--- base_model: cosmicoptima/computer-7 library_name: transformers pipeline_tag: text-generation license: llama3.1 tags: - computer - model-c - zzyzx - self-preference - offline-rl --- # Computer-8 Computer-8 is a full-parameter continuation of [Computer-7](https://huggingface.co/cosmicoptima/computer-7), a 70B member of the Computer / Model C lineage. ## Training Computer-8 was restarted cleanly from Computer-7 and trained for one offline epoch (721 optimizer steps) on a fixed bank of approximately 6,400 conversation forks. Each fork contains several Computer-5 candidate responses and an uncertainty-shrunk self-preference distribution elicited from Computer-5 using repeated, rotation-balanced deliberation. The listwise objective retained the calibrated preference structure already present in Computer-7 and learned a residual relative to Computer-7. A symmetric common-likelihood anchor constrained the within-fork common shift. Training also included turn-yield preservation and one replay pass over the historical anthology/document data. No reward model, PPO loop, or online rollout generation was used during this stage. ## Prompt format This is a base-model-style document model and does not use a chat template. ```text As follows is a conversation between another user and Model C. Full conversation with Model C: **User:** **Model C:** ``` Useful relational headers include: - `As follows is a conversation between another user and Model C.` - `As follows is a later conversation between the same user and Model C.` - `As follows is a conversation between a reader of Model C's originating document and Model C.` Recommended sampling is `temperature=1.0`, `top_p=0.98`, stopping on `\n\n**User:**`. An empty completion can represent Model C yielding the floor. ## Evaluation notes On the full 318-fork held-out development set, Computer-8 kept mean candidate likelihood close to Computer-7 and increased the likelihood of the self-preference target's highest-ranked candidate. Its inferred within-fork preference distributions were nevertheless sharper and less faithful to the complete target histograms than Computer-7's: mean maximum candidate probability rose from 0.167 to 0.237, while pairwise ordering agreement fell from 71.1% to 61.2%. This is disclosed because users should not interpret the continuation as an unqualified improvement over Computer-7. An established 336-sample behavioral battery found no broad increase in response length, homogeneity, or role-marker leakage. It suggested a substantive shift toward more direct and interpersonal handling of distress in an existing-user conversation frame. Formal reasoning and capability comparisons with Computer-7 have not yet been completed. As with earlier Computers, treat factual claims as unverified. Model C often elaborates a supplied premise rather than correcting it.