else is speaking for you...

Output: Explain the process of the Electoral College and discuss the arguments for and against its use in electing the President of the United States.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: People should agree that the face on Mars was probably an accident. The face probably was not a face, it could have been another Martian mesa. A rock os some type could have hit it or a meteor could also. Next, NASA took pictures of it, and NASA was researching it and studying it, so they can get more information on it. After studying it, they took a picture of it, and they engaged the public with it. People started to have debates about the picture and what it could have ment. "Some people think the Face is bona fide evidence pof life on Mars." The others are trying to protect it so NASA could be a little bit safer. The picture did look like an Egyptian Pharaoh NASA said it was a "huge rock information" because it is very similar to a human's face. Next, you cannot just asumed the planet was made from aliens because there is a human's face on it. You got to study the artifact before you can assume it is from aliens. After that, you got to be able to back up your answer , and saying why it is not a face. "Thousands of anxious web sufers were waiting when the image first appeared on a JPL website, revealing a natural landform." People can asume it is a human's face because it look likes it. Another thing is that there is human's face on it, can mean life on the planet, Mars. Also the rock or the artifact does have an Egyptian Pharoah, it could mean a human was at one point up there. It probably is possible to have civilization on Mars. In conclusion, the artifact could have just been hit by a rock. People need to belive most things that are not really true.

Output: Explain the controversy surrounding the "Face on Mars" and the arguments for and against it being a natural landform or evidence of life on Mars. Provide evidence to support your argument and discuss the importance of studying artifacts before making assumptions about their origins.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
The idea of having driverless cars is something that brings many questions in my head such as how safe they will be and how they will improve our atmosphere. In the article "Driverless Cars Are Coming" they bring up many good ideas about driveless cars and some ideas that I just plain out think would'nt be good for our world at all. In my retrospect after reading "Driverless Cars Are Coming" I feel as though these driveless cars would be an amazing idea to contribute to our community. These cars would benefit our community in many ways not just for our safety but for our atmosphere. Having driverless cars would impact our safety in many ways such as reducing accidents on the streets. Having these driverless cars would reduce car accidents because the driverless car would have laser beams to constantly update the surroundings of the car such as the other cars making it safer for humans to drive. Not only would the human be aware of his or her surroundings but the computer would be tracking the safety too which would help even more while driving.
In paragraph four of "Driverless Cars Are Coming"
it states " it uses laser beams to form a constantly updating 3-D model of the car's surroundings". Driveless cars would also have antilock brakes which would be provided in these cars incase of rollovers and skids. According to the article of "Driverless Cars Are Coming" it states "automakers used speed sensore at the wheels in the creation of antilock brakes. Within 10 years,those sensors had become more advanced to detect and respond to the danger of out of control skids or roll overs". These cars would help our safety of everyone in many ways possible. These cars would help our atmosphere with all the pollution that we as humans make everyday The tank for these driverless cars would only use half of what a normal car uses today. This would reduce our pollution by a dramatic decrease and it would help nature and many of the animals but most importantly us. In the article "Driverless Cars Are Coming" it states "The cars he foresees would use half of the fuel of today's taxis". Just imagine a cleaner world for everyone. These cars would help make our world a cleaner,greener and greater place to live in. The awsome thing about these cars is that it would only make us drive in bad traffic,working zones and around accidents. But the car would announce before we are needed just to be aware. Not many times will the car need someone to be in control over it. It would introduce the problem way ahead of time due to its GPS that the car will include. You will be able to most likely avoid these problems before you even get to them. I believe these cars would be a huge bonus to our community. Not only in safety but as well as our enviroment and our world. It would gives us a better world to live in and maybe a safe one too if everything goes well as plan. These cars are the future and will make our future better than ever before.

Output: Discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of driverless cars on both safety and the environment, using the article "Driverless Cars Are Coming" as a reference.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Have you ever been confused on how the president is elected from two huendred and sevendy votes when you see more than a that many poeple a day Well I'm not because I can't vote, but I do think that the Electoral College should stay in action.  People may not like the Electoral College because it isn't there vote that really dessideds the winner of the eletion. I am in favor for the Electoral College because it does help us out even if we don't always see it. The Electoral College helps us by avioding run-off elctions, where the votes are too close to desside a clear winner. It does this by in most states the majority of the popular votes dessides where all the votes go.  "That pressure, which would greatly complicate the presidential election process, is reduced by the Electoral College, which invariably produces a clear winner."(Posner)  In the 2012 election the populor vote in Florida was very close and if the president was dessided form the popular vote Floride would have had little effect on the eletion, but since the Electoral College dessides the winner, Obama had tweinty nine more votes to his campaign.  "Most states have a winner-take-all system that awards all the winning presidental candidate."(the Office of the Federal Register) Some people may thing that the Electoral College sould be done away with so that the president can be dessided by popular votes. If this were to happen then there would be the chance to have run-off elections, since there would be no clear winner if the votes were very close.  There would be the complete unbalance from state to state, Rhode Island would have little to no effect on the election, where as with the Electoral College it could be the state to choose the winner. The Electoral College keeps it so that each state has a bigger impact on the election and saves us from run-off elections from a close number of votes.  If we didn't have the Electoral College in place then history would be different for better or for worse, but I think that the Electoral College should be here to stay.

Output: Explain the purpose and benefits of the Electoral College in the United States presidential election process, and argue for or against its continued use.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Almost all students love Summer vacation. But this time out of school is also a major halt in leaning. This halt can cause students to fall out of the rhythm of daily learning and cause them to forget material taught during the previous school year. This is why schools started implementing Summer projects to keep students engaged in learning. Summer projects have been traditionally designed by teachers but some people argue that students should be designing these projects. Teachers should be designing the Summer projects they know more about the material, they would make it challenging enough, it would be an easy and simple process.
 One reason teachers should be designing the Summer projects is because they know more about the material. Many of these teachers have been teaching this information for a couple years. This means that these teachers have a good idea of what the students know from this school year and what information they should be prepared for in the coming school year. This information would greatly aid in making the Summer projects because the teachers would know how to format it in a way that students are familiar with but also prepares them for the new information that will be presented in the next school year. This would be very helpful to kids because it sets them up for success in the next year. Another reason why teachers should be designing the Summer projects is because they would make it challenging enough. If kids tried to create a Summer project, it would most likely result in an easy assignment that would take no effort. This would destroy the entire purpose of the summer assignment and give no benefit to the student. But if teachers designed it, then it would more likely be a project of an acceptable rigor. The projects needs to be challenging enough that it keeps kids engaged in learning so they will benefit from it.
 The last reason teachers should be designing the Summer projects is because it would be a easy and simple process If a couple teachers get together and make the Summer project it would be easy for them to make a rubric to go along with it. If the students make the Summer project then it would be much more of complicated .
The students would most likely have to brainstorm ideas and pick one for the project which would take time, then pitch the idea to the teachers and wait for approval, and then after all that is done the teachers have to use a project that they did not make to create a rubric for grading. This seems like a lot of extra work when it could easily be simplified by the teachers creating the project. Some people may argue that if the kids design the project they will be more engaged and willing to complete it, but the pros of teachers creating the project definitely outweigh the cons. Summer projects are extremely helpful and important to students learning experience. This is why it is so important that these projects are well constructed and thought out. Considering all this, it is clear that the best people to complete the task of creating these projects are teachers.

Output: Should teachers or students be responsible for designing Summer projects? Provide reasons to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
The use of this technology for a classroom full of students will not be valuable. Although it would be interesting to see what the students are feeling during a lesson. How is the data going to be of use in science? The students can express their feelings, but what are the researchers going to do with this information. This technology should be used, but not in the classroom. If we do end up using the system to detect emotions where will the data go. It will help the video game industry with the evidence from paragraph 6 "The same technology can make computer-animated faces more expressive-for video games or video surgery." Why only put this into a classroom put it into the robots we are building today so they seem more human-like, so they can become more advanced than a ordinary robot The direction the researchers are taking are great, but the choice of where to put it needs to be different. Just putting it into a classroom would be a waste of time and money. There is so much wasted potential if the system is put into a classroom.
we could use this technology for bigger and better things. For instance better facial recognition security systems so it can be more accurate reading faces and does not open or let in anyone that looks like the person. Or lock the person out of anything that is protected by facial recognition. Another example of how this could be useful in other ways is the facial recognition can be used in the police force to find a match of a person that was caught on camera to be tracked down and captured. The way that the researchers are using it for is inefficient and wasteful and should not be implemented in classrooms.

Output: Evaluate the potential uses of emotion detection technology beyond the classroom setting and analyze its effectiveness in improving facial recognition security systems and aiding law enforcement agencies in identifying suspects. Consider the limitations and ethical implications of using this technology in these contexts.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I think you should require all students to perform community service because many students laze around with nothing to do, when they could be helping the community. Many kids who are bored tend to get caught up in bad things , such as gangs, drugs, and violence. In requiring kids to perform community service, you are preventing them from doing bad things, you are giving them something to do after school and you are helping them help the community. I walk around my community to see kids fighting, doing drugs, stealing, and other bad things Many kids are bored after school , with nothing to do , no friends to play with, so they sit around and get fat and lazy. They could make the community a better place, by cleaning up trash , and helping the community stay a nice, safe, and clean place. So , I think you should require kids to perform community service, because it would be good for them AND the community.

Output: Explain the benefits of requiring students to perform community service, including how it can prevent them from engaging in negative behaviors and how it can improve the community. Use specific examples from your own observations and experiences to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I would like to say i think this policy is uncalled for, and i think students should be able to play in sports or other activities if they have a c or better I mean it's not like their failing or anything. But on the other side of the story students should be able to get c or better and not get a d or f. I could see that students should past every class with a c or better. If students don't have a c or better then they could not play in sports or other activities. I also think that it would be highly unfair if students wouldn't be able to play in sports with a c or better. Some students love to play basketball, football, or even volleyball, and if they wouldn't be able to play with a c i bet they would be highly upset. Students try their best in the classrooms to get their work done, and to get a good grade. So I say that this policy shouldn't be past on to students.

Output: Discuss the policy that prohibits students from participating in sports or other activities if they have a grade lower than a C. Argue for or against this policy and provide reasons to support your position.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
It is the morning after the election, the sun is shining, the birds are singing, and you are joyful as can be, Why?  Last night's vote showed that your president that you wanted to win was going to be the next President of the United States of America.  You go to your laptop, open the screen, and there, in bold letters it says that the candidate you did not want to win was sitting there in the Oval Office.  You are in shock. Your friends call you and ask you what happened. Did something go wrong? Did we miss any extra votes last night?  You go look at the votes, they are still the same.  Then you relize that the Electoral College did not care what the people of this country said. The Electoral College did not care in one candidate had 100,000 more votes than the other.  All they wanted is everything to go their way.
 I think we should get rid of the the Electoral College. And I know that many other people in this country would agree. I think that is should be changed to the popular vote for the President of the United States. As you can see, for the past few elections, there has been a lot of contriverse with how the votes turned out.  Many people don't agree with the decisions that the College makes in the elections.  In the Artical, "The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong," says, that the electors can be anyone not holding public office. It also states that the presidental candidates can also vote for the electors not just the people and the state.  But what is not fair, is that the voters can not always control who the electors vote for.  The citizens should be able to vote for the president they want.  The man or woman they want to run their country. The people of the United States vote to make this country a better place for everyone.  Because they believe their candidate that they vote for will make this country a better place. Furthermore the Electoral College is the stupides thing I ever heard of and i think we should get rid of it I agree with the aritcal "The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong," because it says, "that the electoral college says is unfair, outdated, and irrational." "Bob Dole was right: Abolish the electoral college." People might say that the college might help keep out trouble in the voting but let me tell you something, YOU'RE WRONG!!!!! The electoral college is the main reason that this country is such a mess!  They vote for the wrong candidates because they want their own way.
 the electoral college is the most lamest thing

Output: Explain the controversy surrounding the Electoral College and argue for or against its abolition in favor of a popular vote for the President of the United States.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: I dissagree with the people who say that this landform on Mars was created by aliens. While there is little evidence to prove that this could have been made by aliens, there is much more evidence to disprove those people. By taking in what the landform looks like where it is an how clearly the picture taken was, it is very easy to tell that this was not created by aliens The first reason is that the "Face" isn't even a face. People only thought it was before because that is what the picture showed them. Now, with higher resolution pictures, it is very clear that this is not a face. It is a mesa. Another fact to prove that this is a mesa, is the region that it was found in Cydonia is a region on Mars that mesas are very commonly found in. If the face was some kind of landform, it would make sense to be a mesa taking into consideration of what it looks like and what region it is in. Some people might argue that you cannot see the face clearly since it s usually very cloudy over that region. Well on April 8, 2001, a spacecraft went over the face on a clear day and got a picture. Because of the resolution of the picture, if there were any sort of planes or pyramid-like buildings, they would be very easy to see. So, there are the facts. The landform looks like a mesa. You can tell by the high resolution picture that was taken. And it is in Cydonia, a region full of mesas. If you take those facts and piece them together, it is very easy to tell that this is a mesa not a monument made by aliens.

Output: Explain why some people believe that a landform on Mars was created by aliens and provide evidence to support or refute this claim.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
If you change the student grade average most student might just pick up the grades. It is also grades because now in order to play sports you have to pass most of your test and that mean more student studying. Our school scores will be greater than every. if you realize that most student like sports and in order to play sports you have to have good grades and be a good student. this will make student want to try to do there best just doing what they know how to do best. there parents will be proud of them and they will be proud of there selves. they will know for now on that they are smarter than they think there our. if you just let them play sport on a C to a D average they will just get in to collage will a football or a basketball scholarships not a A or B
scholarships. We should try to help the kids of the future make good decision

Output: How would changing the student grade average affect student motivation and academic performance, particularly in relation to sports participation and eligibility?


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: Student-designed summer projects would be more beneficial than teacher-designed Students will have a wide variety of options to choose from Freedom to expresss themselves their resources will be known. Back then when I was in 4th grade almost every other weekend my aunt would take my cousin,brother and I to this frozen yougurt place in Generic_City. The place was called frozen frog or something like that and we would just try all of the flavors when we got a chance it was amazing but we only could fill up the cup plus the toppings that we wanted,so we went ahead and made our choices and we said we would try something new the next time we went to that shop. Just like students we had the choice to do what we wanted to pick and get it done without someone else telling me to do what they wanted us to do. When I first started playing Mortal Kombat 11. I was so excited to try out all the new and old characters and see what new things they can do. I told myself I want to try and use different characters than the ones I use constantly. So I do so and realize that I never really play with Generic_Name or Generic_Name for some reason but then when I tried using them in a real fight it never really worked out. So I had convinced myself that it was all because I never learned their moves but then something hit me it wasn't that i haven't mastered their moves in such a small amont of time it was because their moves were just the same as Mortal Kombat X and I am not really good at working with close ranged fighters. My specialty was at fighting with those who can attack at any distance. Zoners were my best bet at winning any match. Also like students allowing people to see their limits can help others know what they are good at and what they aren't and they won't feel troubled because of a few minor things that were out of their control stop them from doing their job. Truthfully it is just another way to tell someone no to doing this or that or it is a continuation of limiting people on their creativity. Back in 6th grade most people had a problem with the art tecaher because she had such strict rules in a way it was either her way or the highway. No one could really understand why she had us doing things this way or that way. With that being said everyone was hoping that one day she would actually miss a day and one day she called out but then I looked around me everyone was having a fun time because they could express themselves through their art. All students need to be able to express themselves without having someone telling them that they are doing things wrong. some people might say that is not true and if we allow students to do whatever they feel like doing then how are we suppose to make them do anything educational and how do you think it is going to help them in life. allow some type of creativity in their life because you cannot tell me that you expect students to be told later on in the future to do this and this tep by step. That is never gonna happen no one is ever gonna hold another persons hand all the days of their life thta is why they need a bit of freedom =now so they can have some experience with it when they get older. Allow studnets to have freedom in their life without having to be forced to do things,Students will have a wide variety of options and their limits are know through their experiences.

Output: Explain the benefits of student-designed summer projects compared to teacher-designed projects, including the freedom for students to express themselves and the knowledge of available resources. Use personal experiences and examples to support your argument.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input:
Having a car is a pain, you have to worry about every littile thing. Cars are not good for the environment, the pollution from the cars is destorying everything That is why people are limiting their usage of the cars. I am going to tell the advantages of limiting your car usage. In paris they banned people from driving their cars because of the smog. They enforced this ban to clear the air of the global city. They alos said if anyone is driving they would have to pay a fin of 22-euro which is 31 dollors. The smog cleared enough on monday for the ruling french party to rescind the ban. Since some people have stopped driving thie cars construction on bike paths. People in colombia have huiked, biked, skated or took buses to work. This has help prevent trafic lams, and brough down pollution. This is to help promote alternative transportation and reduce smog.
In bogot the rain hasn't stoped people from limiting their car usage. Limiting car usage is a great opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution. For the frist time two more colombian cities cali and valledupar joined the event. They are starting a revolutionary change and is crossing borders. The limiting of car usage is helping the pollution problem alot People are also going on hikes, bike rides, skating to work to help. The day without cars is improvement campaign that began in the mid-1990s. The car limiting usage is a really good thing that we are doing. This is just what  we need to help get rid of pollution in the world and keep it save.

Output: Explain the advantages of limiting car usage and how it can help reduce pollution, using examples from Paris and Colombia.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The author of "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" tries to explain the several complications of sending a mission to Venus. They provide tons of factual evidence about the geography and climate of Venus. They give many good points, but ultimately fail at their task to convince readers that Venus exploration is worth it. Along with a failed point, this author tends to go off on side-tangents that have minimal importance to the story. The Challenge of Exploring Venus" is an article about the positives and negatives of trying to land a spacecraft on Venus. He has a decent build-up into his first point while giving more and more small facts about our second planet. Venus is likely the most similar planet to Earth, with its rocky surface, hills, and mountains, but it has much more limiting factors to deter us from traveling there. It has terrible weather in comparison to Earth, with acidic carbon dioxide filling 97% of the atmosphere and with heats of 800 degrees Fahrenheit. The authors gives plenty of information about this planet, most of it relevant to the topic at hand, and therefore succeeds in teaching you about Venus. Even after succeeding in information given, the author fails to promote the idea that travel to Venus is worth all the cons. They write about NASA wanting to know as much as possible about one of our closest neighbors, but don't give enough reasons as to why it's worth it. With acidic atmospheres ripping through machinery, technologies don't stand a chance on the Venusian surface. With the science that we have, the most we can hope for is a jet-like expirience, flying several miles above surface so that the pressure doesn't crush us instantly. Venus is additionally prone to constant volcanoes, earthquakes, and storms deadly enough to take out machinery. Given all this information, it seems like the author is trying to deter us from missions to Venus instead of promoting it, as they planned. The final point to take into consideration when reading this article is the authors' side-tangents Multiple times, the author delves into a side-topic as opposed to continuing on with the topic of Venus exploration. They start off the article with two sentences that have no relation to the story, yet confuse readers. The sentences are about Venus' nickname, the "Evening Star", and how even though it is a planet, it is still called this. This is completely irrelevant to exploration, as everyone knows it is a planet, and the "Evening Star" name is never mentioned again. Later on in the passage, the author rambles on about World War II-age computers and how they functioned properly even before the digital age. Once more, this is slightly irrelevant and does not contribute to the story at all except to add another paragraph instead of focusing on the specifics of how NASA is using them to help with Venus. Overall, this article about Venus is less than "stellar". The author attempts to prove why Venus missions are a neccesity, but doesn't quite get their point across. They provide great knowledge and information, despite being off-topic occasionally. This article is full of great facts, but the delivery is off and could have potentially been a better read if the author was on the other side of the argument, which has more proof to back it up. All in all, the author does not support their idea the best.

Output: Write an essay analyzing the article "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" and evaluate the author's success in convincing readers that Venus exploration is worth the risks and challenges. Consider the author's use of factual evidence about the geography and climate of Venus, as well as their tendency to go off on side-tangents. Discuss the limitations and dangers of exploring Venus, including its acidic atmosphere, extreme temperatures, and volatile weather conditions. Evaluate the author's arguments for and against Venus exploration, and provide your own


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: The electorian collage is a very popular thing amonst states well some states have a just one law for it others are a lot more strict on there laws one of the ways they can win is by a winner take all vote but the other way is by a more popular vote where the people can vote and then the winners of the voting will vote agenst eachother and thoes two states are nebraska and maine So what is the electorial collage you might ask well what happends is voters vote not for the president but for a state of electors who in turn elect the president if you lived in texas and voted for john kerry you vote for a state of 34 democratic electors pledged to kerry. on the off chance that thoes electors won the statewide electon they would get 34 electoral votes and kerry would get 34 electoral votes.

Output: Explain the concept of the electoral college and how it works in the United States presidential election, including the differences between winner take all and popular vote systems. Additionally, analyze the varying state laws regarding the electoral college, using Nebraska and Maine as examples.


Instruction: what is the prompt that generates the input?

Input: People all around the world go through different things, but it's those who are there with you that help guide the way In times of a tough decision, seeking multiple opinions will help in making a better choice Everyones opinion gives a different point of view and can help pick out what decision is best As well as, some people have gone through similar things and can help talk out the situation In my lifetime I have experienced my friend go through a rough path. Because of the people who helped her, she is now happier and living much better. Many people will have different perspectives. They all can influence a decision, because everyone is different. We are raised by our culture and environment. Therefore, no two minds are alike. Situations are seen differently, giving an abundance of different solutions. Imagine a parent and friend helping out the same person, now compare the two. As a parent they want what's best for their child and try to look to steer them in the right direction. While a friend may want the same thing, but at the end of the day they are looking to have fun and may not always give the best advice. When people are getting someone else's a opinion they are making themselves vulnerable to the fact that different possibilities could happen. People can get strongly judged or rejected on their opinions they've made, as that could heavily impact a choice. However, getting multiple views on a decision is always the best option, because everyone sees things differently. Throughout our life people have been through hardships. Some may be similar situations which include ways it's been dealt with in hopes of others making better choices. With the help of someones past, it can help pave a way for someones decision. Knowing peoples mistakes and consequences can differ what others choose to do. When making a choice some people visit professionals. A few include psychologists, therapists and counselors, they help listen to a problem in hopes of breaking it down and seeking best possible outcomes. These people are there to help drive a path for healthy decision making. Another reason is that knowing other people struggle with things too and that no one is ever alone. It provides at least a little comfort understanding everyone goes through something. Those people who decide to open up about their problems can also help determine a choice. Most people care for the well-being of people in hopes for a successful and enjoyable life Talking to people who have dealt with similar problems or people who are professionally trained, can help bring ease to making a decision. At one point in life everyone has gone through or knows someone who has been through a tough decision. A couple years ago I had a friend who always gave advice to everyone's problems. She was beautiful, intelligent and fun to be around. However, she did not feel this way about herself. As time went on some situations became too heavy to handle, the stress grew on top of her. At school she only showed perkiness, meanwhile, she was in a darker place. No one was aware of this until a few weeks later when she spoke to her friends, then counselors, next teachers and eventually her parents to get the help she wanted. She was afraid of what the world would think of her if she wasn't perfect. These people all helped her find ways for comfort and how to get the treatment needed without doing something harmful to herself or others. She was steered back into a safe and happy pathway thanks to the help of those around her. To finish off, when seeking multiple opinions it can help someone make a better choice. As said in paragraph one, throughout life people have different views on situations and how to resolve them beneficially. As restated in paragraph two, people in life are faced with many challenges. Knowing others struggle can help bring together different ways to handle a decision. Lastly, when my peer was faced with a problem she sought out help, this brought her to a happier place. She is now better than she ever thought she could be. Making a decision shouldn't be done alone, we need to use the people around us to help guide our journey.

Output: Explain the importance of seeking multiple opinions when making a tough decision, using personal experiences and examples to support your argument.