{"id": "syn-u000003-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo is not litigated. Zdenek is litigated. Zdenek has roadside assistance. Viggo has roadside assistance. Viggo is bundled. Viggo has a claim frequency of 27.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also is uninsurable. Clause 2: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also is subrogated. Clause 3: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is a claimant. Clause 4: once any policyholder is not litigated, it also is grandfathered. Clause 5: once any policyholder has no roadside assistance, it also has a premium discount. Clause 6: once any policyholder is not bundled, it also has a dashcam. Clause 7: once any policyholder has a claim frequency of 12 or less, it also is not disputed. Clause 8: once any policyholder has no deductible waiver, it also is reimbursed. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has flood coverage. Question: Which of these is true of Viggo?", "options": ["is uninsurable", "is subrogated", "is reimbursed", "has a premium discount", "has a dashcam"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is subrogated", "unit_id": "u000003", "pair_id": "u000003-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000003-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "93e5d174fe97d36a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a10", "a5", "a0", "a2", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000003-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo is litigated. Zdenek is litigated. Zdenek has roadside assistance. Viggo has roadside assistance. Viggo is bundled. Viggo has a claim frequency of 27.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also is uninsurable. Clause 2: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also is subrogated. Clause 3: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is a claimant. Clause 4: once any policyholder is not litigated, it also is grandfathered. Clause 5: once any policyholder has no roadside assistance, it also has a premium discount. Clause 6: once any policyholder is not bundled, it also has a dashcam. Clause 7: once any policyholder has a claim frequency of 12 or less, it also is not disputed. Clause 8: once any policyholder has no deductible waiver, it also is reimbursed. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has flood coverage. Question: Which of these is true of Viggo?", "options": ["is uninsurable", "is subrogated", "is reimbursed", "has a premium discount", "has a dashcam"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is subrogated", "unit_id": "u000003", "pair_id": "u000003-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000003-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "907909f5bb2956e8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a10", "a5", "a0", "a2", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000020-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is not a veteran. Lotte has no mentor. Sigrid has a mentor. Petra has no mentor. Sigrid has a visa. Petra has a portfolio. Lotte has a visa. Mads has no background screening. Sigrid has no portfolio. Sigrid is fingerprinted. Sigrid is a veteran. Lotte is recommended. Sigrid is recommended. Mads has no mentor. Sigrid has a background screening. Mads is not recommended.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is fingerprinted, so it is seasoned. No. 2 While the given candidate has a background screening, so it is not freelance. No. 3 While the given candidate is fingerprinted and likewise is a veteran, so it is certified. No. 4 While the given candidate is certified and likewise is a veteran and likewise is seasoned, so it is onboarded. No. 5 While the given candidate is certified and likewise is a veteran and likewise is not recommended, so it is not onboarded. No. 6 While the given candidate has a mentor and likewise is a veteran, so it is not headhunted. No. 7 While the given candidate is a veteran and likewise has a portfolio, so it is not certified. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a visa. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is a veteran. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given candidate is recommended. No. 7 wins over No. 3. No. 4 wins over No. 5. Question: Is the claim \"Sigrid is onboarded\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000020", "pair_id": "u000020-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000020-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0814a00b0ae2b0a7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u000020-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is not a veteran. Lotte has no mentor. Sigrid has a mentor. Petra has no mentor. Sigrid has a visa. Petra has a portfolio. Lotte has a visa. Mads has no background screening. Sigrid has no portfolio. Sigrid is fingerprinted. Sigrid is a veteran. Lotte is recommended. Sigrid is recommended. Mads has no mentor. Sigrid has a background screening. Mads is not recommended.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is fingerprinted, so it is seasoned. No. 2 While the given candidate has a background screening, so it is not freelance. No. 3 While the given candidate is fingerprinted and likewise is a veteran, so it is certified. No. 4 While the given candidate is certified and likewise is a veteran and likewise is seasoned, so it is onboarded. No. 5 While the given candidate is certified and likewise is a veteran and likewise is recommended, so it is not onboarded. No. 6 While the given candidate has a mentor and likewise is a veteran, so it is not headhunted. No. 7 While the given candidate is a veteran and likewise has a portfolio, so it is not certified. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a visa. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is a veteran. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given candidate is recommended. No. 7 wins over No. 3. No. 4 wins over No. 5. Question: Is the claim \"Sigrid is onboarded\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000020", "pair_id": "u000020-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000020-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "205c66226d4327ad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u000068-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not consolidated. Nandor is rerouted. Ulla is rerouted. Mirela is rerouted. Mirela is not consolidated. Nandor is not consolidated. Ulla has a waybill.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is misrouted provided that it is not rerouted. Section 2: a parcel is not hazardous provided that it has a waybill. Section 3: a parcel is hazardous provided that it is consolidated. Section 4: a parcel is damaged provided that it is not consolidated. Section 5: a parcel has no barcode provided that it has no waybill. Question: Nandor is not hazardous. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000068", "pair_id": "u000068-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000068-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "f110ad49d5b9f609", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000068-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not consolidated. Nandor is not rerouted. Ulla is rerouted. Mirela is rerouted. Mirela is not consolidated. Nandor is not consolidated. Ulla has a waybill.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is misrouted provided that it is not rerouted. Section 2: a parcel is not hazardous provided that it has a waybill. Section 3: a parcel is hazardous provided that it is consolidated. Section 4: a parcel is damaged provided that it is not consolidated. Section 5: a parcel has no barcode provided that it has no waybill. Question: Nandor is not hazardous. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000068", "pair_id": "u000068-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000068-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "c168779e2e916e61", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000099-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon has a GPU. Halcyon is not virtualized. Halcyon is containerized. Halcyon is mirrored. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 29. Halcyon has a snapshot.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is idle and further is mirrored and further is containerized, it thereby is deprecated. Point B. If said workload is sharded, it thereby is not idle. Point C. If said workload is deprecated and further has a memory allotment of maximum 54, it thereby is throttled. Point D. If said workload is deprecated and further has a memory allotment of maximum 54, it thereby is not throttled. Point E. If said workload is containerized and further is virtualized, it thereby is not deprecated. Point F. If said workload is mirrored, it thereby is not patched. Point G. If said workload has a GPU and further is sharded and further is virtualized, it thereby is patched. Point H. If said workload has a snapshot and further has a memory allotment of minimum 27, it thereby is idle. Point F supersedes Point G. Point A supersedes Point E. Point H supersedes Point B. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Halcyon is throttled. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000099", "pair_id": "u000099-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000099-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "33135930f60184c9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000099-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon has a GPU. Halcyon is not virtualized. Halcyon is containerized. Halcyon is mirrored. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 29. Halcyon has a snapshot.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is idle and further is mirrored and further is containerized, it thereby is deprecated. Point B. If said workload is sharded, it thereby is not idle. Point C. If said workload is deprecated and further has a memory allotment in excess of 54, it thereby is throttled. Point D. If said workload is deprecated and further has a memory allotment of maximum 54, it thereby is not throttled. Point E. If said workload is containerized and further is virtualized, it thereby is not deprecated. Point F. If said workload is mirrored, it thereby is not patched. Point G. If said workload has a GPU and further is sharded and further is virtualized, it thereby is patched. Point H. If said workload has a snapshot and further has a memory allotment of minimum 27, it thereby is idle. Point F supersedes Point G. Point A supersedes Point E. Point H supersedes Point B. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Halcyon is throttled. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000099", "pair_id": "u000099-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000099-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7378458b491dddd8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000182-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna is sponsored. Jasna is bilingual. Jasna is onboarded. Noor is bilingual. Noor has a seniority step of 61.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not headhunted provided that it has an aptitude quotient of 53 or lower. Section 2: a candidate is certified provided that it has a seniority step of 70 or lower as well as is onboarded as well as is sponsored. Section 3: a candidate is headhunted provided that it is bilingual. Section 4: a candidate is not certified provided that it has a seniority step of 70 or lower as well as has an aptitude quotient of 67 or higher. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Jasna is not certified. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000182", "pair_id": "u000182-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000182-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "16f6d203c729fe75", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000182-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has a seniority step of 63. Jasna is sponsored. Jasna is bilingual. Jasna is onboarded. Noor is bilingual. Noor has a seniority step of 61.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not headhunted provided that it has an aptitude quotient of 53 or lower. Section 2: a candidate is certified provided that it has a seniority step of 70 or lower as well as is onboarded as well as is sponsored. Section 3: a candidate is headhunted provided that it is bilingual. Section 4: a candidate is not certified provided that it has a seniority step of 70 or lower as well as has an aptitude quotient of 67 or higher. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Jasna is not certified. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000182", "pair_id": "u000182-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000182-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c99a4b4c7e4e3632", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000182-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna is sponsored. Jasna is bilingual. Jasna is onboarded. Noor is bilingual. Noor has a seniority step of 61.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has an aptitude quotient no higher than 53: then it is not headhunted. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step no higher than 70 plus is onboarded plus is sponsored: then it is certified. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is bilingual: then it is headhunted. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step no higher than 70 plus has an aptitude quotient no lower than 67: then it is not certified. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. Question: Is it so that Jasna is not certified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000182", "pair_id": "u000182-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000182-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "16f6d203c729fe75", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000182-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has a seniority step of 63. Jasna is sponsored. Jasna is bilingual. Jasna is onboarded. Noor is bilingual. Noor has a seniority step of 61.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has an aptitude quotient no higher than 53: then it is not headhunted. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step no higher than 70 plus is onboarded plus is sponsored: then it is certified. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is bilingual: then it is headhunted. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step no higher than 70 plus has an aptitude quotient no lower than 67: then it is not certified. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. Question: Is it so that Jasna is not certified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000182", "pair_id": "u000182-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000182-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c99a4b4c7e4e3632", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000182-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna is sponsored. Jasna is bilingual. Jasna is onboarded. Noor is bilingual. Noor has a seniority step of 61.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient of 53 or below, it then is not headhunted. #2 Each time a candidate has a seniority step of 70 or below and additionally is onboarded and additionally is sponsored, it then is certified. #3 Each time a candidate is bilingual, it then is headhunted. #4 Each time a candidate has a seniority step of 70 or below and additionally has an aptitude quotient of 67 or above, it then is not certified. #3 yields to #1. #2 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Jasna is not certified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000182", "pair_id": "u000182-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000182-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "16f6d203c729fe75", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000182-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has a seniority step of 63. Jasna is sponsored. Jasna is bilingual. Jasna is onboarded. Noor is bilingual. Noor has a seniority step of 61.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient of 53 or below, it then is not headhunted. #2 Each time a candidate has a seniority step of 70 or below and additionally is onboarded and additionally is sponsored, it then is certified. #3 Each time a candidate is bilingual, it then is headhunted. #4 Each time a candidate has a seniority step of 70 or below and additionally has an aptitude quotient of 67 or above, it then is not certified. #3 yields to #1. #2 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Jasna is not certified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000182", "pair_id": "u000182-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000182-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c99a4b4c7e4e3632", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000237-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not delinquent. Wiebke is not vetted. Folke is not underwritten. Folke is bankrupt. Folke is vetted. Greta is not underwritten. Folke is not pensioned. Wiebke is not underwritten.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is vetted while is not delinquent while is not underwritten, thus it is not creditworthy. Provision 2: when the borrower here is bankrupt while is delinquent, thus it is solvent. Provision 3: when the borrower here is vetted while is not delinquent while is not underwritten, thus it is creditworthy. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here is not delinquent while is underwritten. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here is pensioned. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Folke is creditworthy?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000237", "pair_id": "u000237-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000237-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "076124988c861ada", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000237-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not delinquent. Wiebke is not vetted. Folke is not underwritten. Folke is bankrupt. Folke is vetted. Greta is not underwritten. Folke is not pensioned. Wiebke is not underwritten.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is vetted while is delinquent while is not underwritten, thus it is not creditworthy. Provision 2: when the borrower here is bankrupt while is delinquent, thus it is solvent. Provision 3: when the borrower here is vetted while is not delinquent while is not underwritten, thus it is creditworthy. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here is not delinquent while is underwritten. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here is pensioned. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Folke is creditworthy?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000237", "pair_id": "u000237-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000237-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b9d7e045e2589619", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000237-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not delinquent. Wiebke is not vetted. Folke is not underwritten. Folke is bankrupt. Folke is vetted. Greta is not underwritten. Folke is not pensioned. Wiebke is not underwritten.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is vetted and likewise is not delinquent and likewise is not underwritten, so it is not creditworthy. No. 2 While the given borrower is bankrupt and likewise is delinquent, so it is solvent. No. 3 While the given borrower is vetted and likewise is not delinquent and likewise is not underwritten, so it is creditworthy. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given borrower is not delinquent and likewise is underwritten. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given borrower is pensioned. No. 1 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Folke is creditworthy\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000237", "pair_id": "u000237-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000237-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "076124988c861ada", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000237-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not delinquent. Wiebke is not vetted. Folke is not underwritten. Folke is bankrupt. Folke is vetted. Greta is not underwritten. Folke is not pensioned. Wiebke is not underwritten.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is vetted and likewise is delinquent and likewise is not underwritten, so it is not creditworthy. No. 2 While the given borrower is bankrupt and likewise is delinquent, so it is solvent. No. 3 While the given borrower is vetted and likewise is not delinquent and likewise is not underwritten, so it is creditworthy. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given borrower is not delinquent and likewise is underwritten. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given borrower is pensioned. No. 1 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Folke is creditworthy\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000237", "pair_id": "u000237-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000237-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b9d7e045e2589619", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000238-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas is not foreclosed. Tomas is not bankrupt. Tomas is amortized. Tomas is a depositor.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has an escrow account, it thereby has no lien. Point B. If said borrower is bankrupt, it thereby is pensioned. Point C. If said borrower has an escrow account, it thereby has a lien. Point D. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby has no escrow account. Point E. If said borrower is a depositor, it thereby is underwritten. Point F. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby has an escrow account. Point C is cancelled if said borrower is foreclosed. Point A is cancelled if said borrower is foreclosed. Point B is cancelled if said borrower is amortized. Point C is cancelled if said borrower is audited. Point F supersedes Point D. Point C supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Tomas has a lien. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000238", "pair_id": "u000238-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000238-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "10d70eede656b7b7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u000238-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas is not foreclosed. Tomas is not bankrupt. Tomas is amortized. Tomas is a depositor. Tomas is audited.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has an escrow account, it thereby has no lien. Point B. If said borrower is bankrupt, it thereby is pensioned. Point C. If said borrower has an escrow account, it thereby has a lien. Point D. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby has no escrow account. Point E. If said borrower is a depositor, it thereby is underwritten. Point F. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby has an escrow account. Point C is cancelled if said borrower is foreclosed. Point A is cancelled if said borrower is foreclosed. Point B is cancelled if said borrower is amortized. Point C is cancelled if said borrower is audited. Point F supersedes Point D. Point C supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Tomas has a lien. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000238", "pair_id": "u000238-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000238-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1da543b93ec20ced", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u000246-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia has a mobility rank of 57. Dorian is not postoperative. Dorian is symptomatic. Xenia is not postoperative.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is postoperative, it also is asthmatic. Clause 2: once any patient has a mobility rank of 60 or more, it also is vaccinated. Clause 3: once any patient is vaccinated, it also has no chaperone. Clause 4: once any patient is not symptomatic, it also is waitlisted. Clause 5: once any patient is waitlisted, it also has a chaperone. Question: Does it follow that Xenia has a chaperone?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000246", "pair_id": "u000246-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000246-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d2631bc6fa7de4c0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000246-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia has a mobility rank of 57. Dorian is not postoperative. Dorian is symptomatic. Xenia is not postoperative.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is not postoperative, it also is asthmatic. Clause 2: once any patient has a mobility rank of 60 or more, it also is vaccinated. Clause 3: once any patient is vaccinated, it also has no chaperone. Clause 4: once any patient is not symptomatic, it also is waitlisted. Clause 5: once any patient is waitlisted, it also has a chaperone. Question: Does it follow that Xenia has a chaperone?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000246", "pair_id": "u000246-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000246-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "9c5465d3c5ad771b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000269-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste has no deductible waiver. Xaver has roadside assistance. Celeste has roadside assistance. Wanda is reinstated. Edda is not reinstated. Wanda is not litigated. Xaver has a deductible waiver. Xaver is not reinstated. Wanda is not a smoker. Wanda has roadside assistance. Celeste has no flood coverage. Wanda has no deductible waiver. Edda has roadside assistance. Edda is not a smoker. Xaver has no flood coverage. Xaver is a smoker. Xaver is not litigated. Edda is not inspected. Celeste is not inspected.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is bundled, and has a deductible waiver, and is inspected, that policyholder is not reimbursed. Item B. When the policyholder has a deductible waiver, and is a smoker, and is inspected, that policyholder is not a claimant. Item C. When the policyholder is reinstated, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item D. When the policyholder has flood coverage, that policyholder is a claimant. Item E. When the policyholder is bundled, and has roadside assistance, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item F. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, and has a deductible waiver, that policyholder is bundled. Item B is suspended when the policyholder is litigated. Item E is suspended when the policyholder has flood coverage. Item C is suspended when the policyholder is litigated. Item A outranks Item E. Item B outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Xaver is not reimbursed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000269", "pair_id": "u000269-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/14", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000269-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "561b1a1451230863", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000269-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste has no deductible waiver. Xaver has roadside assistance. Celeste has roadside assistance. Wanda is reinstated. Edda is not reinstated. Wanda is not litigated. Xaver has a deductible waiver. Xaver is not reinstated. Wanda is not a smoker. Wanda has roadside assistance. Celeste has no flood coverage. Wanda has no deductible waiver. Edda has roadside assistance. Edda is not a smoker. Xaver is inspected. Xaver has no flood coverage. Xaver is a smoker. Xaver is not litigated. Edda is not inspected. Celeste is not inspected.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is bundled, and has a deductible waiver, and is inspected, that policyholder is not reimbursed. Item B. When the policyholder has a deductible waiver, and is a smoker, and is inspected, that policyholder is not a claimant. Item C. When the policyholder is reinstated, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item D. When the policyholder has flood coverage, that policyholder is a claimant. Item E. When the policyholder is bundled, and has roadside assistance, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item F. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, and has a deductible waiver, that policyholder is bundled. Item B is suspended when the policyholder is litigated. Item E is suspended when the policyholder has flood coverage. Item C is suspended when the policyholder is litigated. Item A outranks Item E. Item B outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Xaver is not reimbursed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000269", "pair_id": "u000269-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/14", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000269-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "33dc2326e8288599", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000305-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is not notarized. Talc has a lint backlog of 78. Obsidian has no changelog. Talc is not notarized. Talc has a migration script. Gneiss has no migration script. Obsidian has a lint backlog of 43. Gneiss is notarized.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is not reproducible. Policy II. Suppose that build is backported: then it is merged. Policy III. Suppose that build is not notarized: then it is not linted. Policy IV. Suppose that build has no migration script: then it is backported. Policy V. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is fuzzed. Policy VI. Suppose that build has a migration script: then it is not localized. Policy VII. Suppose that build is not localized: then it is documented. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is not reproducible: then it has a security advisory. Policy IX. Suppose that build is not notarized: then it is not versioned. Policy X. Suppose that build has no changelog: then it is experimental. Policy XI. Suppose that build has a lint backlog no higher than 15: then it is benchmarked. Question: Which choice is right for Talc?", "options": ["is documented", "is fuzzed", "is merged", "has a security advisory"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is documented", "unit_id": "u000305", "pair_id": "u000305-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000305-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "18aa7b812e2717e3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a12", "a13", "a6", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000305-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is not notarized. Talc has a lint backlog of 78. Obsidian has no changelog. Talc is notarized. Talc has a migration script. Gneiss has no migration script. Obsidian has a lint backlog of 43. Gneiss is notarized.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is not reproducible. Policy II. Suppose that build is backported: then it is merged. Policy III. Suppose that build is not notarized: then it is not linted. Policy IV. Suppose that build has no migration script: then it is backported. Policy V. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is fuzzed. Policy VI. Suppose that build has a migration script: then it is not localized. Policy VII. Suppose that build is not localized: then it is documented. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is not reproducible: then it has a security advisory. Policy IX. Suppose that build is not notarized: then it is not versioned. Policy X. Suppose that build has no changelog: then it is experimental. Policy XI. Suppose that build has a lint backlog no higher than 15: then it is benchmarked. Question: Which choice is right for Talc?", "options": ["is documented", "is fuzzed", "is merged", "has a security advisory"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is documented", "unit_id": "u000305", "pair_id": "u000305-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000305-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "993ea294277a0afe", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a12", "a13", "a6", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000314-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is covered. Celeste is not inspected. Celeste has no adjuster. Celeste is not uninsurable.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is not reimbursed, then it is indemnified. (2) If a policyholder is appraised, then it has roadside assistance. (3) If a policyholder is uninsurable, then it is not indemnified. (4) If a policyholder is not inspected, then it is not litigated. (5) If a policyholder is not covered, then it is grandfathered. (6) If a policyholder has no roadside assistance, then it is not a smoker. (7) If a policyholder has no roadside assistance, then it is a smoker. (8) If a policyholder is not grandfathered, then it has no roadside assistance. (9) If a policyholder is covered, then it is not grandfathered. (10) If a policyholder has an adjuster, then it is litigated. (7) is void if the policyholder is not appraised. (2) is void if the policyholder is reimbursed. (6) is void if the policyholder is appraised. (5) is void if the policyholder is covered. When (7) and (6) clash, (7) prevails. When (2) and (8) clash, (2) prevails. When (10) and (4) clash, (10) prevails. When (5) and (9) clash, (5) prevails. When (3) and (1) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Celeste is a smoker?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000314", "pair_id": "u000314-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000314-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6abc3aa7050ca393", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000314-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not appraised. Celeste is covered. Celeste is not inspected. Celeste has no adjuster. Celeste is not uninsurable.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is not reimbursed, then it is indemnified. (2) If a policyholder is appraised, then it has roadside assistance. (3) If a policyholder is uninsurable, then it is not indemnified. (4) If a policyholder is not inspected, then it is not litigated. (5) If a policyholder is not covered, then it is grandfathered. (6) If a policyholder has no roadside assistance, then it is not a smoker. (7) If a policyholder has no roadside assistance, then it is a smoker. (8) If a policyholder is not grandfathered, then it has no roadside assistance. (9) If a policyholder is covered, then it is not grandfathered. (10) If a policyholder has an adjuster, then it is litigated. (7) is void if the policyholder is not appraised. (2) is void if the policyholder is reimbursed. (6) is void if the policyholder is appraised. (5) is void if the policyholder is covered. When (7) and (6) clash, (7) prevails. When (2) and (8) clash, (2) prevails. When (10) and (4) clash, (10) prevails. When (5) and (9) clash, (5) prevails. When (3) and (1) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Celeste is a smoker?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000314", "pair_id": "u000314-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000314-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8a6596d4246d8e21", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000325-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is not postoperative. Florin has a pulse rate of 23. Aurel has a pulse rate of 68. Florin is pregnant. Wendel is not postoperative.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has a caregiver provided that it has a pulse rate exceeding 22. Section 2: a patient is contagious provided that it is asthmatic. Section 3: a patient is hypertensive provided that it is not pregnant. Section 4: a patient is not bedridden provided that it is not fasting. Section 5: a patient is not contagious provided that it is rescheduled. Section 6: a patient is not vaccinated provided that it is postoperative. Section 7: a patient is rescheduled provided that it is hypertensive. Section 8: a patient is asthmatic provided that it is not fasting. Section 9: a patient is not fasting provided that it has a pulse rate of 42 or higher. Question: Florin is contagious. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000325", "pair_id": "u000325-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000325-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5c66f08172b17acf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000325-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is not postoperative. Florin has a pulse rate of 23. Aurel has a pulse rate of 68. Florin is pregnant. Wendel is not postoperative.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has a caregiver provided that it has a pulse rate exceeding 88. Section 2: a patient is contagious provided that it is asthmatic. Section 3: a patient is hypertensive provided that it is not pregnant. Section 4: a patient is not bedridden provided that it is not fasting. Section 5: a patient is not contagious provided that it is rescheduled. Section 6: a patient is not vaccinated provided that it is postoperative. Section 7: a patient is rescheduled provided that it is hypertensive. Section 8: a patient is asthmatic provided that it is not fasting. Section 9: a patient is not fasting provided that it has a pulse rate of 42 or higher. Question: Florin is contagious. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000325", "pair_id": "u000325-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000325-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "c9da456661fa38b9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000325-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is not postoperative. Florin has a pulse rate of 23. Aurel has a pulse rate of 68. Florin is pregnant. Wendel is not postoperative.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has a pulse rate greater than 22, it then has a caregiver. #2 Each time a patient is asthmatic, it then is contagious. #3 Each time a patient is not pregnant, it then is hypertensive. #4 Each time a patient is not fasting, it then is not bedridden. #5 Each time a patient is rescheduled, it then is not contagious. #6 Each time a patient is postoperative, it then is not vaccinated. #7 Each time a patient is hypertensive, it then is rescheduled. #8 Each time a patient is not fasting, it then is asthmatic. #9 Each time a patient has a pulse rate of 42 or above, it then is not fasting. Question: Do the terms above show that Florin is contagious?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000325", "pair_id": "u000325-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000325-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5c66f08172b17acf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000325-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is not postoperative. Florin has a pulse rate of 23. Aurel has a pulse rate of 68. Florin is pregnant. Wendel is not postoperative.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has a pulse rate greater than 88, it then has a caregiver. #2 Each time a patient is asthmatic, it then is contagious. #3 Each time a patient is not pregnant, it then is hypertensive. #4 Each time a patient is not fasting, it then is not bedridden. #5 Each time a patient is rescheduled, it then is not contagious. #6 Each time a patient is postoperative, it then is not vaccinated. #7 Each time a patient is hypertensive, it then is rescheduled. #8 Each time a patient is not fasting, it then is asthmatic. #9 Each time a patient has a pulse rate of 42 or above, it then is not fasting. Question: Do the terms above show that Florin is contagious?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000325", "pair_id": "u000325-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000325-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "c9da456661fa38b9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000328-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not localized. Gneiss has a feature toggle. Quartz has a feature toggle. Gneiss is not localized. Gneiss is not benchmarked. Quartz is benchmarked. Quartz is documented.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is localized and has a feature toggle and is not benchmarked, then it is backported. Question: Is it true that Quartz is documented?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000328", "pair_id": "u000328-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000328-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "8a7ba08022d8d758", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000328-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not localized. Gneiss has a feature toggle. Quartz has no feature toggle. Gneiss is not localized. Gneiss is not benchmarked. Quartz is benchmarked. Quartz is documented.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is localized and has a feature toggle and is not benchmarked, then it is backported. Question: Is it true that Quartz is documented?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000328", "pair_id": "u000328-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000328-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "9d16a9e6e9ff92cc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000328-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not localized. Gneiss has a feature toggle. Quartz has a feature toggle. Gneiss is not localized. Gneiss is not benchmarked. Quartz is benchmarked. Quartz is documented.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is localized and also has a feature toggle and also is not benchmarked, it also is backported. Question: Does it follow that Quartz is documented?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000328", "pair_id": "u000328-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000328-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "8a7ba08022d8d758", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000328-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not localized. Gneiss has a feature toggle. Quartz has no feature toggle. Gneiss is not localized. Gneiss is not benchmarked. Quartz is benchmarked. Quartz is documented.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is localized and also has a feature toggle and also is not benchmarked, it also is backported. Question: Does it follow that Quartz is documented?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000328", "pair_id": "u000328-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000328-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "9d16a9e6e9ff92cc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000328-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not localized. Gneiss has a feature toggle. Quartz has a feature toggle. Gneiss is not localized. Gneiss is not benchmarked. Quartz is benchmarked. Quartz is documented.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is localized, and has a feature toggle, and is not benchmarked, that build is backported. Question: Can one infer that Quartz is documented?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000328", "pair_id": "u000328-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000328-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "8a7ba08022d8d758", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000328-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not localized. Gneiss has a feature toggle. Quartz has no feature toggle. Gneiss is not localized. Gneiss is not benchmarked. Quartz is benchmarked. Quartz is documented.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is localized, and has a feature toggle, and is not benchmarked, that build is backported. Question: Can one infer that Quartz is documented?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000328", "pair_id": "u000328-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000328-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "9d16a9e6e9ff92cc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000406-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is throttled. Borealis is not throttled. Borealis has a CPU quota of 5. Juno is backed up. Borealis is backed up. Juno is stateless. Nimbus has a CPU quota of 40. Juno has a CPU quota of 48.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is not backed up, then it is cached. (2) If a workload is cached, then it is idle. (3) If a workload is not stateless, then it is not isolated. (4) If a workload is throttled, then it is virtualized. (5) If a workload has a CPU quota of at most 24, then it is isolated. (6) If a workload is not mirrored, then it is not idle. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. When (2) and (6) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Juno is idle?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000406", "pair_id": "u000406-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000406-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1ebf282adaa23169", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000406-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is throttled. Borealis is not throttled. Borealis has a CPU quota of 5. Juno is backed up. Borealis is backed up. Juno is stateless. Nimbus has a CPU quota of 40. Juno has a CPU quota of 48.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is not backed up, then it is cached. (2) If a workload is backed up, then it is not mirrored. (3) If a workload is cached, then it is idle. (4) If a workload is not stateless, then it is not isolated. (5) If a workload is throttled, then it is virtualized. (6) If a workload has a CPU quota of at most 24, then it is isolated. (7) If a workload is not mirrored, then it is not idle. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (7) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Juno is idle?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000406", "pair_id": "u000406-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000406-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c25ec64e451498c9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000406-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is throttled. Borealis is not throttled. Borealis has a CPU quota of 5. Juno is backed up. Borealis is backed up. Juno is stateless. Nimbus has a CPU quota of 40. Juno has a CPU quota of 48.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is not backed up, that workload is cached. Item B. When the workload is cached, that workload is idle. Item C. When the workload is not stateless, that workload is not isolated. Item D. When the workload is throttled, that workload is virtualized. Item E. When the workload has a CPU quota of no more than 24, that workload is isolated. Item F. When the workload is not mirrored, that workload is not idle. Item C outranks Item E. Item B outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Juno is idle?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000406", "pair_id": "u000406-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000406-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1ebf282adaa23169", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000406-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is throttled. Borealis is not throttled. Borealis has a CPU quota of 5. Juno is backed up. Borealis is backed up. Juno is stateless. Nimbus has a CPU quota of 40. Juno has a CPU quota of 48.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is not backed up, that workload is cached. Item B. When the workload is backed up, that workload is not mirrored. Item C. When the workload is cached, that workload is idle. Item D. When the workload is not stateless, that workload is not isolated. Item E. When the workload is throttled, that workload is virtualized. Item F. When the workload has a CPU quota of no more than 24, that workload is isolated. Item G. When the workload is not mirrored, that workload is not idle. Item D outranks Item F. Item C outranks Item G. Question: Can one infer that Juno is idle?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000406", "pair_id": "u000406-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000406-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c25ec64e451498c9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000421-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is indemnified. Xaver has flood coverage. Xaver is not reinstated. Wanda is reinstated. Wanda has no flood coverage. Xaver is not reimbursed. Xaver is appraised. Xaver is bundled. Wanda is not appraised.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is retired while has a premium discount while is reimbursed, thus it is not a smoker. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is retired while is indemnified while is bundled, thus it is a smoker. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is bundled while has flood coverage, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is appraised while is not reinstated while has flood coverage, thus it has a rider. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is grandfathered while has flood coverage, thus it is retired. Question: Would it be right to say that Xaver is not a smoker?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000421", "pair_id": "u000421-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000421-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "10c49b3dea9a3ef7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000421-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is indemnified. Xaver has flood coverage. Xaver is not reinstated. Wanda is reinstated. Wanda has no flood coverage. Xaver is not reimbursed. Xaver is appraised. Xaver is bundled. Wanda is not appraised.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is retired while has a premium discount while is reimbursed, thus it is not a smoker. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is retired while is indemnified while is bundled, thus it is a smoker. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is bundled while has flood coverage, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is appraised while is reinstated while has flood coverage, thus it has a rider. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is grandfathered while has flood coverage, thus it is retired. Question: Would it be right to say that Xaver is not a smoker?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000421", "pair_id": "u000421-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000421-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "b930bef6aa5b20fe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000421-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is indemnified. Xaver has flood coverage. Xaver is not reinstated. Wanda is reinstated. Wanda has no flood coverage. Xaver is not reimbursed. Xaver is appraised. Xaver is bundled. Wanda is not appraised.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is retired and further has a premium discount and further is reimbursed, it thereby is not a smoker. Point B. If said policyholder is retired and further is indemnified and further is bundled, it thereby is a smoker. Point C. If said policyholder is bundled and further has flood coverage, it thereby is grandfathered. Point D. If said policyholder is appraised and further is not reinstated and further has flood coverage, it thereby has a rider. Point E. If said policyholder is grandfathered and further has flood coverage, it thereby is retired. Question: Statement: Xaver is not a smoker. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000421", "pair_id": "u000421-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000421-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "10c49b3dea9a3ef7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000421-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is indemnified. Xaver has flood coverage. Xaver is not reinstated. Wanda is reinstated. Wanda has no flood coverage. Xaver is not reimbursed. Xaver is appraised. Xaver is bundled. Wanda is not appraised.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is retired and further has a premium discount and further is reimbursed, it thereby is not a smoker. Point B. If said policyholder is retired and further is indemnified and further is bundled, it thereby is a smoker. Point C. If said policyholder is bundled and further has flood coverage, it thereby is grandfathered. Point D. If said policyholder is appraised and further is reinstated and further has flood coverage, it thereby has a rider. Point E. If said policyholder is grandfathered and further has flood coverage, it thereby is retired. Question: Statement: Xaver is not a smoker. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000421", "pair_id": "u000421-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000421-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "b930bef6aa5b20fe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000421-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is indemnified. Xaver has flood coverage. Xaver is not reinstated. Wanda is reinstated. Wanda has no flood coverage. Xaver is not reimbursed. Xaver is appraised. Xaver is bundled. Wanda is not appraised.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is retired and likewise has a premium discount and likewise is reimbursed, so it is not a smoker. No. 2 While the given policyholder is retired and likewise is indemnified and likewise is bundled, so it is a smoker. No. 3 While the given policyholder is bundled and likewise has flood coverage, so it is grandfathered. No. 4 While the given policyholder is appraised and likewise is not reinstated and likewise has flood coverage, so it has a rider. No. 5 While the given policyholder is grandfathered and likewise has flood coverage, so it is retired. Question: Is the claim \"Xaver is not a smoker\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000421", "pair_id": "u000421-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000421-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "10c49b3dea9a3ef7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000421-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is indemnified. Xaver has flood coverage. Xaver is not reinstated. Wanda is reinstated. Wanda has no flood coverage. Xaver is not reimbursed. Xaver is appraised. Xaver is bundled. Wanda is not appraised.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is retired and likewise has a premium discount and likewise is reimbursed, so it is not a smoker. No. 2 While the given policyholder is retired and likewise is indemnified and likewise is bundled, so it is a smoker. No. 3 While the given policyholder is bundled and likewise has flood coverage, so it is grandfathered. No. 4 While the given policyholder is appraised and likewise is reinstated and likewise has flood coverage, so it has a rider. No. 5 While the given policyholder is grandfathered and likewise has flood coverage, so it is retired. Question: Is the claim \"Xaver is not a smoker\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000421", "pair_id": "u000421-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000421-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "b930bef6aa5b20fe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000443-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is flaky. Schist is flaky. Schist has a feature toggle. Mica is not notarized. Schist is not notarized. Mica is not localized. Obsidian is not notarized. Schist is localized. Schist is documented. Schist is not obsolete. Mica is flaky. Mica is documented.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is minified and is localized, then it is not backported. (2) If a build is documented and is not flaky, then it is fuzzed. (3) If a build is minified and is obsolete, then it is backported. (4) If a build is notarized and has a feature toggle, then it is minified. Question: Is it true that Schist is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000443", "pair_id": "u000443-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000443-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "70c085ffea97b33a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000443-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is flaky. Schist is flaky. Schist has a feature toggle. Mica is not notarized. Schist is not notarized. Mica is not localized. Obsidian is not notarized. Schist is localized. Schist is documented. Schist is not obsolete. Mica is flaky. Mica is documented.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is minified and is localized, then it is not backported. (2) If a build is documented and is flaky, then it is fuzzed. (3) If a build is minified and is obsolete, then it is backported. (4) If a build is notarized and has a feature toggle, then it is minified. Question: Is it true that Schist is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000443", "pair_id": "u000443-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000443-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "b7487c0f0df7a0c0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000443-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is flaky. Schist is flaky. Schist has a feature toggle. Mica is not notarized. Schist is not notarized. Mica is not localized. Obsidian is not notarized. Schist is localized. Schist is documented. Schist is not obsolete. Mica is flaky. Mica is documented.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is minified, and is localized, that build is not backported. Item B. When the build is documented, and is not flaky, that build is fuzzed. Item C. When the build is minified, and is obsolete, that build is backported. Item D. When the build is notarized, and has a feature toggle, that build is minified. Question: Can one infer that Schist is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000443", "pair_id": "u000443-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000443-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "70c085ffea97b33a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000443-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is flaky. Schist is flaky. Schist has a feature toggle. Mica is not notarized. Schist is not notarized. Mica is not localized. Obsidian is not notarized. Schist is localized. Schist is documented. Schist is not obsolete. Mica is flaky. Mica is documented.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is minified, and is localized, that build is not backported. Item B. When the build is documented, and is flaky, that build is fuzzed. Item C. When the build is minified, and is obsolete, that build is backported. Item D. When the build is notarized, and has a feature toggle, that build is minified. Question: Can one infer that Schist is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000443", "pair_id": "u000443-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000443-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "b7487c0f0df7a0c0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000462-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has a credit rating of 34. Folke is solvent. Corin has a mortgage. Folke is not a homeowner. Corin is not delinquent. Ilse is not solvent. Folke has a credit rating of 31. Ilse is a homeowner. Folke is not delinquent. Ilse has a credit rating of 61. Corin is not solvent. Folke has no mortgage.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has no mortgage, it thereby is vetted. Point B. If said borrower has collateral, it thereby is amortized. Point C. If said borrower is solvent, it thereby is garnished. Point D. If said borrower has collateral, it thereby is not amortized. Point E. If said borrower is vetted, it thereby has collateral. Point F. If said borrower has a credit rating of minimum 13, it thereby is not vetted. Point G. If said borrower is not a homeowner, it thereby is not garnished. Point D is cancelled if said borrower is delinquent. Point B is cancelled if said borrower is not solvent. Point B is cancelled if said borrower has a repayment grade of minimum 18. Point D is cancelled if said borrower is solvent. Point D supersedes Point B. Point A supersedes Point F. Point G supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Folke is amortized. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000462", "pair_id": "u000462-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000462-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8b184f99d0b067b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000462-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has a credit rating of 34. Folke is solvent. Corin has a mortgage. Folke is not a homeowner. Corin is not delinquent. Ilse is not solvent. Folke has a credit rating of 31. Folke has a repayment grade of 51. Ilse is a homeowner. Folke is not delinquent. Ilse has a credit rating of 61. Corin is not solvent. Folke has no mortgage.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has no mortgage, it thereby is vetted. Point B. If said borrower has collateral, it thereby is amortized. Point C. If said borrower is solvent, it thereby is garnished. Point D. If said borrower has collateral, it thereby is not amortized. Point E. If said borrower is vetted, it thereby has collateral. Point F. If said borrower has a credit rating of minimum 13, it thereby is not vetted. Point G. If said borrower is not a homeowner, it thereby is not garnished. Point D is cancelled if said borrower is delinquent. Point B is cancelled if said borrower is not solvent. Point B is cancelled if said borrower has a repayment grade of minimum 18. Point D is cancelled if said borrower is solvent. Point D supersedes Point B. Point A supersedes Point F. Point G supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Folke is amortized. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000462", "pair_id": "u000462-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000462-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "71ad02f401486037", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000462-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has a credit rating of 34. Folke is solvent. Corin has a mortgage. Folke is not a homeowner. Corin is not delinquent. Ilse is not solvent. Folke has a credit rating of 31. Ilse is a homeowner. Folke is not delinquent. Ilse has a credit rating of 61. Corin is not solvent. Folke has no mortgage.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has no mortgage, so it is vetted. No. 2 While the given borrower has collateral, so it is amortized. No. 3 While the given borrower is solvent, so it is garnished. No. 4 While the given borrower has collateral, so it is not amortized. No. 5 While the given borrower is vetted, so it has collateral. No. 6 While the given borrower has a credit rating not below 13, so it is not vetted. No. 7 While the given borrower is not a homeowner, so it is not garnished. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given borrower is delinquent. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given borrower is not solvent. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a repayment grade not below 18. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given borrower is solvent. No. 4 wins over No. 2. No. 1 wins over No. 6. No. 7 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Folke is amortized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000462", "pair_id": "u000462-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000462-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8b184f99d0b067b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000462-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has a credit rating of 34. Folke is solvent. Corin has a mortgage. Folke is not a homeowner. Corin is not delinquent. Ilse is not solvent. Folke has a credit rating of 31. Folke has a repayment grade of 51. Ilse is a homeowner. Folke is not delinquent. Ilse has a credit rating of 61. Corin is not solvent. Folke has no mortgage.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has no mortgage, so it is vetted. No. 2 While the given borrower has collateral, so it is amortized. No. 3 While the given borrower is solvent, so it is garnished. No. 4 While the given borrower has collateral, so it is not amortized. No. 5 While the given borrower is vetted, so it has collateral. No. 6 While the given borrower has a credit rating not below 13, so it is not vetted. No. 7 While the given borrower is not a homeowner, so it is not garnished. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given borrower is delinquent. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given borrower is not solvent. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a repayment grade not below 18. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given borrower is solvent. No. 4 wins over No. 2. No. 1 wins over No. 6. No. 7 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Folke is amortized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000462", "pair_id": "u000462-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000462-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "71ad02f401486037", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000468-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra has a latency budget of 80. Tundra has a replica count of 18. Tundra has a memory allotment of 36.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is replicated, that workload is idle. Item B. When the workload is replicated, that workload is not idle. Item C. When the workload has a GPU, that workload is patched. Item D. When the workload has a failover node, that workload is replicated. Item E. When the workload is replicated, that workload is sharded. Item F. When the workload has a latency budget of more than 24, that workload is not throttled. Item G. When the workload has a memory allotment of no less than 10, that workload has a failover node. Item B is suspended when the workload has a replica count of less than 19. Item A is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of no more than 28. Item F is suspended when the workload has a replica count of no less than 22. Item B is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of more than 28. Item C is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of no less than 33. Item D is suspended when the workload is autoscaled. Question: Can one infer that Tundra is idle?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000468", "pair_id": "u000468-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000468-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "32e47728885e8bb8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000468-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra has a latency budget of 80. Tundra has a replica count of 61. Tundra has a memory allotment of 36.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is replicated, that workload is idle. Item B. When the workload is replicated, that workload is not idle. Item C. When the workload has a GPU, that workload is patched. Item D. When the workload has a failover node, that workload is replicated. Item E. When the workload is replicated, that workload is sharded. Item F. When the workload has a latency budget of more than 24, that workload is not throttled. Item G. When the workload has a memory allotment of no less than 10, that workload has a failover node. Item B is suspended when the workload has a replica count of less than 19. Item A is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of no more than 28. Item F is suspended when the workload has a replica count of no less than 22. Item B is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of more than 28. Item C is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of no less than 33. Item D is suspended when the workload is autoscaled. Question: Can one infer that Tundra is idle?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000468", "pair_id": "u000468-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000468-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5a91002b97072244", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000536-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse has ethics clearance. Deneb is renewed. Betelgeuse is embargoed. Betelgeuse is renewed. Betelgeuse is not cofunded. Deneb is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse is a pilot study. Betelgeuse has seed funding. Betelgeuse has industry backing. Deneb has industry backing. Betelgeuse is translational. Deneb is translational. Betelgeuse is collaborative. Deneb has no ethics clearance. Deneb has no patent filing. Deneb is collaborative. Betelgeuse is not resubmitted. Betelgeuse has a steering committee. Deneb is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse has no patent filing.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally is not renewed and additionally has seed funding, it then is preregistered. #2 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally is peer reviewed and additionally is not resubmitted, it then is longitudinal. #3 Each time a proposal has a postdoc, it then is not longitudinal. #4 Each time a proposal has a steering committee and additionally is peer reviewed, it then is not shortlisted. #5 Each time a proposal is cofunded and additionally is a pilot study and additionally has no patent filing, it then has a field site. #6 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally is cofunded, it then is exploratory. #7 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally has a postdoc and additionally has industry backing, it then is budgeted. #8 Each time a proposal is cofunded, it then is not theoretical. #9 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally is renewed and additionally is not cofunded, it then is multicenter. #10 Each time a proposal is not collaborative, it then has no field site. #11 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally is embargoed and additionally has no postdoc, it then is theoretical. #12 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally is not translational, it then is endorsed. #2 yields to #3. #11 yields to #8. #10 yields to #5. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Betelgeuse?", "options": ["is budgeted", "is endorsed", "is multicenter", "is exploratory", "is theoretical", "is preregistered", "is longitudinal"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is multicenter", "unit_id": "u000536", "pair_id": "u000536-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000536-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "746062038ca2c246", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a9", "a15", "a19", "a12", "a5", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000536-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse has ethics clearance. Deneb is renewed. Betelgeuse is embargoed. Betelgeuse is not renewed. Betelgeuse is not cofunded. Deneb is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse is a pilot study. Betelgeuse has seed funding. Betelgeuse has industry backing. Deneb has industry backing. Betelgeuse is translational. Deneb is translational. Betelgeuse is collaborative. Deneb has no ethics clearance. Deneb has no patent filing. Deneb is collaborative. Betelgeuse is not resubmitted. Betelgeuse has a steering committee. Deneb is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse has no patent filing.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally is not renewed and additionally has seed funding, it then is preregistered. #2 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally is peer reviewed and additionally is not resubmitted, it then is longitudinal. #3 Each time a proposal has a postdoc, it then is not longitudinal. #4 Each time a proposal has a steering committee and additionally is peer reviewed, it then is not shortlisted. #5 Each time a proposal is cofunded and additionally is a pilot study and additionally has no patent filing, it then has a field site. #6 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally is cofunded, it then is exploratory. #7 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally has a postdoc and additionally has industry backing, it then is budgeted. #8 Each time a proposal is cofunded, it then is not theoretical. #9 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally is renewed and additionally is not cofunded, it then is multicenter. #10 Each time a proposal is not collaborative, it then has no field site. #11 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally is embargoed and additionally has no postdoc, it then is theoretical. #12 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally is not translational, it then is endorsed. #2 yields to #3. #11 yields to #8. #10 yields to #5. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Betelgeuse?", "options": ["is budgeted", "is endorsed", "is multicenter", "is exploratory", "is theoretical", "is preregistered", "is longitudinal"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is preregistered", "unit_id": "u000536", "pair_id": "u000536-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000536-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f609dd3aca0929a4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a9", "a15", "a19", "a12", "a5", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000545-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian has a mobility rank of 25. Dorian is referred. Gunnar is referred. Elif is referred. Dorian has a pacemaker. Gunnar has a pacemaker. Dorian has a caregiver. Elif has a pacemaker. Gunnar has a pain level of 57. Elif has a pain level of 67. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 69. Gunnar is bedridden. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 85. Yusuf has no caregiver. Dorian has a pain level of 88. Yusuf has a pain level of 57. Elif is bedridden.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a caregiver and also has a mobility rank under 88, it also is vaccinated. Clause 2: once any patient has a pacemaker and also is referred, it also is fasting. Clause 3: once any patient is fasting and also has a pain level of 84 or more and also has a mobility rank of 77 or less, it also has a chaperone. Clause 4: once any patient has a caregiver, it also is not contagious. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a pacemaker. Clause 1 does not hold for a patient when any patient is bedridden. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a pacemaker and also is bedridden. Question: Does it follow that Dorian has a chaperone?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000545", "pair_id": "u000545-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000545-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1ce707e0e8c057e0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000545-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian has a mobility rank of 25. Dorian is referred. Gunnar is referred. Elif is referred. Dorian has a pacemaker. Gunnar has a pacemaker. Dorian has a caregiver. Elif has a pacemaker. Gunnar has a pain level of 57. Elif has a pain level of 67. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 69. Gunnar is bedridden. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 85. Yusuf has no caregiver. Dorian has a pain level of 88. Yusuf has a pain level of 57. Elif is bedridden.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a caregiver and also has a mobility rank under 88, it also is vaccinated. Clause 2: once any patient has a pacemaker and also is referred, it also is fasting. Clause 3: once any patient is fasting and also has a pain level under 84 and also has a mobility rank of 31 or less, it also has no chaperone. Clause 4: once any patient is fasting and also has a pain level of 84 or more and also has a mobility rank of 77 or less, it also has a chaperone. Clause 5: once any patient has a caregiver, it also is not contagious. Clause 5 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a pacemaker. Clause 1 does not hold for a patient when any patient is bedridden. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a pacemaker and also is bedridden. Question: Does it follow that Dorian has a chaperone?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000545", "pair_id": "u000545-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000545-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d23a9aa2f0a00254", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000551-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt has no public endpoint. Nimbus is not throttled. Halcyon is throttled. Cobalt is not deprecated. Nimbus is deprecated. Halcyon has a public endpoint. Cobalt has a dedicated host. Halcyon has no dedicated host. Cobalt is not patched. Nimbus has a public endpoint.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is patched, it also is not monitored. Clause 2: once any workload is monitored, it also is autoscaled. Clause 3: once any workload is throttled, it also is isolated. Clause 4: once any workload is throttled, it also is sandboxed. Clause 5: once any workload is idle, it also is not autoscaled. Clause 6: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is monitored. Clause 7: once any workload is deprecated, it also is not idle. Clause 8: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is not sandboxed. Clause 9: once any workload has a dedicated host, it also is idle. Clause 6 overrides Clause 1. Clause 4 overrides Clause 8. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Clause 7 overrides Clause 9. Question: Does it follow that Cobalt is not autoscaled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000551", "pair_id": "u000551-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000551-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "0a5ae0e7ab41d50f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000551-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt has no public endpoint. Cobalt is throttled. Nimbus is not throttled. Halcyon is throttled. Cobalt is not deprecated. Nimbus is deprecated. Halcyon has a public endpoint. Cobalt has a dedicated host. Halcyon has no dedicated host. Cobalt is not patched. Nimbus has a public endpoint.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is patched, it also is not monitored. Clause 2: once any workload is monitored, it also is autoscaled. Clause 3: once any workload is throttled, it also is isolated. Clause 4: once any workload is throttled, it also is sandboxed. Clause 5: once any workload is idle, it also is not autoscaled. Clause 6: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is monitored. Clause 7: once any workload is deprecated, it also is not idle. Clause 8: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is not sandboxed. Clause 9: once any workload has a dedicated host, it also is idle. Clause 6 overrides Clause 1. Clause 4 overrides Clause 8. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Clause 7 overrides Clause 9. Question: Does it follow that Cobalt is not autoscaled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000551", "pair_id": "u000551-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000551-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "d14f705f822aacc0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000633-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz has a defect tally of 49. Quartz has a lint backlog of 17. Quartz has a patch cycle of 37. Pumice has a patch cycle of 66. Pumice is not flaky.", "instruction": "(1) If a build has a lint backlog below 38, then it is reproducible. (2) If a build is flaky, then it is not minified. (3) If a build has a defect tally of at least 58, then it has a migration script. (4) If a build has a patch cycle above 65, then it is benchmarked. (5) If a build has a lint backlog of at least 38, then it is signed. (6) If a build is reproducible, then it is backported. (7) If a build is compiled, then it is tested. (8) If a build is signed, then it is notarized. (9) If a build has a security advisory, then it is versioned. (10) If a build has a patch cycle of at most 65, then it is compiled. (11) If a build has a migration script, then it is fuzzed. (12) If a build is benchmarked, then it is merged. (13) If a build is backported, then it is reverted. (14) If a build has a defect tally below 58, then it has a security advisory. (15) If a build has a patch cycle of at least 16, then it has a changelog. Question: Which option holds for Pumice?", "options": ["is tested", "is versioned", "is notarized", "is backported", "is merged", "is fuzzed"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is merged", "unit_id": "u000633", "pair_id": "u000633-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000633-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "f32cdcc6108205d6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a18", "a12", "a0", "a3", "a16", "a2"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000633-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz has a defect tally of 49. Quartz has a lint backlog of 17. Quartz has a patch cycle of 37. Pumice has a patch cycle of 49. Pumice is not flaky.", "instruction": "(1) If a build has a lint backlog below 38, then it is reproducible. (2) If a build is flaky, then it is not minified. (3) If a build has a defect tally of at least 58, then it has a migration script. (4) If a build has a patch cycle above 65, then it is benchmarked. (5) If a build has a lint backlog of at least 38, then it is signed. (6) If a build is reproducible, then it is backported. (7) If a build is compiled, then it is tested. (8) If a build is signed, then it is notarized. (9) If a build has a security advisory, then it is versioned. (10) If a build has a patch cycle of at most 65, then it is compiled. (11) If a build has a migration script, then it is fuzzed. (12) If a build is benchmarked, then it is merged. (13) If a build is backported, then it is reverted. (14) If a build has a defect tally below 58, then it has a security advisory. (15) If a build has a patch cycle of at least 16, then it has a changelog. Question: Which option holds for Pumice?", "options": ["is tested", "is versioned", "is notarized", "is backported", "is merged", "is fuzzed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is tested", "unit_id": "u000633", "pair_id": "u000633-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000633-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "d370c37034e05887", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a18", "a12", "a0", "a3", "a16", "a2"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000633-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz has a defect tally of 49. Quartz has a lint backlog of 17. Quartz has a patch cycle of 37. Pumice has a patch cycle of 66. Pumice is not flaky.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build has a lint backlog under 38, it also is reproducible. Clause 2: once any build is flaky, it also is not minified. Clause 3: once any build has a defect tally of 58 or more, it also has a migration script. Clause 4: once any build has a patch cycle over 65, it also is benchmarked. Clause 5: once any build has a lint backlog of 38 or more, it also is signed. Clause 6: once any build is reproducible, it also is backported. Clause 7: once any build is compiled, it also is tested. Clause 8: once any build is signed, it also is notarized. Clause 9: once any build has a security advisory, it also is versioned. Clause 10: once any build has a patch cycle of 65 or less, it also is compiled. Clause 11: once any build has a migration script, it also is fuzzed. Clause 12: once any build is benchmarked, it also is merged. Clause 13: once any build is backported, it also is reverted. Clause 14: once any build has a defect tally under 58, it also has a security advisory. Clause 15: once any build has a patch cycle of 16 or more, it also has a changelog. Question: Which of these is true of Pumice?", "options": ["is tested", "is versioned", "is notarized", "is backported", "is merged", "is fuzzed"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is merged", "unit_id": "u000633", "pair_id": "u000633-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000633-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "f32cdcc6108205d6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a18", "a12", "a0", "a3", "a16", "a2"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000633-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz has a defect tally of 49. Quartz has a lint backlog of 17. Quartz has a patch cycle of 37. Pumice has a patch cycle of 49. Pumice is not flaky.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build has a lint backlog under 38, it also is reproducible. Clause 2: once any build is flaky, it also is not minified. Clause 3: once any build has a defect tally of 58 or more, it also has a migration script. Clause 4: once any build has a patch cycle over 65, it also is benchmarked. Clause 5: once any build has a lint backlog of 38 or more, it also is signed. Clause 6: once any build is reproducible, it also is backported. Clause 7: once any build is compiled, it also is tested. Clause 8: once any build is signed, it also is notarized. Clause 9: once any build has a security advisory, it also is versioned. Clause 10: once any build has a patch cycle of 65 or less, it also is compiled. Clause 11: once any build has a migration script, it also is fuzzed. Clause 12: once any build is benchmarked, it also is merged. Clause 13: once any build is backported, it also is reverted. Clause 14: once any build has a defect tally under 58, it also has a security advisory. Clause 15: once any build has a patch cycle of 16 or more, it also has a changelog. Question: Which of these is true of Pumice?", "options": ["is tested", "is versioned", "is notarized", "is backported", "is merged", "is fuzzed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is tested", "unit_id": "u000633", "pair_id": "u000633-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000633-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "d370c37034e05887", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a18", "a12", "a0", "a3", "a16", "a2"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000671-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is reproducible. Galena is not tagged. Basalt is reproducible. Talc is not compiled. Galena is tested. Basalt is tagged. Galena is not compiled. Talc is tested. Basalt is not tested. Talc is not tagged.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is not tagged while is not tested, thus it is not merged. Provision 2: when the build here is reproducible, thus it has a security advisory. Provision 3: when the build here is not tagged while is tested, thus it is merged. Provision 4: when the build here is not compiled, thus it has no security advisory. Provision 2 has no effect when the build here has a migration script. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here has a migration script while is tested. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Talc is merged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000671", "pair_id": "u000671-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/10", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000671-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ead06960fd4b27b5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000671-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is reproducible. Galena is not tagged. Basalt is reproducible. Talc is not compiled. Galena is tested. Basalt is tagged. Galena is not compiled. Talc is tested. Basalt is not tested. Talc is not tagged. Talc has a migration script.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is not tagged while is not tested, thus it is not merged. Provision 2: when the build here is reproducible, thus it has a security advisory. Provision 3: when the build here is not tagged while is tested, thus it is merged. Provision 4: when the build here is not compiled, thus it has no security advisory. Provision 2 has no effect when the build here has a migration script. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here has a migration script while is tested. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Talc is merged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000671", "pair_id": "u000671-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/10", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000671-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4620a1594566111e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000671-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is reproducible. Galena is not tagged. Basalt is reproducible. Talc is not compiled. Galena is tested. Basalt is tagged. Galena is not compiled. Talc is tested. Basalt is not tested. Talc is not tagged.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is not tagged and further is not tested, it thereby is not merged. Point B. If said build is reproducible, it thereby has a security advisory. Point C. If said build is not tagged and further is tested, it thereby is merged. Point D. If said build is not compiled, it thereby has no security advisory. Point B is cancelled if said build has a migration script. Point A is cancelled if said build has a migration script and further is tested. Point C supersedes Point A. Point B supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Talc is merged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000671", "pair_id": "u000671-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/10", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000671-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ead06960fd4b27b5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000671-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is reproducible. Galena is not tagged. Basalt is reproducible. Talc is not compiled. Galena is tested. Basalt is tagged. Galena is not compiled. Talc is tested. Basalt is not tested. Talc is not tagged. Talc has a migration script.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is not tagged and further is not tested, it thereby is not merged. Point B. If said build is reproducible, it thereby has a security advisory. Point C. If said build is not tagged and further is tested, it thereby is merged. Point D. If said build is not compiled, it thereby has no security advisory. Point B is cancelled if said build has a migration script. Point A is cancelled if said build has a migration script and further is tested. Point C supersedes Point A. Point B supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Talc is merged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000671", "pair_id": "u000671-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/10", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000671-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4620a1594566111e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000671-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is reproducible. Galena is not tagged. Basalt is reproducible. Talc is not compiled. Galena is tested. Basalt is tagged. Galena is not compiled. Talc is tested. Basalt is not tested. Talc is not tagged.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is not tagged and likewise is not tested, so it is not merged. No. 2 While the given build is reproducible, so it has a security advisory. No. 3 While the given build is not tagged and likewise is tested, so it is merged. No. 4 While the given build is not compiled, so it has no security advisory. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build has a migration script. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build has a migration script and likewise is tested. No. 3 wins over No. 1. No. 2 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Talc is merged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000671", "pair_id": "u000671-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/10", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000671-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ead06960fd4b27b5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000671-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is reproducible. Galena is not tagged. Basalt is reproducible. Talc is not compiled. Galena is tested. Basalt is tagged. Galena is not compiled. Talc is tested. Basalt is not tested. Talc is not tagged. Talc has a migration script.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is not tagged and likewise is not tested, so it is not merged. No. 2 While the given build is reproducible, so it has a security advisory. No. 3 While the given build is not tagged and likewise is tested, so it is merged. No. 4 While the given build is not compiled, so it has no security advisory. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build has a migration script. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build has a migration script and likewise is tested. No. 3 wins over No. 1. No. 2 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Talc is merged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000671", "pair_id": "u000671-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/10", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000671-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4620a1594566111e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u000678-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin is not indebted. Corin is a depositor. Corin is not prequalified.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is not prequalified, then it is delinquent. (2) If a borrower is foreclosed, then it has a guarantor. (3) If a borrower is garnished, then it is solvent. (4) If a borrower is a depositor, then it is garnished. (5) If a borrower is solvent, then it has no collateral. (6) If a borrower is indebted, then it is foreclosed. (7) If a borrower has a guarantor, then it has collateral. Question: Is it true that Corin has collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000678", "pair_id": "u000678-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000678-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "5d1db0e1e51b3f91", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000678-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin is not indebted. Corin is a depositor. Corin is not prequalified.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is prequalified, then it is delinquent. (2) If a borrower is foreclosed, then it has a guarantor. (3) If a borrower is garnished, then it is solvent. (4) If a borrower is a depositor, then it is garnished. (5) If a borrower is solvent, then it has no collateral. (6) If a borrower is indebted, then it is foreclosed. (7) If a borrower has a guarantor, then it has collateral. Question: Is it true that Corin has collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000678", "pair_id": "u000678-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000678-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "eb3730b8e7adc3a5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000717-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is headhunted. Rune is not headhunted. Rune is not unionized. Rune has a background screening. Ivo is not bonded. Kalle is not bonded. Rune has a diploma. Kalle is onboarded. Ivo is not unionized. Rune is not onboarded. Rune is bonded. Lotte is not bonded.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate has a background screening and has a diploma and is bonded, then it has no portfolio. (2) If a candidate has a background screening and is not headhunted and is bonded, then it has a portfolio. (3) If a candidate is unionized, then it is bilingual. (4) If a candidate has a background screening, then it is licensed. (5) If a candidate has a diploma, then it is not licensed. (1) is void if the candidate is onboarded and has a background screening. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Rune has a portfolio?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000717", "pair_id": "u000717-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000717-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5604e97a4a4d12e9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000717-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is headhunted. Rune is not headhunted. Rune is not unionized. Rune has a background screening. Ivo is not bonded. Kalle is not bonded. Rune has a diploma. Kalle is onboarded. Ivo is not unionized. Rune is not onboarded. Rune is bonded. Lotte is not bonded.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate has a background screening and has a diploma and is bonded, then it has no portfolio. (2) If a candidate has a background screening and is headhunted and is bonded, then it has a portfolio. (3) If a candidate is unionized, then it is bilingual. (4) If a candidate has a background screening, then it is licensed. (5) If a candidate has a diploma, then it is not licensed. (1) is void if the candidate is onboarded and has a background screening. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Rune has a portfolio?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000717", "pair_id": "u000717-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000717-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a3662adbf5da68bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000724-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is vetted. Anouk has a mortgage. Anouk has collateral. Folke is not vetted. Ingrid has a guarantor. Ilse is foreclosed. Anouk has no guarantor. Anouk is overdrawn. Ingrid is overdrawn. Ingrid is underwritten. Anouk is employed. Ilse is not audited. Anouk is audited. Folke has a guarantor. Anouk is not vetted. Ilse is underwritten. Folke is not audited. Anouk is underwritten. Ilse is employed. Folke is not overdrawn. Folke is a depositor. Ingrid is employed. Ingrid is not audited. Anouk is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is employed while has a mortgage, thus it is delinquent. Provision 2: when the borrower here is audited, thus it is not delinquent. Provision 3: when the borrower here is underwritten while is vetted, thus it is a homeowner. Provision 4: when the borrower here has an escrow account while has collateral while is employed, thus it is not indebted. Provision 5: when the borrower here has an escrow account while is foreclosed while is overdrawn, thus it is indebted. Provision 6: when the borrower here has collateral while has a mortgage, thus it has no escrow account. Provision 7: when the borrower here is delinquent while is foreclosed while is overdrawn, thus it has an escrow account. Provision 8: when the borrower here has collateral, thus it is not a homeowner. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here has a mortgage. Provision 5 has no effect when the borrower here is a depositor while has a guarantor. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Would it be right to say that Anouk is indebted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000724", "pair_id": "u000724-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000724-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "012c8ec902f08b97", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000724-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is vetted. Anouk has a mortgage. Anouk has no collateral. Folke is not vetted. Ingrid has a guarantor. Ilse is foreclosed. Anouk has no guarantor. Anouk is overdrawn. Ingrid is overdrawn. Ingrid is underwritten. Anouk is employed. Ilse is not audited. Anouk is audited. Folke has a guarantor. Anouk is not vetted. Ilse is underwritten. Folke is not audited. Anouk is underwritten. Ilse is employed. Folke is not overdrawn. Folke is a depositor. Ingrid is employed. Ingrid is not audited. Anouk is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is employed while has a mortgage, thus it is delinquent. Provision 2: when the borrower here is audited, thus it is not delinquent. Provision 3: when the borrower here is underwritten while is vetted, thus it is a homeowner. Provision 4: when the borrower here has an escrow account while has collateral while is employed, thus it is not indebted. Provision 5: when the borrower here has an escrow account while is foreclosed while is overdrawn, thus it is indebted. Provision 6: when the borrower here has collateral while has a mortgage, thus it has no escrow account. Provision 7: when the borrower here is delinquent while is foreclosed while is overdrawn, thus it has an escrow account. Provision 8: when the borrower here has collateral, thus it is not a homeowner. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here has a mortgage. Provision 5 has no effect when the borrower here is a depositor while has a guarantor. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Would it be right to say that Anouk is indebted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000724", "pair_id": "u000724-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000724-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8b43662d17a031fb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000724-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is vetted. Anouk has a mortgage. Anouk has collateral. Folke is not vetted. Ingrid has a guarantor. Ilse is foreclosed. Anouk has no guarantor. Anouk is overdrawn. Ingrid is overdrawn. Ingrid is underwritten. Anouk is employed. Ilse is not audited. Anouk is audited. Folke has a guarantor. Anouk is not vetted. Ilse is underwritten. Folke is not audited. Anouk is underwritten. Ilse is employed. Folke is not overdrawn. Folke is a depositor. Ingrid is employed. Ingrid is not audited. Anouk is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is employed and further has a mortgage, it thereby is delinquent. Point B. If said borrower is audited, it thereby is not delinquent. Point C. If said borrower is underwritten and further is vetted, it thereby is a homeowner. Point D. If said borrower has an escrow account and further has collateral and further is employed, it thereby is not indebted. Point E. If said borrower has an escrow account and further is foreclosed and further is overdrawn, it thereby is indebted. Point F. If said borrower has collateral and further has a mortgage, it thereby has no escrow account. Point G. If said borrower is delinquent and further is foreclosed and further is overdrawn, it thereby has an escrow account. Point H. If said borrower has collateral, it thereby is not a homeowner. Point C is cancelled if said borrower has a mortgage. Point E is cancelled if said borrower is a depositor and further has a guarantor. Point D supersedes Point E. Point A supersedes Point B. Point C supersedes Point H. Point G supersedes Point F. Question: Statement: Anouk is indebted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000724", "pair_id": "u000724-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000724-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "012c8ec902f08b97", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000724-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is vetted. Anouk has a mortgage. Anouk has no collateral. Folke is not vetted. Ingrid has a guarantor. Ilse is foreclosed. Anouk has no guarantor. Anouk is overdrawn. Ingrid is overdrawn. Ingrid is underwritten. Anouk is employed. Ilse is not audited. Anouk is audited. Folke has a guarantor. Anouk is not vetted. Ilse is underwritten. Folke is not audited. Anouk is underwritten. Ilse is employed. Folke is not overdrawn. Folke is a depositor. Ingrid is employed. Ingrid is not audited. Anouk is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is employed and further has a mortgage, it thereby is delinquent. Point B. If said borrower is audited, it thereby is not delinquent. Point C. If said borrower is underwritten and further is vetted, it thereby is a homeowner. Point D. If said borrower has an escrow account and further has collateral and further is employed, it thereby is not indebted. Point E. If said borrower has an escrow account and further is foreclosed and further is overdrawn, it thereby is indebted. Point F. If said borrower has collateral and further has a mortgage, it thereby has no escrow account. Point G. If said borrower is delinquent and further is foreclosed and further is overdrawn, it thereby has an escrow account. Point H. If said borrower has collateral, it thereby is not a homeowner. Point C is cancelled if said borrower has a mortgage. Point E is cancelled if said borrower is a depositor and further has a guarantor. Point D supersedes Point E. Point A supersedes Point B. Point C supersedes Point H. Point G supersedes Point F. Question: Statement: Anouk is indebted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000724", "pair_id": "u000724-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000724-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8b43662d17a031fb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000737-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dorian is not pregnant. Benedek is not waitlisted. Benedek is not rescheduled. Benedek is anemic. Aurel is pregnant. Aurel is waitlisted. Aurel is rescheduled.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is postoperative. Point B. If said patient is waitlisted, it thereby is diabetic. Point C. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby is referred. Point D. If said patient is ambulatory, it thereby is bedridden. Point E. If said patient is waitlisted, it thereby is not ambulatory. Point F. If said patient is asthmatic, it thereby is ambulatory. Point G. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby is asthmatic. Point H. If said patient is hypertensive, it thereby is fasting. Point I. If said patient is anemic, it thereby has a pacemaker. Point J. If said patient is diabetic, it thereby is hypertensive. Point K. If said patient is postoperative, it thereby is symptomatic. Point C is cancelled if said patient is pregnant. Point E supersedes Point F. Question: Which choice is true for Aurel?", "options": ["is fasting", "is bedridden", "is referred"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is fasting", "unit_id": "u000737", "pair_id": "u000737-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000737-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a8e2c70d5447f8a2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a3", "a9"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000737-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dorian is not pregnant. Benedek is not waitlisted. Aurel is anemic. Benedek is not rescheduled. Benedek is anemic. Aurel is pregnant. Aurel is waitlisted. Aurel is rescheduled.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is postoperative. Point B. If said patient is waitlisted, it thereby is diabetic. Point C. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby is referred. Point D. If said patient is ambulatory, it thereby is bedridden. Point E. If said patient is waitlisted, it thereby is not ambulatory. Point F. If said patient is asthmatic, it thereby is ambulatory. Point G. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby is asthmatic. Point H. If said patient is hypertensive, it thereby is fasting. Point I. If said patient is anemic, it thereby has a pacemaker. Point J. If said patient is diabetic, it thereby is hypertensive. Point K. If said patient is postoperative, it thereby is symptomatic. Point C is cancelled if said patient is pregnant. Point E supersedes Point F. Question: Which choice is true for Aurel?", "options": ["is fasting", "is bedridden", "is referred"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is fasting", "unit_id": "u000737", "pair_id": "u000737-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000737-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "abaca56ee747a0c4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a3", "a9"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000737-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dorian is not pregnant. Benedek is not waitlisted. Benedek is not rescheduled. Benedek is anemic. Aurel is pregnant. Aurel is waitlisted. Aurel is rescheduled.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is rescheduled, so it is postoperative. No. 2 While the given patient is waitlisted, so it is diabetic. No. 3 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is referred. No. 4 While the given patient is ambulatory, so it is bedridden. No. 5 While the given patient is waitlisted, so it is not ambulatory. No. 6 While the given patient is asthmatic, so it is ambulatory. No. 7 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is asthmatic. No. 8 While the given patient is hypertensive, so it is fasting. No. 9 While the given patient is anemic, so it has a pacemaker. No. 10 While the given patient is diabetic, so it is hypertensive. No. 11 While the given patient is postoperative, so it is symptomatic. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given patient is pregnant. No. 5 wins over No. 6. Question: Select what holds for Aurel: which option?", "options": ["is fasting", "is bedridden", "is referred"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is fasting", "unit_id": "u000737", "pair_id": "u000737-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000737-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a8e2c70d5447f8a2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a3", "a9"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000737-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dorian is not pregnant. Benedek is not waitlisted. Aurel is anemic. Benedek is not rescheduled. Benedek is anemic. Aurel is pregnant. Aurel is waitlisted. Aurel is rescheduled.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is rescheduled, so it is postoperative. No. 2 While the given patient is waitlisted, so it is diabetic. No. 3 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is referred. No. 4 While the given patient is ambulatory, so it is bedridden. No. 5 While the given patient is waitlisted, so it is not ambulatory. No. 6 While the given patient is asthmatic, so it is ambulatory. No. 7 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is asthmatic. No. 8 While the given patient is hypertensive, so it is fasting. No. 9 While the given patient is anemic, so it has a pacemaker. No. 10 While the given patient is diabetic, so it is hypertensive. No. 11 While the given patient is postoperative, so it is symptomatic. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given patient is pregnant. No. 5 wins over No. 6. Question: Select what holds for Aurel: which option?", "options": ["is fasting", "is bedridden", "is referred"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is fasting", "unit_id": "u000737", "pair_id": "u000737-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000737-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "abaca56ee747a0c4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a3", "a9"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000763-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is not palletized. Kaveh is not palletized. Kaveh has a postal zone of 41. Rasmus has a postal zone of 38. Quentin has a postal zone of 46.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is not damaged provided that it has a postal zone lower than 11. Section 2: a parcel is not fragile provided that it has a postal zone lower than 47. Section 3: a parcel is weighed provided that it has a postal zone lower than 39. Section 4: a parcel is fragile provided that it is palletized. Section 5: a parcel is registered provided that it has a postal zone of 23 or lower. Section 6: a parcel is damaged provided that it has a postal zone of 39 or higher. Section 7: a parcel has no courier provided that it is not damaged. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Which statement fits Rasmus?", "options": ["is damaged", "is weighed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is weighed", "unit_id": "u000763", "pair_id": "u000763-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000763-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1bb5ff27c445df1f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a2", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000763-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is not palletized. Kaveh is not palletized. Kaveh has a postal zone of 41. Rasmus has a postal zone of 3. Quentin has a postal zone of 46.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is not damaged provided that it has a postal zone lower than 11. Section 2: a parcel is not fragile provided that it has a postal zone lower than 47. Section 3: a parcel is weighed provided that it has a postal zone lower than 39. Section 4: a parcel is fragile provided that it is palletized. Section 5: a parcel is registered provided that it has a postal zone of 23 or lower. Section 6: a parcel is damaged provided that it has a postal zone of 39 or higher. Section 7: a parcel has no courier provided that it is not damaged. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Which statement fits Rasmus?", "options": ["is damaged", "is weighed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is weighed", "unit_id": "u000763", "pair_id": "u000763-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000763-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f215559fc97028d0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a2", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000763-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is not palletized. Kaveh is not palletized. Kaveh has a postal zone of 41. Rasmus has a postal zone of 38. Quentin has a postal zone of 46.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has a postal zone less than 11, it then is not damaged. #2 Each time a parcel has a postal zone less than 47, it then is not fragile. #3 Each time a parcel has a postal zone less than 39, it then is weighed. #4 Each time a parcel is palletized, it then is fragile. #5 Each time a parcel has a postal zone of 23 or below, it then is registered. #6 Each time a parcel has a postal zone of 39 or above, it then is damaged. #7 Each time a parcel is not damaged, it then has no courier. #6 yields to #1. #4 yields to #2. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Rasmus?", "options": ["is damaged", "is weighed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is weighed", "unit_id": "u000763", "pair_id": "u000763-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000763-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1bb5ff27c445df1f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a2", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000763-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is not palletized. Kaveh is not palletized. Kaveh has a postal zone of 41. Rasmus has a postal zone of 3. Quentin has a postal zone of 46.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has a postal zone less than 11, it then is not damaged. #2 Each time a parcel has a postal zone less than 47, it then is not fragile. #3 Each time a parcel has a postal zone less than 39, it then is weighed. #4 Each time a parcel is palletized, it then is fragile. #5 Each time a parcel has a postal zone of 23 or below, it then is registered. #6 Each time a parcel has a postal zone of 39 or above, it then is damaged. #7 Each time a parcel is not damaged, it then has no courier. #6 yields to #1. #4 yields to #2. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Rasmus?", "options": ["is damaged", "is weighed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is weighed", "unit_id": "u000763", "pair_id": "u000763-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000763-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f215559fc97028d0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a2", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000794-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zora has a fever reading of 4. Xenia is not rescheduled. Xenia has a pulse rate of 58. Gunnar has a chaperone. Zora is rescheduled. Xenia has a fever reading of 58. Xenia is not hypertensive. Xenia is bedridden. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 51. Xenia is not referred. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 94. Gunnar is bedridden. Xenia has a pain level of 7. Zora has a pain level of 78. Xenia has a mobility rank of 81. Gunnar has a fever reading of 5. Gunnar is not postoperative. Gunnar is rescheduled. Gunnar is pregnant. Xenia has a chaperone.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is bedridden and additionally is pregnant, it then has no caregiver. #2 Each time a patient has a caregiver and additionally has a mobility rank of 55 or above and additionally has a pain level greater than 69, it then is anemic. #3 Each time a patient has a caregiver and additionally is asthmatic and additionally has a chaperone, it then is discharged. #4 Each time a patient has a caregiver and additionally has a mobility rank less than 55, it then has an interpreter. #5 Each time a patient is postoperative and additionally has a pulse rate of 17 or above, it then is vaccinated. #6 Each time a patient is asthmatic, it then is not waitlisted. #7 Each time a patient has a fever reading greater than 48 and additionally is bedridden, it then has a caregiver. #8 Each time a patient has a caregiver and additionally has a chaperone, it then is waitlisted. #9 Each time a patient is rescheduled, it then is asthmatic. #5 is set aside if a patient has a chaperone and additionally is rescheduled. #7 yields to #1. #8 yields to #6. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Xenia?", "options": ["is discharged", "has an interpreter", "is anemic", "is waitlisted"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is waitlisted", "unit_id": "u000794", "pair_id": "u000794-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000794-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "54b58c0255aa3c2f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a1", "a10", "a16"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000794-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zora has a fever reading of 4. Xenia is not rescheduled. Xenia has a pulse rate of 58. Gunnar has a chaperone. Zora is rescheduled. Xenia has a fever reading of 58. Xenia is not hypertensive. Xenia is bedridden. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 51. Xenia is not referred. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 94. Gunnar is bedridden. Xenia has a pain level of 7. Zora has a pain level of 78. Xenia has a mobility rank of 81. Gunnar has a fever reading of 5. Gunnar is not postoperative. Gunnar is rescheduled. Gunnar is pregnant. Xenia has a chaperone.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is bedridden and additionally is pregnant, it then has no caregiver. #2 Each time a patient has a caregiver and additionally has a mobility rank of 55 or above and additionally has a pain level greater than 69, it then is anemic. #3 Each time a patient has a caregiver and additionally is asthmatic and additionally has a chaperone, it then is discharged. #4 Each time a patient has a caregiver and additionally has a mobility rank less than 55, it then has an interpreter. #5 Each time a patient is postoperative and additionally has a pulse rate less than 17, it then is vaccinated. #6 Each time a patient is asthmatic, it then is not waitlisted. #7 Each time a patient has a fever reading greater than 48 and additionally is bedridden, it then has a caregiver. #8 Each time a patient has a caregiver and additionally has a chaperone, it then is waitlisted. #9 Each time a patient is rescheduled, it then is asthmatic. #5 is set aside if a patient has a chaperone and additionally is rescheduled. #7 yields to #1. #8 yields to #6. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Xenia?", "options": ["is discharged", "has an interpreter", "is anemic", "is waitlisted"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is waitlisted", "unit_id": "u000794", "pair_id": "u000794-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000794-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bf6a84877fc3baad", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a1", "a10", "a16"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000871-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar has no pacemaker. Vilja is not triaged. Vilja has a fever reading of 60. Vilja is not fasting. Wendel has a pacemaker. Vilja is not postoperative. Vilja has a mobility rank of 9. Wendel has a mobility rank of 93. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 52. Wendel is fasting. Vilja has a chaperone.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a mobility rank of 92 or more, it also is ambulatory. Clause 2: once any patient is not postoperative and also is not fasting and also has no chaperone, it also is waitlisted. Clause 3: once any patient is vaccinated and also has a fever reading of 20 or more and also is not triaged, it also is not discharged. Clause 4: once any patient is vaccinated and also has a fever reading under 20 and also is waitlisted, it also is discharged. Clause 5: once any patient is ambulatory, it also is vaccinated. Clause 6: once any patient is not asthmatic, it also is symptomatic. Clause 7: once any patient has no chaperone and also has no pacemaker, it also has no caregiver. Question: Does it follow that Vilja is discharged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000871", "pair_id": "u000871-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000871-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "3befb375e2aee99d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a13", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000871-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar has no pacemaker. Vilja is not triaged. Vilja has a fever reading of 60. Vilja is not fasting. Wendel has a pacemaker. Vilja is not postoperative. Vilja has a mobility rank of 9. Wendel has a mobility rank of 93. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 52. Wendel is fasting. Vilja has a chaperone.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a mobility rank of 43 or more, it also is ambulatory. Clause 2: once any patient is not postoperative and also is not fasting and also has no chaperone, it also is waitlisted. Clause 3: once any patient is vaccinated and also has a fever reading of 20 or more and also is not triaged, it also is not discharged. Clause 4: once any patient is vaccinated and also has a fever reading under 20 and also is waitlisted, it also is discharged. Clause 5: once any patient is ambulatory, it also is vaccinated. Clause 6: once any patient is not asthmatic, it also is symptomatic. Clause 7: once any patient has no chaperone and also has no pacemaker, it also has no caregiver. Question: Does it follow that Vilja is discharged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000871", "pair_id": "u000871-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000871-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "56a54305c3bbc3d6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a13", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u000906-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is embargoed. Kochab is theoretical. Electra is shortlisted. Gemma has seed funding. Gemma is shortlisted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is longitudinal. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is translational: then it is cofunded. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is embargoed: then it has ethics clearance. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it is translational. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is shortlisted: then it is not translational. Question: Is it so that Gemma is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000906", "pair_id": "u000906-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000906-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "e9255ad876a9b19c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u000906-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is embargoed. Kochab is theoretical. Electra is shortlisted. Gemma has seed funding. Gemma is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is longitudinal. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is translational: then it is cofunded. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is embargoed: then it has ethics clearance. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it is translational. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is shortlisted: then it is not translational. Question: Is it so that Gemma is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000906", "pair_id": "u000906-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000906-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "a6f6b49302060246", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u000933-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is not refinanced. Greta is delinquent. Greta is not solvent. Greta is bankrupt. Greta is not pensioned. Greta has no cosigner.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is not employed provided that it is pensioned as well as is not solvent. Section 2: a borrower is employed provided that it is refinanced. Section 1 lapses for a borrower if it is pensioned as well as has a cosigner. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Greta is delinquent. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000933", "pair_id": "u000933-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000933-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "29071d00871f93c9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000933-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is not refinanced. Greta is not delinquent. Greta is not solvent. Greta is bankrupt. Greta is not pensioned. Greta has no cosigner.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is not employed provided that it is pensioned as well as is not solvent. Section 2: a borrower is employed provided that it is refinanced. Section 1 lapses for a borrower if it is pensioned as well as has a cosigner. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Greta is delinquent. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000933", "pair_id": "u000933-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000933-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4b81e209cb5ddfab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000933-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is not refinanced. Greta is delinquent. Greta is not solvent. Greta is bankrupt. Greta is not pensioned. Greta has no cosigner.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is pensioned and additionally is not solvent, it then is not employed. #2 Each time a borrower is refinanced, it then is employed. #1 is set aside if a borrower is pensioned and additionally has a cosigner. #1 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Greta is delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000933", "pair_id": "u000933-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000933-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "29071d00871f93c9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000933-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is not refinanced. Greta is not delinquent. Greta is not solvent. Greta is bankrupt. Greta is not pensioned. Greta has no cosigner.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is pensioned and additionally is not solvent, it then is not employed. #2 Each time a borrower is refinanced, it then is employed. #1 is set aside if a borrower is pensioned and additionally has a cosigner. #1 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Greta is delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000933", "pair_id": "u000933-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000933-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4b81e209cb5ddfab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000943-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is postoperative. Dorian is not postoperative.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is not vaccinated, thus it is fasting. Provision 2: when the patient here is not hypertensive, thus it is allergic. Provision 3: when the patient here is vaccinated, thus it has an interpreter. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here is postoperative. Question: Would it be right to say that Dorian is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000943", "pair_id": "u000943-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000943-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "78b0f022ce41f1f0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000943-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is postoperative. Dorian is not hypertensive. Dorian is not postoperative.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is not vaccinated, thus it is fasting. Provision 2: when the patient here is not hypertensive, thus it is allergic. Provision 3: when the patient here is vaccinated, thus it has an interpreter. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here is postoperative. Question: Would it be right to say that Dorian is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000943", "pair_id": "u000943-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000943-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2306531f508e5394", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000943-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is postoperative. Dorian is not postoperative.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is not vaccinated, it thereby is fasting. Point B. If said patient is not hypertensive, it thereby is allergic. Point C. If said patient is vaccinated, it thereby has an interpreter. Point A is cancelled if said patient is postoperative. Question: Statement: Dorian is postoperative. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000943", "pair_id": "u000943-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000943-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "78b0f022ce41f1f0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000943-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is postoperative. Dorian is not hypertensive. Dorian is not postoperative.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is not vaccinated, it thereby is fasting. Point B. If said patient is not hypertensive, it thereby is allergic. Point C. If said patient is vaccinated, it thereby has an interpreter. Point A is cancelled if said patient is postoperative. Question: Statement: Dorian is postoperative. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000943", "pair_id": "u000943-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000943-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2306531f508e5394", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000943-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is postoperative. Dorian is not postoperative.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is not vaccinated, so it is fasting. No. 2 While the given patient is not hypertensive, so it is allergic. No. 3 While the given patient is vaccinated, so it has an interpreter. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given patient is postoperative. Question: Is the claim \"Dorian is postoperative\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000943", "pair_id": "u000943-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000943-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "78b0f022ce41f1f0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000943-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is postoperative. Dorian is not hypertensive. Dorian is not postoperative.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is not vaccinated, so it is fasting. No. 2 While the given patient is not hypertensive, so it is allergic. No. 3 While the given patient is vaccinated, so it has an interpreter. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given patient is postoperative. Question: Is the claim \"Dorian is postoperative\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000943", "pair_id": "u000943-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u000943-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2306531f508e5394", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000967-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is localized. Schist is not benchmarked. Basalt is benchmarked. Basalt is localized.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is minified, that build is not reproducible. Item B. When the build is minified, that build is not documented. Item C. When the build is localized, that build is flaky. Item D. When the build is merged, that build is not signed. Item E. When the build is tagged, that build is compiled. Item F. When the build is not merged, that build is minified. Item G. When the build is benchmarked, that build is not merged. Item H. When the build is not benchmarked, that build is tagged. Item I. When the build is compiled, that build is documented. Question: Can one infer that Obsidian is documented?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000967", "pair_id": "u000967-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000967-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "eda1ce8298672360", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000967-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is benchmarked. Obsidian is localized. Schist is not benchmarked. Basalt is benchmarked. Basalt is localized.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is minified, that build is not reproducible. Item B. When the build is minified, that build is not documented. Item C. When the build is localized, that build is flaky. Item D. When the build is merged, that build is not signed. Item E. When the build is tagged, that build is compiled. Item F. When the build is not merged, that build is minified. Item G. When the build is benchmarked, that build is not merged. Item H. When the build is not benchmarked, that build is tagged. Item I. When the build is compiled, that build is documented. Question: Can one infer that Obsidian is documented?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u000967", "pair_id": "u000967-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000967-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "1d1abef99a618e52", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000990-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is multicenter. Electra is not multicenter. Nashira has a field site. Nashira is embargoed. Nashira has a team size of 51. Electra is embargoed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is not theoretical, that proposal is translational. Item B. When the proposal is translational, that proposal has seed funding. Item C. When the proposal has a team size of less than 61, that proposal is endorsed. Item D. When the proposal has no field site, that proposal is not renewed. Item E. When the proposal is not renewed, that proposal is collaborative. Item F. When the proposal is embargoed, that proposal is shortlisted. Item G. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal has a steering committee. Item H. When the proposal is collaborative, that proposal has no seed funding. Question: Can one infer that Nashira has seed funding?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u000990", "pair_id": "u000990-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000990-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "35422f07cabfee1c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u000990-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is multicenter. Electra is not multicenter. Nashira has a field site. Nashira is embargoed. Nashira has a team size of 51. Electra is embargoed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is not theoretical, that proposal is translational. Item B. When the proposal is translational, that proposal has seed funding. Item C. When the proposal has a field site, that proposal is not theoretical. Item D. When the proposal has a team size of less than 61, that proposal is endorsed. Item E. When the proposal has no field site, that proposal is not renewed. Item F. When the proposal is not renewed, that proposal is collaborative. Item G. When the proposal is embargoed, that proposal is shortlisted. Item H. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal has a steering committee. Item I. When the proposal is collaborative, that proposal has no seed funding. Question: Can one infer that Nashira has seed funding?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u000990", "pair_id": "u000990-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u000990-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "60126b0c02e90770", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001003-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not certified. Teodor has a commute radius of 31. Mads has a commute radius of 12.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is headhunted, so it is freelance. No. 2 While the given candidate is a veteran, so it is recommended. No. 3 While the given candidate is recommended, so it is not freelance. No. 4 While the given candidate is certified, so it is not licensed. No. 5 While the given candidate is onboarded, so it is a veteran. No. 6 While the given candidate is not fingerprinted, so it is headhunted. No. 7 While the given candidate has a commute radius that falls below 88, so it is fingerprinted. Question: Is the claim \"Mads is freelance\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001003", "pair_id": "u001003-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001003-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1790f9f5149a8b3d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001003-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not certified. Teodor has a commute radius of 31. Mads has a commute radius of 12.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is headhunted, so it is freelance. No. 2 While the given candidate is a veteran, so it is recommended. No. 3 While the given candidate is recommended, so it is not freelance. No. 4 While the given candidate is certified, so it is not licensed. No. 5 While the given candidate is onboarded, so it is a veteran. No. 6 While the given candidate is fingerprinted, so it is headhunted. No. 7 While the given candidate has a commute radius that falls below 88, so it is fingerprinted. Question: Is the claim \"Mads is freelance\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001003", "pair_id": "u001003-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001003-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "3df0f450feaa6166", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001030-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper has a firewall. Kestrel is not sharded. Vesper is not encrypted. Vesper has a failover node. Vesper is not sharded. Vesper is cached. Kestrel is cached. Juno is provisioned. Kestrel is provisioned.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is encrypted, then it is not throttled. (2) If a workload is provisioned and has a snapshot, then it is stateless. (3) If a workload is backed up and is encrypted, then it is not replicated. (4) If a workload is cached and is sharded and has a failover node, then it is not backed up. (5) If a workload is cached and has no failover node and has a firewall, then it is backed up. (1) is void if the workload has a firewall. (5) is void if the workload is provisioned. (2) is void if the workload has a failover node. When (5) and (4) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Vesper is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001030", "pair_id": "u001030-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001030-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d578bc40d76e3c83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u001030-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper has a firewall. Kestrel is not sharded. Vesper is not encrypted. Vesper has a failover node. Vesper is not sharded. Vesper is cached. Kestrel is cached. Juno is provisioned. Kestrel is provisioned.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is encrypted, then it is not throttled. (2) If a workload is provisioned and has a snapshot, then it is stateless. (3) If a workload is backed up and is encrypted, then it is not replicated. (4) If a workload is cached and is sharded and has a failover node, then it is not backed up. (5) If a workload is cached and has a failover node and has a firewall, then it is backed up. (1) is void if the workload has a firewall. (5) is void if the workload is provisioned. (2) is void if the workload has a failover node. When (5) and (4) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Vesper is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001030", "pair_id": "u001030-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001030-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b6484dae3d52ba9f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u001030-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper has a firewall. Kestrel is not sharded. Vesper is not encrypted. Vesper has a failover node. Vesper is not sharded. Vesper is cached. Kestrel is cached. Juno is provisioned. Kestrel is provisioned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is encrypted, it also is not throttled. Clause 2: once any workload is provisioned and also has a snapshot, it also is stateless. Clause 3: once any workload is backed up and also is encrypted, it also is not replicated. Clause 4: once any workload is cached and also is sharded and also has a failover node, it also is not backed up. Clause 5: once any workload is cached and also has no failover node and also has a firewall, it also is backed up. Clause 1 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a firewall. Clause 5 does not hold for a workload when any workload is provisioned. Clause 2 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a failover node. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Vesper is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001030", "pair_id": "u001030-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001030-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d578bc40d76e3c83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u001030-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper has a firewall. Kestrel is not sharded. Vesper is not encrypted. Vesper has a failover node. Vesper is not sharded. Vesper is cached. Kestrel is cached. Juno is provisioned. Kestrel is provisioned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is encrypted, it also is not throttled. Clause 2: once any workload is provisioned and also has a snapshot, it also is stateless. Clause 3: once any workload is backed up and also is encrypted, it also is not replicated. Clause 4: once any workload is cached and also is sharded and also has a failover node, it also is not backed up. Clause 5: once any workload is cached and also has a failover node and also has a firewall, it also is backed up. Clause 1 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a firewall. Clause 5 does not hold for a workload when any workload is provisioned. Clause 2 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a failover node. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Vesper is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001030", "pair_id": "u001030-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001030-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b6484dae3d52ba9f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u001036-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is endorsed. Hadar is a pilot study. Hadar has a steering committee. Deneb has a steering committee. Deneb is not a pilot study. Nashira is not endorsed. Hadar is not endorsed. Gemma is not endorsed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is endorsed and also is not a pilot study and also is translational, it also is not preregistered. Clause 2: once any proposal has a steering committee, it also is not exploratory. Clause 3: once any proposal has a steering committee and also is a pilot study, it also is not cofunded. Clause 4: once any proposal is endorsed and also is not a pilot study, it also is preregistered. Question: Does it follow that Deneb is preregistered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001036", "pair_id": "u001036-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001036-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "8188d342ac5c1c4b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001036-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is endorsed. Hadar is a pilot study. Hadar has a steering committee. Deneb has a steering committee. Deneb is not a pilot study. Nashira is not endorsed. Hadar is not endorsed. Gemma is not endorsed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is endorsed and also is not a pilot study and also is translational, it also is not preregistered. Clause 2: once any proposal has a steering committee, it also is not exploratory. Clause 3: once any proposal has a steering committee and also is a pilot study, it also is not cofunded. Clause 4: once any proposal is endorsed and also is a pilot study, it also is preregistered. Question: Does it follow that Deneb is preregistered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001036", "pair_id": "u001036-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001036-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "a0ded666f65c4d19", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001036-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is endorsed. Hadar is a pilot study. Hadar has a steering committee. Deneb has a steering committee. Deneb is not a pilot study. Nashira is not endorsed. Hadar is not endorsed. Gemma is not endorsed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is endorsed, and is not a pilot study, and is translational, that proposal is not preregistered. Item B. When the proposal has a steering committee, that proposal is not exploratory. Item C. When the proposal has a steering committee, and is a pilot study, that proposal is not cofunded. Item D. When the proposal is endorsed, and is not a pilot study, that proposal is preregistered. Question: Can one infer that Deneb is preregistered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001036", "pair_id": "u001036-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001036-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "8188d342ac5c1c4b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001036-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is endorsed. Hadar is a pilot study. Hadar has a steering committee. Deneb has a steering committee. Deneb is not a pilot study. Nashira is not endorsed. Hadar is not endorsed. Gemma is not endorsed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is endorsed, and is not a pilot study, and is translational, that proposal is not preregistered. Item B. When the proposal has a steering committee, that proposal is not exploratory. Item C. When the proposal has a steering committee, and is a pilot study, that proposal is not cofunded. Item D. When the proposal is endorsed, and is a pilot study, that proposal is preregistered. Question: Can one infer that Deneb is preregistered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001036", "pair_id": "u001036-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001036-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "a0ded666f65c4d19", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001042-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gneiss has a test yield of 13. Shale has a test yield of 67. Shale is not fuzzed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is reverted, it also is not localized. Clause 2: once any build is fuzzed, it also is not profiled. Clause 3: once any build has a test yield of 57 or less, it also is reverted. Clause 4: once any build is tagged, it also is reproducible. Clause 5: once any build is reverted, it also is linted. Clause 6: once any build is linted, it also has a changelog. Clause 7: once any build has a test yield over 68, it also is not tested. Clause 8: once any build has a test yield over 57, it also is flaky. Clause 9: once any build is flaky, it also is tagged. Question: Which of these is true of Shale?", "options": ["has a changelog", "is reproducible"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reproducible", "unit_id": "u001042", "pair_id": "u001042-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001042-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "dbedc2672faafeb1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001042-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gneiss has a test yield of 13. Shale has a test yield of 77. Shale is not fuzzed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is reverted, it also is not localized. Clause 2: once any build is fuzzed, it also is not profiled. Clause 3: once any build has a test yield of 57 or less, it also is reverted. Clause 4: once any build is tagged, it also is reproducible. Clause 5: once any build is reverted, it also is linted. Clause 6: once any build is linted, it also has a changelog. Clause 7: once any build has a test yield over 68, it also is not tested. Clause 8: once any build has a test yield over 57, it also is flaky. Clause 9: once any build is flaky, it also is tagged. Question: Which of these is true of Shale?", "options": ["has a changelog", "is reproducible"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reproducible", "unit_id": "u001042", "pair_id": "u001042-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001042-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "05cffba2abb3c8dc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001042-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gneiss has a test yield of 13. Shale has a test yield of 67. Shale is not fuzzed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is reverted, that build is not localized. Item B. When the build is fuzzed, that build is not profiled. Item C. When the build has a test yield of no more than 57, that build is reverted. Item D. When the build is tagged, that build is reproducible. Item E. When the build is reverted, that build is linted. Item F. When the build is linted, that build has a changelog. Item G. When the build has a test yield of more than 68, that build is not tested. Item H. When the build has a test yield of more than 57, that build is flaky. Item I. When the build is flaky, that build is tagged. Question: What applies to Shale?", "options": ["has a changelog", "is reproducible"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reproducible", "unit_id": "u001042", "pair_id": "u001042-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001042-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "dbedc2672faafeb1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001042-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gneiss has a test yield of 13. Shale has a test yield of 77. Shale is not fuzzed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is reverted, that build is not localized. Item B. When the build is fuzzed, that build is not profiled. Item C. When the build has a test yield of no more than 57, that build is reverted. Item D. When the build is tagged, that build is reproducible. Item E. When the build is reverted, that build is linted. Item F. When the build is linted, that build has a changelog. Item G. When the build has a test yield of more than 68, that build is not tested. Item H. When the build has a test yield of more than 57, that build is flaky. Item I. When the build is flaky, that build is tagged. Question: What applies to Shale?", "options": ["has a changelog", "is reproducible"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reproducible", "unit_id": "u001042", "pair_id": "u001042-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001042-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "05cffba2abb3c8dc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001060-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is multicenter. Fomalhaut is embargoed. Izar has a milestone total of 49. Fomalhaut has a milestone total of 32. Capella is multicenter. Izar has a citation index of 99. Capella has seed funding. Capella has a citation index of 7. Capella has a milestone total of 17. Capella has a team size of 80. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 85. Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Capella is embargoed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is multicenter and additionally has a citation index less than 77, it then is interdisciplinary. #2 Each time a proposal has a milestone total less than 43 and additionally is multicenter, it then has a postdoc. #3 Each time a proposal has seed funding and additionally has a team size of 79 or below, it then is resubmitted. #4 Each time a proposal is longitudinal and additionally has a team size less than 36 and additionally has a postdoc, it then is cofunded. #5 Each time a proposal has a citation index less than 39, it then is translational. #6 Each time a proposal has a citation index less than 39, it then is longitudinal. #7 Each time a proposal is longitudinal and additionally has a team size of 36 or above and additionally is multicenter, it then is not cofunded. #3 is set aside if a proposal is multicenter. #6 is set aside if a proposal is not embargoed. Question: Do the terms above show that Capella is cofunded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001060", "pair_id": "u001060-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001060-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d1538b17facfee34", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u001060-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is multicenter. Fomalhaut is embargoed. Izar has a milestone total of 49. Fomalhaut has a milestone total of 32. Capella is multicenter. Izar has a citation index of 99. Capella has seed funding. Capella has a citation index of 7. Capella has a milestone total of 17. Capella has a team size of 80. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 85. Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Capella is embargoed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is multicenter and additionally has a citation index less than 77, it then is interdisciplinary. #2 Each time a proposal has a milestone total less than 43 and additionally is multicenter, it then has a postdoc. #3 Each time a proposal has seed funding and additionally has a team size of 79 or below, it then is resubmitted. #4 Each time a proposal is longitudinal and additionally has a team size less than 36 and additionally has a postdoc, it then is cofunded. #5 Each time a proposal has a citation index of 39 or above, it then is translational. #6 Each time a proposal has a citation index less than 39, it then is longitudinal. #7 Each time a proposal is longitudinal and additionally has a team size of 36 or above and additionally is multicenter, it then is not cofunded. #3 is set aside if a proposal is multicenter. #6 is set aside if a proposal is not embargoed. Question: Do the terms above show that Capella is cofunded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001060", "pair_id": "u001060-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001060-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f7e515c3075f9a2f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u001078-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma is collaborative. Gemma is not interdisciplinary. Deneb is not interdisciplinary. Deneb has a postdoc. Deneb is not collaborative. Gemma is translational. Gemma has no postdoc. Deneb is theoretical. Gemma is theoretical. Gemma is renewed. Gemma is not longitudinal. Gemma is multicenter.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is resubmitted and is theoretical and is not longitudinal, then it is not peer reviewed. (2) If a proposal is interdisciplinary and has a postdoc, then it is not cofunded. (3) If a proposal is resubmitted and is theoretical and is renewed, then it is embargoed. (4) If a proposal is collaborative and is multicenter, then it is resubmitted. (5) If a proposal is resubmitted and is translational and is multicenter, then it is not embargoed. (5) is void if the proposal is multicenter and is renewed. (2) is void if the proposal is collaborative. Question: Is it true that Gemma is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001078", "pair_id": "u001078-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/2/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001078-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "87de7c23ff14a72c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001078-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma is collaborative. Gemma is not interdisciplinary. Deneb is not interdisciplinary. Deneb has a postdoc. Deneb is not collaborative. Gemma is translational. Gemma has no postdoc. Deneb is theoretical. Gemma is theoretical. Gemma is renewed. Gemma is not longitudinal. Gemma is multicenter.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is resubmitted and is theoretical and is longitudinal, then it is not peer reviewed. (2) If a proposal is interdisciplinary and has a postdoc, then it is not cofunded. (3) If a proposal is resubmitted and is theoretical and is renewed, then it is embargoed. (4) If a proposal is collaborative and is multicenter, then it is resubmitted. (5) If a proposal is resubmitted and is translational and is multicenter, then it is not embargoed. (5) is void if the proposal is multicenter and is renewed. (2) is void if the proposal is collaborative. Question: Is it true that Gemma is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001078", "pair_id": "u001078-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/2/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001078-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d3f4ebfca2a9519a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001078-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma is collaborative. Gemma is not interdisciplinary. Deneb is not interdisciplinary. Deneb has a postdoc. Deneb is not collaborative. Gemma is translational. Gemma has no postdoc. Deneb is theoretical. Gemma is theoretical. Gemma is renewed. Gemma is not longitudinal. Gemma is multicenter.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is resubmitted and also is theoretical and also is not longitudinal, it also is not peer reviewed. Clause 2: once any proposal is interdisciplinary and also has a postdoc, it also is not cofunded. Clause 3: once any proposal is resubmitted and also is theoretical and also is renewed, it also is embargoed. Clause 4: once any proposal is collaborative and also is multicenter, it also is resubmitted. Clause 5: once any proposal is resubmitted and also is translational and also is multicenter, it also is not embargoed. Clause 5 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is multicenter and also is renewed. Clause 2 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is collaborative. Question: Does it follow that Gemma is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001078", "pair_id": "u001078-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/2/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001078-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "87de7c23ff14a72c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001078-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma is collaborative. Gemma is not interdisciplinary. Deneb is not interdisciplinary. Deneb has a postdoc. Deneb is not collaborative. Gemma is translational. Gemma has no postdoc. Deneb is theoretical. Gemma is theoretical. Gemma is renewed. Gemma is not longitudinal. Gemma is multicenter.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is resubmitted and also is theoretical and also is longitudinal, it also is not peer reviewed. Clause 2: once any proposal is interdisciplinary and also has a postdoc, it also is not cofunded. Clause 3: once any proposal is resubmitted and also is theoretical and also is renewed, it also is embargoed. Clause 4: once any proposal is collaborative and also is multicenter, it also is resubmitted. Clause 5: once any proposal is resubmitted and also is translational and also is multicenter, it also is not embargoed. Clause 5 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is multicenter and also is renewed. Clause 2 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is collaborative. Question: Does it follow that Gemma is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001078", "pair_id": "u001078-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/2/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001078-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d3f4ebfca2a9519a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001123-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hamid is refinanced. Greta is solvent. Hamid is delinquent. Hamid is not audited. Hamid is not garnished. Greta has a mortgage. Wiebke is solvent. Hamid is creditworthy. Wiebke has no lien. Wiebke is not vetted. Hamid is foreclosed. Hamid has no mortgage. Wiebke is not audited. Greta is creditworthy. Wiebke has a mortgage. Wiebke is not employed. Greta is not employed. Greta is vetted. Wiebke is not delinquent. Greta has no lien. Greta is not audited. Greta is garnished. Greta is foreclosed. Greta is not a depositor. Greta is delinquent. Wiebke is garnished.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no escrow account provided that it is a depositor. Section 2: a borrower is prequalified provided that it has collateral as well as has a lien. Section 3: a borrower is amortized provided that it has collateral as well as is refinanced. Section 4: a borrower has collateral provided that it has a mortgage as well as is solvent. Section 5: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it has collateral as well as is foreclosed as well as is vetted. Section 6: a borrower is not prequalified provided that it is employed. Section 7: a borrower is indebted provided that it has collateral as well as is employed as well as is delinquent. Section 8: a borrower is underwritten provided that it has collateral as well as is audited. Section 9: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it has collateral as well as is garnished. Section 10: a borrower is not bankrupt provided that it is creditworthy as well as is garnished. Section 11: a borrower is bankrupt provided that it is overdrawn. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it is garnished. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it is audited. Section 9 lapses for a borrower if it is foreclosed. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 11 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 9. Question: Which statement fits Greta?", "options": ["is underwritten", "is a homeowner", "is indebted", "is amortized", "is prequalified", "has an escrow account"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is a homeowner", "unit_id": "u001123", "pair_id": "u001123-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/23", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001123-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b008e47e1cd66cf4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a1", "a18", "a12", "a8", "a6"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u001123-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hamid is refinanced. Greta is solvent. Hamid is delinquent. Hamid is not audited. Hamid is not garnished. Greta has a mortgage. Wiebke is solvent. Hamid is creditworthy. Wiebke has no lien. Wiebke is not vetted. Hamid is foreclosed. Hamid has no mortgage. Wiebke is not audited. Greta is creditworthy. Wiebke has a mortgage. Wiebke is not employed. Greta is not employed. Greta is vetted. Wiebke is not delinquent. Greta has no lien. Greta is not audited. Greta is garnished. Greta is foreclosed. Greta is overdrawn. Greta is not a depositor. Greta is delinquent. Wiebke is garnished.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no escrow account provided that it is a depositor. Section 2: a borrower is prequalified provided that it has collateral as well as has a lien. Section 3: a borrower is amortized provided that it has collateral as well as is refinanced. Section 4: a borrower has collateral provided that it has a mortgage as well as is solvent. Section 5: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it has collateral as well as is foreclosed as well as is vetted. Section 6: a borrower is not prequalified provided that it is employed. Section 7: a borrower is indebted provided that it has collateral as well as is employed as well as is delinquent. Section 8: a borrower is underwritten provided that it has collateral as well as is audited. Section 9: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it has collateral as well as is garnished. Section 10: a borrower is not bankrupt provided that it is creditworthy as well as is garnished. Section 11: a borrower is bankrupt provided that it is overdrawn. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it is garnished. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it is audited. Section 9 lapses for a borrower if it is foreclosed. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 11 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 9. Question: Which statement fits Greta?", "options": ["is underwritten", "is a homeowner", "is indebted", "is amortized", "is prequalified", "has an escrow account"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is a homeowner", "unit_id": "u001123", "pair_id": "u001123-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/23", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001123-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bf00fb29d50b8246", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a1", "a18", "a12", "a8", "a6"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u001144-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is not provisioned. Borealis has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is not backed up, so it has a failover node. No. 2 While the given workload has no dedicated host, so it has no failover node. No. 3 While the given workload is not backed up, so it is not replicated. No. 4 While the given workload is provisioned, so it is not monitored. Question: Is the claim \"Borealis has a failover node\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001144", "pair_id": "u001144-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001144-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "2678543a272bcde3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001144-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is not provisioned. Borealis has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is not backed up, so it has a failover node. No. 2 While the given workload has no dedicated host, so it has no failover node. No. 3 While the given workload is not backed up, so it is not replicated. No. 4 While the given workload is not provisioned, so it is not monitored. Question: Is the claim \"Borealis has a failover node\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001144", "pair_id": "u001144-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001144-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "15b7d16f7e2ecd19", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001213-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale has a lint backlog of 13. Shale is backported. Feldspar is backported. Galena has a migration script. Feldspar has a patch cycle of 52. Galena is not backported.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build has a patch cycle of 22 or less, it also is signed. Clause 1 does not hold for a build when any build has a lint backlog over 63. Question: Does it follow that Galena is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001213", "pair_id": "u001213-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001213-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0e21a4491f00b8de", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001213-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale has a lint backlog of 13. Shale is backported. Feldspar is backported. Galena has no migration script. Feldspar has a patch cycle of 52. Galena is not backported.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build has a patch cycle of 22 or less, it also is signed. Clause 1 does not hold for a build when any build has a lint backlog over 63. Question: Does it follow that Galena is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001213", "pair_id": "u001213-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001213-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "246ca7c0becbdd50", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001213-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale has a lint backlog of 13. Shale is backported. Feldspar is backported. Galena has a migration script. Feldspar has a patch cycle of 52. Galena is not backported.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a patch cycle of no more than 22, that build is signed. Item A is suspended when the build has a lint backlog of more than 63. Question: Can one infer that Galena is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001213", "pair_id": "u001213-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001213-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0e21a4491f00b8de", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001213-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale has a lint backlog of 13. Shale is backported. Feldspar is backported. Galena has no migration script. Feldspar has a patch cycle of 52. Galena is not backported.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a patch cycle of no more than 22, that build is signed. Item A is suspended when the build has a lint backlog of more than 63. Question: Can one infer that Galena is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001213", "pair_id": "u001213-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001213-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "246ca7c0becbdd50", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001233-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor has no waybill. Mirela has a waybill. Nandor is not perishable. Odile has a waybill. Nandor has no courier. Nandor is consolidated.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is not palletized, then it is oversized. (2) If a parcel is not perishable, then it is not palletized. (3) If a parcel is oversized and has no courier, then it is not sealed. (4) If a parcel is consolidated, then it is not stamped. (5) If a parcel is oversized and has a courier, then it is sealed. (6) If a parcel has a waybill, then it is stamped. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Nandor is sealed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001233", "pair_id": "u001233-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001233-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9fffc717221af08a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u001233-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor has no waybill. Mirela has a waybill. Nandor is not perishable. Odile has a waybill. Nandor has no courier. Nandor is consolidated.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is not palletized, then it is oversized. (2) If a parcel is perishable, then it is not palletized. (3) If a parcel is oversized and has no courier, then it is not sealed. (4) If a parcel is consolidated, then it is not stamped. (5) If a parcel is oversized and has a courier, then it is sealed. (6) If a parcel has a waybill, then it is stamped. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Nandor is sealed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001233", "pair_id": "u001233-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001233-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "dff1f5294986995a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u001233-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor has no waybill. Mirela has a waybill. Nandor is not perishable. Odile has a waybill. Nandor has no courier. Nandor is consolidated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is not palletized, it also is oversized. Clause 2: once any parcel is not perishable, it also is not palletized. Clause 3: once any parcel is oversized and also has no courier, it also is not sealed. Clause 4: once any parcel is consolidated, it also is not stamped. Clause 5: once any parcel is oversized and also has a courier, it also is sealed. Clause 6: once any parcel has a waybill, it also is stamped. Clause 4 overrides Clause 6. Clause 3 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Nandor is sealed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001233", "pair_id": "u001233-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001233-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9fffc717221af08a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u001233-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor has no waybill. Mirela has a waybill. Nandor is not perishable. Odile has a waybill. Nandor has no courier. Nandor is consolidated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is not palletized, it also is oversized. Clause 2: once any parcel is perishable, it also is not palletized. Clause 3: once any parcel is oversized and also has no courier, it also is not sealed. Clause 4: once any parcel is consolidated, it also is not stamped. Clause 5: once any parcel is oversized and also has a courier, it also is sealed. Clause 6: once any parcel has a waybill, it also is stamped. Clause 4 overrides Clause 6. Clause 3 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Nandor is sealed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001233", "pair_id": "u001233-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001233-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "dff1f5294986995a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u001237-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has no courier. Mirela is sealed. Mirela is delayed. Mirela is not labeled.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is scanned provided that it is delayed. Section 2: a parcel is perishable provided that it has a waybill. Section 3: a parcel is not perishable provided that it has a waybill. Section 4: a parcel is hazardous provided that it has no courier. Section 2 lapses for a parcel if it is not labeled. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it is not sealed. Section 2 lapses for a parcel if it is sealed. Question: Mirela is perishable. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001237", "pair_id": "u001237-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001237-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1a7efef7fc8186cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u001237-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has no courier. Mirela is sealed. Mirela is delayed. Mirela is not labeled.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is scanned provided that it is delayed. Section 2: a parcel is perishable provided that it has a waybill. Section 3: a parcel is not perishable provided that it has a waybill. Section 4: a parcel has a waybill provided that it is hazardous. Section 5: a parcel is hazardous provided that it has no courier. Section 2 lapses for a parcel if it is not labeled. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it is not sealed. Section 2 lapses for a parcel if it is sealed. Question: Mirela is perishable. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001237", "pair_id": "u001237-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001237-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a70f97af13f534e7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u001237-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has no courier. Mirela is sealed. Mirela is delayed. Mirela is not labeled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it is scanned. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a waybill: then it is perishable. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a waybill: then it is not perishable. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has no courier: then it is hazardous. Policy II is waived if that parcel is not labeled. Policy III is waived if that parcel is not sealed. Policy II is waived if that parcel is sealed. Question: Is it so that Mirela is perishable?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001237", "pair_id": "u001237-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001237-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1a7efef7fc8186cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u001237-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has no courier. Mirela is sealed. Mirela is delayed. Mirela is not labeled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it is scanned. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a waybill: then it is perishable. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a waybill: then it is not perishable. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is hazardous: then it has a waybill. Policy V. Suppose that parcel has no courier: then it is hazardous. Policy II is waived if that parcel is not labeled. Policy III is waived if that parcel is not sealed. Policy II is waived if that parcel is sealed. Question: Is it so that Mirela is perishable?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001237", "pair_id": "u001237-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001237-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a70f97af13f534e7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u001237-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has no courier. Mirela is sealed. Mirela is delayed. Mirela is not labeled.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then is scanned. #2 Each time a parcel has a waybill, it then is perishable. #3 Each time a parcel has a waybill, it then is not perishable. #4 Each time a parcel has no courier, it then is hazardous. #2 is set aside if a parcel is not labeled. #3 is set aside if a parcel is not sealed. #2 is set aside if a parcel is sealed. Question: Do the terms above show that Mirela is perishable?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001237", "pair_id": "u001237-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001237-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1a7efef7fc8186cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u001237-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has no courier. Mirela is sealed. Mirela is delayed. Mirela is not labeled.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then is scanned. #2 Each time a parcel has a waybill, it then is perishable. #3 Each time a parcel has a waybill, it then is not perishable. #4 Each time a parcel is hazardous, it then has a waybill. #5 Each time a parcel has no courier, it then is hazardous. #2 is set aside if a parcel is not labeled. #3 is set aside if a parcel is not sealed. #2 is set aside if a parcel is sealed. Question: Do the terms above show that Mirela is perishable?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001237", "pair_id": "u001237-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001237-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a70f97af13f534e7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u001304-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kochab has a team size of 0. Kochab is exploratory. Electra is exploratory. Electra is peer reviewed. Electra is cofunded. Electra is renewed. Electra has a team size of 26.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has a team size under 32, it also has industry backing. Clause 2: once any proposal is preregistered, it also is collaborative. Clause 3: once any proposal has no field site, it also is multicenter. Clause 4: once any proposal is exploratory, it also is not theoretical. Clause 5: once any proposal is not renewed, it also is not longitudinal. Clause 6: once any proposal is renewed, it also has seed funding. Clause 7: once any proposal is cofunded, it also is not multicenter. Clause 8: once any proposal has no ethics clearance, it also is not a pilot study. Clause 9: once any proposal is a pilot study, it also is preregistered. Clause 10: once any proposal has no industry backing, it also has no field site. Clause 11: once any proposal is not peer reviewed, it also has no industry backing. Clause 12: once any proposal is peer reviewed, it also is theoretical. Clause 13: once any proposal is peer reviewed, it also is a pilot study. Clause 3 overrides Clause 7. Clause 12 overrides Clause 4. Clause 11 overrides Clause 1. Clause 13 overrides Clause 8. Question: Which of these is true of Electra?", "options": ["is collaborative", "is multicenter"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is collaborative", "unit_id": "u001304", "pair_id": "u001304-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001304-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "69a687554eb59e5d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001304-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kochab has a team size of 0. Kochab is exploratory. Electra is exploratory. Electra is peer reviewed. Electra is not cofunded. Electra is renewed. Electra has a team size of 26.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has a team size under 32, it also has industry backing. Clause 2: once any proposal is preregistered, it also is collaborative. Clause 3: once any proposal has no field site, it also is multicenter. Clause 4: once any proposal is exploratory, it also is not theoretical. Clause 5: once any proposal is not renewed, it also is not longitudinal. Clause 6: once any proposal is renewed, it also has seed funding. Clause 7: once any proposal is cofunded, it also is not multicenter. Clause 8: once any proposal has no ethics clearance, it also is not a pilot study. Clause 9: once any proposal is a pilot study, it also is preregistered. Clause 10: once any proposal has no industry backing, it also has no field site. Clause 11: once any proposal is not peer reviewed, it also has no industry backing. Clause 12: once any proposal is peer reviewed, it also is theoretical. Clause 13: once any proposal is peer reviewed, it also is a pilot study. Clause 3 overrides Clause 7. Clause 12 overrides Clause 4. Clause 11 overrides Clause 1. Clause 13 overrides Clause 8. Question: Which of these is true of Electra?", "options": ["is collaborative", "is multicenter"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is collaborative", "unit_id": "u001304", "pair_id": "u001304-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001304-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9a3133de3546d1af", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001304-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kochab has a team size of 0. Kochab is exploratory. Electra is exploratory. Electra is peer reviewed. Electra is cofunded. Electra is renewed. Electra has a team size of 26.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has a team size of less than 32, that proposal has industry backing. Item B. When the proposal is preregistered, that proposal is collaborative. Item C. When the proposal has no field site, that proposal is multicenter. Item D. When the proposal is exploratory, that proposal is not theoretical. Item E. When the proposal is not renewed, that proposal is not longitudinal. Item F. When the proposal is renewed, that proposal has seed funding. Item G. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is not multicenter. Item H. When the proposal has no ethics clearance, that proposal is not a pilot study. Item I. When the proposal is a pilot study, that proposal is preregistered. Item J. When the proposal has no industry backing, that proposal has no field site. Item K. When the proposal is not peer reviewed, that proposal has no industry backing. Item L. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal is theoretical. Item M. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal is a pilot study. Item C outranks Item G. Item L outranks Item D. Item K outranks Item A. Item M outranks Item H. Question: What applies to Electra?", "options": ["is collaborative", "is multicenter"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is collaborative", "unit_id": "u001304", "pair_id": "u001304-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001304-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "69a687554eb59e5d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001304-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kochab has a team size of 0. Kochab is exploratory. Electra is exploratory. Electra is peer reviewed. Electra is not cofunded. Electra is renewed. Electra has a team size of 26.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has a team size of less than 32, that proposal has industry backing. Item B. When the proposal is preregistered, that proposal is collaborative. Item C. When the proposal has no field site, that proposal is multicenter. Item D. When the proposal is exploratory, that proposal is not theoretical. Item E. When the proposal is not renewed, that proposal is not longitudinal. Item F. When the proposal is renewed, that proposal has seed funding. Item G. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is not multicenter. Item H. When the proposal has no ethics clearance, that proposal is not a pilot study. Item I. When the proposal is a pilot study, that proposal is preregistered. Item J. When the proposal has no industry backing, that proposal has no field site. Item K. When the proposal is not peer reviewed, that proposal has no industry backing. Item L. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal is theoretical. Item M. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal is a pilot study. Item C outranks Item G. Item L outranks Item D. Item K outranks Item A. Item M outranks Item H. Question: What applies to Electra?", "options": ["is collaborative", "is multicenter"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is collaborative", "unit_id": "u001304", "pair_id": "u001304-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001304-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9a3133de3546d1af", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001337-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not a homeowner. Ingrid is not solvent. Hamid is not a homeowner. Hamid is not pensioned. Hamid has a lien. Ingrid is not pensioned. Hamid is solvent. Ingrid is a homeowner. Ingrid has a lien.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has an escrow account, thus it has no cosigner. Provision 2: when the borrower here is prequalified, thus it is underwritten. Provision 3: when the borrower here is a depositor, thus it is prequalified. Provision 4: when the borrower here is employed, thus it has an escrow account. Provision 5: when the borrower here has an escrow account, thus it is not underwritten. Provision 6: when the borrower here is a homeowner, thus it is employed. Provision 7: when the borrower here is pensioned, thus it has collateral. Provision 8: when the borrower here is solvent, thus it is a depositor. Question: Would it be right to say that Ingrid is underwritten?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001337", "pair_id": "u001337-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001337-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "42e46c51da981ec7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001337-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not a homeowner. Ingrid is not solvent. Hamid is not a homeowner. Hamid is not pensioned. Hamid has a lien. Ingrid is not pensioned. Hamid is solvent. Ingrid is a homeowner. Ingrid has a lien.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has an escrow account, thus it has no cosigner. Provision 2: when the borrower here is prequalified, thus it is underwritten. Provision 3: when the borrower here is a depositor, thus it is prequalified. Provision 4: when the borrower here is employed, thus it has an escrow account. Provision 5: when the borrower here has an escrow account, thus it is not underwritten. Provision 6: when the borrower here is a homeowner, thus it is employed. Provision 7: when the borrower here has a lien, thus it is not foreclosed. Provision 8: when the borrower here is pensioned, thus it has collateral. Provision 9: when the borrower here is solvent, thus it is a depositor. Question: Would it be right to say that Ingrid is underwritten?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001337", "pair_id": "u001337-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001337-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "3ce374bfd3abe31c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001337-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not a homeowner. Ingrid is not solvent. Hamid is not a homeowner. Hamid is not pensioned. Hamid has a lien. Ingrid is not pensioned. Hamid is solvent. Ingrid is a homeowner. Ingrid has a lien.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has an escrow account, it thereby has no cosigner. Point B. If said borrower is prequalified, it thereby is underwritten. Point C. If said borrower is a depositor, it thereby is prequalified. Point D. If said borrower is employed, it thereby has an escrow account. Point E. If said borrower has an escrow account, it thereby is not underwritten. Point F. If said borrower is a homeowner, it thereby is employed. Point G. If said borrower is pensioned, it thereby has collateral. Point H. If said borrower is solvent, it thereby is a depositor. Question: Statement: Ingrid is underwritten. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001337", "pair_id": "u001337-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001337-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "42e46c51da981ec7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001337-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not a homeowner. Ingrid is not solvent. Hamid is not a homeowner. Hamid is not pensioned. Hamid has a lien. Ingrid is not pensioned. Hamid is solvent. Ingrid is a homeowner. Ingrid has a lien.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has an escrow account, it thereby has no cosigner. Point B. If said borrower is prequalified, it thereby is underwritten. Point C. If said borrower is a depositor, it thereby is prequalified. Point D. If said borrower is employed, it thereby has an escrow account. Point E. If said borrower has an escrow account, it thereby is not underwritten. Point F. If said borrower is a homeowner, it thereby is employed. Point G. If said borrower has a lien, it thereby is not foreclosed. Point H. If said borrower is pensioned, it thereby has collateral. Point I. If said borrower is solvent, it thereby is a depositor. Question: Statement: Ingrid is underwritten. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001337", "pair_id": "u001337-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001337-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "3ce374bfd3abe31c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001337-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not a homeowner. Ingrid is not solvent. Hamid is not a homeowner. Hamid is not pensioned. Hamid has a lien. Ingrid is not pensioned. Hamid is solvent. Ingrid is a homeowner. Ingrid has a lien.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has an escrow account, so it has no cosigner. No. 2 While the given borrower is prequalified, so it is underwritten. No. 3 While the given borrower is a depositor, so it is prequalified. No. 4 While the given borrower is employed, so it has an escrow account. No. 5 While the given borrower has an escrow account, so it is not underwritten. No. 6 While the given borrower is a homeowner, so it is employed. No. 7 While the given borrower is pensioned, so it has collateral. No. 8 While the given borrower is solvent, so it is a depositor. Question: Is the claim \"Ingrid is underwritten\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001337", "pair_id": "u001337-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001337-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "42e46c51da981ec7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001337-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not a homeowner. Ingrid is not solvent. Hamid is not a homeowner. Hamid is not pensioned. Hamid has a lien. Ingrid is not pensioned. Hamid is solvent. Ingrid is a homeowner. Ingrid has a lien.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has an escrow account, so it has no cosigner. No. 2 While the given borrower is prequalified, so it is underwritten. No. 3 While the given borrower is a depositor, so it is prequalified. No. 4 While the given borrower is employed, so it has an escrow account. No. 5 While the given borrower has an escrow account, so it is not underwritten. No. 6 While the given borrower is a homeowner, so it is employed. No. 7 While the given borrower has a lien, so it is not foreclosed. No. 8 While the given borrower is pensioned, so it has collateral. No. 9 While the given borrower is solvent, so it is a depositor. Question: Is the claim \"Ingrid is underwritten\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001337", "pair_id": "u001337-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001337-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "3ce374bfd3abe31c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001401-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a repayment grade of 84. Ilse is amortized. Ilse is not delinquent. Ilse has no collateral.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is employed, thus it is not a homeowner. Provision 2: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it has a mortgage. Provision 3: when the borrower here has collateral, thus it has no mortgage. Provision 4: when the borrower here is foreclosed, thus it is employed. Provision 5: when the borrower here has a repayment grade at or above 68, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 6: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it has no cosigner. Provision 7: when the borrower here has a mortgage, thus it is a homeowner. Provision 8: when the borrower here is delinquent, thus it is refinanced. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Ilse is a homeowner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001401", "pair_id": "u001401-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/8", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001401-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fa77fe7b0eb60478", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001401-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a repayment grade of 84. Ilse is amortized. Ilse is not delinquent. Ilse has no collateral.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is employed, thus it is not a homeowner. Provision 2: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it has a mortgage. Provision 3: when the borrower here has collateral, thus it has no mortgage. Provision 4: when the borrower here is foreclosed, thus it is employed. Provision 5: when the borrower here has a repayment grade at or above 68, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 6: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it has no cosigner. Provision 7: when the borrower here has a mortgage, thus it is a homeowner. Provision 8: when the borrower here is delinquent, thus it is refinanced. Provision 9: when the borrower here is amortized, thus it has a lien. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Ilse is a homeowner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001401", "pair_id": "u001401-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/8", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001401-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6d71a6a4f573b2cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001401-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a repayment grade of 84. Ilse is amortized. Ilse is not delinquent. Ilse has no collateral.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is employed, it thereby is not a homeowner. Point B. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby has a mortgage. Point C. If said borrower has collateral, it thereby has no mortgage. Point D. If said borrower is foreclosed, it thereby is employed. Point E. If said borrower has a repayment grade of minimum 68, it thereby is foreclosed. Point F. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby has no cosigner. Point G. If said borrower has a mortgage, it thereby is a homeowner. Point H. If said borrower is delinquent, it thereby is refinanced. Point C supersedes Point B. Point G supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Ilse is a homeowner. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001401", "pair_id": "u001401-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/8", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001401-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fa77fe7b0eb60478", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001401-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a repayment grade of 84. Ilse is amortized. Ilse is not delinquent. Ilse has no collateral.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is employed, it thereby is not a homeowner. Point B. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby has a mortgage. Point C. If said borrower has collateral, it thereby has no mortgage. Point D. If said borrower is foreclosed, it thereby is employed. Point E. If said borrower has a repayment grade of minimum 68, it thereby is foreclosed. Point F. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby has no cosigner. Point G. If said borrower has a mortgage, it thereby is a homeowner. Point H. If said borrower is delinquent, it thereby is refinanced. Point I. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby has a lien. Point C supersedes Point B. Point G supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Ilse is a homeowner. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001401", "pair_id": "u001401-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/8", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001401-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6d71a6a4f573b2cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001433-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo has a deductible waiver. Edda is lapsed. Xaver is a smoker. Xaver is retired. Xaver is disputed. Viggo is not inspected. Viggo is not a smoker. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo is not lapsed. Viggo has no beneficiary. Xaver has a beneficiary. Edda has a rider. Xaver has a dashcam. Viggo has no flood coverage. Xaver is reinstated. Xaver is lapsed. Xaver is reimbursed. Xaver has flood coverage.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is a claimant and further is reinstated, it thereby has an adjuster. Point B. If said policyholder has an adjuster and further has no beneficiary and further has a premium discount, it thereby is not subrogated. Point C. If said policyholder is lapsed and further is reinstated, it thereby has roadside assistance. Point D. If said policyholder has an adjuster and further has a beneficiary and further has no dashcam, it thereby is subrogated. Point E. If said policyholder has flood coverage and further is not disputed, it thereby is a claimant. Point F. If said policyholder is retired and further has no flood coverage and further is not reimbursed, it thereby is indemnified. Point G. If said policyholder is not reinstated, it thereby is covered. Point H. If said policyholder has no rider and further is a smoker and further has a deductible waiver, it thereby is not a claimant. Point F is cancelled if said policyholder is a smoker. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is a smoker and further is disputed. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder has a premium discount and further has no flood coverage. Point C is cancelled if said policyholder has a dashcam. Point G is cancelled if said policyholder is not inspected. Point H supersedes Point E. Point B supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Xaver is not subrogated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001433", "pair_id": "u001433-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001433-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "73fa9fd858185169", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001433-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo has a deductible waiver. Edda is lapsed. Xaver is a smoker. Xaver is retired. Xaver is disputed. Viggo is not inspected. Viggo is not a smoker. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo is not lapsed. Viggo has no beneficiary. Xaver has a beneficiary. Edda has a rider. Xaver has no dashcam. Viggo has no flood coverage. Xaver is reinstated. Xaver is lapsed. Xaver is reimbursed. Xaver has flood coverage.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is a claimant and further is reinstated, it thereby has an adjuster. Point B. If said policyholder has an adjuster and further has no beneficiary and further has a premium discount, it thereby is not subrogated. Point C. If said policyholder is lapsed and further is reinstated, it thereby has roadside assistance. Point D. If said policyholder has an adjuster and further has a beneficiary and further has no dashcam, it thereby is subrogated. Point E. If said policyholder has flood coverage and further is not disputed, it thereby is a claimant. Point F. If said policyholder is retired and further has no flood coverage and further is not reimbursed, it thereby is indemnified. Point G. If said policyholder is not reinstated, it thereby is covered. Point H. If said policyholder has no rider and further is a smoker and further has a deductible waiver, it thereby is not a claimant. Point F is cancelled if said policyholder is a smoker. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is a smoker and further is disputed. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder has a premium discount and further has no flood coverage. Point C is cancelled if said policyholder has a dashcam. Point G is cancelled if said policyholder is not inspected. Point H supersedes Point E. Point B supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Xaver is not subrogated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001433", "pair_id": "u001433-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001433-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fd9501bfbc20cc3d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001471-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is not palletized. Nandor is fragile.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is fragile, thus it is not rerouted. Provision 2: when the parcel here is fragile, thus it is not oversized. Provision 3: when the parcel here is not palletized, thus it is oversized. Provision 4: when the parcel here is fragile, thus it is rerouted. Provision 4 has no effect when the parcel here has a parcel volume beneath 51. Provision 1 has no effect when the parcel here has a parcel volume at or above 51. Provision 4 has no effect when the parcel here is hazardous. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is not fragile. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Nandor is rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001471", "pair_id": "u001471-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001471-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "22faa52a39207305", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u001471-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is not palletized. Nandor is fragile.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is fragile, thus it is not rerouted. Provision 2: when the parcel here is not fragile, thus it is not oversized. Provision 3: when the parcel here is not palletized, thus it is oversized. Provision 4: when the parcel here is fragile, thus it is rerouted. Provision 4 has no effect when the parcel here has a parcel volume beneath 51. Provision 1 has no effect when the parcel here has a parcel volume at or above 51. Provision 4 has no effect when the parcel here is hazardous. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is not fragile. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Nandor is rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001471", "pair_id": "u001471-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001471-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9e2529fe8b5bccdd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u001471-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is not palletized. Nandor is fragile.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is fragile, so it is not rerouted. No. 2 While the given parcel is fragile, so it is not oversized. No. 3 While the given parcel is not palletized, so it is oversized. No. 4 While the given parcel is fragile, so it is rerouted. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given parcel has a parcel volume that falls below 51. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given parcel has a parcel volume not below 51. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given parcel is hazardous. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given parcel is not fragile. No. 1 wins over No. 4. No. 2 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Nandor is rerouted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001471", "pair_id": "u001471-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001471-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "22faa52a39207305", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u001471-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is not palletized. Nandor is fragile.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is fragile, so it is not rerouted. No. 2 While the given parcel is not fragile, so it is not oversized. No. 3 While the given parcel is not palletized, so it is oversized. No. 4 While the given parcel is fragile, so it is rerouted. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given parcel has a parcel volume that falls below 51. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given parcel has a parcel volume not below 51. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given parcel is hazardous. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given parcel is not fragile. No. 1 wins over No. 4. No. 2 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Nandor is rerouted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001471", "pair_id": "u001471-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001471-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9e2529fe8b5bccdd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u001477-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nashira is not longitudinal. Nashira is not shortlisted. Nashira is not budgeted. Capella is not budgeted. Nashira has a review mark of 10. Mirach is shortlisted. Mirach is not a pilot study. Mirach is not resubmitted. Mirach is endorsed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has a review mark beyond 45, thus it is exploratory. Provision 2: when the proposal here is budgeted, thus it is renewed. Provision 3: when the proposal here is not endorsed, thus it has a field site. Provision 4: when the proposal here is endorsed, thus it is translational. Provision 5: when the proposal here is resubmitted, thus it is interdisciplinary. Provision 6: when the proposal here is longitudinal, thus it has a patent filing. Provision 7: when the proposal here has a citation index at or above 20, thus it has no field site. Provision 8: when the proposal here is a pilot study, thus it is multicenter. Provision 9: when the proposal here is shortlisted, thus it is not interdisciplinary. Provision 10: when the proposal here is not budgeted, thus it is theoretical. Provision 1 has no effect when the proposal here is resubmitted. Provision 1 has no effect when the proposal here has a review mark at or below 18. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Which one describes Mirach?", "options": ["is theoretical", "is renewed", "is translational", "has a patent filing", "is interdisciplinary", "is exploratory", "has a field site"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is translational", "unit_id": "u001477", "pair_id": "u001477-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001477-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "36f21c9ff01c29c9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a7", "a4", "a5", "a14", "a11", "a0", "a8"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001477-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nashira is not longitudinal. Nashira is not shortlisted. Nashira is not budgeted. Capella is not budgeted. Nashira has a review mark of 10. Mirach is shortlisted. Mirach is not a pilot study. Mirach is not resubmitted. Mirach is not endorsed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has a review mark beyond 45, thus it is exploratory. Provision 2: when the proposal here is budgeted, thus it is renewed. Provision 3: when the proposal here is not endorsed, thus it has a field site. Provision 4: when the proposal here is endorsed, thus it is translational. Provision 5: when the proposal here is resubmitted, thus it is interdisciplinary. Provision 6: when the proposal here is longitudinal, thus it has a patent filing. Provision 7: when the proposal here has a citation index at or above 20, thus it has no field site. Provision 8: when the proposal here is a pilot study, thus it is multicenter. Provision 9: when the proposal here is shortlisted, thus it is not interdisciplinary. Provision 10: when the proposal here is not budgeted, thus it is theoretical. Provision 1 has no effect when the proposal here is resubmitted. Provision 1 has no effect when the proposal here has a review mark at or below 18. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Which one describes Mirach?", "options": ["is theoretical", "is renewed", "is translational", "has a patent filing", "is interdisciplinary", "is exploratory", "has a field site"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a field site", "unit_id": "u001477", "pair_id": "u001477-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001477-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "69ba05311c5e4adb", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a7", "a4", "a5", "a14", "a11", "a0", "a8"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001477-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nashira is not longitudinal. Nashira is not shortlisted. Nashira is not budgeted. Capella is not budgeted. Nashira has a review mark of 10. Mirach is shortlisted. Mirach is not a pilot study. Mirach is not resubmitted. Mirach is endorsed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has a review mark in excess of 45, it thereby is exploratory. Point B. If said proposal is budgeted, it thereby is renewed. Point C. If said proposal is not endorsed, it thereby has a field site. Point D. If said proposal is endorsed, it thereby is translational. Point E. If said proposal is resubmitted, it thereby is interdisciplinary. Point F. If said proposal is longitudinal, it thereby has a patent filing. Point G. If said proposal has a citation index of minimum 20, it thereby has no field site. Point H. If said proposal is a pilot study, it thereby is multicenter. Point I. If said proposal is shortlisted, it thereby is not interdisciplinary. Point J. If said proposal is not budgeted, it thereby is theoretical. Point A is cancelled if said proposal is resubmitted. Point A is cancelled if said proposal has a review mark of maximum 18. Point G supersedes Point C. Point I supersedes Point E. Question: Which choice is true for Mirach?", "options": ["is theoretical", "is renewed", "is translational", "has a patent filing", "is interdisciplinary", "is exploratory", "has a field site"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is translational", "unit_id": "u001477", "pair_id": "u001477-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001477-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "36f21c9ff01c29c9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a7", "a4", "a5", "a14", "a11", "a0", "a8"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001477-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nashira is not longitudinal. Nashira is not shortlisted. Nashira is not budgeted. Capella is not budgeted. Nashira has a review mark of 10. Mirach is shortlisted. Mirach is not a pilot study. Mirach is not resubmitted. Mirach is not endorsed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has a review mark in excess of 45, it thereby is exploratory. Point B. If said proposal is budgeted, it thereby is renewed. Point C. If said proposal is not endorsed, it thereby has a field site. Point D. If said proposal is endorsed, it thereby is translational. Point E. If said proposal is resubmitted, it thereby is interdisciplinary. Point F. If said proposal is longitudinal, it thereby has a patent filing. Point G. If said proposal has a citation index of minimum 20, it thereby has no field site. Point H. If said proposal is a pilot study, it thereby is multicenter. Point I. If said proposal is shortlisted, it thereby is not interdisciplinary. Point J. If said proposal is not budgeted, it thereby is theoretical. Point A is cancelled if said proposal is resubmitted. Point A is cancelled if said proposal has a review mark of maximum 18. Point G supersedes Point C. Point I supersedes Point E. Question: Which choice is true for Mirach?", "options": ["is theoretical", "is renewed", "is translational", "has a patent filing", "is interdisciplinary", "is exploratory", "has a field site"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a field site", "unit_id": "u001477", "pair_id": "u001477-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001477-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "69ba05311c5e4adb", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a7", "a4", "a5", "a14", "a11", "a0", "a8"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001477-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nashira is not longitudinal. Nashira is not shortlisted. Nashira is not budgeted. Capella is not budgeted. Nashira has a review mark of 10. Mirach is shortlisted. Mirach is not a pilot study. Mirach is not resubmitted. Mirach is endorsed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a review mark that exceeds 45, so it is exploratory. No. 2 While the given proposal is budgeted, so it is renewed. No. 3 While the given proposal is not endorsed, so it has a field site. No. 4 While the given proposal is endorsed, so it is translational. No. 5 While the given proposal is resubmitted, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 6 While the given proposal is longitudinal, so it has a patent filing. No. 7 While the given proposal has a citation index not below 20, so it has no field site. No. 8 While the given proposal is a pilot study, so it is multicenter. No. 9 While the given proposal is shortlisted, so it is not interdisciplinary. No. 10 While the given proposal is not budgeted, so it is theoretical. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal is resubmitted. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a review mark not above 18. No. 7 wins over No. 3. No. 9 wins over No. 5. Question: Select what holds for Mirach: which option?", "options": ["is theoretical", "is renewed", "is translational", "has a patent filing", "is interdisciplinary", "is exploratory", "has a field site"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is translational", "unit_id": "u001477", "pair_id": "u001477-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001477-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "36f21c9ff01c29c9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a7", "a4", "a5", "a14", "a11", "a0", "a8"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001477-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nashira is not longitudinal. Nashira is not shortlisted. Nashira is not budgeted. Capella is not budgeted. Nashira has a review mark of 10. Mirach is shortlisted. Mirach is not a pilot study. Mirach is not resubmitted. Mirach is not endorsed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a review mark that exceeds 45, so it is exploratory. No. 2 While the given proposal is budgeted, so it is renewed. No. 3 While the given proposal is not endorsed, so it has a field site. No. 4 While the given proposal is endorsed, so it is translational. No. 5 While the given proposal is resubmitted, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 6 While the given proposal is longitudinal, so it has a patent filing. No. 7 While the given proposal has a citation index not below 20, so it has no field site. No. 8 While the given proposal is a pilot study, so it is multicenter. No. 9 While the given proposal is shortlisted, so it is not interdisciplinary. No. 10 While the given proposal is not budgeted, so it is theoretical. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal is resubmitted. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a review mark not above 18. No. 7 wins over No. 3. No. 9 wins over No. 5. Question: Select what holds for Mirach: which option?", "options": ["is theoretical", "is renewed", "is translational", "has a patent filing", "is interdisciplinary", "is exploratory", "has a field site"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a field site", "unit_id": "u001477", "pair_id": "u001477-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001477-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "69ba05311c5e4adb", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a7", "a4", "a5", "a14", "a11", "a0", "a8"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001492-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica has no security advisory. Gneiss is linted. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 87. Gneiss has no security advisory. Galena is not linted. Galena has a patch cycle of 46. Galena is profiled. Galena has a lint backlog of 94. Galena has a security advisory. Mica has a patch cycle of 49. Gneiss has a test yield of 69. Gneiss has a patch cycle of 37. Galena is not flaky. Obsidian has a lint backlog of 10. Galena has a test yield of 62. Mica is flaky. Galena is reproducible. Galena has a defect tally of 21. Obsidian is linted. Mica has a lint backlog of 71.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is not experimental provided that it is reproducible as well as has a defect tally lower than 68. Section 2: a build is obsolete provided that it has a test yield of 18 or higher as well as has a patch cycle of 12 or lower. Section 3: a build is backported provided that it is linted as well as has a security advisory. Section 4: a build is benchmarked provided that it is flaky as well as is not profiled as well as has a lint backlog of 61 or higher. Section 5: a build is not merged provided that it is backported as well as has a test yield lower than 67 as well as has a security advisory. Section 6: a build is merged provided that it is backported as well as has a test yield of 67 or higher as well as has a patch cycle of 35 or lower. Question: Galena is merged. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001492", "pair_id": "u001492-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001492-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a90e71fe006bd4c5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001492-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica has no security advisory. Gneiss is linted. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 87. Gneiss has no security advisory. Galena is not linted. Galena has a patch cycle of 46. Galena is profiled. Galena has a lint backlog of 94. Galena has a security advisory. Mica has a patch cycle of 49. Gneiss has a test yield of 69. Gneiss has a patch cycle of 37. Galena is not flaky. Obsidian has a lint backlog of 10. Galena has a test yield of 62. Mica is flaky. Galena is reproducible. Galena has a defect tally of 21. Obsidian is linted. Mica has a lint backlog of 71.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is not experimental provided that it is not reproducible as well as has a defect tally lower than 68. Section 2: a build is obsolete provided that it has a test yield of 18 or higher as well as has a patch cycle of 12 or lower. Section 3: a build is backported provided that it is linted as well as has a security advisory. Section 4: a build is benchmarked provided that it is flaky as well as is not profiled as well as has a lint backlog of 61 or higher. Section 5: a build is not merged provided that it is backported as well as has a test yield lower than 67 as well as has a security advisory. Section 6: a build is merged provided that it is backported as well as has a test yield of 67 or higher as well as has a patch cycle of 35 or lower. Question: Galena is merged. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001492", "pair_id": "u001492-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001492-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "b4fb770619b2ad57", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001492-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica has no security advisory. Gneiss is linted. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 87. Gneiss has no security advisory. Galena is not linted. Galena has a patch cycle of 46. Galena is profiled. Galena has a lint backlog of 94. Galena has a security advisory. Mica has a patch cycle of 49. Gneiss has a test yield of 69. Gneiss has a patch cycle of 37. Galena is not flaky. Obsidian has a lint backlog of 10. Galena has a test yield of 62. Mica is flaky. Galena is reproducible. Galena has a defect tally of 21. Obsidian is linted. Mica has a lint backlog of 71.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is reproducible plus has a defect tally smaller than 68: then it is not experimental. Policy II. Suppose that build has a test yield no lower than 18 plus has a patch cycle no higher than 12: then it is obsolete. Policy III. Suppose that build is linted plus has a security advisory: then it is backported. Policy IV. Suppose that build is flaky plus is not profiled plus has a lint backlog no lower than 61: then it is benchmarked. Policy V. Suppose that build is backported plus has a test yield smaller than 67 plus has a security advisory: then it is not merged. Policy VI. Suppose that build is backported plus has a test yield no lower than 67 plus has a patch cycle no higher than 35: then it is merged. Question: Is it so that Galena is merged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001492", "pair_id": "u001492-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001492-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a90e71fe006bd4c5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001492-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica has no security advisory. Gneiss is linted. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 87. Gneiss has no security advisory. Galena is not linted. Galena has a patch cycle of 46. Galena is profiled. Galena has a lint backlog of 94. Galena has a security advisory. Mica has a patch cycle of 49. Gneiss has a test yield of 69. Gneiss has a patch cycle of 37. Galena is not flaky. Obsidian has a lint backlog of 10. Galena has a test yield of 62. Mica is flaky. Galena is reproducible. Galena has a defect tally of 21. Obsidian is linted. Mica has a lint backlog of 71.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is not reproducible plus has a defect tally smaller than 68: then it is not experimental. Policy II. Suppose that build has a test yield no lower than 18 plus has a patch cycle no higher than 12: then it is obsolete. Policy III. Suppose that build is linted plus has a security advisory: then it is backported. Policy IV. Suppose that build is flaky plus is not profiled plus has a lint backlog no lower than 61: then it is benchmarked. Policy V. Suppose that build is backported plus has a test yield smaller than 67 plus has a security advisory: then it is not merged. Policy VI. Suppose that build is backported plus has a test yield no lower than 67 plus has a patch cycle no higher than 35: then it is merged. Question: Is it so that Galena is merged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001492", "pair_id": "u001492-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001492-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "b4fb770619b2ad57", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u001496-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek is not a smoker. Zdenek is not appraised. Agata is appraised. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Agata has a payout ceiling of 76.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is litigated while is not a smoker, thus it has a deductible waiver. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is not appraised, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is litigated while has a payout ceiling beneath 61, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is litigated while is a smoker, thus it is reinstated. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is not uninsurable, thus it is litigated. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is litigated while has a payout ceiling at or above 61, thus it is disputed. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is litigated while is retired, thus it is bundled. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is litigated while is not retired, thus it is reimbursed. Question: Which one describes Zdenek?", "options": ["has a beneficiary", "is bundled", "is reinstated", "is reimbursed", "is disputed", "has a deductible waiver"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a deductible waiver", "unit_id": "u001496", "pair_id": "u001496-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001496-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "f6003163de138a06", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a0", "a7", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001496-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek is not a smoker. Zdenek is appraised. Agata is appraised. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Agata has a payout ceiling of 76.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is litigated while is not a smoker, thus it has a deductible waiver. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is not appraised, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is litigated while has a payout ceiling beneath 61, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is litigated while is a smoker, thus it is reinstated. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is not uninsurable, thus it is litigated. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is litigated while has a payout ceiling at or above 61, thus it is disputed. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is litigated while is retired, thus it is bundled. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is litigated while is not retired, thus it is reimbursed. Question: Which one describes Zdenek?", "options": ["has a beneficiary", "is bundled", "is reinstated", "is reimbursed", "is disputed", "has a deductible waiver"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a deductible waiver", "unit_id": "u001496", "pair_id": "u001496-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001496-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5ff97c001fab81bd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a0", "a7", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001496-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek is not a smoker. Zdenek is not appraised. Agata is appraised. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Agata has a payout ceiling of 76.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is litigated and further is not a smoker, it thereby has a deductible waiver. Point B. If said policyholder is not appraised, it thereby is grandfathered. Point C. If said policyholder is litigated and further has a payout ceiling short of 61, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point D. If said policyholder is litigated and further is a smoker, it thereby is reinstated. Point E. If said policyholder is not uninsurable, it thereby is litigated. Point F. If said policyholder is litigated and further has a payout ceiling of minimum 61, it thereby is disputed. Point G. If said policyholder is litigated and further is retired, it thereby is bundled. Point H. If said policyholder is litigated and further is not retired, it thereby is reimbursed. Question: Which choice is true for Zdenek?", "options": ["has a beneficiary", "is bundled", "is reinstated", "is reimbursed", "is disputed", "has a deductible waiver"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a deductible waiver", "unit_id": "u001496", "pair_id": "u001496-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001496-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "f6003163de138a06", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a0", "a7", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001496-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek is not a smoker. Zdenek is appraised. Agata is appraised. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Agata has a payout ceiling of 76.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is litigated and further is not a smoker, it thereby has a deductible waiver. Point B. If said policyholder is not appraised, it thereby is grandfathered. Point C. If said policyholder is litigated and further has a payout ceiling short of 61, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point D. If said policyholder is litigated and further is a smoker, it thereby is reinstated. Point E. If said policyholder is not uninsurable, it thereby is litigated. Point F. If said policyholder is litigated and further has a payout ceiling of minimum 61, it thereby is disputed. Point G. If said policyholder is litigated and further is retired, it thereby is bundled. Point H. If said policyholder is litigated and further is not retired, it thereby is reimbursed. Question: Which choice is true for Zdenek?", "options": ["has a beneficiary", "is bundled", "is reinstated", "is reimbursed", "is disputed", "has a deductible waiver"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a deductible waiver", "unit_id": "u001496", "pair_id": "u001496-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001496-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5ff97c001fab81bd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a0", "a7", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001496-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek is not a smoker. Zdenek is not appraised. Agata is appraised. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Agata has a payout ceiling of 76.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is litigated and likewise is not a smoker, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 2 While the given policyholder is not appraised, so it is grandfathered. No. 3 While the given policyholder is litigated and likewise has a payout ceiling that falls below 61, so it has a beneficiary. No. 4 While the given policyholder is litigated and likewise is a smoker, so it is reinstated. No. 5 While the given policyholder is not uninsurable, so it is litigated. No. 6 While the given policyholder is litigated and likewise has a payout ceiling not below 61, so it is disputed. No. 7 While the given policyholder is litigated and likewise is retired, so it is bundled. No. 8 While the given policyholder is litigated and likewise is not retired, so it is reimbursed. Question: Select what holds for Zdenek: which option?", "options": ["has a beneficiary", "is bundled", "is reinstated", "is reimbursed", "is disputed", "has a deductible waiver"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a deductible waiver", "unit_id": "u001496", "pair_id": "u001496-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001496-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "f6003163de138a06", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a0", "a7", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001496-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek is not a smoker. Zdenek is appraised. Agata is appraised. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Agata has a payout ceiling of 76.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is litigated and likewise is not a smoker, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 2 While the given policyholder is not appraised, so it is grandfathered. No. 3 While the given policyholder is litigated and likewise has a payout ceiling that falls below 61, so it has a beneficiary. No. 4 While the given policyholder is litigated and likewise is a smoker, so it is reinstated. No. 5 While the given policyholder is not uninsurable, so it is litigated. No. 6 While the given policyholder is litigated and likewise has a payout ceiling not below 61, so it is disputed. No. 7 While the given policyholder is litigated and likewise is retired, so it is bundled. No. 8 While the given policyholder is litigated and likewise is not retired, so it is reimbursed. Question: Select what holds for Zdenek: which option?", "options": ["has a beneficiary", "is bundled", "is reinstated", "is reimbursed", "is disputed", "has a deductible waiver"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a deductible waiver", "unit_id": "u001496", "pair_id": "u001496-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001496-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5ff97c001fab81bd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a0", "a7", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001502-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is interviewed. Kalle is not interviewed. Olek is not sponsored. Kalle is unionized. Noor is a veteran. Olek is relocating. Kalle is not relocating. Olek is a veteran. Noor is unionized. Olek is not unionized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is sponsored, thus it has a visa. Provision 2: when the candidate here is relocating, thus it is not a graduate. Provision 3: when the candidate here is interviewed, thus it is licensed. Provision 4: when the candidate here is unionized, thus it is a graduate. Provision 4 has no effect when the candidate here is sponsored. Provision 3 has no effect when the candidate here is a veteran. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Olek is seasoned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001502", "pair_id": "u001502-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001502-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0c6b74f71e23830c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001502-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is interviewed. Kalle is not interviewed. Olek is not sponsored. Kalle is unionized. Noor is a veteran. Olek is relocating. Kalle is not relocating. Olek is a veteran. Olek is not seasoned. Noor is unionized. Olek is not unionized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is sponsored, thus it has a visa. Provision 2: when the candidate here is relocating, thus it is not a graduate. Provision 3: when the candidate here is interviewed, thus it is licensed. Provision 4: when the candidate here is unionized, thus it is a graduate. Provision 4 has no effect when the candidate here is sponsored. Provision 3 has no effect when the candidate here is a veteran. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Olek is seasoned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001502", "pair_id": "u001502-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001502-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b2eb8b24ca24a98a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001502-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is interviewed. Kalle is not interviewed. Olek is not sponsored. Kalle is unionized. Noor is a veteran. Olek is relocating. Kalle is not relocating. Olek is a veteran. Noor is unionized. Olek is not unionized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is sponsored, it thereby has a visa. Point B. If said candidate is relocating, it thereby is not a graduate. Point C. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby is licensed. Point D. If said candidate is unionized, it thereby is a graduate. Point D is cancelled if said candidate is sponsored. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is a veteran. Point D supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Olek is seasoned. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001502", "pair_id": "u001502-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001502-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0c6b74f71e23830c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001502-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is interviewed. Kalle is not interviewed. Olek is not sponsored. Kalle is unionized. Noor is a veteran. Olek is relocating. Kalle is not relocating. Olek is a veteran. Olek is not seasoned. Noor is unionized. Olek is not unionized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is sponsored, it thereby has a visa. Point B. If said candidate is relocating, it thereby is not a graduate. Point C. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby is licensed. Point D. If said candidate is unionized, it thereby is a graduate. Point D is cancelled if said candidate is sponsored. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is a veteran. Point D supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Olek is seasoned. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001502", "pair_id": "u001502-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001502-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b2eb8b24ca24a98a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001569-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf has no caregiver. Yusuf has a fever reading of 75. Yusuf has no pacemaker. Yusuf is referred. Yusuf has a pulse rate of 18. Yusuf is not pregnant. Yusuf has a chaperone. Yusuf is not bedridden. Yusuf is vaccinated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has a pulse rate no lower than 75 plus has a caregiver: then it is asthmatic. Policy II. Suppose that patient is vaccinated plus has a fever reading smaller than 81 plus has a pulse rate higher than 33: then it is hypertensive. Policy III. Suppose that patient is vaccinated plus has a pain level no lower than 56: then it is symptomatic. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is vaccinated plus has a fever reading no lower than 81: then it is rescheduled. Policy V. Suppose that patient is not pregnant plus is not referred plus has a pulse rate no higher than 79: then it is ambulatory. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is vaccinated plus has no pacemaker plus is not bedridden: then it is sedated. Policy VII. Suppose that patient is vaccinated plus has a pacemaker: then it is diabetic. Policy VIII. Suppose that patient is vaccinated plus has a pain level smaller than 56: then it is contagious. Policy VIII is waived if that patient has a chaperone. Question: Which choice is right for Yusuf?", "options": ["is diabetic", "is rescheduled", "is symptomatic", "is contagious", "is hypertensive", "is sedated"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sedated", "unit_id": "u001569", "pair_id": "u001569-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001569-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0d8b9f88c30baa1e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a17", "a7", "a1", "a13", "a15"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u001569-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf has no caregiver. Yusuf has a fever reading of 75. Yusuf has no pacemaker. Yusuf is not referred. Yusuf has a pulse rate of 18. Yusuf is not pregnant. Yusuf has a chaperone. Yusuf is not bedridden. Yusuf is vaccinated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has a pulse rate no lower than 75 plus has a caregiver: then it is asthmatic. Policy II. Suppose that patient is vaccinated plus has a fever reading smaller than 81 plus has a pulse rate higher than 33: then it is hypertensive. Policy III. Suppose that patient is vaccinated plus has a pain level no lower than 56: then it is symptomatic. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is vaccinated plus has a fever reading no lower than 81: then it is rescheduled. Policy V. Suppose that patient is not pregnant plus is not referred plus has a pulse rate no higher than 79: then it is ambulatory. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is vaccinated plus has no pacemaker plus is not bedridden: then it is sedated. Policy VII. Suppose that patient is vaccinated plus has a pacemaker: then it is diabetic. Policy VIII. Suppose that patient is vaccinated plus has a pain level smaller than 56: then it is contagious. Policy VIII is waived if that patient has a chaperone. Question: Which choice is right for Yusuf?", "options": ["is diabetic", "is rescheduled", "is symptomatic", "is contagious", "is hypertensive", "is sedated"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sedated", "unit_id": "u001569", "pair_id": "u001569-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001569-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "da4c0b07ec38349c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a17", "a7", "a1", "a13", "a15"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u001569-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf has no caregiver. Yusuf has a fever reading of 75. Yusuf has no pacemaker. Yusuf is referred. Yusuf has a pulse rate of 18. Yusuf is not pregnant. Yusuf has a chaperone. Yusuf is not bedridden. Yusuf is vaccinated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has a pulse rate of 75 or above and additionally has a caregiver, it then is asthmatic. #2 Each time a patient is vaccinated and additionally has a fever reading less than 81 and additionally has a pulse rate greater than 33, it then is hypertensive. #3 Each time a patient is vaccinated and additionally has a pain level of 56 or above, it then is symptomatic. #4 Each time a patient is vaccinated and additionally has a fever reading of 81 or above, it then is rescheduled. #5 Each time a patient is not pregnant and additionally is not referred and additionally has a pulse rate of 79 or below, it then is ambulatory. #6 Each time a patient is vaccinated and additionally has no pacemaker and additionally is not bedridden, it then is sedated. #7 Each time a patient is vaccinated and additionally has a pacemaker, it then is diabetic. #8 Each time a patient is vaccinated and additionally has a pain level less than 56, it then is contagious. #8 is set aside if a patient has a chaperone. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Yusuf?", "options": ["is diabetic", "is rescheduled", "is symptomatic", "is contagious", "is hypertensive", "is sedated"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sedated", "unit_id": "u001569", "pair_id": "u001569-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001569-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0d8b9f88c30baa1e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a17", "a7", "a1", "a13", "a15"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u001569-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf has no caregiver. Yusuf has a fever reading of 75. Yusuf has no pacemaker. Yusuf is not referred. Yusuf has a pulse rate of 18. Yusuf is not pregnant. Yusuf has a chaperone. Yusuf is not bedridden. Yusuf is vaccinated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has a pulse rate of 75 or above and additionally has a caregiver, it then is asthmatic. #2 Each time a patient is vaccinated and additionally has a fever reading less than 81 and additionally has a pulse rate greater than 33, it then is hypertensive. #3 Each time a patient is vaccinated and additionally has a pain level of 56 or above, it then is symptomatic. #4 Each time a patient is vaccinated and additionally has a fever reading of 81 or above, it then is rescheduled. #5 Each time a patient is not pregnant and additionally is not referred and additionally has a pulse rate of 79 or below, it then is ambulatory. #6 Each time a patient is vaccinated and additionally has no pacemaker and additionally is not bedridden, it then is sedated. #7 Each time a patient is vaccinated and additionally has a pacemaker, it then is diabetic. #8 Each time a patient is vaccinated and additionally has a pain level less than 56, it then is contagious. #8 is set aside if a patient has a chaperone. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Yusuf?", "options": ["is diabetic", "is rescheduled", "is symptomatic", "is contagious", "is hypertensive", "is sedated"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sedated", "unit_id": "u001569", "pair_id": "u001569-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001569-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "da4c0b07ec38349c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a17", "a7", "a1", "a13", "a15"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u001600-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is not uninsurable. Dmitri is uninsurable. Fabian has no dashcam. Fabian is covered. Fabian is not disputed. Fabian has a rider. Fabian is inspected. Bruno has a dashcam.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is covered and is disputed, then it is bundled. (2) If a policyholder has a dashcam and is indemnified, then it has flood coverage. (3) If a policyholder is not covered, then it is not lapsed. (4) If a policyholder is uninsurable, then it has no flood coverage. (5) If a policyholder is covered and has a rider and is inspected, then it is not bundled. (6) If a policyholder is disputed and is uninsurable, then it is reinstated. (7) If a policyholder has a dashcam, then it is lapsed. When (7) and (3) clash, (7) prevails. When (4) and (2) clash, (4) prevails. When (1) and (5) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Fabian is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001600", "pair_id": "u001600-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001600-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "446fed8ce93d91bd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001600-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is not uninsurable. Dmitri is uninsurable. Fabian has no dashcam. Fabian is covered. Fabian is not disputed. Fabian has a rider. Fabian is inspected. Bruno has a dashcam.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is covered and is disputed, then it is bundled. (2) If a policyholder has a dashcam and is indemnified, then it has flood coverage. (3) If a policyholder is covered, then it is not lapsed. (4) If a policyholder is uninsurable, then it has no flood coverage. (5) If a policyholder is covered and has a rider and is inspected, then it is not bundled. (6) If a policyholder is disputed and is uninsurable, then it is reinstated. (7) If a policyholder has a dashcam, then it is lapsed. When (7) and (3) clash, (7) prevails. When (4) and (2) clash, (4) prevails. When (1) and (5) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Fabian is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001600", "pair_id": "u001600-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001600-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4af7ed1378ec0316", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001600-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is not uninsurable. Dmitri is uninsurable. Fabian has no dashcam. Fabian is covered. Fabian is not disputed. Fabian has a rider. Fabian is inspected. Bruno has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is covered, and is disputed, that policyholder is bundled. Item B. When the policyholder has a dashcam, and is indemnified, that policyholder has flood coverage. Item C. When the policyholder is not covered, that policyholder is not lapsed. Item D. When the policyholder is uninsurable, that policyholder has no flood coverage. Item E. When the policyholder is covered, and has a rider, and is inspected, that policyholder is not bundled. Item F. When the policyholder is disputed, and is uninsurable, that policyholder is reinstated. Item G. When the policyholder has a dashcam, that policyholder is lapsed. Item G outranks Item C. Item D outranks Item B. Item A outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Fabian is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001600", "pair_id": "u001600-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001600-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "446fed8ce93d91bd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001600-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is not uninsurable. Dmitri is uninsurable. Fabian has no dashcam. Fabian is covered. Fabian is not disputed. Fabian has a rider. Fabian is inspected. Bruno has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is covered, and is disputed, that policyholder is bundled. Item B. When the policyholder has a dashcam, and is indemnified, that policyholder has flood coverage. Item C. When the policyholder is covered, that policyholder is not lapsed. Item D. When the policyholder is uninsurable, that policyholder has no flood coverage. Item E. When the policyholder is covered, and has a rider, and is inspected, that policyholder is not bundled. Item F. When the policyholder is disputed, and is uninsurable, that policyholder is reinstated. Item G. When the policyholder has a dashcam, that policyholder is lapsed. Item G outranks Item C. Item D outranks Item B. Item A outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Fabian is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001600", "pair_id": "u001600-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001600-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4af7ed1378ec0316", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001620-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bastien has no cosigner. Ingrid has a cosigner. Ingrid is refinanced. Ingrid has a mortgage. Ingrid is employed. Ingrid is indebted. Ingrid is a depositor. Ingrid is not amortized. Bastien is not delinquent. Bastien has a mortgage. Ingrid is pensioned. Ingrid is a homeowner. Bastien is not a homeowner. Bastien is not a depositor. Bastien is not amortized. Ingrid is delinquent.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has a lien provided that it is creditworthy as well as is a homeowner as well as has a cosigner. Section 2: a borrower is creditworthy provided that it is bankrupt as well as is refinanced. Section 3: a borrower is audited provided that it is creditworthy as well as has a cosigner as well as is a depositor. Section 4: a borrower is bankrupt provided that it has a mortgage as well as is indebted as well as is pensioned. Section 5: a borrower is foreclosed provided that it is creditworthy as well as is a depositor as well as is employed. Section 6: a borrower is not garnished provided that it is amortized. Section 7: a borrower is not foreclosed provided that it is delinquent. Section 1 lapses for a borrower if it is a depositor. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Which statement fits Ingrid?", "options": ["is foreclosed", "has a lien", "is audited"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is audited", "unit_id": "u001620", "pair_id": "u001620-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001620-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec68be49131f8ce2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a12", "a15"]}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u001620-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bastien has no cosigner. Ingrid has a cosigner. Ingrid is refinanced. Ingrid has a mortgage. Ingrid is employed. Ingrid is indebted. Ingrid is not a depositor. Ingrid is not amortized. Bastien is not delinquent. Bastien has a mortgage. Ingrid is pensioned. Ingrid is a homeowner. Bastien is not a homeowner. Bastien is not a depositor. Bastien is not amortized. Ingrid is delinquent.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has a lien provided that it is creditworthy as well as is a homeowner as well as has a cosigner. Section 2: a borrower is creditworthy provided that it is bankrupt as well as is refinanced. Section 3: a borrower is audited provided that it is creditworthy as well as has a cosigner as well as is a depositor. Section 4: a borrower is bankrupt provided that it has a mortgage as well as is indebted as well as is pensioned. Section 5: a borrower is foreclosed provided that it is creditworthy as well as is a depositor as well as is employed. Section 6: a borrower is not garnished provided that it is amortized. Section 7: a borrower is not foreclosed provided that it is delinquent. Section 1 lapses for a borrower if it is a depositor. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Which statement fits Ingrid?", "options": ["is foreclosed", "has a lien", "is audited"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a lien", "unit_id": "u001620", "pair_id": "u001620-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001620-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ef73e427bec657e0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a12", "a15"]}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u001620-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bastien has no cosigner. Ingrid has a cosigner. Ingrid is refinanced. Ingrid has a mortgage. Ingrid is employed. Ingrid is indebted. Ingrid is a depositor. Ingrid is not amortized. Bastien is not delinquent. Bastien has a mortgage. Ingrid is pensioned. Ingrid is a homeowner. Bastien is not a homeowner. Bastien is not a depositor. Bastien is not amortized. Ingrid is delinquent.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy plus is a homeowner plus has a cosigner: then it has a lien. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt plus is refinanced: then it is creditworthy. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy plus has a cosigner plus is a depositor: then it is audited. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a mortgage plus is indebted plus is pensioned: then it is bankrupt. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy plus is a depositor plus is employed: then it is foreclosed. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is amortized: then it is not garnished. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is delinquent: then it is not foreclosed. Policy I is waived if that borrower is a depositor. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy V. Question: Which choice is right for Ingrid?", "options": ["is foreclosed", "has a lien", "is audited"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is audited", "unit_id": "u001620", "pair_id": "u001620-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001620-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec68be49131f8ce2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a12", "a15"]}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u001620-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bastien has no cosigner. Ingrid has a cosigner. Ingrid is refinanced. Ingrid has a mortgage. Ingrid is employed. Ingrid is indebted. Ingrid is not a depositor. Ingrid is not amortized. Bastien is not delinquent. Bastien has a mortgage. Ingrid is pensioned. Ingrid is a homeowner. Bastien is not a homeowner. Bastien is not a depositor. Bastien is not amortized. Ingrid is delinquent.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy plus is a homeowner plus has a cosigner: then it has a lien. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt plus is refinanced: then it is creditworthy. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy plus has a cosigner plus is a depositor: then it is audited. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a mortgage plus is indebted plus is pensioned: then it is bankrupt. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy plus is a depositor plus is employed: then it is foreclosed. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is amortized: then it is not garnished. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is delinquent: then it is not foreclosed. Policy I is waived if that borrower is a depositor. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy V. Question: Which choice is right for Ingrid?", "options": ["is foreclosed", "has a lien", "is audited"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a lien", "unit_id": "u001620", "pair_id": "u001620-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001620-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ef73e427bec657e0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a12", "a15"]}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u001656-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is delinquent. Bastien is delinquent. Wiebke is delinquent. Wiebke has a mortgage. Hamid is a depositor. Wiebke is not solvent. Evren is not a depositor. Evren is solvent. Bastien is solvent.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no escrow account provided that it is foreclosed. Section 2: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it is foreclosed. Section 3: a borrower is audited provided that it is solvent. Section 4: a borrower is underwritten provided that it is not delinquent. Section 5: a borrower is foreclosed provided that it is underwritten. Section 1 lapses for a borrower if it is not a depositor. Section 2 lapses for a borrower if it is a depositor. Section 5 lapses for a borrower if it has no mortgage. Question: Evren has an escrow account. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001656", "pair_id": "u001656-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001656-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5a4f8d5aebad9c39", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u001656-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is delinquent. Bastien is delinquent. Wiebke is delinquent. Wiebke has a mortgage. Hamid is a depositor. Wiebke is not solvent. Evren is not a depositor. Evren is not solvent. Bastien is solvent.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no escrow account provided that it is foreclosed. Section 2: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it is foreclosed. Section 3: a borrower is audited provided that it is solvent. Section 4: a borrower is underwritten provided that it is not delinquent. Section 5: a borrower is foreclosed provided that it is underwritten. Section 1 lapses for a borrower if it is not a depositor. Section 2 lapses for a borrower if it is a depositor. Section 5 lapses for a borrower if it has no mortgage. Question: Evren has an escrow account. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001656", "pair_id": "u001656-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001656-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2fc93b7f95ba4adb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u001656-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is delinquent. Bastien is delinquent. Wiebke is delinquent. Wiebke has a mortgage. Hamid is a depositor. Wiebke is not solvent. Evren is not a depositor. Evren is solvent. Bastien is solvent.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is foreclosed: then it has no escrow account. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is foreclosed: then it has an escrow account. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is solvent: then it is audited. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is not delinquent: then it is underwritten. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is underwritten: then it is foreclosed. Policy I is waived if that borrower is not a depositor. Policy II is waived if that borrower is a depositor. Policy V is waived if that borrower has no mortgage. Question: Is it so that Evren has an escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001656", "pair_id": "u001656-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001656-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5a4f8d5aebad9c39", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u001656-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is delinquent. Bastien is delinquent. Wiebke is delinquent. Wiebke has a mortgage. Hamid is a depositor. Wiebke is not solvent. Evren is not a depositor. Evren is not solvent. Bastien is solvent.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is foreclosed: then it has no escrow account. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is foreclosed: then it has an escrow account. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is solvent: then it is audited. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is not delinquent: then it is underwritten. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is underwritten: then it is foreclosed. Policy I is waived if that borrower is not a depositor. Policy II is waived if that borrower is a depositor. Policy V is waived if that borrower has no mortgage. Question: Is it so that Evren has an escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001656", "pair_id": "u001656-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001656-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2fc93b7f95ba4adb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u001656-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is delinquent. Bastien is delinquent. Wiebke is delinquent. Wiebke has a mortgage. Hamid is a depositor. Wiebke is not solvent. Evren is not a depositor. Evren is solvent. Bastien is solvent.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then has no escrow account. #2 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then has an escrow account. #3 Each time a borrower is solvent, it then is audited. #4 Each time a borrower is not delinquent, it then is underwritten. #5 Each time a borrower is underwritten, it then is foreclosed. #1 is set aside if a borrower is not a depositor. #2 is set aside if a borrower is a depositor. #5 is set aside if a borrower has no mortgage. Question: Do the terms above show that Evren has an escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001656", "pair_id": "u001656-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001656-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5a4f8d5aebad9c39", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u001656-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is delinquent. Bastien is delinquent. Wiebke is delinquent. Wiebke has a mortgage. Hamid is a depositor. Wiebke is not solvent. Evren is not a depositor. Evren is not solvent. Bastien is solvent.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then has no escrow account. #2 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then has an escrow account. #3 Each time a borrower is solvent, it then is audited. #4 Each time a borrower is not delinquent, it then is underwritten. #5 Each time a borrower is underwritten, it then is foreclosed. #1 is set aside if a borrower is not a depositor. #2 is set aside if a borrower is a depositor. #5 is set aside if a borrower has no mortgage. Question: Do the terms above show that Evren has an escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001656", "pair_id": "u001656-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001656-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2fc93b7f95ba4adb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u001658-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist has a changelog. Gneiss is not fuzzed. Gneiss is not reproducible. Mica is not reproducible. Gneiss is not experimental. Gneiss is not localized. Mica is not notarized. Schist is not localized. Mica is experimental. Gneiss has no security advisory. Schist is notarized. Gneiss is not notarized. Schist is experimental. Mica is not tested. Mica has no security advisory. Gneiss is not linted. Gneiss has no changelog. Mica is not signed. Mica is not benchmarked. Mica is not linted. Mica has a feature toggle. Mica has a changelog. Mica is fuzzed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is documented provided that it is profiled as well as is notarized. Section 2: a build is flaky provided that it is profiled as well as is benchmarked as well as is localized. Section 3: a build is tagged provided that it is profiled as well as is reproducible. Section 4: a build has a migration script provided that it is profiled as well as is fuzzed. Section 5: a build is not merged provided that it is obsolete as well as is signed. Section 6: a build is obsolete provided that it is experimental as well as is benchmarked. Section 7: a build is profiled provided that it is versioned. Section 8: a build is compiled provided that it is profiled as well as is tested as well as is obsolete. Section 9: a build is backported provided that it is profiled as well as has a security advisory as well as has a feature toggle. Section 10: a build is versioned provided that it has a changelog. Section 8 lapses for a build if it is linted. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is notarized. Section 8 lapses for a build if it is reproducible. Section 2 lapses for a build if it has a security advisory. Question: Which statement fits Mica?", "options": ["is backported", "is tagged", "is flaky", "is documented", "is compiled", "has a migration script"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a migration script", "unit_id": "u001658", "pair_id": "u001658-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001658-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fc377bc52e0a9e00", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a0", "a6", "a12", "a19", "a15"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u001658-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist has a changelog. Gneiss is not fuzzed. Gneiss is not reproducible. Mica is not reproducible. Gneiss is not experimental. Gneiss is not localized. Mica is notarized. Schist is not localized. Mica is experimental. Gneiss has no security advisory. Schist is notarized. Gneiss is not notarized. Schist is experimental. Mica is not tested. Mica has no security advisory. Gneiss is not linted. Gneiss has no changelog. Mica is not signed. Mica is not benchmarked. Mica is not linted. Mica has a feature toggle. Mica has a changelog. Mica is fuzzed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is documented provided that it is profiled as well as is notarized. Section 2: a build is flaky provided that it is profiled as well as is benchmarked as well as is localized. Section 3: a build is tagged provided that it is profiled as well as is reproducible. Section 4: a build has a migration script provided that it is profiled as well as is fuzzed. Section 5: a build is not merged provided that it is obsolete as well as is signed. Section 6: a build is obsolete provided that it is experimental as well as is benchmarked. Section 7: a build is profiled provided that it is versioned. Section 8: a build is compiled provided that it is profiled as well as is tested as well as is obsolete. Section 9: a build is backported provided that it is profiled as well as has a security advisory as well as has a feature toggle. Section 10: a build is versioned provided that it has a changelog. Section 8 lapses for a build if it is linted. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is notarized. Section 8 lapses for a build if it is reproducible. Section 2 lapses for a build if it has a security advisory. Question: Which statement fits Mica?", "options": ["is backported", "is tagged", "is flaky", "is documented", "is compiled", "has a migration script"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is documented", "unit_id": "u001658", "pair_id": "u001658-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001658-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8900ae77944b8551", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a0", "a6", "a12", "a19", "a15"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u001658-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist has a changelog. Gneiss is not fuzzed. Gneiss is not reproducible. Mica is not reproducible. Gneiss is not experimental. Gneiss is not localized. Mica is not notarized. Schist is not localized. Mica is experimental. Gneiss has no security advisory. Schist is notarized. Gneiss is not notarized. Schist is experimental. Mica is not tested. Mica has no security advisory. Gneiss is not linted. Gneiss has no changelog. Mica is not signed. Mica is not benchmarked. Mica is not linted. Mica has a feature toggle. Mica has a changelog. Mica is fuzzed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is profiled plus is notarized: then it is documented. Policy II. Suppose that build is profiled plus is benchmarked plus is localized: then it is flaky. Policy III. Suppose that build is profiled plus is reproducible: then it is tagged. Policy IV. Suppose that build is profiled plus is fuzzed: then it has a migration script. Policy V. Suppose that build is obsolete plus is signed: then it is not merged. Policy VI. Suppose that build is experimental plus is benchmarked: then it is obsolete. Policy VII. Suppose that build is versioned: then it is profiled. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is profiled plus is tested plus is obsolete: then it is compiled. Policy IX. Suppose that build is profiled plus has a security advisory plus has a feature toggle: then it is backported. Policy X. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is versioned. Policy VIII is waived if that build is linted. Policy IV is waived if that build is notarized. Policy VIII is waived if that build is reproducible. Policy II is waived if that build has a security advisory. Question: Which choice is right for Mica?", "options": ["is backported", "is tagged", "is flaky", "is documented", "is compiled", "has a migration script"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a migration script", "unit_id": "u001658", "pair_id": "u001658-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001658-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fc377bc52e0a9e00", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a0", "a6", "a12", "a19", "a15"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u001658-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist has a changelog. Gneiss is not fuzzed. Gneiss is not reproducible. Mica is not reproducible. Gneiss is not experimental. Gneiss is not localized. Mica is notarized. Schist is not localized. Mica is experimental. Gneiss has no security advisory. Schist is notarized. Gneiss is not notarized. Schist is experimental. Mica is not tested. Mica has no security advisory. Gneiss is not linted. Gneiss has no changelog. Mica is not signed. Mica is not benchmarked. Mica is not linted. Mica has a feature toggle. Mica has a changelog. Mica is fuzzed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is profiled plus is notarized: then it is documented. Policy II. Suppose that build is profiled plus is benchmarked plus is localized: then it is flaky. Policy III. Suppose that build is profiled plus is reproducible: then it is tagged. Policy IV. Suppose that build is profiled plus is fuzzed: then it has a migration script. Policy V. Suppose that build is obsolete plus is signed: then it is not merged. Policy VI. Suppose that build is experimental plus is benchmarked: then it is obsolete. Policy VII. Suppose that build is versioned: then it is profiled. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is profiled plus is tested plus is obsolete: then it is compiled. Policy IX. Suppose that build is profiled plus has a security advisory plus has a feature toggle: then it is backported. Policy X. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is versioned. Policy VIII is waived if that build is linted. Policy IV is waived if that build is notarized. Policy VIII is waived if that build is reproducible. Policy II is waived if that build has a security advisory. Question: Which choice is right for Mica?", "options": ["is backported", "is tagged", "is flaky", "is documented", "is compiled", "has a migration script"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is documented", "unit_id": "u001658", "pair_id": "u001658-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001658-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8900ae77944b8551", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a0", "a6", "a12", "a19", "a15"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u001658-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist has a changelog. Gneiss is not fuzzed. Gneiss is not reproducible. Mica is not reproducible. Gneiss is not experimental. Gneiss is not localized. Mica is not notarized. Schist is not localized. Mica is experimental. Gneiss has no security advisory. Schist is notarized. Gneiss is not notarized. Schist is experimental. Mica is not tested. Mica has no security advisory. Gneiss is not linted. Gneiss has no changelog. Mica is not signed. Mica is not benchmarked. Mica is not linted. Mica has a feature toggle. Mica has a changelog. Mica is fuzzed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is notarized, it then is documented. #2 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is benchmarked and additionally is localized, it then is flaky. #3 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is reproducible, it then is tagged. #4 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is fuzzed, it then has a migration script. #5 Each time a build is obsolete and additionally is signed, it then is not merged. #6 Each time a build is experimental and additionally is benchmarked, it then is obsolete. #7 Each time a build is versioned, it then is profiled. #8 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is tested and additionally is obsolete, it then is compiled. #9 Each time a build is profiled and additionally has a security advisory and additionally has a feature toggle, it then is backported. #10 Each time a build has a changelog, it then is versioned. #8 is set aside if a build is linted. #4 is set aside if a build is notarized. #8 is set aside if a build is reproducible. #2 is set aside if a build has a security advisory. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Mica?", "options": ["is backported", "is tagged", "is flaky", "is documented", "is compiled", "has a migration script"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a migration script", "unit_id": "u001658", "pair_id": "u001658-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001658-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fc377bc52e0a9e00", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a0", "a6", "a12", "a19", "a15"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u001658-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist has a changelog. Gneiss is not fuzzed. Gneiss is not reproducible. Mica is not reproducible. Gneiss is not experimental. Gneiss is not localized. Mica is notarized. Schist is not localized. Mica is experimental. Gneiss has no security advisory. Schist is notarized. Gneiss is not notarized. Schist is experimental. Mica is not tested. Mica has no security advisory. Gneiss is not linted. Gneiss has no changelog. Mica is not signed. Mica is not benchmarked. Mica is not linted. Mica has a feature toggle. Mica has a changelog. Mica is fuzzed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is notarized, it then is documented. #2 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is benchmarked and additionally is localized, it then is flaky. #3 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is reproducible, it then is tagged. #4 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is fuzzed, it then has a migration script. #5 Each time a build is obsolete and additionally is signed, it then is not merged. #6 Each time a build is experimental and additionally is benchmarked, it then is obsolete. #7 Each time a build is versioned, it then is profiled. #8 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is tested and additionally is obsolete, it then is compiled. #9 Each time a build is profiled and additionally has a security advisory and additionally has a feature toggle, it then is backported. #10 Each time a build has a changelog, it then is versioned. #8 is set aside if a build is linted. #4 is set aside if a build is notarized. #8 is set aside if a build is reproducible. #2 is set aside if a build has a security advisory. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Mica?", "options": ["is backported", "is tagged", "is flaky", "is documented", "is compiled", "has a migration script"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is documented", "unit_id": "u001658", "pair_id": "u001658-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001658-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8900ae77944b8551", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a0", "a6", "a12", "a19", "a15"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u001704-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is benchmarked. Basalt is linted. Basalt has a changelog.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is not benchmarked, that build is not compiled. Item B. When the build has a migration script, and has a changelog, and is linted, that build is localized. Item C. When the build has a migration script, and is linted, that build is compiled. Item D. When the build is signed, and is not benchmarked, that build is not merged. Item E. When the build is linted, that build is signed. Item F. When the build is signed, and is benchmarked, that build is merged. Item D outranks Item F. Item C outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Basalt is merged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001704", "pair_id": "u001704-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001704-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "77145a9f44312ae6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001704-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is benchmarked. Basalt is linted. Basalt has a changelog.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is benchmarked, that build is not compiled. Item B. When the build has a migration script, and has a changelog, and is linted, that build is localized. Item C. When the build has a migration script, and is linted, that build is compiled. Item D. When the build is signed, and is not benchmarked, that build is not merged. Item E. When the build is linted, that build is signed. Item F. When the build is signed, and is benchmarked, that build is merged. Item D outranks Item F. Item C outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Basalt is merged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001704", "pair_id": "u001704-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001704-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "15595c17e73ccacb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001735-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is not reverted. Gneiss is not obsolete. Mica is not backported. Mica is obsolete. Gneiss has no feature toggle. Talc is not backported. Talc is not reverted. Gneiss is not linted. Mica has a migration script. Mica is not experimental. Mica has no security advisory.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is merged while is backported, thus it is not profiled. Provision 2: when the build here is not merged while is obsolete while has a migration script, thus it is profiled. Provision 3: when the build here has a changelog while is reverted, thus it is not compiled. Provision 4: when the build here has a migration script while is obsolete, thus it is not merged. Provision 5: when the build here is obsolete, thus it is merged. Provision 6: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is compiled. Provision 7: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it is not benchmarked. Provision 8: when the build here is obsolete while is linted, thus it is benchmarked. Provision 4 has no effect when the build here is experimental while has a security advisory. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Mica is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001735", "pair_id": "u001735-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001735-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0e6ac17c036d646d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001735-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is not reverted. Gneiss is not obsolete. Mica is not backported. Mica is obsolete. Gneiss has no feature toggle. Talc is not backported. Talc is not reverted. Gneiss is not linted. Mica has a migration script. Mica is not experimental. Mica has no security advisory.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is merged while is backported, thus it is not profiled. Provision 2: when the build here is merged while is obsolete while has a migration script, thus it is profiled. Provision 3: when the build here has a changelog while is reverted, thus it is not compiled. Provision 4: when the build here has a migration script while is obsolete, thus it is not merged. Provision 5: when the build here is obsolete, thus it is merged. Provision 6: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is compiled. Provision 7: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it is not benchmarked. Provision 8: when the build here is obsolete while is linted, thus it is benchmarked. Provision 4 has no effect when the build here is experimental while has a security advisory. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Mica is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001735", "pair_id": "u001735-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001735-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d6e7705fa5a868d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001735-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is not reverted. Gneiss is not obsolete. Mica is not backported. Mica is obsolete. Gneiss has no feature toggle. Talc is not backported. Talc is not reverted. Gneiss is not linted. Mica has a migration script. Mica is not experimental. Mica has no security advisory.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is merged and likewise is backported, so it is not profiled. No. 2 While the given build is not merged and likewise is obsolete and likewise has a migration script, so it is profiled. No. 3 While the given build has a changelog and likewise is reverted, so it is not compiled. No. 4 While the given build has a migration script and likewise is obsolete, so it is not merged. No. 5 While the given build is obsolete, so it is merged. No. 6 While the given build has a migration script, so it is compiled. No. 7 While the given build has a feature toggle, so it is not benchmarked. No. 8 While the given build is obsolete and likewise is linted, so it is benchmarked. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given build is experimental and likewise has a security advisory. No. 6 wins over No. 3. No. 4 wins over No. 5. No. 8 wins over No. 7. No. 1 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Mica is profiled\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001735", "pair_id": "u001735-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001735-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0e6ac17c036d646d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001735-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is not reverted. Gneiss is not obsolete. Mica is not backported. Mica is obsolete. Gneiss has no feature toggle. Talc is not backported. Talc is not reverted. Gneiss is not linted. Mica has a migration script. Mica is not experimental. Mica has no security advisory.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is merged and likewise is backported, so it is not profiled. No. 2 While the given build is merged and likewise is obsolete and likewise has a migration script, so it is profiled. No. 3 While the given build has a changelog and likewise is reverted, so it is not compiled. No. 4 While the given build has a migration script and likewise is obsolete, so it is not merged. No. 5 While the given build is obsolete, so it is merged. No. 6 While the given build has a migration script, so it is compiled. No. 7 While the given build has a feature toggle, so it is not benchmarked. No. 8 While the given build is obsolete and likewise is linted, so it is benchmarked. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given build is experimental and likewise has a security advisory. No. 6 wins over No. 3. No. 4 wins over No. 5. No. 8 wins over No. 7. No. 1 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Mica is profiled\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001735", "pair_id": "u001735-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001735-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d6e7705fa5a868d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001760-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has a notice period of 30. Petra is sponsored. Teodor is sponsored. Hedda is not sponsored. Rune is freelance. Hedda is not bonded. Rune is bonded. Rune is not interviewed. Teodor is not interviewed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is sponsored, it thereby is not certified. Point B. If said candidate is bonded and further has a notice period in excess of 73, it thereby is not a graduate. Point C. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby is seasoned. Point D. If said candidate is bonded, it thereby is not seasoned. Point E. If said candidate is bonded and further has a notice period of maximum 73, it thereby is a graduate. Point F. If said candidate is interviewed and further is bonded, it thereby is recommended. Point G. If said candidate is freelance, it thereby is certified. Point D supersedes Point C. Point B supersedes Point E. Point A supersedes Point G. Question: Statement: Rune is a graduate. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001760", "pair_id": "u001760-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001760-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6606c18203bc64c4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001760-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is sponsored. Rune has a notice period of 30. Petra is sponsored. Teodor is sponsored. Hedda is not sponsored. Rune is freelance. Hedda is not bonded. Rune is bonded. Rune is not interviewed. Teodor is not interviewed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is sponsored, it thereby is not certified. Point B. If said candidate is bonded and further has a notice period in excess of 73, it thereby is not a graduate. Point C. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby is seasoned. Point D. If said candidate is bonded, it thereby is not seasoned. Point E. If said candidate is bonded and further has a notice period of maximum 73, it thereby is a graduate. Point F. If said candidate is interviewed and further is bonded, it thereby is recommended. Point G. If said candidate is freelance, it thereby is certified. Point D supersedes Point C. Point B supersedes Point E. Point A supersedes Point G. Question: Statement: Rune is a graduate. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001760", "pair_id": "u001760-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001760-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d25639d11a9d36e1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001760-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has a notice period of 30. Petra is sponsored. Teodor is sponsored. Hedda is not sponsored. Rune is freelance. Hedda is not bonded. Rune is bonded. Rune is not interviewed. Teodor is not interviewed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it is not certified. No. 2 While the given candidate is bonded and likewise has a notice period that exceeds 73, so it is not a graduate. No. 3 While the given candidate is interviewed, so it is seasoned. No. 4 While the given candidate is bonded, so it is not seasoned. No. 5 While the given candidate is bonded and likewise has a notice period not above 73, so it is a graduate. No. 6 While the given candidate is interviewed and likewise is bonded, so it is recommended. No. 7 While the given candidate is freelance, so it is certified. No. 4 wins over No. 3. No. 2 wins over No. 5. No. 1 wins over No. 7. Question: Is the claim \"Rune is a graduate\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001760", "pair_id": "u001760-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001760-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6606c18203bc64c4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001760-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is sponsored. Rune has a notice period of 30. Petra is sponsored. Teodor is sponsored. Hedda is not sponsored. Rune is freelance. Hedda is not bonded. Rune is bonded. Rune is not interviewed. Teodor is not interviewed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it is not certified. No. 2 While the given candidate is bonded and likewise has a notice period that exceeds 73, so it is not a graduate. No. 3 While the given candidate is interviewed, so it is seasoned. No. 4 While the given candidate is bonded, so it is not seasoned. No. 5 While the given candidate is bonded and likewise has a notice period not above 73, so it is a graduate. No. 6 While the given candidate is interviewed and likewise is bonded, so it is recommended. No. 7 While the given candidate is freelance, so it is certified. No. 4 wins over No. 3. No. 2 wins over No. 5. No. 1 wins over No. 7. Question: Is the claim \"Rune is a graduate\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001760", "pair_id": "u001760-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001760-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d25639d11a9d36e1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001767-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is probationary. Ivo is not recommended. Mads is recommended. Sigrid is not probationary. Sigrid has a notice period of 63. Sigrid is not fingerprinted. Ivo has a notice period of 31.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate has a notice period over 71, it also is certified. Clause 2: once any candidate has a notice period over 29, it also is interviewed. Clause 3: once any candidate is interviewed, it also is a graduate. Clause 4: once any candidate is probationary, it also is not relocating. Clause 5: once any candidate has a notice period over 26, it also has a signing bonus. Clause 6: once any candidate is fingerprinted, it also is not interviewed. Clause 7: once any candidate is recommended, it also is not certified. Clause 8: once any candidate is interviewed, it also is not a graduate. Clause 8 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is recommended. Clause 5 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has a notice period of 41 or less. Clause 3 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is not recommended. Clause 2 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is fingerprinted. Clause 1 overrides Clause 7. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 3 overrides Clause 8. Question: Does it follow that Ivo is a graduate?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001767", "pair_id": "u001767-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001767-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "141a09a1d7c5ab24", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001767-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is probationary. Ivo is recommended. Mads is recommended. Sigrid is not probationary. Sigrid has a notice period of 63. Sigrid is not fingerprinted. Ivo has a notice period of 31.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate has a notice period over 71, it also is certified. Clause 2: once any candidate has a notice period over 29, it also is interviewed. Clause 3: once any candidate is interviewed, it also is a graduate. Clause 4: once any candidate is probationary, it also is not relocating. Clause 5: once any candidate has a notice period over 26, it also has a signing bonus. Clause 6: once any candidate is fingerprinted, it also is not interviewed. Clause 7: once any candidate is recommended, it also is not certified. Clause 8: once any candidate is interviewed, it also is not a graduate. Clause 8 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is recommended. Clause 5 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has a notice period of 41 or less. Clause 3 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is not recommended. Clause 2 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is fingerprinted. Clause 1 overrides Clause 7. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 3 overrides Clause 8. Question: Does it follow that Ivo is a graduate?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001767", "pair_id": "u001767-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001767-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f63d3b327fc6339f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001779-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is budgeted. Electra has industry backing. Gemma has industry backing. Gemma is not budgeted. Electra is preregistered. Gemma is not theoretical. Electra is not theoretical. Deneb is theoretical. Hadar has no industry backing. Deneb is not preregistered. Hadar is not theoretical. Hadar is not preregistered.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is not collaborative, thus it is peer reviewed. Provision 2: when the proposal here is budgeted, thus it is not renewed. Provision 3: when the proposal here is longitudinal, thus it is not peer reviewed. Provision 4: when the proposal here is preregistered, thus it is collaborative. Provision 5: when the proposal here has no patent filing, thus it has a steering committee. Provision 6: when the proposal here is peer reviewed, thus it has a field site. Provision 7: when the proposal here is budgeted, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 8: when the proposal here is not preregistered, thus it is not collaborative. Provision 9: when the proposal here is not preregistered, thus it has a patent filing. Provision 10: when the proposal here is renewed, thus it has no patent filing. Provision 11: when the proposal here is theoretical, thus it is resubmitted. Provision 12: when the proposal here is preregistered, thus it is renewed. Provision 13: when the proposal here has industry backing, thus it is not resubmitted. Provision 10 has no effect when the proposal here is not budgeted. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 13 has priority over Provision 11. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 12. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Which one describes Deneb?", "options": ["has a field site", "has a steering committee"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a field site", "unit_id": "u001779", "pair_id": "u001779-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001779-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3a3dc8861fbd3cf8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a8"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u001779-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is budgeted. Electra has industry backing. Gemma has industry backing. Gemma is not budgeted. Electra is preregistered. Gemma is not theoretical. Electra is not theoretical. Deneb is theoretical. Hadar has no industry backing. Deneb is preregistered. Hadar is not theoretical. Hadar is not preregistered.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is not collaborative, thus it is peer reviewed. Provision 2: when the proposal here is budgeted, thus it is not renewed. Provision 3: when the proposal here is longitudinal, thus it is not peer reviewed. Provision 4: when the proposal here is preregistered, thus it is collaborative. Provision 5: when the proposal here has no patent filing, thus it has a steering committee. Provision 6: when the proposal here is peer reviewed, thus it has a field site. Provision 7: when the proposal here is budgeted, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 8: when the proposal here is not preregistered, thus it is not collaborative. Provision 9: when the proposal here is not preregistered, thus it has a patent filing. Provision 10: when the proposal here is renewed, thus it has no patent filing. Provision 11: when the proposal here is theoretical, thus it is resubmitted. Provision 12: when the proposal here is preregistered, thus it is renewed. Provision 13: when the proposal here has industry backing, thus it is not resubmitted. Provision 10 has no effect when the proposal here is not budgeted. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 13 has priority over Provision 11. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 12. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Which one describes Deneb?", "options": ["has a field site", "has a steering committee"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a steering committee", "unit_id": "u001779", "pair_id": "u001779-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001779-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b28f68f32a6a4f6d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a8"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u001779-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is budgeted. Electra has industry backing. Gemma has industry backing. Gemma is not budgeted. Electra is preregistered. Gemma is not theoretical. Electra is not theoretical. Deneb is theoretical. Hadar has no industry backing. Deneb is not preregistered. Hadar is not theoretical. Hadar is not preregistered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is not collaborative, it thereby is peer reviewed. Point B. If said proposal is budgeted, it thereby is not renewed. Point C. If said proposal is longitudinal, it thereby is not peer reviewed. Point D. If said proposal is preregistered, it thereby is collaborative. Point E. If said proposal has no patent filing, it thereby has a steering committee. Point F. If said proposal is peer reviewed, it thereby has a field site. Point G. If said proposal is budgeted, it thereby is longitudinal. Point H. If said proposal is not preregistered, it thereby is not collaborative. Point I. If said proposal is not preregistered, it thereby has a patent filing. Point J. If said proposal is renewed, it thereby has no patent filing. Point K. If said proposal is theoretical, it thereby is resubmitted. Point L. If said proposal is preregistered, it thereby is renewed. Point M. If said proposal has industry backing, it thereby is not resubmitted. Point J is cancelled if said proposal is not budgeted. Point A supersedes Point C. Point J supersedes Point I. Point M supersedes Point K. Point B supersedes Point L. Point D supersedes Point H. Question: Which choice is true for Deneb?", "options": ["has a field site", "has a steering committee"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a field site", "unit_id": "u001779", "pair_id": "u001779-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001779-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3a3dc8861fbd3cf8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a8"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u001779-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is budgeted. Electra has industry backing. Gemma has industry backing. Gemma is not budgeted. Electra is preregistered. Gemma is not theoretical. Electra is not theoretical. Deneb is theoretical. Hadar has no industry backing. Deneb is preregistered. Hadar is not theoretical. Hadar is not preregistered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is not collaborative, it thereby is peer reviewed. Point B. If said proposal is budgeted, it thereby is not renewed. Point C. If said proposal is longitudinal, it thereby is not peer reviewed. Point D. If said proposal is preregistered, it thereby is collaborative. Point E. If said proposal has no patent filing, it thereby has a steering committee. Point F. If said proposal is peer reviewed, it thereby has a field site. Point G. If said proposal is budgeted, it thereby is longitudinal. Point H. If said proposal is not preregistered, it thereby is not collaborative. Point I. If said proposal is not preregistered, it thereby has a patent filing. Point J. If said proposal is renewed, it thereby has no patent filing. Point K. If said proposal is theoretical, it thereby is resubmitted. Point L. If said proposal is preregistered, it thereby is renewed. Point M. If said proposal has industry backing, it thereby is not resubmitted. Point J is cancelled if said proposal is not budgeted. Point A supersedes Point C. Point J supersedes Point I. Point M supersedes Point K. Point B supersedes Point L. Point D supersedes Point H. Question: Which choice is true for Deneb?", "options": ["has a field site", "has a steering committee"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a steering committee", "unit_id": "u001779", "pair_id": "u001779-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001779-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b28f68f32a6a4f6d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a8"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u001782-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile is not delayed. Ulla is not perishable. Priya is not perishable. Quentin is rerouted. Quentin is perishable. Ulla is delayed. Priya is not damaged. Quentin is damaged. Quentin has no courier. Odile is not rerouted. Priya is labeled. Odile has a courier. Odile is not registered. Quentin is not prepaid. Quentin is not refrigerated. Odile is damaged. Priya has no courier. Ulla has no courier.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is not hazardous provided that it has a courier. Section 2: a parcel is weighed provided that it is not perishable. Section 3: a parcel is palletized provided that it is registered. Section 4: a parcel has a waybill provided that it is prepaid. Section 5: a parcel has no locker slot provided that it is not labeled. Section 6: a parcel has a locker slot provided that it is not registered. Section 7: a parcel is not weighed provided that it is damaged. Section 8: a parcel is sealed provided that it is delayed. Section 9: a parcel is undeliverable provided that it is not prepaid. Section 10: a parcel is hazardous provided that it is not rerouted. Section 11: a parcel is not weighed provided that it is refrigerated. Section 12: a parcel is tracked provided that it is refrigerated. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it is not rerouted. Section 11 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Which statement fits Quentin?", "options": ["is sealed", "has a waybill", "is undeliverable", "is hazardous", "is tracked", "is palletized", "is weighed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is undeliverable", "unit_id": "u001782", "pair_id": "u001782-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001782-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4f134be4fae46e79", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a12", "a7", "a2", "a9", "a16", "a6", "a8"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u001782-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile is not delayed. Ulla is not perishable. Priya is not perishable. Quentin is rerouted. Quentin is perishable. Ulla is delayed. Priya is not damaged. Quentin is damaged. Quentin has a courier. Odile is not rerouted. Priya is labeled. Odile has a courier. Odile is not registered. Quentin is not prepaid. Quentin is not refrigerated. Odile is damaged. Priya has no courier. Ulla has no courier.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is not hazardous provided that it has a courier. Section 2: a parcel is weighed provided that it is not perishable. Section 3: a parcel is palletized provided that it is registered. Section 4: a parcel has a waybill provided that it is prepaid. Section 5: a parcel has no locker slot provided that it is not labeled. Section 6: a parcel has a locker slot provided that it is not registered. Section 7: a parcel is not weighed provided that it is damaged. Section 8: a parcel is sealed provided that it is delayed. Section 9: a parcel is undeliverable provided that it is not prepaid. Section 10: a parcel is hazardous provided that it is not rerouted. Section 11: a parcel is not weighed provided that it is refrigerated. Section 12: a parcel is tracked provided that it is refrigerated. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it is not rerouted. Section 11 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Which statement fits Quentin?", "options": ["is sealed", "has a waybill", "is undeliverable", "is hazardous", "is tracked", "is palletized", "is weighed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is undeliverable", "unit_id": "u001782", "pair_id": "u001782-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001782-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "88e05da49648dd16", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a12", "a7", "a2", "a9", "a16", "a6", "a8"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u001783-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata has no flood coverage. Wanda has a peril factor of 8. Yara has no flood coverage. Wanda has a premium band of 17. Wanda has no flood coverage. Agata has a peril factor of 57. Wanda is litigated. Dmitri has a premium band of 47. Dmitri is covered.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is lapsed, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item B. When the policyholder is lapsed, that policyholder has no roadside assistance. Item C. When the policyholder is litigated, that policyholder is reinstated. Item D. When the policyholder is reinstated, that policyholder is lapsed. Item E. When the policyholder is covered, that policyholder is bundled. Item F. When the policyholder has a peril factor of no more than 7, that policyholder has an adjuster. Item B is suspended when the policyholder has a premium band of no more than 55. Item A is suspended when the policyholder has a premium band of more than 55. Item D is suspended when the policyholder has flood coverage. Question: Can one infer that Wanda has no roadside assistance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001783", "pair_id": "u001783-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001783-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "dbbb794fb3d603fd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001783-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata has no flood coverage. Wanda has a peril factor of 8. Yara has no flood coverage. Wanda has a premium band of 17. Wanda has no flood coverage. Agata has a peril factor of 57. Wanda is litigated. Dmitri has a premium band of 47. Dmitri is covered.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is lapsed, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item B. When the policyholder is lapsed, that policyholder has no roadside assistance. Item C. When the policyholder is litigated, that policyholder is reinstated. Item D. When the policyholder is reinstated, that policyholder is lapsed. Item E. When the policyholder is covered, that policyholder is bundled. Item F. When the policyholder has a peril factor of no more than 76, that policyholder has an adjuster. Item B is suspended when the policyholder has a premium band of no more than 55. Item A is suspended when the policyholder has a premium band of more than 55. Item D is suspended when the policyholder has flood coverage. Question: Can one infer that Wanda has no roadside assistance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001783", "pair_id": "u001783-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001783-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a1c1ebeb749b70e9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001795-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is not renewed. Fomalhaut is not resubmitted. Gemma is not renewed. Fomalhaut has no industry backing. Gemma has a milestone total of 27. Gemma has a team size of 77. Fomalhaut has no ethics clearance. Gemma has industry backing. Fomalhaut is not collaborative. Gemma is budgeted. Gemma is resubmitted. Gemma has a review mark of 8.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has industry backing and additionally has a milestone total less than 26, it then is not endorsed. #2 Each time a proposal is multicenter and additionally has a review mark less than 89 and additionally is interdisciplinary, it then has a field site. #3 Each time a proposal has a postdoc, it then is not multicenter. #4 Each time a proposal is exploratory, it then is multicenter. #5 Each time a proposal is budgeted and additionally has industry backing, it then is interdisciplinary. #6 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance, it then is not exploratory. #7 Each time a proposal has a team size greater than 27, it then is exploratory. #8 Each time a proposal is resubmitted, it then has no seed funding. #9 Each time a proposal is multicenter and additionally has a review mark of 89 or above, it then has no field site. #10 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then has a postdoc. #11 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is endorsed. #6 yields to #7. #3 yields to #4. #1 yields to #11. #2 yields to #9. Question: Do the terms above show that Gemma has no field site?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001795", "pair_id": "u001795-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001795-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4dee887406ffd3a7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001795-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is not renewed. Fomalhaut is not resubmitted. Gemma is not renewed. Fomalhaut has no industry backing. Gemma has a milestone total of 27. Gemma has a team size of 77. Fomalhaut has no ethics clearance. Gemma has industry backing. Fomalhaut is not collaborative. Gemma is budgeted. Gemma is resubmitted. Gemma has a review mark of 8.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has industry backing and additionally has a milestone total less than 40, it then is not endorsed. #2 Each time a proposal is multicenter and additionally has a review mark less than 89 and additionally is interdisciplinary, it then has a field site. #3 Each time a proposal has a postdoc, it then is not multicenter. #4 Each time a proposal is exploratory, it then is multicenter. #5 Each time a proposal is budgeted and additionally has industry backing, it then is interdisciplinary. #6 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance, it then is not exploratory. #7 Each time a proposal has a team size greater than 27, it then is exploratory. #8 Each time a proposal is resubmitted, it then has no seed funding. #9 Each time a proposal is multicenter and additionally has a review mark of 89 or above, it then has no field site. #10 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then has a postdoc. #11 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is endorsed. #6 yields to #7. #3 yields to #4. #1 yields to #11. #2 yields to #9. Question: Do the terms above show that Gemma has no field site?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001795", "pair_id": "u001795-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001795-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4af15b7a8e215e12", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001837-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar has a milestone total of 97. Izar is not multicenter. Izar has a review mark of 75. Izar is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is interdisciplinary, then it has industry backing. (2) If a proposal has ethics clearance, then it is embargoed. (3) If a proposal is not interdisciplinary, then it has ethics clearance. (4) If a proposal has a milestone total below 39, then it is resubmitted. (5) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is preregistered. (6) If a proposal is embargoed, then it has seed funding. (7) If a proposal has a review mark of at most 72, then it is not preregistered. (8) If a proposal has industry backing, then it is not translational. (9) If a proposal is not interdisciplinary, then it has no ethics clearance. (10) If a proposal has industry backing, then it is not resubmitted. (11) If a proposal is not resubmitted, then it has a patent filing. (11) is void if the proposal has a milestone total of at most 83. When (3) and (9) clash, (3) prevails. When (4) and (10) clash, (4) prevails. When (7) and (5) clash, (7) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Izar?", "options": ["has seed funding", "has a patent filing"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a patent filing", "unit_id": "u001837", "pair_id": "u001837-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001837-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1693a4fbb1554ca6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001837-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar has a milestone total of 97. Izar is multicenter. Izar has a review mark of 75. Izar is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is interdisciplinary, then it has industry backing. (2) If a proposal has ethics clearance, then it is embargoed. (3) If a proposal is not interdisciplinary, then it has ethics clearance. (4) If a proposal has a milestone total below 39, then it is resubmitted. (5) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is preregistered. (6) If a proposal is embargoed, then it has seed funding. (7) If a proposal has a review mark of at most 72, then it is not preregistered. (8) If a proposal has industry backing, then it is not translational. (9) If a proposal is not interdisciplinary, then it has no ethics clearance. (10) If a proposal has industry backing, then it is not resubmitted. (11) If a proposal is not resubmitted, then it has a patent filing. (11) is void if the proposal has a milestone total of at most 83. When (3) and (9) clash, (3) prevails. When (4) and (10) clash, (4) prevails. When (7) and (5) clash, (7) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Izar?", "options": ["has seed funding", "has a patent filing"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a patent filing", "unit_id": "u001837", "pair_id": "u001837-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u001837-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "70dad7aad356a47b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u001891-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hamid is foreclosed. Wiebke has a mortgage. Wiebke has a guarantor. Wiebke has an escrow account. Hamid is a depositor. Wiebke is underwritten. Wiebke is foreclosed. Wiebke is not audited.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is underwritten and is foreclosed, then it is refinanced. (2) If a borrower is not audited and has a mortgage and has a guarantor, then it has collateral. (3) If a borrower is audited and is a depositor and has a mortgage, then it has no collateral. (4) If a borrower has an escrow account, then it is not refinanced. (5) If a borrower is underwritten, then it is solvent. When (3) and (2) clash, (3) prevails. When (4) and (1) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Wiebke has collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001891", "pair_id": "u001891-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001891-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "62f630b70f471bab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u001891-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hamid is foreclosed. Wiebke has a mortgage. Wiebke has a guarantor. Wiebke has an escrow account. Hamid is a depositor. Wiebke is underwritten. Wiebke is foreclosed. Wiebke is not audited.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is underwritten and is foreclosed, then it is refinanced. (2) If a borrower is audited and has a mortgage and has a guarantor, then it has collateral. (3) If a borrower is audited and is a depositor and has a mortgage, then it has no collateral. (4) If a borrower has an escrow account, then it is not refinanced. (5) If a borrower is underwritten, then it is solvent. When (3) and (2) clash, (3) prevails. When (4) and (1) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Wiebke has collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001891", "pair_id": "u001891-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001891-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b5b740d7ce9126bd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u001891-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hamid is foreclosed. Wiebke has a mortgage. Wiebke has a guarantor. Wiebke has an escrow account. Hamid is a depositor. Wiebke is underwritten. Wiebke is foreclosed. Wiebke is not audited.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is underwritten, and is foreclosed, that borrower is refinanced. Item B. When the borrower is not audited, and has a mortgage, and has a guarantor, that borrower has collateral. Item C. When the borrower is audited, and is a depositor, and has a mortgage, that borrower has no collateral. Item D. When the borrower has an escrow account, that borrower is not refinanced. Item E. When the borrower is underwritten, that borrower is solvent. Item C outranks Item B. Item D outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Wiebke has collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001891", "pair_id": "u001891-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001891-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "62f630b70f471bab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u001891-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hamid is foreclosed. Wiebke has a mortgage. Wiebke has a guarantor. Wiebke has an escrow account. Hamid is a depositor. Wiebke is underwritten. Wiebke is foreclosed. Wiebke is not audited.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is underwritten, and is foreclosed, that borrower is refinanced. Item B. When the borrower is audited, and has a mortgage, and has a guarantor, that borrower has collateral. Item C. When the borrower is audited, and is a depositor, and has a mortgage, that borrower has no collateral. Item D. When the borrower has an escrow account, that borrower is not refinanced. Item E. When the borrower is underwritten, that borrower is solvent. Item C outranks Item B. Item D outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Wiebke has collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001891", "pair_id": "u001891-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001891-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b5b740d7ce9126bd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u001897-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is replicated. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr is containerized. Vesper has no snapshot.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload has no snapshot, then it is not virtualized. (2) If a workload is containerized, then it has no firewall. (3) If a workload is replicated, then it is virtualized. (4) If a workload has a snapshot, then it is provisioned. (5) If a workload has a firewall, then it is not deprecated. (6) If a workload has no firewall, then it is deprecated. (3) is void if the workload is not idle. (5) is void if the workload is not replicated. (6) is void if the workload is replicated. (6) is void if the workload is replicated. (5) is void if the workload is not idle. When (6) and (5) clash, (6) prevails. When (1) and (3) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Zephyr is deprecated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001897", "pair_id": "u001897-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001897-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e3c261d0b0ccd3e5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u001897-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is replicated. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr is containerized. Vesper has no snapshot.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload has no snapshot, then it is not virtualized. (2) If a workload is containerized, then it has no firewall. (3) If a workload is replicated, then it is virtualized. (4) If a workload has a snapshot, then it is provisioned. (5) If a workload has no firewall, then it is not deprecated. (6) If a workload has no firewall, then it is deprecated. (3) is void if the workload is not idle. (5) is void if the workload is not replicated. (6) is void if the workload is replicated. (6) is void if the workload is replicated. (5) is void if the workload is not idle. When (6) and (5) clash, (6) prevails. When (1) and (3) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Zephyr is deprecated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001897", "pair_id": "u001897-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001897-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "78ad80f08c8e3483", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u001897-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is replicated. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr is containerized. Vesper has no snapshot.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload has no snapshot, it also is not virtualized. Clause 2: once any workload is containerized, it also has no firewall. Clause 3: once any workload is replicated, it also is virtualized. Clause 4: once any workload has a snapshot, it also is provisioned. Clause 5: once any workload has a firewall, it also is not deprecated. Clause 6: once any workload has no firewall, it also is deprecated. Clause 3 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not idle. Clause 5 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not replicated. Clause 6 does not hold for a workload when any workload is replicated. Clause 6 does not hold for a workload when any workload is replicated. Clause 5 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not idle. Clause 6 overrides Clause 5. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Zephyr is deprecated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001897", "pair_id": "u001897-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001897-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e3c261d0b0ccd3e5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u001897-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is replicated. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr is containerized. Vesper has no snapshot.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload has no snapshot, it also is not virtualized. Clause 2: once any workload is containerized, it also has no firewall. Clause 3: once any workload is replicated, it also is virtualized. Clause 4: once any workload has a snapshot, it also is provisioned. Clause 5: once any workload has no firewall, it also is not deprecated. Clause 6: once any workload has no firewall, it also is deprecated. Clause 3 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not idle. Clause 5 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not replicated. Clause 6 does not hold for a workload when any workload is replicated. Clause 6 does not hold for a workload when any workload is replicated. Clause 5 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not idle. Clause 6 overrides Clause 5. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Zephyr is deprecated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u001897", "pair_id": "u001897-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001897-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "78ad80f08c8e3483", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u001915-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has no roadside assistance. Yara is not reinstated. Yara has a peril factor of 38. Yara has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is not reinstated, it thereby has an adjuster. Point B. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby is inspected. Point C. If said policyholder has an adjuster, it thereby is a claimant. Point D. If said policyholder has roadside assistance, it thereby is a smoker. Point E. If said policyholder has an adjuster, it thereby is not a claimant. Point F. If said policyholder has an adjuster, it thereby is not covered. Point C is cancelled if said policyholder is indemnified. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder has a peril factor in excess of 50. Point C is cancelled if said policyholder has a peril factor of maximum 50. Question: Statement: Yara is not a claimant. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001915", "pair_id": "u001915-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001915-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "479a562cf6e1bf55", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001915-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has no roadside assistance. Yara is not reinstated. Yara has a peril factor of 38. Yara has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby has an adjuster. Point B. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby is inspected. Point C. If said policyholder has an adjuster, it thereby is a claimant. Point D. If said policyholder has roadside assistance, it thereby is a smoker. Point E. If said policyholder has an adjuster, it thereby is not a claimant. Point F. If said policyholder has an adjuster, it thereby is not covered. Point C is cancelled if said policyholder is indemnified. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder has a peril factor in excess of 50. Point C is cancelled if said policyholder has a peril factor of maximum 50. Question: Statement: Yara is not a claimant. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001915", "pair_id": "u001915-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001915-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0a93215a09d03c01", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001915-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has no roadside assistance. Yara is not reinstated. Yara has a peril factor of 38. Yara has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is not reinstated, so it has an adjuster. No. 2 While the given policyholder has flood coverage, so it is inspected. No. 3 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is a claimant. No. 4 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it is a smoker. No. 5 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is not a claimant. No. 6 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is not covered. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is indemnified. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a peril factor that exceeds 50. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a peril factor not above 50. Question: Is the claim \"Yara is not a claimant\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u001915", "pair_id": "u001915-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001915-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "479a562cf6e1bf55", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001915-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has no roadside assistance. Yara is not reinstated. Yara has a peril factor of 38. Yara has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it has an adjuster. No. 2 While the given policyholder has flood coverage, so it is inspected. No. 3 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is a claimant. No. 4 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it is a smoker. No. 5 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is not a claimant. No. 6 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is not covered. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is indemnified. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a peril factor that exceeds 50. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a peril factor not above 50. Question: Is the claim \"Yara is not a claimant\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u001915", "pair_id": "u001915-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001915-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0a93215a09d03c01", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u001958-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xenia has a pulse rate of 7. Zora has a pain level of 38. Benedek is fasting. Aurel is bedridden. Zora is not bedridden. Zora has a pulse rate of 28. Benedek has a pain level of 91. Aurel is fasting.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is anemic, it thereby has an interpreter. Point B. If said patient has a pain level of minimum 75, it thereby is pregnant. Point C. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is not symptomatic. Point D. If said patient has a pain level short of 19, it thereby is not asthmatic. Point E. If said patient has a pain level in excess of 42, it thereby is asthmatic. Point F. If said patient is fasting, it thereby has no pacemaker. Point G. If said patient has a pulse rate of maximum 29, it thereby is not discharged. Point H. If said patient has a pain level short of 25, it thereby is not anemic. Point I. If said patient is discharged, it thereby is triaged. Point J. If said patient has a pain level of minimum 52, it thereby is discharged. Point K. If said patient has a pain level in excess of 13, it thereby is not pregnant. Point L. If said patient has a pain level short of 52, it thereby is anemic. Point M. If said patient has a pacemaker, it thereby is ambulatory. Point N. If said patient is fasting, it thereby has a pacemaker. Point N supersedes Point F. Point B supersedes Point K. Point E supersedes Point D. Point H supersedes Point L. Point J supersedes Point G. Question: Which choice is true for Zora?", "options": ["has an interpreter", "is ambulatory", "is triaged"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has an interpreter", "unit_id": "u001958", "pair_id": "u001958-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001958-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f07260124833a508", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a11", "a0", "a5"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u001958-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xenia has a pulse rate of 7. Zora has a pain level of 38. Benedek is fasting. Aurel is bedridden. Zora is not bedridden. Zora has a pulse rate of 34. Benedek has a pain level of 91. Aurel is fasting.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is anemic, it thereby has an interpreter. Point B. If said patient has a pain level of minimum 75, it thereby is pregnant. Point C. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is not symptomatic. Point D. If said patient has a pain level short of 19, it thereby is not asthmatic. Point E. If said patient has a pain level in excess of 42, it thereby is asthmatic. Point F. If said patient is fasting, it thereby has no pacemaker. Point G. If said patient has a pulse rate of maximum 29, it thereby is not discharged. Point H. If said patient has a pain level short of 25, it thereby is not anemic. Point I. If said patient is discharged, it thereby is triaged. Point J. If said patient has a pain level of minimum 52, it thereby is discharged. Point K. If said patient has a pain level in excess of 13, it thereby is not pregnant. Point L. If said patient has a pain level short of 52, it thereby is anemic. Point M. If said patient has a pacemaker, it thereby is ambulatory. Point N. If said patient is fasting, it thereby has a pacemaker. Point N supersedes Point F. Point B supersedes Point K. Point E supersedes Point D. Point H supersedes Point L. Point J supersedes Point G. Question: Which choice is true for Zora?", "options": ["has an interpreter", "is ambulatory", "is triaged"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has an interpreter", "unit_id": "u001958", "pair_id": "u001958-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u001958-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "611c3d752030338f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a11", "a0", "a5"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u002007-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper has a memory allotment of 91. Halcyon is throttled. Vesper is not throttled. Nimbus has a failover node. Halcyon has a latency budget of 68. Nimbus has a latency budget of 2. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 90. Vesper has no failover node. Nimbus has a memory allotment of 86. Nimbus is throttled.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is throttled, thus it is encrypted. Provision 2: when the workload here is throttled, thus it is not encrypted. Provision 3: when the workload here has a memory allotment beneath 47, thus it has no snapshot. Provision 4: when the workload here has a latency budget beyond 45, thus it has a snapshot. Provision 5: when the workload here is throttled, thus it is deprecated. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Halcyon has a failover node?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002007", "pair_id": "u002007-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002007-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e9e1a645b4b06d00", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002007-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon has a failover node. Vesper has a memory allotment of 91. Halcyon is throttled. Vesper is not throttled. Nimbus has a failover node. Halcyon has a latency budget of 68. Nimbus has a latency budget of 2. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 90. Vesper has no failover node. Nimbus has a memory allotment of 86. Nimbus is throttled.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is throttled, thus it is encrypted. Provision 2: when the workload here is throttled, thus it is not encrypted. Provision 3: when the workload here has a memory allotment beneath 47, thus it has no snapshot. Provision 4: when the workload here has a latency budget beyond 45, thus it has a snapshot. Provision 5: when the workload here is throttled, thus it is deprecated. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Halcyon has a failover node?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002007", "pair_id": "u002007-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002007-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8ebe8d44442afc9b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002039-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is tagged. Zircon is not versioned.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is not documented. Policy II. Suppose that build has a migration script: then it is not profiled. Policy III. Suppose that build is benchmarked: then it is profiled. Policy IV. Suppose that build is not tagged: then it is benchmarked. Policy V. Suppose that build is versioned: then it is not tested. Policy VI. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is notarized. Policy VII. Suppose that build is versioned: then it has a migration script. Question: Is it so that Zircon is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002039", "pair_id": "u002039-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002039-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "e9f39e75b815807a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002039-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is tagged. Zircon is not versioned.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is not documented. Policy II. Suppose that build has a migration script: then it is not profiled. Policy III. Suppose that build is benchmarked: then it is profiled. Policy IV. Suppose that build is tagged: then it is benchmarked. Policy V. Suppose that build is versioned: then it is not tested. Policy VI. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is notarized. Policy VII. Suppose that build is versioned: then it has a migration script. Question: Is it so that Zircon is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002039", "pair_id": "u002039-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002039-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "9a663dc4a3e56675", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002039-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is tagged. Zircon is not versioned.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a changelog, it then is not documented. #2 Each time a build has a migration script, it then is not profiled. #3 Each time a build is benchmarked, it then is profiled. #4 Each time a build is not tagged, it then is benchmarked. #5 Each time a build is versioned, it then is not tested. #6 Each time a build has a changelog, it then is notarized. #7 Each time a build is versioned, it then has a migration script. Question: Do the terms above show that Zircon is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002039", "pair_id": "u002039-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002039-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "e9f39e75b815807a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002039-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is tagged. Zircon is not versioned.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a changelog, it then is not documented. #2 Each time a build has a migration script, it then is not profiled. #3 Each time a build is benchmarked, it then is profiled. #4 Each time a build is tagged, it then is benchmarked. #5 Each time a build is versioned, it then is not tested. #6 Each time a build has a changelog, it then is notarized. #7 Each time a build is versioned, it then has a migration script. Question: Do the terms above show that Zircon is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002039", "pair_id": "u002039-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002039-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "9a663dc4a3e56675", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002069-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jory is not damaged. Jory is oversized. Jory has a parcel volume of 49. Odile has no waybill. Rasmus is damaged. Rasmus is not oversized. Jory has no waybill. Odile has a parcel volume of 16. Rasmus has a waybill.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is not oversized. Section 2: a parcel is delayed provided that it has a parcel volume of 21 or lower. Section 3: a parcel is stamped provided that it is damaged. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it is oversized. Section 2 lapses for a parcel if it is damaged. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it has a waybill. Question: Jory is registered. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002069", "pair_id": "u002069-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002069-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e0a06876fb866956", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002069-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jory is not damaged. Jory is oversized. Jory has a parcel volume of 49. Odile has no waybill. Rasmus is damaged. Rasmus is not oversized. Jory has no waybill. Jory is registered. Odile has a parcel volume of 16. Rasmus has a waybill.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is not oversized. Section 2: a parcel is delayed provided that it has a parcel volume of 21 or lower. Section 3: a parcel is stamped provided that it is damaged. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it is oversized. Section 2 lapses for a parcel if it is damaged. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it has a waybill. Question: Jory is registered. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002069", "pair_id": "u002069-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002069-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c7b36040f1d28bc6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002069-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jory is not damaged. Jory is oversized. Jory has a parcel volume of 49. Odile has no waybill. Rasmus is damaged. Rasmus is not oversized. Jory has no waybill. Odile has a parcel volume of 16. Rasmus has a waybill.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not oversized: then it has a barcode. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume no higher than 21: then it is delayed. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is damaged: then it is stamped. Policy III is waived if that parcel is oversized. Policy II is waived if that parcel is damaged. Policy I is waived if that parcel has a waybill. Question: Is it so that Jory is registered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002069", "pair_id": "u002069-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002069-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e0a06876fb866956", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002069-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jory is not damaged. Jory is oversized. Jory has a parcel volume of 49. Odile has no waybill. Rasmus is damaged. Rasmus is not oversized. Jory has no waybill. Jory is registered. Odile has a parcel volume of 16. Rasmus has a waybill.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not oversized: then it has a barcode. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume no higher than 21: then it is delayed. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is damaged: then it is stamped. Policy III is waived if that parcel is oversized. Policy II is waived if that parcel is damaged. Policy I is waived if that parcel has a waybill. Question: Is it so that Jory is registered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002069", "pair_id": "u002069-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002069-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c7b36040f1d28bc6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002069-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jory is not damaged. Jory is oversized. Jory has a parcel volume of 49. Odile has no waybill. Rasmus is damaged. Rasmus is not oversized. Jory has no waybill. Odile has a parcel volume of 16. Rasmus has a waybill.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is not oversized, it then has a barcode. #2 Each time a parcel has a parcel volume of 21 or below, it then is delayed. #3 Each time a parcel is damaged, it then is stamped. #3 is set aside if a parcel is oversized. #2 is set aside if a parcel is damaged. #1 is set aside if a parcel has a waybill. Question: Do the terms above show that Jory is registered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002069", "pair_id": "u002069-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002069-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e0a06876fb866956", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002069-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jory is not damaged. Jory is oversized. Jory has a parcel volume of 49. Odile has no waybill. Rasmus is damaged. Rasmus is not oversized. Jory has no waybill. Jory is registered. Odile has a parcel volume of 16. Rasmus has a waybill.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is not oversized, it then has a barcode. #2 Each time a parcel has a parcel volume of 21 or below, it then is delayed. #3 Each time a parcel is damaged, it then is stamped. #3 is set aside if a parcel is oversized. #2 is set aside if a parcel is damaged. #1 is set aside if a parcel has a waybill. Question: Do the terms above show that Jory is registered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002069", "pair_id": "u002069-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002069-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c7b36040f1d28bc6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002081-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not anemic. Wendel is not anemic. Elif is contagious. Xenia is contagious. Xenia is vaccinated. Elif is vaccinated. Elif has a fever reading of 49. Zora has a fever reading of 62. Xenia has a fever reading of 54. Wendel is vaccinated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a fever reading under 37 and also is anemic and also is not vaccinated, it also is waitlisted. Clause 2: once any patient is contagious, it also is sedated. Clause 3: once any patient is not anemic and also is not contagious, it also is referred. Question: Does it follow that Wendel is contagious?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002081", "pair_id": "u002081-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002081-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8fd8f7af68a37eff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u002081-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not anemic. Wendel is not anemic. Elif is contagious. Xenia is contagious. Xenia is vaccinated. Elif is vaccinated. Elif has a fever reading of 49. Zora has a fever reading of 62. Wendel is not contagious. Xenia has a fever reading of 54. Wendel is vaccinated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a fever reading under 37 and also is anemic and also is not vaccinated, it also is waitlisted. Clause 2: once any patient is contagious, it also is sedated. Clause 3: once any patient is not anemic and also is not contagious, it also is referred. Question: Does it follow that Wendel is contagious?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002081", "pair_id": "u002081-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002081-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "754ae8d53ae8e0fb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u002091-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not obsolete. Schist is not fuzzed. Schist is not obsolete. Schist is not experimental. Quartz is fuzzed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is experimental, it thereby is minified. Point B. If said build is not obsolete, it thereby is notarized. Point C. If said build is fuzzed, it thereby is not compiled. Point D. If said build has a migration script, it thereby is reproducible. Point E. If said build is notarized, it thereby has a migration script. Point F. If said build is minified, it thereby is tested. Point G. If said build has a migration script, it thereby has no feature toggle. Point H. If said build is tested, it thereby is not reproducible. Question: Statement: Schist is reproducible. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002091", "pair_id": "u002091-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002091-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "0191ea8af58fee6d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002091-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not obsolete. Schist is not fuzzed. Schist is not obsolete. Schist is not experimental. Quartz is fuzzed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is experimental, it thereby is minified. Point B. If said build is obsolete, it thereby is notarized. Point C. If said build is fuzzed, it thereby is not compiled. Point D. If said build has a migration script, it thereby is reproducible. Point E. If said build is notarized, it thereby has a migration script. Point F. If said build is minified, it thereby is tested. Point G. If said build has a migration script, it thereby has no feature toggle. Point H. If said build is tested, it thereby is not reproducible. Question: Statement: Schist is reproducible. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002091", "pair_id": "u002091-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002091-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "bd16babb992672d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002091-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not obsolete. Schist is not fuzzed. Schist is not obsolete. Schist is not experimental. Quartz is fuzzed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is experimental, so it is minified. No. 2 While the given build is not obsolete, so it is notarized. No. 3 While the given build is fuzzed, so it is not compiled. No. 4 While the given build has a migration script, so it is reproducible. No. 5 While the given build is notarized, so it has a migration script. No. 6 While the given build is minified, so it is tested. No. 7 While the given build has a migration script, so it has no feature toggle. No. 8 While the given build is tested, so it is not reproducible. Question: Is the claim \"Schist is reproducible\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002091", "pair_id": "u002091-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002091-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "0191ea8af58fee6d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002091-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not obsolete. Schist is not fuzzed. Schist is not obsolete. Schist is not experimental. Quartz is fuzzed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is experimental, so it is minified. No. 2 While the given build is obsolete, so it is notarized. No. 3 While the given build is fuzzed, so it is not compiled. No. 4 While the given build has a migration script, so it is reproducible. No. 5 While the given build is notarized, so it has a migration script. No. 6 While the given build is minified, so it is tested. No. 7 While the given build has a migration script, so it has no feature toggle. No. 8 While the given build is tested, so it is not reproducible. Question: Is the claim \"Schist is reproducible\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002091", "pair_id": "u002091-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002091-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "bd16babb992672d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002093-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aurel has a pain level of 93. Aurel has a fever reading of 45. Xenia has a pulse rate of 79. Xenia has no caregiver. Dorian has a pain level of 88. Xenia is not bedridden. Xenia is symptomatic. Xenia has a mobility rank of 27. Aurel is symptomatic. Xenia has a fever reading of 47. Xenia is rescheduled. Dorian has a caregiver. Xenia has a pain level of 99.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is fasting and likewise is symptomatic, so it is admitted. No. 2 While the given patient is admitted and likewise has a mobility rank not above 52, so it is contagious. No. 3 While the given patient is admitted and likewise has a mobility rank that exceeds 52, so it is allergic. No. 4 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise has a fever reading not above 63, so it is fasting. No. 5 While the given patient is admitted and likewise is asthmatic and likewise has a mobility rank not below 26, so it is vaccinated. No. 6 While the given patient has no caregiver and likewise has a pain level that exceeds 48, so it is not pregnant. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given patient is asthmatic and likewise is rescheduled. Question: Select what holds for Xenia: which option?", "options": ["is vaccinated", "is contagious", "is allergic"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is contagious", "unit_id": "u002093", "pair_id": "u002093-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002093-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "937d6c12508d2e04", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u002093-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aurel has a pain level of 93. Aurel has a fever reading of 45. Xenia has a pulse rate of 79. Xenia has no caregiver. Dorian has a pain level of 88. Xenia is not bedridden. Xenia is symptomatic. Xenia has a mobility rank of 98. Aurel is symptomatic. Xenia has a fever reading of 47. Xenia is rescheduled. Dorian has a caregiver. Xenia has a pain level of 99.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is fasting and likewise is symptomatic, so it is admitted. No. 2 While the given patient is admitted and likewise has a mobility rank not above 52, so it is contagious. No. 3 While the given patient is admitted and likewise has a mobility rank that exceeds 52, so it is allergic. No. 4 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise has a fever reading not above 63, so it is fasting. No. 5 While the given patient is admitted and likewise is asthmatic and likewise has a mobility rank not below 26, so it is vaccinated. No. 6 While the given patient has no caregiver and likewise has a pain level that exceeds 48, so it is not pregnant. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given patient is asthmatic and likewise is rescheduled. Question: Select what holds for Xenia: which option?", "options": ["is vaccinated", "is contagious", "is allergic"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is allergic", "unit_id": "u002093", "pair_id": "u002093-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002093-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "028a822b8fc1bee4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u002094-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel is not symptomatic. Aurel is admitted. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Aurel is not rescheduled.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has a caregiver provided that it is rescheduled. Section 2: a patient is not postoperative provided that it is symptomatic. Section 3: a patient is asthmatic provided that it has a caregiver. Section 4: a patient is not asthmatic provided that it is not hypertensive. Section 5: a patient is not hypertensive provided that it is not admitted. Question: Aurel is asthmatic. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002094", "pair_id": "u002094-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002094-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "fa03062b3d85b1eb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002094-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel is not symptomatic. Aurel is admitted. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Aurel is not rescheduled.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has a caregiver provided that it is not rescheduled. Section 2: a patient is not postoperative provided that it is symptomatic. Section 3: a patient is asthmatic provided that it has a caregiver. Section 4: a patient is not asthmatic provided that it is not hypertensive. Section 5: a patient is not hypertensive provided that it is not admitted. Question: Aurel is asthmatic. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002094", "pair_id": "u002094-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002094-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "ee8a26d78087f14e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002108-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is a claimant. Zdenek is not litigated. Zdenek is lapsed. Zdenek has a beneficiary. Zdenek is covered. Zdenek has flood coverage. Zdenek is grandfathered.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has no beneficiary and is not grandfathered and is not litigated, then it has roadside assistance. (2) If a policyholder has flood coverage and has a premium discount, then it is not inspected. (3) If a policyholder is not covered and has no flood coverage, then it has a deductible waiver. (4) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it is inspected. (5) If a policyholder has no flood coverage, then it has no deductible waiver. (6) If a policyholder is inspected and is not a claimant and is not lapsed, then it is subrogated. (7) If a policyholder is inspected and is a claimant and has a beneficiary, then it is not subrogated. (7) is void if the policyholder is not litigated and has a rider. (3) is void if the policyholder has a premium discount. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. When (2) and (4) clash, (2) prevails. When (6) and (7) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Zdenek is subrogated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002108", "pair_id": "u002108-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002108-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6077ca2bb7a6ce2a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 55}}
{"id": "syn-u002108-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is a claimant. Zdenek is not litigated. Zdenek is lapsed. Zdenek has a beneficiary. Zdenek is covered. Zdenek has flood coverage. Zdenek is grandfathered. Zdenek has a rider.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has no beneficiary and is not grandfathered and is not litigated, then it has roadside assistance. (2) If a policyholder has flood coverage and has a premium discount, then it is not inspected. (3) If a policyholder is not covered and has no flood coverage, then it has a deductible waiver. (4) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it is inspected. (5) If a policyholder has no flood coverage, then it has no deductible waiver. (6) If a policyholder is inspected and is not a claimant and is not lapsed, then it is subrogated. (7) If a policyholder is inspected and is a claimant and has a beneficiary, then it is not subrogated. (7) is void if the policyholder is not litigated and has a rider. (3) is void if the policyholder has a premium discount. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. When (2) and (4) clash, (2) prevails. When (6) and (7) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Zdenek is subrogated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002108", "pair_id": "u002108-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002108-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a7376c94fe725629", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 55}}
{"id": "syn-u002108-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is a claimant. Zdenek is not litigated. Zdenek is lapsed. Zdenek has a beneficiary. Zdenek is covered. Zdenek has flood coverage. Zdenek is grandfathered.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has no beneficiary, and is not grandfathered, and is not litigated, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item B. When the policyholder has flood coverage, and has a premium discount, that policyholder is not inspected. Item C. When the policyholder is not covered, and has no flood coverage, that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Item D. When the policyholder has a beneficiary, that policyholder is inspected. Item E. When the policyholder has no flood coverage, that policyholder has no deductible waiver. Item F. When the policyholder is inspected, and is not a claimant, and is not lapsed, that policyholder is subrogated. Item G. When the policyholder is inspected, and is a claimant, and has a beneficiary, that policyholder is not subrogated. Item G is suspended when the policyholder is not litigated, and has a rider. Item C is suspended when the policyholder has a premium discount. Item C outranks Item E. Item B outranks Item D. Item F outranks Item G. Question: Can one infer that Zdenek is subrogated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002108", "pair_id": "u002108-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002108-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6077ca2bb7a6ce2a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 55}}
{"id": "syn-u002108-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is a claimant. Zdenek is not litigated. Zdenek is lapsed. Zdenek has a beneficiary. Zdenek is covered. Zdenek has flood coverage. Zdenek is grandfathered. Zdenek has a rider.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has no beneficiary, and is not grandfathered, and is not litigated, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item B. When the policyholder has flood coverage, and has a premium discount, that policyholder is not inspected. Item C. When the policyholder is not covered, and has no flood coverage, that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Item D. When the policyholder has a beneficiary, that policyholder is inspected. Item E. When the policyholder has no flood coverage, that policyholder has no deductible waiver. Item F. When the policyholder is inspected, and is not a claimant, and is not lapsed, that policyholder is subrogated. Item G. When the policyholder is inspected, and is a claimant, and has a beneficiary, that policyholder is not subrogated. Item G is suspended when the policyholder is not litigated, and has a rider. Item C is suspended when the policyholder has a premium discount. Item C outranks Item E. Item B outranks Item D. Item F outranks Item G. Question: Can one infer that Zdenek is subrogated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002108", "pair_id": "u002108-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002108-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a7376c94fe725629", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 55}}
{"id": "syn-u002120-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel has a GPU. Halcyon has a replica count of 74. Halcyon is not throttled. Kestrel is throttled. Kestrel is not backed up. Kestrel is not sharded. Tundra is not backed up. Halcyon is sharded. Halcyon has a GPU. Halcyon is not monitored. Halcyon is not idle.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is not replicated and is throttled and is monitored, then it has a public endpoint. (2) If a workload is backed up and has a GPU and has a replica count of at most 48, then it is autoscaled. (3) If a workload is not replicated, then it is not virtualized. (4) If a workload is idle, then it has a dedicated host. (5) If a workload has a snapshot and has a GPU, then it is not replicated. (6) If a workload is not replicated and is not throttled, then it has no public endpoint. (7) If a workload is sharded, then it has a snapshot. Question: Is it true that Halcyon has a public endpoint?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002120", "pair_id": "u002120-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002120-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a97f625bed17b6c0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u002120-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel has a GPU. Halcyon has a replica count of 74. Halcyon is not throttled. Kestrel is throttled. Kestrel is not backed up. Kestrel is not sharded. Tundra is not backed up. Halcyon is sharded. Halcyon has a GPU. Halcyon is not monitored. Halcyon is not idle.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is not replicated and is throttled and is monitored, then it has a public endpoint. (2) If a workload is backed up and has a GPU and has a replica count of at most 48, then it is autoscaled. (3) If a workload is not replicated, then it is not virtualized. (4) If a workload is idle, then it has a dedicated host. (5) If a workload has a snapshot and has a GPU, then it is not replicated. (6) If a workload is not replicated and is not throttled, then it has no public endpoint. (7) If a workload is not sharded, then it has a snapshot. Question: Is it true that Halcyon has a public endpoint?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002120", "pair_id": "u002120-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002120-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "32aeb0ff8799261b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u002214-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel has a pulse rate of 64. Aurel has a fever reading of 29.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has a pulse rate smaller than 47: then it is not fasting. Policy II. Suppose that patient has a chaperone: then it is referred. Policy III. Suppose that patient is admitted: then it is symptomatic. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is admitted: then it is allergic. Policy V. Suppose that patient has a fever reading higher than 21: then it is not referred. Question: Is it so that Aurel is not referred?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002214", "pair_id": "u002214-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002214-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "dfc1e2e5c9c327b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002214-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel has a pulse rate of 64. Aurel has a fever reading of 29.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has a pulse rate smaller than 47: then it is not fasting. Policy II. Suppose that patient has a chaperone: then it is referred. Policy III. Suppose that patient is admitted: then it is symptomatic. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is admitted: then it is allergic. Policy V. Suppose that patient has a fever reading no higher than 21: then it is not referred. Question: Is it so that Aurel is not referred?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002214", "pair_id": "u002214-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002214-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "1546407fc08d7e30", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002228-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima has a pulse rate of 16. Vilja has a pulse rate of 69. Cosima is allergic. Vilja is not allergic. Vilja has no caregiver. Yusuf has a pulse rate of 75. Cosima is not discharged. Yusuf is allergic.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is bedridden, then it is diabetic. (2) If a patient is allergic, then it is bedridden. (3) If a patient is discharged, then it is referred. (4) If a patient has a caregiver, then it is not rescheduled. (5) If a patient is referred, then it is not ambulatory. (6) If a patient is bedridden, then it is ambulatory. Question: Is it true that Cosima is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002228", "pair_id": "u002228-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002228-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "601908e9a0440f5a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002228-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima has a pulse rate of 16. Vilja has a pulse rate of 69. Cosima is allergic. Vilja is not allergic. Vilja has no caregiver. Yusuf has a pulse rate of 75. Cosima is not discharged. Yusuf is allergic.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is bedridden, then it is diabetic. (2) If a patient is allergic, then it is bedridden. (3) If a patient is discharged, then it is referred. (4) If a patient has a caregiver, then it is not rescheduled. (5) If a patient is referred, then it is not ambulatory. (6) If a patient has a pulse rate of at most 59, then it has a chaperone. (7) If a patient is bedridden, then it is ambulatory. Question: Is it true that Cosima is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002228", "pair_id": "u002228-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002228-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "b2a628bb96c848ac", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002228-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima has a pulse rate of 16. Vilja has a pulse rate of 69. Cosima is allergic. Vilja is not allergic. Vilja has no caregiver. Yusuf has a pulse rate of 75. Cosima is not discharged. Yusuf is allergic.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is diabetic. Item B. When the patient is allergic, that patient is bedridden. Item C. When the patient is discharged, that patient is referred. Item D. When the patient has a caregiver, that patient is not rescheduled. Item E. When the patient is referred, that patient is not ambulatory. Item F. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is ambulatory. Question: Can one infer that Cosima is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002228", "pair_id": "u002228-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002228-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "601908e9a0440f5a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002228-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima has a pulse rate of 16. Vilja has a pulse rate of 69. Cosima is allergic. Vilja is not allergic. Vilja has no caregiver. Yusuf has a pulse rate of 75. Cosima is not discharged. Yusuf is allergic.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is diabetic. Item B. When the patient is allergic, that patient is bedridden. Item C. When the patient is discharged, that patient is referred. Item D. When the patient has a caregiver, that patient is not rescheduled. Item E. When the patient is referred, that patient is not ambulatory. Item F. When the patient has a pulse rate of no more than 59, that patient has a chaperone. Item G. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is ambulatory. Question: Can one infer that Cosima is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002228", "pair_id": "u002228-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002228-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "b2a628bb96c848ac", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002251-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena is not merged. Quartz is not obsolete. Talc is minified. Talc is fuzzed. Quartz is not benchmarked. Talc is localized. Talc is not notarized. Talc has a feature toggle. Pumice is tagged. Talc is not tagged. Quartz is signed. Galena is not benchmarked. Talc is not obsolete. Galena has a feature toggle. Talc is documented. Galena is not documented. Talc is signed. Pumice is not benchmarked. Quartz is not tagged. Talc is tested. Pumice is minified. Quartz is not tested.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is not backported and is documented and is not tagged, then it is not compiled. (2) If a build is not reverted and is minified and is obsolete, then it is versioned. (3) If a build has a feature toggle and is obsolete, then it has a changelog. (4) If a build is not notarized and is fuzzed, then it is not linted. (5) If a build has a feature toggle and is not merged and is not signed, then it is reverted. (6) If a build has a feature toggle and is not obsolete and is tested, then it is backported. (7) If a build has a feature toggle and is not localized, then it is experimental. (8) If a build has a feature toggle and is merged, then it has a security advisory. (9) If a build has a feature toggle and is localized and is benchmarked, then it is flaky. Question: Which option holds for Talc?", "options": ["is flaky", "has a changelog", "has a security advisory", "is experimental", "is reverted", "is backported"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is backported", "unit_id": "u002251", "pair_id": "u002251-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002251-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "fdd2e94f0538155d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a16", "a19", "a2", "a20", "a9"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u002251-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena is not merged. Quartz is not obsolete. Talc is minified. Talc is not fuzzed. Quartz is not benchmarked. Talc is localized. Talc is not notarized. Talc has a feature toggle. Pumice is tagged. Talc is not tagged. Quartz is signed. Galena is not benchmarked. Talc is not obsolete. Galena has a feature toggle. Talc is documented. Galena is not documented. Talc is signed. Pumice is not benchmarked. Quartz is not tagged. Talc is tested. Pumice is minified. Quartz is not tested.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is not backported and is documented and is not tagged, then it is not compiled. (2) If a build is not reverted and is minified and is obsolete, then it is versioned. (3) If a build has a feature toggle and is obsolete, then it has a changelog. (4) If a build is not notarized and is fuzzed, then it is not linted. (5) If a build has a feature toggle and is not merged and is not signed, then it is reverted. (6) If a build has a feature toggle and is not obsolete and is tested, then it is backported. (7) If a build has a feature toggle and is not localized, then it is experimental. (8) If a build has a feature toggle and is merged, then it has a security advisory. (9) If a build has a feature toggle and is localized and is benchmarked, then it is flaky. Question: Which option holds for Talc?", "options": ["is flaky", "has a changelog", "has a security advisory", "is experimental", "is reverted", "is backported"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is backported", "unit_id": "u002251", "pair_id": "u002251-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002251-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "840e3b38163bee04", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a16", "a19", "a2", "a20", "a9"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u002251-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena is not merged. Quartz is not obsolete. Talc is minified. Talc is fuzzed. Quartz is not benchmarked. Talc is localized. Talc is not notarized. Talc has a feature toggle. Pumice is tagged. Talc is not tagged. Quartz is signed. Galena is not benchmarked. Talc is not obsolete. Galena has a feature toggle. Talc is documented. Galena is not documented. Talc is signed. Pumice is not benchmarked. Quartz is not tagged. Talc is tested. Pumice is minified. Quartz is not tested.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is not backported and also is documented and also is not tagged, it also is not compiled. Clause 2: once any build is not reverted and also is minified and also is obsolete, it also is versioned. Clause 3: once any build has a feature toggle and also is obsolete, it also has a changelog. Clause 4: once any build is not notarized and also is fuzzed, it also is not linted. Clause 5: once any build has a feature toggle and also is not merged and also is not signed, it also is reverted. Clause 6: once any build has a feature toggle and also is not obsolete and also is tested, it also is backported. Clause 7: once any build has a feature toggle and also is not localized, it also is experimental. Clause 8: once any build has a feature toggle and also is merged, it also has a security advisory. Clause 9: once any build has a feature toggle and also is localized and also is benchmarked, it also is flaky. Question: Which of these is true of Talc?", "options": ["is flaky", "has a changelog", "has a security advisory", "is experimental", "is reverted", "is backported"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is backported", "unit_id": "u002251", "pair_id": "u002251-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002251-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "fdd2e94f0538155d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a16", "a19", "a2", "a20", "a9"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u002251-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena is not merged. Quartz is not obsolete. Talc is minified. Talc is not fuzzed. Quartz is not benchmarked. Talc is localized. Talc is not notarized. Talc has a feature toggle. Pumice is tagged. Talc is not tagged. Quartz is signed. Galena is not benchmarked. Talc is not obsolete. Galena has a feature toggle. Talc is documented. Galena is not documented. Talc is signed. Pumice is not benchmarked. Quartz is not tagged. Talc is tested. Pumice is minified. Quartz is not tested.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is not backported and also is documented and also is not tagged, it also is not compiled. Clause 2: once any build is not reverted and also is minified and also is obsolete, it also is versioned. Clause 3: once any build has a feature toggle and also is obsolete, it also has a changelog. Clause 4: once any build is not notarized and also is fuzzed, it also is not linted. Clause 5: once any build has a feature toggle and also is not merged and also is not signed, it also is reverted. Clause 6: once any build has a feature toggle and also is not obsolete and also is tested, it also is backported. Clause 7: once any build has a feature toggle and also is not localized, it also is experimental. Clause 8: once any build has a feature toggle and also is merged, it also has a security advisory. Clause 9: once any build has a feature toggle and also is localized and also is benchmarked, it also is flaky. Question: Which of these is true of Talc?", "options": ["is flaky", "has a changelog", "has a security advisory", "is experimental", "is reverted", "is backported"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is backported", "unit_id": "u002251", "pair_id": "u002251-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002251-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "840e3b38163bee04", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a16", "a19", "a2", "a20", "a9"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u002251-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena is not merged. Quartz is not obsolete. Talc is minified. Talc is fuzzed. Quartz is not benchmarked. Talc is localized. Talc is not notarized. Talc has a feature toggle. Pumice is tagged. Talc is not tagged. Quartz is signed. Galena is not benchmarked. Talc is not obsolete. Galena has a feature toggle. Talc is documented. Galena is not documented. Talc is signed. Pumice is not benchmarked. Quartz is not tagged. Talc is tested. Pumice is minified. Quartz is not tested.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is not backported, and is documented, and is not tagged, that build is not compiled. Item B. When the build is not reverted, and is minified, and is obsolete, that build is versioned. Item C. When the build has a feature toggle, and is obsolete, that build has a changelog. Item D. When the build is not notarized, and is fuzzed, that build is not linted. Item E. When the build has a feature toggle, and is not merged, and is not signed, that build is reverted. Item F. When the build has a feature toggle, and is not obsolete, and is tested, that build is backported. Item G. When the build has a feature toggle, and is not localized, that build is experimental. Item H. When the build has a feature toggle, and is merged, that build has a security advisory. Item I. When the build has a feature toggle, and is localized, and is benchmarked, that build is flaky. Question: What applies to Talc?", "options": ["is flaky", "has a changelog", "has a security advisory", "is experimental", "is reverted", "is backported"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is backported", "unit_id": "u002251", "pair_id": "u002251-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002251-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "fdd2e94f0538155d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a16", "a19", "a2", "a20", "a9"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u002251-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena is not merged. Quartz is not obsolete. Talc is minified. Talc is not fuzzed. Quartz is not benchmarked. Talc is localized. Talc is not notarized. Talc has a feature toggle. Pumice is tagged. Talc is not tagged. Quartz is signed. Galena is not benchmarked. Talc is not obsolete. Galena has a feature toggle. Talc is documented. Galena is not documented. Talc is signed. Pumice is not benchmarked. Quartz is not tagged. Talc is tested. Pumice is minified. Quartz is not tested.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is not backported, and is documented, and is not tagged, that build is not compiled. Item B. When the build is not reverted, and is minified, and is obsolete, that build is versioned. Item C. When the build has a feature toggle, and is obsolete, that build has a changelog. Item D. When the build is not notarized, and is fuzzed, that build is not linted. Item E. When the build has a feature toggle, and is not merged, and is not signed, that build is reverted. Item F. When the build has a feature toggle, and is not obsolete, and is tested, that build is backported. Item G. When the build has a feature toggle, and is not localized, that build is experimental. Item H. When the build has a feature toggle, and is merged, that build has a security advisory. Item I. When the build has a feature toggle, and is localized, and is benchmarked, that build is flaky. Question: What applies to Talc?", "options": ["is flaky", "has a changelog", "has a security advisory", "is experimental", "is reverted", "is backported"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is backported", "unit_id": "u002251", "pair_id": "u002251-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002251-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "840e3b38163bee04", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a16", "a19", "a2", "a20", "a9"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u002316-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is localized. Gneiss is not localized. Zircon has no feature toggle. Zircon is not documented.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a security advisory, thus it is not signed. Provision 2: when the build here is reverted, thus it is signed. Provision 3: when the build here is backported, thus it is reverted. Provision 4: when the build here is not localized, thus it is versioned. Provision 5: when the build here is versioned, thus it has a security advisory. Provision 6: when the build here is documented, thus it is backported. Provision 7: when the build here is not linted, thus it is merged. Provision 8: when the build here is not documented, thus it is notarized. Provision 9: when the build here has no feature toggle, thus it is not flaky. Question: Would it be right to say that Zircon is signed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002316", "pair_id": "u002316-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002316-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "93608b4c435fd1fc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002316-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is localized. Gneiss is not localized. Zircon has no feature toggle. Zircon is not documented.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a security advisory, thus it is not signed. Provision 2: when the build here is reverted, thus it is signed. Provision 3: when the build here is backported, thus it is reverted. Provision 4: when the build here is localized, thus it is versioned. Provision 5: when the build here is versioned, thus it has a security advisory. Provision 6: when the build here is documented, thus it is backported. Provision 7: when the build here is not linted, thus it is merged. Provision 8: when the build here is not documented, thus it is notarized. Provision 9: when the build here has no feature toggle, thus it is not flaky. Question: Would it be right to say that Zircon is signed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002316", "pair_id": "u002316-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002316-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "12cf6678c5dd1834", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002318-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has a premium band of 20. Yara has a claim frequency of 43. Yara has an adjuster. Edda has a payout ceiling of 67. Yara has a payout ceiling of 80. Yara is not subrogated. Edda has a claim frequency of 51.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is uninsurable provided that it has an adjuster. Section 2: a policyholder is a smoker provided that it has a payout ceiling exceeding 71. Section 3: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it has a claim frequency exceeding 75. Section 4: a policyholder is not a smoker provided that it has a payout ceiling exceeding 71. Section 5: a policyholder has a rider provided that it is subrogated. Section 4 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium band lower than 34. Section 5 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium band exceeding 64. Section 4 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium band of 20 or lower. Section 1 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium band of 49 or lower. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium band exceeding 20. Question: Yara is a smoker. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002318", "pair_id": "u002318-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002318-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "006de258cd98c3b9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u002318-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has a premium band of 69. Yara has a claim frequency of 43. Yara has an adjuster. Edda has a payout ceiling of 67. Yara has a payout ceiling of 80. Yara is not subrogated. Edda has a claim frequency of 51.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is uninsurable provided that it has an adjuster. Section 2: a policyholder is a smoker provided that it has a payout ceiling exceeding 71. Section 3: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it has a claim frequency exceeding 75. Section 4: a policyholder is not a smoker provided that it has a payout ceiling exceeding 71. Section 5: a policyholder has a rider provided that it is subrogated. Section 4 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium band lower than 34. Section 5 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium band exceeding 64. Section 4 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium band of 20 or lower. Section 1 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium band of 49 or lower. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium band exceeding 20. Question: Yara is a smoker. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002318", "pair_id": "u002318-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002318-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5d3f0e002f4d1012", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u002352-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata has roadside assistance. Agata is litigated. Agata is not inspected. Agata is a claimant. Bruno has a deductible waiver. Bruno is reinstated. Agata is not grandfathered. Agata has flood coverage. Agata is covered. Bruno is covered. Bruno has no dashcam. Bruno is not grandfathered. Bruno has no roadside assistance. Bruno is litigated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is not inspected plus is a claimant plus has flood coverage: then it has a premium discount. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has a beneficiary plus is not covered plus has a deductible waiver: then it is not reimbursed. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is reinstated: then it is retired. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam plus is grandfathered: then it is not bundled. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam: then it is not retired. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder has roadside assistance: then it has a beneficiary. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder has a beneficiary plus is covered: then it is reimbursed. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder has no deductible waiver plus is inspected plus is not litigated: then it has no beneficiary. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VII. Question: Is it so that Agata is reimbursed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002352", "pair_id": "u002352-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002352-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "14f76ff97358a6d5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002352-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata has roadside assistance. Agata is reinstated. Agata is litigated. Agata is not inspected. Agata is a claimant. Bruno has a deductible waiver. Bruno is reinstated. Agata is not grandfathered. Agata has flood coverage. Agata is covered. Bruno is covered. Bruno has no dashcam. Bruno is not grandfathered. Bruno has no roadside assistance. Bruno is litigated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is not inspected plus is a claimant plus has flood coverage: then it has a premium discount. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has a beneficiary plus is not covered plus has a deductible waiver: then it is not reimbursed. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is reinstated: then it is retired. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam plus is grandfathered: then it is not bundled. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam: then it is not retired. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder has roadside assistance: then it has a beneficiary. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder has a beneficiary plus is covered: then it is reimbursed. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder has no deductible waiver plus is inspected plus is not litigated: then it has no beneficiary. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VII. Question: Is it so that Agata is reimbursed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002352", "pair_id": "u002352-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002352-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3b86b32411e6159d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002391-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not uninsurable. Viggo is not a smoker. Agata is not a claimant. Viggo is covered. Agata is a smoker.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is not covered: then it has an adjuster. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is not uninsurable: then it has flood coverage. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has flood coverage plus is a smoker plus is not uninsurable: then it has no premium discount. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has flood coverage plus is not a smoker: then it has a premium discount. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is not a claimant: then it has a rider. Question: Is it so that Agata has a premium discount?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002391", "pair_id": "u002391-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002391-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "aabb1c14c10b97d5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002391-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not uninsurable. Viggo is not a smoker. Agata is not a claimant. Viggo is covered. Agata is a smoker.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is not covered: then it has an adjuster. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is not uninsurable: then it has flood coverage. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has flood coverage plus is a smoker plus is not uninsurable: then it has no premium discount. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has flood coverage plus is not a smoker: then it has a premium discount. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is a claimant: then it has a rider. Question: Is it so that Agata has a premium discount?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002391", "pair_id": "u002391-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002391-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "236b41ea3b53dd3d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002391-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not uninsurable. Viggo is not a smoker. Agata is not a claimant. Viggo is covered. Agata is a smoker.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is not covered, it then has an adjuster. #2 Each time a policyholder is not uninsurable, it then has flood coverage. #3 Each time a policyholder has flood coverage and additionally is a smoker and additionally is not uninsurable, it then has no premium discount. #4 Each time a policyholder has flood coverage and additionally is not a smoker, it then has a premium discount. #5 Each time a policyholder is not a claimant, it then has a rider. Question: Do the terms above show that Agata has a premium discount?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002391", "pair_id": "u002391-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002391-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "aabb1c14c10b97d5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002391-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not uninsurable. Viggo is not a smoker. Agata is not a claimant. Viggo is covered. Agata is a smoker.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is not covered, it then has an adjuster. #2 Each time a policyholder is not uninsurable, it then has flood coverage. #3 Each time a policyholder has flood coverage and additionally is a smoker and additionally is not uninsurable, it then has no premium discount. #4 Each time a policyholder has flood coverage and additionally is not a smoker, it then has a premium discount. #5 Each time a policyholder is a claimant, it then has a rider. Question: Do the terms above show that Agata has a premium discount?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002391", "pair_id": "u002391-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002391-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "236b41ea3b53dd3d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002397-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not foreclosed. Bastien has no lien. Bastien has a cosigner.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it has a cosigner. Section 2: a borrower is refinanced provided that it is prequalified. Section 3: a borrower has no collateral provided that it has a lien. Section 4: a borrower has collateral provided that it has no lien. Section 5: a borrower is vetted provided that it is prequalified. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it is foreclosed. Section 4 lapses for a borrower if it is foreclosed. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it has no cosigner. Section 4 lapses for a borrower if it is not foreclosed. Question: Bastien has collateral. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002397", "pair_id": "u002397-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002397-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2f42b4998b23b594", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002397-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not foreclosed. Bastien has no lien. Bastien has a cosigner.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it has a cosigner. Section 2: a borrower is refinanced provided that it is prequalified. Section 3: a borrower has no collateral provided that it has no lien. Section 4: a borrower has collateral provided that it has no lien. Section 5: a borrower is vetted provided that it is prequalified. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it is foreclosed. Section 4 lapses for a borrower if it is foreclosed. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it has no cosigner. Section 4 lapses for a borrower if it is not foreclosed. Question: Bastien has collateral. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002397", "pair_id": "u002397-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002397-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fc8e0cd7e7816d47", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002417-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is shortlisted. Hadar is embargoed. Hadar is a pilot study. Nashira is embargoed. Gemma is not a pilot study. Gemma is shortlisted. Hadar has ethics clearance. Nashira has ethics clearance. Hadar is not resubmitted. Hadar is cofunded. Gemma has no ethics clearance. Nashira is not resubmitted. Hadar is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is shortlisted while has ethics clearance, thus it has no seed funding. Provision 2: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is theoretical. Provision 3: when the proposal here is cofunded while is a pilot study, thus it has a patent filing. Provision 4: when the proposal here is resubmitted, thus it is not translational. Provision 5: when the proposal here is collaborative while is shortlisted, thus it is not longitudinal. Provision 6: when the proposal here is collaborative while is cofunded while is embargoed, thus it is longitudinal. Question: Would it be right to say that Hadar is longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002417", "pair_id": "u002417-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002417-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "bcd61feee0018e8e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002417-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is shortlisted. Hadar is embargoed. Hadar is a pilot study. Nashira is embargoed. Gemma is not a pilot study. Gemma is shortlisted. Hadar has ethics clearance. Nashira has ethics clearance. Hadar is not resubmitted. Hadar is cofunded. Gemma has no ethics clearance. Nashira is not resubmitted. Hadar is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is shortlisted while has ethics clearance, thus it has no seed funding. Provision 2: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is theoretical. Provision 3: when the proposal here is cofunded while is a pilot study, thus it has a patent filing. Provision 4: when the proposal here is resubmitted, thus it is not translational. Provision 5: when the proposal here has a patent filing, thus it is collaborative. Provision 6: when the proposal here is collaborative while is shortlisted, thus it is not longitudinal. Provision 7: when the proposal here is collaborative while is cofunded while is embargoed, thus it is longitudinal. Question: Would it be right to say that Hadar is longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002417", "pair_id": "u002417-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002417-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "ee68534fed7402eb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002417-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is shortlisted. Hadar is embargoed. Hadar is a pilot study. Nashira is embargoed. Gemma is not a pilot study. Gemma is shortlisted. Hadar has ethics clearance. Nashira has ethics clearance. Hadar is not resubmitted. Hadar is cofunded. Gemma has no ethics clearance. Nashira is not resubmitted. Hadar is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is shortlisted and further has ethics clearance, it thereby has no seed funding. Point B. If said proposal is embargoed, it thereby is theoretical. Point C. If said proposal is cofunded and further is a pilot study, it thereby has a patent filing. Point D. If said proposal is resubmitted, it thereby is not translational. Point E. If said proposal is collaborative and further is shortlisted, it thereby is not longitudinal. Point F. If said proposal is collaborative and further is cofunded and further is embargoed, it thereby is longitudinal. Question: Statement: Hadar is longitudinal. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002417", "pair_id": "u002417-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002417-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "bcd61feee0018e8e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002417-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is shortlisted. Hadar is embargoed. Hadar is a pilot study. Nashira is embargoed. Gemma is not a pilot study. Gemma is shortlisted. Hadar has ethics clearance. Nashira has ethics clearance. Hadar is not resubmitted. Hadar is cofunded. Gemma has no ethics clearance. Nashira is not resubmitted. Hadar is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is shortlisted and further has ethics clearance, it thereby has no seed funding. Point B. If said proposal is embargoed, it thereby is theoretical. Point C. If said proposal is cofunded and further is a pilot study, it thereby has a patent filing. Point D. If said proposal is resubmitted, it thereby is not translational. Point E. If said proposal has a patent filing, it thereby is collaborative. Point F. If said proposal is collaborative and further is shortlisted, it thereby is not longitudinal. Point G. If said proposal is collaborative and further is cofunded and further is embargoed, it thereby is longitudinal. Question: Statement: Hadar is longitudinal. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002417", "pair_id": "u002417-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002417-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "ee68534fed7402eb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002469-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Corin has a debt ratio of 18. Folke has a debt ratio of 65. Corin is garnished. Corin is solvent. Folke is not solvent.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower has a repayment grade above 72, then it is not a depositor. (2) If a borrower is not solvent, then it is not underwritten. (3) If a borrower is a depositor, then it has an escrow account. (4) If a borrower has a cosigner, then it is a depositor. (5) If a borrower has a debt ratio above 18, then it has a cosigner. (6) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it is pensioned. (7) If a borrower is not solvent, then it has no mortgage. (8) If a borrower is underwritten, then it has a mortgage. (9) If a borrower has a debt ratio of at most 18, then it is underwritten. (10) If a borrower is garnished, then it is not prequalified. (11) If a borrower has a repayment grade above 42, then it is prequalified. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. When (9) and (2) clash, (9) prevails. When (10) and (11) clash, (10) prevails. When (4) and (1) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Corin?", "options": ["is pensioned", "has an escrow account"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is pensioned", "unit_id": "u002469", "pair_id": "u002469-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002469-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4408221cf03ec39b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a9"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u002469-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Corin has a debt ratio of 70. Folke has a debt ratio of 65. Corin is garnished. Corin is solvent. Folke is not solvent.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower has a repayment grade above 72, then it is not a depositor. (2) If a borrower is not solvent, then it is not underwritten. (3) If a borrower is a depositor, then it has an escrow account. (4) If a borrower has a cosigner, then it is a depositor. (5) If a borrower has a debt ratio above 18, then it has a cosigner. (6) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it is pensioned. (7) If a borrower is not solvent, then it has no mortgage. (8) If a borrower is underwritten, then it has a mortgage. (9) If a borrower has a debt ratio of at most 18, then it is underwritten. (10) If a borrower is garnished, then it is not prequalified. (11) If a borrower has a repayment grade above 42, then it is prequalified. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. When (9) and (2) clash, (9) prevails. When (10) and (11) clash, (10) prevails. When (4) and (1) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Corin?", "options": ["is pensioned", "has an escrow account"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has an escrow account", "unit_id": "u002469", "pair_id": "u002469-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002469-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0487b5202074665a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a9"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u002483-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke has a credit rating of 36. Wiebke has a risk tier of 81. Wiebke has a repayment grade of 85. Wiebke is not employed. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 77. Wiebke is not underwritten. Wiebke is a depositor. Wiebke is not bankrupt.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is employed, then it is indebted. (2) If a borrower is a depositor and has a debt ratio below 60 and is bankrupt, then it has no collateral. (3) If a borrower is not a depositor and has a debt ratio of at least 60 and has a risk tier above 64, then it has collateral. (4) If a borrower is underwritten and has a repayment grade above 26, then it is garnished. (1) is void if the borrower has a risk tier of at least 37. (2) is void if the borrower has a risk tier below 45 and is a depositor. (3) is void if the borrower has a repayment grade below 63 and has a credit rating of at most 17. Question: Is it true that Wiebke has collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002483", "pair_id": "u002483-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002483-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "72793c3fd0ec9be9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002483-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke has a credit rating of 36. Wiebke has a risk tier of 81. Wiebke has a repayment grade of 85. Wiebke is not employed. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 77. Wiebke is not underwritten. Wiebke is a depositor. Wiebke is not bankrupt.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is employed, then it is indebted. (2) If a borrower is a depositor and has a debt ratio below 60 and is bankrupt, then it has no collateral. (3) If a borrower is a depositor and has a debt ratio of at least 60 and has a risk tier above 64, then it has collateral. (4) If a borrower is underwritten and has a repayment grade above 26, then it is garnished. (1) is void if the borrower has a risk tier of at least 37. (2) is void if the borrower has a risk tier below 45 and is a depositor. (3) is void if the borrower has a repayment grade below 63 and has a credit rating of at most 17. Question: Is it true that Wiebke has collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002483", "pair_id": "u002483-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002483-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "78fb75a7fea8e38d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002483-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke has a credit rating of 36. Wiebke has a risk tier of 81. Wiebke has a repayment grade of 85. Wiebke is not employed. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 77. Wiebke is not underwritten. Wiebke is a depositor. Wiebke is not bankrupt.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is employed, that borrower is indebted. Item B. When the borrower is a depositor, and has a debt ratio of less than 60, and is bankrupt, that borrower has no collateral. Item C. When the borrower is not a depositor, and has a debt ratio of no less than 60, and has a risk tier of more than 64, that borrower has collateral. Item D. When the borrower is underwritten, and has a repayment grade of more than 26, that borrower is garnished. Item A is suspended when the borrower has a risk tier of no less than 37. Item B is suspended when the borrower has a risk tier of less than 45, and is a depositor. Item C is suspended when the borrower has a repayment grade of less than 63, and has a credit rating of no more than 17. Question: Can one infer that Wiebke has collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002483", "pair_id": "u002483-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002483-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "72793c3fd0ec9be9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002483-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke has a credit rating of 36. Wiebke has a risk tier of 81. Wiebke has a repayment grade of 85. Wiebke is not employed. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 77. Wiebke is not underwritten. Wiebke is a depositor. Wiebke is not bankrupt.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is employed, that borrower is indebted. Item B. When the borrower is a depositor, and has a debt ratio of less than 60, and is bankrupt, that borrower has no collateral. Item C. When the borrower is a depositor, and has a debt ratio of no less than 60, and has a risk tier of more than 64, that borrower has collateral. Item D. When the borrower is underwritten, and has a repayment grade of more than 26, that borrower is garnished. Item A is suspended when the borrower has a risk tier of no less than 37. Item B is suspended when the borrower has a risk tier of less than 45, and is a depositor. Item C is suspended when the borrower has a repayment grade of less than 63, and has a credit rating of no more than 17. Question: Can one infer that Wiebke has collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002483", "pair_id": "u002483-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002483-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "78fb75a7fea8e38d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002499-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara has a premium band of 63. Dmitri is not subrogated. Yara is not grandfathered. Yara is subrogated. Dmitri has a claim frequency of 45. Dmitri has a premium band of 92. Dmitri is not a claimant.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has an adjuster while has a claim frequency beneath 17, thus it is reinstated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a premium band at or above 31, thus it has a rider. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has an adjuster while has a claim frequency at or above 17 while is appraised, thus it is litigated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has an adjuster while is subrogated, thus it is lapsed. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a rider, thus it has an adjuster. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it is bundled. Provision 7: when the policyholder here has a claim frequency beyond 56 while is not subrogated while is not a claimant, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 8: when the policyholder here has an adjuster while is not subrogated while is not grandfathered, thus it is indemnified. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has an adjuster while has a peril factor at or below 69 while is not a claimant, thus it has a beneficiary. Question: Which one describes Yara?", "options": ["is litigated", "has a beneficiary", "is lapsed", "is reinstated", "is indemnified"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is lapsed", "unit_id": "u002499", "pair_id": "u002499-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002499-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "f2b2ea892d14b428", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a9", "a16", "a11", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u002499-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara has a premium band of 63. Dmitri is not subrogated. Yara is not grandfathered. Yara is not subrogated. Dmitri has a claim frequency of 45. Dmitri has a premium band of 92. Dmitri is not a claimant.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has an adjuster while has a claim frequency beneath 17, thus it is reinstated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a premium band at or above 31, thus it has a rider. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has an adjuster while has a claim frequency at or above 17 while is appraised, thus it is litigated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has an adjuster while is subrogated, thus it is lapsed. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a rider, thus it has an adjuster. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it is bundled. Provision 7: when the policyholder here has a claim frequency beyond 56 while is not subrogated while is not a claimant, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 8: when the policyholder here has an adjuster while is not subrogated while is not grandfathered, thus it is indemnified. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has an adjuster while has a peril factor at or below 69 while is not a claimant, thus it has a beneficiary. Question: Which one describes Yara?", "options": ["is litigated", "has a beneficiary", "is lapsed", "is reinstated", "is indemnified"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is indemnified", "unit_id": "u002499", "pair_id": "u002499-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002499-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "eb231ad7c8aa2b9c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a9", "a16", "a11", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u002512-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has no postdoc. Capella is not theoretical. Capella has a team size of 20. Capella has a field site.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a field site, then it is not interdisciplinary. (2) If a proposal has seed funding, then it has ethics clearance. (3) If a proposal has no postdoc, then it has seed funding. (4) If a proposal has a field site, then it is preregistered. (5) If a proposal has ethics clearance, then it has a steering committee. (6) If a proposal has ethics clearance, then it has no steering committee. (6) is void if the proposal has a team size below 78. (5) is void if the proposal is theoretical. (6) is void if the proposal is not theoretical. Question: Is it true that Capella has no steering committee?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002512", "pair_id": "u002512-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002512-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "dc4f23710c488dd3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002512-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has no postdoc. Capella is not theoretical. Capella has a team size of 20. Capella has a field site.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a field site, then it is not interdisciplinary. (2) If a proposal has seed funding, then it has ethics clearance. (3) If a proposal has a postdoc, then it has seed funding. (4) If a proposal has a field site, then it is preregistered. (5) If a proposal has ethics clearance, then it has a steering committee. (6) If a proposal has ethics clearance, then it has no steering committee. (6) is void if the proposal has a team size below 78. (5) is void if the proposal is theoretical. (6) is void if the proposal is not theoretical. Question: Is it true that Capella has no steering committee?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002512", "pair_id": "u002512-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002512-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5dd6cd3da6630266", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002512-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has no postdoc. Capella is not theoretical. Capella has a team size of 20. Capella has a field site.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has a field site, it also is not interdisciplinary. Clause 2: once any proposal has seed funding, it also has ethics clearance. Clause 3: once any proposal has no postdoc, it also has seed funding. Clause 4: once any proposal has a field site, it also is preregistered. Clause 5: once any proposal has ethics clearance, it also has a steering committee. Clause 6: once any proposal has ethics clearance, it also has no steering committee. Clause 6 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a team size under 78. Clause 5 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is theoretical. Clause 6 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not theoretical. Question: Does it follow that Capella has no steering committee?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002512", "pair_id": "u002512-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002512-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "dc4f23710c488dd3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002512-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has no postdoc. Capella is not theoretical. Capella has a team size of 20. Capella has a field site.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has a field site, it also is not interdisciplinary. Clause 2: once any proposal has seed funding, it also has ethics clearance. Clause 3: once any proposal has a postdoc, it also has seed funding. Clause 4: once any proposal has a field site, it also is preregistered. Clause 5: once any proposal has ethics clearance, it also has a steering committee. Clause 6: once any proposal has ethics clearance, it also has no steering committee. Clause 6 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a team size under 78. Clause 5 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is theoretical. Clause 6 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not theoretical. Question: Does it follow that Capella has no steering committee?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002512", "pair_id": "u002512-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002512-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5dd6cd3da6630266", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002537-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is not anemic. Benedek has a mobility rank of 49. Zora is not anemic. Zora is diabetic. Benedek is not allergic. Zora has a mobility rank of 84.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has no pacemaker provided that it is allergic. Section 2: a patient has no interpreter provided that it is not diabetic. Section 3: a patient is postoperative provided that it is anemic. Section 4: a patient is not postoperative provided that it has a mobility rank of 65 or lower. Section 5: a patient is waitlisted provided that it is diabetic. Question: Zora is postoperative. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002537", "pair_id": "u002537-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002537-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "fdc1778aa31d310d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002537-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is not anemic. Benedek has a mobility rank of 49. Zora is not anemic. Zora is diabetic. Benedek is not allergic. Zora has a mobility rank of 84.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has no pacemaker provided that it is allergic. Section 2: a patient has no interpreter provided that it is diabetic. Section 3: a patient is postoperative provided that it is anemic. Section 4: a patient is not postoperative provided that it has a mobility rank of 65 or lower. Section 5: a patient is waitlisted provided that it is diabetic. Question: Zora is postoperative. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002537", "pair_id": "u002537-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002537-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "ad58ccf18ac531fd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002537-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is not anemic. Benedek has a mobility rank of 49. Zora is not anemic. Zora is diabetic. Benedek is not allergic. Zora has a mobility rank of 84.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is allergic: then it has no pacemaker. Policy II. Suppose that patient is not diabetic: then it has no interpreter. Policy III. Suppose that patient is anemic: then it is postoperative. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a mobility rank no higher than 65: then it is not postoperative. Policy V. Suppose that patient is diabetic: then it is waitlisted. Question: Is it so that Zora is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002537", "pair_id": "u002537-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002537-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "fdc1778aa31d310d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002537-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is not anemic. Benedek has a mobility rank of 49. Zora is not anemic. Zora is diabetic. Benedek is not allergic. Zora has a mobility rank of 84.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is allergic: then it has no pacemaker. Policy II. Suppose that patient is diabetic: then it has no interpreter. Policy III. Suppose that patient is anemic: then it is postoperative. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a mobility rank no higher than 65: then it is not postoperative. Policy V. Suppose that patient is diabetic: then it is waitlisted. Question: Is it so that Zora is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002537", "pair_id": "u002537-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002537-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "ad58ccf18ac531fd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002566-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not solvent. Bastien is audited. Greta is delinquent. Hamid is not solvent. Wiebke is solvent. Bastien is delinquent. Wiebke is a depositor. Greta is a depositor. Bastien is not a depositor.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is not garnished and also is solvent, it also is overdrawn. Clause 2: once any borrower is delinquent, it also is indebted. Clause 3: once any borrower is indebted and also is not a depositor, it also has no lien. Clause 4: once any borrower is indebted and also is a depositor, it also has a lien. Clause 5: once any borrower is not solvent, it also is not employed. Clause 6: once any borrower is not delinquent, it also is not overdrawn. Clause 7: once any borrower is audited, it also is not indebted. Clause 7 overrides Clause 2. Clause 6 overrides Clause 1. Clause 4 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Bastien has a lien?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002566", "pair_id": "u002566-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002566-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7f8ac47edae27590", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u002566-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not solvent. Bastien is audited. Greta is delinquent. Hamid is not solvent. Wiebke is solvent. Bastien is delinquent. Wiebke is a depositor. Greta is a depositor. Bastien is not a depositor.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is not garnished and also is solvent, it also is overdrawn. Clause 2: once any borrower is delinquent, it also is indebted. Clause 3: once any borrower is indebted and also is not a depositor, it also has no lien. Clause 4: once any borrower is indebted and also is a depositor, it also has a lien. Clause 5: once any borrower is solvent, it also is not employed. Clause 6: once any borrower is not delinquent, it also is not overdrawn. Clause 7: once any borrower is audited, it also is not indebted. Clause 7 overrides Clause 2. Clause 6 overrides Clause 1. Clause 4 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Bastien has a lien?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002566", "pair_id": "u002566-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002566-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f60f7e177f97d706", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u002566-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not solvent. Bastien is audited. Greta is delinquent. Hamid is not solvent. Wiebke is solvent. Bastien is delinquent. Wiebke is a depositor. Greta is a depositor. Bastien is not a depositor.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is not garnished, and is solvent, that borrower is overdrawn. Item B. When the borrower is delinquent, that borrower is indebted. Item C. When the borrower is indebted, and is not a depositor, that borrower has no lien. Item D. When the borrower is indebted, and is a depositor, that borrower has a lien. Item E. When the borrower is not solvent, that borrower is not employed. Item F. When the borrower is not delinquent, that borrower is not overdrawn. Item G. When the borrower is audited, that borrower is not indebted. Item G outranks Item B. Item F outranks Item A. Item D outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Bastien has a lien?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002566", "pair_id": "u002566-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002566-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7f8ac47edae27590", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u002566-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not solvent. Bastien is audited. Greta is delinquent. Hamid is not solvent. Wiebke is solvent. Bastien is delinquent. Wiebke is a depositor. Greta is a depositor. Bastien is not a depositor.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is not garnished, and is solvent, that borrower is overdrawn. Item B. When the borrower is delinquent, that borrower is indebted. Item C. When the borrower is indebted, and is not a depositor, that borrower has no lien. Item D. When the borrower is indebted, and is a depositor, that borrower has a lien. Item E. When the borrower is solvent, that borrower is not employed. Item F. When the borrower is not delinquent, that borrower is not overdrawn. Item G. When the borrower is audited, that borrower is not indebted. Item G outranks Item B. Item F outranks Item A. Item D outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Bastien has a lien?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002566", "pair_id": "u002566-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002566-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f60f7e177f97d706", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u002581-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is obsolete. Talc is not obsolete. Talc is not fuzzed. Shale has a migration script. Talc has a test yield of 44. Talc has a migration script. Talc is not reproducible.", "instruction": "(1) If a build has a test yield of at least 37, then it is tagged. (2) If a build is fuzzed, then it has no feature toggle. (3) If a build has a patch cycle of at most 33, then it has a security advisory. (4) If a build has a patch cycle above 33, then it is tested. (5) If a build has a migration script, then it is reverted. (6) If a build is obsolete, then it is localized. (7) If a build is fuzzed, then it is merged. (8) If a build has a lint backlog below 50, then it is notarized. (9) If a build has a lint backlog above 76, then it has a changelog. (10) If a build has a defect tally of at least 18, then it is minified. (11) If a build is reproducible, then it is versioned. (2) is void if the build has a test yield above 14. (6) is void if the build is fuzzed. (1) is void if the build is reproducible. Question: Which option holds for Talc?", "options": ["is notarized", "is merged", "is tagged", "is minified", "has a security advisory", "is versioned", "is localized", "is tested"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is tagged", "unit_id": "u002581", "pair_id": "u002581-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002581-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b589a9471385a197", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a17", "a16", "a10", "a4", "a9", "a14", "a6", "a12"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u002581-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is obsolete. Talc is not obsolete. Talc is not fuzzed. Shale has a migration script. Talc has a test yield of 44. Talc has no migration script. Talc is not reproducible.", "instruction": "(1) If a build has a test yield of at least 37, then it is tagged. (2) If a build is fuzzed, then it has no feature toggle. (3) If a build has a patch cycle of at most 33, then it has a security advisory. (4) If a build has a patch cycle above 33, then it is tested. (5) If a build has a migration script, then it is reverted. (6) If a build is obsolete, then it is localized. (7) If a build is fuzzed, then it is merged. (8) If a build has a lint backlog below 50, then it is notarized. (9) If a build has a lint backlog above 76, then it has a changelog. (10) If a build has a defect tally of at least 18, then it is minified. (11) If a build is reproducible, then it is versioned. (2) is void if the build has a test yield above 14. (6) is void if the build is fuzzed. (1) is void if the build is reproducible. Question: Which option holds for Talc?", "options": ["is notarized", "is merged", "is tagged", "is minified", "has a security advisory", "is versioned", "is localized", "is tested"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is tagged", "unit_id": "u002581", "pair_id": "u002581-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002581-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "61143370edae3dae", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a17", "a16", "a10", "a4", "a9", "a14", "a6", "a12"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u002581-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is obsolete. Talc is not obsolete. Talc is not fuzzed. Shale has a migration script. Talc has a test yield of 44. Talc has a migration script. Talc is not reproducible.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a test yield of no less than 37, that build is tagged. Item B. When the build is fuzzed, that build has no feature toggle. Item C. When the build has a patch cycle of no more than 33, that build has a security advisory. Item D. When the build has a patch cycle of more than 33, that build is tested. Item E. When the build has a migration script, that build is reverted. Item F. When the build is obsolete, that build is localized. Item G. When the build is fuzzed, that build is merged. Item H. When the build has a lint backlog of less than 50, that build is notarized. Item I. When the build has a lint backlog of more than 76, that build has a changelog. Item J. When the build has a defect tally of no less than 18, that build is minified. Item K. When the build is reproducible, that build is versioned. Item B is suspended when the build has a test yield of more than 14. Item F is suspended when the build is fuzzed. Item A is suspended when the build is reproducible. Question: What applies to Talc?", "options": ["is notarized", "is merged", "is tagged", "is minified", "has a security advisory", "is versioned", "is localized", "is tested"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is tagged", "unit_id": "u002581", "pair_id": "u002581-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002581-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b589a9471385a197", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a17", "a16", "a10", "a4", "a9", "a14", "a6", "a12"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u002581-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is obsolete. Talc is not obsolete. Talc is not fuzzed. Shale has a migration script. Talc has a test yield of 44. Talc has no migration script. Talc is not reproducible.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a test yield of no less than 37, that build is tagged. Item B. When the build is fuzzed, that build has no feature toggle. Item C. When the build has a patch cycle of no more than 33, that build has a security advisory. Item D. When the build has a patch cycle of more than 33, that build is tested. Item E. When the build has a migration script, that build is reverted. Item F. When the build is obsolete, that build is localized. Item G. When the build is fuzzed, that build is merged. Item H. When the build has a lint backlog of less than 50, that build is notarized. Item I. When the build has a lint backlog of more than 76, that build has a changelog. Item J. When the build has a defect tally of no less than 18, that build is minified. Item K. When the build is reproducible, that build is versioned. Item B is suspended when the build has a test yield of more than 14. Item F is suspended when the build is fuzzed. Item A is suspended when the build is reproducible. Question: What applies to Talc?", "options": ["is notarized", "is merged", "is tagged", "is minified", "has a security advisory", "is versioned", "is localized", "is tested"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is tagged", "unit_id": "u002581", "pair_id": "u002581-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002581-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "61143370edae3dae", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a17", "a16", "a10", "a4", "a9", "a14", "a6", "a12"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u002622-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach has a field site. Fomalhaut has no field site. Fomalhaut is not cofunded. Mirach is collaborative. Nashira has no field site.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is shortlisted provided that it is not endorsed. Section 2: a proposal is not endorsed provided that it has no field site. Section 3: a proposal is not preregistered provided that it has no field site. Section 4: a proposal has a steering committee provided that it is cofunded. Section 5: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it is not collaborative. Section 6: a proposal is not shortlisted provided that it has a steering committee. Section 7: a proposal is not budgeted provided that it is collaborative. Question: Fomalhaut is shortlisted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002622", "pair_id": "u002622-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002622-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "df618b83af2d0ae7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002622-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach has a field site. Fomalhaut has no field site. Fomalhaut is not cofunded. Mirach is collaborative. Nashira has no field site.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is shortlisted provided that it is not endorsed. Section 2: a proposal is not endorsed provided that it has a field site. Section 3: a proposal is not preregistered provided that it has no field site. Section 4: a proposal has a steering committee provided that it is cofunded. Section 5: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it is not collaborative. Section 6: a proposal is not shortlisted provided that it has a steering committee. Section 7: a proposal is not budgeted provided that it is collaborative. Question: Fomalhaut is shortlisted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002622", "pair_id": "u002622-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002622-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "1aa5b70370bc20d0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002622-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach has a field site. Fomalhaut has no field site. Fomalhaut is not cofunded. Mirach is collaborative. Nashira has no field site.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is not endorsed: then it is shortlisted. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has no field site: then it is not endorsed. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has no field site: then it is not preregistered. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is cofunded: then it has a steering committee. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is not collaborative: then it has ethics clearance. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee: then it is not shortlisted. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal is collaborative: then it is not budgeted. Question: Is it so that Fomalhaut is shortlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002622", "pair_id": "u002622-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002622-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "df618b83af2d0ae7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002622-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach has a field site. Fomalhaut has no field site. Fomalhaut is not cofunded. Mirach is collaborative. Nashira has no field site.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is not endorsed: then it is shortlisted. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has a field site: then it is not endorsed. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has no field site: then it is not preregistered. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is cofunded: then it has a steering committee. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is not collaborative: then it has ethics clearance. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee: then it is not shortlisted. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal is collaborative: then it is not budgeted. Question: Is it so that Fomalhaut is shortlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002622", "pair_id": "u002622-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002622-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "1aa5b70370bc20d0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002635-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is lapsed. Celeste is disputed. Celeste has an adjuster. Dmitri is lapsed. Viggo has no adjuster. Celeste has a premium band of 96. Dmitri is not disputed. Dmitri has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a dashcam, thus it is litigated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has an adjuster, thus it is not subrogated. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a premium band beneath 37 while is disputed while is lapsed, thus it is subrogated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has an adjuster, thus it is not litigated. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Celeste has flood coverage?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002635", "pair_id": "u002635-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002635-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6c4e99ed739fe28c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002635-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is lapsed. Celeste is disputed. Celeste has an adjuster. Dmitri is lapsed. Celeste has flood coverage. Viggo has no adjuster. Celeste has a premium band of 96. Dmitri is not disputed. Dmitri has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a dashcam, thus it is litigated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has an adjuster, thus it is not subrogated. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a premium band beneath 37 while is disputed while is lapsed, thus it is subrogated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has an adjuster, thus it is not litigated. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Celeste has flood coverage?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002635", "pair_id": "u002635-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002635-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7fcc17fd23a1eefb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002736-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is not tested. Schist has a patch cycle of 80. Shale is signed. Shale has a patch cycle of 38. Schist is not tested.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is not signed, then it is obsolete. (2) If a build has a patch cycle of at most 12, then it is merged. Question: Is it true that Shale is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002736", "pair_id": "u002736-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002736-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "fcdc9390418598c6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u002736-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is not tested. Schist has a patch cycle of 80. Shale is signed. Shale has a patch cycle of 38. Schist is not tested. Shale is minified.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is not signed, then it is obsolete. (2) If a build has a patch cycle of at most 12, then it is merged. Question: Is it true that Shale is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002736", "pair_id": "u002736-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002736-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "ac17d83153990ccc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u002736-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is not tested. Schist has a patch cycle of 80. Shale is signed. Shale has a patch cycle of 38. Schist is not tested.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is not signed, that build is obsolete. Item B. When the build has a patch cycle of no more than 12, that build is merged. Question: Can one infer that Shale is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002736", "pair_id": "u002736-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002736-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "fcdc9390418598c6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u002736-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is not tested. Schist has a patch cycle of 80. Shale is signed. Shale has a patch cycle of 38. Schist is not tested. Shale is minified.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is not signed, that build is obsolete. Item B. When the build has a patch cycle of no more than 12, that build is merged. Question: Can one infer that Shale is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002736", "pair_id": "u002736-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002736-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "ac17d83153990ccc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u002774-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is registered.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel has a locker slot provided that it is registered. Question: Kaveh is tracked. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002774", "pair_id": "u002774-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002774-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "767c3fc5eff67913", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002774-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not registered.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel has a locker slot provided that it is registered. Question: Kaveh is tracked. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002774", "pair_id": "u002774-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002774-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "d7f006b256104f95", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002782-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not damaged. Ulla is not prepaid. Liesel is damaged. Liesel is prepaid.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is refrigerated, it also is not hazardous. Clause 2: once any parcel is oversized, it also is refrigerated. Clause 3: once any parcel is damaged, it also is sealed. Clause 4: once any parcel has a parcel volume of 24 or more, it also is oversized. Clause 5: once any parcel is fragile, it also is hazardous. Clause 6: once any parcel is prepaid, it also is registered. Clause 7: once any parcel is registered, it also is fragile. Question: Does it follow that Ulla is hazardous?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002782", "pair_id": "u002782-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002782-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "f2d3a07d4a0335b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u002782-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is damaged. Ulla is not prepaid. Liesel is damaged. Liesel is prepaid.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is refrigerated, it also is not hazardous. Clause 2: once any parcel is oversized, it also is refrigerated. Clause 3: once any parcel is damaged, it also is sealed. Clause 4: once any parcel has a parcel volume of 24 or more, it also is oversized. Clause 5: once any parcel is fragile, it also is hazardous. Clause 6: once any parcel is prepaid, it also is registered. Clause 7: once any parcel is registered, it also is fragile. Question: Does it follow that Ulla is hazardous?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002782", "pair_id": "u002782-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002782-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "f6b3db985b42eeab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u002861-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab has industry backing. Electra is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse has a team size of 93. Capella has a team size of 12. Capella is translational. Kochab has a team size of 53. Electra has a team size of 55. Capella has a postdoc. Betelgeuse is translational. Kochab has a review mark of 11. Capella has a review mark of 96. Betelgeuse has a review mark of 91. Electra is not translational. Kochab is translational. Betelgeuse has industry backing. Electra is interdisciplinary. Kochab has a postdoc. Kochab is peer reviewed. Electra has a review mark of 76.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has a team size beneath 71, thus it is multicenter. Provision 2: when the proposal here is multicenter while has a review mark at or below 18 while is peer reviewed, thus it is embargoed. Provision 3: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is a pilot study. Provision 4: when the proposal here is translational, thus it has no field site. Provision 5: when the proposal here is multicenter while has industry backing, thus it has a steering committee. Provision 6: when the proposal here is multicenter while has a review mark at or below 18, thus it is not embargoed. Provision 7: when the proposal here has a postdoc while is interdisciplinary, thus it is not multicenter. Provision 8: when the proposal here has a review mark beyond 23, thus it is not a pilot study. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Kochab is not embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002861", "pair_id": "u002861-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002861-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2a541c5312621bd1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002861-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab has industry backing. Electra is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse has a team size of 93. Capella has a team size of 12. Capella is translational. Kochab has a team size of 53. Electra has a team size of 55. Capella has a postdoc. Betelgeuse is translational. Kochab has a review mark of 11. Capella has a review mark of 96. Betelgeuse has a review mark of 91. Electra is not translational. Kochab is translational. Betelgeuse has industry backing. Electra is interdisciplinary. Kochab has a postdoc. Kochab is peer reviewed. Electra has a review mark of 76.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has a team size beneath 71, thus it is multicenter. Provision 2: when the proposal here is multicenter while has a review mark at or below 18 while is peer reviewed, thus it is embargoed. Provision 3: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is a pilot study. Provision 4: when the proposal here is translational, thus it has no field site. Provision 5: when the proposal here is multicenter while has industry backing, thus it has a steering committee. Provision 6: when the proposal here is multicenter while has a review mark beyond 18, thus it is not embargoed. Provision 7: when the proposal here has a postdoc while is interdisciplinary, thus it is not multicenter. Provision 8: when the proposal here has a review mark beyond 23, thus it is not a pilot study. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Kochab is not embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002861", "pair_id": "u002861-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002861-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5cfee69d792ebdd6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002861-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab has industry backing. Electra is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse has a team size of 93. Capella has a team size of 12. Capella is translational. Kochab has a team size of 53. Electra has a team size of 55. Capella has a postdoc. Betelgeuse is translational. Kochab has a review mark of 11. Capella has a review mark of 96. Betelgeuse has a review mark of 91. Electra is not translational. Kochab is translational. Betelgeuse has industry backing. Electra is interdisciplinary. Kochab has a postdoc. Kochab is peer reviewed. Electra has a review mark of 76.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has a team size short of 71, it thereby is multicenter. Point B. If said proposal is multicenter and further has a review mark of maximum 18 and further is peer reviewed, it thereby is embargoed. Point C. If said proposal is embargoed, it thereby is a pilot study. Point D. If said proposal is translational, it thereby has no field site. Point E. If said proposal is multicenter and further has industry backing, it thereby has a steering committee. Point F. If said proposal is multicenter and further has a review mark of maximum 18, it thereby is not embargoed. Point G. If said proposal has a postdoc and further is interdisciplinary, it thereby is not multicenter. Point H. If said proposal has a review mark in excess of 23, it thereby is not a pilot study. Point C supersedes Point H. Point G supersedes Point A. Point F supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Kochab is not embargoed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002861", "pair_id": "u002861-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002861-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2a541c5312621bd1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002861-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab has industry backing. Electra is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse has a team size of 93. Capella has a team size of 12. Capella is translational. Kochab has a team size of 53. Electra has a team size of 55. Capella has a postdoc. Betelgeuse is translational. Kochab has a review mark of 11. Capella has a review mark of 96. Betelgeuse has a review mark of 91. Electra is not translational. Kochab is translational. Betelgeuse has industry backing. Electra is interdisciplinary. Kochab has a postdoc. Kochab is peer reviewed. Electra has a review mark of 76.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has a team size short of 71, it thereby is multicenter. Point B. If said proposal is multicenter and further has a review mark of maximum 18 and further is peer reviewed, it thereby is embargoed. Point C. If said proposal is embargoed, it thereby is a pilot study. Point D. If said proposal is translational, it thereby has no field site. Point E. If said proposal is multicenter and further has industry backing, it thereby has a steering committee. Point F. If said proposal is multicenter and further has a review mark in excess of 18, it thereby is not embargoed. Point G. If said proposal has a postdoc and further is interdisciplinary, it thereby is not multicenter. Point H. If said proposal has a review mark in excess of 23, it thereby is not a pilot study. Point C supersedes Point H. Point G supersedes Point A. Point F supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Kochab is not embargoed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002861", "pair_id": "u002861-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002861-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5cfee69d792ebdd6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002889-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny has a debt ratio of 3. Wiebke is refinanced. Ilse is overdrawn. Tomas is not pensioned. Dagny is overdrawn. Wiebke is not overdrawn. Ilse is refinanced. Tomas is overdrawn. Tomas has a debt ratio of 72. Dagny is pensioned. Wiebke is pensioned. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 86. Tomas is refinanced.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is overdrawn and has a debt ratio above 65, then it is foreclosed. (2) If a borrower is pensioned and has a debt ratio of at most 86 and is refinanced, then it has no lien. (3) If a borrower is pensioned and is not refinanced, then it has a lien. Question: Is it true that Wiebke has a lien?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002889", "pair_id": "u002889-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002889-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "4e6ee803eca36055", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u002889-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny has a debt ratio of 3. Wiebke is not refinanced. Ilse is overdrawn. Tomas is not pensioned. Dagny is overdrawn. Wiebke is not overdrawn. Ilse is refinanced. Tomas is overdrawn. Tomas has a debt ratio of 72. Dagny is pensioned. Wiebke is pensioned. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 86. Tomas is refinanced.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is overdrawn and has a debt ratio above 65, then it is foreclosed. (2) If a borrower is pensioned and has a debt ratio of at most 86 and is refinanced, then it has no lien. (3) If a borrower is pensioned and is not refinanced, then it has a lien. Question: Is it true that Wiebke has a lien?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002889", "pair_id": "u002889-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002889-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e7211be535b691bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u002889-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny has a debt ratio of 3. Wiebke is refinanced. Ilse is overdrawn. Tomas is not pensioned. Dagny is overdrawn. Wiebke is not overdrawn. Ilse is refinanced. Tomas is overdrawn. Tomas has a debt ratio of 72. Dagny is pensioned. Wiebke is pensioned. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 86. Tomas is refinanced.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is overdrawn and also has a debt ratio over 65, it also is foreclosed. Clause 2: once any borrower is pensioned and also has a debt ratio of 86 or less and also is refinanced, it also has no lien. Clause 3: once any borrower is pensioned and also is not refinanced, it also has a lien. Question: Does it follow that Wiebke has a lien?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002889", "pair_id": "u002889-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002889-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "4e6ee803eca36055", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u002889-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny has a debt ratio of 3. Wiebke is not refinanced. Ilse is overdrawn. Tomas is not pensioned. Dagny is overdrawn. Wiebke is not overdrawn. Ilse is refinanced. Tomas is overdrawn. Tomas has a debt ratio of 72. Dagny is pensioned. Wiebke is pensioned. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 86. Tomas is refinanced.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is overdrawn and also has a debt ratio over 65, it also is foreclosed. Clause 2: once any borrower is pensioned and also has a debt ratio of 86 or less and also is refinanced, it also has no lien. Clause 3: once any borrower is pensioned and also is not refinanced, it also has a lien. Question: Does it follow that Wiebke has a lien?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002889", "pair_id": "u002889-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002889-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e7211be535b691bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u002916-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra has a seniority step of 37. Teodor is not freelance. Teodor has a seniority step of 92. Petra is not a veteran. Teodor has a mentor. Hedda is freelance. Teodor is a veteran. Hedda is not a veteran. Petra is probationary.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not certified provided that it has a seniority step of 38 or higher. Section 2: a candidate is not sponsored provided that it has an aptitude quotient lower than 74. Section 3: a candidate has a signing bonus provided that it is sponsored. Section 4: a candidate is recommended provided that it is freelance. Section 5: a candidate is not seasoned provided that it is a veteran. Section 6: a candidate is unionized provided that it is a veteran. Section 7: a candidate has a portfolio provided that it has a background screening. Section 8: a candidate is relocating provided that it is seasoned. Section 9: a candidate is seasoned provided that it is a graduate. Section 10: a candidate is not recommended provided that it has a seniority step exceeding 72. Section 11: a candidate is a graduate provided that it has a seniority step exceeding 79. Section 12: a candidate is certified provided that it is probationary. Section 13: a candidate has a background screening provided that it is unionized. Section 14: a candidate is not relocating provided that it is unionized. Section 15: a candidate is sponsored provided that it is certified. Section 14 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 12 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 15 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Which statement fits Teodor?", "options": ["has a portfolio", "is relocating", "has a signing bonus"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a portfolio", "unit_id": "u002916", "pair_id": "u002916-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002916-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a8eee38aa85ea35f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a3", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002916-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra has a seniority step of 37. Teodor is not freelance. Teodor has a seniority step of 92. Petra is not a veteran. Teodor has a mentor. Teodor has an aptitude quotient of 38. Hedda is freelance. Teodor is a veteran. Hedda is not a veteran. Petra is probationary.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not certified provided that it has a seniority step of 38 or higher. Section 2: a candidate is not sponsored provided that it has an aptitude quotient lower than 74. Section 3: a candidate has a signing bonus provided that it is sponsored. Section 4: a candidate is recommended provided that it is freelance. Section 5: a candidate is not seasoned provided that it is a veteran. Section 6: a candidate is unionized provided that it is a veteran. Section 7: a candidate has a portfolio provided that it has a background screening. Section 8: a candidate is relocating provided that it is seasoned. Section 9: a candidate is seasoned provided that it is a graduate. Section 10: a candidate is not recommended provided that it has a seniority step exceeding 72. Section 11: a candidate is a graduate provided that it has a seniority step exceeding 79. Section 12: a candidate is certified provided that it is probationary. Section 13: a candidate has a background screening provided that it is unionized. Section 14: a candidate is not relocating provided that it is unionized. Section 15: a candidate is sponsored provided that it is certified. Section 14 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 12 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 15 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Which statement fits Teodor?", "options": ["has a portfolio", "is relocating", "has a signing bonus"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a portfolio", "unit_id": "u002916", "pair_id": "u002916-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002916-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4f65cb5ad7684d69", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a3", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002916-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra has a seniority step of 37. Teodor is not freelance. Teodor has a seniority step of 92. Petra is not a veteran. Teodor has a mentor. Hedda is freelance. Teodor is a veteran. Hedda is not a veteran. Petra is probationary.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step no lower than 38: then it is not certified. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has an aptitude quotient smaller than 74: then it is not sponsored. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is sponsored: then it has a signing bonus. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is freelance: then it is recommended. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is a veteran: then it is not seasoned. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is a veteran: then it is unionized. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate has a background screening: then it has a portfolio. Policy VIII. Suppose that candidate is seasoned: then it is relocating. Policy IX. Suppose that candidate is a graduate: then it is seasoned. Policy X. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step higher than 72: then it is not recommended. Policy XI. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step higher than 79: then it is a graduate. Policy XII. Suppose that candidate is probationary: then it is certified. Policy XIII. Suppose that candidate is unionized: then it has a background screening. Policy XIV. Suppose that candidate is unionized: then it is not relocating. Policy XV. Suppose that candidate is certified: then it is sponsored. In a clash, Policy XIV beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy XII beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy XV beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy IV. Question: Which choice is right for Teodor?", "options": ["has a portfolio", "is relocating", "has a signing bonus"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a portfolio", "unit_id": "u002916", "pair_id": "u002916-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002916-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a8eee38aa85ea35f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a3", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002916-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra has a seniority step of 37. Teodor is not freelance. Teodor has a seniority step of 92. Petra is not a veteran. Teodor has a mentor. Teodor has an aptitude quotient of 38. Hedda is freelance. Teodor is a veteran. Hedda is not a veteran. Petra is probationary.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step no lower than 38: then it is not certified. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has an aptitude quotient smaller than 74: then it is not sponsored. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is sponsored: then it has a signing bonus. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is freelance: then it is recommended. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is a veteran: then it is not seasoned. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is a veteran: then it is unionized. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate has a background screening: then it has a portfolio. Policy VIII. Suppose that candidate is seasoned: then it is relocating. Policy IX. Suppose that candidate is a graduate: then it is seasoned. Policy X. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step higher than 72: then it is not recommended. Policy XI. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step higher than 79: then it is a graduate. Policy XII. Suppose that candidate is probationary: then it is certified. Policy XIII. Suppose that candidate is unionized: then it has a background screening. Policy XIV. Suppose that candidate is unionized: then it is not relocating. Policy XV. Suppose that candidate is certified: then it is sponsored. In a clash, Policy XIV beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy XII beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy XV beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy IV. Question: Which choice is right for Teodor?", "options": ["has a portfolio", "is relocating", "has a signing bonus"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a portfolio", "unit_id": "u002916", "pair_id": "u002916-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002916-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4f65cb5ad7684d69", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a3", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002920-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno has no snapshot. Juno has a latency budget of 81. Orrery has a latency budget of 89. Juno has no dedicated host. Orrery has a snapshot. Juno is stateless. Sierra has a snapshot.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is provisioned provided that it has a latency budget of 16 or lower. Section 2: a workload is not provisioned provided that it has a snapshot. Section 3: a workload is sandboxed provided that it has a dedicated host. Section 4: a workload is not sandboxed provided that it is stateless. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Orrery is provisioned. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002920", "pair_id": "u002920-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002920-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "179e831c990156be", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002920-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is stateless. Juno has no snapshot. Juno has a latency budget of 81. Orrery has a latency budget of 89. Juno has no dedicated host. Orrery has a snapshot. Juno is stateless. Sierra has a snapshot.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is provisioned provided that it has a latency budget of 16 or lower. Section 2: a workload is not provisioned provided that it has a snapshot. Section 3: a workload is sandboxed provided that it has a dedicated host. Section 4: a workload is not sandboxed provided that it is stateless. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Orrery is provisioned. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002920", "pair_id": "u002920-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002920-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "76dd40128af2e90e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u002933-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Talc has a changelog. Zircon is localized. Talc is signed. Zircon is versioned. Talc is not compiled. Talc is not versioned. Basalt has a changelog. Galena has no changelog. Galena is signed. Galena is not localized. Zircon is not signed. Basalt is fuzzed. Galena is not fuzzed. Talc is fuzzed. Zircon is documented. Zircon is obsolete. Zircon is fuzzed. Zircon has a changelog.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is experimental. Policy II. Suppose that build is versioned: then it is notarized. Policy III. Suppose that build is compiled: then it is not linted. Policy IV. Suppose that build is documented: then it is not notarized. Policy V. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it has a migration script. Policy VI. Suppose that build is localized: then it has a feature toggle. Policy VII. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is not reproducible. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is signed: then it is linted. Policy IX. Suppose that build is compiled: then it is reverted. Policy II is waived if that build is signed. Policy III is waived if that build is obsolete. Policy VI is waived if that build is versioned. Policy I is waived if that build is fuzzed. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. Question: Which choice is right for Basalt?", "options": ["has a migration script", "is notarized", "has a feature toggle", "is experimental"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a migration script", "unit_id": "u002933", "pair_id": "u002933-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/14", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002933-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f41d0e5a7d189a61", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a14", "a5", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002933-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Talc has a changelog. Zircon is localized. Talc is signed. Zircon is versioned. Talc is not compiled. Talc is not versioned. Basalt has a changelog. Galena has no changelog. Galena is signed. Galena is not localized. Zircon is not signed. Basalt is fuzzed. Galena is not fuzzed. Talc is fuzzed. Basalt is compiled. Zircon is documented. Zircon is obsolete. Zircon is fuzzed. Zircon has a changelog.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is experimental. Policy II. Suppose that build is versioned: then it is notarized. Policy III. Suppose that build is compiled: then it is not linted. Policy IV. Suppose that build is documented: then it is not notarized. Policy V. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it has a migration script. Policy VI. Suppose that build is localized: then it has a feature toggle. Policy VII. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is not reproducible. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is signed: then it is linted. Policy IX. Suppose that build is compiled: then it is reverted. Policy II is waived if that build is signed. Policy III is waived if that build is obsolete. Policy VI is waived if that build is versioned. Policy I is waived if that build is fuzzed. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. Question: Which choice is right for Basalt?", "options": ["has a migration script", "is notarized", "has a feature toggle", "is experimental"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a migration script", "unit_id": "u002933", "pair_id": "u002933-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/14", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002933-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bacd536bc47de25d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a14", "a5", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u002935-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is not cofunded. Izar is not budgeted. Izar is multicenter. Izar is endorsed. Izar has no patent filing. Izar is not translational. Izar has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is shortlisted, then it is peer reviewed. (2) If a proposal is translational, then it is not collaborative. (3) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is not a pilot study. (4) If a proposal is resubmitted, then it is not peer reviewed. (5) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is resubmitted. (6) If a proposal is peer reviewed and is endorsed, then it has a steering committee. (7) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is renewed. (8) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is collaborative. (9) If a proposal is cofunded and is budgeted, then it is not shortlisted. (10) If a proposal is shortlisted, then it is a pilot study. (11) If a proposal is peer reviewed and has ethics clearance and is budgeted, then it has no steering committee. (12) If a proposal has no patent filing, then it is shortlisted. (5) is void if the proposal is endorsed. When (1) and (4) clash, (1) prevails. When (10) and (3) clash, (10) prevails. When (2) and (8) clash, (2) prevails. When (9) and (12) clash, (9) prevails. When (6) and (11) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Izar has a steering committee?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002935", "pair_id": "u002935-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/11/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002935-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "401ce679144c0e71", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u002935-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is not cofunded. Izar is not budgeted. Izar is multicenter. Izar is endorsed. Izar has no patent filing. Izar is not translational. Izar has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is shortlisted, then it is peer reviewed. (2) If a proposal is translational, then it is not collaborative. (3) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is not a pilot study. (4) If a proposal is resubmitted, then it is not peer reviewed. (5) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is resubmitted. (6) If a proposal is peer reviewed and is endorsed, then it has a steering committee. (7) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is renewed. (8) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is collaborative. (9) If a proposal is cofunded and is budgeted, then it is not shortlisted. (10) If a proposal is shortlisted, then it is a pilot study. (11) If a proposal is peer reviewed and has ethics clearance and is budgeted, then it has no steering committee. (12) If a proposal has a patent filing, then it is shortlisted. (5) is void if the proposal is endorsed. When (1) and (4) clash, (1) prevails. When (10) and (3) clash, (10) prevails. When (2) and (8) clash, (2) prevails. When (9) and (12) clash, (9) prevails. When (6) and (11) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Izar has a steering committee?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002935", "pair_id": "u002935-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/11/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002935-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "24b21f7b01a6de6a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u002935-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is not cofunded. Izar is not budgeted. Izar is multicenter. Izar is endorsed. Izar has no patent filing. Izar is not translational. Izar has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is shortlisted, that proposal is peer reviewed. Item B. When the proposal is translational, that proposal is not collaborative. Item C. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal is not a pilot study. Item D. When the proposal is resubmitted, that proposal is not peer reviewed. Item E. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal is resubmitted. Item F. When the proposal is peer reviewed, and is endorsed, that proposal has a steering committee. Item G. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is renewed. Item H. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is collaborative. Item I. When the proposal is cofunded, and is budgeted, that proposal is not shortlisted. Item J. When the proposal is shortlisted, that proposal is a pilot study. Item K. When the proposal is peer reviewed, and has ethics clearance, and is budgeted, that proposal has no steering committee. Item L. When the proposal has no patent filing, that proposal is shortlisted. Item E is suspended when the proposal is endorsed. Item A outranks Item D. Item J outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item H. Item I outranks Item L. Item F outranks Item K. Question: Can one infer that Izar has a steering committee?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u002935", "pair_id": "u002935-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/11/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002935-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "401ce679144c0e71", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u002935-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is not cofunded. Izar is not budgeted. Izar is multicenter. Izar is endorsed. Izar has no patent filing. Izar is not translational. Izar has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is shortlisted, that proposal is peer reviewed. Item B. When the proposal is translational, that proposal is not collaborative. Item C. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal is not a pilot study. Item D. When the proposal is resubmitted, that proposal is not peer reviewed. Item E. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal is resubmitted. Item F. When the proposal is peer reviewed, and is endorsed, that proposal has a steering committee. Item G. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is renewed. Item H. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is collaborative. Item I. When the proposal is cofunded, and is budgeted, that proposal is not shortlisted. Item J. When the proposal is shortlisted, that proposal is a pilot study. Item K. When the proposal is peer reviewed, and has ethics clearance, and is budgeted, that proposal has no steering committee. Item L. When the proposal has a patent filing, that proposal is shortlisted. Item E is suspended when the proposal is endorsed. Item A outranks Item D. Item J outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item H. Item I outranks Item L. Item F outranks Item K. Question: Can one infer that Izar has a steering committee?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002935", "pair_id": "u002935-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/11/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002935-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "24b21f7b01a6de6a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u002942-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is not lapsed. Bruno is not a smoker. Wanda has no deductible waiver. Bruno is litigated. Bruno has roadside assistance. Bruno has a deductible waiver. Wanda is not grandfathered. Bruno is reinstated. Bruno is bundled. Bruno is retired. Bruno is lapsed. Wanda is covered. Bruno is covered. Wanda is reinstated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is not grandfathered while is reinstated, thus it is not disputed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is grandfathered, thus it is not inspected. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is bundled while is not a smoker, thus it is not subrogated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is bundled while has a deductible waiver, thus it is disputed. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has no roadside assistance while is not covered while is not grandfathered, thus it is inspected. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is disputed while is not a smoker while is lapsed, thus it has no dashcam. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is disputed while is a smoker while is bundled, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is not litigated, thus it is not uninsurable. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is not retired, thus it is uninsurable. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Would it be right to say that Bruno has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002942", "pair_id": "u002942-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002942-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "95198c1689e23b9e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u002942-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is not lapsed. Bruno is not a smoker. Wanda has no deductible waiver. Bruno is not litigated. Bruno has roadside assistance. Bruno has a deductible waiver. Wanda is not grandfathered. Bruno is reinstated. Bruno is bundled. Bruno is retired. Bruno is lapsed. Wanda is covered. Bruno is covered. Wanda is reinstated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is not grandfathered while is reinstated, thus it is not disputed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is grandfathered, thus it is not inspected. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is bundled while is not a smoker, thus it is not subrogated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is bundled while has a deductible waiver, thus it is disputed. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has no roadside assistance while is not covered while is not grandfathered, thus it is inspected. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is disputed while is not a smoker while is lapsed, thus it has no dashcam. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is disputed while is a smoker while is bundled, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is not litigated, thus it is not uninsurable. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is not retired, thus it is uninsurable. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Would it be right to say that Bruno has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002942", "pair_id": "u002942-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u002942-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6fb4d918fc92daf9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u002977-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is rerouted. Rasmus is refrigerated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it has no barcode. Provision 2: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it has a locker slot. Provision 3: when the parcel here is not consolidated, thus it is prepaid. Provision 4: when the parcel here is not consolidated, thus it is not prepaid. Provision 5: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it is not consolidated. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is rerouted. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is refrigerated. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is misrouted. Provision 4 has no effect when the parcel here is not misrouted. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Rasmus is prepaid?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002977", "pair_id": "u002977-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002977-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a8a2e4d2867617ad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u002977-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is rerouted. Rasmus is refrigerated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it has no barcode. Provision 2: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it has a locker slot. Provision 3: when the parcel here is not consolidated, thus it is prepaid. Provision 4: when the parcel here is not consolidated, thus it is not prepaid. Provision 5: when the parcel here is not refrigerated, thus it is not consolidated. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is rerouted. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is refrigerated. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is misrouted. Provision 4 has no effect when the parcel here is not misrouted. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Rasmus is prepaid?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002977", "pair_id": "u002977-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002977-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cafc565a014a8ed5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u002977-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is rerouted. Rasmus is refrigerated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is rerouted, it thereby has no barcode. Point B. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby has a locker slot. Point C. If said parcel is not consolidated, it thereby is prepaid. Point D. If said parcel is not consolidated, it thereby is not prepaid. Point E. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby is not consolidated. Point B is cancelled if said parcel is rerouted. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is refrigerated. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is misrouted. Point D is cancelled if said parcel is not misrouted. Point D supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Rasmus is prepaid. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002977", "pair_id": "u002977-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002977-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a8a2e4d2867617ad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u002977-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is rerouted. Rasmus is refrigerated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is rerouted, it thereby has no barcode. Point B. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby has a locker slot. Point C. If said parcel is not consolidated, it thereby is prepaid. Point D. If said parcel is not consolidated, it thereby is not prepaid. Point E. If said parcel is not refrigerated, it thereby is not consolidated. Point B is cancelled if said parcel is rerouted. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is refrigerated. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is misrouted. Point D is cancelled if said parcel is not misrouted. Point D supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Rasmus is prepaid. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002977", "pair_id": "u002977-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002977-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cafc565a014a8ed5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u002977-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is rerouted. Rasmus is refrigerated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is rerouted, so it has no barcode. No. 2 While the given parcel is refrigerated, so it has a locker slot. No. 3 While the given parcel is not consolidated, so it is prepaid. No. 4 While the given parcel is not consolidated, so it is not prepaid. No. 5 While the given parcel is refrigerated, so it is not consolidated. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given parcel is rerouted. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given parcel is refrigerated. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given parcel is misrouted. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given parcel is not misrouted. No. 4 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Rasmus is prepaid\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u002977", "pair_id": "u002977-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002977-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a8a2e4d2867617ad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u002977-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is rerouted. Rasmus is refrigerated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is rerouted, so it has no barcode. No. 2 While the given parcel is refrigerated, so it has a locker slot. No. 3 While the given parcel is not consolidated, so it is prepaid. No. 4 While the given parcel is not consolidated, so it is not prepaid. No. 5 While the given parcel is not refrigerated, so it is not consolidated. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given parcel is rerouted. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given parcel is refrigerated. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given parcel is misrouted. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given parcel is not misrouted. No. 4 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Rasmus is prepaid\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002977", "pair_id": "u002977-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002977-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cafc565a014a8ed5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u002984-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma is exploratory. Gemma has a milestone total of 27. Gemma is not renewed. Electra has a milestone total of 32. Deneb has a milestone total of 92. Deneb has a steering committee. Electra is not renewed. Electra is exploratory.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is preregistered provided that it has a milestone total lower than 49. Section 2: a proposal is not shortlisted provided that it is renewed. Section 3: a proposal has seed funding provided that it is not cofunded as well as has a milestone total of 28 or higher as well as is exploratory. Section 4: a proposal has no seed funding provided that it is not cofunded as well as has a milestone total lower than 28 as well as has a steering committee. Section 5: a proposal is not cofunded provided that it is preregistered. Question: Gemma has seed funding. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002984", "pair_id": "u002984-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002984-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "afa97a7ca84a4c80", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 19}}
{"id": "syn-u002984-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma is exploratory. Gemma has a milestone total of 59. Gemma is not renewed. Electra has a milestone total of 32. Deneb has a milestone total of 92. Deneb has a steering committee. Electra is not renewed. Electra is exploratory.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is preregistered provided that it has a milestone total lower than 49. Section 2: a proposal is not shortlisted provided that it is renewed. Section 3: a proposal has seed funding provided that it is not cofunded as well as has a milestone total of 28 or higher as well as is exploratory. Section 4: a proposal has no seed funding provided that it is not cofunded as well as has a milestone total lower than 28 as well as has a steering committee. Section 5: a proposal is not cofunded provided that it is preregistered. Question: Gemma has seed funding. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u002984", "pair_id": "u002984-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u002984-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "188553f5f59d586f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 19}}
{"id": "syn-u003053-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin is not prequalified. Corin is refinanced. Dagny is prequalified. Dagny is not underwritten. Dagny is refinanced. Dagny is indebted. Tomas is not bankrupt. Tomas is not prequalified. Tomas is not a homeowner. Corin has no cosigner. Dagny is a depositor. Dagny is a homeowner. Dagny has a cosigner. Tomas is not a depositor. Corin is a depositor. Corin is a homeowner.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is prequalified while has a cosigner while is bankrupt, thus it is not overdrawn. Provision 2: when the borrower here is a homeowner while is underwritten, thus it is employed. Provision 3: when the borrower here is a depositor while is refinanced while is a homeowner, thus it is not delinquent. Question: Would it be right to say that Dagny is overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003053", "pair_id": "u003053-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003053-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "5111231e0c24ca49", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003053-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin is not prequalified. Corin is refinanced. Dagny is prequalified. Dagny is not underwritten. Dagny is refinanced. Dagny is indebted. Tomas is not bankrupt. Tomas is not prequalified. Tomas is not a homeowner. Corin has no cosigner. Dagny is a depositor. Dagny is a homeowner. Dagny has a cosigner. Tomas is not a depositor. Corin is a depositor. Corin is a homeowner.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is prequalified while has a cosigner while is bankrupt, thus it is not overdrawn. Provision 2: when the borrower here is a homeowner while is underwritten, thus it is employed. Provision 3: when the borrower here is prequalified while is indebted while is a depositor, thus it is overdrawn. Provision 4: when the borrower here is a depositor while is refinanced while is a homeowner, thus it is not delinquent. Question: Would it be right to say that Dagny is overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003053", "pair_id": "u003053-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003053-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "631a5dcd23b52f33", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003053-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin is not prequalified. Corin is refinanced. Dagny is prequalified. Dagny is not underwritten. Dagny is refinanced. Dagny is indebted. Tomas is not bankrupt. Tomas is not prequalified. Tomas is not a homeowner. Corin has no cosigner. Dagny is a depositor. Dagny is a homeowner. Dagny has a cosigner. Tomas is not a depositor. Corin is a depositor. Corin is a homeowner.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is prequalified and further has a cosigner and further is bankrupt, it thereby is not overdrawn. Point B. If said borrower is a homeowner and further is underwritten, it thereby is employed. Point C. If said borrower is a depositor and further is refinanced and further is a homeowner, it thereby is not delinquent. Question: Statement: Dagny is overdrawn. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003053", "pair_id": "u003053-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003053-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "5111231e0c24ca49", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003053-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin is not prequalified. Corin is refinanced. Dagny is prequalified. Dagny is not underwritten. Dagny is refinanced. Dagny is indebted. Tomas is not bankrupt. Tomas is not prequalified. Tomas is not a homeowner. Corin has no cosigner. Dagny is a depositor. Dagny is a homeowner. Dagny has a cosigner. Tomas is not a depositor. Corin is a depositor. Corin is a homeowner.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is prequalified and further has a cosigner and further is bankrupt, it thereby is not overdrawn. Point B. If said borrower is a homeowner and further is underwritten, it thereby is employed. Point C. If said borrower is prequalified and further is indebted and further is a depositor, it thereby is overdrawn. Point D. If said borrower is a depositor and further is refinanced and further is a homeowner, it thereby is not delinquent. Question: Statement: Dagny is overdrawn. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003053", "pair_id": "u003053-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003053-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "631a5dcd23b52f33", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003053-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin is not prequalified. Corin is refinanced. Dagny is prequalified. Dagny is not underwritten. Dagny is refinanced. Dagny is indebted. Tomas is not bankrupt. Tomas is not prequalified. Tomas is not a homeowner. Corin has no cosigner. Dagny is a depositor. Dagny is a homeowner. Dagny has a cosigner. Tomas is not a depositor. Corin is a depositor. Corin is a homeowner.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is prequalified and likewise has a cosigner and likewise is bankrupt, so it is not overdrawn. No. 2 While the given borrower is a homeowner and likewise is underwritten, so it is employed. No. 3 While the given borrower is a depositor and likewise is refinanced and likewise is a homeowner, so it is not delinquent. Question: Is the claim \"Dagny is overdrawn\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003053", "pair_id": "u003053-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003053-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "5111231e0c24ca49", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003053-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin is not prequalified. Corin is refinanced. Dagny is prequalified. Dagny is not underwritten. Dagny is refinanced. Dagny is indebted. Tomas is not bankrupt. Tomas is not prequalified. Tomas is not a homeowner. Corin has no cosigner. Dagny is a depositor. Dagny is a homeowner. Dagny has a cosigner. Tomas is not a depositor. Corin is a depositor. Corin is a homeowner.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is prequalified and likewise has a cosigner and likewise is bankrupt, so it is not overdrawn. No. 2 While the given borrower is a homeowner and likewise is underwritten, so it is employed. No. 3 While the given borrower is prequalified and likewise is indebted and likewise is a depositor, so it is overdrawn. No. 4 While the given borrower is a depositor and likewise is refinanced and likewise is a homeowner, so it is not delinquent. Question: Is the claim \"Dagny is overdrawn\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003053", "pair_id": "u003053-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003053-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "631a5dcd23b52f33", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003057-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri has no roadside assistance. Xaver has a peril factor of 7. Xaver has a payout ceiling of 54. Xaver is uninsurable. Xaver has no roadside assistance. Xaver has a claim frequency of 70. Dmitri has no beneficiary. Xaver has a premium band of 14. Xaver has a beneficiary.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has roadside assistance, then it is appraised. (2) If a policyholder is lapsed and has a premium band below 15, then it is retired. (3) If a policyholder is not uninsurable, then it is reinstated. (4) If a policyholder is retired and has a claim frequency of at least 56 and has a beneficiary, then it is covered. (5) If a policyholder is lapsed, then it is subrogated. (6) If a policyholder is retired and has a claim frequency below 56 and has a peril factor below 12, then it is not covered. (7) If a policyholder has a payout ceiling below 85, then it is not lapsed. Question: Is it true that Xaver is covered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003057", "pair_id": "u003057-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003057-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "717a13dd37817664", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003057-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri has no roadside assistance. Xaver has a peril factor of 7. Xaver has a payout ceiling of 54. Xaver is uninsurable. Xaver has no roadside assistance. Xaver has a claim frequency of 70. Dmitri has no beneficiary. Xaver has a premium band of 14. Xaver has a beneficiary.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has roadside assistance, then it is appraised. (2) If a policyholder is not lapsed and has a premium band below 15, then it is retired. (3) If a policyholder is not uninsurable, then it is reinstated. (4) If a policyholder is retired and has a claim frequency of at least 56 and has a beneficiary, then it is covered. (5) If a policyholder is lapsed, then it is subrogated. (6) If a policyholder is retired and has a claim frequency below 56 and has a peril factor below 12, then it is not covered. (7) If a policyholder has a payout ceiling below 85, then it is not lapsed. Question: Is it true that Xaver is covered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003057", "pair_id": "u003057-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003057-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8c0c7d575296ceb2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003057-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri has no roadside assistance. Xaver has a peril factor of 7. Xaver has a payout ceiling of 54. Xaver is uninsurable. Xaver has no roadside assistance. Xaver has a claim frequency of 70. Dmitri has no beneficiary. Xaver has a premium band of 14. Xaver has a beneficiary.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also is appraised. Clause 2: once any policyholder is lapsed and also has a premium band under 15, it also is retired. Clause 3: once any policyholder is not uninsurable, it also is reinstated. Clause 4: once any policyholder is retired and also has a claim frequency of 56 or more and also has a beneficiary, it also is covered. Clause 5: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is subrogated. Clause 6: once any policyholder is retired and also has a claim frequency under 56 and also has a peril factor under 12, it also is not covered. Clause 7: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling under 85, it also is not lapsed. Question: Does it follow that Xaver is covered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003057", "pair_id": "u003057-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003057-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "717a13dd37817664", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003057-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri has no roadside assistance. Xaver has a peril factor of 7. Xaver has a payout ceiling of 54. Xaver is uninsurable. Xaver has no roadside assistance. Xaver has a claim frequency of 70. Dmitri has no beneficiary. Xaver has a premium band of 14. Xaver has a beneficiary.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also is appraised. Clause 2: once any policyholder is not lapsed and also has a premium band under 15, it also is retired. Clause 3: once any policyholder is not uninsurable, it also is reinstated. Clause 4: once any policyholder is retired and also has a claim frequency of 56 or more and also has a beneficiary, it also is covered. Clause 5: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is subrogated. Clause 6: once any policyholder is retired and also has a claim frequency under 56 and also has a peril factor under 12, it also is not covered. Clause 7: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling under 85, it also is not lapsed. Question: Does it follow that Xaver is covered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003057", "pair_id": "u003057-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003057-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8c0c7d575296ceb2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003060-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has industry backing. Hadar has industry backing. Electra is multicenter. Hadar is theoretical. Electra is not theoretical. Capella is shortlisted. Hadar is not endorsed. Betelgeuse is not shortlisted. Capella is endorsed. Betelgeuse is not cofunded. Electra is peer reviewed. Hadar is not multicenter. Capella is multicenter. Hadar is not interdisciplinary. Betelgeuse is peer reviewed. Hadar is budgeted. Hadar is not peer reviewed. Capella is cofunded. Electra is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has industry backing, that proposal is not preregistered. Item B. When the proposal is budgeted, and is multicenter, that proposal is not longitudinal. Item C. When the proposal is not endorsed, and is interdisciplinary, and is peer reviewed, that proposal is embargoed. Item D. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is preregistered. Item E. When the proposal is not endorsed, and is not interdisciplinary, that proposal is not embargoed. Item C is suspended when the proposal is shortlisted. Item C is suspended when the proposal is not theoretical, and has industry backing. Item B is suspended when the proposal has industry backing. Item D outranks Item A. Item E outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Hadar is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003060", "pair_id": "u003060-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003060-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "abfb866d349f42cc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003060-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has industry backing. Hadar has industry backing. Electra is multicenter. Hadar is theoretical. Electra is not theoretical. Capella is shortlisted. Hadar is cofunded. Hadar is not endorsed. Betelgeuse is not shortlisted. Capella is endorsed. Betelgeuse is not cofunded. Electra is peer reviewed. Hadar is not multicenter. Capella is multicenter. Hadar is not interdisciplinary. Betelgeuse is peer reviewed. Hadar is budgeted. Hadar is not peer reviewed. Capella is cofunded. Electra is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has industry backing, that proposal is not preregistered. Item B. When the proposal is budgeted, and is multicenter, that proposal is not longitudinal. Item C. When the proposal is not endorsed, and is interdisciplinary, and is peer reviewed, that proposal is embargoed. Item D. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is preregistered. Item E. When the proposal is not endorsed, and is not interdisciplinary, that proposal is not embargoed. Item C is suspended when the proposal is shortlisted. Item C is suspended when the proposal is not theoretical, and has industry backing. Item B is suspended when the proposal has industry backing. Item D outranks Item A. Item E outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Hadar is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003060", "pair_id": "u003060-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003060-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6226a8abbbb583f4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003098-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not prepaid. Jory has a parcel volume of 41. Jory is not prepaid. Liesel is not rerouted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it is not fragile. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a parcel volume beyond 23, thus it is fragile. Provision 3: when the parcel here is prepaid, thus it is not misrouted. Question: Would it be right to say that Jory is fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003098", "pair_id": "u003098-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003098-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "5207078643515df3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003098-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not prepaid. Jory has a parcel volume of 41. Jory is not prepaid. Liesel is not rerouted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it is not fragile. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a parcel volume at or below 23, thus it is fragile. Provision 3: when the parcel here is prepaid, thus it is not misrouted. Question: Would it be right to say that Jory is fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003098", "pair_id": "u003098-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003098-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "f58f89f006aa0b22", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003113-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is misrouted. Priya is tracked. Priya is palletized. Priya is not labeled. Priya is oversized. Priya is refrigerated. Priya is not damaged.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is misrouted, then it is registered. (2) If a parcel is rerouted and is oversized, then it is not hazardous. (3) If a parcel is palletized, then it has a waybill. (4) If a parcel is misrouted, then it is not rerouted. (5) If a parcel has a waybill and is oversized, then it is rerouted. (6) If a parcel is rerouted and is refrigerated, then it is hazardous. (7) If a parcel is labeled and is refrigerated, then it is not registered. (7) is void if the parcel is tracked. When (1) and (7) clash, (1) prevails. When (5) and (4) clash, (5) prevails. When (2) and (6) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Priya is hazardous?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003113", "pair_id": "u003113-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003113-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a490a69eadd2b00d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u003113-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is misrouted. Priya is tracked. Priya is palletized. Priya is not labeled. Priya is oversized. Priya is refrigerated. Priya is not damaged.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is misrouted, then it is registered. (2) If a parcel is rerouted and is oversized, then it is not hazardous. (3) If a parcel is palletized, then it has a waybill. (4) If a parcel is misrouted, then it is not rerouted. (5) If a parcel has a waybill and is oversized, then it is rerouted. (6) If a parcel is rerouted and is refrigerated, then it is hazardous. (7) If a parcel is labeled and is refrigerated, then it is not registered. (7) is void if the parcel is tracked. (2) is void if the parcel is refrigerated and is misrouted. When (1) and (7) clash, (1) prevails. When (5) and (4) clash, (5) prevails. When (2) and (6) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Priya is hazardous?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003113", "pair_id": "u003113-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003113-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "520555046d63f1b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u003113-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is misrouted. Priya is tracked. Priya is palletized. Priya is not labeled. Priya is oversized. Priya is refrigerated. Priya is not damaged.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is misrouted, that parcel is registered. Item B. When the parcel is rerouted, and is oversized, that parcel is not hazardous. Item C. When the parcel is palletized, that parcel has a waybill. Item D. When the parcel is misrouted, that parcel is not rerouted. Item E. When the parcel has a waybill, and is oversized, that parcel is rerouted. Item F. When the parcel is rerouted, and is refrigerated, that parcel is hazardous. Item G. When the parcel is labeled, and is refrigerated, that parcel is not registered. Item G is suspended when the parcel is tracked. Item A outranks Item G. Item E outranks Item D. Item B outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Priya is hazardous?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003113", "pair_id": "u003113-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003113-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a490a69eadd2b00d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u003113-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is misrouted. Priya is tracked. Priya is palletized. Priya is not labeled. Priya is oversized. Priya is refrigerated. Priya is not damaged.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is misrouted, that parcel is registered. Item B. When the parcel is rerouted, and is oversized, that parcel is not hazardous. Item C. When the parcel is palletized, that parcel has a waybill. Item D. When the parcel is misrouted, that parcel is not rerouted. Item E. When the parcel has a waybill, and is oversized, that parcel is rerouted. Item F. When the parcel is rerouted, and is refrigerated, that parcel is hazardous. Item G. When the parcel is labeled, and is refrigerated, that parcel is not registered. Item G is suspended when the parcel is tracked. Item B is suspended when the parcel is refrigerated, and is misrouted. Item A outranks Item G. Item E outranks Item D. Item B outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Priya is hazardous?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003113", "pair_id": "u003113-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003113-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "520555046d63f1b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u003146-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is reimbursed. Yara has no dashcam. Yara is not subrogated. Fabian has no flood coverage. Yara has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is reinstated provided that it has flood coverage. Section 2: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it is disputed. Section 3: a policyholder is disputed provided that it has a dashcam. Section 4: a policyholder is not disputed provided that it is not reimbursed. Section 5: a policyholder is appraised provided that it is subrogated. Question: Yara is disputed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003146", "pair_id": "u003146-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003146-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "ad8b55eb69732809", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003146-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is reimbursed. Yara has no dashcam. Yara is not subrogated. Fabian has no flood coverage. Yara has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is reinstated provided that it has flood coverage. Section 2: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it is disputed. Section 3: a policyholder is disputed provided that it has a dashcam. Section 4: a policyholder is not disputed provided that it is reimbursed. Section 5: a policyholder is appraised provided that it is subrogated. Question: Yara is disputed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003146", "pair_id": "u003146-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003146-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "eb2d55fbb65ed028", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003146-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is reimbursed. Yara has no dashcam. Yara is not subrogated. Fabian has no flood coverage. Yara has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has flood coverage: then it is reinstated. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is disputed: then it is not inspected. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam: then it is disputed. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is not reimbursed: then it is not disputed. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is subrogated: then it is appraised. Question: Is it so that Yara is disputed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003146", "pair_id": "u003146-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003146-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "ad8b55eb69732809", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003146-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is reimbursed. Yara has no dashcam. Yara is not subrogated. Fabian has no flood coverage. Yara has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has flood coverage: then it is reinstated. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is disputed: then it is not inspected. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam: then it is disputed. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed: then it is not disputed. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is subrogated: then it is appraised. Question: Is it so that Yara is disputed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003146", "pair_id": "u003146-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003146-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "eb2d55fbb65ed028", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003146-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is reimbursed. Yara has no dashcam. Yara is not subrogated. Fabian has no flood coverage. Yara has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has flood coverage, it then is reinstated. #2 Each time a policyholder is disputed, it then is not inspected. #3 Each time a policyholder has a dashcam, it then is disputed. #4 Each time a policyholder is not reimbursed, it then is not disputed. #5 Each time a policyholder is subrogated, it then is appraised. Question: Do the terms above show that Yara is disputed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003146", "pair_id": "u003146-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003146-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "ad8b55eb69732809", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003146-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is reimbursed. Yara has no dashcam. Yara is not subrogated. Fabian has no flood coverage. Yara has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has flood coverage, it then is reinstated. #2 Each time a policyholder is disputed, it then is not inspected. #3 Each time a policyholder has a dashcam, it then is disputed. #4 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then is not disputed. #5 Each time a policyholder is subrogated, it then is appraised. Question: Do the terms above show that Yara is disputed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003146", "pair_id": "u003146-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003146-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "eb2d55fbb65ed028", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003159-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has a diploma. Mads has a diploma. Rune has a notice period of 91. Ivo has a diploma. Ivo has a notice period of 23. Mads is not seasoned. Mads has a notice period of 10.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is probationary, that candidate has a signing bonus. Item B. When the candidate has a diploma, that candidate is probationary. Item C. When the candidate is probationary, that candidate has no signing bonus. Item D. When the candidate has a notice period of less than 65, that candidate is bonded. Item E. When the candidate is seasoned, that candidate is not a veteran. Item D is suspended when the candidate is seasoned. Item C is suspended when the candidate has a notice period of more than 11. Item B is suspended when the candidate has a notice period of more than 89. Item A is suspended when the candidate has a notice period of no more than 11. Question: Can one infer that Mads has no signing bonus?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003159", "pair_id": "u003159-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003159-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ca7ae7033d190063", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003159-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has a diploma. Mads has a diploma. Rune has a notice period of 91. Ivo has a diploma. Ivo has a notice period of 23. Mads is not seasoned. Mads has a notice period of 75.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is probationary, that candidate has a signing bonus. Item B. When the candidate has a diploma, that candidate is probationary. Item C. When the candidate is probationary, that candidate has no signing bonus. Item D. When the candidate has a notice period of less than 65, that candidate is bonded. Item E. When the candidate is seasoned, that candidate is not a veteran. Item D is suspended when the candidate is seasoned. Item C is suspended when the candidate has a notice period of more than 11. Item B is suspended when the candidate has a notice period of more than 89. Item A is suspended when the candidate has a notice period of no more than 11. Question: Can one infer that Mads has no signing bonus?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003159", "pair_id": "u003159-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003159-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1c258dcf5295c128", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003179-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno has a firewall. Cobalt is not encrypted. Juno has no GPU. Halcyon is not encrypted. Cobalt is not provisioned. Juno is provisioned. Juno is replicated. Halcyon has a firewall. Halcyon is replicated. Cobalt is not replicated. Juno is not encrypted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is mirrored provided that it is backed up as well as has a public endpoint. Section 2: a workload is backed up provided that it is provisioned as well as is replicated as well as has a firewall. Section 3: a workload is not mirrored provided that it is backed up as well as is virtualized as well as has a firewall. Section 4: a workload is not stateless provided that it has a GPU. Section 5: a workload is sharded provided that it is encrypted as well as is provisioned. Question: Juno is not mirrored. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003179", "pair_id": "u003179-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003179-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "5c7d1d8a9889c212", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003179-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is virtualized. Juno has a firewall. Cobalt is not encrypted. Juno has no GPU. Halcyon is not encrypted. Cobalt is not provisioned. Juno is provisioned. Juno is replicated. Halcyon has a firewall. Halcyon is replicated. Cobalt is not replicated. Juno is not encrypted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is mirrored provided that it is backed up as well as has a public endpoint. Section 2: a workload is backed up provided that it is provisioned as well as is replicated as well as has a firewall. Section 3: a workload is not mirrored provided that it is backed up as well as is virtualized as well as has a firewall. Section 4: a workload is not stateless provided that it has a GPU. Section 5: a workload is sharded provided that it is encrypted as well as is provisioned. Question: Juno is not mirrored. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003179", "pair_id": "u003179-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003179-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "a4295d6f7ce5f10e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003192-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has no beneficiary. Celeste has no flood coverage. Celeste has a premium discount. Zdenek has a premium discount. Zdenek is bundled. Zdenek is retired. Zdenek has no deductible waiver. Celeste is not bundled. Celeste is uninsurable. Zdenek is inspected. Zdenek has flood coverage. Zdenek is not uninsurable.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is reimbursed while is not bundled, thus it is not a smoker. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it is covered. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a premium discount while has flood coverage, thus it has roadside assistance. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary while has a deductible waiver while is disputed, thus it is not covered. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance while is retired, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is reimbursed while has a deductible waiver while is inspected, thus it is a smoker. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Would it be right to say that Zdenek is a smoker?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003192", "pair_id": "u003192-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003192-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "09331d279d21143e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003192-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has no beneficiary. Celeste has no flood coverage. Celeste has a premium discount. Zdenek has a premium discount. Zdenek is bundled. Zdenek is retired. Zdenek has no deductible waiver. Celeste is not bundled. Celeste is uninsurable. Zdenek is inspected. Zdenek has flood coverage. Zdenek is not uninsurable.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is reimbursed while is bundled, thus it is not a smoker. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it is covered. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a premium discount while has flood coverage, thus it has roadside assistance. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary while has a deductible waiver while is disputed, thus it is not covered. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance while is retired, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is reimbursed while has a deductible waiver while is inspected, thus it is a smoker. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Would it be right to say that Zdenek is a smoker?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003192", "pair_id": "u003192-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003192-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f2f385b59d59f651", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003203-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek is not litigated. Zdenek is reimbursed. Zdenek is not disputed. Zdenek is not subrogated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is lapsed. No. 2 While the given policyholder is not subrogated, so it is appraised. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not subrogated, so it is not covered. No. 4 While the given policyholder is subrogated, so it has a dashcam. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a premium band not below 25, so it is not appraised. No. 6 While the given policyholder is not reinstated, so it has flood coverage. No. 7 While the given policyholder is not reimbursed, so it has no dashcam. No. 8 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is not uninsurable. No. 9 While the given policyholder is lapsed, so it is indemnified. No. 10 While the given policyholder is disputed, so it is reinstated. No. 11 While the given policyholder is not covered, so it is not reinstated. No. 7 wins over No. 4. No. 10 wins over No. 11. No. 2 wins over No. 5. Question: Select what holds for Zdenek: which option?", "options": ["is indemnified", "has flood coverage"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has flood coverage", "unit_id": "u003203", "pair_id": "u003203-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003203-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f994c1393c9f3e40", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003203-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek is not litigated. Zdenek is reimbursed. Zdenek is not disputed. Zdenek is subrogated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is lapsed. No. 2 While the given policyholder is not subrogated, so it is appraised. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not subrogated, so it is not covered. No. 4 While the given policyholder is subrogated, so it has a dashcam. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a premium band not below 25, so it is not appraised. No. 6 While the given policyholder is not reinstated, so it has flood coverage. No. 7 While the given policyholder is not reimbursed, so it has no dashcam. No. 8 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is not uninsurable. No. 9 While the given policyholder is lapsed, so it is indemnified. No. 10 While the given policyholder is disputed, so it is reinstated. No. 11 While the given policyholder is not covered, so it is not reinstated. No. 7 wins over No. 4. No. 10 wins over No. 11. No. 2 wins over No. 5. Question: Select what holds for Zdenek: which option?", "options": ["is indemnified", "has flood coverage"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is indemnified", "unit_id": "u003203", "pair_id": "u003203-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003203-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "643e1cd0958b29f4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003219-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda has a payout ceiling of 61.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beneath 81, thus it is appraised. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beneath 60, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beyond 10, thus it is indemnified. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has no deductible waiver, thus it has a rider. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling at or below 10, thus it has no deductible waiver. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is indemnified, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 7: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary, thus it is uninsurable. Provision 8: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is not subrogated. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has a rider, thus it is inspected. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here has no roadside assistance. Question: Which one describes Wanda?", "options": ["is inspected", "is uninsurable"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is uninsurable", "unit_id": "u003219", "pair_id": "u003219-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003219-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "808f2b662fd0e65d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003219-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda has a payout ceiling of 43.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beneath 81, thus it is appraised. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beneath 60, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beyond 10, thus it is indemnified. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has no deductible waiver, thus it has a rider. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling at or below 10, thus it has no deductible waiver. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is indemnified, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 7: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary, thus it is uninsurable. Provision 8: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is not subrogated. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has a rider, thus it is inspected. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here has no roadside assistance. Question: Which one describes Wanda?", "options": ["is inspected", "is uninsurable"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is uninsurable", "unit_id": "u003219", "pair_id": "u003219-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003219-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "abc94e6bd4949c8f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003219-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda has a payout ceiling of 61.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has a payout ceiling short of 81, it thereby is appraised. Point B. If said policyholder has a payout ceiling short of 60, it thereby is reimbursed. Point C. If said policyholder has a payout ceiling in excess of 10, it thereby is indemnified. Point D. If said policyholder has no deductible waiver, it thereby has a rider. Point E. If said policyholder has a payout ceiling of maximum 10, it thereby has no deductible waiver. Point F. If said policyholder is indemnified, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point G. If said policyholder has a beneficiary, it thereby is uninsurable. Point H. If said policyholder has roadside assistance, it thereby is not subrogated. Point I. If said policyholder has a rider, it thereby is inspected. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder has no roadside assistance. Question: Which choice is true for Wanda?", "options": ["is inspected", "is uninsurable"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is uninsurable", "unit_id": "u003219", "pair_id": "u003219-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003219-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "808f2b662fd0e65d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003219-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda has a payout ceiling of 43.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has a payout ceiling short of 81, it thereby is appraised. Point B. If said policyholder has a payout ceiling short of 60, it thereby is reimbursed. Point C. If said policyholder has a payout ceiling in excess of 10, it thereby is indemnified. Point D. If said policyholder has no deductible waiver, it thereby has a rider. Point E. If said policyholder has a payout ceiling of maximum 10, it thereby has no deductible waiver. Point F. If said policyholder is indemnified, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point G. If said policyholder has a beneficiary, it thereby is uninsurable. Point H. If said policyholder has roadside assistance, it thereby is not subrogated. Point I. If said policyholder has a rider, it thereby is inspected. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder has no roadside assistance. Question: Which choice is true for Wanda?", "options": ["is inspected", "is uninsurable"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is uninsurable", "unit_id": "u003219", "pair_id": "u003219-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003219-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "abc94e6bd4949c8f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003241-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk has no escrow account. Anouk has a cosigner. Anouk is pensioned.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower has an escrow account, that borrower is a homeowner. Item B. When the borrower has a cosigner, that borrower has collateral. Item C. When the borrower is a homeowner, that borrower is audited. Item D. When the borrower is audited, that borrower is not indebted. Item E. When the borrower has a lien, that borrower is indebted. Item F. When the borrower is pensioned, that borrower is underwritten. Question: Can one infer that Anouk is indebted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003241", "pair_id": "u003241-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003241-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "5fddb68797040eec", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003241-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk has no escrow account. Anouk has a cosigner. Anouk is pensioned.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower has an escrow account, that borrower is a homeowner. Item B. When the borrower has a cosigner, that borrower has collateral. Item C. When the borrower has collateral, that borrower has a lien. Item D. When the borrower is a homeowner, that borrower is audited. Item E. When the borrower is audited, that borrower is not indebted. Item F. When the borrower has a lien, that borrower is indebted. Item G. When the borrower is pensioned, that borrower is underwritten. Question: Can one infer that Anouk is indebted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003241", "pair_id": "u003241-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003241-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "e0532d24b57d9792", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003249-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is endorsed. Kochab is budgeted. Kochab has no ethics clearance. Kochab is not cofunded. Kochab has a patent filing. Kochab is not theoretical. Kochab is not collaborative. Kochab is peer reviewed. Kochab has industry backing.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is exploratory, thus it has a field site. Provision 2: when the proposal here is interdisciplinary while is cofunded while has no ethics clearance, thus it is resubmitted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is not peer reviewed, thus it is not multicenter. Provision 4: when the proposal here is collaborative while is endorsed, thus it is multicenter. Provision 5: when the proposal here has ethics clearance, thus it is not resubmitted. Provision 6: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is budgeted, thus it is translational. Provision 7: when the proposal here has no patent filing while is endorsed, thus it has no field site. Provision 8: when the proposal here is translational while is not theoretical while is endorsed, thus it is not interdisciplinary. Provision 9: when the proposal here is translational while is theoretical while is not exploratory, thus it is interdisciplinary. Provision 9 has no effect when the proposal here is not peer reviewed while is not budgeted. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Kochab is interdisciplinary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003249", "pair_id": "u003249-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003249-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5875c36af79a7888", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003249-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is exploratory. Kochab is endorsed. Kochab is budgeted. Kochab has no ethics clearance. Kochab is not cofunded. Kochab has a patent filing. Kochab is not theoretical. Kochab is not collaborative. Kochab is peer reviewed. Kochab has industry backing.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is exploratory, thus it has a field site. Provision 2: when the proposal here is interdisciplinary while is cofunded while has no ethics clearance, thus it is resubmitted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is not peer reviewed, thus it is not multicenter. Provision 4: when the proposal here is collaborative while is endorsed, thus it is multicenter. Provision 5: when the proposal here has ethics clearance, thus it is not resubmitted. Provision 6: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is budgeted, thus it is translational. Provision 7: when the proposal here has no patent filing while is endorsed, thus it has no field site. Provision 8: when the proposal here is translational while is not theoretical while is endorsed, thus it is not interdisciplinary. Provision 9: when the proposal here is translational while is theoretical while is not exploratory, thus it is interdisciplinary. Provision 9 has no effect when the proposal here is not peer reviewed while is not budgeted. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Kochab is interdisciplinary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003249", "pair_id": "u003249-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003249-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4dd436925c6fc46a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003249-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is endorsed. Kochab is budgeted. Kochab has no ethics clearance. Kochab is not cofunded. Kochab has a patent filing. Kochab is not theoretical. Kochab is not collaborative. Kochab is peer reviewed. Kochab has industry backing.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is exploratory, it thereby has a field site. Point B. If said proposal is interdisciplinary and further is cofunded and further has no ethics clearance, it thereby is resubmitted. Point C. If said proposal is not peer reviewed, it thereby is not multicenter. Point D. If said proposal is collaborative and further is endorsed, it thereby is multicenter. Point E. If said proposal has ethics clearance, it thereby is not resubmitted. Point F. If said proposal has a patent filing and further is budgeted, it thereby is translational. Point G. If said proposal has no patent filing and further is endorsed, it thereby has no field site. Point H. If said proposal is translational and further is not theoretical and further is endorsed, it thereby is not interdisciplinary. Point I. If said proposal is translational and further is theoretical and further is not exploratory, it thereby is interdisciplinary. Point I is cancelled if said proposal is not peer reviewed and further is not budgeted. Point G supersedes Point A. Point I supersedes Point H. Point E supersedes Point B. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Kochab is interdisciplinary. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003249", "pair_id": "u003249-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003249-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5875c36af79a7888", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003249-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is exploratory. Kochab is endorsed. Kochab is budgeted. Kochab has no ethics clearance. Kochab is not cofunded. Kochab has a patent filing. Kochab is not theoretical. Kochab is not collaborative. Kochab is peer reviewed. Kochab has industry backing.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is exploratory, it thereby has a field site. Point B. If said proposal is interdisciplinary and further is cofunded and further has no ethics clearance, it thereby is resubmitted. Point C. If said proposal is not peer reviewed, it thereby is not multicenter. Point D. If said proposal is collaborative and further is endorsed, it thereby is multicenter. Point E. If said proposal has ethics clearance, it thereby is not resubmitted. Point F. If said proposal has a patent filing and further is budgeted, it thereby is translational. Point G. If said proposal has no patent filing and further is endorsed, it thereby has no field site. Point H. If said proposal is translational and further is not theoretical and further is endorsed, it thereby is not interdisciplinary. Point I. If said proposal is translational and further is theoretical and further is not exploratory, it thereby is interdisciplinary. Point I is cancelled if said proposal is not peer reviewed and further is not budgeted. Point G supersedes Point A. Point I supersedes Point H. Point E supersedes Point B. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Kochab is interdisciplinary. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003249", "pair_id": "u003249-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003249-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4dd436925c6fc46a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003249-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is endorsed. Kochab is budgeted. Kochab has no ethics clearance. Kochab is not cofunded. Kochab has a patent filing. Kochab is not theoretical. Kochab is not collaborative. Kochab is peer reviewed. Kochab has industry backing.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is exploratory, so it has a field site. No. 2 While the given proposal is interdisciplinary and likewise is cofunded and likewise has no ethics clearance, so it is resubmitted. No. 3 While the given proposal is not peer reviewed, so it is not multicenter. No. 4 While the given proposal is collaborative and likewise is endorsed, so it is multicenter. No. 5 While the given proposal has ethics clearance, so it is not resubmitted. No. 6 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is budgeted, so it is translational. No. 7 While the given proposal has no patent filing and likewise is endorsed, so it has no field site. No. 8 While the given proposal is translational and likewise is not theoretical and likewise is endorsed, so it is not interdisciplinary. No. 9 While the given proposal is translational and likewise is theoretical and likewise is not exploratory, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 9 stops applying as long as the given proposal is not peer reviewed and likewise is not budgeted. No. 7 wins over No. 1. No. 9 wins over No. 8. No. 5 wins over No. 2. No. 3 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Kochab is interdisciplinary\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003249", "pair_id": "u003249-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003249-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5875c36af79a7888", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003249-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is exploratory. Kochab is endorsed. Kochab is budgeted. Kochab has no ethics clearance. Kochab is not cofunded. Kochab has a patent filing. Kochab is not theoretical. Kochab is not collaborative. Kochab is peer reviewed. Kochab has industry backing.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is exploratory, so it has a field site. No. 2 While the given proposal is interdisciplinary and likewise is cofunded and likewise has no ethics clearance, so it is resubmitted. No. 3 While the given proposal is not peer reviewed, so it is not multicenter. No. 4 While the given proposal is collaborative and likewise is endorsed, so it is multicenter. No. 5 While the given proposal has ethics clearance, so it is not resubmitted. No. 6 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is budgeted, so it is translational. No. 7 While the given proposal has no patent filing and likewise is endorsed, so it has no field site. No. 8 While the given proposal is translational and likewise is not theoretical and likewise is endorsed, so it is not interdisciplinary. No. 9 While the given proposal is translational and likewise is theoretical and likewise is not exploratory, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 9 stops applying as long as the given proposal is not peer reviewed and likewise is not budgeted. No. 7 wins over No. 1. No. 9 wins over No. 8. No. 5 wins over No. 2. No. 3 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Kochab is interdisciplinary\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003249", "pair_id": "u003249-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003249-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4dd436925c6fc46a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003371-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not flaky. Schist is experimental. Schist is not notarized. Schist is backported. Schist has a defect tally of 33.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is not notarized, that build is compiled. Item B. When the build is signed, that build is fuzzed. Item C. When the build is compiled, that build is reproducible. Item D. When the build is compiled, that build is linted. Item E. When the build is experimental, that build is versioned. Item F. When the build is backported, that build is signed. Item G. When the build has a defect tally of less than 10, that build is not compiled. Item H. When the build is reproducible, that build is not obsolete. Item I. When the build is flaky, that build is not linted. Item J. When the build is fuzzed, that build is obsolete. Item K. When the build is flaky, that build is not signed. Item H outranks Item J. Item K outranks Item F. Item A outranks Item G. Item I outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Schist is obsolete?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003371", "pair_id": "u003371-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003371-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f091f96804160974", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003371-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not flaky. Schist is experimental. Schist is not notarized. Schist is backported. Schist has a defect tally of 33.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is notarized, that build is compiled. Item B. When the build is signed, that build is fuzzed. Item C. When the build is compiled, that build is reproducible. Item D. When the build is compiled, that build is linted. Item E. When the build is experimental, that build is versioned. Item F. When the build is backported, that build is signed. Item G. When the build has a defect tally of less than 10, that build is not compiled. Item H. When the build is reproducible, that build is not obsolete. Item I. When the build is flaky, that build is not linted. Item J. When the build is fuzzed, that build is obsolete. Item K. When the build is flaky, that build is not signed. Item H outranks Item J. Item K outranks Item F. Item A outranks Item G. Item I outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Schist is obsolete?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003371", "pair_id": "u003371-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003371-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "47498c8a8c7296e8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003410-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra is containerized. Kestrel is containerized. Kestrel has no dedicated host. Kestrel is encrypted. Tundra is not deprecated. Orrery is virtualized. Kestrel is not autoscaled. Tundra is not cached. Tundra is not virtualized. Orrery is isolated. Juno is not encrypted. Tundra has a dedicated host. Tundra is isolated. Orrery is not cached. Juno is cached. Orrery is containerized. Orrery is not deprecated. Tundra is not encrypted. Tundra is not throttled. Tundra is not autoscaled. Juno is throttled. Orrery has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is autoscaled, then it is replicated. (2) If a workload has a dedicated host, then it has no failover node. (3) If a workload is deprecated, then it is not mirrored. (4) If a workload has a dedicated host, then it is not replicated. (5) If a workload is isolated, then it is mirrored. (6) If a workload is containerized, then it has a failover node. (7) If a workload has a failover node, then it is backed up. (8) If a workload has a failover node, then it is not backed up. (6) is void if the workload is cached. (1) is void if the workload is throttled. (8) is void if the workload is virtualized. (7) is void if the workload is encrypted. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. When (1) and (4) clash, (1) prevails. When (6) and (2) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Tundra is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003410", "pair_id": "u003410-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003410-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c82f7212bbaf5e3c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u003410-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra is containerized. Kestrel is containerized. Kestrel has no dedicated host. Kestrel is encrypted. Tundra is not deprecated. Orrery is virtualized. Kestrel is not autoscaled. Tundra is not cached. Tundra is not virtualized. Orrery is isolated. Juno is not encrypted. Tundra has a dedicated host. Tundra is isolated. Orrery is not cached. Juno is cached. Orrery is containerized. Orrery is not deprecated. Tundra is not encrypted. Tundra is not throttled. Tundra is not autoscaled. Juno is throttled. Orrery has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is autoscaled, then it is replicated. (2) If a workload has a dedicated host, then it has no failover node. (3) If a workload is deprecated, then it is not mirrored. (4) If a workload has a dedicated host, then it is not replicated. (5) If a workload is isolated, then it is mirrored. (6) If a workload is containerized, then it has a failover node. (7) If a workload has a failover node, then it is backed up. (8) If a workload has a failover node, then it is not backed up. (6) is void if the workload is cached. (1) is void if the workload is throttled. (8) is void if the workload is virtualized. (7) is void if the workload is encrypted. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. When (7) and (8) clash, (7) prevails. When (1) and (4) clash, (1) prevails. When (6) and (2) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Tundra is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003410", "pair_id": "u003410-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003410-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "04479096453406cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u003410-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra is containerized. Kestrel is containerized. Kestrel has no dedicated host. Kestrel is encrypted. Tundra is not deprecated. Orrery is virtualized. Kestrel is not autoscaled. Tundra is not cached. Tundra is not virtualized. Orrery is isolated. Juno is not encrypted. Tundra has a dedicated host. Tundra is isolated. Orrery is not cached. Juno is cached. Orrery is containerized. Orrery is not deprecated. Tundra is not encrypted. Tundra is not throttled. Tundra is not autoscaled. Juno is throttled. Orrery has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is autoscaled, it also is replicated. Clause 2: once any workload has a dedicated host, it also has no failover node. Clause 3: once any workload is deprecated, it also is not mirrored. Clause 4: once any workload has a dedicated host, it also is not replicated. Clause 5: once any workload is isolated, it also is mirrored. Clause 6: once any workload is containerized, it also has a failover node. Clause 7: once any workload has a failover node, it also is backed up. Clause 8: once any workload has a failover node, it also is not backed up. Clause 6 does not hold for a workload when any workload is cached. Clause 1 does not hold for a workload when any workload is throttled. Clause 8 does not hold for a workload when any workload is virtualized. Clause 7 does not hold for a workload when any workload is encrypted. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Clause 8 overrides Clause 7. Clause 1 overrides Clause 4. Clause 6 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Tundra is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003410", "pair_id": "u003410-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003410-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c82f7212bbaf5e3c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u003410-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra is containerized. Kestrel is containerized. Kestrel has no dedicated host. Kestrel is encrypted. Tundra is not deprecated. Orrery is virtualized. Kestrel is not autoscaled. Tundra is not cached. Tundra is not virtualized. Orrery is isolated. Juno is not encrypted. Tundra has a dedicated host. Tundra is isolated. Orrery is not cached. Juno is cached. Orrery is containerized. Orrery is not deprecated. Tundra is not encrypted. Tundra is not throttled. Tundra is not autoscaled. Juno is throttled. Orrery has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is autoscaled, it also is replicated. Clause 2: once any workload has a dedicated host, it also has no failover node. Clause 3: once any workload is deprecated, it also is not mirrored. Clause 4: once any workload has a dedicated host, it also is not replicated. Clause 5: once any workload is isolated, it also is mirrored. Clause 6: once any workload is containerized, it also has a failover node. Clause 7: once any workload has a failover node, it also is backed up. Clause 8: once any workload has a failover node, it also is not backed up. Clause 6 does not hold for a workload when any workload is cached. Clause 1 does not hold for a workload when any workload is throttled. Clause 8 does not hold for a workload when any workload is virtualized. Clause 7 does not hold for a workload when any workload is encrypted. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Clause 7 overrides Clause 8. Clause 1 overrides Clause 4. Clause 6 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Tundra is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003410", "pair_id": "u003410-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003410-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "04479096453406cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u003410-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra is containerized. Kestrel is containerized. Kestrel has no dedicated host. Kestrel is encrypted. Tundra is not deprecated. Orrery is virtualized. Kestrel is not autoscaled. Tundra is not cached. Tundra is not virtualized. Orrery is isolated. Juno is not encrypted. Tundra has a dedicated host. Tundra is isolated. Orrery is not cached. Juno is cached. Orrery is containerized. Orrery is not deprecated. Tundra is not encrypted. Tundra is not throttled. Tundra is not autoscaled. Juno is throttled. Orrery has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is autoscaled, that workload is replicated. Item B. When the workload has a dedicated host, that workload has no failover node. Item C. When the workload is deprecated, that workload is not mirrored. Item D. When the workload has a dedicated host, that workload is not replicated. Item E. When the workload is isolated, that workload is mirrored. Item F. When the workload is containerized, that workload has a failover node. Item G. When the workload has a failover node, that workload is backed up. Item H. When the workload has a failover node, that workload is not backed up. Item F is suspended when the workload is cached. Item A is suspended when the workload is throttled. Item H is suspended when the workload is virtualized. Item G is suspended when the workload is encrypted. Item E outranks Item C. Item H outranks Item G. Item A outranks Item D. Item F outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Tundra is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003410", "pair_id": "u003410-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003410-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c82f7212bbaf5e3c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u003410-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra is containerized. Kestrel is containerized. Kestrel has no dedicated host. Kestrel is encrypted. Tundra is not deprecated. Orrery is virtualized. Kestrel is not autoscaled. Tundra is not cached. Tundra is not virtualized. Orrery is isolated. Juno is not encrypted. Tundra has a dedicated host. Tundra is isolated. Orrery is not cached. Juno is cached. Orrery is containerized. Orrery is not deprecated. Tundra is not encrypted. Tundra is not throttled. Tundra is not autoscaled. Juno is throttled. Orrery has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is autoscaled, that workload is replicated. Item B. When the workload has a dedicated host, that workload has no failover node. Item C. When the workload is deprecated, that workload is not mirrored. Item D. When the workload has a dedicated host, that workload is not replicated. Item E. When the workload is isolated, that workload is mirrored. Item F. When the workload is containerized, that workload has a failover node. Item G. When the workload has a failover node, that workload is backed up. Item H. When the workload has a failover node, that workload is not backed up. Item F is suspended when the workload is cached. Item A is suspended when the workload is throttled. Item H is suspended when the workload is virtualized. Item G is suspended when the workload is encrypted. Item E outranks Item C. Item G outranks Item H. Item A outranks Item D. Item F outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Tundra is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003410", "pair_id": "u003410-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003410-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "04479096453406cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u003411-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is shortlisted. Capella has no steering committee. Deneb has no steering committee. Kochab has no steering committee. Deneb is not budgeted. Kochab is not shortlisted. Capella is not shortlisted. Fomalhaut is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is longitudinal, it also is cofunded. Clause 2: once any proposal has a steering committee, it also is theoretical. Clause 3: once any proposal is budgeted, it also has industry backing. Clause 4: once any proposal is peer reviewed, it also is not longitudinal. Clause 5: once any proposal is shortlisted, it also is peer reviewed. Clause 6: once any proposal has a steering committee, it also is not a pilot study. Clause 7: once any proposal has industry backing, it also is longitudinal. Question: Does it follow that Deneb is not longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003411", "pair_id": "u003411-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003411-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "c35401103408e9ab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003411-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is shortlisted. Capella has no steering committee. Deneb has a steering committee. Kochab has no steering committee. Deneb is not budgeted. Kochab is not shortlisted. Capella is not shortlisted. Fomalhaut is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is longitudinal, it also is cofunded. Clause 2: once any proposal has a steering committee, it also is theoretical. Clause 3: once any proposal is budgeted, it also has industry backing. Clause 4: once any proposal is peer reviewed, it also is not longitudinal. Clause 5: once any proposal is shortlisted, it also is peer reviewed. Clause 6: once any proposal has a steering committee, it also is not a pilot study. Clause 7: once any proposal has industry backing, it also is longitudinal. Question: Does it follow that Deneb is not longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003411", "pair_id": "u003411-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003411-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "d3a8826e00300b85", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003423-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has an escrow account. Corin has a debt ratio of 28. Corin is garnished. Corin has a credit rating of 12.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is employed, then it is overdrawn. (2) If a borrower is garnished, then it has a guarantor. (3) If a borrower is garnished, then it has no guarantor. (4) If a borrower has an escrow account, then it is amortized. (5) If a borrower has a credit rating of at most 49, then it has no collateral. (3) is void if the borrower has a credit rating of at least 11. (2) is void if the borrower has a credit rating below 41. (5) is void if the borrower is garnished. (2) is void if the borrower has a debt ratio below 40. (4) is void if the borrower has a debt ratio above 82. Question: Is it true that Corin has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003423", "pair_id": "u003423-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003423-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f520b0dc4838a899", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003423-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has an escrow account. Corin has a debt ratio of 28. Corin is garnished. Corin has a credit rating of 12.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is employed, then it is overdrawn. (2) If a borrower is garnished, then it has a guarantor. (3) If a borrower is garnished, then it has no guarantor. (4) If a borrower has an escrow account, then it is amortized. (5) If a borrower has a credit rating of at most 49, then it has no collateral. (3) is void if the borrower has a credit rating of at least 41. (2) is void if the borrower has a credit rating below 41. (5) is void if the borrower is garnished. (2) is void if the borrower has a debt ratio below 40. (4) is void if the borrower has a debt ratio above 82. Question: Is it true that Corin has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003423", "pair_id": "u003423-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003423-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a3de07a55ee5a9e0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003445-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not autoscaled. Sierra is not idle. Zephyr has no snapshot. Sierra has a snapshot. Borealis is not idle. Zephyr is not idle. Quasar has a snapshot. Borealis has no snapshot. Zephyr is not autoscaled. Quasar is not idle.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a snapshot, it thereby is not throttled. Point B. If said workload is idle, it thereby is throttled. Point C. If said workload is autoscaled, it thereby is provisioned. Question: Statement: Zephyr is throttled. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003445", "pair_id": "u003445-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003445-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "53b08618bc88df53", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003445-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not autoscaled. Sierra is not idle. Zephyr has no snapshot. Sierra has a snapshot. Borealis is not idle. Zephyr is idle. Quasar has a snapshot. Borealis has no snapshot. Zephyr is not autoscaled. Quasar is not idle.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a snapshot, it thereby is not throttled. Point B. If said workload is idle, it thereby is throttled. Point C. If said workload is autoscaled, it thereby is provisioned. Question: Statement: Zephyr is throttled. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003445", "pair_id": "u003445-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003445-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "3e07e3d9b2c9fb77", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003445-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not autoscaled. Sierra is not idle. Zephyr has no snapshot. Sierra has a snapshot. Borealis is not idle. Zephyr is not idle. Quasar has a snapshot. Borealis has no snapshot. Zephyr is not autoscaled. Quasar is not idle.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a snapshot, so it is not throttled. No. 2 While the given workload is idle, so it is throttled. No. 3 While the given workload is autoscaled, so it is provisioned. Question: Is the claim \"Zephyr is throttled\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003445", "pair_id": "u003445-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003445-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "53b08618bc88df53", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003445-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not autoscaled. Sierra is not idle. Zephyr has no snapshot. Sierra has a snapshot. Borealis is not idle. Zephyr is idle. Quasar has a snapshot. Borealis has no snapshot. Zephyr is not autoscaled. Quasar is not idle.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a snapshot, so it is not throttled. No. 2 While the given workload is idle, so it is throttled. No. 3 While the given workload is autoscaled, so it is provisioned. Question: Is the claim \"Zephyr is throttled\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003445", "pair_id": "u003445-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003445-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "3e07e3d9b2c9fb77", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003456-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fomalhaut is not preregistered. Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Capella is not preregistered. Nashira has no steering committee. Fomalhaut has a steering committee. Capella has a steering committee. Capella has no seed funding. Capella has a milestone total of 72.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has no steering committee, thus it is not longitudinal. Provision 2: when the proposal here has no steering committee, thus it has no postdoc. Provision 3: when the proposal here has no steering committee, thus it is exploratory. Provision 4: when the proposal here has a steering committee, thus it is not exploratory. Provision 5: when the proposal here is preregistered, thus it has ethics clearance. Provision 6: when the proposal here has a milestone total at or above 54, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 7: when the proposal here has seed funding, thus it is renewed. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here has no steering committee. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Which one describes Capella?", "options": ["is exploratory", "is longitudinal", "is renewed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is longitudinal", "unit_id": "u003456", "pair_id": "u003456-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003456-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3850c46e359c2436", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a4", "a1", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003456-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fomalhaut is not preregistered. Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Capella is preregistered. Nashira has no steering committee. Fomalhaut has a steering committee. Capella has a steering committee. Capella has no seed funding. Capella has a milestone total of 72.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has no steering committee, thus it is not longitudinal. Provision 2: when the proposal here has no steering committee, thus it has no postdoc. Provision 3: when the proposal here has no steering committee, thus it is exploratory. Provision 4: when the proposal here has a steering committee, thus it is not exploratory. Provision 5: when the proposal here is preregistered, thus it has ethics clearance. Provision 6: when the proposal here has a milestone total at or above 54, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 7: when the proposal here has seed funding, thus it is renewed. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here has no steering committee. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Which one describes Capella?", "options": ["is exploratory", "is longitudinal", "is renewed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is longitudinal", "unit_id": "u003456", "pair_id": "u003456-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003456-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "591a85d799f37bbc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a4", "a1", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003460-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is foreclosed. Greta has a repayment grade of 49. Greta has no guarantor. Greta is prequalified. Greta is a homeowner. Greta is refinanced. Greta has a cosigner. Greta is creditworthy. Greta has a credit rating of 65. Greta is not amortized.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is vetted and is prequalified and is foreclosed, then it is a depositor. (2) If a borrower is vetted and is a homeowner and has a credit rating of at least 65, then it has a mortgage. (3) If a borrower has a repayment grade below 25 and is creditworthy, then it is delinquent. (4) If a borrower is amortized and has a cosigner, then it is garnished. (5) If a borrower has a repayment grade above 30, then it is vetted. (6) If a borrower is a depositor and has a repayment grade below 75 and is creditworthy, then it is underwritten. (7) If a borrower is a depositor and has a repayment grade of at least 75, then it is not underwritten. (6) is void if the borrower has a guarantor and is refinanced. Question: Is it true that Greta is underwritten?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003460", "pair_id": "u003460-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003460-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fc8c4d798a186035", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003460-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is foreclosed. Greta has a repayment grade of 49. Greta has no guarantor. Greta is prequalified. Greta is a homeowner. Greta is refinanced. Greta has a cosigner. Greta is creditworthy. Greta has a credit rating of 57. Greta is not amortized.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is vetted and is prequalified and is foreclosed, then it is a depositor. (2) If a borrower is vetted and is a homeowner and has a credit rating of at least 65, then it has a mortgage. (3) If a borrower has a repayment grade below 25 and is creditworthy, then it is delinquent. (4) If a borrower is amortized and has a cosigner, then it is garnished. (5) If a borrower has a repayment grade above 30, then it is vetted. (6) If a borrower is a depositor and has a repayment grade below 75 and is creditworthy, then it is underwritten. (7) If a borrower is a depositor and has a repayment grade of at least 75, then it is not underwritten. (6) is void if the borrower has a guarantor and is refinanced. Question: Is it true that Greta is underwritten?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003460", "pair_id": "u003460-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003460-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "298ce0150c294b08", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003464-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel is autoscaled. Sierra has a CPU quota of 53. Vesper has a CPU quota of 48. Sierra is not autoscaled. Vesper is isolated. Vesper is idle. Vesper is autoscaled. Sierra is isolated. Quasar has a CPU quota of 55. Quasar is not autoscaled. Quasar has a public endpoint. Kestrel is not isolated. Quasar is not idle. Kestrel is idle.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is not autoscaled and likewise is idle and likewise has a CPU quota that exceeds 78, so it is throttled. No. 2 While the given workload is idle, so it is not deprecated. No. 3 While the given workload is isolated, so it has no dedicated host. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload is idle. Question: Is the claim \"Vesper has a public endpoint\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003464", "pair_id": "u003464-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003464-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5a9e6e5f322e375b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003464-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel is autoscaled. Vesper has no public endpoint. Sierra has a CPU quota of 53. Vesper has a CPU quota of 48. Sierra is not autoscaled. Vesper is isolated. Vesper is idle. Vesper is autoscaled. Sierra is isolated. Quasar has a CPU quota of 55. Quasar is not autoscaled. Quasar has a public endpoint. Kestrel is not isolated. Quasar is not idle. Kestrel is idle.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is not autoscaled and likewise is idle and likewise has a CPU quota that exceeds 78, so it is throttled. No. 2 While the given workload is idle, so it is not deprecated. No. 3 While the given workload is isolated, so it has no dedicated host. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload is idle. Question: Is the claim \"Vesper has a public endpoint\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003464", "pair_id": "u003464-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003464-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "122869189cf41134", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003510-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not audited. Folke is garnished. Ingrid is not audited. Dagny is garnished. Dagny is not audited. Ingrid is not underwritten. Folke has a cosigner.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is not underwritten, so it is creditworthy. No. 2 While the given borrower is not garnished, so it is not creditworthy. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given borrower is audited. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Ingrid has no cosigner\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003510", "pair_id": "u003510-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003510-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e8b9ae29fc37daea", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003510-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not audited. Folke is garnished. Ingrid is not audited. Ingrid is not garnished. Dagny is garnished. Dagny is not audited. Ingrid is not underwritten. Folke has a cosigner.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is not underwritten, so it is creditworthy. No. 2 While the given borrower is not garnished, so it is not creditworthy. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given borrower is audited. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Ingrid has no cosigner\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003510", "pair_id": "u003510-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003510-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c880fb823d96947e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003538-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra is not mirrored. Juno is cached. Juno is not mirrored. Juno has a memory allotment of 49.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is cached: then it has no dedicated host. Policy II. Suppose that workload is backed up: then it has a public endpoint. Policy III. Suppose that workload is not cached: then it has a failover node. Policy IV. Suppose that workload has a failover node: then it is not sharded. Policy V. Suppose that workload is not sharded: then it is patched. Policy VI. Suppose that workload is replicated: then it is sandboxed. Policy VII. Suppose that workload has a memory allotment higher than 87: then it is backed up. Policy VIII. Suppose that workload is not backed up: then it is idle. Policy IX. Suppose that workload is mirrored: then it is deprecated. Policy X. Suppose that workload has no dedicated host: then it is replicated. Policy XI. Suppose that workload has a public endpoint: then it has a GPU. Policy VIII is waived if that workload is not cached. Question: Which choice is right for Juno?", "options": ["is patched", "has a GPU", "is sandboxed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is sandboxed", "unit_id": "u003538", "pair_id": "u003538-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003538-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8ded845dbfd67b7e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a13", "a8"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003538-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra is not mirrored. Juno is cached. Juno is mirrored. Juno has a memory allotment of 49.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is cached: then it has no dedicated host. Policy II. Suppose that workload is backed up: then it has a public endpoint. Policy III. Suppose that workload is not cached: then it has a failover node. Policy IV. Suppose that workload has a failover node: then it is not sharded. Policy V. Suppose that workload is not sharded: then it is patched. Policy VI. Suppose that workload is replicated: then it is sandboxed. Policy VII. Suppose that workload has a memory allotment higher than 87: then it is backed up. Policy VIII. Suppose that workload is not backed up: then it is idle. Policy IX. Suppose that workload is mirrored: then it is deprecated. Policy X. Suppose that workload has no dedicated host: then it is replicated. Policy XI. Suppose that workload has a public endpoint: then it has a GPU. Policy VIII is waived if that workload is not cached. Question: Which choice is right for Juno?", "options": ["is patched", "has a GPU", "is sandboxed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is sandboxed", "unit_id": "u003538", "pair_id": "u003538-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003538-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b6d836b5de7fbe77", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a13", "a8"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003538-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra is not mirrored. Juno is cached. Juno is not mirrored. Juno has a memory allotment of 49.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is cached, it then has no dedicated host. #2 Each time a workload is backed up, it then has a public endpoint. #3 Each time a workload is not cached, it then has a failover node. #4 Each time a workload has a failover node, it then is not sharded. #5 Each time a workload is not sharded, it then is patched. #6 Each time a workload is replicated, it then is sandboxed. #7 Each time a workload has a memory allotment greater than 87, it then is backed up. #8 Each time a workload is not backed up, it then is idle. #9 Each time a workload is mirrored, it then is deprecated. #10 Each time a workload has no dedicated host, it then is replicated. #11 Each time a workload has a public endpoint, it then has a GPU. #8 is set aside if a workload is not cached. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Juno?", "options": ["is patched", "has a GPU", "is sandboxed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is sandboxed", "unit_id": "u003538", "pair_id": "u003538-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003538-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8ded845dbfd67b7e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a13", "a8"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003538-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra is not mirrored. Juno is cached. Juno is mirrored. Juno has a memory allotment of 49.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is cached, it then has no dedicated host. #2 Each time a workload is backed up, it then has a public endpoint. #3 Each time a workload is not cached, it then has a failover node. #4 Each time a workload has a failover node, it then is not sharded. #5 Each time a workload is not sharded, it then is patched. #6 Each time a workload is replicated, it then is sandboxed. #7 Each time a workload has a memory allotment greater than 87, it then is backed up. #8 Each time a workload is not backed up, it then is idle. #9 Each time a workload is mirrored, it then is deprecated. #10 Each time a workload has no dedicated host, it then is replicated. #11 Each time a workload has a public endpoint, it then has a GPU. #8 is set aside if a workload is not cached. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Juno?", "options": ["is patched", "has a GPU", "is sandboxed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is sandboxed", "unit_id": "u003538", "pair_id": "u003538-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003538-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b6d836b5de7fbe77", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a13", "a8"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003570-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not exploratory. Capella is theoretical. Capella has ethics clearance. Fomalhaut is not endorsed. Fomalhaut is not exploratory. Fomalhaut is not theoretical. Gemma has a postdoc. Fomalhaut has ethics clearance. Fomalhaut has seed funding. Fomalhaut has a postdoc. Capella is not exploratory. Gemma is not exploratory. Kochab has no postdoc. Kochab is endorsed. Kochab has ethics clearance. Gemma is not endorsed.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is exploratory and is endorsed, then it has a patent filing. (2) If a proposal has ethics clearance and is longitudinal and is theoretical, then it is cofunded. (3) If a proposal is cofunded and is endorsed and has seed funding, then it is not embargoed. (4) If a proposal has ethics clearance and has no postdoc, then it is not cofunded. Question: Is it true that Kochab is cofunded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003570", "pair_id": "u003570-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003570-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "beca64a85656e2a8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u003570-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not exploratory. Capella is theoretical. Capella has ethics clearance. Fomalhaut is not endorsed. Fomalhaut is not exploratory. Fomalhaut is not theoretical. Gemma has a postdoc. Fomalhaut has ethics clearance. Fomalhaut has seed funding. Fomalhaut has a postdoc. Capella is not exploratory. Gemma is not exploratory. Kochab has no postdoc. Kochab is endorsed. Kochab has ethics clearance. Gemma is not endorsed.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is exploratory and is endorsed, then it has a patent filing. (2) If a proposal has ethics clearance and is longitudinal and is theoretical, then it is cofunded. (3) If a proposal is cofunded and is endorsed and has seed funding, then it is not embargoed. (4) If a proposal has ethics clearance and has a postdoc, then it is not cofunded. Question: Is it true that Kochab is cofunded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003570", "pair_id": "u003570-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003570-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "575cf92c0aec5e30", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u003580-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is indemnified. Bruno is not lapsed. Bruno has a payout ceiling of 92. Yara has a payout ceiling of 26.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is indemnified, then it is uninsurable. (2) If a policyholder is lapsed, then it is not covered. (3) If a policyholder is reinstated, then it is not uninsurable. (4) If a policyholder is indemnified, then it is bundled. (5) If a policyholder is bundled, then it is covered. (6) If a policyholder is not lapsed, then it is not bundled. (7) If a policyholder has a payout ceiling above 64, then it is appraised. When (3) and (1) clash, (3) prevails. When (6) and (4) clash, (6) prevails. When (5) and (2) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Bruno is not bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003580", "pair_id": "u003580-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003580-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bcf8b0b3cb5b3a0d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003580-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is indemnified. Bruno is not lapsed. Bruno has a payout ceiling of 92. Yara has a payout ceiling of 26.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is indemnified, then it is uninsurable. (2) If a policyholder is lapsed, then it is not covered. (3) If a policyholder is reinstated, then it is not uninsurable. (4) If a policyholder is indemnified, then it is bundled. (5) If a policyholder is bundled, then it is covered. (6) If a policyholder is lapsed, then it is not bundled. (7) If a policyholder has a payout ceiling above 64, then it is appraised. When (3) and (1) clash, (3) prevails. When (6) and (4) clash, (6) prevails. When (5) and (2) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Bruno is not bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003580", "pair_id": "u003580-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003580-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fd43b0b00ce46667", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003614-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has a premium discount. Wanda is not appraised. Wanda is not bundled. Fabian is not appraised. Dmitri is bundled. Wanda is not subrogated. Dmitri has a premium discount. Wanda has a premium discount. Fabian is not bundled. Dmitri is appraised. Fabian is not subrogated. Dmitri has no dashcam.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a premium discount, thus it is indemnified. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a dashcam, thus it has an adjuster. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is appraised, thus it is not lapsed. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has a premium discount, thus it is not uninsurable. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is appraised, thus it is lapsed. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here is not bundled. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here is not appraised. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here is bundled. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here is not subrogated. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here is not subrogated. Question: Would it be right to say that Dmitri is not lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003614", "pair_id": "u003614-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003614-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "395edd99e77df44b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003614-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has a premium discount. Wanda is not appraised. Wanda is not bundled. Fabian is not appraised. Dmitri is not bundled. Wanda is not subrogated. Dmitri has a premium discount. Wanda has a premium discount. Fabian is not bundled. Dmitri is appraised. Fabian is not subrogated. Dmitri has no dashcam.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a premium discount, thus it is indemnified. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a dashcam, thus it has an adjuster. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is appraised, thus it is not lapsed. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has a premium discount, thus it is not uninsurable. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is appraised, thus it is lapsed. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here is not bundled. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here is not appraised. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here is bundled. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here is not subrogated. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here is not subrogated. Question: Would it be right to say that Dmitri is not lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003614", "pair_id": "u003614-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003614-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fb1bd9c969f28b75", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003614-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has a premium discount. Wanda is not appraised. Wanda is not bundled. Fabian is not appraised. Dmitri is bundled. Wanda is not subrogated. Dmitri has a premium discount. Wanda has a premium discount. Fabian is not bundled. Dmitri is appraised. Fabian is not subrogated. Dmitri has no dashcam.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a premium discount, so it is indemnified. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it has an adjuster. No. 3 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it is not lapsed. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a premium discount, so it is not uninsurable. No. 5 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it is lapsed. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not bundled. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not appraised. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is bundled. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not subrogated. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not subrogated. Question: Is the claim \"Dmitri is not lapsed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003614", "pair_id": "u003614-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003614-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "395edd99e77df44b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003614-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has a premium discount. Wanda is not appraised. Wanda is not bundled. Fabian is not appraised. Dmitri is not bundled. Wanda is not subrogated. Dmitri has a premium discount. Wanda has a premium discount. Fabian is not bundled. Dmitri is appraised. Fabian is not subrogated. Dmitri has no dashcam.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a premium discount, so it is indemnified. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it has an adjuster. No. 3 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it is not lapsed. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a premium discount, so it is not uninsurable. No. 5 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it is lapsed. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not bundled. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not appraised. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is bundled. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not subrogated. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not subrogated. Question: Is the claim \"Dmitri is not lapsed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003614", "pair_id": "u003614-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003614-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fb1bd9c969f28b75", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003702-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is not subrogated. Celeste is not bundled. Celeste is subrogated. Una is subrogated. Celeste is grandfathered. Celeste has no roadside assistance. Wanda is bundled. Wanda is retired.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has an adjuster provided that it is grandfathered. Section 2: a policyholder has no adjuster provided that it is not subrogated. Section 3: a policyholder has no dashcam provided that it is grandfathered. Section 4: a policyholder is not reimbursed provided that it is bundled. Section 5: a policyholder is not uninsurable provided that it is retired. Section 6: a policyholder is uninsurable provided that it has roadside assistance. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Celeste is uninsurable. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003702", "pair_id": "u003702-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003702-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4888e407316a577a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003702-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is not subrogated. Celeste is not bundled. Celeste is subrogated. Una is subrogated. Celeste is grandfathered. Celeste has no roadside assistance. Wanda is bundled. Wanda is retired.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has an adjuster provided that it is grandfathered. Section 2: a policyholder has no adjuster provided that it is subrogated. Section 3: a policyholder has no dashcam provided that it is grandfathered. Section 4: a policyholder is not reimbursed provided that it is bundled. Section 5: a policyholder is not uninsurable provided that it is retired. Section 6: a policyholder is uninsurable provided that it has roadside assistance. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Celeste is uninsurable. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003702", "pair_id": "u003702-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003702-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "a0fb438d971aed0b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003750-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Basalt is not tagged. Basalt is obsolete. Basalt has a patch cycle of 23. Basalt is signed. Basalt is not linted. Basalt is not documented.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is benchmarked. Policy II. Suppose that build is benchmarked: then it is notarized. Policy III. Suppose that build is documented: then it is reproducible. Policy IV. Suppose that build is linted: then it has no feature toggle. Policy V. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is not backported. Policy VI. Suppose that build is signed: then it is not tested. Policy VII. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it is not compiled. Policy VIII. Suppose that build has no changelog: then it is not benchmarked. Policy IX. Suppose that build is obsolete: then it is merged. Policy X. Suppose that build is profiled: then it is fuzzed. Policy XI. Suppose that build has a patch cycle smaller than 49: then it has no changelog. Policy XII. Suppose that build has no migration script: then it is compiled. Policy XIII. Suppose that build is versioned: then it has a feature toggle. Policy XIV. Suppose that build is not tested: then it has no migration script. Policy XV. Suppose that build is tagged: then it has a migration script. Policy XVI. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it is versioned. In a clash, Policy XV beats Policy XIV. In a clash, Policy XIII beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy XII. Question: Which choice is right for Basalt?", "options": ["has a feature toggle", "is compiled", "is notarized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u003750", "pair_id": "u003750-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/10/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003750-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "009fe7f6184bd6fa", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a17", "a16"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u003750-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Basalt is not tagged. Basalt is obsolete. Basalt has a patch cycle of 23. Basalt is signed. Basalt is not linted. Basalt is not documented.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is benchmarked. Policy II. Suppose that build is benchmarked: then it is notarized. Policy III. Suppose that build is documented: then it is reproducible. Policy IV. Suppose that build is linted: then it has no feature toggle. Policy V. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is not backported. Policy VI. Suppose that build is signed: then it is not tested. Policy VII. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it is not compiled. Policy VIII. Suppose that build has no changelog: then it is not benchmarked. Policy IX. Suppose that build is obsolete: then it is merged. Policy X. Suppose that build is profiled: then it is fuzzed. Policy XI. Suppose that build has a patch cycle no lower than 49: then it has no changelog. Policy XII. Suppose that build has no migration script: then it is compiled. Policy XIII. Suppose that build is versioned: then it has a feature toggle. Policy XIV. Suppose that build is not tested: then it has no migration script. Policy XV. Suppose that build is tagged: then it has a migration script. Policy XVI. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it is versioned. In a clash, Policy XV beats Policy XIV. In a clash, Policy XIII beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy XII. Question: Which choice is right for Basalt?", "options": ["has a feature toggle", "is compiled", "is notarized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u003750", "pair_id": "u003750-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/10/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003750-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7877a519dd9a0328", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a17", "a16"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u003750-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Basalt is not tagged. Basalt is obsolete. Basalt has a patch cycle of 23. Basalt is signed. Basalt is not linted. Basalt is not documented.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is fuzzed, it then is benchmarked. #2 Each time a build is benchmarked, it then is notarized. #3 Each time a build is documented, it then is reproducible. #4 Each time a build is linted, it then has no feature toggle. #5 Each time a build is fuzzed, it then is not backported. #6 Each time a build is signed, it then is not tested. #7 Each time a build is reproducible, it then is not compiled. #8 Each time a build has no changelog, it then is not benchmarked. #9 Each time a build is obsolete, it then is merged. #10 Each time a build is profiled, it then is fuzzed. #11 Each time a build has a patch cycle less than 49, it then has no changelog. #12 Each time a build has no migration script, it then is compiled. #13 Each time a build is versioned, it then has a feature toggle. #14 Each time a build is not tested, it then has no migration script. #15 Each time a build is tagged, it then has a migration script. #16 Each time a build is reproducible, it then is versioned. #14 yields to #15. #4 yields to #13. #1 yields to #8. #12 yields to #7. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Basalt?", "options": ["has a feature toggle", "is compiled", "is notarized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u003750", "pair_id": "u003750-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/10/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003750-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "009fe7f6184bd6fa", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a17", "a16"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u003750-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Basalt is not tagged. Basalt is obsolete. Basalt has a patch cycle of 23. Basalt is signed. Basalt is not linted. Basalt is not documented.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is fuzzed, it then is benchmarked. #2 Each time a build is benchmarked, it then is notarized. #3 Each time a build is documented, it then is reproducible. #4 Each time a build is linted, it then has no feature toggle. #5 Each time a build is fuzzed, it then is not backported. #6 Each time a build is signed, it then is not tested. #7 Each time a build is reproducible, it then is not compiled. #8 Each time a build has no changelog, it then is not benchmarked. #9 Each time a build is obsolete, it then is merged. #10 Each time a build is profiled, it then is fuzzed. #11 Each time a build has a patch cycle of 49 or above, it then has no changelog. #12 Each time a build has no migration script, it then is compiled. #13 Each time a build is versioned, it then has a feature toggle. #14 Each time a build is not tested, it then has no migration script. #15 Each time a build is tagged, it then has a migration script. #16 Each time a build is reproducible, it then is versioned. #14 yields to #15. #4 yields to #13. #1 yields to #8. #12 yields to #7. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Basalt?", "options": ["has a feature toggle", "is compiled", "is notarized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u003750", "pair_id": "u003750-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/10/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003750-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7877a519dd9a0328", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a17", "a16"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u003759-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not benchmarked. Shale is compiled. Shale is not benchmarked.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is benchmarked, then it is signed. (2) If a build is benchmarked and is compiled, then it is not signed. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Shale is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003759", "pair_id": "u003759-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003759-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8e602ef1201ffe00", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003759-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not benchmarked. Shale is not compiled. Shale is not benchmarked.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is benchmarked, then it is signed. (2) If a build is benchmarked and is compiled, then it is not signed. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Shale is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003759", "pair_id": "u003759-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003759-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "dd960d8d6710d14d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u003835-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not vaccinated. Benedek is contagious. Benedek has a fever reading of 69. Benedek is vaccinated. Benedek is pregnant. Benedek is anemic. Zora is hypertensive. Zora is discharged. Zora has a fever reading of 16. Benedek has no caregiver. Benedek has a pain level of 73. Zora has a pain level of 68. Benedek is not postoperative. Benedek is discharged. Benedek is hypertensive. Zora has a mobility rank of 97. Zora is admitted. Benedek has a pacemaker. Zora is not rescheduled. Zora has no pacemaker.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is discharged while is contagious while is rescheduled, thus it is symptomatic. Provision 2: when the patient here is not pregnant, thus it is not symptomatic. Provision 3: when the patient here is triaged while has a fever reading at or below 19 while is pregnant, thus it is not allergic. Provision 4: when the patient here is triaged while has a fever reading beyond 19 while is hypertensive, thus it is allergic. Provision 5: when the patient here is fasting, thus it is triaged. Provision 6: when the patient here has a mobility rank beneath 25 while has a caregiver, thus it is asthmatic. Provision 7: when the patient here has a pain level at or below 40 while is admitted, thus it is not fasting. Provision 8: when the patient here is ambulatory while is anemic, thus it is not triaged. Provision 9: when the patient here is vaccinated while has a pacemaker, thus it is fasting. Provision 9 has no effect when the patient here is postoperative while has a pacemaker. Provision 3 has no effect when the patient here is ambulatory. Provision 6 has no effect when the patient here has a pacemaker. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Would it be right to say that Benedek is allergic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003835", "pair_id": "u003835-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003835-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "237e338cd777d771", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003835-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not vaccinated. Benedek is contagious. Benedek has a fever reading of 69. Benedek is vaccinated. Benedek is pregnant. Benedek is anemic. Zora is hypertensive. Zora is discharged. Zora has a fever reading of 16. Benedek has no caregiver. Benedek has a pain level of 73. Zora has a pain level of 68. Benedek is not postoperative. Benedek is discharged. Benedek is hypertensive. Zora has a mobility rank of 97. Zora is admitted. Benedek has a pacemaker. Zora is not rescheduled. Zora has no pacemaker.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is discharged while is contagious while is rescheduled, thus it is symptomatic. Provision 2: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it is not symptomatic. Provision 3: when the patient here is triaged while has a fever reading at or below 19 while is pregnant, thus it is not allergic. Provision 4: when the patient here is triaged while has a fever reading beyond 19 while is hypertensive, thus it is allergic. Provision 5: when the patient here is fasting, thus it is triaged. Provision 6: when the patient here has a mobility rank beneath 25 while has a caregiver, thus it is asthmatic. Provision 7: when the patient here has a pain level at or below 40 while is admitted, thus it is not fasting. Provision 8: when the patient here is ambulatory while is anemic, thus it is not triaged. Provision 9: when the patient here is vaccinated while has a pacemaker, thus it is fasting. Provision 9 has no effect when the patient here is postoperative while has a pacemaker. Provision 3 has no effect when the patient here is ambulatory. Provision 6 has no effect when the patient here has a pacemaker. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Would it be right to say that Benedek is allergic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003835", "pair_id": "u003835-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003835-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "465f9b9b880207c9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003835-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not vaccinated. Benedek is contagious. Benedek has a fever reading of 69. Benedek is vaccinated. Benedek is pregnant. Benedek is anemic. Zora is hypertensive. Zora is discharged. Zora has a fever reading of 16. Benedek has no caregiver. Benedek has a pain level of 73. Zora has a pain level of 68. Benedek is not postoperative. Benedek is discharged. Benedek is hypertensive. Zora has a mobility rank of 97. Zora is admitted. Benedek has a pacemaker. Zora is not rescheduled. Zora has no pacemaker.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is discharged and further is contagious and further is rescheduled, it thereby is symptomatic. Point B. If said patient is not pregnant, it thereby is not symptomatic. Point C. If said patient is triaged and further has a fever reading of maximum 19 and further is pregnant, it thereby is not allergic. Point D. If said patient is triaged and further has a fever reading in excess of 19 and further is hypertensive, it thereby is allergic. Point E. If said patient is fasting, it thereby is triaged. Point F. If said patient has a mobility rank short of 25 and further has a caregiver, it thereby is asthmatic. Point G. If said patient has a pain level of maximum 40 and further is admitted, it thereby is not fasting. Point H. If said patient is ambulatory and further is anemic, it thereby is not triaged. Point I. If said patient is vaccinated and further has a pacemaker, it thereby is fasting. Point I is cancelled if said patient is postoperative and further has a pacemaker. Point C is cancelled if said patient is ambulatory. Point F is cancelled if said patient has a pacemaker. Point C supersedes Point D. Point G supersedes Point I. Point A supersedes Point B. Point E supersedes Point H. Question: Statement: Benedek is allergic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003835", "pair_id": "u003835-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003835-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "237e338cd777d771", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003835-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not vaccinated. Benedek is contagious. Benedek has a fever reading of 69. Benedek is vaccinated. Benedek is pregnant. Benedek is anemic. Zora is hypertensive. Zora is discharged. Zora has a fever reading of 16. Benedek has no caregiver. Benedek has a pain level of 73. Zora has a pain level of 68. Benedek is not postoperative. Benedek is discharged. Benedek is hypertensive. Zora has a mobility rank of 97. Zora is admitted. Benedek has a pacemaker. Zora is not rescheduled. Zora has no pacemaker.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is discharged and further is contagious and further is rescheduled, it thereby is symptomatic. Point B. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby is not symptomatic. Point C. If said patient is triaged and further has a fever reading of maximum 19 and further is pregnant, it thereby is not allergic. Point D. If said patient is triaged and further has a fever reading in excess of 19 and further is hypertensive, it thereby is allergic. Point E. If said patient is fasting, it thereby is triaged. Point F. If said patient has a mobility rank short of 25 and further has a caregiver, it thereby is asthmatic. Point G. If said patient has a pain level of maximum 40 and further is admitted, it thereby is not fasting. Point H. If said patient is ambulatory and further is anemic, it thereby is not triaged. Point I. If said patient is vaccinated and further has a pacemaker, it thereby is fasting. Point I is cancelled if said patient is postoperative and further has a pacemaker. Point C is cancelled if said patient is ambulatory. Point F is cancelled if said patient has a pacemaker. Point C supersedes Point D. Point G supersedes Point I. Point A supersedes Point B. Point E supersedes Point H. Question: Statement: Benedek is allergic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003835", "pair_id": "u003835-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003835-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "465f9b9b880207c9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003835-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not vaccinated. Benedek is contagious. Benedek has a fever reading of 69. Benedek is vaccinated. Benedek is pregnant. Benedek is anemic. Zora is hypertensive. Zora is discharged. Zora has a fever reading of 16. Benedek has no caregiver. Benedek has a pain level of 73. Zora has a pain level of 68. Benedek is not postoperative. Benedek is discharged. Benedek is hypertensive. Zora has a mobility rank of 97. Zora is admitted. Benedek has a pacemaker. Zora is not rescheduled. Zora has no pacemaker.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is discharged and likewise is contagious and likewise is rescheduled, so it is symptomatic. No. 2 While the given patient is not pregnant, so it is not symptomatic. No. 3 While the given patient is triaged and likewise has a fever reading not above 19 and likewise is pregnant, so it is not allergic. No. 4 While the given patient is triaged and likewise has a fever reading that exceeds 19 and likewise is hypertensive, so it is allergic. No. 5 While the given patient is fasting, so it is triaged. No. 6 While the given patient has a mobility rank that falls below 25 and likewise has a caregiver, so it is asthmatic. No. 7 While the given patient has a pain level not above 40 and likewise is admitted, so it is not fasting. No. 8 While the given patient is ambulatory and likewise is anemic, so it is not triaged. No. 9 While the given patient is vaccinated and likewise has a pacemaker, so it is fasting. No. 9 stops applying as long as the given patient is postoperative and likewise has a pacemaker. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given patient is ambulatory. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given patient has a pacemaker. No. 3 wins over No. 4. No. 7 wins over No. 9. No. 1 wins over No. 2. No. 5 wins over No. 8. Question: Is the claim \"Benedek is allergic\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003835", "pair_id": "u003835-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003835-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "237e338cd777d771", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003835-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not vaccinated. Benedek is contagious. Benedek has a fever reading of 69. Benedek is vaccinated. Benedek is pregnant. Benedek is anemic. Zora is hypertensive. Zora is discharged. Zora has a fever reading of 16. Benedek has no caregiver. Benedek has a pain level of 73. Zora has a pain level of 68. Benedek is not postoperative. Benedek is discharged. Benedek is hypertensive. Zora has a mobility rank of 97. Zora is admitted. Benedek has a pacemaker. Zora is not rescheduled. Zora has no pacemaker.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is discharged and likewise is contagious and likewise is rescheduled, so it is symptomatic. No. 2 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is not symptomatic. No. 3 While the given patient is triaged and likewise has a fever reading not above 19 and likewise is pregnant, so it is not allergic. No. 4 While the given patient is triaged and likewise has a fever reading that exceeds 19 and likewise is hypertensive, so it is allergic. No. 5 While the given patient is fasting, so it is triaged. No. 6 While the given patient has a mobility rank that falls below 25 and likewise has a caregiver, so it is asthmatic. No. 7 While the given patient has a pain level not above 40 and likewise is admitted, so it is not fasting. No. 8 While the given patient is ambulatory and likewise is anemic, so it is not triaged. No. 9 While the given patient is vaccinated and likewise has a pacemaker, so it is fasting. No. 9 stops applying as long as the given patient is postoperative and likewise has a pacemaker. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given patient is ambulatory. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given patient has a pacemaker. No. 3 wins over No. 4. No. 7 wins over No. 9. No. 1 wins over No. 2. No. 5 wins over No. 8. Question: Is the claim \"Benedek is allergic\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003835", "pair_id": "u003835-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003835-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "465f9b9b880207c9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u003839-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke is indebted. Wiebke has a lien. Wiebke is overdrawn. Anouk is not overdrawn. Wiebke is not solvent. Anouk has a lien.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is indebted and is solvent, then it is pensioned. (2) If a borrower is overdrawn and is solvent, then it is not audited. (3) If a borrower is audited and has a lien, then it is not prequalified. (4) If a borrower is not solvent, then it is audited. (5) If a borrower is audited and has no lien, then it is prequalified. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. When (4) and (2) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Wiebke is not prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003839", "pair_id": "u003839-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003839-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f89a882c6754536a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u003839-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke is indebted. Wiebke has a lien. Wiebke is overdrawn. Anouk is not overdrawn. Wiebke is not solvent. Anouk has a lien.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is indebted and is solvent, then it is pensioned. (2) If a borrower is overdrawn and is solvent, then it is not audited. (3) If a borrower is audited and has a lien, then it is not prequalified. (4) If a borrower is solvent, then it is audited. (5) If a borrower is audited and has no lien, then it is prequalified. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. When (4) and (2) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Wiebke is not prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003839", "pair_id": "u003839-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003839-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e4ad02aee4cc77ff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u003839-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke is indebted. Wiebke has a lien. Wiebke is overdrawn. Anouk is not overdrawn. Wiebke is not solvent. Anouk has a lien.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is indebted and also is solvent, it also is pensioned. Clause 2: once any borrower is overdrawn and also is solvent, it also is not audited. Clause 3: once any borrower is audited and also has a lien, it also is not prequalified. Clause 4: once any borrower is not solvent, it also is audited. Clause 5: once any borrower is audited and also has no lien, it also is prequalified. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Clause 4 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Wiebke is not prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u003839", "pair_id": "u003839-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003839-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f89a882c6754536a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u003839-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke is indebted. Wiebke has a lien. Wiebke is overdrawn. Anouk is not overdrawn. Wiebke is not solvent. Anouk has a lien.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is indebted and also is solvent, it also is pensioned. Clause 2: once any borrower is overdrawn and also is solvent, it also is not audited. Clause 3: once any borrower is audited and also has a lien, it also is not prequalified. Clause 4: once any borrower is solvent, it also is audited. Clause 5: once any borrower is audited and also has no lien, it also is prequalified. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Clause 4 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Wiebke is not prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003839", "pair_id": "u003839-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003839-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e4ad02aee4cc77ff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u003902-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is not a depositor. Ingrid has a lien. Ingrid has a credit rating of 5.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has no lien, it also is audited. Clause 2: once any borrower has a credit rating of 76 or less, it also is underwritten. Clause 3: once any borrower is employed, it also has no collateral. Clause 4: once any borrower is underwritten, it also is employed. Clause 5: once any borrower has a lien, it also has a cosigner. Clause 6: once any borrower is employed, it also has collateral. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is delinquent. Clause 6 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is a depositor. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is not a depositor. Question: Does it follow that Ingrid has no collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003902", "pair_id": "u003902-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003902-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "76e1a8d794063ad5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u003902-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is not a depositor. Ingrid has a lien. Ingrid has a credit rating of 5.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has no lien, it also is audited. Clause 2: once any borrower has a credit rating over 76, it also is underwritten. Clause 3: once any borrower is employed, it also has no collateral. Clause 4: once any borrower is underwritten, it also is employed. Clause 5: once any borrower has a lien, it also has a cosigner. Clause 6: once any borrower is employed, it also has collateral. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is delinquent. Clause 6 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is a depositor. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is not a depositor. Question: Does it follow that Ingrid has no collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003902", "pair_id": "u003902-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003902-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f3dfec0d14eb901a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u003902-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is not a depositor. Ingrid has a lien. Ingrid has a credit rating of 5.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower has no lien, that borrower is audited. Item B. When the borrower has a credit rating of no more than 76, that borrower is underwritten. Item C. When the borrower is employed, that borrower has no collateral. Item D. When the borrower is underwritten, that borrower is employed. Item E. When the borrower has a lien, that borrower has a cosigner. Item F. When the borrower is employed, that borrower has collateral. Item C is suspended when the borrower is delinquent. Item F is suspended when the borrower is a depositor. Item C is suspended when the borrower is not a depositor. Question: Can one infer that Ingrid has no collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u003902", "pair_id": "u003902-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003902-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "76e1a8d794063ad5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u003902-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is not a depositor. Ingrid has a lien. Ingrid has a credit rating of 5.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower has no lien, that borrower is audited. Item B. When the borrower has a credit rating of more than 76, that borrower is underwritten. Item C. When the borrower is employed, that borrower has no collateral. Item D. When the borrower is underwritten, that borrower is employed. Item E. When the borrower has a lien, that borrower has a cosigner. Item F. When the borrower is employed, that borrower has collateral. Item C is suspended when the borrower is delinquent. Item F is suspended when the borrower is a depositor. Item C is suspended when the borrower is not a depositor. Question: Can one infer that Ingrid has no collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u003902", "pair_id": "u003902-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003902-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f3dfec0d14eb901a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u003939-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel has a pacemaker. Wendel is asthmatic. Wendel is fasting. Wendel is ambulatory. Wendel is not pregnant. Wendel is vaccinated. Wendel is not rescheduled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a pacemaker, it also is sedated. Clause 2: once any patient is asthmatic and also is ambulatory, it also is bedridden. Clause 3: once any patient has a chaperone, it also has no interpreter. Clause 4: once any patient has a chaperone, it also is not sedated. Clause 5: once any patient is asthmatic and also is vaccinated and also is fasting, it also is diabetic. Clause 6: once any patient is asthmatic and also is fasting and also is pregnant, it also has an interpreter. Clause 7: once any patient is asthmatic and also has a chaperone and also is rescheduled, it also is triaged. Clause 8: once any patient is vaccinated, it also is not bedridden. Clause 8 overrides Clause 2. Clause 3 overrides Clause 6. Clause 1 overrides Clause 4. Question: Which of these is true of Wendel?", "options": ["is diabetic", "is triaged", "is bedridden", "has an interpreter"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is diabetic", "unit_id": "u003939", "pair_id": "u003939-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003939-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "45b32e0a98883606", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a2", "a8", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003939-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel has a pacemaker. Wendel is asthmatic. Wendel is fasting. Wendel is ambulatory. Wendel is not pregnant. Wendel has a chaperone. Wendel is vaccinated. Wendel is not rescheduled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a pacemaker, it also is sedated. Clause 2: once any patient is asthmatic and also is ambulatory, it also is bedridden. Clause 3: once any patient has a chaperone, it also has no interpreter. Clause 4: once any patient has a chaperone, it also is not sedated. Clause 5: once any patient is asthmatic and also is vaccinated and also is fasting, it also is diabetic. Clause 6: once any patient is asthmatic and also is fasting and also is pregnant, it also has an interpreter. Clause 7: once any patient is asthmatic and also has a chaperone and also is rescheduled, it also is triaged. Clause 8: once any patient is vaccinated, it also is not bedridden. Clause 8 overrides Clause 2. Clause 3 overrides Clause 6. Clause 1 overrides Clause 4. Question: Which of these is true of Wendel?", "options": ["is diabetic", "is triaged", "is bedridden", "has an interpreter"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is diabetic", "unit_id": "u003939", "pair_id": "u003939-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u003939-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "196c6dcbf1fab0af", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a2", "a8", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u003989-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Talc is not localized. Quartz is minified. Quartz is fuzzed. Quartz is backported. Talc is reverted. Talc is profiled. Quartz is not notarized. Talc is not versioned. Talc has a security advisory. Quartz is not versioned. Quartz is profiled. Quartz has no security advisory. Quartz is reverted. Quartz is merged. Quartz is not linted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is reverted and also is minified, it also is benchmarked. Clause 2: once any build has a changelog and also is localized, it also is tested. Clause 3: once any build has a changelog and also is reproducible, it also is signed. Clause 4: once any build has a changelog and also is versioned, it also is flaky. Clause 5: once any build is benchmarked, it also has a changelog. Clause 6: once any build is fuzzed and also is linted, it also is documented. Clause 7: once any build has a changelog and also is notarized, it also is obsolete. Clause 8: once any build has a changelog and also is profiled, it also is compiled. Clause 9: once any build has a changelog and also has a security advisory and also is merged, it also has a feature toggle. Clause 8 does not hold for a build when any build is versioned. Clause 7 does not hold for a build when any build has a security advisory. Clause 7 does not hold for a build when any build is backported. Clause 2 does not hold for a build when any build is reproducible. Question: Which of these is true of Quartz?", "options": ["is flaky", "has a feature toggle", "is compiled", "is signed", "is obsolete", "is tested"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u003989", "pair_id": "u003989-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003989-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2de7023cf30c30d8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a16", "a10", "a8", "a19", "a9", "a12"]}, "attempt": 34}}
{"id": "syn-u003989-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Talc is not localized. Quartz is minified. Quartz is fuzzed. Quartz is backported. Talc is reverted. Talc is profiled. Quartz is not notarized. Talc is not versioned. Talc has a security advisory. Quartz is not versioned. Quartz is profiled. Quartz has no security advisory. Quartz is reverted. Quartz is merged. Quartz is linted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is reverted and also is minified, it also is benchmarked. Clause 2: once any build has a changelog and also is localized, it also is tested. Clause 3: once any build has a changelog and also is reproducible, it also is signed. Clause 4: once any build has a changelog and also is versioned, it also is flaky. Clause 5: once any build is benchmarked, it also has a changelog. Clause 6: once any build is fuzzed and also is linted, it also is documented. Clause 7: once any build has a changelog and also is notarized, it also is obsolete. Clause 8: once any build has a changelog and also is profiled, it also is compiled. Clause 9: once any build has a changelog and also has a security advisory and also is merged, it also has a feature toggle. Clause 8 does not hold for a build when any build is versioned. Clause 7 does not hold for a build when any build has a security advisory. Clause 7 does not hold for a build when any build is backported. Clause 2 does not hold for a build when any build is reproducible. Question: Which of these is true of Quartz?", "options": ["is flaky", "has a feature toggle", "is compiled", "is signed", "is obsolete", "is tested"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u003989", "pair_id": "u003989-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u003989-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d2c95463103386b8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a16", "a10", "a8", "a19", "a9", "a12"]}, "attempt": 34}}
{"id": "syn-u004016-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid is bonded. Sigrid is unionized. Sigrid has a signing bonus. Sigrid is relocating. Sigrid has a portfolio. Sigrid is not headhunted. Sigrid is not a graduate.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is headhunted and further is bilingual and further is a veteran, it thereby is certified. Point B. If said candidate is headhunted and further is bonded, it thereby is not certified. Point C. If said candidate is not relocating and further is unionized, it thereby has a background screening. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is a graduate. Point B is cancelled if said candidate has a portfolio and further is a veteran. Point A is cancelled if said candidate is headhunted and further has a signing bonus. Point A supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Sigrid is not certified. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004016", "pair_id": "u004016-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004016-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2bc8301ef3a9169e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004016-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid is bonded. Sigrid is unionized. Sigrid has a signing bonus. Sigrid is relocating. Sigrid has a portfolio. Sigrid is not headhunted. Sigrid is not a graduate.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is headhunted and further is bilingual and further is a veteran, it thereby is certified. Point B. If said candidate is headhunted and further is bonded, it thereby is not certified. Point C. If said candidate is relocating and further is unionized, it thereby has a background screening. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is a graduate. Point B is cancelled if said candidate has a portfolio and further is a veteran. Point A is cancelled if said candidate is headhunted and further has a signing bonus. Point A supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Sigrid is not certified. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004016", "pair_id": "u004016-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004016-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "25b3d2eac093d8de", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004016-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid is bonded. Sigrid is unionized. Sigrid has a signing bonus. Sigrid is relocating. Sigrid has a portfolio. Sigrid is not headhunted. Sigrid is not a graduate.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is headhunted and likewise is bilingual and likewise is a veteran, so it is certified. No. 2 While the given candidate is headhunted and likewise is bonded, so it is not certified. No. 3 While the given candidate is not relocating and likewise is unionized, so it has a background screening. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is a graduate. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a portfolio and likewise is a veteran. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given candidate is headhunted and likewise has a signing bonus. No. 1 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Sigrid is not certified\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004016", "pair_id": "u004016-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004016-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2bc8301ef3a9169e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004016-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid is bonded. Sigrid is unionized. Sigrid has a signing bonus. Sigrid is relocating. Sigrid has a portfolio. Sigrid is not headhunted. Sigrid is not a graduate.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is headhunted and likewise is bilingual and likewise is a veteran, so it is certified. No. 2 While the given candidate is headhunted and likewise is bonded, so it is not certified. No. 3 While the given candidate is relocating and likewise is unionized, so it has a background screening. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is a graduate. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a portfolio and likewise is a veteran. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given candidate is headhunted and likewise has a signing bonus. No. 1 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Sigrid is not certified\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004016", "pair_id": "u004016-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004016-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "25b3d2eac093d8de", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004055-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor has an aptitude quotient of 15. Noor has a notice period of 28.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate has a signing bonus, then it is not recommended. (2) If a candidate is not eligible, then it is onboarded. (3) If a candidate has an aptitude quotient of at least 20, then it is interviewed. (4) If a candidate has an aptitude quotient below 20, then it is bilingual. (5) If a candidate has a notice period below 29, then it is not onboarded. (6) If a candidate is eligible, then it is a graduate. (7) If a candidate has a commute radius of at most 57, then it is freelance. (8) If a candidate has a commute radius above 57, then it has a mentor. (9) If a candidate is headhunted, then it is recommended. When (1) and (9) clash, (1) prevails. When (5) and (2) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Noor?", "options": ["is a graduate", "is bilingual", "has a mentor", "is interviewed", "is freelance", "is onboarded"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bilingual", "unit_id": "u004055", "pair_id": "u004055-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004055-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f71070840de93114", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a3", "a2", "a10", "a6"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u004055-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor has an aptitude quotient of 15. Noor has a notice period of 90.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate has a signing bonus, then it is not recommended. (2) If a candidate is not eligible, then it is onboarded. (3) If a candidate has an aptitude quotient of at least 20, then it is interviewed. (4) If a candidate has an aptitude quotient below 20, then it is bilingual. (5) If a candidate has a notice period below 29, then it is not onboarded. (6) If a candidate is eligible, then it is a graduate. (7) If a candidate has a commute radius of at most 57, then it is freelance. (8) If a candidate has a commute radius above 57, then it has a mentor. (9) If a candidate is headhunted, then it is recommended. When (1) and (9) clash, (1) prevails. When (5) and (2) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Noor?", "options": ["is a graduate", "is bilingual", "has a mentor", "is interviewed", "is freelance", "is onboarded"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bilingual", "unit_id": "u004055", "pair_id": "u004055-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004055-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f9958cde98d75729", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a3", "a2", "a10", "a6"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u004055-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor has an aptitude quotient of 15. Noor has a notice period of 28.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate has a signing bonus, it also is not recommended. Clause 2: once any candidate is not eligible, it also is onboarded. Clause 3: once any candidate has an aptitude quotient of 20 or more, it also is interviewed. Clause 4: once any candidate has an aptitude quotient under 20, it also is bilingual. Clause 5: once any candidate has a notice period under 29, it also is not onboarded. Clause 6: once any candidate is eligible, it also is a graduate. Clause 7: once any candidate has a commute radius of 57 or less, it also is freelance. Clause 8: once any candidate has a commute radius over 57, it also has a mentor. Clause 9: once any candidate is headhunted, it also is recommended. Clause 1 overrides Clause 9. Clause 5 overrides Clause 2. Question: Which of these is true of Noor?", "options": ["is a graduate", "is bilingual", "has a mentor", "is interviewed", "is freelance", "is onboarded"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bilingual", "unit_id": "u004055", "pair_id": "u004055-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004055-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f71070840de93114", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a3", "a2", "a10", "a6"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u004055-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor has an aptitude quotient of 15. Noor has a notice period of 90.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate has a signing bonus, it also is not recommended. Clause 2: once any candidate is not eligible, it also is onboarded. Clause 3: once any candidate has an aptitude quotient of 20 or more, it also is interviewed. Clause 4: once any candidate has an aptitude quotient under 20, it also is bilingual. Clause 5: once any candidate has a notice period under 29, it also is not onboarded. Clause 6: once any candidate is eligible, it also is a graduate. Clause 7: once any candidate has a commute radius of 57 or less, it also is freelance. Clause 8: once any candidate has a commute radius over 57, it also has a mentor. Clause 9: once any candidate is headhunted, it also is recommended. Clause 1 overrides Clause 9. Clause 5 overrides Clause 2. Question: Which of these is true of Noor?", "options": ["is a graduate", "is bilingual", "has a mentor", "is interviewed", "is freelance", "is onboarded"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bilingual", "unit_id": "u004055", "pair_id": "u004055-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004055-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f9958cde98d75729", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a3", "a2", "a10", "a6"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u004055-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor has an aptitude quotient of 15. Noor has a notice period of 28.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate has a signing bonus, that candidate is not recommended. Item B. When the candidate is not eligible, that candidate is onboarded. Item C. When the candidate has an aptitude quotient of no less than 20, that candidate is interviewed. Item D. When the candidate has an aptitude quotient of less than 20, that candidate is bilingual. Item E. When the candidate has a notice period of less than 29, that candidate is not onboarded. Item F. When the candidate is eligible, that candidate is a graduate. Item G. When the candidate has a commute radius of no more than 57, that candidate is freelance. Item H. When the candidate has a commute radius of more than 57, that candidate has a mentor. Item I. When the candidate is headhunted, that candidate is recommended. Item A outranks Item I. Item E outranks Item B. Question: What applies to Noor?", "options": ["is a graduate", "is bilingual", "has a mentor", "is interviewed", "is freelance", "is onboarded"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bilingual", "unit_id": "u004055", "pair_id": "u004055-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004055-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f71070840de93114", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a3", "a2", "a10", "a6"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u004055-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor has an aptitude quotient of 15. Noor has a notice period of 90.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate has a signing bonus, that candidate is not recommended. Item B. When the candidate is not eligible, that candidate is onboarded. Item C. When the candidate has an aptitude quotient of no less than 20, that candidate is interviewed. Item D. When the candidate has an aptitude quotient of less than 20, that candidate is bilingual. Item E. When the candidate has a notice period of less than 29, that candidate is not onboarded. Item F. When the candidate is eligible, that candidate is a graduate. Item G. When the candidate has a commute radius of no more than 57, that candidate is freelance. Item H. When the candidate has a commute radius of more than 57, that candidate has a mentor. Item I. When the candidate is headhunted, that candidate is recommended. Item A outranks Item I. Item E outranks Item B. Question: What applies to Noor?", "options": ["is a graduate", "is bilingual", "has a mentor", "is interviewed", "is freelance", "is onboarded"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bilingual", "unit_id": "u004055", "pair_id": "u004055-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004055-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f9958cde98d75729", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a3", "a2", "a10", "a6"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u004061-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nashira has a postdoc. Nashira is collaborative. Betelgeuse has no ethics clearance.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is not collaborative: then it is not theoretical. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is endorsed: then it has seed funding. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has ethics clearance: then it is a pilot study. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is not theoretical: then it is endorsed. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has no ethics clearance: then it is interdisciplinary. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has no postdoc: then it is renewed. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal is multicenter: then it is not resubmitted. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal is not resubmitted: then it is peer reviewed. Policy IX. Suppose that proposal is collaborative: then it is multicenter. Question: Which choice is right for Nashira?", "options": ["is peer reviewed", "has seed funding"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is peer reviewed", "unit_id": "u004061", "pair_id": "u004061-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004061-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "842b44454af26bea", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004061-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nashira has a postdoc. Nashira is not collaborative. Betelgeuse has no ethics clearance.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is not collaborative: then it is not theoretical. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is endorsed: then it has seed funding. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has ethics clearance: then it is a pilot study. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is not theoretical: then it is endorsed. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has no ethics clearance: then it is interdisciplinary. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has no postdoc: then it is renewed. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal is multicenter: then it is not resubmitted. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal is not resubmitted: then it is peer reviewed. Policy IX. Suppose that proposal is collaborative: then it is multicenter. Question: Which choice is right for Nashira?", "options": ["is peer reviewed", "has seed funding"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has seed funding", "unit_id": "u004061", "pair_id": "u004061-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004061-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "f973d093fe3b389c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004067-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid has a guarantor. Ingrid is not creditworthy. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 48. Ingrid is not bankrupt. Ingrid has no escrow account.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is bankrupt, thus it is not indebted. Provision 2: when the borrower here has a debt ratio at or above 32, thus it has a cosigner. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a guarantor, thus it has a lien. Provision 4: when the borrower here is creditworthy, thus it is garnished. Provision 5: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it is solvent. Provision 6: when the borrower here has an escrow account, thus it is not garnished. Provision 7: when the borrower here is underwritten, thus it is not solvent. Provision 8: when the borrower here has a lien, thus it is underwritten. Provision 9: when the borrower here has a cosigner, thus it is not underwritten. Provision 10: when the borrower here has a risk tier beyond 23, thus it has no lien. Provision 11: when the borrower here is creditworthy, thus it is indebted. Provision 12: when the borrower here is indebted, thus it is refinanced. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 11 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 10. Question: Would it be right to say that Ingrid is solvent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004067", "pair_id": "u004067-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004067-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d688601bd2a4758f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004067-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid has a guarantor. Ingrid is not creditworthy. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 48. Ingrid is not bankrupt. Ingrid has no escrow account.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is bankrupt, thus it is not indebted. Provision 2: when the borrower here has a debt ratio beneath 32, thus it has a cosigner. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a guarantor, thus it has a lien. Provision 4: when the borrower here is creditworthy, thus it is garnished. Provision 5: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it is solvent. Provision 6: when the borrower here has an escrow account, thus it is not garnished. Provision 7: when the borrower here is underwritten, thus it is not solvent. Provision 8: when the borrower here has a lien, thus it is underwritten. Provision 9: when the borrower here has a cosigner, thus it is not underwritten. Provision 10: when the borrower here has a risk tier beyond 23, thus it has no lien. Provision 11: when the borrower here is creditworthy, thus it is indebted. Provision 12: when the borrower here is indebted, thus it is refinanced. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 11 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 10. Question: Would it be right to say that Ingrid is solvent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004067", "pair_id": "u004067-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004067-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ced046cce6239247", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004067-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid has a guarantor. Ingrid is not creditworthy. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 48. Ingrid is not bankrupt. Ingrid has no escrow account.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is bankrupt, it thereby is not indebted. Point B. If said borrower has a debt ratio of minimum 32, it thereby has a cosigner. Point C. If said borrower has a guarantor, it thereby has a lien. Point D. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is garnished. Point E. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby is solvent. Point F. If said borrower has an escrow account, it thereby is not garnished. Point G. If said borrower is underwritten, it thereby is not solvent. Point H. If said borrower has a lien, it thereby is underwritten. Point I. If said borrower has a cosigner, it thereby is not underwritten. Point J. If said borrower has a risk tier in excess of 23, it thereby has no lien. Point K. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is indebted. Point L. If said borrower is indebted, it thereby is refinanced. Point F supersedes Point D. Point H supersedes Point I. Point K supersedes Point A. Point E supersedes Point G. Point C supersedes Point J. Question: Statement: Ingrid is solvent. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004067", "pair_id": "u004067-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004067-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d688601bd2a4758f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004067-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid has a guarantor. Ingrid is not creditworthy. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 48. Ingrid is not bankrupt. Ingrid has no escrow account.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is bankrupt, it thereby is not indebted. Point B. If said borrower has a debt ratio short of 32, it thereby has a cosigner. Point C. If said borrower has a guarantor, it thereby has a lien. Point D. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is garnished. Point E. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby is solvent. Point F. If said borrower has an escrow account, it thereby is not garnished. Point G. If said borrower is underwritten, it thereby is not solvent. Point H. If said borrower has a lien, it thereby is underwritten. Point I. If said borrower has a cosigner, it thereby is not underwritten. Point J. If said borrower has a risk tier in excess of 23, it thereby has no lien. Point K. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is indebted. Point L. If said borrower is indebted, it thereby is refinanced. Point F supersedes Point D. Point H supersedes Point I. Point K supersedes Point A. Point E supersedes Point G. Point C supersedes Point J. Question: Statement: Ingrid is solvent. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004067", "pair_id": "u004067-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004067-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ced046cce6239247", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004102-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is reimbursed. Viggo is reimbursed. Bruno has no premium discount. Bruno is disputed. Viggo has no deductible waiver. Bruno has a dashcam. Zdenek is not reimbursed. Viggo is disputed. Zdenek has a dashcam. Bruno has a deductible waiver. Bruno has no roadside assistance. Bruno is subrogated. Zdenek has a premium discount. Zdenek is not subrogated. Viggo is subrogated. Bruno is not a claimant. Zdenek is retired.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is uninsurable provided that it is litigated as well as is subrogated as well as is reimbursed. Section 2: a policyholder is not reinstated provided that it is a claimant. Section 3: a policyholder is inspected provided that it has a dashcam. Section 4: a policyholder is not litigated provided that it is retired as well as has a deductible waiver. Section 5: a policyholder is reinstated provided that it is not disputed. Section 6: a policyholder is not uninsurable provided that it is litigated as well as is a claimant. Section 7: a policyholder is litigated provided that it has a deductible waiver as well as has roadside assistance. Section 8: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it is reimbursed. Section 7 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium discount. Section 5 lapses for a policyholder if it has roadside assistance. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Bruno is uninsurable. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004102", "pair_id": "u004102-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004102-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3ff0f53157dd0205", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u004102-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is reimbursed. Viggo is reimbursed. Bruno has no premium discount. Bruno is disputed. Viggo has no deductible waiver. Bruno has a dashcam. Zdenek is not reimbursed. Viggo is disputed. Zdenek has a dashcam. Bruno has a deductible waiver. Bruno has no roadside assistance. Bruno is subrogated. Zdenek has a premium discount. Zdenek is not subrogated. Viggo is subrogated. Bruno is not a claimant. Zdenek is retired.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is uninsurable provided that it is litigated as well as is subrogated as well as is reimbursed. Section 2: a policyholder is not reinstated provided that it is a claimant. Section 3: a policyholder is inspected provided that it has a dashcam. Section 4: a policyholder is not litigated provided that it is retired as well as has a deductible waiver. Section 5: a policyholder is reinstated provided that it is disputed. Section 6: a policyholder is not uninsurable provided that it is litigated as well as is a claimant. Section 7: a policyholder is litigated provided that it has a deductible waiver as well as has roadside assistance. Section 8: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it is reimbursed. Section 7 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium discount. Section 5 lapses for a policyholder if it has roadside assistance. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Bruno is uninsurable. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004102", "pair_id": "u004102-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004102-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d00ca2d42f985cb8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u004142-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk is refinanced. Anouk has no escrow account. Anouk is audited. Anouk has a risk tier of 95. Anouk is not employed. Anouk is prequalified. Anouk is not a depositor.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has a lien, thus it is not solvent. Provision 2: when the borrower here has a cosigner while is audited while has a risk tier beyond 89, thus it is solvent. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a cosigner while has a lien, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 4: when the borrower here is prequalified, thus it is garnished. Provision 5: when the borrower here is not employed, thus it has a lien. Provision 6: when the borrower here is a depositor, thus it has no lien. Provision 7: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it is overdrawn. Provision 8: when the borrower here is garnished, thus it has a cosigner. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here is refinanced while has a risk tier beneath 89. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Which one describes Anouk?", "options": ["is foreclosed", "is solvent"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is foreclosed", "unit_id": "u004142", "pair_id": "u004142-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004142-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4721634a6d93c766", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a9"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u004142-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk is refinanced. Anouk has no escrow account. Anouk is audited. Anouk has a risk tier of 95. Anouk is not employed. Anouk is prequalified. Anouk is not a depositor.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has a lien, thus it is not solvent. Provision 2: when the borrower here has a cosigner while is audited while has a risk tier beyond 89, thus it is solvent. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a cosigner while has a lien, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 4: when the borrower here is prequalified, thus it is garnished. Provision 5: when the borrower here is employed, thus it has a lien. Provision 6: when the borrower here is a depositor, thus it has no lien. Provision 7: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it is overdrawn. Provision 8: when the borrower here is garnished, thus it has a cosigner. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here is refinanced while has a risk tier beneath 89. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Which one describes Anouk?", "options": ["is foreclosed", "is solvent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is solvent", "unit_id": "u004142", "pair_id": "u004142-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004142-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3cd2723ad2aa705b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a9"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u004233-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara is indemnified. Yara has a peril factor of 0. Una has a peril factor of 10. Viggo has no rider. Yara has roadside assistance. Una has roadside assistance. Viggo has a claim frequency of 77. Yara has a rider. Yara has no flood coverage. Agata has a peril factor of 1. Agata has a claim frequency of 66.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it is reinstated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a rider, thus it is bundled. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is not covered. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is appraised. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it is covered. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is a smoker. Provision 7: when the policyholder here has a peril factor beneath 24, thus it is not reinstated. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it is litigated. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary, thus it has a deductible waiver. Provision 10: when the policyholder here has a claim frequency at or below 72, thus it is uninsurable. Provision 11: when the policyholder here has a claim frequency beyond 72, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Which one describes Yara?", "options": ["is litigated", "is appraised", "is covered", "has a deductible waiver"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is covered", "unit_id": "u004233", "pair_id": "u004233-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004233-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9551783d9d3c0676", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a9", "a13", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004233-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara is indemnified. Yara has a peril factor of 0. Una has a peril factor of 10. Viggo has no rider. Yara has roadside assistance. Una has roadside assistance. Viggo has a claim frequency of 77. Yara has a rider. Yara has no flood coverage. Agata has a peril factor of 1. Agata has a claim frequency of 66.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it is reinstated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a rider, thus it is bundled. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is not covered. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is appraised. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it is covered. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is a smoker. Provision 7: when the policyholder here has a peril factor at or above 24, thus it is not reinstated. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it is litigated. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary, thus it has a deductible waiver. Provision 10: when the policyholder here has a claim frequency at or below 72, thus it is uninsurable. Provision 11: when the policyholder here has a claim frequency beyond 72, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Which one describes Yara?", "options": ["is litigated", "is appraised", "is covered", "has a deductible waiver"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is covered", "unit_id": "u004233", "pair_id": "u004233-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004233-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fc378d40da2a272a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a9", "a13", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004233-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara is indemnified. Yara has a peril factor of 0. Una has a peril factor of 10. Viggo has no rider. Yara has roadside assistance. Una has roadside assistance. Viggo has a claim frequency of 77. Yara has a rider. Yara has no flood coverage. Agata has a peril factor of 1. Agata has a claim frequency of 66.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby is reinstated. Point B. If said policyholder has a rider, it thereby is bundled. Point C. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby is not covered. Point D. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby is appraised. Point E. If said policyholder is bundled, it thereby is covered. Point F. If said policyholder has roadside assistance, it thereby is a smoker. Point G. If said policyholder has a peril factor short of 24, it thereby is not reinstated. Point H. If said policyholder is uninsurable, it thereby is litigated. Point I. If said policyholder has a beneficiary, it thereby has a deductible waiver. Point J. If said policyholder has a claim frequency of maximum 72, it thereby is uninsurable. Point K. If said policyholder has a claim frequency in excess of 72, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point C supersedes Point E. Point A supersedes Point G. Question: Which choice is true for Yara?", "options": ["is litigated", "is appraised", "is covered", "has a deductible waiver"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is covered", "unit_id": "u004233", "pair_id": "u004233-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004233-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9551783d9d3c0676", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a9", "a13", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004233-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara is indemnified. Yara has a peril factor of 0. Una has a peril factor of 10. Viggo has no rider. Yara has roadside assistance. Una has roadside assistance. Viggo has a claim frequency of 77. Yara has a rider. Yara has no flood coverage. Agata has a peril factor of 1. Agata has a claim frequency of 66.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby is reinstated. Point B. If said policyholder has a rider, it thereby is bundled. Point C. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby is not covered. Point D. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby is appraised. Point E. If said policyholder is bundled, it thereby is covered. Point F. If said policyholder has roadside assistance, it thereby is a smoker. Point G. If said policyholder has a peril factor of minimum 24, it thereby is not reinstated. Point H. If said policyholder is uninsurable, it thereby is litigated. Point I. If said policyholder has a beneficiary, it thereby has a deductible waiver. Point J. If said policyholder has a claim frequency of maximum 72, it thereby is uninsurable. Point K. If said policyholder has a claim frequency in excess of 72, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point C supersedes Point E. Point A supersedes Point G. Question: Which choice is true for Yara?", "options": ["is litigated", "is appraised", "is covered", "has a deductible waiver"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is covered", "unit_id": "u004233", "pair_id": "u004233-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004233-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fc378d40da2a272a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a9", "a13", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004233-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara is indemnified. Yara has a peril factor of 0. Una has a peril factor of 10. Viggo has no rider. Yara has roadside assistance. Una has roadside assistance. Viggo has a claim frequency of 77. Yara has a rider. Yara has no flood coverage. Agata has a peril factor of 1. Agata has a claim frequency of 66.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has flood coverage, so it is reinstated. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a rider, so it is bundled. No. 3 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it is not covered. No. 4 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it is appraised. No. 5 While the given policyholder is bundled, so it is covered. No. 6 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it is a smoker. No. 7 While the given policyholder has a peril factor that falls below 24, so it is not reinstated. No. 8 While the given policyholder is uninsurable, so it is litigated. No. 9 While the given policyholder has a beneficiary, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 10 While the given policyholder has a claim frequency not above 72, so it is uninsurable. No. 11 While the given policyholder has a claim frequency that exceeds 72, so it has a beneficiary. No. 3 wins over No. 5. No. 1 wins over No. 7. Question: Select what holds for Yara: which option?", "options": ["is litigated", "is appraised", "is covered", "has a deductible waiver"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is covered", "unit_id": "u004233", "pair_id": "u004233-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004233-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9551783d9d3c0676", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a9", "a13", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004233-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara is indemnified. Yara has a peril factor of 0. Una has a peril factor of 10. Viggo has no rider. Yara has roadside assistance. Una has roadside assistance. Viggo has a claim frequency of 77. Yara has a rider. Yara has no flood coverage. Agata has a peril factor of 1. Agata has a claim frequency of 66.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has flood coverage, so it is reinstated. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a rider, so it is bundled. No. 3 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it is not covered. No. 4 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it is appraised. No. 5 While the given policyholder is bundled, so it is covered. No. 6 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it is a smoker. No. 7 While the given policyholder has a peril factor not below 24, so it is not reinstated. No. 8 While the given policyholder is uninsurable, so it is litigated. No. 9 While the given policyholder has a beneficiary, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 10 While the given policyholder has a claim frequency not above 72, so it is uninsurable. No. 11 While the given policyholder has a claim frequency that exceeds 72, so it has a beneficiary. No. 3 wins over No. 5. No. 1 wins over No. 7. Question: Select what holds for Yara: which option?", "options": ["is litigated", "is appraised", "is covered", "has a deductible waiver"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is covered", "unit_id": "u004233", "pair_id": "u004233-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004233-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fc378d40da2a272a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a9", "a13", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004251-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is cofunded. Nashira has a milestone total of 80. Kochab has no ethics clearance. Kochab is cofunded. Izar is exploratory. Deneb is not endorsed. Kochab has a milestone total of 74. Kochab is exploratory. Izar has a milestone total of 0. Nashira is not exploratory. Nashira is cofunded.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has no field site provided that it has no ethics clearance. Section 2: a proposal is not shortlisted provided that it is a pilot study as well as has a milestone total lower than 74 as well as is endorsed. Section 3: a proposal is a pilot study provided that it is exploratory as well as has a milestone total exceeding 57. Section 4: a proposal is shortlisted provided that it is a pilot study as well as has a milestone total of 74 or higher as well as is cofunded. Section 4 lapses for a proposal if it has a milestone total exceeding 10 as well as is endorsed. Question: Kochab is shortlisted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004251", "pair_id": "u004251-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004251-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "41897b7bc21c1350", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004251-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is cofunded. Nashira has a milestone total of 80. Kochab has no ethics clearance. Kochab is cofunded. Izar is exploratory. Deneb is not endorsed. Kochab has a milestone total of 74. Kochab is exploratory. Izar has a milestone total of 0. Nashira is not exploratory. Nashira is cofunded.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has no field site provided that it has ethics clearance. Section 2: a proposal is not shortlisted provided that it is a pilot study as well as has a milestone total lower than 74 as well as is endorsed. Section 3: a proposal is a pilot study provided that it is exploratory as well as has a milestone total exceeding 57. Section 4: a proposal is shortlisted provided that it is a pilot study as well as has a milestone total of 74 or higher as well as is cofunded. Section 4 lapses for a proposal if it has a milestone total exceeding 10 as well as is endorsed. Question: Kochab is shortlisted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004251", "pair_id": "u004251-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004251-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8143c27ee9775768", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004251-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is cofunded. Nashira has a milestone total of 80. Kochab has no ethics clearance. Kochab is cofunded. Izar is exploratory. Deneb is not endorsed. Kochab has a milestone total of 74. Kochab is exploratory. Izar has a milestone total of 0. Nashira is not exploratory. Nashira is cofunded.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has no ethics clearance: then it has no field site. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study plus has a milestone total smaller than 74 plus is endorsed: then it is not shortlisted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is exploratory plus has a milestone total higher than 57: then it is a pilot study. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study plus has a milestone total no lower than 74 plus is cofunded: then it is shortlisted. Policy IV is waived if that proposal has a milestone total higher than 10 plus is endorsed. Question: Is it so that Kochab is shortlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004251", "pair_id": "u004251-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004251-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "41897b7bc21c1350", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004251-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is cofunded. Nashira has a milestone total of 80. Kochab has no ethics clearance. Kochab is cofunded. Izar is exploratory. Deneb is not endorsed. Kochab has a milestone total of 74. Kochab is exploratory. Izar has a milestone total of 0. Nashira is not exploratory. Nashira is cofunded.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has ethics clearance: then it has no field site. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study plus has a milestone total smaller than 74 plus is endorsed: then it is not shortlisted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is exploratory plus has a milestone total higher than 57: then it is a pilot study. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study plus has a milestone total no lower than 74 plus is cofunded: then it is shortlisted. Policy IV is waived if that proposal has a milestone total higher than 10 plus is endorsed. Question: Is it so that Kochab is shortlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004251", "pair_id": "u004251-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004251-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8143c27ee9775768", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004251-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is cofunded. Nashira has a milestone total of 80. Kochab has no ethics clearance. Kochab is cofunded. Izar is exploratory. Deneb is not endorsed. Kochab has a milestone total of 74. Kochab is exploratory. Izar has a milestone total of 0. Nashira is not exploratory. Nashira is cofunded.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has no ethics clearance, it then has no field site. #2 Each time a proposal is a pilot study and additionally has a milestone total less than 74 and additionally is endorsed, it then is not shortlisted. #3 Each time a proposal is exploratory and additionally has a milestone total greater than 57, it then is a pilot study. #4 Each time a proposal is a pilot study and additionally has a milestone total of 74 or above and additionally is cofunded, it then is shortlisted. #4 is set aside if a proposal has a milestone total greater than 10 and additionally is endorsed. Question: Do the terms above show that Kochab is shortlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004251", "pair_id": "u004251-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004251-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "41897b7bc21c1350", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004251-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is cofunded. Nashira has a milestone total of 80. Kochab has no ethics clearance. Kochab is cofunded. Izar is exploratory. Deneb is not endorsed. Kochab has a milestone total of 74. Kochab is exploratory. Izar has a milestone total of 0. Nashira is not exploratory. Nashira is cofunded.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance, it then has no field site. #2 Each time a proposal is a pilot study and additionally has a milestone total less than 74 and additionally is endorsed, it then is not shortlisted. #3 Each time a proposal is exploratory and additionally has a milestone total greater than 57, it then is a pilot study. #4 Each time a proposal is a pilot study and additionally has a milestone total of 74 or above and additionally is cofunded, it then is shortlisted. #4 is set aside if a proposal has a milestone total greater than 10 and additionally is endorsed. Question: Do the terms above show that Kochab is shortlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004251", "pair_id": "u004251-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004251-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8143c27ee9775768", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004284-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is a pilot study. Nashira is not exploratory. Nashira has a review mark of 26. Gemma is interdisciplinary. Gemma is a pilot study. Gemma has a citation index of 50. Gemma is not exploratory. Gemma has a milestone total of 0. Nashira is interdisciplinary. Gemma has a review mark of 83. Nashira is collaborative. Gemma is not peer reviewed. Nashira is renewed. Nashira has a citation index of 16. Nashira is resubmitted. Gemma is not collaborative.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is multicenter provided that it is theoretical as well as has a citation index lower than 81 as well as is interdisciplinary. Section 2: a proposal is not multicenter provided that it is theoretical as well as has a citation index of 81 or higher as well as is interdisciplinary. Section 3: a proposal is not preregistered provided that it is not interdisciplinary. Section 4: a proposal has a postdoc provided that it is renewed as well as is a pilot study. Section 5: a proposal has no postdoc provided that it is resubmitted. Section 6: a proposal is preregistered provided that it is peer reviewed as well as has a review mark lower than 22 as well as has a milestone total lower than 44. Section 7: a proposal is not theoretical provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 8: a proposal is theoretical provided that it has a postdoc as well as is collaborative as well as is shortlisted. Section 7 lapses for a proposal if it is exploratory. Section 7 lapses for a proposal if it is collaborative. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Gemma is multicenter. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004284", "pair_id": "u004284-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004284-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4cc068492f5e9102", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 24}}
{"id": "syn-u004284-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is a pilot study. Nashira is not exploratory. Nashira has a review mark of 26. Gemma is interdisciplinary. Gemma is a pilot study. Gemma has a citation index of 50. Gemma is not exploratory. Gemma has a milestone total of 0. Nashira is interdisciplinary. Gemma has a review mark of 83. Nashira is collaborative. Gemma is not peer reviewed. Nashira is renewed. Nashira has a citation index of 16. Nashira is resubmitted. Gemma is not collaborative.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is multicenter provided that it is theoretical as well as has a citation index lower than 81 as well as is interdisciplinary. Section 2: a proposal is not multicenter provided that it is theoretical as well as has a citation index of 81 or higher as well as is interdisciplinary. Section 3: a proposal is not preregistered provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 4: a proposal has a postdoc provided that it is renewed as well as is a pilot study. Section 5: a proposal has no postdoc provided that it is resubmitted. Section 6: a proposal is preregistered provided that it is peer reviewed as well as has a review mark lower than 22 as well as has a milestone total lower than 44. Section 7: a proposal is not theoretical provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 8: a proposal is theoretical provided that it has a postdoc as well as is collaborative as well as is shortlisted. Section 7 lapses for a proposal if it is exploratory. Section 7 lapses for a proposal if it is collaborative. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Gemma is multicenter. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004284", "pair_id": "u004284-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004284-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "62ed68e903388f2d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 24}}
{"id": "syn-u004301-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra is a veteran. Petra has a notice period of 52. Rune is freelance. Rune has a notice period of 15. Petra is not a graduate. Petra is not freelance. Petra has a seniority step of 36. Petra is not interviewed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate has a seniority step over 37, it also is unionized. Clause 2: once any candidate has an aptitude quotient under 46, it also has a portfolio. Clause 3: once any candidate has an aptitude quotient of 46 or more, it also is relocating. Clause 4: once any candidate is onboarded, it also is not headhunted. Clause 5: once any candidate is freelance, it also is not certified. Clause 6: once any candidate is a graduate, it also is headhunted. Clause 7: once any candidate is interviewed, it also is eligible. Clause 8: once any candidate has a notice period over 86, it also is recommended. Clause 9: once any candidate is a veteran, it also is certified. Clause 10: once any candidate is freelance, it also is bonded. Clause 5 overrides Clause 9. Clause 6 overrides Clause 4. Question: Which of these is true of Petra?", "options": ["is eligible", "is bonded", "is recommended", "is certified", "is relocating", "has a portfolio", "is unionized"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is certified", "unit_id": "u004301", "pair_id": "u004301-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004301-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "649eb3b1b9f42f87", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a13", "a12", "a10", "a9", "a3", "a1", "a2"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004301-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra is a veteran. Petra has a notice period of 52. Rune is freelance. Rune has a notice period of 15. Petra is a graduate. Petra is not freelance. Petra has a seniority step of 36. Petra is not interviewed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate has a seniority step over 37, it also is unionized. Clause 2: once any candidate has an aptitude quotient under 46, it also has a portfolio. Clause 3: once any candidate has an aptitude quotient of 46 or more, it also is relocating. Clause 4: once any candidate is onboarded, it also is not headhunted. Clause 5: once any candidate is freelance, it also is not certified. Clause 6: once any candidate is a graduate, it also is headhunted. Clause 7: once any candidate is interviewed, it also is eligible. Clause 8: once any candidate has a notice period over 86, it also is recommended. Clause 9: once any candidate is a veteran, it also is certified. Clause 10: once any candidate is freelance, it also is bonded. Clause 5 overrides Clause 9. Clause 6 overrides Clause 4. Question: Which of these is true of Petra?", "options": ["is eligible", "is bonded", "is recommended", "is certified", "is relocating", "has a portfolio", "is unionized"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is certified", "unit_id": "u004301", "pair_id": "u004301-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004301-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "454bb49a864a7ac9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a13", "a12", "a10", "a9", "a3", "a1", "a2"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004308-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Edda has no adjuster. Edda has a payout ceiling of 75. Edda has a premium band of 50. Edda has flood coverage. Edda has a claim frequency of 4. Edda is covered.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is appraised and additionally is covered, it then is reimbursed. #2 Each time a policyholder is disputed, it then is appraised. #3 Each time a policyholder is appraised and additionally has an adjuster, it then is uninsurable. #4 Each time a policyholder is appraised and additionally has a premium band of 61 or below, it then is a smoker. #5 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling greater than 50, it then is disputed. #6 Each time a policyholder is appraised and additionally has a claim frequency less than 85 and additionally has a premium band less than 13, it then has a deductible waiver. #7 Each time a policyholder is appraised and additionally has a premium band greater than 61 and additionally has a rider, it then has a premium discount. #8 Each time a policyholder has flood coverage, it then is not retired. #7 is set aside if a policyholder is lapsed. #1 is set aside if a policyholder has an adjuster. #4 is set aside if a policyholder has a payout ceiling greater than 43. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Edda?", "options": ["is uninsurable", "has a deductible waiver", "is reimbursed", "is a smoker", "has a premium discount"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u004308", "pair_id": "u004308-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004308-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c72dd650fc51ed11", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a2", "a7", "a6", "a0"]}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u004308-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Edda has no adjuster. Edda has a payout ceiling of 75. Edda has a premium band of 50. Edda has no flood coverage. Edda has a claim frequency of 4. Edda is covered.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is appraised and additionally is covered, it then is reimbursed. #2 Each time a policyholder is disputed, it then is appraised. #3 Each time a policyholder is appraised and additionally has an adjuster, it then is uninsurable. #4 Each time a policyholder is appraised and additionally has a premium band of 61 or below, it then is a smoker. #5 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling greater than 50, it then is disputed. #6 Each time a policyholder is appraised and additionally has a claim frequency less than 85 and additionally has a premium band less than 13, it then has a deductible waiver. #7 Each time a policyholder is appraised and additionally has a premium band greater than 61 and additionally has a rider, it then has a premium discount. #8 Each time a policyholder has flood coverage, it then is not retired. #7 is set aside if a policyholder is lapsed. #1 is set aside if a policyholder has an adjuster. #4 is set aside if a policyholder has a payout ceiling greater than 43. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Edda?", "options": ["is uninsurable", "has a deductible waiver", "is reimbursed", "is a smoker", "has a premium discount"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u004308", "pair_id": "u004308-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004308-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9679e093586b4b9b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a2", "a7", "a6", "a0"]}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u004331-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not retired. Celeste is not inspected. Celeste has an adjuster. Agata is not retired. Agata is not reinstated. Celeste is reinstated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has a premium discount provided that it is retired. Section 2: a policyholder has a rider provided that it has a beneficiary. Section 3: a policyholder is a smoker provided that it is inspected. Section 4: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it is reinstated. Section 5: a policyholder is subrogated provided that it is a smoker. Section 6: a policyholder has a beneficiary provided that it has a deductible waiver. Section 7: a policyholder has no rider provided that it is subrogated. Section 8: a policyholder is lapsed provided that it has an adjuster. Question: Celeste has a rider. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004331", "pair_id": "u004331-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004331-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "17449a6668e05f3f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004331-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not retired. Celeste is not inspected. Celeste has an adjuster. Agata is not retired. Agata is not reinstated. Celeste is reinstated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has a premium discount provided that it is retired. Section 2: a policyholder has a rider provided that it has a beneficiary. Section 3: a policyholder is a smoker provided that it is inspected. Section 4: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it is reinstated. Section 5: a policyholder is subrogated provided that it is a smoker. Section 6: a policyholder has a beneficiary provided that it has a deductible waiver. Section 7: a policyholder has no rider provided that it is subrogated. Section 8: a policyholder is not uninsurable provided that it is reinstated. Section 9: a policyholder is lapsed provided that it has an adjuster. Question: Celeste has a rider. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004331", "pair_id": "u004331-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004331-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "e057c4648bc48250", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004379-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is bundled. Dmitri has an adjuster. Una is disputed. Una is not litigated. Una has no adjuster.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is litigated, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it is not grandfathered. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is disputed, thus it is retired. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has no adjuster, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is litigated, thus it is not retired. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Una is not retired?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004379", "pair_id": "u004379-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004379-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e728700c1bb8a4a5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u004379-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is bundled. Dmitri has an adjuster. Una is disputed. Una is not litigated. Una has no adjuster.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is litigated, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it is not grandfathered. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is disputed, thus it is retired. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has an adjuster, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is litigated, thus it is not retired. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Una is not retired?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004379", "pair_id": "u004379-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004379-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "90e244ca1c1e510d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u004379-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is bundled. Dmitri has an adjuster. Una is disputed. Una is not litigated. Una has no adjuster.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is litigated, so it is grandfathered. No. 2 While the given policyholder is bundled, so it is not grandfathered. No. 3 While the given policyholder is disputed, so it is retired. No. 4 While the given policyholder has no adjuster, so it has a premium discount. No. 5 While the given policyholder is litigated, so it is not retired. No. 2 wins over No. 1. No. 5 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Una is not retired\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004379", "pair_id": "u004379-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004379-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e728700c1bb8a4a5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u004379-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is bundled. Dmitri has an adjuster. Una is disputed. Una is not litigated. Una has no adjuster.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is litigated, so it is grandfathered. No. 2 While the given policyholder is bundled, so it is not grandfathered. No. 3 While the given policyholder is disputed, so it is retired. No. 4 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it has a premium discount. No. 5 While the given policyholder is litigated, so it is not retired. No. 2 wins over No. 1. No. 5 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Una is not retired\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004379", "pair_id": "u004379-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004379-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "90e244ca1c1e510d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u004389-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar has a test yield of 3. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is reverted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is tagged provided that it has a test yield lower than 16 as well as is reverted. Section 2: a build is not minified provided that it is not signed as well as is not notarized as well as is reverted. Section 3: a build is not compiled provided that it has no migration script. Section 4: a build is not profiled provided that it is tagged. Section 5: a build is minified provided that it is not signed as well as is notarized. Section 1 lapses for a build if it is experimental. Question: Feldspar is minified. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004389", "pair_id": "u004389-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004389-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6983a692a7301870", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004389-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar has a test yield of 3. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is reverted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is tagged provided that it has a test yield lower than 16 as well as is reverted. Section 2: a build is not minified provided that it is not signed as well as is not notarized as well as is reverted. Section 3: a build is not compiled provided that it has no migration script. Section 4: a build is not signed provided that it is tagged. Section 5: a build is not profiled provided that it is tagged. Section 6: a build is minified provided that it is not signed as well as is notarized. Section 1 lapses for a build if it is experimental. Question: Feldspar is minified. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004389", "pair_id": "u004389-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004389-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4268526b16681562", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004389-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar has a test yield of 3. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is reverted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a test yield less than 16 and additionally is reverted, it then is tagged. #2 Each time a build is not signed and additionally is not notarized and additionally is reverted, it then is not minified. #3 Each time a build has no migration script, it then is not compiled. #4 Each time a build is tagged, it then is not profiled. #5 Each time a build is not signed and additionally is notarized, it then is minified. #1 is set aside if a build is experimental. Question: Do the terms above show that Feldspar is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004389", "pair_id": "u004389-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004389-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6983a692a7301870", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004389-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar has a test yield of 3. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is reverted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a test yield less than 16 and additionally is reverted, it then is tagged. #2 Each time a build is not signed and additionally is not notarized and additionally is reverted, it then is not minified. #3 Each time a build has no migration script, it then is not compiled. #4 Each time a build is tagged, it then is not signed. #5 Each time a build is tagged, it then is not profiled. #6 Each time a build is not signed and additionally is notarized, it then is minified. #1 is set aside if a build is experimental. Question: Do the terms above show that Feldspar is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004389", "pair_id": "u004389-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004389-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4268526b16681562", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004411-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ulla is not tracked. Thilo is refrigerated. Ulla is not registered. Ulla has no barcode. Thilo is not rerouted. Thilo is not stamped. Thilo is tracked. Ulla is scanned. Ulla is rerouted. Thilo has a barcode. Ulla is hazardous. Thilo is registered. Thilo is damaged. Thilo is not scanned.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is scanned: then it is undeliverable. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is hazardous: then it has a courier. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is registered: then it is prepaid. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated: then it has no locker slot. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it has a locker slot. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it has no waybill. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is palletized. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is stamped: then it is weighed. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is damaged: then it is fragile. Policy X. Suppose that parcel is rerouted: then it has a waybill. Policy XI. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is not fragile. Policy XII. Suppose that parcel is rerouted: then it is not prepaid. Policy XIII. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is not labeled. Policy XIV. Suppose that parcel is hazardous: then it is not undeliverable. Policy VII is waived if that parcel is stamped. Policy XIII is waived if that parcel is hazardous. Policy IX is waived if that parcel is stamped. In a clash, Policy XIV beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy XI beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy XII beats Policy III. Question: Which choice is right for Thilo?", "options": ["is weighed", "is fragile", "has a courier", "has a waybill", "is undeliverable", "is prepaid"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prepaid", "unit_id": "u004411", "pair_id": "u004411-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004411-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c0f421835689f6eb", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a13", "a7", "a9", "a5", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004411-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ulla is not tracked. Thilo is not refrigerated. Ulla is not registered. Ulla has no barcode. Thilo is not rerouted. Thilo is not stamped. Thilo is tracked. Ulla is scanned. Ulla is rerouted. Thilo has a barcode. Ulla is hazardous. Thilo is registered. Thilo is damaged. Thilo is not scanned.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is scanned: then it is undeliverable. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is hazardous: then it has a courier. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is registered: then it is prepaid. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated: then it has no locker slot. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it has a locker slot. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it has no waybill. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is palletized. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is stamped: then it is weighed. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is damaged: then it is fragile. Policy X. Suppose that parcel is rerouted: then it has a waybill. Policy XI. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is not fragile. Policy XII. Suppose that parcel is rerouted: then it is not prepaid. Policy XIII. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is not labeled. Policy XIV. Suppose that parcel is hazardous: then it is not undeliverable. Policy VII is waived if that parcel is stamped. Policy XIII is waived if that parcel is hazardous. Policy IX is waived if that parcel is stamped. In a clash, Policy XIV beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy XI beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy XII beats Policy III. Question: Which choice is right for Thilo?", "options": ["is weighed", "is fragile", "has a courier", "has a waybill", "is undeliverable", "is prepaid"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prepaid", "unit_id": "u004411", "pair_id": "u004411-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004411-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cbe5dc11a6f80e84", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a13", "a7", "a9", "a5", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004411-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ulla is not tracked. Thilo is refrigerated. Ulla is not registered. Ulla has no barcode. Thilo is not rerouted. Thilo is not stamped. Thilo is tracked. Ulla is scanned. Ulla is rerouted. Thilo has a barcode. Ulla is hazardous. Thilo is registered. Thilo is damaged. Thilo is not scanned.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is scanned, it then is undeliverable. #2 Each time a parcel is hazardous, it then has a courier. #3 Each time a parcel is registered, it then is prepaid. #4 Each time a parcel is refrigerated, it then has no locker slot. #5 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then has a locker slot. #6 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then has no waybill. #7 Each time a parcel is tracked, it then is palletized. #8 Each time a parcel is stamped, it then is weighed. #9 Each time a parcel is damaged, it then is fragile. #10 Each time a parcel is rerouted, it then has a waybill. #11 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is not fragile. #12 Each time a parcel is rerouted, it then is not prepaid. #13 Each time a parcel is tracked, it then is not labeled. #14 Each time a parcel is hazardous, it then is not undeliverable. #7 is set aside if a parcel is stamped. #13 is set aside if a parcel is hazardous. #9 is set aside if a parcel is stamped. #1 yields to #14. #5 yields to #4. #6 yields to #10. #9 yields to #11. #3 yields to #12. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Thilo?", "options": ["is weighed", "is fragile", "has a courier", "has a waybill", "is undeliverable", "is prepaid"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prepaid", "unit_id": "u004411", "pair_id": "u004411-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004411-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c0f421835689f6eb", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a13", "a7", "a9", "a5", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004411-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ulla is not tracked. Thilo is not refrigerated. Ulla is not registered. Ulla has no barcode. Thilo is not rerouted. Thilo is not stamped. Thilo is tracked. Ulla is scanned. Ulla is rerouted. Thilo has a barcode. Ulla is hazardous. Thilo is registered. Thilo is damaged. Thilo is not scanned.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is scanned, it then is undeliverable. #2 Each time a parcel is hazardous, it then has a courier. #3 Each time a parcel is registered, it then is prepaid. #4 Each time a parcel is refrigerated, it then has no locker slot. #5 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then has a locker slot. #6 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then has no waybill. #7 Each time a parcel is tracked, it then is palletized. #8 Each time a parcel is stamped, it then is weighed. #9 Each time a parcel is damaged, it then is fragile. #10 Each time a parcel is rerouted, it then has a waybill. #11 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is not fragile. #12 Each time a parcel is rerouted, it then is not prepaid. #13 Each time a parcel is tracked, it then is not labeled. #14 Each time a parcel is hazardous, it then is not undeliverable. #7 is set aside if a parcel is stamped. #13 is set aside if a parcel is hazardous. #9 is set aside if a parcel is stamped. #1 yields to #14. #5 yields to #4. #6 yields to #10. #9 yields to #11. #3 yields to #12. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Thilo?", "options": ["is weighed", "is fragile", "has a courier", "has a waybill", "is undeliverable", "is prepaid"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prepaid", "unit_id": "u004411", "pair_id": "u004411-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004411-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cbe5dc11a6f80e84", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a13", "a7", "a9", "a5", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004427-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a notice period of 54. Noor has no mentor. Noor has a notice period of 61. Teodor has a notice period of 86. Noor is not probationary. Olek has a mentor. Olek is not probationary. Teodor is headhunted. Olek is recommended. Olek is not headhunted.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is recommended, then it is fingerprinted. (2) If a candidate has a portfolio, then it is onboarded. (3) If a candidate is fingerprinted, then it has a visa. (4) If a candidate is probationary, then it is a veteran. (5) If a candidate is recommended, then it is not fingerprinted. (1) is void if the candidate has a notice period of at least 19. (1) is void if the candidate has no portfolio. (5) is void if the candidate is headhunted. (5) is void if the candidate has no mentor. Question: Is it true that Olek is fingerprinted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004427", "pair_id": "u004427-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004427-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8469bb6698c734f2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u004427-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a notice period of 54. Noor has no mentor. Noor has a notice period of 61. Teodor has a notice period of 86. Noor is not probationary. Olek has no mentor. Olek is not probationary. Teodor is headhunted. Olek is recommended. Olek is not headhunted.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is recommended, then it is fingerprinted. (2) If a candidate has a portfolio, then it is onboarded. (3) If a candidate is fingerprinted, then it has a visa. (4) If a candidate is probationary, then it is a veteran. (5) If a candidate is recommended, then it is not fingerprinted. (1) is void if the candidate has a notice period of at least 19. (1) is void if the candidate has no portfolio. (5) is void if the candidate is headhunted. (5) is void if the candidate has no mentor. Question: Is it true that Olek is fingerprinted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004427", "pair_id": "u004427-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004427-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3428940e805ba28b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u004427-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a notice period of 54. Noor has no mentor. Noor has a notice period of 61. Teodor has a notice period of 86. Noor is not probationary. Olek has a mentor. Olek is not probationary. Teodor is headhunted. Olek is recommended. Olek is not headhunted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is recommended, it also is fingerprinted. Clause 2: once any candidate has a portfolio, it also is onboarded. Clause 3: once any candidate is fingerprinted, it also has a visa. Clause 4: once any candidate is probationary, it also is a veteran. Clause 5: once any candidate is recommended, it also is not fingerprinted. Clause 1 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has a notice period of 19 or more. Clause 1 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has no portfolio. Clause 5 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is headhunted. Clause 5 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has no mentor. Question: Does it follow that Olek is fingerprinted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004427", "pair_id": "u004427-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004427-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8469bb6698c734f2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u004427-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a notice period of 54. Noor has no mentor. Noor has a notice period of 61. Teodor has a notice period of 86. Noor is not probationary. Olek has no mentor. Olek is not probationary. Teodor is headhunted. Olek is recommended. Olek is not headhunted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is recommended, it also is fingerprinted. Clause 2: once any candidate has a portfolio, it also is onboarded. Clause 3: once any candidate is fingerprinted, it also has a visa. Clause 4: once any candidate is probationary, it also is a veteran. Clause 5: once any candidate is recommended, it also is not fingerprinted. Clause 1 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has a notice period of 19 or more. Clause 1 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has no portfolio. Clause 5 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is headhunted. Clause 5 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has no mentor. Question: Does it follow that Olek is fingerprinted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004427", "pair_id": "u004427-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004427-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3428940e805ba28b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u004434-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is not grandfathered. Dmitri is not bundled.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is subrogated, it thereby is lapsed. Point B. If said policyholder is inspected, it thereby is indemnified. Point C. If said policyholder is not grandfathered, it thereby is a smoker. Point D. If said policyholder is bundled, it thereby has roadside assistance. Point E. If said policyholder is inspected, it thereby is reinstated. Point F. If said policyholder is grandfathered, it thereby has no adjuster. Point G. If said policyholder has no adjuster, it thereby is inspected. Point H. If said policyholder is a smoker, it thereby is subrogated. Question: Which choice is true for Dmitri?", "options": ["is lapsed", "is reinstated"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is lapsed", "unit_id": "u004434", "pair_id": "u004434-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004434-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "7260d79d0865aea1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004434-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is grandfathered. Dmitri is not bundled.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is subrogated, it thereby is lapsed. Point B. If said policyholder is inspected, it thereby is indemnified. Point C. If said policyholder is not grandfathered, it thereby is a smoker. Point D. If said policyholder is bundled, it thereby has roadside assistance. Point E. If said policyholder is inspected, it thereby is reinstated. Point F. If said policyholder is grandfathered, it thereby has no adjuster. Point G. If said policyholder has no adjuster, it thereby is inspected. Point H. If said policyholder is a smoker, it thereby is subrogated. Question: Which choice is true for Dmitri?", "options": ["is lapsed", "is reinstated"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reinstated", "unit_id": "u004434", "pair_id": "u004434-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004434-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "5e1dac74ecdff309", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004434-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is not grandfathered. Dmitri is not bundled.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is subrogated, so it is lapsed. No. 2 While the given policyholder is inspected, so it is indemnified. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not grandfathered, so it is a smoker. No. 4 While the given policyholder is bundled, so it has roadside assistance. No. 5 While the given policyholder is inspected, so it is reinstated. No. 6 While the given policyholder is grandfathered, so it has no adjuster. No. 7 While the given policyholder has no adjuster, so it is inspected. No. 8 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it is subrogated. Question: Select what holds for Dmitri: which option?", "options": ["is lapsed", "is reinstated"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is lapsed", "unit_id": "u004434", "pair_id": "u004434-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004434-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "7260d79d0865aea1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004434-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is grandfathered. Dmitri is not bundled.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is subrogated, so it is lapsed. No. 2 While the given policyholder is inspected, so it is indemnified. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not grandfathered, so it is a smoker. No. 4 While the given policyholder is bundled, so it has roadside assistance. No. 5 While the given policyholder is inspected, so it is reinstated. No. 6 While the given policyholder is grandfathered, so it has no adjuster. No. 7 While the given policyholder has no adjuster, so it is inspected. No. 8 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it is subrogated. Question: Select what holds for Dmitri: which option?", "options": ["is lapsed", "is reinstated"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reinstated", "unit_id": "u004434", "pair_id": "u004434-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004434-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "5e1dac74ecdff309", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004438-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is not backported. Obsidian is linted. Quartz is flaky. Obsidian is flaky. Galena has no changelog. Galena is flaky. Quartz is backported.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is backported and further is tested, it thereby is obsolete. Point B. If said build has a changelog, it thereby is versioned. Point C. If said build is not flaky, it thereby is not obsolete. Point D. If said build is signed and further is flaky, it thereby is not documented. Point E. If said build is backported, it thereby is signed. Point F. If said build is linted, it thereby is not versioned. Point G. If said build is signed and further is backported, it thereby is documented. Point C supersedes Point A. Point D supersedes Point G. Point F supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Obsidian is documented. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004438", "pair_id": "u004438-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004438-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bb95e49ce8f9677e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004438-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is not backported. Obsidian is linted. Quartz is flaky. Obsidian is flaky. Galena has no changelog. Galena is flaky. Quartz is backported.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is backported and further is tested, it thereby is obsolete. Point B. If said build has a changelog, it thereby is versioned. Point C. If said build is flaky, it thereby is not obsolete. Point D. If said build is signed and further is flaky, it thereby is not documented. Point E. If said build is backported, it thereby is signed. Point F. If said build is linted, it thereby is not versioned. Point G. If said build is signed and further is backported, it thereby is documented. Point C supersedes Point A. Point D supersedes Point G. Point F supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Obsidian is documented. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004438", "pair_id": "u004438-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004438-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cb5baca78706f0b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004438-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is not backported. Obsidian is linted. Quartz is flaky. Obsidian is flaky. Galena has no changelog. Galena is flaky. Quartz is backported.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is backported and likewise is tested, so it is obsolete. No. 2 While the given build has a changelog, so it is versioned. No. 3 While the given build is not flaky, so it is not obsolete. No. 4 While the given build is signed and likewise is flaky, so it is not documented. No. 5 While the given build is backported, so it is signed. No. 6 While the given build is linted, so it is not versioned. No. 7 While the given build is signed and likewise is backported, so it is documented. No. 3 wins over No. 1. No. 4 wins over No. 7. No. 6 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Obsidian is documented\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004438", "pair_id": "u004438-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004438-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bb95e49ce8f9677e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004438-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is not backported. Obsidian is linted. Quartz is flaky. Obsidian is flaky. Galena has no changelog. Galena is flaky. Quartz is backported.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is backported and likewise is tested, so it is obsolete. No. 2 While the given build has a changelog, so it is versioned. No. 3 While the given build is flaky, so it is not obsolete. No. 4 While the given build is signed and likewise is flaky, so it is not documented. No. 5 While the given build is backported, so it is signed. No. 6 While the given build is linted, so it is not versioned. No. 7 While the given build is signed and likewise is backported, so it is documented. No. 3 wins over No. 1. No. 4 wins over No. 7. No. 6 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Obsidian is documented\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004438", "pair_id": "u004438-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004438-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cb5baca78706f0b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004456-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia has no waybill. Liesel has a delivery window of 16. Kaveh has no waybill. Kaveh has a delivery window of 28. Kaveh is sealed. Kaveh has a weight class of 37. Saskia has a weight class of 37. Jory has a waybill. Saskia has a postal zone of 84. Liesel has a postal zone of 27. Saskia has a delivery window of 99. Jory has a delivery window of 68.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is rerouted, then it is tracked. (2) If a parcel is registered, then it is damaged. (3) If a parcel has a waybill, then it is not scanned. (4) If a parcel has a postal zone of at most 15, then it is scanned. (5) If a parcel is weighed, then it is rerouted. (6) If a parcel has a weight class of at least 36, then it is weighed. (7) If a parcel has a weight class below 36, then it is consolidated. (8) If a parcel has a waybill, then it is not consolidated. (9) If a parcel has a weight class above 61, then it is perishable. (10) If a parcel has a delivery window of at least 47, then it is fragile. (11) If a parcel is scanned, then it is refrigerated. (12) If a parcel has a waybill, then it is not rerouted. (13) If a parcel is consolidated, then it is registered. (14) If a parcel is sealed, then it is not perishable. (15) If a parcel is refrigerated, then it is undeliverable. When (12) and (5) clash, (12) prevails. When (4) and (3) clash, (4) prevails. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. When (9) and (14) clash, (9) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Saskia?", "options": ["is undeliverable", "is tracked", "is damaged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u004456", "pair_id": "u004456-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004456-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f96bce13b010f366", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a9", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004456-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia has no waybill. Liesel has a delivery window of 16. Kaveh has no waybill. Kaveh has a delivery window of 28. Kaveh is sealed. Kaveh has a weight class of 37. Saskia has a weight class of 25. Jory has a waybill. Saskia has a postal zone of 84. Liesel has a postal zone of 27. Saskia has a delivery window of 99. Jory has a delivery window of 68.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is rerouted, then it is tracked. (2) If a parcel is registered, then it is damaged. (3) If a parcel has a waybill, then it is not scanned. (4) If a parcel has a postal zone of at most 15, then it is scanned. (5) If a parcel is weighed, then it is rerouted. (6) If a parcel has a weight class of at least 36, then it is weighed. (7) If a parcel has a weight class below 36, then it is consolidated. (8) If a parcel has a waybill, then it is not consolidated. (9) If a parcel has a weight class above 61, then it is perishable. (10) If a parcel has a delivery window of at least 47, then it is fragile. (11) If a parcel is scanned, then it is refrigerated. (12) If a parcel has a waybill, then it is not rerouted. (13) If a parcel is consolidated, then it is registered. (14) If a parcel is sealed, then it is not perishable. (15) If a parcel is refrigerated, then it is undeliverable. When (12) and (5) clash, (12) prevails. When (4) and (3) clash, (4) prevails. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. When (9) and (14) clash, (9) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Saskia?", "options": ["is undeliverable", "is tracked", "is damaged"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is damaged", "unit_id": "u004456", "pair_id": "u004456-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004456-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "30872824449a1b84", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a9", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004467-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is a claimant. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo is inspected. Viggo has a dashcam. Yara is not a claimant. Yara has a dashcam. Viggo is not indemnified. Viggo is a smoker. Yara is not inspected. Viggo is subrogated. Viggo is not reimbursed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is not uninsurable provided that it is reinstated. Section 2: a policyholder is grandfathered provided that it is reimbursed as well as is inspected. Section 3: a policyholder is not litigated provided that it is covered as well as is inspected as well as has a dashcam. Section 4: a policyholder is not covered provided that it is a claimant as well as is reimbursed. Section 5: a policyholder is covered provided that it is a claimant as well as is reinstated. Section 6: a policyholder is uninsurable provided that it is reimbursed. Section 7: a policyholder is disputed provided that it is indemnified as well as is a smoker. Section 8: a policyholder is litigated provided that it is not covered as well as is subrogated as well as has a dashcam. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Viggo is litigated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004467", "pair_id": "u004467-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004467-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a36871e3a84f3622", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004467-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is a claimant. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo is inspected. Viggo has a dashcam. Yara is not a claimant. Yara has a dashcam. Viggo is not indemnified. Viggo is a smoker. Yara is not inspected. Viggo is subrogated. Viggo is not reimbursed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is not uninsurable provided that it is reinstated. Section 2: a policyholder is grandfathered provided that it is reimbursed as well as is inspected. Section 3: a policyholder is not litigated provided that it is covered as well as is inspected as well as has a dashcam. Section 4: a policyholder is not covered provided that it is a claimant as well as is reimbursed. Section 5: a policyholder is covered provided that it is a claimant as well as is reinstated. Section 6: a policyholder is uninsurable provided that it is reimbursed. Section 7: a policyholder is disputed provided that it is indemnified as well as is a smoker. Section 8: a policyholder is litigated provided that it is covered as well as is subrogated as well as has a dashcam. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Viggo is litigated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004467", "pair_id": "u004467-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004467-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec67a57179306360", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004467-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is a claimant. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo is inspected. Viggo has a dashcam. Yara is not a claimant. Yara has a dashcam. Viggo is not indemnified. Viggo is a smoker. Yara is not inspected. Viggo is subrogated. Viggo is not reimbursed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is reinstated: then it is not uninsurable. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed plus is inspected: then it is grandfathered. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is covered plus is inspected plus has a dashcam: then it is not litigated. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is a claimant plus is reimbursed: then it is not covered. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is a claimant plus is reinstated: then it is covered. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed: then it is uninsurable. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified plus is a smoker: then it is disputed. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder is not covered plus is subrogated plus has a dashcam: then it is litigated. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Viggo is litigated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004467", "pair_id": "u004467-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004467-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a36871e3a84f3622", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004467-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is a claimant. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo is inspected. Viggo has a dashcam. Yara is not a claimant. Yara has a dashcam. Viggo is not indemnified. Viggo is a smoker. Yara is not inspected. Viggo is subrogated. Viggo is not reimbursed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is reinstated: then it is not uninsurable. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed plus is inspected: then it is grandfathered. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is covered plus is inspected plus has a dashcam: then it is not litigated. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is a claimant plus is reimbursed: then it is not covered. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is a claimant plus is reinstated: then it is covered. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed: then it is uninsurable. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified plus is a smoker: then it is disputed. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder is covered plus is subrogated plus has a dashcam: then it is litigated. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Viggo is litigated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004467", "pair_id": "u004467-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004467-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec67a57179306360", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004467-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is a claimant. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo is inspected. Viggo has a dashcam. Yara is not a claimant. Yara has a dashcam. Viggo is not indemnified. Viggo is a smoker. Yara is not inspected. Viggo is subrogated. Viggo is not reimbursed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is reinstated, it then is not uninsurable. #2 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed and additionally is inspected, it then is grandfathered. #3 Each time a policyholder is covered and additionally is inspected and additionally has a dashcam, it then is not litigated. #4 Each time a policyholder is a claimant and additionally is reimbursed, it then is not covered. #5 Each time a policyholder is a claimant and additionally is reinstated, it then is covered. #6 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then is uninsurable. #7 Each time a policyholder is indemnified and additionally is a smoker, it then is disputed. #8 Each time a policyholder is not covered and additionally is subrogated and additionally has a dashcam, it then is litigated. #5 yields to #4. #3 yields to #8. #1 yields to #6. Question: Do the terms above show that Viggo is litigated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004467", "pair_id": "u004467-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004467-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a36871e3a84f3622", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004467-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is a claimant. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo is inspected. Viggo has a dashcam. Yara is not a claimant. Yara has a dashcam. Viggo is not indemnified. Viggo is a smoker. Yara is not inspected. Viggo is subrogated. Viggo is not reimbursed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is reinstated, it then is not uninsurable. #2 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed and additionally is inspected, it then is grandfathered. #3 Each time a policyholder is covered and additionally is inspected and additionally has a dashcam, it then is not litigated. #4 Each time a policyholder is a claimant and additionally is reimbursed, it then is not covered. #5 Each time a policyholder is a claimant and additionally is reinstated, it then is covered. #6 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then is uninsurable. #7 Each time a policyholder is indemnified and additionally is a smoker, it then is disputed. #8 Each time a policyholder is covered and additionally is subrogated and additionally has a dashcam, it then is litigated. #5 yields to #4. #3 yields to #8. #1 yields to #6. Question: Do the terms above show that Viggo is litigated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004467", "pair_id": "u004467-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004467-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec67a57179306360", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004493-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mads is not probationary. Mads is not a graduate. Ivo is not a graduate. Ivo is not probationary.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not headhunted provided that it is probationary. Section 2: a candidate is unionized provided that it is probationary. Section 3: a candidate has a visa provided that it is not probationary. Section 4: a candidate has a mentor provided that it is not headhunted. Section 5: a candidate is not certified provided that it is not a graduate. Section 6: a candidate is freelance provided that it has a visa. Question: Which statement fits Mads?", "options": ["is freelance", "has a mentor"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is freelance", "unit_id": "u004493", "pair_id": "u004493-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004493-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "b6c781e9fdce8201", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a7"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004493-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mads is probationary. Mads is not a graduate. Ivo is not a graduate. Ivo is not probationary.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not headhunted provided that it is probationary. Section 2: a candidate is unionized provided that it is probationary. Section 3: a candidate has a visa provided that it is not probationary. Section 4: a candidate has a mentor provided that it is not headhunted. Section 5: a candidate is not certified provided that it is not a graduate. Section 6: a candidate is freelance provided that it has a visa. Question: Which statement fits Mads?", "options": ["is freelance", "has a mentor"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a mentor", "unit_id": "u004493", "pair_id": "u004493-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004493-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "964b1f287121bc5c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a7"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004547-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not creditworthy. Folke has a guarantor. Folke is prequalified. Folke has no mortgage.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower has a mortgage, that borrower is not refinanced. Item B. When the borrower is bankrupt, that borrower is refinanced. Item C. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower has no collateral. Item D. When the borrower is indebted, that borrower is overdrawn. Item E. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower has collateral. Item F. When the borrower is bankrupt, that borrower has no lien. Item G. When the borrower is prequalified, that borrower is not indebted. Item H. When the borrower is bankrupt, that borrower is a depositor. Item I. When the borrower is creditworthy, that borrower is audited. Item J. When the borrower is audited, that borrower is not overdrawn. Item K. When the borrower is prequalified, that borrower is indebted. Item C is suspended when the borrower has a guarantor. Item C is suspended when the borrower is foreclosed. Item E is suspended when the borrower is a homeowner. Item E outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item A. Item K outranks Item G. Item J outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Folke has no collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004547", "pair_id": "u004547-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004547-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "32724aa82d85bd89", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004547-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not creditworthy. Folke has a guarantor. Folke is prequalified. Folke has no mortgage. Folke is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower has a mortgage, that borrower is not refinanced. Item B. When the borrower is bankrupt, that borrower is refinanced. Item C. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower has no collateral. Item D. When the borrower is indebted, that borrower is overdrawn. Item E. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower has collateral. Item F. When the borrower is bankrupt, that borrower has no lien. Item G. When the borrower is prequalified, that borrower is not indebted. Item H. When the borrower is bankrupt, that borrower is a depositor. Item I. When the borrower is creditworthy, that borrower is audited. Item J. When the borrower is audited, that borrower is not overdrawn. Item K. When the borrower is prequalified, that borrower is indebted. Item C is suspended when the borrower has a guarantor. Item C is suspended when the borrower is foreclosed. Item E is suspended when the borrower is a homeowner. Item E outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item A. Item K outranks Item G. Item J outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Folke has no collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004547", "pair_id": "u004547-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004547-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a7116c175d47078d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004548-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Liesel is registered. Liesel has a barcode. Liesel has a locker slot. Liesel is hazardous. Liesel is not tracked. Liesel is palletized.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is registered plus is hazardous: then it is sealed. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is palletized: then it is not scanned. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is hazardous: then it is not delayed. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is registered plus has a locker slot plus is palletized: then it is delayed. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it is scanned. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is tracked plus has a barcode: then it is stamped. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy V. Question: Which choice is right for Liesel?", "options": ["is sealed", "is delayed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sealed", "unit_id": "u004548", "pair_id": "u004548-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004548-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8819c95c5bff4266", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a7"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004548-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Liesel is registered. Liesel has a barcode. Liesel has a locker slot. Liesel is not hazardous. Liesel is not tracked. Liesel is palletized.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is registered plus is hazardous: then it is sealed. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is palletized: then it is not scanned. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is hazardous: then it is not delayed. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is registered plus has a locker slot plus is palletized: then it is delayed. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it is scanned. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is tracked plus has a barcode: then it is stamped. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy V. Question: Which choice is right for Liesel?", "options": ["is sealed", "is delayed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is delayed", "unit_id": "u004548", "pair_id": "u004548-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004548-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "87fdc6fc94823964", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a7"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004571-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk has a mortgage. Hamid has a mortgage. Hamid has a debt ratio of 35. Hamid is not underwritten. Anouk has a risk tier of 18. Hamid is creditworthy. Anouk has a repayment grade of 28. Anouk has a credit rating of 23. Hamid has a credit rating of 64. Anouk has a debt ratio of 68.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is underwritten, thus it is amortized. Provision 2: when the borrower here is creditworthy, thus it is prequalified. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a mortgage, thus it has no lien. Provision 4: when the borrower here has a credit rating at or below 33, thus it is employed. Provision 5: when the borrower here has a debt ratio beyond 80, thus it is garnished. Provision 6: when the borrower here has a risk tier beneath 48, thus it has a cosigner. Provision 7: when the borrower here is not creditworthy, thus it has collateral. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here has a repayment grade beneath 25. Provision 4 has no effect when the borrower here is underwritten. Provision 7 has no effect when the borrower here has a risk tier beyond 36. Question: Which one describes Hamid?", "options": ["is garnished", "is amortized", "is employed", "is prequalified", "has collateral", "has a cosigner"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prequalified", "unit_id": "u004571", "pair_id": "u004571-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004571-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b1eedc58f65f8f76", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a6", "a1", "a0", "a5", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004571-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk has a mortgage. Hamid has a mortgage. Hamid has a debt ratio of 35. Hamid is not underwritten. Anouk has a risk tier of 18. Hamid is not creditworthy. Anouk has a repayment grade of 28. Anouk has a credit rating of 23. Hamid has a credit rating of 64. Anouk has a debt ratio of 68.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is underwritten, thus it is amortized. Provision 2: when the borrower here is creditworthy, thus it is prequalified. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a mortgage, thus it has no lien. Provision 4: when the borrower here has a credit rating at or below 33, thus it is employed. Provision 5: when the borrower here has a debt ratio beyond 80, thus it is garnished. Provision 6: when the borrower here has a risk tier beneath 48, thus it has a cosigner. Provision 7: when the borrower here is not creditworthy, thus it has collateral. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here has a repayment grade beneath 25. Provision 4 has no effect when the borrower here is underwritten. Provision 7 has no effect when the borrower here has a risk tier beyond 36. Question: Which one describes Hamid?", "options": ["is garnished", "is amortized", "is employed", "is prequalified", "has collateral", "has a cosigner"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u004571", "pair_id": "u004571-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004571-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8bacfd7594633609", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a6", "a1", "a0", "a5", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004571-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk has a mortgage. Hamid has a mortgage. Hamid has a debt ratio of 35. Hamid is not underwritten. Anouk has a risk tier of 18. Hamid is creditworthy. Anouk has a repayment grade of 28. Anouk has a credit rating of 23. Hamid has a credit rating of 64. Anouk has a debt ratio of 68.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is underwritten, it thereby is amortized. Point B. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is prequalified. Point C. If said borrower has a mortgage, it thereby has no lien. Point D. If said borrower has a credit rating of maximum 33, it thereby is employed. Point E. If said borrower has a debt ratio in excess of 80, it thereby is garnished. Point F. If said borrower has a risk tier short of 48, it thereby has a cosigner. Point G. If said borrower is not creditworthy, it thereby has collateral. Point C is cancelled if said borrower has a repayment grade short of 25. Point D is cancelled if said borrower is underwritten. Point G is cancelled if said borrower has a risk tier in excess of 36. Question: Which choice is true for Hamid?", "options": ["is garnished", "is amortized", "is employed", "is prequalified", "has collateral", "has a cosigner"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prequalified", "unit_id": "u004571", "pair_id": "u004571-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004571-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b1eedc58f65f8f76", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a6", "a1", "a0", "a5", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004571-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk has a mortgage. Hamid has a mortgage. Hamid has a debt ratio of 35. Hamid is not underwritten. Anouk has a risk tier of 18. Hamid is not creditworthy. Anouk has a repayment grade of 28. Anouk has a credit rating of 23. Hamid has a credit rating of 64. Anouk has a debt ratio of 68.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is underwritten, it thereby is amortized. Point B. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is prequalified. Point C. If said borrower has a mortgage, it thereby has no lien. Point D. If said borrower has a credit rating of maximum 33, it thereby is employed. Point E. If said borrower has a debt ratio in excess of 80, it thereby is garnished. Point F. If said borrower has a risk tier short of 48, it thereby has a cosigner. Point G. If said borrower is not creditworthy, it thereby has collateral. Point C is cancelled if said borrower has a repayment grade short of 25. Point D is cancelled if said borrower is underwritten. Point G is cancelled if said borrower has a risk tier in excess of 36. Question: Which choice is true for Hamid?", "options": ["is garnished", "is amortized", "is employed", "is prequalified", "has collateral", "has a cosigner"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u004571", "pair_id": "u004571-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004571-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8bacfd7594633609", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a6", "a1", "a0", "a5", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004580-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is indemnified. Agata has a claim frequency of 87. Agata is not disputed. Agata has a premium band of 94. Agata has no beneficiary. Agata is a claimant. Agata is grandfathered.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a claim frequency at or above 86, thus it has flood coverage. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has flood coverage while has no beneficiary while is indemnified, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is grandfathered, thus it is reinstated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is covered. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a premium discount while has a claim frequency at or below 87 while is a claimant, thus it is not a smoker. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has a premium discount while has a claim frequency beyond 87 while is disputed, thus it is a smoker. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here is a claimant while has a claim frequency at or below 51. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here has a claim frequency beneath 94. Question: Would it be right to say that Agata is a smoker?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004580", "pair_id": "u004580-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004580-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "42eae9d47aab7385", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004580-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is indemnified. Agata has a claim frequency of 87. Agata is not disputed. Agata has a premium band of 94. Agata has no beneficiary. Agata is a claimant. Agata is grandfathered.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a claim frequency at or above 86, thus it has flood coverage. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has flood coverage while has no beneficiary while is indemnified, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is grandfathered, thus it is reinstated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is covered. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a premium discount while has a claim frequency at or below 87 while is a claimant, thus it is not a smoker. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has a premium discount while has a claim frequency beyond 87 while is disputed, thus it is a smoker. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here is a claimant while has a claim frequency at or below 51. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here has a claim frequency beneath 77. Question: Would it be right to say that Agata is a smoker?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004580", "pair_id": "u004580-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004580-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "85dae10bd584b16b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004589-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not profiled. Schist is merged. Pumice is not linted. Pumice is tagged. Schist is tagged.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it has no changelog. Policy II. Suppose that build is not merged: then it is versioned. Policy III. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is reproducible. Policy IV. Suppose that build has no changelog: then it is compiled. Policy V. Suppose that build has no changelog: then it is not compiled. Policy IV is waived if that build is profiled. Policy II is waived if that build is not tagged. Policy III is waived if that build is linted. Policy V is waived if that build is not profiled. Question: Is it so that Schist is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004589", "pair_id": "u004589-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004589-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "80ffdd33a3e94d33", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u004589-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is experimental. Schist is not profiled. Schist is merged. Pumice is not linted. Pumice is tagged. Schist is tagged.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it has no changelog. Policy II. Suppose that build is not merged: then it is versioned. Policy III. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is reproducible. Policy IV. Suppose that build has no changelog: then it is compiled. Policy V. Suppose that build has no changelog: then it is not compiled. Policy IV is waived if that build is profiled. Policy II is waived if that build is not tagged. Policy III is waived if that build is linted. Policy V is waived if that build is not profiled. Question: Is it so that Schist is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004589", "pair_id": "u004589-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004589-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ce074dbe6d19748b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u004600-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren has a guarantor. Folke has a debt ratio of 32. Hamid is prequalified. Folke is foreclosed. Folke has a risk tier of 28. Folke has no guarantor. Evren is not amortized. Folke has a credit rating of 67. Hamid is amortized. Ilse has a risk tier of 98. Hamid has a risk tier of 42. Folke is audited. Hamid has a credit rating of 16. Folke has a repayment grade of 86. Evren has a credit rating of 84.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it has a debt ratio exceeding 75. Section 2: a borrower has no mortgage provided that it is not underwritten. Section 3: a borrower is garnished provided that it is not foreclosed. Section 4: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it has a guarantor. Section 5: a borrower is solvent provided that it has no collateral. Section 6: a borrower is overdrawn provided that it has a repayment grade lower than 16. Section 7: a borrower is not garnished provided that it has a risk tier of 29 or higher. Section 8: a borrower is bankrupt provided that it has a debt ratio of 75 or lower. Section 9: a borrower is not bankrupt provided that it has a credit rating of 51 or lower. Section 10: a borrower is pensioned provided that it is amortized. Section 11: a borrower is a depositor provided that it has collateral. Section 8 lapses for a borrower if it is not audited. Section 10 lapses for a borrower if it is not foreclosed. Section 6 lapses for a borrower if it is not foreclosed. Section 4 lapses for a borrower if it is amortized. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it is not prequalified. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Which statement fits Folke?", "options": ["is a depositor", "is bankrupt", "is overdrawn", "is pensioned", "is garnished", "has an escrow account", "is a homeowner", "is solvent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bankrupt", "unit_id": "u004600", "pair_id": "u004600-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004600-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "85fbb067e9070572", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a6", "a11", "a5", "a9", "a15", "a17", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004600-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren has a guarantor. Folke has a debt ratio of 32. Hamid is prequalified. Folke is foreclosed. Folke has a risk tier of 90. Folke has no guarantor. Evren is not amortized. Folke has a credit rating of 67. Hamid is amortized. Ilse has a risk tier of 98. Hamid has a risk tier of 42. Folke is audited. Hamid has a credit rating of 16. Folke has a repayment grade of 86. Evren has a credit rating of 84.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it has a debt ratio exceeding 75. Section 2: a borrower has no mortgage provided that it is not underwritten. Section 3: a borrower is garnished provided that it is not foreclosed. Section 4: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it has a guarantor. Section 5: a borrower is solvent provided that it has no collateral. Section 6: a borrower is overdrawn provided that it has a repayment grade lower than 16. Section 7: a borrower is not garnished provided that it has a risk tier of 29 or higher. Section 8: a borrower is bankrupt provided that it has a debt ratio of 75 or lower. Section 9: a borrower is not bankrupt provided that it has a credit rating of 51 or lower. Section 10: a borrower is pensioned provided that it is amortized. Section 11: a borrower is a depositor provided that it has collateral. Section 8 lapses for a borrower if it is not audited. Section 10 lapses for a borrower if it is not foreclosed. Section 6 lapses for a borrower if it is not foreclosed. Section 4 lapses for a borrower if it is amortized. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it is not prequalified. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Which statement fits Folke?", "options": ["is a depositor", "is bankrupt", "is overdrawn", "is pensioned", "is garnished", "has an escrow account", "is a homeowner", "is solvent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bankrupt", "unit_id": "u004600", "pair_id": "u004600-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004600-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "60a6e106c04188a7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a6", "a11", "a5", "a9", "a15", "a17", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004600-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren has a guarantor. Folke has a debt ratio of 32. Hamid is prequalified. Folke is foreclosed. Folke has a risk tier of 28. Folke has no guarantor. Evren is not amortized. Folke has a credit rating of 67. Hamid is amortized. Ilse has a risk tier of 98. Hamid has a risk tier of 42. Folke is audited. Hamid has a credit rating of 16. Folke has a repayment grade of 86. Evren has a credit rating of 84.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has a debt ratio higher than 75: then it has an escrow account. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is not underwritten: then it has no mortgage. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is not foreclosed: then it is garnished. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a guarantor: then it is a homeowner. Policy V. Suppose that borrower has no collateral: then it is solvent. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower has a repayment grade smaller than 16: then it is overdrawn. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has a risk tier no lower than 29: then it is not garnished. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower has a debt ratio no higher than 75: then it is bankrupt. Policy IX. Suppose that borrower has a credit rating no higher than 51: then it is not bankrupt. Policy X. Suppose that borrower is amortized: then it is pensioned. Policy XI. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it is a depositor. Policy VIII is waived if that borrower is not audited. Policy X is waived if that borrower is not foreclosed. Policy VI is waived if that borrower is not foreclosed. Policy IV is waived if that borrower is amortized. Policy III is waived if that borrower is not prequalified. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy III. Question: Which choice is right for Folke?", "options": ["is a depositor", "is bankrupt", "is overdrawn", "is pensioned", "is garnished", "has an escrow account", "is a homeowner", "is solvent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bankrupt", "unit_id": "u004600", "pair_id": "u004600-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004600-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "85fbb067e9070572", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a6", "a11", "a5", "a9", "a15", "a17", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004600-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren has a guarantor. Folke has a debt ratio of 32. Hamid is prequalified. Folke is foreclosed. Folke has a risk tier of 90. Folke has no guarantor. Evren is not amortized. Folke has a credit rating of 67. Hamid is amortized. Ilse has a risk tier of 98. Hamid has a risk tier of 42. Folke is audited. Hamid has a credit rating of 16. Folke has a repayment grade of 86. Evren has a credit rating of 84.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has a debt ratio higher than 75: then it has an escrow account. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is not underwritten: then it has no mortgage. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is not foreclosed: then it is garnished. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a guarantor: then it is a homeowner. Policy V. Suppose that borrower has no collateral: then it is solvent. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower has a repayment grade smaller than 16: then it is overdrawn. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has a risk tier no lower than 29: then it is not garnished. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower has a debt ratio no higher than 75: then it is bankrupt. Policy IX. Suppose that borrower has a credit rating no higher than 51: then it is not bankrupt. Policy X. Suppose that borrower is amortized: then it is pensioned. Policy XI. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it is a depositor. Policy VIII is waived if that borrower is not audited. Policy X is waived if that borrower is not foreclosed. Policy VI is waived if that borrower is not foreclosed. Policy IV is waived if that borrower is amortized. Policy III is waived if that borrower is not prequalified. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy III. Question: Which choice is right for Folke?", "options": ["is a depositor", "is bankrupt", "is overdrawn", "is pensioned", "is garnished", "has an escrow account", "is a homeowner", "is solvent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bankrupt", "unit_id": "u004600", "pair_id": "u004600-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004600-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "60a6e106c04188a7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a6", "a11", "a5", "a9", "a15", "a17", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004603-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel has a pain level of 13. Zora has a chaperone. Wendel has a pacemaker. Wendel is not rescheduled. Zora is not ambulatory. Wendel is not triaged. Wendel has a fever reading of 81. Wendel is postoperative. Zora has a mobility rank of 93. Zora has a pain level of 94. Zora is triaged. Wendel is ambulatory. Wendel has a mobility rank of 15. Zora is not postoperative. Zora has a pacemaker.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here has a caregiver while is not rescheduled, thus it has an interpreter. Provision 2: when the patient here is not triaged, thus it is admitted. Provision 3: when the patient here has a caregiver while is rescheduled while has a pacemaker, thus it is diabetic. Provision 4: when the patient here has a caregiver while is not postoperative, thus it is allergic. Provision 5: when the patient here has a caregiver while has no chaperone, thus it is fasting. Provision 6: when the patient here has a caregiver while has a chaperone, thus it is asthmatic. Provision 7: when the patient here has a caregiver while is postoperative while is symptomatic, thus it is contagious. Provision 8: when the patient here has a fever reading beyond 41 while has a pain level at or below 22 while is ambulatory, thus it is discharged. Provision 9: when the patient here is discharged while has a mobility rank at or below 27, thus it has a caregiver. Question: Which one describes Wendel?", "options": ["is diabetic", "is allergic", "is asthmatic", "has an interpreter", "is contagious", "is fasting"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has an interpreter", "unit_id": "u004603", "pair_id": "u004603-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004603-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "7442b5becb7a2dc4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a13", "a7", "a14", "a1", "a8", "a10"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u004603-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel has a pain level of 13. Zora has a chaperone. Wendel has a pacemaker. Wendel is rescheduled. Zora is not ambulatory. Wendel is not triaged. Wendel has a fever reading of 81. Wendel is postoperative. Zora has a mobility rank of 93. Zora has a pain level of 94. Zora is triaged. Wendel is ambulatory. Wendel has a mobility rank of 15. Zora is not postoperative. Zora has a pacemaker.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here has a caregiver while is not rescheduled, thus it has an interpreter. Provision 2: when the patient here is not triaged, thus it is admitted. Provision 3: when the patient here has a caregiver while is rescheduled while has a pacemaker, thus it is diabetic. Provision 4: when the patient here has a caregiver while is not postoperative, thus it is allergic. Provision 5: when the patient here has a caregiver while has no chaperone, thus it is fasting. Provision 6: when the patient here has a caregiver while has a chaperone, thus it is asthmatic. Provision 7: when the patient here has a caregiver while is postoperative while is symptomatic, thus it is contagious. Provision 8: when the patient here has a fever reading beyond 41 while has a pain level at or below 22 while is ambulatory, thus it is discharged. Provision 9: when the patient here is discharged while has a mobility rank at or below 27, thus it has a caregiver. Question: Which one describes Wendel?", "options": ["is diabetic", "is allergic", "is asthmatic", "has an interpreter", "is contagious", "is fasting"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is diabetic", "unit_id": "u004603", "pair_id": "u004603-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004603-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "526e4927de93fb4d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a13", "a7", "a14", "a1", "a8", "a10"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u004651-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor has a seniority step of 77. Olek has a signing bonus. Noor has no signing bonus. Noor has an aptitude quotient of 39. Noor is not headhunted. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 34.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a seniority step that exceeds 77, so it is probationary. No. 2 While the given candidate has an aptitude quotient that falls below 69, so it is recommended. No. 3 While the given candidate has a signing bonus, so it is not onboarded. No. 4 While the given candidate has a background screening, so it is sponsored. No. 5 While the given candidate is onboarded, so it has a background screening. No. 6 While the given candidate has a seniority step not above 77, so it is onboarded. No. 7 While the given candidate is headhunted, so it is not freelance. No. 8 While the given candidate is recommended, so it has no background screening. No. 9 While the given candidate is probationary, so it is licensed. No. 10 While the given candidate is licensed, so it has a mentor. No. 6 wins over No. 3. No. 5 wins over No. 8. Question: Select what holds for Noor: which option?", "options": ["has a mentor", "is sponsored"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is sponsored", "unit_id": "u004651", "pair_id": "u004651-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004651-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8e39d50e49fe9a04", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004651-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor has a seniority step of 85. Olek has a signing bonus. Noor has no signing bonus. Noor has an aptitude quotient of 39. Noor is not headhunted. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 34.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a seniority step that exceeds 77, so it is probationary. No. 2 While the given candidate has an aptitude quotient that falls below 69, so it is recommended. No. 3 While the given candidate has a signing bonus, so it is not onboarded. No. 4 While the given candidate has a background screening, so it is sponsored. No. 5 While the given candidate is onboarded, so it has a background screening. No. 6 While the given candidate has a seniority step not above 77, so it is onboarded. No. 7 While the given candidate is headhunted, so it is not freelance. No. 8 While the given candidate is recommended, so it has no background screening. No. 9 While the given candidate is probationary, so it is licensed. No. 10 While the given candidate is licensed, so it has a mentor. No. 6 wins over No. 3. No. 5 wins over No. 8. Question: Select what holds for Noor: which option?", "options": ["has a mentor", "is sponsored"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a mentor", "unit_id": "u004651", "pair_id": "u004651-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004651-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "412b157048565269", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004663-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mica is minified. Pumice is merged. Mica is not fuzzed. Mica is not reproducible. Mica is not tested. Pumice has a security advisory. Pumice is reproducible. Mica has no security advisory.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is benchmarked, that build is obsolete. Item B. When the build is tagged, that build is backported. Item C. When the build is profiled, that build is linted. Item D. When the build is benchmarked, that build is experimental. Item E. When the build is reproducible, that build is signed. Item F. When the build has a migration script, that build is not obsolete. Item G. When the build is tested, that build is localized. Item H. When the build is tagged, that build has no changelog. Item I. When the build has a migration script, that build is profiled. Item J. When the build is minified, that build is reverted. Item K. When the build has a security advisory, that build has a changelog. Item L. When the build is tested, that build is not experimental. Item M. When the build is fuzzed, that build is documented. Item N. When the build is merged, that build is not signed. Item O. When the build is fuzzed, that build is not reverted. Item N outranks Item E. Item D outranks Item L. Item O outranks Item J. Item F outranks Item A. Item H outranks Item K. Question: What applies to Mica?", "options": ["is profiled", "is localized", "is backported", "is documented", "is reverted", "has a changelog", "is obsolete"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is reverted", "unit_id": "u004663", "pair_id": "u004663-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004663-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "48107e321bd105ba", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a5", "a18", "a10", "a12", "a6", "a11"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u004663-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mica is minified. Pumice is merged. Mica is fuzzed. Mica is not reproducible. Mica is not tested. Pumice has a security advisory. Pumice is reproducible. Mica has no security advisory.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is benchmarked, that build is obsolete. Item B. When the build is tagged, that build is backported. Item C. When the build is profiled, that build is linted. Item D. When the build is benchmarked, that build is experimental. Item E. When the build is reproducible, that build is signed. Item F. When the build has a migration script, that build is not obsolete. Item G. When the build is tested, that build is localized. Item H. When the build is tagged, that build has no changelog. Item I. When the build has a migration script, that build is profiled. Item J. When the build is minified, that build is reverted. Item K. When the build has a security advisory, that build has a changelog. Item L. When the build is tested, that build is not experimental. Item M. When the build is fuzzed, that build is documented. Item N. When the build is merged, that build is not signed. Item O. When the build is fuzzed, that build is not reverted. Item N outranks Item E. Item D outranks Item L. Item O outranks Item J. Item F outranks Item A. Item H outranks Item K. Question: What applies to Mica?", "options": ["is profiled", "is localized", "is backported", "is documented", "is reverted", "has a changelog", "is obsolete"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is documented", "unit_id": "u004663", "pair_id": "u004663-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004663-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "700170cf1a54914c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a5", "a18", "a10", "a12", "a6", "a11"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u004712-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is not cached. Quasar is not throttled. Nimbus has a latency budget of 76. Nimbus is not cached. Tundra is virtualized. Tundra is not cached. Tundra is throttled.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is containerized, it then is sharded. #2 Each time a workload is not cached, it then is monitored. #3 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is not mirrored. #4 Each time a workload is not mirrored, it then is not sharded. #5 Each time a workload is not deprecated, it then is containerized. #6 Each time a workload has a latency budget of 40 or above, it then has a GPU. Question: Do the terms above show that Tundra is sharded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004712", "pair_id": "u004712-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004712-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "3727366781d54a14", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004712-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is not cached. Quasar is not throttled. Nimbus has a latency budget of 76. Nimbus is not cached. Tundra is virtualized. Tundra is not cached. Tundra is throttled.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is containerized, it then is sharded. #2 Each time a workload is not cached, it then is monitored. #3 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is not mirrored. #4 Each time a workload is not mirrored, it then is not sharded. #5 Each time a workload is not deprecated, it then is containerized. #6 Each time a workload is throttled, it then is not deprecated. #7 Each time a workload has a latency budget of 40 or above, it then has a GPU. Question: Do the terms above show that Tundra is sharded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004712", "pair_id": "u004712-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004712-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "81c46ed6c8a72cce", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004733-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is anemic. Benedek has no chaperone. Benedek is not sedated. Dorian is pregnant. Dorian has a pacemaker. Dorian is not discharged. Wendel is hypertensive. Gunnar has a pacemaker. Dorian is not anemic. Gunnar is hypertensive. Gunnar is not allergic. Dorian is allergic. Dorian is symptomatic. Benedek is not discharged. Wendel is not anemic.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is discharged while has a chaperone, thus it is diabetic. Provision 2: when the patient here is waitlisted while has a pacemaker while is allergic, thus it has a caregiver. Provision 3: when the patient here is symptomatic while is pregnant, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 4: when the patient here is hypertensive, thus it is not diabetic. Provision 5: when the patient here is anemic while is sedated, thus it is not waitlisted. Provision 6: when the patient here is waitlisted while is symptomatic, thus it has no caregiver. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Would it be right to say that Dorian has a caregiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004733", "pair_id": "u004733-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004733-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a48e6021aa7d3855", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004733-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is anemic. Benedek has no chaperone. Benedek is not sedated. Dorian is pregnant. Dorian has a pacemaker. Dorian is not discharged. Wendel is hypertensive. Dorian is hypertensive. Gunnar has a pacemaker. Dorian is not anemic. Gunnar is hypertensive. Gunnar is not allergic. Dorian is allergic. Dorian is symptomatic. Benedek is not discharged. Wendel is not anemic.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is discharged while has a chaperone, thus it is diabetic. Provision 2: when the patient here is waitlisted while has a pacemaker while is allergic, thus it has a caregiver. Provision 3: when the patient here is symptomatic while is pregnant, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 4: when the patient here is hypertensive, thus it is not diabetic. Provision 5: when the patient here is anemic while is sedated, thus it is not waitlisted. Provision 6: when the patient here is waitlisted while is symptomatic, thus it has no caregiver. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Would it be right to say that Dorian has a caregiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004733", "pair_id": "u004733-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004733-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "792cef2ad979d0f8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004733-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is anemic. Benedek has no chaperone. Benedek is not sedated. Dorian is pregnant. Dorian has a pacemaker. Dorian is not discharged. Wendel is hypertensive. Gunnar has a pacemaker. Dorian is not anemic. Gunnar is hypertensive. Gunnar is not allergic. Dorian is allergic. Dorian is symptomatic. Benedek is not discharged. Wendel is not anemic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is discharged and further has a chaperone, it thereby is diabetic. Point B. If said patient is waitlisted and further has a pacemaker and further is allergic, it thereby has a caregiver. Point C. If said patient is symptomatic and further is pregnant, it thereby is waitlisted. Point D. If said patient is hypertensive, it thereby is not diabetic. Point E. If said patient is anemic and further is sedated, it thereby is not waitlisted. Point F. If said patient is waitlisted and further is symptomatic, it thereby has no caregiver. Point A supersedes Point D. Point C supersedes Point E. Point B supersedes Point F. Question: Statement: Dorian has a caregiver. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004733", "pair_id": "u004733-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004733-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a48e6021aa7d3855", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004733-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is anemic. Benedek has no chaperone. Benedek is not sedated. Dorian is pregnant. Dorian has a pacemaker. Dorian is not discharged. Wendel is hypertensive. Dorian is hypertensive. Gunnar has a pacemaker. Dorian is not anemic. Gunnar is hypertensive. Gunnar is not allergic. Dorian is allergic. Dorian is symptomatic. Benedek is not discharged. Wendel is not anemic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is discharged and further has a chaperone, it thereby is diabetic. Point B. If said patient is waitlisted and further has a pacemaker and further is allergic, it thereby has a caregiver. Point C. If said patient is symptomatic and further is pregnant, it thereby is waitlisted. Point D. If said patient is hypertensive, it thereby is not diabetic. Point E. If said patient is anemic and further is sedated, it thereby is not waitlisted. Point F. If said patient is waitlisted and further is symptomatic, it thereby has no caregiver. Point A supersedes Point D. Point C supersedes Point E. Point B supersedes Point F. Question: Statement: Dorian has a caregiver. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004733", "pair_id": "u004733-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004733-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "792cef2ad979d0f8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004734-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Teodor is recommended. Teodor is interviewed. Teodor has a mentor. Jasna is a graduate. Jasna has no mentor. Mads has a portfolio. Teodor is not a graduate. Teodor has no portfolio. Mads is a graduate.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has no portfolio, so it has a background screening. No. 2 While the given candidate has a background screening and likewise is recommended, so it is headhunted. No. 3 While the given candidate has a background screening and likewise is interviewed and likewise is a graduate, so it is not headhunted. No. 4 While the given candidate has a mentor, so it is licensed. Question: Is the claim \"Teodor is not headhunted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004734", "pair_id": "u004734-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004734-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "4206fc807e9982bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u004734-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Teodor is recommended. Teodor is interviewed. Teodor has a mentor. Jasna is a graduate. Jasna has no mentor. Mads has a portfolio. Teodor is not a graduate. Teodor has no portfolio. Mads is a graduate.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a portfolio, so it has a background screening. No. 2 While the given candidate has a background screening and likewise is recommended, so it is headhunted. No. 3 While the given candidate has a background screening and likewise is interviewed and likewise is a graduate, so it is not headhunted. No. 4 While the given candidate has a mentor, so it is licensed. Question: Is the claim \"Teodor is not headhunted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004734", "pair_id": "u004734-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004734-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "3890020286fee689", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u004745-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is multicenter. Electra has no ethics clearance. Electra is not translational. Deneb has no patent filing. Fomalhaut is shortlisted. Nashira has no patent filing. Fomalhaut has a steering committee. Fomalhaut has no ethics clearance. Fomalhaut is collaborative. Electra has no patent filing. Fomalhaut has a patent filing. Electra is multicenter. Electra has a steering committee.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has a postdoc provided that it is collaborative as well as has a patent filing. Section 2: a proposal is not embargoed provided that it has no steering committee. Section 3: a proposal is embargoed provided that it is translational as well as is collaborative as well as has a patent filing. Section 4: a proposal is not preregistered provided that it is multicenter as well as is shortlisted. Section 5: a proposal is theoretical provided that it has a postdoc as well as has a steering committee. Section 6: a proposal is not theoretical provided that it has a postdoc as well as has a steering committee as well as has ethics clearance. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Fomalhaut is theoretical. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004745", "pair_id": "u004745-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004745-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2b7d42071d892e7e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004745-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is multicenter. Electra has no ethics clearance. Electra is not translational. Deneb has no patent filing. Fomalhaut is shortlisted. Nashira has no patent filing. Fomalhaut has a steering committee. Fomalhaut has no ethics clearance. Fomalhaut is collaborative. Electra has no patent filing. Fomalhaut has a patent filing. Electra is multicenter. Electra has a steering committee.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has a postdoc provided that it is collaborative as well as has a patent filing. Section 2: a proposal is not embargoed provided that it has a steering committee. Section 3: a proposal is embargoed provided that it is translational as well as is collaborative as well as has a patent filing. Section 4: a proposal is not preregistered provided that it is multicenter as well as is shortlisted. Section 5: a proposal is theoretical provided that it has a postdoc as well as has a steering committee. Section 6: a proposal is not theoretical provided that it has a postdoc as well as has a steering committee as well as has ethics clearance. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Fomalhaut is theoretical. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004745", "pair_id": "u004745-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004745-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ed00078b1075f455", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004745-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is multicenter. Electra has no ethics clearance. Electra is not translational. Deneb has no patent filing. Fomalhaut is shortlisted. Nashira has no patent filing. Fomalhaut has a steering committee. Fomalhaut has no ethics clearance. Fomalhaut is collaborative. Electra has no patent filing. Fomalhaut has a patent filing. Electra is multicenter. Electra has a steering committee.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is collaborative and additionally has a patent filing, it then has a postdoc. #2 Each time a proposal has no steering committee, it then is not embargoed. #3 Each time a proposal is translational and additionally is collaborative and additionally has a patent filing, it then is embargoed. #4 Each time a proposal is multicenter and additionally is shortlisted, it then is not preregistered. #5 Each time a proposal has a postdoc and additionally has a steering committee, it then is theoretical. #6 Each time a proposal has a postdoc and additionally has a steering committee and additionally has ethics clearance, it then is not theoretical. #5 yields to #6. #3 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Fomalhaut is theoretical?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004745", "pair_id": "u004745-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004745-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2b7d42071d892e7e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004745-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is multicenter. Electra has no ethics clearance. Electra is not translational. Deneb has no patent filing. Fomalhaut is shortlisted. Nashira has no patent filing. Fomalhaut has a steering committee. Fomalhaut has no ethics clearance. Fomalhaut is collaborative. Electra has no patent filing. Fomalhaut has a patent filing. Electra is multicenter. Electra has a steering committee.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is collaborative and additionally has a patent filing, it then has a postdoc. #2 Each time a proposal has a steering committee, it then is not embargoed. #3 Each time a proposal is translational and additionally is collaborative and additionally has a patent filing, it then is embargoed. #4 Each time a proposal is multicenter and additionally is shortlisted, it then is not preregistered. #5 Each time a proposal has a postdoc and additionally has a steering committee, it then is theoretical. #6 Each time a proposal has a postdoc and additionally has a steering committee and additionally has ethics clearance, it then is not theoretical. #5 yields to #6. #3 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Fomalhaut is theoretical?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004745", "pair_id": "u004745-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004745-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ed00078b1075f455", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004755-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not palletized. Saskia is not labeled. Saskia is registered. Saskia is not rerouted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is not labeled while is registered, thus it is oversized. Provision 2: when the parcel here is not rerouted, thus it has a barcode. Provision 3: when the parcel here has a barcode while is labeled while is palletized, thus it is not scanned. Provision 4: when the parcel here has a barcode while is not labeled while is palletized, thus it is scanned. Provision 5: when the parcel here is registered while is not palletized, thus it is tracked. Question: Would it be right to say that Saskia is scanned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004755", "pair_id": "u004755-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004755-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "cb461129e6f720a4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004755-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is palletized. Saskia is not labeled. Saskia is registered. Saskia is not rerouted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is not labeled while is registered, thus it is oversized. Provision 2: when the parcel here is not rerouted, thus it has a barcode. Provision 3: when the parcel here has a barcode while is labeled while is palletized, thus it is not scanned. Provision 4: when the parcel here has a barcode while is not labeled while is palletized, thus it is scanned. Provision 5: when the parcel here is registered while is not palletized, thus it is tracked. Question: Would it be right to say that Saskia is scanned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004755", "pair_id": "u004755-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004755-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "06db9e6b5197a9e1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004755-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not palletized. Saskia is not labeled. Saskia is registered. Saskia is not rerouted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is not labeled and likewise is registered, so it is oversized. No. 2 While the given parcel is not rerouted, so it has a barcode. No. 3 While the given parcel has a barcode and likewise is labeled and likewise is palletized, so it is not scanned. No. 4 While the given parcel has a barcode and likewise is not labeled and likewise is palletized, so it is scanned. No. 5 While the given parcel is registered and likewise is not palletized, so it is tracked. Question: Is the claim \"Saskia is scanned\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004755", "pair_id": "u004755-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004755-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "cb461129e6f720a4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004755-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is palletized. Saskia is not labeled. Saskia is registered. Saskia is not rerouted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is not labeled and likewise is registered, so it is oversized. No. 2 While the given parcel is not rerouted, so it has a barcode. No. 3 While the given parcel has a barcode and likewise is labeled and likewise is palletized, so it is not scanned. No. 4 While the given parcel has a barcode and likewise is not labeled and likewise is palletized, so it is scanned. No. 5 While the given parcel is registered and likewise is not palletized, so it is tracked. Question: Is the claim \"Saskia is scanned\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004755", "pair_id": "u004755-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004755-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "06db9e6b5197a9e1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u004771-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is hazardous. Nandor has a parcel volume of 97. Priya is damaged. Odile is hazardous.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is not damaged, then it is not tracked. (2) If a parcel has a parcel volume of at least 85, then it is fragile. (3) If a parcel is not hazardous, then it has a waybill. (4) If a parcel is not hazardous, then it has no waybill. (4) is void if the parcel has a parcel volume below 78. (3) is void if the parcel has a parcel volume of at least 78. (3) is void if the parcel is hazardous. When (4) and (3) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Nandor has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004771", "pair_id": "u004771-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004771-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9656c7d78f3344bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004771-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is hazardous. Nandor has a parcel volume of 97. Priya is damaged. Odile is hazardous.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is not damaged, then it is not tracked. (2) If a parcel has a parcel volume below 85, then it is fragile. (3) If a parcel is not hazardous, then it has a waybill. (4) If a parcel is not hazardous, then it has no waybill. (4) is void if the parcel has a parcel volume below 78. (3) is void if the parcel has a parcel volume of at least 78. (3) is void if the parcel is hazardous. When (4) and (3) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Nandor has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004771", "pair_id": "u004771-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004771-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5a650cac457ec501", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004771-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is hazardous. Nandor has a parcel volume of 97. Priya is damaged. Odile is hazardous.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is not damaged, that parcel is not tracked. Item B. When the parcel has a parcel volume of no less than 85, that parcel is fragile. Item C. When the parcel is not hazardous, that parcel has a waybill. Item D. When the parcel is not hazardous, that parcel has no waybill. Item D is suspended when the parcel has a parcel volume of less than 78. Item C is suspended when the parcel has a parcel volume of no less than 78. Item C is suspended when the parcel is hazardous. Item D outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Nandor has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004771", "pair_id": "u004771-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004771-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9656c7d78f3344bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004771-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is hazardous. Nandor has a parcel volume of 97. Priya is damaged. Odile is hazardous.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is not damaged, that parcel is not tracked. Item B. When the parcel has a parcel volume of less than 85, that parcel is fragile. Item C. When the parcel is not hazardous, that parcel has a waybill. Item D. When the parcel is not hazardous, that parcel has no waybill. Item D is suspended when the parcel has a parcel volume of less than 78. Item C is suspended when the parcel has a parcel volume of no less than 78. Item C is suspended when the parcel is hazardous. Item D outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Nandor has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004771", "pair_id": "u004771-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004771-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5a650cac457ec501", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004853-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not employed. Bastien has a cosigner. Bastien has a guarantor. Bastien is not vetted. Bastien is not a homeowner. Bastien is not amortized. Bastien has collateral.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is underwritten provided that it is delinquent. Section 2: a borrower is a depositor provided that it is prequalified as well as has a guarantor. Section 3: a borrower has a lien provided that it has a mortgage as well as is amortized as well as is a homeowner. Section 4: a borrower is not creditworthy provided that it is prequalified as well as has a guarantor as well as is underwritten. Section 5: a borrower is solvent provided that it is pensioned as well as is employed. Section 6: a borrower is creditworthy provided that it is prequalified as well as has collateral. Section 7: a borrower is not prequalified provided that it is foreclosed. Section 8: a borrower is prequalified provided that it has a mortgage as well as has collateral. Section 7 lapses for a borrower if it is vetted. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 8. Question: Bastien is creditworthy. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004853", "pair_id": "u004853-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004853-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4d901cd151d7fd6d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a15", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004853-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not employed. Bastien has a cosigner. Bastien has a guarantor. Bastien is not vetted. Bastien is not a homeowner. Bastien is not amortized. Bastien has collateral.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is underwritten provided that it is delinquent. Section 2: a borrower is a depositor provided that it is prequalified as well as has a guarantor. Section 3: a borrower has a lien provided that it has a mortgage as well as is amortized as well as is a homeowner. Section 4: a borrower is not creditworthy provided that it is prequalified as well as has a guarantor as well as is underwritten. Section 5: a borrower is solvent provided that it is pensioned as well as is employed. Section 6: a borrower has a mortgage provided that it has a cosigner as well as has collateral. Section 7: a borrower is creditworthy provided that it is prequalified as well as has collateral. Section 8: a borrower is not prequalified provided that it is foreclosed. Section 9: a borrower is prequalified provided that it has a mortgage as well as has collateral. Section 8 lapses for a borrower if it is vetted. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 7. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 9. Question: Bastien is creditworthy. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004853", "pair_id": "u004853-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004853-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "60c12945e6387939", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a15", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004853-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not employed. Bastien has a cosigner. Bastien has a guarantor. Bastien is not vetted. Bastien is not a homeowner. Bastien is not amortized. Bastien has collateral.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is delinquent, it then is underwritten. #2 Each time a borrower is prequalified and additionally has a guarantor, it then is a depositor. #3 Each time a borrower has a mortgage and additionally is amortized and additionally is a homeowner, it then has a lien. #4 Each time a borrower is prequalified and additionally has a guarantor and additionally is underwritten, it then is not creditworthy. #5 Each time a borrower is pensioned and additionally is employed, it then is solvent. #6 Each time a borrower is prequalified and additionally has collateral, it then is creditworthy. #7 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then is not prequalified. #8 Each time a borrower has a mortgage and additionally has collateral, it then is prequalified. #7 is set aside if a borrower is vetted. #6 yields to #4. #8 yields to #7. Question: Do the terms above show that Bastien is creditworthy?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004853", "pair_id": "u004853-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004853-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4d901cd151d7fd6d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a15", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004853-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not employed. Bastien has a cosigner. Bastien has a guarantor. Bastien is not vetted. Bastien is not a homeowner. Bastien is not amortized. Bastien has collateral.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is delinquent, it then is underwritten. #2 Each time a borrower is prequalified and additionally has a guarantor, it then is a depositor. #3 Each time a borrower has a mortgage and additionally is amortized and additionally is a homeowner, it then has a lien. #4 Each time a borrower is prequalified and additionally has a guarantor and additionally is underwritten, it then is not creditworthy. #5 Each time a borrower is pensioned and additionally is employed, it then is solvent. #6 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally has collateral, it then has a mortgage. #7 Each time a borrower is prequalified and additionally has collateral, it then is creditworthy. #8 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then is not prequalified. #9 Each time a borrower has a mortgage and additionally has collateral, it then is prequalified. #8 is set aside if a borrower is vetted. #7 yields to #4. #9 yields to #8. Question: Do the terms above show that Bastien is creditworthy?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004853", "pair_id": "u004853-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004853-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "60c12945e6387939", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a15", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004890-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not undeliverable. Saskia is not weighed. Saskia is not stamped. Saskia is delayed. Saskia is rerouted. Saskia is labeled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is rerouted plus is labeled: then it is hazardous. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is weighed: then it is prepaid. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is undeliverable: then it is not prepaid. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is rerouted plus is not delayed: then it is not hazardous. Policy IV is waived if that parcel is stamped. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Saskia is hazardous?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004890", "pair_id": "u004890-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004890-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "19d822088d6d7bce", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004890-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not undeliverable. Saskia is not weighed. Saskia is not stamped. Saskia is delayed. Saskia is rerouted. Saskia is labeled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is rerouted plus is labeled: then it is hazardous. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is weighed: then it is prepaid. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is undeliverable: then it is not prepaid. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is rerouted plus is delayed: then it is not hazardous. Policy IV is waived if that parcel is stamped. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Saskia is hazardous?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004890", "pair_id": "u004890-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004890-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "99b96aedfa13d2f4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004945-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif is waitlisted. Elif has a chaperone. Dorian is not referred. Xenia is not waitlisted. Dorian has a chaperone. Dorian is waitlisted. Dorian is not anemic. Dorian has no pacemaker. Elif has a pacemaker. Elif is not anemic.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has no chaperone: then it is not allergic. Policy II. Suppose that patient is anemic: then it is pregnant. Policy III. Suppose that patient has a caregiver: then it is fasting. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is referred: then it is allergic. Policy V. Suppose that patient is waitlisted: then it is not pregnant. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is not waitlisted: then it has no caregiver. Policy VII. Suppose that patient is waitlisted: then it has a caregiver. Policy VI is waived if that patient has a pacemaker. Policy VI is waived if that patient is referred. Policy VII is waived if that patient is not referred. Policy IV is waived if that patient is not waitlisted. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy VII. Question: Is it so that Dorian has a caregiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u004945", "pair_id": "u004945-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004945-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7002e0fa452b8e20", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004945-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif is waitlisted. Elif has a chaperone. Dorian is not referred. Xenia is not waitlisted. Dorian has a chaperone. Dorian is waitlisted. Dorian is not anemic. Dorian has no pacemaker. Elif has a pacemaker. Elif is not anemic.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has no chaperone: then it is not allergic. Policy II. Suppose that patient is anemic: then it is pregnant. Policy III. Suppose that patient has a caregiver: then it is fasting. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is referred: then it is allergic. Policy V. Suppose that patient is waitlisted: then it is not pregnant. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is waitlisted: then it has no caregiver. Policy VII. Suppose that patient is waitlisted: then it has a caregiver. Policy VI is waived if that patient has a pacemaker. Policy VI is waived if that patient is referred. Policy VII is waived if that patient is not referred. Policy IV is waived if that patient is not waitlisted. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy VII. Question: Is it so that Dorian has a caregiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004945", "pair_id": "u004945-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004945-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4cf7ace88dfd0b52", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u004962-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is indemnified. Bruno has a deductible waiver. Bruno is a smoker. Fabian is a smoker. Bruno is disputed. Agata is not uninsurable. Fabian has no roadside assistance. Bruno has roadside assistance. Fabian is not reinstated. Bruno is not uninsurable. Bruno is indemnified. Agata is not a smoker. Bruno is reinstated. Agata has no roadside assistance.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has roadside assistance plus has a deductible waiver: then it is grandfathered. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is grandfathered plus is disputed plus is uninsurable: then it has no dashcam. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified plus is not uninsurable plus is a smoker: then it has a premium discount. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is grandfathered plus is reinstated: then it has a dashcam. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. Question: Is it so that Bruno has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004962", "pair_id": "u004962-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004962-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "79615f72929a4a2c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u004962-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is indemnified. Bruno has a deductible waiver. Bruno is a smoker. Fabian is a smoker. Bruno is disputed. Agata is not uninsurable. Fabian has no roadside assistance. Bruno has roadside assistance. Fabian is not reinstated. Bruno is not uninsurable. Bruno is indemnified. Agata is not a smoker. Bruno is reinstated. Agata has no roadside assistance.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has roadside assistance plus has a deductible waiver: then it is grandfathered. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is grandfathered plus is disputed plus is uninsurable: then it has no dashcam. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified plus is uninsurable plus is a smoker: then it has a premium discount. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is grandfathered plus is reinstated: then it has a dashcam. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. Question: Is it so that Bruno has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004962", "pair_id": "u004962-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u004962-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e604a5318676ef9c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u004968-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar has a review mark of 40. Hadar is not endorsed. Kochab has a review mark of 85. Hadar has a citation index of 26.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a citation index above 40, then it is embargoed. (2) If a proposal has a citation index of at most 83, then it is not peer reviewed. (3) If a proposal is endorsed, then it is interdisciplinary. (4) If a proposal has a review mark of at most 40, then it is peer reviewed. (5) If a proposal is not endorsed, then it is not interdisciplinary. When (2) and (4) clash, (2) prevails. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Hadar is peer reviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u004968", "pair_id": "u004968-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004968-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9e03d2130a9708fe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u004968-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar has a review mark of 40. Hadar is not endorsed. Kochab has a review mark of 85. Hadar has a citation index of 26.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a citation index above 40, then it is embargoed. (2) If a proposal has a citation index of at most 83, then it is not peer reviewed. (3) If a proposal is endorsed, then it is interdisciplinary. (4) If a proposal has a review mark of at most 40, then it is peer reviewed. (5) If a proposal is not endorsed, then it is not interdisciplinary. When (4) and (2) clash, (4) prevails. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Hadar is peer reviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u004968", "pair_id": "u004968-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u004968-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "76a62f54d8201e6b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005004-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery is backed up. Orrery is not throttled. Nimbus has a firewall. Nimbus is not throttled. Orrery has a firewall. Orrery is not isolated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload has no GPU provided that it is not isolated. Section 2: a workload has a public endpoint provided that it is sharded. Section 3: a workload is provisioned provided that it is backed up. Section 4: a workload is sharded provided that it is not backed up. Section 5: a workload is idle provided that it has no failover node. Section 6: a workload has a dedicated host provided that it has no GPU. Section 7: a workload has no failover node provided that it has a firewall. Section 8: a workload is virtualized provided that it is not throttled. Section 3 lapses for a workload if it is throttled. Section 5 lapses for a workload if it is not isolated. Question: Which statement fits Orrery?", "options": ["has a dedicated host", "has a public endpoint", "is idle"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a dedicated host", "unit_id": "u005004", "pair_id": "u005004-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005004-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "900848fc32626a16", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a7", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005004-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery is backed up. Orrery is not throttled. Nimbus has a firewall. Nimbus is not throttled. Orrery has a firewall. Orrery is isolated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload has no GPU provided that it is not isolated. Section 2: a workload has a public endpoint provided that it is sharded. Section 3: a workload is provisioned provided that it is backed up. Section 4: a workload is sharded provided that it is not backed up. Section 5: a workload is idle provided that it has no failover node. Section 6: a workload has a dedicated host provided that it has no GPU. Section 7: a workload has no failover node provided that it has a firewall. Section 8: a workload is virtualized provided that it is not throttled. Section 3 lapses for a workload if it is throttled. Section 5 lapses for a workload if it is not isolated. Question: Which statement fits Orrery?", "options": ["has a dedicated host", "has a public endpoint", "is idle"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is idle", "unit_id": "u005004", "pair_id": "u005004-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005004-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8fb9d17f86eaa841", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a7", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005004-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery is backed up. Orrery is not throttled. Nimbus has a firewall. Nimbus is not throttled. Orrery has a firewall. Orrery is not isolated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is not isolated: then it has no GPU. Policy II. Suppose that workload is sharded: then it has a public endpoint. Policy III. Suppose that workload is backed up: then it is provisioned. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is not backed up: then it is sharded. Policy V. Suppose that workload has no failover node: then it is idle. Policy VI. Suppose that workload has no GPU: then it has a dedicated host. Policy VII. Suppose that workload has a firewall: then it has no failover node. Policy VIII. Suppose that workload is not throttled: then it is virtualized. Policy III is waived if that workload is throttled. Policy V is waived if that workload is not isolated. Question: Which choice is right for Orrery?", "options": ["has a dedicated host", "has a public endpoint", "is idle"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a dedicated host", "unit_id": "u005004", "pair_id": "u005004-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005004-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "900848fc32626a16", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a7", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005004-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery is backed up. Orrery is not throttled. Nimbus has a firewall. Nimbus is not throttled. Orrery has a firewall. Orrery is isolated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is not isolated: then it has no GPU. Policy II. Suppose that workload is sharded: then it has a public endpoint. Policy III. Suppose that workload is backed up: then it is provisioned. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is not backed up: then it is sharded. Policy V. Suppose that workload has no failover node: then it is idle. Policy VI. Suppose that workload has no GPU: then it has a dedicated host. Policy VII. Suppose that workload has a firewall: then it has no failover node. Policy VIII. Suppose that workload is not throttled: then it is virtualized. Policy III is waived if that workload is throttled. Policy V is waived if that workload is not isolated. Question: Which choice is right for Orrery?", "options": ["has a dedicated host", "has a public endpoint", "is idle"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is idle", "unit_id": "u005004", "pair_id": "u005004-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005004-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8fb9d17f86eaa841", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a7", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005011-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Borealis is idle. Juno is not idle. Kestrel is isolated. Juno is not mirrored. Kestrel is not autoscaled. Juno is not autoscaled. Halcyon is not mirrored. Borealis is isolated. Juno has a CPU quota of 0. Borealis has a CPU quota of 40. Halcyon is not backed up. Kestrel is not backed up. Juno is isolated. Borealis is not autoscaled.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is deprecated, it thereby is not sandboxed. Point B. If said workload is deprecated, it thereby is not monitored. Point C. If said workload is isolated, it thereby has no dedicated host. Point D. If said workload is replicated, it thereby is cached. Point E. If said workload is encrypted, it thereby is virtualized. Point F. If said workload is not sandboxed, it thereby is containerized. Point G. If said workload is mirrored, it thereby is patched. Point H. If said workload is patched, it thereby is encrypted. Point I. If said workload is not idle, it thereby is not cached. Point J. If said workload has a CPU quota in excess of 42, it thereby has a dedicated host. Point K. If said workload has a CPU quota short of 34, it thereby is deprecated. Point L. If said workload is backed up, it thereby is sandboxed. Point M. If said workload is not backed up, it thereby is not patched. Point N. If said workload is cached, it thereby is monitored. Point O. If said workload is not autoscaled, it thereby is replicated. Point N is cancelled if said workload has a CPU quota of minimum 10. Point C is cancelled if said workload is autoscaled. Point M supersedes Point G. Point B supersedes Point N. Point A supersedes Point L. Point D supersedes Point I. Point J supersedes Point C. Question: Which choice is true for Juno?", "options": ["is virtualized", "is containerized", "is monitored"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is containerized", "unit_id": "u005011", "pair_id": "u005011-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/10/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005011-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bb5a3b11227448de", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a11", "a2", "a14"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005011-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Borealis is idle. Juno is not idle. Kestrel is isolated. Juno is not mirrored. Kestrel is not autoscaled. Juno is not autoscaled. Halcyon is not mirrored. Borealis is isolated. Juno has a CPU quota of 0. Borealis has a CPU quota of 40. Halcyon is not backed up. Kestrel is not backed up. Juno is isolated. Borealis is not autoscaled.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is deprecated, it thereby is not sandboxed. Point B. If said workload is deprecated, it thereby is not monitored. Point C. If said workload is isolated, it thereby has no dedicated host. Point D. If said workload is replicated, it thereby is cached. Point E. If said workload is encrypted, it thereby is virtualized. Point F. If said workload is not sandboxed, it thereby is containerized. Point G. If said workload is mirrored, it thereby is patched. Point H. If said workload is patched, it thereby is encrypted. Point I. If said workload is not idle, it thereby is not cached. Point J. If said workload has a CPU quota in excess of 42, it thereby has a dedicated host. Point K. If said workload has a CPU quota of minimum 34, it thereby is deprecated. Point L. If said workload is backed up, it thereby is sandboxed. Point M. If said workload is not backed up, it thereby is not patched. Point N. If said workload is cached, it thereby is monitored. Point O. If said workload is not autoscaled, it thereby is replicated. Point N is cancelled if said workload has a CPU quota of minimum 10. Point C is cancelled if said workload is autoscaled. Point M supersedes Point G. Point B supersedes Point N. Point A supersedes Point L. Point D supersedes Point I. Point J supersedes Point C. Question: Which choice is true for Juno?", "options": ["is virtualized", "is containerized", "is monitored"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is monitored", "unit_id": "u005011", "pair_id": "u005011-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/10/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005011-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "724c9cef3d2e0cdb", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a11", "a2", "a14"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005013-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not eligible. Petra has a notice period of 56. Lotte is not probationary.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is not eligible: then it is recommended. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is not probationary: then it has a background screening. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a notice period higher than 27: then it is not recommended. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has a notice period higher than 11: then it has no background screening. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. Question: Is it so that Lotte is recommended?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005013", "pair_id": "u005013-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005013-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0bfcc99cff6c8af6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005013-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not eligible. Petra has a notice period of 56. Lotte is not probationary.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is eligible: then it is recommended. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is not probationary: then it has a background screening. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a notice period higher than 27: then it is not recommended. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has a notice period higher than 11: then it has no background screening. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. Question: Is it so that Lotte is recommended?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005013", "pair_id": "u005013-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005013-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9868fcfe707015d0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005013-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not eligible. Petra has a notice period of 56. Lotte is not probationary.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is not eligible, it then is recommended. #2 Each time a candidate is not probationary, it then has a background screening. #3 Each time a candidate has a notice period greater than 27, it then is not recommended. #4 Each time a candidate has a notice period greater than 11, it then has no background screening. #3 yields to #1. #4 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Lotte is recommended?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005013", "pair_id": "u005013-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005013-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0bfcc99cff6c8af6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005013-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not eligible. Petra has a notice period of 56. Lotte is not probationary.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is eligible, it then is recommended. #2 Each time a candidate is not probationary, it then has a background screening. #3 Each time a candidate has a notice period greater than 27, it then is not recommended. #4 Each time a candidate has a notice period greater than 11, it then has no background screening. #3 yields to #1. #4 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Lotte is recommended?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005013", "pair_id": "u005013-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005013-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9868fcfe707015d0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005037-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is diabetic. Xenia is ambulatory.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is diabetic, thus it is postoperative. Provision 2: when the patient here is asthmatic, thus it is pregnant. Provision 3: when the patient here is not asthmatic, thus it is rescheduled. Provision 4: when the patient here is rescheduled, thus it has an interpreter. Provision 5: when the patient here is not ambulatory, thus it is not referred. Provision 6: when the patient here has no interpreter, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 7: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it has no interpreter. Question: Would it be right to say that Xenia has an interpreter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005037", "pair_id": "u005037-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005037-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "c9514e48adadd3a9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005037-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is asthmatic. Xenia is diabetic. Xenia is ambulatory.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is diabetic, thus it is postoperative. Provision 2: when the patient here is asthmatic, thus it is pregnant. Provision 3: when the patient here is not asthmatic, thus it is rescheduled. Provision 4: when the patient here is rescheduled, thus it has an interpreter. Provision 5: when the patient here is not ambulatory, thus it is not referred. Provision 6: when the patient here has no interpreter, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 7: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it has no interpreter. Question: Would it be right to say that Xenia has an interpreter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005037", "pair_id": "u005037-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005037-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "2bea9130c4286d31", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005039-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is vaccinated. Zora is vaccinated. Yusuf is not asthmatic. Zora is allergic. Gunnar is not allergic. Yusuf is allergic. Yusuf is vaccinated. Vilja is not allergic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is vaccinated, it thereby is fasting. Point B. If said patient is allergic, it thereby is hypertensive. Point C. If said patient is not vaccinated, it thereby is not contagious. Point C is cancelled if said patient is not allergic. Question: Statement: Vilja is not asthmatic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005039", "pair_id": "u005039-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005039-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "81437fc00d052c62", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005039-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is asthmatic. Vilja is vaccinated. Zora is vaccinated. Yusuf is not asthmatic. Zora is allergic. Gunnar is not allergic. Yusuf is allergic. Yusuf is vaccinated. Vilja is not allergic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is vaccinated, it thereby is fasting. Point B. If said patient is allergic, it thereby is hypertensive. Point C. If said patient is not vaccinated, it thereby is not contagious. Point C is cancelled if said patient is not allergic. Question: Statement: Vilja is not asthmatic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005039", "pair_id": "u005039-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005039-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a60bed6a233fbf86", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005061-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not tested. Obsidian is not obsolete. Mica has a defect tally of 69. Galena is not reproducible. Mica is not reproducible.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a defect tally short of 59, it thereby has no changelog. Point B. If said build is tested and further is obsolete, it thereby has a changelog. Point B is cancelled if said build is reproducible. Point B supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Mica is obsolete. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005061", "pair_id": "u005061-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005061-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9f48c948f62bfa5c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005061-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not tested. Mica is obsolete. Obsidian is not obsolete. Mica has a defect tally of 69. Galena is not reproducible. Mica is not reproducible.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a defect tally short of 59, it thereby has no changelog. Point B. If said build is tested and further is obsolete, it thereby has a changelog. Point B is cancelled if said build is reproducible. Point B supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Mica is obsolete. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005061", "pair_id": "u005061-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005061-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "178d6761e1e1a1d6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005061-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not tested. Obsidian is not obsolete. Mica has a defect tally of 69. Galena is not reproducible. Mica is not reproducible.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a defect tally that falls below 59, so it has no changelog. No. 2 While the given build is tested and likewise is obsolete, so it has a changelog. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build is reproducible. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Mica is obsolete\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005061", "pair_id": "u005061-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005061-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9f48c948f62bfa5c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005061-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not tested. Mica is obsolete. Obsidian is not obsolete. Mica has a defect tally of 69. Galena is not reproducible. Mica is not reproducible.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a defect tally that falls below 59, so it has no changelog. No. 2 While the given build is tested and likewise is obsolete, so it has a changelog. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build is reproducible. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Mica is obsolete\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005061", "pair_id": "u005061-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005061-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "178d6761e1e1a1d6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005078-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has a latency budget of 72. Zephyr is virtualized. Zephyr has a latency budget of 24. Orrery is not virtualized. Cobalt has a latency budget of 38. Cobalt is not virtualized.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is monitored, so it has a failover node. No. 2 While the given workload is virtualized, so it is not isolated. No. 3 While the given workload is backed up, so it is sharded. No. 4 While the given workload has a latency budget not above 17, so it is backed up. No. 5 While the given workload is patched, so it is idle. No. 6 While the given workload is backed up, so it is monitored. No. 7 While the given workload is idle, so it has a firewall. No. 8 While the given workload has a latency budget that exceeds 14, so it is autoscaled. No. 9 While the given workload has a latency budget that exceeds 17, so it is patched. Question: Select what holds for Zephyr: which option?", "options": ["has a failover node", "has a firewall"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a firewall", "unit_id": "u005078", "pair_id": "u005078-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005078-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "dedf36d0f25de2f2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005078-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has a latency budget of 72. Zephyr is virtualized. Zephyr has a latency budget of 7. Orrery is not virtualized. Cobalt has a latency budget of 38. Cobalt is not virtualized.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is monitored, so it has a failover node. No. 2 While the given workload is virtualized, so it is not isolated. No. 3 While the given workload is backed up, so it is sharded. No. 4 While the given workload has a latency budget not above 17, so it is backed up. No. 5 While the given workload is patched, so it is idle. No. 6 While the given workload is backed up, so it is monitored. No. 7 While the given workload is idle, so it has a firewall. No. 8 While the given workload has a latency budget that exceeds 14, so it is autoscaled. No. 9 While the given workload has a latency budget that exceeds 17, so it is patched. Question: Select what holds for Zephyr: which option?", "options": ["has a failover node", "has a firewall"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a failover node", "unit_id": "u005078", "pair_id": "u005078-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005078-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "587ec42ba39e5e4f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005115-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is sharded. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Vesper is encrypted. Halcyon is sharded. Halcyon is isolated. Halcyon has a public endpoint. Quasar is sharded. Vesper is deprecated. Halcyon is encrypted. Quasar is not deprecated. Quasar is stateless. Halcyon is not stateless. Quasar is not sandboxed.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is not sandboxed and is not sharded, then it is patched. (2) If a workload is not sharded and is not encrypted, then it is cached. (3) If a workload has a failover node and is isolated, then it has a snapshot. (4) If a workload is not stateless and has a public endpoint, then it is throttled. (5) If a workload is not sandboxed and is sharded and is not deprecated, then it is not patched. Question: Is it true that Halcyon is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005115", "pair_id": "u005115-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005115-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "d7b2106be6908971", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u005115-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is sharded. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Vesper is encrypted. Halcyon is sharded. Halcyon is isolated. Halcyon has no public endpoint. Quasar is sharded. Vesper is deprecated. Halcyon is encrypted. Quasar is not deprecated. Quasar is stateless. Halcyon is not stateless. Quasar is not sandboxed.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is not sandboxed and is not sharded, then it is patched. (2) If a workload is not sharded and is not encrypted, then it is cached. (3) If a workload has a failover node and is isolated, then it has a snapshot. (4) If a workload is not stateless and has a public endpoint, then it is throttled. (5) If a workload is not sandboxed and is sharded and is not deprecated, then it is not patched. Question: Is it true that Halcyon is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005115", "pair_id": "u005115-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005115-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "43b086cbcb1b97e5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u005115-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is sharded. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Vesper is encrypted. Halcyon is sharded. Halcyon is isolated. Halcyon has a public endpoint. Quasar is sharded. Vesper is deprecated. Halcyon is encrypted. Quasar is not deprecated. Quasar is stateless. Halcyon is not stateless. Quasar is not sandboxed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is not sandboxed and also is not sharded, it also is patched. Clause 2: once any workload is not sharded and also is not encrypted, it also is cached. Clause 3: once any workload has a failover node and also is isolated, it also has a snapshot. Clause 4: once any workload is not stateless and also has a public endpoint, it also is throttled. Clause 5: once any workload is not sandboxed and also is sharded and also is not deprecated, it also is not patched. Question: Does it follow that Halcyon is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005115", "pair_id": "u005115-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005115-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "d7b2106be6908971", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u005115-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is sharded. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Vesper is encrypted. Halcyon is sharded. Halcyon is isolated. Halcyon has no public endpoint. Quasar is sharded. Vesper is deprecated. Halcyon is encrypted. Quasar is not deprecated. Quasar is stateless. Halcyon is not stateless. Quasar is not sandboxed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is not sandboxed and also is not sharded, it also is patched. Clause 2: once any workload is not sharded and also is not encrypted, it also is cached. Clause 3: once any workload has a failover node and also is isolated, it also has a snapshot. Clause 4: once any workload is not stateless and also has a public endpoint, it also is throttled. Clause 5: once any workload is not sandboxed and also is sharded and also is not deprecated, it also is not patched. Question: Does it follow that Halcyon is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005115", "pair_id": "u005115-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005115-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "43b086cbcb1b97e5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u005157-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wiebke is not prequalified. Hamid is prequalified. Hamid is amortized. Wiebke is creditworthy. Wiebke has a credit rating of 5. Wiebke has no escrow account. Greta has an escrow account. Hamid is pensioned. Bastien has a credit rating of 39. Wiebke is not amortized. Greta is not amortized.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has collateral provided that it has a lien. Section 2: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it is garnished. Section 3: a borrower is not audited provided that it is pensioned. Section 4: a borrower has no lien provided that it has an escrow account. Section 5: a borrower has no collateral provided that it is garnished. Section 6: a borrower is audited provided that it is prequalified. Section 7: a borrower is garnished provided that it is not amortized. Section 8: a borrower has a lien provided that it has a credit rating lower than 78. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Which statement fits Wiebke?", "options": ["has a cosigner", "has collateral"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a cosigner", "unit_id": "u005157", "pair_id": "u005157-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005157-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2729256edeb0123d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a10"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005157-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wiebke is not prequalified. Hamid is prequalified. Hamid is amortized. Wiebke is creditworthy. Wiebke has a credit rating of 5. Wiebke has no escrow account. Greta has an escrow account. Hamid is pensioned. Bastien has a credit rating of 39. Wiebke is not amortized. Greta is not amortized.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has collateral provided that it has a lien. Section 2: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it is garnished. Section 3: a borrower is not audited provided that it is pensioned. Section 4: a borrower has no lien provided that it has an escrow account. Section 5: a borrower has no collateral provided that it is garnished. Section 6: a borrower is audited provided that it is prequalified. Section 7: a borrower is garnished provided that it is amortized. Section 8: a borrower has a lien provided that it has a credit rating lower than 78. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Which statement fits Wiebke?", "options": ["has a cosigner", "has collateral"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u005157", "pair_id": "u005157-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005157-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "76b47e88eda00c91", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a10"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005157-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wiebke is not prequalified. Hamid is prequalified. Hamid is amortized. Wiebke is creditworthy. Wiebke has a credit rating of 5. Wiebke has no escrow account. Greta has an escrow account. Hamid is pensioned. Bastien has a credit rating of 39. Wiebke is not amortized. Greta is not amortized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has a lien, it then has collateral. #2 Each time a borrower is garnished, it then has a cosigner. #3 Each time a borrower is pensioned, it then is not audited. #4 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then has no lien. #5 Each time a borrower is garnished, it then has no collateral. #6 Each time a borrower is prequalified, it then is audited. #7 Each time a borrower is not amortized, it then is garnished. #8 Each time a borrower has a credit rating less than 78, it then has a lien. #6 yields to #3. #1 yields to #5. #4 yields to #8. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Wiebke?", "options": ["has a cosigner", "has collateral"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a cosigner", "unit_id": "u005157", "pair_id": "u005157-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005157-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2729256edeb0123d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a10"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005157-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wiebke is not prequalified. Hamid is prequalified. Hamid is amortized. Wiebke is creditworthy. Wiebke has a credit rating of 5. Wiebke has no escrow account. Greta has an escrow account. Hamid is pensioned. Bastien has a credit rating of 39. Wiebke is not amortized. Greta is not amortized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has a lien, it then has collateral. #2 Each time a borrower is garnished, it then has a cosigner. #3 Each time a borrower is pensioned, it then is not audited. #4 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then has no lien. #5 Each time a borrower is garnished, it then has no collateral. #6 Each time a borrower is prequalified, it then is audited. #7 Each time a borrower is amortized, it then is garnished. #8 Each time a borrower has a credit rating less than 78, it then has a lien. #6 yields to #3. #1 yields to #5. #4 yields to #8. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Wiebke?", "options": ["has a cosigner", "has collateral"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u005157", "pair_id": "u005157-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005157-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "76b47e88eda00c91", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a10"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005197-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus is not registered. Rasmus has a delivery window of 37. Rasmus is oversized. Rasmus is undeliverable. Rasmus is misrouted. Rasmus is delayed. Rasmus has a postal zone of 10. Rasmus is not hazardous.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a parcel volume below 35, then it is labeled. (2) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a postal zone of at most 11, then it is weighed. (3) If a parcel is undeliverable, then it has a courier. (4) If a parcel is refrigerated and is misrouted and is stamped, then it is tracked. (5) If a parcel is stamped and is hazardous, then it has a locker slot. (6) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a delivery window below 20 and has a locker slot, then it is consolidated. (7) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a delivery window of at least 20 and is delayed, then it is damaged. (8) If a parcel is oversized, then it is refrigerated. (9) If a parcel is refrigerated and is delayed and is stamped, then it has a barcode. (7) is void if the parcel is registered. (1) is void if the parcel is misrouted. (2) is void if the parcel is delayed. Question: Which option holds for Rasmus?", "options": ["is damaged", "has a barcode", "is tracked", "is consolidated", "is labeled", "is weighed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is damaged", "unit_id": "u005197", "pair_id": "u005197-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005197-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "99494c119b66c553", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a7", "a12", "a6", "a13", "a17"]}, "attempt": 48}}
{"id": "syn-u005197-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus is not registered. Rasmus has a delivery window of 37. Rasmus is oversized. Rasmus is undeliverable. Rasmus is misrouted. Rasmus is not delayed. Rasmus has a postal zone of 10. Rasmus is not hazardous.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a parcel volume below 35, then it is labeled. (2) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a postal zone of at most 11, then it is weighed. (3) If a parcel is undeliverable, then it has a courier. (4) If a parcel is refrigerated and is misrouted and is stamped, then it is tracked. (5) If a parcel is stamped and is hazardous, then it has a locker slot. (6) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a delivery window below 20 and has a locker slot, then it is consolidated. (7) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a delivery window of at least 20 and is delayed, then it is damaged. (8) If a parcel is oversized, then it is refrigerated. (9) If a parcel is refrigerated and is delayed and is stamped, then it has a barcode. (7) is void if the parcel is registered. (1) is void if the parcel is misrouted. (2) is void if the parcel is delayed. Question: Which option holds for Rasmus?", "options": ["is damaged", "has a barcode", "is tracked", "is consolidated", "is labeled", "is weighed"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is weighed", "unit_id": "u005197", "pair_id": "u005197-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005197-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6c0d3717d23077ec", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a7", "a12", "a6", "a13", "a17"]}, "attempt": 48}}
{"id": "syn-u005197-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus is not registered. Rasmus has a delivery window of 37. Rasmus is oversized. Rasmus is undeliverable. Rasmus is misrouted. Rasmus is delayed. Rasmus has a postal zone of 10. Rasmus is not hazardous.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is refrigerated and also has a parcel volume under 35, it also is labeled. Clause 2: once any parcel is refrigerated and also has a postal zone of 11 or less, it also is weighed. Clause 3: once any parcel is undeliverable, it also has a courier. Clause 4: once any parcel is refrigerated and also is misrouted and also is stamped, it also is tracked. Clause 5: once any parcel is stamped and also is hazardous, it also has a locker slot. Clause 6: once any parcel is refrigerated and also has a delivery window under 20 and also has a locker slot, it also is consolidated. Clause 7: once any parcel is refrigerated and also has a delivery window of 20 or more and also is delayed, it also is damaged. Clause 8: once any parcel is oversized, it also is refrigerated. Clause 9: once any parcel is refrigerated and also is delayed and also is stamped, it also has a barcode. Clause 7 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is registered. Clause 1 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is misrouted. Clause 2 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is delayed. Question: Which of these is true of Rasmus?", "options": ["is damaged", "has a barcode", "is tracked", "is consolidated", "is labeled", "is weighed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is damaged", "unit_id": "u005197", "pair_id": "u005197-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005197-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "99494c119b66c553", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a7", "a12", "a6", "a13", "a17"]}, "attempt": 48}}
{"id": "syn-u005197-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus is not registered. Rasmus has a delivery window of 37. Rasmus is oversized. Rasmus is undeliverable. Rasmus is misrouted. Rasmus is not delayed. Rasmus has a postal zone of 10. Rasmus is not hazardous.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is refrigerated and also has a parcel volume under 35, it also is labeled. Clause 2: once any parcel is refrigerated and also has a postal zone of 11 or less, it also is weighed. Clause 3: once any parcel is undeliverable, it also has a courier. Clause 4: once any parcel is refrigerated and also is misrouted and also is stamped, it also is tracked. Clause 5: once any parcel is stamped and also is hazardous, it also has a locker slot. Clause 6: once any parcel is refrigerated and also has a delivery window under 20 and also has a locker slot, it also is consolidated. Clause 7: once any parcel is refrigerated and also has a delivery window of 20 or more and also is delayed, it also is damaged. Clause 8: once any parcel is oversized, it also is refrigerated. Clause 9: once any parcel is refrigerated and also is delayed and also is stamped, it also has a barcode. Clause 7 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is registered. Clause 1 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is misrouted. Clause 2 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is delayed. Question: Which of these is true of Rasmus?", "options": ["is damaged", "has a barcode", "is tracked", "is consolidated", "is labeled", "is weighed"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is weighed", "unit_id": "u005197", "pair_id": "u005197-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005197-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6c0d3717d23077ec", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a7", "a12", "a6", "a13", "a17"]}, "attempt": 48}}
{"id": "syn-u005197-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus is not registered. Rasmus has a delivery window of 37. Rasmus is oversized. Rasmus is undeliverable. Rasmus is misrouted. Rasmus is delayed. Rasmus has a postal zone of 10. Rasmus is not hazardous.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is refrigerated, and has a parcel volume of less than 35, that parcel is labeled. Item B. When the parcel is refrigerated, and has a postal zone of no more than 11, that parcel is weighed. Item C. When the parcel is undeliverable, that parcel has a courier. Item D. When the parcel is refrigerated, and is misrouted, and is stamped, that parcel is tracked. Item E. When the parcel is stamped, and is hazardous, that parcel has a locker slot. Item F. When the parcel is refrigerated, and has a delivery window of less than 20, and has a locker slot, that parcel is consolidated. Item G. When the parcel is refrigerated, and has a delivery window of no less than 20, and is delayed, that parcel is damaged. Item H. When the parcel is oversized, that parcel is refrigerated. Item I. When the parcel is refrigerated, and is delayed, and is stamped, that parcel has a barcode. Item G is suspended when the parcel is registered. Item A is suspended when the parcel is misrouted. Item B is suspended when the parcel is delayed. Question: What applies to Rasmus?", "options": ["is damaged", "has a barcode", "is tracked", "is consolidated", "is labeled", "is weighed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is damaged", "unit_id": "u005197", "pair_id": "u005197-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005197-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "99494c119b66c553", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a7", "a12", "a6", "a13", "a17"]}, "attempt": 48}}
{"id": "syn-u005197-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus is not registered. Rasmus has a delivery window of 37. Rasmus is oversized. Rasmus is undeliverable. Rasmus is misrouted. Rasmus is not delayed. Rasmus has a postal zone of 10. Rasmus is not hazardous.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is refrigerated, and has a parcel volume of less than 35, that parcel is labeled. Item B. When the parcel is refrigerated, and has a postal zone of no more than 11, that parcel is weighed. Item C. When the parcel is undeliverable, that parcel has a courier. Item D. When the parcel is refrigerated, and is misrouted, and is stamped, that parcel is tracked. Item E. When the parcel is stamped, and is hazardous, that parcel has a locker slot. Item F. When the parcel is refrigerated, and has a delivery window of less than 20, and has a locker slot, that parcel is consolidated. Item G. When the parcel is refrigerated, and has a delivery window of no less than 20, and is delayed, that parcel is damaged. Item H. When the parcel is oversized, that parcel is refrigerated. Item I. When the parcel is refrigerated, and is delayed, and is stamped, that parcel has a barcode. Item G is suspended when the parcel is registered. Item A is suspended when the parcel is misrouted. Item B is suspended when the parcel is delayed. Question: What applies to Rasmus?", "options": ["is damaged", "has a barcode", "is tracked", "is consolidated", "is labeled", "is weighed"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is weighed", "unit_id": "u005197", "pair_id": "u005197-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005197-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6c0d3717d23077ec", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a7", "a12", "a6", "a13", "a17"]}, "attempt": 48}}
{"id": "syn-u005204-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is flaky. Obsidian has a migration script. Gneiss is compiled. Gneiss has no migration script. Gneiss is not flaky. Obsidian is not flaky. Galena is not compiled. Galena has no migration script.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is not compiled, it thereby is versioned. Point A is cancelled if said build is flaky. Question: Statement: Gneiss has a migration script. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005204", "pair_id": "u005204-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005204-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "36d5018fe8c8f9bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005204-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is flaky. Obsidian has a migration script. Gneiss is compiled. Gneiss has a migration script. Gneiss is not flaky. Obsidian is not flaky. Galena is not compiled. Galena has no migration script.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is not compiled, it thereby is versioned. Point A is cancelled if said build is flaky. Question: Statement: Gneiss has a migration script. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005204", "pair_id": "u005204-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005204-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2a25485af3080332", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005233-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is foreclosed. Ilse has no escrow account. Wiebke is audited. Ilse has a credit rating of 2. Evren is not underwritten. Wiebke is not foreclosed. Evren has an escrow account. Ilse is audited. Wiebke has a credit rating of 43. Evren has a credit rating of 61. Ilse is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is garnished, it also is solvent. Clause 2: once any borrower is a homeowner, it also is not solvent. Clause 3: once any borrower is vetted, it also is a homeowner. Clause 4: once any borrower is not audited, it also is amortized. Clause 5: once any borrower is amortized, it also is garnished. Clause 6: once any borrower has no escrow account, it also is not amortized. Clause 7: once any borrower is foreclosed, it also is vetted. Clause 8: once any borrower is underwritten, it also has a lien. Clause 9: once any borrower has a credit rating of 14 or more, it also is not vetted. Clause 4 overrides Clause 6. Clause 2 overrides Clause 1. Clause 7 overrides Clause 9. Question: Does it follow that Ilse is solvent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005233", "pair_id": "u005233-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005233-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c184a70981ffdddb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005233-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is foreclosed. Ilse has no escrow account. Wiebke is audited. Ilse has a credit rating of 2. Evren is not underwritten. Wiebke is not foreclosed. Evren has an escrow account. Ilse is audited. Wiebke has a credit rating of 43. Evren has a credit rating of 61. Ilse is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is garnished, it also is solvent. Clause 2: once any borrower is a homeowner, it also is not solvent. Clause 3: once any borrower is not vetted, it also is a homeowner. Clause 4: once any borrower is not audited, it also is amortized. Clause 5: once any borrower is amortized, it also is garnished. Clause 6: once any borrower has no escrow account, it also is not amortized. Clause 7: once any borrower is foreclosed, it also is vetted. Clause 8: once any borrower is underwritten, it also has a lien. Clause 9: once any borrower has a credit rating of 14 or more, it also is not vetted. Clause 4 overrides Clause 6. Clause 2 overrides Clause 1. Clause 7 overrides Clause 9. Question: Does it follow that Ilse is solvent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005233", "pair_id": "u005233-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005233-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cbc4d8858bb1489c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005300-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse is audited. Ilse is foreclosed. Wiebke is not audited. Anouk is audited. Bastien is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is creditworthy and also is foreclosed, it also is vetted. Question: Does it follow that Wiebke is not audited?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005300", "pair_id": "u005300-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005300-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "0ad85afeccb70468", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005300-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse is audited. Wiebke is not creditworthy. Ilse is foreclosed. Wiebke is not audited. Anouk is audited. Bastien is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is creditworthy and also is foreclosed, it also is vetted. Question: Does it follow that Wiebke is not audited?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005300", "pair_id": "u005300-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005300-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "8e23e9844a7df69c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005304-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is not reimbursed. Xaver is not a smoker. Zdenek is not lapsed. Bruno is covered. Celeste is not covered. Celeste is not disputed. Xaver is reimbursed. Zdenek is covered. Xaver is not covered. Celeste is not inspected. Celeste is lapsed. Zdenek is a smoker. Zdenek is inspected. Xaver is disputed. Zdenek is not disputed. Xaver is not lapsed. Xaver is inspected.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is bundled and is not covered and is inspected, then it is not a claimant. (2) If a policyholder is bundled and is inspected and is a smoker, then it is a claimant. (3) If a policyholder is disputed and is lapsed, then it has no dashcam. (4) If a policyholder is inspected, then it is bundled. (2) is void if the policyholder is reimbursed. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Xaver is a claimant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005304", "pair_id": "u005304-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005304-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9e0c4ae13bb6c725", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u005304-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is not reimbursed. Xaver is not a smoker. Zdenek is not lapsed. Bruno is covered. Celeste is not covered. Celeste is not disputed. Xaver is reimbursed. Zdenek is covered. Xaver is not covered. Celeste is not inspected. Celeste is lapsed. Zdenek is a smoker. Zdenek is inspected. Xaver is disputed. Zdenek is not disputed. Xaver is not lapsed. Xaver is inspected.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is bundled and is covered and is inspected, then it is not a claimant. (2) If a policyholder is bundled and is inspected and is a smoker, then it is a claimant. (3) If a policyholder is disputed and is lapsed, then it has no dashcam. (4) If a policyholder is inspected, then it is bundled. (2) is void if the policyholder is reimbursed. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Xaver is a claimant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005304", "pair_id": "u005304-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005304-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cf7f755341ae2294", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u005328-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel is symptomatic. Xenia is rescheduled. Wendel is admitted. Xenia is not allergic. Benedek is admitted. Wendel is not allergic. Wendel is anemic. Wendel is rescheduled. Dorian is not referred. Dorian is anemic. Wendel is not referred. Dorian is not rescheduled. Xenia is not referred. Benedek is allergic. Dorian is ambulatory. Xenia is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is asthmatic, and is symptomatic, and is referred, that patient is hypertensive. Item B. When the patient is not pregnant, and is anemic, that patient is triaged. Item C. When the patient is admitted, and is not allergic, that patient has an interpreter. Item D. When the patient is asthmatic, and is not symptomatic, that patient is discharged. Item E. When the patient is anemic, and is rescheduled, that patient is asthmatic. Item F. When the patient is hypertensive, and is admitted, that patient has a caregiver. Item G. When the patient is asthmatic, and is referred, and is not ambulatory, that patient has a pacemaker. Item H. When the patient is asthmatic, and is not referred, and is symptomatic, that patient is pregnant. Question: What applies to Wendel?", "options": ["is hypertensive", "has a pacemaker", "is pregnant", "is discharged"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is pregnant", "unit_id": "u005328", "pair_id": "u005328-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005328-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "3fc06ad3186ec19d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a5", "a8", "a3"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u005328-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel is symptomatic. Xenia is rescheduled. Wendel is admitted. Xenia is not allergic. Benedek is admitted. Wendel is not allergic. Wendel is anemic. Wendel is rescheduled. Dorian is not referred. Dorian is anemic. Wendel is referred. Dorian is not rescheduled. Xenia is not referred. Benedek is allergic. Dorian is ambulatory. Xenia is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is asthmatic, and is symptomatic, and is referred, that patient is hypertensive. Item B. When the patient is not pregnant, and is anemic, that patient is triaged. Item C. When the patient is admitted, and is not allergic, that patient has an interpreter. Item D. When the patient is asthmatic, and is not symptomatic, that patient is discharged. Item E. When the patient is anemic, and is rescheduled, that patient is asthmatic. Item F. When the patient is hypertensive, and is admitted, that patient has a caregiver. Item G. When the patient is asthmatic, and is referred, and is not ambulatory, that patient has a pacemaker. Item H. When the patient is asthmatic, and is not referred, and is symptomatic, that patient is pregnant. Question: What applies to Wendel?", "options": ["is hypertensive", "has a pacemaker", "is pregnant", "is discharged"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is hypertensive", "unit_id": "u005328", "pair_id": "u005328-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005328-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "fd785eb4414f84d8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a5", "a8", "a3"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u005332-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has no snapshot. Nimbus is patched. Nimbus is not mirrored. Nimbus is not virtualized. Nimbus has no firewall. Nimbus is replicated. Nimbus is not cached.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is provisioned provided that it is replicated as well as is monitored. Section 2: a workload is autoscaled provided that it is patched. Section 3: a workload is sandboxed provided that it has a snapshot. Section 4: a workload has a GPU provided that it is autoscaled as well as has a firewall as well as is virtualized. Section 5: a workload has no GPU provided that it is autoscaled as well as has no firewall as well as is not cached. Section 6: a workload is backed up provided that it is cached as well as is not monitored as well as is mirrored. Question: Nimbus has a GPU. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005332", "pair_id": "u005332-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005332-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "4207c8bf1ff488b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 43}}
{"id": "syn-u005332-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has no snapshot. Nimbus is patched. Nimbus is not mirrored. Nimbus is not virtualized. Nimbus has no firewall. Nimbus is replicated. Nimbus is not cached.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is provisioned provided that it is replicated as well as is monitored. Section 2: a workload is autoscaled provided that it is not patched. Section 3: a workload is sandboxed provided that it has a snapshot. Section 4: a workload has a GPU provided that it is autoscaled as well as has a firewall as well as is virtualized. Section 5: a workload has no GPU provided that it is autoscaled as well as has no firewall as well as is not cached. Section 6: a workload is backed up provided that it is cached as well as is not monitored as well as is mirrored. Question: Nimbus has a GPU. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005332", "pair_id": "u005332-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005332-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "3639210f2df24a42", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 43}}
{"id": "syn-u005379-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is reimbursed. Dmitri is not uninsurable. Dmitri has a peril factor of 0. Dmitri has a premium band of 3. Dmitri has flood coverage. Agata is indemnified. Viggo is not reimbursed. Dmitri is not indemnified. Agata has a payout ceiling of 74. Zdenek has flood coverage. Dmitri has a payout ceiling of 30. Viggo has no flood coverage. Agata is uninsurable. Agata is reimbursed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is uninsurable, it also has no adjuster. Clause 2: once any policyholder is uninsurable and also has a peril factor over 44 and also has flood coverage, it also is bundled. Clause 3: once any policyholder is uninsurable and also has a peril factor of 44 or less and also has a payout ceiling of 42 or less, it also is not bundled. Clause 4: once any policyholder is indemnified and also is uninsurable, it also has an adjuster. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a peril factor of 42 or less and also is reimbursed, it also has roadside assistance. Clause 6: once any policyholder has a premium band under 26, it also is lapsed. Clause 7: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also is not lapsed. Clause 2 overrides Clause 3. Clause 7 overrides Clause 6. Clause 4 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Dmitri is not bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005379", "pair_id": "u005379-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005379-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "85b085ac76feb2d5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005379-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is reimbursed. Dmitri is uninsurable. Dmitri has a peril factor of 0. Dmitri has a premium band of 3. Dmitri has flood coverage. Agata is indemnified. Viggo is not reimbursed. Dmitri is not indemnified. Agata has a payout ceiling of 74. Zdenek has flood coverage. Dmitri has a payout ceiling of 30. Viggo has no flood coverage. Agata is uninsurable. Agata is reimbursed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is uninsurable, it also has no adjuster. Clause 2: once any policyholder is uninsurable and also has a peril factor over 44 and also has flood coverage, it also is bundled. Clause 3: once any policyholder is uninsurable and also has a peril factor of 44 or less and also has a payout ceiling of 42 or less, it also is not bundled. Clause 4: once any policyholder is indemnified and also is uninsurable, it also has an adjuster. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a peril factor of 42 or less and also is reimbursed, it also has roadside assistance. Clause 6: once any policyholder has a premium band under 26, it also is lapsed. Clause 7: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also is not lapsed. Clause 2 overrides Clause 3. Clause 7 overrides Clause 6. Clause 4 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Dmitri is not bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005379", "pair_id": "u005379-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005379-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2037e108de99339b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005379-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is reimbursed. Dmitri is not uninsurable. Dmitri has a peril factor of 0. Dmitri has a premium band of 3. Dmitri has flood coverage. Agata is indemnified. Viggo is not reimbursed. Dmitri is not indemnified. Agata has a payout ceiling of 74. Zdenek has flood coverage. Dmitri has a payout ceiling of 30. Viggo has no flood coverage. Agata is uninsurable. Agata is reimbursed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is uninsurable, that policyholder has no adjuster. Item B. When the policyholder is uninsurable, and has a peril factor of more than 44, and has flood coverage, that policyholder is bundled. Item C. When the policyholder is uninsurable, and has a peril factor of no more than 44, and has a payout ceiling of no more than 42, that policyholder is not bundled. Item D. When the policyholder is indemnified, and is uninsurable, that policyholder has an adjuster. Item E. When the policyholder has a peril factor of no more than 42, and is reimbursed, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item F. When the policyholder has a premium band of less than 26, that policyholder is lapsed. Item G. When the policyholder has flood coverage, that policyholder is not lapsed. Item B outranks Item C. Item G outranks Item F. Item D outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Dmitri is not bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005379", "pair_id": "u005379-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005379-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "85b085ac76feb2d5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005379-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is reimbursed. Dmitri is uninsurable. Dmitri has a peril factor of 0. Dmitri has a premium band of 3. Dmitri has flood coverage. Agata is indemnified. Viggo is not reimbursed. Dmitri is not indemnified. Agata has a payout ceiling of 74. Zdenek has flood coverage. Dmitri has a payout ceiling of 30. Viggo has no flood coverage. Agata is uninsurable. Agata is reimbursed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is uninsurable, that policyholder has no adjuster. Item B. When the policyholder is uninsurable, and has a peril factor of more than 44, and has flood coverage, that policyholder is bundled. Item C. When the policyholder is uninsurable, and has a peril factor of no more than 44, and has a payout ceiling of no more than 42, that policyholder is not bundled. Item D. When the policyholder is indemnified, and is uninsurable, that policyholder has an adjuster. Item E. When the policyholder has a peril factor of no more than 42, and is reimbursed, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item F. When the policyholder has a premium band of less than 26, that policyholder is lapsed. Item G. When the policyholder has flood coverage, that policyholder is not lapsed. Item B outranks Item C. Item G outranks Item F. Item D outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Dmitri is not bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005379", "pair_id": "u005379-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005379-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2037e108de99339b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005400-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc has a test yield of 91. Talc is not reverted. Talc is not experimental. Obsidian is not reverted. Talc has a defect tally of 25. Obsidian has a defect tally of 77. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is signed, thus it is not notarized. Provision 2: when the build here is not experimental, thus it is localized. Provision 3: when the build here is signed, thus it is notarized. Provision 4: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it is signed. Provision 5: when the build here is reverted, thus it has a feature toggle. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here has a test yield at or above 53. Provision 5 has no effect when the build here has a defect tally at or above 32. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here has a test yield beneath 53. Question: Would it be right to say that Talc is notarized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005400", "pair_id": "u005400-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005400-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "67d38a8660719c42", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u005400-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc has a test yield of 91. Talc is not reverted. Talc is not experimental. Obsidian is not reverted. Talc has a defect tally of 25. Obsidian has a defect tally of 77. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is signed, thus it is not notarized. Provision 2: when the build here is experimental, thus it is localized. Provision 3: when the build here is signed, thus it is notarized. Provision 4: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it is signed. Provision 5: when the build here is reverted, thus it has a feature toggle. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here has a test yield at or above 53. Provision 5 has no effect when the build here has a defect tally at or above 32. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here has a test yield beneath 53. Question: Would it be right to say that Talc is notarized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005400", "pair_id": "u005400-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005400-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "718666dd786783ff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u005405-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach is not a pilot study. Deneb has no patent filing. Mirach is translational. Deneb has a team size of 8. Mirach has no patent filing. Mirach has a team size of 95. Aldebaran is theoretical. Aldebaran is not translational. Hadar is not translational. Aldebaran is not a pilot study. Deneb is translational. Deneb is a pilot study. Hadar is a pilot study. Hadar is not theoretical. Mirach is theoretical. Deneb has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is renewed and further has a patent filing and further is not theoretical, it thereby has seed funding. Point B. If said proposal is translational and further is a pilot study, it thereby is cofunded. Point C. If said proposal is renewed and further has no patent filing and further has ethics clearance, it thereby has no seed funding. Point C is cancelled if said proposal has a patent filing and further has a team size short of 86. Question: Statement: Deneb has seed funding. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005405", "pair_id": "u005405-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005405-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7ca447fd1a1ccb2d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005405-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach is not a pilot study. Deneb has no patent filing. Mirach is translational. Deneb has a team size of 8. Mirach has no patent filing. Mirach has a team size of 95. Aldebaran is theoretical. Aldebaran is not translational. Hadar is not translational. Aldebaran is not a pilot study. Deneb is translational. Deneb is a pilot study. Hadar is a pilot study. Hadar is not theoretical. Mirach is theoretical. Deneb has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is renewed and further has a patent filing and further is not theoretical, it thereby has seed funding. Point B. If said proposal has a team size of maximum 24, it thereby is renewed. Point C. If said proposal is translational and further is a pilot study, it thereby is cofunded. Point D. If said proposal is renewed and further has no patent filing and further has ethics clearance, it thereby has no seed funding. Point D is cancelled if said proposal has a patent filing and further has a team size short of 86. Question: Statement: Deneb has seed funding. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005405", "pair_id": "u005405-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005405-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "10b026b91e6c7f1e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005407-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar is not tagged. Feldspar has a changelog. Feldspar is not reproducible. Feldspar is minified.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is minified: then it is not compiled. Policy II. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it is not notarized. Policy III. Suppose that build is experimental: then it has a migration script. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is not reverted. Policy V. Suppose that build is notarized: then it is profiled. Policy VI. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is merged. Policy VII. Suppose that build is not tagged: then it is not merged. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is tagged: then it is notarized. Policy IX. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is not profiled. Policy X. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it is reverted. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy X. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VI. Question: Is it so that Feldspar is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005407", "pair_id": "u005407-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005407-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "459bac7cfcb381b1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005407-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar is not tagged. Feldspar has a changelog. Feldspar is not reproducible. Feldspar is minified.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is minified: then it is not compiled. Policy II. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it is not notarized. Policy III. Suppose that build is experimental: then it has a migration script. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is not reverted. Policy V. Suppose that build is notarized: then it is profiled. Policy VI. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is merged. Policy VII. Suppose that build is tagged: then it is not merged. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is tagged: then it is notarized. Policy IX. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is not profiled. Policy X. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it is reverted. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy X. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VI. Question: Is it so that Feldspar is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005407", "pair_id": "u005407-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005407-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "43af9a2c60480f8f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005413-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda is sponsored. Hedda has a diploma. Hedda is relocating. Hedda is headhunted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is certified provided that it is sponsored as well as has a diploma. Section 2: a candidate has a portfolio provided that it is fingerprinted. Section 3: a candidate is seasoned provided that it is headhunted as well as is relocating as well as is sponsored. Section 4: a candidate is freelance provided that it is sponsored as well as is probationary as well as has a diploma. Section 1 lapses for a candidate if it is probationary. Question: Which statement fits Hedda?", "options": ["is freelance", "is certified"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is certified", "unit_id": "u005413", "pair_id": "u005413-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005413-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fcd856c8a1cadffc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005413-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda is sponsored. Hedda has a diploma. Hedda is relocating. Hedda is headhunted. Hedda is probationary.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is certified provided that it is sponsored as well as has a diploma. Section 2: a candidate has a portfolio provided that it is fingerprinted. Section 3: a candidate is seasoned provided that it is headhunted as well as is relocating as well as is sponsored. Section 4: a candidate is freelance provided that it is sponsored as well as is probationary as well as has a diploma. Section 1 lapses for a candidate if it is probationary. Question: Which statement fits Hedda?", "options": ["is freelance", "is certified"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is freelance", "unit_id": "u005413", "pair_id": "u005413-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005413-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "78444af625fe804a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005413-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda is sponsored. Hedda has a diploma. Hedda is relocating. Hedda is headhunted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is sponsored plus has a diploma: then it is certified. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is fingerprinted: then it has a portfolio. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is headhunted plus is relocating plus is sponsored: then it is seasoned. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is sponsored plus is probationary plus has a diploma: then it is freelance. Policy I is waived if that candidate is probationary. Question: Which choice is right for Hedda?", "options": ["is freelance", "is certified"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is certified", "unit_id": "u005413", "pair_id": "u005413-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005413-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fcd856c8a1cadffc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005413-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda is sponsored. Hedda has a diploma. Hedda is relocating. Hedda is headhunted. Hedda is probationary.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is sponsored plus has a diploma: then it is certified. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is fingerprinted: then it has a portfolio. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is headhunted plus is relocating plus is sponsored: then it is seasoned. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is sponsored plus is probationary plus has a diploma: then it is freelance. Policy I is waived if that candidate is probationary. Question: Which choice is right for Hedda?", "options": ["is freelance", "is certified"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is freelance", "unit_id": "u005413", "pair_id": "u005413-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005413-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "78444af625fe804a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005413-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda is sponsored. Hedda has a diploma. Hedda is relocating. Hedda is headhunted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is sponsored and additionally has a diploma, it then is certified. #2 Each time a candidate is fingerprinted, it then has a portfolio. #3 Each time a candidate is headhunted and additionally is relocating and additionally is sponsored, it then is seasoned. #4 Each time a candidate is sponsored and additionally is probationary and additionally has a diploma, it then is freelance. #1 is set aside if a candidate is probationary. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Hedda?", "options": ["is freelance", "is certified"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is certified", "unit_id": "u005413", "pair_id": "u005413-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005413-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fcd856c8a1cadffc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005413-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda is sponsored. Hedda has a diploma. Hedda is relocating. Hedda is headhunted. Hedda is probationary.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is sponsored and additionally has a diploma, it then is certified. #2 Each time a candidate is fingerprinted, it then has a portfolio. #3 Each time a candidate is headhunted and additionally is relocating and additionally is sponsored, it then is seasoned. #4 Each time a candidate is sponsored and additionally is probationary and additionally has a diploma, it then is freelance. #1 is set aside if a candidate is probationary. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Hedda?", "options": ["is freelance", "is certified"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is freelance", "unit_id": "u005413", "pair_id": "u005413-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005413-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "78444af625fe804a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005450-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Greta is not garnished. Bastien is garnished. Bastien is pensioned. Evren is overdrawn. Evren is amortized. Evren is pensioned. Greta is not creditworthy. Greta is not pensioned. Evren is not underwritten. Greta is overdrawn. Greta has a cosigner. Evren has a cosigner. Evren is not garnished. Bastien is amortized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is pensioned, thus it is not indebted. Provision 2: when the borrower here is solvent, thus it has a guarantor. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a cosigner, thus it is not delinquent. Provision 4: when the borrower here has a guarantor while is audited while is overdrawn, thus it is delinquent. Provision 5: when the borrower here is not garnished, thus it is audited. Provision 6: when the borrower here has a guarantor while is amortized while is overdrawn, thus it has an escrow account. Provision 7: when the borrower here is pensioned, thus it is solvent. Provision 8: when the borrower here is creditworthy while has a cosigner while is pensioned, thus it is indebted. Provision 9: when the borrower here is audited, thus it has no escrow account. Provision 6 has no effect when the borrower here is creditworthy. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Which one describes Evren?", "options": ["is delinquent", "has an escrow account"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is delinquent", "unit_id": "u005450", "pair_id": "u005450-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005450-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8e688acf122124d1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a3"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005450-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Greta is not garnished. Bastien is garnished. Bastien is pensioned. Evren is overdrawn. Evren is amortized. Evren is pensioned. Greta is not creditworthy. Greta is not pensioned. Evren is not underwritten. Greta is overdrawn. Greta has a cosigner. Evren has a cosigner. Evren is not garnished. Bastien is amortized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is pensioned, thus it is not indebted. Provision 2: when the borrower here is solvent, thus it has a guarantor. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a cosigner, thus it is not delinquent. Provision 4: when the borrower here has a guarantor while is audited while is overdrawn, thus it is delinquent. Provision 5: when the borrower here is garnished, thus it is audited. Provision 6: when the borrower here has a guarantor while is amortized while is overdrawn, thus it has an escrow account. Provision 7: when the borrower here is pensioned, thus it is solvent. Provision 8: when the borrower here is creditworthy while has a cosigner while is pensioned, thus it is indebted. Provision 9: when the borrower here is audited, thus it has no escrow account. Provision 6 has no effect when the borrower here is creditworthy. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Which one describes Evren?", "options": ["is delinquent", "has an escrow account"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has an escrow account", "unit_id": "u005450", "pair_id": "u005450-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005450-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d9ff260633d22679", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a3"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005455-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh has no locker slot. Kaveh is not weighed. Kaveh has a courier. Kaveh has no waybill. Kaveh is fragile. Kaveh is not scanned.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is not registered and is perishable, then it is palletized. (2) If a parcel is not registered and is not perishable, then it is refrigerated. (3) If a parcel is not undeliverable, then it is not registered. (4) If a parcel is not registered and is damaged and is not fragile, then it is labeled. (5) If a parcel is not registered and has no courier, then it is stamped. (6) If a parcel is scanned, then it is not tracked. (7) If a parcel is not registered and is not weighed, then it is consolidated. (8) If a parcel is not registered and has no locker slot, then it is delayed. (9) If a parcel has no courier, then it is not labeled. (10) If a parcel has no waybill, then it is not undeliverable. (8) is void if the parcel is not weighed. When (9) and (4) clash, (9) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Kaveh?", "options": ["is stamped", "is palletized", "is refrigerated", "is consolidated", "is delayed", "is labeled"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is consolidated", "unit_id": "u005455", "pair_id": "u005455-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005455-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "043da8ff0c1e113d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a7", "a2", "a1", "a0", "a16"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u005455-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh has no locker slot. Kaveh is weighed. Kaveh has a courier. Kaveh has no waybill. Kaveh is fragile. Kaveh is not scanned.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is not registered and is perishable, then it is palletized. (2) If a parcel is not registered and is not perishable, then it is refrigerated. (3) If a parcel is not undeliverable, then it is not registered. (4) If a parcel is not registered and is damaged and is not fragile, then it is labeled. (5) If a parcel is not registered and has no courier, then it is stamped. (6) If a parcel is scanned, then it is not tracked. (7) If a parcel is not registered and is not weighed, then it is consolidated. (8) If a parcel is not registered and has no locker slot, then it is delayed. (9) If a parcel has no courier, then it is not labeled. (10) If a parcel has no waybill, then it is not undeliverable. (8) is void if the parcel is not weighed. When (9) and (4) clash, (9) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Kaveh?", "options": ["is stamped", "is palletized", "is refrigerated", "is consolidated", "is delayed", "is labeled"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is delayed", "unit_id": "u005455", "pair_id": "u005455-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005455-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "089d638c955773f9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a7", "a2", "a1", "a0", "a16"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u005455-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh has no locker slot. Kaveh is not weighed. Kaveh has a courier. Kaveh has no waybill. Kaveh is fragile. Kaveh is not scanned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is not registered and also is perishable, it also is palletized. Clause 2: once any parcel is not registered and also is not perishable, it also is refrigerated. Clause 3: once any parcel is not undeliverable, it also is not registered. Clause 4: once any parcel is not registered and also is damaged and also is not fragile, it also is labeled. Clause 5: once any parcel is not registered and also has no courier, it also is stamped. Clause 6: once any parcel is scanned, it also is not tracked. Clause 7: once any parcel is not registered and also is not weighed, it also is consolidated. Clause 8: once any parcel is not registered and also has no locker slot, it also is delayed. Clause 9: once any parcel has no courier, it also is not labeled. Clause 10: once any parcel has no waybill, it also is not undeliverable. Clause 8 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is not weighed. Clause 9 overrides Clause 4. Question: Which of these is true of Kaveh?", "options": ["is stamped", "is palletized", "is refrigerated", "is consolidated", "is delayed", "is labeled"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is consolidated", "unit_id": "u005455", "pair_id": "u005455-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005455-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "043da8ff0c1e113d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a7", "a2", "a1", "a0", "a16"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u005455-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh has no locker slot. Kaveh is weighed. Kaveh has a courier. Kaveh has no waybill. Kaveh is fragile. Kaveh is not scanned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is not registered and also is perishable, it also is palletized. Clause 2: once any parcel is not registered and also is not perishable, it also is refrigerated. Clause 3: once any parcel is not undeliverable, it also is not registered. Clause 4: once any parcel is not registered and also is damaged and also is not fragile, it also is labeled. Clause 5: once any parcel is not registered and also has no courier, it also is stamped. Clause 6: once any parcel is scanned, it also is not tracked. Clause 7: once any parcel is not registered and also is not weighed, it also is consolidated. Clause 8: once any parcel is not registered and also has no locker slot, it also is delayed. Clause 9: once any parcel has no courier, it also is not labeled. Clause 10: once any parcel has no waybill, it also is not undeliverable. Clause 8 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is not weighed. Clause 9 overrides Clause 4. Question: Which of these is true of Kaveh?", "options": ["is stamped", "is palletized", "is refrigerated", "is consolidated", "is delayed", "is labeled"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is delayed", "unit_id": "u005455", "pair_id": "u005455-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005455-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "089d638c955773f9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a7", "a2", "a1", "a0", "a16"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u005455-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh has no locker slot. Kaveh is not weighed. Kaveh has a courier. Kaveh has no waybill. Kaveh is fragile. Kaveh is not scanned.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is not registered, and is perishable, that parcel is palletized. Item B. When the parcel is not registered, and is not perishable, that parcel is refrigerated. Item C. When the parcel is not undeliverable, that parcel is not registered. Item D. When the parcel is not registered, and is damaged, and is not fragile, that parcel is labeled. Item E. When the parcel is not registered, and has no courier, that parcel is stamped. Item F. When the parcel is scanned, that parcel is not tracked. Item G. When the parcel is not registered, and is not weighed, that parcel is consolidated. Item H. When the parcel is not registered, and has no locker slot, that parcel is delayed. Item I. When the parcel has no courier, that parcel is not labeled. Item J. When the parcel has no waybill, that parcel is not undeliverable. Item H is suspended when the parcel is not weighed. Item I outranks Item D. Question: What applies to Kaveh?", "options": ["is stamped", "is palletized", "is refrigerated", "is consolidated", "is delayed", "is labeled"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is consolidated", "unit_id": "u005455", "pair_id": "u005455-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005455-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "043da8ff0c1e113d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a7", "a2", "a1", "a0", "a16"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u005455-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh has no locker slot. Kaveh is weighed. Kaveh has a courier. Kaveh has no waybill. Kaveh is fragile. Kaveh is not scanned.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is not registered, and is perishable, that parcel is palletized. Item B. When the parcel is not registered, and is not perishable, that parcel is refrigerated. Item C. When the parcel is not undeliverable, that parcel is not registered. Item D. When the parcel is not registered, and is damaged, and is not fragile, that parcel is labeled. Item E. When the parcel is not registered, and has no courier, that parcel is stamped. Item F. When the parcel is scanned, that parcel is not tracked. Item G. When the parcel is not registered, and is not weighed, that parcel is consolidated. Item H. When the parcel is not registered, and has no locker slot, that parcel is delayed. Item I. When the parcel has no courier, that parcel is not labeled. Item J. When the parcel has no waybill, that parcel is not undeliverable. Item H is suspended when the parcel is not weighed. Item I outranks Item D. Question: What applies to Kaveh?", "options": ["is stamped", "is palletized", "is refrigerated", "is consolidated", "is delayed", "is labeled"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is delayed", "unit_id": "u005455", "pair_id": "u005455-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005455-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "089d638c955773f9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a7", "a2", "a1", "a0", "a16"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u005470-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is not experimental. Shale is tagged. Shale has a patch cycle of 83. Quartz is not reverted. Feldspar is experimental. Feldspar is compiled. Quartz is tagged. Feldspar is merged. Shale is reverted. Feldspar is not tagged. Obsidian is not compiled. Shale is not compiled. Quartz is versioned. Feldspar is reverted. Shale is profiled. Obsidian is tagged. Quartz is not compiled. Quartz has a patch cycle of 27. Shale is merged. Quartz is profiled. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is signed provided that it has a patch cycle exceeding 86. Section 2: a build is localized provided that it is tagged as well as is profiled. Section 3: a build is fuzzed provided that it is compiled as well as is reverted as well as is merged. Section 2 lapses for a build if it has a patch cycle of 83 or higher as well as is experimental. Question: Quartz is compiled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005470", "pair_id": "u005470-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/16/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005470-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "45d9c7181162ff0c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005470-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is not experimental. Shale is tagged. Shale has a patch cycle of 83. Quartz is not reverted. Feldspar is experimental. Feldspar is compiled. Quartz is tagged. Feldspar is merged. Shale is reverted. Feldspar is not tagged. Obsidian is not compiled. Shale is not compiled. Quartz is versioned. Feldspar is reverted. Shale is profiled. Obsidian is tagged. Quartz is compiled. Quartz has a patch cycle of 27. Shale is merged. Quartz is profiled. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is signed provided that it has a patch cycle exceeding 86. Section 2: a build is localized provided that it is tagged as well as is profiled. Section 3: a build is fuzzed provided that it is compiled as well as is reverted as well as is merged. Section 2 lapses for a build if it has a patch cycle of 83 or higher as well as is experimental. Question: Quartz is compiled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005470", "pair_id": "u005470-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/16/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005470-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a9c40d0d8fff4392", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005470-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is not experimental. Shale is tagged. Shale has a patch cycle of 83. Quartz is not reverted. Feldspar is experimental. Feldspar is compiled. Quartz is tagged. Feldspar is merged. Shale is reverted. Feldspar is not tagged. Obsidian is not compiled. Shale is not compiled. Quartz is versioned. Feldspar is reverted. Shale is profiled. Obsidian is tagged. Quartz is not compiled. Quartz has a patch cycle of 27. Shale is merged. Quartz is profiled. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a patch cycle higher than 86: then it is signed. Policy II. Suppose that build is tagged plus is profiled: then it is localized. Policy III. Suppose that build is compiled plus is reverted plus is merged: then it is fuzzed. Policy II is waived if that build has a patch cycle no lower than 83 plus is experimental. Question: Is it so that Quartz is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005470", "pair_id": "u005470-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/16/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005470-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "45d9c7181162ff0c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005470-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is not experimental. Shale is tagged. Shale has a patch cycle of 83. Quartz is not reverted. Feldspar is experimental. Feldspar is compiled. Quartz is tagged. Feldspar is merged. Shale is reverted. Feldspar is not tagged. Obsidian is not compiled. Shale is not compiled. Quartz is versioned. Feldspar is reverted. Shale is profiled. Obsidian is tagged. Quartz is compiled. Quartz has a patch cycle of 27. Shale is merged. Quartz is profiled. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a patch cycle higher than 86: then it is signed. Policy II. Suppose that build is tagged plus is profiled: then it is localized. Policy III. Suppose that build is compiled plus is reverted plus is merged: then it is fuzzed. Policy II is waived if that build has a patch cycle no lower than 83 plus is experimental. Question: Is it so that Quartz is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005470", "pair_id": "u005470-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/16/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005470-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a9c40d0d8fff4392", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005470-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is not experimental. Shale is tagged. Shale has a patch cycle of 83. Quartz is not reverted. Feldspar is experimental. Feldspar is compiled. Quartz is tagged. Feldspar is merged. Shale is reverted. Feldspar is not tagged. Obsidian is not compiled. Shale is not compiled. Quartz is versioned. Feldspar is reverted. Shale is profiled. Obsidian is tagged. Quartz is not compiled. Quartz has a patch cycle of 27. Shale is merged. Quartz is profiled. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a patch cycle greater than 86, it then is signed. #2 Each time a build is tagged and additionally is profiled, it then is localized. #3 Each time a build is compiled and additionally is reverted and additionally is merged, it then is fuzzed. #2 is set aside if a build has a patch cycle of 83 or above and additionally is experimental. Question: Do the terms above show that Quartz is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005470", "pair_id": "u005470-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/16/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005470-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "45d9c7181162ff0c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005470-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is not experimental. Shale is tagged. Shale has a patch cycle of 83. Quartz is not reverted. Feldspar is experimental. Feldspar is compiled. Quartz is tagged. Feldspar is merged. Shale is reverted. Feldspar is not tagged. Obsidian is not compiled. Shale is not compiled. Quartz is versioned. Feldspar is reverted. Shale is profiled. Obsidian is tagged. Quartz is compiled. Quartz has a patch cycle of 27. Shale is merged. Quartz is profiled. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a patch cycle greater than 86, it then is signed. #2 Each time a build is tagged and additionally is profiled, it then is localized. #3 Each time a build is compiled and additionally is reverted and additionally is merged, it then is fuzzed. #2 is set aside if a build has a patch cycle of 83 or above and additionally is experimental. Question: Do the terms above show that Quartz is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005470", "pair_id": "u005470-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/16/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005470-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a9c40d0d8fff4392", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005509-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has no adjuster. Zdenek is not appraised. Zdenek is a smoker. Zdenek has no deductible waiver. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Zdenek has no beneficiary. Zdenek is not disputed. Zdenek is litigated. Zdenek is reinstated. Zdenek has no premium discount.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is not indemnified while is disputed, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is not indemnified while is not disputed while is covered, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has an adjuster, thus it has no flood coverage. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is a claimant while has no beneficiary, thus it is not indemnified. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is not reinstated, thus it is inspected. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is not appraised while is litigated, thus it is covered. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is grandfathered while has no beneficiary, thus it is indemnified. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is not a claimant while has no roadside assistance, thus it has flood coverage. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has no adjuster while is uninsurable while is a smoker, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Zdenek is reimbursed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005509", "pair_id": "u005509-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005509-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7ed2e1e000674302", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a15", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005509-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has no adjuster. Zdenek is not appraised. Zdenek is a smoker. Zdenek has no deductible waiver. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Zdenek has no beneficiary. Zdenek is not disputed. Zdenek is litigated. Zdenek is reinstated. Zdenek has no premium discount.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is a smoker while has no premium discount while has no deductible waiver, thus it is a claimant. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is not indemnified while is disputed, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is not indemnified while is not disputed while is covered, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has an adjuster, thus it has no flood coverage. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is a claimant while has no beneficiary, thus it is not indemnified. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is not reinstated, thus it is inspected. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is not appraised while is litigated, thus it is covered. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is grandfathered while has no beneficiary, thus it is indemnified. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is not a claimant while has no roadside assistance, thus it has flood coverage. Provision 10: when the policyholder here has no adjuster while is uninsurable while is a smoker, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Zdenek is reimbursed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005509", "pair_id": "u005509-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005509-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "656f993bc85773f5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a15", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005509-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has no adjuster. Zdenek is not appraised. Zdenek is a smoker. Zdenek has no deductible waiver. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Zdenek has no beneficiary. Zdenek is not disputed. Zdenek is litigated. Zdenek is reinstated. Zdenek has no premium discount.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is not indemnified and likewise is disputed, so it is not reimbursed. No. 2 While the given policyholder is not indemnified and likewise is not disputed and likewise is covered, so it is reimbursed. No. 3 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it has no flood coverage. No. 4 While the given policyholder is a claimant and likewise has no beneficiary, so it is not indemnified. No. 5 While the given policyholder is not reinstated, so it is inspected. No. 6 While the given policyholder is not appraised and likewise is litigated, so it is covered. No. 7 While the given policyholder is grandfathered and likewise has no beneficiary, so it is indemnified. No. 8 While the given policyholder is not a claimant and likewise has no roadside assistance, so it has flood coverage. No. 9 While the given policyholder has no adjuster and likewise is uninsurable and likewise is a smoker, so it is grandfathered. No. 8 wins over No. 3. No. 7 wins over No. 4. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Zdenek is reimbursed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005509", "pair_id": "u005509-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005509-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7ed2e1e000674302", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a15", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005509-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has no adjuster. Zdenek is not appraised. Zdenek is a smoker. Zdenek has no deductible waiver. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Zdenek has no beneficiary. Zdenek is not disputed. Zdenek is litigated. Zdenek is reinstated. Zdenek has no premium discount.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is a smoker and likewise has no premium discount and likewise has no deductible waiver, so it is a claimant. No. 2 While the given policyholder is not indemnified and likewise is disputed, so it is not reimbursed. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not indemnified and likewise is not disputed and likewise is covered, so it is reimbursed. No. 4 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it has no flood coverage. No. 5 While the given policyholder is a claimant and likewise has no beneficiary, so it is not indemnified. No. 6 While the given policyholder is not reinstated, so it is inspected. No. 7 While the given policyholder is not appraised and likewise is litigated, so it is covered. No. 8 While the given policyholder is grandfathered and likewise has no beneficiary, so it is indemnified. No. 9 While the given policyholder is not a claimant and likewise has no roadside assistance, so it has flood coverage. No. 10 While the given policyholder has no adjuster and likewise is uninsurable and likewise is a smoker, so it is grandfathered. No. 9 wins over No. 4. No. 8 wins over No. 5. No. 3 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Zdenek is reimbursed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005509", "pair_id": "u005509-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005509-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "656f993bc85773f5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a15", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005526-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not reproducible. Gneiss has a defect tally of 1. Quartz has a defect tally of 79. Gneiss is not reproducible. Gneiss has no security advisory.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is backported, thus it is not merged. Provision 2: when the build here has no security advisory, thus it is versioned. Provision 3: when the build here has no security advisory, thus it is not profiled. Provision 4: when the build here is experimental, thus it is merged. Provision 5: when the build here is reproducible, thus it is fuzzed. Provision 6: when the build here has a defect tally beneath 71, thus it is not backported. Provision 7: when the build here has a lint backlog beneath 62, thus it is not fuzzed. Provision 8: when the build here has a defect tally beneath 10, thus it is not versioned. Provision 9: when the build here is not profiled, thus it is backported. Provision 10: when the build here is versioned, thus it is experimental. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 9. Question: Would it be right to say that Gneiss is merged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005526", "pair_id": "u005526-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005526-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "aeaf61575369e066", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005526-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not reproducible. Gneiss has a defect tally of 1. Quartz has a defect tally of 79. Gneiss is not reproducible. Gneiss has no security advisory.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is backported, thus it is not merged. Provision 2: when the build here has no security advisory, thus it is versioned. Provision 3: when the build here has no security advisory, thus it is not profiled. Provision 4: when the build here is experimental, thus it is merged. Provision 5: when the build here is reproducible, thus it is fuzzed. Provision 6: when the build here has a defect tally beneath 71, thus it is not backported. Provision 7: when the build here has a lint backlog beneath 62, thus it is not fuzzed. Provision 8: when the build here has a defect tally beneath 10, thus it is not versioned. Provision 9: when the build here is not profiled, thus it is backported. Provision 10: when the build here is versioned, thus it is experimental. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Would it be right to say that Gneiss is merged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005526", "pair_id": "u005526-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005526-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "23e6e824c98bbf55", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005535-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz has a test yield of 75. Mica is not linted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is not tagged, thus it is not fuzzed. Provision 2: when the build here is signed, thus it has a migration script. Provision 3: when the build here is linted, thus it is flaky. Provision 4: when the build here has a changelog, thus it is benchmarked. Provision 5: when the build here is not compiled, thus it is signed. Provision 6: when the build here has a test yield at or below 76, thus it is fuzzed. Provision 7: when the build here has a test yield at or below 66, thus it is not signed. Provision 8: when the build here has a test yield beyond 76, thus it is not compiled. Provision 9: when the build here is tagged, thus it is backported. Provision 10: when the build here is fuzzed, thus it has a changelog. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Which one describes Quartz?", "options": ["has a migration script", "is benchmarked"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is benchmarked", "unit_id": "u005535", "pair_id": "u005535-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005535-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9af0f5043a438a7d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005535-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz has a test yield of 52. Mica is not linted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is not tagged, thus it is not fuzzed. Provision 2: when the build here is signed, thus it has a migration script. Provision 3: when the build here is linted, thus it is flaky. Provision 4: when the build here has a changelog, thus it is benchmarked. Provision 5: when the build here is not compiled, thus it is signed. Provision 6: when the build here has a test yield at or below 76, thus it is fuzzed. Provision 7: when the build here has a test yield at or below 66, thus it is not signed. Provision 8: when the build here has a test yield beyond 76, thus it is not compiled. Provision 9: when the build here is tagged, thus it is backported. Provision 10: when the build here is fuzzed, thus it has a changelog. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Which one describes Quartz?", "options": ["has a migration script", "is benchmarked"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is benchmarked", "unit_id": "u005535", "pair_id": "u005535-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005535-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1cb8a823760bc955", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005535-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz has a test yield of 75. Mica is not linted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is not tagged, it thereby is not fuzzed. Point B. If said build is signed, it thereby has a migration script. Point C. If said build is linted, it thereby is flaky. Point D. If said build has a changelog, it thereby is benchmarked. Point E. If said build is not compiled, it thereby is signed. Point F. If said build has a test yield of maximum 76, it thereby is fuzzed. Point G. If said build has a test yield of maximum 66, it thereby is not signed. Point H. If said build has a test yield in excess of 76, it thereby is not compiled. Point I. If said build is tagged, it thereby is backported. Point J. If said build is fuzzed, it thereby has a changelog. Point E supersedes Point G. Point A supersedes Point F. Question: Which choice is true for Quartz?", "options": ["has a migration script", "is benchmarked"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is benchmarked", "unit_id": "u005535", "pair_id": "u005535-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005535-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9af0f5043a438a7d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005535-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz has a test yield of 52. Mica is not linted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is not tagged, it thereby is not fuzzed. Point B. If said build is signed, it thereby has a migration script. Point C. If said build is linted, it thereby is flaky. Point D. If said build has a changelog, it thereby is benchmarked. Point E. If said build is not compiled, it thereby is signed. Point F. If said build has a test yield of maximum 76, it thereby is fuzzed. Point G. If said build has a test yield of maximum 66, it thereby is not signed. Point H. If said build has a test yield in excess of 76, it thereby is not compiled. Point I. If said build is tagged, it thereby is backported. Point J. If said build is fuzzed, it thereby has a changelog. Point E supersedes Point G. Point A supersedes Point F. Question: Which choice is true for Quartz?", "options": ["has a migration script", "is benchmarked"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is benchmarked", "unit_id": "u005535", "pair_id": "u005535-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005535-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1cb8a823760bc955", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005552-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is foreclosed.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is underwritten, then it has a cosigner. (2) If a borrower is not vetted, then it is a homeowner. Question: Is it true that Evren is foreclosed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005552", "pair_id": "u005552-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005552-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "60c955cb701b5949", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005552-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is foreclosed. Evren is not vetted.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is underwritten, then it has a cosigner. (2) If a borrower is not vetted, then it is a homeowner. Question: Is it true that Evren is foreclosed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005552", "pair_id": "u005552-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005552-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "46c01336b322b3be", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005552-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is underwritten, it also has a cosigner. Clause 2: once any borrower is not vetted, it also is a homeowner. Question: Does it follow that Evren is foreclosed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005552", "pair_id": "u005552-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005552-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "60c955cb701b5949", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005552-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is foreclosed. Evren is not vetted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is underwritten, it also has a cosigner. Clause 2: once any borrower is not vetted, it also is a homeowner. Question: Does it follow that Evren is foreclosed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005552", "pair_id": "u005552-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005552-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "46c01336b322b3be", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005552-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is underwritten, that borrower has a cosigner. Item B. When the borrower is not vetted, that borrower is a homeowner. Question: Can one infer that Evren is foreclosed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005552", "pair_id": "u005552-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005552-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "60c955cb701b5949", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005552-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is foreclosed. Evren is not vetted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is underwritten, that borrower has a cosigner. Item B. When the borrower is not vetted, that borrower is a homeowner. Question: Can one infer that Evren is foreclosed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005552", "pair_id": "u005552-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005552-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "46c01336b322b3be", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005560-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is lapsed. Yara is inspected. Xaver has a peril factor of 33. Wanda is not a smoker. Yara has a peril factor of 66. Yara is not a smoker. Yara has a payout ceiling of 93. Yara has a claim frequency of 47. Yara is litigated. Wanda has a peril factor of 88. Wanda is litigated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a peril factor over 65, it also is retired. Clause 2: once any policyholder is lapsed and also has a payout ceiling over 62, it also is not reinstated. Clause 3: once any policyholder is retired, it also is subrogated. Clause 4: once any policyholder is subrogated and also has a claim frequency over 46, it also is not a claimant. Clause 5: once any policyholder is subrogated and also has a claim frequency of 46 or less and also is inspected, it also is a claimant. Clause 3 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is a smoker and also is litigated. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Yara is a claimant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005560", "pair_id": "u005560-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005560-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "922a515c47af3a88", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005560-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is lapsed. Yara is inspected. Xaver has a peril factor of 33. Wanda is not a smoker. Yara has a peril factor of 66. Yara is not a smoker. Yara has a payout ceiling of 93. Yara has a claim frequency of 16. Yara is litigated. Wanda has a peril factor of 88. Wanda is litigated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a peril factor over 65, it also is retired. Clause 2: once any policyholder is lapsed and also has a payout ceiling over 62, it also is not reinstated. Clause 3: once any policyholder is retired, it also is subrogated. Clause 4: once any policyholder is subrogated and also has a claim frequency over 46, it also is not a claimant. Clause 5: once any policyholder is subrogated and also has a claim frequency of 46 or less and also is inspected, it also is a claimant. Clause 3 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is a smoker and also is litigated. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Yara is a claimant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005560", "pair_id": "u005560-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005560-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "915eb212b71a0996", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005602-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is triaged. Cosima is not discharged. Cosima is not vaccinated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is vaccinated, thus it is symptomatic. Provision 2: when the patient here is triaged, thus it is not symptomatic. Provision 3: when the patient here is triaged, thus it is referred. Provision 4: when the patient here is not discharged, thus it is not referred. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Cosima is referred?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005602", "pair_id": "u005602-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005602-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "946e007d5387ada1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u005602-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is triaged. Cosima is not discharged. Cosima is not vaccinated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is vaccinated, thus it is symptomatic. Provision 2: when the patient here is triaged, thus it is not symptomatic. Provision 3: when the patient here is triaged, thus it is referred. Provision 4: when the patient here is discharged, thus it is not referred. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Cosima is referred?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005602", "pair_id": "u005602-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005602-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "7955fa91579209c0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u005616-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not weighed. Ulla is not labeled. Ulla is not hazardous. Ulla is not stamped.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is not stamped, thus it has a locker slot. Provision 2: when the parcel here is labeled, thus it is registered. Provision 3: when the parcel here is registered, thus it is oversized. Provision 4: when the parcel here is hazardous, thus it is delayed. Provision 5: when the parcel here is oversized, thus it is damaged. Provision 6: when the parcel here is scanned, thus it is not damaged. Provision 7: when the parcel here is weighed, thus it is palletized. Provision 8: when the parcel here is delayed, thus it is scanned. Question: Would it be right to say that Ulla is damaged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005616", "pair_id": "u005616-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005616-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "02cf1859df837dd1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005616-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not weighed. Ulla is not labeled. Ulla is not hazardous. Ulla is not stamped.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is stamped, thus it has a locker slot. Provision 2: when the parcel here is labeled, thus it is registered. Provision 3: when the parcel here is registered, thus it is oversized. Provision 4: when the parcel here is hazardous, thus it is delayed. Provision 5: when the parcel here is oversized, thus it is damaged. Provision 6: when the parcel here is scanned, thus it is not damaged. Provision 7: when the parcel here is weighed, thus it is palletized. Provision 8: when the parcel here is delayed, thus it is scanned. Question: Would it be right to say that Ulla is damaged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005616", "pair_id": "u005616-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005616-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "9ef8ee0f808aa385", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005616-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not weighed. Ulla is not labeled. Ulla is not hazardous. Ulla is not stamped.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not stamped, it thereby has a locker slot. Point B. If said parcel is labeled, it thereby is registered. Point C. If said parcel is registered, it thereby is oversized. Point D. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby is delayed. Point E. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby is damaged. Point F. If said parcel is scanned, it thereby is not damaged. Point G. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby is palletized. Point H. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby is scanned. Question: Statement: Ulla is damaged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005616", "pair_id": "u005616-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005616-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "02cf1859df837dd1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005616-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not weighed. Ulla is not labeled. Ulla is not hazardous. Ulla is not stamped.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is stamped, it thereby has a locker slot. Point B. If said parcel is labeled, it thereby is registered. Point C. If said parcel is registered, it thereby is oversized. Point D. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby is delayed. Point E. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby is damaged. Point F. If said parcel is scanned, it thereby is not damaged. Point G. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby is palletized. Point H. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby is scanned. Question: Statement: Ulla is damaged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005616", "pair_id": "u005616-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005616-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "9ef8ee0f808aa385", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005683-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek has a pain level of 91. Benedek is not discharged. Aurel is not referred. Florin is referred. Aurel has a fever reading of 7. Florin has a fever reading of 58. Benedek has a fever reading of 5. Elif has a mobility rank of 14. Aurel has a mobility rank of 12. Florin has a pain level of 90. Aurel has a pulse rate of 39. Elif has a pulse rate of 56. Elif has a pain level of 96. Florin has a mobility rank of 72. Florin has a pulse rate of 74. Benedek has a pulse rate of 67.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient has a fever reading of no more than 66, and has a pulse rate of no less than 52, that patient is symptomatic. Item B. When the patient is discharged, that patient is not symptomatic. Item C. When the patient has a fever reading of no more than 66, and has a pain level of no less than 84, and has a pulse rate of less than 43, that patient is diabetic. Item D. When the patient is referred, that patient has no caregiver. Item E. When the patient has a fever reading of no more than 66, and is discharged, and has a pulse rate of no more than 71, that patient is admitted. Item F. When the patient has a fever reading of no more than 66, and has a pain level of less than 84, that patient is contagious. Item G. When the patient has a mobility rank of more than 71, that patient is asthmatic. Item H. When the patient is discharged, that patient is not asthmatic. Item H is suspended when the patient has a pain level of no more than 64. Item B outranks Item A. Item H outranks Item G. Question: What applies to Florin?", "options": ["is symptomatic", "is contagious", "is admitted", "is diabetic"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is symptomatic", "unit_id": "u005683", "pair_id": "u005683-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/13/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005683-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "64cec9da1ccf4c86", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a9", "a7", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005683-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek has a pain level of 91. Benedek is not discharged. Aurel is not referred. Florin is referred. Aurel has a fever reading of 7. Florin has a fever reading of 58. Benedek has a fever reading of 5. Elif has a mobility rank of 14. Aurel has a mobility rank of 12. Florin has a pain level of 90. Aurel has a pulse rate of 39. Elif has a pulse rate of 56. Elif has a pain level of 96. Florin has a mobility rank of 56. Florin has a pulse rate of 74. Benedek has a pulse rate of 67.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient has a fever reading of no more than 66, and has a pulse rate of no less than 52, that patient is symptomatic. Item B. When the patient is discharged, that patient is not symptomatic. Item C. When the patient has a fever reading of no more than 66, and has a pain level of no less than 84, and has a pulse rate of less than 43, that patient is diabetic. Item D. When the patient is referred, that patient has no caregiver. Item E. When the patient has a fever reading of no more than 66, and is discharged, and has a pulse rate of no more than 71, that patient is admitted. Item F. When the patient has a fever reading of no more than 66, and has a pain level of less than 84, that patient is contagious. Item G. When the patient has a mobility rank of more than 71, that patient is asthmatic. Item H. When the patient is discharged, that patient is not asthmatic. Item H is suspended when the patient has a pain level of no more than 64. Item B outranks Item A. Item H outranks Item G. Question: What applies to Florin?", "options": ["is symptomatic", "is contagious", "is admitted", "is diabetic"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is symptomatic", "unit_id": "u005683", "pair_id": "u005683-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/13/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005683-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "81d0559426bf166b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a9", "a7", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005689-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin has no barcode. Mirela is not weighed. Mirela has no barcode. Quentin is tracked. Quentin is not prepaid. Mirela is not prepaid. Quentin is not scanned. Mirela is not tracked. Nandor has no barcode.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is weighed, thus it is damaged. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a barcode, thus it has no courier. Provision 3: when the parcel here has a barcode, thus it is not damaged. Provision 4: when the parcel here is not prepaid, thus it is not rerouted. Provision 5: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it is not registered. Provision 6: when the parcel here is weighed, thus it is registered. Provision 7: when the parcel here is not rerouted, thus it is misrouted. Provision 8: when the parcel here is scanned, thus it is rerouted. Provision 9: when the parcel here is tracked, thus it has a courier. Provision 10: when the parcel here is not rerouted, thus it is not misrouted. Provision 8 has no effect when the parcel here has no barcode. Provision 10 has no effect when the parcel here has no barcode. Provision 9 has no effect when the parcel here is prepaid. Provision 7 has no effect when the parcel here has a barcode. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Quentin is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005689", "pair_id": "u005689-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005689-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d1247acdfb9aec80", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005689-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin has no barcode. Mirela is not weighed. Mirela has no barcode. Quentin is tracked. Quentin is not prepaid. Mirela is not prepaid. Quentin is not scanned. Mirela is not tracked. Nandor has no barcode.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is weighed, thus it is damaged. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a barcode, thus it has no courier. Provision 3: when the parcel here has a barcode, thus it is not damaged. Provision 4: when the parcel here is prepaid, thus it is not rerouted. Provision 5: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it is not registered. Provision 6: when the parcel here is weighed, thus it is registered. Provision 7: when the parcel here is not rerouted, thus it is misrouted. Provision 8: when the parcel here is scanned, thus it is rerouted. Provision 9: when the parcel here is tracked, thus it has a courier. Provision 10: when the parcel here is not rerouted, thus it is not misrouted. Provision 8 has no effect when the parcel here has no barcode. Provision 10 has no effect when the parcel here has no barcode. Provision 9 has no effect when the parcel here is prepaid. Provision 7 has no effect when the parcel here has a barcode. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Quentin is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005689", "pair_id": "u005689-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005689-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "89071c218c50095a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005703-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is probationary. Noor has a visa. Kalle has a portfolio. Kalle is not probationary. Kalle has no mentor. Lotte has no visa. Noor is probationary. Lotte has no portfolio. Kalle has no visa. Noor has a portfolio.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is bilingual, thus it has a signing bonus. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a portfolio, thus it is onboarded. Provision 3: when the candidate here has no visa, thus it is not bilingual. Provision 4: when the candidate here is probationary, thus it is not onboarded. Provision 5: when the candidate here has no visa, thus it is bilingual. Provision 6: when the candidate here has no mentor, thus it is unionized. Provision 7: when the candidate here is bilingual, thus it has no signing bonus. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is probationary. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here has a portfolio. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here is not probationary. Provision 7 has no effect when the candidate here is probationary. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Would it be right to say that Kalle has a signing bonus?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005703", "pair_id": "u005703-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005703-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2b3649774bfd85f0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u005703-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is probationary. Noor has a visa. Kalle has a portfolio. Kalle is not probationary. Kalle has no mentor. Lotte has no visa. Noor is probationary. Lotte has no portfolio. Kalle has no visa. Noor has a portfolio.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is bilingual, thus it has a signing bonus. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a portfolio, thus it is onboarded. Provision 3: when the candidate here has no visa, thus it is not bilingual. Provision 4: when the candidate here is probationary, thus it is not onboarded. Provision 5: when the candidate here has a visa, thus it is bilingual. Provision 6: when the candidate here has no mentor, thus it is unionized. Provision 7: when the candidate here is bilingual, thus it has no signing bonus. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is probationary. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here has a portfolio. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here is not probationary. Provision 7 has no effect when the candidate here is probationary. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Would it be right to say that Kalle has a signing bonus?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005703", "pair_id": "u005703-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005703-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d2bf9ff0eae700b5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u005710-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Olek is licensed. Ivo has a diploma. Olek is not headhunted. Ivo is recommended. Ivo is not headhunted. Ivo is licensed. Ivo is not a graduate.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has no diploma and likewise is unionized, so it is interviewed. No. 2 While the given candidate is not bonded, so it is seasoned. No. 3 While the given candidate is seasoned and likewise is onboarded, so it is bilingual. No. 4 While the given candidate is seasoned and likewise is not a graduate and likewise is recommended, so it has a background screening. No. 5 While the given candidate is not licensed, so it has no background screening. No. 6 While the given candidate is not headhunted, so it is not bonded. No. 7 While the given candidate is seasoned and likewise is not licensed, so it is fingerprinted. No. 8 While the given candidate is seasoned and likewise is freelance and likewise is unionized, so it is relocating. No. 9 While the given candidate is seasoned and likewise is not freelance, so it has a portfolio. No. 5 wins over No. 4. Question: Select what holds for Ivo: which option?", "options": ["is fingerprinted", "is relocating", "has a portfolio", "is bilingual", "has a background screening"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a background screening", "unit_id": "u005710", "pair_id": "u005710-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005710-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "32cd6e10b797d57f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a15", "a4", "a14", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u005710-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Olek is licensed. Ivo has no diploma. Olek is not headhunted. Ivo is recommended. Ivo is not headhunted. Ivo is licensed. Ivo is not a graduate.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has no diploma and likewise is unionized, so it is interviewed. No. 2 While the given candidate is not bonded, so it is seasoned. No. 3 While the given candidate is seasoned and likewise is onboarded, so it is bilingual. No. 4 While the given candidate is seasoned and likewise is not a graduate and likewise is recommended, so it has a background screening. No. 5 While the given candidate is not licensed, so it has no background screening. No. 6 While the given candidate is not headhunted, so it is not bonded. No. 7 While the given candidate is seasoned and likewise is not licensed, so it is fingerprinted. No. 8 While the given candidate is seasoned and likewise is freelance and likewise is unionized, so it is relocating. No. 9 While the given candidate is seasoned and likewise is not freelance, so it has a portfolio. No. 5 wins over No. 4. Question: Select what holds for Ivo: which option?", "options": ["is fingerprinted", "is relocating", "has a portfolio", "is bilingual", "has a background screening"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a background screening", "unit_id": "u005710", "pair_id": "u005710-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005710-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9c1dc790176aad86", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a15", "a4", "a14", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u005742-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri has a payout ceiling of 11. Una has an adjuster. Yara has a claim frequency of 5. Xaver has an adjuster. Xaver is not retired. Xaver has a claim frequency of 59. Yara has a payout ceiling of 93. Una has a peril factor of 29. Yara has no dashcam. Xaver is not indemnified. Una has a premium band of 24. Xaver has a premium band of 12. Una is not indemnified. Dmitri has a peril factor of 79. Yara has a peril factor of 77. Una has a payout ceiling of 52.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a payout ceiling of at most 43, then it is inspected. (2) If a policyholder is indemnified, then it has a deductible waiver. (3) If a policyholder has an adjuster, then it is litigated. (4) If a policyholder has a premium band of at most 19, then it is a smoker. (5) If a policyholder has a claim frequency below 60, then it has a rider. (6) If a policyholder is retired, then it is bundled. (7) If a policyholder has a payout ceiling above 43, then it is appraised. (8) If a policyholder has a dashcam, then it is reimbursed. (9) If a policyholder has a premium band above 19, then it is covered. (10) If a policyholder has a peril factor above 64, then it is uninsurable. (10) is void if the policyholder is retired. (5) is void if the policyholder is indemnified. (8) is void if the policyholder is indemnified. Question: Which option holds for Xaver?", "options": ["is inspected", "is covered", "is uninsurable", "is bundled", "has a deductible waiver", "is reimbursed", "is a smoker", "is appraised"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a smoker", "unit_id": "u005742", "pair_id": "u005742-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005742-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a622e0b2b29a4d02", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a1", "a5", "a13", "a3", "a16", "a2"]}, "attempt": 23}}
{"id": "syn-u005742-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri has a payout ceiling of 11. Una has an adjuster. Yara has a claim frequency of 5. Xaver has an adjuster. Xaver is not retired. Xaver has a claim frequency of 76. Yara has a payout ceiling of 93. Una has a peril factor of 29. Yara has no dashcam. Xaver is not indemnified. Una has a premium band of 24. Xaver has a premium band of 12. Una is not indemnified. Dmitri has a peril factor of 79. Yara has a peril factor of 77. Una has a payout ceiling of 52.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a payout ceiling of at most 43, then it is inspected. (2) If a policyholder is indemnified, then it has a deductible waiver. (3) If a policyholder has an adjuster, then it is litigated. (4) If a policyholder has a premium band of at most 19, then it is a smoker. (5) If a policyholder has a claim frequency below 60, then it has a rider. (6) If a policyholder is retired, then it is bundled. (7) If a policyholder has a payout ceiling above 43, then it is appraised. (8) If a policyholder has a dashcam, then it is reimbursed. (9) If a policyholder has a premium band above 19, then it is covered. (10) If a policyholder has a peril factor above 64, then it is uninsurable. (10) is void if the policyholder is retired. (5) is void if the policyholder is indemnified. (8) is void if the policyholder is indemnified. Question: Which option holds for Xaver?", "options": ["is inspected", "is covered", "is uninsurable", "is bundled", "has a deductible waiver", "is reimbursed", "is a smoker", "is appraised"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a smoker", "unit_id": "u005742", "pair_id": "u005742-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005742-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "dc0acd04564179e1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a1", "a5", "a13", "a3", "a16", "a2"]}, "attempt": 23}}
{"id": "syn-u005742-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri has a payout ceiling of 11. Una has an adjuster. Yara has a claim frequency of 5. Xaver has an adjuster. Xaver is not retired. Xaver has a claim frequency of 59. Yara has a payout ceiling of 93. Una has a peril factor of 29. Yara has no dashcam. Xaver is not indemnified. Una has a premium band of 24. Xaver has a premium band of 12. Una is not indemnified. Dmitri has a peril factor of 79. Yara has a peril factor of 77. Una has a payout ceiling of 52.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of no more than 43, that policyholder is inspected. Item B. When the policyholder is indemnified, that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Item C. When the policyholder has an adjuster, that policyholder is litigated. Item D. When the policyholder has a premium band of no more than 19, that policyholder is a smoker. Item E. When the policyholder has a claim frequency of less than 60, that policyholder has a rider. Item F. When the policyholder is retired, that policyholder is bundled. Item G. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of more than 43, that policyholder is appraised. Item H. When the policyholder has a dashcam, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item I. When the policyholder has a premium band of more than 19, that policyholder is covered. Item J. When the policyholder has a peril factor of more than 64, that policyholder is uninsurable. Item J is suspended when the policyholder is retired. Item E is suspended when the policyholder is indemnified. Item H is suspended when the policyholder is indemnified. Question: What applies to Xaver?", "options": ["is inspected", "is covered", "is uninsurable", "is bundled", "has a deductible waiver", "is reimbursed", "is a smoker", "is appraised"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a smoker", "unit_id": "u005742", "pair_id": "u005742-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005742-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a622e0b2b29a4d02", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a1", "a5", "a13", "a3", "a16", "a2"]}, "attempt": 23}}
{"id": "syn-u005742-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri has a payout ceiling of 11. Una has an adjuster. Yara has a claim frequency of 5. Xaver has an adjuster. Xaver is not retired. Xaver has a claim frequency of 76. Yara has a payout ceiling of 93. Una has a peril factor of 29. Yara has no dashcam. Xaver is not indemnified. Una has a premium band of 24. Xaver has a premium band of 12. Una is not indemnified. Dmitri has a peril factor of 79. Yara has a peril factor of 77. Una has a payout ceiling of 52.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of no more than 43, that policyholder is inspected. Item B. When the policyholder is indemnified, that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Item C. When the policyholder has an adjuster, that policyholder is litigated. Item D. When the policyholder has a premium band of no more than 19, that policyholder is a smoker. Item E. When the policyholder has a claim frequency of less than 60, that policyholder has a rider. Item F. When the policyholder is retired, that policyholder is bundled. Item G. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of more than 43, that policyholder is appraised. Item H. When the policyholder has a dashcam, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item I. When the policyholder has a premium band of more than 19, that policyholder is covered. Item J. When the policyholder has a peril factor of more than 64, that policyholder is uninsurable. Item J is suspended when the policyholder is retired. Item E is suspended when the policyholder is indemnified. Item H is suspended when the policyholder is indemnified. Question: What applies to Xaver?", "options": ["is inspected", "is covered", "is uninsurable", "is bundled", "has a deductible waiver", "is reimbursed", "is a smoker", "is appraised"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a smoker", "unit_id": "u005742", "pair_id": "u005742-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005742-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "dc0acd04564179e1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a1", "a5", "a13", "a3", "a16", "a2"]}, "attempt": 23}}
{"id": "syn-u005757-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora has a mobility rank of 38. Zora is waitlisted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is not diabetic provided that it is not waitlisted. Section 2: a patient is not rescheduled provided that it has a mobility rank of 83 or higher. Section 3: a patient is asthmatic provided that it has a mobility rank lower than 27. Question: Zora is bedridden. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005757", "pair_id": "u005757-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005757-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a413c407af5f9b12", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u005757-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora has a mobility rank of 38. Zora is bedridden. Zora is waitlisted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is not diabetic provided that it is not waitlisted. Section 2: a patient is not rescheduled provided that it has a mobility rank of 83 or higher. Section 3: a patient is asthmatic provided that it has a mobility rank lower than 27. Question: Zora is bedridden. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005757", "pair_id": "u005757-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005757-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "04581509d7e1ee30", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u005757-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora has a mobility rank of 38. Zora is waitlisted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is not waitlisted, it then is not diabetic. #2 Each time a patient has a mobility rank of 83 or above, it then is not rescheduled. #3 Each time a patient has a mobility rank less than 27, it then is asthmatic. Question: Do the terms above show that Zora is bedridden?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005757", "pair_id": "u005757-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005757-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a413c407af5f9b12", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u005757-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora has a mobility rank of 38. Zora is bedridden. Zora is waitlisted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is not waitlisted, it then is not diabetic. #2 Each time a patient has a mobility rank of 83 or above, it then is not rescheduled. #3 Each time a patient has a mobility rank less than 27, it then is asthmatic. Question: Do the terms above show that Zora is bedridden?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005757", "pair_id": "u005757-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005757-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "04581509d7e1ee30", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u005826-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is backed up. Zephyr has no GPU. Orrery is stateless. Zephyr is backed up.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is throttled provided that it has a GPU. Section 2: a workload is not throttled provided that it has a GPU. Section 3: a workload is not idle provided that it is stateless. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it has a replica count lower than 34. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it is backed up. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it has a replica count of 84 or lower. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it has a replica count of 34 or higher. Question: Orrery is throttled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005826", "pair_id": "u005826-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005826-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7f2839b8cb71804a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005826-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is backed up. Zephyr has no GPU. Orrery is stateless. Zephyr is backed up. Orrery has a GPU.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is throttled provided that it has a GPU. Section 2: a workload is not throttled provided that it has a GPU. Section 3: a workload is not idle provided that it is stateless. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it has a replica count lower than 34. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it is backed up. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it has a replica count of 84 or lower. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it has a replica count of 34 or higher. Question: Orrery is throttled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005826", "pair_id": "u005826-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005826-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "91fd41930d055a8e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005826-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is backed up. Zephyr has no GPU. Orrery is stateless. Zephyr is backed up.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload has a GPU: then it is throttled. Policy II. Suppose that workload has a GPU: then it is not throttled. Policy III. Suppose that workload is stateless: then it is not idle. Policy II is waived if that workload has a replica count smaller than 34. Policy II is waived if that workload is backed up. Policy I is waived if that workload has a replica count no higher than 84. Policy I is waived if that workload has a replica count no lower than 34. Question: Is it so that Orrery is throttled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005826", "pair_id": "u005826-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005826-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7f2839b8cb71804a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005826-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is backed up. Zephyr has no GPU. Orrery is stateless. Zephyr is backed up. Orrery has a GPU.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload has a GPU: then it is throttled. Policy II. Suppose that workload has a GPU: then it is not throttled. Policy III. Suppose that workload is stateless: then it is not idle. Policy II is waived if that workload has a replica count smaller than 34. Policy II is waived if that workload is backed up. Policy I is waived if that workload has a replica count no higher than 84. Policy I is waived if that workload has a replica count no lower than 34. Question: Is it so that Orrery is throttled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005826", "pair_id": "u005826-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005826-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "91fd41930d055a8e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005826-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is backed up. Zephyr has no GPU. Orrery is stateless. Zephyr is backed up.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is throttled. #2 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is not throttled. #3 Each time a workload is stateless, it then is not idle. #2 is set aside if a workload has a replica count less than 34. #2 is set aside if a workload is backed up. #1 is set aside if a workload has a replica count of 84 or below. #1 is set aside if a workload has a replica count of 34 or above. Question: Do the terms above show that Orrery is throttled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005826", "pair_id": "u005826-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005826-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7f2839b8cb71804a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005826-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is backed up. Zephyr has no GPU. Orrery is stateless. Zephyr is backed up. Orrery has a GPU.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is throttled. #2 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is not throttled. #3 Each time a workload is stateless, it then is not idle. #2 is set aside if a workload has a replica count less than 34. #2 is set aside if a workload is backed up. #1 is set aside if a workload has a replica count of 84 or below. #1 is set aside if a workload has a replica count of 34 or above. Question: Do the terms above show that Orrery is throttled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005826", "pair_id": "u005826-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005826-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "91fd41930d055a8e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005912-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra has a latency budget of 53. Borealis has no GPU. Sierra is not stateless. Quasar has no GPU. Sierra is not encrypted. Borealis is encrypted. Borealis is stateless. Sierra is isolated. Borealis has a latency budget of 56. Borealis is cached. Zephyr is not encrypted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is isolated, so it is not virtualized. No. 2 While the given workload is stateless, so it is idle. No. 3 While the given workload has a latency budget not above 73 and likewise has a GPU, so it is virtualized. No. 4 While the given workload is encrypted and likewise has a latency budget that falls below 48, so it has a failover node. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload is cached. No. 3 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Borealis is cached\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005912", "pair_id": "u005912-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005912-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ee315afa0cea9114", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005912-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra has a latency budget of 53. Borealis has no GPU. Sierra is not stateless. Quasar has no GPU. Sierra is not encrypted. Borealis is encrypted. Borealis is stateless. Sierra is isolated. Borealis has a latency budget of 56. Borealis is not cached. Zephyr is not encrypted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is isolated, so it is not virtualized. No. 2 While the given workload is stateless, so it is idle. No. 3 While the given workload has a latency budget not above 73 and likewise has a GPU, so it is virtualized. No. 4 While the given workload is encrypted and likewise has a latency budget that falls below 48, so it has a failover node. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload is cached. No. 3 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Borealis is cached\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005912", "pair_id": "u005912-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005912-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9b7c3b9c0bcdb9a2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005914-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Teodor has a commute radius of 59. Olek is not bonded. Lotte has no portfolio. Teodor has a seniority step of 85. Lotte has a commute radius of 2. Olek has a seniority step of 21. Lotte has a seniority step of 63.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has a seniority step at or below 55, thus it is a veteran. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a diploma, thus it has a visa. Provision 3: when the candidate here has a commute radius beneath 1, thus it is eligible. Provision 4: when the candidate here is recommended, thus it has a diploma. Provision 5: when the candidate here is eligible, thus it is interviewed. Provision 6: when the candidate here is bonded, thus it is recommended. Provision 7: when the candidate here has a portfolio, thus it is sponsored. Provision 8: when the candidate here is interviewed, thus it has no visa. Question: Would it be right to say that Lotte has a visa?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005914", "pair_id": "u005914-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005914-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "50b289a1f6d29b37", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005914-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Teodor has a commute radius of 59. Olek is not bonded. Lotte has no portfolio. Teodor has a seniority step of 85. Lotte has a commute radius of 2. Olek has a seniority step of 21. Lotte has a seniority step of 63.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has a seniority step at or below 55, thus it is a veteran. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a diploma, thus it has a visa. Provision 3: when the candidate here has a commute radius beneath 12, thus it is eligible. Provision 4: when the candidate here is recommended, thus it has a diploma. Provision 5: when the candidate here is eligible, thus it is interviewed. Provision 6: when the candidate here is bonded, thus it is recommended. Provision 7: when the candidate here has a portfolio, thus it is sponsored. Provision 8: when the candidate here is interviewed, thus it has no visa. Question: Would it be right to say that Lotte has a visa?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005914", "pair_id": "u005914-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005914-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "934a74b053460286", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005914-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Teodor has a commute radius of 59. Olek is not bonded. Lotte has no portfolio. Teodor has a seniority step of 85. Lotte has a commute radius of 2. Olek has a seniority step of 21. Lotte has a seniority step of 63.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a seniority step of maximum 55, it thereby is a veteran. Point B. If said candidate has a diploma, it thereby has a visa. Point C. If said candidate has a commute radius short of 1, it thereby is eligible. Point D. If said candidate is recommended, it thereby has a diploma. Point E. If said candidate is eligible, it thereby is interviewed. Point F. If said candidate is bonded, it thereby is recommended. Point G. If said candidate has a portfolio, it thereby is sponsored. Point H. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby has no visa. Question: Statement: Lotte has a visa. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005914", "pair_id": "u005914-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005914-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "50b289a1f6d29b37", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005914-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Teodor has a commute radius of 59. Olek is not bonded. Lotte has no portfolio. Teodor has a seniority step of 85. Lotte has a commute radius of 2. Olek has a seniority step of 21. Lotte has a seniority step of 63.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a seniority step of maximum 55, it thereby is a veteran. Point B. If said candidate has a diploma, it thereby has a visa. Point C. If said candidate has a commute radius short of 12, it thereby is eligible. Point D. If said candidate is recommended, it thereby has a diploma. Point E. If said candidate is eligible, it thereby is interviewed. Point F. If said candidate is bonded, it thereby is recommended. Point G. If said candidate has a portfolio, it thereby is sponsored. Point H. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby has no visa. Question: Statement: Lotte has a visa. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005914", "pair_id": "u005914-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005914-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "934a74b053460286", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005914-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Teodor has a commute radius of 59. Olek is not bonded. Lotte has no portfolio. Teodor has a seniority step of 85. Lotte has a commute radius of 2. Olek has a seniority step of 21. Lotte has a seniority step of 63.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a seniority step not above 55, so it is a veteran. No. 2 While the given candidate has a diploma, so it has a visa. No. 3 While the given candidate has a commute radius that falls below 1, so it is eligible. No. 4 While the given candidate is recommended, so it has a diploma. No. 5 While the given candidate is eligible, so it is interviewed. No. 6 While the given candidate is bonded, so it is recommended. No. 7 While the given candidate has a portfolio, so it is sponsored. No. 8 While the given candidate is interviewed, so it has no visa. Question: Is the claim \"Lotte has a visa\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005914", "pair_id": "u005914-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005914-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "50b289a1f6d29b37", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005914-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Teodor has a commute radius of 59. Olek is not bonded. Lotte has no portfolio. Teodor has a seniority step of 85. Lotte has a commute radius of 2. Olek has a seniority step of 21. Lotte has a seniority step of 63.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a seniority step not above 55, so it is a veteran. No. 2 While the given candidate has a diploma, so it has a visa. No. 3 While the given candidate has a commute radius that falls below 12, so it is eligible. No. 4 While the given candidate is recommended, so it has a diploma. No. 5 While the given candidate is eligible, so it is interviewed. No. 6 While the given candidate is bonded, so it is recommended. No. 7 While the given candidate has a portfolio, so it is sponsored. No. 8 While the given candidate is interviewed, so it has no visa. Question: Is the claim \"Lotte has a visa\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u005914", "pair_id": "u005914-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005914-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "934a74b053460286", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005920-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has a milestone total of 22. Capella has a review mark of 52. Mirach has a team size of 97. Betelgeuse is not multicenter. Capella is not multicenter. Hadar is multicenter. Betelgeuse has a team size of 29. Hadar has a milestone total of 20. Mirach is not multicenter. Hadar has a review mark of 68.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is not collaborative, it thereby is embargoed. Point B. If said proposal has a field site, it thereby is not collaborative. Point C. If said proposal has a team size short of 68, it thereby is collaborative. Point D. If said proposal has a review mark short of 32, it thereby has a field site. Point E. If said proposal is not multicenter, it thereby has a postdoc. Point F. If said proposal has ethics clearance, it thereby is not shortlisted. Point G. If said proposal is not collaborative, it thereby is not embargoed. Point H. If said proposal has a team size short of 75, it thereby is shortlisted. Point G is cancelled if said proposal has a milestone total in excess of 23. Point G is cancelled if said proposal has a review mark short of 24. Point A is cancelled if said proposal has a review mark of minimum 24. Point G supersedes Point A. Point F supersedes Point H. Point C supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Hadar is embargoed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005920", "pair_id": "u005920-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005920-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b91ceb70fc872f99", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005920-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has a milestone total of 22. Capella has a review mark of 52. Mirach has a team size of 97. Betelgeuse is not multicenter. Capella is not multicenter. Hadar is multicenter. Betelgeuse has a team size of 29. Hadar has a milestone total of 20. Mirach is not multicenter. Hadar has a review mark of 68.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is not collaborative, it thereby is embargoed. Point B. If said proposal has a field site, it thereby is not collaborative. Point C. If said proposal has a team size short of 68, it thereby is collaborative. Point D. If said proposal has a review mark short of 32, it thereby has a field site. Point E. If said proposal is not multicenter, it thereby has a postdoc. Point F. If said proposal has ethics clearance, it thereby is not shortlisted. Point G. If said proposal is not collaborative, it thereby is not embargoed. Point H. If said proposal has a team size short of 75, it thereby is shortlisted. Point G is cancelled if said proposal has a milestone total in excess of 68. Point G is cancelled if said proposal has a review mark short of 24. Point A is cancelled if said proposal has a review mark of minimum 24. Point G supersedes Point A. Point F supersedes Point H. Point C supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Hadar is embargoed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005920", "pair_id": "u005920-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005920-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a6aad15f32f4e08e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u005943-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is not misrouted. Rasmus has a weight class of 19. Odile has a parcel volume of 32. Odile is not misrouted. Thilo has a postal zone of 33. Odile has a postal zone of 6. Thilo has a parcel volume of 99. Rasmus is misrouted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume no lower than 47: then it is undeliverable. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a weight class higher than 74: then it has a courier. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it is weighed. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume no lower than 47: then it is not undeliverable. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is undeliverable: then it is not scanned. Policy I is waived if that parcel has a postal zone no lower than 87. Policy IV is waived if that parcel has a postal zone smaller than 87. Policy III is waived if that parcel has a parcel volume no higher than 49. Policy I is waived if that parcel has a parcel volume no higher than 99. Policy II is waived if that parcel has a parcel volume higher than 62. Question: Is it so that Thilo is undeliverable?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005943", "pair_id": "u005943-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005943-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5f37e626d85ed575", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005943-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is not misrouted. Rasmus has a weight class of 19. Odile has a parcel volume of 32. Odile is not misrouted. Thilo has a postal zone of 33. Odile has a postal zone of 6. Thilo has a parcel volume of 99. Rasmus is misrouted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume no lower than 47: then it is undeliverable. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a weight class higher than 74: then it has a courier. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it is weighed. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume no lower than 47: then it is not undeliverable. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is undeliverable: then it is not scanned. Policy I is waived if that parcel has a postal zone no lower than 87. Policy IV is waived if that parcel has a postal zone smaller than 87. Policy III is waived if that parcel has a parcel volume no higher than 49. Policy I is waived if that parcel has a parcel volume no higher than 73. Policy II is waived if that parcel has a parcel volume higher than 62. Question: Is it so that Thilo is undeliverable?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005943", "pair_id": "u005943-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005943-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "98ab83e2ba6da9c4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005964-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is not sealed. Odile is sealed. Nandor is misrouted. Quentin is perishable. Thilo has a locker slot. Quentin is sealed. Nandor is perishable. Quentin has no locker slot. Quentin is misrouted. Odile is not perishable. Nandor is not delayed. Odile is misrouted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not sealed, it thereby is not rerouted. Point B. If said parcel has a locker slot, it thereby is prepaid. Point C. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby has a barcode. Point D. If said parcel is not misrouted, it thereby is scanned. Point E. If said parcel is not perishable, it thereby is rerouted. Question: Statement: Quentin is not rerouted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005964", "pair_id": "u005964-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005964-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "ed7da2abde692f77", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005964-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is not sealed. Odile is sealed. Nandor is misrouted. Quentin is perishable. Thilo has a locker slot. Quentin is sealed. Nandor is perishable. Quentin has no locker slot. Quentin is not misrouted. Odile is not perishable. Nandor is not delayed. Odile is misrouted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not sealed, it thereby is not rerouted. Point B. If said parcel has a locker slot, it thereby is prepaid. Point C. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby has a barcode. Point D. If said parcel is not misrouted, it thereby is scanned. Point E. If said parcel is not perishable, it thereby is rerouted. Question: Statement: Quentin is not rerouted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005964", "pair_id": "u005964-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005964-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "ecf819dfc9194ae0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005964-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is not sealed. Odile is sealed. Nandor is misrouted. Quentin is perishable. Thilo has a locker slot. Quentin is sealed. Nandor is perishable. Quentin has no locker slot. Quentin is misrouted. Odile is not perishable. Nandor is not delayed. Odile is misrouted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is not sealed, so it is not rerouted. No. 2 While the given parcel has a locker slot, so it is prepaid. No. 3 While the given parcel is delayed, so it has a barcode. No. 4 While the given parcel is not misrouted, so it is scanned. No. 5 While the given parcel is not perishable, so it is rerouted. Question: Is the claim \"Quentin is not rerouted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005964", "pair_id": "u005964-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005964-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "ed7da2abde692f77", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005964-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is not sealed. Odile is sealed. Nandor is misrouted. Quentin is perishable. Thilo has a locker slot. Quentin is sealed. Nandor is perishable. Quentin has no locker slot. Quentin is not misrouted. Odile is not perishable. Nandor is not delayed. Odile is misrouted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is not sealed, so it is not rerouted. No. 2 While the given parcel has a locker slot, so it is prepaid. No. 3 While the given parcel is delayed, so it has a barcode. No. 4 While the given parcel is not misrouted, so it is scanned. No. 5 While the given parcel is not perishable, so it is rerouted. Question: Is the claim \"Quentin is not rerouted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005964", "pair_id": "u005964-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u005964-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "ecf819dfc9194ae0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u005985-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma is not endorsed. Betelgeuse is not endorsed. Betelgeuse is not peer reviewed. Gemma is peer reviewed. Electra has no industry backing. Gemma has a field site. Electra is exploratory. Electra is endorsed. Betelgeuse has no field site. Aldebaran is not exploratory. Aldebaran is not endorsed. Betelgeuse is exploratory. Aldebaran is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has a field site: then it is theoretical. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is exploratory: then it is not theoretical. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has industry backing: then it is shortlisted. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has industry backing: then it is not shortlisted. Policy III is waived if that proposal has a field site. Policy IV is waived if that proposal is endorsed. Policy II is waived if that proposal is peer reviewed. Policy III is waived if that proposal is peer reviewed. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy IV. Question: Is it so that Electra is shortlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u005985", "pair_id": "u005985-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005985-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "84c893a0535a0d9e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u005985-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma is not endorsed. Betelgeuse is not endorsed. Betelgeuse is not peer reviewed. Gemma is peer reviewed. Electra has industry backing. Gemma has a field site. Electra is exploratory. Electra is endorsed. Betelgeuse has no field site. Aldebaran is not exploratory. Aldebaran is not endorsed. Betelgeuse is exploratory. Aldebaran is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has a field site: then it is theoretical. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is exploratory: then it is not theoretical. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has industry backing: then it is shortlisted. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has industry backing: then it is not shortlisted. Policy III is waived if that proposal has a field site. Policy IV is waived if that proposal is endorsed. Policy II is waived if that proposal is peer reviewed. Policy III is waived if that proposal is peer reviewed. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy IV. Question: Is it so that Electra is shortlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u005985", "pair_id": "u005985-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u005985-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bd28bc6ae8065a89", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u006006-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not linted. Galena is merged. Zircon is experimental. Zircon has no feature toggle. Galena is not versioned. Zircon is signed.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is signed and is linted and is merged, then it is benchmarked. (2) If a build is signed and is experimental, then it is not benchmarked. (3) If a build is versioned and has a feature toggle and is merged, then it is tested. (4) If a build is versioned, then it is not profiled. Question: Is it true that Zircon is not benchmarked?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006006", "pair_id": "u006006-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006006-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "a344e8f4a33036bc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006006-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not linted. Galena is merged. Zircon is experimental. Zircon is versioned. Zircon has no feature toggle. Galena is not versioned. Zircon is signed.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is signed and is linted and is merged, then it is benchmarked. (2) If a build is signed and is experimental, then it is not benchmarked. (3) If a build is versioned and has a feature toggle and is merged, then it is tested. (4) If a build is versioned, then it is not profiled. Question: Is it true that Zircon is not benchmarked?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006006", "pair_id": "u006006-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006006-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "0b31494bce3d1c19", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006042-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira has ethics clearance. Betelgeuse is cofunded. Kochab is not cofunded. Fomalhaut is preregistered. Fomalhaut is not cofunded. Fomalhaut has no ethics clearance. Kochab is preregistered. Kochab has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is not collaborative, then it is a pilot study. (2) If a proposal is not collaborative, then it is interdisciplinary. (3) If a proposal has no ethics clearance, then it has a patent filing. (4) If a proposal is a pilot study, then it is not translational. (5) If a proposal is not renewed, then it is translational. (6) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is not collaborative. (7) If a proposal is preregistered, then it has a steering committee. (8) If a proposal has a patent filing, then it is not renewed. Question: Is it true that Fomalhaut is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006042", "pair_id": "u006042-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006042-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "d8f8a33e13f42ccc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006042-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira has ethics clearance. Betelgeuse is cofunded. Kochab is not cofunded. Fomalhaut is preregistered. Fomalhaut is not cofunded. Fomalhaut has no ethics clearance. Kochab is preregistered. Kochab has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is not collaborative, then it is a pilot study. (2) If a proposal is not collaborative, then it is interdisciplinary. (3) If a proposal has ethics clearance, then it has a patent filing. (4) If a proposal is a pilot study, then it is not translational. (5) If a proposal is not renewed, then it is translational. (6) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is not collaborative. (7) If a proposal is preregistered, then it has a steering committee. (8) If a proposal has a patent filing, then it is not renewed. Question: Is it true that Fomalhaut is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006042", "pair_id": "u006042-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006042-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "6f47c4f0256d1318", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006042-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira has ethics clearance. Betelgeuse is cofunded. Kochab is not cofunded. Fomalhaut is preregistered. Fomalhaut is not cofunded. Fomalhaut has no ethics clearance. Kochab is preregistered. Kochab has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is not collaborative, that proposal is a pilot study. Item B. When the proposal is not collaborative, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item C. When the proposal has no ethics clearance, that proposal has a patent filing. Item D. When the proposal is a pilot study, that proposal is not translational. Item E. When the proposal is not renewed, that proposal is translational. Item F. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is not collaborative. Item G. When the proposal is preregistered, that proposal has a steering committee. Item H. When the proposal has a patent filing, that proposal is not renewed. Question: Can one infer that Fomalhaut is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006042", "pair_id": "u006042-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006042-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "d8f8a33e13f42ccc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006042-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira has ethics clearance. Betelgeuse is cofunded. Kochab is not cofunded. Fomalhaut is preregistered. Fomalhaut is not cofunded. Fomalhaut has no ethics clearance. Kochab is preregistered. Kochab has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is not collaborative, that proposal is a pilot study. Item B. When the proposal is not collaborative, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item C. When the proposal has ethics clearance, that proposal has a patent filing. Item D. When the proposal is a pilot study, that proposal is not translational. Item E. When the proposal is not renewed, that proposal is translational. Item F. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is not collaborative. Item G. When the proposal is preregistered, that proposal has a steering committee. Item H. When the proposal has a patent filing, that proposal is not renewed. Question: Can one infer that Fomalhaut is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006042", "pair_id": "u006042-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006042-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "6f47c4f0256d1318", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006068-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta has no collateral. Tomas is bankrupt. Tomas has an escrow account. Hamid has no collateral. Hamid has an escrow account.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is not a depositor provided that it has a cosigner. Section 2: a borrower is not garnished provided that it has a mortgage. Section 3: a borrower is garnished provided that it is not a depositor. Section 4: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it has no collateral. Section 5: a borrower is solvent provided that it has an escrow account. Section 6: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it is bankrupt. Section 7: a borrower has a mortgage provided that it is a homeowner. Question: Hamid is garnished. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006068", "pair_id": "u006068-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006068-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "9077e8d0cd192d89", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u006068-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta has no collateral. Tomas is bankrupt. Tomas has an escrow account. Hamid has no collateral. Hamid has an escrow account.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is not a depositor provided that it has a cosigner. Section 2: a borrower is not garnished provided that it has a mortgage. Section 3: a borrower is garnished provided that it is not a depositor. Section 4: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it has collateral. Section 5: a borrower is solvent provided that it has an escrow account. Section 6: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it is bankrupt. Section 7: a borrower has a mortgage provided that it is a homeowner. Question: Hamid is garnished. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006068", "pair_id": "u006068-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006068-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "3968e0e0fb5224f5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u006068-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta has no collateral. Tomas is bankrupt. Tomas has an escrow account. Hamid has no collateral. Hamid has an escrow account.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has a cosigner: then it is not a depositor. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has a mortgage: then it is not garnished. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is not a depositor: then it is garnished. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has no collateral: then it has a cosigner. Policy V. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is solvent. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt: then it is a homeowner. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner: then it has a mortgage. Question: Is it so that Hamid is garnished?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006068", "pair_id": "u006068-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006068-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "9077e8d0cd192d89", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u006068-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta has no collateral. Tomas is bankrupt. Tomas has an escrow account. Hamid has no collateral. Hamid has an escrow account.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has a cosigner: then it is not a depositor. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has a mortgage: then it is not garnished. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is not a depositor: then it is garnished. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it has a cosigner. Policy V. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is solvent. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt: then it is a homeowner. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner: then it has a mortgage. Question: Is it so that Hamid is garnished?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006068", "pair_id": "u006068-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006068-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "3968e0e0fb5224f5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u006068-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta has no collateral. Tomas is bankrupt. Tomas has an escrow account. Hamid has no collateral. Hamid has an escrow account.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has a cosigner, it then is not a depositor. #2 Each time a borrower has a mortgage, it then is not garnished. #3 Each time a borrower is not a depositor, it then is garnished. #4 Each time a borrower has no collateral, it then has a cosigner. #5 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then is solvent. #6 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then is a homeowner. #7 Each time a borrower is a homeowner, it then has a mortgage. Question: Do the terms above show that Hamid is garnished?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006068", "pair_id": "u006068-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006068-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "9077e8d0cd192d89", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u006068-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta has no collateral. Tomas is bankrupt. Tomas has an escrow account. Hamid has no collateral. Hamid has an escrow account.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has a cosigner, it then is not a depositor. #2 Each time a borrower has a mortgage, it then is not garnished. #3 Each time a borrower is not a depositor, it then is garnished. #4 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then has a cosigner. #5 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then is solvent. #6 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then is a homeowner. #7 Each time a borrower is a homeowner, it then has a mortgage. Question: Do the terms above show that Hamid is garnished?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006068", "pair_id": "u006068-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006068-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "3968e0e0fb5224f5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u006069-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is admitted. Wendel is admitted. Xenia is bedridden. Dorian is not bedridden. Wendel is not bedridden. Dorian is not sedated. Xenia is not diabetic. Aurel is not bedridden. Dorian is not diabetic. Wendel is sedated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is ambulatory, thus it is not allergic. Provision 2: when the patient here is diabetic, thus it is not hypertensive. Provision 3: when the patient here is bedridden, thus it has an interpreter. Provision 4: when the patient here is bedridden, thus it is allergic. Provision 5: when the patient here is sedated, thus it is ambulatory. Provision 6: when the patient here has a caregiver, thus it is not postoperative. Provision 7: when the patient here is admitted, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 8: when the patient here has a caregiver, thus it is postoperative. Provision 9: when the patient here is ambulatory, thus it has a caregiver. Provision 10: when the patient here has a caregiver, thus it has no interpreter. Provision 11: when the patient here is bedridden, thus it is not ambulatory. Provision 8 has no effect when the patient here is bedridden. Provision 6 has no effect when the patient here is diabetic. Provision 10 has no effect when the patient here is bedridden. Provision 8 has no effect when the patient here is diabetic. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here is bedridden. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 11. Question: Would it be right to say that Xenia is not postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006069", "pair_id": "u006069-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006069-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0096cc9b66d6fcc3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006069-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is admitted. Wendel is admitted. Xenia is bedridden. Dorian is not bedridden. Xenia is sedated. Wendel is not bedridden. Dorian is not sedated. Xenia is not diabetic. Aurel is not bedridden. Dorian is not diabetic. Wendel is sedated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is ambulatory, thus it is not allergic. Provision 2: when the patient here is diabetic, thus it is not hypertensive. Provision 3: when the patient here is bedridden, thus it has an interpreter. Provision 4: when the patient here is bedridden, thus it is allergic. Provision 5: when the patient here is sedated, thus it is ambulatory. Provision 6: when the patient here has a caregiver, thus it is not postoperative. Provision 7: when the patient here is admitted, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 8: when the patient here has a caregiver, thus it is postoperative. Provision 9: when the patient here is ambulatory, thus it has a caregiver. Provision 10: when the patient here has a caregiver, thus it has no interpreter. Provision 11: when the patient here is bedridden, thus it is not ambulatory. Provision 8 has no effect when the patient here is bedridden. Provision 6 has no effect when the patient here is diabetic. Provision 10 has no effect when the patient here is bedridden. Provision 8 has no effect when the patient here is diabetic. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here is bedridden. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 11. Question: Would it be right to say that Xenia is not postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006069", "pair_id": "u006069-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006069-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1b6f922204cd4ae6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006069-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is admitted. Wendel is admitted. Xenia is bedridden. Dorian is not bedridden. Wendel is not bedridden. Dorian is not sedated. Xenia is not diabetic. Aurel is not bedridden. Dorian is not diabetic. Wendel is sedated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is ambulatory, it thereby is not allergic. Point B. If said patient is diabetic, it thereby is not hypertensive. Point C. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby has an interpreter. Point D. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is allergic. Point E. If said patient is sedated, it thereby is ambulatory. Point F. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby is not postoperative. Point G. If said patient is admitted, it thereby is hypertensive. Point H. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby is postoperative. Point I. If said patient is ambulatory, it thereby has a caregiver. Point J. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby has no interpreter. Point K. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is not ambulatory. Point H is cancelled if said patient is bedridden. Point F is cancelled if said patient is diabetic. Point J is cancelled if said patient is bedridden. Point H is cancelled if said patient is diabetic. Point A is cancelled if said patient is bedridden. Point D supersedes Point A. Point G supersedes Point B. Point J supersedes Point C. Point H supersedes Point F. Point E supersedes Point K. Question: Statement: Xenia is not postoperative. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006069", "pair_id": "u006069-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006069-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0096cc9b66d6fcc3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006069-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is admitted. Wendel is admitted. Xenia is bedridden. Dorian is not bedridden. Xenia is sedated. Wendel is not bedridden. Dorian is not sedated. Xenia is not diabetic. Aurel is not bedridden. Dorian is not diabetic. Wendel is sedated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is ambulatory, it thereby is not allergic. Point B. If said patient is diabetic, it thereby is not hypertensive. Point C. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby has an interpreter. Point D. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is allergic. Point E. If said patient is sedated, it thereby is ambulatory. Point F. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby is not postoperative. Point G. If said patient is admitted, it thereby is hypertensive. Point H. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby is postoperative. Point I. If said patient is ambulatory, it thereby has a caregiver. Point J. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby has no interpreter. Point K. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is not ambulatory. Point H is cancelled if said patient is bedridden. Point F is cancelled if said patient is diabetic. Point J is cancelled if said patient is bedridden. Point H is cancelled if said patient is diabetic. Point A is cancelled if said patient is bedridden. Point D supersedes Point A. Point G supersedes Point B. Point J supersedes Point C. Point H supersedes Point F. Point E supersedes Point K. Question: Statement: Xenia is not postoperative. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006069", "pair_id": "u006069-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006069-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1b6f922204cd4ae6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006088-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is not embargoed. Betelgeuse has a team size of 63. Aldebaran is peer reviewed. Deneb is not exploratory. Hadar is not multicenter. Betelgeuse is peer reviewed. Aldebaran has no industry backing. Aldebaran is not embargoed. Deneb has no industry backing. Betelgeuse is not exploratory. Betelgeuse is embargoed. Betelgeuse has industry backing. Betelgeuse is not a pilot study. Hadar is not exploratory. Aldebaran has a review mark of 56. Betelgeuse is longitudinal. Deneb is peer reviewed. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Aldebaran has a team size of 15. Betelgeuse has ethics clearance. Betelgeuse has a review mark of 72. Hadar has a team size of 76. Deneb is not a pilot study. Deneb is not embargoed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is longitudinal, that proposal is not interdisciplinary. Item B. When the proposal has a team size of more than 38, and is exploratory, that proposal has a field site. Item C. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal is collaborative. Item D. When the proposal has a team size of more than 38, and has a review mark of no more than 84, and has industry backing, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item E. When the proposal is embargoed, that proposal is not translational. Item F. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal is not collaborative. Item G. When the proposal has a team size of more than 38, and is longitudinal, that proposal is renewed. Item H. When the proposal is exploratory, that proposal is not interdisciplinary. Item I. When the proposal has a team size of more than 38, and is peer reviewed, and is a pilot study, that proposal is translational. Item F is suspended when the proposal has ethics clearance. Item B is suspended when the proposal is peer reviewed. Item F outranks Item C. Item H outranks Item D. Item A outranks Item D. Item I outranks Item E. Question: What applies to Betelgeuse?", "options": ["is interdisciplinary", "is translational", "is renewed", "has a field site"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is renewed", "unit_id": "u006088", "pair_id": "u006088-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006088-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a2487bc02c4accfa", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a4", "a2", "a12", "a3"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u006088-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is not embargoed. Betelgeuse has a team size of 63. Aldebaran is peer reviewed. Deneb is not exploratory. Hadar is not multicenter. Betelgeuse is peer reviewed. Aldebaran has no industry backing. Aldebaran is not embargoed. Deneb has no industry backing. Betelgeuse is not exploratory. Betelgeuse is embargoed. Betelgeuse has industry backing. Betelgeuse is not a pilot study. Hadar is not exploratory. Aldebaran has a review mark of 56. Betelgeuse is not longitudinal. Deneb is peer reviewed. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Aldebaran has a team size of 15. Betelgeuse has ethics clearance. Betelgeuse has a review mark of 72. Hadar has a team size of 76. Deneb is not a pilot study. Deneb is not embargoed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is longitudinal, that proposal is not interdisciplinary. Item B. When the proposal has a team size of more than 38, and is exploratory, that proposal has a field site. Item C. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal is collaborative. Item D. When the proposal has a team size of more than 38, and has a review mark of no more than 84, and has industry backing, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item E. When the proposal is embargoed, that proposal is not translational. Item F. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal is not collaborative. Item G. When the proposal has a team size of more than 38, and is longitudinal, that proposal is renewed. Item H. When the proposal is exploratory, that proposal is not interdisciplinary. Item I. When the proposal has a team size of more than 38, and is peer reviewed, and is a pilot study, that proposal is translational. Item F is suspended when the proposal has ethics clearance. Item B is suspended when the proposal is peer reviewed. Item F outranks Item C. Item H outranks Item D. Item A outranks Item D. Item I outranks Item E. Question: What applies to Betelgeuse?", "options": ["is interdisciplinary", "is translational", "is renewed", "has a field site"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is interdisciplinary", "unit_id": "u006088", "pair_id": "u006088-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006088-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea6f03f26f781676", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a4", "a2", "a12", "a3"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u006108-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gunnar is not diabetic. Elif is not discharged. Wendel is admitted. Gunnar is pregnant. Elif is not waitlisted. Gunnar has no caregiver. Gunnar is referred. Dorian is not triaged. Elif is pregnant. Dorian is not contagious. Wendel is not pregnant. Wendel is rescheduled. Gunnar is contagious. Dorian is diabetic. Dorian is discharged. Elif is not diabetic. Elif has no caregiver. Gunnar is not admitted. Elif is contagious. Wendel is referred. Elif is triaged. Gunnar is symptomatic. Elif is not referred. Dorian is waitlisted. Dorian is rescheduled. Dorian is symptomatic. Dorian is referred. Elif is not symptomatic. Elif is not anemic. Gunnar is not discharged. Wendel is not anemic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is not referred and further is not waitlisted, it thereby is not sedated. Point B. If said patient is not sedated and further is discharged and further is triaged, it thereby is hypertensive. Point C. If said patient is not sedated and further is not diabetic, it thereby is asthmatic. Point D. If said patient is not sedated and further is symptomatic and further is discharged, it thereby is fasting. Point E. If said patient is not sedated and further is not admitted and further is allergic, it thereby is ambulatory. Point F. If said patient has no interpreter, it thereby is vaccinated. Point G. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby has a pacemaker. Point H. If said patient is not sedated and further is diabetic, it thereby has an interpreter. Point I. If said patient is anemic and further has a caregiver, it thereby is allergic. Point J. If said patient is not sedated and further is not symptomatic and further is rescheduled, it thereby has a chaperone. Point K. If said patient is not sedated and further is admitted and further is contagious, it thereby is bedridden. Question: Which choice is true for Elif?", "options": ["has an interpreter", "is hypertensive", "is fasting", "is ambulatory", "is asthmatic", "has a chaperone", "is bedridden"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is asthmatic", "unit_id": "u006108", "pair_id": "u006108-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006108-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "1b63b15b93f5eeac", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a5", "a10", "a13", "a9", "a6", "a22"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006108-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gunnar is not diabetic. Elif is not discharged. Wendel is admitted. Gunnar is pregnant. Elif is not waitlisted. Gunnar has no caregiver. Gunnar is referred. Dorian is not triaged. Elif is pregnant. Dorian is not contagious. Wendel is not pregnant. Wendel is rescheduled. Gunnar is contagious. Dorian is diabetic. Dorian is discharged. Elif is diabetic. Elif has no caregiver. Gunnar is not admitted. Elif is contagious. Wendel is referred. Elif is triaged. Gunnar is symptomatic. Elif is not referred. Dorian is waitlisted. Dorian is rescheduled. Dorian is symptomatic. Dorian is referred. Elif is not symptomatic. Elif is not anemic. Gunnar is not discharged. Wendel is not anemic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is not referred and further is not waitlisted, it thereby is not sedated. Point B. If said patient is not sedated and further is discharged and further is triaged, it thereby is hypertensive. Point C. If said patient is not sedated and further is not diabetic, it thereby is asthmatic. Point D. If said patient is not sedated and further is symptomatic and further is discharged, it thereby is fasting. Point E. If said patient is not sedated and further is not admitted and further is allergic, it thereby is ambulatory. Point F. If said patient has no interpreter, it thereby is vaccinated. Point G. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby has a pacemaker. Point H. If said patient is not sedated and further is diabetic, it thereby has an interpreter. Point I. If said patient is anemic and further has a caregiver, it thereby is allergic. Point J. If said patient is not sedated and further is not symptomatic and further is rescheduled, it thereby has a chaperone. Point K. If said patient is not sedated and further is admitted and further is contagious, it thereby is bedridden. Question: Which choice is true for Elif?", "options": ["has an interpreter", "is hypertensive", "is fasting", "is ambulatory", "is asthmatic", "has a chaperone", "is bedridden"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has an interpreter", "unit_id": "u006108", "pair_id": "u006108-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006108-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "541efbd21b33b38c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a5", "a10", "a13", "a9", "a6", "a22"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006133-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is tested. Zircon is not versioned. Basalt is versioned. Zircon is tested. Basalt has a test yield of 11.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is tested, it also is not tagged. Clause 2: once any build is tested, it also is profiled. Clause 3: once any build has a test yield of 66 or more, it also is minified. Clause 4: once any build is versioned, it also is not minified. Clause 5: once any build is not versioned, it also is merged. Clause 6: once any build is versioned, it also is tagged. Clause 7: once any build is versioned, it also is not profiled. Clause 7 overrides Clause 2. Clause 6 overrides Clause 1. Clause 3 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Basalt is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006133", "pair_id": "u006133-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006133-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6c588f66d115eed5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006133-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is tested. Zircon is not versioned. Basalt is versioned. Zircon is tested. Basalt has a test yield of 11.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is tested, it also is not tagged. Clause 2: once any build is tested, it also is profiled. Clause 3: once any build has a test yield of 66 or more, it also is minified. Clause 4: once any build is versioned, it also is not minified. Clause 5: once any build is versioned, it also is merged. Clause 6: once any build is versioned, it also is tagged. Clause 7: once any build is versioned, it also is not profiled. Clause 7 overrides Clause 2. Clause 6 overrides Clause 1. Clause 3 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Basalt is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006133", "pair_id": "u006133-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006133-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ef79622644fb505e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006133-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is tested. Zircon is not versioned. Basalt is versioned. Zircon is tested. Basalt has a test yield of 11.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is tested, that build is not tagged. Item B. When the build is tested, that build is profiled. Item C. When the build has a test yield of no less than 66, that build is minified. Item D. When the build is versioned, that build is not minified. Item E. When the build is not versioned, that build is merged. Item F. When the build is versioned, that build is tagged. Item G. When the build is versioned, that build is not profiled. Item G outranks Item B. Item F outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Basalt is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006133", "pair_id": "u006133-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006133-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6c588f66d115eed5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006133-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is tested. Zircon is not versioned. Basalt is versioned. Zircon is tested. Basalt has a test yield of 11.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is tested, that build is not tagged. Item B. When the build is tested, that build is profiled. Item C. When the build has a test yield of no less than 66, that build is minified. Item D. When the build is versioned, that build is not minified. Item E. When the build is versioned, that build is merged. Item F. When the build is versioned, that build is tagged. Item G. When the build is versioned, that build is not profiled. Item G outranks Item B. Item F outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Basalt is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006133", "pair_id": "u006133-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006133-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ef79622644fb505e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006160-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice has no migration script. Talc is localized. Quartz has a patch cycle of 67. Talc has a migration script. Quartz has a lint backlog of 87.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is not reproducible provided that it has a lint backlog exceeding 61. Section 2: a build is tested provided that it has a patch cycle lower than 48. Section 3: a build is benchmarked provided that it is reverted. Section 4: a build is linted provided that it is versioned. Section 5: a build is reverted provided that it is not localized. Section 6: a build is obsolete provided that it is compiled. Section 7: a build is profiled provided that it is linted. Section 8: a build is documented provided that it is flaky. Section 9: a build is flaky provided that it is not versioned. Section 10: a build has a security advisory provided that it has a migration script. Section 11: a build has a feature toggle provided that it has a patch cycle of 48 or higher. Section 12: a build is fuzzed provided that it has a feature toggle. Section 13: a build is compiled provided that it is localized. Section 14: a build is reproducible provided that it is tested. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 14. Question: Which statement fits Talc?", "options": ["is benchmarked", "is profiled", "is reproducible", "is fuzzed", "is obsolete", "is documented"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is obsolete", "unit_id": "u006160", "pair_id": "u006160-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006160-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "52101d3e70fe2ab4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a10", "a16", "a8", "a14", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006160-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice has no migration script. Talc is not localized. Quartz has a patch cycle of 67. Talc has a migration script. Quartz has a lint backlog of 87.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is not reproducible provided that it has a lint backlog exceeding 61. Section 2: a build is tested provided that it has a patch cycle lower than 48. Section 3: a build is benchmarked provided that it is reverted. Section 4: a build is linted provided that it is versioned. Section 5: a build is reverted provided that it is not localized. Section 6: a build is obsolete provided that it is compiled. Section 7: a build is profiled provided that it is linted. Section 8: a build is documented provided that it is flaky. Section 9: a build is flaky provided that it is not versioned. Section 10: a build has a security advisory provided that it has a migration script. Section 11: a build has a feature toggle provided that it has a patch cycle of 48 or higher. Section 12: a build is fuzzed provided that it has a feature toggle. Section 13: a build is compiled provided that it is localized. Section 14: a build is reproducible provided that it is tested. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 14. Question: Which statement fits Talc?", "options": ["is benchmarked", "is profiled", "is reproducible", "is fuzzed", "is obsolete", "is documented"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is benchmarked", "unit_id": "u006160", "pair_id": "u006160-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006160-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5c769fe2f0b720b6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a10", "a16", "a8", "a14", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006160-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice has no migration script. Talc is localized. Quartz has a patch cycle of 67. Talc has a migration script. Quartz has a lint backlog of 87.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a lint backlog higher than 61: then it is not reproducible. Policy II. Suppose that build has a patch cycle smaller than 48: then it is tested. Policy III. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is benchmarked. Policy IV. Suppose that build is versioned: then it is linted. Policy V. Suppose that build is not localized: then it is reverted. Policy VI. Suppose that build is compiled: then it is obsolete. Policy VII. Suppose that build is linted: then it is profiled. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is flaky: then it is documented. Policy IX. Suppose that build is not versioned: then it is flaky. Policy X. Suppose that build has a migration script: then it has a security advisory. Policy XI. Suppose that build has a patch cycle no lower than 48: then it has a feature toggle. Policy XII. Suppose that build has a feature toggle: then it is fuzzed. Policy XIII. Suppose that build is localized: then it is compiled. Policy XIV. Suppose that build is tested: then it is reproducible. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy XIV. Question: Which choice is right for Talc?", "options": ["is benchmarked", "is profiled", "is reproducible", "is fuzzed", "is obsolete", "is documented"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is obsolete", "unit_id": "u006160", "pair_id": "u006160-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006160-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "52101d3e70fe2ab4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a10", "a16", "a8", "a14", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006160-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice has no migration script. Talc is not localized. Quartz has a patch cycle of 67. Talc has a migration script. Quartz has a lint backlog of 87.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a lint backlog higher than 61: then it is not reproducible. Policy II. Suppose that build has a patch cycle smaller than 48: then it is tested. Policy III. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is benchmarked. Policy IV. Suppose that build is versioned: then it is linted. Policy V. Suppose that build is not localized: then it is reverted. Policy VI. Suppose that build is compiled: then it is obsolete. Policy VII. Suppose that build is linted: then it is profiled. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is flaky: then it is documented. Policy IX. Suppose that build is not versioned: then it is flaky. Policy X. Suppose that build has a migration script: then it has a security advisory. Policy XI. Suppose that build has a patch cycle no lower than 48: then it has a feature toggle. Policy XII. Suppose that build has a feature toggle: then it is fuzzed. Policy XIII. Suppose that build is localized: then it is compiled. Policy XIV. Suppose that build is tested: then it is reproducible. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy XIV. Question: Which choice is right for Talc?", "options": ["is benchmarked", "is profiled", "is reproducible", "is fuzzed", "is obsolete", "is documented"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is benchmarked", "unit_id": "u006160", "pair_id": "u006160-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006160-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5c769fe2f0b720b6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a10", "a16", "a8", "a14", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006160-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice has no migration script. Talc is localized. Quartz has a patch cycle of 67. Talc has a migration script. Quartz has a lint backlog of 87.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a lint backlog greater than 61, it then is not reproducible. #2 Each time a build has a patch cycle less than 48, it then is tested. #3 Each time a build is reverted, it then is benchmarked. #4 Each time a build is versioned, it then is linted. #5 Each time a build is not localized, it then is reverted. #6 Each time a build is compiled, it then is obsolete. #7 Each time a build is linted, it then is profiled. #8 Each time a build is flaky, it then is documented. #9 Each time a build is not versioned, it then is flaky. #10 Each time a build has a migration script, it then has a security advisory. #11 Each time a build has a patch cycle of 48 or above, it then has a feature toggle. #12 Each time a build has a feature toggle, it then is fuzzed. #13 Each time a build is localized, it then is compiled. #14 Each time a build is tested, it then is reproducible. #14 yields to #1. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Talc?", "options": ["is benchmarked", "is profiled", "is reproducible", "is fuzzed", "is obsolete", "is documented"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is obsolete", "unit_id": "u006160", "pair_id": "u006160-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006160-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "52101d3e70fe2ab4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a10", "a16", "a8", "a14", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006160-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice has no migration script. Talc is not localized. Quartz has a patch cycle of 67. Talc has a migration script. Quartz has a lint backlog of 87.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a lint backlog greater than 61, it then is not reproducible. #2 Each time a build has a patch cycle less than 48, it then is tested. #3 Each time a build is reverted, it then is benchmarked. #4 Each time a build is versioned, it then is linted. #5 Each time a build is not localized, it then is reverted. #6 Each time a build is compiled, it then is obsolete. #7 Each time a build is linted, it then is profiled. #8 Each time a build is flaky, it then is documented. #9 Each time a build is not versioned, it then is flaky. #10 Each time a build has a migration script, it then has a security advisory. #11 Each time a build has a patch cycle of 48 or above, it then has a feature toggle. #12 Each time a build has a feature toggle, it then is fuzzed. #13 Each time a build is localized, it then is compiled. #14 Each time a build is tested, it then is reproducible. #14 yields to #1. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Talc?", "options": ["is benchmarked", "is profiled", "is reproducible", "is fuzzed", "is obsolete", "is documented"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is benchmarked", "unit_id": "u006160", "pair_id": "u006160-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006160-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5c769fe2f0b720b6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a10", "a16", "a8", "a14", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006165-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke has a guarantor. Tomas has collateral. Bastien has no collateral. Folke is a homeowner. Tomas is pensioned. Bastien has no escrow account. Bastien is delinquent. Tomas has no guarantor. Folke has an escrow account. Folke is creditworthy. Ilse is pensioned. Bastien has no guarantor. Folke has no collateral. Ilse has no cosigner. Tomas has no escrow account. Ilse is not a homeowner. Folke is pensioned. Bastien is not creditworthy. Folke is not delinquent.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is solvent provided that it is a homeowner as well as is creditworthy. Section 2: a borrower is a depositor provided that it is a homeowner. Section 3: a borrower is not solvent provided that it has an escrow account. Section 4: a borrower is not refinanced provided that it has an escrow account as well as has no collateral as well as is creditworthy. Section 5: a borrower is refinanced provided that it has an escrow account as well as is pensioned as well as is creditworthy. Section 6: a borrower is not a depositor provided that it has an escrow account as well as has a cosigner. Section 7: a borrower is not indebted provided that it is delinquent as well as has a guarantor. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 6. Question: Folke is not refinanced. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006165", "pair_id": "u006165-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006165-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6b74af9ac6572703", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u006165-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke has a guarantor. Tomas has collateral. Bastien has no collateral. Folke is a homeowner. Tomas is pensioned. Bastien has no escrow account. Bastien is delinquent. Tomas has no guarantor. Folke has an escrow account. Folke is creditworthy. Ilse is pensioned. Bastien has no guarantor. Folke has no collateral. Ilse has no cosigner. Tomas has no escrow account. Ilse is not a homeowner. Folke is pensioned. Bastien is not creditworthy. Folke is not delinquent.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is solvent provided that it is a homeowner as well as is creditworthy. Section 2: a borrower is a depositor provided that it is a homeowner. Section 3: a borrower is not solvent provided that it has an escrow account. Section 4: a borrower is not refinanced provided that it has an escrow account as well as has collateral as well as is creditworthy. Section 5: a borrower is refinanced provided that it has an escrow account as well as is pensioned as well as is creditworthy. Section 6: a borrower is not a depositor provided that it has an escrow account as well as has a cosigner. Section 7: a borrower is not indebted provided that it is delinquent as well as has a guarantor. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 6. Question: Folke is not refinanced. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006165", "pair_id": "u006165-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006165-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cd7d07868961f58b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u006165-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke has a guarantor. Tomas has collateral. Bastien has no collateral. Folke is a homeowner. Tomas is pensioned. Bastien has no escrow account. Bastien is delinquent. Tomas has no guarantor. Folke has an escrow account. Folke is creditworthy. Ilse is pensioned. Bastien has no guarantor. Folke has no collateral. Ilse has no cosigner. Tomas has no escrow account. Ilse is not a homeowner. Folke is pensioned. Bastien is not creditworthy. Folke is not delinquent.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner plus is creditworthy: then it is solvent. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner: then it is a depositor. Policy III. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is not solvent. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account plus has no collateral plus is creditworthy: then it is not refinanced. Policy V. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account plus is pensioned plus is creditworthy: then it is refinanced. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account plus has a cosigner: then it is not a depositor. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is delinquent plus has a guarantor: then it is not indebted. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VI. Question: Is it so that Folke is not refinanced?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006165", "pair_id": "u006165-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006165-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6b74af9ac6572703", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u006165-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke has a guarantor. Tomas has collateral. Bastien has no collateral. Folke is a homeowner. Tomas is pensioned. Bastien has no escrow account. Bastien is delinquent. Tomas has no guarantor. Folke has an escrow account. Folke is creditworthy. Ilse is pensioned. Bastien has no guarantor. Folke has no collateral. Ilse has no cosigner. Tomas has no escrow account. Ilse is not a homeowner. Folke is pensioned. Bastien is not creditworthy. Folke is not delinquent.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner plus is creditworthy: then it is solvent. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner: then it is a depositor. Policy III. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is not solvent. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account plus has collateral plus is creditworthy: then it is not refinanced. Policy V. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account plus is pensioned plus is creditworthy: then it is refinanced. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account plus has a cosigner: then it is not a depositor. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is delinquent plus has a guarantor: then it is not indebted. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VI. Question: Is it so that Folke is not refinanced?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006165", "pair_id": "u006165-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006165-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cd7d07868961f58b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u006167-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse has a steering committee. Betelgeuse has a milestone total of 77. Betelgeuse is not renewed. Kochab is not resubmitted. Kochab is renewed. Betelgeuse has no postdoc. Betelgeuse has no seed funding. Betelgeuse is not resubmitted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is renewed and also has a steering committee and also has a postdoc, it also is interdisciplinary. Clause 2: once any proposal is endorsed and also has a milestone total of 78 or more and also is not resubmitted, it also is a pilot study. Clause 3: once any proposal has a milestone total over 37, it also is budgeted. Clause 4: once any proposal has a steering committee and also is renewed and also has seed funding, it also is shortlisted. Clause 5: once any proposal is endorsed and also has a milestone total under 78 and also is not resubmitted, it also is not a pilot study. Question: Does it follow that Betelgeuse is a pilot study?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006167", "pair_id": "u006167-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006167-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d954eefe11447de8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006167-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse has a steering committee. Betelgeuse has a milestone total of 77. Betelgeuse is not renewed. Kochab is not resubmitted. Kochab is renewed. Betelgeuse has no postdoc. Betelgeuse has no seed funding. Betelgeuse is not resubmitted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is renewed and also has a steering committee and also has a postdoc, it also is interdisciplinary. Clause 2: once any proposal is budgeted and also is not resubmitted, it also is endorsed. Clause 3: once any proposal is endorsed and also has a milestone total of 78 or more and also is not resubmitted, it also is a pilot study. Clause 4: once any proposal has a milestone total over 37, it also is budgeted. Clause 5: once any proposal has a steering committee and also is renewed and also has seed funding, it also is shortlisted. Clause 6: once any proposal is endorsed and also has a milestone total under 78 and also is not resubmitted, it also is not a pilot study. Question: Does it follow that Betelgeuse is a pilot study?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006167", "pair_id": "u006167-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006167-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "c7048510a2256466", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006173-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a postal zone of 79. Odile is not damaged. Rasmus is sealed. Ulla is registered. Odile is not sealed. Rasmus is not delayed. Rasmus has a delivery window of 22. Rasmus has a postal zone of 68. Ulla has a parcel volume of 24. Ulla is not oversized. Rasmus is damaged. Rasmus is oversized. Odile has a parcel volume of 17. Odile is not registered. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 23.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is palletized plus has a delivery window no higher than 19: then it is not labeled. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is oversized plus is registered: then it is not perishable. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is palletized plus has a delivery window higher than 19: then it is labeled. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has a postal zone higher than 68: then it is not fragile. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is palletized. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is damaged: then it is perishable. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window no lower than 66: then it is not rerouted. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume no higher than 54 plus is delayed plus is sealed: then it is not scanned. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is damaged: then it is fragile. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy IX. Question: Is it so that Rasmus is not labeled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006173", "pair_id": "u006173-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006173-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b844a2f061ff8bd4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u006173-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a postal zone of 79. Odile is not damaged. Rasmus is sealed. Ulla is registered. Odile is not sealed. Rasmus is not delayed. Rasmus has a delivery window of 22. Rasmus has a postal zone of 68. Ulla has a parcel volume of 24. Ulla is not oversized. Rasmus is damaged. Rasmus is oversized. Odile has a parcel volume of 17. Odile is not registered. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 23.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is palletized plus has a delivery window no higher than 19: then it is not labeled. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is oversized plus is registered: then it is not perishable. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is palletized plus has a delivery window higher than 19: then it is labeled. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has a postal zone higher than 31: then it is not fragile. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is palletized. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is damaged: then it is perishable. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window no lower than 66: then it is not rerouted. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume no higher than 54 plus is delayed plus is sealed: then it is not scanned. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is damaged: then it is fragile. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy IX. Question: Is it so that Rasmus is not labeled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006173", "pair_id": "u006173-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006173-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d986eee9ff4f8e12", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u006213-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is profiled. Shale has no migration script. Shale is not localized. Shale is backported.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is compiled, so it is experimental. No. 2 While the given build is backported, so it is compiled. No. 3 While the given build is not obsolete, so it is tagged. No. 4 While the given build is experimental, so it is reverted. No. 5 While the given build is flaky, so it has no feature toggle. No. 6 While the given build is not localized, so it is signed. No. 7 While the given build is linted, so it is flaky. No. 8 While the given build has a migration script, so it is not minified. No. 9 While the given build is signed, so it is not obsolete. No. 10 While the given build has no feature toggle, so it is reproducible. No. 11 While the given build is profiled, so it is not reverted. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given build is localized. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given build is backported. No. 4 wins over No. 11. Question: Select what holds for Shale: which option?", "options": ["is reproducible", "is reverted", "is tagged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reverted", "unit_id": "u006213", "pair_id": "u006213-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006213-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "70b885bcc7aae92f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a11", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006213-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is profiled. Shale has no migration script. Shale is not localized. Shale is not backported.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is compiled, so it is experimental. No. 2 While the given build is backported, so it is compiled. No. 3 While the given build is not obsolete, so it is tagged. No. 4 While the given build is experimental, so it is reverted. No. 5 While the given build is flaky, so it has no feature toggle. No. 6 While the given build is not localized, so it is signed. No. 7 While the given build is linted, so it is flaky. No. 8 While the given build has a migration script, so it is not minified. No. 9 While the given build is signed, so it is not obsolete. No. 10 While the given build has no feature toggle, so it is reproducible. No. 11 While the given build is profiled, so it is not reverted. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given build is localized. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given build is backported. No. 4 wins over No. 11. Question: Select what holds for Shale: which option?", "options": ["is reproducible", "is reverted", "is tagged"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is tagged", "unit_id": "u006213", "pair_id": "u006213-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006213-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bc2ce31bbe27faa1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a11", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006223-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aldebaran is preregistered. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Aldebaran has no industry backing. Gemma is theoretical. Kochab has seed funding. Aldebaran has no patent filing. Gemma is not peer reviewed. Gemma has no seed funding. Gemma is not embargoed. Gemma is not collaborative. Gemma is preregistered. Aldebaran is not renewed. Gemma is not multicenter. Gemma has ethics clearance. Kochab is not budgeted. Gemma is budgeted. Kochab is theoretical. Aldebaran is theoretical. Kochab is not interdisciplinary. Gemma is interdisciplinary. Gemma has industry backing. Kochab has a patent filing. Aldebaran is not collaborative. Aldebaran is not interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is exploratory and is interdisciplinary and is renewed, then it is longitudinal. (2) If a proposal is preregistered and has ethics clearance, then it is a pilot study. (3) If a proposal is exploratory and has industry backing and is theoretical, then it is not longitudinal. (4) If a proposal has a patent filing and has seed funding, then it is resubmitted. (5) If a proposal is not embargoed, then it is cofunded. (6) If a proposal is budgeted and is interdisciplinary, then it is translational. (7) If a proposal is translational, then it is exploratory. (4) is void if the proposal is theoretical. (3) is void if the proposal is collaborative and is multicenter. (2) is void if the proposal is interdisciplinary. Question: Is it true that Gemma is longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006223", "pair_id": "u006223-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006223-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "47e3ca8acb5df3c5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006223-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aldebaran is preregistered. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Aldebaran has no industry backing. Gemma is theoretical. Kochab has seed funding. Aldebaran has no patent filing. Gemma is not peer reviewed. Gemma has no seed funding. Gemma is not embargoed. Gemma is not collaborative. Gemma is preregistered. Aldebaran is not renewed. Gemma is not multicenter. Gemma has ethics clearance. Kochab is not budgeted. Gemma is budgeted. Kochab is theoretical. Aldebaran is theoretical. Kochab is not interdisciplinary. Gemma is interdisciplinary. Gemma has industry backing. Kochab has a patent filing. Aldebaran is not collaborative. Aldebaran is not interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is exploratory and is interdisciplinary and is renewed, then it is longitudinal. (2) If a proposal is preregistered and has ethics clearance, then it is a pilot study. (3) If a proposal is exploratory and has industry backing and is theoretical, then it is not longitudinal. (4) If a proposal has a patent filing and has seed funding, then it is resubmitted. (5) If a proposal is embargoed, then it is cofunded. (6) If a proposal is budgeted and is interdisciplinary, then it is translational. (7) If a proposal is translational, then it is exploratory. (4) is void if the proposal is theoretical. (3) is void if the proposal is collaborative and is multicenter. (2) is void if the proposal is interdisciplinary. Question: Is it true that Gemma is longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006223", "pair_id": "u006223-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006223-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "20ec3f2a8c7c7990", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006233-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel has no locker slot. Quentin has a locker slot. Quentin is oversized. Jory is oversized. Quentin is undeliverable. Liesel is oversized. Liesel has no courier. Liesel is not refrigerated. Quentin is delayed. Quentin is scanned. Rasmus has no courier. Jory is scanned. Jory is hazardous. Jory is not delayed. Quentin is prepaid. Rasmus is not undeliverable. Liesel is not scanned. Liesel is hazardous. Jory is not prepaid. Jory is not refrigerated. Jory has a locker slot.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is prepaid and likewise has a courier, so it has no waybill. No. 2 While the given parcel is hazardous and likewise is not delayed, so it is not sealed. No. 3 While the given parcel is refrigerated and likewise has a locker slot and likewise is scanned, so it is not perishable. No. 4 While the given parcel is refrigerated and likewise is prepaid and likewise has a barcode, so it is perishable. No. 5 While the given parcel is hazardous and likewise is undeliverable and likewise is delayed, so it is labeled. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given parcel is oversized. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given parcel is refrigerated. Question: Is the claim \"Jory is perishable\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006233", "pair_id": "u006233-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006233-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "69ef985fa2c19c43", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u006233-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel has no locker slot. Quentin has a locker slot. Quentin is oversized. Jory is oversized. Quentin is undeliverable. Liesel is oversized. Liesel has no courier. Liesel is not refrigerated. Quentin is delayed. Quentin is scanned. Rasmus has no courier. Jory is scanned. Jory is hazardous. Jory is not delayed. Quentin is prepaid. Rasmus is not undeliverable. Liesel is not scanned. Liesel is hazardous. Jory is not prepaid. Jory is not refrigerated. Jory has a locker slot.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is prepaid and likewise has a courier, so it has no waybill. No. 2 While the given parcel is hazardous and likewise is delayed, so it is not sealed. No. 3 While the given parcel is refrigerated and likewise has a locker slot and likewise is scanned, so it is not perishable. No. 4 While the given parcel is refrigerated and likewise is prepaid and likewise has a barcode, so it is perishable. No. 5 While the given parcel is hazardous and likewise is undeliverable and likewise is delayed, so it is labeled. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given parcel is oversized. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given parcel is refrigerated. Question: Is the claim \"Jory is perishable\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006233", "pair_id": "u006233-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006233-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c9f95ee3d2daf161", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u006261-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale has a security advisory. Shale is not backported. Zircon has no security advisory.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a defect tally no lower than 77: then it is experimental. Policy II. Suppose that build is not backported: then it is notarized. Policy III. Suppose that build is backported: then it is not experimental. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a defect tally no higher than 26: then it is not notarized. Policy V. Suppose that build has a defect tally no higher than 63: then it is reverted. Policy VI. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is profiled. Policy VII. Suppose that build has a security advisory: then it is not reverted. Policy VIII. Suppose that build has a defect tally smaller than 33: then it is not profiled. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy VIII. Question: Is it so that Shale is not reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006261", "pair_id": "u006261-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006261-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "12fc7ac9105bf9c3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006261-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale has a security advisory. Shale is not backported. Zircon has no security advisory.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a defect tally no lower than 77: then it is experimental. Policy II. Suppose that build is backported: then it is notarized. Policy III. Suppose that build is backported: then it is not experimental. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a defect tally no higher than 26: then it is not notarized. Policy V. Suppose that build has a defect tally no higher than 63: then it is reverted. Policy VI. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is profiled. Policy VII. Suppose that build has a security advisory: then it is not reverted. Policy VIII. Suppose that build has a defect tally smaller than 33: then it is not profiled. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy VIII. Question: Is it so that Shale is not reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006261", "pair_id": "u006261-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006261-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fdfb4d223ae77b32", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006294-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not linted. Gneiss is benchmarked. Gneiss is not versioned. Gneiss has a feature toggle. Gneiss is minified. Gneiss is experimental. Gneiss has no migration script. Gneiss is notarized.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is merged and is not experimental, then it is not signed. (2) If a build is versioned, then it is obsolete. (3) If a build has no migration script, then it is not localized. (4) If a build is not flaky and has a feature toggle and is linted, then it is backported. (5) If a build has no migration script, then it is localized. (6) If a build is minified, then it is documented. (7) If a build is documented and is not versioned and is fuzzed, then it is not merged. (8) If a build is localized and is notarized, then it is merged. (9) If a build is versioned, then it is not backported. (10) If a build is merged and is experimental and is benchmarked, then it is signed. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. When (9) and (4) clash, (9) prevails. When (10) and (1) clash, (10) prevails. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Gneiss is signed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006294", "pair_id": "u006294-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006294-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9f47c20027eb24d7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a15", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006294-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not linted. Gneiss is benchmarked. Gneiss is not versioned. Gneiss has a feature toggle. Gneiss is minified. Gneiss is experimental. Gneiss has no migration script. Gneiss is notarized.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is merged and is not experimental, then it is not signed. (2) If a build is versioned, then it is obsolete. (3) If a build has no migration script, then it is not localized. (4) If a build is not flaky and has a feature toggle and is linted, then it is backported. (5) If a build has no migration script, then it is localized. (6) If a build is not minified, then it is documented. (7) If a build is documented and is not versioned and is fuzzed, then it is not merged. (8) If a build is localized and is notarized, then it is merged. (9) If a build is versioned, then it is not backported. (10) If a build is merged and is experimental and is benchmarked, then it is signed. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. When (9) and (4) clash, (9) prevails. When (10) and (1) clash, (10) prevails. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Gneiss is signed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006294", "pair_id": "u006294-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006294-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b39216c67af493df", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a15", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006294-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not linted. Gneiss is benchmarked. Gneiss is not versioned. Gneiss has a feature toggle. Gneiss is minified. Gneiss is experimental. Gneiss has no migration script. Gneiss is notarized.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is merged and also is not experimental, it also is not signed. Clause 2: once any build is versioned, it also is obsolete. Clause 3: once any build has no migration script, it also is not localized. Clause 4: once any build is not flaky and also has a feature toggle and also is linted, it also is backported. Clause 5: once any build has no migration script, it also is localized. Clause 6: once any build is minified, it also is documented. Clause 7: once any build is documented and also is not versioned and also is fuzzed, it also is not merged. Clause 8: once any build is localized and also is notarized, it also is merged. Clause 9: once any build is versioned, it also is not backported. Clause 10: once any build is merged and also is experimental and also is benchmarked, it also is signed. Clause 8 overrides Clause 7. Clause 9 overrides Clause 4. Clause 10 overrides Clause 1. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Gneiss is signed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006294", "pair_id": "u006294-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006294-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9f47c20027eb24d7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a15", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006294-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not linted. Gneiss is benchmarked. Gneiss is not versioned. Gneiss has a feature toggle. Gneiss is minified. Gneiss is experimental. Gneiss has no migration script. Gneiss is notarized.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is merged and also is not experimental, it also is not signed. Clause 2: once any build is versioned, it also is obsolete. Clause 3: once any build has no migration script, it also is not localized. Clause 4: once any build is not flaky and also has a feature toggle and also is linted, it also is backported. Clause 5: once any build has no migration script, it also is localized. Clause 6: once any build is not minified, it also is documented. Clause 7: once any build is documented and also is not versioned and also is fuzzed, it also is not merged. Clause 8: once any build is localized and also is notarized, it also is merged. Clause 9: once any build is versioned, it also is not backported. Clause 10: once any build is merged and also is experimental and also is benchmarked, it also is signed. Clause 8 overrides Clause 7. Clause 9 overrides Clause 4. Clause 10 overrides Clause 1. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Gneiss is signed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006294", "pair_id": "u006294-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006294-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b39216c67af493df", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a15", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006308-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is not recommended. Jasna is recommended. Olek is not a veteran. Olek has no signing bonus. Kalle has a signing bonus. Kalle is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is onboarded provided that it is not recommended. Section 2: a candidate is eligible provided that it is certified. Section 3: a candidate is certified provided that it has no signing bonus. Section 4: a candidate is not unionized provided that it is a veteran. Section 5: a candidate has a background screening provided that it is sponsored. Section 6: a candidate is relocating provided that it is recommended. Section 7: a candidate is not eligible provided that it is onboarded. Question: Kalle is eligible. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006308", "pair_id": "u006308-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006308-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "b5b3f45a01b12944", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006308-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is not recommended. Jasna is recommended. Olek is not a veteran. Olek has no signing bonus. Kalle has a signing bonus. Kalle is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is onboarded provided that it is recommended. Section 2: a candidate is eligible provided that it is certified. Section 3: a candidate is certified provided that it has no signing bonus. Section 4: a candidate is not unionized provided that it is a veteran. Section 5: a candidate has a background screening provided that it is sponsored. Section 6: a candidate is relocating provided that it is recommended. Section 7: a candidate is not eligible provided that it is onboarded. Question: Kalle is eligible. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006308", "pair_id": "u006308-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006308-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "ca578fecf7d6d5b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006308-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is not recommended. Jasna is recommended. Olek is not a veteran. Olek has no signing bonus. Kalle has a signing bonus. Kalle is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is not recommended: then it is onboarded. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is certified: then it is eligible. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has no signing bonus: then it is certified. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is a veteran: then it is not unionized. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is sponsored: then it has a background screening. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is recommended: then it is relocating. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate is onboarded: then it is not eligible. Question: Is it so that Kalle is eligible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006308", "pair_id": "u006308-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006308-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "b5b3f45a01b12944", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006308-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is not recommended. Jasna is recommended. Olek is not a veteran. Olek has no signing bonus. Kalle has a signing bonus. Kalle is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is recommended: then it is onboarded. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is certified: then it is eligible. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has no signing bonus: then it is certified. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is a veteran: then it is not unionized. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is sponsored: then it has a background screening. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is recommended: then it is relocating. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate is onboarded: then it is not eligible. Question: Is it so that Kalle is eligible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006308", "pair_id": "u006308-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006308-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "ca578fecf7d6d5b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006317-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is prepaid. Quentin is not labeled. Mirela is scanned. Saskia is not misrouted. Quentin is not refrigerated. Quentin is misrouted. Mirela is not labeled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is prepaid: then it is tracked. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is perishable. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is consolidated. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it is not consolidated. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated: then it is not fragile. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated: then it is fragile. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is not perishable. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is undeliverable: then it is palletized. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it has a locker slot. Policy X. Suppose that parcel is not labeled: then it is registered. Policy XI. Suppose that parcel has a locker slot: then it is damaged. Policy XII. Suppose that parcel is scanned: then it is undeliverable. Policy III is waived if that parcel has a barcode. Policy VIII is waived if that parcel has a barcode. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy IV. Question: Which choice is right for Quentin?", "options": ["is damaged", "is consolidated", "is perishable", "is palletized"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is perishable", "unit_id": "u006317", "pair_id": "u006317-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006317-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a7935621fdd500f0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a14", "a12", "a2"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006317-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is prepaid. Quentin is not labeled. Mirela is scanned. Saskia is not misrouted. Quentin is not refrigerated. Quentin is misrouted. Mirela is not labeled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is prepaid: then it is tracked. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is perishable. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is consolidated. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it is not consolidated. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated: then it is not fragile. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated: then it is fragile. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is not perishable. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is undeliverable: then it is palletized. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it has a locker slot. Policy X. Suppose that parcel is labeled: then it is registered. Policy XI. Suppose that parcel has a locker slot: then it is damaged. Policy XII. Suppose that parcel is scanned: then it is undeliverable. Policy III is waived if that parcel has a barcode. Policy VIII is waived if that parcel has a barcode. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy IV. Question: Which choice is right for Quentin?", "options": ["is damaged", "is consolidated", "is perishable", "is palletized"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is perishable", "unit_id": "u006317", "pair_id": "u006317-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006317-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "11c78aa30eb19ec0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a14", "a12", "a2"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006377-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a debt ratio of 84. Greta is overdrawn. Tomas is not bankrupt. Greta has a debt ratio of 66. Ilse is not overdrawn. Evren is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is not pensioned provided that it is not bankrupt. Section 2: a borrower is pensioned provided that it has a debt ratio of 53 or lower. Section 3: a borrower is solvent provided that it is overdrawn. Question: Ilse is pensioned. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006377", "pair_id": "u006377-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006377-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "0e30d20caea77146", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006377-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a debt ratio of 84. Greta is overdrawn. Tomas is not bankrupt. Greta has a debt ratio of 66. Ilse is not overdrawn. Evren is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is not pensioned provided that it is not bankrupt. Section 2: a borrower is pensioned provided that it has a debt ratio exceeding 53. Section 3: a borrower is solvent provided that it is overdrawn. Question: Ilse is pensioned. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006377", "pair_id": "u006377-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006377-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "105da919de6c2b02", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006377-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a debt ratio of 84. Greta is overdrawn. Tomas is not bankrupt. Greta has a debt ratio of 66. Ilse is not overdrawn. Evren is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is not bankrupt: then it is not pensioned. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has a debt ratio no higher than 53: then it is pensioned. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is overdrawn: then it is solvent. Question: Is it so that Ilse is pensioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006377", "pair_id": "u006377-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006377-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "0e30d20caea77146", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006377-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a debt ratio of 84. Greta is overdrawn. Tomas is not bankrupt. Greta has a debt ratio of 66. Ilse is not overdrawn. Evren is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is not bankrupt: then it is not pensioned. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has a debt ratio higher than 53: then it is pensioned. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is overdrawn: then it is solvent. Question: Is it so that Ilse is pensioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006377", "pair_id": "u006377-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006377-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "105da919de6c2b02", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006377-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a debt ratio of 84. Greta is overdrawn. Tomas is not bankrupt. Greta has a debt ratio of 66. Ilse is not overdrawn. Evren is bankrupt.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is not bankrupt, it then is not pensioned. #2 Each time a borrower has a debt ratio of 53 or below, it then is pensioned. #3 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is solvent. Question: Do the terms above show that Ilse is pensioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006377", "pair_id": "u006377-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006377-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "0e30d20caea77146", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006377-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a debt ratio of 84. Greta is overdrawn. Tomas is not bankrupt. Greta has a debt ratio of 66. Ilse is not overdrawn. Evren is bankrupt.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is not bankrupt, it then is not pensioned. #2 Each time a borrower has a debt ratio greater than 53, it then is pensioned. #3 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is solvent. Question: Do the terms above show that Ilse is pensioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006377", "pair_id": "u006377-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006377-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "105da919de6c2b02", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006393-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has a deductible waiver. Bruno is a claimant. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 18. Fabian is not disputed. Fabian is a claimant.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beyond 17, thus it has an adjuster. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is subrogated. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is not grandfathered. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is grandfathered, thus it is not bundled. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beyond 60. Provision 4 has no effect when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling at or above 36. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling at or below 60. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here is disputed. Question: Would it be right to say that Fabian is grandfathered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006393", "pair_id": "u006393-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006393-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e8d014bd5ab614f4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006393-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has a deductible waiver. Bruno is a claimant. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 18. Fabian is not disputed. Fabian is a claimant.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beyond 55, thus it has an adjuster. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is subrogated. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is not grandfathered. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is grandfathered, thus it is not bundled. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beyond 60. Provision 4 has no effect when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling at or above 36. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling at or below 60. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here is disputed. Question: Would it be right to say that Fabian is grandfathered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006393", "pair_id": "u006393-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006393-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "978dde443c1203ab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006393-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has a deductible waiver. Bruno is a claimant. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 18. Fabian is not disputed. Fabian is a claimant.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a payout ceiling that exceeds 17, so it has an adjuster. No. 2 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is subrogated. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it is not grandfathered. No. 4 While the given policyholder is grandfathered, so it is not bundled. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it is grandfathered. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a payout ceiling that exceeds 60. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a deductible waiver. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a payout ceiling not below 36. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a payout ceiling not above 60. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is disputed. Question: Is the claim \"Fabian is grandfathered\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006393", "pair_id": "u006393-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006393-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e8d014bd5ab614f4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006393-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has a deductible waiver. Bruno is a claimant. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 18. Fabian is not disputed. Fabian is a claimant.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a payout ceiling that exceeds 55, so it has an adjuster. No. 2 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is subrogated. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it is not grandfathered. No. 4 While the given policyholder is grandfathered, so it is not bundled. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it is grandfathered. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a payout ceiling that exceeds 60. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a deductible waiver. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a payout ceiling not below 36. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a payout ceiling not above 60. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is disputed. Question: Is the claim \"Fabian is grandfathered\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006393", "pair_id": "u006393-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006393-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "978dde443c1203ab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006411-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zircon has a test yield of 76.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a test yield that falls below 77, so it is not profiled. No. 2 While the given build is reverted, so it is notarized. No. 3 While the given build has a lint backlog that exceeds 43, so it is documented. No. 4 While the given build is merged, so it has a changelog. No. 5 While the given build is benchmarked, so it is fuzzed. No. 6 While the given build has a test yield not below 77, so it is reverted. No. 7 While the given build is not profiled, so it is localized. Question: Select what holds for Zircon: which option?", "options": ["is notarized", "is localized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is localized", "unit_id": "u006411", "pair_id": "u006411-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006411-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "c250c48f4834c863", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006411-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zircon has a test yield of 2.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a test yield that falls below 77, so it is not profiled. No. 2 While the given build is reverted, so it is notarized. No. 3 While the given build has a lint backlog that exceeds 43, so it is documented. No. 4 While the given build is merged, so it has a changelog. No. 5 While the given build is benchmarked, so it is fuzzed. No. 6 While the given build has a test yield not below 77, so it is reverted. No. 7 While the given build is not profiled, so it is localized. Question: Select what holds for Zircon: which option?", "options": ["is notarized", "is localized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is localized", "unit_id": "u006411", "pair_id": "u006411-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006411-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "ac6080b11d678f27", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006422-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is isolated. Borealis has a replica count of 40.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is isolated, then it is not sharded. (2) If a workload has a replica count of at most 58, then it is sharded. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Borealis is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006422", "pair_id": "u006422-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006422-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "12a4c4580a64c8d6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006422-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is not isolated. Borealis has a replica count of 40.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is isolated, then it is not sharded. (2) If a workload has a replica count of at most 58, then it is sharded. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Borealis is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006422", "pair_id": "u006422-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006422-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "541aeb6ec8db8614", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006422-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is isolated. Borealis has a replica count of 40.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is isolated, it also is not sharded. Clause 2: once any workload has a replica count of 58 or less, it also is sharded. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Borealis is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006422", "pair_id": "u006422-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006422-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "12a4c4580a64c8d6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006422-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is not isolated. Borealis has a replica count of 40.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is isolated, it also is not sharded. Clause 2: once any workload has a replica count of 58 or less, it also is sharded. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Borealis is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006422", "pair_id": "u006422-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006422-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "541aeb6ec8db8614", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006422-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is isolated. Borealis has a replica count of 40.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is isolated, that workload is not sharded. Item B. When the workload has a replica count of no more than 58, that workload is sharded. Item A outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Borealis is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006422", "pair_id": "u006422-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006422-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "12a4c4580a64c8d6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006422-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is not isolated. Borealis has a replica count of 40.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is isolated, that workload is not sharded. Item B. When the workload has a replica count of no more than 58, that workload is sharded. Item A outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Borealis is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006422", "pair_id": "u006422-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006422-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "541aeb6ec8db8614", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006429-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is appraised. Zdenek is litigated. Celeste is appraised. Celeste is not litigated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also has a premium discount. Clause 2: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is not covered. Clause 3: once any policyholder is litigated, it also is grandfathered. Clause 4: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is not grandfathered. Question: Does it follow that Zdenek is not grandfathered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006429", "pair_id": "u006429-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006429-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "9b4f1d8836a3c4b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006429-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is appraised. Zdenek is litigated. Celeste is appraised. Celeste is not litigated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is appraised, it also is subrogated. Clause 2: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also has a premium discount. Clause 3: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is not covered. Clause 4: once any policyholder is litigated, it also is grandfathered. Clause 5: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is not grandfathered. Question: Does it follow that Zdenek is not grandfathered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006429", "pair_id": "u006429-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006429-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "5055c5fddb8c191c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006457-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is stamped. Ulla is damaged. Nandor is not damaged. Ulla is not misrouted. Nandor has no locker slot. Ulla is weighed. Ulla has a postal zone of 18. Ulla is stamped. Nandor is weighed. Nandor is misrouted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is registered provided that it is damaged. Section 2: a parcel is scanned provided that it has a barcode as well as is misrouted. Section 3: a parcel is delayed provided that it has a locker slot. Section 4: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is registered. Section 5: a parcel is tracked provided that it has a barcode as well as is stamped as well as has a postal zone of 78 or lower. Section 6: a parcel is rerouted provided that it has a barcode as well as has a postal zone of 88 or lower as well as is weighed. Section 6 lapses for a parcel if it is stamped. Question: Which statement fits Ulla?", "options": ["is tracked", "is scanned", "is rerouted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u006457", "pair_id": "u006457-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/10", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006457-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f5fe9413b30ffcb1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a2", "a0"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006457-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is stamped. Ulla is damaged. Nandor is not damaged. Ulla is not misrouted. Nandor has no locker slot. Ulla is weighed. Ulla has a postal zone of 18. Ulla is stamped. Nandor is weighed. Nandor is misrouted. Ulla has a locker slot.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is registered provided that it is damaged. Section 2: a parcel is scanned provided that it has a barcode as well as is misrouted. Section 3: a parcel is delayed provided that it has a locker slot. Section 4: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is registered. Section 5: a parcel is tracked provided that it has a barcode as well as is stamped as well as has a postal zone of 78 or lower. Section 6: a parcel is rerouted provided that it has a barcode as well as has a postal zone of 88 or lower as well as is weighed. Section 6 lapses for a parcel if it is stamped. Question: Which statement fits Ulla?", "options": ["is tracked", "is scanned", "is rerouted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u006457", "pair_id": "u006457-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/10", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006457-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "30f263c6891664ca", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a2", "a0"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006457-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is stamped. Ulla is damaged. Nandor is not damaged. Ulla is not misrouted. Nandor has no locker slot. Ulla is weighed. Ulla has a postal zone of 18. Ulla is stamped. Nandor is weighed. Nandor is misrouted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is damaged, it then is registered. #2 Each time a parcel has a barcode and additionally is misrouted, it then is scanned. #3 Each time a parcel has a locker slot, it then is delayed. #4 Each time a parcel is registered, it then has a barcode. #5 Each time a parcel has a barcode and additionally is stamped and additionally has a postal zone of 78 or below, it then is tracked. #6 Each time a parcel has a barcode and additionally has a postal zone of 88 or below and additionally is weighed, it then is rerouted. #6 is set aside if a parcel is stamped. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Ulla?", "options": ["is tracked", "is scanned", "is rerouted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u006457", "pair_id": "u006457-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/10", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006457-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f5fe9413b30ffcb1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a2", "a0"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006457-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is stamped. Ulla is damaged. Nandor is not damaged. Ulla is not misrouted. Nandor has no locker slot. Ulla is weighed. Ulla has a postal zone of 18. Ulla is stamped. Nandor is weighed. Nandor is misrouted. Ulla has a locker slot.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is damaged, it then is registered. #2 Each time a parcel has a barcode and additionally is misrouted, it then is scanned. #3 Each time a parcel has a locker slot, it then is delayed. #4 Each time a parcel is registered, it then has a barcode. #5 Each time a parcel has a barcode and additionally is stamped and additionally has a postal zone of 78 or below, it then is tracked. #6 Each time a parcel has a barcode and additionally has a postal zone of 88 or below and additionally is weighed, it then is rerouted. #6 is set aside if a parcel is stamped. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Ulla?", "options": ["is tracked", "is scanned", "is rerouted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u006457", "pair_id": "u006457-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/10", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006457-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "30f263c6891664ca", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a2", "a0"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006467-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is monitored. Orrery is idle. Orrery is virtualized. Borealis has a snapshot. Halcyon has a snapshot. Halcyon is not idle. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 24. Orrery has a snapshot. Orrery is replicated. Borealis is stateless. Cobalt is idle. Borealis is virtualized. Cobalt is not replicated. Orrery has a memory allotment of 4. Borealis has a public endpoint. Halcyon is cached. Cobalt is not virtualized. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 37. Orrery is not cached. Orrery is stateless. Halcyon is isolated. Halcyon has a public endpoint. Borealis is monitored. Halcyon is not virtualized. Borealis is provisioned.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is provisioned while is virtualized, thus it is containerized. Provision 2: when the workload here has a snapshot while is cached, thus it is autoscaled. Provision 3: when the workload here has a public endpoint while is monitored, thus it is deprecated. Provision 4: when the workload here is autoscaled, thus it is backed up. Provision 5: when the workload here is backed up while has a memory allotment beneath 63 while is replicated, thus it has a firewall. Provision 6: when the workload here is backed up while has a memory allotment beneath 63, thus it has no firewall. Provision 6 has no effect when the workload here is idle while is virtualized. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here is stateless. Provision 2 has no effect when the workload here is cached while is provisioned. Question: Would it be right to say that Halcyon has a firewall?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006467", "pair_id": "u006467-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006467-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "247fc217d2234741", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u006467-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is monitored. Orrery is idle. Orrery is virtualized. Borealis has a snapshot. Halcyon has a snapshot. Halcyon is not idle. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 24. Orrery has a snapshot. Orrery is replicated. Borealis is stateless. Cobalt is idle. Borealis is virtualized. Cobalt is not replicated. Orrery has a memory allotment of 4. Borealis has a public endpoint. Halcyon is cached. Cobalt is not virtualized. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 37. Orrery is not cached. Orrery is stateless. Halcyon is isolated. Halcyon has a public endpoint. Borealis is monitored. Halcyon is not virtualized. Borealis is provisioned.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is provisioned while is virtualized, thus it is containerized. Provision 2: when the workload here has a snapshot while is cached, thus it is autoscaled. Provision 3: when the workload here has a public endpoint while is monitored, thus it is deprecated. Provision 4: when the workload here is autoscaled, thus it is backed up. Provision 5: when the workload here is backed up while has a memory allotment beneath 63 while is replicated, thus it has a firewall. Provision 6: when the workload here is backed up while has a memory allotment at or above 63, thus it has no firewall. Provision 6 has no effect when the workload here is idle while is virtualized. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here is stateless. Provision 2 has no effect when the workload here is cached while is provisioned. Question: Would it be right to say that Halcyon has a firewall?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006467", "pair_id": "u006467-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006467-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1962e265f25217c1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u006467-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is monitored. Orrery is idle. Orrery is virtualized. Borealis has a snapshot. Halcyon has a snapshot. Halcyon is not idle. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 24. Orrery has a snapshot. Orrery is replicated. Borealis is stateless. Cobalt is idle. Borealis is virtualized. Cobalt is not replicated. Orrery has a memory allotment of 4. Borealis has a public endpoint. Halcyon is cached. Cobalt is not virtualized. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 37. Orrery is not cached. Orrery is stateless. Halcyon is isolated. Halcyon has a public endpoint. Borealis is monitored. Halcyon is not virtualized. Borealis is provisioned.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is provisioned and further is virtualized, it thereby is containerized. Point B. If said workload has a snapshot and further is cached, it thereby is autoscaled. Point C. If said workload has a public endpoint and further is monitored, it thereby is deprecated. Point D. If said workload is autoscaled, it thereby is backed up. Point E. If said workload is backed up and further has a memory allotment short of 63 and further is replicated, it thereby has a firewall. Point F. If said workload is backed up and further has a memory allotment short of 63, it thereby has no firewall. Point F is cancelled if said workload is idle and further is virtualized. Point A is cancelled if said workload is stateless. Point B is cancelled if said workload is cached and further is provisioned. Question: Statement: Halcyon has a firewall. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006467", "pair_id": "u006467-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006467-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "247fc217d2234741", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u006467-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is monitored. Orrery is idle. Orrery is virtualized. Borealis has a snapshot. Halcyon has a snapshot. Halcyon is not idle. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 24. Orrery has a snapshot. Orrery is replicated. Borealis is stateless. Cobalt is idle. Borealis is virtualized. Cobalt is not replicated. Orrery has a memory allotment of 4. Borealis has a public endpoint. Halcyon is cached. Cobalt is not virtualized. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 37. Orrery is not cached. Orrery is stateless. Halcyon is isolated. Halcyon has a public endpoint. Borealis is monitored. Halcyon is not virtualized. Borealis is provisioned.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is provisioned and further is virtualized, it thereby is containerized. Point B. If said workload has a snapshot and further is cached, it thereby is autoscaled. Point C. If said workload has a public endpoint and further is monitored, it thereby is deprecated. Point D. If said workload is autoscaled, it thereby is backed up. Point E. If said workload is backed up and further has a memory allotment short of 63 and further is replicated, it thereby has a firewall. Point F. If said workload is backed up and further has a memory allotment of minimum 63, it thereby has no firewall. Point F is cancelled if said workload is idle and further is virtualized. Point A is cancelled if said workload is stateless. Point B is cancelled if said workload is cached and further is provisioned. Question: Statement: Halcyon has a firewall. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006467", "pair_id": "u006467-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006467-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1962e265f25217c1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u006471-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas has no collateral. Tomas is not a homeowner. Tomas is garnished.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is underwritten provided that it is employed. Section 2: a borrower is indebted provided that it is a homeowner. Section 3: a borrower is solvent provided that it is pensioned. Section 4: a borrower is not solvent provided that it is underwritten. Section 5: a borrower is employed provided that it has collateral. Section 6: a borrower is vetted provided that it is garnished. Section 7: a borrower is pensioned provided that it is vetted. Question: Tomas is not solvent. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006471", "pair_id": "u006471-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006471-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "aab7fc917eaf1c74", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006471-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas has no collateral. Tomas is not a homeowner. Tomas is garnished.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is underwritten provided that it is employed. Section 2: a borrower is indebted provided that it is a homeowner. Section 3: a borrower is solvent provided that it is pensioned. Section 4: a borrower is not solvent provided that it is underwritten. Section 5: a borrower is employed provided that it has collateral. Section 6: a borrower is bankrupt provided that it is vetted. Section 7: a borrower is vetted provided that it is garnished. Section 8: a borrower is pensioned provided that it is vetted. Question: Tomas is not solvent. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006471", "pair_id": "u006471-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006471-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "d5705feae7c05978", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006475-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste has an adjuster. Zdenek has an adjuster. Celeste is bundled. Celeste is subrogated. Viggo has no beneficiary. Agata has an adjuster. Agata has no beneficiary. Zdenek is not bundled. Viggo is not subrogated. Celeste is grandfathered. Celeste is uninsurable. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Viggo is bundled. Celeste is not retired. Viggo is uninsurable. Agata is bundled. Viggo is grandfathered. Zdenek has a beneficiary. Agata is not uninsurable. Celeste is litigated. Celeste has no dashcam.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is not litigated while is grandfathered, thus it has no rider. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has no flood coverage while has no dashcam, thus it is not lapsed. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary, thus it has flood coverage. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is not bundled, thus it is covered. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has flood coverage while has a dashcam while has no adjuster, thus it is lapsed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it has no flood coverage. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it has no premium discount. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 4 has no effect when the policyholder here has a beneficiary. Provision 8 has no effect when the policyholder here has a beneficiary. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here has an adjuster. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here is uninsurable while has a dashcam. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Celeste is lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006475", "pair_id": "u006475-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006475-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "39e7aa4c2353afb6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u006475-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste has an adjuster. Zdenek has an adjuster. Celeste is bundled. Celeste is subrogated. Viggo has no beneficiary. Agata has an adjuster. Agata has no beneficiary. Zdenek is not bundled. Viggo is not subrogated. Celeste is grandfathered. Celeste is uninsurable. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Viggo is bundled. Celeste is not retired. Viggo is uninsurable. Agata is bundled. Viggo is grandfathered. Zdenek has a beneficiary. Agata is not uninsurable. Celeste is litigated. Celeste has no dashcam.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is not litigated while is grandfathered, thus it has no rider. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has flood coverage while has no dashcam, thus it is not lapsed. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary, thus it has flood coverage. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is not bundled, thus it is covered. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has flood coverage while has a dashcam while has no adjuster, thus it is lapsed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it has no flood coverage. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it has no premium discount. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 4 has no effect when the policyholder here has a beneficiary. Provision 8 has no effect when the policyholder here has a beneficiary. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here has an adjuster. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here is uninsurable while has a dashcam. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Celeste is lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006475", "pair_id": "u006475-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006475-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1cc2e7e58c8e3037", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u006533-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a locker slot. Ulla is not labeled. Ulla is hazardous. Ulla is not misrouted. Ulla is not oversized.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is perishable provided that it is labeled. Section 2: a parcel is registered provided that it is oversized. Section 3: a parcel is not prepaid provided that it is registered as well as is misrouted as well as is labeled. Section 4: a parcel is prepaid provided that it is registered as well as is oversized as well as has a locker slot. Section 5: a parcel is sealed provided that it is tracked as well as is labeled as well as is hazardous. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Ulla is prepaid. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006533", "pair_id": "u006533-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006533-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "401b48d67dd3d033", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u006533-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a locker slot. Ulla is labeled. Ulla is hazardous. Ulla is not misrouted. Ulla is not oversized.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is perishable provided that it is labeled. Section 2: a parcel is registered provided that it is oversized. Section 3: a parcel is not prepaid provided that it is registered as well as is misrouted as well as is labeled. Section 4: a parcel is prepaid provided that it is registered as well as is oversized as well as has a locker slot. Section 5: a parcel is sealed provided that it is tracked as well as is labeled as well as is hazardous. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Ulla is prepaid. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006533", "pair_id": "u006533-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006533-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea15afd81884655b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u006533-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a locker slot. Ulla is not labeled. Ulla is hazardous. Ulla is not misrouted. Ulla is not oversized.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is labeled: then it is perishable. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is registered. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is registered plus is misrouted plus is labeled: then it is not prepaid. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is registered plus is oversized plus has a locker slot: then it is prepaid. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is tracked plus is labeled plus is hazardous: then it is sealed. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Ulla is prepaid?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006533", "pair_id": "u006533-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006533-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "401b48d67dd3d033", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u006533-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a locker slot. Ulla is labeled. Ulla is hazardous. Ulla is not misrouted. Ulla is not oversized.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is labeled: then it is perishable. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is registered. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is registered plus is misrouted plus is labeled: then it is not prepaid. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is registered plus is oversized plus has a locker slot: then it is prepaid. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is tracked plus is labeled plus is hazardous: then it is sealed. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Ulla is prepaid?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006533", "pair_id": "u006533-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006533-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea15afd81884655b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u006533-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a locker slot. Ulla is not labeled. Ulla is hazardous. Ulla is not misrouted. Ulla is not oversized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is labeled, it then is perishable. #2 Each time a parcel is oversized, it then is registered. #3 Each time a parcel is registered and additionally is misrouted and additionally is labeled, it then is not prepaid. #4 Each time a parcel is registered and additionally is oversized and additionally has a locker slot, it then is prepaid. #5 Each time a parcel is tracked and additionally is labeled and additionally is hazardous, it then is sealed. #3 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Ulla is prepaid?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006533", "pair_id": "u006533-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006533-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "401b48d67dd3d033", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u006533-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a locker slot. Ulla is labeled. Ulla is hazardous. Ulla is not misrouted. Ulla is not oversized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is labeled, it then is perishable. #2 Each time a parcel is oversized, it then is registered. #3 Each time a parcel is registered and additionally is misrouted and additionally is labeled, it then is not prepaid. #4 Each time a parcel is registered and additionally is oversized and additionally has a locker slot, it then is prepaid. #5 Each time a parcel is tracked and additionally is labeled and additionally is hazardous, it then is sealed. #3 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Ulla is prepaid?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006533", "pair_id": "u006533-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006533-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea15afd81884655b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u006546-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is not pregnant. Yusuf has a pacemaker. Cosima is not postoperative. Cosima has no caregiver. Gunnar is not fasting. Yusuf is not postoperative. Cosima has a pacemaker. Gunnar has a pacemaker. Gunnar has no caregiver. Cosima is sedated. Yusuf is not vaccinated. Cosima is allergic. Cosima is not fasting. Yusuf is symptomatic. Gunnar is symptomatic. Cosima is symptomatic. Cosima is pregnant.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is pregnant plus has no caregiver: then it is not referred. Policy II. Suppose that patient has a pacemaker plus is fasting: then it has an interpreter. Policy III. Suppose that patient is postoperative: then it is bedridden. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is pregnant plus has a caregiver plus is sedated: then it is referred. Policy V. Suppose that patient is referred: then it is not bedridden. Policy VI. Suppose that patient has a caregiver: then it has no interpreter. Policy I is waived if that patient is vaccinated plus is not postoperative. Policy V is waived if that patient is symptomatic. Policy I is waived if that patient is not postoperative plus has a caregiver. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Cosima is referred?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006546", "pair_id": "u006546-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006546-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ef76f5be8f3113de", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006546-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is not pregnant. Yusuf has a pacemaker. Cosima is not postoperative. Cosima has a caregiver. Gunnar is not fasting. Yusuf is not postoperative. Cosima has a pacemaker. Gunnar has a pacemaker. Gunnar has no caregiver. Cosima is sedated. Yusuf is not vaccinated. Cosima is allergic. Cosima is not fasting. Yusuf is symptomatic. Gunnar is symptomatic. Cosima is symptomatic. Cosima is pregnant.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is pregnant plus has no caregiver: then it is not referred. Policy II. Suppose that patient has a pacemaker plus is fasting: then it has an interpreter. Policy III. Suppose that patient is postoperative: then it is bedridden. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is pregnant plus has a caregiver plus is sedated: then it is referred. Policy V. Suppose that patient is referred: then it is not bedridden. Policy VI. Suppose that patient has a caregiver: then it has no interpreter. Policy I is waived if that patient is vaccinated plus is not postoperative. Policy V is waived if that patient is symptomatic. Policy I is waived if that patient is not postoperative plus has a caregiver. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Cosima is referred?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006546", "pair_id": "u006546-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006546-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a289b8b650ab85c6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006546-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is not pregnant. Yusuf has a pacemaker. Cosima is not postoperative. Cosima has no caregiver. Gunnar is not fasting. Yusuf is not postoperative. Cosima has a pacemaker. Gunnar has a pacemaker. Gunnar has no caregiver. Cosima is sedated. Yusuf is not vaccinated. Cosima is allergic. Cosima is not fasting. Yusuf is symptomatic. Gunnar is symptomatic. Cosima is symptomatic. Cosima is pregnant.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is pregnant and additionally has no caregiver, it then is not referred. #2 Each time a patient has a pacemaker and additionally is fasting, it then has an interpreter. #3 Each time a patient is postoperative, it then is bedridden. #4 Each time a patient is pregnant and additionally has a caregiver and additionally is sedated, it then is referred. #5 Each time a patient is referred, it then is not bedridden. #6 Each time a patient has a caregiver, it then has no interpreter. #1 is set aside if a patient is vaccinated and additionally is not postoperative. #5 is set aside if a patient is symptomatic. #1 is set aside if a patient is not postoperative and additionally has a caregiver. #1 yields to #4. #6 yields to #2. #3 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Cosima is referred?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006546", "pair_id": "u006546-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006546-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ef76f5be8f3113de", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006546-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is not pregnant. Yusuf has a pacemaker. Cosima is not postoperative. Cosima has a caregiver. Gunnar is not fasting. Yusuf is not postoperative. Cosima has a pacemaker. Gunnar has a pacemaker. Gunnar has no caregiver. Cosima is sedated. Yusuf is not vaccinated. Cosima is allergic. Cosima is not fasting. Yusuf is symptomatic. Gunnar is symptomatic. Cosima is symptomatic. Cosima is pregnant.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is pregnant and additionally has no caregiver, it then is not referred. #2 Each time a patient has a pacemaker and additionally is fasting, it then has an interpreter. #3 Each time a patient is postoperative, it then is bedridden. #4 Each time a patient is pregnant and additionally has a caregiver and additionally is sedated, it then is referred. #5 Each time a patient is referred, it then is not bedridden. #6 Each time a patient has a caregiver, it then has no interpreter. #1 is set aside if a patient is vaccinated and additionally is not postoperative. #5 is set aside if a patient is symptomatic. #1 is set aside if a patient is not postoperative and additionally has a caregiver. #1 yields to #4. #6 yields to #2. #3 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Cosima is referred?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006546", "pair_id": "u006546-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006546-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a289b8b650ab85c6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006547-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma is peer reviewed. Gemma has a citation index of 17. Aldebaran is peer reviewed. Aldebaran has a citation index of 88. Gemma has no industry backing. Nashira is not peer reviewed. Mirach has industry backing. Nashira has industry backing.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is shortlisted, it then is exploratory. #2 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then has a steering committee. #3 Each time a proposal is not multicenter, it then has a field site. #4 Each time a proposal has a field site, it then is a pilot study. #5 Each time a proposal is exploratory, it then is not a pilot study. #6 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then is multicenter. #7 Each time a proposal has a citation index of 22 or above, it then is not multicenter. #8 Each time a proposal is multicenter, it then is embargoed. #9 Each time a proposal has industry backing, it then has no steering committee. #4 yields to #5. #6 yields to #7. #9 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Gemma is a pilot study?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006547", "pair_id": "u006547-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006547-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9653050800d58196", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006547-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma is peer reviewed. Gemma has a citation index of 17. Aldebaran is peer reviewed. Aldebaran has a citation index of 88. Gemma has no industry backing. Nashira is not peer reviewed. Mirach has industry backing. Nashira has industry backing.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is shortlisted, it then is exploratory. #2 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then has a steering committee. #3 Each time a proposal is not multicenter, it then has a field site. #4 Each time a proposal has a field site, it then is a pilot study. #5 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then is shortlisted. #6 Each time a proposal is exploratory, it then is not a pilot study. #7 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then is multicenter. #8 Each time a proposal has a citation index of 22 or above, it then is not multicenter. #9 Each time a proposal is multicenter, it then is embargoed. #10 Each time a proposal has industry backing, it then has no steering committee. #4 yields to #6. #7 yields to #8. #10 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Gemma is a pilot study?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006547", "pair_id": "u006547-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006547-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b4372d9489ceea62", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006555-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is bankrupt. Bastien is not underwritten. Tomas is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is garnished provided that it is not bankrupt. Section 2: a borrower is not indebted provided that it is underwritten. Section 3: a borrower is not garnished provided that it has an escrow account. Question: Bastien is not garnished. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006555", "pair_id": "u006555-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006555-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "e320c70a3a7e9115", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006555-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is bankrupt. Bastien is not underwritten. Tomas is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is garnished provided that it is bankrupt. Section 2: a borrower is not indebted provided that it is underwritten. Section 3: a borrower is not garnished provided that it has an escrow account. Question: Bastien is not garnished. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006555", "pair_id": "u006555-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006555-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "04b6f74b8da66313", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006555-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is bankrupt. Bastien is not underwritten. Tomas is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is not bankrupt: then it is garnished. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is underwritten: then it is not indebted. Policy III. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is not garnished. Question: Is it so that Bastien is not garnished?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006555", "pair_id": "u006555-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006555-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "e320c70a3a7e9115", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006555-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is bankrupt. Bastien is not underwritten. Tomas is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt: then it is garnished. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is underwritten: then it is not indebted. Policy III. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is not garnished. Question: Is it so that Bastien is not garnished?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006555", "pair_id": "u006555-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006555-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "04b6f74b8da66313", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006555-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is bankrupt. Bastien is not underwritten. Tomas is bankrupt.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is not bankrupt, it then is garnished. #2 Each time a borrower is underwritten, it then is not indebted. #3 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then is not garnished. Question: Do the terms above show that Bastien is not garnished?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006555", "pair_id": "u006555-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006555-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "e320c70a3a7e9115", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006555-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is bankrupt. Bastien is not underwritten. Tomas is bankrupt.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then is garnished. #2 Each time a borrower is underwritten, it then is not indebted. #3 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then is not garnished. Question: Do the terms above show that Bastien is not garnished?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006555", "pair_id": "u006555-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006555-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "04b6f74b8da66313", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u006558-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is oversized. Priya is rerouted. Liesel has a delivery window of 41. Quentin is not registered. Ulla is oversized. Quentin is not rerouted. Quentin has a delivery window of 66. Ulla has a delivery window of 31.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is misrouted, then it is not sealed. (2) If a parcel has a delivery window of at most 65, then it is misrouted. (3) If a parcel is rerouted, then it is undeliverable. (4) If a parcel is not rerouted, then it has a barcode. (5) If a parcel is not oversized, then it is fragile. (6) If a parcel has a barcode, then it is sealed. Question: Is it true that Quentin is sealed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006558", "pair_id": "u006558-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006558-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "cdbfe57128a934de", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006558-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is oversized. Priya is rerouted. Liesel has a delivery window of 41. Quentin is not registered. Ulla is oversized. Quentin is not rerouted. Quentin has a delivery window of 66. Ulla has a delivery window of 31.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is misrouted, then it is not sealed. (2) If a parcel has a delivery window of at most 65, then it is misrouted. (3) If a parcel is rerouted, then it is undeliverable. (4) If a parcel is rerouted, then it has a barcode. (5) If a parcel is not oversized, then it is fragile. (6) If a parcel has a barcode, then it is sealed. Question: Is it true that Quentin is sealed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006558", "pair_id": "u006558-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006558-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "897e0d66a8812d81", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006586-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Greta is creditworthy. Greta is underwritten. Greta is audited. Anouk is creditworthy. Anouk is not audited. Greta is not overdrawn. Greta is not bankrupt. Greta is not a homeowner. Greta has no mortgage. Anouk is overdrawn. Anouk is not bankrupt. Anouk has no escrow account.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is creditworthy, it then is employed. #2 Each time a borrower is creditworthy and additionally is not overdrawn and additionally is a homeowner, it then is garnished. #3 Each time a borrower is creditworthy and additionally is not a homeowner and additionally is underwritten, it then has a cosigner. #4 Each time a borrower is creditworthy and additionally is overdrawn and additionally has a mortgage, it then is prequalified. #5 Each time a borrower is bankrupt and additionally has an escrow account, it then has a lien. #6 Each time a borrower is audited, it then has no collateral. #7 Each time a borrower is creditworthy and additionally is a homeowner, it then is refinanced. #8 Each time a borrower is creditworthy and additionally is not audited and additionally is not underwritten, it then is a depositor. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Greta?", "options": ["is refinanced", "is garnished", "has a cosigner", "is prequalified", "is a depositor"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a cosigner", "unit_id": "u006586", "pair_id": "u006586-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006586-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "09cf620f330799cf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a6", "a11", "a4", "a5"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u006586-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Greta is creditworthy. Greta is underwritten. Greta is not audited. Anouk is creditworthy. Anouk is not audited. Greta is not overdrawn. Greta is not bankrupt. Greta is not a homeowner. Greta has no mortgage. Anouk is overdrawn. Anouk is not bankrupt. Anouk has no escrow account.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is creditworthy, it then is employed. #2 Each time a borrower is creditworthy and additionally is not overdrawn and additionally is a homeowner, it then is garnished. #3 Each time a borrower is creditworthy and additionally is not a homeowner and additionally is underwritten, it then has a cosigner. #4 Each time a borrower is creditworthy and additionally is overdrawn and additionally has a mortgage, it then is prequalified. #5 Each time a borrower is bankrupt and additionally has an escrow account, it then has a lien. #6 Each time a borrower is audited, it then has no collateral. #7 Each time a borrower is creditworthy and additionally is a homeowner, it then is refinanced. #8 Each time a borrower is creditworthy and additionally is not audited and additionally is not underwritten, it then is a depositor. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Greta?", "options": ["is refinanced", "is garnished", "has a cosigner", "is prequalified", "is a depositor"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a cosigner", "unit_id": "u006586", "pair_id": "u006586-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006586-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "ea72e7e41f52578e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a6", "a11", "a4", "a5"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u006615-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif is not allergic. Elif is not referred. Elif is not rescheduled. Elif is pregnant.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is postoperative, it thereby is not discharged. Point B. If said patient is referred, it thereby is diabetic. Point C. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby is not asthmatic. Point D. If said patient is not discharged, it thereby is not ambulatory. Point E. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is not hypertensive. Point F. If said patient is not anemic, it thereby is ambulatory. Point G. If said patient is not symptomatic, it thereby is not anemic. Point H. If said patient is not allergic, it thereby is not postoperative. Point I. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is not symptomatic. Question: Statement: Elif is not ambulatory. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006615", "pair_id": "u006615-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006615-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "c7f95240b3957de1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006615-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif is not allergic. Elif is not referred. Elif is not rescheduled. Elif is pregnant.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is not postoperative, it thereby is not discharged. Point B. If said patient is referred, it thereby is diabetic. Point C. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby is not asthmatic. Point D. If said patient is not discharged, it thereby is not ambulatory. Point E. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is not hypertensive. Point F. If said patient is not anemic, it thereby is ambulatory. Point G. If said patient is not symptomatic, it thereby is not anemic. Point H. If said patient is not allergic, it thereby is not postoperative. Point I. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is not symptomatic. Question: Statement: Elif is not ambulatory. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006615", "pair_id": "u006615-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006615-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "56f10e491ed014b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006673-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra has a memory allotment of 15. Halcyon is not containerized. Tundra is not containerized. Nimbus has a memory allotment of 73. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 71.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload has a memory allotment of at least 64, then it has a dedicated host. (2) If a workload is containerized, then it is not provisioned. (3) If a workload has a GPU, then it has no dedicated host. (4) If a workload is containerized, then it is autoscaled. Question: Is it true that Tundra has no dedicated host?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006673", "pair_id": "u006673-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006673-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "85650e4eae6a6768", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006673-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra has a memory allotment of 15. Halcyon is not containerized. Tundra is not containerized. Nimbus has a memory allotment of 73. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 71.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload has a memory allotment below 64, then it has a dedicated host. (2) If a workload is containerized, then it is not provisioned. (3) If a workload has a GPU, then it has no dedicated host. (4) If a workload is containerized, then it is autoscaled. Question: Is it true that Tundra has no dedicated host?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006673", "pair_id": "u006673-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006673-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "431ccdf7abf7c5ea", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006673-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra has a memory allotment of 15. Halcyon is not containerized. Tundra is not containerized. Nimbus has a memory allotment of 73. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 71.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload has a memory allotment of 64 or more, it also has a dedicated host. Clause 2: once any workload is containerized, it also is not provisioned. Clause 3: once any workload has a GPU, it also has no dedicated host. Clause 4: once any workload is containerized, it also is autoscaled. Question: Does it follow that Tundra has no dedicated host?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006673", "pair_id": "u006673-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006673-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "85650e4eae6a6768", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006673-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra has a memory allotment of 15. Halcyon is not containerized. Tundra is not containerized. Nimbus has a memory allotment of 73. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 71.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload has a memory allotment under 64, it also has a dedicated host. Clause 2: once any workload is containerized, it also is not provisioned. Clause 3: once any workload has a GPU, it also has no dedicated host. Clause 4: once any workload is containerized, it also is autoscaled. Question: Does it follow that Tundra has no dedicated host?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006673", "pair_id": "u006673-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006673-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "431ccdf7abf7c5ea", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006673-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra has a memory allotment of 15. Halcyon is not containerized. Tundra is not containerized. Nimbus has a memory allotment of 73. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 71.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload has a memory allotment of no less than 64, that workload has a dedicated host. Item B. When the workload is containerized, that workload is not provisioned. Item C. When the workload has a GPU, that workload has no dedicated host. Item D. When the workload is containerized, that workload is autoscaled. Question: Can one infer that Tundra has no dedicated host?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006673", "pair_id": "u006673-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006673-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "85650e4eae6a6768", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006673-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra has a memory allotment of 15. Halcyon is not containerized. Tundra is not containerized. Nimbus has a memory allotment of 73. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 71.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload has a memory allotment of less than 64, that workload has a dedicated host. Item B. When the workload is containerized, that workload is not provisioned. Item C. When the workload has a GPU, that workload has no dedicated host. Item D. When the workload is containerized, that workload is autoscaled. Question: Can one infer that Tundra has no dedicated host?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006673", "pair_id": "u006673-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006673-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "431ccdf7abf7c5ea", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006681-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel has no caregiver. Xenia has no caregiver. Wendel is not hypertensive. Wendel has a pain level of 67. Wendel has a pulse rate of 12. Xenia has a pulse rate of 42.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is not hypertensive, it thereby is not referred. Point B. If said patient is not hypertensive, it thereby is referred. Point C. If said patient has a pain level short of 11, it thereby is admitted. Point D. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby is bedridden. Point E. If said patient has a pulse rate short of 60, it thereby is not bedridden. Point E supersedes Point D. Point A supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Wendel is referred. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006681", "pair_id": "u006681-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006681-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fc69014bf97157d6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006681-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel has no caregiver. Xenia has no caregiver. Wendel is not hypertensive. Wendel has a pain level of 67. Wendel has a pulse rate of 12. Xenia has a pulse rate of 42.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is hypertensive, it thereby is not referred. Point B. If said patient is not hypertensive, it thereby is referred. Point C. If said patient has a pain level short of 11, it thereby is admitted. Point D. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby is bedridden. Point E. If said patient has a pulse rate short of 60, it thereby is not bedridden. Point E supersedes Point D. Point A supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Wendel is referred. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006681", "pair_id": "u006681-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006681-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3c74c1c952f4532e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006692-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is a veteran. Noor is not relocating. Jasna is eligible. Jasna is a graduate. Rune is recommended. Noor is not probationary. Jasna is not relocating. Jasna has no portfolio. Jasna has no signing bonus. Rune is probationary. Noor has no portfolio. Rune is a graduate. Noor is a graduate. Rune has no signing bonus. Jasna is recommended. Rune is a veteran. Noor is not recommended.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is not licensed: then it has a background screening. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is a veteran: then it is onboarded. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus has a portfolio plus is not headhunted: then it has a mentor. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is eligible plus has a signing bonus: then it is not headhunted. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has no signing bonus plus is relocating plus is probationary: then it has no background screening. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is not recommended: then it is not licensed. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus has no portfolio plus is a graduate: then it has no mentor. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy VII. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy V. Question: Is it so that Jasna has a mentor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006692", "pair_id": "u006692-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006692-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d2c9aedb2f407bcd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u006692-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is a veteran. Noor is not relocating. Jasna is eligible. Jasna is a graduate. Rune is recommended. Noor is not probationary. Jasna is not relocating. Jasna has no portfolio. Jasna has no signing bonus. Rune is probationary. Noor has no portfolio. Rune is a graduate. Noor is a graduate. Rune has no signing bonus. Jasna is recommended. Rune is a veteran. Noor is not recommended.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is not licensed: then it has a background screening. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is a veteran: then it is onboarded. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus has a portfolio plus is not headhunted: then it has a mentor. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is eligible plus has a signing bonus: then it is not headhunted. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has no signing bonus plus is relocating plus is probationary: then it has no background screening. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is recommended: then it is not licensed. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus has no portfolio plus is a graduate: then it has no mentor. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy VII. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy V. Question: Is it so that Jasna has a mentor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006692", "pair_id": "u006692-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006692-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2bc6fd2b6e77b289", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u006692-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is a veteran. Noor is not relocating. Jasna is eligible. Jasna is a graduate. Rune is recommended. Noor is not probationary. Jasna is not relocating. Jasna has no portfolio. Jasna has no signing bonus. Rune is probationary. Noor has no portfolio. Rune is a graduate. Noor is a graduate. Rune has no signing bonus. Jasna is recommended. Rune is a veteran. Noor is not recommended.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is not licensed, it then has a background screening. #2 Each time a candidate is a veteran, it then is onboarded. #3 Each time a candidate has a background screening and additionally has a portfolio and additionally is not headhunted, it then has a mentor. #4 Each time a candidate is eligible and additionally has a signing bonus, it then is not headhunted. #5 Each time a candidate has no signing bonus and additionally is relocating and additionally is probationary, it then has no background screening. #6 Each time a candidate is not recommended, it then is not licensed. #7 Each time a candidate has a background screening and additionally has no portfolio and additionally is a graduate, it then has no mentor. #7 yields to #3. #5 yields to #1. Question: Do the terms above show that Jasna has a mentor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006692", "pair_id": "u006692-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006692-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d2c9aedb2f407bcd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u006692-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is a veteran. Noor is not relocating. Jasna is eligible. Jasna is a graduate. Rune is recommended. Noor is not probationary. Jasna is not relocating. Jasna has no portfolio. Jasna has no signing bonus. Rune is probationary. Noor has no portfolio. Rune is a graduate. Noor is a graduate. Rune has no signing bonus. Jasna is recommended. Rune is a veteran. Noor is not recommended.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is not licensed, it then has a background screening. #2 Each time a candidate is a veteran, it then is onboarded. #3 Each time a candidate has a background screening and additionally has a portfolio and additionally is not headhunted, it then has a mentor. #4 Each time a candidate is eligible and additionally has a signing bonus, it then is not headhunted. #5 Each time a candidate has no signing bonus and additionally is relocating and additionally is probationary, it then has no background screening. #6 Each time a candidate is recommended, it then is not licensed. #7 Each time a candidate has a background screening and additionally has no portfolio and additionally is a graduate, it then has no mentor. #7 yields to #3. #5 yields to #1. Question: Do the terms above show that Jasna has a mentor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006692", "pair_id": "u006692-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006692-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2bc6fd2b6e77b289", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u006713-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has no snapshot. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr is not mirrored.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is mirrored, thus it is replicated. Provision 2: when the workload here has a failover node, thus it has a GPU. Provision 3: when the workload here has a failover node, thus it has no GPU. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here has a failover node. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here has no failover node. Provision 2 has no effect when the workload here is idle. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here has a snapshot. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here is not idle. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Zephyr has a GPU?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006713", "pair_id": "u006713-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006713-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cc5a099043bd7786", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006713-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a failover node. Zephyr has no snapshot. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr is not mirrored.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is mirrored, thus it is replicated. Provision 2: when the workload here has a failover node, thus it has a GPU. Provision 3: when the workload here has a failover node, thus it has no GPU. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here has a failover node. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here has no failover node. Provision 2 has no effect when the workload here is idle. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here has a snapshot. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here is not idle. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Zephyr has a GPU?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006713", "pair_id": "u006713-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006713-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "62df38ee65228fac", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006713-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has no snapshot. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr is not mirrored.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is mirrored, it thereby is replicated. Point B. If said workload has a failover node, it thereby has a GPU. Point C. If said workload has a failover node, it thereby has no GPU. Point A is cancelled if said workload has a failover node. Point C is cancelled if said workload has no failover node. Point B is cancelled if said workload is idle. Point C is cancelled if said workload has a snapshot. Point C is cancelled if said workload is not idle. Point C supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Zephyr has a GPU. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006713", "pair_id": "u006713-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006713-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cc5a099043bd7786", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006713-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a failover node. Zephyr has no snapshot. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr is not mirrored.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is mirrored, it thereby is replicated. Point B. If said workload has a failover node, it thereby has a GPU. Point C. If said workload has a failover node, it thereby has no GPU. Point A is cancelled if said workload has a failover node. Point C is cancelled if said workload has no failover node. Point B is cancelled if said workload is idle. Point C is cancelled if said workload has a snapshot. Point C is cancelled if said workload is not idle. Point C supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Zephyr has a GPU. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006713", "pair_id": "u006713-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006713-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "62df38ee65228fac", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006713-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has no snapshot. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr is not mirrored.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is mirrored, so it is replicated. No. 2 While the given workload has a failover node, so it has a GPU. No. 3 While the given workload has a failover node, so it has no GPU. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload has a failover node. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload has no failover node. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given workload is idle. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload has a snapshot. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload is not idle. No. 3 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Zephyr has a GPU\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006713", "pair_id": "u006713-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006713-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cc5a099043bd7786", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006713-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a failover node. Zephyr has no snapshot. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr is not mirrored.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is mirrored, so it is replicated. No. 2 While the given workload has a failover node, so it has a GPU. No. 3 While the given workload has a failover node, so it has no GPU. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload has a failover node. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload has no failover node. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given workload is idle. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload has a snapshot. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload is not idle. No. 3 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Zephyr has a GPU\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006713", "pair_id": "u006713-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006713-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "62df38ee65228fac", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006754-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kalle is not relocating. Kalle is not a graduate. Kalle has no diploma. Petra is not licensed. Olek has no visa. Petra has a seniority step of 4. Ivo is a graduate. Petra is relocating. Kalle has no visa. Petra has a commute radius of 27. Kalle is not licensed. Kalle has a commute radius of 25.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is not relocating, thus it is not sponsored. Provision 2: when the candidate here is a graduate, thus it is recommended. Provision 3: when the candidate here has a visa, thus it has no background screening. Provision 4: when the candidate here has a visa, thus it is seasoned. Provision 5: when the candidate here has a seniority step at or above 31, thus it is probationary. Provision 6: when the candidate here has a seniority step beneath 31, thus it is sponsored. Provision 7: when the candidate here is not onboarded, thus it is certified. Provision 8: when the candidate here has no mentor, thus it has a background screening. Provision 9: when the candidate here has a commute radius at or above 24, thus it is bonded. Provision 10: when the candidate here is not licensed, thus it is interviewed. Provision 11: when the candidate here has a diploma, thus it is bilingual. Provision 9 has no effect when the candidate here is not licensed. Provision 11 has no effect when the candidate here is not onboarded. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Which one describes Kalle?", "options": ["is bonded", "is certified", "is bilingual", "is seasoned", "has a background screening", "is sponsored", "is probationary", "is interviewed"], "target": 7, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is interviewed", "unit_id": "u006754", "pair_id": "u006754-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006754-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cd42b898220276c4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a6", "a13", "a1", "a14", "a7", "a17", "a8"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u006754-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kalle is not relocating. Kalle is not a graduate. Kalle has no diploma. Petra is not licensed. Olek has no visa. Petra has a seniority step of 4. Ivo is a graduate. Petra is relocating. Kalle has no visa. Petra has a commute radius of 27. Kalle is licensed. Kalle has a commute radius of 25.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is not relocating, thus it is not sponsored. Provision 2: when the candidate here is a graduate, thus it is recommended. Provision 3: when the candidate here has a visa, thus it has no background screening. Provision 4: when the candidate here has a visa, thus it is seasoned. Provision 5: when the candidate here has a seniority step at or above 31, thus it is probationary. Provision 6: when the candidate here has a seniority step beneath 31, thus it is sponsored. Provision 7: when the candidate here is not onboarded, thus it is certified. Provision 8: when the candidate here has no mentor, thus it has a background screening. Provision 9: when the candidate here has a commute radius at or above 24, thus it is bonded. Provision 10: when the candidate here is not licensed, thus it is interviewed. Provision 11: when the candidate here has a diploma, thus it is bilingual. Provision 9 has no effect when the candidate here is not licensed. Provision 11 has no effect when the candidate here is not onboarded. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Which one describes Kalle?", "options": ["is bonded", "is certified", "is bilingual", "is seasoned", "has a background screening", "is sponsored", "is probationary", "is interviewed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bonded", "unit_id": "u006754", "pair_id": "u006754-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006754-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "18977894ba4cb332", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a6", "a13", "a1", "a14", "a7", "a17", "a8"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u006754-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kalle is not relocating. Kalle is not a graduate. Kalle has no diploma. Petra is not licensed. Olek has no visa. Petra has a seniority step of 4. Ivo is a graduate. Petra is relocating. Kalle has no visa. Petra has a commute radius of 27. Kalle is not licensed. Kalle has a commute radius of 25.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is not relocating, it thereby is not sponsored. Point B. If said candidate is a graduate, it thereby is recommended. Point C. If said candidate has a visa, it thereby has no background screening. Point D. If said candidate has a visa, it thereby is seasoned. Point E. If said candidate has a seniority step of minimum 31, it thereby is probationary. Point F. If said candidate has a seniority step short of 31, it thereby is sponsored. Point G. If said candidate is not onboarded, it thereby is certified. Point H. If said candidate has no mentor, it thereby has a background screening. Point I. If said candidate has a commute radius of minimum 24, it thereby is bonded. Point J. If said candidate is not licensed, it thereby is interviewed. Point K. If said candidate has a diploma, it thereby is bilingual. Point I is cancelled if said candidate is not licensed. Point K is cancelled if said candidate is not onboarded. Point C supersedes Point H. Point F supersedes Point A. Question: Which choice is true for Kalle?", "options": ["is bonded", "is certified", "is bilingual", "is seasoned", "has a background screening", "is sponsored", "is probationary", "is interviewed"], "target": 7, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is interviewed", "unit_id": "u006754", "pair_id": "u006754-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006754-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cd42b898220276c4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a6", "a13", "a1", "a14", "a7", "a17", "a8"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u006754-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kalle is not relocating. Kalle is not a graduate. Kalle has no diploma. Petra is not licensed. Olek has no visa. Petra has a seniority step of 4. Ivo is a graduate. Petra is relocating. Kalle has no visa. Petra has a commute radius of 27. Kalle is licensed. Kalle has a commute radius of 25.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is not relocating, it thereby is not sponsored. Point B. If said candidate is a graduate, it thereby is recommended. Point C. If said candidate has a visa, it thereby has no background screening. Point D. If said candidate has a visa, it thereby is seasoned. Point E. If said candidate has a seniority step of minimum 31, it thereby is probationary. Point F. If said candidate has a seniority step short of 31, it thereby is sponsored. Point G. If said candidate is not onboarded, it thereby is certified. Point H. If said candidate has no mentor, it thereby has a background screening. Point I. If said candidate has a commute radius of minimum 24, it thereby is bonded. Point J. If said candidate is not licensed, it thereby is interviewed. Point K. If said candidate has a diploma, it thereby is bilingual. Point I is cancelled if said candidate is not licensed. Point K is cancelled if said candidate is not onboarded. Point C supersedes Point H. Point F supersedes Point A. Question: Which choice is true for Kalle?", "options": ["is bonded", "is certified", "is bilingual", "is seasoned", "has a background screening", "is sponsored", "is probationary", "is interviewed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bonded", "unit_id": "u006754", "pair_id": "u006754-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006754-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "18977894ba4cb332", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a6", "a13", "a1", "a14", "a7", "a17", "a8"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u006774-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar has a migration script. Feldspar is reproducible. Obsidian has no migration script. Obsidian is tested. Obsidian is signed. Obsidian is reproducible.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is tested and likewise is signed, so it is tagged. No. 2 While the given build is tested and likewise is signed and likewise is reproducible, so it is not tagged. No. 3 While the given build has a migration script, so it is profiled. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Obsidian is tagged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006774", "pair_id": "u006774-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006774-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d7a1b2b6a1a03212", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u006774-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar has a migration script. Feldspar is reproducible. Obsidian has no migration script. Feldspar is signed. Obsidian is tested. Obsidian is signed. Obsidian is reproducible.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is tested and likewise is signed, so it is tagged. No. 2 While the given build is tested and likewise is signed and likewise is reproducible, so it is not tagged. No. 3 While the given build has a migration script, so it is profiled. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Obsidian is tagged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u006774", "pair_id": "u006774-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006774-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "233918d9b83bc9fb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u006796-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is discharged.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is not symptomatic, thus it is bedridden. Provision 2: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is pregnant. Provision 3: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is postoperative. Question: Would it be right to say that Vilja is discharged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006796", "pair_id": "u006796-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006796-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "e3d421c1daf98f44", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006796-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is discharged. Vilja is symptomatic.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is not symptomatic, thus it is bedridden. Provision 2: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is pregnant. Provision 3: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is postoperative. Question: Would it be right to say that Vilja is discharged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006796", "pair_id": "u006796-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006796-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "455f0c46d24c3acb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006796-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is discharged.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is not symptomatic, it thereby is bedridden. Point B. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby is pregnant. Point C. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby is postoperative. Question: Statement: Vilja is discharged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006796", "pair_id": "u006796-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006796-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "e3d421c1daf98f44", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006796-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is discharged. Vilja is symptomatic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is not symptomatic, it thereby is bedridden. Point B. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby is pregnant. Point C. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby is postoperative. Question: Statement: Vilja is discharged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006796", "pair_id": "u006796-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006796-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "455f0c46d24c3acb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006796-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is discharged.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is not symptomatic, so it is bedridden. No. 2 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is pregnant. No. 3 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is postoperative. Question: Is the claim \"Vilja is discharged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006796", "pair_id": "u006796-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006796-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "e3d421c1daf98f44", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006796-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is discharged. Vilja is symptomatic.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is not symptomatic, so it is bedridden. No. 2 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is pregnant. No. 3 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is postoperative. Question: Is the claim \"Vilja is discharged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u006796", "pair_id": "u006796-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006796-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "455f0c46d24c3acb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006844-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Florin is symptomatic. Vilja has a mobility rank of 92. Vilja has a chaperone. Zora has a fever reading of 24. Vilja is symptomatic. Zora has no interpreter. Florin has a pain level of 6. Vilja is not postoperative. Vilja has a fever reading of 14. Florin is postoperative. Vilja has a pain level of 62. Zora is not diabetic. Vilja has an interpreter. Zora has a chaperone.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is vaccinated while has a pain level beneath 72 while is postoperative, thus it has a pacemaker. Provision 2: when the patient here is vaccinated while has a mobility rank at or below 72 while is discharged, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 3: when the patient here is vaccinated while has a pain level at or above 72, thus it is ambulatory. Provision 4: when the patient here has a fever reading beneath 53, thus it is pregnant. Provision 5: when the patient here is symptomatic while has a chaperone, thus it is contagious. Provision 6: when the patient here has a pain level beneath 62, thus it is discharged. Provision 7: when the patient here is vaccinated while has a mobility rank beyond 72 while is pregnant, thus it is fasting. Provision 8: when the patient here has an interpreter, thus it is vaccinated. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here is diabetic. Question: Which one describes Vilja?", "options": ["is hypertensive", "is fasting", "has a pacemaker", "is ambulatory"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is fasting", "unit_id": "u006844", "pair_id": "u006844-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006844-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a2b9d08bf9d78dba", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a2", "a7", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006844-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Florin is symptomatic. Vilja has a mobility rank of 92. Vilja has a chaperone. Zora has a fever reading of 24. Vilja is symptomatic. Zora has no interpreter. Florin has a pain level of 6. Vilja is not postoperative. Vilja has a fever reading of 14. Florin is postoperative. Vilja has a pain level of 26. Zora is not diabetic. Vilja has an interpreter. Zora has a chaperone.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is vaccinated while has a pain level beneath 72 while is postoperative, thus it has a pacemaker. Provision 2: when the patient here is vaccinated while has a mobility rank at or below 72 while is discharged, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 3: when the patient here is vaccinated while has a pain level at or above 72, thus it is ambulatory. Provision 4: when the patient here has a fever reading beneath 53, thus it is pregnant. Provision 5: when the patient here is symptomatic while has a chaperone, thus it is contagious. Provision 6: when the patient here has a pain level beneath 62, thus it is discharged. Provision 7: when the patient here is vaccinated while has a mobility rank beyond 72 while is pregnant, thus it is fasting. Provision 8: when the patient here has an interpreter, thus it is vaccinated. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here is diabetic. Question: Which one describes Vilja?", "options": ["is hypertensive", "is fasting", "has a pacemaker", "is ambulatory"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is fasting", "unit_id": "u006844", "pair_id": "u006844-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006844-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f08eab9975914a6d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a2", "a7", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006866-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale has a defect tally of 24. Galena has a defect tally of 57. Galena is not versioned. Shale is versioned.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a defect tally beneath 57, thus it is compiled. Provision 2: when the build here is versioned, thus it is reproducible. Provision 3: when the build here has a defect tally at or above 11, thus it is signed. Provision 4: when the build here has a migration script, thus it has a changelog. Provision 5: when the build here has a defect tally beneath 11, thus it has a migration script. Question: Which one describes Galena?", "options": ["is signed", "has a migration script"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is signed", "unit_id": "u006866", "pair_id": "u006866-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006866-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "c6878aa8b473669b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a1", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006866-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale has a defect tally of 24. Galena has a defect tally of 25. Galena is not versioned. Shale is versioned.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a defect tally beneath 57, thus it is compiled. Provision 2: when the build here is versioned, thus it is reproducible. Provision 3: when the build here has a defect tally at or above 11, thus it is signed. Provision 4: when the build here has a migration script, thus it has a changelog. Provision 5: when the build here has a defect tally beneath 11, thus it has a migration script. Question: Which one describes Galena?", "options": ["is signed", "has a migration script"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is signed", "unit_id": "u006866", "pair_id": "u006866-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006866-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "c14c45133fa6c29e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a1", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006923-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek has a pulse rate of 16. Florin has a pulse rate of 72. Dorian has a fever reading of 64. Benedek has a fever reading of 33. Florin has a fever reading of 19. Benedek is diabetic. Dorian has a pulse rate of 45.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has a pulse rate of 25 or above, it then is referred. #2 Each time a patient is referred, it then is allergic. #3 Each time a patient is not vaccinated, it then is bedridden. #4 Each time a patient has a pulse rate less than 25, it then is not vaccinated. #5 Each time a patient has a pulse rate greater than 29, it then is sedated. #6 Each time a patient has a fever reading of 60 or above, it then is not symptomatic. #7 Each time a patient is not diabetic, it then is contagious. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Benedek?", "options": ["is allergic", "is bedridden"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is bedridden", "unit_id": "u006923", "pair_id": "u006923-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006923-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5921cbaa0ed5a7c8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a6"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006923-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek has a pulse rate of 16. Florin has a pulse rate of 72. Dorian has a fever reading of 64. Benedek has a fever reading of 96. Florin has a fever reading of 19. Benedek is diabetic. Dorian has a pulse rate of 45.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has a pulse rate of 25 or above, it then is referred. #2 Each time a patient is referred, it then is allergic. #3 Each time a patient is not vaccinated, it then is bedridden. #4 Each time a patient has a pulse rate less than 25, it then is not vaccinated. #5 Each time a patient has a pulse rate greater than 29, it then is sedated. #6 Each time a patient has a fever reading of 60 or above, it then is not symptomatic. #7 Each time a patient is not diabetic, it then is contagious. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Benedek?", "options": ["is allergic", "is bedridden"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is bedridden", "unit_id": "u006923", "pair_id": "u006923-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006923-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "01ec644bf5e108f7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a6"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u006929-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk has a mortgage. Anouk is underwritten. Anouk is audited. Anouk has a repayment grade of 34. Anouk is vetted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has a lien while has a repayment grade beyond 24, thus it is refinanced. Provision 2: when the borrower here has a lien while has a credit rating at or above 16 while has a repayment grade beyond 86, thus it is garnished. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a lien while is underwritten while is audited, thus it has collateral. Provision 4: when the borrower here is creditworthy while is foreclosed, thus it is not pensioned. Provision 5: when the borrower here has a risk tier at or above 29, thus it is not bankrupt. Provision 6: when the borrower here is bankrupt, thus it has a lien. Provision 7: when the borrower here is foreclosed, thus it is overdrawn. Provision 8: when the borrower here is vetted, thus it is not overdrawn. Provision 9: when the borrower here has a mortgage while is vetted, thus it is bankrupt. Provision 10: when the borrower here has a repayment grade beyond 31, thus it is indebted. Provision 1 has no effect when the borrower here is underwritten. Provision 10 has no effect when the borrower here has a risk tier beyond 36. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Which one describes Anouk?", "options": ["is garnished", "is refinanced", "has collateral"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u006929", "pair_id": "u006929-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006929-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e4e167281545743a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a9", "a8"]}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u006929-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk has a mortgage. Anouk is underwritten. Anouk is foreclosed. Anouk is audited. Anouk has a repayment grade of 34. Anouk is vetted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has a lien while has a repayment grade beyond 24, thus it is refinanced. Provision 2: when the borrower here has a lien while has a credit rating at or above 16 while has a repayment grade beyond 86, thus it is garnished. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a lien while is underwritten while is audited, thus it has collateral. Provision 4: when the borrower here is creditworthy while is foreclosed, thus it is not pensioned. Provision 5: when the borrower here has a risk tier at or above 29, thus it is not bankrupt. Provision 6: when the borrower here is bankrupt, thus it has a lien. Provision 7: when the borrower here is foreclosed, thus it is overdrawn. Provision 8: when the borrower here is vetted, thus it is not overdrawn. Provision 9: when the borrower here has a mortgage while is vetted, thus it is bankrupt. Provision 10: when the borrower here has a repayment grade beyond 31, thus it is indebted. Provision 1 has no effect when the borrower here is underwritten. Provision 10 has no effect when the borrower here has a risk tier beyond 36. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Which one describes Anouk?", "options": ["is garnished", "is refinanced", "has collateral"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u006929", "pair_id": "u006929-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006929-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f72b94b314381d83", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a9", "a8"]}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u006952-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is profiled. Pumice is not documented. Quartz has a defect tally of 33. Pumice is tested. Quartz is not tested. Pumice is signed. Pumice has no security advisory. Pumice has a defect tally of 88.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is signed and likewise has a defect tally that falls below 60, so it has a migration script. No. 2 While the given build is profiled, so it is merged. No. 3 While the given build is signed and likewise has a defect tally not below 89 and likewise is documented, so it has no migration script. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build has a security advisory and likewise is tested. No. 1 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Pumice has a migration script\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006952", "pair_id": "u006952-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006952-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d89049f5ba6eb76f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u006952-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is profiled. Pumice is not documented. Quartz has a defect tally of 33. Pumice is tested. Quartz is not tested. Pumice is signed. Pumice has no security advisory. Pumice has a defect tally of 88.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is signed and likewise has a defect tally that falls below 60, so it has a migration script. No. 2 While the given build is profiled, so it is merged. No. 3 While the given build is signed and likewise has a defect tally not below 60 and likewise is documented, so it has no migration script. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build has a security advisory and likewise is tested. No. 1 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Pumice has a migration script\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006952", "pair_id": "u006952-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006952-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "74ca0f03d5c9c63b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u006971-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has no premium discount. Celeste is not a claimant. Wanda has no roadside assistance. Fabian is not a claimant. Wanda is a smoker. Celeste has no deductible waiver. Celeste is not grandfathered. Fabian is a smoker. Wanda is disputed. Una is a claimant. Celeste has no rider. Wanda is not litigated. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Una is appraised. Fabian is appraised. Fabian has no dashcam. Wanda is not grandfathered. Fabian is litigated. Una is a smoker. Una has no dashcam. Una is litigated. Una has roadside assistance. Wanda has a premium discount. Wanda is not inspected. Una is disputed. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Fabian has no rider. Wanda has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is subrogated provided that it has a beneficiary as well as is a smoker as well as has a dashcam. Section 2: a policyholder is bundled provided that it is grandfathered as well as is appraised as well as is litigated. Section 3: a policyholder is lapsed provided that it has a deductible waiver. Section 4: a policyholder is retired provided that it has a beneficiary as well as is a claimant as well as has a dashcam. Section 5: a policyholder has a beneficiary provided that it is disputed as well as has a premium discount. Section 6: a policyholder is uninsurable provided that it has a beneficiary as well as has a rider as well as is a smoker. Section 7: a policyholder is not reinstated provided that it is retired as well as has roadside assistance. Section 7 lapses for a policyholder if it has roadside assistance. Section 1 lapses for a policyholder if it is a claimant. Section 3 lapses for a policyholder if it is inspected. Question: Which statement fits Wanda?", "options": ["is retired", "is uninsurable", "is subrogated"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is subrogated", "unit_id": "u006971", "pair_id": "u006971-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006971-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7cf4f58e1337ace9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a6", "a16"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u006971-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has no premium discount. Celeste is not a claimant. Wanda has no roadside assistance. Fabian is not a claimant. Wanda is a smoker. Celeste has no deductible waiver. Celeste is not grandfathered. Fabian is a smoker. Wanda is a claimant. Wanda is disputed. Una is a claimant. Celeste has no rider. Wanda is not litigated. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Una is appraised. Fabian is appraised. Fabian has no dashcam. Wanda is not grandfathered. Fabian is litigated. Una is a smoker. Una has no dashcam. Una is litigated. Una has roadside assistance. Wanda has a premium discount. Wanda is not inspected. Una is disputed. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Fabian has no rider. Wanda has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is subrogated provided that it has a beneficiary as well as is a smoker as well as has a dashcam. Section 2: a policyholder is bundled provided that it is grandfathered as well as is appraised as well as is litigated. Section 3: a policyholder is lapsed provided that it has a deductible waiver. Section 4: a policyholder is retired provided that it has a beneficiary as well as is a claimant as well as has a dashcam. Section 5: a policyholder has a beneficiary provided that it is disputed as well as has a premium discount. Section 6: a policyholder is uninsurable provided that it has a beneficiary as well as has a rider as well as is a smoker. Section 7: a policyholder is not reinstated provided that it is retired as well as has roadside assistance. Section 7 lapses for a policyholder if it has roadside assistance. Section 1 lapses for a policyholder if it is a claimant. Section 3 lapses for a policyholder if it is inspected. Question: Which statement fits Wanda?", "options": ["is retired", "is uninsurable", "is subrogated"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u006971", "pair_id": "u006971-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006971-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4268162e69a9e958", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a6", "a16"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u006971-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has no premium discount. Celeste is not a claimant. Wanda has no roadside assistance. Fabian is not a claimant. Wanda is a smoker. Celeste has no deductible waiver. Celeste is not grandfathered. Fabian is a smoker. Wanda is disputed. Una is a claimant. Celeste has no rider. Wanda is not litigated. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Una is appraised. Fabian is appraised. Fabian has no dashcam. Wanda is not grandfathered. Fabian is litigated. Una is a smoker. Una has no dashcam. Una is litigated. Una has roadside assistance. Wanda has a premium discount. Wanda is not inspected. Una is disputed. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Fabian has no rider. Wanda has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has a beneficiary plus is a smoker plus has a dashcam: then it is subrogated. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is grandfathered plus is appraised plus is litigated: then it is bundled. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a deductible waiver: then it is lapsed. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has a beneficiary plus is a claimant plus has a dashcam: then it is retired. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is disputed plus has a premium discount: then it has a beneficiary. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder has a beneficiary plus has a rider plus is a smoker: then it is uninsurable. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder is retired plus has roadside assistance: then it is not reinstated. Policy VII is waived if that policyholder has roadside assistance. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is a claimant. Policy III is waived if that policyholder is inspected. Question: Which choice is right for Wanda?", "options": ["is retired", "is uninsurable", "is subrogated"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is subrogated", "unit_id": "u006971", "pair_id": "u006971-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006971-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7cf4f58e1337ace9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a6", "a16"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u006971-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has no premium discount. Celeste is not a claimant. Wanda has no roadside assistance. Fabian is not a claimant. Wanda is a smoker. Celeste has no deductible waiver. Celeste is not grandfathered. Fabian is a smoker. Wanda is a claimant. Wanda is disputed. Una is a claimant. Celeste has no rider. Wanda is not litigated. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Una is appraised. Fabian is appraised. Fabian has no dashcam. Wanda is not grandfathered. Fabian is litigated. Una is a smoker. Una has no dashcam. Una is litigated. Una has roadside assistance. Wanda has a premium discount. Wanda is not inspected. Una is disputed. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Fabian has no rider. Wanda has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has a beneficiary plus is a smoker plus has a dashcam: then it is subrogated. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is grandfathered plus is appraised plus is litigated: then it is bundled. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a deductible waiver: then it is lapsed. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has a beneficiary plus is a claimant plus has a dashcam: then it is retired. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is disputed plus has a premium discount: then it has a beneficiary. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder has a beneficiary plus has a rider plus is a smoker: then it is uninsurable. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder is retired plus has roadside assistance: then it is not reinstated. Policy VII is waived if that policyholder has roadside assistance. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is a claimant. Policy III is waived if that policyholder is inspected. Question: Which choice is right for Wanda?", "options": ["is retired", "is uninsurable", "is subrogated"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u006971", "pair_id": "u006971-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u006971-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4268162e69a9e958", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a6", "a16"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u006977-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is not unionized. Petra has no visa. Teodor is certified. Teodor has no portfolio. Teodor has no visa. Kalle has a visa. Kalle is not unionized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has no visa, it then is not relocating. #2 Each time a candidate is certified, it then is not fingerprinted. #3 Each time a candidate is headhunted, it then is not probationary. #4 Each time a candidate has a portfolio, it then is headhunted. #5 Each time a candidate has no portfolio, it then is not onboarded. #6 Each time a candidate has a visa, it then is onboarded. #7 Each time a candidate is unionized, it then is fingerprinted. #8 Each time a candidate has no visa, it then is not headhunted. #9 Each time a candidate is headhunted, it then is probationary. #2 is set aside if a candidate is not unionized. #3 is set aside if a candidate has a visa. #3 is set aside if a candidate is unionized. #9 is set aside if a candidate is not unionized. #4 is set aside if a candidate is not bonded. #2 yields to #7. #9 yields to #3. #6 yields to #5. #8 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Teodor is probationary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006977", "pair_id": "u006977-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006977-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "51850365b52e5870", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u006977-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is not unionized. Petra has no visa. Teodor is certified. Teodor has no portfolio. Teodor has no visa. Kalle has a visa. Kalle is not unionized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has a visa, it then is not relocating. #2 Each time a candidate is certified, it then is not fingerprinted. #3 Each time a candidate is headhunted, it then is not probationary. #4 Each time a candidate has a portfolio, it then is headhunted. #5 Each time a candidate has no portfolio, it then is not onboarded. #6 Each time a candidate has a visa, it then is onboarded. #7 Each time a candidate is unionized, it then is fingerprinted. #8 Each time a candidate has no visa, it then is not headhunted. #9 Each time a candidate is headhunted, it then is probationary. #2 is set aside if a candidate is not unionized. #3 is set aside if a candidate has a visa. #3 is set aside if a candidate is unionized. #9 is set aside if a candidate is not unionized. #4 is set aside if a candidate is not bonded. #2 yields to #7. #9 yields to #3. #6 yields to #5. #8 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Teodor is probationary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u006977", "pair_id": "u006977-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u006977-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a5424e109e1e2a72", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007012-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke has no escrow account. Ingrid is not prequalified. Wiebke is not pensioned. Wiebke is a depositor. Wiebke has a lien. Anouk is not pensioned. Anouk is not solvent. Greta is not refinanced. Wiebke is vetted. Greta is vetted. Anouk has no escrow account. Anouk is refinanced. Anouk is not a depositor. Ingrid is refinanced. Greta has no escrow account. Greta is not prequalified. Greta is solvent. Wiebke is not solvent. Anouk is prequalified. Ingrid is a depositor.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is vetted and additionally is solvent and additionally is pensioned, it then is bankrupt. #2 Each time a borrower is prequalified, it then is not bankrupt. #3 Each time a borrower is pensioned and additionally has an escrow account and additionally has a lien, it then is amortized. #4 Each time a borrower is a depositor and additionally has a lien and additionally is solvent, it then has no cosigner. #5 Each time a borrower is not a depositor and additionally is prequalified, it then has a cosigner. #4 is set aside if a borrower is refinanced and additionally is solvent. #3 is set aside if a borrower is solvent. #2 yields to #1. #4 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Anouk has a cosigner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007012", "pair_id": "u007012-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007012-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ba33f68e25668a0d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u007012-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke has no escrow account. Ingrid is not prequalified. Wiebke is not pensioned. Wiebke is a depositor. Wiebke has a lien. Anouk is not pensioned. Anouk is not solvent. Greta is not refinanced. Wiebke is vetted. Greta is vetted. Anouk has no escrow account. Anouk is refinanced. Anouk is not a depositor. Ingrid is refinanced. Greta has no escrow account. Greta is not prequalified. Greta is solvent. Wiebke is not solvent. Anouk is prequalified. Ingrid is a depositor.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is vetted and additionally is solvent and additionally is pensioned, it then is bankrupt. #2 Each time a borrower is prequalified, it then is not bankrupt. #3 Each time a borrower is pensioned and additionally has an escrow account and additionally has a lien, it then is amortized. #4 Each time a borrower is a depositor and additionally has a lien and additionally is solvent, it then has no cosigner. #5 Each time a borrower is a depositor and additionally is prequalified, it then has a cosigner. #4 is set aside if a borrower is refinanced and additionally is solvent. #3 is set aside if a borrower is solvent. #2 yields to #1. #4 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Anouk has a cosigner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007012", "pair_id": "u007012-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007012-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e90d7b93cc2d1da1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u007019-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is rerouted. Quentin has a parcel volume of 70.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it is delayed. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a parcel volume at or above 61, thus it is not fragile. Provision 3: when the parcel here has a parcel volume beneath 70, thus it is fragile. Provision 4: when the parcel here is not rerouted, thus it is sealed. Question: Would it be right to say that Quentin is fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007019", "pair_id": "u007019-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007019-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "345a8474ab9e9980", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007019-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is rerouted. Quentin has a parcel volume of 70.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it is delayed. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a parcel volume at or above 61, thus it is not fragile. Provision 3: when the parcel here has a parcel volume beneath 70, thus it is fragile. Provision 4: when the parcel here is not rerouted, thus it is sealed. Provision 5: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it is consolidated. Question: Would it be right to say that Quentin is fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007019", "pair_id": "u007019-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007019-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "891ca76a5b652d9e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007059-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has no portfolio. Petra is not certified. Noor is not certified. Rune is not eligible. Rune is sponsored. Rune is not certified. Noor is sponsored. Noor has a portfolio.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not relocating provided that it is a graduate. Section 2: a candidate is unionized provided that it has a portfolio. Section 3: a candidate is relocating provided that it is bonded. Section 4: a candidate has a diploma provided that it is sponsored. Section 5: a candidate is bonded provided that it is eligible. Section 6: a candidate is a graduate provided that it is certified. Section 7: a candidate is not freelance provided that it is certified. Question: Rune is relocating. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007059", "pair_id": "u007059-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007059-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "ce792af2dc76166b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007059-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has no portfolio. Petra is not certified. Noor is not certified. Rune is not eligible. Rune is sponsored. Rune is certified. Noor is sponsored. Noor has a portfolio.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not relocating provided that it is a graduate. Section 2: a candidate is unionized provided that it has a portfolio. Section 3: a candidate is relocating provided that it is bonded. Section 4: a candidate has a diploma provided that it is sponsored. Section 5: a candidate is bonded provided that it is eligible. Section 6: a candidate is a graduate provided that it is certified. Section 7: a candidate is not freelance provided that it is certified. Question: Rune is relocating. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007059", "pair_id": "u007059-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007059-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "ffacf713518f7b4f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007062-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora has a chaperone. Xenia is not discharged. Xenia is referred. Xenia has a mobility rank of 67. Xenia is bedridden. Xenia has no chaperone. Zora is discharged.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is contagious, it also is not pregnant. Clause 2: once any patient has a mobility rank over 52, it also has no pacemaker. Clause 3: once any patient has no pacemaker, it also is contagious. Clause 4: once any patient has a mobility rank of 66 or more, it also has no interpreter. Clause 5: once any patient is bedridden, it also is not postoperative. Clause 6: once any patient is contagious, it also is pregnant. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not discharged. Clause 5 does not hold for a patient when any patient has no chaperone. Clause 1 does not hold for a patient when any patient is discharged. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a mobility rank under 54. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not referred. Question: Does it follow that Xenia is pregnant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007062", "pair_id": "u007062-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007062-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "32ec7feb14b630b6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007062-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora has a chaperone. Xenia is not discharged. Xenia is referred. Xenia has a mobility rank of 67. Xenia is bedridden. Xenia has no chaperone. Zora is discharged.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is contagious, it also is not pregnant. Clause 2: once any patient has a mobility rank over 52, it also has no pacemaker. Clause 3: once any patient has no pacemaker, it also is contagious. Clause 4: once any patient has a mobility rank of 78 or more, it also has no interpreter. Clause 5: once any patient is bedridden, it also is not postoperative. Clause 6: once any patient is contagious, it also is pregnant. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not discharged. Clause 5 does not hold for a patient when any patient has no chaperone. Clause 1 does not hold for a patient when any patient is discharged. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a mobility rank under 54. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not referred. Question: Does it follow that Xenia is pregnant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007062", "pair_id": "u007062-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007062-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "72135ab78dd5e5c8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007062-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora has a chaperone. Xenia is not discharged. Xenia is referred. Xenia has a mobility rank of 67. Xenia is bedridden. Xenia has no chaperone. Zora is discharged.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is contagious, that patient is not pregnant. Item B. When the patient has a mobility rank of more than 52, that patient has no pacemaker. Item C. When the patient has no pacemaker, that patient is contagious. Item D. When the patient has a mobility rank of no less than 66, that patient has no interpreter. Item E. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is not postoperative. Item F. When the patient is contagious, that patient is pregnant. Item F is suspended when the patient is not discharged. Item E is suspended when the patient has no chaperone. Item A is suspended when the patient is discharged. Item F is suspended when the patient has a mobility rank of less than 54. Item D is suspended when the patient is not referred. Question: Can one infer that Xenia is pregnant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007062", "pair_id": "u007062-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007062-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "32ec7feb14b630b6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007062-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora has a chaperone. Xenia is not discharged. Xenia is referred. Xenia has a mobility rank of 67. Xenia is bedridden. Xenia has no chaperone. Zora is discharged.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is contagious, that patient is not pregnant. Item B. When the patient has a mobility rank of more than 52, that patient has no pacemaker. Item C. When the patient has no pacemaker, that patient is contagious. Item D. When the patient has a mobility rank of no less than 78, that patient has no interpreter. Item E. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is not postoperative. Item F. When the patient is contagious, that patient is pregnant. Item F is suspended when the patient is not discharged. Item E is suspended when the patient has no chaperone. Item A is suspended when the patient is discharged. Item F is suspended when the patient has a mobility rank of less than 54. Item D is suspended when the patient is not referred. Question: Can one infer that Xenia is pregnant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007062", "pair_id": "u007062-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007062-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "72135ab78dd5e5c8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007065-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse has seed funding. Mirach is cofunded. Betelgeuse is translational. Gemma is multicenter. Betelgeuse is cofunded. Kochab is longitudinal. Betelgeuse has ethics clearance. Gemma has ethics clearance. Kochab has no seed funding. Betelgeuse is not longitudinal. Gemma is longitudinal. Gemma is not cofunded. Kochab is not multicenter.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has no field site provided that it is theoretical. Section 2: a proposal is renewed provided that it is not translational. Section 3: a proposal is not theoretical provided that it has no ethics clearance. Section 4: a proposal has a steering committee provided that it is not multicenter. Section 5: a proposal is theoretical provided that it has ethics clearance. Section 4 lapses for a proposal if it has seed funding. Section 3 lapses for a proposal if it is not cofunded. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it is longitudinal. Section 5 lapses for a proposal if it is cofunded. Section 5 lapses for a proposal if it is not multicenter. Section 3 lapses for a proposal if it is longitudinal. Question: Betelgeuse is theoretical. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007065", "pair_id": "u007065-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007065-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a36bae3bd0184c41", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007065-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse has seed funding. Mirach is cofunded. Betelgeuse is translational. Gemma is multicenter. Betelgeuse is cofunded. Kochab is longitudinal. Betelgeuse has ethics clearance. Gemma has ethics clearance. Kochab has no seed funding. Betelgeuse is not longitudinal. Gemma is longitudinal. Gemma is not cofunded. Kochab is not multicenter.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has no field site provided that it is theoretical. Section 2: a proposal is renewed provided that it is not translational. Section 3: a proposal is not theoretical provided that it has ethics clearance. Section 4: a proposal has a steering committee provided that it is not multicenter. Section 5: a proposal is theoretical provided that it has ethics clearance. Section 4 lapses for a proposal if it has seed funding. Section 3 lapses for a proposal if it is not cofunded. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it is longitudinal. Section 5 lapses for a proposal if it is cofunded. Section 5 lapses for a proposal if it is not multicenter. Section 3 lapses for a proposal if it is longitudinal. Question: Betelgeuse is theoretical. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007065", "pair_id": "u007065-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007065-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0ea2599d50b0acf2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007078-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not deprecated. Tundra is backed up. Sierra has no failover node. Sierra has a dedicated host. Quasar is not provisioned. Tundra is not provisioned. Sierra is provisioned. Tundra has a dedicated host. Sierra has a CPU quota of 81. Quasar has a memory allotment of 76. Tundra has a CPU quota of 99. Quasar is deprecated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a failover node, it thereby has no public endpoint. Point B. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby is not isolated. Point C. If said workload has a dedicated host, it thereby is isolated. Point D. If said workload is deprecated, it thereby is not monitored. Point E. If said workload is backed up, it thereby is monitored. Point F. If said workload has a memory allotment of maximum 15, it thereby is not virtualized. Point G. If said workload is not deprecated, it thereby is virtualized. Point H. If said workload has a CPU quota of minimum 59, it thereby has a public endpoint. Point D supersedes Point E. Point H supersedes Point A. Point F supersedes Point G. Point C supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Sierra is not monitored. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007078", "pair_id": "u007078-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007078-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "875d2660fafb03e0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007078-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not deprecated. Tundra is backed up. Sierra has no failover node. Sierra has a dedicated host. Quasar is not provisioned. Tundra is not provisioned. Sierra is provisioned. Tundra has a dedicated host. Sierra has a CPU quota of 81. Quasar has a memory allotment of 76. Tundra has a CPU quota of 99. Quasar is deprecated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a failover node, it thereby has no public endpoint. Point B. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby is not isolated. Point C. If said workload has a dedicated host, it thereby is isolated. Point D. If said workload is deprecated, it thereby is not monitored. Point E. If said workload is backed up, it thereby is monitored. Point F. If said workload has a memory allotment of maximum 15, it thereby is not virtualized. Point G. If said workload is not deprecated, it thereby is virtualized. Point H. If said workload has a CPU quota short of 59, it thereby has a public endpoint. Point D supersedes Point E. Point H supersedes Point A. Point F supersedes Point G. Point C supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Sierra is not monitored. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007078", "pair_id": "u007078-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007078-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "72ebf7d438d50a80", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007078-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not deprecated. Tundra is backed up. Sierra has no failover node. Sierra has a dedicated host. Quasar is not provisioned. Tundra is not provisioned. Sierra is provisioned. Tundra has a dedicated host. Sierra has a CPU quota of 81. Quasar has a memory allotment of 76. Tundra has a CPU quota of 99. Quasar is deprecated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a failover node, so it has no public endpoint. No. 2 While the given workload is provisioned, so it is not isolated. No. 3 While the given workload has a dedicated host, so it is isolated. No. 4 While the given workload is deprecated, so it is not monitored. No. 5 While the given workload is backed up, so it is monitored. No. 6 While the given workload has a memory allotment not above 15, so it is not virtualized. No. 7 While the given workload is not deprecated, so it is virtualized. No. 8 While the given workload has a CPU quota not below 59, so it has a public endpoint. No. 4 wins over No. 5. No. 8 wins over No. 1. No. 6 wins over No. 7. No. 3 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Sierra is not monitored\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007078", "pair_id": "u007078-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007078-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "875d2660fafb03e0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007078-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not deprecated. Tundra is backed up. Sierra has no failover node. Sierra has a dedicated host. Quasar is not provisioned. Tundra is not provisioned. Sierra is provisioned. Tundra has a dedicated host. Sierra has a CPU quota of 81. Quasar has a memory allotment of 76. Tundra has a CPU quota of 99. Quasar is deprecated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a failover node, so it has no public endpoint. No. 2 While the given workload is provisioned, so it is not isolated. No. 3 While the given workload has a dedicated host, so it is isolated. No. 4 While the given workload is deprecated, so it is not monitored. No. 5 While the given workload is backed up, so it is monitored. No. 6 While the given workload has a memory allotment not above 15, so it is not virtualized. No. 7 While the given workload is not deprecated, so it is virtualized. No. 8 While the given workload has a CPU quota that falls below 59, so it has a public endpoint. No. 4 wins over No. 5. No. 8 wins over No. 1. No. 6 wins over No. 7. No. 3 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Sierra is not monitored\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007078", "pair_id": "u007078-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007078-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "72ebf7d438d50a80", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007079-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is not inspected. Fabian has flood coverage. Zdenek has no flood coverage. Fabian is retired. Bruno is uninsurable. Bruno has flood coverage. Fabian is not uninsurable. Bruno is appraised. Fabian is not inspected. Fabian has a claim frequency of 22. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 38. Zdenek is appraised. Zdenek is uninsurable. Fabian is lapsed. Fabian has no adjuster. Bruno is lapsed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a claim frequency at or below 66, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is lapsed, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beneath 79 while has a claim frequency at or below 21 while has flood coverage, thus it has no premium discount. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has a claim frequency at or below 69 while is appraised, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is a smoker while is uninsurable while has a payout ceiling at or below 25, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beneath 79 while is uninsurable while has an adjuster, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 4 has no effect when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver. Provision 6 has no effect when the policyholder here is inspected while is retired. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Would it be right to say that Fabian has a premium discount?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007079", "pair_id": "u007079-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007079-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d9aa06345034fbd9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007079-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is not inspected. Fabian has flood coverage. Zdenek has no flood coverage. Fabian is retired. Bruno is uninsurable. Bruno has flood coverage. Fabian is not uninsurable. Bruno is appraised. Fabian is not inspected. Fabian has a claim frequency of 22. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 38. Zdenek is appraised. Zdenek is uninsurable. Fabian is lapsed. Fabian has no adjuster. Bruno is lapsed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a claim frequency at or below 66, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is lapsed, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beneath 79 while has a claim frequency at or below 29 while has flood coverage, thus it has no premium discount. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has a claim frequency at or below 69 while is appraised, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is a smoker while is uninsurable while has a payout ceiling at or below 25, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beneath 79 while is uninsurable while has an adjuster, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 4 has no effect when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver. Provision 6 has no effect when the policyholder here is inspected while is retired. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Would it be right to say that Fabian has a premium discount?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007079", "pair_id": "u007079-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007079-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ee1d68854ffb620c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007079-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is not inspected. Fabian has flood coverage. Zdenek has no flood coverage. Fabian is retired. Bruno is uninsurable. Bruno has flood coverage. Fabian is not uninsurable. Bruno is appraised. Fabian is not inspected. Fabian has a claim frequency of 22. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 38. Zdenek is appraised. Zdenek is uninsurable. Fabian is lapsed. Fabian has no adjuster. Bruno is lapsed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a claim frequency not above 66, so it is not reimbursed. No. 2 While the given policyholder is lapsed, so it has a dashcam. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a payout ceiling that falls below 79 and likewise has a claim frequency not above 21 and likewise has flood coverage, so it has no premium discount. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a claim frequency not above 69 and likewise is appraised, so it has a beneficiary. No. 5 While the given policyholder is a smoker and likewise is uninsurable and likewise has a payout ceiling not above 25, so it is reimbursed. No. 6 While the given policyholder has a payout ceiling that falls below 79 and likewise is uninsurable and likewise has an adjuster, so it has a premium discount. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a deductible waiver. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is inspected and likewise is retired. No. 3 wins over No. 6. No. 1 wins over No. 5. Question: Is the claim \"Fabian has a premium discount\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007079", "pair_id": "u007079-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007079-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d9aa06345034fbd9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007079-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is not inspected. Fabian has flood coverage. Zdenek has no flood coverage. Fabian is retired. Bruno is uninsurable. Bruno has flood coverage. Fabian is not uninsurable. Bruno is appraised. Fabian is not inspected. Fabian has a claim frequency of 22. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 38. Zdenek is appraised. Zdenek is uninsurable. Fabian is lapsed. Fabian has no adjuster. Bruno is lapsed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a claim frequency not above 66, so it is not reimbursed. No. 2 While the given policyholder is lapsed, so it has a dashcam. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a payout ceiling that falls below 79 and likewise has a claim frequency not above 29 and likewise has flood coverage, so it has no premium discount. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a claim frequency not above 69 and likewise is appraised, so it has a beneficiary. No. 5 While the given policyholder is a smoker and likewise is uninsurable and likewise has a payout ceiling not above 25, so it is reimbursed. No. 6 While the given policyholder has a payout ceiling that falls below 79 and likewise is uninsurable and likewise has an adjuster, so it has a premium discount. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a deductible waiver. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is inspected and likewise is retired. No. 3 wins over No. 6. No. 1 wins over No. 5. Question: Is the claim \"Fabian has a premium discount\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007079", "pair_id": "u007079-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007079-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ee1d68854ffb620c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007136-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not damaged. Liesel has a courier. Liesel is perishable. Ulla is damaged. Liesel is not palletized. Ulla has no courier.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is not palletized, thus it is not prepaid. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a locker slot while is not damaged, thus it is not fragile. Provision 3: when the parcel here is rerouted while is perishable while has a courier, thus it is delayed. Provision 4: when the parcel here has a locker slot while is damaged while is not prepaid, thus it is fragile. Provision 5: when the parcel here has a courier, thus it has a locker slot. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Ulla is not fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007136", "pair_id": "u007136-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007136-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "861c87f7c07df80d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u007136-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not damaged. Liesel has a courier. Liesel is perishable. Ulla is damaged. Liesel is not palletized. Ulla has a courier.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is not palletized, thus it is not prepaid. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a locker slot while is not damaged, thus it is not fragile. Provision 3: when the parcel here is rerouted while is perishable while has a courier, thus it is delayed. Provision 4: when the parcel here has a locker slot while is damaged while is not prepaid, thus it is fragile. Provision 5: when the parcel here has a courier, thus it has a locker slot. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Ulla is not fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007136", "pair_id": "u007136-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007136-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7acbf0a2bef00d9d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u007136-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not damaged. Liesel has a courier. Liesel is perishable. Ulla is damaged. Liesel is not palletized. Ulla has no courier.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not palletized, it thereby is not prepaid. Point B. If said parcel has a locker slot and further is not damaged, it thereby is not fragile. Point C. If said parcel is rerouted and further is perishable and further has a courier, it thereby is delayed. Point D. If said parcel has a locker slot and further is damaged and further is not prepaid, it thereby is fragile. Point E. If said parcel has a courier, it thereby has a locker slot. Point B supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Ulla is not fragile. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007136", "pair_id": "u007136-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007136-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "861c87f7c07df80d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u007136-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not damaged. Liesel has a courier. Liesel is perishable. Ulla is damaged. Liesel is not palletized. Ulla has a courier.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not palletized, it thereby is not prepaid. Point B. If said parcel has a locker slot and further is not damaged, it thereby is not fragile. Point C. If said parcel is rerouted and further is perishable and further has a courier, it thereby is delayed. Point D. If said parcel has a locker slot and further is damaged and further is not prepaid, it thereby is fragile. Point E. If said parcel has a courier, it thereby has a locker slot. Point B supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Ulla is not fragile. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007136", "pair_id": "u007136-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007136-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7acbf0a2bef00d9d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u007150-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is not encrypted. Cobalt has a GPU. Cobalt has a snapshot.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a GPU, it thereby has no failover node. Point B. If said workload has a snapshot, it thereby is patched. Point A is cancelled if said workload has a CPU quota short of 61. Question: Statement: Cobalt is not encrypted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007150", "pair_id": "u007150-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007150-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4a25854d4586cb4d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007150-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is not encrypted. Cobalt has a GPU. Cobalt has a snapshot. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 87.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a GPU, it thereby has no failover node. Point B. If said workload has a snapshot, it thereby is patched. Point A is cancelled if said workload has a CPU quota short of 61. Question: Statement: Cobalt is not encrypted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007150", "pair_id": "u007150-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007150-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "210076f3679ed378", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007156-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is not waitlisted. Florin is not postoperative. Florin is not triaged. Zora is waitlisted. Zora is referred. Zora is triaged.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a caregiver, it also is not diabetic. Clause 2: once any patient is waitlisted, it also has an interpreter. Clause 3: once any patient is not triaged, it also is anemic. Clause 4: once any patient is anemic, it also has a caregiver. Clause 5: once any patient is postoperative, it also is contagious. Clause 6: once any patient is contagious, it also is asthmatic. Clause 7: once any patient is asthmatic, it also is diabetic. Clause 8: once any patient is referred, it also is not admitted. Question: Does it follow that Florin is diabetic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007156", "pair_id": "u007156-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007156-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "01586a68d46da425", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007156-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is not waitlisted. Florin is not postoperative. Florin is not triaged. Zora is waitlisted. Zora is referred. Zora is triaged.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a caregiver, it also is not diabetic. Clause 2: once any patient is waitlisted, it also has an interpreter. Clause 3: once any patient is triaged, it also is anemic. Clause 4: once any patient is anemic, it also has a caregiver. Clause 5: once any patient is postoperative, it also is contagious. Clause 6: once any patient is contagious, it also is asthmatic. Clause 7: once any patient is asthmatic, it also is diabetic. Clause 8: once any patient is referred, it also is not admitted. Question: Does it follow that Florin is diabetic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007156", "pair_id": "u007156-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007156-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "f17a9a15e2336d30", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007156-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is not waitlisted. Florin is not postoperative. Florin is not triaged. Zora is waitlisted. Zora is referred. Zora is triaged.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient has a caregiver, that patient is not diabetic. Item B. When the patient is waitlisted, that patient has an interpreter. Item C. When the patient is not triaged, that patient is anemic. Item D. When the patient is anemic, that patient has a caregiver. Item E. When the patient is postoperative, that patient is contagious. Item F. When the patient is contagious, that patient is asthmatic. Item G. When the patient is asthmatic, that patient is diabetic. Item H. When the patient is referred, that patient is not admitted. Question: Can one infer that Florin is diabetic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007156", "pair_id": "u007156-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007156-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "01586a68d46da425", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007156-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is not waitlisted. Florin is not postoperative. Florin is not triaged. Zora is waitlisted. Zora is referred. Zora is triaged.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient has a caregiver, that patient is not diabetic. Item B. When the patient is waitlisted, that patient has an interpreter. Item C. When the patient is triaged, that patient is anemic. Item D. When the patient is anemic, that patient has a caregiver. Item E. When the patient is postoperative, that patient is contagious. Item F. When the patient is contagious, that patient is asthmatic. Item G. When the patient is asthmatic, that patient is diabetic. Item H. When the patient is referred, that patient is not admitted. Question: Can one infer that Florin is diabetic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007156", "pair_id": "u007156-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007156-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "f17a9a15e2336d30", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007159-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor has a commute radius of 39. Noor is seasoned. Noor has a signing bonus. Lotte has an aptitude quotient of 42. Noor has a seniority step of 14. Noor has no mentor. Lotte has a seniority step of 26. Noor is sponsored. Sigrid has a notice period of 34. Sigrid is not seasoned. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 41. Kalle has a seniority step of 65. Sigrid is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is licensed while has a notice period beyond 54, thus it is relocating. Provision 2: when the candidate here is licensed while has a signing bonus, thus it is eligible. Provision 3: when the candidate here is licensed while has a notice period at or below 54, thus it is headhunted. Provision 4: when the candidate here has a seniority step at or below 25, thus it is licensed. Provision 5: when the candidate here has a mentor while is seasoned, thus it has a diploma. Provision 6: when the candidate here is licensed while has an aptitude quotient at or below 65, thus it is bonded. Provision 7: when the candidate here is licensed while has a commute radius beyond 11 while has a notice period at or above 15, thus it has a portfolio. Provision 8: when the candidate here is licensed while is sponsored, thus it has a visa. Provision 9: when the candidate here is licensed while has an aptitude quotient beyond 65, thus it is onboarded. Provision 7 has no effect when the candidate here is sponsored. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is sponsored. Question: Which one describes Noor?", "options": ["is headhunted", "is relocating", "has a visa", "is bonded", "is onboarded", "has a portfolio", "is eligible"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a visa", "unit_id": "u007159", "pair_id": "u007159-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007159-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0028e9206d57d8e1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a6", "a4", "a5", "a13", "a11", "a9"]}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u007159-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor has a commute radius of 39. Noor is seasoned. Noor has a signing bonus. Lotte has an aptitude quotient of 42. Noor has a seniority step of 14. Noor has no mentor. Lotte has a seniority step of 26. Noor is not sponsored. Sigrid has a notice period of 34. Sigrid is not seasoned. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 41. Kalle has a seniority step of 65. Sigrid is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is licensed while has a notice period beyond 54, thus it is relocating. Provision 2: when the candidate here is licensed while has a signing bonus, thus it is eligible. Provision 3: when the candidate here is licensed while has a notice period at or below 54, thus it is headhunted. Provision 4: when the candidate here has a seniority step at or below 25, thus it is licensed. Provision 5: when the candidate here has a mentor while is seasoned, thus it has a diploma. Provision 6: when the candidate here is licensed while has an aptitude quotient at or below 65, thus it is bonded. Provision 7: when the candidate here is licensed while has a commute radius beyond 11 while has a notice period at or above 15, thus it has a portfolio. Provision 8: when the candidate here is licensed while is sponsored, thus it has a visa. Provision 9: when the candidate here is licensed while has an aptitude quotient beyond 65, thus it is onboarded. Provision 7 has no effect when the candidate here is sponsored. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is sponsored. Question: Which one describes Noor?", "options": ["is headhunted", "is relocating", "has a visa", "is bonded", "is onboarded", "has a portfolio", "is eligible"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is eligible", "unit_id": "u007159", "pair_id": "u007159-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007159-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "54e2dcf3e1134d7e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a6", "a4", "a5", "a13", "a11", "a9"]}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u007172-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ilse has no escrow account. Ilse is not a homeowner. Ilse is amortized. Ilse is prequalified. Ilse is not solvent.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has no escrow account, it also is delinquent. Clause 2: once any borrower is prequalified, it also is overdrawn. Clause 3: once any borrower is employed, it also has a lien. Clause 4: once any borrower is not prequalified, it also is vetted. Clause 5: once any borrower has a debt ratio under 32, it also is refinanced. Clause 6: once any borrower is not amortized, it also has a mortgage. Clause 7: once any borrower is a homeowner, it also has collateral. Clause 8: once any borrower has a debt ratio of 32 or more, it also is employed. Clause 9: once any borrower has a risk tier of 28 or more, it also is creditworthy. Clause 9 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is not amortized. Clause 8 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is solvent. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is solvent. Question: Which of these is true of Ilse?", "options": ["has a mortgage", "is overdrawn", "is refinanced", "is employed", "is creditworthy", "is vetted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is overdrawn", "unit_id": "u007172", "pair_id": "u007172-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007172-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "35c6bf5b3c5b86ab", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a5", "a1", "a3", "a7", "a2"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u007172-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ilse has no escrow account. Ilse is not a homeowner. Ilse is amortized. Ilse is not prequalified. Ilse is not solvent.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has no escrow account, it also is delinquent. Clause 2: once any borrower is prequalified, it also is overdrawn. Clause 3: once any borrower is employed, it also has a lien. Clause 4: once any borrower is not prequalified, it also is vetted. Clause 5: once any borrower has a debt ratio under 32, it also is refinanced. Clause 6: once any borrower is not amortized, it also has a mortgage. Clause 7: once any borrower is a homeowner, it also has collateral. Clause 8: once any borrower has a debt ratio of 32 or more, it also is employed. Clause 9: once any borrower has a risk tier of 28 or more, it also is creditworthy. Clause 9 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is not amortized. Clause 8 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is solvent. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is solvent. Question: Which of these is true of Ilse?", "options": ["has a mortgage", "is overdrawn", "is refinanced", "is employed", "is creditworthy", "is vetted"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is vetted", "unit_id": "u007172", "pair_id": "u007172-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007172-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6fedc8ffaceda2c9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a5", "a1", "a3", "a7", "a2"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u007189-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri is not reimbursed. Celeste has a claim frequency of 50. Viggo has a claim frequency of 40. Celeste is a smoker. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 34. Viggo has a peril factor of 24. Viggo has a payout ceiling of 86. Celeste has a peril factor of 67. Viggo is not a smoker. Dmitri has a peril factor of 55. Dmitri is not covered. Celeste has no rider. Dmitri has a claim frequency of 60.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is reimbursed, and has a rider, and is a smoker, that policyholder is reinstated. Item B. When the policyholder is not uninsurable, and has a claim frequency of less than 87, and is a smoker, that policyholder is retired. Item C. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of no less than 25, that policyholder is appraised. Item D. When the policyholder is not uninsurable, and has a claim frequency of no less than 87, that policyholder is not retired. Item E. When the policyholder is appraised, and has a payout ceiling of less than 87, that policyholder is not uninsurable. Item B is suspended when the policyholder is covered, and has a peril factor of no less than 55. Item A is suspended when the policyholder is not covered. Question: Can one infer that Celeste is retired?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007189", "pair_id": "u007189-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007189-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7494dd976079b766", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u007189-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri is not reimbursed. Celeste has a claim frequency of 50. Viggo has a claim frequency of 40. Celeste is a smoker. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 34. Viggo has a peril factor of 24. Viggo has a payout ceiling of 86. Celeste has a peril factor of 83. Viggo is not a smoker. Dmitri has a peril factor of 55. Dmitri is not covered. Celeste has no rider. Dmitri has a claim frequency of 60.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is reimbursed, and has a rider, and is a smoker, that policyholder is reinstated. Item B. When the policyholder is not uninsurable, and has a claim frequency of less than 87, and is a smoker, that policyholder is retired. Item C. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of no less than 25, that policyholder is appraised. Item D. When the policyholder is not uninsurable, and has a claim frequency of no less than 87, that policyholder is not retired. Item E. When the policyholder is appraised, and has a payout ceiling of less than 87, that policyholder is not uninsurable. Item B is suspended when the policyholder is covered, and has a peril factor of no less than 55. Item A is suspended when the policyholder is not covered. Question: Can one infer that Celeste is retired?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007189", "pair_id": "u007189-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007189-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "edb53ddc3c51899e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u007196-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is reimbursed. Viggo has a premium band of 88. Viggo is subrogated. Viggo has a peril factor of 71. Bruno has a payout ceiling of 82. Viggo is reimbursed. Bruno is not subrogated. Viggo has a payout ceiling of 80.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is reinstated: then it is lapsed. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is grandfathered: then it is reinstated. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a peril factor higher than 33: then it is grandfathered. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is reinstated: then it is not lapsed. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has a payout ceiling higher than 77: then it is not covered. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is subrogated: then it is not appraised. Policy I is waived if that policyholder has a payout ceiling smaller than 27. Policy V is waived if that policyholder is subrogated. Policy III is waived if that policyholder has a premium band smaller than 83. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is reimbursed. Policy IV is waived if that policyholder has a payout ceiling no lower than 81. Question: Is it so that Viggo is not lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007196", "pair_id": "u007196-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/4/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007196-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e399271dd3c2e7ba", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007196-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is reimbursed. Viggo has a premium band of 88. Viggo is subrogated. Viggo has a peril factor of 71. Bruno has a payout ceiling of 82. Viggo is reimbursed. Bruno is not subrogated. Viggo has a payout ceiling of 80.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is reinstated: then it is lapsed. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is grandfathered: then it is reinstated. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a peril factor higher than 33: then it is grandfathered. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is reinstated: then it is not lapsed. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has a payout ceiling higher than 77: then it is not covered. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is subrogated: then it is not appraised. Policy I is waived if that policyholder has a payout ceiling smaller than 27. Policy V is waived if that policyholder is subrogated. Policy III is waived if that policyholder has a premium band smaller than 83. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is reimbursed. Policy IV is waived if that policyholder has a payout ceiling no lower than 27. Question: Is it so that Viggo is not lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007196", "pair_id": "u007196-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/4/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007196-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "27efcd8bdad2d2e3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007208-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is not minified. Shale has a migration script. Shale has a test yield of 15. Shale has a lint backlog of 21. Shale is not fuzzed. Shale is not compiled. Shale has a security advisory.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a lint backlog no higher than 58: then it has no changelog. Policy II. Suppose that build is not compiled: then it is not localized. Policy III. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is not signed. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a test yield smaller than 44: then it has a changelog. Policy V. Suppose that build is not experimental: then it is documented. Policy VI. Suppose that build has a security advisory: then it is not documented. Policy VII. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is notarized. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is compiled: then it is profiled. Policy IX. Suppose that build is not localized: then it is linted. Policy X. Suppose that build is benchmarked: then it is versioned. Policy XI. Suppose that build is not benchmarked: then it is not experimental. Policy XII. Suppose that build is minified: then it is reverted. Policy XIII. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is signed. Policy XIV. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is not obsolete. Policy XV. Suppose that build is profiled: then it has a feature toggle. Policy XVI. Suppose that build is versioned: then it is flaky. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy XIII. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy IV. Question: Which choice is right for Shale?", "options": ["is documented", "has a feature toggle", "is notarized", "is linted", "is flaky", "is signed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is linted", "unit_id": "u007208", "pair_id": "u007208-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007208-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ba1eb1e73894763f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a16", "a3", "a7", "a10", "a18", "a14"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007208-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is not minified. Shale has a migration script. Shale has a test yield of 15. Shale has a lint backlog of 21. Shale is not fuzzed. Shale is compiled. Shale has a security advisory.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a lint backlog no higher than 58: then it has no changelog. Policy II. Suppose that build is not compiled: then it is not localized. Policy III. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is not signed. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a test yield smaller than 44: then it has a changelog. Policy V. Suppose that build is not experimental: then it is documented. Policy VI. Suppose that build has a security advisory: then it is not documented. Policy VII. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is notarized. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is compiled: then it is profiled. Policy IX. Suppose that build is not localized: then it is linted. Policy X. Suppose that build is benchmarked: then it is versioned. Policy XI. Suppose that build is not benchmarked: then it is not experimental. Policy XII. Suppose that build is minified: then it is reverted. Policy XIII. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is signed. Policy XIV. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is not obsolete. Policy XV. Suppose that build is profiled: then it has a feature toggle. Policy XVI. Suppose that build is versioned: then it is flaky. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy XIII. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy IV. Question: Which choice is right for Shale?", "options": ["is documented", "has a feature toggle", "is notarized", "is linted", "is flaky", "is signed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a feature toggle", "unit_id": "u007208", "pair_id": "u007208-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007208-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "549e8bdd840b2c2d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a16", "a3", "a7", "a10", "a18", "a14"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007208-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is not minified. Shale has a migration script. Shale has a test yield of 15. Shale has a lint backlog of 21. Shale is not fuzzed. Shale is not compiled. Shale has a security advisory.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a lint backlog of 58 or below, it then has no changelog. #2 Each time a build is not compiled, it then is not localized. #3 Each time a build has a changelog, it then is not signed. #4 Each time a build has a test yield less than 44, it then has a changelog. #5 Each time a build is not experimental, it then is documented. #6 Each time a build has a security advisory, it then is not documented. #7 Each time a build has a changelog, it then is notarized. #8 Each time a build is compiled, it then is profiled. #9 Each time a build is not localized, it then is linted. #10 Each time a build is benchmarked, it then is versioned. #11 Each time a build is not benchmarked, it then is not experimental. #12 Each time a build is minified, it then is reverted. #13 Each time a build is reverted, it then is signed. #14 Each time a build is fuzzed, it then is not obsolete. #15 Each time a build is profiled, it then has a feature toggle. #16 Each time a build is versioned, it then is flaky. #13 yields to #3. #6 yields to #5. #4 yields to #1. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Shale?", "options": ["is documented", "has a feature toggle", "is notarized", "is linted", "is flaky", "is signed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is linted", "unit_id": "u007208", "pair_id": "u007208-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007208-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ba1eb1e73894763f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a16", "a3", "a7", "a10", "a18", "a14"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007208-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is not minified. Shale has a migration script. Shale has a test yield of 15. Shale has a lint backlog of 21. Shale is not fuzzed. Shale is compiled. Shale has a security advisory.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a lint backlog of 58 or below, it then has no changelog. #2 Each time a build is not compiled, it then is not localized. #3 Each time a build has a changelog, it then is not signed. #4 Each time a build has a test yield less than 44, it then has a changelog. #5 Each time a build is not experimental, it then is documented. #6 Each time a build has a security advisory, it then is not documented. #7 Each time a build has a changelog, it then is notarized. #8 Each time a build is compiled, it then is profiled. #9 Each time a build is not localized, it then is linted. #10 Each time a build is benchmarked, it then is versioned. #11 Each time a build is not benchmarked, it then is not experimental. #12 Each time a build is minified, it then is reverted. #13 Each time a build is reverted, it then is signed. #14 Each time a build is fuzzed, it then is not obsolete. #15 Each time a build is profiled, it then has a feature toggle. #16 Each time a build is versioned, it then is flaky. #13 yields to #3. #6 yields to #5. #4 yields to #1. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Shale?", "options": ["is documented", "has a feature toggle", "is notarized", "is linted", "is flaky", "is signed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a feature toggle", "unit_id": "u007208", "pair_id": "u007208-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007208-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "549e8bdd840b2c2d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a16", "a3", "a7", "a10", "a18", "a14"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007240-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vilja has a caregiver. Vilja has a pain level of 16. Gunnar is not allergic. Cosima has a pain level of 12. Vilja is not allergic. Vilja is anemic. Vilja has no chaperone. Cosima is not anemic. Gunnar has no caregiver.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has a pain level no higher than 16 plus is anemic: then it is waitlisted. Policy II. Suppose that patient has a chaperone: then it is bedridden. Policy III. Suppose that patient is waitlisted plus is anemic: then it is admitted. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is admitted plus is allergic: then it is pregnant. Policy V. Suppose that patient is allergic plus has a pain level no higher than 20: then it is not waitlisted. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is admitted plus has a caregiver: then it is triaged. Policy VI is waived if that patient is allergic. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy V. Question: Which choice is right for Vilja?", "options": ["is pregnant", "is triaged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is triaged", "unit_id": "u007240", "pair_id": "u007240-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007240-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b891843b8ac405f2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a3"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u007240-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vilja has a caregiver. Vilja has a pain level of 16. Gunnar is not allergic. Cosima has a pain level of 12. Vilja is not allergic. Vilja is anemic. Vilja has a chaperone. Cosima is not anemic. Gunnar has no caregiver.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has a pain level no higher than 16 plus is anemic: then it is waitlisted. Policy II. Suppose that patient has a chaperone: then it is bedridden. Policy III. Suppose that patient is waitlisted plus is anemic: then it is admitted. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is admitted plus is allergic: then it is pregnant. Policy V. Suppose that patient is allergic plus has a pain level no higher than 20: then it is not waitlisted. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is admitted plus has a caregiver: then it is triaged. Policy VI is waived if that patient is allergic. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy V. Question: Which choice is right for Vilja?", "options": ["is pregnant", "is triaged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is triaged", "unit_id": "u007240", "pair_id": "u007240-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007240-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a253a12c6cb00e59", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a3"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u007240-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vilja has a caregiver. Vilja has a pain level of 16. Gunnar is not allergic. Cosima has a pain level of 12. Vilja is not allergic. Vilja is anemic. Vilja has no chaperone. Cosima is not anemic. Gunnar has no caregiver.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has a pain level of 16 or below and additionally is anemic, it then is waitlisted. #2 Each time a patient has a chaperone, it then is bedridden. #3 Each time a patient is waitlisted and additionally is anemic, it then is admitted. #4 Each time a patient is admitted and additionally is allergic, it then is pregnant. #5 Each time a patient is allergic and additionally has a pain level of 20 or below, it then is not waitlisted. #6 Each time a patient is admitted and additionally has a caregiver, it then is triaged. #6 is set aside if a patient is allergic. #5 yields to #1. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Vilja?", "options": ["is pregnant", "is triaged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is triaged", "unit_id": "u007240", "pair_id": "u007240-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007240-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b891843b8ac405f2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a3"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u007240-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vilja has a caregiver. Vilja has a pain level of 16. Gunnar is not allergic. Cosima has a pain level of 12. Vilja is not allergic. Vilja is anemic. Vilja has a chaperone. Cosima is not anemic. Gunnar has no caregiver.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has a pain level of 16 or below and additionally is anemic, it then is waitlisted. #2 Each time a patient has a chaperone, it then is bedridden. #3 Each time a patient is waitlisted and additionally is anemic, it then is admitted. #4 Each time a patient is admitted and additionally is allergic, it then is pregnant. #5 Each time a patient is allergic and additionally has a pain level of 20 or below, it then is not waitlisted. #6 Each time a patient is admitted and additionally has a caregiver, it then is triaged. #6 is set aside if a patient is allergic. #5 yields to #1. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Vilja?", "options": ["is pregnant", "is triaged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is triaged", "unit_id": "u007240", "pair_id": "u007240-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007240-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a253a12c6cb00e59", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a3"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u007273-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is not weighed. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 25. Rasmus is oversized. Rasmus has a weight class of 59. Rasmus is not sealed. Rasmus has a waybill. Rasmus is stamped. Rasmus is fragile.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is palletized provided that it has a waybill. Section 2: a parcel is prepaid provided that it is tracked as well as has a weight class of 39 or higher. Section 3: a parcel is not tracked provided that it has a parcel volume of 67 or higher as well as has a delivery window exceeding 51 as well as is sealed. Section 4: a parcel is rerouted provided that it is fragile. Section 5: a parcel is tracked provided that it is rerouted as well as has a waybill. Section 6: a parcel is not prepaid provided that it is tracked as well as has a weight class of 39 or higher as well as has a waybill. Section 7: a parcel is not rerouted provided that it has a weight class exceeding 61. Section 8: a parcel has no barcode provided that it is weighed as well as has a postal zone of 83 or lower as well as has a delivery window of 31 or lower. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it has a postal zone of 31 or higher. Section 7 lapses for a parcel if it is stamped as well as is oversized. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 7. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Rasmus is prepaid. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007273", "pair_id": "u007273-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007273-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cd8167fc9c6c1cd3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u007273-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is not weighed. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 25. Rasmus is oversized. Rasmus has a weight class of 59. Rasmus is not sealed. Rasmus has a waybill. Rasmus is stamped. Rasmus is fragile.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is palletized provided that it has a waybill. Section 2: a parcel is prepaid provided that it is tracked as well as has a weight class lower than 39. Section 3: a parcel is not tracked provided that it has a parcel volume of 67 or higher as well as has a delivery window exceeding 51 as well as is sealed. Section 4: a parcel is rerouted provided that it is fragile. Section 5: a parcel is tracked provided that it is rerouted as well as has a waybill. Section 6: a parcel is not prepaid provided that it is tracked as well as has a weight class of 39 or higher as well as has a waybill. Section 7: a parcel is not rerouted provided that it has a weight class exceeding 61. Section 8: a parcel has no barcode provided that it is weighed as well as has a postal zone of 83 or lower as well as has a delivery window of 31 or lower. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it has a postal zone of 31 or higher. Section 7 lapses for a parcel if it is stamped as well as is oversized. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 7. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Rasmus is prepaid. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007273", "pair_id": "u007273-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007273-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4f40a69d4f626243", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u007275-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is underwritten. Folke is bankrupt. Hamid is not a homeowner. Hamid is underwritten. Hamid has a debt ratio of 53.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower has a debt ratio of at least 67, then it has an escrow account. (2) If a borrower is not bankrupt and is underwritten, then it is indebted. Question: Is it true that Folke is not a homeowner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007275", "pair_id": "u007275-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007275-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a7783ef8835f91a0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007275-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is a homeowner. Folke is underwritten. Folke is bankrupt. Hamid is not a homeowner. Hamid is underwritten. Hamid has a debt ratio of 53.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower has a debt ratio of at least 67, then it has an escrow account. (2) If a borrower is not bankrupt and is underwritten, then it is indebted. Question: Is it true that Folke is not a homeowner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007275", "pair_id": "u007275-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007275-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "dd34cd0b36d9d5d5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007275-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is underwritten. Folke is bankrupt. Hamid is not a homeowner. Hamid is underwritten. Hamid has a debt ratio of 53.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a debt ratio of 67 or more, it also has an escrow account. Clause 2: once any borrower is not bankrupt and also is underwritten, it also is indebted. Question: Does it follow that Folke is not a homeowner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007275", "pair_id": "u007275-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007275-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a7783ef8835f91a0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007275-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is a homeowner. Folke is underwritten. Folke is bankrupt. Hamid is not a homeowner. Hamid is underwritten. Hamid has a debt ratio of 53.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a debt ratio of 67 or more, it also has an escrow account. Clause 2: once any borrower is not bankrupt and also is underwritten, it also is indebted. Question: Does it follow that Folke is not a homeowner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007275", "pair_id": "u007275-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007275-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "dd34cd0b36d9d5d5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007298-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Capella is interdisciplinary. Capella is resubmitted. Capella is not budgeted. Capella is not cofunded. Capella is not a pilot study. Capella is translational. Capella has no industry backing. Capella is not longitudinal. Capella has a patent filing.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has no field site provided that it is translational. Section 2: a proposal has no postdoc provided that it is a pilot study. Section 3: a proposal has a field site provided that it is resubmitted as well as has a patent filing. Section 4: a proposal is not multicenter provided that it is longitudinal. Section 5: a proposal is collaborative provided that it is resubmitted as well as is longitudinal as well as has ethics clearance. Section 6: a proposal is renewed provided that it is resubmitted as well as is cofunded. Section 7: a proposal is not peer reviewed provided that it has industry backing. Section 8: a proposal is multicenter provided that it is resubmitted as well as is budgeted. Section 9: a proposal has seed funding provided that it is resubmitted as well as has industry backing. Section 10: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it is resubmitted as well as is embargoed. Section 11: a proposal has a steering committee provided that it is resubmitted as well as is interdisciplinary as well as is shortlisted. Section 12: a proposal has no steering committee provided that it is cofunded. Section 13: a proposal is endorsed provided that it is resubmitted as well as is translational. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 12 takes precedence over Section 11. Question: Which statement fits Capella?", "options": ["is renewed", "has a steering committee", "has seed funding", "is collaborative", "is endorsed", "has a field site", "is multicenter", "is peer reviewed"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u007298", "pair_id": "u007298-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007298-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "66cd74e20b870d2f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a11", "a0", "a14", "a18", "a10", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u007298-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Capella is interdisciplinary. Capella is resubmitted. Capella is not budgeted. Capella is not cofunded. Capella is not a pilot study. Capella is not translational. Capella has no industry backing. Capella is not longitudinal. Capella has a patent filing.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has no field site provided that it is translational. Section 2: a proposal has no postdoc provided that it is a pilot study. Section 3: a proposal has a field site provided that it is resubmitted as well as has a patent filing. Section 4: a proposal is not multicenter provided that it is longitudinal. Section 5: a proposal is collaborative provided that it is resubmitted as well as is longitudinal as well as has ethics clearance. Section 6: a proposal is renewed provided that it is resubmitted as well as is cofunded. Section 7: a proposal is not peer reviewed provided that it has industry backing. Section 8: a proposal is multicenter provided that it is resubmitted as well as is budgeted. Section 9: a proposal has seed funding provided that it is resubmitted as well as has industry backing. Section 10: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it is resubmitted as well as is embargoed. Section 11: a proposal has a steering committee provided that it is resubmitted as well as is interdisciplinary as well as is shortlisted. Section 12: a proposal has no steering committee provided that it is cofunded. Section 13: a proposal is endorsed provided that it is resubmitted as well as is translational. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 12 takes precedence over Section 11. Question: Which statement fits Capella?", "options": ["is renewed", "has a steering committee", "has seed funding", "is collaborative", "is endorsed", "has a field site", "is multicenter", "is peer reviewed"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a field site", "unit_id": "u007298", "pair_id": "u007298-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007298-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d02c343ddc10ee2d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a11", "a0", "a14", "a18", "a10", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u007298-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Capella is interdisciplinary. Capella is resubmitted. Capella is not budgeted. Capella is not cofunded. Capella is not a pilot study. Capella is translational. Capella has no industry backing. Capella is not longitudinal. Capella has a patent filing.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is translational, it then has no field site. #2 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then has no postdoc. #3 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally has a patent filing, it then has a field site. #4 Each time a proposal is longitudinal, it then is not multicenter. #5 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally is longitudinal and additionally has ethics clearance, it then is collaborative. #6 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally is cofunded, it then is renewed. #7 Each time a proposal has industry backing, it then is not peer reviewed. #8 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally is budgeted, it then is multicenter. #9 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally has industry backing, it then has seed funding. #10 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally is embargoed, it then is peer reviewed. #11 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally is interdisciplinary and additionally is shortlisted, it then has a steering committee. #12 Each time a proposal is cofunded, it then has no steering committee. #13 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally is translational, it then is endorsed. #10 yields to #7. #8 yields to #4. #3 yields to #1. #11 yields to #12. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Capella?", "options": ["is renewed", "has a steering committee", "has seed funding", "is collaborative", "is endorsed", "has a field site", "is multicenter", "is peer reviewed"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u007298", "pair_id": "u007298-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007298-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "66cd74e20b870d2f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a11", "a0", "a14", "a18", "a10", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u007298-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Capella is interdisciplinary. Capella is resubmitted. Capella is not budgeted. Capella is not cofunded. Capella is not a pilot study. Capella is not translational. Capella has no industry backing. Capella is not longitudinal. Capella has a patent filing.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is translational, it then has no field site. #2 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then has no postdoc. #3 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally has a patent filing, it then has a field site. #4 Each time a proposal is longitudinal, it then is not multicenter. #5 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally is longitudinal and additionally has ethics clearance, it then is collaborative. #6 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally is cofunded, it then is renewed. #7 Each time a proposal has industry backing, it then is not peer reviewed. #8 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally is budgeted, it then is multicenter. #9 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally has industry backing, it then has seed funding. #10 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally is embargoed, it then is peer reviewed. #11 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally is interdisciplinary and additionally is shortlisted, it then has a steering committee. #12 Each time a proposal is cofunded, it then has no steering committee. #13 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally is translational, it then is endorsed. #10 yields to #7. #8 yields to #4. #3 yields to #1. #11 yields to #12. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Capella?", "options": ["is renewed", "has a steering committee", "has seed funding", "is collaborative", "is endorsed", "has a field site", "is multicenter", "is peer reviewed"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a field site", "unit_id": "u007298", "pair_id": "u007298-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007298-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d02c343ddc10ee2d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a11", "a0", "a14", "a18", "a10", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u007322-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis has no failover node. Borealis is not sandboxed. Borealis is monitored.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload has a CPU quota of at least 19, then it has no GPU. (2) If a workload has a GPU, then it is not idle. (3) If a workload has a CPU quota below 42, then it is not replicated. (4) If a workload has a CPU quota of at most 62, then it is not containerized. (5) If a workload has no failover node, then it is replicated. (6) If a workload is replicated, then it is idle. (7) If a workload is monitored, then it has a GPU. (8) If a workload is sandboxed, then it is containerized. (9) If a workload has a CPU quota below 88, then it is deprecated. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. When (6) and (2) clash, (6) prevails. When (8) and (4) clash, (8) prevails. When (7) and (1) clash, (7) prevails. Question: Is it true that Borealis is idle?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007322", "pair_id": "u007322-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007322-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec5395003806e51a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007322-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis has no failover node. Borealis is not sandboxed. Borealis is monitored.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload has a CPU quota of at least 19, then it has no GPU. (2) If a workload has a GPU, then it is not idle. (3) If a workload has a CPU quota below 42, then it is not replicated. (4) If a workload has a CPU quota of at most 62, then it is not containerized. (5) If a workload has a failover node, then it is replicated. (6) If a workload is replicated, then it is idle. (7) If a workload is monitored, then it has a GPU. (8) If a workload is sandboxed, then it is containerized. (9) If a workload has a CPU quota below 88, then it is deprecated. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. When (6) and (2) clash, (6) prevails. When (8) and (4) clash, (8) prevails. When (7) and (1) clash, (7) prevails. Question: Is it true that Borealis is idle?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007322", "pair_id": "u007322-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007322-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9c132b86238133d6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007323-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has no diploma. Jasna is a graduate. Jasna is not onboarded. Jasna has a signing bonus.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is not a graduate, it also is not bonded. Clause 2: once any candidate has a signing bonus and also is not onboarded and also is a graduate, it also has a mentor. Clause 3: once any candidate has a diploma and also is a graduate and also has no signing bonus, it also is bonded. Clause 4: once any candidate has a signing bonus and also is not onboarded, it also has no mentor. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Clause 4 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Jasna has a mentor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007323", "pair_id": "u007323-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007323-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4ee67ce840456026", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007323-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has no diploma. Jasna is a graduate. Jasna is not onboarded. Jasna has a signing bonus.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is not a graduate, it also is not bonded. Clause 2: once any candidate has a signing bonus and also is not onboarded and also is a graduate, it also has a mentor. Clause 3: once any candidate has a diploma and also is a graduate and also has no signing bonus, it also is bonded. Clause 4: once any candidate has a signing bonus and also is onboarded, it also has no mentor. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Clause 4 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Jasna has a mentor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007323", "pair_id": "u007323-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007323-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b2b7af5dfdbfa82c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007325-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is reverted. Schist is merged. Zircon is not fuzzed. Schist is reverted. Zircon is not reproducible.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is merged, thus it has a migration script. Provision 2: when the build here is not reproducible, thus it is tagged. Provision 3: when the build here has a test yield beyond 50, thus it is not notarized. Provision 4: when the build here has a security advisory, thus it is not tagged. Provision 5: when the build here is fuzzed, thus it has a changelog. Provision 6: when the build here is reproducible, thus it is linted. Provision 7: when the build here is fuzzed, thus it is not linted. Provision 8: when the build here is tagged, thus it is not localized. Provision 9: when the build here is reverted, thus it is notarized. Provision 10: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is localized. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Zircon is localized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007325", "pair_id": "u007325-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007325-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cdeef5160f87d819", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007325-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is reverted. Schist is merged. Zircon is not fuzzed. Schist is reverted. Zircon is not reproducible.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is merged, thus it has a migration script. Provision 2: when the build here is reproducible, thus it is tagged. Provision 3: when the build here has a test yield beyond 50, thus it is not notarized. Provision 4: when the build here has a security advisory, thus it is not tagged. Provision 5: when the build here is fuzzed, thus it has a changelog. Provision 6: when the build here is reproducible, thus it is linted. Provision 7: when the build here is fuzzed, thus it is not linted. Provision 8: when the build here is tagged, thus it is not localized. Provision 9: when the build here is reverted, thus it is notarized. Provision 10: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is localized. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Zircon is localized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007325", "pair_id": "u007325-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007325-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3beb8bf5c93f18f4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007325-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is reverted. Schist is merged. Zircon is not fuzzed. Schist is reverted. Zircon is not reproducible.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is merged, it thereby has a migration script. Point B. If said build is not reproducible, it thereby is tagged. Point C. If said build has a test yield in excess of 50, it thereby is not notarized. Point D. If said build has a security advisory, it thereby is not tagged. Point E. If said build is fuzzed, it thereby has a changelog. Point F. If said build is reproducible, it thereby is linted. Point G. If said build is fuzzed, it thereby is not linted. Point H. If said build is tagged, it thereby is not localized. Point I. If said build is reverted, it thereby is notarized. Point J. If said build has a migration script, it thereby is localized. Point B supersedes Point D. Point J supersedes Point H. Point G supersedes Point F. Point I supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Zircon is localized. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007325", "pair_id": "u007325-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007325-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cdeef5160f87d819", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007325-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is reverted. Schist is merged. Zircon is not fuzzed. Schist is reverted. Zircon is not reproducible.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is merged, it thereby has a migration script. Point B. If said build is reproducible, it thereby is tagged. Point C. If said build has a test yield in excess of 50, it thereby is not notarized. Point D. If said build has a security advisory, it thereby is not tagged. Point E. If said build is fuzzed, it thereby has a changelog. Point F. If said build is reproducible, it thereby is linted. Point G. If said build is fuzzed, it thereby is not linted. Point H. If said build is tagged, it thereby is not localized. Point I. If said build is reverted, it thereby is notarized. Point J. If said build has a migration script, it thereby is localized. Point B supersedes Point D. Point J supersedes Point H. Point G supersedes Point F. Point I supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Zircon is localized. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007325", "pair_id": "u007325-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007325-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3beb8bf5c93f18f4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007333-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is labeled. Nandor is not registered. Nandor is stamped. Nandor has no waybill. Quentin has no waybill. Quentin has a courier. Quentin is stamped. Quentin is not consolidated. Nandor is consolidated. Nandor is not refrigerated. Quentin is refrigerated. Quentin is registered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel has a courier, it thereby is undeliverable. Point B. If said parcel is consolidated and further has a courier, it thereby is not undeliverable. Point C. If said parcel is undeliverable and further has a courier and further is refrigerated, it thereby is not prepaid. Point D. If said parcel has a waybill, it thereby is not palletized. Point E. If said parcel is undeliverable and further has a courier and further is registered, it thereby is prepaid. Point F. If said parcel is prepaid, it thereby is not damaged. Point G. If said parcel is stamped and further is registered and further is sealed, it thereby is not delayed. Point G is cancelled if said parcel is oversized. Point F is cancelled if said parcel is labeled. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is labeled. Point C supersedes Point E. Point B supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Quentin is prepaid. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007333", "pair_id": "u007333-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007333-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "110e69386307d596", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u007333-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is labeled. Nandor is not registered. Nandor is stamped. Nandor has no waybill. Quentin has no waybill. Quentin has no courier. Quentin is stamped. Quentin is not consolidated. Nandor is consolidated. Nandor is not refrigerated. Quentin is refrigerated. Quentin is registered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel has a courier, it thereby is undeliverable. Point B. If said parcel is consolidated and further has a courier, it thereby is not undeliverable. Point C. If said parcel is undeliverable and further has a courier and further is refrigerated, it thereby is not prepaid. Point D. If said parcel has a waybill, it thereby is not palletized. Point E. If said parcel is undeliverable and further has a courier and further is registered, it thereby is prepaid. Point F. If said parcel is prepaid, it thereby is not damaged. Point G. If said parcel is stamped and further is registered and further is sealed, it thereby is not delayed. Point G is cancelled if said parcel is oversized. Point F is cancelled if said parcel is labeled. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is labeled. Point C supersedes Point E. Point B supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Quentin is prepaid. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007333", "pair_id": "u007333-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007333-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5d2f3d1e7a7269e1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u007346-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Teodor is relocating. Teodor is not bonded. Hedda is interviewed. Hedda has a signing bonus. Hedda is not onboarded. Teodor has no signing bonus. Teodor is onboarded. Hedda is not a graduate. Hedda is bonded. Teodor is a graduate.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is bonded, then it is fingerprinted. (2) If a candidate has a signing bonus, then it is probationary. (3) If a candidate is bonded, then it is not probationary. (4) If a candidate is a graduate, then it is bilingual. (5) If a candidate is onboarded, then it is eligible. (6) If a candidate is relocating, then it is not eligible. (7) If a candidate is interviewed, then it is unionized. (8) If a candidate is relocating, then it is licensed. When (6) and (5) clash, (6) prevails. When (3) and (2) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Hedda?", "options": ["is licensed", "is fingerprinted", "is probationary", "is bilingual", "is eligible"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is fingerprinted", "unit_id": "u007346", "pair_id": "u007346-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007346-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "266b437c2f8bd58b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a1", "a9", "a5", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007346-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Teodor is relocating. Teodor is not bonded. Hedda is interviewed. Hedda has a signing bonus. Hedda is not onboarded. Teodor has no signing bonus. Teodor is onboarded. Hedda is not a graduate. Hedda is not bonded. Teodor is a graduate.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is bonded, then it is fingerprinted. (2) If a candidate has a signing bonus, then it is probationary. (3) If a candidate is bonded, then it is not probationary. (4) If a candidate is a graduate, then it is bilingual. (5) If a candidate is onboarded, then it is eligible. (6) If a candidate is relocating, then it is not eligible. (7) If a candidate is interviewed, then it is unionized. (8) If a candidate is relocating, then it is licensed. When (6) and (5) clash, (6) prevails. When (3) and (2) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Hedda?", "options": ["is licensed", "is fingerprinted", "is probationary", "is bilingual", "is eligible"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is probationary", "unit_id": "u007346", "pair_id": "u007346-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007346-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "82e7e6146ceb8c5a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a1", "a9", "a5", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007346-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Teodor is relocating. Teodor is not bonded. Hedda is interviewed. Hedda has a signing bonus. Hedda is not onboarded. Teodor has no signing bonus. Teodor is onboarded. Hedda is not a graduate. Hedda is bonded. Teodor is a graduate.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is bonded, that candidate is fingerprinted. Item B. When the candidate has a signing bonus, that candidate is probationary. Item C. When the candidate is bonded, that candidate is not probationary. Item D. When the candidate is a graduate, that candidate is bilingual. Item E. When the candidate is onboarded, that candidate is eligible. Item F. When the candidate is relocating, that candidate is not eligible. Item G. When the candidate is interviewed, that candidate is unionized. Item H. When the candidate is relocating, that candidate is licensed. Item F outranks Item E. Item C outranks Item B. Question: What applies to Hedda?", "options": ["is licensed", "is fingerprinted", "is probationary", "is bilingual", "is eligible"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is fingerprinted", "unit_id": "u007346", "pair_id": "u007346-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007346-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "266b437c2f8bd58b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a1", "a9", "a5", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007346-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Teodor is relocating. Teodor is not bonded. Hedda is interviewed. Hedda has a signing bonus. Hedda is not onboarded. Teodor has no signing bonus. Teodor is onboarded. Hedda is not a graduate. Hedda is not bonded. Teodor is a graduate.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is bonded, that candidate is fingerprinted. Item B. When the candidate has a signing bonus, that candidate is probationary. Item C. When the candidate is bonded, that candidate is not probationary. Item D. When the candidate is a graduate, that candidate is bilingual. Item E. When the candidate is onboarded, that candidate is eligible. Item F. When the candidate is relocating, that candidate is not eligible. Item G. When the candidate is interviewed, that candidate is unionized. Item H. When the candidate is relocating, that candidate is licensed. Item F outranks Item E. Item C outranks Item B. Question: What applies to Hedda?", "options": ["is licensed", "is fingerprinted", "is probationary", "is bilingual", "is eligible"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is probationary", "unit_id": "u007346", "pair_id": "u007346-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007346-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "82e7e6146ceb8c5a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a1", "a9", "a5", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007361-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is not idle. Orrery has a public endpoint. Orrery is not replicated.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is autoscaled, then it is virtualized. (2) If a workload is stateless, then it is not virtualized. (3) If a workload is replicated, then it is not cached. (4) If a workload is idle, then it is stateless. (5) If a workload is replicated, then it is autoscaled. (6) If a workload has a public endpoint, then it is patched. Question: Is it true that Orrery is virtualized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007361", "pair_id": "u007361-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007361-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "9f4e29498f56b71d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007361-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is idle. Cobalt is not idle. Orrery has a public endpoint. Orrery is not replicated.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is autoscaled, then it is virtualized. (2) If a workload is stateless, then it is not virtualized. (3) If a workload is replicated, then it is not cached. (4) If a workload is idle, then it is stateless. (5) If a workload is replicated, then it is autoscaled. (6) If a workload has a public endpoint, then it is patched. Question: Is it true that Orrery is virtualized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007361", "pair_id": "u007361-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007361-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "783d4dc39da61690", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007361-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is not idle. Orrery has a public endpoint. Orrery is not replicated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is autoscaled, it also is virtualized. Clause 2: once any workload is stateless, it also is not virtualized. Clause 3: once any workload is replicated, it also is not cached. Clause 4: once any workload is idle, it also is stateless. Clause 5: once any workload is replicated, it also is autoscaled. Clause 6: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is patched. Question: Does it follow that Orrery is virtualized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007361", "pair_id": "u007361-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007361-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "9f4e29498f56b71d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007361-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is idle. Cobalt is not idle. Orrery has a public endpoint. Orrery is not replicated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is autoscaled, it also is virtualized. Clause 2: once any workload is stateless, it also is not virtualized. Clause 3: once any workload is replicated, it also is not cached. Clause 4: once any workload is idle, it also is stateless. Clause 5: once any workload is replicated, it also is autoscaled. Clause 6: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is patched. Question: Does it follow that Orrery is virtualized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007361", "pair_id": "u007361-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007361-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "783d4dc39da61690", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007361-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is not idle. Orrery has a public endpoint. Orrery is not replicated.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is autoscaled, that workload is virtualized. Item B. When the workload is stateless, that workload is not virtualized. Item C. When the workload is replicated, that workload is not cached. Item D. When the workload is idle, that workload is stateless. Item E. When the workload is replicated, that workload is autoscaled. Item F. When the workload has a public endpoint, that workload is patched. Question: Can one infer that Orrery is virtualized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007361", "pair_id": "u007361-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007361-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "9f4e29498f56b71d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007361-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is idle. Cobalt is not idle. Orrery has a public endpoint. Orrery is not replicated.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is autoscaled, that workload is virtualized. Item B. When the workload is stateless, that workload is not virtualized. Item C. When the workload is replicated, that workload is not cached. Item D. When the workload is idle, that workload is stateless. Item E. When the workload is replicated, that workload is autoscaled. Item F. When the workload has a public endpoint, that workload is patched. Question: Can one infer that Orrery is virtualized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007361", "pair_id": "u007361-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007361-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "783d4dc39da61690", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007367-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda is sponsored. Hedda has a notice period of 7. Teodor is not sponsored. Teodor has a notice period of 60.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a notice period that exceeds 64, so it is seasoned. No. 2 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it is bilingual. No. 3 While the given candidate has a notice period that falls below 68, so it is recommended. No. 4 While the given candidate has a notice period not above 64, so it is a veteran. No. 5 While the given candidate has a notice period that exceeds 60, so it is not recommended. No. 6 While the given candidate has a notice period that falls below 69, so it is not a graduate. No. 7 While the given candidate has a notice period that falls below 45, so it is not bilingual. No. 5 wins over No. 3. No. 7 wins over No. 2. Question: Select what holds for Teodor: which option?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is a veteran"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a veteran", "unit_id": "u007367", "pair_id": "u007367-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007367-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9086a94173b4f57c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a5", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007367-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda is sponsored. Hedda has a notice period of 7. Teodor is not sponsored. Teodor has a notice period of 61.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a notice period that exceeds 64, so it is seasoned. No. 2 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it is bilingual. No. 3 While the given candidate has a notice period that falls below 68, so it is recommended. No. 4 While the given candidate has a notice period not above 64, so it is a veteran. No. 5 While the given candidate has a notice period that exceeds 60, so it is not recommended. No. 6 While the given candidate has a notice period that falls below 69, so it is not a graduate. No. 7 While the given candidate has a notice period that falls below 45, so it is not bilingual. No. 5 wins over No. 3. No. 7 wins over No. 2. Question: Select what holds for Teodor: which option?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is a veteran"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a veteran", "unit_id": "u007367", "pair_id": "u007367-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007367-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f01b3b6f4801810e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a5", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007402-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is documented. Talc is not experimental. Talc is reverted. Obsidian is obsolete. Obsidian is documented. Obsidian is linted. Obsidian is reverted. Talc is not profiled.", "instruction": "(1) If a build has a migration script, then it is not flaky. (2) If a build is obsolete, then it is not localized. (3) If a build is not tagged, then it has no migration script. (4) If a build is reproducible, then it is notarized. (5) If a build is linted, then it is not notarized. (6) If a build is not profiled, then it is localized. (7) If a build is not experimental, then it is tagged. (8) If a build is not tagged, then it has a migration script. (9) If a build is documented, then it is not tagged. (9) is void if the build is obsolete. (7) is void if the build is not linted. (8) is void if the build is reverted. (3) is void if the build is not reverted. (1) is void if the build is not experimental. When (9) and (7) clash, (9) prevails. When (2) and (6) clash, (2) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (8) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Talc has a migration script?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007402", "pair_id": "u007402-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007402-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "26cff262323d4c34", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007402-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is documented. Talc is not experimental. Talc is linted. Talc is reverted. Obsidian is obsolete. Obsidian is documented. Obsidian is linted. Obsidian is reverted. Talc is not profiled.", "instruction": "(1) If a build has a migration script, then it is not flaky. (2) If a build is obsolete, then it is not localized. (3) If a build is not tagged, then it has no migration script. (4) If a build is reproducible, then it is notarized. (5) If a build is linted, then it is not notarized. (6) If a build is not profiled, then it is localized. (7) If a build is not experimental, then it is tagged. (8) If a build is not tagged, then it has a migration script. (9) If a build is documented, then it is not tagged. (9) is void if the build is obsolete. (7) is void if the build is not linted. (8) is void if the build is reverted. (3) is void if the build is not reverted. (1) is void if the build is not experimental. When (9) and (7) clash, (9) prevails. When (2) and (6) clash, (2) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (8) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Talc has a migration script?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007402", "pair_id": "u007402-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007402-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "72b9157d8940bd5e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007402-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is documented. Talc is not experimental. Talc is reverted. Obsidian is obsolete. Obsidian is documented. Obsidian is linted. Obsidian is reverted. Talc is not profiled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build has a migration script, it also is not flaky. Clause 2: once any build is obsolete, it also is not localized. Clause 3: once any build is not tagged, it also has no migration script. Clause 4: once any build is reproducible, it also is notarized. Clause 5: once any build is linted, it also is not notarized. Clause 6: once any build is not profiled, it also is localized. Clause 7: once any build is not experimental, it also is tagged. Clause 8: once any build is not tagged, it also has a migration script. Clause 9: once any build is documented, it also is not tagged. Clause 9 does not hold for a build when any build is obsolete. Clause 7 does not hold for a build when any build is not linted. Clause 8 does not hold for a build when any build is reverted. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build is not reverted. Clause 1 does not hold for a build when any build is not experimental. Clause 9 overrides Clause 7. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 4 overrides Clause 5. Clause 3 overrides Clause 8. Question: Does it follow that Talc has a migration script?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007402", "pair_id": "u007402-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007402-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "26cff262323d4c34", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007402-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is documented. Talc is not experimental. Talc is linted. Talc is reverted. Obsidian is obsolete. Obsidian is documented. Obsidian is linted. Obsidian is reverted. Talc is not profiled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build has a migration script, it also is not flaky. Clause 2: once any build is obsolete, it also is not localized. Clause 3: once any build is not tagged, it also has no migration script. Clause 4: once any build is reproducible, it also is notarized. Clause 5: once any build is linted, it also is not notarized. Clause 6: once any build is not profiled, it also is localized. Clause 7: once any build is not experimental, it also is tagged. Clause 8: once any build is not tagged, it also has a migration script. Clause 9: once any build is documented, it also is not tagged. Clause 9 does not hold for a build when any build is obsolete. Clause 7 does not hold for a build when any build is not linted. Clause 8 does not hold for a build when any build is reverted. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build is not reverted. Clause 1 does not hold for a build when any build is not experimental. Clause 9 overrides Clause 7. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 4 overrides Clause 5. Clause 3 overrides Clause 8. Question: Does it follow that Talc has a migration script?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007402", "pair_id": "u007402-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007402-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "72b9157d8940bd5e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007427-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not oversized. Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is sealed. Nandor is perishable. Ulla is not refrigerated. Nandor is labeled. Nandor is consolidated. Ulla is fragile. Nandor is refrigerated. Ulla is undeliverable. Ulla has a locker slot. Nandor has no locker slot. Ulla is consolidated.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is refrigerated and is consolidated, then it has a waybill. (2) If a parcel is sealed, then it is not weighed. (3) If a parcel has a locker slot and is not undeliverable, then it is damaged. (4) If a parcel is perishable, then it is weighed. (5) If a parcel is labeled, then it is hazardous. (6) If a parcel is refrigerated and is fragile and is consolidated, then it has no waybill. (6) is void if the parcel is labeled and is perishable. (6) is void if the parcel is perishable and is labeled. (5) is void if the parcel is sealed. When (4) and (2) clash, (4) prevails. When (6) and (1) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Ulla has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007427", "pair_id": "u007427-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007427-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ab9f26791c972313", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u007427-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not oversized. Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is sealed. Nandor is perishable. Ulla is not refrigerated. Nandor is labeled. Nandor is consolidated. Ulla is fragile. Nandor is refrigerated. Ulla is undeliverable. Ulla has a locker slot. Nandor has no locker slot. Ulla is consolidated.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is refrigerated and is consolidated, then it has a waybill. (2) If a parcel is sealed, then it is not weighed. (3) If a parcel has a locker slot and is undeliverable, then it is damaged. (4) If a parcel is perishable, then it is weighed. (5) If a parcel is labeled, then it is hazardous. (6) If a parcel is refrigerated and is fragile and is consolidated, then it has no waybill. (6) is void if the parcel is labeled and is perishable. (6) is void if the parcel is perishable and is labeled. (5) is void if the parcel is sealed. When (4) and (2) clash, (4) prevails. When (6) and (1) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Ulla has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007427", "pair_id": "u007427-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007427-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "69d4ecba1bd866c3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u007427-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not oversized. Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is sealed. Nandor is perishable. Ulla is not refrigerated. Nandor is labeled. Nandor is consolidated. Ulla is fragile. Nandor is refrigerated. Ulla is undeliverable. Ulla has a locker slot. Nandor has no locker slot. Ulla is consolidated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is refrigerated and also is consolidated, it also has a waybill. Clause 2: once any parcel is sealed, it also is not weighed. Clause 3: once any parcel has a locker slot and also is not undeliverable, it also is damaged. Clause 4: once any parcel is perishable, it also is weighed. Clause 5: once any parcel is labeled, it also is hazardous. Clause 6: once any parcel is refrigerated and also is fragile and also is consolidated, it also has no waybill. Clause 6 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is labeled and also is perishable. Clause 6 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is perishable and also is labeled. Clause 5 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is sealed. Clause 4 overrides Clause 2. Clause 6 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Ulla has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007427", "pair_id": "u007427-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007427-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ab9f26791c972313", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u007427-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not oversized. Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is sealed. Nandor is perishable. Ulla is not refrigerated. Nandor is labeled. Nandor is consolidated. Ulla is fragile. Nandor is refrigerated. Ulla is undeliverable. Ulla has a locker slot. Nandor has no locker slot. Ulla is consolidated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is refrigerated and also is consolidated, it also has a waybill. Clause 2: once any parcel is sealed, it also is not weighed. Clause 3: once any parcel has a locker slot and also is undeliverable, it also is damaged. Clause 4: once any parcel is perishable, it also is weighed. Clause 5: once any parcel is labeled, it also is hazardous. Clause 6: once any parcel is refrigerated and also is fragile and also is consolidated, it also has no waybill. Clause 6 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is labeled and also is perishable. Clause 6 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is perishable and also is labeled. Clause 5 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is sealed. Clause 4 overrides Clause 2. Clause 6 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Ulla has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007427", "pair_id": "u007427-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007427-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "69d4ecba1bd866c3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u007427-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not oversized. Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is sealed. Nandor is perishable. Ulla is not refrigerated. Nandor is labeled. Nandor is consolidated. Ulla is fragile. Nandor is refrigerated. Ulla is undeliverable. Ulla has a locker slot. Nandor has no locker slot. Ulla is consolidated.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is refrigerated, and is consolidated, that parcel has a waybill. Item B. When the parcel is sealed, that parcel is not weighed. Item C. When the parcel has a locker slot, and is not undeliverable, that parcel is damaged. Item D. When the parcel is perishable, that parcel is weighed. Item E. When the parcel is labeled, that parcel is hazardous. Item F. When the parcel is refrigerated, and is fragile, and is consolidated, that parcel has no waybill. Item F is suspended when the parcel is labeled, and is perishable. Item F is suspended when the parcel is perishable, and is labeled. Item E is suspended when the parcel is sealed. Item D outranks Item B. Item F outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Ulla has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007427", "pair_id": "u007427-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007427-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ab9f26791c972313", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u007427-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not oversized. Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is sealed. Nandor is perishable. Ulla is not refrigerated. Nandor is labeled. Nandor is consolidated. Ulla is fragile. Nandor is refrigerated. Ulla is undeliverable. Ulla has a locker slot. Nandor has no locker slot. Ulla is consolidated.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is refrigerated, and is consolidated, that parcel has a waybill. Item B. When the parcel is sealed, that parcel is not weighed. Item C. When the parcel has a locker slot, and is undeliverable, that parcel is damaged. Item D. When the parcel is perishable, that parcel is weighed. Item E. When the parcel is labeled, that parcel is hazardous. Item F. When the parcel is refrigerated, and is fragile, and is consolidated, that parcel has no waybill. Item F is suspended when the parcel is labeled, and is perishable. Item F is suspended when the parcel is perishable, and is labeled. Item E is suspended when the parcel is sealed. Item D outranks Item B. Item F outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Ulla has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007427", "pair_id": "u007427-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007427-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "69d4ecba1bd866c3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u007467-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is not registered. Nandor is tracked. Nandor has a weight class of 43. Nandor is not misrouted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is not labeled provided that it has a delivery window exceeding 39. Section 2: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is labeled. Section 3: a parcel is not damaged provided that it is oversized. Section 4: a parcel is not palletized provided that it is misrouted. Section 5: a parcel is damaged provided that it has a barcode. Section 6: a parcel is not undeliverable provided that it is tracked. Section 7: a parcel is oversized provided that it is not undeliverable. Section 8: a parcel is not oversized provided that it has a weight class of 63 or lower. Section 9: a parcel is labeled provided that it is tracked. Section 10: a parcel is undeliverable provided that it is not registered. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Nandor is damaged. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007467", "pair_id": "u007467-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007467-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "beb2428a156921d8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007467-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is not registered. Nandor is tracked. Nandor has a weight class of 43. Nandor is not misrouted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is not labeled provided that it has a delivery window exceeding 39. Section 2: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is labeled. Section 3: a parcel is not damaged provided that it is oversized. Section 4: a parcel is not palletized provided that it is misrouted. Section 5: a parcel is damaged provided that it has a barcode. Section 6: a parcel is not undeliverable provided that it is tracked. Section 7: a parcel is oversized provided that it is not undeliverable. Section 8: a parcel is not oversized provided that it has a weight class of 63 or lower. Section 9: a parcel is labeled provided that it is tracked. Section 10: a parcel is undeliverable provided that it is registered. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Nandor is damaged. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007467", "pair_id": "u007467-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007467-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "adbdc3b9efd79378", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007467-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is not registered. Nandor is tracked. Nandor has a weight class of 43. Nandor is not misrouted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window higher than 39: then it is not labeled. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is labeled: then it has a barcode. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is not damaged. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it is not palletized. Policy V. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is damaged. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is not undeliverable. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is not undeliverable: then it is oversized. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel has a weight class no higher than 63: then it is not oversized. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is labeled. Policy X. Suppose that parcel is not registered: then it is undeliverable. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy V. Question: Is it so that Nandor is damaged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007467", "pair_id": "u007467-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007467-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "beb2428a156921d8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007467-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is not registered. Nandor is tracked. Nandor has a weight class of 43. Nandor is not misrouted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window higher than 39: then it is not labeled. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is labeled: then it has a barcode. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is not damaged. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it is not palletized. Policy V. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is damaged. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is not undeliverable. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is not undeliverable: then it is oversized. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel has a weight class no higher than 63: then it is not oversized. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is labeled. Policy X. Suppose that parcel is registered: then it is undeliverable. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy V. Question: Is it so that Nandor is damaged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007467", "pair_id": "u007467-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007467-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "adbdc3b9efd79378", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007526-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not tested. Basalt is not reverted. Basalt is tested. Pumice is not benchmarked.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build has a migration script provided that it is benchmarked. Section 2: a build is not versioned provided that it is reproducible. Section 3: a build has a security advisory provided that it is reverted. Section 4: a build is reproducible provided that it has a security advisory. Section 5: a build is versioned provided that it has a feature toggle. Section 6: a build is obsolete provided that it is tested. Section 7: a build is flaky provided that it is tested. Section 8: a build is linted provided that it is benchmarked. Section 9: a build has a feature toggle provided that it is linted. Question: Pumice is versioned. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007526", "pair_id": "u007526-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007526-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "187ad3dd6e4f1ef3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007526-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is tested. Basalt is not reverted. Basalt is tested. Pumice is not benchmarked.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build has a migration script provided that it is benchmarked. Section 2: a build is not versioned provided that it is reproducible. Section 3: a build has a security advisory provided that it is reverted. Section 4: a build is reproducible provided that it has a security advisory. Section 5: a build is versioned provided that it has a feature toggle. Section 6: a build is obsolete provided that it is tested. Section 7: a build is flaky provided that it is tested. Section 8: a build is linted provided that it is benchmarked. Section 9: a build has a feature toggle provided that it is linted. Question: Pumice is versioned. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007526", "pair_id": "u007526-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007526-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "54e64351ad07d808", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007544-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is disputed. Yara is not subrogated. Yara is lapsed. Yara has an adjuster. Yara is litigated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has an adjuster, it then is not covered. #2 Each time a policyholder is disputed and additionally has a rider and additionally is subrogated, it then is a claimant. Question: Do the terms above show that Yara is a claimant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007544", "pair_id": "u007544-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007544-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "e308df4ad16ecb81", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007544-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is disputed. Yara is not subrogated. Yara is lapsed. Yara has an adjuster. Yara is litigated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has an adjuster, it then is not covered. #2 Each time a policyholder is disputed and additionally has a rider and additionally is subrogated, it then is a claimant. #3 Each time a policyholder is disputed and additionally is litigated and additionally is lapsed, it then is not a claimant. Question: Do the terms above show that Yara is a claimant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007544", "pair_id": "u007544-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007544-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "844716dd4b74828f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007551-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif is not discharged. Elif is not diabetic. Gunnar is anemic. Elif is not postoperative. Gunnar is not sedated. Gunnar is postoperative. Gunnar has no interpreter. Gunnar is bedridden. Gunnar is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is sedated, and is postoperative, and has an interpreter, that patient is not triaged. Item B. When the patient is triaged, and is bedridden, and is anemic, that patient is asthmatic. Item C. When the patient is discharged, that patient is allergic. Item D. When the patient is postoperative, that patient is triaged. Item E. When the patient is symptomatic, and has an interpreter, that patient is not allergic. Item F. When the patient is triaged, and is diabetic, and is postoperative, that patient is not asthmatic. Item A outranks Item D. Item C outranks Item E. Item F outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Gunnar is asthmatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007551", "pair_id": "u007551-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007551-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec5d8b9ff892ac3d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007551-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not discharged. Elif is not discharged. Elif is not diabetic. Gunnar is anemic. Elif is not postoperative. Gunnar is not sedated. Gunnar is postoperative. Gunnar has no interpreter. Gunnar is bedridden. Gunnar is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is sedated, and is postoperative, and has an interpreter, that patient is not triaged. Item B. When the patient is triaged, and is bedridden, and is anemic, that patient is asthmatic. Item C. When the patient is discharged, that patient is allergic. Item D. When the patient is postoperative, that patient is triaged. Item E. When the patient is symptomatic, and has an interpreter, that patient is not allergic. Item F. When the patient is triaged, and is diabetic, and is postoperative, that patient is not asthmatic. Item A outranks Item D. Item C outranks Item E. Item F outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Gunnar is asthmatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007551", "pair_id": "u007551-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007551-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "949d31d65ff94676", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007564-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is not sharded. Nimbus is not provisioned. Orrery is not provisioned. Nimbus is encrypted. Orrery is not encrypted. Orrery is not replicated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby has a public endpoint. Point B. If said workload has no dedicated host, it thereby is not virtualized. Point C. If said workload is not autoscaled, it thereby has no dedicated host. Point D. If said workload has no dedicated host, it thereby is virtualized. Point E. If said workload is not replicated, it thereby is autoscaled. Point F. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby has a failover node. Point F is cancelled if said workload is replicated. Point C is cancelled if said workload is sharded. Point A is cancelled if said workload is sharded. Point B is cancelled if said workload is not encrypted. Point D is cancelled if said workload is encrypted. Question: Statement: Orrery is virtualized. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007564", "pair_id": "u007564-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007564-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "57eb19070b2c89f8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007564-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is not sharded. Nimbus is not provisioned. Orrery is not provisioned. Nimbus is encrypted. Orrery is not encrypted. Orrery is not replicated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby has a public endpoint. Point B. If said workload has no dedicated host, it thereby is not virtualized. Point C. If said workload is autoscaled, it thereby has no dedicated host. Point D. If said workload has no dedicated host, it thereby is virtualized. Point E. If said workload is not replicated, it thereby is autoscaled. Point F. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby has a failover node. Point F is cancelled if said workload is replicated. Point C is cancelled if said workload is sharded. Point A is cancelled if said workload is sharded. Point B is cancelled if said workload is not encrypted. Point D is cancelled if said workload is encrypted. Question: Statement: Orrery is virtualized. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007564", "pair_id": "u007564-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007564-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c798cd8472838d36", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007564-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is not sharded. Nimbus is not provisioned. Orrery is not provisioned. Nimbus is encrypted. Orrery is not encrypted. Orrery is not replicated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is provisioned, so it has a public endpoint. No. 2 While the given workload has no dedicated host, so it is not virtualized. No. 3 While the given workload is not autoscaled, so it has no dedicated host. No. 4 While the given workload has no dedicated host, so it is virtualized. No. 5 While the given workload is not replicated, so it is autoscaled. No. 6 While the given workload is provisioned, so it has a failover node. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given workload is replicated. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload is sharded. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload is sharded. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given workload is not encrypted. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload is encrypted. Question: Is the claim \"Orrery is virtualized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007564", "pair_id": "u007564-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007564-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "57eb19070b2c89f8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007564-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is not sharded. Nimbus is not provisioned. Orrery is not provisioned. Nimbus is encrypted. Orrery is not encrypted. Orrery is not replicated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is provisioned, so it has a public endpoint. No. 2 While the given workload has no dedicated host, so it is not virtualized. No. 3 While the given workload is autoscaled, so it has no dedicated host. No. 4 While the given workload has no dedicated host, so it is virtualized. No. 5 While the given workload is not replicated, so it is autoscaled. No. 6 While the given workload is provisioned, so it has a failover node. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given workload is replicated. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload is sharded. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload is sharded. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given workload is not encrypted. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload is encrypted. Question: Is the claim \"Orrery is virtualized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007564", "pair_id": "u007564-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007564-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c798cd8472838d36", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007574-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is vaccinated. Dorian is sedated. Dorian is not referred. Dorian is not contagious. Dorian has no pacemaker. Dorian is not anemic. Dorian has a caregiver. Dorian is fasting. Dorian is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is triaged and additionally is not referred and additionally is fasting, it then is not ambulatory. #2 Each time a patient is sedated, it then is admitted. #3 Each time a patient has a pacemaker, it then is not bedridden. #4 Each time a patient is fasting, it then is triaged. #5 Each time a patient is vaccinated, it then is not admitted. #6 Each time a patient is ambulatory, it then is bedridden. #7 Each time a patient is ambulatory and additionally is anemic, it then is not pregnant. #8 Each time a patient is triaged and additionally is fasting and additionally is contagious, it then is ambulatory. #8 is set aside if a patient is symptomatic and additionally has a caregiver. #6 is set aside if a patient is symptomatic. #7 is set aside if a patient is symptomatic. #4 is set aside if a patient has a pacemaker and additionally is vaccinated. #2 is set aside if a patient is symptomatic. #6 yields to #3. #8 yields to #1. #5 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Dorian is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007574", "pair_id": "u007574-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007574-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "10f7520815567caf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u007574-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is vaccinated. Dorian is sedated. Dorian is not referred. Dorian is not contagious. Dorian has no pacemaker. Dorian is not anemic. Dorian has a caregiver. Dorian is fasting. Dorian is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is triaged and additionally is referred and additionally is fasting, it then is not ambulatory. #2 Each time a patient is sedated, it then is admitted. #3 Each time a patient has a pacemaker, it then is not bedridden. #4 Each time a patient is fasting, it then is triaged. #5 Each time a patient is vaccinated, it then is not admitted. #6 Each time a patient is ambulatory, it then is bedridden. #7 Each time a patient is ambulatory and additionally is anemic, it then is not pregnant. #8 Each time a patient is triaged and additionally is fasting and additionally is contagious, it then is ambulatory. #8 is set aside if a patient is symptomatic and additionally has a caregiver. #6 is set aside if a patient is symptomatic. #7 is set aside if a patient is symptomatic. #4 is set aside if a patient has a pacemaker and additionally is vaccinated. #2 is set aside if a patient is symptomatic. #6 yields to #3. #8 yields to #1. #5 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Dorian is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007574", "pair_id": "u007574-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007574-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9af61f95f27983e2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u007579-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aldebaran is resubmitted. Aldebaran is multicenter. Aldebaran has no ethics clearance. Aldebaran is cofunded. Aldebaran is not a pilot study. Aldebaran is budgeted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is cofunded, thus it is translational. Provision 2: when the proposal here is resubmitted while is budgeted, thus it has no industry backing. Provision 3: when the proposal here is a pilot study while is not cofunded, thus it is renewed. Provision 4: when the proposal here has no industry backing while has ethics clearance while is multicenter, thus it is interdisciplinary. Provision 5: when the proposal here has no industry backing while has no ethics clearance, thus it is not interdisciplinary. Question: Would it be right to say that Aldebaran is interdisciplinary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007579", "pair_id": "u007579-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007579-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "e6fdb4cc0b95f2fc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u007579-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aldebaran is resubmitted. Aldebaran is multicenter. Aldebaran has no ethics clearance. Aldebaran is not cofunded. Aldebaran is not a pilot study. Aldebaran is budgeted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is cofunded, thus it is translational. Provision 2: when the proposal here is resubmitted while is budgeted, thus it has no industry backing. Provision 3: when the proposal here is a pilot study while is not cofunded, thus it is renewed. Provision 4: when the proposal here has no industry backing while has ethics clearance while is multicenter, thus it is interdisciplinary. Provision 5: when the proposal here has no industry backing while has no ethics clearance, thus it is not interdisciplinary. Question: Would it be right to say that Aldebaran is interdisciplinary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007579", "pair_id": "u007579-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007579-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "93cf55c351df03b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u007579-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aldebaran is resubmitted. Aldebaran is multicenter. Aldebaran has no ethics clearance. Aldebaran is cofunded. Aldebaran is not a pilot study. Aldebaran is budgeted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is cofunded, it thereby is translational. Point B. If said proposal is resubmitted and further is budgeted, it thereby has no industry backing. Point C. If said proposal is a pilot study and further is not cofunded, it thereby is renewed. Point D. If said proposal has no industry backing and further has ethics clearance and further is multicenter, it thereby is interdisciplinary. Point E. If said proposal has no industry backing and further has no ethics clearance, it thereby is not interdisciplinary. Question: Statement: Aldebaran is interdisciplinary. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007579", "pair_id": "u007579-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007579-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "e6fdb4cc0b95f2fc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u007579-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aldebaran is resubmitted. Aldebaran is multicenter. Aldebaran has no ethics clearance. Aldebaran is not cofunded. Aldebaran is not a pilot study. Aldebaran is budgeted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is cofunded, it thereby is translational. Point B. If said proposal is resubmitted and further is budgeted, it thereby has no industry backing. Point C. If said proposal is a pilot study and further is not cofunded, it thereby is renewed. Point D. If said proposal has no industry backing and further has ethics clearance and further is multicenter, it thereby is interdisciplinary. Point E. If said proposal has no industry backing and further has no ethics clearance, it thereby is not interdisciplinary. Question: Statement: Aldebaran is interdisciplinary. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007579", "pair_id": "u007579-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007579-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "93cf55c351df03b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u007616-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hamid has no escrow account. Hamid is not prequalified. Hamid is not foreclosed. Anouk is not prequalified. Anouk has no escrow account. Anouk is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is not prequalified, thus it is not overdrawn. Provision 2: when the borrower here has an escrow account, thus it is solvent. Provision 3: when the borrower here is not overdrawn while is foreclosed, thus it is delinquent. Provision 4: when the borrower here is not overdrawn while is not foreclosed while is not prequalified, thus it is not delinquent. Question: Would it be right to say that Anouk is delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007616", "pair_id": "u007616-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007616-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "55a867df43e771c5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007616-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hamid has no escrow account. Hamid is not prequalified. Hamid is not foreclosed. Anouk is not prequalified. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is not prequalified, thus it is not overdrawn. Provision 2: when the borrower here has an escrow account, thus it is solvent. Provision 3: when the borrower here is not overdrawn while is foreclosed, thus it is delinquent. Provision 4: when the borrower here is not overdrawn while is not foreclosed while is not prequalified, thus it is not delinquent. Question: Would it be right to say that Anouk is delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007616", "pair_id": "u007616-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007616-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "c3b5676adbce78b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007616-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hamid has no escrow account. Hamid is not prequalified. Hamid is not foreclosed. Anouk is not prequalified. Anouk has no escrow account. Anouk is foreclosed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is not prequalified, so it is not overdrawn. No. 2 While the given borrower has an escrow account, so it is solvent. No. 3 While the given borrower is not overdrawn and likewise is foreclosed, so it is delinquent. No. 4 While the given borrower is not overdrawn and likewise is not foreclosed and likewise is not prequalified, so it is not delinquent. Question: Is the claim \"Anouk is delinquent\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007616", "pair_id": "u007616-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007616-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "55a867df43e771c5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007616-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hamid has no escrow account. Hamid is not prequalified. Hamid is not foreclosed. Anouk is not prequalified. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk is foreclosed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is not prequalified, so it is not overdrawn. No. 2 While the given borrower has an escrow account, so it is solvent. No. 3 While the given borrower is not overdrawn and likewise is foreclosed, so it is delinquent. No. 4 While the given borrower is not overdrawn and likewise is not foreclosed and likewise is not prequalified, so it is not delinquent. Question: Is the claim \"Anouk is delinquent\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007616", "pair_id": "u007616-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007616-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "c3b5676adbce78b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007627-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda has no rider. Wanda has no dashcam. Edda is indemnified. Edda is not reimbursed. Xaver has no premium discount. Dmitri is indemnified. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Dmitri has no beneficiary. Wanda has a beneficiary. Wanda is not reimbursed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has a beneficiary, it then is appraised. #2 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then has no adjuster. #3 Each time a policyholder is not reimbursed, it then is not appraised. #4 Each time a policyholder is not reimbursed and additionally has no dashcam and additionally is indemnified, it then is not reinstated. #5 Each time a policyholder has a deductible waiver and additionally has no rider, it then has an adjuster. #2 yields to #5. #1 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Edda has a premium discount?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007627", "pair_id": "u007627-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007627-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0b2e9d87d0280390", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007627-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda has no rider. Wanda has no dashcam. Edda is indemnified. Edda has no beneficiary. Edda is not reimbursed. Xaver has no premium discount. Dmitri is indemnified. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Dmitri has no beneficiary. Wanda has a beneficiary. Wanda is not reimbursed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has a beneficiary, it then is appraised. #2 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then has no adjuster. #3 Each time a policyholder is not reimbursed, it then is not appraised. #4 Each time a policyholder is not reimbursed and additionally has no dashcam and additionally is indemnified, it then is not reinstated. #5 Each time a policyholder has a deductible waiver and additionally has no rider, it then has an adjuster. #2 yields to #5. #1 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Edda has a premium discount?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007627", "pair_id": "u007627-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007627-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "233d91b8d9b25911", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007641-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver has a beneficiary. Fabian has no premium discount. Fabian has a beneficiary. Fabian has no adjuster.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is not inspected, so it has roadside assistance. No. 2 While the given policyholder has no premium discount, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 3 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is covered. No. 4 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is reimbursed. No. 5 While the given policyholder is covered, so it is not inspected. No. 6 While the given policyholder is not inspected, so it has no roadside assistance. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has no beneficiary. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a beneficiary. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has no beneficiary. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has no adjuster. Question: Is the claim \"Fabian has no roadside assistance\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007641", "pair_id": "u007641-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007641-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bc72ac6285d73138", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007641-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver has a beneficiary. Fabian has a premium discount. Fabian has a beneficiary. Fabian has no adjuster.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is not inspected, so it has roadside assistance. No. 2 While the given policyholder has no premium discount, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 3 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is covered. No. 4 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is reimbursed. No. 5 While the given policyholder is covered, so it is not inspected. No. 6 While the given policyholder is not inspected, so it has no roadside assistance. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has no beneficiary. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a beneficiary. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has no beneficiary. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has no adjuster. Question: Is the claim \"Fabian has no roadside assistance\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007641", "pair_id": "u007641-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007641-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c34004f2ff9596dc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007657-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny is garnished. Dagny has a repayment grade of 47. Corin is not delinquent.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is not delinquent, then it has a cosigner. (2) If a borrower has a repayment grade above 51, then it is not a homeowner. Question: Is it true that Dagny is not solvent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007657", "pair_id": "u007657-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007657-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1468a271c2f9cde9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u007657-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny is garnished. Dagny has a repayment grade of 47. Dagny is solvent. Corin is not delinquent.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is not delinquent, then it has a cosigner. (2) If a borrower has a repayment grade above 51, then it is not a homeowner. Question: Is it true that Dagny is not solvent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007657", "pair_id": "u007657-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007657-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "03dcec7735edb1c0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u007704-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk is overdrawn. Anouk has a risk tier of 56. Anouk has a repayment grade of 32.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has no mortgage, it then is delinquent. #2 Each time a borrower has a risk tier greater than 51, it then is not pensioned. #3 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is solvent. #4 Each time a borrower is underwritten, it then is prequalified. #5 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is pensioned. #6 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is not solvent. #7 Each time a borrower is vetted, it then has no mortgage. #8 Each time a borrower has a repayment grade greater than 31, it then is vetted. #9 Each time a borrower is prequalified, it then is refinanced. #10 Each time a borrower has a risk tier of 63 or above, it then has a mortgage. #11 Each time a borrower has a repayment grade of 31 or below, it then is underwritten. #3 yields to #6. #2 yields to #5. #7 yields to #10. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Anouk?", "options": ["is delinquent", "is refinanced"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is delinquent", "unit_id": "u007704", "pair_id": "u007704-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007704-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1e70bde8706049f1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a6"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u007704-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk is overdrawn. Anouk has a risk tier of 56. Anouk has a repayment grade of 24.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has no mortgage, it then is delinquent. #2 Each time a borrower has a risk tier greater than 51, it then is not pensioned. #3 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is solvent. #4 Each time a borrower is underwritten, it then is prequalified. #5 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is pensioned. #6 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is not solvent. #7 Each time a borrower is vetted, it then has no mortgage. #8 Each time a borrower has a repayment grade greater than 31, it then is vetted. #9 Each time a borrower is prequalified, it then is refinanced. #10 Each time a borrower has a risk tier of 63 or above, it then has a mortgage. #11 Each time a borrower has a repayment grade of 31 or below, it then is underwritten. #3 yields to #6. #2 yields to #5. #7 yields to #10. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Anouk?", "options": ["is delinquent", "is refinanced"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is refinanced", "unit_id": "u007704", "pair_id": "u007704-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007704-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4a2a950555bdecad", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a6"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u007747-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is idle. Vesper is idle. Sierra has a public endpoint. Vesper is not containerized. Halcyon is not idle. Halcyon is containerized. Sierra is not containerized.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is isolated, then it is provisioned. (2) If a workload is stateless, then it is not provisioned. (3) If a workload is containerized, then it is sharded. (4) If a workload is containerized, then it is stateless. (5) If a workload has a public endpoint, then it is throttled. (6) If a workload is idle, then it has a firewall. Question: Is it true that Sierra is provisioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007747", "pair_id": "u007747-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007747-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "422cd7e1f0ad4513", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007747-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is idle. Vesper is idle. Sierra has a public endpoint. Vesper is not containerized. Halcyon is not idle. Halcyon is containerized. Sierra is not containerized.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is isolated, then it is provisioned. (2) If a workload has a public endpoint, then it is isolated. (3) If a workload is stateless, then it is not provisioned. (4) If a workload is containerized, then it is sharded. (5) If a workload is containerized, then it is stateless. (6) If a workload has a public endpoint, then it is throttled. (7) If a workload is idle, then it has a firewall. Question: Is it true that Sierra is provisioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007747", "pair_id": "u007747-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007747-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "bb57326d42f014ac", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007747-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is idle. Vesper is idle. Sierra has a public endpoint. Vesper is not containerized. Halcyon is not idle. Halcyon is containerized. Sierra is not containerized.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is isolated, it also is provisioned. Clause 2: once any workload is stateless, it also is not provisioned. Clause 3: once any workload is containerized, it also is sharded. Clause 4: once any workload is containerized, it also is stateless. Clause 5: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is throttled. Clause 6: once any workload is idle, it also has a firewall. Question: Does it follow that Sierra is provisioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007747", "pair_id": "u007747-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007747-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "422cd7e1f0ad4513", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007747-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is idle. Vesper is idle. Sierra has a public endpoint. Vesper is not containerized. Halcyon is not idle. Halcyon is containerized. Sierra is not containerized.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is isolated, it also is provisioned. Clause 2: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is isolated. Clause 3: once any workload is stateless, it also is not provisioned. Clause 4: once any workload is containerized, it also is sharded. Clause 5: once any workload is containerized, it also is stateless. Clause 6: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is throttled. Clause 7: once any workload is idle, it also has a firewall. Question: Does it follow that Sierra is provisioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007747", "pair_id": "u007747-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007747-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "bb57326d42f014ac", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007747-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is idle. Vesper is idle. Sierra has a public endpoint. Vesper is not containerized. Halcyon is not idle. Halcyon is containerized. Sierra is not containerized.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is isolated, that workload is provisioned. Item B. When the workload is stateless, that workload is not provisioned. Item C. When the workload is containerized, that workload is sharded. Item D. When the workload is containerized, that workload is stateless. Item E. When the workload has a public endpoint, that workload is throttled. Item F. When the workload is idle, that workload has a firewall. Question: Can one infer that Sierra is provisioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007747", "pair_id": "u007747-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007747-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "422cd7e1f0ad4513", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007747-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is idle. Vesper is idle. Sierra has a public endpoint. Vesper is not containerized. Halcyon is not idle. Halcyon is containerized. Sierra is not containerized.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is isolated, that workload is provisioned. Item B. When the workload has a public endpoint, that workload is isolated. Item C. When the workload is stateless, that workload is not provisioned. Item D. When the workload is containerized, that workload is sharded. Item E. When the workload is containerized, that workload is stateless. Item F. When the workload has a public endpoint, that workload is throttled. Item G. When the workload is idle, that workload has a firewall. Question: Can one infer that Sierra is provisioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007747", "pair_id": "u007747-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007747-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "bb57326d42f014ac", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007763-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xaver is covered. Xaver is a claimant. Xaver is not grandfathered. Xaver is a smoker. Xaver is not retired. Xaver has a payout ceiling of 59. Xaver has a premium band of 71. Xaver has a beneficiary. Xaver has a peril factor of 39. Xaver is not subrogated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed plus has a premium band higher than 37 plus is retired: then it has an adjuster. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is covered plus is a smoker: then it is lapsed. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is subrogated: then it is not disputed. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed plus has a claim frequency smaller than 58: then it has roadside assistance. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed plus has a payout ceiling no higher than 25: then it is uninsurable. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed plus is disputed plus has a premium band no lower than 51: then it is inspected. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder is litigated: then it has no rider. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder is disputed: then it is not bundled. Policy IX. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed plus is a claimant: then it is bundled. Policy X. Suppose that policyholder has a peril factor smaller than 40: then it is disputed. Policy XI. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed plus has a premium band no higher than 37 plus is reinstated: then it has flood coverage. Policy III is waived if that policyholder has a beneficiary. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy IX. Question: Which choice is right for Xaver?", "options": ["has flood coverage", "has roadside assistance", "is inspected", "is bundled", "has an adjuster", "is uninsurable"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is inspected", "unit_id": "u007763", "pair_id": "u007763-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007763-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d7a0be92fb9c3c14", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a10", "a14", "a12", "a20", "a8"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u007763-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xaver is covered. Xaver is a claimant. Xaver is not grandfathered. Xaver is a smoker. Xaver is not retired. Xaver has a payout ceiling of 59. Xaver has a premium band of 71. Xaver has a beneficiary. Xaver has a peril factor of 39. Xaver is not subrogated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed plus has a premium band higher than 37 plus is retired: then it has an adjuster. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is covered plus is a smoker: then it is lapsed. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is subrogated: then it is not disputed. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed plus has a claim frequency smaller than 58: then it has roadside assistance. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed plus has a payout ceiling no higher than 25: then it is uninsurable. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed plus is disputed plus has a premium band no lower than 51: then it is inspected. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder is litigated: then it has no rider. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder is disputed: then it is not bundled. Policy IX. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed plus is a claimant: then it is bundled. Policy X. Suppose that policyholder has a peril factor smaller than 34: then it is disputed. Policy XI. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed plus has a premium band no higher than 37 plus is reinstated: then it has flood coverage. Policy III is waived if that policyholder has a beneficiary. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy IX. Question: Which choice is right for Xaver?", "options": ["has flood coverage", "has roadside assistance", "is inspected", "is bundled", "has an adjuster", "is uninsurable"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is bundled", "unit_id": "u007763", "pair_id": "u007763-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007763-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "faf4484a749ca0e6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a10", "a14", "a12", "a20", "a8"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u007778-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira has a patent filing. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Aldebaran is not theoretical. Aldebaran is peer reviewed. Aldebaran is endorsed. Aldebaran is not collaborative. Nashira is endorsed. Aldebaran is not cofunded. Aldebaran has a patent filing. Aldebaran is renewed. Nashira is collaborative.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is theoretical, thus it is interdisciplinary. Provision 2: when the proposal here is preregistered while has a patent filing, thus it is embargoed. Provision 3: when the proposal here is preregistered while has a patent filing while is collaborative, thus it is not embargoed. Provision 4: when the proposal here is cofunded, thus it is shortlisted. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here is multicenter while is renewed. Provision 1 has no effect when the proposal here is renewed. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here is renewed. Provision 3 has no effect when the proposal here is endorsed while is peer reviewed. Question: Would it be right to say that Aldebaran is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007778", "pair_id": "u007778-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007778-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4446c797676be960", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007778-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira has a patent filing. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Aldebaran is not theoretical. Aldebaran is preregistered. Aldebaran is peer reviewed. Aldebaran is endorsed. Aldebaran is not collaborative. Nashira is endorsed. Aldebaran is not cofunded. Aldebaran has a patent filing. Aldebaran is renewed. Nashira is collaborative.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is theoretical, thus it is interdisciplinary. Provision 2: when the proposal here is preregistered while has a patent filing, thus it is embargoed. Provision 3: when the proposal here is preregistered while has a patent filing while is collaborative, thus it is not embargoed. Provision 4: when the proposal here is cofunded, thus it is shortlisted. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here is multicenter while is renewed. Provision 1 has no effect when the proposal here is renewed. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here is renewed. Provision 3 has no effect when the proposal here is endorsed while is peer reviewed. Question: Would it be right to say that Aldebaran is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007778", "pair_id": "u007778-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007778-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a8f85b1269cbdded", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007778-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira has a patent filing. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Aldebaran is not theoretical. Aldebaran is peer reviewed. Aldebaran is endorsed. Aldebaran is not collaborative. Nashira is endorsed. Aldebaran is not cofunded. Aldebaran has a patent filing. Aldebaran is renewed. Nashira is collaborative.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is theoretical, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 2 While the given proposal is preregistered and likewise has a patent filing, so it is embargoed. No. 3 While the given proposal is preregistered and likewise has a patent filing and likewise is collaborative, so it is not embargoed. No. 4 While the given proposal is cofunded, so it is shortlisted. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given proposal is multicenter and likewise is renewed. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal is renewed. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal is renewed. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given proposal is endorsed and likewise is peer reviewed. Question: Is the claim \"Aldebaran is embargoed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007778", "pair_id": "u007778-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007778-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4446c797676be960", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007778-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira has a patent filing. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Aldebaran is not theoretical. Aldebaran is preregistered. Aldebaran is peer reviewed. Aldebaran is endorsed. Aldebaran is not collaborative. Nashira is endorsed. Aldebaran is not cofunded. Aldebaran has a patent filing. Aldebaran is renewed. Nashira is collaborative.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is theoretical, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 2 While the given proposal is preregistered and likewise has a patent filing, so it is embargoed. No. 3 While the given proposal is preregistered and likewise has a patent filing and likewise is collaborative, so it is not embargoed. No. 4 While the given proposal is cofunded, so it is shortlisted. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given proposal is multicenter and likewise is renewed. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal is renewed. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal is renewed. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given proposal is endorsed and likewise is peer reviewed. Question: Is the claim \"Aldebaran is embargoed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007778", "pair_id": "u007778-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007778-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a8f85b1269cbdded", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u007793-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is employed. Evren has no guarantor. Anouk has a guarantor. Anouk is not employed. Anouk is prequalified. Evren is not prequalified.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has no guarantor, it then is foreclosed. #2 Each time a borrower is not employed, it then is not foreclosed. #3 Each time a borrower is prequalified, it then is overdrawn. Question: Do the terms above show that Evren is not foreclosed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007793", "pair_id": "u007793-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007793-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "b127bdeb663a02ef", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u007793-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is employed. Evren has no guarantor. Anouk has a guarantor. Anouk is not employed. Anouk is prequalified. Evren is not prequalified.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is employed, it then has no collateral. #2 Each time a borrower has no guarantor, it then is foreclosed. #3 Each time a borrower is not employed, it then is not foreclosed. #4 Each time a borrower is prequalified, it then is overdrawn. Question: Do the terms above show that Evren is not foreclosed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007793", "pair_id": "u007793-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007793-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "f2267e116458a652", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u007795-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is provisioned. Zephyr has a public endpoint. Zephyr is mirrored. Zephyr has a dedicated host. Zephyr is not patched.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is backed up provided that it is mirrored. Section 2: a workload is not backed up provided that it has no dedicated host. Section 3: a workload is not isolated provided that it is provisioned as well as is not patched as well as has a public endpoint. Section 4: a workload is not deprecated provided that it is not provisioned. Section 5: a workload is isolated provided that it is provisioned as well as is not patched as well as has a public endpoint. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Zephyr is isolated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007795", "pair_id": "u007795-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007795-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9ad9d6bb883413ac", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007795-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is provisioned. Zephyr has a public endpoint. Zephyr is mirrored. Zephyr has a dedicated host. Zephyr is not patched.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is backed up provided that it is mirrored. Section 2: a workload is not backed up provided that it has no dedicated host. Section 3: a workload is not isolated provided that it is provisioned as well as is not patched as well as has a public endpoint. Section 4: a workload is not deprecated provided that it is not provisioned. Section 5: a workload is isolated provided that it is provisioned as well as is patched as well as has a public endpoint. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Zephyr is isolated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007795", "pair_id": "u007795-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007795-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7569576fdf3365b5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007795-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is provisioned. Zephyr has a public endpoint. Zephyr is mirrored. Zephyr has a dedicated host. Zephyr is not patched.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is mirrored: then it is backed up. Policy II. Suppose that workload has no dedicated host: then it is not backed up. Policy III. Suppose that workload is provisioned plus is not patched plus has a public endpoint: then it is not isolated. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is not provisioned: then it is not deprecated. Policy V. Suppose that workload is provisioned plus is not patched plus has a public endpoint: then it is isolated. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Zephyr is isolated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007795", "pair_id": "u007795-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007795-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9ad9d6bb883413ac", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007795-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is provisioned. Zephyr has a public endpoint. Zephyr is mirrored. Zephyr has a dedicated host. Zephyr is not patched.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is mirrored: then it is backed up. Policy II. Suppose that workload has no dedicated host: then it is not backed up. Policy III. Suppose that workload is provisioned plus is not patched plus has a public endpoint: then it is not isolated. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is not provisioned: then it is not deprecated. Policy V. Suppose that workload is provisioned plus is patched plus has a public endpoint: then it is isolated. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Zephyr is isolated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007795", "pair_id": "u007795-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007795-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7569576fdf3365b5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007824-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is undeliverable. Priya is not refrigerated. Nandor is hazardous. Nandor is not undeliverable. Priya is palletized. Saskia is refrigerated. Saskia is hazardous. Priya is hazardous.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is palletized, that parcel has a courier. Item B. When the parcel has a waybill, and is not undeliverable, and is hazardous, that parcel is not consolidated. Item C. When the parcel has a courier, that parcel has a waybill. Item D. When the parcel has a waybill, and is undeliverable, and is palletized, that parcel is consolidated. Item E. When the parcel is not refrigerated, that parcel is not oversized. Item F. When the parcel is not fragile, and is not palletized, that parcel has no courier. Item E is suspended when the parcel is undeliverable. Item C is suspended when the parcel is fragile, and is not hazardous. Item F outranks Item A. Item D outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Priya is consolidated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007824", "pair_id": "u007824-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007824-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cc4652bd1c79d7b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u007824-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is undeliverable. Priya is not refrigerated. Nandor is hazardous. Priya is undeliverable. Nandor is not undeliverable. Priya is palletized. Saskia is refrigerated. Saskia is hazardous. Priya is hazardous.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is palletized, that parcel has a courier. Item B. When the parcel has a waybill, and is not undeliverable, and is hazardous, that parcel is not consolidated. Item C. When the parcel has a courier, that parcel has a waybill. Item D. When the parcel has a waybill, and is undeliverable, and is palletized, that parcel is consolidated. Item E. When the parcel is not refrigerated, that parcel is not oversized. Item F. When the parcel is not fragile, and is not palletized, that parcel has no courier. Item E is suspended when the parcel is undeliverable. Item C is suspended when the parcel is fragile, and is not hazardous. Item F outranks Item A. Item D outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Priya is consolidated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007824", "pair_id": "u007824-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007824-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7e0e77a53f5a6dbd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u007835-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Talc is documented. Obsidian has a security advisory. Talc is not tested. Feldspar is not compiled. Feldspar is documented. Obsidian is not documented. Obsidian is not reproducible. Gneiss is backported. Obsidian is flaky. Obsidian is compiled. Gneiss is not compiled. Obsidian is not signed. Feldspar is not backported. Talc is not flaky. Feldspar is versioned. Feldspar is not flaky. Feldspar is reproducible. Gneiss is not versioned. Feldspar is merged. Feldspar is tested. Gneiss is flaky. Obsidian is not merged. Talc is not linted. Feldspar has a changelog. Feldspar is linted. Gneiss is tested. Feldspar has a security advisory.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a security advisory and additionally is merged and additionally is not backported, it then has a feature toggle. #2 Each time a build has a migration script and additionally has a security advisory, it then is localized. #3 Each time a build is flaky, it then is profiled. #4 Each time a build has a migration script and additionally is linted and additionally is experimental, it then is notarized. #5 Each time a build is minified, it then is not fuzzed. #6 Each time a build has a migration script and additionally is minified and additionally is not merged, it then is reverted. #7 Each time a build is not documented, it then is minified. #8 Each time a build is reproducible, it then has a migration script. #9 Each time a build is compiled and additionally is tested, it then is benchmarked. #10 Each time a build has a migration script and additionally is signed, it then is fuzzed. #11 Each time a build is versioned and additionally is not flaky, it then is experimental. #12 Each time a build has a security advisory, it then is not notarized. #13 Each time a build is merged, it then is not profiled. #4 yields to #12. #10 yields to #5. #13 yields to #3. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Feldspar?", "options": ["is reverted", "is localized", "is notarized", "is fuzzed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is localized", "unit_id": "u007835", "pair_id": "u007835-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/26/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007835-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c8a3107232025b6e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a14", "a0", "a4", "a16"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007835-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Talc is documented. Obsidian has a security advisory. Talc is not tested. Feldspar is not compiled. Feldspar is documented. Obsidian is not documented. Obsidian is not reproducible. Gneiss is backported. Obsidian is flaky. Obsidian is compiled. Gneiss is not compiled. Obsidian is not signed. Feldspar is not backported. Talc is not flaky. Feldspar is versioned. Feldspar is not flaky. Feldspar is reproducible. Gneiss is not versioned. Feldspar is merged. Feldspar is tested. Gneiss is flaky. Obsidian is not merged. Talc is not linted. Feldspar has a changelog. Feldspar is linted. Gneiss is tested. Feldspar has no security advisory.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a security advisory and additionally is merged and additionally is not backported, it then has a feature toggle. #2 Each time a build has a migration script and additionally has a security advisory, it then is localized. #3 Each time a build is flaky, it then is profiled. #4 Each time a build has a migration script and additionally is linted and additionally is experimental, it then is notarized. #5 Each time a build is minified, it then is not fuzzed. #6 Each time a build has a migration script and additionally is minified and additionally is not merged, it then is reverted. #7 Each time a build is not documented, it then is minified. #8 Each time a build is reproducible, it then has a migration script. #9 Each time a build is compiled and additionally is tested, it then is benchmarked. #10 Each time a build has a migration script and additionally is signed, it then is fuzzed. #11 Each time a build is versioned and additionally is not flaky, it then is experimental. #12 Each time a build has a security advisory, it then is not notarized. #13 Each time a build is merged, it then is not profiled. #4 yields to #12. #10 yields to #5. #13 yields to #3. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Feldspar?", "options": ["is reverted", "is localized", "is notarized", "is fuzzed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is notarized", "unit_id": "u007835", "pair_id": "u007835-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/26/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007835-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d74c00e129d187e5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a14", "a0", "a4", "a16"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007844-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper is not idle. Vesper is throttled. Borealis is not throttled. Borealis has a memory allotment of 32.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload has a memory allotment higher than 31: then it is not patched. Policy II. Suppose that workload is idle: then it is containerized. Policy III. Suppose that workload is patched: then it is not containerized. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is throttled: then it is backed up. Policy V. Suppose that workload is idle: then it is patched. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Borealis is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007844", "pair_id": "u007844-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007844-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8a88b92142f166d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007844-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper is not idle. Vesper is throttled. Borealis is not throttled. Borealis has a memory allotment of 46.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload has a memory allotment higher than 31: then it is not patched. Policy II. Suppose that workload is idle: then it is containerized. Policy III. Suppose that workload is patched: then it is not containerized. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is throttled: then it is backed up. Policy V. Suppose that workload is idle: then it is patched. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Borealis is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007844", "pair_id": "u007844-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007844-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "de58f05fdbf19a6f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007844-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper is not idle. Vesper is throttled. Borealis is not throttled. Borealis has a memory allotment of 32.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload has a memory allotment greater than 31, it then is not patched. #2 Each time a workload is idle, it then is containerized. #3 Each time a workload is patched, it then is not containerized. #4 Each time a workload is throttled, it then is backed up. #5 Each time a workload is idle, it then is patched. #2 yields to #3. #1 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Borealis is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007844", "pair_id": "u007844-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007844-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8a88b92142f166d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007844-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper is not idle. Vesper is throttled. Borealis is not throttled. Borealis has a memory allotment of 46.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload has a memory allotment greater than 31, it then is not patched. #2 Each time a workload is idle, it then is containerized. #3 Each time a workload is patched, it then is not containerized. #4 Each time a workload is throttled, it then is backed up. #5 Each time a workload is idle, it then is patched. #2 yields to #3. #1 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Borealis is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007844", "pair_id": "u007844-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007844-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "de58f05fdbf19a6f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007848-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno has a latency budget of 86. Juno is autoscaled. Juno is not stateless. Juno is not deprecated. Juno is throttled.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is not throttled, that workload has a public endpoint. Item B. When the workload has a latency budget of no more than 82, that workload has no public endpoint. Item C. When the workload is provisioned, that workload is containerized. Item D. When the workload is throttled, that workload is provisioned. Item E. When the workload is provisioned, that workload is not containerized. Item E is suspended when the workload is autoscaled. Item E is suspended when the workload is not stateless. Item C is suspended when the workload is stateless. Item B is suspended when the workload is throttled. Item E outranks Item C. Item A outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Juno is containerized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007848", "pair_id": "u007848-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007848-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b2d17592500920d0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007848-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno has a latency budget of 86. Juno is autoscaled. Juno is not stateless. Juno is not deprecated. Juno is throttled.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is not throttled, that workload has a public endpoint. Item B. When the workload has a latency budget of no more than 82, that workload has no public endpoint. Item C. When the workload is not deprecated, that workload has a firewall. Item D. When the workload is provisioned, that workload is containerized. Item E. When the workload is throttled, that workload is provisioned. Item F. When the workload is provisioned, that workload is not containerized. Item F is suspended when the workload is autoscaled. Item F is suspended when the workload is not stateless. Item D is suspended when the workload is stateless. Item B is suspended when the workload is throttled. Item F outranks Item D. Item A outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Juno is containerized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007848", "pair_id": "u007848-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u007848-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7ec9adb999f0e434", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007865-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is fragile. Mirela is not tracked. Mirela is not sealed. Mirela is fragile. Mirela is consolidated. Thilo is consolidated.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is sealed, then it is not refrigerated. (2) If a parcel has a barcode, then it is scanned. (3) If a parcel is consolidated, then it is delayed. (4) If a parcel is not sealed, then it is refrigerated. (5) If a parcel is sealed, then it is not scanned. (1) is void if the parcel has a barcode. (4) is void if the parcel is tracked. (1) is void if the parcel is fragile. When (5) and (2) clash, (5) prevails. When (1) and (4) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Mirela is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007865", "pair_id": "u007865-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007865-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2f8eaeb504141299", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u007865-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is fragile. Mirela is not tracked. Mirela is not sealed. Mirela is fragile. Mirela is consolidated. Thilo is consolidated.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is sealed, then it is not refrigerated. (2) If a parcel has a barcode, then it is scanned. (3) If a parcel is consolidated, then it is delayed. (4) If a parcel is sealed, then it is refrigerated. (5) If a parcel is sealed, then it is not scanned. (1) is void if the parcel has a barcode. (4) is void if the parcel is tracked. (1) is void if the parcel is fragile. When (5) and (2) clash, (5) prevails. When (1) and (4) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Mirela is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007865", "pair_id": "u007865-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007865-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "57feddf769ee2cca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u007874-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is tagged. Mica is not fuzzed. Quartz is not fuzzed. Mica has no security advisory. Quartz has no security advisory. Quartz has no changelog. Quartz is not versioned. Talc is tagged. Talc has a security advisory. Mica has a changelog.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is tagged, it also is tested. Clause 2: once any build is localized and also has a changelog, it also is backported. Clause 3: once any build is tested and also is fuzzed and also is versioned, it also is notarized. Clause 4: once any build is notarized, it also has a feature toggle. Clause 5: once any build is tested and also has no security advisory, it also is not notarized. Question: Does it follow that Quartz is notarized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u007874", "pair_id": "u007874-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007874-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "d9cbdaf1f17b6c4d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007874-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is tagged. Mica is not fuzzed. Quartz is not fuzzed. Mica has no security advisory. Quartz has no security advisory. Quartz has no changelog. Quartz is not versioned. Talc is tagged. Talc has a security advisory. Mica has a changelog.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is tagged, it also is tested. Clause 2: once any build is localized and also has a changelog, it also is backported. Clause 3: once any build is tested and also is fuzzed and also is versioned, it also is notarized. Clause 4: once any build is notarized, it also has a feature toggle. Clause 5: once any build is tested and also has a security advisory, it also is not notarized. Question: Does it follow that Quartz is notarized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007874", "pair_id": "u007874-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007874-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "aa11a60e50ad2f94", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007937-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar is not autoscaled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is autoscaled, it also is containerized. Clause 2: once any workload is autoscaled, it also is throttled. Question: Does it follow that Quasar has no dedicated host?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007937", "pair_id": "u007937-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007937-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "6195d46c1d076100", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007937-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar is not autoscaled. Quasar has no dedicated host.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is autoscaled, it also is containerized. Clause 2: once any workload is autoscaled, it also is throttled. Question: Does it follow that Quasar has no dedicated host?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007937", "pair_id": "u007937-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007937-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "8a7e4d0e580d1694", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007988-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel is not diabetic. Wendel is triaged.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is diabetic plus is triaged: then it is waitlisted. Question: Is it so that Wendel is hypertensive?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007988", "pair_id": "u007988-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007988-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "29d3431eb314c541", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007988-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel is hypertensive. Wendel is not diabetic. Wendel is triaged.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is diabetic plus is triaged: then it is waitlisted. Question: Is it so that Wendel is hypertensive?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007988", "pair_id": "u007988-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007988-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "08ec25c01be17d39", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007988-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel is not diabetic. Wendel is triaged.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is diabetic and additionally is triaged, it then is waitlisted. Question: Do the terms above show that Wendel is hypertensive?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u007988", "pair_id": "u007988-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007988-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "29d3431eb314c541", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u007988-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel is hypertensive. Wendel is not diabetic. Wendel is triaged.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is diabetic and additionally is triaged, it then is waitlisted. Question: Do the terms above show that Wendel is hypertensive?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u007988", "pair_id": "u007988-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u007988-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "08ec25c01be17d39", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008008-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sigrid is bilingual. Noor is not unionized. Jasna is not bilingual. Jasna has no mentor. Jasna is a veteran. Jasna is not bonded. Jasna is not relocating. Jasna is not probationary. Sigrid has a mentor. Jasna is not unionized. Sigrid is not bonded. Sigrid is not eligible. Noor is not bilingual. Noor is not bonded. Jasna is not eligible.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is a veteran, so it is onboarded. No. 2 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise has a mentor, so it has a signing bonus. No. 3 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise is certified, so it has a background screening. No. 4 While the given candidate is not eligible, so it has no background screening. No. 5 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise is not unionized, so it is interviewed. No. 6 While the given candidate is bonded, so it is not fingerprinted. No. 7 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise is bilingual, so it is freelance. No. 8 While the given candidate is not unionized, so it is not a graduate. No. 9 While the given candidate is relocating, so it is not freelance. No. 10 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise is not probationary and likewise has no mentor, so it is a graduate. No. 11 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise is relocating, so it is licensed. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is certified. No. 4 wins over No. 3. No. 8 wins over No. 10. No. 9 wins over No. 7. Question: Select what holds for Jasna: which option?", "options": ["is interviewed", "is licensed", "has a background screening", "has a signing bonus", "is freelance", "is a graduate"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is interviewed", "unit_id": "u008008", "pair_id": "u008008-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008008-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a18b2f9ce1a75a75", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a8", "a1", "a9", "a15", "a10", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008008-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sigrid is bilingual. Noor is not unionized. Jasna is not bilingual. Jasna has no mentor. Jasna is a veteran. Jasna is not bonded. Jasna is not relocating. Jasna is not probationary. Sigrid has a mentor. Jasna is unionized. Sigrid is not bonded. Sigrid is not eligible. Noor is not bilingual. Noor is not bonded. Jasna is not eligible.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is a veteran, so it is onboarded. No. 2 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise has a mentor, so it has a signing bonus. No. 3 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise is certified, so it has a background screening. No. 4 While the given candidate is not eligible, so it has no background screening. No. 5 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise is not unionized, so it is interviewed. No. 6 While the given candidate is bonded, so it is not fingerprinted. No. 7 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise is bilingual, so it is freelance. No. 8 While the given candidate is not unionized, so it is not a graduate. No. 9 While the given candidate is relocating, so it is not freelance. No. 10 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise is not probationary and likewise has no mentor, so it is a graduate. No. 11 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise is relocating, so it is licensed. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is certified. No. 4 wins over No. 3. No. 8 wins over No. 10. No. 9 wins over No. 7. Question: Select what holds for Jasna: which option?", "options": ["is interviewed", "is licensed", "has a background screening", "has a signing bonus", "is freelance", "is a graduate"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is a graduate", "unit_id": "u008008", "pair_id": "u008008-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008008-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a525c8b49ccc55bf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a8", "a1", "a9", "a15", "a10", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008034-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse has a milestone total of 29. Betelgeuse is budgeted. Deneb has industry backing. Betelgeuse is not shortlisted. Deneb has a milestone total of 3. Deneb is translational. Betelgeuse is collaborative. Deneb is not collaborative. Deneb has a postdoc. Deneb is not shortlisted. Deneb is not budgeted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is endorsed: then it has seed funding. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has seed funding plus has a milestone total smaller than 51: then it is peer reviewed. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has seed funding plus is collaborative: then it has a steering committee. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is longitudinal: then it has no field site. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is budgeted: then it is not renewed. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has seed funding plus has industry backing plus has a review mark higher than 62: then it is theoretical. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal has seed funding plus has a postdoc plus has a review mark no higher than 83: then it is exploratory. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal is translational: then it is endorsed. Policy IX. Suppose that proposal has seed funding plus is shortlisted: then it has a field site. Policy X. Suppose that proposal is longitudinal: then it has no steering committee. Policy II is waived if that proposal is collaborative. Policy VI is waived if that proposal is shortlisted. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy IV. Question: Which choice is right for Deneb?", "options": ["is exploratory", "has a field site", "has a steering committee", "is peer reviewed", "is theoretical"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is peer reviewed", "unit_id": "u008034", "pair_id": "u008034-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008034-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d5280c0da50671bd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a3", "a14", "a16", "a15"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008034-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse has a milestone total of 29. Betelgeuse is budgeted. Deneb has industry backing. Betelgeuse is not shortlisted. Deneb has a milestone total of 3. Deneb is translational. Betelgeuse is collaborative. Deneb is collaborative. Deneb has a postdoc. Deneb is not shortlisted. Deneb is not budgeted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is endorsed: then it has seed funding. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has seed funding plus has a milestone total smaller than 51: then it is peer reviewed. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has seed funding plus is collaborative: then it has a steering committee. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is longitudinal: then it has no field site. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is budgeted: then it is not renewed. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has seed funding plus has industry backing plus has a review mark higher than 62: then it is theoretical. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal has seed funding plus has a postdoc plus has a review mark no higher than 83: then it is exploratory. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal is translational: then it is endorsed. Policy IX. Suppose that proposal has seed funding plus is shortlisted: then it has a field site. Policy X. Suppose that proposal is longitudinal: then it has no steering committee. Policy II is waived if that proposal is collaborative. Policy VI is waived if that proposal is shortlisted. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy IV. Question: Which choice is right for Deneb?", "options": ["is exploratory", "has a field site", "has a steering committee", "is peer reviewed", "is theoretical"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a steering committee", "unit_id": "u008034", "pair_id": "u008034-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008034-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3f7ce1cad957e8b5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a3", "a14", "a16", "a15"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008035-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is notarized. Zircon is obsolete. Zircon is not reproducible. Zircon is experimental. Zircon is fuzzed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is compiled plus is obsolete: then it is not versioned. Policy II. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is compiled. Policy III. Suppose that build is compiled plus is reverted: then it is versioned. Policy IV. Suppose that build is not reproducible plus is experimental plus is notarized: then it has a feature toggle. Question: Is it so that Zircon is versioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008035", "pair_id": "u008035-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008035-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "2ee877f4fdef0277", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008035-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is notarized. Zircon is obsolete. Zircon is not reproducible. Zircon is experimental. Zircon is fuzzed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is compiled plus is obsolete: then it is not versioned. Policy II. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is compiled. Policy III. Suppose that build is compiled plus is reverted: then it is versioned. Policy IV. Suppose that build is reproducible plus is experimental plus is notarized: then it has a feature toggle. Question: Is it so that Zircon is versioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008035", "pair_id": "u008035-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008035-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "41eddf51f3e4183b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008050-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is reproducible. Shale is versioned. Shale is tested. Shale is notarized. Shale is minified. Shale is not experimental.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is signed, and is notarized, and is reproducible, that build is not tagged. Item B. When the build is tested, that build is not reverted. Item C. When the build is minified, and has a feature toggle, that build is merged. Item D. When the build is experimental, that build is not merged. Item E. When the build is notarized, and is tested, that build is signed. Item F. When the build is notarized, that build is not signed. Item G. When the build is localized, that build is reverted. Item H. When the build is signed, and is versioned, that build is tagged. Item A outranks Item H. Item E outranks Item F. Item D outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item G. Question: Can one infer that Shale is tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008050", "pair_id": "u008050-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008050-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "240a0bfeb873bb9b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008050-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is reproducible. Shale is versioned. Shale is tested. Shale is notarized. Shale is minified. Shale is not experimental.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is signed, and is notarized, and is reproducible, that build is not tagged. Item B. When the build is tested, that build is not reverted. Item C. When the build is minified, and has a feature toggle, that build is merged. Item D. When the build is experimental, that build is not merged. Item E. When the build is notarized, and is tested, that build is signed. Item F. When the build is notarized, that build is not signed. Item G. When the build is localized, that build is reverted. Item H. When the build is signed, and is versioned, that build is tagged. Item A outranks Item H. Item E outranks Item F. Item C outranks Item D. Item B outranks Item G. Question: Can one infer that Shale is tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008050", "pair_id": "u008050-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008050-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "40eedd7415bdeeb1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008074-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not obsolete. Galena is documented. Pumice has no migration script. Pumice is not documented. Galena has a migration script. Pumice is not obsolete. Pumice is merged. Galena is not merged. Galena is tested. Pumice is not tested.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is tagged provided that it is linted as well as has a migration script as well as is minified. Section 2: a build is minified provided that it has a migration script. Section 3: a build is not reverted provided that it is not merged. Section 4: a build is not tagged provided that it is linted as well as has no migration script as well as is flaky. Section 5: a build is flaky provided that it is obsolete as well as is documented. Section 6: a build is linted provided that it is tested. Question: Galena is tagged. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008074", "pair_id": "u008074-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008074-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "35ec8cf7e43192a7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008074-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not obsolete. Galena is documented. Pumice has no migration script. Pumice is not documented. Galena has a migration script. Pumice is not obsolete. Pumice is merged. Galena is not merged. Galena is tested. Pumice is not tested.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is tagged provided that it is linted as well as has a migration script as well as is minified. Section 2: a build is minified provided that it has a migration script. Section 3: a build is not reverted provided that it is not merged. Section 4: a build is not tagged provided that it is linted as well as has no migration script as well as is flaky. Section 5: a build is flaky provided that it is obsolete as well as is documented. Section 6: a build is linted provided that it is not tested. Question: Galena is tagged. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008074", "pair_id": "u008074-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008074-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "960263e9d8982633", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008074-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not obsolete. Galena is documented. Pumice has no migration script. Pumice is not documented. Galena has a migration script. Pumice is not obsolete. Pumice is merged. Galena is not merged. Galena is tested. Pumice is not tested.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is linted plus has a migration script plus is minified: then it is tagged. Policy II. Suppose that build has a migration script: then it is minified. Policy III. Suppose that build is not merged: then it is not reverted. Policy IV. Suppose that build is linted plus has no migration script plus is flaky: then it is not tagged. Policy V. Suppose that build is obsolete plus is documented: then it is flaky. Policy VI. Suppose that build is tested: then it is linted. Question: Is it so that Galena is tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008074", "pair_id": "u008074-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008074-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "35ec8cf7e43192a7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008074-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not obsolete. Galena is documented. Pumice has no migration script. Pumice is not documented. Galena has a migration script. Pumice is not obsolete. Pumice is merged. Galena is not merged. Galena is tested. Pumice is not tested.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is linted plus has a migration script plus is minified: then it is tagged. Policy II. Suppose that build has a migration script: then it is minified. Policy III. Suppose that build is not merged: then it is not reverted. Policy IV. Suppose that build is linted plus has no migration script plus is flaky: then it is not tagged. Policy V. Suppose that build is obsolete plus is documented: then it is flaky. Policy VI. Suppose that build is not tested: then it is linted. Question: Is it so that Galena is tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008074", "pair_id": "u008074-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008074-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "960263e9d8982633", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008074-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not obsolete. Galena is documented. Pumice has no migration script. Pumice is not documented. Galena has a migration script. Pumice is not obsolete. Pumice is merged. Galena is not merged. Galena is tested. Pumice is not tested.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is linted and additionally has a migration script and additionally is minified, it then is tagged. #2 Each time a build has a migration script, it then is minified. #3 Each time a build is not merged, it then is not reverted. #4 Each time a build is linted and additionally has no migration script and additionally is flaky, it then is not tagged. #5 Each time a build is obsolete and additionally is documented, it then is flaky. #6 Each time a build is tested, it then is linted. Question: Do the terms above show that Galena is tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008074", "pair_id": "u008074-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008074-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "35ec8cf7e43192a7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008074-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not obsolete. Galena is documented. Pumice has no migration script. Pumice is not documented. Galena has a migration script. Pumice is not obsolete. Pumice is merged. Galena is not merged. Galena is tested. Pumice is not tested.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is linted and additionally has a migration script and additionally is minified, it then is tagged. #2 Each time a build has a migration script, it then is minified. #3 Each time a build is not merged, it then is not reverted. #4 Each time a build is linted and additionally has no migration script and additionally is flaky, it then is not tagged. #5 Each time a build is obsolete and additionally is documented, it then is flaky. #6 Each time a build is not tested, it then is linted. Question: Do the terms above show that Galena is tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008074", "pair_id": "u008074-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008074-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "960263e9d8982633", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008078-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Folke is not amortized. Evren has a lien. Folke has an escrow account. Folke is pensioned. Evren is not amortized. Folke has a mortgage. Evren has a mortgage. Evren has no escrow account. Evren is indebted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has an escrow account while is indebted while is refinanced, thus it is not vetted. Provision 2: when the borrower here is amortized while has a lien, thus it is overdrawn. Provision 3: when the borrower here is pensioned while has a mortgage, thus it is vetted. Provision 4: when the borrower here is pensioned while is underwritten, thus it is delinquent. Provision 5: when the borrower here is pensioned while is indebted, thus it is solvent. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here is indebted. Provision 2 has no effect when the borrower here is pensioned. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Which one describes Folke?", "options": ["is solvent", "is delinquent", "is vetted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is vetted", "unit_id": "u008078", "pair_id": "u008078-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008078-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e560c378db71cfd7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a1", "a2"]}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u008078-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Folke is not amortized. Evren has a lien. Folke has an escrow account. Folke is pensioned. Evren is not amortized. Folke has a mortgage. Evren has a mortgage. Evren has no escrow account. Evren is indebted. Folke is indebted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has an escrow account while is indebted while is refinanced, thus it is not vetted. Provision 2: when the borrower here is amortized while has a lien, thus it is overdrawn. Provision 3: when the borrower here is pensioned while has a mortgage, thus it is vetted. Provision 4: when the borrower here is pensioned while is underwritten, thus it is delinquent. Provision 5: when the borrower here is pensioned while is indebted, thus it is solvent. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here is indebted. Provision 2 has no effect when the borrower here is pensioned. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Which one describes Folke?", "options": ["is solvent", "is delinquent", "is vetted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is solvent", "unit_id": "u008078", "pair_id": "u008078-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008078-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "14ab7f1e9ee1d23e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a1", "a2"]}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u008078-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Folke is not amortized. Evren has a lien. Folke has an escrow account. Folke is pensioned. Evren is not amortized. Folke has a mortgage. Evren has a mortgage. Evren has no escrow account. Evren is indebted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has an escrow account and further is indebted and further is refinanced, it thereby is not vetted. Point B. If said borrower is amortized and further has a lien, it thereby is overdrawn. Point C. If said borrower is pensioned and further has a mortgage, it thereby is vetted. Point D. If said borrower is pensioned and further is underwritten, it thereby is delinquent. Point E. If said borrower is pensioned and further is indebted, it thereby is solvent. Point C is cancelled if said borrower is indebted. Point B is cancelled if said borrower is pensioned. Point A supersedes Point C. Question: Which choice is true for Folke?", "options": ["is solvent", "is delinquent", "is vetted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is vetted", "unit_id": "u008078", "pair_id": "u008078-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008078-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e560c378db71cfd7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a1", "a2"]}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u008078-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Folke is not amortized. Evren has a lien. Folke has an escrow account. Folke is pensioned. Evren is not amortized. Folke has a mortgage. Evren has a mortgage. Evren has no escrow account. Evren is indebted. Folke is indebted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has an escrow account and further is indebted and further is refinanced, it thereby is not vetted. Point B. If said borrower is amortized and further has a lien, it thereby is overdrawn. Point C. If said borrower is pensioned and further has a mortgage, it thereby is vetted. Point D. If said borrower is pensioned and further is underwritten, it thereby is delinquent. Point E. If said borrower is pensioned and further is indebted, it thereby is solvent. Point C is cancelled if said borrower is indebted. Point B is cancelled if said borrower is pensioned. Point A supersedes Point C. Question: Which choice is true for Folke?", "options": ["is solvent", "is delinquent", "is vetted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is solvent", "unit_id": "u008078", "pair_id": "u008078-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008078-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "14ab7f1e9ee1d23e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a1", "a2"]}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u008078-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Folke is not amortized. Evren has a lien. Folke has an escrow account. Folke is pensioned. Evren is not amortized. Folke has a mortgage. Evren has a mortgage. Evren has no escrow account. Evren is indebted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has an escrow account and likewise is indebted and likewise is refinanced, so it is not vetted. No. 2 While the given borrower is amortized and likewise has a lien, so it is overdrawn. No. 3 While the given borrower is pensioned and likewise has a mortgage, so it is vetted. No. 4 While the given borrower is pensioned and likewise is underwritten, so it is delinquent. No. 5 While the given borrower is pensioned and likewise is indebted, so it is solvent. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given borrower is indebted. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given borrower is pensioned. No. 1 wins over No. 3. Question: Select what holds for Folke: which option?", "options": ["is solvent", "is delinquent", "is vetted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is vetted", "unit_id": "u008078", "pair_id": "u008078-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008078-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e560c378db71cfd7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a1", "a2"]}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u008078-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Folke is not amortized. Evren has a lien. Folke has an escrow account. Folke is pensioned. Evren is not amortized. Folke has a mortgage. Evren has a mortgage. Evren has no escrow account. Evren is indebted. Folke is indebted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has an escrow account and likewise is indebted and likewise is refinanced, so it is not vetted. No. 2 While the given borrower is amortized and likewise has a lien, so it is overdrawn. No. 3 While the given borrower is pensioned and likewise has a mortgage, so it is vetted. No. 4 While the given borrower is pensioned and likewise is underwritten, so it is delinquent. No. 5 While the given borrower is pensioned and likewise is indebted, so it is solvent. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given borrower is indebted. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given borrower is pensioned. No. 1 wins over No. 3. Question: Select what holds for Folke: which option?", "options": ["is solvent", "is delinquent", "is vetted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is solvent", "unit_id": "u008078", "pair_id": "u008078-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008078-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "14ab7f1e9ee1d23e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a1", "a2"]}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u008100-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wiebke is not creditworthy. Greta is refinanced. Wiebke is not audited. Greta has a risk tier of 59. Wiebke has a credit rating of 25. Evren has a repayment grade of 99. Wiebke is prequalified. Wiebke has a repayment grade of 7. Greta is not prequalified. Wiebke is refinanced. Evren has a mortgage. Wiebke has a mortgage. Greta is audited. Greta has a mortgage.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has a risk tier smaller than 57: then it has no escrow account. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has a repayment grade smaller than 18 plus has a credit rating no lower than 24: then it is overdrawn. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is overdrawn plus is creditworthy plus has a mortgage: then it is solvent. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is audited plus is refinanced plus has a debt ratio smaller than 82: then it has collateral. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is overdrawn plus is refinanced plus has a risk tier no lower than 15: then it has a cosigner. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is overdrawn plus is not creditworthy plus is not underwritten: then it is indebted. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has a credit rating higher than 13 plus has a repayment grade smaller than 76 plus is prequalified: then it is not underwritten. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower is overdrawn plus is not refinanced: then it has a guarantor. Policy IV is waived if that borrower has a repayment grade no higher than 29. Question: Which choice is right for Wiebke?", "options": ["has a guarantor", "is indebted", "has a cosigner", "is solvent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is indebted", "unit_id": "u008100", "pair_id": "u008100-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008100-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0abf449cfbc0393c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a3", "a9", "a16", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008100-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wiebke is creditworthy. Greta is refinanced. Wiebke is not audited. Greta has a risk tier of 59. Wiebke has a credit rating of 25. Evren has a repayment grade of 99. Wiebke is prequalified. Wiebke has a repayment grade of 7. Greta is not prequalified. Wiebke is refinanced. Evren has a mortgage. Wiebke has a mortgage. Greta is audited. Greta has a mortgage.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has a risk tier smaller than 57: then it has no escrow account. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has a repayment grade smaller than 18 plus has a credit rating no lower than 24: then it is overdrawn. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is overdrawn plus is creditworthy plus has a mortgage: then it is solvent. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is audited plus is refinanced plus has a debt ratio smaller than 82: then it has collateral. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is overdrawn plus is refinanced plus has a risk tier no lower than 15: then it has a cosigner. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is overdrawn plus is not creditworthy plus is not underwritten: then it is indebted. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has a credit rating higher than 13 plus has a repayment grade smaller than 76 plus is prequalified: then it is not underwritten. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower is overdrawn plus is not refinanced: then it has a guarantor. Policy IV is waived if that borrower has a repayment grade no higher than 29. Question: Which choice is right for Wiebke?", "options": ["has a guarantor", "is indebted", "has a cosigner", "is solvent"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is solvent", "unit_id": "u008100", "pair_id": "u008100-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008100-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "558dc545bd376a21", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a3", "a9", "a16", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008107-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has roadside assistance. Celeste has no adjuster.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is not disputed provided that it has a premium discount. Section 2: a policyholder is a claimant provided that it has no premium discount. Section 3: a policyholder is reinstated provided that it is a smoker. Section 4: a policyholder has no rider provided that it has no roadside assistance. Section 5: a policyholder is a smoker provided that it has roadside assistance. Section 6: a policyholder is indemnified provided that it is a claimant. Section 7: a policyholder is uninsurable provided that it has no rider. Section 8: a policyholder is not retired provided that it is a smoker. Section 9: a policyholder is not lapsed provided that it has an adjuster. Section 10: a policyholder is covered provided that it has no adjuster. Section 11: a policyholder has a dashcam provided that it is not disputed. Question: Which statement fits Celeste?", "options": ["is uninsurable", "has a dashcam", "is reinstated", "is indemnified"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is reinstated", "unit_id": "u008107", "pair_id": "u008107-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008107-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "238eb99d7c322211", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a9", "a0", "a6"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008107-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has no roadside assistance. Celeste has no adjuster.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is not disputed provided that it has a premium discount. Section 2: a policyholder is a claimant provided that it has no premium discount. Section 3: a policyholder is reinstated provided that it is a smoker. Section 4: a policyholder has no rider provided that it has no roadside assistance. Section 5: a policyholder is a smoker provided that it has roadside assistance. Section 6: a policyholder is indemnified provided that it is a claimant. Section 7: a policyholder is uninsurable provided that it has no rider. Section 8: a policyholder is not retired provided that it is a smoker. Section 9: a policyholder is not lapsed provided that it has an adjuster. Section 10: a policyholder is covered provided that it has no adjuster. Section 11: a policyholder has a dashcam provided that it is not disputed. Question: Which statement fits Celeste?", "options": ["is uninsurable", "has a dashcam", "is reinstated", "is indemnified"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is uninsurable", "unit_id": "u008107", "pair_id": "u008107-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008107-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "94b5d5a94dd4a8e2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a9", "a0", "a6"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008108-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not fragile. Quentin has a waybill. Saskia has a delivery window of 58. Nandor is hazardous. Nandor is scanned. Quentin is not scanned. Saskia has a weight class of 9. Nandor has a postal zone of 51. Priya is fragile. Nandor has a parcel volume of 4. Nandor has a delivery window of 83. Quentin is not fragile. Quentin has a delivery window of 30. Priya is not hazardous. Saskia has a waybill. Priya has a parcel volume of 58. Nandor has a waybill. Nandor is fragile. Saskia has a parcel volume of 52. Priya has a weight class of 17. Nandor has a weight class of 87. Saskia is not stamped.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is misrouted and further has a weight class in excess of 55, it thereby is consolidated. Point B. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby is misrouted. Point C. If said parcel is misrouted and further has a weight class of maximum 55 and further has a postal zone of maximum 18, it thereby is not consolidated. Point D. If said parcel has a waybill and further is scanned, it thereby is sealed. Point E. If said parcel is fragile and further is hazardous and further has a delivery window of minimum 74, it thereby is delayed. Point F. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby is damaged. Point B is cancelled if said parcel is stamped. Point A is cancelled if said parcel has a postal zone of minimum 79 and further has a parcel volume short of 29. Point D is cancelled if said parcel has a postal zone of maximum 71. Question: Statement: Nandor is consolidated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008108", "pair_id": "u008108-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008108-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b736eced69a8d754", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u008108-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not fragile. Quentin has a waybill. Saskia has a delivery window of 58. Nandor is hazardous. Nandor is scanned. Quentin is not scanned. Saskia has a weight class of 9. Nandor has a postal zone of 51. Priya is fragile. Nandor has a parcel volume of 4. Nandor has a delivery window of 83. Quentin is not fragile. Quentin has a delivery window of 30. Priya is not hazardous. Saskia has a waybill. Priya has a parcel volume of 58. Nandor has a waybill. Nandor is fragile. Saskia has a parcel volume of 52. Priya has a weight class of 17. Nandor has a weight class of 87. Saskia is not stamped.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is misrouted and further has a weight class in excess of 55, it thereby is consolidated. Point B. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby is misrouted. Point C. If said parcel is misrouted and further has a weight class of maximum 55 and further has a postal zone of maximum 18, it thereby is not consolidated. Point D. If said parcel has a waybill and further is scanned, it thereby is sealed. Point E. If said parcel is fragile and further is hazardous and further has a delivery window of minimum 74, it thereby is delayed. Point F. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby is damaged. Point B is cancelled if said parcel is stamped. Point A is cancelled if said parcel has a postal zone of minimum 39 and further has a parcel volume short of 29. Point D is cancelled if said parcel has a postal zone of maximum 71. Question: Statement: Nandor is consolidated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008108", "pair_id": "u008108-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008108-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "213529522c42787d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u008155-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh is not refrigerated. Kaveh is not misrouted. Kaveh is registered. Kaveh has a courier. Kaveh is not scanned. Kaveh is fragile. Kaveh is not weighed. Kaveh is palletized. Kaveh is tracked. Kaveh is not perishable. Kaveh is undeliverable. Kaveh has a locker slot.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is fragile while is palletized while is weighed, thus it is not prepaid. Provision 2: when the parcel here is registered while has a locker slot while has a courier, thus it has a barcode. Provision 3: when the parcel here is registered while is weighed while is scanned, thus it is damaged. Provision 4: when the parcel here is registered while is fragile while is tracked, thus it is consolidated. Provision 5: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it is not damaged. Provision 6: when the parcel here is damaged, thus it is not sealed. Provision 7: when the parcel here is perishable while is oversized while is refrigerated, thus it is not labeled. Provision 8: when the parcel here has a locker slot, thus it is not consolidated. Provision 9: when the parcel here is registered while is misrouted, thus it is hazardous. Provision 7 has no effect when the parcel here is registered. Provision 6 has no effect when the parcel here is undeliverable. Provision 9 has no effect when the parcel here is weighed. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Kaveh?", "options": ["has a barcode", "is damaged", "is consolidated", "is hazardous"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a barcode", "unit_id": "u008155", "pair_id": "u008155-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008155-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "dc12b8916293f169", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a17", "a7", "a3"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008155-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh is not refrigerated. Kaveh is not misrouted. Kaveh is registered. Kaveh has a courier. Kaveh is not scanned. Kaveh is fragile. Kaveh is not weighed. Kaveh is palletized. Kaveh is tracked. Kaveh is not perishable. Kaveh is undeliverable. Kaveh has no locker slot.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is fragile while is palletized while is weighed, thus it is not prepaid. Provision 2: when the parcel here is registered while has a locker slot while has a courier, thus it has a barcode. Provision 3: when the parcel here is registered while is weighed while is scanned, thus it is damaged. Provision 4: when the parcel here is registered while is fragile while is tracked, thus it is consolidated. Provision 5: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it is not damaged. Provision 6: when the parcel here is damaged, thus it is not sealed. Provision 7: when the parcel here is perishable while is oversized while is refrigerated, thus it is not labeled. Provision 8: when the parcel here has a locker slot, thus it is not consolidated. Provision 9: when the parcel here is registered while is misrouted, thus it is hazardous. Provision 7 has no effect when the parcel here is registered. Provision 6 has no effect when the parcel here is undeliverable. Provision 9 has no effect when the parcel here is weighed. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Kaveh?", "options": ["has a barcode", "is damaged", "is consolidated", "is hazardous"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is consolidated", "unit_id": "u008155", "pair_id": "u008155-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008155-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "eb2fd28b62e5dd22", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a17", "a7", "a3"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008172-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jory is not oversized. Thilo is not misrouted. Thilo has a courier. Thilo is tracked. Quentin is not undeliverable. Odile is not misrouted. Odile is not refrigerated. Jory is refrigerated. Quentin is misrouted. Jory is misrouted. Quentin is not tracked. Thilo is undeliverable. Thilo is oversized. Jory is tracked.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is stamped provided that it has a courier. Section 2: a parcel is not labeled provided that it is rerouted as well as is not misrouted. Section 3: a parcel is rerouted provided that it has a locker slot as well as is undeliverable as well as is oversized. Section 4: a parcel is not perishable provided that it has a locker slot as well as is misrouted. Section 5: a parcel is perishable provided that it is oversized. Section 6: a parcel has a locker slot provided that it is oversized as well as is undeliverable. Section 7: a parcel is sealed provided that it is refrigerated as well as is undeliverable. Section 8: a parcel is labeled provided that it is rerouted as well as is tracked as well as is stamped. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Thilo is labeled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008172", "pair_id": "u008172-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008172-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bed5704ebe28cb1f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008172-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jory is not oversized. Thilo is not misrouted. Thilo has a courier. Thilo is tracked. Quentin is not undeliverable. Odile is not misrouted. Odile is not refrigerated. Jory is refrigerated. Quentin is misrouted. Jory is misrouted. Quentin is not tracked. Thilo is undeliverable. Thilo is oversized. Jory is tracked.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is stamped provided that it has a courier. Section 2: a parcel is not labeled provided that it is rerouted as well as is misrouted. Section 3: a parcel is rerouted provided that it has a locker slot as well as is undeliverable as well as is oversized. Section 4: a parcel is not perishable provided that it has a locker slot as well as is misrouted. Section 5: a parcel is perishable provided that it is oversized. Section 6: a parcel has a locker slot provided that it is oversized as well as is undeliverable. Section 7: a parcel is sealed provided that it is refrigerated as well as is undeliverable. Section 8: a parcel is labeled provided that it is rerouted as well as is tracked as well as is stamped. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Thilo is labeled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008172", "pair_id": "u008172-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008172-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f4ce6d0e14a96bdd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008236-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor has an aptitude quotient of 27. Petra has a commute radius of 30. Petra has a seniority step of 33. Noor is onboarded. Noor is unionized. Noor has a notice period of 8. Noor has a commute radius of 60.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is recommended provided that it has a notice period lower than 12 as well as has an aptitude quotient of 69 or higher. Section 2: a candidate has a signing bonus provided that it is unionized as well as has a commute radius of 61 or higher as well as has a seniority step of 56 or lower. Section 3: a candidate has no signing bonus provided that it has an aptitude quotient of 63 or higher. Section 4: a candidate is a graduate provided that it has a notice period lower than 12 as well as has a commute radius of 67 or higher as well as is onboarded. Section 5: a candidate is freelance provided that it has a notice period lower than 12 as well as has a commute radius lower than 67 as well as has an aptitude quotient lower than 35. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Which statement fits Noor?", "options": ["is recommended", "is freelance", "is a graduate"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is freelance", "unit_id": "u008236", "pair_id": "u008236-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008236-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e901eb35f1fce5fc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a0", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008236-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor has an aptitude quotient of 27. Petra has a commute radius of 30. Petra has a seniority step of 33. Noor is onboarded. Noor is unionized. Noor has a notice period of 8. Noor has a commute radius of 98.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is recommended provided that it has a notice period lower than 12 as well as has an aptitude quotient of 69 or higher. Section 2: a candidate has a signing bonus provided that it is unionized as well as has a commute radius of 61 or higher as well as has a seniority step of 56 or lower. Section 3: a candidate has no signing bonus provided that it has an aptitude quotient of 63 or higher. Section 4: a candidate is a graduate provided that it has a notice period lower than 12 as well as has a commute radius of 67 or higher as well as is onboarded. Section 5: a candidate is freelance provided that it has a notice period lower than 12 as well as has a commute radius lower than 67 as well as has an aptitude quotient lower than 35. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Which statement fits Noor?", "options": ["is recommended", "is freelance", "is a graduate"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a graduate", "unit_id": "u008236", "pair_id": "u008236-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008236-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6662847bf53e01da", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a0", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008240-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma is not collaborative. Hadar is peer reviewed. Betelgeuse is embargoed. Gemma is not longitudinal. Izar is not endorsed. Izar is shortlisted. Betelgeuse has seed funding. Betelgeuse is not endorsed. Hadar is collaborative. Hadar is not endorsed. Izar is collaborative. Betelgeuse is budgeted. Betelgeuse is not collaborative. Betelgeuse is not theoretical. Izar is peer reviewed. Gemma is not budgeted. Gemma is theoretical. Hadar is longitudinal. Betelgeuse is shortlisted. Gemma is not shortlisted. Betelgeuse is not peer reviewed. Izar is not embargoed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study plus is endorsed: then it is not exploratory. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed plus is theoretical plus is embargoed: then it is preregistered. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has seed funding plus is embargoed: then it is a pilot study. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study plus is budgeted plus is not shortlisted: then it is exploratory. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is embargoed plus is peer reviewed plus is longitudinal: then it is resubmitted. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study plus has seed funding plus is budgeted: then it has ethics clearance. Policy III is waived if that proposal is embargoed plus is collaborative. Policy VI is waived if that proposal is peer reviewed. Question: Is it so that Betelgeuse is exploratory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008240", "pair_id": "u008240-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008240-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3049960e801e5483", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a13", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008240-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma is not collaborative. Hadar is peer reviewed. Betelgeuse is embargoed. Gemma is not longitudinal. Izar is not endorsed. Izar is shortlisted. Betelgeuse has seed funding. Betelgeuse is not endorsed. Hadar is collaborative. Hadar is not endorsed. Izar is collaborative. Betelgeuse is budgeted. Betelgeuse is not collaborative. Betelgeuse is not theoretical. Izar is peer reviewed. Gemma is not budgeted. Gemma is theoretical. Hadar is longitudinal. Betelgeuse is shortlisted. Gemma is not shortlisted. Betelgeuse is not peer reviewed. Izar is not embargoed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study plus is endorsed: then it is not exploratory. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed plus is theoretical plus is embargoed: then it is preregistered. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has seed funding plus is embargoed: then it is a pilot study. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study plus is budgeted plus is shortlisted: then it is exploratory. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is embargoed plus is peer reviewed plus is longitudinal: then it is resubmitted. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study plus has seed funding plus is budgeted: then it has ethics clearance. Policy III is waived if that proposal is embargoed plus is collaborative. Policy VI is waived if that proposal is peer reviewed. Question: Is it so that Betelgeuse is exploratory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008240", "pair_id": "u008240-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008240-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b665713d229a777c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a13", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008248-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke is bankrupt. Wiebke is pensioned. Greta is not pensioned. Wiebke has no escrow account.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no guarantor provided that it has an escrow account as well as is pensioned. Section 1 lapses for a borrower if it is pensioned. Question: Greta is bankrupt. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008248", "pair_id": "u008248-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008248-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "78e1272247a67d41", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008248-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke is bankrupt. Wiebke is pensioned. Greta is not pensioned. Greta is bankrupt. Wiebke has no escrow account.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no guarantor provided that it has an escrow account as well as is pensioned. Section 1 lapses for a borrower if it is pensioned. Question: Greta is bankrupt. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008248", "pair_id": "u008248-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008248-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "02d271b9692a0ae4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008328-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny has a lien. Dagny has no mortgage. Evren is prequalified. Dagny is not overdrawn.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is prequalified and is not overdrawn, then it has no escrow account. (2) If a borrower has a cosigner and is overdrawn, then it has a guarantor. (3) If a borrower is prequalified and has no mortgage and has no lien, then it has an escrow account. When (1) and (3) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Dagny has an escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008328", "pair_id": "u008328-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008328-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "08f0f496894feb42", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008328-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny has a lien. Dagny has no mortgage. Evren is prequalified. Dagny is prequalified. Dagny is not overdrawn.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is prequalified and is not overdrawn, then it has no escrow account. (2) If a borrower has a cosigner and is overdrawn, then it has a guarantor. (3) If a borrower is prequalified and has no mortgage and has no lien, then it has an escrow account. When (1) and (3) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Dagny has an escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008328", "pair_id": "u008328-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008328-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2de0aeae925d523f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008411-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not eligible. Ivo is not unionized. Petra is not unionized. Mads is unionized. Ivo is bilingual. Teodor is unionized. Mads is a veteran. Teodor is eligible. Petra is probationary. Teodor is not probationary. Teodor is not fingerprinted. Petra is bilingual. Petra is a veteran. Petra is eligible. Ivo is not a graduate. Ivo is not a veteran. Ivo is not probationary. Petra is fingerprinted. Petra is not a graduate. Teodor is recommended. Mads is not bilingual.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is bilingual, so it is interviewed. No. 2 While the given candidate is eligible and likewise is not a veteran and likewise is bilingual, so it is licensed. No. 3 While the given candidate is a graduate, so it is seasoned. No. 4 While the given candidate is licensed and likewise is bilingual and likewise is unionized, so it is freelance. No. 5 While the given candidate is probationary and likewise is fingerprinted, so it is not bonded. No. 6 While the given candidate is licensed and likewise is recommended, so it is not freelance. Question: Is the claim \"Petra is not freelance\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008411", "pair_id": "u008411-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008411-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "4eaeff0d5b4ccdf4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008411-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not eligible. Ivo is not unionized. Petra is not unionized. Mads is unionized. Ivo is bilingual. Teodor is unionized. Mads is a veteran. Teodor is eligible. Petra is probationary. Teodor is not probationary. Teodor is not fingerprinted. Petra is bilingual. Petra is a veteran. Petra is eligible. Ivo is not a graduate. Ivo is not a veteran. Ivo is not probationary. Petra is fingerprinted. Petra is not a graduate. Teodor is recommended. Mads is not bilingual.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is bilingual, so it is interviewed. No. 2 While the given candidate is eligible and likewise is a veteran and likewise is bilingual, so it is licensed. No. 3 While the given candidate is a graduate, so it is seasoned. No. 4 While the given candidate is licensed and likewise is bilingual and likewise is unionized, so it is freelance. No. 5 While the given candidate is probationary and likewise is fingerprinted, so it is not bonded. No. 6 While the given candidate is licensed and likewise is recommended, so it is not freelance. Question: Is the claim \"Petra is not freelance\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008411", "pair_id": "u008411-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008411-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "ab0b9a5735c110d9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008450-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has a notice period of 71. Jasna is probationary. Jasna has a commute radius of 11. Rune has a commute radius of 82. Rune is probationary.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate has a visa, and has a commute radius of more than 64, and has a notice period of more than 42, that candidate is a veteran. Item B. When the candidate is freelance, that candidate is not licensed. Item C. When the candidate is probationary, that candidate is licensed. Item D. When the candidate has a notice period of no less than 66, and is probationary, that candidate has a visa. Item E. When the candidate has a visa, and has a commute radius of more than 64, and is probationary, that candidate is not a veteran. Item E outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Rune is a veteran?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008450", "pair_id": "u008450-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008450-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2ee2fb24b1c8ddfd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u008450-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has a notice period of 71. Jasna is probationary. Jasna has a commute radius of 11. Rune has a commute radius of 82. Rune is probationary.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate has a visa, and has a commute radius of more than 64, and has a notice period of more than 42, that candidate is a veteran. Item B. When the candidate is freelance, that candidate is not licensed. Item C. When the candidate is probationary, that candidate is licensed. Item D. When the candidate has a notice period of no less than 66, and is probationary, that candidate has a visa. Item E. When the candidate has a visa, and has a commute radius of no more than 64, and is probationary, that candidate is not a veteran. Item E outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Rune is a veteran?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008450", "pair_id": "u008450-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008450-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5fe6c8b8277c2377", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u008473-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena is profiled. Galena is reproducible. Galena is linted. Galena is compiled. Galena is not signed. Galena is fuzzed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is merged: then it has a migration script. Policy II. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is benchmarked. Policy III. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is obsolete. Policy IV. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it has a changelog. Policy V. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is minified. Policy VI. Suppose that build is linted: then it is flaky. Policy VII. Suppose that build is signed: then it is experimental. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it is not merged. Policy IX. Suppose that build is not linted: then it is reverted. Policy X. Suppose that build is experimental: then it has a security advisory. Policy XI. Suppose that build is not profiled: then it is merged. Policy XII. Suppose that build is compiled: then it is versioned. Policy XII is waived if that build is not reproducible. Policy V is waived if that build is signed. Policy III is waived if that build is not compiled. Policy II is waived if that build is not profiled. Policy VI is waived if that build is not profiled. In a clash, Policy XI beats Policy VIII. Question: Which choice is right for Galena?", "options": ["has a security advisory", "has a migration script", "is minified", "is benchmarked"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is benchmarked", "unit_id": "u008473", "pair_id": "u008473-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008473-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "02c4020b14a3c7e8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a1", "a8", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008473-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena is profiled. Galena is reproducible. Galena is linted. Galena is not compiled. Galena is not signed. Galena is fuzzed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is merged: then it has a migration script. Policy II. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is benchmarked. Policy III. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is obsolete. Policy IV. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it has a changelog. Policy V. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is minified. Policy VI. Suppose that build is linted: then it is flaky. Policy VII. Suppose that build is signed: then it is experimental. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it is not merged. Policy IX. Suppose that build is not linted: then it is reverted. Policy X. Suppose that build is experimental: then it has a security advisory. Policy XI. Suppose that build is not profiled: then it is merged. Policy XII. Suppose that build is compiled: then it is versioned. Policy XII is waived if that build is not reproducible. Policy V is waived if that build is signed. Policy III is waived if that build is not compiled. Policy II is waived if that build is not profiled. Policy VI is waived if that build is not profiled. In a clash, Policy XI beats Policy VIII. Question: Which choice is right for Galena?", "options": ["has a security advisory", "has a migration script", "is minified", "is benchmarked"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is benchmarked", "unit_id": "u008473", "pair_id": "u008473-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008473-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1267010161b13712", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a1", "a8", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008477-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Folke is employed. Folke is not indebted. Folke has a cosigner. Folke has a guarantor. Dagny has a repayment grade of 75. Folke is not overdrawn. Folke is not creditworthy. Bastien has a repayment grade of 35. Dagny is not underwritten. Bastien is not underwritten. Bastien is not employed. Dagny is indebted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is solvent while is overdrawn, thus it is bankrupt. Provision 2: when the borrower here is employed while has a guarantor, thus it is a depositor. Provision 3: when the borrower here is employed while is audited while is underwritten, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 4: when the borrower here is employed while has a repayment grade at or below 14 while is overdrawn, thus it is garnished. Provision 5: when the borrower here is audited, thus it is not garnished. Provision 6: when the borrower here is employed while is indebted, thus it is solvent. Provision 7: when the borrower here is indebted, thus it is not a depositor. Provision 8: when the borrower here is creditworthy, thus it is amortized. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Which one describes Folke?", "options": ["is solvent", "is foreclosed", "is garnished", "is a depositor"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a depositor", "unit_id": "u008477", "pair_id": "u008477-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008477-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5fb2a8659db3867f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a11", "a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u008477-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Folke is employed. Folke is not indebted. Folke has a cosigner. Folke has a guarantor. Dagny has a repayment grade of 75. Folke is not overdrawn. Folke is creditworthy. Bastien has a repayment grade of 35. Dagny is not underwritten. Bastien is not underwritten. Bastien is not employed. Dagny is indebted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is solvent while is overdrawn, thus it is bankrupt. Provision 2: when the borrower here is employed while has a guarantor, thus it is a depositor. Provision 3: when the borrower here is employed while is audited while is underwritten, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 4: when the borrower here is employed while has a repayment grade at or below 14 while is overdrawn, thus it is garnished. Provision 5: when the borrower here is audited, thus it is not garnished. Provision 6: when the borrower here is employed while is indebted, thus it is solvent. Provision 7: when the borrower here is indebted, thus it is not a depositor. Provision 8: when the borrower here is creditworthy, thus it is amortized. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Which one describes Folke?", "options": ["is solvent", "is foreclosed", "is garnished", "is a depositor"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a depositor", "unit_id": "u008477", "pair_id": "u008477-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008477-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "387d282941d1f9cf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a11", "a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u008477-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Folke is employed. Folke is not indebted. Folke has a cosigner. Folke has a guarantor. Dagny has a repayment grade of 75. Folke is not overdrawn. Folke is not creditworthy. Bastien has a repayment grade of 35. Dagny is not underwritten. Bastien is not underwritten. Bastien is not employed. Dagny is indebted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is solvent and likewise is overdrawn, so it is bankrupt. No. 2 While the given borrower is employed and likewise has a guarantor, so it is a depositor. No. 3 While the given borrower is employed and likewise is audited and likewise is underwritten, so it is foreclosed. No. 4 While the given borrower is employed and likewise has a repayment grade not above 14 and likewise is overdrawn, so it is garnished. No. 5 While the given borrower is audited, so it is not garnished. No. 6 While the given borrower is employed and likewise is indebted, so it is solvent. No. 7 While the given borrower is indebted, so it is not a depositor. No. 8 While the given borrower is creditworthy, so it is amortized. No. 5 wins over No. 4. No. 7 wins over No. 2. Question: Select what holds for Folke: which option?", "options": ["is solvent", "is foreclosed", "is garnished", "is a depositor"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a depositor", "unit_id": "u008477", "pair_id": "u008477-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008477-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5fb2a8659db3867f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a11", "a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u008477-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Folke is employed. Folke is not indebted. Folke has a cosigner. Folke has a guarantor. Dagny has a repayment grade of 75. Folke is not overdrawn. Folke is creditworthy. Bastien has a repayment grade of 35. Dagny is not underwritten. Bastien is not underwritten. Bastien is not employed. Dagny is indebted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is solvent and likewise is overdrawn, so it is bankrupt. No. 2 While the given borrower is employed and likewise has a guarantor, so it is a depositor. No. 3 While the given borrower is employed and likewise is audited and likewise is underwritten, so it is foreclosed. No. 4 While the given borrower is employed and likewise has a repayment grade not above 14 and likewise is overdrawn, so it is garnished. No. 5 While the given borrower is audited, so it is not garnished. No. 6 While the given borrower is employed and likewise is indebted, so it is solvent. No. 7 While the given borrower is indebted, so it is not a depositor. No. 8 While the given borrower is creditworthy, so it is amortized. No. 5 wins over No. 4. No. 7 wins over No. 2. Question: Select what holds for Folke: which option?", "options": ["is solvent", "is foreclosed", "is garnished", "is a depositor"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a depositor", "unit_id": "u008477", "pair_id": "u008477-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008477-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "387d282941d1f9cf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a11", "a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u008489-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is unionized. Sigrid is not certified. Petra is not probationary. Ivo is probationary. Ivo has no portfolio. Ivo is not onboarded. Sigrid is not onboarded. Sigrid is not unionized. Sigrid has a portfolio. Petra is not onboarded. Sigrid is not headhunted. Sigrid is probationary. Ivo is not unionized. Petra is not certified. Ivo is not certified.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is headhunted, it also is bonded. Clause 2: once any candidate has a portfolio, it also is licensed. Clause 3: once any candidate is probationary and also is not unionized, it also is not sponsored. Clause 4: once any candidate is sponsored and also is not unionized, it also is not relocating. Clause 5: once any candidate is sponsored and also is unionized, it also is relocating. Clause 6: once any candidate is certified and also is headhunted, it also is a graduate. Clause 7: once any candidate is bonded, it also is sponsored. Clause 7 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is freelance and also is not onboarded. Clause 7 overrides Clause 3. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Sigrid is relocating?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008489", "pair_id": "u008489-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008489-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b9a647b00c13b901", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 54}}
{"id": "syn-u008489-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is unionized. Sigrid is not certified. Petra is not probationary. Ivo is probationary. Ivo has no portfolio. Ivo is not onboarded. Sigrid is not onboarded. Sigrid is not unionized. Sigrid has a portfolio. Petra is not onboarded. Sigrid is not headhunted. Sigrid is probationary. Ivo is not unionized. Petra is not certified. Ivo is not certified.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is headhunted, it also is bonded. Clause 2: once any candidate has a portfolio, it also is licensed. Clause 3: once any candidate is probationary and also is unionized, it also is not sponsored. Clause 4: once any candidate is sponsored and also is not unionized, it also is not relocating. Clause 5: once any candidate is sponsored and also is unionized, it also is relocating. Clause 6: once any candidate is certified and also is headhunted, it also is a graduate. Clause 7: once any candidate is bonded, it also is sponsored. Clause 7 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is freelance and also is not onboarded. Clause 7 overrides Clause 3. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Sigrid is relocating?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008489", "pair_id": "u008489-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008489-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "279504bd88378223", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 54}}
{"id": "syn-u008489-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is unionized. Sigrid is not certified. Petra is not probationary. Ivo is probationary. Ivo has no portfolio. Ivo is not onboarded. Sigrid is not onboarded. Sigrid is not unionized. Sigrid has a portfolio. Petra is not onboarded. Sigrid is not headhunted. Sigrid is probationary. Ivo is not unionized. Petra is not certified. Ivo is not certified.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is headhunted, that candidate is bonded. Item B. When the candidate has a portfolio, that candidate is licensed. Item C. When the candidate is probationary, and is not unionized, that candidate is not sponsored. Item D. When the candidate is sponsored, and is not unionized, that candidate is not relocating. Item E. When the candidate is sponsored, and is unionized, that candidate is relocating. Item F. When the candidate is certified, and is headhunted, that candidate is a graduate. Item G. When the candidate is bonded, that candidate is sponsored. Item G is suspended when the candidate is freelance, and is not onboarded. Item G outranks Item C. Item E outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Sigrid is relocating?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008489", "pair_id": "u008489-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008489-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b9a647b00c13b901", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 54}}
{"id": "syn-u008489-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is unionized. Sigrid is not certified. Petra is not probationary. Ivo is probationary. Ivo has no portfolio. Ivo is not onboarded. Sigrid is not onboarded. Sigrid is not unionized. Sigrid has a portfolio. Petra is not onboarded. Sigrid is not headhunted. Sigrid is probationary. Ivo is not unionized. Petra is not certified. Ivo is not certified.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is headhunted, that candidate is bonded. Item B. When the candidate has a portfolio, that candidate is licensed. Item C. When the candidate is probationary, and is unionized, that candidate is not sponsored. Item D. When the candidate is sponsored, and is not unionized, that candidate is not relocating. Item E. When the candidate is sponsored, and is unionized, that candidate is relocating. Item F. When the candidate is certified, and is headhunted, that candidate is a graduate. Item G. When the candidate is bonded, that candidate is sponsored. Item G is suspended when the candidate is freelance, and is not onboarded. Item G outranks Item C. Item E outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Sigrid is relocating?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008489", "pair_id": "u008489-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008489-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "279504bd88378223", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 54}}
{"id": "syn-u008495-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Basalt has no feature toggle. Gneiss has a defect tally of 78. Gneiss has a test yield of 53.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is not merged provided that it has a test yield of 50 or lower. Section 2: a build is localized provided that it has a defect tally of 34 or higher. Section 3: a build is minified provided that it is tagged. Section 4: a build has a changelog provided that it has no feature toggle. Section 5: a build is tagged provided that it is localized. Section 6: a build has a security advisory provided that it is flaky. Section 7: a build is flaky provided that it is not documented. Section 8: a build is not documented provided that it has a defect tally lower than 34. Question: Which statement fits Gneiss?", "options": ["has a security advisory", "is minified"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u008495", "pair_id": "u008495-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008495-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d0f1d003d7653570", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008495-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Basalt has no feature toggle. Gneiss has a defect tally of 78. Gneiss has a test yield of 17.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is not merged provided that it has a test yield of 50 or lower. Section 2: a build is localized provided that it has a defect tally of 34 or higher. Section 3: a build is minified provided that it is tagged. Section 4: a build has a changelog provided that it has no feature toggle. Section 5: a build is tagged provided that it is localized. Section 6: a build has a security advisory provided that it is flaky. Section 7: a build is flaky provided that it is not documented. Section 8: a build is not documented provided that it has a defect tally lower than 34. Question: Which statement fits Gneiss?", "options": ["has a security advisory", "is minified"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u008495", "pair_id": "u008495-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008495-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1bf4e4527755a509", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008495-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Basalt has no feature toggle. Gneiss has a defect tally of 78. Gneiss has a test yield of 53.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a test yield no higher than 50: then it is not merged. Policy II. Suppose that build has a defect tally no lower than 34: then it is localized. Policy III. Suppose that build is tagged: then it is minified. Policy IV. Suppose that build has no feature toggle: then it has a changelog. Policy V. Suppose that build is localized: then it is tagged. Policy VI. Suppose that build is flaky: then it has a security advisory. Policy VII. Suppose that build is not documented: then it is flaky. Policy VIII. Suppose that build has a defect tally smaller than 34: then it is not documented. Question: Which choice is right for Gneiss?", "options": ["has a security advisory", "is minified"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u008495", "pair_id": "u008495-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008495-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d0f1d003d7653570", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008495-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Basalt has no feature toggle. Gneiss has a defect tally of 78. Gneiss has a test yield of 17.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a test yield no higher than 50: then it is not merged. Policy II. Suppose that build has a defect tally no lower than 34: then it is localized. Policy III. Suppose that build is tagged: then it is minified. Policy IV. Suppose that build has no feature toggle: then it has a changelog. Policy V. Suppose that build is localized: then it is tagged. Policy VI. Suppose that build is flaky: then it has a security advisory. Policy VII. Suppose that build is not documented: then it is flaky. Policy VIII. Suppose that build has a defect tally smaller than 34: then it is not documented. Question: Which choice is right for Gneiss?", "options": ["has a security advisory", "is minified"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u008495", "pair_id": "u008495-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008495-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1bf4e4527755a509", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008495-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Basalt has no feature toggle. Gneiss has a defect tally of 78. Gneiss has a test yield of 53.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a test yield of 50 or below, it then is not merged. #2 Each time a build has a defect tally of 34 or above, it then is localized. #3 Each time a build is tagged, it then is minified. #4 Each time a build has no feature toggle, it then has a changelog. #5 Each time a build is localized, it then is tagged. #6 Each time a build is flaky, it then has a security advisory. #7 Each time a build is not documented, it then is flaky. #8 Each time a build has a defect tally less than 34, it then is not documented. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Gneiss?", "options": ["has a security advisory", "is minified"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u008495", "pair_id": "u008495-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008495-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d0f1d003d7653570", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008495-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Basalt has no feature toggle. Gneiss has a defect tally of 78. Gneiss has a test yield of 17.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a test yield of 50 or below, it then is not merged. #2 Each time a build has a defect tally of 34 or above, it then is localized. #3 Each time a build is tagged, it then is minified. #4 Each time a build has no feature toggle, it then has a changelog. #5 Each time a build is localized, it then is tagged. #6 Each time a build is flaky, it then has a security advisory. #7 Each time a build is not documented, it then is flaky. #8 Each time a build has a defect tally less than 34, it then is not documented. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Gneiss?", "options": ["has a security advisory", "is minified"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u008495", "pair_id": "u008495-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008495-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1bf4e4527755a509", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008510-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar is not linted. Feldspar is merged. Feldspar has a migration script. Feldspar is not reproducible. Mica is not reproducible. Feldspar is flaky. Feldspar is not signed. Mica has a migration script.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is not reproducible: then it is tested. Policy II. Suppose that build is documented plus is linted plus is merged: then it is compiled. Policy III. Suppose that build is linted plus is signed: then it is benchmarked. Policy IV. Suppose that build is documented plus is not linted plus is merged: then it has a security advisory. Policy V. Suppose that build is flaky plus has a migration script: then it is documented. Policy VI. Suppose that build is merged: then it is tagged. Question: Which choice is right for Feldspar?", "options": ["is compiled", "has a security advisory"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a security advisory", "unit_id": "u008510", "pair_id": "u008510-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008510-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "a258c141d7ddffb3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a11", "a10"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008510-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar is linted. Feldspar is merged. Feldspar has a migration script. Feldspar is not reproducible. Mica is not reproducible. Feldspar is flaky. Feldspar is not signed. Mica has a migration script.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is not reproducible: then it is tested. Policy II. Suppose that build is documented plus is linted plus is merged: then it is compiled. Policy III. Suppose that build is linted plus is signed: then it is benchmarked. Policy IV. Suppose that build is documented plus is not linted plus is merged: then it has a security advisory. Policy V. Suppose that build is flaky plus has a migration script: then it is documented. Policy VI. Suppose that build is merged: then it is tagged. Question: Which choice is right for Feldspar?", "options": ["is compiled", "has a security advisory"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u008510", "pair_id": "u008510-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008510-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "62f0c90f1c5259a9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a11", "a10"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008515-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a notice period of 3. Olek is not bilingual. Hedda is not bilingual.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate has a notice period of at least 72, then it is not onboarded. (2) If a candidate is bilingual, then it is not sponsored. (3) If a candidate is interviewed, then it is a graduate. (4) If a candidate is not licensed, then it is interviewed. (5) If a candidate has an aptitude quotient of at least 27, then it is not licensed. (6) If a candidate is not onboarded, then it is not interviewed. (7) If a candidate is licensed, then it is certified. Question: Is it true that Hedda is interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008515", "pair_id": "u008515-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008515-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "43a6be30e597598e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008515-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a notice period of 3. Olek is not bilingual. Hedda has a notice period of 80. Hedda is not bilingual.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate has a notice period of at least 72, then it is not onboarded. (2) If a candidate is bilingual, then it is not sponsored. (3) If a candidate is interviewed, then it is a graduate. (4) If a candidate is not licensed, then it is interviewed. (5) If a candidate has an aptitude quotient of at least 27, then it is not licensed. (6) If a candidate is not onboarded, then it is not interviewed. (7) If a candidate is licensed, then it is certified. Question: Is it true that Hedda is interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008515", "pair_id": "u008515-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008515-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5667bc17177b35c7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008515-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a notice period of 3. Olek is not bilingual. Hedda is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate has a notice period of 72 or more, it also is not onboarded. Clause 2: once any candidate is bilingual, it also is not sponsored. Clause 3: once any candidate is interviewed, it also is a graduate. Clause 4: once any candidate is not licensed, it also is interviewed. Clause 5: once any candidate has an aptitude quotient of 27 or more, it also is not licensed. Clause 6: once any candidate is not onboarded, it also is not interviewed. Clause 7: once any candidate is licensed, it also is certified. Question: Does it follow that Hedda is interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008515", "pair_id": "u008515-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008515-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "43a6be30e597598e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008515-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a notice period of 3. Olek is not bilingual. Hedda has a notice period of 80. Hedda is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate has a notice period of 72 or more, it also is not onboarded. Clause 2: once any candidate is bilingual, it also is not sponsored. Clause 3: once any candidate is interviewed, it also is a graduate. Clause 4: once any candidate is not licensed, it also is interviewed. Clause 5: once any candidate has an aptitude quotient of 27 or more, it also is not licensed. Clause 6: once any candidate is not onboarded, it also is not interviewed. Clause 7: once any candidate is licensed, it also is certified. Question: Does it follow that Hedda is interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008515", "pair_id": "u008515-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008515-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5667bc17177b35c7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008515-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a notice period of 3. Olek is not bilingual. Hedda is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate has a notice period of no less than 72, that candidate is not onboarded. Item B. When the candidate is bilingual, that candidate is not sponsored. Item C. When the candidate is interviewed, that candidate is a graduate. Item D. When the candidate is not licensed, that candidate is interviewed. Item E. When the candidate has an aptitude quotient of no less than 27, that candidate is not licensed. Item F. When the candidate is not onboarded, that candidate is not interviewed. Item G. When the candidate is licensed, that candidate is certified. Question: Can one infer that Hedda is interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008515", "pair_id": "u008515-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008515-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "43a6be30e597598e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008515-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a notice period of 3. Olek is not bilingual. Hedda has a notice period of 80. Hedda is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate has a notice period of no less than 72, that candidate is not onboarded. Item B. When the candidate is bilingual, that candidate is not sponsored. Item C. When the candidate is interviewed, that candidate is a graduate. Item D. When the candidate is not licensed, that candidate is interviewed. Item E. When the candidate has an aptitude quotient of no less than 27, that candidate is not licensed. Item F. When the candidate is not onboarded, that candidate is not interviewed. Item G. When the candidate is licensed, that candidate is certified. Question: Can one infer that Hedda is interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008515", "pair_id": "u008515-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008515-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5667bc17177b35c7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008516-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia has a parcel volume of 68. Liesel is not misrouted. Thilo is fragile. Liesel is not fragile. Liesel has a weight class of 62. Ulla is damaged. Thilo has a postal zone of 96. Saskia has a weight class of 97. Ulla is refrigerated. Saskia is not misrouted. Saskia is sealed. Liesel is refrigerated. Thilo has no waybill. Liesel is scanned. Saskia has a postal zone of 50. Saskia has a waybill. Ulla has a weight class of 15. Saskia is scanned. Liesel is not sealed. Ulla is sealed. Saskia is damaged. Saskia is not refrigerated. Saskia is not fragile. Thilo is sealed. Thilo is misrouted. Saskia is not palletized.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not sealed plus is scanned plus is not misrouted: then it is tracked. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a waybill plus has a weight class no higher than 54 plus has a postal zone no lower than 64: then it is consolidated. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is not hazardous plus has a parcel volume higher than 58: then it has a locker slot. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is not misrouted plus is not fragile plus has a weight class no lower than 63: then it is weighed. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is not hazardous plus has a parcel volume no higher than 58: then it is stamped. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is weighed: then it is not hazardous. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is not hazardous plus is damaged plus is refrigerated: then it is oversized. Policy VII is waived if that parcel is palletized. Policy II is waived if that parcel is fragile. Policy I is waived if that parcel is not refrigerated. Question: Which choice is right for Saskia?", "options": ["is stamped", "has a locker slot", "is oversized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a locker slot", "unit_id": "u008516", "pair_id": "u008516-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008516-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "96b68ba5b590cb70", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a9", "a1"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u008516-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia has a parcel volume of 68. Liesel is not misrouted. Thilo is fragile. Liesel is not fragile. Liesel has a weight class of 28. Ulla is damaged. Thilo has a postal zone of 96. Saskia has a weight class of 97. Ulla is refrigerated. Saskia is not misrouted. Saskia is sealed. Liesel is refrigerated. Thilo has no waybill. Liesel is scanned. Saskia has a postal zone of 50. Saskia has a waybill. Ulla has a weight class of 15. Saskia is scanned. Liesel is not sealed. Ulla is sealed. Saskia is damaged. Saskia is not refrigerated. Saskia is not fragile. Thilo is sealed. Thilo is misrouted. Saskia is not palletized.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not sealed plus is scanned plus is not misrouted: then it is tracked. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a waybill plus has a weight class no higher than 54 plus has a postal zone no lower than 64: then it is consolidated. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is not hazardous plus has a parcel volume higher than 58: then it has a locker slot. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is not misrouted plus is not fragile plus has a weight class no lower than 63: then it is weighed. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is not hazardous plus has a parcel volume no higher than 58: then it is stamped. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is weighed: then it is not hazardous. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is not hazardous plus is damaged plus is refrigerated: then it is oversized. Policy VII is waived if that parcel is palletized. Policy II is waived if that parcel is fragile. Policy I is waived if that parcel is not refrigerated. Question: Which choice is right for Saskia?", "options": ["is stamped", "has a locker slot", "is oversized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a locker slot", "unit_id": "u008516", "pair_id": "u008516-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008516-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9702e97cdc8eb10f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a9", "a1"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u008516-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia has a parcel volume of 68. Liesel is not misrouted. Thilo is fragile. Liesel is not fragile. Liesel has a weight class of 62. Ulla is damaged. Thilo has a postal zone of 96. Saskia has a weight class of 97. Ulla is refrigerated. Saskia is not misrouted. Saskia is sealed. Liesel is refrigerated. Thilo has no waybill. Liesel is scanned. Saskia has a postal zone of 50. Saskia has a waybill. Ulla has a weight class of 15. Saskia is scanned. Liesel is not sealed. Ulla is sealed. Saskia is damaged. Saskia is not refrigerated. Saskia is not fragile. Thilo is sealed. Thilo is misrouted. Saskia is not palletized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is not sealed and additionally is scanned and additionally is not misrouted, it then is tracked. #2 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally has a weight class of 54 or below and additionally has a postal zone of 64 or above, it then is consolidated. #3 Each time a parcel is not hazardous and additionally has a parcel volume greater than 58, it then has a locker slot. #4 Each time a parcel is not misrouted and additionally is not fragile and additionally has a weight class of 63 or above, it then is weighed. #5 Each time a parcel is not hazardous and additionally has a parcel volume of 58 or below, it then is stamped. #6 Each time a parcel is weighed, it then is not hazardous. #7 Each time a parcel is not hazardous and additionally is damaged and additionally is refrigerated, it then is oversized. #7 is set aside if a parcel is palletized. #2 is set aside if a parcel is fragile. #1 is set aside if a parcel is not refrigerated. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Saskia?", "options": ["is stamped", "has a locker slot", "is oversized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a locker slot", "unit_id": "u008516", "pair_id": "u008516-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008516-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "96b68ba5b590cb70", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a9", "a1"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u008516-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia has a parcel volume of 68. Liesel is not misrouted. Thilo is fragile. Liesel is not fragile. Liesel has a weight class of 28. Ulla is damaged. Thilo has a postal zone of 96. Saskia has a weight class of 97. Ulla is refrigerated. Saskia is not misrouted. Saskia is sealed. Liesel is refrigerated. Thilo has no waybill. Liesel is scanned. Saskia has a postal zone of 50. Saskia has a waybill. Ulla has a weight class of 15. Saskia is scanned. Liesel is not sealed. Ulla is sealed. Saskia is damaged. Saskia is not refrigerated. Saskia is not fragile. Thilo is sealed. Thilo is misrouted. Saskia is not palletized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is not sealed and additionally is scanned and additionally is not misrouted, it then is tracked. #2 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally has a weight class of 54 or below and additionally has a postal zone of 64 or above, it then is consolidated. #3 Each time a parcel is not hazardous and additionally has a parcel volume greater than 58, it then has a locker slot. #4 Each time a parcel is not misrouted and additionally is not fragile and additionally has a weight class of 63 or above, it then is weighed. #5 Each time a parcel is not hazardous and additionally has a parcel volume of 58 or below, it then is stamped. #6 Each time a parcel is weighed, it then is not hazardous. #7 Each time a parcel is not hazardous and additionally is damaged and additionally is refrigerated, it then is oversized. #7 is set aside if a parcel is palletized. #2 is set aside if a parcel is fragile. #1 is set aside if a parcel is not refrigerated. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Saskia?", "options": ["is stamped", "has a locker slot", "is oversized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a locker slot", "unit_id": "u008516", "pair_id": "u008516-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008516-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9702e97cdc8eb10f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a9", "a1"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u008522-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren has a debt ratio of 66. Tomas has a repayment grade of 11. Hamid has a debt ratio of 60. Hamid has a lien. Tomas is prequalified. Evren is not pensioned. Hamid has a repayment grade of 81. Tomas has no lien. Hamid is solvent. Tomas has a debt ratio of 15. Evren has a credit rating of 10. Evren is solvent. Tomas is solvent. Evren is prequalified.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is not vetted and further has a debt ratio in excess of 51, it thereby has no guarantor. Point B. If said borrower is not refinanced, it thereby is audited. Point C. If said borrower is solvent, it thereby is refinanced. Point D. If said borrower is prequalified, it thereby is overdrawn. Point E. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby is not vetted. Point F. If said borrower has a debt ratio in excess of 19 and further is pensioned and further has a repayment grade of minimum 57, it thereby is a homeowner. Point G. If said borrower is not vetted and further has a debt ratio of maximum 51 and further is pensioned, it thereby has a guarantor. Point E is cancelled if said borrower has a lien and further has a credit rating of minimum 25. Point B is cancelled if said borrower has a lien. Point G is cancelled if said borrower is solvent and further has no lien. Question: Statement: Evren has no guarantor. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008522", "pair_id": "u008522-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008522-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c05242173b402146", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u008522-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren has a debt ratio of 66. Tomas has a repayment grade of 11. Hamid has a debt ratio of 60. Hamid has a lien. Tomas is prequalified. Evren is not pensioned. Hamid has a repayment grade of 81. Tomas has no lien. Hamid is solvent. Tomas has a debt ratio of 15. Evren has a credit rating of 10. Evren is solvent. Tomas is solvent. Evren is prequalified.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is not vetted and further has a debt ratio in excess of 51, it thereby has no guarantor. Point B. If said borrower is not refinanced, it thereby is audited. Point C. If said borrower is not solvent, it thereby is refinanced. Point D. If said borrower is prequalified, it thereby is overdrawn. Point E. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby is not vetted. Point F. If said borrower has a debt ratio in excess of 19 and further is pensioned and further has a repayment grade of minimum 57, it thereby is a homeowner. Point G. If said borrower is not vetted and further has a debt ratio of maximum 51 and further is pensioned, it thereby has a guarantor. Point E is cancelled if said borrower has a lien and further has a credit rating of minimum 25. Point B is cancelled if said borrower has a lien. Point G is cancelled if said borrower is solvent and further has no lien. Question: Statement: Evren has no guarantor. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008522", "pair_id": "u008522-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008522-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d3664f47b51b24f3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u008522-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren has a debt ratio of 66. Tomas has a repayment grade of 11. Hamid has a debt ratio of 60. Hamid has a lien. Tomas is prequalified. Evren is not pensioned. Hamid has a repayment grade of 81. Tomas has no lien. Hamid is solvent. Tomas has a debt ratio of 15. Evren has a credit rating of 10. Evren is solvent. Tomas is solvent. Evren is prequalified.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is not vetted and likewise has a debt ratio that exceeds 51, so it has no guarantor. No. 2 While the given borrower is not refinanced, so it is audited. No. 3 While the given borrower is solvent, so it is refinanced. No. 4 While the given borrower is prequalified, so it is overdrawn. No. 5 While the given borrower is refinanced, so it is not vetted. No. 6 While the given borrower has a debt ratio that exceeds 19 and likewise is pensioned and likewise has a repayment grade not below 57, so it is a homeowner. No. 7 While the given borrower is not vetted and likewise has a debt ratio not above 51 and likewise is pensioned, so it has a guarantor. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a lien and likewise has a credit rating not below 25. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a lien. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given borrower is solvent and likewise has no lien. Question: Is the claim \"Evren has no guarantor\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008522", "pair_id": "u008522-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008522-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c05242173b402146", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u008522-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren has a debt ratio of 66. Tomas has a repayment grade of 11. Hamid has a debt ratio of 60. Hamid has a lien. Tomas is prequalified. Evren is not pensioned. Hamid has a repayment grade of 81. Tomas has no lien. Hamid is solvent. Tomas has a debt ratio of 15. Evren has a credit rating of 10. Evren is solvent. Tomas is solvent. Evren is prequalified.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is not vetted and likewise has a debt ratio that exceeds 51, so it has no guarantor. No. 2 While the given borrower is not refinanced, so it is audited. No. 3 While the given borrower is not solvent, so it is refinanced. No. 4 While the given borrower is prequalified, so it is overdrawn. No. 5 While the given borrower is refinanced, so it is not vetted. No. 6 While the given borrower has a debt ratio that exceeds 19 and likewise is pensioned and likewise has a repayment grade not below 57, so it is a homeowner. No. 7 While the given borrower is not vetted and likewise has a debt ratio not above 51 and likewise is pensioned, so it has a guarantor. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a lien and likewise has a credit rating not below 25. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a lien. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given borrower is solvent and likewise has no lien. Question: Is the claim \"Evren has no guarantor\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008522", "pair_id": "u008522-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008522-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d3664f47b51b24f3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u008523-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not translational. Capella has a review mark of 72. Kochab is theoretical. Capella has a team size of 18. Kochab has a review mark of 46. Kochab is translational. Capella has a steering committee. Capella has a citation index of 73. Kochab has a milestone total of 79. Capella has a milestone total of 24. Kochab has no steering committee. Capella is theoretical.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has no field site while has a citation index beneath 62, thus it has ethics clearance. Provision 2: when the proposal here has a review mark beyond 47 while has a steering committee, thus it is peer reviewed. Provision 3: when the proposal here has a review mark at or below 54 while is not shortlisted while has a milestone total beyond 89, thus it has industry backing. Provision 4: when the proposal here has a team size at or above 15 while is not shortlisted, thus it has a field site. Provision 5: when the proposal here is longitudinal while is translational while has a field site, thus it is not preregistered. Provision 6: when the proposal here is not theoretical, thus it has seed funding. Provision 7: when the proposal here is longitudinal while is not translational while has a review mark at or below 72, thus it is preregistered. Provision 8: when the proposal here is peer reviewed, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 8 has no effect when the proposal here has a review mark beneath 39 while has a steering committee. Provision 6 has no effect when the proposal here has a review mark at or above 36. Provision 7 has no effect when the proposal here has a review mark at or below 37. Question: Would it be right to say that Capella is preregistered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008523", "pair_id": "u008523-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008523-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a9c40585488505ea", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 26}}
{"id": "syn-u008523-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not translational. Capella has a review mark of 72. Kochab is theoretical. Capella has a team size of 18. Kochab has a review mark of 46. Kochab is translational. Capella has a steering committee. Capella has a citation index of 73. Kochab has a milestone total of 79. Capella has a milestone total of 24. Kochab has no steering committee. Capella is theoretical.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has no field site while has a citation index beneath 62, thus it has ethics clearance. Provision 2: when the proposal here has a review mark beyond 47 while has a steering committee, thus it is peer reviewed. Provision 3: when the proposal here has a review mark at or below 54 while is not shortlisted while has a milestone total beyond 89, thus it has industry backing. Provision 4: when the proposal here has a team size at or above 15 while is not shortlisted, thus it has a field site. Provision 5: when the proposal here is longitudinal while is translational while has a field site, thus it is not preregistered. Provision 6: when the proposal here is not theoretical, thus it has seed funding. Provision 7: when the proposal here is longitudinal while is not translational while has a review mark at or below 66, thus it is preregistered. Provision 8: when the proposal here is peer reviewed, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 8 has no effect when the proposal here has a review mark beneath 39 while has a steering committee. Provision 6 has no effect when the proposal here has a review mark at or above 36. Provision 7 has no effect when the proposal here has a review mark at or below 37. Question: Would it be right to say that Capella is preregistered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008523", "pair_id": "u008523-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008523-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f13c5969841d02cd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 26}}
{"id": "syn-u008523-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not translational. Capella has a review mark of 72. Kochab is theoretical. Capella has a team size of 18. Kochab has a review mark of 46. Kochab is translational. Capella has a steering committee. Capella has a citation index of 73. Kochab has a milestone total of 79. Capella has a milestone total of 24. Kochab has no steering committee. Capella is theoretical.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has no field site and likewise has a citation index that falls below 62, so it has ethics clearance. No. 2 While the given proposal has a review mark that exceeds 47 and likewise has a steering committee, so it is peer reviewed. No. 3 While the given proposal has a review mark not above 54 and likewise is not shortlisted and likewise has a milestone total that exceeds 89, so it has industry backing. No. 4 While the given proposal has a team size not below 15 and likewise is not shortlisted, so it has a field site. No. 5 While the given proposal is longitudinal and likewise is translational and likewise has a field site, so it is not preregistered. No. 6 While the given proposal is not theoretical, so it has seed funding. No. 7 While the given proposal is longitudinal and likewise is not translational and likewise has a review mark not above 72, so it is preregistered. No. 8 While the given proposal is peer reviewed, so it is longitudinal. No. 8 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a review mark that falls below 39 and likewise has a steering committee. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a review mark not below 36. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a review mark not above 37. Question: Is the claim \"Capella is preregistered\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008523", "pair_id": "u008523-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008523-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a9c40585488505ea", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 26}}
{"id": "syn-u008523-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not translational. Capella has a review mark of 72. Kochab is theoretical. Capella has a team size of 18. Kochab has a review mark of 46. Kochab is translational. Capella has a steering committee. Capella has a citation index of 73. Kochab has a milestone total of 79. Capella has a milestone total of 24. Kochab has no steering committee. Capella is theoretical.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has no field site and likewise has a citation index that falls below 62, so it has ethics clearance. No. 2 While the given proposal has a review mark that exceeds 47 and likewise has a steering committee, so it is peer reviewed. No. 3 While the given proposal has a review mark not above 54 and likewise is not shortlisted and likewise has a milestone total that exceeds 89, so it has industry backing. No. 4 While the given proposal has a team size not below 15 and likewise is not shortlisted, so it has a field site. No. 5 While the given proposal is longitudinal and likewise is translational and likewise has a field site, so it is not preregistered. No. 6 While the given proposal is not theoretical, so it has seed funding. No. 7 While the given proposal is longitudinal and likewise is not translational and likewise has a review mark not above 66, so it is preregistered. No. 8 While the given proposal is peer reviewed, so it is longitudinal. No. 8 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a review mark that falls below 39 and likewise has a steering committee. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a review mark not below 36. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a review mark not above 37. Question: Is the claim \"Capella is preregistered\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008523", "pair_id": "u008523-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008523-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f13c5969841d02cd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 26}}
{"id": "syn-u008534-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is grandfathered. Edda is grandfathered. Yara has roadside assistance. Yara has no dashcam. Bruno has no roadside assistance. Bruno has no dashcam.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is litigated, thus it has a deductible waiver. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is a claimant. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is not litigated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is indemnified, thus it is litigated. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a dashcam, thus it is indemnified. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is indemnified, thus it is covered. Question: Would it be right to say that Yara is litigated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008534", "pair_id": "u008534-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008534-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "62fc9229c43fed71", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008534-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is grandfathered. Edda is grandfathered. Yara has roadside assistance. Yara has no dashcam. Bruno has no roadside assistance. Bruno has no dashcam.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is litigated, thus it has a deductible waiver. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is a claimant. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is not litigated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is indemnified, thus it is litigated. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a dashcam, thus it is indemnified. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is grandfathered, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is indemnified, thus it is covered. Question: Would it be right to say that Yara is litigated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008534", "pair_id": "u008534-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008534-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "e7be888e4e7e6a86", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008534-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is grandfathered. Edda is grandfathered. Yara has roadside assistance. Yara has no dashcam. Bruno has no roadside assistance. Bruno has no dashcam.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is litigated, it thereby has a deductible waiver. Point B. If said policyholder has roadside assistance, it thereby is a claimant. Point C. If said policyholder is a claimant, it thereby is not litigated. Point D. If said policyholder is indemnified, it thereby is litigated. Point E. If said policyholder has a dashcam, it thereby is indemnified. Point F. If said policyholder is indemnified, it thereby is covered. Question: Statement: Yara is litigated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008534", "pair_id": "u008534-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008534-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "62fc9229c43fed71", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008534-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is grandfathered. Edda is grandfathered. Yara has roadside assistance. Yara has no dashcam. Bruno has no roadside assistance. Bruno has no dashcam.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is litigated, it thereby has a deductible waiver. Point B. If said policyholder has roadside assistance, it thereby is a claimant. Point C. If said policyholder is a claimant, it thereby is not litigated. Point D. If said policyholder is indemnified, it thereby is litigated. Point E. If said policyholder has a dashcam, it thereby is indemnified. Point F. If said policyholder is grandfathered, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point G. If said policyholder is indemnified, it thereby is covered. Question: Statement: Yara is litigated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008534", "pair_id": "u008534-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008534-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "e7be888e4e7e6a86", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008534-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is grandfathered. Edda is grandfathered. Yara has roadside assistance. Yara has no dashcam. Bruno has no roadside assistance. Bruno has no dashcam.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is litigated, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 2 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it is a claimant. No. 3 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is not litigated. No. 4 While the given policyholder is indemnified, so it is litigated. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is indemnified. No. 6 While the given policyholder is indemnified, so it is covered. Question: Is the claim \"Yara is litigated\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008534", "pair_id": "u008534-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008534-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "62fc9229c43fed71", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008534-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is grandfathered. Edda is grandfathered. Yara has roadside assistance. Yara has no dashcam. Bruno has no roadside assistance. Bruno has no dashcam.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is litigated, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 2 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it is a claimant. No. 3 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is not litigated. No. 4 While the given policyholder is indemnified, so it is litigated. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is indemnified. No. 6 While the given policyholder is grandfathered, so it has a beneficiary. No. 7 While the given policyholder is indemnified, so it is covered. Question: Is the claim \"Yara is litigated\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008534", "pair_id": "u008534-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008534-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "e7be888e4e7e6a86", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008542-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar has a CPU quota of 47. Vesper is not replicated. Quasar is sandboxed. Quasar has a latency budget of 31. Quasar is not stateless. Nimbus is sandboxed. Vesper has a latency budget of 88. Quasar is cached. Nimbus is not cached. Nimbus has a CPU quota of 52. Vesper is not cached.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is cached and likewise has a CPU quota that falls below 51, so it is not deprecated. No. 2 While the given workload is sandboxed and likewise has a CPU quota that exceeds 46 and likewise is stateless, so it is not virtualized. No. 3 While the given workload is sandboxed and likewise has a CPU quota not above 46, so it is virtualized. No. 4 While the given workload has a latency budget that falls below 55 and likewise is stateless and likewise is replicated, so it has a dedicated host. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload is stateless and likewise is sandboxed. Question: Is the claim \"Quasar is virtualized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008542", "pair_id": "u008542-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008542-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ce4832ce91242cff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008542-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar has a CPU quota of 47. Vesper is not replicated. Quasar is sandboxed. Quasar has a latency budget of 31. Quasar is not stateless. Nimbus is sandboxed. Vesper has a latency budget of 88. Quasar is cached. Nimbus is not cached. Nimbus has a CPU quota of 52. Vesper is not cached.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is cached and likewise has a CPU quota that falls below 22, so it is not deprecated. No. 2 While the given workload is sandboxed and likewise has a CPU quota that exceeds 46 and likewise is stateless, so it is not virtualized. No. 3 While the given workload is sandboxed and likewise has a CPU quota not above 46, so it is virtualized. No. 4 While the given workload has a latency budget that falls below 55 and likewise is stateless and likewise is replicated, so it has a dedicated host. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload is stateless and likewise is sandboxed. Question: Is the claim \"Quasar is virtualized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008542", "pair_id": "u008542-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008542-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cc62aad97d3e791a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008620-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is employed. Evren is not prequalified. Evren has a mortgage. Evren has no guarantor. Evren has no escrow account.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is prequalified, it then is solvent. #2 Each time a borrower has a mortgage, it then is vetted. #3 Each time a borrower has a guarantor, it then is amortized. #4 Each time a borrower has a mortgage, it then is not amortized. #5 Each time a borrower has a guarantor, it then is garnished. #6 Each time a borrower is employed, it then is not garnished. #7 Each time a borrower has no escrow account, it then is not vetted. #4 yields to #3. #2 yields to #7. #6 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Evren is vetted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008620", "pair_id": "u008620-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008620-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6e60cf45b74b221d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008620-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is employed. Evren is not prequalified. Evren has a mortgage. Evren has no guarantor. Evren has no escrow account.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is prequalified, it then is solvent. #2 Each time a borrower has a mortgage, it then is vetted. #3 Each time a borrower has a guarantor, it then is amortized. #4 Each time a borrower has a mortgage, it then is not amortized. #5 Each time a borrower has a guarantor, it then is garnished. #6 Each time a borrower is employed, it then is not garnished. #7 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then is not vetted. #4 yields to #3. #2 yields to #7. #6 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Evren is vetted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008620", "pair_id": "u008620-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008620-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "7d3745bc6d75d6c3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008639-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Una has a peril factor of 50. Dmitri is not a smoker. Dmitri has a claim frequency of 77. Una has a claim frequency of 96. Una is a smoker. Dmitri is not appraised. Fabian has roadside assistance. Una is reimbursed. Una is appraised. Fabian has a claim frequency of 59. Una is not bundled. Una has roadside assistance. Fabian is a smoker.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 87 and is not a smoker, then it has a rider. (2) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 87 and is bundled, then it is covered. (3) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 87 and has a payout ceiling above 12, then it is disputed. (4) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 87 and has a payout ceiling of at most 12 and is not uninsurable, then it has an adjuster. (5) If a policyholder has roadside assistance and is reimbursed, then it has a beneficiary. (6) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 87 and is not bundled and is appraised, then it is retired. (7) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 87 and has a claim frequency of at most 67, then it is inspected. (8) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 87 and has a claim frequency above 67 and has a payout ceiling of at least 80, then it has flood coverage. Question: Which option holds for Una?", "options": ["has a rider", "has flood coverage", "is covered", "is disputed", "has an adjuster", "is inspected", "is retired"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u008639", "pair_id": "u008639-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008639-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "6aa190f7fca8783e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a4", "a9", "a2", "a12", "a3", "a13"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u008639-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Una has a peril factor of 50. Dmitri is not a smoker. Dmitri has a claim frequency of 77. Una has a claim frequency of 96. Una is a smoker. Dmitri is not appraised. Fabian has roadside assistance. Una is not reimbursed. Una is appraised. Fabian has a claim frequency of 59. Una is not bundled. Una has roadside assistance. Fabian is a smoker.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 87 and is not a smoker, then it has a rider. (2) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 87 and is bundled, then it is covered. (3) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 87 and has a payout ceiling above 12, then it is disputed. (4) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 87 and has a payout ceiling of at most 12 and is not uninsurable, then it has an adjuster. (5) If a policyholder has roadside assistance and is reimbursed, then it has a beneficiary. (6) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 87 and is not bundled and is appraised, then it is retired. (7) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 87 and has a claim frequency of at most 67, then it is inspected. (8) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 87 and has a claim frequency above 67 and has a payout ceiling of at least 80, then it has flood coverage. Question: Which option holds for Una?", "options": ["has a rider", "has flood coverage", "is covered", "is disputed", "has an adjuster", "is inspected", "is retired"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u008639", "pair_id": "u008639-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008639-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "390baa9a4f05ce51", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a4", "a9", "a2", "a12", "a3", "a13"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u008639-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Una has a peril factor of 50. Dmitri is not a smoker. Dmitri has a claim frequency of 77. Una has a claim frequency of 96. Una is a smoker. Dmitri is not appraised. Fabian has roadside assistance. Una is reimbursed. Una is appraised. Fabian has a claim frequency of 59. Una is not bundled. Una has roadside assistance. Fabian is a smoker.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 87 and also is not a smoker, it also has a rider. Clause 2: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 87 and also is bundled, it also is covered. Clause 3: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 87 and also has a payout ceiling over 12, it also is disputed. Clause 4: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 87 and also has a payout ceiling of 12 or less and also is not uninsurable, it also has an adjuster. Clause 5: once any policyholder has roadside assistance and also is reimbursed, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 6: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 87 and also is not bundled and also is appraised, it also is retired. Clause 7: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 87 and also has a claim frequency of 67 or less, it also is inspected. Clause 8: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 87 and also has a claim frequency over 67 and also has a payout ceiling of 80 or more, it also has flood coverage. Question: Which of these is true of Una?", "options": ["has a rider", "has flood coverage", "is covered", "is disputed", "has an adjuster", "is inspected", "is retired"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u008639", "pair_id": "u008639-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008639-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "6aa190f7fca8783e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a4", "a9", "a2", "a12", "a3", "a13"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u008639-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Una has a peril factor of 50. Dmitri is not a smoker. Dmitri has a claim frequency of 77. Una has a claim frequency of 96. Una is a smoker. Dmitri is not appraised. Fabian has roadside assistance. Una is not reimbursed. Una is appraised. Fabian has a claim frequency of 59. Una is not bundled. Una has roadside assistance. Fabian is a smoker.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 87 and also is not a smoker, it also has a rider. Clause 2: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 87 and also is bundled, it also is covered. Clause 3: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 87 and also has a payout ceiling over 12, it also is disputed. Clause 4: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 87 and also has a payout ceiling of 12 or less and also is not uninsurable, it also has an adjuster. Clause 5: once any policyholder has roadside assistance and also is reimbursed, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 6: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 87 and also is not bundled and also is appraised, it also is retired. Clause 7: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 87 and also has a claim frequency of 67 or less, it also is inspected. Clause 8: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 87 and also has a claim frequency over 67 and also has a payout ceiling of 80 or more, it also has flood coverage. Question: Which of these is true of Una?", "options": ["has a rider", "has flood coverage", "is covered", "is disputed", "has an adjuster", "is inspected", "is retired"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u008639", "pair_id": "u008639-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008639-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "390baa9a4f05ce51", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a4", "a9", "a2", "a12", "a3", "a13"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u008649-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not versioned. Zircon is not backported.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is tested provided that it is not versioned. Section 1 lapses for a build if it is versioned. Question: Zircon is backported. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008649", "pair_id": "u008649-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008649-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fcb498394f6f5239", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008649-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not versioned. Zircon is backported.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is tested provided that it is not versioned. Section 1 lapses for a build if it is versioned. Question: Zircon is backported. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008649", "pair_id": "u008649-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008649-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ea4e01bbd751dba4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008649-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not versioned. Zircon is not backported.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is not versioned: then it is tested. Policy I is waived if that build is versioned. Question: Is it so that Zircon is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008649", "pair_id": "u008649-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008649-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fcb498394f6f5239", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008649-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not versioned. Zircon is backported.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is not versioned: then it is tested. Policy I is waived if that build is versioned. Question: Is it so that Zircon is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008649", "pair_id": "u008649-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008649-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ea4e01bbd751dba4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008760-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is not litigated. Bruno is not appraised. Edda has no beneficiary. Bruno has no beneficiary. Bruno has no deductible waiver. Edda is appraised. Bruno is litigated. Bruno has flood coverage.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is appraised and likewise is litigated and likewise has a deductible waiver, so it is inspected. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a beneficiary, so it is reimbursed. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not appraised and likewise has flood coverage, so it is not inspected. Question: Is the claim \"Bruno is inspected\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008760", "pair_id": "u008760-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008760-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "f435b07fa93c724d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u008760-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is not litigated. Bruno is not appraised. Edda has no beneficiary. Bruno has no beneficiary. Bruno has no deductible waiver. Edda is appraised. Bruno is litigated. Bruno has flood coverage.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is appraised and likewise is litigated and likewise has a deductible waiver, so it is inspected. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a beneficiary, so it is reimbursed. No. 3 While the given policyholder is appraised and likewise has flood coverage, so it is not inspected. Question: Is the claim \"Bruno is inspected\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008760", "pair_id": "u008760-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008760-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "da1619217307ace9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u008774-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is isolated. Halcyon is stateless. Nimbus is not monitored. Orrery is not virtualized. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Orrery is sandboxed. Orrery is monitored. Nimbus is mirrored. Orrery has a dedicated host. Halcyon is isolated. Halcyon has a dedicated host. Halcyon is monitored. Halcyon is not mirrored. Nimbus is not virtualized. Nimbus has no dedicated host. Orrery is mirrored. Orrery is stateless.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is monitored while is stateless, thus it is throttled. Provision 2: when the workload here is autoscaled while is sandboxed, thus it is sharded. Provision 3: when the workload here is provisioned while is isolated while is replicated, thus it has a snapshot. Provision 4: when the workload here is sandboxed, thus it is backed up. Provision 5: when the workload here is provisioned while has a dedicated host while is virtualized, thus it has no snapshot. Provision 6: when the workload here is isolated, thus it is replicated. Provision 7: when the workload here is throttled while is sandboxed while is stateless, thus it is provisioned. Provision 8: when the workload here is mirrored, thus it is deprecated. Question: Would it be right to say that Orrery has a snapshot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008774", "pair_id": "u008774-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008774-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "1b805d7ba0141fe0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008774-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is isolated. Halcyon is stateless. Nimbus is not monitored. Orrery is not virtualized. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Orrery is sandboxed. Orrery is monitored. Nimbus is mirrored. Orrery has a dedicated host. Halcyon is isolated. Halcyon has a dedicated host. Halcyon is monitored. Halcyon is not mirrored. Nimbus is not virtualized. Nimbus has no dedicated host. Orrery is not mirrored. Orrery is stateless.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is monitored while is stateless, thus it is throttled. Provision 2: when the workload here is autoscaled while is sandboxed, thus it is sharded. Provision 3: when the workload here is provisioned while is isolated while is replicated, thus it has a snapshot. Provision 4: when the workload here is sandboxed, thus it is backed up. Provision 5: when the workload here is provisioned while has a dedicated host while is virtualized, thus it has no snapshot. Provision 6: when the workload here is isolated, thus it is replicated. Provision 7: when the workload here is throttled while is sandboxed while is stateless, thus it is provisioned. Provision 8: when the workload here is mirrored, thus it is deprecated. Question: Would it be right to say that Orrery has a snapshot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008774", "pair_id": "u008774-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008774-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "4d82ce2045196cc2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008774-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is isolated. Halcyon is stateless. Nimbus is not monitored. Orrery is not virtualized. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Orrery is sandboxed. Orrery is monitored. Nimbus is mirrored. Orrery has a dedicated host. Halcyon is isolated. Halcyon has a dedicated host. Halcyon is monitored. Halcyon is not mirrored. Nimbus is not virtualized. Nimbus has no dedicated host. Orrery is mirrored. Orrery is stateless.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is monitored and further is stateless, it thereby is throttled. Point B. If said workload is autoscaled and further is sandboxed, it thereby is sharded. Point C. If said workload is provisioned and further is isolated and further is replicated, it thereby has a snapshot. Point D. If said workload is sandboxed, it thereby is backed up. Point E. If said workload is provisioned and further has a dedicated host and further is virtualized, it thereby has no snapshot. Point F. If said workload is isolated, it thereby is replicated. Point G. If said workload is throttled and further is sandboxed and further is stateless, it thereby is provisioned. Point H. If said workload is mirrored, it thereby is deprecated. Question: Statement: Orrery has a snapshot. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008774", "pair_id": "u008774-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008774-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "1b805d7ba0141fe0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008774-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is isolated. Halcyon is stateless. Nimbus is not monitored. Orrery is not virtualized. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Orrery is sandboxed. Orrery is monitored. Nimbus is mirrored. Orrery has a dedicated host. Halcyon is isolated. Halcyon has a dedicated host. Halcyon is monitored. Halcyon is not mirrored. Nimbus is not virtualized. Nimbus has no dedicated host. Orrery is not mirrored. Orrery is stateless.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is monitored and further is stateless, it thereby is throttled. Point B. If said workload is autoscaled and further is sandboxed, it thereby is sharded. Point C. If said workload is provisioned and further is isolated and further is replicated, it thereby has a snapshot. Point D. If said workload is sandboxed, it thereby is backed up. Point E. If said workload is provisioned and further has a dedicated host and further is virtualized, it thereby has no snapshot. Point F. If said workload is isolated, it thereby is replicated. Point G. If said workload is throttled and further is sandboxed and further is stateless, it thereby is provisioned. Point H. If said workload is mirrored, it thereby is deprecated. Question: Statement: Orrery has a snapshot. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008774", "pair_id": "u008774-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008774-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "4d82ce2045196cc2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008774-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is isolated. Halcyon is stateless. Nimbus is not monitored. Orrery is not virtualized. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Orrery is sandboxed. Orrery is monitored. Nimbus is mirrored. Orrery has a dedicated host. Halcyon is isolated. Halcyon has a dedicated host. Halcyon is monitored. Halcyon is not mirrored. Nimbus is not virtualized. Nimbus has no dedicated host. Orrery is mirrored. Orrery is stateless.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is monitored and likewise is stateless, so it is throttled. No. 2 While the given workload is autoscaled and likewise is sandboxed, so it is sharded. No. 3 While the given workload is provisioned and likewise is isolated and likewise is replicated, so it has a snapshot. No. 4 While the given workload is sandboxed, so it is backed up. No. 5 While the given workload is provisioned and likewise has a dedicated host and likewise is virtualized, so it has no snapshot. No. 6 While the given workload is isolated, so it is replicated. No. 7 While the given workload is throttled and likewise is sandboxed and likewise is stateless, so it is provisioned. No. 8 While the given workload is mirrored, so it is deprecated. Question: Is the claim \"Orrery has a snapshot\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008774", "pair_id": "u008774-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008774-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "1b805d7ba0141fe0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008774-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is isolated. Halcyon is stateless. Nimbus is not monitored. Orrery is not virtualized. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Orrery is sandboxed. Orrery is monitored. Nimbus is mirrored. Orrery has a dedicated host. Halcyon is isolated. Halcyon has a dedicated host. Halcyon is monitored. Halcyon is not mirrored. Nimbus is not virtualized. Nimbus has no dedicated host. Orrery is not mirrored. Orrery is stateless.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is monitored and likewise is stateless, so it is throttled. No. 2 While the given workload is autoscaled and likewise is sandboxed, so it is sharded. No. 3 While the given workload is provisioned and likewise is isolated and likewise is replicated, so it has a snapshot. No. 4 While the given workload is sandboxed, so it is backed up. No. 5 While the given workload is provisioned and likewise has a dedicated host and likewise is virtualized, so it has no snapshot. No. 6 While the given workload is isolated, so it is replicated. No. 7 While the given workload is throttled and likewise is sandboxed and likewise is stateless, so it is provisioned. No. 8 While the given workload is mirrored, so it is deprecated. Question: Is the claim \"Orrery has a snapshot\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008774", "pair_id": "u008774-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008774-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "4d82ce2045196cc2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008789-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has no guarantor. Corin has no mortgage. Corin is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower has a lien, that borrower has an escrow account. Item B. When the borrower has a mortgage, that borrower is overdrawn. Item C. When the borrower is not prequalified, that borrower has no escrow account. Item D. When the borrower has no guarantor, that borrower is a homeowner. Item E. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower has a lien. Item F. When the borrower is not foreclosed, that borrower is audited. Question: Can one infer that Corin has an escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008789", "pair_id": "u008789-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008789-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "ba45e2047ca5dc93", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008789-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has no guarantor. Corin has no mortgage. Corin is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower has a lien, that borrower has an escrow account. Item B. When the borrower has a mortgage, that borrower is overdrawn. Item C. When the borrower is not prequalified, that borrower has no escrow account. Item D. When the borrower has no guarantor, that borrower is a homeowner. Item E. When the borrower is a homeowner, that borrower is not prequalified. Item F. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower has a lien. Item G. When the borrower is not foreclosed, that borrower is audited. Question: Can one infer that Corin has an escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008789", "pair_id": "u008789-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008789-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "39233151899b853b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008798-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Juno is not encrypted. Juno has a memory allotment of 6. Juno has a latency budget of 7. Tundra is encrypted. Juno has a replica count of 44. Tundra is not deprecated. Tundra has a latency budget of 25.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload has a replica count of at least 44, then it is virtualized. (2) If a workload has a latency budget above 80, then it is isolated. (3) If a workload is encrypted, then it is idle. (4) If a workload is not encrypted, then it has a GPU. (5) If a workload is idle, then it is patched. (6) If a workload has a memory allotment of at least 60, then it is stateless. (7) If a workload has a replica count below 44, then it has a public endpoint. (8) If a workload is encrypted, then it has a snapshot. (9) If a workload is deprecated, then it is not sandboxed. (10) If a workload has a memory allotment below 60, then it is throttled. Question: Which option holds for Tundra?", "options": ["is virtualized", "is isolated", "is throttled", "is idle", "has a GPU", "is stateless", "has a public endpoint"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is idle", "unit_id": "u008798", "pair_id": "u008798-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008798-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d21a728b18eb3f0e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a2", "a6", "a9", "a3", "a8", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008798-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Juno is not encrypted. Juno has a memory allotment of 6. Juno has a latency budget of 7. Tundra is not encrypted. Juno has a replica count of 44. Tundra is not deprecated. Tundra has a latency budget of 25.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload has a replica count of at least 44, then it is virtualized. (2) If a workload has a latency budget above 80, then it is isolated. (3) If a workload is encrypted, then it is idle. (4) If a workload is not encrypted, then it has a GPU. (5) If a workload is idle, then it is patched. (6) If a workload has a memory allotment of at least 60, then it is stateless. (7) If a workload has a replica count below 44, then it has a public endpoint. (8) If a workload is encrypted, then it has a snapshot. (9) If a workload is deprecated, then it is not sandboxed. (10) If a workload has a memory allotment below 60, then it is throttled. Question: Which option holds for Tundra?", "options": ["is virtualized", "is isolated", "is throttled", "is idle", "has a GPU", "is stateless", "has a public endpoint"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a GPU", "unit_id": "u008798", "pair_id": "u008798-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008798-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d947b7d81afaaa85", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a2", "a6", "a9", "a3", "a8", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008798-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Juno is not encrypted. Juno has a memory allotment of 6. Juno has a latency budget of 7. Tundra is encrypted. Juno has a replica count of 44. Tundra is not deprecated. Tundra has a latency budget of 25.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload has a replica count of 44 or more, it also is virtualized. Clause 2: once any workload has a latency budget over 80, it also is isolated. Clause 3: once any workload is encrypted, it also is idle. Clause 4: once any workload is not encrypted, it also has a GPU. Clause 5: once any workload is idle, it also is patched. Clause 6: once any workload has a memory allotment of 60 or more, it also is stateless. Clause 7: once any workload has a replica count under 44, it also has a public endpoint. Clause 8: once any workload is encrypted, it also has a snapshot. Clause 9: once any workload is deprecated, it also is not sandboxed. Clause 10: once any workload has a memory allotment under 60, it also is throttled. Question: Which of these is true of Tundra?", "options": ["is virtualized", "is isolated", "is throttled", "is idle", "has a GPU", "is stateless", "has a public endpoint"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is idle", "unit_id": "u008798", "pair_id": "u008798-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008798-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d21a728b18eb3f0e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a2", "a6", "a9", "a3", "a8", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008798-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Juno is not encrypted. Juno has a memory allotment of 6. Juno has a latency budget of 7. Tundra is not encrypted. Juno has a replica count of 44. Tundra is not deprecated. Tundra has a latency budget of 25.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload has a replica count of 44 or more, it also is virtualized. Clause 2: once any workload has a latency budget over 80, it also is isolated. Clause 3: once any workload is encrypted, it also is idle. Clause 4: once any workload is not encrypted, it also has a GPU. Clause 5: once any workload is idle, it also is patched. Clause 6: once any workload has a memory allotment of 60 or more, it also is stateless. Clause 7: once any workload has a replica count under 44, it also has a public endpoint. Clause 8: once any workload is encrypted, it also has a snapshot. Clause 9: once any workload is deprecated, it also is not sandboxed. Clause 10: once any workload has a memory allotment under 60, it also is throttled. Question: Which of these is true of Tundra?", "options": ["is virtualized", "is isolated", "is throttled", "is idle", "has a GPU", "is stateless", "has a public endpoint"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a GPU", "unit_id": "u008798", "pair_id": "u008798-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008798-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d947b7d81afaaa85", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a2", "a6", "a9", "a3", "a8", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008798-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Juno is not encrypted. Juno has a memory allotment of 6. Juno has a latency budget of 7. Tundra is encrypted. Juno has a replica count of 44. Tundra is not deprecated. Tundra has a latency budget of 25.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload has a replica count of no less than 44, that workload is virtualized. Item B. When the workload has a latency budget of more than 80, that workload is isolated. Item C. When the workload is encrypted, that workload is idle. Item D. When the workload is not encrypted, that workload has a GPU. Item E. When the workload is idle, that workload is patched. Item F. When the workload has a memory allotment of no less than 60, that workload is stateless. Item G. When the workload has a replica count of less than 44, that workload has a public endpoint. Item H. When the workload is encrypted, that workload has a snapshot. Item I. When the workload is deprecated, that workload is not sandboxed. Item J. When the workload has a memory allotment of less than 60, that workload is throttled. Question: What applies to Tundra?", "options": ["is virtualized", "is isolated", "is throttled", "is idle", "has a GPU", "is stateless", "has a public endpoint"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is idle", "unit_id": "u008798", "pair_id": "u008798-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008798-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d21a728b18eb3f0e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a2", "a6", "a9", "a3", "a8", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008798-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Juno is not encrypted. Juno has a memory allotment of 6. Juno has a latency budget of 7. Tundra is not encrypted. Juno has a replica count of 44. Tundra is not deprecated. Tundra has a latency budget of 25.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload has a replica count of no less than 44, that workload is virtualized. Item B. When the workload has a latency budget of more than 80, that workload is isolated. Item C. When the workload is encrypted, that workload is idle. Item D. When the workload is not encrypted, that workload has a GPU. Item E. When the workload is idle, that workload is patched. Item F. When the workload has a memory allotment of no less than 60, that workload is stateless. Item G. When the workload has a replica count of less than 44, that workload has a public endpoint. Item H. When the workload is encrypted, that workload has a snapshot. Item I. When the workload is deprecated, that workload is not sandboxed. Item J. When the workload has a memory allotment of less than 60, that workload is throttled. Question: What applies to Tundra?", "options": ["is virtualized", "is isolated", "is throttled", "is idle", "has a GPU", "is stateless", "has a public endpoint"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a GPU", "unit_id": "u008798", "pair_id": "u008798-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008798-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d947b7d81afaaa85", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a2", "a6", "a9", "a3", "a8", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008817-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra is not isolated. Juno is not sandboxed. Halcyon is sandboxed. Tundra is not idle. Juno is idle. Halcyon is not patched. Tundra is sandboxed. Tundra is not deprecated. Juno is deprecated. Halcyon is not virtualized. Juno is not isolated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a snapshot, it thereby is provisioned. Point B. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby is not throttled. Point C. If said workload is isolated, it thereby is containerized. Point D. If said workload is deprecated, it thereby has no snapshot. Point E. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby is not encrypted. Point F. If said workload is sandboxed, it thereby is encrypted. Point G. If said workload is idle, it thereby has a snapshot. Point H. If said workload is patched, it thereby is not provisioned. Point I. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby is throttled. Point I is cancelled if said workload is sandboxed. Point I is cancelled if said workload is replicated. Point B is cancelled if said workload is virtualized. Point F supersedes Point E. Point G supersedes Point D. Point A supersedes Point H. Point I supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Juno is throttled. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008817", "pair_id": "u008817-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008817-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e2cbd5bf0711abed", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008817-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra is not isolated. Juno is not sandboxed. Halcyon is sandboxed. Tundra is not idle. Juno is idle. Halcyon is not patched. Tundra is sandboxed. Tundra is not deprecated. Juno is deprecated. Halcyon is not virtualized. Juno is not isolated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a snapshot, it thereby is provisioned. Point B. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby is not throttled. Point C. If said workload is isolated, it thereby is containerized. Point D. If said workload is deprecated, it thereby has no snapshot. Point E. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby is not encrypted. Point F. If said workload is sandboxed, it thereby is encrypted. Point G. If said workload is idle, it thereby has a snapshot. Point H. If said workload is patched, it thereby is not provisioned. Point I. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby is throttled. Point I is cancelled if said workload is sandboxed. Point I is cancelled if said workload is replicated. Point B is cancelled if said workload is virtualized. Point F supersedes Point E. Point G supersedes Point D. Point H supersedes Point A. Point I supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Juno is throttled. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008817", "pair_id": "u008817-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u008817-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "de9fbcd3d497db84", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008867-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is not patched. Orrery is containerized. Juno is mirrored. Halcyon has no snapshot. Juno is not virtualized. Halcyon is not containerized. Orrery is not patched. Orrery is not idle. Halcyon is virtualized. Halcyon is idle. Halcyon is not mirrored. Juno has a snapshot. Juno is not containerized.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is not throttled provided that it is not mirrored as well as is idle. Section 2: a workload is provisioned provided that it is not throttled. Section 3: a workload is replicated provided that it is not virtualized. Section 4: a workload is not autoscaled provided that it is throttled as well as is not encrypted as well as is containerized. Section 5: a workload is not replicated provided that it is containerized. Section 6: a workload is autoscaled provided that it is not patched. Section 7: a workload is throttled provided that it is not mirrored as well as is not containerized as well as has a snapshot. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Halcyon is throttled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008867", "pair_id": "u008867-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008867-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "71fcac7c48fbfd52", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008867-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is not patched. Orrery is containerized. Juno is mirrored. Halcyon has no snapshot. Juno is not virtualized. Halcyon is not containerized. Orrery is not patched. Orrery is not idle. Halcyon is virtualized. Halcyon is idle. Halcyon is not mirrored. Juno has a snapshot. Juno is not containerized.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is not throttled provided that it is not mirrored as well as is idle. Section 2: a workload is provisioned provided that it is not throttled. Section 3: a workload is replicated provided that it is not virtualized. Section 4: a workload is not autoscaled provided that it is throttled as well as is not encrypted as well as is containerized. Section 5: a workload is not replicated provided that it is containerized. Section 6: a workload is autoscaled provided that it is not patched. Section 7: a workload is throttled provided that it is not mirrored as well as is not containerized as well as has no snapshot. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Halcyon is throttled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008867", "pair_id": "u008867-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008867-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7eb99964a667042c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008867-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is not patched. Orrery is containerized. Juno is mirrored. Halcyon has no snapshot. Juno is not virtualized. Halcyon is not containerized. Orrery is not patched. Orrery is not idle. Halcyon is virtualized. Halcyon is idle. Halcyon is not mirrored. Juno has a snapshot. Juno is not containerized.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is not mirrored plus is idle: then it is not throttled. Policy II. Suppose that workload is not throttled: then it is provisioned. Policy III. Suppose that workload is not virtualized: then it is replicated. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is throttled plus is not encrypted plus is containerized: then it is not autoscaled. Policy V. Suppose that workload is containerized: then it is not replicated. Policy VI. Suppose that workload is not patched: then it is autoscaled. Policy VII. Suppose that workload is not mirrored plus is not containerized plus has a snapshot: then it is throttled. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Halcyon is throttled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008867", "pair_id": "u008867-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008867-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "71fcac7c48fbfd52", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008867-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is not patched. Orrery is containerized. Juno is mirrored. Halcyon has no snapshot. Juno is not virtualized. Halcyon is not containerized. Orrery is not patched. Orrery is not idle. Halcyon is virtualized. Halcyon is idle. Halcyon is not mirrored. Juno has a snapshot. Juno is not containerized.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is not mirrored plus is idle: then it is not throttled. Policy II. Suppose that workload is not throttled: then it is provisioned. Policy III. Suppose that workload is not virtualized: then it is replicated. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is throttled plus is not encrypted plus is containerized: then it is not autoscaled. Policy V. Suppose that workload is containerized: then it is not replicated. Policy VI. Suppose that workload is not patched: then it is autoscaled. Policy VII. Suppose that workload is not mirrored plus is not containerized plus has no snapshot: then it is throttled. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Halcyon is throttled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008867", "pair_id": "u008867-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008867-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7eb99964a667042c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008867-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is not patched. Orrery is containerized. Juno is mirrored. Halcyon has no snapshot. Juno is not virtualized. Halcyon is not containerized. Orrery is not patched. Orrery is not idle. Halcyon is virtualized. Halcyon is idle. Halcyon is not mirrored. Juno has a snapshot. Juno is not containerized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is not mirrored and additionally is idle, it then is not throttled. #2 Each time a workload is not throttled, it then is provisioned. #3 Each time a workload is not virtualized, it then is replicated. #4 Each time a workload is throttled and additionally is not encrypted and additionally is containerized, it then is not autoscaled. #5 Each time a workload is containerized, it then is not replicated. #6 Each time a workload is not patched, it then is autoscaled. #7 Each time a workload is not mirrored and additionally is not containerized and additionally has a snapshot, it then is throttled. #6 yields to #4. #1 yields to #7. #3 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Halcyon is throttled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008867", "pair_id": "u008867-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008867-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "71fcac7c48fbfd52", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008867-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is not patched. Orrery is containerized. Juno is mirrored. Halcyon has no snapshot. Juno is not virtualized. Halcyon is not containerized. Orrery is not patched. Orrery is not idle. Halcyon is virtualized. Halcyon is idle. Halcyon is not mirrored. Juno has a snapshot. Juno is not containerized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is not mirrored and additionally is idle, it then is not throttled. #2 Each time a workload is not throttled, it then is provisioned. #3 Each time a workload is not virtualized, it then is replicated. #4 Each time a workload is throttled and additionally is not encrypted and additionally is containerized, it then is not autoscaled. #5 Each time a workload is containerized, it then is not replicated. #6 Each time a workload is not patched, it then is autoscaled. #7 Each time a workload is not mirrored and additionally is not containerized and additionally has no snapshot, it then is throttled. #6 yields to #4. #1 yields to #7. #3 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Halcyon is throttled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008867", "pair_id": "u008867-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008867-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7eb99964a667042c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008886-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dagny is not audited. Dagny has no escrow account. Dagny has a guarantor. Dagny is not pensioned. Dagny is creditworthy. Ingrid is garnished. Dagny is not garnished. Ingrid is indebted. Dagny is a homeowner. Greta has no escrow account. Ingrid has no cosigner. Dagny is not indebted. Anouk is garnished. Greta is not garnished. Greta is creditworthy. Greta is a homeowner. Anouk is creditworthy. Anouk is audited. Ingrid has no guarantor. Anouk is not pensioned. Dagny is underwritten. Greta is indebted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has no guarantor, thus it has no collateral. Provision 2: when the borrower here is not prequalified while is a homeowner, thus it is not refinanced. Provision 3: when the borrower here is not refinanced while is audited while is underwritten, thus it is amortized. Provision 4: when the borrower here has a guarantor, thus it is delinquent. Provision 5: when the borrower here is pensioned while has an escrow account, thus it is not vetted. Provision 6: when the borrower here is audited while has a cosigner, thus it has collateral. Provision 7: when the borrower here has a guarantor, thus it is not prequalified. Provision 8: when the borrower here is not indebted, thus it has a mortgage. Provision 9: when the borrower here is audited, thus it is vetted. Provision 10: when the borrower here is garnished, thus it is prequalified. Provision 11: when the borrower here is not refinanced while is not audited while is delinquent, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 5 has no effect when the borrower here is creditworthy. Provision 6 has no effect when the borrower here is indebted. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Which one describes Dagny?", "options": ["is amortized", "is foreclosed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is foreclosed", "unit_id": "u008886", "pair_id": "u008886-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008886-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "602cc29241de6958", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008886-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dagny is audited. Dagny has no escrow account. Dagny has a guarantor. Dagny is not pensioned. Dagny is creditworthy. Ingrid is garnished. Dagny is not garnished. Ingrid is indebted. Dagny is a homeowner. Greta has no escrow account. Ingrid has no cosigner. Dagny is not indebted. Anouk is garnished. Greta is not garnished. Greta is creditworthy. Greta is a homeowner. Anouk is creditworthy. Anouk is audited. Ingrid has no guarantor. Anouk is not pensioned. Dagny is underwritten. Greta is indebted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has no guarantor, thus it has no collateral. Provision 2: when the borrower here is not prequalified while is a homeowner, thus it is not refinanced. Provision 3: when the borrower here is not refinanced while is audited while is underwritten, thus it is amortized. Provision 4: when the borrower here has a guarantor, thus it is delinquent. Provision 5: when the borrower here is pensioned while has an escrow account, thus it is not vetted. Provision 6: when the borrower here is audited while has a cosigner, thus it has collateral. Provision 7: when the borrower here has a guarantor, thus it is not prequalified. Provision 8: when the borrower here is not indebted, thus it has a mortgage. Provision 9: when the borrower here is audited, thus it is vetted. Provision 10: when the borrower here is garnished, thus it is prequalified. Provision 11: when the borrower here is not refinanced while is not audited while is delinquent, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 5 has no effect when the borrower here is creditworthy. Provision 6 has no effect when the borrower here is indebted. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Which one describes Dagny?", "options": ["is amortized", "is foreclosed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is amortized", "unit_id": "u008886", "pair_id": "u008886-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008886-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "eff3369a4d36bbec", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008886-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dagny is not audited. Dagny has no escrow account. Dagny has a guarantor. Dagny is not pensioned. Dagny is creditworthy. Ingrid is garnished. Dagny is not garnished. Ingrid is indebted. Dagny is a homeowner. Greta has no escrow account. Ingrid has no cosigner. Dagny is not indebted. Anouk is garnished. Greta is not garnished. Greta is creditworthy. Greta is a homeowner. Anouk is creditworthy. Anouk is audited. Ingrid has no guarantor. Anouk is not pensioned. Dagny is underwritten. Greta is indebted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has no guarantor, so it has no collateral. No. 2 While the given borrower is not prequalified and likewise is a homeowner, so it is not refinanced. No. 3 While the given borrower is not refinanced and likewise is audited and likewise is underwritten, so it is amortized. No. 4 While the given borrower has a guarantor, so it is delinquent. No. 5 While the given borrower is pensioned and likewise has an escrow account, so it is not vetted. No. 6 While the given borrower is audited and likewise has a cosigner, so it has collateral. No. 7 While the given borrower has a guarantor, so it is not prequalified. No. 8 While the given borrower is not indebted, so it has a mortgage. No. 9 While the given borrower is audited, so it is vetted. No. 10 While the given borrower is garnished, so it is prequalified. No. 11 While the given borrower is not refinanced and likewise is not audited and likewise is delinquent, so it is foreclosed. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given borrower is creditworthy. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given borrower is indebted. No. 9 wins over No. 5. No. 10 wins over No. 7. No. 6 wins over No. 1. Question: Select what holds for Dagny: which option?", "options": ["is amortized", "is foreclosed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is foreclosed", "unit_id": "u008886", "pair_id": "u008886-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008886-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "602cc29241de6958", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008886-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dagny is audited. Dagny has no escrow account. Dagny has a guarantor. Dagny is not pensioned. Dagny is creditworthy. Ingrid is garnished. Dagny is not garnished. Ingrid is indebted. Dagny is a homeowner. Greta has no escrow account. Ingrid has no cosigner. Dagny is not indebted. Anouk is garnished. Greta is not garnished. Greta is creditworthy. Greta is a homeowner. Anouk is creditworthy. Anouk is audited. Ingrid has no guarantor. Anouk is not pensioned. Dagny is underwritten. Greta is indebted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has no guarantor, so it has no collateral. No. 2 While the given borrower is not prequalified and likewise is a homeowner, so it is not refinanced. No. 3 While the given borrower is not refinanced and likewise is audited and likewise is underwritten, so it is amortized. No. 4 While the given borrower has a guarantor, so it is delinquent. No. 5 While the given borrower is pensioned and likewise has an escrow account, so it is not vetted. No. 6 While the given borrower is audited and likewise has a cosigner, so it has collateral. No. 7 While the given borrower has a guarantor, so it is not prequalified. No. 8 While the given borrower is not indebted, so it has a mortgage. No. 9 While the given borrower is audited, so it is vetted. No. 10 While the given borrower is garnished, so it is prequalified. No. 11 While the given borrower is not refinanced and likewise is not audited and likewise is delinquent, so it is foreclosed. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given borrower is creditworthy. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given borrower is indebted. No. 9 wins over No. 5. No. 10 wins over No. 7. No. 6 wins over No. 1. Question: Select what holds for Dagny: which option?", "options": ["is amortized", "is foreclosed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is amortized", "unit_id": "u008886", "pair_id": "u008886-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008886-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "eff3369a4d36bbec", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u008922-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is garnished. Bastien has a debt ratio of 55. Bastien is overdrawn.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has a debt ratio in excess of 70, it thereby is amortized. Point B. If said borrower is overdrawn, it thereby is solvent. Point C. If said borrower is foreclosed, it thereby has an escrow account. Point D. If said borrower has no cosigner, it thereby has no escrow account. Point E. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby has no cosigner. Point F. If said borrower is overdrawn, it thereby is creditworthy. Point G. If said borrower is solvent, it thereby is foreclosed. Point H. If said borrower is garnished, it thereby is bankrupt. Question: Statement: Bastien has no escrow account. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008922", "pair_id": "u008922-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008922-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "ab08aa1a35fc4919", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u008922-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is garnished. Bastien has a debt ratio of 55. Bastien is overdrawn.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has a debt ratio in excess of 70, it thereby is amortized. Point B. If said borrower is not overdrawn, it thereby is solvent. Point C. If said borrower is foreclosed, it thereby has an escrow account. Point D. If said borrower has no cosigner, it thereby has no escrow account. Point E. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby has no cosigner. Point F. If said borrower is overdrawn, it thereby is creditworthy. Point G. If said borrower is solvent, it thereby is foreclosed. Point H. If said borrower is garnished, it thereby is bankrupt. Question: Statement: Bastien has no escrow account. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008922", "pair_id": "u008922-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008922-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d8265db00246ed2c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u008940-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Deneb has a milestone total of 73. Gemma is resubmitted. Gemma has a citation index of 95. Gemma has a milestone total of 15. Gemma has a review mark of 3. Deneb is not resubmitted. Gemma is shortlisted. Deneb has a review mark of 10. Deneb has a citation index of 78. Deneb is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is not preregistered: then it is a pilot study. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it is endorsed. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is renewed. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has a review mark higher than 85: then it has no seed funding. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has a review mark no higher than 26: then it is not preregistered. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is shortlisted: then it has no patent filing. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal has a review mark higher than 26: then it has seed funding. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal is renewed: then it is translational. Policy IX. Suppose that proposal has a milestone total no higher than 40: then it is not renewed. Policy VI is waived if that proposal has a milestone total smaller than 74. Policy VIII is waived if that proposal is resubmitted. Policy II is waived if that proposal has a citation index no higher than 57. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy IV. Question: Which choice is right for Deneb?", "options": ["is endorsed", "is translational"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u008940", "pair_id": "u008940-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008940-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3fbd1c5e044c8bf9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a7"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008940-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Deneb has a milestone total of 32. Gemma is resubmitted. Gemma has a citation index of 95. Gemma has a milestone total of 15. Gemma has a review mark of 3. Deneb is not resubmitted. Gemma is shortlisted. Deneb has a review mark of 10. Deneb has a citation index of 78. Deneb is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is not preregistered: then it is a pilot study. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it is endorsed. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is renewed. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has a review mark higher than 85: then it has no seed funding. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has a review mark no higher than 26: then it is not preregistered. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is shortlisted: then it has no patent filing. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal has a review mark higher than 26: then it has seed funding. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal is renewed: then it is translational. Policy IX. Suppose that proposal has a milestone total no higher than 40: then it is not renewed. Policy VI is waived if that proposal has a milestone total smaller than 74. Policy VIII is waived if that proposal is resubmitted. Policy II is waived if that proposal has a citation index no higher than 57. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy IV. Question: Which choice is right for Deneb?", "options": ["is endorsed", "is translational"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u008940", "pair_id": "u008940-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008940-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e0634eaa459102ea", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a7"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008940-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Deneb has a milestone total of 73. Gemma is resubmitted. Gemma has a citation index of 95. Gemma has a milestone total of 15. Gemma has a review mark of 3. Deneb is not resubmitted. Gemma is shortlisted. Deneb has a review mark of 10. Deneb has a citation index of 78. Deneb is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is not preregistered, it then is a pilot study. #2 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then is endorsed. #3 Each time a proposal has seed funding, it then is renewed. #4 Each time a proposal has a review mark greater than 85, it then has no seed funding. #5 Each time a proposal has a review mark of 26 or below, it then is not preregistered. #6 Each time a proposal is shortlisted, it then has no patent filing. #7 Each time a proposal has a review mark greater than 26, it then has seed funding. #8 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is translational. #9 Each time a proposal has a milestone total of 40 or below, it then is not renewed. #6 is set aside if a proposal has a milestone total less than 74. #8 is set aside if a proposal is resubmitted. #2 is set aside if a proposal has a citation index of 57 or below. #9 yields to #3. #4 yields to #7. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Deneb?", "options": ["is endorsed", "is translational"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u008940", "pair_id": "u008940-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008940-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3fbd1c5e044c8bf9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a7"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008940-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Deneb has a milestone total of 32. Gemma is resubmitted. Gemma has a citation index of 95. Gemma has a milestone total of 15. Gemma has a review mark of 3. Deneb is not resubmitted. Gemma is shortlisted. Deneb has a review mark of 10. Deneb has a citation index of 78. Deneb is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is not preregistered, it then is a pilot study. #2 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then is endorsed. #3 Each time a proposal has seed funding, it then is renewed. #4 Each time a proposal has a review mark greater than 85, it then has no seed funding. #5 Each time a proposal has a review mark of 26 or below, it then is not preregistered. #6 Each time a proposal is shortlisted, it then has no patent filing. #7 Each time a proposal has a review mark greater than 26, it then has seed funding. #8 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is translational. #9 Each time a proposal has a milestone total of 40 or below, it then is not renewed. #6 is set aside if a proposal has a milestone total less than 74. #8 is set aside if a proposal is resubmitted. #2 is set aside if a proposal has a citation index of 57 or below. #9 yields to #3. #4 yields to #7. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Deneb?", "options": ["is endorsed", "is translational"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u008940", "pair_id": "u008940-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008940-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e0634eaa459102ea", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a7"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u008945-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a parcel volume of 28. Saskia is not labeled. Quentin is sealed. Priya is not weighed. Saskia has a parcel volume of 61. Priya has a parcel volume of 44. Ulla is weighed. Quentin has a parcel volume of 20.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is labeled, it thereby is not registered. Point B. If said parcel is fragile, it thereby is hazardous. Point C. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby has no waybill. Point D. If said parcel is sealed, it thereby has a waybill. Point E. If said parcel has a parcel volume of minimum 71, it thereby is fragile. Point F. If said parcel is sealed, it thereby is not fragile. Point G. If said parcel has a waybill, it thereby is not hazardous. Point B supersedes Point G. Point C supersedes Point D. Point E supersedes Point F. Question: Statement: Priya is hazardous. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008945", "pair_id": "u008945-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008945-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6c73646c65052718", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u008945-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a parcel volume of 28. Saskia is not labeled. Quentin is sealed. Priya is not weighed. Saskia has a parcel volume of 61. Priya has a parcel volume of 44. Ulla is weighed. Quentin has a parcel volume of 20.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is labeled, it thereby is not registered. Point B. If said parcel is fragile, it thereby is hazardous. Point C. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby has no waybill. Point D. If said parcel is sealed, it thereby has a waybill. Point E. If said parcel has a parcel volume of minimum 28, it thereby is fragile. Point F. If said parcel is sealed, it thereby is not fragile. Point G. If said parcel has a waybill, it thereby is not hazardous. Point B supersedes Point G. Point C supersedes Point D. Point E supersedes Point F. Question: Statement: Priya is hazardous. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u008945", "pair_id": "u008945-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008945-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0c088cf716d1d2fb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u008956-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is not unionized. Lotte is not unionized. Noor has an aptitude quotient of 41. Lotte has a notice period of 32. Noor has a commute radius of 51. Noor has a seniority step of 27. Lotte has a commute radius of 5. Noor has a notice period of 88. Noor is not unionized. Kalle has a seniority step of 63. Noor is a graduate. Hedda has a notice period of 94. Kalle has a commute radius of 1. Noor is sponsored. Kalle has a notice period of 82. Kalle is not a graduate. Lotte is a graduate.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has an aptitude quotient no higher than 29 plus has a commute radius smaller than 18 plus has a notice period no lower than 81: then it has a diploma. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a diploma plus has a seniority step no lower than 26: then it is not recommended. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is sponsored plus is unionized: then it is licensed. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has a diploma plus has a commute radius no lower than 76 plus is sponsored: then it is freelance. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has an aptitude quotient higher than 29 plus has a commute radius no lower than 18: then it has no diploma. Policy II is waived if that candidate is sponsored. Policy I is waived if that candidate has an aptitude quotient smaller than 34 plus is a graduate. Policy IV is waived if that candidate has an aptitude quotient smaller than 53. Question: Is it so that Noor has a diploma?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008956", "pair_id": "u008956-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008956-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "92852d42580c7828", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008956-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is not unionized. Lotte is not unionized. Noor has an aptitude quotient of 41. Lotte has a notice period of 32. Noor has a commute radius of 51. Noor has a seniority step of 27. Lotte has a commute radius of 5. Noor has a notice period of 88. Noor is not unionized. Kalle has a seniority step of 63. Noor is a graduate. Hedda has a notice period of 94. Kalle has a commute radius of 1. Noor is sponsored. Kalle has a notice period of 82. Kalle is not a graduate. Lotte is a graduate.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has an aptitude quotient no higher than 29 plus has a commute radius smaller than 18 plus has a notice period no lower than 81: then it has a diploma. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a diploma plus has a seniority step no lower than 26: then it is not recommended. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is sponsored plus is unionized: then it is licensed. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has a diploma plus has a commute radius no lower than 76 plus is sponsored: then it is freelance. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has an aptitude quotient no higher than 29 plus has a commute radius no lower than 18: then it has no diploma. Policy II is waived if that candidate is sponsored. Policy I is waived if that candidate has an aptitude quotient smaller than 34 plus is a graduate. Policy IV is waived if that candidate has an aptitude quotient smaller than 53. Question: Is it so that Noor has a diploma?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008956", "pair_id": "u008956-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008956-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "629305bca3095cc9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008956-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is not unionized. Lotte is not unionized. Noor has an aptitude quotient of 41. Lotte has a notice period of 32. Noor has a commute radius of 51. Noor has a seniority step of 27. Lotte has a commute radius of 5. Noor has a notice period of 88. Noor is not unionized. Kalle has a seniority step of 63. Noor is a graduate. Hedda has a notice period of 94. Kalle has a commute radius of 1. Noor is sponsored. Kalle has a notice period of 82. Kalle is not a graduate. Lotte is a graduate.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient of 29 or below and additionally has a commute radius less than 18 and additionally has a notice period of 81 or above, it then has a diploma. #2 Each time a candidate has a diploma and additionally has a seniority step of 26 or above, it then is not recommended. #3 Each time a candidate is sponsored and additionally is unionized, it then is licensed. #4 Each time a candidate has a diploma and additionally has a commute radius of 76 or above and additionally is sponsored, it then is freelance. #5 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient greater than 29 and additionally has a commute radius of 18 or above, it then has no diploma. #2 is set aside if a candidate is sponsored. #1 is set aside if a candidate has an aptitude quotient less than 34 and additionally is a graduate. #4 is set aside if a candidate has an aptitude quotient less than 53. Question: Do the terms above show that Noor has a diploma?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u008956", "pair_id": "u008956-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008956-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "92852d42580c7828", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u008956-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is not unionized. Lotte is not unionized. Noor has an aptitude quotient of 41. Lotte has a notice period of 32. Noor has a commute radius of 51. Noor has a seniority step of 27. Lotte has a commute radius of 5. Noor has a notice period of 88. Noor is not unionized. Kalle has a seniority step of 63. Noor is a graduate. Hedda has a notice period of 94. Kalle has a commute radius of 1. Noor is sponsored. Kalle has a notice period of 82. Kalle is not a graduate. Lotte is a graduate.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient of 29 or below and additionally has a commute radius less than 18 and additionally has a notice period of 81 or above, it then has a diploma. #2 Each time a candidate has a diploma and additionally has a seniority step of 26 or above, it then is not recommended. #3 Each time a candidate is sponsored and additionally is unionized, it then is licensed. #4 Each time a candidate has a diploma and additionally has a commute radius of 76 or above and additionally is sponsored, it then is freelance. #5 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient of 29 or below and additionally has a commute radius of 18 or above, it then has no diploma. #2 is set aside if a candidate is sponsored. #1 is set aside if a candidate has an aptitude quotient less than 34 and additionally is a graduate. #4 is set aside if a candidate has an aptitude quotient less than 53. Question: Do the terms above show that Noor has a diploma?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u008956", "pair_id": "u008956-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u008956-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "629305bca3095cc9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u009030-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek is diabetic. Benedek has no interpreter. Benedek is ambulatory. Benedek is allergic. Benedek is pregnant. Benedek is not anemic. Benedek has a pacemaker. Benedek is admitted. Benedek is rescheduled. Benedek is not discharged. Benedek is sedated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has a chaperone provided that it is discharged. Section 2: a patient is fasting provided that it is allergic as well as is discharged. Section 3: a patient is not hypertensive provided that it has a pacemaker. Section 4: a patient is asthmatic provided that it is allergic as well as has a pacemaker as well as has a caregiver. Section 5: a patient is symptomatic provided that it is allergic as well as is ambulatory as well as has a caregiver. Section 6: a patient is waitlisted provided that it is allergic as well as is pregnant as well as is rescheduled. Section 7: a patient is not symptomatic provided that it is bedridden. Section 8: a patient is not waitlisted provided that it is discharged. Section 9: a patient is contagious provided that it has an interpreter. Section 10: a patient is not contagious provided that it is anemic as well as is sedated. Section 11: a patient is hypertensive provided that it is allergic. Section 12: a patient is triaged provided that it is allergic as well as is bedridden as well as is diabetic. Section 13: a patient has no chaperone provided that it is admitted. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 13. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 11. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 6. Question: Which statement fits Benedek?", "options": ["is fasting", "is asthmatic", "is triaged", "is waitlisted", "is symptomatic"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is waitlisted", "unit_id": "u009030", "pair_id": "u009030-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009030-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a97bcf2a5ac0ff0d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a6", "a0", "a1", "a12"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u009030-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek is diabetic. Benedek has no interpreter. Benedek is ambulatory. Benedek is allergic. Benedek is pregnant. Benedek is not anemic. Benedek has no pacemaker. Benedek is admitted. Benedek is rescheduled. Benedek is not discharged. Benedek is sedated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has a chaperone provided that it is discharged. Section 2: a patient is fasting provided that it is allergic as well as is discharged. Section 3: a patient is not hypertensive provided that it has a pacemaker. Section 4: a patient is asthmatic provided that it is allergic as well as has a pacemaker as well as has a caregiver. Section 5: a patient is symptomatic provided that it is allergic as well as is ambulatory as well as has a caregiver. Section 6: a patient is waitlisted provided that it is allergic as well as is pregnant as well as is rescheduled. Section 7: a patient is not symptomatic provided that it is bedridden. Section 8: a patient is not waitlisted provided that it is discharged. Section 9: a patient is contagious provided that it has an interpreter. Section 10: a patient is not contagious provided that it is anemic as well as is sedated. Section 11: a patient is hypertensive provided that it is allergic. Section 12: a patient is triaged provided that it is allergic as well as is bedridden as well as is diabetic. Section 13: a patient has no chaperone provided that it is admitted. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 13. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 11. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 6. Question: Which statement fits Benedek?", "options": ["is fasting", "is asthmatic", "is triaged", "is waitlisted", "is symptomatic"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is waitlisted", "unit_id": "u009030", "pair_id": "u009030-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009030-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ee6a686c9359c3a7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a6", "a0", "a1", "a12"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u009030-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek is diabetic. Benedek has no interpreter. Benedek is ambulatory. Benedek is allergic. Benedek is pregnant. Benedek is not anemic. Benedek has a pacemaker. Benedek is admitted. Benedek is rescheduled. Benedek is not discharged. Benedek is sedated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is discharged, it then has a chaperone. #2 Each time a patient is allergic and additionally is discharged, it then is fasting. #3 Each time a patient has a pacemaker, it then is not hypertensive. #4 Each time a patient is allergic and additionally has a pacemaker and additionally has a caregiver, it then is asthmatic. #5 Each time a patient is allergic and additionally is ambulatory and additionally has a caregiver, it then is symptomatic. #6 Each time a patient is allergic and additionally is pregnant and additionally is rescheduled, it then is waitlisted. #7 Each time a patient is bedridden, it then is not symptomatic. #8 Each time a patient is discharged, it then is not waitlisted. #9 Each time a patient has an interpreter, it then is contagious. #10 Each time a patient is anemic and additionally is sedated, it then is not contagious. #11 Each time a patient is allergic, it then is hypertensive. #12 Each time a patient is allergic and additionally is bedridden and additionally is diabetic, it then is triaged. #13 Each time a patient is admitted, it then has no chaperone. #13 yields to #1. #5 yields to #7. #9 yields to #10. #11 yields to #3. #6 yields to #8. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Benedek?", "options": ["is fasting", "is asthmatic", "is triaged", "is waitlisted", "is symptomatic"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is waitlisted", "unit_id": "u009030", "pair_id": "u009030-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009030-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a97bcf2a5ac0ff0d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a6", "a0", "a1", "a12"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u009030-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek is diabetic. Benedek has no interpreter. Benedek is ambulatory. Benedek is allergic. Benedek is pregnant. Benedek is not anemic. Benedek has no pacemaker. Benedek is admitted. Benedek is rescheduled. Benedek is not discharged. Benedek is sedated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is discharged, it then has a chaperone. #2 Each time a patient is allergic and additionally is discharged, it then is fasting. #3 Each time a patient has a pacemaker, it then is not hypertensive. #4 Each time a patient is allergic and additionally has a pacemaker and additionally has a caregiver, it then is asthmatic. #5 Each time a patient is allergic and additionally is ambulatory and additionally has a caregiver, it then is symptomatic. #6 Each time a patient is allergic and additionally is pregnant and additionally is rescheduled, it then is waitlisted. #7 Each time a patient is bedridden, it then is not symptomatic. #8 Each time a patient is discharged, it then is not waitlisted. #9 Each time a patient has an interpreter, it then is contagious. #10 Each time a patient is anemic and additionally is sedated, it then is not contagious. #11 Each time a patient is allergic, it then is hypertensive. #12 Each time a patient is allergic and additionally is bedridden and additionally is diabetic, it then is triaged. #13 Each time a patient is admitted, it then has no chaperone. #13 yields to #1. #5 yields to #7. #9 yields to #10. #11 yields to #3. #6 yields to #8. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Benedek?", "options": ["is fasting", "is asthmatic", "is triaged", "is waitlisted", "is symptomatic"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is waitlisted", "unit_id": "u009030", "pair_id": "u009030-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009030-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ee6a686c9359c3a7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a6", "a0", "a1", "a12"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u009105-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is sharded. Sierra is replicated. Sierra is containerized. Sierra is deprecated. Sierra is not stateless.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is sharded plus is replicated: then it has a GPU. Policy II. Suppose that workload is containerized plus is stateless: then it has no firewall. Question: Is it so that Sierra has a firewall?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009105", "pair_id": "u009105-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009105-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "9d47d156ddf68917", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u009105-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is sharded. Sierra is replicated. Sierra is containerized. Sierra is deprecated. Sierra is not stateless.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is sharded plus is replicated: then it has a GPU. Policy II. Suppose that workload is containerized plus is replicated plus is deprecated: then it has a firewall. Policy III. Suppose that workload is containerized plus is stateless: then it has no firewall. Question: Is it so that Sierra has a firewall?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u009105", "pair_id": "u009105-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009105-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "2c66200808b64b9f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u009159-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh is delayed. Kaveh is not damaged. Kaveh is undeliverable. Kaveh is not stamped. Kaveh is labeled. Kaveh is prepaid. Kaveh is rerouted. Kaveh has no courier. Kaveh is fragile. Kaveh is not perishable. Kaveh is refrigerated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is misrouted plus is stamped plus is rerouted: then it is hazardous. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is perishable: then it is not palletized. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is not delayed: then it is not tracked. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has a courier plus is fragile: then it has a waybill. Policy V. Suppose that parcel has no courier: then it is not scanned. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is misrouted plus is refrigerated plus is not weighed: then it is palletized. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is damaged plus is not undeliverable: then it has a barcode. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is misrouted plus is perishable plus has a courier: then it is consolidated. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is fragile plus is prepaid: then it is misrouted. Policy X. Suppose that parcel is misrouted plus is rerouted plus is labeled: then it is tracked. Policy XI. Suppose that parcel is misrouted plus is not delayed plus has a courier: then it is sealed. Policy IV is waived if that parcel is not labeled. Policy X is waived if that parcel is weighed. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy X. Question: Which choice is right for Kaveh?", "options": ["is consolidated", "is hazardous", "is sealed", "is palletized", "is tracked"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u009159", "pair_id": "u009159-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009159-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4e07eca4a97d6243", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a12", "a19", "a9", "a4"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u009159-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh is delayed. Kaveh is not damaged. Kaveh is undeliverable. Kaveh is not stamped. Kaveh is labeled. Kaveh is prepaid. Kaveh is rerouted. Kaveh has a courier. Kaveh is fragile. Kaveh is not perishable. Kaveh is refrigerated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is misrouted plus is stamped plus is rerouted: then it is hazardous. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is perishable: then it is not palletized. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is not delayed: then it is not tracked. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has a courier plus is fragile: then it has a waybill. Policy V. Suppose that parcel has no courier: then it is not scanned. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is misrouted plus is refrigerated plus is not weighed: then it is palletized. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is damaged plus is not undeliverable: then it has a barcode. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is misrouted plus is perishable plus has a courier: then it is consolidated. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is fragile plus is prepaid: then it is misrouted. Policy X. Suppose that parcel is misrouted plus is rerouted plus is labeled: then it is tracked. Policy XI. Suppose that parcel is misrouted plus is not delayed plus has a courier: then it is sealed. Policy IV is waived if that parcel is not labeled. Policy X is waived if that parcel is weighed. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy X. Question: Which choice is right for Kaveh?", "options": ["is consolidated", "is hazardous", "is sealed", "is palletized", "is tracked"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u009159", "pair_id": "u009159-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009159-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6d4ba15b98b7de0f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a12", "a19", "a9", "a4"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u009198-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ilse is not audited. Ingrid is prequalified. Evren is amortized. Corin is amortized. Evren is employed. Evren is not refinanced. Evren is not overdrawn. Evren is not delinquent. Corin is not audited. Evren is prequalified. Ingrid is not refinanced.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is bankrupt provided that it is delinquent. Section 2: a borrower has a lien provided that it is a homeowner as well as is refinanced. Section 3: a borrower is not a depositor provided that it is overdrawn. Section 4: a borrower is a depositor provided that it is a homeowner as well as is audited. Section 5: a borrower has no lien provided that it has a cosigner. Section 6: a borrower is vetted provided that it is a homeowner as well as is solvent. Section 7: a borrower is garnished provided that it is a homeowner as well as is overdrawn. Section 8: a borrower is not foreclosed provided that it is refinanced. Section 9: a borrower is foreclosed provided that it is a homeowner as well as is prequalified as well as is amortized. Section 10: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it is employed. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Which statement fits Evren?", "options": ["is garnished", "is vetted", "is a depositor", "has a lien", "is foreclosed"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is foreclosed", "unit_id": "u009198", "pair_id": "u009198-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009198-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d2729cec48a16b49", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a12", "a2", "a15", "a4", "a3"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u009198-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ilse is not audited. Ingrid is prequalified. Evren is amortized. Corin is amortized. Evren is employed. Evren is not refinanced. Evren is not overdrawn. Evren is delinquent. Corin is not audited. Evren is prequalified. Ingrid is not refinanced.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is bankrupt provided that it is delinquent. Section 2: a borrower has a lien provided that it is a homeowner as well as is refinanced. Section 3: a borrower is not a depositor provided that it is overdrawn. Section 4: a borrower is a depositor provided that it is a homeowner as well as is audited. Section 5: a borrower has no lien provided that it has a cosigner. Section 6: a borrower is vetted provided that it is a homeowner as well as is solvent. Section 7: a borrower is garnished provided that it is a homeowner as well as is overdrawn. Section 8: a borrower is not foreclosed provided that it is refinanced. Section 9: a borrower is foreclosed provided that it is a homeowner as well as is prequalified as well as is amortized. Section 10: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it is employed. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Which statement fits Evren?", "options": ["is garnished", "is vetted", "is a depositor", "has a lien", "is foreclosed"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is foreclosed", "unit_id": "u009198", "pair_id": "u009198-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009198-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1fe7034d684ec828", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a12", "a2", "a15", "a4", "a3"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u009198-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ilse is not audited. Ingrid is prequalified. Evren is amortized. Corin is amortized. Evren is employed. Evren is not refinanced. Evren is not overdrawn. Evren is not delinquent. Corin is not audited. Evren is prequalified. Ingrid is not refinanced.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is delinquent, it then is bankrupt. #2 Each time a borrower is a homeowner and additionally is refinanced, it then has a lien. #3 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is not a depositor. #4 Each time a borrower is a homeowner and additionally is audited, it then is a depositor. #5 Each time a borrower has a cosigner, it then has no lien. #6 Each time a borrower is a homeowner and additionally is solvent, it then is vetted. #7 Each time a borrower is a homeowner and additionally is overdrawn, it then is garnished. #8 Each time a borrower is refinanced, it then is not foreclosed. #9 Each time a borrower is a homeowner and additionally is prequalified and additionally is amortized, it then is foreclosed. #10 Each time a borrower is employed, it then is a homeowner. #4 yields to #3. #9 yields to #8. #2 yields to #5. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Evren?", "options": ["is garnished", "is vetted", "is a depositor", "has a lien", "is foreclosed"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is foreclosed", "unit_id": "u009198", "pair_id": "u009198-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009198-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d2729cec48a16b49", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a12", "a2", "a15", "a4", "a3"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u009198-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ilse is not audited. Ingrid is prequalified. Evren is amortized. Corin is amortized. Evren is employed. Evren is not refinanced. Evren is not overdrawn. Evren is delinquent. Corin is not audited. Evren is prequalified. Ingrid is not refinanced.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is delinquent, it then is bankrupt. #2 Each time a borrower is a homeowner and additionally is refinanced, it then has a lien. #3 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is not a depositor. #4 Each time a borrower is a homeowner and additionally is audited, it then is a depositor. #5 Each time a borrower has a cosigner, it then has no lien. #6 Each time a borrower is a homeowner and additionally is solvent, it then is vetted. #7 Each time a borrower is a homeowner and additionally is overdrawn, it then is garnished. #8 Each time a borrower is refinanced, it then is not foreclosed. #9 Each time a borrower is a homeowner and additionally is prequalified and additionally is amortized, it then is foreclosed. #10 Each time a borrower is employed, it then is a homeowner. #4 yields to #3. #9 yields to #8. #2 yields to #5. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Evren?", "options": ["is garnished", "is vetted", "is a depositor", "has a lien", "is foreclosed"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is foreclosed", "unit_id": "u009198", "pair_id": "u009198-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009198-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1fe7034d684ec828", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a12", "a2", "a15", "a4", "a3"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u009222-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is seasoned. Petra has a commute radius of 14. Petra is seasoned. Kalle is not a veteran. Petra is not a veteran. Kalle is not probationary. Petra is probationary. Petra is relocating.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is not a veteran, it then has a portfolio. #2 Each time a candidate is seasoned, it then is certified. #3 Each time a candidate has no mentor, it then has a background screening. #4 Each time a candidate is relocating, it then has no mentor. #5 Each time a candidate has a background screening, it then is freelance. #6 Each time a candidate has a commute radius of 30 or below, it then is not certified. #7 Each time a candidate is a veteran, it then has a mentor. #8 Each time a candidate is probationary, it then has no background screening. #9 Each time a candidate has a background screening, it then is not freelance. #10 Each time a candidate has a commute radius of 11 or above, it then is a graduate. #7 is set aside if a candidate is not a veteran. #8 is set aside if a candidate is not recommended. #9 is set aside if a candidate is a veteran. #9 yields to #5. #4 yields to #7. #8 yields to #3. #6 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Petra is freelance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u009222", "pair_id": "u009222-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009222-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a3dd54cf34a4144f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009222-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is seasoned. Petra has a commute radius of 14. Petra is seasoned. Kalle is not a veteran. Petra is not a veteran. Kalle is not probationary. Petra is probationary. Petra is relocating.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is not a veteran, it then has a portfolio. #2 Each time a candidate is seasoned, it then is certified. #3 Each time a candidate has no mentor, it then has a background screening. #4 Each time a candidate is relocating, it then has no mentor. #5 Each time a candidate has a background screening, it then is freelance. #6 Each time a candidate has a commute radius of 30 or below, it then is not certified. #7 Each time a candidate is a veteran, it then has a mentor. #8 Each time a candidate is probationary, it then has no background screening. #9 Each time a candidate has a background screening, it then is not freelance. #10 Each time a candidate has a commute radius of 11 or above, it then is a graduate. #7 is set aside if a candidate is not a veteran. #8 is set aside if a candidate is not recommended. #9 is set aside if a candidate is a veteran. #5 is set aside if a candidate is not a veteran. #9 yields to #5. #4 yields to #7. #8 yields to #3. #6 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Petra is freelance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u009222", "pair_id": "u009222-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009222-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5a8912707bdb160f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009227-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile has a postal zone of 17. Kaveh has a delivery window of 86. Kaveh is scanned. Odile has a parcel volume of 17. Kaveh is registered. Odile has a delivery window of 40. Odile is not registered. Odile is scanned. Kaveh has a postal zone of 56. Kaveh is refrigerated. Odile is refrigerated. Quentin is not scanned. Quentin has a parcel volume of 99.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is hazardous and has a delivery window of at most 57 and has a postal zone below 68, then it is weighed. (2) If a parcel is delayed, then it is hazardous. (3) If a parcel has a parcel volume of at most 55, then it is delayed. (4) If a parcel has a delivery window above 44 and is not refrigerated, then it is damaged. (5) If a parcel is not registered and is scanned, then it is misrouted. (6) If a parcel is hazardous and has a delivery window above 57, then it has a barcode. (7) If a parcel has a postal zone below 16 and is not registered, then it is not perishable. (5) is void if the parcel has a postal zone of at most 43. Question: Which option holds for Odile?", "options": ["has a barcode", "is weighed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is weighed", "unit_id": "u009227", "pair_id": "u009227-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009227-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "58ec41c247b81eb0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a11", "a8"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u009227-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile has a postal zone of 7. Kaveh has a delivery window of 86. Kaveh is scanned. Odile has a parcel volume of 17. Kaveh is registered. Odile has a delivery window of 40. Odile is not registered. Odile is scanned. Kaveh has a postal zone of 56. Kaveh is refrigerated. Odile is refrigerated. Quentin is not scanned. Quentin has a parcel volume of 99.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is hazardous and has a delivery window of at most 57 and has a postal zone below 68, then it is weighed. (2) If a parcel is delayed, then it is hazardous. (3) If a parcel has a parcel volume of at most 55, then it is delayed. (4) If a parcel has a delivery window above 44 and is not refrigerated, then it is damaged. (5) If a parcel is not registered and is scanned, then it is misrouted. (6) If a parcel is hazardous and has a delivery window above 57, then it has a barcode. (7) If a parcel has a postal zone below 16 and is not registered, then it is not perishable. (5) is void if the parcel has a postal zone of at most 43. Question: Which option holds for Odile?", "options": ["has a barcode", "is weighed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is weighed", "unit_id": "u009227", "pair_id": "u009227-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009227-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ac8b9d47055f1627", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a11", "a8"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u009227-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile has a postal zone of 17. Kaveh has a delivery window of 86. Kaveh is scanned. Odile has a parcel volume of 17. Kaveh is registered. Odile has a delivery window of 40. Odile is not registered. Odile is scanned. Kaveh has a postal zone of 56. Kaveh is refrigerated. Odile is refrigerated. Quentin is not scanned. Quentin has a parcel volume of 99.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is hazardous, and has a delivery window of no more than 57, and has a postal zone of less than 68, that parcel is weighed. Item B. When the parcel is delayed, that parcel is hazardous. Item C. When the parcel has a parcel volume of no more than 55, that parcel is delayed. Item D. When the parcel has a delivery window of more than 44, and is not refrigerated, that parcel is damaged. Item E. When the parcel is not registered, and is scanned, that parcel is misrouted. Item F. When the parcel is hazardous, and has a delivery window of more than 57, that parcel has a barcode. Item G. When the parcel has a postal zone of less than 16, and is not registered, that parcel is not perishable. Item E is suspended when the parcel has a postal zone of no more than 43. Question: What applies to Odile?", "options": ["has a barcode", "is weighed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is weighed", "unit_id": "u009227", "pair_id": "u009227-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009227-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "58ec41c247b81eb0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a11", "a8"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u009227-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile has a postal zone of 7. Kaveh has a delivery window of 86. Kaveh is scanned. Odile has a parcel volume of 17. Kaveh is registered. Odile has a delivery window of 40. Odile is not registered. Odile is scanned. Kaveh has a postal zone of 56. Kaveh is refrigerated. Odile is refrigerated. Quentin is not scanned. Quentin has a parcel volume of 99.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is hazardous, and has a delivery window of no more than 57, and has a postal zone of less than 68, that parcel is weighed. Item B. When the parcel is delayed, that parcel is hazardous. Item C. When the parcel has a parcel volume of no more than 55, that parcel is delayed. Item D. When the parcel has a delivery window of more than 44, and is not refrigerated, that parcel is damaged. Item E. When the parcel is not registered, and is scanned, that parcel is misrouted. Item F. When the parcel is hazardous, and has a delivery window of more than 57, that parcel has a barcode. Item G. When the parcel has a postal zone of less than 16, and is not registered, that parcel is not perishable. Item E is suspended when the parcel has a postal zone of no more than 43. Question: What applies to Odile?", "options": ["has a barcode", "is weighed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is weighed", "unit_id": "u009227", "pair_id": "u009227-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009227-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ac8b9d47055f1627", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a11", "a8"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u009345-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is not stamped. Quentin has a barcode. Priya has no barcode. Quentin is not stamped.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is not undeliverable, that parcel is not fragile. Item B. When the parcel is refrigerated, that parcel is not rerouted. Item C. When the parcel is consolidated, that parcel is refrigerated. Item D. When the parcel has a barcode, that parcel is damaged. Item E. When the parcel is refrigerated, that parcel is rerouted. Item F. When the parcel is consolidated, that parcel is not scanned. Item A is suspended when the parcel is not consolidated. Item C is suspended when the parcel is undeliverable. Item B is suspended when the parcel is stamped. Item D is suspended when the parcel is not stamped. Item E is suspended when the parcel is not stamped. Question: Can one infer that Priya is rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009345", "pair_id": "u009345-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009345-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1ab6a5766a06e88c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u009345-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is not stamped. Quentin has a barcode. Priya is consolidated. Priya has no barcode. Quentin is not stamped.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is not undeliverable, that parcel is not fragile. Item B. When the parcel is refrigerated, that parcel is not rerouted. Item C. When the parcel is consolidated, that parcel is refrigerated. Item D. When the parcel has a barcode, that parcel is damaged. Item E. When the parcel is refrigerated, that parcel is rerouted. Item F. When the parcel is consolidated, that parcel is not scanned. Item A is suspended when the parcel is not consolidated. Item C is suspended when the parcel is undeliverable. Item B is suspended when the parcel is stamped. Item D is suspended when the parcel is not stamped. Item E is suspended when the parcel is not stamped. Question: Can one infer that Priya is rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u009345", "pair_id": "u009345-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009345-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e50b0e2d6b283b1d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u009428-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile is registered. Odile is not damaged. Ulla is stamped. Odile is stamped. Mirela is not perishable. Odile has a courier. Odile is not delayed. Ulla is not registered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby is not fragile. Point B. If said parcel is damaged, it thereby is weighed. Point C. If said parcel is perishable, it thereby is not oversized. Point D. If said parcel is sealed, it thereby is undeliverable. Point E. If said parcel has a locker slot, it thereby is labeled. Point F. If said parcel is tracked, it thereby is scanned. Point G. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby is fragile. Point H. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby has a locker slot. Point I. If said parcel is stamped, it thereby is tracked. Point J. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby is misrouted. Point K. If said parcel is registered, it thereby is refrigerated. Point L. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby is sealed. Point M. If said parcel is perishable, it thereby is oversized. Point N. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby is not scanned. Point D is cancelled if said parcel is perishable. Point D is cancelled if said parcel is delayed. Point M supersedes Point C. Point A supersedes Point G. Point N supersedes Point F. Question: Which choice is true for Odile?", "options": ["is misrouted", "is scanned", "is labeled", "is undeliverable", "is fragile"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is scanned", "unit_id": "u009428", "pair_id": "u009428-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009428-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "043686823030e72d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a2", "a0", "a14", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009428-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile is not registered. Odile is not damaged. Ulla is stamped. Odile is stamped. Mirela is not perishable. Odile has a courier. Odile is not delayed. Ulla is not registered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby is not fragile. Point B. If said parcel is damaged, it thereby is weighed. Point C. If said parcel is perishable, it thereby is not oversized. Point D. If said parcel is sealed, it thereby is undeliverable. Point E. If said parcel has a locker slot, it thereby is labeled. Point F. If said parcel is tracked, it thereby is scanned. Point G. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby is fragile. Point H. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby has a locker slot. Point I. If said parcel is stamped, it thereby is tracked. Point J. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby is misrouted. Point K. If said parcel is registered, it thereby is refrigerated. Point L. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby is sealed. Point M. If said parcel is perishable, it thereby is oversized. Point N. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby is not scanned. Point D is cancelled if said parcel is perishable. Point D is cancelled if said parcel is delayed. Point M supersedes Point C. Point A supersedes Point G. Point N supersedes Point F. Question: Which choice is true for Odile?", "options": ["is misrouted", "is scanned", "is labeled", "is undeliverable", "is fragile"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is scanned", "unit_id": "u009428", "pair_id": "u009428-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009428-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f3ee27e33ad2bc72", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a2", "a0", "a14", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009671-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara has a claim frequency of 48. Yara has a peril factor of 68. Yara is grandfathered.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it has flood coverage. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is covered: then it is indemnified. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is subrogated: then it has an adjuster. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam: then it has roadside assistance. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is grandfathered: then it has no adjuster. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster: then it is a smoker. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder has a claim frequency no lower than 48: then it has a dashcam. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder has roadside assistance: then it has a beneficiary. Policy IX. Suppose that policyholder has a claim frequency smaller than 48: then it is covered. Policy X. Suppose that policyholder is grandfathered: then it is litigated. Policy XI. Suppose that policyholder has a peril factor higher than 27: then it is subrogated. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy III. Question: Which choice is right for Yara?", "options": ["has a beneficiary", "has flood coverage", "is a smoker"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a beneficiary", "unit_id": "u009671", "pair_id": "u009671-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009671-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bfeb6607af43a6e2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a3", "a8"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u009671-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara has a claim frequency of 27. Yara has a peril factor of 68. Yara is grandfathered.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it has flood coverage. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is covered: then it is indemnified. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is subrogated: then it has an adjuster. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam: then it has roadside assistance. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is grandfathered: then it has no adjuster. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster: then it is a smoker. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder has a claim frequency no lower than 48: then it has a dashcam. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder has roadside assistance: then it has a beneficiary. Policy IX. Suppose that policyholder has a claim frequency smaller than 48: then it is covered. Policy X. Suppose that policyholder is grandfathered: then it is litigated. Policy XI. Suppose that policyholder has a peril factor higher than 27: then it is subrogated. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy III. Question: Which choice is right for Yara?", "options": ["has a beneficiary", "has flood coverage", "is a smoker"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has flood coverage", "unit_id": "u009671", "pair_id": "u009671-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009671-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d4a95965ee680038", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a3", "a8"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u009681-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra has industry backing. Electra is preregistered. Electra is cofunded. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is not budgeted. Electra has ethics clearance. Electra is not multicenter.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is collaborative provided that it is translational. Section 2: a proposal is a pilot study provided that it is collaborative as well as is preregistered. Section 3: a proposal is not collaborative provided that it is cofunded as well as is translational as well as is budgeted. Section 4: a proposal is not a pilot study provided that it is collaborative as well as has industry backing. Section 5: a proposal has no seed funding provided that it has a steering committee as well as has industry backing as well as has ethics clearance. Section 6: a proposal has seed funding provided that it is preregistered. Section 1 lapses for a proposal if it is multicenter as well as is budgeted. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Electra is a pilot study. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009681", "pair_id": "u009681-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009681-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "98a944c00cf44cf1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u009681-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra has industry backing. Electra is preregistered. Electra is cofunded. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is not budgeted. Electra is translational. Electra has ethics clearance. Electra is not multicenter.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is collaborative provided that it is translational. Section 2: a proposal is a pilot study provided that it is collaborative as well as is preregistered. Section 3: a proposal is not collaborative provided that it is cofunded as well as is translational as well as is budgeted. Section 4: a proposal is not a pilot study provided that it is collaborative as well as has industry backing. Section 5: a proposal has no seed funding provided that it has a steering committee as well as has industry backing as well as has ethics clearance. Section 6: a proposal has seed funding provided that it is preregistered. Section 1 lapses for a proposal if it is multicenter as well as is budgeted. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Electra is a pilot study. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u009681", "pair_id": "u009681-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009681-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "87d5ebaac074007b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u009684-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has a mobility rank of 15. Florin is hypertensive. Gunnar has a fever reading of 26. Dorian has a fever reading of 71. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 87. Wendel is hypertensive. Dorian has no pacemaker. Florin has a fever reading of 44. Gunnar has no pacemaker. Gunnar is not hypertensive. Wendel has a mobility rank of 73. Dorian has a mobility rank of 83. Florin has a pain level of 11. Gunnar has a pain level of 99. Wendel has a pain level of 97. Gunnar has a caregiver.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here has a mobility rank beyond 76 while has a pain level beneath 62 while has a fever reading beneath 65, thus it is not asthmatic. Provision 2: when the patient here is not asthmatic, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 3: when the patient here has a caregiver while is hypertensive while has a pain level at or above 18, thus it is pregnant. Provision 4: when the patient here has a mobility rank beyond 76 while has a pain level at or above 62, thus it is asthmatic. Provision 3 has no effect when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 25. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here is hypertensive while has a pacemaker. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Gunnar is asthmatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u009684", "pair_id": "u009684-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009684-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "921ac88a9b6cb0ae", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009684-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has a mobility rank of 15. Florin is hypertensive. Gunnar has a fever reading of 26. Dorian has a fever reading of 71. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 87. Wendel is hypertensive. Dorian has no pacemaker. Florin has a fever reading of 44. Gunnar has no pacemaker. Gunnar is not hypertensive. Wendel has a mobility rank of 73. Dorian has a mobility rank of 83. Florin has a pain level of 11. Gunnar has a pain level of 99. Wendel has a pain level of 97. Gunnar has a caregiver.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here has a mobility rank beyond 76 while has a pain level beneath 62 while has a fever reading beneath 65, thus it is not asthmatic. Provision 2: when the patient here is asthmatic, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 3: when the patient here has a caregiver while is hypertensive while has a pain level at or above 18, thus it is pregnant. Provision 4: when the patient here has a mobility rank beyond 76 while has a pain level at or above 62, thus it is asthmatic. Provision 3 has no effect when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 25. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here is hypertensive while has a pacemaker. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Gunnar is asthmatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u009684", "pair_id": "u009684-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009684-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "01f43ae0cdebbf80", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009704-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not profiled. Quartz is not profiled. Talc has no feature toggle. Talc is profiled. Talc is not merged. Quartz has a feature toggle.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has no feature toggle, it thereby is not reproducible. Point B. If said build is tested, it thereby has a security advisory. Point C. If said build has a security advisory, it thereby is compiled. Point D. If said build is profiled, it thereby is backported. Point E. If said build is versioned, it thereby is not compiled. Point F. If said build is backported, it thereby is versioned. Point G. If said build is merged, it thereby is tested. Question: Statement: Quartz is compiled. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009704", "pair_id": "u009704-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009704-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "8b47be3aca059c5b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009704-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not profiled. Quartz is not profiled. Talc has no feature toggle. Talc is profiled. Talc is not merged. Quartz has a feature toggle.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a feature toggle, it thereby is not reproducible. Point B. If said build is tested, it thereby has a security advisory. Point C. If said build has a security advisory, it thereby is compiled. Point D. If said build is profiled, it thereby is backported. Point E. If said build is versioned, it thereby is not compiled. Point F. If said build is backported, it thereby is versioned. Point G. If said build is merged, it thereby is tested. Question: Statement: Quartz is compiled. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009704", "pair_id": "u009704-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009704-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "eb642ced55cae795", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009704-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not profiled. Quartz is not profiled. Talc has no feature toggle. Talc is profiled. Talc is not merged. Quartz has a feature toggle.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has no feature toggle, so it is not reproducible. No. 2 While the given build is tested, so it has a security advisory. No. 3 While the given build has a security advisory, so it is compiled. No. 4 While the given build is profiled, so it is backported. No. 5 While the given build is versioned, so it is not compiled. No. 6 While the given build is backported, so it is versioned. No. 7 While the given build is merged, so it is tested. Question: Is the claim \"Quartz is compiled\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009704", "pair_id": "u009704-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009704-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "8b47be3aca059c5b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009704-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not profiled. Quartz is not profiled. Talc has no feature toggle. Talc is profiled. Talc is not merged. Quartz has a feature toggle.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a feature toggle, so it is not reproducible. No. 2 While the given build is tested, so it has a security advisory. No. 3 While the given build has a security advisory, so it is compiled. No. 4 While the given build is profiled, so it is backported. No. 5 While the given build is versioned, so it is not compiled. No. 6 While the given build is backported, so it is versioned. No. 7 While the given build is merged, so it is tested. Question: Is the claim \"Quartz is compiled\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009704", "pair_id": "u009704-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009704-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "eb642ced55cae795", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009722-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is not a smoker. Edda has an adjuster. Edda is indemnified. Edda is not grandfathered.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has no adjuster, then it has a rider. (2) If a policyholder is a smoker, then it is subrogated. (3) If a policyholder is not grandfathered, then it is uninsurable. (4) If a policyholder is a smoker, then it is not subrogated. (5) If a policyholder is a smoker, then it has roadside assistance. (4) is void if the policyholder is not indemnified. (5) is void if the policyholder has an adjuster. (2) is void if the policyholder is indemnified. (2) is void if the policyholder is indemnified. Question: Is it true that Edda is subrogated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009722", "pair_id": "u009722-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009722-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "92c015240e22f425", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009722-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is not a smoker. Edda has an adjuster. Edda is indemnified. Edda is not grandfathered.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has no adjuster, then it has a rider. (2) If a policyholder is a smoker, then it is subrogated. (3) If a policyholder is grandfathered, then it is uninsurable. (4) If a policyholder is a smoker, then it is not subrogated. (5) If a policyholder is a smoker, then it has roadside assistance. (4) is void if the policyholder is not indemnified. (5) is void if the policyholder has an adjuster. (2) is void if the policyholder is indemnified. (2) is void if the policyholder is indemnified. Question: Is it true that Edda is subrogated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009722", "pair_id": "u009722-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009722-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ed179bbe63455ca4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009722-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is not a smoker. Edda has an adjuster. Edda is indemnified. Edda is not grandfathered.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has no adjuster, it also has a rider. Clause 2: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is subrogated. Clause 3: once any policyholder is not grandfathered, it also is uninsurable. Clause 4: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is not subrogated. Clause 5: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also has roadside assistance. Clause 4 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is not indemnified. Clause 5 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has an adjuster. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is indemnified. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is indemnified. Question: Does it follow that Edda is subrogated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009722", "pair_id": "u009722-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009722-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "92c015240e22f425", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009722-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is not a smoker. Edda has an adjuster. Edda is indemnified. Edda is not grandfathered.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has no adjuster, it also has a rider. Clause 2: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is subrogated. Clause 3: once any policyholder is grandfathered, it also is uninsurable. Clause 4: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is not subrogated. Clause 5: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also has roadside assistance. Clause 4 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is not indemnified. Clause 5 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has an adjuster. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is indemnified. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is indemnified. Question: Does it follow that Edda is subrogated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009722", "pair_id": "u009722-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009722-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ed179bbe63455ca4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009738-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif has a fever reading of 22. Elif is waitlisted. Elif is fasting.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is ambulatory: then it is admitted. Policy II. Suppose that patient is hypertensive: then it has a chaperone. Policy III. Suppose that patient has a fever reading higher than 88: then it is referred. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is fasting: then it is not allergic. Policy V. Suppose that patient is asthmatic: then it is not ambulatory. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is referred: then it is ambulatory. Question: Is it so that Elif is ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009738", "pair_id": "u009738-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009738-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "f53f544bca8c9626", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009738-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif has a fever reading of 22. Elif is waitlisted. Elif is fasting.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is ambulatory: then it is admitted. Policy II. Suppose that patient is hypertensive: then it has a chaperone. Policy III. Suppose that patient has a fever reading higher than 88: then it is referred. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is fasting: then it is not allergic. Policy V. Suppose that patient is waitlisted: then it is asthmatic. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is asthmatic: then it is not ambulatory. Policy VII. Suppose that patient is referred: then it is ambulatory. Question: Is it so that Elif is ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u009738", "pair_id": "u009738-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009738-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "3a49df658f6bf830", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009743-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has no diploma. Jasna has no visa. Jasna is not certified. Olek has a signing bonus. Petra has a visa. Petra has a portfolio. Teodor has a portfolio. Jasna is a veteran. Teodor has no signing bonus. Teodor is certified. Olek has a diploma. Olek has a portfolio. Petra is not a veteran. Jasna has a signing bonus. Teodor is a veteran. Teodor has a diploma. Petra has no diploma. Olek is bonded. Teodor has a visa.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is licensed provided that it has a visa as well as is a veteran. Section 2: a candidate is seasoned provided that it has a portfolio. Section 3: a candidate is not unionized provided that it is seasoned as well as is certified as well as has a visa. Section 4: a candidate is onboarded provided that it is bonded as well as has a diploma as well as has a visa. Section 5: a candidate is unionized provided that it is seasoned as well as is certified as well as has a signing bonus. Question: Teodor is unionized. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u009743", "pair_id": "u009743-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009743-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "98f213a92396dba5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009743-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has no diploma. Jasna has no visa. Jasna is not certified. Olek has a signing bonus. Petra has a visa. Petra has a portfolio. Teodor has a portfolio. Jasna is a veteran. Teodor has no signing bonus. Teodor is certified. Olek has a diploma. Olek has a portfolio. Petra is not a veteran. Jasna has a signing bonus. Teodor is not a veteran. Teodor has a diploma. Petra has no diploma. Olek is bonded. Teodor has a visa.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is licensed provided that it has a visa as well as is a veteran. Section 2: a candidate is seasoned provided that it has a portfolio. Section 3: a candidate is not unionized provided that it is seasoned as well as is certified as well as has a visa. Section 4: a candidate is onboarded provided that it is bonded as well as has a diploma as well as has a visa. Section 5: a candidate is unionized provided that it is seasoned as well as is certified as well as has a signing bonus. Question: Teodor is unionized. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u009743", "pair_id": "u009743-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009743-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "479b499474d926fb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009770-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is backed up. Borealis is not isolated. Borealis has no public endpoint. Borealis is replicated. Borealis is sharded.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is not isolated and additionally is replicated, it then is containerized. #2 Each time a workload is deprecated and additionally is provisioned and additionally is mirrored, it then is sandboxed. #3 Each time a workload has a public endpoint and additionally is sharded, it then is mirrored. #4 Each time a workload is provisioned, it then is encrypted. #5 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is stateless. #6 Each time a workload is containerized and additionally is replicated, it then is deprecated. #7 Each time a workload is deprecated and additionally is backed up, it then is not sandboxed. Question: Do the terms above show that Borealis is sandboxed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u009770", "pair_id": "u009770-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009770-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "5bd9a2d0a99dd128", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u009770-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is backed up. Borealis is not isolated. Borealis has no public endpoint. Borealis is replicated. Borealis is sharded.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is isolated and additionally is replicated, it then is containerized. #2 Each time a workload is deprecated and additionally is provisioned and additionally is mirrored, it then is sandboxed. #3 Each time a workload has a public endpoint and additionally is sharded, it then is mirrored. #4 Each time a workload is provisioned, it then is encrypted. #5 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is stateless. #6 Each time a workload is containerized and additionally is replicated, it then is deprecated. #7 Each time a workload is deprecated and additionally is backed up, it then is not sandboxed. Question: Do the terms above show that Borealis is sandboxed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009770", "pair_id": "u009770-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009770-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "e2123f29beb70cb1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u009785-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not notarized. Gneiss has a migration script. Mica is not compiled. Mica is not notarized. Zircon is linted. Zircon is not merged. Zircon has a migration script. Gneiss is not merged. Zircon is notarized. Zircon is minified. Zircon is compiled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is obsolete, it also is profiled. Clause 2: once any build has a migration script, it also is tagged. Clause 3: once any build is profiled, it also is reverted. Clause 4: once any build is notarized, it also is obsolete. Clause 5: once any build is profiled, it also is not reverted. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build is compiled. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build is minified. Clause 5 does not hold for a build when any build is linted. Clause 4 does not hold for a build when any build is merged. Clause 3 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Zircon is reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009785", "pair_id": "u009785-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009785-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f2ab2e093f55cf53", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u009785-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not notarized. Gneiss has a migration script. Mica is not compiled. Mica is not notarized. Zircon is linted. Zircon is not merged. Zircon has a migration script. Gneiss is not merged. Zircon is notarized. Zircon is minified. Zircon is compiled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is obsolete, it also is profiled. Clause 2: once any build has a migration script, it also is tagged. Clause 3: once any build is profiled, it also is reverted. Clause 4: once any build is notarized, it also is obsolete. Clause 5: once any build is profiled, it also is not reverted. Clause 2 does not hold for a build when any build is minified. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build is compiled. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build is minified. Clause 5 does not hold for a build when any build is linted. Clause 4 does not hold for a build when any build is merged. Clause 3 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Zircon is reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009785", "pair_id": "u009785-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009785-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "546a18c210cf4c4f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u009816-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel has a latency budget of 78. Quasar is not sharded. Tundra has a CPU quota of 11. Tundra is encrypted. Tundra is not replicated. Quasar is encrypted. Tundra is not sharded. Kestrel is encrypted. Tundra is not deprecated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload has a CPU quota over 60, it also is not idle. Clause 2: once any workload is encrypted and also has a CPU quota under 46, it also is not isolated. Clause 3: once any workload is deprecated, it also is not autoscaled. Clause 4: once any workload is not isolated, it also has a firewall. Clause 5: once any workload is encrypted and also has a CPU quota of 46 or more, it also is isolated. Clause 2 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not sharded and also has a latency budget of 69 or more. Clause 4 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a CPU quota of 12 or more. Question: Does it follow that Tundra is isolated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u009816", "pair_id": "u009816-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009816-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bbf40894e083432e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 34}}
{"id": "syn-u009816-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel has a latency budget of 78. Quasar is not sharded. Tundra has a CPU quota of 83. Tundra is encrypted. Tundra is not replicated. Quasar is encrypted. Tundra is not sharded. Kestrel is encrypted. Tundra is not deprecated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload has a CPU quota over 60, it also is not idle. Clause 2: once any workload is encrypted and also has a CPU quota under 46, it also is not isolated. Clause 3: once any workload is deprecated, it also is not autoscaled. Clause 4: once any workload is not isolated, it also has a firewall. Clause 5: once any workload is encrypted and also has a CPU quota of 46 or more, it also is isolated. Clause 2 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not sharded and also has a latency budget of 69 or more. Clause 4 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a CPU quota of 12 or more. Question: Does it follow that Tundra is isolated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u009816", "pair_id": "u009816-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009816-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c4a005c9d3b55066", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 34}}
{"id": "syn-u009822-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hamid is not a depositor. Hamid is pensioned. Hamid has a risk tier of 37. Folke is not a depositor. Hamid has a credit rating of 25.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is overdrawn, so it has a mortgage. No. 2 While the given borrower has a mortgage and likewise has a risk tier not below 36, so it is not refinanced. No. 3 While the given borrower is a depositor and likewise has a credit rating that falls below 29, so it is amortized. No. 4 While the given borrower has a credit rating not above 64 and likewise is pensioned, so it is overdrawn. No. 5 While the given borrower has a mortgage and likewise has a risk tier that falls below 85 and likewise is underwritten, so it is refinanced. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a credit rating that exceeds 47. No. 5 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Hamid is refinanced\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u009822", "pair_id": "u009822-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009822-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7c568ade9ed3cf3d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u009822-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hamid is not a depositor. Hamid is pensioned. Hamid has a risk tier of 37. Folke is not a depositor. Hamid has a credit rating of 25.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is overdrawn, so it has a mortgage. No. 2 While the given borrower has a mortgage and likewise has a risk tier not below 85, so it is not refinanced. No. 3 While the given borrower is a depositor and likewise has a credit rating that falls below 29, so it is amortized. No. 4 While the given borrower has a credit rating not above 64 and likewise is pensioned, so it is overdrawn. No. 5 While the given borrower has a mortgage and likewise has a risk tier that falls below 85 and likewise is underwritten, so it is refinanced. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a credit rating that exceeds 47. No. 5 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Hamid is refinanced\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009822", "pair_id": "u009822-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009822-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c3c3eea2ee27411e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u009860-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is sedated. Vilja is not ambulatory. Dorian is anemic. Dorian is ambulatory. Dorian is referred. Vilja is anemic.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is sedated: then it is not fasting. Policy II. Suppose that patient is ambulatory: then it has a pacemaker. Policy III. Suppose that patient has a pacemaker: then it has no interpreter. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a pacemaker: then it has an interpreter. Policy IV is waived if that patient is anemic. Policy III is waived if that patient is not anemic. Policy III is waived if that patient is not referred. Question: Is it so that Dorian has an interpreter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u009860", "pair_id": "u009860-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009860-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9aceefaf7d6c2022", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009860-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is sedated. Vilja is not ambulatory. Dorian is anemic. Dorian is ambulatory. Dorian is referred. Vilja is anemic.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is sedated: then it is not fasting. Policy II. Suppose that patient is not ambulatory: then it has a pacemaker. Policy III. Suppose that patient has a pacemaker: then it has no interpreter. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a pacemaker: then it has an interpreter. Policy IV is waived if that patient is anemic. Policy III is waived if that patient is not anemic. Policy III is waived if that patient is not referred. Question: Is it so that Dorian has an interpreter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009860", "pair_id": "u009860-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009860-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bad2d2c88575e0fe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009860-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is sedated. Vilja is not ambulatory. Dorian is anemic. Dorian is ambulatory. Dorian is referred. Vilja is anemic.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is sedated, it then is not fasting. #2 Each time a patient is ambulatory, it then has a pacemaker. #3 Each time a patient has a pacemaker, it then has no interpreter. #4 Each time a patient has a pacemaker, it then has an interpreter. #4 is set aside if a patient is anemic. #3 is set aside if a patient is not anemic. #3 is set aside if a patient is not referred. Question: Do the terms above show that Dorian has an interpreter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u009860", "pair_id": "u009860-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009860-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9aceefaf7d6c2022", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009860-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is sedated. Vilja is not ambulatory. Dorian is anemic. Dorian is ambulatory. Dorian is referred. Vilja is anemic.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is sedated, it then is not fasting. #2 Each time a patient is not ambulatory, it then has a pacemaker. #3 Each time a patient has a pacemaker, it then has no interpreter. #4 Each time a patient has a pacemaker, it then has an interpreter. #4 is set aside if a patient is anemic. #3 is set aside if a patient is not anemic. #3 is set aside if a patient is not referred. Question: Do the terms above show that Dorian has an interpreter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009860", "pair_id": "u009860-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009860-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bad2d2c88575e0fe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009862-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is backported. Feldspar is not tagged. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is not backported. Gneiss is not minified. Gneiss is not obsolete. Feldspar is minified. Gneiss is backported. Zircon is minified.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is not obsolete, it thereby is benchmarked. Point B. If said build has a security advisory, it thereby is not signed. Point C. If said build is notarized, it thereby is linted. Point D. If said build is experimental, it thereby is signed. Point E. If said build is minified, it thereby has a changelog. Point F. If said build is linted, it thereby has a security advisory. Point G. If said build has a changelog, it thereby has no security advisory. Point H. If said build is backported, it thereby is not compiled. Point I. If said build is benchmarked, it thereby is experimental. Point J. If said build is obsolete, it thereby is compiled. Point K. If said build is tagged, it thereby is not experimental. Point I supersedes Point K. Point F supersedes Point G. Point D supersedes Point B. Point H supersedes Point J. Question: Statement: Gneiss is signed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u009862", "pair_id": "u009862-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009862-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cbdeacf26105faab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u009862-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is backported. Feldspar is not tagged. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is not backported. Gneiss is not minified. Gneiss is not obsolete. Feldspar is minified. Gneiss is backported. Zircon is minified.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is obsolete, it thereby is benchmarked. Point B. If said build has a security advisory, it thereby is not signed. Point C. If said build is notarized, it thereby is linted. Point D. If said build is experimental, it thereby is signed. Point E. If said build is minified, it thereby has a changelog. Point F. If said build is linted, it thereby has a security advisory. Point G. If said build has a changelog, it thereby has no security advisory. Point H. If said build is backported, it thereby is not compiled. Point I. If said build is benchmarked, it thereby is experimental. Point J. If said build is obsolete, it thereby is compiled. Point K. If said build is tagged, it thereby is not experimental. Point I supersedes Point K. Point F supersedes Point G. Point D supersedes Point B. Point H supersedes Point J. Question: Statement: Gneiss is signed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009862", "pair_id": "u009862-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009862-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "ae1f47f782d4ab90", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u009862-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is backported. Feldspar is not tagged. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is not backported. Gneiss is not minified. Gneiss is not obsolete. Feldspar is minified. Gneiss is backported. Zircon is minified.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is not obsolete, so it is benchmarked. No. 2 While the given build has a security advisory, so it is not signed. No. 3 While the given build is notarized, so it is linted. No. 4 While the given build is experimental, so it is signed. No. 5 While the given build is minified, so it has a changelog. No. 6 While the given build is linted, so it has a security advisory. No. 7 While the given build has a changelog, so it has no security advisory. No. 8 While the given build is backported, so it is not compiled. No. 9 While the given build is benchmarked, so it is experimental. No. 10 While the given build is obsolete, so it is compiled. No. 11 While the given build is tagged, so it is not experimental. No. 9 wins over No. 11. No. 6 wins over No. 7. No. 4 wins over No. 2. No. 8 wins over No. 10. Question: Is the claim \"Gneiss is signed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u009862", "pair_id": "u009862-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009862-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cbdeacf26105faab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u009862-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is backported. Feldspar is not tagged. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is not backported. Gneiss is not minified. Gneiss is not obsolete. Feldspar is minified. Gneiss is backported. Zircon is minified.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is obsolete, so it is benchmarked. No. 2 While the given build has a security advisory, so it is not signed. No. 3 While the given build is notarized, so it is linted. No. 4 While the given build is experimental, so it is signed. No. 5 While the given build is minified, so it has a changelog. No. 6 While the given build is linted, so it has a security advisory. No. 7 While the given build has a changelog, so it has no security advisory. No. 8 While the given build is backported, so it is not compiled. No. 9 While the given build is benchmarked, so it is experimental. No. 10 While the given build is obsolete, so it is compiled. No. 11 While the given build is tagged, so it is not experimental. No. 9 wins over No. 11. No. 6 wins over No. 7. No. 4 wins over No. 2. No. 8 wins over No. 10. Question: Is the claim \"Gneiss is signed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009862", "pair_id": "u009862-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009862-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "ae1f47f782d4ab90", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u009881-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has a pacemaker. Florin is symptomatic. Elif is sedated. Wendel has a pulse rate of 82. Florin has a pulse rate of 71. Florin is hypertensive. Florin has no caregiver. Wendel has no caregiver. Wendel is symptomatic. Elif is hypertensive. Aurel is not hypertensive. Elif is not symptomatic. Wendel has a pacemaker. Wendel is hypertensive. Aurel has a caregiver. Aurel has a pulse rate of 63. Wendel is not sedated. Aurel is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is not anemic plus is not sedated plus has a pacemaker: then it is not bedridden. Policy II. Suppose that patient is referred plus is hypertensive: then it is not anemic. Policy III. Suppose that patient is not anemic plus is sedated plus has no pacemaker: then it is bedridden. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is not waitlisted plus has a pain level no higher than 83: then it is vaccinated. Policy V. Suppose that patient has no caregiver: then it is referred. Policy III is waived if that patient is not sedated plus is symptomatic. Policy IV is waived if that patient has a pacemaker. Question: Is it so that Wendel is not bedridden?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u009881", "pair_id": "u009881-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009881-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "68824b86c6914fa3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 20}}
{"id": "syn-u009881-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has a pacemaker. Florin is symptomatic. Elif is sedated. Wendel has a pulse rate of 82. Florin has a pulse rate of 71. Florin is hypertensive. Florin has no caregiver. Wendel has no caregiver. Wendel is symptomatic. Elif is hypertensive. Aurel is not hypertensive. Elif is not symptomatic. Wendel has a pacemaker. Wendel is hypertensive. Aurel has a caregiver. Aurel has a pulse rate of 63. Wendel is not sedated. Aurel is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is not anemic plus is not sedated plus has a pacemaker: then it is not bedridden. Policy II. Suppose that patient is referred plus is hypertensive: then it is not anemic. Policy III. Suppose that patient is not anemic plus is sedated plus has no pacemaker: then it is bedridden. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is not waitlisted plus has a pain level no higher than 83: then it is vaccinated. Policy V. Suppose that patient has a pulse rate higher than 52: then it is not postoperative. Policy VI. Suppose that patient has no caregiver: then it is referred. Policy III is waived if that patient is not sedated plus is symptomatic. Policy IV is waived if that patient has a pacemaker. Question: Is it so that Wendel is not bedridden?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u009881", "pair_id": "u009881-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009881-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "03bebd1567145456", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 20}}
{"id": "syn-u009881-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has a pacemaker. Florin is symptomatic. Elif is sedated. Wendel has a pulse rate of 82. Florin has a pulse rate of 71. Florin is hypertensive. Florin has no caregiver. Wendel has no caregiver. Wendel is symptomatic. Elif is hypertensive. Aurel is not hypertensive. Elif is not symptomatic. Wendel has a pacemaker. Wendel is hypertensive. Aurel has a caregiver. Aurel has a pulse rate of 63. Wendel is not sedated. Aurel is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is not anemic and additionally is not sedated and additionally has a pacemaker, it then is not bedridden. #2 Each time a patient is referred and additionally is hypertensive, it then is not anemic. #3 Each time a patient is not anemic and additionally is sedated and additionally has no pacemaker, it then is bedridden. #4 Each time a patient is not waitlisted and additionally has a pain level of 83 or below, it then is vaccinated. #5 Each time a patient has no caregiver, it then is referred. #3 is set aside if a patient is not sedated and additionally is symptomatic. #4 is set aside if a patient has a pacemaker. Question: Do the terms above show that Wendel is not bedridden?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u009881", "pair_id": "u009881-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009881-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "68824b86c6914fa3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 20}}
{"id": "syn-u009881-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has a pacemaker. Florin is symptomatic. Elif is sedated. Wendel has a pulse rate of 82. Florin has a pulse rate of 71. Florin is hypertensive. Florin has no caregiver. Wendel has no caregiver. Wendel is symptomatic. Elif is hypertensive. Aurel is not hypertensive. Elif is not symptomatic. Wendel has a pacemaker. Wendel is hypertensive. Aurel has a caregiver. Aurel has a pulse rate of 63. Wendel is not sedated. Aurel is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is not anemic and additionally is not sedated and additionally has a pacemaker, it then is not bedridden. #2 Each time a patient is referred and additionally is hypertensive, it then is not anemic. #3 Each time a patient is not anemic and additionally is sedated and additionally has no pacemaker, it then is bedridden. #4 Each time a patient is not waitlisted and additionally has a pain level of 83 or below, it then is vaccinated. #5 Each time a patient has a pulse rate greater than 52, it then is not postoperative. #6 Each time a patient has no caregiver, it then is referred. #3 is set aside if a patient is not sedated and additionally is symptomatic. #4 is set aside if a patient has a pacemaker. Question: Do the terms above show that Wendel is not bedridden?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u009881", "pair_id": "u009881-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009881-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "03bebd1567145456", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 20}}
{"id": "syn-u009959-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is a graduate. Noor is not freelance. Noor has a visa. Noor has a notice period of 37.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is bonded, it also is headhunted. Clause 2: once any candidate is freelance, it also is bonded. Clause 3: once any candidate is seasoned, it also has a diploma. Clause 4: once any candidate is headhunted, it also is not a veteran. Clause 5: once any candidate has a diploma, it also is a veteran. Clause 6: once any candidate has a visa, it also is seasoned. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Noor is a veteran?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u009959", "pair_id": "u009959-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009959-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "08e14a18e9611ec8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u009959-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is a graduate. Noor is not freelance. Noor has a visa. Noor has a notice period of 37.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is bonded, it also is headhunted. Clause 2: once any candidate is freelance, it also is bonded. Clause 3: once any candidate is seasoned, it also has a diploma. Clause 4: once any candidate is headhunted, it also is not a veteran. Clause 5: once any candidate has a notice period under 28, it also is not relocating. Clause 6: once any candidate has a diploma, it also is a veteran. Clause 7: once any candidate has a visa, it also is seasoned. Clause 6 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Noor is a veteran?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u009959", "pair_id": "u009959-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009959-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a0fe3704e934e675", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u009961-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is not oversized. Jory is prepaid. Jory is not undeliverable. Jory is not palletized. Jory is refrigerated. Jory is scanned. Jory is not labeled. Jory is not delayed. Jory is damaged. Jory is weighed. Jory is sealed. Jory has no locker slot.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has no courier and additionally is not oversized, it then has a waybill. #2 Each time a parcel is not scanned, it then is not stamped. #3 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally has a locker slot and additionally is not consolidated, it then is hazardous. #4 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally is not weighed, it then is rerouted. #5 Each time a parcel is sealed, it then is not consolidated. #6 Each time a parcel is damaged, it then is not fragile. #7 Each time a parcel is refrigerated, it then has no courier. #8 Each time a parcel is not palletized and additionally is not delayed, it then is perishable. #9 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally is weighed and additionally has a locker slot, it then is fragile. #10 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally is not prepaid and additionally is not labeled, it then is stamped. #11 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally is not undeliverable and additionally is prepaid, it then is registered. #11 is set aside if a parcel has a locker slot. #2 yields to #10. #6 yields to #9. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Jory?", "options": ["is fragile", "is rerouted", "is hazardous", "is registered", "is stamped"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is registered", "unit_id": "u009961", "pair_id": "u009961-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009961-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fa37d0d08576f7c5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a7", "a16", "a5", "a15"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u009961-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is not oversized. Jory is prepaid. Jory is not undeliverable. Jory is not palletized. Jory is refrigerated. Jory is scanned. Jory is not labeled. Jory is not delayed. Jory is not damaged. Jory is weighed. Jory is sealed. Jory has no locker slot.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has no courier and additionally is not oversized, it then has a waybill. #2 Each time a parcel is not scanned, it then is not stamped. #3 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally has a locker slot and additionally is not consolidated, it then is hazardous. #4 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally is not weighed, it then is rerouted. #5 Each time a parcel is sealed, it then is not consolidated. #6 Each time a parcel is damaged, it then is not fragile. #7 Each time a parcel is refrigerated, it then has no courier. #8 Each time a parcel is not palletized and additionally is not delayed, it then is perishable. #9 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally is weighed and additionally has a locker slot, it then is fragile. #10 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally is not prepaid and additionally is not labeled, it then is stamped. #11 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally is not undeliverable and additionally is prepaid, it then is registered. #11 is set aside if a parcel has a locker slot. #2 yields to #10. #6 yields to #9. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Jory?", "options": ["is fragile", "is rerouted", "is hazardous", "is registered", "is stamped"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is registered", "unit_id": "u009961", "pair_id": "u009961-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009961-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e7c8a33d7159cb04", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a7", "a16", "a5", "a15"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u009977-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian has a chaperone. Gunnar is rescheduled. Wendel is not waitlisted. Wendel has no chaperone. Wendel is not postoperative. Dorian has a fever reading of 21. Dorian is postoperative. Dorian is not waitlisted. Wendel has a mobility rank of 84. Dorian has a pulse rate of 67. Gunnar has a pain level of 11. Dorian is rescheduled. Gunnar is not waitlisted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is symptomatic provided that it has a pain level of 55 or higher as well as has a fever reading of 17 or lower. Section 2: a patient is pregnant provided that it is waitlisted. Section 3: a patient is vaccinated provided that it has a chaperone as well as is postoperative. Section 4: a patient is anemic provided that it is vaccinated as well as has a fever reading exceeding 79 as well as has a pain level of 81 or higher. Section 5: a patient is not anemic provided that it is vaccinated as well as has a fever reading of 79 or lower as well as is rescheduled. Section 6: a patient is triaged provided that it is vaccinated as well as has a fever reading of 62 or lower. Section 3 lapses for a patient if it has a mobility rank of 47 or lower as well as has a pulse rate of 26 or higher. Section 6 lapses for a patient if it has a mobility rank exceeding 20. Section 1 lapses for a patient if it has a fever reading of 53 or lower. Section 2 lapses for a patient if it has a pulse rate of 30 or lower. Question: Dorian is anemic. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u009977", "pair_id": "u009977-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009977-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1dcd66043796a2ae", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009977-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian has a chaperone. Gunnar is rescheduled. Wendel is not waitlisted. Wendel has no chaperone. Wendel is not postoperative. Dorian has a fever reading of 21. Dorian is postoperative. Dorian is waitlisted. Wendel has a mobility rank of 84. Dorian has a pulse rate of 67. Gunnar has a pain level of 11. Dorian is rescheduled. Gunnar is not waitlisted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is symptomatic provided that it has a pain level of 55 or higher as well as has a fever reading of 17 or lower. Section 2: a patient is pregnant provided that it is waitlisted. Section 3: a patient is vaccinated provided that it has a chaperone as well as is postoperative. Section 4: a patient is anemic provided that it is vaccinated as well as has a fever reading exceeding 79 as well as has a pain level of 81 or higher. Section 5: a patient is not anemic provided that it is vaccinated as well as has a fever reading of 79 or lower as well as is rescheduled. Section 6: a patient is triaged provided that it is vaccinated as well as has a fever reading of 62 or lower. Section 3 lapses for a patient if it has a mobility rank of 47 or lower as well as has a pulse rate of 26 or higher. Section 6 lapses for a patient if it has a mobility rank exceeding 20. Section 1 lapses for a patient if it has a fever reading of 53 or lower. Section 2 lapses for a patient if it has a pulse rate of 30 or lower. Question: Dorian is anemic. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u009977", "pair_id": "u009977-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u009977-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "dc14e44a50e6f4c0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009986-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel is waitlisted. Wendel is not vaccinated. Wendel is not admitted. Vilja is not admitted. Wendel is not fasting. Wendel has a pain level of 38. Vilja has a pain level of 73.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is not vaccinated, thus it is not symptomatic. Provision 2: when the patient here is not vaccinated, thus it is symptomatic. Provision 3: when the patient here is admitted, thus it is not contagious. Provision 4: when the patient here is not fasting, thus it is not allergic. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here is not waitlisted. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here has a pain level beneath 72. Provision 2 has no effect when the patient here has a pain level at or above 18. Provision 2 has no effect when the patient here is vaccinated. Question: Would it be right to say that Wendel is symptomatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u009986", "pair_id": "u009986-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009986-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "51aa51c400f572d7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u009986-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel is waitlisted. Wendel is not vaccinated. Wendel is not admitted. Vilja is not admitted. Wendel is not fasting. Wendel has a pain level of 38. Vilja has a pain level of 73.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is not vaccinated, thus it is not symptomatic. Provision 2: when the patient here is not vaccinated, thus it is symptomatic. Provision 3: when the patient here is admitted, thus it is not contagious. Provision 4: when the patient here is not fasting, thus it is not allergic. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here is not waitlisted. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here has a pain level beneath 18. Provision 2 has no effect when the patient here has a pain level at or above 18. Provision 2 has no effect when the patient here is vaccinated. Question: Would it be right to say that Wendel is symptomatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u009986", "pair_id": "u009986-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u009986-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d0161f82e3379229", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010020-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not amortized. Bastien is audited. Tomas is amortized. Bastien is not amortized. Hamid is not amortized. Tomas has collateral.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no cosigner provided that it is not overdrawn. Section 2: a borrower is prequalified provided that it is amortized. Section 3: a borrower is not solvent provided that it is audited. Section 4: a borrower is not overdrawn provided that it is not audited. Section 5: a borrower is creditworthy provided that it is amortized. Section 6: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it is solvent. Section 7: a borrower is indebted provided that it has collateral. Question: Bastien has a cosigner. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010020", "pair_id": "u010020-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010020-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "edc9a8d15146b627", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010020-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not amortized. Bastien is audited. Tomas is amortized. Bastien is not amortized. Hamid is not amortized. Tomas has collateral.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no cosigner provided that it is not overdrawn. Section 2: a borrower is prequalified provided that it is amortized. Section 3: a borrower is not solvent provided that it is audited. Section 4: a borrower is not overdrawn provided that it is not audited. Section 5: a borrower is creditworthy provided that it is amortized. Section 6: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it is not solvent. Section 7: a borrower is indebted provided that it has collateral. Question: Bastien has a cosigner. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010020", "pair_id": "u010020-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010020-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "7cedaaf5c490515d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010020-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not amortized. Bastien is audited. Tomas is amortized. Bastien is not amortized. Hamid is not amortized. Tomas has collateral.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is not overdrawn: then it has no cosigner. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is amortized: then it is prequalified. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is audited: then it is not solvent. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is not audited: then it is not overdrawn. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is amortized: then it is creditworthy. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is solvent: then it has a cosigner. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it is indebted. Question: Is it so that Bastien has a cosigner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010020", "pair_id": "u010020-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010020-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "edc9a8d15146b627", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010020-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not amortized. Bastien is audited. Tomas is amortized. Bastien is not amortized. Hamid is not amortized. Tomas has collateral.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is not overdrawn: then it has no cosigner. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is amortized: then it is prequalified. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is audited: then it is not solvent. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is not audited: then it is not overdrawn. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is amortized: then it is creditworthy. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is not solvent: then it has a cosigner. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it is indebted. Question: Is it so that Bastien has a cosigner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010020", "pair_id": "u010020-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010020-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "7cedaaf5c490515d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010020-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not amortized. Bastien is audited. Tomas is amortized. Bastien is not amortized. Hamid is not amortized. Tomas has collateral.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is not overdrawn, it then has no cosigner. #2 Each time a borrower is amortized, it then is prequalified. #3 Each time a borrower is audited, it then is not solvent. #4 Each time a borrower is not audited, it then is not overdrawn. #5 Each time a borrower is amortized, it then is creditworthy. #6 Each time a borrower is solvent, it then has a cosigner. #7 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then is indebted. Question: Do the terms above show that Bastien has a cosigner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010020", "pair_id": "u010020-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010020-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "edc9a8d15146b627", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010020-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not amortized. Bastien is audited. Tomas is amortized. Bastien is not amortized. Hamid is not amortized. Tomas has collateral.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is not overdrawn, it then has no cosigner. #2 Each time a borrower is amortized, it then is prequalified. #3 Each time a borrower is audited, it then is not solvent. #4 Each time a borrower is not audited, it then is not overdrawn. #5 Each time a borrower is amortized, it then is creditworthy. #6 Each time a borrower is not solvent, it then has a cosigner. #7 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then is indebted. Question: Do the terms above show that Bastien has a cosigner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010020", "pair_id": "u010020-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010020-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "7cedaaf5c490515d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010087-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not localized. Mica is localized. Mica is flaky. Mica is reproducible. Quartz is not reproducible. Basalt is not reproducible. Obsidian is not linted. Quartz is not linted. Mica is not linted. Mica is merged. Obsidian is localized. Obsidian is not flaky. Mica has no security advisory. Basalt is not localized. Mica is reverted. Obsidian is backported.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is tested plus has a security advisory: then it is not versioned. Policy II. Suppose that build is linted: then it is benchmarked. Policy III. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is tested. Policy IV. Suppose that build is tested plus is merged plus is localized: then it is versioned. Policy V. Suppose that build is flaky plus is reproducible plus is localized: then it is fuzzed. Policy VI. Suppose that build is backported plus is reverted: then it is minified. Policy VII. Suppose that build is tested plus is reproducible: then it is not notarized. Question: Is it so that Mica is versioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010087", "pair_id": "u010087-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010087-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "a189623f4e80b233", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010087-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not localized. Mica is backported. Mica is localized. Mica is flaky. Mica is reproducible. Quartz is not reproducible. Basalt is not reproducible. Obsidian is not linted. Quartz is not linted. Mica is not linted. Mica is merged. Obsidian is localized. Obsidian is not flaky. Mica has no security advisory. Basalt is not localized. Mica is reverted. Obsidian is backported.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is tested plus has a security advisory: then it is not versioned. Policy II. Suppose that build is linted: then it is benchmarked. Policy III. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is tested. Policy IV. Suppose that build is tested plus is merged plus is localized: then it is versioned. Policy V. Suppose that build is flaky plus is reproducible plus is localized: then it is fuzzed. Policy VI. Suppose that build is backported plus is reverted: then it is minified. Policy VII. Suppose that build is tested plus is reproducible: then it is not notarized. Question: Is it so that Mica is versioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010087", "pair_id": "u010087-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010087-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "c12e8f969beecbe6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010103-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not uninsurable. Celeste is appraised. Celeste has a claim frequency of 57. Celeste has a premium band of 48. Celeste has a peril factor of 1. Celeste is subrogated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is indemnified and also has a premium band under 87, it also is not reinstated. Clause 2: once any policyholder has a peril factor of 67 or less and also is appraised, it also is indemnified. Clause 3: once any policyholder is indemnified and also has a premium band of 48 or more and also is appraised, it also is reinstated. Clause 4: once any policyholder is indemnified and also has a claim frequency under 57, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a claim frequency over 22, it also is a smoker. Clause 6: once any policyholder is bundled and also is uninsurable and also is subrogated, it also is not a smoker. Clause 3 overrides Clause 1. Clause 6 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Celeste is reinstated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010103", "pair_id": "u010103-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010103-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5a725341f7a4bcef", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010103-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not uninsurable. Celeste is appraised. Celeste has a claim frequency of 57. Celeste has a premium band of 48. Celeste has a peril factor of 1. Celeste is subrogated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is indemnified and also has a premium band under 87, it also is not reinstated. Clause 2: once any policyholder has a peril factor of 67 or less and also is appraised, it also is indemnified. Clause 3: once any policyholder is indemnified and also has a premium band of 87 or more and also is appraised, it also is reinstated. Clause 4: once any policyholder is indemnified and also has a claim frequency under 57, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a claim frequency over 22, it also is a smoker. Clause 6: once any policyholder is bundled and also is uninsurable and also is subrogated, it also is not a smoker. Clause 3 overrides Clause 1. Clause 6 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Celeste is reinstated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010103", "pair_id": "u010103-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010103-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "67afbdb5bd967d92", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010103-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not uninsurable. Celeste is appraised. Celeste has a claim frequency of 57. Celeste has a premium band of 48. Celeste has a peril factor of 1. Celeste is subrogated.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is indemnified, and has a premium band of less than 87, that policyholder is not reinstated. Item B. When the policyholder has a peril factor of no more than 67, and is appraised, that policyholder is indemnified. Item C. When the policyholder is indemnified, and has a premium band of no less than 48, and is appraised, that policyholder is reinstated. Item D. When the policyholder is indemnified, and has a claim frequency of less than 57, that policyholder has a beneficiary. Item E. When the policyholder has a claim frequency of more than 22, that policyholder is a smoker. Item F. When the policyholder is bundled, and is uninsurable, and is subrogated, that policyholder is not a smoker. Item C outranks Item A. Item F outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Celeste is reinstated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010103", "pair_id": "u010103-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010103-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5a725341f7a4bcef", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010103-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not uninsurable. Celeste is appraised. Celeste has a claim frequency of 57. Celeste has a premium band of 48. Celeste has a peril factor of 1. Celeste is subrogated.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is indemnified, and has a premium band of less than 87, that policyholder is not reinstated. Item B. When the policyholder has a peril factor of no more than 67, and is appraised, that policyholder is indemnified. Item C. When the policyholder is indemnified, and has a premium band of no less than 87, and is appraised, that policyholder is reinstated. Item D. When the policyholder is indemnified, and has a claim frequency of less than 57, that policyholder has a beneficiary. Item E. When the policyholder has a claim frequency of more than 22, that policyholder is a smoker. Item F. When the policyholder is bundled, and is uninsurable, and is subrogated, that policyholder is not a smoker. Item C outranks Item A. Item F outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Celeste is reinstated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010103", "pair_id": "u010103-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010103-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "67afbdb5bd967d92", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010204-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has a pacemaker. Florin is pregnant. Florin is postoperative. Florin is fasting. Florin is not admitted. Florin is not contagious. Florin has a fever reading of 85. Florin has a pain level of 96.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is fasting and further has a fever reading in excess of 86, it thereby has no chaperone. Point B. If said patient has a pacemaker and further is pregnant, it thereby is asthmatic. Point C. If said patient has a fever reading in excess of 89 and further is postoperative, it thereby is not rescheduled. Point D. If said patient has a fever reading in excess of 51 and further has a pain level in excess of 13 and further is admitted, it thereby is not allergic. Point E. If said patient is fasting and further has a fever reading of maximum 86, it thereby has a chaperone. Point A is cancelled if said patient is fasting and further is contagious. Point D is cancelled if said patient is contagious. Question: Statement: Florin has a chaperone. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010204", "pair_id": "u010204-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010204-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bdbf3ff293c7f39a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u010204-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has a pacemaker. Florin is pregnant. Florin is postoperative. Florin is fasting. Florin is not admitted. Florin is not contagious. Florin has a fever reading of 88. Florin has a pain level of 96.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is fasting and further has a fever reading in excess of 86, it thereby has no chaperone. Point B. If said patient has a pacemaker and further is pregnant, it thereby is asthmatic. Point C. If said patient has a fever reading in excess of 89 and further is postoperative, it thereby is not rescheduled. Point D. If said patient has a fever reading in excess of 51 and further has a pain level in excess of 13 and further is admitted, it thereby is not allergic. Point E. If said patient is fasting and further has a fever reading of maximum 86, it thereby has a chaperone. Point A is cancelled if said patient is fasting and further is contagious. Point D is cancelled if said patient is contagious. Question: Statement: Florin has a chaperone. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010204", "pair_id": "u010204-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010204-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cef63cf8935178cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u010234-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra has an aptitude quotient of 90. Petra is not seasoned. Petra has a seniority step of 44.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate has a portfolio, it also is a veteran. Clause 2: once any candidate is a veteran and also has an aptitude quotient under 83, it also has a mentor. Clause 3: once any candidate has a seniority step under 43, it also has a portfolio. Clause 4: once any candidate is probationary, it also has a visa. Clause 5: once any candidate is a veteran and also has an aptitude quotient of 83 or more and also is seasoned, it also has no mentor. Clause 3 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is headhunted. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Petra has no mentor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010234", "pair_id": "u010234-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010234-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6cd029bea26de7ad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 23}}
{"id": "syn-u010234-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra has an aptitude quotient of 90. Petra is not seasoned. Petra has a seniority step of 12.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate has a portfolio, it also is a veteran. Clause 2: once any candidate is a veteran and also has an aptitude quotient under 83, it also has a mentor. Clause 3: once any candidate has a seniority step under 43, it also has a portfolio. Clause 4: once any candidate is probationary, it also has a visa. Clause 5: once any candidate is a veteran and also has an aptitude quotient of 83 or more and also is seasoned, it also has no mentor. Clause 3 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is headhunted. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Petra has no mentor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010234", "pair_id": "u010234-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010234-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a2ca00de9c137da5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 23}}
{"id": "syn-u010234-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra has an aptitude quotient of 90. Petra is not seasoned. Petra has a seniority step of 44.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate has a portfolio, that candidate is a veteran. Item B. When the candidate is a veteran, and has an aptitude quotient of less than 83, that candidate has a mentor. Item C. When the candidate has a seniority step of less than 43, that candidate has a portfolio. Item D. When the candidate is probationary, that candidate has a visa. Item E. When the candidate is a veteran, and has an aptitude quotient of no less than 83, and is seasoned, that candidate has no mentor. Item C is suspended when the candidate is headhunted. Item B outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Petra has no mentor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010234", "pair_id": "u010234-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010234-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6cd029bea26de7ad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 23}}
{"id": "syn-u010234-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra has an aptitude quotient of 90. Petra is not seasoned. Petra has a seniority step of 12.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate has a portfolio, that candidate is a veteran. Item B. When the candidate is a veteran, and has an aptitude quotient of less than 83, that candidate has a mentor. Item C. When the candidate has a seniority step of less than 43, that candidate has a portfolio. Item D. When the candidate is probationary, that candidate has a visa. Item E. When the candidate is a veteran, and has an aptitude quotient of no less than 83, and is seasoned, that candidate has no mentor. Item C is suspended when the candidate is headhunted. Item B outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Petra has no mentor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010234", "pair_id": "u010234-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010234-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a2ca00de9c137da5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 23}}
{"id": "syn-u010252-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has a guarantor. Corin is vetted. Corin has an escrow account. Corin is overdrawn. Anouk is not vetted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is indebted and further is a depositor, it thereby has no collateral. Point B. If said borrower has an escrow account, it thereby has a mortgage. Point C. If said borrower has a lien and further is vetted and further has a guarantor, it thereby is indebted. Point D. If said borrower is indebted and further is overdrawn and further is vetted, it thereby has collateral. Point E. If said borrower has a guarantor, it thereby has a lien. Question: Statement: Corin has collateral. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010252", "pair_id": "u010252-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010252-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "bdad9cd60e3869b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010252-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has a guarantor. Corin is vetted. Corin has an escrow account. Corin is overdrawn. Anouk is not vetted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is indebted and further is a depositor, it thereby has no collateral. Point B. If said borrower has an escrow account, it thereby has a mortgage. Point C. If said borrower has a lien, it thereby is underwritten. Point D. If said borrower has a lien and further is vetted and further has a guarantor, it thereby is indebted. Point E. If said borrower is indebted and further is overdrawn and further is vetted, it thereby has collateral. Point F. If said borrower has a guarantor, it thereby has a lien. Question: Statement: Corin has collateral. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010252", "pair_id": "u010252-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010252-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "c693219272f64715", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010252-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has a guarantor. Corin is vetted. Corin has an escrow account. Corin is overdrawn. Anouk is not vetted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is indebted and likewise is a depositor, so it has no collateral. No. 2 While the given borrower has an escrow account, so it has a mortgage. No. 3 While the given borrower has a lien and likewise is vetted and likewise has a guarantor, so it is indebted. No. 4 While the given borrower is indebted and likewise is overdrawn and likewise is vetted, so it has collateral. No. 5 While the given borrower has a guarantor, so it has a lien. Question: Is the claim \"Corin has collateral\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010252", "pair_id": "u010252-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010252-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "bdad9cd60e3869b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010252-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has a guarantor. Corin is vetted. Corin has an escrow account. Corin is overdrawn. Anouk is not vetted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is indebted and likewise is a depositor, so it has no collateral. No. 2 While the given borrower has an escrow account, so it has a mortgage. No. 3 While the given borrower has a lien, so it is underwritten. No. 4 While the given borrower has a lien and likewise is vetted and likewise has a guarantor, so it is indebted. No. 5 While the given borrower is indebted and likewise is overdrawn and likewise is vetted, so it has collateral. No. 6 While the given borrower has a guarantor, so it has a lien. Question: Is the claim \"Corin has collateral\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010252", "pair_id": "u010252-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010252-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "c693219272f64715", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010268-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has a postdoc. Capella has no field site. Gemma is resubmitted. Nashira is resubmitted. Gemma has seed funding. Kochab is not preregistered. Kochab has a field site. Gemma has a field site. Capella is not theoretical. Nashira is preregistered. Gemma is not cofunded. Gemma is renewed. Kochab has a postdoc. Gemma is theoretical. Kochab is not renewed. Gemma is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is shortlisted, so it is not a pilot study. No. 2 While the given proposal is cofunded, so it is shortlisted. No. 3 While the given proposal has a postdoc, so it has industry backing. No. 4 While the given proposal is theoretical and likewise is peer reviewed and likewise has a postdoc, so it has a patent filing. No. 5 While the given proposal is cofunded, so it is not shortlisted. No. 6 While the given proposal is preregistered, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 7 While the given proposal is peer reviewed, so it has no patent filing. No. 8 While the given proposal is embargoed and likewise has no field site and likewise is peer reviewed, so it is collaborative. No. 9 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is renewed, so it is embargoed. No. 10 While the given proposal is embargoed and likewise is shortlisted, so it is budgeted. No. 11 While the given proposal is embargoed and likewise is resubmitted, so it is a pilot study. No. 5 wins over No. 2. No. 1 wins over No. 11. No. 4 wins over No. 7. Question: Select what holds for Gemma: which option?", "options": ["is budgeted", "is a pilot study"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a pilot study", "unit_id": "u010268", "pair_id": "u010268-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010268-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ad585ae382230e9c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a3"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u010268-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has a postdoc. Capella has no field site. Gemma is resubmitted. Nashira is resubmitted. Gemma has seed funding. Kochab is not preregistered. Kochab has a field site. Gemma has a field site. Capella is not theoretical. Nashira is preregistered. Gemma is not cofunded. Gemma is renewed. Kochab has a postdoc. Gemma is theoretical. Kochab is not renewed. Gemma is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is shortlisted, so it is not a pilot study. No. 2 While the given proposal is cofunded, so it is shortlisted. No. 3 While the given proposal has a postdoc, so it has industry backing. No. 4 While the given proposal is theoretical and likewise is peer reviewed and likewise has a postdoc, so it has a patent filing. No. 5 While the given proposal is cofunded, so it is not shortlisted. No. 6 While the given proposal is preregistered, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 7 While the given proposal is peer reviewed, so it has no patent filing. No. 8 While the given proposal is embargoed and likewise has a field site and likewise is peer reviewed, so it is collaborative. No. 9 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is renewed, so it is embargoed. No. 10 While the given proposal is embargoed and likewise is shortlisted, so it is budgeted. No. 11 While the given proposal is embargoed and likewise is resubmitted, so it is a pilot study. No. 5 wins over No. 2. No. 1 wins over No. 11. No. 4 wins over No. 7. Question: Select what holds for Gemma: which option?", "options": ["is budgeted", "is a pilot study"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a pilot study", "unit_id": "u010268", "pair_id": "u010268-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010268-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fd8fbdb6d49d7e59", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a3"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u010290-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia has a postal zone of 74. Thilo has a parcel volume of 12. Saskia has a parcel volume of 63. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 7. Saskia is hazardous. Saskia is refrigerated. Rasmus is undeliverable. Rasmus is palletized. Saskia is not undeliverable. Rasmus is not refrigerated. Rasmus is not tracked. Rasmus is not fragile. Thilo is weighed. Rasmus is hazardous. Thilo is not scanned. Thilo is not refrigerated. Saskia is weighed. Rasmus has a postal zone of 73. Saskia is scanned. Saskia is not fragile. Saskia is palletized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is stamped and further has a delivery window of minimum 16, it thereby is labeled. Point B. If said parcel is fragile, it thereby is not consolidated. Point C. If said parcel is undeliverable, it thereby is not stamped. Point D. If said parcel is stamped and further is refrigerated and further has a postal zone of maximum 73, it thereby is consolidated. Point E. If said parcel is stamped and further is fragile, it thereby has a locker slot. Point F. If said parcel is stamped and further has a delivery window short of 16 and further is hazardous, it thereby is prepaid. Point G. If said parcel is stamped and further has a postal zone of minimum 37 and further is weighed, it thereby is sealed. Point H. If said parcel is scanned and further has a parcel volume of minimum 23, it thereby is damaged. Point I. If said parcel has a parcel volume short of 88 and further is palletized, it thereby is stamped. Point J. If said parcel is tracked, it thereby is not sealed. Point K. If said parcel is stamped and further is tracked, it thereby is misrouted. Point B supersedes Point D. Point J supersedes Point G. Point C supersedes Point I. Question: Which choice is true for Saskia?", "options": ["has a locker slot", "is misrouted", "is consolidated", "is labeled", "is prepaid", "is sealed"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is sealed", "unit_id": "u010290", "pair_id": "u010290-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010290-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d478067afabbb228", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a1", "a16", "a11", "a3", "a17", "a0"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u010290-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia has a postal zone of 33. Thilo has a parcel volume of 12. Saskia has a parcel volume of 63. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 7. Saskia is hazardous. Saskia is refrigerated. Rasmus is undeliverable. Rasmus is palletized. Saskia is not undeliverable. Rasmus is not refrigerated. Rasmus is not tracked. Rasmus is not fragile. Thilo is weighed. Rasmus is hazardous. Thilo is not scanned. Thilo is not refrigerated. Saskia is weighed. Rasmus has a postal zone of 73. Saskia is scanned. Saskia is not fragile. Saskia is palletized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is stamped and further has a delivery window of minimum 16, it thereby is labeled. Point B. If said parcel is fragile, it thereby is not consolidated. Point C. If said parcel is undeliverable, it thereby is not stamped. Point D. If said parcel is stamped and further is refrigerated and further has a postal zone of maximum 73, it thereby is consolidated. Point E. If said parcel is stamped and further is fragile, it thereby has a locker slot. Point F. If said parcel is stamped and further has a delivery window short of 16 and further is hazardous, it thereby is prepaid. Point G. If said parcel is stamped and further has a postal zone of minimum 37 and further is weighed, it thereby is sealed. Point H. If said parcel is scanned and further has a parcel volume of minimum 23, it thereby is damaged. Point I. If said parcel has a parcel volume short of 88 and further is palletized, it thereby is stamped. Point J. If said parcel is tracked, it thereby is not sealed. Point K. If said parcel is stamped and further is tracked, it thereby is misrouted. Point B supersedes Point D. Point J supersedes Point G. Point C supersedes Point I. Question: Which choice is true for Saskia?", "options": ["has a locker slot", "is misrouted", "is consolidated", "is labeled", "is prepaid", "is sealed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is consolidated", "unit_id": "u010290", "pair_id": "u010290-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010290-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9be965bc88520591", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a1", "a16", "a11", "a3", "a17", "a0"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u010295-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt has no firewall. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 9. Cobalt has a latency budget of 15. Cobalt is idle. Cobalt is not throttled. Cobalt has a replica count of 87. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 38. Cobalt is backed up.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is containerized while has a replica count at or above 87 while is mirrored, thus it has a GPU. Provision 2: when the workload here has a replica count at or above 46, thus it is containerized. Provision 3: when the workload here has a replica count beyond 48 while has a latency budget at or below 76 while is idle, thus it is sandboxed. Provision 4: when the workload here has a replica count at or above 42 while is backed up while has a firewall, thus it is mirrored. Provision 5: when the workload here is containerized while has a replica count beneath 87, thus it has no GPU. Provision 6: when the workload here is throttled while has a memory allotment beneath 72, thus it is not encrypted. Provision 6 has no effect when the workload here is cached. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here has a replica count at or below 46 while has a CPU quota at or above 51. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here has a latency budget beneath 58. Question: Would it be right to say that Cobalt has a GPU?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010295", "pair_id": "u010295-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010295-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b1631c8fe71083f6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u010295-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt has no firewall. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 9. Cobalt has a latency budget of 15. Cobalt is idle. Cobalt is not throttled. Cobalt has a replica count of 17. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 38. Cobalt is backed up.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is containerized while has a replica count at or above 87 while is mirrored, thus it has a GPU. Provision 2: when the workload here has a replica count at or above 46, thus it is containerized. Provision 3: when the workload here has a replica count beyond 48 while has a latency budget at or below 76 while is idle, thus it is sandboxed. Provision 4: when the workload here has a replica count at or above 42 while is backed up while has a firewall, thus it is mirrored. Provision 5: when the workload here is containerized while has a replica count beneath 87, thus it has no GPU. Provision 6: when the workload here is throttled while has a memory allotment beneath 72, thus it is not encrypted. Provision 6 has no effect when the workload here is cached. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here has a replica count at or below 46 while has a CPU quota at or above 51. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here has a latency budget beneath 58. Question: Would it be right to say that Cobalt has a GPU?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010295", "pair_id": "u010295-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010295-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1f4a1417ac012574", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u010295-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt has no firewall. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 9. Cobalt has a latency budget of 15. Cobalt is idle. Cobalt is not throttled. Cobalt has a replica count of 87. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 38. Cobalt is backed up.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is containerized and likewise has a replica count not below 87 and likewise is mirrored, so it has a GPU. No. 2 While the given workload has a replica count not below 46, so it is containerized. No. 3 While the given workload has a replica count that exceeds 48 and likewise has a latency budget not above 76 and likewise is idle, so it is sandboxed. No. 4 While the given workload has a replica count not below 42 and likewise is backed up and likewise has a firewall, so it is mirrored. No. 5 While the given workload is containerized and likewise has a replica count that falls below 87, so it has no GPU. No. 6 While the given workload is throttled and likewise has a memory allotment that falls below 72, so it is not encrypted. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given workload is cached. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload has a replica count not above 46 and likewise has a CPU quota not below 51. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload has a latency budget that falls below 58. Question: Is the claim \"Cobalt has a GPU\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010295", "pair_id": "u010295-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010295-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b1631c8fe71083f6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u010295-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt has no firewall. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 9. Cobalt has a latency budget of 15. Cobalt is idle. Cobalt is not throttled. Cobalt has a replica count of 17. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 38. Cobalt is backed up.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is containerized and likewise has a replica count not below 87 and likewise is mirrored, so it has a GPU. No. 2 While the given workload has a replica count not below 46, so it is containerized. No. 3 While the given workload has a replica count that exceeds 48 and likewise has a latency budget not above 76 and likewise is idle, so it is sandboxed. No. 4 While the given workload has a replica count not below 42 and likewise is backed up and likewise has a firewall, so it is mirrored. No. 5 While the given workload is containerized and likewise has a replica count that falls below 87, so it has no GPU. No. 6 While the given workload is throttled and likewise has a memory allotment that falls below 72, so it is not encrypted. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given workload is cached. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload has a replica count not above 46 and likewise has a CPU quota not below 51. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload has a latency budget that falls below 58. Question: Is the claim \"Cobalt has a GPU\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010295", "pair_id": "u010295-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010295-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1f4a1417ac012574", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u010319-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is symptomatic. Vilja is not contagious. Vilja has a mobility rank of 48. Vilja is ambulatory. Vilja is not pregnant. Vilja has no chaperone.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is waitlisted and likewise has a mobility rank not above 56, so it is not bedridden. No. 2 While the given patient is waitlisted and likewise has a mobility rank that exceeds 56, so it is bedridden. No. 3 While the given patient is not contagious and likewise is symptomatic, so it has a caregiver. No. 4 While the given patient is discharged, so it is waitlisted. No. 5 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is discharged. No. 6 While the given patient is not discharged and likewise has a chaperone, so it is referred. No. 7 While the given patient is waitlisted and likewise is ambulatory and likewise has a mobility rank not below 58, so it is asthmatic. Question: Is the claim \"Vilja is bedridden\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010319", "pair_id": "u010319-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010319-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "85f372d858a30cb4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 17}}
{"id": "syn-u010319-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is symptomatic. Vilja is not contagious. Vilja has a mobility rank of 48. Vilja is ambulatory. Vilja is not pregnant. Vilja has no chaperone.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is waitlisted and likewise has a mobility rank not above 56, so it is not bedridden. No. 2 While the given patient is waitlisted and likewise has a mobility rank that exceeds 56, so it is bedridden. No. 3 While the given patient is contagious and likewise is symptomatic, so it has a caregiver. No. 4 While the given patient is discharged, so it is waitlisted. No. 5 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is discharged. No. 6 While the given patient is not discharged and likewise has a chaperone, so it is referred. No. 7 While the given patient is waitlisted and likewise is ambulatory and likewise has a mobility rank not below 58, so it is asthmatic. Question: Is the claim \"Vilja is bedridden\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010319", "pair_id": "u010319-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010319-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "6cba6f3afd71aed0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 17}}
{"id": "syn-u010345-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not unionized. Petra has a seniority step of 58. Petra is not interviewed. Petra is not a graduate. Mads is unionized. Mads is a graduate.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is unionized, it thereby has a visa. Point B. If said candidate has a seniority step of minimum 47, it thereby is recommended. Question: Statement: Petra is a graduate. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010345", "pair_id": "u010345-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010345-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "69b89052319a1ee0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010345-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not unionized. Petra has a seniority step of 58. Petra is not interviewed. Petra is a graduate. Mads is unionized. Mads is a graduate.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is unionized, it thereby has a visa. Point B. If said candidate has a seniority step of minimum 47, it thereby is recommended. Question: Statement: Petra is a graduate. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010345", "pair_id": "u010345-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010345-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "5e780c40b8e8640d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010353-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk is not audited. Anouk is not foreclosed. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk has a lien.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has a guarantor, thus it is not indebted. Provision 2: when the borrower here is audited, thus it is not solvent. Provision 3: when the borrower here is solvent while is not audited, thus it is indebted. Provision 4: when the borrower here is indebted while has a lien while is not foreclosed, thus it is delinquent. Provision 5: when the borrower here is indebted while has a lien, thus it is not delinquent. Provision 6: when the borrower here has no escrow account while is not foreclosed, thus it is not creditworthy. Provision 7: when the borrower here is audited, thus it is creditworthy. Provision 8: when the borrower here is not audited while has no lien while is not foreclosed, thus it has a guarantor. Provision 9: when the borrower here is not audited, thus it is solvent. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Anouk is not delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010353", "pair_id": "u010353-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010353-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "aa85a251f4666f8b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u010353-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk is not audited. Anouk is not foreclosed. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk has a lien.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has a guarantor, thus it is not indebted. Provision 2: when the borrower here is audited, thus it is not solvent. Provision 3: when the borrower here is solvent while is not audited, thus it is indebted. Provision 4: when the borrower here is indebted while has a lien while is not foreclosed, thus it is delinquent. Provision 5: when the borrower here is indebted while has no lien, thus it is not delinquent. Provision 6: when the borrower here has no escrow account while is not foreclosed, thus it is not creditworthy. Provision 7: when the borrower here is audited, thus it is creditworthy. Provision 8: when the borrower here is not audited while has no lien while is not foreclosed, thus it has a guarantor. Provision 9: when the borrower here is not audited, thus it is solvent. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Anouk is not delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010353", "pair_id": "u010353-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010353-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "caf02a2acab50f89", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u010353-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk is not audited. Anouk is not foreclosed. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk has a lien.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has a guarantor, so it is not indebted. No. 2 While the given borrower is audited, so it is not solvent. No. 3 While the given borrower is solvent and likewise is not audited, so it is indebted. No. 4 While the given borrower is indebted and likewise has a lien and likewise is not foreclosed, so it is delinquent. No. 5 While the given borrower is indebted and likewise has a lien, so it is not delinquent. No. 6 While the given borrower has no escrow account and likewise is not foreclosed, so it is not creditworthy. No. 7 While the given borrower is audited, so it is creditworthy. No. 8 While the given borrower is not audited and likewise has no lien and likewise is not foreclosed, so it has a guarantor. No. 9 While the given borrower is not audited, so it is solvent. No. 2 wins over No. 9. No. 6 wins over No. 7. No. 5 wins over No. 4. No. 3 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Anouk is not delinquent\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010353", "pair_id": "u010353-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010353-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "aa85a251f4666f8b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u010353-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk is not audited. Anouk is not foreclosed. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk has a lien.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has a guarantor, so it is not indebted. No. 2 While the given borrower is audited, so it is not solvent. No. 3 While the given borrower is solvent and likewise is not audited, so it is indebted. No. 4 While the given borrower is indebted and likewise has a lien and likewise is not foreclosed, so it is delinquent. No. 5 While the given borrower is indebted and likewise has no lien, so it is not delinquent. No. 6 While the given borrower has no escrow account and likewise is not foreclosed, so it is not creditworthy. No. 7 While the given borrower is audited, so it is creditworthy. No. 8 While the given borrower is not audited and likewise has no lien and likewise is not foreclosed, so it has a guarantor. No. 9 While the given borrower is not audited, so it is solvent. No. 2 wins over No. 9. No. 6 wins over No. 7. No. 5 wins over No. 4. No. 3 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Anouk is not delinquent\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010353", "pair_id": "u010353-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010353-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "caf02a2acab50f89", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u010366-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has a lint backlog of 69. Quartz has a patch cycle of 21. Quartz is not linted. Basalt is not linted. Quartz has a lint backlog of 41. Basalt is not benchmarked. Basalt is not compiled. Basalt has a patch cycle of 77. Quartz is not reverted. Quartz is not benchmarked.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is compiled plus is linted: then it has a security advisory. Policy II. Suppose that build is benchmarked: then it is notarized. Policy III. Suppose that build is notarized plus has a patch cycle higher than 87 plus has a lint backlog no higher than 60: then it is documented. Policy IV. Suppose that build is notarized plus has a patch cycle no higher than 87 plus is benchmarked: then it is not documented. Policy V. Suppose that build is documented: then it is versioned. Policy VI. Suppose that build is benchmarked plus is not reverted: then it is obsolete. Question: Is it so that Basalt is documented?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010366", "pair_id": "u010366-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010366-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "c725a9de5b61c95d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u010366-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has a lint backlog of 69. Quartz has a patch cycle of 21. Quartz is not linted. Basalt is not linted. Quartz has a lint backlog of 41. Basalt is not benchmarked. Basalt is not compiled. Basalt has a patch cycle of 77. Quartz is reverted. Quartz is not benchmarked.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is compiled plus is linted: then it has a security advisory. Policy II. Suppose that build is benchmarked: then it is notarized. Policy III. Suppose that build is notarized plus has a patch cycle higher than 87 plus has a lint backlog no higher than 60: then it is documented. Policy IV. Suppose that build is notarized plus has a patch cycle no higher than 87 plus is benchmarked: then it is not documented. Policy V. Suppose that build is documented: then it is versioned. Policy VI. Suppose that build is benchmarked plus is not reverted: then it is obsolete. Question: Is it so that Basalt is documented?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010366", "pair_id": "u010366-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010366-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1b61ffea1cb63749", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u010427-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse has a steering committee. Hadar has no postdoc. Betelgeuse is not theoretical. Izar has no postdoc. Betelgeuse has no seed funding. Izar is cofunded. Betelgeuse is endorsed. Izar is collaborative. Aldebaran is not shortlisted. Hadar is not translational. Izar is not interdisciplinary. Izar has no seed funding. Betelgeuse is budgeted. Betelgeuse is embargoed. Aldebaran has a field site. Izar has no steering committee. Hadar has seed funding. Hadar has a steering committee. Hadar is collaborative. Hadar is interdisciplinary. Aldebaran is not cofunded. Aldebaran has a postdoc. Hadar is budgeted. Betelgeuse is translational. Aldebaran has a steering committee. Hadar has a field site. Hadar is endorsed. Hadar is shortlisted. Aldebaran is exploratory. Hadar is theoretical. Betelgeuse has no postdoc.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is resubmitted, and is cofunded, that proposal is multicenter. Item B. When the proposal is budgeted, and has seed funding, and is interdisciplinary, that proposal has industry backing. Item C. When the proposal is resubmitted, and is shortlisted, that proposal has ethics clearance. Item D. When the proposal is budgeted, and is endorsed, that proposal is resubmitted. Item E. When the proposal is resubmitted, and is exploratory, that proposal is a pilot study. Item F. When the proposal is resubmitted, and has a steering committee, and is embargoed, that proposal is longitudinal. Item G. When the proposal has a steering committee, and is collaborative, that proposal is renewed. Item H. When the proposal is resubmitted, and is theoretical, that proposal has a patent filing. Item I. When the proposal is resubmitted, and is embargoed, and is translational, that proposal is peer reviewed. Item J. When the proposal is resubmitted, and has a postdoc, and is theoretical, that proposal is preregistered. Item G is suspended when the proposal is budgeted. Item H is suspended when the proposal has a postdoc. Item J is suspended when the proposal has a steering committee. Item H is suspended when the proposal is shortlisted. Item I is suspended when the proposal is cofunded. Item J is suspended when the proposal has a field site. Item I is suspended when the proposal is collaborative. Question: What applies to Hadar?", "options": ["is multicenter", "has ethics clearance", "is longitudinal", "is peer reviewed", "is preregistered", "is a pilot study", "has a patent filing"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has ethics clearance", "unit_id": "u010427", "pair_id": "u010427-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/16/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010427-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "855285fa86ca27fd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a5", "a9", "a23", "a16", "a7", "a2", "a21"]}, "attempt": 38}}
{"id": "syn-u010427-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse has a steering committee. Hadar has no postdoc. Betelgeuse is not theoretical. Izar has no postdoc. Betelgeuse has no seed funding. Izar is cofunded. Betelgeuse is endorsed. Izar is collaborative. Aldebaran is not shortlisted. Hadar is not translational. Izar is not interdisciplinary. Izar has no seed funding. Betelgeuse is budgeted. Betelgeuse is embargoed. Aldebaran has a field site. Izar has no steering committee. Hadar has no seed funding. Hadar has a steering committee. Hadar is collaborative. Hadar is interdisciplinary. Aldebaran is not cofunded. Aldebaran has a postdoc. Hadar is budgeted. Betelgeuse is translational. Aldebaran has a steering committee. Hadar has a field site. Hadar is endorsed. Hadar is shortlisted. Aldebaran is exploratory. Hadar is theoretical. Betelgeuse has no postdoc.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is resubmitted, and is cofunded, that proposal is multicenter. Item B. When the proposal is budgeted, and has seed funding, and is interdisciplinary, that proposal has industry backing. Item C. When the proposal is resubmitted, and is shortlisted, that proposal has ethics clearance. Item D. When the proposal is budgeted, and is endorsed, that proposal is resubmitted. Item E. When the proposal is resubmitted, and is exploratory, that proposal is a pilot study. Item F. When the proposal is resubmitted, and has a steering committee, and is embargoed, that proposal is longitudinal. Item G. When the proposal has a steering committee, and is collaborative, that proposal is renewed. Item H. When the proposal is resubmitted, and is theoretical, that proposal has a patent filing. Item I. When the proposal is resubmitted, and is embargoed, and is translational, that proposal is peer reviewed. Item J. When the proposal is resubmitted, and has a postdoc, and is theoretical, that proposal is preregistered. Item G is suspended when the proposal is budgeted. Item H is suspended when the proposal has a postdoc. Item J is suspended when the proposal has a steering committee. Item H is suspended when the proposal is shortlisted. Item I is suspended when the proposal is cofunded. Item J is suspended when the proposal has a field site. Item I is suspended when the proposal is collaborative. Question: What applies to Hadar?", "options": ["is multicenter", "has ethics clearance", "is longitudinal", "is peer reviewed", "is preregistered", "is a pilot study", "has a patent filing"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has ethics clearance", "unit_id": "u010427", "pair_id": "u010427-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/16/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010427-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "55da23bb568fae4a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a5", "a9", "a23", "a16", "a7", "a2", "a21"]}, "attempt": 38}}
{"id": "syn-u010534-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk is not audited. Greta is garnished. Greta is not creditworthy. Anouk is prequalified. Anouk is not creditworthy. Greta has no escrow account. Greta is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is not vetted. #2 Each time a borrower is indebted, it then has a guarantor. #3 Each time a borrower is creditworthy, it then has no cosigner. #4 Each time a borrower is a homeowner, it then is not amortized. #5 Each time a borrower is a homeowner, it then is not bankrupt. #6 Each time a borrower is vetted, it then has no guarantor. #7 Each time a borrower is prequalified, it then is refinanced. #8 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then is vetted. #9 Each time a borrower is refinanced, it then is not indebted. #10 Each time a borrower has a cosigner, it then is indebted. #11 Each time a borrower is audited, it then is amortized. #12 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then has a cosigner. #13 Each time a borrower is garnished, it then is bankrupt. #8 yields to #1. #2 yields to #6. #10 yields to #9. #13 yields to #5. #12 yields to #3. #4 yields to #11. Question: Do the terms above show that Greta has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010534", "pair_id": "u010534-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010534-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "8292b75bb3dbf2d4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010534-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk is not audited. Greta is garnished. Greta is prequalified. Greta is not creditworthy. Anouk is prequalified. Anouk is not creditworthy. Greta has no escrow account. Greta is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is not vetted. #2 Each time a borrower is indebted, it then has a guarantor. #3 Each time a borrower is creditworthy, it then has no cosigner. #4 Each time a borrower is a homeowner, it then is not amortized. #5 Each time a borrower is a homeowner, it then is not bankrupt. #6 Each time a borrower is vetted, it then has no guarantor. #7 Each time a borrower is prequalified, it then is refinanced. #8 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then is vetted. #9 Each time a borrower is refinanced, it then is not indebted. #10 Each time a borrower has a cosigner, it then is indebted. #11 Each time a borrower is audited, it then is amortized. #12 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then has a cosigner. #13 Each time a borrower is garnished, it then is bankrupt. #8 yields to #1. #2 yields to #6. #10 yields to #9. #13 yields to #5. #12 yields to #3. #4 yields to #11. Question: Do the terms above show that Greta has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010534", "pair_id": "u010534-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010534-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "e33072f02c3b9f22", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010586-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar is fuzzed. Galena has a lint backlog of 90. Obsidian is backported. Galena is not fuzzed. Obsidian is linted. Galena is backported. Galena is benchmarked. Galena has a test yield of 53. Galena has a patch cycle of 13. Galena has a defect tally of 17. Obsidian has a lint backlog of 8. Galena is linted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a lint backlog that exceeds 67 and likewise has a patch cycle that falls below 58, so it is versioned. No. 2 While the given build is linted, so it has a migration script. No. 3 While the given build is benchmarked and likewise is fuzzed and likewise is backported, so it is minified. No. 4 While the given build has a migration script and likewise has a lint backlog that falls below 89 and likewise is backported, so it is reproducible. No. 5 While the given build has a migration script and likewise has a lint backlog not below 89 and likewise has a defect tally that exceeds 80, so it is not reproducible. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given build has a patch cycle not below 72 and likewise is fuzzed. Question: Is the claim \"Galena is reproducible\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010586", "pair_id": "u010586-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010586-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c5e2c2a296f5f245", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010586-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar is fuzzed. Galena has a lint backlog of 14. Obsidian is backported. Galena is not fuzzed. Obsidian is linted. Galena is backported. Galena is benchmarked. Galena has a test yield of 53. Galena has a patch cycle of 13. Galena has a defect tally of 17. Obsidian has a lint backlog of 8. Galena is linted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a lint backlog that exceeds 67 and likewise has a patch cycle that falls below 58, so it is versioned. No. 2 While the given build is linted, so it has a migration script. No. 3 While the given build is benchmarked and likewise is fuzzed and likewise is backported, so it is minified. No. 4 While the given build has a migration script and likewise has a lint backlog that falls below 89 and likewise is backported, so it is reproducible. No. 5 While the given build has a migration script and likewise has a lint backlog not below 89 and likewise has a defect tally that exceeds 80, so it is not reproducible. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given build has a patch cycle not below 72 and likewise is fuzzed. Question: Is the claim \"Galena is reproducible\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010586", "pair_id": "u010586-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010586-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3adfc578164a0fba", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010638-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is perishable. Quentin is scanned. Quentin is not tracked. Quentin has a locker slot. Quentin is hazardous. Quentin is stamped. Quentin is prepaid.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is undeliverable provided that it is consolidated as well as is not tracked as well as is not misrouted. Section 2: a parcel is palletized provided that it is consolidated as well as is not hazardous. Section 3: a parcel has a courier provided that it is consolidated as well as has a locker slot as well as is weighed. Section 4: a parcel has a waybill provided that it is consolidated as well as is tracked as well as is scanned. Section 5: a parcel is labeled provided that it is consolidated as well as is stamped. Section 6: a parcel is consolidated provided that it is perishable. Section 7: a parcel is weighed provided that it is not rerouted as well as is not prepaid. Section 8: a parcel is sealed provided that it is hazardous. Section 9: a parcel is not sealed provided that it is fragile. Section 10: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is consolidated as well as is hazardous as well as has a locker slot. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 8. Question: Which statement fits Quentin?", "options": ["is palletized", "has a barcode", "is undeliverable", "has a courier", "has a waybill"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a barcode", "unit_id": "u010638", "pair_id": "u010638-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010638-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3a8a45c957c4b3c3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a15", "a1", "a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010638-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is perishable. Quentin is scanned. Quentin is not tracked. Quentin has a locker slot. Quentin is hazardous. Quentin is not stamped. Quentin is prepaid.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is undeliverable provided that it is consolidated as well as is not tracked as well as is not misrouted. Section 2: a parcel is palletized provided that it is consolidated as well as is not hazardous. Section 3: a parcel has a courier provided that it is consolidated as well as has a locker slot as well as is weighed. Section 4: a parcel has a waybill provided that it is consolidated as well as is tracked as well as is scanned. Section 5: a parcel is labeled provided that it is consolidated as well as is stamped. Section 6: a parcel is consolidated provided that it is perishable. Section 7: a parcel is weighed provided that it is not rerouted as well as is not prepaid. Section 8: a parcel is sealed provided that it is hazardous. Section 9: a parcel is not sealed provided that it is fragile. Section 10: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is consolidated as well as is hazardous as well as has a locker slot. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 8. Question: Which statement fits Quentin?", "options": ["is palletized", "has a barcode", "is undeliverable", "has a courier", "has a waybill"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a barcode", "unit_id": "u010638", "pair_id": "u010638-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010638-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c3a34d567d153df9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a15", "a1", "a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010638-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is perishable. Quentin is scanned. Quentin is not tracked. Quentin has a locker slot. Quentin is hazardous. Quentin is stamped. Quentin is prepaid.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is consolidated and additionally is not tracked and additionally is not misrouted, it then is undeliverable. #2 Each time a parcel is consolidated and additionally is not hazardous, it then is palletized. #3 Each time a parcel is consolidated and additionally has a locker slot and additionally is weighed, it then has a courier. #4 Each time a parcel is consolidated and additionally is tracked and additionally is scanned, it then has a waybill. #5 Each time a parcel is consolidated and additionally is stamped, it then is labeled. #6 Each time a parcel is perishable, it then is consolidated. #7 Each time a parcel is not rerouted and additionally is not prepaid, it then is weighed. #8 Each time a parcel is hazardous, it then is sealed. #9 Each time a parcel is fragile, it then is not sealed. #10 Each time a parcel is consolidated and additionally is hazardous and additionally has a locker slot, it then has a barcode. #8 yields to #9. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Quentin?", "options": ["is palletized", "has a barcode", "is undeliverable", "has a courier", "has a waybill"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a barcode", "unit_id": "u010638", "pair_id": "u010638-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010638-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3a8a45c957c4b3c3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a15", "a1", "a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010638-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is perishable. Quentin is scanned. Quentin is not tracked. Quentin has a locker slot. Quentin is hazardous. Quentin is not stamped. Quentin is prepaid.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is consolidated and additionally is not tracked and additionally is not misrouted, it then is undeliverable. #2 Each time a parcel is consolidated and additionally is not hazardous, it then is palletized. #3 Each time a parcel is consolidated and additionally has a locker slot and additionally is weighed, it then has a courier. #4 Each time a parcel is consolidated and additionally is tracked and additionally is scanned, it then has a waybill. #5 Each time a parcel is consolidated and additionally is stamped, it then is labeled. #6 Each time a parcel is perishable, it then is consolidated. #7 Each time a parcel is not rerouted and additionally is not prepaid, it then is weighed. #8 Each time a parcel is hazardous, it then is sealed. #9 Each time a parcel is fragile, it then is not sealed. #10 Each time a parcel is consolidated and additionally is hazardous and additionally has a locker slot, it then has a barcode. #8 yields to #9. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Quentin?", "options": ["is palletized", "has a barcode", "is undeliverable", "has a courier", "has a waybill"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a barcode", "unit_id": "u010638", "pair_id": "u010638-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010638-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c3a34d567d153df9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a15", "a1", "a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010640-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is not interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut is not preregistered. Fomalhaut is not renewed. Fomalhaut has no industry backing. Fomalhaut is resubmitted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is resubmitted, it also is multicenter. Clause 2: once any proposal is preregistered, it also has ethics clearance. Clause 3: once any proposal is budgeted and also has industry backing and also is interdisciplinary, it also is not longitudinal. Clause 4: once any proposal is multicenter and also is resubmitted, it also is budgeted. Clause 5: once any proposal is renewed and also is interdisciplinary, it also is not a pilot study. Clause 6: once any proposal is budgeted and also is resubmitted and also is not renewed, it also is longitudinal. Question: Does it follow that Fomalhaut is not longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010640", "pair_id": "u010640-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010640-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "7b24ec8237f7c388", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u010640-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is not interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut is not preregistered. Fomalhaut is not renewed. Fomalhaut has no industry backing. Fomalhaut is resubmitted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is resubmitted, it also is multicenter. Clause 2: once any proposal is preregistered, it also has ethics clearance. Clause 3: once any proposal is budgeted and also has industry backing and also is interdisciplinary, it also is not longitudinal. Clause 4: once any proposal is multicenter and also is resubmitted, it also is budgeted. Clause 5: once any proposal is renewed and also is interdisciplinary, it also is not a pilot study. Clause 6: once any proposal is budgeted and also is resubmitted and also is renewed, it also is longitudinal. Question: Does it follow that Fomalhaut is not longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010640", "pair_id": "u010640-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010640-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "3c8416f7892f8920", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u010699-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse is not shortlisted. Nashira is not cofunded. Nashira is not interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is preregistered, thus it has a postdoc. Provision 2: when the proposal here is longitudinal, thus it has no postdoc. Provision 3: when the proposal here is interdisciplinary, thus it is preregistered. Provision 4: when the proposal here is shortlisted, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 5: when the proposal here is not cofunded, thus it is endorsed. Question: Would it be right to say that Nashira has a postdoc?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010699", "pair_id": "u010699-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010699-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "e75a9592de9740ab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010699-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse is not shortlisted. Nashira is shortlisted. Nashira is not cofunded. Nashira is not interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is preregistered, thus it has a postdoc. Provision 2: when the proposal here is longitudinal, thus it has no postdoc. Provision 3: when the proposal here is interdisciplinary, thus it is preregistered. Provision 4: when the proposal here is shortlisted, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 5: when the proposal here is not cofunded, thus it is endorsed. Question: Would it be right to say that Nashira has a postdoc?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010699", "pair_id": "u010699-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010699-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "74077a8d615c082d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010699-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse is not shortlisted. Nashira is not cofunded. Nashira is not interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is preregistered, so it has a postdoc. No. 2 While the given proposal is longitudinal, so it has no postdoc. No. 3 While the given proposal is interdisciplinary, so it is preregistered. No. 4 While the given proposal is shortlisted, so it is longitudinal. No. 5 While the given proposal is not cofunded, so it is endorsed. Question: Is the claim \"Nashira has a postdoc\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010699", "pair_id": "u010699-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010699-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "e75a9592de9740ab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010699-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse is not shortlisted. Nashira is shortlisted. Nashira is not cofunded. Nashira is not interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is preregistered, so it has a postdoc. No. 2 While the given proposal is longitudinal, so it has no postdoc. No. 3 While the given proposal is interdisciplinary, so it is preregistered. No. 4 While the given proposal is shortlisted, so it is longitudinal. No. 5 While the given proposal is not cofunded, so it is endorsed. Question: Is the claim \"Nashira has a postdoc\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010699", "pair_id": "u010699-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010699-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "74077a8d615c082d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010708-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus is not damaged. Thilo has a parcel volume of 45. Nandor is not consolidated. Thilo is not stamped. Nandor is not misrouted. Thilo is misrouted. Thilo is not rerouted. Jory is rerouted. Nandor is damaged. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 60. Thilo has a postal zone of 55. Nandor is not rerouted. Thilo has no barcode.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is damaged: then it is oversized. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a waybill plus is misrouted: then it is not undeliverable. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is not undeliverable plus has a parcel volume no lower than 45: then it is tracked. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has no barcode plus is stamped: then it has a courier. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is not undeliverable plus has a parcel volume smaller than 45: then it is sealed. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is not undeliverable plus is rerouted plus is not consolidated: then it is labeled. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel has a postal zone higher than 32: then it has a waybill. Policy I is waived if that parcel is rerouted. Policy IV is waived if that parcel is rerouted. Question: Which choice is right for Thilo?", "options": ["is tracked", "is labeled", "is sealed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u010708", "pair_id": "u010708-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010708-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f18a036b67d919d2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a5", "a8"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010708-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus is not damaged. Thilo has a parcel volume of 27. Nandor is not consolidated. Thilo is not stamped. Nandor is not misrouted. Thilo is misrouted. Thilo is not rerouted. Jory is rerouted. Nandor is damaged. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 60. Thilo has a postal zone of 55. Nandor is not rerouted. Thilo has no barcode.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is damaged: then it is oversized. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a waybill plus is misrouted: then it is not undeliverable. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is not undeliverable plus has a parcel volume no lower than 45: then it is tracked. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has no barcode plus is stamped: then it has a courier. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is not undeliverable plus has a parcel volume smaller than 45: then it is sealed. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is not undeliverable plus is rerouted plus is not consolidated: then it is labeled. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel has a postal zone higher than 32: then it has a waybill. Policy I is waived if that parcel is rerouted. Policy IV is waived if that parcel is rerouted. Question: Which choice is right for Thilo?", "options": ["is tracked", "is labeled", "is sealed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is sealed", "unit_id": "u010708", "pair_id": "u010708-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010708-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a9eda3c56929a144", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a5", "a8"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010784-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is onboarded. Lotte has a signing bonus. Kalle is not probationary. Lotte is probationary. Lotte is unionized. Hedda has a signing bonus. Hedda is not bilingual. Lotte is not bilingual. Lotte is freelance. Kalle is not freelance.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is interviewed and additionally is onboarded, it then is a veteran. #2 Each time a candidate is a veteran and additionally has no signing bonus, it then has no visa. #3 Each time a candidate is a veteran and additionally has a signing bonus and additionally is freelance, it then has a visa. #4 Each time a candidate is probationary, it then is interviewed. #5 Each time a candidate is bilingual, it then has a mentor. #4 is set aside if a candidate is not probationary and additionally is unionized. #2 is set aside if a candidate is unionized and additionally is not probationary. #2 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Lotte has a visa?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010784", "pair_id": "u010784-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010784-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "01c85df5d2ade4a7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u010784-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is onboarded. Lotte has a signing bonus. Kalle is not probationary. Lotte is probationary. Lotte is unionized. Hedda has a signing bonus. Hedda is not bilingual. Lotte is bilingual. Lotte is freelance. Kalle is not freelance.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is interviewed and additionally is onboarded, it then is a veteran. #2 Each time a candidate is a veteran and additionally has no signing bonus, it then has no visa. #3 Each time a candidate is a veteran and additionally has a signing bonus and additionally is freelance, it then has a visa. #4 Each time a candidate is probationary, it then is interviewed. #5 Each time a candidate is bilingual, it then has a mentor. #4 is set aside if a candidate is not probationary and additionally is unionized. #2 is set aside if a candidate is unionized and additionally is not probationary. #2 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Lotte has a visa?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u010784", "pair_id": "u010784-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010784-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a7bce5655fc73121", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u010798-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not admitted. Xenia is fasting. Yusuf is not waitlisted. Xenia is not waitlisted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has a caregiver provided that it is not admitted. Section 2: a patient is contagious provided that it is fasting. Section 3: a patient is not contagious provided that it is waitlisted. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Xenia is not contagious. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010798", "pair_id": "u010798-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010798-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "aa0a0d623752df90", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010798-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not admitted. Xenia is fasting. Yusuf is not waitlisted. Xenia is not waitlisted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has a caregiver provided that it is admitted. Section 2: a patient is contagious provided that it is fasting. Section 3: a patient is not contagious provided that it is waitlisted. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Xenia is not contagious. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010798", "pair_id": "u010798-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010798-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "cefbb1457340430c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010798-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not admitted. Xenia is fasting. Yusuf is not waitlisted. Xenia is not waitlisted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is not admitted, it then has a caregiver. #2 Each time a patient is fasting, it then is contagious. #3 Each time a patient is waitlisted, it then is not contagious. #2 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Xenia is not contagious?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010798", "pair_id": "u010798-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010798-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "aa0a0d623752df90", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010798-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not admitted. Xenia is fasting. Yusuf is not waitlisted. Xenia is not waitlisted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is admitted, it then has a caregiver. #2 Each time a patient is fasting, it then is contagious. #3 Each time a patient is waitlisted, it then is not contagious. #2 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Xenia is not contagious?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u010798", "pair_id": "u010798-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010798-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "cefbb1457340430c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010816-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fabian is not indemnified. Bruno is not inspected. Fabian has no flood coverage. Bruno is a claimant. Fabian has a rider. Fabian is a claimant. Bruno has a rider. Fabian has no premium discount. Fabian is not inspected. Bruno is indemnified.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a rider, that policyholder has a dashcam. Item B. When the policyholder is inspected, that policyholder is not uninsurable. Item C. When the policyholder has a premium discount, that policyholder is not covered. Item D. When the policyholder is litigated, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item E. When the policyholder has flood coverage, that policyholder is not litigated. Item F. When the policyholder is not indemnified, that policyholder is litigated. Item G. When the policyholder is reimbursed, that policyholder is bundled. Item H. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, that policyholder is not reinstated. Item I. When the policyholder has a dashcam, that policyholder is reinstated. Item J. When the policyholder has a premium discount, that policyholder is not reimbursed. Item K. When the policyholder is litigated, that policyholder has no beneficiary. Item L. When the policyholder is reinstated, that policyholder has a beneficiary. Item M. When the policyholder is indemnified, that policyholder is uninsurable. Item N. When the policyholder is a claimant, that policyholder is covered. Item O. When the policyholder has a premium discount, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item B is suspended when the policyholder is indemnified. Item M outranks Item B. Item D outranks Item J. Item K outranks Item L. Item E outranks Item F. Item N outranks Item C. Item H outranks Item I. Question: What applies to Fabian?", "options": ["is bundled", "has a beneficiary"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is bundled", "unit_id": "u010816", "pair_id": "u010816-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010816-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "50658fcbc1aeabf8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010816-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fabian is not indemnified. Bruno is not inspected. Fabian has no flood coverage. Bruno is a claimant. Fabian has a rider. Fabian is a claimant. Bruno has a rider. Fabian has no premium discount. Fabian is not inspected. Bruno is indemnified.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a rider, that policyholder has a dashcam. Item B. When the policyholder is inspected, that policyholder is not uninsurable. Item C. When the policyholder has a premium discount, that policyholder is not covered. Item D. When the policyholder is litigated, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item E. When the policyholder has flood coverage, that policyholder is not litigated. Item F. When the policyholder is indemnified, that policyholder is litigated. Item G. When the policyholder is reimbursed, that policyholder is bundled. Item H. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, that policyholder is not reinstated. Item I. When the policyholder has a dashcam, that policyholder is reinstated. Item J. When the policyholder has a premium discount, that policyholder is not reimbursed. Item K. When the policyholder is litigated, that policyholder has no beneficiary. Item L. When the policyholder is reinstated, that policyholder has a beneficiary. Item M. When the policyholder is indemnified, that policyholder is uninsurable. Item N. When the policyholder is a claimant, that policyholder is covered. Item O. When the policyholder has a premium discount, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item B is suspended when the policyholder is indemnified. Item M outranks Item B. Item D outranks Item J. Item K outranks Item L. Item E outranks Item F. Item N outranks Item C. Item H outranks Item I. Question: What applies to Fabian?", "options": ["is bundled", "has a beneficiary"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a beneficiary", "unit_id": "u010816", "pair_id": "u010816-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010816-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "642e7e8f3b9aee24", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010820-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirela is tracked. Mirela has a delivery window of 18. Mirela is palletized. Mirela is misrouted. Jory is not misrouted. Rasmus is not tracked. Thilo is not fragile. Jory is fragile. Rasmus has a weight class of 5. Mirela is fragile. Thilo is palletized. Mirela has a parcel volume of 8. Thilo is tracked. Rasmus is palletized. Rasmus is fragile. Rasmus has a postal zone of 85. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 23. Jory is not delayed. Thilo has a postal zone of 54. Rasmus has a delivery window of 49. Thilo has a parcel volume of 95. Mirela has a postal zone of 22. Thilo is delayed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is registered plus has a postal zone smaller than 56: then it is consolidated. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is registered plus has a postal zone no lower than 56 plus is fragile: then it is refrigerated. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window no lower than 29: then it is stamped. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is registered: then it is not oversized. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is delayed plus is palletized: then it is damaged. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume smaller than 65 plus is tracked plus is misrouted: then it is registered. Policy V is waived if that parcel has a postal zone no lower than 22. Policy III is waived if that parcel has a weight class no lower than 60. Policy I is waived if that parcel has a weight class higher than 86. Question: Which choice is right for Mirela?", "options": ["is consolidated", "is refrigerated"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is consolidated", "unit_id": "u010820", "pair_id": "u010820-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/21/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010820-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7d54dc00095c8ad9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a6", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010820-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirela is tracked. Mirela has a delivery window of 18. Mirela is palletized. Mirela is misrouted. Jory is not misrouted. Rasmus is not tracked. Thilo is not fragile. Jory is fragile. Rasmus has a weight class of 5. Mirela is fragile. Thilo is palletized. Mirela has a parcel volume of 8. Thilo is tracked. Rasmus is palletized. Rasmus is fragile. Rasmus has a postal zone of 85. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 23. Jory is not delayed. Thilo has a postal zone of 54. Rasmus has a delivery window of 49. Thilo has a parcel volume of 95. Mirela has a postal zone of 62. Thilo is delayed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is registered plus has a postal zone smaller than 56: then it is consolidated. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is registered plus has a postal zone no lower than 56 plus is fragile: then it is refrigerated. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window no lower than 29: then it is stamped. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is registered: then it is not oversized. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is delayed plus is palletized: then it is damaged. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume smaller than 65 plus is tracked plus is misrouted: then it is registered. Policy V is waived if that parcel has a postal zone no lower than 22. Policy III is waived if that parcel has a weight class no lower than 60. Policy I is waived if that parcel has a weight class higher than 86. Question: Which choice is right for Mirela?", "options": ["is consolidated", "is refrigerated"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is refrigerated", "unit_id": "u010820", "pair_id": "u010820-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/21/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010820-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c956347869678485", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a6", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u010853-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Halcyon is encrypted. Halcyon has a replica count of 60. Zephyr has no firewall. Halcyon is provisioned. Halcyon is not idle. Halcyon is not monitored. Zephyr is sharded. Zephyr has a memory allotment of 24. Halcyon is mirrored. Zephyr is not cached. Halcyon is not sharded. Halcyon is throttled. Halcyon has no snapshot. Zephyr is not encrypted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is sharded and further is throttled, it thereby is autoscaled. Point B. If said workload is provisioned and further is monitored, it thereby has a dedicated host. Point C. If said workload has a replica count of maximum 31, it thereby has no failover node. Point D. If said workload is provisioned and further is mirrored, it thereby is sandboxed. Point E. If said workload is provisioned and further has a memory allotment of minimum 15, it thereby has a failover node. Point F. If said workload is provisioned and further is cached, it thereby is stateless. Point G. If said workload is idle, it thereby has no failover node. Point H. If said workload is provisioned and further is encrypted, it thereby is isolated. Point I. If said workload is provisioned and further has a snapshot, it thereby is containerized. Point J. If said workload is provisioned and further has a firewall, it thereby is virtualized. Point K. If said workload is provisioned and further is idle, it thereby is deprecated. Point E is cancelled if said workload is cached. Point I is cancelled if said workload has a firewall. Point H is cancelled if said workload is mirrored. Point F is cancelled if said workload is monitored. Point C supersedes Point E. Point G supersedes Point E. Question: Which choice is true for Halcyon?", "options": ["has a dedicated host", "is virtualized", "is containerized", "is stateless", "is deprecated", "has a failover node", "is sandboxed", "is isolated"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sandboxed", "unit_id": "u010853", "pair_id": "u010853-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010853-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a8c873193b2435fc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a0", "a11", "a17", "a4", "a20", "a12", "a15"]}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u010853-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Halcyon is encrypted. Halcyon has a replica count of 60. Zephyr has no firewall. Halcyon is provisioned. Halcyon is not idle. Halcyon is not monitored. Zephyr is sharded. Zephyr has a memory allotment of 24. Halcyon is not mirrored. Zephyr is not cached. Halcyon is not sharded. Halcyon is throttled. Halcyon has no snapshot. Zephyr is not encrypted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is sharded and further is throttled, it thereby is autoscaled. Point B. If said workload is provisioned and further is monitored, it thereby has a dedicated host. Point C. If said workload has a replica count of maximum 31, it thereby has no failover node. Point D. If said workload is provisioned and further is mirrored, it thereby is sandboxed. Point E. If said workload is provisioned and further has a memory allotment of minimum 15, it thereby has a failover node. Point F. If said workload is provisioned and further is cached, it thereby is stateless. Point G. If said workload is idle, it thereby has no failover node. Point H. If said workload is provisioned and further is encrypted, it thereby is isolated. Point I. If said workload is provisioned and further has a snapshot, it thereby is containerized. Point J. If said workload is provisioned and further has a firewall, it thereby is virtualized. Point K. If said workload is provisioned and further is idle, it thereby is deprecated. Point E is cancelled if said workload is cached. Point I is cancelled if said workload has a firewall. Point H is cancelled if said workload is mirrored. Point F is cancelled if said workload is monitored. Point C supersedes Point E. Point G supersedes Point E. Question: Which choice is true for Halcyon?", "options": ["has a dedicated host", "is virtualized", "is containerized", "is stateless", "is deprecated", "has a failover node", "is sandboxed", "is isolated"], "target": 7, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is isolated", "unit_id": "u010853", "pair_id": "u010853-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010853-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "390265d059bb9330", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a0", "a11", "a17", "a4", "a20", "a12", "a15"]}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u010857-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo has no deductible waiver. Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has no adjuster. Celeste has no flood coverage. Viggo is retired. Yara is retired. Viggo has roadside assistance. Viggo is not uninsurable. Celeste is not uninsurable. Viggo has flood coverage. Viggo is bundled. Xaver is not uninsurable. Yara has no deductible waiver. Xaver is bundled. Viggo has no beneficiary. Celeste is indemnified. Xaver has roadside assistance. Yara is bundled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also has no dashcam. Clause 2: once any policyholder is indemnified, it also is covered. Clause 3: once any policyholder has a beneficiary, it also is grandfathered. Clause 4: once any policyholder has a dashcam, it also is appraised. Clause 5: once any policyholder is appraised and also is retired, it also is reimbursed. Clause 6: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is not reimbursed. Clause 7: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also is not covered. Clause 8: once any policyholder is appraised and also is a smoker and also is bundled, it also is subrogated. Clause 9: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also is not a smoker. Clause 10: once any policyholder is not indemnified, it also is a smoker. Clause 11: once any policyholder has roadside assistance and also has flood coverage, it also has a dashcam. Clause 12: once any policyholder is inspected, it also is not appraised. Clause 13: once any policyholder is uninsurable, it also is inspected. Clause 11 overrides Clause 1. Clause 10 overrides Clause 9. Clause 4 overrides Clause 12. Clause 7 overrides Clause 2. Clause 6 overrides Clause 5. Question: Which of these is true of Viggo?", "options": ["is subrogated", "is reimbursed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u010857", "pair_id": "u010857-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010857-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d84b9f117a006381", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a15"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u010857-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo has no deductible waiver. Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has no adjuster. Celeste has no flood coverage. Viggo is retired. Yara is retired. Viggo has roadside assistance. Viggo is not uninsurable. Celeste is not uninsurable. Viggo has flood coverage. Viggo is bundled. Xaver is not uninsurable. Yara has no deductible waiver. Xaver is bundled. Viggo has no beneficiary. Celeste is indemnified. Xaver has roadside assistance. Yara is bundled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also has no dashcam. Clause 2: once any policyholder is indemnified, it also is covered. Clause 3: once any policyholder has a beneficiary, it also is grandfathered. Clause 4: once any policyholder has a dashcam, it also is appraised. Clause 5: once any policyholder is appraised and also is retired, it also is reimbursed. Clause 6: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is not reimbursed. Clause 7: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also is not covered. Clause 8: once any policyholder is appraised and also is a smoker and also is bundled, it also is subrogated. Clause 9: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also is not a smoker. Clause 10: once any policyholder is indemnified, it also is a smoker. Clause 11: once any policyholder has roadside assistance and also has flood coverage, it also has a dashcam. Clause 12: once any policyholder is inspected, it also is not appraised. Clause 13: once any policyholder is uninsurable, it also is inspected. Clause 11 overrides Clause 1. Clause 10 overrides Clause 9. Clause 4 overrides Clause 12. Clause 7 overrides Clause 2. Clause 6 overrides Clause 5. Question: Which of these is true of Viggo?", "options": ["is subrogated", "is reimbursed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is subrogated", "unit_id": "u010857", "pair_id": "u010857-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010857-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e11f2ca9dbd98716", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a15"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u010857-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo has no deductible waiver. Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has no adjuster. Celeste has no flood coverage. Viggo is retired. Yara is retired. Viggo has roadside assistance. Viggo is not uninsurable. Celeste is not uninsurable. Viggo has flood coverage. Viggo is bundled. Xaver is not uninsurable. Yara has no deductible waiver. Xaver is bundled. Viggo has no beneficiary. Celeste is indemnified. Xaver has roadside assistance. Yara is bundled.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has flood coverage, that policyholder has no dashcam. Item B. When the policyholder is indemnified, that policyholder is covered. Item C. When the policyholder has a beneficiary, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item D. When the policyholder has a dashcam, that policyholder is appraised. Item E. When the policyholder is appraised, and is retired, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item F. When the policyholder is a smoker, that policyholder is not reimbursed. Item G. When the policyholder has flood coverage, that policyholder is not covered. Item H. When the policyholder is appraised, and is a smoker, and is bundled, that policyholder is subrogated. Item I. When the policyholder has a deductible waiver, that policyholder is not a smoker. Item J. When the policyholder is not indemnified, that policyholder is a smoker. Item K. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, and has flood coverage, that policyholder has a dashcam. Item L. When the policyholder is inspected, that policyholder is not appraised. Item M. When the policyholder is uninsurable, that policyholder is inspected. Item K outranks Item A. Item J outranks Item I. Item D outranks Item L. Item G outranks Item B. Item F outranks Item E. Question: What applies to Viggo?", "options": ["is subrogated", "is reimbursed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u010857", "pair_id": "u010857-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010857-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d84b9f117a006381", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a15"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u010857-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo has no deductible waiver. Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has no adjuster. Celeste has no flood coverage. Viggo is retired. Yara is retired. Viggo has roadside assistance. Viggo is not uninsurable. Celeste is not uninsurable. Viggo has flood coverage. Viggo is bundled. Xaver is not uninsurable. Yara has no deductible waiver. Xaver is bundled. Viggo has no beneficiary. Celeste is indemnified. Xaver has roadside assistance. Yara is bundled.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has flood coverage, that policyholder has no dashcam. Item B. When the policyholder is indemnified, that policyholder is covered. Item C. When the policyholder has a beneficiary, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item D. When the policyholder has a dashcam, that policyholder is appraised. Item E. When the policyholder is appraised, and is retired, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item F. When the policyholder is a smoker, that policyholder is not reimbursed. Item G. When the policyholder has flood coverage, that policyholder is not covered. Item H. When the policyholder is appraised, and is a smoker, and is bundled, that policyholder is subrogated. Item I. When the policyholder has a deductible waiver, that policyholder is not a smoker. Item J. When the policyholder is indemnified, that policyholder is a smoker. Item K. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, and has flood coverage, that policyholder has a dashcam. Item L. When the policyholder is inspected, that policyholder is not appraised. Item M. When the policyholder is uninsurable, that policyholder is inspected. Item K outranks Item A. Item J outranks Item I. Item D outranks Item L. Item G outranks Item B. Item F outranks Item E. Question: What applies to Viggo?", "options": ["is subrogated", "is reimbursed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is subrogated", "unit_id": "u010857", "pair_id": "u010857-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010857-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e11f2ca9dbd98716", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a15"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u010928-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is not freelance. Noor is not eligible. Olek is not eligible. Noor is not freelance. Noor is not seasoned. Noor is bonded. Olek is seasoned.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is bilingual while is eligible, thus it is not certified. Provision 2: when the candidate here is onboarded while is eligible while is bonded, thus it is not bilingual. Provision 3: when the candidate here is eligible, thus it is onboarded. Provision 4: when the candidate here is freelance, thus it is headhunted. Provision 5: when the candidate here is onboarded while is seasoned while is eligible, thus it is bilingual. Question: Would it be right to say that Olek is bilingual?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010928", "pair_id": "u010928-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010928-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "683daa53afb69224", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010928-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is freelance. Noor is not eligible. Olek is not eligible. Noor is not freelance. Noor is not seasoned. Noor is bonded. Olek is seasoned.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is bilingual while is eligible, thus it is not certified. Provision 2: when the candidate here is onboarded while is eligible while is bonded, thus it is not bilingual. Provision 3: when the candidate here is eligible, thus it is onboarded. Provision 4: when the candidate here is freelance, thus it is headhunted. Provision 5: when the candidate here is onboarded while is seasoned while is eligible, thus it is bilingual. Question: Would it be right to say that Olek is bilingual?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010928", "pair_id": "u010928-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010928-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "c4640815d082129b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010928-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is not freelance. Noor is not eligible. Olek is not eligible. Noor is not freelance. Noor is not seasoned. Noor is bonded. Olek is seasoned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is bilingual and likewise is eligible, so it is not certified. No. 2 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise is eligible and likewise is bonded, so it is not bilingual. No. 3 While the given candidate is eligible, so it is onboarded. No. 4 While the given candidate is freelance, so it is headhunted. No. 5 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise is seasoned and likewise is eligible, so it is bilingual. Question: Is the claim \"Olek is bilingual\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010928", "pair_id": "u010928-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010928-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "683daa53afb69224", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010928-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is freelance. Noor is not eligible. Olek is not eligible. Noor is not freelance. Noor is not seasoned. Noor is bonded. Olek is seasoned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is bilingual and likewise is eligible, so it is not certified. No. 2 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise is eligible and likewise is bonded, so it is not bilingual. No. 3 While the given candidate is eligible, so it is onboarded. No. 4 While the given candidate is freelance, so it is headhunted. No. 5 While the given candidate is onboarded and likewise is seasoned and likewise is eligible, so it is bilingual. Question: Is the claim \"Olek is bilingual\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u010928", "pair_id": "u010928-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010928-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "c4640815d082129b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u010932-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is cofunded. Capella is endorsed. Capella has a patent filing. Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is peer reviewed. Betelgeuse is not budgeted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is cofunded and also has a review mark of 85 or less and also is not budgeted, it also is a pilot study. Clause 2: once any proposal is cofunded and also has a review mark over 85 and also is endorsed, it also is multicenter. Clause 3: once any proposal is cofunded and also has a patent filing, it also has a steering committee. Clause 4: once any proposal is peer reviewed, it also is shortlisted. Clause 3 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a review mark over 41. Question: Which of these is true of Betelgeuse?", "options": ["is multicenter", "has a steering committee", "is a pilot study"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a steering committee", "unit_id": "u010932", "pair_id": "u010932-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010932-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3b8ddebe678dffaf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a2", "a0", "a9"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u010932-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is cofunded. Capella is endorsed. Capella has a patent filing. Betelgeuse has a review mark of 70. Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is peer reviewed. Betelgeuse is not budgeted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is cofunded and also has a review mark of 85 or less and also is not budgeted, it also is a pilot study. Clause 2: once any proposal is cofunded and also has a review mark over 85 and also is endorsed, it also is multicenter. Clause 3: once any proposal is cofunded and also has a patent filing, it also has a steering committee. Clause 4: once any proposal is peer reviewed, it also is shortlisted. Clause 3 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a review mark over 41. Question: Which of these is true of Betelgeuse?", "options": ["is multicenter", "has a steering committee", "is a pilot study"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a pilot study", "unit_id": "u010932", "pair_id": "u010932-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u010932-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c803b01ee8748f77", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a2", "a0", "a9"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u010963-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has a firewall. Orrery has no snapshot. Orrery has a failover node. Tundra has a firewall. Tundra has a snapshot. Nimbus has no firewall. Vesper has no failover node. Orrery has a CPU quota of 12. Tundra has no failover node.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is deprecated, and has a replica count of more than 58, that workload is monitored. Item B. When the workload has a CPU quota of no more than 24, that workload is provisioned. Item C. When the workload is deprecated, and has a replica count of no more than 58, that workload is sharded. Item D. When the workload has a firewall, that workload is not cached. Item E. When the workload is deprecated, and is throttled, that workload has a GPU. Item F. When the workload is deprecated, and has a failover node, that workload is sandboxed. Item G. When the workload is deprecated, and has a snapshot, that workload is idle. Item H. When the workload is provisioned, that workload is deprecated. Item F is suspended when the workload has a snapshot. Question: What applies to Orrery?", "options": ["is monitored", "has a GPU", "is sharded", "is idle", "is sandboxed"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is sandboxed", "unit_id": "u010963", "pair_id": "u010963-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010963-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "48124fc23642f59f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a2", "a0", "a12", "a5", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u010963-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has no firewall. Orrery has no snapshot. Orrery has a failover node. Tundra has a firewall. Tundra has a snapshot. Nimbus has no firewall. Vesper has no failover node. Orrery has a CPU quota of 12. Tundra has no failover node.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is deprecated, and has a replica count of more than 58, that workload is monitored. Item B. When the workload has a CPU quota of no more than 24, that workload is provisioned. Item C. When the workload is deprecated, and has a replica count of no more than 58, that workload is sharded. Item D. When the workload has a firewall, that workload is not cached. Item E. When the workload is deprecated, and is throttled, that workload has a GPU. Item F. When the workload is deprecated, and has a failover node, that workload is sandboxed. Item G. When the workload is deprecated, and has a snapshot, that workload is idle. Item H. When the workload is provisioned, that workload is deprecated. Item F is suspended when the workload has a snapshot. Question: What applies to Orrery?", "options": ["is monitored", "has a GPU", "is sharded", "is idle", "is sandboxed"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is sandboxed", "unit_id": "u010963", "pair_id": "u010963-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010963-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d15164f2965754c3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a2", "a0", "a12", "a5", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u010981-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is peer reviewed. Electra is peer reviewed. Mirach has a steering committee. Electra is not collaborative. Mirach is not shortlisted. Electra is theoretical. Mirach is exploratory. Mirach is not renewed. Electra is exploratory. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is not shortlisted. Electra is not multicenter. Betelgeuse is not multicenter. Electra has no seed funding. Betelgeuse has no seed funding. Electra is renewed. Electra has a field site. Mirach is not multicenter.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is multicenter while has a field site while is peer reviewed, thus it has no patent filing. Provision 2: when the proposal here is peer reviewed while is collaborative, thus it is resubmitted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is peer reviewed while is shortlisted, thus it is cofunded. Provision 4: when the proposal here is peer reviewed while has seed funding, thus it has ethics clearance. Provision 5: when the proposal here is peer reviewed while is renewed while is theoretical, thus it is endorsed. Provision 6: when the proposal here is exploratory, thus it is preregistered. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here has a steering committee. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here is collaborative. Provision 5 has no effect when the proposal here is shortlisted. Provision 1 has no effect when the proposal here has seed funding. Question: Which one describes Electra?", "options": ["is resubmitted", "is cofunded", "is endorsed", "has ethics clearance"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u010981", "pair_id": "u010981-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010981-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bac2dd3e2e0c1422", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a2", "a14", "a13"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u010981-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is peer reviewed. Electra is peer reviewed. Mirach has a steering committee. Electra is not collaborative. Mirach is not shortlisted. Electra is theoretical. Mirach is exploratory. Mirach is not renewed. Electra is not exploratory. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is not shortlisted. Electra is not multicenter. Betelgeuse is not multicenter. Electra has no seed funding. Betelgeuse has no seed funding. Electra is renewed. Electra has a field site. Mirach is not multicenter.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is multicenter while has a field site while is peer reviewed, thus it has no patent filing. Provision 2: when the proposal here is peer reviewed while is collaborative, thus it is resubmitted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is peer reviewed while is shortlisted, thus it is cofunded. Provision 4: when the proposal here is peer reviewed while has seed funding, thus it has ethics clearance. Provision 5: when the proposal here is peer reviewed while is renewed while is theoretical, thus it is endorsed. Provision 6: when the proposal here is exploratory, thus it is preregistered. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here has a steering committee. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here is collaborative. Provision 5 has no effect when the proposal here is shortlisted. Provision 1 has no effect when the proposal here has seed funding. Question: Which one describes Electra?", "options": ["is resubmitted", "is cofunded", "is endorsed", "has ethics clearance"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u010981", "pair_id": "u010981-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010981-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3aecf1825f6e5078", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a2", "a14", "a13"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u010981-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is peer reviewed. Electra is peer reviewed. Mirach has a steering committee. Electra is not collaborative. Mirach is not shortlisted. Electra is theoretical. Mirach is exploratory. Mirach is not renewed. Electra is exploratory. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is not shortlisted. Electra is not multicenter. Betelgeuse is not multicenter. Electra has no seed funding. Betelgeuse has no seed funding. Electra is renewed. Electra has a field site. Mirach is not multicenter.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is multicenter and likewise has a field site and likewise is peer reviewed, so it has no patent filing. No. 2 While the given proposal is peer reviewed and likewise is collaborative, so it is resubmitted. No. 3 While the given proposal is peer reviewed and likewise is shortlisted, so it is cofunded. No. 4 While the given proposal is peer reviewed and likewise has seed funding, so it has ethics clearance. No. 5 While the given proposal is peer reviewed and likewise is renewed and likewise is theoretical, so it is endorsed. No. 6 While the given proposal is exploratory, so it is preregistered. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a steering committee. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal is collaborative. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given proposal is shortlisted. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal has seed funding. Question: Select what holds for Electra: which option?", "options": ["is resubmitted", "is cofunded", "is endorsed", "has ethics clearance"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u010981", "pair_id": "u010981-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010981-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bac2dd3e2e0c1422", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a2", "a14", "a13"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u010981-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is peer reviewed. Electra is peer reviewed. Mirach has a steering committee. Electra is not collaborative. Mirach is not shortlisted. Electra is theoretical. Mirach is exploratory. Mirach is not renewed. Electra is not exploratory. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is not shortlisted. Electra is not multicenter. Betelgeuse is not multicenter. Electra has no seed funding. Betelgeuse has no seed funding. Electra is renewed. Electra has a field site. Mirach is not multicenter.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is multicenter and likewise has a field site and likewise is peer reviewed, so it has no patent filing. No. 2 While the given proposal is peer reviewed and likewise is collaborative, so it is resubmitted. No. 3 While the given proposal is peer reviewed and likewise is shortlisted, so it is cofunded. No. 4 While the given proposal is peer reviewed and likewise has seed funding, so it has ethics clearance. No. 5 While the given proposal is peer reviewed and likewise is renewed and likewise is theoretical, so it is endorsed. No. 6 While the given proposal is exploratory, so it is preregistered. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a steering committee. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal is collaborative. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given proposal is shortlisted. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal has seed funding. Question: Select what holds for Electra: which option?", "options": ["is resubmitted", "is cofunded", "is endorsed", "has ethics clearance"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u010981", "pair_id": "u010981-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u010981-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3aecf1825f6e5078", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a2", "a14", "a13"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u011030-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is sealed. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 94.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel has a locker slot, then it is rerouted. (2) If a parcel has a parcel volume below 24, then it is prepaid. (3) If a parcel is not damaged, then it is palletized. (4) If a parcel has a locker slot, then it is delayed. (5) If a parcel has a locker slot, then it is not delayed. (4) is void if the parcel is not tracked. (2) is void if the parcel is damaged. (5) is void if the parcel is refrigerated. (4) is void if the parcel has a parcel volume below 89. (5) is void if the parcel has a parcel volume of at least 89. Question: Is it true that Rasmus is delayed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011030", "pair_id": "u011030-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011030-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3cb400da821ab1d9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011030-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is sealed. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 94.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel has a locker slot, then it is rerouted. (2) If a parcel has a parcel volume below 24, then it is prepaid. (3) If a parcel is not damaged, then it is palletized. (4) If a parcel is sealed, then it has a locker slot. (5) If a parcel has a locker slot, then it is delayed. (6) If a parcel has a locker slot, then it is not delayed. (5) is void if the parcel is not tracked. (2) is void if the parcel is damaged. (6) is void if the parcel is refrigerated. (5) is void if the parcel has a parcel volume below 89. (6) is void if the parcel has a parcel volume of at least 89. Question: Is it true that Rasmus is delayed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011030", "pair_id": "u011030-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011030-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cd83f72725305e66", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011030-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is sealed. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 94.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel has a locker slot, it also is rerouted. Clause 2: once any parcel has a parcel volume under 24, it also is prepaid. Clause 3: once any parcel is not damaged, it also is palletized. Clause 4: once any parcel has a locker slot, it also is delayed. Clause 5: once any parcel has a locker slot, it also is not delayed. Clause 4 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is not tracked. Clause 2 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is damaged. Clause 5 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is refrigerated. Clause 4 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel has a parcel volume under 89. Clause 5 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel has a parcel volume of 89 or more. Question: Does it follow that Rasmus is delayed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011030", "pair_id": "u011030-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011030-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3cb400da821ab1d9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011030-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is sealed. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 94.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel has a locker slot, it also is rerouted. Clause 2: once any parcel has a parcel volume under 24, it also is prepaid. Clause 3: once any parcel is not damaged, it also is palletized. Clause 4: once any parcel is sealed, it also has a locker slot. Clause 5: once any parcel has a locker slot, it also is delayed. Clause 6: once any parcel has a locker slot, it also is not delayed. Clause 5 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is not tracked. Clause 2 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is damaged. Clause 6 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is refrigerated. Clause 5 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel has a parcel volume under 89. Clause 6 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel has a parcel volume of 89 or more. Question: Does it follow that Rasmus is delayed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011030", "pair_id": "u011030-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011030-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cd83f72725305e66", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011032-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is freelance. Lotte is not licensed. Noor is not licensed. Olek has no diploma. Lotte has a diploma. Olek is not licensed. Olek is not probationary. Rune has no diploma. Rune is probationary. Lotte is headhunted. Olek is not headhunted. Lotte is freelance. Rune is headhunted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is a veteran provided that it has a diploma. Section 2: a candidate is fingerprinted provided that it is headhunted. Section 3: a candidate is not a veteran provided that it is probationary. Section 4: a candidate is not fingerprinted provided that it is headhunted. Section 4 lapses for a candidate if it is licensed. Section 2 lapses for a candidate if it is probationary. Section 1 lapses for a candidate if it is freelance. Section 4 lapses for a candidate if it is freelance. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Olek is fingerprinted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011032", "pair_id": "u011032-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011032-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1c810af67d76dff9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011032-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is freelance. Lotte is not licensed. Noor is not licensed. Olek has no diploma. Lotte has a diploma. Olek is not licensed. Olek is not probationary. Rune has no diploma. Rune is probationary. Lotte is headhunted. Olek is headhunted. Lotte is freelance. Rune is headhunted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is a veteran provided that it has a diploma. Section 2: a candidate is fingerprinted provided that it is headhunted. Section 3: a candidate is not a veteran provided that it is probationary. Section 4: a candidate is not fingerprinted provided that it is headhunted. Section 4 lapses for a candidate if it is licensed. Section 2 lapses for a candidate if it is probationary. Section 1 lapses for a candidate if it is freelance. Section 4 lapses for a candidate if it is freelance. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Olek is fingerprinted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011032", "pair_id": "u011032-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011032-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b31e0b74b4602569", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011032-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is freelance. Lotte is not licensed. Noor is not licensed. Olek has no diploma. Lotte has a diploma. Olek is not licensed. Olek is not probationary. Rune has no diploma. Rune is probationary. Lotte is headhunted. Olek is not headhunted. Lotte is freelance. Rune is headhunted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a diploma: then it is a veteran. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it is fingerprinted. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is probationary: then it is not a veteran. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it is not fingerprinted. Policy IV is waived if that candidate is licensed. Policy II is waived if that candidate is probationary. Policy I is waived if that candidate is freelance. Policy IV is waived if that candidate is freelance. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Olek is fingerprinted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011032", "pair_id": "u011032-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011032-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1c810af67d76dff9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011032-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is freelance. Lotte is not licensed. Noor is not licensed. Olek has no diploma. Lotte has a diploma. Olek is not licensed. Olek is not probationary. Rune has no diploma. Rune is probationary. Lotte is headhunted. Olek is headhunted. Lotte is freelance. Rune is headhunted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a diploma: then it is a veteran. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it is fingerprinted. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is probationary: then it is not a veteran. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it is not fingerprinted. Policy IV is waived if that candidate is licensed. Policy II is waived if that candidate is probationary. Policy I is waived if that candidate is freelance. Policy IV is waived if that candidate is freelance. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Olek is fingerprinted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011032", "pair_id": "u011032-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011032-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b31e0b74b4602569", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011036-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is overdrawn. Greta has no cosigner. Corin is overdrawn. Corin is not a homeowner. Corin has no cosigner. Greta is a homeowner. Evren has a cosigner. Evren is overdrawn. Evren is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is not overdrawn, that borrower has collateral. Item B. When the borrower is creditworthy, that borrower is solvent. Item C. When the borrower is solvent, that borrower is vetted. Item D. When the borrower has no guarantor, that borrower is not vetted. Item E. When the borrower is a homeowner, that borrower has a mortgage. Item F. When the borrower has collateral, that borrower has no guarantor. Item G. When the borrower has no cosigner, that borrower is creditworthy. Item H. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower is not amortized. Question: Can one infer that Greta is vetted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011036", "pair_id": "u011036-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011036-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "af311c4edc34fb3e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011036-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is overdrawn. Greta has no cosigner. Corin is overdrawn. Corin is not a homeowner. Corin has no cosigner. Greta is a homeowner. Evren has a cosigner. Evren is overdrawn. Evren is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is not overdrawn, that borrower has collateral. Item B. When the borrower is creditworthy, that borrower is solvent. Item C. When the borrower is solvent, that borrower is vetted. Item D. When the borrower has no guarantor, that borrower is not vetted. Item E. When the borrower is a homeowner, that borrower has a mortgage. Item F. When the borrower has collateral, that borrower has no guarantor. Item G. When the borrower has a cosigner, that borrower is creditworthy. Item H. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower is not amortized. Question: Can one infer that Greta is vetted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011036", "pair_id": "u011036-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011036-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "8f6811e8c1b41a57", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011087-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is sponsored. Noor is a graduate. Hedda is not unionized. Rune is a graduate. Noor is not unionized. Noor is sponsored.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is bonded, then it is not certified. (2) If a candidate is sponsored, then it is not bonded. (3) If a candidate is not unionized, then it is onboarded. (4) If a candidate is a graduate, then it is a veteran. (5) If a candidate is unionized, then it is not a veteran. (6) If a candidate is onboarded, then it is certified. (7) If a candidate is unionized, then it is bonded. When (2) and (7) clash, (2) prevails. When (1) and (6) clash, (1) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Noor is certified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011087", "pair_id": "u011087-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011087-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fff8c5923c2c1160", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u011087-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is sponsored. Noor is a graduate. Hedda is not unionized. Rune is a graduate. Noor is not unionized. Noor is sponsored.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is bonded, then it is not certified. (2) If a candidate is sponsored, then it is not bonded. (3) If a candidate is unionized, then it is onboarded. (4) If a candidate is a graduate, then it is a veteran. (5) If a candidate is unionized, then it is not a veteran. (6) If a candidate is onboarded, then it is certified. (7) If a candidate is unionized, then it is bonded. When (2) and (7) clash, (2) prevails. When (1) and (6) clash, (1) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Noor is certified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011087", "pair_id": "u011087-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011087-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "6cf3a8668753bffe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u011087-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is sponsored. Noor is a graduate. Hedda is not unionized. Rune is a graduate. Noor is not unionized. Noor is sponsored.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is bonded, it also is not certified. Clause 2: once any candidate is sponsored, it also is not bonded. Clause 3: once any candidate is not unionized, it also is onboarded. Clause 4: once any candidate is a graduate, it also is a veteran. Clause 5: once any candidate is unionized, it also is not a veteran. Clause 6: once any candidate is onboarded, it also is certified. Clause 7: once any candidate is unionized, it also is bonded. Clause 2 overrides Clause 7. Clause 1 overrides Clause 6. Clause 4 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Noor is certified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011087", "pair_id": "u011087-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011087-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fff8c5923c2c1160", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u011087-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is sponsored. Noor is a graduate. Hedda is not unionized. Rune is a graduate. Noor is not unionized. Noor is sponsored.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is bonded, it also is not certified. Clause 2: once any candidate is sponsored, it also is not bonded. Clause 3: once any candidate is unionized, it also is onboarded. Clause 4: once any candidate is a graduate, it also is a veteran. Clause 5: once any candidate is unionized, it also is not a veteran. Clause 6: once any candidate is onboarded, it also is certified. Clause 7: once any candidate is unionized, it also is bonded. Clause 2 overrides Clause 7. Clause 1 overrides Clause 6. Clause 4 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Noor is certified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011087", "pair_id": "u011087-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011087-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "6cf3a8668753bffe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u011115-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is not stamped. Nandor is not weighed. Kaveh has a delivery window of 17. Saskia has a delivery window of 78. Nandor is oversized.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is oversized, so it has a waybill. No. 2 While the given parcel is not stamped, so it is misrouted. No. 3 While the given parcel is tracked, so it is consolidated. No. 4 While the given parcel has a waybill, so it is hazardous. No. 5 While the given parcel is consolidated, so it is not undeliverable. No. 6 While the given parcel is hazardous, so it is undeliverable. No. 7 While the given parcel has a delivery window that exceeds 24, so it is tracked. Question: Is the claim \"Nandor is undeliverable\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011115", "pair_id": "u011115-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011115-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1f45132beefc98ff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011115-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is not stamped. Nandor is not weighed. Kaveh has a delivery window of 17. Saskia has a delivery window of 78. Nandor is oversized.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is oversized, so it has a waybill. No. 2 While the given parcel is stamped, so it is misrouted. No. 3 While the given parcel is tracked, so it is consolidated. No. 4 While the given parcel has a waybill, so it is hazardous. No. 5 While the given parcel is consolidated, so it is not undeliverable. No. 6 While the given parcel is hazardous, so it is undeliverable. No. 7 While the given parcel has a delivery window that exceeds 24, so it is tracked. Question: Is the claim \"Nandor is undeliverable\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011115", "pair_id": "u011115-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011115-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "8e8851066b4d72ce", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011124-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not exploratory. Capella has a patent filing. Capella is not preregistered. Capella has seed funding.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has no seed funding, thus it is not theoretical. Provision 2: when the proposal here has no patent filing while is not embargoed while is preregistered, thus it is not budgeted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is embargoed while is not exploratory, thus it is theoretical. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here has no seed funding while is preregistered. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Capella is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011124", "pair_id": "u011124-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011124-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ae2f9d87f5144a64", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011124-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not exploratory. Capella has a patent filing. Capella is not preregistered. Capella is embargoed. Capella has seed funding.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has no seed funding, thus it is not theoretical. Provision 2: when the proposal here has no patent filing while is not embargoed while is preregistered, thus it is not budgeted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is embargoed while is not exploratory, thus it is theoretical. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here has no seed funding while is preregistered. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Capella is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011124", "pair_id": "u011124-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011124-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea6002a96a8addfb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011124-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not exploratory. Capella has a patent filing. Capella is not preregistered. Capella has seed funding.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has no seed funding, it thereby is not theoretical. Point B. If said proposal has no patent filing and further is not embargoed and further is preregistered, it thereby is not budgeted. Point C. If said proposal is embargoed and further is not exploratory, it thereby is theoretical. Point B is cancelled if said proposal has no seed funding and further is preregistered. Point C supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Capella is embargoed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011124", "pair_id": "u011124-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011124-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ae2f9d87f5144a64", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011124-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not exploratory. Capella has a patent filing. Capella is not preregistered. Capella is embargoed. Capella has seed funding.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has no seed funding, it thereby is not theoretical. Point B. If said proposal has no patent filing and further is not embargoed and further is preregistered, it thereby is not budgeted. Point C. If said proposal is embargoed and further is not exploratory, it thereby is theoretical. Point B is cancelled if said proposal has no seed funding and further is preregistered. Point C supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Capella is embargoed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011124", "pair_id": "u011124-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011124-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea6002a96a8addfb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011124-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not exploratory. Capella has a patent filing. Capella is not preregistered. Capella has seed funding.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has no seed funding, so it is not theoretical. No. 2 While the given proposal has no patent filing and likewise is not embargoed and likewise is preregistered, so it is not budgeted. No. 3 While the given proposal is embargoed and likewise is not exploratory, so it is theoretical. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given proposal has no seed funding and likewise is preregistered. No. 3 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Capella is embargoed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011124", "pair_id": "u011124-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011124-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ae2f9d87f5144a64", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011124-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not exploratory. Capella has a patent filing. Capella is not preregistered. Capella is embargoed. Capella has seed funding.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has no seed funding, so it is not theoretical. No. 2 While the given proposal has no patent filing and likewise is not embargoed and likewise is preregistered, so it is not budgeted. No. 3 While the given proposal is embargoed and likewise is not exploratory, so it is theoretical. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given proposal has no seed funding and likewise is preregistered. No. 3 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Capella is embargoed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011124", "pair_id": "u011124-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011124-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea6002a96a8addfb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011155-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has a dashcam. Una is appraised. Edda is a claimant. Zdenek has flood coverage. Edda has flood coverage. Edda has no dashcam. Edda is appraised. Zdenek is appraised.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has no dashcam, then it has a deductible waiver. (2) If a policyholder is not appraised, then it is litigated. (3) If a policyholder is litigated, then it is not covered. (4) If a policyholder has no flood coverage, then it is not indemnified. (5) If a policyholder is a claimant, then it has a premium discount. (6) If a policyholder has a premium discount, then it is covered. (7) If a policyholder is not appraised, then it is grandfathered. Question: Is it true that Zdenek is covered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011155", "pair_id": "u011155-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011155-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "f0ddb96ecac85f47", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011155-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has a dashcam. Una is appraised. Edda is a claimant. Zdenek has flood coverage. Edda has flood coverage. Edda has no dashcam. Edda is appraised. Zdenek is not appraised.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has no dashcam, then it has a deductible waiver. (2) If a policyholder is not appraised, then it is litigated. (3) If a policyholder is litigated, then it is not covered. (4) If a policyholder has no flood coverage, then it is not indemnified. (5) If a policyholder is a claimant, then it has a premium discount. (6) If a policyholder has a premium discount, then it is covered. (7) If a policyholder is not appraised, then it is grandfathered. Question: Is it true that Zdenek is covered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011155", "pair_id": "u011155-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011155-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "cd4fa3ad5d58e023", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011155-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has a dashcam. Una is appraised. Edda is a claimant. Zdenek has flood coverage. Edda has flood coverage. Edda has no dashcam. Edda is appraised. Zdenek is appraised.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has no dashcam, it also has a deductible waiver. Clause 2: once any policyholder is not appraised, it also is litigated. Clause 3: once any policyholder is litigated, it also is not covered. Clause 4: once any policyholder has no flood coverage, it also is not indemnified. Clause 5: once any policyholder is a claimant, it also has a premium discount. Clause 6: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also is covered. Clause 7: once any policyholder is not appraised, it also is grandfathered. Question: Does it follow that Zdenek is covered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011155", "pair_id": "u011155-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011155-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "f0ddb96ecac85f47", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011155-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has a dashcam. Una is appraised. Edda is a claimant. Zdenek has flood coverage. Edda has flood coverage. Edda has no dashcam. Edda is appraised. Zdenek is not appraised.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has no dashcam, it also has a deductible waiver. Clause 2: once any policyholder is not appraised, it also is litigated. Clause 3: once any policyholder is litigated, it also is not covered. Clause 4: once any policyholder has no flood coverage, it also is not indemnified. Clause 5: once any policyholder is a claimant, it also has a premium discount. Clause 6: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also is covered. Clause 7: once any policyholder is not appraised, it also is grandfathered. Question: Does it follow that Zdenek is covered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011155", "pair_id": "u011155-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011155-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "cd4fa3ad5d58e023", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011170-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gunnar is symptomatic. Vilja is rescheduled. Gunnar is hypertensive. Yusuf is waitlisted. Florin is hypertensive. Yusuf is not allergic. Florin is not contagious. Florin is not rescheduled. Florin is allergic. Vilja is contagious. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Yusuf is symptomatic. Florin is waitlisted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is allergic and also is not hypertensive, it also is fasting. Clause 2: once any patient is allergic and also is hypertensive, it also is sedated. Clause 3: once any patient is rescheduled and also is waitlisted, it also is pregnant. Clause 4: once any patient is allergic and also is asthmatic, it also is postoperative. Clause 5: once any patient is not contagious, it also is not pregnant. Clause 6: once any patient is allergic and also is not asthmatic, it also is diabetic. Clause 7: once any patient is contagious, it also is not postoperative. Clause 8: once any patient is allergic and also is not symptomatic and also is hypertensive, it also has a caregiver. Clause 1 does not hold for a patient when any patient is symptomatic. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is asthmatic. Clause 7 overrides Clause 4. Clause 3 overrides Clause 5. Question: Which of these is true of Florin?", "options": ["is fasting", "is diabetic", "has a caregiver", "is sedated", "is postoperative"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sedated", "unit_id": "u011170", "pair_id": "u011170-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011170-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9d448ef50296c7cf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a4", "a9", "a11", "a10", "a0"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u011170-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gunnar is symptomatic. Vilja is rescheduled. Gunnar is hypertensive. Yusuf is waitlisted. Florin is not hypertensive. Yusuf is not allergic. Florin is not contagious. Florin is not rescheduled. Florin is allergic. Vilja is contagious. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Yusuf is symptomatic. Florin is waitlisted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is allergic and also is not hypertensive, it also is fasting. Clause 2: once any patient is allergic and also is hypertensive, it also is sedated. Clause 3: once any patient is rescheduled and also is waitlisted, it also is pregnant. Clause 4: once any patient is allergic and also is asthmatic, it also is postoperative. Clause 5: once any patient is not contagious, it also is not pregnant. Clause 6: once any patient is allergic and also is not asthmatic, it also is diabetic. Clause 7: once any patient is contagious, it also is not postoperative. Clause 8: once any patient is allergic and also is not symptomatic and also is hypertensive, it also has a caregiver. Clause 1 does not hold for a patient when any patient is symptomatic. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is asthmatic. Clause 7 overrides Clause 4. Clause 3 overrides Clause 5. Question: Which of these is true of Florin?", "options": ["is fasting", "is diabetic", "has a caregiver", "is sedated", "is postoperative"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is fasting", "unit_id": "u011170", "pair_id": "u011170-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011170-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a8f2778cb74e8590", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a4", "a9", "a11", "a10", "a0"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u011187-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has a CPU quota of 18. Nimbus is cached. Orrery has no firewall. Orrery has a CPU quota of 18. Nimbus is containerized. Orrery has a replica count of 24. Orrery is not containerized. Nimbus has a replica count of 92. Nimbus is not throttled. Nimbus has a firewall. Orrery has a latency budget of 78. Nimbus is encrypted. Nimbus has a latency budget of 26.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is monitored while has a firewall while is containerized, thus it is deprecated. Provision 2: when the workload here is deprecated while has a replica count at or above 54 while is cached, thus it is not isolated. Provision 3: when the workload here has a firewall, thus it is idle. Provision 4: when the workload here is deprecated while has a replica count beneath 54 while is idle, thus it is isolated. Provision 5: when the workload here is throttled while is containerized, thus it has a public endpoint. Provision 6: when the workload here is cached while is encrypted, thus it is monitored. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here has a memory allotment beyond 52 while has a CPU quota at or below 38. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here has a replica count beneath 44 while has a latency budget at or above 86. Provision 5 has no effect when the workload here has a CPU quota beneath 20. Question: Would it be right to say that Nimbus is not isolated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011187", "pair_id": "u011187-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011187-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "303199f1ac6ed554", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u011187-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has a CPU quota of 18. Nimbus is cached. Orrery has no firewall. Orrery has a CPU quota of 18. Nimbus is containerized. Orrery has a replica count of 24. Orrery is not containerized. Nimbus has a replica count of 92. Nimbus has a memory allotment of 83. Nimbus is not throttled. Nimbus has a firewall. Orrery has a latency budget of 78. Nimbus is encrypted. Nimbus has a latency budget of 26.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is monitored while has a firewall while is containerized, thus it is deprecated. Provision 2: when the workload here is deprecated while has a replica count at or above 54 while is cached, thus it is not isolated. Provision 3: when the workload here has a firewall, thus it is idle. Provision 4: when the workload here is deprecated while has a replica count beneath 54 while is idle, thus it is isolated. Provision 5: when the workload here is throttled while is containerized, thus it has a public endpoint. Provision 6: when the workload here is cached while is encrypted, thus it is monitored. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here has a memory allotment beyond 52 while has a CPU quota at or below 38. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here has a replica count beneath 44 while has a latency budget at or above 86. Provision 5 has no effect when the workload here has a CPU quota beneath 20. Question: Would it be right to say that Nimbus is not isolated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011187", "pair_id": "u011187-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011187-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b439b92981aff191", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u011187-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has a CPU quota of 18. Nimbus is cached. Orrery has no firewall. Orrery has a CPU quota of 18. Nimbus is containerized. Orrery has a replica count of 24. Orrery is not containerized. Nimbus has a replica count of 92. Nimbus is not throttled. Nimbus has a firewall. Orrery has a latency budget of 78. Nimbus is encrypted. Nimbus has a latency budget of 26.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is monitored and further has a firewall and further is containerized, it thereby is deprecated. Point B. If said workload is deprecated and further has a replica count of minimum 54 and further is cached, it thereby is not isolated. Point C. If said workload has a firewall, it thereby is idle. Point D. If said workload is deprecated and further has a replica count short of 54 and further is idle, it thereby is isolated. Point E. If said workload is throttled and further is containerized, it thereby has a public endpoint. Point F. If said workload is cached and further is encrypted, it thereby is monitored. Point A is cancelled if said workload has a memory allotment in excess of 52 and further has a CPU quota of maximum 38. Point C is cancelled if said workload has a replica count short of 44 and further has a latency budget of minimum 86. Point E is cancelled if said workload has a CPU quota short of 20. Question: Statement: Nimbus is not isolated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011187", "pair_id": "u011187-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011187-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "303199f1ac6ed554", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u011187-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has a CPU quota of 18. Nimbus is cached. Orrery has no firewall. Orrery has a CPU quota of 18. Nimbus is containerized. Orrery has a replica count of 24. Orrery is not containerized. Nimbus has a replica count of 92. Nimbus has a memory allotment of 83. Nimbus is not throttled. Nimbus has a firewall. Orrery has a latency budget of 78. Nimbus is encrypted. Nimbus has a latency budget of 26.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is monitored and further has a firewall and further is containerized, it thereby is deprecated. Point B. If said workload is deprecated and further has a replica count of minimum 54 and further is cached, it thereby is not isolated. Point C. If said workload has a firewall, it thereby is idle. Point D. If said workload is deprecated and further has a replica count short of 54 and further is idle, it thereby is isolated. Point E. If said workload is throttled and further is containerized, it thereby has a public endpoint. Point F. If said workload is cached and further is encrypted, it thereby is monitored. Point A is cancelled if said workload has a memory allotment in excess of 52 and further has a CPU quota of maximum 38. Point C is cancelled if said workload has a replica count short of 44 and further has a latency budget of minimum 86. Point E is cancelled if said workload has a CPU quota short of 20. Question: Statement: Nimbus is not isolated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011187", "pair_id": "u011187-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011187-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b439b92981aff191", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u011284-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is not throttled. Borealis has a memory allotment of 70. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 1. Kestrel is provisioned. Halcyon is throttled. Halcyon is not provisioned.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is throttled, thus it is not sharded. Provision 2: when the workload here is replicated, thus it is not monitored. Provision 3: when the workload here is replicated, thus it is isolated. Provision 4: when the workload here is patched, thus it is monitored. Provision 5: when the workload here is provisioned, thus it is sandboxed. Provision 6: when the workload here has a memory allotment beneath 76, thus it is virtualized. Provision 7: when the workload here is throttled, thus it has a failover node. Provision 8: when the workload here is sandboxed, thus it is patched. Question: Would it be right to say that Halcyon is not monitored?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011284", "pair_id": "u011284-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011284-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "1c25faa9b2e84296", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011284-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is not throttled. Borealis has a memory allotment of 70. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 1. Kestrel is provisioned. Halcyon is throttled. Halcyon is not provisioned.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is throttled, thus it is not sharded. Provision 2: when the workload here is replicated, thus it is not monitored. Provision 3: when the workload here is replicated, thus it is isolated. Provision 4: when the workload here is patched, thus it is monitored. Provision 5: when the workload here is provisioned, thus it is sandboxed. Provision 6: when the workload here has a memory allotment beneath 76, thus it is virtualized. Provision 7: when the workload here is throttled, thus it has a failover node. Provision 8: when the workload here is sandboxed, thus it is patched. Provision 9: when the workload here is virtualized, thus it is replicated. Question: Would it be right to say that Halcyon is not monitored?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011284", "pair_id": "u011284-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011284-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "af62413e69f01c0d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011303-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is hypertensive. Xenia has a fever reading of 62. Xenia has a pain level of 37. Xenia is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has an interpreter, it then is not diabetic. #2 Each time a patient has a pain level of 12 or above, it then has an interpreter. #3 Each time a patient is symptomatic, it then is admitted. #4 Each time a patient has an interpreter, it then is diabetic. #5 Each time a patient is symptomatic, it then has a chaperone. #5 is set aside if a patient has a fever reading of 77 or above. #4 is set aside if a patient is hypertensive. #1 is set aside if a patient is not hypertensive. #4 is set aside if a patient is hypertensive. Question: Do the terms above show that Xenia is diabetic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011303", "pair_id": "u011303-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011303-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b0ade38449c5f3b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u011303-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is hypertensive. Xenia has a fever reading of 62. Xenia has a pain level of 37. Xenia is symptomatic.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has an interpreter, it then is not diabetic. #2 Each time a patient has a pain level of 12 or above, it then has an interpreter. #3 Each time a patient is symptomatic, it then is admitted. #4 Each time a patient has an interpreter, it then is diabetic. #5 Each time a patient is symptomatic, it then has a chaperone. #5 is set aside if a patient has a fever reading of 77 or above. #4 is set aside if a patient is hypertensive. #1 is set aside if a patient is not hypertensive. #4 is set aside if a patient is hypertensive. Question: Do the terms above show that Xenia is diabetic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011303", "pair_id": "u011303-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011303-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "39e49b1933ebaaeb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u011328-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is versioned. Basalt is versioned. Basalt is merged. Shale is benchmarked. Mica has a patch cycle of 9. Basalt has a patch cycle of 61. Basalt has a defect tally of 59. Mica has a defect tally of 90. Mica is not merged. Shale is backported. Basalt is backported. Mica is tagged. Shale has a defect tally of 73. Basalt is benchmarked. Shale has a patch cycle of 1. Shale is versioned. Mica is not compiled.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is compiled and is merged, then it is experimental. (2) If a build is backported and has a defect tally above 90 and is benchmarked, then it has a security advisory. (3) If a build is backported and has a defect tally of at most 36, then it has no security advisory. (4) If a build has a defect tally of at most 59 and has a patch cycle of at most 60 and is versioned, then it is fuzzed. (5) If a build has a defect tally of at most 51 and is tagged and is compiled, then it is linted. When (2) and (3) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Basalt has a security advisory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011328", "pair_id": "u011328-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011328-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ada23ed33d981c47", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011328-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is versioned. Basalt is versioned. Basalt is merged. Shale is benchmarked. Mica has a patch cycle of 9. Basalt has a patch cycle of 61. Basalt has a defect tally of 59. Mica has a defect tally of 90. Mica is not merged. Shale is backported. Basalt is backported. Mica is tagged. Shale has a defect tally of 73. Basalt is benchmarked. Shale has a patch cycle of 1. Shale is versioned. Mica is not compiled.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is compiled and is merged, then it is experimental. (2) If a build is backported and has a defect tally above 36 and is benchmarked, then it has a security advisory. (3) If a build is backported and has a defect tally of at most 36, then it has no security advisory. (4) If a build has a defect tally of at most 59 and has a patch cycle of at most 60 and is versioned, then it is fuzzed. (5) If a build has a defect tally of at most 51 and is tagged and is compiled, then it is linted. When (2) and (3) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Basalt has a security advisory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011328", "pair_id": "u011328-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011328-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ab911c167c1738ba", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011375-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not prequalified. Folke is not indebted. Greta is not refinanced. Greta is prequalified. Folke is not a homeowner. Evren has a credit rating of 99. Greta has a credit rating of 14. Greta is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it is bankrupt. Provision 2: when the borrower here is bankrupt, thus it is not pensioned. Provision 3: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it is not audited. Provision 4: when the borrower here is a homeowner, thus it is not vetted. Provision 5: when the borrower here is pensioned, thus it has no escrow account. Provision 6: when the borrower here has a credit rating at or below 22, thus it is audited. Provision 7: when the borrower here is vetted, thus it is pensioned. Provision 8: when the borrower here has a mortgage, thus it is underwritten. Provision 9: when the borrower here is prequalified, thus it is not underwritten. Provision 10: when the borrower here has no mortgage, thus it is vetted. Provision 11: when the borrower here is indebted, thus it is not solvent. Provision 12: when the borrower here is delinquent, thus it has an escrow account. Provision 13: when the borrower here is not solvent, thus it is delinquent. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 12. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Greta has an escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011375", "pair_id": "u011375-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011375-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9c3175ee624ab837", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011375-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not prequalified. Greta is indebted. Folke is not indebted. Greta is not refinanced. Greta is prequalified. Folke is not a homeowner. Evren has a credit rating of 99. Greta has a credit rating of 14. Greta is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it is bankrupt. Provision 2: when the borrower here is bankrupt, thus it is not pensioned. Provision 3: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it is not audited. Provision 4: when the borrower here is a homeowner, thus it is not vetted. Provision 5: when the borrower here is pensioned, thus it has no escrow account. Provision 6: when the borrower here has a credit rating at or below 22, thus it is audited. Provision 7: when the borrower here is vetted, thus it is pensioned. Provision 8: when the borrower here has a mortgage, thus it is underwritten. Provision 9: when the borrower here is prequalified, thus it is not underwritten. Provision 10: when the borrower here has no mortgage, thus it is vetted. Provision 11: when the borrower here is indebted, thus it is not solvent. Provision 12: when the borrower here is delinquent, thus it has an escrow account. Provision 13: when the borrower here is not solvent, thus it is delinquent. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 12. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Greta has an escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011375", "pair_id": "u011375-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011375-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e0954b819453d679", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011375-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not prequalified. Folke is not indebted. Greta is not refinanced. Greta is prequalified. Folke is not a homeowner. Evren has a credit rating of 99. Greta has a credit rating of 14. Greta is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby is bankrupt. Point B. If said borrower is bankrupt, it thereby is not pensioned. Point C. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby is not audited. Point D. If said borrower is a homeowner, it thereby is not vetted. Point E. If said borrower is pensioned, it thereby has no escrow account. Point F. If said borrower has a credit rating of maximum 22, it thereby is audited. Point G. If said borrower is vetted, it thereby is pensioned. Point H. If said borrower has a mortgage, it thereby is underwritten. Point I. If said borrower is prequalified, it thereby is not underwritten. Point J. If said borrower has no mortgage, it thereby is vetted. Point K. If said borrower is indebted, it thereby is not solvent. Point L. If said borrower is delinquent, it thereby has an escrow account. Point M. If said borrower is not solvent, it thereby is delinquent. Point J supersedes Point D. Point C supersedes Point F. Point E supersedes Point L. Point H supersedes Point I. Point G supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Greta has an escrow account. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011375", "pair_id": "u011375-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011375-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9c3175ee624ab837", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011375-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not prequalified. Greta is indebted. Folke is not indebted. Greta is not refinanced. Greta is prequalified. Folke is not a homeowner. Evren has a credit rating of 99. Greta has a credit rating of 14. Greta is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby is bankrupt. Point B. If said borrower is bankrupt, it thereby is not pensioned. Point C. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby is not audited. Point D. If said borrower is a homeowner, it thereby is not vetted. Point E. If said borrower is pensioned, it thereby has no escrow account. Point F. If said borrower has a credit rating of maximum 22, it thereby is audited. Point G. If said borrower is vetted, it thereby is pensioned. Point H. If said borrower has a mortgage, it thereby is underwritten. Point I. If said borrower is prequalified, it thereby is not underwritten. Point J. If said borrower has no mortgage, it thereby is vetted. Point K. If said borrower is indebted, it thereby is not solvent. Point L. If said borrower is delinquent, it thereby has an escrow account. Point M. If said borrower is not solvent, it thereby is delinquent. Point J supersedes Point D. Point C supersedes Point F. Point E supersedes Point L. Point H supersedes Point I. Point G supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Greta has an escrow account. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011375", "pair_id": "u011375-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011375-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e0954b819453d679", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011375-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not prequalified. Folke is not indebted. Greta is not refinanced. Greta is prequalified. Folke is not a homeowner. Evren has a credit rating of 99. Greta has a credit rating of 14. Greta is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is refinanced, so it is bankrupt. No. 2 While the given borrower is bankrupt, so it is not pensioned. No. 3 While the given borrower is refinanced, so it is not audited. No. 4 While the given borrower is a homeowner, so it is not vetted. No. 5 While the given borrower is pensioned, so it has no escrow account. No. 6 While the given borrower has a credit rating not above 22, so it is audited. No. 7 While the given borrower is vetted, so it is pensioned. No. 8 While the given borrower has a mortgage, so it is underwritten. No. 9 While the given borrower is prequalified, so it is not underwritten. No. 10 While the given borrower has no mortgage, so it is vetted. No. 11 While the given borrower is indebted, so it is not solvent. No. 12 While the given borrower is delinquent, so it has an escrow account. No. 13 While the given borrower is not solvent, so it is delinquent. No. 10 wins over No. 4. No. 3 wins over No. 6. No. 5 wins over No. 12. No. 8 wins over No. 9. No. 7 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Greta has an escrow account\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011375", "pair_id": "u011375-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011375-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9c3175ee624ab837", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011375-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not prequalified. Greta is indebted. Folke is not indebted. Greta is not refinanced. Greta is prequalified. Folke is not a homeowner. Evren has a credit rating of 99. Greta has a credit rating of 14. Greta is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is refinanced, so it is bankrupt. No. 2 While the given borrower is bankrupt, so it is not pensioned. No. 3 While the given borrower is refinanced, so it is not audited. No. 4 While the given borrower is a homeowner, so it is not vetted. No. 5 While the given borrower is pensioned, so it has no escrow account. No. 6 While the given borrower has a credit rating not above 22, so it is audited. No. 7 While the given borrower is vetted, so it is pensioned. No. 8 While the given borrower has a mortgage, so it is underwritten. No. 9 While the given borrower is prequalified, so it is not underwritten. No. 10 While the given borrower has no mortgage, so it is vetted. No. 11 While the given borrower is indebted, so it is not solvent. No. 12 While the given borrower is delinquent, so it has an escrow account. No. 13 While the given borrower is not solvent, so it is delinquent. No. 10 wins over No. 4. No. 3 wins over No. 6. No. 5 wins over No. 12. No. 8 wins over No. 9. No. 7 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Greta has an escrow account\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011375", "pair_id": "u011375-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011375-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e0954b819453d679", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011378-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora has a caregiver. Dorian has no caregiver. Benedek is triaged. Zora is not triaged. Cosima has no caregiver. Cosima is not triaged. Benedek has a pain level of 6. Cosima is not hypertensive. Cosima has a pain level of 72. Zora is not hypertensive.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is admitted: then it is not pregnant. Policy II. Suppose that patient is sedated: then it is not referred. Policy III. Suppose that patient is sedated: then it is pregnant. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is hypertensive: then it is admitted. Policy V. Suppose that patient has a pain level no lower than 77: then it is diabetic. Policy VI. Suppose that patient has a caregiver: then it is bedridden. Question: Is it so that Cosima is pregnant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011378", "pair_id": "u011378-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011378-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "f14a0c0e7e053a4c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011378-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora has a caregiver. Dorian has no caregiver. Benedek is triaged. Zora is not triaged. Cosima has no caregiver. Cosima is not triaged. Benedek has a pain level of 6. Cosima is not hypertensive. Cosima has a pain level of 72. Zora is not hypertensive.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is not triaged: then it is sedated. Policy II. Suppose that patient is admitted: then it is not pregnant. Policy III. Suppose that patient is sedated: then it is not referred. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is sedated: then it is pregnant. Policy V. Suppose that patient is hypertensive: then it is admitted. Policy VI. Suppose that patient has a pain level no lower than 77: then it is diabetic. Policy VII. Suppose that patient has a caregiver: then it is bedridden. Question: Is it so that Cosima is pregnant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011378", "pair_id": "u011378-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011378-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "eb9229691454cdcb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011393-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is bedridden. Cosima is not hypertensive. Zora is not pregnant. Zora is sedated. Benedek is referred. Cosima has a chaperone. Benedek is not bedridden. Benedek is not pregnant. Cosima is not ambulatory. Cosima is sedated. Cosima is anemic. Zora is bedridden. Zora is not ambulatory. Benedek has no interpreter. Zora is not referred. Benedek has no chaperone. Benedek is anemic. Zora is anemic.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is anemic, then it is not triaged. (2) If a patient has a pacemaker, then it is postoperative. (3) If a patient has a pacemaker, then it is not postoperative. (4) If a patient is bedridden, then it is asthmatic. (5) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is triaged. (6) If a patient is ambulatory, then it is not admitted. (7) If a patient has an interpreter, then it is not vaccinated. (8) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is vaccinated. (9) If a patient is asthmatic, then it has a pacemaker. (3) is void if the patient is pregnant. (8) is void if the patient is sedated. (6) is void if the patient has a chaperone. (2) is void if the patient is referred. (3) is void if the patient is anemic. (4) is void if the patient is pregnant. When (5) and (1) clash, (5) prevails. When (3) and (2) clash, (3) prevails. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Is it true that Cosima is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011393", "pair_id": "u011393-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011393-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0e173a85b955a45d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a14", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u011393-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is bedridden. Cosima is not hypertensive. Zora is not pregnant. Cosima has an interpreter. Zora is sedated. Benedek is referred. Cosima has a chaperone. Benedek is not bedridden. Benedek is not pregnant. Cosima is not ambulatory. Cosima is sedated. Cosima is anemic. Zora is bedridden. Zora is not ambulatory. Benedek has no interpreter. Zora is not referred. Benedek has no chaperone. Benedek is anemic. Zora is anemic.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is anemic, then it is not triaged. (2) If a patient has a pacemaker, then it is postoperative. (3) If a patient has a pacemaker, then it is not postoperative. (4) If a patient is bedridden, then it is asthmatic. (5) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is triaged. (6) If a patient is ambulatory, then it is not admitted. (7) If a patient has an interpreter, then it is not vaccinated. (8) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is vaccinated. (9) If a patient is asthmatic, then it has a pacemaker. (3) is void if the patient is pregnant. (8) is void if the patient is sedated. (6) is void if the patient has a chaperone. (2) is void if the patient is referred. (3) is void if the patient is anemic. (4) is void if the patient is pregnant. When (5) and (1) clash, (5) prevails. When (3) and (2) clash, (3) prevails. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Is it true that Cosima is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011393", "pair_id": "u011393-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011393-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "66ea2b05938dcfb0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a14", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u011393-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is bedridden. Cosima is not hypertensive. Zora is not pregnant. Zora is sedated. Benedek is referred. Cosima has a chaperone. Benedek is not bedridden. Benedek is not pregnant. Cosima is not ambulatory. Cosima is sedated. Cosima is anemic. Zora is bedridden. Zora is not ambulatory. Benedek has no interpreter. Zora is not referred. Benedek has no chaperone. Benedek is anemic. Zora is anemic.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is anemic, that patient is not triaged. Item B. When the patient has a pacemaker, that patient is postoperative. Item C. When the patient has a pacemaker, that patient is not postoperative. Item D. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is asthmatic. Item E. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient is triaged. Item F. When the patient is ambulatory, that patient is not admitted. Item G. When the patient has an interpreter, that patient is not vaccinated. Item H. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient is vaccinated. Item I. When the patient is asthmatic, that patient has a pacemaker. Item C is suspended when the patient is pregnant. Item H is suspended when the patient is sedated. Item F is suspended when the patient has a chaperone. Item B is suspended when the patient is referred. Item C is suspended when the patient is anemic. Item D is suspended when the patient is pregnant. Item E outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item B. Item H outranks Item G. Question: Can one infer that Cosima is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011393", "pair_id": "u011393-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011393-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0e173a85b955a45d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a14", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u011393-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is bedridden. Cosima is not hypertensive. Zora is not pregnant. Cosima has an interpreter. Zora is sedated. Benedek is referred. Cosima has a chaperone. Benedek is not bedridden. Benedek is not pregnant. Cosima is not ambulatory. Cosima is sedated. Cosima is anemic. Zora is bedridden. Zora is not ambulatory. Benedek has no interpreter. Zora is not referred. Benedek has no chaperone. Benedek is anemic. Zora is anemic.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is anemic, that patient is not triaged. Item B. When the patient has a pacemaker, that patient is postoperative. Item C. When the patient has a pacemaker, that patient is not postoperative. Item D. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is asthmatic. Item E. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient is triaged. Item F. When the patient is ambulatory, that patient is not admitted. Item G. When the patient has an interpreter, that patient is not vaccinated. Item H. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient is vaccinated. Item I. When the patient is asthmatic, that patient has a pacemaker. Item C is suspended when the patient is pregnant. Item H is suspended when the patient is sedated. Item F is suspended when the patient has a chaperone. Item B is suspended when the patient is referred. Item C is suspended when the patient is anemic. Item D is suspended when the patient is pregnant. Item E outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item B. Item H outranks Item G. Question: Can one infer that Cosima is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011393", "pair_id": "u011393-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011393-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "66ea2b05938dcfb0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a14", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u011396-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is not freelance. Petra has an aptitude quotient of 58. Petra is fingerprinted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has an aptitude quotient not below 88, so it is headhunted. No. 2 While the given candidate is not freelance, so it is unionized. No. 3 While the given candidate is certified, so it is not headhunted. No. 1 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Petra is not fingerprinted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011396", "pair_id": "u011396-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011396-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4569a3e62445dfce", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011396-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is not freelance. Petra has an aptitude quotient of 58. Petra is not fingerprinted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has an aptitude quotient not below 88, so it is headhunted. No. 2 While the given candidate is not freelance, so it is unionized. No. 3 While the given candidate is certified, so it is not headhunted. No. 1 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Petra is not fingerprinted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011396", "pair_id": "u011396-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011396-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8c16d9a44f3b313c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011477-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has a citation index of 89. Aldebaran is not renewed. Capella is not renewed. Aldebaran has a citation index of 84. Aldebaran is not exploratory. Capella is exploratory.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has a citation index of maximum 18, it thereby is translational. Point B. If said proposal is exploratory, it thereby is endorsed. Point C. If said proposal is endorsed, it thereby is not resubmitted. Point D. If said proposal is renewed, it thereby is not collaborative. Point E. If said proposal is translational, it thereby is resubmitted. Question: Statement: Aldebaran is resubmitted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011477", "pair_id": "u011477-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011477-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "635d77bab04373b3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011477-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has a citation index of 89. Aldebaran is not renewed. Capella is not renewed. Aldebaran has a citation index of 84. Aldebaran is not exploratory. Capella is exploratory.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has a citation index of maximum 36, it thereby is translational. Point B. If said proposal is exploratory, it thereby is endorsed. Point C. If said proposal is endorsed, it thereby is not resubmitted. Point D. If said proposal is renewed, it thereby is not collaborative. Point E. If said proposal is translational, it thereby is resubmitted. Question: Statement: Aldebaran is resubmitted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011477", "pair_id": "u011477-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011477-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "ad29f5b8c858ebba", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011477-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has a citation index of 89. Aldebaran is not renewed. Capella is not renewed. Aldebaran has a citation index of 84. Aldebaran is not exploratory. Capella is exploratory.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a citation index not above 18, so it is translational. No. 2 While the given proposal is exploratory, so it is endorsed. No. 3 While the given proposal is endorsed, so it is not resubmitted. No. 4 While the given proposal is renewed, so it is not collaborative. No. 5 While the given proposal is translational, so it is resubmitted. Question: Is the claim \"Aldebaran is resubmitted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011477", "pair_id": "u011477-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011477-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "635d77bab04373b3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011477-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has a citation index of 89. Aldebaran is not renewed. Capella is not renewed. Aldebaran has a citation index of 84. Aldebaran is not exploratory. Capella is exploratory.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a citation index not above 36, so it is translational. No. 2 While the given proposal is exploratory, so it is endorsed. No. 3 While the given proposal is endorsed, so it is not resubmitted. No. 4 While the given proposal is renewed, so it is not collaborative. No. 5 While the given proposal is translational, so it is resubmitted. Question: Is the claim \"Aldebaran is resubmitted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011477", "pair_id": "u011477-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011477-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "ad29f5b8c858ebba", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011482-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is indemnified. Dmitri is indemnified. Fabian has a claim frequency of 84. Fabian has no flood coverage. Dmitri has flood coverage.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a claim frequency over 54, it also has an adjuster. Clause 2: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also has no adjuster. Question: Does it follow that Fabian has an adjuster?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011482", "pair_id": "u011482-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011482-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "4f3dba18c1594485", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u011482-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is indemnified. Dmitri is indemnified. Fabian has a claim frequency of 84. Fabian has no flood coverage. Dmitri has flood coverage.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is indemnified, it also has a dashcam. Clause 2: once any policyholder has a claim frequency over 54, it also has an adjuster. Clause 3: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also has no adjuster. Question: Does it follow that Fabian has an adjuster?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011482", "pair_id": "u011482-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011482-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "de25893da45f346c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u011498-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar has a failover node. Nimbus has a failover node. Cobalt has a failover node. Nimbus has a CPU quota of 26. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 24. Quasar is not provisioned. Cobalt is not provisioned.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is sharded provided that it has no failover node as well as has a CPU quota lower than 42 as well as is not provisioned. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it has no failover node. Question: Nimbus is mirrored. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011498", "pair_id": "u011498-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011498-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "83abefd324a455c4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011498-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar has a failover node. Nimbus is not mirrored. Nimbus has a failover node. Cobalt has a failover node. Nimbus has a CPU quota of 26. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 24. Quasar is not provisioned. Cobalt is not provisioned.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is sharded provided that it has no failover node as well as has a CPU quota lower than 42 as well as is not provisioned. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it has no failover node. Question: Nimbus is mirrored. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011498", "pair_id": "u011498-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011498-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0fd22fcf0d25178a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011498-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar has a failover node. Nimbus has a failover node. Cobalt has a failover node. Nimbus has a CPU quota of 26. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 24. Quasar is not provisioned. Cobalt is not provisioned.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload has no failover node plus has a CPU quota smaller than 42 plus is not provisioned: then it is sharded. Policy I is waived if that workload has no failover node. Question: Is it so that Nimbus is mirrored?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011498", "pair_id": "u011498-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011498-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "83abefd324a455c4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011498-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar has a failover node. Nimbus is not mirrored. Nimbus has a failover node. Cobalt has a failover node. Nimbus has a CPU quota of 26. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 24. Quasar is not provisioned. Cobalt is not provisioned.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload has no failover node plus has a CPU quota smaller than 42 plus is not provisioned: then it is sharded. Policy I is waived if that workload has no failover node. Question: Is it so that Nimbus is mirrored?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011498", "pair_id": "u011498-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011498-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0fd22fcf0d25178a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011498-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar has a failover node. Nimbus has a failover node. Cobalt has a failover node. Nimbus has a CPU quota of 26. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 24. Quasar is not provisioned. Cobalt is not provisioned.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload has no failover node and additionally has a CPU quota less than 42 and additionally is not provisioned, it then is sharded. #1 is set aside if a workload has no failover node. Question: Do the terms above show that Nimbus is mirrored?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011498", "pair_id": "u011498-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011498-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "83abefd324a455c4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011498-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar has a failover node. Nimbus is not mirrored. Nimbus has a failover node. Cobalt has a failover node. Nimbus has a CPU quota of 26. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 24. Quasar is not provisioned. Cobalt is not provisioned.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload has no failover node and additionally has a CPU quota less than 42 and additionally is not provisioned, it then is sharded. #1 is set aside if a workload has no failover node. Question: Do the terms above show that Nimbus is mirrored?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011498", "pair_id": "u011498-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011498-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0fd22fcf0d25178a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011500-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hamid is not audited. Hamid has collateral. Hamid has a debt ratio of 87. Hamid has a risk tier of 92.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has a debt ratio not above 88 and likewise has a risk tier not below 85, so it is prequalified. No. 2 While the given borrower has a debt ratio not above 88 and likewise has a credit rating not below 61 and likewise is audited, so it has an escrow account. No. 3 While the given borrower has a debt ratio not above 88 and likewise has a risk tier that falls below 85, so it is employed. No. 4 While the given borrower has a cosigner, so it is not overdrawn. No. 5 While the given borrower has a debt ratio not above 88 and likewise has a credit rating that falls below 61 and likewise has collateral, so it is solvent. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given borrower has collateral. Question: Select what holds for Hamid: which option?", "options": ["has an escrow account", "is solvent", "is prequalified", "is employed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prequalified", "unit_id": "u011500", "pair_id": "u011500-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011500-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "da45728ac16f26ec", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a2", "a7", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011500-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hamid is not audited. Hamid has collateral. Hamid has a debt ratio of 72. Hamid has a risk tier of 92.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has a debt ratio not above 88 and likewise has a risk tier not below 85, so it is prequalified. No. 2 While the given borrower has a debt ratio not above 88 and likewise has a credit rating not below 61 and likewise is audited, so it has an escrow account. No. 3 While the given borrower has a debt ratio not above 88 and likewise has a risk tier that falls below 85, so it is employed. No. 4 While the given borrower has a cosigner, so it is not overdrawn. No. 5 While the given borrower has a debt ratio not above 88 and likewise has a credit rating that falls below 61 and likewise has collateral, so it is solvent. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given borrower has collateral. Question: Select what holds for Hamid: which option?", "options": ["has an escrow account", "is solvent", "is prequalified", "is employed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prequalified", "unit_id": "u011500", "pair_id": "u011500-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011500-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ce39b77ac1a0985a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a2", "a7", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011526-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kochab has a milestone total of 9. Kochab is not preregistered. Kochab has no postdoc. Kochab has a citation index of 36. Kochab is renewed. Kochab has no industry backing. Kochab is not cofunded.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is not shortlisted, it thereby has ethics clearance. Point B. If said proposal is resubmitted, it thereby is not shortlisted. Point C. If said proposal is not peer reviewed, it thereby is a pilot study. Point D. If said proposal has a postdoc, it thereby is resubmitted. Point E. If said proposal is resubmitted, it thereby is not exploratory. Point F. If said proposal has a citation index of maximum 71, it thereby is not resubmitted. Point G. If said proposal is not cofunded, it thereby is not a pilot study. Point H. If said proposal is not longitudinal, it thereby is exploratory. Point I. If said proposal is not renewed, it thereby is not endorsed. Point J. If said proposal has a milestone total of maximum 27, it thereby is peer reviewed. Point K. If said proposal is cofunded, it thereby is longitudinal. Point L. If said proposal is peer reviewed, it thereby is not longitudinal. Point C is cancelled if said proposal has industry backing. Point E supersedes Point H. Point G supersedes Point C. Point D supersedes Point F. Point L supersedes Point K. Question: Which choice is true for Kochab?", "options": ["has ethics clearance", "is exploratory"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is exploratory", "unit_id": "u011526", "pair_id": "u011526-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011526-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0e4bb44a329dbc2c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a4"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u011526-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kochab has a milestone total of 9. Kochab is not preregistered. Kochab has no postdoc. Kochab has a citation index of 36. Kochab is renewed. Kochab has no industry backing. Kochab is not cofunded.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is not shortlisted, it thereby has ethics clearance. Point B. If said proposal is resubmitted, it thereby is not shortlisted. Point C. If said proposal is not peer reviewed, it thereby is a pilot study. Point D. If said proposal has a postdoc, it thereby is resubmitted. Point E. If said proposal is resubmitted, it thereby is not exploratory. Point F. If said proposal has a citation index in excess of 71, it thereby is not resubmitted. Point G. If said proposal is not cofunded, it thereby is not a pilot study. Point H. If said proposal is not longitudinal, it thereby is exploratory. Point I. If said proposal is not renewed, it thereby is not endorsed. Point J. If said proposal has a milestone total of maximum 27, it thereby is peer reviewed. Point K. If said proposal is cofunded, it thereby is longitudinal. Point L. If said proposal is peer reviewed, it thereby is not longitudinal. Point C is cancelled if said proposal has industry backing. Point E supersedes Point H. Point G supersedes Point C. Point D supersedes Point F. Point L supersedes Point K. Question: Which choice is true for Kochab?", "options": ["has ethics clearance", "is exploratory"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is exploratory", "unit_id": "u011526", "pair_id": "u011526-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011526-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b42f02582c603a70", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a4"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u011526-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kochab has a milestone total of 9. Kochab is not preregistered. Kochab has no postdoc. Kochab has a citation index of 36. Kochab is renewed. Kochab has no industry backing. Kochab is not cofunded.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is not shortlisted, so it has ethics clearance. No. 2 While the given proposal is resubmitted, so it is not shortlisted. No. 3 While the given proposal is not peer reviewed, so it is a pilot study. No. 4 While the given proposal has a postdoc, so it is resubmitted. No. 5 While the given proposal is resubmitted, so it is not exploratory. No. 6 While the given proposal has a citation index not above 71, so it is not resubmitted. No. 7 While the given proposal is not cofunded, so it is not a pilot study. No. 8 While the given proposal is not longitudinal, so it is exploratory. No. 9 While the given proposal is not renewed, so it is not endorsed. No. 10 While the given proposal has a milestone total not above 27, so it is peer reviewed. No. 11 While the given proposal is cofunded, so it is longitudinal. No. 12 While the given proposal is peer reviewed, so it is not longitudinal. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given proposal has industry backing. No. 5 wins over No. 8. No. 7 wins over No. 3. No. 4 wins over No. 6. No. 12 wins over No. 11. Question: Select what holds for Kochab: which option?", "options": ["has ethics clearance", "is exploratory"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is exploratory", "unit_id": "u011526", "pair_id": "u011526-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011526-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0e4bb44a329dbc2c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a4"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u011526-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kochab has a milestone total of 9. Kochab is not preregistered. Kochab has no postdoc. Kochab has a citation index of 36. Kochab is renewed. Kochab has no industry backing. Kochab is not cofunded.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is not shortlisted, so it has ethics clearance. No. 2 While the given proposal is resubmitted, so it is not shortlisted. No. 3 While the given proposal is not peer reviewed, so it is a pilot study. No. 4 While the given proposal has a postdoc, so it is resubmitted. No. 5 While the given proposal is resubmitted, so it is not exploratory. No. 6 While the given proposal has a citation index that exceeds 71, so it is not resubmitted. No. 7 While the given proposal is not cofunded, so it is not a pilot study. No. 8 While the given proposal is not longitudinal, so it is exploratory. No. 9 While the given proposal is not renewed, so it is not endorsed. No. 10 While the given proposal has a milestone total not above 27, so it is peer reviewed. No. 11 While the given proposal is cofunded, so it is longitudinal. No. 12 While the given proposal is peer reviewed, so it is not longitudinal. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given proposal has industry backing. No. 5 wins over No. 8. No. 7 wins over No. 3. No. 4 wins over No. 6. No. 12 wins over No. 11. Question: Select what holds for Kochab: which option?", "options": ["has ethics clearance", "is exploratory"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is exploratory", "unit_id": "u011526", "pair_id": "u011526-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011526-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b42f02582c603a70", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a4"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u011536-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel is not admitted. Dorian has a fever reading of 80. Xenia has a fever reading of 25. Aurel is not allergic. Dorian is not allergic. Dorian is not admitted. Xenia is allergic.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is allergic: then it has a chaperone. Policy I is waived if that patient has a fever reading higher than 28. Question: Is it so that Xenia is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011536", "pair_id": "u011536-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011536-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "df8e3f2e63a7a801", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011536-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel is not admitted. Dorian has a fever reading of 80. Xenia has a fever reading of 25. Xenia is admitted. Aurel is not allergic. Dorian is not allergic. Dorian is not admitted. Xenia is allergic.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is allergic: then it has a chaperone. Policy I is waived if that patient has a fever reading higher than 28. Question: Is it so that Xenia is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011536", "pair_id": "u011536-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011536-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3e3a49a3a8193de9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011541-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile is not palletized. Odile is not damaged. Odile has a weight class of 37. Kaveh has a weight class of 48. Nandor has a postal zone of 12. Kaveh is not damaged. Kaveh has a postal zone of 81.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel has a postal zone of 33 or more, it also is not misrouted. Clause 2: once any parcel is not damaged, it also is not registered. Clause 3: once any parcel has a weight class of 63 or more, it also is not prepaid. Clause 4: once any parcel has a postal zone of 80 or less, it also is misrouted. Clause 5: once any parcel has a postal zone over 68, it also is prepaid. Clause 2 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel has a postal zone of 77 or less. Clause 3 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is not damaged. Clause 1 overrides Clause 4. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Kaveh is palletized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011541", "pair_id": "u011541-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011541-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "dcefec81e371345e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011541-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile is not palletized. Odile is not damaged. Odile has a weight class of 37. Kaveh has a weight class of 48. Nandor has a postal zone of 12. Kaveh is not damaged. Kaveh is not palletized. Kaveh has a postal zone of 81.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel has a postal zone of 33 or more, it also is not misrouted. Clause 2: once any parcel is not damaged, it also is not registered. Clause 3: once any parcel has a weight class of 63 or more, it also is not prepaid. Clause 4: once any parcel has a postal zone of 80 or less, it also is misrouted. Clause 5: once any parcel has a postal zone over 68, it also is prepaid. Clause 2 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel has a postal zone of 77 or less. Clause 3 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is not damaged. Clause 1 overrides Clause 4. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Kaveh is palletized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011541", "pair_id": "u011541-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011541-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "93d7b5ed269b823c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011549-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is not isolated. Cobalt has no public endpoint.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is isolated, that workload is mirrored. Item B. When the workload is not mirrored, that workload is monitored. Item C. When the workload has a snapshot, that workload is not mirrored. Item D. When the workload has a public endpoint, that workload is containerized. Question: Can one infer that Cobalt is mirrored?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011549", "pair_id": "u011549-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011549-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "8c07dc04112088b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u011549-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is not isolated. Cobalt has no public endpoint.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is isolated, that workload is mirrored. Item B. When the workload is not mirrored, that workload is monitored. Item C. When the workload has a snapshot, that workload is not mirrored. Item D. When the workload has no public endpoint, that workload is containerized. Question: Can one infer that Cobalt is mirrored?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011549", "pair_id": "u011549-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011549-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "874030336edd3de5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u011553-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is bundled. Viggo is not bundled. Viggo is not disputed. Viggo has a premium band of 79. Viggo is not a smoker. Bruno has a premium band of 80.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is disputed, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 2 While the given policyholder has no roadside assistance, so it has no deductible waiver. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not grandfathered, so it is not litigated. No. 4 While the given policyholder is not grandfathered, so it is litigated. No. 5 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it has a premium discount. No. 6 While the given policyholder has a premium band not below 79, so it is not grandfathered. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not bundled. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is bundled. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not bundled. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is bundled. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a premium band not above 48. No. 4 wins over No. 3. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Viggo is not litigated\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011553", "pair_id": "u011553-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011553-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bbc25eb74c8b6909", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u011553-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is bundled. Viggo is not bundled. Viggo is not disputed. Viggo has a premium band of 79. Viggo has no roadside assistance. Viggo is not a smoker. Bruno has a premium band of 80.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is disputed, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 2 While the given policyholder has no roadside assistance, so it has no deductible waiver. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not grandfathered, so it is not litigated. No. 4 While the given policyholder is not grandfathered, so it is litigated. No. 5 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it has a premium discount. No. 6 While the given policyholder has a premium band not below 79, so it is not grandfathered. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not bundled. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is bundled. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not bundled. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is bundled. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a premium band not above 48. No. 4 wins over No. 3. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Viggo is not litigated\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011553", "pair_id": "u011553-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011553-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "80566d14d9173b83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u011606-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aurel has a mobility rank of 99. Aurel is triaged. Elif is triaged. Aurel is asthmatic.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is asthmatic, thus it is vaccinated. Provision 2: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 3: when the patient here is triaged, thus it is pregnant. Provision 4: when the patient here is anemic, thus it has a chaperone. Provision 5: when the patient here is sedated, thus it is anemic. Provision 6: when the patient here is waitlisted, thus it has an interpreter. Provision 7: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 79, thus it is sedated. Provision 8: when the patient here is triaged, thus it is not diabetic. Provision 4 has no effect when the patient here is triaged. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here has a mobility rank beneath 73. Provision 8 has no effect when the patient here has a mobility rank beneath 83. Question: Which one describes Aurel?", "options": ["has a chaperone", "has an interpreter"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has an interpreter", "unit_id": "u011606", "pair_id": "u011606-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011606-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "04cb9ac0b9b73d33", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011606-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aurel has a mobility rank of 99. Aurel is not triaged. Elif is triaged. Aurel is asthmatic.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is asthmatic, thus it is vaccinated. Provision 2: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 3: when the patient here is triaged, thus it is pregnant. Provision 4: when the patient here is anemic, thus it has a chaperone. Provision 5: when the patient here is sedated, thus it is anemic. Provision 6: when the patient here is waitlisted, thus it has an interpreter. Provision 7: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 79, thus it is sedated. Provision 8: when the patient here is triaged, thus it is not diabetic. Provision 4 has no effect when the patient here is triaged. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here has a mobility rank beneath 73. Provision 8 has no effect when the patient here has a mobility rank beneath 83. Question: Which one describes Aurel?", "options": ["has a chaperone", "has an interpreter"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a chaperone", "unit_id": "u011606", "pair_id": "u011606-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011606-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cf4cb0f9035bba46", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011673-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno has a CPU quota of 10. Juno has a latency budget of 47. Juno has a GPU.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is autoscaled, that workload is not patched. Item B. When the workload is monitored, that workload is autoscaled. Item C. When the workload has a GPU, that workload is not deprecated. Item D. When the workload is autoscaled, that workload is patched. Item D is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of no more than 33. Item B is suspended when the workload has a replica count of no more than 21. Item A is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of more than 33. Question: Can one infer that Juno is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011673", "pair_id": "u011673-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011673-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6710fd743d1a9158", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u011673-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno has a CPU quota of 10. Juno has a latency budget of 47. Juno has a GPU.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is autoscaled, that workload is not patched. Item B. When the workload is monitored, that workload is autoscaled. Item C. When the workload has a CPU quota of no more than 52, that workload is monitored. Item D. When the workload has a GPU, that workload is not deprecated. Item E. When the workload is autoscaled, that workload is patched. Item E is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of no more than 33. Item B is suspended when the workload has a replica count of no more than 21. Item A is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of more than 33. Question: Can one infer that Juno is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011673", "pair_id": "u011673-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011673-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a34bfe326f72033f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u011694-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kestrel has a replica count of 24. Kestrel is deprecated. Kestrel is not idle. Kestrel has a latency budget of 68. Kestrel is not containerized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a latency budget of maximum 67, it thereby is virtualized. Point B. If said workload is idle, it thereby is not patched. Point C. If said workload has a replica count of minimum 38, it thereby has a snapshot. Point D. If said workload has a latency budget of minimum 41, it thereby has no snapshot. Point E. If said workload is idle, it thereby is not virtualized. Point F. If said workload has a latency budget in excess of 67, it thereby has a GPU. Point G. If said workload is containerized, it thereby is patched. Point H. If said workload is deprecated, it thereby has no GPU. Point I. If said workload is virtualized, it thereby is replicated. Point J. If said workload has a GPU, it thereby is backed up. Point K. If said workload has a GPU, it thereby is provisioned. Point F supersedes Point H. Point D supersedes Point C. Point B supersedes Point G. Point A supersedes Point E. Question: Which choice is true for Kestrel?", "options": ["is replicated", "is provisioned"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is provisioned", "unit_id": "u011694", "pair_id": "u011694-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011694-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6a7472f578c8ee0f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a1"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u011694-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kestrel has a replica count of 24. Kestrel is deprecated. Kestrel is not idle. Kestrel has a latency budget of 43. Kestrel is not containerized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a latency budget of maximum 67, it thereby is virtualized. Point B. If said workload is idle, it thereby is not patched. Point C. If said workload has a replica count of minimum 38, it thereby has a snapshot. Point D. If said workload has a latency budget of minimum 41, it thereby has no snapshot. Point E. If said workload is idle, it thereby is not virtualized. Point F. If said workload has a latency budget in excess of 67, it thereby has a GPU. Point G. If said workload is containerized, it thereby is patched. Point H. If said workload is deprecated, it thereby has no GPU. Point I. If said workload is virtualized, it thereby is replicated. Point J. If said workload has a GPU, it thereby is backed up. Point K. If said workload has a GPU, it thereby is provisioned. Point F supersedes Point H. Point D supersedes Point C. Point B supersedes Point G. Point A supersedes Point E. Question: Which choice is true for Kestrel?", "options": ["is replicated", "is provisioned"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is replicated", "unit_id": "u011694", "pair_id": "u011694-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011694-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "920bc25a3d183577", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a1"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u011694-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kestrel has a replica count of 24. Kestrel is deprecated. Kestrel is not idle. Kestrel has a latency budget of 68. Kestrel is not containerized.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a latency budget not above 67, so it is virtualized. No. 2 While the given workload is idle, so it is not patched. No. 3 While the given workload has a replica count not below 38, so it has a snapshot. No. 4 While the given workload has a latency budget not below 41, so it has no snapshot. No. 5 While the given workload is idle, so it is not virtualized. No. 6 While the given workload has a latency budget that exceeds 67, so it has a GPU. No. 7 While the given workload is containerized, so it is patched. No. 8 While the given workload is deprecated, so it has no GPU. No. 9 While the given workload is virtualized, so it is replicated. No. 10 While the given workload has a GPU, so it is backed up. No. 11 While the given workload has a GPU, so it is provisioned. No. 6 wins over No. 8. No. 4 wins over No. 3. No. 2 wins over No. 7. No. 1 wins over No. 5. Question: Select what holds for Kestrel: which option?", "options": ["is replicated", "is provisioned"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is provisioned", "unit_id": "u011694", "pair_id": "u011694-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011694-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6a7472f578c8ee0f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a1"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u011694-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kestrel has a replica count of 24. Kestrel is deprecated. Kestrel is not idle. Kestrel has a latency budget of 43. Kestrel is not containerized.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a latency budget not above 67, so it is virtualized. No. 2 While the given workload is idle, so it is not patched. No. 3 While the given workload has a replica count not below 38, so it has a snapshot. No. 4 While the given workload has a latency budget not below 41, so it has no snapshot. No. 5 While the given workload is idle, so it is not virtualized. No. 6 While the given workload has a latency budget that exceeds 67, so it has a GPU. No. 7 While the given workload is containerized, so it is patched. No. 8 While the given workload is deprecated, so it has no GPU. No. 9 While the given workload is virtualized, so it is replicated. No. 10 While the given workload has a GPU, so it is backed up. No. 11 While the given workload has a GPU, so it is provisioned. No. 6 wins over No. 8. No. 4 wins over No. 3. No. 2 wins over No. 7. No. 1 wins over No. 5. Question: Select what holds for Kestrel: which option?", "options": ["is replicated", "is provisioned"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is replicated", "unit_id": "u011694", "pair_id": "u011694-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011694-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "920bc25a3d183577", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a1"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u011697-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar is not merged. Feldspar is not reverted. Feldspar is not tagged. Feldspar is profiled. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is not linted. Feldspar has a patch cycle of 31. Feldspar is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is notarized and also is not merged and also has a patch cycle of 45 or less, it also is tested. Clause 2: once any build is profiled and also has a patch cycle under 18, it also is reproducible. Clause 3: once any build is profiled and also has a patch cycle of 18 or more and also is tagged, it also is not reproducible. Clause 4: once any build is reverted, it also is not tested. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build is reverted and also is tagged. Clause 1 does not hold for a build when any build has a patch cycle over 41. Clause 2 does not hold for a build when any build is tagged and also is linted. Clause 1 overrides Clause 4. Clause 2 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Feldspar is reproducible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011697", "pair_id": "u011697-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011697-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4bb7e6885d2a8fb9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u011697-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar is not merged. Feldspar is not reverted. Feldspar is not tagged. Feldspar is profiled. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is not linted. Feldspar has a patch cycle of 31. Feldspar is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is notarized and also is merged and also has a patch cycle of 45 or less, it also is tested. Clause 2: once any build is profiled and also has a patch cycle under 18, it also is reproducible. Clause 3: once any build is profiled and also has a patch cycle of 18 or more and also is tagged, it also is not reproducible. Clause 4: once any build is reverted, it also is not tested. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build is reverted and also is tagged. Clause 1 does not hold for a build when any build has a patch cycle over 41. Clause 2 does not hold for a build when any build is tagged and also is linted. Clause 1 overrides Clause 4. Clause 2 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Feldspar is reproducible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011697", "pair_id": "u011697-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011697-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "78da4594d53e720b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u011697-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar is not merged. Feldspar is not reverted. Feldspar is not tagged. Feldspar is profiled. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is not linted. Feldspar has a patch cycle of 31. Feldspar is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is notarized, and is not merged, and has a patch cycle of no more than 45, that build is tested. Item B. When the build is profiled, and has a patch cycle of less than 18, that build is reproducible. Item C. When the build is profiled, and has a patch cycle of no less than 18, and is tagged, that build is not reproducible. Item D. When the build is reverted, that build is not tested. Item C is suspended when the build is reverted, and is tagged. Item A is suspended when the build has a patch cycle of more than 41. Item B is suspended when the build is tagged, and is linted. Item A outranks Item D. Item B outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Feldspar is reproducible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011697", "pair_id": "u011697-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011697-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4bb7e6885d2a8fb9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u011697-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar is not merged. Feldspar is not reverted. Feldspar is not tagged. Feldspar is profiled. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is not linted. Feldspar has a patch cycle of 31. Feldspar is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is notarized, and is merged, and has a patch cycle of no more than 45, that build is tested. Item B. When the build is profiled, and has a patch cycle of less than 18, that build is reproducible. Item C. When the build is profiled, and has a patch cycle of no less than 18, and is tagged, that build is not reproducible. Item D. When the build is reverted, that build is not tested. Item C is suspended when the build is reverted, and is tagged. Item A is suspended when the build has a patch cycle of more than 41. Item B is suspended when the build is tagged, and is linted. Item A outranks Item D. Item B outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Feldspar is reproducible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011697", "pair_id": "u011697-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011697-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "78da4594d53e720b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u011699-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is oversized. Priya is fragile. Kaveh is not misrouted. Jory is not oversized. Jory is labeled. Kaveh is fragile. Priya is not misrouted. Nandor is labeled. Nandor is misrouted. Priya is not damaged.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is damaged, so it is registered. No. 2 While the given parcel is damaged, so it is not delayed. No. 3 While the given parcel is not misrouted, so it is delayed. No. 4 While the given parcel is delayed, so it is not stamped. No. 5 While the given parcel is fragile, so it is not registered. No. 6 While the given parcel is misrouted, so it is consolidated. No. 7 While the given parcel is delayed, so it is stamped. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given parcel is labeled. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given parcel is oversized. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given parcel is labeled. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given parcel is oversized. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given parcel is labeled. No. 4 wins over No. 7. No. 5 wins over No. 1. No. 2 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Priya is stamped\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011699", "pair_id": "u011699-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011699-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5cfecbd11d7c2699", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 18}}
{"id": "syn-u011699-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is oversized. Priya is fragile. Kaveh is not misrouted. Jory is not oversized. Jory is labeled. Kaveh is fragile. Priya is not misrouted. Nandor is labeled. Nandor is misrouted. Priya is not damaged.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is damaged, so it is registered. No. 2 While the given parcel is damaged, so it is not delayed. No. 3 While the given parcel is misrouted, so it is delayed. No. 4 While the given parcel is delayed, so it is not stamped. No. 5 While the given parcel is fragile, so it is not registered. No. 6 While the given parcel is misrouted, so it is consolidated. No. 7 While the given parcel is delayed, so it is stamped. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given parcel is labeled. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given parcel is oversized. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given parcel is labeled. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given parcel is oversized. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given parcel is labeled. No. 4 wins over No. 7. No. 5 wins over No. 1. No. 2 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Priya is stamped\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011699", "pair_id": "u011699-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011699-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "742268c548114e1c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 18}}
{"id": "syn-u011731-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is headhunted. Sigrid is bonded. Lotte is seasoned. Lotte is bonded. Sigrid is seasoned. Sigrid is headhunted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is bonded, it then is freelance. #2 Each time a candidate is not headhunted, it then is interviewed. Question: Do the terms above show that Sigrid is not interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011731", "pair_id": "u011731-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011731-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "9af477c01c8e3e3f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011731-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is headhunted. Sigrid is bonded. Lotte is seasoned. Lotte is bonded. Sigrid is seasoned. Sigrid is headhunted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is bonded, it then is freelance. #2 Each time a candidate is not headhunted, it then is interviewed. #3 Each time a candidate is seasoned, it then is not interviewed. Question: Do the terms above show that Sigrid is not interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011731", "pair_id": "u011731-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011731-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "d22cfcaea456ba16", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011760-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is uninsurable. Bruno is not subrogated. Bruno is uninsurable. Bruno is appraised. Bruno has no roadside assistance. Edda is not retired. Bruno is reimbursed. Wanda has no adjuster. Wanda has no roadside assistance. Xaver is reinstated. Xaver is not appraised. Wanda is not subrogated. Bruno is reinstated. Edda has roadside assistance. Bruno is not retired. Wanda is not uninsurable. Wanda is retired. Bruno has an adjuster. Xaver is not subrogated. Xaver is retired.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is reimbursed and also is uninsurable and also is not retired, it also is not lapsed. Clause 2: once any policyholder is covered and also has an adjuster and also is uninsurable, it also is not disputed. Clause 3: once any policyholder is appraised and also is reinstated and also is uninsurable, it also is covered. Clause 4: once any policyholder is covered and also has roadside assistance and also has a rider, it also is disputed. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is subrogated. Question: Does it follow that Bruno is disputed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011760", "pair_id": "u011760-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/2/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011760-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6bfe9f0085366555", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011760-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is uninsurable. Bruno is not subrogated. Bruno is uninsurable. Bruno is appraised. Bruno has no roadside assistance. Edda is not retired. Bruno is reimbursed. Wanda has no adjuster. Wanda has no roadside assistance. Xaver is reinstated. Xaver is not appraised. Wanda is not subrogated. Bruno is reinstated. Edda has roadside assistance. Bruno is not retired. Wanda is not uninsurable. Wanda is retired. Bruno has an adjuster. Xaver is not subrogated. Xaver is retired.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is reimbursed and also is uninsurable and also is retired, it also is not lapsed. Clause 2: once any policyholder is covered and also has an adjuster and also is uninsurable, it also is not disputed. Clause 3: once any policyholder is appraised and also is reinstated and also is uninsurable, it also is covered. Clause 4: once any policyholder is covered and also has roadside assistance and also has a rider, it also is disputed. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is subrogated. Question: Does it follow that Bruno is disputed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011760", "pair_id": "u011760-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/2/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011760-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a8615f721ebf32a4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011794-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke is foreclosed. Wiebke is indebted. Dagny is foreclosed. Wiebke is bankrupt. Anouk is not vetted. Anouk is bankrupt. Anouk is not audited. Anouk is overdrawn. Wiebke is not vetted. Wiebke is not overdrawn. Wiebke is audited. Dagny is not vetted. Dagny is indebted. Dagny is not bankrupt. Anouk is indebted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no mortgage provided that it is bankrupt. Section 2: a borrower is not garnished provided that it is vetted as well as is bankrupt as well as is indebted. Section 3: a borrower has no guarantor provided that it is bankrupt as well as is overdrawn as well as is not indebted. Section 4: a borrower has a guarantor provided that it is bankrupt as well as is audited as well as is foreclosed. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it is audited. Section 4 lapses for a borrower if it is indebted as well as is overdrawn. Question: Anouk has a guarantor. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011794", "pair_id": "u011794-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011794-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4d07a520ea6f2049", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u011794-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke is foreclosed. Wiebke is indebted. Dagny is foreclosed. Wiebke is bankrupt. Anouk is not vetted. Anouk is bankrupt. Anouk is not audited. Anouk is overdrawn. Wiebke is not vetted. Wiebke is not overdrawn. Wiebke is audited. Dagny is not vetted. Dagny is indebted. Dagny is not bankrupt. Anouk is indebted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no mortgage provided that it is bankrupt. Section 2: a borrower is not garnished provided that it is vetted as well as is bankrupt as well as is indebted. Section 3: a borrower has no guarantor provided that it is bankrupt as well as is overdrawn as well as is indebted. Section 4: a borrower has a guarantor provided that it is bankrupt as well as is audited as well as is foreclosed. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it is audited. Section 4 lapses for a borrower if it is indebted as well as is overdrawn. Question: Anouk has a guarantor. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011794", "pair_id": "u011794-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011794-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "58b16879bdd076c7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u011794-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke is foreclosed. Wiebke is indebted. Dagny is foreclosed. Wiebke is bankrupt. Anouk is not vetted. Anouk is bankrupt. Anouk is not audited. Anouk is overdrawn. Wiebke is not vetted. Wiebke is not overdrawn. Wiebke is audited. Dagny is not vetted. Dagny is indebted. Dagny is not bankrupt. Anouk is indebted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then has no mortgage. #2 Each time a borrower is vetted and additionally is bankrupt and additionally is indebted, it then is not garnished. #3 Each time a borrower is bankrupt and additionally is overdrawn and additionally is not indebted, it then has no guarantor. #4 Each time a borrower is bankrupt and additionally is audited and additionally is foreclosed, it then has a guarantor. #3 is set aside if a borrower is audited. #4 is set aside if a borrower is indebted and additionally is overdrawn. Question: Do the terms above show that Anouk has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u011794", "pair_id": "u011794-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011794-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4d07a520ea6f2049", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u011794-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke is foreclosed. Wiebke is indebted. Dagny is foreclosed. Wiebke is bankrupt. Anouk is not vetted. Anouk is bankrupt. Anouk is not audited. Anouk is overdrawn. Wiebke is not vetted. Wiebke is not overdrawn. Wiebke is audited. Dagny is not vetted. Dagny is indebted. Dagny is not bankrupt. Anouk is indebted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then has no mortgage. #2 Each time a borrower is vetted and additionally is bankrupt and additionally is indebted, it then is not garnished. #3 Each time a borrower is bankrupt and additionally is overdrawn and additionally is indebted, it then has no guarantor. #4 Each time a borrower is bankrupt and additionally is audited and additionally is foreclosed, it then has a guarantor. #3 is set aside if a borrower is audited. #4 is set aside if a borrower is indebted and additionally is overdrawn. Question: Do the terms above show that Anouk has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011794", "pair_id": "u011794-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011794-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "58b16879bdd076c7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u011874-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is not damaged. Ulla is not damaged. Ulla is undeliverable. Quentin is undeliverable. Quentin has a delivery window of 68. Thilo is not undeliverable. Ulla has a delivery window of 65. Thilo has a delivery window of 43. Ulla has a parcel volume of 59.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel has a delivery window of maximum 50, it thereby is perishable. Point B. If said parcel is damaged, it thereby is not oversized. Point C. If said parcel has a waybill, it thereby is hazardous. Point D. If said parcel has a courier, it thereby is oversized. Point E. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby has a courier. Point F. If said parcel is undeliverable, it thereby is palletized. Point G. If said parcel has a parcel volume of minimum 44, it thereby is refrigerated. Point H. If said parcel has a parcel volume short of 44, it thereby has a waybill. Point I. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby is weighed. Point D supersedes Point B. Question: Which choice is true for Ulla?", "options": ["is weighed", "is oversized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is oversized", "unit_id": "u011874", "pair_id": "u011874-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011874-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cf325bf5db099e0e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a9", "a8"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u011874-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is not damaged. Ulla is not damaged. Ulla is undeliverable. Quentin is undeliverable. Quentin has a delivery window of 68. Thilo is not undeliverable. Ulla has a delivery window of 32. Thilo has a delivery window of 43. Ulla has a parcel volume of 59.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel has a delivery window of maximum 50, it thereby is perishable. Point B. If said parcel is damaged, it thereby is not oversized. Point C. If said parcel has a waybill, it thereby is hazardous. Point D. If said parcel has a courier, it thereby is oversized. Point E. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby has a courier. Point F. If said parcel is undeliverable, it thereby is palletized. Point G. If said parcel has a parcel volume of minimum 44, it thereby is refrigerated. Point H. If said parcel has a parcel volume short of 44, it thereby has a waybill. Point I. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby is weighed. Point D supersedes Point B. Question: Which choice is true for Ulla?", "options": ["is weighed", "is oversized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is oversized", "unit_id": "u011874", "pair_id": "u011874-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011874-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "579b1a1f481951d8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a9", "a8"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u011886-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is embargoed. Capella is resubmitted. Kochab is embargoed. Kochab is resubmitted. Capella has a team size of 31. Capella is not collaborative. Kochab is collaborative. Aldebaran has a milestone total of 66. Kochab has a review mark of 14. Kochab has a citation index of 31. Aldebaran is embargoed. Kochab has a team size of 74.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is embargoed and likewise has a team size that exceeds 21 and likewise has a milestone total not above 18, so it has a postdoc. No. 2 While the given proposal has a review mark not above 67, so it is not shortlisted. No. 3 While the given proposal is collaborative, so it is not translational. No. 4 While the given proposal is budgeted and likewise has a citation index that falls below 79 and likewise is resubmitted, so it has a field site. No. 5 While the given proposal is collaborative, so it is budgeted. No. 6 While the given proposal is budgeted and likewise has a citation index not below 31, so it has no field site. No. 6 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Kochab has a field site\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011886", "pair_id": "u011886-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011886-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d08d785ebaa8c178", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011886-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is embargoed. Capella is resubmitted. Kochab is embargoed. Kochab is resubmitted. Capella has a team size of 31. Capella is not collaborative. Kochab is collaborative. Aldebaran has a milestone total of 66. Kochab has a review mark of 14. Kochab has a citation index of 31. Aldebaran is embargoed. Kochab has a team size of 74.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is embargoed and likewise has a team size that exceeds 21 and likewise has a milestone total not above 18, so it has a postdoc. No. 2 While the given proposal has a review mark not above 67, so it is not shortlisted. No. 3 While the given proposal is collaborative, so it is not translational. No. 4 While the given proposal is budgeted and likewise has a citation index that falls below 79 and likewise is resubmitted, so it has a field site. No. 5 While the given proposal is collaborative, so it is budgeted. No. 6 While the given proposal is budgeted and likewise has a citation index not below 79, so it has no field site. No. 6 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Kochab has a field site\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011886", "pair_id": "u011886-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011886-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4f7b92cd88d5669c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011902-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is scanned. Rasmus has a courier. Nandor is scanned. Nandor has a parcel volume of 12. Nandor has no courier. Nandor is delayed. Nandor has no waybill.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is not prepaid provided that it is delayed. Section 2: a parcel is fragile provided that it has a parcel volume of 73 or lower. Section 3: a parcel is tracked provided that it is consolidated. Section 4: a parcel is not consolidated provided that it is fragile. Section 5: a parcel is consolidated provided that it is fragile. Section 6: a parcel is prepaid provided that it is scanned. Section 5 lapses for a parcel if it has a courier. Section 4 lapses for a parcel if it is not delayed. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it has a courier. Section 4 lapses for a parcel if it has no courier. Section 6 lapses for a parcel if it is scanned. Section 5 lapses for a parcel if it has a waybill. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 6. Question: Nandor is consolidated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011902", "pair_id": "u011902-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011902-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "889b63193df96dfb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011902-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is scanned. Rasmus has a courier. Nandor is scanned. Nandor has a parcel volume of 12. Nandor has no courier. Nandor is delayed. Nandor has no waybill.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is not prepaid provided that it is not delayed. Section 2: a parcel is fragile provided that it has a parcel volume of 73 or lower. Section 3: a parcel is tracked provided that it is consolidated. Section 4: a parcel is not consolidated provided that it is fragile. Section 5: a parcel is consolidated provided that it is fragile. Section 6: a parcel is prepaid provided that it is scanned. Section 5 lapses for a parcel if it has a courier. Section 4 lapses for a parcel if it is not delayed. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it has a courier. Section 4 lapses for a parcel if it has no courier. Section 6 lapses for a parcel if it is scanned. Section 5 lapses for a parcel if it has a waybill. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 6. Question: Nandor is consolidated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011902", "pair_id": "u011902-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011902-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0ab2e4d39cfbd4a3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011902-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is scanned. Rasmus has a courier. Nandor is scanned. Nandor has a parcel volume of 12. Nandor has no courier. Nandor is delayed. Nandor has no waybill.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it is not prepaid. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume no higher than 73: then it is fragile. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is consolidated: then it is tracked. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is not consolidated. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is consolidated. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is scanned: then it is prepaid. Policy V is waived if that parcel has a courier. Policy IV is waived if that parcel is not delayed. Policy III is waived if that parcel has a courier. Policy IV is waived if that parcel has no courier. Policy VI is waived if that parcel is scanned. Policy V is waived if that parcel has a waybill. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy VI. Question: Is it so that Nandor is consolidated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011902", "pair_id": "u011902-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011902-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "889b63193df96dfb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011902-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is scanned. Rasmus has a courier. Nandor is scanned. Nandor has a parcel volume of 12. Nandor has no courier. Nandor is delayed. Nandor has no waybill.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not delayed: then it is not prepaid. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume no higher than 73: then it is fragile. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is consolidated: then it is tracked. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is not consolidated. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is consolidated. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is scanned: then it is prepaid. Policy V is waived if that parcel has a courier. Policy IV is waived if that parcel is not delayed. Policy III is waived if that parcel has a courier. Policy IV is waived if that parcel has no courier. Policy VI is waived if that parcel is scanned. Policy V is waived if that parcel has a waybill. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy VI. Question: Is it so that Nandor is consolidated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011902", "pair_id": "u011902-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011902-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0ab2e4d39cfbd4a3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011919-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is onboarded. Mads has no background screening. Mads is recommended. Mads is probationary. Mads has a diploma. Mads has a mentor.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is recommended plus has a mentor plus is probationary: then it is unionized. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a diploma plus has a background screening: then it is not headhunted. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is unionized plus is recommended: then it has a visa. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has a visa plus has a background screening: then it is not freelance. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has a visa plus is onboarded plus has a mentor: then it is freelance. Policy II is waived if that candidate is certified. Policy V is waived if that candidate is certified. Question: Is it so that Mads is freelance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011919", "pair_id": "u011919-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011919-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7f4ebc6c5e4a8bec", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011919-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is onboarded. Mads has no background screening. Mads is recommended. Mads is probationary. Mads has no diploma. Mads has a mentor.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is recommended plus has a mentor plus is probationary: then it is unionized. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a diploma plus has a background screening: then it is not headhunted. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is unionized plus is recommended: then it has a visa. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has a visa plus has a background screening: then it is not freelance. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has a visa plus is onboarded plus has a mentor: then it is freelance. Policy II is waived if that candidate is certified. Policy V is waived if that candidate is certified. Question: Is it so that Mads is freelance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011919", "pair_id": "u011919-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011919-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f27b9749aefc219b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011924-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Elif is not referred. Wendel has an interpreter. Wendel is pregnant. Elif has no interpreter. Elif has a pacemaker. Elif is not diabetic. Elif is asthmatic. Elif is not discharged. Elif is pregnant. Wendel has a pacemaker. Elif is allergic.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is vaccinated, it also is not waitlisted. Clause 2: once any patient is ambulatory and also is vaccinated, it also has a caregiver. Clause 3: once any patient is ambulatory and also is referred, it also is admitted. Clause 4: once any patient has a pacemaker, it also is postoperative. Clause 5: once any patient is postoperative, it also is ambulatory. Clause 6: once any patient is ambulatory and also is asthmatic and also is pregnant, it also is waitlisted. Clause 7: once any patient has an interpreter, it also is rescheduled. Clause 8: once any patient is not diabetic, it also is vaccinated. Clause 9: once any patient is diabetic, it also is not vaccinated. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is discharged. Clause 8 overrides Clause 9. Clause 1 overrides Clause 6. Question: Which of these is true of Elif?", "options": ["is admitted", "has a caregiver", "is waitlisted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a caregiver", "unit_id": "u011924", "pair_id": "u011924-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011924-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6406314d43d4958e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a13", "a7"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u011924-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Elif is not referred. Wendel has an interpreter. Wendel is pregnant. Elif has no interpreter. Elif has a pacemaker. Elif is not diabetic. Elif is asthmatic. Elif is not discharged. Elif is pregnant. Wendel has a pacemaker. Elif is allergic.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is vaccinated, it also is not waitlisted. Clause 2: once any patient is ambulatory and also is vaccinated, it also has a caregiver. Clause 3: once any patient is ambulatory and also is referred, it also is admitted. Clause 4: once any patient has a pacemaker, it also is postoperative. Clause 5: once any patient is postoperative, it also is ambulatory. Clause 6: once any patient is ambulatory and also is asthmatic and also is pregnant, it also is waitlisted. Clause 7: once any patient has an interpreter, it also is rescheduled. Clause 8: once any patient is diabetic, it also is vaccinated. Clause 9: once any patient is diabetic, it also is not vaccinated. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is discharged. Clause 8 overrides Clause 9. Clause 1 overrides Clause 6. Question: Which of these is true of Elif?", "options": ["is admitted", "has a caregiver", "is waitlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is waitlisted", "unit_id": "u011924", "pair_id": "u011924-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011924-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e869d31f5e611bd7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a13", "a7"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u011965-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda is lapsed. Wanda is not uninsurable. Wanda is covered. Agata is not uninsurable. Agata is not indemnified. Agata is not covered.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is a claimant. Clause 2: once any policyholder is not reinstated, it also is a smoker. Clause 3: once any policyholder is uninsurable, it also has no deductible waiver. Clause 4: once any policyholder is covered, it also has a deductible waiver. Clause 5: once any policyholder is not covered, it also has no adjuster. Clause 6: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also is not reinstated. Clause 7: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also is appraised. Clause 8: once any policyholder has no roadside assistance, it also has a rider. Clause 9: once any policyholder has no premium discount, it also has no roadside assistance. Clause 10: once any policyholder has no adjuster, it also is bundled. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is not indemnified. Clause 3 overrides Clause 4. Question: Which of these is true of Wanda?", "options": ["is bundled", "has a rider", "is a smoker", "is appraised"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is appraised", "unit_id": "u011965", "pair_id": "u011965-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011965-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c31e57da9b89ca50", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a9", "a12", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011965-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda is not lapsed. Wanda is not uninsurable. Wanda is covered. Agata is not uninsurable. Agata is not indemnified. Agata is not covered.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is a claimant. Clause 2: once any policyholder is not reinstated, it also is a smoker. Clause 3: once any policyholder is uninsurable, it also has no deductible waiver. Clause 4: once any policyholder is covered, it also has a deductible waiver. Clause 5: once any policyholder is not covered, it also has no adjuster. Clause 6: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also is not reinstated. Clause 7: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also is appraised. Clause 8: once any policyholder has no roadside assistance, it also has a rider. Clause 9: once any policyholder has no premium discount, it also has no roadside assistance. Clause 10: once any policyholder has no adjuster, it also is bundled. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is not indemnified. Clause 3 overrides Clause 4. Question: Which of these is true of Wanda?", "options": ["is bundled", "has a rider", "is a smoker", "is appraised"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is appraised", "unit_id": "u011965", "pair_id": "u011965-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u011965-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3c2b42ff684e3519", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a9", "a12", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u011999-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is fuzzed. Talc has a test yield of 44. Shale is profiled. Shale is signed. Pumice is not fuzzed. Pumice has a lint backlog of 89. Pumice is not profiled. Quartz has a test yield of 16. Quartz is not profiled. Quartz is not backported. Shale has a lint backlog of 44. Pumice is backported. Talc is not fuzzed. Shale is not backported.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is profiled, then it is merged. (2) If a build is tested, then it is not notarized. (3) If a build is reverted, then it has a changelog. (4) If a build has a lint backlog of at most 63, then it is tested. (5) If a build has a changelog, then it is not flaky. (6) If a build has a test yield of at least 33, then it is not minified. (7) If a build is signed, then it is reverted. (8) If a build is fuzzed, then it is not merged. (9) If a build is minified, then it is notarized. (10) If a build is notarized, then it is flaky. (11) If a build is not backported, then it is minified. When (10) and (5) clash, (10) prevails. When (9) and (2) clash, (9) prevails. When (1) and (8) clash, (1) prevails. When (6) and (11) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Shale is flaky?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011999", "pair_id": "u011999-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/10/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011999-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a760619223304f99", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u011999-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is fuzzed. Talc has a test yield of 44. Shale is profiled. Shale is signed. Pumice is not fuzzed. Pumice has a lint backlog of 89. Pumice is not profiled. Quartz has a test yield of 16. Quartz is not profiled. Quartz is not backported. Shale has a lint backlog of 44. Pumice is backported. Talc is not fuzzed. Shale is not backported.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is profiled, then it is merged. (2) If a build is tested, then it is not notarized. (3) If a build is reverted, then it has a changelog. (4) If a build has a lint backlog of at most 63, then it is tested. (5) If a build has a changelog, then it is not flaky. (6) If a build has a test yield of at least 33, then it is not minified. (7) If a build is signed, then it is reverted. (8) If a build is fuzzed, then it is not merged. (9) If a build is minified, then it is notarized. (10) If a build is notarized, then it is flaky. (11) If a build is backported, then it is minified. When (10) and (5) clash, (10) prevails. When (9) and (2) clash, (9) prevails. When (1) and (8) clash, (1) prevails. When (6) and (11) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Shale is flaky?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011999", "pair_id": "u011999-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/10/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011999-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "150a93daa50de26a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u011999-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is fuzzed. Talc has a test yield of 44. Shale is profiled. Shale is signed. Pumice is not fuzzed. Pumice has a lint backlog of 89. Pumice is not profiled. Quartz has a test yield of 16. Quartz is not profiled. Quartz is not backported. Shale has a lint backlog of 44. Pumice is backported. Talc is not fuzzed. Shale is not backported.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is profiled, that build is merged. Item B. When the build is tested, that build is not notarized. Item C. When the build is reverted, that build has a changelog. Item D. When the build has a lint backlog of no more than 63, that build is tested. Item E. When the build has a changelog, that build is not flaky. Item F. When the build has a test yield of no less than 33, that build is not minified. Item G. When the build is signed, that build is reverted. Item H. When the build is fuzzed, that build is not merged. Item I. When the build is minified, that build is notarized. Item J. When the build is notarized, that build is flaky. Item K. When the build is not backported, that build is minified. Item J outranks Item E. Item I outranks Item B. Item A outranks Item H. Item F outranks Item K. Question: Can one infer that Shale is flaky?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u011999", "pair_id": "u011999-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/10/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011999-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a760619223304f99", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u011999-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is fuzzed. Talc has a test yield of 44. Shale is profiled. Shale is signed. Pumice is not fuzzed. Pumice has a lint backlog of 89. Pumice is not profiled. Quartz has a test yield of 16. Quartz is not profiled. Quartz is not backported. Shale has a lint backlog of 44. Pumice is backported. Talc is not fuzzed. Shale is not backported.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is profiled, that build is merged. Item B. When the build is tested, that build is not notarized. Item C. When the build is reverted, that build has a changelog. Item D. When the build has a lint backlog of no more than 63, that build is tested. Item E. When the build has a changelog, that build is not flaky. Item F. When the build has a test yield of no less than 33, that build is not minified. Item G. When the build is signed, that build is reverted. Item H. When the build is fuzzed, that build is not merged. Item I. When the build is minified, that build is notarized. Item J. When the build is notarized, that build is flaky. Item K. When the build is backported, that build is minified. Item J outranks Item E. Item I outranks Item B. Item A outranks Item H. Item F outranks Item K. Question: Can one infer that Shale is flaky?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u011999", "pair_id": "u011999-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/10/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u011999-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "150a93daa50de26a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u012121-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not bedridden. Gunnar is not fasting. Gunnar has no chaperone. Florin is fasting. Benedek is fasting. Benedek has no chaperone. Florin has a pacemaker. Florin has a mobility rank of 28. Benedek is not bedridden. Gunnar is not symptomatic. Benedek has a mobility rank of 47. Benedek is symptomatic. Florin has no chaperone. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 99.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is not hypertensive, thus it is not postoperative. Provision 2: when the patient here has no chaperone, thus it is not sedated. Provision 3: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 4: when the patient here has a mobility rank beneath 33, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 5: when the patient here is bedridden, thus it is not waitlisted. Provision 6: when the patient here is fasting, thus it is not hypertensive. Provision 7: when the patient here is not hypertensive, thus it is postoperative. Provision 8: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is not admitted. Provision 7 has no effect when the patient here is symptomatic. Provision 6 has no effect when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 65. Provision 5 has no effect when the patient here has no pacemaker. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here has no pacemaker. Provision 7 has no effect when the patient here has a pacemaker. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Florin is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012121", "pair_id": "u012121-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012121-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4424cdfac32f27a8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012121-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not bedridden. Gunnar is not fasting. Gunnar has no chaperone. Florin is fasting. Florin is symptomatic. Benedek is fasting. Benedek has no chaperone. Florin has a pacemaker. Florin has a mobility rank of 28. Benedek is not bedridden. Gunnar is not symptomatic. Benedek has a mobility rank of 47. Benedek is symptomatic. Florin has no chaperone. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 99.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is not hypertensive, thus it is not postoperative. Provision 2: when the patient here has no chaperone, thus it is not sedated. Provision 3: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 4: when the patient here has a mobility rank beneath 33, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 5: when the patient here is bedridden, thus it is not waitlisted. Provision 6: when the patient here is fasting, thus it is not hypertensive. Provision 7: when the patient here is not hypertensive, thus it is postoperative. Provision 8: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is not admitted. Provision 7 has no effect when the patient here is symptomatic. Provision 6 has no effect when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 65. Provision 5 has no effect when the patient here has no pacemaker. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here has no pacemaker. Provision 7 has no effect when the patient here has a pacemaker. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Florin is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012121", "pair_id": "u012121-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012121-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cbdfaac93f1bc459", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012121-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not bedridden. Gunnar is not fasting. Gunnar has no chaperone. Florin is fasting. Benedek is fasting. Benedek has no chaperone. Florin has a pacemaker. Florin has a mobility rank of 28. Benedek is not bedridden. Gunnar is not symptomatic. Benedek has a mobility rank of 47. Benedek is symptomatic. Florin has no chaperone. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 99.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is not hypertensive, it thereby is not postoperative. Point B. If said patient has no chaperone, it thereby is not sedated. Point C. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby is waitlisted. Point D. If said patient has a mobility rank short of 33, it thereby is hypertensive. Point E. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is not waitlisted. Point F. If said patient is fasting, it thereby is not hypertensive. Point G. If said patient is not hypertensive, it thereby is postoperative. Point H. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby is not admitted. Point G is cancelled if said patient is symptomatic. Point F is cancelled if said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 65. Point E is cancelled if said patient has no pacemaker. Point A is cancelled if said patient has no pacemaker. Point G is cancelled if said patient has a pacemaker. Point C supersedes Point E. Point G supersedes Point A. Point F supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Florin is postoperative. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012121", "pair_id": "u012121-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012121-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4424cdfac32f27a8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012121-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not bedridden. Gunnar is not fasting. Gunnar has no chaperone. Florin is fasting. Florin is symptomatic. Benedek is fasting. Benedek has no chaperone. Florin has a pacemaker. Florin has a mobility rank of 28. Benedek is not bedridden. Gunnar is not symptomatic. Benedek has a mobility rank of 47. Benedek is symptomatic. Florin has no chaperone. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 99.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is not hypertensive, it thereby is not postoperative. Point B. If said patient has no chaperone, it thereby is not sedated. Point C. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby is waitlisted. Point D. If said patient has a mobility rank short of 33, it thereby is hypertensive. Point E. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is not waitlisted. Point F. If said patient is fasting, it thereby is not hypertensive. Point G. If said patient is not hypertensive, it thereby is postoperative. Point H. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby is not admitted. Point G is cancelled if said patient is symptomatic. Point F is cancelled if said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 65. Point E is cancelled if said patient has no pacemaker. Point A is cancelled if said patient has no pacemaker. Point G is cancelled if said patient has a pacemaker. Point C supersedes Point E. Point G supersedes Point A. Point F supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Florin is postoperative. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012121", "pair_id": "u012121-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012121-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cbdfaac93f1bc459", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012203-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is onboarded. Ivo is not interviewed. Jasna is relocating. Jasna has no signing bonus. Ivo is not freelance. Rune is certified. Lotte is not a veteran. Jasna is not headhunted. Ivo is not relocating. Ivo is not certified. Lotte is not seasoned. Jasna is freelance. Lotte has no signing bonus. Rune is not seasoned. Rune is relocating. Ivo has no signing bonus. Ivo is not a veteran. Rune has no signing bonus. Rune has a visa. Jasna has a visa. Lotte is not freelance. Lotte is not relocating. Ivo is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate has a background screening provided that it is not onboarded. Section 2: a candidate has a diploma provided that it is seasoned. Section 3: a candidate is not bonded provided that it has no diploma as well as is not relocating as well as is interviewed. Section 4: a candidate has no mentor provided that it is headhunted as well as is a veteran. Section 5: a candidate has a mentor provided that it is interviewed. Section 6: a candidate has no diploma provided that it is licensed. Section 7: a candidate is not licensed provided that it has a visa. Section 8: a candidate is bonded provided that it has no diploma as well as is relocating as well as is not certified. Section 9: a candidate is licensed provided that it has a signing bonus. Section 10: a candidate has no background screening provided that it is not freelance. Section 3 lapses for a candidate if it is relocating as well as has a signing bonus. Section 6 lapses for a candidate if it is seasoned as well as is not freelance. Section 1 lapses for a candidate if it has a visa. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Ivo is bonded. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012203", "pair_id": "u012203-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012203-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5bbe65ebafa2c3c4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 31}}
{"id": "syn-u012203-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is onboarded. Ivo is not interviewed. Jasna is relocating. Jasna has no signing bonus. Ivo is not freelance. Rune is certified. Lotte is not a veteran. Jasna is not headhunted. Ivo is not relocating. Ivo is not certified. Lotte is not seasoned. Jasna is freelance. Lotte has no signing bonus. Rune is not seasoned. Rune is relocating. Ivo has no signing bonus. Ivo is not a veteran. Rune has no signing bonus. Rune has a visa. Jasna has a visa. Lotte is not freelance. Lotte is not relocating. Ivo is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate has a background screening provided that it is not onboarded. Section 2: a candidate has a diploma provided that it is seasoned. Section 3: a candidate is not bonded provided that it has no diploma as well as is not relocating as well as is interviewed. Section 4: a candidate has no mentor provided that it is headhunted as well as is a veteran. Section 5: a candidate has a mentor provided that it is interviewed. Section 6: a candidate has no diploma provided that it is licensed. Section 7: a candidate is not licensed provided that it has a visa. Section 8: a candidate is bonded provided that it has no diploma as well as is relocating as well as is not certified. Section 9: a candidate is licensed provided that it has no signing bonus. Section 10: a candidate has no background screening provided that it is not freelance. Section 3 lapses for a candidate if it is relocating as well as has a signing bonus. Section 6 lapses for a candidate if it is seasoned as well as is not freelance. Section 1 lapses for a candidate if it has a visa. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Ivo is bonded. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012203", "pair_id": "u012203-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012203-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "86a207a9ec30df46", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 31}}
{"id": "syn-u012203-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is onboarded. Ivo is not interviewed. Jasna is relocating. Jasna has no signing bonus. Ivo is not freelance. Rune is certified. Lotte is not a veteran. Jasna is not headhunted. Ivo is not relocating. Ivo is not certified. Lotte is not seasoned. Jasna is freelance. Lotte has no signing bonus. Rune is not seasoned. Rune is relocating. Ivo has no signing bonus. Ivo is not a veteran. Rune has no signing bonus. Rune has a visa. Jasna has a visa. Lotte is not freelance. Lotte is not relocating. Ivo is not bilingual.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is not onboarded, it then has a background screening. #2 Each time a candidate is seasoned, it then has a diploma. #3 Each time a candidate has no diploma and additionally is not relocating and additionally is interviewed, it then is not bonded. #4 Each time a candidate is headhunted and additionally is a veteran, it then has no mentor. #5 Each time a candidate is interviewed, it then has a mentor. #6 Each time a candidate is licensed, it then has no diploma. #7 Each time a candidate has a visa, it then is not licensed. #8 Each time a candidate has no diploma and additionally is relocating and additionally is not certified, it then is bonded. #9 Each time a candidate has a signing bonus, it then is licensed. #10 Each time a candidate is not freelance, it then has no background screening. #3 is set aside if a candidate is relocating and additionally has a signing bonus. #6 is set aside if a candidate is seasoned and additionally is not freelance. #1 is set aside if a candidate has a visa. #10 yields to #1. #2 yields to #6. #9 yields to #7. #4 yields to #5. #3 yields to #8. Question: Do the terms above show that Ivo is bonded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012203", "pair_id": "u012203-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012203-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5bbe65ebafa2c3c4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 31}}
{"id": "syn-u012203-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is onboarded. Ivo is not interviewed. Jasna is relocating. Jasna has no signing bonus. Ivo is not freelance. Rune is certified. Lotte is not a veteran. Jasna is not headhunted. Ivo is not relocating. Ivo is not certified. Lotte is not seasoned. Jasna is freelance. Lotte has no signing bonus. Rune is not seasoned. Rune is relocating. Ivo has no signing bonus. Ivo is not a veteran. Rune has no signing bonus. Rune has a visa. Jasna has a visa. Lotte is not freelance. Lotte is not relocating. Ivo is not bilingual.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is not onboarded, it then has a background screening. #2 Each time a candidate is seasoned, it then has a diploma. #3 Each time a candidate has no diploma and additionally is not relocating and additionally is interviewed, it then is not bonded. #4 Each time a candidate is headhunted and additionally is a veteran, it then has no mentor. #5 Each time a candidate is interviewed, it then has a mentor. #6 Each time a candidate is licensed, it then has no diploma. #7 Each time a candidate has a visa, it then is not licensed. #8 Each time a candidate has no diploma and additionally is relocating and additionally is not certified, it then is bonded. #9 Each time a candidate has no signing bonus, it then is licensed. #10 Each time a candidate is not freelance, it then has no background screening. #3 is set aside if a candidate is relocating and additionally has a signing bonus. #6 is set aside if a candidate is seasoned and additionally is not freelance. #1 is set aside if a candidate has a visa. #10 yields to #1. #2 yields to #6. #9 yields to #7. #4 yields to #5. #3 yields to #8. Question: Do the terms above show that Ivo is bonded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012203", "pair_id": "u012203-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012203-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "86a207a9ec30df46", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 31}}
{"id": "syn-u012217-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is employed. Folke is not vetted. Dagny is employed. Folke is bankrupt. Ingrid is overdrawn. Wiebke is employed. Wiebke is bankrupt. Ingrid is not employed. Dagny is bankrupt. Wiebke is overdrawn. Wiebke is vetted. Folke is overdrawn.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no escrow account provided that it is bankrupt as well as is not indebted. Section 2: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it is bankrupt as well as is not vetted as well as is overdrawn. Section 3: a borrower is audited provided that it has no escrow account. Section 4: a borrower is not underwritten provided that it is not employed. Question: Wiebke has an escrow account. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012217", "pair_id": "u012217-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012217-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "6adc15553af43953", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012217-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is employed. Folke is not vetted. Dagny is employed. Folke is bankrupt. Ingrid is overdrawn. Wiebke is employed. Wiebke is bankrupt. Ingrid is not employed. Dagny is bankrupt. Wiebke is overdrawn. Wiebke is vetted. Folke is overdrawn.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no escrow account provided that it is bankrupt as well as is not indebted. Section 2: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it is bankrupt as well as is vetted as well as is overdrawn. Section 3: a borrower is audited provided that it has no escrow account. Section 4: a borrower is not underwritten provided that it is not employed. Question: Wiebke has an escrow account. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u012217", "pair_id": "u012217-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012217-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "032c9265b332a380", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012222-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss has a changelog. Gneiss is not merged. Gneiss is not tested. Gneiss is not linted. Gneiss has a feature toggle.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a changelog while is not tested, thus it has a security advisory. Provision 2: when the build here is linted, thus it is notarized. Provision 3: when the build here has a security advisory while is merged while has a changelog, thus it is not localized. Provision 4: when the build here has no feature toggle, thus it has no security advisory. Provision 5: when the build here is not tested while is not merged while has a feature toggle, thus it is tagged. Provision 6: when the build here has a security advisory while is not merged while is tagged, thus it is localized. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Gneiss is localized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u012222", "pair_id": "u012222-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012222-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "51a12d26855fd528", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 43}}
{"id": "syn-u012222-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss has a changelog. Gneiss is not merged. Gneiss is not tested. Gneiss is not linted. Gneiss has a feature toggle.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a changelog while is not tested, thus it has a security advisory. Provision 2: when the build here is linted, thus it is notarized. Provision 3: when the build here has a security advisory while is merged while has a changelog, thus it is not localized. Provision 4: when the build here has no feature toggle, thus it has no security advisory. Provision 5: when the build here is not tested while is not merged while has no feature toggle, thus it is tagged. Provision 6: when the build here has a security advisory while is not merged while is tagged, thus it is localized. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Gneiss is localized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012222", "pair_id": "u012222-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012222-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "41a947048e83f552", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 43}}
{"id": "syn-u012223-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda is not indemnified. Fabian is not indemnified. Fabian is lapsed. Wanda is a smoker. Fabian is subrogated. Fabian is not retired. Fabian is a smoker. Wanda has no beneficiary. Fabian is covered. Fabian has no beneficiary.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it is not grandfathered. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it has no adjuster. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is a claimant while is retired, thus it has flood coverage. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary, thus it is not uninsurable. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is lapsed, thus it is bundled. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is a claimant while is indemnified while is retired, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is a claimant while is uninsurable, thus it is appraised. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is a claimant while is a smoker, thus it has an adjuster. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is covered, thus it is a claimant. Provision 10: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is uninsurable. Provision 11: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it has no flood coverage. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 10. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 11. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Which one describes Fabian?", "options": ["is appraised", "has flood coverage", "has an adjuster", "is grandfathered"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has an adjuster", "unit_id": "u012223", "pair_id": "u012223-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012223-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7fa384dc4ae84337", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a10", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u012223-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda is not indemnified. Fabian is not indemnified. Fabian is lapsed. Wanda is a smoker. Fabian is subrogated. Fabian is not retired. Fabian is a smoker. Wanda has no beneficiary. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Fabian is covered. Fabian has no beneficiary.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it is not grandfathered. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it has no adjuster. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is a claimant while is retired, thus it has flood coverage. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary, thus it is not uninsurable. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is lapsed, thus it is bundled. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is a claimant while is indemnified while is retired, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is a claimant while is uninsurable, thus it is appraised. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is a claimant while is a smoker, thus it has an adjuster. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is covered, thus it is a claimant. Provision 10: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is uninsurable. Provision 11: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it has no flood coverage. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 10. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 11. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Which one describes Fabian?", "options": ["is appraised", "has flood coverage", "has an adjuster", "is grandfathered"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is appraised", "unit_id": "u012223", "pair_id": "u012223-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012223-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "db2a6b8b02919db2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a10", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u012240-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is a smoker. Viggo is not a smoker. Agata is indemnified. Agata is not a smoker. Xaver is not uninsurable. Yara is not indemnified. Viggo is not subrogated. Yara is not subrogated.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is indemnified, then it is appraised. (2) If a policyholder is lapsed, then it is not bundled. (3) If a policyholder is uninsurable, then it is not reimbursed. (4) If a policyholder is a smoker, then it is a claimant. (5) If a policyholder is not a smoker, then it is not appraised. (6) If a policyholder is disputed, then it is reimbursed. (7) If a policyholder is a smoker, then it is not a claimant. (8) If a policyholder is disputed, then it is lapsed. (9) If a policyholder is subrogated, then it is disputed. (10) If a policyholder is a claimant, then it has a premium discount. (11) If a policyholder has a premium discount, then it is bundled. (12) If a policyholder is subrogated, then it has a beneficiary. When (4) and (7) clash, (4) prevails. When (6) and (3) clash, (6) prevails. When (2) and (11) clash, (2) prevails. When (5) and (1) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Agata is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012240", "pair_id": "u012240-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012240-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3912b1c0cdce2539", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012240-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is a smoker. Viggo is not a smoker. Agata is indemnified. Agata is not a smoker. Xaver is not uninsurable. Yara is not indemnified. Viggo is not subrogated. Yara is not subrogated.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is indemnified, then it is appraised. (2) If a policyholder is lapsed, then it is not bundled. (3) If a policyholder is uninsurable, then it is not reimbursed. (4) If a policyholder is a smoker, then it is a claimant. (5) If a policyholder is a smoker, then it is not appraised. (6) If a policyholder is disputed, then it is reimbursed. (7) If a policyholder is a smoker, then it is not a claimant. (8) If a policyholder is disputed, then it is lapsed. (9) If a policyholder is subrogated, then it is disputed. (10) If a policyholder is a claimant, then it has a premium discount. (11) If a policyholder has a premium discount, then it is bundled. (12) If a policyholder is subrogated, then it has a beneficiary. When (4) and (7) clash, (4) prevails. When (6) and (3) clash, (6) prevails. When (2) and (11) clash, (2) prevails. When (5) and (1) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Agata is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012240", "pair_id": "u012240-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012240-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "27e4d6d051cfcab5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012240-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is a smoker. Viggo is not a smoker. Agata is indemnified. Agata is not a smoker. Xaver is not uninsurable. Yara is not indemnified. Viggo is not subrogated. Yara is not subrogated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is indemnified, it also is appraised. Clause 2: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is not bundled. Clause 3: once any policyholder is uninsurable, it also is not reimbursed. Clause 4: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is a claimant. Clause 5: once any policyholder is not a smoker, it also is not appraised. Clause 6: once any policyholder is disputed, it also is reimbursed. Clause 7: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is not a claimant. Clause 8: once any policyholder is disputed, it also is lapsed. Clause 9: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is disputed. Clause 10: once any policyholder is a claimant, it also has a premium discount. Clause 11: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also is bundled. Clause 12: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 4 overrides Clause 7. Clause 6 overrides Clause 3. Clause 2 overrides Clause 11. Clause 5 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Agata is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012240", "pair_id": "u012240-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012240-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3912b1c0cdce2539", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012240-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is a smoker. Viggo is not a smoker. Agata is indemnified. Agata is not a smoker. Xaver is not uninsurable. Yara is not indemnified. Viggo is not subrogated. Yara is not subrogated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is indemnified, it also is appraised. Clause 2: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is not bundled. Clause 3: once any policyholder is uninsurable, it also is not reimbursed. Clause 4: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is a claimant. Clause 5: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is not appraised. Clause 6: once any policyholder is disputed, it also is reimbursed. Clause 7: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is not a claimant. Clause 8: once any policyholder is disputed, it also is lapsed. Clause 9: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is disputed. Clause 10: once any policyholder is a claimant, it also has a premium discount. Clause 11: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also is bundled. Clause 12: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 4 overrides Clause 7. Clause 6 overrides Clause 3. Clause 2 overrides Clause 11. Clause 5 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Agata is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012240", "pair_id": "u012240-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012240-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "27e4d6d051cfcab5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012250-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Corin has no collateral. Corin has a cosigner. Corin is solvent. Bastien is not a depositor. Corin is not a depositor. Hamid has no cosigner. Corin is pensioned. Corin is bankrupt. Corin is underwritten. Bastien has collateral. Hamid is not pensioned. Corin is employed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy plus is bankrupt: then it is garnished. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is garnished plus is employed: then it is refinanced. Policy III. Suppose that borrower has a cosigner: then it is not refinanced. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it is not overdrawn. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is garnished plus is pensioned plus is a depositor: then it is delinquent. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is garnished plus has a cosigner: then it is indebted. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is garnished plus has collateral: then it is vetted. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower is solvent: then it is prequalified. Policy IX. Suppose that borrower is garnished plus is a depositor plus is underwritten: then it is a homeowner. Policy X. Suppose that borrower is garnished plus has a lien plus is a depositor: then it is overdrawn. Policy XI. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt: then it is creditworthy. Policy XII. Suppose that borrower is pensioned: then it is not a homeowner. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy X. In a clash, Policy XII beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy II. Question: Which choice is right for Corin?", "options": ["is vetted", "is overdrawn", "is indebted", "is refinanced", "is delinquent", "is a homeowner"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is indebted", "unit_id": "u012250", "pair_id": "u012250-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012250-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6d589291fd872c4f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a10", "a11", "a16", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u012250-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Corin has no collateral. Corin has no cosigner. Corin is solvent. Bastien is not a depositor. Corin is not a depositor. Hamid has no cosigner. Corin is pensioned. Corin is bankrupt. Corin is underwritten. Bastien has collateral. Hamid is not pensioned. Corin is employed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy plus is bankrupt: then it is garnished. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is garnished plus is employed: then it is refinanced. Policy III. Suppose that borrower has a cosigner: then it is not refinanced. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it is not overdrawn. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is garnished plus is pensioned plus is a depositor: then it is delinquent. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is garnished plus has a cosigner: then it is indebted. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is garnished plus has collateral: then it is vetted. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower is solvent: then it is prequalified. Policy IX. Suppose that borrower is garnished plus is a depositor plus is underwritten: then it is a homeowner. Policy X. Suppose that borrower is garnished plus has a lien plus is a depositor: then it is overdrawn. Policy XI. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt: then it is creditworthy. Policy XII. Suppose that borrower is pensioned: then it is not a homeowner. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy X. In a clash, Policy XII beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy II. Question: Which choice is right for Corin?", "options": ["is vetted", "is overdrawn", "is indebted", "is refinanced", "is delinquent", "is a homeowner"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is refinanced", "unit_id": "u012250", "pair_id": "u012250-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012250-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "71ee205c9b1e148f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a10", "a11", "a16", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u012250-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Corin has no collateral. Corin has a cosigner. Corin is solvent. Bastien is not a depositor. Corin is not a depositor. Hamid has no cosigner. Corin is pensioned. Corin is bankrupt. Corin is underwritten. Bastien has collateral. Hamid is not pensioned. Corin is employed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is creditworthy and additionally is bankrupt, it then is garnished. #2 Each time a borrower is garnished and additionally is employed, it then is refinanced. #3 Each time a borrower has a cosigner, it then is not refinanced. #4 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then is not overdrawn. #5 Each time a borrower is garnished and additionally is pensioned and additionally is a depositor, it then is delinquent. #6 Each time a borrower is garnished and additionally has a cosigner, it then is indebted. #7 Each time a borrower is garnished and additionally has collateral, it then is vetted. #8 Each time a borrower is solvent, it then is prequalified. #9 Each time a borrower is garnished and additionally is a depositor and additionally is underwritten, it then is a homeowner. #10 Each time a borrower is garnished and additionally has a lien and additionally is a depositor, it then is overdrawn. #11 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then is creditworthy. #12 Each time a borrower is pensioned, it then is not a homeowner. #10 yields to #4. #9 yields to #12. #2 yields to #3. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Corin?", "options": ["is vetted", "is overdrawn", "is indebted", "is refinanced", "is delinquent", "is a homeowner"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is indebted", "unit_id": "u012250", "pair_id": "u012250-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012250-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6d589291fd872c4f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a10", "a11", "a16", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u012250-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Corin has no collateral. Corin has no cosigner. Corin is solvent. Bastien is not a depositor. Corin is not a depositor. Hamid has no cosigner. Corin is pensioned. Corin is bankrupt. Corin is underwritten. Bastien has collateral. Hamid is not pensioned. Corin is employed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is creditworthy and additionally is bankrupt, it then is garnished. #2 Each time a borrower is garnished and additionally is employed, it then is refinanced. #3 Each time a borrower has a cosigner, it then is not refinanced. #4 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then is not overdrawn. #5 Each time a borrower is garnished and additionally is pensioned and additionally is a depositor, it then is delinquent. #6 Each time a borrower is garnished and additionally has a cosigner, it then is indebted. #7 Each time a borrower is garnished and additionally has collateral, it then is vetted. #8 Each time a borrower is solvent, it then is prequalified. #9 Each time a borrower is garnished and additionally is a depositor and additionally is underwritten, it then is a homeowner. #10 Each time a borrower is garnished and additionally has a lien and additionally is a depositor, it then is overdrawn. #11 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then is creditworthy. #12 Each time a borrower is pensioned, it then is not a homeowner. #10 yields to #4. #9 yields to #12. #2 yields to #3. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Corin?", "options": ["is vetted", "is overdrawn", "is indebted", "is refinanced", "is delinquent", "is a homeowner"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is refinanced", "unit_id": "u012250", "pair_id": "u012250-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012250-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "71ee205c9b1e148f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a10", "a11", "a16", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u012274-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice has a security advisory. Pumice is not reproducible. Pumice has a patch cycle of 96.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has no security advisory, thus it is experimental. Provision 2: when the build here has a security advisory, thus it is not backported. Provision 3: when the build here has a patch cycle at or above 78, thus it is flaky. Question: Would it be right to say that Pumice is reproducible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012274", "pair_id": "u012274-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012274-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "4373cf03fc34f925", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u012274-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice has a security advisory. Pumice is reproducible. Pumice has a patch cycle of 96.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has no security advisory, thus it is experimental. Provision 2: when the build here has a security advisory, thus it is not backported. Provision 3: when the build here has a patch cycle at or above 78, thus it is flaky. Question: Would it be right to say that Pumice is reproducible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u012274", "pair_id": "u012274-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012274-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a652ad8197be7933", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u012300-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Florin has a pulse rate of 74. Zora is rescheduled. Florin is not waitlisted. Gunnar has a pain level of 18. Zora has a pulse rate of 69. Florin is rescheduled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is asthmatic, it also is referred. Clause 2: once any patient has a pulse rate over 44, it also is asthmatic. Clause 3: once any patient is rescheduled, it also is fasting. Clause 4: once any patient is not waitlisted, it also is contagious. Clause 5: once any patient is pregnant, it also has a chaperone. Clause 6: once any patient is discharged, it also has an interpreter. Clause 7: once any patient has a pulse rate of 44 or less, it also is pregnant. Clause 8: once any patient has a pulse rate under 69, it also is not postoperative. Clause 9: once any patient is symptomatic, it also is anemic. Clause 10: once any patient has a pulse rate over 36, it also is bedridden. Clause 11: once any patient has a pain level under 73, it also is discharged. Clause 12: once any patient is contagious, it also has a caregiver. Clause 13: once any patient has a pain level of 73 or more, it also is symptomatic. Question: Which of these is true of Zora?", "options": ["is referred", "has an interpreter", "has a caregiver", "is anemic", "has a chaperone"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is referred", "unit_id": "u012300", "pair_id": "u012300-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012300-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "3a2ece5b0c9ca6b3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a3", "a13", "a15", "a14"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u012300-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Florin has a pulse rate of 74. Zora is rescheduled. Florin is not waitlisted. Gunnar has a pain level of 18. Zora has a pulse rate of 67. Florin is rescheduled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is asthmatic, it also is referred. Clause 2: once any patient has a pulse rate over 44, it also is asthmatic. Clause 3: once any patient is rescheduled, it also is fasting. Clause 4: once any patient is not waitlisted, it also is contagious. Clause 5: once any patient is pregnant, it also has a chaperone. Clause 6: once any patient is discharged, it also has an interpreter. Clause 7: once any patient has a pulse rate of 44 or less, it also is pregnant. Clause 8: once any patient has a pulse rate under 69, it also is not postoperative. Clause 9: once any patient is symptomatic, it also is anemic. Clause 10: once any patient has a pulse rate over 36, it also is bedridden. Clause 11: once any patient has a pain level under 73, it also is discharged. Clause 12: once any patient is contagious, it also has a caregiver. Clause 13: once any patient has a pain level of 73 or more, it also is symptomatic. Question: Which of these is true of Zora?", "options": ["is referred", "has an interpreter", "has a caregiver", "is anemic", "has a chaperone"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is referred", "unit_id": "u012300", "pair_id": "u012300-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012300-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "641720becf1349c4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a3", "a13", "a15", "a14"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u012323-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is stamped. Kaveh has a weight class of 39. Odile is not stamped. Odile is consolidated. Kaveh is consolidated. Jory is not weighed. Jory is not consolidated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has a weight class less than 38, it then is delayed. #2 Each time a parcel is consolidated, it then is not tracked. #3 Each time a parcel has a weight class less than 50, it then is labeled. #4 Each time a parcel is stamped, it then is hazardous. #5 Each time a parcel has a weight class of 50 or above, it then is refrigerated. #6 Each time a parcel is sealed, it then is rerouted. #7 Each time a parcel has a delivery window less than 25, it then is registered. #8 Each time a parcel is weighed, it then has a courier. #9 Each time a parcel has a delivery window of 25 or above, it then is sealed. #10 Each time a parcel is oversized, it then is fragile. #2 is set aside if a parcel is oversized. #4 is set aside if a parcel is weighed. #5 is set aside if a parcel has a weight class less than 74. #8 is set aside if a parcel has a delivery window greater than 55. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Jory?", "options": ["has a courier", "is registered", "is fragile", "is hazardous", "is labeled", "is refrigerated", "is sealed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is hazardous", "unit_id": "u012323", "pair_id": "u012323-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012323-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c27ca9bb6cba3c8d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a2", "a0", "a15", "a1", "a5", "a10"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u012323-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is stamped. Kaveh has a weight class of 39. Odile is not stamped. Odile is consolidated. Kaveh is consolidated. Jory is not weighed. Jory is consolidated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has a weight class less than 38, it then is delayed. #2 Each time a parcel is consolidated, it then is not tracked. #3 Each time a parcel has a weight class less than 50, it then is labeled. #4 Each time a parcel is stamped, it then is hazardous. #5 Each time a parcel has a weight class of 50 or above, it then is refrigerated. #6 Each time a parcel is sealed, it then is rerouted. #7 Each time a parcel has a delivery window less than 25, it then is registered. #8 Each time a parcel is weighed, it then has a courier. #9 Each time a parcel has a delivery window of 25 or above, it then is sealed. #10 Each time a parcel is oversized, it then is fragile. #2 is set aside if a parcel is oversized. #4 is set aside if a parcel is weighed. #5 is set aside if a parcel has a weight class less than 74. #8 is set aside if a parcel has a delivery window greater than 55. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Jory?", "options": ["has a courier", "is registered", "is fragile", "is hazardous", "is labeled", "is refrigerated", "is sealed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is hazardous", "unit_id": "u012323", "pair_id": "u012323-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012323-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2c8f69f5c0ed0a90", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a2", "a0", "a15", "a1", "a5", "a10"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u012327-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo has no rider. Viggo has no deductible waiver. Yara has a deductible waiver. Yara has no rider. Edda has a rider. Yara is covered. Edda is indemnified. Edda is not covered. Yara is indemnified. Viggo is not indemnified. Yara is not litigated. Edda is not litigated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is inspected and also has a deductible waiver and also is litigated, it also is reinstated. Clause 2: once any policyholder is a smoker and also has a deductible waiver, it also is inspected. Clause 3: once any policyholder has no deductible waiver, it also is a smoker. Clause 4: once any policyholder is inspected and also is indemnified and also has a rider, it also is not reinstated. Clause 5: once any policyholder is covered and also is indemnified and also is litigated, it also is lapsed. Question: Does it follow that Yara is reinstated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012327", "pair_id": "u012327-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012327-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "64f2aaf7896b8fe7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u012327-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo has no rider. Viggo has no deductible waiver. Yara has a deductible waiver. Yara has no rider. Edda has a rider. Yara is covered. Edda is indemnified. Edda is not covered. Yara is indemnified. Viggo is not indemnified. Yara is not litigated. Edda is not litigated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is inspected and also has a deductible waiver and also is litigated, it also is reinstated. Clause 2: once any policyholder is a smoker and also has a deductible waiver, it also is inspected. Clause 3: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also is a smoker. Clause 4: once any policyholder is inspected and also is indemnified and also has a rider, it also is not reinstated. Clause 5: once any policyholder is covered and also is indemnified and also is litigated, it also is lapsed. Question: Does it follow that Yara is reinstated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012327", "pair_id": "u012327-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012327-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "f32d4cb7cac75ce2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u012338-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra has a dedicated host. Sierra is not isolated. Sierra is not encrypted. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra has a snapshot.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is encrypted, it then is monitored. #2 Each time a workload is encrypted and additionally has a failover node and additionally has a dedicated host, it then has a firewall. #3 Each time a workload is encrypted and additionally has a dedicated host, it then has no firewall. #4 Each time a workload has a snapshot and additionally is isolated, it then is not monitored. #1 yields to #4. #3 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Sierra has a firewall?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012338", "pair_id": "u012338-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012338-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7f16dbb0922e5ff6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012338-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra has a dedicated host. Sierra is not isolated. Sierra is encrypted. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra has a snapshot.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is encrypted, it then is monitored. #2 Each time a workload is encrypted and additionally has a failover node and additionally has a dedicated host, it then has a firewall. #3 Each time a workload is encrypted and additionally has a dedicated host, it then has no firewall. #4 Each time a workload has a snapshot and additionally is isolated, it then is not monitored. #1 yields to #4. #3 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Sierra has a firewall?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u012338", "pair_id": "u012338-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012338-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "28ca22a01c5a3a7d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012382-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is theoretical. Deneb has a milestone total of 41. Deneb has no field site. Deneb has industry backing. Deneb is not renewed. Deneb is not exploratory. Deneb has seed funding. Deneb is shortlisted.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has seed funding and is not theoretical and has no industry backing, then it is not preregistered. (2) If a proposal is not exploratory and is renewed, then it is interdisciplinary. (3) If a proposal has a milestone total below 79 and is shortlisted, then it is not multicenter. (4) If a proposal has seed funding and is theoretical and has no field site, then it is preregistered. (5) If a proposal has no seed funding, then it is cofunded. Question: Is it true that Deneb is not preregistered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012382", "pair_id": "u012382-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012382-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "88f6c80b89049e0a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012382-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is theoretical. Deneb has a milestone total of 41. Deneb has no field site. Deneb has industry backing. Deneb is not renewed. Deneb is not exploratory. Deneb has seed funding. Deneb is shortlisted.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has seed funding and is not theoretical and has no industry backing, then it is not preregistered. (2) If a proposal is not exploratory and is renewed, then it is interdisciplinary. (3) If a proposal has a milestone total of at least 79 and is shortlisted, then it is not multicenter. (4) If a proposal has seed funding and is theoretical and has no field site, then it is preregistered. (5) If a proposal has no seed funding, then it is cofunded. Question: Is it true that Deneb is not preregistered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012382", "pair_id": "u012382-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012382-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "f2f302418ef254e4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012382-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is theoretical. Deneb has a milestone total of 41. Deneb has no field site. Deneb has industry backing. Deneb is not renewed. Deneb is not exploratory. Deneb has seed funding. Deneb is shortlisted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has seed funding, and is not theoretical, and has no industry backing, that proposal is not preregistered. Item B. When the proposal is not exploratory, and is renewed, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item C. When the proposal has a milestone total of less than 79, and is shortlisted, that proposal is not multicenter. Item D. When the proposal has seed funding, and is theoretical, and has no field site, that proposal is preregistered. Item E. When the proposal has no seed funding, that proposal is cofunded. Question: Can one infer that Deneb is not preregistered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012382", "pair_id": "u012382-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012382-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "88f6c80b89049e0a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012382-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is theoretical. Deneb has a milestone total of 41. Deneb has no field site. Deneb has industry backing. Deneb is not renewed. Deneb is not exploratory. Deneb has seed funding. Deneb is shortlisted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has seed funding, and is not theoretical, and has no industry backing, that proposal is not preregistered. Item B. When the proposal is not exploratory, and is renewed, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item C. When the proposal has a milestone total of no less than 79, and is shortlisted, that proposal is not multicenter. Item D. When the proposal has seed funding, and is theoretical, and has no field site, that proposal is preregistered. Item E. When the proposal has no seed funding, that proposal is cofunded. Question: Can one infer that Deneb is not preregistered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012382", "pair_id": "u012382-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012382-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "f2f302418ef254e4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012425-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is cofunded. Nashira is not shortlisted. Nashira has no patent filing. Nashira is not theoretical. Nashira is renewed. Nashira has a review mark of 13. Nashira is longitudinal. Nashira is not multicenter.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is theoretical, then it is not preregistered. (2) If a proposal is multicenter and has a review mark below 67 and is not shortlisted, then it has seed funding. (3) If a proposal has seed funding and is not renewed and is exploratory, then it is embargoed. (4) If a proposal has seed funding and is renewed and has a review mark of at most 53, then it is not embargoed. (5) If a proposal has a review mark of at least 35 and is not cofunded, then it has ethics clearance. (1) is void if the proposal is not renewed. (4) is void if the proposal has a patent filing and is not longitudinal. (5) is void if the proposal is not renewed. Question: Is it true that Nashira is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012425", "pair_id": "u012425-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012425-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e0ad18422ee68d65", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u012425-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is cofunded. Nashira is not shortlisted. Nashira has no patent filing. Nashira is not theoretical. Nashira is renewed. Nashira has a review mark of 13. Nashira is longitudinal. Nashira is not multicenter.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is not theoretical, then it is not preregistered. (2) If a proposal is multicenter and has a review mark below 67 and is not shortlisted, then it has seed funding. (3) If a proposal has seed funding and is not renewed and is exploratory, then it is embargoed. (4) If a proposal has seed funding and is renewed and has a review mark of at most 53, then it is not embargoed. (5) If a proposal has a review mark of at least 35 and is not cofunded, then it has ethics clearance. (1) is void if the proposal is not renewed. (4) is void if the proposal has a patent filing and is not longitudinal. (5) is void if the proposal is not renewed. Question: Is it true that Nashira is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012425", "pair_id": "u012425-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012425-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "39a9a34eb0d11b86", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u012425-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is cofunded. Nashira is not shortlisted. Nashira has no patent filing. Nashira is not theoretical. Nashira is renewed. Nashira has a review mark of 13. Nashira is longitudinal. Nashira is not multicenter.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is theoretical, that proposal is not preregistered. Item B. When the proposal is multicenter, and has a review mark of less than 67, and is not shortlisted, that proposal has seed funding. Item C. When the proposal has seed funding, and is not renewed, and is exploratory, that proposal is embargoed. Item D. When the proposal has seed funding, and is renewed, and has a review mark of no more than 53, that proposal is not embargoed. Item E. When the proposal has a review mark of no less than 35, and is not cofunded, that proposal has ethics clearance. Item A is suspended when the proposal is not renewed. Item D is suspended when the proposal has a patent filing, and is not longitudinal. Item E is suspended when the proposal is not renewed. Question: Can one infer that Nashira is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012425", "pair_id": "u012425-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012425-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e0ad18422ee68d65", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u012425-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is cofunded. Nashira is not shortlisted. Nashira has no patent filing. Nashira is not theoretical. Nashira is renewed. Nashira has a review mark of 13. Nashira is longitudinal. Nashira is not multicenter.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is not theoretical, that proposal is not preregistered. Item B. When the proposal is multicenter, and has a review mark of less than 67, and is not shortlisted, that proposal has seed funding. Item C. When the proposal has seed funding, and is not renewed, and is exploratory, that proposal is embargoed. Item D. When the proposal has seed funding, and is renewed, and has a review mark of no more than 53, that proposal is not embargoed. Item E. When the proposal has a review mark of no less than 35, and is not cofunded, that proposal has ethics clearance. Item A is suspended when the proposal is not renewed. Item D is suspended when the proposal has a patent filing, and is not longitudinal. Item E is suspended when the proposal is not renewed. Question: Can one infer that Nashira is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012425", "pair_id": "u012425-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012425-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "39a9a34eb0d11b86", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u012491-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not labeled. Kaveh has a locker slot. Kaveh is sealed. Kaveh has no courier. Kaveh has a delivery window of 34. Kaveh is scanned. Kaveh is rerouted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here has a delivery window beneath 62 while is not labeled while is perishable, thus it is not consolidated. Provision 2: when the parcel here is sealed while is scanned, thus it is hazardous. Provision 3: when the parcel here has no courier, thus it is registered. Provision 4: when the parcel here is sealed while is not labeled, thus it is consolidated. Provision 5: when the parcel here is not rerouted while has no courier while has no locker slot, thus it is not fragile. Question: Would it be right to say that Kaveh is consolidated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u012491", "pair_id": "u012491-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012491-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "3e9642dfdae2e635", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012491-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not labeled. Kaveh has a locker slot. Kaveh is sealed. Kaveh has no courier. Kaveh has a delivery window of 34. Kaveh is scanned. Kaveh is rerouted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here has a delivery window beneath 62 while is not labeled while is perishable, thus it is not consolidated. Provision 2: when the parcel here is sealed while is scanned, thus it is hazardous. Provision 3: when the parcel here has no courier, thus it is registered. Provision 4: when the parcel here is sealed while is labeled, thus it is consolidated. Provision 5: when the parcel here is not rerouted while has no courier while has no locker slot, thus it is not fragile. Question: Would it be right to say that Kaveh is consolidated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012491", "pair_id": "u012491-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012491-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "23de2f8b1370351c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012513-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not versioned. Pumice is documented. Pumice is reverted. Quartz has a migration script. Quartz is not experimental. Pumice is merged. Quartz is documented. Quartz is signed. Quartz is not merged. Pumice is not localized. Pumice is backported. Quartz is not localized. Pumice is benchmarked. Feldspar is not localized. Pumice is experimental. Pumice is notarized. Pumice is not signed. Feldspar is not documented. Feldspar is not notarized. Feldspar is not signed. Feldspar is not backported. Quartz is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is benchmarked, and is reverted, and is signed, that build is compiled. Item B. When the build is not merged, that build is not compiled. Item C. When the build is tagged, and is versioned, that build is not reproducible. Item D. When the build is notarized, and is documented, and is localized, that build is not flaky. Item E. When the build is tagged, and is merged, and is experimental, that build is reproducible. Item F. When the build is merged, that build is tagged. Item G. When the build is merged, that build is not tagged. Item D is suspended when the build is experimental. Item E is suspended when the build is backported, and has a migration script. Item F outranks Item G. Item C outranks Item E. Item A outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Pumice is reproducible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u012513", "pair_id": "u012513-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012513-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e7ad3b185e370a77", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u012513-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not versioned. Pumice is documented. Pumice is reverted. Quartz has a migration script. Quartz is not experimental. Pumice is merged. Quartz is documented. Quartz is signed. Quartz is not merged. Pumice is not localized. Pumice is backported. Quartz is not localized. Pumice is benchmarked. Feldspar is not localized. Pumice is experimental. Pumice is notarized. Pumice is not signed. Feldspar is not documented. Feldspar is not notarized. Feldspar is not signed. Feldspar is not backported. Quartz is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is benchmarked, and is reverted, and is signed, that build is compiled. Item B. When the build is merged, that build is not compiled. Item C. When the build is tagged, and is versioned, that build is not reproducible. Item D. When the build is notarized, and is documented, and is localized, that build is not flaky. Item E. When the build is tagged, and is merged, and is experimental, that build is reproducible. Item F. When the build is merged, that build is tagged. Item G. When the build is merged, that build is not tagged. Item D is suspended when the build is experimental. Item E is suspended when the build is backported, and has a migration script. Item F outranks Item G. Item C outranks Item E. Item A outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Pumice is reproducible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u012513", "pair_id": "u012513-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012513-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "812a208f4572878c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u012514-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid is overdrawn. Ingrid has a lien. Ingrid is not indebted. Ingrid is a depositor. Ingrid is employed. Ingrid has a repayment grade of 68. Ingrid has a risk tier of 62. Ingrid is refinanced. Ingrid is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no collateral provided that it has an escrow account. Section 2: a borrower is foreclosed provided that it is solvent as well as has a guarantor. Section 3: a borrower is solvent provided that it is a depositor as well as has a lien. Section 4: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it is solvent as well as has an escrow account as well as is indebted. Section 5: a borrower has no cosigner provided that it is employed. Section 6: a borrower is delinquent provided that it is solvent as well as is employed as well as is overdrawn. Section 7: a borrower is not garnished provided that it has a guarantor. Section 8: a borrower is garnished provided that it is solvent as well as has a risk tier of 67 or higher. Section 9: a borrower is not vetted provided that it is bankrupt. Section 10: a borrower has collateral provided that it is solvent as well as has a debt ratio exceeding 15. Section 11: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it is solvent as well as has a repayment grade exceeding 11 as well as is refinanced. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 11. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 8. Question: Which statement fits Ingrid?", "options": ["has collateral", "has a cosigner", "is foreclosed", "is garnished", "is a homeowner", "is delinquent"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is delinquent", "unit_id": "u012514", "pair_id": "u012514-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012514-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c43168a33d869a89", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a5", "a0", "a6", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012514-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid is overdrawn. Ingrid has a lien. Ingrid is not indebted. Ingrid is a depositor. Ingrid is not employed. Ingrid has a repayment grade of 68. Ingrid has a risk tier of 62. Ingrid is refinanced. Ingrid is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no collateral provided that it has an escrow account. Section 2: a borrower is foreclosed provided that it is solvent as well as has a guarantor. Section 3: a borrower is solvent provided that it is a depositor as well as has a lien. Section 4: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it is solvent as well as has an escrow account as well as is indebted. Section 5: a borrower has no cosigner provided that it is employed. Section 6: a borrower is delinquent provided that it is solvent as well as is employed as well as is overdrawn. Section 7: a borrower is not garnished provided that it has a guarantor. Section 8: a borrower is garnished provided that it is solvent as well as has a risk tier of 67 or higher. Section 9: a borrower is not vetted provided that it is bankrupt. Section 10: a borrower has collateral provided that it is solvent as well as has a debt ratio exceeding 15. Section 11: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it is solvent as well as has a repayment grade exceeding 11 as well as is refinanced. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 11. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 8. Question: Which statement fits Ingrid?", "options": ["has collateral", "has a cosigner", "is foreclosed", "is garnished", "is a homeowner", "is delinquent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a cosigner", "unit_id": "u012514", "pair_id": "u012514-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012514-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "45011969e6aa6f59", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a5", "a0", "a6", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012514-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid is overdrawn. Ingrid has a lien. Ingrid is not indebted. Ingrid is a depositor. Ingrid is employed. Ingrid has a repayment grade of 68. Ingrid has a risk tier of 62. Ingrid is refinanced. Ingrid is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it has no collateral. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is solvent plus has a guarantor: then it is foreclosed. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is a depositor plus has a lien: then it is solvent. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is solvent plus has an escrow account plus is indebted: then it is a homeowner. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is employed: then it has no cosigner. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is solvent plus is employed plus is overdrawn: then it is delinquent. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has a guarantor: then it is not garnished. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower is solvent plus has a risk tier no lower than 67: then it is garnished. Policy IX. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt: then it is not vetted. Policy X. Suppose that borrower is solvent plus has a debt ratio higher than 15: then it has collateral. Policy XI. Suppose that borrower is solvent plus has a repayment grade higher than 11 plus is refinanced: then it has a cosigner. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy XI. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy X. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VIII. Question: Which choice is right for Ingrid?", "options": ["has collateral", "has a cosigner", "is foreclosed", "is garnished", "is a homeowner", "is delinquent"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is delinquent", "unit_id": "u012514", "pair_id": "u012514-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012514-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c43168a33d869a89", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a5", "a0", "a6", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012514-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid is overdrawn. Ingrid has a lien. Ingrid is not indebted. Ingrid is a depositor. Ingrid is not employed. Ingrid has a repayment grade of 68. Ingrid has a risk tier of 62. Ingrid is refinanced. Ingrid is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it has no collateral. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is solvent plus has a guarantor: then it is foreclosed. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is a depositor plus has a lien: then it is solvent. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is solvent plus has an escrow account plus is indebted: then it is a homeowner. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is employed: then it has no cosigner. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is solvent plus is employed plus is overdrawn: then it is delinquent. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has a guarantor: then it is not garnished. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower is solvent plus has a risk tier no lower than 67: then it is garnished. Policy IX. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt: then it is not vetted. Policy X. Suppose that borrower is solvent plus has a debt ratio higher than 15: then it has collateral. Policy XI. Suppose that borrower is solvent plus has a repayment grade higher than 11 plus is refinanced: then it has a cosigner. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy XI. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy X. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VIII. Question: Which choice is right for Ingrid?", "options": ["has collateral", "has a cosigner", "is foreclosed", "is garnished", "is a homeowner", "is delinquent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a cosigner", "unit_id": "u012514", "pair_id": "u012514-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012514-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "45011969e6aa6f59", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a5", "a0", "a6", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012514-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid is overdrawn. Ingrid has a lien. Ingrid is not indebted. Ingrid is a depositor. Ingrid is employed. Ingrid has a repayment grade of 68. Ingrid has a risk tier of 62. Ingrid is refinanced. Ingrid is bankrupt.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then has no collateral. #2 Each time a borrower is solvent and additionally has a guarantor, it then is foreclosed. #3 Each time a borrower is a depositor and additionally has a lien, it then is solvent. #4 Each time a borrower is solvent and additionally has an escrow account and additionally is indebted, it then is a homeowner. #5 Each time a borrower is employed, it then has no cosigner. #6 Each time a borrower is solvent and additionally is employed and additionally is overdrawn, it then is delinquent. #7 Each time a borrower has a guarantor, it then is not garnished. #8 Each time a borrower is solvent and additionally has a risk tier of 67 or above, it then is garnished. #9 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then is not vetted. #10 Each time a borrower is solvent and additionally has a debt ratio greater than 15, it then has collateral. #11 Each time a borrower is solvent and additionally has a repayment grade greater than 11 and additionally is refinanced, it then has a cosigner. #11 yields to #5. #10 yields to #1. #8 yields to #7. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Ingrid?", "options": ["has collateral", "has a cosigner", "is foreclosed", "is garnished", "is a homeowner", "is delinquent"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is delinquent", "unit_id": "u012514", "pair_id": "u012514-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012514-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c43168a33d869a89", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a5", "a0", "a6", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012514-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid is overdrawn. Ingrid has a lien. Ingrid is not indebted. Ingrid is a depositor. Ingrid is not employed. Ingrid has a repayment grade of 68. Ingrid has a risk tier of 62. Ingrid is refinanced. Ingrid is bankrupt.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then has no collateral. #2 Each time a borrower is solvent and additionally has a guarantor, it then is foreclosed. #3 Each time a borrower is a depositor and additionally has a lien, it then is solvent. #4 Each time a borrower is solvent and additionally has an escrow account and additionally is indebted, it then is a homeowner. #5 Each time a borrower is employed, it then has no cosigner. #6 Each time a borrower is solvent and additionally is employed and additionally is overdrawn, it then is delinquent. #7 Each time a borrower has a guarantor, it then is not garnished. #8 Each time a borrower is solvent and additionally has a risk tier of 67 or above, it then is garnished. #9 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then is not vetted. #10 Each time a borrower is solvent and additionally has a debt ratio greater than 15, it then has collateral. #11 Each time a borrower is solvent and additionally has a repayment grade greater than 11 and additionally is refinanced, it then has a cosigner. #11 yields to #5. #10 yields to #1. #8 yields to #7. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Ingrid?", "options": ["has collateral", "has a cosigner", "is foreclosed", "is garnished", "is a homeowner", "is delinquent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a cosigner", "unit_id": "u012514", "pair_id": "u012514-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012514-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "45011969e6aa6f59", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a5", "a0", "a6", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012562-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is subrogated. Xaver has a beneficiary.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has an adjuster provided that it is subrogated. Section 2: a policyholder is not uninsurable provided that it is retired. Question: Xaver is uninsurable. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012562", "pair_id": "u012562-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012562-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "607661f488625ac6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u012562-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is subrogated. Xaver has a beneficiary.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has an adjuster provided that it is subrogated. Section 2: a policyholder is not uninsurable provided that it is retired. Section 3: a policyholder is uninsurable provided that it has a beneficiary. Question: Xaver is uninsurable. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u012562", "pair_id": "u012562-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012562-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "e38ea1fb90601914", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u012562-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is subrogated. Xaver has a beneficiary.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is subrogated, it then has an adjuster. #2 Each time a policyholder is retired, it then is not uninsurable. Question: Do the terms above show that Xaver is uninsurable?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012562", "pair_id": "u012562-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012562-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "607661f488625ac6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u012562-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is subrogated. Xaver has a beneficiary.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is subrogated, it then has an adjuster. #2 Each time a policyholder is retired, it then is not uninsurable. #3 Each time a policyholder has a beneficiary, it then is uninsurable. Question: Do the terms above show that Xaver is uninsurable?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u012562", "pair_id": "u012562-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012562-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "e38ea1fb90601914", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u012589-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice is not localized. Basalt is fuzzed. Basalt is localized. Basalt is not tested. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 30. Pumice has a lint backlog of 29. Pumice is backported. Gneiss has a defect tally of 41. Zircon is not backported. Basalt is backported.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is signed: then it is minified. Policy II. Suppose that build is localized: then it is flaky. Policy III. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it is merged. Policy IV. Suppose that build is profiled: then it has no security advisory. Policy V. Suppose that build is flaky: then it has a security advisory. Policy VI. Suppose that build has a lint backlog no lower than 15: then it is tagged. Policy VII. Suppose that build is profiled: then it is documented. Policy VIII. Suppose that build has a lint backlog smaller than 76: then it is reproducible. Policy IX. Suppose that build is backported: then it is not flaky. Policy X. Suppose that build is benchmarked: then it is reverted. Policy XI. Suppose that build has a defect tally no higher than 55: then it is benchmarked. Policy XII. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is not tagged. Policy XIII. Suppose that build is tested: then it is not signed. Policy XIV. Suppose that build has a lint backlog no lower than 76: then it is signed. Policy XV. Suppose that build is not tested: then it is profiled. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy XIII beats Policy XIV. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy XII. Question: Which choice is right for Basalt?", "options": ["is minified", "is merged", "is reverted", "is documented", "has a security advisory"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is documented", "unit_id": "u012589", "pair_id": "u012589-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/14/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012589-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c0427890daf4389f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a7", "a8", "a15", "a4"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u012589-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice is not localized. Basalt is fuzzed. Basalt is localized. Basalt is not tested. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 30. Pumice has a lint backlog of 29. Pumice is backported. Gneiss has a defect tally of 41. Zircon is not backported. Basalt is backported.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is signed: then it is minified. Policy II. Suppose that build is localized: then it is flaky. Policy III. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it is merged. Policy IV. Suppose that build is profiled: then it has no security advisory. Policy V. Suppose that build is flaky: then it has a security advisory. Policy VI. Suppose that build has a lint backlog no lower than 15: then it is tagged. Policy VII. Suppose that build is profiled: then it is documented. Policy VIII. Suppose that build has a lint backlog smaller than 76: then it is reproducible. Policy IX. Suppose that build is backported: then it is not flaky. Policy X. Suppose that build is benchmarked: then it is reverted. Policy XI. Suppose that build has a defect tally no higher than 55: then it is benchmarked. Policy XII. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is not tagged. Policy XIII. Suppose that build is tested: then it is not signed. Policy XIV. Suppose that build has a lint backlog no lower than 76: then it is signed. Policy XV. Suppose that build is tested: then it is profiled. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy XIII beats Policy XIV. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy XII. Question: Which choice is right for Basalt?", "options": ["is minified", "is merged", "is reverted", "is documented", "has a security advisory"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a security advisory", "unit_id": "u012589", "pair_id": "u012589-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/14/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012589-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "07d68969a834cad9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a7", "a8", "a15", "a4"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u012589-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice is not localized. Basalt is fuzzed. Basalt is localized. Basalt is not tested. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 30. Pumice has a lint backlog of 29. Pumice is backported. Gneiss has a defect tally of 41. Zircon is not backported. Basalt is backported.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is signed, it then is minified. #2 Each time a build is localized, it then is flaky. #3 Each time a build is reproducible, it then is merged. #4 Each time a build is profiled, it then has no security advisory. #5 Each time a build is flaky, it then has a security advisory. #6 Each time a build has a lint backlog of 15 or above, it then is tagged. #7 Each time a build is profiled, it then is documented. #8 Each time a build has a lint backlog less than 76, it then is reproducible. #9 Each time a build is backported, it then is not flaky. #10 Each time a build is benchmarked, it then is reverted. #11 Each time a build has a defect tally of 55 or below, it then is benchmarked. #12 Each time a build is fuzzed, it then is not tagged. #13 Each time a build is tested, it then is not signed. #14 Each time a build has a lint backlog of 76 or above, it then is signed. #15 Each time a build is not tested, it then is profiled. #5 yields to #4. #9 yields to #2. #14 yields to #13. #12 yields to #6. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Basalt?", "options": ["is minified", "is merged", "is reverted", "is documented", "has a security advisory"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is documented", "unit_id": "u012589", "pair_id": "u012589-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/14/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012589-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c0427890daf4389f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a7", "a8", "a15", "a4"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u012589-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice is not localized. Basalt is fuzzed. Basalt is localized. Basalt is not tested. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 30. Pumice has a lint backlog of 29. Pumice is backported. Gneiss has a defect tally of 41. Zircon is not backported. Basalt is backported.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is signed, it then is minified. #2 Each time a build is localized, it then is flaky. #3 Each time a build is reproducible, it then is merged. #4 Each time a build is profiled, it then has no security advisory. #5 Each time a build is flaky, it then has a security advisory. #6 Each time a build has a lint backlog of 15 or above, it then is tagged. #7 Each time a build is profiled, it then is documented. #8 Each time a build has a lint backlog less than 76, it then is reproducible. #9 Each time a build is backported, it then is not flaky. #10 Each time a build is benchmarked, it then is reverted. #11 Each time a build has a defect tally of 55 or below, it then is benchmarked. #12 Each time a build is fuzzed, it then is not tagged. #13 Each time a build is tested, it then is not signed. #14 Each time a build has a lint backlog of 76 or above, it then is signed. #15 Each time a build is tested, it then is profiled. #5 yields to #4. #9 yields to #2. #14 yields to #13. #12 yields to #6. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Basalt?", "options": ["is minified", "is merged", "is reverted", "is documented", "has a security advisory"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a security advisory", "unit_id": "u012589", "pair_id": "u012589-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/14/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012589-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "07d68969a834cad9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a7", "a8", "a15", "a4"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u012649-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has a latency budget of 77. Sierra has a CPU quota of 80. Sierra has a replica count of 58. Sierra has a latency budget of 78. Sierra is not virtualized. Borealis has a CPU quota of 30. Vesper has a CPU quota of 92. Borealis has a latency budget of 16. Borealis has a memory allotment of 43. Borealis has a replica count of 16. Vesper is not virtualized.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is isolated provided that it has a memory allotment exceeding 28. Section 2: a workload has a snapshot provided that it has a replica count lower than 59. Section 3: a workload has a public endpoint provided that it has a CPU quota of 43 or higher. Section 4: a workload is not provisioned provided that it is virtualized. Section 5: a workload is monitored provided that it has a memory allotment of 28 or lower. Section 6: a workload has a dedicated host provided that it has a CPU quota lower than 43. Section 7: a workload has a failover node provided that it has a latency budget lower than 77. Question: Which statement fits Sierra?", "options": ["has a public endpoint", "is isolated", "is monitored", "has a dedicated host"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a public endpoint", "unit_id": "u012649", "pair_id": "u012649-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012649-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "be33ee13232700ca", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a10", "a11", "a0", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012649-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has a latency budget of 77. Sierra has a CPU quota of 80. Sierra has a replica count of 58. Sierra has a latency budget of 35. Sierra is not virtualized. Borealis has a CPU quota of 30. Vesper has a CPU quota of 92. Borealis has a latency budget of 16. Borealis has a memory allotment of 43. Borealis has a replica count of 16. Vesper is not virtualized.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is isolated provided that it has a memory allotment exceeding 28. Section 2: a workload has a snapshot provided that it has a replica count lower than 59. Section 3: a workload has a public endpoint provided that it has a CPU quota of 43 or higher. Section 4: a workload is not provisioned provided that it is virtualized. Section 5: a workload is monitored provided that it has a memory allotment of 28 or lower. Section 6: a workload has a dedicated host provided that it has a CPU quota lower than 43. Section 7: a workload has a failover node provided that it has a latency budget lower than 77. Question: Which statement fits Sierra?", "options": ["has a public endpoint", "is isolated", "is monitored", "has a dedicated host"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a public endpoint", "unit_id": "u012649", "pair_id": "u012649-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012649-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "0e278be3a3c14977", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a10", "a11", "a0", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012649-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has a latency budget of 77. Sierra has a CPU quota of 80. Sierra has a replica count of 58. Sierra has a latency budget of 78. Sierra is not virtualized. Borealis has a CPU quota of 30. Vesper has a CPU quota of 92. Borealis has a latency budget of 16. Borealis has a memory allotment of 43. Borealis has a replica count of 16. Vesper is not virtualized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload has a memory allotment greater than 28, it then is isolated. #2 Each time a workload has a replica count less than 59, it then has a snapshot. #3 Each time a workload has a CPU quota of 43 or above, it then has a public endpoint. #4 Each time a workload is virtualized, it then is not provisioned. #5 Each time a workload has a memory allotment of 28 or below, it then is monitored. #6 Each time a workload has a CPU quota less than 43, it then has a dedicated host. #7 Each time a workload has a latency budget less than 77, it then has a failover node. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Sierra?", "options": ["has a public endpoint", "is isolated", "is monitored", "has a dedicated host"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a public endpoint", "unit_id": "u012649", "pair_id": "u012649-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012649-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "be33ee13232700ca", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a10", "a11", "a0", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012649-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has a latency budget of 77. Sierra has a CPU quota of 80. Sierra has a replica count of 58. Sierra has a latency budget of 35. Sierra is not virtualized. Borealis has a CPU quota of 30. Vesper has a CPU quota of 92. Borealis has a latency budget of 16. Borealis has a memory allotment of 43. Borealis has a replica count of 16. Vesper is not virtualized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload has a memory allotment greater than 28, it then is isolated. #2 Each time a workload has a replica count less than 59, it then has a snapshot. #3 Each time a workload has a CPU quota of 43 or above, it then has a public endpoint. #4 Each time a workload is virtualized, it then is not provisioned. #5 Each time a workload has a memory allotment of 28 or below, it then is monitored. #6 Each time a workload has a CPU quota less than 43, it then has a dedicated host. #7 Each time a workload has a latency budget less than 77, it then has a failover node. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Sierra?", "options": ["has a public endpoint", "is isolated", "is monitored", "has a dedicated host"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a public endpoint", "unit_id": "u012649", "pair_id": "u012649-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012649-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "0e278be3a3c14977", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a10", "a11", "a0", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012656-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma is longitudinal. Gemma has a postdoc. Gemma is peer reviewed. Nashira is not longitudinal. Nashira is not peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed: then it is not translational. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is longitudinal: then it is not a pilot study. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has a postdoc: then it is translational. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed: then it is a pilot study. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed: then it is preregistered. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has a postdoc: then it has no patent filing. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. Question: Which choice is right for Gemma?", "options": ["is preregistered", "is translational"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is preregistered", "unit_id": "u012656", "pair_id": "u012656-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012656-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "7a0f36ec3fff0b7b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a4"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u012656-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma is longitudinal. Gemma has a postdoc. Gemma is not peer reviewed. Nashira is not longitudinal. Nashira is not peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed: then it is not translational. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is longitudinal: then it is not a pilot study. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has a postdoc: then it is translational. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed: then it is a pilot study. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed: then it is preregistered. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has a postdoc: then it has no patent filing. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. Question: Which choice is right for Gemma?", "options": ["is preregistered", "is translational"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is translational", "unit_id": "u012656", "pair_id": "u012656-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012656-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "dcecf1a420c56cb8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a4"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u012671-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is not subrogated. Yara is not reinstated. Yara has no beneficiary. Zdenek has a beneficiary. Yara is not reimbursed. Una has no roadside assistance. Yara has roadside assistance. Una is not reimbursed. Zdenek is not appraised. Yara is appraised. Una has a beneficiary. Yara is litigated. Una is appraised. Una is reinstated. Zdenek is not reinstated. Yara has no rider. Zdenek has no roadside assistance. Zdenek has no rider.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a dashcam, then it is not lapsed. (2) If a policyholder is subrogated, then it is not a claimant. (3) If a policyholder is reimbursed, then it is not indemnified. (4) If a policyholder is appraised, then it has no adjuster. (5) If a policyholder has flood coverage, then it has no dashcam. (6) If a policyholder is subrogated, then it is covered. (7) If a policyholder has roadside assistance, then it is a claimant. (8) If a policyholder is subrogated, then it is not uninsurable. (9) If a policyholder is reinstated, then it is indemnified. (10) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it has flood coverage. (11) If a policyholder has a rider, then it is uninsurable. (12) If a policyholder is litigated, then it is not bundled. (13) If a policyholder is subrogated, then it is not covered. (14) If a policyholder is a claimant, then it has an adjuster. (15) If a policyholder is indemnified, then it has a dashcam. (16) If a policyholder has no adjuster, then it is lapsed. When (7) and (2) clash, (7) prevails. When (4) and (14) clash, (4) prevails. When (8) and (11) clash, (8) prevails. When (13) and (6) clash, (13) prevails. When (9) and (3) clash, (9) prevails. When (16) and (1) clash, (16) prevails. When (15) and (5) clash, (15) prevails. Question: Is it true that Una is lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u012671", "pair_id": "u012671-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/15/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012671-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d8002e391d9a5350", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012671-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is not subrogated. Yara is not reinstated. Yara has no beneficiary. Zdenek has a beneficiary. Yara is not reimbursed. Una has no roadside assistance. Yara has roadside assistance. Una is not reimbursed. Zdenek is not appraised. Yara is appraised. Una has a beneficiary. Yara is litigated. Una is appraised. Una is reinstated. Zdenek is not reinstated. Yara has no rider. Zdenek has no roadside assistance. Zdenek has no rider.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a dashcam, then it is not lapsed. (2) If a policyholder is subrogated, then it is not a claimant. (3) If a policyholder is reimbursed, then it is not indemnified. (4) If a policyholder is appraised, then it has no adjuster. (5) If a policyholder has flood coverage, then it has no dashcam. (6) If a policyholder is subrogated, then it is covered. (7) If a policyholder has roadside assistance, then it is a claimant. (8) If a policyholder is subrogated, then it is not uninsurable. (9) If a policyholder is reinstated, then it is indemnified. (10) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it has flood coverage. (11) If a policyholder has a rider, then it is uninsurable. (12) If a policyholder is litigated, then it is not bundled. (13) If a policyholder is subrogated, then it is not covered. (14) If a policyholder is a claimant, then it has an adjuster. (15) If a policyholder is indemnified, then it has a dashcam. (16) If a policyholder has an adjuster, then it is lapsed. When (7) and (2) clash, (7) prevails. When (4) and (14) clash, (4) prevails. When (8) and (11) clash, (8) prevails. When (13) and (6) clash, (13) prevails. When (9) and (3) clash, (9) prevails. When (16) and (1) clash, (16) prevails. When (15) and (5) clash, (15) prevails. Question: Is it true that Una is lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012671", "pair_id": "u012671-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/15/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012671-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "d17952b46593e8c3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012671-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is not subrogated. Yara is not reinstated. Yara has no beneficiary. Zdenek has a beneficiary. Yara is not reimbursed. Una has no roadside assistance. Yara has roadside assistance. Una is not reimbursed. Zdenek is not appraised. Yara is appraised. Una has a beneficiary. Yara is litigated. Una is appraised. Una is reinstated. Zdenek is not reinstated. Yara has no rider. Zdenek has no roadside assistance. Zdenek has no rider.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a dashcam, it also is not lapsed. Clause 2: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is not a claimant. Clause 3: once any policyholder is reimbursed, it also is not indemnified. Clause 4: once any policyholder is appraised, it also has no adjuster. Clause 5: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also has no dashcam. Clause 6: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is covered. Clause 7: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also is a claimant. Clause 8: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is not uninsurable. Clause 9: once any policyholder is reinstated, it also is indemnified. Clause 10: once any policyholder has a beneficiary, it also has flood coverage. Clause 11: once any policyholder has a rider, it also is uninsurable. Clause 12: once any policyholder is litigated, it also is not bundled. Clause 13: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is not covered. Clause 14: once any policyholder is a claimant, it also has an adjuster. Clause 15: once any policyholder is indemnified, it also has a dashcam. Clause 16: once any policyholder has no adjuster, it also is lapsed. Clause 7 overrides Clause 2. Clause 4 overrides Clause 14. Clause 8 overrides Clause 11. Clause 13 overrides Clause 6. Clause 9 overrides Clause 3. Clause 16 overrides Clause 1. Clause 15 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Una is lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u012671", "pair_id": "u012671-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/15/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012671-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d8002e391d9a5350", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012671-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is not subrogated. Yara is not reinstated. Yara has no beneficiary. Zdenek has a beneficiary. Yara is not reimbursed. Una has no roadside assistance. Yara has roadside assistance. Una is not reimbursed. Zdenek is not appraised. Yara is appraised. Una has a beneficiary. Yara is litigated. Una is appraised. Una is reinstated. Zdenek is not reinstated. Yara has no rider. Zdenek has no roadside assistance. Zdenek has no rider.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a dashcam, it also is not lapsed. Clause 2: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is not a claimant. Clause 3: once any policyholder is reimbursed, it also is not indemnified. Clause 4: once any policyholder is appraised, it also has no adjuster. Clause 5: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also has no dashcam. Clause 6: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is covered. Clause 7: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also is a claimant. Clause 8: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is not uninsurable. Clause 9: once any policyholder is reinstated, it also is indemnified. Clause 10: once any policyholder has a beneficiary, it also has flood coverage. Clause 11: once any policyholder has a rider, it also is uninsurable. Clause 12: once any policyholder is litigated, it also is not bundled. Clause 13: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is not covered. Clause 14: once any policyholder is a claimant, it also has an adjuster. Clause 15: once any policyholder is indemnified, it also has a dashcam. Clause 16: once any policyholder has an adjuster, it also is lapsed. Clause 7 overrides Clause 2. Clause 4 overrides Clause 14. Clause 8 overrides Clause 11. Clause 13 overrides Clause 6. Clause 9 overrides Clause 3. Clause 16 overrides Clause 1. Clause 15 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Una is lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012671", "pair_id": "u012671-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/15/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012671-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "d17952b46593e8c3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012692-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is not diabetic. Xenia is asthmatic. Xenia has a pain level of 54. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 32. Xenia is not diabetic. Elif is admitted. Elif is not diabetic. Aurel has a fever reading of 70. Yusuf has a chaperone. Yusuf is fasting. Xenia is fasting. Yusuf has a fever reading of 28. Elif has a pain level of 69. Yusuf is asthmatic.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 15 while has a pain level at or above 66 while is diabetic, thus it is discharged. Provision 2: when the patient here has a chaperone, thus it is referred. Provision 3: when the patient here has a chaperone, thus it is not hypertensive. Provision 4: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 15 while has a pain level beneath 66 while is admitted, thus it has a pacemaker. Provision 5: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 15 while is not asthmatic while is fasting, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 6: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 15 while has a fever reading beyond 46 while is symptomatic, thus it is anemic. Provision 7: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 15 while is asthmatic, thus it is postoperative. Question: Which one describes Yusuf?", "options": ["is discharged", "is anemic", "is postoperative", "has a pacemaker", "is waitlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is postoperative", "unit_id": "u012692", "pair_id": "u012692-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012692-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "4ec797dfe29a2c43", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a1", "a4", "a13"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u012692-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is not diabetic. Xenia is asthmatic. Xenia has a pain level of 54. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 32. Xenia is not diabetic. Elif is admitted. Elif is not diabetic. Aurel has a fever reading of 70. Yusuf has no chaperone. Yusuf is fasting. Xenia is fasting. Yusuf has a fever reading of 28. Elif has a pain level of 69. Yusuf is asthmatic.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 15 while has a pain level at or above 66 while is diabetic, thus it is discharged. Provision 2: when the patient here has a chaperone, thus it is referred. Provision 3: when the patient here has a chaperone, thus it is not hypertensive. Provision 4: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 15 while has a pain level beneath 66 while is admitted, thus it has a pacemaker. Provision 5: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 15 while is not asthmatic while is fasting, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 6: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 15 while has a fever reading beyond 46 while is symptomatic, thus it is anemic. Provision 7: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 15 while is asthmatic, thus it is postoperative. Question: Which one describes Yusuf?", "options": ["is discharged", "is anemic", "is postoperative", "has a pacemaker", "is waitlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is postoperative", "unit_id": "u012692", "pair_id": "u012692-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012692-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "7a3033321360c69e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a1", "a4", "a13"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u012692-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is not diabetic. Xenia is asthmatic. Xenia has a pain level of 54. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 32. Xenia is not diabetic. Elif is admitted. Elif is not diabetic. Aurel has a fever reading of 70. Yusuf has a chaperone. Yusuf is fasting. Xenia is fasting. Yusuf has a fever reading of 28. Elif has a pain level of 69. Yusuf is asthmatic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 15 and further has a pain level of minimum 66 and further is diabetic, it thereby is discharged. Point B. If said patient has a chaperone, it thereby is referred. Point C. If said patient has a chaperone, it thereby is not hypertensive. Point D. If said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 15 and further has a pain level short of 66 and further is admitted, it thereby has a pacemaker. Point E. If said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 15 and further is not asthmatic and further is fasting, it thereby is waitlisted. Point F. If said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 15 and further has a fever reading in excess of 46 and further is symptomatic, it thereby is anemic. Point G. If said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 15 and further is asthmatic, it thereby is postoperative. Question: Which choice is true for Yusuf?", "options": ["is discharged", "is anemic", "is postoperative", "has a pacemaker", "is waitlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is postoperative", "unit_id": "u012692", "pair_id": "u012692-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012692-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "4ec797dfe29a2c43", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a1", "a4", "a13"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u012692-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is not diabetic. Xenia is asthmatic. Xenia has a pain level of 54. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 32. Xenia is not diabetic. Elif is admitted. Elif is not diabetic. Aurel has a fever reading of 70. Yusuf has no chaperone. Yusuf is fasting. Xenia is fasting. Yusuf has a fever reading of 28. Elif has a pain level of 69. Yusuf is asthmatic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 15 and further has a pain level of minimum 66 and further is diabetic, it thereby is discharged. Point B. If said patient has a chaperone, it thereby is referred. Point C. If said patient has a chaperone, it thereby is not hypertensive. Point D. If said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 15 and further has a pain level short of 66 and further is admitted, it thereby has a pacemaker. Point E. If said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 15 and further is not asthmatic and further is fasting, it thereby is waitlisted. Point F. If said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 15 and further has a fever reading in excess of 46 and further is symptomatic, it thereby is anemic. Point G. If said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 15 and further is asthmatic, it thereby is postoperative. Question: Which choice is true for Yusuf?", "options": ["is discharged", "is anemic", "is postoperative", "has a pacemaker", "is waitlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is postoperative", "unit_id": "u012692", "pair_id": "u012692-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012692-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "7a3033321360c69e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a1", "a4", "a13"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u012692-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is not diabetic. Xenia is asthmatic. Xenia has a pain level of 54. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 32. Xenia is not diabetic. Elif is admitted. Elif is not diabetic. Aurel has a fever reading of 70. Yusuf has a chaperone. Yusuf is fasting. Xenia is fasting. Yusuf has a fever reading of 28. Elif has a pain level of 69. Yusuf is asthmatic.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient has a mobility rank not below 15 and likewise has a pain level not below 66 and likewise is diabetic, so it is discharged. No. 2 While the given patient has a chaperone, so it is referred. No. 3 While the given patient has a chaperone, so it is not hypertensive. No. 4 While the given patient has a mobility rank not below 15 and likewise has a pain level that falls below 66 and likewise is admitted, so it has a pacemaker. No. 5 While the given patient has a mobility rank not below 15 and likewise is not asthmatic and likewise is fasting, so it is waitlisted. No. 6 While the given patient has a mobility rank not below 15 and likewise has a fever reading that exceeds 46 and likewise is symptomatic, so it is anemic. No. 7 While the given patient has a mobility rank not below 15 and likewise is asthmatic, so it is postoperative. Question: Select what holds for Yusuf: which option?", "options": ["is discharged", "is anemic", "is postoperative", "has a pacemaker", "is waitlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is postoperative", "unit_id": "u012692", "pair_id": "u012692-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012692-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "4ec797dfe29a2c43", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a1", "a4", "a13"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u012692-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is not diabetic. Xenia is asthmatic. Xenia has a pain level of 54. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 32. Xenia is not diabetic. Elif is admitted. Elif is not diabetic. Aurel has a fever reading of 70. Yusuf has no chaperone. Yusuf is fasting. Xenia is fasting. Yusuf has a fever reading of 28. Elif has a pain level of 69. Yusuf is asthmatic.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient has a mobility rank not below 15 and likewise has a pain level not below 66 and likewise is diabetic, so it is discharged. No. 2 While the given patient has a chaperone, so it is referred. No. 3 While the given patient has a chaperone, so it is not hypertensive. No. 4 While the given patient has a mobility rank not below 15 and likewise has a pain level that falls below 66 and likewise is admitted, so it has a pacemaker. No. 5 While the given patient has a mobility rank not below 15 and likewise is not asthmatic and likewise is fasting, so it is waitlisted. No. 6 While the given patient has a mobility rank not below 15 and likewise has a fever reading that exceeds 46 and likewise is symptomatic, so it is anemic. No. 7 While the given patient has a mobility rank not below 15 and likewise is asthmatic, so it is postoperative. Question: Select what holds for Yusuf: which option?", "options": ["is discharged", "is anemic", "is postoperative", "has a pacemaker", "is waitlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is postoperative", "unit_id": "u012692", "pair_id": "u012692-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012692-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "7a3033321360c69e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a1", "a4", "a13"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u012706-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is subrogated. Agata has no dashcam. Xaver is appraised. Una is not reimbursed. Wanda is not appraised. Una has a dashcam. Agata is reimbursed. Xaver has a dashcam. Una is not bundled. Wanda is grandfathered.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is not appraised, it also has a premium discount. Clause 2: once any policyholder is not reimbursed, it also is not disputed. Clause 3: once any policyholder is reimbursed, it also is disputed. Clause 4: once any policyholder is reimbursed, it also has no beneficiary. Clause 5: once any policyholder is not bundled, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is not grandfathered. Clause 3 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has no dashcam. Clause 5 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is subrogated. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is subrogated. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a dashcam. Clause 4 overrides Clause 5. Clause 3 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Agata is disputed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012706", "pair_id": "u012706-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012706-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8240021b5130eef6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012706-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is subrogated. Agata has no dashcam. Xaver is appraised. Una is not reimbursed. Wanda is not appraised. Una has a dashcam. Agata is reimbursed. Xaver has a dashcam. Una is not bundled. Wanda is grandfathered.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is not appraised, it also has a premium discount. Clause 2: once any policyholder is reimbursed, it also is not disputed. Clause 3: once any policyholder is reimbursed, it also is disputed. Clause 4: once any policyholder is reimbursed, it also has no beneficiary. Clause 5: once any policyholder is not bundled, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is not grandfathered. Clause 3 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has no dashcam. Clause 5 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is subrogated. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is subrogated. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a dashcam. Clause 4 overrides Clause 5. Clause 3 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Agata is disputed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012706", "pair_id": "u012706-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012706-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "aea3d541e6f40337", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012706-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is subrogated. Agata has no dashcam. Xaver is appraised. Una is not reimbursed. Wanda is not appraised. Una has a dashcam. Agata is reimbursed. Xaver has a dashcam. Una is not bundled. Wanda is grandfathered.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is not appraised, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item B. When the policyholder is not reimbursed, that policyholder is not disputed. Item C. When the policyholder is reimbursed, that policyholder is disputed. Item D. When the policyholder is reimbursed, that policyholder has no beneficiary. Item E. When the policyholder is not bundled, that policyholder has a beneficiary. Item B is suspended when the policyholder is not grandfathered. Item C is suspended when the policyholder has no dashcam. Item E is suspended when the policyholder is subrogated. Item B is suspended when the policyholder is subrogated. Item B is suspended when the policyholder has a dashcam. Item D outranks Item E. Item C outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Agata is disputed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012706", "pair_id": "u012706-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012706-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8240021b5130eef6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012706-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is subrogated. Agata has no dashcam. Xaver is appraised. Una is not reimbursed. Wanda is not appraised. Una has a dashcam. Agata is reimbursed. Xaver has a dashcam. Una is not bundled. Wanda is grandfathered.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is not appraised, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item B. When the policyholder is reimbursed, that policyholder is not disputed. Item C. When the policyholder is reimbursed, that policyholder is disputed. Item D. When the policyholder is reimbursed, that policyholder has no beneficiary. Item E. When the policyholder is not bundled, that policyholder has a beneficiary. Item B is suspended when the policyholder is not grandfathered. Item C is suspended when the policyholder has no dashcam. Item E is suspended when the policyholder is subrogated. Item B is suspended when the policyholder is subrogated. Item B is suspended when the policyholder has a dashcam. Item D outranks Item E. Item C outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Agata is disputed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012706", "pair_id": "u012706-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012706-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "aea3d541e6f40337", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u012714-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is not waitlisted. Benedek is waitlisted. Benedek has a pain level of 12. Cosima has a pain level of 83. Benedek has a fever reading of 68. Gunnar is waitlisted. Benedek has a chaperone. Gunnar is not vaccinated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is vaccinated, it thereby is asthmatic. Point B. If said patient has a pain level short of 47, it thereby is not asthmatic. Point C. If said patient has a chaperone and further has a pain level of maximum 11, it thereby is not postoperative. Point D. If said patient has a pain level short of 62 and further has a fever reading of minimum 67 and further is waitlisted, it thereby is pregnant. Point E. If said patient has a pain level of maximum 29, it thereby is not pregnant. Point F. If said patient has a chaperone and further has a pain level in excess of 15, it thereby is postoperative. Point D supersedes Point E. Point C supersedes Point F. Point A supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Benedek is postoperative. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012714", "pair_id": "u012714-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012714-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fd26f0a20b6e46d1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012714-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is not waitlisted. Benedek is waitlisted. Benedek has a pain level of 12. Cosima has a pain level of 83. Benedek has a fever reading of 68. Gunnar is waitlisted. Benedek has a chaperone. Gunnar is not vaccinated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is vaccinated, it thereby is asthmatic. Point B. If said patient has a pain level short of 47, it thereby is not asthmatic. Point C. If said patient has a chaperone and further has a pain level of maximum 15, it thereby is not postoperative. Point D. If said patient has a pain level short of 62 and further has a fever reading of minimum 67 and further is waitlisted, it thereby is pregnant. Point E. If said patient has a pain level of maximum 29, it thereby is not pregnant. Point F. If said patient has a chaperone and further has a pain level in excess of 15, it thereby is postoperative. Point D supersedes Point E. Point C supersedes Point F. Point A supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Benedek is postoperative. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012714", "pair_id": "u012714-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012714-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "acf94f8d1c0f81ff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012714-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is not waitlisted. Benedek is waitlisted. Benedek has a pain level of 12. Cosima has a pain level of 83. Benedek has a fever reading of 68. Gunnar is waitlisted. Benedek has a chaperone. Gunnar is not vaccinated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is vaccinated, so it is asthmatic. No. 2 While the given patient has a pain level that falls below 47, so it is not asthmatic. No. 3 While the given patient has a chaperone and likewise has a pain level not above 11, so it is not postoperative. No. 4 While the given patient has a pain level that falls below 62 and likewise has a fever reading not below 67 and likewise is waitlisted, so it is pregnant. No. 5 While the given patient has a pain level not above 29, so it is not pregnant. No. 6 While the given patient has a chaperone and likewise has a pain level that exceeds 15, so it is postoperative. No. 4 wins over No. 5. No. 3 wins over No. 6. No. 1 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Benedek is postoperative\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012714", "pair_id": "u012714-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012714-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fd26f0a20b6e46d1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012714-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is not waitlisted. Benedek is waitlisted. Benedek has a pain level of 12. Cosima has a pain level of 83. Benedek has a fever reading of 68. Gunnar is waitlisted. Benedek has a chaperone. Gunnar is not vaccinated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is vaccinated, so it is asthmatic. No. 2 While the given patient has a pain level that falls below 47, so it is not asthmatic. No. 3 While the given patient has a chaperone and likewise has a pain level not above 15, so it is not postoperative. No. 4 While the given patient has a pain level that falls below 62 and likewise has a fever reading not below 67 and likewise is waitlisted, so it is pregnant. No. 5 While the given patient has a pain level not above 29, so it is not pregnant. No. 6 While the given patient has a chaperone and likewise has a pain level that exceeds 15, so it is postoperative. No. 4 wins over No. 5. No. 3 wins over No. 6. No. 1 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Benedek is postoperative\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012714", "pair_id": "u012714-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012714-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "acf94f8d1c0f81ff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012781-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is not a veteran. Kalle has a portfolio. Mads has no background screening. Noor has a mentor. Noor has no background screening. Kalle is not a veteran. Lotte is not eligible. Noor has a signing bonus. Kalle is not headhunted. Noor is headhunted. Lotte is not headhunted. Kalle has no mentor. Noor has a portfolio. Mads is not a veteran. Kalle has a background screening.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is unionized and has a background screening and is a veteran, then it is not recommended. (2) If a candidate is unionized and has a signing bonus and is freelance, then it is recommended. (3) If a candidate has a mentor and is headhunted and has a portfolio, then it is freelance. (4) If a candidate has a mentor, then it is unionized. (5) If a candidate is eligible, then it is a graduate. Question: Is it true that Noor is not recommended?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012781", "pair_id": "u012781-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012781-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "3d8e13a4cc0c0119", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012781-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is not a veteran. Kalle has a portfolio. Mads has no background screening. Noor has a mentor. Noor has no background screening. Kalle is not a veteran. Noor is eligible. Lotte is not eligible. Noor has a signing bonus. Kalle is not headhunted. Noor is headhunted. Lotte is not headhunted. Kalle has no mentor. Noor has a portfolio. Mads is not a veteran. Kalle has a background screening.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is unionized and has a background screening and is a veteran, then it is not recommended. (2) If a candidate is unionized and has a signing bonus and is freelance, then it is recommended. (3) If a candidate has a mentor and is headhunted and has a portfolio, then it is freelance. (4) If a candidate has a mentor, then it is unionized. (5) If a candidate is eligible, then it is a graduate. Question: Is it true that Noor is not recommended?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012781", "pair_id": "u012781-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012781-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "01ad51521ffe5007", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012833-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ilse is a homeowner. Ilse has a debt ratio of 64. Greta is not a homeowner. Corin has a debt ratio of 48. Corin has collateral. Corin is not audited.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is amortized, thus it has a cosigner. Provision 2: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it is delinquent. Provision 3: when the borrower here is a homeowner, thus it is a depositor. Provision 4: when the borrower here is audited, thus it is employed. Provision 5: when the borrower here is delinquent, thus it has an escrow account. Provision 6: when the borrower here has a debt ratio beneath 87, thus it is refinanced. Provision 7: when the borrower here is amortized, thus it has a mortgage. Provision 8: when the borrower here is a depositor, thus it is amortized. Provision 5 has no effect when the borrower here is a homeowner. Question: Which one describes Corin?", "options": ["has a cosigner", "has an escrow account"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has an escrow account", "unit_id": "u012833", "pair_id": "u012833-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012833-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a698f7f0f8de1475", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012833-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ilse is a homeowner. Ilse has a debt ratio of 64. Greta is not a homeowner. Corin has a debt ratio of 48. Corin has collateral. Corin is not audited. Corin is a homeowner.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is amortized, thus it has a cosigner. Provision 2: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it is delinquent. Provision 3: when the borrower here is a homeowner, thus it is a depositor. Provision 4: when the borrower here is audited, thus it is employed. Provision 5: when the borrower here is delinquent, thus it has an escrow account. Provision 6: when the borrower here has a debt ratio beneath 87, thus it is refinanced. Provision 7: when the borrower here is amortized, thus it has a mortgage. Provision 8: when the borrower here is a depositor, thus it is amortized. Provision 5 has no effect when the borrower here is a homeowner. Question: Which one describes Corin?", "options": ["has a cosigner", "has an escrow account"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a cosigner", "unit_id": "u012833", "pair_id": "u012833-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012833-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "245599e3128caec1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012833-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ilse is a homeowner. Ilse has a debt ratio of 64. Greta is not a homeowner. Corin has a debt ratio of 48. Corin has collateral. Corin is not audited.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby has a cosigner. Point B. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby is delinquent. Point C. If said borrower is a homeowner, it thereby is a depositor. Point D. If said borrower is audited, it thereby is employed. Point E. If said borrower is delinquent, it thereby has an escrow account. Point F. If said borrower has a debt ratio short of 87, it thereby is refinanced. Point G. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby has a mortgage. Point H. If said borrower is a depositor, it thereby is amortized. Point E is cancelled if said borrower is a homeowner. Question: Which choice is true for Corin?", "options": ["has a cosigner", "has an escrow account"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has an escrow account", "unit_id": "u012833", "pair_id": "u012833-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012833-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a698f7f0f8de1475", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012833-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ilse is a homeowner. Ilse has a debt ratio of 64. Greta is not a homeowner. Corin has a debt ratio of 48. Corin has collateral. Corin is not audited. Corin is a homeowner.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby has a cosigner. Point B. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby is delinquent. Point C. If said borrower is a homeowner, it thereby is a depositor. Point D. If said borrower is audited, it thereby is employed. Point E. If said borrower is delinquent, it thereby has an escrow account. Point F. If said borrower has a debt ratio short of 87, it thereby is refinanced. Point G. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby has a mortgage. Point H. If said borrower is a depositor, it thereby is amortized. Point E is cancelled if said borrower is a homeowner. Question: Which choice is true for Corin?", "options": ["has a cosigner", "has an escrow account"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a cosigner", "unit_id": "u012833", "pair_id": "u012833-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012833-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "245599e3128caec1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012833-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ilse is a homeowner. Ilse has a debt ratio of 64. Greta is not a homeowner. Corin has a debt ratio of 48. Corin has collateral. Corin is not audited.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is amortized, so it has a cosigner. No. 2 While the given borrower is refinanced, so it is delinquent. No. 3 While the given borrower is a homeowner, so it is a depositor. No. 4 While the given borrower is audited, so it is employed. No. 5 While the given borrower is delinquent, so it has an escrow account. No. 6 While the given borrower has a debt ratio that falls below 87, so it is refinanced. No. 7 While the given borrower is amortized, so it has a mortgage. No. 8 While the given borrower is a depositor, so it is amortized. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given borrower is a homeowner. Question: Select what holds for Corin: which option?", "options": ["has a cosigner", "has an escrow account"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has an escrow account", "unit_id": "u012833", "pair_id": "u012833-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012833-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a698f7f0f8de1475", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012833-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ilse is a homeowner. Ilse has a debt ratio of 64. Greta is not a homeowner. Corin has a debt ratio of 48. Corin has collateral. Corin is not audited. Corin is a homeowner.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is amortized, so it has a cosigner. No. 2 While the given borrower is refinanced, so it is delinquent. No. 3 While the given borrower is a homeowner, so it is a depositor. No. 4 While the given borrower is audited, so it is employed. No. 5 While the given borrower is delinquent, so it has an escrow account. No. 6 While the given borrower has a debt ratio that falls below 87, so it is refinanced. No. 7 While the given borrower is amortized, so it has a mortgage. No. 8 While the given borrower is a depositor, so it is amortized. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given borrower is a homeowner. Question: Select what holds for Corin: which option?", "options": ["has a cosigner", "has an escrow account"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a cosigner", "unit_id": "u012833", "pair_id": "u012833-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012833-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "245599e3128caec1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012842-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has a latency budget of 18. Vesper is throttled. Vesper is mirrored. Nimbus is mirrored. Vesper has a dedicated host. Nimbus is not throttled. Juno is throttled. Juno has no dedicated host. Juno is replicated. Juno has a latency budget of 35. Vesper has a latency budget of 27. Juno has a replica count of 20.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is not mirrored, it then has a failover node. #2 Each time a workload is isolated, it then is patched. #3 Each time a workload is replicated, it then is not provisioned. #4 Each time a workload is isolated, it then is not patched. #5 Each time a workload has no dedicated host, it then is isolated. #6 Each time a workload is replicated, it then is cached. #6 is set aside if a workload is throttled. #4 is set aside if a workload has a latency budget of 56 or above. #4 is set aside if a workload has a replica count of 54 or above. #3 is set aside if a workload has a dedicated host. #2 is set aside if a workload has a latency budget less than 56. Question: Do the terms above show that Juno is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012842", "pair_id": "u012842-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012842-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5049ea88a932b7fe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012842-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has a latency budget of 58. Vesper is throttled. Vesper is mirrored. Nimbus is mirrored. Vesper has a dedicated host. Nimbus is not throttled. Juno is throttled. Juno has no dedicated host. Juno is replicated. Juno has a latency budget of 35. Vesper has a latency budget of 27. Juno has a replica count of 20.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is not mirrored, it then has a failover node. #2 Each time a workload is isolated, it then is patched. #3 Each time a workload is replicated, it then is not provisioned. #4 Each time a workload is isolated, it then is not patched. #5 Each time a workload has no dedicated host, it then is isolated. #6 Each time a workload is replicated, it then is cached. #6 is set aside if a workload is throttled. #4 is set aside if a workload has a latency budget of 56 or above. #4 is set aside if a workload has a replica count of 54 or above. #3 is set aside if a workload has a dedicated host. #2 is set aside if a workload has a latency budget less than 56. Question: Do the terms above show that Juno is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u012842", "pair_id": "u012842-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012842-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "873224010947dd4c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012852-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has a seniority step of 85. Sigrid is sponsored. Ivo is sponsored. Petra is bonded. Petra has a portfolio. Rune is not bonded. Rune is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a portfolio, it thereby is not eligible. Point B. If said candidate has a portfolio, it thereby is not onboarded. Point C. If said candidate is sponsored, it thereby is onboarded. Point D. If said candidate is bilingual, it thereby is interviewed. Point E. If said candidate has a seniority step short of 45, it thereby is bilingual. Point F. If said candidate is not bonded, it thereby has a background screening. Point G. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is not interviewed. Point C supersedes Point B. Point D supersedes Point G. Question: Statement: Rune is not interviewed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u012852", "pair_id": "u012852-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012852-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6f88504c03860711", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012852-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has a seniority step of 85. Sigrid is sponsored. Ivo is sponsored. Petra is bonded. Petra has a portfolio. Rune is not bonded. Rune is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a portfolio, it thereby is not eligible. Point B. If said candidate has a portfolio, it thereby is not onboarded. Point C. If said candidate is sponsored, it thereby is onboarded. Point D. If said candidate is bilingual, it thereby is interviewed. Point E. If said candidate has a seniority step short of 45, it thereby is bilingual. Point F. If said candidate is bonded, it thereby has a background screening. Point G. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is not interviewed. Point C supersedes Point B. Point D supersedes Point G. Question: Statement: Rune is not interviewed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u012852", "pair_id": "u012852-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012852-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d5e65ab4aecd0071", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012857-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz is not flaky. Quartz has no feature toggle. Quartz is not fuzzed. Quartz is not localized. Gneiss is obsolete. Gneiss is not fuzzed. Gneiss is not linted. Gneiss is not documented. Shale is localized. Shale has a feature toggle. Shale is not flaky. Shale is fuzzed. Quartz is not linted. Gneiss is localized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is flaky, thus it is reverted. Provision 2: when the build here is documented, thus it is not compiled. Provision 3: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it has no migration script. Provision 4: when the build here is localized, thus it is not reverted. Provision 5: when the build here is linted, thus it is tagged. Provision 6: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is experimental. Provision 7: when the build here is benchmarked, thus it is notarized. Provision 8: when the build here is reverted, thus it is benchmarked. Provision 9: when the build here is flaky, thus it is not backported. Provision 10: when the build here is experimental, thus it is backported. Provision 11: when the build here is fuzzed, thus it is minified. Provision 12: when the build here is obsolete, thus it has a migration script. Provision 7 has no effect when the build here is fuzzed. Provision 7 has no effect when the build here is obsolete. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 12 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 9. Question: Which one describes Gneiss?", "options": ["is backported", "is notarized"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is backported", "unit_id": "u012857", "pair_id": "u012857-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012857-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "15d67057f556ae44", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a1"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u012857-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz is not flaky. Quartz has no feature toggle. Quartz is not fuzzed. Gneiss is flaky. Quartz is not localized. Gneiss is obsolete. Gneiss is not fuzzed. Gneiss is not linted. Gneiss is not documented. Shale is localized. Shale has a feature toggle. Shale is not flaky. Shale is fuzzed. Quartz is not linted. Gneiss is localized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is flaky, thus it is reverted. Provision 2: when the build here is documented, thus it is not compiled. Provision 3: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it has no migration script. Provision 4: when the build here is localized, thus it is not reverted. Provision 5: when the build here is linted, thus it is tagged. Provision 6: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is experimental. Provision 7: when the build here is benchmarked, thus it is notarized. Provision 8: when the build here is reverted, thus it is benchmarked. Provision 9: when the build here is flaky, thus it is not backported. Provision 10: when the build here is experimental, thus it is backported. Provision 11: when the build here is fuzzed, thus it is minified. Provision 12: when the build here is obsolete, thus it has a migration script. Provision 7 has no effect when the build here is fuzzed. Provision 7 has no effect when the build here is obsolete. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 12 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 9. Question: Which one describes Gneiss?", "options": ["is backported", "is notarized"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is backported", "unit_id": "u012857", "pair_id": "u012857-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012857-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "419721795ddb4624", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a1"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u012884-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor is recommended. Noor has a notice period of 31. Noor has a commute radius of 66. Noor is unionized. Noor is bilingual. Noor is relocating. Kalle is unionized. Noor has a signing bonus. Kalle has a commute radius of 5. Noor has an aptitude quotient of 29.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is interviewed provided that it is onboarded as well as has a seniority step of 56 or higher. Section 2: a candidate is sponsored provided that it is onboarded as well as is bonded. Section 3: a candidate is bonded provided that it has a commute radius of 27 or lower. Section 4: a candidate is onboarded provided that it is headhunted as well as is relocating. Section 5: a candidate is not bonded provided that it is recommended. Section 6: a candidate is headhunted provided that it has a notice period of 44 or lower as well as has a signing bonus. Section 7: a candidate has a background screening provided that it is onboarded as well as has an aptitude quotient lower than 32. Section 8: a candidate has no background screening provided that it is bonded. Section 9: a candidate has no visa provided that it is unionized as well as has a commute radius of 4 or higher. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 7. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Which statement fits Noor?", "options": ["is sponsored", "has a background screening", "is interviewed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a background screening", "unit_id": "u012884", "pair_id": "u012884-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012884-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea7892875718d75a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a3", "a9"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u012884-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor is recommended. Noor has a notice period of 31. Noor has a commute radius of 66. Noor is unionized. Noor is bilingual. Noor is relocating. Kalle is unionized. Noor has a signing bonus. Kalle has a commute radius of 5. Noor has an aptitude quotient of 29.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is interviewed provided that it is onboarded as well as has a seniority step of 56 or higher. Section 2: a candidate is sponsored provided that it is onboarded as well as is bonded. Section 3: a candidate is bonded provided that it has a commute radius of 27 or lower. Section 4: a candidate is onboarded provided that it is headhunted as well as is relocating. Section 5: a candidate is not bonded provided that it is recommended. Section 6: a candidate is headhunted provided that it has a notice period of 44 or lower as well as has a signing bonus. Section 7: a candidate has a background screening provided that it is onboarded as well as has an aptitude quotient lower than 32. Section 8: a candidate has no background screening provided that it is bonded. Section 9: a candidate has no visa provided that it is unionized as well as has a commute radius of 80 or higher. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 7. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Which statement fits Noor?", "options": ["is sponsored", "has a background screening", "is interviewed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a background screening", "unit_id": "u012884", "pair_id": "u012884-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u012884-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f0f9b678c5a62e63", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a3", "a9"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u012904-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xaver has no premium discount. Celeste has no premium discount. Fabian has no premium discount. Fabian has no dashcam. Celeste is reimbursed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has a beneficiary provided that it is a claimant. Section 2: a policyholder is lapsed provided that it has no deductible waiver. Section 3: a policyholder is appraised provided that it is not litigated. Section 4: a policyholder is grandfathered provided that it is lapsed. Section 5: a policyholder is bundled provided that it is not lapsed. Section 6: a policyholder has no flood coverage provided that it has a dashcam. Section 7: a policyholder is indemnified provided that it has a premium discount. Section 8: a policyholder is not litigated provided that it is not uninsurable. Section 9: a policyholder is not uninsurable provided that it is not reimbursed. Section 10: a policyholder is a claimant provided that it has no flood coverage. Section 11: a policyholder has no deductible waiver provided that it is reimbursed. Question: Which statement fits Celeste?", "options": ["is grandfathered", "has a beneficiary", "is appraised"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is grandfathered", "unit_id": "u012904", "pair_id": "u012904-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012904-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "7c73e953eedbd2f7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a11", "a12"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012904-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xaver has no premium discount. Celeste has no premium discount. Fabian has no premium discount. Fabian has no dashcam. Celeste is not reimbursed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has a beneficiary provided that it is a claimant. Section 2: a policyholder is lapsed provided that it has no deductible waiver. Section 3: a policyholder is appraised provided that it is not litigated. Section 4: a policyholder is grandfathered provided that it is lapsed. Section 5: a policyholder is bundled provided that it is not lapsed. Section 6: a policyholder has no flood coverage provided that it has a dashcam. Section 7: a policyholder is indemnified provided that it has a premium discount. Section 8: a policyholder is not litigated provided that it is not uninsurable. Section 9: a policyholder is not uninsurable provided that it is not reimbursed. Section 10: a policyholder is a claimant provided that it has no flood coverage. Section 11: a policyholder has no deductible waiver provided that it is reimbursed. Question: Which statement fits Celeste?", "options": ["is grandfathered", "has a beneficiary", "is appraised"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is appraised", "unit_id": "u012904", "pair_id": "u012904-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012904-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "48bda95fa7a52f51", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a11", "a12"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012904-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xaver has no premium discount. Celeste has no premium discount. Fabian has no premium discount. Fabian has no dashcam. Celeste is reimbursed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is a claimant, it then has a beneficiary. #2 Each time a policyholder has no deductible waiver, it then is lapsed. #3 Each time a policyholder is not litigated, it then is appraised. #4 Each time a policyholder is lapsed, it then is grandfathered. #5 Each time a policyholder is not lapsed, it then is bundled. #6 Each time a policyholder has a dashcam, it then has no flood coverage. #7 Each time a policyholder has a premium discount, it then is indemnified. #8 Each time a policyholder is not uninsurable, it then is not litigated. #9 Each time a policyholder is not reimbursed, it then is not uninsurable. #10 Each time a policyholder has no flood coverage, it then is a claimant. #11 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then has no deductible waiver. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Celeste?", "options": ["is grandfathered", "has a beneficiary", "is appraised"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is grandfathered", "unit_id": "u012904", "pair_id": "u012904-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012904-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "7c73e953eedbd2f7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a11", "a12"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012904-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xaver has no premium discount. Celeste has no premium discount. Fabian has no premium discount. Fabian has no dashcam. Celeste is not reimbursed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is a claimant, it then has a beneficiary. #2 Each time a policyholder has no deductible waiver, it then is lapsed. #3 Each time a policyholder is not litigated, it then is appraised. #4 Each time a policyholder is lapsed, it then is grandfathered. #5 Each time a policyholder is not lapsed, it then is bundled. #6 Each time a policyholder has a dashcam, it then has no flood coverage. #7 Each time a policyholder has a premium discount, it then is indemnified. #8 Each time a policyholder is not uninsurable, it then is not litigated. #9 Each time a policyholder is not reimbursed, it then is not uninsurable. #10 Each time a policyholder has no flood coverage, it then is a claimant. #11 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then has no deductible waiver. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Celeste?", "options": ["is grandfathered", "has a beneficiary", "is appraised"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is appraised", "unit_id": "u012904", "pair_id": "u012904-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012904-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "48bda95fa7a52f51", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a11", "a12"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u012965-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mica is not experimental. Mica is not backported. Feldspar has a security advisory. Feldspar is experimental. Quartz is experimental. Mica is not reproducible. Mica is benchmarked. Quartz is reproducible.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is not benchmarked, thus it has no migration script. Provision 2: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it is reverted. Provision 3: when the build here is not reproducible, thus it is documented. Provision 4: when the build here is reproducible, thus it has a migration script. Provision 5: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is minified. Provision 6: when the build here is experimental, thus it is not documented. Provision 7: when the build here is documented, thus it is flaky. Provision 8: when the build here is backported, thus it has a feature toggle. Provision 9: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is signed. Provision 10: when the build here has no security advisory, thus it is not tagged. Provision 9 has no effect when the build here has a security advisory. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Which one describes Mica?", "options": ["is minified", "is flaky", "is reverted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is flaky", "unit_id": "u012965", "pair_id": "u012965-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012965-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ed11d117fa149559", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a5", "a6", "a8"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u012965-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mica is not experimental. Mica is not backported. Feldspar has a security advisory. Feldspar is experimental. Quartz is experimental. Mica is reproducible. Mica is benchmarked. Quartz is reproducible.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is not benchmarked, thus it has no migration script. Provision 2: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it is reverted. Provision 3: when the build here is not reproducible, thus it is documented. Provision 4: when the build here is reproducible, thus it has a migration script. Provision 5: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is minified. Provision 6: when the build here is experimental, thus it is not documented. Provision 7: when the build here is documented, thus it is flaky. Provision 8: when the build here is backported, thus it has a feature toggle. Provision 9: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is signed. Provision 10: when the build here has no security advisory, thus it is not tagged. Provision 9 has no effect when the build here has a security advisory. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Which one describes Mica?", "options": ["is minified", "is flaky", "is reverted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u012965", "pair_id": "u012965-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u012965-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1dc6dd82560048ec", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a5", "a6", "a8"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u013043-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is compiled. Galena is not fuzzed. Talc is not tested. Shale is not profiled. Shale is tested. Obsidian is not documented. Obsidian is notarized. Galena is not tested. Galena is not profiled. Galena is not versioned. Shale is not documented. Talc is obsolete. Galena is not notarized. Talc is not fuzzed. Galena is not compiled. Obsidian is not obsolete. Shale is versioned. Talc is documented.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is not tested and also is not documented and also is profiled, it also is flaky. Clause 2: once any build is not tested and also is not compiled and also is profiled, it also is not flaky. Clause 3: once any build is obsolete and also is notarized, it also has no migration script. Clause 4: once any build is versioned, it also is backported. Clause 5: once any build is fuzzed, it also is not benchmarked. Question: Does it follow that Galena is not flaky?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013043", "pair_id": "u013043-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013043-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "751f0c1ac236dabe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013043-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is compiled. Galena is not fuzzed. Talc is not tested. Shale is not profiled. Shale is tested. Obsidian is not documented. Obsidian is notarized. Galena is not tested. Galena is not profiled. Galena is not versioned. Shale is not documented. Talc is obsolete. Galena is not notarized. Talc is not fuzzed. Galena is not compiled. Obsidian is not obsolete. Shale is versioned. Talc is documented.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is not tested and also is not documented and also is profiled, it also is flaky. Clause 2: once any build is not tested and also is not compiled and also is profiled, it also is not flaky. Clause 3: once any build is obsolete and also is notarized, it also has no migration script. Clause 4: once any build is versioned, it also is backported. Clause 5: once any build is not fuzzed, it also is not benchmarked. Question: Does it follow that Galena is not flaky?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013043", "pair_id": "u013043-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013043-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "7a20324221372866", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013062-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not tracked. Liesel is tracked. Quentin has a delivery window of 95. Nandor is registered. Liesel is registered. Quentin is tracked. Quentin is not registered. Saskia has a delivery window of 30. Nandor has a delivery window of 90.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel has a delivery window below 39, then it is oversized. (2) If a parcel is not registered, then it is hazardous. (3) If a parcel is oversized, then it is undeliverable. (4) If a parcel is undeliverable, then it has a locker slot. (5) If a parcel is hazardous, then it is weighed. (6) If a parcel is tracked, then it is delayed. (7) If a parcel is weighed, then it has no locker slot. Question: Is it true that Quentin has a locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013062", "pair_id": "u013062-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013062-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5469d1503704fdde", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013062-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not tracked. Liesel is tracked. Quentin has a delivery window of 95. Nandor is registered. Liesel is registered. Quentin is tracked. Quentin is not registered. Saskia has a delivery window of 30. Nandor has a delivery window of 90.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel has a delivery window below 39, then it is oversized. (2) If a parcel is registered, then it is hazardous. (3) If a parcel is oversized, then it is undeliverable. (4) If a parcel is undeliverable, then it has a locker slot. (5) If a parcel is hazardous, then it is weighed. (6) If a parcel is tracked, then it is delayed. (7) If a parcel is weighed, then it has no locker slot. Question: Is it true that Quentin has a locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013062", "pair_id": "u013062-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013062-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "6545c7a03cc096cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013062-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not tracked. Liesel is tracked. Quentin has a delivery window of 95. Nandor is registered. Liesel is registered. Quentin is tracked. Quentin is not registered. Saskia has a delivery window of 30. Nandor has a delivery window of 90.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel has a delivery window under 39, it also is oversized. Clause 2: once any parcel is not registered, it also is hazardous. Clause 3: once any parcel is oversized, it also is undeliverable. Clause 4: once any parcel is undeliverable, it also has a locker slot. Clause 5: once any parcel is hazardous, it also is weighed. Clause 6: once any parcel is tracked, it also is delayed. Clause 7: once any parcel is weighed, it also has no locker slot. Question: Does it follow that Quentin has a locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013062", "pair_id": "u013062-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013062-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5469d1503704fdde", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013062-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not tracked. Liesel is tracked. Quentin has a delivery window of 95. Nandor is registered. Liesel is registered. Quentin is tracked. Quentin is not registered. Saskia has a delivery window of 30. Nandor has a delivery window of 90.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel has a delivery window under 39, it also is oversized. Clause 2: once any parcel is registered, it also is hazardous. Clause 3: once any parcel is oversized, it also is undeliverable. Clause 4: once any parcel is undeliverable, it also has a locker slot. Clause 5: once any parcel is hazardous, it also is weighed. Clause 6: once any parcel is tracked, it also is delayed. Clause 7: once any parcel is weighed, it also has no locker slot. Question: Does it follow that Quentin has a locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013062", "pair_id": "u013062-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013062-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "6545c7a03cc096cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013089-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not a graduate. Lotte is not headhunted. Lotte is seasoned. Lotte is probationary. Jasna is headhunted. Jasna has no background screening. Lotte has no portfolio.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is a graduate: then it is a veteran. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is eligible plus is seasoned: then it is interviewed. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is probationary plus is headhunted: then it is not onboarded. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is eligible plus has a background screening plus is a veteran: then it is not interviewed. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is not headhunted: then it is eligible. Policy IV is waived if that candidate has a portfolio. Policy III is waived if that candidate has a background screening. Question: Is it so that Lotte is interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013089", "pair_id": "u013089-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013089-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0744b26f619bb489", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u013089-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not a graduate. Lotte is not headhunted. Lotte is seasoned. Lotte is probationary. Jasna is headhunted. Jasna has no background screening. Lotte has no portfolio.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is a graduate: then it is a veteran. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is eligible plus is seasoned: then it is interviewed. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is probationary plus is headhunted: then it is not onboarded. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is eligible plus has a background screening plus is a veteran: then it is not interviewed. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it is eligible. Policy IV is waived if that candidate has a portfolio. Policy III is waived if that candidate has a background screening. Question: Is it so that Lotte is interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013089", "pair_id": "u013089-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013089-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b9a53a5f55a00362", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u013089-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not a graduate. Lotte is not headhunted. Lotte is seasoned. Lotte is probationary. Jasna is headhunted. Jasna has no background screening. Lotte has no portfolio.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is a graduate, it then is a veteran. #2 Each time a candidate is eligible and additionally is seasoned, it then is interviewed. #3 Each time a candidate is probationary and additionally is headhunted, it then is not onboarded. #4 Each time a candidate is eligible and additionally has a background screening and additionally is a veteran, it then is not interviewed. #5 Each time a candidate is not headhunted, it then is eligible. #4 is set aside if a candidate has a portfolio. #3 is set aside if a candidate has a background screening. Question: Do the terms above show that Lotte is interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013089", "pair_id": "u013089-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013089-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0744b26f619bb489", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u013089-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not a graduate. Lotte is not headhunted. Lotte is seasoned. Lotte is probationary. Jasna is headhunted. Jasna has no background screening. Lotte has no portfolio.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is a graduate, it then is a veteran. #2 Each time a candidate is eligible and additionally is seasoned, it then is interviewed. #3 Each time a candidate is probationary and additionally is headhunted, it then is not onboarded. #4 Each time a candidate is eligible and additionally has a background screening and additionally is a veteran, it then is not interviewed. #5 Each time a candidate is headhunted, it then is eligible. #4 is set aside if a candidate has a portfolio. #3 is set aside if a candidate has a background screening. Question: Do the terms above show that Lotte is interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013089", "pair_id": "u013089-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013089-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b9a53a5f55a00362", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u013094-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is bedridden. Benedek is admitted. Benedek has a mobility rank of 48.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is not admitted, then it is contagious. (2) If a patient has a mobility rank of at least 84, then it is symptomatic. (2) is void if the patient is admitted. (1) is void if the patient is bedridden. Question: Is it true that Benedek is not rescheduled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013094", "pair_id": "u013094-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013094-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5c4af3f1f192ad9a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013094-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is rescheduled. Benedek is bedridden. Benedek is admitted. Benedek has a mobility rank of 48.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is not admitted, then it is contagious. (2) If a patient has a mobility rank of at least 84, then it is symptomatic. (2) is void if the patient is admitted. (1) is void if the patient is bedridden. Question: Is it true that Benedek is not rescheduled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013094", "pair_id": "u013094-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013094-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "305d32ae9e3ce715", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013094-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is bedridden. Benedek is admitted. Benedek has a mobility rank of 48.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is not admitted, that patient is contagious. Item B. When the patient has a mobility rank of no less than 84, that patient is symptomatic. Item B is suspended when the patient is admitted. Item A is suspended when the patient is bedridden. Question: Can one infer that Benedek is not rescheduled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013094", "pair_id": "u013094-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013094-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5c4af3f1f192ad9a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013094-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is rescheduled. Benedek is bedridden. Benedek is admitted. Benedek has a mobility rank of 48.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is not admitted, that patient is contagious. Item B. When the patient has a mobility rank of no less than 84, that patient is symptomatic. Item B is suspended when the patient is admitted. Item A is suspended when the patient is bedridden. Question: Can one infer that Benedek is not rescheduled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013094", "pair_id": "u013094-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013094-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "305d32ae9e3ce715", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013120-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel is not sedated. Vilja is fasting. Aurel is not bedridden. Vilja is not anemic. Vilja is sedated. Yusuf is sedated. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Aurel is not rescheduled. Aurel is not referred. Vilja is triaged. Yusuf is not referred. Vilja is rescheduled. Vilja has no pacemaker. Yusuf has a pacemaker. Yusuf is not anemic. Vilja is not bedridden.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is pregnant provided that it has an interpreter as well as is rescheduled as well as is fasting. Section 2: a patient is not pregnant provided that it has an interpreter as well as is bedridden. Section 3: a patient is discharged provided that it has a pacemaker. Section 4: a patient has no interpreter provided that it is referred. Section 5: a patient has an interpreter provided that it is not triaged as well as is fasting. Section 4 lapses for a patient if it is anemic as well as is sedated. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Vilja is pregnant. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013120", "pair_id": "u013120-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013120-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3c3a514e8bc1f8f6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013120-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel is not sedated. Vilja is fasting. Aurel is not bedridden. Vilja is not anemic. Vilja is sedated. Yusuf is sedated. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Aurel is not rescheduled. Aurel is not referred. Vilja is triaged. Yusuf is not referred. Vilja is rescheduled. Vilja has no pacemaker. Yusuf has a pacemaker. Yusuf is not anemic. Vilja is not bedridden.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is pregnant provided that it has an interpreter as well as is rescheduled as well as is fasting. Section 2: a patient is not pregnant provided that it has an interpreter as well as is bedridden. Section 3: a patient is discharged provided that it has a pacemaker. Section 4: a patient has no interpreter provided that it is referred. Section 5: a patient has an interpreter provided that it is triaged as well as is fasting. Section 4 lapses for a patient if it is anemic as well as is sedated. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Vilja is pregnant. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013120", "pair_id": "u013120-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013120-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f056fb048b912a12", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013146-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel has a fever reading of 13. Wendel is contagious. Zora has a mobility rank of 76. Zora is sedated. Zora has a fever reading of 65. Xenia is contagious. Wendel has a mobility rank of 3. Elif is contagious. Wendel is not sedated. Xenia has a mobility rank of 75.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is postoperative provided that it has a fever reading of 13 or lower as well as has a mobility rank of 40 or higher. Section 2: a patient is not referred provided that it is contagious as well as is sedated. Section 3: a patient is not postoperative provided that it has a fever reading of 13 or lower as well as has a mobility rank of 40 or higher as well as is sedated. Section 1 lapses for a patient if it has a fever reading of 10 or lower. Question: Wendel is not postoperative. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013146", "pair_id": "u013146-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013146-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c2b2c3137fe38588", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013146-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel has a fever reading of 13. Wendel is contagious. Zora has a mobility rank of 76. Zora is sedated. Zora has a fever reading of 65. Xenia is contagious. Wendel has a mobility rank of 3. Elif is contagious. Wendel is not sedated. Xenia has a mobility rank of 75.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is postoperative provided that it has a fever reading of 13 or lower as well as has a mobility rank lower than 40. Section 2: a patient is not referred provided that it is contagious as well as is sedated. Section 3: a patient is not postoperative provided that it has a fever reading of 13 or lower as well as has a mobility rank of 40 or higher as well as is sedated. Section 1 lapses for a patient if it has a fever reading of 10 or lower. Question: Wendel is not postoperative. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013146", "pair_id": "u013146-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013146-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2895059aed22964a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013152-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is compiled. Talc is not compiled. Schist has a lint backlog of 27. Schist is not reverted. Talc is reverted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a lint backlog beneath 86, thus it is not flaky. Provision 2: when the build here is reverted while is not compiled, thus it has a security advisory. Question: Would it be right to say that Schist is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013152", "pair_id": "u013152-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013152-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "12814bcc7cda6ae7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013152-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not compiled. Talc is not compiled. Schist has a lint backlog of 27. Schist is not reverted. Talc is reverted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a lint backlog beneath 86, thus it is not flaky. Provision 2: when the build here is reverted while is not compiled, thus it has a security advisory. Question: Would it be right to say that Schist is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013152", "pair_id": "u013152-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013152-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "97732cdde547f76d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013152-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is compiled. Talc is not compiled. Schist has a lint backlog of 27. Schist is not reverted. Talc is reverted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a lint backlog that falls below 86, so it is not flaky. No. 2 While the given build is reverted and likewise is not compiled, so it has a security advisory. Question: Is the claim \"Schist is compiled\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013152", "pair_id": "u013152-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013152-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "12814bcc7cda6ae7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013152-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not compiled. Talc is not compiled. Schist has a lint backlog of 27. Schist is not reverted. Talc is reverted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a lint backlog that falls below 86, so it is not flaky. No. 2 While the given build is reverted and likewise is not compiled, so it has a security advisory. Question: Is the claim \"Schist is compiled\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013152", "pair_id": "u013152-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013152-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "97732cdde547f76d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013165-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not a graduate. Mads is not seasoned.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is eligible, then it has a visa. (2) If a candidate is a graduate, then it is bilingual. (3) If a candidate has a visa, then it is not bonded. (4) If a candidate is not seasoned, then it is certified. (5) If a candidate is bilingual, then it is bonded. Question: Is it true that Mads is not bonded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013165", "pair_id": "u013165-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013165-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "02b82dafaf1300a8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013165-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not a graduate. Mads is not seasoned.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is eligible, then it has a visa. (2) If a candidate is a graduate, then it is bilingual. (3) If a candidate has a visa, then it is not bonded. (4) If a candidate is seasoned, then it is certified. (5) If a candidate is bilingual, then it is bonded. Question: Is it true that Mads is not bonded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013165", "pair_id": "u013165-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013165-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "0b39c374e2463837", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013165-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not a graduate. Mads is not seasoned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is eligible, it also has a visa. Clause 2: once any candidate is a graduate, it also is bilingual. Clause 3: once any candidate has a visa, it also is not bonded. Clause 4: once any candidate is not seasoned, it also is certified. Clause 5: once any candidate is bilingual, it also is bonded. Question: Does it follow that Mads is not bonded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013165", "pair_id": "u013165-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013165-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "02b82dafaf1300a8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013165-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not a graduate. Mads is not seasoned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is eligible, it also has a visa. Clause 2: once any candidate is a graduate, it also is bilingual. Clause 3: once any candidate has a visa, it also is not bonded. Clause 4: once any candidate is seasoned, it also is certified. Clause 5: once any candidate is bilingual, it also is bonded. Question: Does it follow that Mads is not bonded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013165", "pair_id": "u013165-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013165-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "0b39c374e2463837", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013166-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dagny is underwritten. Dagny is not garnished.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is not prequalified, then it has a guarantor. (2) If a borrower is not solvent, then it is refinanced. (3) If a borrower is garnished, then it is not overdrawn. (4) If a borrower is not underwritten, then it is overdrawn. (5) If a borrower is garnished, then it is indebted. (6) If a borrower is not garnished, then it is not prequalified. (7) If a borrower is garnished, then it is not solvent. (4) is void if the borrower is garnished. When (4) and (3) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Dagny?", "options": ["has a guarantor", "is refinanced"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a guarantor", "unit_id": "u013166", "pair_id": "u013166-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013166-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "36f223b7a5fef9b0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a1"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u013166-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dagny is not underwritten. Dagny is not garnished.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is not prequalified, then it has a guarantor. (2) If a borrower is not solvent, then it is refinanced. (3) If a borrower is garnished, then it is not overdrawn. (4) If a borrower is not underwritten, then it is overdrawn. (5) If a borrower is garnished, then it is indebted. (6) If a borrower is not garnished, then it is not prequalified. (7) If a borrower is garnished, then it is not solvent. (4) is void if the borrower is garnished. When (4) and (3) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Dagny?", "options": ["has a guarantor", "is refinanced"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a guarantor", "unit_id": "u013166", "pair_id": "u013166-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013166-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0caf9a69aacf83a8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a1"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u013166-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dagny is underwritten. Dagny is not garnished.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is not prequalified, it also has a guarantor. Clause 2: once any borrower is not solvent, it also is refinanced. Clause 3: once any borrower is garnished, it also is not overdrawn. Clause 4: once any borrower is not underwritten, it also is overdrawn. Clause 5: once any borrower is garnished, it also is indebted. Clause 6: once any borrower is not garnished, it also is not prequalified. Clause 7: once any borrower is garnished, it also is not solvent. Clause 4 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is garnished. Clause 4 overrides Clause 3. Question: Which of these is true of Dagny?", "options": ["has a guarantor", "is refinanced"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a guarantor", "unit_id": "u013166", "pair_id": "u013166-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013166-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "36f223b7a5fef9b0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a1"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u013166-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dagny is not underwritten. Dagny is not garnished.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is not prequalified, it also has a guarantor. Clause 2: once any borrower is not solvent, it also is refinanced. Clause 3: once any borrower is garnished, it also is not overdrawn. Clause 4: once any borrower is not underwritten, it also is overdrawn. Clause 5: once any borrower is garnished, it also is indebted. Clause 6: once any borrower is not garnished, it also is not prequalified. Clause 7: once any borrower is garnished, it also is not solvent. Clause 4 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is garnished. Clause 4 overrides Clause 3. Question: Which of these is true of Dagny?", "options": ["has a guarantor", "is refinanced"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a guarantor", "unit_id": "u013166", "pair_id": "u013166-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013166-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0caf9a69aacf83a8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a1"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u013188-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 65. Deneb has a citation index of 46. Fomalhaut is a pilot study. Capella has a citation index of 6. Deneb has a milestone total of 98. Fomalhaut has a milestone total of 55. Capella is resubmitted. Capella is not a pilot study.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a citation index of at least 21, then it is not interdisciplinary. (2) If a proposal is a pilot study, then it has no field site. (3) If a proposal has a milestone total above 58, then it has no patent filing. (4) If a proposal is a pilot study, then it is not peer reviewed. (5) If a proposal is not interdisciplinary, then it is not cofunded. (6) If a proposal has a citation index of at most 62, then it has a postdoc. (7) If a proposal is longitudinal, then it has a field site. (8) If a proposal is resubmitted, then it is peer reviewed. (9) If a proposal has a patent filing, then it is interdisciplinary. (10) If a proposal has a field site, then it is cofunded. (11) If a proposal has a milestone total of at least 43, then it is longitudinal. (12) If a proposal has a milestone total above 21, then it has no postdoc. (13) If a proposal has a milestone total of at most 70, then it has a patent filing. When (6) and (12) clash, (6) prevails. When (3) and (13) clash, (3) prevails. When (9) and (1) clash, (9) prevails. When (2) and (7) clash, (2) prevails. When (10) and (5) clash, (10) prevails. When (8) and (4) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Is it true that Fomalhaut is cofunded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013188", "pair_id": "u013188-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013188-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cd944a5806762298", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013188-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 65. Deneb has a citation index of 46. Fomalhaut is a pilot study. Capella has a citation index of 6. Deneb has a milestone total of 98. Fomalhaut has a milestone total of 55. Capella is resubmitted. Capella is not a pilot study.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a citation index of at least 21, then it is not interdisciplinary. (2) If a proposal is a pilot study, then it has no field site. (3) If a proposal has a milestone total above 58, then it has no patent filing. (4) If a proposal is a pilot study, then it is not peer reviewed. (5) If a proposal is interdisciplinary, then it is not cofunded. (6) If a proposal has a citation index of at most 62, then it has a postdoc. (7) If a proposal is longitudinal, then it has a field site. (8) If a proposal is resubmitted, then it is peer reviewed. (9) If a proposal has a patent filing, then it is interdisciplinary. (10) If a proposal has a field site, then it is cofunded. (11) If a proposal has a milestone total of at least 43, then it is longitudinal. (12) If a proposal has a milestone total above 21, then it has no postdoc. (13) If a proposal has a milestone total of at most 70, then it has a patent filing. When (6) and (12) clash, (6) prevails. When (3) and (13) clash, (3) prevails. When (9) and (1) clash, (9) prevails. When (2) and (7) clash, (2) prevails. When (10) and (5) clash, (10) prevails. When (8) and (4) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Is it true that Fomalhaut is cofunded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013188", "pair_id": "u013188-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013188-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8c18ebb7dbb05bff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013188-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 65. Deneb has a citation index of 46. Fomalhaut is a pilot study. Capella has a citation index of 6. Deneb has a milestone total of 98. Fomalhaut has a milestone total of 55. Capella is resubmitted. Capella is not a pilot study.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has a citation index of no less than 21, that proposal is not interdisciplinary. Item B. When the proposal is a pilot study, that proposal has no field site. Item C. When the proposal has a milestone total of more than 58, that proposal has no patent filing. Item D. When the proposal is a pilot study, that proposal is not peer reviewed. Item E. When the proposal is not interdisciplinary, that proposal is not cofunded. Item F. When the proposal has a citation index of no more than 62, that proposal has a postdoc. Item G. When the proposal is longitudinal, that proposal has a field site. Item H. When the proposal is resubmitted, that proposal is peer reviewed. Item I. When the proposal has a patent filing, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item J. When the proposal has a field site, that proposal is cofunded. Item K. When the proposal has a milestone total of no less than 43, that proposal is longitudinal. Item L. When the proposal has a milestone total of more than 21, that proposal has no postdoc. Item M. When the proposal has a milestone total of no more than 70, that proposal has a patent filing. Item F outranks Item L. Item C outranks Item M. Item I outranks Item A. Item B outranks Item G. Item J outranks Item E. Item H outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Fomalhaut is cofunded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013188", "pair_id": "u013188-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013188-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cd944a5806762298", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013188-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 65. Deneb has a citation index of 46. Fomalhaut is a pilot study. Capella has a citation index of 6. Deneb has a milestone total of 98. Fomalhaut has a milestone total of 55. Capella is resubmitted. Capella is not a pilot study.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has a citation index of no less than 21, that proposal is not interdisciplinary. Item B. When the proposal is a pilot study, that proposal has no field site. Item C. When the proposal has a milestone total of more than 58, that proposal has no patent filing. Item D. When the proposal is a pilot study, that proposal is not peer reviewed. Item E. When the proposal is interdisciplinary, that proposal is not cofunded. Item F. When the proposal has a citation index of no more than 62, that proposal has a postdoc. Item G. When the proposal is longitudinal, that proposal has a field site. Item H. When the proposal is resubmitted, that proposal is peer reviewed. Item I. When the proposal has a patent filing, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item J. When the proposal has a field site, that proposal is cofunded. Item K. When the proposal has a milestone total of no less than 43, that proposal is longitudinal. Item L. When the proposal has a milestone total of more than 21, that proposal has no postdoc. Item M. When the proposal has a milestone total of no more than 70, that proposal has a patent filing. Item F outranks Item L. Item C outranks Item M. Item I outranks Item A. Item B outranks Item G. Item J outranks Item E. Item H outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Fomalhaut is cofunded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013188", "pair_id": "u013188-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013188-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8c18ebb7dbb05bff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013207-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not patched. Sierra is throttled. Sierra has a dedicated host. Borealis is replicated. Borealis is not encrypted. Borealis has a GPU. Borealis is mirrored. Borealis is not patched. Sierra is provisioned. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra is not mirrored. Borealis has a dedicated host. Borealis is not sandboxed. Sierra has a GPU.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload has a failover node plus has a GPU: then it is deprecated. Policy II. Suppose that workload is patched plus is encrypted: then it is monitored. Policy III. Suppose that workload is sharded plus is mirrored plus is provisioned: then it is not containerized. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is not mirrored plus has a failover node: then it is autoscaled. Policy V. Suppose that workload has a dedicated host: then it is not monitored. Policy VI. Suppose that workload is autoscaled plus has a failover node: then it is sharded. Policy VII. Suppose that workload is sharded plus has a dedicated host: then it is containerized. Policy VIII. Suppose that workload is sharded plus is throttled plus is replicated: then it is not idle. Policy VIII is waived if that workload is mirrored. Policy I is waived if that workload has a dedicated host. Policy VII is waived if that workload is sandboxed plus has a dedicated host. Policy II is waived if that workload is encrypted. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy VII. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy II. Question: Is it so that Sierra is containerized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013207", "pair_id": "u013207-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013207-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "275dbf4131f2e83e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u013207-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not patched. Sierra is throttled. Sierra has a dedicated host. Borealis is replicated. Borealis is not encrypted. Borealis has a GPU. Borealis is mirrored. Borealis is not patched. Sierra is provisioned. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra is not mirrored. Borealis has a dedicated host. Borealis is not sandboxed. Sierra has a GPU.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload has a failover node plus has a GPU: then it is deprecated. Policy II. Suppose that workload is patched plus is encrypted: then it is monitored. Policy III. Suppose that workload is sharded plus is mirrored plus is provisioned: then it is not containerized. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is mirrored plus has a failover node: then it is autoscaled. Policy V. Suppose that workload has a dedicated host: then it is not monitored. Policy VI. Suppose that workload is autoscaled plus has a failover node: then it is sharded. Policy VII. Suppose that workload is sharded plus has a dedicated host: then it is containerized. Policy VIII. Suppose that workload is sharded plus is throttled plus is replicated: then it is not idle. Policy VIII is waived if that workload is mirrored. Policy I is waived if that workload has a dedicated host. Policy VII is waived if that workload is sandboxed plus has a dedicated host. Policy II is waived if that workload is encrypted. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy VII. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy II. Question: Is it so that Sierra is containerized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013207", "pair_id": "u013207-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013207-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a7776b8871ee73d9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u013235-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory has no barcode. Jory is labeled. Jory is oversized. Priya is not palletized. Priya is prepaid. Liesel is not sealed. Liesel is not perishable. Liesel is prepaid. Priya is not misrouted. Priya has no barcode. Priya is not sealed. Jory is perishable. Jory is consolidated. Jory is palletized. Priya is oversized. Priya is undeliverable. Liesel is palletized. Liesel is misrouted. Jory is not prepaid.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is perishable, then it is tracked. (2) If a parcel is delayed and is misrouted, then it is hazardous. (3) If a parcel is delayed and is consolidated and is undeliverable, then it is fragile. (4) If a parcel is delayed and is sealed and is tracked, then it is scanned. (5) If a parcel is sealed, then it has a waybill. (6) If a parcel is prepaid, then it has no courier. (7) If a parcel is labeled, then it is delayed. (8) If a parcel is sealed, then it has no waybill. (9) If a parcel has a barcode, then it has a courier. (10) If a parcel is delayed and has a barcode, then it is rerouted. (11) If a parcel is oversized, then it is not hazardous. (12) If a parcel is delayed and is palletized and is perishable, then it is stamped. (12) is void if the parcel is sealed. (2) is void if the parcel is palletized. (3) is void if the parcel has a barcode. When (6) and (9) clash, (6) prevails. When (5) and (8) clash, (5) prevails. When (11) and (2) clash, (11) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Jory?", "options": ["is rerouted", "is scanned", "is hazardous", "is fragile", "is stamped"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is stamped", "unit_id": "u013235", "pair_id": "u013235-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/16", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013235-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6fea9b52d96b6c61", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a3", "a12", "a11", "a16"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013235-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory has no barcode. Jory is labeled. Jory is oversized. Priya is not palletized. Priya is prepaid. Liesel is not sealed. Liesel is not perishable. Liesel is prepaid. Priya is not misrouted. Priya has no barcode. Priya is not sealed. Jory is perishable. Jory is consolidated. Jory is palletized. Priya is oversized. Priya is undeliverable. Jory is sealed. Liesel is palletized. Liesel is misrouted. Jory is not prepaid.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is perishable, then it is tracked. (2) If a parcel is delayed and is misrouted, then it is hazardous. (3) If a parcel is delayed and is consolidated and is undeliverable, then it is fragile. (4) If a parcel is delayed and is sealed and is tracked, then it is scanned. (5) If a parcel is sealed, then it has a waybill. (6) If a parcel is prepaid, then it has no courier. (7) If a parcel is labeled, then it is delayed. (8) If a parcel is sealed, then it has no waybill. (9) If a parcel has a barcode, then it has a courier. (10) If a parcel is delayed and has a barcode, then it is rerouted. (11) If a parcel is oversized, then it is not hazardous. (12) If a parcel is delayed and is palletized and is perishable, then it is stamped. (12) is void if the parcel is sealed. (2) is void if the parcel is palletized. (3) is void if the parcel has a barcode. When (6) and (9) clash, (6) prevails. When (5) and (8) clash, (5) prevails. When (11) and (2) clash, (11) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Jory?", "options": ["is rerouted", "is scanned", "is hazardous", "is fragile", "is stamped"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is scanned", "unit_id": "u013235", "pair_id": "u013235-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/16", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013235-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ae01d47ff925f2e0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a3", "a12", "a11", "a16"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013235-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory has no barcode. Jory is labeled. Jory is oversized. Priya is not palletized. Priya is prepaid. Liesel is not sealed. Liesel is not perishable. Liesel is prepaid. Priya is not misrouted. Priya has no barcode. Priya is not sealed. Jory is perishable. Jory is consolidated. Jory is palletized. Priya is oversized. Priya is undeliverable. Liesel is palletized. Liesel is misrouted. Jory is not prepaid.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is perishable, it also is tracked. Clause 2: once any parcel is delayed and also is misrouted, it also is hazardous. Clause 3: once any parcel is delayed and also is consolidated and also is undeliverable, it also is fragile. Clause 4: once any parcel is delayed and also is sealed and also is tracked, it also is scanned. Clause 5: once any parcel is sealed, it also has a waybill. Clause 6: once any parcel is prepaid, it also has no courier. Clause 7: once any parcel is labeled, it also is delayed. Clause 8: once any parcel is sealed, it also has no waybill. Clause 9: once any parcel has a barcode, it also has a courier. Clause 10: once any parcel is delayed and also has a barcode, it also is rerouted. Clause 11: once any parcel is oversized, it also is not hazardous. Clause 12: once any parcel is delayed and also is palletized and also is perishable, it also is stamped. Clause 12 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is sealed. Clause 2 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is palletized. Clause 3 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel has a barcode. Clause 6 overrides Clause 9. Clause 5 overrides Clause 8. Clause 11 overrides Clause 2. Question: Which of these is true of Jory?", "options": ["is rerouted", "is scanned", "is hazardous", "is fragile", "is stamped"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is stamped", "unit_id": "u013235", "pair_id": "u013235-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/16", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013235-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6fea9b52d96b6c61", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a3", "a12", "a11", "a16"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013235-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory has no barcode. Jory is labeled. Jory is oversized. Priya is not palletized. Priya is prepaid. Liesel is not sealed. Liesel is not perishable. Liesel is prepaid. Priya is not misrouted. Priya has no barcode. Priya is not sealed. Jory is perishable. Jory is consolidated. Jory is palletized. Priya is oversized. Priya is undeliverable. Jory is sealed. Liesel is palletized. Liesel is misrouted. Jory is not prepaid.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is perishable, it also is tracked. Clause 2: once any parcel is delayed and also is misrouted, it also is hazardous. Clause 3: once any parcel is delayed and also is consolidated and also is undeliverable, it also is fragile. Clause 4: once any parcel is delayed and also is sealed and also is tracked, it also is scanned. Clause 5: once any parcel is sealed, it also has a waybill. Clause 6: once any parcel is prepaid, it also has no courier. Clause 7: once any parcel is labeled, it also is delayed. Clause 8: once any parcel is sealed, it also has no waybill. Clause 9: once any parcel has a barcode, it also has a courier. Clause 10: once any parcel is delayed and also has a barcode, it also is rerouted. Clause 11: once any parcel is oversized, it also is not hazardous. Clause 12: once any parcel is delayed and also is palletized and also is perishable, it also is stamped. Clause 12 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is sealed. Clause 2 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is palletized. Clause 3 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel has a barcode. Clause 6 overrides Clause 9. Clause 5 overrides Clause 8. Clause 11 overrides Clause 2. Question: Which of these is true of Jory?", "options": ["is rerouted", "is scanned", "is hazardous", "is fragile", "is stamped"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is scanned", "unit_id": "u013235", "pair_id": "u013235-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/16", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013235-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ae01d47ff925f2e0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a3", "a12", "a11", "a16"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013260-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz has a lint backlog of 68. Gneiss is benchmarked. Gneiss is experimental. Obsidian is notarized. Zircon is notarized. Quartz is not notarized. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Gneiss is not notarized. Zircon is not experimental. Quartz is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is not notarized, thus it is not tagged. Provision 2: when the build here is not notarized, thus it is tagged. Provision 3: when the build here is experimental, thus it is versioned. Provision 4: when the build here has a lint backlog at or below 68, thus it is not linted. Provision 5: when the build here is tagged, thus it is not signed. Provision 2 has no effect when the build here is benchmarked. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here has a lint backlog at or below 68. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here has a lint backlog beneath 44. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here is not benchmarked. Question: Would it be right to say that Quartz is tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013260", "pair_id": "u013260-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013260-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0f55a1d882204551", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013260-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz has a lint backlog of 68. Gneiss is benchmarked. Gneiss is experimental. Obsidian is notarized. Zircon is notarized. Quartz is not notarized. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Gneiss is not notarized. Zircon is not experimental. Quartz is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is not notarized, thus it is not tagged. Provision 2: when the build here is not notarized, thus it is tagged. Provision 3: when the build here is experimental, thus it is versioned. Provision 4: when the build here has a lint backlog at or below 65, thus it is not linted. Provision 5: when the build here is tagged, thus it is not signed. Provision 2 has no effect when the build here is benchmarked. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here has a lint backlog at or below 68. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here has a lint backlog beneath 44. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here is not benchmarked. Question: Would it be right to say that Quartz is tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013260", "pair_id": "u013260-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013260-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0258e8d911af97bd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013260-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz has a lint backlog of 68. Gneiss is benchmarked. Gneiss is experimental. Obsidian is notarized. Zircon is notarized. Quartz is not notarized. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Gneiss is not notarized. Zircon is not experimental. Quartz is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is not notarized, it thereby is not tagged. Point B. If said build is not notarized, it thereby is tagged. Point C. If said build is experimental, it thereby is versioned. Point D. If said build has a lint backlog of maximum 68, it thereby is not linted. Point E. If said build is tagged, it thereby is not signed. Point B is cancelled if said build is benchmarked. Point A is cancelled if said build has a lint backlog of maximum 68. Point C is cancelled if said build has a lint backlog short of 44. Point A is cancelled if said build is not benchmarked. Question: Statement: Quartz is tagged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013260", "pair_id": "u013260-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013260-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0f55a1d882204551", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013260-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz has a lint backlog of 68. Gneiss is benchmarked. Gneiss is experimental. Obsidian is notarized. Zircon is notarized. Quartz is not notarized. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Gneiss is not notarized. Zircon is not experimental. Quartz is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is not notarized, it thereby is not tagged. Point B. If said build is not notarized, it thereby is tagged. Point C. If said build is experimental, it thereby is versioned. Point D. If said build has a lint backlog of maximum 65, it thereby is not linted. Point E. If said build is tagged, it thereby is not signed. Point B is cancelled if said build is benchmarked. Point A is cancelled if said build has a lint backlog of maximum 68. Point C is cancelled if said build has a lint backlog short of 44. Point A is cancelled if said build is not benchmarked. Question: Statement: Quartz is tagged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013260", "pair_id": "u013260-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013260-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0258e8d911af97bd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013260-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz has a lint backlog of 68. Gneiss is benchmarked. Gneiss is experimental. Obsidian is notarized. Zircon is notarized. Quartz is not notarized. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Gneiss is not notarized. Zircon is not experimental. Quartz is benchmarked.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is not notarized, so it is not tagged. No. 2 While the given build is not notarized, so it is tagged. No. 3 While the given build is experimental, so it is versioned. No. 4 While the given build has a lint backlog not above 68, so it is not linted. No. 5 While the given build is tagged, so it is not signed. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build is benchmarked. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build has a lint backlog not above 68. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given build has a lint backlog that falls below 44. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build is not benchmarked. Question: Is the claim \"Quartz is tagged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013260", "pair_id": "u013260-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013260-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0f55a1d882204551", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013260-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz has a lint backlog of 68. Gneiss is benchmarked. Gneiss is experimental. Obsidian is notarized. Zircon is notarized. Quartz is not notarized. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Gneiss is not notarized. Zircon is not experimental. Quartz is benchmarked.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is not notarized, so it is not tagged. No. 2 While the given build is not notarized, so it is tagged. No. 3 While the given build is experimental, so it is versioned. No. 4 While the given build has a lint backlog not above 65, so it is not linted. No. 5 While the given build is tagged, so it is not signed. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build is benchmarked. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build has a lint backlog not above 68. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given build has a lint backlog that falls below 44. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build is not benchmarked. Question: Is the claim \"Quartz is tagged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013260", "pair_id": "u013260-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013260-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0258e8d911af97bd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013266-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rune is a veteran. Rune is bonded. Rune has a mentor. Rune has no background screening. Rune has a diploma. Rune is bilingual.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has a mentor, thus it is a graduate. Provision 2: when the candidate here is bonded, thus it is not unionized. Provision 3: when the candidate here is a graduate while is unionized while is a veteran, thus it is seasoned. Provision 4: when the candidate here is a graduate while is bilingual while is bonded, thus it is recommended. Provision 5: when the candidate here is unionized, thus it is not recommended. Provision 6: when the candidate here is eligible, thus it is unionized. Provision 7: when the candidate here has a diploma while is eligible, thus it is interviewed. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Rune?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is recommended"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is recommended", "unit_id": "u013266", "pair_id": "u013266-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013266-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5805d23e24a9c3f1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013266-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rune is eligible. Rune is a veteran. Rune is bonded. Rune has a mentor. Rune has no background screening. Rune has a diploma. Rune is bilingual.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has a mentor, thus it is a graduate. Provision 2: when the candidate here is bonded, thus it is not unionized. Provision 3: when the candidate here is a graduate while is unionized while is a veteran, thus it is seasoned. Provision 4: when the candidate here is a graduate while is bilingual while is bonded, thus it is recommended. Provision 5: when the candidate here is unionized, thus it is not recommended. Provision 6: when the candidate here is eligible, thus it is unionized. Provision 7: when the candidate here has a diploma while is eligible, thus it is interviewed. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Rune?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is recommended"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is seasoned", "unit_id": "u013266", "pair_id": "u013266-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013266-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bd89aafab868d5e6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013266-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rune is a veteran. Rune is bonded. Rune has a mentor. Rune has no background screening. Rune has a diploma. Rune is bilingual.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a mentor, it thereby is a graduate. Point B. If said candidate is bonded, it thereby is not unionized. Point C. If said candidate is a graduate and further is unionized and further is a veteran, it thereby is seasoned. Point D. If said candidate is a graduate and further is bilingual and further is bonded, it thereby is recommended. Point E. If said candidate is unionized, it thereby is not recommended. Point F. If said candidate is eligible, it thereby is unionized. Point G. If said candidate has a diploma and further is eligible, it thereby is interviewed. Point F supersedes Point B. Point E supersedes Point D. Question: Which choice is true for Rune?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is recommended"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is recommended", "unit_id": "u013266", "pair_id": "u013266-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013266-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5805d23e24a9c3f1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013266-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rune is eligible. Rune is a veteran. Rune is bonded. Rune has a mentor. Rune has no background screening. Rune has a diploma. Rune is bilingual.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a mentor, it thereby is a graduate. Point B. If said candidate is bonded, it thereby is not unionized. Point C. If said candidate is a graduate and further is unionized and further is a veteran, it thereby is seasoned. Point D. If said candidate is a graduate and further is bilingual and further is bonded, it thereby is recommended. Point E. If said candidate is unionized, it thereby is not recommended. Point F. If said candidate is eligible, it thereby is unionized. Point G. If said candidate has a diploma and further is eligible, it thereby is interviewed. Point F supersedes Point B. Point E supersedes Point D. Question: Which choice is true for Rune?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is recommended"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is seasoned", "unit_id": "u013266", "pair_id": "u013266-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013266-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bd89aafab868d5e6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013266-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rune is a veteran. Rune is bonded. Rune has a mentor. Rune has no background screening. Rune has a diploma. Rune is bilingual.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a mentor, so it is a graduate. No. 2 While the given candidate is bonded, so it is not unionized. No. 3 While the given candidate is a graduate and likewise is unionized and likewise is a veteran, so it is seasoned. No. 4 While the given candidate is a graduate and likewise is bilingual and likewise is bonded, so it is recommended. No. 5 While the given candidate is unionized, so it is not recommended. No. 6 While the given candidate is eligible, so it is unionized. No. 7 While the given candidate has a diploma and likewise is eligible, so it is interviewed. No. 6 wins over No. 2. No. 5 wins over No. 4. Question: Select what holds for Rune: which option?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is recommended"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is recommended", "unit_id": "u013266", "pair_id": "u013266-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013266-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5805d23e24a9c3f1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013266-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rune is eligible. Rune is a veteran. Rune is bonded. Rune has a mentor. Rune has no background screening. Rune has a diploma. Rune is bilingual.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a mentor, so it is a graduate. No. 2 While the given candidate is bonded, so it is not unionized. No. 3 While the given candidate is a graduate and likewise is unionized and likewise is a veteran, so it is seasoned. No. 4 While the given candidate is a graduate and likewise is bilingual and likewise is bonded, so it is recommended. No. 5 While the given candidate is unionized, so it is not recommended. No. 6 While the given candidate is eligible, so it is unionized. No. 7 While the given candidate has a diploma and likewise is eligible, so it is interviewed. No. 6 wins over No. 2. No. 5 wins over No. 4. Question: Select what holds for Rune: which option?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is recommended"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is seasoned", "unit_id": "u013266", "pair_id": "u013266-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013266-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bd89aafab868d5e6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013285-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda has an adjuster. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Wanda is not grandfathered. Wanda is covered. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Fabian is not covered.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has a deductible waiver: then it is reimbursed. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it is lapsed. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is appraised: then it is retired. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has no adjuster: then it is litigated. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster: then it is uninsurable. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is grandfathered: then it is reinstated. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder has no deductible waiver: then it has a beneficiary. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder is not disputed: then it has a dashcam. Policy IX. Suppose that policyholder is not covered: then it is bundled. Policy X. Suppose that policyholder is not appraised: then it has flood coverage. Policy VIII is waived if that policyholder is grandfathered. Policy IX is waived if that policyholder is indemnified. Question: Which choice is right for Wanda?", "options": ["is litigated", "is retired", "has flood coverage", "is lapsed", "is uninsurable", "is reinstated", "has a dashcam", "is bundled"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is uninsurable", "unit_id": "u013285", "pair_id": "u013285-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013285-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d75018ceaea4a949", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a15", "a2", "a6", "a16", "a5", "a0", "a8"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013285-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda has no adjuster. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Wanda is not grandfathered. Wanda is covered. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Fabian is not covered.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has a deductible waiver: then it is reimbursed. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it is lapsed. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is appraised: then it is retired. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has no adjuster: then it is litigated. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster: then it is uninsurable. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is grandfathered: then it is reinstated. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder has no deductible waiver: then it has a beneficiary. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder is not disputed: then it has a dashcam. Policy IX. Suppose that policyholder is not covered: then it is bundled. Policy X. Suppose that policyholder is not appraised: then it has flood coverage. Policy VIII is waived if that policyholder is grandfathered. Policy IX is waived if that policyholder is indemnified. Question: Which choice is right for Wanda?", "options": ["is litigated", "is retired", "has flood coverage", "is lapsed", "is uninsurable", "is reinstated", "has a dashcam", "is bundled"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is litigated", "unit_id": "u013285", "pair_id": "u013285-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013285-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8a0a6e6a2ecece52", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a15", "a2", "a6", "a16", "a5", "a0", "a8"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013285-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda has an adjuster. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Wanda is not grandfathered. Wanda is covered. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Fabian is not covered.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has a deductible waiver, it then is reimbursed. #2 Each time a policyholder is indemnified, it then is lapsed. #3 Each time a policyholder is appraised, it then is retired. #4 Each time a policyholder has no adjuster, it then is litigated. #5 Each time a policyholder has an adjuster, it then is uninsurable. #6 Each time a policyholder is grandfathered, it then is reinstated. #7 Each time a policyholder has no deductible waiver, it then has a beneficiary. #8 Each time a policyholder is not disputed, it then has a dashcam. #9 Each time a policyholder is not covered, it then is bundled. #10 Each time a policyholder is not appraised, it then has flood coverage. #8 is set aside if a policyholder is grandfathered. #9 is set aside if a policyholder is indemnified. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Wanda?", "options": ["is litigated", "is retired", "has flood coverage", "is lapsed", "is uninsurable", "is reinstated", "has a dashcam", "is bundled"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is uninsurable", "unit_id": "u013285", "pair_id": "u013285-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013285-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d75018ceaea4a949", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a15", "a2", "a6", "a16", "a5", "a0", "a8"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013285-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda has no adjuster. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Wanda is not grandfathered. Wanda is covered. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Fabian is not covered.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has a deductible waiver, it then is reimbursed. #2 Each time a policyholder is indemnified, it then is lapsed. #3 Each time a policyholder is appraised, it then is retired. #4 Each time a policyholder has no adjuster, it then is litigated. #5 Each time a policyholder has an adjuster, it then is uninsurable. #6 Each time a policyholder is grandfathered, it then is reinstated. #7 Each time a policyholder has no deductible waiver, it then has a beneficiary. #8 Each time a policyholder is not disputed, it then has a dashcam. #9 Each time a policyholder is not covered, it then is bundled. #10 Each time a policyholder is not appraised, it then has flood coverage. #8 is set aside if a policyholder is grandfathered. #9 is set aside if a policyholder is indemnified. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Wanda?", "options": ["is litigated", "is retired", "has flood coverage", "is lapsed", "is uninsurable", "is reinstated", "has a dashcam", "is bundled"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is litigated", "unit_id": "u013285", "pair_id": "u013285-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013285-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8a0a6e6a2ecece52", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a15", "a2", "a6", "a16", "a5", "a0", "a8"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013286-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste has a peril factor of 1. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 46. Edda has a payout ceiling of 87. Celeste has a beneficiary. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 59. Wanda has a beneficiary. Edda has a peril factor of 16. Yara has a peril factor of 51.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is reimbursed provided that it has a payout ceiling lower than 84 as well as has a peril factor of 16 or higher. Section 2: a policyholder is not reimbursed provided that it has a payout ceiling lower than 84 as well as has a peril factor lower than 16. Section 3: a policyholder is subrogated provided that it has a beneficiary. Section 4: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it has a claim frequency lower than 68 as well as has a beneficiary. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it has a payout ceiling of 35 or lower. Question: Celeste is reimbursed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013286", "pair_id": "u013286-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013286-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e51bc313e323aa50", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013286-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste has a peril factor of 1. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 46. Edda has a payout ceiling of 87. Celeste has a beneficiary. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 59. Wanda has a beneficiary. Edda has a peril factor of 43. Yara has a peril factor of 51.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is reimbursed provided that it has a payout ceiling lower than 84 as well as has a peril factor of 16 or higher. Section 2: a policyholder is not reimbursed provided that it has a payout ceiling lower than 84 as well as has a peril factor lower than 16. Section 3: a policyholder is subrogated provided that it has a beneficiary. Section 4: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it has a claim frequency lower than 68 as well as has a beneficiary. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it has a payout ceiling of 35 or lower. Question: Celeste is reimbursed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013286", "pair_id": "u013286-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013286-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d4ed334284d7a7f2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013286-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste has a peril factor of 1. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 46. Edda has a payout ceiling of 87. Celeste has a beneficiary. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 59. Wanda has a beneficiary. Edda has a peril factor of 16. Yara has a peril factor of 51.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling less than 84 and additionally has a peril factor of 16 or above, it then is reimbursed. #2 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling less than 84 and additionally has a peril factor less than 16, it then is not reimbursed. #3 Each time a policyholder has a beneficiary, it then is subrogated. #4 Each time a policyholder has a claim frequency less than 68 and additionally has a beneficiary, it then has flood coverage. #2 is set aside if a policyholder has a payout ceiling of 35 or below. Question: Do the terms above show that Celeste is reimbursed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013286", "pair_id": "u013286-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013286-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e51bc313e323aa50", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013286-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste has a peril factor of 1. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 46. Edda has a payout ceiling of 87. Celeste has a beneficiary. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 59. Wanda has a beneficiary. Edda has a peril factor of 43. Yara has a peril factor of 51.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling less than 84 and additionally has a peril factor of 16 or above, it then is reimbursed. #2 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling less than 84 and additionally has a peril factor less than 16, it then is not reimbursed. #3 Each time a policyholder has a beneficiary, it then is subrogated. #4 Each time a policyholder has a claim frequency less than 68 and additionally has a beneficiary, it then has flood coverage. #2 is set aside if a policyholder has a payout ceiling of 35 or below. Question: Do the terms above show that Celeste is reimbursed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013286", "pair_id": "u013286-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013286-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d4ed334284d7a7f2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013287-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not contagious. Zora is symptomatic. Zora is postoperative.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is diabetic, then it is not admitted. (2) If a patient is contagious, then it is bedridden. (3) If a patient is anemic, then it is vaccinated. (4) If a patient is discharged, then it is asthmatic. (5) If a patient is rescheduled, then it is not anemic. (6) If a patient is not contagious, then it has no caregiver. (7) If a patient is symptomatic, then it has a caregiver. (8) If a patient is vaccinated, then it is admitted. (9) If a patient is allergic, then it is anemic. (10) If a patient is bedridden, then it is diabetic. (11) If a patient is postoperative, then it is not vaccinated. (12) If a patient is asthmatic, then it is not diabetic. When (11) and (3) clash, (11) prevails. When (10) and (12) clash, (10) prevails. When (6) and (7) clash, (6) prevails. When (9) and (5) clash, (9) prevails. When (8) and (1) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Is it true that Zora is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013287", "pair_id": "u013287-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013287-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0e35e2c19557c4f3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013287-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not contagious. Zora is symptomatic. Zora is postoperative.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is diabetic, then it is not admitted. (2) If a patient is contagious, then it is bedridden. (3) If a patient is anemic, then it is vaccinated. (4) If a patient is discharged, then it is asthmatic. (5) If a patient is rescheduled, then it is not anemic. (6) If a patient is contagious, then it has no caregiver. (7) If a patient is symptomatic, then it has a caregiver. (8) If a patient is vaccinated, then it is admitted. (9) If a patient is allergic, then it is anemic. (10) If a patient is bedridden, then it is diabetic. (11) If a patient is postoperative, then it is not vaccinated. (12) If a patient is asthmatic, then it is not diabetic. When (11) and (3) clash, (11) prevails. When (10) and (12) clash, (10) prevails. When (6) and (7) clash, (6) prevails. When (9) and (5) clash, (9) prevails. When (8) and (1) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Is it true that Zora is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013287", "pair_id": "u013287-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013287-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "9b869022a696248e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013287-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not contagious. Zora is symptomatic. Zora is postoperative.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is diabetic, it also is not admitted. Clause 2: once any patient is contagious, it also is bedridden. Clause 3: once any patient is anemic, it also is vaccinated. Clause 4: once any patient is discharged, it also is asthmatic. Clause 5: once any patient is rescheduled, it also is not anemic. Clause 6: once any patient is not contagious, it also has no caregiver. Clause 7: once any patient is symptomatic, it also has a caregiver. Clause 8: once any patient is vaccinated, it also is admitted. Clause 9: once any patient is allergic, it also is anemic. Clause 10: once any patient is bedridden, it also is diabetic. Clause 11: once any patient is postoperative, it also is not vaccinated. Clause 12: once any patient is asthmatic, it also is not diabetic. Clause 11 overrides Clause 3. Clause 10 overrides Clause 12. Clause 6 overrides Clause 7. Clause 9 overrides Clause 5. Clause 8 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Zora is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013287", "pair_id": "u013287-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013287-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0e35e2c19557c4f3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013287-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not contagious. Zora is symptomatic. Zora is postoperative.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is diabetic, it also is not admitted. Clause 2: once any patient is contagious, it also is bedridden. Clause 3: once any patient is anemic, it also is vaccinated. Clause 4: once any patient is discharged, it also is asthmatic. Clause 5: once any patient is rescheduled, it also is not anemic. Clause 6: once any patient is contagious, it also has no caregiver. Clause 7: once any patient is symptomatic, it also has a caregiver. Clause 8: once any patient is vaccinated, it also is admitted. Clause 9: once any patient is allergic, it also is anemic. Clause 10: once any patient is bedridden, it also is diabetic. Clause 11: once any patient is postoperative, it also is not vaccinated. Clause 12: once any patient is asthmatic, it also is not diabetic. Clause 11 overrides Clause 3. Clause 10 overrides Clause 12. Clause 6 overrides Clause 7. Clause 9 overrides Clause 5. Clause 8 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Zora is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013287", "pair_id": "u013287-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013287-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "9b869022a696248e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013309-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not lapsed. Agata is not litigated. Agata has flood coverage. Viggo has no flood coverage. Viggo is lapsed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is reinstated, it also is a smoker. Clause 2: once any policyholder is litigated, it also is not a smoker. Clause 3: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also is subrogated. Clause 4: once any policyholder is reinstated, it also is grandfathered. Clause 5: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is not uninsurable. Clause 6: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is not bundled. Clause 7: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is bundled. Clause 2 overrides Clause 1. Clause 6 overrides Clause 7. Question: Does it follow that Agata is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013309", "pair_id": "u013309-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013309-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "e54cbe3d8670bc8a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013309-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not lapsed. Agata is reinstated. Agata is not litigated. Agata has flood coverage. Viggo has no flood coverage. Viggo is lapsed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is reinstated, it also is a smoker. Clause 2: once any policyholder is litigated, it also is not a smoker. Clause 3: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also is subrogated. Clause 4: once any policyholder is reinstated, it also is grandfathered. Clause 5: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is not uninsurable. Clause 6: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is not bundled. Clause 7: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is bundled. Clause 2 overrides Clause 1. Clause 6 overrides Clause 7. Question: Does it follow that Agata is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013309", "pair_id": "u013309-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013309-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "1bdc11133d5bb260", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013309-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not lapsed. Agata is not litigated. Agata has flood coverage. Viggo has no flood coverage. Viggo is lapsed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is reinstated, that policyholder is a smoker. Item B. When the policyholder is litigated, that policyholder is not a smoker. Item C. When the policyholder has flood coverage, that policyholder is subrogated. Item D. When the policyholder is reinstated, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item E. When the policyholder is lapsed, that policyholder is not uninsurable. Item F. When the policyholder is a smoker, that policyholder is not bundled. Item G. When the policyholder is subrogated, that policyholder is bundled. Item B outranks Item A. Item F outranks Item G. Question: Can one infer that Agata is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013309", "pair_id": "u013309-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013309-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "e54cbe3d8670bc8a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013309-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not lapsed. Agata is reinstated. Agata is not litigated. Agata has flood coverage. Viggo has no flood coverage. Viggo is lapsed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is reinstated, that policyholder is a smoker. Item B. When the policyholder is litigated, that policyholder is not a smoker. Item C. When the policyholder has flood coverage, that policyholder is subrogated. Item D. When the policyholder is reinstated, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item E. When the policyholder is lapsed, that policyholder is not uninsurable. Item F. When the policyholder is a smoker, that policyholder is not bundled. Item G. When the policyholder is subrogated, that policyholder is bundled. Item B outranks Item A. Item F outranks Item G. Question: Can one infer that Agata is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013309", "pair_id": "u013309-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013309-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "1bdc11133d5bb260", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013316-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has a risk tier of 21. Tomas is not garnished. Tomas has a risk tier of 88. Bastien is not creditworthy. Corin has a risk tier of 16. Bastien is refinanced.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has no collateral, it also has no cosigner. Clause 2: once any borrower has no collateral, it also is not underwritten. Clause 3: once any borrower is garnished, it also has an escrow account. Clause 4: once any borrower is not refinanced, it also has a cosigner. Clause 5: once any borrower has a cosigner, it also has a mortgage. Clause 6: once any borrower has a risk tier over 55, it also is underwritten. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 1 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Bastien has a cosigner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013316", "pair_id": "u013316-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013316-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1f52e41b5e6852c3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013316-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has a risk tier of 21. Tomas is not garnished. Tomas has a risk tier of 88. Bastien is not creditworthy. Corin has a risk tier of 16. Bastien is refinanced.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has no collateral, it also has no cosigner. Clause 2: once any borrower has no collateral, it also is not underwritten. Clause 3: once any borrower is garnished, it also has an escrow account. Clause 4: once any borrower is refinanced, it also has a cosigner. Clause 5: once any borrower has a cosigner, it also has a mortgage. Clause 6: once any borrower has a risk tier over 55, it also is underwritten. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 1 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Bastien has a cosigner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013316", "pair_id": "u013316-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013316-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e4e25578535047b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013342-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has a review mark of 36. Capella has seed funding. Capella is endorsed. Gemma has seed funding.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has a review mark of 88 or above, it then has a steering committee. #2 Each time a proposal is preregistered, it then is interdisciplinary. #3 Each time a proposal has a steering committee, it then is preregistered. #4 Each time a proposal is not shortlisted, it then is not interdisciplinary. #5 Each time a proposal has a review mark of 71 or above, it then is resubmitted. #6 Each time a proposal has seed funding, it then is a pilot study. #7 Each time a proposal is not a pilot study, it then is not shortlisted. #8 Each time a proposal is not endorsed, it then is translational. Question: Do the terms above show that Capella is interdisciplinary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013342", "pair_id": "u013342-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013342-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "f981fc7439ca7fb1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013342-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has a review mark of 36. Capella has seed funding. Capella is endorsed. Gemma has seed funding.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has a review mark of 88 or above, it then has a steering committee. #2 Each time a proposal is preregistered, it then is interdisciplinary. #3 Each time a proposal has a steering committee, it then is preregistered. #4 Each time a proposal is not shortlisted, it then is not interdisciplinary. #5 Each time a proposal has a review mark of 71 or above, it then is resubmitted. #6 Each time a proposal has seed funding, it then is a pilot study. #7 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then is not shortlisted. #8 Each time a proposal is not endorsed, it then is translational. Question: Do the terms above show that Capella is interdisciplinary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013342", "pair_id": "u013342-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013342-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5d1634155836b5f4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013352-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is a smoker. Zdenek is uninsurable. Zdenek has a beneficiary. Wanda has no beneficiary. Zdenek has no roadside assistance. Zdenek is subrogated. Zdenek is reimbursed. Zdenek is a claimant. Wanda is uninsurable. Wanda is not reimbursed. Zdenek is not a smoker.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is reinstated while has a beneficiary while is reimbursed, thus it is bundled. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary while is a smoker while is not a claimant, thus it is not grandfathered. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is inspected while is uninsurable, thus it is reinstated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is subrogated while has no rider while has roadside assistance, thus it is not reinstated. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is reinstated while has no beneficiary, thus it is not bundled. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has no dashcam, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is inspected. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is a claimant while is subrogated, thus it is not inspected. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Would it be right to say that Zdenek is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013352", "pair_id": "u013352-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/11", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013352-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0a210a6c50b9a852", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013352-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is a smoker. Zdenek is uninsurable. Zdenek has a beneficiary. Wanda has no beneficiary. Zdenek has no roadside assistance. Zdenek is subrogated. Zdenek is reimbursed. Zdenek is a claimant. Wanda is uninsurable. Wanda is not reimbursed. Zdenek is not a smoker. Zdenek has no dashcam.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is reinstated while has a beneficiary while is reimbursed, thus it is bundled. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary while is a smoker while is not a claimant, thus it is not grandfathered. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is inspected while is uninsurable, thus it is reinstated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is subrogated while has no rider while has roadside assistance, thus it is not reinstated. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is reinstated while has no beneficiary, thus it is not bundled. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has no dashcam, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is inspected. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is a claimant while is subrogated, thus it is not inspected. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Would it be right to say that Zdenek is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013352", "pair_id": "u013352-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/11", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013352-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d814a797d2352ff4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013352-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is a smoker. Zdenek is uninsurable. Zdenek has a beneficiary. Wanda has no beneficiary. Zdenek has no roadside assistance. Zdenek is subrogated. Zdenek is reimbursed. Zdenek is a claimant. Wanda is uninsurable. Wanda is not reimbursed. Zdenek is not a smoker.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is reinstated and further has a beneficiary and further is reimbursed, it thereby is bundled. Point B. If said policyholder has a beneficiary and further is a smoker and further is not a claimant, it thereby is not grandfathered. Point C. If said policyholder is inspected and further is uninsurable, it thereby is reinstated. Point D. If said policyholder is subrogated and further has no rider and further has roadside assistance, it thereby is not reinstated. Point E. If said policyholder is reinstated and further has no beneficiary, it thereby is not bundled. Point F. If said policyholder has no dashcam, it thereby has a premium discount. Point G. If said policyholder is a claimant, it thereby is inspected. Point H. If said policyholder is a claimant and further is subrogated, it thereby is not inspected. Point C supersedes Point D. Point A supersedes Point E. Point G supersedes Point H. Question: Statement: Zdenek is bundled. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013352", "pair_id": "u013352-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/11", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013352-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0a210a6c50b9a852", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013352-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is a smoker. Zdenek is uninsurable. Zdenek has a beneficiary. Wanda has no beneficiary. Zdenek has no roadside assistance. Zdenek is subrogated. Zdenek is reimbursed. Zdenek is a claimant. Wanda is uninsurable. Wanda is not reimbursed. Zdenek is not a smoker. Zdenek has no dashcam.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is reinstated and further has a beneficiary and further is reimbursed, it thereby is bundled. Point B. If said policyholder has a beneficiary and further is a smoker and further is not a claimant, it thereby is not grandfathered. Point C. If said policyholder is inspected and further is uninsurable, it thereby is reinstated. Point D. If said policyholder is subrogated and further has no rider and further has roadside assistance, it thereby is not reinstated. Point E. If said policyholder is reinstated and further has no beneficiary, it thereby is not bundled. Point F. If said policyholder has no dashcam, it thereby has a premium discount. Point G. If said policyholder is a claimant, it thereby is inspected. Point H. If said policyholder is a claimant and further is subrogated, it thereby is not inspected. Point C supersedes Point D. Point A supersedes Point E. Point G supersedes Point H. Question: Statement: Zdenek is bundled. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013352", "pair_id": "u013352-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/11", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013352-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d814a797d2352ff4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013365-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gneiss is profiled. Talc has a defect tally of 95. Gneiss has a test yield of 75.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is compiled, it also is merged. Clause 2: once any build has a test yield over 71, it also is tested. Clause 3: once any build is experimental, it also is compiled. Clause 4: once any build has a security advisory, it also is versioned. Clause 5: once any build has a defect tally over 61, it also is notarized. Clause 6: once any build is versioned, it also has a changelog. Clause 7: once any build is flaky, it also has a migration script. Clause 8: once any build has a test yield over 74, it also has a security advisory. Clause 9: once any build is notarized, it also is flaky. Clause 10: once any build is profiled, it also is benchmarked. Clause 11: once any build has a test yield of 74 or less, it also is experimental. Question: Which of these is true of Gneiss?", "options": ["has a migration script", "is merged", "has a changelog"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a changelog", "unit_id": "u013365", "pair_id": "u013365-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013365-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "0175cac0bfc81e0a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a7", "a12"]}, "attempt": 22}}
{"id": "syn-u013365-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gneiss is profiled. Talc has a defect tally of 95. Gneiss has a test yield of 14.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is compiled, it also is merged. Clause 2: once any build has a test yield over 71, it also is tested. Clause 3: once any build is experimental, it also is compiled. Clause 4: once any build has a security advisory, it also is versioned. Clause 5: once any build has a defect tally over 61, it also is notarized. Clause 6: once any build is versioned, it also has a changelog. Clause 7: once any build is flaky, it also has a migration script. Clause 8: once any build has a test yield over 74, it also has a security advisory. Clause 9: once any build is notarized, it also is flaky. Clause 10: once any build is profiled, it also is benchmarked. Clause 11: once any build has a test yield of 74 or less, it also is experimental. Question: Which of these is true of Gneiss?", "options": ["has a migration script", "is merged", "has a changelog"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is merged", "unit_id": "u013365", "pair_id": "u013365-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013365-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "063b3c39b39ab308", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a7", "a12"]}, "attempt": 22}}
{"id": "syn-u013369-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has a postal zone of 37. Mirela is not labeled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is scanned, it also has a locker slot. Clause 2: once any parcel is scanned, it also is stamped. Clause 3: once any parcel is labeled, it also is perishable. Clause 4: once any parcel has a locker slot, it also is weighed. Clause 5: once any parcel has a postal zone under 10, it also is not stamped. Clause 6: once any parcel is not stamped, it also is not weighed. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Clause 4 overrides Clause 6. Question: Does it follow that Mirela is weighed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013369", "pair_id": "u013369-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013369-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "60b91cb3564ad46a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013369-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has a postal zone of 37. Mirela is not labeled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is scanned, it also has a locker slot. Clause 2: once any parcel is scanned, it also is stamped. Clause 3: once any parcel is not labeled, it also is perishable. Clause 4: once any parcel has a locker slot, it also is weighed. Clause 5: once any parcel has a postal zone under 10, it also is not stamped. Clause 6: once any parcel is not stamped, it also is not weighed. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Clause 4 overrides Clause 6. Question: Does it follow that Mirela is weighed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013369", "pair_id": "u013369-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013369-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "450c6bcef8b770ad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013372-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas has a cosigner. Tomas is not audited. Tomas has no guarantor.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has no cosigner, it then is creditworthy. #2 Each time a borrower is not foreclosed, it then is indebted. #3 Each time a borrower is not audited, it then is overdrawn. Question: Do the terms above show that Tomas is indebted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013372", "pair_id": "u013372-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013372-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "eb37778bfcfa78b4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013372-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas has a cosigner. Tomas is not audited. Tomas has no guarantor.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has no cosigner, it then is creditworthy. #2 Each time a borrower is not foreclosed, it then is indebted. #3 Each time a borrower is not audited, it then is overdrawn. #4 Each time a borrower has no guarantor, it then is not indebted. Question: Do the terms above show that Tomas is indebted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013372", "pair_id": "u013372-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013372-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "6e892064e28e875f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013393-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist is tagged. Schist has no migration script. Schist has a lint backlog of 72. Schist has a patch cycle of 78.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is not reverted. Provision 2: when the build here is tagged, thus it is localized. Provision 3: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it is linted. Provision 4: when the build here has a lint backlog at or below 71, thus it is notarized. Provision 5: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is not localized. Provision 6: when the build here has a patch cycle beyond 21, thus it is not experimental. Provision 7: when the build here is reverted, thus it is minified. Provision 8: when the build here is notarized, thus it has a feature toggle. Provision 9: when the build here is documented, thus it is reverted. Provision 10: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is not notarized. Provision 11: when the build here has a lint backlog at or above 85, thus it is experimental. Provision 12: when the build here has a lint backlog beyond 71, thus it is documented. Provision 11 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 10. Question: Which one describes Schist?", "options": ["is linted", "is minified"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u013393", "pair_id": "u013393-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013393-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2ea8dc497108ef2f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a6"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u013393-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist is tagged. Schist has no migration script. Schist has a lint backlog of 14. Schist has a patch cycle of 78.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is not reverted. Provision 2: when the build here is tagged, thus it is localized. Provision 3: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it is linted. Provision 4: when the build here has a lint backlog at or below 71, thus it is notarized. Provision 5: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is not localized. Provision 6: when the build here has a patch cycle beyond 21, thus it is not experimental. Provision 7: when the build here is reverted, thus it is minified. Provision 8: when the build here is notarized, thus it has a feature toggle. Provision 9: when the build here is documented, thus it is reverted. Provision 10: when the build here has a migration script, thus it is not notarized. Provision 11: when the build here has a lint backlog at or above 85, thus it is experimental. Provision 12: when the build here has a lint backlog beyond 71, thus it is documented. Provision 11 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 10. Question: Which one describes Schist?", "options": ["is linted", "is minified"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is linted", "unit_id": "u013393", "pair_id": "u013393-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013393-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "78a39bbe7ab9d9b6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a6"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u013399-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirela is delayed. Nandor is stamped. Mirela has a postal zone of 35. Mirela is not oversized. Mirela has a parcel volume of 81. Mirela is fragile. Nandor is not delayed. Mirela is stamped. Nandor is fragile. Nandor has a postal zone of 48. Nandor is oversized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is oversized while is delayed, thus it is not scanned. Provision 2: when the parcel here is delayed while has a weight class beyond 30, thus it is sealed. Provision 3: when the parcel here is delayed while has a parcel volume beyond 55 while is stamped, thus it is palletized. Provision 4: when the parcel here is fragile while is delayed, thus it is scanned. Provision 5: when the parcel here is delayed while has a weight class at or below 30 while has a postal zone beneath 38, thus it is hazardous. Provision 6: when the parcel here is delayed while has a parcel volume at or below 55 while is stamped, thus it is misrouted. Provision 5 has no effect when the parcel here has a postal zone beyond 18. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Mirela?", "options": ["is sealed", "is palletized", "is misrouted", "is hazardous"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is palletized", "unit_id": "u013399", "pair_id": "u013399-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013399-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f9976882502c57e5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a11", "a6", "a5"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u013399-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirela is delayed. Nandor is stamped. Mirela has a postal zone of 35. Mirela is not oversized. Mirela has a parcel volume of 51. Mirela is fragile. Nandor is not delayed. Mirela is stamped. Nandor is fragile. Nandor has a postal zone of 48. Nandor is oversized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is oversized while is delayed, thus it is not scanned. Provision 2: when the parcel here is delayed while has a weight class beyond 30, thus it is sealed. Provision 3: when the parcel here is delayed while has a parcel volume beyond 55 while is stamped, thus it is palletized. Provision 4: when the parcel here is fragile while is delayed, thus it is scanned. Provision 5: when the parcel here is delayed while has a weight class at or below 30 while has a postal zone beneath 38, thus it is hazardous. Provision 6: when the parcel here is delayed while has a parcel volume at or below 55 while is stamped, thus it is misrouted. Provision 5 has no effect when the parcel here has a postal zone beyond 18. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Mirela?", "options": ["is sealed", "is palletized", "is misrouted", "is hazardous"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is misrouted", "unit_id": "u013399", "pair_id": "u013399-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013399-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f8604a713a1deaa2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a11", "a6", "a5"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u013414-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is not headhunted. Olek has a commute radius of 5. Olek is unionized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is not freelance, it then has a diploma. #2 Each time a candidate is freelance, it then is not seasoned. #3 Each time a candidate is headhunted, it then is bilingual. #4 Each time a candidate has a commute radius of 26 or below, it then is seasoned. Question: Do the terms above show that Olek is not seasoned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013414", "pair_id": "u013414-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013414-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "82c6a17c122baa1f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013414-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is not headhunted. Olek has a commute radius of 5. Olek is unionized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is not freelance, it then has a diploma. #2 Each time a candidate is freelance, it then is not seasoned. #3 Each time a candidate is headhunted, it then is bilingual. #4 Each time a candidate has a commute radius greater than 26, it then is seasoned. Question: Do the terms above show that Olek is not seasoned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013414", "pair_id": "u013414-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013414-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "376438c1758019fa", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013481-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is longitudinal. Mirach is not longitudinal. Kochab is not longitudinal. Mirach is not multicenter. Betelgeuse is cofunded. Kochab is not multicenter. Kochab is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse is multicenter. Izar is not a pilot study. Izar is not collaborative. Izar is not cofunded. Izar is not multicenter. Kochab is collaborative. Mirach is not a pilot study.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is not renewed, that proposal has industry backing. Item B. When the proposal is not collaborative, that proposal has no postdoc. Item C. When the proposal is budgeted, and is not longitudinal, that proposal has no industry backing. Item D. When the proposal is multicenter, and is theoretical, that proposal is budgeted. Item E. When the proposal is not theoretical, that proposal has a postdoc. Item F. When the proposal is longitudinal, that proposal is not renewed. Item G. When the proposal has industry backing, and is not a pilot study, that proposal is not resubmitted. Item H. When the proposal has industry backing, and is a pilot study, and is cofunded, that proposal is resubmitted. Item A outranks Item C. Item H outranks Item G. Item B outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Kochab is not resubmitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013481", "pair_id": "u013481-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013481-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8b096b13e64eb81e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 35}}
{"id": "syn-u013481-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is longitudinal. Mirach is not longitudinal. Kochab is not longitudinal. Mirach is not multicenter. Betelgeuse is cofunded. Kochab is not multicenter. Kochab is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse is multicenter. Izar is not a pilot study. Izar is not collaborative. Izar is not cofunded. Izar is not multicenter. Kochab is not collaborative. Mirach is not a pilot study.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is not renewed, that proposal has industry backing. Item B. When the proposal is not collaborative, that proposal has no postdoc. Item C. When the proposal is budgeted, and is not longitudinal, that proposal has no industry backing. Item D. When the proposal is multicenter, and is theoretical, that proposal is budgeted. Item E. When the proposal is not theoretical, that proposal has a postdoc. Item F. When the proposal is longitudinal, that proposal is not renewed. Item G. When the proposal has industry backing, and is not a pilot study, that proposal is not resubmitted. Item H. When the proposal has industry backing, and is a pilot study, and is cofunded, that proposal is resubmitted. Item A outranks Item C. Item H outranks Item G. Item B outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Kochab is not resubmitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013481", "pair_id": "u013481-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013481-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "11a29674f2598c19", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 35}}
{"id": "syn-u013517-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile is not palletized. Odile is not fragile. Liesel is palletized. Liesel is labeled. Liesel is hazardous. Odile is consolidated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is fragile and further is weighed, it thereby is registered. Point B. If said parcel has a courier and further is rerouted and further is hazardous, it thereby is damaged. Point C. If said parcel is prepaid and further is consolidated and further is weighed, it thereby has a courier. Point D. If said parcel is palletized, it thereby is prepaid. Point E. If said parcel is prepaid and further is labeled, it thereby has no courier. Point F. If said parcel has no courier, it thereby is delayed. Question: Statement: Liesel has a courier. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013517", "pair_id": "u013517-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013517-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "a41d2ecfc56d94cc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u013517-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile is not palletized. Odile is not fragile. Liesel is palletized. Liesel is labeled. Liesel is hazardous. Odile is consolidated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is fragile and further is weighed, it thereby is registered. Point B. If said parcel has a courier and further is rerouted and further is hazardous, it thereby is damaged. Point C. If said parcel is prepaid and further is consolidated and further is weighed, it thereby has a courier. Point D. If said parcel is palletized, it thereby is prepaid. Point E. If said parcel is prepaid and further is labeled, it thereby has no courier. Point F. If said parcel has a courier, it thereby is delayed. Question: Statement: Liesel has a courier. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013517", "pair_id": "u013517-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013517-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "ea4924f5d82579c7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u013517-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile is not palletized. Odile is not fragile. Liesel is palletized. Liesel is labeled. Liesel is hazardous. Odile is consolidated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is fragile and likewise is weighed, so it is registered. No. 2 While the given parcel has a courier and likewise is rerouted and likewise is hazardous, so it is damaged. No. 3 While the given parcel is prepaid and likewise is consolidated and likewise is weighed, so it has a courier. No. 4 While the given parcel is palletized, so it is prepaid. No. 5 While the given parcel is prepaid and likewise is labeled, so it has no courier. No. 6 While the given parcel has no courier, so it is delayed. Question: Is the claim \"Liesel has a courier\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013517", "pair_id": "u013517-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013517-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "a41d2ecfc56d94cc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u013517-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile is not palletized. Odile is not fragile. Liesel is palletized. Liesel is labeled. Liesel is hazardous. Odile is consolidated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is fragile and likewise is weighed, so it is registered. No. 2 While the given parcel has a courier and likewise is rerouted and likewise is hazardous, so it is damaged. No. 3 While the given parcel is prepaid and likewise is consolidated and likewise is weighed, so it has a courier. No. 4 While the given parcel is palletized, so it is prepaid. No. 5 While the given parcel is prepaid and likewise is labeled, so it has no courier. No. 6 While the given parcel has a courier, so it is delayed. Question: Is the claim \"Liesel has a courier\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013517", "pair_id": "u013517-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013517-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "ea4924f5d82579c7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u013524-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is not hazardous. Quentin is not rerouted. Quentin is refrigerated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel has a barcode provided that it has a delivery window of 35 or lower. Section 2: a parcel is tracked provided that it is not refrigerated. Section 3: a parcel has a waybill provided that it is tracked. Section 4: a parcel is sealed provided that it is rerouted. Section 5: a parcel is labeled provided that it is misrouted. Section 6: a parcel is prepaid provided that it is labeled. Section 7: a parcel is misrouted provided that it is hazardous. Section 8: a parcel is not prepaid provided that it has a waybill. Question: Quentin is prepaid. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013524", "pair_id": "u013524-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013524-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "c8b21e1043870617", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013524-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is not hazardous. Quentin is not rerouted. Quentin is refrigerated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel has a barcode provided that it has a delivery window of 35 or lower. Section 2: a parcel is tracked provided that it is refrigerated. Section 3: a parcel has a waybill provided that it is tracked. Section 4: a parcel is sealed provided that it is rerouted. Section 5: a parcel is labeled provided that it is misrouted. Section 6: a parcel is prepaid provided that it is labeled. Section 7: a parcel is misrouted provided that it is hazardous. Section 8: a parcel is not prepaid provided that it has a waybill. Question: Quentin is prepaid. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013524", "pair_id": "u013524-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013524-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "01306ff0f40561d9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013524-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is not hazardous. Quentin is not rerouted. Quentin is refrigerated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window no higher than 35: then it has a barcode. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is not refrigerated: then it is tracked. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it has a waybill. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is rerouted: then it is sealed. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it is labeled. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is labeled: then it is prepaid. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is hazardous: then it is misrouted. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel has a waybill: then it is not prepaid. Question: Is it so that Quentin is prepaid?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013524", "pair_id": "u013524-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013524-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "c8b21e1043870617", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013524-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is not hazardous. Quentin is not rerouted. Quentin is refrigerated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window no higher than 35: then it has a barcode. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated: then it is tracked. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it has a waybill. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is rerouted: then it is sealed. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it is labeled. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is labeled: then it is prepaid. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is hazardous: then it is misrouted. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel has a waybill: then it is not prepaid. Question: Is it so that Quentin is prepaid?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013524", "pair_id": "u013524-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013524-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "01306ff0f40561d9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013525-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not allergic. Yusuf is not allergic. Yusuf is ambulatory. Zora is not referred. Yusuf has a caregiver. Yusuf has an interpreter. Yusuf has no pacemaker. Gunnar is not referred. Zora is not ambulatory. Zora is not allergic. Yusuf is referred. Benedek is not allergic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is allergic and further has an interpreter and further is ambulatory, it thereby has a chaperone. Point B. If said patient has a pacemaker and further is ambulatory, it thereby is triaged. Point C. If said patient has no pacemaker and further is referred and further has a caregiver, it thereby is not triaged. Question: Statement: Yusuf is triaged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013525", "pair_id": "u013525-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013525-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "43ca32f1eb53e96d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u013525-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not allergic. Yusuf is not allergic. Yusuf is ambulatory. Zora is not referred. Yusuf has a caregiver. Yusuf has an interpreter. Yusuf has no pacemaker. Gunnar is not referred. Zora is not ambulatory. Zora is not allergic. Yusuf is referred. Benedek is not allergic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is allergic and further has an interpreter and further is ambulatory, it thereby has a chaperone. Point B. If said patient has a pacemaker and further is ambulatory, it thereby is triaged. Point C. If said patient has a pacemaker and further is referred and further has a caregiver, it thereby is not triaged. Question: Statement: Yusuf is triaged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013525", "pair_id": "u013525-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013525-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "9fa6d6f6a3a2357e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u013530-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is not overdrawn. Wiebke is not refinanced. Ilse is a homeowner. Ilse is overdrawn. Ingrid has a mortgage. Bastien is not refinanced. Ilse is vetted. Ilse has no escrow account. Wiebke is not a homeowner. Ingrid is a homeowner. Ingrid is not refinanced. Ilse has a mortgage. Wiebke has no mortgage. Ilse is refinanced.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is refinanced and has a mortgage and is not a homeowner, then it is not indebted. (2) If a borrower is vetted and is not overdrawn, then it is audited. (3) If a borrower is not a homeowner and has an escrow account, then it is underwritten. (4) If a borrower is refinanced and has no mortgage and is overdrawn, then it is indebted. (5) If a borrower is indebted, then it is creditworthy. Question: Is it true that Ilse is indebted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013530", "pair_id": "u013530-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013530-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "9b5444c5d5255b59", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013530-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is not overdrawn. Wiebke is not refinanced. Ilse is a homeowner. Ilse is overdrawn. Ingrid has a mortgage. Bastien is not refinanced. Ilse is vetted. Ilse has no escrow account. Wiebke is not a homeowner. Ingrid is a homeowner. Ingrid is not refinanced. Ilse has a mortgage. Wiebke has no mortgage. Ilse is refinanced.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is refinanced and has a mortgage and is a homeowner, then it is not indebted. (2) If a borrower is vetted and is not overdrawn, then it is audited. (3) If a borrower is not a homeowner and has an escrow account, then it is underwritten. (4) If a borrower is refinanced and has no mortgage and is overdrawn, then it is indebted. (5) If a borrower is indebted, then it is creditworthy. Question: Is it true that Ilse is indebted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013530", "pair_id": "u013530-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013530-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "6604cd0c93a2b284", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013556-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is monitored. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra is not backed up. Sierra is not throttled.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is autoscaled, it then is not sandboxed. #2 Each time a workload is autoscaled, it then is sandboxed. #3 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is isolated. #4 Each time a workload is monitored, it then is autoscaled. #1 is set aside if a workload is throttled. #2 is set aside if a workload has a failover node. #1 is set aside if a workload is backed up. #1 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Sierra is sandboxed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013556", "pair_id": "u013556-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013556-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a8d266fc516c26a3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u013556-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra has a GPU. Sierra is monitored. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra is not backed up. Sierra is not throttled.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is autoscaled, it then is not sandboxed. #2 Each time a workload is autoscaled, it then is sandboxed. #3 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is isolated. #4 Each time a workload is monitored, it then is autoscaled. #1 is set aside if a workload is throttled. #2 is set aside if a workload has a failover node. #1 is set aside if a workload is backed up. #1 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Sierra is sandboxed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013556", "pair_id": "u013556-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013556-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "507ac5f83ecce3f8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u013564-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is not freelance. Rune is seasoned. Rune is freelance. Rune is not onboarded. Ivo is onboarded. Teodor has an aptitude quotient of 32. Teodor is seasoned. Ivo is not freelance. Ivo has an aptitude quotient of 9. Rune has a signing bonus. Rune has a notice period of 53. Teodor has a notice period of 14. Teodor is a graduate. Ivo has a signing bonus. Ivo has a notice period of 62. Teodor is not freelance. Noor has an aptitude quotient of 80.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is bilingual provided that it is seasoned as well as has an aptitude quotient lower than 26 as well as has a notice period of 66 or higher. Section 2: a candidate is bonded provided that it is freelance as well as has a signing bonus as well as is not onboarded. Section 3: a candidate is not headhunted provided that it is not onboarded. Question: Ivo is a graduate. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013564", "pair_id": "u013564-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013564-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "eef40480eba3b2e5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013564-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not a graduate. Noor is not freelance. Rune is seasoned. Rune is freelance. Rune is not onboarded. Ivo is onboarded. Teodor has an aptitude quotient of 32. Teodor is seasoned. Ivo is not freelance. Ivo has an aptitude quotient of 9. Rune has a signing bonus. Rune has a notice period of 53. Teodor has a notice period of 14. Teodor is a graduate. Ivo has a signing bonus. Ivo has a notice period of 62. Teodor is not freelance. Noor has an aptitude quotient of 80.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is bilingual provided that it is seasoned as well as has an aptitude quotient lower than 26 as well as has a notice period of 66 or higher. Section 2: a candidate is bonded provided that it is freelance as well as has a signing bonus as well as is not onboarded. Section 3: a candidate is not headhunted provided that it is not onboarded. Question: Ivo is a graduate. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013564", "pair_id": "u013564-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013564-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "30d8e0ff6d46e471", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013577-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra has a notice period of 68. Petra has a signing bonus. Petra has an aptitude quotient of 26. Petra has a portfolio. Petra is relocating. Petra is not headhunted. Petra is certified. Petra is not unionized. Petra is probationary.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is bilingual and is probationary, then it is licensed. (2) If a candidate has an aptitude quotient of at most 30 and is certified, then it is not onboarded. (3) If a candidate is licensed and is relocating and is seasoned, then it is eligible. (4) If a candidate has a signing bonus, then it is bilingual. (5) If a candidate is probationary, then it is interviewed. (6) If a candidate is unionized, then it is not interviewed. (7) If a candidate is licensed and has a notice period of at least 76 and is relocating, then it has a mentor. (8) If a candidate is headhunted and is certified, then it is seasoned. (9) If a candidate is licensed and has a notice period below 76 and has a portfolio, then it is freelance. When (6) and (5) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Petra?", "options": ["has a mentor", "is eligible", "is freelance"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is freelance", "unit_id": "u013577", "pair_id": "u013577-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013577-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "339b37d5b825e9b0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013577-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra has a notice period of 79. Petra has a signing bonus. Petra has an aptitude quotient of 26. Petra has a portfolio. Petra is relocating. Petra is not headhunted. Petra is certified. Petra is not unionized. Petra is probationary.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is bilingual and is probationary, then it is licensed. (2) If a candidate has an aptitude quotient of at most 30 and is certified, then it is not onboarded. (3) If a candidate is licensed and is relocating and is seasoned, then it is eligible. (4) If a candidate has a signing bonus, then it is bilingual. (5) If a candidate is probationary, then it is interviewed. (6) If a candidate is unionized, then it is not interviewed. (7) If a candidate is licensed and has a notice period of at least 76 and is relocating, then it has a mentor. (8) If a candidate is headhunted and is certified, then it is seasoned. (9) If a candidate is licensed and has a notice period below 76 and has a portfolio, then it is freelance. When (6) and (5) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Petra?", "options": ["has a mentor", "is eligible", "is freelance"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a mentor", "unit_id": "u013577", "pair_id": "u013577-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013577-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "82f6b3d242f67842", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013617-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has no mortgage. Ilse is creditworthy. Wiebke has a mortgage. Ingrid is vetted. Ingrid is not employed. Ilse has no mortgage. Bastien is not creditworthy. Ilse is not indebted. Ingrid is not creditworthy. Wiebke is not garnished. Bastien is vetted. Bastien is a depositor. Ingrid is indebted.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is vetted and is employed and has a mortgage, then it is not audited. (2) If a borrower is employed and is not a depositor and is not indebted, then it has a lien. (3) If a borrower is not creditworthy and has a mortgage and is vetted, then it is not prequalified. (4) If a borrower is not creditworthy and has no mortgage and is garnished, then it is prequalified. When (4) and (3) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Bastien is prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013617", "pair_id": "u013617-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/2/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013617-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "70728142da2cac0a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013617-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has no mortgage. Ilse is creditworthy. Wiebke has a mortgage. Ingrid is vetted. Ingrid is not employed. Ilse has no mortgage. Bastien is not creditworthy. Ilse is not indebted. Ingrid is not creditworthy. Wiebke is not garnished. Bastien is vetted. Bastien is a depositor. Ingrid is indebted.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is vetted and is employed and has a mortgage, then it is not audited. (2) If a borrower is employed and is not a depositor and is indebted, then it has a lien. (3) If a borrower is not creditworthy and has a mortgage and is vetted, then it is not prequalified. (4) If a borrower is not creditworthy and has no mortgage and is garnished, then it is prequalified. When (4) and (3) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Bastien is prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013617", "pair_id": "u013617-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/2/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013617-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ce79cd242d85007e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013617-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has no mortgage. Ilse is creditworthy. Wiebke has a mortgage. Ingrid is vetted. Ingrid is not employed. Ilse has no mortgage. Bastien is not creditworthy. Ilse is not indebted. Ingrid is not creditworthy. Wiebke is not garnished. Bastien is vetted. Bastien is a depositor. Ingrid is indebted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is vetted and also is employed and also has a mortgage, it also is not audited. Clause 2: once any borrower is employed and also is not a depositor and also is not indebted, it also has a lien. Clause 3: once any borrower is not creditworthy and also has a mortgage and also is vetted, it also is not prequalified. Clause 4: once any borrower is not creditworthy and also has no mortgage and also is garnished, it also is prequalified. Clause 4 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Bastien is prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013617", "pair_id": "u013617-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/2/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013617-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "70728142da2cac0a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013617-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has no mortgage. Ilse is creditworthy. Wiebke has a mortgage. Ingrid is vetted. Ingrid is not employed. Ilse has no mortgage. Bastien is not creditworthy. Ilse is not indebted. Ingrid is not creditworthy. Wiebke is not garnished. Bastien is vetted. Bastien is a depositor. Ingrid is indebted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is vetted and also is employed and also has a mortgage, it also is not audited. Clause 2: once any borrower is employed and also is not a depositor and also is indebted, it also has a lien. Clause 3: once any borrower is not creditworthy and also has a mortgage and also is vetted, it also is not prequalified. Clause 4: once any borrower is not creditworthy and also has no mortgage and also is garnished, it also is prequalified. Clause 4 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Bastien is prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013617", "pair_id": "u013617-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/2/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013617-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ce79cd242d85007e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013637-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is not relocating. Mads has a seniority step of 11. Mads is relocating. Petra is recommended. Petra has a seniority step of 66. Petra is not freelance. Mads is not unionized. Petra is not licensed. Mads is freelance. Mads is licensed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is interviewed provided that it is not eligible. Section 2: a candidate is not interviewed provided that it is bonded. Section 3: a candidate has no background screening provided that it is unionized. Section 4: a candidate is not eligible provided that it is not sponsored. Section 5: a candidate is probationary provided that it is not licensed. Section 6: a candidate is not sponsored provided that it has a seniority step of 35 or higher. Section 7: a candidate has no diploma provided that it is relocating. Section 8: a candidate is bonded provided that it has no diploma. Section 9: a candidate is bilingual provided that it is freelance. Question: Petra is interviewed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013637", "pair_id": "u013637-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013637-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1b498750b7d4c582", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013637-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is not relocating. Mads has a seniority step of 11. Mads is relocating. Petra is recommended. Petra has a seniority step of 66. Petra is not freelance. Mads is not unionized. Petra is not licensed. Mads is freelance. Petra is unionized. Mads is licensed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is interviewed provided that it is not eligible. Section 2: a candidate is not interviewed provided that it is bonded. Section 3: a candidate has no background screening provided that it is unionized. Section 4: a candidate is not eligible provided that it is not sponsored. Section 5: a candidate is probationary provided that it is not licensed. Section 6: a candidate is not sponsored provided that it has a seniority step of 35 or higher. Section 7: a candidate has no diploma provided that it is relocating. Section 8: a candidate is bonded provided that it has no diploma. Section 9: a candidate is bilingual provided that it is freelance. Question: Petra is interviewed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013637", "pair_id": "u013637-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013637-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "b636e7a690cb094d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013652-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is sponsored. Rune is not unionized. Noor is not sponsored. Petra is not unionized. Petra has a background screening. Noor has a background screening. Teodor is unionized. Noor is interviewed. Rune has no background screening. Petra is not interviewed. Teodor is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not freelance provided that it is not sponsored as well as is not unionized. Section 2: a candidate is probationary provided that it is not unionized as well as is interviewed. Section 3: a candidate is licensed provided that it has no background screening. Section 4: a candidate is freelance provided that it is not sponsored as well as is unionized. Question: Noor is not freelance. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013652", "pair_id": "u013652-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013652-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "b8ea281128180976", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013652-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is sponsored. Noor is unionized. Rune is not unionized. Noor is not sponsored. Petra is not unionized. Petra has a background screening. Noor has a background screening. Teodor is unionized. Noor is interviewed. Rune has no background screening. Petra is not interviewed. Teodor is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not freelance provided that it is not sponsored as well as is not unionized. Section 2: a candidate is probationary provided that it is not unionized as well as is interviewed. Section 3: a candidate is licensed provided that it has no background screening. Section 4: a candidate is freelance provided that it is not sponsored as well as is unionized. Question: Noor is not freelance. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013652", "pair_id": "u013652-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013652-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "00b14b714e83aefd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013652-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is sponsored. Rune is not unionized. Noor is not sponsored. Petra is not unionized. Petra has a background screening. Noor has a background screening. Teodor is unionized. Noor is interviewed. Rune has no background screening. Petra is not interviewed. Teodor is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is not sponsored plus is not unionized: then it is not freelance. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is not unionized plus is interviewed: then it is probationary. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has no background screening: then it is licensed. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is not sponsored plus is unionized: then it is freelance. Question: Is it so that Noor is not freelance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013652", "pair_id": "u013652-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013652-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "b8ea281128180976", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013652-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is sponsored. Noor is unionized. Rune is not unionized. Noor is not sponsored. Petra is not unionized. Petra has a background screening. Noor has a background screening. Teodor is unionized. Noor is interviewed. Rune has no background screening. Petra is not interviewed. Teodor is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is not sponsored plus is not unionized: then it is not freelance. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is not unionized plus is interviewed: then it is probationary. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has no background screening: then it is licensed. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is not sponsored plus is unionized: then it is freelance. Question: Is it so that Noor is not freelance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013652", "pair_id": "u013652-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013652-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "00b14b714e83aefd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013676-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira has industry backing. Fomalhaut is resubmitted. Fomalhaut has ethics clearance. Nashira is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut has no field site. Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Nashira has no seed funding. Fomalhaut has industry backing. Nashira has a field site. Nashira has ethics clearance. Nashira has a steering committee. Fomalhaut has a steering committee.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is interdisciplinary and has a field site, then it is peer reviewed. (2) If a proposal has ethics clearance and has no seed funding, then it is theoretical. (3) If a proposal has ethics clearance and has a steering committee, then it has a postdoc. (4) If a proposal has a postdoc and has ethics clearance and is resubmitted, then it is cofunded. (5) If a proposal has a postdoc and has a field site, then it is not cofunded. (5) is void if the proposal is multicenter. (5) is void if the proposal is resubmitted and has industry backing. Question: Is it true that Nashira is cofunded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013676", "pair_id": "u013676-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013676-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4441c0a8a279efd5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013676-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira has industry backing. Fomalhaut is resubmitted. Fomalhaut has ethics clearance. Nashira is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut has no field site. Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Nashira has no seed funding. Fomalhaut has industry backing. Nashira has a field site. Nashira has ethics clearance. Nashira has a steering committee. Fomalhaut has a steering committee.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is interdisciplinary and has a field site, then it is peer reviewed. (2) If a proposal has ethics clearance and has seed funding, then it is theoretical. (3) If a proposal has ethics clearance and has a steering committee, then it has a postdoc. (4) If a proposal has a postdoc and has ethics clearance and is resubmitted, then it is cofunded. (5) If a proposal has a postdoc and has a field site, then it is not cofunded. (5) is void if the proposal is multicenter. (5) is void if the proposal is resubmitted and has industry backing. Question: Is it true that Nashira is cofunded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013676", "pair_id": "u013676-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013676-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f3a07bd252e67c84", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013676-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira has industry backing. Fomalhaut is resubmitted. Fomalhaut has ethics clearance. Nashira is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut has no field site. Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Nashira has no seed funding. Fomalhaut has industry backing. Nashira has a field site. Nashira has ethics clearance. Nashira has a steering committee. Fomalhaut has a steering committee.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is interdisciplinary, and has a field site, that proposal is peer reviewed. Item B. When the proposal has ethics clearance, and has no seed funding, that proposal is theoretical. Item C. When the proposal has ethics clearance, and has a steering committee, that proposal has a postdoc. Item D. When the proposal has a postdoc, and has ethics clearance, and is resubmitted, that proposal is cofunded. Item E. When the proposal has a postdoc, and has a field site, that proposal is not cofunded. Item E is suspended when the proposal is multicenter. Item E is suspended when the proposal is resubmitted, and has industry backing. Question: Can one infer that Nashira is cofunded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013676", "pair_id": "u013676-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013676-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4441c0a8a279efd5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013676-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira has industry backing. Fomalhaut is resubmitted. Fomalhaut has ethics clearance. Nashira is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut has no field site. Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Nashira has no seed funding. Fomalhaut has industry backing. Nashira has a field site. Nashira has ethics clearance. Nashira has a steering committee. Fomalhaut has a steering committee.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is interdisciplinary, and has a field site, that proposal is peer reviewed. Item B. When the proposal has ethics clearance, and has seed funding, that proposal is theoretical. Item C. When the proposal has ethics clearance, and has a steering committee, that proposal has a postdoc. Item D. When the proposal has a postdoc, and has ethics clearance, and is resubmitted, that proposal is cofunded. Item E. When the proposal has a postdoc, and has a field site, that proposal is not cofunded. Item E is suspended when the proposal is multicenter. Item E is suspended when the proposal is resubmitted, and has industry backing. Question: Can one infer that Nashira is cofunded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013676", "pair_id": "u013676-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013676-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f3a07bd252e67c84", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013715-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif has a fever reading of 88. Florin is vaccinated. Zora has a pulse rate of 85. Florin is pregnant. Florin has a pulse rate of 91. Xenia has a caregiver. Florin is not sedated. Florin is admitted. Elif has a caregiver. Xenia is pregnant. Zora has a caregiver. Zora has a mobility rank of 90. Xenia has a pain level of 73. Florin has a fever reading of 89. Elif is not pregnant. Elif is not sedated. Florin has a mobility rank of 97. Elif has a pain level of 47. Elif is vaccinated. Xenia has a fever reading of 52.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has a fever reading short of 25 and further is admitted, it thereby is not asthmatic. Point B. If said patient is asthmatic and further has a fever reading short of 90 and further is vaccinated, it thereby is not hypertensive. Point C. If said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 51, it thereby has a pacemaker. Point D. If said patient is asthmatic and further has a fever reading of minimum 75 and further is pregnant, it thereby is hypertensive. Point E. If said patient is sedated and further has a pulse rate of maximum 89, it thereby has a chaperone. Point F. If said patient has a caregiver and further has a pain level of maximum 44 and further has a mobility rank short of 38, it thereby has no pacemaker. Point G. If said patient has a pacemaker and further has a mobility rank in excess of 30, it thereby is asthmatic. Point F is cancelled if said patient has a fever reading of maximum 84. Point G supersedes Point A. Point B supersedes Point D. Point F supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Florin is hypertensive. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013715", "pair_id": "u013715-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013715-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0eeaef4b0d97b491", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013715-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif has a fever reading of 88. Florin is vaccinated. Zora has a pulse rate of 85. Florin is pregnant. Florin has a pulse rate of 91. Xenia has a caregiver. Florin is not sedated. Florin is admitted. Elif has a caregiver. Xenia is pregnant. Zora has a caregiver. Zora has a mobility rank of 90. Xenia has a pain level of 73. Florin has a fever reading of 89. Elif is not pregnant. Elif is not sedated. Florin has a mobility rank of 97. Elif has a pain level of 47. Elif is vaccinated. Xenia has a fever reading of 52.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has a fever reading short of 25 and further is admitted, it thereby is not asthmatic. Point B. If said patient is asthmatic and further has a fever reading short of 75 and further is vaccinated, it thereby is not hypertensive. Point C. If said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 51, it thereby has a pacemaker. Point D. If said patient is asthmatic and further has a fever reading of minimum 75 and further is pregnant, it thereby is hypertensive. Point E. If said patient is sedated and further has a pulse rate of maximum 89, it thereby has a chaperone. Point F. If said patient has a caregiver and further has a pain level of maximum 44 and further has a mobility rank short of 38, it thereby has no pacemaker. Point G. If said patient has a pacemaker and further has a mobility rank in excess of 30, it thereby is asthmatic. Point F is cancelled if said patient has a fever reading of maximum 84. Point G supersedes Point A. Point B supersedes Point D. Point F supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Florin is hypertensive. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013715", "pair_id": "u013715-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013715-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "16d64001fd7b3efc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013769-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is sponsored. Olek has a diploma. Olek is headhunted. Olek is not fingerprinted. Noor is sponsored. Noor is not a graduate. Noor has no background screening. Noor is fingerprinted. Noor has a mentor. Noor has a portfolio. Noor is headhunted. Rune has no mentor. Noor has a diploma.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is licensed plus has a background screening plus is a graduate: then it is seasoned. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it has a visa. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a portfolio plus is a graduate plus has a diploma: then it is not freelance. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is licensed plus is fingerprinted plus is sponsored: then it is not seasoned. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has a visa plus is headhunted: then it is licensed. Policy IV is waived if that candidate is headhunted plus has a background screening. Question: Is it so that Noor is seasoned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013769", "pair_id": "u013769-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013769-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cf07343a46f6f389", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u013769-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is sponsored. Olek has a diploma. Olek is headhunted. Olek is not fingerprinted. Noor is sponsored. Noor is not a graduate. Noor has no background screening. Noor is fingerprinted. Noor has a mentor. Noor has a portfolio. Noor is headhunted. Rune has no mentor. Noor has a diploma.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is licensed plus has a background screening plus is a graduate: then it is seasoned. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it has a visa. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a portfolio plus is a graduate plus has a diploma: then it is not freelance. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has a mentor: then it is bonded. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is licensed plus is fingerprinted plus is sponsored: then it is not seasoned. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate has a visa plus is headhunted: then it is licensed. Policy V is waived if that candidate is headhunted plus has a background screening. Question: Is it so that Noor is seasoned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013769", "pair_id": "u013769-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013769-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "284adc28ba5cd4e2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u013775-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is misrouted. Odile has a parcel volume of 94. Kaveh has a weight class of 9. Kaveh is not tracked. Kaveh is not hazardous. Odile is not perishable. Kaveh has a parcel volume of 65. Odile is not scanned. Kaveh has a delivery window of 83. Odile is hazardous. Odile has a weight class of 95. Odile is tracked. Odile has a postal zone of 36.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here has a barcode, thus it is stamped. Provision 2: when the parcel here is stamped while has a postal zone beneath 37, thus it is palletized. Provision 3: when the parcel here is weighed while is tracked, thus it is not delayed. Provision 4: when the parcel here is hazardous, thus it has a barcode. Provision 5: when the parcel here has a parcel volume beyond 86 while is weighed, thus it is consolidated. Provision 6: when the parcel here is stamped while has a postal zone at or above 37 while has a delivery window beneath 54, thus it is not palletized. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is hazardous. Provision 6 has no effect when the parcel here has a weight class at or below 53 while is scanned. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is misrouted while is scanned. Question: Would it be right to say that Odile is palletized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013775", "pair_id": "u013775-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013775-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "314810ad6c6fafbc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u013775-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is misrouted. Odile has a parcel volume of 94. Kaveh has a weight class of 9. Kaveh is not tracked. Kaveh is not hazardous. Odile is not perishable. Kaveh has a parcel volume of 65. Odile is not scanned. Kaveh has a delivery window of 83. Odile is hazardous. Odile has a weight class of 95. Odile is tracked. Odile has a postal zone of 45.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here has a barcode, thus it is stamped. Provision 2: when the parcel here is stamped while has a postal zone beneath 37, thus it is palletized. Provision 3: when the parcel here is weighed while is tracked, thus it is not delayed. Provision 4: when the parcel here is hazardous, thus it has a barcode. Provision 5: when the parcel here has a parcel volume beyond 86 while is weighed, thus it is consolidated. Provision 6: when the parcel here is stamped while has a postal zone at or above 37 while has a delivery window beneath 54, thus it is not palletized. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is hazardous. Provision 6 has no effect when the parcel here has a weight class at or below 53 while is scanned. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is misrouted while is scanned. Question: Would it be right to say that Odile is palletized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013775", "pair_id": "u013775-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013775-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9a01f7092ce1f23c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u013800-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar has a fever reading of 60. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 62. Aurel has a fever reading of 81. Aurel has a pulse rate of 96. Aurel is rescheduled. Gunnar is not rescheduled.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here has a pulse rate beneath 87, thus it is not asthmatic. Provision 2: when the patient here has a pulse rate at or below 87, thus it is not postoperative. Provision 3: when the patient here is rescheduled, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 4: when the patient here is postoperative, thus it is not diabetic. Provision 5: when the patient here has a pulse rate beneath 80, thus it is asthmatic. Provision 6: when the patient here has a fever reading beyond 76, thus it is postoperative. Provision 7: when the patient here is not postoperative, thus it is diabetic. Provision 7 has no effect when the patient here is not admitted. Provision 7 has no effect when the patient here is admitted. Provision 4 has no effect when the patient here is not admitted. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Aurel is diabetic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013800", "pair_id": "u013800-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013800-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "867a43c99f42b151", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u013800-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar has a fever reading of 60. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 62. Aurel has a fever reading of 81. Aurel has a pulse rate of 96. Aurel is rescheduled. Gunnar is not rescheduled.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here has a pulse rate beneath 87, thus it is not asthmatic. Provision 2: when the patient here has a pulse rate at or below 87, thus it is not postoperative. Provision 3: when the patient here is rescheduled, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 4: when the patient here is postoperative, thus it is not diabetic. Provision 5: when the patient here has a pulse rate beneath 80, thus it is asthmatic. Provision 6: when the patient here has a fever reading beyond 76, thus it is postoperative. Provision 7: when the patient here is postoperative, thus it is diabetic. Provision 7 has no effect when the patient here is not admitted. Provision 7 has no effect when the patient here is admitted. Provision 4 has no effect when the patient here is not admitted. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Aurel is diabetic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013800", "pair_id": "u013800-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013800-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "84ce340c65a93fcb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u013800-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar has a fever reading of 60. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 62. Aurel has a fever reading of 81. Aurel has a pulse rate of 96. Aurel is rescheduled. Gunnar is not rescheduled.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has a pulse rate short of 87, it thereby is not asthmatic. Point B. If said patient has a pulse rate of maximum 87, it thereby is not postoperative. Point C. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is hypertensive. Point D. If said patient is postoperative, it thereby is not diabetic. Point E. If said patient has a pulse rate short of 80, it thereby is asthmatic. Point F. If said patient has a fever reading in excess of 76, it thereby is postoperative. Point G. If said patient is not postoperative, it thereby is diabetic. Point G is cancelled if said patient is not admitted. Point G is cancelled if said patient is admitted. Point D is cancelled if said patient is not admitted. Point B supersedes Point F. Point E supersedes Point A. Point G supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Aurel is diabetic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013800", "pair_id": "u013800-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013800-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "867a43c99f42b151", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u013800-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar has a fever reading of 60. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 62. Aurel has a fever reading of 81. Aurel has a pulse rate of 96. Aurel is rescheduled. Gunnar is not rescheduled.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has a pulse rate short of 87, it thereby is not asthmatic. Point B. If said patient has a pulse rate of maximum 87, it thereby is not postoperative. Point C. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is hypertensive. Point D. If said patient is postoperative, it thereby is not diabetic. Point E. If said patient has a pulse rate short of 80, it thereby is asthmatic. Point F. If said patient has a fever reading in excess of 76, it thereby is postoperative. Point G. If said patient is postoperative, it thereby is diabetic. Point G is cancelled if said patient is not admitted. Point G is cancelled if said patient is admitted. Point D is cancelled if said patient is not admitted. Point B supersedes Point F. Point E supersedes Point A. Point G supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Aurel is diabetic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013800", "pair_id": "u013800-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013800-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "84ce340c65a93fcb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u013851-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra is encrypted. Sierra is autoscaled. Sierra has a snapshot.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is throttled, it thereby is not patched. Point B. If said workload is mirrored, it thereby has a firewall. Point C. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby is not throttled. Point D. If said workload is virtualized, it thereby is not isolated. Point E. If said workload is idle, it thereby is containerized. Point F. If said workload is encrypted, it thereby is throttled. Point G. If said workload is throttled, it thereby is idle. Point H. If said workload has a firewall, it thereby is isolated. Point I. If said workload is encrypted, it thereby has no firewall. Point J. If said workload is mirrored, it thereby is virtualized. Point K. If said workload is isolated, it thereby is patched. Point L. If said workload has a snapshot, it thereby is monitored. Point C supersedes Point F. Point A supersedes Point K. Point H supersedes Point D. Point B supersedes Point I. Question: Which choice is true for Sierra?", "options": ["is containerized", "is patched"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is containerized", "unit_id": "u013851", "pair_id": "u013851-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013851-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "b9f0f576c51f407a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a3"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u013851-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra is encrypted. Sierra is mirrored. Sierra is autoscaled. Sierra has a snapshot.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is throttled, it thereby is not patched. Point B. If said workload is mirrored, it thereby has a firewall. Point C. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby is not throttled. Point D. If said workload is virtualized, it thereby is not isolated. Point E. If said workload is idle, it thereby is containerized. Point F. If said workload is encrypted, it thereby is throttled. Point G. If said workload is throttled, it thereby is idle. Point H. If said workload has a firewall, it thereby is isolated. Point I. If said workload is encrypted, it thereby has no firewall. Point J. If said workload is mirrored, it thereby is virtualized. Point K. If said workload is isolated, it thereby is patched. Point L. If said workload has a snapshot, it thereby is monitored. Point C supersedes Point F. Point A supersedes Point K. Point H supersedes Point D. Point B supersedes Point I. Question: Which choice is true for Sierra?", "options": ["is containerized", "is patched"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is containerized", "unit_id": "u013851", "pair_id": "u013851-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013851-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "efb9ea5a716fa684", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a3"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u013881-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is throttled. Vesper is provisioned.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is provisioned, it then is patched. #2 Each time a workload is provisioned, it then is idle. #3 Each time a workload is not provisioned, it then is replicated. #4 Each time a workload is not sharded, it then is not patched. #5 Each time a workload is sharded, it then is not idle. #2 is set aside if a workload is provisioned. #3 is set aside if a workload is not sharded. #4 yields to #1. #5 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Vesper is throttled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013881", "pair_id": "u013881-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013881-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5b44f5a6396659ba", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013881-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper is throttled. Halcyon is throttled. Vesper is provisioned.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is provisioned, it then is patched. #2 Each time a workload is provisioned, it then is idle. #3 Each time a workload is not provisioned, it then is replicated. #4 Each time a workload is not sharded, it then is not patched. #5 Each time a workload is sharded, it then is not idle. #2 is set aside if a workload is provisioned. #3 is set aside if a workload is not sharded. #4 yields to #1. #5 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Vesper is throttled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u013881", "pair_id": "u013881-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013881-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "68346abb2525daaa", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013930-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tomas is vetted. Tomas has a credit rating of 39. Tomas has a repayment grade of 14. Tomas is a homeowner. Tomas is prequalified. Tomas is bankrupt. Tomas has a lien. Tomas is pensioned. Tomas has a risk tier of 2. Tomas is audited.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has a risk tier higher than 87 plus is a homeowner plus has a repayment grade no lower than 47: then it is not a depositor. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has a repayment grade no lower than 85 plus has a credit rating no higher than 41: then it is not foreclosed. Policy III. Suppose that borrower has collateral plus is bankrupt: then it is refinanced. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is vetted plus is pensioned plus is prequalified: then it has collateral. Policy V. Suppose that borrower has a lien plus has a risk tier smaller than 24: then it is not indebted. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower has collateral plus is audited: then it has a mortgage. Policy V is waived if that borrower is prequalified. Policy VI is waived if that borrower is bankrupt. Question: Which choice is right for Tomas?", "options": ["is refinanced", "has a mortgage"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is refinanced", "unit_id": "u013930", "pair_id": "u013930-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013930-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e182b71442b755c6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a11"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u013930-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tomas is vetted. Tomas has a credit rating of 39. Tomas has a repayment grade of 14. Tomas is a homeowner. Tomas is prequalified. Tomas is not bankrupt. Tomas has a lien. Tomas is pensioned. Tomas has a risk tier of 2. Tomas is audited.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has a risk tier higher than 87 plus is a homeowner plus has a repayment grade no lower than 47: then it is not a depositor. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has a repayment grade no lower than 85 plus has a credit rating no higher than 41: then it is not foreclosed. Policy III. Suppose that borrower has collateral plus is bankrupt: then it is refinanced. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is vetted plus is pensioned plus is prequalified: then it has collateral. Policy V. Suppose that borrower has a lien plus has a risk tier smaller than 24: then it is not indebted. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower has collateral plus is audited: then it has a mortgage. Policy V is waived if that borrower is prequalified. Policy VI is waived if that borrower is bankrupt. Question: Which choice is right for Tomas?", "options": ["is refinanced", "has a mortgage"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a mortgage", "unit_id": "u013930", "pair_id": "u013930-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013930-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7ef820134f19b8a8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a11"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u013930-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tomas is vetted. Tomas has a credit rating of 39. Tomas has a repayment grade of 14. Tomas is a homeowner. Tomas is prequalified. Tomas is bankrupt. Tomas has a lien. Tomas is pensioned. Tomas has a risk tier of 2. Tomas is audited.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has a risk tier greater than 87 and additionally is a homeowner and additionally has a repayment grade of 47 or above, it then is not a depositor. #2 Each time a borrower has a repayment grade of 85 or above and additionally has a credit rating of 41 or below, it then is not foreclosed. #3 Each time a borrower has collateral and additionally is bankrupt, it then is refinanced. #4 Each time a borrower is vetted and additionally is pensioned and additionally is prequalified, it then has collateral. #5 Each time a borrower has a lien and additionally has a risk tier less than 24, it then is not indebted. #6 Each time a borrower has collateral and additionally is audited, it then has a mortgage. #5 is set aside if a borrower is prequalified. #6 is set aside if a borrower is bankrupt. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Tomas?", "options": ["is refinanced", "has a mortgage"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is refinanced", "unit_id": "u013930", "pair_id": "u013930-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013930-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e182b71442b755c6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a11"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u013930-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tomas is vetted. Tomas has a credit rating of 39. Tomas has a repayment grade of 14. Tomas is a homeowner. Tomas is prequalified. Tomas is not bankrupt. Tomas has a lien. Tomas is pensioned. Tomas has a risk tier of 2. Tomas is audited.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has a risk tier greater than 87 and additionally is a homeowner and additionally has a repayment grade of 47 or above, it then is not a depositor. #2 Each time a borrower has a repayment grade of 85 or above and additionally has a credit rating of 41 or below, it then is not foreclosed. #3 Each time a borrower has collateral and additionally is bankrupt, it then is refinanced. #4 Each time a borrower is vetted and additionally is pensioned and additionally is prequalified, it then has collateral. #5 Each time a borrower has a lien and additionally has a risk tier less than 24, it then is not indebted. #6 Each time a borrower has collateral and additionally is audited, it then has a mortgage. #5 is set aside if a borrower is prequalified. #6 is set aside if a borrower is bankrupt. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Tomas?", "options": ["is refinanced", "has a mortgage"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a mortgage", "unit_id": "u013930", "pair_id": "u013930-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013930-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7ef820134f19b8a8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a11"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u013965-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is subrogated. Xaver is indemnified. Fabian is not indemnified. Una is indemnified. Una is bundled. Una is not lapsed. Edda is subrogated. Edda is not bundled. Fabian is not lapsed. Una is not subrogated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is indemnified, thus it is not covered. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is not subrogated, thus it has no adjuster. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it is a claimant. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it is covered. Provision 4 has no effect when the policyholder here is bundled. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Edda is lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u013965", "pair_id": "u013965-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/10", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013965-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ba4cfefdc98a7f8e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013965-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is subrogated. Xaver is indemnified. Fabian is not indemnified. Una is indemnified. Una is bundled. Una is not lapsed. Edda is subrogated. Edda is not bundled. Fabian is not lapsed. Una is not subrogated. Edda is not lapsed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is indemnified, thus it is not covered. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is not subrogated, thus it has no adjuster. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it is a claimant. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it is covered. Provision 4 has no effect when the policyholder here is bundled. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Edda is lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u013965", "pair_id": "u013965-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/10", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u013965-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c636bc56ca757af1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u013970-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tomas has a risk tier of 60. Tomas has a debt ratio of 40. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 45. Ingrid has no mortgage. Folke has no mortgage. Anouk has a repayment grade of 33. Tomas has a repayment grade of 65. Tomas has no mortgage. Anouk has a debt ratio of 22. Anouk has a risk tier of 17. Folke has a repayment grade of 59. Folke has a risk tier of 96.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it has a cosigner. (2) If a borrower has a repayment grade above 58, then it is amortized. (3) If a borrower has a risk tier of at least 47, then it is refinanced. (4) If a borrower has a risk tier below 47, then it is bankrupt. (5) If a borrower has a debt ratio of at least 35, then it is solvent. Question: Which option holds for Folke?", "options": ["is bankrupt", "is refinanced", "is solvent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is refinanced", "unit_id": "u013970", "pair_id": "u013970-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013970-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "a680178d5d1e2c7e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a8", "a1", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u013970-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tomas has a risk tier of 60. Tomas has a debt ratio of 40. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 45. Ingrid has no mortgage. Folke has no mortgage. Anouk has a repayment grade of 33. Tomas has a repayment grade of 65. Tomas has no mortgage. Anouk has a debt ratio of 22. Anouk has a risk tier of 17. Folke has a repayment grade of 26. Folke has a risk tier of 96.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it has a cosigner. (2) If a borrower has a repayment grade above 58, then it is amortized. (3) If a borrower has a risk tier of at least 47, then it is refinanced. (4) If a borrower has a risk tier below 47, then it is bankrupt. (5) If a borrower has a debt ratio of at least 35, then it is solvent. Question: Which option holds for Folke?", "options": ["is bankrupt", "is refinanced", "is solvent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is refinanced", "unit_id": "u013970", "pair_id": "u013970-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u013970-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "b2231f10bdb59e8f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a8", "a1", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u014029-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not replicated. Tundra is patched. Sierra is sandboxed. Quasar is backed up. Tundra is not idle. Nimbus is sandboxed. Tundra is not sandboxed. Quasar is not idle. Quasar is replicated. Tundra is not replicated. Nimbus is not patched. Tundra is cached. Quasar is patched. Nimbus is not replicated. Sierra is not backed up. Nimbus is cached. Tundra is backed up. Sierra is cached.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is monitored provided that it is replicated. Section 2: a workload is not autoscaled provided that it is backed up as well as is idle. Section 3: a workload is autoscaled provided that it is sandboxed as well as is patched as well as is cached. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it is cached. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it is cached. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Tundra is replicated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014029", "pair_id": "u014029-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014029-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5826d9cc1249bea2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014029-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not replicated. Tundra is patched. Sierra is sandboxed. Quasar is backed up. Tundra is not idle. Nimbus is sandboxed. Tundra is not sandboxed. Quasar is not idle. Quasar is replicated. Tundra is replicated. Nimbus is not patched. Tundra is cached. Quasar is patched. Nimbus is not replicated. Sierra is not backed up. Nimbus is cached. Tundra is backed up. Sierra is cached.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is monitored provided that it is replicated. Section 2: a workload is not autoscaled provided that it is backed up as well as is idle. Section 3: a workload is autoscaled provided that it is sandboxed as well as is patched as well as is cached. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it is cached. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it is cached. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Tundra is replicated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014029", "pair_id": "u014029-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014029-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e88afbf200298b12", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014057-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar has no postdoc. Izar is cofunded. Izar is not shortlisted. Izar is budgeted. Fomalhaut is longitudinal. Izar is longitudinal. Izar has seed funding. Fomalhaut is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut is shortlisted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has no field site provided that it is peer reviewed as well as is longitudinal as well as is cofunded. Section 2: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 3: a proposal is interdisciplinary provided that it is budgeted. Section 4: a proposal has a field site provided that it is peer reviewed as well as is shortlisted as well as has a postdoc. Section 5: a proposal is translational provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 5 lapses for a proposal if it is resubmitted. Section 1 lapses for a proposal if it is theoretical. Question: Izar has a field site. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014057", "pair_id": "u014057-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014057-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0cb5ec07b506114d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014057-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar has no postdoc. Izar is cofunded. Izar is not shortlisted. Izar is budgeted. Fomalhaut is longitudinal. Izar is longitudinal. Izar has seed funding. Fomalhaut is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut is shortlisted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is embargoed provided that it has seed funding. Section 2: a proposal has no field site provided that it is peer reviewed as well as is longitudinal as well as is cofunded. Section 3: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 4: a proposal is interdisciplinary provided that it is budgeted. Section 5: a proposal has a field site provided that it is peer reviewed as well as is shortlisted as well as has a postdoc. Section 6: a proposal is translational provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 6 lapses for a proposal if it is resubmitted. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it is theoretical. Question: Izar has a field site. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014057", "pair_id": "u014057-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014057-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "902f8acfa59c9cc4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014106-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is shortlisted. Hadar has a team size of 47. Hadar has a milestone total of 36. Hadar is translational. Hadar is multicenter. Hadar has a citation index of 31. Betelgeuse has a team size of 60. Betelgeuse is shortlisted. Hadar has a review mark of 87. Betelgeuse is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse has a milestone total of 61. Hadar is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has seed funding provided that it is budgeted as well as has a team size exceeding 64 as well as has a milestone total of 34 or higher. Section 2: a proposal is renewed provided that it has a team size exceeding 47. Section 3: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it has a milestone total of 84 or lower as well as is not shortlisted. Section 4: a proposal is embargoed provided that it is budgeted as well as has a team size of 64 or lower as well as is multicenter. Section 5: a proposal is budgeted provided that it has a citation index exceeding 16 as well as is peer reviewed. Section 6: a proposal is endorsed provided that it is translational as well as has a review mark of 60 or lower as well as is not interdisciplinary. Question: Which statement fits Hadar?", "options": ["has seed funding", "is embargoed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is embargoed", "unit_id": "u014106", "pair_id": "u014106-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014106-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "cc1e406792a951ef", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a8"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014106-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is shortlisted. Hadar has a team size of 61. Hadar has a milestone total of 36. Hadar is translational. Hadar is multicenter. Hadar has a citation index of 31. Betelgeuse has a team size of 60. Betelgeuse is shortlisted. Hadar has a review mark of 87. Betelgeuse is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse has a milestone total of 61. Hadar is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has seed funding provided that it is budgeted as well as has a team size exceeding 64 as well as has a milestone total of 34 or higher. Section 2: a proposal is renewed provided that it has a team size exceeding 47. Section 3: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it has a milestone total of 84 or lower as well as is not shortlisted. Section 4: a proposal is embargoed provided that it is budgeted as well as has a team size of 64 or lower as well as is multicenter. Section 5: a proposal is budgeted provided that it has a citation index exceeding 16 as well as is peer reviewed. Section 6: a proposal is endorsed provided that it is translational as well as has a review mark of 60 or lower as well as is not interdisciplinary. Question: Which statement fits Hadar?", "options": ["has seed funding", "is embargoed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is embargoed", "unit_id": "u014106", "pair_id": "u014106-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014106-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "f8a921da9b5c8ded", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a8"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014148-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma has no patent filing. Gemma is cofunded. Gemma is exploratory. Nashira is exploratory. Nashira is not translational.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is exploratory, that proposal is collaborative. Item B. When the proposal is translational, that proposal has industry backing. Item C. When the proposal has no patent filing, that proposal has no industry backing. Item D. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is budgeted. Item E. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is endorsed. Question: Can one infer that Gemma has industry backing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014148", "pair_id": "u014148-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014148-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "9dec52c9458e9a16", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014148-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma has no patent filing. Gemma is cofunded. Gemma is exploratory. Nashira is exploratory. Nashira is not translational.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is exploratory, that proposal is collaborative. Item B. When the proposal is translational, that proposal has industry backing. Item C. When the proposal has a patent filing, that proposal has no industry backing. Item D. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is budgeted. Item E. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is endorsed. Question: Can one infer that Gemma has industry backing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014148", "pair_id": "u014148-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014148-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "6e3aee13ac7dd2e1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014181-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una has a deductible waiver. Una has a peril factor of 9. Viggo has a peril factor of 70. Una has roadside assistance. Una has no dashcam. Viggo has no dashcam. Viggo has no roadside assistance. Viggo has a deductible waiver.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is subrogated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has no beneficiary, thus it is uninsurable. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has no roadside assistance, thus it is not uninsurable. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is not covered. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it has no beneficiary. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has no deductible waiver, thus it is disputed. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is not retired, thus it is covered. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary, thus it is not disputed. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here has a peril factor at or below 81. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here has a dashcam. Provision 8 has no effect when the policyholder here is retired. Provision 2 has no effect when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver. Provision 9 has no effect when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver. Provision 8 has no effect when the policyholder here has no deductible waiver. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Viggo has no beneficiary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014181", "pair_id": "u014181-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014181-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0458996bc5146167", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014181-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una has a deductible waiver. Una has a peril factor of 9. Viggo has a peril factor of 70. Viggo is not retired. Una has roadside assistance. Una has no dashcam. Viggo has no dashcam. Viggo has no roadside assistance. Viggo has a deductible waiver.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is subrogated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has no beneficiary, thus it is uninsurable. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has no roadside assistance, thus it is not uninsurable. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is not covered. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it has no beneficiary. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has no deductible waiver, thus it is disputed. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is not retired, thus it is covered. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary, thus it is not disputed. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here has a peril factor at or below 81. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here has a dashcam. Provision 8 has no effect when the policyholder here is retired. Provision 2 has no effect when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver. Provision 9 has no effect when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver. Provision 8 has no effect when the policyholder here has no deductible waiver. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Viggo has no beneficiary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014181", "pair_id": "u014181-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014181-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1c65331216776af3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014181-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una has a deductible waiver. Una has a peril factor of 9. Viggo has a peril factor of 70. Una has roadside assistance. Una has no dashcam. Viggo has no dashcam. Viggo has no roadside assistance. Viggo has a deductible waiver.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has a deductible waiver, it thereby is subrogated. Point B. If said policyholder has no beneficiary, it thereby is uninsurable. Point C. If said policyholder has no roadside assistance, it thereby is not uninsurable. Point D. If said policyholder has roadside assistance, it thereby is not covered. Point E. If said policyholder is subrogated, it thereby has no beneficiary. Point F. If said policyholder has no deductible waiver, it thereby is disputed. Point G. If said policyholder is not retired, it thereby is covered. Point H. If said policyholder is subrogated, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point I. If said policyholder has a beneficiary, it thereby is not disputed. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder has a peril factor of maximum 81. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder has a dashcam. Point H is cancelled if said policyholder is retired. Point B is cancelled if said policyholder has a deductible waiver. Point I is cancelled if said policyholder has a deductible waiver. Point H is cancelled if said policyholder has no deductible waiver. Point B supersedes Point C. Point H supersedes Point E. Point I supersedes Point F. Point G supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Viggo has no beneficiary. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014181", "pair_id": "u014181-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014181-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0458996bc5146167", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014181-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una has a deductible waiver. Una has a peril factor of 9. Viggo has a peril factor of 70. Viggo is not retired. Una has roadside assistance. Una has no dashcam. Viggo has no dashcam. Viggo has no roadside assistance. Viggo has a deductible waiver.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has a deductible waiver, it thereby is subrogated. Point B. If said policyholder has no beneficiary, it thereby is uninsurable. Point C. If said policyholder has no roadside assistance, it thereby is not uninsurable. Point D. If said policyholder has roadside assistance, it thereby is not covered. Point E. If said policyholder is subrogated, it thereby has no beneficiary. Point F. If said policyholder has no deductible waiver, it thereby is disputed. Point G. If said policyholder is not retired, it thereby is covered. Point H. If said policyholder is subrogated, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point I. If said policyholder has a beneficiary, it thereby is not disputed. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder has a peril factor of maximum 81. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder has a dashcam. Point H is cancelled if said policyholder is retired. Point B is cancelled if said policyholder has a deductible waiver. Point I is cancelled if said policyholder has a deductible waiver. Point H is cancelled if said policyholder has no deductible waiver. Point B supersedes Point C. Point H supersedes Point E. Point I supersedes Point F. Point G supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Viggo has no beneficiary. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014181", "pair_id": "u014181-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014181-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1c65331216776af3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014201-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is sealed. Liesel is labeled. Liesel is refrigerated. Liesel is registered. Liesel has a barcode. Liesel is fragile.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is refrigerated, then it is not hazardous. (2) If a parcel is not labeled and is refrigerated and is registered, then it is undeliverable. (3) If a parcel is refrigerated, then it is hazardous. (4) If a parcel is not refrigerated and is not sealed and is fragile, then it is not scanned. (5) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a barcode, then it is scanned. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (1) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Liesel is not scanned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014201", "pair_id": "u014201-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014201-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f228f3a77b364a83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014201-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is sealed. Liesel is labeled. Liesel is refrigerated. Liesel is registered. Liesel has a barcode. Liesel is fragile.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is refrigerated, then it is not hazardous. (2) If a parcel is not labeled and is refrigerated and is registered, then it is undeliverable. (3) If a parcel is refrigerated, then it is hazardous. (4) If a parcel is not refrigerated and is not sealed and is fragile, then it is not scanned. (5) If a parcel is not refrigerated and has a barcode, then it is scanned. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (1) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Liesel is not scanned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014201", "pair_id": "u014201-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014201-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f16a8c21ce81eba7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014227-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ivo is not freelance. Mads is freelance. Mads is headhunted. Ivo is headhunted. Mads is recommended. Ivo is not bonded.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is freelance: then it is bilingual. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is bonded: then it is not relocating. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is not headhunted: then it has a signing bonus. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is bonded: then it is interviewed. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it is not bilingual. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is not bonded: then it is licensed. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it is onboarded. Policy VIII. Suppose that candidate is bonded: then it is relocating. Policy VI is waived if that candidate is recommended. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy II. Question: Which choice is right for Mads?", "options": ["has a signing bonus", "is onboarded", "is licensed", "is interviewed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is onboarded", "unit_id": "u014227", "pair_id": "u014227-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014227-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "89dd87e3c1b18cb1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a3", "a4", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u014227-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ivo is not freelance. Mads is freelance. Mads is not headhunted. Ivo is headhunted. Mads is recommended. Ivo is not bonded.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is freelance: then it is bilingual. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is bonded: then it is not relocating. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is not headhunted: then it has a signing bonus. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is bonded: then it is interviewed. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it is not bilingual. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is not bonded: then it is licensed. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it is onboarded. Policy VIII. Suppose that candidate is bonded: then it is relocating. Policy VI is waived if that candidate is recommended. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy II. Question: Which choice is right for Mads?", "options": ["has a signing bonus", "is onboarded", "is licensed", "is interviewed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a signing bonus", "unit_id": "u014227", "pair_id": "u014227-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014227-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5e970babe5137c57", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a3", "a4", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u014228-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirela has a weight class of 11. Mirela has a delivery window of 47. Mirela has a barcode. Mirela has a postal zone of 33. Mirela is damaged. Mirela has a parcel volume of 37. Mirela is sealed. Mirela is not scanned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is hazardous and also is scanned and also has a barcode, it also has a courier. Clause 2: once any parcel has a parcel volume under 39 and also is damaged and also is labeled, it also is hazardous. Clause 3: once any parcel has a postal zone of 59 or more, it also is not tracked. Clause 4: once any parcel has a parcel volume under 39 and also has a weight class under 18, it also is palletized. Clause 5: once any parcel has a parcel volume under 39 and also has a weight class of 18 or more, it also is refrigerated. Clause 6: once any parcel is palletized and also has a delivery window of 46 or less, it also is tracked. Clause 7: once any parcel is sealed and also has a postal zone over 40, it also is oversized. Clause 8: once any parcel has a weight class of 81 or less, it also is not oversized. Clause 8 overrides Clause 7. Clause 6 overrides Clause 3. Question: Which of these is true of Mirela?", "options": ["is hazardous", "is palletized", "is refrigerated"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is palletized", "unit_id": "u014228", "pair_id": "u014228-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014228-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "417afbff68bf481a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a8", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u014228-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirela has a weight class of 11. Mirela has a delivery window of 23. Mirela has a barcode. Mirela has a postal zone of 33. Mirela is damaged. Mirela has a parcel volume of 37. Mirela is sealed. Mirela is not scanned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is hazardous and also is scanned and also has a barcode, it also has a courier. Clause 2: once any parcel has a parcel volume under 39 and also is damaged and also is labeled, it also is hazardous. Clause 3: once any parcel has a postal zone of 59 or more, it also is not tracked. Clause 4: once any parcel has a parcel volume under 39 and also has a weight class under 18, it also is palletized. Clause 5: once any parcel has a parcel volume under 39 and also has a weight class of 18 or more, it also is refrigerated. Clause 6: once any parcel is palletized and also has a delivery window of 46 or less, it also is tracked. Clause 7: once any parcel is sealed and also has a postal zone over 40, it also is oversized. Clause 8: once any parcel has a weight class of 81 or less, it also is not oversized. Clause 8 overrides Clause 7. Clause 6 overrides Clause 3. Question: Which of these is true of Mirela?", "options": ["is hazardous", "is palletized", "is refrigerated"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is palletized", "unit_id": "u014228", "pair_id": "u014228-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014228-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "35b87a85cae13135", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a8", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u014266-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Olek is not headhunted. Olek is not eligible. Olek is probationary. Olek has no portfolio. Olek has a visa. Olek is recommended. Olek has a diploma. Olek is seasoned.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is not eligible and is headhunted and has no portfolio, then it is a veteran. (2) If a candidate is eligible, then it is onboarded. (3) If a candidate is seasoned, then it is not freelance. (4) If a candidate is not eligible and is not headhunted, then it is a graduate. (5) If a candidate is not eligible and is recommended and is not fingerprinted, then it is freelance. (6) If a candidate is not probationary and has no diploma, then it is not onboarded. (7) If a candidate is not eligible and is not recommended, then it is bonded. (8) If a candidate is not eligible and has no visa, then it is bilingual. When (6) and (2) clash, (6) prevails. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Olek?", "options": ["is freelance", "is bonded", "is bilingual", "is a veteran", "is a graduate"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a graduate", "unit_id": "u014266", "pair_id": "u014266-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014266-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7b6c1485bbec0b63", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a5", "a8", "a12", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u014266-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Olek is headhunted. Olek is not eligible. Olek is probationary. Olek has no portfolio. Olek has a visa. Olek is recommended. Olek has a diploma. Olek is seasoned.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is not eligible and is headhunted and has no portfolio, then it is a veteran. (2) If a candidate is eligible, then it is onboarded. (3) If a candidate is seasoned, then it is not freelance. (4) If a candidate is not eligible and is not headhunted, then it is a graduate. (5) If a candidate is not eligible and is recommended and is not fingerprinted, then it is freelance. (6) If a candidate is not probationary and has no diploma, then it is not onboarded. (7) If a candidate is not eligible and is not recommended, then it is bonded. (8) If a candidate is not eligible and has no visa, then it is bilingual. When (6) and (2) clash, (6) prevails. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Olek?", "options": ["is freelance", "is bonded", "is bilingual", "is a veteran", "is a graduate"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a veteran", "unit_id": "u014266", "pair_id": "u014266-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014266-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "28990d62c3b656dc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a5", "a8", "a12", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u014266-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Olek is not headhunted. Olek is not eligible. Olek is probationary. Olek has no portfolio. Olek has a visa. Olek is recommended. Olek has a diploma. Olek is seasoned.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is not eligible, and is headhunted, and has no portfolio, that candidate is a veteran. Item B. When the candidate is eligible, that candidate is onboarded. Item C. When the candidate is seasoned, that candidate is not freelance. Item D. When the candidate is not eligible, and is not headhunted, that candidate is a graduate. Item E. When the candidate is not eligible, and is recommended, and is not fingerprinted, that candidate is freelance. Item F. When the candidate is not probationary, and has no diploma, that candidate is not onboarded. Item G. When the candidate is not eligible, and is not recommended, that candidate is bonded. Item H. When the candidate is not eligible, and has no visa, that candidate is bilingual. Item F outranks Item B. Item C outranks Item E. Question: What applies to Olek?", "options": ["is freelance", "is bonded", "is bilingual", "is a veteran", "is a graduate"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a graduate", "unit_id": "u014266", "pair_id": "u014266-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014266-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7b6c1485bbec0b63", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a5", "a8", "a12", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u014266-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Olek is headhunted. Olek is not eligible. Olek is probationary. Olek has no portfolio. Olek has a visa. Olek is recommended. Olek has a diploma. Olek is seasoned.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is not eligible, and is headhunted, and has no portfolio, that candidate is a veteran. Item B. When the candidate is eligible, that candidate is onboarded. Item C. When the candidate is seasoned, that candidate is not freelance. Item D. When the candidate is not eligible, and is not headhunted, that candidate is a graduate. Item E. When the candidate is not eligible, and is recommended, and is not fingerprinted, that candidate is freelance. Item F. When the candidate is not probationary, and has no diploma, that candidate is not onboarded. Item G. When the candidate is not eligible, and is not recommended, that candidate is bonded. Item H. When the candidate is not eligible, and has no visa, that candidate is bilingual. Item F outranks Item B. Item C outranks Item E. Question: What applies to Olek?", "options": ["is freelance", "is bonded", "is bilingual", "is a veteran", "is a graduate"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a veteran", "unit_id": "u014266", "pair_id": "u014266-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014266-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "28990d62c3b656dc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a5", "a8", "a12", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u014288-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is ambulatory. Xenia is not waitlisted. Florin is not hypertensive. Dorian is not postoperative. Florin is waitlisted. Florin is not postoperative. Xenia has a mobility rank of 55. Xenia has a fever reading of 86. Florin is ambulatory. Florin has a fever reading of 24.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is pregnant provided that it is waitlisted as well as is hypertensive. Section 2: a patient is diabetic provided that it is admitted as well as has a fever reading lower than 14 as well as is ambulatory. Section 3: a patient is admitted provided that it is not sedated. Section 4: a patient is not sedated provided that it is not postoperative. Section 5: a patient is not diabetic provided that it is admitted as well as has a fever reading of 14 or higher as well as is ambulatory. Section 5 lapses for a patient if it has a fever reading of 70 or lower as well as has a mobility rank exceeding 36. Question: Florin is diabetic. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014288", "pair_id": "u014288-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014288-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8540291d9141ffce", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 35}}
{"id": "syn-u014288-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is ambulatory. Xenia is not waitlisted. Florin is not hypertensive. Dorian is not postoperative. Florin is waitlisted. Florin is not postoperative. Xenia has a mobility rank of 55. Xenia has a fever reading of 86. Florin is ambulatory. Florin has a fever reading of 24.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is pregnant provided that it is waitlisted as well as is hypertensive. Section 2: a patient is diabetic provided that it is admitted as well as has a fever reading lower than 14 as well as is ambulatory. Section 3: a patient is admitted provided that it is not sedated. Section 4: a patient is not sedated provided that it is postoperative. Section 5: a patient is not diabetic provided that it is admitted as well as has a fever reading of 14 or higher as well as is ambulatory. Section 5 lapses for a patient if it has a fever reading of 70 or lower as well as has a mobility rank exceeding 36. Question: Florin is diabetic. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014288", "pair_id": "u014288-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014288-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "db12a11fef92c862", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 35}}
{"id": "syn-u014324-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not documented. Shale is documented. Galena has a test yield of 94. Shale is not reverted. Galena is not fuzzed. Galena is not reverted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is compiled provided that it is not documented as well as has a test yield lower than 12. Section 2: a build is tagged provided that it is not localized as well as has a test yield exceeding 95. Section 3: a build is not flaky provided that it has a test yield of 77 or lower as well as is reverted. Section 4: a build is linted provided that it is not fuzzed. Section 5: a build is not tagged provided that it is not localized as well as has a test yield of 49 or lower. Section 6: a build is not localized provided that it is linted. Question: Galena is not tagged. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014324", "pair_id": "u014324-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014324-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "6c3457de13988b51", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014324-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not documented. Shale is documented. Galena has a test yield of 94. Shale is not reverted. Galena is not fuzzed. Galena is not reverted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is compiled provided that it is not documented as well as has a test yield lower than 12. Section 2: a build is tagged provided that it is not localized as well as has a test yield exceeding 49. Section 3: a build is not flaky provided that it has a test yield of 77 or lower as well as is reverted. Section 4: a build is linted provided that it is not fuzzed. Section 5: a build is not tagged provided that it is not localized as well as has a test yield of 49 or lower. Section 6: a build is not localized provided that it is linted. Question: Galena is not tagged. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014324", "pair_id": "u014324-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014324-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5e018a4784b938cb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014324-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not documented. Shale is documented. Galena has a test yield of 94. Shale is not reverted. Galena is not fuzzed. Galena is not reverted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is not documented and additionally has a test yield less than 12, it then is compiled. #2 Each time a build is not localized and additionally has a test yield greater than 95, it then is tagged. #3 Each time a build has a test yield of 77 or below and additionally is reverted, it then is not flaky. #4 Each time a build is not fuzzed, it then is linted. #5 Each time a build is not localized and additionally has a test yield of 49 or below, it then is not tagged. #6 Each time a build is linted, it then is not localized. Question: Do the terms above show that Galena is not tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014324", "pair_id": "u014324-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014324-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "6c3457de13988b51", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014324-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not documented. Shale is documented. Galena has a test yield of 94. Shale is not reverted. Galena is not fuzzed. Galena is not reverted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is not documented and additionally has a test yield less than 12, it then is compiled. #2 Each time a build is not localized and additionally has a test yield greater than 49, it then is tagged. #3 Each time a build has a test yield of 77 or below and additionally is reverted, it then is not flaky. #4 Each time a build is not fuzzed, it then is linted. #5 Each time a build is not localized and additionally has a test yield of 49 or below, it then is not tagged. #6 Each time a build is linted, it then is not localized. Question: Do the terms above show that Galena is not tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014324", "pair_id": "u014324-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014324-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5e018a4784b938cb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014350-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has a dashcam. Una is disputed. Yara is lapsed. Una has a premium discount. Yara has no premium discount. Wanda has a premium discount. Una has a peril factor of 86. Yara has a premium band of 56. Wanda is disputed. Una has a premium band of 93. Una has a dashcam.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance and likewise has a premium band not above 13, so it is not retired. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver and likewise has a dashcam, so it has roadside assistance. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a premium discount and likewise has a dashcam and likewise has a peril factor not below 85, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 4 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance and likewise has a premium band that exceeds 13, so it is retired. No. 5 While the given policyholder is lapsed and likewise is inspected, so it has no deductible waiver. No. 1 wins over No. 4. No. 3 wins over No. 5. Question: Is the claim \"Una is not retired\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014350", "pair_id": "u014350-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014350-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ca17568d3b3e0f12", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014350-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has a dashcam. Una is disputed. Yara is lapsed. Una has a premium discount. Yara has no premium discount. Wanda has a premium discount. Una has a peril factor of 86. Yara has a premium band of 56. Wanda is disputed. Una has a premium band of 93. Una has a dashcam.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance and likewise has a premium band not above 13, so it is not retired. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver and likewise has a dashcam, so it has roadside assistance. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a premium discount and likewise has a dashcam and likewise has a peril factor not below 85, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 4 While the given policyholder is disputed and likewise has a premium discount, so it is litigated. No. 5 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance and likewise has a premium band that exceeds 13, so it is retired. No. 6 While the given policyholder is lapsed and likewise is inspected, so it has no deductible waiver. No. 1 wins over No. 5. No. 3 wins over No. 6. Question: Is the claim \"Una is not retired\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014350", "pair_id": "u014350-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014350-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4c99edacb20f909e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014353-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not interdisciplinary. Kochab is not peer reviewed. Kochab is not translational.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is not translational, then it has a steering committee. (2) If a proposal is not peer reviewed, then it has no industry backing. (3) If a proposal is interdisciplinary, then it is renewed. (4) If a proposal is renewed, then it is theoretical. (5) If a proposal is not exploratory, then it has no steering committee. (6) If a proposal is not peer reviewed, then it is not renewed. (7) If a proposal is not renewed, then it is not theoretical. (8) If a proposal is endorsed, then it is multicenter. (4) is void if the proposal is not peer reviewed. (4) is void if the proposal is not exploratory. (7) is void if the proposal is peer reviewed. (1) is void if the proposal is peer reviewed. When (3) and (6) clash, (3) prevails. When (1) and (5) clash, (1) prevails. When (7) and (4) clash, (7) prevails. Question: Is it true that Kochab is theoretical?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014353", "pair_id": "u014353-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014353-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "33b0e0991de1dc81", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u014353-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not interdisciplinary. Kochab is not peer reviewed. Kochab is not translational.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is not translational, then it has a steering committee. (2) If a proposal is not peer reviewed, then it has no industry backing. (3) If a proposal is interdisciplinary, then it is renewed. (4) If a proposal is renewed, then it is theoretical. (5) If a proposal is not exploratory, then it has no steering committee. (6) If a proposal is not peer reviewed, then it is not renewed. (7) If a proposal is renewed, then it is not theoretical. (8) If a proposal is endorsed, then it is multicenter. (4) is void if the proposal is not peer reviewed. (4) is void if the proposal is not exploratory. (7) is void if the proposal is peer reviewed. (1) is void if the proposal is peer reviewed. When (3) and (6) clash, (3) prevails. When (1) and (5) clash, (1) prevails. When (7) and (4) clash, (7) prevails. Question: Is it true that Kochab is theoretical?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014353", "pair_id": "u014353-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014353-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d91a53d19deb2f43", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u014353-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not interdisciplinary. Kochab is not peer reviewed. Kochab is not translational.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is not translational, it also has a steering committee. Clause 2: once any proposal is not peer reviewed, it also has no industry backing. Clause 3: once any proposal is interdisciplinary, it also is renewed. Clause 4: once any proposal is renewed, it also is theoretical. Clause 5: once any proposal is not exploratory, it also has no steering committee. Clause 6: once any proposal is not peer reviewed, it also is not renewed. Clause 7: once any proposal is not renewed, it also is not theoretical. Clause 8: once any proposal is endorsed, it also is multicenter. Clause 4 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not peer reviewed. Clause 4 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not exploratory. Clause 7 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is peer reviewed. Clause 1 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is peer reviewed. Clause 3 overrides Clause 6. Clause 1 overrides Clause 5. Clause 7 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Kochab is theoretical?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014353", "pair_id": "u014353-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014353-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "33b0e0991de1dc81", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u014353-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not interdisciplinary. Kochab is not peer reviewed. Kochab is not translational.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is not translational, it also has a steering committee. Clause 2: once any proposal is not peer reviewed, it also has no industry backing. Clause 3: once any proposal is interdisciplinary, it also is renewed. Clause 4: once any proposal is renewed, it also is theoretical. Clause 5: once any proposal is not exploratory, it also has no steering committee. Clause 6: once any proposal is not peer reviewed, it also is not renewed. Clause 7: once any proposal is renewed, it also is not theoretical. Clause 8: once any proposal is endorsed, it also is multicenter. Clause 4 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not peer reviewed. Clause 4 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not exploratory. Clause 7 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is peer reviewed. Clause 1 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is peer reviewed. Clause 3 overrides Clause 6. Clause 1 overrides Clause 5. Clause 7 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Kochab is theoretical?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014353", "pair_id": "u014353-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014353-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d91a53d19deb2f43", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u014387-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Agata is bundled. Celeste is uninsurable. Celeste is bundled. Agata has no dashcam. Agata is reimbursed. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 21. Agata has a payout ceiling of 5.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a deductible waiver, then it has flood coverage. (2) If a policyholder has flood coverage, then it is inspected. (3) If a policyholder has a premium band of at least 74, then it has no rider. (4) If a policyholder is reimbursed, then it has a beneficiary. (5) If a policyholder is bundled, then it has no roadside assistance. (6) If a policyholder is retired, then it has no rider. (7) If a policyholder is appraised, then it has a rider. (8) If a policyholder is retired, then it is covered. (9) If a policyholder has a payout ceiling above 10, then it is not retired. (10) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it is appraised. (11) If a policyholder is uninsurable, then it is retired. (12) If a policyholder has a premium band below 82, then it has a deductible waiver. (13) If a policyholder is covered, then it is indemnified. When (6) and (7) clash, (6) prevails. When (7) and (3) clash, (7) prevails. When (9) and (11) clash, (9) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Agata?", "options": ["is indemnified", "is inspected", "has a rider"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a rider", "unit_id": "u014387", "pair_id": "u014387-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014387-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e2811187ae95eae0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a15"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u014387-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Agata is uninsurable. Agata is bundled. Celeste is uninsurable. Celeste is bundled. Agata has no dashcam. Agata is reimbursed. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 21. Agata has a payout ceiling of 5.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a deductible waiver, then it has flood coverage. (2) If a policyholder has flood coverage, then it is inspected. (3) If a policyholder has a premium band of at least 74, then it has no rider. (4) If a policyholder is reimbursed, then it has a beneficiary. (5) If a policyholder is bundled, then it has no roadside assistance. (6) If a policyholder is retired, then it has no rider. (7) If a policyholder is appraised, then it has a rider. (8) If a policyholder is retired, then it is covered. (9) If a policyholder has a payout ceiling above 10, then it is not retired. (10) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it is appraised. (11) If a policyholder is uninsurable, then it is retired. (12) If a policyholder has a premium band below 82, then it has a deductible waiver. (13) If a policyholder is covered, then it is indemnified. When (6) and (7) clash, (6) prevails. When (7) and (3) clash, (7) prevails. When (9) and (11) clash, (9) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Agata?", "options": ["is indemnified", "is inspected", "has a rider"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is indemnified", "unit_id": "u014387", "pair_id": "u014387-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014387-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "da36fba7dbbb6f1a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a15"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u014387-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Agata is bundled. Celeste is uninsurable. Celeste is bundled. Agata has no dashcam. Agata is reimbursed. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 21. Agata has a payout ceiling of 5.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also has flood coverage. Clause 2: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also is inspected. Clause 3: once any policyholder has a premium band of 74 or more, it also has no rider. Clause 4: once any policyholder is reimbursed, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 5: once any policyholder is bundled, it also has no roadside assistance. Clause 6: once any policyholder is retired, it also has no rider. Clause 7: once any policyholder is appraised, it also has a rider. Clause 8: once any policyholder is retired, it also is covered. Clause 9: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling over 10, it also is not retired. Clause 10: once any policyholder has a beneficiary, it also is appraised. Clause 11: once any policyholder is uninsurable, it also is retired. Clause 12: once any policyholder has a premium band under 82, it also has a deductible waiver. Clause 13: once any policyholder is covered, it also is indemnified. Clause 6 overrides Clause 7. Clause 7 overrides Clause 3. Clause 9 overrides Clause 11. Question: Which of these is true of Agata?", "options": ["is indemnified", "is inspected", "has a rider"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a rider", "unit_id": "u014387", "pair_id": "u014387-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014387-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e2811187ae95eae0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a15"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u014387-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Agata is uninsurable. Agata is bundled. Celeste is uninsurable. Celeste is bundled. Agata has no dashcam. Agata is reimbursed. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 21. Agata has a payout ceiling of 5.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also has flood coverage. Clause 2: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also is inspected. Clause 3: once any policyholder has a premium band of 74 or more, it also has no rider. Clause 4: once any policyholder is reimbursed, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 5: once any policyholder is bundled, it also has no roadside assistance. Clause 6: once any policyholder is retired, it also has no rider. Clause 7: once any policyholder is appraised, it also has a rider. Clause 8: once any policyholder is retired, it also is covered. Clause 9: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling over 10, it also is not retired. Clause 10: once any policyholder has a beneficiary, it also is appraised. Clause 11: once any policyholder is uninsurable, it also is retired. Clause 12: once any policyholder has a premium band under 82, it also has a deductible waiver. Clause 13: once any policyholder is covered, it also is indemnified. Clause 6 overrides Clause 7. Clause 7 overrides Clause 3. Clause 9 overrides Clause 11. Question: Which of these is true of Agata?", "options": ["is indemnified", "is inspected", "has a rider"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is indemnified", "unit_id": "u014387", "pair_id": "u014387-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014387-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "da36fba7dbbb6f1a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a15"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u014401-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not compiled. Schist has a test yield of 36. Schist is not reproducible. Schist has a patch cycle of 61. Schist is not versioned.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is versioned, then it is tested. (2) If a build is not tested, then it is flaky. (3) If a build is flaky, then it is not reverted. (4) If a build has a patch cycle above 18, then it is not tested. (5) If a build is versioned, then it has no security advisory. (6) If a build is versioned, then it has a security advisory. (7) If a build is compiled, then it is not obsolete. (8) If a build is flaky, then it is reverted. (1) is void if the build is reproducible. (3) is void if the build has a test yield of at most 56. (8) is void if the build has a test yield above 56. (7) is void if the build is versioned. When (4) and (1) clash, (4) prevails. When (8) and (3) clash, (8) prevails. When (5) and (6) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Schist is reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014401", "pair_id": "u014401-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014401-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "73f8df89759f9560", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014401-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not compiled. Schist has a test yield of 36. Schist is not reproducible. Schist has a patch cycle of 29. Schist is not versioned.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is versioned, then it is tested. (2) If a build is not tested, then it is flaky. (3) If a build is flaky, then it is not reverted. (4) If a build has a patch cycle above 18, then it is not tested. (5) If a build is versioned, then it has no security advisory. (6) If a build is versioned, then it has a security advisory. (7) If a build is compiled, then it is not obsolete. (8) If a build is flaky, then it is reverted. (1) is void if the build is reproducible. (3) is void if the build has a test yield of at most 56. (8) is void if the build has a test yield above 56. (7) is void if the build is versioned. When (4) and (1) clash, (4) prevails. When (8) and (3) clash, (8) prevails. When (5) and (6) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Schist is reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014401", "pair_id": "u014401-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014401-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "69c9e6514deb7582", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014401-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not compiled. Schist has a test yield of 36. Schist is not reproducible. Schist has a patch cycle of 61. Schist is not versioned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is versioned, it also is tested. Clause 2: once any build is not tested, it also is flaky. Clause 3: once any build is flaky, it also is not reverted. Clause 4: once any build has a patch cycle over 18, it also is not tested. Clause 5: once any build is versioned, it also has no security advisory. Clause 6: once any build is versioned, it also has a security advisory. Clause 7: once any build is compiled, it also is not obsolete. Clause 8: once any build is flaky, it also is reverted. Clause 1 does not hold for a build when any build is reproducible. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build has a test yield of 56 or less. Clause 8 does not hold for a build when any build has a test yield over 56. Clause 7 does not hold for a build when any build is versioned. Clause 4 overrides Clause 1. Clause 8 overrides Clause 3. Clause 5 overrides Clause 6. Question: Does it follow that Schist is reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014401", "pair_id": "u014401-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014401-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "73f8df89759f9560", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014401-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not compiled. Schist has a test yield of 36. Schist is not reproducible. Schist has a patch cycle of 29. Schist is not versioned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is versioned, it also is tested. Clause 2: once any build is not tested, it also is flaky. Clause 3: once any build is flaky, it also is not reverted. Clause 4: once any build has a patch cycle over 18, it also is not tested. Clause 5: once any build is versioned, it also has no security advisory. Clause 6: once any build is versioned, it also has a security advisory. Clause 7: once any build is compiled, it also is not obsolete. Clause 8: once any build is flaky, it also is reverted. Clause 1 does not hold for a build when any build is reproducible. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build has a test yield of 56 or less. Clause 8 does not hold for a build when any build has a test yield over 56. Clause 7 does not hold for a build when any build is versioned. Clause 4 overrides Clause 1. Clause 8 overrides Clause 3. Clause 5 overrides Clause 6. Question: Does it follow that Schist is reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014401", "pair_id": "u014401-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014401-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "69c9e6514deb7582", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014401-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not compiled. Schist has a test yield of 36. Schist is not reproducible. Schist has a patch cycle of 61. Schist is not versioned.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is versioned, that build is tested. Item B. When the build is not tested, that build is flaky. Item C. When the build is flaky, that build is not reverted. Item D. When the build has a patch cycle of more than 18, that build is not tested. Item E. When the build is versioned, that build has no security advisory. Item F. When the build is versioned, that build has a security advisory. Item G. When the build is compiled, that build is not obsolete. Item H. When the build is flaky, that build is reverted. Item A is suspended when the build is reproducible. Item C is suspended when the build has a test yield of no more than 56. Item H is suspended when the build has a test yield of more than 56. Item G is suspended when the build is versioned. Item D outranks Item A. Item H outranks Item C. Item E outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Schist is reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014401", "pair_id": "u014401-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014401-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "73f8df89759f9560", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014401-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not compiled. Schist has a test yield of 36. Schist is not reproducible. Schist has a patch cycle of 29. Schist is not versioned.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is versioned, that build is tested. Item B. When the build is not tested, that build is flaky. Item C. When the build is flaky, that build is not reverted. Item D. When the build has a patch cycle of more than 18, that build is not tested. Item E. When the build is versioned, that build has no security advisory. Item F. When the build is versioned, that build has a security advisory. Item G. When the build is compiled, that build is not obsolete. Item H. When the build is flaky, that build is reverted. Item A is suspended when the build is reproducible. Item C is suspended when the build has a test yield of no more than 56. Item H is suspended when the build has a test yield of more than 56. Item G is suspended when the build is versioned. Item D outranks Item A. Item H outranks Item C. Item E outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Schist is reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014401", "pair_id": "u014401-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014401-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "69c9e6514deb7582", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014465-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is not stateless. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 76. Halcyon is not provisioned. Halcyon is isolated.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload has a failover node and has a memory allotment of at most 69, then it is replicated. (2) If a workload is not cached, then it has a failover node. (3) If a workload is provisioned, then it is encrypted. (4) If a workload is isolated, then it is cached. (5) If a workload has a failover node and has a memory allotment above 69 and is isolated, then it is not replicated. (5) is void if the workload is stateless. When (1) and (5) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Halcyon is replicated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014465", "pair_id": "u014465-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014465-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "993d585bf634485c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u014465-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is not stateless. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 76. Halcyon is not provisioned. Halcyon is isolated.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload has a failover node and has a memory allotment of at most 69, then it is replicated. (2) If a workload is cached, then it has a failover node. (3) If a workload is provisioned, then it is encrypted. (4) If a workload is isolated, then it is cached. (5) If a workload has a failover node and has a memory allotment above 69 and is isolated, then it is not replicated. (5) is void if the workload is stateless. When (1) and (5) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Halcyon is replicated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014465", "pair_id": "u014465-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014465-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4857eb9df0f70f17", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u014513-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is not notarized. Talc is signed. Talc has a security advisory. Talc is minified.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has no security advisory, that build is not documented. Item B. When the build is flaky, that build is documented. Item C. When the build is documented, that build has no migration script. Item D. When the build is not notarized, that build is flaky. Item E. When the build is minified, that build is benchmarked. Item F. When the build is documented, that build has a migration script. Item C is suspended when the build is signed. Item D is suspended when the build is not backported. Item F is suspended when the build is not signed. Item C outranks Item F. Item A outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Talc has a migration script?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014513", "pair_id": "u014513-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014513-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7f110c55ad8fdd38", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014513-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is not notarized. Talc is not signed. Talc has a security advisory. Talc is minified.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has no security advisory, that build is not documented. Item B. When the build is flaky, that build is documented. Item C. When the build is documented, that build has no migration script. Item D. When the build is not notarized, that build is flaky. Item E. When the build is minified, that build is benchmarked. Item F. When the build is documented, that build has a migration script. Item C is suspended when the build is signed. Item D is suspended when the build is not backported. Item F is suspended when the build is not signed. Item C outranks Item F. Item A outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Talc has a migration script?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014513", "pair_id": "u014513-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014513-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "801494ee409b5505", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014584-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has a team size of 27. Capella has a review mark of 9. Capella is exploratory.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it has a steering committee. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has a team size higher than 51: then it is a pilot study. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it has no steering committee. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is exploratory: then it is cofunded. Policy III is waived if that proposal has a postdoc. Policy I is waived if that proposal has a review mark higher than 88. Policy IV is waived if that proposal has a review mark no lower than 9. Policy I is waived if that proposal has a review mark smaller than 11. Policy III is waived if that proposal has a review mark no lower than 11. Question: Is it so that Capella has a steering committee?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014584", "pair_id": "u014584-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014584-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0b148cc50d97d127", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u014584-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has a team size of 27. Capella has a review mark of 9. Capella is exploratory.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it has a steering committee. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has a team size higher than 51: then it is a pilot study. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it has no steering committee. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is exploratory: then it is cofunded. Policy III is waived if that proposal has a postdoc. Policy I is waived if that proposal has a review mark higher than 88. Policy IV is waived if that proposal has a review mark no lower than 45. Policy I is waived if that proposal has a review mark smaller than 11. Policy III is waived if that proposal has a review mark no lower than 11. Question: Is it so that Capella has a steering committee?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014584", "pair_id": "u014584-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014584-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1235ed044a1f54ae", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u014606-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo has no visa. Mads is not licensed. Ivo is not relocating. Sigrid is not licensed. Sigrid has a notice period of 32. Ivo has a notice period of 53. Mads is not relocating.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is not relocating, it thereby is not eligible. Point B. If said candidate is not relocating, it thereby is eligible. Point C. If said candidate is licensed, it thereby has a diploma. Point B is cancelled if said candidate has a visa. Point B is cancelled if said candidate has a notice period short of 51. Point A is cancelled if said candidate has a notice period of minimum 51. Point B is cancelled if said candidate has a visa. Point A supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Ivo is eligible. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014606", "pair_id": "u014606-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014606-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4ca0ec0eaa09d59d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u014606-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo has no visa. Ivo is licensed. Mads is not licensed. Ivo is not relocating. Sigrid is not licensed. Sigrid has a notice period of 32. Ivo has a notice period of 53. Mads is not relocating.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is not relocating, it thereby is not eligible. Point B. If said candidate is not relocating, it thereby is eligible. Point C. If said candidate is licensed, it thereby has a diploma. Point B is cancelled if said candidate has a visa. Point B is cancelled if said candidate has a notice period short of 51. Point A is cancelled if said candidate has a notice period of minimum 51. Point B is cancelled if said candidate has a visa. Point A supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Ivo is eligible. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014606", "pair_id": "u014606-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014606-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "df3b2db62e8e56d3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u014618-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bastien is creditworthy. Greta is not solvent. Folke is not pensioned. Greta has no guarantor. Folke has no guarantor. Folke has a repayment grade of 42. Greta has a credit rating of 8. Greta is not creditworthy. Bastien is pensioned. Greta is not amortized. Greta has a repayment grade of 26. Bastien is not amortized. Greta is not pensioned.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is creditworthy, thus it is employed. Provision 2: when the borrower here is pensioned, thus it is not foreclosed. Provision 3: when the borrower here is solvent, thus it is indebted. Provision 4: when the borrower here has a guarantor, thus it is vetted. Provision 5: when the borrower here is amortized, thus it is not a depositor. Provision 6: when the borrower here has a credit rating beyond 31, thus it is a depositor. Provision 7: when the borrower here is pensioned, thus it has collateral. Provision 8: when the borrower here has a repayment grade beneath 26, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 9: when the borrower here has a credit rating at or below 31, thus it is underwritten. Provision 10: when the borrower here has a repayment grade at or below 53, thus it is not indebted. Provision 11: when the borrower here is amortized, thus it has a mortgage. Provision 12: when the borrower here is creditworthy, thus it is not vetted. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 12 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 10. Question: Which one describes Greta?", "options": ["is employed", "is vetted", "is foreclosed", "is a depositor", "has collateral", "has a mortgage", "is underwritten"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is underwritten", "unit_id": "u014618", "pair_id": "u014618-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014618-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9837e7969fb9e442", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a6", "a2", "a9", "a10", "a11", "a7", "a4"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u014618-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bastien is creditworthy. Greta is not solvent. Folke is not pensioned. Greta has no guarantor. Folke has no guarantor. Folke has a repayment grade of 42. Greta has a credit rating of 8. Greta is not creditworthy. Bastien is pensioned. Greta is not amortized. Greta has a repayment grade of 60. Bastien is not amortized. Greta is not pensioned.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is creditworthy, thus it is employed. Provision 2: when the borrower here is pensioned, thus it is not foreclosed. Provision 3: when the borrower here is solvent, thus it is indebted. Provision 4: when the borrower here has a guarantor, thus it is vetted. Provision 5: when the borrower here is amortized, thus it is not a depositor. Provision 6: when the borrower here has a credit rating beyond 31, thus it is a depositor. Provision 7: when the borrower here is pensioned, thus it has collateral. Provision 8: when the borrower here has a repayment grade beneath 26, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 9: when the borrower here has a credit rating at or below 31, thus it is underwritten. Provision 10: when the borrower here has a repayment grade at or below 53, thus it is not indebted. Provision 11: when the borrower here is amortized, thus it has a mortgage. Provision 12: when the borrower here is creditworthy, thus it is not vetted. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 12 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 10. Question: Which one describes Greta?", "options": ["is employed", "is vetted", "is foreclosed", "is a depositor", "has collateral", "has a mortgage", "is underwritten"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is underwritten", "unit_id": "u014618", "pair_id": "u014618-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014618-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2c86b5de4049022b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a6", "a2", "a9", "a10", "a11", "a7", "a4"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u014618-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bastien is creditworthy. Greta is not solvent. Folke is not pensioned. Greta has no guarantor. Folke has no guarantor. Folke has a repayment grade of 42. Greta has a credit rating of 8. Greta is not creditworthy. Bastien is pensioned. Greta is not amortized. Greta has a repayment grade of 26. Bastien is not amortized. Greta is not pensioned.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is employed. Point B. If said borrower is pensioned, it thereby is not foreclosed. Point C. If said borrower is solvent, it thereby is indebted. Point D. If said borrower has a guarantor, it thereby is vetted. Point E. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby is not a depositor. Point F. If said borrower has a credit rating in excess of 31, it thereby is a depositor. Point G. If said borrower is pensioned, it thereby has collateral. Point H. If said borrower has a repayment grade short of 26, it thereby is foreclosed. Point I. If said borrower has a credit rating of maximum 31, it thereby is underwritten. Point J. If said borrower has a repayment grade of maximum 53, it thereby is not indebted. Point K. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby has a mortgage. Point L. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is not vetted. Point B supersedes Point H. Point L supersedes Point D. Point F supersedes Point E. Point C supersedes Point J. Question: Which choice is true for Greta?", "options": ["is employed", "is vetted", "is foreclosed", "is a depositor", "has collateral", "has a mortgage", "is underwritten"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is underwritten", "unit_id": "u014618", "pair_id": "u014618-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014618-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9837e7969fb9e442", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a6", "a2", "a9", "a10", "a11", "a7", "a4"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u014618-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bastien is creditworthy. Greta is not solvent. Folke is not pensioned. Greta has no guarantor. Folke has no guarantor. Folke has a repayment grade of 42. Greta has a credit rating of 8. Greta is not creditworthy. Bastien is pensioned. Greta is not amortized. Greta has a repayment grade of 60. Bastien is not amortized. Greta is not pensioned.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is employed. Point B. If said borrower is pensioned, it thereby is not foreclosed. Point C. If said borrower is solvent, it thereby is indebted. Point D. If said borrower has a guarantor, it thereby is vetted. Point E. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby is not a depositor. Point F. If said borrower has a credit rating in excess of 31, it thereby is a depositor. Point G. If said borrower is pensioned, it thereby has collateral. Point H. If said borrower has a repayment grade short of 26, it thereby is foreclosed. Point I. If said borrower has a credit rating of maximum 31, it thereby is underwritten. Point J. If said borrower has a repayment grade of maximum 53, it thereby is not indebted. Point K. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby has a mortgage. Point L. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is not vetted. Point B supersedes Point H. Point L supersedes Point D. Point F supersedes Point E. Point C supersedes Point J. Question: Which choice is true for Greta?", "options": ["is employed", "is vetted", "is foreclosed", "is a depositor", "has collateral", "has a mortgage", "is underwritten"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is underwritten", "unit_id": "u014618", "pair_id": "u014618-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014618-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2c86b5de4049022b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a6", "a2", "a9", "a10", "a11", "a7", "a4"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u014618-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bastien is creditworthy. Greta is not solvent. Folke is not pensioned. Greta has no guarantor. Folke has no guarantor. Folke has a repayment grade of 42. Greta has a credit rating of 8. Greta is not creditworthy. Bastien is pensioned. Greta is not amortized. Greta has a repayment grade of 26. Bastien is not amortized. Greta is not pensioned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is creditworthy, so it is employed. No. 2 While the given borrower is pensioned, so it is not foreclosed. No. 3 While the given borrower is solvent, so it is indebted. No. 4 While the given borrower has a guarantor, so it is vetted. No. 5 While the given borrower is amortized, so it is not a depositor. No. 6 While the given borrower has a credit rating that exceeds 31, so it is a depositor. No. 7 While the given borrower is pensioned, so it has collateral. No. 8 While the given borrower has a repayment grade that falls below 26, so it is foreclosed. No. 9 While the given borrower has a credit rating not above 31, so it is underwritten. No. 10 While the given borrower has a repayment grade not above 53, so it is not indebted. No. 11 While the given borrower is amortized, so it has a mortgage. No. 12 While the given borrower is creditworthy, so it is not vetted. No. 2 wins over No. 8. No. 12 wins over No. 4. No. 6 wins over No. 5. No. 3 wins over No. 10. Question: Select what holds for Greta: which option?", "options": ["is employed", "is vetted", "is foreclosed", "is a depositor", "has collateral", "has a mortgage", "is underwritten"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is underwritten", "unit_id": "u014618", "pair_id": "u014618-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014618-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9837e7969fb9e442", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a6", "a2", "a9", "a10", "a11", "a7", "a4"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u014618-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bastien is creditworthy. Greta is not solvent. Folke is not pensioned. Greta has no guarantor. Folke has no guarantor. Folke has a repayment grade of 42. Greta has a credit rating of 8. Greta is not creditworthy. Bastien is pensioned. Greta is not amortized. Greta has a repayment grade of 60. Bastien is not amortized. Greta is not pensioned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is creditworthy, so it is employed. No. 2 While the given borrower is pensioned, so it is not foreclosed. No. 3 While the given borrower is solvent, so it is indebted. No. 4 While the given borrower has a guarantor, so it is vetted. No. 5 While the given borrower is amortized, so it is not a depositor. No. 6 While the given borrower has a credit rating that exceeds 31, so it is a depositor. No. 7 While the given borrower is pensioned, so it has collateral. No. 8 While the given borrower has a repayment grade that falls below 26, so it is foreclosed. No. 9 While the given borrower has a credit rating not above 31, so it is underwritten. No. 10 While the given borrower has a repayment grade not above 53, so it is not indebted. No. 11 While the given borrower is amortized, so it has a mortgage. No. 12 While the given borrower is creditworthy, so it is not vetted. No. 2 wins over No. 8. No. 12 wins over No. 4. No. 6 wins over No. 5. No. 3 wins over No. 10. Question: Select what holds for Greta: which option?", "options": ["is employed", "is vetted", "is foreclosed", "is a depositor", "has collateral", "has a mortgage", "is underwritten"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is underwritten", "unit_id": "u014618", "pair_id": "u014618-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014618-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2c86b5de4049022b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a6", "a2", "a9", "a10", "a11", "a7", "a4"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u014628-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk is not underwritten. Tomas is underwritten. Anouk is not creditworthy. Tomas has no lien. Evren is creditworthy. Bastien is creditworthy. Bastien is not underwritten. Tomas is creditworthy. Tomas is indebted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is underwritten: then it is vetted. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has no lien: then it is amortized. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is underwritten: then it is not vetted. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a lien: then it is a homeowner. Policy III is waived if that borrower is creditworthy. Policy I is waived if that borrower is not creditworthy. Policy IV is waived if that borrower is not indebted. Policy II is waived if that borrower is creditworthy. Question: Is it so that Tomas is vetted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014628", "pair_id": "u014628-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014628-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7aa01c45e848de7a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u014628-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk is not underwritten. Tomas is underwritten. Anouk is not creditworthy. Tomas has no lien. Evren is creditworthy. Bastien is creditworthy. Bastien is not underwritten. Tomas is creditworthy. Tomas is indebted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is underwritten: then it is vetted. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has no lien: then it is amortized. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is underwritten: then it is not vetted. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a lien: then it is a homeowner. Policy III is waived if that borrower is creditworthy. Policy I is waived if that borrower is indebted. Policy I is waived if that borrower is not creditworthy. Policy IV is waived if that borrower is not indebted. Policy II is waived if that borrower is creditworthy. Question: Is it so that Tomas is vetted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014628", "pair_id": "u014628-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014628-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c079f63e672b7592", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u014634-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus is damaged. Rasmus is not stamped. Rasmus is palletized. Rasmus is oversized. Rasmus is labeled. Rasmus is delayed. Rasmus is perishable.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is tracked provided that it is palletized as well as is delayed as well as is oversized. Section 2: a parcel is rerouted provided that it is palletized as well as is prepaid as well as is damaged. Section 3: a parcel is refrigerated provided that it is stamped. Section 4: a parcel has a waybill provided that it is palletized as well as is damaged as well as is delayed. Section 5: a parcel is fragile provided that it has a waybill as well as is scanned. Section 6: a parcel is misrouted provided that it is labeled as well as is perishable. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it is damaged. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it is delayed. Question: Which statement fits Rasmus?", "options": ["is rerouted", "has a waybill", "is tracked"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a waybill", "unit_id": "u014634", "pair_id": "u014634-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014634-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a2fe729049c3a4c7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014634-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus is damaged. Rasmus is not stamped. Rasmus is palletized. Rasmus is oversized. Rasmus is labeled. Rasmus is delayed. Rasmus is not perishable.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is tracked provided that it is palletized as well as is delayed as well as is oversized. Section 2: a parcel is rerouted provided that it is palletized as well as is prepaid as well as is damaged. Section 3: a parcel is refrigerated provided that it is stamped. Section 4: a parcel has a waybill provided that it is palletized as well as is damaged as well as is delayed. Section 5: a parcel is fragile provided that it has a waybill as well as is scanned. Section 6: a parcel is misrouted provided that it is labeled as well as is perishable. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it is damaged. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it is delayed. Question: Which statement fits Rasmus?", "options": ["is rerouted", "has a waybill", "is tracked"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a waybill", "unit_id": "u014634", "pair_id": "u014634-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014634-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "45a991b0b148d8fb", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014634-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus is damaged. Rasmus is not stamped. Rasmus is palletized. Rasmus is oversized. Rasmus is labeled. Rasmus is delayed. Rasmus is perishable.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is palletized and additionally is delayed and additionally is oversized, it then is tracked. #2 Each time a parcel is palletized and additionally is prepaid and additionally is damaged, it then is rerouted. #3 Each time a parcel is stamped, it then is refrigerated. #4 Each time a parcel is palletized and additionally is damaged and additionally is delayed, it then has a waybill. #5 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally is scanned, it then is fragile. #6 Each time a parcel is labeled and additionally is perishable, it then is misrouted. #1 is set aside if a parcel is damaged. #3 is set aside if a parcel is delayed. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Rasmus?", "options": ["is rerouted", "has a waybill", "is tracked"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a waybill", "unit_id": "u014634", "pair_id": "u014634-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014634-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a2fe729049c3a4c7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014634-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus is damaged. Rasmus is not stamped. Rasmus is palletized. Rasmus is oversized. Rasmus is labeled. Rasmus is delayed. Rasmus is not perishable.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is palletized and additionally is delayed and additionally is oversized, it then is tracked. #2 Each time a parcel is palletized and additionally is prepaid and additionally is damaged, it then is rerouted. #3 Each time a parcel is stamped, it then is refrigerated. #4 Each time a parcel is palletized and additionally is damaged and additionally is delayed, it then has a waybill. #5 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally is scanned, it then is fragile. #6 Each time a parcel is labeled and additionally is perishable, it then is misrouted. #1 is set aside if a parcel is damaged. #3 is set aside if a parcel is delayed. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Rasmus?", "options": ["is rerouted", "has a waybill", "is tracked"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a waybill", "unit_id": "u014634", "pair_id": "u014634-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014634-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "45a991b0b148d8fb", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014641-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica has a changelog. Mica has a lint backlog of 42. Mica has no migration script. Mica has a defect tally of 4. Mica has a patch cycle of 5.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is signed plus has a lint backlog higher than 17 plus has a changelog: then it is not experimental. Policy II. Suppose that build has a patch cycle no higher than 12: then it has no security advisory. Policy III. Suppose that build is signed plus has a lint backlog no higher than 17: then it is experimental. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is reproducible. Policy V. Suppose that build has a migration script plus has a changelog: then it is linted. Policy VI. Suppose that build is reproducible plus has a defect tally smaller than 34: then it is signed. Policy VI is waived if that build has a changelog plus is benchmarked. Question: Is it so that Mica is experimental?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014641", "pair_id": "u014641-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014641-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bffeb4a583977f32", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014641-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica has a changelog. Mica has a lint backlog of 8. Mica has no migration script. Mica has a defect tally of 4. Mica has a patch cycle of 5.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is signed plus has a lint backlog higher than 17 plus has a changelog: then it is not experimental. Policy II. Suppose that build has a patch cycle no higher than 12: then it has no security advisory. Policy III. Suppose that build is signed plus has a lint backlog no higher than 17: then it is experimental. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is reproducible. Policy V. Suppose that build has a migration script plus has a changelog: then it is linted. Policy VI. Suppose that build is reproducible plus has a defect tally smaller than 34: then it is signed. Policy VI is waived if that build has a changelog plus is benchmarked. Question: Is it so that Mica is experimental?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014641", "pair_id": "u014641-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014641-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "231ca50ad978065f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014641-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica has a changelog. Mica has a lint backlog of 42. Mica has no migration script. Mica has a defect tally of 4. Mica has a patch cycle of 5.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is signed and additionally has a lint backlog greater than 17 and additionally has a changelog, it then is not experimental. #2 Each time a build has a patch cycle of 12 or below, it then has no security advisory. #3 Each time a build is signed and additionally has a lint backlog of 17 or below, it then is experimental. #4 Each time a build has a changelog, it then is reproducible. #5 Each time a build has a migration script and additionally has a changelog, it then is linted. #6 Each time a build is reproducible and additionally has a defect tally less than 34, it then is signed. #6 is set aside if a build has a changelog and additionally is benchmarked. Question: Do the terms above show that Mica is experimental?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014641", "pair_id": "u014641-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014641-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bffeb4a583977f32", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014641-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica has a changelog. Mica has a lint backlog of 8. Mica has no migration script. Mica has a defect tally of 4. Mica has a patch cycle of 5.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is signed and additionally has a lint backlog greater than 17 and additionally has a changelog, it then is not experimental. #2 Each time a build has a patch cycle of 12 or below, it then has no security advisory. #3 Each time a build is signed and additionally has a lint backlog of 17 or below, it then is experimental. #4 Each time a build has a changelog, it then is reproducible. #5 Each time a build has a migration script and additionally has a changelog, it then is linted. #6 Each time a build is reproducible and additionally has a defect tally less than 34, it then is signed. #6 is set aside if a build has a changelog and additionally is benchmarked. Question: Do the terms above show that Mica is experimental?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014641", "pair_id": "u014641-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014641-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "231ca50ad978065f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014649-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hedda has a commute radius of 9. Hedda is seasoned. Sigrid has a notice period of 79. Jasna is not seasoned. Petra has a notice period of 94. Sigrid is not seasoned. Jasna has a notice period of 15. Petra has an aptitude quotient of 82. Petra is seasoned. Petra has a commute radius of 72. Jasna has no mentor. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 52. Sigrid has no mentor.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is interviewed provided that it is freelance. Section 2: a candidate has no background screening provided that it is freelance. Section 3: a candidate is freelance provided that it has a commute radius exceeding 47. Section 4: a candidate has a background screening provided that it is freelance. Section 5: a candidate is unionized provided that it is seasoned. Section 6: a candidate is a graduate provided that it has an aptitude quotient exceeding 86. Section 2 lapses for a candidate if it has a notice period of 75 or lower. Section 2 lapses for a candidate if it has an aptitude quotient of 37 or lower. Section 4 lapses for a candidate if it has a notice period exceeding 75. Section 3 lapses for a candidate if it has a mentor. Question: Petra has a background screening. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014649", "pair_id": "u014649-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014649-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "58f42a803ffecbb2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u014649-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hedda has a commute radius of 9. Hedda is seasoned. Sigrid has a notice period of 79. Jasna is not seasoned. Petra has a notice period of 94. Petra has a mentor. Sigrid is not seasoned. Jasna has a notice period of 15. Petra has an aptitude quotient of 82. Petra is seasoned. Petra has a commute radius of 72. Jasna has no mentor. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 52. Sigrid has no mentor.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is interviewed provided that it is freelance. Section 2: a candidate has no background screening provided that it is freelance. Section 3: a candidate is freelance provided that it has a commute radius exceeding 47. Section 4: a candidate has a background screening provided that it is freelance. Section 5: a candidate is unionized provided that it is seasoned. Section 6: a candidate is a graduate provided that it has an aptitude quotient exceeding 86. Section 2 lapses for a candidate if it has a notice period of 75 or lower. Section 2 lapses for a candidate if it has an aptitude quotient of 37 or lower. Section 4 lapses for a candidate if it has a notice period exceeding 75. Section 3 lapses for a candidate if it has a mentor. Question: Petra has a background screening. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014649", "pair_id": "u014649-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014649-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e377e622a0f81643", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u014649-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hedda has a commute radius of 9. Hedda is seasoned. Sigrid has a notice period of 79. Jasna is not seasoned. Petra has a notice period of 94. Sigrid is not seasoned. Jasna has a notice period of 15. Petra has an aptitude quotient of 82. Petra is seasoned. Petra has a commute radius of 72. Jasna has no mentor. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 52. Sigrid has no mentor.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is freelance: then it is interviewed. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is freelance: then it has no background screening. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a commute radius higher than 47: then it is freelance. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is freelance: then it has a background screening. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is seasoned: then it is unionized. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate has an aptitude quotient higher than 86: then it is a graduate. Policy II is waived if that candidate has a notice period no higher than 75. Policy II is waived if that candidate has an aptitude quotient no higher than 37. Policy IV is waived if that candidate has a notice period higher than 75. Policy III is waived if that candidate has a mentor. Question: Is it so that Petra has a background screening?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014649", "pair_id": "u014649-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014649-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "58f42a803ffecbb2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u014649-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hedda has a commute radius of 9. Hedda is seasoned. Sigrid has a notice period of 79. Jasna is not seasoned. Petra has a notice period of 94. Petra has a mentor. Sigrid is not seasoned. Jasna has a notice period of 15. Petra has an aptitude quotient of 82. Petra is seasoned. Petra has a commute radius of 72. Jasna has no mentor. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 52. Sigrid has no mentor.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is freelance: then it is interviewed. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is freelance: then it has no background screening. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a commute radius higher than 47: then it is freelance. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is freelance: then it has a background screening. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is seasoned: then it is unionized. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate has an aptitude quotient higher than 86: then it is a graduate. Policy II is waived if that candidate has a notice period no higher than 75. Policy II is waived if that candidate has an aptitude quotient no higher than 37. Policy IV is waived if that candidate has a notice period higher than 75. Policy III is waived if that candidate has a mentor. Question: Is it so that Petra has a background screening?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014649", "pair_id": "u014649-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014649-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e377e622a0f81643", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u014689-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is preregistered. Deneb has a team size of 13. Deneb is cofunded.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a team size below 37, then it is not shortlisted. (2) If a proposal has a team size above 19, then it is longitudinal. (3) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is budgeted. (4) If a proposal is not preregistered, then it is not longitudinal. When (2) and (4) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Deneb is longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014689", "pair_id": "u014689-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014689-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4b82e43aaa401892", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u014689-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is not preregistered. Izar is preregistered. Deneb has a team size of 13. Deneb is cofunded.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a team size below 37, then it is not shortlisted. (2) If a proposal has a team size above 19, then it is longitudinal. (3) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is budgeted. (4) If a proposal is not preregistered, then it is not longitudinal. When (2) and (4) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Deneb is longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014689", "pair_id": "u014689-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014689-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9aef49c26a07028e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u014689-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is preregistered. Deneb has a team size of 13. Deneb is cofunded.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has a team size under 37, it also is not shortlisted. Clause 2: once any proposal has a team size over 19, it also is longitudinal. Clause 3: once any proposal is cofunded, it also is budgeted. Clause 4: once any proposal is not preregistered, it also is not longitudinal. Clause 2 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Deneb is longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014689", "pair_id": "u014689-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014689-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4b82e43aaa401892", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u014689-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is not preregistered. Izar is preregistered. Deneb has a team size of 13. Deneb is cofunded.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has a team size under 37, it also is not shortlisted. Clause 2: once any proposal has a team size over 19, it also is longitudinal. Clause 3: once any proposal is cofunded, it also is budgeted. Clause 4: once any proposal is not preregistered, it also is not longitudinal. Clause 2 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Deneb is longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014689", "pair_id": "u014689-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014689-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9aef49c26a07028e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u014719-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is not bankrupt. Ingrid is garnished. Tomas is not bankrupt. Ingrid has no cosigner. Tomas has no escrow account. Tomas is garnished. Dagny is bankrupt. Greta is audited. Dagny is not audited. Greta is garnished. Greta has no cosigner.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is audited: then it is delinquent. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is foreclosed: then it is not amortized. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner: then it is foreclosed. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has no cosigner: then it is not solvent. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is foreclosed: then it is pensioned. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is not a homeowner. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is delinquent: then it is solvent. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower is solvent: then it is amortized. Policy IX. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt: then it is a depositor. Policy X. Suppose that borrower is garnished: then it is not delinquent. Policy XI. Suppose that borrower has a cosigner: then it is not pensioned. Policy XII. Suppose that borrower is delinquent: then it has no mortgage. Policy XIII. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is a homeowner. In a clash, Policy XIII beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy XI beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Greta is amortized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014719", "pair_id": "u014719-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014719-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "266795d694ad5054", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014719-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is not bankrupt. Ingrid is garnished. Tomas is not bankrupt. Ingrid has no cosigner. Tomas has no escrow account. Tomas is garnished. Dagny is bankrupt. Greta is audited. Dagny is not audited. Greta is garnished. Greta has no cosigner.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is audited: then it is delinquent. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is foreclosed: then it is not amortized. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner: then it is foreclosed. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a cosigner: then it is not solvent. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is foreclosed: then it is pensioned. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is not a homeowner. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is delinquent: then it is solvent. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower is solvent: then it is amortized. Policy IX. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt: then it is a depositor. Policy X. Suppose that borrower is garnished: then it is not delinquent. Policy XI. Suppose that borrower has a cosigner: then it is not pensioned. Policy XII. Suppose that borrower is delinquent: then it has no mortgage. Policy XIII. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is a homeowner. In a clash, Policy XIII beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy XI beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Greta is amortized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014719", "pair_id": "u014719-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014719-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "acfe3404a10af0d9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014719-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is not bankrupt. Ingrid is garnished. Tomas is not bankrupt. Ingrid has no cosigner. Tomas has no escrow account. Tomas is garnished. Dagny is bankrupt. Greta is audited. Dagny is not audited. Greta is garnished. Greta has no cosigner.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is audited, it then is delinquent. #2 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then is not amortized. #3 Each time a borrower is a homeowner, it then is foreclosed. #4 Each time a borrower has no cosigner, it then is not solvent. #5 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then is pensioned. #6 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then is not a homeowner. #7 Each time a borrower is delinquent, it then is solvent. #8 Each time a borrower is solvent, it then is amortized. #9 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then is a depositor. #10 Each time a borrower is garnished, it then is not delinquent. #11 Each time a borrower has a cosigner, it then is not pensioned. #12 Each time a borrower is delinquent, it then has no mortgage. #13 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then is a homeowner. #6 yields to #13. #2 yields to #8. #5 yields to #11. #4 yields to #7. #1 yields to #10. Question: Do the terms above show that Greta is amortized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014719", "pair_id": "u014719-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014719-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "266795d694ad5054", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014719-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is not bankrupt. Ingrid is garnished. Tomas is not bankrupt. Ingrid has no cosigner. Tomas has no escrow account. Tomas is garnished. Dagny is bankrupt. Greta is audited. Dagny is not audited. Greta is garnished. Greta has no cosigner.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is audited, it then is delinquent. #2 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then is not amortized. #3 Each time a borrower is a homeowner, it then is foreclosed. #4 Each time a borrower has a cosigner, it then is not solvent. #5 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then is pensioned. #6 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then is not a homeowner. #7 Each time a borrower is delinquent, it then is solvent. #8 Each time a borrower is solvent, it then is amortized. #9 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then is a depositor. #10 Each time a borrower is garnished, it then is not delinquent. #11 Each time a borrower has a cosigner, it then is not pensioned. #12 Each time a borrower is delinquent, it then has no mortgage. #13 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then is a homeowner. #6 yields to #13. #2 yields to #8. #5 yields to #11. #4 yields to #7. #1 yields to #10. Question: Do the terms above show that Greta is amortized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014719", "pair_id": "u014719-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014719-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "acfe3404a10af0d9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014722-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery has no failover node. Kestrel is not monitored. Orrery has a memory allotment of 25. Sierra has a failover node.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is monitored, it also is not containerized. Clause 2: once any workload is containerized, it also is not virtualized. Clause 3: once any workload is monitored, it also has no GPU. Clause 4: once any workload has a GPU, it also is containerized. Clause 5: once any workload has a memory allotment over 16, it also has a GPU. Clause 6: once any workload is containerized, it also is virtualized. Clause 7: once any workload has no failover node, it also has a snapshot. Clause 1 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a memory allotment under 14. Clause 7 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a memory allotment over 20. Clause 6 does not hold for a workload when any workload is monitored. Clause 2 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not monitored. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Clause 4 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Orrery is virtualized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014722", "pair_id": "u014722-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014722-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "98a105551576e0ac", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014722-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery has no failover node. Kestrel is not monitored. Orrery has a memory allotment of 25. Sierra has a failover node.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is monitored, it also is not containerized. Clause 2: once any workload is containerized, it also is not virtualized. Clause 3: once any workload is monitored, it also has no GPU. Clause 4: once any workload has a GPU, it also is containerized. Clause 5: once any workload has a memory allotment over 16, it also has a GPU. Clause 6: once any workload is containerized, it also is virtualized. Clause 7: once any workload has no failover node, it also has a snapshot. Clause 1 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a memory allotment under 14. Clause 7 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a memory allotment over 41. Clause 6 does not hold for a workload when any workload is monitored. Clause 2 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not monitored. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Clause 4 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Orrery is virtualized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014722", "pair_id": "u014722-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014722-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ee0816bee9adec72", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014753-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf has a fever reading of 65. Xenia has no chaperone. Yusuf is admitted. Xenia is rescheduled. Gunnar has a fever reading of 6. Florin has a pulse rate of 62. Gunnar is not admitted. Yusuf is rescheduled. Xenia has a fever reading of 10. Xenia has no interpreter. Xenia is not admitted. Gunnar has a chaperone. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 90. Gunnar has an interpreter. Yusuf has no interpreter. Yusuf has no chaperone. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 5. Florin is rescheduled.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is hypertensive, and has a fever reading of less than 14, that patient is not postoperative. Item B. When the patient has a fever reading of no less than 84, that patient is not anemic. Item C. When the patient is hypertensive, and has a fever reading of no less than 14, and is rescheduled, that patient is postoperative. Item D. When the patient has a mobility rank of more than 75, that patient is not discharged. Item E. When the patient has a chaperone, that patient is hypertensive. Item F. When the patient has a pulse rate of no less than 88, and has a fever reading of no less than 81, and has a pain level of no more than 42, that patient is not hypertensive. Item G. When the patient has an interpreter, that patient is triaged. Item H. When the patient is postoperative, and is admitted, that patient is discharged. Item I. When the patient has a fever reading of more than 67, and has a pain level of less than 55, and has a chaperone, that patient is anemic. Item I outranks Item B. Item H outranks Item D. Item E outranks Item F. Item C outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Gunnar is not postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014753", "pair_id": "u014753-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014753-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3d35fd2b1313c7b4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u014753-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf has a fever reading of 65. Xenia has no chaperone. Yusuf is admitted. Xenia is rescheduled. Gunnar has a fever reading of 73. Florin has a pulse rate of 62. Gunnar is not admitted. Yusuf is rescheduled. Xenia has a fever reading of 10. Xenia has no interpreter. Xenia is not admitted. Gunnar has a chaperone. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 90. Gunnar has an interpreter. Yusuf has no interpreter. Yusuf has no chaperone. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 5. Florin is rescheduled.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is hypertensive, and has a fever reading of less than 14, that patient is not postoperative. Item B. When the patient has a fever reading of no less than 84, that patient is not anemic. Item C. When the patient is hypertensive, and has a fever reading of no less than 14, and is rescheduled, that patient is postoperative. Item D. When the patient has a mobility rank of more than 75, that patient is not discharged. Item E. When the patient has a chaperone, that patient is hypertensive. Item F. When the patient has a pulse rate of no less than 88, and has a fever reading of no less than 81, and has a pain level of no more than 42, that patient is not hypertensive. Item G. When the patient has an interpreter, that patient is triaged. Item H. When the patient is postoperative, and is admitted, that patient is discharged. Item I. When the patient has a fever reading of more than 67, and has a pain level of less than 55, and has a chaperone, that patient is anemic. Item I outranks Item B. Item H outranks Item D. Item E outranks Item F. Item C outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Gunnar is not postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014753", "pair_id": "u014753-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014753-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "457c87db174453f4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u014792-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is symptomatic. Cosima is not ambulatory. Elif is not symptomatic. Cosima is not hypertensive. Elif is triaged. Cosima is not triaged. Elif is not anemic. Cosima is symptomatic. Dorian is not hypertensive. Cosima is not anemic.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is anemic, then it has no caregiver. (2) If a patient is triaged, then it has a caregiver. (3) If a patient is rescheduled, then it is not diabetic. (4) If a patient is not ambulatory, then it is rescheduled. (5) If a patient is rescheduled, then it is diabetic. (6) If a patient is symptomatic, then it has no pacemaker. (7) If a patient is hypertensive, then it has a pacemaker. (4) is void if the patient is hypertensive. (3) is void if the patient is allergic. (5) is void if the patient is anemic. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. When (6) and (7) clash, (6) prevails. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Cosima is not diabetic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014792", "pair_id": "u014792-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014792-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "af384a799b79e41d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u014792-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is symptomatic. Cosima is not ambulatory. Elif is not symptomatic. Cosima is not hypertensive. Elif is triaged. Cosima is not triaged. Elif is not anemic. Cosima is symptomatic. Dorian is not hypertensive. Cosima is not anemic.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is anemic, then it has no caregiver. (2) If a patient is triaged, then it has a caregiver. (3) If a patient is rescheduled, then it is not diabetic. (4) If a patient is ambulatory, then it is rescheduled. (5) If a patient is rescheduled, then it is diabetic. (6) If a patient is symptomatic, then it has no pacemaker. (7) If a patient is hypertensive, then it has a pacemaker. (4) is void if the patient is hypertensive. (3) is void if the patient is allergic. (5) is void if the patient is anemic. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. When (6) and (7) clash, (6) prevails. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Cosima is not diabetic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014792", "pair_id": "u014792-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014792-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7379d134a40d3ed7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u014792-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is symptomatic. Cosima is not ambulatory. Elif is not symptomatic. Cosima is not hypertensive. Elif is triaged. Cosima is not triaged. Elif is not anemic. Cosima is symptomatic. Dorian is not hypertensive. Cosima is not anemic.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is anemic, that patient has no caregiver. Item B. When the patient is triaged, that patient has a caregiver. Item C. When the patient is rescheduled, that patient is not diabetic. Item D. When the patient is not ambulatory, that patient is rescheduled. Item E. When the patient is rescheduled, that patient is diabetic. Item F. When the patient is symptomatic, that patient has no pacemaker. Item G. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient has a pacemaker. Item D is suspended when the patient is hypertensive. Item C is suspended when the patient is allergic. Item E is suspended when the patient is anemic. Item B outranks Item A. Item F outranks Item G. Item C outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Cosima is not diabetic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014792", "pair_id": "u014792-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014792-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "af384a799b79e41d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u014792-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is symptomatic. Cosima is not ambulatory. Elif is not symptomatic. Cosima is not hypertensive. Elif is triaged. Cosima is not triaged. Elif is not anemic. Cosima is symptomatic. Dorian is not hypertensive. Cosima is not anemic.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is anemic, that patient has no caregiver. Item B. When the patient is triaged, that patient has a caregiver. Item C. When the patient is rescheduled, that patient is not diabetic. Item D. When the patient is ambulatory, that patient is rescheduled. Item E. When the patient is rescheduled, that patient is diabetic. Item F. When the patient is symptomatic, that patient has no pacemaker. Item G. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient has a pacemaker. Item D is suspended when the patient is hypertensive. Item C is suspended when the patient is allergic. Item E is suspended when the patient is anemic. Item B outranks Item A. Item F outranks Item G. Item C outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Cosima is not diabetic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u014792", "pair_id": "u014792-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014792-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7379d134a40d3ed7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u014793-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mica is not experimental. Mica has a patch cycle of 37. Mica has no changelog. Mica is versioned. Mica is linted. Mica is flaky.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is linted, that build is obsolete. Item B. When the build is not linted, that build is tested. Item C. When the build is experimental, that build has a migration script. Item D. When the build has a changelog, that build is tagged. Item E. When the build has a patch cycle of less than 55, that build is documented. Item F. When the build is not minified, that build has no migration script. Item G. When the build is not versioned, that build is not profiled. Item H. When the build is merged, that build is signed. Item I. When the build is flaky, that build is not documented. Item J. When the build is localized, that build is not benchmarked. Item K. When the build is not minified, that build has a feature toggle. Item L. When the build is merged, that build is not documented. Item I outranks Item E. Item F outranks Item C. Item L outranks Item E. Question: What applies to Mica?", "options": ["has a feature toggle", "is tagged", "is tested", "has a migration script", "is documented", "is obsolete", "is signed"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is obsolete", "unit_id": "u014793", "pair_id": "u014793-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014793-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a32b169454ea8c4a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a16", "a3", "a8", "a1", "a7", "a14"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014793-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mica is not experimental. Mica has a patch cycle of 37. Mica has no changelog. Mica is not versioned. Mica is linted. Mica is flaky.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is linted, that build is obsolete. Item B. When the build is not linted, that build is tested. Item C. When the build is experimental, that build has a migration script. Item D. When the build has a changelog, that build is tagged. Item E. When the build has a patch cycle of less than 55, that build is documented. Item F. When the build is not minified, that build has no migration script. Item G. When the build is not versioned, that build is not profiled. Item H. When the build is merged, that build is signed. Item I. When the build is flaky, that build is not documented. Item J. When the build is localized, that build is not benchmarked. Item K. When the build is not minified, that build has a feature toggle. Item L. When the build is merged, that build is not documented. Item I outranks Item E. Item F outranks Item C. Item L outranks Item E. Question: What applies to Mica?", "options": ["has a feature toggle", "is tagged", "is tested", "has a migration script", "is documented", "is obsolete", "is signed"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is obsolete", "unit_id": "u014793", "pair_id": "u014793-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014793-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "52b877c0b7107d3a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a16", "a3", "a8", "a1", "a7", "a14"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014804-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Edda is not disputed. Edda is not reimbursed. Edda is not retired. Edda has no dashcam. Edda has an adjuster. Edda is a claimant. Edda is covered. Edda is bundled.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, and has no beneficiary, and is not uninsurable, that policyholder is lapsed. Item B. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, and is not reimbursed, that policyholder is appraised. Item C. When the policyholder has no deductible waiver, that policyholder has no roadside assistance. Item D. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, and has no premium discount, and is not reimbursed, that policyholder has a rider. Item E. When the policyholder is a claimant, and is bundled, that policyholder has no deductible waiver. Item F. When the policyholder is inspected, and is not covered, that policyholder is not litigated. Item G. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, and has a beneficiary, and has no adjuster, that policyholder is indemnified. Item H. When the policyholder has flood coverage, and is not a smoker, and is a claimant, that policyholder is not uninsurable. Item I. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, and has a premium discount, and has a dashcam, that policyholder is subrogated. Item J. When the policyholder is not retired, that policyholder is reinstated. Item K. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, and is reimbursed, and is not disputed, that policyholder is grandfathered. Question: What applies to Edda?", "options": ["has a rider", "is subrogated", "is grandfathered", "is lapsed", "is appraised", "is indemnified"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is appraised", "unit_id": "u014804", "pair_id": "u014804-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014804-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "41f76bcf6a28f968", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a20", "a15", "a17", "a16", "a6", "a14"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014804-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Edda is not disputed. Edda is reimbursed. Edda is not retired. Edda has no dashcam. Edda has an adjuster. Edda is a claimant. Edda is covered. Edda is bundled.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, and has no beneficiary, and is not uninsurable, that policyholder is lapsed. Item B. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, and is not reimbursed, that policyholder is appraised. Item C. When the policyholder has no deductible waiver, that policyholder has no roadside assistance. Item D. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, and has no premium discount, and is not reimbursed, that policyholder has a rider. Item E. When the policyholder is a claimant, and is bundled, that policyholder has no deductible waiver. Item F. When the policyholder is inspected, and is not covered, that policyholder is not litigated. Item G. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, and has a beneficiary, and has no adjuster, that policyholder is indemnified. Item H. When the policyholder has flood coverage, and is not a smoker, and is a claimant, that policyholder is not uninsurable. Item I. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, and has a premium discount, and has a dashcam, that policyholder is subrogated. Item J. When the policyholder is not retired, that policyholder is reinstated. Item K. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, and is reimbursed, and is not disputed, that policyholder is grandfathered. Question: What applies to Edda?", "options": ["has a rider", "is subrogated", "is grandfathered", "is lapsed", "is appraised", "is indemnified"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is grandfathered", "unit_id": "u014804", "pair_id": "u014804-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014804-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "65af97cee51aed94", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a20", "a15", "a17", "a16", "a6", "a14"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u014819-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rune has a signing bonus. Petra is not a graduate. Teodor has a seniority step of 83. Teodor has no signing bonus. Petra is not relocating. Petra has no signing bonus. Sigrid has a notice period of 94. Teodor has a notice period of 21. Sigrid has a commute radius of 6. Teodor is a graduate. Petra has a seniority step of 94. Teodor is relocating. Teodor has an aptitude quotient of 21. Teodor has a commute radius of 46. Teodor is bonded. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 97. Rune is not a graduate.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a background screening and likewise is eligible, so it is recommended. No. 2 While the given candidate is bonded, so it is not unionized. No. 3 While the given candidate has a notice period not below 20, so it is eligible. No. 4 While the given candidate has a commute radius not above 65, so it is not eligible. No. 5 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it has a background screening. No. 6 While the given candidate has a background screening and likewise is relocating and likewise has a seniority step not below 20, so it is fingerprinted. No. 7 While the given candidate has a background screening and likewise has an aptitude quotient not below 48, so it is unionized. No. 8 While the given candidate is a graduate, so it is sponsored. No. 9 While the given candidate has a signing bonus, so it has no portfolio. No. 10 While the given candidate is eligible, so it is not fingerprinted. No. 10 wins over No. 6. No. 3 wins over No. 4. No. 7 wins over No. 2. Question: Select what holds for Teodor: which option?", "options": ["is recommended", "is fingerprinted", "is unionized"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is recommended", "unit_id": "u014819", "pair_id": "u014819-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014819-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "216180c73346966b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a1", "a4", "a5"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014819-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rune has a signing bonus. Petra is not a graduate. Teodor has a seniority step of 83. Teodor has no signing bonus. Petra is not relocating. Petra has no signing bonus. Sigrid has a notice period of 94. Teodor has a notice period of 21. Sigrid has a commute radius of 6. Teodor is a graduate. Petra has a seniority step of 94. Teodor is relocating. Teodor has an aptitude quotient of 21. Teodor has a commute radius of 46. Teodor is bonded. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 97. Rune is not a graduate.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a background screening and likewise is eligible, so it is recommended. No. 2 While the given candidate is bonded, so it is not unionized. No. 3 While the given candidate has a notice period not below 55, so it is eligible. No. 4 While the given candidate has a commute radius not above 65, so it is not eligible. No. 5 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it has a background screening. No. 6 While the given candidate has a background screening and likewise is relocating and likewise has a seniority step not below 20, so it is fingerprinted. No. 7 While the given candidate has a background screening and likewise has an aptitude quotient not below 48, so it is unionized. No. 8 While the given candidate is a graduate, so it is sponsored. No. 9 While the given candidate has a signing bonus, so it has no portfolio. No. 10 While the given candidate is eligible, so it is not fingerprinted. No. 10 wins over No. 6. No. 3 wins over No. 4. No. 7 wins over No. 2. Question: Select what holds for Teodor: which option?", "options": ["is recommended", "is fingerprinted", "is unionized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is fingerprinted", "unit_id": "u014819", "pair_id": "u014819-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014819-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "372a6dc86c41d4d8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a1", "a4", "a5"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014911-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Teodor is not bonded. Ivo has no background screening. Teodor is eligible. Ivo is not freelance. Teodor is freelance. Ivo has a mentor. Teodor has no mentor.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it has a signing bonus. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is fingerprinted plus is freelance plus is unionized: then it is onboarded. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is fingerprinted plus is eligible: then it is not onboarded. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is freelance: then it is a veteran. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is a veteran: then it is fingerprinted. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is freelance plus has a mentor: then it is unionized. Policy II is waived if that candidate has a background screening plus is bonded. Question: Is it so that Teodor is onboarded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014911", "pair_id": "u014911-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014911-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ac80f819f1bb6619", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u014911-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Teodor is not bonded. Ivo has no background screening. Teodor is eligible. Ivo is not freelance. Teodor is freelance. Ivo has a mentor. Teodor has no mentor. Teodor is headhunted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it has a signing bonus. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is fingerprinted plus is freelance plus is unionized: then it is onboarded. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is fingerprinted plus is eligible: then it is not onboarded. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is freelance: then it is a veteran. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is a veteran: then it is fingerprinted. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is freelance plus has a mentor: then it is unionized. Policy II is waived if that candidate has a background screening plus is bonded. Question: Is it so that Teodor is onboarded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014911", "pair_id": "u014911-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014911-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "eb914e9119b9dcdd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u014933-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper is cached. Vesper is patched. Halcyon has a CPU quota of 81. Vesper has no GPU. Vesper has a CPU quota of 8.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is not backed up provided that it has no GPU. Section 2: a workload is not containerized provided that it is monitored. Section 3: a workload is sharded provided that it has a CPU quota of 77 or higher. Section 4: a workload is containerized provided that it is monitored. Section 5: a workload is monitored provided that it has no GPU. Section 6: a workload has no snapshot provided that it is not cached. Section 4 lapses for a workload if it is not patched. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it is patched. Section 4 lapses for a workload if it has a GPU. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it is patched. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it is patched. Question: Vesper is not containerized. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u014933", "pair_id": "u014933-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014933-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5875b266f8d898a5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014933-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper is cached. Vesper is not patched. Halcyon has a CPU quota of 81. Vesper has no GPU. Vesper has a CPU quota of 8.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is not backed up provided that it has no GPU. Section 2: a workload is not containerized provided that it is monitored. Section 3: a workload is sharded provided that it has a CPU quota of 77 or higher. Section 4: a workload is containerized provided that it is monitored. Section 5: a workload is monitored provided that it has no GPU. Section 6: a workload has no snapshot provided that it is not cached. Section 4 lapses for a workload if it is not patched. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it is patched. Section 4 lapses for a workload if it has a GPU. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it is patched. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it is patched. Question: Vesper is not containerized. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u014933", "pair_id": "u014933-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014933-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "27c4048c5f642931", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014938-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bruno has a claim frequency of 17. Bruno is not appraised. Zdenek is appraised. Zdenek is litigated.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a claim frequency of at most 16, then it has a premium discount. (2) If a policyholder is appraised, then it is lapsed. (3) If a policyholder is litigated, then it is not lapsed. (4) If a policyholder has a claim frequency above 16, then it is reinstated. When (2) and (3) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Bruno?", "options": ["is reinstated", "has a premium discount"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is reinstated", "unit_id": "u014938", "pair_id": "u014938-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014938-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3c3b6aded1fb0dff", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a2", "a5"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014938-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bruno has a claim frequency of 88. Bruno is not appraised. Zdenek is appraised. Zdenek is litigated.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a claim frequency of at most 16, then it has a premium discount. (2) If a policyholder is appraised, then it is lapsed. (3) If a policyholder is litigated, then it is not lapsed. (4) If a policyholder has a claim frequency above 16, then it is reinstated. When (2) and (3) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Bruno?", "options": ["is reinstated", "has a premium discount"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is reinstated", "unit_id": "u014938", "pair_id": "u014938-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u014938-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "75f35118d89e4414", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a2", "a5"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014979-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor has a parcel volume of 24. Nandor is not palletized. Nandor is not stamped.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is scanned provided that it is not sealed. Section 2: a parcel has a courier provided that it is stamped. Section 3: a parcel has a barcode provided that it has a parcel volume of 53 or higher. Section 4: a parcel is refrigerated provided that it is not palletized. Section 5: a parcel is delayed provided that it is palletized. Question: Which statement fits Nandor?", "options": ["is refrigerated", "is delayed", "has a barcode", "is scanned"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is refrigerated", "unit_id": "u014979", "pair_id": "u014979-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014979-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "b5b7ef94a73985f0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a5", "a7", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014979-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor has a parcel volume of 24. Nandor is palletized. Nandor is not stamped.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is scanned provided that it is not sealed. Section 2: a parcel has a courier provided that it is stamped. Section 3: a parcel has a barcode provided that it has a parcel volume of 53 or higher. Section 4: a parcel is refrigerated provided that it is not palletized. Section 5: a parcel is delayed provided that it is palletized. Question: Which statement fits Nandor?", "options": ["is refrigerated", "is delayed", "has a barcode", "is scanned"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is delayed", "unit_id": "u014979", "pair_id": "u014979-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014979-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "7dab63f2a1af5da5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a5", "a7", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014979-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor has a parcel volume of 24. Nandor is not palletized. Nandor is not stamped.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not sealed: then it is scanned. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is stamped: then it has a courier. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume no lower than 53: then it has a barcode. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is not palletized: then it is refrigerated. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is palletized: then it is delayed. Question: Which choice is right for Nandor?", "options": ["is refrigerated", "is delayed", "has a barcode", "is scanned"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is refrigerated", "unit_id": "u014979", "pair_id": "u014979-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014979-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "b5b7ef94a73985f0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a5", "a7", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014979-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor has a parcel volume of 24. Nandor is palletized. Nandor is not stamped.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not sealed: then it is scanned. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is stamped: then it has a courier. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume no lower than 53: then it has a barcode. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is not palletized: then it is refrigerated. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is palletized: then it is delayed. Question: Which choice is right for Nandor?", "options": ["is refrigerated", "is delayed", "has a barcode", "is scanned"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is delayed", "unit_id": "u014979", "pair_id": "u014979-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014979-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "7dab63f2a1af5da5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a5", "a7", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014979-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor has a parcel volume of 24. Nandor is not palletized. Nandor is not stamped.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is not sealed, it then is scanned. #2 Each time a parcel is stamped, it then has a courier. #3 Each time a parcel has a parcel volume of 53 or above, it then has a barcode. #4 Each time a parcel is not palletized, it then is refrigerated. #5 Each time a parcel is palletized, it then is delayed. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Nandor?", "options": ["is refrigerated", "is delayed", "has a barcode", "is scanned"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is refrigerated", "unit_id": "u014979", "pair_id": "u014979-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014979-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "b5b7ef94a73985f0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a5", "a7", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u014979-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor has a parcel volume of 24. Nandor is palletized. Nandor is not stamped.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is not sealed, it then is scanned. #2 Each time a parcel is stamped, it then has a courier. #3 Each time a parcel has a parcel volume of 53 or above, it then has a barcode. #4 Each time a parcel is not palletized, it then is refrigerated. #5 Each time a parcel is palletized, it then is delayed. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Nandor?", "options": ["is refrigerated", "is delayed", "has a barcode", "is scanned"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is delayed", "unit_id": "u014979", "pair_id": "u014979-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u014979-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "7dab63f2a1af5da5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a5", "a7", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015020-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta has a risk tier of 5. Greta has a guarantor. Greta is audited. Greta is not creditworthy. Greta is garnished.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner plus has a risk tier no higher than 83 plus is garnished: then it is not vetted. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner plus has a risk tier no higher than 83: then it is vetted. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is garnished plus is audited: then it is a homeowner. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a guarantor plus has an escrow account: then it is amortized. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is garnished: then it is not amortized. Policy I is waived if that borrower is creditworthy. Policy IV is waived if that borrower is audited. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Greta is vetted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015020", "pair_id": "u015020-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015020-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9f3faa93a50332b4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u015020-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta has a risk tier of 5. Greta has a guarantor. Greta is audited. Greta is not creditworthy. Greta is garnished.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner plus has a risk tier no higher than 83 plus is garnished: then it is not vetted. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner plus has a risk tier higher than 83: then it is vetted. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is garnished plus is audited: then it is a homeowner. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a guarantor plus has an escrow account: then it is amortized. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is garnished: then it is not amortized. Policy I is waived if that borrower is creditworthy. Policy IV is waived if that borrower is audited. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Greta is vetted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015020", "pair_id": "u015020-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015020-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "128388e4e1b5f225", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u015020-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta has a risk tier of 5. Greta has a guarantor. Greta is audited. Greta is not creditworthy. Greta is garnished.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is a homeowner and additionally has a risk tier of 83 or below and additionally is garnished, it then is not vetted. #2 Each time a borrower is a homeowner and additionally has a risk tier of 83 or below, it then is vetted. #3 Each time a borrower is garnished and additionally is audited, it then is a homeowner. #4 Each time a borrower has a guarantor and additionally has an escrow account, it then is amortized. #5 Each time a borrower is garnished, it then is not amortized. #1 is set aside if a borrower is creditworthy. #4 is set aside if a borrower is audited. #5 yields to #4. #1 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Greta is vetted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015020", "pair_id": "u015020-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015020-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9f3faa93a50332b4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u015020-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta has a risk tier of 5. Greta has a guarantor. Greta is audited. Greta is not creditworthy. Greta is garnished.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is a homeowner and additionally has a risk tier of 83 or below and additionally is garnished, it then is not vetted. #2 Each time a borrower is a homeowner and additionally has a risk tier greater than 83, it then is vetted. #3 Each time a borrower is garnished and additionally is audited, it then is a homeowner. #4 Each time a borrower has a guarantor and additionally has an escrow account, it then is amortized. #5 Each time a borrower is garnished, it then is not amortized. #1 is set aside if a borrower is creditworthy. #4 is set aside if a borrower is audited. #5 yields to #4. #1 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Greta is vetted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015020", "pair_id": "u015020-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015020-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "128388e4e1b5f225", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u015024-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma has a team size of 72. Gemma has seed funding. Gemma has a milestone total of 35.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is not embargoed, that proposal is longitudinal. Item B. When the proposal is embargoed, that proposal has no industry backing. Item C. When the proposal has a team size of no less than 72, that proposal has a steering committee. Item D. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item E. When the proposal has ethics clearance, that proposal is embargoed. Item F. When the proposal is embargoed, that proposal has industry backing. Item G. When the proposal has a milestone total of less than 59, that proposal has ethics clearance. Item F is suspended when the proposal has a milestone total of more than 17. Item B is suspended when the proposal has seed funding. Item D is suspended when the proposal has a milestone total of more than 66. Item A is suspended when the proposal has seed funding. Item B is suspended when the proposal has a postdoc. Item C is suspended when the proposal is peer reviewed. Item B is suspended when the proposal has a milestone total of no more than 17. Question: Can one infer that Gemma has industry backing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015024", "pair_id": "u015024-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015024-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "153f90c64607f8ed", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u015024-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma has a team size of 22. Gemma has seed funding. Gemma has a milestone total of 35.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is not embargoed, that proposal is longitudinal. Item B. When the proposal is embargoed, that proposal has no industry backing. Item C. When the proposal has a team size of no less than 72, that proposal has a steering committee. Item D. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item E. When the proposal has ethics clearance, that proposal is embargoed. Item F. When the proposal is embargoed, that proposal has industry backing. Item G. When the proposal has a milestone total of less than 59, that proposal has ethics clearance. Item F is suspended when the proposal has a milestone total of more than 17. Item B is suspended when the proposal has seed funding. Item D is suspended when the proposal has a milestone total of more than 66. Item A is suspended when the proposal has seed funding. Item B is suspended when the proposal has a postdoc. Item C is suspended when the proposal is peer reviewed. Item B is suspended when the proposal has a milestone total of no more than 17. Question: Can one infer that Gemma has industry backing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015024", "pair_id": "u015024-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015024-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5f73c2d96382b923", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u015035-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb has a postdoc. Deneb has a steering committee. Deneb is theoretical. Deneb is not multicenter.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has a steering committee, that proposal is translational. Item B. When the proposal is shortlisted, that proposal is endorsed. Item C. When the proposal is not translational, that proposal is renewed. Item D. When the proposal has a postdoc, that proposal is not translational. Item E. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal has a patent filing. Item F. When the proposal is translational, that proposal is peer reviewed. Item G. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal is budgeted. Item H. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal is not budgeted. Item I. When the proposal has a patent filing, that proposal is not peer reviewed. Item G is suspended when the proposal is theoretical. Item H is suspended when the proposal is not theoretical. Item C is suspended when the proposal is a pilot study. Item I is suspended when the proposal is not multicenter. Item G outranks Item H. Item F outranks Item I. Item A outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Deneb is budgeted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015035", "pair_id": "u015035-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015035-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "10ad3b79c3a75209", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015035-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb has a postdoc. Deneb is shortlisted. Deneb has a steering committee. Deneb is theoretical. Deneb is not multicenter.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has a steering committee, that proposal is translational. Item B. When the proposal is shortlisted, that proposal is endorsed. Item C. When the proposal is not translational, that proposal is renewed. Item D. When the proposal has a postdoc, that proposal is not translational. Item E. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal has a patent filing. Item F. When the proposal is translational, that proposal is peer reviewed. Item G. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal is budgeted. Item H. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal is not budgeted. Item I. When the proposal has a patent filing, that proposal is not peer reviewed. Item G is suspended when the proposal is theoretical. Item H is suspended when the proposal is not theoretical. Item C is suspended when the proposal is a pilot study. Item I is suspended when the proposal is not multicenter. Item G outranks Item H. Item F outranks Item I. Item A outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Deneb is budgeted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015035", "pair_id": "u015035-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015035-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6f3779a4205834b6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015037-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile is weighed. Odile is delayed. Mirela is palletized. Mirela is weighed. Mirela is oversized. Mirela is not rerouted. Mirela is delayed. Odile is not palletized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it is not registered. Provision 2: when the parcel here is not weighed, thus it is not consolidated. Provision 3: when the parcel here is not weighed, thus it is consolidated. Provision 4: when the parcel here is delayed, thus it is perishable. Provision 5: when the parcel here is not weighed, thus it is registered. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is not palletized. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is oversized. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is not oversized. Provision 1 has no effect when the parcel here is palletized. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is not oversized. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Mirela is consolidated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015037", "pair_id": "u015037-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015037-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "33d0e5c096dd2a0c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015037-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile is weighed. Odile is delayed. Mirela is palletized. Mirela is weighed. Mirela is oversized. Mirela is not rerouted. Mirela is delayed. Odile is not palletized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it is not registered. Provision 2: when the parcel here is not weighed, thus it is not consolidated. Provision 3: when the parcel here is not weighed, thus it is consolidated. Provision 4: when the parcel here is delayed, thus it is perishable. Provision 5: when the parcel here is weighed, thus it is registered. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is not palletized. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is oversized. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is not oversized. Provision 1 has no effect when the parcel here is palletized. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is not oversized. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Mirela is consolidated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015037", "pair_id": "u015037-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015037-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "94709a371252ae39", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015043-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has a premium band of 35. Celeste has a peril factor of 31. Yara is a smoker. Celeste is not a smoker. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 57. Celeste is uninsurable. Wanda has a premium band of 16.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it is reinstated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is appraised, thus it has flood coverage. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling at or below 52, thus it is a claimant. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beyond 52, thus it is disputed. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is disputed, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is bundled. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 8: when the policyholder here has a premium band at or below 48, thus it is retired. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it is appraised. Provision 10: when the policyholder here is a smoker, thus it is indemnified. Provision 11: when the policyholder here has a peril factor at or above 88, thus it is subrogated. Provision 12: when the policyholder here has a claim frequency beneath 20, thus it is inspected. Provision 13: when the policyholder here is inspected, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here is uninsurable. Question: Which one describes Celeste?", "options": ["has a dashcam", "is bundled", "has flood coverage", "has a premium discount", "has a beneficiary", "is reinstated"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has flood coverage", "unit_id": "u015043", "pair_id": "u015043-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015043-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "58e1a6fe3ea0d8bf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a15", "a1", "a10", "a13", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015043-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has a premium band of 35. Celeste has a peril factor of 31. Yara is a smoker. Celeste is not a smoker. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 57. Celeste is not uninsurable. Wanda has a premium band of 16.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it is reinstated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is appraised, thus it has flood coverage. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling at or below 52, thus it is a claimant. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling beyond 52, thus it is disputed. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is disputed, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is bundled. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 8: when the policyholder here has a premium band at or below 48, thus it is retired. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it is appraised. Provision 10: when the policyholder here is a smoker, thus it is indemnified. Provision 11: when the policyholder here has a peril factor at or above 88, thus it is subrogated. Provision 12: when the policyholder here has a claim frequency beneath 20, thus it is inspected. Provision 13: when the policyholder here is inspected, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here is uninsurable. Question: Which one describes Celeste?", "options": ["has a dashcam", "is bundled", "has flood coverage", "has a premium discount", "has a beneficiary", "is reinstated"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is reinstated", "unit_id": "u015043", "pair_id": "u015043-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015043-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c9b6f124a425f258", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a15", "a1", "a10", "a13", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015043-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has a premium band of 35. Celeste has a peril factor of 31. Yara is a smoker. Celeste is not a smoker. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 57. Celeste is uninsurable. Wanda has a premium band of 16.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is retired, so it is reinstated. No. 2 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it has flood coverage. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a payout ceiling not above 52, so it is a claimant. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a payout ceiling that exceeds 52, so it is disputed. No. 5 While the given policyholder is disputed, so it has a premium discount. No. 6 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is bundled. No. 7 While the given policyholder is subrogated, so it has a dashcam. No. 8 While the given policyholder has a premium band not above 48, so it is retired. No. 9 While the given policyholder is uninsurable, so it is appraised. No. 10 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it is indemnified. No. 11 While the given policyholder has a peril factor not below 88, so it is subrogated. No. 12 While the given policyholder has a claim frequency that falls below 20, so it is inspected. No. 13 While the given policyholder is inspected, so it has a beneficiary. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is uninsurable. Question: Select what holds for Celeste: which option?", "options": ["has a dashcam", "is bundled", "has flood coverage", "has a premium discount", "has a beneficiary", "is reinstated"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has flood coverage", "unit_id": "u015043", "pair_id": "u015043-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015043-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "58e1a6fe3ea0d8bf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a15", "a1", "a10", "a13", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015043-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has a premium band of 35. Celeste has a peril factor of 31. Yara is a smoker. Celeste is not a smoker. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 57. Celeste is not uninsurable. Wanda has a premium band of 16.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is retired, so it is reinstated. No. 2 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it has flood coverage. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a payout ceiling not above 52, so it is a claimant. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a payout ceiling that exceeds 52, so it is disputed. No. 5 While the given policyholder is disputed, so it has a premium discount. No. 6 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is bundled. No. 7 While the given policyholder is subrogated, so it has a dashcam. No. 8 While the given policyholder has a premium band not above 48, so it is retired. No. 9 While the given policyholder is uninsurable, so it is appraised. No. 10 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it is indemnified. No. 11 While the given policyholder has a peril factor not below 88, so it is subrogated. No. 12 While the given policyholder has a claim frequency that falls below 20, so it is inspected. No. 13 While the given policyholder is inspected, so it has a beneficiary. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is uninsurable. Question: Select what holds for Celeste: which option?", "options": ["has a dashcam", "is bundled", "has flood coverage", "has a premium discount", "has a beneficiary", "is reinstated"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is reinstated", "unit_id": "u015043", "pair_id": "u015043-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015043-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c9b6f124a425f258", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a15", "a1", "a10", "a13", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015063-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is referred. Cosima is not fasting. Cosima is not triaged. Benedek is not bedridden. Cosima is hypertensive. Benedek is not fasting. Vilja is not hypertensive. Cosima is postoperative. Vilja is postoperative. Benedek is postoperative. Cosima is not anemic. Vilja is bedridden.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is hypertensive plus is fasting plus is not postoperative: then it has an interpreter. Policy II. Suppose that patient has an interpreter: then it has a caregiver. Policy III. Suppose that patient is not fasting: then it has no caregiver. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is hypertensive plus is not fasting plus is postoperative: then it has no interpreter. Policy V. Suppose that patient is anemic: then it is sedated. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is bedridden plus is referred plus is not anemic: then it is not asthmatic. Policy II is waived if that patient is not fasting. Policy IV is waived if that patient is ambulatory plus is fasting. Policy VI is waived if that patient is triaged. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy IV. Question: Is it so that Cosima has an interpreter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015063", "pair_id": "u015063-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015063-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4107873f56acbd7b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015063-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is referred. Cosima is not fasting. Cosima is not triaged. Benedek is not bedridden. Cosima is hypertensive. Benedek is not fasting. Vilja is not hypertensive. Cosima is postoperative. Vilja is postoperative. Benedek is postoperative. Cosima is not anemic. Vilja is bedridden.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is hypertensive plus is fasting plus is not postoperative: then it has an interpreter. Policy II. Suppose that patient has an interpreter: then it has a caregiver. Policy III. Suppose that patient is not fasting: then it has no caregiver. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is hypertensive plus is not fasting plus is not postoperative: then it has no interpreter. Policy V. Suppose that patient is anemic: then it is sedated. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is bedridden plus is referred plus is not anemic: then it is not asthmatic. Policy II is waived if that patient is not fasting. Policy IV is waived if that patient is ambulatory plus is fasting. Policy VI is waived if that patient is triaged. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy IV. Question: Is it so that Cosima has an interpreter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015063", "pair_id": "u015063-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015063-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "565a9593f63f2515", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015080-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is waitlisted. Yusuf is postoperative. Yusuf is not diabetic. Xenia is triaged. Wendel is not allergic. Xenia is not contagious. Wendel is not pregnant. Xenia has a caregiver. Wendel is not sedated. Wendel is not triaged. Xenia has no interpreter. Yusuf is sedated. Wendel is waitlisted. Xenia is rescheduled. Xenia is not postoperative. Xenia is sedated. Xenia is diabetic.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is triaged, and has a caregiver, and is not diabetic, that patient is vaccinated. Item B. When the patient is triaged, and is contagious, that patient is referred. Item C. When the patient is pregnant, that patient is not hypertensive. Item D. When the patient is not waitlisted, that patient is not referred. Item E. When the patient is postoperative, that patient is symptomatic. Item F. When the patient has no interpreter, and is allergic, that patient is hypertensive. Item G. When the patient is triaged, and is pregnant, and is waitlisted, that patient is bedridden. Item H. When the patient is triaged, and is diabetic, and is rescheduled, that patient is ambulatory. Item I. When the patient is triaged, and is not waitlisted, that patient is anemic. Item H is suspended when the patient is pregnant. Item F is suspended when the patient is allergic. Item E is suspended when the patient is waitlisted. Item I is suspended when the patient is sedated. Item D outranks Item B. Item F outranks Item C. Question: What applies to Xenia?", "options": ["is anemic", "is referred", "is bedridden", "is ambulatory", "is vaccinated"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is ambulatory", "unit_id": "u015080", "pair_id": "u015080-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015080-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cdfa0703d2f75c0d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a7", "a9", "a11", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015080-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is waitlisted. Yusuf is postoperative. Yusuf is not diabetic. Xenia is triaged. Wendel is not allergic. Xenia is not contagious. Wendel is not pregnant. Xenia has a caregiver. Wendel is not sedated. Wendel is not triaged. Xenia has no interpreter. Yusuf is sedated. Wendel is waitlisted. Xenia is rescheduled. Xenia is postoperative. Xenia is sedated. Xenia is diabetic.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is triaged, and has a caregiver, and is not diabetic, that patient is vaccinated. Item B. When the patient is triaged, and is contagious, that patient is referred. Item C. When the patient is pregnant, that patient is not hypertensive. Item D. When the patient is not waitlisted, that patient is not referred. Item E. When the patient is postoperative, that patient is symptomatic. Item F. When the patient has no interpreter, and is allergic, that patient is hypertensive. Item G. When the patient is triaged, and is pregnant, and is waitlisted, that patient is bedridden. Item H. When the patient is triaged, and is diabetic, and is rescheduled, that patient is ambulatory. Item I. When the patient is triaged, and is not waitlisted, that patient is anemic. Item H is suspended when the patient is pregnant. Item F is suspended when the patient is allergic. Item E is suspended when the patient is waitlisted. Item I is suspended when the patient is sedated. Item D outranks Item B. Item F outranks Item C. Question: What applies to Xenia?", "options": ["is anemic", "is referred", "is bedridden", "is ambulatory", "is vaccinated"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is ambulatory", "unit_id": "u015080", "pair_id": "u015080-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015080-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1201dfa8a52231bc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a7", "a9", "a11", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015118-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is not postoperative. Aurel is postoperative. Aurel is rescheduled.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is postoperative, then it has an interpreter. (2) If a patient is not rescheduled, then it is not waitlisted. (3) If a patient has a pulse rate of at least 17, then it is waitlisted. (4) If a patient is rescheduled, then it has no interpreter. When (4) and (1) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (2) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Aurel is not waitlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015118", "pair_id": "u015118-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015118-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "473c8060fb60c7e7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015118-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is not postoperative. Aurel is postoperative. Aurel is rescheduled.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is postoperative, then it has an interpreter. (2) If a patient is rescheduled, then it is not waitlisted. (3) If a patient has a pulse rate of at least 17, then it is waitlisted. (4) If a patient is rescheduled, then it has no interpreter. When (4) and (1) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (2) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Aurel is not waitlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015118", "pair_id": "u015118-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015118-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "480d111e12963001", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015162-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has a risk tier of 55. Wiebke is not vetted. Evren is not underwritten. Bastien is underwritten. Wiebke has a credit rating of 30. Bastien has no cosigner. Bastien has a lien. Bastien has a credit rating of 78. Evren is vetted. Wiebke has a risk tier of 99.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is vetted while has a risk tier beneath 66 while has a cosigner, thus it has collateral. Provision 2: when the borrower here has a cosigner, thus it is not foreclosed. Provision 3: when the borrower here is foreclosed while has a credit rating at or above 26 while is creditworthy, thus it is a depositor. Provision 4: when the borrower here has a lien, thus it has no collateral. Provision 5: when the borrower here is foreclosed while has a credit rating beneath 26, thus it is not a depositor. Provision 6: when the borrower here is not underwritten, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 7: when the borrower here has a debt ratio at or below 88 while has a credit rating at or above 67, thus it is creditworthy. Provision 1 has no effect when the borrower here has a debt ratio at or above 73. Provision 7 has no effect when the borrower here has a risk tier at or below 74. Provision 7 has no effect when the borrower here has a debt ratio at or above 52 while is underwritten. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Bastien is not a depositor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015162", "pair_id": "u015162-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015162-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "152192f4cf842157", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u015162-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has a risk tier of 55. Wiebke is not vetted. Evren is not underwritten. Bastien is underwritten. Wiebke has a credit rating of 30. Bastien has no cosigner. Bastien has a lien. Bastien has a credit rating of 78. Evren is vetted. Wiebke has a risk tier of 99.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is vetted while has a risk tier beneath 66 while has a cosigner, thus it has collateral. Provision 2: when the borrower here has a cosigner, thus it is not foreclosed. Provision 3: when the borrower here is foreclosed while has a credit rating at or above 26 while is creditworthy, thus it is a depositor. Provision 4: when the borrower here has a lien, thus it has no collateral. Provision 5: when the borrower here is foreclosed while has a credit rating beneath 26, thus it is not a depositor. Provision 6: when the borrower here is underwritten, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 7: when the borrower here has a debt ratio at or below 88 while has a credit rating at or above 67, thus it is creditworthy. Provision 1 has no effect when the borrower here has a debt ratio at or above 73. Provision 7 has no effect when the borrower here has a risk tier at or below 74. Provision 7 has no effect when the borrower here has a debt ratio at or above 52 while is underwritten. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Bastien is not a depositor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015162", "pair_id": "u015162-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015162-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9c732de1a492c89b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u015166-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale has a lint backlog of 96. Schist has a lint backlog of 36. Feldspar is not notarized. Shale is notarized. Shale is tested.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is documented provided that it has a lint backlog lower than 67. Section 2: a build is flaky provided that it has a lint backlog of 97 or lower. Section 3: a build is compiled provided that it is notarized. Section 4: a build has a security advisory provided that it is tested. Section 5: a build is benchmarked provided that it is compiled. Section 6: a build is localized provided that it has a lint backlog of 48 or lower. Section 7: a build is not documented provided that it is notarized. Section 8: a build is not benchmarked provided that it is flaky. Section 9: a build has no security advisory provided that it has a lint backlog of 25 or lower. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Shale is benchmarked. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015166", "pair_id": "u015166-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015166-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "79b68080dc853659", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015166-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale has a lint backlog of 96. Schist has a lint backlog of 36. Feldspar is not notarized. Shale is notarized. Shale is tested.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is documented provided that it has a lint backlog lower than 67. Section 2: a build is flaky provided that it has a lint backlog of 29 or lower. Section 3: a build is compiled provided that it is notarized. Section 4: a build has a security advisory provided that it is tested. Section 5: a build is benchmarked provided that it is compiled. Section 6: a build is localized provided that it has a lint backlog of 48 or lower. Section 7: a build is not documented provided that it is notarized. Section 8: a build is not benchmarked provided that it is flaky. Section 9: a build has no security advisory provided that it has a lint backlog of 25 or lower. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Shale is benchmarked. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015166", "pair_id": "u015166-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015166-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "64aefd132a8fe769", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015176-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is not labeled. Quentin is scanned. Quentin is oversized. Quentin is weighed. Quentin is prepaid.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is tracked, thus it is not palletized. Provision 2: when the parcel here is scanned while is oversized, thus it has a courier. Provision 3: when the parcel here has a locker slot, thus it has no courier. Provision 4: when the parcel here is oversized while is weighed, thus it is stamped. Provision 5: when the parcel here is stamped while has a locker slot, thus it is misrouted. Provision 6: when the parcel here has a waybill, thus it is tracked. Provision 7: when the parcel here is palletized while is scanned, thus it is fragile. Provision 8: when the parcel here is stamped while is tracked, thus it is registered. Provision 9: when the parcel here is stamped while is prepaid, thus it is palletized. Provision 8 has no effect when the parcel here has a locker slot. Provision 7 has no effect when the parcel here is weighed. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Which one describes Quentin?", "options": ["is registered", "is palletized", "is misrouted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is palletized", "unit_id": "u015176", "pair_id": "u015176-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015176-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6cad57ffc5bd723c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a6", "a13"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u015176-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is not labeled. Quentin is scanned. Quentin is oversized. Quentin has a waybill. Quentin is weighed. Quentin is prepaid.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is tracked, thus it is not palletized. Provision 2: when the parcel here is scanned while is oversized, thus it has a courier. Provision 3: when the parcel here has a locker slot, thus it has no courier. Provision 4: when the parcel here is oversized while is weighed, thus it is stamped. Provision 5: when the parcel here is stamped while has a locker slot, thus it is misrouted. Provision 6: when the parcel here has a waybill, thus it is tracked. Provision 7: when the parcel here is palletized while is scanned, thus it is fragile. Provision 8: when the parcel here is stamped while is tracked, thus it is registered. Provision 9: when the parcel here is stamped while is prepaid, thus it is palletized. Provision 8 has no effect when the parcel here has a locker slot. Provision 7 has no effect when the parcel here is weighed. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Which one describes Quentin?", "options": ["is registered", "is palletized", "is misrouted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is registered", "unit_id": "u015176", "pair_id": "u015176-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015176-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec4fb1e3defaab25", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a6", "a13"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u015176-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is not labeled. Quentin is scanned. Quentin is oversized. Quentin is weighed. Quentin is prepaid.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is tracked, it thereby is not palletized. Point B. If said parcel is scanned and further is oversized, it thereby has a courier. Point C. If said parcel has a locker slot, it thereby has no courier. Point D. If said parcel is oversized and further is weighed, it thereby is stamped. Point E. If said parcel is stamped and further has a locker slot, it thereby is misrouted. Point F. If said parcel has a waybill, it thereby is tracked. Point G. If said parcel is palletized and further is scanned, it thereby is fragile. Point H. If said parcel is stamped and further is tracked, it thereby is registered. Point I. If said parcel is stamped and further is prepaid, it thereby is palletized. Point H is cancelled if said parcel has a locker slot. Point G is cancelled if said parcel is weighed. Point A supersedes Point I. Point B supersedes Point C. Question: Which choice is true for Quentin?", "options": ["is registered", "is palletized", "is misrouted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is palletized", "unit_id": "u015176", "pair_id": "u015176-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015176-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6cad57ffc5bd723c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a6", "a13"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u015176-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is not labeled. Quentin is scanned. Quentin is oversized. Quentin has a waybill. Quentin is weighed. Quentin is prepaid.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is tracked, it thereby is not palletized. Point B. If said parcel is scanned and further is oversized, it thereby has a courier. Point C. If said parcel has a locker slot, it thereby has no courier. Point D. If said parcel is oversized and further is weighed, it thereby is stamped. Point E. If said parcel is stamped and further has a locker slot, it thereby is misrouted. Point F. If said parcel has a waybill, it thereby is tracked. Point G. If said parcel is palletized and further is scanned, it thereby is fragile. Point H. If said parcel is stamped and further is tracked, it thereby is registered. Point I. If said parcel is stamped and further is prepaid, it thereby is palletized. Point H is cancelled if said parcel has a locker slot. Point G is cancelled if said parcel is weighed. Point A supersedes Point I. Point B supersedes Point C. Question: Which choice is true for Quentin?", "options": ["is registered", "is palletized", "is misrouted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is registered", "unit_id": "u015176", "pair_id": "u015176-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015176-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec4fb1e3defaab25", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a6", "a13"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u015213-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke is not a depositor. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 89. Wiebke has no escrow account. Ingrid has an escrow account.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has no escrow account, thus it is garnished. Provision 2: when the borrower here is vetted, thus it is not indebted. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a debt ratio at or above 60, thus it is indebted. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here has an escrow account. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Ingrid is not a depositor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015213", "pair_id": "u015213-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015213-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d56a7a9095b6113f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015213-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke is not a depositor. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 89. Ingrid is not a depositor. Wiebke has no escrow account. Ingrid has an escrow account.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has no escrow account, thus it is garnished. Provision 2: when the borrower here is vetted, thus it is not indebted. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a debt ratio at or above 60, thus it is indebted. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here has an escrow account. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Ingrid is not a depositor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015213", "pair_id": "u015213-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015213-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f08b916d812eb3f3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015322-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor has a seniority step of 5. Noor is not a veteran. Ivo has a seniority step of 13. Sigrid has a seniority step of 17. Petra has a seniority step of 89. Noor is licensed. Sigrid is interviewed. Sigrid is not a veteran. Sigrid is licensed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby has a diploma. Point B. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby is bilingual. Point C. If said candidate has a seniority step in excess of 76, it thereby is onboarded. Point A is cancelled if said candidate is a veteran. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is not interviewed. Question: Statement: Sigrid is licensed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015322", "pair_id": "u015322-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015322-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "681caf4183aad30f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015322-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor has a seniority step of 5. Noor is not a veteran. Ivo has a seniority step of 13. Sigrid has a seniority step of 17. Petra has a seniority step of 89. Noor is licensed. Sigrid is interviewed. Sigrid is not a veteran. Sigrid is not licensed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby has a diploma. Point B. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby is bilingual. Point C. If said candidate has a seniority step in excess of 76, it thereby is onboarded. Point A is cancelled if said candidate is a veteran. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is not interviewed. Question: Statement: Sigrid is licensed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015322", "pair_id": "u015322-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015322-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3062016bb8b3fa98", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015326-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is not delayed. Nandor is not perishable. Nandor is registered. Nandor is not hazardous. Nandor has a courier. Nandor is refrigerated.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is perishable, that parcel has no waybill. Item B. When the parcel has a courier, that parcel is oversized. Item C. When the parcel is refrigerated, and is perishable, that parcel is misrouted. Item D. When the parcel is hazardous, that parcel is not prepaid. Item E. When the parcel is delayed, that parcel is not misrouted. Item F. When the parcel is refrigerated, that parcel is prepaid. Item G. When the parcel is delayed, that parcel is not oversized. Item H. When the parcel is refrigerated, and is registered, that parcel has a waybill. Item G outranks Item B. Item F outranks Item D. Item C outranks Item E. Item A outranks Item H. Question: What applies to Nandor?", "options": ["is misrouted", "has a waybill"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a waybill", "unit_id": "u015326", "pair_id": "u015326-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015326-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9590f167798c638d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a3"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u015326-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is delayed. Nandor is not perishable. Nandor is registered. Nandor is not hazardous. Nandor has a courier. Nandor is refrigerated.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is perishable, that parcel has no waybill. Item B. When the parcel has a courier, that parcel is oversized. Item C. When the parcel is refrigerated, and is perishable, that parcel is misrouted. Item D. When the parcel is hazardous, that parcel is not prepaid. Item E. When the parcel is delayed, that parcel is not misrouted. Item F. When the parcel is refrigerated, that parcel is prepaid. Item G. When the parcel is delayed, that parcel is not oversized. Item H. When the parcel is refrigerated, and is registered, that parcel has a waybill. Item G outranks Item B. Item F outranks Item D. Item C outranks Item E. Item A outranks Item H. Question: What applies to Nandor?", "options": ["is misrouted", "has a waybill"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a waybill", "unit_id": "u015326", "pair_id": "u015326-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015326-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2c2924e8b9a90089", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a3"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u015396-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is palletized. Mirela is oversized. Mirela is not palletized. Liesel is not misrouted. Liesel is sealed. Nandor is sealed. Nandor is not misrouted. Mirela is not misrouted. Liesel is not palletized. Liesel is not oversized.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is not misrouted, then it is not registered. (2) If a parcel is palletized, then it is not delayed. (3) If a parcel is sealed, then it is registered. (1) is void if the parcel is misrouted. When (1) and (3) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Mirela is oversized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015396", "pair_id": "u015396-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015396-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0cf4cac2b6e1626d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015396-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is palletized. Mirela is oversized. Mirela is not sealed. Mirela is not palletized. Liesel is not misrouted. Liesel is sealed. Nandor is sealed. Nandor is not misrouted. Mirela is not misrouted. Liesel is not palletized. Liesel is not oversized.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is not misrouted, then it is not registered. (2) If a parcel is palletized, then it is not delayed. (3) If a parcel is sealed, then it is registered. (1) is void if the parcel is misrouted. When (1) and (3) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Mirela is oversized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015396", "pair_id": "u015396-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015396-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9450353ecfb6b1c8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015402-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is profiled. Talc is compiled. Obsidian has a test yield of 12. Obsidian is not compiled. Schist is not compiled. Talc has a test yield of 73.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is profiled, it also is flaky. Clause 2: once any build has a test yield of 26 or more, it also is benchmarked. Clause 3: once any build has a test yield of 12 or more, it also is signed. Clause 4: once any build is benchmarked, it also is notarized. Clause 5: once any build is benchmarked, it also is not notarized. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build is compiled. Clause 5 does not hold for a build when any build is compiled. Clause 5 does not hold for a build when any build has a test yield under 51. Clause 4 does not hold for a build when any build has a test yield of 51 or more. Clause 1 does not hold for a build when any build is profiled. Question: Does it follow that Obsidian is notarized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015402", "pair_id": "u015402-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015402-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7f507398bb63eba5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015402-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is profiled. Talc is compiled. Obsidian has a test yield of 12. Obsidian is not compiled. Schist is not compiled. Talc has a test yield of 73.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is profiled, it also is flaky. Clause 2: once any build has a test yield of 26 or more, it also is benchmarked. Clause 3: once any build has a test yield of 20 or more, it also is signed. Clause 4: once any build is benchmarked, it also is notarized. Clause 5: once any build is benchmarked, it also is not notarized. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build is compiled. Clause 5 does not hold for a build when any build is compiled. Clause 5 does not hold for a build when any build has a test yield under 51. Clause 4 does not hold for a build when any build has a test yield of 51 or more. Clause 1 does not hold for a build when any build is profiled. Question: Does it follow that Obsidian is notarized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015402", "pair_id": "u015402-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015402-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3b3c98a1200d703d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015411-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not palletized. Kaveh is prepaid. Kaveh is hazardous. Kaveh has a postal zone of 87. Kaveh is undeliverable. Ulla is undeliverable. Ulla is not hazardous. Kaveh is damaged.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is hazardous while is damaged, thus it is not fragile. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a postal zone at or below 35, thus it is perishable. Provision 3: when the parcel here is hazardous while is not damaged while is prepaid, thus it is fragile. Provision 4: when the parcel here is undeliverable, thus it is not refrigerated. Provision 5: when the parcel here is damaged, thus it is rerouted. Question: Would it be right to say that Kaveh is fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015411", "pair_id": "u015411-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015411-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e4ce3f1043e98b4d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015411-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not palletized. Kaveh is prepaid. Kaveh is hazardous. Kaveh has a postal zone of 87. Kaveh is not undeliverable. Ulla is undeliverable. Ulla is not hazardous. Kaveh is damaged.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is hazardous while is damaged, thus it is not fragile. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a postal zone at or below 35, thus it is perishable. Provision 3: when the parcel here is hazardous while is not damaged while is prepaid, thus it is fragile. Provision 4: when the parcel here is undeliverable, thus it is not refrigerated. Provision 5: when the parcel here is damaged, thus it is rerouted. Question: Would it be right to say that Kaveh is fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015411", "pair_id": "u015411-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015411-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "31e76985a2b4bb3c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015411-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not palletized. Kaveh is prepaid. Kaveh is hazardous. Kaveh has a postal zone of 87. Kaveh is undeliverable. Ulla is undeliverable. Ulla is not hazardous. Kaveh is damaged.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is hazardous and likewise is damaged, so it is not fragile. No. 2 While the given parcel has a postal zone not above 35, so it is perishable. No. 3 While the given parcel is hazardous and likewise is not damaged and likewise is prepaid, so it is fragile. No. 4 While the given parcel is undeliverable, so it is not refrigerated. No. 5 While the given parcel is damaged, so it is rerouted. Question: Is the claim \"Kaveh is fragile\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015411", "pair_id": "u015411-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015411-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e4ce3f1043e98b4d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015411-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not palletized. Kaveh is prepaid. Kaveh is hazardous. Kaveh has a postal zone of 87. Kaveh is not undeliverable. Ulla is undeliverable. Ulla is not hazardous. Kaveh is damaged.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is hazardous and likewise is damaged, so it is not fragile. No. 2 While the given parcel has a postal zone not above 35, so it is perishable. No. 3 While the given parcel is hazardous and likewise is not damaged and likewise is prepaid, so it is fragile. No. 4 While the given parcel is undeliverable, so it is not refrigerated. No. 5 While the given parcel is damaged, so it is rerouted. Question: Is the claim \"Kaveh is fragile\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015411", "pair_id": "u015411-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015411-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "31e76985a2b4bb3c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015434-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is allergic. Elif is fasting. Benedek is not ambulatory. Dorian is ambulatory. Dorian has a fever reading of 0. Elif has a pulse rate of 79. Dorian has a pulse rate of 26. Elif has a fever reading of 92. Dorian is fasting. Elif has a mobility rank of 66.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is ambulatory and has a fever reading above 29 and is allergic, then it is discharged. (2) If a patient is fasting and has a pulse rate of at least 27 and is allergic, then it is not contagious. (3) If a patient is fasting and has a pulse rate below 27, then it is contagious. (3) is void if the patient has a mobility rank of at least 64. (1) is void if the patient has a pulse rate below 54. Question: Is it true that Dorian is contagious?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015434", "pair_id": "u015434-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015434-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "eb0ea747f4922b07", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u015434-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is allergic. Elif is fasting. Benedek is not ambulatory. Dorian is ambulatory. Dorian has a fever reading of 0. Elif has a pulse rate of 79. Dorian has a pulse rate of 84. Elif has a fever reading of 92. Dorian is fasting. Elif has a mobility rank of 66.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is ambulatory and has a fever reading above 29 and is allergic, then it is discharged. (2) If a patient is fasting and has a pulse rate of at least 27 and is allergic, then it is not contagious. (3) If a patient is fasting and has a pulse rate below 27, then it is contagious. (3) is void if the patient has a mobility rank of at least 64. (1) is void if the patient has a pulse rate below 54. Question: Is it true that Dorian is contagious?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015434", "pair_id": "u015434-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015434-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "da22dc16f9d8b886", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u015487-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke has no collateral. Wiebke has no guarantor. Corin has a guarantor. Wiebke is not refinanced. Corin has no collateral. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 37.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is refinanced, it also is creditworthy. Clause 2: once any borrower is foreclosed, it also is overdrawn. Clause 3: once any borrower is refinanced, it also is bankrupt. Clause 4: once any borrower has collateral, it also is foreclosed. Clause 5: once any borrower is foreclosed, it also is not overdrawn. Clause 4 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a debt ratio over 69. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a debt ratio of 18 or more. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a guarantor. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a debt ratio under 18. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a guarantor. Question: Does it follow that Wiebke is overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015487", "pair_id": "u015487-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015487-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cc582aaf742b238b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015487-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke has no collateral. Wiebke has no guarantor. Corin has a guarantor. Wiebke is refinanced. Corin has no collateral. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 37.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is refinanced, it also is creditworthy. Clause 2: once any borrower is foreclosed, it also is overdrawn. Clause 3: once any borrower is refinanced, it also is bankrupt. Clause 4: once any borrower has collateral, it also is foreclosed. Clause 5: once any borrower is foreclosed, it also is not overdrawn. Clause 4 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a debt ratio over 69. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a debt ratio of 18 or more. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a guarantor. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a debt ratio under 18. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a guarantor. Question: Does it follow that Wiebke is overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015487", "pair_id": "u015487-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015487-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f4149e0e8220fb5a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015487-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke has no collateral. Wiebke has no guarantor. Corin has a guarantor. Wiebke is not refinanced. Corin has no collateral. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 37.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is refinanced, that borrower is creditworthy. Item B. When the borrower is foreclosed, that borrower is overdrawn. Item C. When the borrower is refinanced, that borrower is bankrupt. Item D. When the borrower has collateral, that borrower is foreclosed. Item E. When the borrower is foreclosed, that borrower is not overdrawn. Item D is suspended when the borrower has a debt ratio of more than 69. Item B is suspended when the borrower has a debt ratio of no less than 18. Item B is suspended when the borrower has a guarantor. Item E is suspended when the borrower has a debt ratio of less than 18. Item C is suspended when the borrower has a guarantor. Question: Can one infer that Wiebke is overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015487", "pair_id": "u015487-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015487-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cc582aaf742b238b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015487-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke has no collateral. Wiebke has no guarantor. Corin has a guarantor. Wiebke is refinanced. Corin has no collateral. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 37.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is refinanced, that borrower is creditworthy. Item B. When the borrower is foreclosed, that borrower is overdrawn. Item C. When the borrower is refinanced, that borrower is bankrupt. Item D. When the borrower has collateral, that borrower is foreclosed. Item E. When the borrower is foreclosed, that borrower is not overdrawn. Item D is suspended when the borrower has a debt ratio of more than 69. Item B is suspended when the borrower has a debt ratio of no less than 18. Item B is suspended when the borrower has a guarantor. Item E is suspended when the borrower has a debt ratio of less than 18. Item C is suspended when the borrower has a guarantor. Question: Can one infer that Wiebke is overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015487", "pair_id": "u015487-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015487-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f4149e0e8220fb5a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015528-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not flaky. Talc is flaky. Talc has a defect tally of 46. Feldspar is merged. Pumice has a lint backlog of 66. Talc is not backported. Feldspar has a patch cycle of 74. Feldspar has a defect tally of 95. Feldspar has a lint backlog of 41. Talc has a patch cycle of 43.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is reproducible, so it is profiled. No. 2 While the given build is merged and likewise is flaky and likewise is backported, so it is not linted. No. 3 While the given build is profiled and likewise is merged, so it is not versioned. No. 4 While the given build is flaky, so it is reproducible. No. 5 While the given build has a patch cycle that falls below 63, so it is experimental. No. 6 While the given build is profiled and likewise has a defect tally that exceeds 86 and likewise has a lint backlog that falls below 60, so it has no security advisory. No. 7 While the given build has a lint backlog that exceeds 79, so it is not experimental. No. 8 While the given build is profiled and likewise has a defect tally not above 86 and likewise is not backported, so it has a security advisory. No. 6 wins over No. 8. No. 7 wins over No. 5. Question: Is the claim \"Talc has a security advisory\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015528", "pair_id": "u015528-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015528-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4fb4f35908b6ee58", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u015528-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not flaky. Talc is flaky. Talc has a defect tally of 46. Feldspar is merged. Pumice has a lint backlog of 66. Talc is not backported. Feldspar has a patch cycle of 74. Feldspar has a defect tally of 95. Feldspar has a lint backlog of 41. Talc has a patch cycle of 43.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is reproducible, so it is profiled. No. 2 While the given build is merged and likewise is flaky and likewise is backported, so it is not linted. No. 3 While the given build is profiled and likewise is merged, so it is not versioned. No. 4 While the given build is flaky, so it is reproducible. No. 5 While the given build has a patch cycle that falls below 63, so it is experimental. No. 6 While the given build is profiled and likewise has a defect tally that exceeds 86 and likewise has a lint backlog that falls below 60, so it has no security advisory. No. 7 While the given build has a lint backlog that exceeds 79, so it is not experimental. No. 8 While the given build is profiled and likewise has a defect tally not above 86 and likewise is backported, so it has a security advisory. No. 6 wins over No. 8. No. 7 wins over No. 5. Question: Is the claim \"Talc has a security advisory\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015528", "pair_id": "u015528-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015528-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "af8b26df36afafd6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u015566-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a parcel volume of 14. Ulla is not tracked. Ulla is not labeled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume smaller than 41: then it is refrigerated. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is not labeled: then it has a courier. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume smaller than 13: then it is not refrigerated. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume higher than 61: then it is not hazardous. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is not stamped: then it is not rerouted. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is not labeled: then it is not damaged. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is not stamped: then it is rerouted. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is not tracked: then it is damaged. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is not hazardous: then it is stamped. Policy X. Suppose that parcel has a courier: then it is not stamped. Policy VIII is waived if that parcel has a parcel volume no higher than 42. Policy V is waived if that parcel has a parcel volume no lower than 21. Policy VII is waived if that parcel has a parcel volume smaller than 21. Policy I is waived if that parcel is consolidated. Policy IX is waived if that parcel is not weighed. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy VII. Question: Is it so that Ulla is not rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015566", "pair_id": "u015566-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015566-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b69e6f4ff074d4d4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u015566-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a parcel volume of 14. Ulla is not tracked. Ulla is not labeled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume smaller than 41: then it is refrigerated. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is not labeled: then it has a courier. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume smaller than 85: then it is not refrigerated. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume higher than 61: then it is not hazardous. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is not stamped: then it is not rerouted. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is not labeled: then it is not damaged. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is not stamped: then it is rerouted. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is not tracked: then it is damaged. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is not hazardous: then it is stamped. Policy X. Suppose that parcel has a courier: then it is not stamped. Policy VIII is waived if that parcel has a parcel volume no higher than 42. Policy V is waived if that parcel has a parcel volume no lower than 21. Policy VII is waived if that parcel has a parcel volume smaller than 21. Policy I is waived if that parcel is consolidated. Policy IX is waived if that parcel is not weighed. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy VII. Question: Is it so that Ulla is not rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015566", "pair_id": "u015566-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015566-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9b623f97bee6f08f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u015566-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a parcel volume of 14. Ulla is not tracked. Ulla is not labeled.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has a parcel volume less than 41, it then is refrigerated. #2 Each time a parcel is not labeled, it then has a courier. #3 Each time a parcel has a parcel volume less than 13, it then is not refrigerated. #4 Each time a parcel has a parcel volume greater than 61, it then is not hazardous. #5 Each time a parcel is not stamped, it then is not rerouted. #6 Each time a parcel is not labeled, it then is not damaged. #7 Each time a parcel is not stamped, it then is rerouted. #8 Each time a parcel is not tracked, it then is damaged. #9 Each time a parcel is not hazardous, it then is stamped. #10 Each time a parcel has a courier, it then is not stamped. #8 is set aside if a parcel has a parcel volume of 42 or below. #5 is set aside if a parcel has a parcel volume of 21 or above. #7 is set aside if a parcel has a parcel volume less than 21. #1 is set aside if a parcel is consolidated. #9 is set aside if a parcel is not weighed. #1 yields to #3. #6 yields to #8. #9 yields to #10. #7 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Ulla is not rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015566", "pair_id": "u015566-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015566-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b69e6f4ff074d4d4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u015566-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a parcel volume of 14. Ulla is not tracked. Ulla is not labeled.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has a parcel volume less than 41, it then is refrigerated. #2 Each time a parcel is not labeled, it then has a courier. #3 Each time a parcel has a parcel volume less than 85, it then is not refrigerated. #4 Each time a parcel has a parcel volume greater than 61, it then is not hazardous. #5 Each time a parcel is not stamped, it then is not rerouted. #6 Each time a parcel is not labeled, it then is not damaged. #7 Each time a parcel is not stamped, it then is rerouted. #8 Each time a parcel is not tracked, it then is damaged. #9 Each time a parcel is not hazardous, it then is stamped. #10 Each time a parcel has a courier, it then is not stamped. #8 is set aside if a parcel has a parcel volume of 42 or below. #5 is set aside if a parcel has a parcel volume of 21 or above. #7 is set aside if a parcel has a parcel volume less than 21. #1 is set aside if a parcel is consolidated. #9 is set aside if a parcel is not weighed. #1 yields to #3. #6 yields to #8. #9 yields to #10. #7 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Ulla is not rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015566", "pair_id": "u015566-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015566-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9b623f97bee6f08f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u015572-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb has no field site. Deneb has no ethics clearance. Deneb is not budgeted. Deneb has seed funding. Deneb is not theoretical. Deneb has a postdoc.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is collaborative provided that it has a field site. Section 2: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it is collaborative as well as has no postdoc as well as has seed funding. Section 3: a proposal is not peer reviewed provided that it is collaborative as well as has seed funding as well as is theoretical. Section 4: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it is budgeted as well as has ethics clearance. Question: Deneb is peer reviewed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015572", "pair_id": "u015572-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015572-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "219f5ee6dc128c6c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u015572-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb has no field site. Deneb has no ethics clearance. Deneb is not budgeted. Deneb has seed funding. Deneb is not theoretical. Deneb has a postdoc.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is collaborative provided that it has a field site. Section 2: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it is collaborative as well as has a postdoc as well as has seed funding. Section 3: a proposal is not peer reviewed provided that it is collaborative as well as has seed funding as well as is theoretical. Section 4: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it is budgeted as well as has ethics clearance. Question: Deneb is peer reviewed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015572", "pair_id": "u015572-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015572-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "6d97b4461da5e9b4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u015616-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not reimbursed. Celeste has no flood coverage. Edda is not reimbursed. Edda is not grandfathered. Edda is subrogated. Celeste is inspected. Celeste is not reinstated. Edda has flood coverage. Edda is reinstated. Celeste is not bundled. Celeste is subrogated. Celeste is covered. Edda is indemnified. Celeste is not grandfathered.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is not reinstated while is covered, thus it is retired. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it has an adjuster. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is reinstated while is inspected, thus it has no roadside assistance. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary while is bundled while is indemnified, thus it has no deductible waiver. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary while is not bundled while is not grandfathered, thus it has a deductible waiver. Provision 7: when the policyholder here has no roadside assistance while is subrogated, thus it has no beneficiary. Provision 8: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it is not retired. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Would it be right to say that Celeste has no deductible waiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015616", "pair_id": "u015616-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015616-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e85acb31bfa3dbdb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u015616-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not reimbursed. Celeste has no flood coverage. Edda is not reimbursed. Edda is not grandfathered. Edda is subrogated. Celeste is inspected. Celeste is not reinstated. Edda has flood coverage. Edda is reinstated. Celeste is not bundled. Celeste is subrogated. Celeste is covered. Edda is indemnified. Celeste is not grandfathered.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is reinstated while is covered, thus it is retired. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it has an adjuster. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is reinstated while is inspected, thus it has no roadside assistance. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary while is bundled while is indemnified, thus it has no deductible waiver. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary while is not bundled while is not grandfathered, thus it has a deductible waiver. Provision 7: when the policyholder here has no roadside assistance while is subrogated, thus it has no beneficiary. Provision 8: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it is not retired. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Would it be right to say that Celeste has no deductible waiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015616", "pair_id": "u015616-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015616-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1fea323fb7ec8ae7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u015616-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not reimbursed. Celeste has no flood coverage. Edda is not reimbursed. Edda is not grandfathered. Edda is subrogated. Celeste is inspected. Celeste is not reinstated. Edda has flood coverage. Edda is reinstated. Celeste is not bundled. Celeste is subrogated. Celeste is covered. Edda is indemnified. Celeste is not grandfathered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is not reinstated and further is covered, it thereby is retired. Point B. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby has an adjuster. Point C. If said policyholder is reinstated and further is inspected, it thereby has no roadside assistance. Point D. If said policyholder has a beneficiary and further is bundled and further is indemnified, it thereby has no deductible waiver. Point E. If said policyholder is retired, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point F. If said policyholder has a beneficiary and further is not bundled and further is not grandfathered, it thereby has a deductible waiver. Point G. If said policyholder has no roadside assistance and further is subrogated, it thereby has no beneficiary. Point H. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby is not retired. Point G supersedes Point E. Point F supersedes Point D. Point A supersedes Point H. Question: Statement: Celeste has no deductible waiver. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015616", "pair_id": "u015616-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015616-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e85acb31bfa3dbdb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u015616-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not reimbursed. Celeste has no flood coverage. Edda is not reimbursed. Edda is not grandfathered. Edda is subrogated. Celeste is inspected. Celeste is not reinstated. Edda has flood coverage. Edda is reinstated. Celeste is not bundled. Celeste is subrogated. Celeste is covered. Edda is indemnified. Celeste is not grandfathered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is reinstated and further is covered, it thereby is retired. Point B. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby has an adjuster. Point C. If said policyholder is reinstated and further is inspected, it thereby has no roadside assistance. Point D. If said policyholder has a beneficiary and further is bundled and further is indemnified, it thereby has no deductible waiver. Point E. If said policyholder is retired, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point F. If said policyholder has a beneficiary and further is not bundled and further is not grandfathered, it thereby has a deductible waiver. Point G. If said policyholder has no roadside assistance and further is subrogated, it thereby has no beneficiary. Point H. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby is not retired. Point G supersedes Point E. Point F supersedes Point D. Point A supersedes Point H. Question: Statement: Celeste has no deductible waiver. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015616", "pair_id": "u015616-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015616-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1fea323fb7ec8ae7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u015623-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hedda is certified. Hedda is not recommended. Rune has a portfolio. Rune has a background screening. Hedda is not interviewed. Rune is interviewed. Hedda has no background screening. Hedda is bilingual. Hedda is unionized. Hedda has no portfolio. Hedda is fingerprinted. Rune is not eligible.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a visa and likewise is eligible and likewise is recommended, so it is not relocating. No. 2 While the given candidate is certified and likewise is not interviewed, so it is freelance. No. 3 While the given candidate is bilingual and likewise is unionized and likewise is fingerprinted, so it has a visa. No. 4 While the given candidate has a background screening, so it is a graduate. No. 5 While the given candidate is relocating and likewise has a portfolio, so it is onboarded. No. 6 While the given candidate has a visa and likewise is unionized and likewise is freelance, so it is relocating. Question: Is the claim \"Hedda is not relocating\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015623", "pair_id": "u015623-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015623-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "f7e935c4a6ee9855", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u015623-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hedda is certified. Hedda is not recommended. Rune has a portfolio. Rune has a background screening. Hedda is not interviewed. Rune is interviewed. Hedda has no background screening. Hedda is bilingual. Hedda is unionized. Hedda has no portfolio. Hedda is fingerprinted. Rune is not eligible.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a visa and likewise is eligible and likewise is recommended, so it is not relocating. No. 2 While the given candidate is certified and likewise is interviewed, so it is freelance. No. 3 While the given candidate is bilingual and likewise is unionized and likewise is fingerprinted, so it has a visa. No. 4 While the given candidate has a background screening, so it is a graduate. No. 5 While the given candidate is relocating and likewise has a portfolio, so it is onboarded. No. 6 While the given candidate has a visa and likewise is unionized and likewise is freelance, so it is relocating. Question: Is the claim \"Hedda is not relocating\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015623", "pair_id": "u015623-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015623-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "e36d92dc4347ded5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u015660-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fabian is a smoker. Yara is a smoker. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 63. Fabian has a premium discount. Fabian has a beneficiary. Yara has a payout ceiling of 53. Yara has a premium discount. Fabian is not indemnified. Yara has a beneficiary. Yara is indemnified. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 18. Fabian is not retired. Celeste is not indemnified.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, and is retired, that policyholder has flood coverage. Item B. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of less than 21, that policyholder is a claimant. Item C. When the policyholder is reinstated, and has a payout ceiling of more than 10, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item D. When the policyholder has no premium discount, that policyholder is disputed. Item E. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, and is not retired, and is a smoker, that policyholder is bundled. Item F. When the policyholder is not indemnified, and has a beneficiary, that policyholder is reinstated. Question: What applies to Fabian?", "options": ["has flood coverage", "is bundled"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is bundled", "unit_id": "u015660", "pair_id": "u015660-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015660-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a5b646d6e494bb06", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015660-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fabian is a smoker. Yara is a smoker. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 63. Fabian has no premium discount. Fabian has a beneficiary. Yara has a payout ceiling of 53. Yara has a premium discount. Fabian is not indemnified. Yara has a beneficiary. Yara is indemnified. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 18. Fabian is not retired. Celeste is not indemnified.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, and is retired, that policyholder has flood coverage. Item B. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of less than 21, that policyholder is a claimant. Item C. When the policyholder is reinstated, and has a payout ceiling of more than 10, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item D. When the policyholder has no premium discount, that policyholder is disputed. Item E. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, and is not retired, and is a smoker, that policyholder is bundled. Item F. When the policyholder is not indemnified, and has a beneficiary, that policyholder is reinstated. Question: What applies to Fabian?", "options": ["has flood coverage", "is bundled"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is bundled", "unit_id": "u015660", "pair_id": "u015660-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015660-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "77e3ce9ba760fcbf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015682-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda is not sponsored. Lotte is not relocating. Jasna is not fingerprinted. Lotte is sponsored. Petra is a graduate. Jasna is not sponsored. Lotte is not fingerprinted. Hedda is freelance. Petra is not sponsored. Lotte is not seasoned. Petra is freelance. Hedda is probationary. Hedda is licensed. Petra is seasoned. Lotte is onboarded. Jasna is freelance. Lotte is a graduate. Hedda is a graduate. Lotte is probationary. Jasna is not licensed. Petra is not onboarded.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is not a graduate, then it is bonded. (2) If a candidate has no portfolio and is bonded, then it has a visa. (3) If a candidate is freelance, then it is not headhunted. (4) If a candidate is not fingerprinted and is not seasoned, then it has no portfolio. (5) If a candidate has no portfolio and is not freelance and is probationary, then it is headhunted. (6) If a candidate is licensed and is not probationary, then it is certified. (7) If a candidate has no portfolio and is sponsored and is probationary, then it is eligible. (8) If a candidate is bonded, then it is not eligible. (9) If a candidate is onboarded, then it is not bonded. (10) If a candidate is fingerprinted, then it has no diploma. (11) If a candidate is not sponsored, then it has a diploma. (12) If a candidate is not a graduate, then it is not certified. (11) is void if the candidate is sponsored. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. When (1) and (9) clash, (1) prevails. When (12) and (6) clash, (12) prevails. When (10) and (11) clash, (10) prevails. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Lotte?", "options": ["has a visa", "is headhunted", "is eligible"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is eligible", "unit_id": "u015682", "pair_id": "u015682-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/11/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015682-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6147061c46c11ad0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a12", "a9"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u015682-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda is not sponsored. Lotte is not relocating. Jasna is not fingerprinted. Lotte is sponsored. Petra is a graduate. Jasna is not sponsored. Lotte is not fingerprinted. Hedda is freelance. Petra is not sponsored. Lotte is not seasoned. Petra is freelance. Hedda is probationary. Hedda is licensed. Petra is seasoned. Lotte is onboarded. Jasna is freelance. Lotte is a graduate. Hedda is a graduate. Lotte is probationary. Jasna is not licensed. Petra is not onboarded.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is not a graduate, then it is bonded. (2) If a candidate has no portfolio and is bonded, then it has a visa. (3) If a candidate is freelance, then it is not headhunted. (4) If a candidate is not fingerprinted and is not seasoned, then it has no portfolio. (5) If a candidate has no portfolio and is not freelance and is probationary, then it is headhunted. (6) If a candidate is licensed and is not probationary, then it is certified. (7) If a candidate has no portfolio and is sponsored and is probationary, then it is eligible. (8) If a candidate is bonded, then it is not eligible. (9) If a candidate is onboarded, then it is not bonded. (10) If a candidate is fingerprinted, then it has no diploma. (11) If a candidate is not sponsored, then it has a diploma. (12) If a candidate is a graduate, then it is not certified. (11) is void if the candidate is sponsored. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. When (1) and (9) clash, (1) prevails. When (12) and (6) clash, (12) prevails. When (10) and (11) clash, (10) prevails. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Lotte?", "options": ["has a visa", "is headhunted", "is eligible"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is eligible", "unit_id": "u015682", "pair_id": "u015682-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/11/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015682-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6a9c4783f7c20f2e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a12", "a9"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u015682-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda is not sponsored. Lotte is not relocating. Jasna is not fingerprinted. Lotte is sponsored. Petra is a graduate. Jasna is not sponsored. Lotte is not fingerprinted. Hedda is freelance. Petra is not sponsored. Lotte is not seasoned. Petra is freelance. Hedda is probationary. Hedda is licensed. Petra is seasoned. Lotte is onboarded. Jasna is freelance. Lotte is a graduate. Hedda is a graduate. Lotte is probationary. Jasna is not licensed. Petra is not onboarded.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is not a graduate, it also is bonded. Clause 2: once any candidate has no portfolio and also is bonded, it also has a visa. Clause 3: once any candidate is freelance, it also is not headhunted. Clause 4: once any candidate is not fingerprinted and also is not seasoned, it also has no portfolio. Clause 5: once any candidate has no portfolio and also is not freelance and also is probationary, it also is headhunted. Clause 6: once any candidate is licensed and also is not probationary, it also is certified. Clause 7: once any candidate has no portfolio and also is sponsored and also is probationary, it also is eligible. Clause 8: once any candidate is bonded, it also is not eligible. Clause 9: once any candidate is onboarded, it also is not bonded. Clause 10: once any candidate is fingerprinted, it also has no diploma. Clause 11: once any candidate is not sponsored, it also has a diploma. Clause 12: once any candidate is not a graduate, it also is not certified. Clause 11 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is sponsored. Clause 8 overrides Clause 7. Clause 1 overrides Clause 9. Clause 12 overrides Clause 6. Clause 10 overrides Clause 11. Clause 3 overrides Clause 5. Question: Which of these is true of Lotte?", "options": ["has a visa", "is headhunted", "is eligible"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is eligible", "unit_id": "u015682", "pair_id": "u015682-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/11/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015682-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6147061c46c11ad0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a12", "a9"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u015682-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda is not sponsored. Lotte is not relocating. Jasna is not fingerprinted. Lotte is sponsored. Petra is a graduate. Jasna is not sponsored. Lotte is not fingerprinted. Hedda is freelance. Petra is not sponsored. Lotte is not seasoned. Petra is freelance. Hedda is probationary. Hedda is licensed. Petra is seasoned. Lotte is onboarded. Jasna is freelance. Lotte is a graduate. Hedda is a graduate. Lotte is probationary. Jasna is not licensed. Petra is not onboarded.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is not a graduate, it also is bonded. Clause 2: once any candidate has no portfolio and also is bonded, it also has a visa. Clause 3: once any candidate is freelance, it also is not headhunted. Clause 4: once any candidate is not fingerprinted and also is not seasoned, it also has no portfolio. Clause 5: once any candidate has no portfolio and also is not freelance and also is probationary, it also is headhunted. Clause 6: once any candidate is licensed and also is not probationary, it also is certified. Clause 7: once any candidate has no portfolio and also is sponsored and also is probationary, it also is eligible. Clause 8: once any candidate is bonded, it also is not eligible. Clause 9: once any candidate is onboarded, it also is not bonded. Clause 10: once any candidate is fingerprinted, it also has no diploma. Clause 11: once any candidate is not sponsored, it also has a diploma. Clause 12: once any candidate is a graduate, it also is not certified. Clause 11 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is sponsored. Clause 8 overrides Clause 7. Clause 1 overrides Clause 9. Clause 12 overrides Clause 6. Clause 10 overrides Clause 11. Clause 3 overrides Clause 5. Question: Which of these is true of Lotte?", "options": ["has a visa", "is headhunted", "is eligible"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is eligible", "unit_id": "u015682", "pair_id": "u015682-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/11/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015682-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6a9c4783f7c20f2e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a12", "a9"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u015700-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ivo has a commute radius of 98. Ivo has no background screening. Petra is eligible. Petra has no background screening. Ivo is not certified. Petra is not certified. Petra is not fingerprinted. Ivo is not eligible. Ivo is not fingerprinted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is unionized while has no background screening while is not eligible, thus it has a diploma. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a signing bonus, thus it is unionized. Provision 3: when the candidate here is unionized while is eligible, thus it is headhunted. Provision 4: when the candidate here is not fingerprinted, thus it is not probationary. Provision 5: when the candidate here is unionized while is not eligible while is certified, thus it has a mentor. Provision 6: when the candidate here has a commute radius at or above 87, thus it has a signing bonus. Provision 7: when the candidate here is eligible while has a background screening, thus it is seasoned. Provision 8: when the candidate here is unionized while has a background screening while is seasoned, thus it is a veteran. Question: Which one describes Ivo?", "options": ["is headhunted", "has a diploma", "is a veteran", "has a mentor"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a diploma", "unit_id": "u015700", "pair_id": "u015700-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015700-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e043158226834703", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a2", "a3", "a8"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u015700-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ivo has a commute radius of 98. Ivo has no background screening. Petra is eligible. Petra has no background screening. Ivo is not certified. Petra is not certified. Petra is not fingerprinted. Ivo is not eligible. Ivo is fingerprinted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is unionized while has no background screening while is not eligible, thus it has a diploma. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a signing bonus, thus it is unionized. Provision 3: when the candidate here is unionized while is eligible, thus it is headhunted. Provision 4: when the candidate here is not fingerprinted, thus it is not probationary. Provision 5: when the candidate here is unionized while is not eligible while is certified, thus it has a mentor. Provision 6: when the candidate here has a commute radius at or above 87, thus it has a signing bonus. Provision 7: when the candidate here is eligible while has a background screening, thus it is seasoned. Provision 8: when the candidate here is unionized while has a background screening while is seasoned, thus it is a veteran. Question: Which one describes Ivo?", "options": ["is headhunted", "has a diploma", "is a veteran", "has a mentor"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a diploma", "unit_id": "u015700", "pair_id": "u015700-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015700-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "c9dd2dd7f263537e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a2", "a3", "a8"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u015706-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut has no patent filing. Fomalhaut is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse is not longitudinal. Mirach has no patent filing. Capella has no patent filing. Capella is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is longitudinal, then it has industry backing. (2) If a proposal is resubmitted, then it has no ethics clearance. (3) If a proposal is budgeted, then it has ethics clearance. (4) If a proposal has no patent filing, then it is translational. (5) If a proposal is a pilot study, then it is cofunded. (6) If a proposal has industry backing, then it is resubmitted. (7) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is budgeted. Question: Is it true that Capella has no ethics clearance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015706", "pair_id": "u015706-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015706-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "a53be9bc014864b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015706-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut has no patent filing. Fomalhaut is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse is not longitudinal. Mirach has no patent filing. Capella has no patent filing. Capella is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is longitudinal, then it has industry backing. (2) If a proposal is resubmitted, then it has no ethics clearance. (3) If a proposal is budgeted, then it has ethics clearance. (4) If a proposal has a patent filing, then it is translational. (5) If a proposal is a pilot study, then it is cofunded. (6) If a proposal has industry backing, then it is resubmitted. (7) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is budgeted. Question: Is it true that Capella has no ethics clearance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015706", "pair_id": "u015706-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015706-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "05c39ed2b5800f4d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015721-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hedda has no mentor. Petra is onboarded. Hedda is relocating. Hedda has no diploma. Petra has no signing bonus. Petra has no diploma. Hedda is not onboarded. Hedda is not unionized. Petra has a mentor. Hedda has a signing bonus. Petra is not unionized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has no diploma while is relocating, thus it is interviewed. Provision 2: when the candidate here has no diploma while is relocating, thus it is not interviewed. Provision 3: when the candidate here has no diploma, thus it is not freelance. Provision 4: when the candidate here is not onboarded, thus it is freelance. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here has no signing bonus while is unionized. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is bilingual while has a mentor. Provision 4 has no effect when the candidate here is not bilingual. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Hedda is interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015721", "pair_id": "u015721-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015721-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6ed3de3bafacbeaf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015721-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hedda has no mentor. Petra is onboarded. Hedda is relocating. Hedda has no diploma. Petra has no signing bonus. Petra has no diploma. Hedda is not onboarded. Hedda is not unionized. Petra has a mentor. Hedda has a signing bonus. Petra is not unionized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has no diploma while is relocating, thus it is interviewed. Provision 2: when the candidate here has no diploma while is not relocating, thus it is not interviewed. Provision 3: when the candidate here has no diploma, thus it is not freelance. Provision 4: when the candidate here is not onboarded, thus it is freelance. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here has no signing bonus while is unionized. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is bilingual while has a mentor. Provision 4 has no effect when the candidate here is not bilingual. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Hedda is interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015721", "pair_id": "u015721-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015721-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0e59deeb23ca4ec4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015721-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hedda has no mentor. Petra is onboarded. Hedda is relocating. Hedda has no diploma. Petra has no signing bonus. Petra has no diploma. Hedda is not onboarded. Hedda is not unionized. Petra has a mentor. Hedda has a signing bonus. Petra is not unionized.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has no diploma and likewise is relocating, so it is interviewed. No. 2 While the given candidate has no diploma and likewise is relocating, so it is not interviewed. No. 3 While the given candidate has no diploma, so it is not freelance. No. 4 While the given candidate is not onboarded, so it is freelance. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate has no signing bonus and likewise is unionized. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is bilingual and likewise has a mentor. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given candidate is not bilingual. No. 4 wins over No. 3. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Hedda is interviewed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015721", "pair_id": "u015721-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015721-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6ed3de3bafacbeaf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015721-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hedda has no mentor. Petra is onboarded. Hedda is relocating. Hedda has no diploma. Petra has no signing bonus. Petra has no diploma. Hedda is not onboarded. Hedda is not unionized. Petra has a mentor. Hedda has a signing bonus. Petra is not unionized.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has no diploma and likewise is relocating, so it is interviewed. No. 2 While the given candidate has no diploma and likewise is not relocating, so it is not interviewed. No. 3 While the given candidate has no diploma, so it is not freelance. No. 4 While the given candidate is not onboarded, so it is freelance. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate has no signing bonus and likewise is unionized. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is bilingual and likewise has a mentor. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given candidate is not bilingual. No. 4 wins over No. 3. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Hedda is interviewed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u015721", "pair_id": "u015721-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015721-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0e59deeb23ca4ec4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015723-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is bonded. Kalle is bilingual. Kalle is bonded. Olek is not sponsored. Rune is not bilingual. Kalle is not sponsored.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is bonded, it then is freelance. #2 Each time a candidate is bonded, it then is not seasoned. #3 Each time a candidate is sponsored, it then is seasoned. #1 is set aside if a candidate is bonded. #2 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Mads is bilingual?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015723", "pair_id": "u015723-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015723-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "877455a288ad34e1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015723-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is bonded. Mads is not bonded. Kalle is bilingual. Kalle is bonded. Olek is not sponsored. Rune is not bilingual. Kalle is not sponsored.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is bonded, it then is freelance. #2 Each time a candidate is bonded, it then is not seasoned. #3 Each time a candidate is sponsored, it then is seasoned. #1 is set aside if a candidate is bonded. #2 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Mads is bilingual?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015723", "pair_id": "u015723-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015723-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e84f0fd7a93f1623", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015738-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has no feature toggle. Basalt is benchmarked. Galena has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it is localized. Provision 2: when the build here is benchmarked, thus it is not documented. Question: Would it be right to say that Basalt is tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015738", "pair_id": "u015738-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015738-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "1d65fc071263bae4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015738-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has a feature toggle. Basalt is benchmarked. Galena has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it is localized. Provision 2: when the build here is benchmarked, thus it is not documented. Question: Would it be right to say that Basalt is tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015738", "pair_id": "u015738-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015738-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "487dfc75d201c2e6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015738-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has no feature toggle. Basalt is benchmarked. Galena has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a feature toggle, it thereby is localized. Point B. If said build is benchmarked, it thereby is not documented. Question: Statement: Basalt is tagged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015738", "pair_id": "u015738-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015738-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "1d65fc071263bae4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015738-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has a feature toggle. Basalt is benchmarked. Galena has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a feature toggle, it thereby is localized. Point B. If said build is benchmarked, it thereby is not documented. Question: Statement: Basalt is tagged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015738", "pair_id": "u015738-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015738-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "487dfc75d201c2e6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015738-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has no feature toggle. Basalt is benchmarked. Galena has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a feature toggle, so it is localized. No. 2 While the given build is benchmarked, so it is not documented. Question: Is the claim \"Basalt is tagged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015738", "pair_id": "u015738-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015738-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "1d65fc071263bae4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015738-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has a feature toggle. Basalt is benchmarked. Galena has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a feature toggle, so it is localized. No. 2 While the given build is benchmarked, so it is not documented. Question: Is the claim \"Basalt is tagged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015738", "pair_id": "u015738-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015738-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "487dfc75d201c2e6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015823-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has a premium discount. Una is not litigated. Agata is indemnified. Agata has a premium discount. Viggo is not disputed. Una has a dashcam. Una is not indemnified. Yara is not disputed. Yara is litigated. Una is covered. Una has no premium discount. Viggo is not covered.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a premium discount, thus it has no deductible waiver. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a premium discount while is indemnified, thus it is bundled. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is lapsed while has a dashcam while is covered, thus it is retired. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is lapsed while is covered while is litigated, thus it is not retired. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is bundled while is indemnified, thus it is lapsed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is disputed while is litigated, thus it has flood coverage. Question: Would it be right to say that Una is retired?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015823", "pair_id": "u015823-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015823-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "59e4e9e8eb9e4e4f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u015823-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has a premium discount. Una is not litigated. Agata is indemnified. Agata has a premium discount. Viggo is not disputed. Una has a dashcam. Una is not indemnified. Yara is not disputed. Yara is litigated. Una is covered. Una has a premium discount. Viggo is not covered.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a premium discount, thus it has no deductible waiver. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a premium discount while is indemnified, thus it is bundled. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is lapsed while has a dashcam while is covered, thus it is retired. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is lapsed while is covered while is litigated, thus it is not retired. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is bundled while is indemnified, thus it is lapsed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is disputed while is litigated, thus it has flood coverage. Question: Would it be right to say that Una is retired?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015823", "pair_id": "u015823-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015823-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "e4c687cb55003cbd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u015823-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has a premium discount. Una is not litigated. Agata is indemnified. Agata has a premium discount. Viggo is not disputed. Una has a dashcam. Una is not indemnified. Yara is not disputed. Yara is litigated. Una is covered. Una has no premium discount. Viggo is not covered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby has no deductible waiver. Point B. If said policyholder has a premium discount and further is indemnified, it thereby is bundled. Point C. If said policyholder is lapsed and further has a dashcam and further is covered, it thereby is retired. Point D. If said policyholder is lapsed and further is covered and further is litigated, it thereby is not retired. Point E. If said policyholder is bundled and further is indemnified, it thereby is lapsed. Point F. If said policyholder is disputed and further is litigated, it thereby has flood coverage. Question: Statement: Una is retired. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015823", "pair_id": "u015823-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015823-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "59e4e9e8eb9e4e4f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u015823-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has a premium discount. Una is not litigated. Agata is indemnified. Agata has a premium discount. Viggo is not disputed. Una has a dashcam. Una is not indemnified. Yara is not disputed. Yara is litigated. Una is covered. Una has a premium discount. Viggo is not covered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby has no deductible waiver. Point B. If said policyholder has a premium discount and further is indemnified, it thereby is bundled. Point C. If said policyholder is lapsed and further has a dashcam and further is covered, it thereby is retired. Point D. If said policyholder is lapsed and further is covered and further is litigated, it thereby is not retired. Point E. If said policyholder is bundled and further is indemnified, it thereby is lapsed. Point F. If said policyholder is disputed and further is litigated, it thereby has flood coverage. Question: Statement: Una is retired. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015823", "pair_id": "u015823-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015823-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "e4c687cb55003cbd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u015823-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has a premium discount. Una is not litigated. Agata is indemnified. Agata has a premium discount. Viggo is not disputed. Una has a dashcam. Una is not indemnified. Yara is not disputed. Yara is litigated. Una is covered. Una has no premium discount. Viggo is not covered.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a premium discount, so it has no deductible waiver. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a premium discount and likewise is indemnified, so it is bundled. No. 3 While the given policyholder is lapsed and likewise has a dashcam and likewise is covered, so it is retired. No. 4 While the given policyholder is lapsed and likewise is covered and likewise is litigated, so it is not retired. No. 5 While the given policyholder is bundled and likewise is indemnified, so it is lapsed. No. 6 While the given policyholder is disputed and likewise is litigated, so it has flood coverage. Question: Is the claim \"Una is retired\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015823", "pair_id": "u015823-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015823-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "59e4e9e8eb9e4e4f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u015823-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has a premium discount. Una is not litigated. Agata is indemnified. Agata has a premium discount. Viggo is not disputed. Una has a dashcam. Una is not indemnified. Yara is not disputed. Yara is litigated. Una is covered. Una has a premium discount. Viggo is not covered.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a premium discount, so it has no deductible waiver. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a premium discount and likewise is indemnified, so it is bundled. No. 3 While the given policyholder is lapsed and likewise has a dashcam and likewise is covered, so it is retired. No. 4 While the given policyholder is lapsed and likewise is covered and likewise is litigated, so it is not retired. No. 5 While the given policyholder is bundled and likewise is indemnified, so it is lapsed. No. 6 While the given policyholder is disputed and likewise is litigated, so it has flood coverage. Question: Is the claim \"Una is retired\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015823", "pair_id": "u015823-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u015823-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "e4c687cb55003cbd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u015826-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is deprecated. Cobalt has no failover node. Cobalt has no GPU. Cobalt has no dedicated host. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra has a GPU. Sierra is sharded. Sierra is deprecated. Halcyon has a GPU.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is deprecated while is sharded while has a dedicated host, thus it is idle. Provision 2: when the workload here has a GPU, thus it is not provisioned. Provision 3: when the workload here has a failover node, thus it is provisioned. Provision 4: when the workload here is deprecated while has a dedicated host while has a failover node, thus it is not idle. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Sierra is idle?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015826", "pair_id": "u015826-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015826-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "70f85af21860e73c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015826-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is deprecated. Cobalt has no failover node. Cobalt has no GPU. Cobalt has no dedicated host. Sierra has a dedicated host. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra has a GPU. Sierra is sharded. Sierra is deprecated. Halcyon has a GPU.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is deprecated while is sharded while has a dedicated host, thus it is idle. Provision 2: when the workload here has a GPU, thus it is not provisioned. Provision 3: when the workload here has a failover node, thus it is provisioned. Provision 4: when the workload here is deprecated while has a dedicated host while has a failover node, thus it is not idle. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Sierra is idle?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015826", "pair_id": "u015826-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015826-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "12bf5fe4e58ce350", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015826-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is deprecated. Cobalt has no failover node. Cobalt has no GPU. Cobalt has no dedicated host. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra has a GPU. Sierra is sharded. Sierra is deprecated. Halcyon has a GPU.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is deprecated and further is sharded and further has a dedicated host, it thereby is idle. Point B. If said workload has a GPU, it thereby is not provisioned. Point C. If said workload has a failover node, it thereby is provisioned. Point D. If said workload is deprecated and further has a dedicated host and further has a failover node, it thereby is not idle. Point B supersedes Point C. Point D supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Sierra is idle. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015826", "pair_id": "u015826-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015826-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "70f85af21860e73c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015826-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is deprecated. Cobalt has no failover node. Cobalt has no GPU. Cobalt has no dedicated host. Sierra has a dedicated host. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra has a GPU. Sierra is sharded. Sierra is deprecated. Halcyon has a GPU.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is deprecated and further is sharded and further has a dedicated host, it thereby is idle. Point B. If said workload has a GPU, it thereby is not provisioned. Point C. If said workload has a failover node, it thereby is provisioned. Point D. If said workload is deprecated and further has a dedicated host and further has a failover node, it thereby is not idle. Point B supersedes Point C. Point D supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Sierra is idle. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015826", "pair_id": "u015826-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015826-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "12bf5fe4e58ce350", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015826-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is deprecated. Cobalt has no failover node. Cobalt has no GPU. Cobalt has no dedicated host. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra has a GPU. Sierra is sharded. Sierra is deprecated. Halcyon has a GPU.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is deprecated and likewise is sharded and likewise has a dedicated host, so it is idle. No. 2 While the given workload has a GPU, so it is not provisioned. No. 3 While the given workload has a failover node, so it is provisioned. No. 4 While the given workload is deprecated and likewise has a dedicated host and likewise has a failover node, so it is not idle. No. 2 wins over No. 3. No. 4 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Sierra is idle\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015826", "pair_id": "u015826-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015826-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "70f85af21860e73c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015826-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is deprecated. Cobalt has no failover node. Cobalt has no GPU. Cobalt has no dedicated host. Sierra has a dedicated host. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra has a GPU. Sierra is sharded. Sierra is deprecated. Halcyon has a GPU.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is deprecated and likewise is sharded and likewise has a dedicated host, so it is idle. No. 2 While the given workload has a GPU, so it is not provisioned. No. 3 While the given workload has a failover node, so it is provisioned. No. 4 While the given workload is deprecated and likewise has a dedicated host and likewise has a failover node, so it is not idle. No. 2 wins over No. 3. No. 4 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Sierra is idle\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015826", "pair_id": "u015826-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015826-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "12bf5fe4e58ce350", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015871-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren is not a homeowner. Evren is delinquent. Hamid is delinquent. Tomas is a homeowner. Hamid is not bankrupt. Wiebke is bankrupt. Tomas is bankrupt. Evren has no lien. Hamid has no lien. Tomas is pensioned. Tomas is audited. Evren is pensioned. Hamid is pensioned. Wiebke is not pensioned. Tomas has no lien.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower has a lien, then it is refinanced. (2) If a borrower is solvent and is audited, then it has collateral. (3) If a borrower is solvent and is delinquent and is audited, then it is vetted. (4) If a borrower is pensioned, then it is creditworthy. (5) If a borrower is delinquent, then it has an escrow account. (6) If a borrower is solvent and is bankrupt, then it has a mortgage. (7) If a borrower is creditworthy and is pensioned and is a homeowner, then it is solvent. (6) is void if the borrower is audited. (1) is void if the borrower is delinquent. Question: Which option holds for Tomas?", "options": ["has collateral", "is vetted", "has a mortgage"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u015871", "pair_id": "u015871-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015871-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f640337bb613bd3b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a8", "a10"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u015871-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren is not a homeowner. Evren is delinquent. Hamid is delinquent. Tomas is a homeowner. Hamid is not bankrupt. Wiebke is bankrupt. Tomas is bankrupt. Evren has no lien. Hamid has no lien. Tomas is pensioned. Tomas is not audited. Evren is pensioned. Hamid is pensioned. Wiebke is not pensioned. Tomas has no lien.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower has a lien, then it is refinanced. (2) If a borrower is solvent and is audited, then it has collateral. (3) If a borrower is solvent and is delinquent and is audited, then it is vetted. (4) If a borrower is pensioned, then it is creditworthy. (5) If a borrower is delinquent, then it has an escrow account. (6) If a borrower is solvent and is bankrupt, then it has a mortgage. (7) If a borrower is creditworthy and is pensioned and is a homeowner, then it is solvent. (6) is void if the borrower is audited. (1) is void if the borrower is delinquent. Question: Which option holds for Tomas?", "options": ["has collateral", "is vetted", "has a mortgage"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a mortgage", "unit_id": "u015871", "pair_id": "u015871-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015871-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2fd01b450589835f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a8", "a10"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u015871-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren is not a homeowner. Evren is delinquent. Hamid is delinquent. Tomas is a homeowner. Hamid is not bankrupt. Wiebke is bankrupt. Tomas is bankrupt. Evren has no lien. Hamid has no lien. Tomas is pensioned. Tomas is audited. Evren is pensioned. Hamid is pensioned. Wiebke is not pensioned. Tomas has no lien.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a lien, it also is refinanced. Clause 2: once any borrower is solvent and also is audited, it also has collateral. Clause 3: once any borrower is solvent and also is delinquent and also is audited, it also is vetted. Clause 4: once any borrower is pensioned, it also is creditworthy. Clause 5: once any borrower is delinquent, it also has an escrow account. Clause 6: once any borrower is solvent and also is bankrupt, it also has a mortgage. Clause 7: once any borrower is creditworthy and also is pensioned and also is a homeowner, it also is solvent. Clause 6 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is audited. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is delinquent. Question: Which of these is true of Tomas?", "options": ["has collateral", "is vetted", "has a mortgage"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u015871", "pair_id": "u015871-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015871-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f640337bb613bd3b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a8", "a10"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u015871-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren is not a homeowner. Evren is delinquent. Hamid is delinquent. Tomas is a homeowner. Hamid is not bankrupt. Wiebke is bankrupt. Tomas is bankrupt. Evren has no lien. Hamid has no lien. Tomas is pensioned. Tomas is not audited. Evren is pensioned. Hamid is pensioned. Wiebke is not pensioned. Tomas has no lien.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a lien, it also is refinanced. Clause 2: once any borrower is solvent and also is audited, it also has collateral. Clause 3: once any borrower is solvent and also is delinquent and also is audited, it also is vetted. Clause 4: once any borrower is pensioned, it also is creditworthy. Clause 5: once any borrower is delinquent, it also has an escrow account. Clause 6: once any borrower is solvent and also is bankrupt, it also has a mortgage. Clause 7: once any borrower is creditworthy and also is pensioned and also is a homeowner, it also is solvent. Clause 6 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is audited. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is delinquent. Question: Which of these is true of Tomas?", "options": ["has collateral", "is vetted", "has a mortgage"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a mortgage", "unit_id": "u015871", "pair_id": "u015871-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015871-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2fd01b450589835f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a8", "a10"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u015882-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is relocating. Olek is not sponsored. Ivo has a seniority step of 44. Olek has a notice period of 71. Ivo is not relocating. Ivo is not licensed. Ivo is sponsored. Olek is onboarded. Ivo has a commute radius of 90. Olek is not recommended. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 8. Olek is licensed. Olek has a commute radius of 52. Olek is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is interviewed provided that it has a visa as well as is relocating. Section 2: a candidate is not interviewed provided that it has a visa as well as is not relocating as well as is not onboarded. Section 3: a candidate is a veteran provided that it is sponsored as well as is licensed as well as is recommended. Section 4: a candidate has a visa provided that it has no mentor as well as is not recommended. Section 5: a candidate has no diploma provided that it has a seniority step of 16 or lower as well as is bilingual. Section 6: a candidate has a signing bonus provided that it has a visa as well as has a commute radius of 78 or lower. Section 7: a candidate has no mentor provided that it has an aptitude quotient lower than 7. Section 3 lapses for a candidate if it is not recommended. Section 1 lapses for a candidate if it has a seniority step of 88 or higher. Section 2 lapses for a candidate if it has a notice period lower than 18. Section 6 lapses for a candidate if it is recommended. Question: Olek is not interviewed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015882", "pair_id": "u015882-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015882-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "384d16c62a3d99cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u015882-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is relocating. Olek is not sponsored. Ivo has a seniority step of 44. Olek has a notice period of 71. Ivo is not relocating. Ivo is not licensed. Ivo is sponsored. Olek is onboarded. Ivo has a commute radius of 90. Olek is not recommended. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 8. Olek is licensed. Olek has a commute radius of 52. Olek is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is interviewed provided that it has a visa as well as is relocating. Section 2: a candidate is not interviewed provided that it has a visa as well as is not relocating as well as is not onboarded. Section 3: a candidate is a veteran provided that it is sponsored as well as is licensed as well as is recommended. Section 4: a candidate has a visa provided that it has no mentor as well as is not recommended. Section 5: a candidate has no diploma provided that it has a seniority step of 16 or lower as well as is bilingual. Section 6: a candidate has a signing bonus provided that it has a visa as well as has a commute radius of 78 or lower. Section 7: a candidate has no mentor provided that it has an aptitude quotient lower than 24. Section 3 lapses for a candidate if it is not recommended. Section 1 lapses for a candidate if it has a seniority step of 88 or higher. Section 2 lapses for a candidate if it has a notice period lower than 18. Section 6 lapses for a candidate if it is recommended. Question: Olek is not interviewed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015882", "pair_id": "u015882-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015882-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "09be40c59d6ca94b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u015882-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is relocating. Olek is not sponsored. Ivo has a seniority step of 44. Olek has a notice period of 71. Ivo is not relocating. Ivo is not licensed. Ivo is sponsored. Olek is onboarded. Ivo has a commute radius of 90. Olek is not recommended. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 8. Olek is licensed. Olek has a commute radius of 52. Olek is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a visa plus is relocating: then it is interviewed. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a visa plus is not relocating plus is not onboarded: then it is not interviewed. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is sponsored plus is licensed plus is recommended: then it is a veteran. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has no mentor plus is not recommended: then it has a visa. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step no higher than 16 plus is bilingual: then it has no diploma. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate has a visa plus has a commute radius no higher than 78: then it has a signing bonus. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate has an aptitude quotient smaller than 7: then it has no mentor. Policy III is waived if that candidate is not recommended. Policy I is waived if that candidate has a seniority step no lower than 88. Policy II is waived if that candidate has a notice period smaller than 18. Policy VI is waived if that candidate is recommended. Question: Is it so that Olek is not interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015882", "pair_id": "u015882-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015882-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "384d16c62a3d99cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u015882-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is relocating. Olek is not sponsored. Ivo has a seniority step of 44. Olek has a notice period of 71. Ivo is not relocating. Ivo is not licensed. Ivo is sponsored. Olek is onboarded. Ivo has a commute radius of 90. Olek is not recommended. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 8. Olek is licensed. Olek has a commute radius of 52. Olek is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a visa plus is relocating: then it is interviewed. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a visa plus is not relocating plus is not onboarded: then it is not interviewed. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is sponsored plus is licensed plus is recommended: then it is a veteran. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has no mentor plus is not recommended: then it has a visa. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step no higher than 16 plus is bilingual: then it has no diploma. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate has a visa plus has a commute radius no higher than 78: then it has a signing bonus. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate has an aptitude quotient smaller than 24: then it has no mentor. Policy III is waived if that candidate is not recommended. Policy I is waived if that candidate has a seniority step no lower than 88. Policy II is waived if that candidate has a notice period smaller than 18. Policy VI is waived if that candidate is recommended. Question: Is it so that Olek is not interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015882", "pair_id": "u015882-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015882-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "09be40c59d6ca94b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u015882-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is relocating. Olek is not sponsored. Ivo has a seniority step of 44. Olek has a notice period of 71. Ivo is not relocating. Ivo is not licensed. Ivo is sponsored. Olek is onboarded. Ivo has a commute radius of 90. Olek is not recommended. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 8. Olek is licensed. Olek has a commute radius of 52. Olek is not bilingual.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has a visa and additionally is relocating, it then is interviewed. #2 Each time a candidate has a visa and additionally is not relocating and additionally is not onboarded, it then is not interviewed. #3 Each time a candidate is sponsored and additionally is licensed and additionally is recommended, it then is a veteran. #4 Each time a candidate has no mentor and additionally is not recommended, it then has a visa. #5 Each time a candidate has a seniority step of 16 or below and additionally is bilingual, it then has no diploma. #6 Each time a candidate has a visa and additionally has a commute radius of 78 or below, it then has a signing bonus. #7 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient less than 7, it then has no mentor. #3 is set aside if a candidate is not recommended. #1 is set aside if a candidate has a seniority step of 88 or above. #2 is set aside if a candidate has a notice period less than 18. #6 is set aside if a candidate is recommended. Question: Do the terms above show that Olek is not interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015882", "pair_id": "u015882-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015882-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "384d16c62a3d99cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u015882-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is relocating. Olek is not sponsored. Ivo has a seniority step of 44. Olek has a notice period of 71. Ivo is not relocating. Ivo is not licensed. Ivo is sponsored. Olek is onboarded. Ivo has a commute radius of 90. Olek is not recommended. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 8. Olek is licensed. Olek has a commute radius of 52. Olek is not bilingual.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has a visa and additionally is relocating, it then is interviewed. #2 Each time a candidate has a visa and additionally is not relocating and additionally is not onboarded, it then is not interviewed. #3 Each time a candidate is sponsored and additionally is licensed and additionally is recommended, it then is a veteran. #4 Each time a candidate has no mentor and additionally is not recommended, it then has a visa. #5 Each time a candidate has a seniority step of 16 or below and additionally is bilingual, it then has no diploma. #6 Each time a candidate has a visa and additionally has a commute radius of 78 or below, it then has a signing bonus. #7 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient less than 24, it then has no mentor. #3 is set aside if a candidate is not recommended. #1 is set aside if a candidate has a seniority step of 88 or above. #2 is set aside if a candidate has a notice period less than 18. #6 is set aside if a candidate is recommended. Question: Do the terms above show that Olek is not interviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015882", "pair_id": "u015882-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015882-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "09be40c59d6ca94b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u015932-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata has roadside assistance. Yara has roadside assistance. Fabian has no premium discount. Yara has a peril factor of 1. Agata has a premium discount. Fabian has no roadside assistance.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a premium discount, so it is a claimant. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a peril factor not above 31, so it has an adjuster. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not grandfathered, so it is not covered. No. 4 While the given policyholder is not subrogated, so it is covered. No. 5 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it has a beneficiary. No. 6 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is not subrogated. Question: Is the claim \"Yara is covered\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u015932", "pair_id": "u015932-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015932-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e4dd3c8296848702", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015932-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata has roadside assistance. Yara has roadside assistance. Fabian has no premium discount. Yara has a peril factor of 1. Agata has a premium discount. Fabian has no roadside assistance.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a premium discount, so it is a claimant. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a peril factor not above 31, so it has an adjuster. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not grandfathered, so it is not covered. No. 4 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is not grandfathered. No. 5 While the given policyholder is not subrogated, so it is covered. No. 6 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it has a beneficiary. No. 7 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is not subrogated. Question: Is the claim \"Yara is covered\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u015932", "pair_id": "u015932-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015932-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "34429a03eee42e24", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015942-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ilse has no collateral.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is not bankrupt, it then has a mortgage. #2 Each time a borrower is a depositor, it then is a homeowner. #3 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is prequalified. #4 Each time a borrower is not vetted, it then is pensioned. #5 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then is a depositor. #6 Each time a borrower is not amortized, it then is employed. #7 Each time a borrower has no collateral, it then is foreclosed. #8 Each time a borrower is employed, it then is not bankrupt. #9 Each time a borrower has a debt ratio of 34 or below, it then is overdrawn. #10 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then is not a homeowner. #11 Each time a borrower is prequalified, it then is underwritten. #11 is set aside if a borrower has no collateral. #1 is set aside if a borrower has a debt ratio of 85 or above. #10 yields to #2. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Ilse?", "options": ["has a mortgage", "is a homeowner", "is underwritten"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a homeowner", "unit_id": "u015942", "pair_id": "u015942-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015942-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "982ff6d620064c04", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a2", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015942-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ilse has no collateral. Ilse has a debt ratio of 18.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is not bankrupt, it then has a mortgage. #2 Each time a borrower is a depositor, it then is a homeowner. #3 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is prequalified. #4 Each time a borrower is not vetted, it then is pensioned. #5 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then is a depositor. #6 Each time a borrower is not amortized, it then is employed. #7 Each time a borrower has no collateral, it then is foreclosed. #8 Each time a borrower is employed, it then is not bankrupt. #9 Each time a borrower has a debt ratio of 34 or below, it then is overdrawn. #10 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then is not a homeowner. #11 Each time a borrower is prequalified, it then is underwritten. #11 is set aside if a borrower has no collateral. #1 is set aside if a borrower has a debt ratio of 85 or above. #10 yields to #2. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Ilse?", "options": ["has a mortgage", "is a homeowner", "is underwritten"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a homeowner", "unit_id": "u015942", "pair_id": "u015942-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015942-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9ddc80f6350d7dc1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a2", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u015995-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xaver has a dashcam. Xaver is covered. Edda is not a claimant. Edda has a rider. Xaver is not a claimant. Xaver has a rider. Xaver is not bundled.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is bundled, that policyholder has no roadside assistance. Item B. When the policyholder has a dashcam, that policyholder has an adjuster. Item C. When the policyholder is bundled, that policyholder is disputed. Item D. When the policyholder is not covered, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item E. When the policyholder is a claimant, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item F. When the policyholder has a rider, that policyholder is reinstated. Item G. When the policyholder has no rider, that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Item H. When the policyholder is subrogated, that policyholder has flood coverage. Item I. When the policyholder is bundled, that policyholder is not reinstated. Item J. When the policyholder is uninsurable, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item K. When the policyholder is not subrogated, that policyholder is indemnified. Item H is suspended when the policyholder is not uninsurable. Item J is suspended when the policyholder is not covered. Item I outranks Item F. Item A outranks Item E. Question: What applies to Xaver?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "has flood coverage", "is reimbursed", "is disputed", "is indemnified", "is reinstated", "has a premium discount", "has roadside assistance"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is reinstated", "unit_id": "u015995", "pair_id": "u015995-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015995-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "382cb063840b7bca", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a2", "a1", "a13", "a0", "a4", "a5", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u015995-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xaver has a dashcam. Xaver is covered. Edda is not a claimant. Edda has a rider. Xaver is not a claimant. Xaver has no rider. Xaver is not bundled.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is bundled, that policyholder has no roadside assistance. Item B. When the policyholder has a dashcam, that policyholder has an adjuster. Item C. When the policyholder is bundled, that policyholder is disputed. Item D. When the policyholder is not covered, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item E. When the policyholder is a claimant, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item F. When the policyholder has a rider, that policyholder is reinstated. Item G. When the policyholder has no rider, that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Item H. When the policyholder is subrogated, that policyholder has flood coverage. Item I. When the policyholder is bundled, that policyholder is not reinstated. Item J. When the policyholder is uninsurable, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item K. When the policyholder is not subrogated, that policyholder is indemnified. Item H is suspended when the policyholder is not uninsurable. Item J is suspended when the policyholder is not covered. Item I outranks Item F. Item A outranks Item E. Question: What applies to Xaver?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "has flood coverage", "is reimbursed", "is disputed", "is indemnified", "is reinstated", "has a premium discount", "has roadside assistance"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a deductible waiver", "unit_id": "u015995", "pair_id": "u015995-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u015995-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fc875b371cb686a2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a2", "a1", "a13", "a0", "a4", "a5", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u016014-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has no dashcam. Fabian is litigated. Una is not reinstated. Xaver is not reinstated. Xaver is not litigated. Una has no deductible waiver. Xaver has a dashcam. Xaver is bundled. Xaver is not disputed. Una is disputed. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Una is lapsed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is reinstated while is litigated while is lapsed, thus it is covered. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is a claimant while is a smoker while has a deductible waiver, thus it has no adjuster. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is a claimant while has a dashcam while is inspected, thus it has an adjuster. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is disputed, thus it is uninsurable. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is disputed, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has a dashcam while is bundled, thus it is inspected. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is subrogated while has a dashcam, thus it is a claimant. Provision 8: when the policyholder here has no dashcam, thus it is subrogated. Question: Would it be right to say that Xaver has no adjuster?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016014", "pair_id": "u016014-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016014-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "9b4ad36ac303bbb9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u016014-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has no dashcam. Fabian is litigated. Una is not reinstated. Xaver is not reinstated. Xaver is not litigated. Una has no deductible waiver. Xaver has a dashcam. Xaver is bundled. Xaver is not disputed. Una is disputed. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Una is lapsed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is reinstated while is litigated while is lapsed, thus it is covered. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is a claimant while is a smoker while has a deductible waiver, thus it has no adjuster. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is a claimant while has a dashcam while is inspected, thus it has an adjuster. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is disputed, thus it is uninsurable. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is disputed, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has a dashcam while is bundled, thus it is inspected. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is subrogated while has a dashcam, thus it is a claimant. Provision 8: when the policyholder here has a dashcam, thus it is subrogated. Question: Would it be right to say that Xaver has no adjuster?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016014", "pair_id": "u016014-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016014-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "b3e8ac0c33025ff4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u016014-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has no dashcam. Fabian is litigated. Una is not reinstated. Xaver is not reinstated. Xaver is not litigated. Una has no deductible waiver. Xaver has a dashcam. Xaver is bundled. Xaver is not disputed. Una is disputed. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Una is lapsed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is reinstated and likewise is litigated and likewise is lapsed, so it is covered. No. 2 While the given policyholder is a claimant and likewise is a smoker and likewise has a deductible waiver, so it has no adjuster. No. 3 While the given policyholder is a claimant and likewise has a dashcam and likewise is inspected, so it has an adjuster. No. 4 While the given policyholder is disputed, so it is uninsurable. No. 5 While the given policyholder is disputed, so it is not reimbursed. No. 6 While the given policyholder has a dashcam and likewise is bundled, so it is inspected. No. 7 While the given policyholder is subrogated and likewise has a dashcam, so it is a claimant. No. 8 While the given policyholder has no dashcam, so it is subrogated. Question: Is the claim \"Xaver has no adjuster\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016014", "pair_id": "u016014-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016014-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "9b4ad36ac303bbb9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u016014-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has no dashcam. Fabian is litigated. Una is not reinstated. Xaver is not reinstated. Xaver is not litigated. Una has no deductible waiver. Xaver has a dashcam. Xaver is bundled. Xaver is not disputed. Una is disputed. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Una is lapsed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is reinstated and likewise is litigated and likewise is lapsed, so it is covered. No. 2 While the given policyholder is a claimant and likewise is a smoker and likewise has a deductible waiver, so it has no adjuster. No. 3 While the given policyholder is a claimant and likewise has a dashcam and likewise is inspected, so it has an adjuster. No. 4 While the given policyholder is disputed, so it is uninsurable. No. 5 While the given policyholder is disputed, so it is not reimbursed. No. 6 While the given policyholder has a dashcam and likewise is bundled, so it is inspected. No. 7 While the given policyholder is subrogated and likewise has a dashcam, so it is a claimant. No. 8 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is subrogated. Question: Is the claim \"Xaver has no adjuster\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016014", "pair_id": "u016014-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016014-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "b3e8ac0c33025ff4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u016022-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara has a beneficiary. Viggo has no beneficiary. Viggo is not inspected. Viggo is uninsurable. Dmitri has no beneficiary. Viggo is not appraised. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo is not disputed. Edda is reinstated. Viggo has no flood coverage. Edda has no flood coverage. Edda is not inspected. Dmitri is not disputed. Yara has no flood coverage. Dmitri is reinstated. Yara is not uninsurable.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has an adjuster and is disputed and is not uninsurable, then it has a deductible waiver. (2) If a policyholder is appraised, then it is lapsed. (3) If a policyholder has flood coverage and is reinstated, then it is reimbursed. (4) If a policyholder has an adjuster and is inspected, then it is indemnified. (5) If a policyholder has an adjuster and is not inspected and is disputed, then it is grandfathered. (6) If a policyholder has no flood coverage, then it has an adjuster. (7) If a policyholder has an adjuster and is not disputed and is reinstated, then it has a premium discount. (8) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it is retired. Question: Which option holds for Viggo?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "is grandfathered", "has a premium discount", "is indemnified"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a premium discount", "unit_id": "u016022", "pair_id": "u016022-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016022-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "6b87c0adb8518510", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a8", "a0", "a9"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u016022-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara has a beneficiary. Viggo has no beneficiary. Viggo is not inspected. Viggo is uninsurable. Dmitri has no beneficiary. Viggo is not appraised. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo is disputed. Edda is reinstated. Viggo has no flood coverage. Edda has no flood coverage. Edda is not inspected. Dmitri is not disputed. Yara has no flood coverage. Dmitri is reinstated. Yara is not uninsurable.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has an adjuster and is disputed and is not uninsurable, then it has a deductible waiver. (2) If a policyholder is appraised, then it is lapsed. (3) If a policyholder has flood coverage and is reinstated, then it is reimbursed. (4) If a policyholder has an adjuster and is inspected, then it is indemnified. (5) If a policyholder has an adjuster and is not inspected and is disputed, then it is grandfathered. (6) If a policyholder has no flood coverage, then it has an adjuster. (7) If a policyholder has an adjuster and is not disputed and is reinstated, then it has a premium discount. (8) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it is retired. Question: Which option holds for Viggo?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "is grandfathered", "has a premium discount", "is indemnified"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is grandfathered", "unit_id": "u016022", "pair_id": "u016022-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016022-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "151b0f2c3922aa06", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a8", "a0", "a9"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u016022-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara has a beneficiary. Viggo has no beneficiary. Viggo is not inspected. Viggo is uninsurable. Dmitri has no beneficiary. Viggo is not appraised. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo is not disputed. Edda is reinstated. Viggo has no flood coverage. Edda has no flood coverage. Edda is not inspected. Dmitri is not disputed. Yara has no flood coverage. Dmitri is reinstated. Yara is not uninsurable.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has an adjuster, and is disputed, and is not uninsurable, that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Item B. When the policyholder is appraised, that policyholder is lapsed. Item C. When the policyholder has flood coverage, and is reinstated, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item D. When the policyholder has an adjuster, and is inspected, that policyholder is indemnified. Item E. When the policyholder has an adjuster, and is not inspected, and is disputed, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item F. When the policyholder has no flood coverage, that policyholder has an adjuster. Item G. When the policyholder has an adjuster, and is not disputed, and is reinstated, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item H. When the policyholder has a beneficiary, that policyholder is retired. Question: What applies to Viggo?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "is grandfathered", "has a premium discount", "is indemnified"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a premium discount", "unit_id": "u016022", "pair_id": "u016022-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016022-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "6b87c0adb8518510", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a8", "a0", "a9"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u016022-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara has a beneficiary. Viggo has no beneficiary. Viggo is not inspected. Viggo is uninsurable. Dmitri has no beneficiary. Viggo is not appraised. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo is disputed. Edda is reinstated. Viggo has no flood coverage. Edda has no flood coverage. Edda is not inspected. Dmitri is not disputed. Yara has no flood coverage. Dmitri is reinstated. Yara is not uninsurable.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has an adjuster, and is disputed, and is not uninsurable, that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Item B. When the policyholder is appraised, that policyholder is lapsed. Item C. When the policyholder has flood coverage, and is reinstated, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item D. When the policyholder has an adjuster, and is inspected, that policyholder is indemnified. Item E. When the policyholder has an adjuster, and is not inspected, and is disputed, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item F. When the policyholder has no flood coverage, that policyholder has an adjuster. Item G. When the policyholder has an adjuster, and is not disputed, and is reinstated, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item H. When the policyholder has a beneficiary, that policyholder is retired. Question: What applies to Viggo?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "is grandfathered", "has a premium discount", "is indemnified"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is grandfathered", "unit_id": "u016022", "pair_id": "u016022-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016022-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "151b0f2c3922aa06", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a8", "a0", "a9"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u016060-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh has a waybill. Kaveh has a locker slot. Kaveh is misrouted. Kaveh is stamped. Kaveh is damaged. Kaveh is refrigerated. Kaveh has a courier.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is labeled plus has a locker slot plus is oversized: then it has a barcode. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is labeled plus is damaged plus is stamped: then it has no barcode. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a waybill: then it is oversized. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is fragile plus has a waybill plus is damaged: then it is labeled. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is damaged plus is stamped: then it is fragile. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it is scanned. Policy II is waived if that parcel has a courier plus is refrigerated. Question: Is it so that Kaveh has a barcode?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016060", "pair_id": "u016060-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016060-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f5b9473bbb7f7156", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u016060-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh has a waybill. Kaveh has a locker slot. Kaveh is not misrouted. Kaveh is stamped. Kaveh is damaged. Kaveh is refrigerated. Kaveh has a courier.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is labeled plus has a locker slot plus is oversized: then it has a barcode. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is labeled plus is damaged plus is stamped: then it has no barcode. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a waybill: then it is oversized. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is fragile plus has a waybill plus is damaged: then it is labeled. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is damaged plus is stamped: then it is fragile. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it is scanned. Policy II is waived if that parcel has a courier plus is refrigerated. Question: Is it so that Kaveh has a barcode?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016060", "pair_id": "u016060-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016060-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "90cd2ca04fa58f88", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u016096-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is shortlisted. Capella has ethics clearance. Capella has a review mark of 97. Capella has no steering committee.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is not endorsed while has no ethics clearance, thus it is not collaborative. Provision 2: when the proposal here is shortlisted, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 3: when the proposal here is endorsed while has a review mark beneath 74, thus it has industry backing. Provision 4: when the proposal here has a review mark at or above 60, thus it is interdisciplinary. Provision 5: when the proposal here is interdisciplinary while has no steering committee, thus it is not endorsed. Provision 6: when the proposal here is not endorsed while has ethics clearance, thus it is collaborative. Question: Would it be right to say that Capella is not collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016096", "pair_id": "u016096-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016096-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "4e1dd2edce3623e6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u016096-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is shortlisted. Capella has ethics clearance. Capella has a review mark of 97. Capella has no steering committee.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is not endorsed while has no ethics clearance, thus it is not collaborative. Provision 2: when the proposal here is shortlisted, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 3: when the proposal here is endorsed while has a review mark beneath 74, thus it has industry backing. Provision 4: when the proposal here has a review mark at or above 60, thus it is interdisciplinary. Provision 5: when the proposal here is interdisciplinary while has a steering committee, thus it is not endorsed. Provision 6: when the proposal here is not endorsed while has ethics clearance, thus it is collaborative. Question: Would it be right to say that Capella is not collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016096", "pair_id": "u016096-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016096-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "fa5457ec19aaa000", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u016119-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is not delayed. Rasmus is not sealed. Rasmus is prepaid. Rasmus is registered. Ulla is not delayed. Odile has a postal zone of 44. Rasmus is hazardous. Odile is not registered. Odile is not hazardous. Ulla is hazardous. Rasmus has a postal zone of 78.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is labeled, then it is scanned. (2) If a parcel is scanned, then it is not misrouted. (3) If a parcel is weighed, then it is not scanned. (4) If a parcel is sealed, then it is palletized. (5) If a parcel is registered, then it has a waybill. (6) If a parcel is delayed, then it is labeled. (7) If a parcel is oversized, then it is not tracked. (8) If a parcel is fragile, then it is misrouted. (9) If a parcel has a waybill, then it is fragile. (10) If a parcel is registered, then it has no waybill. (11) If a parcel is hazardous, then it has a courier. (12) If a parcel has a postal zone of at least 66, then it is not fragile. (13) If a parcel is prepaid, then it is weighed. When (9) and (12) clash, (9) prevails. When (5) and (10) clash, (5) prevails. When (2) and (8) clash, (2) prevails. When (3) and (1) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Rasmus is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016119", "pair_id": "u016119-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016119-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3bf962c7b53d9e36", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016119-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is not delayed. Rasmus is not sealed. Rasmus is prepaid. Rasmus is registered. Ulla is not delayed. Odile has a postal zone of 44. Rasmus is hazardous. Odile is not registered. Odile is not hazardous. Ulla is hazardous. Rasmus has a postal zone of 78.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is labeled, then it is scanned. (2) If a parcel is scanned, then it is not misrouted. (3) If a parcel is weighed, then it is not scanned. (4) If a parcel is sealed, then it is palletized. (5) If a parcel is registered, then it has a waybill. (6) If a parcel is delayed, then it is labeled. (7) If a parcel is oversized, then it is not tracked. (8) If a parcel is fragile, then it is misrouted. (9) If a parcel has a waybill, then it is fragile. (10) If a parcel is registered, then it has no waybill. (11) If a parcel is hazardous, then it has a courier. (12) If a parcel has a postal zone of at least 66, then it is not fragile. (13) If a parcel is prepaid, then it is weighed. When (12) and (9) clash, (12) prevails. When (5) and (10) clash, (5) prevails. When (2) and (8) clash, (2) prevails. When (3) and (1) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Rasmus is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016119", "pair_id": "u016119-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016119-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "68705628502c54db", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016119-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is not delayed. Rasmus is not sealed. Rasmus is prepaid. Rasmus is registered. Ulla is not delayed. Odile has a postal zone of 44. Rasmus is hazardous. Odile is not registered. Odile is not hazardous. Ulla is hazardous. Rasmus has a postal zone of 78.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is labeled, it also is scanned. Clause 2: once any parcel is scanned, it also is not misrouted. Clause 3: once any parcel is weighed, it also is not scanned. Clause 4: once any parcel is sealed, it also is palletized. Clause 5: once any parcel is registered, it also has a waybill. Clause 6: once any parcel is delayed, it also is labeled. Clause 7: once any parcel is oversized, it also is not tracked. Clause 8: once any parcel is fragile, it also is misrouted. Clause 9: once any parcel has a waybill, it also is fragile. Clause 10: once any parcel is registered, it also has no waybill. Clause 11: once any parcel is hazardous, it also has a courier. Clause 12: once any parcel has a postal zone of 66 or more, it also is not fragile. Clause 13: once any parcel is prepaid, it also is weighed. Clause 9 overrides Clause 12. Clause 5 overrides Clause 10. Clause 2 overrides Clause 8. Clause 3 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Rasmus is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016119", "pair_id": "u016119-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016119-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3bf962c7b53d9e36", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016119-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is not delayed. Rasmus is not sealed. Rasmus is prepaid. Rasmus is registered. Ulla is not delayed. Odile has a postal zone of 44. Rasmus is hazardous. Odile is not registered. Odile is not hazardous. Ulla is hazardous. Rasmus has a postal zone of 78.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is labeled, it also is scanned. Clause 2: once any parcel is scanned, it also is not misrouted. Clause 3: once any parcel is weighed, it also is not scanned. Clause 4: once any parcel is sealed, it also is palletized. Clause 5: once any parcel is registered, it also has a waybill. Clause 6: once any parcel is delayed, it also is labeled. Clause 7: once any parcel is oversized, it also is not tracked. Clause 8: once any parcel is fragile, it also is misrouted. Clause 9: once any parcel has a waybill, it also is fragile. Clause 10: once any parcel is registered, it also has no waybill. Clause 11: once any parcel is hazardous, it also has a courier. Clause 12: once any parcel has a postal zone of 66 or more, it also is not fragile. Clause 13: once any parcel is prepaid, it also is weighed. Clause 12 overrides Clause 9. Clause 5 overrides Clause 10. Clause 2 overrides Clause 8. Clause 3 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Rasmus is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016119", "pair_id": "u016119-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016119-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "68705628502c54db", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016127-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a memory allotment of 40. Zephyr is monitored.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is not monitored, it also is stateless. Clause 2: once any workload has a memory allotment under 32, it also is not autoscaled. Clause 3: once any workload is monitored, it also has a public endpoint. Clause 1 does not hold for a workload when any workload is monitored. Question: Does it follow that Zephyr is sharded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016127", "pair_id": "u016127-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016127-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1736f3d6bc0f81b6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016127-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a memory allotment of 40. Zephyr is monitored. Zephyr is sharded.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is not monitored, it also is stateless. Clause 2: once any workload has a memory allotment under 32, it also is not autoscaled. Clause 3: once any workload is monitored, it also has a public endpoint. Clause 1 does not hold for a workload when any workload is monitored. Question: Does it follow that Zephyr is sharded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016127", "pair_id": "u016127-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016127-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d5ec5b4ca72c472b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016135-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not minified. Feldspar is reverted. Pumice is not experimental. Schist is not minified. Schist is reverted. Feldspar is experimental. Feldspar is not minified. Pumice is not reverted. Schist is experimental. Schist is not signed. Pumice is not signed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a security advisory plus is minified: then it is versioned. Policy II. Suppose that build is versioned plus is signed: then it has no changelog. Policy III. Suppose that build is versioned plus is experimental: then it has a changelog. Policy IV. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is profiled. Policy V. Suppose that build is minified: then it has a security advisory. Question: Is it so that Schist has a changelog?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016135", "pair_id": "u016135-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016135-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "7351bbb2efe49f81", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u016135-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not minified. Feldspar is reverted. Pumice is not experimental. Schist is not minified. Schist is not reverted. Feldspar is experimental. Feldspar is not minified. Pumice is not reverted. Schist is experimental. Schist is not signed. Pumice is not signed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a security advisory plus is minified: then it is versioned. Policy II. Suppose that build is versioned plus is signed: then it has no changelog. Policy III. Suppose that build is versioned plus is experimental: then it has a changelog. Policy IV. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is profiled. Policy V. Suppose that build is minified: then it has a security advisory. Question: Is it so that Schist has a changelog?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016135", "pair_id": "u016135-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016135-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "71ae56c382b3dd18", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u016163-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fomalhaut is exploratory. Fomalhaut is not multicenter. Kochab has a postdoc. Betelgeuse is not multicenter. Betelgeuse is not exploratory. Kochab is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut has a team size of 41. Fomalhaut is not resubmitted. Kochab is exploratory. Fomalhaut has industry backing. Fomalhaut has no postdoc.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has no postdoc and likewise has no industry backing, so it has a steering committee. No. 2 While the given proposal has ethics clearance and likewise has a team size not above 79, so it is longitudinal. No. 3 While the given proposal has no postdoc and likewise has industry backing and likewise is not multicenter, so it has ethics clearance. No. 4 While the given proposal has no postdoc and likewise has a team size that exceeds 69 and likewise is exploratory, so it is shortlisted. No. 5 While the given proposal is resubmitted, so it has no seed funding. Question: Select what holds for Fomalhaut: which option?", "options": ["has ethics clearance", "is shortlisted", "has a steering committee"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has ethics clearance", "unit_id": "u016163", "pair_id": "u016163-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016163-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "7f172bc1ea0ea194", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a9", "a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u016163-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fomalhaut is exploratory. Fomalhaut is not multicenter. Kochab has a postdoc. Betelgeuse is not multicenter. Betelgeuse is not exploratory. Kochab is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut has a team size of 41. Fomalhaut is resubmitted. Kochab is exploratory. Fomalhaut has industry backing. Fomalhaut has no postdoc.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has no postdoc and likewise has no industry backing, so it has a steering committee. No. 2 While the given proposal has ethics clearance and likewise has a team size not above 79, so it is longitudinal. No. 3 While the given proposal has no postdoc and likewise has industry backing and likewise is not multicenter, so it has ethics clearance. No. 4 While the given proposal has no postdoc and likewise has a team size that exceeds 69 and likewise is exploratory, so it is shortlisted. No. 5 While the given proposal is resubmitted, so it has no seed funding. Question: Select what holds for Fomalhaut: which option?", "options": ["has ethics clearance", "is shortlisted", "has a steering committee"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has ethics clearance", "unit_id": "u016163", "pair_id": "u016163-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016163-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "fbd7f5e430c60d03", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a9", "a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u016164-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek is vaccinated. Dorian has a fever reading of 52. Benedek is anemic. Benedek has a fever reading of 84. Benedek is rescheduled. Benedek has a pulse rate of 90. Benedek has a pacemaker. Benedek is not admitted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is hypertensive provided that it is referred. Section 2: a patient is contagious provided that it is hypertensive as well as is allergic. Section 3: a patient is discharged provided that it is hypertensive as well as is not anemic as well as has a fever reading of 26 or higher. Section 4: a patient is referred provided that it has a pacemaker as well as is vaccinated. Section 5: a patient has a caregiver provided that it is hypertensive as well as has a fever reading exceeding 18 as well as has a pulse rate lower than 13. Section 6: a patient is sedated provided that it is hypertensive as well as has a pulse rate exceeding 33 as well as is anemic. Section 7: a patient is symptomatic provided that it is rescheduled as well as is not admitted. Section 6 lapses for a patient if it is postoperative. Section 2 lapses for a patient if it is not anemic. Question: Which statement fits Benedek?", "options": ["is discharged", "has a caregiver", "is contagious", "is sedated"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is sedated", "unit_id": "u016164", "pair_id": "u016164-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016164-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a768f62dd549b2f2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a15", "a8", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016164-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek is vaccinated. Dorian has a fever reading of 52. Benedek is anemic. Benedek has a fever reading of 84. Benedek is not rescheduled. Benedek has a pulse rate of 90. Benedek has a pacemaker. Benedek is not admitted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is hypertensive provided that it is referred. Section 2: a patient is contagious provided that it is hypertensive as well as is allergic. Section 3: a patient is discharged provided that it is hypertensive as well as is not anemic as well as has a fever reading of 26 or higher. Section 4: a patient is referred provided that it has a pacemaker as well as is vaccinated. Section 5: a patient has a caregiver provided that it is hypertensive as well as has a fever reading exceeding 18 as well as has a pulse rate lower than 13. Section 6: a patient is sedated provided that it is hypertensive as well as has a pulse rate exceeding 33 as well as is anemic. Section 7: a patient is symptomatic provided that it is rescheduled as well as is not admitted. Section 6 lapses for a patient if it is postoperative. Section 2 lapses for a patient if it is not anemic. Question: Which statement fits Benedek?", "options": ["is discharged", "has a caregiver", "is contagious", "is sedated"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is sedated", "unit_id": "u016164", "pair_id": "u016164-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016164-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "db8ddc92a69d6b88", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a15", "a8", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016164-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek is vaccinated. Dorian has a fever reading of 52. Benedek is anemic. Benedek has a fever reading of 84. Benedek is rescheduled. Benedek has a pulse rate of 90. Benedek has a pacemaker. Benedek is not admitted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is referred: then it is hypertensive. Policy II. Suppose that patient is hypertensive plus is allergic: then it is contagious. Policy III. Suppose that patient is hypertensive plus is not anemic plus has a fever reading no lower than 26: then it is discharged. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a pacemaker plus is vaccinated: then it is referred. Policy V. Suppose that patient is hypertensive plus has a fever reading higher than 18 plus has a pulse rate smaller than 13: then it has a caregiver. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is hypertensive plus has a pulse rate higher than 33 plus is anemic: then it is sedated. Policy VII. Suppose that patient is rescheduled plus is not admitted: then it is symptomatic. Policy VI is waived if that patient is postoperative. Policy II is waived if that patient is not anemic. Question: Which choice is right for Benedek?", "options": ["is discharged", "has a caregiver", "is contagious", "is sedated"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is sedated", "unit_id": "u016164", "pair_id": "u016164-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016164-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a768f62dd549b2f2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a15", "a8", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016164-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek is vaccinated. Dorian has a fever reading of 52. Benedek is anemic. Benedek has a fever reading of 84. Benedek is not rescheduled. Benedek has a pulse rate of 90. Benedek has a pacemaker. Benedek is not admitted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is referred: then it is hypertensive. Policy II. Suppose that patient is hypertensive plus is allergic: then it is contagious. Policy III. Suppose that patient is hypertensive plus is not anemic plus has a fever reading no lower than 26: then it is discharged. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a pacemaker plus is vaccinated: then it is referred. Policy V. Suppose that patient is hypertensive plus has a fever reading higher than 18 plus has a pulse rate smaller than 13: then it has a caregiver. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is hypertensive plus has a pulse rate higher than 33 plus is anemic: then it is sedated. Policy VII. Suppose that patient is rescheduled plus is not admitted: then it is symptomatic. Policy VI is waived if that patient is postoperative. Policy II is waived if that patient is not anemic. Question: Which choice is right for Benedek?", "options": ["is discharged", "has a caregiver", "is contagious", "is sedated"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is sedated", "unit_id": "u016164", "pair_id": "u016164-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016164-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "db8ddc92a69d6b88", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a15", "a8", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016203-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is indebted. Hamid has a guarantor. Folke is a homeowner. Hamid is a homeowner. Folke has no guarantor.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no lien provided that it is indebted. Section 2: a borrower is underwritten provided that it is a homeowner. Section 3: a borrower has a lien provided that it is a homeowner as well as has a guarantor. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it is a homeowner. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Folke has a guarantor. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016203", "pair_id": "u016203-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016203-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea8d68264d4d7f5f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016203-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is indebted. Hamid has a guarantor. Folke is not a homeowner. Hamid is a homeowner. Folke has no guarantor.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no lien provided that it is indebted. Section 2: a borrower is underwritten provided that it is a homeowner. Section 3: a borrower has a lien provided that it is a homeowner as well as has a guarantor. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it is a homeowner. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Folke has a guarantor. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016203", "pair_id": "u016203-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016203-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "739463deacbf65f7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016203-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is indebted. Hamid has a guarantor. Folke is a homeowner. Hamid is a homeowner. Folke has no guarantor.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is indebted: then it has no lien. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner: then it is underwritten. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner plus has a guarantor: then it has a lien. Policy III is waived if that borrower is a homeowner. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Folke has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016203", "pair_id": "u016203-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016203-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea8d68264d4d7f5f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016203-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is indebted. Hamid has a guarantor. Folke is not a homeowner. Hamid is a homeowner. Folke has no guarantor.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is indebted: then it has no lien. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner: then it is underwritten. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner plus has a guarantor: then it has a lien. Policy III is waived if that borrower is a homeowner. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Folke has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016203", "pair_id": "u016203-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016203-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "739463deacbf65f7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016216-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is not encrypted. Zephyr is not sharded. Zephyr is not mirrored. Zephyr is not throttled. Zephyr is not sandboxed. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a firewall while is mirrored while is sandboxed, thus it is backed up. Provision 2: when the workload here is sharded while has no dedicated host, thus it has a GPU. Provision 3: when the workload here is idle, thus it has no firewall. Provision 4: when the workload here is idle, thus it has no GPU. Provision 5: when the workload here is not encrypted, thus it has a firewall. Provision 6: when the workload here has a firewall while is not mirrored while is not throttled, thus it is not backed up. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Would it be right to say that Zephyr is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016216", "pair_id": "u016216-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016216-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f10704d39308b7bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u016216-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is not encrypted. Zephyr is not sharded. Zephyr is not mirrored. Zephyr is not throttled. Zephyr is not sandboxed. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a firewall while is mirrored while is sandboxed, thus it is backed up. Provision 2: when the workload here is sharded while has no dedicated host, thus it has a GPU. Provision 3: when the workload here is idle, thus it has no firewall. Provision 4: when the workload here is idle, thus it has no GPU. Provision 5: when the workload here is not encrypted, thus it has a firewall. Provision 6: when the workload here has a firewall while is not mirrored while is throttled, thus it is not backed up. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Would it be right to say that Zephyr is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016216", "pair_id": "u016216-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016216-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0183874ca03470b6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u016216-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is not encrypted. Zephyr is not sharded. Zephyr is not mirrored. Zephyr is not throttled. Zephyr is not sandboxed. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a firewall and further is mirrored and further is sandboxed, it thereby is backed up. Point B. If said workload is sharded and further has no dedicated host, it thereby has a GPU. Point C. If said workload is idle, it thereby has no firewall. Point D. If said workload is idle, it thereby has no GPU. Point E. If said workload is not encrypted, it thereby has a firewall. Point F. If said workload has a firewall and further is not mirrored and further is not throttled, it thereby is not backed up. Point D supersedes Point B. Point E supersedes Point C. Point A supersedes Point F. Question: Statement: Zephyr is backed up. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016216", "pair_id": "u016216-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016216-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f10704d39308b7bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u016216-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is not encrypted. Zephyr is not sharded. Zephyr is not mirrored. Zephyr is not throttled. Zephyr is not sandboxed. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a firewall and further is mirrored and further is sandboxed, it thereby is backed up. Point B. If said workload is sharded and further has no dedicated host, it thereby has a GPU. Point C. If said workload is idle, it thereby has no firewall. Point D. If said workload is idle, it thereby has no GPU. Point E. If said workload is not encrypted, it thereby has a firewall. Point F. If said workload has a firewall and further is not mirrored and further is throttled, it thereby is not backed up. Point D supersedes Point B. Point E supersedes Point C. Point A supersedes Point F. Question: Statement: Zephyr is backed up. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016216", "pair_id": "u016216-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016216-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0183874ca03470b6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u016261-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not signed. Feldspar is flaky. Feldspar is not benchmarked. Quartz is obsolete. Quartz is benchmarked. Quartz is not documented. Quartz is minified. Feldspar is documented. Quartz is flaky. Feldspar is minified. Feldspar is obsolete.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build has a changelog provided that it is profiled. Section 2: a build is profiled provided that it is flaky. Section 3: a build is not profiled provided that it is flaky. Section 4: a build is not notarized provided that it is obsolete. Section 5: a build has no changelog provided that it is profiled. Section 6: a build has a security advisory provided that it is documented. Section 7: a build has no security advisory provided that it is signed. Section 8: a build is notarized provided that it is documented. Section 5 lapses for a build if it is signed. Section 2 lapses for a build if it is signed. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is benchmarked. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 8. Question: Quartz has a changelog. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016261", "pair_id": "u016261-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016261-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bcfa9289fa487b63", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u016261-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not signed. Feldspar is flaky. Feldspar is not benchmarked. Quartz is obsolete. Quartz is benchmarked. Quartz is not documented. Quartz is minified. Feldspar is documented. Quartz is flaky. Feldspar is minified. Feldspar is obsolete.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build has a changelog provided that it is profiled. Section 2: a build is profiled provided that it is flaky. Section 3: a build is not profiled provided that it is flaky. Section 4: a build is not notarized provided that it is obsolete. Section 5: a build has no changelog provided that it is profiled. Section 6: a build has a security advisory provided that it is documented. Section 7: a build has no security advisory provided that it is signed. Section 8: a build is notarized provided that it is documented. Section 5 lapses for a build if it is signed. Section 2 lapses for a build if it is signed. Section 1 lapses for a build if it is minified. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is benchmarked. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 8. Question: Quartz has a changelog. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016261", "pair_id": "u016261-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016261-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "54c1e5f07699ff46", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u016261-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not signed. Feldspar is flaky. Feldspar is not benchmarked. Quartz is obsolete. Quartz is benchmarked. Quartz is not documented. Quartz is minified. Feldspar is documented. Quartz is flaky. Feldspar is minified. Feldspar is obsolete.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is profiled: then it has a changelog. Policy II. Suppose that build is flaky: then it is profiled. Policy III. Suppose that build is flaky: then it is not profiled. Policy IV. Suppose that build is obsolete: then it is not notarized. Policy V. Suppose that build is profiled: then it has no changelog. Policy VI. Suppose that build is documented: then it has a security advisory. Policy VII. Suppose that build is signed: then it has no security advisory. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is documented: then it is notarized. Policy V is waived if that build is signed. Policy II is waived if that build is signed. Policy IV is waived if that build is benchmarked. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy VIII. Question: Is it so that Quartz has a changelog?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016261", "pair_id": "u016261-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016261-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bcfa9289fa487b63", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u016261-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not signed. Feldspar is flaky. Feldspar is not benchmarked. Quartz is obsolete. Quartz is benchmarked. Quartz is not documented. Quartz is minified. Feldspar is documented. Quartz is flaky. Feldspar is minified. Feldspar is obsolete.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is profiled: then it has a changelog. Policy II. Suppose that build is flaky: then it is profiled. Policy III. Suppose that build is flaky: then it is not profiled. Policy IV. Suppose that build is obsolete: then it is not notarized. Policy V. Suppose that build is profiled: then it has no changelog. Policy VI. Suppose that build is documented: then it has a security advisory. Policy VII. Suppose that build is signed: then it has no security advisory. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is documented: then it is notarized. Policy V is waived if that build is signed. Policy II is waived if that build is signed. Policy I is waived if that build is minified. Policy IV is waived if that build is benchmarked. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy VIII. Question: Is it so that Quartz has a changelog?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016261", "pair_id": "u016261-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016261-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "54c1e5f07699ff46", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u016261-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not signed. Feldspar is flaky. Feldspar is not benchmarked. Quartz is obsolete. Quartz is benchmarked. Quartz is not documented. Quartz is minified. Feldspar is documented. Quartz is flaky. Feldspar is minified. Feldspar is obsolete.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is profiled, it then has a changelog. #2 Each time a build is flaky, it then is profiled. #3 Each time a build is flaky, it then is not profiled. #4 Each time a build is obsolete, it then is not notarized. #5 Each time a build is profiled, it then has no changelog. #6 Each time a build is documented, it then has a security advisory. #7 Each time a build is signed, it then has no security advisory. #8 Each time a build is documented, it then is notarized. #5 is set aside if a build is signed. #2 is set aside if a build is signed. #4 is set aside if a build is benchmarked. #3 yields to #2. #6 yields to #7. #5 yields to #1. #8 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Quartz has a changelog?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016261", "pair_id": "u016261-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016261-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bcfa9289fa487b63", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u016261-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not signed. Feldspar is flaky. Feldspar is not benchmarked. Quartz is obsolete. Quartz is benchmarked. Quartz is not documented. Quartz is minified. Feldspar is documented. Quartz is flaky. Feldspar is minified. Feldspar is obsolete.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is profiled, it then has a changelog. #2 Each time a build is flaky, it then is profiled. #3 Each time a build is flaky, it then is not profiled. #4 Each time a build is obsolete, it then is not notarized. #5 Each time a build is profiled, it then has no changelog. #6 Each time a build is documented, it then has a security advisory. #7 Each time a build is signed, it then has no security advisory. #8 Each time a build is documented, it then is notarized. #5 is set aside if a build is signed. #2 is set aside if a build is signed. #1 is set aside if a build is minified. #4 is set aside if a build is benchmarked. #3 yields to #2. #6 yields to #7. #5 yields to #1. #8 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Quartz has a changelog?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016261", "pair_id": "u016261-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016261-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "54c1e5f07699ff46", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u016314-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vilja is allergic. Xenia is not vaccinated. Cosima is not anemic. Xenia is anemic. Vilja is not triaged. Xenia has a caregiver. Cosima is not hypertensive. Vilja is not vaccinated. Zora is admitted. Xenia is bedridden. Vilja is hypertensive. Zora is not vaccinated. Vilja is admitted. Zora is anemic. Vilja is not bedridden. Zora is bedridden. Zora has a caregiver. Cosima is not triaged. Cosima is discharged. Vilja is discharged. Xenia has an interpreter. Xenia is hypertensive. Zora is not discharged. Vilja has no caregiver. Cosima has a caregiver. Cosima has an interpreter.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is admitted, and is not triaged, that patient is contagious. Item B. When the patient has no caregiver, that patient is diabetic. Item C. When the patient is ambulatory, and is hypertensive, and is discharged, that patient is pregnant. Item D. When the patient is ambulatory, and is not hypertensive, and is not allergic, that patient is referred. Item E. When the patient is not discharged, and is not bedridden, that patient has no chaperone. Item F. When the patient is ambulatory, and is vaccinated, and is not fasting, that patient is rescheduled. Item G. When the patient is ambulatory, and is not vaccinated, and has no chaperone, that patient is sedated. Item H. When the patient is anemic, and has an interpreter, and is vaccinated, that patient is not fasting. Item I. When the patient is diabetic, and has no caregiver, that patient is ambulatory. Question: What applies to Vilja?", "options": ["is pregnant", "is referred", "is rescheduled", "is sedated"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is pregnant", "unit_id": "u016314", "pair_id": "u016314-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/19/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016314-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "b80534682be25047", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a0", "a14", "a8", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016314-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vilja is allergic. Xenia is not vaccinated. Cosima is not anemic. Xenia is anemic. Vilja is not triaged. Xenia has a caregiver. Cosima is not hypertensive. Vilja is not vaccinated. Zora is admitted. Xenia is bedridden. Vilja is hypertensive. Zora is not vaccinated. Vilja is admitted. Zora is anemic. Vilja is not bedridden. Zora is bedridden. Zora has a caregiver. Cosima is not triaged. Cosima is discharged. Vilja is not discharged. Xenia has an interpreter. Xenia is hypertensive. Zora is not discharged. Vilja has no caregiver. Cosima has a caregiver. Cosima has an interpreter.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is admitted, and is not triaged, that patient is contagious. Item B. When the patient has no caregiver, that patient is diabetic. Item C. When the patient is ambulatory, and is hypertensive, and is discharged, that patient is pregnant. Item D. When the patient is ambulatory, and is not hypertensive, and is not allergic, that patient is referred. Item E. When the patient is not discharged, and is not bedridden, that patient has no chaperone. Item F. When the patient is ambulatory, and is vaccinated, and is not fasting, that patient is rescheduled. Item G. When the patient is ambulatory, and is not vaccinated, and has no chaperone, that patient is sedated. Item H. When the patient is anemic, and has an interpreter, and is vaccinated, that patient is not fasting. Item I. When the patient is diabetic, and has no caregiver, that patient is ambulatory. Question: What applies to Vilja?", "options": ["is pregnant", "is referred", "is rescheduled", "is sedated"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is sedated", "unit_id": "u016314", "pair_id": "u016314-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/19/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016314-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "a8f0de85eee87c69", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a0", "a14", "a8", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016367-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja has a mobility rank of 61. Wendel is not admitted. Yusuf is not postoperative. Vilja is admitted. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 63. Yusuf is rescheduled. Yusuf is not admitted.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is postoperative, then it is diabetic. (2) If a patient is not anemic, then it has a caregiver. (3) If a patient is diabetic, then it has no caregiver. (4) If a patient has a mobility rank of at least 49, then it is anemic. (5) If a patient is not diabetic, then it is bedridden. (6) If a patient is admitted, then it is symptomatic. (7) If a patient is rescheduled, then it is triaged. Question: Is it true that Yusuf has no caregiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016367", "pair_id": "u016367-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016367-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "605ef3de41de9579", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u016367-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja has a mobility rank of 61. Wendel is not admitted. Yusuf is not postoperative. Vilja is admitted. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 63. Yusuf is rescheduled. Yusuf is not admitted.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is postoperative, then it is diabetic. (2) If a patient is anemic, then it has a caregiver. (3) If a patient is diabetic, then it has no caregiver. (4) If a patient has a mobility rank of at least 49, then it is anemic. (5) If a patient is not diabetic, then it is bedridden. (6) If a patient is admitted, then it is symptomatic. (7) If a patient is rescheduled, then it is triaged. Question: Is it true that Yusuf has no caregiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016367", "pair_id": "u016367-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016367-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "81d6d53730fba769", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u016367-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja has a mobility rank of 61. Wendel is not admitted. Yusuf is not postoperative. Vilja is admitted. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 63. Yusuf is rescheduled. Yusuf is not admitted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is postoperative, it also is diabetic. Clause 2: once any patient is not anemic, it also has a caregiver. Clause 3: once any patient is diabetic, it also has no caregiver. Clause 4: once any patient has a mobility rank of 49 or more, it also is anemic. Clause 5: once any patient is not diabetic, it also is bedridden. Clause 6: once any patient is admitted, it also is symptomatic. Clause 7: once any patient is rescheduled, it also is triaged. Question: Does it follow that Yusuf has no caregiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016367", "pair_id": "u016367-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016367-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "605ef3de41de9579", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u016367-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja has a mobility rank of 61. Wendel is not admitted. Yusuf is not postoperative. Vilja is admitted. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 63. Yusuf is rescheduled. Yusuf is not admitted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is postoperative, it also is diabetic. Clause 2: once any patient is anemic, it also has a caregiver. Clause 3: once any patient is diabetic, it also has no caregiver. Clause 4: once any patient has a mobility rank of 49 or more, it also is anemic. Clause 5: once any patient is not diabetic, it also is bedridden. Clause 6: once any patient is admitted, it also is symptomatic. Clause 7: once any patient is rescheduled, it also is triaged. Question: Does it follow that Yusuf has no caregiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016367", "pair_id": "u016367-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016367-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "81d6d53730fba769", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u016369-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel is idle. Kestrel is provisioned. Kestrel has a latency budget of 63. Zephyr is not idle.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a failover node while has a latency budget at or below 44, thus it is not deprecated. Provision 2: when the workload here is idle, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 3: when the workload here has a failover node while has a latency budget beyond 44, thus it is deprecated. Provision 4: when the workload here has a dedicated host, thus it has a failover node. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Kestrel is not deprecated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016369", "pair_id": "u016369-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016369-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "710f67fd47a2c8e0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016369-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel is idle. Kestrel is provisioned. Kestrel has a latency budget of 63. Zephyr is not idle.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a failover node while has a latency budget at or below 44, thus it is not deprecated. Provision 2: when the workload here is idle, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 3: when the workload here is provisioned, thus it is not replicated. Provision 4: when the workload here has a failover node while has a latency budget beyond 44, thus it is deprecated. Provision 5: when the workload here has a dedicated host, thus it has a failover node. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Kestrel is not deprecated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016369", "pair_id": "u016369-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016369-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a7ec68c2fa5407a6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016437-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is grandfathered. Xaver has no premium discount. Fabian is indemnified. Fabian is reimbursed. Agata has no premium discount. Edda is grandfathered. Edda has no premium discount. Xaver has no flood coverage. Fabian is grandfathered. Agata is indemnified. Edda has flood coverage. Xaver is indemnified. Edda is not reinstated. Agata has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it has no dashcam. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a dashcam, thus it is retired. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is indemnified, thus it is covered. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a premium discount, thus it is lapsed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it is not covered. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it is not retired. Provision 4 has no effect when the policyholder here is grandfathered. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here has a premium discount. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here is reinstated. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here has a premium discount. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Would it be right to say that Fabian has no dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016437", "pair_id": "u016437-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016437-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ae51f2a36a7431b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016437-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is grandfathered. Xaver has no premium discount. Fabian is not indemnified. Fabian is reimbursed. Agata has no premium discount. Edda is grandfathered. Edda has no premium discount. Xaver has no flood coverage. Fabian is grandfathered. Agata is indemnified. Edda has flood coverage. Xaver is indemnified. Edda is not reinstated. Agata has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it has no dashcam. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a dashcam, thus it is retired. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is indemnified, thus it is covered. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a premium discount, thus it is lapsed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it is not covered. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it is not retired. Provision 4 has no effect when the policyholder here is grandfathered. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here has a premium discount. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here is reinstated. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here has a premium discount. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Would it be right to say that Fabian has no dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016437", "pair_id": "u016437-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016437-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "65f0ba14557f8239", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016437-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is grandfathered. Xaver has no premium discount. Fabian is indemnified. Fabian is reimbursed. Agata has no premium discount. Edda is grandfathered. Edda has no premium discount. Xaver has no flood coverage. Fabian is grandfathered. Agata is indemnified. Edda has flood coverage. Xaver is indemnified. Edda is not reinstated. Agata has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby has no dashcam. Point B. If said policyholder has a dashcam, it thereby is retired. Point C. If said policyholder is indemnified, it thereby is covered. Point D. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby has a dashcam. Point E. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby is lapsed. Point F. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby is not covered. Point G. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby is not retired. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is grandfathered. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder has a premium discount. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder is reinstated. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder has a premium discount. Point C supersedes Point F. Point D supersedes Point A. Point B supersedes Point G. Question: Statement: Fabian has no dashcam. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016437", "pair_id": "u016437-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016437-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ae51f2a36a7431b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016437-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is grandfathered. Xaver has no premium discount. Fabian is not indemnified. Fabian is reimbursed. Agata has no premium discount. Edda is grandfathered. Edda has no premium discount. Xaver has no flood coverage. Fabian is grandfathered. Agata is indemnified. Edda has flood coverage. Xaver is indemnified. Edda is not reinstated. Agata has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby has no dashcam. Point B. If said policyholder has a dashcam, it thereby is retired. Point C. If said policyholder is indemnified, it thereby is covered. Point D. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby has a dashcam. Point E. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby is lapsed. Point F. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby is not covered. Point G. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby is not retired. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is grandfathered. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder has a premium discount. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder is reinstated. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder has a premium discount. Point C supersedes Point F. Point D supersedes Point A. Point B supersedes Point G. Question: Statement: Fabian has no dashcam. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016437", "pair_id": "u016437-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016437-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "65f0ba14557f8239", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016437-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is grandfathered. Xaver has no premium discount. Fabian is indemnified. Fabian is reimbursed. Agata has no premium discount. Edda is grandfathered. Edda has no premium discount. Xaver has no flood coverage. Fabian is grandfathered. Agata is indemnified. Edda has flood coverage. Xaver is indemnified. Edda is not reinstated. Agata has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is reimbursed, so it has no dashcam. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is retired. No. 3 While the given policyholder is indemnified, so it is covered. No. 4 While the given policyholder is reimbursed, so it has a dashcam. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a premium discount, so it is lapsed. No. 6 While the given policyholder has flood coverage, so it is not covered. No. 7 While the given policyholder is reimbursed, so it is not retired. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is grandfathered. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a premium discount. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is reinstated. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a premium discount. No. 3 wins over No. 6. No. 4 wins over No. 1. No. 2 wins over No. 7. Question: Is the claim \"Fabian has no dashcam\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016437", "pair_id": "u016437-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016437-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ae51f2a36a7431b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016437-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is grandfathered. Xaver has no premium discount. Fabian is not indemnified. Fabian is reimbursed. Agata has no premium discount. Edda is grandfathered. Edda has no premium discount. Xaver has no flood coverage. Fabian is grandfathered. Agata is indemnified. Edda has flood coverage. Xaver is indemnified. Edda is not reinstated. Agata has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is reimbursed, so it has no dashcam. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is retired. No. 3 While the given policyholder is indemnified, so it is covered. No. 4 While the given policyholder is reimbursed, so it has a dashcam. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a premium discount, so it is lapsed. No. 6 While the given policyholder has flood coverage, so it is not covered. No. 7 While the given policyholder is reimbursed, so it is not retired. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is grandfathered. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a premium discount. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is reinstated. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a premium discount. No. 3 wins over No. 6. No. 4 wins over No. 1. No. 2 wins over No. 7. Question: Is the claim \"Fabian has no dashcam\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016437", "pair_id": "u016437-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016437-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "65f0ba14557f8239", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016471-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery is not mirrored. Orrery is sandboxed. Orrery is not idle. Orrery has a public endpoint. Orrery is not isolated. Orrery has a failover node. Orrery is deprecated. Orrery is containerized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is mirrored, thus it has no GPU. Provision 2: when the workload here has a dedicated host while is mirrored, thus it is provisioned. Provision 3: when the workload here has a failover node, thus it is autoscaled. Provision 4: when the workload here has a dedicated host while is not idle, thus it has a GPU. Provision 5: when the workload here has a dedicated host while is not isolated while is not deprecated, thus it has a snapshot. Provision 6: when the workload here has a dedicated host while is isolated, thus it is sharded. Provision 7: when the workload here is containerized while has a public endpoint, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 8: when the workload here has a dedicated host while is idle, thus it is throttled. Provision 9: when the workload here is not sandboxed, thus it is not throttled. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 9. Question: Which one describes Orrery?", "options": ["is throttled", "is sharded", "is provisioned", "has a GPU", "has a snapshot"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a GPU", "unit_id": "u016471", "pair_id": "u016471-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016471-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5f36a4c985e1e8a7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a5", "a4", "a8", "a7"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u016471-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery is not mirrored. Orrery is sandboxed. Orrery is idle. Orrery has a public endpoint. Orrery is not isolated. Orrery has a failover node. Orrery is deprecated. Orrery is containerized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is mirrored, thus it has no GPU. Provision 2: when the workload here has a dedicated host while is mirrored, thus it is provisioned. Provision 3: when the workload here has a failover node, thus it is autoscaled. Provision 4: when the workload here has a dedicated host while is not idle, thus it has a GPU. Provision 5: when the workload here has a dedicated host while is not isolated while is not deprecated, thus it has a snapshot. Provision 6: when the workload here has a dedicated host while is isolated, thus it is sharded. Provision 7: when the workload here is containerized while has a public endpoint, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 8: when the workload here has a dedicated host while is idle, thus it is throttled. Provision 9: when the workload here is not sandboxed, thus it is not throttled. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 9. Question: Which one describes Orrery?", "options": ["is throttled", "is sharded", "is provisioned", "has a GPU", "has a snapshot"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is throttled", "unit_id": "u016471", "pair_id": "u016471-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016471-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b1f2c62010a9bf17", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a5", "a4", "a8", "a7"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u016482-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has a delivery window of 73. Ulla has a delivery window of 40. Ulla is labeled. Mirela has no locker slot. Mirela is scanned. Mirela has a courier. Kaveh has a postal zone of 85. Mirela has a postal zone of 9. Kaveh is not labeled. Mirela is fragile. Mirela is labeled. Kaveh has no barcode. Kaveh is scanned. Ulla has a courier. Kaveh is fragile.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is fragile, thus it is not perishable. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a postal zone at or above 62 while has a delivery window at or below 69, thus it is sealed. Provision 3: when the parcel here is oversized while has a postal zone at or above 11 while is scanned, thus it is undeliverable. Provision 4: when the parcel here is oversized while has a postal zone beneath 11 while has a delivery window beyond 73, thus it is not undeliverable. Provision 5: when the parcel here is scanned while has a courier, thus it is oversized. Provision 6: when the parcel here is labeled while has a courier while has a barcode, thus it is weighed. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is scanned while is labeled. Provision 1 has no effect when the parcel here has a postal zone at or below 88. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here has a courier. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Mirela is undeliverable?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016482", "pair_id": "u016482-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016482-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cac9e72a06fcc950", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016482-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has a delivery window of 73. Ulla has a delivery window of 40. Ulla is labeled. Mirela has no locker slot. Mirela is scanned. Mirela has a courier. Kaveh has a postal zone of 85. Mirela has a postal zone of 9. Kaveh is not labeled. Mirela is fragile. Mirela is labeled. Kaveh has no barcode. Kaveh is scanned. Ulla has a courier. Kaveh is fragile.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is fragile, thus it is not perishable. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a postal zone at or above 62 while has a delivery window at or below 69, thus it is sealed. Provision 3: when the parcel here is oversized while has a postal zone at or above 11 while is scanned, thus it is undeliverable. Provision 4: when the parcel here is oversized while has a postal zone beneath 11 while has a delivery window beyond 71, thus it is not undeliverable. Provision 5: when the parcel here is scanned while has a courier, thus it is oversized. Provision 6: when the parcel here is labeled while has a courier while has a barcode, thus it is weighed. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is scanned while is labeled. Provision 1 has no effect when the parcel here has a postal zone at or below 88. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here has a courier. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Mirela is undeliverable?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016482", "pair_id": "u016482-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016482-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0ecb2952f680a7d5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016482-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has a delivery window of 73. Ulla has a delivery window of 40. Ulla is labeled. Mirela has no locker slot. Mirela is scanned. Mirela has a courier. Kaveh has a postal zone of 85. Mirela has a postal zone of 9. Kaveh is not labeled. Mirela is fragile. Mirela is labeled. Kaveh has no barcode. Kaveh is scanned. Ulla has a courier. Kaveh is fragile.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is fragile, it thereby is not perishable. Point B. If said parcel has a postal zone of minimum 62 and further has a delivery window of maximum 69, it thereby is sealed. Point C. If said parcel is oversized and further has a postal zone of minimum 11 and further is scanned, it thereby is undeliverable. Point D. If said parcel is oversized and further has a postal zone short of 11 and further has a delivery window in excess of 73, it thereby is not undeliverable. Point E. If said parcel is scanned and further has a courier, it thereby is oversized. Point F. If said parcel is labeled and further has a courier and further has a barcode, it thereby is weighed. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is scanned and further is labeled. Point A is cancelled if said parcel has a postal zone of maximum 88. Point B is cancelled if said parcel has a courier. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Mirela is undeliverable. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016482", "pair_id": "u016482-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016482-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cac9e72a06fcc950", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016482-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has a delivery window of 73. Ulla has a delivery window of 40. Ulla is labeled. Mirela has no locker slot. Mirela is scanned. Mirela has a courier. Kaveh has a postal zone of 85. Mirela has a postal zone of 9. Kaveh is not labeled. Mirela is fragile. Mirela is labeled. Kaveh has no barcode. Kaveh is scanned. Ulla has a courier. Kaveh is fragile.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is fragile, it thereby is not perishable. Point B. If said parcel has a postal zone of minimum 62 and further has a delivery window of maximum 69, it thereby is sealed. Point C. If said parcel is oversized and further has a postal zone of minimum 11 and further is scanned, it thereby is undeliverable. Point D. If said parcel is oversized and further has a postal zone short of 11 and further has a delivery window in excess of 71, it thereby is not undeliverable. Point E. If said parcel is scanned and further has a courier, it thereby is oversized. Point F. If said parcel is labeled and further has a courier and further has a barcode, it thereby is weighed. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is scanned and further is labeled. Point A is cancelled if said parcel has a postal zone of maximum 88. Point B is cancelled if said parcel has a courier. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Mirela is undeliverable. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016482", "pair_id": "u016482-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016482-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0ecb2952f680a7d5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016514-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not disputed. Wanda is litigated. Celeste is litigated. Celeste has no premium discount. Celeste has no roadside assistance. Wanda has roadside assistance. Celeste has no deductible waiver. Wanda has a premium discount. Wanda is subrogated. Edda is litigated. Edda has no deductible waiver. Edda has roadside assistance. Celeste is reinstated. Wanda is grandfathered. Edda is not subrogated. Edda is not grandfathered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is disputed, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point B. If said policyholder has no premium discount, it thereby has no flood coverage. Point C. If said policyholder has no flood coverage and further has a deductible waiver and further has a premium discount, it thereby is covered. Point D. If said policyholder has no flood coverage and further has no deductible waiver, it thereby is not covered. Point E. If said policyholder is grandfathered, it thereby is not indemnified. Point F. If said policyholder is subrogated and further is not disputed, it thereby is indemnified. Point G. If said policyholder is not reinstated, it thereby is retired. Point H. If said policyholder has a premium discount and further has no roadside assistance, it thereby is not retired. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is litigated and further has a deductible waiver. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder has no premium discount. Point F is cancelled if said policyholder is disputed. Point E supersedes Point F. Point G supersedes Point H. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Celeste is covered. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016514", "pair_id": "u016514-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016514-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "56a607cff9828706", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u016514-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not disputed. Wanda is litigated. Celeste is litigated. Celeste has no premium discount. Celeste has no roadside assistance. Wanda has roadside assistance. Celeste has no deductible waiver. Wanda has a premium discount. Wanda is subrogated. Edda is litigated. Edda has no deductible waiver. Edda has roadside assistance. Celeste is reinstated. Wanda is grandfathered. Edda is not subrogated. Edda is not grandfathered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is disputed, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point B. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby has no flood coverage. Point C. If said policyholder has no flood coverage and further has a deductible waiver and further has a premium discount, it thereby is covered. Point D. If said policyholder has no flood coverage and further has no deductible waiver, it thereby is not covered. Point E. If said policyholder is grandfathered, it thereby is not indemnified. Point F. If said policyholder is subrogated and further is not disputed, it thereby is indemnified. Point G. If said policyholder is not reinstated, it thereby is retired. Point H. If said policyholder has a premium discount and further has no roadside assistance, it thereby is not retired. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is litigated and further has a deductible waiver. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder has no premium discount. Point F is cancelled if said policyholder is disputed. Point E supersedes Point F. Point G supersedes Point H. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Celeste is covered. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016514", "pair_id": "u016514-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016514-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f5e9ebab1b669012", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u016526-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hedda is not relocating.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is relocating and further is seasoned, it thereby is unionized. Point B. If said candidate is relocating, it thereby is not fingerprinted. Point C. If said candidate is relocating, it thereby has no portfolio. Question: Statement: Hedda is not seasoned. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016526", "pair_id": "u016526-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016526-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "366f0ad966e93789", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016526-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hedda is not relocating. Hedda is seasoned.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is relocating and further is seasoned, it thereby is unionized. Point B. If said candidate is relocating, it thereby is not fingerprinted. Point C. If said candidate is relocating, it thereby has no portfolio. Question: Statement: Hedda is not seasoned. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016526", "pair_id": "u016526-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016526-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "06c760865fbe8a20", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016536-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is fasting. Gunnar is not fasting. Dorian is not allergic. Dorian has no caregiver. Vilja is not bedridden. Gunnar is not bedridden. Gunnar is hypertensive. Vilja is not hypertensive. Gunnar has a caregiver. Dorian is not hypertensive. Dorian is fasting. Dorian is not bedridden.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient has a fever reading of at least 71, then it has no chaperone. (2) If a patient is not bedridden, then it is not sedated. (3) If a patient is not allergic, then it is referred. (4) If a patient has a chaperone, then it is not anemic. (5) If a patient has a chaperone, then it is anemic. (6) If a patient is not sedated, then it has a chaperone. (7) If a patient is fasting, then it is not asthmatic. (8) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is asthmatic. (5) is void if the patient is hypertensive. (4) is void if the patient is not hypertensive. (1) is void if the patient has a caregiver. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. When (1) and (6) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Dorian is anemic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016536", "pair_id": "u016536-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016536-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d783fed4983b0a66", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u016536-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is fasting. Gunnar is not fasting. Dorian has a fever reading of 91. Dorian is not allergic. Dorian has no caregiver. Vilja is not bedridden. Gunnar is not bedridden. Gunnar is hypertensive. Vilja is not hypertensive. Gunnar has a caregiver. Dorian is not hypertensive. Dorian is fasting. Dorian is not bedridden.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient has a fever reading of at least 71, then it has no chaperone. (2) If a patient is not bedridden, then it is not sedated. (3) If a patient is not allergic, then it is referred. (4) If a patient has a chaperone, then it is not anemic. (5) If a patient has a chaperone, then it is anemic. (6) If a patient is not sedated, then it has a chaperone. (7) If a patient is fasting, then it is not asthmatic. (8) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is asthmatic. (5) is void if the patient is hypertensive. (4) is void if the patient is not hypertensive. (1) is void if the patient has a caregiver. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. When (1) and (6) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Dorian is anemic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016536", "pair_id": "u016536-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016536-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3f29883bb1d076ce", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u016536-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is fasting. Gunnar is not fasting. Dorian is not allergic. Dorian has no caregiver. Vilja is not bedridden. Gunnar is not bedridden. Gunnar is hypertensive. Vilja is not hypertensive. Gunnar has a caregiver. Dorian is not hypertensive. Dorian is fasting. Dorian is not bedridden.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a fever reading of 71 or more, it also has no chaperone. Clause 2: once any patient is not bedridden, it also is not sedated. Clause 3: once any patient is not allergic, it also is referred. Clause 4: once any patient has a chaperone, it also is not anemic. Clause 5: once any patient has a chaperone, it also is anemic. Clause 6: once any patient is not sedated, it also has a chaperone. Clause 7: once any patient is fasting, it also is not asthmatic. Clause 8: once any patient is hypertensive, it also is asthmatic. Clause 5 does not hold for a patient when any patient is hypertensive. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not hypertensive. Clause 1 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a caregiver. Clause 4 overrides Clause 5. Clause 8 overrides Clause 7. Clause 1 overrides Clause 6. Question: Does it follow that Dorian is anemic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016536", "pair_id": "u016536-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016536-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d783fed4983b0a66", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u016536-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is fasting. Gunnar is not fasting. Dorian has a fever reading of 91. Dorian is not allergic. Dorian has no caregiver. Vilja is not bedridden. Gunnar is not bedridden. Gunnar is hypertensive. Vilja is not hypertensive. Gunnar has a caregiver. Dorian is not hypertensive. Dorian is fasting. Dorian is not bedridden.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a fever reading of 71 or more, it also has no chaperone. Clause 2: once any patient is not bedridden, it also is not sedated. Clause 3: once any patient is not allergic, it also is referred. Clause 4: once any patient has a chaperone, it also is not anemic. Clause 5: once any patient has a chaperone, it also is anemic. Clause 6: once any patient is not sedated, it also has a chaperone. Clause 7: once any patient is fasting, it also is not asthmatic. Clause 8: once any patient is hypertensive, it also is asthmatic. Clause 5 does not hold for a patient when any patient is hypertensive. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not hypertensive. Clause 1 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a caregiver. Clause 4 overrides Clause 5. Clause 8 overrides Clause 7. Clause 1 overrides Clause 6. Question: Does it follow that Dorian is anemic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016536", "pair_id": "u016536-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016536-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3f29883bb1d076ce", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u016559-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid has a diploma. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 61. Mads has a signing bonus. Olek has no diploma. Lotte has a diploma. Lotte has a signing bonus. Lotte is fingerprinted. Olek is not fingerprinted. Sigrid has a signing bonus. Mads has no diploma. Lotte has a commute radius of 6. Olek has no signing bonus. Lotte has an aptitude quotient of 34.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is relocating, that candidate is not bonded. Item B. When the candidate has a signing bonus, that candidate is eligible. Item C. When the candidate is relocating, that candidate is bonded. Item D. When the candidate is fingerprinted, that candidate is relocating. Item E. When the candidate has a diploma, that candidate is seasoned. Item A is suspended when the candidate has an aptitude quotient of more than 15. Item C is suspended when the candidate has an aptitude quotient of no more than 15. Item D is suspended when the candidate has a commute radius of no less than 43. Item E is suspended when the candidate has an aptitude quotient of no less than 34. Question: Can one infer that Lotte is bonded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016559", "pair_id": "u016559-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016559-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a590020237fc8a44", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u016559-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid has a diploma. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 61. Mads has a signing bonus. Olek has no diploma. Lotte has a diploma. Lotte has a signing bonus. Lotte is fingerprinted. Olek is not fingerprinted. Sigrid has a signing bonus. Mads has no diploma. Lotte has a commute radius of 6. Olek has no signing bonus. Lotte has an aptitude quotient of 15.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is relocating, that candidate is not bonded. Item B. When the candidate has a signing bonus, that candidate is eligible. Item C. When the candidate is relocating, that candidate is bonded. Item D. When the candidate is fingerprinted, that candidate is relocating. Item E. When the candidate has a diploma, that candidate is seasoned. Item A is suspended when the candidate has an aptitude quotient of more than 15. Item C is suspended when the candidate has an aptitude quotient of no more than 15. Item D is suspended when the candidate has a commute radius of no less than 43. Item E is suspended when the candidate has an aptitude quotient of no less than 34. Question: Can one infer that Lotte is bonded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016559", "pair_id": "u016559-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016559-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "946a52b49bd99fde", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u016607-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is profiled. Quartz is not experimental. Quartz has a security advisory. Quartz is not merged.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is profiled, then it is benchmarked. (2) If a build is merged and is experimental, then it is notarized. (3) If a build is profiled and has a security advisory and is experimental, then it is compiled. Question: Is it true that Quartz has a changelog?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016607", "pair_id": "u016607-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016607-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "114f8dd76f14d9d8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016607-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz has no changelog. Quartz is profiled. Quartz is not experimental. Quartz has a security advisory. Quartz is not merged.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is profiled, then it is benchmarked. (2) If a build is merged and is experimental, then it is notarized. (3) If a build is profiled and has a security advisory and is experimental, then it is compiled. Question: Is it true that Quartz has a changelog?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016607", "pair_id": "u016607-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016607-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "f07ed6a24c22b5f5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016607-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is profiled. Quartz is not experimental. Quartz has a security advisory. Quartz is not merged.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is profiled, it also is benchmarked. Clause 2: once any build is merged and also is experimental, it also is notarized. Clause 3: once any build is profiled and also has a security advisory and also is experimental, it also is compiled. Question: Does it follow that Quartz has a changelog?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016607", "pair_id": "u016607-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016607-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "114f8dd76f14d9d8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016607-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz has no changelog. Quartz is profiled. Quartz is not experimental. Quartz has a security advisory. Quartz is not merged.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is profiled, it also is benchmarked. Clause 2: once any build is merged and also is experimental, it also is notarized. Clause 3: once any build is profiled and also has a security advisory and also is experimental, it also is compiled. Question: Does it follow that Quartz has a changelog?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016607", "pair_id": "u016607-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016607-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "f07ed6a24c22b5f5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016628-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is not disputed. Fabian is not bundled. Fabian has a peril factor of 93.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a peril factor of no less than 71, and is not disputed, and has a claim frequency of no less than 80, that policyholder is not lapsed. Item B. When the policyholder is disputed, and has a peril factor of more than 22, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Question: Can one infer that Fabian is not bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016628", "pair_id": "u016628-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016628-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "c233bd6d8dd07f31", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016628-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is disputed. Fabian is not bundled. Fabian has a peril factor of 93.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a peril factor of no less than 71, and is not disputed, and has a claim frequency of no less than 80, that policyholder is not lapsed. Item B. When the policyholder is disputed, and has a peril factor of more than 22, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Question: Can one infer that Fabian is not bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016628", "pair_id": "u016628-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016628-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "2083fcf006560db8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016633-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is peer reviewed. Betelgeuse is embargoed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is not resubmitted provided that it is embargoed. Section 2: a proposal is budgeted provided that it is not peer reviewed. Section 3: a proposal has industry backing provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 4: a proposal is theoretical provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 5: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it has seed funding. Section 6: a proposal has seed funding provided that it has industry backing. Section 7: a proposal has a postdoc provided that it is budgeted. Section 8: a proposal is a pilot study provided that it has a postdoc. Question: Which statement fits Betelgeuse?", "options": ["is longitudinal", "is a pilot study"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is longitudinal", "unit_id": "u016633", "pair_id": "u016633-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016633-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "ffdd068373a73166", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016633-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is peer reviewed. Betelgeuse is not embargoed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is not resubmitted provided that it is embargoed. Section 2: a proposal is budgeted provided that it is not peer reviewed. Section 3: a proposal has industry backing provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 4: a proposal is theoretical provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 5: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it has seed funding. Section 6: a proposal has seed funding provided that it has industry backing. Section 7: a proposal has a postdoc provided that it is budgeted. Section 8: a proposal is a pilot study provided that it has a postdoc. Question: Which statement fits Betelgeuse?", "options": ["is longitudinal", "is a pilot study"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is longitudinal", "unit_id": "u016633", "pair_id": "u016633-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016633-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "b9820383a33639d9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016642-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not multicenter. Capella is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is a pilot study provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 2: a proposal has no patent filing provided that it has a citation index of 15 or higher. Section 3: a proposal is not cofunded provided that it has seed funding. Section 4: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it is multicenter. Section 5: a proposal is not peer reviewed provided that it has seed funding. Section 6: a proposal is not a pilot study provided that it has seed funding. Section 7: a proposal has a patent filing provided that it is not interdisciplinary. Section 8: a proposal is cofunded provided that it has seed funding. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 7. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 8. Question: Capella is peer reviewed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016642", "pair_id": "u016642-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016642-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1963f9d47f73cb4a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016642-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not multicenter. Capella is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is a pilot study provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 2: a proposal has no patent filing provided that it has a citation index of 15 or higher. Section 3: a proposal is not cofunded provided that it has seed funding. Section 4: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it is multicenter. Section 5: a proposal is not peer reviewed provided that it has seed funding. Section 6: a proposal is not a pilot study provided that it has seed funding. Section 7: a proposal has a patent filing provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 8: a proposal is cofunded provided that it has seed funding. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 7. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 8. Question: Capella is peer reviewed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016642", "pair_id": "u016642-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016642-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b91a7964ee230331", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016642-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not multicenter. Capella is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed: then it is a pilot study. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has a citation index no lower than 15: then it has no patent filing. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is not cofunded. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is multicenter: then it is peer reviewed. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is not peer reviewed. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is not a pilot study. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal is not interdisciplinary: then it has a patent filing. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is cofunded. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VII. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy VIII. Question: Is it so that Capella is peer reviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016642", "pair_id": "u016642-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016642-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1963f9d47f73cb4a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016642-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not multicenter. Capella is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed: then it is a pilot study. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has a citation index no lower than 15: then it has no patent filing. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is not cofunded. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is multicenter: then it is peer reviewed. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is not peer reviewed. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is not a pilot study. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal is interdisciplinary: then it has a patent filing. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is cofunded. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VII. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy VIII. Question: Is it so that Capella is peer reviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016642", "pair_id": "u016642-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016642-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b91a7964ee230331", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016753-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke has a debt ratio of 42. Folke has an escrow account. Ilse has an escrow account. Evren is not underwritten. Ilse has a debt ratio of 22. Evren has a debt ratio of 50. Evren has a credit rating of 10. Hamid has a credit rating of 51. Ilse has a credit rating of 30. Evren is not vetted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has an escrow account, it also has a mortgage. Clause 2: once any borrower is not vetted, it also is overdrawn. Clause 3: once any borrower is foreclosed, it also is bankrupt. Clause 4: once any borrower is not underwritten, it also has no guarantor. Clause 5: once any borrower has a mortgage, it also is foreclosed. Clause 6: once any borrower is foreclosed, it also is not bankrupt. Clause 6 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a credit rating of 43 or more. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has an escrow account. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a credit rating under 43. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a debt ratio over 29. Question: Does it follow that Evren is not bankrupt?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016753", "pair_id": "u016753-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016753-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8f12d1239ea9a03b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u016753-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke has a debt ratio of 42. Folke has an escrow account. Ilse has an escrow account. Evren is not underwritten. Evren has an escrow account. Ilse has a debt ratio of 22. Evren has a debt ratio of 50. Evren has a credit rating of 10. Hamid has a credit rating of 51. Ilse has a credit rating of 30. Evren is not vetted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has an escrow account, it also has a mortgage. Clause 2: once any borrower is not vetted, it also is overdrawn. Clause 3: once any borrower is foreclosed, it also is bankrupt. Clause 4: once any borrower is not underwritten, it also has no guarantor. Clause 5: once any borrower has a mortgage, it also is foreclosed. Clause 6: once any borrower is foreclosed, it also is not bankrupt. Clause 6 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a credit rating of 43 or more. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has an escrow account. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a credit rating under 43. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a debt ratio over 29. Question: Does it follow that Evren is not bankrupt?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016753", "pair_id": "u016753-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016753-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "aadc2ae7055d5b62", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u016753-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke has a debt ratio of 42. Folke has an escrow account. Ilse has an escrow account. Evren is not underwritten. Ilse has a debt ratio of 22. Evren has a debt ratio of 50. Evren has a credit rating of 10. Hamid has a credit rating of 51. Ilse has a credit rating of 30. Evren is not vetted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower has an escrow account, that borrower has a mortgage. Item B. When the borrower is not vetted, that borrower is overdrawn. Item C. When the borrower is foreclosed, that borrower is bankrupt. Item D. When the borrower is not underwritten, that borrower has no guarantor. Item E. When the borrower has a mortgage, that borrower is foreclosed. Item F. When the borrower is foreclosed, that borrower is not bankrupt. Item F is suspended when the borrower has a credit rating of no less than 43. Item B is suspended when the borrower has an escrow account. Item C is suspended when the borrower has a credit rating of less than 43. Item E is suspended when the borrower has a debt ratio of more than 29. Question: Can one infer that Evren is not bankrupt?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016753", "pair_id": "u016753-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016753-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8f12d1239ea9a03b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u016753-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke has a debt ratio of 42. Folke has an escrow account. Ilse has an escrow account. Evren is not underwritten. Evren has an escrow account. Ilse has a debt ratio of 22. Evren has a debt ratio of 50. Evren has a credit rating of 10. Hamid has a credit rating of 51. Ilse has a credit rating of 30. Evren is not vetted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower has an escrow account, that borrower has a mortgage. Item B. When the borrower is not vetted, that borrower is overdrawn. Item C. When the borrower is foreclosed, that borrower is bankrupt. Item D. When the borrower is not underwritten, that borrower has no guarantor. Item E. When the borrower has a mortgage, that borrower is foreclosed. Item F. When the borrower is foreclosed, that borrower is not bankrupt. Item F is suspended when the borrower has a credit rating of no less than 43. Item B is suspended when the borrower has an escrow account. Item C is suspended when the borrower has a credit rating of less than 43. Item E is suspended when the borrower has a debt ratio of more than 29. Question: Can one infer that Evren is not bankrupt?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016753", "pair_id": "u016753-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016753-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "aadc2ae7055d5b62", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u016793-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has no courier. Mirela is not undeliverable. Mirela is labeled. Mirela is not scanned. Mirela is delayed. Mirela is not tracked. Mirela is not rerouted. Mirela is not prepaid. Mirela is not fragile.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is delayed while has no courier, thus it is not hazardous. Provision 2: when the parcel here is tracked while is scanned, thus it is not weighed. Provision 3: when the parcel here is delayed, thus it is weighed. Provision 4: when the parcel here is delayed while has a courier, thus it is hazardous. Provision 5: when the parcel here is hazardous while is not undeliverable, thus it is not registered. Provision 6: when the parcel here is undeliverable while is not fragile while is labeled, thus it is sealed. Provision 5 has no effect when the parcel here is delayed. Provision 1 has no effect when the parcel here is rerouted while is not delayed. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is undeliverable. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Mirela is not hazardous?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016793", "pair_id": "u016793-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016793-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ca0c7aad4c21114e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u016793-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has no courier. Mirela is not undeliverable. Mirela is labeled. Mirela is not scanned. Mirela is delayed. Mirela is not tracked. Mirela is not rerouted. Mirela is not prepaid. Mirela is not fragile.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is delayed while has no courier, thus it is not hazardous. Provision 2: when the parcel here is tracked while is scanned, thus it is not weighed. Provision 3: when the parcel here is not delayed, thus it is weighed. Provision 4: when the parcel here is delayed while has a courier, thus it is hazardous. Provision 5: when the parcel here is hazardous while is not undeliverable, thus it is not registered. Provision 6: when the parcel here is undeliverable while is not fragile while is labeled, thus it is sealed. Provision 5 has no effect when the parcel here is delayed. Provision 1 has no effect when the parcel here is rerouted while is not delayed. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is undeliverable. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Mirela is not hazardous?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016793", "pair_id": "u016793-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016793-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "40714352030bfd1d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u016794-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not localized. Galena is not localized. Galena is not versioned. Zircon is tagged. Zircon is not minified. Shale is localized.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is not localized, it also is compiled. Clause 2: once any build is not versioned, it also is merged. Clause 3: once any build is compiled, it also is reproducible. Clause 4: once any build is tagged, it also is flaky. Clause 5: once any build is compiled, it also is not reproducible. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build is tagged. Clause 5 does not hold for a build when any build is minified. Clause 4 does not hold for a build when any build is tagged. Clause 5 does not hold for a build when any build is not tagged. Clause 2 does not hold for a build when any build is tagged. Clause 3 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Zircon is reproducible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016794", "pair_id": "u016794-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016794-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c12ec8968c7c86c9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u016794-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not localized. Galena is not localized. Galena is not versioned. Zircon is tagged. Zircon is not minified. Shale is localized. Shale is not tagged.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is not localized, it also is compiled. Clause 2: once any build is not versioned, it also is merged. Clause 3: once any build is compiled, it also is reproducible. Clause 4: once any build is tagged, it also is flaky. Clause 5: once any build is compiled, it also is not reproducible. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build is tagged. Clause 5 does not hold for a build when any build is minified. Clause 4 does not hold for a build when any build is tagged. Clause 5 does not hold for a build when any build is not tagged. Clause 2 does not hold for a build when any build is tagged. Clause 3 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Zircon is reproducible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016794", "pair_id": "u016794-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016794-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "45d6cde3ba3d0b20", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u016814-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra has a memory allotment of 61. Orrery has a memory allotment of 84. Sierra has no public endpoint. Sierra is virtualized. Orrery is not virtualized. Orrery is throttled. Orrery is not backed up. Orrery has a public endpoint. Orrery is not sandboxed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is virtualized, it also is stateless. Clause 2: once any workload is backed up, it also is encrypted. Clause 3: once any workload is throttled, it also is not autoscaled. Clause 4: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is autoscaled. Clause 5: once any workload has a latency budget under 55, it also is idle. Clause 6: once any workload is containerized, it also has a firewall. Clause 7: once any workload is sandboxed, it also has a failover node. Clause 8: once any workload is sandboxed, it also is not cached. Clause 9: once any workload has a memory allotment under 83, it also is cached. Clause 10: once any workload has a memory allotment of 83 or more, it also has a GPU. Clause 11: once any workload has a memory allotment of 13 or less, it also is not idle. Clause 12: once any workload is virtualized, it also has no failover node. Clause 5 overrides Clause 11. Clause 12 overrides Clause 7. Clause 9 overrides Clause 8. Clause 3 overrides Clause 4. Question: Which of these is true of Orrery?", "options": ["is stateless", "has a GPU", "is cached", "is encrypted", "has a failover node"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a GPU", "unit_id": "u016814", "pair_id": "u016814-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016814-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ac04ba473cd95b05", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a15", "a4", "a3", "a7"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u016814-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra has a memory allotment of 61. Orrery has a memory allotment of 11. Sierra has no public endpoint. Sierra is virtualized. Orrery is not virtualized. Orrery is throttled. Orrery is not backed up. Orrery has a public endpoint. Orrery is not sandboxed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is virtualized, it also is stateless. Clause 2: once any workload is backed up, it also is encrypted. Clause 3: once any workload is throttled, it also is not autoscaled. Clause 4: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is autoscaled. Clause 5: once any workload has a latency budget under 55, it also is idle. Clause 6: once any workload is containerized, it also has a firewall. Clause 7: once any workload is sandboxed, it also has a failover node. Clause 8: once any workload is sandboxed, it also is not cached. Clause 9: once any workload has a memory allotment under 83, it also is cached. Clause 10: once any workload has a memory allotment of 83 or more, it also has a GPU. Clause 11: once any workload has a memory allotment of 13 or less, it also is not idle. Clause 12: once any workload is virtualized, it also has no failover node. Clause 5 overrides Clause 11. Clause 12 overrides Clause 7. Clause 9 overrides Clause 8. Clause 3 overrides Clause 4. Question: Which of these is true of Orrery?", "options": ["is stateless", "has a GPU", "is cached", "is encrypted", "has a failover node"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is cached", "unit_id": "u016814", "pair_id": "u016814-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016814-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f48d70a4c4268c74", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a15", "a4", "a3", "a7"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u016814-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra has a memory allotment of 61. Orrery has a memory allotment of 84. Sierra has no public endpoint. Sierra is virtualized. Orrery is not virtualized. Orrery is throttled. Orrery is not backed up. Orrery has a public endpoint. Orrery is not sandboxed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is virtualized, that workload is stateless. Item B. When the workload is backed up, that workload is encrypted. Item C. When the workload is throttled, that workload is not autoscaled. Item D. When the workload has a public endpoint, that workload is autoscaled. Item E. When the workload has a latency budget of less than 55, that workload is idle. Item F. When the workload is containerized, that workload has a firewall. Item G. When the workload is sandboxed, that workload has a failover node. Item H. When the workload is sandboxed, that workload is not cached. Item I. When the workload has a memory allotment of less than 83, that workload is cached. Item J. When the workload has a memory allotment of no less than 83, that workload has a GPU. Item K. When the workload has a memory allotment of no more than 13, that workload is not idle. Item L. When the workload is virtualized, that workload has no failover node. Item E outranks Item K. Item L outranks Item G. Item I outranks Item H. Item C outranks Item D. Question: What applies to Orrery?", "options": ["is stateless", "has a GPU", "is cached", "is encrypted", "has a failover node"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a GPU", "unit_id": "u016814", "pair_id": "u016814-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016814-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ac04ba473cd95b05", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a15", "a4", "a3", "a7"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u016814-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra has a memory allotment of 61. Orrery has a memory allotment of 11. Sierra has no public endpoint. Sierra is virtualized. Orrery is not virtualized. Orrery is throttled. Orrery is not backed up. Orrery has a public endpoint. Orrery is not sandboxed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is virtualized, that workload is stateless. Item B. When the workload is backed up, that workload is encrypted. Item C. When the workload is throttled, that workload is not autoscaled. Item D. When the workload has a public endpoint, that workload is autoscaled. Item E. When the workload has a latency budget of less than 55, that workload is idle. Item F. When the workload is containerized, that workload has a firewall. Item G. When the workload is sandboxed, that workload has a failover node. Item H. When the workload is sandboxed, that workload is not cached. Item I. When the workload has a memory allotment of less than 83, that workload is cached. Item J. When the workload has a memory allotment of no less than 83, that workload has a GPU. Item K. When the workload has a memory allotment of no more than 13, that workload is not idle. Item L. When the workload is virtualized, that workload has no failover node. Item E outranks Item K. Item L outranks Item G. Item I outranks Item H. Item C outranks Item D. Question: What applies to Orrery?", "options": ["is stateless", "has a GPU", "is cached", "is encrypted", "has a failover node"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is cached", "unit_id": "u016814", "pair_id": "u016814-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016814-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f48d70a4c4268c74", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a15", "a4", "a3", "a7"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u016856-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jasna is unionized. Noor is unionized. Kalle is seasoned. Kalle has no visa. Kalle is eligible. Jasna is eligible. Jasna is interviewed. Noor is seasoned. Mads is unionized. Mads is not interviewed. Jasna has a visa. Noor has no visa. Jasna is seasoned. Noor is not interviewed. Noor has no portfolio. Noor is eligible. Mads is not fingerprinted. Mads has a visa. Noor is headhunted. Kalle is headhunted.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is not interviewed, then it is not licensed. (2) If a candidate has no portfolio and is not unionized and is not interviewed, then it is recommended. (3) If a candidate is not eligible, then it has no mentor. (4) If a candidate is fingerprinted, then it has no mentor. (5) If a candidate is fingerprinted, then it is a veteran. (6) If a candidate is headhunted and is a graduate, then it is licensed. (7) If a candidate has no portfolio and is fingerprinted, then it is freelance. (8) If a candidate has no portfolio and has no visa and is fingerprinted, then it has a mentor. (9) If a candidate has no portfolio and is unionized and is seasoned, then it has a diploma. When (4) and (8) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (8) clash, (3) prevails. When (6) and (1) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Noor?", "options": ["is recommended", "is freelance", "has a diploma", "has a mentor"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a diploma", "unit_id": "u016856", "pair_id": "u016856-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016856-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6f7ace46d169b00d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a11", "a7", "a2"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u016856-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jasna is unionized. Noor is not unionized. Kalle is seasoned. Kalle has no visa. Kalle is eligible. Jasna is eligible. Jasna is interviewed. Noor is seasoned. Mads is unionized. Mads is not interviewed. Jasna has a visa. Noor has no visa. Jasna is seasoned. Noor is not interviewed. Noor has no portfolio. Noor is eligible. Mads is not fingerprinted. Mads has a visa. Noor is headhunted. Kalle is headhunted.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is not interviewed, then it is not licensed. (2) If a candidate has no portfolio and is not unionized and is not interviewed, then it is recommended. (3) If a candidate is not eligible, then it has no mentor. (4) If a candidate is fingerprinted, then it has no mentor. (5) If a candidate is fingerprinted, then it is a veteran. (6) If a candidate is headhunted and is a graduate, then it is licensed. (7) If a candidate has no portfolio and is fingerprinted, then it is freelance. (8) If a candidate has no portfolio and has no visa and is fingerprinted, then it has a mentor. (9) If a candidate has no portfolio and is unionized and is seasoned, then it has a diploma. When (4) and (8) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (8) clash, (3) prevails. When (6) and (1) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Noor?", "options": ["is recommended", "is freelance", "has a diploma", "has a mentor"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is recommended", "unit_id": "u016856", "pair_id": "u016856-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016856-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "057eac3bd6b2374b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a11", "a7", "a2"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u016856-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jasna is unionized. Noor is unionized. Kalle is seasoned. Kalle has no visa. Kalle is eligible. Jasna is eligible. Jasna is interviewed. Noor is seasoned. Mads is unionized. Mads is not interviewed. Jasna has a visa. Noor has no visa. Jasna is seasoned. Noor is not interviewed. Noor has no portfolio. Noor is eligible. Mads is not fingerprinted. Mads has a visa. Noor is headhunted. Kalle is headhunted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is not interviewed, that candidate is not licensed. Item B. When the candidate has no portfolio, and is not unionized, and is not interviewed, that candidate is recommended. Item C. When the candidate is not eligible, that candidate has no mentor. Item D. When the candidate is fingerprinted, that candidate has no mentor. Item E. When the candidate is fingerprinted, that candidate is a veteran. Item F. When the candidate is headhunted, and is a graduate, that candidate is licensed. Item G. When the candidate has no portfolio, and is fingerprinted, that candidate is freelance. Item H. When the candidate has no portfolio, and has no visa, and is fingerprinted, that candidate has a mentor. Item I. When the candidate has no portfolio, and is unionized, and is seasoned, that candidate has a diploma. Item D outranks Item H. Item C outranks Item H. Item F outranks Item A. Question: What applies to Noor?", "options": ["is recommended", "is freelance", "has a diploma", "has a mentor"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a diploma", "unit_id": "u016856", "pair_id": "u016856-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016856-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6f7ace46d169b00d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a11", "a7", "a2"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u016856-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jasna is unionized. Noor is not unionized. Kalle is seasoned. Kalle has no visa. Kalle is eligible. Jasna is eligible. Jasna is interviewed. Noor is seasoned. Mads is unionized. Mads is not interviewed. Jasna has a visa. Noor has no visa. Jasna is seasoned. Noor is not interviewed. Noor has no portfolio. Noor is eligible. Mads is not fingerprinted. Mads has a visa. Noor is headhunted. Kalle is headhunted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is not interviewed, that candidate is not licensed. Item B. When the candidate has no portfolio, and is not unionized, and is not interviewed, that candidate is recommended. Item C. When the candidate is not eligible, that candidate has no mentor. Item D. When the candidate is fingerprinted, that candidate has no mentor. Item E. When the candidate is fingerprinted, that candidate is a veteran. Item F. When the candidate is headhunted, and is a graduate, that candidate is licensed. Item G. When the candidate has no portfolio, and is fingerprinted, that candidate is freelance. Item H. When the candidate has no portfolio, and has no visa, and is fingerprinted, that candidate has a mentor. Item I. When the candidate has no portfolio, and is unionized, and is seasoned, that candidate has a diploma. Item D outranks Item H. Item C outranks Item H. Item F outranks Item A. Question: What applies to Noor?", "options": ["is recommended", "is freelance", "has a diploma", "has a mentor"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is recommended", "unit_id": "u016856", "pair_id": "u016856-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016856-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "057eac3bd6b2374b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a11", "a7", "a2"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u016858-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has flood coverage. Bruno is lapsed. Bruno has no flood coverage. Zdenek is not lapsed. Zdenek is not appraised. Bruno is not appraised. Bruno has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is not covered and also has no flood coverage and also has a dashcam, it also is indemnified. Clause 2: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also has a premium discount. Clause 3: once any policyholder is not lapsed, it also is not covered. Clause 4: once any policyholder is appraised, it also is subrogated. Clause 5: once any policyholder is not indemnified, it also is uninsurable. Clause 6: once any policyholder is not covered and also has flood coverage, it also is not indemnified. Question: Does it follow that Zdenek is indemnified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016858", "pair_id": "u016858-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016858-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "d17398b6d790912d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 51}}
{"id": "syn-u016858-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has flood coverage. Bruno is lapsed. Bruno has no flood coverage. Zdenek is not lapsed. Zdenek is not appraised. Bruno is not appraised. Bruno has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is not covered and also has no flood coverage and also has a dashcam, it also is indemnified. Clause 2: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also has a premium discount. Clause 3: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is not covered. Clause 4: once any policyholder is appraised, it also is subrogated. Clause 5: once any policyholder is not indemnified, it also is uninsurable. Clause 6: once any policyholder is not covered and also has flood coverage, it also is not indemnified. Question: Does it follow that Zdenek is indemnified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016858", "pair_id": "u016858-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016858-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "82ce3dc3ddc25086", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 51}}
{"id": "syn-u016858-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has flood coverage. Bruno is lapsed. Bruno has no flood coverage. Zdenek is not lapsed. Zdenek is not appraised. Bruno is not appraised. Bruno has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is not covered, and has no flood coverage, and has a dashcam, that policyholder is indemnified. Item B. When the policyholder has flood coverage, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item C. When the policyholder is not lapsed, that policyholder is not covered. Item D. When the policyholder is appraised, that policyholder is subrogated. Item E. When the policyholder is not indemnified, that policyholder is uninsurable. Item F. When the policyholder is not covered, and has flood coverage, that policyholder is not indemnified. Question: Can one infer that Zdenek is indemnified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016858", "pair_id": "u016858-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016858-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "d17398b6d790912d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 51}}
{"id": "syn-u016858-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has flood coverage. Bruno is lapsed. Bruno has no flood coverage. Zdenek is not lapsed. Zdenek is not appraised. Bruno is not appraised. Bruno has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is not covered, and has no flood coverage, and has a dashcam, that policyholder is indemnified. Item B. When the policyholder has flood coverage, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item C. When the policyholder is lapsed, that policyholder is not covered. Item D. When the policyholder is appraised, that policyholder is subrogated. Item E. When the policyholder is not indemnified, that policyholder is uninsurable. Item F. When the policyholder is not covered, and has flood coverage, that policyholder is not indemnified. Question: Can one infer that Zdenek is indemnified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016858", "pair_id": "u016858-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016858-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "82ce3dc3ddc25086", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 51}}
{"id": "syn-u016924-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has a payout ceiling of 65. Fabian is subrogated. Fabian has a claim frequency of 57. Fabian has a peril factor of 88. Fabian is bundled. Fabian has roadside assistance. Fabian is not uninsurable. Fabian is not grandfathered. Fabian has a premium band of 22.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is inspected plus has a premium band smaller than 19 plus has roadside assistance: then it has flood coverage. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has a payout ceiling no lower than 64: then it is a claimant. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is bundled plus has roadside assistance plus has a premium band no higher than 47: then it is inspected. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is inspected plus has a premium band no lower than 19: then it has no flood coverage. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has a peril factor higher than 31 plus has a premium band no lower than 59: then it has no deductible waiver. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is subrogated plus is uninsurable plus has a claim frequency no higher than 21: then it is indemnified. Policy II is waived if that policyholder has a claim frequency no higher than 41. Policy IV is waived if that policyholder has a claim frequency smaller than 67 plus is grandfathered. Question: Is it so that Fabian has no flood coverage?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016924", "pair_id": "u016924-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016924-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fd42870417037ab9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u016924-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has a payout ceiling of 2. Fabian is subrogated. Fabian has a claim frequency of 57. Fabian has a peril factor of 88. Fabian is bundled. Fabian has roadside assistance. Fabian is not uninsurable. Fabian is not grandfathered. Fabian has a premium band of 22.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is inspected plus has a premium band smaller than 19 plus has roadside assistance: then it has flood coverage. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has a payout ceiling no lower than 64: then it is a claimant. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is bundled plus has roadside assistance plus has a premium band no higher than 47: then it is inspected. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is inspected plus has a premium band no lower than 19: then it has no flood coverage. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has a peril factor higher than 31 plus has a premium band no lower than 59: then it has no deductible waiver. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is subrogated plus is uninsurable plus has a claim frequency no higher than 21: then it is indemnified. Policy II is waived if that policyholder has a claim frequency no higher than 41. Policy IV is waived if that policyholder has a claim frequency smaller than 67 plus is grandfathered. Question: Is it so that Fabian has no flood coverage?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016924", "pair_id": "u016924-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016924-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b9749139dbcde75c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u016927-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has a memory allotment of 90. Nimbus is provisioned. Nimbus is not virtualized. Juno is isolated. Juno is not replicated. Nimbus is not replicated. Juno is not virtualized. Nimbus is isolated. Juno is provisioned.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is encrypted provided that it is not virtualized as well as is provisioned as well as has a memory allotment of 65 or higher. Section 2: a workload is not encrypted provided that it is virtualized as well as has a memory allotment of 36 or higher as well as is not isolated. Section 3: a workload is not idle provided that it is replicated as well as is not virtualized. Question: Nimbus is encrypted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016927", "pair_id": "u016927-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016927-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "ff6851c35df9af47", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016927-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has a memory allotment of 90. Nimbus is provisioned. Nimbus is not virtualized. Juno is isolated. Juno is not replicated. Nimbus is not replicated. Juno is not virtualized. Nimbus is isolated. Juno is provisioned.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is encrypted provided that it is virtualized as well as is provisioned as well as has a memory allotment of 65 or higher. Section 2: a workload is not encrypted provided that it is virtualized as well as has a memory allotment of 36 or higher as well as is not isolated. Section 3: a workload is not idle provided that it is replicated as well as is not virtualized. Question: Nimbus is encrypted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016927", "pair_id": "u016927-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016927-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "910dddd8f0f63e6e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016927-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has a memory allotment of 90. Nimbus is provisioned. Nimbus is not virtualized. Juno is isolated. Juno is not replicated. Nimbus is not replicated. Juno is not virtualized. Nimbus is isolated. Juno is provisioned.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is not virtualized plus is provisioned plus has a memory allotment no lower than 65: then it is encrypted. Policy II. Suppose that workload is virtualized plus has a memory allotment no lower than 36 plus is not isolated: then it is not encrypted. Policy III. Suppose that workload is replicated plus is not virtualized: then it is not idle. Question: Is it so that Nimbus is encrypted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u016927", "pair_id": "u016927-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016927-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "ff6851c35df9af47", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016927-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has a memory allotment of 90. Nimbus is provisioned. Nimbus is not virtualized. Juno is isolated. Juno is not replicated. Nimbus is not replicated. Juno is not virtualized. Nimbus is isolated. Juno is provisioned.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is virtualized plus is provisioned plus has a memory allotment no lower than 65: then it is encrypted. Policy II. Suppose that workload is virtualized plus has a memory allotment no lower than 36 plus is not isolated: then it is not encrypted. Policy III. Suppose that workload is replicated plus is not virtualized: then it is not idle. Question: Is it so that Nimbus is encrypted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016927", "pair_id": "u016927-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016927-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "910dddd8f0f63e6e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016953-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is weighed. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 2. Rasmus is consolidated. Rasmus is refrigerated. Rasmus has a postal zone of 64. Rasmus has a delivery window of 31. Rasmus has a weight class of 63.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is consolidated and further has a parcel volume of maximum 10 and further has a weight class of maximum 71, it thereby has no waybill. Point B. If said parcel has a postal zone of maximum 63, it thereby has a courier. Point C. If said parcel is consolidated and further has a parcel volume in excess of 10, it thereby has a waybill. Point D. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby is delayed. Point E. If said parcel is weighed and further is fragile and further is consolidated, it thereby is prepaid. Point D is cancelled if said parcel has a weight class of minimum 83. Point C is cancelled if said parcel has a delivery window of maximum 84 and further has a parcel volume short of 31. Point A is cancelled if said parcel has a delivery window of maximum 75 and further has a barcode. Question: Statement: Rasmus has a waybill. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016953", "pair_id": "u016953-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016953-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e17f684bd117b5ed", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 30}}
{"id": "syn-u016953-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is weighed. Rasmus has a parcel volume of 2. Rasmus is consolidated. Rasmus is refrigerated. Rasmus has a postal zone of 60. Rasmus has a delivery window of 31. Rasmus has a weight class of 63.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is consolidated and further has a parcel volume of maximum 10 and further has a weight class of maximum 71, it thereby has no waybill. Point B. If said parcel has a postal zone of maximum 63, it thereby has a courier. Point C. If said parcel is consolidated and further has a parcel volume in excess of 10, it thereby has a waybill. Point D. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby is delayed. Point E. If said parcel is weighed and further is fragile and further is consolidated, it thereby is prepaid. Point D is cancelled if said parcel has a weight class of minimum 83. Point C is cancelled if said parcel has a delivery window of maximum 84 and further has a parcel volume short of 31. Point A is cancelled if said parcel has a delivery window of maximum 75 and further has a barcode. Question: Statement: Rasmus has a waybill. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016953", "pair_id": "u016953-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u016953-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5dd4c538086b452c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 30}}
{"id": "syn-u016994-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is not uninsurable. Zdenek is retired. Yara is not reinstated. Yara is not retired. Zdenek is appraised. Yara has a dashcam. Yara is covered.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is not uninsurable while is reinstated while has a dashcam, thus it is lapsed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is subrogated. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is retired while is covered, thus it is disputed. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is uninsurable while is not reinstated while has a dashcam, thus it is not lapsed. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is appraised, thus it has no adjuster. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is not disputed. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Yara is lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016994", "pair_id": "u016994-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016994-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "04a84fea954dad0e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016994-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is not uninsurable. Zdenek is retired. Yara is not reinstated. Yara is not retired. Zdenek is appraised. Yara has a dashcam. Yara is covered.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is not uninsurable while is reinstated while has a dashcam, thus it is lapsed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is subrogated. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is retired while is covered, thus it is disputed. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is not uninsurable while is not reinstated while has a dashcam, thus it is not lapsed. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is appraised, thus it has no adjuster. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is not disputed. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Yara is lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016994", "pair_id": "u016994-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016994-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "eb5c3d6d2afdcd64", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016994-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is not uninsurable. Zdenek is retired. Yara is not reinstated. Yara is not retired. Zdenek is appraised. Yara has a dashcam. Yara is covered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is not uninsurable and further is reinstated and further has a dashcam, it thereby is lapsed. Point B. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby is subrogated. Point C. If said policyholder is retired and further is covered, it thereby is disputed. Point D. If said policyholder is uninsurable and further is not reinstated and further has a dashcam, it thereby is not lapsed. Point E. If said policyholder is appraised, it thereby has no adjuster. Point F. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby is not disputed. Point A supersedes Point D. Point F supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Yara is lapsed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016994", "pair_id": "u016994-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016994-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "04a84fea954dad0e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016994-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is not uninsurable. Zdenek is retired. Yara is not reinstated. Yara is not retired. Zdenek is appraised. Yara has a dashcam. Yara is covered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is not uninsurable and further is reinstated and further has a dashcam, it thereby is lapsed. Point B. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby is subrogated. Point C. If said policyholder is retired and further is covered, it thereby is disputed. Point D. If said policyholder is not uninsurable and further is not reinstated and further has a dashcam, it thereby is not lapsed. Point E. If said policyholder is appraised, it thereby has no adjuster. Point F. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby is not disputed. Point A supersedes Point D. Point F supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Yara is lapsed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016994", "pair_id": "u016994-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016994-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "eb5c3d6d2afdcd64", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016994-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is not uninsurable. Zdenek is retired. Yara is not reinstated. Yara is not retired. Zdenek is appraised. Yara has a dashcam. Yara is covered.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is not uninsurable and likewise is reinstated and likewise has a dashcam, so it is lapsed. No. 2 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it is subrogated. No. 3 While the given policyholder is retired and likewise is covered, so it is disputed. No. 4 While the given policyholder is uninsurable and likewise is not reinstated and likewise has a dashcam, so it is not lapsed. No. 5 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it has no adjuster. No. 6 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it is not disputed. No. 1 wins over No. 4. No. 6 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Yara is lapsed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u016994", "pair_id": "u016994-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016994-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "04a84fea954dad0e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u016994-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is not uninsurable. Zdenek is retired. Yara is not reinstated. Yara is not retired. Zdenek is appraised. Yara has a dashcam. Yara is covered.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is not uninsurable and likewise is reinstated and likewise has a dashcam, so it is lapsed. No. 2 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it is subrogated. No. 3 While the given policyholder is retired and likewise is covered, so it is disputed. No. 4 While the given policyholder is not uninsurable and likewise is not reinstated and likewise has a dashcam, so it is not lapsed. No. 5 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it has no adjuster. No. 6 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it is not disputed. No. 1 wins over No. 4. No. 6 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Yara is lapsed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u016994", "pair_id": "u016994-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u016994-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "eb5c3d6d2afdcd64", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017008-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has a payout ceiling of 13. Celeste has no dashcam.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has no dashcam, it then has roadside assistance. #2 Each time a policyholder has no adjuster, it then is lapsed. #3 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling of 84 or above, it then is covered. #4 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling of 14 or below, it then is reimbursed. #5 Each time a policyholder has a dashcam, it then is indemnified. #6 Each time a policyholder is uninsurable, it then is appraised. #7 Each time a policyholder is covered, it then has no adjuster. #8 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling less than 84, it then has no beneficiary. #9 Each time a policyholder has no beneficiary, it then is uninsurable. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Celeste?", "options": ["is appraised", "is lapsed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is appraised", "unit_id": "u017008", "pair_id": "u017008-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017008-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "aaa5a8d6bc43eb07", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a7"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017008-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has a payout ceiling of 32. Celeste has no dashcam.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has no dashcam, it then has roadside assistance. #2 Each time a policyholder has no adjuster, it then is lapsed. #3 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling of 84 or above, it then is covered. #4 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling of 14 or below, it then is reimbursed. #5 Each time a policyholder has a dashcam, it then is indemnified. #6 Each time a policyholder is uninsurable, it then is appraised. #7 Each time a policyholder is covered, it then has no adjuster. #8 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling less than 84, it then has no beneficiary. #9 Each time a policyholder has no beneficiary, it then is uninsurable. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Celeste?", "options": ["is appraised", "is lapsed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is appraised", "unit_id": "u017008", "pair_id": "u017008-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017008-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "c07fc7ceb42af8f2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a7"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017070-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not a graduate. Ivo has a notice period of 97. Kalle has a seniority step of 56. Petra has a seniority step of 49. Ivo is not relocating. Ivo is not eligible. Petra is eligible. Kalle has a notice period of 98. Petra is not a graduate. Kalle is not relocating. Kalle has a background screening. Kalle has a signing bonus. Kalle is a graduate.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is a graduate, that candidate is freelance. Item B. When the candidate is bonded, that candidate is not freelance. Item C. When the candidate has a seniority step of no more than 48, and has a background screening, and has a signing bonus, that candidate is not bonded. Item D. When the candidate is a graduate, that candidate has a portfolio. Item E. When the candidate is relocating, and is a graduate, and has a background screening, that candidate is not sponsored. Item F. When the candidate has a notice period of no more than 78, that candidate is sponsored. Item G. When the candidate has a seniority step of more than 13, and is eligible, that candidate has no portfolio. Item H. When the candidate has a seniority step of no more than 66, and has a signing bonus, that candidate is bonded. Item A outranks Item B. Item G outranks Item D. Item C outranks Item H. Item F outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Kalle is not bonded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017070", "pair_id": "u017070-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017070-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "60304b9013d7b972", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017070-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not a graduate. Ivo has a notice period of 97. Kalle has a seniority step of 56. Petra has a seniority step of 49. Ivo is not relocating. Ivo is not eligible. Petra is eligible. Kalle has a notice period of 98. Petra is not a graduate. Kalle is not relocating. Kalle has a background screening. Kalle has a signing bonus. Kalle is a graduate.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is a graduate, that candidate is freelance. Item B. When the candidate is bonded, that candidate is not freelance. Item C. When the candidate has a seniority step of no more than 66, and has a background screening, and has a signing bonus, that candidate is not bonded. Item D. When the candidate is a graduate, that candidate has a portfolio. Item E. When the candidate is relocating, and is a graduate, and has a background screening, that candidate is not sponsored. Item F. When the candidate has a notice period of no more than 78, that candidate is sponsored. Item G. When the candidate has a seniority step of more than 13, and is eligible, that candidate has no portfolio. Item H. When the candidate has a seniority step of no more than 66, and has a signing bonus, that candidate is bonded. Item A outranks Item B. Item G outranks Item D. Item C outranks Item H. Item F outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Kalle is not bonded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017070", "pair_id": "u017070-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017070-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0150c93496a126c8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017092-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quasar has a replica count of 78. Quasar has a GPU. Tundra is sandboxed. Kestrel has a GPU. Tundra is replicated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is sandboxed, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 2: when the workload here is deprecated, thus it is autoscaled. Provision 3: when the workload here has no GPU, thus it is not mirrored. Provision 4: when the workload here has a firewall, thus it is deprecated. Provision 5: when the workload here has a replica count beyond 43, thus it has a firewall. Provision 6: when the workload here is idle, thus it has a failover node. Provision 7: when the workload here is provisioned, thus it is isolated. Provision 8: when the workload here is not sandboxed, thus it is provisioned. Provision 9: when the workload here is replicated, thus it is idle. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here is not sandboxed. Provision 2 has no effect when the workload here is sandboxed. Question: Which one describes Quasar?", "options": ["is deprecated", "has a failover node", "is isolated"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is deprecated", "unit_id": "u017092", "pair_id": "u017092-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017092-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8dfe222582ccccef", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a12", "a0"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017092-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quasar has a replica count of 78. Quasar has a GPU. Tundra is sandboxed. Kestrel has a GPU. Tundra is replicated. Quasar is not sandboxed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is sandboxed, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 2: when the workload here is deprecated, thus it is autoscaled. Provision 3: when the workload here has no GPU, thus it is not mirrored. Provision 4: when the workload here has a firewall, thus it is deprecated. Provision 5: when the workload here has a replica count beyond 43, thus it has a firewall. Provision 6: when the workload here is idle, thus it has a failover node. Provision 7: when the workload here is provisioned, thus it is isolated. Provision 8: when the workload here is not sandboxed, thus it is provisioned. Provision 9: when the workload here is replicated, thus it is idle. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here is not sandboxed. Provision 2 has no effect when the workload here is sandboxed. Question: Which one describes Quasar?", "options": ["is deprecated", "has a failover node", "is isolated"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is isolated", "unit_id": "u017092", "pair_id": "u017092-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017092-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b94fefd8c7bc6b7f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a12", "a0"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017117-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is not renewed. Hadar is renewed. Hadar is budgeted. Hadar is not endorsed. Hadar is resubmitted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is not budgeted and further is renewed and further is resubmitted, it thereby is peer reviewed. Point B. If said proposal is peer reviewed, it thereby is shortlisted. Point C. If said proposal is not budgeted and further is not renewed and further is resubmitted, it thereby is not peer reviewed. Point D. If said proposal has no seed funding, it thereby is not a pilot study. Point E. If said proposal is not endorsed and further is renewed, it thereby is embargoed. Question: Statement: Hadar is not peer reviewed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017117", "pair_id": "u017117-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017117-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "c72271220c40569a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 19}}
{"id": "syn-u017117-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is not renewed. Hadar is renewed. Hadar is budgeted. Hadar is not endorsed. Hadar is resubmitted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is not budgeted and further is renewed and further is resubmitted, it thereby is peer reviewed. Point B. If said proposal is peer reviewed, it thereby is shortlisted. Point C. If said proposal is not budgeted and further is not renewed and further is resubmitted, it thereby is not peer reviewed. Point D. If said proposal has no seed funding, it thereby is not a pilot study. Point E. If said proposal is not endorsed and further is not renewed, it thereby is embargoed. Question: Statement: Hadar is not peer reviewed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017117", "pair_id": "u017117-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017117-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "5f6bd2755dce5620", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 19}}
{"id": "syn-u017134-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is lapsed. Agata is not retired. Wanda is not inspected. Viggo has a rider. Wanda is not retired. Agata is not lapsed. Agata is not inspected. Viggo is not grandfathered. Agata is not grandfathered. Wanda has a rider.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a rider, it also is bundled. Clause 2: once any policyholder is grandfathered, it also is subrogated. Clause 3: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is not bundled. Clause 4: once any policyholder is not bundled, it also has a deductible waiver. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a rider, it also is not subrogated. Clause 6: once any policyholder is bundled, it also has no deductible waiver. Clause 4 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is inspected. Clause 6 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is lapsed. Clause 6 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is retired. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Clause 6 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Wanda has a deductible waiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017134", "pair_id": "u017134-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017134-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fc14c7d6ee7dce54", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u017134-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is lapsed. Agata is not retired. Wanda is not inspected. Viggo has a rider. Wanda is not retired. Agata is not lapsed. Agata is not inspected. Viggo is not grandfathered. Agata is not grandfathered. Wanda has a rider.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a rider, it also is bundled. Clause 2: once any policyholder is grandfathered, it also is subrogated. Clause 3: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is not bundled. Clause 4: once any policyholder is bundled, it also has a deductible waiver. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a rider, it also is not subrogated. Clause 6: once any policyholder is bundled, it also has no deductible waiver. Clause 4 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is inspected. Clause 6 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is lapsed. Clause 6 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is retired. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Clause 6 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Wanda has a deductible waiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017134", "pair_id": "u017134-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017134-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d6d819d96c0db7fb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u017218-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rune is fingerprinted. Noor is not sponsored. Petra is fingerprinted. Petra is not bonded. Petra is headhunted. Noor is headhunted. Rune is not sponsored. Noor is not bonded.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is bonded, it then is probationary. #2 Each time a candidate is not sponsored, it then is onboarded. #3 Each time a candidate is licensed, it then has a signing bonus. #4 Each time a candidate is fingerprinted, it then has a portfolio. #5 Each time a candidate is sponsored, it then is freelance. #6 Each time a candidate is bilingual, it then is eligible. #7 Each time a candidate is not bilingual, it then is licensed. #8 Each time a candidate is headhunted, it then is interviewed. #9 Each time a candidate is not fingerprinted, it then is seasoned. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Noor?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is onboarded", "is freelance", "has a portfolio", "is probationary", "is eligible", "is licensed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is onboarded", "unit_id": "u017218", "pair_id": "u017218-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017218-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "9ca02282f8cc6ead", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a6", "a9", "a13", "a8", "a2", "a3"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017218-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rune is fingerprinted. Noor is sponsored. Petra is fingerprinted. Petra is not bonded. Petra is headhunted. Noor is headhunted. Rune is not sponsored. Noor is not bonded.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is bonded, it then is probationary. #2 Each time a candidate is not sponsored, it then is onboarded. #3 Each time a candidate is licensed, it then has a signing bonus. #4 Each time a candidate is fingerprinted, it then has a portfolio. #5 Each time a candidate is sponsored, it then is freelance. #6 Each time a candidate is bilingual, it then is eligible. #7 Each time a candidate is not bilingual, it then is licensed. #8 Each time a candidate is headhunted, it then is interviewed. #9 Each time a candidate is not fingerprinted, it then is seasoned. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Noor?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is onboarded", "is freelance", "has a portfolio", "is probationary", "is eligible", "is licensed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is freelance", "unit_id": "u017218", "pair_id": "u017218-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017218-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "4a96080bd7d25a14", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a6", "a9", "a13", "a8", "a2", "a3"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017243-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is tested. Mica is linted. Pumice is not tested. Talc is not tested.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is not linted, it then is backported. #2 Each time a build is not versioned, it then is not backported. #1 is set aside if a build is versioned. #1 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Talc is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017243", "pair_id": "u017243-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017243-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8cc8da82ea42ecca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017243-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is tested. Talc is linted. Mica is linted. Pumice is not tested. Talc is not tested.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is not linted, it then is backported. #2 Each time a build is not versioned, it then is not backported. #1 is set aside if a build is versioned. #1 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Talc is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017243", "pair_id": "u017243-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017243-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "922309c5a6115208", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017252-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Lotte is not relocating. Lotte has a notice period of 91. Lotte is not probationary. Lotte is unionized. Lotte is a veteran. Lotte has a seniority step of 93. Lotte is eligible. Lotte has a visa.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not licensed provided that it is certified. Section 2: a candidate has a portfolio provided that it has a notice period lower than 60. Section 3: a candidate has a signing bonus provided that it has a mentor as well as has a notice period exceeding 84. Section 4: a candidate is sponsored provided that it has a mentor as well as is relocating. Section 5: a candidate has no mentor provided that it has a seniority step of 24 or higher. Section 6: a candidate has a mentor provided that it is eligible as well as is a veteran as well as has a visa. Section 7: a candidate is certified provided that it has a mentor as well as has a notice period of 84 or lower as well as has a portfolio. Section 8: a candidate is freelance provided that it is unionized as well as is probationary. Section 9: a candidate has no diploma provided that it is a veteran. Section 10: a candidate has a diploma provided that it is probationary. Section 9 lapses for a candidate if it is probationary. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 10. Question: Which statement fits Lotte?", "options": ["is sponsored", "is certified", "has a signing bonus"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a signing bonus", "unit_id": "u017252", "pair_id": "u017252-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017252-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a5ca5777d7124258", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a13", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017252-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Lotte is not relocating. Lotte has a notice period of 32. Lotte is not probationary. Lotte is unionized. Lotte is a veteran. Lotte has a seniority step of 93. Lotte is eligible. Lotte has a visa.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not licensed provided that it is certified. Section 2: a candidate has a portfolio provided that it has a notice period lower than 60. Section 3: a candidate has a signing bonus provided that it has a mentor as well as has a notice period exceeding 84. Section 4: a candidate is sponsored provided that it has a mentor as well as is relocating. Section 5: a candidate has no mentor provided that it has a seniority step of 24 or higher. Section 6: a candidate has a mentor provided that it is eligible as well as is a veteran as well as has a visa. Section 7: a candidate is certified provided that it has a mentor as well as has a notice period of 84 or lower as well as has a portfolio. Section 8: a candidate is freelance provided that it is unionized as well as is probationary. Section 9: a candidate has no diploma provided that it is a veteran. Section 10: a candidate has a diploma provided that it is probationary. Section 9 lapses for a candidate if it is probationary. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 10. Question: Which statement fits Lotte?", "options": ["is sponsored", "is certified", "has a signing bonus"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is certified", "unit_id": "u017252", "pair_id": "u017252-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017252-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "71601e698bf5daff", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a13", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017252-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Lotte is not relocating. Lotte has a notice period of 91. Lotte is not probationary. Lotte is unionized. Lotte is a veteran. Lotte has a seniority step of 93. Lotte is eligible. Lotte has a visa.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is certified, it then is not licensed. #2 Each time a candidate has a notice period less than 60, it then has a portfolio. #3 Each time a candidate has a mentor and additionally has a notice period greater than 84, it then has a signing bonus. #4 Each time a candidate has a mentor and additionally is relocating, it then is sponsored. #5 Each time a candidate has a seniority step of 24 or above, it then has no mentor. #6 Each time a candidate is eligible and additionally is a veteran and additionally has a visa, it then has a mentor. #7 Each time a candidate has a mentor and additionally has a notice period of 84 or below and additionally has a portfolio, it then is certified. #8 Each time a candidate is unionized and additionally is probationary, it then is freelance. #9 Each time a candidate is a veteran, it then has no diploma. #10 Each time a candidate is probationary, it then has a diploma. #9 is set aside if a candidate is probationary. #5 yields to #6. #10 yields to #9. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Lotte?", "options": ["is sponsored", "is certified", "has a signing bonus"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a signing bonus", "unit_id": "u017252", "pair_id": "u017252-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017252-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a5ca5777d7124258", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a13", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017252-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Lotte is not relocating. Lotte has a notice period of 32. Lotte is not probationary. Lotte is unionized. Lotte is a veteran. Lotte has a seniority step of 93. Lotte is eligible. Lotte has a visa.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is certified, it then is not licensed. #2 Each time a candidate has a notice period less than 60, it then has a portfolio. #3 Each time a candidate has a mentor and additionally has a notice period greater than 84, it then has a signing bonus. #4 Each time a candidate has a mentor and additionally is relocating, it then is sponsored. #5 Each time a candidate has a seniority step of 24 or above, it then has no mentor. #6 Each time a candidate is eligible and additionally is a veteran and additionally has a visa, it then has a mentor. #7 Each time a candidate has a mentor and additionally has a notice period of 84 or below and additionally has a portfolio, it then is certified. #8 Each time a candidate is unionized and additionally is probationary, it then is freelance. #9 Each time a candidate is a veteran, it then has no diploma. #10 Each time a candidate is probationary, it then has a diploma. #9 is set aside if a candidate is probationary. #5 yields to #6. #10 yields to #9. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Lotte?", "options": ["is sponsored", "is certified", "has a signing bonus"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is certified", "unit_id": "u017252", "pair_id": "u017252-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017252-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "71601e698bf5daff", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a13", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017255-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads has a diploma. Sigrid is bonded. Mads is recommended. Mads is not bonded. Sigrid has a diploma. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 94. Sigrid is not recommended. Mads has an aptitude quotient of 97. Sigrid is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is sponsored, thus it is headhunted. Provision 2: when the candidate here is not sponsored, thus it is not headhunted. Provision 3: when the candidate here has an aptitude quotient at or below 18, thus it is probationary. Provision 4: when the candidate here has a diploma, thus it is onboarded. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here is bonded. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is recommended. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is not bonded. Provision 3 has no effect when the candidate here has a diploma. Question: Would it be right to say that Sigrid is headhunted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017255", "pair_id": "u017255-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017255-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "64949c829d0ee075", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017255-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads has a diploma. Sigrid is bonded. Mads is recommended. Mads is not bonded. Sigrid has a diploma. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 94. Sigrid is not recommended. Mads has an aptitude quotient of 97. Sigrid is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is sponsored, thus it is headhunted. Provision 2: when the candidate here is sponsored, thus it is not headhunted. Provision 3: when the candidate here has an aptitude quotient at or below 18, thus it is probationary. Provision 4: when the candidate here has a diploma, thus it is onboarded. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here is bonded. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is recommended. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is not bonded. Provision 3 has no effect when the candidate here has a diploma. Question: Would it be right to say that Sigrid is headhunted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017255", "pair_id": "u017255-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017255-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1e8aa1054aeb3818", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017255-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads has a diploma. Sigrid is bonded. Mads is recommended. Mads is not bonded. Sigrid has a diploma. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 94. Sigrid is not recommended. Mads has an aptitude quotient of 97. Sigrid is not sponsored.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it is headhunted. No. 2 While the given candidate is not sponsored, so it is not headhunted. No. 3 While the given candidate has an aptitude quotient not above 18, so it is probationary. No. 4 While the given candidate has a diploma, so it is onboarded. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given candidate is bonded. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is recommended. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is not bonded. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a diploma. Question: Is the claim \"Sigrid is headhunted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017255", "pair_id": "u017255-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017255-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "64949c829d0ee075", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017255-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads has a diploma. Sigrid is bonded. Mads is recommended. Mads is not bonded. Sigrid has a diploma. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 94. Sigrid is not recommended. Mads has an aptitude quotient of 97. Sigrid is not sponsored.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it is headhunted. No. 2 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it is not headhunted. No. 3 While the given candidate has an aptitude quotient not above 18, so it is probationary. No. 4 While the given candidate has a diploma, so it is onboarded. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given candidate is bonded. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is recommended. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is not bonded. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a diploma. Question: Is the claim \"Sigrid is headhunted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017255", "pair_id": "u017255-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017255-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1e8aa1054aeb3818", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017287-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has no interpreter. Florin is vaccinated. Florin is not contagious. Florin is bedridden. Cosima has no chaperone. Cosima is not allergic. Cosima has an interpreter. Florin is not allergic. Florin is hypertensive. Florin is discharged. Cosima is not hypertensive. Florin is waitlisted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is contagious while has an interpreter, thus it is not postoperative. Provision 2: when the patient here is discharged while is vaccinated, thus it is diabetic. Provision 3: when the patient here has a caregiver while is vaccinated while is not waitlisted, thus it is not ambulatory. Provision 4: when the patient here is discharged while is hypertensive, thus it has a caregiver. Provision 5: when the patient here has a caregiver while is bedridden while is hypertensive, thus it is referred. Provision 6: when the patient here has a caregiver while is allergic, thus it is ambulatory. Provision 5 has no effect when the patient here is anemic. Provision 4 has no effect when the patient here is allergic while has a chaperone. Provision 2 has no effect when the patient here is allergic. Question: Would it be right to say that Florin is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017287", "pair_id": "u017287-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017287-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c09b37e149cfe6b1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017287-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has no interpreter. Florin is vaccinated. Florin is not contagious. Florin is bedridden. Cosima has no chaperone. Cosima is not allergic. Cosima has an interpreter. Florin is not allergic. Florin is hypertensive. Florin is discharged. Cosima is not hypertensive. Florin is waitlisted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is contagious while has an interpreter, thus it is not postoperative. Provision 2: when the patient here is discharged while is vaccinated, thus it is diabetic. Provision 3: when the patient here has a caregiver while is vaccinated while is waitlisted, thus it is not ambulatory. Provision 4: when the patient here is discharged while is hypertensive, thus it has a caregiver. Provision 5: when the patient here has a caregiver while is bedridden while is hypertensive, thus it is referred. Provision 6: when the patient here has a caregiver while is allergic, thus it is ambulatory. Provision 5 has no effect when the patient here is anemic. Provision 4 has no effect when the patient here is allergic while has a chaperone. Provision 2 has no effect when the patient here is allergic. Question: Would it be right to say that Florin is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017287", "pair_id": "u017287-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017287-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "729a17653618699e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017293-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Teodor is bonded. Teodor is onboarded. Teodor is not bilingual. Teodor has no mentor. Teodor is unionized. Teodor has a visa. Teodor has a signing bonus.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate has no signing bonus, that candidate is interviewed. Item B. When the candidate is unionized, that candidate is not eligible. Item C. When the candidate is probationary, that candidate has a diploma. Item D. When the candidate is licensed, that candidate has no diploma. Item E. When the candidate has a mentor, that candidate is licensed. Item F. When the candidate has no diploma, that candidate is seasoned. Item G. When the candidate has no visa, that candidate is not licensed. Item H. When the candidate is not onboarded, that candidate is probationary. Item I. When the candidate has a signing bonus, that candidate is recommended. Item J. When the candidate is not licensed, that candidate is eligible. Item K. When the candidate has no diploma, that candidate is not seasoned. Item K is suspended when the candidate is not unionized. Item F is suspended when the candidate is unionized. Item J is suspended when the candidate is not bilingual. Item C is suspended when the candidate is bonded. Item G outranks Item E. Item B outranks Item J. Item C outranks Item D. Item K outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Teodor is seasoned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017293", "pair_id": "u017293-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017293-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "dc1c6b697d179368", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u017293-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Teodor is bonded. Teodor is onboarded. Teodor is not bilingual. Teodor has no mentor. Teodor is unionized. Teodor has a visa. Teodor has a signing bonus.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate has no signing bonus, that candidate is interviewed. Item B. When the candidate is unionized, that candidate is not eligible. Item C. When the candidate is probationary, that candidate has a diploma. Item D. When the candidate is licensed, that candidate has no diploma. Item E. When the candidate has a mentor, that candidate is licensed. Item F. When the candidate has no diploma, that candidate is seasoned. Item G. When the candidate has no visa, that candidate is not licensed. Item H. When the candidate is onboarded, that candidate is probationary. Item I. When the candidate has a signing bonus, that candidate is recommended. Item J. When the candidate is not licensed, that candidate is eligible. Item K. When the candidate has no diploma, that candidate is not seasoned. Item K is suspended when the candidate is not unionized. Item F is suspended when the candidate is unionized. Item J is suspended when the candidate is not bilingual. Item C is suspended when the candidate is bonded. Item G outranks Item E. Item B outranks Item J. Item C outranks Item D. Item K outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Teodor is seasoned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017293", "pair_id": "u017293-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017293-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bfeb800f3c048ddb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u017313-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is indemnified. Xaver has no rider. Dmitri has roadside assistance. Wanda has no dashcam. Wanda has no rider. Dmitri is not bundled. Wanda is covered. Dmitri is not litigated. Dmitri has a rider. Zdenek has roadside assistance. Dmitri is not covered. Xaver has no roadside assistance. Zdenek is not covered. Xaver is indemnified. Xaver is litigated. Xaver has a dashcam. Zdenek is bundled. Zdenek is not litigated. Xaver is bundled. Xaver is not covered. Zdenek has a rider.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has flood coverage while has no rider, thus it is disputed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is appraised, thus it has flood coverage. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is appraised while has a dashcam, thus it is reinstated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is covered, thus it is not appraised. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has flood coverage while has no rider while is litigated, thus it is not disputed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has flood coverage while is not indemnified, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is indemnified while is bundled, thus it is appraised. Provision 8: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is subrogated. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is litigated, thus it is not subrogated. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Would it be right to say that Xaver is disputed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017313", "pair_id": "u017313-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017313-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4796349c3160bd46", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u017313-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is indemnified. Xaver has no rider. Dmitri has roadside assistance. Wanda has no dashcam. Wanda has no rider. Dmitri is not bundled. Wanda is covered. Dmitri is not litigated. Dmitri has a rider. Zdenek has roadside assistance. Dmitri is not covered. Xaver has no roadside assistance. Zdenek is not covered. Xaver is indemnified. Xaver is litigated. Xaver has a dashcam. Zdenek is bundled. Zdenek is not litigated. Xaver is bundled. Xaver is not covered. Zdenek has a rider.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has flood coverage while has a rider, thus it is disputed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is appraised, thus it has flood coverage. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is appraised while has a dashcam, thus it is reinstated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is covered, thus it is not appraised. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has flood coverage while has no rider while is litigated, thus it is not disputed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has flood coverage while is not indemnified, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is indemnified while is bundled, thus it is appraised. Provision 8: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is subrogated. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is litigated, thus it is not subrogated. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Would it be right to say that Xaver is disputed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017313", "pair_id": "u017313-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017313-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3ccafe45f0c14d92", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u017313-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is indemnified. Xaver has no rider. Dmitri has roadside assistance. Wanda has no dashcam. Wanda has no rider. Dmitri is not bundled. Wanda is covered. Dmitri is not litigated. Dmitri has a rider. Zdenek has roadside assistance. Dmitri is not covered. Xaver has no roadside assistance. Zdenek is not covered. Xaver is indemnified. Xaver is litigated. Xaver has a dashcam. Zdenek is bundled. Zdenek is not litigated. Xaver is bundled. Xaver is not covered. Zdenek has a rider.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has flood coverage and further has no rider, it thereby is disputed. Point B. If said policyholder is appraised, it thereby has flood coverage. Point C. If said policyholder is appraised and further has a dashcam, it thereby is reinstated. Point D. If said policyholder is covered, it thereby is not appraised. Point E. If said policyholder has flood coverage and further has no rider and further is litigated, it thereby is not disputed. Point F. If said policyholder has flood coverage and further is not indemnified, it thereby is not reimbursed. Point G. If said policyholder is indemnified and further is bundled, it thereby is appraised. Point H. If said policyholder has roadside assistance, it thereby is subrogated. Point I. If said policyholder is litigated, it thereby is not subrogated. Point G supersedes Point D. Point H supersedes Point I. Point A supersedes Point E. Question: Statement: Xaver is disputed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017313", "pair_id": "u017313-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017313-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4796349c3160bd46", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u017313-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek is indemnified. Xaver has no rider. Dmitri has roadside assistance. Wanda has no dashcam. Wanda has no rider. Dmitri is not bundled. Wanda is covered. Dmitri is not litigated. Dmitri has a rider. Zdenek has roadside assistance. Dmitri is not covered. Xaver has no roadside assistance. Zdenek is not covered. Xaver is indemnified. Xaver is litigated. Xaver has a dashcam. Zdenek is bundled. Zdenek is not litigated. Xaver is bundled. Xaver is not covered. Zdenek has a rider.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has flood coverage and further has a rider, it thereby is disputed. Point B. If said policyholder is appraised, it thereby has flood coverage. Point C. If said policyholder is appraised and further has a dashcam, it thereby is reinstated. Point D. If said policyholder is covered, it thereby is not appraised. Point E. If said policyholder has flood coverage and further has no rider and further is litigated, it thereby is not disputed. Point F. If said policyholder has flood coverage and further is not indemnified, it thereby is not reimbursed. Point G. If said policyholder is indemnified and further is bundled, it thereby is appraised. Point H. If said policyholder has roadside assistance, it thereby is subrogated. Point I. If said policyholder is litigated, it thereby is not subrogated. Point G supersedes Point D. Point H supersedes Point I. Point A supersedes Point E. Question: Statement: Xaver is disputed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017313", "pair_id": "u017313-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017313-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3ccafe45f0c14d92", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u017335-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has no deductible waiver. Celeste is subrogated. Celeste is appraised. Celeste is covered.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is not subrogated, then it has no dashcam. (2) If a policyholder is covered, then it is reinstated. (3) If a policyholder has roadside assistance, then it has flood coverage. (4) If a policyholder is reinstated, then it has roadside assistance. (5) If a policyholder has a premium discount, then it has a rider. (6) If a policyholder has a deductible waiver, then it is not litigated. (7) If a policyholder is lapsed, then it is reimbursed. (8) If a policyholder is covered, then it has a beneficiary. (9) If a policyholder is grandfathered, then it is lapsed. (10) If a policyholder is not litigated, then it has a premium discount. (11) If a policyholder is not covered, then it is grandfathered. (12) If a policyholder is not appraised, then it has an adjuster. Question: Which option holds for Celeste?", "options": ["is reimbursed", "has flood coverage", "has a rider"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has flood coverage", "unit_id": "u017335", "pair_id": "u017335-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017335-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "02d48b44076f5e0e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a10", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017335-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has no deductible waiver. Celeste is subrogated. Celeste is appraised. Celeste is not covered.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is not subrogated, then it has no dashcam. (2) If a policyholder is covered, then it is reinstated. (3) If a policyholder has roadside assistance, then it has flood coverage. (4) If a policyholder is reinstated, then it has roadside assistance. (5) If a policyholder has a premium discount, then it has a rider. (6) If a policyholder has a deductible waiver, then it is not litigated. (7) If a policyholder is lapsed, then it is reimbursed. (8) If a policyholder is covered, then it has a beneficiary. (9) If a policyholder is grandfathered, then it is lapsed. (10) If a policyholder is not litigated, then it has a premium discount. (11) If a policyholder is not covered, then it is grandfathered. (12) If a policyholder is not appraised, then it has an adjuster. Question: Which option holds for Celeste?", "options": ["is reimbursed", "has flood coverage", "has a rider"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u017335", "pair_id": "u017335-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017335-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "e78d814ff3167233", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a10", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017335-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has no deductible waiver. Celeste is subrogated. Celeste is appraised. Celeste is covered.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is not subrogated, it also has no dashcam. Clause 2: once any policyholder is covered, it also is reinstated. Clause 3: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also has flood coverage. Clause 4: once any policyholder is reinstated, it also has roadside assistance. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also has a rider. Clause 6: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also is not litigated. Clause 7: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is reimbursed. Clause 8: once any policyholder is covered, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 9: once any policyholder is grandfathered, it also is lapsed. Clause 10: once any policyholder is not litigated, it also has a premium discount. Clause 11: once any policyholder is not covered, it also is grandfathered. Clause 12: once any policyholder is not appraised, it also has an adjuster. Question: Which of these is true of Celeste?", "options": ["is reimbursed", "has flood coverage", "has a rider"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has flood coverage", "unit_id": "u017335", "pair_id": "u017335-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017335-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "02d48b44076f5e0e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a10", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017335-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has no deductible waiver. Celeste is subrogated. Celeste is appraised. Celeste is not covered.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is not subrogated, it also has no dashcam. Clause 2: once any policyholder is covered, it also is reinstated. Clause 3: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also has flood coverage. Clause 4: once any policyholder is reinstated, it also has roadside assistance. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also has a rider. Clause 6: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also is not litigated. Clause 7: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is reimbursed. Clause 8: once any policyholder is covered, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 9: once any policyholder is grandfathered, it also is lapsed. Clause 10: once any policyholder is not litigated, it also has a premium discount. Clause 11: once any policyholder is not covered, it also is grandfathered. Clause 12: once any policyholder is not appraised, it also has an adjuster. Question: Which of these is true of Celeste?", "options": ["is reimbursed", "has flood coverage", "has a rider"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u017335", "pair_id": "u017335-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017335-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "e78d814ff3167233", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a10", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017351-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is reinstated. Agata has no beneficiary. Yara has a beneficiary. Yara is not grandfathered. Agata is not grandfathered.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is reinstated, then it is inspected. (2) If a policyholder is not disputed, then it has no flood coverage. (3) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it is disputed. (4) If a policyholder is grandfathered, then it is covered. (5) If a policyholder is inspected, then it has flood coverage. Question: Is it true that Yara has no flood coverage?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017351", "pair_id": "u017351-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017351-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "84fa43fec693ef83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017351-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is reinstated. Agata has no beneficiary. Yara has a beneficiary. Yara is not grandfathered. Agata is not grandfathered.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is reinstated, then it is inspected. (2) If a policyholder is disputed, then it has no flood coverage. (3) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it is disputed. (4) If a policyholder is grandfathered, then it is covered. (5) If a policyholder is inspected, then it has flood coverage. Question: Is it true that Yara has no flood coverage?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017351", "pair_id": "u017351-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017351-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "188692b9393a785b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017381-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dagny has a credit rating of 10. Dagny has a guarantor. Dagny is not vetted. Dagny is not audited. Dagny has a risk tier of 92. Dagny is a depositor. Dagny is delinquent.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is bankrupt and additionally is not delinquent, it then has a lien. #2 Each time a borrower has a guarantor and additionally is not audited and additionally has a credit rating of 28 or below, it then has an escrow account. #3 Each time a borrower has an escrow account and additionally is a depositor, it then is bankrupt. #4 Each time a borrower is bankrupt and additionally is delinquent, it then is pensioned. #5 Each time a borrower is not vetted and additionally has a credit rating less than 81, it then is prequalified. #6 Each time a borrower is bankrupt and additionally is garnished and additionally is not underwritten, it then is creditworthy. #5 is set aside if a borrower is underwritten. #6 is set aside if a borrower has a risk tier of 81 or above. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Dagny?", "options": ["has a lien", "is pensioned", "is creditworthy"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is pensioned", "unit_id": "u017381", "pair_id": "u017381-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017381-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "52cd0e35a9703369", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a11", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017381-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dagny has a credit rating of 10. Dagny has a guarantor. Dagny is vetted. Dagny is not audited. Dagny has a risk tier of 92. Dagny is a depositor. Dagny is delinquent.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is bankrupt and additionally is not delinquent, it then has a lien. #2 Each time a borrower has a guarantor and additionally is not audited and additionally has a credit rating of 28 or below, it then has an escrow account. #3 Each time a borrower has an escrow account and additionally is a depositor, it then is bankrupt. #4 Each time a borrower is bankrupt and additionally is delinquent, it then is pensioned. #5 Each time a borrower is not vetted and additionally has a credit rating less than 81, it then is prequalified. #6 Each time a borrower is bankrupt and additionally is garnished and additionally is not underwritten, it then is creditworthy. #5 is set aside if a borrower is underwritten. #6 is set aside if a borrower has a risk tier of 81 or above. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Dagny?", "options": ["has a lien", "is pensioned", "is creditworthy"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is pensioned", "unit_id": "u017381", "pair_id": "u017381-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017381-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ca0a8034bc2ac4f0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a11", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017388-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid has a repayment grade of 28. Tomas is not pensioned. Evren is not a depositor. Tomas is a depositor. Corin is not pensioned. Ingrid is a depositor. Corin has a repayment grade of 8. Corin has no escrow account.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is bankrupt provided that it has an escrow account. Section 2: a borrower has a lien provided that it is indebted. Section 3: a borrower is employed provided that it is bankrupt. Section 4: a borrower is indebted provided that it is not a depositor. Section 5: a borrower has no cosigner provided that it is employed. Section 6: a borrower is not foreclosed provided that it is pensioned. Section 7: a borrower is delinquent provided that it has a repayment grade of 37 or higher. Section 8: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it has a lien. Question: Ingrid has a cosigner. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017388", "pair_id": "u017388-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017388-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "71c2bfc60b432dff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017388-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid has a repayment grade of 28. Tomas is not pensioned. Evren is not a depositor. Tomas is a depositor. Corin is not pensioned. Ingrid is a depositor. Corin has a repayment grade of 8. Corin has no escrow account.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is bankrupt provided that it has an escrow account. Section 2: a borrower has a lien provided that it is indebted. Section 3: a borrower is employed provided that it is bankrupt. Section 4: a borrower is indebted provided that it is a depositor. Section 5: a borrower has no cosigner provided that it is employed. Section 6: a borrower is not foreclosed provided that it is pensioned. Section 7: a borrower is delinquent provided that it has a repayment grade of 37 or higher. Section 8: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it has a lien. Question: Ingrid has a cosigner. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017388", "pair_id": "u017388-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017388-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "401b35d1fb2c2454", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017388-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid has a repayment grade of 28. Tomas is not pensioned. Evren is not a depositor. Tomas is a depositor. Corin is not pensioned. Ingrid is a depositor. Corin has a repayment grade of 8. Corin has no escrow account.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is bankrupt. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is indebted: then it has a lien. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt: then it is employed. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is not a depositor: then it is indebted. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is employed: then it has no cosigner. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is pensioned: then it is not foreclosed. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has a repayment grade no lower than 37: then it is delinquent. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower has a lien: then it has a cosigner. Question: Is it so that Ingrid has a cosigner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017388", "pair_id": "u017388-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017388-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "71c2bfc60b432dff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017388-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid has a repayment grade of 28. Tomas is not pensioned. Evren is not a depositor. Tomas is a depositor. Corin is not pensioned. Ingrid is a depositor. Corin has a repayment grade of 8. Corin has no escrow account.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is bankrupt. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is indebted: then it has a lien. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt: then it is employed. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is a depositor: then it is indebted. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is employed: then it has no cosigner. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is pensioned: then it is not foreclosed. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has a repayment grade no lower than 37: then it is delinquent. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower has a lien: then it has a cosigner. Question: Is it so that Ingrid has a cosigner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017388", "pair_id": "u017388-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017388-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "401b35d1fb2c2454", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017403-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rune has a portfolio. Rune is certified. Rune is headhunted. Rune has a mentor. Rune is freelance. Rune is not a veteran. Rune is not relocating.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a mentor: then it is seasoned. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is not licensed: then it is not onboarded. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a portfolio plus is not a veteran: then it has a visa. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is seasoned plus has no signing bonus plus is not fingerprinted: then it is probationary. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is seasoned plus is headhunted plus is relocating: then it has a background screening. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is seasoned plus is certified plus is bonded: then it is a graduate. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate is not a veteran: then it is sponsored. Policy VIII. Suppose that candidate is freelance: then it is bonded. Policy IX. Suppose that candidate is seasoned plus is not headhunted: then it is licensed. Policy X. Suppose that candidate is seasoned plus has a signing bonus: then it is recommended. Policy XI. Suppose that candidate is seasoned plus is not certified plus is not relocating: then it is interviewed. Question: Which choice is right for Rune?", "options": ["has a background screening", "is recommended", "is interviewed", "is a graduate", "is probationary", "is licensed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is a graduate", "unit_id": "u017403", "pair_id": "u017403-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017403-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "f8d7c50fc0ce71d5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a15", "a17", "a9", "a16", "a3"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017403-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rune has no portfolio. Rune is certified. Rune is headhunted. Rune has a mentor. Rune is freelance. Rune is not a veteran. Rune is not relocating.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a mentor: then it is seasoned. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is not licensed: then it is not onboarded. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a portfolio plus is not a veteran: then it has a visa. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is seasoned plus has no signing bonus plus is not fingerprinted: then it is probationary. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is seasoned plus is headhunted plus is relocating: then it has a background screening. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is seasoned plus is certified plus is bonded: then it is a graduate. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate is not a veteran: then it is sponsored. Policy VIII. Suppose that candidate is freelance: then it is bonded. Policy IX. Suppose that candidate is seasoned plus is not headhunted: then it is licensed. Policy X. Suppose that candidate is seasoned plus has a signing bonus: then it is recommended. Policy XI. Suppose that candidate is seasoned plus is not certified plus is not relocating: then it is interviewed. Question: Which choice is right for Rune?", "options": ["has a background screening", "is recommended", "is interviewed", "is a graduate", "is probationary", "is licensed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is a graduate", "unit_id": "u017403", "pair_id": "u017403-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017403-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "c780225ba960c448", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a15", "a17", "a9", "a16", "a3"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017403-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rune has a portfolio. Rune is certified. Rune is headhunted. Rune has a mentor. Rune is freelance. Rune is not a veteran. Rune is not relocating.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has a mentor, it then is seasoned. #2 Each time a candidate is not licensed, it then is not onboarded. #3 Each time a candidate has a portfolio and additionally is not a veteran, it then has a visa. #4 Each time a candidate is seasoned and additionally has no signing bonus and additionally is not fingerprinted, it then is probationary. #5 Each time a candidate is seasoned and additionally is headhunted and additionally is relocating, it then has a background screening. #6 Each time a candidate is seasoned and additionally is certified and additionally is bonded, it then is a graduate. #7 Each time a candidate is not a veteran, it then is sponsored. #8 Each time a candidate is freelance, it then is bonded. #9 Each time a candidate is seasoned and additionally is not headhunted, it then is licensed. #10 Each time a candidate is seasoned and additionally has a signing bonus, it then is recommended. #11 Each time a candidate is seasoned and additionally is not certified and additionally is not relocating, it then is interviewed. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Rune?", "options": ["has a background screening", "is recommended", "is interviewed", "is a graduate", "is probationary", "is licensed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is a graduate", "unit_id": "u017403", "pair_id": "u017403-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017403-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "f8d7c50fc0ce71d5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a15", "a17", "a9", "a16", "a3"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017403-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rune has no portfolio. Rune is certified. Rune is headhunted. Rune has a mentor. Rune is freelance. Rune is not a veteran. Rune is not relocating.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has a mentor, it then is seasoned. #2 Each time a candidate is not licensed, it then is not onboarded. #3 Each time a candidate has a portfolio and additionally is not a veteran, it then has a visa. #4 Each time a candidate is seasoned and additionally has no signing bonus and additionally is not fingerprinted, it then is probationary. #5 Each time a candidate is seasoned and additionally is headhunted and additionally is relocating, it then has a background screening. #6 Each time a candidate is seasoned and additionally is certified and additionally is bonded, it then is a graduate. #7 Each time a candidate is not a veteran, it then is sponsored. #8 Each time a candidate is freelance, it then is bonded. #9 Each time a candidate is seasoned and additionally is not headhunted, it then is licensed. #10 Each time a candidate is seasoned and additionally has a signing bonus, it then is recommended. #11 Each time a candidate is seasoned and additionally is not certified and additionally is not relocating, it then is interviewed. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Rune?", "options": ["has a background screening", "is recommended", "is interviewed", "is a graduate", "is probationary", "is licensed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is a graduate", "unit_id": "u017403", "pair_id": "u017403-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017403-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "c780225ba960c448", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a15", "a17", "a9", "a16", "a3"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017413-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not replicated. Zephyr is encrypted. Sierra is deprecated. Zephyr is not replicated. Sierra is encrypted. Zephyr has a firewall. Sierra has a firewall. Sierra has no snapshot. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra is patched. Sierra has a public endpoint. Sierra is backed up. Sierra is virtualized. Zephyr is backed up. Sierra is provisioned.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is throttled provided that it is patched as well as has a firewall. Section 2: a workload is cached provided that it has a public endpoint as well as is virtualized as well as is idle. Section 3: a workload is not sandboxed provided that it is mirrored as well as is provisioned as well as has a failover node. Section 4: a workload is stateless provided that it is provisioned as well as has a firewall as well as is deprecated. Section 5: a workload is mirrored provided that it is throttled as well as has a firewall. Section 6: a workload is sandboxed provided that it is mirrored as well as has a public endpoint as well as has a snapshot. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it is replicated. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it is backed up. Question: Sierra is sandboxed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017413", "pair_id": "u017413-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017413-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "866e1b82743e2bca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017413-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not replicated. Zephyr is encrypted. Sierra is deprecated. Zephyr is not replicated. Sierra is encrypted. Zephyr has a firewall. Sierra has a firewall. Sierra has no snapshot. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra is patched. Sierra has a public endpoint. Sierra is backed up. Sierra is virtualized. Zephyr is backed up. Sierra is provisioned.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is throttled provided that it is patched as well as has a firewall. Section 2: a workload is cached provided that it has a public endpoint as well as is virtualized as well as is idle. Section 3: a workload is not autoscaled provided that it is backed up as well as is deprecated as well as is encrypted. Section 4: a workload is not sandboxed provided that it is mirrored as well as is provisioned as well as has a failover node. Section 5: a workload is stateless provided that it is provisioned as well as has a firewall as well as is deprecated. Section 6: a workload is mirrored provided that it is throttled as well as has a firewall. Section 7: a workload is sandboxed provided that it is mirrored as well as has a public endpoint as well as has a snapshot. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it is replicated. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it is backed up. Question: Sierra is sandboxed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017413", "pair_id": "u017413-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017413-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1dce1cf9a2091804", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017413-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not replicated. Zephyr is encrypted. Sierra is deprecated. Zephyr is not replicated. Sierra is encrypted. Zephyr has a firewall. Sierra has a firewall. Sierra has no snapshot. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra is patched. Sierra has a public endpoint. Sierra is backed up. Sierra is virtualized. Zephyr is backed up. Sierra is provisioned.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is patched and additionally has a firewall, it then is throttled. #2 Each time a workload has a public endpoint and additionally is virtualized and additionally is idle, it then is cached. #3 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally is provisioned and additionally has a failover node, it then is not sandboxed. #4 Each time a workload is provisioned and additionally has a firewall and additionally is deprecated, it then is stateless. #5 Each time a workload is throttled and additionally has a firewall, it then is mirrored. #6 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally has a public endpoint and additionally has a snapshot, it then is sandboxed. #1 is set aside if a workload is replicated. #2 is set aside if a workload is backed up. Question: Do the terms above show that Sierra is sandboxed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017413", "pair_id": "u017413-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017413-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "866e1b82743e2bca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017413-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not replicated. Zephyr is encrypted. Sierra is deprecated. Zephyr is not replicated. Sierra is encrypted. Zephyr has a firewall. Sierra has a firewall. Sierra has no snapshot. Sierra has a failover node. Sierra is patched. Sierra has a public endpoint. Sierra is backed up. Sierra is virtualized. Zephyr is backed up. Sierra is provisioned.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is patched and additionally has a firewall, it then is throttled. #2 Each time a workload has a public endpoint and additionally is virtualized and additionally is idle, it then is cached. #3 Each time a workload is backed up and additionally is deprecated and additionally is encrypted, it then is not autoscaled. #4 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally is provisioned and additionally has a failover node, it then is not sandboxed. #5 Each time a workload is provisioned and additionally has a firewall and additionally is deprecated, it then is stateless. #6 Each time a workload is throttled and additionally has a firewall, it then is mirrored. #7 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally has a public endpoint and additionally has a snapshot, it then is sandboxed. #1 is set aside if a workload is replicated. #2 is set aside if a workload is backed up. Question: Do the terms above show that Sierra is sandboxed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017413", "pair_id": "u017413-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017413-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1dce1cf9a2091804", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017421-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is not pregnant. Elif is asthmatic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is pregnant and further is asthmatic, it thereby is sedated. Point B. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby is not allergic. Point A is cancelled if said patient is pregnant. Question: Statement: Elif is diabetic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017421", "pair_id": "u017421-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017421-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "99a7c77956b5b255", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017421-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is not pregnant. Elif is diabetic. Elif is asthmatic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is pregnant and further is asthmatic, it thereby is sedated. Point B. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby is not allergic. Point A is cancelled if said patient is pregnant. Question: Statement: Elif is diabetic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017421", "pair_id": "u017421-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017421-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "153b540db2034efe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017427-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra has a milestone total of 82. Electra is resubmitted. Aldebaran has a milestone total of 37. Izar is resubmitted. Electra is not theoretical. Izar is theoretical. Hadar has a milestone total of 71.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is shortlisted provided that it is collaborative. Section 2: a proposal has seed funding provided that it is shortlisted. Section 3: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it is theoretical. Section 4: a proposal has no industry backing provided that it is a pilot study. Section 5: a proposal is collaborative provided that it has a milestone total of 71 or lower. Section 6: a proposal is cofunded provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 71. Section 7: a proposal is budgeted provided that it has ethics clearance. Section 8: a proposal has industry backing provided that it is budgeted. Section 9: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it is cofunded. Section 10: a proposal is not longitudinal provided that it is resubmitted. Section 11: a proposal has a patent filing provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Which statement fits Electra?", "options": ["has a patent filing", "has industry backing", "has seed funding"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a patent filing", "unit_id": "u017427", "pair_id": "u017427-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017427-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2b9b1c9a84cb6a15", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a1", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017427-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra has a milestone total of 82. Electra is resubmitted. Aldebaran has a milestone total of 37. Izar is resubmitted. Electra is not theoretical. Izar is theoretical. Hadar has a milestone total of 8.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is shortlisted provided that it is collaborative. Section 2: a proposal has seed funding provided that it is shortlisted. Section 3: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it is theoretical. Section 4: a proposal has no industry backing provided that it is a pilot study. Section 5: a proposal is collaborative provided that it has a milestone total of 71 or lower. Section 6: a proposal is cofunded provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 71. Section 7: a proposal is budgeted provided that it has ethics clearance. Section 8: a proposal has industry backing provided that it is budgeted. Section 9: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it is cofunded. Section 10: a proposal is not longitudinal provided that it is resubmitted. Section 11: a proposal has a patent filing provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Which statement fits Electra?", "options": ["has a patent filing", "has industry backing", "has seed funding"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a patent filing", "unit_id": "u017427", "pair_id": "u017427-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017427-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fa251f4d50abd025", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a1", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017427-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra has a milestone total of 82. Electra is resubmitted. Aldebaran has a milestone total of 37. Izar is resubmitted. Electra is not theoretical. Izar is theoretical. Hadar has a milestone total of 71.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then is shortlisted. #2 Each time a proposal is shortlisted, it then has seed funding. #3 Each time a proposal is theoretical, it then has ethics clearance. #4 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then has no industry backing. #5 Each time a proposal has a milestone total of 71 or below, it then is collaborative. #6 Each time a proposal has a milestone total greater than 71, it then is cofunded. #7 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance, it then is budgeted. #8 Each time a proposal is budgeted, it then has industry backing. #9 Each time a proposal is cofunded, it then is peer reviewed. #10 Each time a proposal is resubmitted, it then is not longitudinal. #11 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then has a patent filing. #4 yields to #8. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Electra?", "options": ["has a patent filing", "has industry backing", "has seed funding"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a patent filing", "unit_id": "u017427", "pair_id": "u017427-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017427-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2b9b1c9a84cb6a15", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a1", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017427-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra has a milestone total of 82. Electra is resubmitted. Aldebaran has a milestone total of 37. Izar is resubmitted. Electra is not theoretical. Izar is theoretical. Hadar has a milestone total of 8.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then is shortlisted. #2 Each time a proposal is shortlisted, it then has seed funding. #3 Each time a proposal is theoretical, it then has ethics clearance. #4 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then has no industry backing. #5 Each time a proposal has a milestone total of 71 or below, it then is collaborative. #6 Each time a proposal has a milestone total greater than 71, it then is cofunded. #7 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance, it then is budgeted. #8 Each time a proposal is budgeted, it then has industry backing. #9 Each time a proposal is cofunded, it then is peer reviewed. #10 Each time a proposal is resubmitted, it then is not longitudinal. #11 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then has a patent filing. #4 yields to #8. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Electra?", "options": ["has a patent filing", "has industry backing", "has seed funding"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a patent filing", "unit_id": "u017427", "pair_id": "u017427-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017427-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fa251f4d50abd025", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a1", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017444-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is pregnant. Gunnar has no chaperone. Aurel is not sedated. Aurel is not pregnant. Gunnar is not pregnant. Dorian is not sedated. Aurel has a chaperone. Dorian is referred.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is bedridden, then it has an interpreter. (2) If a patient is pregnant, then it is bedridden. (3) If a patient has an interpreter, then it is anemic. (4) If a patient has an interpreter, then it is not anemic. (5) If a patient has no chaperone, then it has a pacemaker. (3) is void if the patient is not referred. (2) is void if the patient is sedated. (4) is void if the patient is referred. (5) is void if the patient is not pregnant. Question: Is it true that Dorian is not anemic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017444", "pair_id": "u017444-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017444-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ce17209af3b0147b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017444-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is pregnant. Gunnar has no chaperone. Aurel is not sedated. Aurel is not pregnant. Gunnar is not pregnant. Dorian is not sedated. Aurel has a chaperone. Dorian is not referred.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is bedridden, then it has an interpreter. (2) If a patient is pregnant, then it is bedridden. (3) If a patient has an interpreter, then it is anemic. (4) If a patient has an interpreter, then it is not anemic. (5) If a patient has no chaperone, then it has a pacemaker. (3) is void if the patient is not referred. (2) is void if the patient is sedated. (4) is void if the patient is referred. (5) is void if the patient is not pregnant. Question: Is it true that Dorian is not anemic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017444", "pair_id": "u017444-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017444-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "05569365f0af75fd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017444-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is pregnant. Gunnar has no chaperone. Aurel is not sedated. Aurel is not pregnant. Gunnar is not pregnant. Dorian is not sedated. Aurel has a chaperone. Dorian is referred.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is bedridden, that patient has an interpreter. Item B. When the patient is pregnant, that patient is bedridden. Item C. When the patient has an interpreter, that patient is anemic. Item D. When the patient has an interpreter, that patient is not anemic. Item E. When the patient has no chaperone, that patient has a pacemaker. Item C is suspended when the patient is not referred. Item B is suspended when the patient is sedated. Item D is suspended when the patient is referred. Item E is suspended when the patient is not pregnant. Question: Can one infer that Dorian is not anemic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017444", "pair_id": "u017444-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017444-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ce17209af3b0147b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017444-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is pregnant. Gunnar has no chaperone. Aurel is not sedated. Aurel is not pregnant. Gunnar is not pregnant. Dorian is not sedated. Aurel has a chaperone. Dorian is not referred.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is bedridden, that patient has an interpreter. Item B. When the patient is pregnant, that patient is bedridden. Item C. When the patient has an interpreter, that patient is anemic. Item D. When the patient has an interpreter, that patient is not anemic. Item E. When the patient has no chaperone, that patient has a pacemaker. Item C is suspended when the patient is not referred. Item B is suspended when the patient is sedated. Item D is suspended when the patient is referred. Item E is suspended when the patient is not pregnant. Question: Can one infer that Dorian is not anemic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017444", "pair_id": "u017444-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017444-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "05569365f0af75fd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017566-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is experimental. Feldspar is flaky. Quartz is not versioned. Obsidian is not flaky. Obsidian is not merged. Quartz is not merged. Obsidian is not compiled. Gneiss is versioned. Obsidian is not versioned. Gneiss is flaky. Quartz is not flaky.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is backported, thus it is documented. Provision 2: when the build here is localized, thus it is not signed. Provision 3: when the build here is profiled, thus it is backported. Provision 4: when the build here is backported, thus it is signed. Provision 5: when the build here is experimental, thus it is profiled. Provision 6: when the build here is merged, thus it is obsolete. Provision 7: when the build here has a changelog, thus it is tested. Provision 8: when the build here is localized, thus it has a changelog. Provision 9: when the build here is not versioned, thus it is localized. Provision 6 has no effect when the build here is flaky. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here is merged. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Obsidian?", "options": ["is tested", "is signed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is tested", "unit_id": "u017566", "pair_id": "u017566-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017566-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "90cb311f15034905", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a4"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u017566-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is experimental. Feldspar is flaky. Quartz is not versioned. Obsidian is not flaky. Obsidian is not merged. Quartz is not merged. Obsidian is not compiled. Gneiss is versioned. Obsidian is not versioned. Gneiss is flaky. Quartz is not flaky.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is backported, thus it is documented. Provision 2: when the build here is localized, thus it is not signed. Provision 3: when the build here is profiled, thus it is backported. Provision 4: when the build here is backported, thus it is signed. Provision 5: when the build here is experimental, thus it is profiled. Provision 6: when the build here is merged, thus it is obsolete. Provision 7: when the build here has a changelog, thus it is tested. Provision 8: when the build here is localized, thus it has a changelog. Provision 9: when the build here is versioned, thus it is localized. Provision 6 has no effect when the build here is flaky. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here is merged. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Obsidian?", "options": ["is tested", "is signed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is signed", "unit_id": "u017566", "pair_id": "u017566-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017566-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "39a43718490100f0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a4"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u017567-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a migration script. Schist is fuzzed. Zircon is fuzzed. Basalt is not fuzzed. Schist is not reverted. Zircon is not reverted.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is reverted, then it is not profiled. (2) If a build is fuzzed, then it is profiled. (3) If a build has a migration script, then it is versioned. Question: Is it true that Zircon is not profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017567", "pair_id": "u017567-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017567-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "1bba81f25b366d4a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017567-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a migration script. Schist is fuzzed. Zircon is fuzzed. Basalt is not fuzzed. Schist is not reverted. Zircon is not reverted.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is reverted, then it is not profiled. (2) If a build is fuzzed, then it is profiled. (3) If a build has no migration script, then it is versioned. Question: Is it true that Zircon is not profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017567", "pair_id": "u017567-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017567-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "61b1d51b52e1052e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017567-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a migration script. Schist is fuzzed. Zircon is fuzzed. Basalt is not fuzzed. Schist is not reverted. Zircon is not reverted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is reverted, it also is not profiled. Clause 2: once any build is fuzzed, it also is profiled. Clause 3: once any build has a migration script, it also is versioned. Question: Does it follow that Zircon is not profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017567", "pair_id": "u017567-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017567-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "1bba81f25b366d4a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017567-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a migration script. Schist is fuzzed. Zircon is fuzzed. Basalt is not fuzzed. Schist is not reverted. Zircon is not reverted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is reverted, it also is not profiled. Clause 2: once any build is fuzzed, it also is profiled. Clause 3: once any build has no migration script, it also is versioned. Question: Does it follow that Zircon is not profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017567", "pair_id": "u017567-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017567-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "61b1d51b52e1052e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017611-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut has no steering committee. Fomalhaut has no field site. Electra is a pilot study. Mirach is not shortlisted. Electra has no steering committee. Fomalhaut is not exploratory. Mirach is not preregistered. Mirach has no steering committee. Fomalhaut is not a pilot study. Gemma is not shortlisted. Electra is shortlisted.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a field site, then it is renewed. (2) If a proposal has a field site, then it is not renewed. (3) If a proposal is exploratory, then it is cofunded. (4) If a proposal is shortlisted, then it is not cofunded. (2) is void if the proposal has a steering committee. (2) is void if the proposal is a pilot study. (1) is void if the proposal is preregistered. When (3) and (4) clash, (3) prevails. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Electra is not renewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017611", "pair_id": "u017611-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017611-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a584abd4d0db4a6b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017611-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut has no steering committee. Fomalhaut has no field site. Electra is a pilot study. Mirach is not shortlisted. Electra has no steering committee. Fomalhaut is not exploratory. Mirach is not preregistered. Mirach has no steering committee. Electra has a field site. Fomalhaut is not a pilot study. Gemma is not shortlisted. Electra is shortlisted.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a field site, then it is renewed. (2) If a proposal has a field site, then it is not renewed. (3) If a proposal is exploratory, then it is cofunded. (4) If a proposal is shortlisted, then it is not cofunded. (2) is void if the proposal has a steering committee. (2) is void if the proposal is a pilot study. (1) is void if the proposal is preregistered. When (3) and (4) clash, (3) prevails. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Electra is not renewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017611", "pair_id": "u017611-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017611-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0e00df0ac8512400", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u017655-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is fasting. Florin has a pacemaker. Benedek has a pacemaker. Zora has a pulse rate of 79. Benedek is not allergic. Zora is not allergic. Zora has no pacemaker. Benedek is symptomatic. Benedek is fasting. Benedek has a fever reading of 98. Florin is not contagious. Florin has a fever reading of 86. Florin has a pulse rate of 55. Zora is symptomatic. Zora has a fever reading of 62.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has an interpreter and also has a fever reading of 62 or more, it also is anemic. Clause 2: once any patient has a pacemaker and also is not allergic and also is not symptomatic, it also has no interpreter. Clause 3: once any patient has a pacemaker and also is allergic and also has a pulse rate over 23, it also has an interpreter. Clause 4: once any patient is contagious, it also has a caregiver. Clause 3 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a fever reading over 25 and also is fasting. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not symptomatic. Question: Does it follow that Benedek has an interpreter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017655", "pair_id": "u017655-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017655-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2ff3a02634419eb5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017655-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is fasting. Florin has a pacemaker. Benedek has a pacemaker. Zora has a pulse rate of 79. Benedek is not allergic. Zora is not allergic. Zora has no pacemaker. Benedek is symptomatic. Benedek is fasting. Benedek has a fever reading of 98. Florin is not contagious. Florin has a fever reading of 86. Florin has a pulse rate of 55. Zora is symptomatic. Zora has a fever reading of 62.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has an interpreter and also has a fever reading of 62 or more, it also is anemic. Clause 2: once any patient has a pacemaker and also is not allergic and also is symptomatic, it also has no interpreter. Clause 3: once any patient has a pacemaker and also is allergic and also has a pulse rate over 23, it also has an interpreter. Clause 4: once any patient is contagious, it also has a caregiver. Clause 3 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a fever reading over 25 and also is fasting. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not symptomatic. Question: Does it follow that Benedek has an interpreter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017655", "pair_id": "u017655-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017655-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c6570f1735877361", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017666-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist is backported. Obsidian has a migration script. Obsidian is backported. Schist has a migration script. Shale is not backported. Shale has no migration script.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is not backported, it thereby is tagged. Point B. If said build has no migration script, it thereby is profiled. Point C. If said build has a migration script, it thereby is tested. Point A is cancelled if said build is backported. Question: Which choice is true for Shale?", "options": ["is tested", "is profiled"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is profiled", "unit_id": "u017666", "pair_id": "u017666-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017666-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "768296eeac064152", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a0", "a2"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017666-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist is backported. Obsidian has a migration script. Obsidian is backported. Schist has a migration script. Shale is backported. Shale has no migration script.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is not backported, it thereby is tagged. Point B. If said build has no migration script, it thereby is profiled. Point C. If said build has a migration script, it thereby is tested. Point A is cancelled if said build is backported. Question: Which choice is true for Shale?", "options": ["is tested", "is profiled"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is profiled", "unit_id": "u017666", "pair_id": "u017666-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017666-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2c012ae56eee0141", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a0", "a2"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u017676-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna is not interviewed. Rune is bonded. Rune is not interviewed. Kalle has no visa. Kalle is fingerprinted. Kalle is bonded. Jasna has a visa. Jasna is not bonded.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a signing bonus and further is not interviewed and further has a visa, it thereby is onboarded. Point B. If said candidate has a signing bonus and further is bonded, it thereby is not onboarded. Point C. If said candidate is fingerprinted and further is bonded, it thereby has a diploma. Point D. If said candidate has a visa, it thereby has a signing bonus. Point E. If said candidate is fingerprinted, it thereby is unionized. Question: Statement: Jasna is onboarded. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017676", "pair_id": "u017676-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017676-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "b95155a537107668", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017676-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna is not interviewed. Rune is bonded. Rune is not interviewed. Kalle has no visa. Kalle is fingerprinted. Kalle is bonded. Jasna has a visa. Jasna is not bonded.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a signing bonus and further is interviewed and further has a visa, it thereby is onboarded. Point B. If said candidate has a signing bonus and further is bonded, it thereby is not onboarded. Point C. If said candidate is fingerprinted and further is bonded, it thereby has a diploma. Point D. If said candidate has a visa, it thereby has a signing bonus. Point E. If said candidate is fingerprinted, it thereby is unionized. Question: Statement: Jasna is onboarded. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017676", "pair_id": "u017676-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017676-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "572749c7bed1c51d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017685-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has a peril factor of 49. Yara has no beneficiary. Yara has no deductible waiver.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a premium discount, thus it has an adjuster. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has an adjuster, thus it has a rider. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is inspected, thus it is retired. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is inspected. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has no beneficiary, thus it is not a claimant. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it has no rider. Question: Would it be right to say that Yara has a rider?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017685", "pair_id": "u017685-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017685-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "5ca007107f6ff89a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017685-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has a peril factor of 49. Yara has no beneficiary. Yara has no deductible waiver.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a premium discount, thus it has an adjuster. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has an adjuster, thus it has a rider. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a peril factor beneath 71, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is inspected, thus it is retired. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is inspected. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has no beneficiary, thus it is not a claimant. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it has no rider. Question: Would it be right to say that Yara has a rider?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017685", "pair_id": "u017685-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017685-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "869eb367b0b3c403", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017685-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has a peril factor of 49. Yara has no beneficiary. Yara has no deductible waiver.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby has an adjuster. Point B. If said policyholder has an adjuster, it thereby has a rider. Point C. If said policyholder is inspected, it thereby is retired. Point D. If said policyholder has a deductible waiver, it thereby is inspected. Point E. If said policyholder has no beneficiary, it thereby is not a claimant. Point F. If said policyholder is retired, it thereby has no rider. Question: Statement: Yara has a rider. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017685", "pair_id": "u017685-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017685-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "5ca007107f6ff89a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017685-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has a peril factor of 49. Yara has no beneficiary. Yara has no deductible waiver.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby has an adjuster. Point B. If said policyholder has an adjuster, it thereby has a rider. Point C. If said policyholder has a peril factor short of 71, it thereby has a premium discount. Point D. If said policyholder is inspected, it thereby is retired. Point E. If said policyholder has a deductible waiver, it thereby is inspected. Point F. If said policyholder has no beneficiary, it thereby is not a claimant. Point G. If said policyholder is retired, it thereby has no rider. Question: Statement: Yara has a rider. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017685", "pair_id": "u017685-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017685-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "869eb367b0b3c403", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017685-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has a peril factor of 49. Yara has no beneficiary. Yara has no deductible waiver.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a premium discount, so it has an adjuster. No. 2 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it has a rider. No. 3 While the given policyholder is inspected, so it is retired. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it is inspected. No. 5 While the given policyholder has no beneficiary, so it is not a claimant. No. 6 While the given policyholder is retired, so it has no rider. Question: Is the claim \"Yara has a rider\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017685", "pair_id": "u017685-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017685-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "5ca007107f6ff89a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017685-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has a peril factor of 49. Yara has no beneficiary. Yara has no deductible waiver.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a premium discount, so it has an adjuster. No. 2 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it has a rider. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a peril factor that falls below 71, so it has a premium discount. No. 4 While the given policyholder is inspected, so it is retired. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it is inspected. No. 6 While the given policyholder has no beneficiary, so it is not a claimant. No. 7 While the given policyholder is retired, so it has no rider. Question: Is the claim \"Yara has a rider\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017685", "pair_id": "u017685-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017685-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "869eb367b0b3c403", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017693-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aurel has a mobility rank of 83. Elif has a pain level of 10. Elif is not symptomatic. Aurel has a pain level of 54. Aurel is not contagious. Elif has a mobility rank of 91. Elif is sedated. Aurel is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is bedridden. Provision 2: when the patient here has a mobility rank beyond 83, thus it is pregnant. Provision 3: when the patient here has a pulse rate beneath 53, thus it has a caregiver. Provision 4: when the patient here has a pulse rate at or above 53, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 5: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or below 83, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 6: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it is anemic. Provision 7: when the patient here has a pain level at or below 29, thus it is discharged. Provision 8: when the patient here is sedated, thus it is not rescheduled. Provision 9: when the patient here is contagious, thus it is rescheduled. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 9. Question: Which one describes Aurel?", "options": ["is bedridden", "is pregnant", "is hypertensive", "has a caregiver", "is waitlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is hypertensive", "unit_id": "u017693", "pair_id": "u017693-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017693-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "346de10bdb39d2c3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a2", "a9", "a5", "a4", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017693-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aurel has a mobility rank of 87. Elif has a pain level of 10. Elif is not symptomatic. Aurel has a pain level of 54. Aurel is not contagious. Elif has a mobility rank of 91. Elif is sedated. Aurel is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is bedridden. Provision 2: when the patient here has a mobility rank beyond 83, thus it is pregnant. Provision 3: when the patient here has a pulse rate beneath 53, thus it has a caregiver. Provision 4: when the patient here has a pulse rate at or above 53, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 5: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or below 83, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 6: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it is anemic. Provision 7: when the patient here has a pain level at or below 29, thus it is discharged. Provision 8: when the patient here is sedated, thus it is not rescheduled. Provision 9: when the patient here is contagious, thus it is rescheduled. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 9. Question: Which one describes Aurel?", "options": ["is bedridden", "is pregnant", "is hypertensive", "has a caregiver", "is waitlisted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is pregnant", "unit_id": "u017693", "pair_id": "u017693-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017693-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a43ad448f7fc129d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a2", "a9", "a5", "a4", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017693-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aurel has a mobility rank of 83. Elif has a pain level of 10. Elif is not symptomatic. Aurel has a pain level of 54. Aurel is not contagious. Elif has a mobility rank of 91. Elif is sedated. Aurel is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby is bedridden. Point B. If said patient has a mobility rank in excess of 83, it thereby is pregnant. Point C. If said patient has a pulse rate short of 53, it thereby has a caregiver. Point D. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 53, it thereby is waitlisted. Point E. If said patient has a mobility rank of maximum 83, it thereby is hypertensive. Point F. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby is anemic. Point G. If said patient has a pain level of maximum 29, it thereby is discharged. Point H. If said patient is sedated, it thereby is not rescheduled. Point I. If said patient is contagious, it thereby is rescheduled. Point H supersedes Point I. Question: Which choice is true for Aurel?", "options": ["is bedridden", "is pregnant", "is hypertensive", "has a caregiver", "is waitlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is hypertensive", "unit_id": "u017693", "pair_id": "u017693-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017693-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "346de10bdb39d2c3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a2", "a9", "a5", "a4", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017693-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aurel has a mobility rank of 87. Elif has a pain level of 10. Elif is not symptomatic. Aurel has a pain level of 54. Aurel is not contagious. Elif has a mobility rank of 91. Elif is sedated. Aurel is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby is bedridden. Point B. If said patient has a mobility rank in excess of 83, it thereby is pregnant. Point C. If said patient has a pulse rate short of 53, it thereby has a caregiver. Point D. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 53, it thereby is waitlisted. Point E. If said patient has a mobility rank of maximum 83, it thereby is hypertensive. Point F. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby is anemic. Point G. If said patient has a pain level of maximum 29, it thereby is discharged. Point H. If said patient is sedated, it thereby is not rescheduled. Point I. If said patient is contagious, it thereby is rescheduled. Point H supersedes Point I. Question: Which choice is true for Aurel?", "options": ["is bedridden", "is pregnant", "is hypertensive", "has a caregiver", "is waitlisted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is pregnant", "unit_id": "u017693", "pair_id": "u017693-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017693-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a43ad448f7fc129d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a2", "a9", "a5", "a4", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017693-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aurel has a mobility rank of 83. Elif has a pain level of 10. Elif is not symptomatic. Aurel has a pain level of 54. Aurel is not contagious. Elif has a mobility rank of 91. Elif is sedated. Aurel is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is bedridden. No. 2 While the given patient has a mobility rank that exceeds 83, so it is pregnant. No. 3 While the given patient has a pulse rate that falls below 53, so it has a caregiver. No. 4 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 53, so it is waitlisted. No. 5 While the given patient has a mobility rank not above 83, so it is hypertensive. No. 6 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is anemic. No. 7 While the given patient has a pain level not above 29, so it is discharged. No. 8 While the given patient is sedated, so it is not rescheduled. No. 9 While the given patient is contagious, so it is rescheduled. No. 8 wins over No. 9. Question: Select what holds for Aurel: which option?", "options": ["is bedridden", "is pregnant", "is hypertensive", "has a caregiver", "is waitlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is hypertensive", "unit_id": "u017693", "pair_id": "u017693-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017693-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "346de10bdb39d2c3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a2", "a9", "a5", "a4", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017693-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aurel has a mobility rank of 87. Elif has a pain level of 10. Elif is not symptomatic. Aurel has a pain level of 54. Aurel is not contagious. Elif has a mobility rank of 91. Elif is sedated. Aurel is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is bedridden. No. 2 While the given patient has a mobility rank that exceeds 83, so it is pregnant. No. 3 While the given patient has a pulse rate that falls below 53, so it has a caregiver. No. 4 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 53, so it is waitlisted. No. 5 While the given patient has a mobility rank not above 83, so it is hypertensive. No. 6 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is anemic. No. 7 While the given patient has a pain level not above 29, so it is discharged. No. 8 While the given patient is sedated, so it is not rescheduled. No. 9 While the given patient is contagious, so it is rescheduled. No. 8 wins over No. 9. Question: Select what holds for Aurel: which option?", "options": ["is bedridden", "is pregnant", "is hypertensive", "has a caregiver", "is waitlisted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is pregnant", "unit_id": "u017693", "pair_id": "u017693-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017693-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a43ad448f7fc129d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a2", "a9", "a5", "a4", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017745-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is encrypted. Halcyon has a latency budget of 21. Juno is encrypted. Juno has a latency budget of 1. Halcyon is not deprecated.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is not encrypted, that workload is containerized. Item B. When the workload is deprecated, that workload is isolated. Item C. When the workload has a latency budget of no less than 40, that workload is not isolated. Question: Can one infer that Halcyon is isolated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017745", "pair_id": "u017745-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017745-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "71c6ee45c846a472", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017745-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is encrypted. Halcyon has a latency budget of 21. Juno is encrypted. Juno has a latency budget of 1. Halcyon is not deprecated.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is not encrypted, that workload is containerized. Item B. When the workload is not deprecated, that workload is isolated. Item C. When the workload has a latency budget of no less than 40, that workload is not isolated. Question: Can one infer that Halcyon is isolated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017745", "pair_id": "u017745-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017745-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "b0ed98ed81d31fa4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017753-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is not reimbursed. Dmitri has no dashcam. Celeste is not reimbursed. Dmitri has a claim frequency of 25.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it is litigated. Section 2: a policyholder is a claimant provided that it has no beneficiary. Section 3: a policyholder has no adjuster provided that it has a dashcam. Section 4: a policyholder is bundled provided that it has no dashcam. Section 5: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it is not reimbursed. Section 6: a policyholder is litigated provided that it has no adjuster. Section 7: a policyholder is lapsed provided that it is reimbursed. Section 8: a policyholder has no beneficiary provided that it is bundled. Section 1 lapses for a policyholder if it has a claim frequency lower than 14. Question: Which statement fits Dmitri?", "options": ["has flood coverage", "is a claimant"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a claimant", "unit_id": "u017753", "pair_id": "u017753-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017753-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "773eb83c07301faf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a1"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u017753-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is reimbursed. Dmitri has no dashcam. Celeste is not reimbursed. Dmitri has a claim frequency of 25.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it is litigated. Section 2: a policyholder is a claimant provided that it has no beneficiary. Section 3: a policyholder has no adjuster provided that it has a dashcam. Section 4: a policyholder is bundled provided that it has no dashcam. Section 5: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it is not reimbursed. Section 6: a policyholder is litigated provided that it has no adjuster. Section 7: a policyholder is lapsed provided that it is reimbursed. Section 8: a policyholder has no beneficiary provided that it is bundled. Section 1 lapses for a policyholder if it has a claim frequency lower than 14. Question: Which statement fits Dmitri?", "options": ["has flood coverage", "is a claimant"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a claimant", "unit_id": "u017753", "pair_id": "u017753-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017753-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "27fe8e31a73de5a7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a1"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u017784-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar is not interdisciplinary. Hadar has a citation index of 41. Aldebaran has a citation index of 36. Hadar has a field site. Izar is a pilot study. Aldebaran is not a pilot study. Izar has no field site. Aldebaran has a field site. Hadar is not a pilot study. Electra has a field site.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is not collaborative provided that it is a pilot study. Section 2: a proposal is budgeted provided that it is collaborative. Section 3: a proposal has a postdoc provided that it has no field site. Section 4: a proposal is shortlisted provided that it is not a pilot study. Section 5: a proposal is not shortlisted provided that it has a citation index of 51 or lower. Section 6: a proposal is collaborative provided that it is not a pilot study. Section 1 lapses for a proposal if it has a citation index of 48 or higher. Section 6 lapses for a proposal if it has a citation index lower than 48. Section 3 lapses for a proposal if it is a pilot study. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it has a citation index of 46 or higher. Section 6 lapses for a proposal if it is interdisciplinary. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Izar is collaborative. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017784", "pair_id": "u017784-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017784-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3bc302b3e5bebbd7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u017784-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar is not interdisciplinary. Hadar has a citation index of 41. Aldebaran has a citation index of 36. Hadar has a field site. Izar is a pilot study. Aldebaran is not a pilot study. Izar has no field site. Aldebaran has a field site. Hadar is not a pilot study. Electra has a field site.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is not collaborative provided that it is a pilot study. Section 2: a proposal is budgeted provided that it is collaborative. Section 3: a proposal has a postdoc provided that it has no field site. Section 4: a proposal is shortlisted provided that it is not a pilot study. Section 5: a proposal is not shortlisted provided that it has a citation index of 51 or lower. Section 6: a proposal is collaborative provided that it is a pilot study. Section 1 lapses for a proposal if it has a citation index of 48 or higher. Section 6 lapses for a proposal if it has a citation index lower than 48. Section 3 lapses for a proposal if it is a pilot study. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it has a citation index of 46 or higher. Section 6 lapses for a proposal if it is interdisciplinary. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Izar is collaborative. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017784", "pair_id": "u017784-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017784-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fe616b98e0a7f40b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u017784-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar is not interdisciplinary. Hadar has a citation index of 41. Aldebaran has a citation index of 36. Hadar has a field site. Izar is a pilot study. Aldebaran is not a pilot study. Izar has no field site. Aldebaran has a field site. Hadar is not a pilot study. Electra has a field site.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it is not collaborative. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is collaborative: then it is budgeted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has no field site: then it has a postdoc. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is not a pilot study: then it is shortlisted. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has a citation index no higher than 51: then it is not shortlisted. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is not a pilot study: then it is collaborative. Policy I is waived if that proposal has a citation index no lower than 48. Policy VI is waived if that proposal has a citation index smaller than 48. Policy III is waived if that proposal is a pilot study. Policy II is waived if that proposal has a citation index no lower than 46. Policy VI is waived if that proposal is interdisciplinary. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Izar is collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017784", "pair_id": "u017784-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017784-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3bc302b3e5bebbd7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u017784-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar is not interdisciplinary. Hadar has a citation index of 41. Aldebaran has a citation index of 36. Hadar has a field site. Izar is a pilot study. Aldebaran is not a pilot study. Izar has no field site. Aldebaran has a field site. Hadar is not a pilot study. Electra has a field site.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it is not collaborative. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is collaborative: then it is budgeted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has no field site: then it has a postdoc. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is not a pilot study: then it is shortlisted. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has a citation index no higher than 51: then it is not shortlisted. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it is collaborative. Policy I is waived if that proposal has a citation index no lower than 48. Policy VI is waived if that proposal has a citation index smaller than 48. Policy III is waived if that proposal is a pilot study. Policy II is waived if that proposal has a citation index no lower than 46. Policy VI is waived if that proposal is interdisciplinary. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Izar is collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017784", "pair_id": "u017784-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017784-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fe616b98e0a7f40b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u017784-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar is not interdisciplinary. Hadar has a citation index of 41. Aldebaran has a citation index of 36. Hadar has a field site. Izar is a pilot study. Aldebaran is not a pilot study. Izar has no field site. Aldebaran has a field site. Hadar is not a pilot study. Electra has a field site.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then is not collaborative. #2 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then is budgeted. #3 Each time a proposal has no field site, it then has a postdoc. #4 Each time a proposal is not a pilot study, it then is shortlisted. #5 Each time a proposal has a citation index of 51 or below, it then is not shortlisted. #6 Each time a proposal is not a pilot study, it then is collaborative. #1 is set aside if a proposal has a citation index of 48 or above. #6 is set aside if a proposal has a citation index less than 48. #3 is set aside if a proposal is a pilot study. #2 is set aside if a proposal has a citation index of 46 or above. #6 is set aside if a proposal is interdisciplinary. #4 yields to #5. #1 yields to #6. Question: Do the terms above show that Izar is collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017784", "pair_id": "u017784-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017784-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3bc302b3e5bebbd7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u017784-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar is not interdisciplinary. Hadar has a citation index of 41. Aldebaran has a citation index of 36. Hadar has a field site. Izar is a pilot study. Aldebaran is not a pilot study. Izar has no field site. Aldebaran has a field site. Hadar is not a pilot study. Electra has a field site.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then is not collaborative. #2 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then is budgeted. #3 Each time a proposal has no field site, it then has a postdoc. #4 Each time a proposal is not a pilot study, it then is shortlisted. #5 Each time a proposal has a citation index of 51 or below, it then is not shortlisted. #6 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then is collaborative. #1 is set aside if a proposal has a citation index of 48 or above. #6 is set aside if a proposal has a citation index less than 48. #3 is set aside if a proposal is a pilot study. #2 is set aside if a proposal has a citation index of 46 or above. #6 is set aside if a proposal is interdisciplinary. #4 yields to #5. #1 yields to #6. Question: Do the terms above show that Izar is collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017784", "pair_id": "u017784-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017784-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fe616b98e0a7f40b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u017801-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quasar is encrypted. Borealis has a CPU quota of 12. Borealis is encrypted. Juno has no dedicated host. Juno has a CPU quota of 10. Juno is not encrypted. Quasar has no dedicated host. Borealis is not isolated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is not encrypted, it then is monitored. #2 Each time a workload is not isolated, it then is sandboxed. #3 Each time a workload is encrypted, it then is idle. #4 Each time a workload is isolated, it then has a GPU. #5 Each time a workload has a dedicated host, it then has no GPU. #6 Each time a workload has a CPU quota of 35 or above, it then is backed up. #7 Each time a workload has a dedicated host, it then is deprecated. #8 Each time a workload has a CPU quota less than 35, it then is patched. #5 yields to #4. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Quasar?", "options": ["has a GPU", "is backed up", "is patched", "is sandboxed", "is idle", "is monitored"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is idle", "unit_id": "u017801", "pair_id": "u017801-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017801-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b2288afab2009773", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a7", "a6", "a5", "a8", "a3", "a10"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017801-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quasar is encrypted. Borealis has a CPU quota of 12. Borealis is encrypted. Juno has no dedicated host. Juno has a CPU quota of 10. Juno is not encrypted. Quasar has a dedicated host. Borealis is not isolated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is not encrypted, it then is monitored. #2 Each time a workload is not isolated, it then is sandboxed. #3 Each time a workload is encrypted, it then is idle. #4 Each time a workload is isolated, it then has a GPU. #5 Each time a workload has a dedicated host, it then has no GPU. #6 Each time a workload has a CPU quota of 35 or above, it then is backed up. #7 Each time a workload has a dedicated host, it then is deprecated. #8 Each time a workload has a CPU quota less than 35, it then is patched. #5 yields to #4. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Quasar?", "options": ["has a GPU", "is backed up", "is patched", "is sandboxed", "is idle", "is monitored"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is idle", "unit_id": "u017801", "pair_id": "u017801-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017801-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fdf911b39c8f7e69", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a7", "a6", "a5", "a8", "a3", "a10"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017845-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is sharded. Sierra is autoscaled. Kestrel is not containerized. Halcyon is autoscaled. Sierra is virtualized. Kestrel is idle. Halcyon is not virtualized. Halcyon has no public endpoint. Sierra has no public endpoint. Kestrel is not autoscaled. Sierra is not cached. Sierra is containerized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a dedicated host while is containerized while is autoscaled, thus it is not sandboxed. Provision 2: when the workload here is virtualized, thus it is stateless. Provision 3: when the workload here has a dedicated host while has a GPU while is virtualized, thus it is sandboxed. Provision 4: when the workload here is stateless, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 5: when the workload here is sharded while is idle, thus it is backed up. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here is idle. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here has a public endpoint while is cached. Question: Would it be right to say that Sierra is sandboxed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017845", "pair_id": "u017845-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017845-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0950ca0a95aabab1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017845-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is sharded. Sierra is autoscaled. Kestrel is not containerized. Halcyon is autoscaled. Sierra is virtualized. Kestrel is idle. Sierra is not idle. Halcyon is not virtualized. Halcyon has no public endpoint. Sierra has no public endpoint. Kestrel is not autoscaled. Sierra is not cached. Sierra is containerized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a dedicated host while is containerized while is autoscaled, thus it is not sandboxed. Provision 2: when the workload here is virtualized, thus it is stateless. Provision 3: when the workload here has a dedicated host while has a GPU while is virtualized, thus it is sandboxed. Provision 4: when the workload here is stateless, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 5: when the workload here is sharded while is idle, thus it is backed up. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here is idle. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here has a public endpoint while is cached. Question: Would it be right to say that Sierra is sandboxed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017845", "pair_id": "u017845-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017845-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "618bf223f3d83fd5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017845-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is sharded. Sierra is autoscaled. Kestrel is not containerized. Halcyon is autoscaled. Sierra is virtualized. Kestrel is idle. Halcyon is not virtualized. Halcyon has no public endpoint. Sierra has no public endpoint. Kestrel is not autoscaled. Sierra is not cached. Sierra is containerized.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a dedicated host and likewise is containerized and likewise is autoscaled, so it is not sandboxed. No. 2 While the given workload is virtualized, so it is stateless. No. 3 While the given workload has a dedicated host and likewise has a GPU and likewise is virtualized, so it is sandboxed. No. 4 While the given workload is stateless, so it has a dedicated host. No. 5 While the given workload is sharded and likewise is idle, so it is backed up. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload is idle. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload has a public endpoint and likewise is cached. Question: Is the claim \"Sierra is sandboxed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017845", "pair_id": "u017845-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017845-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0950ca0a95aabab1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017845-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is sharded. Sierra is autoscaled. Kestrel is not containerized. Halcyon is autoscaled. Sierra is virtualized. Kestrel is idle. Sierra is not idle. Halcyon is not virtualized. Halcyon has no public endpoint. Sierra has no public endpoint. Kestrel is not autoscaled. Sierra is not cached. Sierra is containerized.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a dedicated host and likewise is containerized and likewise is autoscaled, so it is not sandboxed. No. 2 While the given workload is virtualized, so it is stateless. No. 3 While the given workload has a dedicated host and likewise has a GPU and likewise is virtualized, so it is sandboxed. No. 4 While the given workload is stateless, so it has a dedicated host. No. 5 While the given workload is sharded and likewise is idle, so it is backed up. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload is idle. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload has a public endpoint and likewise is cached. Question: Is the claim \"Sierra is sandboxed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017845", "pair_id": "u017845-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017845-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "618bf223f3d83fd5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017880-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk has a debt ratio of 51. Bastien is not a homeowner. Anouk is not a homeowner. Bastien has a debt ratio of 90. Anouk is vetted. Anouk has a risk tier of 80.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it is delinquent. (2) If a borrower has a risk tier below 49, then it is creditworthy. (3) If a borrower is overdrawn, then it has a mortgage. (4) If a borrower is pensioned, then it has no mortgage. (5) If a borrower is creditworthy, then it is prequalified. (6) If a borrower is a homeowner, then it is not creditworthy. (7) If a borrower has a lien, then it is overdrawn. (8) If a borrower has a debt ratio above 50, then it is pensioned. (9) If a borrower has a credit rating of at most 81, then it is audited. (10) If a borrower is foreclosed, then it is not overdrawn. (11) If a borrower is prequalified, then it is not delinquent. (12) If a borrower is vetted, then it is bankrupt. (13) If a borrower is audited, then it is not prequalified. When (11) and (1) clash, (11) prevails. When (5) and (13) clash, (5) prevails. When (3) and (4) clash, (3) prevails. When (7) and (10) clash, (7) prevails. When (6) and (2) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Anouk is not delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017880", "pair_id": "u017880-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017880-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3b7906002a80708a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a14", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017880-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk has a debt ratio of 51. Bastien is not a homeowner. Anouk is not a homeowner. Bastien has a debt ratio of 90. Anouk is vetted. Anouk has a risk tier of 80.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it is delinquent. (2) If a borrower has a risk tier below 49, then it is creditworthy. (3) If a borrower is overdrawn, then it has a mortgage. (4) If a borrower is pensioned, then it has no mortgage. (5) If a borrower is creditworthy, then it is prequalified. (6) If a borrower is a homeowner, then it is not creditworthy. (7) If a borrower has a lien, then it is overdrawn. (8) If a borrower has a debt ratio above 71, then it is pensioned. (9) If a borrower has a credit rating of at most 81, then it is audited. (10) If a borrower is foreclosed, then it is not overdrawn. (11) If a borrower is prequalified, then it is not delinquent. (12) If a borrower is vetted, then it is bankrupt. (13) If a borrower is audited, then it is not prequalified. When (11) and (1) clash, (11) prevails. When (5) and (13) clash, (5) prevails. When (3) and (4) clash, (3) prevails. When (7) and (10) clash, (7) prevails. When (6) and (2) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Anouk is not delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017880", "pair_id": "u017880-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017880-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2336408c2cdef9f6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a14", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017880-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk has a debt ratio of 51. Bastien is not a homeowner. Anouk is not a homeowner. Bastien has a debt ratio of 90. Anouk is vetted. Anouk has a risk tier of 80.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a mortgage, it also is delinquent. Clause 2: once any borrower has a risk tier under 49, it also is creditworthy. Clause 3: once any borrower is overdrawn, it also has a mortgage. Clause 4: once any borrower is pensioned, it also has no mortgage. Clause 5: once any borrower is creditworthy, it also is prequalified. Clause 6: once any borrower is a homeowner, it also is not creditworthy. Clause 7: once any borrower has a lien, it also is overdrawn. Clause 8: once any borrower has a debt ratio over 50, it also is pensioned. Clause 9: once any borrower has a credit rating of 81 or less, it also is audited. Clause 10: once any borrower is foreclosed, it also is not overdrawn. Clause 11: once any borrower is prequalified, it also is not delinquent. Clause 12: once any borrower is vetted, it also is bankrupt. Clause 13: once any borrower is audited, it also is not prequalified. Clause 11 overrides Clause 1. Clause 5 overrides Clause 13. Clause 3 overrides Clause 4. Clause 7 overrides Clause 10. Clause 6 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Anouk is not delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017880", "pair_id": "u017880-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017880-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3b7906002a80708a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a14", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017880-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk has a debt ratio of 51. Bastien is not a homeowner. Anouk is not a homeowner. Bastien has a debt ratio of 90. Anouk is vetted. Anouk has a risk tier of 80.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a mortgage, it also is delinquent. Clause 2: once any borrower has a risk tier under 49, it also is creditworthy. Clause 3: once any borrower is overdrawn, it also has a mortgage. Clause 4: once any borrower is pensioned, it also has no mortgage. Clause 5: once any borrower is creditworthy, it also is prequalified. Clause 6: once any borrower is a homeowner, it also is not creditworthy. Clause 7: once any borrower has a lien, it also is overdrawn. Clause 8: once any borrower has a debt ratio over 71, it also is pensioned. Clause 9: once any borrower has a credit rating of 81 or less, it also is audited. Clause 10: once any borrower is foreclosed, it also is not overdrawn. Clause 11: once any borrower is prequalified, it also is not delinquent. Clause 12: once any borrower is vetted, it also is bankrupt. Clause 13: once any borrower is audited, it also is not prequalified. Clause 11 overrides Clause 1. Clause 5 overrides Clause 13. Clause 3 overrides Clause 4. Clause 7 overrides Clause 10. Clause 6 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Anouk is not delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017880", "pair_id": "u017880-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017880-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2336408c2cdef9f6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a14", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017880-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk has a debt ratio of 51. Bastien is not a homeowner. Anouk is not a homeowner. Bastien has a debt ratio of 90. Anouk is vetted. Anouk has a risk tier of 80.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower has a mortgage, that borrower is delinquent. Item B. When the borrower has a risk tier of less than 49, that borrower is creditworthy. Item C. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower has a mortgage. Item D. When the borrower is pensioned, that borrower has no mortgage. Item E. When the borrower is creditworthy, that borrower is prequalified. Item F. When the borrower is a homeowner, that borrower is not creditworthy. Item G. When the borrower has a lien, that borrower is overdrawn. Item H. When the borrower has a debt ratio of more than 50, that borrower is pensioned. Item I. When the borrower has a credit rating of no more than 81, that borrower is audited. Item J. When the borrower is foreclosed, that borrower is not overdrawn. Item K. When the borrower is prequalified, that borrower is not delinquent. Item L. When the borrower is vetted, that borrower is bankrupt. Item M. When the borrower is audited, that borrower is not prequalified. Item K outranks Item A. Item E outranks Item M. Item C outranks Item D. Item G outranks Item J. Item F outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Anouk is not delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017880", "pair_id": "u017880-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017880-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3b7906002a80708a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a14", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017880-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk has a debt ratio of 51. Bastien is not a homeowner. Anouk is not a homeowner. Bastien has a debt ratio of 90. Anouk is vetted. Anouk has a risk tier of 80.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower has a mortgage, that borrower is delinquent. Item B. When the borrower has a risk tier of less than 49, that borrower is creditworthy. Item C. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower has a mortgage. Item D. When the borrower is pensioned, that borrower has no mortgage. Item E. When the borrower is creditworthy, that borrower is prequalified. Item F. When the borrower is a homeowner, that borrower is not creditworthy. Item G. When the borrower has a lien, that borrower is overdrawn. Item H. When the borrower has a debt ratio of more than 71, that borrower is pensioned. Item I. When the borrower has a credit rating of no more than 81, that borrower is audited. Item J. When the borrower is foreclosed, that borrower is not overdrawn. Item K. When the borrower is prequalified, that borrower is not delinquent. Item L. When the borrower is vetted, that borrower is bankrupt. Item M. When the borrower is audited, that borrower is not prequalified. Item K outranks Item A. Item E outranks Item M. Item C outranks Item D. Item G outranks Item J. Item F outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Anouk is not delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017880", "pair_id": "u017880-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017880-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2336408c2cdef9f6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a14", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017929-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda has an aptitude quotient of 92. Petra has a commute radius of 59. Hedda has a notice period of 90. Hedda has a commute radius of 29.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate has a seniority step of more than 21, that candidate is recommended. Item B. When the candidate has a commute radius of no more than 58, that candidate is probationary. Item C. When the candidate has an aptitude quotient of no less than 23, that candidate has a background screening. Item D. When the candidate is fingerprinted, that candidate has a visa. Item E. When the candidate has a commute radius of less than 30, that candidate is headhunted. Item F. When the candidate has a notice period of more than 22, that candidate is a veteran. Item G. When the candidate has a background screening, that candidate is relocating. Item H. When the candidate has a notice period of no more than 22, that candidate is bonded. Item I. When the candidate has an aptitude quotient of less than 23, that candidate is certified. Item J. When the candidate has a seniority step of no more than 21, that candidate has a portfolio. Item K. When the candidate has a commute radius of more than 58, that candidate is eligible. Question: What applies to Petra?", "options": ["is certified", "is probationary", "has a background screening", "is recommended", "is a veteran", "is bonded", "has a portfolio", "is eligible"], "target": 7, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is eligible", "unit_id": "u017929", "pair_id": "u017929-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017929-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "12c7fe8bc10c0169", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a2", "a7", "a3", "a10", "a5", "a8", "a0"]}, "attempt": 31}}
{"id": "syn-u017929-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda has an aptitude quotient of 92. Petra has a commute radius of 43. Hedda has a notice period of 90. Hedda has a commute radius of 29.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate has a seniority step of more than 21, that candidate is recommended. Item B. When the candidate has a commute radius of no more than 58, that candidate is probationary. Item C. When the candidate has an aptitude quotient of no less than 23, that candidate has a background screening. Item D. When the candidate is fingerprinted, that candidate has a visa. Item E. When the candidate has a commute radius of less than 30, that candidate is headhunted. Item F. When the candidate has a notice period of more than 22, that candidate is a veteran. Item G. When the candidate has a background screening, that candidate is relocating. Item H. When the candidate has a notice period of no more than 22, that candidate is bonded. Item I. When the candidate has an aptitude quotient of less than 23, that candidate is certified. Item J. When the candidate has a seniority step of no more than 21, that candidate has a portfolio. Item K. When the candidate has a commute radius of more than 58, that candidate is eligible. Question: What applies to Petra?", "options": ["is certified", "is probationary", "has a background screening", "is recommended", "is a veteran", "is bonded", "has a portfolio", "is eligible"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is probationary", "unit_id": "u017929", "pair_id": "u017929-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017929-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "61e757c0afdbf154", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a2", "a7", "a3", "a10", "a5", "a8", "a0"]}, "attempt": 31}}
{"id": "syn-u017933-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar has a changelog. Feldspar is not versioned. Feldspar is benchmarked. Pumice has no changelog. Pumice is versioned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is profiled, so it is tested. No. 2 While the given build is not documented, so it has a security advisory. No. 3 While the given build is versioned, so it is fuzzed. No. 4 While the given build is benchmarked, so it is profiled. No. 5 While the given build is benchmarked, so it has a feature toggle. No. 6 While the given build is fuzzed, so it is documented. No. 7 While the given build has a changelog, so it is not backported. No. 8 While the given build is tested, so it has no security advisory. Question: Is the claim \"Pumice has a security advisory\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017933", "pair_id": "u017933-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017933-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "b3d59e5bbb9d4745", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017933-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar has a changelog. Feldspar is not versioned. Feldspar is benchmarked. Pumice has no changelog. Pumice is versioned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is profiled, so it is tested. No. 2 While the given build is documented, so it has a security advisory. No. 3 While the given build is versioned, so it is fuzzed. No. 4 While the given build is benchmarked, so it is profiled. No. 5 While the given build is benchmarked, so it has a feature toggle. No. 6 While the given build is fuzzed, so it is documented. No. 7 While the given build has a changelog, so it is not backported. No. 8 While the given build is tested, so it has no security advisory. Question: Is the claim \"Pumice has a security advisory\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017933", "pair_id": "u017933-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017933-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "848a19a7c0942820", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017959-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not bilingual. Mads is probationary. Mads is a graduate. Olek is not a graduate. Olek is certified. Olek is fingerprinted. Mads is fingerprinted. Mads is certified.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is onboarded provided that it is a graduate as well as is bilingual. Section 2: a candidate is not interviewed provided that it is fingerprinted as well as is not bilingual as well as is probationary. Section 3: a candidate is not onboarded provided that it is a graduate as well as is not bilingual. Section 4: a candidate is licensed provided that it is certified as well as has a background screening. Section 5: a candidate is not freelance provided that it is not fingerprinted. Question: Mads is onboarded. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017959", "pair_id": "u017959-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017959-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "a981f8b6de28aa6a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u017959-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not bilingual. Mads is probationary. Mads is a graduate. Olek is not a graduate. Olek is certified. Olek is fingerprinted. Mads is not fingerprinted. Mads is certified.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is onboarded provided that it is a graduate as well as is bilingual. Section 2: a candidate is not interviewed provided that it is fingerprinted as well as is not bilingual as well as is probationary. Section 3: a candidate is not onboarded provided that it is a graduate as well as is not bilingual. Section 4: a candidate is licensed provided that it is certified as well as has a background screening. Section 5: a candidate is not freelance provided that it is not fingerprinted. Question: Mads is onboarded. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u017959", "pair_id": "u017959-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u017959-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "9576d3232a2302cd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u017969-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is subrogated. Zdenek is not subrogated. Zdenek has no flood coverage. Viggo has a payout ceiling of 46. Yara has flood coverage. Una has no flood coverage. Viggo has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is not reinstated. Clause 2: once any policyholder is a claimant, it also is covered. Clause 3: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also has a premium discount. Clause 4: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling under 46, it also is a claimant. Clause 5: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is not reimbursed. Clause 6: once any policyholder is covered, it also is reimbursed. Clause 7: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also is lapsed. Question: Does it follow that Viggo is reimbursed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u017969", "pair_id": "u017969-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017969-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "8d0c2fecc2852dd5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u017969-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is subrogated. Zdenek is not subrogated. Zdenek has no flood coverage. Viggo has a payout ceiling of 46. Yara has flood coverage. Una has no flood coverage. Viggo has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is not reinstated. Clause 2: once any policyholder is a claimant, it also is covered. Clause 3: once any policyholder has flood coverage, it also has a premium discount. Clause 4: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling under 86, it also is a claimant. Clause 5: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is not reimbursed. Clause 6: once any policyholder is covered, it also is reimbursed. Clause 7: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also is lapsed. Question: Does it follow that Viggo is reimbursed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u017969", "pair_id": "u017969-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u017969-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "bf1f817b90beb635", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018014-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is resubmitted. Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is translational. Betelgeuse is interdisciplinary. Betelgeuse has a field site. Betelgeuse has industry backing. Betelgeuse is a pilot study. Betelgeuse is not multicenter.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is exploratory, thus it is cofunded. Provision 2: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is renewed, thus it is collaborative. Provision 3: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is translational while is renewed, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 4: when the proposal here has a patent filing while has industry backing while is resubmitted, thus it is budgeted. Provision 5: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is multicenter, thus it is peer reviewed. Provision 6: when the proposal here has a patent filing while has a field site, thus it has ethics clearance. Provision 7: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is preregistered, thus it is endorsed. Provision 8: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is a pilot study, thus it has a steering committee. Provision 9: when the proposal here is interdisciplinary, thus it is embargoed. Provision 5 has no effect when the proposal here is a pilot study. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here is renewed. Provision 7 has no effect when the proposal here is exploratory. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here is shortlisted. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here is a pilot study. Provision 6 has no effect when the proposal here is translational. Question: Which one describes Betelgeuse?", "options": ["is cofunded", "is endorsed", "is longitudinal", "has ethics clearance", "is collaborative", "has a steering committee", "is peer reviewed", "is budgeted"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a steering committee", "unit_id": "u018014", "pair_id": "u018014-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018014-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "902f092f2c6be7b6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a0", "a17", "a9", "a16", "a4", "a10", "a19"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u018014-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is resubmitted. Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is translational. Betelgeuse is interdisciplinary. Betelgeuse has a field site. Betelgeuse has industry backing. Betelgeuse is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse is not multicenter.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is exploratory, thus it is cofunded. Provision 2: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is renewed, thus it is collaborative. Provision 3: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is translational while is renewed, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 4: when the proposal here has a patent filing while has industry backing while is resubmitted, thus it is budgeted. Provision 5: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is multicenter, thus it is peer reviewed. Provision 6: when the proposal here has a patent filing while has a field site, thus it has ethics clearance. Provision 7: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is preregistered, thus it is endorsed. Provision 8: when the proposal here has a patent filing while is a pilot study, thus it has a steering committee. Provision 9: when the proposal here is interdisciplinary, thus it is embargoed. Provision 5 has no effect when the proposal here is a pilot study. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here is renewed. Provision 7 has no effect when the proposal here is exploratory. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here is shortlisted. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here is a pilot study. Provision 6 has no effect when the proposal here is translational. Question: Which one describes Betelgeuse?", "options": ["is cofunded", "is endorsed", "is longitudinal", "has ethics clearance", "is collaborative", "has a steering committee", "is peer reviewed", "is budgeted"], "target": 7, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is budgeted", "unit_id": "u018014", "pair_id": "u018014-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018014-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ac836a2d74269e71", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a0", "a17", "a9", "a16", "a4", "a10", "a19"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u018014-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is resubmitted. Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is translational. Betelgeuse is interdisciplinary. Betelgeuse has a field site. Betelgeuse has industry backing. Betelgeuse is a pilot study. Betelgeuse is not multicenter.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has a patent filing and further is exploratory, it thereby is cofunded. Point B. If said proposal has a patent filing and further is renewed, it thereby is collaborative. Point C. If said proposal has a patent filing and further is translational and further is renewed, it thereby is longitudinal. Point D. If said proposal has a patent filing and further has industry backing and further is resubmitted, it thereby is budgeted. Point E. If said proposal has a patent filing and further is multicenter, it thereby is peer reviewed. Point F. If said proposal has a patent filing and further has a field site, it thereby has ethics clearance. Point G. If said proposal has a patent filing and further is preregistered, it thereby is endorsed. Point H. If said proposal has a patent filing and further is a pilot study, it thereby has a steering committee. Point I. If said proposal is interdisciplinary, it thereby is embargoed. Point E is cancelled if said proposal is a pilot study. Point D is cancelled if said proposal is renewed. Point G is cancelled if said proposal is exploratory. Point B is cancelled if said proposal is shortlisted. Point D is cancelled if said proposal is a pilot study. Point F is cancelled if said proposal is translational. Question: Which choice is true for Betelgeuse?", "options": ["is cofunded", "is endorsed", "is longitudinal", "has ethics clearance", "is collaborative", "has a steering committee", "is peer reviewed", "is budgeted"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a steering committee", "unit_id": "u018014", "pair_id": "u018014-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018014-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "902f092f2c6be7b6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a0", "a17", "a9", "a16", "a4", "a10", "a19"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u018014-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is resubmitted. Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is translational. Betelgeuse is interdisciplinary. Betelgeuse has a field site. Betelgeuse has industry backing. Betelgeuse is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse is not multicenter.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has a patent filing and further is exploratory, it thereby is cofunded. Point B. If said proposal has a patent filing and further is renewed, it thereby is collaborative. Point C. If said proposal has a patent filing and further is translational and further is renewed, it thereby is longitudinal. Point D. If said proposal has a patent filing and further has industry backing and further is resubmitted, it thereby is budgeted. Point E. If said proposal has a patent filing and further is multicenter, it thereby is peer reviewed. Point F. If said proposal has a patent filing and further has a field site, it thereby has ethics clearance. Point G. If said proposal has a patent filing and further is preregistered, it thereby is endorsed. Point H. If said proposal has a patent filing and further is a pilot study, it thereby has a steering committee. Point I. If said proposal is interdisciplinary, it thereby is embargoed. Point E is cancelled if said proposal is a pilot study. Point D is cancelled if said proposal is renewed. Point G is cancelled if said proposal is exploratory. Point B is cancelled if said proposal is shortlisted. Point D is cancelled if said proposal is a pilot study. Point F is cancelled if said proposal is translational. Question: Which choice is true for Betelgeuse?", "options": ["is cofunded", "is endorsed", "is longitudinal", "has ethics clearance", "is collaborative", "has a steering committee", "is peer reviewed", "is budgeted"], "target": 7, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is budgeted", "unit_id": "u018014", "pair_id": "u018014-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018014-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ac836a2d74269e71", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a0", "a17", "a9", "a16", "a4", "a10", "a19"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u018014-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is resubmitted. Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is translational. Betelgeuse is interdisciplinary. Betelgeuse has a field site. Betelgeuse has industry backing. Betelgeuse is a pilot study. Betelgeuse is not multicenter.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is exploratory, so it is cofunded. No. 2 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is renewed, so it is collaborative. No. 3 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is translational and likewise is renewed, so it is longitudinal. No. 4 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise has industry backing and likewise is resubmitted, so it is budgeted. No. 5 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is multicenter, so it is peer reviewed. No. 6 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise has a field site, so it has ethics clearance. No. 7 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is preregistered, so it is endorsed. No. 8 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is a pilot study, so it has a steering committee. No. 9 While the given proposal is interdisciplinary, so it is embargoed. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given proposal is a pilot study. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal is renewed. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given proposal is exploratory. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given proposal is shortlisted. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal is a pilot study. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given proposal is translational. Question: Select what holds for Betelgeuse: which option?", "options": ["is cofunded", "is endorsed", "is longitudinal", "has ethics clearance", "is collaborative", "has a steering committee", "is peer reviewed", "is budgeted"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a steering committee", "unit_id": "u018014", "pair_id": "u018014-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018014-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "902f092f2c6be7b6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a0", "a17", "a9", "a16", "a4", "a10", "a19"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u018014-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is resubmitted. Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is translational. Betelgeuse is interdisciplinary. Betelgeuse has a field site. Betelgeuse has industry backing. Betelgeuse is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse is not multicenter.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is exploratory, so it is cofunded. No. 2 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is renewed, so it is collaborative. No. 3 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is translational and likewise is renewed, so it is longitudinal. No. 4 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise has industry backing and likewise is resubmitted, so it is budgeted. No. 5 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is multicenter, so it is peer reviewed. No. 6 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise has a field site, so it has ethics clearance. No. 7 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is preregistered, so it is endorsed. No. 8 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is a pilot study, so it has a steering committee. No. 9 While the given proposal is interdisciplinary, so it is embargoed. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given proposal is a pilot study. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal is renewed. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given proposal is exploratory. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given proposal is shortlisted. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal is a pilot study. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given proposal is translational. Question: Select what holds for Betelgeuse: which option?", "options": ["is cofunded", "is endorsed", "is longitudinal", "has ethics clearance", "is collaborative", "has a steering committee", "is peer reviewed", "is budgeted"], "target": 7, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is budgeted", "unit_id": "u018014", "pair_id": "u018014-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018014-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ac836a2d74269e71", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a0", "a17", "a9", "a16", "a4", "a10", "a19"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u018035-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not fuzzed. Zircon has a defect tally of 57. Zircon is not reverted. Zircon is compiled. Zircon is not benchmarked. Zircon is localized. Zircon is not profiled.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is not localized, that build is not tagged. Item B. When the build is reverted, that build is not tested. Item C. When the build is backported, that build has no migration script. Item D. When the build is backported, that build has a migration script. Item E. When the build is reverted, that build is not backported. Item F. When the build has a defect tally of no less than 56, that build has no feature toggle. Item G. When the build is flaky, that build has a feature toggle. Item H. When the build is profiled, that build is tested. Item I. When the build is compiled, that build is backported. Item H is suspended when the build is fuzzed. Item D is suspended when the build is benchmarked. Item D is suspended when the build is fuzzed. Item I is suspended when the build is profiled. Item C is suspended when the build is not fuzzed. Item E outranks Item I. Item G outranks Item F. Item B outranks Item H. Item C outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Zircon has a migration script?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018035", "pair_id": "u018035-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018035-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3af61b38e60868d5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u018035-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is fuzzed. Zircon has a defect tally of 57. Zircon is not reverted. Zircon is compiled. Zircon is not benchmarked. Zircon is localized. Zircon is not profiled.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is not localized, that build is not tagged. Item B. When the build is reverted, that build is not tested. Item C. When the build is backported, that build has no migration script. Item D. When the build is backported, that build has a migration script. Item E. When the build is reverted, that build is not backported. Item F. When the build has a defect tally of no less than 56, that build has no feature toggle. Item G. When the build is flaky, that build has a feature toggle. Item H. When the build is profiled, that build is tested. Item I. When the build is compiled, that build is backported. Item H is suspended when the build is fuzzed. Item D is suspended when the build is benchmarked. Item D is suspended when the build is fuzzed. Item I is suspended when the build is profiled. Item C is suspended when the build is not fuzzed. Item E outranks Item I. Item G outranks Item F. Item B outranks Item H. Item C outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Zircon has a migration script?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018035", "pair_id": "u018035-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018035-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "acbd4de06c3a6bc4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u018054-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not fuzzed.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is fuzzed, then it is linted. (2) If a build is minified, then it has a security advisory. (2) is void if the build is not experimental. Question: Is it true that Quartz is experimental?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u018054", "pair_id": "u018054-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018054-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0a9b75d2971fc9aa", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018054-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is fuzzed.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is fuzzed, then it is linted. (2) If a build is minified, then it has a security advisory. (2) is void if the build is not experimental. Question: Is it true that Quartz is experimental?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u018054", "pair_id": "u018054-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018054-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1225fd93e3c308cc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018086-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is palletized. Saskia is undeliverable. Jory is not prepaid. Jory is not delayed. Jory is scanned. Saskia is not rerouted. Jory is not undeliverable. Priya is rerouted. Priya is not stamped. Saskia is sealed. Saskia has a waybill. Jory has no locker slot. Priya is sealed. Jory is sealed. Jory is rerouted. Priya is not undeliverable. Priya is not prepaid. Saskia is not scanned. Priya is not scanned. Saskia is not weighed. Priya is weighed. Saskia is not palletized. Jory has a waybill.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has no barcode and additionally has no locker slot, it then is not fragile. #2 Each time a parcel is not undeliverable, it then has no barcode. #3 Each time a parcel is sealed and additionally is not prepaid, it then is registered. #4 Each time a parcel is not fragile and additionally is not delayed and additionally is not prepaid, it then is not refrigerated. #5 Each time a parcel is rerouted and additionally is not scanned, it then is hazardous. #6 Each time a parcel is not fragile and additionally is delayed, it then is refrigerated. #7 Each time a parcel is stamped and additionally has a waybill, it then is fragile. #8 Each time a parcel is not stamped, it then is not registered. #1 is set aside if a parcel is not stamped and additionally is palletized. #6 is set aside if a parcel is prepaid and additionally is not weighed. #3 is set aside if a parcel is stamped. #3 yields to #8. #4 yields to #6. #1 yields to #7. Question: Do the terms above show that Jory is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018086", "pair_id": "u018086-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018086-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1e82112957ee0764", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u018086-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is palletized. Saskia is undeliverable. Jory is not stamped. Jory is not prepaid. Jory is not delayed. Jory is scanned. Saskia is not rerouted. Jory is not undeliverable. Priya is rerouted. Priya is not stamped. Saskia is sealed. Saskia has a waybill. Jory has no locker slot. Priya is sealed. Jory is sealed. Jory is rerouted. Priya is not undeliverable. Priya is not prepaid. Saskia is not scanned. Priya is not scanned. Saskia is not weighed. Priya is weighed. Saskia is not palletized. Jory has a waybill.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has no barcode and additionally has no locker slot, it then is not fragile. #2 Each time a parcel is not undeliverable, it then has no barcode. #3 Each time a parcel is sealed and additionally is not prepaid, it then is registered. #4 Each time a parcel is not fragile and additionally is not delayed and additionally is not prepaid, it then is not refrigerated. #5 Each time a parcel is rerouted and additionally is not scanned, it then is hazardous. #6 Each time a parcel is not fragile and additionally is delayed, it then is refrigerated. #7 Each time a parcel is stamped and additionally has a waybill, it then is fragile. #8 Each time a parcel is not stamped, it then is not registered. #1 is set aside if a parcel is not stamped and additionally is palletized. #6 is set aside if a parcel is prepaid and additionally is not weighed. #3 is set aside if a parcel is stamped. #3 yields to #8. #4 yields to #6. #1 yields to #7. Question: Do the terms above show that Jory is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018086", "pair_id": "u018086-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018086-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "398e6f87ad3eb110", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u018094-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is a veteran. Mads is fingerprinted. Mads is bonded. Mads has a notice period of 35.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is not bonded, it also has no mentor. Clause 2: once any candidate is fingerprinted, it also is not freelance. Clause 3: once any candidate is a veteran, it also is freelance. Clause 4: once any candidate has a notice period over 53, it also has a diploma. Clause 5: once any candidate is fingerprinted, it also has no diploma. Clause 6: once any candidate is fingerprinted, it also is not seasoned. Clause 7: once any candidate has a notice period of 85 or more, it also is seasoned. Clause 6 overrides Clause 7. Clause 4 overrides Clause 5. Clause 2 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Mads has a diploma?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018094", "pair_id": "u018094-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018094-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec65b2f2a533126a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u018094-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is a veteran. Mads is fingerprinted. Mads is bonded. Mads has a notice period of 35.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is bonded, it also has no mentor. Clause 2: once any candidate is fingerprinted, it also is not freelance. Clause 3: once any candidate is a veteran, it also is freelance. Clause 4: once any candidate has a notice period over 53, it also has a diploma. Clause 5: once any candidate is fingerprinted, it also has no diploma. Clause 6: once any candidate is fingerprinted, it also is not seasoned. Clause 7: once any candidate has a notice period of 85 or more, it also is seasoned. Clause 6 overrides Clause 7. Clause 4 overrides Clause 5. Clause 2 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Mads has a diploma?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018094", "pair_id": "u018094-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018094-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c4ea7c14c777297d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u018116-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is symptomatic. Cosima has a pulse rate of 91. Florin has a mobility rank of 85. Florin has a fever reading of 70. Cosima is allergic. Cosima is hypertensive. Cosima has a fever reading of 32. Florin has a pulse rate of 32. Cosima has a mobility rank of 95. Florin is allergic.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is allergic, that patient has a caregiver. Item B. When the patient is not hypertensive, and has a pulse rate of more than 84, that patient is contagious. Item C. When the patient is ambulatory, and has a fever reading of more than 32, and is rescheduled, that patient is not postoperative. Item D. When the patient is rescheduled, and has a mobility rank of no less than 29, and is not symptomatic, that patient is waitlisted. Item E. When the patient has a fever reading of more than 18, and is symptomatic, that patient is rescheduled. Item F. When the patient is allergic, that patient is ambulatory. Item G. When the patient is ambulatory, and has a fever reading of no more than 32, that patient is postoperative. Item F is suspended when the patient is not allergic. Item A is suspended when the patient has a fever reading of no more than 52. Question: Can one infer that Cosima is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018116", "pair_id": "u018116-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018116-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6355514618c8f201", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u018116-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is symptomatic. Cosima has a pulse rate of 91. Florin has a mobility rank of 85. Florin has a fever reading of 70. Cosima is allergic. Cosima is hypertensive. Cosima has a fever reading of 76. Florin has a pulse rate of 32. Cosima has a mobility rank of 95. Florin is allergic.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is allergic, that patient has a caregiver. Item B. When the patient is not hypertensive, and has a pulse rate of more than 84, that patient is contagious. Item C. When the patient is ambulatory, and has a fever reading of more than 32, and is rescheduled, that patient is not postoperative. Item D. When the patient is rescheduled, and has a mobility rank of no less than 29, and is not symptomatic, that patient is waitlisted. Item E. When the patient has a fever reading of more than 18, and is symptomatic, that patient is rescheduled. Item F. When the patient is allergic, that patient is ambulatory. Item G. When the patient is ambulatory, and has a fever reading of no more than 32, that patient is postoperative. Item F is suspended when the patient is not allergic. Item A is suspended when the patient has a fever reading of no more than 52. Question: Can one infer that Cosima is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018116", "pair_id": "u018116-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018116-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "34cf600ce68832eb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u018120-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar has no industry backing. Capella is embargoed. Aldebaran is not embargoed. Aldebaran is not renewed. Aldebaran has a citation index of 17. Capella has a citation index of 56. Aldebaran has no industry backing. Hadar is not renewed. Capella has a patent filing. Aldebaran has no patent filing. Capella is renewed. Hadar has a team size of 46.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a patent filing, so it has a field site. No. 2 While the given proposal has industry backing, so it is budgeted. No. 3 While the given proposal is not renewed, so it has no ethics clearance. No. 4 While the given proposal is not embargoed, so it has no postdoc. No. 5 While the given proposal has a team size not above 54, so it has no field site. No. 6 While the given proposal is not longitudinal, so it is endorsed. No. 7 While the given proposal is budgeted, so it is not longitudinal. No. 8 While the given proposal has a citation index that falls below 72, so it is not interdisciplinary. No. 9 While the given proposal has no patent filing, so it is shortlisted. No. 10 While the given proposal has a field site, so it has ethics clearance. No. 11 While the given proposal has ethics clearance, so it is resubmitted. No. 12 While the given proposal is shortlisted, so it has no seed funding. No. 13 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is not theoretical. No. 14 While the given proposal has no seed funding, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 15 While the given proposal has industry backing, so it is not resubmitted. No. 5 wins over No. 1. No. 14 wins over No. 8. No. 15 wins over No. 11. No. 10 wins over No. 3. Question: Select what holds for Capella: which option?", "options": ["is interdisciplinary", "is resubmitted", "is endorsed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is resubmitted", "unit_id": "u018120", "pair_id": "u018120-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/12", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018120-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7c919570de573742", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018120-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar has no industry backing. Capella is embargoed. Aldebaran is not embargoed. Aldebaran is not renewed. Aldebaran has a citation index of 17. Capella has a citation index of 56. Aldebaran has no industry backing. Hadar is not renewed. Capella has a patent filing. Aldebaran has no patent filing. Capella is renewed. Hadar has a team size of 46. Capella has industry backing.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a patent filing, so it has a field site. No. 2 While the given proposal has industry backing, so it is budgeted. No. 3 While the given proposal is not renewed, so it has no ethics clearance. No. 4 While the given proposal is not embargoed, so it has no postdoc. No. 5 While the given proposal has a team size not above 54, so it has no field site. No. 6 While the given proposal is not longitudinal, so it is endorsed. No. 7 While the given proposal is budgeted, so it is not longitudinal. No. 8 While the given proposal has a citation index that falls below 72, so it is not interdisciplinary. No. 9 While the given proposal has no patent filing, so it is shortlisted. No. 10 While the given proposal has a field site, so it has ethics clearance. No. 11 While the given proposal has ethics clearance, so it is resubmitted. No. 12 While the given proposal is shortlisted, so it has no seed funding. No. 13 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is not theoretical. No. 14 While the given proposal has no seed funding, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 15 While the given proposal has industry backing, so it is not resubmitted. No. 5 wins over No. 1. No. 14 wins over No. 8. No. 15 wins over No. 11. No. 10 wins over No. 3. Question: Select what holds for Capella: which option?", "options": ["is interdisciplinary", "is resubmitted", "is endorsed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u018120", "pair_id": "u018120-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/12", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018120-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8c1a61c5adf62c46", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018160-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Halcyon is patched. Nimbus is deprecated. Halcyon has a dedicated host. Halcyon is encrypted. Orrery is patched. Nimbus is not patched. Orrery has a snapshot. Halcyon is throttled. Halcyon is not mirrored. Tundra is not replicated. Nimbus has no dedicated host. Orrery is mirrored. Halcyon has no GPU. Halcyon is deprecated. Tundra is throttled. Tundra is not mirrored. Halcyon has no public endpoint. Orrery has a GPU.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is throttled and also is patched, it also is virtualized. Clause 2: once any workload is sandboxed and also is deprecated, it also is stateless. Clause 3: once any workload is sandboxed and also is replicated and also is mirrored, it also is isolated. Clause 4: once any workload is sandboxed and also is idle and also is deprecated, it also is provisioned. Clause 5: once any workload is encrypted, it also is sharded. Clause 6: once any workload has a GPU and also is deprecated, it also is autoscaled. Clause 7: once any workload is virtualized, it also is sandboxed. Clause 8: once any workload has a dedicated host, it also is backed up. Clause 9: once any workload is sandboxed and also has a snapshot and also has a public endpoint, it also has a failover node. Clause 2 does not hold for a workload when any workload is idle. Clause 9 does not hold for a workload when any workload is replicated. Clause 6 does not hold for a workload when any workload is replicated. Clause 5 does not hold for a workload when any workload is replicated. Question: Which of these is true of Halcyon?", "options": ["is isolated", "is provisioned", "has a failover node", "is stateless"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is stateless", "unit_id": "u018160", "pair_id": "u018160-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018160-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5dd9221fb47e547c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a11", "a19", "a10"]}, "attempt": 24}}
{"id": "syn-u018160-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Halcyon is patched. Nimbus is deprecated. Halcyon has a dedicated host. Halcyon is encrypted. Orrery is patched. Nimbus is not patched. Orrery has a snapshot. Halcyon is throttled. Halcyon is not mirrored. Halcyon is idle. Tundra is not replicated. Nimbus has no dedicated host. Orrery is mirrored. Halcyon has no GPU. Halcyon is deprecated. Tundra is throttled. Tundra is not mirrored. Halcyon has no public endpoint. Orrery has a GPU.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is throttled and also is patched, it also is virtualized. Clause 2: once any workload is sandboxed and also is deprecated, it also is stateless. Clause 3: once any workload is sandboxed and also is replicated and also is mirrored, it also is isolated. Clause 4: once any workload is sandboxed and also is idle and also is deprecated, it also is provisioned. Clause 5: once any workload is encrypted, it also is sharded. Clause 6: once any workload has a GPU and also is deprecated, it also is autoscaled. Clause 7: once any workload is virtualized, it also is sandboxed. Clause 8: once any workload has a dedicated host, it also is backed up. Clause 9: once any workload is sandboxed and also has a snapshot and also has a public endpoint, it also has a failover node. Clause 2 does not hold for a workload when any workload is idle. Clause 9 does not hold for a workload when any workload is replicated. Clause 6 does not hold for a workload when any workload is replicated. Clause 5 does not hold for a workload when any workload is replicated. Question: Which of these is true of Halcyon?", "options": ["is isolated", "is provisioned", "has a failover node", "is stateless"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is provisioned", "unit_id": "u018160", "pair_id": "u018160-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018160-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1b45cc9db2f3e762", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a11", "a19", "a10"]}, "attempt": 24}}
{"id": "syn-u018160-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Halcyon is patched. Nimbus is deprecated. Halcyon has a dedicated host. Halcyon is encrypted. Orrery is patched. Nimbus is not patched. Orrery has a snapshot. Halcyon is throttled. Halcyon is not mirrored. Tundra is not replicated. Nimbus has no dedicated host. Orrery is mirrored. Halcyon has no GPU. Halcyon is deprecated. Tundra is throttled. Tundra is not mirrored. Halcyon has no public endpoint. Orrery has a GPU.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is throttled, and is patched, that workload is virtualized. Item B. When the workload is sandboxed, and is deprecated, that workload is stateless. Item C. When the workload is sandboxed, and is replicated, and is mirrored, that workload is isolated. Item D. When the workload is sandboxed, and is idle, and is deprecated, that workload is provisioned. Item E. When the workload is encrypted, that workload is sharded. Item F. When the workload has a GPU, and is deprecated, that workload is autoscaled. Item G. When the workload is virtualized, that workload is sandboxed. Item H. When the workload has a dedicated host, that workload is backed up. Item I. When the workload is sandboxed, and has a snapshot, and has a public endpoint, that workload has a failover node. Item B is suspended when the workload is idle. Item I is suspended when the workload is replicated. Item F is suspended when the workload is replicated. Item E is suspended when the workload is replicated. Question: What applies to Halcyon?", "options": ["is isolated", "is provisioned", "has a failover node", "is stateless"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is stateless", "unit_id": "u018160", "pair_id": "u018160-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018160-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5dd9221fb47e547c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a11", "a19", "a10"]}, "attempt": 24}}
{"id": "syn-u018160-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Halcyon is patched. Nimbus is deprecated. Halcyon has a dedicated host. Halcyon is encrypted. Orrery is patched. Nimbus is not patched. Orrery has a snapshot. Halcyon is throttled. Halcyon is not mirrored. Halcyon is idle. Tundra is not replicated. Nimbus has no dedicated host. Orrery is mirrored. Halcyon has no GPU. Halcyon is deprecated. Tundra is throttled. Tundra is not mirrored. Halcyon has no public endpoint. Orrery has a GPU.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is throttled, and is patched, that workload is virtualized. Item B. When the workload is sandboxed, and is deprecated, that workload is stateless. Item C. When the workload is sandboxed, and is replicated, and is mirrored, that workload is isolated. Item D. When the workload is sandboxed, and is idle, and is deprecated, that workload is provisioned. Item E. When the workload is encrypted, that workload is sharded. Item F. When the workload has a GPU, and is deprecated, that workload is autoscaled. Item G. When the workload is virtualized, that workload is sandboxed. Item H. When the workload has a dedicated host, that workload is backed up. Item I. When the workload is sandboxed, and has a snapshot, and has a public endpoint, that workload has a failover node. Item B is suspended when the workload is idle. Item I is suspended when the workload is replicated. Item F is suspended when the workload is replicated. Item E is suspended when the workload is replicated. Question: What applies to Halcyon?", "options": ["is isolated", "is provisioned", "has a failover node", "is stateless"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is provisioned", "unit_id": "u018160", "pair_id": "u018160-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018160-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1b45cc9db2f3e762", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a18", "a11", "a19", "a10"]}, "attempt": 24}}
{"id": "syn-u018194-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is referred. Florin is not diabetic. Florin has a pulse rate of 72.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here has a chaperone, thus it is not pregnant. Provision 2: when the patient here has a mobility rank beneath 35, thus it has a chaperone. Provision 3: when the patient here is diabetic, thus it has a caregiver. Provision 4: when the patient here is diabetic, thus it has no caregiver. Provision 5: when the patient here is not diabetic, thus it has no chaperone. Provision 6: when the patient here is referred, thus it has no pacemaker. Provision 7: when the patient here has no chaperone, thus it is pregnant. Provision 7 has no effect when the patient here is diabetic. Provision 3 has no effect when the patient here is diabetic. Provision 6 has no effect when the patient here is diabetic. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here has a pulse rate at or above 11. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here is not diabetic. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Florin is pregnant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018194", "pair_id": "u018194-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018194-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d249068480e16eef", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018194-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is referred. Florin is not diabetic. Florin has a pulse rate of 72.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here has a chaperone, thus it is not pregnant. Provision 2: when the patient here has a mobility rank beneath 35, thus it has a chaperone. Provision 3: when the patient here is diabetic, thus it has a caregiver. Provision 4: when the patient here is diabetic, thus it has no caregiver. Provision 5: when the patient here is not diabetic, thus it has no chaperone. Provision 6: when the patient here is referred, thus it has no pacemaker. Provision 7: when the patient here has a chaperone, thus it is pregnant. Provision 7 has no effect when the patient here is diabetic. Provision 3 has no effect when the patient here is diabetic. Provision 6 has no effect when the patient here is diabetic. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here has a pulse rate at or above 11. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here is not diabetic. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Florin is pregnant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u018194", "pair_id": "u018194-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018194-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "143e7f033c884623", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018194-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is referred. Florin is not diabetic. Florin has a pulse rate of 72.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient has a chaperone, so it is not pregnant. No. 2 While the given patient has a mobility rank that falls below 35, so it has a chaperone. No. 3 While the given patient is diabetic, so it has a caregiver. No. 4 While the given patient is diabetic, so it has no caregiver. No. 5 While the given patient is not diabetic, so it has no chaperone. No. 6 While the given patient is referred, so it has no pacemaker. No. 7 While the given patient has no chaperone, so it is pregnant. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given patient is diabetic. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given patient is diabetic. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given patient is diabetic. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given patient has a pulse rate not below 11. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given patient is not diabetic. No. 4 wins over No. 3. No. 1 wins over No. 7. No. 5 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Florin is pregnant\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018194", "pair_id": "u018194-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018194-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d249068480e16eef", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018194-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is referred. Florin is not diabetic. Florin has a pulse rate of 72.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient has a chaperone, so it is not pregnant. No. 2 While the given patient has a mobility rank that falls below 35, so it has a chaperone. No. 3 While the given patient is diabetic, so it has a caregiver. No. 4 While the given patient is diabetic, so it has no caregiver. No. 5 While the given patient is not diabetic, so it has no chaperone. No. 6 While the given patient is referred, so it has no pacemaker. No. 7 While the given patient has a chaperone, so it is pregnant. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given patient is diabetic. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given patient is diabetic. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given patient is diabetic. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given patient has a pulse rate not below 11. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given patient is not diabetic. No. 4 wins over No. 3. No. 1 wins over No. 7. No. 5 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Florin is pregnant\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u018194", "pair_id": "u018194-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018194-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "143e7f033c884623", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018201-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf is triaged. Aurel is not bedridden. Aurel is not sedated. Aurel is admitted. Aurel has a mobility rank of 74.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is not admitted and has a mobility rank of at least 71, then it is discharged. (2) If a patient is bedridden, then it is not allergic. (3) If a patient is sedated, then it is referred. (3) is void if the patient is not bedridden. Question: Is it true that Aurel is triaged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u018201", "pair_id": "u018201-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018201-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b63eec5e112adae1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018201-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf is triaged. Aurel is not bedridden. Aurel is not sedated. Aurel is admitted. Aurel is triaged. Aurel has a mobility rank of 74.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is not admitted and has a mobility rank of at least 71, then it is discharged. (2) If a patient is bedridden, then it is not allergic. (3) If a patient is sedated, then it is referred. (3) is void if the patient is not bedridden. Question: Is it true that Aurel is triaged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018201", "pair_id": "u018201-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018201-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "117c0a2aeda800ef", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018201-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf is triaged. Aurel is not bedridden. Aurel is not sedated. Aurel is admitted. Aurel has a mobility rank of 74.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is not admitted, and has a mobility rank of no less than 71, that patient is discharged. Item B. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is not allergic. Item C. When the patient is sedated, that patient is referred. Item C is suspended when the patient is not bedridden. Question: Can one infer that Aurel is triaged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u018201", "pair_id": "u018201-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018201-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b63eec5e112adae1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018201-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf is triaged. Aurel is not bedridden. Aurel is not sedated. Aurel is admitted. Aurel is triaged. Aurel has a mobility rank of 74.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is not admitted, and has a mobility rank of no less than 71, that patient is discharged. Item B. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is not allergic. Item C. When the patient is sedated, that patient is referred. Item C is suspended when the patient is not bedridden. Question: Can one infer that Aurel is triaged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018201", "pair_id": "u018201-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018201-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "117c0a2aeda800ef", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018263-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not rerouted. Kaveh has a delivery window of 0. Quentin is delayed. Liesel is not damaged. Kaveh is damaged. Odile has no barcode. Liesel has a delivery window of 86. Odile has a delivery window of 22. Odile is not rerouted. Kaveh has a barcode. Quentin is not damaged. Liesel is not delayed. Kaveh is delayed. Odile is not damaged.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel has a barcode, it thereby is consolidated. Point B. If said parcel is delayed and further is damaged, it thereby is not consolidated. Point C. If said parcel has a delivery window of maximum 51, it thereby has no courier. Point D. If said parcel has a delivery window in excess of 44, it thereby is not refrigerated. Point E. If said parcel is delayed and further is damaged, it thereby is sealed. Point F. If said parcel is consolidated and further has a delivery window of maximum 40 and further is sealed, it thereby has no waybill. Point G. If said parcel is rerouted and further has a delivery window in excess of 61 and further has a barcode, it thereby is refrigerated. Point H. If said parcel is consolidated and further has a delivery window in excess of 40, it thereby has a waybill. Point A supersedes Point B. Point G supersedes Point D. Point F supersedes Point H. Question: Statement: Kaveh has no waybill. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018263", "pair_id": "u018263-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018263-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "82596aa1722c6e9d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u018263-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not rerouted. Kaveh has a delivery window of 0. Quentin is delayed. Liesel is not damaged. Kaveh is damaged. Odile has no barcode. Liesel has a delivery window of 86. Odile has a delivery window of 22. Odile is not rerouted. Kaveh has a barcode. Quentin is not damaged. Liesel is not delayed. Kaveh is delayed. Odile is not damaged.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel has a barcode, it thereby is consolidated. Point B. If said parcel is delayed and further is damaged, it thereby is not consolidated. Point C. If said parcel has a delivery window in excess of 51, it thereby has no courier. Point D. If said parcel has a delivery window in excess of 44, it thereby is not refrigerated. Point E. If said parcel is delayed and further is damaged, it thereby is sealed. Point F. If said parcel is consolidated and further has a delivery window of maximum 40 and further is sealed, it thereby has no waybill. Point G. If said parcel is rerouted and further has a delivery window in excess of 61 and further has a barcode, it thereby is refrigerated. Point H. If said parcel is consolidated and further has a delivery window in excess of 40, it thereby has a waybill. Point A supersedes Point B. Point G supersedes Point D. Point F supersedes Point H. Question: Statement: Kaveh has no waybill. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018263", "pair_id": "u018263-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018263-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d2d4a34c24ae2522", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u018275-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bruno is inspected. Dmitri has no beneficiary. Xaver is inspected. Agata is inspected. Xaver has a premium band of 32. Dmitri has a premium band of 49. Dmitri is not inspected. Bruno has no beneficiary.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is indemnified provided that it has no beneficiary. Section 2: a policyholder is a smoker provided that it is not inspected. Section 3: a policyholder is a claimant provided that it is not reimbursed. Section 4: a policyholder has roadside assistance provided that it is indemnified. Section 5: a policyholder has no roadside assistance provided that it has a premium band lower than 56. Section 6: a policyholder is not reimbursed provided that it has a premium band of 14 or higher. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it has no beneficiary. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Which statement fits Bruno?", "options": ["is a claimant", "has roadside assistance"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has roadside assistance", "unit_id": "u018275", "pair_id": "u018275-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018275-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c262a165b753e66d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a5", "a3"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u018275-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bruno is inspected. Dmitri has no beneficiary. Bruno has a premium band of 42. Xaver is inspected. Agata is inspected. Xaver has a premium band of 32. Dmitri has a premium band of 49. Dmitri is not inspected. Bruno has no beneficiary.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is indemnified provided that it has no beneficiary. Section 2: a policyholder is a smoker provided that it is not inspected. Section 3: a policyholder is a claimant provided that it is not reimbursed. Section 4: a policyholder has roadside assistance provided that it is indemnified. Section 5: a policyholder has no roadside assistance provided that it has a premium band lower than 56. Section 6: a policyholder is not reimbursed provided that it has a premium band of 14 or higher. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it has no beneficiary. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Which statement fits Bruno?", "options": ["is a claimant", "has roadside assistance"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is a claimant", "unit_id": "u018275", "pair_id": "u018275-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018275-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4953093c8aaaf451", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a5", "a3"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u018276-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xaver has no adjuster. Xaver is not a claimant. Dmitri has a dashcam. Celeste is not retired. Dmitri is not lapsed. Xaver is not retired. Celeste is bundled. Dmitri is not indemnified. Dmitri is not retired. Dmitri is covered. Celeste has a rider. Dmitri is bundled. Celeste is not covered. Xaver has a dashcam. Dmitri has an adjuster. Dmitri is reimbursed. Celeste has an adjuster. Xaver is not covered. Xaver is not indemnified. Dmitri is not a claimant. Dmitri is uninsurable. Dmitri is subrogated. Xaver has no rider. Dmitri is not reinstated. Xaver is not subrogated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is inspected provided that it is reinstated. Section 2: a policyholder has no premium discount provided that it is retired as well as is a claimant as well as is uninsurable. Section 3: a policyholder has no deductible waiver provided that it is lapsed. Section 4: a policyholder is not a smoker provided that it is grandfathered as well as has an adjuster. Section 5: a policyholder is grandfathered provided that it is not a claimant as well as is uninsurable as well as is covered. Section 6: a policyholder is not grandfathered provided that it is a claimant. Section 7: a policyholder is disputed provided that it is not a smoker as well as is bundled as well as is inspected. Section 8: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it is not a smoker as well as is not subrogated as well as is reimbursed. Section 9: a policyholder has roadside assistance provided that it is not a smoker as well as is subrogated as well as is bundled. Section 10: a policyholder is appraised provided that it is a claimant as well as is indemnified as well as has a dashcam. Section 11: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it has a rider as well as is retired. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 11. Question: Which statement fits Dmitri?", "options": ["is disputed", "has roadside assistance", "has flood coverage"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has roadside assistance", "unit_id": "u018276", "pair_id": "u018276-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018276-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "25333dba82b4778b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a6", "a1"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u018276-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xaver has no adjuster. Xaver is not a claimant. Dmitri has a dashcam. Celeste is not retired. Dmitri is lapsed. Xaver is not retired. Celeste is bundled. Dmitri is not indemnified. Dmitri is not retired. Dmitri is covered. Celeste has a rider. Dmitri is bundled. Celeste is not covered. Xaver has a dashcam. Dmitri has an adjuster. Dmitri is reimbursed. Celeste has an adjuster. Xaver is not covered. Xaver is not indemnified. Dmitri is not a claimant. Dmitri is uninsurable. Dmitri is subrogated. Xaver has no rider. Dmitri is not reinstated. Xaver is not subrogated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is inspected provided that it is reinstated. Section 2: a policyholder has no premium discount provided that it is retired as well as is a claimant as well as is uninsurable. Section 3: a policyholder has no deductible waiver provided that it is lapsed. Section 4: a policyholder is not a smoker provided that it is grandfathered as well as has an adjuster. Section 5: a policyholder is grandfathered provided that it is not a claimant as well as is uninsurable as well as is covered. Section 6: a policyholder is not grandfathered provided that it is a claimant. Section 7: a policyholder is disputed provided that it is not a smoker as well as is bundled as well as is inspected. Section 8: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it is not a smoker as well as is not subrogated as well as is reimbursed. Section 9: a policyholder has roadside assistance provided that it is not a smoker as well as is subrogated as well as is bundled. Section 10: a policyholder is appraised provided that it is a claimant as well as is indemnified as well as has a dashcam. Section 11: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it has a rider as well as is retired. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 11. Question: Which statement fits Dmitri?", "options": ["is disputed", "has roadside assistance", "has flood coverage"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has roadside assistance", "unit_id": "u018276", "pair_id": "u018276-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018276-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "be544c646c776b5a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a6", "a1"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u018301-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper is virtualized. Vesper is not encrypted. Vesper is not idle. Zephyr is idle.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is encrypted: then it is isolated. Policy II. Suppose that workload is isolated: then it has a snapshot. Policy III. Suppose that workload is idle: then it is not isolated. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is virtualized: then it is sandboxed. Question: Is it so that Vesper is isolated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u018301", "pair_id": "u018301-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018301-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "c4f906bcdfdbf0e2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018301-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper is virtualized. Vesper is not encrypted. Vesper is idle. Zephyr is idle.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is encrypted: then it is isolated. Policy II. Suppose that workload is isolated: then it has a snapshot. Policy III. Suppose that workload is idle: then it is not isolated. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is virtualized: then it is sandboxed. Question: Is it so that Vesper is isolated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018301", "pair_id": "u018301-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018301-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "1f3467023489cc51", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018329-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is damaged. Thilo is palletized. Ulla is not damaged. Saskia is palletized. Thilo is fragile. Thilo is prepaid. Thilo has a waybill. Ulla has a waybill. Ulla is not prepaid. Nandor is not fragile. Saskia has no waybill. Ulla is fragile.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is not damaged and also is consolidated, it also is not sealed. Clause 2: once any parcel is fragile, it also is not oversized. Clause 3: once any parcel is palletized, it also is oversized. Clause 4: once any parcel is palletized, it also is sealed. Clause 1 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is prepaid. Clause 4 overrides Clause 1. Clause 3 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Thilo has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018329", "pair_id": "u018329-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018329-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1fb454207ced52f7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018329-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is damaged. Thilo is palletized. Ulla is not damaged. Saskia is palletized. Thilo is fragile. Thilo is prepaid. Thilo has no waybill. Ulla has a waybill. Ulla is not prepaid. Nandor is not fragile. Saskia has no waybill. Ulla is fragile.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is not damaged and also is consolidated, it also is not sealed. Clause 2: once any parcel is fragile, it also is not oversized. Clause 3: once any parcel is palletized, it also is oversized. Clause 4: once any parcel is palletized, it also is sealed. Clause 1 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is prepaid. Clause 4 overrides Clause 1. Clause 3 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Thilo has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018329", "pair_id": "u018329-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018329-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "beb7567bb1be9a71", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018329-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is damaged. Thilo is palletized. Ulla is not damaged. Saskia is palletized. Thilo is fragile. Thilo is prepaid. Thilo has a waybill. Ulla has a waybill. Ulla is not prepaid. Nandor is not fragile. Saskia has no waybill. Ulla is fragile.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is not damaged, and is consolidated, that parcel is not sealed. Item B. When the parcel is fragile, that parcel is not oversized. Item C. When the parcel is palletized, that parcel is oversized. Item D. When the parcel is palletized, that parcel is sealed. Item A is suspended when the parcel is prepaid. Item D outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Thilo has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018329", "pair_id": "u018329-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018329-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1fb454207ced52f7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018329-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is damaged. Thilo is palletized. Ulla is not damaged. Saskia is palletized. Thilo is fragile. Thilo is prepaid. Thilo has no waybill. Ulla has a waybill. Ulla is not prepaid. Nandor is not fragile. Saskia has no waybill. Ulla is fragile.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is not damaged, and is consolidated, that parcel is not sealed. Item B. When the parcel is fragile, that parcel is not oversized. Item C. When the parcel is palletized, that parcel is oversized. Item D. When the parcel is palletized, that parcel is sealed. Item A is suspended when the parcel is prepaid. Item D outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Thilo has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018329", "pair_id": "u018329-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018329-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "beb7567bb1be9a71", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018350-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek has no deductible waiver. Celeste has flood coverage. Zdenek is covered. Celeste has a beneficiary. Zdenek has no beneficiary. Celeste is covered. Zdenek is not litigated. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Zdenek is not a smoker. Zdenek is bundled. Edda is a smoker. Zdenek has a premium discount. Xaver is not covered. Zdenek is not grandfathered. Celeste has a premium discount. Edda has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is a claimant provided that it is retired as well as has flood coverage. Section 2: a policyholder is retired provided that it has a premium discount. Section 3: a policyholder is not subrogated provided that it is litigated. Section 4: a policyholder has a rider provided that it is retired as well as has a beneficiary. Section 5: a policyholder is not reimbursed provided that it is uninsurable. Section 6: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it has flood coverage. Section 7: a policyholder is reinstated provided that it is retired as well as is uninsurable. Section 8: a policyholder is subrogated provided that it is retired as well as is bundled as well as is a smoker. Section 9: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it is grandfathered. Section 10: a policyholder is reimbursed provided that it is retired as well as is covered. Section 11: a policyholder has an adjuster provided that it is retired as well as is litigated. Section 12: a policyholder is inspected provided that it is retired as well as has a deductible waiver. Section 13: a policyholder is indemnified provided that it is lapsed. Section 12 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 12. Question: Which statement fits Zdenek?", "options": ["is reinstated", "has an adjuster", "is a claimant", "has a rider", "is inspected", "is reimbursed", "is subrogated"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u018350", "pair_id": "u018350-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/13/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018350-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "30a0a79ebf018cf7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a18", "a3", "a1", "a6", "a10", "a0"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u018350-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek has no deductible waiver. Celeste has flood coverage. Zdenek is covered. Celeste has a beneficiary. Zdenek has no beneficiary. Celeste is covered. Zdenek is not litigated. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Zdenek is not a smoker. Zdenek is bundled. Edda is a smoker. Zdenek has a premium discount. Xaver is not covered. Zdenek is grandfathered. Celeste has a premium discount. Edda has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is a claimant provided that it is retired as well as has flood coverage. Section 2: a policyholder is retired provided that it has a premium discount. Section 3: a policyholder is not subrogated provided that it is litigated. Section 4: a policyholder has a rider provided that it is retired as well as has a beneficiary. Section 5: a policyholder is not reimbursed provided that it is uninsurable. Section 6: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it has flood coverage. Section 7: a policyholder is reinstated provided that it is retired as well as is uninsurable. Section 8: a policyholder is subrogated provided that it is retired as well as is bundled as well as is a smoker. Section 9: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it is grandfathered. Section 10: a policyholder is reimbursed provided that it is retired as well as is covered. Section 11: a policyholder has an adjuster provided that it is retired as well as is litigated. Section 12: a policyholder is inspected provided that it is retired as well as has a deductible waiver. Section 13: a policyholder is indemnified provided that it is lapsed. Section 12 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 12. Question: Which statement fits Zdenek?", "options": ["is reinstated", "has an adjuster", "is a claimant", "has a rider", "is inspected", "is reimbursed", "is subrogated"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u018350", "pair_id": "u018350-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/13/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018350-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e837e67c725a9368", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a18", "a3", "a1", "a6", "a10", "a0"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u018350-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek has no deductible waiver. Celeste has flood coverage. Zdenek is covered. Celeste has a beneficiary. Zdenek has no beneficiary. Celeste is covered. Zdenek is not litigated. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Zdenek is not a smoker. Zdenek is bundled. Edda is a smoker. Zdenek has a premium discount. Xaver is not covered. Zdenek is not grandfathered. Celeste has a premium discount. Edda has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is retired and additionally has flood coverage, it then is a claimant. #2 Each time a policyholder has a premium discount, it then is retired. #3 Each time a policyholder is litigated, it then is not subrogated. #4 Each time a policyholder is retired and additionally has a beneficiary, it then has a rider. #5 Each time a policyholder is uninsurable, it then is not reimbursed. #6 Each time a policyholder has flood coverage, it then is not inspected. #7 Each time a policyholder is retired and additionally is uninsurable, it then is reinstated. #8 Each time a policyholder is retired and additionally is bundled and additionally is a smoker, it then is subrogated. #9 Each time a policyholder is grandfathered, it then is not inspected. #10 Each time a policyholder is retired and additionally is covered, it then is reimbursed. #11 Each time a policyholder is retired and additionally is litigated, it then has an adjuster. #12 Each time a policyholder is retired and additionally has a deductible waiver, it then is inspected. #13 Each time a policyholder is lapsed, it then is indemnified. #9 yields to #12. #8 yields to #3. #10 yields to #5. #12 yields to #6. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Zdenek?", "options": ["is reinstated", "has an adjuster", "is a claimant", "has a rider", "is inspected", "is reimbursed", "is subrogated"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u018350", "pair_id": "u018350-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/13/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018350-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "30a0a79ebf018cf7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a18", "a3", "a1", "a6", "a10", "a0"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u018350-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek has no deductible waiver. Celeste has flood coverage. Zdenek is covered. Celeste has a beneficiary. Zdenek has no beneficiary. Celeste is covered. Zdenek is not litigated. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Zdenek is not a smoker. Zdenek is bundled. Edda is a smoker. Zdenek has a premium discount. Xaver is not covered. Zdenek is grandfathered. Celeste has a premium discount. Edda has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is retired and additionally has flood coverage, it then is a claimant. #2 Each time a policyholder has a premium discount, it then is retired. #3 Each time a policyholder is litigated, it then is not subrogated. #4 Each time a policyholder is retired and additionally has a beneficiary, it then has a rider. #5 Each time a policyholder is uninsurable, it then is not reimbursed. #6 Each time a policyholder has flood coverage, it then is not inspected. #7 Each time a policyholder is retired and additionally is uninsurable, it then is reinstated. #8 Each time a policyholder is retired and additionally is bundled and additionally is a smoker, it then is subrogated. #9 Each time a policyholder is grandfathered, it then is not inspected. #10 Each time a policyholder is retired and additionally is covered, it then is reimbursed. #11 Each time a policyholder is retired and additionally is litigated, it then has an adjuster. #12 Each time a policyholder is retired and additionally has a deductible waiver, it then is inspected. #13 Each time a policyholder is lapsed, it then is indemnified. #9 yields to #12. #8 yields to #3. #10 yields to #5. #12 yields to #6. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Zdenek?", "options": ["is reinstated", "has an adjuster", "is a claimant", "has a rider", "is inspected", "is reimbursed", "is subrogated"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u018350", "pair_id": "u018350-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/13/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018350-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e837e67c725a9368", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a18", "a3", "a1", "a6", "a10", "a0"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u018446-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia has a mobility rank of 22. Florin is bedridden. Xenia is pregnant. Florin has a mobility rank of 16. Florin has an interpreter.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is admitted, thus it is not discharged. Provision 2: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 3: when the patient here is not bedridden, thus it is triaged. Provision 4: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or below 27, thus it has a pacemaker. Provision 5: when the patient here is hypertensive, thus it is admitted. Provision 6: when the patient here is waitlisted, thus it is discharged. Provision 7: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 8: when the patient here has an interpreter, thus it is not admitted. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Would it be right to say that Florin is not discharged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018446", "pair_id": "u018446-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018446-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "879ff884c1c1792c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u018446-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia has a mobility rank of 22. Florin is bedridden. Xenia is pregnant. Florin has a mobility rank of 16. Florin has an interpreter.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is admitted, thus it is not discharged. Provision 2: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 3: when the patient here is bedridden, thus it is triaged. Provision 4: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or below 27, thus it has a pacemaker. Provision 5: when the patient here is hypertensive, thus it is admitted. Provision 6: when the patient here is waitlisted, thus it is discharged. Provision 7: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 8: when the patient here has an interpreter, thus it is not admitted. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Would it be right to say that Florin is not discharged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018446", "pair_id": "u018446-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018446-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "054e8c7319492b1e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u018455-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is not licensed. Mads is seasoned. Mads is probationary. Mads is licensed. Kalle is licensed. Noor is not probationary.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is not licensed, it thereby has a portfolio. Point B. If said candidate is probationary, it thereby has no visa. Point C. If said candidate is probationary, it thereby has a visa. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is not seasoned. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is bonded. Point B is cancelled if said candidate is seasoned. Point B supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Mads has no visa. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018455", "pair_id": "u018455-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018455-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "27949696d2e15044", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u018455-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is not licensed. Mads is seasoned. Mads is not probationary. Mads is licensed. Kalle is licensed. Noor is not probationary.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is not licensed, it thereby has a portfolio. Point B. If said candidate is probationary, it thereby has no visa. Point C. If said candidate is probationary, it thereby has a visa. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is not seasoned. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is bonded. Point B is cancelled if said candidate is seasoned. Point B supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Mads has no visa. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u018455", "pair_id": "u018455-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018455-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6a3ee73b4b58584a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u018455-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is not licensed. Mads is seasoned. Mads is probationary. Mads is licensed. Kalle is licensed. Noor is not probationary.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is not licensed, so it has a portfolio. No. 2 While the given candidate is probationary, so it has no visa. No. 3 While the given candidate is probationary, so it has a visa. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is not seasoned. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is bonded. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is seasoned. No. 2 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Mads has no visa\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018455", "pair_id": "u018455-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018455-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "27949696d2e15044", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u018455-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is not licensed. Mads is seasoned. Mads is not probationary. Mads is licensed. Kalle is licensed. Noor is not probationary.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is not licensed, so it has a portfolio. No. 2 While the given candidate is probationary, so it has no visa. No. 3 While the given candidate is probationary, so it has a visa. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is not seasoned. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is bonded. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is seasoned. No. 2 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Mads has no visa\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u018455", "pair_id": "u018455-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018455-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6a3ee73b4b58584a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u018487-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas has a credit rating of 51. Wiebke has no guarantor. Ingrid is not underwritten. Tomas is not overdrawn. Tomas has a guarantor. Wiebke has a repayment grade of 55. Tomas has a repayment grade of 71. Wiebke has a credit rating of 37. Tomas is not foreclosed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has collateral provided that it is foreclosed. Section 2: a borrower is creditworthy provided that it is pensioned. Section 3: a borrower is pensioned provided that it has a credit rating exceeding 38. Section 4: a borrower is garnished provided that it has a guarantor. Section 5: a borrower is not creditworthy provided that it is pensioned. Section 6: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it is underwritten. Section 5 lapses for a borrower if it has a repayment grade of 61 or lower. Section 2 lapses for a borrower if it has a repayment grade exceeding 61. Section 5 lapses for a borrower if it is overdrawn. Question: Tomas is creditworthy. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018487", "pair_id": "u018487-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018487-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c81af1539a11bf02", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u018487-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas has a credit rating of 51. Wiebke has no guarantor. Ingrid is not underwritten. Tomas is not overdrawn. Tomas has a guarantor. Wiebke has a repayment grade of 55. Tomas has a repayment grade of 71. Wiebke has a credit rating of 28. Tomas is not foreclosed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has collateral provided that it is foreclosed. Section 2: a borrower is creditworthy provided that it is pensioned. Section 3: a borrower is pensioned provided that it has a credit rating exceeding 38. Section 4: a borrower is garnished provided that it has a guarantor. Section 5: a borrower is not creditworthy provided that it is pensioned. Section 6: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it is underwritten. Section 5 lapses for a borrower if it has a repayment grade of 61 or lower. Section 2 lapses for a borrower if it has a repayment grade exceeding 61. Section 5 lapses for a borrower if it is overdrawn. Question: Tomas is creditworthy. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018487", "pair_id": "u018487-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018487-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "99fd83ac8662b5e7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u018492-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is not profiled. Mica is not notarized. Mica is not localized. Mica is not documented. Mica is backported. Mica has a patch cycle of 41. Mica has a defect tally of 94. Mica is not obsolete. Mica is not fuzzed.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is not backported and is notarized and is not profiled, then it is minified. (2) If a build is obsolete, then it is not tagged. (3) If a build is backported and is not notarized, then it is not minified. (4) If a build is not localized and is fuzzed, then it is tested. (5) If a build has a patch cycle of at most 52, then it is linted. (5) is void if the build is not backported. (4) is void if the build has a defect tally below 22. (2) is void if the build is backported. (1) is void if the build is documented and is localized. Question: Is it true that Mica is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018492", "pair_id": "u018492-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018492-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7462ef9909c6f1d3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u018492-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is not profiled. Mica is not notarized. Mica is not localized. Mica is not documented. Mica is backported. Mica has a patch cycle of 41. Mica has a defect tally of 94. Mica is not obsolete. Mica is not fuzzed.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is not backported and is notarized and is not profiled, then it is minified. (2) If a build is obsolete, then it is not tagged. (3) If a build is not backported and is not notarized, then it is not minified. (4) If a build is not localized and is fuzzed, then it is tested. (5) If a build has a patch cycle of at most 52, then it is linted. (5) is void if the build is not backported. (4) is void if the build has a defect tally below 22. (2) is void if the build is backported. (1) is void if the build is documented and is localized. Question: Is it true that Mica is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u018492", "pair_id": "u018492-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018492-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4e02ac6c9c170ac4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u018492-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is not profiled. Mica is not notarized. Mica is not localized. Mica is not documented. Mica is backported. Mica has a patch cycle of 41. Mica has a defect tally of 94. Mica is not obsolete. Mica is not fuzzed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is not backported and also is notarized and also is not profiled, it also is minified. Clause 2: once any build is obsolete, it also is not tagged. Clause 3: once any build is backported and also is not notarized, it also is not minified. Clause 4: once any build is not localized and also is fuzzed, it also is tested. Clause 5: once any build has a patch cycle of 52 or less, it also is linted. Clause 5 does not hold for a build when any build is not backported. Clause 4 does not hold for a build when any build has a defect tally under 22. Clause 2 does not hold for a build when any build is backported. Clause 1 does not hold for a build when any build is documented and also is localized. Question: Does it follow that Mica is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018492", "pair_id": "u018492-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018492-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7462ef9909c6f1d3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u018492-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is not profiled. Mica is not notarized. Mica is not localized. Mica is not documented. Mica is backported. Mica has a patch cycle of 41. Mica has a defect tally of 94. Mica is not obsolete. Mica is not fuzzed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is not backported and also is notarized and also is not profiled, it also is minified. Clause 2: once any build is obsolete, it also is not tagged. Clause 3: once any build is not backported and also is not notarized, it also is not minified. Clause 4: once any build is not localized and also is fuzzed, it also is tested. Clause 5: once any build has a patch cycle of 52 or less, it also is linted. Clause 5 does not hold for a build when any build is not backported. Clause 4 does not hold for a build when any build has a defect tally under 22. Clause 2 does not hold for a build when any build is backported. Clause 1 does not hold for a build when any build is documented and also is localized. Question: Does it follow that Mica is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u018492", "pair_id": "u018492-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018492-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4e02ac6c9c170ac4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u018503-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice has a changelog. Talc has no security advisory. Talc has a changelog. Pumice is not flaky. Mica is versioned. Pumice has no security advisory. Pumice is not compiled. Mica has a security advisory. Talc is versioned. Pumice is not profiled. Pumice has no migration script. Pumice is merged. Talc is merged. Talc is minified. Pumice is versioned. Talc is flaky.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build has a feature toggle provided that it has a changelog as well as is merged as well as is minified. Section 2: a build is localized provided that it is benchmarked as well as is not flaky as well as is not profiled. Section 3: a build is not benchmarked provided that it is not profiled as well as has a security advisory. Section 4: a build has no feature toggle provided that it is not compiled. Section 5: a build is benchmarked provided that it has no migration script. Section 6: a build is not localized provided that it is benchmarked as well as is flaky as well as has no security advisory. Section 2 lapses for a build if it is not versioned as well as is merged. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Pumice is localized. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018503", "pair_id": "u018503-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018503-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cca444e7d623c403", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 17}}
{"id": "syn-u018503-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice has a changelog. Talc has no security advisory. Talc has a changelog. Pumice is not flaky. Mica is versioned. Pumice has no security advisory. Pumice is compiled. Mica has a security advisory. Talc is versioned. Pumice is not profiled. Pumice has no migration script. Pumice is merged. Talc is merged. Talc is minified. Pumice is versioned. Talc is flaky.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build has a feature toggle provided that it has a changelog as well as is merged as well as is minified. Section 2: a build is localized provided that it is benchmarked as well as is not flaky as well as is not profiled. Section 3: a build is not benchmarked provided that it is not profiled as well as has a security advisory. Section 4: a build has no feature toggle provided that it is not compiled. Section 5: a build is benchmarked provided that it has no migration script. Section 6: a build is not localized provided that it is benchmarked as well as is flaky as well as has no security advisory. Section 2 lapses for a build if it is not versioned as well as is merged. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Pumice is localized. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018503", "pair_id": "u018503-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018503-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "eeb99be10afc7759", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 17}}
{"id": "syn-u018548-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Elif is not waitlisted. Elif is not symptomatic. Cosima is not waitlisted. Yusuf is referred. Elif is not referred. Cosima is vaccinated. Elif is vaccinated. Yusuf is symptomatic.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is allergic provided that it is not waitlisted. Section 2: a patient is diabetic provided that it is admitted. Section 3: a patient is admitted provided that it is referred. Section 4: a patient is anemic provided that it is not referred. Section 5: a patient is hypertensive provided that it is symptomatic. Section 6: a patient is postoperative provided that it is anemic. Section 7: a patient is rescheduled provided that it is not referred. Section 5 lapses for a patient if it is not referred. Section 1 lapses for a patient if it is vaccinated. Question: Which statement fits Elif?", "options": ["is diabetic", "is postoperative"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is postoperative", "unit_id": "u018548", "pair_id": "u018548-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018548-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3b048949410facc8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a3"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u018548-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Elif is not waitlisted. Elif is not symptomatic. Cosima is not waitlisted. Yusuf is referred. Elif is referred. Cosima is vaccinated. Elif is vaccinated. Yusuf is symptomatic.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is allergic provided that it is not waitlisted. Section 2: a patient is diabetic provided that it is admitted. Section 3: a patient is admitted provided that it is referred. Section 4: a patient is anemic provided that it is not referred. Section 5: a patient is hypertensive provided that it is symptomatic. Section 6: a patient is postoperative provided that it is anemic. Section 7: a patient is rescheduled provided that it is not referred. Section 5 lapses for a patient if it is not referred. Section 1 lapses for a patient if it is vaccinated. Question: Which statement fits Elif?", "options": ["is diabetic", "is postoperative"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is diabetic", "unit_id": "u018548", "pair_id": "u018548-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018548-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cd2c3660dc76bda1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a3"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u018548-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Elif is not waitlisted. Elif is not symptomatic. Cosima is not waitlisted. Yusuf is referred. Elif is not referred. Cosima is vaccinated. Elif is vaccinated. Yusuf is symptomatic.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is not waitlisted: then it is allergic. Policy II. Suppose that patient is admitted: then it is diabetic. Policy III. Suppose that patient is referred: then it is admitted. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is not referred: then it is anemic. Policy V. Suppose that patient is symptomatic: then it is hypertensive. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is anemic: then it is postoperative. Policy VII. Suppose that patient is not referred: then it is rescheduled. Policy V is waived if that patient is not referred. Policy I is waived if that patient is vaccinated. Question: Which choice is right for Elif?", "options": ["is diabetic", "is postoperative"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is postoperative", "unit_id": "u018548", "pair_id": "u018548-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018548-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3b048949410facc8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a3"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u018548-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Elif is not waitlisted. Elif is not symptomatic. Cosima is not waitlisted. Yusuf is referred. Elif is referred. Cosima is vaccinated. Elif is vaccinated. Yusuf is symptomatic.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is not waitlisted: then it is allergic. Policy II. Suppose that patient is admitted: then it is diabetic. Policy III. Suppose that patient is referred: then it is admitted. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is not referred: then it is anemic. Policy V. Suppose that patient is symptomatic: then it is hypertensive. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is anemic: then it is postoperative. Policy VII. Suppose that patient is not referred: then it is rescheduled. Policy V is waived if that patient is not referred. Policy I is waived if that patient is vaccinated. Question: Which choice is right for Elif?", "options": ["is diabetic", "is postoperative"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is diabetic", "unit_id": "u018548", "pair_id": "u018548-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018548-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cd2c3660dc76bda1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a3"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u018599-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is collaborative. Electra is not cofunded.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is collaborative, thus it is interdisciplinary. Provision 2: when the proposal here is cofunded, thus it has a patent filing. Provision 3: when the proposal here has a field site, thus it is renewed. Provision 4: when the proposal here is renewed, thus it is embargoed. Provision 5: when the proposal here has industry backing, thus it is budgeted. Provision 6: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is not budgeted. Provision 7: when the proposal here is interdisciplinary, thus it has a steering committee. Provision 8: when the proposal here is interdisciplinary, thus it has industry backing. Question: Would it be right to say that Electra is budgeted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018599", "pair_id": "u018599-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018599-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "ee9116e790851129", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u018599-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is collaborative. Electra is cofunded.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is collaborative, thus it is interdisciplinary. Provision 2: when the proposal here is cofunded, thus it has a patent filing. Provision 3: when the proposal here has a field site, thus it is renewed. Provision 4: when the proposal here is renewed, thus it is embargoed. Provision 5: when the proposal here has industry backing, thus it is budgeted. Provision 6: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is not budgeted. Provision 7: when the proposal here is interdisciplinary, thus it has a steering committee. Provision 8: when the proposal here is interdisciplinary, thus it has industry backing. Question: Would it be right to say that Electra is budgeted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018599", "pair_id": "u018599-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u018599-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "ae07198281c194fd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u018606-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jasna is a graduate. Jasna has a commute radius of 51. Olek is not headhunted. Jasna is not headhunted. Olek is freelance. Jasna is bilingual. Olek has a seniority step of 22. Jasna has a seniority step of 5. Jasna is interviewed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is not headhunted, thus it is fingerprinted. Provision 2: when the candidate here is fingerprinted, thus it is unionized. Provision 3: when the candidate here is not bilingual, thus it is onboarded. Provision 4: when the candidate here has a signing bonus, thus it has a background screening. Provision 5: when the candidate here has no background screening, thus it has a visa. Provision 6: when the candidate here is unionized, thus it is seasoned. Provision 7: when the candidate here is not freelance, thus it has a signing bonus. Provision 8: when the candidate here is certified, thus it has no background screening. Provision 9: when the candidate here has a commute radius at or below 24, thus it is not unionized. Provision 10: when the candidate here has a seniority step beyond 28, thus it is not certified. Provision 11: when the candidate here is not interviewed, thus it is not fingerprinted. Provision 12: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is certified. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is not a graduate. Provision 11 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 12. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Which one describes Jasna?", "options": ["has a visa", "is seasoned"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is seasoned", "unit_id": "u018606", "pair_id": "u018606-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018606-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b2035566cadac8bc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u018606-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jasna is a graduate. Jasna has a commute radius of 51. Olek is not headhunted. Jasna is headhunted. Olek is freelance. Jasna is bilingual. Olek has a seniority step of 22. Jasna has a seniority step of 5. Jasna is interviewed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is not headhunted, thus it is fingerprinted. Provision 2: when the candidate here is fingerprinted, thus it is unionized. Provision 3: when the candidate here is not bilingual, thus it is onboarded. Provision 4: when the candidate here has a signing bonus, thus it has a background screening. Provision 5: when the candidate here has no background screening, thus it has a visa. Provision 6: when the candidate here is unionized, thus it is seasoned. Provision 7: when the candidate here is not freelance, thus it has a signing bonus. Provision 8: when the candidate here is certified, thus it has no background screening. Provision 9: when the candidate here has a commute radius at or below 24, thus it is not unionized. Provision 10: when the candidate here has a seniority step beyond 28, thus it is not certified. Provision 11: when the candidate here is not interviewed, thus it is not fingerprinted. Provision 12: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is certified. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is not a graduate. Provision 11 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 12. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Which one describes Jasna?", "options": ["has a visa", "is seasoned"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a visa", "unit_id": "u018606", "pair_id": "u018606-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018606-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "887aa96b86a2740a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u018625-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is backed up. Sierra is sharded. Tundra is patched. Tundra is sharded. Tundra is not replicated. Tundra is cached. Sierra is not encrypted. Tundra is not backed up. Tundra is virtualized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is patched and further is cached, it thereby is stateless. Point B. If said workload has a snapshot and further is backed up, it thereby has a GPU. Point C. If said workload is stateless and further is cached and further is patched, it thereby is sandboxed. Point D. If said workload is cached, it thereby is not containerized. Point E. If said workload is sandboxed and further is replicated, it thereby has a firewall. Point F. If said workload is sandboxed and further is encrypted and further is backed up, it thereby has a failover node. Point G. If said workload is sandboxed and further is virtualized and further is sharded, it thereby has no failover node. Question: Statement: Tundra has a failover node. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018625", "pair_id": "u018625-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018625-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "c5ab3453aaf1760f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a13", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u018625-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is backed up. Sierra is sharded. Tundra is not patched. Tundra is sharded. Tundra is not replicated. Tundra is cached. Sierra is not encrypted. Tundra is not backed up. Tundra is virtualized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is patched and further is cached, it thereby is stateless. Point B. If said workload has a snapshot and further is backed up, it thereby has a GPU. Point C. If said workload is stateless and further is cached and further is patched, it thereby is sandboxed. Point D. If said workload is cached, it thereby is not containerized. Point E. If said workload is sandboxed and further is replicated, it thereby has a firewall. Point F. If said workload is sandboxed and further is encrypted and further is backed up, it thereby has a failover node. Point G. If said workload is sandboxed and further is virtualized and further is sharded, it thereby has no failover node. Question: Statement: Tundra has a failover node. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u018625", "pair_id": "u018625-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018625-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "97d928133ada4d82", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a13", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u018628-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not bundled. Celeste is not lapsed. Dmitri is bundled. Dmitri is not a claimant. Viggo is covered. Dmitri is not lapsed. Viggo is not a claimant. Celeste has roadside assistance. Viggo is not lapsed. Celeste is not covered. Celeste is not appraised. Celeste is grandfathered. Celeste is a claimant.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is not covered, it thereby has a premium discount. Point B. If said policyholder is appraised, it thereby has a rider. Point C. If said policyholder is a claimant, it thereby has a deductible waiver. Point D. If said policyholder is not covered, it thereby has no premium discount. Point E. If said policyholder has roadside assistance, it thereby has no dashcam. Point F. If said policyholder is bundled, it thereby has no rider. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder is covered. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is lapsed. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder is not grandfathered. Point B is cancelled if said policyholder is not lapsed. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder is bundled. Point C is cancelled if said policyholder is not lapsed. Point F supersedes Point B. Point D supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Celeste has no premium discount. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018628", "pair_id": "u018628-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018628-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "62b340ca173ffb09", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u018628-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste is not bundled. Celeste is not lapsed. Dmitri is bundled. Dmitri is not a claimant. Viggo is covered. Dmitri is not lapsed. Viggo is not a claimant. Celeste has roadside assistance. Viggo is not lapsed. Celeste is not covered. Celeste is not appraised. Celeste is grandfathered. Celeste is a claimant.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is not covered, it thereby has a premium discount. Point B. If said policyholder is appraised, it thereby has a rider. Point C. If said policyholder is a claimant, it thereby has a deductible waiver. Point D. If said policyholder is not covered, it thereby has no premium discount. Point E. If said policyholder has roadside assistance, it thereby has no dashcam. Point F. If said policyholder is bundled, it thereby has no rider. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder is covered. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is lapsed. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is grandfathered. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder is not grandfathered. Point B is cancelled if said policyholder is not lapsed. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder is bundled. Point C is cancelled if said policyholder is not lapsed. Point F supersedes Point B. Point D supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Celeste has no premium discount. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018628", "pair_id": "u018628-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018628-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cd498ac0d4aa66af", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u018821-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke has no collateral. Evren has collateral. Wiebke is not garnished. Wiebke is pensioned. Folke is audited. Evren is pensioned. Folke is not pensioned. Hamid has collateral.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is pensioned while is garnished, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 1 has no effect when the borrower here is audited. Question: Would it be right to say that Evren has collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u018821", "pair_id": "u018821-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018821-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "343bdbbd3015385f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018821-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke has no collateral. Evren has no collateral. Wiebke is not garnished. Wiebke is pensioned. Folke is audited. Evren is pensioned. Folke is not pensioned. Hamid has collateral.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is pensioned while is garnished, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 1 has no effect when the borrower here is audited. Question: Would it be right to say that Evren has collateral?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018821", "pair_id": "u018821-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018821-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "15fe122dbdfee2aa", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018882-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not bedridden. Zora has a chaperone. Wendel has no interpreter. Wendel is fasting. Wendel is bedridden. Cosima is not allergic. Cosima is fasting. Zora is not allergic. Zora is fasting. Zora is not ambulatory. Wendel is not admitted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has an interpreter plus is fasting: then it is vaccinated. Policy II. Suppose that patient is admitted: then it is not vaccinated. Policy III. Suppose that patient has a chaperone plus is bedridden plus is rescheduled: then it is not postoperative. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a chaperone plus is fasting plus is admitted: then it is postoperative. Policy IV is waived if that patient is bedridden plus is allergic. Policy III is waived if that patient is ambulatory. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Zora is not postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u018882", "pair_id": "u018882-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018882-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9f273bb5f438f785", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018882-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not bedridden. Zora has a chaperone. Zora is admitted. Wendel has no interpreter. Wendel is fasting. Wendel is bedridden. Cosima is not allergic. Cosima is fasting. Zora is not allergic. Zora is fasting. Zora is not ambulatory. Wendel is not admitted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has an interpreter plus is fasting: then it is vaccinated. Policy II. Suppose that patient is admitted: then it is not vaccinated. Policy III. Suppose that patient has a chaperone plus is bedridden plus is rescheduled: then it is not postoperative. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a chaperone plus is fasting plus is admitted: then it is postoperative. Policy IV is waived if that patient is bedridden plus is allergic. Policy III is waived if that patient is ambulatory. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Zora is not postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018882", "pair_id": "u018882-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018882-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3286c01d22d4ba13", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018882-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not bedridden. Zora has a chaperone. Wendel has no interpreter. Wendel is fasting. Wendel is bedridden. Cosima is not allergic. Cosima is fasting. Zora is not allergic. Zora is fasting. Zora is not ambulatory. Wendel is not admitted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has an interpreter and additionally is fasting, it then is vaccinated. #2 Each time a patient is admitted, it then is not vaccinated. #3 Each time a patient has a chaperone and additionally is bedridden and additionally is rescheduled, it then is not postoperative. #4 Each time a patient has a chaperone and additionally is fasting and additionally is admitted, it then is postoperative. #4 is set aside if a patient is bedridden and additionally is allergic. #3 is set aside if a patient is ambulatory. #3 yields to #4. #1 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Zora is not postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u018882", "pair_id": "u018882-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018882-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9f273bb5f438f785", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u018882-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not bedridden. Zora has a chaperone. Zora is admitted. Wendel has no interpreter. Wendel is fasting. Wendel is bedridden. Cosima is not allergic. Cosima is fasting. Zora is not allergic. Zora is fasting. Zora is not ambulatory. Wendel is not admitted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has an interpreter and additionally is fasting, it then is vaccinated. #2 Each time a patient is admitted, it then is not vaccinated. #3 Each time a patient has a chaperone and additionally is bedridden and additionally is rescheduled, it then is not postoperative. #4 Each time a patient has a chaperone and additionally is fasting and additionally is admitted, it then is postoperative. #4 is set aside if a patient is bedridden and additionally is allergic. #3 is set aside if a patient is ambulatory. #3 yields to #4. #1 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Zora is not postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u018882", "pair_id": "u018882-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u018882-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3286c01d22d4ba13", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019010-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist has a migration script. Obsidian is localized. Gneiss has a migration script. Mica is localized. Mica has no migration script. Gneiss has a security advisory.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is notarized, then it is not reproducible. (2) If a build is not localized, then it is versioned. (3) If a build has a migration script, then it is tested. (4) If a build is versioned, then it is notarized. (5) If a build has a security advisory, then it is flaky. (6) If a build has a migration script, then it is profiled. (7) If a build is flaky, then it is not notarized. Question: Is it true that Mica is notarized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019010", "pair_id": "u019010-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019010-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "83b83f7d57fb2023", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019010-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist has a migration script. Obsidian is localized. Gneiss has a migration script. Mica is localized. Mica has no migration script. Gneiss has a security advisory.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is notarized, then it is not reproducible. (2) If a build is localized, then it is versioned. (3) If a build has a migration script, then it is tested. (4) If a build is versioned, then it is notarized. (5) If a build has a security advisory, then it is flaky. (6) If a build has a migration script, then it is profiled. (7) If a build is flaky, then it is not notarized. Question: Is it true that Mica is notarized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019010", "pair_id": "u019010-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019010-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "3c039866298f6e7d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019017-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is not bundled. Una has an adjuster.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is covered: then it is inspected. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is bundled: then it has no flood coverage. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is covered: then it has flood coverage. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster: then it is not inspected. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is retired: then it is lapsed. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed: then it is grandfathered. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder is not bundled: then it is not reinstated. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder is inspected: then it is not grandfathered. Policy IX. Suppose that policyholder is inspected: then it is not subrogated. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy II. Question: Is it so that Una is grandfathered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019017", "pair_id": "u019017-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019017-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9ed69cf536a818d5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019017-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is not bundled. Una has an adjuster.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is covered: then it is inspected. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is bundled: then it has no flood coverage. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is covered: then it has flood coverage. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster: then it is not inspected. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is retired: then it is lapsed. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed: then it is grandfathered. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder is bundled: then it is not reinstated. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder is inspected: then it is not grandfathered. Policy IX. Suppose that policyholder is inspected: then it is not subrogated. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy II. Question: Is it so that Una is grandfathered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019017", "pair_id": "u019017-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019017-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "0461f63337b38ef3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019017-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is not bundled. Una has an adjuster.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is covered, it then is inspected. #2 Each time a policyholder is bundled, it then has no flood coverage. #3 Each time a policyholder is covered, it then has flood coverage. #4 Each time a policyholder has an adjuster, it then is not inspected. #5 Each time a policyholder is retired, it then is lapsed. #6 Each time a policyholder is lapsed, it then is grandfathered. #7 Each time a policyholder is not bundled, it then is not reinstated. #8 Each time a policyholder is inspected, it then is not grandfathered. #9 Each time a policyholder is inspected, it then is not subrogated. #6 yields to #8. #4 yields to #1. #2 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Una is grandfathered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019017", "pair_id": "u019017-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019017-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9ed69cf536a818d5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019017-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is not bundled. Una has an adjuster.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is covered, it then is inspected. #2 Each time a policyholder is bundled, it then has no flood coverage. #3 Each time a policyholder is covered, it then has flood coverage. #4 Each time a policyholder has an adjuster, it then is not inspected. #5 Each time a policyholder is retired, it then is lapsed. #6 Each time a policyholder is lapsed, it then is grandfathered. #7 Each time a policyholder is bundled, it then is not reinstated. #8 Each time a policyholder is inspected, it then is not grandfathered. #9 Each time a policyholder is inspected, it then is not subrogated. #6 yields to #8. #4 yields to #1. #2 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Una is grandfathered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019017", "pair_id": "u019017-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019017-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "0461f63337b38ef3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019035-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is not stamped. Nandor has a courier. Nandor is not delayed. Jory is stamped. Jory has a courier. Jory is delayed. Ulla is delayed. Jory is not refrigerated. Nandor is scanned. Jory is not scanned. Nandor is weighed. Jory is undeliverable. Ulla is not scanned. Jory has no barcode. Jory is fragile. Jory is not misrouted. Ulla has no courier. Ulla is damaged. Jory is prepaid. Nandor has a barcode.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is stamped and further is delayed, it thereby is tracked. Point B. If said parcel is stamped and further has a barcode, it thereby is hazardous. Point C. If said parcel is stamped and further is refrigerated, it thereby is rerouted. Point D. If said parcel is stamped and further has a courier and further is damaged, it thereby is registered. Point E. If said parcel is stamped and further is not prepaid and further is not undeliverable, it thereby is perishable. Point F. If said parcel is stamped and further is not delayed and further is fragile, it thereby is consolidated. Point G. If said parcel is stamped and further has no courier, it thereby is sealed. Point H. If said parcel is stamped and further has no barcode and further is not undeliverable, it thereby has a waybill. Point I. If said parcel is not misrouted and further is not weighed and further is scanned, it thereby has no locker slot. Point J. If said parcel is not weighed, it thereby is not consolidated. Point H is cancelled if said parcel has a courier. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is not prepaid. Point J supersedes Point F. Question: Which choice is true for Jory?", "options": ["is consolidated", "is perishable", "is tracked", "has a waybill", "is hazardous", "is sealed", "is rerouted", "is registered"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u019035", "pair_id": "u019035-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019035-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3922b868ab780f11", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a17", "a9", "a19", "a5", "a1", "a2", "a18", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u019035-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is not stamped. Nandor has a courier. Nandor is not delayed. Jory is stamped. Jory has a courier. Jory is not delayed. Ulla is delayed. Jory is not refrigerated. Nandor is scanned. Jory is not scanned. Nandor is weighed. Jory is undeliverable. Ulla is not scanned. Jory has no barcode. Jory is fragile. Jory is not misrouted. Ulla has no courier. Ulla is damaged. Jory is prepaid. Nandor has a barcode.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is stamped and further is delayed, it thereby is tracked. Point B. If said parcel is stamped and further has a barcode, it thereby is hazardous. Point C. If said parcel is stamped and further is refrigerated, it thereby is rerouted. Point D. If said parcel is stamped and further has a courier and further is damaged, it thereby is registered. Point E. If said parcel is stamped and further is not prepaid and further is not undeliverable, it thereby is perishable. Point F. If said parcel is stamped and further is not delayed and further is fragile, it thereby is consolidated. Point G. If said parcel is stamped and further has no courier, it thereby is sealed. Point H. If said parcel is stamped and further has no barcode and further is not undeliverable, it thereby has a waybill. Point I. If said parcel is not misrouted and further is not weighed and further is scanned, it thereby has no locker slot. Point J. If said parcel is not weighed, it thereby is not consolidated. Point H is cancelled if said parcel has a courier. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is not prepaid. Point J supersedes Point F. Question: Which choice is true for Jory?", "options": ["is consolidated", "is perishable", "is tracked", "has a waybill", "is hazardous", "is sealed", "is rerouted", "is registered"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is consolidated", "unit_id": "u019035", "pair_id": "u019035-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019035-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "78f99b7df0b6308c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a17", "a9", "a19", "a5", "a1", "a2", "a18", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u019051-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata has roadside assistance. Yara has no roadside assistance. Yara has no flood coverage. Yara is appraised.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it is reinstated. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it is not reinstated. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has roadside assistance: then it is a claimant. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is disputed: then it is not litigated. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is appraised: then it is not a claimant. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder has flood coverage: then it is litigated. Policy I is waived if that policyholder has roadside assistance. Policy II is waived if that policyholder has roadside assistance. Policy II is waived if that policyholder is appraised. Policy V is waived if that policyholder has roadside assistance. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Yara is reinstated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019051", "pair_id": "u019051-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019051-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1472264634e5fdd1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019051-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata has roadside assistance. Yara has no roadside assistance. Yara is indemnified. Yara has no flood coverage. Yara is appraised.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it is reinstated. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it is not reinstated. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has roadside assistance: then it is a claimant. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is disputed: then it is not litigated. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is appraised: then it is not a claimant. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder has flood coverage: then it is litigated. Policy I is waived if that policyholder has roadside assistance. Policy II is waived if that policyholder has roadside assistance. Policy II is waived if that policyholder is appraised. Policy V is waived if that policyholder has roadside assistance. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Yara is reinstated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019051", "pair_id": "u019051-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019051-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "040a2050e9c1923e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019051-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata has roadside assistance. Yara has no roadside assistance. Yara has no flood coverage. Yara is appraised.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is indemnified, it then is reinstated. #2 Each time a policyholder is indemnified, it then is not reinstated. #3 Each time a policyholder has roadside assistance, it then is a claimant. #4 Each time a policyholder is disputed, it then is not litigated. #5 Each time a policyholder is appraised, it then is not a claimant. #6 Each time a policyholder has flood coverage, it then is litigated. #1 is set aside if a policyholder has roadside assistance. #2 is set aside if a policyholder has roadside assistance. #2 is set aside if a policyholder is appraised. #5 is set aside if a policyholder has roadside assistance. #1 yields to #2. #4 yields to #6. #3 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Yara is reinstated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019051", "pair_id": "u019051-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019051-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1472264634e5fdd1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019051-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata has roadside assistance. Yara has no roadside assistance. Yara is indemnified. Yara has no flood coverage. Yara is appraised.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is indemnified, it then is reinstated. #2 Each time a policyholder is indemnified, it then is not reinstated. #3 Each time a policyholder has roadside assistance, it then is a claimant. #4 Each time a policyholder is disputed, it then is not litigated. #5 Each time a policyholder is appraised, it then is not a claimant. #6 Each time a policyholder has flood coverage, it then is litigated. #1 is set aside if a policyholder has roadside assistance. #2 is set aside if a policyholder has roadside assistance. #2 is set aside if a policyholder is appraised. #5 is set aside if a policyholder has roadside assistance. #1 yields to #2. #4 yields to #6. #3 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Yara is reinstated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019051", "pair_id": "u019051-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019051-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "040a2050e9c1923e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019082-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not labeled. Odile has a delivery window of 67. Priya has a delivery window of 93. Priya is hazardous. Saskia is hazardous. Priya is not labeled.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is labeled, so it is misrouted. No. 2 While the given parcel is hazardous, so it is stamped. No. 3 While the given parcel is tracked, so it has a locker slot. No. 4 While the given parcel has a waybill, so it is not sealed. No. 5 While the given parcel has a locker slot, so it is not registered. No. 6 While the given parcel has a delivery window not above 89, so it is tracked. No. 7 While the given parcel is not labeled, so it has a waybill. No. 8 While the given parcel is not sealed, so it is registered. No. 9 While the given parcel has a delivery window not below 42, so it is not palletized. Question: Is the claim \"Priya is registered\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019082", "pair_id": "u019082-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019082-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e956751b261be21b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u019082-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not labeled. Odile has a delivery window of 67. Priya has a delivery window of 93. Priya is hazardous. Saskia is hazardous. Priya is labeled.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is labeled, so it is misrouted. No. 2 While the given parcel is hazardous, so it is stamped. No. 3 While the given parcel is tracked, so it has a locker slot. No. 4 While the given parcel has a waybill, so it is not sealed. No. 5 While the given parcel has a locker slot, so it is not registered. No. 6 While the given parcel has a delivery window not above 89, so it is tracked. No. 7 While the given parcel is not labeled, so it has a waybill. No. 8 While the given parcel is not sealed, so it is registered. No. 9 While the given parcel has a delivery window not below 42, so it is not palletized. Question: Is the claim \"Priya is registered\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019082", "pair_id": "u019082-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019082-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "55dd9a18a3ec95f8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u019127-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo has a rider. Viggo is uninsurable. Yara has a rider. Xaver is subrogated. Agata has no rider. Agata has no flood coverage. Yara has no flood coverage. Viggo is not subrogated. Xaver has a rider. Viggo is not appraised. Agata is not subrogated. Yara is not uninsurable. Viggo has no flood coverage. Xaver is not uninsurable. Yara is appraised. Agata is appraised. Yara is indemnified. Agata is not bundled. Viggo is not indemnified.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it is not subrogated as well as is uninsurable. Section 2: a policyholder is reimbursed provided that it has a dashcam as well as is not indemnified as well as has a deductible waiver. Section 3: a policyholder is disputed provided that it has a dashcam as well as is indemnified as well as is uninsurable. Section 4: a policyholder has no adjuster provided that it is not bundled as well as is appraised. Section 5: a policyholder has a dashcam provided that it has no flood coverage as well as has a rider. Question: Which statement fits Viggo?", "options": ["is reimbursed", "is disputed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u019127", "pair_id": "u019127-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019127-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "dbd0420706bac041", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019127-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo has a rider. Viggo is uninsurable. Yara has a rider. Xaver is subrogated. Agata has no rider. Agata has no flood coverage. Yara has no flood coverage. Viggo is not subrogated. Xaver has a rider. Viggo is appraised. Agata is not subrogated. Yara is not uninsurable. Viggo has no flood coverage. Xaver is not uninsurable. Yara is appraised. Agata is appraised. Yara is indemnified. Agata is not bundled. Viggo is not indemnified.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it is not subrogated as well as is uninsurable. Section 2: a policyholder is reimbursed provided that it has a dashcam as well as is not indemnified as well as has a deductible waiver. Section 3: a policyholder is disputed provided that it has a dashcam as well as is indemnified as well as is uninsurable. Section 4: a policyholder has no adjuster provided that it is not bundled as well as is appraised. Section 5: a policyholder has a dashcam provided that it has no flood coverage as well as has a rider. Question: Which statement fits Viggo?", "options": ["is reimbursed", "is disputed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u019127", "pair_id": "u019127-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019127-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "69d4655c215c3e6d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019130-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist is reverted. Schist is tested. Shale is experimental. Shale is documented. Schist is fuzzed. Schist is linted. Shale is fuzzed. Schist is not documented. Schist is not experimental. Schist is not backported.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is tested, it then is flaky. #2 Each time a build is backported, it then is versioned. #3 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is localized and additionally is compiled, it then is obsolete. #4 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is fuzzed, it then is benchmarked. #5 Each time a build is fuzzed, it then is not flaky. #6 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is documented and additionally is tested, it then has a security advisory. #7 Each time a build is reverted, it then is profiled. #8 Each time a build is profiled and additionally has a changelog, it then is merged. #9 Each time a build is profiled and additionally has no changelog and additionally is not experimental, it then has a feature toggle. #6 is set aside if a build is not linted. #3 is set aside if a build is documented. #1 yields to #5. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Schist?", "options": ["has a security advisory", "is obsolete", "is benchmarked", "is merged", "is flaky", "has a feature toggle"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is benchmarked", "unit_id": "u019130", "pair_id": "u019130-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019130-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "54012389b773a716", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a17", "a7", "a12", "a4", "a16", "a14"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u019130-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist is reverted. Schist is tested. Shale is experimental. Shale is documented. Schist is not fuzzed. Schist is linted. Shale is fuzzed. Schist is not documented. Schist is not experimental. Schist is not backported.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is tested, it then is flaky. #2 Each time a build is backported, it then is versioned. #3 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is localized and additionally is compiled, it then is obsolete. #4 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is fuzzed, it then is benchmarked. #5 Each time a build is fuzzed, it then is not flaky. #6 Each time a build is profiled and additionally is documented and additionally is tested, it then has a security advisory. #7 Each time a build is reverted, it then is profiled. #8 Each time a build is profiled and additionally has a changelog, it then is merged. #9 Each time a build is profiled and additionally has no changelog and additionally is not experimental, it then has a feature toggle. #6 is set aside if a build is not linted. #3 is set aside if a build is documented. #1 yields to #5. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Schist?", "options": ["has a security advisory", "is obsolete", "is benchmarked", "is merged", "is flaky", "has a feature toggle"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is flaky", "unit_id": "u019130", "pair_id": "u019130-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019130-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ddfc0d98c5a3c540", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a17", "a7", "a12", "a4", "a16", "a14"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u019131-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not exploratory. Mirach is not exploratory. Kochab is a pilot study. Kochab is theoretical. Mirach is not a pilot study.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is shortlisted, that proposal is multicenter. Item B. When the proposal is a pilot study, that proposal has a field site. Item C. When the proposal is theoretical, that proposal is not shortlisted. Item D. When the proposal is exploratory, that proposal is shortlisted. Question: Can one infer that Mirach is shortlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019131", "pair_id": "u019131-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019131-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "469eb90d198de1bb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019131-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not exploratory. Mirach is not exploratory. Kochab is a pilot study. Kochab is theoretical. Mirach is a pilot study.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is shortlisted, that proposal is multicenter. Item B. When the proposal is a pilot study, that proposal has a field site. Item C. When the proposal is theoretical, that proposal is not shortlisted. Item D. When the proposal is exploratory, that proposal is shortlisted. Question: Can one infer that Mirach is shortlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019131", "pair_id": "u019131-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019131-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "c0b0ab7c244aede0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019134-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz has a security advisory. Quartz is linted. Schist is not reverted. Mica is backported. Schist is not tested. Mica is experimental. Schist is not signed. Gneiss has no changelog. Gneiss is signed. Mica is merged. Quartz has a changelog. Quartz is not signed. Schist has no security advisory. Gneiss is not experimental. Quartz is documented. Schist is obsolete. Mica is not reverted. Gneiss has a security advisory. Quartz is not backported. Schist has a changelog. Gneiss is not merged. Schist is not backported. Gneiss is not localized. Schist is linted. Schist is not documented. Mica is linted. Mica has a security advisory. Mica has no changelog. Schist is not localized. Mica is not documented.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is notarized, it also is reproducible. Clause 2: once any build is reproducible and also is not merged and also is tested, it also is minified. Clause 3: once any build is not reverted and also is linted, it also is fuzzed. Clause 4: once any build is not signed and also has no security advisory and also is obsolete, it also is profiled. Clause 5: once any build is reproducible and also is experimental and also is not localized, it also has a migration script. Clause 6: once any build is reproducible and also is documented and also is obsolete, it also is versioned. Clause 7: once any build is not backported, it also is notarized. Clause 8: once any build is backported, it also has no feature toggle. Clause 9: once any build has a changelog and also is not backported, it also is benchmarked. Clause 10: once any build is reproducible and also is merged and also is documented, it also is tagged. Clause 11: once any build is reproducible and also is not documented and also is profiled, it also is compiled. Question: Which of these is true of Schist?", "options": ["is tagged", "has a migration script", "is minified", "is compiled", "is versioned"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u019134", "pair_id": "u019134-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019134-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "08b51617e88e488e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a0", "a13", "a22", "a19", "a15"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u019134-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz has a security advisory. Quartz is linted. Schist is reverted. Mica is backported. Schist is not tested. Mica is experimental. Schist is not signed. Gneiss has no changelog. Gneiss is signed. Mica is merged. Quartz has a changelog. Quartz is not signed. Schist has no security advisory. Gneiss is not experimental. Quartz is documented. Schist is obsolete. Mica is not reverted. Gneiss has a security advisory. Quartz is not backported. Schist has a changelog. Gneiss is not merged. Schist is not backported. Gneiss is not localized. Schist is linted. Schist is not documented. Mica is linted. Mica has a security advisory. Mica has no changelog. Schist is not localized. Mica is not documented.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is notarized, it also is reproducible. Clause 2: once any build is reproducible and also is not merged and also is tested, it also is minified. Clause 3: once any build is not reverted and also is linted, it also is fuzzed. Clause 4: once any build is not signed and also has no security advisory and also is obsolete, it also is profiled. Clause 5: once any build is reproducible and also is experimental and also is not localized, it also has a migration script. Clause 6: once any build is reproducible and also is documented and also is obsolete, it also is versioned. Clause 7: once any build is not backported, it also is notarized. Clause 8: once any build is backported, it also has no feature toggle. Clause 9: once any build has a changelog and also is not backported, it also is benchmarked. Clause 10: once any build is reproducible and also is merged and also is documented, it also is tagged. Clause 11: once any build is reproducible and also is not documented and also is profiled, it also is compiled. Question: Which of these is true of Schist?", "options": ["is tagged", "has a migration script", "is minified", "is compiled", "is versioned"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u019134", "pair_id": "u019134-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019134-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "d7f49cfbc6a00283", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a0", "a13", "a22", "a19", "a15"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u019134-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz has a security advisory. Quartz is linted. Schist is not reverted. Mica is backported. Schist is not tested. Mica is experimental. Schist is not signed. Gneiss has no changelog. Gneiss is signed. Mica is merged. Quartz has a changelog. Quartz is not signed. Schist has no security advisory. Gneiss is not experimental. Quartz is documented. Schist is obsolete. Mica is not reverted. Gneiss has a security advisory. Quartz is not backported. Schist has a changelog. Gneiss is not merged. Schist is not backported. Gneiss is not localized. Schist is linted. Schist is not documented. Mica is linted. Mica has a security advisory. Mica has no changelog. Schist is not localized. Mica is not documented.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is notarized, that build is reproducible. Item B. When the build is reproducible, and is not merged, and is tested, that build is minified. Item C. When the build is not reverted, and is linted, that build is fuzzed. Item D. When the build is not signed, and has no security advisory, and is obsolete, that build is profiled. Item E. When the build is reproducible, and is experimental, and is not localized, that build has a migration script. Item F. When the build is reproducible, and is documented, and is obsolete, that build is versioned. Item G. When the build is not backported, that build is notarized. Item H. When the build is backported, that build has no feature toggle. Item I. When the build has a changelog, and is not backported, that build is benchmarked. Item J. When the build is reproducible, and is merged, and is documented, that build is tagged. Item K. When the build is reproducible, and is not documented, and is profiled, that build is compiled. Question: What applies to Schist?", "options": ["is tagged", "has a migration script", "is minified", "is compiled", "is versioned"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u019134", "pair_id": "u019134-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019134-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "08b51617e88e488e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a0", "a13", "a22", "a19", "a15"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u019134-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz has a security advisory. Quartz is linted. Schist is reverted. Mica is backported. Schist is not tested. Mica is experimental. Schist is not signed. Gneiss has no changelog. Gneiss is signed. Mica is merged. Quartz has a changelog. Quartz is not signed. Schist has no security advisory. Gneiss is not experimental. Quartz is documented. Schist is obsolete. Mica is not reverted. Gneiss has a security advisory. Quartz is not backported. Schist has a changelog. Gneiss is not merged. Schist is not backported. Gneiss is not localized. Schist is linted. Schist is not documented. Mica is linted. Mica has a security advisory. Mica has no changelog. Schist is not localized. Mica is not documented.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is notarized, that build is reproducible. Item B. When the build is reproducible, and is not merged, and is tested, that build is minified. Item C. When the build is not reverted, and is linted, that build is fuzzed. Item D. When the build is not signed, and has no security advisory, and is obsolete, that build is profiled. Item E. When the build is reproducible, and is experimental, and is not localized, that build has a migration script. Item F. When the build is reproducible, and is documented, and is obsolete, that build is versioned. Item G. When the build is not backported, that build is notarized. Item H. When the build is backported, that build has no feature toggle. Item I. When the build has a changelog, and is not backported, that build is benchmarked. Item J. When the build is reproducible, and is merged, and is documented, that build is tagged. Item K. When the build is reproducible, and is not documented, and is profiled, that build is compiled. Question: What applies to Schist?", "options": ["is tagged", "has a migration script", "is minified", "is compiled", "is versioned"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u019134", "pair_id": "u019134-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019134-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "d7f49cfbc6a00283", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a0", "a13", "a22", "a19", "a15"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u019198-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is not diabetic. Aurel is not ambulatory. Yusuf is pregnant. Yusuf is contagious. Aurel is not rescheduled. Aurel has a chaperone. Aurel has a caregiver. Yusuf is waitlisted. Aurel is not contagious. Aurel is diabetic. Aurel is waitlisted. Aurel is pregnant. Yusuf has a chaperone. Yusuf is hypertensive. Yusuf has a caregiver. Aurel is triaged. Yusuf is not triaged.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has a caregiver and further is waitlisted and further is rescheduled, it thereby is bedridden. Point B. If said patient is contagious, it thereby is not bedridden. Point C. If said patient is hypertensive, it thereby is not bedridden. Point D. If said patient has a chaperone and further is pregnant and further is rescheduled, it thereby is not postoperative. Point E. If said patient has a caregiver and further is triaged, it thereby is vaccinated. Point F. If said patient has a caregiver and further is diabetic and further is pregnant, it thereby is referred. Point G. If said patient is ambulatory, it thereby is symptomatic. Point H. If said patient is triaged, it thereby is not referred. Point I. If said patient has a caregiver and further is contagious and further is rescheduled, it thereby is admitted. Point A supersedes Point C. Point B supersedes Point A. Point H supersedes Point F. Question: Which choice is true for Aurel?", "options": ["is admitted", "is vaccinated", "is referred", "is bedridden"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is vaccinated", "unit_id": "u019198", "pair_id": "u019198-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019198-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4fe3fc37edbeab42", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a1", "a13", "a6"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u019198-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is not diabetic. Aurel is not ambulatory. Yusuf is pregnant. Yusuf is contagious. Aurel is not rescheduled. Aurel has a chaperone. Aurel has a caregiver. Yusuf is waitlisted. Aurel is not contagious. Aurel is diabetic. Aurel is waitlisted. Aurel is pregnant. Yusuf has a chaperone. Yusuf is hypertensive. Yusuf has a caregiver. Aurel is not triaged. Yusuf is not triaged.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has a caregiver and further is waitlisted and further is rescheduled, it thereby is bedridden. Point B. If said patient is contagious, it thereby is not bedridden. Point C. If said patient is hypertensive, it thereby is not bedridden. Point D. If said patient has a chaperone and further is pregnant and further is rescheduled, it thereby is not postoperative. Point E. If said patient has a caregiver and further is triaged, it thereby is vaccinated. Point F. If said patient has a caregiver and further is diabetic and further is pregnant, it thereby is referred. Point G. If said patient is ambulatory, it thereby is symptomatic. Point H. If said patient is triaged, it thereby is not referred. Point I. If said patient has a caregiver and further is contagious and further is rescheduled, it thereby is admitted. Point A supersedes Point C. Point B supersedes Point A. Point H supersedes Point F. Question: Which choice is true for Aurel?", "options": ["is admitted", "is vaccinated", "is referred", "is bedridden"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is referred", "unit_id": "u019198", "pair_id": "u019198-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019198-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "475afb92089168e6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a1", "a13", "a6"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u019198-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is not diabetic. Aurel is not ambulatory. Yusuf is pregnant. Yusuf is contagious. Aurel is not rescheduled. Aurel has a chaperone. Aurel has a caregiver. Yusuf is waitlisted. Aurel is not contagious. Aurel is diabetic. Aurel is waitlisted. Aurel is pregnant. Yusuf has a chaperone. Yusuf is hypertensive. Yusuf has a caregiver. Aurel is triaged. Yusuf is not triaged.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient has a caregiver and likewise is waitlisted and likewise is rescheduled, so it is bedridden. No. 2 While the given patient is contagious, so it is not bedridden. No. 3 While the given patient is hypertensive, so it is not bedridden. No. 4 While the given patient has a chaperone and likewise is pregnant and likewise is rescheduled, so it is not postoperative. No. 5 While the given patient has a caregiver and likewise is triaged, so it is vaccinated. No. 6 While the given patient has a caregiver and likewise is diabetic and likewise is pregnant, so it is referred. No. 7 While the given patient is ambulatory, so it is symptomatic. No. 8 While the given patient is triaged, so it is not referred. No. 9 While the given patient has a caregiver and likewise is contagious and likewise is rescheduled, so it is admitted. No. 1 wins over No. 3. No. 2 wins over No. 1. No. 8 wins over No. 6. Question: Select what holds for Aurel: which option?", "options": ["is admitted", "is vaccinated", "is referred", "is bedridden"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is vaccinated", "unit_id": "u019198", "pair_id": "u019198-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019198-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4fe3fc37edbeab42", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a1", "a13", "a6"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u019198-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is not diabetic. Aurel is not ambulatory. Yusuf is pregnant. Yusuf is contagious. Aurel is not rescheduled. Aurel has a chaperone. Aurel has a caregiver. Yusuf is waitlisted. Aurel is not contagious. Aurel is diabetic. Aurel is waitlisted. Aurel is pregnant. Yusuf has a chaperone. Yusuf is hypertensive. Yusuf has a caregiver. Aurel is not triaged. Yusuf is not triaged.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient has a caregiver and likewise is waitlisted and likewise is rescheduled, so it is bedridden. No. 2 While the given patient is contagious, so it is not bedridden. No. 3 While the given patient is hypertensive, so it is not bedridden. No. 4 While the given patient has a chaperone and likewise is pregnant and likewise is rescheduled, so it is not postoperative. No. 5 While the given patient has a caregiver and likewise is triaged, so it is vaccinated. No. 6 While the given patient has a caregiver and likewise is diabetic and likewise is pregnant, so it is referred. No. 7 While the given patient is ambulatory, so it is symptomatic. No. 8 While the given patient is triaged, so it is not referred. No. 9 While the given patient has a caregiver and likewise is contagious and likewise is rescheduled, so it is admitted. No. 1 wins over No. 3. No. 2 wins over No. 1. No. 8 wins over No. 6. Question: Select what holds for Aurel: which option?", "options": ["is admitted", "is vaccinated", "is referred", "is bedridden"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is referred", "unit_id": "u019198", "pair_id": "u019198-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019198-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "475afb92089168e6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a1", "a13", "a6"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u019246-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is containerized. Cobalt is not deprecated. Nimbus has a latency budget of 60.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is isolated, then it has no GPU. (2) If a workload has a latency budget above 45, then it is isolated. (3) If a workload is not containerized, then it is not isolated. (4) If a workload is not backed up, then it is not encrypted. Question: Is it true that Cobalt is isolated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019246", "pair_id": "u019246-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019246-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "bb48066979e58828", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019246-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is containerized. Cobalt is not deprecated. Nimbus has a latency budget of 60.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is isolated, then it has no GPU. (2) If a workload has a latency budget above 45, then it is isolated. (3) If a workload is containerized, then it is not isolated. (4) If a workload is not backed up, then it is not encrypted. Question: Is it true that Cobalt is isolated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u019246", "pair_id": "u019246-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019246-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a29de31733bc6056", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019246-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is containerized. Cobalt is not deprecated. Nimbus has a latency budget of 60.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is isolated, that workload has no GPU. Item B. When the workload has a latency budget of more than 45, that workload is isolated. Item C. When the workload is not containerized, that workload is not isolated. Item D. When the workload is not backed up, that workload is not encrypted. Question: Can one infer that Cobalt is isolated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019246", "pair_id": "u019246-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019246-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "bb48066979e58828", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019246-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is containerized. Cobalt is not deprecated. Nimbus has a latency budget of 60.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is isolated, that workload has no GPU. Item B. When the workload has a latency budget of more than 45, that workload is isolated. Item C. When the workload is containerized, that workload is not isolated. Item D. When the workload is not backed up, that workload is not encrypted. Question: Can one infer that Cobalt is isolated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u019246", "pair_id": "u019246-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019246-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a29de31733bc6056", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019250-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra has a replica count of 86. Halcyon has no public endpoint. Borealis has a public endpoint. Halcyon is not patched. Halcyon is not mirrored. Vesper has a replica count of 66. Borealis is patched. Borealis is mirrored.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is encrypted, it also is cached. Clause 2: once any workload is encrypted, it also is deprecated. Clause 3: once any workload is encrypted, it also is not deprecated. Clause 4: once any workload has a replica count under 26, it also is not encrypted. Clause 5: once any workload is not mirrored, it also is encrypted. Clause 6: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also has a snapshot. Clause 7: once any workload has no public endpoint, it also is not cached. Clause 2 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not provisioned. Clause 3 does not hold for a workload when any workload is provisioned. Clause 5 does not hold for a workload when any workload is patched. Clause 4 does not hold for a workload when any workload is mirrored. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Clause 7 overrides Clause 1. Clause 2 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Halcyon is not deprecated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u019250", "pair_id": "u019250-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019250-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f3efc47ce023b73b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019250-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra has a replica count of 86. Halcyon is not provisioned. Halcyon has no public endpoint. Borealis has a public endpoint. Halcyon is not patched. Halcyon is not mirrored. Vesper has a replica count of 66. Borealis is patched. Borealis is mirrored.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is encrypted, it also is cached. Clause 2: once any workload is encrypted, it also is deprecated. Clause 3: once any workload is encrypted, it also is not deprecated. Clause 4: once any workload has a replica count under 26, it also is not encrypted. Clause 5: once any workload is not mirrored, it also is encrypted. Clause 6: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also has a snapshot. Clause 7: once any workload has no public endpoint, it also is not cached. Clause 2 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not provisioned. Clause 3 does not hold for a workload when any workload is provisioned. Clause 5 does not hold for a workload when any workload is patched. Clause 4 does not hold for a workload when any workload is mirrored. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Clause 7 overrides Clause 1. Clause 2 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Halcyon is not deprecated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019250", "pair_id": "u019250-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019250-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "444f98c110f1ffe7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019262-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is solvent. Ingrid has a risk tier of 31. Tomas is pensioned. Dagny is not delinquent. Ingrid is delinquent. Tomas is not solvent. Tomas has a risk tier of 73. Dagny is solvent. Dagny has no cosigner. Tomas has no cosigner.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has a mortgage provided that it is solvent as well as has a cosigner. Section 2: a borrower is not prequalified provided that it is pensioned as well as has a risk tier exceeding 65. Section 3: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it is pensioned as well as is delinquent. Section 4: a borrower is prequalified provided that it is delinquent. Section 5: a borrower has no mortgage provided that it is pensioned. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Tomas is delinquent. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019262", "pair_id": "u019262-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019262-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5eb9260314a34c0e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019262-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is solvent. Ingrid has a risk tier of 31. Tomas is pensioned. Dagny is not delinquent. Ingrid is delinquent. Tomas is delinquent. Tomas is not solvent. Tomas has a risk tier of 73. Dagny is solvent. Dagny has no cosigner. Tomas has no cosigner.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has a mortgage provided that it is solvent as well as has a cosigner. Section 2: a borrower is not prequalified provided that it is pensioned as well as has a risk tier exceeding 65. Section 3: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it is pensioned as well as is delinquent. Section 4: a borrower is prequalified provided that it is delinquent. Section 5: a borrower has no mortgage provided that it is pensioned. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Tomas is delinquent. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019262", "pair_id": "u019262-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019262-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "85b2eedc1389f42c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019282-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is not vetted. Anouk has a lien. Greta has collateral. Folke has no collateral. Anouk is not vetted. Greta is vetted. Evren is not a depositor. Anouk is a depositor. Folke has a lien. Folke is a depositor.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is pensioned provided that it is foreclosed. Section 2: a borrower is prequalified provided that it has a lien. Section 3: a borrower has a mortgage provided that it has collateral. Section 4: a borrower is overdrawn provided that it is a depositor. Section 5: a borrower has no mortgage provided that it has collateral. Section 6: a borrower is not foreclosed provided that it is underwritten. Section 7: a borrower is foreclosed provided that it is not overdrawn. Section 8: a borrower is garnished provided that it is vetted. Section 9: a borrower is underwritten provided that it has collateral. Section 10: a borrower is not garnished provided that it has collateral. Section 11: a borrower is refinanced provided that it has a mortgage. Section 12: a borrower is not pensioned provided that it is refinanced. Section 13: a borrower is employed provided that it is vetted. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 12 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Anouk is pensioned. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019282", "pair_id": "u019282-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019282-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f5574f6baa899104", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u019282-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is not vetted. Anouk has a lien. Greta has collateral. Folke has no collateral. Anouk is not vetted. Greta is vetted. Evren is not a depositor. Anouk is a depositor. Folke has a lien. Folke is a depositor.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is pensioned provided that it is foreclosed. Section 2: a borrower is prequalified provided that it has a lien. Section 3: a borrower has a mortgage provided that it has collateral. Section 4: a borrower is overdrawn provided that it is a depositor. Section 5: a borrower has no mortgage provided that it has collateral. Section 6: a borrower is not foreclosed provided that it is underwritten. Section 7: a borrower is foreclosed provided that it is overdrawn. Section 8: a borrower is garnished provided that it is vetted. Section 9: a borrower is underwritten provided that it has collateral. Section 10: a borrower is not garnished provided that it has collateral. Section 11: a borrower is refinanced provided that it has a mortgage. Section 12: a borrower is not pensioned provided that it is refinanced. Section 13: a borrower is employed provided that it is vetted. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 12 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Anouk is pensioned. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019282", "pair_id": "u019282-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019282-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "412d9cefae8c2922", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u019282-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is not vetted. Anouk has a lien. Greta has collateral. Folke has no collateral. Anouk is not vetted. Greta is vetted. Evren is not a depositor. Anouk is a depositor. Folke has a lien. Folke is a depositor.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then is pensioned. #2 Each time a borrower has a lien, it then is prequalified. #3 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then has a mortgage. #4 Each time a borrower is a depositor, it then is overdrawn. #5 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then has no mortgage. #6 Each time a borrower is underwritten, it then is not foreclosed. #7 Each time a borrower is not overdrawn, it then is foreclosed. #8 Each time a borrower is vetted, it then is garnished. #9 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then is underwritten. #10 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then is not garnished. #11 Each time a borrower has a mortgage, it then is refinanced. #12 Each time a borrower is refinanced, it then is not pensioned. #13 Each time a borrower is vetted, it then is employed. #5 yields to #3. #8 yields to #10. #6 yields to #7. #1 yields to #12. Question: Do the terms above show that Anouk is pensioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019282", "pair_id": "u019282-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019282-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f5574f6baa899104", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u019282-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is not vetted. Anouk has a lien. Greta has collateral. Folke has no collateral. Anouk is not vetted. Greta is vetted. Evren is not a depositor. Anouk is a depositor. Folke has a lien. Folke is a depositor.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then is pensioned. #2 Each time a borrower has a lien, it then is prequalified. #3 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then has a mortgage. #4 Each time a borrower is a depositor, it then is overdrawn. #5 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then has no mortgage. #6 Each time a borrower is underwritten, it then is not foreclosed. #7 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is foreclosed. #8 Each time a borrower is vetted, it then is garnished. #9 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then is underwritten. #10 Each time a borrower has collateral, it then is not garnished. #11 Each time a borrower has a mortgage, it then is refinanced. #12 Each time a borrower is refinanced, it then is not pensioned. #13 Each time a borrower is vetted, it then is employed. #5 yields to #3. #8 yields to #10. #6 yields to #7. #1 yields to #12. Question: Do the terms above show that Anouk is pensioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019282", "pair_id": "u019282-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019282-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "412d9cefae8c2922", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u019360-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is palletized. Thilo is prepaid. Nandor is delayed. Thilo is rerouted. Jory is not delayed. Jory is oversized. Nandor is not stamped. Priya is not undeliverable. Nandor is not rerouted. Nandor is not damaged. Nandor is not oversized. Jory is prepaid. Thilo is not delayed. Nandor is not prepaid. Priya is stamped. Thilo is palletized. Thilo is not damaged. Jory is not rerouted. Nandor is not undeliverable.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is not prepaid, that parcel is refrigerated. Item B. When the parcel is undeliverable, and is palletized, that parcel is not refrigerated. Item C. When the parcel is rerouted, and is stamped, that parcel is not hazardous. Item D. When the parcel is prepaid, and is not rerouted, that parcel is not fragile. Item E. When the parcel is hazardous, and is not oversized, that parcel is not labeled. Item F. When the parcel is hazardous, and is oversized, and is damaged, that parcel is labeled. Item G. When the parcel is fragile, and is not stamped, that parcel is hazardous. Item H. When the parcel is not delayed, that parcel is fragile. Item C is suspended when the parcel is palletized, and is rerouted. Item H outranks Item D. Item F outranks Item E. Item G outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Nandor is labeled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019360", "pair_id": "u019360-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019360-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f92ff20a9199ee72", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 21}}
{"id": "syn-u019360-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is palletized. Thilo is prepaid. Nandor is delayed. Thilo is rerouted. Jory is not delayed. Jory is oversized. Nandor is not stamped. Priya is not undeliverable. Nandor is not rerouted. Nandor is not damaged. Nandor is not oversized. Jory is prepaid. Thilo is not delayed. Nandor is not prepaid. Priya is stamped. Thilo is palletized. Thilo is not damaged. Jory is not rerouted. Nandor is not undeliverable.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is not prepaid, that parcel is refrigerated. Item B. When the parcel is not undeliverable, and is palletized, that parcel is not refrigerated. Item C. When the parcel is rerouted, and is stamped, that parcel is not hazardous. Item D. When the parcel is prepaid, and is not rerouted, that parcel is not fragile. Item E. When the parcel is hazardous, and is not oversized, that parcel is not labeled. Item F. When the parcel is hazardous, and is oversized, and is damaged, that parcel is labeled. Item G. When the parcel is fragile, and is not stamped, that parcel is hazardous. Item H. When the parcel is not delayed, that parcel is fragile. Item C is suspended when the parcel is palletized, and is rerouted. Item H outranks Item D. Item F outranks Item E. Item G outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Nandor is labeled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019360", "pair_id": "u019360-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019360-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e54a9f08c6e48616", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 21}}
{"id": "syn-u019443-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is containerized. Juno is idle. Juno has a dedicated host. Juno is not cached. Juno is monitored.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a dedicated host and further is encrypted, it thereby is not mirrored. Point B. If said workload has a dedicated host and further is cached, it thereby is mirrored. Point C. If said workload is not containerized, it thereby is not autoscaled. Point D. If said workload is mirrored and further is monitored, it thereby is sharded. Point B is cancelled if said workload is encrypted and further is idle. Point A is cancelled if said workload is encrypted and further is monitored. Question: Statement: Juno is mirrored. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019443", "pair_id": "u019443-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019443-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7981c92e712c7437", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u019443-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is containerized. Juno is idle. Juno has a dedicated host. Juno is not cached. Juno is monitored.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a dedicated host and further is encrypted, it thereby is not mirrored. Point B. If said workload has a dedicated host and further is cached, it thereby is mirrored. Point C. If said workload is containerized, it thereby is not autoscaled. Point D. If said workload is mirrored and further is monitored, it thereby is sharded. Point B is cancelled if said workload is encrypted and further is idle. Point A is cancelled if said workload is encrypted and further is monitored. Question: Statement: Juno is mirrored. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019443", "pair_id": "u019443-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019443-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b155df3eca72821d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u019443-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is containerized. Juno is idle. Juno has a dedicated host. Juno is not cached. Juno is monitored.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a dedicated host and likewise is encrypted, so it is not mirrored. No. 2 While the given workload has a dedicated host and likewise is cached, so it is mirrored. No. 3 While the given workload is not containerized, so it is not autoscaled. No. 4 While the given workload is mirrored and likewise is monitored, so it is sharded. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given workload is encrypted and likewise is idle. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload is encrypted and likewise is monitored. Question: Is the claim \"Juno is mirrored\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019443", "pair_id": "u019443-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019443-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7981c92e712c7437", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u019443-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is containerized. Juno is idle. Juno has a dedicated host. Juno is not cached. Juno is monitored.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a dedicated host and likewise is encrypted, so it is not mirrored. No. 2 While the given workload has a dedicated host and likewise is cached, so it is mirrored. No. 3 While the given workload is containerized, so it is not autoscaled. No. 4 While the given workload is mirrored and likewise is monitored, so it is sharded. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given workload is encrypted and likewise is idle. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload is encrypted and likewise is monitored. Question: Is the claim \"Juno is mirrored\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019443", "pair_id": "u019443-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019443-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b155df3eca72821d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u019459-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata has a premium band of 92. Wanda is bundled. Agata has flood coverage. Una has flood coverage. Wanda has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has a premium band short of 64, it thereby is appraised. Point B. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby is lapsed. Point C. If said policyholder is not bundled, it thereby is not appraised. Point D. If said policyholder is appraised, it thereby is disputed. Point E. If said policyholder is not bundled, it thereby is grandfathered. Question: Statement: Agata is appraised. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019459", "pair_id": "u019459-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019459-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "9dd2e6ac7e5acbd6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019459-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata has a premium band of 92. Wanda is bundled. Agata has flood coverage. Una has flood coverage. Wanda has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has a premium band short of 64, it thereby is appraised. Point B. If said policyholder has no flood coverage, it thereby is lapsed. Point C. If said policyholder is not bundled, it thereby is not appraised. Point D. If said policyholder is appraised, it thereby is disputed. Point E. If said policyholder is not bundled, it thereby is grandfathered. Question: Statement: Agata is appraised. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019459", "pair_id": "u019459-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019459-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1ef871ee8f4e572e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019468-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zora is referred. Zora is ambulatory.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is referred, thus it is not vaccinated. Provision 2: when the patient here is not vaccinated, thus it is asthmatic. Provision 3: when the patient here is asthmatic, thus it has a pacemaker. Provision 4: when the patient here is contagious, thus it is admitted. Provision 5: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it is contagious. Provision 6: when the patient here is ambulatory, thus it is diabetic. Provision 7: when the patient here is asthmatic, thus it is not sedated. Provision 8: when the patient here is admitted, thus it is allergic. Provision 3 has no effect when the patient here is pregnant. Question: Which one describes Zora?", "options": ["is allergic", "has a pacemaker"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a pacemaker", "unit_id": "u019468", "pair_id": "u019468-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019468-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b15e8ebaae980c87", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019468-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zora is referred. Zora is pregnant. Zora is ambulatory.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is referred, thus it is not vaccinated. Provision 2: when the patient here is not vaccinated, thus it is asthmatic. Provision 3: when the patient here is asthmatic, thus it has a pacemaker. Provision 4: when the patient here is contagious, thus it is admitted. Provision 5: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it is contagious. Provision 6: when the patient here is ambulatory, thus it is diabetic. Provision 7: when the patient here is asthmatic, thus it is not sedated. Provision 8: when the patient here is admitted, thus it is allergic. Provision 3 has no effect when the patient here is pregnant. Question: Which one describes Zora?", "options": ["is allergic", "has a pacemaker"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is allergic", "unit_id": "u019468", "pair_id": "u019468-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019468-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "285d2817768ff6d4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019473-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Corin is not delinquent. Corin has a debt ratio of 88. Wiebke has a repayment grade of 45. Greta has a lien. Ilse is not employed. Greta is not delinquent. Greta has a debt ratio of 9. Corin has a risk tier of 94. Ilse is audited. Wiebke has a lien. Ilse has no lien. Greta is not employed. Wiebke is delinquent. Wiebke has no mortgage. Wiebke is employed. Wiebke has a guarantor. Corin has no guarantor. Greta has a repayment grade of 87. Wiebke is solvent. Greta is audited. Wiebke is audited. Corin is not employed. Wiebke has a risk tier of 2. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 30. Greta is solvent. Corin has a mortgage.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is employed and also is audited, it also is overdrawn. Clause 2: once any borrower is a homeowner and also is audited, it also is garnished. Clause 3: once any borrower has a lien, it also is foreclosed. Clause 4: once any borrower has collateral, it also is not creditworthy. Clause 5: once any borrower is solvent, it also has no cosigner. Clause 6: once any borrower has a risk tier of 57 or less, it also is a homeowner. Clause 7: once any borrower is garnished and also has collateral and also is delinquent, it also has a cosigner. Clause 8: once any borrower is audited, it also is not refinanced. Clause 9: once any borrower is overdrawn and also has a mortgage and also is employed, it also is not garnished. Clause 10: once any borrower is garnished and also has a repayment grade of 68 or more, it also is indebted. Clause 11: once any borrower has a guarantor and also is audited, it also is refinanced. Clause 12: once any borrower is garnished and also is delinquent and also is foreclosed, it also is creditworthy. Clause 11 overrides Clause 8. Clause 7 overrides Clause 5. Clause 9 overrides Clause 2. Clause 4 overrides Clause 12. Question: Which of these is true of Wiebke?", "options": ["has a cosigner", "is indebted", "is creditworthy"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is creditworthy", "unit_id": "u019473", "pair_id": "u019473-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/10", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019473-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "62f56dde37ed99f6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a16", "a13"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u019473-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Corin is not delinquent. Corin has a debt ratio of 88. Wiebke has a repayment grade of 45. Greta has a lien. Ilse is not employed. Greta is not delinquent. Greta has a debt ratio of 9. Corin has a risk tier of 94. Ilse is audited. Wiebke has a lien. Ilse has no lien. Greta is not employed. Wiebke is delinquent. Wiebke has no mortgage. Wiebke is employed. Wiebke has a guarantor. Corin has no guarantor. Greta has a repayment grade of 87. Wiebke is solvent. Greta is audited. Wiebke is audited. Corin is not employed. Wiebke has a risk tier of 2. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 30. Greta is solvent. Corin has a mortgage.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is employed and also is audited, it also is overdrawn. Clause 2: once any borrower is a homeowner and also is audited, it also is garnished. Clause 3: once any borrower has a lien, it also is foreclosed. Clause 4: once any borrower has collateral, it also is not creditworthy. Clause 5: once any borrower is solvent, it also has no cosigner. Clause 6: once any borrower has a risk tier of 57 or less, it also is a homeowner. Clause 7: once any borrower is garnished and also has collateral and also is delinquent, it also has a cosigner. Clause 8: once any borrower is audited, it also is not refinanced. Clause 9: once any borrower is overdrawn and also has a mortgage and also is employed, it also is not garnished. Clause 10: once any borrower is garnished and also has a repayment grade of 68 or more, it also is indebted. Clause 11: once any borrower has a debt ratio of 63 or less, it also has collateral. Clause 12: once any borrower has a guarantor and also is audited, it also is refinanced. Clause 13: once any borrower is garnished and also is delinquent and also is foreclosed, it also is creditworthy. Clause 12 overrides Clause 8. Clause 7 overrides Clause 5. Clause 9 overrides Clause 2. Clause 4 overrides Clause 13. Question: Which of these is true of Wiebke?", "options": ["has a cosigner", "is indebted", "is creditworthy"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a cosigner", "unit_id": "u019473", "pair_id": "u019473-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/10", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019473-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "32875e9cf7a09a5c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a16", "a13"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u019493-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri is not reinstated. Dmitri has no roadside assistance. Wanda has roadside assistance. Dmitri has a premium band of 80. Bruno has a premium band of 31. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Dmitri has a deductible waiver. Bruno has a claim frequency of 79. Viggo has no deductible waiver.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, and has a premium band of no less than 86, and is reinstated, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item B. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, and has a premium band of less than 86, that policyholder is not grandfathered. Item C. When the policyholder has a deductible waiver, and has a premium band of no more than 49, that policyholder is uninsurable. Item D. When the policyholder has a claim frequency of more than 78, that policyholder is not uninsurable. Item B outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Dmitri is not grandfathered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019493", "pair_id": "u019493-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019493-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a54c457a801caef0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u019493-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri is not reinstated. Dmitri has no roadside assistance. Wanda has roadside assistance. Dmitri has a premium band of 80. Bruno has a premium band of 31. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Dmitri has a deductible waiver. Bruno has a claim frequency of 79. Viggo has no deductible waiver.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, and has a premium band of no less than 86, and is reinstated, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item B. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, and has a premium band of less than 86, that policyholder is not grandfathered. Item C. When the policyholder has a deductible waiver, and has a premium band of no more than 49, that policyholder is uninsurable. Item D. When the policyholder has a claim frequency of more than 78, that policyholder is not uninsurable. Item B outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Dmitri is not grandfathered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019493", "pair_id": "u019493-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019493-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3680aad2c08f4e29", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u019541-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek has a pain level of 11. Vilja is allergic. Cosima is not anemic. Benedek has a pulse rate of 11. Vilja has a pulse rate of 85. Cosima is not asthmatic. Vilja has a pain level of 8. Benedek is allergic. Vilja is anemic. Cosima has a pulse rate of 68. Benedek is anemic. Vilja is not asthmatic.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is ambulatory provided that it is allergic as well as is asthmatic. Section 2: a patient is not waitlisted provided that it is anemic as well as has a pain level exceeding 48. Section 3: a patient is waitlisted provided that it is anemic as well as has a pain level of 48 or lower. Section 4: a patient is pregnant provided that it is anemic. Section 4 lapses for a patient if it has a pain level of 67 or higher. Section 2 lapses for a patient if it has a pulse rate of 44 or higher. Question: Benedek is not waitlisted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u019541", "pair_id": "u019541-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019541-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "213541698c382c11", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 63}}
{"id": "syn-u019541-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek has a pain level of 91. Vilja is allergic. Cosima is not anemic. Benedek has a pulse rate of 11. Vilja has a pulse rate of 85. Cosima is not asthmatic. Vilja has a pain level of 8. Benedek is allergic. Vilja is anemic. Cosima has a pulse rate of 68. Benedek is anemic. Vilja is not asthmatic.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is ambulatory provided that it is allergic as well as is asthmatic. Section 2: a patient is not waitlisted provided that it is anemic as well as has a pain level exceeding 48. Section 3: a patient is waitlisted provided that it is anemic as well as has a pain level of 48 or lower. Section 4: a patient is pregnant provided that it is anemic. Section 4 lapses for a patient if it has a pain level of 67 or higher. Section 2 lapses for a patient if it has a pulse rate of 44 or higher. Question: Benedek is not waitlisted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019541", "pair_id": "u019541-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019541-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "526bb724d7ad9ead", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 63}}
{"id": "syn-u019541-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek has a pain level of 11. Vilja is allergic. Cosima is not anemic. Benedek has a pulse rate of 11. Vilja has a pulse rate of 85. Cosima is not asthmatic. Vilja has a pain level of 8. Benedek is allergic. Vilja is anemic. Cosima has a pulse rate of 68. Benedek is anemic. Vilja is not asthmatic.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is allergic and additionally is asthmatic, it then is ambulatory. #2 Each time a patient is anemic and additionally has a pain level greater than 48, it then is not waitlisted. #3 Each time a patient is anemic and additionally has a pain level of 48 or below, it then is waitlisted. #4 Each time a patient is anemic, it then is pregnant. #4 is set aside if a patient has a pain level of 67 or above. #2 is set aside if a patient has a pulse rate of 44 or above. Question: Do the terms above show that Benedek is not waitlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u019541", "pair_id": "u019541-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019541-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "213541698c382c11", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 63}}
{"id": "syn-u019541-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek has a pain level of 91. Vilja is allergic. Cosima is not anemic. Benedek has a pulse rate of 11. Vilja has a pulse rate of 85. Cosima is not asthmatic. Vilja has a pain level of 8. Benedek is allergic. Vilja is anemic. Cosima has a pulse rate of 68. Benedek is anemic. Vilja is not asthmatic.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is allergic and additionally is asthmatic, it then is ambulatory. #2 Each time a patient is anemic and additionally has a pain level greater than 48, it then is not waitlisted. #3 Each time a patient is anemic and additionally has a pain level of 48 or below, it then is waitlisted. #4 Each time a patient is anemic, it then is pregnant. #4 is set aside if a patient has a pain level of 67 or above. #2 is set aside if a patient has a pulse rate of 44 or above. Question: Do the terms above show that Benedek is not waitlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019541", "pair_id": "u019541-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019541-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "526bb724d7ad9ead", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 63}}
{"id": "syn-u019570-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela is undeliverable. Mirela is not labeled. Nandor has a delivery window of 9. Mirela is prepaid. Priya has a delivery window of 97. Mirela has a delivery window of 89. Priya is undeliverable. Saskia is prepaid. Priya is labeled. Saskia has a delivery window of 72. Mirela is misrouted. Nandor is misrouted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is prepaid, it then is weighed. #2 Each time a parcel is oversized, it then has a waybill. #3 Each time a parcel is prepaid, it then is not weighed. #4 Each time a parcel is misrouted, it then is not oversized. #5 Each time a parcel is weighed, it then is refrigerated. #6 Each time a parcel is labeled, it then is sealed. #7 Each time a parcel has a delivery window greater than 71, it then is oversized. #8 Each time a parcel has a waybill, it then is not consolidated. #9 Each time a parcel is undeliverable, it then has no waybill. #10 Each time a parcel is prepaid, it then is not sealed. #11 Each time a parcel is refrigerated, it then is consolidated. #10 yields to #6. #3 yields to #1. #9 yields to #2. #8 yields to #11. #4 yields to #7. Question: Do the terms above show that Mirela is consolidated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019570", "pair_id": "u019570-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019570-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fb7dc8a918f78f6c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019570-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela is undeliverable. Mirela is not labeled. Nandor has a delivery window of 9. Mirela is prepaid. Priya has a delivery window of 97. Mirela has a delivery window of 89. Priya is undeliverable. Saskia is prepaid. Priya is labeled. Saskia has a delivery window of 72. Mirela is misrouted. Nandor is misrouted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is prepaid, it then is weighed. #2 Each time a parcel is oversized, it then has a waybill. #3 Each time a parcel is prepaid, it then is not weighed. #4 Each time a parcel is misrouted, it then is not oversized. #5 Each time a parcel is weighed, it then is refrigerated. #6 Each time a parcel is labeled, it then is sealed. #7 Each time a parcel has a delivery window greater than 71, it then is oversized. #8 Each time a parcel has a waybill, it then is not consolidated. #9 Each time a parcel is undeliverable, it then has no waybill. #10 Each time a parcel is prepaid, it then is not sealed. #11 Each time a parcel is refrigerated, it then is consolidated. #10 yields to #6. #3 yields to #1. #2 yields to #9. #8 yields to #11. #4 yields to #7. Question: Do the terms above show that Mirela is consolidated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019570", "pair_id": "u019570-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019570-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "34e21825a5722550", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019609-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not hazardous. Kaveh is not fragile. Kaveh has a delivery window of 0.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is hazardous, then it is not oversized. (2) If a parcel is consolidated, then it is not delayed. (3) If a parcel has a courier, then it is delayed. (4) If a parcel is hazardous, then it has a courier. (5) If a parcel is not fragile, then it is oversized. (6) If a parcel is not hazardous, then it has no courier. (7) If a parcel has a delivery window of at least 15, then it is consolidated. (8) If a parcel has a weight class of at most 59, then it is not consolidated. When (3) and (2) clash, (3) prevails. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. When (5) and (1) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Kaveh is delayed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019609", "pair_id": "u019609-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019609-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1a536909a0282573", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019609-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not hazardous. Kaveh is not fragile. Kaveh has a delivery window of 0.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is hazardous, then it is not oversized. (2) If a parcel is consolidated, then it is not delayed. (3) If a parcel has a courier, then it is delayed. (4) If a parcel is hazardous, then it has a courier. (5) If a parcel is fragile, then it is oversized. (6) If a parcel is not hazardous, then it has no courier. (7) If a parcel has a delivery window of at least 15, then it is consolidated. (8) If a parcel has a weight class of at most 59, then it is not consolidated. When (3) and (2) clash, (3) prevails. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. When (5) and (1) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Kaveh is delayed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019609", "pair_id": "u019609-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019609-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "efd32fef8d6e3105", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019713-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh has a postal zone of 16. Kaveh is not weighed. Kaveh is not rerouted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby has a locker slot. Point B. If said parcel is not rerouted, it thereby is not undeliverable. Point C. If said parcel is fragile, it thereby is hazardous. Point D. If said parcel is perishable, it thereby is fragile. Point E. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby has a courier. Point F. If said parcel is fragile, it thereby is not hazardous. Point D is cancelled if said parcel has a parcel volume of minimum 68. Point F is cancelled if said parcel is not weighed. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is weighed. Question: Statement: Kaveh is hazardous. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019713", "pair_id": "u019713-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019713-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d9f3fce5e377d4f6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019713-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh has a postal zone of 16. Kaveh is not weighed. Kaveh is not rerouted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel has a postal zone short of 47, it thereby is perishable. Point B. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby has a locker slot. Point C. If said parcel is not rerouted, it thereby is not undeliverable. Point D. If said parcel is fragile, it thereby is hazardous. Point E. If said parcel is perishable, it thereby is fragile. Point F. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby has a courier. Point G. If said parcel is fragile, it thereby is not hazardous. Point E is cancelled if said parcel has a parcel volume of minimum 68. Point G is cancelled if said parcel is not weighed. Point D is cancelled if said parcel is weighed. Question: Statement: Kaveh is hazardous. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019713", "pair_id": "u019713-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019713-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bc47b51750df3f27", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019717-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf is bedridden. Dorian is not fasting. Florin is bedridden. Wendel is not pregnant. Yusuf is not fasting. Florin is not diabetic.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is not fasting and is bedridden, then it is contagious. (2) If a patient is diabetic, then it is not contagious. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Wendel is not pregnant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019717", "pair_id": "u019717-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019717-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cf696dd28cadac47", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019717-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf is bedridden. Dorian is not fasting. Florin is bedridden. Wendel is not pregnant. Yusuf is not fasting. Wendel is bedridden. Florin is not diabetic.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is not fasting and is bedridden, then it is contagious. (2) If a patient is diabetic, then it is not contagious. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Wendel is not pregnant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019717", "pair_id": "u019717-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019717-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "79edf0c132400a1c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019747-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is not litigated. Una is subrogated. Wanda is not subrogated. Zdenek is not grandfathered. Una is covered. Una is reimbursed. Zdenek is bundled. Zdenek is covered. Zdenek has no premium discount. Una is not grandfathered. Una is not bundled. Zdenek is not subrogated. Zdenek is indemnified. Zdenek is not litigated. Wanda is not bundled. Una is not indemnified. Una is litigated. Wanda is covered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby has roadside assistance. Point B. If said policyholder is reinstated and further is indemnified and further is subrogated, it thereby has no rider. Point C. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby is retired. Point D. If said policyholder has roadside assistance and further is reimbursed and further is subrogated, it thereby is reinstated. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is indemnified and further is grandfathered. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is reimbursed and further is bundled. Question: Statement: Una has no rider. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019747", "pair_id": "u019747-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019747-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5e8ea0cebf4d15f5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019747-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is not litigated. Una is subrogated. Wanda is not subrogated. Zdenek is not grandfathered. Una is covered. Una is reimbursed. Zdenek is bundled. Zdenek is covered. Zdenek has no premium discount. Una is not grandfathered. Una is not bundled. Zdenek is not subrogated. Zdenek is indemnified. Zdenek is not litigated. Wanda is not bundled. Una is not indemnified. Una is litigated. Wanda is covered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby has roadside assistance. Point B. If said policyholder is reinstated and further is indemnified and further is subrogated, it thereby has no rider. Point C. If said policyholder is reinstated and further is covered and further is litigated, it thereby has a rider. Point D. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby is retired. Point E. If said policyholder has roadside assistance and further is reimbursed and further is subrogated, it thereby is reinstated. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder is indemnified and further is grandfathered. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder is reimbursed and further is bundled. Question: Statement: Una has no rider. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u019747", "pair_id": "u019747-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019747-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8d0d54a0f04fc303", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019774-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is registered. Nandor is not damaged. Nandor is not tracked. Nandor has a locker slot. Nandor has a waybill. Nandor is not hazardous. Nandor is delayed. Nandor has no barcode. Nandor is not weighed. Nandor is not rerouted. Nandor is perishable. Nandor is oversized.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is scanned and has a waybill and is fragile, then it is stamped. (2) If a parcel is not undeliverable, then it is not misrouted. (3) If a parcel is not weighed, then it is not refrigerated. (4) If a parcel is scanned and is not oversized and is not damaged, then it is misrouted. (5) If a parcel is scanned and is rerouted, then it is prepaid. (6) If a parcel has a barcode, then it is not prepaid. (7) If a parcel is perishable, then it is scanned. (8) If a parcel is delayed and is tracked, then it is not scanned. (9) If a parcel is scanned and has no locker slot and has a waybill, then it is consolidated. (10) If a parcel is scanned and has no waybill, then it is palletized. (11) If a parcel is scanned and is not undeliverable and is hazardous, then it is labeled. (12) If a parcel is scanned and has a locker slot and is oversized, then it has a courier. (13) If a parcel is not labeled and is not hazardous and is registered, then it is refrigerated. When (2) and (4) clash, (2) prevails. When (5) and (6) clash, (5) prevails. When (13) and (3) clash, (13) prevails. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Nandor?", "options": ["is palletized", "has a courier", "is prepaid", "is consolidated", "is labeled", "is stamped", "is misrouted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a courier", "unit_id": "u019774", "pair_id": "u019774-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019774-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6def63c19ffff6d7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a6", "a1", "a19", "a8", "a10", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019774-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is registered. Nandor is not damaged. Nandor is not tracked. Nandor has a locker slot. Nandor has a waybill. Nandor is not hazardous. Nandor is delayed. Nandor has no barcode. Nandor is not weighed. Nandor is not rerouted. Nandor is perishable. Nandor is not oversized.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is scanned and has a waybill and is fragile, then it is stamped. (2) If a parcel is not undeliverable, then it is not misrouted. (3) If a parcel is not weighed, then it is not refrigerated. (4) If a parcel is scanned and is not oversized and is not damaged, then it is misrouted. (5) If a parcel is scanned and is rerouted, then it is prepaid. (6) If a parcel has a barcode, then it is not prepaid. (7) If a parcel is perishable, then it is scanned. (8) If a parcel is delayed and is tracked, then it is not scanned. (9) If a parcel is scanned and has no locker slot and has a waybill, then it is consolidated. (10) If a parcel is scanned and has no waybill, then it is palletized. (11) If a parcel is scanned and is not undeliverable and is hazardous, then it is labeled. (12) If a parcel is scanned and has a locker slot and is oversized, then it has a courier. (13) If a parcel is not labeled and is not hazardous and is registered, then it is refrigerated. When (2) and (4) clash, (2) prevails. When (5) and (6) clash, (5) prevails. When (13) and (3) clash, (13) prevails. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Nandor?", "options": ["is palletized", "has a courier", "is prepaid", "is consolidated", "is labeled", "is stamped", "is misrouted"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is misrouted", "unit_id": "u019774", "pair_id": "u019774-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019774-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "dbde498e58205ce7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a6", "a1", "a19", "a8", "a10", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019774-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is registered. Nandor is not damaged. Nandor is not tracked. Nandor has a locker slot. Nandor has a waybill. Nandor is not hazardous. Nandor is delayed. Nandor has no barcode. Nandor is not weighed. Nandor is not rerouted. Nandor is perishable. Nandor is oversized.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is scanned and also has a waybill and also is fragile, it also is stamped. Clause 2: once any parcel is not undeliverable, it also is not misrouted. Clause 3: once any parcel is not weighed, it also is not refrigerated. Clause 4: once any parcel is scanned and also is not oversized and also is not damaged, it also is misrouted. Clause 5: once any parcel is scanned and also is rerouted, it also is prepaid. Clause 6: once any parcel has a barcode, it also is not prepaid. Clause 7: once any parcel is perishable, it also is scanned. Clause 8: once any parcel is delayed and also is tracked, it also is not scanned. Clause 9: once any parcel is scanned and also has no locker slot and also has a waybill, it also is consolidated. Clause 10: once any parcel is scanned and also has no waybill, it also is palletized. Clause 11: once any parcel is scanned and also is not undeliverable and also is hazardous, it also is labeled. Clause 12: once any parcel is scanned and also has a locker slot and also is oversized, it also has a courier. Clause 13: once any parcel is not labeled and also is not hazardous and also is registered, it also is refrigerated. Clause 2 overrides Clause 4. Clause 5 overrides Clause 6. Clause 13 overrides Clause 3. Clause 8 overrides Clause 7. Question: Which of these is true of Nandor?", "options": ["is palletized", "has a courier", "is prepaid", "is consolidated", "is labeled", "is stamped", "is misrouted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a courier", "unit_id": "u019774", "pair_id": "u019774-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019774-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6def63c19ffff6d7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a6", "a1", "a19", "a8", "a10", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019774-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is registered. Nandor is not damaged. Nandor is not tracked. Nandor has a locker slot. Nandor has a waybill. Nandor is not hazardous. Nandor is delayed. Nandor has no barcode. Nandor is not weighed. Nandor is not rerouted. Nandor is perishable. Nandor is not oversized.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is scanned and also has a waybill and also is fragile, it also is stamped. Clause 2: once any parcel is not undeliverable, it also is not misrouted. Clause 3: once any parcel is not weighed, it also is not refrigerated. Clause 4: once any parcel is scanned and also is not oversized and also is not damaged, it also is misrouted. Clause 5: once any parcel is scanned and also is rerouted, it also is prepaid. Clause 6: once any parcel has a barcode, it also is not prepaid. Clause 7: once any parcel is perishable, it also is scanned. Clause 8: once any parcel is delayed and also is tracked, it also is not scanned. Clause 9: once any parcel is scanned and also has no locker slot and also has a waybill, it also is consolidated. Clause 10: once any parcel is scanned and also has no waybill, it also is palletized. Clause 11: once any parcel is scanned and also is not undeliverable and also is hazardous, it also is labeled. Clause 12: once any parcel is scanned and also has a locker slot and also is oversized, it also has a courier. Clause 13: once any parcel is not labeled and also is not hazardous and also is registered, it also is refrigerated. Clause 2 overrides Clause 4. Clause 5 overrides Clause 6. Clause 13 overrides Clause 3. Clause 8 overrides Clause 7. Question: Which of these is true of Nandor?", "options": ["is palletized", "has a courier", "is prepaid", "is consolidated", "is labeled", "is stamped", "is misrouted"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is misrouted", "unit_id": "u019774", "pair_id": "u019774-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019774-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "dbde498e58205ce7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a6", "a1", "a19", "a8", "a10", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019774-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is registered. Nandor is not damaged. Nandor is not tracked. Nandor has a locker slot. Nandor has a waybill. Nandor is not hazardous. Nandor is delayed. Nandor has no barcode. Nandor is not weighed. Nandor is not rerouted. Nandor is perishable. Nandor is oversized.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is scanned, and has a waybill, and is fragile, that parcel is stamped. Item B. When the parcel is not undeliverable, that parcel is not misrouted. Item C. When the parcel is not weighed, that parcel is not refrigerated. Item D. When the parcel is scanned, and is not oversized, and is not damaged, that parcel is misrouted. Item E. When the parcel is scanned, and is rerouted, that parcel is prepaid. Item F. When the parcel has a barcode, that parcel is not prepaid. Item G. When the parcel is perishable, that parcel is scanned. Item H. When the parcel is delayed, and is tracked, that parcel is not scanned. Item I. When the parcel is scanned, and has no locker slot, and has a waybill, that parcel is consolidated. Item J. When the parcel is scanned, and has no waybill, that parcel is palletized. Item K. When the parcel is scanned, and is not undeliverable, and is hazardous, that parcel is labeled. Item L. When the parcel is scanned, and has a locker slot, and is oversized, that parcel has a courier. Item M. When the parcel is not labeled, and is not hazardous, and is registered, that parcel is refrigerated. Item B outranks Item D. Item E outranks Item F. Item M outranks Item C. Item H outranks Item G. Question: What applies to Nandor?", "options": ["is palletized", "has a courier", "is prepaid", "is consolidated", "is labeled", "is stamped", "is misrouted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a courier", "unit_id": "u019774", "pair_id": "u019774-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019774-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6def63c19ffff6d7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a6", "a1", "a19", "a8", "a10", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019774-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is registered. Nandor is not damaged. Nandor is not tracked. Nandor has a locker slot. Nandor has a waybill. Nandor is not hazardous. Nandor is delayed. Nandor has no barcode. Nandor is not weighed. Nandor is not rerouted. Nandor is perishable. Nandor is not oversized.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is scanned, and has a waybill, and is fragile, that parcel is stamped. Item B. When the parcel is not undeliverable, that parcel is not misrouted. Item C. When the parcel is not weighed, that parcel is not refrigerated. Item D. When the parcel is scanned, and is not oversized, and is not damaged, that parcel is misrouted. Item E. When the parcel is scanned, and is rerouted, that parcel is prepaid. Item F. When the parcel has a barcode, that parcel is not prepaid. Item G. When the parcel is perishable, that parcel is scanned. Item H. When the parcel is delayed, and is tracked, that parcel is not scanned. Item I. When the parcel is scanned, and has no locker slot, and has a waybill, that parcel is consolidated. Item J. When the parcel is scanned, and has no waybill, that parcel is palletized. Item K. When the parcel is scanned, and is not undeliverable, and is hazardous, that parcel is labeled. Item L. When the parcel is scanned, and has a locker slot, and is oversized, that parcel has a courier. Item M. When the parcel is not labeled, and is not hazardous, and is registered, that parcel is refrigerated. Item B outranks Item D. Item E outranks Item F. Item M outranks Item C. Item H outranks Item G. Question: What applies to Nandor?", "options": ["is palletized", "has a courier", "is prepaid", "is consolidated", "is labeled", "is stamped", "is misrouted"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is misrouted", "unit_id": "u019774", "pair_id": "u019774-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019774-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "dbde498e58205ce7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a6", "a1", "a19", "a8", "a10", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u019931-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has an adjuster. Fabian has a dashcam. Fabian is not bundled. Yara is not a smoker. Yara is not bundled. Zdenek has no dashcam. Yara has an adjuster. Zdenek has no adjuster.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam plus is bundled: then it has a beneficiary. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster: then it is lapsed. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam plus is not bundled: then it has no beneficiary. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has no adjuster plus is a smoker: then it is not lapsed. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. Question: Is it so that Yara has no beneficiary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019931", "pair_id": "u019931-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019931-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d3c578a8b0af1918", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019931-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has an adjuster. Fabian has a dashcam. Fabian is not bundled. Yara is not a smoker. Yara is not bundled. Zdenek has no dashcam. Yara has an adjuster. Zdenek has no adjuster. Yara has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam plus is bundled: then it has a beneficiary. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster: then it is lapsed. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam plus is not bundled: then it has no beneficiary. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has no adjuster plus is a smoker: then it is not lapsed. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. Question: Is it so that Yara has no beneficiary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019931", "pair_id": "u019931-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019931-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f97359f86b782f61", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019931-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has an adjuster. Fabian has a dashcam. Fabian is not bundled. Yara is not a smoker. Yara is not bundled. Zdenek has no dashcam. Yara has an adjuster. Zdenek has no adjuster.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has a dashcam and additionally is bundled, it then has a beneficiary. #2 Each time a policyholder has an adjuster, it then is lapsed. #3 Each time a policyholder has a dashcam and additionally is not bundled, it then has no beneficiary. #4 Each time a policyholder has no adjuster and additionally is a smoker, it then is not lapsed. #1 yields to #3. #2 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Yara has no beneficiary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019931", "pair_id": "u019931-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019931-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d3c578a8b0af1918", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019931-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has an adjuster. Fabian has a dashcam. Fabian is not bundled. Yara is not a smoker. Yara is not bundled. Zdenek has no dashcam. Yara has an adjuster. Zdenek has no adjuster. Yara has a dashcam.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has a dashcam and additionally is bundled, it then has a beneficiary. #2 Each time a policyholder has an adjuster, it then is lapsed. #3 Each time a policyholder has a dashcam and additionally is not bundled, it then has no beneficiary. #4 Each time a policyholder has no adjuster and additionally is a smoker, it then is not lapsed. #1 yields to #3. #2 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Yara has no beneficiary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019931", "pair_id": "u019931-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019931-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f97359f86b782f61", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019969-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not minified.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is reverted provided that it is not merged. Section 2: a build has a security advisory provided that it is benchmarked. Section 3: a build is not tested provided that it is minified. Section 4: a build is versioned provided that it is minified. Section 5: a build is not reverted provided that it is not tested. Section 6: a build is not merged provided that it is not localized. Question: Gneiss is reverted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019969", "pair_id": "u019969-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019969-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "45775e626f160ac2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019969-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not minified.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is reverted provided that it is not merged. Section 2: a build has a security advisory provided that it is benchmarked. Section 3: a build is not tested provided that it is minified. Section 4: a build is versioned provided that it is not minified. Section 5: a build is not reverted provided that it is not tested. Section 6: a build is not merged provided that it is not localized. Question: Gneiss is reverted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019969", "pair_id": "u019969-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019969-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "97383cdbcc40441a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019970-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian has a patch cycle of 11. Obsidian has a migration script. Obsidian has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is experimental, so it is not notarized. No. 2 While the given build is experimental, so it is notarized. No. 3 While the given build has no migration script, so it is not merged. No. 4 While the given build has a test yield not below 37, so it is obsolete. No. 5 While the given build has a feature toggle, so it is experimental. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build has no feature toggle. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given build has a patch cycle not below 29. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given build has a feature toggle. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given build has a defect tally not above 79. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build has a defect tally that falls below 61. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build has a defect tally not below 61. No. 1 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Obsidian is not notarized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019970", "pair_id": "u019970-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019970-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "52dd5203f2f41570", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019970-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian has a patch cycle of 11. Obsidian has a migration script. Obsidian has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is experimental, so it is not notarized. No. 2 While the given build is experimental, so it is notarized. No. 3 While the given build has a migration script, so it is not merged. No. 4 While the given build has a test yield not below 37, so it is obsolete. No. 5 While the given build has a feature toggle, so it is experimental. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build has no feature toggle. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given build has a patch cycle not below 29. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given build has a feature toggle. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given build has a defect tally not above 79. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build has a defect tally that falls below 61. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build has a defect tally not below 61. No. 1 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Obsidian is not notarized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u019970", "pair_id": "u019970-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u019970-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "73c2b738b4d14011", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019992-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a latency budget of 21. Zephyr is not sandboxed. Vesper has a latency budget of 94. Vesper has a CPU quota of 99. Vesper is not encrypted. Orrery has a CPU quota of 78. Zephyr has a CPU quota of 78. Orrery has no firewall. Vesper has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is throttled, then it is not autoscaled. (2) If a workload is throttled, then it is monitored. (3) If a workload is throttled, then it is autoscaled. (4) If a workload has a CPU quota of at least 83, then it is throttled. (5) If a workload is encrypted, then it is not deprecated. (6) If a workload has no firewall, then it is not throttled. (7) If a workload has a dedicated host, then it has a snapshot. (8) If a workload has a public endpoint, then it is not monitored. (3) is void if the workload is not sandboxed. (5) is void if the workload is sandboxed. (1) is void if the workload is sandboxed. (3) is void if the workload has a latency budget of at most 69. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. When (1) and (3) clash, (1) prevails. When (2) and (8) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Vesper is autoscaled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u019992", "pair_id": "u019992-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019992-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "55328290985d8ba2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019992-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a latency budget of 21. Vesper is sandboxed. Zephyr is not sandboxed. Vesper has a latency budget of 94. Vesper has a CPU quota of 99. Vesper is not encrypted. Orrery has a CPU quota of 78. Zephyr has a CPU quota of 78. Orrery has no firewall. Vesper has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is throttled, then it is not autoscaled. (2) If a workload is throttled, then it is monitored. (3) If a workload is throttled, then it is autoscaled. (4) If a workload has a CPU quota of at least 83, then it is throttled. (5) If a workload is encrypted, then it is not deprecated. (6) If a workload has no firewall, then it is not throttled. (7) If a workload has a dedicated host, then it has a snapshot. (8) If a workload has a public endpoint, then it is not monitored. (3) is void if the workload is not sandboxed. (5) is void if the workload is sandboxed. (1) is void if the workload is sandboxed. (3) is void if the workload has a latency budget of at most 69. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. When (1) and (3) clash, (1) prevails. When (2) and (8) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Vesper is autoscaled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019992", "pair_id": "u019992-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019992-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e8ffd0d21d356514", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019992-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a latency budget of 21. Zephyr is not sandboxed. Vesper has a latency budget of 94. Vesper has a CPU quota of 99. Vesper is not encrypted. Orrery has a CPU quota of 78. Zephyr has a CPU quota of 78. Orrery has no firewall. Vesper has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is throttled, it also is not autoscaled. Clause 2: once any workload is throttled, it also is monitored. Clause 3: once any workload is throttled, it also is autoscaled. Clause 4: once any workload has a CPU quota of 83 or more, it also is throttled. Clause 5: once any workload is encrypted, it also is not deprecated. Clause 6: once any workload has no firewall, it also is not throttled. Clause 7: once any workload has a dedicated host, it also has a snapshot. Clause 8: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is not monitored. Clause 3 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not sandboxed. Clause 5 does not hold for a workload when any workload is sandboxed. Clause 1 does not hold for a workload when any workload is sandboxed. Clause 3 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a latency budget of 69 or less. Clause 4 overrides Clause 6. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Clause 2 overrides Clause 8. Question: Does it follow that Vesper is autoscaled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u019992", "pair_id": "u019992-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019992-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "55328290985d8ba2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019992-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a latency budget of 21. Vesper is sandboxed. Zephyr is not sandboxed. Vesper has a latency budget of 94. Vesper has a CPU quota of 99. Vesper is not encrypted. Orrery has a CPU quota of 78. Zephyr has a CPU quota of 78. Orrery has no firewall. Vesper has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is throttled, it also is not autoscaled. Clause 2: once any workload is throttled, it also is monitored. Clause 3: once any workload is throttled, it also is autoscaled. Clause 4: once any workload has a CPU quota of 83 or more, it also is throttled. Clause 5: once any workload is encrypted, it also is not deprecated. Clause 6: once any workload has no firewall, it also is not throttled. Clause 7: once any workload has a dedicated host, it also has a snapshot. Clause 8: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is not monitored. Clause 3 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not sandboxed. Clause 5 does not hold for a workload when any workload is sandboxed. Clause 1 does not hold for a workload when any workload is sandboxed. Clause 3 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a latency budget of 69 or less. Clause 4 overrides Clause 6. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Clause 2 overrides Clause 8. Question: Does it follow that Vesper is autoscaled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019992", "pair_id": "u019992-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019992-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e8ffd0d21d356514", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019992-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a latency budget of 21. Zephyr is not sandboxed. Vesper has a latency budget of 94. Vesper has a CPU quota of 99. Vesper is not encrypted. Orrery has a CPU quota of 78. Zephyr has a CPU quota of 78. Orrery has no firewall. Vesper has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is throttled, that workload is not autoscaled. Item B. When the workload is throttled, that workload is monitored. Item C. When the workload is throttled, that workload is autoscaled. Item D. When the workload has a CPU quota of no less than 83, that workload is throttled. Item E. When the workload is encrypted, that workload is not deprecated. Item F. When the workload has no firewall, that workload is not throttled. Item G. When the workload has a dedicated host, that workload has a snapshot. Item H. When the workload has a public endpoint, that workload is not monitored. Item C is suspended when the workload is not sandboxed. Item E is suspended when the workload is sandboxed. Item A is suspended when the workload is sandboxed. Item C is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of no more than 69. Item D outranks Item F. Item A outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item H. Question: Can one infer that Vesper is autoscaled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u019992", "pair_id": "u019992-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019992-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "55328290985d8ba2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u019992-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a latency budget of 21. Vesper is sandboxed. Zephyr is not sandboxed. Vesper has a latency budget of 94. Vesper has a CPU quota of 99. Vesper is not encrypted. Orrery has a CPU quota of 78. Zephyr has a CPU quota of 78. Orrery has no firewall. Vesper has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is throttled, that workload is not autoscaled. Item B. When the workload is throttled, that workload is monitored. Item C. When the workload is throttled, that workload is autoscaled. Item D. When the workload has a CPU quota of no less than 83, that workload is throttled. Item E. When the workload is encrypted, that workload is not deprecated. Item F. When the workload has no firewall, that workload is not throttled. Item G. When the workload has a dedicated host, that workload has a snapshot. Item H. When the workload has a public endpoint, that workload is not monitored. Item C is suspended when the workload is not sandboxed. Item E is suspended when the workload is sandboxed. Item A is suspended when the workload is sandboxed. Item C is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of no more than 69. Item D outranks Item F. Item A outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item H. Question: Can one infer that Vesper is autoscaled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u019992", "pair_id": "u019992-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u019992-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e8ffd0d21d356514", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020003-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not experimental. Quartz is benchmarked. Gneiss is merged. Gneiss is not reverted. Shale is not reproducible. Quartz has no changelog. Gneiss is not flaky. Quartz is merged. Gneiss is not reproducible.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is benchmarked, then it has a feature toggle. (2) If a build is flaky and is reverted and is reproducible, then it has no feature toggle. (3) If a build has a changelog and is merged, then it is obsolete. (2) is void if the build is experimental. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Quartz is reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020003", "pair_id": "u020003-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020003-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e57165572b6c0d53", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020003-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is not experimental. Quartz is reverted. Quartz is benchmarked. Gneiss is merged. Gneiss is not reverted. Shale is not reproducible. Quartz has no changelog. Gneiss is not flaky. Quartz is merged. Gneiss is not reproducible.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is benchmarked, then it has a feature toggle. (2) If a build is flaky and is reverted and is reproducible, then it has no feature toggle. (3) If a build has a changelog and is merged, then it is obsolete. (2) is void if the build is experimental. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Quartz is reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020003", "pair_id": "u020003-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020003-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6381a07faf312dc8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020008-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is not tracked. Ulla is rerouted. Ulla has a delivery window of 16.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is sealed provided that it is consolidated. Section 2: a parcel is not consolidated provided that it has a delivery window exceeding 58. Section 3: a parcel is undeliverable provided that it has a barcode. Section 4: a parcel is fragile provided that it is palletized. Section 5: a parcel is palletized provided that it is perishable. Section 6: a parcel is not prepaid provided that it is tracked. Section 7: a parcel is not fragile provided that it is misrouted. Section 8: a parcel is stamped provided that it is weighed. Section 9: a parcel is hazardous provided that it is misrouted. Section 10: a parcel is consolidated provided that it has a weight class of 34 or lower. Section 11: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is rerouted. Section 12: a parcel is not sealed provided that it has a barcode. Section 13: a parcel is delayed provided that it is hazardous. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 12 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Which statement fits Ulla?", "options": ["is delayed", "is undeliverable", "is sealed", "is fragile"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is undeliverable", "unit_id": "u020008", "pair_id": "u020008-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020008-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "95126928dd29edaa", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a7", "a13", "a12"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020008-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is not tracked. Ulla is rerouted. Ulla has a delivery window of 16. Ulla has a weight class of 6.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is sealed provided that it is consolidated. Section 2: a parcel is not consolidated provided that it has a delivery window exceeding 58. Section 3: a parcel is undeliverable provided that it has a barcode. Section 4: a parcel is fragile provided that it is palletized. Section 5: a parcel is palletized provided that it is perishable. Section 6: a parcel is not prepaid provided that it is tracked. Section 7: a parcel is not fragile provided that it is misrouted. Section 8: a parcel is stamped provided that it is weighed. Section 9: a parcel is hazardous provided that it is misrouted. Section 10: a parcel is consolidated provided that it has a weight class of 34 or lower. Section 11: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is rerouted. Section 12: a parcel is not sealed provided that it has a barcode. Section 13: a parcel is delayed provided that it is hazardous. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 12 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Which statement fits Ulla?", "options": ["is delayed", "is undeliverable", "is sealed", "is fragile"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is undeliverable", "unit_id": "u020008", "pair_id": "u020008-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020008-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "938e130b3bd3d2f8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a7", "a13", "a12"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020008-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is not tracked. Ulla is rerouted. Ulla has a delivery window of 16.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is consolidated: then it is sealed. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window higher than 58: then it is not consolidated. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is undeliverable. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is palletized: then it is fragile. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is perishable: then it is palletized. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is not prepaid. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it is not fragile. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is weighed: then it is stamped. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it is hazardous. Policy X. Suppose that parcel has a weight class no higher than 34: then it is consolidated. Policy XI. Suppose that parcel is rerouted: then it has a barcode. Policy XII. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is not sealed. Policy XIII. Suppose that parcel is hazardous: then it is delayed. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy X. In a clash, Policy XII beats Policy I. Question: Which choice is right for Ulla?", "options": ["is delayed", "is undeliverable", "is sealed", "is fragile"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is undeliverable", "unit_id": "u020008", "pair_id": "u020008-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020008-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "95126928dd29edaa", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a7", "a13", "a12"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020008-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is not tracked. Ulla is rerouted. Ulla has a delivery window of 16. Ulla has a weight class of 6.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is consolidated: then it is sealed. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window higher than 58: then it is not consolidated. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is undeliverable. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is palletized: then it is fragile. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is perishable: then it is palletized. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is not prepaid. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it is not fragile. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is weighed: then it is stamped. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it is hazardous. Policy X. Suppose that parcel has a weight class no higher than 34: then it is consolidated. Policy XI. Suppose that parcel is rerouted: then it has a barcode. Policy XII. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is not sealed. Policy XIII. Suppose that parcel is hazardous: then it is delayed. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy X. In a clash, Policy XII beats Policy I. Question: Which choice is right for Ulla?", "options": ["is delayed", "is undeliverable", "is sealed", "is fragile"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is undeliverable", "unit_id": "u020008", "pair_id": "u020008-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020008-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "938e130b3bd3d2f8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a7", "a13", "a12"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020008-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is not tracked. Ulla is rerouted. Ulla has a delivery window of 16.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is consolidated, it then is sealed. #2 Each time a parcel has a delivery window greater than 58, it then is not consolidated. #3 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is undeliverable. #4 Each time a parcel is palletized, it then is fragile. #5 Each time a parcel is perishable, it then is palletized. #6 Each time a parcel is tracked, it then is not prepaid. #7 Each time a parcel is misrouted, it then is not fragile. #8 Each time a parcel is weighed, it then is stamped. #9 Each time a parcel is misrouted, it then is hazardous. #10 Each time a parcel has a weight class of 34 or below, it then is consolidated. #11 Each time a parcel is rerouted, it then has a barcode. #12 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is not sealed. #13 Each time a parcel is hazardous, it then is delayed. #4 yields to #7. #10 yields to #2. #1 yields to #12. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Ulla?", "options": ["is delayed", "is undeliverable", "is sealed", "is fragile"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is undeliverable", "unit_id": "u020008", "pair_id": "u020008-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020008-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "95126928dd29edaa", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a7", "a13", "a12"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020008-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is not tracked. Ulla is rerouted. Ulla has a delivery window of 16. Ulla has a weight class of 6.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is consolidated, it then is sealed. #2 Each time a parcel has a delivery window greater than 58, it then is not consolidated. #3 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is undeliverable. #4 Each time a parcel is palletized, it then is fragile. #5 Each time a parcel is perishable, it then is palletized. #6 Each time a parcel is tracked, it then is not prepaid. #7 Each time a parcel is misrouted, it then is not fragile. #8 Each time a parcel is weighed, it then is stamped. #9 Each time a parcel is misrouted, it then is hazardous. #10 Each time a parcel has a weight class of 34 or below, it then is consolidated. #11 Each time a parcel is rerouted, it then has a barcode. #12 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is not sealed. #13 Each time a parcel is hazardous, it then is delayed. #4 yields to #7. #10 yields to #2. #1 yields to #12. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Ulla?", "options": ["is delayed", "is undeliverable", "is sealed", "is fragile"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is undeliverable", "unit_id": "u020008", "pair_id": "u020008-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020008-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "938e130b3bd3d2f8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a7", "a13", "a12"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020011-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is interviewed. Olek is eligible. Ivo has no signing bonus. Olek has no signing bonus. Olek has a notice period of 6.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is interviewed, then it is sponsored. (2) If a candidate is relocating, then it has a portfolio. (3) If a candidate is relocating, then it has no portfolio. (4) If a candidate is sponsored, then it is relocating. (5) If a candidate is eligible, then it is recommended. (2) is void if the candidate has a notice period of at least 6. (4) is void if the candidate has a signing bonus. (3) is void if the candidate has a notice period below 16. (5) is void if the candidate has a notice period of at most 86. Question: Is it true that Olek has no portfolio?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020011", "pair_id": "u020011-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020011-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7dfe5717221d33e4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020011-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is interviewed. Olek is eligible. Ivo has no signing bonus. Olek has no signing bonus. Olek has a notice period of 6.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is interviewed, then it is sponsored. (2) If a candidate is relocating, then it has a portfolio. (3) If a candidate is relocating, then it has no portfolio. (4) If a candidate is sponsored, then it is relocating. (5) If a candidate is eligible, then it is recommended. (2) is void if the candidate has a notice period of at least 16. (4) is void if the candidate has a signing bonus. (3) is void if the candidate has a notice period below 16. (5) is void if the candidate has a notice period of at most 86. Question: Is it true that Olek has no portfolio?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020011", "pair_id": "u020011-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020011-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "271cfaaca3cba490", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020011-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is interviewed. Olek is eligible. Ivo has no signing bonus. Olek has no signing bonus. Olek has a notice period of 6.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is interviewed, it also is sponsored. Clause 2: once any candidate is relocating, it also has a portfolio. Clause 3: once any candidate is relocating, it also has no portfolio. Clause 4: once any candidate is sponsored, it also is relocating. Clause 5: once any candidate is eligible, it also is recommended. Clause 2 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has a notice period of 6 or more. Clause 4 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has a signing bonus. Clause 3 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has a notice period under 16. Clause 5 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has a notice period of 86 or less. Question: Does it follow that Olek has no portfolio?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020011", "pair_id": "u020011-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020011-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7dfe5717221d33e4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020011-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is interviewed. Olek is eligible. Ivo has no signing bonus. Olek has no signing bonus. Olek has a notice period of 6.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is interviewed, it also is sponsored. Clause 2: once any candidate is relocating, it also has a portfolio. Clause 3: once any candidate is relocating, it also has no portfolio. Clause 4: once any candidate is sponsored, it also is relocating. Clause 5: once any candidate is eligible, it also is recommended. Clause 2 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has a notice period of 16 or more. Clause 4 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has a signing bonus. Clause 3 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has a notice period under 16. Clause 5 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has a notice period of 86 or less. Question: Does it follow that Olek has no portfolio?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020011", "pair_id": "u020011-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020011-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "271cfaaca3cba490", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020011-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is interviewed. Olek is eligible. Ivo has no signing bonus. Olek has no signing bonus. Olek has a notice period of 6.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is interviewed, that candidate is sponsored. Item B. When the candidate is relocating, that candidate has a portfolio. Item C. When the candidate is relocating, that candidate has no portfolio. Item D. When the candidate is sponsored, that candidate is relocating. Item E. When the candidate is eligible, that candidate is recommended. Item B is suspended when the candidate has a notice period of no less than 6. Item D is suspended when the candidate has a signing bonus. Item C is suspended when the candidate has a notice period of less than 16. Item E is suspended when the candidate has a notice period of no more than 86. Question: Can one infer that Olek has no portfolio?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020011", "pair_id": "u020011-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020011-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7dfe5717221d33e4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020011-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is interviewed. Olek is eligible. Ivo has no signing bonus. Olek has no signing bonus. Olek has a notice period of 6.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is interviewed, that candidate is sponsored. Item B. When the candidate is relocating, that candidate has a portfolio. Item C. When the candidate is relocating, that candidate has no portfolio. Item D. When the candidate is sponsored, that candidate is relocating. Item E. When the candidate is eligible, that candidate is recommended. Item B is suspended when the candidate has a notice period of no less than 16. Item D is suspended when the candidate has a signing bonus. Item C is suspended when the candidate has a notice period of less than 16. Item E is suspended when the candidate has a notice period of no more than 86. Question: Can one infer that Olek has no portfolio?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020011", "pair_id": "u020011-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020011-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "271cfaaca3cba490", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020035-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin has a waybill. Quentin is stamped. Quentin has a courier. Quentin is rerouted. Mirela is registered. Quentin is not labeled. Ulla is registered. Quentin is not misrouted. Quentin is not registered. Quentin has a weight class of 35. Mirela has a weight class of 53. Mirela is not consolidated. Ulla has no waybill. Ulla is not labeled. Ulla is not consolidated. Mirela has no waybill.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is scanned and likewise is not misrouted, so it is tracked. No. 2 While the given parcel is scanned and likewise is not labeled and likewise has a weight class that falls below 18, so it is refrigerated. No. 3 While the given parcel has a courier, so it has a barcode. No. 4 While the given parcel is not registered and likewise has no courier and likewise is consolidated, so it is weighed. No. 5 While the given parcel is scanned and likewise is misrouted and likewise has a barcode, so it is palletized. No. 6 While the given parcel is scanned and likewise is labeled and likewise is weighed, so it is undeliverable. No. 7 While the given parcel is not stamped, so it is fragile. No. 8 While the given parcel has a waybill and likewise is rerouted, so it has a locker slot. No. 9 While the given parcel has a locker slot and likewise has a waybill, so it is scanned. Question: Select what holds for Quentin: which option?", "options": ["is palletized", "is undeliverable", "is refrigerated", "is tracked"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u020035", "pair_id": "u020035-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020035-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a56da4fbbb348b9a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a13", "a11", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020035-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin has a waybill. Quentin is stamped. Quentin has a courier. Quentin is rerouted. Mirela is registered. Quentin is not labeled. Ulla is registered. Quentin is misrouted. Quentin is not registered. Quentin has a weight class of 35. Mirela has a weight class of 53. Mirela is not consolidated. Ulla has no waybill. Ulla is not labeled. Ulla is not consolidated. Mirela has no waybill.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is scanned and likewise is not misrouted, so it is tracked. No. 2 While the given parcel is scanned and likewise is not labeled and likewise has a weight class that falls below 18, so it is refrigerated. No. 3 While the given parcel has a courier, so it has a barcode. No. 4 While the given parcel is not registered and likewise has no courier and likewise is consolidated, so it is weighed. No. 5 While the given parcel is scanned and likewise is misrouted and likewise has a barcode, so it is palletized. No. 6 While the given parcel is scanned and likewise is labeled and likewise is weighed, so it is undeliverable. No. 7 While the given parcel is not stamped, so it is fragile. No. 8 While the given parcel has a waybill and likewise is rerouted, so it has a locker slot. No. 9 While the given parcel has a locker slot and likewise has a waybill, so it is scanned. Question: Select what holds for Quentin: which option?", "options": ["is palletized", "is undeliverable", "is refrigerated", "is tracked"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is palletized", "unit_id": "u020035", "pair_id": "u020035-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020035-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "c870afe64f448831", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a13", "a11", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020036-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mica is not tagged. Zircon is not localized. Mica is not backported. Galena is reproducible. Pumice is tested. Zircon is versioned. Galena is not merged. Galena is versioned. Zircon is not tested. Zircon has a security advisory. Mica is merged. Zircon is not backported. Galena is tagged. Mica is not tested. Mica is localized. Galena has a security advisory. Zircon is minified. Galena is not tested.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is tagged: then it is signed. Policy II. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it is benchmarked. Policy III. Suppose that build is tested: then it is not flaky. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a security advisory: then it is profiled. Policy V. Suppose that build is not merged: then it is experimental. Policy VI. Suppose that build is localized: then it is fuzzed. Policy VII. Suppose that build is backported: then it is obsolete. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is localized: then it is linted. Policy IX. Suppose that build is not localized: then it has a migration script. Policy X. Suppose that build has no changelog: then it is compiled. Policy VIII is waived if that build is not reproducible. Policy II is waived if that build is not versioned. Policy IV is waived if that build is minified. Policy VII is waived if that build has a security advisory. Policy I is waived if that build is backported. Policy X is waived if that build is not merged. Question: Which choice is right for Zircon?", "options": ["is fuzzed", "is experimental", "is compiled", "is profiled", "is signed", "has a migration script", "is obsolete"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a migration script", "unit_id": "u020036", "pair_id": "u020036-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020036-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "15cb6aa8ec8571ab", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a16", "a9", "a17", "a15", "a18", "a13", "a7"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020036-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mica is not tagged. Zircon is not localized. Mica is not backported. Galena is reproducible. Pumice is tested. Zircon is versioned. Galena is not merged. Galena is versioned. Zircon is tested. Zircon has a security advisory. Mica is merged. Zircon is not backported. Galena is tagged. Mica is not tested. Mica is localized. Galena has a security advisory. Zircon is minified. Galena is not tested.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is tagged: then it is signed. Policy II. Suppose that build is reproducible: then it is benchmarked. Policy III. Suppose that build is tested: then it is not flaky. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a security advisory: then it is profiled. Policy V. Suppose that build is not merged: then it is experimental. Policy VI. Suppose that build is localized: then it is fuzzed. Policy VII. Suppose that build is backported: then it is obsolete. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is localized: then it is linted. Policy IX. Suppose that build is not localized: then it has a migration script. Policy X. Suppose that build has no changelog: then it is compiled. Policy VIII is waived if that build is not reproducible. Policy II is waived if that build is not versioned. Policy IV is waived if that build is minified. Policy VII is waived if that build has a security advisory. Policy I is waived if that build is backported. Policy X is waived if that build is not merged. Question: Which choice is right for Zircon?", "options": ["is fuzzed", "is experimental", "is compiled", "is profiled", "is signed", "has a migration script", "is obsolete"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a migration script", "unit_id": "u020036", "pair_id": "u020036-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020036-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "01ddcd68cb50cf82", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a16", "a9", "a17", "a15", "a18", "a13", "a7"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020083-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not benchmarked. Schist has a migration script. Pumice has no feature toggle. Schist has no feature toggle. Schist is experimental. Pumice is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is not benchmarked, that build is documented. Item B. When the build has no feature toggle, and has a migration script, and is experimental, that build is profiled. Item C. When the build has no feature toggle, and has a migration script, that build is not profiled. Item D. When the build has no feature toggle, that build is not documented. Item D outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Schist is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020083", "pair_id": "u020083-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020083-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cb4f1e1f5c5a6454", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020083-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not benchmarked. Schist has a migration script. Pumice has no feature toggle. Schist has no feature toggle. Schist is experimental. Pumice is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is not benchmarked, that build is documented. Item B. When the build has no feature toggle, and has a migration script, and is experimental, that build is profiled. Item C. When the build has no feature toggle, and has no migration script, that build is not profiled. Item D. When the build has no feature toggle, that build is not documented. Item D outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Schist is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020083", "pair_id": "u020083-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020083-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e16a88866df650cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020085-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena has no migration script. Galena is not notarized. Galena is not localized. Galena is documented. Galena is not tested. Galena is tagged. Basalt is not minified. Galena is linted. Basalt is obsolete. Basalt is not tested. Basalt is not fuzzed. Galena is obsolete.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is flaky, and is localized, and is not documented, that build is not merged. Item B. When the build is documented, that build has a changelog. Item C. When the build has no migration script, and is fuzzed, that build has no feature toggle. Item D. When the build is localized, that build has a feature toggle. Item E. When the build is documented, and is not notarized, that build is flaky. Item F. When the build is merged, and is not notarized, and is tagged, that build is compiled. Item G. When the build is merged, and is notarized, and is tested, that build is not compiled. Item H. When the build has a changelog, that build is merged. Item C is suspended when the build is obsolete. Item B is suspended when the build is documented, and is minified. Item F outranks Item G. Item H outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Galena is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020085", "pair_id": "u020085-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020085-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "97749256030420eb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020085-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena has no migration script. Galena is not notarized. Galena is not localized. Galena is documented. Galena is not tested. Galena is tagged. Basalt is not minified. Galena is linted. Basalt is obsolete. Basalt is not tested. Basalt is not fuzzed. Galena is obsolete.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is flaky, and is localized, and is not documented, that build is not merged. Item B. When the build is documented, that build has a changelog. Item C. When the build has no migration script, and is fuzzed, that build has no feature toggle. Item D. When the build is localized, that build has a feature toggle. Item E. When the build is documented, and is notarized, that build is flaky. Item F. When the build is merged, and is not notarized, and is tagged, that build is compiled. Item G. When the build is merged, and is notarized, and is tested, that build is not compiled. Item H. When the build has a changelog, that build is merged. Item C is suspended when the build is obsolete. Item B is suspended when the build is documented, and is minified. Item F outranks Item G. Item H outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Galena is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020085", "pair_id": "u020085-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020085-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5414f89816733f91", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020092-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not certified. Olek is not a veteran. Olek is not freelance. Lotte is onboarded. Kalle is interviewed. Lotte is freelance. Kalle is not fingerprinted. Lotte has a background screening. Lotte is a veteran. Lotte is relocating. Olek is relocating. Lotte is not fingerprinted. Olek is sponsored. Olek has a signing bonus. Lotte is not sponsored. Kalle has no background screening. Lotte is interviewed. Kalle is relocating.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is a graduate, and is certified, and is a veteran, that candidate is licensed. Item B. When the candidate is a graduate, and is relocating, that candidate is not licensed. Item C. When the candidate is certified, and is sponsored, that candidate is probationary. Item D. When the candidate is probationary, that candidate is not a graduate. Item E. When the candidate is bonded, and is certified, and is onboarded, that candidate is a graduate. Item F. When the candidate is certified, and is interviewed, and is onboarded, that candidate is bonded. Item G. When the candidate is freelance, and has a background screening, that candidate is not headhunted. Item F is suspended when the candidate is fingerprinted, and has a signing bonus. Item D outranks Item E. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Lotte is licensed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020092", "pair_id": "u020092-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020092-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5fdabd0f15cef407", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a13", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020092-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not certified. Olek is not a veteran. Olek is not freelance. Lotte is onboarded. Kalle is interviewed. Lotte is freelance. Kalle is not fingerprinted. Lotte has no background screening. Lotte is a veteran. Lotte is relocating. Olek is relocating. Lotte is not fingerprinted. Olek is sponsored. Olek has a signing bonus. Lotte is not sponsored. Kalle has no background screening. Lotte is interviewed. Kalle is relocating.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is a graduate, and is certified, and is a veteran, that candidate is licensed. Item B. When the candidate is a graduate, and is relocating, that candidate is not licensed. Item C. When the candidate is certified, and is sponsored, that candidate is probationary. Item D. When the candidate is probationary, that candidate is not a graduate. Item E. When the candidate is bonded, and is certified, and is onboarded, that candidate is a graduate. Item F. When the candidate is certified, and is interviewed, and is onboarded, that candidate is bonded. Item G. When the candidate is freelance, and has a background screening, that candidate is not headhunted. Item F is suspended when the candidate is fingerprinted, and has a signing bonus. Item D outranks Item E. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Lotte is licensed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020092", "pair_id": "u020092-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020092-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "80e8028322cf0785", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a13", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020201-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh has a delivery window of 71. Liesel is palletized. Kaveh is not palletized. Liesel is not stamped. Mirela is not stamped. Quentin has a delivery window of 95.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not stamped, it thereby is delayed. Point B. If said parcel has a delivery window of minimum 27, it thereby is not delayed. Point B is cancelled if said parcel is not palletized. Point A supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Quentin has a waybill. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020201", "pair_id": "u020201-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020201-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b059623b66b520ca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020201-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh has a delivery window of 71. Quentin is not stamped. Liesel is palletized. Kaveh is not palletized. Liesel is not stamped. Mirela is not stamped. Quentin has a delivery window of 95.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not stamped, it thereby is delayed. Point B. If said parcel has a delivery window of minimum 27, it thereby is not delayed. Point B is cancelled if said parcel is not palletized. Point A supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Quentin has a waybill. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020201", "pair_id": "u020201-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020201-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8a76ea66d0cc8bc1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020206-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is exploratory. Electra has a milestone total of 91. Nashira is not cofunded. Electra has a review mark of 35. Electra is cofunded. Nashira has a milestone total of 43. Nashira has a review mark of 29.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is theoretical, thus it is not translational. Provision 2: when the proposal here is exploratory, thus it has industry backing. Provision 3: when the proposal here has a review mark beneath 77, thus it is theoretical. Provision 4: when the proposal here is theoretical, thus it is translational. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here has a milestone total at or above 14. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here has a milestone total beyond 43. Provision 3 has no effect when the proposal here is cofunded. Provision 1 has no effect when the proposal here has a milestone total beneath 14. Question: Would it be right to say that Nashira is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020206", "pair_id": "u020206-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020206-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "13f79e110b4bf83f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u020206-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is exploratory. Electra has a milestone total of 91. Nashira is not cofunded. Electra has a review mark of 35. Electra is cofunded. Nashira has a milestone total of 13. Nashira has a review mark of 29.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is theoretical, thus it is not translational. Provision 2: when the proposal here is exploratory, thus it has industry backing. Provision 3: when the proposal here has a review mark beneath 77, thus it is theoretical. Provision 4: when the proposal here is theoretical, thus it is translational. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here has a milestone total at or above 14. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here has a milestone total beyond 43. Provision 3 has no effect when the proposal here is cofunded. Provision 1 has no effect when the proposal here has a milestone total beneath 14. Question: Would it be right to say that Nashira is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020206", "pair_id": "u020206-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020206-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "595d8ac9010c14fd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u020238-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Borealis has a memory allotment of 25. Borealis is deprecated. Borealis is not sandboxed. Halcyon has a failover node. Borealis is cached. Borealis has a failover node. Borealis has a public endpoint. Halcyon is cached.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is idle provided that it has a firewall. Section 2: a workload is backed up provided that it is mirrored as well as is idle as well as has a public endpoint. Section 3: a workload has a GPU provided that it is mirrored as well as has a CPU quota of 25 or lower. Section 4: a workload is virtualized provided that it is mirrored as well as has a memory allotment of 26 or higher. Section 5: a workload is monitored provided that it is cached. Section 6: a workload is throttled provided that it is mirrored as well as has a memory allotment lower than 26 as well as has a public endpoint. Section 7: a workload is replicated provided that it is mirrored as well as has a replica count exceeding 82 as well as has a firewall. Section 8: a workload is mirrored provided that it has a failover node as well as is deprecated. Section 9: a workload has no GPU provided that it is idle. Section 4 lapses for a workload if it is sandboxed. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Which statement fits Borealis?", "options": ["is throttled", "is backed up", "has a GPU", "is replicated", "is virtualized"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is throttled", "unit_id": "u020238", "pair_id": "u020238-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020238-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "95c2bd1ea60965bc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a12", "a13", "a7", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020238-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Borealis has a memory allotment of 0. Borealis is deprecated. Borealis is not sandboxed. Halcyon has a failover node. Borealis is cached. Borealis has a failover node. Borealis has a public endpoint. Halcyon is cached.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is idle provided that it has a firewall. Section 2: a workload is backed up provided that it is mirrored as well as is idle as well as has a public endpoint. Section 3: a workload has a GPU provided that it is mirrored as well as has a CPU quota of 25 or lower. Section 4: a workload is virtualized provided that it is mirrored as well as has a memory allotment of 26 or higher. Section 5: a workload is monitored provided that it is cached. Section 6: a workload is throttled provided that it is mirrored as well as has a memory allotment lower than 26 as well as has a public endpoint. Section 7: a workload is replicated provided that it is mirrored as well as has a replica count exceeding 82 as well as has a firewall. Section 8: a workload is mirrored provided that it has a failover node as well as is deprecated. Section 9: a workload has no GPU provided that it is idle. Section 4 lapses for a workload if it is sandboxed. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Which statement fits Borealis?", "options": ["is throttled", "is backed up", "has a GPU", "is replicated", "is virtualized"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is throttled", "unit_id": "u020238", "pair_id": "u020238-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020238-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4161697c96198f0e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a12", "a13", "a7", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020238-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Borealis has a memory allotment of 25. Borealis is deprecated. Borealis is not sandboxed. Halcyon has a failover node. Borealis is cached. Borealis has a failover node. Borealis has a public endpoint. Halcyon is cached.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload has a firewall, it then is idle. #2 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally is idle and additionally has a public endpoint, it then is backed up. #3 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally has a CPU quota of 25 or below, it then has a GPU. #4 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally has a memory allotment of 26 or above, it then is virtualized. #5 Each time a workload is cached, it then is monitored. #6 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally has a memory allotment less than 26 and additionally has a public endpoint, it then is throttled. #7 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally has a replica count greater than 82 and additionally has a firewall, it then is replicated. #8 Each time a workload has a failover node and additionally is deprecated, it then is mirrored. #9 Each time a workload is idle, it then has no GPU. #4 is set aside if a workload is sandboxed. #3 yields to #9. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Borealis?", "options": ["is throttled", "is backed up", "has a GPU", "is replicated", "is virtualized"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is throttled", "unit_id": "u020238", "pair_id": "u020238-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020238-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "95c2bd1ea60965bc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a12", "a13", "a7", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020238-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Borealis has a memory allotment of 0. Borealis is deprecated. Borealis is not sandboxed. Halcyon has a failover node. Borealis is cached. Borealis has a failover node. Borealis has a public endpoint. Halcyon is cached.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload has a firewall, it then is idle. #2 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally is idle and additionally has a public endpoint, it then is backed up. #3 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally has a CPU quota of 25 or below, it then has a GPU. #4 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally has a memory allotment of 26 or above, it then is virtualized. #5 Each time a workload is cached, it then is monitored. #6 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally has a memory allotment less than 26 and additionally has a public endpoint, it then is throttled. #7 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally has a replica count greater than 82 and additionally has a firewall, it then is replicated. #8 Each time a workload has a failover node and additionally is deprecated, it then is mirrored. #9 Each time a workload is idle, it then has no GPU. #4 is set aside if a workload is sandboxed. #3 yields to #9. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Borealis?", "options": ["is throttled", "is backed up", "has a GPU", "is replicated", "is virtualized"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is throttled", "unit_id": "u020238", "pair_id": "u020238-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020238-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4161697c96198f0e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a12", "a13", "a7", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020255-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper is backed up. Vesper is virtualized. Vesper is not containerized. Vesper has no GPU. Vesper has no public endpoint. Vesper is not sharded.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is patched, it then has a snapshot. #2 Each time a workload is backed up and additionally has a GPU and additionally is sandboxed, it then is cached. #3 Each time a workload has a public endpoint, it then is autoscaled. #4 Each time a workload has no dedicated host and additionally is sharded, it then is not patched. #5 Each time a workload is not virtualized, it then has a dedicated host. #6 Each time a workload has no GPU, it then has no dedicated host. #7 Each time a workload is containerized, it then is not autoscaled. #8 Each time a workload has no dedicated host and additionally is not sharded, it then is patched. #8 yields to #4. #5 yields to #6. #3 yields to #7. Question: Do the terms above show that Vesper is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020255", "pair_id": "u020255-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020255-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a57f9f206aa9edf1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020255-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper is backed up. Vesper is virtualized. Vesper is not containerized. Vesper has no GPU. Vesper has no public endpoint. Vesper is sharded.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is patched, it then has a snapshot. #2 Each time a workload is backed up and additionally has a GPU and additionally is sandboxed, it then is cached. #3 Each time a workload has a public endpoint, it then is autoscaled. #4 Each time a workload has no dedicated host and additionally is sharded, it then is not patched. #5 Each time a workload is not virtualized, it then has a dedicated host. #6 Each time a workload has no GPU, it then has no dedicated host. #7 Each time a workload is containerized, it then is not autoscaled. #8 Each time a workload has no dedicated host and additionally is not sharded, it then is patched. #8 yields to #4. #5 yields to #6. #3 yields to #7. Question: Do the terms above show that Vesper is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020255", "pair_id": "u020255-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020255-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f73851a7bda8ea69", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020300-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is not labeled. Jory is scanned. Jory is prepaid. Jory is weighed. Jory has no locker slot. Jory is damaged. Jory is delayed. Jory is not fragile. Jory is sealed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is not palletized and additionally is damaged and additionally is not weighed, it then is not misrouted. #2 Each time a parcel is delayed and additionally has no courier and additionally is weighed, it then has a barcode. #3 Each time a parcel is not prepaid, it then is not stamped. #4 Each time a parcel is delayed and additionally is sealed and additionally is scanned, it then has a waybill. #5 Each time a parcel is damaged and additionally has no courier, it then is not refrigerated. #6 Each time a parcel is oversized, it then is not registered. #7 Each time a parcel has a courier, it then is refrigerated. #8 Each time a parcel is delayed and additionally has a courier, it then is rerouted. #9 Each time a parcel is delayed and additionally is not prepaid, it then is registered. #10 Each time a parcel is delayed and additionally has a locker slot and additionally is labeled, it then is stamped. #11 Each time a parcel is delayed and additionally is not fragile and additionally is prepaid, it then is undeliverable. #5 is set aside if a parcel has a courier. #9 is set aside if a parcel is not sealed. #4 is set aside if a parcel is not fragile. #6 yields to #9. #10 yields to #3. #7 yields to #5. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Jory?", "options": ["is registered", "is stamped", "is rerouted", "is undeliverable", "has a barcode", "has a waybill"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is undeliverable", "unit_id": "u020300", "pair_id": "u020300-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020300-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cc508ece1fa034e5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a11", "a9", "a12", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020300-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is not labeled. Jory is scanned. Jory is prepaid. Jory is oversized. Jory is weighed. Jory has no locker slot. Jory is damaged. Jory is delayed. Jory is not fragile. Jory is sealed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is not palletized and additionally is damaged and additionally is not weighed, it then is not misrouted. #2 Each time a parcel is delayed and additionally has no courier and additionally is weighed, it then has a barcode. #3 Each time a parcel is not prepaid, it then is not stamped. #4 Each time a parcel is delayed and additionally is sealed and additionally is scanned, it then has a waybill. #5 Each time a parcel is damaged and additionally has no courier, it then is not refrigerated. #6 Each time a parcel is oversized, it then is not registered. #7 Each time a parcel has a courier, it then is refrigerated. #8 Each time a parcel is delayed and additionally has a courier, it then is rerouted. #9 Each time a parcel is delayed and additionally is not prepaid, it then is registered. #10 Each time a parcel is delayed and additionally has a locker slot and additionally is labeled, it then is stamped. #11 Each time a parcel is delayed and additionally is not fragile and additionally is prepaid, it then is undeliverable. #5 is set aside if a parcel has a courier. #9 is set aside if a parcel is not sealed. #4 is set aside if a parcel is not fragile. #6 yields to #9. #10 yields to #3. #7 yields to #5. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Jory?", "options": ["is registered", "is stamped", "is rerouted", "is undeliverable", "has a barcode", "has a waybill"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is undeliverable", "unit_id": "u020300", "pair_id": "u020300-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020300-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0189bb230fb14d22", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a11", "a9", "a12", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020303-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Priya is not misrouted. Priya is not registered. Ulla is scanned. Ulla is not delayed. Jory is perishable. Priya is not delayed. Jory is not delayed. Ulla is not registered. Priya is weighed. Jory is misrouted. Ulla is damaged. Ulla is fragile. Ulla is misrouted. Ulla has a waybill. Ulla is refrigerated. Jory is registered. Priya is scanned. Jory is oversized. Priya is not labeled. Jory is labeled. Ulla is oversized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is refrigerated while is oversized while is scanned, thus it is prepaid. Provision 2: when the parcel here is oversized, thus it is not tracked. Provision 3: when the parcel here is delayed while is misrouted, thus it has a courier. Provision 4: when the parcel here is refrigerated while is damaged while is perishable, thus it is rerouted. Provision 5: when the parcel here is refrigerated while has a waybill while is misrouted, thus it is tracked. Provision 6: when the parcel here is weighed, thus it is not stamped. Provision 7: when the parcel here is refrigerated while is misrouted while is labeled, thus it is stamped. Provision 8: when the parcel here is refrigerated while is weighed while is fragile, thus it is consolidated. Provision 9: when the parcel here is registered, thus it is not rerouted. Provision 10: when the parcel here is refrigerated while is registered while is scanned, thus it is undeliverable. Provision 11: when the parcel here is refrigerated while is perishable, thus it is sealed. Provision 12: when the parcel here is hazardous, thus it is not tracked. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 12 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Which one describes Ulla?", "options": ["is consolidated", "is undeliverable", "is rerouted", "is prepaid", "is sealed", "is stamped", "is tracked"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prepaid", "unit_id": "u020303", "pair_id": "u020303-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/20/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020303-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2246a13bcb0000d0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a18", "a3", "a6", "a8", "a12", "a16"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020303-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Priya is not misrouted. Priya is not registered. Ulla is scanned. Ulla is not delayed. Jory is perishable. Priya is not delayed. Jory is not delayed. Ulla is not registered. Priya is weighed. Jory is misrouted. Ulla is damaged. Ulla is fragile. Ulla is misrouted. Ulla has a waybill. Ulla is refrigerated. Jory is registered. Priya is scanned. Jory is oversized. Priya is not labeled. Jory is labeled. Ulla is not oversized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is refrigerated while is oversized while is scanned, thus it is prepaid. Provision 2: when the parcel here is oversized, thus it is not tracked. Provision 3: when the parcel here is delayed while is misrouted, thus it has a courier. Provision 4: when the parcel here is refrigerated while is damaged while is perishable, thus it is rerouted. Provision 5: when the parcel here is refrigerated while has a waybill while is misrouted, thus it is tracked. Provision 6: when the parcel here is weighed, thus it is not stamped. Provision 7: when the parcel here is refrigerated while is misrouted while is labeled, thus it is stamped. Provision 8: when the parcel here is refrigerated while is weighed while is fragile, thus it is consolidated. Provision 9: when the parcel here is registered, thus it is not rerouted. Provision 10: when the parcel here is refrigerated while is registered while is scanned, thus it is undeliverable. Provision 11: when the parcel here is refrigerated while is perishable, thus it is sealed. Provision 12: when the parcel here is hazardous, thus it is not tracked. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 12 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Which one describes Ulla?", "options": ["is consolidated", "is undeliverable", "is rerouted", "is prepaid", "is sealed", "is stamped", "is tracked"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u020303", "pair_id": "u020303-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/20/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020303-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3baea661e60529c9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a18", "a3", "a6", "a8", "a12", "a16"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020303-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Priya is not misrouted. Priya is not registered. Ulla is scanned. Ulla is not delayed. Jory is perishable. Priya is not delayed. Jory is not delayed. Ulla is not registered. Priya is weighed. Jory is misrouted. Ulla is damaged. Ulla is fragile. Ulla is misrouted. Ulla has a waybill. Ulla is refrigerated. Jory is registered. Priya is scanned. Jory is oversized. Priya is not labeled. Jory is labeled. Ulla is oversized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is refrigerated and further is oversized and further is scanned, it thereby is prepaid. Point B. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby is not tracked. Point C. If said parcel is delayed and further is misrouted, it thereby has a courier. Point D. If said parcel is refrigerated and further is damaged and further is perishable, it thereby is rerouted. Point E. If said parcel is refrigerated and further has a waybill and further is misrouted, it thereby is tracked. Point F. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby is not stamped. Point G. If said parcel is refrigerated and further is misrouted and further is labeled, it thereby is stamped. Point H. If said parcel is refrigerated and further is weighed and further is fragile, it thereby is consolidated. Point I. If said parcel is registered, it thereby is not rerouted. Point J. If said parcel is refrigerated and further is registered and further is scanned, it thereby is undeliverable. Point K. If said parcel is refrigerated and further is perishable, it thereby is sealed. Point L. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby is not tracked. Point I supersedes Point D. Point B supersedes Point E. Point F supersedes Point G. Point L supersedes Point E. Question: Which choice is true for Ulla?", "options": ["is consolidated", "is undeliverable", "is rerouted", "is prepaid", "is sealed", "is stamped", "is tracked"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prepaid", "unit_id": "u020303", "pair_id": "u020303-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/20/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020303-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2246a13bcb0000d0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a18", "a3", "a6", "a8", "a12", "a16"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020303-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Priya is not misrouted. Priya is not registered. Ulla is scanned. Ulla is not delayed. Jory is perishable. Priya is not delayed. Jory is not delayed. Ulla is not registered. Priya is weighed. Jory is misrouted. Ulla is damaged. Ulla is fragile. Ulla is misrouted. Ulla has a waybill. Ulla is refrigerated. Jory is registered. Priya is scanned. Jory is oversized. Priya is not labeled. Jory is labeled. Ulla is not oversized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is refrigerated and further is oversized and further is scanned, it thereby is prepaid. Point B. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby is not tracked. Point C. If said parcel is delayed and further is misrouted, it thereby has a courier. Point D. If said parcel is refrigerated and further is damaged and further is perishable, it thereby is rerouted. Point E. If said parcel is refrigerated and further has a waybill and further is misrouted, it thereby is tracked. Point F. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby is not stamped. Point G. If said parcel is refrigerated and further is misrouted and further is labeled, it thereby is stamped. Point H. If said parcel is refrigerated and further is weighed and further is fragile, it thereby is consolidated. Point I. If said parcel is registered, it thereby is not rerouted. Point J. If said parcel is refrigerated and further is registered and further is scanned, it thereby is undeliverable. Point K. If said parcel is refrigerated and further is perishable, it thereby is sealed. Point L. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby is not tracked. Point I supersedes Point D. Point B supersedes Point E. Point F supersedes Point G. Point L supersedes Point E. Question: Which choice is true for Ulla?", "options": ["is consolidated", "is undeliverable", "is rerouted", "is prepaid", "is sealed", "is stamped", "is tracked"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u020303", "pair_id": "u020303-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/20/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020303-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3baea661e60529c9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a18", "a3", "a6", "a8", "a12", "a16"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020374-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tundra is sharded. Tundra has no public endpoint. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Kestrel is backed up. Kestrel has no public endpoint. Tundra is not sandboxed. Tundra has a dedicated host. Kestrel has a dedicated host. Tundra is containerized. Tundra is not autoscaled. Halcyon is not autoscaled. Kestrel is not isolated. Halcyon has a public endpoint.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a failover node while is containerized, thus it is virtualized. Provision 2: when the workload here has a failover node while is autoscaled, thus it is idle. Provision 3: when the workload here is mirrored, thus it has a failover node. Provision 4: when the workload here is isolated, thus it is not cached. Provision 5: when the workload here is sharded, thus it is mirrored. Provision 6: when the workload here has a failover node while is isolated, thus it is monitored. Provision 7: when the workload here has a dedicated host, thus it is cached. Provision 8: when the workload here has a failover node while is backed up while is not sandboxed, thus it is throttled. Provision 9: when the workload here has a failover node while is not containerized while has no public endpoint, thus it has a firewall. Provision 2 has no effect when the workload here is backed up. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Tundra?", "options": ["is virtualized", "has a firewall", "is monitored", "is throttled", "is idle"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is virtualized", "unit_id": "u020374", "pair_id": "u020374-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020374-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "44053d440e33ec0c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a13", "a14", "a3", "a11", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u020374-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tundra is sharded. Tundra has no public endpoint. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Kestrel is backed up. Kestrel has no public endpoint. Tundra is not sandboxed. Tundra has a dedicated host. Kestrel has a dedicated host. Tundra is not containerized. Tundra is not autoscaled. Halcyon is not autoscaled. Kestrel is not isolated. Halcyon has a public endpoint.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a failover node while is containerized, thus it is virtualized. Provision 2: when the workload here has a failover node while is autoscaled, thus it is idle. Provision 3: when the workload here is mirrored, thus it has a failover node. Provision 4: when the workload here is isolated, thus it is not cached. Provision 5: when the workload here is sharded, thus it is mirrored. Provision 6: when the workload here has a failover node while is isolated, thus it is monitored. Provision 7: when the workload here has a dedicated host, thus it is cached. Provision 8: when the workload here has a failover node while is backed up while is not sandboxed, thus it is throttled. Provision 9: when the workload here has a failover node while is not containerized while has no public endpoint, thus it has a firewall. Provision 2 has no effect when the workload here is backed up. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Tundra?", "options": ["is virtualized", "has a firewall", "is monitored", "is throttled", "is idle"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a firewall", "unit_id": "u020374", "pair_id": "u020374-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020374-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d646cc3832c2f81e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a13", "a14", "a3", "a11", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u020403-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk is not amortized. Anouk has a guarantor. Wiebke has a guarantor. Anouk has no collateral. Wiebke is not amortized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is employed, it thereby is underwritten. Point B. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby is not underwritten. Point C. If said borrower has a guarantor, it thereby has no escrow account. Point D. If said borrower is employed, it thereby has no cosigner. Point E. If said borrower has a guarantor, it thereby has an escrow account. Point F. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby is not garnished. Point C is cancelled if said borrower is bankrupt. Point C is cancelled if said borrower is amortized. Point A is cancelled if said borrower is bankrupt. Point E is cancelled if said borrower is amortized. Point C is cancelled if said borrower has collateral. Point A supersedes Point B. Point C supersedes Point E. Question: Statement: Anouk has no escrow account. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020403", "pair_id": "u020403-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020403-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fe15c06d3b87af9b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u020403-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk is not amortized. Anouk has a guarantor. Anouk is employed. Wiebke has a guarantor. Anouk has no collateral. Wiebke is not amortized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is employed, it thereby is underwritten. Point B. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby is not underwritten. Point C. If said borrower has a guarantor, it thereby has no escrow account. Point D. If said borrower is employed, it thereby has no cosigner. Point E. If said borrower has a guarantor, it thereby has an escrow account. Point F. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby is not garnished. Point C is cancelled if said borrower is bankrupt. Point C is cancelled if said borrower is amortized. Point A is cancelled if said borrower is bankrupt. Point E is cancelled if said borrower is amortized. Point C is cancelled if said borrower has collateral. Point A supersedes Point B. Point C supersedes Point E. Question: Statement: Anouk has no escrow account. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020403", "pair_id": "u020403-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020403-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "646c28f93909a578", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u020404-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar has a milestone total of 14. Hadar has no seed funding. Hadar is collaborative. Kochab is longitudinal. Betelgeuse has seed funding. Kochab has a milestone total of 58. Kochab has a steering committee. Betelgeuse is collaborative. Hadar has a steering committee. Hadar is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is collaborative while has a milestone total beyond 59 while has industry backing, thus it is embargoed. Provision 2: when the proposal here is collaborative while has a milestone total at or below 20, thus it is not embargoed. Provision 3: when the proposal here is embargoed while is longitudinal, thus it is resubmitted. Provision 4: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is not a pilot study. Provision 5: when the proposal here has a steering committee, thus it is shortlisted. Provision 1 has no effect when the proposal here has a milestone total beneath 78 while has seed funding. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here has a milestone total at or above 45. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Hadar is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020404", "pair_id": "u020404-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020404-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "34c13ccf1246300d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020404-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar has a milestone total of 14. Hadar has no seed funding. Hadar is collaborative. Kochab is longitudinal. Betelgeuse has seed funding. Kochab has a milestone total of 58. Kochab has a steering committee. Betelgeuse is collaborative. Hadar has a steering committee. Hadar is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is collaborative while has a milestone total beyond 20 while has industry backing, thus it is embargoed. Provision 2: when the proposal here is collaborative while has a milestone total at or below 20, thus it is not embargoed. Provision 3: when the proposal here is embargoed while is longitudinal, thus it is resubmitted. Provision 4: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is not a pilot study. Provision 5: when the proposal here has a steering committee, thus it is shortlisted. Provision 1 has no effect when the proposal here has a milestone total beneath 78 while has seed funding. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here has a milestone total at or above 45. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Hadar is embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020404", "pair_id": "u020404-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020404-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a56113c0d10f2c4c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020404-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar has a milestone total of 14. Hadar has no seed funding. Hadar is collaborative. Kochab is longitudinal. Betelgeuse has seed funding. Kochab has a milestone total of 58. Kochab has a steering committee. Betelgeuse is collaborative. Hadar has a steering committee. Hadar is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is collaborative and likewise has a milestone total that exceeds 59 and likewise has industry backing, so it is embargoed. No. 2 While the given proposal is collaborative and likewise has a milestone total not above 20, so it is not embargoed. No. 3 While the given proposal is embargoed and likewise is longitudinal, so it is resubmitted. No. 4 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is not a pilot study. No. 5 While the given proposal has a steering committee, so it is shortlisted. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a milestone total that falls below 78 and likewise has seed funding. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a milestone total not below 45. No. 1 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Hadar is embargoed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020404", "pair_id": "u020404-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020404-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "34c13ccf1246300d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020404-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar has a milestone total of 14. Hadar has no seed funding. Hadar is collaborative. Kochab is longitudinal. Betelgeuse has seed funding. Kochab has a milestone total of 58. Kochab has a steering committee. Betelgeuse is collaborative. Hadar has a steering committee. Hadar is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is collaborative and likewise has a milestone total that exceeds 20 and likewise has industry backing, so it is embargoed. No. 2 While the given proposal is collaborative and likewise has a milestone total not above 20, so it is not embargoed. No. 3 While the given proposal is embargoed and likewise is longitudinal, so it is resubmitted. No. 4 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is not a pilot study. No. 5 While the given proposal has a steering committee, so it is shortlisted. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a milestone total that falls below 78 and likewise has seed funding. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a milestone total not below 45. No. 1 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Hadar is embargoed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020404", "pair_id": "u020404-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020404-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a56113c0d10f2c4c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020409-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid is not recommended.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not licensed provided that it has a notice period lower than 17. Section 2: a candidate is fingerprinted provided that it is not recommended. Section 3: a candidate is licensed provided that it has a notice period lower than 73. Section 4: a candidate is not fingerprinted provided that it has a notice period of 85 or higher. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Sigrid is not licensed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020409", "pair_id": "u020409-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020409-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "778d220dedff2837", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020409-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid is not recommended. Sigrid has a notice period of 48.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not licensed provided that it has a notice period lower than 17. Section 2: a candidate is fingerprinted provided that it is not recommended. Section 3: a candidate is licensed provided that it has a notice period lower than 73. Section 4: a candidate is not fingerprinted provided that it has a notice period of 85 or higher. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Sigrid is not licensed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020409", "pair_id": "u020409-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020409-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "84458d488194c980", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020432-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor has a delivery window of 5. Nandor is consolidated. Nandor has no locker slot. Nandor is not registered.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is not consolidated and is not registered and has a delivery window above 51, then it is refrigerated. (2) If a parcel is not consolidated, then it is misrouted. (2) is void if the parcel has a locker slot. Question: Is it true that Nandor is scanned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020432", "pair_id": "u020432-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020432-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4fa7dc3f496ea5a6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020432-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor has a delivery window of 5. Nandor is consolidated. Nandor is not scanned. Nandor has no locker slot. Nandor is not registered.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is not consolidated and is not registered and has a delivery window above 51, then it is refrigerated. (2) If a parcel is not consolidated, then it is misrouted. (2) is void if the parcel has a locker slot. Question: Is it true that Nandor is scanned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020432", "pair_id": "u020432-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020432-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "413b9f76b3bbc2c1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020463-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra is encrypted. Quasar is encrypted. Tundra is autoscaled. Quasar is not throttled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is encrypted plus is autoscaled plus is throttled: then it is not provisioned. Policy II. Suppose that workload is autoscaled: then it is not patched. Policy III. Suppose that workload is autoscaled: then it is patched. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Quasar is autoscaled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020463", "pair_id": "u020463-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020463-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "25a25a05f8bc2211", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020463-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar is autoscaled. Tundra is encrypted. Quasar is encrypted. Tundra is autoscaled. Quasar is not throttled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is encrypted plus is autoscaled plus is throttled: then it is not provisioned. Policy II. Suppose that workload is autoscaled: then it is not patched. Policy III. Suppose that workload is autoscaled: then it is patched. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Quasar is autoscaled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020463", "pair_id": "u020463-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020463-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2e9db9c3535bec45", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020520-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is not tagged. Pumice is tagged. Galena is reverted. Galena is tagged. Pumice is reverted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build has a patch cycle of 64 or less, it also is documented. Clause 2: once any build is documented, it also is linted. Clause 3: once any build is tagged, it also is not documented. Clause 4: once any build is reverted, it also is compiled. Question: Does it follow that Galena is not documented?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020520", "pair_id": "u020520-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020520-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "99b741537af57964", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u020520-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is not tagged. Pumice is tagged. Galena is reverted. Galena is tagged. Pumice is reverted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build has a patch cycle of 64 or less, it also is documented. Clause 2: once any build is documented, it also is linted. Clause 3: once any build is not tagged, it also is not documented. Clause 4: once any build is reverted, it also is compiled. Question: Does it follow that Galena is not documented?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020520", "pair_id": "u020520-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020520-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e39364d362c023f1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u020554-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Hadar is not preregistered. Aldebaran is not peer reviewed. Aldebaran has no patent filing. Hadar is not exploratory. Aldebaran is not renewed. Betelgeuse is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse is renewed. Fomalhaut is not budgeted. Fomalhaut has a field site. Betelgeuse has no field site. Aldebaran is exploratory. Betelgeuse is budgeted. Betelgeuse is exploratory. Hadar is peer reviewed. Aldebaran is not budgeted. Hadar has a field site. Fomalhaut has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is preregistered.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is renewed while is peer reviewed, thus it has no postdoc. Provision 2: when the proposal here has a patent filing while has a field site, thus it is shortlisted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is renewed while is budgeted while is preregistered, thus it has a postdoc. Provision 4: when the proposal here is not renewed, thus it is not shortlisted. Provision 3 has no effect when the proposal here is peer reviewed while is preregistered. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here is exploratory. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Betelgeuse has no postdoc?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020554", "pair_id": "u020554-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020554-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "524d43d325dae9b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u020554-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Hadar is not preregistered. Aldebaran is not peer reviewed. Aldebaran has no patent filing. Hadar is not exploratory. Aldebaran is not renewed. Betelgeuse is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse is renewed. Fomalhaut is not budgeted. Fomalhaut has a field site. Betelgeuse has no field site. Aldebaran is exploratory. Betelgeuse is budgeted. Betelgeuse is exploratory. Hadar is peer reviewed. Aldebaran is not budgeted. Hadar has a field site. Fomalhaut has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is preregistered.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is renewed while is peer reviewed, thus it has no postdoc. Provision 2: when the proposal here has a patent filing while has a field site, thus it is shortlisted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is renewed while is budgeted while is preregistered, thus it has a postdoc. Provision 4: when the proposal here is renewed, thus it is not shortlisted. Provision 3 has no effect when the proposal here is peer reviewed while is preregistered. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here is exploratory. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Betelgeuse has no postdoc?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020554", "pair_id": "u020554-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020554-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea37caf02ee10ffd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u020554-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Hadar is not preregistered. Aldebaran is not peer reviewed. Aldebaran has no patent filing. Hadar is not exploratory. Aldebaran is not renewed. Betelgeuse is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse is renewed. Fomalhaut is not budgeted. Fomalhaut has a field site. Betelgeuse has no field site. Aldebaran is exploratory. Betelgeuse is budgeted. Betelgeuse is exploratory. Hadar is peer reviewed. Aldebaran is not budgeted. Hadar has a field site. Fomalhaut has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is preregistered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is renewed and further is peer reviewed, it thereby has no postdoc. Point B. If said proposal has a patent filing and further has a field site, it thereby is shortlisted. Point C. If said proposal is renewed and further is budgeted and further is preregistered, it thereby has a postdoc. Point D. If said proposal is not renewed, it thereby is not shortlisted. Point C is cancelled if said proposal is peer reviewed and further is preregistered. Point B is cancelled if said proposal is exploratory. Point A supersedes Point C. Point D supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Betelgeuse has no postdoc. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020554", "pair_id": "u020554-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020554-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "524d43d325dae9b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u020554-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Hadar is not preregistered. Aldebaran is not peer reviewed. Aldebaran has no patent filing. Hadar is not exploratory. Aldebaran is not renewed. Betelgeuse is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse is renewed. Fomalhaut is not budgeted. Fomalhaut has a field site. Betelgeuse has no field site. Aldebaran is exploratory. Betelgeuse is budgeted. Betelgeuse is exploratory. Hadar is peer reviewed. Aldebaran is not budgeted. Hadar has a field site. Fomalhaut has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is preregistered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is renewed and further is peer reviewed, it thereby has no postdoc. Point B. If said proposal has a patent filing and further has a field site, it thereby is shortlisted. Point C. If said proposal is renewed and further is budgeted and further is preregistered, it thereby has a postdoc. Point D. If said proposal is renewed, it thereby is not shortlisted. Point C is cancelled if said proposal is peer reviewed and further is preregistered. Point B is cancelled if said proposal is exploratory. Point A supersedes Point C. Point D supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Betelgeuse has no postdoc. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020554", "pair_id": "u020554-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020554-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea37caf02ee10ffd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u020602-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is recommended. Kalle is not unionized. Lotte is a veteran. Lotte is probationary. Kalle is certified. Olek is licensed. Olek is a veteran. Lotte is bonded. Lotte is not certified. Kalle is probationary. Olek is not bonded. Kalle is not a veteran. Olek is sponsored. Olek has a portfolio. Kalle has a portfolio. Kalle is licensed. Lotte is not unionized. Lotte is not recommended. Olek is recommended. Kalle is sponsored. Kalle is bonded. Olek is not probationary. Olek is not certified. Lotte is sponsored. Lotte has a portfolio.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is not unionized, it also is onboarded. Clause 2: once any candidate is seasoned and also has a portfolio, it also is relocating. Clause 3: once any candidate has a diploma and also is probationary and also is a veteran, it also is not bilingual. Clause 4: once any candidate is seasoned and also is sponsored and also is certified, it also is not relocating. Clause 5: once any candidate is bilingual and also is licensed and also is recommended, it also is seasoned. Clause 6: once any candidate has a diploma, it also is not onboarded. Clause 7: once any candidate is probationary, it also is bilingual. Clause 3 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is a veteran and also is bonded. Clause 1 overrides Clause 6. Clause 4 overrides Clause 2. Clause 7 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Kalle is relocating?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020602", "pair_id": "u020602-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020602-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a7a3fc9b58e5c9c8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020602-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is recommended. Kalle is not unionized. Lotte is a veteran. Lotte is probationary. Kalle is certified. Olek is licensed. Olek is a veteran. Lotte is bonded. Lotte is not certified. Kalle is probationary. Olek is not bonded. Kalle is not a veteran. Olek is sponsored. Olek has a portfolio. Kalle has a portfolio. Kalle is licensed. Lotte is not unionized. Lotte is not recommended. Olek is recommended. Kalle is sponsored. Kalle is bonded. Olek is not probationary. Olek is not certified. Lotte is sponsored. Lotte has a portfolio.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is unionized, it also is onboarded. Clause 2: once any candidate is seasoned and also has a portfolio, it also is relocating. Clause 3: once any candidate has a diploma and also is probationary and also is a veteran, it also is not bilingual. Clause 4: once any candidate is seasoned and also is sponsored and also is certified, it also is not relocating. Clause 5: once any candidate is bilingual and also is licensed and also is recommended, it also is seasoned. Clause 6: once any candidate has a diploma, it also is not onboarded. Clause 7: once any candidate is probationary, it also is bilingual. Clause 3 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is a veteran and also is bonded. Clause 1 overrides Clause 6. Clause 4 overrides Clause 2. Clause 7 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Kalle is relocating?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020602", "pair_id": "u020602-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020602-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3af4c1296f24a360", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020671-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda has roadside assistance. Celeste is not reimbursed. Yara is not appraised. Celeste is not appraised. Yara has no flood coverage. Yara is not grandfathered. Yara is not reimbursed. Yara has roadside assistance. Celeste is grandfathered. Edda is grandfathered. Celeste has no roadside assistance.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is uninsurable, so it has a dashcam. No. 2 While the given policyholder has no adjuster, so it has a beneficiary. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not appraised, so it has no adjuster. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a beneficiary and likewise is grandfathered, so it is bundled. No. 5 While the given policyholder has no roadside assistance and likewise has flood coverage, so it is reinstated. No. 6 While the given policyholder has a beneficiary and likewise is not grandfathered, so it is not bundled. No. 7 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it has no beneficiary. No. 8 While the given policyholder is not appraised, so it has an adjuster. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not reimbursed. No. 3 wins over No. 8. No. 6 wins over No. 4. No. 7 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Celeste is bundled\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020671", "pair_id": "u020671-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020671-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2803424f158cba00", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u020671-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda has roadside assistance. Celeste is not reimbursed. Yara is not appraised. Celeste is not appraised. Yara has no flood coverage. Yara is not grandfathered. Yara is not reimbursed. Yara has roadside assistance. Celeste is grandfathered. Edda is grandfathered. Celeste has no roadside assistance.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is uninsurable, so it has a dashcam. No. 2 While the given policyholder has no adjuster, so it has a beneficiary. No. 3 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it has no adjuster. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a beneficiary and likewise is grandfathered, so it is bundled. No. 5 While the given policyholder has no roadside assistance and likewise has flood coverage, so it is reinstated. No. 6 While the given policyholder has a beneficiary and likewise is not grandfathered, so it is not bundled. No. 7 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it has no beneficiary. No. 8 While the given policyholder is not appraised, so it has an adjuster. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not reimbursed. No. 3 wins over No. 8. No. 6 wins over No. 4. No. 7 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Celeste is bundled\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020671", "pair_id": "u020671-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020671-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d0db1d7a985d0f8c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u020676-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is shortlisted. Capella is not translational. Capella is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is translational, it thereby is theoretical. Point B. If said proposal has a team size of minimum 12, it thereby is not collaborative. Point C. If said proposal is collaborative, it thereby is not exploratory. Question: Statement: Deneb is collaborative. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020676", "pair_id": "u020676-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020676-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "8a2217114be00f46", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020676-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is shortlisted. Capella is not translational. Capella is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is shortlisted, it thereby is collaborative. Point B. If said proposal is translational, it thereby is theoretical. Point C. If said proposal has a team size of minimum 12, it thereby is not collaborative. Point D. If said proposal is collaborative, it thereby is not exploratory. Question: Statement: Deneb is collaborative. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020676", "pair_id": "u020676-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020676-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "42a56e939c8bdc7f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020711-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not reverted. Schist is not merged. Schist has no feature toggle. Schist is not backported.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is not reverted, thus it is versioned. Provision 2: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it is fuzzed. Provision 3: when the build here is versioned while is not backported, thus it is not minified. Provision 4: when the build here is versioned while is backported while is not merged, thus it is minified. Question: Would it be right to say that Schist is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020711", "pair_id": "u020711-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020711-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "b33c4365125c6177", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 18}}
{"id": "syn-u020711-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not reverted. Schist is not merged. Schist has no feature toggle. Schist is backported.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is not reverted, thus it is versioned. Provision 2: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it is fuzzed. Provision 3: when the build here is versioned while is not backported, thus it is not minified. Provision 4: when the build here is versioned while is backported while is not merged, thus it is minified. Question: Would it be right to say that Schist is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020711", "pair_id": "u020711-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020711-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "2b0c94f40cfa2edb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 18}}
{"id": "syn-u020711-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not reverted. Schist is not merged. Schist has no feature toggle. Schist is not backported.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is not reverted, so it is versioned. No. 2 While the given build has a feature toggle, so it is fuzzed. No. 3 While the given build is versioned and likewise is not backported, so it is not minified. No. 4 While the given build is versioned and likewise is backported and likewise is not merged, so it is minified. Question: Is the claim \"Schist is minified\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020711", "pair_id": "u020711-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020711-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "b33c4365125c6177", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 18}}
{"id": "syn-u020711-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not reverted. Schist is not merged. Schist has no feature toggle. Schist is backported.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is not reverted, so it is versioned. No. 2 While the given build has a feature toggle, so it is fuzzed. No. 3 While the given build is versioned and likewise is not backported, so it is not minified. No. 4 While the given build is versioned and likewise is backported and likewise is not merged, so it is minified. Question: Is the claim \"Schist is minified\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020711", "pair_id": "u020711-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020711-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "2b0c94f40cfa2edb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 18}}
{"id": "syn-u020713-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny has a debt ratio of 85. Hamid is not a depositor. Evren has a repayment grade of 0. Evren has a risk tier of 53. Dagny has a repayment grade of 71. Hamid has a risk tier of 88. Dagny is not vetted. Evren is employed. Evren has a debt ratio of 35. Dagny is a depositor. Dagny is not refinanced. Evren is not refinanced. Hamid is refinanced. Hamid is vetted. Hamid is employed. Hamid has a repayment grade of 46. Hamid has a debt ratio of 17. Hamid has a credit rating of 97.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no cosigner provided that it is garnished as well as has a repayment grade of 58 or lower as well as is vetted. Section 2: a borrower is not garnished provided that it is employed. Section 3: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it is garnished as well as has a repayment grade of 58 or lower. Section 4: a borrower is not creditworthy provided that it is pensioned as well as is a depositor. Section 5: a borrower is amortized provided that it is employed as well as is refinanced. Section 6: a borrower is overdrawn provided that it has a debt ratio of 31 or lower. Section 7: a borrower is garnished provided that it is amortized as well as has a debt ratio lower than 47. Section 8: a borrower is not overdrawn provided that it has a debt ratio of 37 or lower. Section 9: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it has a risk tier of 25 or higher as well as has a credit rating of 43 or lower. Section 10: a borrower is not amortized provided that it is vetted as well as has a repayment grade lower than 23. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Hamid has a cosigner. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020713", "pair_id": "u020713-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020713-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "143672c979d69301", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u020713-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny has a debt ratio of 85. Hamid is not a depositor. Evren has a repayment grade of 0. Evren has a risk tier of 53. Dagny has a repayment grade of 71. Hamid has a risk tier of 88. Dagny is not vetted. Evren is employed. Evren has a debt ratio of 35. Dagny is a depositor. Dagny is not refinanced. Evren is not refinanced. Hamid is refinanced. Hamid is vetted. Hamid is employed. Hamid has a repayment grade of 46. Hamid has a debt ratio of 17. Hamid has a credit rating of 97.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no cosigner provided that it is garnished as well as has a repayment grade exceeding 58 as well as is vetted. Section 2: a borrower is not garnished provided that it is employed. Section 3: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it is garnished as well as has a repayment grade of 58 or lower. Section 4: a borrower is not creditworthy provided that it is pensioned as well as is a depositor. Section 5: a borrower is amortized provided that it is employed as well as is refinanced. Section 6: a borrower is overdrawn provided that it has a debt ratio of 31 or lower. Section 7: a borrower is garnished provided that it is amortized as well as has a debt ratio lower than 47. Section 8: a borrower is not overdrawn provided that it has a debt ratio of 37 or lower. Section 9: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it has a risk tier of 25 or higher as well as has a credit rating of 43 or lower. Section 10: a borrower is not amortized provided that it is vetted as well as has a repayment grade lower than 23. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Hamid has a cosigner. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020713", "pair_id": "u020713-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020713-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8cfa0ba1012297c2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u020762-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke is not refinanced. Anouk is bankrupt. Wiebke has a credit rating of 81. Anouk is refinanced. Hamid has a debt ratio of 33. Anouk has a debt ratio of 56. Hamid has a credit rating of 49. Anouk has a guarantor. Wiebke is not employed. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 32. Wiebke has a guarantor.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is employed, that borrower is foreclosed. Item B. When the borrower has no guarantor, and is employed, and is not bankrupt, that borrower is solvent. Item C. When the borrower is a homeowner, and has a debt ratio of less than 46, that borrower is not audited. Item D. When the borrower is a homeowner, and has a debt ratio of no less than 46, and has a credit rating of no more than 78, that borrower is audited. Item E. When the borrower is foreclosed, and is refinanced, and is not employed, that borrower is a homeowner. Question: Can one infer that Wiebke is audited?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020762", "pair_id": "u020762-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020762-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "7230ff62c9cf0306", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u020762-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wiebke is not refinanced. Anouk is bankrupt. Wiebke has a credit rating of 81. Anouk is refinanced. Hamid has a debt ratio of 33. Anouk has a debt ratio of 56. Hamid has a credit rating of 49. Anouk has a guarantor. Wiebke is not employed. Wiebke has a debt ratio of 32. Wiebke has a guarantor.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is not employed, that borrower is foreclosed. Item B. When the borrower has no guarantor, and is employed, and is not bankrupt, that borrower is solvent. Item C. When the borrower is a homeowner, and has a debt ratio of less than 46, that borrower is not audited. Item D. When the borrower is a homeowner, and has a debt ratio of no less than 46, and has a credit rating of no more than 78, that borrower is audited. Item E. When the borrower is foreclosed, and is refinanced, and is not employed, that borrower is a homeowner. Question: Can one infer that Wiebke is audited?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020762", "pair_id": "u020762-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020762-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a19af20be28d95fc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u020766-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel is not hypertensive. Wendel has a pacemaker. Wendel is waitlisted. Wendel is ambulatory. Wendel is not triaged. Wendel is pregnant. Wendel is not rescheduled. Wendel is not admitted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is pregnant, it also is referred. Clause 2: once any patient has a chaperone, it also is vaccinated. Clause 3: once any patient is symptomatic, it also is not referred. Clause 4: once any patient is referred, it also has a chaperone. Clause 5: once any patient is waitlisted, it also has no chaperone. Clause 6: once any patient has a pacemaker, it also is not asthmatic. Clause 7: once any patient is triaged, it also is discharged. Clause 8: once any patient has a chaperone, it also is not postoperative. Clause 9: once any patient has a chaperone, it also is postoperative. Clause 7 does not hold for a patient when any patient is bedridden. Clause 8 does not hold for a patient when any patient is rescheduled. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient is hypertensive. Clause 9 does not hold for a patient when any patient is admitted. Clause 9 does not hold for a patient when any patient is bedridden. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is symptomatic. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient is ambulatory. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Clause 9 overrides Clause 8. Question: Does it follow that Wendel is not postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020766", "pair_id": "u020766-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020766-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a558ef606ca331ee", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a15", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020766-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel is not hypertensive. Wendel has a pacemaker. Wendel is not waitlisted. Wendel is ambulatory. Wendel is not triaged. Wendel is pregnant. Wendel is not rescheduled. Wendel is not admitted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is pregnant, it also is referred. Clause 2: once any patient has a chaperone, it also is vaccinated. Clause 3: once any patient is symptomatic, it also is not referred. Clause 4: once any patient is referred, it also has a chaperone. Clause 5: once any patient is waitlisted, it also has no chaperone. Clause 6: once any patient has a pacemaker, it also is not asthmatic. Clause 7: once any patient is triaged, it also is discharged. Clause 8: once any patient has a chaperone, it also is not postoperative. Clause 9: once any patient has a chaperone, it also is postoperative. Clause 7 does not hold for a patient when any patient is bedridden. Clause 8 does not hold for a patient when any patient is rescheduled. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient is hypertensive. Clause 9 does not hold for a patient when any patient is admitted. Clause 9 does not hold for a patient when any patient is bedridden. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is symptomatic. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient is ambulatory. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Clause 9 overrides Clause 8. Question: Does it follow that Wendel is not postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020766", "pair_id": "u020766-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020766-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "260a7938e24c24a5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a15", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020780-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif is not discharged. Elif is symptomatic. Wendel is discharged.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is discharged, thus it has a chaperone. Provision 2: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it has no interpreter. Provision 3: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is allergic. Provision 4: when the patient here is discharged, thus it is referred. Provision 5: when the patient here is rescheduled, thus it is not admitted. Provision 6: when the patient here is referred, thus it is rescheduled. Question: Would it be right to say that Elif is not rescheduled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020780", "pair_id": "u020780-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020780-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "e6e8da2cc8cde1e0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020780-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif is not discharged. Elif is symptomatic. Wendel is discharged.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is discharged, thus it has a chaperone. Provision 2: when the patient here is allergic, thus it is not rescheduled. Provision 3: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it has no interpreter. Provision 4: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is allergic. Provision 5: when the patient here is discharged, thus it is referred. Provision 6: when the patient here is rescheduled, thus it is not admitted. Provision 7: when the patient here is referred, thus it is rescheduled. Question: Would it be right to say that Elif is not rescheduled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020780", "pair_id": "u020780-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020780-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "bbbf075efc91d6a3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020799-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not registered. Priya is labeled. Ulla has a delivery window of 75. Priya is oversized. Ulla is labeled. Priya is not weighed. Ulla is weighed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is labeled, it also is undeliverable. Clause 2: once any parcel is weighed, it also is not sealed. Clause 3: once any parcel is oversized, it also is hazardous. Clause 4: once any parcel is scanned, it also is not misrouted. Clause 5: once any parcel is not registered, it also is perishable. Clause 6: once any parcel is weighed, it also is sealed. Clause 7: once any parcel is not weighed, it also is not undeliverable. Clause 8: once any parcel is oversized, it also is not scanned. Clause 9: once any parcel is not oversized, it also is not perishable. Clause 10: once any parcel has a delivery window of 54 or less, it also is scanned. Clause 11: once any parcel is not sealed, it also is misrouted. Clause 4 overrides Clause 11. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 10 overrides Clause 8. Clause 1 overrides Clause 7. Clause 9 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Priya is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020799", "pair_id": "u020799-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020799-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0da103e452815eed", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u020799-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not registered. Priya is labeled. Ulla has a delivery window of 75. Priya is oversized. Ulla is labeled. Priya is not weighed. Ulla is weighed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is not labeled, it also is undeliverable. Clause 2: once any parcel is weighed, it also is not sealed. Clause 3: once any parcel is oversized, it also is hazardous. Clause 4: once any parcel is scanned, it also is not misrouted. Clause 5: once any parcel is not registered, it also is perishable. Clause 6: once any parcel is weighed, it also is sealed. Clause 7: once any parcel is not weighed, it also is not undeliverable. Clause 8: once any parcel is oversized, it also is not scanned. Clause 9: once any parcel is not oversized, it also is not perishable. Clause 10: once any parcel has a delivery window of 54 or less, it also is scanned. Clause 11: once any parcel is not sealed, it also is misrouted. Clause 4 overrides Clause 11. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 10 overrides Clause 8. Clause 1 overrides Clause 7. Clause 9 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Priya is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020799", "pair_id": "u020799-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020799-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "addb1dfbb365c309", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u020799-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not registered. Priya is labeled. Ulla has a delivery window of 75. Priya is oversized. Ulla is labeled. Priya is not weighed. Ulla is weighed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is labeled, that parcel is undeliverable. Item B. When the parcel is weighed, that parcel is not sealed. Item C. When the parcel is oversized, that parcel is hazardous. Item D. When the parcel is scanned, that parcel is not misrouted. Item E. When the parcel is not registered, that parcel is perishable. Item F. When the parcel is weighed, that parcel is sealed. Item G. When the parcel is not weighed, that parcel is not undeliverable. Item H. When the parcel is oversized, that parcel is not scanned. Item I. When the parcel is not oversized, that parcel is not perishable. Item J. When the parcel has a delivery window of no more than 54, that parcel is scanned. Item K. When the parcel is not sealed, that parcel is misrouted. Item D outranks Item K. Item B outranks Item F. Item J outranks Item H. Item A outranks Item G. Item I outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Priya is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020799", "pair_id": "u020799-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020799-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0da103e452815eed", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u020799-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not registered. Priya is labeled. Ulla has a delivery window of 75. Priya is oversized. Ulla is labeled. Priya is not weighed. Ulla is weighed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is not labeled, that parcel is undeliverable. Item B. When the parcel is weighed, that parcel is not sealed. Item C. When the parcel is oversized, that parcel is hazardous. Item D. When the parcel is scanned, that parcel is not misrouted. Item E. When the parcel is not registered, that parcel is perishable. Item F. When the parcel is weighed, that parcel is sealed. Item G. When the parcel is not weighed, that parcel is not undeliverable. Item H. When the parcel is oversized, that parcel is not scanned. Item I. When the parcel is not oversized, that parcel is not perishable. Item J. When the parcel has a delivery window of no more than 54, that parcel is scanned. Item K. When the parcel is not sealed, that parcel is misrouted. Item D outranks Item K. Item B outranks Item F. Item J outranks Item H. Item A outranks Item G. Item I outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Priya is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020799", "pair_id": "u020799-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020799-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "addb1dfbb365c309", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u020801-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is monitored. Cobalt has no failover node. Halcyon is not backed up. Halcyon is monitored. Halcyon has no failover node. Halcyon is sandboxed. Cobalt is backed up. Halcyon is stateless.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload has no failover node plus is sandboxed plus is stateless: then it has a firewall. Policy II. Suppose that workload is monitored: then it is not sharded. Policy III. Suppose that workload has a failover node plus is backed up: then it has no firewall. Question: Is it so that Halcyon has a firewall?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020801", "pair_id": "u020801-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020801-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "0abef57fd83b9ae2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020801-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is monitored. Cobalt has no failover node. Halcyon is not backed up. Halcyon is monitored. Halcyon has no failover node. Halcyon is sandboxed. Cobalt is backed up. Halcyon is stateless.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload has a failover node plus is sandboxed plus is stateless: then it has a firewall. Policy II. Suppose that workload is monitored: then it is not sharded. Policy III. Suppose that workload has a failover node plus is backed up: then it has no firewall. Question: Is it so that Halcyon has a firewall?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020801", "pair_id": "u020801-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020801-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "6d0343c6ffe7ef10", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u020819-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is not stateless. Halcyon is throttled. Halcyon is not sharded. Kestrel is not throttled. Vesper is monitored. Halcyon has a dedicated host. Vesper is not sandboxed. Halcyon is not monitored. Vesper is not stateless.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is autoscaled, thus it is virtualized. Provision 2: when the workload here is throttled, thus it is not containerized. Provision 3: when the workload here is stateless, thus it is not virtualized. Provision 4: when the workload here is not sharded, thus it is autoscaled. Provision 5: when the workload here is autoscaled, thus it has no snapshot. Provision 6: when the workload here is sandboxed, thus it is not autoscaled. Provision 7: when the workload here is autoscaled, thus it has a snapshot. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here is monitored. Provision 7 has no effect when the workload here is stateless. Provision 2 has no effect when the workload here has a dedicated host. Provision 5 has no effect when the workload here has a dedicated host. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here is sharded. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Halcyon has no snapshot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020819", "pair_id": "u020819-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020819-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8aa63945f9d1ea5a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020819-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is not stateless. Halcyon is throttled. Halcyon is not sharded. Kestrel is not throttled. Vesper is monitored. Halcyon has a dedicated host. Vesper is not sandboxed. Halcyon is not monitored. Vesper is not stateless.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is autoscaled, thus it is virtualized. Provision 2: when the workload here is throttled, thus it is not containerized. Provision 3: when the workload here is stateless, thus it is not virtualized. Provision 4: when the workload here is sharded, thus it is autoscaled. Provision 5: when the workload here is autoscaled, thus it has no snapshot. Provision 6: when the workload here is sandboxed, thus it is not autoscaled. Provision 7: when the workload here is autoscaled, thus it has a snapshot. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here is monitored. Provision 7 has no effect when the workload here is stateless. Provision 2 has no effect when the workload here has a dedicated host. Provision 5 has no effect when the workload here has a dedicated host. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here is sharded. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Halcyon has no snapshot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020819", "pair_id": "u020819-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020819-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "566ca0b0c7f85cd8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020819-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is not stateless. Halcyon is throttled. Halcyon is not sharded. Kestrel is not throttled. Vesper is monitored. Halcyon has a dedicated host. Vesper is not sandboxed. Halcyon is not monitored. Vesper is not stateless.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is autoscaled, it thereby is virtualized. Point B. If said workload is throttled, it thereby is not containerized. Point C. If said workload is stateless, it thereby is not virtualized. Point D. If said workload is not sharded, it thereby is autoscaled. Point E. If said workload is autoscaled, it thereby has no snapshot. Point F. If said workload is sandboxed, it thereby is not autoscaled. Point G. If said workload is autoscaled, it thereby has a snapshot. Point D is cancelled if said workload is monitored. Point G is cancelled if said workload is stateless. Point B is cancelled if said workload has a dedicated host. Point E is cancelled if said workload has a dedicated host. Point A is cancelled if said workload is sharded. Point C supersedes Point A. Point E supersedes Point G. Point F supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Halcyon has no snapshot. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020819", "pair_id": "u020819-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020819-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8aa63945f9d1ea5a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020819-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is not stateless. Halcyon is throttled. Halcyon is not sharded. Kestrel is not throttled. Vesper is monitored. Halcyon has a dedicated host. Vesper is not sandboxed. Halcyon is not monitored. Vesper is not stateless.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is autoscaled, it thereby is virtualized. Point B. If said workload is throttled, it thereby is not containerized. Point C. If said workload is stateless, it thereby is not virtualized. Point D. If said workload is sharded, it thereby is autoscaled. Point E. If said workload is autoscaled, it thereby has no snapshot. Point F. If said workload is sandboxed, it thereby is not autoscaled. Point G. If said workload is autoscaled, it thereby has a snapshot. Point D is cancelled if said workload is monitored. Point G is cancelled if said workload is stateless. Point B is cancelled if said workload has a dedicated host. Point E is cancelled if said workload has a dedicated host. Point A is cancelled if said workload is sharded. Point C supersedes Point A. Point E supersedes Point G. Point F supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Halcyon has no snapshot. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020819", "pair_id": "u020819-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020819-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "566ca0b0c7f85cd8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u020832-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia has a postal zone of 28. Liesel is tracked. Saskia is weighed. Saskia has a barcode. Liesel is hazardous. Liesel is weighed. Saskia is not tracked. Saskia is hazardous. Liesel has a postal zone of 85. Saskia is not undeliverable. Liesel is undeliverable.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here has a barcode, thus it is misrouted. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a postal zone beyond 69, thus it is delayed. Provision 3: when the parcel here is delayed, thus it is refrigerated. Provision 4: when the parcel here has a locker slot, thus it is stamped. Provision 5: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it is palletized. Provision 6: when the parcel here is weighed, thus it is perishable. Provision 7: when the parcel here is tracked, thus it has a waybill. Provision 8: when the parcel here is scanned, thus it is sealed. Provision 9: when the parcel here is hazardous, thus it has a locker slot. Provision 10: when the parcel here has a waybill, thus it is scanned. Provision 11: when the parcel here is stamped, thus it is labeled. Provision 6 has no effect when the parcel here has a postal zone at or below 20. Provision 11 has no effect when the parcel here is undeliverable. Provision 11 has no effect when the parcel here is tracked. Provision 1 has no effect when the parcel here is undeliverable. Question: Which one describes Saskia?", "options": ["is sealed", "is labeled", "is palletized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is labeled", "unit_id": "u020832", "pair_id": "u020832-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020832-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "015148d44c68c2ab", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a14", "a11"]}, "attempt": 17}}
{"id": "syn-u020832-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia has a postal zone of 28. Liesel is tracked. Saskia is weighed. Saskia has no barcode. Liesel is hazardous. Liesel is weighed. Saskia is not tracked. Saskia is hazardous. Liesel has a postal zone of 85. Saskia is not undeliverable. Liesel is undeliverable.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here has a barcode, thus it is misrouted. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a postal zone beyond 69, thus it is delayed. Provision 3: when the parcel here is delayed, thus it is refrigerated. Provision 4: when the parcel here has a locker slot, thus it is stamped. Provision 5: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it is palletized. Provision 6: when the parcel here is weighed, thus it is perishable. Provision 7: when the parcel here is tracked, thus it has a waybill. Provision 8: when the parcel here is scanned, thus it is sealed. Provision 9: when the parcel here is hazardous, thus it has a locker slot. Provision 10: when the parcel here has a waybill, thus it is scanned. Provision 11: when the parcel here is stamped, thus it is labeled. Provision 6 has no effect when the parcel here has a postal zone at or below 20. Provision 11 has no effect when the parcel here is undeliverable. Provision 11 has no effect when the parcel here is tracked. Provision 1 has no effect when the parcel here is undeliverable. Question: Which one describes Saskia?", "options": ["is sealed", "is labeled", "is palletized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is labeled", "unit_id": "u020832", "pair_id": "u020832-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020832-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "94d64dfbe790bc62", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a14", "a11"]}, "attempt": 17}}
{"id": "syn-u020832-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia has a postal zone of 28. Liesel is tracked. Saskia is weighed. Saskia has a barcode. Liesel is hazardous. Liesel is weighed. Saskia is not tracked. Saskia is hazardous. Liesel has a postal zone of 85. Saskia is not undeliverable. Liesel is undeliverable.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel has a barcode, it thereby is misrouted. Point B. If said parcel has a postal zone in excess of 69, it thereby is delayed. Point C. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby is refrigerated. Point D. If said parcel has a locker slot, it thereby is stamped. Point E. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby is palletized. Point F. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby is perishable. Point G. If said parcel is tracked, it thereby has a waybill. Point H. If said parcel is scanned, it thereby is sealed. Point I. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby has a locker slot. Point J. If said parcel has a waybill, it thereby is scanned. Point K. If said parcel is stamped, it thereby is labeled. Point F is cancelled if said parcel has a postal zone of maximum 20. Point K is cancelled if said parcel is undeliverable. Point K is cancelled if said parcel is tracked. Point A is cancelled if said parcel is undeliverable. Question: Which choice is true for Saskia?", "options": ["is sealed", "is labeled", "is palletized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is labeled", "unit_id": "u020832", "pair_id": "u020832-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020832-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "015148d44c68c2ab", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a14", "a11"]}, "attempt": 17}}
{"id": "syn-u020832-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia has a postal zone of 28. Liesel is tracked. Saskia is weighed. Saskia has no barcode. Liesel is hazardous. Liesel is weighed. Saskia is not tracked. Saskia is hazardous. Liesel has a postal zone of 85. Saskia is not undeliverable. Liesel is undeliverable.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel has a barcode, it thereby is misrouted. Point B. If said parcel has a postal zone in excess of 69, it thereby is delayed. Point C. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby is refrigerated. Point D. If said parcel has a locker slot, it thereby is stamped. Point E. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby is palletized. Point F. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby is perishable. Point G. If said parcel is tracked, it thereby has a waybill. Point H. If said parcel is scanned, it thereby is sealed. Point I. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby has a locker slot. Point J. If said parcel has a waybill, it thereby is scanned. Point K. If said parcel is stamped, it thereby is labeled. Point F is cancelled if said parcel has a postal zone of maximum 20. Point K is cancelled if said parcel is undeliverable. Point K is cancelled if said parcel is tracked. Point A is cancelled if said parcel is undeliverable. Question: Which choice is true for Saskia?", "options": ["is sealed", "is labeled", "is palletized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is labeled", "unit_id": "u020832", "pair_id": "u020832-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u020832-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "94d64dfbe790bc62", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a14", "a11"]}, "attempt": 17}}
{"id": "syn-u020834-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not eligible. Mads has a background screening. Hedda is bilingual. Mads is a veteran. Mads is not unionized. Sigrid is eligible. Sigrid is not unionized. Mads is bilingual. Hedda is not eligible. Sigrid is bilingual. Mads is sponsored. Hedda is not unionized.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate has a portfolio and also is eligible and also is a veteran, it also is recommended. Clause 2: once any candidate is bilingual, it also has a portfolio. Clause 3: once any candidate is unionized and also has a background screening, it also has no visa. Clause 4: once any candidate has no portfolio and also is sponsored and also is a veteran, it also is not recommended. Question: Does it follow that Mads is recommended?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020834", "pair_id": "u020834-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020834-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "02bbc3605ec110ad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u020834-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not eligible. Mads has a background screening. Hedda is bilingual. Mads is a veteran. Mads is not unionized. Sigrid is eligible. Sigrid is not unionized. Mads is bilingual. Hedda is not eligible. Sigrid is bilingual. Mads is sponsored. Hedda is not unionized.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate has a portfolio and also is eligible and also is a veteran, it also is recommended. Clause 2: once any candidate is bilingual, it also has a portfolio. Clause 3: once any candidate is unionized and also has a background screening, it also has no visa. Clause 4: once any candidate has a portfolio and also is sponsored and also is a veteran, it also is not recommended. Question: Does it follow that Mads is recommended?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u020834", "pair_id": "u020834-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020834-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "080baf8347579a94", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u020896-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra has no seed funding. Nashira is not resubmitted. Electra has a milestone total of 50. Electra is resubmitted. Electra has a review mark of 86. Nashira has a review mark of 28. Nashira has a milestone total of 59.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is exploratory provided that it is not cofunded. Section 2: a proposal is endorsed provided that it is exploratory. Section 3: a proposal has no postdoc provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 61. Section 4: a proposal is renewed provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 5: a proposal is embargoed provided that it is resubmitted. Section 6: a proposal is not preregistered provided that it has a review mark of 75 or higher. Section 7: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it is not preregistered. Section 8: a proposal is not cofunded provided that it has a review mark lower than 75. Section 9: a proposal is theoretical provided that it has no seed funding. Question: Which statement fits Electra?", "options": ["is renewed", "is endorsed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is renewed", "unit_id": "u020896", "pair_id": "u020896-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020896-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "b75c5625817efa15", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a3"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u020896-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra has no seed funding. Nashira is not resubmitted. Electra has a milestone total of 50. Electra is resubmitted. Electra has a review mark of 21. Nashira has a review mark of 28. Nashira has a milestone total of 59.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is exploratory provided that it is not cofunded. Section 2: a proposal is endorsed provided that it is exploratory. Section 3: a proposal has no postdoc provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 61. Section 4: a proposal is renewed provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 5: a proposal is embargoed provided that it is resubmitted. Section 6: a proposal is not preregistered provided that it has a review mark of 75 or higher. Section 7: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it is not preregistered. Section 8: a proposal is not cofunded provided that it has a review mark lower than 75. Section 9: a proposal is theoretical provided that it has no seed funding. Question: Which statement fits Electra?", "options": ["is renewed", "is endorsed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u020896", "pair_id": "u020896-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020896-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "f5ce3fb21f1546af", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a3"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u020916-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf is not admitted. Gunnar is not pregnant. Vilja is not pregnant. Gunnar has no chaperone. Vilja is rescheduled. Dorian is symptomatic. Dorian is admitted. Dorian has a chaperone. Gunnar is rescheduled. Yusuf is fasting. Dorian is not pregnant. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Dorian is fasting. Gunnar is symptomatic. Yusuf has no chaperone. Gunnar is admitted. Vilja is not admitted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is hypertensive. No. 2 While the given patient is fasting, so it is not hypertensive. No. 3 While the given patient is discharged, so it is not triaged. No. 4 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is anemic. No. 5 While the given patient has a chaperone, so it is not anemic. No. 6 While the given patient is admitted, so it is discharged. No. 7 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is sedated. No. 8 While the given patient is discharged, so it is triaged. No. 9 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is not sedated. No. 10 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is not discharged. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given patient is pregnant. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given patient is admitted. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given patient is admitted. No. 8 stops applying as long as the given patient is symptomatic. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given patient is pregnant. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given patient is symptomatic. No. 8 wins over No. 3. No. 7 wins over No. 9. No. 10 wins over No. 6. No. 5 wins over No. 4. No. 1 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Gunnar is not triaged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u020916", "pair_id": "u020916-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020916-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "274d413a4259b5b5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u020916-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf is not admitted. Gunnar is not pregnant. Vilja is not pregnant. Gunnar has no chaperone. Vilja is rescheduled. Dorian is symptomatic. Dorian is admitted. Dorian has a chaperone. Gunnar is rescheduled. Yusuf is fasting. Dorian is not pregnant. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Dorian is fasting. Gunnar is symptomatic. Yusuf has no chaperone. Gunnar is admitted. Vilja is not admitted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is hypertensive. No. 2 While the given patient is fasting, so it is not hypertensive. No. 3 While the given patient is discharged, so it is not triaged. No. 4 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is anemic. No. 5 While the given patient has a chaperone, so it is not anemic. No. 6 While the given patient is admitted, so it is discharged. No. 7 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is sedated. No. 8 While the given patient is discharged, so it is triaged. No. 9 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is not sedated. No. 10 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is not discharged. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given patient is pregnant. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given patient is admitted. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given patient is admitted. No. 8 stops applying as long as the given patient is symptomatic. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given patient is pregnant. No. 10 stops applying as long as the given patient is rescheduled. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given patient is symptomatic. No. 8 wins over No. 3. No. 7 wins over No. 9. No. 10 wins over No. 6. No. 5 wins over No. 4. No. 1 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Gunnar is not triaged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u020916", "pair_id": "u020916-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020916-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "003f5b7e593c374b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u020976-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel has a pulse rate of 64. Zora has a pain level of 53. Wendel has no caregiver. Cosima has a pulse rate of 57. Aurel has a caregiver. Zora has a mobility rank of 69. Aurel is not rescheduled. Zora has no caregiver. Wendel is symptomatic. Wendel has a pain level of 19. Cosima has a pacemaker. Aurel has a pulse rate of 50. Cosima has a mobility rank of 90. Zora has a pulse rate of 11. Cosima is rescheduled. Zora is not rescheduled. Aurel has a mobility rank of 42.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is allergic. Provision 2: when the patient here is rescheduled, thus it is admitted. Provision 3: when the patient here has a pulse rate beneath 10, thus it is not postoperative. Provision 4: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it is fasting. Provision 5: when the patient here has a pain level at or above 85, thus it has a chaperone. Provision 6: when the patient here has a pain level at or below 50, thus it is vaccinated. Provision 7: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it has no chaperone. Provision 8: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it is not admitted. Provision 9: when the patient here has a pulse rate at or above 30, thus it is diabetic. Provision 10: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 85, thus it is pregnant. Provision 11: when the patient here has a pulse rate beneath 30, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 12: when the patient here has a caregiver, thus it is bedridden. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Which one describes Zora?", "options": ["is pregnant", "is allergic", "is hypertensive", "has a chaperone", "is fasting", "is admitted", "is diabetic"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is hypertensive", "unit_id": "u020976", "pair_id": "u020976-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/13/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020976-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3279a335a92baf08", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a8", "a4", "a0", "a15", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u020976-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel has a pulse rate of 64. Zora has a pain level of 53. Wendel has no caregiver. Cosima has a pulse rate of 57. Aurel has a caregiver. Zora has a mobility rank of 69. Aurel is not rescheduled. Zora has no caregiver. Wendel is symptomatic. Wendel has a pain level of 19. Cosima has a pacemaker. Aurel has a pulse rate of 50. Cosima has a mobility rank of 90. Zora has a pulse rate of 59. Cosima is rescheduled. Zora is not rescheduled. Aurel has a mobility rank of 42.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is allergic. Provision 2: when the patient here is rescheduled, thus it is admitted. Provision 3: when the patient here has a pulse rate beneath 10, thus it is not postoperative. Provision 4: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it is fasting. Provision 5: when the patient here has a pain level at or above 85, thus it has a chaperone. Provision 6: when the patient here has a pain level at or below 50, thus it is vaccinated. Provision 7: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it has no chaperone. Provision 8: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it is not admitted. Provision 9: when the patient here has a pulse rate at or above 30, thus it is diabetic. Provision 10: when the patient here has a mobility rank at or above 85, thus it is pregnant. Provision 11: when the patient here has a pulse rate beneath 30, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 12: when the patient here has a caregiver, thus it is bedridden. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Which one describes Zora?", "options": ["is pregnant", "is allergic", "is hypertensive", "has a chaperone", "is fasting", "is admitted", "is diabetic"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is diabetic", "unit_id": "u020976", "pair_id": "u020976-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/13/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020976-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "84dbfe13b8bd4efe", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a8", "a4", "a0", "a15", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u020976-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel has a pulse rate of 64. Zora has a pain level of 53. Wendel has no caregiver. Cosima has a pulse rate of 57. Aurel has a caregiver. Zora has a mobility rank of 69. Aurel is not rescheduled. Zora has no caregiver. Wendel is symptomatic. Wendel has a pain level of 19. Cosima has a pacemaker. Aurel has a pulse rate of 50. Cosima has a mobility rank of 90. Zora has a pulse rate of 11. Cosima is rescheduled. Zora is not rescheduled. Aurel has a mobility rank of 42.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby is allergic. Point B. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is admitted. Point C. If said patient has a pulse rate short of 10, it thereby is not postoperative. Point D. If said patient has a pacemaker, it thereby is fasting. Point E. If said patient has a pain level of minimum 85, it thereby has a chaperone. Point F. If said patient has a pain level of maximum 50, it thereby is vaccinated. Point G. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby has no chaperone. Point H. If said patient has a pacemaker, it thereby is not admitted. Point I. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 30, it thereby is diabetic. Point J. If said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 85, it thereby is pregnant. Point K. If said patient has a pulse rate short of 30, it thereby is hypertensive. Point L. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby is bedridden. Point G supersedes Point E. Point H supersedes Point B. Question: Which choice is true for Zora?", "options": ["is pregnant", "is allergic", "is hypertensive", "has a chaperone", "is fasting", "is admitted", "is diabetic"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is hypertensive", "unit_id": "u020976", "pair_id": "u020976-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/13/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020976-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3279a335a92baf08", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a8", "a4", "a0", "a15", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u020976-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel has a pulse rate of 64. Zora has a pain level of 53. Wendel has no caregiver. Cosima has a pulse rate of 57. Aurel has a caregiver. Zora has a mobility rank of 69. Aurel is not rescheduled. Zora has no caregiver. Wendel is symptomatic. Wendel has a pain level of 19. Cosima has a pacemaker. Aurel has a pulse rate of 50. Cosima has a mobility rank of 90. Zora has a pulse rate of 59. Cosima is rescheduled. Zora is not rescheduled. Aurel has a mobility rank of 42.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby is allergic. Point B. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is admitted. Point C. If said patient has a pulse rate short of 10, it thereby is not postoperative. Point D. If said patient has a pacemaker, it thereby is fasting. Point E. If said patient has a pain level of minimum 85, it thereby has a chaperone. Point F. If said patient has a pain level of maximum 50, it thereby is vaccinated. Point G. If said patient is symptomatic, it thereby has no chaperone. Point H. If said patient has a pacemaker, it thereby is not admitted. Point I. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 30, it thereby is diabetic. Point J. If said patient has a mobility rank of minimum 85, it thereby is pregnant. Point K. If said patient has a pulse rate short of 30, it thereby is hypertensive. Point L. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby is bedridden. Point G supersedes Point E. Point H supersedes Point B. Question: Which choice is true for Zora?", "options": ["is pregnant", "is allergic", "is hypertensive", "has a chaperone", "is fasting", "is admitted", "is diabetic"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is diabetic", "unit_id": "u020976", "pair_id": "u020976-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/13/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020976-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "84dbfe13b8bd4efe", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a8", "a4", "a0", "a15", "a1", "a11"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u020991-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has a citation index of 92. Electra is renewed. Mirach is not embargoed. Gemma has no postdoc. Electra has no ethics clearance. Electra has a citation index of 65. Electra has a postdoc. Nashira has no ethics clearance. Nashira is not renewed. Nashira is embargoed. Gemma has ethics clearance. Mirach has a citation index of 57. Gemma is embargoed. Mirach has a steering committee.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is embargoed: then it is peer reviewed. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has ethics clearance: then it is not cofunded. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is renewed: then it is exploratory. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee: then it is not endorsed. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has a postdoc: then it has a patent filing. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has a postdoc: then it is not shortlisted. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal has a citation index higher than 50: then it is shortlisted. Policy IV is waived if that proposal has no postdoc. Policy V is waived if that proposal is renewed. Policy II is waived if that proposal has ethics clearance. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy VII. Question: Which choice is right for Mirach?", "options": ["is shortlisted", "is exploratory", "has a patent filing"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is shortlisted", "unit_id": "u020991", "pair_id": "u020991-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020991-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "973bc1d9cfce45de", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a5", "a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u020991-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has a citation index of 92. Electra is renewed. Mirach is not embargoed. Gemma has no postdoc. Mirach has a postdoc. Electra has no ethics clearance. Electra has a citation index of 65. Electra has a postdoc. Nashira has no ethics clearance. Nashira is not renewed. Nashira is embargoed. Gemma has ethics clearance. Mirach has a citation index of 57. Gemma is embargoed. Mirach has a steering committee.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is embargoed: then it is peer reviewed. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has ethics clearance: then it is not cofunded. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is renewed: then it is exploratory. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee: then it is not endorsed. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has a postdoc: then it has a patent filing. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has a postdoc: then it is not shortlisted. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal has a citation index higher than 50: then it is shortlisted. Policy IV is waived if that proposal has no postdoc. Policy V is waived if that proposal is renewed. Policy II is waived if that proposal has ethics clearance. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy VII. Question: Which choice is right for Mirach?", "options": ["is shortlisted", "is exploratory", "has a patent filing"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a patent filing", "unit_id": "u020991", "pair_id": "u020991-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u020991-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "79e9c428950a7130", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a5", "a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u021039-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is overdrawn. Bastien is not indebted. Corin has a repayment grade of 31. Evren is indebted. Evren has a repayment grade of 51. Hamid has a repayment grade of 36.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower has a repayment grade of at most 11, then it is not pensioned. (2) If a borrower is indebted, then it is not underwritten. (3) If a borrower is overdrawn, then it is pensioned. When (1) and (3) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Evren is pensioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021039", "pair_id": "u021039-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021039-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ce9ca9db21111cd8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021039-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is overdrawn. Bastien is not indebted. Corin has a repayment grade of 31. Evren is overdrawn. Evren is indebted. Evren has a repayment grade of 51. Hamid has a repayment grade of 36.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower has a repayment grade of at most 11, then it is not pensioned. (2) If a borrower is indebted, then it is not underwritten. (3) If a borrower is overdrawn, then it is pensioned. When (1) and (3) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Evren is pensioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021039", "pair_id": "u021039-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021039-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a407b5e2753ddb2a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021039-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is overdrawn. Bastien is not indebted. Corin has a repayment grade of 31. Evren is indebted. Evren has a repayment grade of 51. Hamid has a repayment grade of 36.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower has a repayment grade of no more than 11, that borrower is not pensioned. Item B. When the borrower is indebted, that borrower is not underwritten. Item C. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower is pensioned. Item A outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Evren is pensioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021039", "pair_id": "u021039-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021039-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ce9ca9db21111cd8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021039-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is overdrawn. Bastien is not indebted. Corin has a repayment grade of 31. Evren is overdrawn. Evren is indebted. Evren has a repayment grade of 51. Hamid has a repayment grade of 36.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower has a repayment grade of no more than 11, that borrower is not pensioned. Item B. When the borrower is indebted, that borrower is not underwritten. Item C. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower is pensioned. Item A outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Evren is pensioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021039", "pair_id": "u021039-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021039-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a407b5e2753ddb2a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021040-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra has a milestone total of 26. Kochab is cofunded. Mirach has no field site. Kochab has a milestone total of 60. Kochab has no field site. Electra is not endorsed. Mirach has a steering committee. Mirach is not endorsed. Electra has no field site. Electra is cofunded. Mirach has a team size of 18.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a team size no higher than 17 plus has no field site: then it has industry backing. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a citation index no lower than 49: then it is shortlisted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a team size higher than 17 plus is not endorsed: then it is interdisciplinary. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a citation index smaller than 49: then it is a pilot study. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a milestone total no higher than 70 plus has a citation index smaller than 73: then it has a patent filing. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has a citation index no higher than 22 plus is cofunded: then it is not multicenter. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal is cofunded plus has a field site: then it is resubmitted. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal has a field site: then it has no postdoc. Policy IX. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a milestone total higher than 70 plus has a citation index no lower than 36: then it is renewed. Question: Which choice is right for Mirach?", "options": ["is a pilot study", "has a patent filing", "is renewed", "is interdisciplinary", "is shortlisted", "has industry backing"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is interdisciplinary", "unit_id": "u021040", "pair_id": "u021040-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021040-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "41d7d3b1ef964299", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a1", "a13", "a11", "a12", "a8", "a15"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u021040-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra has a milestone total of 26. Kochab is cofunded. Mirach has no field site. Kochab has a milestone total of 60. Kochab has no field site. Electra is not endorsed. Mirach has a steering committee. Mirach is not endorsed. Electra has no field site. Electra is cofunded. Mirach has a team size of 3.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a team size no higher than 17 plus has no field site: then it has industry backing. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a citation index no lower than 49: then it is shortlisted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a team size higher than 17 plus is not endorsed: then it is interdisciplinary. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a citation index smaller than 49: then it is a pilot study. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a milestone total no higher than 70 plus has a citation index smaller than 73: then it has a patent filing. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has a citation index no higher than 22 plus is cofunded: then it is not multicenter. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal is cofunded plus has a field site: then it is resubmitted. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal has a field site: then it has no postdoc. Policy IX. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a milestone total higher than 70 plus has a citation index no lower than 36: then it is renewed. Question: Which choice is right for Mirach?", "options": ["is a pilot study", "has a patent filing", "is renewed", "is interdisciplinary", "is shortlisted", "has industry backing"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has industry backing", "unit_id": "u021040", "pair_id": "u021040-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021040-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "59fb866bcc02c249", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a1", "a13", "a11", "a12", "a8", "a15"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u021069-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is reimbursed. Dmitri is disputed. Dmitri is not indemnified. Dmitri is reinstated. Dmitri is not inspected. Dmitri is retired. Dmitri has a beneficiary.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is reinstated and is reimbursed and is disputed, then it has a dashcam. (2) If a policyholder is reinstated and is lapsed and is disputed, then it is subrogated. (3) If a policyholder is indemnified and is not retired and is reimbursed, then it has no flood coverage. (4) If a policyholder is reinstated and is not reimbursed, then it is grandfathered. (5) If a policyholder is not inspected, then it is a smoker. (6) If a policyholder is reinstated and has a beneficiary and has an adjuster, then it has a premium discount. (7) If a policyholder is reinstated and has no beneficiary and is not reimbursed, then it has a deductible waiver. (8) If a policyholder has a beneficiary and is retired, then it is uninsurable. Question: Which option holds for Dmitri?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "is subrogated", "has a premium discount", "has a dashcam", "is grandfathered"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a dashcam", "unit_id": "u021069", "pair_id": "u021069-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021069-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "9684d241edd8bc07", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a14", "a7", "a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u021069-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is reimbursed. Dmitri is disputed. Dmitri is not indemnified. Dmitri is reinstated. Dmitri is not inspected. Dmitri is not retired. Dmitri has a beneficiary.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is reinstated and is reimbursed and is disputed, then it has a dashcam. (2) If a policyholder is reinstated and is lapsed and is disputed, then it is subrogated. (3) If a policyholder is indemnified and is not retired and is reimbursed, then it has no flood coverage. (4) If a policyholder is reinstated and is not reimbursed, then it is grandfathered. (5) If a policyholder is not inspected, then it is a smoker. (6) If a policyholder is reinstated and has a beneficiary and has an adjuster, then it has a premium discount. (7) If a policyholder is reinstated and has no beneficiary and is not reimbursed, then it has a deductible waiver. (8) If a policyholder has a beneficiary and is retired, then it is uninsurable. Question: Which option holds for Dmitri?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "is subrogated", "has a premium discount", "has a dashcam", "is grandfathered"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a dashcam", "unit_id": "u021069", "pair_id": "u021069-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021069-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "040e42d9fe27973c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a14", "a7", "a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u021069-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is reimbursed. Dmitri is disputed. Dmitri is not indemnified. Dmitri is reinstated. Dmitri is not inspected. Dmitri is retired. Dmitri has a beneficiary.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is reinstated, and is reimbursed, and is disputed, that policyholder has a dashcam. Item B. When the policyholder is reinstated, and is lapsed, and is disputed, that policyholder is subrogated. Item C. When the policyholder is indemnified, and is not retired, and is reimbursed, that policyholder has no flood coverage. Item D. When the policyholder is reinstated, and is not reimbursed, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item E. When the policyholder is not inspected, that policyholder is a smoker. Item F. When the policyholder is reinstated, and has a beneficiary, and has an adjuster, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item G. When the policyholder is reinstated, and has no beneficiary, and is not reimbursed, that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Item H. When the policyholder has a beneficiary, and is retired, that policyholder is uninsurable. Question: What applies to Dmitri?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "is subrogated", "has a premium discount", "has a dashcam", "is grandfathered"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a dashcam", "unit_id": "u021069", "pair_id": "u021069-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021069-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "9684d241edd8bc07", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a14", "a7", "a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u021069-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is reimbursed. Dmitri is disputed. Dmitri is not indemnified. Dmitri is reinstated. Dmitri is not inspected. Dmitri is not retired. Dmitri has a beneficiary.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is reinstated, and is reimbursed, and is disputed, that policyholder has a dashcam. Item B. When the policyholder is reinstated, and is lapsed, and is disputed, that policyholder is subrogated. Item C. When the policyholder is indemnified, and is not retired, and is reimbursed, that policyholder has no flood coverage. Item D. When the policyholder is reinstated, and is not reimbursed, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item E. When the policyholder is not inspected, that policyholder is a smoker. Item F. When the policyholder is reinstated, and has a beneficiary, and has an adjuster, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item G. When the policyholder is reinstated, and has no beneficiary, and is not reimbursed, that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Item H. When the policyholder has a beneficiary, and is retired, that policyholder is uninsurable. Question: What applies to Dmitri?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "is subrogated", "has a premium discount", "has a dashcam", "is grandfathered"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a dashcam", "unit_id": "u021069", "pair_id": "u021069-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021069-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "040e42d9fe27973c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a14", "a7", "a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u021077-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zora has a mobility rank of 70. Zora is vaccinated. Aurel is allergic. Gunnar has a fever reading of 42. Gunnar is not asthmatic. Wendel is not vaccinated. Gunnar is discharged. Aurel has a mobility rank of 66. Gunnar is allergic. Aurel has a pulse rate of 79. Aurel has a pain level of 91. Gunnar is not vaccinated. Gunnar has a pain level of 40.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient has a fever reading that falls below 50 and likewise has a pulse rate that falls below 54, so it is hypertensive. No. 2 While the given patient has a fever reading that falls below 50 and likewise is discharged, so it is fasting. No. 3 While the given patient has a fever reading that falls below 50 and likewise is asthmatic, so it is rescheduled. No. 4 While the given patient is asthmatic, so it is not fasting. No. 5 While the given patient has a fever reading that falls below 50 and likewise has a mobility rank that exceeds 89 and likewise is vaccinated, so it has a caregiver. No. 6 While the given patient has a pain level that falls below 14, so it is not fasting. No. 7 While the given patient has a fever reading that falls below 50 and likewise has a mobility rank not above 89, so it is anemic. No. 8 While the given patient is allergic, so it has a pacemaker. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given patient has a mobility rank that falls below 14. No. 2 wins over No. 6. No. 4 wins over No. 2. Question: Select what holds for Gunnar: which option?", "options": ["is hypertensive", "has a caregiver", "is anemic", "is rescheduled", "is fasting"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is fasting", "unit_id": "u021077", "pair_id": "u021077-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021077-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a4f6924ce285d897", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a4", "a2", "a0", "a12"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u021077-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zora has a mobility rank of 70. Zora is vaccinated. Aurel is allergic. Gunnar has a fever reading of 42. Gunnar is not asthmatic. Wendel is not vaccinated. Gunnar is discharged. Aurel has a mobility rank of 66. Gunnar is not allergic. Aurel has a pulse rate of 79. Aurel has a pain level of 91. Gunnar is not vaccinated. Gunnar has a pain level of 40.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient has a fever reading that falls below 50 and likewise has a pulse rate that falls below 54, so it is hypertensive. No. 2 While the given patient has a fever reading that falls below 50 and likewise is discharged, so it is fasting. No. 3 While the given patient has a fever reading that falls below 50 and likewise is asthmatic, so it is rescheduled. No. 4 While the given patient is asthmatic, so it is not fasting. No. 5 While the given patient has a fever reading that falls below 50 and likewise has a mobility rank that exceeds 89 and likewise is vaccinated, so it has a caregiver. No. 6 While the given patient has a pain level that falls below 14, so it is not fasting. No. 7 While the given patient has a fever reading that falls below 50 and likewise has a mobility rank not above 89, so it is anemic. No. 8 While the given patient is allergic, so it has a pacemaker. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given patient has a mobility rank that falls below 14. No. 2 wins over No. 6. No. 4 wins over No. 2. Question: Select what holds for Gunnar: which option?", "options": ["is hypertensive", "has a caregiver", "is anemic", "is rescheduled", "is fasting"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is fasting", "unit_id": "u021077", "pair_id": "u021077-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021077-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a8195e93a34bac85", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a4", "a2", "a0", "a12"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u021078-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Talc has a test yield of 24. Shale is not tested. Quartz has a test yield of 62. Shale has a test yield of 26. Talc is tested.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is fuzzed provided that it is reproducible. Section 2: a build is obsolete provided that it has a test yield exceeding 24. Section 3: a build has a migration script provided that it is localized. Section 4: a build is localized provided that it is obsolete. Section 5: a build is reverted provided that it is tested. Section 6: a build is reproducible provided that it has a test yield of 24 or lower. Section 5 lapses for a build if it has a test yield lower than 78. Section 3 lapses for a build if it is tested. Question: Which statement fits Talc?", "options": ["is fuzzed", "is localized"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is fuzzed", "unit_id": "u021078", "pair_id": "u021078-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021078-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "766ddd559a621c00", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a6", "a3"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021078-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Talc has a test yield of 66. Shale is not tested. Quartz has a test yield of 62. Shale has a test yield of 26. Talc is tested.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is fuzzed provided that it is reproducible. Section 2: a build is obsolete provided that it has a test yield exceeding 24. Section 3: a build has a migration script provided that it is localized. Section 4: a build is localized provided that it is obsolete. Section 5: a build is reverted provided that it is tested. Section 6: a build is reproducible provided that it has a test yield of 24 or lower. Section 5 lapses for a build if it has a test yield lower than 78. Section 3 lapses for a build if it is tested. Question: Which statement fits Talc?", "options": ["is fuzzed", "is localized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is localized", "unit_id": "u021078", "pair_id": "u021078-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021078-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6df520147f46c82e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a6", "a3"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021078-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Talc has a test yield of 24. Shale is not tested. Quartz has a test yield of 62. Shale has a test yield of 26. Talc is tested.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is reproducible, it then is fuzzed. #2 Each time a build has a test yield greater than 24, it then is obsolete. #3 Each time a build is localized, it then has a migration script. #4 Each time a build is obsolete, it then is localized. #5 Each time a build is tested, it then is reverted. #6 Each time a build has a test yield of 24 or below, it then is reproducible. #5 is set aside if a build has a test yield less than 78. #3 is set aside if a build is tested. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Talc?", "options": ["is fuzzed", "is localized"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is fuzzed", "unit_id": "u021078", "pair_id": "u021078-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021078-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "766ddd559a621c00", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a6", "a3"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021078-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Talc has a test yield of 66. Shale is not tested. Quartz has a test yield of 62. Shale has a test yield of 26. Talc is tested.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is reproducible, it then is fuzzed. #2 Each time a build has a test yield greater than 24, it then is obsolete. #3 Each time a build is localized, it then has a migration script. #4 Each time a build is obsolete, it then is localized. #5 Each time a build is tested, it then is reverted. #6 Each time a build has a test yield of 24 or below, it then is reproducible. #5 is set aside if a build has a test yield less than 78. #3 is set aside if a build is tested. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Talc?", "options": ["is fuzzed", "is localized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is localized", "unit_id": "u021078", "pair_id": "u021078-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021078-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6df520147f46c82e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a6", "a3"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021085-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is palletized. Ulla has a delivery window of 90. Quentin is not refrigerated. Thilo is not refrigerated. Thilo has a barcode. Thilo has a delivery window of 52. Ulla is refrigerated. Quentin is not palletized. Saskia is palletized. Quentin has a delivery window of 82.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is refrigerated, it also is labeled. Clause 2: once any parcel has a barcode, it also is tracked. Clause 3: once any parcel has a delivery window under 52, it also is weighed. Clause 4: once any parcel has a barcode, it also is stamped. Clause 5: once any parcel is weighed, it also is not scanned. Clause 6: once any parcel is not palletized, it also has no locker slot. Clause 7: once any parcel is labeled, it also is scanned. Question: Does it follow that Thilo is scanned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021085", "pair_id": "u021085-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021085-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e9c8a89669836472", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021085-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is palletized. Ulla has a delivery window of 90. Quentin is not refrigerated. Thilo is not refrigerated. Thilo has a barcode. Thilo has a delivery window of 52. Ulla is refrigerated. Quentin is not palletized. Saskia is palletized. Quentin has a delivery window of 82.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is refrigerated, it also is labeled. Clause 2: once any parcel has a barcode, it also is tracked. Clause 3: once any parcel has a delivery window under 16, it also is weighed. Clause 4: once any parcel has a barcode, it also is stamped. Clause 5: once any parcel is weighed, it also is not scanned. Clause 6: once any parcel is not palletized, it also has no locker slot. Clause 7: once any parcel is labeled, it also is scanned. Question: Does it follow that Thilo is scanned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021085", "pair_id": "u021085-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021085-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "af564fde1f0fb30e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021085-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is palletized. Ulla has a delivery window of 90. Quentin is not refrigerated. Thilo is not refrigerated. Thilo has a barcode. Thilo has a delivery window of 52. Ulla is refrigerated. Quentin is not palletized. Saskia is palletized. Quentin has a delivery window of 82.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is refrigerated, that parcel is labeled. Item B. When the parcel has a barcode, that parcel is tracked. Item C. When the parcel has a delivery window of less than 52, that parcel is weighed. Item D. When the parcel has a barcode, that parcel is stamped. Item E. When the parcel is weighed, that parcel is not scanned. Item F. When the parcel is not palletized, that parcel has no locker slot. Item G. When the parcel is labeled, that parcel is scanned. Question: Can one infer that Thilo is scanned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021085", "pair_id": "u021085-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021085-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e9c8a89669836472", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021085-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is palletized. Ulla has a delivery window of 90. Quentin is not refrigerated. Thilo is not refrigerated. Thilo has a barcode. Thilo has a delivery window of 52. Ulla is refrigerated. Quentin is not palletized. Saskia is palletized. Quentin has a delivery window of 82.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is refrigerated, that parcel is labeled. Item B. When the parcel has a barcode, that parcel is tracked. Item C. When the parcel has a delivery window of less than 16, that parcel is weighed. Item D. When the parcel has a barcode, that parcel is stamped. Item E. When the parcel is weighed, that parcel is not scanned. Item F. When the parcel is not palletized, that parcel has no locker slot. Item G. When the parcel is labeled, that parcel is scanned. Question: Can one infer that Thilo is scanned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021085", "pair_id": "u021085-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021085-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "af564fde1f0fb30e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021088-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not signed. Zircon is linted. Obsidian has a changelog. Zircon has a changelog. Zircon is obsolete. Zircon has no security advisory. Obsidian is documented. Zircon is not experimental. Obsidian is not linted. Obsidian has a security advisory. Zircon is not reproducible. Zircon is profiled. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is experimental while is obsolete while is reproducible, thus it is fuzzed. Provision 2: when the build here has a changelog, thus it is merged. Provision 3: when the build here is not experimental while is linted while is obsolete, thus it is not fuzzed. Provision 4: when the build here has a security advisory while is signed while is documented, thus it is not merged. Provision 5: when the build here has a changelog while is profiled, thus it is benchmarked. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here has a changelog while is signed. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here is signed while is documented. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Zircon is fuzzed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021088", "pair_id": "u021088-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021088-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "36fd763e7d6acb9a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021088-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not signed. Zircon is linted. Obsidian has a changelog. Zircon has a changelog. Zircon is obsolete. Zircon has no security advisory. Obsidian is documented. Zircon is not experimental. Obsidian is not linted. Obsidian has a security advisory. Zircon is not reproducible. Zircon is profiled. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is experimental while is obsolete while is reproducible, thus it is fuzzed. Provision 2: when the build here has a changelog, thus it is merged. Provision 3: when the build here is experimental while is linted while is obsolete, thus it is not fuzzed. Provision 4: when the build here has a security advisory while is signed while is documented, thus it is not merged. Provision 5: when the build here has a changelog while is profiled, thus it is benchmarked. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here has a changelog while is signed. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here is signed while is documented. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Zircon is fuzzed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021088", "pair_id": "u021088-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021088-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e820b3d1471cefcf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021088-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not signed. Zircon is linted. Obsidian has a changelog. Zircon has a changelog. Zircon is obsolete. Zircon has no security advisory. Obsidian is documented. Zircon is not experimental. Obsidian is not linted. Obsidian has a security advisory. Zircon is not reproducible. Zircon is profiled. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is experimental and further is obsolete and further is reproducible, it thereby is fuzzed. Point B. If said build has a changelog, it thereby is merged. Point C. If said build is not experimental and further is linted and further is obsolete, it thereby is not fuzzed. Point D. If said build has a security advisory and further is signed and further is documented, it thereby is not merged. Point E. If said build has a changelog and further is profiled, it thereby is benchmarked. Point A is cancelled if said build has a changelog and further is signed. Point C is cancelled if said build is signed and further is documented. Point D supersedes Point B. Point A supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Zircon is fuzzed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021088", "pair_id": "u021088-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021088-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "36fd763e7d6acb9a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021088-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not signed. Zircon is linted. Obsidian has a changelog. Zircon has a changelog. Zircon is obsolete. Zircon has no security advisory. Obsidian is documented. Zircon is not experimental. Obsidian is not linted. Obsidian has a security advisory. Zircon is not reproducible. Zircon is profiled. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is experimental and further is obsolete and further is reproducible, it thereby is fuzzed. Point B. If said build has a changelog, it thereby is merged. Point C. If said build is experimental and further is linted and further is obsolete, it thereby is not fuzzed. Point D. If said build has a security advisory and further is signed and further is documented, it thereby is not merged. Point E. If said build has a changelog and further is profiled, it thereby is benchmarked. Point A is cancelled if said build has a changelog and further is signed. Point C is cancelled if said build is signed and further is documented. Point D supersedes Point B. Point A supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Zircon is fuzzed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021088", "pair_id": "u021088-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021088-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e820b3d1471cefcf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021088-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not signed. Zircon is linted. Obsidian has a changelog. Zircon has a changelog. Zircon is obsolete. Zircon has no security advisory. Obsidian is documented. Zircon is not experimental. Obsidian is not linted. Obsidian has a security advisory. Zircon is not reproducible. Zircon is profiled. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is experimental and likewise is obsolete and likewise is reproducible, so it is fuzzed. No. 2 While the given build has a changelog, so it is merged. No. 3 While the given build is not experimental and likewise is linted and likewise is obsolete, so it is not fuzzed. No. 4 While the given build has a security advisory and likewise is signed and likewise is documented, so it is not merged. No. 5 While the given build has a changelog and likewise is profiled, so it is benchmarked. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build has a changelog and likewise is signed. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given build is signed and likewise is documented. No. 4 wins over No. 2. No. 1 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Zircon is fuzzed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021088", "pair_id": "u021088-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021088-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "36fd763e7d6acb9a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021088-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not signed. Zircon is linted. Obsidian has a changelog. Zircon has a changelog. Zircon is obsolete. Zircon has no security advisory. Obsidian is documented. Zircon is not experimental. Obsidian is not linted. Obsidian has a security advisory. Zircon is not reproducible. Zircon is profiled. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is experimental and likewise is obsolete and likewise is reproducible, so it is fuzzed. No. 2 While the given build has a changelog, so it is merged. No. 3 While the given build is experimental and likewise is linted and likewise is obsolete, so it is not fuzzed. No. 4 While the given build has a security advisory and likewise is signed and likewise is documented, so it is not merged. No. 5 While the given build has a changelog and likewise is profiled, so it is benchmarked. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build has a changelog and likewise is signed. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given build is signed and likewise is documented. No. 4 wins over No. 2. No. 1 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Zircon is fuzzed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021088", "pair_id": "u021088-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021088-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e820b3d1471cefcf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021111-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is a veteran. Olek has no diploma. Olek has no mentor. Olek is headhunted. Olek is not a graduate. Olek is not onboarded.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is onboarded, it thereby is not recommended. Point B. If said candidate is onboarded and further is eligible and further has a diploma, it thereby has a background screening. Point C. If said candidate has no mentor and further has no diploma and further is not headhunted, it thereby is fingerprinted. Point D. If said candidate has no mentor and further is not eligible and further is not a graduate, it thereby is not fingerprinted. Point E. If said candidate has a mentor and further is not a veteran, it thereby has a portfolio. Question: Statement: Olek is fingerprinted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021111", "pair_id": "u021111-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021111-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "21c8639f2306da67", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021111-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is a veteran. Olek has no diploma. Olek has no mentor. Olek is headhunted. Olek is not a graduate. Olek is not onboarded.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is onboarded, it thereby is not recommended. Point B. If said candidate is onboarded and further is eligible and further has a diploma, it thereby has a background screening. Point C. If said candidate has no mentor and further has no diploma and further is headhunted, it thereby is fingerprinted. Point D. If said candidate has no mentor and further is not eligible and further is not a graduate, it thereby is not fingerprinted. Point E. If said candidate has a mentor and further is not a veteran, it thereby has a portfolio. Question: Statement: Olek is fingerprinted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021111", "pair_id": "u021111-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021111-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "77678557a707fb67", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021129-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar has a team size of 74. Izar has a review mark of 51.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a review mark of at least 88, then it has a steering committee. (2) If a proposal has a postdoc, then it is collaborative. (3) If a proposal has ethics clearance, then it has a postdoc. (4) If a proposal has a team size above 29, then it is renewed. (5) If a proposal has a team size of at most 29, then it is budgeted. (6) If a proposal has a citation index below 73, then it is exploratory. (7) If a proposal has a citation index of at least 73, then it is embargoed. (8) If a proposal has a milestone total of at least 15, then it is a pilot study. (9) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is resubmitted. (10) If a proposal has a review mark of at least 52, then it is longitudinal. (11) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is translational. (3) is void if the proposal has ethics clearance. (8) is void if the proposal is cofunded. (1) is void if the proposal has ethics clearance. (4) is void if the proposal has ethics clearance. Question: Which option holds for Izar?", "options": ["is translational", "is exploratory", "is a pilot study", "has a postdoc", "is renewed", "has a steering committee", "is budgeted", "is embargoed"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is renewed", "unit_id": "u021129", "pair_id": "u021129-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021129-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d69751a05ebd20d8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a15", "a4", "a9", "a8", "a0", "a2", "a14"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021129-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar has a team size of 74. Izar has a review mark of 87.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a review mark of at least 88, then it has a steering committee. (2) If a proposal has a postdoc, then it is collaborative. (3) If a proposal has ethics clearance, then it has a postdoc. (4) If a proposal has a team size above 29, then it is renewed. (5) If a proposal has a team size of at most 29, then it is budgeted. (6) If a proposal has a citation index below 73, then it is exploratory. (7) If a proposal has a citation index of at least 73, then it is embargoed. (8) If a proposal has a milestone total of at least 15, then it is a pilot study. (9) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is resubmitted. (10) If a proposal has a review mark of at least 52, then it is longitudinal. (11) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is translational. (3) is void if the proposal has ethics clearance. (8) is void if the proposal is cofunded. (1) is void if the proposal has ethics clearance. (4) is void if the proposal has ethics clearance. Question: Which option holds for Izar?", "options": ["is translational", "is exploratory", "is a pilot study", "has a postdoc", "is renewed", "has a steering committee", "is budgeted", "is embargoed"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is renewed", "unit_id": "u021129", "pair_id": "u021129-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021129-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b1c6a8a7eb44f0da", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a15", "a4", "a9", "a8", "a0", "a2", "a14"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021129-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar has a team size of 74. Izar has a review mark of 51.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has a review mark of 88 or more, it also has a steering committee. Clause 2: once any proposal has a postdoc, it also is collaborative. Clause 3: once any proposal has ethics clearance, it also has a postdoc. Clause 4: once any proposal has a team size over 29, it also is renewed. Clause 5: once any proposal has a team size of 29 or less, it also is budgeted. Clause 6: once any proposal has a citation index under 73, it also is exploratory. Clause 7: once any proposal has a citation index of 73 or more, it also is embargoed. Clause 8: once any proposal has a milestone total of 15 or more, it also is a pilot study. Clause 9: once any proposal is multicenter, it also is resubmitted. Clause 10: once any proposal has a review mark of 52 or more, it also is longitudinal. Clause 11: once any proposal is cofunded, it also is translational. Clause 3 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has ethics clearance. Clause 8 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is cofunded. Clause 1 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has ethics clearance. Clause 4 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has ethics clearance. Question: Which of these is true of Izar?", "options": ["is translational", "is exploratory", "is a pilot study", "has a postdoc", "is renewed", "has a steering committee", "is budgeted", "is embargoed"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is renewed", "unit_id": "u021129", "pair_id": "u021129-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021129-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d69751a05ebd20d8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a15", "a4", "a9", "a8", "a0", "a2", "a14"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021129-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar has a team size of 74. Izar has a review mark of 87.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has a review mark of 88 or more, it also has a steering committee. Clause 2: once any proposal has a postdoc, it also is collaborative. Clause 3: once any proposal has ethics clearance, it also has a postdoc. Clause 4: once any proposal has a team size over 29, it also is renewed. Clause 5: once any proposal has a team size of 29 or less, it also is budgeted. Clause 6: once any proposal has a citation index under 73, it also is exploratory. Clause 7: once any proposal has a citation index of 73 or more, it also is embargoed. Clause 8: once any proposal has a milestone total of 15 or more, it also is a pilot study. Clause 9: once any proposal is multicenter, it also is resubmitted. Clause 10: once any proposal has a review mark of 52 or more, it also is longitudinal. Clause 11: once any proposal is cofunded, it also is translational. Clause 3 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has ethics clearance. Clause 8 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is cofunded. Clause 1 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has ethics clearance. Clause 4 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has ethics clearance. Question: Which of these is true of Izar?", "options": ["is translational", "is exploratory", "is a pilot study", "has a postdoc", "is renewed", "has a steering committee", "is budgeted", "is embargoed"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is renewed", "unit_id": "u021129", "pair_id": "u021129-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021129-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b1c6a8a7eb44f0da", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a15", "a4", "a9", "a8", "a0", "a2", "a14"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021147-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a security advisory. Zircon is backported. Zircon has a patch cycle of 23. Gneiss is not backported. Mica has a lint backlog of 3. Gneiss has a test yield of 20. Mica has a test yield of 1. Mica has a defect tally of 63. Mica has a security advisory. Mica has a patch cycle of 77.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a lint backlog smaller than 82: then it is notarized. Policy II. Suppose that build is backported plus has a defect tally higher than 52: then it is tested. Policy III. Suppose that build has a test yield smaller than 51 plus has a patch cycle smaller than 35 plus has a lint backlog no higher than 78: then it is not tagged. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a test yield smaller than 51 plus has a patch cycle no lower than 35 plus has a security advisory: then it is tagged. Policy V. Suppose that build has a test yield smaller than 72 plus has a defect tally no lower than 26 plus has a lint backlog higher than 35: then it has no migration script. Policy II is waived if that build is not backported. Policy IV is waived if that build has a test yield no higher than 89 plus has a patch cycle higher than 78. Question: Is it so that Mica is not tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021147", "pair_id": "u021147-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021147-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "21d5aaa4076424b4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021147-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a security advisory. Zircon is backported. Zircon has a patch cycle of 23. Gneiss is not backported. Mica has a lint backlog of 3. Gneiss has a test yield of 20. Mica has a test yield of 1. Mica has a defect tally of 63. Mica has a security advisory. Mica has a patch cycle of 30.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a lint backlog smaller than 82: then it is notarized. Policy II. Suppose that build is backported plus has a defect tally higher than 52: then it is tested. Policy III. Suppose that build has a test yield smaller than 51 plus has a patch cycle smaller than 35 plus has a lint backlog no higher than 78: then it is not tagged. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a test yield smaller than 51 plus has a patch cycle no lower than 35 plus has a security advisory: then it is tagged. Policy V. Suppose that build has a test yield smaller than 72 plus has a defect tally no lower than 26 plus has a lint backlog higher than 35: then it has no migration script. Policy II is waived if that build is not backported. Policy IV is waived if that build has a test yield no higher than 89 plus has a patch cycle higher than 78. Question: Is it so that Mica is not tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021147", "pair_id": "u021147-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021147-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9838bdc6091a6fbe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021147-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a security advisory. Zircon is backported. Zircon has a patch cycle of 23. Gneiss is not backported. Mica has a lint backlog of 3. Gneiss has a test yield of 20. Mica has a test yield of 1. Mica has a defect tally of 63. Mica has a security advisory. Mica has a patch cycle of 77.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a lint backlog less than 82, it then is notarized. #2 Each time a build is backported and additionally has a defect tally greater than 52, it then is tested. #3 Each time a build has a test yield less than 51 and additionally has a patch cycle less than 35 and additionally has a lint backlog of 78 or below, it then is not tagged. #4 Each time a build has a test yield less than 51 and additionally has a patch cycle of 35 or above and additionally has a security advisory, it then is tagged. #5 Each time a build has a test yield less than 72 and additionally has a defect tally of 26 or above and additionally has a lint backlog greater than 35, it then has no migration script. #2 is set aside if a build is not backported. #4 is set aside if a build has a test yield of 89 or below and additionally has a patch cycle greater than 78. Question: Do the terms above show that Mica is not tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021147", "pair_id": "u021147-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021147-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "21d5aaa4076424b4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021147-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a security advisory. Zircon is backported. Zircon has a patch cycle of 23. Gneiss is not backported. Mica has a lint backlog of 3. Gneiss has a test yield of 20. Mica has a test yield of 1. Mica has a defect tally of 63. Mica has a security advisory. Mica has a patch cycle of 30.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a lint backlog less than 82, it then is notarized. #2 Each time a build is backported and additionally has a defect tally greater than 52, it then is tested. #3 Each time a build has a test yield less than 51 and additionally has a patch cycle less than 35 and additionally has a lint backlog of 78 or below, it then is not tagged. #4 Each time a build has a test yield less than 51 and additionally has a patch cycle of 35 or above and additionally has a security advisory, it then is tagged. #5 Each time a build has a test yield less than 72 and additionally has a defect tally of 26 or above and additionally has a lint backlog greater than 35, it then has no migration script. #2 is set aside if a build is not backported. #4 is set aside if a build has a test yield of 89 or below and additionally has a patch cycle greater than 78. Question: Do the terms above show that Mica is not tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021147", "pair_id": "u021147-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021147-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9838bdc6091a6fbe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021149-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not exploratory. Electra has a team size of 95. Hadar has a review mark of 11. Electra is not exploratory. Kochab has no patent filing. Electra has no field site. Capella has a patent filing. Hadar has a patent filing. Hadar is exploratory. Kochab has a review mark of 85. Hadar has a team size of 81. Kochab has a field site. Electra has no patent filing. Kochab has a team size of 0.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has a patent filing plus has a review mark no higher than 11 plus has a team size no lower than 28: then it has no ethics clearance. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is not preregistered plus is exploratory: then it is resubmitted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has a team size higher than 23 plus is exploratory: then it is not preregistered. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is resubmitted plus has a review mark higher than 10: then it has no seed funding. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is resubmitted plus has a review mark no higher than 18 plus has a field site: then it has seed funding. Question: Is it so that Hadar has seed funding?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021149", "pair_id": "u021149-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021149-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "ffc75d9d4a051e9e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u021149-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not exploratory. Electra has a team size of 95. Hadar has a review mark of 11. Electra is not exploratory. Kochab has no patent filing. Electra has no field site. Capella has a patent filing. Hadar has a patent filing. Hadar is exploratory. Kochab has a review mark of 85. Hadar has a team size of 81. Kochab has a field site. Electra has no patent filing. Kochab has a team size of 0.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has a patent filing plus has a review mark no higher than 11 plus has a team size no lower than 28: then it has no ethics clearance. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is not preregistered plus is exploratory: then it is resubmitted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has a team size higher than 23 plus is exploratory: then it is not preregistered. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is resubmitted plus has a review mark higher than 18: then it has no seed funding. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is resubmitted plus has a review mark no higher than 18 plus has a field site: then it has seed funding. Question: Is it so that Hadar has seed funding?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021149", "pair_id": "u021149-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021149-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "9feffd25eb139f30", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u021149-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not exploratory. Electra has a team size of 95. Hadar has a review mark of 11. Electra is not exploratory. Kochab has no patent filing. Electra has no field site. Capella has a patent filing. Hadar has a patent filing. Hadar is exploratory. Kochab has a review mark of 85. Hadar has a team size of 81. Kochab has a field site. Electra has no patent filing. Kochab has a team size of 0.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has a patent filing and additionally has a review mark of 11 or below and additionally has a team size of 28 or above, it then has no ethics clearance. #2 Each time a proposal is not preregistered and additionally is exploratory, it then is resubmitted. #3 Each time a proposal has a team size greater than 23 and additionally is exploratory, it then is not preregistered. #4 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally has a review mark greater than 10, it then has no seed funding. #5 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally has a review mark of 18 or below and additionally has a field site, it then has seed funding. Question: Do the terms above show that Hadar has seed funding?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021149", "pair_id": "u021149-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021149-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "ffc75d9d4a051e9e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u021149-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not exploratory. Electra has a team size of 95. Hadar has a review mark of 11. Electra is not exploratory. Kochab has no patent filing. Electra has no field site. Capella has a patent filing. Hadar has a patent filing. Hadar is exploratory. Kochab has a review mark of 85. Hadar has a team size of 81. Kochab has a field site. Electra has no patent filing. Kochab has a team size of 0.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has a patent filing and additionally has a review mark of 11 or below and additionally has a team size of 28 or above, it then has no ethics clearance. #2 Each time a proposal is not preregistered and additionally is exploratory, it then is resubmitted. #3 Each time a proposal has a team size greater than 23 and additionally is exploratory, it then is not preregistered. #4 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally has a review mark greater than 18, it then has no seed funding. #5 Each time a proposal is resubmitted and additionally has a review mark of 18 or below and additionally has a field site, it then has seed funding. Question: Do the terms above show that Hadar has seed funding?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021149", "pair_id": "u021149-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021149-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "9feffd25eb139f30", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u021153-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar is not tagged. Pumice is not localized. Feldspar is not compiled. Gneiss is not localized. Quartz is tagged. Feldspar is not localized. Quartz has a defect tally of 25. Quartz is compiled. Pumice is not compiled. Gneiss has a defect tally of 86. Gneiss is not fuzzed. Pumice has a defect tally of 18.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is localized and also has a defect tally under 50 and also is not tagged, it also is not notarized. Question: Does it follow that Gneiss is not compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021153", "pair_id": "u021153-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/11", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021153-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "19ae85fe1a3106f2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021153-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar is not tagged. Pumice is not localized. Feldspar is not compiled. Gneiss is not localized. Quartz is tagged. Feldspar is not localized. Quartz has a defect tally of 25. Quartz is compiled. Pumice is not compiled. Gneiss has a defect tally of 86. Gneiss is not fuzzed. Gneiss is compiled. Pumice has a defect tally of 18.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is localized and also has a defect tally under 50 and also is not tagged, it also is not notarized. Question: Does it follow that Gneiss is not compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021153", "pair_id": "u021153-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/11", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021153-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1c5e51efe5a35454", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021156-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not bilingual. Mads is recommended. Kalle is not bonded. Olek is not headhunted. Kalle is sponsored. Mads is bonded. Kalle has no visa. Lotte is headhunted. Kalle is not recommended. Olek is not sponsored. Olek is bilingual. Lotte is not recommended. Olek is not recommended. Mads is not headhunted. Lotte has a visa.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not certified provided that it is bonded. Section 2: a candidate has no diploma provided that it is headhunted. Section 3: a candidate has a diploma provided that it is bilingual. Section 4: a candidate has a mentor provided that it is certified. Section 5: a candidate has no mentor provided that it is certified. Section 6: a candidate has a background screening provided that it has a mentor. Section 7: a candidate is certified provided that it is not recommended. Section 5 lapses for a candidate if it is headhunted. Section 5 lapses for a candidate if it is bonded. Section 4 lapses for a candidate if it is sponsored. Section 1 lapses for a candidate if it has a visa. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 7. Question: Kalle has a mentor. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021156", "pair_id": "u021156-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021156-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5182db3ba47c7c92", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 21}}
{"id": "syn-u021156-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not bilingual. Mads is recommended. Kalle is not bonded. Olek is not headhunted. Kalle is sponsored. Mads is bonded. Kalle has no visa. Lotte is headhunted. Kalle is not recommended. Olek is not sponsored. Olek is bilingual. Lotte is not recommended. Olek is not recommended. Mads is not headhunted. Lotte has a visa.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not certified provided that it is bonded. Section 2: a candidate has no diploma provided that it is headhunted. Section 3: a candidate has a diploma provided that it is bilingual. Section 4: a candidate has a mentor provided that it is certified. Section 5: a candidate has no mentor provided that it is certified. Section 6: a candidate has a background screening provided that it has a mentor. Section 7: a candidate is certified provided that it is recommended. Section 5 lapses for a candidate if it is headhunted. Section 5 lapses for a candidate if it is bonded. Section 4 lapses for a candidate if it is sponsored. Section 1 lapses for a candidate if it has a visa. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 7. Question: Kalle has a mentor. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021156", "pair_id": "u021156-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021156-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b778989cc8b507bd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 21}}
{"id": "syn-u021195-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper has a GPU. Vesper is not idle. Vesper is throttled. Zephyr is not throttled. Vesper is sandboxed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload has no public endpoint provided that it is deprecated as well as is throttled. Section 2: a workload is deprecated provided that it is virtualized. Section 3: a workload is mirrored provided that it is sandboxed. Section 4: a workload has a public endpoint provided that it is deprecated as well as is throttled as well as is idle. Section 5: a workload is virtualized provided that it has a GPU. Question: Vesper has a public endpoint. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021195", "pair_id": "u021195-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021195-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "45ffbd65ffd2d9b7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u021195-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper has a GPU. Vesper is not idle. Vesper is throttled. Zephyr is not throttled. Vesper is sandboxed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload has no public endpoint provided that it is deprecated as well as is not throttled. Section 2: a workload is deprecated provided that it is virtualized. Section 3: a workload is mirrored provided that it is sandboxed. Section 4: a workload has a public endpoint provided that it is deprecated as well as is throttled as well as is idle. Section 5: a workload is virtualized provided that it has a GPU. Question: Vesper has a public endpoint. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021195", "pair_id": "u021195-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021195-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "4795dcdafc26dbad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u021195-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper has a GPU. Vesper is not idle. Vesper is throttled. Zephyr is not throttled. Vesper is sandboxed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is deprecated and additionally is throttled, it then has no public endpoint. #2 Each time a workload is virtualized, it then is deprecated. #3 Each time a workload is sandboxed, it then is mirrored. #4 Each time a workload is deprecated and additionally is throttled and additionally is idle, it then has a public endpoint. #5 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is virtualized. Question: Do the terms above show that Vesper has a public endpoint?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021195", "pair_id": "u021195-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021195-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "45ffbd65ffd2d9b7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u021195-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper has a GPU. Vesper is not idle. Vesper is throttled. Zephyr is not throttled. Vesper is sandboxed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is deprecated and additionally is not throttled, it then has no public endpoint. #2 Each time a workload is virtualized, it then is deprecated. #3 Each time a workload is sandboxed, it then is mirrored. #4 Each time a workload is deprecated and additionally is throttled and additionally is idle, it then has a public endpoint. #5 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is virtualized. Question: Do the terms above show that Vesper has a public endpoint?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021195", "pair_id": "u021195-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021195-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "4795dcdafc26dbad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u021226-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo has no courier. Thilo is not scanned. Kaveh has a barcode. Kaveh is not prepaid. Priya is not refrigerated. Kaveh is scanned. Kaveh is refrigerated. Priya has a courier. Kaveh has no courier. Thilo is not prepaid.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is not scanned and likewise has no courier, so it is labeled. No. 2 While the given parcel is labeled and likewise is not refrigerated, so it is not palletized. No. 3 While the given parcel is labeled and likewise is refrigerated, so it is palletized. No. 4 While the given parcel has no barcode and likewise is not prepaid, so it has a locker slot. Question: Is the claim \"Kaveh is not palletized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021226", "pair_id": "u021226-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021226-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "430deb6dae607b6a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021226-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo has no courier. Thilo is not scanned. Kaveh has a barcode. Kaveh is not prepaid. Priya is not refrigerated. Kaveh is scanned. Kaveh is refrigerated. Priya has a courier. Kaveh has no courier. Thilo is not prepaid.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is scanned and likewise has no courier, so it is labeled. No. 2 While the given parcel is labeled and likewise is not refrigerated, so it is not palletized. No. 3 While the given parcel is labeled and likewise is refrigerated, so it is palletized. No. 4 While the given parcel has no barcode and likewise is not prepaid, so it has a locker slot. Question: Is the claim \"Kaveh is not palletized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021226", "pair_id": "u021226-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021226-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "9c55a4236713a4ef", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021257-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is registered. Thilo is fragile.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is stamped provided that it is tracked. Section 2: a parcel is not consolidated provided that it has a courier. Section 3: a parcel is consolidated provided that it is stamped. Section 4: a parcel has a courier provided that it is misrouted. Section 5: a parcel is tracked provided that it has a locker slot. Section 6: a parcel is misrouted provided that it is fragile. Question: Thilo is consolidated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021257", "pair_id": "u021257-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021257-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "94bb61f23515d607", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021257-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is registered. Thilo is fragile.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is stamped provided that it is tracked. Section 2: a parcel is not consolidated provided that it has a courier. Section 3: a parcel is consolidated provided that it is stamped. Section 4: a parcel has a courier provided that it is misrouted. Section 5: a parcel is not palletized provided that it is registered. Section 6: a parcel is tracked provided that it has a locker slot. Section 7: a parcel is misrouted provided that it is fragile. Question: Thilo is consolidated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021257", "pair_id": "u021257-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021257-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "92b47ba0bc7dc40f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021257-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is registered. Thilo is fragile.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is stamped. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a courier: then it is not consolidated. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is stamped: then it is consolidated. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it has a courier. Policy V. Suppose that parcel has a locker slot: then it is tracked. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is misrouted. Question: Is it so that Thilo is consolidated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021257", "pair_id": "u021257-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021257-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "94bb61f23515d607", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021257-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is registered. Thilo is fragile.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is stamped. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a courier: then it is not consolidated. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is stamped: then it is consolidated. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is misrouted: then it has a courier. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is registered: then it is not palletized. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel has a locker slot: then it is tracked. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is misrouted. Question: Is it so that Thilo is consolidated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021257", "pair_id": "u021257-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021257-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "92b47ba0bc7dc40f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021273-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Folke has a repayment grade of 52. Wiebke has a credit rating of 16. Wiebke is delinquent. Folke has a credit rating of 72. Folke is audited. Wiebke has a repayment grade of 92. Wiebke is not creditworthy. Wiebke is bankrupt. Wiebke is audited.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is bankrupt and is delinquent and is creditworthy, then it is a homeowner. (2) If a borrower is bankrupt and has a repayment grade above 81 and is delinquent, then it has a lien. (3) If a borrower is audited, then it is not foreclosed. (4) If a borrower is bankrupt and has a credit rating above 35, then it has an escrow account. (5) If a borrower is bankrupt and has a repayment grade of at most 81, then it has a mortgage. (6) If a borrower is bankrupt and has a debt ratio of at most 52 and is creditworthy, then it is underwritten. (3) is void if the borrower is delinquent. (6) is void if the borrower is delinquent. Question: Which option holds for Wiebke?", "options": ["is a homeowner", "has a lien", "has a mortgage", "is underwritten", "has an escrow account"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a lien", "unit_id": "u021273", "pair_id": "u021273-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021273-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6ac08ad7992180da", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a10", "a7", "a9", "a4", "a0"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u021273-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Folke has a repayment grade of 52. Wiebke has a credit rating of 16. Wiebke is delinquent. Folke has a credit rating of 18. Folke is audited. Wiebke has a repayment grade of 92. Wiebke is not creditworthy. Wiebke is bankrupt. Wiebke is audited.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is bankrupt and is delinquent and is creditworthy, then it is a homeowner. (2) If a borrower is bankrupt and has a repayment grade above 81 and is delinquent, then it has a lien. (3) If a borrower is audited, then it is not foreclosed. (4) If a borrower is bankrupt and has a credit rating above 35, then it has an escrow account. (5) If a borrower is bankrupt and has a repayment grade of at most 81, then it has a mortgage. (6) If a borrower is bankrupt and has a debt ratio of at most 52 and is creditworthy, then it is underwritten. (3) is void if the borrower is delinquent. (6) is void if the borrower is delinquent. Question: Which option holds for Wiebke?", "options": ["is a homeowner", "has a lien", "has a mortgage", "is underwritten", "has an escrow account"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a lien", "unit_id": "u021273", "pair_id": "u021273-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021273-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d3e9f998f25cc14e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a10", "a7", "a9", "a4", "a0"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u021273-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Folke has a repayment grade of 52. Wiebke has a credit rating of 16. Wiebke is delinquent. Folke has a credit rating of 72. Folke is audited. Wiebke has a repayment grade of 92. Wiebke is not creditworthy. Wiebke is bankrupt. Wiebke is audited.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is bankrupt and also is delinquent and also is creditworthy, it also is a homeowner. Clause 2: once any borrower is bankrupt and also has a repayment grade over 81 and also is delinquent, it also has a lien. Clause 3: once any borrower is audited, it also is not foreclosed. Clause 4: once any borrower is bankrupt and also has a credit rating over 35, it also has an escrow account. Clause 5: once any borrower is bankrupt and also has a repayment grade of 81 or less, it also has a mortgage. Clause 6: once any borrower is bankrupt and also has a debt ratio of 52 or less and also is creditworthy, it also is underwritten. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is delinquent. Clause 6 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is delinquent. Question: Which of these is true of Wiebke?", "options": ["is a homeowner", "has a lien", "has a mortgage", "is underwritten", "has an escrow account"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a lien", "unit_id": "u021273", "pair_id": "u021273-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021273-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6ac08ad7992180da", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a10", "a7", "a9", "a4", "a0"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u021273-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Folke has a repayment grade of 52. Wiebke has a credit rating of 16. Wiebke is delinquent. Folke has a credit rating of 18. Folke is audited. Wiebke has a repayment grade of 92. Wiebke is not creditworthy. Wiebke is bankrupt. Wiebke is audited.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is bankrupt and also is delinquent and also is creditworthy, it also is a homeowner. Clause 2: once any borrower is bankrupt and also has a repayment grade over 81 and also is delinquent, it also has a lien. Clause 3: once any borrower is audited, it also is not foreclosed. Clause 4: once any borrower is bankrupt and also has a credit rating over 35, it also has an escrow account. Clause 5: once any borrower is bankrupt and also has a repayment grade of 81 or less, it also has a mortgage. Clause 6: once any borrower is bankrupt and also has a debt ratio of 52 or less and also is creditworthy, it also is underwritten. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is delinquent. Clause 6 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is delinquent. Question: Which of these is true of Wiebke?", "options": ["is a homeowner", "has a lien", "has a mortgage", "is underwritten", "has an escrow account"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a lien", "unit_id": "u021273", "pair_id": "u021273-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021273-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d3e9f998f25cc14e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a10", "a7", "a9", "a4", "a0"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u021274-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf has a pacemaker. Yusuf is rescheduled. Aurel is rescheduled. Aurel has a pacemaker. Florin is rescheduled.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is rescheduled, thus it is allergic. Provision 2: when the patient here is not bedridden, thus it is postoperative. Provision 3: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it has an interpreter. Provision 4: when the patient here is rescheduled, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 5: when the patient here is hypertensive, thus it is bedridden. Provision 6: when the patient here is not rescheduled, thus it is discharged. Provision 7: when the patient here is discharged, thus it is admitted. Provision 2 has no effect when the patient here has a pacemaker. Question: Which one describes Yusuf?", "options": ["is bedridden", "is admitted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is bedridden", "unit_id": "u021274", "pair_id": "u021274-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021274-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c91b81143a027950", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u021274-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf has no pacemaker. Yusuf is rescheduled. Aurel is rescheduled. Aurel has a pacemaker. Florin is rescheduled.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is rescheduled, thus it is allergic. Provision 2: when the patient here is not bedridden, thus it is postoperative. Provision 3: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it has an interpreter. Provision 4: when the patient here is rescheduled, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 5: when the patient here is hypertensive, thus it is bedridden. Provision 6: when the patient here is not rescheduled, thus it is discharged. Provision 7: when the patient here is discharged, thus it is admitted. Provision 2 has no effect when the patient here has a pacemaker. Question: Which one describes Yusuf?", "options": ["is bedridden", "is admitted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is bedridden", "unit_id": "u021274", "pair_id": "u021274-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021274-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fda3bb50008af4de", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u021274-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf has a pacemaker. Yusuf is rescheduled. Aurel is rescheduled. Aurel has a pacemaker. Florin is rescheduled.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is allergic. Point B. If said patient is not bedridden, it thereby is postoperative. Point C. If said patient has a pacemaker, it thereby has an interpreter. Point D. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is hypertensive. Point E. If said patient is hypertensive, it thereby is bedridden. Point F. If said patient is not rescheduled, it thereby is discharged. Point G. If said patient is discharged, it thereby is admitted. Point B is cancelled if said patient has a pacemaker. Question: Which choice is true for Yusuf?", "options": ["is bedridden", "is admitted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is bedridden", "unit_id": "u021274", "pair_id": "u021274-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021274-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c91b81143a027950", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u021274-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf has no pacemaker. Yusuf is rescheduled. Aurel is rescheduled. Aurel has a pacemaker. Florin is rescheduled.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is allergic. Point B. If said patient is not bedridden, it thereby is postoperative. Point C. If said patient has a pacemaker, it thereby has an interpreter. Point D. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is hypertensive. Point E. If said patient is hypertensive, it thereby is bedridden. Point F. If said patient is not rescheduled, it thereby is discharged. Point G. If said patient is discharged, it thereby is admitted. Point B is cancelled if said patient has a pacemaker. Question: Which choice is true for Yusuf?", "options": ["is bedridden", "is admitted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is bedridden", "unit_id": "u021274", "pair_id": "u021274-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021274-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fda3bb50008af4de", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u021274-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf has a pacemaker. Yusuf is rescheduled. Aurel is rescheduled. Aurel has a pacemaker. Florin is rescheduled.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is rescheduled, so it is allergic. No. 2 While the given patient is not bedridden, so it is postoperative. No. 3 While the given patient has a pacemaker, so it has an interpreter. No. 4 While the given patient is rescheduled, so it is hypertensive. No. 5 While the given patient is hypertensive, so it is bedridden. No. 6 While the given patient is not rescheduled, so it is discharged. No. 7 While the given patient is discharged, so it is admitted. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given patient has a pacemaker. Question: Select what holds for Yusuf: which option?", "options": ["is bedridden", "is admitted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is bedridden", "unit_id": "u021274", "pair_id": "u021274-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021274-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c91b81143a027950", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u021274-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf has no pacemaker. Yusuf is rescheduled. Aurel is rescheduled. Aurel has a pacemaker. Florin is rescheduled.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is rescheduled, so it is allergic. No. 2 While the given patient is not bedridden, so it is postoperative. No. 3 While the given patient has a pacemaker, so it has an interpreter. No. 4 While the given patient is rescheduled, so it is hypertensive. No. 5 While the given patient is hypertensive, so it is bedridden. No. 6 While the given patient is not rescheduled, so it is discharged. No. 7 While the given patient is discharged, so it is admitted. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given patient has a pacemaker. Question: Select what holds for Yusuf: which option?", "options": ["is bedridden", "is admitted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is bedridden", "unit_id": "u021274", "pair_id": "u021274-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021274-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fda3bb50008af4de", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u021284-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo has a payout ceiling of 33. Celeste has no adjuster. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 72. Viggo has no rider. Viggo has no adjuster.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is inspected: then it is not litigated. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has no rider: then it is reimbursed. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed: then it is covered. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is uninsurable: then it is inspected. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has a payout ceiling no higher than 55: then it has no flood coverage. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder has a rider: then it is uninsurable. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder has no adjuster: then it is not disputed. Question: Which choice is right for Viggo?", "options": ["is inspected", "is covered"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is covered", "unit_id": "u021284", "pair_id": "u021284-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021284-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8d4c3af55343d96e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a7"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u021284-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo has a payout ceiling of 33. Celeste has no adjuster. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 72. Viggo has a rider. Viggo has no adjuster.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is inspected: then it is not litigated. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has no rider: then it is reimbursed. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed: then it is covered. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is uninsurable: then it is inspected. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has a payout ceiling no higher than 55: then it has no flood coverage. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder has a rider: then it is uninsurable. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder has no adjuster: then it is not disputed. Question: Which choice is right for Viggo?", "options": ["is inspected", "is covered"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is inspected", "unit_id": "u021284", "pair_id": "u021284-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021284-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "7da149b2fd12fc70", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a7"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u021284-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo has a payout ceiling of 33. Celeste has no adjuster. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 72. Viggo has no rider. Viggo has no adjuster.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is inspected, it then is not litigated. #2 Each time a policyholder has no rider, it then is reimbursed. #3 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then is covered. #4 Each time a policyholder is uninsurable, it then is inspected. #5 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling of 55 or below, it then has no flood coverage. #6 Each time a policyholder has a rider, it then is uninsurable. #7 Each time a policyholder has no adjuster, it then is not disputed. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Viggo?", "options": ["is inspected", "is covered"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is covered", "unit_id": "u021284", "pair_id": "u021284-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021284-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8d4c3af55343d96e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a7"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u021284-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo has a payout ceiling of 33. Celeste has no adjuster. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 72. Viggo has a rider. Viggo has no adjuster.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is inspected, it then is not litigated. #2 Each time a policyholder has no rider, it then is reimbursed. #3 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then is covered. #4 Each time a policyholder is uninsurable, it then is inspected. #5 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling of 55 or below, it then has no flood coverage. #6 Each time a policyholder has a rider, it then is uninsurable. #7 Each time a policyholder has no adjuster, it then is not disputed. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Viggo?", "options": ["is inspected", "is covered"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is inspected", "unit_id": "u021284", "pair_id": "u021284-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021284-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "7da149b2fd12fc70", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a7"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u021333-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice is not notarized. Schist is notarized. Schist has a test yield of 76. Schist is not experimental. Pumice has no security advisory. Pumice is experimental. Pumice is not fuzzed. Schist is not fuzzed. Schist has no security advisory.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is localized while is experimental, thus it is flaky. Provision 2: when the build here is notarized, thus it is localized. Provision 3: when the build here is localized while has a test yield at or below 55 while is fuzzed, thus it is obsolete. Provision 4: when the build here has a security advisory, thus it has a changelog. Provision 5: when the build here is localized while is not experimental, thus it is versioned. Question: Which one describes Schist?", "options": ["is flaky", "is obsolete", "is versioned"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is versioned", "unit_id": "u021333", "pair_id": "u021333-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021333-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "47c782e5b519b50a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a9", "a0"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u021333-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice is not notarized. Schist is notarized. Schist has a test yield of 76. Schist is not experimental. Pumice has no security advisory. Pumice is experimental. Pumice is not fuzzed. Schist is not fuzzed. Schist has a security advisory.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is localized while is experimental, thus it is flaky. Provision 2: when the build here is notarized, thus it is localized. Provision 3: when the build here is localized while has a test yield at or below 55 while is fuzzed, thus it is obsolete. Provision 4: when the build here has a security advisory, thus it has a changelog. Provision 5: when the build here is localized while is not experimental, thus it is versioned. Question: Which one describes Schist?", "options": ["is flaky", "is obsolete", "is versioned"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is versioned", "unit_id": "u021333", "pair_id": "u021333-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021333-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "3669af6bc6c37d4a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a9", "a0"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u021369-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is not covered. Fabian has no deductible waiver. Yara is covered. Fabian has an adjuster. Yara has no deductible waiver. Fabian is uninsurable. Fabian has no dashcam. Yara is uninsurable. Yara has an adjuster.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has an adjuster, it thereby is reimbursed. Point B. If said policyholder is uninsurable and further is covered and further has a dashcam, it thereby is not appraised. Point C. If said policyholder is uninsurable and further has no dashcam, it thereby is appraised. Point C is cancelled if said policyholder has a deductible waiver and further is litigated. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder has a dashcam. Question: Statement: Fabian is appraised. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021369", "pair_id": "u021369-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021369-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d087462fa5a24c7c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u021369-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is not covered. Fabian has no deductible waiver. Yara is covered. Fabian has an adjuster. Yara has no deductible waiver. Fabian is uninsurable. Fabian has no dashcam. Yara is uninsurable. Yara has an adjuster.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has an adjuster, it thereby is reimbursed. Point B. If said policyholder is uninsurable and further is covered and further has a dashcam, it thereby is not appraised. Point C. If said policyholder is uninsurable and further has a dashcam, it thereby is appraised. Point C is cancelled if said policyholder has a deductible waiver and further is litigated. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder has a dashcam. Question: Statement: Fabian is appraised. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021369", "pair_id": "u021369-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021369-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b17c630419f3b06a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u021404-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar has no firewall. Quasar is virtualized. Quasar is not monitored. Quasar has no snapshot. Quasar has no public endpoint. Quasar is replicated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is replicated plus is not monitored: then it is patched. Policy II. Suppose that workload has a public endpoint: then it is cached. Policy III. Suppose that workload is replicated plus is autoscaled: then it is not patched. Policy IV. Suppose that workload has a firewall: then it is not sharded. Policy V. Suppose that workload is patched plus is virtualized: then it is not provisioned. Policy V is waived if that workload is monitored. Policy III is waived if that workload has a snapshot. Question: Is it so that Quasar is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021404", "pair_id": "u021404-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021404-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f613b9a331d163d6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 32}}
{"id": "syn-u021404-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar has no firewall. Quasar is virtualized. Quasar is not monitored. Quasar has no snapshot. Quasar has no public endpoint. Quasar is replicated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is replicated plus is monitored: then it is patched. Policy II. Suppose that workload has a public endpoint: then it is cached. Policy III. Suppose that workload is replicated plus is autoscaled: then it is not patched. Policy IV. Suppose that workload has a firewall: then it is not sharded. Policy V. Suppose that workload is patched plus is virtualized: then it is not provisioned. Policy V is waived if that workload is monitored. Policy III is waived if that workload has a snapshot. Question: Is it so that Quasar is patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021404", "pair_id": "u021404-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021404-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0d6928c0e5f75f1c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 32}}
{"id": "syn-u021489-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar has a defect tally of 57. Basalt has a patch cycle of 69. Feldspar has a test yield of 19.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a patch cycle of maximum 26, it thereby is signed. Point B. If said build is profiled, it thereby is reverted. Point C. If said build has a patch cycle of maximum 40, it thereby is benchmarked. Point D. If said build is minified, it thereby is profiled. Point E. If said build has a defect tally of maximum 74, it thereby is documented. Point F. If said build is documented, it thereby is backported. Point G. If said build is experimental, it thereby is tagged. Point H. If said build has a defect tally in excess of 74, it thereby is minified. Point I. If said build is signed, it thereby is experimental. Point J. If said build has a feature toggle, it thereby has no security advisory. Point K. If said build is backported, it thereby has a changelog. Point L. If said build has a test yield of maximum 83, it thereby has no migration script. Point J is cancelled if said build has a patch cycle short of 16. Point L is cancelled if said build has a patch cycle short of 11. Question: Which choice is true for Feldspar?", "options": ["has a changelog", "is reverted", "is tagged"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a changelog", "unit_id": "u021489", "pair_id": "u021489-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021489-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0f7c7a84c4a27080", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a11", "a1"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u021489-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar has a defect tally of 96. Basalt has a patch cycle of 69. Feldspar has a test yield of 19.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a patch cycle of maximum 26, it thereby is signed. Point B. If said build is profiled, it thereby is reverted. Point C. If said build has a patch cycle of maximum 40, it thereby is benchmarked. Point D. If said build is minified, it thereby is profiled. Point E. If said build has a defect tally of maximum 74, it thereby is documented. Point F. If said build is documented, it thereby is backported. Point G. If said build is experimental, it thereby is tagged. Point H. If said build has a defect tally in excess of 74, it thereby is minified. Point I. If said build is signed, it thereby is experimental. Point J. If said build has a feature toggle, it thereby has no security advisory. Point K. If said build is backported, it thereby has a changelog. Point L. If said build has a test yield of maximum 83, it thereby has no migration script. Point J is cancelled if said build has a patch cycle short of 16. Point L is cancelled if said build has a patch cycle short of 11. Question: Which choice is true for Feldspar?", "options": ["has a changelog", "is reverted", "is tagged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reverted", "unit_id": "u021489", "pair_id": "u021489-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021489-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "142c0c9ee03ae833", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a11", "a1"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u021538-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Thilo has a delivery window of 16. Thilo is hazardous. Quentin is not hazardous. Quentin is not prepaid. Quentin has a delivery window of 18.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel has a parcel volume over 16, it also is undeliverable. Clause 2: once any parcel has a delivery window of 19 or more, it also is oversized. Clause 3: once any parcel has a weight class over 15, it also has a locker slot. Clause 4: once any parcel has a delivery window under 84, it also is delayed. Clause 5: once any parcel has a parcel volume of 16 or less, it also is refrigerated. Clause 6: once any parcel is prepaid, it also is weighed. Clause 7: once any parcel has a waybill, it also is not labeled. Clause 8: once any parcel has a weight class of 15 or less, it also is tracked. Clause 9: once any parcel is hazardous, it also is palletized. Clause 10: once any parcel has a delivery window under 19, it also is registered. Question: Which of these is true of Quentin?", "options": ["is oversized", "is tracked", "is undeliverable", "is refrigerated", "is registered", "is palletized", "has a locker slot"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is registered", "unit_id": "u021538", "pair_id": "u021538-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021538-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "a4a6c7b24112792c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a2", "a7", "a4", "a14", "a15", "a11"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021538-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Thilo has a delivery window of 16. Thilo is hazardous. Quentin is not hazardous. Quentin is not prepaid. Quentin has a delivery window of 47.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel has a parcel volume over 16, it also is undeliverable. Clause 2: once any parcel has a delivery window of 19 or more, it also is oversized. Clause 3: once any parcel has a weight class over 15, it also has a locker slot. Clause 4: once any parcel has a delivery window under 84, it also is delayed. Clause 5: once any parcel has a parcel volume of 16 or less, it also is refrigerated. Clause 6: once any parcel is prepaid, it also is weighed. Clause 7: once any parcel has a waybill, it also is not labeled. Clause 8: once any parcel has a weight class of 15 or less, it also is tracked. Clause 9: once any parcel is hazardous, it also is palletized. Clause 10: once any parcel has a delivery window under 19, it also is registered. Question: Which of these is true of Quentin?", "options": ["is oversized", "is tracked", "is undeliverable", "is refrigerated", "is registered", "is palletized", "has a locker slot"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is oversized", "unit_id": "u021538", "pair_id": "u021538-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021538-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "f82eaef4612f7a79", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a2", "a7", "a4", "a14", "a15", "a11"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021546-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse is refinanced. Ilse has a cosigner. Ilse has collateral.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has a lien: then it is pensioned. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has a cosigner: then it is bankrupt. Policy III. Suppose that borrower has no collateral: then it has a guarantor. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a lien: then it is not pensioned. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is not refinanced: then it is not vetted. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it has a lien. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has no collateral: then it has no guarantor. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower is not amortized: then it is vetted. Policy IV is waived if that borrower is amortized. Policy VII is waived if that borrower is not employed. Policy I is waived if that borrower is not amortized. Policy IV is waived if that borrower has no collateral. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Ilse is not pensioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021546", "pair_id": "u021546-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021546-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1134f732adb38040", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u021546-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse is refinanced. Ilse is not amortized. Ilse has a cosigner. Ilse has collateral.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has a lien: then it is pensioned. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has a cosigner: then it is bankrupt. Policy III. Suppose that borrower has no collateral: then it has a guarantor. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a lien: then it is not pensioned. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is not refinanced: then it is not vetted. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it has a lien. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has no collateral: then it has no guarantor. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower is not amortized: then it is vetted. Policy IV is waived if that borrower is amortized. Policy VII is waived if that borrower is not employed. Policy I is waived if that borrower is not amortized. Policy IV is waived if that borrower has no collateral. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Ilse is not pensioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021546", "pair_id": "u021546-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021546-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d3fb0dbd851f087b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u021619-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not palletized. Nandor has a parcel volume of 8. Nandor is not palletized. Saskia has a postal zone of 58. Mirela has a weight class of 85. Jory is not prepaid. Nandor is not prepaid. Mirela is not palletized. Jory has a weight class of 3. Mirela has a postal zone of 83. Nandor has a weight class of 71. Nandor is undeliverable. Nandor has a delivery window of 43. Mirela is prepaid. Jory is undeliverable.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is oversized and has a weight class above 35, then it is not perishable. (2) If a parcel is delayed and is undeliverable and has a delivery window below 13, then it is stamped. (3) If a parcel has a weight class below 54 and has a delivery window above 42, then it is tracked. (4) If a parcel is delayed and is not undeliverable and is palletized, then it is not stamped. (5) If a parcel is oversized and has a parcel volume of at most 58, then it is delayed. (6) If a parcel has a parcel volume of at most 75, then it is oversized. (7) If a parcel is prepaid and is undeliverable, then it has no locker slot. (3) is void if the parcel has a delivery window of at most 71. (5) is void if the parcel has a postal zone below 51 and has a delivery window of at least 86. Question: Is it true that Nandor is stamped?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021619", "pair_id": "u021619-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021619-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "76e0cdaa758bf00f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021619-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not palletized. Nandor has a parcel volume of 8. Nandor is not palletized. Saskia has a postal zone of 58. Mirela has a weight class of 85. Jory is not prepaid. Nandor is not prepaid. Mirela is not palletized. Jory has a weight class of 3. Mirela has a postal zone of 83. Nandor has a weight class of 71. Nandor is undeliverable. Nandor has a delivery window of 5. Mirela is prepaid. Jory is undeliverable.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is oversized and has a weight class above 35, then it is not perishable. (2) If a parcel is delayed and is undeliverable and has a delivery window below 13, then it is stamped. (3) If a parcel has a weight class below 54 and has a delivery window above 42, then it is tracked. (4) If a parcel is delayed and is not undeliverable and is palletized, then it is not stamped. (5) If a parcel is oversized and has a parcel volume of at most 58, then it is delayed. (6) If a parcel has a parcel volume of at most 75, then it is oversized. (7) If a parcel is prepaid and is undeliverable, then it has no locker slot. (3) is void if the parcel has a delivery window of at most 71. (5) is void if the parcel has a postal zone below 51 and has a delivery window of at least 86. Question: Is it true that Nandor is stamped?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021619", "pair_id": "u021619-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021619-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "15815f79332f8b0a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021628-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel is fasting. Wendel is symptomatic. Gunnar is pregnant. Gunnar is referred. Aurel is not pregnant. Aurel is not fasting. Aurel is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is pregnant, then it is not sedated. (2) If a patient is sedated, then it is asthmatic. (3) If a patient is referred, then it has an interpreter. (4) If a patient is pregnant, then it has no interpreter. (5) If a patient is sedated, then it is not asthmatic. (6) If a patient has an interpreter, then it is sedated. (7) If a patient is fasting, then it is diabetic. (2) is void if the patient is not referred. (5) is void if the patient is symptomatic. (2) is void if the patient is not symptomatic. When (6) and (1) clash, (6) prevails. When (2) and (5) clash, (2) prevails. When (3) and (4) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Wendel is asthmatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021628", "pair_id": "u021628-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021628-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0ffdcdd2e5a6442a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u021628-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel is fasting. Wendel is symptomatic. Gunnar is pregnant. Gunnar is referred. Wendel is referred. Aurel is not pregnant. Aurel is not fasting. Aurel is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is pregnant, then it is not sedated. (2) If a patient is sedated, then it is asthmatic. (3) If a patient is referred, then it has an interpreter. (4) If a patient is pregnant, then it has no interpreter. (5) If a patient is sedated, then it is not asthmatic. (6) If a patient has an interpreter, then it is sedated. (7) If a patient is fasting, then it is diabetic. (2) is void if the patient is not referred. (5) is void if the patient is symptomatic. (2) is void if the patient is not symptomatic. When (6) and (1) clash, (6) prevails. When (2) and (5) clash, (2) prevails. When (3) and (4) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Wendel is asthmatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021628", "pair_id": "u021628-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021628-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7613b8d67c1e29c9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u021639-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is monitored. Kestrel has no firewall. Halcyon is provisioned. Tundra is not provisioned. Zephyr is not patched. Tundra has a firewall. Zephyr is provisioned. Kestrel is provisioned. Halcyon has a firewall.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is not patched, thus it is not virtualized. Provision 2: when the workload here is provisioned, thus it is throttled. Provision 3: when the workload here is not monitored, thus it is deprecated. Provision 4: when the workload here is monitored, thus it is not deprecated. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here is patched. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here has no firewall. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here is not patched. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here has a firewall. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Halcyon is deprecated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021639", "pair_id": "u021639-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021639-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bebcc7af75025133", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021639-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is monitored. Kestrel has no firewall. Halcyon is provisioned. Tundra is not provisioned. Zephyr is not patched. Tundra has a firewall. Zephyr is provisioned. Kestrel is provisioned. Halcyon has a firewall.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is not patched, thus it is not virtualized. Provision 2: when the workload here is provisioned, thus it is throttled. Provision 3: when the workload here is not monitored, thus it is deprecated. Provision 4: when the workload here is not monitored, thus it is not deprecated. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here is patched. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here has no firewall. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here is not patched. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here has a firewall. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Halcyon is deprecated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021639", "pair_id": "u021639-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021639-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "edcf07673e790dbb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021639-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is monitored. Kestrel has no firewall. Halcyon is provisioned. Tundra is not provisioned. Zephyr is not patched. Tundra has a firewall. Zephyr is provisioned. Kestrel is provisioned. Halcyon has a firewall.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is not patched, it thereby is not virtualized. Point B. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby is throttled. Point C. If said workload is not monitored, it thereby is deprecated. Point D. If said workload is monitored, it thereby is not deprecated. Point D is cancelled if said workload is patched. Point D is cancelled if said workload has no firewall. Point C is cancelled if said workload is not patched. Point A is cancelled if said workload has a firewall. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Halcyon is deprecated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021639", "pair_id": "u021639-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021639-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bebcc7af75025133", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021639-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is monitored. Kestrel has no firewall. Halcyon is provisioned. Tundra is not provisioned. Zephyr is not patched. Tundra has a firewall. Zephyr is provisioned. Kestrel is provisioned. Halcyon has a firewall.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is not patched, it thereby is not virtualized. Point B. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby is throttled. Point C. If said workload is not monitored, it thereby is deprecated. Point D. If said workload is not monitored, it thereby is not deprecated. Point D is cancelled if said workload is patched. Point D is cancelled if said workload has no firewall. Point C is cancelled if said workload is not patched. Point A is cancelled if said workload has a firewall. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Halcyon is deprecated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021639", "pair_id": "u021639-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021639-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "edcf07673e790dbb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021639-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is monitored. Kestrel has no firewall. Halcyon is provisioned. Tundra is not provisioned. Zephyr is not patched. Tundra has a firewall. Zephyr is provisioned. Kestrel is provisioned. Halcyon has a firewall.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is not patched, so it is not virtualized. No. 2 While the given workload is provisioned, so it is throttled. No. 3 While the given workload is not monitored, so it is deprecated. No. 4 While the given workload is monitored, so it is not deprecated. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload is patched. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload has no firewall. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload is not patched. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload has a firewall. No. 3 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Halcyon is deprecated\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021639", "pair_id": "u021639-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021639-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bebcc7af75025133", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021639-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is monitored. Kestrel has no firewall. Halcyon is provisioned. Tundra is not provisioned. Zephyr is not patched. Tundra has a firewall. Zephyr is provisioned. Kestrel is provisioned. Halcyon has a firewall.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is not patched, so it is not virtualized. No. 2 While the given workload is provisioned, so it is throttled. No. 3 While the given workload is not monitored, so it is deprecated. No. 4 While the given workload is not monitored, so it is not deprecated. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload is patched. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload has no firewall. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload is not patched. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload has a firewall. No. 3 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Halcyon is deprecated\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021639", "pair_id": "u021639-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021639-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "edcf07673e790dbb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021663-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is renewed. Electra is not peer reviewed. Gemma is not embargoed. Kochab is not budgeted. Gemma is budgeted. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is budgeted. Kochab is not embargoed. Kochab has ethics clearance. Gemma is not exploratory. Electra is not a pilot study. Electra is not interdisciplinary. Gemma has a steering committee. Gemma is cofunded. Gemma is a pilot study. Kochab is a pilot study. Electra is embargoed. Electra is not exploratory. Electra is shortlisted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is not interdisciplinary and likewise is not a pilot study, so it has industry backing. No. 2 While the given proposal is interdisciplinary, so it is not longitudinal. No. 3 While the given proposal is not embargoed, so it has a field site. No. 4 While the given proposal is not budgeted and likewise is not exploratory and likewise is shortlisted, so it is longitudinal. No. 5 While the given proposal is renewed and likewise has ethics clearance and likewise has a steering committee, so it is translational. No. 6 While the given proposal is not interdisciplinary and likewise is not a pilot study and likewise is embargoed, so it has no industry backing. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal is not cofunded and likewise is not exploratory. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal is interdisciplinary. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given proposal is a pilot study. No. 2 wins over No. 4. No. 1 wins over No. 6. Question: Is the claim \"Electra has industry backing\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021663", "pair_id": "u021663-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021663-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "85e3514eeb72cede", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u021663-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is renewed. Electra is not peer reviewed. Gemma is not embargoed. Kochab is not budgeted. Gemma is budgeted. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is budgeted. Kochab is not embargoed. Kochab has ethics clearance. Gemma is not exploratory. Electra is not a pilot study. Electra is not interdisciplinary. Gemma has a steering committee. Gemma is cofunded. Gemma is a pilot study. Kochab is a pilot study. Electra is embargoed. Electra is not exploratory. Electra is shortlisted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is not interdisciplinary and likewise is a pilot study, so it has industry backing. No. 2 While the given proposal is interdisciplinary, so it is not longitudinal. No. 3 While the given proposal is not embargoed, so it has a field site. No. 4 While the given proposal is not budgeted and likewise is not exploratory and likewise is shortlisted, so it is longitudinal. No. 5 While the given proposal is renewed and likewise has ethics clearance and likewise has a steering committee, so it is translational. No. 6 While the given proposal is not interdisciplinary and likewise is not a pilot study and likewise is embargoed, so it has no industry backing. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal is not cofunded and likewise is not exploratory. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal is interdisciplinary. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given proposal is a pilot study. No. 2 wins over No. 4. No. 1 wins over No. 6. Question: Is the claim \"Electra has industry backing\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021663", "pair_id": "u021663-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021663-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5f73488e4e5319a1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u021667-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin has no locker slot. Jory is not consolidated. Rasmus has a locker slot. Jory is delayed. Quentin is consolidated. Rasmus has a delivery window of 21.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not misrouted, it thereby is not registered. Point B. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby is registered. Point C. If said parcel is not consolidated, it thereby is fragile. Point D. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby is refrigerated. Point E. If said parcel is consolidated, it thereby is scanned. Point F. If said parcel is tracked, it thereby is hazardous. Point G. If said parcel has a delivery window of maximum 69, it thereby is perishable. Point H. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby is not misrouted. Question: Statement: Rasmus is registered. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021667", "pair_id": "u021667-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021667-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "f4e7d075b22dea82", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u021667-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin has no locker slot. Jory is not consolidated. Rasmus has a locker slot. Jory is delayed. Quentin is consolidated. Rasmus has a delivery window of 21.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not misrouted, it thereby is not registered. Point B. If said parcel has a locker slot, it thereby is tracked. Point C. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby is registered. Point D. If said parcel is not consolidated, it thereby is fragile. Point E. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby is refrigerated. Point F. If said parcel is consolidated, it thereby is scanned. Point G. If said parcel is tracked, it thereby is hazardous. Point H. If said parcel has a delivery window of maximum 69, it thereby is perishable. Point I. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby is not misrouted. Question: Statement: Rasmus is registered. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021667", "pair_id": "u021667-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021667-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "9b71766577d98fc0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u021767-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is uninsurable. Zdenek has a peril factor of 61. Yara is not appraised. Zdenek is uninsurable. Edda has a peril factor of 97.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a dashcam, then it is litigated. (2) If a policyholder has a deductible waiver, then it is reinstated. (3) If a policyholder has a peril factor of at least 54, then it has no roadside assistance. (4) If a policyholder has no roadside assistance, then it is lapsed. (5) If a policyholder has a deductible waiver, then it is a claimant. (6) If a policyholder is appraised, then it has no dashcam. (7) If a policyholder is lapsed, then it is not a claimant. (8) If a policyholder has no dashcam, then it has a deductible waiver. (9) If a policyholder is uninsurable, then it is retired. Question: Is it true that Zdenek is a claimant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021767", "pair_id": "u021767-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021767-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "83c831fa3d55bed2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u021767-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is uninsurable. Zdenek has a peril factor of 61. Yara is not appraised. Zdenek is uninsurable. Edda has a peril factor of 97.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a dashcam, then it is litigated. (2) If a policyholder has a deductible waiver, then it is reinstated. (3) If a policyholder has a peril factor below 54, then it has no roadside assistance. (4) If a policyholder has no roadside assistance, then it is lapsed. (5) If a policyholder has a deductible waiver, then it is a claimant. (6) If a policyholder is appraised, then it has no dashcam. (7) If a policyholder is lapsed, then it is not a claimant. (8) If a policyholder has no dashcam, then it has a deductible waiver. (9) If a policyholder is uninsurable, then it is retired. Question: Is it true that Zdenek is a claimant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021767", "pair_id": "u021767-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021767-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e08753820b2049a1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u021779-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz is not reproducible. Quartz is not versioned. Quartz is not obsolete. Quartz is profiled. Quartz has a changelog. Quartz has a patch cycle of 88.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a feature toggle and likewise has a patch cycle not below 87, so it is tagged. No. 2 While the given build has a feature toggle and likewise is fuzzed, so it is merged. No. 3 While the given build has a feature toggle and likewise is obsolete, so it is compiled. No. 4 While the given build has a feature toggle and likewise has a changelog, so it has a migration script. No. 5 While the given build has a feature toggle and likewise is reproducible, so it is localized. No. 6 While the given build is versioned and likewise has a test yield that exceeds 64, so it is reverted. No. 7 While the given build has a feature toggle and likewise has a patch cycle that falls below 87, so it is benchmarked. No. 8 While the given build is profiled, so it has a feature toggle. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given build has a changelog. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given build has a changelog. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build has a patch cycle not below 29. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build is obsolete. Question: Select what holds for Quartz: which option?", "options": ["is compiled", "is merged", "has a migration script", "is tagged", "is benchmarked", "is localized"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is tagged", "unit_id": "u021779", "pair_id": "u021779-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021779-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cf664ee82146fae6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a2", "a12", "a1", "a5", "a7"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u021779-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz is not reproducible. Quartz is not versioned. Quartz is not obsolete. Quartz is profiled. Quartz has a changelog. Quartz has a patch cycle of 59.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a feature toggle and likewise has a patch cycle not below 87, so it is tagged. No. 2 While the given build has a feature toggle and likewise is fuzzed, so it is merged. No. 3 While the given build has a feature toggle and likewise is obsolete, so it is compiled. No. 4 While the given build has a feature toggle and likewise has a changelog, so it has a migration script. No. 5 While the given build has a feature toggle and likewise is reproducible, so it is localized. No. 6 While the given build is versioned and likewise has a test yield that exceeds 64, so it is reverted. No. 7 While the given build has a feature toggle and likewise has a patch cycle that falls below 87, so it is benchmarked. No. 8 While the given build is profiled, so it has a feature toggle. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given build has a changelog. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given build has a changelog. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build has a patch cycle not below 29. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build is obsolete. Question: Select what holds for Quartz: which option?", "options": ["is compiled", "is merged", "has a migration script", "is tagged", "is benchmarked", "is localized"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is benchmarked", "unit_id": "u021779", "pair_id": "u021779-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021779-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9d2596d803bd2c4d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a2", "a12", "a1", "a5", "a7"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u021801-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin has no courier. Priya has a postal zone of 99. Odile is misrouted. Odile has a postal zone of 64. Quentin is not stamped. Odile is not stamped. Odile has a courier. Quentin has a postal zone of 8.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is palletized, thus it has a barcode. Provision 2: when the parcel here is not stamped while has a postal zone beneath 12 while has a courier, thus it is not palletized. Provision 3: when the parcel here is misrouted while has a courier, thus it is sealed. Provision 4: when the parcel here is palletized while has a postal zone beneath 63, thus it is refrigerated. Provision 5: when the parcel here is not stamped while has a postal zone at or above 12, thus it is palletized. Question: Would it be right to say that Odile is palletized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021801", "pair_id": "u021801-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021801-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "97de1a342bdbd835", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u021801-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin has no courier. Priya has a postal zone of 99. Odile is misrouted. Odile has a postal zone of 18. Quentin is not stamped. Odile is not stamped. Odile has a courier. Quentin has a postal zone of 8.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is palletized, thus it has a barcode. Provision 2: when the parcel here is not stamped while has a postal zone beneath 12 while has a courier, thus it is not palletized. Provision 3: when the parcel here is misrouted while has a courier, thus it is sealed. Provision 4: when the parcel here is palletized while has a postal zone beneath 63, thus it is refrigerated. Provision 5: when the parcel here is not stamped while has a postal zone at or above 12, thus it is palletized. Question: Would it be right to say that Odile is palletized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021801", "pair_id": "u021801-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021801-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e11cea150df88438", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u021819-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is localized. Mica is not tagged.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is not localized while is tagged, thus it has no feature toggle. Question: Would it be right to say that Schist is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021819", "pair_id": "u021819-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021819-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "1a4831dfe7f64334", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021819-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is localized. Schist is not localized. Mica is not tagged.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is not localized while is tagged, thus it has no feature toggle. Question: Would it be right to say that Schist is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021819", "pair_id": "u021819-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021819-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "2d7bfdaeeadde671", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021851-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is not reverted. Mica is merged. Mica has a lint backlog of 88.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is reproducible, then it is profiled. (2) If a build is not reverted, then it is reproducible. (3) If a build is profiled, then it is not experimental. (4) If a build is tagged, then it is obsolete. (5) If a build has a migration script, then it is not obsolete. (6) If a build is tested, then it is linted. (7) If a build is merged, then it is experimental. (8) If a build has a migration script, then it is not profiled. (9) If a build is versioned, then it has a migration script. (10) If a build has a lint backlog below 82, then it is not reproducible. (11) If a build is tagged, then it has no migration script. When (5) and (4) clash, (5) prevails. When (3) and (7) clash, (3) prevails. When (2) and (10) clash, (2) prevails. When (1) and (8) clash, (1) prevails. When (11) and (9) clash, (11) prevails. Question: Is it true that Mica is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021851", "pair_id": "u021851-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021851-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "10fb041901e030d4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u021851-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is not reverted. Mica is merged. Mica has a lint backlog of 88.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is reproducible, then it is profiled. (2) If a build is reverted, then it is reproducible. (3) If a build is profiled, then it is not experimental. (4) If a build is tagged, then it is obsolete. (5) If a build has a migration script, then it is not obsolete. (6) If a build is tested, then it is linted. (7) If a build is merged, then it is experimental. (8) If a build has a migration script, then it is not profiled. (9) If a build is versioned, then it has a migration script. (10) If a build has a lint backlog below 82, then it is not reproducible. (11) If a build is tagged, then it has no migration script. When (5) and (4) clash, (5) prevails. When (3) and (7) clash, (3) prevails. When (2) and (10) clash, (2) prevails. When (1) and (8) clash, (1) prevails. When (11) and (9) clash, (11) prevails. Question: Is it true that Mica is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021851", "pair_id": "u021851-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021851-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0c041b594105a9fb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u021862-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren has a credit rating of 16. Anouk has a credit rating of 0. Anouk is creditworthy. Evren is not creditworthy. Evren is not foreclosed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is a depositor, it also is amortized. Clause 2: once any borrower is a depositor and also has a risk tier of 85 or more and also is foreclosed, it also has a cosigner. Clause 3: once any borrower is a depositor, it also is garnished. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a credit rating over 86 and also is indebted. Question: Does it follow that Anouk is not creditworthy?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021862", "pair_id": "u021862-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021862-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1ea4dc3a9980a6d7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021862-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren has a credit rating of 16. Anouk is not foreclosed. Anouk has a credit rating of 0. Anouk is creditworthy. Evren is not creditworthy. Evren is not foreclosed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is a depositor, it also is amortized. Clause 2: once any borrower is a depositor and also has a risk tier of 85 or more and also is foreclosed, it also has a cosigner. Clause 3: once any borrower is a depositor, it also is garnished. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a credit rating over 86 and also is indebted. Question: Does it follow that Anouk is not creditworthy?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021862", "pair_id": "u021862-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021862-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ce194f971936210f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021903-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Halcyon is not idle. Kestrel is patched. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 57. Kestrel has a memory allotment of 63. Borealis is not patched. Kestrel has a replica count of 45. Borealis has a memory allotment of 67. Kestrel is not idle.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a failover node, it thereby is backed up. Point B. If said workload has a memory allotment of maximum 62, it thereby has a public endpoint. Point C. If said workload has a public endpoint, it thereby has a firewall. Point D. If said workload has a GPU, it thereby is stateless. Point E. If said workload is idle, it thereby is encrypted. Point F. If said workload is encrypted, it thereby has a failover node. Point G. If said workload is patched, it thereby is sharded. Point H. If said workload is patched, it thereby is not sandboxed. Point I. If said workload has a dedicated host, it thereby has a GPU. Point J. If said workload has a memory allotment in excess of 62, it thereby has a dedicated host. Point K. If said workload has a replica count in excess of 26, it thereby is provisioned. Point L. If said workload has a firewall, it thereby is deprecated. Point K is cancelled if said workload has a memory allotment of maximum 55. Question: Which choice is true for Kestrel?", "options": ["is stateless", "is deprecated", "is backed up"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is stateless", "unit_id": "u021903", "pair_id": "u021903-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021903-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ea4ff1b14bb8c766", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a15", "a9"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u021903-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Halcyon is not idle. Kestrel is patched. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 57. Kestrel has a memory allotment of 25. Borealis is not patched. Kestrel has a replica count of 45. Borealis has a memory allotment of 67. Kestrel is not idle.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a failover node, it thereby is backed up. Point B. If said workload has a memory allotment of maximum 62, it thereby has a public endpoint. Point C. If said workload has a public endpoint, it thereby has a firewall. Point D. If said workload has a GPU, it thereby is stateless. Point E. If said workload is idle, it thereby is encrypted. Point F. If said workload is encrypted, it thereby has a failover node. Point G. If said workload is patched, it thereby is sharded. Point H. If said workload is patched, it thereby is not sandboxed. Point I. If said workload has a dedicated host, it thereby has a GPU. Point J. If said workload has a memory allotment in excess of 62, it thereby has a dedicated host. Point K. If said workload has a replica count in excess of 26, it thereby is provisioned. Point L. If said workload has a firewall, it thereby is deprecated. Point K is cancelled if said workload has a memory allotment of maximum 55. Question: Which choice is true for Kestrel?", "options": ["is stateless", "is deprecated", "is backed up"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is deprecated", "unit_id": "u021903", "pair_id": "u021903-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021903-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1da410107f90a29c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a15", "a9"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u021919-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile is perishable. Odile has a parcel volume of 25. Odile has a delivery window of 80. Priya has a postal zone of 65. Odile has a postal zone of 73. Priya has a delivery window of 0. Priya is not prepaid. Priya is rerouted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel has a delivery window under 10, it also is registered. Clause 2: once any parcel has a parcel volume of 33 or less, it also is scanned. Clause 3: once any parcel is prepaid, it also is weighed. Clause 4: once any parcel is rerouted, it also is sealed. Clause 5: once any parcel has a postal zone of 81 or more, it also is hazardous. Clause 6: once any parcel is perishable, it also is not misrouted. Clause 7: once any parcel has a parcel volume over 33, it also has a barcode. Clause 1 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is rerouted. Clause 3 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is rerouted. Question: Which of these is true of Priya?", "options": ["is registered", "is scanned", "has a barcode", "is sealed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sealed", "unit_id": "u021919", "pair_id": "u021919-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021919-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d1e94d5abf5c6029", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a5", "a11", "a8"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u021919-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile is perishable. Odile has a parcel volume of 25. Odile has a delivery window of 80. Priya has a postal zone of 65. Odile has a postal zone of 73. Priya has a delivery window of 0. Priya is not prepaid. Priya is not rerouted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel has a delivery window under 10, it also is registered. Clause 2: once any parcel has a parcel volume of 33 or less, it also is scanned. Clause 3: once any parcel is prepaid, it also is weighed. Clause 4: once any parcel is rerouted, it also is sealed. Clause 5: once any parcel has a postal zone of 81 or more, it also is hazardous. Clause 6: once any parcel is perishable, it also is not misrouted. Clause 7: once any parcel has a parcel volume over 33, it also has a barcode. Clause 1 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is rerouted. Clause 3 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is rerouted. Question: Which of these is true of Priya?", "options": ["is registered", "is scanned", "has a barcode", "is sealed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is registered", "unit_id": "u021919", "pair_id": "u021919-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021919-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a9992cc824d77fa6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a5", "a11", "a8"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u021940-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is not recommended. Noor is not relocating. Noor is sponsored.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is relocating, so it is bilingual. No. 2 While the given candidate has a visa, so it is freelance. No. 3 While the given candidate has no visa, so it is not freelance. No. 4 While the given candidate is recommended, so it is not bilingual. No. 5 While the given candidate is recommended, so it is a graduate. No. 6 While the given candidate is interviewed, so it is not unionized. No. 7 While the given candidate is interviewed, so it has a visa. No. 8 While the given candidate is licensed, so it is unionized. No. 9 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it is interviewed. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is relocating. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a background screening. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a background screening. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a background screening. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a background screening. No. 6 wins over No. 8. No. 3 wins over No. 2. No. 1 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Noor is freelance\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021940", "pair_id": "u021940-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021940-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9372a4f5641a101d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u021940-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is not recommended. Noor is not relocating. Noor is sponsored.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is relocating, so it is bilingual. No. 2 While the given candidate has a visa, so it is freelance. No. 3 While the given candidate has a visa, so it is not freelance. No. 4 While the given candidate is recommended, so it is not bilingual. No. 5 While the given candidate is recommended, so it is a graduate. No. 6 While the given candidate is interviewed, so it is not unionized. No. 7 While the given candidate is interviewed, so it has a visa. No. 8 While the given candidate is licensed, so it is unionized. No. 9 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it is interviewed. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is relocating. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a background screening. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a background screening. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a background screening. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a background screening. No. 6 wins over No. 8. No. 3 wins over No. 2. No. 1 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Noor is freelance\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u021940", "pair_id": "u021940-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021940-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "368929fa7fead486", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u021951-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is anemic. Wendel is not anemic. Dorian is not bedridden. Dorian is not ambulatory. Cosima is rescheduled. Cosima has a chaperone. Dorian is not anemic. Wendel is rescheduled. Dorian is not rescheduled. Cosima is not postoperative. Cosima is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is not admitted provided that it is bedridden as well as is postoperative. Section 2: a patient is admitted provided that it is bedridden as well as has a chaperone as well as is anemic. Section 3: a patient is not vaccinated provided that it is rescheduled as well as is ambulatory. Section 2 lapses for a patient if it is ambulatory. Section 3 lapses for a patient if it has a chaperone. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Cosima is admitted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021951", "pair_id": "u021951-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021951-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6449bb806d6aa7bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021951-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is anemic. Wendel is not anemic. Dorian is not bedridden. Dorian is not ambulatory. Cosima is rescheduled. Cosima is bedridden. Cosima has a chaperone. Dorian is not anemic. Wendel is rescheduled. Dorian is not rescheduled. Cosima is not postoperative. Cosima is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is not admitted provided that it is bedridden as well as is postoperative. Section 2: a patient is admitted provided that it is bedridden as well as has a chaperone as well as is anemic. Section 3: a patient is not vaccinated provided that it is rescheduled as well as is ambulatory. Section 2 lapses for a patient if it is ambulatory. Section 3 lapses for a patient if it has a chaperone. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Cosima is admitted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021951", "pair_id": "u021951-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021951-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "34e81f86234712a0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021951-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is anemic. Wendel is not anemic. Dorian is not bedridden. Dorian is not ambulatory. Cosima is rescheduled. Cosima has a chaperone. Dorian is not anemic. Wendel is rescheduled. Dorian is not rescheduled. Cosima is not postoperative. Cosima is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is bedridden plus is postoperative: then it is not admitted. Policy II. Suppose that patient is bedridden plus has a chaperone plus is anemic: then it is admitted. Policy III. Suppose that patient is rescheduled plus is ambulatory: then it is not vaccinated. Policy II is waived if that patient is ambulatory. Policy III is waived if that patient has a chaperone. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Cosima is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021951", "pair_id": "u021951-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021951-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6449bb806d6aa7bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021951-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima is anemic. Wendel is not anemic. Dorian is not bedridden. Dorian is not ambulatory. Cosima is rescheduled. Cosima is bedridden. Cosima has a chaperone. Dorian is not anemic. Wendel is rescheduled. Dorian is not rescheduled. Cosima is not postoperative. Cosima is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is bedridden plus is postoperative: then it is not admitted. Policy II. Suppose that patient is bedridden plus has a chaperone plus is anemic: then it is admitted. Policy III. Suppose that patient is rescheduled plus is ambulatory: then it is not vaccinated. Policy II is waived if that patient is ambulatory. Policy III is waived if that patient has a chaperone. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Cosima is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021951", "pair_id": "u021951-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021951-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "34e81f86234712a0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021955-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Florin is not fasting. Xenia is ambulatory. Florin is ambulatory. Xenia is not fasting. Xenia has a chaperone. Gunnar has no chaperone.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is fasting: then it is hypertensive. Policy II. Suppose that patient is fasting: then it is not triaged. Policy III. Suppose that patient is fasting: then it is allergic. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is ambulatory: then it is triaged. Policy V. Suppose that patient is fasting: then it is not referred. Policy VI. Suppose that patient has a chaperone: then it is not hypertensive. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy VI. Question: Which choice is right for Xenia?", "options": ["is allergic", "is triaged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is triaged", "unit_id": "u021955", "pair_id": "u021955-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021955-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "48d5b85ae99e74b2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021955-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Florin is not fasting. Xenia is ambulatory. Florin is ambulatory. Xenia is not fasting. Xenia has no chaperone. Gunnar has no chaperone.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is fasting: then it is hypertensive. Policy II. Suppose that patient is fasting: then it is not triaged. Policy III. Suppose that patient is fasting: then it is allergic. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is ambulatory: then it is triaged. Policy V. Suppose that patient is fasting: then it is not referred. Policy VI. Suppose that patient has a chaperone: then it is not hypertensive. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy VI. Question: Which choice is right for Xenia?", "options": ["is allergic", "is triaged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is triaged", "unit_id": "u021955", "pair_id": "u021955-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021955-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "bb19c88ad04f5a7f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a0"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021958-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is seasoned. Petra is not probationary. Lotte is not probationary. Lotte is not certified. Petra is not seasoned. Lotte has an aptitude quotient of 35. Petra is not certified.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it is unionized. No. 2 While the given candidate is headhunted, so it is not unionized. No. 3 While the given candidate is probationary, so it is fingerprinted. No. 4 While the given candidate is not seasoned, so it is sponsored. No. 5 While the given candidate is certified, so it is not sponsored. No. 6 While the given candidate has an aptitude quotient that exceeds 85, so it is not headhunted. No. 7 While the given candidate is certified, so it is headhunted. No. 4 wins over No. 5. No. 6 wins over No. 7. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Lotte is unionized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u021958", "pair_id": "u021958-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021958-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b15e4339a259e7eb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021958-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is seasoned. Petra is not probationary. Lotte is not probationary. Lotte is not certified. Petra is not seasoned. Lotte has an aptitude quotient of 35. Petra is not certified.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it is unionized. No. 2 While the given candidate is headhunted, so it is not unionized. No. 3 While the given candidate is probationary, so it is fingerprinted. No. 4 While the given candidate is seasoned, so it is sponsored. No. 5 While the given candidate is certified, so it is not sponsored. No. 6 While the given candidate has an aptitude quotient that exceeds 85, so it is not headhunted. No. 7 While the given candidate is certified, so it is headhunted. No. 4 wins over No. 5. No. 6 wins over No. 7. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Lotte is unionized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u021958", "pair_id": "u021958-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021958-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ce1b17a85b209ed4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021966-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aurel has a pacemaker. Aurel is triaged. Aurel is pregnant. Vilja is triaged. Aurel is not sedated. Vilja is sedated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is fasting, it thereby is admitted. Point B. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby has a caregiver. Point C. If said patient is waitlisted, it thereby is contagious. Point D. If said patient has no pacemaker, it thereby has no interpreter. Point E. If said patient has a pacemaker, it thereby is allergic. Point F. If said patient is triaged, it thereby is asthmatic. Point G. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby is rescheduled. Point H. If said patient is not pregnant, it thereby is hypertensive. Point I. If said patient is not sedated, it thereby is fasting. Point J. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby is discharged. Point K. If said patient is sedated, it thereby is waitlisted. Point L. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby is anemic. Point M. If said patient is allergic, it thereby is referred. Point N. If said patient is hypertensive, it thereby has a chaperone. Point O. If said patient has no interpreter, it thereby is postoperative. Question: Which choice is true for Vilja?", "options": ["is admitted", "is referred", "is contagious", "is anemic", "has a chaperone", "is postoperative"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is contagious", "unit_id": "u021966", "pair_id": "u021966-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021966-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "6453d58889a2f192", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a16", "a10", "a5", "a18", "a12"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021966-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aurel has a pacemaker. Aurel is triaged. Aurel is pregnant. Vilja is triaged. Aurel is not sedated. Vilja is not sedated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is fasting, it thereby is admitted. Point B. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby has a caregiver. Point C. If said patient is waitlisted, it thereby is contagious. Point D. If said patient has no pacemaker, it thereby has no interpreter. Point E. If said patient has a pacemaker, it thereby is allergic. Point F. If said patient is triaged, it thereby is asthmatic. Point G. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby is rescheduled. Point H. If said patient is not pregnant, it thereby is hypertensive. Point I. If said patient is not sedated, it thereby is fasting. Point J. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby is discharged. Point K. If said patient is sedated, it thereby is waitlisted. Point L. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby is anemic. Point M. If said patient is allergic, it thereby is referred. Point N. If said patient is hypertensive, it thereby has a chaperone. Point O. If said patient has no interpreter, it thereby is postoperative. Question: Which choice is true for Vilja?", "options": ["is admitted", "is referred", "is contagious", "is anemic", "has a chaperone", "is postoperative"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is admitted", "unit_id": "u021966", "pair_id": "u021966-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021966-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "7911d43bdfb57d68", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a16", "a10", "a5", "a18", "a12"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021966-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aurel has a pacemaker. Aurel is triaged. Aurel is pregnant. Vilja is triaged. Aurel is not sedated. Vilja is sedated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is fasting, so it is admitted. No. 2 While the given patient is pregnant, so it has a caregiver. No. 3 While the given patient is waitlisted, so it is contagious. No. 4 While the given patient has no pacemaker, so it has no interpreter. No. 5 While the given patient has a pacemaker, so it is allergic. No. 6 While the given patient is triaged, so it is asthmatic. No. 7 While the given patient has a caregiver, so it is rescheduled. No. 8 While the given patient is not pregnant, so it is hypertensive. No. 9 While the given patient is not sedated, so it is fasting. No. 10 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is discharged. No. 11 While the given patient is sedated, so it is waitlisted. No. 12 While the given patient has a caregiver, so it is anemic. No. 13 While the given patient is allergic, so it is referred. No. 14 While the given patient is hypertensive, so it has a chaperone. No. 15 While the given patient has no interpreter, so it is postoperative. Question: Select what holds for Vilja: which option?", "options": ["is admitted", "is referred", "is contagious", "is anemic", "has a chaperone", "is postoperative"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is contagious", "unit_id": "u021966", "pair_id": "u021966-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021966-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "6453d58889a2f192", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a16", "a10", "a5", "a18", "a12"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021966-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aurel has a pacemaker. Aurel is triaged. Aurel is pregnant. Vilja is triaged. Aurel is not sedated. Vilja is not sedated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is fasting, so it is admitted. No. 2 While the given patient is pregnant, so it has a caregiver. No. 3 While the given patient is waitlisted, so it is contagious. No. 4 While the given patient has no pacemaker, so it has no interpreter. No. 5 While the given patient has a pacemaker, so it is allergic. No. 6 While the given patient is triaged, so it is asthmatic. No. 7 While the given patient has a caregiver, so it is rescheduled. No. 8 While the given patient is not pregnant, so it is hypertensive. No. 9 While the given patient is not sedated, so it is fasting. No. 10 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is discharged. No. 11 While the given patient is sedated, so it is waitlisted. No. 12 While the given patient has a caregiver, so it is anemic. No. 13 While the given patient is allergic, so it is referred. No. 14 While the given patient is hypertensive, so it has a chaperone. No. 15 While the given patient has no interpreter, so it is postoperative. Question: Select what holds for Vilja: which option?", "options": ["is admitted", "is referred", "is contagious", "is anemic", "has a chaperone", "is postoperative"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is admitted", "unit_id": "u021966", "pair_id": "u021966-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u021966-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "7911d43bdfb57d68", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a16", "a10", "a5", "a18", "a12"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u021976-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Deneb is multicenter. Nashira has a milestone total of 39. Hadar has no ethics clearance. Izar is multicenter. Deneb has a milestone total of 84. Deneb is budgeted. Nashira is longitudinal. Deneb is longitudinal. Deneb has no ethics clearance. Izar is budgeted. Nashira is not multicenter. Deneb has no steering committee. Izar is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has a milestone total beyond 57 while is multicenter while is longitudinal, thus it has industry backing. Provision 2: when the proposal here is budgeted while is multicenter while has a steering committee, thus it is resubmitted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is renewed, thus it is theoretical. Provision 4: when the proposal here is renewed, thus it is collaborative. Provision 5: when the proposal here has a milestone total beyond 57 while is longitudinal while is renewed, thus it is endorsed. Provision 5 has no effect when the proposal here is multicenter. Provision 3 has no effect when the proposal here has ethics clearance. Question: Which one describes Deneb?", "options": ["has industry backing", "is endorsed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has industry backing", "unit_id": "u021976", "pair_id": "u021976-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/13", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021976-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e1da43d6fc7834ad", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a0"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021976-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Deneb is multicenter. Nashira has a milestone total of 39. Hadar has no ethics clearance. Izar is multicenter. Deneb has a milestone total of 84. Deneb is budgeted. Nashira is longitudinal. Deneb is longitudinal. Deneb has no ethics clearance. Izar is budgeted. Nashira is not multicenter. Deneb has no steering committee. Izar is not longitudinal. Deneb is renewed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has a milestone total beyond 57 while is multicenter while is longitudinal, thus it has industry backing. Provision 2: when the proposal here is budgeted while is multicenter while has a steering committee, thus it is resubmitted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is renewed, thus it is theoretical. Provision 4: when the proposal here is renewed, thus it is collaborative. Provision 5: when the proposal here has a milestone total beyond 57 while is longitudinal while is renewed, thus it is endorsed. Provision 5 has no effect when the proposal here is multicenter. Provision 3 has no effect when the proposal here has ethics clearance. Question: Which one describes Deneb?", "options": ["has industry backing", "is endorsed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has industry backing", "unit_id": "u021976", "pair_id": "u021976-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/13", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021976-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a07bf9b8b586fc46", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a0"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021976-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Deneb is multicenter. Nashira has a milestone total of 39. Hadar has no ethics clearance. Izar is multicenter. Deneb has a milestone total of 84. Deneb is budgeted. Nashira is longitudinal. Deneb is longitudinal. Deneb has no ethics clearance. Izar is budgeted. Nashira is not multicenter. Deneb has no steering committee. Izar is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has a milestone total in excess of 57 and further is multicenter and further is longitudinal, it thereby has industry backing. Point B. If said proposal is budgeted and further is multicenter and further has a steering committee, it thereby is resubmitted. Point C. If said proposal is renewed, it thereby is theoretical. Point D. If said proposal is renewed, it thereby is collaborative. Point E. If said proposal has a milestone total in excess of 57 and further is longitudinal and further is renewed, it thereby is endorsed. Point E is cancelled if said proposal is multicenter. Point C is cancelled if said proposal has ethics clearance. Question: Which choice is true for Deneb?", "options": ["has industry backing", "is endorsed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has industry backing", "unit_id": "u021976", "pair_id": "u021976-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/13", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021976-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e1da43d6fc7834ad", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a0"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021976-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Deneb is multicenter. Nashira has a milestone total of 39. Hadar has no ethics clearance. Izar is multicenter. Deneb has a milestone total of 84. Deneb is budgeted. Nashira is longitudinal. Deneb is longitudinal. Deneb has no ethics clearance. Izar is budgeted. Nashira is not multicenter. Deneb has no steering committee. Izar is not longitudinal. Deneb is renewed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has a milestone total in excess of 57 and further is multicenter and further is longitudinal, it thereby has industry backing. Point B. If said proposal is budgeted and further is multicenter and further has a steering committee, it thereby is resubmitted. Point C. If said proposal is renewed, it thereby is theoretical. Point D. If said proposal is renewed, it thereby is collaborative. Point E. If said proposal has a milestone total in excess of 57 and further is longitudinal and further is renewed, it thereby is endorsed. Point E is cancelled if said proposal is multicenter. Point C is cancelled if said proposal has ethics clearance. Question: Which choice is true for Deneb?", "options": ["has industry backing", "is endorsed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has industry backing", "unit_id": "u021976", "pair_id": "u021976-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/13", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021976-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a07bf9b8b586fc46", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a0"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021976-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Deneb is multicenter. Nashira has a milestone total of 39. Hadar has no ethics clearance. Izar is multicenter. Deneb has a milestone total of 84. Deneb is budgeted. Nashira is longitudinal. Deneb is longitudinal. Deneb has no ethics clearance. Izar is budgeted. Nashira is not multicenter. Deneb has no steering committee. Izar is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a milestone total that exceeds 57 and likewise is multicenter and likewise is longitudinal, so it has industry backing. No. 2 While the given proposal is budgeted and likewise is multicenter and likewise has a steering committee, so it is resubmitted. No. 3 While the given proposal is renewed, so it is theoretical. No. 4 While the given proposal is renewed, so it is collaborative. No. 5 While the given proposal has a milestone total that exceeds 57 and likewise is longitudinal and likewise is renewed, so it is endorsed. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given proposal is multicenter. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given proposal has ethics clearance. Question: Select what holds for Deneb: which option?", "options": ["has industry backing", "is endorsed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has industry backing", "unit_id": "u021976", "pair_id": "u021976-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/13", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021976-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e1da43d6fc7834ad", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a0"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u021976-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Deneb is multicenter. Nashira has a milestone total of 39. Hadar has no ethics clearance. Izar is multicenter. Deneb has a milestone total of 84. Deneb is budgeted. Nashira is longitudinal. Deneb is longitudinal. Deneb has no ethics clearance. Izar is budgeted. Nashira is not multicenter. Deneb has no steering committee. Izar is not longitudinal. Deneb is renewed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a milestone total that exceeds 57 and likewise is multicenter and likewise is longitudinal, so it has industry backing. No. 2 While the given proposal is budgeted and likewise is multicenter and likewise has a steering committee, so it is resubmitted. No. 3 While the given proposal is renewed, so it is theoretical. No. 4 While the given proposal is renewed, so it is collaborative. No. 5 While the given proposal has a milestone total that exceeds 57 and likewise is longitudinal and likewise is renewed, so it is endorsed. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given proposal is multicenter. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given proposal has ethics clearance. Question: Select what holds for Deneb: which option?", "options": ["has industry backing", "is endorsed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has industry backing", "unit_id": "u021976", "pair_id": "u021976-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/13", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u021976-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a07bf9b8b586fc46", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a0"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u022004-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist is documented. Pumice is not documented. Schist is not minified. Pumice is minified.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is not documented, so it is tested. No. 2 While the given build is not flaky, so it is benchmarked. No. 3 While the given build is benchmarked, so it is tagged. No. 4 While the given build is tested, so it is compiled. No. 5 While the given build is minified, so it has a changelog. No. 6 While the given build is documented, so it is not flaky. No. 7 While the given build is compiled, so it is reverted. No. 8 While the given build is minified, so it is obsolete. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given build is documented. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given build is documented. No. 8 stops applying as long as the given build is documented. Question: Select what holds for Pumice: which option?", "options": ["is tagged", "is reverted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reverted", "unit_id": "u022004", "pair_id": "u022004-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022004-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5cd39a852e84b29c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a1", "a6"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022004-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist is documented. Pumice is not documented. Schist is not minified. Pumice is not minified.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is not documented, so it is tested. No. 2 While the given build is not flaky, so it is benchmarked. No. 3 While the given build is benchmarked, so it is tagged. No. 4 While the given build is tested, so it is compiled. No. 5 While the given build is minified, so it has a changelog. No. 6 While the given build is documented, so it is not flaky. No. 7 While the given build is compiled, so it is reverted. No. 8 While the given build is minified, so it is obsolete. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given build is documented. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given build is documented. No. 8 stops applying as long as the given build is documented. Question: Select what holds for Pumice: which option?", "options": ["is tagged", "is reverted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reverted", "unit_id": "u022004", "pair_id": "u022004-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022004-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "06c05a353403f96b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a1", "a6"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022012-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is not exploratory. Hadar is not preregistered. Deneb is exploratory.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is not preregistered, it also has a steering committee. Clause 2: once any proposal is renewed, it also is longitudinal. Clause 3: once any proposal is budgeted, it also is multicenter. Clause 4: once any proposal is not exploratory, it also is cofunded. Clause 5: once any proposal is translational, it also has a patent filing. Clause 6: once any proposal is exploratory, it also is renewed. Clause 7: once any proposal is cofunded, it also has a postdoc. Clause 8: once any proposal has a steering committee, it also is theoretical. Clause 9: once any proposal has no field site, it also is interdisciplinary. Clause 10: once any proposal is not peer reviewed, it also has no field site. Clause 11: once any proposal is peer reviewed, it also has no postdoc. Clause 12: once any proposal is collaborative, it also is not shortlisted. Clause 13: once any proposal is preregistered, it also is translational. Clause 14: once any proposal is peer reviewed, it also is budgeted. Clause 5 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not preregistered. Clause 7 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not peer reviewed. Clause 8 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is exploratory. Clause 11 overrides Clause 7. Question: Which of these is true of Deneb?", "options": ["is interdisciplinary", "is multicenter", "has a postdoc", "is theoretical", "is longitudinal", "has a patent filing"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is longitudinal", "unit_id": "u022012", "pair_id": "u022012-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022012-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4896b236e9f56fd7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a11", "a2", "a0", "a6", "a16"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022012-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is not exploratory. Hadar is not preregistered. Deneb is not exploratory.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is not preregistered, it also has a steering committee. Clause 2: once any proposal is renewed, it also is longitudinal. Clause 3: once any proposal is budgeted, it also is multicenter. Clause 4: once any proposal is not exploratory, it also is cofunded. Clause 5: once any proposal is translational, it also has a patent filing. Clause 6: once any proposal is exploratory, it also is renewed. Clause 7: once any proposal is cofunded, it also has a postdoc. Clause 8: once any proposal has a steering committee, it also is theoretical. Clause 9: once any proposal has no field site, it also is interdisciplinary. Clause 10: once any proposal is not peer reviewed, it also has no field site. Clause 11: once any proposal is peer reviewed, it also has no postdoc. Clause 12: once any proposal is collaborative, it also is not shortlisted. Clause 13: once any proposal is preregistered, it also is translational. Clause 14: once any proposal is peer reviewed, it also is budgeted. Clause 5 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not preregistered. Clause 7 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not peer reviewed. Clause 8 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is exploratory. Clause 11 overrides Clause 7. Question: Which of these is true of Deneb?", "options": ["is interdisciplinary", "is multicenter", "has a postdoc", "is theoretical", "is longitudinal", "has a patent filing"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a postdoc", "unit_id": "u022012", "pair_id": "u022012-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022012-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3a095a7923cdbda2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a11", "a2", "a0", "a6", "a16"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022012-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is not exploratory. Hadar is not preregistered. Deneb is exploratory.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is not preregistered, that proposal has a steering committee. Item B. When the proposal is renewed, that proposal is longitudinal. Item C. When the proposal is budgeted, that proposal is multicenter. Item D. When the proposal is not exploratory, that proposal is cofunded. Item E. When the proposal is translational, that proposal has a patent filing. Item F. When the proposal is exploratory, that proposal is renewed. Item G. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal has a postdoc. Item H. When the proposal has a steering committee, that proposal is theoretical. Item I. When the proposal has no field site, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item J. When the proposal is not peer reviewed, that proposal has no field site. Item K. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal has no postdoc. Item L. When the proposal is collaborative, that proposal is not shortlisted. Item M. When the proposal is preregistered, that proposal is translational. Item N. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal is budgeted. Item E is suspended when the proposal is not preregistered. Item G is suspended when the proposal is not peer reviewed. Item H is suspended when the proposal is exploratory. Item K outranks Item G. Question: What applies to Deneb?", "options": ["is interdisciplinary", "is multicenter", "has a postdoc", "is theoretical", "is longitudinal", "has a patent filing"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is longitudinal", "unit_id": "u022012", "pair_id": "u022012-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022012-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4896b236e9f56fd7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a11", "a2", "a0", "a6", "a16"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022012-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is not exploratory. Hadar is not preregistered. Deneb is not exploratory.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is not preregistered, that proposal has a steering committee. Item B. When the proposal is renewed, that proposal is longitudinal. Item C. When the proposal is budgeted, that proposal is multicenter. Item D. When the proposal is not exploratory, that proposal is cofunded. Item E. When the proposal is translational, that proposal has a patent filing. Item F. When the proposal is exploratory, that proposal is renewed. Item G. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal has a postdoc. Item H. When the proposal has a steering committee, that proposal is theoretical. Item I. When the proposal has no field site, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item J. When the proposal is not peer reviewed, that proposal has no field site. Item K. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal has no postdoc. Item L. When the proposal is collaborative, that proposal is not shortlisted. Item M. When the proposal is preregistered, that proposal is translational. Item N. When the proposal is peer reviewed, that proposal is budgeted. Item E is suspended when the proposal is not preregistered. Item G is suspended when the proposal is not peer reviewed. Item H is suspended when the proposal is exploratory. Item K outranks Item G. Question: What applies to Deneb?", "options": ["is interdisciplinary", "is multicenter", "has a postdoc", "is theoretical", "is longitudinal", "has a patent filing"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a postdoc", "unit_id": "u022012", "pair_id": "u022012-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022012-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3a095a7923cdbda2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a11", "a2", "a0", "a6", "a16"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022031-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek has flood coverage. Agata is grandfathered. Zdenek is retired. Zdenek has a premium discount. Zdenek is a smoker. Xaver has no flood coverage. Zdenek is not grandfathered. Agata is bundled. Agata has no premium discount.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is subrogated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is litigated, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it is not reinstated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it has roadside assistance. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it is indemnified. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is a smoker, thus it has no beneficiary. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it has no dashcam. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it is reinstated. Provision 10: when the policyholder here is a smoker, thus it is litigated. Provision 11: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it has no rider. Provision 12: when the policyholder here has a premium discount, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here is grandfathered. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here is a claimant. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Which one describes Zdenek?", "options": ["has roadside assistance", "is indemnified", "has a beneficiary", "has a dashcam"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a dashcam", "unit_id": "u022031", "pair_id": "u022031-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022031-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b51b0ab0dd5d4227", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a5", "a6", "a1"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022031-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek has flood coverage. Agata is grandfathered. Zdenek is retired. Zdenek has a premium discount. Zdenek is not a smoker. Xaver has no flood coverage. Zdenek is not grandfathered. Agata is bundled. Agata has no premium discount.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is subrogated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is litigated, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it is not reinstated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it has roadside assistance. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it is indemnified. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is a smoker, thus it has no beneficiary. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it has no dashcam. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it is reinstated. Provision 10: when the policyholder here is a smoker, thus it is litigated. Provision 11: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it has no rider. Provision 12: when the policyholder here has a premium discount, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here is grandfathered. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here is a claimant. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Which one describes Zdenek?", "options": ["has roadside assistance", "is indemnified", "has a beneficiary", "has a dashcam"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a beneficiary", "unit_id": "u022031", "pair_id": "u022031-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022031-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ef1510ef2470fbcd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a5", "a6", "a1"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022031-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek has flood coverage. Agata is grandfathered. Zdenek is retired. Zdenek has a premium discount. Zdenek is a smoker. Xaver has no flood coverage. Zdenek is not grandfathered. Agata is bundled. Agata has no premium discount.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is a claimant, it thereby is subrogated. Point B. If said policyholder is litigated, it thereby has a dashcam. Point C. If said policyholder is uninsurable, it thereby is not reinstated. Point D. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby has roadside assistance. Point E. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point F. If said policyholder is subrogated, it thereby is indemnified. Point G. If said policyholder is a smoker, it thereby has no beneficiary. Point H. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby has no dashcam. Point I. If said policyholder is bundled, it thereby is reinstated. Point J. If said policyholder is a smoker, it thereby is litigated. Point K. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby has no rider. Point L. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby is reimbursed. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder is grandfathered. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder is a claimant. Point I supersedes Point C. Point G supersedes Point E. Point H supersedes Point B. Question: Which choice is true for Zdenek?", "options": ["has roadside assistance", "is indemnified", "has a beneficiary", "has a dashcam"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a dashcam", "unit_id": "u022031", "pair_id": "u022031-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022031-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b51b0ab0dd5d4227", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a5", "a6", "a1"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022031-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek has flood coverage. Agata is grandfathered. Zdenek is retired. Zdenek has a premium discount. Zdenek is not a smoker. Xaver has no flood coverage. Zdenek is not grandfathered. Agata is bundled. Agata has no premium discount.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is a claimant, it thereby is subrogated. Point B. If said policyholder is litigated, it thereby has a dashcam. Point C. If said policyholder is uninsurable, it thereby is not reinstated. Point D. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby has roadside assistance. Point E. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point F. If said policyholder is subrogated, it thereby is indemnified. Point G. If said policyholder is a smoker, it thereby has no beneficiary. Point H. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby has no dashcam. Point I. If said policyholder is bundled, it thereby is reinstated. Point J. If said policyholder is a smoker, it thereby is litigated. Point K. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby has no rider. Point L. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby is reimbursed. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder is grandfathered. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder is a claimant. Point I supersedes Point C. Point G supersedes Point E. Point H supersedes Point B. Question: Which choice is true for Zdenek?", "options": ["has roadside assistance", "is indemnified", "has a beneficiary", "has a dashcam"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a beneficiary", "unit_id": "u022031", "pair_id": "u022031-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022031-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ef1510ef2470fbcd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a5", "a6", "a1"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022080-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel has a pulse rate of 40. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 64. Zora has a pulse rate of 40. Wendel is hypertensive. Wendel is not asthmatic. Gunnar is not discharged. Gunnar is not sedated. Wendel is sedated. Zora is not sedated. Wendel has a mobility rank of 32. Wendel has a pulse rate of 15. Wendel is allergic. Zora is asthmatic. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 24.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is diabetic and has a pulse rate above 14, then it is not symptomatic. (2) If a patient has a mobility rank below 36, then it is diabetic. (3) If a patient is diabetic and has a pulse rate below 36 and has a pacemaker, then it is admitted. (4) If a patient is sedated and is hypertensive and is allergic, then it has a pacemaker. (5) If a patient is discharged, then it is bedridden. (6) If a patient is diabetic and has a pulse rate of at least 36, then it is not admitted. (5) is void if the patient is asthmatic. (3) is void if the patient is asthmatic and is hypertensive. (1) is void if the patient has a pulse rate of at most 16. Question: Is it true that Wendel is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022080", "pair_id": "u022080-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022080-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9058ef23c9747030", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022080-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel has a pulse rate of 40. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 64. Zora has a pulse rate of 40. Wendel is hypertensive. Wendel is not asthmatic. Gunnar is not discharged. Gunnar is not sedated. Wendel is sedated. Zora is not sedated. Wendel has a mobility rank of 32. Wendel has a pulse rate of 68. Wendel is allergic. Zora is asthmatic. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 24.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is diabetic and has a pulse rate above 14, then it is not symptomatic. (2) If a patient has a mobility rank below 36, then it is diabetic. (3) If a patient is diabetic and has a pulse rate below 36 and has a pacemaker, then it is admitted. (4) If a patient is sedated and is hypertensive and is allergic, then it has a pacemaker. (5) If a patient is discharged, then it is bedridden. (6) If a patient is diabetic and has a pulse rate of at least 36, then it is not admitted. (5) is void if the patient is asthmatic. (3) is void if the patient is asthmatic and is hypertensive. (1) is void if the patient has a pulse rate of at most 16. Question: Is it true that Wendel is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022080", "pair_id": "u022080-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022080-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "09b44ce6e9f42d7f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022080-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel has a pulse rate of 40. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 64. Zora has a pulse rate of 40. Wendel is hypertensive. Wendel is not asthmatic. Gunnar is not discharged. Gunnar is not sedated. Wendel is sedated. Zora is not sedated. Wendel has a mobility rank of 32. Wendel has a pulse rate of 15. Wendel is allergic. Zora is asthmatic. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 24.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is diabetic, and has a pulse rate of more than 14, that patient is not symptomatic. Item B. When the patient has a mobility rank of less than 36, that patient is diabetic. Item C. When the patient is diabetic, and has a pulse rate of less than 36, and has a pacemaker, that patient is admitted. Item D. When the patient is sedated, and is hypertensive, and is allergic, that patient has a pacemaker. Item E. When the patient is discharged, that patient is bedridden. Item F. When the patient is diabetic, and has a pulse rate of no less than 36, that patient is not admitted. Item E is suspended when the patient is asthmatic. Item C is suspended when the patient is asthmatic, and is hypertensive. Item A is suspended when the patient has a pulse rate of no more than 16. Question: Can one infer that Wendel is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022080", "pair_id": "u022080-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022080-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9058ef23c9747030", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022080-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel has a pulse rate of 40. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 64. Zora has a pulse rate of 40. Wendel is hypertensive. Wendel is not asthmatic. Gunnar is not discharged. Gunnar is not sedated. Wendel is sedated. Zora is not sedated. Wendel has a mobility rank of 32. Wendel has a pulse rate of 68. Wendel is allergic. Zora is asthmatic. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 24.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is diabetic, and has a pulse rate of more than 14, that patient is not symptomatic. Item B. When the patient has a mobility rank of less than 36, that patient is diabetic. Item C. When the patient is diabetic, and has a pulse rate of less than 36, and has a pacemaker, that patient is admitted. Item D. When the patient is sedated, and is hypertensive, and is allergic, that patient has a pacemaker. Item E. When the patient is discharged, that patient is bedridden. Item F. When the patient is diabetic, and has a pulse rate of no less than 36, that patient is not admitted. Item E is suspended when the patient is asthmatic. Item C is suspended when the patient is asthmatic, and is hypertensive. Item A is suspended when the patient has a pulse rate of no more than 16. Question: Can one infer that Wendel is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022080", "pair_id": "u022080-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022080-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "09b44ce6e9f42d7f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022085-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus has a waybill. Liesel is not hazardous. Rasmus is hazardous. Rasmus is refrigerated. Liesel has a waybill. Liesel is not refrigerated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is palletized provided that it is not hazardous. Section 2: a parcel is prepaid provided that it has a waybill. Section 3: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is delayed. Section 4: a parcel has a courier provided that it is refrigerated. Section 5: a parcel is not scanned provided that it is palletized. Section 6: a parcel is not perishable provided that it has a locker slot. Section 7: a parcel is registered provided that it is undeliverable. Section 8: a parcel is perishable provided that it is registered. Section 9: a parcel is scanned provided that it is rerouted. Section 10: a parcel is delayed provided that it is palletized. Section 11: a parcel is undeliverable provided that it has a locker slot. Section 12: a parcel is rerouted provided that it is prepaid. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 9. Question: Which statement fits Liesel?", "options": ["has a barcode", "is perishable", "is scanned"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a barcode", "unit_id": "u022085", "pair_id": "u022085-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022085-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "66e6771dc9ba20f2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a5", "a3"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022085-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus has a waybill. Liesel is not hazardous. Rasmus is hazardous. Rasmus is refrigerated. Liesel has a waybill. Liesel is not refrigerated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is palletized provided that it is hazardous. Section 2: a parcel is prepaid provided that it has a waybill. Section 3: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is delayed. Section 4: a parcel has a courier provided that it is refrigerated. Section 5: a parcel is not scanned provided that it is palletized. Section 6: a parcel is not perishable provided that it has a locker slot. Section 7: a parcel is registered provided that it is undeliverable. Section 8: a parcel is perishable provided that it is registered. Section 9: a parcel is scanned provided that it is rerouted. Section 10: a parcel is delayed provided that it is palletized. Section 11: a parcel is undeliverable provided that it has a locker slot. Section 12: a parcel is rerouted provided that it is prepaid. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 9. Question: Which statement fits Liesel?", "options": ["has a barcode", "is perishable", "is scanned"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is scanned", "unit_id": "u022085", "pair_id": "u022085-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022085-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "a231f3a61030a139", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a5", "a3"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022085-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus has a waybill. Liesel is not hazardous. Rasmus is hazardous. Rasmus is refrigerated. Liesel has a waybill. Liesel is not refrigerated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not hazardous: then it is palletized. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a waybill: then it is prepaid. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it has a barcode. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated: then it has a courier. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is palletized: then it is not scanned. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel has a locker slot: then it is not perishable. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is undeliverable: then it is registered. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is registered: then it is perishable. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is rerouted: then it is scanned. Policy X. Suppose that parcel is palletized: then it is delayed. Policy XI. Suppose that parcel has a locker slot: then it is undeliverable. Policy XII. Suppose that parcel is prepaid: then it is rerouted. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy IX. Question: Which choice is right for Liesel?", "options": ["has a barcode", "is perishable", "is scanned"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a barcode", "unit_id": "u022085", "pair_id": "u022085-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022085-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "66e6771dc9ba20f2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a5", "a3"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022085-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus has a waybill. Liesel is not hazardous. Rasmus is hazardous. Rasmus is refrigerated. Liesel has a waybill. Liesel is not refrigerated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is hazardous: then it is palletized. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a waybill: then it is prepaid. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it has a barcode. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated: then it has a courier. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is palletized: then it is not scanned. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel has a locker slot: then it is not perishable. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is undeliverable: then it is registered. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is registered: then it is perishable. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is rerouted: then it is scanned. Policy X. Suppose that parcel is palletized: then it is delayed. Policy XI. Suppose that parcel has a locker slot: then it is undeliverable. Policy XII. Suppose that parcel is prepaid: then it is rerouted. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy IX. Question: Which choice is right for Liesel?", "options": ["has a barcode", "is perishable", "is scanned"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is scanned", "unit_id": "u022085", "pair_id": "u022085-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022085-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "a231f3a61030a139", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a5", "a3"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022123-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Capella has no steering committee. Aldebaran is interdisciplinary. Aldebaran is not collaborative. Capella is translational. Capella is interdisciplinary. Aldebaran has a steering committee. Aldebaran has no industry backing. Capella is not a pilot study. Capella is not resubmitted. Aldebaran is a pilot study. Capella is not collaborative. Aldebaran is peer reviewed. Capella is endorsed. Capella has a postdoc. Aldebaran is not budgeted. Aldebaran is endorsed. Capella is not peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is embargoed, and is not endorsed, and is not resubmitted, that proposal is preregistered. Item B. When the proposal is embargoed, and is budgeted, and has no patent filing, that proposal is theoretical. Item C. When the proposal is collaborative, and has no industry backing, that proposal is not embargoed. Item D. When the proposal is embargoed, and is not interdisciplinary, and is not resubmitted, that proposal has ethics clearance. Item E. When the proposal is not peer reviewed, that proposal is not shortlisted. Item F. When the proposal has a postdoc, and has no industry backing, that proposal has seed funding. Item G. When the proposal is not collaborative, and is translational, that proposal is embargoed. Item H. When the proposal has industry backing, that proposal is not multicenter. Item I. When the proposal is embargoed, and is endorsed, that proposal is exploratory. Item J. When the proposal is renewed, that proposal is multicenter. Item K. When the proposal is embargoed, and is not peer reviewed, and is a pilot study, that proposal is longitudinal. Item L. When the proposal is embargoed, and has a steering committee, that proposal is shortlisted. Item B is suspended when the proposal is not interdisciplinary. Item J is suspended when the proposal has no steering committee. Item C outranks Item G. Item E outranks Item L. Item J outranks Item H. Question: What applies to Capella?", "options": ["is longitudinal", "is shortlisted", "has ethics clearance", "is preregistered", "is exploratory", "is theoretical"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is exploratory", "unit_id": "u022123", "pair_id": "u022123-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022123-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b5ca514c8101e08b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a14", "a17", "a10", "a9", "a11", "a3"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022123-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Capella has no steering committee. Aldebaran is interdisciplinary. Aldebaran is not collaborative. Capella is translational. Capella is interdisciplinary. Aldebaran has a steering committee. Aldebaran has no industry backing. Capella is not a pilot study. Capella is not resubmitted. Aldebaran is a pilot study. Capella is not collaborative. Aldebaran is peer reviewed. Capella is not endorsed. Capella has a postdoc. Aldebaran is not budgeted. Aldebaran is endorsed. Capella is not peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is embargoed, and is not endorsed, and is not resubmitted, that proposal is preregistered. Item B. When the proposal is embargoed, and is budgeted, and has no patent filing, that proposal is theoretical. Item C. When the proposal is collaborative, and has no industry backing, that proposal is not embargoed. Item D. When the proposal is embargoed, and is not interdisciplinary, and is not resubmitted, that proposal has ethics clearance. Item E. When the proposal is not peer reviewed, that proposal is not shortlisted. Item F. When the proposal has a postdoc, and has no industry backing, that proposal has seed funding. Item G. When the proposal is not collaborative, and is translational, that proposal is embargoed. Item H. When the proposal has industry backing, that proposal is not multicenter. Item I. When the proposal is embargoed, and is endorsed, that proposal is exploratory. Item J. When the proposal is renewed, that proposal is multicenter. Item K. When the proposal is embargoed, and is not peer reviewed, and is a pilot study, that proposal is longitudinal. Item L. When the proposal is embargoed, and has a steering committee, that proposal is shortlisted. Item B is suspended when the proposal is not interdisciplinary. Item J is suspended when the proposal has no steering committee. Item C outranks Item G. Item E outranks Item L. Item J outranks Item H. Question: What applies to Capella?", "options": ["is longitudinal", "is shortlisted", "has ethics clearance", "is preregistered", "is exploratory", "is theoretical"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is preregistered", "unit_id": "u022123", "pair_id": "u022123-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022123-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "553b964323a7c6cb", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a14", "a17", "a10", "a9", "a11", "a3"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022127-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri is not litigated. Xaver has no flood coverage. Dmitri has a premium band of 17. Xaver is indemnified. Fabian has a premium band of 86. Dmitri has no flood coverage. Xaver is disputed. Xaver is not litigated. Dmitri is not indemnified. Fabian has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby is lapsed. Point B. If said policyholder is litigated, it thereby is reinstated. Point C. If said policyholder has a premium band of minimum 65, it thereby is not reinstated. Point D. If said policyholder has a deductible waiver, it thereby has no rider. Point E. If said policyholder has a premium band short of 27, it thereby is not lapsed. Point F. If said policyholder has a deductible waiver, it thereby has a rider. Point G. If said policyholder is indemnified, it thereby has no deductible waiver. Point H. If said policyholder is not lapsed, it thereby has a deductible waiver. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is not disputed. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder has flood coverage. Point F is cancelled if said policyholder is disputed. Point H supersedes Point G. Point D supersedes Point F. Point B supersedes Point C. Point E supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Dmitri has a rider. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022127", "pair_id": "u022127-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022127-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a27cca8ed37e0391", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022127-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri is not litigated. Xaver has no flood coverage. Dmitri has a premium band of 17. Xaver is indemnified. Fabian has a premium band of 86. Dmitri has no flood coverage. Xaver is disputed. Xaver is not litigated. Dmitri is not indemnified. Fabian has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby is lapsed. Point B. If said policyholder is litigated, it thereby is reinstated. Point C. If said policyholder has a premium band short of 65, it thereby is not reinstated. Point D. If said policyholder has a deductible waiver, it thereby has no rider. Point E. If said policyholder has a premium band short of 27, it thereby is not lapsed. Point F. If said policyholder has a deductible waiver, it thereby has a rider. Point G. If said policyholder is indemnified, it thereby has no deductible waiver. Point H. If said policyholder is not lapsed, it thereby has a deductible waiver. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is not disputed. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder has flood coverage. Point F is cancelled if said policyholder is disputed. Point H supersedes Point G. Point D supersedes Point F. Point B supersedes Point C. Point E supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Dmitri has a rider. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022127", "pair_id": "u022127-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022127-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4d01a4694133fc35", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022127-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri is not litigated. Xaver has no flood coverage. Dmitri has a premium band of 17. Xaver is indemnified. Fabian has a premium band of 86. Dmitri has no flood coverage. Xaver is disputed. Xaver is not litigated. Dmitri is not indemnified. Fabian has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has flood coverage, so it is lapsed. No. 2 While the given policyholder is litigated, so it is reinstated. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a premium band not below 65, so it is not reinstated. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it has no rider. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a premium band that falls below 27, so it is not lapsed. No. 6 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it has a rider. No. 7 While the given policyholder is indemnified, so it has no deductible waiver. No. 8 While the given policyholder is not lapsed, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not disputed. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has flood coverage. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is disputed. No. 8 wins over No. 7. No. 4 wins over No. 6. No. 2 wins over No. 3. No. 5 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Dmitri has a rider\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022127", "pair_id": "u022127-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022127-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a27cca8ed37e0391", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022127-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri is not litigated. Xaver has no flood coverage. Dmitri has a premium band of 17. Xaver is indemnified. Fabian has a premium band of 86. Dmitri has no flood coverage. Xaver is disputed. Xaver is not litigated. Dmitri is not indemnified. Fabian has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has flood coverage, so it is lapsed. No. 2 While the given policyholder is litigated, so it is reinstated. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a premium band that falls below 65, so it is not reinstated. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it has no rider. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a premium band that falls below 27, so it is not lapsed. No. 6 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it has a rider. No. 7 While the given policyholder is indemnified, so it has no deductible waiver. No. 8 While the given policyholder is not lapsed, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not disputed. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has flood coverage. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is disputed. No. 8 wins over No. 7. No. 4 wins over No. 6. No. 2 wins over No. 3. No. 5 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Dmitri has a rider\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022127", "pair_id": "u022127-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022127-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4d01a4694133fc35", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022184-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fabian is appraised. Fabian is not inspected. Xaver has no dashcam. Xaver is inspected.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it is lapsed. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is not reimbursed. No. 3 While the given policyholder is reimbursed, so it is disputed. No. 4 While the given policyholder is inspected, so it is litigated. No. 5 While the given policyholder is not reimbursed, so it is grandfathered. No. 6 While the given policyholder has no dashcam, so it has roadside assistance. No. 7 While the given policyholder is lapsed, so it is reinstated. No. 8 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is indemnified. No. 9 While the given policyholder is grandfathered, so it has a beneficiary. No. 10 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it is a claimant. No. 11 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it has a premium discount. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is a smoker. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a dashcam. Question: Select what holds for Fabian: which option?", "options": ["has a premium discount", "is grandfathered", "is indemnified", "is reinstated"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is reinstated", "unit_id": "u022184", "pair_id": "u022184-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022184-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ea792eab4d3bd972", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a0", "a3", "a11"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u022184-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fabian is appraised. Fabian is not inspected. Xaver has no dashcam. Fabian is a smoker. Xaver is inspected.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it is lapsed. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is not reimbursed. No. 3 While the given policyholder is reimbursed, so it is disputed. No. 4 While the given policyholder is inspected, so it is litigated. No. 5 While the given policyholder is not reimbursed, so it is grandfathered. No. 6 While the given policyholder has no dashcam, so it has roadside assistance. No. 7 While the given policyholder is lapsed, so it is reinstated. No. 8 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is indemnified. No. 9 While the given policyholder is grandfathered, so it has a beneficiary. No. 10 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it is a claimant. No. 11 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it has a premium discount. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is a smoker. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a dashcam. Question: Select what holds for Fabian: which option?", "options": ["has a premium discount", "is grandfathered", "is indemnified", "is reinstated"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is indemnified", "unit_id": "u022184", "pair_id": "u022184-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022184-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cad6c8855fe96733", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a0", "a3", "a11"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u022188-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not referred. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 22. Gunnar is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is sedated and has a mobility rank above 19 and is referred, then it is not anemic. (2) If a patient is sedated and has a mobility rank of at most 19, then it is anemic. (3) If a patient is bedridden, then it is allergic. (4) If a patient is referred and is ambulatory, then it is pregnant. (5) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is not allergic. (6) If a patient has a mobility rank below 21, then it is sedated. (4) is void if the patient is hypertensive. (2) is void if the patient has a pain level below 57 and is referred. (6) is void if the patient is referred and is hypertensive. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Gunnar is anemic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022188", "pair_id": "u022188-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022188-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5eb9342d27ec1f21", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022188-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not referred. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 22. Gunnar is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is sedated and has a mobility rank above 19 and is referred, then it is not anemic. (2) If a patient is sedated and has a mobility rank of at most 19, then it is anemic. (3) If a patient is bedridden, then it is allergic. (4) If a patient is referred and is ambulatory, then it is pregnant. (5) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is not allergic. (6) If a patient has a mobility rank below 68, then it is sedated. (4) is void if the patient is hypertensive. (2) is void if the patient has a pain level below 57 and is referred. (6) is void if the patient is referred and is hypertensive. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Gunnar is anemic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022188", "pair_id": "u022188-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022188-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "247de7d80f8496c2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022188-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not referred. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 22. Gunnar is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is sedated and also has a mobility rank over 19 and also is referred, it also is not anemic. Clause 2: once any patient is sedated and also has a mobility rank of 19 or less, it also is anemic. Clause 3: once any patient is bedridden, it also is allergic. Clause 4: once any patient is referred and also is ambulatory, it also is pregnant. Clause 5: once any patient is hypertensive, it also is not allergic. Clause 6: once any patient has a mobility rank under 21, it also is sedated. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient is hypertensive. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a pain level under 57 and also is referred. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is referred and also is hypertensive. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Clause 2 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Gunnar is anemic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022188", "pair_id": "u022188-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022188-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5eb9342d27ec1f21", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022188-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not referred. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 22. Gunnar is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is sedated and also has a mobility rank over 19 and also is referred, it also is not anemic. Clause 2: once any patient is sedated and also has a mobility rank of 19 or less, it also is anemic. Clause 3: once any patient is bedridden, it also is allergic. Clause 4: once any patient is referred and also is ambulatory, it also is pregnant. Clause 5: once any patient is hypertensive, it also is not allergic. Clause 6: once any patient has a mobility rank under 68, it also is sedated. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient is hypertensive. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a pain level under 57 and also is referred. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is referred and also is hypertensive. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Clause 2 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Gunnar is anemic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022188", "pair_id": "u022188-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022188-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "247de7d80f8496c2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022188-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not referred. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 22. Gunnar is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is sedated, and has a mobility rank of more than 19, and is referred, that patient is not anemic. Item B. When the patient is sedated, and has a mobility rank of no more than 19, that patient is anemic. Item C. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is allergic. Item D. When the patient is referred, and is ambulatory, that patient is pregnant. Item E. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient is not allergic. Item F. When the patient has a mobility rank of less than 21, that patient is sedated. Item D is suspended when the patient is hypertensive. Item B is suspended when the patient has a pain level of less than 57, and is referred. Item F is suspended when the patient is referred, and is hypertensive. Item E outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Gunnar is anemic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022188", "pair_id": "u022188-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022188-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5eb9342d27ec1f21", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022188-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not referred. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 22. Gunnar is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is sedated, and has a mobility rank of more than 19, and is referred, that patient is not anemic. Item B. When the patient is sedated, and has a mobility rank of no more than 19, that patient is anemic. Item C. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is allergic. Item D. When the patient is referred, and is ambulatory, that patient is pregnant. Item E. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient is not allergic. Item F. When the patient has a mobility rank of less than 68, that patient is sedated. Item D is suspended when the patient is hypertensive. Item B is suspended when the patient has a pain level of less than 57, and is referred. Item F is suspended when the patient is referred, and is hypertensive. Item E outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Gunnar is anemic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022188", "pair_id": "u022188-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022188-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "247de7d80f8496c2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022211-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not signed. Obsidian is not flaky. Galena is flaky. Pumice is not merged. Obsidian is signed. Feldspar has a test yield of 64. Feldspar is signed. Pumice is flaky.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is not signed, that build is not benchmarked. Item B. When the build is not signed, that build is reverted. Item C. When the build is signed, that build is experimental. Item D. When the build is merged, that build has a security advisory. Item E. When the build is not benchmarked, that build has a changelog. Item F. When the build has a changelog, that build is not tested. Item G. When the build has a changelog, that build is tested. Item G is suspended when the build is not flaky. Item C is suspended when the build is not flaky. Item E is suspended when the build has a test yield of no less than 11. Item D is suspended when the build is flaky. Item E is suspended when the build has a test yield of no less than 46. Item F is suspended when the build is flaky. Question: Can one infer that Pumice is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022211", "pair_id": "u022211-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022211-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "aa0785d8d276f976", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u022211-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not signed. Obsidian is not flaky. Galena is flaky. Pumice is not merged. Obsidian is signed. Feldspar has a test yield of 64. Feldspar is signed. Pumice is flaky.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is signed, that build is not benchmarked. Item B. When the build is not signed, that build is reverted. Item C. When the build is signed, that build is experimental. Item D. When the build is merged, that build has a security advisory. Item E. When the build is not benchmarked, that build has a changelog. Item F. When the build has a changelog, that build is not tested. Item G. When the build has a changelog, that build is tested. Item G is suspended when the build is not flaky. Item C is suspended when the build is not flaky. Item E is suspended when the build has a test yield of no less than 11. Item D is suspended when the build is flaky. Item E is suspended when the build has a test yield of no less than 46. Item F is suspended when the build is flaky. Question: Can one infer that Pumice is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022211", "pair_id": "u022211-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022211-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7ebda742c276e10a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u022228-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra is multicenter. Electra is exploratory. Electra has a patent filing. Izar is not cofunded. Electra is not theoretical. Electra has no industry backing. Electra is cofunded. Electra has a postdoc. Izar is not multicenter. Electra has no field site.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is not multicenter, it thereby is not embargoed. Point B. If said proposal is exploratory, it thereby is embargoed. Point C. If said proposal is not resubmitted and further is embargoed, it thereby is budgeted. Point D. If said proposal is cofunded, it thereby is not budgeted. Point E. If said proposal is not theoretical, it thereby has ethics clearance. Point F. If said proposal is not resubmitted and further has a postdoc and further is multicenter, it thereby is longitudinal. Point G. If said proposal has no industry backing and further has no field site, it thereby is interdisciplinary. Point H. If said proposal is interdisciplinary, it thereby is not resubmitted. Point I. If said proposal is embargoed, it thereby is not longitudinal. Point I supersedes Point F. Point A supersedes Point B. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Which choice is true for Electra?", "options": ["is budgeted", "is longitudinal"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is budgeted", "unit_id": "u022228", "pair_id": "u022228-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022228-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4c052e80fcb48ca6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a1"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022228-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra is multicenter. Electra is exploratory. Electra has a patent filing. Izar is not cofunded. Electra is not theoretical. Electra has no industry backing. Electra is cofunded. Electra has a postdoc. Izar is not multicenter. Electra has no field site.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is not multicenter, it thereby is not embargoed. Point B. If said proposal is exploratory, it thereby is embargoed. Point C. If said proposal is not resubmitted and further is embargoed, it thereby is budgeted. Point D. If said proposal is cofunded, it thereby is not budgeted. Point E. If said proposal is theoretical, it thereby has ethics clearance. Point F. If said proposal is not resubmitted and further has a postdoc and further is multicenter, it thereby is longitudinal. Point G. If said proposal has no industry backing and further has no field site, it thereby is interdisciplinary. Point H. If said proposal is interdisciplinary, it thereby is not resubmitted. Point I. If said proposal is embargoed, it thereby is not longitudinal. Point I supersedes Point F. Point A supersedes Point B. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Which choice is true for Electra?", "options": ["is budgeted", "is longitudinal"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is budgeted", "unit_id": "u022228", "pair_id": "u022228-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022228-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7f09bc015e29a705", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a1"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022228-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra is multicenter. Electra is exploratory. Electra has a patent filing. Izar is not cofunded. Electra is not theoretical. Electra has no industry backing. Electra is cofunded. Electra has a postdoc. Izar is not multicenter. Electra has no field site.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is not multicenter, so it is not embargoed. No. 2 While the given proposal is exploratory, so it is embargoed. No. 3 While the given proposal is not resubmitted and likewise is embargoed, so it is budgeted. No. 4 While the given proposal is cofunded, so it is not budgeted. No. 5 While the given proposal is not theoretical, so it has ethics clearance. No. 6 While the given proposal is not resubmitted and likewise has a postdoc and likewise is multicenter, so it is longitudinal. No. 7 While the given proposal has no industry backing and likewise has no field site, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 8 While the given proposal is interdisciplinary, so it is not resubmitted. No. 9 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is not longitudinal. No. 9 wins over No. 6. No. 1 wins over No. 2. No. 3 wins over No. 4. Question: Select what holds for Electra: which option?", "options": ["is budgeted", "is longitudinal"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is budgeted", "unit_id": "u022228", "pair_id": "u022228-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022228-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4c052e80fcb48ca6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a1"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022228-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra is multicenter. Electra is exploratory. Electra has a patent filing. Izar is not cofunded. Electra is not theoretical. Electra has no industry backing. Electra is cofunded. Electra has a postdoc. Izar is not multicenter. Electra has no field site.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is not multicenter, so it is not embargoed. No. 2 While the given proposal is exploratory, so it is embargoed. No. 3 While the given proposal is not resubmitted and likewise is embargoed, so it is budgeted. No. 4 While the given proposal is cofunded, so it is not budgeted. No. 5 While the given proposal is theoretical, so it has ethics clearance. No. 6 While the given proposal is not resubmitted and likewise has a postdoc and likewise is multicenter, so it is longitudinal. No. 7 While the given proposal has no industry backing and likewise has no field site, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 8 While the given proposal is interdisciplinary, so it is not resubmitted. No. 9 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is not longitudinal. No. 9 wins over No. 6. No. 1 wins over No. 2. No. 3 wins over No. 4. Question: Select what holds for Electra: which option?", "options": ["is budgeted", "is longitudinal"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is budgeted", "unit_id": "u022228", "pair_id": "u022228-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022228-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7f09bc015e29a705", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a1"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022285-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss has a patch cycle of 8. Gneiss is backported. Gneiss has a defect tally of 77. Gneiss has a migration script. Gneiss has a test yield of 71. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 25. Gneiss has a security advisory.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is signed, then it is notarized. (2) If a build is notarized and has a lint backlog below 55, then it is not minified. (3) If a build has a defect tally above 66, then it is signed. (4) If a build is backported and has a security advisory and has a migration script, then it has a changelog. (5) If a build is notarized and has a lint backlog of at least 55 and has a patch cycle of at least 16, then it is minified. (6) If a build is documented, then it is not notarized. (7) If a build has a defect tally of at most 79, then it has no changelog. (8) If a build has a security advisory, then it is documented. (6) is void if the build has a security advisory and has a test yield of at least 77. When (7) and (4) clash, (7) prevails. When (2) and (5) clash, (2) prevails. When (1) and (6) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Gneiss is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022285", "pair_id": "u022285-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022285-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8e05b0e250cf7cdb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022285-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss has a patch cycle of 8. Gneiss is backported. Gneiss has a defect tally of 77. Gneiss has a migration script. Gneiss has a test yield of 71. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 25. Gneiss has a security advisory.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is signed, then it is notarized. (2) If a build is notarized and has a lint backlog below 55, then it is not minified. (3) If a build has a defect tally above 66, then it is signed. (4) If a build is backported and has a security advisory and has a migration script, then it has a changelog. (5) If a build is notarized and has a lint backlog of at least 55 and has a patch cycle of at least 16, then it is minified. (6) If a build is documented, then it is not notarized. (7) If a build has a defect tally of at most 50, then it has no changelog. (8) If a build has a security advisory, then it is documented. (6) is void if the build has a security advisory and has a test yield of at least 77. When (7) and (4) clash, (7) prevails. When (2) and (5) clash, (2) prevails. When (1) and (6) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Gneiss is minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022285", "pair_id": "u022285-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022285-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7115519088870623", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022308-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gneiss has a test yield of 90. Zircon has a lint backlog of 30. Zircon is not reproducible. Basalt is reverted. Basalt has a patch cycle of 63. Pumice has a patch cycle of 91. Basalt is not reproducible. Pumice is reverted. Pumice has a defect tally of 61. Basalt has a test yield of 81. Basalt has a lint backlog of 9. Gneiss has a patch cycle of 47. Pumice is reproducible. Zircon is signed. Gneiss has a defect tally of 25. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 49. Basalt is signed. Gneiss is not reverted. Basalt is not benchmarked. Pumice has a lint backlog of 65. Pumice has a test yield of 4. Gneiss is signed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is reproducible while has a lint backlog beyond 35, thus it is fuzzed. Provision 2: when the build here has a patch cycle at or above 39, thus it is not versioned. Provision 3: when the build here is reproducible while has a defect tally at or above 44 while has a lint backlog beneath 42, thus it is flaky. Provision 4: when the build here is reproducible while has a lint backlog at or below 35 while is benchmarked, thus it is profiled. Provision 5: when the build here is reproducible while is benchmarked, thus it has a changelog. Provision 6: when the build here is signed, thus it has a feature toggle. Provision 7: when the build here is reproducible while has a test yield at or above 23 while is not benchmarked, thus it is linted. Provision 8: when the build here is reproducible while has a defect tally beneath 44, thus it is documented. Provision 9: when the build here is reproducible while is not benchmarked while has a patch cycle beneath 52, thus it is tested. Provision 10: when the build here is reproducible while has a test yield beneath 23 while is not reverted, thus it has a migration script. Provision 11: when the build here has a patch cycle at or above 42, thus it is merged. Question: Which one describes Pumice?", "options": ["is flaky", "has a changelog", "is documented", "is fuzzed", "has a migration script", "is tested", "is profiled", "is linted"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is fuzzed", "unit_id": "u022308", "pair_id": "u022308-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/19/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022308-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8754a465ca40fd38", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a15", "a5", "a16", "a4", "a18", "a8", "a7"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u022308-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gneiss has a test yield of 90. Zircon has a lint backlog of 30. Zircon is not reproducible. Basalt is reverted. Basalt has a patch cycle of 63. Pumice has a patch cycle of 91. Basalt is not reproducible. Pumice is reverted. Pumice has a defect tally of 61. Basalt has a test yield of 81. Basalt has a lint backlog of 9. Gneiss has a patch cycle of 47. Pumice is reproducible. Zircon is signed. Gneiss has a defect tally of 25. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 49. Basalt is signed. Gneiss is not reverted. Basalt is not benchmarked. Pumice has a lint backlog of 17. Pumice has a test yield of 4. Gneiss is signed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is reproducible while has a lint backlog beyond 35, thus it is fuzzed. Provision 2: when the build here has a patch cycle at or above 39, thus it is not versioned. Provision 3: when the build here is reproducible while has a defect tally at or above 44 while has a lint backlog beneath 42, thus it is flaky. Provision 4: when the build here is reproducible while has a lint backlog at or below 35 while is benchmarked, thus it is profiled. Provision 5: when the build here is reproducible while is benchmarked, thus it has a changelog. Provision 6: when the build here is signed, thus it has a feature toggle. Provision 7: when the build here is reproducible while has a test yield at or above 23 while is not benchmarked, thus it is linted. Provision 8: when the build here is reproducible while has a defect tally beneath 44, thus it is documented. Provision 9: when the build here is reproducible while is not benchmarked while has a patch cycle beneath 52, thus it is tested. Provision 10: when the build here is reproducible while has a test yield beneath 23 while is not reverted, thus it has a migration script. Provision 11: when the build here has a patch cycle at or above 42, thus it is merged. Question: Which one describes Pumice?", "options": ["is flaky", "has a changelog", "is documented", "is fuzzed", "has a migration script", "is tested", "is profiled", "is linted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is flaky", "unit_id": "u022308", "pair_id": "u022308-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/19/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022308-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "2c933703fc841fae", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a10", "a15", "a5", "a16", "a4", "a18", "a8", "a7"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u022311-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has a beneficiary. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 90. Bruno has no adjuster. Bruno has a payout ceiling of 90.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is retired provided that it has an adjuster. Section 2: a policyholder is not retired provided that it has a peril factor exceeding 26. Section 3: a policyholder is grandfathered provided that it has a peril factor of 31 or higher. Section 4: a policyholder has a premium discount provided that it has a payout ceiling of 49 or higher. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Fabian has a beneficiary. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022311", "pair_id": "u022311-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022311-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "155ee1af18d31bd5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022311-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has a beneficiary. Fabian has no adjuster. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 90. Bruno has no adjuster. Bruno has a payout ceiling of 90.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is retired provided that it has an adjuster. Section 2: a policyholder is not retired provided that it has a peril factor exceeding 26. Section 3: a policyholder is grandfathered provided that it has a peril factor of 31 or higher. Section 4: a policyholder has a premium discount provided that it has a payout ceiling of 49 or higher. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Fabian has a beneficiary. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022311", "pair_id": "u022311-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022311-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5d3e72d307178225", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022311-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has a beneficiary. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 90. Bruno has no adjuster. Bruno has a payout ceiling of 90.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster: then it is retired. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has a peril factor higher than 26: then it is not retired. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a peril factor no lower than 31: then it is grandfathered. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has a payout ceiling no lower than 49: then it has a premium discount. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Fabian has a beneficiary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022311", "pair_id": "u022311-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022311-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "155ee1af18d31bd5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022311-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has a beneficiary. Fabian has no adjuster. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 90. Bruno has no adjuster. Bruno has a payout ceiling of 90.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster: then it is retired. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has a peril factor higher than 26: then it is not retired. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a peril factor no lower than 31: then it is grandfathered. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has a payout ceiling no lower than 49: then it has a premium discount. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Fabian has a beneficiary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022311", "pair_id": "u022311-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022311-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5d3e72d307178225", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022326-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has a commute radius of 45. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 20. Jasna has a seniority step of 29. Olek has a seniority step of 70. Olek is headhunted. Jasna has a portfolio. Olek has a commute radius of 18.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is headhunted while is onboarded, thus it is recommended. Provision 2: when the candidate here has no portfolio, thus it is interviewed. Provision 3: when the candidate here is not a graduate while is headhunted while is certified, thus it is not relocating. Provision 4: when the candidate here is not a graduate while is headhunted while is onboarded, thus it is relocating. Provision 5: when the candidate here has a seniority step beyond 38, thus it is not a graduate. Provision 6: when the candidate here has an aptitude quotient at or below 31, thus it is certified. Provision 5 has no effect when the candidate here is onboarded while has a seniority step at or below 11. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here has a seniority step at or below 81. Provision 5 has no effect when the candidate here has a commute radius beyond 54. Question: Would it be right to say that Olek is relocating?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022326", "pair_id": "u022326-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022326-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ae49866ace8c2d2e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022326-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has a commute radius of 45. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 20. Jasna has a seniority step of 29. Olek has a seniority step of 70. Olek is headhunted. Jasna has a portfolio. Olek has a commute radius of 18.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is headhunted while is onboarded, thus it is recommended. Provision 2: when the candidate here has no portfolio, thus it is interviewed. Provision 3: when the candidate here is not a graduate while is not headhunted while is certified, thus it is not relocating. Provision 4: when the candidate here is not a graduate while is headhunted while is onboarded, thus it is relocating. Provision 5: when the candidate here has a seniority step beyond 38, thus it is not a graduate. Provision 6: when the candidate here has an aptitude quotient at or below 31, thus it is certified. Provision 5 has no effect when the candidate here is onboarded while has a seniority step at or below 11. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here has a seniority step at or below 81. Provision 5 has no effect when the candidate here has a commute radius beyond 54. Question: Would it be right to say that Olek is relocating?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022326", "pair_id": "u022326-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022326-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bdb52cc1d054c7c0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022326-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has a commute radius of 45. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 20. Jasna has a seniority step of 29. Olek has a seniority step of 70. Olek is headhunted. Jasna has a portfolio. Olek has a commute radius of 18.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is headhunted and further is onboarded, it thereby is recommended. Point B. If said candidate has no portfolio, it thereby is interviewed. Point C. If said candidate is not a graduate and further is headhunted and further is certified, it thereby is not relocating. Point D. If said candidate is not a graduate and further is headhunted and further is onboarded, it thereby is relocating. Point E. If said candidate has a seniority step in excess of 38, it thereby is not a graduate. Point F. If said candidate has an aptitude quotient of maximum 31, it thereby is certified. Point E is cancelled if said candidate is onboarded and further has a seniority step of maximum 11. Point A is cancelled if said candidate has a seniority step of maximum 81. Point E is cancelled if said candidate has a commute radius in excess of 54. Question: Statement: Olek is relocating. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022326", "pair_id": "u022326-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022326-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ae49866ace8c2d2e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022326-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has a commute radius of 45. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 20. Jasna has a seniority step of 29. Olek has a seniority step of 70. Olek is headhunted. Jasna has a portfolio. Olek has a commute radius of 18.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is headhunted and further is onboarded, it thereby is recommended. Point B. If said candidate has no portfolio, it thereby is interviewed. Point C. If said candidate is not a graduate and further is not headhunted and further is certified, it thereby is not relocating. Point D. If said candidate is not a graduate and further is headhunted and further is onboarded, it thereby is relocating. Point E. If said candidate has a seniority step in excess of 38, it thereby is not a graduate. Point F. If said candidate has an aptitude quotient of maximum 31, it thereby is certified. Point E is cancelled if said candidate is onboarded and further has a seniority step of maximum 11. Point A is cancelled if said candidate has a seniority step of maximum 81. Point E is cancelled if said candidate has a commute radius in excess of 54. Question: Statement: Olek is relocating. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022326", "pair_id": "u022326-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022326-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bdb52cc1d054c7c0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022331-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vilja is not waitlisted. Vilja is not bedridden. Zora is admitted. Vilja has no pacemaker. Vilja is admitted. Zora is not discharged. Vilja is not triaged. Vilja is discharged. Cosima is triaged.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is bedridden, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 2: when the patient here is rescheduled, thus it has a chaperone. Provision 3: when the patient here is discharged, thus it is rescheduled. Provision 4: when the patient here is diabetic, thus it is postoperative. Provision 5: when the patient here is admitted, thus it has no caregiver. Provision 6: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is pregnant. Provision 7: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is not fasting. Provision 8: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it is sedated. Provision 9: when the patient here has a chaperone, thus it is fasting. Provision 10: when the patient here is hypertensive, thus it is diabetic. Provision 11: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it is symptomatic. Provision 12: when the patient here is not triaged, thus it is not symptomatic. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 12 has priority over Provision 11. Question: Which one describes Vilja?", "options": ["is sedated", "is postoperative", "is fasting"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is fasting", "unit_id": "u022331", "pair_id": "u022331-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/11/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022331-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6efede23a7b05bd6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a11", "a4", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022331-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vilja is not waitlisted. Vilja is not bedridden. Zora is admitted. Vilja has no pacemaker. Vilja is admitted. Zora is not discharged. Vilja is not triaged. Vilja is discharged. Cosima is triaged.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is bedridden, thus it is hypertensive. Provision 2: when the patient here is rescheduled, thus it has a chaperone. Provision 3: when the patient here is discharged, thus it is rescheduled. Provision 4: when the patient here is diabetic, thus it is postoperative. Provision 5: when the patient here is admitted, thus it has no caregiver. Provision 6: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is pregnant. Provision 7: when the patient here is symptomatic, thus it is not fasting. Provision 8: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it is sedated. Provision 9: when the patient here has a chaperone, thus it is fasting. Provision 10: when the patient here is hypertensive, thus it is diabetic. Provision 11: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it is symptomatic. Provision 12: when the patient here is triaged, thus it is not symptomatic. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 12 has priority over Provision 11. Question: Which one describes Vilja?", "options": ["is sedated", "is postoperative", "is fasting"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is fasting", "unit_id": "u022331", "pair_id": "u022331-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/11/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022331-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "7324fe5f4ab7e7c6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a11", "a4", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022352-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is relocating. Kalle is not unionized. Kalle is seasoned. Kalle is a graduate. Mads is headhunted. Kalle is headhunted. Kalle has no visa. Kalle has a portfolio. Mads is not seasoned. Mads has a visa. Kalle is not bilingual. Mads is not licensed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is licensed: then it has a diploma. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is eligible plus is unionized: then it is onboarded. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is headhunted plus is relocating: then it is not eligible. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is headhunted plus is seasoned plus has a visa: then it is eligible. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is eligible plus has a portfolio: then it is not freelance. Policy II is waived if that candidate is licensed. Policy V is waived if that candidate is a graduate. Policy III is waived if that candidate is headhunted plus is bilingual. Question: Is it so that Kalle is eligible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022352", "pair_id": "u022352-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022352-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "938343c4a2ee8e21", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022352-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is relocating. Kalle is not unionized. Kalle is seasoned. Kalle is a graduate. Kalle is licensed. Mads is headhunted. Kalle is headhunted. Kalle has no visa. Kalle has a portfolio. Mads is not seasoned. Mads has a visa. Kalle is not bilingual. Mads is not licensed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is licensed: then it has a diploma. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is eligible plus is unionized: then it is onboarded. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is headhunted plus is relocating: then it is not eligible. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is headhunted plus is seasoned plus has a visa: then it is eligible. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is eligible plus has a portfolio: then it is not freelance. Policy II is waived if that candidate is licensed. Policy V is waived if that candidate is a graduate. Policy III is waived if that candidate is headhunted plus is bilingual. Question: Is it so that Kalle is eligible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022352", "pair_id": "u022352-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022352-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "06650e391b6e4a84", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022352-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is relocating. Kalle is not unionized. Kalle is seasoned. Kalle is a graduate. Mads is headhunted. Kalle is headhunted. Kalle has no visa. Kalle has a portfolio. Mads is not seasoned. Mads has a visa. Kalle is not bilingual. Mads is not licensed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is licensed, it then has a diploma. #2 Each time a candidate is eligible and additionally is unionized, it then is onboarded. #3 Each time a candidate is headhunted and additionally is relocating, it then is not eligible. #4 Each time a candidate is headhunted and additionally is seasoned and additionally has a visa, it then is eligible. #5 Each time a candidate is eligible and additionally has a portfolio, it then is not freelance. #2 is set aside if a candidate is licensed. #5 is set aside if a candidate is a graduate. #3 is set aside if a candidate is headhunted and additionally is bilingual. Question: Do the terms above show that Kalle is eligible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022352", "pair_id": "u022352-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022352-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "938343c4a2ee8e21", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022352-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is relocating. Kalle is not unionized. Kalle is seasoned. Kalle is a graduate. Kalle is licensed. Mads is headhunted. Kalle is headhunted. Kalle has no visa. Kalle has a portfolio. Mads is not seasoned. Mads has a visa. Kalle is not bilingual. Mads is not licensed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is licensed, it then has a diploma. #2 Each time a candidate is eligible and additionally is unionized, it then is onboarded. #3 Each time a candidate is headhunted and additionally is relocating, it then is not eligible. #4 Each time a candidate is headhunted and additionally is seasoned and additionally has a visa, it then is eligible. #5 Each time a candidate is eligible and additionally has a portfolio, it then is not freelance. #2 is set aside if a candidate is licensed. #5 is set aside if a candidate is a graduate. #3 is set aside if a candidate is headhunted and additionally is bilingual. Question: Do the terms above show that Kalle is eligible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022352", "pair_id": "u022352-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022352-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "06650e391b6e4a84", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022371-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Deneb has no patent filing. Deneb is not budgeted. Capella is budgeted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has a patent filing, it also is peer reviewed. Clause 2: once any proposal is exploratory, it also is translational. Clause 3: once any proposal has industry backing, it also is theoretical. Clause 4: once any proposal is renewed, it also has industry backing. Clause 5: once any proposal is renewed, it also is not longitudinal. Clause 6: once any proposal is not budgeted, it also is exploratory. Clause 7: once any proposal is budgeted, it also is embargoed. Clause 8: once any proposal is embargoed, it also is interdisciplinary. Clause 9: once any proposal has industry backing, it also has ethics clearance. Clause 8 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not budgeted. Clause 5 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is budgeted. Clause 1 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is budgeted. Clause 9 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is budgeted. Question: Which of these is true of Deneb?", "options": ["is interdisciplinary", "is theoretical", "is translational"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is translational", "unit_id": "u022371", "pair_id": "u022371-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022371-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bb334f9fff0b0a44", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a8", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022371-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Deneb has a patent filing. Deneb is not budgeted. Capella is budgeted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has a patent filing, it also is peer reviewed. Clause 2: once any proposal is exploratory, it also is translational. Clause 3: once any proposal has industry backing, it also is theoretical. Clause 4: once any proposal is renewed, it also has industry backing. Clause 5: once any proposal is renewed, it also is not longitudinal. Clause 6: once any proposal is not budgeted, it also is exploratory. Clause 7: once any proposal is budgeted, it also is embargoed. Clause 8: once any proposal is embargoed, it also is interdisciplinary. Clause 9: once any proposal has industry backing, it also has ethics clearance. Clause 8 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not budgeted. Clause 5 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is budgeted. Clause 1 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is budgeted. Clause 9 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is budgeted. Question: Which of these is true of Deneb?", "options": ["is interdisciplinary", "is theoretical", "is translational"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is translational", "unit_id": "u022371", "pair_id": "u022371-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022371-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fbc2a1b34ec2073e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a8", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022384-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fomalhaut is not resubmitted. Hadar is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut is collaborative. Kochab is not peer reviewed. Fomalhaut has seed funding. Fomalhaut is not peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is a pilot study provided that it is endorsed. Section 2: a proposal has a steering committee provided that it is translational. Section 3: a proposal is preregistered provided that it is collaborative. Section 4: a proposal is exploratory provided that it is budgeted. Section 5: a proposal has a patent filing provided that it is exploratory. Section 6: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it is resubmitted. Section 7: a proposal has industry backing provided that it has a field site. Section 8: a proposal has no patent filing provided that it is preregistered. Section 9: a proposal has no steering committee provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 10: a proposal is translational provided that it is longitudinal. Section 11: a proposal is endorsed provided that it is preregistered. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Which statement fits Fomalhaut?", "options": ["is a pilot study", "has a steering committee", "has a patent filing"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a pilot study", "unit_id": "u022384", "pair_id": "u022384-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022384-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "cda9abf0406ca0e3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a9", "a4", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022384-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fomalhaut is not resubmitted. Hadar is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut is collaborative. Kochab is not peer reviewed. Fomalhaut has seed funding. Fomalhaut is not peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is a pilot study provided that it is endorsed. Section 2: a proposal is budgeted provided that it has seed funding. Section 3: a proposal has a steering committee provided that it is translational. Section 4: a proposal is preregistered provided that it is collaborative. Section 5: a proposal is exploratory provided that it is budgeted. Section 6: a proposal has a patent filing provided that it is exploratory. Section 7: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it is resubmitted. Section 8: a proposal has industry backing provided that it has a field site. Section 9: a proposal has no patent filing provided that it is preregistered. Section 10: a proposal has no steering committee provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 11: a proposal is translational provided that it is longitudinal. Section 12: a proposal is endorsed provided that it is preregistered. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 6. Question: Which statement fits Fomalhaut?", "options": ["is a pilot study", "has a steering committee", "has a patent filing"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a pilot study", "unit_id": "u022384", "pair_id": "u022384-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022384-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "786cae091ab9a352", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a9", "a4", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022384-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fomalhaut is not resubmitted. Hadar is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut is collaborative. Kochab is not peer reviewed. Fomalhaut has seed funding. Fomalhaut is not peer reviewed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is endorsed, it then is a pilot study. #2 Each time a proposal is translational, it then has a steering committee. #3 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then is preregistered. #4 Each time a proposal is budgeted, it then is exploratory. #5 Each time a proposal is exploratory, it then has a patent filing. #6 Each time a proposal is resubmitted, it then is longitudinal. #7 Each time a proposal has a field site, it then has industry backing. #8 Each time a proposal is preregistered, it then has no patent filing. #9 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then has no steering committee. #10 Each time a proposal is longitudinal, it then is translational. #11 Each time a proposal is preregistered, it then is endorsed. #9 yields to #2. #5 yields to #8. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Fomalhaut?", "options": ["is a pilot study", "has a steering committee", "has a patent filing"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a pilot study", "unit_id": "u022384", "pair_id": "u022384-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022384-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "cda9abf0406ca0e3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a9", "a4", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022384-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fomalhaut is not resubmitted. Hadar is not resubmitted. Fomalhaut is collaborative. Kochab is not peer reviewed. Fomalhaut has seed funding. Fomalhaut is not peer reviewed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is endorsed, it then is a pilot study. #2 Each time a proposal has seed funding, it then is budgeted. #3 Each time a proposal is translational, it then has a steering committee. #4 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then is preregistered. #5 Each time a proposal is budgeted, it then is exploratory. #6 Each time a proposal is exploratory, it then has a patent filing. #7 Each time a proposal is resubmitted, it then is longitudinal. #8 Each time a proposal has a field site, it then has industry backing. #9 Each time a proposal is preregistered, it then has no patent filing. #10 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then has no steering committee. #11 Each time a proposal is longitudinal, it then is translational. #12 Each time a proposal is preregistered, it then is endorsed. #10 yields to #3. #6 yields to #9. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Fomalhaut?", "options": ["is a pilot study", "has a steering committee", "has a patent filing"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a pilot study", "unit_id": "u022384", "pair_id": "u022384-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022384-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "786cae091ab9a352", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a9", "a4", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022385-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has a visa. Mads is not seasoned. Teodor is bilingual. Teodor is not seasoned. Rune is sponsored. Rune is seasoned. Mads is bilingual.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is not probationary. Provision 2: when the candidate here is interviewed, thus it is headhunted. Provision 3: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is probationary. Provision 4: when the candidate here is seasoned, thus it is interviewed. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here is sponsored. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here is bilingual. Provision 3 has no effect when the candidate here is bilingual. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Rune is probationary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022385", "pair_id": "u022385-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022385-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "55e00cd4d0f7e16b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u022385-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has a visa. Mads is not seasoned. Teodor is bilingual. Teodor is not seasoned. Rune is sponsored. Rune is seasoned. Mads is bilingual.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is not probationary. Provision 2: when the candidate here is interviewed, thus it is headhunted. Provision 3: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is probationary. Provision 4: when the candidate here is seasoned, thus it is interviewed. Provision 5: when the candidate here has a visa, thus it is licensed. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here is sponsored. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here is bilingual. Provision 3 has no effect when the candidate here is bilingual. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Rune is probationary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022385", "pair_id": "u022385-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022385-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b527cb085c46f495", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u022385-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has a visa. Mads is not seasoned. Teodor is bilingual. Teodor is not seasoned. Rune is sponsored. Rune is seasoned. Mads is bilingual.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is headhunted, it thereby is not probationary. Point B. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby is headhunted. Point C. If said candidate is headhunted, it thereby is probationary. Point D. If said candidate is seasoned, it thereby is interviewed. Point A is cancelled if said candidate is sponsored. Point A is cancelled if said candidate is bilingual. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is bilingual. Point A supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Rune is probationary. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022385", "pair_id": "u022385-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022385-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "55e00cd4d0f7e16b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u022385-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has a visa. Mads is not seasoned. Teodor is bilingual. Teodor is not seasoned. Rune is sponsored. Rune is seasoned. Mads is bilingual.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is headhunted, it thereby is not probationary. Point B. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby is headhunted. Point C. If said candidate is headhunted, it thereby is probationary. Point D. If said candidate is seasoned, it thereby is interviewed. Point E. If said candidate has a visa, it thereby is licensed. Point A is cancelled if said candidate is sponsored. Point A is cancelled if said candidate is bilingual. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is bilingual. Point A supersedes Point C. Question: Statement: Rune is probationary. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022385", "pair_id": "u022385-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022385-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b527cb085c46f495", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u022385-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has a visa. Mads is not seasoned. Teodor is bilingual. Teodor is not seasoned. Rune is sponsored. Rune is seasoned. Mads is bilingual.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is headhunted, so it is not probationary. No. 2 While the given candidate is interviewed, so it is headhunted. No. 3 While the given candidate is headhunted, so it is probationary. No. 4 While the given candidate is seasoned, so it is interviewed. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given candidate is sponsored. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given candidate is bilingual. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is bilingual. No. 1 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Rune is probationary\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022385", "pair_id": "u022385-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022385-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "55e00cd4d0f7e16b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u022385-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune has a visa. Mads is not seasoned. Teodor is bilingual. Teodor is not seasoned. Rune is sponsored. Rune is seasoned. Mads is bilingual.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is headhunted, so it is not probationary. No. 2 While the given candidate is interviewed, so it is headhunted. No. 3 While the given candidate is headhunted, so it is probationary. No. 4 While the given candidate is seasoned, so it is interviewed. No. 5 While the given candidate has a visa, so it is licensed. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given candidate is sponsored. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given candidate is bilingual. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is bilingual. No. 1 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Rune is probationary\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022385", "pair_id": "u022385-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022385-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b527cb085c46f495", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u022386-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is throttled. Juno is sandboxed. Juno is not encrypted. Juno is idle. Juno is not patched.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is not monitored provided that it is stateless as well as is not throttled. Section 2: a workload is virtualized provided that it is encrypted as well as is sandboxed. Section 3: a workload is stateless provided that it has a firewall. Section 4: a workload is monitored provided that it is stateless as well as is sandboxed as well as has a public endpoint. Section 5: a workload has a public endpoint provided that it is patched. Section 6: a workload has a firewall provided that it is idle as well as is sandboxed. Section 7: a workload is not autoscaled provided that it is sharded. Question: Juno is not monitored. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022386", "pair_id": "u022386-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022386-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "2c5e4143786a3a43", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022386-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is throttled. Juno is sandboxed. Juno is not encrypted. Juno is idle. Juno is not patched.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is not monitored provided that it is stateless as well as is throttled. Section 2: a workload is virtualized provided that it is encrypted as well as is sandboxed. Section 3: a workload is stateless provided that it has a firewall. Section 4: a workload is monitored provided that it is stateless as well as is sandboxed as well as has a public endpoint. Section 5: a workload has a public endpoint provided that it is patched. Section 6: a workload has a firewall provided that it is idle as well as is sandboxed. Section 7: a workload is not autoscaled provided that it is sharded. Question: Juno is not monitored. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022386", "pair_id": "u022386-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022386-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "e8e275ea0a6f28ed", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022403-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not reverted. Schist is not benchmarked. Gneiss is profiled. Gneiss is not benchmarked. Schist has a changelog. Gneiss is not backported. Schist is not profiled. Gneiss has no changelog.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has no changelog, it then is reproducible. #2 Each time a build is versioned, it then is not tested. #3 Each time a build has no feature toggle, it then is not reproducible. #4 Each time a build is versioned, it then is tested. #5 Each time a build is not backported, it then is notarized. #6 Each time a build is reverted, it then is versioned. #4 is set aside if a build is not profiled. #2 is set aside if a build is profiled. #1 is set aside if a build is profiled. #5 is set aside if a build has a changelog. #2 is set aside if a build is benchmarked. #4 yields to #2. #1 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Gneiss is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022403", "pair_id": "u022403-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022403-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8b88321ba9701308", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022403-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not reverted. Schist is not benchmarked. Gneiss is profiled. Gneiss is not benchmarked. Schist has a changelog. Gneiss is not backported. Schist is not profiled. Gneiss is reverted. Gneiss has no changelog.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has no changelog, it then is reproducible. #2 Each time a build is versioned, it then is not tested. #3 Each time a build has no feature toggle, it then is not reproducible. #4 Each time a build is versioned, it then is tested. #5 Each time a build is not backported, it then is notarized. #6 Each time a build is reverted, it then is versioned. #4 is set aside if a build is not profiled. #2 is set aside if a build is profiled. #1 is set aside if a build is profiled. #5 is set aside if a build has a changelog. #2 is set aside if a build is benchmarked. #4 yields to #2. #1 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Gneiss is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022403", "pair_id": "u022403-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022403-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "548a15dea60926f8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022422-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is labeled. Kaveh has a courier. Thilo has a courier. Kaveh is not labeled. Nandor has no courier.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is prepaid and is not labeled and has no courier, then it is sealed. Question: Is it true that Nandor is rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022422", "pair_id": "u022422-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022422-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "3a8a1315fa91a43d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022422-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is labeled. Kaveh has a courier. Thilo has a courier. Nandor is rerouted. Kaveh is not labeled. Nandor has no courier.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is prepaid and is not labeled and has no courier, then it is sealed. Question: Is it true that Nandor is rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022422", "pair_id": "u022422-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022422-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "14d434f6d78adc9d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022450-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is not a graduate. Noor is not a graduate. Teodor has no background screening. Olek has a visa. Noor is eligible.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is licensed provided that it is not bilingual. Section 2: a candidate is not probationary provided that it is not a graduate as well as has a visa. Section 3: a candidate is probationary provided that it has a background screening. Section 4: a candidate is freelance provided that it is eligible. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Olek has a background screening. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022450", "pair_id": "u022450-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022450-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fa013bf438fba862", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022450-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is not a graduate. Olek has a background screening. Noor is not a graduate. Teodor has no background screening. Olek has a visa. Noor is eligible.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is licensed provided that it is not bilingual. Section 2: a candidate is not probationary provided that it is not a graduate as well as has a visa. Section 3: a candidate is probationary provided that it has a background screening. Section 4: a candidate is freelance provided that it is eligible. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Olek has a background screening. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022450", "pair_id": "u022450-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022450-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "354f9f6861a7377f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022450-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is not a graduate. Noor is not a graduate. Teodor has no background screening. Olek has a visa. Noor is eligible.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is not bilingual: then it is licensed. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is not a graduate plus has a visa: then it is not probationary. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a background screening: then it is probationary. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is eligible: then it is freelance. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Olek has a background screening?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022450", "pair_id": "u022450-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022450-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fa013bf438fba862", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022450-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is not a graduate. Olek has a background screening. Noor is not a graduate. Teodor has no background screening. Olek has a visa. Noor is eligible.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is not bilingual: then it is licensed. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is not a graduate plus has a visa: then it is not probationary. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a background screening: then it is probationary. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is eligible: then it is freelance. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Olek has a background screening?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022450", "pair_id": "u022450-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022450-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "354f9f6861a7377f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022505-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is not cached. Cobalt has no firewall. Vesper is not deprecated. Zephyr is deprecated. Cobalt is deprecated. Cobalt is not containerized.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is not containerized, it also is idle. Clause 2: once any workload has no failover node and also is not cached, it also is sandboxed. Clause 3: once any workload is replicated and also is deprecated, it also has no failover node. Clause 4: once any workload has no failover node and also is cached, it also is not sandboxed. Clause 3 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a firewall. Clause 4 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Cobalt is sandboxed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022505", "pair_id": "u022505-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022505-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "000a01053c9bcacf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u022505-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is not cached. Cobalt has no firewall. Vesper is not deprecated. Zephyr is deprecated. Cobalt is deprecated. Cobalt is not containerized.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is deprecated, it also is replicated. Clause 2: once any workload is not containerized, it also is idle. Clause 3: once any workload has no failover node and also is not cached, it also is sandboxed. Clause 4: once any workload is replicated and also is deprecated, it also has no failover node. Clause 5: once any workload has no failover node and also is cached, it also is not sandboxed. Clause 4 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a firewall. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Cobalt is sandboxed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022505", "pair_id": "u022505-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022505-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "03104b8c3b40457a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u022507-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has a claim frequency of 83. Zdenek has no deductible waiver. Zdenek is subrogated. Zdenek is reimbursed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is reimbursed, it also is lapsed. Clause 2: once any policyholder has a claim frequency of 59 or more, it also is uninsurable. Clause 3: once any policyholder is not subrogated, it also is a claimant. Clause 4: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also is not inspected. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also is inspected. Clause 4 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a payout ceiling over 73. Clause 4 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is bundled. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is subrogated. Clause 5 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a payout ceiling of 73 or less. Question: Does it follow that Zdenek is inspected?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022507", "pair_id": "u022507-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022507-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "49805b0ffb397c67", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022507-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has a claim frequency of 83. Zdenek has no deductible waiver. Zdenek is subrogated. Zdenek is reimbursed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is reimbursed, it also is lapsed. Clause 2: once any policyholder has a claim frequency of 59 or more, it also is uninsurable. Clause 3: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also is a claimant. Clause 4: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also is not inspected. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also is inspected. Clause 4 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a payout ceiling over 73. Clause 4 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is bundled. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is subrogated. Clause 5 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a payout ceiling of 73 or less. Question: Does it follow that Zdenek is inspected?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022507", "pair_id": "u022507-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022507-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8771eecdb73c13e4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022542-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fabian is appraised. Fabian has no dashcam. Bruno has a deductible waiver. Celeste has a dashcam. Bruno has a dashcam. Celeste has a deductible waiver. Fabian has a deductible waiver.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has no roadside assistance, so it is disputed. No. 2 While the given policyholder has no deductible waiver, so it is a claimant. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not retired, so it is grandfathered. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is not subrogated. No. 5 While the given policyholder is not litigated, so it has an adjuster. No. 6 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it is not retired. No. 7 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is reinstated. No. 8 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it has no roadside assistance. No. 9 While the given policyholder has a rider, so it is covered. No. 10 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is inspected. No. 11 While the given policyholder is litigated, so it has a rider. Question: Select what holds for Celeste: which option?", "options": ["is disputed", "is covered", "is inspected", "is reinstated", "is grandfathered"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is disputed", "unit_id": "u022542", "pair_id": "u022542-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022542-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "64ded54e20f500a0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a8", "a11", "a10", "a13"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022542-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fabian is appraised. Fabian has no dashcam. Bruno has a deductible waiver. Celeste has no dashcam. Bruno has a dashcam. Celeste has a deductible waiver. Fabian has a deductible waiver.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has no roadside assistance, so it is disputed. No. 2 While the given policyholder has no deductible waiver, so it is a claimant. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not retired, so it is grandfathered. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is not subrogated. No. 5 While the given policyholder is not litigated, so it has an adjuster. No. 6 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it is not retired. No. 7 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is reinstated. No. 8 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it has no roadside assistance. No. 9 While the given policyholder has a rider, so it is covered. No. 10 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is inspected. No. 11 While the given policyholder is litigated, so it has a rider. Question: Select what holds for Celeste: which option?", "options": ["is disputed", "is covered", "is inspected", "is reinstated", "is grandfathered"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is disputed", "unit_id": "u022542", "pair_id": "u022542-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022542-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "b3a61c5e59b068d2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a8", "a11", "a10", "a13"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022554-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is preregistered. Kochab has a citation index of 36. Hadar has a citation index of 0.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is cofunded, it then has no field site. #2 Each time a proposal is not preregistered, it then is not interdisciplinary. #3 Each time a proposal has a citation index greater than 78, it then is budgeted. #4 Each time a proposal is budgeted, it then is not shortlisted. #5 Each time a proposal has a citation index of 78 or below, it then is cofunded. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Kochab?", "options": ["is cofunded", "is budgeted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is cofunded", "unit_id": "u022554", "pair_id": "u022554-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022554-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "0472af4b40eb4152", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a5"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022554-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is preregistered. Kochab has a citation index of 99. Hadar has a citation index of 0.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is cofunded, it then has no field site. #2 Each time a proposal is not preregistered, it then is not interdisciplinary. #3 Each time a proposal has a citation index greater than 78, it then is budgeted. #4 Each time a proposal is budgeted, it then is not shortlisted. #5 Each time a proposal has a citation index of 78 or below, it then is cofunded. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Kochab?", "options": ["is cofunded", "is budgeted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is budgeted", "unit_id": "u022554", "pair_id": "u022554-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022554-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "b0249e6437cc8d0b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a5"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022557-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor has a weight class of 29. Quentin is undeliverable. Thilo has a weight class of 60. Quentin has a weight class of 8.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is weighed provided that it is not labeled. Section 2: a parcel is scanned provided that it is oversized. Section 3: a parcel has a barcode provided that it has a weight class lower than 80. Section 4: a parcel has no courier provided that it is undeliverable. Section 5: a parcel has no locker slot provided that it is not oversized. Section 6: a parcel is refrigerated provided that it is oversized. Section 7: a parcel is not weighed provided that it is consolidated. Section 8: a parcel is consolidated provided that it is refrigerated. Question: Quentin is weighed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022557", "pair_id": "u022557-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022557-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "9d3c536af9f6b51a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022557-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor has a weight class of 29. Quentin is undeliverable. Thilo has a weight class of 60. Quentin has a weight class of 8.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is weighed provided that it is not labeled. Section 2: a parcel is scanned provided that it is oversized. Section 3: a parcel has a barcode provided that it has a weight class lower than 80. Section 4: a parcel is not labeled provided that it has a barcode. Section 5: a parcel has no courier provided that it is undeliverable. Section 6: a parcel has no locker slot provided that it is not oversized. Section 7: a parcel is refrigerated provided that it is oversized. Section 8: a parcel is not weighed provided that it is consolidated. Section 9: a parcel is consolidated provided that it is refrigerated. Question: Quentin is weighed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022557", "pair_id": "u022557-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022557-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "eb0992cfdcb04361", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022557-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor has a weight class of 29. Quentin is undeliverable. Thilo has a weight class of 60. Quentin has a weight class of 8.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not labeled: then it is weighed. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is scanned. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a weight class smaller than 80: then it has a barcode. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is undeliverable: then it has no courier. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is not oversized: then it has no locker slot. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is refrigerated. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is consolidated: then it is not weighed. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated: then it is consolidated. Question: Is it so that Quentin is weighed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022557", "pair_id": "u022557-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022557-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "9d3c536af9f6b51a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022557-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor has a weight class of 29. Quentin is undeliverable. Thilo has a weight class of 60. Quentin has a weight class of 8.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not labeled: then it is weighed. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is scanned. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a weight class smaller than 80: then it has a barcode. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is not labeled. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is undeliverable: then it has no courier. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is not oversized: then it has no locker slot. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is refrigerated. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is consolidated: then it is not weighed. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated: then it is consolidated. Question: Is it so that Quentin is weighed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022557", "pair_id": "u022557-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022557-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "eb0992cfdcb04361", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022565-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not containerized. Sierra has no failover node. Sierra has a public endpoint. Sierra is cached.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is containerized, then it is monitored. (2) If a workload is containerized, then it is not monitored. (3) If a workload is monitored, then it has no GPU. (4) If a workload has no failover node, then it is not sandboxed. (5) If a workload is monitored, then it has a GPU. (2) is void if the workload has a public endpoint. (5) is void if the workload is cached. (3) is void if the workload is idle. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Sierra has a GPU?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022565", "pair_id": "u022565-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022565-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1704c3a6d895206c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022565-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not containerized. Sierra has no failover node. Sierra has a public endpoint. Sierra is cached.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is containerized, then it is monitored. (2) If a workload is containerized, then it is not monitored. (3) If a workload is monitored, then it has no GPU. (4) If a workload has a failover node, then it is not sandboxed. (5) If a workload is monitored, then it has a GPU. (2) is void if the workload has a public endpoint. (5) is void if the workload is cached. (3) is void if the workload is idle. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Sierra has a GPU?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022565", "pair_id": "u022565-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022565-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b6c2de399f4b6765", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022565-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not containerized. Sierra has no failover node. Sierra has a public endpoint. Sierra is cached.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is containerized, that workload is monitored. Item B. When the workload is containerized, that workload is not monitored. Item C. When the workload is monitored, that workload has no GPU. Item D. When the workload has no failover node, that workload is not sandboxed. Item E. When the workload is monitored, that workload has a GPU. Item B is suspended when the workload has a public endpoint. Item E is suspended when the workload is cached. Item C is suspended when the workload is idle. Item E outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Sierra has a GPU?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022565", "pair_id": "u022565-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022565-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1704c3a6d895206c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022565-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is not containerized. Sierra has no failover node. Sierra has a public endpoint. Sierra is cached.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is containerized, that workload is monitored. Item B. When the workload is containerized, that workload is not monitored. Item C. When the workload is monitored, that workload has no GPU. Item D. When the workload has a failover node, that workload is not sandboxed. Item E. When the workload is monitored, that workload has a GPU. Item B is suspended when the workload has a public endpoint. Item E is suspended when the workload is cached. Item C is suspended when the workload is idle. Item E outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Sierra has a GPU?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022565", "pair_id": "u022565-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022565-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b6c2de399f4b6765", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022578-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is not flaky. Obsidian is tested. Basalt is documented. Obsidian has a patch cycle of 91. Obsidian is not flaky. Obsidian is not documented.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is not documented: then it is profiled. Policy II. Suppose that build is documented: then it is not experimental. Policy III. Suppose that build is tested: then it is fuzzed. Policy IV. Suppose that build is flaky: then it is experimental. Policy V. Suppose that build is flaky: then it is not localized. Policy VI. Suppose that build is profiled: then it is not backported. Policy VII. Suppose that build has no changelog: then it is not obsolete. Policy VIII. Suppose that build has a patch cycle smaller than 81: then it is not profiled. Policy IX. Suppose that build has no changelog: then it is obsolete. Policy X. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is backported. Policy XI. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is localized. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy XI. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy X. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Obsidian is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022578", "pair_id": "u022578-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022578-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cd60ab628cb785d9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022578-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is not flaky. Obsidian is tested. Basalt is documented. Obsidian has a patch cycle of 91. Obsidian is not flaky. Obsidian is not documented.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is documented: then it is profiled. Policy II. Suppose that build is documented: then it is not experimental. Policy III. Suppose that build is tested: then it is fuzzed. Policy IV. Suppose that build is flaky: then it is experimental. Policy V. Suppose that build is flaky: then it is not localized. Policy VI. Suppose that build is profiled: then it is not backported. Policy VII. Suppose that build has no changelog: then it is not obsolete. Policy VIII. Suppose that build has a patch cycle smaller than 81: then it is not profiled. Policy IX. Suppose that build has no changelog: then it is obsolete. Policy X. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is backported. Policy XI. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is localized. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy XI. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy X. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Obsidian is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022578", "pair_id": "u022578-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022578-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3bd443fbac382199", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022587-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not oversized. Kaveh is delayed. Kaveh has a locker slot. Kaveh is tracked.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel has a courier and is tracked, then it is stamped. (2) If a parcel is delayed and has no locker slot, then it is not refrigerated. (3) If a parcel is delayed and is oversized and is labeled, then it is refrigerated. When (3) and (2) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Kaveh is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022587", "pair_id": "u022587-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022587-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "65441a3a2c163375", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022587-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not oversized. Kaveh is delayed. Kaveh has a locker slot. Kaveh is tracked.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel has a courier and is tracked, then it is stamped. (2) If a parcel is delayed and has a locker slot, then it is not refrigerated. (3) If a parcel is delayed and is oversized and is labeled, then it is refrigerated. When (3) and (2) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Kaveh is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022587", "pair_id": "u022587-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022587-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4b767402f735b070", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022587-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not oversized. Kaveh is delayed. Kaveh has a locker slot. Kaveh is tracked.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel has a courier and also is tracked, it also is stamped. Clause 2: once any parcel is delayed and also has no locker slot, it also is not refrigerated. Clause 3: once any parcel is delayed and also is oversized and also is labeled, it also is refrigerated. Clause 3 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Kaveh is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022587", "pair_id": "u022587-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022587-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "65441a3a2c163375", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022587-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not oversized. Kaveh is delayed. Kaveh has a locker slot. Kaveh is tracked.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel has a courier and also is tracked, it also is stamped. Clause 2: once any parcel is delayed and also has a locker slot, it also is not refrigerated. Clause 3: once any parcel is delayed and also is oversized and also is labeled, it also is refrigerated. Clause 3 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Kaveh is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022587", "pair_id": "u022587-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022587-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4b767402f735b070", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022587-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not oversized. Kaveh is delayed. Kaveh has a locker slot. Kaveh is tracked.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel has a courier, and is tracked, that parcel is stamped. Item B. When the parcel is delayed, and has no locker slot, that parcel is not refrigerated. Item C. When the parcel is delayed, and is oversized, and is labeled, that parcel is refrigerated. Item C outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Kaveh is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022587", "pair_id": "u022587-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022587-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "65441a3a2c163375", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022587-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is not oversized. Kaveh is delayed. Kaveh has a locker slot. Kaveh is tracked.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel has a courier, and is tracked, that parcel is stamped. Item B. When the parcel is delayed, and has a locker slot, that parcel is not refrigerated. Item C. When the parcel is delayed, and is oversized, and is labeled, that parcel is refrigerated. Item C outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Kaveh is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022587", "pair_id": "u022587-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022587-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4b767402f735b070", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022616-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is not licensed. Teodor is not licensed. Rune has an aptitude quotient of 94. Rune is not probationary. Sigrid is licensed. Rune has no portfolio.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate has an aptitude quotient above 13, then it is not bilingual. (2) If a candidate is licensed, then it is bilingual. (3) If a candidate has no portfolio, then it is not freelance. Question: Is it true that Rune is bilingual?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022616", "pair_id": "u022616-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022616-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "798aa844f86c5bbf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022616-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is not licensed. Teodor is not licensed. Rune has an aptitude quotient of 94. Rune is not probationary. Sigrid is licensed. Rune has no portfolio.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate has an aptitude quotient above 13, then it is not bilingual. (2) If a candidate is licensed, then it is bilingual. (3) If a candidate has a portfolio, then it is not freelance. Question: Is it true that Rune is bilingual?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022616", "pair_id": "u022616-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022616-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "39352d745e96b989", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022616-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is not licensed. Teodor is not licensed. Rune has an aptitude quotient of 94. Rune is not probationary. Sigrid is licensed. Rune has no portfolio.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate has an aptitude quotient over 13, it also is not bilingual. Clause 2: once any candidate is licensed, it also is bilingual. Clause 3: once any candidate has no portfolio, it also is not freelance. Question: Does it follow that Rune is bilingual?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022616", "pair_id": "u022616-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022616-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "798aa844f86c5bbf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022616-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is not licensed. Teodor is not licensed. Rune has an aptitude quotient of 94. Rune is not probationary. Sigrid is licensed. Rune has no portfolio.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate has an aptitude quotient over 13, it also is not bilingual. Clause 2: once any candidate is licensed, it also is bilingual. Clause 3: once any candidate has a portfolio, it also is not freelance. Question: Does it follow that Rune is bilingual?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022616", "pair_id": "u022616-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022616-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "39352d745e96b989", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022622-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma has a field site. Gemma has a team size of 57. Betelgeuse has a milestone total of 60. Betelgeuse has a team size of 52. Gemma has a review mark of 24. Betelgeuse has a review mark of 21. Gemma has a milestone total of 80. Betelgeuse is collaborative. Gemma is not budgeted. Gemma is not translational. Betelgeuse is budgeted. Betelgeuse is endorsed. Betelgeuse has a field site. Gemma is not collaborative.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is not cofunded provided that it is renewed as well as has a milestone total exceeding 81 as well as has a review mark lower than 64. Section 2: a proposal is cofunded provided that it is renewed as well as has a milestone total of 53 or lower as well as has a team size lower than 23. Section 3: a proposal has no postdoc provided that it has a field site as well as is budgeted. Section 4: a proposal is renewed provided that it has no postdoc as well as is endorsed as well as has a team size of 70 or lower. Section 5: a proposal is not embargoed provided that it has a citation index of 72 or lower as well as has a review mark lower than 44. Section 6: a proposal is theoretical provided that it is translational as well as has a team size of 46 or higher as well as is budgeted. Section 7: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it has a team size of 50 or higher. Section 4 lapses for a proposal if it is collaborative as well as has no field site. Section 5 lapses for a proposal if it is translational. Question: Betelgeuse is cofunded. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022622", "pair_id": "u022622-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022622-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4c6fd509f646f1f2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022622-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma has a field site. Gemma has a team size of 57. Betelgeuse has a milestone total of 60. Betelgeuse has a team size of 52. Gemma has a review mark of 24. Betelgeuse has a review mark of 21. Gemma has a milestone total of 80. Betelgeuse is collaborative. Gemma is not budgeted. Gemma is not translational. Betelgeuse is budgeted. Betelgeuse is endorsed. Betelgeuse has a field site. Gemma is not collaborative.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is not cofunded provided that it is renewed as well as has a milestone total exceeding 53 as well as has a review mark lower than 64. Section 2: a proposal is cofunded provided that it is renewed as well as has a milestone total of 53 or lower as well as has a team size lower than 23. Section 3: a proposal has no postdoc provided that it has a field site as well as is budgeted. Section 4: a proposal is renewed provided that it has no postdoc as well as is endorsed as well as has a team size of 70 or lower. Section 5: a proposal is not embargoed provided that it has a citation index of 72 or lower as well as has a review mark lower than 44. Section 6: a proposal is theoretical provided that it is translational as well as has a team size of 46 or higher as well as is budgeted. Section 7: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it has a team size of 50 or higher. Section 4 lapses for a proposal if it is collaborative as well as has no field site. Section 5 lapses for a proposal if it is translational. Question: Betelgeuse is cofunded. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022622", "pair_id": "u022622-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022622-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c60fe27648f18dab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022652-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf has a fever reading of 3. Benedek is not diabetic. Yusuf is sedated. Benedek is sedated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is diabetic, so it is admitted. No. 2 While the given patient has a fever reading that exceeds 14, so it is triaged. No. 3 While the given patient is admitted, so it is symptomatic. No. 4 While the given patient is triaged, so it is not symptomatic. No. 5 While the given patient is sedated, so it is allergic. Question: Is the claim \"Yusuf is symptomatic\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022652", "pair_id": "u022652-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022652-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "770a8e3947ce3cbc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022652-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf is diabetic. Yusuf has a fever reading of 3. Benedek is not diabetic. Yusuf is sedated. Benedek is sedated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is diabetic, so it is admitted. No. 2 While the given patient has a fever reading that exceeds 14, so it is triaged. No. 3 While the given patient is admitted, so it is symptomatic. No. 4 While the given patient is triaged, so it is not symptomatic. No. 5 While the given patient is sedated, so it is allergic. Question: Is the claim \"Yusuf is symptomatic\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022652", "pair_id": "u022652-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022652-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "bcd1116025d742e1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022685-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena has a patch cycle of 36. Talc is notarized. Galena is not benchmarked. Galena has a test yield of 94. Galena has a defect tally of 39. Talc has no feature toggle. Talc has a patch cycle of 27. Galena has a feature toggle. Galena is not merged.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is merged: then it has no security advisory. Policy II. Suppose that build is tagged: then it is documented. Policy III. Suppose that build has a defect tally higher than 88: then it is not compiled. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a defect tally no lower than 16: then it is not experimental. Policy V. Suppose that build has a feature toggle: then it is not tagged. Policy VI. Suppose that build has a security advisory: then it is not documented. Policy VII. Suppose that build has a defect tally no lower than 39: then it has a security advisory. Policy VIII. Suppose that build has a test yield no higher than 24: then it is not documented. Policy IX. Suppose that build is notarized: then it is experimental. Policy X. Suppose that build has a security advisory: then it is backported. Policy XI. Suppose that build has a feature toggle: then it is tagged. Policy XII. Suppose that build has a patch cycle no lower than 33: then it is compiled. In a clash, Policy XII beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy XI beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy II. Question: Which choice is right for Galena?", "options": ["is backported", "is documented"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is backported", "unit_id": "u022685", "pair_id": "u022685-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022685-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ad8adfdf888e039f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a7"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022685-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena has a patch cycle of 36. Talc is notarized. Galena is not benchmarked. Galena has a test yield of 94. Galena has a defect tally of 39. Talc has no feature toggle. Talc has a patch cycle of 27. Galena has a feature toggle. Galena is not merged.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is merged: then it has no security advisory. Policy II. Suppose that build is tagged: then it is documented. Policy III. Suppose that build has a defect tally higher than 88: then it is not compiled. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a defect tally no lower than 16: then it is not experimental. Policy V. Suppose that build has a feature toggle: then it is not tagged. Policy VI. Suppose that build has a security advisory: then it is not documented. Policy VII. Suppose that build has a defect tally no lower than 78: then it has a security advisory. Policy VIII. Suppose that build has a test yield no higher than 24: then it is not documented. Policy IX. Suppose that build is notarized: then it is experimental. Policy X. Suppose that build has a security advisory: then it is backported. Policy XI. Suppose that build has a feature toggle: then it is tagged. Policy XII. Suppose that build has a patch cycle no lower than 33: then it is compiled. In a clash, Policy XII beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy XI beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy II. Question: Which choice is right for Galena?", "options": ["is backported", "is documented"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is documented", "unit_id": "u022685", "pair_id": "u022685-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022685-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a26cfac663fa0c96", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a7"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022685-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena has a patch cycle of 36. Talc is notarized. Galena is not benchmarked. Galena has a test yield of 94. Galena has a defect tally of 39. Talc has no feature toggle. Talc has a patch cycle of 27. Galena has a feature toggle. Galena is not merged.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is merged, it then has no security advisory. #2 Each time a build is tagged, it then is documented. #3 Each time a build has a defect tally greater than 88, it then is not compiled. #4 Each time a build has a defect tally of 16 or above, it then is not experimental. #5 Each time a build has a feature toggle, it then is not tagged. #6 Each time a build has a security advisory, it then is not documented. #7 Each time a build has a defect tally of 39 or above, it then has a security advisory. #8 Each time a build has a test yield of 24 or below, it then is not documented. #9 Each time a build is notarized, it then is experimental. #10 Each time a build has a security advisory, it then is backported. #11 Each time a build has a feature toggle, it then is tagged. #12 Each time a build has a patch cycle of 33 or above, it then is compiled. #3 yields to #12. #1 yields to #7. #2 yields to #6. #9 yields to #4. #5 yields to #11. #2 yields to #8. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Galena?", "options": ["is backported", "is documented"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is backported", "unit_id": "u022685", "pair_id": "u022685-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022685-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ad8adfdf888e039f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a7"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022685-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena has a patch cycle of 36. Talc is notarized. Galena is not benchmarked. Galena has a test yield of 94. Galena has a defect tally of 39. Talc has no feature toggle. Talc has a patch cycle of 27. Galena has a feature toggle. Galena is not merged.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is merged, it then has no security advisory. #2 Each time a build is tagged, it then is documented. #3 Each time a build has a defect tally greater than 88, it then is not compiled. #4 Each time a build has a defect tally of 16 or above, it then is not experimental. #5 Each time a build has a feature toggle, it then is not tagged. #6 Each time a build has a security advisory, it then is not documented. #7 Each time a build has a defect tally of 78 or above, it then has a security advisory. #8 Each time a build has a test yield of 24 or below, it then is not documented. #9 Each time a build is notarized, it then is experimental. #10 Each time a build has a security advisory, it then is backported. #11 Each time a build has a feature toggle, it then is tagged. #12 Each time a build has a patch cycle of 33 or above, it then is compiled. #3 yields to #12. #1 yields to #7. #2 yields to #6. #9 yields to #4. #5 yields to #11. #2 yields to #8. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Galena?", "options": ["is backported", "is documented"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is documented", "unit_id": "u022685", "pair_id": "u022685-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022685-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a26cfac663fa0c96", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a7"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022692-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel is discharged. Wendel is ambulatory. Wendel has a pulse rate of 97. Wendel is not postoperative. Zora is postoperative.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is not discharged, thus it is symptomatic. Provision 2: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it has a chaperone. Provision 3: when the patient here is discharged, thus it is admitted. Provision 4: when the patient here is referred, thus it has a pacemaker. Provision 5: when the patient here has a pulse rate beneath 22, thus it is fasting. Provision 6: when the patient here is not pregnant, thus it is sedated. Provision 7: when the patient here is not ambulatory, thus it is diabetic. Provision 8: when the patient here is not postoperative, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 9: when the patient here is not referred, thus it is asthmatic. Question: Which one describes Wendel?", "options": ["has a pacemaker", "is sedated", "is asthmatic", "has a chaperone", "is fasting", "is admitted", "is symptomatic"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is admitted", "unit_id": "u022692", "pair_id": "u022692-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022692-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "832688fc630102cd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a11", "a13", "a1", "a12", "a8", "a0"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u022692-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel is not discharged. Wendel is ambulatory. Wendel has a pulse rate of 97. Wendel is not postoperative. Zora is postoperative.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is not discharged, thus it is symptomatic. Provision 2: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it has a chaperone. Provision 3: when the patient here is discharged, thus it is admitted. Provision 4: when the patient here is referred, thus it has a pacemaker. Provision 5: when the patient here has a pulse rate beneath 22, thus it is fasting. Provision 6: when the patient here is not pregnant, thus it is sedated. Provision 7: when the patient here is not ambulatory, thus it is diabetic. Provision 8: when the patient here is not postoperative, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 9: when the patient here is not referred, thus it is asthmatic. Question: Which one describes Wendel?", "options": ["has a pacemaker", "is sedated", "is asthmatic", "has a chaperone", "is fasting", "is admitted", "is symptomatic"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is symptomatic", "unit_id": "u022692", "pair_id": "u022692-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022692-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "9ec8f595794b36e9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a11", "a13", "a1", "a12", "a8", "a0"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u022711-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek has no beneficiary. Zdenek has a premium band of 79. Zdenek is bundled. Zdenek is not reimbursed. Zdenek is not litigated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also is uninsurable. Clause 2: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is lapsed. Clause 3: once any policyholder has a premium band over 78, it also has no premium discount. Clause 4: once any policyholder is not bundled, it also has a dashcam. Clause 5: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is retired. Clause 6: once any policyholder is litigated, it also is covered. Clause 7: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also has no flood coverage. Clause 8: once any policyholder is covered, it also has roadside assistance. Clause 9: once any policyholder is not litigated, it also is a smoker. Clause 7 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is not reimbursed. Clause 3 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is not litigated. Clause 5 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a beneficiary. Question: Which of these is true of Zdenek?", "options": ["is uninsurable", "is retired"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u022711", "pair_id": "u022711-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022711-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c08ec660d7e7298a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a6"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022711-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zdenek has no beneficiary. Zdenek has a premium band of 79. Zdenek is not bundled. Zdenek is not reimbursed. Zdenek is not litigated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also is uninsurable. Clause 2: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is lapsed. Clause 3: once any policyholder has a premium band over 78, it also has no premium discount. Clause 4: once any policyholder is not bundled, it also has a dashcam. Clause 5: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is retired. Clause 6: once any policyholder is litigated, it also is covered. Clause 7: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also has no flood coverage. Clause 8: once any policyholder is covered, it also has roadside assistance. Clause 9: once any policyholder is not litigated, it also is a smoker. Clause 7 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is not reimbursed. Clause 3 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is not litigated. Clause 5 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a beneficiary. Question: Which of these is true of Zdenek?", "options": ["is uninsurable", "is retired"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u022711", "pair_id": "u022711-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022711-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ed309979baf6f54b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a6"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022713-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is a smoker. Yara has a payout ceiling of 63. Una is not bundled. Yara is not indemnified. Bruno is bundled. Yara is a smoker. Una is not a smoker. Viggo is a smoker. Yara is bundled. Bruno is not indemnified. Viggo has a claim frequency of 10. Viggo has a payout ceiling of 42. Una is indemnified. Una has a payout ceiling of 20. Bruno has a claim frequency of 14.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it has a deductible waiver. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is litigated: then it is not grandfathered. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a claim frequency no higher than 48: then it is disputed. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it is a claimant. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is litigated: then it is grandfathered. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is disputed: then it is litigated. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder is disputed: then it is reinstated. Policy VI is waived if that policyholder is a smoker. Policy IV is waived if that policyholder is a smoker. Policy V is waived if that policyholder is bundled. Policy II is waived if that policyholder has a payout ceiling higher than 72. Policy V is waived if that policyholder has a payout ceiling no higher than 72. Policy VII is waived if that policyholder is indemnified. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is bundled. Question: Is it so that Una is grandfathered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022713", "pair_id": "u022713-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/11", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022713-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e0ba32c140842e98", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022713-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is a smoker. Yara has a payout ceiling of 63. Una is not bundled. Yara is not indemnified. Bruno is bundled. Yara is a smoker. Una is not a smoker. Viggo is a smoker. Yara is bundled. Bruno is not indemnified. Viggo has a claim frequency of 10. Una has a claim frequency of 2. Viggo has a payout ceiling of 42. Una is indemnified. Una has a payout ceiling of 20. Bruno has a claim frequency of 14.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it has a deductible waiver. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is litigated: then it is not grandfathered. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a claim frequency no higher than 48: then it is disputed. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it is a claimant. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is litigated: then it is grandfathered. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is disputed: then it is litigated. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder is disputed: then it is reinstated. Policy VI is waived if that policyholder is a smoker. Policy IV is waived if that policyholder is a smoker. Policy V is waived if that policyholder is bundled. Policy II is waived if that policyholder has a payout ceiling higher than 72. Policy V is waived if that policyholder has a payout ceiling no higher than 72. Policy VII is waived if that policyholder is indemnified. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is bundled. Question: Is it so that Una is grandfathered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022713", "pair_id": "u022713-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/11", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022713-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "df8e26402a3ac365", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u022722-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile has a courier. Odile is labeled. Odile is not misrouted. Odile is not rerouted. Odile is undeliverable. Odile is oversized. Odile is registered.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is perishable provided that it is refrigerated as well as is stamped. Section 2: a parcel is prepaid provided that it is oversized. Section 3: a parcel is not damaged provided that it is misrouted as well as is registered. Section 4: a parcel is not refrigerated provided that it is rerouted as well as is hazardous as well as has a courier. Section 5: a parcel is refrigerated provided that it is not rerouted as well as is undeliverable as well as is labeled. Question: Odile is refrigerated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022722", "pair_id": "u022722-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022722-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "767e5284f261eedb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u022722-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile has a courier. Odile is labeled. Odile is not misrouted. Odile is not rerouted. Odile is undeliverable. Odile is oversized. Odile is registered.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is perishable provided that it is refrigerated as well as is stamped. Section 2: a parcel is prepaid provided that it is oversized. Section 3: a parcel is not damaged provided that it is misrouted as well as is registered. Section 4: a parcel is not refrigerated provided that it is rerouted as well as is hazardous as well as has a courier. Section 5: a parcel is refrigerated provided that it is rerouted as well as is undeliverable as well as is labeled. Question: Odile is refrigerated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022722", "pair_id": "u022722-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022722-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "2aa2c4cf0b46dc5f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u022722-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile has a courier. Odile is labeled. Odile is not misrouted. Odile is not rerouted. Odile is undeliverable. Odile is oversized. Odile is registered.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated plus is stamped: then it is perishable. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is prepaid. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is misrouted plus is registered: then it is not damaged. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is rerouted plus is hazardous plus has a courier: then it is not refrigerated. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is not rerouted plus is undeliverable plus is labeled: then it is refrigerated. Question: Is it so that Odile is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022722", "pair_id": "u022722-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022722-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "767e5284f261eedb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u022722-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile has a courier. Odile is labeled. Odile is not misrouted. Odile is not rerouted. Odile is undeliverable. Odile is oversized. Odile is registered.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated plus is stamped: then it is perishable. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is prepaid. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is misrouted plus is registered: then it is not damaged. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is rerouted plus is hazardous plus has a courier: then it is not refrigerated. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is rerouted plus is undeliverable plus is labeled: then it is refrigerated. Question: Is it so that Odile is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022722", "pair_id": "u022722-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022722-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "2aa2c4cf0b46dc5f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u022722-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile has a courier. Odile is labeled. Odile is not misrouted. Odile is not rerouted. Odile is undeliverable. Odile is oversized. Odile is registered.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is refrigerated and additionally is stamped, it then is perishable. #2 Each time a parcel is oversized, it then is prepaid. #3 Each time a parcel is misrouted and additionally is registered, it then is not damaged. #4 Each time a parcel is rerouted and additionally is hazardous and additionally has a courier, it then is not refrigerated. #5 Each time a parcel is not rerouted and additionally is undeliverable and additionally is labeled, it then is refrigerated. Question: Do the terms above show that Odile is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022722", "pair_id": "u022722-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022722-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "767e5284f261eedb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u022722-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile has a courier. Odile is labeled. Odile is not misrouted. Odile is not rerouted. Odile is undeliverable. Odile is oversized. Odile is registered.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is refrigerated and additionally is stamped, it then is perishable. #2 Each time a parcel is oversized, it then is prepaid. #3 Each time a parcel is misrouted and additionally is registered, it then is not damaged. #4 Each time a parcel is rerouted and additionally is hazardous and additionally has a courier, it then is not refrigerated. #5 Each time a parcel is rerouted and additionally is undeliverable and additionally is labeled, it then is refrigerated. Question: Do the terms above show that Odile is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022722", "pair_id": "u022722-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022722-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "2aa2c4cf0b46dc5f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u022802-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is not translational. Nashira is renewed. Nashira is theoretical. Nashira is cofunded. Nashira has a postdoc.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is resubmitted while is theoretical, thus it is multicenter. Provision 2: when the proposal here is a pilot study while is renewed while is theoretical, thus it has no steering committee. Provision 3: when the proposal here is a pilot study, thus it is shortlisted. Provision 4: when the proposal here is a pilot study while is translational while has a postdoc, thus it has a steering committee. Provision 5: when the proposal here is cofunded while is theoretical, thus it is embargoed. Provision 6: when the proposal here has a postdoc while is theoretical, thus it is not embargoed. Provision 1 has no effect when the proposal here is theoretical. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here is translational. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Would it be right to say that Nashira has a steering committee?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022802", "pair_id": "u022802-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022802-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "364039d1b1df1c13", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022802-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is not translational. Nashira is renewed. Nashira is theoretical. Nashira is cofunded. Nashira has a postdoc.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is resubmitted while is theoretical, thus it is multicenter. Provision 2: when the proposal here is a pilot study while is renewed while is theoretical, thus it has no steering committee. Provision 3: when the proposal here is a pilot study, thus it is shortlisted. Provision 4: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is a pilot study. Provision 5: when the proposal here is a pilot study while is translational while has a postdoc, thus it has a steering committee. Provision 6: when the proposal here is cofunded while is theoretical, thus it is embargoed. Provision 7: when the proposal here has a postdoc while is theoretical, thus it is not embargoed. Provision 1 has no effect when the proposal here is theoretical. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here is translational. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Would it be right to say that Nashira has a steering committee?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022802", "pair_id": "u022802-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022802-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3791a3f7f6d7625e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022802-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is not translational. Nashira is renewed. Nashira is theoretical. Nashira is cofunded. Nashira has a postdoc.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is resubmitted and likewise is theoretical, so it is multicenter. No. 2 While the given proposal is a pilot study and likewise is renewed and likewise is theoretical, so it has no steering committee. No. 3 While the given proposal is a pilot study, so it is shortlisted. No. 4 While the given proposal is a pilot study and likewise is translational and likewise has a postdoc, so it has a steering committee. No. 5 While the given proposal is cofunded and likewise is theoretical, so it is embargoed. No. 6 While the given proposal has a postdoc and likewise is theoretical, so it is not embargoed. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal is theoretical. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given proposal is translational. No. 4 wins over No. 2. No. 5 wins over No. 6. Question: Is the claim \"Nashira has a steering committee\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022802", "pair_id": "u022802-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022802-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "364039d1b1df1c13", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022802-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is not translational. Nashira is renewed. Nashira is theoretical. Nashira is cofunded. Nashira has a postdoc.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is resubmitted and likewise is theoretical, so it is multicenter. No. 2 While the given proposal is a pilot study and likewise is renewed and likewise is theoretical, so it has no steering committee. No. 3 While the given proposal is a pilot study, so it is shortlisted. No. 4 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is a pilot study. No. 5 While the given proposal is a pilot study and likewise is translational and likewise has a postdoc, so it has a steering committee. No. 6 While the given proposal is cofunded and likewise is theoretical, so it is embargoed. No. 7 While the given proposal has a postdoc and likewise is theoretical, so it is not embargoed. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal is theoretical. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given proposal is translational. No. 5 wins over No. 2. No. 6 wins over No. 7. Question: Is the claim \"Nashira has a steering committee\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022802", "pair_id": "u022802-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022802-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3791a3f7f6d7625e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022806-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra has no firewall. Tundra is stateless. Tundra has no firewall. Tundra is cached. Sierra is not throttled. Tundra is not encrypted. Orrery has a GPU. Orrery is patched. Sierra is encrypted. Orrery is stateless. Tundra has no GPU. Tundra is not autoscaled. Orrery has no failover node. Tundra is not patched. Tundra is not backed up. Tundra is not sharded.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is sharded, it also has a dedicated host. Clause 2: once any workload is sharded, it also is not idle. Clause 3: once any workload has a firewall, it also is not mirrored. Clause 4: once any workload is backed up, it also is idle. Clause 5: once any workload has a firewall, it also is monitored. Clause 6: once any workload is patched, it also is mirrored. Clause 7: once any workload is provisioned, it also is not virtualized. Clause 8: once any workload has a failover node, it also is not deprecated. Clause 9: once any workload is autoscaled, it also is virtualized. Clause 10: once any workload is encrypted, it also has no snapshot. Clause 11: once any workload is cached, it also is not virtualized. Clause 12: once any workload has a GPU, it also is not sandboxed. Clause 13: once any workload is stateless, it also has a snapshot. Clause 14: once any workload is throttled, it also is not replicated. Clause 15: once any workload is provisioned, it also is isolated. Clause 16: once any workload is encrypted, it also is sandboxed. Clause 2 overrides Clause 4. Clause 3 overrides Clause 6. Clause 9 overrides Clause 11. Clause 7 overrides Clause 9. Clause 10 overrides Clause 13. Clause 16 overrides Clause 12. Question: Which of these is true of Tundra?", "options": ["is monitored", "is sandboxed", "has a dedicated host", "is mirrored", "has a snapshot", "is isolated", "is virtualized", "is idle"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a snapshot", "unit_id": "u022806", "pair_id": "u022806-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022806-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "75dfa39c89c61b21", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a13", "a3", "a0", "a5", "a18", "a15", "a20"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022806-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra has no firewall. Tundra is stateless. Tundra has no firewall. Tundra is cached. Sierra is not throttled. Tundra is not encrypted. Orrery has a GPU. Orrery is patched. Sierra is encrypted. Orrery is stateless. Tundra has a GPU. Tundra is not autoscaled. Orrery has no failover node. Tundra is not patched. Tundra is not backed up. Tundra is not sharded.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is sharded, it also has a dedicated host. Clause 2: once any workload is sharded, it also is not idle. Clause 3: once any workload has a firewall, it also is not mirrored. Clause 4: once any workload is backed up, it also is idle. Clause 5: once any workload has a firewall, it also is monitored. Clause 6: once any workload is patched, it also is mirrored. Clause 7: once any workload is provisioned, it also is not virtualized. Clause 8: once any workload has a failover node, it also is not deprecated. Clause 9: once any workload is autoscaled, it also is virtualized. Clause 10: once any workload is encrypted, it also has no snapshot. Clause 11: once any workload is cached, it also is not virtualized. Clause 12: once any workload has a GPU, it also is not sandboxed. Clause 13: once any workload is stateless, it also has a snapshot. Clause 14: once any workload is throttled, it also is not replicated. Clause 15: once any workload is provisioned, it also is isolated. Clause 16: once any workload is encrypted, it also is sandboxed. Clause 2 overrides Clause 4. Clause 3 overrides Clause 6. Clause 9 overrides Clause 11. Clause 7 overrides Clause 9. Clause 10 overrides Clause 13. Clause 16 overrides Clause 12. Question: Which of these is true of Tundra?", "options": ["is monitored", "is sandboxed", "has a dedicated host", "is mirrored", "has a snapshot", "is isolated", "is virtualized", "is idle"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a snapshot", "unit_id": "u022806", "pair_id": "u022806-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022806-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "0c86a635d199123e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a13", "a3", "a0", "a5", "a18", "a15", "a20"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022806-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra has no firewall. Tundra is stateless. Tundra has no firewall. Tundra is cached. Sierra is not throttled. Tundra is not encrypted. Orrery has a GPU. Orrery is patched. Sierra is encrypted. Orrery is stateless. Tundra has no GPU. Tundra is not autoscaled. Orrery has no failover node. Tundra is not patched. Tundra is not backed up. Tundra is not sharded.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is sharded, that workload has a dedicated host. Item B. When the workload is sharded, that workload is not idle. Item C. When the workload has a firewall, that workload is not mirrored. Item D. When the workload is backed up, that workload is idle. Item E. When the workload has a firewall, that workload is monitored. Item F. When the workload is patched, that workload is mirrored. Item G. When the workload is provisioned, that workload is not virtualized. Item H. When the workload has a failover node, that workload is not deprecated. Item I. When the workload is autoscaled, that workload is virtualized. Item J. When the workload is encrypted, that workload has no snapshot. Item K. When the workload is cached, that workload is not virtualized. Item L. When the workload has a GPU, that workload is not sandboxed. Item M. When the workload is stateless, that workload has a snapshot. Item N. When the workload is throttled, that workload is not replicated. Item O. When the workload is provisioned, that workload is isolated. Item P. When the workload is encrypted, that workload is sandboxed. Item B outranks Item D. Item C outranks Item F. Item I outranks Item K. Item G outranks Item I. Item J outranks Item M. Item P outranks Item L. Question: What applies to Tundra?", "options": ["is monitored", "is sandboxed", "has a dedicated host", "is mirrored", "has a snapshot", "is isolated", "is virtualized", "is idle"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a snapshot", "unit_id": "u022806", "pair_id": "u022806-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022806-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "75dfa39c89c61b21", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a13", "a3", "a0", "a5", "a18", "a15", "a20"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022806-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra has no firewall. Tundra is stateless. Tundra has no firewall. Tundra is cached. Sierra is not throttled. Tundra is not encrypted. Orrery has a GPU. Orrery is patched. Sierra is encrypted. Orrery is stateless. Tundra has a GPU. Tundra is not autoscaled. Orrery has no failover node. Tundra is not patched. Tundra is not backed up. Tundra is not sharded.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is sharded, that workload has a dedicated host. Item B. When the workload is sharded, that workload is not idle. Item C. When the workload has a firewall, that workload is not mirrored. Item D. When the workload is backed up, that workload is idle. Item E. When the workload has a firewall, that workload is monitored. Item F. When the workload is patched, that workload is mirrored. Item G. When the workload is provisioned, that workload is not virtualized. Item H. When the workload has a failover node, that workload is not deprecated. Item I. When the workload is autoscaled, that workload is virtualized. Item J. When the workload is encrypted, that workload has no snapshot. Item K. When the workload is cached, that workload is not virtualized. Item L. When the workload has a GPU, that workload is not sandboxed. Item M. When the workload is stateless, that workload has a snapshot. Item N. When the workload is throttled, that workload is not replicated. Item O. When the workload is provisioned, that workload is isolated. Item P. When the workload is encrypted, that workload is sandboxed. Item B outranks Item D. Item C outranks Item F. Item I outranks Item K. Item G outranks Item I. Item J outranks Item M. Item P outranks Item L. Question: What applies to Tundra?", "options": ["is monitored", "is sandboxed", "has a dedicated host", "is mirrored", "has a snapshot", "is isolated", "is virtualized", "is idle"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a snapshot", "unit_id": "u022806", "pair_id": "u022806-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022806-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "0c86a635d199123e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a13", "a3", "a0", "a5", "a18", "a15", "a20"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022817-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri has no flood coverage. Dmitri has a payout ceiling of 24. Dmitri has a dashcam. Bruno has no flood coverage. Dmitri is reinstated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is retired provided that it has a dashcam as well as has flood coverage. Section 2: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it has a dashcam as well as is reinstated as well as has no flood coverage. Section 3: a policyholder has no premium discount provided that it is not covered. Section 4: a policyholder is inspected provided that it has flood coverage. Section 5: a policyholder is grandfathered provided that it has a payout ceiling lower than 31 as well as is not reinstated. Question: Which statement fits Dmitri?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "is grandfathered", "is retired"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a deductible waiver", "unit_id": "u022817", "pair_id": "u022817-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022817-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a1962787237d695d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a9", "a5"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022817-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri has no flood coverage. Dmitri has a payout ceiling of 24. Dmitri has a dashcam. Bruno has no flood coverage. Dmitri is not reinstated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is retired provided that it has a dashcam as well as has flood coverage. Section 2: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it has a dashcam as well as is reinstated as well as has no flood coverage. Section 3: a policyholder has no premium discount provided that it is not covered. Section 4: a policyholder is inspected provided that it has flood coverage. Section 5: a policyholder is grandfathered provided that it has a payout ceiling lower than 31 as well as is not reinstated. Question: Which statement fits Dmitri?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "is grandfathered", "is retired"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is grandfathered", "unit_id": "u022817", "pair_id": "u022817-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022817-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "06877cafc799213f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a9", "a5"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022817-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri has no flood coverage. Dmitri has a payout ceiling of 24. Dmitri has a dashcam. Bruno has no flood coverage. Dmitri is reinstated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam plus has flood coverage: then it is retired. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam plus is reinstated plus has no flood coverage: then it has a deductible waiver. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is not covered: then it has no premium discount. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has flood coverage: then it is inspected. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has a payout ceiling smaller than 31 plus is not reinstated: then it is grandfathered. Question: Which choice is right for Dmitri?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "is grandfathered", "is retired"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a deductible waiver", "unit_id": "u022817", "pair_id": "u022817-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022817-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a1962787237d695d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a9", "a5"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022817-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri has no flood coverage. Dmitri has a payout ceiling of 24. Dmitri has a dashcam. Bruno has no flood coverage. Dmitri is not reinstated.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam plus has flood coverage: then it is retired. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam plus is reinstated plus has no flood coverage: then it has a deductible waiver. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is not covered: then it has no premium discount. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has flood coverage: then it is inspected. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has a payout ceiling smaller than 31 plus is not reinstated: then it is grandfathered. Question: Which choice is right for Dmitri?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "is grandfathered", "is retired"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is grandfathered", "unit_id": "u022817", "pair_id": "u022817-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022817-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "06877cafc799213f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a9", "a5"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022817-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri has no flood coverage. Dmitri has a payout ceiling of 24. Dmitri has a dashcam. Bruno has no flood coverage. Dmitri is reinstated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has a dashcam and additionally has flood coverage, it then is retired. #2 Each time a policyholder has a dashcam and additionally is reinstated and additionally has no flood coverage, it then has a deductible waiver. #3 Each time a policyholder is not covered, it then has no premium discount. #4 Each time a policyholder has flood coverage, it then is inspected. #5 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling less than 31 and additionally is not reinstated, it then is grandfathered. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Dmitri?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "is grandfathered", "is retired"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a deductible waiver", "unit_id": "u022817", "pair_id": "u022817-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022817-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a1962787237d695d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a9", "a5"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022817-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri has no flood coverage. Dmitri has a payout ceiling of 24. Dmitri has a dashcam. Bruno has no flood coverage. Dmitri is not reinstated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has a dashcam and additionally has flood coverage, it then is retired. #2 Each time a policyholder has a dashcam and additionally is reinstated and additionally has no flood coverage, it then has a deductible waiver. #3 Each time a policyholder is not covered, it then has no premium discount. #4 Each time a policyholder has flood coverage, it then is inspected. #5 Each time a policyholder has a payout ceiling less than 31 and additionally is not reinstated, it then is grandfathered. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Dmitri?", "options": ["has a deductible waiver", "is grandfathered", "is retired"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is grandfathered", "unit_id": "u022817", "pair_id": "u022817-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022817-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "06877cafc799213f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a9", "a5"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022908-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is not palletized. Rasmus is palletized. Kaveh has a postal zone of 34. Jory is consolidated. Odile is not consolidated. Kaveh is not palletized. Jory has a postal zone of 84. Kaveh is consolidated.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is perishable, then it is fragile. (2) If a parcel is labeled, then it is perishable. (3) If a parcel has a barcode, then it is prepaid. (4) If a parcel has a postal zone above 34, then it has a barcode. (5) If a parcel is oversized, then it is stamped. (6) If a parcel has a postal zone of at most 34, then it is labeled. (7) If a parcel has a postal zone of at most 74, then it is damaged. (8) If a parcel is consolidated, then it has no waybill. (9) If a parcel is stamped, then it is weighed. (10) If a parcel is prepaid, then it is scanned. (11) If a parcel is palletized, then it is oversized. Question: Which option holds for Kaveh?", "options": ["is fragile", "is weighed", "is scanned"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is fragile", "unit_id": "u022908", "pair_id": "u022908-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022908-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "41c5cb342459d67c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a8", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022908-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is not palletized. Rasmus is palletized. Kaveh has a postal zone of 83. Jory is consolidated. Odile is not consolidated. Kaveh is not palletized. Jory has a postal zone of 84. Kaveh is consolidated.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is perishable, then it is fragile. (2) If a parcel is labeled, then it is perishable. (3) If a parcel has a barcode, then it is prepaid. (4) If a parcel has a postal zone above 34, then it has a barcode. (5) If a parcel is oversized, then it is stamped. (6) If a parcel has a postal zone of at most 34, then it is labeled. (7) If a parcel has a postal zone of at most 74, then it is damaged. (8) If a parcel is consolidated, then it has no waybill. (9) If a parcel is stamped, then it is weighed. (10) If a parcel is prepaid, then it is scanned. (11) If a parcel is palletized, then it is oversized. Question: Which option holds for Kaveh?", "options": ["is fragile", "is weighed", "is scanned"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is scanned", "unit_id": "u022908", "pair_id": "u022908-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022908-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "6689129d448c2cd2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a8", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022908-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is not palletized. Rasmus is palletized. Kaveh has a postal zone of 34. Jory is consolidated. Odile is not consolidated. Kaveh is not palletized. Jory has a postal zone of 84. Kaveh is consolidated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is perishable, it also is fragile. Clause 2: once any parcel is labeled, it also is perishable. Clause 3: once any parcel has a barcode, it also is prepaid. Clause 4: once any parcel has a postal zone over 34, it also has a barcode. Clause 5: once any parcel is oversized, it also is stamped. Clause 6: once any parcel has a postal zone of 34 or less, it also is labeled. Clause 7: once any parcel has a postal zone of 74 or less, it also is damaged. Clause 8: once any parcel is consolidated, it also has no waybill. Clause 9: once any parcel is stamped, it also is weighed. Clause 10: once any parcel is prepaid, it also is scanned. Clause 11: once any parcel is palletized, it also is oversized. Question: Which of these is true of Kaveh?", "options": ["is fragile", "is weighed", "is scanned"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is fragile", "unit_id": "u022908", "pair_id": "u022908-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022908-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "41c5cb342459d67c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a8", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022908-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is not palletized. Rasmus is palletized. Kaveh has a postal zone of 83. Jory is consolidated. Odile is not consolidated. Kaveh is not palletized. Jory has a postal zone of 84. Kaveh is consolidated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is perishable, it also is fragile. Clause 2: once any parcel is labeled, it also is perishable. Clause 3: once any parcel has a barcode, it also is prepaid. Clause 4: once any parcel has a postal zone over 34, it also has a barcode. Clause 5: once any parcel is oversized, it also is stamped. Clause 6: once any parcel has a postal zone of 34 or less, it also is labeled. Clause 7: once any parcel has a postal zone of 74 or less, it also is damaged. Clause 8: once any parcel is consolidated, it also has no waybill. Clause 9: once any parcel is stamped, it also is weighed. Clause 10: once any parcel is prepaid, it also is scanned. Clause 11: once any parcel is palletized, it also is oversized. Question: Which of these is true of Kaveh?", "options": ["is fragile", "is weighed", "is scanned"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is scanned", "unit_id": "u022908", "pair_id": "u022908-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022908-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "6689129d448c2cd2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a8", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022908-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is not palletized. Rasmus is palletized. Kaveh has a postal zone of 34. Jory is consolidated. Odile is not consolidated. Kaveh is not palletized. Jory has a postal zone of 84. Kaveh is consolidated.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is perishable, that parcel is fragile. Item B. When the parcel is labeled, that parcel is perishable. Item C. When the parcel has a barcode, that parcel is prepaid. Item D. When the parcel has a postal zone of more than 34, that parcel has a barcode. Item E. When the parcel is oversized, that parcel is stamped. Item F. When the parcel has a postal zone of no more than 34, that parcel is labeled. Item G. When the parcel has a postal zone of no more than 74, that parcel is damaged. Item H. When the parcel is consolidated, that parcel has no waybill. Item I. When the parcel is stamped, that parcel is weighed. Item J. When the parcel is prepaid, that parcel is scanned. Item K. When the parcel is palletized, that parcel is oversized. Question: What applies to Kaveh?", "options": ["is fragile", "is weighed", "is scanned"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is fragile", "unit_id": "u022908", "pair_id": "u022908-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022908-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "41c5cb342459d67c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a8", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022908-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is not palletized. Rasmus is palletized. Kaveh has a postal zone of 83. Jory is consolidated. Odile is not consolidated. Kaveh is not palletized. Jory has a postal zone of 84. Kaveh is consolidated.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is perishable, that parcel is fragile. Item B. When the parcel is labeled, that parcel is perishable. Item C. When the parcel has a barcode, that parcel is prepaid. Item D. When the parcel has a postal zone of more than 34, that parcel has a barcode. Item E. When the parcel is oversized, that parcel is stamped. Item F. When the parcel has a postal zone of no more than 34, that parcel is labeled. Item G. When the parcel has a postal zone of no more than 74, that parcel is damaged. Item H. When the parcel is consolidated, that parcel has no waybill. Item I. When the parcel is stamped, that parcel is weighed. Item J. When the parcel is prepaid, that parcel is scanned. Item K. When the parcel is palletized, that parcel is oversized. Question: What applies to Kaveh?", "options": ["is fragile", "is weighed", "is scanned"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is scanned", "unit_id": "u022908", "pair_id": "u022908-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022908-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "6689129d448c2cd2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a8", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u022937-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads has a notice period of 36. Petra is headhunted. Mads is a graduate. Olek has a notice period of 44. Mads is headhunted. Ivo is headhunted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a notice period smaller than 28: then it has no diploma. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it has a mentor. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a notice period no higher than 85: then it has a background screening. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has a notice period higher than 19: then it has no mentor. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is not headhunted: then it has a diploma. Policy I is waived if that candidate has a notice period no higher than 35. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy V. Question: Is it so that Mads is not a graduate?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022937", "pair_id": "u022937-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022937-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "11a550faecd390cd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022937-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads has a notice period of 36. Petra is headhunted. Mads is not a graduate. Olek has a notice period of 44. Mads is headhunted. Ivo is headhunted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a notice period smaller than 28: then it has no diploma. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it has a mentor. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a notice period no higher than 85: then it has a background screening. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has a notice period higher than 19: then it has no mentor. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is not headhunted: then it has a diploma. Policy I is waived if that candidate has a notice period no higher than 35. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy V. Question: Is it so that Mads is not a graduate?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022937", "pair_id": "u022937-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022937-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2478b91aea5a00a1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022952-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor is not fingerprinted. Noor is bonded.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is freelance provided that it is bonded. Section 2: a candidate is eligible provided that it is not bonded. Section 3: a candidate has a visa provided that it is not fingerprinted. Question: Which statement fits Noor?", "options": ["is eligible", "is freelance"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is freelance", "unit_id": "u022952", "pair_id": "u022952-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022952-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "08c44acabbfe8a55", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022952-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Noor is not fingerprinted. Noor is not bonded.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is freelance provided that it is bonded. Section 2: a candidate is eligible provided that it is not bonded. Section 3: a candidate has a visa provided that it is not fingerprinted. Question: Which statement fits Noor?", "options": ["is eligible", "is freelance"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is eligible", "unit_id": "u022952", "pair_id": "u022952-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022952-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "d662f30b3b0ce7ef", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022975-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is consolidated. Kaveh is not refrigerated. Kaveh has a waybill. Jory is not consolidated. Jory has a waybill. Ulla is not consolidated. Kaveh is not registered. Quentin is refrigerated. Quentin is not consolidated. Jory is not refrigerated. Quentin is not registered. Quentin has a waybill. Ulla is not refrigerated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it has a courier. Provision 2: when the parcel here is not registered, thus it is not rerouted. Provision 3: when the parcel here is not registered, thus it is rerouted. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here has no waybill. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is consolidated. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here has a waybill. Question: Would it be right to say that Quentin is not rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022975", "pair_id": "u022975-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022975-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f6d3e5fe9a761ed7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u022975-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh is consolidated. Kaveh is not refrigerated. Kaveh has a waybill. Jory is not consolidated. Jory has a waybill. Ulla is not consolidated. Kaveh is not registered. Quentin is refrigerated. Quentin is not consolidated. Jory is not refrigerated. Quentin is not registered. Quentin has no waybill. Ulla is not refrigerated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it has a courier. Provision 2: when the parcel here is not registered, thus it is not rerouted. Provision 3: when the parcel here is not registered, thus it is rerouted. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here has no waybill. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is consolidated. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here has a waybill. Question: Would it be right to say that Quentin is not rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022975", "pair_id": "u022975-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022975-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f68b8db228649a71", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u022977-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is containerized. Cobalt is monitored. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 30. Cobalt is not mirrored. Cobalt has a public endpoint. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 20.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload has a GPU, and has a CPU quota of less than 31, that workload is not throttled. Item B. When the workload has a GPU, and has a CPU quota of no less than 31, and is monitored, that workload is throttled. Item C. When the workload has a public endpoint, that workload is not virtualized. Item D. When the workload is mirrored, and is containerized, and is monitored, that workload is virtualized. Item E. When the workload has a replica count of less than 59, that workload has no GPU. Item F. When the workload has a memory allotment of no more than 62, and has a public endpoint, and is containerized, that workload has a GPU. Item F outranks Item E. Item A outranks Item B. Item C outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Cobalt is throttled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022977", "pair_id": "u022977-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022977-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "67d5af85e2f725aa", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u022977-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cobalt is containerized. Cobalt is monitored. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 11. Cobalt is not mirrored. Cobalt has a public endpoint. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 20.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload has a GPU, and has a CPU quota of less than 31, that workload is not throttled. Item B. When the workload has a GPU, and has a CPU quota of no less than 31, and is monitored, that workload is throttled. Item C. When the workload has a public endpoint, that workload is not virtualized. Item D. When the workload is mirrored, and is containerized, and is monitored, that workload is virtualized. Item E. When the workload has a replica count of less than 59, that workload has no GPU. Item F. When the workload has a memory allotment of no more than 62, and has a public endpoint, and is containerized, that workload has a GPU. Item F outranks Item E. Item A outranks Item B. Item C outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Cobalt is throttled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u022977", "pair_id": "u022977-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u022977-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ad0807c06f4b292e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u022994-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has no roadside assistance. Wanda is not covered. Agata is covered. Fabian is a smoker. Agata has no roadside assistance. Fabian is subrogated. Una is not covered. Agata is not subrogated. Fabian is covered. Wanda is subrogated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has no roadside assistance, thus it is not retired. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is not bundled. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is not a smoker, thus it is bundled. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is not a smoker, thus it is retired. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it has no adjuster. Provision 4 has no effect when the policyholder here is not reinstated. Provision 6 has no effect when the policyholder here is not covered. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here is covered. Provision 7 has no effect when the policyholder here is not subrogated. Provision 6 has no effect when the policyholder here is not reinstated. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here is reinstated. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Fabian is reimbursed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022994", "pair_id": "u022994-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022994-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a6b04a97be182e00", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022994-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has no roadside assistance. Fabian is reinstated. Wanda is not covered. Agata is covered. Fabian is a smoker. Agata has no roadside assistance. Fabian is subrogated. Una is not covered. Agata is not subrogated. Fabian is covered. Wanda is subrogated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has no roadside assistance, thus it is not retired. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is not bundled. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is not a smoker, thus it is bundled. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is not a smoker, thus it is retired. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it has no adjuster. Provision 4 has no effect when the policyholder here is not reinstated. Provision 6 has no effect when the policyholder here is not covered. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here is covered. Provision 7 has no effect when the policyholder here is not subrogated. Provision 6 has no effect when the policyholder here is not reinstated. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here is reinstated. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Fabian is reimbursed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022994", "pair_id": "u022994-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022994-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d50defa6a52a4949", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022994-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has no roadside assistance. Wanda is not covered. Agata is covered. Fabian is a smoker. Agata has no roadside assistance. Fabian is subrogated. Una is not covered. Agata is not subrogated. Fabian is covered. Wanda is subrogated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has no roadside assistance, so it is not retired. No. 2 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it is not bundled. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not a smoker, so it is bundled. No. 4 While the given policyholder is not a smoker, so it is retired. No. 5 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it is not reimbursed. No. 6 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it is reimbursed. No. 7 While the given policyholder is reimbursed, so it has no adjuster. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not reinstated. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not covered. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is covered. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not subrogated. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not reinstated. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is reinstated. No. 6 wins over No. 5. No. 1 wins over No. 4. No. 3 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Fabian is reimbursed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u022994", "pair_id": "u022994-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022994-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a6b04a97be182e00", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u022994-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has no roadside assistance. Fabian is reinstated. Wanda is not covered. Agata is covered. Fabian is a smoker. Agata has no roadside assistance. Fabian is subrogated. Una is not covered. Agata is not subrogated. Fabian is covered. Wanda is subrogated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has no roadside assistance, so it is not retired. No. 2 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it is not bundled. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not a smoker, so it is bundled. No. 4 While the given policyholder is not a smoker, so it is retired. No. 5 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it is not reimbursed. No. 6 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it is reimbursed. No. 7 While the given policyholder is reimbursed, so it has no adjuster. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not reinstated. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not covered. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is covered. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not subrogated. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not reinstated. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is reinstated. No. 6 wins over No. 5. No. 1 wins over No. 4. No. 3 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Fabian is reimbursed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u022994", "pair_id": "u022994-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u022994-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d50defa6a52a4949", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023038-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has seed funding. Electra is theoretical. Capella is resubmitted. Nashira has no patent filing. Electra is translational. Nashira is resubmitted. Capella is not translational. Electra has seed funding. Electra is not resubmitted. Electra is not exploratory. Electra has a patent filing.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is not shortlisted while is theoretical while is translational, thus it has no postdoc. Provision 2: when the proposal here has seed funding while has no patent filing, thus it is shortlisted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is not exploratory, thus it is not longitudinal. Provision 4: when the proposal here is not shortlisted while is not theoretical, thus it has a postdoc. Provision 5: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is not shortlisted. Provision 6: when the proposal here is not resubmitted, thus it is peer reviewed. Provision 7: when the proposal here has seed funding while is translational, thus it is embargoed. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Would it be right to say that Electra has no postdoc?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023038", "pair_id": "u023038-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023038-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f14a08568aafcf8a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u023038-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has seed funding. Electra is theoretical. Capella is resubmitted. Nashira has no patent filing. Electra is translational. Nashira is resubmitted. Capella is not translational. Electra has seed funding. Electra is not resubmitted. Electra is not exploratory. Electra has a patent filing.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is not shortlisted while is theoretical while is translational, thus it has no postdoc. Provision 2: when the proposal here has seed funding while has no patent filing, thus it is shortlisted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is exploratory, thus it is not longitudinal. Provision 4: when the proposal here is not shortlisted while is not theoretical, thus it has a postdoc. Provision 5: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is not shortlisted. Provision 6: when the proposal here is not resubmitted, thus it is peer reviewed. Provision 7: when the proposal here has seed funding while is translational, thus it is embargoed. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Would it be right to say that Electra has no postdoc?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023038", "pair_id": "u023038-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023038-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "362f14af7f5f44df", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u023038-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has seed funding. Electra is theoretical. Capella is resubmitted. Nashira has no patent filing. Electra is translational. Nashira is resubmitted. Capella is not translational. Electra has seed funding. Electra is not resubmitted. Electra is not exploratory. Electra has a patent filing.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is not shortlisted and likewise is theoretical and likewise is translational, so it has no postdoc. No. 2 While the given proposal has seed funding and likewise has no patent filing, so it is shortlisted. No. 3 While the given proposal is not exploratory, so it is not longitudinal. No. 4 While the given proposal is not shortlisted and likewise is not theoretical, so it has a postdoc. No. 5 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is not shortlisted. No. 6 While the given proposal is not resubmitted, so it is peer reviewed. No. 7 While the given proposal has seed funding and likewise is translational, so it is embargoed. No. 4 wins over No. 1. No. 2 wins over No. 5. Question: Is the claim \"Electra has no postdoc\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023038", "pair_id": "u023038-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023038-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f14a08568aafcf8a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u023038-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella has seed funding. Electra is theoretical. Capella is resubmitted. Nashira has no patent filing. Electra is translational. Nashira is resubmitted. Capella is not translational. Electra has seed funding. Electra is not resubmitted. Electra is not exploratory. Electra has a patent filing.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is not shortlisted and likewise is theoretical and likewise is translational, so it has no postdoc. No. 2 While the given proposal has seed funding and likewise has no patent filing, so it is shortlisted. No. 3 While the given proposal is exploratory, so it is not longitudinal. No. 4 While the given proposal is not shortlisted and likewise is not theoretical, so it has a postdoc. No. 5 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is not shortlisted. No. 6 While the given proposal is not resubmitted, so it is peer reviewed. No. 7 While the given proposal has seed funding and likewise is translational, so it is embargoed. No. 4 wins over No. 1. No. 2 wins over No. 5. Question: Is the claim \"Electra has no postdoc\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023038", "pair_id": "u023038-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023038-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "362f14af7f5f44df", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u023044-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma is not preregistered. Hadar has industry backing. Gemma has industry backing. Kochab has no industry backing.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has industry backing, so it is resubmitted. No. 2 While the given proposal is preregistered, so it is not peer reviewed. No. 3 While the given proposal is resubmitted, so it is a pilot study. No. 4 While the given proposal has a patent filing, so it has seed funding. No. 5 While the given proposal is endorsed, so it is not a pilot study. No. 6 While the given proposal is preregistered, so it is embargoed. No. 7 While the given proposal is preregistered, so it is endorsed. Question: Is the claim \"Hadar is a pilot study\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023044", "pair_id": "u023044-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023044-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "917e16e05f504f39", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023044-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma is not preregistered. Hadar has industry backing. Gemma has industry backing. Hadar has a patent filing. Kochab has no industry backing.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has industry backing, so it is resubmitted. No. 2 While the given proposal is preregistered, so it is not peer reviewed. No. 3 While the given proposal is resubmitted, so it is a pilot study. No. 4 While the given proposal has a patent filing, so it has seed funding. No. 5 While the given proposal is endorsed, so it is not a pilot study. No. 6 While the given proposal is preregistered, so it is embargoed. No. 7 While the given proposal is preregistered, so it is endorsed. Question: Is the claim \"Hadar is a pilot study\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023044", "pair_id": "u023044-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023044-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "136fd7309c8e629c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023056-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid has a lien. Ingrid is refinanced.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby is underwritten. Point B. If said borrower is a homeowner, it thereby is amortized. Point C. If said borrower has a lien, it thereby is foreclosed. Point D. If said borrower is solvent, it thereby is not overdrawn. Point E. If said borrower is bankrupt, it thereby is delinquent. Point F. If said borrower has a lien, it thereby is not creditworthy. Point G. If said borrower has no collateral, it thereby is bankrupt. Point H. If said borrower is underwritten, it thereby is not delinquent. Point I. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby has collateral. Question: Statement: Ingrid is delinquent. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023056", "pair_id": "u023056-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023056-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "9b9dea06a4c4a979", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023056-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid has a lien. Ingrid is refinanced.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is amortized, it thereby is underwritten. Point B. If said borrower is a homeowner, it thereby is amortized. Point C. If said borrower has a lien, it thereby is foreclosed. Point D. If said borrower is solvent, it thereby is not overdrawn. Point E. If said borrower is bankrupt, it thereby is delinquent. Point F. If said borrower has a lien, it thereby is not creditworthy. Point G. If said borrower has collateral, it thereby is bankrupt. Point H. If said borrower is underwritten, it thereby is not delinquent. Point I. If said borrower is refinanced, it thereby has collateral. Question: Statement: Ingrid is delinquent. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023056", "pair_id": "u023056-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023056-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "f08b34cdf96903d9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023072-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xaver is reinstated. Wanda is retired. Wanda is not reinstated. Xaver is bundled. Wanda is not reimbursed. Wanda has a beneficiary. Xaver is not retired. Xaver is not lapsed. Xaver is appraised. Wanda is bundled. Wanda has a dashcam. Xaver is not disputed. Xaver has a beneficiary. Xaver has a dashcam.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a rider and is retired, then it is indemnified. (2) If a policyholder has a rider and is not reimbursed, then it is uninsurable. (3) If a policyholder is bundled and has no beneficiary, then it has no adjuster. (4) If a policyholder is covered and is reinstated, then it has no flood coverage. (5) If a policyholder has a rider and is reinstated and is not retired, then it has a premium discount. (6) If a policyholder is bundled and has a dashcam and is not disputed, then it has a rider. (7) If a policyholder has a rider and is not retired and is not appraised, then it is a smoker. (8) If a policyholder has a rider and is appraised and is retired, then it is grandfathered. (9) If a policyholder is not lapsed, then it is a claimant. (10) If a policyholder has a rider and is not reinstated, then it is inspected. (11) If a policyholder has a rider and is reimbursed, then it has roadside assistance. Question: Which option holds for Xaver?", "options": ["has a premium discount", "is indemnified", "is a smoker", "is uninsurable", "is grandfathered", "has roadside assistance", "is inspected"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a premium discount", "unit_id": "u023072", "pair_id": "u023072-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023072-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "cdc1fc6c125efa06", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a17", "a15", "a5", "a11", "a13", "a14"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023072-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xaver is reinstated. Wanda is retired. Wanda is not reinstated. Xaver is bundled. Wanda is not reimbursed. Wanda has a beneficiary. Xaver is not retired. Xaver is not lapsed. Xaver is appraised. Wanda is bundled. Wanda has a dashcam. Xaver is not disputed. Xaver has no beneficiary. Xaver has a dashcam.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a rider and is retired, then it is indemnified. (2) If a policyholder has a rider and is not reimbursed, then it is uninsurable. (3) If a policyholder is bundled and has no beneficiary, then it has no adjuster. (4) If a policyholder is covered and is reinstated, then it has no flood coverage. (5) If a policyholder has a rider and is reinstated and is not retired, then it has a premium discount. (6) If a policyholder is bundled and has a dashcam and is not disputed, then it has a rider. (7) If a policyholder has a rider and is not retired and is not appraised, then it is a smoker. (8) If a policyholder has a rider and is appraised and is retired, then it is grandfathered. (9) If a policyholder is not lapsed, then it is a claimant. (10) If a policyholder has a rider and is not reinstated, then it is inspected. (11) If a policyholder has a rider and is reimbursed, then it has roadside assistance. Question: Which option holds for Xaver?", "options": ["has a premium discount", "is indemnified", "is a smoker", "is uninsurable", "is grandfathered", "has roadside assistance", "is inspected"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a premium discount", "unit_id": "u023072", "pair_id": "u023072-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023072-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "f4d305b39d523ff7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a17", "a15", "a5", "a11", "a13", "a14"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023072-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xaver is reinstated. Wanda is retired. Wanda is not reinstated. Xaver is bundled. Wanda is not reimbursed. Wanda has a beneficiary. Xaver is not retired. Xaver is not lapsed. Xaver is appraised. Wanda is bundled. Wanda has a dashcam. Xaver is not disputed. Xaver has a beneficiary. Xaver has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a rider, and is retired, that policyholder is indemnified. Item B. When the policyholder has a rider, and is not reimbursed, that policyholder is uninsurable. Item C. When the policyholder is bundled, and has no beneficiary, that policyholder has no adjuster. Item D. When the policyholder is covered, and is reinstated, that policyholder has no flood coverage. Item E. When the policyholder has a rider, and is reinstated, and is not retired, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item F. When the policyholder is bundled, and has a dashcam, and is not disputed, that policyholder has a rider. Item G. When the policyholder has a rider, and is not retired, and is not appraised, that policyholder is a smoker. Item H. When the policyholder has a rider, and is appraised, and is retired, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item I. When the policyholder is not lapsed, that policyholder is a claimant. Item J. When the policyholder has a rider, and is not reinstated, that policyholder is inspected. Item K. When the policyholder has a rider, and is reimbursed, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Question: What applies to Xaver?", "options": ["has a premium discount", "is indemnified", "is a smoker", "is uninsurable", "is grandfathered", "has roadside assistance", "is inspected"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a premium discount", "unit_id": "u023072", "pair_id": "u023072-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023072-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "cdc1fc6c125efa06", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a17", "a15", "a5", "a11", "a13", "a14"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023072-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Xaver is reinstated. Wanda is retired. Wanda is not reinstated. Xaver is bundled. Wanda is not reimbursed. Wanda has a beneficiary. Xaver is not retired. Xaver is not lapsed. Xaver is appraised. Wanda is bundled. Wanda has a dashcam. Xaver is not disputed. Xaver has no beneficiary. Xaver has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a rider, and is retired, that policyholder is indemnified. Item B. When the policyholder has a rider, and is not reimbursed, that policyholder is uninsurable. Item C. When the policyholder is bundled, and has no beneficiary, that policyholder has no adjuster. Item D. When the policyholder is covered, and is reinstated, that policyholder has no flood coverage. Item E. When the policyholder has a rider, and is reinstated, and is not retired, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item F. When the policyholder is bundled, and has a dashcam, and is not disputed, that policyholder has a rider. Item G. When the policyholder has a rider, and is not retired, and is not appraised, that policyholder is a smoker. Item H. When the policyholder has a rider, and is appraised, and is retired, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item I. When the policyholder is not lapsed, that policyholder is a claimant. Item J. When the policyholder has a rider, and is not reinstated, that policyholder is inspected. Item K. When the policyholder has a rider, and is reimbursed, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Question: What applies to Xaver?", "options": ["has a premium discount", "is indemnified", "is a smoker", "is uninsurable", "is grandfathered", "has roadside assistance", "is inspected"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a premium discount", "unit_id": "u023072", "pair_id": "u023072-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023072-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "f4d305b39d523ff7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a17", "a15", "a5", "a11", "a13", "a14"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023118-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jory is consolidated. Nandor has a delivery window of 91. Nandor is consolidated. Jory has a delivery window of 76.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is consolidated, thus it is not tracked. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a delivery window at or below 87, thus it has a locker slot. Provision 3: when the parcel here is damaged, thus it has no locker slot. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Nandor has a locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023118", "pair_id": "u023118-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023118-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "462ea8dba1f3533c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023118-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nandor is damaged. Jory is consolidated. Nandor has a delivery window of 91. Nandor is consolidated. Jory has a delivery window of 76.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is consolidated, thus it is not tracked. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a delivery window at or below 87, thus it has a locker slot. Provision 3: when the parcel here is damaged, thus it has no locker slot. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Would it be right to say that Nandor has a locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023118", "pair_id": "u023118-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023118-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ad54eb86adcf8b4d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023162-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Thilo is not prepaid. Thilo is undeliverable. Mirela is rerouted. Thilo is palletized. Thilo is rerouted. Thilo is not misrouted. Thilo has no barcode. Thilo is not labeled. Mirela is fragile. Mirela is not undeliverable. Thilo is oversized. Thilo is fragile.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is undeliverable, so it is consolidated. No. 2 While the given parcel is prepaid, so it is tracked. No. 3 While the given parcel is perishable, so it has a waybill. No. 4 While the given parcel is labeled, so it is perishable. No. 5 While the given parcel is perishable, so it is not stamped. No. 6 While the given parcel is tracked, so it is weighed. No. 7 While the given parcel is oversized, so it has a locker slot. No. 8 While the given parcel is misrouted, so it is not stamped. No. 9 While the given parcel is misrouted, so it has no locker slot. No. 10 While the given parcel is not rerouted, so it is not tracked. No. 11 While the given parcel is consolidated, so it is stamped. No. 12 While the given parcel has a barcode, so it is not perishable. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given parcel is damaged. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given parcel is fragile. No. 11 stops applying as long as the given parcel is misrouted. No. 9 wins over No. 7. No. 10 wins over No. 2. No. 11 wins over No. 8. No. 5 wins over No. 11. No. 4 wins over No. 12. Question: Select what holds for Thilo: which option?", "options": ["is weighed", "has a waybill", "is stamped"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is stamped", "unit_id": "u023162", "pair_id": "u023162-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023162-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fe6b6eb539f88501", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a12", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u023162-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Thilo is not prepaid. Thilo is undeliverable. Mirela is rerouted. Thilo is palletized. Thilo is rerouted. Thilo is not misrouted. Thilo has no barcode. Thilo is not labeled. Mirela is fragile. Mirela is not undeliverable. Thilo is oversized. Thilo is fragile.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is undeliverable, so it is consolidated. No. 2 While the given parcel is prepaid, so it is tracked. No. 3 While the given parcel is perishable, so it has a waybill. No. 4 While the given parcel is labeled, so it is perishable. No. 5 While the given parcel is perishable, so it is not stamped. No. 6 While the given parcel is tracked, so it is weighed. No. 7 While the given parcel is oversized, so it has a locker slot. No. 8 While the given parcel is misrouted, so it is not stamped. No. 9 While the given parcel is misrouted, so it has no locker slot. No. 10 While the given parcel is rerouted, so it is not tracked. No. 11 While the given parcel is consolidated, so it is stamped. No. 12 While the given parcel has a barcode, so it is not perishable. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given parcel is damaged. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given parcel is fragile. No. 11 stops applying as long as the given parcel is misrouted. No. 9 wins over No. 7. No. 10 wins over No. 2. No. 11 wins over No. 8. No. 5 wins over No. 11. No. 4 wins over No. 12. Question: Select what holds for Thilo: which option?", "options": ["is weighed", "has a waybill", "is stamped"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is stamped", "unit_id": "u023162", "pair_id": "u023162-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023162-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "dec112a16089656a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a12", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u023167-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is seasoned. Petra has a background screening. Petra has a seniority step of 68. Jasna has no background screening.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has a mentor, it then is bilingual. #2 Each time a candidate is seasoned, it then has a mentor. #3 Each time a candidate is eligible, it then is not bilingual. #4 Each time a candidate has a seniority step of 50 or below, it then is eligible. Question: Do the terms above show that Petra is bilingual?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023167", "pair_id": "u023167-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023167-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "4c18163a14aa1f00", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023167-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is seasoned. Petra has a background screening. Petra has a seniority step of 68. Jasna has no background screening.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has a background screening, it then is probationary. #2 Each time a candidate has a mentor, it then is bilingual. #3 Each time a candidate is seasoned, it then has a mentor. #4 Each time a candidate is eligible, it then is not bilingual. #5 Each time a candidate has a seniority step of 50 or below, it then is eligible. Question: Do the terms above show that Petra is bilingual?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023167", "pair_id": "u023167-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023167-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "57d0b8a6a63b8902", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023176-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is profiled. Basalt has a lint backlog of 22. Basalt is not minified. Basalt is reverted. Basalt has a test yield of 24. Basalt is not tagged. Basalt has no feature toggle. Basalt is not backported. Basalt is localized.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is merged provided that it is localized as well as is reverted as well as is profiled. Section 2: a build is benchmarked provided that it has no feature toggle as well as is reverted. Section 3: a build is not tested provided that it is benchmarked as well as has a test yield of 30 or lower as well as has a lint backlog of 22 or higher. Section 4: a build is tested provided that it is benchmarked as well as has a test yield exceeding 30 as well as is not minified. Section 2 lapses for a build if it is backported. Section 1 lapses for a build if it has a feature toggle. Section 3 lapses for a build if it is minified as well as is not tagged. Question: Basalt is tested. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023176", "pair_id": "u023176-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023176-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4be03959611e9dfb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023176-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is not profiled. Basalt has a lint backlog of 22. Basalt is not minified. Basalt is reverted. Basalt has a test yield of 24. Basalt is not tagged. Basalt has no feature toggle. Basalt is not backported. Basalt is localized.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is merged provided that it is localized as well as is reverted as well as is profiled. Section 2: a build is benchmarked provided that it has no feature toggle as well as is reverted. Section 3: a build is not tested provided that it is benchmarked as well as has a test yield of 30 or lower as well as has a lint backlog of 22 or higher. Section 4: a build is tested provided that it is benchmarked as well as has a test yield exceeding 30 as well as is not minified. Section 2 lapses for a build if it is backported. Section 1 lapses for a build if it has a feature toggle. Section 3 lapses for a build if it is minified as well as is not tagged. Question: Basalt is tested. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023176", "pair_id": "u023176-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023176-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "09361706b69f8187", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023176-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is profiled. Basalt has a lint backlog of 22. Basalt is not minified. Basalt is reverted. Basalt has a test yield of 24. Basalt is not tagged. Basalt has no feature toggle. Basalt is not backported. Basalt is localized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is localized and additionally is reverted and additionally is profiled, it then is merged. #2 Each time a build has no feature toggle and additionally is reverted, it then is benchmarked. #3 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally has a test yield of 30 or below and additionally has a lint backlog of 22 or above, it then is not tested. #4 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally has a test yield greater than 30 and additionally is not minified, it then is tested. #2 is set aside if a build is backported. #1 is set aside if a build has a feature toggle. #3 is set aside if a build is minified and additionally is not tagged. Question: Do the terms above show that Basalt is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023176", "pair_id": "u023176-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023176-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4be03959611e9dfb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023176-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is not profiled. Basalt has a lint backlog of 22. Basalt is not minified. Basalt is reverted. Basalt has a test yield of 24. Basalt is not tagged. Basalt has no feature toggle. Basalt is not backported. Basalt is localized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is localized and additionally is reverted and additionally is profiled, it then is merged. #2 Each time a build has no feature toggle and additionally is reverted, it then is benchmarked. #3 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally has a test yield of 30 or below and additionally has a lint backlog of 22 or above, it then is not tested. #4 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally has a test yield greater than 30 and additionally is not minified, it then is tested. #2 is set aside if a build is backported. #1 is set aside if a build has a feature toggle. #3 is set aside if a build is minified and additionally is not tagged. Question: Do the terms above show that Basalt is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023176", "pair_id": "u023176-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023176-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "09361706b69f8187", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023216-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is embargoed. Nashira is not embargoed. Capella has no seed funding. Nashira is exploratory. Capella is a pilot study. Capella is exploratory. Capella has a review mark of 93. Nashira is a pilot study. Nashira has a review mark of 51.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is translational and further has a review mark short of 61, it thereby has a postdoc. Point B. If said proposal is not exploratory, it thereby has no steering committee. Point C. If said proposal has a patent filing and further has a review mark of minimum 58, it thereby is translational. Point D. If said proposal has no seed funding and further is a pilot study, it thereby has a patent filing. Point E. If said proposal is translational and further has a review mark of minimum 61 and further is embargoed, it thereby has no postdoc. Question: Statement: Capella has a postdoc. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023216", "pair_id": "u023216-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023216-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "da7b4b1ab77c53a6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023216-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is embargoed. Nashira is not embargoed. Capella has no seed funding. Nashira is exploratory. Capella is a pilot study. Capella is exploratory. Capella has a review mark of 93. Nashira is a pilot study. Nashira has a review mark of 51.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is translational and further has a review mark short of 61, it thereby has a postdoc. Point B. If said proposal is not exploratory, it thereby has no steering committee. Point C. If said proposal has a patent filing and further has a review mark of minimum 58, it thereby is translational. Point D. If said proposal has seed funding and further is a pilot study, it thereby has a patent filing. Point E. If said proposal is translational and further has a review mark of minimum 61 and further is embargoed, it thereby has no postdoc. Question: Statement: Capella has a postdoc. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023216", "pair_id": "u023216-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023216-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d02e735c285f0ab2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023243-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is not tagged. Shale is not reproducible. Feldspar is documented. Feldspar is fuzzed. Feldspar is tagged. Feldspar is not localized. Feldspar is not reproducible.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is not documented, thus it is not merged. Provision 2: when the build here is reverted, thus it is profiled. Provision 3: when the build here is localized, thus it is versioned. Provision 4: when the build here has a security advisory, thus it is merged. Provision 5: when the build here is reproducible while is fuzzed while is tagged, thus it has a feature toggle. Provision 6: when the build here is reproducible while is documented, thus it has no feature toggle. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Feldspar has a feature toggle?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023243", "pair_id": "u023243-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023243-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "31ea6e8bb5ee7e10", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u023243-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is not tagged. Shale is not reproducible. Feldspar is documented. Feldspar is fuzzed. Feldspar is tagged. Feldspar is not localized. Feldspar is not reproducible.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is documented, thus it is not merged. Provision 2: when the build here is reverted, thus it is profiled. Provision 3: when the build here is localized, thus it is versioned. Provision 4: when the build here has a security advisory, thus it is merged. Provision 5: when the build here is reproducible while is fuzzed while is tagged, thus it has a feature toggle. Provision 6: when the build here is reproducible while is documented, thus it has no feature toggle. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Feldspar has a feature toggle?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023243", "pair_id": "u023243-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023243-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "22da0224e928be10", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u023247-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has a risk tier of 15. Corin is not vetted. Corin has a cosigner. Corin is not creditworthy. Corin has a repayment grade of 54. Corin is not a depositor. Corin is overdrawn. Corin is not underwritten. Corin has no escrow account.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is bankrupt while has a repayment grade at or below 81 while is a depositor, thus it has collateral. Provision 2: when the borrower here has a risk tier at or below 65, thus it has a lien. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a lien, thus it is bankrupt. Provision 4: when the borrower here is bankrupt while is vetted while is not underwritten, thus it is not delinquent. Provision 5: when the borrower here is bankrupt while is not vetted while is not creditworthy, thus it is delinquent. Provision 6: when the borrower here is a depositor while has an escrow account, thus it is garnished. Provision 7: when the borrower here is overdrawn, thus it is not a homeowner. Provision 2 has no effect when the borrower here is refinanced while has a cosigner. Provision 6 has no effect when the borrower here is vetted. Question: Would it be right to say that Corin is delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023247", "pair_id": "u023247-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023247-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c0f1bf3e5c1116e6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a14", "neg": false}, "attempt": 26}}
{"id": "syn-u023247-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has a risk tier of 15. Corin is vetted. Corin has a cosigner. Corin is not creditworthy. Corin has a repayment grade of 54. Corin is not a depositor. Corin is overdrawn. Corin is not underwritten. Corin has no escrow account.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is bankrupt while has a repayment grade at or below 81 while is a depositor, thus it has collateral. Provision 2: when the borrower here has a risk tier at or below 65, thus it has a lien. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a lien, thus it is bankrupt. Provision 4: when the borrower here is bankrupt while is vetted while is not underwritten, thus it is not delinquent. Provision 5: when the borrower here is bankrupt while is not vetted while is not creditworthy, thus it is delinquent. Provision 6: when the borrower here is a depositor while has an escrow account, thus it is garnished. Provision 7: when the borrower here is overdrawn, thus it is not a homeowner. Provision 2 has no effect when the borrower here is refinanced while has a cosigner. Provision 6 has no effect when the borrower here is vetted. Question: Would it be right to say that Corin is delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023247", "pair_id": "u023247-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023247-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ebc93d0f0d30beb7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a14", "neg": false}, "attempt": 26}}
{"id": "syn-u023268-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is not bilingual. Lotte is unionized. Mads is bilingual. Mads is unionized. Noor is unionized. Mads has no mentor. Lotte is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is certified provided that it has a mentor as well as is unionized as well as is not bilingual. Question: Mads is bilingual. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023268", "pair_id": "u023268-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023268-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "c3239297d17bf7b4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023268-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is not bilingual. Lotte is unionized. Mads is not bilingual. Mads is unionized. Noor is unionized. Mads has no mentor. Lotte is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is certified provided that it has a mentor as well as is unionized as well as is not bilingual. Question: Mads is bilingual. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023268", "pair_id": "u023268-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023268-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "3f4fa20ac095c059", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023269-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has no security advisory. Basalt is localized. Zircon has a security advisory. Galena has a test yield of 18. Basalt has a test yield of 88. Shale is localized. Zircon is localized.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is experimental, then it has no changelog. (2) If a build has a security advisory, then it is experimental. (3) If a build is obsolete, then it is backported. (4) If a build has a changelog, then it is benchmarked. (5) If a build is backported, then it is signed. (6) If a build has no changelog, then it is not signed. (7) If a build is localized, then it is reverted. Question: Is it true that Basalt is signed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023269", "pair_id": "u023269-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023269-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "ea70e003f7a400cc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023269-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has no security advisory. Basalt is localized. Zircon has a security advisory. Galena has a test yield of 18. Basalt has a test yield of 88. Shale is localized. Zircon is localized.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is experimental, then it has no changelog. (2) If a build has a security advisory, then it is experimental. (3) If a build has a test yield above 70, then it is obsolete. (4) If a build is obsolete, then it is backported. (5) If a build has a changelog, then it is benchmarked. (6) If a build is backported, then it is signed. (7) If a build has no changelog, then it is not signed. (8) If a build is localized, then it is reverted. Question: Is it true that Basalt is signed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023269", "pair_id": "u023269-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023269-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "dbc6aa37cb212264", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023269-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has no security advisory. Basalt is localized. Zircon has a security advisory. Galena has a test yield of 18. Basalt has a test yield of 88. Shale is localized. Zircon is localized.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is experimental, it also has no changelog. Clause 2: once any build has a security advisory, it also is experimental. Clause 3: once any build is obsolete, it also is backported. Clause 4: once any build has a changelog, it also is benchmarked. Clause 5: once any build is backported, it also is signed. Clause 6: once any build has no changelog, it also is not signed. Clause 7: once any build is localized, it also is reverted. Question: Does it follow that Basalt is signed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023269", "pair_id": "u023269-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023269-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "ea70e003f7a400cc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023269-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has no security advisory. Basalt is localized. Zircon has a security advisory. Galena has a test yield of 18. Basalt has a test yield of 88. Shale is localized. Zircon is localized.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is experimental, it also has no changelog. Clause 2: once any build has a security advisory, it also is experimental. Clause 3: once any build has a test yield over 70, it also is obsolete. Clause 4: once any build is obsolete, it also is backported. Clause 5: once any build has a changelog, it also is benchmarked. Clause 6: once any build is backported, it also is signed. Clause 7: once any build has no changelog, it also is not signed. Clause 8: once any build is localized, it also is reverted. Question: Does it follow that Basalt is signed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023269", "pair_id": "u023269-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023269-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "dbc6aa37cb212264", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023290-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is multicenter. Hadar has a citation index of 61. Kochab is cofunded. Electra has a citation index of 48. Kochab is not multicenter. Kochab has a citation index of 54.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a citation index above 52, then it is not translational. (2) If a proposal has a citation index above 32, then it is not preregistered. (3) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is translational. (4) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is preregistered. (5) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is exploratory. (6) If a proposal has a citation index above 45, then it is shortlisted. (7) If a proposal is translational, then it is not collaborative. (8) If a proposal is exploratory, then it is collaborative. (9) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is interdisciplinary. When (8) and (7) clash, (8) prevails. When (1) and (3) clash, (1) prevails. When (2) and (4) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Electra is not collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023290", "pair_id": "u023290-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023290-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0fff0a1f2cc7c9fd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u023290-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is multicenter. Hadar has a citation index of 61. Kochab is cofunded. Electra has a citation index of 48. Kochab is not multicenter. Kochab has a citation index of 54.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a citation index above 52, then it is not translational. (2) If a proposal has a citation index above 32, then it is not preregistered. (3) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is translational. (4) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is preregistered. (5) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is exploratory. (6) If a proposal has a citation index above 45, then it is shortlisted. (7) If a proposal is translational, then it is not collaborative. (8) If a proposal is exploratory, then it is collaborative. (9) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is interdisciplinary. When (7) and (8) clash, (7) prevails. When (1) and (3) clash, (1) prevails. When (2) and (4) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Electra is not collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023290", "pair_id": "u023290-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023290-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bd048d939210bdd2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u023290-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is multicenter. Hadar has a citation index of 61. Kochab is cofunded. Electra has a citation index of 48. Kochab is not multicenter. Kochab has a citation index of 54.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has a citation index of more than 52, that proposal is not translational. Item B. When the proposal has a citation index of more than 32, that proposal is not preregistered. Item C. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal is translational. Item D. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal is preregistered. Item E. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal is exploratory. Item F. When the proposal has a citation index of more than 45, that proposal is shortlisted. Item G. When the proposal is translational, that proposal is not collaborative. Item H. When the proposal is exploratory, that proposal is collaborative. Item I. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item H outranks Item G. Item A outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Electra is not collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023290", "pair_id": "u023290-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023290-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0fff0a1f2cc7c9fd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u023290-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is multicenter. Hadar has a citation index of 61. Kochab is cofunded. Electra has a citation index of 48. Kochab is not multicenter. Kochab has a citation index of 54.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has a citation index of more than 52, that proposal is not translational. Item B. When the proposal has a citation index of more than 32, that proposal is not preregistered. Item C. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal is translational. Item D. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal is preregistered. Item E. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal is exploratory. Item F. When the proposal has a citation index of more than 45, that proposal is shortlisted. Item G. When the proposal is translational, that proposal is not collaborative. Item H. When the proposal is exploratory, that proposal is collaborative. Item I. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item G outranks Item H. Item A outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Electra is not collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023290", "pair_id": "u023290-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023290-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bd048d939210bdd2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u023328-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has a repayment grade of 8. Bastien is bankrupt. Bastien has no escrow account.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has collateral provided that it has a lien. Section 2: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it has a repayment grade lower than 15. Section 3: a borrower is a depositor provided that it is not bankrupt. Section 4: a borrower has no cosigner provided that it has no lien. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it has a lien. Section 1 lapses for a borrower if it is bankrupt. Section 4 lapses for a borrower if it has no escrow account. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Bastien is a homeowner. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023328", "pair_id": "u023328-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023328-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2128be4d2fad1677", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023328-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has a repayment grade of 8. Bastien is bankrupt. Bastien has no escrow account. Bastien is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has collateral provided that it has a lien. Section 2: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it has a repayment grade lower than 15. Section 3: a borrower is a depositor provided that it is not bankrupt. Section 4: a borrower has no cosigner provided that it has no lien. Section 3 lapses for a borrower if it has a lien. Section 1 lapses for a borrower if it is bankrupt. Section 4 lapses for a borrower if it has no escrow account. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Bastien is a homeowner. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023328", "pair_id": "u023328-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023328-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e22fb85b80594d99", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023379-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is reverted. Obsidian is signed. Obsidian is fuzzed. Obsidian is flaky. Obsidian is versioned. Obsidian is not linted. Obsidian is not documented. Obsidian is not backported.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is backported and additionally is experimental and additionally is not versioned, it then is reproducible. #2 Each time a build is minified and additionally is signed, it then is notarized. #3 Each time a build is reverted, it then has a migration script. #4 Each time a build is minified and additionally is flaky and additionally is linted, it then is compiled. #5 Each time a build is fuzzed, it then is not profiled. #6 Each time a build is minified and additionally is not signed, it then is localized. #7 Each time a build is minified and additionally is benchmarked, it then is obsolete. #8 Each time a build has a migration script and additionally is reverted and additionally is not documented, it then is minified. #9 Each time a build is minified and additionally is not flaky and additionally is versioned, it then is tagged. #10 Each time a build is minified and additionally is not benchmarked and additionally is not profiled, it then is merged. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Obsidian?", "options": ["is compiled", "is notarized", "is localized", "is obsolete", "is merged", "is tagged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is notarized", "unit_id": "u023379", "pair_id": "u023379-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023379-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "c1da7f9913f0eafc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a19", "a5", "a16", "a6", "a17"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023379-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is reverted. Obsidian is signed. Obsidian is not fuzzed. Obsidian is flaky. Obsidian is versioned. Obsidian is not linted. Obsidian is not documented. Obsidian is not backported.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is backported and additionally is experimental and additionally is not versioned, it then is reproducible. #2 Each time a build is minified and additionally is signed, it then is notarized. #3 Each time a build is reverted, it then has a migration script. #4 Each time a build is minified and additionally is flaky and additionally is linted, it then is compiled. #5 Each time a build is fuzzed, it then is not profiled. #6 Each time a build is minified and additionally is not signed, it then is localized. #7 Each time a build is minified and additionally is benchmarked, it then is obsolete. #8 Each time a build has a migration script and additionally is reverted and additionally is not documented, it then is minified. #9 Each time a build is minified and additionally is not flaky and additionally is versioned, it then is tagged. #10 Each time a build is minified and additionally is not benchmarked and additionally is not profiled, it then is merged. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Obsidian?", "options": ["is compiled", "is notarized", "is localized", "is obsolete", "is merged", "is tagged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is notarized", "unit_id": "u023379", "pair_id": "u023379-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023379-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "8475a0f01e83d7bd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a19", "a5", "a16", "a6", "a17"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023450-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk has a risk tier of 59. Evren is bankrupt. Tomas is not vetted. Tomas has a risk tier of 85. Tomas has a debt ratio of 50. Evren has a debt ratio of 86. Tomas has no guarantor. Anouk has a debt ratio of 47.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no cosigner provided that it has a debt ratio of 51 or lower as well as has a risk tier exceeding 16. Section 2: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it has a debt ratio of 51 or lower as well as has a risk tier of 16 or lower. Section 3: a borrower is not prequalified provided that it is not vetted as well as is bankrupt as well as has a guarantor. Question: Tomas has a cosigner. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023450", "pair_id": "u023450-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023450-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8f4b70330a2791c5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u023450-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk has a risk tier of 59. Evren is bankrupt. Tomas is not vetted. Tomas has a risk tier of 85. Tomas has a debt ratio of 71. Evren has a debt ratio of 86. Tomas has no guarantor. Anouk has a debt ratio of 47.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no cosigner provided that it has a debt ratio of 51 or lower as well as has a risk tier exceeding 16. Section 2: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it has a debt ratio of 51 or lower as well as has a risk tier of 16 or lower. Section 3: a borrower is not prequalified provided that it is not vetted as well as is bankrupt as well as has a guarantor. Question: Tomas has a cosigner. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023450", "pair_id": "u023450-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023450-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "6be9f05103e6b521", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u023468-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is litigated. Zdenek is litigated. Una is lapsed. Zdenek is lapsed. Zdenek is reinstated. Zdenek has no premium discount.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is lapsed, thus it is subrogated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is lapsed, thus it is not subrogated. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is not litigated, thus it has a rider. Provision 2 has no effect when the policyholder here is not reinstated. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here has no premium discount. Provision 2 has no effect when the policyholder here has a premium discount. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Zdenek is not subrogated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023468", "pair_id": "u023468-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023468-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4e48b0feb54dc2da", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u023468-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is litigated. Zdenek is not litigated. Una is lapsed. Zdenek is lapsed. Zdenek is reinstated. Zdenek has no premium discount.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is lapsed, thus it is subrogated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is lapsed, thus it is not subrogated. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is not litigated, thus it has a rider. Provision 2 has no effect when the policyholder here is not reinstated. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here has no premium discount. Provision 2 has no effect when the policyholder here has a premium discount. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Zdenek is not subrogated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023468", "pair_id": "u023468-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023468-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7b21ccdbd8cdeda1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u023468-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is litigated. Zdenek is litigated. Una is lapsed. Zdenek is lapsed. Zdenek is reinstated. Zdenek has no premium discount.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is lapsed, so it is subrogated. No. 2 While the given policyholder is lapsed, so it is not subrogated. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not litigated, so it has a rider. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not reinstated. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has no premium discount. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a premium discount. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Zdenek is not subrogated\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023468", "pair_id": "u023468-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023468-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4e48b0feb54dc2da", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u023468-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is litigated. Zdenek is not litigated. Una is lapsed. Zdenek is lapsed. Zdenek is reinstated. Zdenek has no premium discount.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is lapsed, so it is subrogated. No. 2 While the given policyholder is lapsed, so it is not subrogated. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not litigated, so it has a rider. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not reinstated. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has no premium discount. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a premium discount. No. 2 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Zdenek is not subrogated\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023468", "pair_id": "u023468-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023468-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7b21ccdbd8cdeda1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u023502-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is not reimbursed. Celeste is lapsed. Edda is not subrogated. Celeste is litigated. Celeste is reimbursed. Celeste has a deductible waiver. Edda is not lapsed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed: then it is covered. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed: then it is not grandfathered. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed: then it is not covered. Policy III is waived if that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Policy III is waived if that policyholder is litigated. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is subrogated. Policy II is waived if that policyholder is indemnified. Policy I is waived if that policyholder has no deductible waiver. Question: Is it so that Edda is covered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023502", "pair_id": "u023502-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023502-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "24be1d1f2271c35f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u023502-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is not reimbursed. Celeste is lapsed. Edda is not subrogated. Celeste is litigated. Celeste is reimbursed. Celeste has a deductible waiver. Edda is not lapsed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed: then it is covered. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is not reimbursed: then it is not grandfathered. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is lapsed: then it is not covered. Policy III is waived if that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Policy III is waived if that policyholder is litigated. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is subrogated. Policy II is waived if that policyholder is indemnified. Policy I is waived if that policyholder has no deductible waiver. Question: Is it so that Edda is covered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023502", "pair_id": "u023502-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023502-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4e6464acaa69f714", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u023515-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is signed. Galena is versioned. Galena is not experimental.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is minified, then it is not fuzzed. (2) If a build is versioned, then it is localized. (3) If a build is localized, then it is minified. (4) If a build is minified, then it is fuzzed. (5) If a build is not experimental, then it is linted. (4) is void if the build is not signed. (4) is void if the build is not signed. (1) is void if the build is signed. Question: Is it true that Galena is fuzzed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023515", "pair_id": "u023515-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023515-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3448e402563201c1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023515-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is signed. Galena is versioned. Galena is not experimental.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is minified, then it is not fuzzed. (2) If a build is versioned, then it is localized. (3) If a build is localized, then it is minified. (4) If a build is minified, then it is fuzzed. (5) If a build is experimental, then it is linted. (4) is void if the build is not signed. (4) is void if the build is not signed. (1) is void if the build is signed. Question: Is it true that Galena is fuzzed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023515", "pair_id": "u023515-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023515-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d1d5aa6c7ca2001b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023561-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has a seniority step of 72. Jasna is seasoned. Jasna is not headhunted. Lotte is not headhunted. Lotte has a seniority step of 49. Teodor is headhunted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has a seniority step at or above 78, thus it is a veteran. Provision 2: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is freelance. Provision 3: when the candidate here is interviewed, thus it is not fingerprinted. Provision 4: when the candidate here is a veteran, thus it is interviewed. Provision 5: when the candidate here is a veteran, thus it is sponsored. Provision 6: when the candidate here is licensed, thus it is fingerprinted. Provision 7: when the candidate here is freelance, thus it is licensed. Provision 8: when the candidate here is seasoned, thus it is not onboarded. Provision 9: when the candidate here is not seasoned, thus it has a diploma. Question: Would it be right to say that Jasna is fingerprinted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023561", "pair_id": "u023561-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023561-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1ac96d4efc2b4f60", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023561-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has a seniority step of 72. Jasna is seasoned. Jasna is not headhunted. Lotte is not headhunted. Lotte has a seniority step of 49. Teodor is headhunted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has a seniority step at or above 78, thus it is a veteran. Provision 2: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is freelance. Provision 3: when the candidate here is interviewed, thus it is not fingerprinted. Provision 4: when the candidate here is a veteran, thus it is interviewed. Provision 5: when the candidate here is a veteran, thus it is sponsored. Provision 6: when the candidate here is licensed, thus it is fingerprinted. Provision 7: when the candidate here is freelance, thus it is licensed. Provision 8: when the candidate here is seasoned, thus it is not onboarded. Provision 9: when the candidate here is seasoned, thus it has a diploma. Question: Would it be right to say that Jasna is fingerprinted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023561", "pair_id": "u023561-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023561-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "7653b500c7b88450", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023561-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has a seniority step of 72. Jasna is seasoned. Jasna is not headhunted. Lotte is not headhunted. Lotte has a seniority step of 49. Teodor is headhunted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a seniority step of minimum 78, it thereby is a veteran. Point B. If said candidate is headhunted, it thereby is freelance. Point C. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby is not fingerprinted. Point D. If said candidate is a veteran, it thereby is interviewed. Point E. If said candidate is a veteran, it thereby is sponsored. Point F. If said candidate is licensed, it thereby is fingerprinted. Point G. If said candidate is freelance, it thereby is licensed. Point H. If said candidate is seasoned, it thereby is not onboarded. Point I. If said candidate is not seasoned, it thereby has a diploma. Question: Statement: Jasna is fingerprinted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023561", "pair_id": "u023561-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023561-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1ac96d4efc2b4f60", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023561-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna has a seniority step of 72. Jasna is seasoned. Jasna is not headhunted. Lotte is not headhunted. Lotte has a seniority step of 49. Teodor is headhunted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a seniority step of minimum 78, it thereby is a veteran. Point B. If said candidate is headhunted, it thereby is freelance. Point C. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby is not fingerprinted. Point D. If said candidate is a veteran, it thereby is interviewed. Point E. If said candidate is a veteran, it thereby is sponsored. Point F. If said candidate is licensed, it thereby is fingerprinted. Point G. If said candidate is freelance, it thereby is licensed. Point H. If said candidate is seasoned, it thereby is not onboarded. Point I. If said candidate is seasoned, it thereby has a diploma. Question: Statement: Jasna is fingerprinted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023561", "pair_id": "u023561-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023561-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "7653b500c7b88450", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023587-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile is not labeled. Ulla is labeled. Ulla has a postal zone of 89. Ulla is not delayed. Ulla is prepaid. Odile has a weight class of 61. Ulla has a delivery window of 93. Odile has a delivery window of 83. Odile is not undeliverable.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is refrigerated provided that it has a delivery window exceeding 83 as well as has a postal zone of 89 or lower as well as is labeled. Section 2: a parcel is sealed provided that it has a delivery window lower than 84. Section 3: a parcel is not sealed provided that it has a postal zone lower than 64. Section 4: a parcel has no waybill provided that it has a delivery window lower than 31. Section 5: a parcel is not refrigerated provided that it has a delivery window exceeding 83 as well as has a postal zone exceeding 89. Section 6: a parcel has a waybill provided that it is prepaid. Section 6 lapses for a parcel if it is undeliverable. Section 5 lapses for a parcel if it is labeled as well as has a weight class of 23 or lower. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Ulla is refrigerated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023587", "pair_id": "u023587-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023587-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0f8abd79ece071d4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u023587-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile is not labeled. Ulla is labeled. Ulla has a postal zone of 18. Ulla is not delayed. Ulla is prepaid. Odile has a weight class of 61. Ulla has a delivery window of 93. Odile has a delivery window of 83. Odile is not undeliverable.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is refrigerated provided that it has a delivery window exceeding 83 as well as has a postal zone of 89 or lower as well as is labeled. Section 2: a parcel is sealed provided that it has a delivery window lower than 84. Section 3: a parcel is not sealed provided that it has a postal zone lower than 64. Section 4: a parcel has no waybill provided that it has a delivery window lower than 31. Section 5: a parcel is not refrigerated provided that it has a delivery window exceeding 83 as well as has a postal zone exceeding 89. Section 6: a parcel has a waybill provided that it is prepaid. Section 6 lapses for a parcel if it is undeliverable. Section 5 lapses for a parcel if it is labeled as well as has a weight class of 23 or lower. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Ulla is refrigerated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023587", "pair_id": "u023587-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023587-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec35896328baed72", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u023640-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo has a payout ceiling of 56. Viggo is not lapsed. Viggo is not litigated. Viggo has a peril factor of 85.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a peril factor over 84, it also is disputed. Clause 2: once any policyholder is litigated, it also has flood coverage. Clause 3: once any policyholder is retired, it also is a smoker. Clause 4: once any policyholder has a claim frequency of 54 or less, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a claim frequency over 54, it also is bundled. Clause 6: once any policyholder has a peril factor of 84 or less, it also is reinstated. Clause 7: once any policyholder is bundled, it also is not a claimant. Clause 8: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling of 85 or more, it also is indemnified. Clause 9: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is subrogated. Clause 8 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a claim frequency over 38. Clause 9 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a claim frequency of 74 or less. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is retired. Question: Which of these is true of Viggo?", "options": ["is bundled", "is reinstated", "is a smoker", "has flood coverage", "has a beneficiary", "is disputed"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is disputed", "unit_id": "u023640", "pair_id": "u023640-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023640-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0d1ec1ace48c82de", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a10", "a0", "a13", "a3", "a6"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u023640-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo has a payout ceiling of 56. Viggo is not lapsed. Viggo is not litigated. Viggo has a peril factor of 79.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a peril factor over 84, it also is disputed. Clause 2: once any policyholder is litigated, it also has flood coverage. Clause 3: once any policyholder is retired, it also is a smoker. Clause 4: once any policyholder has a claim frequency of 54 or less, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a claim frequency over 54, it also is bundled. Clause 6: once any policyholder has a peril factor of 84 or less, it also is reinstated. Clause 7: once any policyholder is bundled, it also is not a claimant. Clause 8: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling of 85 or more, it also is indemnified. Clause 9: once any policyholder is lapsed, it also is subrogated. Clause 8 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a claim frequency over 38. Clause 9 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a claim frequency of 74 or less. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is retired. Question: Which of these is true of Viggo?", "options": ["is bundled", "is reinstated", "is a smoker", "has flood coverage", "has a beneficiary", "is disputed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is reinstated", "unit_id": "u023640", "pair_id": "u023640-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023640-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "01809b516df4f827", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a10", "a0", "a13", "a3", "a6"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u023651-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has a changelog. Talc is benchmarked. Talc has no changelog. Basalt is not localized. Shale is not benchmarked. Shale is profiled. Basalt is profiled. Talc is not localized. Talc is not profiled. Basalt is tagged. Shale has no changelog. Talc is minified. Talc is tagged.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is not compiled provided that it has no feature toggle as well as is minified. Section 2: a build is linted provided that it is benchmarked. Section 3: a build is compiled provided that it has no feature toggle as well as is not minified as well as is not profiled. Section 4: a build has no feature toggle provided that it is linted as well as has no changelog as well as is tagged. Section 5: a build is reproducible provided that it is localized. Question: Talc is compiled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023651", "pair_id": "u023651-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023651-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "5446e23c4d6ddc1c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u023651-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has a changelog. Talc is benchmarked. Talc has no changelog. Basalt is not localized. Shale is not benchmarked. Shale is profiled. Basalt is profiled. Talc is not localized. Talc is not profiled. Basalt is tagged. Shale has no changelog. Talc is not minified. Talc is tagged.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is not compiled provided that it has no feature toggle as well as is minified. Section 2: a build is linted provided that it is benchmarked. Section 3: a build is compiled provided that it has no feature toggle as well as is not minified as well as is not profiled. Section 4: a build has no feature toggle provided that it is linted as well as has no changelog as well as is tagged. Section 5: a build is reproducible provided that it is localized. Question: Talc is compiled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023651", "pair_id": "u023651-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023651-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "345ee00f40425561", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u023651-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has a changelog. Talc is benchmarked. Talc has no changelog. Basalt is not localized. Shale is not benchmarked. Shale is profiled. Basalt is profiled. Talc is not localized. Talc is not profiled. Basalt is tagged. Shale has no changelog. Talc is minified. Talc is tagged.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has no feature toggle plus is minified: then it is not compiled. Policy II. Suppose that build is benchmarked: then it is linted. Policy III. Suppose that build has no feature toggle plus is not minified plus is not profiled: then it is compiled. Policy IV. Suppose that build is linted plus has no changelog plus is tagged: then it has no feature toggle. Policy V. Suppose that build is localized: then it is reproducible. Question: Is it so that Talc is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023651", "pair_id": "u023651-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023651-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "5446e23c4d6ddc1c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u023651-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has a changelog. Talc is benchmarked. Talc has no changelog. Basalt is not localized. Shale is not benchmarked. Shale is profiled. Basalt is profiled. Talc is not localized. Talc is not profiled. Basalt is tagged. Shale has no changelog. Talc is not minified. Talc is tagged.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has no feature toggle plus is minified: then it is not compiled. Policy II. Suppose that build is benchmarked: then it is linted. Policy III. Suppose that build has no feature toggle plus is not minified plus is not profiled: then it is compiled. Policy IV. Suppose that build is linted plus has no changelog plus is tagged: then it has no feature toggle. Policy V. Suppose that build is localized: then it is reproducible. Question: Is it so that Talc is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023651", "pair_id": "u023651-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023651-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "345ee00f40425561", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u023651-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has a changelog. Talc is benchmarked. Talc has no changelog. Basalt is not localized. Shale is not benchmarked. Shale is profiled. Basalt is profiled. Talc is not localized. Talc is not profiled. Basalt is tagged. Shale has no changelog. Talc is minified. Talc is tagged.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has no feature toggle and additionally is minified, it then is not compiled. #2 Each time a build is benchmarked, it then is linted. #3 Each time a build has no feature toggle and additionally is not minified and additionally is not profiled, it then is compiled. #4 Each time a build is linted and additionally has no changelog and additionally is tagged, it then has no feature toggle. #5 Each time a build is localized, it then is reproducible. Question: Do the terms above show that Talc is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023651", "pair_id": "u023651-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023651-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "5446e23c4d6ddc1c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u023651-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt has a changelog. Talc is benchmarked. Talc has no changelog. Basalt is not localized. Shale is not benchmarked. Shale is profiled. Basalt is profiled. Talc is not localized. Talc is not profiled. Basalt is tagged. Shale has no changelog. Talc is not minified. Talc is tagged.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has no feature toggle and additionally is minified, it then is not compiled. #2 Each time a build is benchmarked, it then is linted. #3 Each time a build has no feature toggle and additionally is not minified and additionally is not profiled, it then is compiled. #4 Each time a build is linted and additionally has no changelog and additionally is tagged, it then has no feature toggle. #5 Each time a build is localized, it then is reproducible. Question: Do the terms above show that Talc is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023651", "pair_id": "u023651-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023651-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "345ee00f40425561", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u023665-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is lapsed. Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has a peril factor of 97. Bruno has a peril factor of 79. Dmitri is lapsed. Una has a rider. Viggo has a rider. Viggo is not disputed. Viggo is lapsed. Dmitri has a rider.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is a claimant: then it has a dashcam. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has no dashcam: then it is reinstated. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has no rider: then it is bundled. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it is a claimant. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is a claimant: then it has no dashcam. Policy II is waived if that policyholder is lapsed. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is lapsed. Policy IV is waived if that policyholder has a peril factor no higher than 55. Policy V is waived if that policyholder is not lapsed. Question: Is it so that Viggo has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023665", "pair_id": "u023665-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023665-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "831badc8ec9f1089", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023665-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is lapsed. Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has a peril factor of 97. Bruno has a peril factor of 79. Dmitri is lapsed. Una has a rider. Viggo has no rider. Viggo is not disputed. Viggo is lapsed. Dmitri has a rider.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is a claimant: then it has a dashcam. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has no dashcam: then it is reinstated. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has no rider: then it is bundled. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it is a claimant. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is a claimant: then it has no dashcam. Policy II is waived if that policyholder is lapsed. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is lapsed. Policy IV is waived if that policyholder has a peril factor no higher than 55. Policy V is waived if that policyholder is not lapsed. Question: Is it so that Viggo has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023665", "pair_id": "u023665-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023665-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "15129925d3a1340c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023697-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is not pensioned. Folke has no guarantor. Ingrid is indebted. Folke is indebted. Ingrid has no guarantor.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is indebted, it then is vetted. #2 Each time a borrower is indebted, it then is solvent. #3 Each time a borrower is indebted, it then is not vetted. #4 Each time a borrower is pensioned, it then is not solvent. #5 Each time a borrower has a guarantor, it then is overdrawn. #6 Each time a borrower is pensioned, it then is not overdrawn. #3 yields to #1. #2 yields to #4. #5 yields to #6. Question: Do the terms above show that Ingrid is overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023697", "pair_id": "u023697-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023697-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "3131513ccb54e77d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023697-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is not pensioned. Folke has no guarantor. Ingrid is indebted. Folke is indebted. Ingrid has a guarantor.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is indebted, it then is vetted. #2 Each time a borrower is indebted, it then is solvent. #3 Each time a borrower is indebted, it then is not vetted. #4 Each time a borrower is pensioned, it then is not solvent. #5 Each time a borrower has a guarantor, it then is overdrawn. #6 Each time a borrower is pensioned, it then is not overdrawn. #3 yields to #1. #2 yields to #4. #5 yields to #6. Question: Do the terms above show that Ingrid is overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023697", "pair_id": "u023697-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023697-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "750576c51d29ee56", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023706-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is not labeled. Thilo is palletized. Liesel is labeled. Thilo is labeled. Rasmus is not registered. Thilo is not registered. Liesel is not registered.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is labeled, it also is weighed. Clause 2: once any parcel has a courier, it also is prepaid. Clause 3: once any parcel is weighed, it also is not prepaid. Clause 4: once any parcel is registered, it also has a courier. Clause 5: once any parcel is palletized, it also is sealed. Question: Does it follow that Liesel is not prepaid?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023706", "pair_id": "u023706-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023706-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "9c339da597732feb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023706-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is not labeled. Thilo is palletized. Liesel is labeled. Thilo is labeled. Rasmus is not registered. Thilo is not registered. Liesel is not registered.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is labeled, it also is weighed. Clause 2: once any parcel has a courier, it also is prepaid. Clause 3: once any parcel is weighed, it also is not prepaid. Clause 4: once any parcel is registered, it also has a courier. Clause 5: once any parcel is palletized, it also is sealed. Clause 6: once any parcel is labeled, it also is not hazardous. Question: Does it follow that Liesel is not prepaid?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023706", "pair_id": "u023706-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023706-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "3d803ccd92e29091", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023719-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not sealed. Quentin is not damaged. Quentin is not tracked.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is fragile, then it is not rerouted. (2) If a parcel is fragile, then it is perishable. (3) If a parcel is damaged, then it is rerouted. (1) is void if the parcel is tracked. When (1) and (3) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Quentin is not sealed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023719", "pair_id": "u023719-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023719-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "91eea336f11ac0c2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023719-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not sealed. Quentin is not damaged. Quentin is not tracked. Quentin is not sealed.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is fragile, then it is not rerouted. (2) If a parcel is fragile, then it is perishable. (3) If a parcel is damaged, then it is rerouted. (1) is void if the parcel is tracked. When (1) and (3) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Quentin is not sealed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023719", "pair_id": "u023719-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023719-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "70169fdbf8c4cc81", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023719-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not sealed. Quentin is not damaged. Quentin is not tracked.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is fragile, it also is not rerouted. Clause 2: once any parcel is fragile, it also is perishable. Clause 3: once any parcel is damaged, it also is rerouted. Clause 1 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is tracked. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Quentin is not sealed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023719", "pair_id": "u023719-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023719-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "91eea336f11ac0c2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023719-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not sealed. Quentin is not damaged. Quentin is not tracked. Quentin is not sealed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is fragile, it also is not rerouted. Clause 2: once any parcel is fragile, it also is perishable. Clause 3: once any parcel is damaged, it also is rerouted. Clause 1 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is tracked. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Quentin is not sealed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023719", "pair_id": "u023719-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023719-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "70169fdbf8c4cc81", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023753-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk has no mortgage. Anouk is a homeowner. Anouk is amortized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has a mortgage, thus it is underwritten. Provision 2: when the borrower here has a lien, thus it is pensioned. Provision 3: when the borrower here is bankrupt, thus it is not employed. Provision 4: when the borrower here is garnished, thus it has an escrow account. Provision 5: when the borrower here is underwritten, thus it is delinquent. Provision 6: when the borrower here is not a homeowner, thus it is not audited. Provision 7: when the borrower here has no mortgage, thus it has a lien. Provision 8: when the borrower here is amortized, thus it has a guarantor. Provision 9: when the borrower here is not bankrupt, thus it is garnished. Provision 10: when the borrower here is not audited, thus it is indebted. Provision 11: when the borrower here is not employed, thus it is foreclosed. Question: Which one describes Anouk?", "options": ["is delinquent", "is foreclosed", "has an escrow account", "is indebted", "is pensioned"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is pensioned", "unit_id": "u023753", "pair_id": "u023753-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023753-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "869dd82c67b346b3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a2", "a3", "a9", "a5"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023753-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk has a mortgage. Anouk is a homeowner. Anouk is amortized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has a mortgage, thus it is underwritten. Provision 2: when the borrower here has a lien, thus it is pensioned. Provision 3: when the borrower here is bankrupt, thus it is not employed. Provision 4: when the borrower here is garnished, thus it has an escrow account. Provision 5: when the borrower here is underwritten, thus it is delinquent. Provision 6: when the borrower here is not a homeowner, thus it is not audited. Provision 7: when the borrower here has no mortgage, thus it has a lien. Provision 8: when the borrower here is amortized, thus it has a guarantor. Provision 9: when the borrower here is not bankrupt, thus it is garnished. Provision 10: when the borrower here is not audited, thus it is indebted. Provision 11: when the borrower here is not employed, thus it is foreclosed. Question: Which one describes Anouk?", "options": ["is delinquent", "is foreclosed", "has an escrow account", "is indebted", "is pensioned"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is delinquent", "unit_id": "u023753", "pair_id": "u023753-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023753-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "514280db049c08b1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a2", "a3", "a9", "a5"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023791-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a CPU quota of 73. Zephyr has a replica count of 2. Orrery is not patched. Orrery is not autoscaled. Sierra has a replica count of 5. Sierra has a CPU quota of 62. Sierra is patched. Orrery has a memory allotment of 93. Zephyr has a memory allotment of 71. Zephyr is patched.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a CPU quota that exceeds 67, so it is throttled. No. 2 While the given workload is containerized, so it has no GPU. No. 3 While the given workload is patched, so it has a snapshot. No. 4 While the given workload is throttled, so it is containerized. No. 5 While the given workload is containerized, so it has a GPU. No. 6 While the given workload is patched, so it is idle. No. 7 While the given workload is patched, so it is backed up. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given workload has a replica count that exceeds 75. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given workload has a memory allotment not above 71. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload is autoscaled. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload is autoscaled. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given workload has a memory allotment that exceeds 71. Question: Is the claim \"Zephyr has a GPU\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023791", "pair_id": "u023791-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023791-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fc6c7314b4fbf77a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u023791-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a CPU quota of 73. Zephyr has a replica count of 2. Orrery is not patched. Orrery is not autoscaled. Sierra has a replica count of 5. Sierra has a CPU quota of 62. Sierra is patched. Orrery has a memory allotment of 93. Zephyr has a memory allotment of 77. Zephyr is patched.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a CPU quota that exceeds 67, so it is throttled. No. 2 While the given workload is containerized, so it has no GPU. No. 3 While the given workload is patched, so it has a snapshot. No. 4 While the given workload is throttled, so it is containerized. No. 5 While the given workload is containerized, so it has a GPU. No. 6 While the given workload is patched, so it is idle. No. 7 While the given workload is patched, so it is backed up. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given workload has a replica count that exceeds 75. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given workload has a memory allotment not above 71. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given workload is autoscaled. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload is autoscaled. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given workload has a memory allotment that exceeds 71. Question: Is the claim \"Zephyr has a GPU\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023791", "pair_id": "u023791-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023791-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "427b88564da594cd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u023798-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile is labeled. Liesel is not consolidated. Odile is not consolidated. Liesel has no barcode. Liesel is rerouted. Kaveh is not sealed. Liesel is stamped. Kaveh is not refrigerated. Liesel is not sealed. Kaveh is not stamped. Odile is scanned. Priya has a locker slot. Liesel has no locker slot. Priya is not refrigerated. Priya is not rerouted. Liesel is not scanned. Liesel is labeled. Priya is not sealed. Kaveh is not labeled. Odile is sealed. Liesel is not oversized.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is hazardous and is rerouted, then it is weighed. (2) If a parcel is hazardous, then it is palletized. (3) If a parcel is rerouted, then it is not prepaid. (4) If a parcel is stamped and is not consolidated and has a locker slot, then it is prepaid. (5) If a parcel is refrigerated and is not labeled and is oversized, then it is undeliverable. (6) If a parcel is not oversized and is not scanned, then it is registered. (7) If a parcel is hazardous and is not rerouted, then it is not weighed. (8) If a parcel is stamped and is rerouted and is oversized, then it is not registered. (9) If a parcel is sealed, then it is not palletized. (10) If a parcel is not registered and is not sealed, then it is hazardous. (4) is void if the parcel is refrigerated. (7) is void if the parcel is not stamped and is sealed. (8) is void if the parcel has no barcode and is rerouted. (2) is void if the parcel has a locker slot. When (3) and (4) clash, (3) prevails. When (6) and (8) clash, (6) prevails. When (1) and (7) clash, (1) prevails. When (9) and (2) clash, (9) prevails. Question: Is it true that Liesel is weighed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023798", "pair_id": "u023798-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023798-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9a2381e97bda5ed7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u023798-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile is labeled. Liesel is not consolidated. Odile is not consolidated. Liesel has no barcode. Liesel is rerouted. Kaveh is not sealed. Liesel is stamped. Kaveh is not refrigerated. Liesel is not sealed. Kaveh is not stamped. Odile is scanned. Priya has a locker slot. Liesel has no locker slot. Priya is not refrigerated. Priya is not rerouted. Liesel is not scanned. Liesel is labeled. Priya is not sealed. Kaveh is not labeled. Odile is sealed. Liesel is not oversized.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is hazardous and is rerouted, then it is weighed. (2) If a parcel is hazardous, then it is palletized. (3) If a parcel is rerouted, then it is not prepaid. (4) If a parcel is stamped and is not consolidated and has a locker slot, then it is prepaid. (5) If a parcel is refrigerated and is not labeled and is oversized, then it is undeliverable. (6) If a parcel is not oversized and is not scanned, then it is registered. (7) If a parcel is hazardous and is not rerouted, then it is not weighed. (8) If a parcel is stamped and is rerouted and is oversized, then it is not registered. (9) If a parcel is sealed, then it is not palletized. (10) If a parcel is registered and is not sealed, then it is hazardous. (4) is void if the parcel is refrigerated. (7) is void if the parcel is not stamped and is sealed. (8) is void if the parcel has no barcode and is rerouted. (2) is void if the parcel has a locker slot. When (3) and (4) clash, (3) prevails. When (6) and (8) clash, (6) prevails. When (1) and (7) clash, (1) prevails. When (9) and (2) clash, (9) prevails. Question: Is it true that Liesel is weighed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023798", "pair_id": "u023798-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/9/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023798-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c8d1057af85eb05d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u023800-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela is not scanned. Mirela is not sealed. Mirela is perishable. Mirela is stamped. Mirela has a courier.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is not damaged, thus it is hazardous. Provision 2: when the parcel here is perishable, thus it is not fragile. Provision 3: when the parcel here is hazardous while is stamped while is scanned, thus it is not refrigerated. Provision 4: when the parcel here is hazardous while has a courier while is delayed, thus it is refrigerated. Provision 5: when the parcel here has a waybill while is weighed, thus it is registered. Provision 6: when the parcel here is sealed while is delayed while is weighed, thus it is palletized. Provision 7: when the parcel here is stamped, thus it is damaged. Provision 6 has no effect when the parcel here is scanned. Provision 7 has no effect when the parcel here has a waybill while is scanned. Question: Would it be right to say that Mirela is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023800", "pair_id": "u023800-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023800-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "60dc8e22989d909d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u023800-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela is not scanned. Mirela is not sealed. Mirela is perishable. Mirela is stamped. Mirela has a courier.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is damaged, thus it is hazardous. Provision 2: when the parcel here is perishable, thus it is not fragile. Provision 3: when the parcel here is hazardous while is stamped while is scanned, thus it is not refrigerated. Provision 4: when the parcel here is hazardous while has a courier while is delayed, thus it is refrigerated. Provision 5: when the parcel here has a waybill while is weighed, thus it is registered. Provision 6: when the parcel here is sealed while is delayed while is weighed, thus it is palletized. Provision 7: when the parcel here is stamped, thus it is damaged. Provision 6 has no effect when the parcel here is scanned. Provision 7 has no effect when the parcel here has a waybill while is scanned. Question: Would it be right to say that Mirela is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023800", "pair_id": "u023800-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023800-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7602cb4da19edb83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u023800-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela is not scanned. Mirela is not sealed. Mirela is perishable. Mirela is stamped. Mirela has a courier.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not damaged, it thereby is hazardous. Point B. If said parcel is perishable, it thereby is not fragile. Point C. If said parcel is hazardous and further is stamped and further is scanned, it thereby is not refrigerated. Point D. If said parcel is hazardous and further has a courier and further is delayed, it thereby is refrigerated. Point E. If said parcel has a waybill and further is weighed, it thereby is registered. Point F. If said parcel is sealed and further is delayed and further is weighed, it thereby is palletized. Point G. If said parcel is stamped, it thereby is damaged. Point F is cancelled if said parcel is scanned. Point G is cancelled if said parcel has a waybill and further is scanned. Question: Statement: Mirela is refrigerated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023800", "pair_id": "u023800-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023800-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "60dc8e22989d909d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u023800-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela is not scanned. Mirela is not sealed. Mirela is perishable. Mirela is stamped. Mirela has a courier.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is damaged, it thereby is hazardous. Point B. If said parcel is perishable, it thereby is not fragile. Point C. If said parcel is hazardous and further is stamped and further is scanned, it thereby is not refrigerated. Point D. If said parcel is hazardous and further has a courier and further is delayed, it thereby is refrigerated. Point E. If said parcel has a waybill and further is weighed, it thereby is registered. Point F. If said parcel is sealed and further is delayed and further is weighed, it thereby is palletized. Point G. If said parcel is stamped, it thereby is damaged. Point F is cancelled if said parcel is scanned. Point G is cancelled if said parcel has a waybill and further is scanned. Question: Statement: Mirela is refrigerated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023800", "pair_id": "u023800-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023800-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7602cb4da19edb83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u023842-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not multicenter. Kochab is resubmitted. Kochab has a citation index of 47. Kochab has a review mark of 54.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a citation index of at least 44, then it is exploratory. (2) If a proposal is resubmitted, then it is longitudinal. (3) If a proposal has no ethics clearance, then it is not a pilot study. (4) If a proposal is exploratory, then it has no ethics clearance. (5) If a proposal has no ethics clearance, then it is a pilot study. (3) is void if the proposal is not multicenter. (5) is void if the proposal is multicenter. (2) is void if the proposal is not multicenter. (1) is void if the proposal has a review mark of at most 52. Question: Is it true that Kochab is a pilot study?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023842", "pair_id": "u023842-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023842-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "91f9f78c73299733", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u023842-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is multicenter. Kochab is resubmitted. Kochab has a citation index of 47. Kochab has a review mark of 54.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a citation index of at least 44, then it is exploratory. (2) If a proposal is resubmitted, then it is longitudinal. (3) If a proposal has no ethics clearance, then it is not a pilot study. (4) If a proposal is exploratory, then it has no ethics clearance. (5) If a proposal has no ethics clearance, then it is a pilot study. (3) is void if the proposal is not multicenter. (5) is void if the proposal is multicenter. (2) is void if the proposal is not multicenter. (1) is void if the proposal has a review mark of at most 52. Question: Is it true that Kochab is a pilot study?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023842", "pair_id": "u023842-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023842-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e4f3559ea5c9eb81", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u023842-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not multicenter. Kochab is resubmitted. Kochab has a citation index of 47. Kochab has a review mark of 54.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has a citation index of no less than 44, that proposal is exploratory. Item B. When the proposal is resubmitted, that proposal is longitudinal. Item C. When the proposal has no ethics clearance, that proposal is not a pilot study. Item D. When the proposal is exploratory, that proposal has no ethics clearance. Item E. When the proposal has no ethics clearance, that proposal is a pilot study. Item C is suspended when the proposal is not multicenter. Item E is suspended when the proposal is multicenter. Item B is suspended when the proposal is not multicenter. Item A is suspended when the proposal has a review mark of no more than 52. Question: Can one infer that Kochab is a pilot study?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023842", "pair_id": "u023842-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023842-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "91f9f78c73299733", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u023842-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is multicenter. Kochab is resubmitted. Kochab has a citation index of 47. Kochab has a review mark of 54.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has a citation index of no less than 44, that proposal is exploratory. Item B. When the proposal is resubmitted, that proposal is longitudinal. Item C. When the proposal has no ethics clearance, that proposal is not a pilot study. Item D. When the proposal is exploratory, that proposal has no ethics clearance. Item E. When the proposal has no ethics clearance, that proposal is a pilot study. Item C is suspended when the proposal is not multicenter. Item E is suspended when the proposal is multicenter. Item B is suspended when the proposal is not multicenter. Item A is suspended when the proposal has a review mark of no more than 52. Question: Can one infer that Kochab is a pilot study?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023842", "pair_id": "u023842-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023842-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e4f3559ea5c9eb81", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u023846-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is not ambulatory. Wendel is not asthmatic. Wendel is waitlisted. Cosima has a pulse rate of 49. Yusuf is ambulatory. Cosima is not asthmatic. Wendel has a pulse rate of 82. Yusuf is waitlisted. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Cosima is ambulatory. Wendel is ambulatory. Wendel has a mobility rank of 60. Wendel is not rescheduled. Dorian has a pulse rate of 62.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has a pulse rate of maximum 26, it thereby is anemic. Point B. If said patient is vaccinated, it thereby is postoperative. Point C. If said patient is waitlisted, it thereby is triaged. Point D. If said patient is ambulatory, it thereby is admitted. Point E. If said patient is diabetic, it thereby is not postoperative. Point F. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is hypertensive. Point G. If said patient is not ambulatory, it thereby is not admitted. Point H. If said patient is anemic, it thereby is bedridden. Point I. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is not anemic. Point J. If said patient has a mobility rank short of 46, it thereby is vaccinated. Point K. If said patient is postoperative, it thereby is not hypertensive. Point L. If said patient is asthmatic, it thereby is diabetic. Point I supersedes Point A. Point F supersedes Point K. Point G supersedes Point D. Point E supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Wendel is hypertensive. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023846", "pair_id": "u023846-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023846-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f137e8933ff97521", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023846-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian is not ambulatory. Wendel is not asthmatic. Wendel is waitlisted. Cosima has a pulse rate of 49. Yusuf is ambulatory. Cosima is not asthmatic. Wendel has a pulse rate of 82. Yusuf is waitlisted. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Cosima is ambulatory. Wendel is ambulatory. Wendel has a mobility rank of 60. Wendel is not rescheduled. Dorian has a pulse rate of 62.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has a pulse rate of maximum 26, it thereby is anemic. Point B. If said patient is vaccinated, it thereby is postoperative. Point C. If said patient is waitlisted, it thereby is triaged. Point D. If said patient is ambulatory, it thereby is admitted. Point E. If said patient is diabetic, it thereby is not postoperative. Point F. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is hypertensive. Point G. If said patient is ambulatory, it thereby is not admitted. Point H. If said patient is anemic, it thereby is bedridden. Point I. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is not anemic. Point J. If said patient has a mobility rank short of 46, it thereby is vaccinated. Point K. If said patient is postoperative, it thereby is not hypertensive. Point L. If said patient is asthmatic, it thereby is diabetic. Point I supersedes Point A. Point F supersedes Point K. Point G supersedes Point D. Point E supersedes Point B. Question: Statement: Wendel is hypertensive. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023846", "pair_id": "u023846-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023846-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a5b3cc100f47a72d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023852-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mica has no feature toggle. Mica is reproducible. Basalt is not minified. Mica has no changelog. Zircon is reverted. Basalt has a security advisory. Zircon is not profiled. Zircon is not reproducible. Basalt is localized. Talc is not signed. Basalt is reproducible. Basalt is not profiled. Zircon has a changelog. Zircon is linted. Talc is not reverted. Basalt is linted. Basalt is not merged. Zircon is minified. Basalt has no migration script. Talc is merged. Talc is flaky. Mica is profiled. Talc is minified. Basalt is reverted. Zircon has no security advisory. Basalt has no changelog. Talc is not localized. Talc is linted. Basalt is flaky.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is localized while is merged, thus it is notarized. Provision 2: when the build here is localized while is reverted while is merged, thus it is backported. Provision 3: when the build here is localized while has a feature toggle, thus it is fuzzed. Provision 4: when the build here is localized, thus it is tested. Provision 5: when the build here is localized while has a migration script, thus it is obsolete. Provision 6: when the build here is reproducible, thus it is not tested. Provision 7: when the build here is localized while is flaky while is profiled, thus it is benchmarked. Provision 8: when the build here is reverted, thus it is not benchmarked. Provision 9: when the build here is localized while is signed while has a security advisory, thus it is compiled. Provision 10: when the build here is localized while has a changelog while is merged, thus it is tagged. Provision 11: when the build here is localized while is linted while is reverted, thus it is versioned. Provision 10 has no effect when the build here is signed. Provision 6 has no effect when the build here is minified. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here is merged. Provision 11 has no effect when the build here has a migration script. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Basalt?", "options": ["is notarized", "is compiled", "is obsolete", "is versioned", "is tagged", "is fuzzed", "is backported", "is benchmarked"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is versioned", "unit_id": "u023852", "pair_id": "u023852-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023852-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "28919da30cf608ad", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a11", "a15", "a10", "a4", "a13", "a14", "a21"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u023852-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mica has no feature toggle. Mica is reproducible. Basalt is minified. Mica has no changelog. Zircon is reverted. Basalt has a security advisory. Zircon is not profiled. Zircon is not reproducible. Basalt is localized. Talc is not signed. Basalt is reproducible. Basalt is not profiled. Zircon has a changelog. Zircon is linted. Talc is not reverted. Basalt is linted. Basalt is not merged. Zircon is minified. Basalt has no migration script. Talc is merged. Talc is flaky. Mica is profiled. Talc is minified. Basalt is reverted. Zircon has no security advisory. Basalt has no changelog. Talc is not localized. Talc is linted. Basalt is flaky.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is localized while is merged, thus it is notarized. Provision 2: when the build here is localized while is reverted while is merged, thus it is backported. Provision 3: when the build here is localized while has a feature toggle, thus it is fuzzed. Provision 4: when the build here is localized, thus it is tested. Provision 5: when the build here is localized while has a migration script, thus it is obsolete. Provision 6: when the build here is reproducible, thus it is not tested. Provision 7: when the build here is localized while is flaky while is profiled, thus it is benchmarked. Provision 8: when the build here is reverted, thus it is not benchmarked. Provision 9: when the build here is localized while is signed while has a security advisory, thus it is compiled. Provision 10: when the build here is localized while has a changelog while is merged, thus it is tagged. Provision 11: when the build here is localized while is linted while is reverted, thus it is versioned. Provision 10 has no effect when the build here is signed. Provision 6 has no effect when the build here is minified. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here is merged. Provision 11 has no effect when the build here has a migration script. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Basalt?", "options": ["is notarized", "is compiled", "is obsolete", "is versioned", "is tagged", "is fuzzed", "is backported", "is benchmarked"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is versioned", "unit_id": "u023852", "pair_id": "u023852-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023852-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ae813154512ee0bf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a11", "a15", "a10", "a4", "a13", "a14", "a21"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u023888-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is not budgeted. Nashira is not peer reviewed. Electra has a citation index of 20. Electra is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is interdisciplinary: then it has no industry backing. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is not interdisciplinary: then it is theoretical. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is not budgeted: then it is not exploratory. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is interdisciplinary: then it has industry backing. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is not longitudinal: then it is interdisciplinary. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has a citation index no higher than 23: then it is longitudinal. Policy IV is waived if that proposal is peer reviewed. Policy I is waived if that proposal is not embargoed. Policy I is waived if that proposal is not peer reviewed. Question: Is it so that Electra has industry backing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023888", "pair_id": "u023888-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023888-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "436ccfe2cd94feb3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023888-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is not budgeted. Nashira is not peer reviewed. Electra has a citation index of 20. Electra is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is interdisciplinary: then it has no industry backing. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is not interdisciplinary: then it is theoretical. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is not budgeted: then it is not exploratory. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is interdisciplinary: then it has industry backing. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is longitudinal: then it is interdisciplinary. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has a citation index no higher than 23: then it is longitudinal. Policy IV is waived if that proposal is peer reviewed. Policy I is waived if that proposal is not embargoed. Policy I is waived if that proposal is not peer reviewed. Question: Is it so that Electra has industry backing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023888", "pair_id": "u023888-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023888-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "72926cf5f2dbc89b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023888-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is not budgeted. Nashira is not peer reviewed. Electra has a citation index of 20. Electra is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is interdisciplinary, it then has no industry backing. #2 Each time a proposal is not interdisciplinary, it then is theoretical. #3 Each time a proposal is not budgeted, it then is not exploratory. #4 Each time a proposal is interdisciplinary, it then has industry backing. #5 Each time a proposal is not longitudinal, it then is interdisciplinary. #6 Each time a proposal has a citation index of 23 or below, it then is longitudinal. #4 is set aside if a proposal is peer reviewed. #1 is set aside if a proposal is not embargoed. #1 is set aside if a proposal is not peer reviewed. Question: Do the terms above show that Electra has industry backing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023888", "pair_id": "u023888-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023888-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "436ccfe2cd94feb3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023888-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is not budgeted. Nashira is not peer reviewed. Electra has a citation index of 20. Electra is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is interdisciplinary, it then has no industry backing. #2 Each time a proposal is not interdisciplinary, it then is theoretical. #3 Each time a proposal is not budgeted, it then is not exploratory. #4 Each time a proposal is interdisciplinary, it then has industry backing. #5 Each time a proposal is longitudinal, it then is interdisciplinary. #6 Each time a proposal has a citation index of 23 or below, it then is longitudinal. #4 is set aside if a proposal is peer reviewed. #1 is set aside if a proposal is not embargoed. #1 is set aside if a proposal is not peer reviewed. Question: Do the terms above show that Electra has industry backing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023888", "pair_id": "u023888-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023888-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "72926cf5f2dbc89b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u023894-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste has a beneficiary. Celeste is indemnified. Celeste is uninsurable. Celeste is not inspected. Celeste has no adjuster. Celeste is not a claimant.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is not inspected: then it has no roadside assistance. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is not reinstated plus is uninsurable plus has no roadside assistance: then it is not bundled. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster plus is a smoker plus is inspected: then it has a dashcam. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is inspected plus is a smoker: then it is reinstated. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is not reinstated plus is not uninsurable: then it is bundled. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder has no rider: then it is grandfathered. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder is not a claimant: then it has no rider. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder is a claimant plus is indemnified: then it has a deductible waiver. Policy IX. Suppose that policyholder is not appraised: then it has no deductible waiver. Policy X. Suppose that policyholder has no rider: then it is not reinstated. Policy VI is waived if that policyholder is a smoker. Policy V is waived if that policyholder is a smoker plus is not inspected. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy IV. Question: Is it so that Celeste is not bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023894", "pair_id": "u023894-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023894-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9de67354444c52d3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u023894-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Celeste has a beneficiary. Celeste is indemnified. Celeste is not appraised. Celeste is uninsurable. Celeste is not inspected. Celeste has no adjuster. Celeste is not a claimant.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is not inspected: then it has no roadside assistance. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is not reinstated plus is uninsurable plus has no roadside assistance: then it is not bundled. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster plus is a smoker plus is inspected: then it has a dashcam. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is inspected plus is a smoker: then it is reinstated. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is not reinstated plus is not uninsurable: then it is bundled. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder has no rider: then it is grandfathered. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder is not a claimant: then it has no rider. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder is a claimant plus is indemnified: then it has a deductible waiver. Policy IX. Suppose that policyholder is not appraised: then it has no deductible waiver. Policy X. Suppose that policyholder has no rider: then it is not reinstated. Policy VI is waived if that policyholder is a smoker. Policy V is waived if that policyholder is a smoker plus is not inspected. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy IV. Question: Is it so that Celeste is not bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023894", "pair_id": "u023894-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023894-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9ceeefd75dfa423d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u023917-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is not a pilot study. Gemma is not a pilot study. Kochab has a milestone total of 37. Gemma is cofunded. Izar is cofunded. Kochab is not cofunded. Nashira has a milestone total of 24.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is collaborative. Item B. When the proposal has a milestone total of no less than 38, that proposal has a postdoc. Item C. When the proposal has a postdoc, that proposal is not preregistered. Item D. When the proposal is a pilot study, that proposal is peer reviewed. Item E. When the proposal is collaborative, that proposal is preregistered. Question: Can one infer that Nashira is preregistered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023917", "pair_id": "u023917-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023917-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "bdccd7833503ec43", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023917-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is not a pilot study. Gemma is not a pilot study. Kochab has a milestone total of 37. Gemma is cofunded. Izar is cofunded. Kochab is not cofunded. Nashira has a milestone total of 24.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is collaborative. Item B. When the proposal has a milestone total of no less than 29, that proposal has a postdoc. Item C. When the proposal has a postdoc, that proposal is not preregistered. Item D. When the proposal is a pilot study, that proposal is peer reviewed. Item E. When the proposal is collaborative, that proposal is preregistered. Question: Can one infer that Nashira is preregistered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023917", "pair_id": "u023917-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u023917-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "5d6a38abb10e8a24", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u023922-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut has a citation index of 31. Fomalhaut is not budgeted. Fomalhaut has a milestone total of 38. Hadar is not budgeted. Hadar has a patent filing. Hadar is not a pilot study. Hadar is not embargoed. Fomalhaut has a team size of 65. Hadar has a citation index of 18. Fomalhaut is not a pilot study. Fomalhaut has a review mark of 89. Fomalhaut is peer reviewed. Fomalhaut is renewed. Fomalhaut is embargoed. Fomalhaut has no ethics clearance. Hadar is not peer reviewed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a citation index that falls below 12, so it is not preregistered. No. 2 While the given proposal has seed funding and likewise has a team size not above 76, so it is not shortlisted. No. 3 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is not exploratory. No. 4 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is peer reviewed, so it is exploratory. No. 5 While the given proposal has seed funding and likewise has a team size not above 76 and likewise is interdisciplinary, so it is shortlisted. No. 6 While the given proposal has a review mark that exceeds 50 and likewise is renewed, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 7 While the given proposal is preregistered, so it has seed funding. No. 8 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is preregistered. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal is a pilot study and likewise has ethics clearance. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given proposal is peer reviewed and likewise is budgeted. No. 8 wins over No. 1. No. 3 wins over No. 4. No. 2 wins over No. 5. Question: Is the claim \"Fomalhaut is not shortlisted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023922", "pair_id": "u023922-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023922-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "73babb9aa8fdf0e7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u023922-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut has a citation index of 31. Fomalhaut is not budgeted. Fomalhaut has a milestone total of 38. Hadar is not budgeted. Hadar has a patent filing. Hadar is not a pilot study. Hadar is not embargoed. Fomalhaut has a team size of 65. Hadar has a citation index of 18. Fomalhaut is not a pilot study. Fomalhaut has a review mark of 89. Fomalhaut is peer reviewed. Fomalhaut is renewed. Fomalhaut is embargoed. Fomalhaut has no ethics clearance. Hadar is not peer reviewed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a citation index that falls below 12, so it is not preregistered. No. 2 While the given proposal has seed funding and likewise has a team size that exceeds 76, so it is not shortlisted. No. 3 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is not exploratory. No. 4 While the given proposal has a patent filing and likewise is peer reviewed, so it is exploratory. No. 5 While the given proposal has seed funding and likewise has a team size not above 76 and likewise is interdisciplinary, so it is shortlisted. No. 6 While the given proposal has a review mark that exceeds 50 and likewise is renewed, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 7 While the given proposal is preregistered, so it has seed funding. No. 8 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is preregistered. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal is a pilot study and likewise has ethics clearance. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given proposal is peer reviewed and likewise is budgeted. No. 8 wins over No. 1. No. 3 wins over No. 4. No. 2 wins over No. 5. Question: Is the claim \"Fomalhaut is not shortlisted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023922", "pair_id": "u023922-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023922-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "18f2464db0df8670", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u023975-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach is not collaborative. Betelgeuse is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse is not collaborative. Hadar is collaborative. Mirach is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse has no postdoc. Aldebaran is not collaborative. Aldebaran is not peer reviewed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is endorsed, it then is embargoed. #2 Each time a proposal is shortlisted, it then has ethics clearance. #3 Each time a proposal has industry backing, it then is shortlisted. #4 Each time a proposal is embargoed, it then has no ethics clearance. #5 Each time a proposal has no postdoc, it then has industry backing. #6 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then is not translational. #7 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then is endorsed. Question: Do the terms above show that Betelgeuse has ethics clearance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u023975", "pair_id": "u023975-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023975-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "f4c675ce4fbe96b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u023975-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach is not collaborative. Betelgeuse is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse is not collaborative. Hadar is collaborative. Mirach is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse has no postdoc. Aldebaran is not collaborative. Aldebaran is not peer reviewed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is endorsed, it then is embargoed. #2 Each time a proposal is shortlisted, it then has ethics clearance. #3 Each time a proposal has industry backing, it then is shortlisted. #4 Each time a proposal is embargoed, it then has no ethics clearance. #5 Each time a proposal has a postdoc, it then has industry backing. #6 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then is not translational. #7 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then is endorsed. Question: Do the terms above show that Betelgeuse has ethics clearance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023975", "pair_id": "u023975-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023975-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "3318f10a77a8aaae", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u023987-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is isolated. Juno has no dedicated host. Cobalt is not patched. Tundra is sharded. Borealis is not patched. Tundra is throttled. Cobalt is not isolated. Juno is not deprecated. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 84. Juno is sharded. Juno is not throttled. Cobalt is not sharded. Juno is not patched. Juno has a memory allotment of 83. Cobalt is not throttled. Tundra has a memory allotment of 18. Tundra is not patched.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a dedicated host, thus it has a failover node. Provision 2: when the workload here is not throttled while is isolated while has a memory allotment beyond 29, thus it has no firewall. Provision 3: when the workload here is not deprecated while is sharded, thus it is not backed up. Provision 4: when the workload here is not backed up, thus it is mirrored. Provision 5: when the workload here has a memory allotment at or above 17, thus it is sandboxed. Provision 6: when the workload here is mirrored while is patched, thus it is monitored. Provision 7: when the workload here is not mirrored while is not patched while has no firewall, thus it is not monitored. Question: Would it be right to say that Juno is monitored?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023987", "pair_id": "u023987-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023987-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "670d415a7da1dfbd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u023987-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is isolated. Juno has no dedicated host. Cobalt is not patched. Tundra is sharded. Borealis is not patched. Tundra is throttled. Cobalt is not isolated. Juno is not deprecated. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 84. Juno is sharded. Juno is not throttled. Cobalt is not sharded. Juno is not patched. Juno has a memory allotment of 83. Cobalt is not throttled. Tundra has a memory allotment of 18. Tundra is not patched.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a dedicated host, thus it has a failover node. Provision 2: when the workload here is not throttled while is isolated while has a memory allotment beyond 29, thus it has no firewall. Provision 3: when the workload here is not deprecated while is sharded, thus it is not backed up. Provision 4: when the workload here is not backed up, thus it is mirrored. Provision 5: when the workload here has a memory allotment at or above 17, thus it is sandboxed. Provision 6: when the workload here is mirrored while is patched, thus it is monitored. Provision 7: when the workload here is mirrored while is not patched while has no firewall, thus it is not monitored. Question: Would it be right to say that Juno is monitored?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023987", "pair_id": "u023987-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023987-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "9d406f37a9753ede", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u023987-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is isolated. Juno has no dedicated host. Cobalt is not patched. Tundra is sharded. Borealis is not patched. Tundra is throttled. Cobalt is not isolated. Juno is not deprecated. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 84. Juno is sharded. Juno is not throttled. Cobalt is not sharded. Juno is not patched. Juno has a memory allotment of 83. Cobalt is not throttled. Tundra has a memory allotment of 18. Tundra is not patched.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a dedicated host, so it has a failover node. No. 2 While the given workload is not throttled and likewise is isolated and likewise has a memory allotment that exceeds 29, so it has no firewall. No. 3 While the given workload is not deprecated and likewise is sharded, so it is not backed up. No. 4 While the given workload is not backed up, so it is mirrored. No. 5 While the given workload has a memory allotment not below 17, so it is sandboxed. No. 6 While the given workload is mirrored and likewise is patched, so it is monitored. No. 7 While the given workload is not mirrored and likewise is not patched and likewise has no firewall, so it is not monitored. Question: Is the claim \"Juno is monitored\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u023987", "pair_id": "u023987-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023987-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "670d415a7da1dfbd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u023987-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is isolated. Juno has no dedicated host. Cobalt is not patched. Tundra is sharded. Borealis is not patched. Tundra is throttled. Cobalt is not isolated. Juno is not deprecated. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 84. Juno is sharded. Juno is not throttled. Cobalt is not sharded. Juno is not patched. Juno has a memory allotment of 83. Cobalt is not throttled. Tundra has a memory allotment of 18. Tundra is not patched.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a dedicated host, so it has a failover node. No. 2 While the given workload is not throttled and likewise is isolated and likewise has a memory allotment that exceeds 29, so it has no firewall. No. 3 While the given workload is not deprecated and likewise is sharded, so it is not backed up. No. 4 While the given workload is not backed up, so it is mirrored. No. 5 While the given workload has a memory allotment not below 17, so it is sandboxed. No. 6 While the given workload is mirrored and likewise is patched, so it is monitored. No. 7 While the given workload is mirrored and likewise is not patched and likewise has no firewall, so it is not monitored. Question: Is the claim \"Juno is monitored\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u023987", "pair_id": "u023987-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u023987-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "9d406f37a9753ede", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024029-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is bilingual. Lotte is a graduate. Lotte is bilingual. Hedda is bilingual. Hedda is a graduate.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is eligible, then it has a diploma. (2) If a candidate is eligible, then it is unionized. (3) If a candidate is sponsored, then it is bonded. (4) If a candidate has a portfolio, then it is seasoned. (5) If a candidate is a graduate, then it is licensed. (6) If a candidate is not a graduate, then it is sponsored. (7) If a candidate is seasoned, then it is eligible. (8) If a candidate is bonded, then it is not unionized. (9) If a candidate is bilingual, then it is relocating. Question: Is it true that Lotte is unionized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024029", "pair_id": "u024029-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024029-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "4a0ac9e9668bbe5b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024029-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is bilingual. Lotte is a graduate. Lotte is bilingual. Hedda is bilingual. Hedda is a graduate.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is eligible, then it has a diploma. (2) If a candidate is eligible, then it is unionized. (3) If a candidate is sponsored, then it is bonded. (4) If a candidate has a portfolio, then it is seasoned. (5) If a candidate is a graduate, then it is licensed. (6) If a candidate is not a graduate, then it is sponsored. (7) If a candidate is seasoned, then it is eligible. (8) If a candidate is bonded, then it is not unionized. (9) If a candidate is not bilingual, then it is relocating. Question: Is it true that Lotte is unionized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024029", "pair_id": "u024029-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024029-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "f2d82001befbea8a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024053-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not licensed. Olek is not bilingual. Olek is relocating. Ivo is relocating. Noor is not licensed. Sigrid is relocating. Ivo is bilingual. Sigrid is not licensed. Noor is bilingual. Sigrid is seasoned. Noor is not relocating.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not a graduate provided that it is not relocating. Section 2: a candidate has a background screening provided that it is licensed. Section 3: a candidate has a visa provided that it has a background screening as well as is seasoned as well as is licensed. Section 4: a candidate is recommended provided that it is bilingual as well as is licensed. Section 5: a candidate has no visa provided that it has a background screening as well as is not seasoned as well as is licensed. Question: Sigrid has no visa. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024053", "pair_id": "u024053-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024053-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "0e5207ce836458b4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u024053-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not licensed. Olek is not bilingual. Olek is relocating. Ivo is relocating. Noor is not licensed. Sigrid is not relocating. Ivo is bilingual. Sigrid is not licensed. Noor is bilingual. Sigrid is seasoned. Noor is not relocating.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not a graduate provided that it is not relocating. Section 2: a candidate has a background screening provided that it is licensed. Section 3: a candidate has a visa provided that it has a background screening as well as is seasoned as well as is licensed. Section 4: a candidate is recommended provided that it is bilingual as well as is licensed. Section 5: a candidate has no visa provided that it has a background screening as well as is not seasoned as well as is licensed. Question: Sigrid has no visa. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024053", "pair_id": "u024053-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024053-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "8a7303fb1fefb0d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u024053-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not licensed. Olek is not bilingual. Olek is relocating. Ivo is relocating. Noor is not licensed. Sigrid is relocating. Ivo is bilingual. Sigrid is not licensed. Noor is bilingual. Sigrid is seasoned. Noor is not relocating.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is not relocating: then it is not a graduate. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is licensed: then it has a background screening. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus is seasoned plus is licensed: then it has a visa. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is bilingual plus is licensed: then it is recommended. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus is not seasoned plus is licensed: then it has no visa. Question: Is it so that Sigrid has no visa?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024053", "pair_id": "u024053-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024053-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "0e5207ce836458b4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u024053-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not licensed. Olek is not bilingual. Olek is relocating. Ivo is relocating. Noor is not licensed. Sigrid is not relocating. Ivo is bilingual. Sigrid is not licensed. Noor is bilingual. Sigrid is seasoned. Noor is not relocating.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is not relocating: then it is not a graduate. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is licensed: then it has a background screening. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus is seasoned plus is licensed: then it has a visa. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is bilingual plus is licensed: then it is recommended. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus is not seasoned plus is licensed: then it has no visa. Question: Is it so that Sigrid has no visa?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024053", "pair_id": "u024053-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024053-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "8a7303fb1fefb0d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u024078-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not refrigerated. Saskia is not misrouted. Saskia has a postal zone of 52.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is stamped provided that it is misrouted. Section 2: a parcel is perishable provided that it is refrigerated. Section 3: a parcel is not stamped provided that it has a postal zone lower than 32. Section 4: a parcel is consolidated provided that it is refrigerated. Question: Saskia is not stamped. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024078", "pair_id": "u024078-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024078-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "adbf62775a28971c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024078-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not refrigerated. Saskia is not misrouted. Saskia has a postal zone of 52.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is stamped provided that it is misrouted. Section 2: a parcel is perishable provided that it is refrigerated. Section 3: a parcel is not stamped provided that it has a postal zone of 32 or higher. Section 4: a parcel is consolidated provided that it is refrigerated. Question: Saskia is not stamped. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024078", "pair_id": "u024078-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024078-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "2a8c5518cee3122f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024083-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is seasoned. Sigrid is not licensed. Sigrid is not seasoned.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is licensed, it thereby has a portfolio. Point B. If said candidate is a veteran, it thereby has no background screening. Point C. If said candidate is not licensed, it thereby is certified. Point D. If said candidate is seasoned, it thereby is probationary. Point E. If said candidate is certified, it thereby has a signing bonus. Point F. If said candidate has a signing bonus, it thereby has a background screening. Point G. If said candidate has a portfolio, it thereby is a veteran. Point H. If said candidate is not seasoned, it thereby is headhunted. Question: Statement: Sigrid has a background screening. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024083", "pair_id": "u024083-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024083-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "c719cf94aa6b42f7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024083-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is seasoned. Sigrid is not licensed. Sigrid is not seasoned.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is licensed, it thereby has a portfolio. Point B. If said candidate is a veteran, it thereby has no background screening. Point C. If said candidate is not licensed, it thereby is certified. Point D. If said candidate is seasoned, it thereby is probationary. Point E. If said candidate is certified, it thereby has a signing bonus. Point F. If said candidate has a signing bonus, it thereby has a background screening. Point G. If said candidate has a portfolio, it thereby is a veteran. Point H. If said candidate is seasoned, it thereby is headhunted. Question: Statement: Sigrid has a background screening. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024083", "pair_id": "u024083-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024083-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "1ac6d044b3a7ebd8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024083-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is seasoned. Sigrid is not licensed. Sigrid is not seasoned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is licensed, so it has a portfolio. No. 2 While the given candidate is a veteran, so it has no background screening. No. 3 While the given candidate is not licensed, so it is certified. No. 4 While the given candidate is seasoned, so it is probationary. No. 5 While the given candidate is certified, so it has a signing bonus. No. 6 While the given candidate has a signing bonus, so it has a background screening. No. 7 While the given candidate has a portfolio, so it is a veteran. No. 8 While the given candidate is not seasoned, so it is headhunted. Question: Is the claim \"Sigrid has a background screening\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024083", "pair_id": "u024083-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024083-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "c719cf94aa6b42f7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024083-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is seasoned. Sigrid is not licensed. Sigrid is not seasoned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is licensed, so it has a portfolio. No. 2 While the given candidate is a veteran, so it has no background screening. No. 3 While the given candidate is not licensed, so it is certified. No. 4 While the given candidate is seasoned, so it is probationary. No. 5 While the given candidate is certified, so it has a signing bonus. No. 6 While the given candidate has a signing bonus, so it has a background screening. No. 7 While the given candidate has a portfolio, so it is a veteran. No. 8 While the given candidate is seasoned, so it is headhunted. Question: Is the claim \"Sigrid has a background screening\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024083", "pair_id": "u024083-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024083-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "1ac6d044b3a7ebd8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024095-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bruno has no deductible waiver. Bruno has a payout ceiling of 75. Bruno has a claim frequency of 2. Bruno is not litigated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling under 41, it also has no roadside assistance. Clause 2: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling of 86 or less, it also is not bundled. Clause 3: once any policyholder is not bundled, it also has no beneficiary. Clause 4: once any policyholder is litigated, it also has a dashcam. Clause 5: once any policyholder is reinstated, it also is not reimbursed. Clause 6: once any policyholder is not reimbursed, it also is appraised. Clause 7: once any policyholder is litigated, it also is reimbursed. Clause 8: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling over 86, it also is reinstated. Clause 9: once any policyholder has a claim frequency of 38 or more, it also is not reinstated. Clause 10: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling of 22 or less, it also is not indemnified. Clause 11: once any policyholder has a dashcam, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 12: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also has roadside assistance. Clause 13: once any policyholder has no beneficiary, it also is indemnified. Clause 14: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling under 76, it also is subrogated. Clause 7 overrides Clause 5. Clause 13 overrides Clause 10. Clause 11 overrides Clause 3. Clause 12 overrides Clause 1. Clause 9 overrides Clause 8. Question: Which of these is true of Bruno?", "options": ["is indemnified", "is appraised"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is indemnified", "unit_id": "u024095", "pair_id": "u024095-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024095-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4c02ed4658154d84", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024095-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bruno has no deductible waiver. Bruno has a payout ceiling of 90. Bruno has a claim frequency of 2. Bruno is not litigated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling under 41, it also has no roadside assistance. Clause 2: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling of 86 or less, it also is not bundled. Clause 3: once any policyholder is not bundled, it also has no beneficiary. Clause 4: once any policyholder is litigated, it also has a dashcam. Clause 5: once any policyholder is reinstated, it also is not reimbursed. Clause 6: once any policyholder is not reimbursed, it also is appraised. Clause 7: once any policyholder is litigated, it also is reimbursed. Clause 8: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling over 86, it also is reinstated. Clause 9: once any policyholder has a claim frequency of 38 or more, it also is not reinstated. Clause 10: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling of 22 or less, it also is not indemnified. Clause 11: once any policyholder has a dashcam, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 12: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also has roadside assistance. Clause 13: once any policyholder has no beneficiary, it also is indemnified. Clause 14: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling under 76, it also is subrogated. Clause 7 overrides Clause 5. Clause 13 overrides Clause 10. Clause 11 overrides Clause 3. Clause 12 overrides Clause 1. Clause 9 overrides Clause 8. Question: Which of these is true of Bruno?", "options": ["is indemnified", "is appraised"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is appraised", "unit_id": "u024095", "pair_id": "u024095-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024095-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "72fbb1c545496f60", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a1"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024113-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is undeliverable. Rasmus is tracked. Liesel is weighed. Kaveh is not tracked. Kaveh is not refrigerated. Rasmus is undeliverable. Liesel has a postal zone of 73. Rasmus is not refrigerated. Rasmus is not perishable. Liesel is not consolidated. Rasmus has a postal zone of 86. Ulla has a postal zone of 42. Liesel is not perishable. Ulla is weighed. Kaveh is perishable.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has a courier and additionally has a postal zone of 79 or below, it then is sealed. #2 Each time a parcel is tracked, it then has a courier. #3 Each time a parcel is tracked and additionally is weighed, it then has no courier. #4 Each time a parcel has a courier and additionally has a postal zone greater than 79 and additionally is undeliverable, it then is not sealed. #5 Each time a parcel is refrigerated and additionally has a postal zone of 24 or above, it then is palletized. #2 is set aside if a parcel is undeliverable and additionally is weighed. #4 is set aside if a parcel is perishable and additionally is undeliverable. #3 yields to #2. #4 yields to #1. Question: Do the terms above show that Liesel is sealed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024113", "pair_id": "u024113-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024113-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "abbd693b73cd4192", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u024113-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is undeliverable. Rasmus is tracked. Liesel is tracked. Liesel is weighed. Kaveh is not tracked. Kaveh is not refrigerated. Rasmus is undeliverable. Liesel has a postal zone of 73. Rasmus is not refrigerated. Rasmus is not perishable. Liesel is not consolidated. Rasmus has a postal zone of 86. Ulla has a postal zone of 42. Liesel is not perishable. Ulla is weighed. Kaveh is perishable.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has a courier and additionally has a postal zone of 79 or below, it then is sealed. #2 Each time a parcel is tracked, it then has a courier. #3 Each time a parcel is tracked and additionally is weighed, it then has no courier. #4 Each time a parcel has a courier and additionally has a postal zone greater than 79 and additionally is undeliverable, it then is not sealed. #5 Each time a parcel is refrigerated and additionally has a postal zone of 24 or above, it then is palletized. #2 is set aside if a parcel is undeliverable and additionally is weighed. #4 is set aside if a parcel is perishable and additionally is undeliverable. #3 yields to #2. #4 yields to #1. Question: Do the terms above show that Liesel is sealed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024113", "pair_id": "u024113-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024113-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "06ccfd2e2f340e80", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u024115-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not signed. Galena is flaky. Basalt is not signed. Galena is signed. Basalt is not reproducible. Basalt has no feature toggle. Basalt is tested. Basalt is flaky. Galena has no feature toggle. Galena is reproducible. Gneiss is linted. Basalt is linted. Galena is not backported. Gneiss is versioned. Galena has a changelog. Gneiss is reproducible. Basalt is versioned. Gneiss has no changelog. Basalt has no changelog. Basalt is backported. Gneiss is tested. Galena is not linted. Galena is not tested.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is tested, then it is tagged. (2) If a build is tagged and is not flaky, then it is profiled. (3) If a build is tagged and is flaky, then it is not profiled. (4) If a build is not backported, then it is minified. (5) If a build has no changelog and is not reproducible, then it has a migration script. (6) If a build has no feature toggle, then it is not minified. (7) If a build is not versioned and is linted and is signed, then it is not tagged. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. When (2) and (3) clash, (2) prevails. When (7) and (1) clash, (7) prevails. Question: Is it true that Basalt is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024115", "pair_id": "u024115-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024115-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1bebbe60a411206e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 58}}
{"id": "syn-u024115-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not signed. Galena is flaky. Basalt is not signed. Galena is signed. Basalt is not reproducible. Basalt has no feature toggle. Basalt is tested. Basalt is flaky. Galena has no feature toggle. Galena is reproducible. Gneiss is linted. Basalt is linted. Galena is not backported. Gneiss is versioned. Galena has a changelog. Gneiss is reproducible. Basalt is versioned. Gneiss has no changelog. Basalt has no changelog. Basalt is backported. Gneiss is tested. Galena is not linted. Galena is not tested.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is not tested, then it is tagged. (2) If a build is tagged and is not flaky, then it is profiled. (3) If a build is tagged and is flaky, then it is not profiled. (4) If a build is not backported, then it is minified. (5) If a build has no changelog and is not reproducible, then it has a migration script. (6) If a build has no feature toggle, then it is not minified. (7) If a build is not versioned and is linted and is signed, then it is not tagged. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. When (2) and (3) clash, (2) prevails. When (7) and (1) clash, (7) prevails. Question: Is it true that Basalt is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024115", "pair_id": "u024115-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024115-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1905acd8afdd40a0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 58}}
{"id": "syn-u024117-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira has a citation index of 55. Nashira has no postdoc. Nashira has a team size of 65. Mirach is peer reviewed. Mirach is not multicenter. Nashira is peer reviewed. Electra is not multicenter. Nashira is not multicenter. Mirach has no postdoc.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is multicenter, it also is translational. Clause 2: once any proposal has a postdoc, it also is preregistered. Clause 3: once any proposal is preregistered, it also has seed funding. Clause 4: once any proposal is peer reviewed, it also has a steering committee. Clause 5: once any proposal is multicenter, it also is renewed. Clause 6: once any proposal is preregistered, it also has no seed funding. Clause 6 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a citation index of 44 or more. Clause 3 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a citation index under 44. Clause 2 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a team size of 86 or more. Clause 5 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a postdoc. Question: Does it follow that Nashira has no seed funding?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024117", "pair_id": "u024117-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024117-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a4aef071e0414ba5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024117-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira has a citation index of 55. Nashira has no postdoc. Nashira has a team size of 65. Mirach is peer reviewed. Mirach is not multicenter. Nashira is not peer reviewed. Electra is not multicenter. Nashira is not multicenter. Mirach has no postdoc.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is multicenter, it also is translational. Clause 2: once any proposal has a postdoc, it also is preregistered. Clause 3: once any proposal is preregistered, it also has seed funding. Clause 4: once any proposal is peer reviewed, it also has a steering committee. Clause 5: once any proposal is multicenter, it also is renewed. Clause 6: once any proposal is preregistered, it also has no seed funding. Clause 6 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a citation index of 44 or more. Clause 3 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a citation index under 44. Clause 2 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a team size of 86 or more. Clause 5 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a postdoc. Question: Does it follow that Nashira has no seed funding?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024117", "pair_id": "u024117-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024117-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d63b5e8c39f0962e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024140-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is not oversized. Rasmus is not stamped. Quentin is scanned. Saskia is not oversized. Saskia is not scanned. Rasmus is not oversized. Saskia is not stamped. Priya is not stamped. Saskia is not sealed. Priya is oversized.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is oversized and likewise is not sealed and likewise is scanned, so it is rerouted. Question: Is the claim \"Rasmus is stamped\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024140", "pair_id": "u024140-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024140-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "b2f03c6ee816aaf3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024140-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is not oversized. Rasmus is stamped. Quentin is scanned. Saskia is not oversized. Saskia is not scanned. Rasmus is not oversized. Saskia is not stamped. Priya is not stamped. Saskia is not sealed. Priya is oversized.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is oversized and likewise is not sealed and likewise is scanned, so it is rerouted. Question: Is the claim \"Rasmus is stamped\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024140", "pair_id": "u024140-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024140-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "49475dbcb5c8ef0c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024146-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has no lien. Ingrid has no collateral. Corin has an escrow account. Anouk is not a depositor. Ingrid is prequalified. Bastien is refinanced. Corin has no mortgage. Corin is amortized. Corin is not creditworthy. Anouk has a mortgage. Anouk is not underwritten. Ingrid is not underwritten. Anouk is not refinanced. Bastien is not a depositor. Bastien is amortized. Anouk has no escrow account. Ingrid is vetted. Ingrid has no mortgage. Corin is not delinquent. Bastien has a lien. Ingrid has a lien. Ingrid is not a depositor. Ingrid is delinquent. Anouk is bankrupt. Corin is underwritten. Anouk has no lien. Ingrid is amortized. Bastien is prequalified. Anouk is vetted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a cosigner and also has a lien and also is vetted, it also is not a homeowner. Clause 2: once any borrower is bankrupt and also is prequalified and also is amortized, it also has a cosigner. Clause 3: once any borrower has collateral, it also is pensioned. Clause 4: once any borrower has an escrow account and also is bankrupt, it also is employed. Clause 5: once any borrower is a depositor and also is underwritten, it also has no cosigner. Clause 6: once any borrower has a cosigner and also is creditworthy and also is refinanced, it also is a homeowner. Clause 7: once any borrower has a mortgage and also is delinquent, it also is indebted. Clause 6 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has collateral and also is vetted. Clause 7 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is creditworthy. Clause 1 overrides Clause 6. Clause 5 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Ingrid is a homeowner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024146", "pair_id": "u024146-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/24", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024146-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1aa4fcdd9203cdc8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a13", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024146-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has no lien. Ingrid has no collateral. Corin has an escrow account. Anouk is not a depositor. Ingrid is prequalified. Bastien is refinanced. Corin has no mortgage. Corin is amortized. Corin is not creditworthy. Anouk has a mortgage. Anouk is not underwritten. Ingrid is not underwritten. Anouk is not refinanced. Bastien is not a depositor. Bastien is amortized. Anouk has no escrow account. Ingrid is vetted. Ingrid has no mortgage. Corin is not delinquent. Bastien has a lien. Ingrid has a lien. Ingrid is not a depositor. Ingrid is delinquent. Anouk is bankrupt. Ingrid is bankrupt. Corin is underwritten. Anouk has no lien. Ingrid is amortized. Bastien is prequalified. Anouk is vetted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a cosigner and also has a lien and also is vetted, it also is not a homeowner. Clause 2: once any borrower is bankrupt and also is prequalified and also is amortized, it also has a cosigner. Clause 3: once any borrower has collateral, it also is pensioned. Clause 4: once any borrower has an escrow account and also is bankrupt, it also is employed. Clause 5: once any borrower is a depositor and also is underwritten, it also has no cosigner. Clause 6: once any borrower has a cosigner and also is creditworthy and also is refinanced, it also is a homeowner. Clause 7: once any borrower has a mortgage and also is delinquent, it also is indebted. Clause 6 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has collateral and also is vetted. Clause 7 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is creditworthy. Clause 1 overrides Clause 6. Clause 5 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Ingrid is a homeowner?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024146", "pair_id": "u024146-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/24", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024146-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e55b9889060374b0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a13", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024157-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tundra has a CPU quota of 52. Tundra is not replicated. Tundra has a latency budget of 51. Quasar is backed up. Vesper has a CPU quota of 33. Vesper has no snapshot. Borealis has no snapshot. Borealis has a memory allotment of 5. Borealis has a CPU quota of 44. Tundra has a snapshot. Quasar is not replicated. Vesper has a latency budget of 94. Borealis is backed up. Vesper has a memory allotment of 6. Quasar has no snapshot.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a snapshot while has a latency budget at or below 51, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 2: when the workload here has a snapshot while has a latency budget beyond 51, thus it is autoscaled. Provision 3: when the workload here is backed up, thus it is cached. Provision 4: when the workload here has a snapshot while has a memory allotment at or below 87 while is not replicated, thus it is mirrored. Provision 5: when the workload here has a CPU quota beneath 71, thus it is encrypted. Provision 6: when the workload here has a snapshot while has a memory allotment beyond 87 while has a latency budget at or above 67, thus it has a failover node. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here is provisioned. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here is replicated. Question: Which one describes Tundra?", "options": ["has a failover node", "has a dedicated host", "is mirrored", "is autoscaled"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a dedicated host", "unit_id": "u024157", "pair_id": "u024157-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024157-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7f80321d3eb4d386", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a12", "a6", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024157-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tundra has a CPU quota of 52. Tundra is not replicated. Tundra has a latency budget of 88. Quasar is backed up. Vesper has a CPU quota of 33. Vesper has no snapshot. Borealis has no snapshot. Borealis has a memory allotment of 5. Borealis has a CPU quota of 44. Tundra has a snapshot. Quasar is not replicated. Vesper has a latency budget of 94. Borealis is backed up. Vesper has a memory allotment of 6. Quasar has no snapshot.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a snapshot while has a latency budget at or below 51, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 2: when the workload here has a snapshot while has a latency budget beyond 51, thus it is autoscaled. Provision 3: when the workload here is backed up, thus it is cached. Provision 4: when the workload here has a snapshot while has a memory allotment at or below 87 while is not replicated, thus it is mirrored. Provision 5: when the workload here has a CPU quota beneath 71, thus it is encrypted. Provision 6: when the workload here has a snapshot while has a memory allotment beyond 87 while has a latency budget at or above 67, thus it has a failover node. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here is provisioned. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here is replicated. Question: Which one describes Tundra?", "options": ["has a failover node", "has a dedicated host", "is mirrored", "is autoscaled"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is autoscaled", "unit_id": "u024157", "pair_id": "u024157-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024157-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2ae87684bdfbd1ff", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a12", "a6", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024157-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tundra has a CPU quota of 52. Tundra is not replicated. Tundra has a latency budget of 51. Quasar is backed up. Vesper has a CPU quota of 33. Vesper has no snapshot. Borealis has no snapshot. Borealis has a memory allotment of 5. Borealis has a CPU quota of 44. Tundra has a snapshot. Quasar is not replicated. Vesper has a latency budget of 94. Borealis is backed up. Vesper has a memory allotment of 6. Quasar has no snapshot.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a snapshot and further has a latency budget of maximum 51, it thereby has a dedicated host. Point B. If said workload has a snapshot and further has a latency budget in excess of 51, it thereby is autoscaled. Point C. If said workload is backed up, it thereby is cached. Point D. If said workload has a snapshot and further has a memory allotment of maximum 87 and further is not replicated, it thereby is mirrored. Point E. If said workload has a CPU quota short of 71, it thereby is encrypted. Point F. If said workload has a snapshot and further has a memory allotment in excess of 87 and further has a latency budget of minimum 67, it thereby has a failover node. Point D is cancelled if said workload is provisioned. Point C is cancelled if said workload is replicated. Question: Which choice is true for Tundra?", "options": ["has a failover node", "has a dedicated host", "is mirrored", "is autoscaled"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a dedicated host", "unit_id": "u024157", "pair_id": "u024157-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024157-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7f80321d3eb4d386", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a12", "a6", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024157-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tundra has a CPU quota of 52. Tundra is not replicated. Tundra has a latency budget of 88. Quasar is backed up. Vesper has a CPU quota of 33. Vesper has no snapshot. Borealis has no snapshot. Borealis has a memory allotment of 5. Borealis has a CPU quota of 44. Tundra has a snapshot. Quasar is not replicated. Vesper has a latency budget of 94. Borealis is backed up. Vesper has a memory allotment of 6. Quasar has no snapshot.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a snapshot and further has a latency budget of maximum 51, it thereby has a dedicated host. Point B. If said workload has a snapshot and further has a latency budget in excess of 51, it thereby is autoscaled. Point C. If said workload is backed up, it thereby is cached. Point D. If said workload has a snapshot and further has a memory allotment of maximum 87 and further is not replicated, it thereby is mirrored. Point E. If said workload has a CPU quota short of 71, it thereby is encrypted. Point F. If said workload has a snapshot and further has a memory allotment in excess of 87 and further has a latency budget of minimum 67, it thereby has a failover node. Point D is cancelled if said workload is provisioned. Point C is cancelled if said workload is replicated. Question: Which choice is true for Tundra?", "options": ["has a failover node", "has a dedicated host", "is mirrored", "is autoscaled"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is autoscaled", "unit_id": "u024157", "pair_id": "u024157-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024157-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2ae87684bdfbd1ff", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a7", "a12", "a6", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024172-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is theoretical. Electra is not longitudinal. Electra is a pilot study.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it has ethics clearance. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is resubmitted: then it is not budgeted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee: then it is exploratory. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has a patent filing: then it is not cofunded. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee: then it is not exploratory. Policy V is waived if that proposal is not a pilot study. Policy IV is waived if that proposal is not theoretical. Policy V is waived if that proposal is longitudinal. Policy V is waived if that proposal has no patent filing. Policy I is waived if that proposal has no steering committee. Policy III is waived if that proposal is not longitudinal. Question: Is it so that Electra is not exploratory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024172", "pair_id": "u024172-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024172-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f0254fc8cdd4b3bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024172-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra has a steering committee. Electra is theoretical. Electra is not longitudinal. Electra is a pilot study.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it has ethics clearance. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is resubmitted: then it is not budgeted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee: then it is exploratory. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has a patent filing: then it is not cofunded. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee: then it is not exploratory. Policy V is waived if that proposal is not a pilot study. Policy IV is waived if that proposal is not theoretical. Policy V is waived if that proposal is longitudinal. Policy V is waived if that proposal has no patent filing. Policy I is waived if that proposal has no steering committee. Policy III is waived if that proposal is not longitudinal. Question: Is it so that Electra is not exploratory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024172", "pair_id": "u024172-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024172-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c39aa857aa8d42b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024182-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is theoretical. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is embargoed. Electra is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has no steering committee, it then is preregistered. #2 Each time a proposal is not preregistered, it then has a patent filing. #3 Each time a proposal is embargoed, it then is not budgeted. #4 Each time a proposal is embargoed, it then has no ethics clearance. #5 Each time a proposal is embargoed, it then is not preregistered. #6 Each time a proposal is not theoretical, it then is endorsed. #7 Each time a proposal is not preregistered, it then has no patent filing. #2 is set aside if a proposal is shortlisted. #2 is set aside if a proposal is shortlisted. #7 is set aside if a proposal is not shortlisted. #5 yields to #1. #2 yields to #7. Question: Do the terms above show that Electra has a patent filing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024182", "pair_id": "u024182-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024182-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2e5697701a6d9482", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024182-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is theoretical. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is embargoed. Electra is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has no steering committee, it then is preregistered. #2 Each time a proposal is not preregistered, it then has a patent filing. #3 Each time a proposal is embargoed, it then is not budgeted. #4 Each time a proposal is embargoed, it then has no ethics clearance. #5 Each time a proposal is embargoed, it then is not preregistered. #6 Each time a proposal is not theoretical, it then is endorsed. #7 Each time a proposal is not preregistered, it then has no patent filing. #2 is set aside if a proposal is shortlisted. #4 is set aside if a proposal is embargoed. #2 is set aside if a proposal is shortlisted. #7 is set aside if a proposal is not shortlisted. #5 yields to #1. #2 yields to #7. Question: Do the terms above show that Electra has a patent filing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024182", "pair_id": "u024182-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024182-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a37575f8bfc9a0c2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024195-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas is not creditworthy. Anouk is solvent. Anouk has collateral. Anouk is not employed. Tomas is indebted. Anouk has no escrow account. Anouk is indebted. Tomas is employed. Anouk is garnished. Anouk is not creditworthy.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is a homeowner while is indebted while is refinanced, thus it is not vetted. Provision 2: when the borrower here is not creditworthy, thus it has a mortgage. Provision 3: when the borrower here has collateral while has an escrow account, thus it has a lien. Provision 4: when the borrower here is creditworthy while is solvent, thus it is a depositor. Provision 5: when the borrower here is solvent, thus it is a homeowner. Provision 6: when the borrower here is a homeowner while is solvent while has a mortgage, thus it is vetted. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here is garnished. Provision 1 has no effect when the borrower here is employed. Question: Would it be right to say that Anouk is vetted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024195", "pair_id": "u024195-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024195-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0dc2b27b6ceb6991", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024195-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas is not creditworthy. Anouk is solvent. Anouk has collateral. Anouk is not employed. Tomas is indebted. Anouk has no escrow account. Anouk is indebted. Tomas is employed. Anouk is garnished. Anouk is not creditworthy.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is a homeowner while is indebted while is refinanced, thus it is not vetted. Provision 2: when the borrower here is creditworthy, thus it has a mortgage. Provision 3: when the borrower here has collateral while has an escrow account, thus it has a lien. Provision 4: when the borrower here is creditworthy while is solvent, thus it is a depositor. Provision 5: when the borrower here is solvent, thus it is a homeowner. Provision 6: when the borrower here is a homeowner while is solvent while has a mortgage, thus it is vetted. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here is garnished. Provision 1 has no effect when the borrower here is employed. Question: Would it be right to say that Anouk is vetted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024195", "pair_id": "u024195-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024195-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "846526b4cc093525", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024195-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas is not creditworthy. Anouk is solvent. Anouk has collateral. Anouk is not employed. Tomas is indebted. Anouk has no escrow account. Anouk is indebted. Tomas is employed. Anouk is garnished. Anouk is not creditworthy.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is a homeowner and likewise is indebted and likewise is refinanced, so it is not vetted. No. 2 While the given borrower is not creditworthy, so it has a mortgage. No. 3 While the given borrower has collateral and likewise has an escrow account, so it has a lien. No. 4 While the given borrower is creditworthy and likewise is solvent, so it is a depositor. No. 5 While the given borrower is solvent, so it is a homeowner. No. 6 While the given borrower is a homeowner and likewise is solvent and likewise has a mortgage, so it is vetted. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given borrower is garnished. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given borrower is employed. Question: Is the claim \"Anouk is vetted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024195", "pair_id": "u024195-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024195-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0dc2b27b6ceb6991", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024195-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas is not creditworthy. Anouk is solvent. Anouk has collateral. Anouk is not employed. Tomas is indebted. Anouk has no escrow account. Anouk is indebted. Tomas is employed. Anouk is garnished. Anouk is not creditworthy.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is a homeowner and likewise is indebted and likewise is refinanced, so it is not vetted. No. 2 While the given borrower is creditworthy, so it has a mortgage. No. 3 While the given borrower has collateral and likewise has an escrow account, so it has a lien. No. 4 While the given borrower is creditworthy and likewise is solvent, so it is a depositor. No. 5 While the given borrower is solvent, so it is a homeowner. No. 6 While the given borrower is a homeowner and likewise is solvent and likewise has a mortgage, so it is vetted. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given borrower is garnished. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given borrower is employed. Question: Is the claim \"Anouk is vetted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024195", "pair_id": "u024195-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024195-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "846526b4cc093525", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024214-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dorian is contagious. Vilja is fasting. Vilja is not symptomatic. Dorian is not symptomatic. Wendel is contagious. Dorian is fasting. Vilja is discharged. Dorian is hypertensive. Dorian is not bedridden. Dorian has a caregiver. Wendel is not hypertensive. Vilja is hypertensive.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is bedridden, then it has an interpreter. (2) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is asthmatic. (3) If a patient is fasting, then it is rescheduled. (4) If a patient has a caregiver, then it is allergic. (5) If a patient is contagious, then it has no pacemaker. (6) If a patient is discharged, then it has no pacemaker. (7) If a patient is contagious, then it is anemic. (8) If a patient is symptomatic, then it has a pacemaker. (9) If a patient is hypertensive, then it has no interpreter. When (8) and (6) clash, (8) prevails. When (9) and (1) clash, (9) prevails. When (5) and (8) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Wendel?", "options": ["is anemic", "is allergic", "is asthmatic", "has an interpreter", "has a pacemaker"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is anemic", "unit_id": "u024214", "pair_id": "u024214-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024214-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "92c14ef71b8a7abd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a1", "a0", "a10", "a4"]}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u024214-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dorian is contagious. Vilja is fasting. Vilja is not symptomatic. Dorian is not symptomatic. Wendel is contagious. Dorian is fasting. Vilja is discharged. Dorian is hypertensive. Wendel is symptomatic. Dorian is not bedridden. Dorian has a caregiver. Wendel is not hypertensive. Vilja is hypertensive.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is bedridden, then it has an interpreter. (2) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is asthmatic. (3) If a patient is fasting, then it is rescheduled. (4) If a patient has a caregiver, then it is allergic. (5) If a patient is contagious, then it has no pacemaker. (6) If a patient is discharged, then it has no pacemaker. (7) If a patient is contagious, then it is anemic. (8) If a patient is symptomatic, then it has a pacemaker. (9) If a patient is hypertensive, then it has no interpreter. When (8) and (6) clash, (8) prevails. When (9) and (1) clash, (9) prevails. When (5) and (8) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Wendel?", "options": ["is anemic", "is allergic", "is asthmatic", "has an interpreter", "has a pacemaker"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is anemic", "unit_id": "u024214", "pair_id": "u024214-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024214-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "d6b4e680780c5b28", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a1", "a0", "a10", "a4"]}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u024232-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads has a seniority step of 58. Mads is not unionized. Ivo is a veteran. Mads is licensed. Petra is a veteran. Petra has a notice period of 37. Ivo is headhunted. Petra is licensed. Mads is not headhunted. Ivo is licensed. Ivo has a seniority step of 19. Ivo has an aptitude quotient of 2.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is a veteran and additionally has a notice period less than 63 and additionally is headhunted, it then has no diploma. #2 Each time a candidate is licensed, it then is sponsored. #3 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient of 18 or below, it then has a signing bonus. #4 Each time a candidate is a veteran, it then is fingerprinted. #5 Each time a candidate is a veteran and additionally has a notice period of 63 or above and additionally has a seniority step greater than 68, it then has a diploma. #3 is set aside if a candidate is not unionized. #5 is set aside if a candidate is headhunted. #2 is set aside if a candidate is not a veteran. Question: Do the terms above show that Ivo has a diploma?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024232", "pair_id": "u024232-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024232-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2c4ccc7a9f62abce", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024232-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads has a seniority step of 58. Mads is not unionized. Ivo is a veteran. Mads is licensed. Petra is a veteran. Petra has a notice period of 37. Ivo is headhunted. Ivo has a notice period of 34. Petra is licensed. Mads is not headhunted. Ivo is licensed. Ivo has a seniority step of 19. Ivo has an aptitude quotient of 2.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is a veteran and additionally has a notice period less than 63 and additionally is headhunted, it then has no diploma. #2 Each time a candidate is licensed, it then is sponsored. #3 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient of 18 or below, it then has a signing bonus. #4 Each time a candidate is a veteran, it then is fingerprinted. #5 Each time a candidate is a veteran and additionally has a notice period of 63 or above and additionally has a seniority step greater than 68, it then has a diploma. #3 is set aside if a candidate is not unionized. #5 is set aside if a candidate is headhunted. #2 is set aside if a candidate is not a veteran. Question: Do the terms above show that Ivo has a diploma?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024232", "pair_id": "u024232-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024232-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "26f72e84ecc4d087", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024237-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has no rider. Edda is indemnified. Edda is disputed. Edda is uninsurable. Edda has a premium band of 43. Edda is subrogated. Edda has a beneficiary. Bruno is not indemnified. Bruno has a premium band of 33. Edda has a payout ceiling of 21. Edda has no premium discount. Edda has a rider. Edda is reimbursed. Edda has a dashcam.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is indemnified and is disputed, then it is a claimant. (2) If a policyholder has a premium discount, then it has no flood coverage. (3) If a policyholder is reinstated and has a premium band of at most 54 and has a dashcam, then it has a deductible waiver. (4) If a policyholder is lapsed and is bundled, then it is not reinstated. (5) If a policyholder is subrogated and has a beneficiary, then it has flood coverage. (6) If a policyholder is reimbursed and is disputed, then it is lapsed. (7) If a policyholder is a claimant and has a payout ceiling below 21, then it is reinstated. (8) If a policyholder is reinstated and has a premium band above 54 and has a payout ceiling of at most 27, then it has no deductible waiver. (6) is void if the policyholder is uninsurable. (8) is void if the policyholder has a dashcam and has a payout ceiling of at least 11. (5) is void if the policyholder has a rider. When (7) and (4) clash, (7) prevails. When (2) and (5) clash, (2) prevails. When (3) and (8) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Edda has no deductible waiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024237", "pair_id": "u024237-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024237-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec587833c99f1b9f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a13", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024237-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has no rider. Edda is indemnified. Edda is disputed. Edda is uninsurable. Edda has a premium band of 43. Edda is subrogated. Edda has a beneficiary. Bruno is not indemnified. Bruno has a premium band of 33. Edda has a payout ceiling of 21. Edda has no premium discount. Edda has a rider. Edda is reimbursed. Edda has a dashcam.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is indemnified and is disputed, then it is a claimant. (2) If a policyholder has a premium discount, then it has no flood coverage. (3) If a policyholder is reinstated and has a premium band of at most 54 and has a dashcam, then it has a deductible waiver. (4) If a policyholder is lapsed and is bundled, then it is not reinstated. (5) If a policyholder is subrogated and has a beneficiary, then it has flood coverage. (6) If a policyholder is reimbursed and is disputed, then it is lapsed. (7) If a policyholder is a claimant and has a payout ceiling below 22, then it is reinstated. (8) If a policyholder is reinstated and has a premium band above 54 and has a payout ceiling of at most 27, then it has no deductible waiver. (6) is void if the policyholder is uninsurable. (8) is void if the policyholder has a dashcam and has a payout ceiling of at least 11. (5) is void if the policyholder has a rider. When (7) and (4) clash, (7) prevails. When (2) and (5) clash, (2) prevails. When (3) and (8) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Edda has no deductible waiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024237", "pair_id": "u024237-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024237-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fd633d478ecdb8cb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a13", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024237-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has no rider. Edda is indemnified. Edda is disputed. Edda is uninsurable. Edda has a premium band of 43. Edda is subrogated. Edda has a beneficiary. Bruno is not indemnified. Bruno has a premium band of 33. Edda has a payout ceiling of 21. Edda has no premium discount. Edda has a rider. Edda is reimbursed. Edda has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is indemnified and also is disputed, it also is a claimant. Clause 2: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also has no flood coverage. Clause 3: once any policyholder is reinstated and also has a premium band of 54 or less and also has a dashcam, it also has a deductible waiver. Clause 4: once any policyholder is lapsed and also is bundled, it also is not reinstated. Clause 5: once any policyholder is subrogated and also has a beneficiary, it also has flood coverage. Clause 6: once any policyholder is reimbursed and also is disputed, it also is lapsed. Clause 7: once any policyholder is a claimant and also has a payout ceiling under 21, it also is reinstated. Clause 8: once any policyholder is reinstated and also has a premium band over 54 and also has a payout ceiling of 27 or less, it also has no deductible waiver. Clause 6 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is uninsurable. Clause 8 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a dashcam and also has a payout ceiling of 11 or more. Clause 5 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a rider. Clause 7 overrides Clause 4. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Clause 3 overrides Clause 8. Question: Does it follow that Edda has no deductible waiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024237", "pair_id": "u024237-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024237-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec587833c99f1b9f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a13", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024237-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has no rider. Edda is indemnified. Edda is disputed. Edda is uninsurable. Edda has a premium band of 43. Edda is subrogated. Edda has a beneficiary. Bruno is not indemnified. Bruno has a premium band of 33. Edda has a payout ceiling of 21. Edda has no premium discount. Edda has a rider. Edda is reimbursed. Edda has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is indemnified and also is disputed, it also is a claimant. Clause 2: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also has no flood coverage. Clause 3: once any policyholder is reinstated and also has a premium band of 54 or less and also has a dashcam, it also has a deductible waiver. Clause 4: once any policyholder is lapsed and also is bundled, it also is not reinstated. Clause 5: once any policyholder is subrogated and also has a beneficiary, it also has flood coverage. Clause 6: once any policyholder is reimbursed and also is disputed, it also is lapsed. Clause 7: once any policyholder is a claimant and also has a payout ceiling under 22, it also is reinstated. Clause 8: once any policyholder is reinstated and also has a premium band over 54 and also has a payout ceiling of 27 or less, it also has no deductible waiver. Clause 6 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is uninsurable. Clause 8 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a dashcam and also has a payout ceiling of 11 or more. Clause 5 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a rider. Clause 7 overrides Clause 4. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Clause 3 overrides Clause 8. Question: Does it follow that Edda has no deductible waiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024237", "pair_id": "u024237-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024237-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fd633d478ecdb8cb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a13", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024237-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has no rider. Edda is indemnified. Edda is disputed. Edda is uninsurable. Edda has a premium band of 43. Edda is subrogated. Edda has a beneficiary. Bruno is not indemnified. Bruno has a premium band of 33. Edda has a payout ceiling of 21. Edda has no premium discount. Edda has a rider. Edda is reimbursed. Edda has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is indemnified, and is disputed, that policyholder is a claimant. Item B. When the policyholder has a premium discount, that policyholder has no flood coverage. Item C. When the policyholder is reinstated, and has a premium band of no more than 54, and has a dashcam, that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Item D. When the policyholder is lapsed, and is bundled, that policyholder is not reinstated. Item E. When the policyholder is subrogated, and has a beneficiary, that policyholder has flood coverage. Item F. When the policyholder is reimbursed, and is disputed, that policyholder is lapsed. Item G. When the policyholder is a claimant, and has a payout ceiling of less than 21, that policyholder is reinstated. Item H. When the policyholder is reinstated, and has a premium band of more than 54, and has a payout ceiling of no more than 27, that policyholder has no deductible waiver. Item F is suspended when the policyholder is uninsurable. Item H is suspended when the policyholder has a dashcam, and has a payout ceiling of no less than 11. Item E is suspended when the policyholder has a rider. Item G outranks Item D. Item B outranks Item E. Item C outranks Item H. Question: Can one infer that Edda has no deductible waiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024237", "pair_id": "u024237-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024237-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec587833c99f1b9f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a13", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024237-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has no rider. Edda is indemnified. Edda is disputed. Edda is uninsurable. Edda has a premium band of 43. Edda is subrogated. Edda has a beneficiary. Bruno is not indemnified. Bruno has a premium band of 33. Edda has a payout ceiling of 21. Edda has no premium discount. Edda has a rider. Edda is reimbursed. Edda has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is indemnified, and is disputed, that policyholder is a claimant. Item B. When the policyholder has a premium discount, that policyholder has no flood coverage. Item C. When the policyholder is reinstated, and has a premium band of no more than 54, and has a dashcam, that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Item D. When the policyholder is lapsed, and is bundled, that policyholder is not reinstated. Item E. When the policyholder is subrogated, and has a beneficiary, that policyholder has flood coverage. Item F. When the policyholder is reimbursed, and is disputed, that policyholder is lapsed. Item G. When the policyholder is a claimant, and has a payout ceiling of less than 22, that policyholder is reinstated. Item H. When the policyholder is reinstated, and has a premium band of more than 54, and has a payout ceiling of no more than 27, that policyholder has no deductible waiver. Item F is suspended when the policyholder is uninsurable. Item H is suspended when the policyholder has a dashcam, and has a payout ceiling of no less than 11. Item E is suspended when the policyholder has a rider. Item G outranks Item D. Item B outranks Item E. Item C outranks Item H. Question: Can one infer that Edda has no deductible waiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024237", "pair_id": "u024237-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024237-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fd633d478ecdb8cb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a13", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024267-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Cobalt is not sharded. Sierra has a failover node. Cobalt has a latency budget of 5. Cobalt is replicated. Orrery has a snapshot. Orrery has a failover node. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 12. Cobalt has a snapshot. Sierra has a memory allotment of 14. Tundra is not replicated. Orrery is replicated. Sierra has a latency budget of 4. Orrery has a latency budget of 85. Orrery has a memory allotment of 61. Orrery is not sharded.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a failover node while has a memory allotment beyond 50, thus it is patched. Provision 2: when the workload here has a latency budget beneath 72 while is monitored, thus it is not provisioned. Provision 3: when the workload here is replicated while has no snapshot, thus it is isolated. Provision 4: when the workload here is replicated while has a latency budget at or above 39, thus it has a public endpoint. Provision 5: when the workload here is replicated while is monitored, thus it is containerized. Provision 6: when the workload here is replicated while has a memory allotment beneath 53 while has a latency budget at or below 49, thus it is deprecated. Provision 7: when the workload here is replicated while is not monitored, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 8: when the workload here is replicated while is not sharded, thus it is virtualized. Provision 9: when the workload here is monitored, thus it is not autoscaled. Provision 2 has no effect when the workload here is not monitored. Provision 8 has no effect when the workload here has a latency budget beyond 84. Provision 6 has no effect when the workload here is not sharded. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here has no snapshot. Question: Which one describes Orrery?", "options": ["has a public endpoint", "is deprecated", "is virtualized", "is containerized", "is isolated", "has a dedicated host"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a public endpoint", "unit_id": "u024267", "pair_id": "u024267-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024267-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "010c15b2cae95fcc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a14", "a12", "a3", "a11", "a13", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024267-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Cobalt is not sharded. Sierra has a failover node. Cobalt has a latency budget of 5. Cobalt is replicated. Orrery has a snapshot. Orrery has a failover node. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 12. Cobalt has a snapshot. Sierra has a memory allotment of 14. Tundra is not replicated. Orrery is replicated. Sierra has a latency budget of 4. Orrery has a latency budget of 13. Orrery has a memory allotment of 61. Orrery is not sharded.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a failover node while has a memory allotment beyond 50, thus it is patched. Provision 2: when the workload here has a latency budget beneath 72 while is monitored, thus it is not provisioned. Provision 3: when the workload here is replicated while has no snapshot, thus it is isolated. Provision 4: when the workload here is replicated while has a latency budget at or above 39, thus it has a public endpoint. Provision 5: when the workload here is replicated while is monitored, thus it is containerized. Provision 6: when the workload here is replicated while has a memory allotment beneath 53 while has a latency budget at or below 49, thus it is deprecated. Provision 7: when the workload here is replicated while is not monitored, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 8: when the workload here is replicated while is not sharded, thus it is virtualized. Provision 9: when the workload here is monitored, thus it is not autoscaled. Provision 2 has no effect when the workload here is not monitored. Provision 8 has no effect when the workload here has a latency budget beyond 84. Provision 6 has no effect when the workload here is not sharded. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here has no snapshot. Question: Which one describes Orrery?", "options": ["has a public endpoint", "is deprecated", "is virtualized", "is containerized", "is isolated", "has a dedicated host"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is virtualized", "unit_id": "u024267", "pair_id": "u024267-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024267-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a34510574231bcdf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a14", "a12", "a3", "a11", "a13", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024267-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Cobalt is not sharded. Sierra has a failover node. Cobalt has a latency budget of 5. Cobalt is replicated. Orrery has a snapshot. Orrery has a failover node. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 12. Cobalt has a snapshot. Sierra has a memory allotment of 14. Tundra is not replicated. Orrery is replicated. Sierra has a latency budget of 4. Orrery has a latency budget of 85. Orrery has a memory allotment of 61. Orrery is not sharded.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a failover node and likewise has a memory allotment that exceeds 50, so it is patched. No. 2 While the given workload has a latency budget that falls below 72 and likewise is monitored, so it is not provisioned. No. 3 While the given workload is replicated and likewise has no snapshot, so it is isolated. No. 4 While the given workload is replicated and likewise has a latency budget not below 39, so it has a public endpoint. No. 5 While the given workload is replicated and likewise is monitored, so it is containerized. No. 6 While the given workload is replicated and likewise has a memory allotment that falls below 53 and likewise has a latency budget not above 49, so it is deprecated. No. 7 While the given workload is replicated and likewise is not monitored, so it has a dedicated host. No. 8 While the given workload is replicated and likewise is not sharded, so it is virtualized. No. 9 While the given workload is monitored, so it is not autoscaled. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given workload is not monitored. No. 8 stops applying as long as the given workload has a latency budget that exceeds 84. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given workload is not sharded. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload has no snapshot. Question: Select what holds for Orrery: which option?", "options": ["has a public endpoint", "is deprecated", "is virtualized", "is containerized", "is isolated", "has a dedicated host"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a public endpoint", "unit_id": "u024267", "pair_id": "u024267-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024267-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "010c15b2cae95fcc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a14", "a12", "a3", "a11", "a13", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024267-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Cobalt is not sharded. Sierra has a failover node. Cobalt has a latency budget of 5. Cobalt is replicated. Orrery has a snapshot. Orrery has a failover node. Cobalt has a memory allotment of 12. Cobalt has a snapshot. Sierra has a memory allotment of 14. Tundra is not replicated. Orrery is replicated. Sierra has a latency budget of 4. Orrery has a latency budget of 13. Orrery has a memory allotment of 61. Orrery is not sharded.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a failover node and likewise has a memory allotment that exceeds 50, so it is patched. No. 2 While the given workload has a latency budget that falls below 72 and likewise is monitored, so it is not provisioned. No. 3 While the given workload is replicated and likewise has no snapshot, so it is isolated. No. 4 While the given workload is replicated and likewise has a latency budget not below 39, so it has a public endpoint. No. 5 While the given workload is replicated and likewise is monitored, so it is containerized. No. 6 While the given workload is replicated and likewise has a memory allotment that falls below 53 and likewise has a latency budget not above 49, so it is deprecated. No. 7 While the given workload is replicated and likewise is not monitored, so it has a dedicated host. No. 8 While the given workload is replicated and likewise is not sharded, so it is virtualized. No. 9 While the given workload is monitored, so it is not autoscaled. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given workload is not monitored. No. 8 stops applying as long as the given workload has a latency budget that exceeds 84. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given workload is not sharded. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload has no snapshot. Question: Select what holds for Orrery: which option?", "options": ["has a public endpoint", "is deprecated", "is virtualized", "is containerized", "is isolated", "has a dedicated host"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is virtualized", "unit_id": "u024267", "pair_id": "u024267-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024267-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a34510574231bcdf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a14", "a12", "a3", "a11", "a13", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024274-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra has no firewall. Halcyon is encrypted. Sierra is not throttled. Halcyon has no failover node. Sierra is not virtualized. Vesper is not replicated. Halcyon is stateless. Vesper is idle. Vesper has no firewall. Sierra is encrypted. Vesper is encrypted. Vesper is virtualized. Sierra has a failover node. Halcyon is virtualized. Sierra is not idle. Sierra is mirrored. Vesper is throttled. Halcyon has a firewall. Vesper is not mirrored.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a snapshot while is stateless while is virtualized, thus it is containerized. Provision 2: when the workload here is autoscaled while has a firewall, thus it has no dedicated host. Provision 3: when the workload here has no failover node, thus it is autoscaled. Provision 4: when the workload here is replicated, thus it is sharded. Provision 5: when the workload here has a firewall, thus it is not deprecated. Provision 6: when the workload here has a snapshot while is mirrored while is encrypted, thus it is not containerized. Provision 7: when the workload here is autoscaled, thus it has a snapshot. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here is idle while has a failover node. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here is encrypted. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here is encrypted while is throttled. Question: Would it be right to say that Sierra is not containerized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024274", "pair_id": "u024274-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024274-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a745528cc1183c7c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u024274-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra has no firewall. Halcyon is encrypted. Sierra is not throttled. Halcyon has no failover node. Sierra is not virtualized. Vesper is not replicated. Halcyon is stateless. Vesper is idle. Vesper has no firewall. Sierra is encrypted. Vesper is encrypted. Vesper is virtualized. Sierra has a failover node. Halcyon is virtualized. Sierra is not idle. Sierra is mirrored. Vesper is throttled. Halcyon has a firewall. Vesper is not mirrored.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a snapshot while is stateless while is virtualized, thus it is containerized. Provision 2: when the workload here is autoscaled while has a firewall, thus it has no dedicated host. Provision 3: when the workload here has a failover node, thus it is autoscaled. Provision 4: when the workload here is replicated, thus it is sharded. Provision 5: when the workload here has a firewall, thus it is not deprecated. Provision 6: when the workload here has a snapshot while is mirrored while is encrypted, thus it is not containerized. Provision 7: when the workload here is autoscaled, thus it has a snapshot. Provision 3 has no effect when the workload here is idle while has a failover node. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here is encrypted. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here is encrypted while is throttled. Question: Would it be right to say that Sierra is not containerized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024274", "pair_id": "u024274-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024274-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e6606ae1ad087a83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u024282-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach is not renewed. Aldebaran is endorsed. Electra is interdisciplinary. Mirach is not interdisciplinary. Aldebaran is not renewed. Mirach is endorsed. Mirach is not preregistered. Mirach has seed funding. Aldebaran is interdisciplinary. Electra is not renewed. Aldebaran is preregistered. Electra is endorsed.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is resubmitted, then it is not longitudinal. (2) If a proposal has seed funding, then it is a pilot study. (3) If a proposal is not endorsed, then it has a patent filing. (4) If a proposal is resubmitted, then it is longitudinal. (5) If a proposal is a pilot study, then it is resubmitted. (1) is void if the proposal is renewed. (3) is void if the proposal is not renewed. (1) is void if the proposal is not preregistered. (1) is void if the proposal is interdisciplinary. (4) is void if the proposal is preregistered. Question: Is it true that Aldebaran is longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024282", "pair_id": "u024282-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024282-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8f028648d766fc91", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u024282-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach is not renewed. Aldebaran is endorsed. Aldebaran has seed funding. Electra is interdisciplinary. Mirach is not interdisciplinary. Aldebaran is not renewed. Mirach is endorsed. Mirach is not preregistered. Mirach has seed funding. Aldebaran is interdisciplinary. Electra is not renewed. Aldebaran is preregistered. Electra is endorsed.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is resubmitted, then it is not longitudinal. (2) If a proposal has seed funding, then it is a pilot study. (3) If a proposal is not endorsed, then it has a patent filing. (4) If a proposal is resubmitted, then it is longitudinal. (5) If a proposal is a pilot study, then it is resubmitted. (1) is void if the proposal is renewed. (3) is void if the proposal is not renewed. (1) is void if the proposal is not preregistered. (1) is void if the proposal is interdisciplinary. (4) is void if the proposal is preregistered. Question: Is it true that Aldebaran is longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024282", "pair_id": "u024282-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024282-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "71c484f8fa939572", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u024289-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is not disputed. Edda is not grandfathered. Yara is appraised. Edda has flood coverage. Una is uninsurable. Yara has an adjuster. Una is not disputed. Edda has a dashcam. Edda has an adjuster. Yara is grandfathered. Yara is a smoker. Edda is not appraised. Edda is uninsurable. Yara has flood coverage. Yara is uninsurable.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster plus is subrogated: then it is not lapsed. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is uninsurable: then it is not indemnified. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is uninsurable plus is disputed: then it has a rider. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam plus has flood coverage plus is grandfathered: then it is not bundled. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is appraised plus is a smoker. Question: Is it so that Edda is lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024289", "pair_id": "u024289-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024289-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "73c8fac360d87347", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024289-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is not disputed. Edda is not grandfathered. Yara is appraised. Edda has flood coverage. Una is uninsurable. Yara has an adjuster. Una is not disputed. Edda has a dashcam. Edda has an adjuster. Yara is grandfathered. Yara is a smoker. Edda is not appraised. Edda is uninsurable. Yara has flood coverage. Yara is uninsurable.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster plus is subrogated: then it is not lapsed. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster plus has a dashcam plus has flood coverage: then it is lapsed. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is uninsurable: then it is not indemnified. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is uninsurable plus is disputed: then it has a rider. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has a dashcam plus has flood coverage plus is grandfathered: then it is not bundled. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is appraised plus is a smoker. Question: Is it so that Edda is lapsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024289", "pair_id": "u024289-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024289-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "46e72d35a1143e47", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024304-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is sedated. Yusuf is sedated. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 95. Yusuf is not referred. Vilja is referred. Gunnar is referred. Gunnar is sedated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient has a mobility rank that exceeds 26, so it is ambulatory. No. 2 While the given patient is sedated and likewise is referred, so it is not bedridden. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given patient is anemic and likewise is referred. Question: Is the claim \"Vilja is postoperative\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024304", "pair_id": "u024304-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024304-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9a77f21abd0f549c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024304-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is sedated. Yusuf is sedated. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 95. Yusuf is not referred. Vilja is referred. Gunnar is referred. Vilja is postoperative. Gunnar is sedated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient has a mobility rank that exceeds 26, so it is ambulatory. No. 2 While the given patient is sedated and likewise is referred, so it is not bedridden. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given patient is anemic and likewise is referred. Question: Is the claim \"Vilja is postoperative\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024304", "pair_id": "u024304-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024304-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7e55338fef17b163", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024318-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ulla is sealed. Saskia is not refrigerated. Ulla has no waybill. Nandor has a waybill.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here has no waybill, thus it is consolidated. Provision 2: when the parcel here is not sealed, thus it is not hazardous. Provision 3: when the parcel here is misrouted, thus it is not palletized. Provision 4: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it is fragile. Provision 5: when the parcel here is not registered, thus it is delayed. Provision 6: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it is hazardous. Provision 7: when the parcel here has a weight class beneath 10, thus it is rerouted. Provision 8: when the parcel here has a weight class at or above 10, thus it is palletized. Provision 9: when the parcel here is not sealed, thus it is damaged. Provision 10: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it is not weighed. Provision 11: when the parcel here is registered, thus it has a locker slot. Provision 12: when the parcel here is misrouted, thus it is weighed. Provision 13: when the parcel here is sealed, thus it is labeled. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 12. Question: Which one describes Ulla?", "options": ["has a locker slot", "is labeled", "is delayed", "is fragile", "is weighed", "is damaged", "is palletized", "is rerouted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is labeled", "unit_id": "u024318", "pair_id": "u024318-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024318-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c25bf660669343ff", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a6", "a4", "a10", "a7", "a13", "a11", "a8", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024318-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ulla is sealed. Saskia is not refrigerated. Ulla has a waybill. Nandor has a waybill.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here has no waybill, thus it is consolidated. Provision 2: when the parcel here is not sealed, thus it is not hazardous. Provision 3: when the parcel here is misrouted, thus it is not palletized. Provision 4: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it is fragile. Provision 5: when the parcel here is not registered, thus it is delayed. Provision 6: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it is hazardous. Provision 7: when the parcel here has a weight class beneath 10, thus it is rerouted. Provision 8: when the parcel here has a weight class at or above 10, thus it is palletized. Provision 9: when the parcel here is not sealed, thus it is damaged. Provision 10: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it is not weighed. Provision 11: when the parcel here is registered, thus it has a locker slot. Provision 12: when the parcel here is misrouted, thus it is weighed. Provision 13: when the parcel here is sealed, thus it is labeled. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 12. Question: Which one describes Ulla?", "options": ["has a locker slot", "is labeled", "is delayed", "is fragile", "is weighed", "is damaged", "is palletized", "is rerouted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is labeled", "unit_id": "u024318", "pair_id": "u024318-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024318-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a73e2c9b820ec15a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a6", "a4", "a10", "a7", "a13", "a11", "a8", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024328-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is localized. Talc is not fuzzed. Obsidian is not signed. Pumice is fuzzed. Quartz is not signed. Pumice is not compiled. Talc is localized. Pumice is not signed. Quartz is not fuzzed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is not reverted provided that it is obsolete. Section 2: a build is obsolete provided that it is fuzzed. Section 3: a build is not flaky provided that it is localized. Section 4: a build is flaky provided that it is compiled. Section 5: a build is not obsolete provided that it is not localized. Section 6: a build is reverted provided that it is obsolete. Section 1 lapses for a build if it is not signed. Section 6 lapses for a build if it is signed. Section 5 lapses for a build if it is not localized. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is signed. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Pumice is reverted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024328", "pair_id": "u024328-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024328-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "46d2f8997a6a5ae7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024328-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is localized. Talc is not fuzzed. Obsidian is not signed. Pumice is localized. Pumice is fuzzed. Quartz is not signed. Pumice is not compiled. Talc is localized. Pumice is not signed. Quartz is not fuzzed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is not reverted provided that it is obsolete. Section 2: a build is obsolete provided that it is fuzzed. Section 3: a build is not flaky provided that it is localized. Section 4: a build is flaky provided that it is compiled. Section 5: a build is not obsolete provided that it is not localized. Section 6: a build is reverted provided that it is obsolete. Section 1 lapses for a build if it is not signed. Section 6 lapses for a build if it is signed. Section 5 lapses for a build if it is not localized. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is signed. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Pumice is reverted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024328", "pair_id": "u024328-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024328-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "258d1ef5681570c8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024328-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is localized. Talc is not fuzzed. Obsidian is not signed. Pumice is fuzzed. Quartz is not signed. Pumice is not compiled. Talc is localized. Pumice is not signed. Quartz is not fuzzed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is obsolete: then it is not reverted. Policy II. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is obsolete. Policy III. Suppose that build is localized: then it is not flaky. Policy IV. Suppose that build is compiled: then it is flaky. Policy V. Suppose that build is not localized: then it is not obsolete. Policy VI. Suppose that build is obsolete: then it is reverted. Policy I is waived if that build is not signed. Policy VI is waived if that build is signed. Policy V is waived if that build is not localized. Policy IV is waived if that build is signed. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Pumice is reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024328", "pair_id": "u024328-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024328-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "46d2f8997a6a5ae7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024328-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is localized. Talc is not fuzzed. Obsidian is not signed. Pumice is localized. Pumice is fuzzed. Quartz is not signed. Pumice is not compiled. Talc is localized. Pumice is not signed. Quartz is not fuzzed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is obsolete: then it is not reverted. Policy II. Suppose that build is fuzzed: then it is obsolete. Policy III. Suppose that build is localized: then it is not flaky. Policy IV. Suppose that build is compiled: then it is flaky. Policy V. Suppose that build is not localized: then it is not obsolete. Policy VI. Suppose that build is obsolete: then it is reverted. Policy I is waived if that build is not signed. Policy VI is waived if that build is signed. Policy V is waived if that build is not localized. Policy IV is waived if that build is signed. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Pumice is reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024328", "pair_id": "u024328-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024328-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "258d1ef5681570c8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024353-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is a homeowner. Anouk is not indebted. Dagny has no escrow account. Folke has a credit rating of 7. Folke has no escrow account. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk is a homeowner. Ingrid has a credit rating of 84.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is creditworthy provided that it has no escrow account. Section 2: a borrower is garnished provided that it has a credit rating of 80 or lower. Section 3: a borrower is not garnished provided that it is indebted. Section 4: a borrower is not creditworthy provided that it is not a homeowner. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Anouk is garnished. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024353", "pair_id": "u024353-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024353-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "78ff65887943baf9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024353-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is a homeowner. Anouk is not indebted. Dagny has no escrow account. Folke has a credit rating of 7. Folke has no escrow account. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk is a homeowner. Ingrid has a credit rating of 84.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is creditworthy provided that it has an escrow account. Section 2: a borrower is garnished provided that it has a credit rating of 80 or lower. Section 3: a borrower is not garnished provided that it is indebted. Section 4: a borrower is not creditworthy provided that it is not a homeowner. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Anouk is garnished. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024353", "pair_id": "u024353-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024353-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ac430da151a45853", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024353-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is a homeowner. Anouk is not indebted. Dagny has no escrow account. Folke has a credit rating of 7. Folke has no escrow account. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk is a homeowner. Ingrid has a credit rating of 84.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has no escrow account, it then is creditworthy. #2 Each time a borrower has a credit rating of 80 or below, it then is garnished. #3 Each time a borrower is indebted, it then is not garnished. #4 Each time a borrower is not a homeowner, it then is not creditworthy. #2 yields to #3. #4 yields to #1. Question: Do the terms above show that Anouk is garnished?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024353", "pair_id": "u024353-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024353-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "78ff65887943baf9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024353-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is a homeowner. Anouk is not indebted. Dagny has no escrow account. Folke has a credit rating of 7. Folke has no escrow account. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk is a homeowner. Ingrid has a credit rating of 84.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then is creditworthy. #2 Each time a borrower has a credit rating of 80 or below, it then is garnished. #3 Each time a borrower is indebted, it then is not garnished. #4 Each time a borrower is not a homeowner, it then is not creditworthy. #2 yields to #3. #4 yields to #1. Question: Do the terms above show that Anouk is garnished?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024353", "pair_id": "u024353-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024353-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ac430da151a45853", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024359-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja has a chaperone. Cosima is not pregnant. Cosima has a chaperone. Cosima is not contagious. Vilja is not pregnant.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is not pregnant, thus it is allergic. Provision 2: when the patient here is contagious, thus it is not rescheduled. Provision 3: when the patient here is allergic, thus it is fasting. Provision 4: when the patient here is allergic, thus it is sedated. Provision 5: when the patient here has a chaperone, thus it is not allergic. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Would it be right to say that Vilja is allergic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024359", "pair_id": "u024359-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024359-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1b212813887e85a1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u024359-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja has a chaperone. Cosima is not pregnant. Cosima has a chaperone. Cosima is not contagious. Vilja is not pregnant.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is pregnant, thus it is allergic. Provision 2: when the patient here is contagious, thus it is not rescheduled. Provision 3: when the patient here is allergic, thus it is fasting. Provision 4: when the patient here is allergic, thus it is sedated. Provision 5: when the patient here has a chaperone, thus it is not allergic. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Would it be right to say that Vilja is allergic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024359", "pair_id": "u024359-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024359-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "25c989ff44962929", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u024359-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja has a chaperone. Cosima is not pregnant. Cosima has a chaperone. Cosima is not contagious. Vilja is not pregnant.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is not pregnant, it thereby is allergic. Point B. If said patient is contagious, it thereby is not rescheduled. Point C. If said patient is allergic, it thereby is fasting. Point D. If said patient is allergic, it thereby is sedated. Point E. If said patient has a chaperone, it thereby is not allergic. Point A supersedes Point E. Question: Statement: Vilja is allergic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024359", "pair_id": "u024359-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024359-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1b212813887e85a1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u024359-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja has a chaperone. Cosima is not pregnant. Cosima has a chaperone. Cosima is not contagious. Vilja is not pregnant.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby is allergic. Point B. If said patient is contagious, it thereby is not rescheduled. Point C. If said patient is allergic, it thereby is fasting. Point D. If said patient is allergic, it thereby is sedated. Point E. If said patient has a chaperone, it thereby is not allergic. Point A supersedes Point E. Question: Statement: Vilja is allergic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024359", "pair_id": "u024359-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024359-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "25c989ff44962929", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u024359-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja has a chaperone. Cosima is not pregnant. Cosima has a chaperone. Cosima is not contagious. Vilja is not pregnant.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is not pregnant, so it is allergic. No. 2 While the given patient is contagious, so it is not rescheduled. No. 3 While the given patient is allergic, so it is fasting. No. 4 While the given patient is allergic, so it is sedated. No. 5 While the given patient has a chaperone, so it is not allergic. No. 1 wins over No. 5. Question: Is the claim \"Vilja is allergic\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024359", "pair_id": "u024359-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024359-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1b212813887e85a1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u024359-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja has a chaperone. Cosima is not pregnant. Cosima has a chaperone. Cosima is not contagious. Vilja is not pregnant.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is allergic. No. 2 While the given patient is contagious, so it is not rescheduled. No. 3 While the given patient is allergic, so it is fasting. No. 4 While the given patient is allergic, so it is sedated. No. 5 While the given patient has a chaperone, so it is not allergic. No. 1 wins over No. 5. Question: Is the claim \"Vilja is allergic\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024359", "pair_id": "u024359-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024359-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "25c989ff44962929", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u024365-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Fomalhaut is not translational. Aldebaran is not translational. Mirach has a milestone total of 58. Mirach is not translational. Capella has no seed funding. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Mirach has a review mark of 74. Capella is translational.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has a patent filing: then it is budgeted. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has a milestone total smaller than 79: then it is resubmitted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it has a steering committee. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has a review mark no lower than 86: then it is collaborative. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is multicenter: then it has a postdoc. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is collaborative: then it has a field site. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it is not shortlisted. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal has a milestone total no lower than 79: then it is theoretical. Policy IX. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is preregistered. Policy X. Suppose that proposal has a postdoc: then it is cofunded. Policy XI. Suppose that proposal has a review mark smaller than 86: then it has a patent filing. Policy XII. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it is endorsed. Policy XIII. Suppose that proposal is resubmitted: then it is peer reviewed. Policy XIV. Suppose that proposal is embargoed: then it is interdisciplinary. Policy XV. Suppose that proposal is translational: then it is embargoed. Policy VII is waived if that proposal is multicenter. Policy XIV is waived if that proposal is multicenter. Policy I is waived if that proposal is translational. Question: Which choice is right for Capella?", "options": ["is peer reviewed", "is endorsed", "has a field site", "is budgeted", "is cofunded", "is interdisciplinary"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is interdisciplinary", "unit_id": "u024365", "pair_id": "u024365-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024365-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cf4d807a9ca68169", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a14", "a16", "a9", "a7", "a11", "a12"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024365-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Fomalhaut is not translational. Capella is multicenter. Aldebaran is not translational. Mirach has a milestone total of 58. Mirach is not translational. Capella has no seed funding. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Mirach has a review mark of 74. Capella is translational.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has a patent filing: then it is budgeted. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has a milestone total smaller than 79: then it is resubmitted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it has a steering committee. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has a review mark no lower than 86: then it is collaborative. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is multicenter: then it has a postdoc. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is collaborative: then it has a field site. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it is not shortlisted. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal has a milestone total no lower than 79: then it is theoretical. Policy IX. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is preregistered. Policy X. Suppose that proposal has a postdoc: then it is cofunded. Policy XI. Suppose that proposal has a review mark smaller than 86: then it has a patent filing. Policy XII. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it is endorsed. Policy XIII. Suppose that proposal is resubmitted: then it is peer reviewed. Policy XIV. Suppose that proposal is embargoed: then it is interdisciplinary. Policy XV. Suppose that proposal is translational: then it is embargoed. Policy VII is waived if that proposal is multicenter. Policy XIV is waived if that proposal is multicenter. Policy I is waived if that proposal is translational. Question: Which choice is right for Capella?", "options": ["is peer reviewed", "is endorsed", "has a field site", "is budgeted", "is cofunded", "is interdisciplinary"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is cofunded", "unit_id": "u024365", "pair_id": "u024365-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024365-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "30f1957dc091a25a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a14", "a16", "a9", "a7", "a11", "a12"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024387-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora has a pulse rate of 27. Zora is contagious. Zora is ambulatory. Zora has a mobility rank of 68. Zora is not anemic.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is vaccinated: then it has a caregiver. Policy II. Suppose that patient is not anemic: then it has no pacemaker. Policy III. Suppose that patient has a pulse rate no higher than 40: then it is not vaccinated. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a pulse rate higher than 13: then it is not symptomatic. Policy V. Suppose that patient is vaccinated: then it has no caregiver. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is ambulatory: then it is not diabetic. Policy VII. Suppose that patient has a pulse rate higher than 32: then it is vaccinated. Policy VIII. Suppose that patient is anemic: then it is symptomatic. Policy III is waived if that patient has a mobility rank no lower than 88. Policy I is waived if that patient is not contagious. Policy V is waived if that patient is anemic. Policy V is waived if that patient is contagious. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy V. Question: Is it so that Zora has a caregiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024387", "pair_id": "u024387-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024387-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3047361768a7b45f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024387-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora has a pulse rate of 27. Zora is contagious. Zora is ambulatory. Zora has a mobility rank of 68. Zora is not anemic.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is vaccinated: then it has a caregiver. Policy II. Suppose that patient is not anemic: then it has no pacemaker. Policy III. Suppose that patient has a pulse rate no higher than 40: then it is not vaccinated. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a pulse rate higher than 88: then it is not symptomatic. Policy V. Suppose that patient is vaccinated: then it has no caregiver. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is ambulatory: then it is not diabetic. Policy VII. Suppose that patient has a pulse rate higher than 32: then it is vaccinated. Policy VIII. Suppose that patient is anemic: then it is symptomatic. Policy III is waived if that patient has a mobility rank no lower than 88. Policy I is waived if that patient is not contagious. Policy V is waived if that patient is anemic. Policy V is waived if that patient is contagious. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy V. Question: Is it so that Zora has a caregiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024387", "pair_id": "u024387-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024387-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "401a6522db8e0781", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024389-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is a depositor. Bastien is foreclosed. Folke is vetted. Bastien has no collateral. Folke is underwritten. Folke has collateral. Hamid is a homeowner. Bastien is not a depositor. Hamid is underwritten. Ilse is underwritten. Folke is a homeowner. Folke has an escrow account. Ilse has no collateral. Hamid has no cosigner. Bastien is vetted. Hamid has no escrow account. Folke is not foreclosed. Hamid is not foreclosed. Folke is not bankrupt. Bastien is bankrupt. Bastien has no cosigner. Folke has a cosigner. Bastien is a homeowner. Hamid is not a depositor.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is vetted, and has a cosigner, that borrower has a lien. Item B. When the borrower is bankrupt, and is vetted, that borrower is not prequalified. Item C. When the borrower has a guarantor, and is vetted, that borrower is amortized. Item D. When the borrower has a guarantor, and is vetted, and is foreclosed, that borrower is not amortized. Item E. When the borrower is a homeowner, and has an escrow account, that borrower is not garnished. Item F. When the borrower has a lien, and has a cosigner, that borrower has a guarantor. Item C is suspended when the borrower is a depositor, and is underwritten. Item B is suspended when the borrower has collateral. Question: Can one infer that Folke is amortized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024389", "pair_id": "u024389-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/16/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024389-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3ba509b973badd5d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u024389-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is a depositor. Bastien is foreclosed. Folke is vetted. Bastien has no collateral. Folke is underwritten. Folke has collateral. Hamid is a homeowner. Bastien is not a depositor. Hamid is underwritten. Ilse is underwritten. Folke is a homeowner. Folke has an escrow account. Ilse has no collateral. Hamid has no cosigner. Bastien is vetted. Hamid has no escrow account. Folke is foreclosed. Hamid is not foreclosed. Folke is not bankrupt. Bastien is bankrupt. Bastien has no cosigner. Folke has a cosigner. Bastien is a homeowner. Hamid is not a depositor.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is vetted, and has a cosigner, that borrower has a lien. Item B. When the borrower is bankrupt, and is vetted, that borrower is not prequalified. Item C. When the borrower has a guarantor, and is vetted, that borrower is amortized. Item D. When the borrower has a guarantor, and is vetted, and is foreclosed, that borrower is not amortized. Item E. When the borrower is a homeowner, and has an escrow account, that borrower is not garnished. Item F. When the borrower has a lien, and has a cosigner, that borrower has a guarantor. Item C is suspended when the borrower is a depositor, and is underwritten. Item B is suspended when the borrower has collateral. Question: Can one infer that Folke is amortized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024389", "pair_id": "u024389-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/16/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024389-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "44623c45a6c1a11f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u024447-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek has a caregiver. Xenia has a mobility rank of 38. Benedek has a mobility rank of 81.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient has no caregiver, that patient is pregnant. Item B. When the patient is anemic, that patient is not waitlisted. Item C. When the patient has a mobility rank of no less than 82, that patient is not pregnant. Item D. When the patient has a mobility rank of no more than 25, that patient is diabetic. Item E. When the patient is not anemic, that patient is vaccinated. Question: Can one infer that Benedek is not pregnant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024447", "pair_id": "u024447-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024447-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a799391c2fa5445f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024447-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek has a caregiver. Xenia has a mobility rank of 38. Benedek has a mobility rank of 81.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient has no caregiver, that patient is pregnant. Item B. When the patient is anemic, that patient is not waitlisted. Item C. When the patient has a mobility rank of no less than 80, that patient is not pregnant. Item D. When the patient has a mobility rank of no more than 25, that patient is diabetic. Item E. When the patient is not anemic, that patient is vaccinated. Question: Can one infer that Benedek is not pregnant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024447", "pair_id": "u024447-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024447-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "252bda824ed661f5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024453-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not headhunted. Ivo has a notice period of 95. Ivo has an aptitude quotient of 10. Ivo is eligible. Ivo is not unionized. Ivo has a commute radius of 6.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has no signing bonus plus has a notice period higher than 86: then it is licensed. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a commute radius higher than 43: then it has no diploma. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is unionized plus has a portfolio: then it is relocating. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is eligible: then it has a diploma. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has a signing bonus plus has a notice period no higher than 86: then it is not licensed. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is headhunted plus has a notice period no higher than 21: then it has no signing bonus. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate has a notice period higher than 74 plus has an aptitude quotient smaller than 48 plus has a commute radius smaller than 52: then it has a signing bonus. Policy VII is waived if that candidate is headhunted plus has a seniority step smaller than 49. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy VII. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. Question: Is it so that Ivo is licensed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024453", "pair_id": "u024453-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024453-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "07b4976b54c52b34", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024453-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not headhunted. Ivo has a notice period of 95. Ivo has an aptitude quotient of 10. Ivo is eligible. Ivo is not unionized. Ivo has a commute radius of 6.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a signing bonus plus has a notice period higher than 86: then it is licensed. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a commute radius higher than 43: then it has no diploma. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is unionized plus has a portfolio: then it is relocating. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is eligible: then it has a diploma. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has a signing bonus plus has a notice period no higher than 86: then it is not licensed. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is headhunted plus has a notice period no higher than 21: then it has no signing bonus. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate has a notice period higher than 74 plus has an aptitude quotient smaller than 48 plus has a commute radius smaller than 52: then it has a signing bonus. Policy VII is waived if that candidate is headhunted plus has a seniority step smaller than 49. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy VII. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. Question: Is it so that Ivo is licensed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024453", "pair_id": "u024453-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024453-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0643f4c6b424857c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024467-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda has a notice period of 31. Sigrid has a diploma. Hedda has no diploma. Sigrid is a veteran. Hedda has a seniority step of 33. Sigrid is probationary. Ivo has a diploma. Sigrid has a notice period of 95. Sigrid is a graduate. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 70. Ivo is bonded. Sigrid is not bonded. Ivo has a commute radius of 90. Sigrid has a seniority step of 85.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is onboarded, thus it has a signing bonus. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a notice period at or above 89 while has a commute radius at or below 73, thus it is sponsored. Provision 3: when the candidate here has a notice period at or above 89 while has an aptitude quotient at or above 33 while has a seniority step at or above 54, thus it is interviewed. Provision 4: when the candidate here has a notice period at or above 89 while is probationary, thus it has a mentor. Provision 5: when the candidate here has a notice period at or above 89 while has a commute radius beyond 73 while has a seniority step at or above 34, thus it is recommended. Provision 6: when the candidate here has a notice period at or above 89 while has a diploma, thus it has a background screening. Provision 7: when the candidate here has a notice period at or above 89 while is a graduate, thus it is seasoned. Provision 7 has no effect when the candidate here is a veteran. Provision 6 has no effect when the candidate here is a graduate. Provision 5 has no effect when the candidate here is bonded. Provision 3 has no effect when the candidate here is probationary. Question: Which one describes Sigrid?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is interviewed", "has a mentor", "is recommended", "has a background screening", "is sponsored"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a mentor", "unit_id": "u024467", "pair_id": "u024467-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024467-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3029ecb68cf74302", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a12", "a16", "a2", "a7", "a14"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024467-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda has a notice period of 31. Sigrid has a diploma. Hedda has no diploma. Sigrid is a veteran. Hedda has a seniority step of 33. Sigrid is not probationary. Ivo has a diploma. Sigrid has a notice period of 95. Sigrid is a graduate. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 70. Ivo is bonded. Sigrid is not bonded. Ivo has a commute radius of 90. Sigrid has a seniority step of 85.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is onboarded, thus it has a signing bonus. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a notice period at or above 89 while has a commute radius at or below 73, thus it is sponsored. Provision 3: when the candidate here has a notice period at or above 89 while has an aptitude quotient at or above 33 while has a seniority step at or above 54, thus it is interviewed. Provision 4: when the candidate here has a notice period at or above 89 while is probationary, thus it has a mentor. Provision 5: when the candidate here has a notice period at or above 89 while has a commute radius beyond 73 while has a seniority step at or above 34, thus it is recommended. Provision 6: when the candidate here has a notice period at or above 89 while has a diploma, thus it has a background screening. Provision 7: when the candidate here has a notice period at or above 89 while is a graduate, thus it is seasoned. Provision 7 has no effect when the candidate here is a veteran. Provision 6 has no effect when the candidate here is a graduate. Provision 5 has no effect when the candidate here is bonded. Provision 3 has no effect when the candidate here is probationary. Question: Which one describes Sigrid?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is interviewed", "has a mentor", "is recommended", "has a background screening", "is sponsored"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is interviewed", "unit_id": "u024467", "pair_id": "u024467-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024467-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9fbf1607d8775a42", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a12", "a16", "a2", "a7", "a14"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024467-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda has a notice period of 31. Sigrid has a diploma. Hedda has no diploma. Sigrid is a veteran. Hedda has a seniority step of 33. Sigrid is probationary. Ivo has a diploma. Sigrid has a notice period of 95. Sigrid is a graduate. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 70. Ivo is bonded. Sigrid is not bonded. Ivo has a commute radius of 90. Sigrid has a seniority step of 85.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is onboarded, it thereby has a signing bonus. Point B. If said candidate has a notice period of minimum 89 and further has a commute radius of maximum 73, it thereby is sponsored. Point C. If said candidate has a notice period of minimum 89 and further has an aptitude quotient of minimum 33 and further has a seniority step of minimum 54, it thereby is interviewed. Point D. If said candidate has a notice period of minimum 89 and further is probationary, it thereby has a mentor. Point E. If said candidate has a notice period of minimum 89 and further has a commute radius in excess of 73 and further has a seniority step of minimum 34, it thereby is recommended. Point F. If said candidate has a notice period of minimum 89 and further has a diploma, it thereby has a background screening. Point G. If said candidate has a notice period of minimum 89 and further is a graduate, it thereby is seasoned. Point G is cancelled if said candidate is a veteran. Point F is cancelled if said candidate is a graduate. Point E is cancelled if said candidate is bonded. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is probationary. Question: Which choice is true for Sigrid?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is interviewed", "has a mentor", "is recommended", "has a background screening", "is sponsored"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a mentor", "unit_id": "u024467", "pair_id": "u024467-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024467-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3029ecb68cf74302", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a12", "a16", "a2", "a7", "a14"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024467-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hedda has a notice period of 31. Sigrid has a diploma. Hedda has no diploma. Sigrid is a veteran. Hedda has a seniority step of 33. Sigrid is not probationary. Ivo has a diploma. Sigrid has a notice period of 95. Sigrid is a graduate. Sigrid has an aptitude quotient of 70. Ivo is bonded. Sigrid is not bonded. Ivo has a commute radius of 90. Sigrid has a seniority step of 85.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is onboarded, it thereby has a signing bonus. Point B. If said candidate has a notice period of minimum 89 and further has a commute radius of maximum 73, it thereby is sponsored. Point C. If said candidate has a notice period of minimum 89 and further has an aptitude quotient of minimum 33 and further has a seniority step of minimum 54, it thereby is interviewed. Point D. If said candidate has a notice period of minimum 89 and further is probationary, it thereby has a mentor. Point E. If said candidate has a notice period of minimum 89 and further has a commute radius in excess of 73 and further has a seniority step of minimum 34, it thereby is recommended. Point F. If said candidate has a notice period of minimum 89 and further has a diploma, it thereby has a background screening. Point G. If said candidate has a notice period of minimum 89 and further is a graduate, it thereby is seasoned. Point G is cancelled if said candidate is a veteran. Point F is cancelled if said candidate is a graduate. Point E is cancelled if said candidate is bonded. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is probationary. Question: Which choice is true for Sigrid?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is interviewed", "has a mentor", "is recommended", "has a background screening", "is sponsored"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is interviewed", "unit_id": "u024467", "pair_id": "u024467-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024467-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9fbf1607d8775a42", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a4", "a12", "a16", "a2", "a7", "a14"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024572-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar is notarized. Mica is obsolete. Mica is linted. Schist is merged. Galena is not merged. Schist is localized. Mica has a migration script. Mica is localized. Mica is notarized.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is minified provided that it is reproducible as well as is not merged. Section 2: a build is profiled provided that it is reproducible as well as is not obsolete. Section 3: a build is versioned provided that it is reproducible as well as is merged. Section 4: a build is not tagged provided that it is linted as well as is localized. Section 5: a build is fuzzed provided that it is reproducible as well as is obsolete. Section 6: a build is not minified provided that it has a migration script. Section 7: a build is reverted provided that it is not notarized. Section 8: a build is reproducible provided that it is not tagged as well as has a migration script. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Which statement fits Mica?", "options": ["is fuzzed", "is versioned", "is profiled", "is minified"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is fuzzed", "unit_id": "u024572", "pair_id": "u024572-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024572-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d86471bf7e752baf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a2", "a11", "a0"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u024572-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar is notarized. Mica is obsolete. Mica is linted. Schist is merged. Galena is not merged. Schist is localized. Mica has a migration script. Mica is localized. Mica is not notarized.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is minified provided that it is reproducible as well as is not merged. Section 2: a build is profiled provided that it is reproducible as well as is not obsolete. Section 3: a build is versioned provided that it is reproducible as well as is merged. Section 4: a build is not tagged provided that it is linted as well as is localized. Section 5: a build is fuzzed provided that it is reproducible as well as is obsolete. Section 6: a build is not minified provided that it has a migration script. Section 7: a build is reverted provided that it is not notarized. Section 8: a build is reproducible provided that it is not tagged as well as has a migration script. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Which statement fits Mica?", "options": ["is fuzzed", "is versioned", "is profiled", "is minified"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is fuzzed", "unit_id": "u024572", "pair_id": "u024572-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024572-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "28786c900dd3fc4a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a2", "a11", "a0"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u024572-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar is notarized. Mica is obsolete. Mica is linted. Schist is merged. Galena is not merged. Schist is localized. Mica has a migration script. Mica is localized. Mica is notarized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is reproducible and additionally is not merged, it then is minified. #2 Each time a build is reproducible and additionally is not obsolete, it then is profiled. #3 Each time a build is reproducible and additionally is merged, it then is versioned. #4 Each time a build is linted and additionally is localized, it then is not tagged. #5 Each time a build is reproducible and additionally is obsolete, it then is fuzzed. #6 Each time a build has a migration script, it then is not minified. #7 Each time a build is not notarized, it then is reverted. #8 Each time a build is not tagged and additionally has a migration script, it then is reproducible. #1 yields to #6. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Mica?", "options": ["is fuzzed", "is versioned", "is profiled", "is minified"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is fuzzed", "unit_id": "u024572", "pair_id": "u024572-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024572-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d86471bf7e752baf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a2", "a11", "a0"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u024572-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar is notarized. Mica is obsolete. Mica is linted. Schist is merged. Galena is not merged. Schist is localized. Mica has a migration script. Mica is localized. Mica is not notarized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is reproducible and additionally is not merged, it then is minified. #2 Each time a build is reproducible and additionally is not obsolete, it then is profiled. #3 Each time a build is reproducible and additionally is merged, it then is versioned. #4 Each time a build is linted and additionally is localized, it then is not tagged. #5 Each time a build is reproducible and additionally is obsolete, it then is fuzzed. #6 Each time a build has a migration script, it then is not minified. #7 Each time a build is not notarized, it then is reverted. #8 Each time a build is not tagged and additionally has a migration script, it then is reproducible. #1 yields to #6. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Mica?", "options": ["is fuzzed", "is versioned", "is profiled", "is minified"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is fuzzed", "unit_id": "u024572", "pair_id": "u024572-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024572-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "28786c900dd3fc4a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a2", "a11", "a0"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u024585-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is symptomatic. Vilja is not discharged. Zora is discharged. Wendel has a pulse rate of 44. Elif is diabetic. Elif has a pulse rate of 22. Vilja is not sedated. Vilja is not asthmatic. Wendel has a fever reading of 18. Elif is asthmatic. Vilja has a pulse rate of 80. Elif is sedated. Wendel is not diabetic. Zora has a fever reading of 84. Wendel is discharged. Vilja has a fever reading of 44. Vilja is diabetic. Zora is symptomatic. Zora has a pulse rate of 91. Zora is not asthmatic.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient has a fever reading below 64 and has a pulse rate above 18, then it is fasting. (2) If a patient is not discharged and has a fever reading of at most 43, then it has a caregiver. (3) If a patient is not vaccinated and is asthmatic and is symptomatic, then it has an interpreter. (4) If a patient is not vaccinated and is not asthmatic and is not contagious, then it has no interpreter. (5) If a patient is diabetic, then it is not contagious. (6) If a patient is fasting and is not sedated, then it is not vaccinated. Question: Is it true that Vilja has an interpreter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024585", "pair_id": "u024585-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024585-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "7b5e224dd1ff27f4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024585-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is symptomatic. Vilja is not discharged. Zora is discharged. Wendel has a pulse rate of 44. Elif is diabetic. Elif has a pulse rate of 22. Vilja is not sedated. Vilja is not asthmatic. Wendel has a fever reading of 18. Elif is asthmatic. Vilja has a pulse rate of 80. Elif is sedated. Wendel is not diabetic. Zora has a fever reading of 84. Wendel is discharged. Vilja has a fever reading of 11. Vilja is diabetic. Zora is symptomatic. Zora has a pulse rate of 91. Zora is not asthmatic.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient has a fever reading below 64 and has a pulse rate above 18, then it is fasting. (2) If a patient is not discharged and has a fever reading of at most 43, then it has a caregiver. (3) If a patient is not vaccinated and is asthmatic and is symptomatic, then it has an interpreter. (4) If a patient is not vaccinated and is not asthmatic and is not contagious, then it has no interpreter. (5) If a patient is diabetic, then it is not contagious. (6) If a patient is fasting and is not sedated, then it is not vaccinated. Question: Is it true that Vilja has an interpreter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024585", "pair_id": "u024585-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024585-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "ec9ea3a148eac40d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024585-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is symptomatic. Vilja is not discharged. Zora is discharged. Wendel has a pulse rate of 44. Elif is diabetic. Elif has a pulse rate of 22. Vilja is not sedated. Vilja is not asthmatic. Wendel has a fever reading of 18. Elif is asthmatic. Vilja has a pulse rate of 80. Elif is sedated. Wendel is not diabetic. Zora has a fever reading of 84. Wendel is discharged. Vilja has a fever reading of 44. Vilja is diabetic. Zora is symptomatic. Zora has a pulse rate of 91. Zora is not asthmatic.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a fever reading under 64 and also has a pulse rate over 18, it also is fasting. Clause 2: once any patient is not discharged and also has a fever reading of 43 or less, it also has a caregiver. Clause 3: once any patient is not vaccinated and also is asthmatic and also is symptomatic, it also has an interpreter. Clause 4: once any patient is not vaccinated and also is not asthmatic and also is not contagious, it also has no interpreter. Clause 5: once any patient is diabetic, it also is not contagious. Clause 6: once any patient is fasting and also is not sedated, it also is not vaccinated. Question: Does it follow that Vilja has an interpreter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024585", "pair_id": "u024585-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024585-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "7b5e224dd1ff27f4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024585-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is symptomatic. Vilja is not discharged. Zora is discharged. Wendel has a pulse rate of 44. Elif is diabetic. Elif has a pulse rate of 22. Vilja is not sedated. Vilja is not asthmatic. Wendel has a fever reading of 18. Elif is asthmatic. Vilja has a pulse rate of 80. Elif is sedated. Wendel is not diabetic. Zora has a fever reading of 84. Wendel is discharged. Vilja has a fever reading of 11. Vilja is diabetic. Zora is symptomatic. Zora has a pulse rate of 91. Zora is not asthmatic.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a fever reading under 64 and also has a pulse rate over 18, it also is fasting. Clause 2: once any patient is not discharged and also has a fever reading of 43 or less, it also has a caregiver. Clause 3: once any patient is not vaccinated and also is asthmatic and also is symptomatic, it also has an interpreter. Clause 4: once any patient is not vaccinated and also is not asthmatic and also is not contagious, it also has no interpreter. Clause 5: once any patient is diabetic, it also is not contagious. Clause 6: once any patient is fasting and also is not sedated, it also is not vaccinated. Question: Does it follow that Vilja has an interpreter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024585", "pair_id": "u024585-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024585-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "ec9ea3a148eac40d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024609-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is retired. Celeste is disputed. Viggo is uninsurable. Xaver is not uninsurable. Xaver has no dashcam. Celeste is not retired.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is not reimbursed provided that it has an adjuster as well as has a dashcam. Section 2: a policyholder is appraised provided that it is retired as well as is uninsurable. Section 3: a policyholder is reimbursed provided that it is disputed. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Celeste is bundled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024609", "pair_id": "u024609-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024609-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ee35fd9ce2da6a51", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024609-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is retired. Celeste is disputed. Viggo is uninsurable. Xaver is not uninsurable. Xaver has no dashcam. Celeste is not retired. Celeste has no dashcam.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is not reimbursed provided that it has an adjuster as well as has a dashcam. Section 2: a policyholder is appraised provided that it is retired as well as is uninsurable. Section 3: a policyholder is reimbursed provided that it is disputed. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Celeste is bundled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024609", "pair_id": "u024609-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024609-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c6b4ea39ab4cbc35", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024609-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is retired. Celeste is disputed. Viggo is uninsurable. Xaver is not uninsurable. Xaver has no dashcam. Celeste is not retired.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster plus has a dashcam: then it is not reimbursed. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is retired plus is uninsurable: then it is appraised. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is disputed: then it is reimbursed. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Celeste is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024609", "pair_id": "u024609-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024609-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ee35fd9ce2da6a51", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024609-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver is retired. Celeste is disputed. Viggo is uninsurable. Xaver is not uninsurable. Xaver has no dashcam. Celeste is not retired. Celeste has no dashcam.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster plus has a dashcam: then it is not reimbursed. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is retired plus is uninsurable: then it is appraised. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is disputed: then it is reimbursed. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Celeste is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024609", "pair_id": "u024609-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024609-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c6b4ea39ab4cbc35", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024630-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar has a postdoc. Hadar has a field site. Hadar has no ethics clearance. Hadar is budgeted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it is longitudinal. Section 2: a proposal is not endorsed provided that it is peer reviewed as well as has ethics clearance as well as is translational. Section 3: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it has a postdoc. Section 4: a proposal is endorsed provided that it is peer reviewed as well as has no ethics clearance. Section 5: a proposal is collaborative provided that it has no field site as well as is budgeted. Section 6: a proposal is translational provided that it has a postdoc. Question: Hadar is endorsed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024630", "pair_id": "u024630-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024630-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "8609bdd2b8108429", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u024630-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar has a postdoc. Hadar has a field site. Hadar has ethics clearance. Hadar is budgeted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it is longitudinal. Section 2: a proposal is not endorsed provided that it is peer reviewed as well as has ethics clearance as well as is translational. Section 3: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it has a postdoc. Section 4: a proposal is endorsed provided that it is peer reviewed as well as has no ethics clearance. Section 5: a proposal is collaborative provided that it has no field site as well as is budgeted. Section 6: a proposal is translational provided that it has a postdoc. Question: Hadar is endorsed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024630", "pair_id": "u024630-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024630-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "4eef4a3da6e0c885", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u024632-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is not delayed. Odile is fragile. Thilo has a parcel volume of 97. Odile has a parcel volume of 44. Thilo is fragile.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is delayed, it also has a locker slot. Clause 2: once any parcel has a parcel volume of 89 or more, it also has no locker slot. Clause 3: once any parcel is fragile, it also is perishable. Clause 4: once any parcel is fragile, it also is not perishable. Clause 4 overrides Clause 3. Clause 2 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Thilo has a locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024632", "pair_id": "u024632-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024632-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "46bd897cb60910bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024632-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is not delayed. Odile is fragile. Thilo has a parcel volume of 97. Odile has a parcel volume of 44. Thilo is fragile.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is delayed, it also has a locker slot. Clause 2: once any parcel has a parcel volume under 89, it also has no locker slot. Clause 3: once any parcel is fragile, it also is perishable. Clause 4: once any parcel is fragile, it also is not perishable. Clause 4 overrides Clause 3. Clause 2 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Thilo has a locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024632", "pair_id": "u024632-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024632-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4bb3a1e7cf1101a4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024632-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is not delayed. Odile is fragile. Thilo has a parcel volume of 97. Odile has a parcel volume of 44. Thilo is fragile.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is delayed, that parcel has a locker slot. Item B. When the parcel has a parcel volume of no less than 89, that parcel has no locker slot. Item C. When the parcel is fragile, that parcel is perishable. Item D. When the parcel is fragile, that parcel is not perishable. Item D outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Thilo has a locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024632", "pair_id": "u024632-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024632-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "46bd897cb60910bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024632-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is not delayed. Odile is fragile. Thilo has a parcel volume of 97. Odile has a parcel volume of 44. Thilo is fragile.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is delayed, that parcel has a locker slot. Item B. When the parcel has a parcel volume of less than 89, that parcel has no locker slot. Item C. When the parcel is fragile, that parcel is perishable. Item D. When the parcel is fragile, that parcel is not perishable. Item D outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Thilo has a locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024632", "pair_id": "u024632-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024632-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4bb3a1e7cf1101a4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024685-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is theoretical. Aldebaran is not cofunded. Aldebaran has a field site. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Aldebaran is not embargoed. Deneb has a field site. Deneb is not shortlisted. Aldebaran is shortlisted. Deneb is not multicenter. Deneb is not cofunded. Deneb is not renewed. Aldebaran is not theoretical.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a field site and is theoretical, then it is not endorsed. (2) If a proposal has a field site and is not shortlisted, then it is endorsed. (3) If a proposal is cofunded and is embargoed, then it has industry backing. (1) is void if the proposal is theoretical and is renewed. (3) is void if the proposal is multicenter. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Deneb is not endorsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024685", "pair_id": "u024685-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024685-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "61f58b667b9229c1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u024685-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is theoretical. Aldebaran is not cofunded. Aldebaran has a field site. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Aldebaran is not embargoed. Deneb has a field site. Deneb is not shortlisted. Aldebaran is shortlisted. Deneb is not multicenter. Deneb is not cofunded. Deneb is not renewed. Aldebaran is not theoretical.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a field site and is theoretical, then it is not endorsed. (2) If a proposal has a field site and is shortlisted, then it is endorsed. (3) If a proposal is cofunded and is embargoed, then it has industry backing. (1) is void if the proposal is theoretical and is renewed. (3) is void if the proposal is multicenter. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Deneb is not endorsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024685", "pair_id": "u024685-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024685-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d4eb3191ea9c0249", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u024685-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is theoretical. Aldebaran is not cofunded. Aldebaran has a field site. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Aldebaran is not embargoed. Deneb has a field site. Deneb is not shortlisted. Aldebaran is shortlisted. Deneb is not multicenter. Deneb is not cofunded. Deneb is not renewed. Aldebaran is not theoretical.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has a field site, and is theoretical, that proposal is not endorsed. Item B. When the proposal has a field site, and is not shortlisted, that proposal is endorsed. Item C. When the proposal is cofunded, and is embargoed, that proposal has industry backing. Item A is suspended when the proposal is theoretical, and is renewed. Item C is suspended when the proposal is multicenter. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Deneb is not endorsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024685", "pair_id": "u024685-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024685-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "61f58b667b9229c1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u024685-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is theoretical. Aldebaran is not cofunded. Aldebaran has a field site. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Aldebaran is not embargoed. Deneb has a field site. Deneb is not shortlisted. Aldebaran is shortlisted. Deneb is not multicenter. Deneb is not cofunded. Deneb is not renewed. Aldebaran is not theoretical.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has a field site, and is theoretical, that proposal is not endorsed. Item B. When the proposal has a field site, and is shortlisted, that proposal is endorsed. Item C. When the proposal is cofunded, and is embargoed, that proposal has industry backing. Item A is suspended when the proposal is theoretical, and is renewed. Item C is suspended when the proposal is multicenter. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Deneb is not endorsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024685", "pair_id": "u024685-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024685-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d4eb3191ea9c0249", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u024691-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not a homeowner. Folke is pensioned. Folke has a risk tier of 65. Folke has collateral.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower has a risk tier of at least 59 and has no collateral, then it is not overdrawn. (2) If a borrower has a risk tier of at least 66 and has collateral and is not a homeowner, then it is overdrawn. (3) If a borrower is not pensioned, then it has an escrow account. Question: Is it true that Folke is overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024691", "pair_id": "u024691-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024691-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "abc6f3d3c9f0d98d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024691-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is not a homeowner. Folke is pensioned. Folke has a risk tier of 65. Folke has collateral.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower has a risk tier of at least 59 and has no collateral, then it is not overdrawn. (2) If a borrower has a risk tier of at least 59 and has collateral and is not a homeowner, then it is overdrawn. (3) If a borrower is not pensioned, then it has an escrow account. Question: Is it true that Folke is overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024691", "pair_id": "u024691-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024691-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d48e2214b4afcce4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024692-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has no barcode. Kaveh is fragile. Kaveh is not rerouted. Kaveh is not tracked. Rasmus has no barcode. Ulla has no courier. Ulla is not damaged. Ulla has a waybill. Kaveh has a waybill. Kaveh is not consolidated. Kaveh has a barcode. Rasmus is tracked. Kaveh is damaged. Kaveh is scanned. Rasmus is not rerouted. Rasmus is not fragile. Rasmus has no waybill.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel has a barcode, it also is not weighed. Clause 2: once any parcel is scanned, it also is prepaid. Clause 3: once any parcel is damaged and also is scanned, it also is labeled. Clause 4: once any parcel is weighed and also is fragile, it also is sealed. Clause 5: once any parcel has a barcode, it also is not labeled. Clause 6: once any parcel has a barcode and also is scanned, it also is not prepaid. Clause 7: once any parcel is weighed and also is consolidated and also has a courier, it also is not sealed. Clause 8: once any parcel is tracked, it also is refrigerated. Clause 9: once any parcel is prepaid and also is damaged, it also is weighed. Clause 10: once any parcel has a waybill and also is rerouted and also is consolidated, it also is not perishable. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Clause 6 overrides Clause 2. Clause 1 overrides Clause 9. Clause 4 overrides Clause 7. Question: Does it follow that Kaveh is not sealed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024692", "pair_id": "u024692-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024692-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "23d49a82d20d2006", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024692-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has no barcode. Kaveh is fragile. Kaveh is not rerouted. Kaveh is not tracked. Rasmus has no barcode. Ulla has no courier. Ulla is not damaged. Ulla has a waybill. Kaveh has a waybill. Kaveh is not consolidated. Kaveh has no barcode. Rasmus is tracked. Kaveh is damaged. Kaveh is scanned. Rasmus is not rerouted. Rasmus is not fragile. Rasmus has no waybill.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel has a barcode, it also is not weighed. Clause 2: once any parcel is scanned, it also is prepaid. Clause 3: once any parcel is damaged and also is scanned, it also is labeled. Clause 4: once any parcel is weighed and also is fragile, it also is sealed. Clause 5: once any parcel has a barcode, it also is not labeled. Clause 6: once any parcel has a barcode and also is scanned, it also is not prepaid. Clause 7: once any parcel is weighed and also is consolidated and also has a courier, it also is not sealed. Clause 8: once any parcel is tracked, it also is refrigerated. Clause 9: once any parcel is prepaid and also is damaged, it also is weighed. Clause 10: once any parcel has a waybill and also is rerouted and also is consolidated, it also is not perishable. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Clause 6 overrides Clause 2. Clause 1 overrides Clause 9. Clause 4 overrides Clause 7. Question: Does it follow that Kaveh is not sealed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024692", "pair_id": "u024692-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024692-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1222346a5e8e40ad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024728-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren is underwritten. Wiebke is underwritten. Greta is bankrupt. Evren is bankrupt. Greta is not underwritten. Greta has a cosigner. Evren is a depositor. Greta is not prequalified. Wiebke is a depositor. Evren is not prequalified. Greta is a depositor.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is bankrupt, it also is audited. Clause 2: once any borrower is not a depositor, it also has a lien. Clause 3: once any borrower is bankrupt and also has a cosigner, it also is not audited. Clause 4: once any borrower is creditworthy and also is underwritten, it also has a mortgage. Clause 5: once any borrower is underwritten, it also has no lien. Clause 6: once any borrower is creditworthy and also is not underwritten and also is not prequalified, it also has collateral. Clause 7: once any borrower is audited, it also is creditworthy. Clause 8: once any borrower is underwritten, it also is indebted. Clause 9: once any borrower is not prequalified, it also has an escrow account. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is underwritten. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Clause 5 overrides Clause 2. Question: Which of these is true of Evren?", "options": ["has collateral", "has a mortgage"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a mortgage", "unit_id": "u024728", "pair_id": "u024728-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024728-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a6646df687cd0212", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024728-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren is not underwritten. Wiebke is underwritten. Greta is bankrupt. Evren is bankrupt. Greta is not underwritten. Greta has a cosigner. Evren is a depositor. Greta is not prequalified. Wiebke is a depositor. Evren is not prequalified. Greta is a depositor.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is bankrupt, it also is audited. Clause 2: once any borrower is not a depositor, it also has a lien. Clause 3: once any borrower is bankrupt and also has a cosigner, it also is not audited. Clause 4: once any borrower is creditworthy and also is underwritten, it also has a mortgage. Clause 5: once any borrower is underwritten, it also has no lien. Clause 6: once any borrower is creditworthy and also is not underwritten and also is not prequalified, it also has collateral. Clause 7: once any borrower is audited, it also is creditworthy. Clause 8: once any borrower is underwritten, it also is indebted. Clause 9: once any borrower is not prequalified, it also has an escrow account. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is underwritten. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Clause 5 overrides Clause 2. Question: Which of these is true of Evren?", "options": ["has collateral", "has a mortgage"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u024728", "pair_id": "u024728-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024728-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b8dd563cd74cab93", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a9"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024741-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid is seasoned. Mads is not seasoned. Mads is bonded. Mads is not headhunted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is not seasoned and further is headhunted, it thereby has no mentor. Point A is cancelled if said candidate has a seniority step of maximum 13. Question: Statement: Mads is bonded. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024741", "pair_id": "u024741-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024741-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d4d0371d92c2b314", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024741-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid is seasoned. Mads is not seasoned. Mads is bonded. Mads is headhunted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is not seasoned and further is headhunted, it thereby has no mentor. Point A is cancelled if said candidate has a seniority step of maximum 13. Question: Statement: Mads is bonded. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024741", "pair_id": "u024741-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024741-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a8fb8d2f33e748df", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024749-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel has no failover node. Kestrel is monitored. Cobalt has no failover node. Cobalt is not isolated. Cobalt is not patched.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is cached provided that it is not isolated as well as is monitored. Section 2: a workload is encrypted provided that it has no failover node. Section 3: a workload is not encrypted provided that it is not isolated. Section 4: a workload is mirrored provided that it is isolated as well as is monitored. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Kestrel is patched. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024749", "pair_id": "u024749-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024749-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0c2e28a5d3edc4ec", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024749-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel has no failover node. Kestrel is monitored. Cobalt has no failover node. Cobalt is not isolated. Kestrel is not patched. Cobalt is not patched.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is cached provided that it is not isolated as well as is monitored. Section 2: a workload is encrypted provided that it has no failover node. Section 3: a workload is not encrypted provided that it is not isolated. Section 4: a workload is mirrored provided that it is isolated as well as is monitored. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Kestrel is patched. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024749", "pair_id": "u024749-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024749-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "53ce6f3d4bf1adad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024750-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda has a peril factor of 2. Celeste has a premium band of 21. Edda is covered. Edda has a premium band of 13. Celeste is not a claimant. Celeste is not a smoker. Bruno is not a smoker. Bruno has a premium band of 25. Celeste has roadside assistance. Edda has a payout ceiling of 40. Edda has roadside assistance. Edda is not a claimant. Celeste is covered. Edda is a smoker. Bruno is reimbursed. Celeste has a claim frequency of 91. Bruno is not a claimant. Bruno has no dashcam. Bruno is not grandfathered. Edda has a claim frequency of 72. Edda has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has a premium discount plus has a premium band smaller than 14 plus has a dashcam: then it is not indemnified. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is a smoker: then it is not litigated. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed plus has a premium band smaller than 53: then it is bundled. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has a peril factor no higher than 29 plus has roadside assistance: then it has a premium discount. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has a premium discount plus has a premium band no lower than 14: then it is indemnified. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is covered plus has a claim frequency no lower than 73: then it has a rider. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is a smoker plus is grandfathered. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is a claimant. Policy VI is waived if that policyholder is a claimant. Question: Is it so that Edda is indemnified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024750", "pair_id": "u024750-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/19/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024750-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b4a221010a95f7c9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 48}}
{"id": "syn-u024750-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda has a peril factor of 2. Celeste has a premium band of 21. Edda is covered. Edda has a premium band of 13. Celeste is not a claimant. Celeste is not a smoker. Bruno is not a smoker. Bruno has a premium band of 25. Celeste has roadside assistance. Edda has a payout ceiling of 40. Edda has roadside assistance. Edda is not a claimant. Celeste is covered. Edda is a smoker. Bruno is reimbursed. Celeste has a claim frequency of 91. Bruno is not a claimant. Bruno has no dashcam. Bruno is not grandfathered. Edda has a claim frequency of 85. Edda has a dashcam.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has a premium discount plus has a premium band smaller than 14 plus has a dashcam: then it is not indemnified. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is a smoker: then it is not litigated. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed plus has a premium band smaller than 53: then it is bundled. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder has a peril factor no higher than 29 plus has roadside assistance: then it has a premium discount. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has a premium discount plus has a premium band no lower than 14: then it is indemnified. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is covered plus has a claim frequency no lower than 73: then it has a rider. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is a smoker plus is grandfathered. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is a claimant. Policy VI is waived if that policyholder is a claimant. Question: Is it so that Edda is indemnified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024750", "pair_id": "u024750-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/19/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024750-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b33ced420c2f483c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 48}}
{"id": "syn-u024757-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is not disputed. Viggo has no dashcam. Dmitri has a rider. Dmitri has no deductible waiver. Viggo is uninsurable. Edda is not reinstated. Edda is uninsurable. Dmitri is not litigated. Dmitri has an adjuster. Viggo is not disputed. Edda is inspected. Viggo is lapsed. Edda is not lapsed. Edda has a rider. Dmitri is uninsurable. Edda is indemnified. Viggo is not litigated. Edda is not litigated. Edda is not grandfathered. Edda has no adjuster. Dmitri is not inspected. Dmitri is lapsed. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo has no adjuster.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is a claimant provided that it is reimbursed as well as is grandfathered. Section 2: a policyholder is retired provided that it is appraised as well as has a deductible waiver. Section 3: a policyholder has a premium discount provided that it has a rider as well as is inspected. Section 4: a policyholder is covered provided that it is uninsurable. Section 5: a policyholder is not appraised provided that it is reinstated. Section 6: a policyholder has a beneficiary provided that it has a rider as well as is grandfathered as well as is indemnified. Section 7: a policyholder is reimbursed provided that it has a rider as well as is reinstated as well as is inspected. Section 8: a policyholder is appraised provided that it has a rider as well as is lapsed. Section 9: a policyholder is not retired provided that it has an adjuster. Section 3 lapses for a policyholder if it is grandfathered. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it is grandfathered. Section 6 lapses for a policyholder if it has a dashcam. Section 3 lapses for a policyholder if it is disputed. Section 1 lapses for a policyholder if it is litigated. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Which statement fits Edda?", "options": ["is reimbursed", "has a beneficiary", "is appraised", "has a premium discount"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a premium discount", "unit_id": "u024757", "pair_id": "u024757-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024757-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec25fb2ffaf99923", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a13", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024757-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is not disputed. Viggo has no dashcam. Dmitri has a rider. Dmitri has no deductible waiver. Viggo is uninsurable. Edda is not reinstated. Edda is not uninsurable. Dmitri is not litigated. Dmitri has an adjuster. Viggo is not disputed. Edda is inspected. Viggo is lapsed. Edda is not lapsed. Edda has a rider. Dmitri is uninsurable. Edda is indemnified. Viggo is not litigated. Edda is not litigated. Edda is not grandfathered. Edda has no adjuster. Dmitri is not inspected. Dmitri is lapsed. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo has no adjuster.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is a claimant provided that it is reimbursed as well as is grandfathered. Section 2: a policyholder is retired provided that it is appraised as well as has a deductible waiver. Section 3: a policyholder has a premium discount provided that it has a rider as well as is inspected. Section 4: a policyholder is covered provided that it is uninsurable. Section 5: a policyholder is not appraised provided that it is reinstated. Section 6: a policyholder has a beneficiary provided that it has a rider as well as is grandfathered as well as is indemnified. Section 7: a policyholder is reimbursed provided that it has a rider as well as is reinstated as well as is inspected. Section 8: a policyholder is appraised provided that it has a rider as well as is lapsed. Section 9: a policyholder is not retired provided that it has an adjuster. Section 3 lapses for a policyholder if it is grandfathered. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it is grandfathered. Section 6 lapses for a policyholder if it has a dashcam. Section 3 lapses for a policyholder if it is disputed. Section 1 lapses for a policyholder if it is litigated. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Which statement fits Edda?", "options": ["is reimbursed", "has a beneficiary", "is appraised", "has a premium discount"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a premium discount", "unit_id": "u024757", "pair_id": "u024757-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024757-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7d262e21bed2312b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a13", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024757-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is not disputed. Viggo has no dashcam. Dmitri has a rider. Dmitri has no deductible waiver. Viggo is uninsurable. Edda is not reinstated. Edda is uninsurable. Dmitri is not litigated. Dmitri has an adjuster. Viggo is not disputed. Edda is inspected. Viggo is lapsed. Edda is not lapsed. Edda has a rider. Dmitri is uninsurable. Edda is indemnified. Viggo is not litigated. Edda is not litigated. Edda is not grandfathered. Edda has no adjuster. Dmitri is not inspected. Dmitri is lapsed. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo has no adjuster.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed plus is grandfathered: then it is a claimant. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is appraised plus has a deductible waiver: then it is retired. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a rider plus is inspected: then it has a premium discount. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is uninsurable: then it is covered. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is reinstated: then it is not appraised. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder has a rider plus is grandfathered plus is indemnified: then it has a beneficiary. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder has a rider plus is reinstated plus is inspected: then it is reimbursed. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder has a rider plus is lapsed: then it is appraised. Policy IX. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster: then it is not retired. Policy III is waived if that policyholder is grandfathered. Policy II is waived if that policyholder is grandfathered. Policy VI is waived if that policyholder has a dashcam. Policy III is waived if that policyholder is disputed. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is litigated. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy II. Question: Which choice is right for Edda?", "options": ["is reimbursed", "has a beneficiary", "is appraised", "has a premium discount"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a premium discount", "unit_id": "u024757", "pair_id": "u024757-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024757-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec25fb2ffaf99923", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a13", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024757-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is not disputed. Viggo has no dashcam. Dmitri has a rider. Dmitri has no deductible waiver. Viggo is uninsurable. Edda is not reinstated. Edda is not uninsurable. Dmitri is not litigated. Dmitri has an adjuster. Viggo is not disputed. Edda is inspected. Viggo is lapsed. Edda is not lapsed. Edda has a rider. Dmitri is uninsurable. Edda is indemnified. Viggo is not litigated. Edda is not litigated. Edda is not grandfathered. Edda has no adjuster. Dmitri is not inspected. Dmitri is lapsed. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo has no adjuster.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed plus is grandfathered: then it is a claimant. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is appraised plus has a deductible waiver: then it is retired. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a rider plus is inspected: then it has a premium discount. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is uninsurable: then it is covered. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is reinstated: then it is not appraised. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder has a rider plus is grandfathered plus is indemnified: then it has a beneficiary. Policy VII. Suppose that policyholder has a rider plus is reinstated plus is inspected: then it is reimbursed. Policy VIII. Suppose that policyholder has a rider plus is lapsed: then it is appraised. Policy IX. Suppose that policyholder has an adjuster: then it is not retired. Policy III is waived if that policyholder is grandfathered. Policy II is waived if that policyholder is grandfathered. Policy VI is waived if that policyholder has a dashcam. Policy III is waived if that policyholder is disputed. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is litigated. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy II. Question: Which choice is right for Edda?", "options": ["is reimbursed", "has a beneficiary", "is appraised", "has a premium discount"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a premium discount", "unit_id": "u024757", "pair_id": "u024757-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024757-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7d262e21bed2312b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a13", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024757-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is not disputed. Viggo has no dashcam. Dmitri has a rider. Dmitri has no deductible waiver. Viggo is uninsurable. Edda is not reinstated. Edda is uninsurable. Dmitri is not litigated. Dmitri has an adjuster. Viggo is not disputed. Edda is inspected. Viggo is lapsed. Edda is not lapsed. Edda has a rider. Dmitri is uninsurable. Edda is indemnified. Viggo is not litigated. Edda is not litigated. Edda is not grandfathered. Edda has no adjuster. Dmitri is not inspected. Dmitri is lapsed. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo has no adjuster.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed and additionally is grandfathered, it then is a claimant. #2 Each time a policyholder is appraised and additionally has a deductible waiver, it then is retired. #3 Each time a policyholder has a rider and additionally is inspected, it then has a premium discount. #4 Each time a policyholder is uninsurable, it then is covered. #5 Each time a policyholder is reinstated, it then is not appraised. #6 Each time a policyholder has a rider and additionally is grandfathered and additionally is indemnified, it then has a beneficiary. #7 Each time a policyholder has a rider and additionally is reinstated and additionally is inspected, it then is reimbursed. #8 Each time a policyholder has a rider and additionally is lapsed, it then is appraised. #9 Each time a policyholder has an adjuster, it then is not retired. #3 is set aside if a policyholder is grandfathered. #2 is set aside if a policyholder is grandfathered. #6 is set aside if a policyholder has a dashcam. #3 is set aside if a policyholder is disputed. #1 is set aside if a policyholder is litigated. #8 yields to #5. #2 yields to #9. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Edda?", "options": ["is reimbursed", "has a beneficiary", "is appraised", "has a premium discount"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a premium discount", "unit_id": "u024757", "pair_id": "u024757-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024757-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec25fb2ffaf99923", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a13", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024757-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dmitri is not disputed. Viggo has no dashcam. Dmitri has a rider. Dmitri has no deductible waiver. Viggo is uninsurable. Edda is not reinstated. Edda is not uninsurable. Dmitri is not litigated. Dmitri has an adjuster. Viggo is not disputed. Edda is inspected. Viggo is lapsed. Edda is not lapsed. Edda has a rider. Dmitri is uninsurable. Edda is indemnified. Viggo is not litigated. Edda is not litigated. Edda is not grandfathered. Edda has no adjuster. Dmitri is not inspected. Dmitri is lapsed. Viggo is reinstated. Viggo has no adjuster.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed and additionally is grandfathered, it then is a claimant. #2 Each time a policyholder is appraised and additionally has a deductible waiver, it then is retired. #3 Each time a policyholder has a rider and additionally is inspected, it then has a premium discount. #4 Each time a policyholder is uninsurable, it then is covered. #5 Each time a policyholder is reinstated, it then is not appraised. #6 Each time a policyholder has a rider and additionally is grandfathered and additionally is indemnified, it then has a beneficiary. #7 Each time a policyholder has a rider and additionally is reinstated and additionally is inspected, it then is reimbursed. #8 Each time a policyholder has a rider and additionally is lapsed, it then is appraised. #9 Each time a policyholder has an adjuster, it then is not retired. #3 is set aside if a policyholder is grandfathered. #2 is set aside if a policyholder is grandfathered. #6 is set aside if a policyholder has a dashcam. #3 is set aside if a policyholder is disputed. #1 is set aside if a policyholder is litigated. #8 yields to #5. #2 yields to #9. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Edda?", "options": ["is reimbursed", "has a beneficiary", "is appraised", "has a premium discount"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a premium discount", "unit_id": "u024757", "pair_id": "u024757-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024757-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7d262e21bed2312b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a13", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u024833-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una has no roadside assistance. Una is not a claimant. Viggo is bundled. Una is not appraised. Viggo is not disputed. Una has a rider. Zdenek is bundled. Viggo is appraised. Una is indemnified. Una is bundled. Viggo has no rider. Agata is a claimant. Una is disputed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is subrogated and likewise is bundled, so it is covered. No. 2 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 3 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance and likewise has a rider and likewise is appraised, so it has no deductible waiver. No. 4 While the given policyholder is indemnified, so it is subrogated. No. 5 While the given policyholder is subrogated and likewise is not disputed, so it is not covered. No. 5 wins over No. 1. No. 3 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Una is covered\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024833", "pair_id": "u024833-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024833-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7425fe04a3bb3c35", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u024833-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una has no roadside assistance. Una is not a claimant. Viggo is bundled. Una is not appraised. Viggo is not disputed. Una has a rider. Zdenek is bundled. Viggo is appraised. Una is indemnified. Una is bundled. Viggo has no rider. Agata is a claimant. Una is disputed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is subrogated and likewise is bundled, so it is covered. No. 2 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 3 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance and likewise has a rider and likewise is appraised, so it has no deductible waiver. No. 4 While the given policyholder is indemnified, so it is subrogated. No. 5 While the given policyholder is subrogated and likewise is disputed, so it is not covered. No. 5 wins over No. 1. No. 3 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Una is covered\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024833", "pair_id": "u024833-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024833-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8168e65fd0cd4950", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u024840-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is hypertensive. Vilja is rescheduled. Florin is not diabetic. Vilja is not asthmatic. Vilja is hypertensive. Florin has a fever reading of 72. Florin is not fasting. Vilja is not vaccinated. Xenia is not vaccinated. Florin is not rescheduled. Vilja is not fasting. Florin is ambulatory. Florin is not bedridden. Florin is asthmatic. Xenia is diabetic. Xenia is not bedridden. Xenia is not hypertensive. Vilja has a pain level of 82. Florin has a pain level of 7. Xenia is asthmatic. Vilja is not waitlisted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is admitted, and has a pain level of no more than 72, that patient has a pacemaker. Item B. When the patient is admitted, and has a pain level of no more than 72, and has a fever reading of no less than 57, that patient has no pacemaker. Item C. When the patient is pregnant, that patient is not triaged. Item D. When the patient is asthmatic, that patient is referred. Item E. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient is admitted. Item F. When the patient is hypertensive, and is fasting, and is waitlisted, that patient is not referred. Item G. When the patient is diabetic, that patient is not admitted. Item H. When the patient is rescheduled, that patient is triaged. Item I. When the patient is ambulatory, and is vaccinated, that patient has a chaperone. Item F is suspended when the patient is bedridden. Item H is suspended when the patient has a pain level of no more than 35. Item A is suspended when the patient has a mobility rank of no more than 45, and has a fever reading of less than 17. Item A outranks Item B. Item C outranks Item H. Item D outranks Item F. Item G outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Florin has a pacemaker?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024840", "pair_id": "u024840-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024840-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1c44c2f82730ad40", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u024840-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin is hypertensive. Vilja is rescheduled. Florin is not diabetic. Vilja is not asthmatic. Vilja is hypertensive. Florin has a fever reading of 72. Florin is not fasting. Vilja is not vaccinated. Xenia is not vaccinated. Florin is not rescheduled. Vilja is not fasting. Florin is ambulatory. Florin is not bedridden. Florin is asthmatic. Xenia is diabetic. Xenia is not bedridden. Xenia is not hypertensive. Vilja has a pain level of 82. Florin has a pain level of 7. Xenia is asthmatic. Vilja is not waitlisted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is admitted, and has a pain level of more than 72, that patient has a pacemaker. Item B. When the patient is admitted, and has a pain level of no more than 72, and has a fever reading of no less than 57, that patient has no pacemaker. Item C. When the patient is pregnant, that patient is not triaged. Item D. When the patient is asthmatic, that patient is referred. Item E. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient is admitted. Item F. When the patient is hypertensive, and is fasting, and is waitlisted, that patient is not referred. Item G. When the patient is diabetic, that patient is not admitted. Item H. When the patient is rescheduled, that patient is triaged. Item I. When the patient is ambulatory, and is vaccinated, that patient has a chaperone. Item F is suspended when the patient is bedridden. Item H is suspended when the patient has a pain level of no more than 35. Item A is suspended when the patient has a mobility rank of no more than 45, and has a fever reading of less than 17. Item A outranks Item B. Item C outranks Item H. Item D outranks Item F. Item G outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Florin has a pacemaker?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024840", "pair_id": "u024840-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024840-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d22d11e1b1021b38", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u024869-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia has a parcel volume of 60. Saskia is fragile. Saskia has a postal zone of 1. Saskia has no locker slot. Saskia has a courier.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is labeled provided that it is fragile as well as has a postal zone of 22 or higher as well as has a parcel volume exceeding 21. Section 2: a parcel is not scanned provided that it has a courier. Section 3: a parcel is not labeled provided that it is fragile as well as has a postal zone lower than 22 as well as has a weight class exceeding 47. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it has a locker slot. Question: Saskia is labeled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024869", "pair_id": "u024869-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024869-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f88d2dfc719de3ea", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024869-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia has a parcel volume of 60. Saskia is fragile. Saskia has a postal zone of 1. Saskia has no locker slot. Saskia has a courier. Saskia has a weight class of 70.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is labeled provided that it is fragile as well as has a postal zone of 22 or higher as well as has a parcel volume exceeding 21. Section 2: a parcel is not scanned provided that it has a courier. Section 3: a parcel is not labeled provided that it is fragile as well as has a postal zone lower than 22 as well as has a weight class exceeding 47. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it has a locker slot. Question: Saskia is labeled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024869", "pair_id": "u024869-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024869-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "527b5d72247268bb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024889-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Olek is relocating. Lotte is not headhunted. Hedda has no mentor. Hedda is not interviewed. Lotte is not interviewed. Jasna is not a graduate. Jasna is not sponsored. Lotte has no background screening. Olek has no diploma. Hedda is sponsored. Jasna is interviewed. Hedda is not fingerprinted. Olek is certified. Olek has no background screening. Lotte is not certified. Jasna has no mentor. Hedda is certified. Jasna has a diploma. Lotte is not relocating. Jasna has a background screening. Jasna is certified. Lotte is eligible. Jasna is licensed. Jasna is fingerprinted. Hedda is relocating. Hedda has no diploma. Olek has no mentor. Lotte is not licensed. Lotte is not a graduate. Jasna is headhunted.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is unionized and is interviewed, then it has a portfolio. (2) If a candidate is a graduate, then it is a veteran. (3) If a candidate is licensed, then it is unionized. (4) If a candidate has a portfolio and has a background screening, then it is recommended. (5) If a candidate has a portfolio and is sponsored and has a mentor, then it is freelance. (6) If a candidate has a portfolio and is eligible, then it is bilingual. (7) If a candidate has a portfolio and is relocating and is certified, then it is seasoned. (8) If a candidate has a portfolio and has a diploma and is fingerprinted, then it is bonded. (7) is void if the candidate is headhunted. (6) is void if the candidate is fingerprinted. (7) is void if the candidate is eligible. (8) is void if the candidate has a background screening. Question: Which option holds for Jasna?", "options": ["is bilingual", "is recommended", "is freelance", "is bonded", "is seasoned"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is recommended", "unit_id": "u024889", "pair_id": "u024889-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/19/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024889-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2f728064ae05e225", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a4", "a6", "a3", "a8"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u024889-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Olek is relocating. Lotte is not headhunted. Hedda has no mentor. Hedda is not interviewed. Lotte is not interviewed. Jasna is not a graduate. Jasna is not sponsored. Lotte has no background screening. Olek has no diploma. Hedda is sponsored. Jasna is interviewed. Hedda is not fingerprinted. Olek is certified. Olek has no background screening. Lotte is not certified. Jasna has no mentor. Hedda is certified. Jasna has a diploma. Lotte is not relocating. Jasna has no background screening. Jasna is certified. Lotte is eligible. Jasna is licensed. Jasna is fingerprinted. Hedda is relocating. Hedda has no diploma. Olek has no mentor. Lotte is not licensed. Lotte is not a graduate. Jasna is headhunted.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is unionized and is interviewed, then it has a portfolio. (2) If a candidate is a graduate, then it is a veteran. (3) If a candidate is licensed, then it is unionized. (4) If a candidate has a portfolio and has a background screening, then it is recommended. (5) If a candidate has a portfolio and is sponsored and has a mentor, then it is freelance. (6) If a candidate has a portfolio and is eligible, then it is bilingual. (7) If a candidate has a portfolio and is relocating and is certified, then it is seasoned. (8) If a candidate has a portfolio and has a diploma and is fingerprinted, then it is bonded. (7) is void if the candidate is headhunted. (6) is void if the candidate is fingerprinted. (7) is void if the candidate is eligible. (8) is void if the candidate has a background screening. Question: Which option holds for Jasna?", "options": ["is bilingual", "is recommended", "is freelance", "is bonded", "is seasoned"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is bonded", "unit_id": "u024889", "pair_id": "u024889-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/19/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024889-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "46fc80880c7e786a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a4", "a6", "a3", "a8"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u024889-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Olek is relocating. Lotte is not headhunted. Hedda has no mentor. Hedda is not interviewed. Lotte is not interviewed. Jasna is not a graduate. Jasna is not sponsored. Lotte has no background screening. Olek has no diploma. Hedda is sponsored. Jasna is interviewed. Hedda is not fingerprinted. Olek is certified. Olek has no background screening. Lotte is not certified. Jasna has no mentor. Hedda is certified. Jasna has a diploma. Lotte is not relocating. Jasna has a background screening. Jasna is certified. Lotte is eligible. Jasna is licensed. Jasna is fingerprinted. Hedda is relocating. Hedda has no diploma. Olek has no mentor. Lotte is not licensed. Lotte is not a graduate. Jasna is headhunted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is unionized and also is interviewed, it also has a portfolio. Clause 2: once any candidate is a graduate, it also is a veteran. Clause 3: once any candidate is licensed, it also is unionized. Clause 4: once any candidate has a portfolio and also has a background screening, it also is recommended. Clause 5: once any candidate has a portfolio and also is sponsored and also has a mentor, it also is freelance. Clause 6: once any candidate has a portfolio and also is eligible, it also is bilingual. Clause 7: once any candidate has a portfolio and also is relocating and also is certified, it also is seasoned. Clause 8: once any candidate has a portfolio and also has a diploma and also is fingerprinted, it also is bonded. Clause 7 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is headhunted. Clause 6 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is fingerprinted. Clause 7 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is eligible. Clause 8 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has a background screening. Question: Which of these is true of Jasna?", "options": ["is bilingual", "is recommended", "is freelance", "is bonded", "is seasoned"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is recommended", "unit_id": "u024889", "pair_id": "u024889-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/19/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024889-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2f728064ae05e225", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a4", "a6", "a3", "a8"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u024889-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Olek is relocating. Lotte is not headhunted. Hedda has no mentor. Hedda is not interviewed. Lotte is not interviewed. Jasna is not a graduate. Jasna is not sponsored. Lotte has no background screening. Olek has no diploma. Hedda is sponsored. Jasna is interviewed. Hedda is not fingerprinted. Olek is certified. Olek has no background screening. Lotte is not certified. Jasna has no mentor. Hedda is certified. Jasna has a diploma. Lotte is not relocating. Jasna has no background screening. Jasna is certified. Lotte is eligible. Jasna is licensed. Jasna is fingerprinted. Hedda is relocating. Hedda has no diploma. Olek has no mentor. Lotte is not licensed. Lotte is not a graduate. Jasna is headhunted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is unionized and also is interviewed, it also has a portfolio. Clause 2: once any candidate is a graduate, it also is a veteran. Clause 3: once any candidate is licensed, it also is unionized. Clause 4: once any candidate has a portfolio and also has a background screening, it also is recommended. Clause 5: once any candidate has a portfolio and also is sponsored and also has a mentor, it also is freelance. Clause 6: once any candidate has a portfolio and also is eligible, it also is bilingual. Clause 7: once any candidate has a portfolio and also is relocating and also is certified, it also is seasoned. Clause 8: once any candidate has a portfolio and also has a diploma and also is fingerprinted, it also is bonded. Clause 7 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is headhunted. Clause 6 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is fingerprinted. Clause 7 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is eligible. Clause 8 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate has a background screening. Question: Which of these is true of Jasna?", "options": ["is bilingual", "is recommended", "is freelance", "is bonded", "is seasoned"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is bonded", "unit_id": "u024889", "pair_id": "u024889-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/19/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024889-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "46fc80880c7e786a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a4", "a6", "a3", "a8"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u024889-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Olek is relocating. Lotte is not headhunted. Hedda has no mentor. Hedda is not interviewed. Lotte is not interviewed. Jasna is not a graduate. Jasna is not sponsored. Lotte has no background screening. Olek has no diploma. Hedda is sponsored. Jasna is interviewed. Hedda is not fingerprinted. Olek is certified. Olek has no background screening. Lotte is not certified. Jasna has no mentor. Hedda is certified. Jasna has a diploma. Lotte is not relocating. Jasna has a background screening. Jasna is certified. Lotte is eligible. Jasna is licensed. Jasna is fingerprinted. Hedda is relocating. Hedda has no diploma. Olek has no mentor. Lotte is not licensed. Lotte is not a graduate. Jasna is headhunted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is unionized, and is interviewed, that candidate has a portfolio. Item B. When the candidate is a graduate, that candidate is a veteran. Item C. When the candidate is licensed, that candidate is unionized. Item D. When the candidate has a portfolio, and has a background screening, that candidate is recommended. Item E. When the candidate has a portfolio, and is sponsored, and has a mentor, that candidate is freelance. Item F. When the candidate has a portfolio, and is eligible, that candidate is bilingual. Item G. When the candidate has a portfolio, and is relocating, and is certified, that candidate is seasoned. Item H. When the candidate has a portfolio, and has a diploma, and is fingerprinted, that candidate is bonded. Item G is suspended when the candidate is headhunted. Item F is suspended when the candidate is fingerprinted. Item G is suspended when the candidate is eligible. Item H is suspended when the candidate has a background screening. Question: What applies to Jasna?", "options": ["is bilingual", "is recommended", "is freelance", "is bonded", "is seasoned"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is recommended", "unit_id": "u024889", "pair_id": "u024889-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/19/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024889-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2f728064ae05e225", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a4", "a6", "a3", "a8"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u024889-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Olek is relocating. Lotte is not headhunted. Hedda has no mentor. Hedda is not interviewed. Lotte is not interviewed. Jasna is not a graduate. Jasna is not sponsored. Lotte has no background screening. Olek has no diploma. Hedda is sponsored. Jasna is interviewed. Hedda is not fingerprinted. Olek is certified. Olek has no background screening. Lotte is not certified. Jasna has no mentor. Hedda is certified. Jasna has a diploma. Lotte is not relocating. Jasna has no background screening. Jasna is certified. Lotte is eligible. Jasna is licensed. Jasna is fingerprinted. Hedda is relocating. Hedda has no diploma. Olek has no mentor. Lotte is not licensed. Lotte is not a graduate. Jasna is headhunted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is unionized, and is interviewed, that candidate has a portfolio. Item B. When the candidate is a graduate, that candidate is a veteran. Item C. When the candidate is licensed, that candidate is unionized. Item D. When the candidate has a portfolio, and has a background screening, that candidate is recommended. Item E. When the candidate has a portfolio, and is sponsored, and has a mentor, that candidate is freelance. Item F. When the candidate has a portfolio, and is eligible, that candidate is bilingual. Item G. When the candidate has a portfolio, and is relocating, and is certified, that candidate is seasoned. Item H. When the candidate has a portfolio, and has a diploma, and is fingerprinted, that candidate is bonded. Item G is suspended when the candidate is headhunted. Item F is suspended when the candidate is fingerprinted. Item G is suspended when the candidate is eligible. Item H is suspended when the candidate has a background screening. Question: What applies to Jasna?", "options": ["is bilingual", "is recommended", "is freelance", "is bonded", "is seasoned"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is bonded", "unit_id": "u024889", "pair_id": "u024889-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/19/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024889-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "46fc80880c7e786a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a7", "a4", "a6", "a3", "a8"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u024899-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is minified. Pumice is not experimental. Pumice is obsolete. Talc is obsolete. Obsidian is not documented. Obsidian is not minified. Pumice is not reverted. Pumice is minified. Talc is experimental. Talc is not flaky. Obsidian is flaky. Obsidian is reverted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is experimental, that build has no migration script. Item B. When the build has no migration script, and is minified, that build has a feature toggle. Item C. When the build is documented, that build is not backported. Item D. When the build is not obsolete, that build is backported. Item E. When the build has no migration script, and is not minified, that build has no feature toggle. Item F. When the build has no feature toggle, and is obsolete, and is not flaky, that build is versioned. Item G. When the build is not documented, and is reverted, and is not flaky, that build has a migration script. Item C outranks Item D. Item E outranks Item B. Item A outranks Item G. Question: Can one infer that Talc has a feature toggle?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024899", "pair_id": "u024899-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024899-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "686ae018fabb686c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024899-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is minified. Pumice is not experimental. Pumice is obsolete. Talc is obsolete. Obsidian is not documented. Obsidian is not minified. Pumice is not reverted. Pumice is minified. Talc is experimental. Talc is not flaky. Obsidian is flaky. Obsidian is reverted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is experimental, that build has no migration script. Item B. When the build has no migration script, and is minified, that build has a feature toggle. Item C. When the build is documented, that build is not backported. Item D. When the build is obsolete, that build is backported. Item E. When the build has no migration script, and is not minified, that build has no feature toggle. Item F. When the build has no feature toggle, and is obsolete, and is not flaky, that build is versioned. Item G. When the build is not documented, and is reverted, and is not flaky, that build has a migration script. Item C outranks Item D. Item E outranks Item B. Item A outranks Item G. Question: Can one infer that Talc has a feature toggle?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024899", "pair_id": "u024899-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024899-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "811c4cdd6c23a7d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024910-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is mirrored. Juno is patched. Sierra has a latency budget of 93. Juno has a failover node. Quasar is not mirrored. Sierra is not patched. Quasar has a replica count of 13. Quasar has a CPU quota of 50. Nimbus has a replica count of 3. Sierra has a replica count of 84. Juno has a CPU quota of 65. Quasar is not patched. Sierra has a CPU quota of 86. Sierra has a failover node.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is sharded, it then is not provisioned. #2 Each time a workload has a CPU quota of 87 or above, it then is not sharded. #3 Each time a workload has a replica count of 43 or above, it then is virtualized. #4 Each time a workload is not sharded, it then is not autoscaled. #5 Each time a workload is not patched, it then is not virtualized. #6 Each time a workload is virtualized, it then is encrypted. #7 Each time a workload is isolated, it then is autoscaled. #8 Each time a workload has no failover node, it then is isolated. #9 Each time a workload has a snapshot, it then is not encrypted. #10 Each time a workload is not autoscaled, it then is not sandboxed. #11 Each time a workload has a latency budget greater than 56, it then has a snapshot. #12 Each time a workload is encrypted, it then is sandboxed. #13 Each time a workload is not mirrored, it then is throttled. #4 yields to #7. #3 yields to #5. #12 yields to #10. #9 yields to #6. Question: Do the terms above show that Sierra is sandboxed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u024910", "pair_id": "u024910-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024910-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "26613df3e29c8938", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024910-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is mirrored. Juno is patched. Sierra has a latency budget of 93. Juno has a failover node. Quasar is not mirrored. Sierra is not patched. Quasar has a replica count of 13. Quasar has a CPU quota of 50. Nimbus has a replica count of 3. Sierra has a replica count of 84. Juno has a CPU quota of 65. Quasar is not patched. Sierra has a CPU quota of 86. Sierra has a failover node.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is sharded, it then is not provisioned. #2 Each time a workload has a CPU quota of 10 or above, it then is not sharded. #3 Each time a workload has a replica count of 43 or above, it then is virtualized. #4 Each time a workload is not sharded, it then is not autoscaled. #5 Each time a workload is not patched, it then is not virtualized. #6 Each time a workload is virtualized, it then is encrypted. #7 Each time a workload is isolated, it then is autoscaled. #8 Each time a workload has no failover node, it then is isolated. #9 Each time a workload has a snapshot, it then is not encrypted. #10 Each time a workload is not autoscaled, it then is not sandboxed. #11 Each time a workload has a latency budget greater than 56, it then has a snapshot. #12 Each time a workload is encrypted, it then is sandboxed. #13 Each time a workload is not mirrored, it then is throttled. #4 yields to #7. #3 yields to #5. #12 yields to #10. #9 yields to #6. Question: Do the terms above show that Sierra is sandboxed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u024910", "pair_id": "u024910-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024910-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6a5cf6f3edb58213", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u024952-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is audited. Evren has a risk tier of 28. Anouk is underwritten. Evren is underwritten. Evren has no mortgage. Evren has a debt ratio of 3. Ilse has a risk tier of 63. Evren is not audited. Anouk is not audited. Ingrid is not underwritten. Ilse is not underwritten. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 96. Anouk is overdrawn. Ilse is overdrawn. Ilse has no mortgage.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is bankrupt and has a debt ratio of at most 35, then it is not prequalified. (2) If a borrower is bankrupt and has a debt ratio above 35 and is audited, then it is prequalified. (3) If a borrower is overdrawn, then it is pensioned. (4) If a borrower is overdrawn, then it is not pensioned. (5) If a borrower is not audited, then it is not foreclosed. (6) If a borrower is audited, then it is bankrupt. (7) If a borrower has a mortgage and has a debt ratio above 35 and has a risk tier of at least 21, then it is foreclosed. (8) If a borrower is underwritten, then it is not indebted. When (4) and (3) clash, (4) prevails. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. When (7) and (5) clash, (7) prevails. Question: Is it true that Ingrid is prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024952", "pair_id": "u024952-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024952-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a2acc628f66a48c5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024952-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is audited. Evren has a risk tier of 28. Anouk is underwritten. Evren is underwritten. Evren has no mortgage. Evren has a debt ratio of 3. Ilse has a risk tier of 63. Evren is not audited. Anouk is not audited. Ingrid is not underwritten. Ilse is not underwritten. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 96. Anouk is overdrawn. Ilse is overdrawn. Ilse has no mortgage.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is bankrupt and has a debt ratio of at most 35, then it is not prequalified. (2) If a borrower is bankrupt and has a debt ratio above 35 and is audited, then it is prequalified. (3) If a borrower is overdrawn, then it is pensioned. (4) If a borrower is overdrawn, then it is not pensioned. (5) If a borrower is audited, then it is not foreclosed. (6) If a borrower is audited, then it is bankrupt. (7) If a borrower has a mortgage and has a debt ratio above 35 and has a risk tier of at least 21, then it is foreclosed. (8) If a borrower is underwritten, then it is not indebted. When (4) and (3) clash, (4) prevails. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. When (7) and (5) clash, (7) prevails. Question: Is it true that Ingrid is prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024952", "pair_id": "u024952-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024952-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d3fe41eb73b5e809", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024952-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is audited. Evren has a risk tier of 28. Anouk is underwritten. Evren is underwritten. Evren has no mortgage. Evren has a debt ratio of 3. Ilse has a risk tier of 63. Evren is not audited. Anouk is not audited. Ingrid is not underwritten. Ilse is not underwritten. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 96. Anouk is overdrawn. Ilse is overdrawn. Ilse has no mortgage.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is bankrupt and also has a debt ratio of 35 or less, it also is not prequalified. Clause 2: once any borrower is bankrupt and also has a debt ratio over 35 and also is audited, it also is prequalified. Clause 3: once any borrower is overdrawn, it also is pensioned. Clause 4: once any borrower is overdrawn, it also is not pensioned. Clause 5: once any borrower is not audited, it also is not foreclosed. Clause 6: once any borrower is audited, it also is bankrupt. Clause 7: once any borrower has a mortgage and also has a debt ratio over 35 and also has a risk tier of 21 or more, it also is foreclosed. Clause 8: once any borrower is underwritten, it also is not indebted. Clause 4 overrides Clause 3. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Clause 7 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Ingrid is prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024952", "pair_id": "u024952-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024952-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a2acc628f66a48c5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024952-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is audited. Evren has a risk tier of 28. Anouk is underwritten. Evren is underwritten. Evren has no mortgage. Evren has a debt ratio of 3. Ilse has a risk tier of 63. Evren is not audited. Anouk is not audited. Ingrid is not underwritten. Ilse is not underwritten. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 96. Anouk is overdrawn. Ilse is overdrawn. Ilse has no mortgage.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is bankrupt and also has a debt ratio of 35 or less, it also is not prequalified. Clause 2: once any borrower is bankrupt and also has a debt ratio over 35 and also is audited, it also is prequalified. Clause 3: once any borrower is overdrawn, it also is pensioned. Clause 4: once any borrower is overdrawn, it also is not pensioned. Clause 5: once any borrower is audited, it also is not foreclosed. Clause 6: once any borrower is audited, it also is bankrupt. Clause 7: once any borrower has a mortgage and also has a debt ratio over 35 and also has a risk tier of 21 or more, it also is foreclosed. Clause 8: once any borrower is underwritten, it also is not indebted. Clause 4 overrides Clause 3. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Clause 7 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Ingrid is prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024952", "pair_id": "u024952-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024952-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d3fe41eb73b5e809", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024952-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is audited. Evren has a risk tier of 28. Anouk is underwritten. Evren is underwritten. Evren has no mortgage. Evren has a debt ratio of 3. Ilse has a risk tier of 63. Evren is not audited. Anouk is not audited. Ingrid is not underwritten. Ilse is not underwritten. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 96. Anouk is overdrawn. Ilse is overdrawn. Ilse has no mortgage.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is bankrupt, and has a debt ratio of no more than 35, that borrower is not prequalified. Item B. When the borrower is bankrupt, and has a debt ratio of more than 35, and is audited, that borrower is prequalified. Item C. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower is pensioned. Item D. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower is not pensioned. Item E. When the borrower is not audited, that borrower is not foreclosed. Item F. When the borrower is audited, that borrower is bankrupt. Item G. When the borrower has a mortgage, and has a debt ratio of more than 35, and has a risk tier of no less than 21, that borrower is foreclosed. Item H. When the borrower is underwritten, that borrower is not indebted. Item D outranks Item C. Item A outranks Item B. Item G outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Ingrid is prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024952", "pair_id": "u024952-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024952-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a2acc628f66a48c5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024952-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is audited. Evren has a risk tier of 28. Anouk is underwritten. Evren is underwritten. Evren has no mortgage. Evren has a debt ratio of 3. Ilse has a risk tier of 63. Evren is not audited. Anouk is not audited. Ingrid is not underwritten. Ilse is not underwritten. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 96. Anouk is overdrawn. Ilse is overdrawn. Ilse has no mortgage.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is bankrupt, and has a debt ratio of no more than 35, that borrower is not prequalified. Item B. When the borrower is bankrupt, and has a debt ratio of more than 35, and is audited, that borrower is prequalified. Item C. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower is pensioned. Item D. When the borrower is overdrawn, that borrower is not pensioned. Item E. When the borrower is audited, that borrower is not foreclosed. Item F. When the borrower is audited, that borrower is bankrupt. Item G. When the borrower has a mortgage, and has a debt ratio of more than 35, and has a risk tier of no less than 21, that borrower is foreclosed. Item H. When the borrower is underwritten, that borrower is not indebted. Item D outranks Item C. Item A outranks Item B. Item G outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Ingrid is prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024952", "pair_id": "u024952-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024952-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d3fe41eb73b5e809", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024954-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh has a barcode. Kaveh is weighed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here has no barcode, thus it is sealed. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a barcode, thus it is labeled. Provision 3: when the parcel here is delayed, thus it is stamped. Provision 4: when the parcel here is not delayed, thus it is perishable. Provision 5: when the parcel here is not palletized, thus it is prepaid. Provision 6: when the parcel here is fragile, thus it is undeliverable. Provision 7: when the parcel here is not weighed, thus it has a courier. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is registered. Provision 7 has no effect when the parcel here is not registered. Provision 5 has no effect when the parcel here is fragile. Question: Which one describes Kaveh?", "options": ["is undeliverable", "is labeled", "is prepaid", "is perishable", "is sealed", "is stamped"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is labeled", "unit_id": "u024954", "pair_id": "u024954-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024954-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "de0155af0e4f0acc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a12", "a8", "a6", "a10", "a11"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024954-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh has no barcode. Kaveh is weighed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here has no barcode, thus it is sealed. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a barcode, thus it is labeled. Provision 3: when the parcel here is delayed, thus it is stamped. Provision 4: when the parcel here is not delayed, thus it is perishable. Provision 5: when the parcel here is not palletized, thus it is prepaid. Provision 6: when the parcel here is fragile, thus it is undeliverable. Provision 7: when the parcel here is not weighed, thus it has a courier. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is registered. Provision 7 has no effect when the parcel here is not registered. Provision 5 has no effect when the parcel here is fragile. Question: Which one describes Kaveh?", "options": ["is undeliverable", "is labeled", "is prepaid", "is perishable", "is sealed", "is stamped"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sealed", "unit_id": "u024954", "pair_id": "u024954-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024954-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "af5d30741884c65f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a12", "a8", "a6", "a10", "a11"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024954-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh has a barcode. Kaveh is weighed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel has no barcode, so it is sealed. No. 2 While the given parcel has a barcode, so it is labeled. No. 3 While the given parcel is delayed, so it is stamped. No. 4 While the given parcel is not delayed, so it is perishable. No. 5 While the given parcel is not palletized, so it is prepaid. No. 6 While the given parcel is fragile, so it is undeliverable. No. 7 While the given parcel is not weighed, so it has a courier. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given parcel is registered. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given parcel is not registered. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given parcel is fragile. Question: Select what holds for Kaveh: which option?", "options": ["is undeliverable", "is labeled", "is prepaid", "is perishable", "is sealed", "is stamped"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is labeled", "unit_id": "u024954", "pair_id": "u024954-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024954-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "de0155af0e4f0acc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a12", "a8", "a6", "a10", "a11"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024954-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh has no barcode. Kaveh is weighed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel has no barcode, so it is sealed. No. 2 While the given parcel has a barcode, so it is labeled. No. 3 While the given parcel is delayed, so it is stamped. No. 4 While the given parcel is not delayed, so it is perishable. No. 5 While the given parcel is not palletized, so it is prepaid. No. 6 While the given parcel is fragile, so it is undeliverable. No. 7 While the given parcel is not weighed, so it has a courier. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given parcel is registered. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given parcel is not registered. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given parcel is fragile. Question: Select what holds for Kaveh: which option?", "options": ["is undeliverable", "is labeled", "is prepaid", "is perishable", "is sealed", "is stamped"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sealed", "unit_id": "u024954", "pair_id": "u024954-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u024954-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "af5d30741884c65f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a12", "a8", "a6", "a10", "a11"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u024978-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is registered. Jory is refrigerated. Thilo is refrigerated. Thilo is not scanned. Jory is not registered.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is palletized provided that it is registered. Section 2: a parcel is not misrouted provided that it is palletized. Section 3: a parcel is not palletized provided that it is registered. Section 4: a parcel is labeled provided that it is refrigerated. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it is not scanned. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it is not registered. Section 2 lapses for a parcel if it is registered. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it is scanned. Question: Thilo is palletized. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024978", "pair_id": "u024978-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024978-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7ba0e43ec918c705", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u024978-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is registered. Jory is refrigerated. Thilo is not refrigerated. Thilo is not scanned. Jory is not registered.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is palletized provided that it is registered. Section 2: a parcel is not misrouted provided that it is palletized. Section 3: a parcel is not palletized provided that it is registered. Section 4: a parcel is labeled provided that it is refrigerated. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it is not scanned. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it is not registered. Section 2 lapses for a parcel if it is registered. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it is scanned. Question: Thilo is palletized. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u024978", "pair_id": "u024978-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u024978-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9625f52c0c1bb813", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u025031-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra has a latency budget of 72. Kestrel has a latency budget of 67. Kestrel is not replicated. Kestrel is not sharded. Sierra is provisioned. Sierra is not replicated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby is sandboxed. Point B. If said workload has a latency budget in excess of 29, it thereby is not mirrored. Point A is cancelled if said workload is replicated. Question: Statement: Sierra is sharded. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025031", "pair_id": "u025031-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025031-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5ae4c468ffdfbc98", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025031-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra has a latency budget of 72. Kestrel has a latency budget of 67. Kestrel is not replicated. Kestrel is not sharded. Sierra is provisioned. Sierra is not replicated. Sierra is not sharded.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby is sandboxed. Point B. If said workload has a latency budget in excess of 29, it thereby is not mirrored. Point A is cancelled if said workload is replicated. Question: Statement: Sierra is sharded. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025031", "pair_id": "u025031-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025031-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bdf97d942c5b47f6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025049-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is not delayed. Nandor is not fragile. Nandor has a delivery window of 15.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is stamped provided that it is delayed. Section 2: a parcel is not scanned provided that it has a delivery window lower than 55. Section 3: a parcel has no locker slot provided that it has a postal zone lower than 71. Section 4: a parcel is perishable provided that it has a postal zone lower than 73. Section 5: a parcel is refrigerated provided that it has a postal zone of 73 or higher. Section 6: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is rerouted. Section 7: a parcel is prepaid provided that it has a delivery window exceeding 15. Section 8: a parcel has a waybill provided that it has a delivery window of 15 or lower. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it is fragile. Question: Which statement fits Nandor?", "options": ["is refrigerated", "has a waybill", "is perishable", "is stamped", "is prepaid"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a waybill", "unit_id": "u025049", "pair_id": "u025049-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025049-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7249db408262a3b1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a8", "a0", "a2", "a12"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u025049-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is not delayed. Nandor is not fragile. Nandor has a delivery window of 33.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is stamped provided that it is delayed. Section 2: a parcel is not scanned provided that it has a delivery window lower than 55. Section 3: a parcel has no locker slot provided that it has a postal zone lower than 71. Section 4: a parcel is perishable provided that it has a postal zone lower than 73. Section 5: a parcel is refrigerated provided that it has a postal zone of 73 or higher. Section 6: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is rerouted. Section 7: a parcel is prepaid provided that it has a delivery window exceeding 15. Section 8: a parcel has a waybill provided that it has a delivery window of 15 or lower. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it is fragile. Question: Which statement fits Nandor?", "options": ["is refrigerated", "has a waybill", "is perishable", "is stamped", "is prepaid"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prepaid", "unit_id": "u025049", "pair_id": "u025049-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025049-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "edc8af974c22ff52", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a8", "a0", "a2", "a12"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u025049-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is not delayed. Nandor is not fragile. Nandor has a delivery window of 15.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it is stamped. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window smaller than 55: then it is not scanned. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a postal zone smaller than 71: then it has no locker slot. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has a postal zone smaller than 73: then it is perishable. Policy V. Suppose that parcel has a postal zone no lower than 73: then it is refrigerated. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is rerouted: then it has a barcode. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window higher than 15: then it is prepaid. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window no higher than 15: then it has a waybill. Policy I is waived if that parcel is fragile. Question: Which choice is right for Nandor?", "options": ["is refrigerated", "has a waybill", "is perishable", "is stamped", "is prepaid"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a waybill", "unit_id": "u025049", "pair_id": "u025049-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025049-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7249db408262a3b1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a8", "a0", "a2", "a12"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u025049-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is not delayed. Nandor is not fragile. Nandor has a delivery window of 33.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it is stamped. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window smaller than 55: then it is not scanned. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a postal zone smaller than 71: then it has no locker slot. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has a postal zone smaller than 73: then it is perishable. Policy V. Suppose that parcel has a postal zone no lower than 73: then it is refrigerated. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is rerouted: then it has a barcode. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window higher than 15: then it is prepaid. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window no higher than 15: then it has a waybill. Policy I is waived if that parcel is fragile. Question: Which choice is right for Nandor?", "options": ["is refrigerated", "has a waybill", "is perishable", "is stamped", "is prepaid"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prepaid", "unit_id": "u025049", "pair_id": "u025049-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025049-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "edc8af974c22ff52", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a8", "a0", "a2", "a12"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u025049-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is not delayed. Nandor is not fragile. Nandor has a delivery window of 15.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then is stamped. #2 Each time a parcel has a delivery window less than 55, it then is not scanned. #3 Each time a parcel has a postal zone less than 71, it then has no locker slot. #4 Each time a parcel has a postal zone less than 73, it then is perishable. #5 Each time a parcel has a postal zone of 73 or above, it then is refrigerated. #6 Each time a parcel is rerouted, it then has a barcode. #7 Each time a parcel has a delivery window greater than 15, it then is prepaid. #8 Each time a parcel has a delivery window of 15 or below, it then has a waybill. #1 is set aside if a parcel is fragile. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Nandor?", "options": ["is refrigerated", "has a waybill", "is perishable", "is stamped", "is prepaid"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a waybill", "unit_id": "u025049", "pair_id": "u025049-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025049-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7249db408262a3b1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a8", "a0", "a2", "a12"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u025049-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is not delayed. Nandor is not fragile. Nandor has a delivery window of 33.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then is stamped. #2 Each time a parcel has a delivery window less than 55, it then is not scanned. #3 Each time a parcel has a postal zone less than 71, it then has no locker slot. #4 Each time a parcel has a postal zone less than 73, it then is perishable. #5 Each time a parcel has a postal zone of 73 or above, it then is refrigerated. #6 Each time a parcel is rerouted, it then has a barcode. #7 Each time a parcel has a delivery window greater than 15, it then is prepaid. #8 Each time a parcel has a delivery window of 15 or below, it then has a waybill. #1 is set aside if a parcel is fragile. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Nandor?", "options": ["is refrigerated", "has a waybill", "is perishable", "is stamped", "is prepaid"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prepaid", "unit_id": "u025049", "pair_id": "u025049-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025049-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "edc8af974c22ff52", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a8", "a0", "a2", "a12"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u025073-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Cosima has a pain level of 17. Zora has a pain level of 57. Cosima has a pulse rate of 10. Zora has a mobility rank of 97. Cosima has a mobility rank of 53.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is postoperative provided that it has a pulse rate exceeding 77. Section 2: a patient is triaged provided that it is referred. Section 3: a patient is allergic provided that it has an interpreter. Section 4: a patient has a caregiver provided that it has a pain level lower than 69. Section 5: a patient is discharged provided that it is anemic. Section 6: a patient is anemic provided that it has a mobility rank of 52 or lower. Section 7: a patient has an interpreter provided that it is postoperative. Section 8: a patient has a pacemaker provided that it is vaccinated. Section 9: a patient has a chaperone provided that it is discharged. Section 10: a patient is vaccinated provided that it has a mobility rank exceeding 52. Section 11: a patient is bedridden provided that it has a pain level lower than 20. Section 12: a patient is contagious provided that it has a pacemaker. Section 4 lapses for a patient if it has a mobility rank lower than 40. Section 11 lapses for a patient if it has a mobility rank lower than 47. Question: Which statement fits Cosima?", "options": ["is contagious", "is allergic", "has a chaperone"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is contagious", "unit_id": "u025073", "pair_id": "u025073-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025073-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b5c02baa774ea630", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a13", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025073-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Cosima has a pain level of 17. Zora has a pain level of 57. Cosima has a pulse rate of 10. Zora has a mobility rank of 97. Cosima has a mobility rank of 9.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is postoperative provided that it has a pulse rate exceeding 77. Section 2: a patient is triaged provided that it is referred. Section 3: a patient is allergic provided that it has an interpreter. Section 4: a patient has a caregiver provided that it has a pain level lower than 69. Section 5: a patient is discharged provided that it is anemic. Section 6: a patient is anemic provided that it has a mobility rank of 52 or lower. Section 7: a patient has an interpreter provided that it is postoperative. Section 8: a patient has a pacemaker provided that it is vaccinated. Section 9: a patient has a chaperone provided that it is discharged. Section 10: a patient is vaccinated provided that it has a mobility rank exceeding 52. Section 11: a patient is bedridden provided that it has a pain level lower than 20. Section 12: a patient is contagious provided that it has a pacemaker. Section 4 lapses for a patient if it has a mobility rank lower than 40. Section 11 lapses for a patient if it has a mobility rank lower than 47. Question: Which statement fits Cosima?", "options": ["is contagious", "is allergic", "has a chaperone"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a chaperone", "unit_id": "u025073", "pair_id": "u025073-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025073-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "913bd6e11afdeb1a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a13", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025073-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Cosima has a pain level of 17. Zora has a pain level of 57. Cosima has a pulse rate of 10. Zora has a mobility rank of 97. Cosima has a mobility rank of 53.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has a pulse rate greater than 77, it then is postoperative. #2 Each time a patient is referred, it then is triaged. #3 Each time a patient has an interpreter, it then is allergic. #4 Each time a patient has a pain level less than 69, it then has a caregiver. #5 Each time a patient is anemic, it then is discharged. #6 Each time a patient has a mobility rank of 52 or below, it then is anemic. #7 Each time a patient is postoperative, it then has an interpreter. #8 Each time a patient is vaccinated, it then has a pacemaker. #9 Each time a patient is discharged, it then has a chaperone. #10 Each time a patient has a mobility rank greater than 52, it then is vaccinated. #11 Each time a patient has a pain level less than 20, it then is bedridden. #12 Each time a patient has a pacemaker, it then is contagious. #4 is set aside if a patient has a mobility rank less than 40. #11 is set aside if a patient has a mobility rank less than 47. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Cosima?", "options": ["is contagious", "is allergic", "has a chaperone"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is contagious", "unit_id": "u025073", "pair_id": "u025073-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025073-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b5c02baa774ea630", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a13", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025073-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Cosima has a pain level of 17. Zora has a pain level of 57. Cosima has a pulse rate of 10. Zora has a mobility rank of 97. Cosima has a mobility rank of 9.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has a pulse rate greater than 77, it then is postoperative. #2 Each time a patient is referred, it then is triaged. #3 Each time a patient has an interpreter, it then is allergic. #4 Each time a patient has a pain level less than 69, it then has a caregiver. #5 Each time a patient is anemic, it then is discharged. #6 Each time a patient has a mobility rank of 52 or below, it then is anemic. #7 Each time a patient is postoperative, it then has an interpreter. #8 Each time a patient is vaccinated, it then has a pacemaker. #9 Each time a patient is discharged, it then has a chaperone. #10 Each time a patient has a mobility rank greater than 52, it then is vaccinated. #11 Each time a patient has a pain level less than 20, it then is bedridden. #12 Each time a patient has a pacemaker, it then is contagious. #4 is set aside if a patient has a mobility rank less than 40. #11 is set aside if a patient has a mobility rank less than 47. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Cosima?", "options": ["is contagious", "is allergic", "has a chaperone"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a chaperone", "unit_id": "u025073", "pair_id": "u025073-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025073-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "913bd6e11afdeb1a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a13", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025088-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is not mirrored. Nimbus is not sandboxed. Halcyon is not backed up. Halcyon is virtualized. Orrery is virtualized. Borealis is not containerized. Halcyon is throttled. Borealis is provisioned. Borealis is mirrored. Nimbus is not virtualized. Borealis is backed up. Borealis is virtualized. Borealis is cached. Nimbus is not autoscaled. Borealis is throttled. Orrery is backed up. Nimbus is not isolated. Nimbus is not provisioned. Orrery is not mirrored. Borealis is isolated. Borealis has no firewall. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Orrery is isolated. Halcyon is not isolated. Halcyon is provisioned. Orrery is throttled. Orrery is sandboxed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is stateless provided that it has a public endpoint as well as is mirrored as well as is backed up. Section 2: a workload has a GPU provided that it has a firewall. Section 3: a workload is not encrypted provided that it is stateless as well as is throttled as well as is isolated. Section 4: a workload has no failover node provided that it is cached as well as is containerized. Section 5: a workload is encrypted provided that it is stateless as well as is sandboxed as well as is mirrored. Section 6: a workload has a public endpoint provided that it is virtualized as well as is provisioned. Section 4 lapses for a workload if it is mirrored. Section 6 lapses for a workload if it is backed up as well as is autoscaled. Question: Borealis is not encrypted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025088", "pair_id": "u025088-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025088-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c20421756f60b350", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025088-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is not mirrored. Nimbus is not sandboxed. Halcyon is not backed up. Halcyon is virtualized. Orrery is virtualized. Borealis is not containerized. Halcyon is throttled. Borealis is provisioned. Borealis is mirrored. Nimbus is not virtualized. Borealis is backed up. Borealis is virtualized. Borealis is cached. Nimbus is not autoscaled. Borealis is throttled. Orrery is backed up. Nimbus is not isolated. Nimbus is not provisioned. Orrery is not mirrored. Borealis is isolated. Borealis has no firewall. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Orrery is isolated. Halcyon is not isolated. Halcyon is provisioned. Orrery is throttled. Orrery is sandboxed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is stateless provided that it has a public endpoint as well as is mirrored as well as is backed up. Section 2: a workload has a GPU provided that it has a firewall. Section 3: a workload is not encrypted provided that it is stateless as well as is throttled as well as is isolated. Section 4: a workload has no failover node provided that it is cached as well as is containerized. Section 5: a workload has no snapshot provided that it is stateless as well as is mirrored. Section 6: a workload is encrypted provided that it is stateless as well as is sandboxed as well as is mirrored. Section 7: a workload has a public endpoint provided that it is virtualized as well as is provisioned. Section 4 lapses for a workload if it is mirrored. Section 7 lapses for a workload if it is backed up as well as is autoscaled. Question: Borealis is not encrypted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025088", "pair_id": "u025088-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025088-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e2474d3fb0f3ff93", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025088-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is not mirrored. Nimbus is not sandboxed. Halcyon is not backed up. Halcyon is virtualized. Orrery is virtualized. Borealis is not containerized. Halcyon is throttled. Borealis is provisioned. Borealis is mirrored. Nimbus is not virtualized. Borealis is backed up. Borealis is virtualized. Borealis is cached. Nimbus is not autoscaled. Borealis is throttled. Orrery is backed up. Nimbus is not isolated. Nimbus is not provisioned. Orrery is not mirrored. Borealis is isolated. Borealis has no firewall. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Orrery is isolated. Halcyon is not isolated. Halcyon is provisioned. Orrery is throttled. Orrery is sandboxed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload has a public endpoint and additionally is mirrored and additionally is backed up, it then is stateless. #2 Each time a workload has a firewall, it then has a GPU. #3 Each time a workload is stateless and additionally is throttled and additionally is isolated, it then is not encrypted. #4 Each time a workload is cached and additionally is containerized, it then has no failover node. #5 Each time a workload is stateless and additionally is sandboxed and additionally is mirrored, it then is encrypted. #6 Each time a workload is virtualized and additionally is provisioned, it then has a public endpoint. #4 is set aside if a workload is mirrored. #6 is set aside if a workload is backed up and additionally is autoscaled. Question: Do the terms above show that Borealis is not encrypted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025088", "pair_id": "u025088-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025088-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c20421756f60b350", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025088-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is not mirrored. Nimbus is not sandboxed. Halcyon is not backed up. Halcyon is virtualized. Orrery is virtualized. Borealis is not containerized. Halcyon is throttled. Borealis is provisioned. Borealis is mirrored. Nimbus is not virtualized. Borealis is backed up. Borealis is virtualized. Borealis is cached. Nimbus is not autoscaled. Borealis is throttled. Orrery is backed up. Nimbus is not isolated. Nimbus is not provisioned. Orrery is not mirrored. Borealis is isolated. Borealis has no firewall. Halcyon is not sandboxed. Orrery is isolated. Halcyon is not isolated. Halcyon is provisioned. Orrery is throttled. Orrery is sandboxed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload has a public endpoint and additionally is mirrored and additionally is backed up, it then is stateless. #2 Each time a workload has a firewall, it then has a GPU. #3 Each time a workload is stateless and additionally is throttled and additionally is isolated, it then is not encrypted. #4 Each time a workload is cached and additionally is containerized, it then has no failover node. #5 Each time a workload is stateless and additionally is mirrored, it then has no snapshot. #6 Each time a workload is stateless and additionally is sandboxed and additionally is mirrored, it then is encrypted. #7 Each time a workload is virtualized and additionally is provisioned, it then has a public endpoint. #4 is set aside if a workload is mirrored. #7 is set aside if a workload is backed up and additionally is autoscaled. Question: Do the terms above show that Borealis is not encrypted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025088", "pair_id": "u025088-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025088-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e2474d3fb0f3ff93", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025090-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk is not delinquent. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk is not vetted. Anouk is not underwritten. Anouk has a credit rating of 92. Anouk has a repayment grade of 83. Anouk is a depositor. Anouk has a debt ratio of 75.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is a depositor while has a credit rating beyond 59 while is vetted, thus it is pensioned. Provision 2: when the borrower here is a depositor while is underwritten, thus it is creditworthy. Provision 3: when the borrower here is a depositor while has an escrow account, thus it has a lien. Provision 4: when the borrower here is delinquent, thus it is employed. Provision 5: when the borrower here has a debt ratio beyond 36, thus it is not refinanced. Provision 6: when the borrower here is a depositor while has a repayment grade beneath 31, thus it is refinanced. Provision 7: when the borrower here is a depositor while has a credit rating at or below 59, thus it is overdrawn. Provision 8: when the borrower here is underwritten, thus it has no lien. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Which one describes Anouk?", "options": ["is overdrawn", "is creditworthy", "is pensioned", "is refinanced", "has a lien"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a lien", "unit_id": "u025090", "pair_id": "u025090-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025090-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e49b30da7399a0a0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a12", "a11", "a3", "a8"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025090-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk is delinquent. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk is not vetted. Anouk is not underwritten. Anouk has a credit rating of 92. Anouk has a repayment grade of 83. Anouk is a depositor. Anouk has a debt ratio of 75.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is a depositor while has a credit rating beyond 59 while is vetted, thus it is pensioned. Provision 2: when the borrower here is a depositor while is underwritten, thus it is creditworthy. Provision 3: when the borrower here is a depositor while has an escrow account, thus it has a lien. Provision 4: when the borrower here is delinquent, thus it is employed. Provision 5: when the borrower here has a debt ratio beyond 36, thus it is not refinanced. Provision 6: when the borrower here is a depositor while has a repayment grade beneath 31, thus it is refinanced. Provision 7: when the borrower here is a depositor while has a credit rating at or below 59, thus it is overdrawn. Provision 8: when the borrower here is underwritten, thus it has no lien. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 6. Question: Which one describes Anouk?", "options": ["is overdrawn", "is creditworthy", "is pensioned", "is refinanced", "has a lien"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a lien", "unit_id": "u025090", "pair_id": "u025090-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025090-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e0685897eafb0ed1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a12", "a11", "a3", "a8"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025097-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has a GPU. Nimbus has a memory allotment of 5.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is monitored, so it is not autoscaled. No. 2 While the given workload has a GPU, so it is mirrored. No. 3 While the given workload has a public endpoint, so it is patched. No. 4 While the given workload is mirrored, so it is autoscaled. No. 5 While the given workload has a memory allotment that exceeds 14, so it is monitored. No. 6 While the given workload has a public endpoint, so it is isolated. Question: Is the claim \"Nimbus is not autoscaled\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025097", "pair_id": "u025097-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025097-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "0b1a3885a8bf5d43", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025097-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has a GPU. Nimbus has a memory allotment of 5.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a memory allotment that falls below 52, so it is cached. No. 2 While the given workload is monitored, so it is not autoscaled. No. 3 While the given workload has a GPU, so it is mirrored. No. 4 While the given workload has a public endpoint, so it is patched. No. 5 While the given workload is mirrored, so it is autoscaled. No. 6 While the given workload has a memory allotment that exceeds 14, so it is monitored. No. 7 While the given workload has a public endpoint, so it is isolated. Question: Is the claim \"Nimbus is not autoscaled\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025097", "pair_id": "u025097-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025097-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "bb268f127e826949", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025099-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda has a premium discount. Edda is not retired. Zdenek is not retired. Edda has a payout ceiling of 38. Dmitri is retired. Zdenek has no premium discount. Zdenek has a dashcam. Agata has a dashcam. Agata has a rider. Dmitri has a premium discount. Zdenek has a payout ceiling of 25. Dmitri has a rider. Agata has a payout ceiling of 67. Agata is not retired.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has no adjuster provided that it is retired as well as has no rider. Section 2: a policyholder is reimbursed provided that it has a premium discount. Section 3: a policyholder has an adjuster provided that it is retired as well as has a rider. Section 1 lapses for a policyholder if it has no dashcam. Section 1 lapses for a policyholder if it has a payout ceiling exceeding 46. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it has a payout ceiling of 77 or higher. Question: Dmitri has an adjuster. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025099", "pair_id": "u025099-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025099-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b5ca6aa17d99b087", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025099-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda has a premium discount. Edda is not retired. Zdenek is not retired. Edda has a payout ceiling of 38. Dmitri is retired. Zdenek has no premium discount. Zdenek has a dashcam. Agata has a dashcam. Agata has a rider. Dmitri has a premium discount. Zdenek has a payout ceiling of 25. Dmitri has no rider. Agata has a payout ceiling of 67. Agata is not retired.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has no adjuster provided that it is retired as well as has no rider. Section 2: a policyholder is reimbursed provided that it has a premium discount. Section 3: a policyholder has an adjuster provided that it is retired as well as has a rider. Section 1 lapses for a policyholder if it has no dashcam. Section 1 lapses for a policyholder if it has a payout ceiling exceeding 46. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it has a payout ceiling of 77 or higher. Question: Dmitri has an adjuster. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025099", "pair_id": "u025099-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025099-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2a24784fd487d32f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025100-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek is contagious. Yusuf is anemic. Cosima is asthmatic. Cosima is contagious. Benedek is not asthmatic. Cosima is ambulatory. Cosima is referred. Yusuf is asthmatic. Yusuf is ambulatory. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Benedek is ambulatory. Cosima is postoperative.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is referred, it also is not discharged. Clause 2: once any patient is not anemic, it also is waitlisted. Clause 3: once any patient is referred, it also is not pregnant. Clause 4: once any patient is not triaged, it also is diabetic. Clause 5: once any patient is referred, it also is bedridden. Clause 6: once any patient is not rescheduled, it also is symptomatic. Clause 7: once any patient is contagious, it also is not admitted. Clause 8: once any patient is not asthmatic, it also has a pacemaker. Clause 9: once any patient is not referred, it also has a chaperone. Clause 10: once any patient is anemic, it also is pregnant. Clause 11: once any patient is rescheduled, it also is discharged. Clause 8 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not triaged. Clause 7 does not hold for a patient when any patient is triaged. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient is ambulatory. Clause 11 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not postoperative. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is postoperative. Clause 11 overrides Clause 1. Clause 3 overrides Clause 10. Question: Which of these is true of Cosima?", "options": ["is bedridden", "has a chaperone", "is diabetic", "is symptomatic", "is pregnant", "is waitlisted", "is discharged", "has a pacemaker"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bedridden", "unit_id": "u025100", "pair_id": "u025100-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025100-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "11ba3037f98f3c2b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a12", "a2", "a5", "a6", "a1", "a9", "a14"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025100-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek is contagious. Yusuf is anemic. Cosima is asthmatic. Cosima is not contagious. Benedek is not asthmatic. Cosima is ambulatory. Cosima is referred. Yusuf is asthmatic. Yusuf is ambulatory. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Benedek is ambulatory. Cosima is postoperative.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is referred, it also is not discharged. Clause 2: once any patient is not anemic, it also is waitlisted. Clause 3: once any patient is referred, it also is not pregnant. Clause 4: once any patient is not triaged, it also is diabetic. Clause 5: once any patient is referred, it also is bedridden. Clause 6: once any patient is not rescheduled, it also is symptomatic. Clause 7: once any patient is contagious, it also is not admitted. Clause 8: once any patient is not asthmatic, it also has a pacemaker. Clause 9: once any patient is not referred, it also has a chaperone. Clause 10: once any patient is anemic, it also is pregnant. Clause 11: once any patient is rescheduled, it also is discharged. Clause 8 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not triaged. Clause 7 does not hold for a patient when any patient is triaged. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient is ambulatory. Clause 11 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not postoperative. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is postoperative. Clause 11 overrides Clause 1. Clause 3 overrides Clause 10. Question: Which of these is true of Cosima?", "options": ["is bedridden", "has a chaperone", "is diabetic", "is symptomatic", "is pregnant", "is waitlisted", "is discharged", "has a pacemaker"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bedridden", "unit_id": "u025100", "pair_id": "u025100-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025100-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "55bcc94553fc8c59", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a12", "a2", "a5", "a6", "a1", "a9", "a14"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025107-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren is not audited. Wiebke is not solvent. Evren is indebted. Anouk is not vetted. Dagny is audited. Dagny is solvent. Evren is pensioned. Evren is a homeowner. Anouk is not indebted. Wiebke is not audited. Evren is vetted. Wiebke is not indebted. Evren is solvent. Dagny is not garnished. Anouk is a homeowner. Wiebke is not pensioned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is indebted and also is audited, it also has no cosigner. Clause 2: once any borrower is a homeowner and also is pensioned and also is vetted, it also is prequalified. Clause 3: once any borrower is a homeowner and also is solvent and also is pensioned, it also is a depositor. Clause 4: once any borrower is solvent, it also is employed. Clause 5: once any borrower is solvent and also is pensioned, it also has no mortgage. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is solvent. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is garnished. Question: Which of these is true of Evren?", "options": ["is a depositor", "is prequalified"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a depositor", "unit_id": "u025107", "pair_id": "u025107-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025107-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "31c07e32c534c3b3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a6"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u025107-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren is not audited. Wiebke is not solvent. Evren is indebted. Anouk is not vetted. Dagny is audited. Dagny is solvent. Evren is pensioned. Evren is a homeowner. Anouk is not indebted. Wiebke is not audited. Evren is vetted. Wiebke is not indebted. Evren is not solvent. Dagny is not garnished. Anouk is a homeowner. Wiebke is not pensioned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is indebted and also is audited, it also has no cosigner. Clause 2: once any borrower is a homeowner and also is pensioned and also is vetted, it also is prequalified. Clause 3: once any borrower is a homeowner and also is solvent and also is pensioned, it also is a depositor. Clause 4: once any borrower is solvent, it also is employed. Clause 5: once any borrower is solvent and also is pensioned, it also has no mortgage. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is solvent. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is garnished. Question: Which of these is true of Evren?", "options": ["is a depositor", "is prequalified"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prequalified", "unit_id": "u025107", "pair_id": "u025107-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025107-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6b1088ac098fc356", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a6"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u025107-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren is not audited. Wiebke is not solvent. Evren is indebted. Anouk is not vetted. Dagny is audited. Dagny is solvent. Evren is pensioned. Evren is a homeowner. Anouk is not indebted. Wiebke is not audited. Evren is vetted. Wiebke is not indebted. Evren is solvent. Dagny is not garnished. Anouk is a homeowner. Wiebke is not pensioned.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is indebted, and is audited, that borrower has no cosigner. Item B. When the borrower is a homeowner, and is pensioned, and is vetted, that borrower is prequalified. Item C. When the borrower is a homeowner, and is solvent, and is pensioned, that borrower is a depositor. Item D. When the borrower is solvent, that borrower is employed. Item E. When the borrower is solvent, and is pensioned, that borrower has no mortgage. Item B is suspended when the borrower is solvent. Item C is suspended when the borrower is garnished. Question: What applies to Evren?", "options": ["is a depositor", "is prequalified"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a depositor", "unit_id": "u025107", "pair_id": "u025107-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025107-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "31c07e32c534c3b3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a6"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u025107-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren is not audited. Wiebke is not solvent. Evren is indebted. Anouk is not vetted. Dagny is audited. Dagny is solvent. Evren is pensioned. Evren is a homeowner. Anouk is not indebted. Wiebke is not audited. Evren is vetted. Wiebke is not indebted. Evren is not solvent. Dagny is not garnished. Anouk is a homeowner. Wiebke is not pensioned.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is indebted, and is audited, that borrower has no cosigner. Item B. When the borrower is a homeowner, and is pensioned, and is vetted, that borrower is prequalified. Item C. When the borrower is a homeowner, and is solvent, and is pensioned, that borrower is a depositor. Item D. When the borrower is solvent, that borrower is employed. Item E. When the borrower is solvent, and is pensioned, that borrower has no mortgage. Item B is suspended when the borrower is solvent. Item C is suspended when the borrower is garnished. Question: What applies to Evren?", "options": ["is a depositor", "is prequalified"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prequalified", "unit_id": "u025107", "pair_id": "u025107-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025107-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6b1088ac098fc356", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a2", "a6"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u025112-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren is garnished. Evren has no mortgage. Evren has a cosigner. Evren has a credit rating of 30. Evren has a guarantor.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally has a credit rating greater than 84, it then is solvent. #2 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally has a lien, it then is audited. #3 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally is garnished, it then is underwritten. #4 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally has a debt ratio greater than 37, it then is a depositor. #5 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally has a debt ratio of 37 or below, it then is indebted. #6 Each time a borrower has a mortgage and additionally has a guarantor, it then is delinquent. #7 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally has no lien, it then is a homeowner. #8 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally is not garnished, it then has collateral. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Evren?", "options": ["is a depositor", "is indebted", "is audited", "is a homeowner", "is solvent", "is underwritten", "has collateral"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is underwritten", "unit_id": "u025112", "pair_id": "u025112-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025112-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "659ac8637f09e3a6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a14", "a4", "a10", "a1", "a5", "a6"]}, "attempt": 18}}
{"id": "syn-u025112-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren is not garnished. Evren has no mortgage. Evren has a cosigner. Evren has a credit rating of 30. Evren has a guarantor.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally has a credit rating greater than 84, it then is solvent. #2 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally has a lien, it then is audited. #3 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally is garnished, it then is underwritten. #4 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally has a debt ratio greater than 37, it then is a depositor. #5 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally has a debt ratio of 37 or below, it then is indebted. #6 Each time a borrower has a mortgage and additionally has a guarantor, it then is delinquent. #7 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally has no lien, it then is a homeowner. #8 Each time a borrower has a cosigner and additionally is not garnished, it then has collateral. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Evren?", "options": ["is a depositor", "is indebted", "is audited", "is a homeowner", "is solvent", "is underwritten", "has collateral"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u025112", "pair_id": "u025112-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025112-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e326abcb013a82e4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a14", "a4", "a10", "a1", "a5", "a6"]}, "attempt": 18}}
{"id": "syn-u025132-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is not compiled. Talc is experimental. Talc is signed. Talc is not linted. Talc is not tagged. Talc is flaky. Talc has a security advisory.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is tagged plus is signed: then it has a feature toggle. Policy II. Suppose that build is backported plus is experimental plus is signed: then it is profiled. Policy III. Suppose that build is benchmarked plus has a security advisory: then it is minified. Policy IV. Suppose that build is backported plus is compiled: then it is not profiled. Policy V. Suppose that build has a security advisory: then it is backported. Policy II is waived if that build is linted plus is flaky. Question: Is it so that Talc is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025132", "pair_id": "u025132-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025132-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "03ad422f0b7efc25", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025132-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is not compiled. Talc is experimental. Talc is signed. Talc is not linted. Talc is not tagged. Talc is flaky. Talc has a security advisory.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is tagged plus is signed: then it has a feature toggle. Policy II. Suppose that build is backported plus is experimental plus is signed: then it is profiled. Policy III. Suppose that build is benchmarked plus has a security advisory: then it is minified. Policy IV. Suppose that build is backported plus is compiled: then it is not profiled. Policy V. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is not reverted. Policy VI. Suppose that build has a security advisory: then it is backported. Policy II is waived if that build is linted plus is flaky. Question: Is it so that Talc is profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025132", "pair_id": "u025132-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025132-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2463162f98a484cc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025139-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk is a depositor. Anouk has collateral. Anouk is a homeowner. Anouk is amortized.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is a depositor, it also is garnished. Clause 2: once any borrower has a cosigner and also is audited and also is a depositor, it also is not foreclosed. Clause 3: once any borrower has collateral, it also is refinanced. Clause 4: once any borrower is a depositor, it also has no cosigner. Clause 5: once any borrower is a depositor and also is a homeowner and also is audited, it also is pensioned. Clause 6: once any borrower has a cosigner and also is a depositor, it also is foreclosed. Clause 7: once any borrower has collateral and also is a depositor and also is amortized, it also is bankrupt. Clause 8: once any borrower is garnished, it also has a cosigner. Clause 6 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is overdrawn and also is a depositor. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 8 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Anouk is foreclosed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025139", "pair_id": "u025139-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025139-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0736766165e8134f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025139-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk is a depositor. Anouk has collateral. Anouk is a homeowner. Anouk is amortized. Anouk is audited.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is a depositor, it also is garnished. Clause 2: once any borrower has a cosigner and also is audited and also is a depositor, it also is not foreclosed. Clause 3: once any borrower has collateral, it also is refinanced. Clause 4: once any borrower is a depositor, it also has no cosigner. Clause 5: once any borrower is a depositor and also is a homeowner and also is audited, it also is pensioned. Clause 6: once any borrower has a cosigner and also is a depositor, it also is foreclosed. Clause 7: once any borrower has collateral and also is a depositor and also is amortized, it also is bankrupt. Clause 8: once any borrower is garnished, it also has a cosigner. Clause 6 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is overdrawn and also is a depositor. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 8 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Anouk is foreclosed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025139", "pair_id": "u025139-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025139-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "62824fd42210a497", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025183-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Priya is delayed. Rasmus is not prepaid. Rasmus is delayed. Priya is prepaid. Priya is undeliverable.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is prepaid, it then is weighed. #2 Each time a parcel is consolidated, it then is rerouted. #3 Each time a parcel is tracked, it then is registered. #4 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then has a waybill. #5 Each time a parcel is labeled, it then is misrouted. #6 Each time a parcel has a waybill, it then is refrigerated. #7 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is not stamped. #8 Each time a parcel is weighed, it then is tracked. #9 Each time a parcel is undeliverable, it then has a barcode. #10 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is consolidated. #11 Each time a parcel is refrigerated, it then is stamped. #12 Each time a parcel is undeliverable, it then has no barcode. #12 yields to #9. #11 yields to #7. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Rasmus?", "options": ["is rerouted", "is stamped", "is registered"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is stamped", "unit_id": "u025183", "pair_id": "u025183-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025183-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "e7d8ee8d2ab8c7e8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a11", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025183-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Rasmus is undeliverable. Priya is delayed. Rasmus is not prepaid. Rasmus is delayed. Priya is prepaid. Priya is undeliverable.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is prepaid, it then is weighed. #2 Each time a parcel is consolidated, it then is rerouted. #3 Each time a parcel is tracked, it then is registered. #4 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then has a waybill. #5 Each time a parcel is labeled, it then is misrouted. #6 Each time a parcel has a waybill, it then is refrigerated. #7 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is not stamped. #8 Each time a parcel is weighed, it then is tracked. #9 Each time a parcel is undeliverable, it then has a barcode. #10 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is consolidated. #11 Each time a parcel is refrigerated, it then is stamped. #12 Each time a parcel is undeliverable, it then has no barcode. #12 yields to #9. #11 yields to #7. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Rasmus?", "options": ["is rerouted", "is stamped", "is registered"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is rerouted", "unit_id": "u025183", "pair_id": "u025183-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025183-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "fcae59f4a634d7c1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a11", "a4"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025189-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian has a lint backlog of 49. Obsidian is merged. Galena has a lint backlog of 22. Pumice is minified. Basalt has a lint backlog of 58. Galena has a migration script. Pumice has no migration script. Pumice is merged. Pumice is benchmarked.", "instruction": "(1) If a build has a lint backlog below 60, then it is not notarized. (2) If a build is tagged, then it has a security advisory. (3) If a build is notarized, then it has no security advisory. (4) If a build has a migration script, then it is documented. (5) If a build is benchmarked, then it is not documented. (6) If a build is localized, then it is tagged. (7) If a build is merged, then it is not reverted. (8) If a build is benchmarked, then it is notarized. When (2) and (3) clash, (2) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (1) and (8) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Pumice has a security advisory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025189", "pair_id": "u025189-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025189-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "95809d0238101217", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025189-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian has a lint backlog of 49. Obsidian is merged. Galena has a lint backlog of 22. Pumice is minified. Basalt has a lint backlog of 58. Galena has a migration script. Pumice has no migration script. Pumice is not merged. Pumice is benchmarked.", "instruction": "(1) If a build has a lint backlog below 60, then it is not notarized. (2) If a build is tagged, then it has a security advisory. (3) If a build is notarized, then it has no security advisory. (4) If a build has a migration script, then it is documented. (5) If a build is benchmarked, then it is not documented. (6) If a build is localized, then it is tagged. (7) If a build is merged, then it is not reverted. (8) If a build is benchmarked, then it is notarized. When (2) and (3) clash, (2) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (1) and (8) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Pumice has a security advisory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025189", "pair_id": "u025189-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025189-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a1fe914691a9e4c7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025189-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian has a lint backlog of 49. Obsidian is merged. Galena has a lint backlog of 22. Pumice is minified. Basalt has a lint backlog of 58. Galena has a migration script. Pumice has no migration script. Pumice is merged. Pumice is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a lint backlog of less than 60, that build is not notarized. Item B. When the build is tagged, that build has a security advisory. Item C. When the build is notarized, that build has no security advisory. Item D. When the build has a migration script, that build is documented. Item E. When the build is benchmarked, that build is not documented. Item F. When the build is localized, that build is tagged. Item G. When the build is merged, that build is not reverted. Item H. When the build is benchmarked, that build is notarized. Item B outranks Item C. Item D outranks Item E. Item A outranks Item H. Question: Can one infer that Pumice has a security advisory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025189", "pair_id": "u025189-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025189-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "95809d0238101217", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025189-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian has a lint backlog of 49. Obsidian is merged. Galena has a lint backlog of 22. Pumice is minified. Basalt has a lint backlog of 58. Galena has a migration script. Pumice has no migration script. Pumice is not merged. Pumice is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a lint backlog of less than 60, that build is not notarized. Item B. When the build is tagged, that build has a security advisory. Item C. When the build is notarized, that build has no security advisory. Item D. When the build has a migration script, that build is documented. Item E. When the build is benchmarked, that build is not documented. Item F. When the build is localized, that build is tagged. Item G. When the build is merged, that build is not reverted. Item H. When the build is benchmarked, that build is notarized. Item B outranks Item C. Item D outranks Item E. Item A outranks Item H. Question: Can one infer that Pumice has a security advisory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025189", "pair_id": "u025189-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025189-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a1fe914691a9e4c7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025224-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is tested. Shale is not tagged. Zircon is reverted. Shale is not compiled. Shale is notarized. Shale has a security advisory. Zircon has no security advisory. Shale is documented. Zircon is tested.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is minified provided that it is tested as well as has a security advisory as well as is tagged. Section 2: a build is not minified provided that it is tested as well as is reverted. Section 3: a build has a feature toggle provided that it is compiled as well as has a security advisory. Section 4: a build is not signed provided that it is notarized as well as is documented as well as is reverted. Question: Shale is minified. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025224", "pair_id": "u025224-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025224-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "4569a01ae1499e0d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u025224-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is tested. Shale is not tagged. Zircon is reverted. Shale is compiled. Shale is notarized. Shale has a security advisory. Zircon has no security advisory. Shale is documented. Zircon is tested.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is minified provided that it is tested as well as has a security advisory as well as is tagged. Section 2: a build is not minified provided that it is tested as well as is reverted. Section 3: a build has a feature toggle provided that it is compiled as well as has a security advisory. Section 4: a build is not signed provided that it is notarized as well as is documented as well as is reverted. Question: Shale is minified. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025224", "pair_id": "u025224-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025224-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "02a32ad1001463db", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u025362-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar has no changelog. Pumice is notarized. Feldspar is backported. Feldspar is documented. Feldspar is fuzzed. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is localized. Feldspar is not reproducible. Feldspar is not linted. Feldspar is not versioned. Feldspar is merged. Pumice has a changelog. Pumice is not backported. Feldspar is experimental.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is flaky provided that it has a changelog. Section 2: a build is profiled provided that it is benchmarked as well as is merged as well as is localized. Section 3: a build is tested provided that it is benchmarked as well as is versioned. Section 4: a build has a migration script provided that it is experimental. Section 5: a build is signed provided that it is benchmarked as well as is notarized as well as is reproducible. Section 6: a build is tagged provided that it is benchmarked as well as is linted. Section 7: a build is reverted provided that it is benchmarked as well as is compiled. Section 8: a build is minified provided that it is benchmarked as well as is fuzzed. Section 9: a build is benchmarked provided that it has a migration script as well as is documented. Section 3 lapses for a build if it is compiled. Section 7 lapses for a build if it is linted. Section 8 lapses for a build if it is merged. Section 5 lapses for a build if it is backported. Section 3 lapses for a build if it is notarized. Question: Which statement fits Feldspar?", "options": ["is signed", "is tagged", "is profiled", "is reverted", "is minified", "is tested"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is profiled", "unit_id": "u025362", "pair_id": "u025362-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025362-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9928966d8c4d47b1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a16", "a18", "a0", "a12", "a5"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u025362-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar has no changelog. Pumice is notarized. Feldspar is backported. Feldspar is documented. Feldspar is fuzzed. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is localized. Feldspar is not reproducible. Feldspar is not linted. Feldspar is not versioned. Feldspar is not merged. Pumice has a changelog. Pumice is not backported. Feldspar is experimental.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is flaky provided that it has a changelog. Section 2: a build is profiled provided that it is benchmarked as well as is merged as well as is localized. Section 3: a build is tested provided that it is benchmarked as well as is versioned. Section 4: a build has a migration script provided that it is experimental. Section 5: a build is signed provided that it is benchmarked as well as is notarized as well as is reproducible. Section 6: a build is tagged provided that it is benchmarked as well as is linted. Section 7: a build is reverted provided that it is benchmarked as well as is compiled. Section 8: a build is minified provided that it is benchmarked as well as is fuzzed. Section 9: a build is benchmarked provided that it has a migration script as well as is documented. Section 3 lapses for a build if it is compiled. Section 7 lapses for a build if it is linted. Section 8 lapses for a build if it is merged. Section 5 lapses for a build if it is backported. Section 3 lapses for a build if it is notarized. Question: Which statement fits Feldspar?", "options": ["is signed", "is tagged", "is profiled", "is reverted", "is minified", "is tested"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u025362", "pair_id": "u025362-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025362-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bd82298856bb2a12", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a16", "a18", "a0", "a12", "a5"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u025362-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar has no changelog. Pumice is notarized. Feldspar is backported. Feldspar is documented. Feldspar is fuzzed. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is localized. Feldspar is not reproducible. Feldspar is not linted. Feldspar is not versioned. Feldspar is merged. Pumice has a changelog. Pumice is not backported. Feldspar is experimental.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a changelog, it then is flaky. #2 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally is merged and additionally is localized, it then is profiled. #3 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally is versioned, it then is tested. #4 Each time a build is experimental, it then has a migration script. #5 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally is notarized and additionally is reproducible, it then is signed. #6 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally is linted, it then is tagged. #7 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally is compiled, it then is reverted. #8 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally is fuzzed, it then is minified. #9 Each time a build has a migration script and additionally is documented, it then is benchmarked. #3 is set aside if a build is compiled. #7 is set aside if a build is linted. #8 is set aside if a build is merged. #5 is set aside if a build is backported. #3 is set aside if a build is notarized. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Feldspar?", "options": ["is signed", "is tagged", "is profiled", "is reverted", "is minified", "is tested"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is profiled", "unit_id": "u025362", "pair_id": "u025362-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025362-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9928966d8c4d47b1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a16", "a18", "a0", "a12", "a5"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u025362-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar has no changelog. Pumice is notarized. Feldspar is backported. Feldspar is documented. Feldspar is fuzzed. Feldspar is notarized. Feldspar is localized. Feldspar is not reproducible. Feldspar is not linted. Feldspar is not versioned. Feldspar is not merged. Pumice has a changelog. Pumice is not backported. Feldspar is experimental.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a changelog, it then is flaky. #2 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally is merged and additionally is localized, it then is profiled. #3 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally is versioned, it then is tested. #4 Each time a build is experimental, it then has a migration script. #5 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally is notarized and additionally is reproducible, it then is signed. #6 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally is linted, it then is tagged. #7 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally is compiled, it then is reverted. #8 Each time a build is benchmarked and additionally is fuzzed, it then is minified. #9 Each time a build has a migration script and additionally is documented, it then is benchmarked. #3 is set aside if a build is compiled. #7 is set aside if a build is linted. #8 is set aside if a build is merged. #5 is set aside if a build is backported. #3 is set aside if a build is notarized. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Feldspar?", "options": ["is signed", "is tagged", "is profiled", "is reverted", "is minified", "is tested"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u025362", "pair_id": "u025362-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025362-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bd82298856bb2a12", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a16", "a18", "a0", "a12", "a5"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u025370-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is recommended. Kalle is not unionized. Sigrid is unionized. Sigrid has a visa. Kalle has a visa.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not relocating provided that it has a visa. Section 2: a candidate is not interviewed provided that it is not unionized. Section 3: a candidate is relocating provided that it is recommended. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Kalle is relocating. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025370", "pair_id": "u025370-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025370-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "44d907a4b09cfea0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025370-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is recommended. Kalle is not unionized. Sigrid is unionized. Sigrid has a visa. Kalle has a visa.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not relocating provided that it has a visa. Section 2: a candidate is not interviewed provided that it is unionized. Section 3: a candidate is relocating provided that it is recommended. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Kalle is relocating. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025370", "pair_id": "u025370-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025370-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "be72c87487dd54e9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025377-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fomalhaut is translational. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 76. Fomalhaut is longitudinal. Mirach is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is longitudinal, thus it is preregistered. Provision 2: when the proposal here is cofunded, thus it is exploratory. Provision 3: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is not renewed. Provision 4: when the proposal here has a citation index beyond 11, thus it is multicenter. Provision 5: when the proposal here is not longitudinal, thus it is not multicenter. Provision 6: when the proposal here is not renewed, thus it has a patent filing. Provision 7: when the proposal here has a patent filing, thus it has a steering committee. Provision 8: when the proposal here is multicenter, thus it is cofunded. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here is embargoed. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Fomalhaut?", "options": ["has a steering committee", "is exploratory"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is exploratory", "unit_id": "u025377", "pair_id": "u025377-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025377-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "01eeabdf2bd5c412", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a1"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u025377-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fomalhaut is translational. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 76. Fomalhaut is embargoed. Fomalhaut is longitudinal. Mirach is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is longitudinal, thus it is preregistered. Provision 2: when the proposal here is cofunded, thus it is exploratory. Provision 3: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is not renewed. Provision 4: when the proposal here has a citation index beyond 11, thus it is multicenter. Provision 5: when the proposal here is not longitudinal, thus it is not multicenter. Provision 6: when the proposal here is not renewed, thus it has a patent filing. Provision 7: when the proposal here has a patent filing, thus it has a steering committee. Provision 8: when the proposal here is multicenter, thus it is cofunded. Provision 2 has no effect when the proposal here is embargoed. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Fomalhaut?", "options": ["has a steering committee", "is exploratory"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a steering committee", "unit_id": "u025377", "pair_id": "u025377-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025377-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fe0a25a626da2bc0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a1"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u025381-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has a milestone total of 11. Mirach is not renewed. Betelgeuse is renewed. Betelgeuse has ethics clearance. Betelgeuse has a milestone total of 19. Kochab has a milestone total of 86. Mirach has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is interdisciplinary, then it has seed funding. (2) If a proposal is theoretical, then it has a patent filing. (3) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is theoretical. (4) If a proposal is renewed, then it is embargoed. (5) If a proposal has ethics clearance, then it is collaborative. (6) If a proposal has a milestone total below 25, then it is interdisciplinary. (7) If a proposal is renewed, then it is multicenter. (8) If a proposal has a milestone total of at least 25, then it is cofunded. (9) If a proposal has seed funding, then it is longitudinal. (5) is void if the proposal has a milestone total above 58. (4) is void if the proposal has a milestone total below 20. Question: Which option holds for Betelgeuse?", "options": ["has a patent filing", "is longitudinal"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is longitudinal", "unit_id": "u025381", "pair_id": "u025381-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025381-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8a05bdf5ebce3346", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025381-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has a milestone total of 11. Mirach is not renewed. Betelgeuse is renewed. Betelgeuse has ethics clearance. Betelgeuse has a milestone total of 26. Kochab has a milestone total of 86. Mirach has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is interdisciplinary, then it has seed funding. (2) If a proposal is theoretical, then it has a patent filing. (3) If a proposal is cofunded, then it is theoretical. (4) If a proposal is renewed, then it is embargoed. (5) If a proposal has ethics clearance, then it is collaborative. (6) If a proposal has a milestone total below 25, then it is interdisciplinary. (7) If a proposal is renewed, then it is multicenter. (8) If a proposal has a milestone total of at least 25, then it is cofunded. (9) If a proposal has seed funding, then it is longitudinal. (5) is void if the proposal has a milestone total above 58. (4) is void if the proposal has a milestone total below 20. Question: Which option holds for Betelgeuse?", "options": ["has a patent filing", "is longitudinal"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a patent filing", "unit_id": "u025381", "pair_id": "u025381-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025381-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0fbcceca67ad2a15", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025381-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has a milestone total of 11. Mirach is not renewed. Betelgeuse is renewed. Betelgeuse has ethics clearance. Betelgeuse has a milestone total of 19. Kochab has a milestone total of 86. Mirach has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is interdisciplinary, that proposal has seed funding. Item B. When the proposal is theoretical, that proposal has a patent filing. Item C. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is theoretical. Item D. When the proposal is renewed, that proposal is embargoed. Item E. When the proposal has ethics clearance, that proposal is collaborative. Item F. When the proposal has a milestone total of less than 25, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item G. When the proposal is renewed, that proposal is multicenter. Item H. When the proposal has a milestone total of no less than 25, that proposal is cofunded. Item I. When the proposal has seed funding, that proposal is longitudinal. Item E is suspended when the proposal has a milestone total of more than 58. Item D is suspended when the proposal has a milestone total of less than 20. Question: What applies to Betelgeuse?", "options": ["has a patent filing", "is longitudinal"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is longitudinal", "unit_id": "u025381", "pair_id": "u025381-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025381-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8a05bdf5ebce3346", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025381-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has a milestone total of 11. Mirach is not renewed. Betelgeuse is renewed. Betelgeuse has ethics clearance. Betelgeuse has a milestone total of 26. Kochab has a milestone total of 86. Mirach has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is interdisciplinary, that proposal has seed funding. Item B. When the proposal is theoretical, that proposal has a patent filing. Item C. When the proposal is cofunded, that proposal is theoretical. Item D. When the proposal is renewed, that proposal is embargoed. Item E. When the proposal has ethics clearance, that proposal is collaborative. Item F. When the proposal has a milestone total of less than 25, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item G. When the proposal is renewed, that proposal is multicenter. Item H. When the proposal has a milestone total of no less than 25, that proposal is cofunded. Item I. When the proposal has seed funding, that proposal is longitudinal. Item E is suspended when the proposal has a milestone total of more than 58. Item D is suspended when the proposal has a milestone total of less than 20. Question: What applies to Betelgeuse?", "options": ["has a patent filing", "is longitudinal"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a patent filing", "unit_id": "u025381", "pair_id": "u025381-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025381-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0fbcceca67ad2a15", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025399-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is weighed. Saskia is consolidated. Saskia is fragile.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is consolidated, then it has no courier. (2) If a parcel is weighed, then it has a courier. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Quentin is fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025399", "pair_id": "u025399-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025399-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "0d33f68a7deed909", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025399-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is not weighed. Saskia is consolidated. Saskia is fragile.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is consolidated, then it has no courier. (2) If a parcel is weighed, then it has a courier. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Quentin is fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025399", "pair_id": "u025399-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025399-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "093cf9d810c2e6cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025441-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is backported. Zircon is tested. Quartz is not reverted. Obsidian is versioned. Obsidian is not tested. Obsidian is fuzzed. Obsidian is not documented. Obsidian has a changelog. Zircon is not fuzzed. Obsidian is not profiled.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is reproducible and is documented and is not backported, then it is obsolete. (2) If a build is reverted, then it is not benchmarked. (3) If a build is not fuzzed and is profiled, then it has a feature toggle. (4) If a build is reproducible and has no changelog, then it is flaky. (5) If a build is reproducible and is not versioned, then it is benchmarked. (6) If a build is not tested, then it is reproducible. (7) If a build is reproducible and is backported, then it is minified. (8) If a build is documented, then it is not flaky. (9) If a build is reproducible and is not linted, then it is tagged. (10) If a build is backported, then it is not tagged. (11) If a build is reproducible and is not reverted, then it has a migration script. (11) is void if the build is not versioned. When (8) and (4) clash, (8) prevails. When (10) and (9) clash, (10) prevails. When (2) and (5) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Obsidian?", "options": ["is benchmarked", "is obsolete", "is minified", "is flaky", "is tagged", "has a migration script"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u025441", "pair_id": "u025441-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025441-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d0f59a9d72dfaebe", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a14", "a16", "a7", "a15", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025441-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is backported. Zircon is tested. Quartz is not reverted. Obsidian is versioned. Obsidian is not tested. Obsidian is fuzzed. Obsidian is documented. Obsidian has a changelog. Zircon is not fuzzed. Obsidian is not profiled.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is reproducible and is documented and is not backported, then it is obsolete. (2) If a build is reverted, then it is not benchmarked. (3) If a build is not fuzzed and is profiled, then it has a feature toggle. (4) If a build is reproducible and has no changelog, then it is flaky. (5) If a build is reproducible and is not versioned, then it is benchmarked. (6) If a build is not tested, then it is reproducible. (7) If a build is reproducible and is backported, then it is minified. (8) If a build is documented, then it is not flaky. (9) If a build is reproducible and is not linted, then it is tagged. (10) If a build is backported, then it is not tagged. (11) If a build is reproducible and is not reverted, then it has a migration script. (11) is void if the build is not versioned. When (8) and (4) clash, (8) prevails. When (10) and (9) clash, (10) prevails. When (2) and (5) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Obsidian?", "options": ["is benchmarked", "is obsolete", "is minified", "is flaky", "is tagged", "has a migration script"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u025441", "pair_id": "u025441-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025441-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "90eff97530e8d1db", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a14", "a16", "a7", "a15", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025441-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is backported. Zircon is tested. Quartz is not reverted. Obsidian is versioned. Obsidian is not tested. Obsidian is fuzzed. Obsidian is not documented. Obsidian has a changelog. Zircon is not fuzzed. Obsidian is not profiled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is reproducible and also is documented and also is not backported, it also is obsolete. Clause 2: once any build is reverted, it also is not benchmarked. Clause 3: once any build is not fuzzed and also is profiled, it also has a feature toggle. Clause 4: once any build is reproducible and also has no changelog, it also is flaky. Clause 5: once any build is reproducible and also is not versioned, it also is benchmarked. Clause 6: once any build is not tested, it also is reproducible. Clause 7: once any build is reproducible and also is backported, it also is minified. Clause 8: once any build is documented, it also is not flaky. Clause 9: once any build is reproducible and also is not linted, it also is tagged. Clause 10: once any build is backported, it also is not tagged. Clause 11: once any build is reproducible and also is not reverted, it also has a migration script. Clause 11 does not hold for a build when any build is not versioned. Clause 8 overrides Clause 4. Clause 10 overrides Clause 9. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Question: Which of these is true of Obsidian?", "options": ["is benchmarked", "is obsolete", "is minified", "is flaky", "is tagged", "has a migration script"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u025441", "pair_id": "u025441-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025441-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d0f59a9d72dfaebe", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a14", "a16", "a7", "a15", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025441-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is backported. Zircon is tested. Quartz is not reverted. Obsidian is versioned. Obsidian is not tested. Obsidian is fuzzed. Obsidian is documented. Obsidian has a changelog. Zircon is not fuzzed. Obsidian is not profiled.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is reproducible and also is documented and also is not backported, it also is obsolete. Clause 2: once any build is reverted, it also is not benchmarked. Clause 3: once any build is not fuzzed and also is profiled, it also has a feature toggle. Clause 4: once any build is reproducible and also has no changelog, it also is flaky. Clause 5: once any build is reproducible and also is not versioned, it also is benchmarked. Clause 6: once any build is not tested, it also is reproducible. Clause 7: once any build is reproducible and also is backported, it also is minified. Clause 8: once any build is documented, it also is not flaky. Clause 9: once any build is reproducible and also is not linted, it also is tagged. Clause 10: once any build is backported, it also is not tagged. Clause 11: once any build is reproducible and also is not reverted, it also has a migration script. Clause 11 does not hold for a build when any build is not versioned. Clause 8 overrides Clause 4. Clause 10 overrides Clause 9. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Question: Which of these is true of Obsidian?", "options": ["is benchmarked", "is obsolete", "is minified", "is flaky", "is tagged", "has a migration script"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u025441", "pair_id": "u025441-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025441-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "90eff97530e8d1db", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a14", "a16", "a7", "a15", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025441-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is backported. Zircon is tested. Quartz is not reverted. Obsidian is versioned. Obsidian is not tested. Obsidian is fuzzed. Obsidian is not documented. Obsidian has a changelog. Zircon is not fuzzed. Obsidian is not profiled.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is reproducible, and is documented, and is not backported, that build is obsolete. Item B. When the build is reverted, that build is not benchmarked. Item C. When the build is not fuzzed, and is profiled, that build has a feature toggle. Item D. When the build is reproducible, and has no changelog, that build is flaky. Item E. When the build is reproducible, and is not versioned, that build is benchmarked. Item F. When the build is not tested, that build is reproducible. Item G. When the build is reproducible, and is backported, that build is minified. Item H. When the build is documented, that build is not flaky. Item I. When the build is reproducible, and is not linted, that build is tagged. Item J. When the build is backported, that build is not tagged. Item K. When the build is reproducible, and is not reverted, that build has a migration script. Item K is suspended when the build is not versioned. Item H outranks Item D. Item J outranks Item I. Item B outranks Item E. Question: What applies to Obsidian?", "options": ["is benchmarked", "is obsolete", "is minified", "is flaky", "is tagged", "has a migration script"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u025441", "pair_id": "u025441-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025441-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d0f59a9d72dfaebe", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a14", "a16", "a7", "a15", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025441-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is backported. Zircon is tested. Quartz is not reverted. Obsidian is versioned. Obsidian is not tested. Obsidian is fuzzed. Obsidian is documented. Obsidian has a changelog. Zircon is not fuzzed. Obsidian is not profiled.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is reproducible, and is documented, and is not backported, that build is obsolete. Item B. When the build is reverted, that build is not benchmarked. Item C. When the build is not fuzzed, and is profiled, that build has a feature toggle. Item D. When the build is reproducible, and has no changelog, that build is flaky. Item E. When the build is reproducible, and is not versioned, that build is benchmarked. Item F. When the build is not tested, that build is reproducible. Item G. When the build is reproducible, and is backported, that build is minified. Item H. When the build is documented, that build is not flaky. Item I. When the build is reproducible, and is not linted, that build is tagged. Item J. When the build is backported, that build is not tagged. Item K. When the build is reproducible, and is not reverted, that build has a migration script. Item K is suspended when the build is not versioned. Item H outranks Item D. Item J outranks Item I. Item B outranks Item E. Question: What applies to Obsidian?", "options": ["is benchmarked", "is obsolete", "is minified", "is flaky", "is tagged", "has a migration script"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u025441", "pair_id": "u025441-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025441-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "90eff97530e8d1db", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a14", "a16", "a7", "a15", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025442-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has no background screening. Olek is sponsored. Teodor is not sponsored. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 23. Mads is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is a graduate provided that it is sponsored. Section 2: a candidate is licensed provided that it has an aptitude quotient of 55 or lower. Section 3: a candidate is bonded provided that it is not sponsored. Question: Mads has no background screening. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025442", "pair_id": "u025442-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025442-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e4ea6ab847ba3784", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u025442-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has no background screening. Olek is sponsored. Teodor is not sponsored. Mads has no background screening. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 23. Mads is not sponsored.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is a graduate provided that it is sponsored. Section 2: a candidate is licensed provided that it has an aptitude quotient of 55 or lower. Section 3: a candidate is bonded provided that it is not sponsored. Question: Mads has no background screening. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025442", "pair_id": "u025442-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025442-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d5b8d74b1e2266ca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u025442-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has no background screening. Olek is sponsored. Teodor is not sponsored. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 23. Mads is not sponsored.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is sponsored, it then is a graduate. #2 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient of 55 or below, it then is licensed. #3 Each time a candidate is not sponsored, it then is bonded. Question: Do the terms above show that Mads has no background screening?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025442", "pair_id": "u025442-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025442-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e4ea6ab847ba3784", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u025442-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has no background screening. Olek is sponsored. Teodor is not sponsored. Mads has no background screening. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 23. Mads is not sponsored.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is sponsored, it then is a graduate. #2 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient of 55 or below, it then is licensed. #3 Each time a candidate is not sponsored, it then is bonded. Question: Do the terms above show that Mads has no background screening?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025442", "pair_id": "u025442-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025442-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d5b8d74b1e2266ca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u025462-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb has no patent filing. Deneb has a milestone total of 46. Deneb is resubmitted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is multicenter provided that it is resubmitted. Section 2: a proposal is a pilot study provided that it is multicenter as well as has a milestone total of 47 or lower as well as is resubmitted. Section 3: a proposal is not a pilot study provided that it is multicenter as well as has a milestone total exceeding 47 as well as is resubmitted. Section 4: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it is renewed. Section 3 lapses for a proposal if it is resubmitted as well as has a patent filing. Question: Deneb is not a pilot study. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025462", "pair_id": "u025462-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025462-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3e9832f9cf5c0fe6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025462-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb has no patent filing. Deneb has a milestone total of 57. Deneb is resubmitted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is multicenter provided that it is resubmitted. Section 2: a proposal is a pilot study provided that it is multicenter as well as has a milestone total of 47 or lower as well as is resubmitted. Section 3: a proposal is not a pilot study provided that it is multicenter as well as has a milestone total exceeding 47 as well as is resubmitted. Section 4: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it is renewed. Section 3 lapses for a proposal if it is resubmitted as well as has a patent filing. Question: Deneb is not a pilot study. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025462", "pair_id": "u025462-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025462-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "dd2d12833e53552e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025483-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a notice period of 17. Jasna has a portfolio. Jasna has a visa. Olek is not onboarded. Olek has no visa. Olek has no portfolio. Sigrid is onboarded. Sigrid has a notice period of 53. Olek has a commute radius of 53.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is onboarded, it thereby is eligible. Point B. If said candidate is a veteran, it thereby is bilingual. Point C. If said candidate is onboarded, it thereby is not bilingual. Point D. If said candidate is not relocating, it thereby is not a graduate. Point E. If said candidate has a notice period short of 66, it thereby is relocating. Point F. If said candidate has a commute radius short of 82, it thereby is not relocating. Point G. If said candidate has a portfolio, it thereby is a graduate. Point H. If said candidate has a notice period short of 28, it thereby is a veteran. Point I. If said candidate is not a graduate, it thereby is not fingerprinted. Point J. If said candidate is bilingual, it thereby is fingerprinted. Point G supersedes Point D. Point C supersedes Point B. Point E supersedes Point F. Point J supersedes Point I. Question: Statement: Olek is fingerprinted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025483", "pair_id": "u025483-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025483-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8262f5b93f237360", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025483-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a notice period of 17. Jasna has a portfolio. Jasna has a visa. Olek is not onboarded. Olek has no visa. Olek has no portfolio. Sigrid is onboarded. Sigrid has a notice period of 53. Olek has a commute radius of 53.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is onboarded, it thereby is eligible. Point B. If said candidate is a veteran, it thereby is bilingual. Point C. If said candidate has no visa, it thereby is not unionized. Point D. If said candidate is onboarded, it thereby is not bilingual. Point E. If said candidate is not relocating, it thereby is not a graduate. Point F. If said candidate has a notice period short of 66, it thereby is relocating. Point G. If said candidate has a commute radius short of 82, it thereby is not relocating. Point H. If said candidate has a portfolio, it thereby is a graduate. Point I. If said candidate has a notice period short of 28, it thereby is a veteran. Point J. If said candidate is not a graduate, it thereby is not fingerprinted. Point K. If said candidate is bilingual, it thereby is fingerprinted. Point H supersedes Point E. Point D supersedes Point B. Point F supersedes Point G. Point K supersedes Point J. Question: Statement: Olek is fingerprinted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025483", "pair_id": "u025483-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025483-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cb62f75b2fe2f121", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025483-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a notice period of 17. Jasna has a portfolio. Jasna has a visa. Olek is not onboarded. Olek has no visa. Olek has no portfolio. Sigrid is onboarded. Sigrid has a notice period of 53. Olek has a commute radius of 53.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is onboarded, so it is eligible. No. 2 While the given candidate is a veteran, so it is bilingual. No. 3 While the given candidate is onboarded, so it is not bilingual. No. 4 While the given candidate is not relocating, so it is not a graduate. No. 5 While the given candidate has a notice period that falls below 66, so it is relocating. No. 6 While the given candidate has a commute radius that falls below 82, so it is not relocating. No. 7 While the given candidate has a portfolio, so it is a graduate. No. 8 While the given candidate has a notice period that falls below 28, so it is a veteran. No. 9 While the given candidate is not a graduate, so it is not fingerprinted. No. 10 While the given candidate is bilingual, so it is fingerprinted. No. 7 wins over No. 4. No. 3 wins over No. 2. No. 5 wins over No. 6. No. 10 wins over No. 9. Question: Is the claim \"Olek is fingerprinted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025483", "pair_id": "u025483-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025483-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8262f5b93f237360", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025483-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a notice period of 17. Jasna has a portfolio. Jasna has a visa. Olek is not onboarded. Olek has no visa. Olek has no portfolio. Sigrid is onboarded. Sigrid has a notice period of 53. Olek has a commute radius of 53.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is onboarded, so it is eligible. No. 2 While the given candidate is a veteran, so it is bilingual. No. 3 While the given candidate has no visa, so it is not unionized. No. 4 While the given candidate is onboarded, so it is not bilingual. No. 5 While the given candidate is not relocating, so it is not a graduate. No. 6 While the given candidate has a notice period that falls below 66, so it is relocating. No. 7 While the given candidate has a commute radius that falls below 82, so it is not relocating. No. 8 While the given candidate has a portfolio, so it is a graduate. No. 9 While the given candidate has a notice period that falls below 28, so it is a veteran. No. 10 While the given candidate is not a graduate, so it is not fingerprinted. No. 11 While the given candidate is bilingual, so it is fingerprinted. No. 8 wins over No. 5. No. 4 wins over No. 2. No. 6 wins over No. 7. No. 11 wins over No. 10. Question: Is the claim \"Olek is fingerprinted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025483", "pair_id": "u025483-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025483-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cb62f75b2fe2f121", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025505-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is fragile. Nandor is not oversized. Priya is not misrouted. Priya is not rerouted. Priya is not fragile. Priya is oversized. Thilo is oversized. Thilo is not rerouted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is misrouted, that parcel is not tracked. Item B. When the parcel is not oversized, and is not fragile, that parcel is not registered. Item C. When the parcel is misrouted, that parcel is not labeled. Item D. When the parcel is misrouted, that parcel is registered. Item D outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Priya is rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025505", "pair_id": "u025505-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025505-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9a207897b0d31a48", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025505-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is fragile. Nandor is not oversized. Priya is not misrouted. Priya is rerouted. Priya is not fragile. Priya is oversized. Thilo is oversized. Thilo is not rerouted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is misrouted, that parcel is not tracked. Item B. When the parcel is not oversized, and is not fragile, that parcel is not registered. Item C. When the parcel is misrouted, that parcel is not labeled. Item D. When the parcel is misrouted, that parcel is registered. Item D outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Priya is rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025505", "pair_id": "u025505-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025505-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e8920b53109839a4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025526-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz is not notarized. Shale is not merged. Quartz is not flaky. Quartz is minified. Shale is backported. Quartz is versioned. Shale is tested. Quartz is not signed. Quartz is tested. Shale is minified. Shale is not versioned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is signed, it also is not benchmarked. Clause 2: once any build is documented and also is backported and also is notarized, it also is reproducible. Clause 3: once any build is documented and also has no migration script and also is signed, it also is profiled. Clause 4: once any build is versioned, it also is not experimental. Clause 5: once any build is notarized, it also is not experimental. Clause 6: once any build is documented and also is tested and also is backported, it also is benchmarked. Clause 7: once any build is merged, it also is not fuzzed. Clause 8: once any build is documented and also is not signed, it also is experimental. Clause 9: once any build is documented and also has a migration script and also is signed, it also is linted. Clause 10: once any build is documented and also is not flaky and also is notarized, it also is tagged. Clause 11: once any build is minified, it also is documented. Clause 12: once any build is documented and also is notarized and also is not signed, it also has a security advisory. Clause 2 does not hold for a build when any build is tested. Clause 7 does not hold for a build when any build has a migration script. Clause 4 overrides Clause 8. Clause 6 overrides Clause 1. Clause 5 overrides Clause 8. Question: Which of these is true of Shale?", "options": ["has a security advisory", "is profiled", "is experimental", "is benchmarked", "is linted", "is tagged", "is reproducible"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is benchmarked", "unit_id": "u025526", "pair_id": "u025526-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025526-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6a944aa5b17c29a2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a16", "a15", "a6", "a1", "a2", "a5"]}, "attempt": 21}}
{"id": "syn-u025526-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quartz is not notarized. Shale is not merged. Quartz is not flaky. Quartz is minified. Shale is backported. Shale is notarized. Quartz is versioned. Shale is tested. Quartz is not signed. Quartz is tested. Shale is minified. Shale is not versioned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is signed, it also is not benchmarked. Clause 2: once any build is documented and also is backported and also is notarized, it also is reproducible. Clause 3: once any build is documented and also has no migration script and also is signed, it also is profiled. Clause 4: once any build is versioned, it also is not experimental. Clause 5: once any build is notarized, it also is not experimental. Clause 6: once any build is documented and also is tested and also is backported, it also is benchmarked. Clause 7: once any build is merged, it also is not fuzzed. Clause 8: once any build is documented and also is not signed, it also is experimental. Clause 9: once any build is documented and also has a migration script and also is signed, it also is linted. Clause 10: once any build is documented and also is not flaky and also is notarized, it also is tagged. Clause 11: once any build is minified, it also is documented. Clause 12: once any build is documented and also is notarized and also is not signed, it also has a security advisory. Clause 2 does not hold for a build when any build is tested. Clause 7 does not hold for a build when any build has a migration script. Clause 4 overrides Clause 8. Clause 6 overrides Clause 1. Clause 5 overrides Clause 8. Question: Which of these is true of Shale?", "options": ["has a security advisory", "is profiled", "is experimental", "is benchmarked", "is linted", "is tagged", "is reproducible"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is benchmarked", "unit_id": "u025526", "pair_id": "u025526-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025526-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b18d7d1c10c1126f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a16", "a15", "a6", "a1", "a2", "a5"]}, "attempt": 21}}
{"id": "syn-u025534-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is rerouted. Priya is stamped. Priya has a locker slot. Thilo has a locker slot. Priya is not rerouted. Liesel is stamped.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is rerouted and also has a locker slot and also is stamped, it also is refrigerated. Question: Does it follow that Priya has a locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025534", "pair_id": "u025534-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025534-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "28b1c001293c9c00", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025534-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is rerouted. Priya is stamped. Priya has no locker slot. Thilo has a locker slot. Priya is not rerouted. Liesel is stamped.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is rerouted and also has a locker slot and also is stamped, it also is refrigerated. Question: Does it follow that Priya has a locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025534", "pair_id": "u025534-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025534-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "96e80387398bdae3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025534-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is rerouted. Priya is stamped. Priya has a locker slot. Thilo has a locker slot. Priya is not rerouted. Liesel is stamped.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is rerouted, and has a locker slot, and is stamped, that parcel is refrigerated. Question: Can one infer that Priya has a locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025534", "pair_id": "u025534-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025534-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "28b1c001293c9c00", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025534-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is rerouted. Priya is stamped. Priya has no locker slot. Thilo has a locker slot. Priya is not rerouted. Liesel is stamped.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is rerouted, and has a locker slot, and is stamped, that parcel is refrigerated. Question: Can one infer that Priya has a locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025534", "pair_id": "u025534-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025534-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "96e80387398bdae3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025544-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has no collateral. Corin has a cosigner. Corin is not foreclosed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is prequalified, and is foreclosed, that borrower is not vetted. Item B. When the borrower has a cosigner, that borrower is prequalified. Item C. When the borrower is solvent, that borrower is not overdrawn. Item D. When the borrower is prequalified, and has a cosigner, and has no collateral, that borrower is vetted. Question: Can one infer that Corin is vetted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025544", "pair_id": "u025544-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025544-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "54c0010b057eb5c9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u025544-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has no collateral. Corin has a cosigner. Corin is not foreclosed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is prequalified, and is foreclosed, that borrower is not vetted. Item B. When the borrower has a cosigner, that borrower is prequalified. Item C. When the borrower is solvent, that borrower is not overdrawn. Item D. When the borrower is prequalified, and has a cosigner, and has collateral, that borrower is vetted. Question: Can one infer that Corin is vetted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025544", "pair_id": "u025544-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025544-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "764d669d96f68c12", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u025581-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has no rider. Zdenek is not a smoker. Dmitri is litigated. Agata has a rider. Yara is not a claimant. Zdenek has roadside assistance. Agata is not reinstated. Dmitri has no roadside assistance. Zdenek has no premium discount. Dmitri has a premium discount. Agata is a claimant. Yara is not a smoker. Zdenek is reinstated. Yara has no premium discount. Yara has no roadside assistance. Zdenek is not litigated. Yara is lapsed. Zdenek is lapsed. Agata has a premium discount. Dmitri is a smoker. Zdenek is not bundled.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is not grandfathered provided that it is lapsed as well as is not a smoker. Section 2: a policyholder is grandfathered provided that it is lapsed as well as is a claimant as well as has a premium discount. Section 3: a policyholder is appraised provided that it is bundled as well as is reinstated. Section 3 lapses for a policyholder if it has a rider. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it is litigated as well as has roadside assistance. Question: Zdenek is not grandfathered. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025581", "pair_id": "u025581-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025581-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "61ccb78f405207d9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025581-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has no rider. Zdenek is not a smoker. Dmitri is litigated. Agata has a rider. Yara is not a claimant. Zdenek has roadside assistance. Agata is not reinstated. Dmitri has no roadside assistance. Zdenek has no premium discount. Dmitri has a premium discount. Agata is a claimant. Yara is not a smoker. Zdenek is reinstated. Yara has no premium discount. Yara has no roadside assistance. Zdenek is not litigated. Yara is lapsed. Zdenek is lapsed. Agata has a premium discount. Dmitri is a smoker. Zdenek is not bundled.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is not grandfathered provided that it is lapsed as well as is a smoker. Section 2: a policyholder is grandfathered provided that it is lapsed as well as is a claimant as well as has a premium discount. Section 3: a policyholder is appraised provided that it is bundled as well as is reinstated. Section 3 lapses for a policyholder if it has a rider. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it is litigated as well as has roadside assistance. Question: Zdenek is not grandfathered. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025581", "pair_id": "u025581-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025581-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a5610b72efc40de0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025581-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has no rider. Zdenek is not a smoker. Dmitri is litigated. Agata has a rider. Yara is not a claimant. Zdenek has roadside assistance. Agata is not reinstated. Dmitri has no roadside assistance. Zdenek has no premium discount. Dmitri has a premium discount. Agata is a claimant. Yara is not a smoker. Zdenek is reinstated. Yara has no premium discount. Yara has no roadside assistance. Zdenek is not litigated. Yara is lapsed. Zdenek is lapsed. Agata has a premium discount. Dmitri is a smoker. Zdenek is not bundled.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is lapsed and additionally is not a smoker, it then is not grandfathered. #2 Each time a policyholder is lapsed and additionally is a claimant and additionally has a premium discount, it then is grandfathered. #3 Each time a policyholder is bundled and additionally is reinstated, it then is appraised. #3 is set aside if a policyholder has a rider. #2 is set aside if a policyholder is litigated and additionally has roadside assistance. Question: Do the terms above show that Zdenek is not grandfathered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025581", "pair_id": "u025581-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025581-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "61ccb78f405207d9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025581-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has no rider. Zdenek is not a smoker. Dmitri is litigated. Agata has a rider. Yara is not a claimant. Zdenek has roadside assistance. Agata is not reinstated. Dmitri has no roadside assistance. Zdenek has no premium discount. Dmitri has a premium discount. Agata is a claimant. Yara is not a smoker. Zdenek is reinstated. Yara has no premium discount. Yara has no roadside assistance. Zdenek is not litigated. Yara is lapsed. Zdenek is lapsed. Agata has a premium discount. Dmitri is a smoker. Zdenek is not bundled.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is lapsed and additionally is a smoker, it then is not grandfathered. #2 Each time a policyholder is lapsed and additionally is a claimant and additionally has a premium discount, it then is grandfathered. #3 Each time a policyholder is bundled and additionally is reinstated, it then is appraised. #3 is set aside if a policyholder has a rider. #2 is set aside if a policyholder is litigated and additionally has roadside assistance. Question: Do the terms above show that Zdenek is not grandfathered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025581", "pair_id": "u025581-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025581-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a5610b72efc40de0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025583-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aldebaran has a milestone total of 31. Aldebaran is resubmitted. Hadar is not preregistered. Hadar has a milestone total of 4. Aldebaran is not longitudinal. Aldebaran has a team size of 24. Hadar is not resubmitted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has no steering committee, it also is renewed. Clause 2: once any proposal is not resubmitted, it also is not cofunded. Clause 3: once any proposal is not preregistered, it also has industry backing. Clause 4: once any proposal has a patent filing, it also is interdisciplinary. Clause 5: once any proposal has no ethics clearance, it also is multicenter. Clause 6: once any proposal has a milestone total under 30, it also is a pilot study. Clause 7: once any proposal has a steering committee, it also has a field site. Clause 8: once any proposal is resubmitted, it also is collaborative. Clause 9: once any proposal has a patent filing, it also is exploratory. Clause 10: once any proposal is not longitudinal, it also is not exploratory. Clause 11: once any proposal has a milestone total of 30 or more, it also is shortlisted. Clause 12: once any proposal has a team size under 63, it also is cofunded. Clause 13: once any proposal has ethics clearance, it also is endorsed. Clause 14: once any proposal has a patent filing, it also has no industry backing. Clause 14 overrides Clause 3. Clause 9 overrides Clause 10. Clause 12 overrides Clause 2. Question: Which of these is true of Aldebaran?", "options": ["is endorsed", "is interdisciplinary", "is a pilot study", "has a field site", "is multicenter", "has industry backing", "is renewed", "is shortlisted"], "target": 7, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is shortlisted", "unit_id": "u025583", "pair_id": "u025583-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025583-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4395463645b4261c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a2", "a11", "a0", "a17", "a8", "a10", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025583-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aldebaran has a milestone total of 7. Aldebaran is resubmitted. Hadar is not preregistered. Hadar has a milestone total of 4. Aldebaran is not longitudinal. Aldebaran has a team size of 24. Hadar is not resubmitted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has no steering committee, it also is renewed. Clause 2: once any proposal is not resubmitted, it also is not cofunded. Clause 3: once any proposal is not preregistered, it also has industry backing. Clause 4: once any proposal has a patent filing, it also is interdisciplinary. Clause 5: once any proposal has no ethics clearance, it also is multicenter. Clause 6: once any proposal has a milestone total under 30, it also is a pilot study. Clause 7: once any proposal has a steering committee, it also has a field site. Clause 8: once any proposal is resubmitted, it also is collaborative. Clause 9: once any proposal has a patent filing, it also is exploratory. Clause 10: once any proposal is not longitudinal, it also is not exploratory. Clause 11: once any proposal has a milestone total of 30 or more, it also is shortlisted. Clause 12: once any proposal has a team size under 63, it also is cofunded. Clause 13: once any proposal has ethics clearance, it also is endorsed. Clause 14: once any proposal has a patent filing, it also has no industry backing. Clause 14 overrides Clause 3. Clause 9 overrides Clause 10. Clause 12 overrides Clause 2. Question: Which of these is true of Aldebaran?", "options": ["is endorsed", "is interdisciplinary", "is a pilot study", "has a field site", "is multicenter", "has industry backing", "is renewed", "is shortlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a pilot study", "unit_id": "u025583", "pair_id": "u025583-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025583-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2f96b819ee2435e1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a2", "a11", "a0", "a17", "a8", "a10", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025583-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aldebaran has a milestone total of 31. Aldebaran is resubmitted. Hadar is not preregistered. Hadar has a milestone total of 4. Aldebaran is not longitudinal. Aldebaran has a team size of 24. Hadar is not resubmitted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has no steering committee, that proposal is renewed. Item B. When the proposal is not resubmitted, that proposal is not cofunded. Item C. When the proposal is not preregistered, that proposal has industry backing. Item D. When the proposal has a patent filing, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item E. When the proposal has no ethics clearance, that proposal is multicenter. Item F. When the proposal has a milestone total of less than 30, that proposal is a pilot study. Item G. When the proposal has a steering committee, that proposal has a field site. Item H. When the proposal is resubmitted, that proposal is collaborative. Item I. When the proposal has a patent filing, that proposal is exploratory. Item J. When the proposal is not longitudinal, that proposal is not exploratory. Item K. When the proposal has a milestone total of no less than 30, that proposal is shortlisted. Item L. When the proposal has a team size of less than 63, that proposal is cofunded. Item M. When the proposal has ethics clearance, that proposal is endorsed. Item N. When the proposal has a patent filing, that proposal has no industry backing. Item N outranks Item C. Item I outranks Item J. Item L outranks Item B. Question: What applies to Aldebaran?", "options": ["is endorsed", "is interdisciplinary", "is a pilot study", "has a field site", "is multicenter", "has industry backing", "is renewed", "is shortlisted"], "target": 7, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is shortlisted", "unit_id": "u025583", "pair_id": "u025583-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025583-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4395463645b4261c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a2", "a11", "a0", "a17", "a8", "a10", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025583-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aldebaran has a milestone total of 7. Aldebaran is resubmitted. Hadar is not preregistered. Hadar has a milestone total of 4. Aldebaran is not longitudinal. Aldebaran has a team size of 24. Hadar is not resubmitted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal has no steering committee, that proposal is renewed. Item B. When the proposal is not resubmitted, that proposal is not cofunded. Item C. When the proposal is not preregistered, that proposal has industry backing. Item D. When the proposal has a patent filing, that proposal is interdisciplinary. Item E. When the proposal has no ethics clearance, that proposal is multicenter. Item F. When the proposal has a milestone total of less than 30, that proposal is a pilot study. Item G. When the proposal has a steering committee, that proposal has a field site. Item H. When the proposal is resubmitted, that proposal is collaborative. Item I. When the proposal has a patent filing, that proposal is exploratory. Item J. When the proposal is not longitudinal, that proposal is not exploratory. Item K. When the proposal has a milestone total of no less than 30, that proposal is shortlisted. Item L. When the proposal has a team size of less than 63, that proposal is cofunded. Item M. When the proposal has ethics clearance, that proposal is endorsed. Item N. When the proposal has a patent filing, that proposal has no industry backing. Item N outranks Item C. Item I outranks Item J. Item L outranks Item B. Question: What applies to Aldebaran?", "options": ["is endorsed", "is interdisciplinary", "is a pilot study", "has a field site", "is multicenter", "has industry backing", "is renewed", "is shortlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a pilot study", "unit_id": "u025583", "pair_id": "u025583-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025583-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2f96b819ee2435e1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a2", "a11", "a0", "a17", "a8", "a10", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025585-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not unionized. Hedda has a portfolio. Hedda is not bilingual. Hedda is not onboarded. Hedda is seasoned. Hedda has a background screening. Ivo is not sponsored. Rune has no portfolio. Ivo is seasoned. Hedda is sponsored. Rune is onboarded. Rune is bilingual. Hedda is unionized. Rune is not unionized. Rune has a background screening. Ivo has a portfolio.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is interviewed, that candidate is not a graduate. Item B. When the candidate is unionized, that candidate has a signing bonus. Item C. When the candidate is seasoned, that candidate is a graduate. Item D. When the candidate is not onboarded, and is not unionized, and has a portfolio, that candidate is certified. Item E. When the candidate is not onboarded, and is unionized, that candidate is not certified. Item F. When the candidate has a background screening, and is sponsored, that candidate has no signing bonus. Item G. When the candidate has a background screening, and is not bilingual, that candidate has a mentor. Item A outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item F. Item D outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Hedda is certified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025585", "pair_id": "u025585-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025585-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ccd7c81fb8ea3b7f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025585-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not unionized. Hedda has a portfolio. Hedda is not bilingual. Hedda is not onboarded. Hedda is seasoned. Hedda has a background screening. Ivo is not sponsored. Rune has no portfolio. Ivo is seasoned. Hedda is sponsored. Rune is onboarded. Rune is bilingual. Hedda is not unionized. Rune is not unionized. Rune has a background screening. Ivo has a portfolio.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is interviewed, that candidate is not a graduate. Item B. When the candidate is unionized, that candidate has a signing bonus. Item C. When the candidate is seasoned, that candidate is a graduate. Item D. When the candidate is not onboarded, and is not unionized, and has a portfolio, that candidate is certified. Item E. When the candidate is not onboarded, and is unionized, that candidate is not certified. Item F. When the candidate has a background screening, and is sponsored, that candidate has no signing bonus. Item G. When the candidate has a background screening, and is not bilingual, that candidate has a mentor. Item A outranks Item C. Item B outranks Item F. Item D outranks Item E. Question: Can one infer that Hedda is certified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025585", "pair_id": "u025585-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025585-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b56b2c4eb0eec624", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025632-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is headhunted. Mads has a visa. Sigrid has no mentor.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is freelance. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a background screening, thus it is unionized. Provision 3: when the candidate here has a background screening, thus it is not unionized. Provision 4: when the candidate here is not freelance, thus it is sponsored. Provision 5: when the candidate here is freelance, thus it has a background screening. Provision 6: when the candidate here has a mentor, thus it is not fingerprinted. Provision 3 has no effect when the candidate here is licensed. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is not licensed. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here has a visa. Question: Would it be right to say that Mads is unionized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025632", "pair_id": "u025632-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025632-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bfc1f1fbc9492aa7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025632-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is headhunted. Mads has a visa. Sigrid has no mentor.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is freelance. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a background screening, thus it is unionized. Provision 3: when the candidate here has a background screening, thus it is not unionized. Provision 4: when the candidate here is not freelance, thus it is sponsored. Provision 5: when the candidate here is freelance, thus it has a background screening. Provision 6: when the candidate here has a mentor, thus it is not fingerprinted. Provision 3 has no effect when the candidate here is licensed. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is not licensed. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here has a visa. Provision 5 has no effect when the candidate here has a visa. Question: Would it be right to say that Mads is unionized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025632", "pair_id": "u025632-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025632-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "472c4341b0c59f45", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025632-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is headhunted. Mads has a visa. Sigrid has no mentor.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is headhunted, it thereby is freelance. Point B. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is unionized. Point C. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is not unionized. Point D. If said candidate is not freelance, it thereby is sponsored. Point E. If said candidate is freelance, it thereby has a background screening. Point F. If said candidate has a mentor, it thereby is not fingerprinted. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is licensed. Point B is cancelled if said candidate is not licensed. Point B is cancelled if said candidate has a visa. Question: Statement: Mads is unionized. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025632", "pair_id": "u025632-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025632-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bfc1f1fbc9492aa7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025632-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is headhunted. Mads has a visa. Sigrid has no mentor.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is headhunted, it thereby is freelance. Point B. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is unionized. Point C. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is not unionized. Point D. If said candidate is not freelance, it thereby is sponsored. Point E. If said candidate is freelance, it thereby has a background screening. Point F. If said candidate has a mentor, it thereby is not fingerprinted. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is licensed. Point B is cancelled if said candidate is not licensed. Point B is cancelled if said candidate has a visa. Point E is cancelled if said candidate has a visa. Question: Statement: Mads is unionized. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025632", "pair_id": "u025632-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025632-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "472c4341b0c59f45", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025632-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is headhunted. Mads has a visa. Sigrid has no mentor.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is headhunted, so it is freelance. No. 2 While the given candidate has a background screening, so it is unionized. No. 3 While the given candidate has a background screening, so it is not unionized. No. 4 While the given candidate is not freelance, so it is sponsored. No. 5 While the given candidate is freelance, so it has a background screening. No. 6 While the given candidate has a mentor, so it is not fingerprinted. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is licensed. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is not licensed. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a visa. Question: Is the claim \"Mads is unionized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025632", "pair_id": "u025632-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025632-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bfc1f1fbc9492aa7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025632-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is headhunted. Mads has a visa. Sigrid has no mentor.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is headhunted, so it is freelance. No. 2 While the given candidate has a background screening, so it is unionized. No. 3 While the given candidate has a background screening, so it is not unionized. No. 4 While the given candidate is not freelance, so it is sponsored. No. 5 While the given candidate is freelance, so it has a background screening. No. 6 While the given candidate has a mentor, so it is not fingerprinted. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is licensed. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is not licensed. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a visa. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a visa. Question: Is the claim \"Mads is unionized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025632", "pair_id": "u025632-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025632-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "472c4341b0c59f45", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025668-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not damaged. Kaveh is not rerouted. Saskia has no barcode. Kaveh has no waybill. Kaveh is consolidated. Kaveh is not damaged. Saskia is not rerouted. Saskia is consolidated. Jory has a waybill. Kaveh is fragile. Jory has a barcode.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally is not consolidated, it then is misrouted. #2 Each time a parcel is misrouted and additionally has no barcode, it then is stamped. #3 Each time a parcel is not damaged, it then is not palletized. #4 Each time a parcel is damaged, it then is palletized. #5 Each time a parcel has no waybill and additionally is consolidated and additionally is fragile, it then is not misrouted. #6 Each time a parcel is rerouted, it then is not refrigerated. #4 yields to #3. #1 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Kaveh is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025668", "pair_id": "u025668-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025668-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "94e305f2ca7b4065", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025668-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Saskia is not damaged. Kaveh is not rerouted. Saskia has no barcode. Kaveh has no waybill. Kaveh is consolidated. Kaveh is not damaged. Saskia is not rerouted. Saskia is consolidated. Jory has a waybill. Kaveh is fragile. Jory has a barcode.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally is not consolidated, it then is misrouted. #2 Each time a parcel is misrouted and additionally has no barcode, it then is stamped. #3 Each time a parcel is not damaged, it then is not palletized. #4 Each time a parcel is damaged, it then is palletized. #5 Each time a parcel has a waybill and additionally is consolidated and additionally is fragile, it then is not misrouted. #6 Each time a parcel is rerouted, it then is not refrigerated. #4 yields to #3. #1 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Kaveh is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025668", "pair_id": "u025668-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025668-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "69c0d4a232764733", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025672-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach has no industry backing. Gemma has industry backing. Mirach has no field site. Mirach has no ethics clearance.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has ethics clearance plus has industry backing: then it is exploratory. Policy I is waived if that proposal has industry backing. Question: Is it so that Mirach has no field site?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025672", "pair_id": "u025672-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025672-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "478c28bd5946c37c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025672-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach has no industry backing. Gemma has industry backing. Mirach has a field site. Mirach has no ethics clearance.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has ethics clearance plus has industry backing: then it is exploratory. Policy I is waived if that proposal has industry backing. Question: Is it so that Mirach has no field site?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025672", "pair_id": "u025672-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025672-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ee0e36e0fe32d643", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025695-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is not rescheduled. Florin is not sedated. Benedek is not waitlisted. Benedek is not contagious. Florin is not rescheduled. Benedek is asthmatic. Florin is not waitlisted. Florin is contagious.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is sedated, it thereby has a chaperone. Point B. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is vaccinated. Point C. If said patient is sedated, it thereby is triaged. Point D. If said patient is asthmatic, it thereby is not triaged. Point E. If said patient is not waitlisted, it thereby has no chaperone. Point F. If said patient is contagious, it thereby is diabetic. Point G. If said patient is admitted, it thereby is not hypertensive. Point H. If said patient is ambulatory, it thereby is admitted. Point I. If said patient is vaccinated, it thereby is hypertensive. Point J. If said patient is asthmatic, it thereby is ambulatory. Point K. If said patient is sedated, it thereby is bedridden. Point L. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is not diabetic. Point M. If said patient is sedated, it thereby is not bedridden. Point E supersedes Point A. Point F supersedes Point L. Point C supersedes Point D. Point K supersedes Point M. Point I supersedes Point G. Question: Statement: Florin is hypertensive. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025695", "pair_id": "u025695-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025695-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a503e9d2bd0f3fd2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025695-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is not rescheduled. Florin is not sedated. Benedek is not waitlisted. Benedek is not contagious. Florin is not rescheduled. Benedek is asthmatic. Florin is not waitlisted. Florin is contagious.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is sedated, it thereby has a chaperone. Point B. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is vaccinated. Point C. If said patient is sedated, it thereby is triaged. Point D. If said patient is asthmatic, it thereby is not triaged. Point E. If said patient is waitlisted, it thereby has no chaperone. Point F. If said patient is contagious, it thereby is diabetic. Point G. If said patient is admitted, it thereby is not hypertensive. Point H. If said patient is ambulatory, it thereby is admitted. Point I. If said patient is vaccinated, it thereby is hypertensive. Point J. If said patient is asthmatic, it thereby is ambulatory. Point K. If said patient is sedated, it thereby is bedridden. Point L. If said patient is rescheduled, it thereby is not diabetic. Point M. If said patient is sedated, it thereby is not bedridden. Point E supersedes Point A. Point F supersedes Point L. Point C supersedes Point D. Point K supersedes Point M. Point I supersedes Point G. Question: Statement: Florin is hypertensive. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025695", "pair_id": "u025695-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025695-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "03a2182692d67ffa", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025697-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is certified. Noor is unionized. Sigrid has a diploma. Lotte is headhunted. Lotte is not unionized. Sigrid is certified.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is fingerprinted: then it is relocating. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is certified: then it has a background screening. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is relocating: then it is eligible. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is bilingual: then it is a veteran. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has a diploma: then it is interviewed. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is unionized: then it is bilingual. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate is a veteran: then it is not eligible. Policy VIII. Suppose that candidate is fingerprinted: then it is not freelance. Question: Is it so that Lotte is eligible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025697", "pair_id": "u025697-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025697-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "eb2cf96e76f7d26e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025697-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is certified. Noor is unionized. Sigrid has a diploma. Lotte is headhunted. Lotte is not unionized. Sigrid is certified.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is fingerprinted: then it is relocating. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is certified: then it has a background screening. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is headhunted: then it is fingerprinted. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is relocating: then it is eligible. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is bilingual: then it is a veteran. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate has a diploma: then it is interviewed. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate is unionized: then it is bilingual. Policy VIII. Suppose that candidate is a veteran: then it is not eligible. Policy IX. Suppose that candidate is fingerprinted: then it is not freelance. Question: Is it so that Lotte is eligible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025697", "pair_id": "u025697-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025697-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "3ae35e6fe0beb0e1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025698-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is budgeted. Capella has a review mark of 79. Capella has no field site. Capella is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 89. Fomalhaut has a field site. Fomalhaut has a review mark of 60. Capella is not budgeted.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is interdisciplinary, then it is collaborative. (2) If a proposal has a review mark of at most 84, then it is not collaborative. (3) If a proposal has a field site and has a citation index above 73, then it is not multicenter. (4) If a proposal has a field site, then it is shortlisted. (5) If a proposal has a field site and has a citation index above 73 and is budgeted, then it is multicenter. (6) If a proposal has a field site, then it is not shortlisted. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Fomalhaut is multicenter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025698", "pair_id": "u025698-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025698-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f1f90c3501a689ea", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u025698-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is budgeted. Capella has a review mark of 79. Capella has no field site. Capella is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 89. Fomalhaut has a field site. Fomalhaut has a review mark of 60. Capella is not budgeted.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is interdisciplinary, then it is collaborative. (2) If a proposal has a review mark of at most 84, then it is not collaborative. (3) If a proposal has a field site and has a citation index above 73, then it is not multicenter. (4) If a proposal has a field site, then it is shortlisted. (5) If a proposal has a field site and has a citation index of at most 73 and is budgeted, then it is multicenter. (6) If a proposal has a field site, then it is not shortlisted. When (5) and (3) clash, (5) prevails. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Fomalhaut is multicenter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025698", "pair_id": "u025698-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025698-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5dc138bbdb12e2d6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u025698-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is budgeted. Capella has a review mark of 79. Capella has no field site. Capella is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 89. Fomalhaut has a field site. Fomalhaut has a review mark of 60. Capella is not budgeted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is interdisciplinary, it also is collaborative. Clause 2: once any proposal has a review mark of 84 or less, it also is not collaborative. Clause 3: once any proposal has a field site and also has a citation index over 73, it also is not multicenter. Clause 4: once any proposal has a field site, it also is shortlisted. Clause 5: once any proposal has a field site and also has a citation index over 73 and also is budgeted, it also is multicenter. Clause 6: once any proposal has a field site, it also is not shortlisted. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Clause 4 overrides Clause 6. Question: Does it follow that Fomalhaut is multicenter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025698", "pair_id": "u025698-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025698-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f1f90c3501a689ea", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u025698-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is budgeted. Capella has a review mark of 79. Capella has no field site. Capella is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 89. Fomalhaut has a field site. Fomalhaut has a review mark of 60. Capella is not budgeted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is interdisciplinary, it also is collaborative. Clause 2: once any proposal has a review mark of 84 or less, it also is not collaborative. Clause 3: once any proposal has a field site and also has a citation index over 73, it also is not multicenter. Clause 4: once any proposal has a field site, it also is shortlisted. Clause 5: once any proposal has a field site and also has a citation index of 73 or less and also is budgeted, it also is multicenter. Clause 6: once any proposal has a field site, it also is not shortlisted. Clause 5 overrides Clause 3. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Clause 4 overrides Clause 6. Question: Does it follow that Fomalhaut is multicenter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025698", "pair_id": "u025698-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025698-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5dc138bbdb12e2d6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u025698-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is budgeted. Capella has a review mark of 79. Capella has no field site. Capella is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 89. Fomalhaut has a field site. Fomalhaut has a review mark of 60. Capella is not budgeted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is interdisciplinary, that proposal is collaborative. Item B. When the proposal has a review mark of no more than 84, that proposal is not collaborative. Item C. When the proposal has a field site, and has a citation index of more than 73, that proposal is not multicenter. Item D. When the proposal has a field site, that proposal is shortlisted. Item E. When the proposal has a field site, and has a citation index of more than 73, and is budgeted, that proposal is multicenter. Item F. When the proposal has a field site, that proposal is not shortlisted. Item E outranks Item C. Item A outranks Item B. Item D outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Fomalhaut is multicenter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025698", "pair_id": "u025698-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025698-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f1f90c3501a689ea", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u025698-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is budgeted. Capella has a review mark of 79. Capella has no field site. Capella is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 89. Fomalhaut has a field site. Fomalhaut has a review mark of 60. Capella is not budgeted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is interdisciplinary, that proposal is collaborative. Item B. When the proposal has a review mark of no more than 84, that proposal is not collaborative. Item C. When the proposal has a field site, and has a citation index of more than 73, that proposal is not multicenter. Item D. When the proposal has a field site, that proposal is shortlisted. Item E. When the proposal has a field site, and has a citation index of no more than 73, and is budgeted, that proposal is multicenter. Item F. When the proposal has a field site, that proposal is not shortlisted. Item E outranks Item C. Item A outranks Item B. Item D outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Fomalhaut is multicenter?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025698", "pair_id": "u025698-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025698-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5dc138bbdb12e2d6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u025778-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar has seed funding. Izar is not shortlisted. Izar has a citation index of 17. Izar is translational. Izar has a field site.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is shortlisted and additionally has no seed funding, it then has a postdoc. #2 Each time a proposal has no field site and additionally has a citation index of 47 or above and additionally is theoretical, it then is not budgeted. #3 Each time a proposal is shortlisted and additionally is translational and additionally has a citation index of 75 or above, it then has ethics clearance. #4 Each time a proposal has a field site and additionally has a citation index less than 47, it then is budgeted. #5 Each time a proposal is not collaborative and additionally has no seed funding, it then is longitudinal. Question: Do the terms above show that Izar is budgeted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025778", "pair_id": "u025778-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025778-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "107cf1587421d5d1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u025778-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar has seed funding. Izar is not shortlisted. Izar has a citation index of 17. Izar is translational. Izar has a field site.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is shortlisted and additionally has no seed funding, it then has a postdoc. #2 Each time a proposal has no field site and additionally has a citation index of 47 or above and additionally is theoretical, it then is not budgeted. #3 Each time a proposal is shortlisted and additionally is translational and additionally has a citation index of 75 or above, it then has ethics clearance. #4 Each time a proposal has no field site and additionally has a citation index less than 47, it then is budgeted. #5 Each time a proposal is not collaborative and additionally has no seed funding, it then is longitudinal. Question: Do the terms above show that Izar is budgeted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025778", "pair_id": "u025778-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025778-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "69c38e0b581fc81e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u025797-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is symptomatic. Xenia is admitted. Xenia is not asthmatic. Xenia is vaccinated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has a chaperone provided that it is asthmatic as well as is fasting. Section 2: a patient has a pacemaker provided that it is symptomatic as well as is fasting. Section 3: a patient has no chaperone provided that it is vaccinated. Section 3 lapses for a patient if it is admitted. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Xenia is admitted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025797", "pair_id": "u025797-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025797-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "55feea201f619d48", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025797-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not fasting. Xenia is symptomatic. Xenia is admitted. Xenia is not asthmatic. Xenia is vaccinated.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has a chaperone provided that it is asthmatic as well as is fasting. Section 2: a patient has a pacemaker provided that it is symptomatic as well as is fasting. Section 3: a patient has no chaperone provided that it is vaccinated. Section 3 lapses for a patient if it is admitted. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Xenia is admitted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025797", "pair_id": "u025797-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025797-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "724644fadfc0e07a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025797-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is symptomatic. Xenia is admitted. Xenia is not asthmatic. Xenia is vaccinated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is asthmatic and additionally is fasting, it then has a chaperone. #2 Each time a patient is symptomatic and additionally is fasting, it then has a pacemaker. #3 Each time a patient is vaccinated, it then has no chaperone. #3 is set aside if a patient is admitted. #3 yields to #1. Question: Do the terms above show that Xenia is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025797", "pair_id": "u025797-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025797-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "55feea201f619d48", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025797-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not fasting. Xenia is symptomatic. Xenia is admitted. Xenia is not asthmatic. Xenia is vaccinated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is asthmatic and additionally is fasting, it then has a chaperone. #2 Each time a patient is symptomatic and additionally is fasting, it then has a pacemaker. #3 Each time a patient is vaccinated, it then has no chaperone. #3 is set aside if a patient is admitted. #3 yields to #1. Question: Do the terms above show that Xenia is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025797", "pair_id": "u025797-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025797-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "724644fadfc0e07a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025816-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is relocating. Petra has a visa. Petra has no portfolio. Petra has a diploma. Olek is seasoned. Petra is not interviewed. Olek has a diploma. Olek is licensed. Olek is not recommended. Olek is not interviewed. Petra is recommended. Olek has a visa. Olek is not eligible.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is onboarded provided that it has a visa as well as is interviewed. Section 2: a candidate is not probationary provided that it is fingerprinted. Section 3: a candidate has a signing bonus provided that it is onboarded as well as is eligible as well as has a portfolio. Section 4: a candidate has no signing bonus provided that it is not onboarded as well as is relocating. Section 5: a candidate is not onboarded provided that it is licensed. Section 6: a candidate is probationary provided that it is relocating as well as is seasoned. Section 7: a candidate has a mentor provided that it is fingerprinted. Section 7 lapses for a candidate if it has a diploma. Section 1 lapses for a candidate if it is interviewed as well as is recommended. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Olek has no signing bonus. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025816", "pair_id": "u025816-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025816-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "33f4527908913633", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u025816-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is relocating. Petra has a visa. Petra has no portfolio. Petra has a diploma. Olek is seasoned. Petra is not interviewed. Olek has a diploma. Olek is licensed. Olek is not recommended. Olek is not interviewed. Petra is recommended. Olek has a visa. Olek is not eligible.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is onboarded provided that it has a visa as well as is interviewed. Section 2: a candidate is not probationary provided that it is fingerprinted. Section 3: a candidate has a signing bonus provided that it is onboarded as well as is eligible as well as has a portfolio. Section 4: a candidate has no signing bonus provided that it is onboarded as well as is relocating. Section 5: a candidate is not onboarded provided that it is licensed. Section 6: a candidate is probationary provided that it is relocating as well as is seasoned. Section 7: a candidate has a mentor provided that it is fingerprinted. Section 7 lapses for a candidate if it has a diploma. Section 1 lapses for a candidate if it is interviewed as well as is recommended. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Olek has no signing bonus. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025816", "pair_id": "u025816-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025816-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea2c5768bb936e4f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u025816-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is relocating. Petra has a visa. Petra has no portfolio. Petra has a diploma. Olek is seasoned. Petra is not interviewed. Olek has a diploma. Olek is licensed. Olek is not recommended. Olek is not interviewed. Petra is recommended. Olek has a visa. Olek is not eligible.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has a visa and additionally is interviewed, it then is onboarded. #2 Each time a candidate is fingerprinted, it then is not probationary. #3 Each time a candidate is onboarded and additionally is eligible and additionally has a portfolio, it then has a signing bonus. #4 Each time a candidate is not onboarded and additionally is relocating, it then has no signing bonus. #5 Each time a candidate is licensed, it then is not onboarded. #6 Each time a candidate is relocating and additionally is seasoned, it then is probationary. #7 Each time a candidate is fingerprinted, it then has a mentor. #7 is set aside if a candidate has a diploma. #1 is set aside if a candidate is interviewed and additionally is recommended. #1 yields to #5. #6 yields to #2. #3 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Olek has no signing bonus?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025816", "pair_id": "u025816-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025816-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "33f4527908913633", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u025816-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is relocating. Petra has a visa. Petra has no portfolio. Petra has a diploma. Olek is seasoned. Petra is not interviewed. Olek has a diploma. Olek is licensed. Olek is not recommended. Olek is not interviewed. Petra is recommended. Olek has a visa. Olek is not eligible.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has a visa and additionally is interviewed, it then is onboarded. #2 Each time a candidate is fingerprinted, it then is not probationary. #3 Each time a candidate is onboarded and additionally is eligible and additionally has a portfolio, it then has a signing bonus. #4 Each time a candidate is onboarded and additionally is relocating, it then has no signing bonus. #5 Each time a candidate is licensed, it then is not onboarded. #6 Each time a candidate is relocating and additionally is seasoned, it then is probationary. #7 Each time a candidate is fingerprinted, it then has a mentor. #7 is set aside if a candidate has a diploma. #1 is set aside if a candidate is interviewed and additionally is recommended. #1 yields to #5. #6 yields to #2. #3 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Olek has no signing bonus?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025816", "pair_id": "u025816-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025816-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea2c5768bb936e4f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u025826-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Olek has an aptitude quotient of 80. Olek is bonded. Olek is relocating. Olek is not onboarded. Olek has a diploma. Olek has a commute radius of 50. Olek has no visa. Olek is not headhunted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has a diploma and additionally is headhunted and additionally is bonded, it then is bilingual. #2 Each time a candidate has a background screening and additionally is relocating and additionally is onboarded, it then is unionized. #3 Each time a candidate is eligible, it then is not bilingual. #4 Each time a candidate has a diploma and additionally has an aptitude quotient of 32 or above, it then is certified. #5 Each time a candidate has a diploma, it then has no background screening. #6 Each time a candidate is bonded, it then is not recommended. #7 Each time a candidate is bonded, it then is not certified. #8 Each time a candidate is eligible, it then is not unionized. #9 Each time a candidate has a diploma and additionally is probationary, it then has a background screening. #10 Each time a candidate has a visa, it then is interviewed. #11 Each time a candidate has a diploma and additionally is bonded and additionally has a commute radius greater than 49, it then is a graduate. #9 is set aside if a candidate is headhunted. #2 is set aside if a candidate has a diploma. #6 is set aside if a candidate is relocating. #2 yields to #8. #3 yields to #1. #5 yields to #9. #4 yields to #7. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Olek?", "options": ["is certified", "is bilingual", "has a background screening", "is a graduate"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a graduate", "unit_id": "u025826", "pair_id": "u025826-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025826-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3b6ae6517f57b573", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a16", "a0", "a7"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025826-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Olek has an aptitude quotient of 80. Olek is bonded. Olek is not relocating. Olek is not onboarded. Olek has a diploma. Olek has a commute radius of 50. Olek has no visa. Olek is not headhunted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has a diploma and additionally is headhunted and additionally is bonded, it then is bilingual. #2 Each time a candidate has a background screening and additionally is relocating and additionally is onboarded, it then is unionized. #3 Each time a candidate is eligible, it then is not bilingual. #4 Each time a candidate has a diploma and additionally has an aptitude quotient of 32 or above, it then is certified. #5 Each time a candidate has a diploma, it then has no background screening. #6 Each time a candidate is bonded, it then is not recommended. #7 Each time a candidate is bonded, it then is not certified. #8 Each time a candidate is eligible, it then is not unionized. #9 Each time a candidate has a diploma and additionally is probationary, it then has a background screening. #10 Each time a candidate has a visa, it then is interviewed. #11 Each time a candidate has a diploma and additionally is bonded and additionally has a commute radius greater than 49, it then is a graduate. #9 is set aside if a candidate is headhunted. #2 is set aside if a candidate has a diploma. #6 is set aside if a candidate is relocating. #2 yields to #8. #3 yields to #1. #5 yields to #9. #4 yields to #7. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Olek?", "options": ["is certified", "is bilingual", "has a background screening", "is a graduate"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is a graduate", "unit_id": "u025826", "pair_id": "u025826-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025826-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b139f1974e0abfb5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a16", "a0", "a7"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025848-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gneiss is not minified. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 45. Gneiss is backported. Gneiss has a feature toggle. Gneiss is documented. Gneiss has a changelog. Gneiss is not obsolete.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is not tagged provided that it is reverted. Section 2: a build is tagged provided that it is localized as well as is backported. Section 3: a build is not merged provided that it is minified. Section 4: a build is not tagged provided that it is minified. Section 5: a build is linted provided that it is localized as well as is reverted as well as has a feature toggle. Section 6: a build is not reverted provided that it has a lint backlog of 26 or higher. Section 7: a build is localized provided that it is benchmarked. Section 8: a build is reverted provided that it has a test yield lower than 63. Section 9: a build is benchmarked provided that it is documented. Section 10: a build is compiled provided that it has a changelog. Section 11: a build is merged provided that it is localized as well as is obsolete. Section 11 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 6. Question: Which statement fits Gneiss?", "options": ["is linted", "is tagged", "is merged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is tagged", "unit_id": "u025848", "pair_id": "u025848-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025848-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "89966c26103b1736", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a13", "a11"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025848-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gneiss is not minified. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 45. Gneiss is backported. Gneiss has a feature toggle. Gneiss is documented. Gneiss has a changelog. Gneiss is not obsolete. Gneiss has a test yield of 47.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is not tagged provided that it is reverted. Section 2: a build is tagged provided that it is localized as well as is backported. Section 3: a build is not merged provided that it is minified. Section 4: a build is not tagged provided that it is minified. Section 5: a build is linted provided that it is localized as well as is reverted as well as has a feature toggle. Section 6: a build is not reverted provided that it has a lint backlog of 26 or higher. Section 7: a build is localized provided that it is benchmarked. Section 8: a build is reverted provided that it has a test yield lower than 63. Section 9: a build is benchmarked provided that it is documented. Section 10: a build is compiled provided that it has a changelog. Section 11: a build is merged provided that it is localized as well as is obsolete. Section 11 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 6. Question: Which statement fits Gneiss?", "options": ["is linted", "is tagged", "is merged"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is linted", "unit_id": "u025848", "pair_id": "u025848-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025848-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d584c0ab67f2a885", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a13", "a11"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u025852-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren has a risk tier of 74. Evren is not a depositor. Evren has no cosigner. Evren is foreclosed. Evren has a debt ratio of 66. Evren is creditworthy.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is audited plus is not creditworthy plus has a debt ratio no higher than 72: then it is prequalified. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is not a depositor: then it has a guarantor. Policy III. Suppose that borrower has no cosigner: then it is underwritten. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is audited plus is creditworthy plus is underwritten: then it is not prequalified. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is foreclosed plus has a risk tier no lower than 58: then it is audited. Question: Is it so that Evren is prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025852", "pair_id": "u025852-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025852-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d54716173bd61057", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025852-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren has a risk tier of 74. Evren is not a depositor. Evren has no cosigner. Evren is foreclosed. Evren has a debt ratio of 66. Evren is creditworthy.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is audited plus is not creditworthy plus has a debt ratio no higher than 72: then it is prequalified. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is a depositor: then it has a guarantor. Policy III. Suppose that borrower has no cosigner: then it is underwritten. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is audited plus is creditworthy plus is underwritten: then it is not prequalified. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is foreclosed plus has a risk tier no lower than 58: then it is audited. Question: Is it so that Evren is prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025852", "pair_id": "u025852-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025852-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "7c65b1263e1f49ea", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025857-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has no adjuster. Dmitri has a beneficiary. Agata is subrogated. Dmitri is bundled. Agata has no deductible waiver. Fabian is not subrogated. Fabian is not grandfathered. Fabian has no beneficiary. Dmitri is not grandfathered. Agata has no beneficiary. Fabian is bundled. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Dmitri has no deductible waiver. Agata is appraised.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has no beneficiary, it then is litigated. #2 Each time a policyholder is litigated, it then has a premium discount. #3 Each time a policyholder is subrogated, it then is not inspected. #4 Each time a policyholder is appraised, it then is inspected. #5 Each time a policyholder has a premium discount, it then is covered. #6 Each time a policyholder has a premium discount, it then is not covered. #7 Each time a policyholder is grandfathered, it then is not disputed. #8 Each time a policyholder has a deductible waiver, it then is not litigated. #5 is set aside if a policyholder has an adjuster. #5 is set aside if a policyholder is bundled. #6 is set aside if a policyholder has a deductible waiver. #6 is set aside if a policyholder is uninsurable. #4 yields to #3. #8 yields to #1. #6 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Dmitri is covered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025857", "pair_id": "u025857-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025857-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f19120028b8cd019", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025857-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has no adjuster. Dmitri has a beneficiary. Agata is subrogated. Dmitri is bundled. Agata has no deductible waiver. Fabian is not subrogated. Fabian is not grandfathered. Fabian has no beneficiary. Dmitri is not grandfathered. Agata has no beneficiary. Fabian is bundled. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Dmitri has no deductible waiver. Agata is appraised.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder has a beneficiary, it then is litigated. #2 Each time a policyholder is litigated, it then has a premium discount. #3 Each time a policyholder is subrogated, it then is not inspected. #4 Each time a policyholder is appraised, it then is inspected. #5 Each time a policyholder has a premium discount, it then is covered. #6 Each time a policyholder has a premium discount, it then is not covered. #7 Each time a policyholder is grandfathered, it then is not disputed. #8 Each time a policyholder has a deductible waiver, it then is not litigated. #5 is set aside if a policyholder has an adjuster. #5 is set aside if a policyholder is bundled. #6 is set aside if a policyholder has a deductible waiver. #6 is set aside if a policyholder is uninsurable. #4 yields to #3. #8 yields to #1. #6 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Dmitri is covered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025857", "pair_id": "u025857-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025857-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "25a0e5e70ba950f0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025879-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh has a postal zone of 25. Liesel has a barcode. Liesel has a parcel volume of 41. Kaveh is weighed. Kaveh is not misrouted. Kaveh has a delivery window of 84. Liesel is hazardous. Kaveh is registered. Kaveh is hazardous. Kaveh has a weight class of 88. Liesel has a postal zone of 46. Kaveh has a parcel volume of 21. Liesel is misrouted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel has a postal zone of no less than 22, and has a weight class of more than 70, that parcel is delayed. Item B. When the parcel has a postal zone of no less than 22, and has a weight class of no more than 70, that parcel is not delayed. Item C. When the parcel has a barcode, and is registered, that parcel has a courier. Item D. When the parcel has a delivery window of less than 11, that parcel has no courier. Item E. When the parcel is misrouted, and is weighed, and has a barcode, that parcel has a locker slot. Item A is suspended when the parcel has a parcel volume of less than 21, and is registered. Item C is suspended when the parcel is hazardous. Item B is suspended when the parcel is hazardous. Item A outranks Item B. Item C outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Kaveh is delayed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u025879", "pair_id": "u025879-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025879-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4a83eb22a6a6bcb4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u025879-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kaveh has a postal zone of 25. Liesel has a barcode. Liesel has a parcel volume of 41. Kaveh is weighed. Kaveh is not misrouted. Kaveh has a delivery window of 84. Liesel is hazardous. Kaveh is registered. Kaveh is hazardous. Kaveh has a weight class of 88. Liesel has a postal zone of 46. Kaveh has a parcel volume of 21. Liesel is misrouted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel has a postal zone of no less than 22, and has a weight class of more than 70, that parcel is delayed. Item B. When the parcel has a postal zone of no less than 22, and has a weight class of no more than 70, that parcel is not delayed. Item C. When the parcel has a barcode, and is registered, that parcel has a courier. Item D. When the parcel has a delivery window of less than 11, that parcel has no courier. Item E. When the parcel is misrouted, and is weighed, and has a barcode, that parcel has a locker slot. Item A is suspended when the parcel has a parcel volume of less than 79, and is registered. Item C is suspended when the parcel is hazardous. Item B is suspended when the parcel is hazardous. Item A outranks Item B. Item C outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Kaveh is delayed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u025879", "pair_id": "u025879-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025879-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1c635eacecbb9db6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u025913-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ivo is not unionized. Ivo is not seasoned. Sigrid is not fingerprinted. Sigrid is seasoned. Ivo is fingerprinted. Petra is fingerprinted. Ivo is not licensed. Petra is unionized. Sigrid is licensed. Ivo has no diploma. Sigrid has a notice period of 50.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a notice period of minimum 27, it thereby is not interviewed. Point B. If said candidate is seasoned, it thereby is bonded. Point C. If said candidate is freelance, it thereby is a graduate. Point D. If said candidate has a notice period of maximum 83, it thereby is recommended. Point E. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is bilingual. Point F. If said candidate is eligible, it thereby is relocating. Point G. If said candidate is recommended, it thereby has a background screening. Point H. If said candidate has a diploma, it thereby is not certified. Point I. If said candidate is unionized, it thereby has a mentor. Point J. If said candidate is fingerprinted, it thereby is probationary. Point K. If said candidate is probationary, it thereby is freelance. Point L. If said candidate is bonded, it thereby is eligible. Point E is cancelled if said candidate is fingerprinted. Point F is cancelled if said candidate is licensed. Point H is cancelled if said candidate is unionized. Point I is cancelled if said candidate is seasoned. Question: Which choice is true for Ivo?", "options": ["is bilingual", "is a graduate", "is relocating"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a graduate", "unit_id": "u025913", "pair_id": "u025913-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025913-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5421ae4d551e7889", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a13", "a11", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025913-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ivo is not unionized. Ivo is not seasoned. Sigrid is not fingerprinted. Sigrid is seasoned. Ivo is fingerprinted. Petra is fingerprinted. Ivo is not licensed. Petra is unionized. Sigrid is licensed. Ivo has a notice period of 70. Ivo has no diploma. Sigrid has a notice period of 50.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a notice period of minimum 27, it thereby is not interviewed. Point B. If said candidate is seasoned, it thereby is bonded. Point C. If said candidate is freelance, it thereby is a graduate. Point D. If said candidate has a notice period of maximum 83, it thereby is recommended. Point E. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is bilingual. Point F. If said candidate is eligible, it thereby is relocating. Point G. If said candidate is recommended, it thereby has a background screening. Point H. If said candidate has a diploma, it thereby is not certified. Point I. If said candidate is unionized, it thereby has a mentor. Point J. If said candidate is fingerprinted, it thereby is probationary. Point K. If said candidate is probationary, it thereby is freelance. Point L. If said candidate is bonded, it thereby is eligible. Point E is cancelled if said candidate is fingerprinted. Point F is cancelled if said candidate is licensed. Point H is cancelled if said candidate is unionized. Point I is cancelled if said candidate is seasoned. Question: Which choice is true for Ivo?", "options": ["is bilingual", "is a graduate", "is relocating"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a graduate", "unit_id": "u025913", "pair_id": "u025913-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025913-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c5c7e9d76c09d267", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a13", "a11", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025913-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ivo is not unionized. Ivo is not seasoned. Sigrid is not fingerprinted. Sigrid is seasoned. Ivo is fingerprinted. Petra is fingerprinted. Ivo is not licensed. Petra is unionized. Sigrid is licensed. Ivo has no diploma. Sigrid has a notice period of 50.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a notice period not below 27, so it is not interviewed. No. 2 While the given candidate is seasoned, so it is bonded. No. 3 While the given candidate is freelance, so it is a graduate. No. 4 While the given candidate has a notice period not above 83, so it is recommended. No. 5 While the given candidate has a background screening, so it is bilingual. No. 6 While the given candidate is eligible, so it is relocating. No. 7 While the given candidate is recommended, so it has a background screening. No. 8 While the given candidate has a diploma, so it is not certified. No. 9 While the given candidate is unionized, so it has a mentor. No. 10 While the given candidate is fingerprinted, so it is probationary. No. 11 While the given candidate is probationary, so it is freelance. No. 12 While the given candidate is bonded, so it is eligible. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given candidate is fingerprinted. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given candidate is licensed. No. 8 stops applying as long as the given candidate is unionized. No. 9 stops applying as long as the given candidate is seasoned. Question: Select what holds for Ivo: which option?", "options": ["is bilingual", "is a graduate", "is relocating"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a graduate", "unit_id": "u025913", "pair_id": "u025913-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025913-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5421ae4d551e7889", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a13", "a11", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025913-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ivo is not unionized. Ivo is not seasoned. Sigrid is not fingerprinted. Sigrid is seasoned. Ivo is fingerprinted. Petra is fingerprinted. Ivo is not licensed. Petra is unionized. Sigrid is licensed. Ivo has a notice period of 70. Ivo has no diploma. Sigrid has a notice period of 50.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate has a notice period not below 27, so it is not interviewed. No. 2 While the given candidate is seasoned, so it is bonded. No. 3 While the given candidate is freelance, so it is a graduate. No. 4 While the given candidate has a notice period not above 83, so it is recommended. No. 5 While the given candidate has a background screening, so it is bilingual. No. 6 While the given candidate is eligible, so it is relocating. No. 7 While the given candidate is recommended, so it has a background screening. No. 8 While the given candidate has a diploma, so it is not certified. No. 9 While the given candidate is unionized, so it has a mentor. No. 10 While the given candidate is fingerprinted, so it is probationary. No. 11 While the given candidate is probationary, so it is freelance. No. 12 While the given candidate is bonded, so it is eligible. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given candidate is fingerprinted. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given candidate is licensed. No. 8 stops applying as long as the given candidate is unionized. No. 9 stops applying as long as the given candidate is seasoned. Question: Select what holds for Ivo: which option?", "options": ["is bilingual", "is a graduate", "is relocating"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a graduate", "unit_id": "u025913", "pair_id": "u025913-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/9", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025913-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c5c7e9d76c09d267", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a13", "a11", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025919-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna is not certified. Mads is licensed. Noor is not certified. Jasna is unionized. Mads is not seasoned. Mads is certified. Noor is unionized. Ivo is licensed. Jasna is licensed. Ivo is not unionized. Jasna is not seasoned. Ivo is sponsored. Ivo is not certified.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is not certified, it thereby is freelance. Point B. If said candidate is not seasoned, it thereby is a graduate. Point C. If said candidate is not seasoned, it thereby is not a graduate. Point A is cancelled if said candidate is sponsored. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is not unionized. Point B is cancelled if said candidate is licensed. Point B is cancelled if said candidate is unionized. Question: Statement: Jasna is a graduate. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025919", "pair_id": "u025919-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/11", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025919-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a82bf5f993fc130c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025919-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna is not certified. Mads is licensed. Noor is not certified. Jasna is unionized. Mads is not seasoned. Mads is certified. Noor is unionized. Ivo is licensed. Jasna is licensed. Ivo is not unionized. Jasna is not seasoned. Jasna is sponsored. Ivo is sponsored. Ivo is not certified.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is not certified, it thereby is freelance. Point B. If said candidate is not seasoned, it thereby is a graduate. Point C. If said candidate is not seasoned, it thereby is not a graduate. Point A is cancelled if said candidate is sponsored. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is not unionized. Point B is cancelled if said candidate is licensed. Point B is cancelled if said candidate is unionized. Question: Statement: Jasna is a graduate. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025919", "pair_id": "u025919-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/11", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025919-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "78cfe3260a4b297b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025919-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna is not certified. Mads is licensed. Noor is not certified. Jasna is unionized. Mads is not seasoned. Mads is certified. Noor is unionized. Ivo is licensed. Jasna is licensed. Ivo is not unionized. Jasna is not seasoned. Ivo is sponsored. Ivo is not certified.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is not certified, so it is freelance. No. 2 While the given candidate is not seasoned, so it is a graduate. No. 3 While the given candidate is not seasoned, so it is not a graduate. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given candidate is sponsored. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is not unionized. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is licensed. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is unionized. Question: Is the claim \"Jasna is a graduate\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025919", "pair_id": "u025919-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/11", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025919-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a82bf5f993fc130c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025919-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna is not certified. Mads is licensed. Noor is not certified. Jasna is unionized. Mads is not seasoned. Mads is certified. Noor is unionized. Ivo is licensed. Jasna is licensed. Ivo is not unionized. Jasna is not seasoned. Jasna is sponsored. Ivo is sponsored. Ivo is not certified.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is not certified, so it is freelance. No. 2 While the given candidate is not seasoned, so it is a graduate. No. 3 While the given candidate is not seasoned, so it is not a graduate. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given candidate is sponsored. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is not unionized. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is licensed. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is unionized. Question: Is the claim \"Jasna is a graduate\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u025919", "pair_id": "u025919-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/11", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025919-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "78cfe3260a4b297b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025923-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Greta is pensioned. Bastien is not overdrawn. Greta has no mortgage. Folke is not bankrupt. Ilse is vetted. Folke is delinquent. Greta is not audited. Folke is pensioned. Ilse has no escrow account. Greta has no escrow account. Bastien is not vetted. Bastien has no mortgage. Bastien is not audited. Ilse is not bankrupt. Bastien is not a depositor. Greta is bankrupt. Ilse is audited. Folke is not audited. Folke is a depositor. Greta is delinquent. Ilse is overdrawn. Greta is a depositor. Greta is overdrawn. Greta is vetted.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is bankrupt, then it is not employed. (2) If a borrower is solvent, then it is not prequalified. (3) If a borrower is not audited, then it is indebted. (4) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it is not creditworthy. (5) If a borrower is not audited, then it has no lien. (6) If a borrower is solvent, then it is garnished. (7) If a borrower is delinquent, then it is not indebted. (8) If a borrower is creditworthy, then it is prequalified. (9) If a borrower is not pensioned, then it is employed. (10) If a borrower is pensioned, then it is creditworthy. (11) If a borrower has no escrow account, then it is solvent. (12) If a borrower is not indebted, then it is underwritten. (13) If a borrower is a depositor, then it is not solvent. (12) is void if the borrower is a depositor. (6) is void if the borrower is not overdrawn. (1) is void if the borrower is not vetted. When (2) and (8) clash, (2) prevails. When (4) and (10) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (7) clash, (3) prevails. When (9) and (1) clash, (9) prevails. When (13) and (11) clash, (13) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Greta?", "options": ["is garnished", "is underwritten", "is prequalified"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is prequalified", "unit_id": "u025923", "pair_id": "u025923-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025923-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f45403ad6a8161f0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025923-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Greta is pensioned. Bastien is not overdrawn. Greta has no mortgage. Folke is not bankrupt. Ilse is vetted. Folke is delinquent. Greta is not audited. Folke is pensioned. Ilse has no escrow account. Greta has no escrow account. Bastien is not vetted. Bastien has no mortgage. Bastien is not audited. Ilse is not bankrupt. Bastien is not a depositor. Greta is bankrupt. Ilse is audited. Folke is not audited. Folke is a depositor. Greta is delinquent. Ilse is overdrawn. Greta is a depositor. Greta is overdrawn. Greta is vetted.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is bankrupt, then it is not employed. (2) If a borrower is solvent, then it is not prequalified. (3) If a borrower is not audited, then it is indebted. (4) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it is not creditworthy. (5) If a borrower is not audited, then it has no lien. (6) If a borrower is solvent, then it is garnished. (7) If a borrower is delinquent, then it is not indebted. (8) If a borrower is creditworthy, then it is prequalified. (9) If a borrower is not pensioned, then it is employed. (10) If a borrower is pensioned, then it is creditworthy. (11) If a borrower has no escrow account, then it is solvent. (12) If a borrower is not indebted, then it is underwritten. (13) If a borrower is a depositor, then it is not solvent. (12) is void if the borrower is a depositor. (6) is void if the borrower is not overdrawn. (1) is void if the borrower is not vetted. When (2) and (8) clash, (2) prevails. When (4) and (10) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (7) clash, (3) prevails. When (9) and (1) clash, (9) prevails. When (11) and (13) clash, (11) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Greta?", "options": ["is garnished", "is underwritten", "is prequalified"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is garnished", "unit_id": "u025923", "pair_id": "u025923-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025923-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "20c43ea7cb99c344", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025923-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Greta is pensioned. Bastien is not overdrawn. Greta has no mortgage. Folke is not bankrupt. Ilse is vetted. Folke is delinquent. Greta is not audited. Folke is pensioned. Ilse has no escrow account. Greta has no escrow account. Bastien is not vetted. Bastien has no mortgage. Bastien is not audited. Ilse is not bankrupt. Bastien is not a depositor. Greta is bankrupt. Ilse is audited. Folke is not audited. Folke is a depositor. Greta is delinquent. Ilse is overdrawn. Greta is a depositor. Greta is overdrawn. Greta is vetted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is bankrupt, it also is not employed. Clause 2: once any borrower is solvent, it also is not prequalified. Clause 3: once any borrower is not audited, it also is indebted. Clause 4: once any borrower has a mortgage, it also is not creditworthy. Clause 5: once any borrower is not audited, it also has no lien. Clause 6: once any borrower is solvent, it also is garnished. Clause 7: once any borrower is delinquent, it also is not indebted. Clause 8: once any borrower is creditworthy, it also is prequalified. Clause 9: once any borrower is not pensioned, it also is employed. Clause 10: once any borrower is pensioned, it also is creditworthy. Clause 11: once any borrower has no escrow account, it also is solvent. Clause 12: once any borrower is not indebted, it also is underwritten. Clause 13: once any borrower is a depositor, it also is not solvent. Clause 12 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is a depositor. Clause 6 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is not overdrawn. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is not vetted. Clause 2 overrides Clause 8. Clause 4 overrides Clause 10. Clause 3 overrides Clause 7. Clause 9 overrides Clause 1. Clause 13 overrides Clause 11. Question: Which of these is true of Greta?", "options": ["is garnished", "is underwritten", "is prequalified"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is prequalified", "unit_id": "u025923", "pair_id": "u025923-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025923-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f45403ad6a8161f0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025923-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Greta is pensioned. Bastien is not overdrawn. Greta has no mortgage. Folke is not bankrupt. Ilse is vetted. Folke is delinquent. Greta is not audited. Folke is pensioned. Ilse has no escrow account. Greta has no escrow account. Bastien is not vetted. Bastien has no mortgage. Bastien is not audited. Ilse is not bankrupt. Bastien is not a depositor. Greta is bankrupt. Ilse is audited. Folke is not audited. Folke is a depositor. Greta is delinquent. Ilse is overdrawn. Greta is a depositor. Greta is overdrawn. Greta is vetted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is bankrupt, it also is not employed. Clause 2: once any borrower is solvent, it also is not prequalified. Clause 3: once any borrower is not audited, it also is indebted. Clause 4: once any borrower has a mortgage, it also is not creditworthy. Clause 5: once any borrower is not audited, it also has no lien. Clause 6: once any borrower is solvent, it also is garnished. Clause 7: once any borrower is delinquent, it also is not indebted. Clause 8: once any borrower is creditworthy, it also is prequalified. Clause 9: once any borrower is not pensioned, it also is employed. Clause 10: once any borrower is pensioned, it also is creditworthy. Clause 11: once any borrower has no escrow account, it also is solvent. Clause 12: once any borrower is not indebted, it also is underwritten. Clause 13: once any borrower is a depositor, it also is not solvent. Clause 12 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is a depositor. Clause 6 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is not overdrawn. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is not vetted. Clause 2 overrides Clause 8. Clause 4 overrides Clause 10. Clause 3 overrides Clause 7. Clause 9 overrides Clause 1. Clause 11 overrides Clause 13. Question: Which of these is true of Greta?", "options": ["is garnished", "is underwritten", "is prequalified"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is garnished", "unit_id": "u025923", "pair_id": "u025923-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025923-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "20c43ea7cb99c344", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025923-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Greta is pensioned. Bastien is not overdrawn. Greta has no mortgage. Folke is not bankrupt. Ilse is vetted. Folke is delinquent. Greta is not audited. Folke is pensioned. Ilse has no escrow account. Greta has no escrow account. Bastien is not vetted. Bastien has no mortgage. Bastien is not audited. Ilse is not bankrupt. Bastien is not a depositor. Greta is bankrupt. Ilse is audited. Folke is not audited. Folke is a depositor. Greta is delinquent. Ilse is overdrawn. Greta is a depositor. Greta is overdrawn. Greta is vetted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is bankrupt, that borrower is not employed. Item B. When the borrower is solvent, that borrower is not prequalified. Item C. When the borrower is not audited, that borrower is indebted. Item D. When the borrower has a mortgage, that borrower is not creditworthy. Item E. When the borrower is not audited, that borrower has no lien. Item F. When the borrower is solvent, that borrower is garnished. Item G. When the borrower is delinquent, that borrower is not indebted. Item H. When the borrower is creditworthy, that borrower is prequalified. Item I. When the borrower is not pensioned, that borrower is employed. Item J. When the borrower is pensioned, that borrower is creditworthy. Item K. When the borrower has no escrow account, that borrower is solvent. Item L. When the borrower is not indebted, that borrower is underwritten. Item M. When the borrower is a depositor, that borrower is not solvent. Item L is suspended when the borrower is a depositor. Item F is suspended when the borrower is not overdrawn. Item A is suspended when the borrower is not vetted. Item B outranks Item H. Item D outranks Item J. Item C outranks Item G. Item I outranks Item A. Item M outranks Item K. Question: What applies to Greta?", "options": ["is garnished", "is underwritten", "is prequalified"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is prequalified", "unit_id": "u025923", "pair_id": "u025923-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025923-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f45403ad6a8161f0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025923-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Greta is pensioned. Bastien is not overdrawn. Greta has no mortgage. Folke is not bankrupt. Ilse is vetted. Folke is delinquent. Greta is not audited. Folke is pensioned. Ilse has no escrow account. Greta has no escrow account. Bastien is not vetted. Bastien has no mortgage. Bastien is not audited. Ilse is not bankrupt. Bastien is not a depositor. Greta is bankrupt. Ilse is audited. Folke is not audited. Folke is a depositor. Greta is delinquent. Ilse is overdrawn. Greta is a depositor. Greta is overdrawn. Greta is vetted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is bankrupt, that borrower is not employed. Item B. When the borrower is solvent, that borrower is not prequalified. Item C. When the borrower is not audited, that borrower is indebted. Item D. When the borrower has a mortgage, that borrower is not creditworthy. Item E. When the borrower is not audited, that borrower has no lien. Item F. When the borrower is solvent, that borrower is garnished. Item G. When the borrower is delinquent, that borrower is not indebted. Item H. When the borrower is creditworthy, that borrower is prequalified. Item I. When the borrower is not pensioned, that borrower is employed. Item J. When the borrower is pensioned, that borrower is creditworthy. Item K. When the borrower has no escrow account, that borrower is solvent. Item L. When the borrower is not indebted, that borrower is underwritten. Item M. When the borrower is a depositor, that borrower is not solvent. Item L is suspended when the borrower is a depositor. Item F is suspended when the borrower is not overdrawn. Item A is suspended when the borrower is not vetted. Item B outranks Item H. Item D outranks Item J. Item C outranks Item G. Item I outranks Item A. Item K outranks Item M. Question: What applies to Greta?", "options": ["is garnished", "is underwritten", "is prequalified"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is garnished", "unit_id": "u025923", "pair_id": "u025923-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025923-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "20c43ea7cb99c344", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a3", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025928-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar is obsolete. Zircon has a test yield of 56. Feldspar has a test yield of 55. Feldspar is fuzzed. Feldspar has a lint backlog of 65. Feldspar is versioned.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is fuzzed, thus it is not merged. Provision 2: when the build here is merged, thus it is benchmarked. Provision 3: when the build here is localized, thus it has a changelog. Provision 4: when the build here is flaky, thus it is compiled. Provision 5: when the build here is merged, thus it is not compiled. Provision 6: when the build here is obsolete, thus it is merged. Provision 7: when the build here is minified, thus it is notarized. Provision 8: when the build here has a test yield at or below 38, thus it is minified. Provision 9: when the build here is benchmarked, thus it is reproducible. Provision 10: when the build here is notarized, thus it has a migration script. Provision 11: when the build here is versioned, thus it is documented. Provision 12: when the build here is documented, thus it is flaky. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Feldspar?", "options": ["is reproducible", "is compiled", "has a migration script"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u025928", "pair_id": "u025928-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025928-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "178e9c3ed43a3a16", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a9", "a11", "a2"]}, "attempt": 18}}
{"id": "syn-u025928-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar is obsolete. Feldspar is localized. Zircon has a test yield of 56. Feldspar has a test yield of 55. Feldspar is fuzzed. Feldspar has a lint backlog of 65. Feldspar is versioned.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is fuzzed, thus it is not merged. Provision 2: when the build here is merged, thus it is benchmarked. Provision 3: when the build here is localized, thus it has a changelog. Provision 4: when the build here is flaky, thus it is compiled. Provision 5: when the build here is merged, thus it is not compiled. Provision 6: when the build here is obsolete, thus it is merged. Provision 7: when the build here is minified, thus it is notarized. Provision 8: when the build here has a test yield at or below 38, thus it is minified. Provision 9: when the build here is benchmarked, thus it is reproducible. Provision 10: when the build here is notarized, thus it has a migration script. Provision 11: when the build here is versioned, thus it is documented. Provision 12: when the build here is documented, thus it is flaky. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Feldspar?", "options": ["is reproducible", "is compiled", "has a migration script"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u025928", "pair_id": "u025928-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025928-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "dbbf65c56fdf1fa4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a9", "a11", "a2"]}, "attempt": 18}}
{"id": "syn-u025928-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar is obsolete. Zircon has a test yield of 56. Feldspar has a test yield of 55. Feldspar is fuzzed. Feldspar has a lint backlog of 65. Feldspar is versioned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is fuzzed, so it is not merged. No. 2 While the given build is merged, so it is benchmarked. No. 3 While the given build is localized, so it has a changelog. No. 4 While the given build is flaky, so it is compiled. No. 5 While the given build is merged, so it is not compiled. No. 6 While the given build is obsolete, so it is merged. No. 7 While the given build is minified, so it is notarized. No. 8 While the given build has a test yield not above 38, so it is minified. No. 9 While the given build is benchmarked, so it is reproducible. No. 10 While the given build is notarized, so it has a migration script. No. 11 While the given build is versioned, so it is documented. No. 12 While the given build is documented, so it is flaky. No. 1 wins over No. 6. No. 5 wins over No. 4. Question: Select what holds for Feldspar: which option?", "options": ["is reproducible", "is compiled", "has a migration script"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u025928", "pair_id": "u025928-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025928-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "178e9c3ed43a3a16", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a9", "a11", "a2"]}, "attempt": 18}}
{"id": "syn-u025928-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Feldspar is obsolete. Feldspar is localized. Zircon has a test yield of 56. Feldspar has a test yield of 55. Feldspar is fuzzed. Feldspar has a lint backlog of 65. Feldspar is versioned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is fuzzed, so it is not merged. No. 2 While the given build is merged, so it is benchmarked. No. 3 While the given build is localized, so it has a changelog. No. 4 While the given build is flaky, so it is compiled. No. 5 While the given build is merged, so it is not compiled. No. 6 While the given build is obsolete, so it is merged. No. 7 While the given build is minified, so it is notarized. No. 8 While the given build has a test yield not above 38, so it is minified. No. 9 While the given build is benchmarked, so it is reproducible. No. 10 While the given build is notarized, so it has a migration script. No. 11 While the given build is versioned, so it is documented. No. 12 While the given build is documented, so it is flaky. No. 1 wins over No. 6. No. 5 wins over No. 4. Question: Select what holds for Feldspar: which option?", "options": ["is reproducible", "is compiled", "has a migration script"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u025928", "pair_id": "u025928-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u025928-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "dbbf65c56fdf1fa4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a9", "a11", "a2"]}, "attempt": 18}}
{"id": "syn-u025951-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara is indemnified. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 51. Yara is not subrogated. Wanda is bundled. Yara has no flood coverage. Wanda has no flood coverage. Wanda has a claim frequency of 93. Wanda has a peril factor of 88. Yara has a payout ceiling of 50. Wanda is indemnified. Wanda is not a claimant.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is indemnified while has flood coverage, thus it has a deductible waiver. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is indemnified while has a claim frequency beyond 65, thus it is uninsurable. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is a claimant while is covered, thus it is not reinstated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is indemnified while has a peril factor beyond 66 while has flood coverage, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is indemnified while has a peril factor at or below 66 while is bundled, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is indemnified while has roadside assistance while is bundled, thus it is appraised. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it is not appraised. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is indemnified while is bundled, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling at or below 49, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here has roadside assistance. Provision 2 has no effect when the policyholder here is bundled. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Which one describes Wanda?", "options": ["is appraised", "has a deductible waiver", "is reimbursed", "is uninsurable", "is grandfathered", "has a premium discount"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u025951", "pair_id": "u025951-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025951-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "efc5dc73f82f7cbd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a9", "a6", "a5", "a11", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025951-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara is indemnified. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 51. Yara is not subrogated. Wanda is subrogated. Wanda is bundled. Yara has no flood coverage. Wanda has no flood coverage. Wanda has a claim frequency of 93. Wanda has a peril factor of 88. Yara has a payout ceiling of 50. Wanda is indemnified. Wanda is not a claimant.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is indemnified while has flood coverage, thus it has a deductible waiver. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is indemnified while has a claim frequency beyond 65, thus it is uninsurable. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is a claimant while is covered, thus it is not reinstated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is indemnified while has a peril factor beyond 66 while has flood coverage, thus it has a premium discount. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is indemnified while has a peril factor at or below 66 while is bundled, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is indemnified while has roadside assistance while is bundled, thus it is appraised. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it is not appraised. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is indemnified while is bundled, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has a payout ceiling at or below 49, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here has roadside assistance. Provision 2 has no effect when the policyholder here is bundled. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Which one describes Wanda?", "options": ["is appraised", "has a deductible waiver", "is reimbursed", "is uninsurable", "is grandfathered", "has a premium discount"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u025951", "pair_id": "u025951-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025951-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "adca78637dc1952f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a9", "a6", "a5", "a11", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025951-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara is indemnified. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 51. Yara is not subrogated. Wanda is bundled. Yara has no flood coverage. Wanda has no flood coverage. Wanda has a claim frequency of 93. Wanda has a peril factor of 88. Yara has a payout ceiling of 50. Wanda is indemnified. Wanda is not a claimant.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is indemnified and further has flood coverage, it thereby has a deductible waiver. Point B. If said policyholder is indemnified and further has a claim frequency in excess of 65, it thereby is uninsurable. Point C. If said policyholder is a claimant and further is covered, it thereby is not reinstated. Point D. If said policyholder is indemnified and further has a peril factor in excess of 66 and further has flood coverage, it thereby has a premium discount. Point E. If said policyholder is indemnified and further has a peril factor of maximum 66 and further is bundled, it thereby is grandfathered. Point F. If said policyholder is indemnified and further has roadside assistance and further is bundled, it thereby is appraised. Point G. If said policyholder is subrogated, it thereby is not appraised. Point H. If said policyholder is indemnified and further is bundled, it thereby is reimbursed. Point I. If said policyholder has a payout ceiling of maximum 49, it thereby is not reimbursed. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder has roadside assistance. Point B is cancelled if said policyholder is bundled. Point I supersedes Point H. Point F supersedes Point G. Question: Which choice is true for Wanda?", "options": ["is appraised", "has a deductible waiver", "is reimbursed", "is uninsurable", "is grandfathered", "has a premium discount"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u025951", "pair_id": "u025951-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025951-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "efc5dc73f82f7cbd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a9", "a6", "a5", "a11", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025951-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara is indemnified. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 51. Yara is not subrogated. Wanda is subrogated. Wanda is bundled. Yara has no flood coverage. Wanda has no flood coverage. Wanda has a claim frequency of 93. Wanda has a peril factor of 88. Yara has a payout ceiling of 50. Wanda is indemnified. Wanda is not a claimant.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is indemnified and further has flood coverage, it thereby has a deductible waiver. Point B. If said policyholder is indemnified and further has a claim frequency in excess of 65, it thereby is uninsurable. Point C. If said policyholder is a claimant and further is covered, it thereby is not reinstated. Point D. If said policyholder is indemnified and further has a peril factor in excess of 66 and further has flood coverage, it thereby has a premium discount. Point E. If said policyholder is indemnified and further has a peril factor of maximum 66 and further is bundled, it thereby is grandfathered. Point F. If said policyholder is indemnified and further has roadside assistance and further is bundled, it thereby is appraised. Point G. If said policyholder is subrogated, it thereby is not appraised. Point H. If said policyholder is indemnified and further is bundled, it thereby is reimbursed. Point I. If said policyholder has a payout ceiling of maximum 49, it thereby is not reimbursed. Point A is cancelled if said policyholder has roadside assistance. Point B is cancelled if said policyholder is bundled. Point I supersedes Point H. Point F supersedes Point G. Question: Which choice is true for Wanda?", "options": ["is appraised", "has a deductible waiver", "is reimbursed", "is uninsurable", "is grandfathered", "has a premium discount"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u025951", "pair_id": "u025951-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025951-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "adca78637dc1952f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a9", "a6", "a5", "a11", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025951-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara is indemnified. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 51. Yara is not subrogated. Wanda is bundled. Yara has no flood coverage. Wanda has no flood coverage. Wanda has a claim frequency of 93. Wanda has a peril factor of 88. Yara has a payout ceiling of 50. Wanda is indemnified. Wanda is not a claimant.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is indemnified and likewise has flood coverage, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 2 While the given policyholder is indemnified and likewise has a claim frequency that exceeds 65, so it is uninsurable. No. 3 While the given policyholder is a claimant and likewise is covered, so it is not reinstated. No. 4 While the given policyholder is indemnified and likewise has a peril factor that exceeds 66 and likewise has flood coverage, so it has a premium discount. No. 5 While the given policyholder is indemnified and likewise has a peril factor not above 66 and likewise is bundled, so it is grandfathered. No. 6 While the given policyholder is indemnified and likewise has roadside assistance and likewise is bundled, so it is appraised. No. 7 While the given policyholder is subrogated, so it is not appraised. No. 8 While the given policyholder is indemnified and likewise is bundled, so it is reimbursed. No. 9 While the given policyholder has a payout ceiling not above 49, so it is not reimbursed. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has roadside assistance. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is bundled. No. 9 wins over No. 8. No. 6 wins over No. 7. Question: Select what holds for Wanda: which option?", "options": ["is appraised", "has a deductible waiver", "is reimbursed", "is uninsurable", "is grandfathered", "has a premium discount"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u025951", "pair_id": "u025951-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025951-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "efc5dc73f82f7cbd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a9", "a6", "a5", "a11", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025951-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yara is indemnified. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 51. Yara is not subrogated. Wanda is subrogated. Wanda is bundled. Yara has no flood coverage. Wanda has no flood coverage. Wanda has a claim frequency of 93. Wanda has a peril factor of 88. Yara has a payout ceiling of 50. Wanda is indemnified. Wanda is not a claimant.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is indemnified and likewise has flood coverage, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 2 While the given policyholder is indemnified and likewise has a claim frequency that exceeds 65, so it is uninsurable. No. 3 While the given policyholder is a claimant and likewise is covered, so it is not reinstated. No. 4 While the given policyholder is indemnified and likewise has a peril factor that exceeds 66 and likewise has flood coverage, so it has a premium discount. No. 5 While the given policyholder is indemnified and likewise has a peril factor not above 66 and likewise is bundled, so it is grandfathered. No. 6 While the given policyholder is indemnified and likewise has roadside assistance and likewise is bundled, so it is appraised. No. 7 While the given policyholder is subrogated, so it is not appraised. No. 8 While the given policyholder is indemnified and likewise is bundled, so it is reimbursed. No. 9 While the given policyholder has a payout ceiling not above 49, so it is not reimbursed. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has roadside assistance. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is bundled. No. 9 wins over No. 8. No. 6 wins over No. 7. Question: Select what holds for Wanda: which option?", "options": ["is appraised", "has a deductible waiver", "is reimbursed", "is uninsurable", "is grandfathered", "has a premium discount"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u025951", "pair_id": "u025951-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025951-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "adca78637dc1952f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a9", "a6", "a5", "a11", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u025995-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar has a field site. Izar is not peer reviewed. Izar has a patent filing. Gemma is not peer reviewed. Gemma is longitudinal. Izar is a pilot study. Izar is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is renewed provided that it has no field site. Section 2: a proposal has industry backing provided that it is theoretical. Section 3: a proposal is shortlisted provided that it is renewed. Section 4: a proposal is not preregistered provided that it is longitudinal. Section 5: a proposal is not exploratory provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 6: a proposal is not resubmitted provided that it is a pilot study. Section 7: a proposal is interdisciplinary provided that it is not exploratory. Section 8: a proposal is endorsed provided that it is not resubmitted. Section 9: a proposal is theoretical provided that it has a patent filing. Section 10: a proposal is not interdisciplinary provided that it is renewed. Section 8 lapses for a proposal if it has a patent filing. Section 8 lapses for a proposal if it has a patent filing. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 7. Question: Which statement fits Izar?", "options": ["is shortlisted", "has industry backing", "is interdisciplinary", "is endorsed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has industry backing", "unit_id": "u025995", "pair_id": "u025995-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025995-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bbe7344ee966c7e2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a10", "a13"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025995-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar has a field site. Izar is not peer reviewed. Izar has no patent filing. Gemma is not peer reviewed. Gemma is longitudinal. Izar is a pilot study. Izar is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is renewed provided that it has no field site. Section 2: a proposal has industry backing provided that it is theoretical. Section 3: a proposal is shortlisted provided that it is renewed. Section 4: a proposal is not preregistered provided that it is longitudinal. Section 5: a proposal is not exploratory provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 6: a proposal is not resubmitted provided that it is a pilot study. Section 7: a proposal is interdisciplinary provided that it is not exploratory. Section 8: a proposal is endorsed provided that it is not resubmitted. Section 9: a proposal is theoretical provided that it has a patent filing. Section 10: a proposal is not interdisciplinary provided that it is renewed. Section 8 lapses for a proposal if it has a patent filing. Section 8 lapses for a proposal if it has a patent filing. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 7. Question: Which statement fits Izar?", "options": ["is shortlisted", "has industry backing", "is interdisciplinary", "is endorsed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u025995", "pair_id": "u025995-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025995-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bafc2583cb2facab", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a10", "a13"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025995-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar has a field site. Izar is not peer reviewed. Izar has a patent filing. Gemma is not peer reviewed. Gemma is longitudinal. Izar is a pilot study. Izar is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has no field site: then it is renewed. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it has industry backing. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is renewed: then it is shortlisted. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is longitudinal: then it is not preregistered. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed: then it is not exploratory. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it is not resubmitted. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal is not exploratory: then it is interdisciplinary. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal is not resubmitted: then it is endorsed. Policy IX. Suppose that proposal has a patent filing: then it is theoretical. Policy X. Suppose that proposal is renewed: then it is not interdisciplinary. Policy VIII is waived if that proposal has a patent filing. Policy VIII is waived if that proposal has a patent filing. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy VII. Question: Which choice is right for Izar?", "options": ["is shortlisted", "has industry backing", "is interdisciplinary", "is endorsed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has industry backing", "unit_id": "u025995", "pair_id": "u025995-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025995-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bbe7344ee966c7e2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a10", "a13"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025995-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar has a field site. Izar is not peer reviewed. Izar has no patent filing. Gemma is not peer reviewed. Gemma is longitudinal. Izar is a pilot study. Izar is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has no field site: then it is renewed. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it has industry backing. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is renewed: then it is shortlisted. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is longitudinal: then it is not preregistered. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed: then it is not exploratory. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it is not resubmitted. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal is not exploratory: then it is interdisciplinary. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal is not resubmitted: then it is endorsed. Policy IX. Suppose that proposal has a patent filing: then it is theoretical. Policy X. Suppose that proposal is renewed: then it is not interdisciplinary. Policy VIII is waived if that proposal has a patent filing. Policy VIII is waived if that proposal has a patent filing. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy VII. Question: Which choice is right for Izar?", "options": ["is shortlisted", "has industry backing", "is interdisciplinary", "is endorsed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u025995", "pair_id": "u025995-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025995-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bafc2583cb2facab", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a10", "a13"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025995-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar has a field site. Izar is not peer reviewed. Izar has a patent filing. Gemma is not peer reviewed. Gemma is longitudinal. Izar is a pilot study. Izar is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has no field site, it then is renewed. #2 Each time a proposal is theoretical, it then has industry backing. #3 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is shortlisted. #4 Each time a proposal is longitudinal, it then is not preregistered. #5 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then is not exploratory. #6 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then is not resubmitted. #7 Each time a proposal is not exploratory, it then is interdisciplinary. #8 Each time a proposal is not resubmitted, it then is endorsed. #9 Each time a proposal has a patent filing, it then is theoretical. #10 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is not interdisciplinary. #8 is set aside if a proposal has a patent filing. #8 is set aside if a proposal has a patent filing. #7 yields to #10. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Izar?", "options": ["is shortlisted", "has industry backing", "is interdisciplinary", "is endorsed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has industry backing", "unit_id": "u025995", "pair_id": "u025995-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025995-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bbe7344ee966c7e2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a10", "a13"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u025995-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar has a field site. Izar is not peer reviewed. Izar has no patent filing. Gemma is not peer reviewed. Gemma is longitudinal. Izar is a pilot study. Izar is not longitudinal.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has no field site, it then is renewed. #2 Each time a proposal is theoretical, it then has industry backing. #3 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is shortlisted. #4 Each time a proposal is longitudinal, it then is not preregistered. #5 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then is not exploratory. #6 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then is not resubmitted. #7 Each time a proposal is not exploratory, it then is interdisciplinary. #8 Each time a proposal is not resubmitted, it then is endorsed. #9 Each time a proposal has a patent filing, it then is theoretical. #10 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is not interdisciplinary. #8 is set aside if a proposal has a patent filing. #8 is set aside if a proposal has a patent filing. #7 yields to #10. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Izar?", "options": ["is shortlisted", "has industry backing", "is interdisciplinary", "is endorsed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is endorsed", "unit_id": "u025995", "pair_id": "u025995-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u025995-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bafc2583cb2facab", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a0", "a10", "a13"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026013-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is registered. Jory has a weight class of 2. Jory is not registered. Ulla is hazardous. Ulla is not registered.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is hazardous, it also is palletized. Clause 2: once any parcel is registered, it also has no locker slot. Clause 3: once any parcel is palletized, it also is weighed. Clause 4: once any parcel is palletized, it also is scanned. Clause 5: once any parcel has a weight class under 52, it also is consolidated. Clause 6: once any parcel is consolidated, it also is not scanned. Clause 7: once any parcel is hazardous, it also is stamped. Question: Does it follow that Jory is scanned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026013", "pair_id": "u026013-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026013-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "28a7f8f376185f39", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026013-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is registered. Jory has a weight class of 2. Jory is not registered. Ulla is hazardous. Ulla is not registered.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is hazardous, it also is palletized. Clause 2: once any parcel is registered, it also has no locker slot. Clause 3: once any parcel is palletized, it also is weighed. Clause 4: once any parcel is palletized, it also is scanned. Clause 5: once any parcel has a weight class of 52 or more, it also is consolidated. Clause 6: once any parcel is consolidated, it also is not scanned. Clause 7: once any parcel is hazardous, it also is stamped. Question: Does it follow that Jory is scanned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026013", "pair_id": "u026013-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026013-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "d4e95adfde212428", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026013-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is registered. Jory has a weight class of 2. Jory is not registered. Ulla is hazardous. Ulla is not registered.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is hazardous, that parcel is palletized. Item B. When the parcel is registered, that parcel has no locker slot. Item C. When the parcel is palletized, that parcel is weighed. Item D. When the parcel is palletized, that parcel is scanned. Item E. When the parcel has a weight class of less than 52, that parcel is consolidated. Item F. When the parcel is consolidated, that parcel is not scanned. Item G. When the parcel is hazardous, that parcel is stamped. Question: Can one infer that Jory is scanned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026013", "pair_id": "u026013-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026013-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "28a7f8f376185f39", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026013-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo is registered. Jory has a weight class of 2. Jory is not registered. Ulla is hazardous. Ulla is not registered.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is hazardous, that parcel is palletized. Item B. When the parcel is registered, that parcel has no locker slot. Item C. When the parcel is palletized, that parcel is weighed. Item D. When the parcel is palletized, that parcel is scanned. Item E. When the parcel has a weight class of no less than 52, that parcel is consolidated. Item F. When the parcel is consolidated, that parcel is not scanned. Item G. When the parcel is hazardous, that parcel is stamped. Question: Can one infer that Jory is scanned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026013", "pair_id": "u026013-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026013-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "d4e95adfde212428", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026015-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is not perishable. Nandor is fragile. Nandor is weighed. Nandor is refrigerated. Nandor is hazardous.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is not hazardous, it also has no courier. Clause 2: once any parcel is not hazardous, it also is not palletized. Clause 3: once any parcel is weighed, it also is prepaid. Clause 4: once any parcel is fragile, it also is delayed. Clause 5: once any parcel is not weighed, it also is palletized. Clause 6: once any parcel is not perishable, it also is damaged. Clause 7: once any parcel is not perishable, it also is not prepaid. Clause 8: once any parcel is not hazardous, it also has a courier. Clause 9: once any parcel is perishable, it also is consolidated. Clause 2 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is fragile. Clause 3 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is fragile. Clause 6 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is refrigerated. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Clause 8 overrides Clause 1. Clause 3 overrides Clause 7. Question: Which of these is true of Nandor?", "options": ["is damaged", "is delayed", "is prepaid", "is consolidated"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is delayed", "unit_id": "u026015", "pair_id": "u026015-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026015-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "02d299a058bf4a15", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a7", "a8", "a5"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u026015-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is not perishable. Nandor is not fragile. Nandor is weighed. Nandor is refrigerated. Nandor is hazardous.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is not hazardous, it also has no courier. Clause 2: once any parcel is not hazardous, it also is not palletized. Clause 3: once any parcel is weighed, it also is prepaid. Clause 4: once any parcel is fragile, it also is delayed. Clause 5: once any parcel is not weighed, it also is palletized. Clause 6: once any parcel is not perishable, it also is damaged. Clause 7: once any parcel is not perishable, it also is not prepaid. Clause 8: once any parcel is not hazardous, it also has a courier. Clause 9: once any parcel is perishable, it also is consolidated. Clause 2 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is fragile. Clause 3 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is fragile. Clause 6 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is refrigerated. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Clause 8 overrides Clause 1. Clause 3 overrides Clause 7. Question: Which of these is true of Nandor?", "options": ["is damaged", "is delayed", "is prepaid", "is consolidated"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prepaid", "unit_id": "u026015", "pair_id": "u026015-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026015-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a3d06d8634ce9111", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a7", "a8", "a5"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u026075-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is throttled. Borealis has a memory allotment of 12. Borealis is sharded. Sierra has a CPU quota of 18. Borealis is containerized. Sierra is not throttled. Borealis has no failover node. Sierra is not backed up. Borealis has a CPU quota of 6. Borealis is not backed up. Borealis has a replica count of 2.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a public endpoint while has a replica count beyond 58 while has a memory allotment beneath 32, thus it has no GPU. Provision 2: when the workload here has a public endpoint while has a replica count at or below 58 while has a memory allotment at or below 67, thus it has a GPU. Provision 3: when the workload here is backed up while has a replica count beneath 89 while is sharded, thus it has a public endpoint. Provision 4: when the workload here has a replica count beneath 22, thus it is virtualized. Provision 5: when the workload here is throttled while has a failover node, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 5 has no effect when the workload here has a replica count beneath 52. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here has a CPU quota at or above 63 while is containerized. Question: Would it be right to say that Borealis has a GPU?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026075", "pair_id": "u026075-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026075-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "afe02629b7c7814b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026075-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is throttled. Borealis has a memory allotment of 12. Borealis is sharded. Sierra has a CPU quota of 18. Borealis is containerized. Sierra is not throttled. Borealis has no failover node. Sierra is not backed up. Borealis has a CPU quota of 6. Borealis is not backed up. Borealis has a replica count of 2.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a public endpoint while has a replica count beyond 58 while has a memory allotment beneath 32, thus it has no GPU. Provision 2: when the workload here has a public endpoint while has a replica count at or below 58 while has a memory allotment at or below 67, thus it has a GPU. Provision 3: when the workload here is backed up while has a replica count beneath 89 while is sharded, thus it has a public endpoint. Provision 4: when the workload here has a replica count at or above 22, thus it is virtualized. Provision 5: when the workload here is throttled while has a failover node, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 5 has no effect when the workload here has a replica count beneath 52. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here has a CPU quota at or above 63 while is containerized. Question: Would it be right to say that Borealis has a GPU?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026075", "pair_id": "u026075-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026075-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d19acadbc2e2dfcf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026075-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is throttled. Borealis has a memory allotment of 12. Borealis is sharded. Sierra has a CPU quota of 18. Borealis is containerized. Sierra is not throttled. Borealis has no failover node. Sierra is not backed up. Borealis has a CPU quota of 6. Borealis is not backed up. Borealis has a replica count of 2.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a public endpoint and further has a replica count in excess of 58 and further has a memory allotment short of 32, it thereby has no GPU. Point B. If said workload has a public endpoint and further has a replica count of maximum 58 and further has a memory allotment of maximum 67, it thereby has a GPU. Point C. If said workload is backed up and further has a replica count short of 89 and further is sharded, it thereby has a public endpoint. Point D. If said workload has a replica count short of 22, it thereby is virtualized. Point E. If said workload is throttled and further has a failover node, it thereby has a dedicated host. Point E is cancelled if said workload has a replica count short of 52. Point A is cancelled if said workload has a CPU quota of minimum 63 and further is containerized. Question: Statement: Borealis has a GPU. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026075", "pair_id": "u026075-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026075-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "afe02629b7c7814b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026075-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is throttled. Borealis has a memory allotment of 12. Borealis is sharded. Sierra has a CPU quota of 18. Borealis is containerized. Sierra is not throttled. Borealis has no failover node. Sierra is not backed up. Borealis has a CPU quota of 6. Borealis is not backed up. Borealis has a replica count of 2.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a public endpoint and further has a replica count in excess of 58 and further has a memory allotment short of 32, it thereby has no GPU. Point B. If said workload has a public endpoint and further has a replica count of maximum 58 and further has a memory allotment of maximum 67, it thereby has a GPU. Point C. If said workload is backed up and further has a replica count short of 89 and further is sharded, it thereby has a public endpoint. Point D. If said workload has a replica count of minimum 22, it thereby is virtualized. Point E. If said workload is throttled and further has a failover node, it thereby has a dedicated host. Point E is cancelled if said workload has a replica count short of 52. Point A is cancelled if said workload has a CPU quota of minimum 63 and further is containerized. Question: Statement: Borealis has a GPU. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026075", "pair_id": "u026075-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026075-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d19acadbc2e2dfcf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026075-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is throttled. Borealis has a memory allotment of 12. Borealis is sharded. Sierra has a CPU quota of 18. Borealis is containerized. Sierra is not throttled. Borealis has no failover node. Sierra is not backed up. Borealis has a CPU quota of 6. Borealis is not backed up. Borealis has a replica count of 2.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a public endpoint and likewise has a replica count that exceeds 58 and likewise has a memory allotment that falls below 32, so it has no GPU. No. 2 While the given workload has a public endpoint and likewise has a replica count not above 58 and likewise has a memory allotment not above 67, so it has a GPU. No. 3 While the given workload is backed up and likewise has a replica count that falls below 89 and likewise is sharded, so it has a public endpoint. No. 4 While the given workload has a replica count that falls below 22, so it is virtualized. No. 5 While the given workload is throttled and likewise has a failover node, so it has a dedicated host. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given workload has a replica count that falls below 52. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload has a CPU quota not below 63 and likewise is containerized. Question: Is the claim \"Borealis has a GPU\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026075", "pair_id": "u026075-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026075-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "afe02629b7c7814b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026075-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is throttled. Borealis has a memory allotment of 12. Borealis is sharded. Sierra has a CPU quota of 18. Borealis is containerized. Sierra is not throttled. Borealis has no failover node. Sierra is not backed up. Borealis has a CPU quota of 6. Borealis is not backed up. Borealis has a replica count of 2.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload has a public endpoint and likewise has a replica count that exceeds 58 and likewise has a memory allotment that falls below 32, so it has no GPU. No. 2 While the given workload has a public endpoint and likewise has a replica count not above 58 and likewise has a memory allotment not above 67, so it has a GPU. No. 3 While the given workload is backed up and likewise has a replica count that falls below 89 and likewise is sharded, so it has a public endpoint. No. 4 While the given workload has a replica count not below 22, so it is virtualized. No. 5 While the given workload is throttled and likewise has a failover node, so it has a dedicated host. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given workload has a replica count that falls below 52. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload has a CPU quota not below 63 and likewise is containerized. Question: Is the claim \"Borealis has a GPU\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026075", "pair_id": "u026075-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026075-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d19acadbc2e2dfcf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026113-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke has a debt ratio of 26. Folke is not garnished. Evren is garnished. Folke is not prequalified. Folke is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is a depositor provided that it has a debt ratio of 31 or higher. Section 2: a borrower has collateral provided that it is not garnished. Section 3: a borrower has no guarantor provided that it is refinanced. Section 4: a borrower is refinanced provided that it is prequalified. Section 5: a borrower is solvent provided that it has a guarantor. Section 6: a borrower has a guarantor provided that it is a depositor. Question: Folke has no guarantor. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026113", "pair_id": "u026113-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026113-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "ce8e1e1923f5c41a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026113-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke has a debt ratio of 26. Folke is not garnished. Evren is garnished. Folke is not prequalified. Folke is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is a depositor provided that it has a debt ratio of 31 or higher. Section 2: a borrower has collateral provided that it is garnished. Section 3: a borrower has no guarantor provided that it is refinanced. Section 4: a borrower is refinanced provided that it is prequalified. Section 5: a borrower is solvent provided that it has a guarantor. Section 6: a borrower has a guarantor provided that it is a depositor. Question: Folke has no guarantor. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026113", "pair_id": "u026113-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026113-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "395ff527d8d8795b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026131-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not a veteran. Mads is not relocating. Mads is probationary. Mads is onboarded. Mads has no mentor. Mads is bonded. Mads has a signing bonus. Mads is seasoned.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is onboarded, then it has a background screening. (2) If a candidate is bonded and is seasoned and is sponsored, then it has a portfolio. (3) If a candidate is probationary and is relocating, then it is not bilingual. (4) If a candidate is bilingual and has a signing bonus and has a mentor, then it has a visa. (5) If a candidate is bilingual and is probationary, then it has no visa. (6) If a candidate is a veteran, then it has no background screening. (7) If a candidate has a portfolio, then it is bilingual. (5) is void if the candidate is a veteran. When (3) and (7) clash, (3) prevails. When (5) and (4) clash, (5) prevails. When (6) and (1) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Mads has no visa?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026131", "pair_id": "u026131-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026131-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "873d07a1d26c5027", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026131-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not a veteran. Mads is not relocating. Mads is probationary. Mads is onboarded. Mads has no mentor. Mads is sponsored. Mads is bonded. Mads has a signing bonus. Mads is seasoned.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is onboarded, then it has a background screening. (2) If a candidate is bonded and is seasoned and is sponsored, then it has a portfolio. (3) If a candidate is probationary and is relocating, then it is not bilingual. (4) If a candidate is bilingual and has a signing bonus and has a mentor, then it has a visa. (5) If a candidate is bilingual and is probationary, then it has no visa. (6) If a candidate is a veteran, then it has no background screening. (7) If a candidate has a portfolio, then it is bilingual. (5) is void if the candidate is a veteran. When (3) and (7) clash, (3) prevails. When (5) and (4) clash, (5) prevails. When (6) and (1) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Mads has no visa?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026131", "pair_id": "u026131-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026131-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a8113eda193a1d92", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026131-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not a veteran. Mads is not relocating. Mads is probationary. Mads is onboarded. Mads has no mentor. Mads is bonded. Mads has a signing bonus. Mads is seasoned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is onboarded, it also has a background screening. Clause 2: once any candidate is bonded and also is seasoned and also is sponsored, it also has a portfolio. Clause 3: once any candidate is probationary and also is relocating, it also is not bilingual. Clause 4: once any candidate is bilingual and also has a signing bonus and also has a mentor, it also has a visa. Clause 5: once any candidate is bilingual and also is probationary, it also has no visa. Clause 6: once any candidate is a veteran, it also has no background screening. Clause 7: once any candidate has a portfolio, it also is bilingual. Clause 5 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is a veteran. Clause 3 overrides Clause 7. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Clause 6 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Mads has no visa?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026131", "pair_id": "u026131-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026131-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "873d07a1d26c5027", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026131-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not a veteran. Mads is not relocating. Mads is probationary. Mads is onboarded. Mads has no mentor. Mads is sponsored. Mads is bonded. Mads has a signing bonus. Mads is seasoned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is onboarded, it also has a background screening. Clause 2: once any candidate is bonded and also is seasoned and also is sponsored, it also has a portfolio. Clause 3: once any candidate is probationary and also is relocating, it also is not bilingual. Clause 4: once any candidate is bilingual and also has a signing bonus and also has a mentor, it also has a visa. Clause 5: once any candidate is bilingual and also is probationary, it also has no visa. Clause 6: once any candidate is a veteran, it also has no background screening. Clause 7: once any candidate has a portfolio, it also is bilingual. Clause 5 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is a veteran. Clause 3 overrides Clause 7. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Clause 6 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Mads has no visa?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026131", "pair_id": "u026131-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026131-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a8113eda193a1d92", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026131-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not a veteran. Mads is not relocating. Mads is probationary. Mads is onboarded. Mads has no mentor. Mads is bonded. Mads has a signing bonus. Mads is seasoned.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is onboarded, that candidate has a background screening. Item B. When the candidate is bonded, and is seasoned, and is sponsored, that candidate has a portfolio. Item C. When the candidate is probationary, and is relocating, that candidate is not bilingual. Item D. When the candidate is bilingual, and has a signing bonus, and has a mentor, that candidate has a visa. Item E. When the candidate is bilingual, and is probationary, that candidate has no visa. Item F. When the candidate is a veteran, that candidate has no background screening. Item G. When the candidate has a portfolio, that candidate is bilingual. Item E is suspended when the candidate is a veteran. Item C outranks Item G. Item E outranks Item D. Item F outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Mads has no visa?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026131", "pair_id": "u026131-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026131-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "873d07a1d26c5027", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026131-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not a veteran. Mads is not relocating. Mads is probationary. Mads is onboarded. Mads has no mentor. Mads is sponsored. Mads is bonded. Mads has a signing bonus. Mads is seasoned.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is onboarded, that candidate has a background screening. Item B. When the candidate is bonded, and is seasoned, and is sponsored, that candidate has a portfolio. Item C. When the candidate is probationary, and is relocating, that candidate is not bilingual. Item D. When the candidate is bilingual, and has a signing bonus, and has a mentor, that candidate has a visa. Item E. When the candidate is bilingual, and is probationary, that candidate has no visa. Item F. When the candidate is a veteran, that candidate has no background screening. Item G. When the candidate has a portfolio, that candidate is bilingual. Item E is suspended when the candidate is a veteran. Item C outranks Item G. Item E outranks Item D. Item F outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Mads has no visa?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026131", "pair_id": "u026131-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026131-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a8113eda193a1d92", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026137-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not bonded. Lotte is not sponsored. Lotte is not relocating. Mads is a veteran. Mads is sponsored. Lotte is not bonded.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is eligible. Provision 2: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is not eligible. Provision 3: when the candidate here is licensed, thus it is headhunted. Provision 4: when the candidate here is bonded, thus it is licensed. Provision 5: when the candidate here is relocating, thus it is onboarded. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here is sponsored. Provision 5 has no effect when the candidate here is a veteran. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is certified. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is not sponsored. Question: Would it be right to say that Lotte is eligible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026137", "pair_id": "u026137-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026137-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a00d1a06d171ebaf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026137-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not bonded. Lotte is not sponsored. Lotte is not relocating. Mads is a veteran. Mads is sponsored. Lotte is bonded.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is eligible. Provision 2: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is not eligible. Provision 3: when the candidate here is licensed, thus it is headhunted. Provision 4: when the candidate here is bonded, thus it is licensed. Provision 5: when the candidate here is relocating, thus it is onboarded. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here is sponsored. Provision 5 has no effect when the candidate here is a veteran. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is certified. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is not sponsored. Question: Would it be right to say that Lotte is eligible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026137", "pair_id": "u026137-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026137-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "543de7755bdf6e5e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026152-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has no beneficiary. Bruno is uninsurable. Xaver is not uninsurable. Bruno is not bundled. Xaver is bundled. Xaver is reimbursed. Bruno has a rider. Xaver has a beneficiary. Xaver is covered. Bruno is retired.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is not bundled, thus it is disputed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it has flood coverage. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary, thus it has no flood coverage. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is appraised. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it is a smoker. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it is not disputed. Provision 7: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary, thus it has no roadside assistance. Provision 8: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it has roadside assistance. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is not appraised. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here has a rider. Provision 2 has no effect when the policyholder here is reimbursed. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here is reimbursed. Provision 9 has no effect when the policyholder here is covered. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here is uninsurable. Provision 4 has no effect when the policyholder here has a rider. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Xaver is appraised?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026152", "pair_id": "u026152-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026152-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4c929467ed6e2d71", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026152-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has no beneficiary. Bruno is uninsurable. Xaver is not uninsurable. Bruno is not bundled. Xaver is bundled. Xaver is reimbursed. Bruno has a rider. Xaver has a beneficiary. Xaver is covered. Bruno is retired.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it is disputed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it has flood coverage. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary, thus it has no flood coverage. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is appraised. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it is a smoker. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it is not disputed. Provision 7: when the policyholder here has a beneficiary, thus it has no roadside assistance. Provision 8: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it has roadside assistance. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is not appraised. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here has a rider. Provision 2 has no effect when the policyholder here is reimbursed. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here is reimbursed. Provision 9 has no effect when the policyholder here is covered. Provision 3 has no effect when the policyholder here is uninsurable. Provision 4 has no effect when the policyholder here has a rider. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Xaver is appraised?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026152", "pair_id": "u026152-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026152-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c6d659cba836bd91", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026152-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has no beneficiary. Bruno is uninsurable. Xaver is not uninsurable. Bruno is not bundled. Xaver is bundled. Xaver is reimbursed. Bruno has a rider. Xaver has a beneficiary. Xaver is covered. Bruno is retired.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is not bundled, so it is disputed. No. 2 While the given policyholder is uninsurable, so it has flood coverage. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a beneficiary, so it has no flood coverage. No. 4 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it is appraised. No. 5 While the given policyholder is bundled, so it is a smoker. No. 6 While the given policyholder is retired, so it is not disputed. No. 7 While the given policyholder has a beneficiary, so it has no roadside assistance. No. 8 While the given policyholder has flood coverage, so it has roadside assistance. No. 9 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it is not appraised. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a rider. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is reimbursed. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is reimbursed. No. 9 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is covered. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is uninsurable. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a rider. No. 9 wins over No. 4. No. 8 wins over No. 7. No. 1 wins over No. 6. No. 3 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Xaver is appraised\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026152", "pair_id": "u026152-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026152-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4c929467ed6e2d71", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026152-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has no beneficiary. Bruno is uninsurable. Xaver is not uninsurable. Bruno is not bundled. Xaver is bundled. Xaver is reimbursed. Bruno has a rider. Xaver has a beneficiary. Xaver is covered. Bruno is retired.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is bundled, so it is disputed. No. 2 While the given policyholder is uninsurable, so it has flood coverage. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a beneficiary, so it has no flood coverage. No. 4 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it is appraised. No. 5 While the given policyholder is bundled, so it is a smoker. No. 6 While the given policyholder is retired, so it is not disputed. No. 7 While the given policyholder has a beneficiary, so it has no roadside assistance. No. 8 While the given policyholder has flood coverage, so it has roadside assistance. No. 9 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it is not appraised. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a rider. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is reimbursed. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is reimbursed. No. 9 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is covered. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is uninsurable. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a rider. No. 9 wins over No. 4. No. 8 wins over No. 7. No. 1 wins over No. 6. No. 3 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Xaver is appraised\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026152", "pair_id": "u026152-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026152-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c6d659cba836bd91", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026170-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is refrigerated. Jory is hazardous. Liesel is not prepaid. Mirela is not palletized. Liesel is weighed. Liesel is tracked. Jory is not weighed. Liesel is scanned. Liesel is not palletized. Liesel is hazardous. Ulla is not prepaid. Jory is scanned. Ulla is not scanned. Mirela is not hazardous. Jory is palletized. Jory has no locker slot. Liesel has a locker slot. Mirela is scanned. Ulla is not tracked. Liesel is perishable. Ulla is hazardous. Mirela is not weighed. Jory is not prepaid.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby is sealed. Point B. If said parcel is not weighed, it thereby is not sealed. Point C. If said parcel is oversized and further is prepaid and further is weighed, it thereby is not undeliverable. Point D. If said parcel has a locker slot and further is prepaid, it thereby is not oversized. Point E. If said parcel is consolidated and further is scanned and further is hazardous, it thereby is oversized. Point F. If said parcel is oversized and further has a locker slot and further is tracked, it thereby is undeliverable. Point G. If said parcel is perishable and further is scanned, it thereby is consolidated. Point H. If said parcel is perishable, it thereby is not consolidated. Point F is cancelled if said parcel is palletized and further is perishable. Point A is cancelled if said parcel is weighed. Point C supersedes Point F. Point G supersedes Point H. Point B supersedes Point A. Point E supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Liesel is not undeliverable. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026170", "pair_id": "u026170-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026170-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a2a9010a48be9c36", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u026170-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is refrigerated. Jory is hazardous. Liesel is not prepaid. Mirela is not palletized. Liesel is weighed. Liesel is tracked. Jory is not weighed. Liesel is scanned. Liesel is not palletized. Liesel is hazardous. Ulla is not prepaid. Jory is scanned. Ulla is not scanned. Mirela is not hazardous. Jory is palletized. Jory has no locker slot. Liesel has a locker slot. Mirela is scanned. Ulla is not tracked. Liesel is perishable. Ulla is hazardous. Mirela is not weighed. Jory is not prepaid.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby is sealed. Point B. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby is not sealed. Point C. If said parcel is oversized and further is prepaid and further is weighed, it thereby is not undeliverable. Point D. If said parcel has a locker slot and further is prepaid, it thereby is not oversized. Point E. If said parcel is consolidated and further is scanned and further is hazardous, it thereby is oversized. Point F. If said parcel is oversized and further has a locker slot and further is tracked, it thereby is undeliverable. Point G. If said parcel is perishable and further is scanned, it thereby is consolidated. Point H. If said parcel is perishable, it thereby is not consolidated. Point F is cancelled if said parcel is palletized and further is perishable. Point A is cancelled if said parcel is weighed. Point C supersedes Point F. Point G supersedes Point H. Point B supersedes Point A. Point E supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Liesel is not undeliverable. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026170", "pair_id": "u026170-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026170-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "06f337ee68319f7c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u026181-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has a postdoc. Gemma has a team size of 98. Gemma is not a pilot study. Gemma is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is renewed, thus it is interdisciplinary. Provision 2: when the proposal here is resubmitted, thus it is collaborative. Provision 3: when the proposal here is exploratory, thus it is budgeted. Provision 4: when the proposal here has a field site, thus it has seed funding. Provision 5: when the proposal here is cofunded, thus it has industry backing. Provision 6: when the proposal here is shortlisted, thus it has a patent filing. Provision 7: when the proposal here has a team size at or below 37, thus it is renewed. Provision 8: when the proposal here is cofunded, thus it is resubmitted. Provision 9: when the proposal here is a pilot study, thus it is translational. Provision 10: when the proposal here has a team size beyond 37, thus it is exploratory. Provision 11: when the proposal here has a postdoc, thus it is peer reviewed. Provision 12: when the proposal here is translational, thus it is embargoed. Provision 13: when the proposal here is peer reviewed, thus it has a field site. Provision 12 has no effect when the proposal here has a postdoc. Provision 3 has no effect when the proposal here has a postdoc. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here is cofunded. Question: Which one describes Gemma?", "options": ["has a field site", "is embargoed", "is budgeted", "is collaborative", "is interdisciplinary"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a field site", "unit_id": "u026181", "pair_id": "u026181-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026181-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ca49de9eea1a76e4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a0", "a15", "a9", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026181-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has no postdoc. Gemma has a team size of 98. Gemma is not a pilot study. Gemma is not shortlisted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is renewed, thus it is interdisciplinary. Provision 2: when the proposal here is resubmitted, thus it is collaborative. Provision 3: when the proposal here is exploratory, thus it is budgeted. Provision 4: when the proposal here has a field site, thus it has seed funding. Provision 5: when the proposal here is cofunded, thus it has industry backing. Provision 6: when the proposal here is shortlisted, thus it has a patent filing. Provision 7: when the proposal here has a team size at or below 37, thus it is renewed. Provision 8: when the proposal here is cofunded, thus it is resubmitted. Provision 9: when the proposal here is a pilot study, thus it is translational. Provision 10: when the proposal here has a team size beyond 37, thus it is exploratory. Provision 11: when the proposal here has a postdoc, thus it is peer reviewed. Provision 12: when the proposal here is translational, thus it is embargoed. Provision 13: when the proposal here is peer reviewed, thus it has a field site. Provision 12 has no effect when the proposal here has a postdoc. Provision 3 has no effect when the proposal here has a postdoc. Provision 4 has no effect when the proposal here is cofunded. Question: Which one describes Gemma?", "options": ["has a field site", "is embargoed", "is budgeted", "is collaborative", "is interdisciplinary"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is budgeted", "unit_id": "u026181", "pair_id": "u026181-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026181-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "97f4728c31495a09", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a0", "a15", "a9", "a4"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026245-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not bedridden. Xenia is triaged. Xenia is diabetic. Xenia is pregnant. Xenia is fasting.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has no pacemaker provided that it has no interpreter. Section 2: a patient is sedated provided that it is not triaged. Section 3: a patient has no chaperone provided that it is not pregnant. Section 4: a patient has no interpreter provided that it is discharged. Section 5: a patient has a pacemaker provided that it has no interpreter. Section 6: a patient is discharged provided that it is fasting. Section 7: a patient is anemic provided that it is diabetic. Section 1 lapses for a patient if it is not bedridden. Section 7 lapses for a patient if it is fasting. Section 1 lapses for a patient if it is fasting. Section 3 lapses for a patient if it is fasting. Section 5 lapses for a patient if it is bedridden. Question: Xenia has a pacemaker. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026245", "pair_id": "u026245-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026245-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "daba9be5716d0abb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u026245-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not bedridden. Xenia is triaged. Xenia is diabetic. Xenia is pregnant. Xenia is fasting.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has no pacemaker provided that it has no interpreter. Section 2: a patient is sedated provided that it is not triaged. Section 3: a patient has no chaperone provided that it is not pregnant. Section 4: a patient has no interpreter provided that it is discharged. Section 5: a patient has a pacemaker provided that it has no interpreter. Section 6: a patient is discharged provided that it is not fasting. Section 7: a patient is anemic provided that it is diabetic. Section 1 lapses for a patient if it is not bedridden. Section 7 lapses for a patient if it is fasting. Section 1 lapses for a patient if it is fasting. Section 3 lapses for a patient if it is fasting. Section 5 lapses for a patient if it is bedridden. Question: Xenia has a pacemaker. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026245", "pair_id": "u026245-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026245-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2881200d19483873", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u026245-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not bedridden. Xenia is triaged. Xenia is diabetic. Xenia is pregnant. Xenia is fasting.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has no interpreter: then it has no pacemaker. Policy II. Suppose that patient is not triaged: then it is sedated. Policy III. Suppose that patient is not pregnant: then it has no chaperone. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is discharged: then it has no interpreter. Policy V. Suppose that patient has no interpreter: then it has a pacemaker. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is fasting: then it is discharged. Policy VII. Suppose that patient is diabetic: then it is anemic. Policy I is waived if that patient is not bedridden. Policy VII is waived if that patient is fasting. Policy I is waived if that patient is fasting. Policy III is waived if that patient is fasting. Policy V is waived if that patient is bedridden. Question: Is it so that Xenia has a pacemaker?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026245", "pair_id": "u026245-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026245-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "daba9be5716d0abb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u026245-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not bedridden. Xenia is triaged. Xenia is diabetic. Xenia is pregnant. Xenia is fasting.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has no interpreter: then it has no pacemaker. Policy II. Suppose that patient is not triaged: then it is sedated. Policy III. Suppose that patient is not pregnant: then it has no chaperone. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is discharged: then it has no interpreter. Policy V. Suppose that patient has no interpreter: then it has a pacemaker. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is not fasting: then it is discharged. Policy VII. Suppose that patient is diabetic: then it is anemic. Policy I is waived if that patient is not bedridden. Policy VII is waived if that patient is fasting. Policy I is waived if that patient is fasting. Policy III is waived if that patient is fasting. Policy V is waived if that patient is bedridden. Question: Is it so that Xenia has a pacemaker?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026245", "pair_id": "u026245-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026245-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2881200d19483873", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u026245-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not bedridden. Xenia is triaged. Xenia is diabetic. Xenia is pregnant. Xenia is fasting.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has no interpreter, it then has no pacemaker. #2 Each time a patient is not triaged, it then is sedated. #3 Each time a patient is not pregnant, it then has no chaperone. #4 Each time a patient is discharged, it then has no interpreter. #5 Each time a patient has no interpreter, it then has a pacemaker. #6 Each time a patient is fasting, it then is discharged. #7 Each time a patient is diabetic, it then is anemic. #1 is set aside if a patient is not bedridden. #7 is set aside if a patient is fasting. #1 is set aside if a patient is fasting. #3 is set aside if a patient is fasting. #5 is set aside if a patient is bedridden. Question: Do the terms above show that Xenia has a pacemaker?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026245", "pair_id": "u026245-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026245-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "daba9be5716d0abb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u026245-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not bedridden. Xenia is triaged. Xenia is diabetic. Xenia is pregnant. Xenia is fasting.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has no interpreter, it then has no pacemaker. #2 Each time a patient is not triaged, it then is sedated. #3 Each time a patient is not pregnant, it then has no chaperone. #4 Each time a patient is discharged, it then has no interpreter. #5 Each time a patient has no interpreter, it then has a pacemaker. #6 Each time a patient is not fasting, it then is discharged. #7 Each time a patient is diabetic, it then is anemic. #1 is set aside if a patient is not bedridden. #7 is set aside if a patient is fasting. #1 is set aside if a patient is fasting. #3 is set aside if a patient is fasting. #5 is set aside if a patient is bedridden. Question: Do the terms above show that Xenia has a pacemaker?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026245", "pair_id": "u026245-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026245-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2881200d19483873", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u026250-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid has a debt ratio of 74. Hamid has no lien. Ingrid is not creditworthy. Ingrid has a lien. Anouk is creditworthy. Hamid has a debt ratio of 91. Anouk has a lien.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is not creditworthy, it thereby has an escrow account. Point B. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is overdrawn. Point C. If said borrower has a debt ratio short of 73, it thereby has a mortgage. Point D. If said borrower has no lien, it thereby is a homeowner. Question: Which choice is true for Ingrid?", "options": ["has a mortgage", "is overdrawn", "has an escrow account"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has an escrow account", "unit_id": "u026250", "pair_id": "u026250-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026250-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "12d472066766c086", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a1", "a2"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u026250-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid has a debt ratio of 74. Hamid has no lien. Ingrid is not creditworthy. Ingrid has no lien. Anouk is creditworthy. Hamid has a debt ratio of 91. Anouk has a lien.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is not creditworthy, it thereby has an escrow account. Point B. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is overdrawn. Point C. If said borrower has a debt ratio short of 73, it thereby has a mortgage. Point D. If said borrower has no lien, it thereby is a homeowner. Question: Which choice is true for Ingrid?", "options": ["has a mortgage", "is overdrawn", "has an escrow account"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has an escrow account", "unit_id": "u026250", "pair_id": "u026250-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026250-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "082ea676f330a5a0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a1", "a2"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u026253-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not headhunted. Lotte is seasoned. Jasna is headhunted. Petra has no diploma. Teodor is seasoned. Petra is seasoned. Lotte has no diploma. Jasna has a diploma.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is seasoned, it also is not onboarded. Clause 2: once any candidate has a diploma, it also is not a graduate. Clause 3: once any candidate is headhunted, it also is onboarded. Clause 4: once any candidate is headhunted, it also is not a veteran. Clause 5: once any candidate is headhunted, it also is a graduate. Clause 6: once any candidate is onboarded, it also is a veteran. Clause 4 overrides Clause 6. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Jasna is not onboarded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026253", "pair_id": "u026253-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026253-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "3a131aa929aeb6c6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026253-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not headhunted. Lotte is seasoned. Jasna is headhunted. Petra has no diploma. Teodor is seasoned. Petra is seasoned. Lotte has no diploma. Jasna has no diploma.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is seasoned, it also is not onboarded. Clause 2: once any candidate has a diploma, it also is not a graduate. Clause 3: once any candidate is headhunted, it also is onboarded. Clause 4: once any candidate is headhunted, it also is not a veteran. Clause 5: once any candidate is headhunted, it also is a graduate. Clause 6: once any candidate is onboarded, it also is a veteran. Clause 4 overrides Clause 6. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Clause 1 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Jasna is not onboarded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026253", "pair_id": "u026253-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026253-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "c3983961d1465614", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026253-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not headhunted. Lotte is seasoned. Jasna is headhunted. Petra has no diploma. Teodor is seasoned. Petra is seasoned. Lotte has no diploma. Jasna has a diploma.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is seasoned, that candidate is not onboarded. Item B. When the candidate has a diploma, that candidate is not a graduate. Item C. When the candidate is headhunted, that candidate is onboarded. Item D. When the candidate is headhunted, that candidate is not a veteran. Item E. When the candidate is headhunted, that candidate is a graduate. Item F. When the candidate is onboarded, that candidate is a veteran. Item D outranks Item F. Item B outranks Item E. Item A outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Jasna is not onboarded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026253", "pair_id": "u026253-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026253-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "3a131aa929aeb6c6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026253-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not headhunted. Lotte is seasoned. Jasna is headhunted. Petra has no diploma. Teodor is seasoned. Petra is seasoned. Lotte has no diploma. Jasna has no diploma.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is seasoned, that candidate is not onboarded. Item B. When the candidate has a diploma, that candidate is not a graduate. Item C. When the candidate is headhunted, that candidate is onboarded. Item D. When the candidate is headhunted, that candidate is not a veteran. Item E. When the candidate is headhunted, that candidate is a graduate. Item F. When the candidate is onboarded, that candidate is a veteran. Item D outranks Item F. Item B outranks Item E. Item A outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Jasna is not onboarded?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026253", "pair_id": "u026253-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026253-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "c3983961d1465614", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026287-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta has a mortgage. Greta is a homeowner. Greta has a debt ratio of 99. Greta is garnished. Greta is indebted. Greta has a credit rating of 47.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is not garnished, then it is not bankrupt. (2) If a borrower has no mortgage, then it is delinquent. (3) If a borrower is refinanced, then it has a cosigner. (4) If a borrower has a cosigner, then it is not foreclosed. (5) If a borrower has a cosigner, then it is foreclosed. (6) If a borrower is employed, then it is not delinquent. (7) If a borrower is not a homeowner, then it is solvent. (8) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it is refinanced. (1) is void if the borrower has a debt ratio above 57. (7) is void if the borrower has a debt ratio above 17. (4) is void if the borrower has a credit rating of at most 46. (5) is void if the borrower is indebted. (2) is void if the borrower is garnished. (5) is void if the borrower has a credit rating above 87. When (2) and (6) clash, (2) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Greta is foreclosed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026287", "pair_id": "u026287-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026287-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3fbfb41518a1cfa4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026287-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta has a mortgage. Greta is a homeowner. Greta has a debt ratio of 99. Greta is garnished. Greta is indebted. Greta has a credit rating of 47.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is not garnished, then it is not bankrupt. (2) If a borrower has no mortgage, then it is delinquent. (3) If a borrower is refinanced, then it has a cosigner. (4) If a borrower has a cosigner, then it is not foreclosed. (5) If a borrower has a cosigner, then it is foreclosed. (6) If a borrower is employed, then it is not delinquent. (7) If a borrower is not a homeowner, then it is solvent. (8) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it is refinanced. (1) is void if the borrower has a debt ratio above 57. (7) is void if the borrower has a debt ratio above 17. (4) is void if the borrower has a credit rating of at most 87. (5) is void if the borrower is indebted. (2) is void if the borrower is garnished. (5) is void if the borrower has a credit rating above 87. When (2) and (6) clash, (2) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Greta is foreclosed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026287", "pair_id": "u026287-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026287-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "56adcf1ae409e29c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026315-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is minified. Galena is not localized. Feldspar is localized. Schist is not minified.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is reverted, then it is not obsolete. (2) If a build has a migration script, then it is obsolete. (3) If a build is not localized, then it is documented. (4) If a build is localized, then it is versioned. (5) If a build is minified, then it is reverted. (6) If a build is benchmarked, then it has a migration script. Question: Is it true that Galena is obsolete?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026315", "pair_id": "u026315-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026315-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "d693acf6d3cd5027", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026315-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is minified. Galena is not localized. Feldspar is localized. Schist is not minified.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is reverted, then it is not obsolete. (2) If a build has a migration script, then it is obsolete. (3) If a build is localized, then it is documented. (4) If a build is localized, then it is versioned. (5) If a build is minified, then it is reverted. (6) If a build is benchmarked, then it has a migration script. Question: Is it true that Galena is obsolete?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026315", "pair_id": "u026315-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026315-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "b53ebf1da48885ec", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026317-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra has an aptitude quotient of 0. Petra is seasoned. Petra is interviewed. Petra is licensed. Petra is not onboarded.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is not probationary, then it has a diploma. (2) If a candidate has a signing bonus, then it is a veteran. (3) If a candidate is sponsored, then it has a portfolio. (4) If a candidate is licensed, then it is bilingual. (5) If a candidate is not interviewed, then it has a mentor. (6) If a candidate is bilingual, then it is sponsored. (7) If a candidate is bilingual, then it has no diploma. (8) If a candidate is seasoned, then it is relocating. (9) If a candidate is fingerprinted, then it has a signing bonus. (10) If a candidate is relocating, then it is not probationary. (11) If a candidate is not onboarded, then it is fingerprinted. (12) If a candidate has an aptitude quotient above 56, then it is not bilingual. (13) If a candidate is licensed, then it is not a veteran. When (7) and (1) clash, (7) prevails. When (4) and (12) clash, (4) prevails. When (13) and (2) clash, (13) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Petra?", "options": ["has a portfolio", "has a diploma", "is a veteran"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a portfolio", "unit_id": "u026317", "pair_id": "u026317-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026317-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "30ac768f04b78ebc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a14", "a13"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026317-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra has an aptitude quotient of 0. Petra is seasoned. Petra is interviewed. Petra is licensed. Petra is not onboarded.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is not probationary, then it has a diploma. (2) If a candidate has a signing bonus, then it is a veteran. (3) If a candidate is sponsored, then it has a portfolio. (4) If a candidate is not licensed, then it is bilingual. (5) If a candidate is not interviewed, then it has a mentor. (6) If a candidate is bilingual, then it is sponsored. (7) If a candidate is bilingual, then it has no diploma. (8) If a candidate is seasoned, then it is relocating. (9) If a candidate is fingerprinted, then it has a signing bonus. (10) If a candidate is relocating, then it is not probationary. (11) If a candidate is not onboarded, then it is fingerprinted. (12) If a candidate has an aptitude quotient above 56, then it is not bilingual. (13) If a candidate is licensed, then it is not a veteran. When (7) and (1) clash, (7) prevails. When (4) and (12) clash, (4) prevails. When (13) and (2) clash, (13) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Petra?", "options": ["has a portfolio", "has a diploma", "is a veteran"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a diploma", "unit_id": "u026317", "pair_id": "u026317-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026317-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "33ddca2806e808dc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a14", "a13"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026317-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra has an aptitude quotient of 0. Petra is seasoned. Petra is interviewed. Petra is licensed. Petra is not onboarded.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is not probationary, it also has a diploma. Clause 2: once any candidate has a signing bonus, it also is a veteran. Clause 3: once any candidate is sponsored, it also has a portfolio. Clause 4: once any candidate is licensed, it also is bilingual. Clause 5: once any candidate is not interviewed, it also has a mentor. Clause 6: once any candidate is bilingual, it also is sponsored. Clause 7: once any candidate is bilingual, it also has no diploma. Clause 8: once any candidate is seasoned, it also is relocating. Clause 9: once any candidate is fingerprinted, it also has a signing bonus. Clause 10: once any candidate is relocating, it also is not probationary. Clause 11: once any candidate is not onboarded, it also is fingerprinted. Clause 12: once any candidate has an aptitude quotient over 56, it also is not bilingual. Clause 13: once any candidate is licensed, it also is not a veteran. Clause 7 overrides Clause 1. Clause 4 overrides Clause 12. Clause 13 overrides Clause 2. Question: Which of these is true of Petra?", "options": ["has a portfolio", "has a diploma", "is a veteran"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a portfolio", "unit_id": "u026317", "pair_id": "u026317-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026317-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "30ac768f04b78ebc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a14", "a13"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026317-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra has an aptitude quotient of 0. Petra is seasoned. Petra is interviewed. Petra is licensed. Petra is not onboarded.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is not probationary, it also has a diploma. Clause 2: once any candidate has a signing bonus, it also is a veteran. Clause 3: once any candidate is sponsored, it also has a portfolio. Clause 4: once any candidate is not licensed, it also is bilingual. Clause 5: once any candidate is not interviewed, it also has a mentor. Clause 6: once any candidate is bilingual, it also is sponsored. Clause 7: once any candidate is bilingual, it also has no diploma. Clause 8: once any candidate is seasoned, it also is relocating. Clause 9: once any candidate is fingerprinted, it also has a signing bonus. Clause 10: once any candidate is relocating, it also is not probationary. Clause 11: once any candidate is not onboarded, it also is fingerprinted. Clause 12: once any candidate has an aptitude quotient over 56, it also is not bilingual. Clause 13: once any candidate is licensed, it also is not a veteran. Clause 7 overrides Clause 1. Clause 4 overrides Clause 12. Clause 13 overrides Clause 2. Question: Which of these is true of Petra?", "options": ["has a portfolio", "has a diploma", "is a veteran"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a diploma", "unit_id": "u026317", "pair_id": "u026317-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026317-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "33ddca2806e808dc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a14", "a13"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026317-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra has an aptitude quotient of 0. Petra is seasoned. Petra is interviewed. Petra is licensed. Petra is not onboarded.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is not probationary, that candidate has a diploma. Item B. When the candidate has a signing bonus, that candidate is a veteran. Item C. When the candidate is sponsored, that candidate has a portfolio. Item D. When the candidate is licensed, that candidate is bilingual. Item E. When the candidate is not interviewed, that candidate has a mentor. Item F. When the candidate is bilingual, that candidate is sponsored. Item G. When the candidate is bilingual, that candidate has no diploma. Item H. When the candidate is seasoned, that candidate is relocating. Item I. When the candidate is fingerprinted, that candidate has a signing bonus. Item J. When the candidate is relocating, that candidate is not probationary. Item K. When the candidate is not onboarded, that candidate is fingerprinted. Item L. When the candidate has an aptitude quotient of more than 56, that candidate is not bilingual. Item M. When the candidate is licensed, that candidate is not a veteran. Item G outranks Item A. Item D outranks Item L. Item M outranks Item B. Question: What applies to Petra?", "options": ["has a portfolio", "has a diploma", "is a veteran"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a portfolio", "unit_id": "u026317", "pair_id": "u026317-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026317-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "30ac768f04b78ebc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a14", "a13"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026317-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra has an aptitude quotient of 0. Petra is seasoned. Petra is interviewed. Petra is licensed. Petra is not onboarded.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is not probationary, that candidate has a diploma. Item B. When the candidate has a signing bonus, that candidate is a veteran. Item C. When the candidate is sponsored, that candidate has a portfolio. Item D. When the candidate is not licensed, that candidate is bilingual. Item E. When the candidate is not interviewed, that candidate has a mentor. Item F. When the candidate is bilingual, that candidate is sponsored. Item G. When the candidate is bilingual, that candidate has no diploma. Item H. When the candidate is seasoned, that candidate is relocating. Item I. When the candidate is fingerprinted, that candidate has a signing bonus. Item J. When the candidate is relocating, that candidate is not probationary. Item K. When the candidate is not onboarded, that candidate is fingerprinted. Item L. When the candidate has an aptitude quotient of more than 56, that candidate is not bilingual. Item M. When the candidate is licensed, that candidate is not a veteran. Item G outranks Item A. Item D outranks Item L. Item M outranks Item B. Question: What applies to Petra?", "options": ["has a portfolio", "has a diploma", "is a veteran"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a diploma", "unit_id": "u026317", "pair_id": "u026317-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026317-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "33ddca2806e808dc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a12", "a14", "a13"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026414-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is not delayed. Quentin is rerouted. Quentin is not misrouted. Quentin is registered. Quentin is fragile. Quentin is damaged. Quentin is consolidated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is registered, it thereby is not sealed. Point B. If said parcel is rerouted, it thereby is not scanned. Point C. If said parcel is damaged and further is misrouted, it thereby has a barcode. Point D. If said parcel is damaged and further is registered, it thereby is stamped. Point E. If said parcel is damaged and further is undeliverable, it thereby is hazardous. Point F. If said parcel is damaged and further is rerouted and further is consolidated, it thereby is sealed. Point G. If said parcel is fragile and further is delayed and further is registered, it thereby is labeled. Point H. If said parcel is undeliverable, it thereby has no barcode. Point H supersedes Point C. Point A supersedes Point F. Question: Which choice is true for Quentin?", "options": ["is stamped", "is hazardous", "has a barcode", "is sealed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is stamped", "unit_id": "u026414", "pair_id": "u026414-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026414-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fd7ed531d9f1e390", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a11", "a10", "a13"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026414-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is not delayed. Quentin is rerouted. Quentin is not misrouted. Quentin is not registered. Quentin is fragile. Quentin is damaged. Quentin is consolidated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is registered, it thereby is not sealed. Point B. If said parcel is rerouted, it thereby is not scanned. Point C. If said parcel is damaged and further is misrouted, it thereby has a barcode. Point D. If said parcel is damaged and further is registered, it thereby is stamped. Point E. If said parcel is damaged and further is undeliverable, it thereby is hazardous. Point F. If said parcel is damaged and further is rerouted and further is consolidated, it thereby is sealed. Point G. If said parcel is fragile and further is delayed and further is registered, it thereby is labeled. Point H. If said parcel is undeliverable, it thereby has no barcode. Point H supersedes Point C. Point A supersedes Point F. Question: Which choice is true for Quentin?", "options": ["is stamped", "is hazardous", "has a barcode", "is sealed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sealed", "unit_id": "u026414", "pair_id": "u026414-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026414-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a575a075eab705c0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a11", "a10", "a13"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026414-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is not delayed. Quentin is rerouted. Quentin is not misrouted. Quentin is registered. Quentin is fragile. Quentin is damaged. Quentin is consolidated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is registered, so it is not sealed. No. 2 While the given parcel is rerouted, so it is not scanned. No. 3 While the given parcel is damaged and likewise is misrouted, so it has a barcode. No. 4 While the given parcel is damaged and likewise is registered, so it is stamped. No. 5 While the given parcel is damaged and likewise is undeliverable, so it is hazardous. No. 6 While the given parcel is damaged and likewise is rerouted and likewise is consolidated, so it is sealed. No. 7 While the given parcel is fragile and likewise is delayed and likewise is registered, so it is labeled. No. 8 While the given parcel is undeliverable, so it has no barcode. No. 8 wins over No. 3. No. 1 wins over No. 6. Question: Select what holds for Quentin: which option?", "options": ["is stamped", "is hazardous", "has a barcode", "is sealed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is stamped", "unit_id": "u026414", "pair_id": "u026414-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026414-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fd7ed531d9f1e390", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a11", "a10", "a13"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026414-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quentin is not delayed. Quentin is rerouted. Quentin is not misrouted. Quentin is not registered. Quentin is fragile. Quentin is damaged. Quentin is consolidated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is registered, so it is not sealed. No. 2 While the given parcel is rerouted, so it is not scanned. No. 3 While the given parcel is damaged and likewise is misrouted, so it has a barcode. No. 4 While the given parcel is damaged and likewise is registered, so it is stamped. No. 5 While the given parcel is damaged and likewise is undeliverable, so it is hazardous. No. 6 While the given parcel is damaged and likewise is rerouted and likewise is consolidated, so it is sealed. No. 7 While the given parcel is fragile and likewise is delayed and likewise is registered, so it is labeled. No. 8 While the given parcel is undeliverable, so it has no barcode. No. 8 wins over No. 3. No. 1 wins over No. 6. Question: Select what holds for Quentin: which option?", "options": ["is stamped", "is hazardous", "has a barcode", "is sealed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sealed", "unit_id": "u026414", "pair_id": "u026414-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026414-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a575a075eab705c0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a11", "a10", "a13"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026427-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not notarized. Pumice is not backported.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a patch cycle of more than 26, that build is merged. Item B. When the build is backported, that build is tested. Item C. When the build is not notarized, that build has a changelog. Item D. When the build is tested, that build has a security advisory. Item E. When the build has a defect tally of no more than 59, that build is not compiled. Item F. When the build is merged, that build has no security advisory. Question: Can one infer that Pumice has a security advisory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026427", "pair_id": "u026427-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026427-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "b84ecc1cf6c8f284", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026427-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not notarized. Pumice is not backported.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a patch cycle of more than 26, that build is merged. Item B. When the build is backported, that build is tested. Item C. When the build is notarized, that build has a changelog. Item D. When the build is tested, that build has a security advisory. Item E. When the build has a defect tally of no more than 59, that build is not compiled. Item F. When the build is merged, that build has no security advisory. Question: Can one infer that Pumice has a security advisory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026427", "pair_id": "u026427-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026427-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "2c02978db6ec057f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026444-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is perishable. Rasmus is refrigerated. Rasmus is not prepaid. Rasmus has a delivery window of 90.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is prepaid and also is refrigerated, it also has no courier. Clause 2: once any parcel is perishable and also has a delivery window under 54, it also has a courier. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Rasmus is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026444", "pair_id": "u026444-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026444-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3847bf620e710f9e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026444-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is perishable. Rasmus is not refrigerated. Rasmus is not prepaid. Rasmus has a delivery window of 90.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is prepaid and also is refrigerated, it also has no courier. Clause 2: once any parcel is perishable and also has a delivery window under 54, it also has a courier. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Rasmus is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026444", "pair_id": "u026444-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026444-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f92cf82ebc4796ed", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026526-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid has no guarantor. Dagny has a guarantor. Ingrid is underwritten.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is not a homeowner provided that it has a guarantor. Section 2: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it has a guarantor as well as is underwritten. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Ingrid is underwritten. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026526", "pair_id": "u026526-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026526-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "daf4b8096b7d7107", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026526-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid has a guarantor. Dagny has a guarantor. Ingrid is underwritten.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is not a homeowner provided that it has a guarantor. Section 2: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it has a guarantor as well as is underwritten. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Ingrid is underwritten. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026526", "pair_id": "u026526-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026526-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "07b5ab1d70e78a19", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026551-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is indemnified. Fabian is appraised. Fabian has a beneficiary. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Wanda has a beneficiary. Fabian is not inspected. Fabian is uninsurable. Wanda is not appraised. Wanda is not indemnified. Wanda is uninsurable.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is not retired provided that it is appraised. Section 2: a policyholder has no premium discount provided that it is uninsurable as well as is not inspected. Section 3: a policyholder is not disputed provided that it has a deductible waiver. Section 4: a policyholder has a premium discount provided that it is uninsurable as well as has a beneficiary. Section 5: a policyholder is retired provided that it is inspected. Section 6: a policyholder has a dashcam provided that it is indemnified as well as has a deductible waiver. Section 7: a policyholder is disputed provided that it has a deductible waiver. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 7. Question: Fabian has a premium discount. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026551", "pair_id": "u026551-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026551-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2089a5754721dab1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u026551-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is indemnified. Fabian is appraised. Fabian has a beneficiary. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Wanda has a beneficiary. Fabian is not inspected. Fabian is uninsurable. Wanda is not appraised. Wanda is not indemnified. Wanda is uninsurable.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is not retired provided that it is appraised. Section 2: a policyholder has no premium discount provided that it is uninsurable as well as is inspected. Section 3: a policyholder is not disputed provided that it has a deductible waiver. Section 4: a policyholder has a premium discount provided that it is uninsurable as well as has a beneficiary. Section 5: a policyholder is retired provided that it is inspected. Section 6: a policyholder has a dashcam provided that it is indemnified as well as has a deductible waiver. Section 7: a policyholder is disputed provided that it has a deductible waiver. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 7. Question: Fabian has a premium discount. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026551", "pair_id": "u026551-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026551-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e393343b8972f8ff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u026551-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is indemnified. Fabian is appraised. Fabian has a beneficiary. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Wanda has a beneficiary. Fabian is not inspected. Fabian is uninsurable. Wanda is not appraised. Wanda is not indemnified. Wanda is uninsurable.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is appraised, it then is not retired. #2 Each time a policyholder is uninsurable and additionally is not inspected, it then has no premium discount. #3 Each time a policyholder has a deductible waiver, it then is not disputed. #4 Each time a policyholder is uninsurable and additionally has a beneficiary, it then has a premium discount. #5 Each time a policyholder is inspected, it then is retired. #6 Each time a policyholder is indemnified and additionally has a deductible waiver, it then has a dashcam. #7 Each time a policyholder has a deductible waiver, it then is disputed. #4 yields to #2. #5 yields to #1. #7 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Fabian has a premium discount?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026551", "pair_id": "u026551-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026551-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2089a5754721dab1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u026551-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is indemnified. Fabian is appraised. Fabian has a beneficiary. Fabian has a deductible waiver. Wanda has a deductible waiver. Wanda has a beneficiary. Fabian is not inspected. Fabian is uninsurable. Wanda is not appraised. Wanda is not indemnified. Wanda is uninsurable.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is appraised, it then is not retired. #2 Each time a policyholder is uninsurable and additionally is inspected, it then has no premium discount. #3 Each time a policyholder has a deductible waiver, it then is not disputed. #4 Each time a policyholder is uninsurable and additionally has a beneficiary, it then has a premium discount. #5 Each time a policyholder is inspected, it then is retired. #6 Each time a policyholder is indemnified and additionally has a deductible waiver, it then has a dashcam. #7 Each time a policyholder has a deductible waiver, it then is disputed. #4 yields to #2. #5 yields to #1. #7 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Fabian has a premium discount?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026551", "pair_id": "u026551-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026551-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e393343b8972f8ff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u026602-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda has a payout ceiling of 87. Agata has a claim frequency of 61. Celeste has no roadside assistance. Wanda is not grandfathered. Agata has a payout ceiling of 8. Wanda is a smoker. Agata is not retired. Celeste is not grandfathered. Agata is not grandfathered. Wanda has roadside assistance. Celeste is not a smoker.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a premium discount, that policyholder has an adjuster. Item B. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, that policyholder is disputed. Item C. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of more than 88, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item D. When the policyholder is not grandfathered, that policyholder is covered. Item E. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, that policyholder is appraised. Item F. When the policyholder is not retired, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item G. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of no more than 88, that policyholder is litigated. Item H. When the policyholder is retired, that policyholder is a claimant. Item I. When the policyholder has a claim frequency of more than 79, that policyholder is indemnified. Item J. When the policyholder has a claim frequency of no more than 79, that policyholder is lapsed. Item K. When the policyholder is a smoker, that policyholder is bundled. Question: What applies to Celeste?", "options": ["has a premium discount", "is reimbursed", "is lapsed", "is disputed", "is a claimant", "is litigated", "is appraised", "is indemnified"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is disputed", "unit_id": "u026602", "pair_id": "u026602-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026602-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "abf7d9473f3593ec", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a16", "a12", "a8", "a14", "a3", "a15", "a1"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u026602-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda has a payout ceiling of 87. Agata has a claim frequency of 61. Celeste has roadside assistance. Wanda is not grandfathered. Agata has a payout ceiling of 8. Wanda is a smoker. Agata is not retired. Celeste is not grandfathered. Agata is not grandfathered. Wanda has roadside assistance. Celeste is not a smoker.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a premium discount, that policyholder has an adjuster. Item B. When the policyholder has no roadside assistance, that policyholder is disputed. Item C. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of more than 88, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item D. When the policyholder is not grandfathered, that policyholder is covered. Item E. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, that policyholder is appraised. Item F. When the policyholder is not retired, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item G. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of no more than 88, that policyholder is litigated. Item H. When the policyholder is retired, that policyholder is a claimant. Item I. When the policyholder has a claim frequency of more than 79, that policyholder is indemnified. Item J. When the policyholder has a claim frequency of no more than 79, that policyholder is lapsed. Item K. When the policyholder is a smoker, that policyholder is bundled. Question: What applies to Celeste?", "options": ["has a premium discount", "is reimbursed", "is lapsed", "is disputed", "is a claimant", "is litigated", "is appraised", "is indemnified"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is appraised", "unit_id": "u026602", "pair_id": "u026602-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026602-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "fcadabfed6f43a1d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a16", "a12", "a8", "a14", "a3", "a15", "a1"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u026605-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb has a milestone total of 81. Deneb is not renewed. Deneb has seed funding. Deneb has a review mark of 95. Deneb is a pilot study.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is cofunded while has a review mark beneath 87, thus it has no ethics clearance. Provision 2: when the proposal here has a review mark at or above 28 while has seed funding while is renewed, thus it is collaborative. Provision 3: when the proposal here is a pilot study, thus it is not longitudinal. Provision 4: when the proposal here has seed funding while is a pilot study, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 5: when the proposal here is not a pilot study, thus it is cofunded. Provision 6: when the proposal here is a pilot study, thus it has a field site. Provision 7: when the proposal here is cofunded while has a review mark at or above 87 while has a milestone total at or below 88, thus it has ethics clearance. Provision 8: when the proposal here has seed funding while has a review mark beneath 41, thus it has no field site. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Would it be right to say that Deneb has ethics clearance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026605", "pair_id": "u026605-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026605-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "eb2ea51c66ace7da", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026605-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb has a milestone total of 81. Deneb is not renewed. Deneb has seed funding. Deneb has a review mark of 95. Deneb is a pilot study.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is cofunded while has a review mark beneath 87, thus it has no ethics clearance. Provision 2: when the proposal here has a review mark at or above 28 while has seed funding while is renewed, thus it is collaborative. Provision 3: when the proposal here is a pilot study, thus it is not longitudinal. Provision 4: when the proposal here has seed funding while is a pilot study, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 5: when the proposal here is a pilot study, thus it is cofunded. Provision 6: when the proposal here is a pilot study, thus it has a field site. Provision 7: when the proposal here is cofunded while has a review mark at or above 87 while has a milestone total at or below 88, thus it has ethics clearance. Provision 8: when the proposal here has seed funding while has a review mark beneath 41, thus it has no field site. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 8. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Would it be right to say that Deneb has ethics clearance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026605", "pair_id": "u026605-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026605-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4da76dea85ac6b40", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026632-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not tracked. Odile is not palletized. Liesel is not palletized. Odile is not hazardous. Liesel is misrouted. Liesel is not hazardous. Odile is not tracked. Odile is refrigerated. Odile is not misrouted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not tracked: then it is perishable. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is fragile. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is perishable: then it has a barcode. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is not tracked: then it is registered. Policy V. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is not fragile. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is not refrigerated: then it is prepaid. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is palletized: then it has a courier. Policy II is waived if that parcel is not misrouted. Policy II is waived if that parcel is hazardous. Policy V is waived if that parcel is not hazardous. Question: Is it so that Liesel is fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026632", "pair_id": "u026632-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026632-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fc0f561fd1dcd943", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026632-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not tracked. Odile is not palletized. Liesel is not palletized. Odile is not hazardous. Liesel is misrouted. Liesel is not hazardous. Odile is not tracked. Odile is refrigerated. Odile is not misrouted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not tracked: then it is perishable. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is fragile. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is perishable: then it has a barcode. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is registered. Policy V. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is not fragile. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is not refrigerated: then it is prepaid. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is palletized: then it has a courier. Policy II is waived if that parcel is not misrouted. Policy II is waived if that parcel is hazardous. Policy V is waived if that parcel is not hazardous. Question: Is it so that Liesel is fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026632", "pair_id": "u026632-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026632-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6054a59c777d3e91", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026632-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not tracked. Odile is not palletized. Liesel is not palletized. Odile is not hazardous. Liesel is misrouted. Liesel is not hazardous. Odile is not tracked. Odile is refrigerated. Odile is not misrouted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is not tracked, it then is perishable. #2 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is fragile. #3 Each time a parcel is perishable, it then has a barcode. #4 Each time a parcel is not tracked, it then is registered. #5 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is not fragile. #6 Each time a parcel is not refrigerated, it then is prepaid. #7 Each time a parcel is palletized, it then has a courier. #2 is set aside if a parcel is not misrouted. #2 is set aside if a parcel is hazardous. #5 is set aside if a parcel is not hazardous. Question: Do the terms above show that Liesel is fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026632", "pair_id": "u026632-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026632-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fc0f561fd1dcd943", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026632-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not tracked. Odile is not palletized. Liesel is not palletized. Odile is not hazardous. Liesel is misrouted. Liesel is not hazardous. Odile is not tracked. Odile is refrigerated. Odile is not misrouted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is not tracked, it then is perishable. #2 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is fragile. #3 Each time a parcel is perishable, it then has a barcode. #4 Each time a parcel is tracked, it then is registered. #5 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is not fragile. #6 Each time a parcel is not refrigerated, it then is prepaid. #7 Each time a parcel is palletized, it then has a courier. #2 is set aside if a parcel is not misrouted. #2 is set aside if a parcel is hazardous. #5 is set aside if a parcel is not hazardous. Question: Do the terms above show that Liesel is fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026632", "pair_id": "u026632-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026632-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6054a59c777d3e91", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026648-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk has no mortgage. Anouk is refinanced. Tomas is not audited. Wiebke is not refinanced. Wiebke has no mortgage. Anouk is audited. Anouk is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is vetted, then it is not indebted. (2) If a borrower is refinanced, then it is not solvent. (3) If a borrower is indebted, then it has a guarantor. (4) If a borrower is pensioned, then it is not bankrupt. (5) If a borrower is a homeowner, then it is not a depositor. (6) If a borrower is vetted, then it is bankrupt. (7) If a borrower is audited, then it has a cosigner. (8) If a borrower is bankrupt, then it is indebted. (9) If a borrower is pensioned, then it is solvent. (10) If a borrower is pensioned, then it is a depositor. (11) If a borrower is indebted, then it has no guarantor. (11) is void if the borrower is audited. (5) is void if the borrower is pensioned. (11) is void if the borrower is pensioned. (7) is void if the borrower is vetted. (3) is void if the borrower has a mortgage. When (9) and (2) clash, (9) prevails. When (8) and (1) clash, (8) prevails. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. When (5) and (10) clash, (5) prevails. When (3) and (11) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Anouk has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026648", "pair_id": "u026648-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026648-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4ad7b3507122fc88", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026648-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk has no mortgage. Anouk is refinanced. Tomas is not audited. Anouk is vetted. Wiebke is not refinanced. Wiebke has no mortgage. Anouk is audited. Anouk is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is vetted, then it is not indebted. (2) If a borrower is refinanced, then it is not solvent. (3) If a borrower is indebted, then it has a guarantor. (4) If a borrower is pensioned, then it is not bankrupt. (5) If a borrower is a homeowner, then it is not a depositor. (6) If a borrower is vetted, then it is bankrupt. (7) If a borrower is audited, then it has a cosigner. (8) If a borrower is bankrupt, then it is indebted. (9) If a borrower is pensioned, then it is solvent. (10) If a borrower is pensioned, then it is a depositor. (11) If a borrower is indebted, then it has no guarantor. (11) is void if the borrower is audited. (5) is void if the borrower is pensioned. (11) is void if the borrower is pensioned. (7) is void if the borrower is vetted. (3) is void if the borrower has a mortgage. When (9) and (2) clash, (9) prevails. When (8) and (1) clash, (8) prevails. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. When (5) and (10) clash, (5) prevails. When (3) and (11) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Anouk has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026648", "pair_id": "u026648-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026648-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8d8d2c92478fc1c5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026657-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is relocating. Petra is bonded. Olek is not sponsored. Petra is onboarded. Petra is sponsored. Olek is bilingual. Petra has a visa. Petra is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not a graduate provided that it has a mentor as well as is not relocating as well as is not bonded. Section 2: a candidate is not headhunted provided that it is onboarded as well as has a visa. Section 3: a candidate is a graduate provided that it has a mentor as well as is relocating as well as is sponsored. Section 4: a candidate has a mentor provided that it is not certified. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Petra is a graduate. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026657", "pair_id": "u026657-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026657-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cf27cde2bc5e23a0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026657-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is relocating. Petra is bonded. Olek is not sponsored. Petra is onboarded. Petra is sponsored. Olek is bilingual. Petra has a visa. Petra is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is not a graduate provided that it has a mentor as well as is not relocating as well as is not bonded. Section 2: a candidate is not certified provided that it is sponsored as well as is not bilingual. Section 3: a candidate is not headhunted provided that it is onboarded as well as has a visa. Section 4: a candidate is a graduate provided that it has a mentor as well as is relocating as well as is sponsored. Section 5: a candidate has a mentor provided that it is not certified. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Petra is a graduate. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026657", "pair_id": "u026657-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026657-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "849a8ab1a9c66c93", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026657-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is relocating. Petra is bonded. Olek is not sponsored. Petra is onboarded. Petra is sponsored. Olek is bilingual. Petra has a visa. Petra is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a mentor plus is not relocating plus is not bonded: then it is not a graduate. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is onboarded plus has a visa: then it is not headhunted. Policy III. Suppose that candidate has a mentor plus is relocating plus is sponsored: then it is a graduate. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is not certified: then it has a mentor. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Petra is a graduate?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026657", "pair_id": "u026657-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026657-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cf27cde2bc5e23a0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026657-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is relocating. Petra is bonded. Olek is not sponsored. Petra is onboarded. Petra is sponsored. Olek is bilingual. Petra has a visa. Petra is not bilingual.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a mentor plus is not relocating plus is not bonded: then it is not a graduate. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is sponsored plus is not bilingual: then it is not certified. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is onboarded plus has a visa: then it is not headhunted. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has a mentor plus is relocating plus is sponsored: then it is a graduate. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is not certified: then it has a mentor. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Petra is a graduate?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026657", "pair_id": "u026657-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026657-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "849a8ab1a9c66c93", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026690-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach is not preregistered. Nashira is multicenter. Mirach is multicenter. Nashira has no industry backing. Nashira has a citation index of 2. Mirach has a citation index of 55.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has a patent filing: then it is not shortlisted. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is not resubmitted: then it has a patent filing. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has a citation index no higher than 77: then it is a pilot study. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has a citation index smaller than 14: then it is resubmitted. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has a patent filing: then it is shortlisted. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is multicenter: then it is not resubmitted. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal has no industry backing: then it is not a pilot study. Policy V is waived if that proposal is preregistered. Policy II is waived if that proposal has a field site. Policy I is waived if that proposal is not preregistered. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy VII. Question: Is it so that Nashira is shortlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026690", "pair_id": "u026690-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026690-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea7060856cd5d1f1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026690-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach is not preregistered. Nashira is multicenter. Mirach is multicenter. Nashira has no industry backing. Nashira has a citation index of 2. Mirach has a citation index of 55.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has a patent filing: then it is not shortlisted. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is not resubmitted: then it has a patent filing. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has a citation index no higher than 77: then it is a pilot study. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has a citation index smaller than 14: then it is resubmitted. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has a patent filing: then it is shortlisted. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is multicenter: then it is not resubmitted. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal has no industry backing: then it is not a pilot study. Policy V is waived if that proposal is preregistered. Policy II is waived if that proposal has a field site. Policy I is waived if that proposal is not preregistered. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy VII. Question: Is it so that Nashira is shortlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026690", "pair_id": "u026690-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026690-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5a9fe29c54ebfb16", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026714-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is sedated. Gunnar is not vaccinated. Xenia is not vaccinated. Dorian is hypertensive. Gunnar is sedated. Dorian is ambulatory. Gunnar is ambulatory. Gunnar is hypertensive. Dorian is vaccinated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is ambulatory, thus it is contagious. Provision 2: when the patient here is discharged, thus it is not waitlisted. Provision 3: when the patient here is vaccinated, thus it is not diabetic. Provision 4: when the patient here is discharged, thus it is diabetic. Provision 5: when the patient here is vaccinated while is hypertensive, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 4 has no effect when the patient here is not vaccinated. Provision 5 has no effect when the patient here is discharged. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here is discharged. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Gunnar is sedated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026714", "pair_id": "u026714-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026714-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e64bf96b8626ebd9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026714-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is sedated. Gunnar is not vaccinated. Xenia is not vaccinated. Dorian is hypertensive. Gunnar is not sedated. Dorian is ambulatory. Gunnar is ambulatory. Gunnar is hypertensive. Dorian is vaccinated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is ambulatory, thus it is contagious. Provision 2: when the patient here is discharged, thus it is not waitlisted. Provision 3: when the patient here is vaccinated, thus it is not diabetic. Provision 4: when the patient here is discharged, thus it is diabetic. Provision 5: when the patient here is vaccinated while is hypertensive, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 4 has no effect when the patient here is not vaccinated. Provision 5 has no effect when the patient here is discharged. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here is discharged. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Gunnar is sedated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026714", "pair_id": "u026714-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026714-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f656094c86ef00ad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026735-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is interviewed. Petra is not probationary. Petra is not certified. Petra is not sponsored. Petra is headhunted. Sigrid has no background screening. Sigrid is probationary.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is certified, then it has a visa. (2) If a candidate is probationary and is sponsored and has a background screening, then it has no visa. (2) is void if the candidate is headhunted and is interviewed. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Petra is sponsored?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026735", "pair_id": "u026735-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026735-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "77fd7dc080790ed5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026735-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is interviewed. Petra is not probationary. Petra is not certified. Petra is not sponsored. Petra is headhunted. Sigrid has no background screening. Petra has no background screening. Sigrid is probationary.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is certified, then it has a visa. (2) If a candidate is probationary and is sponsored and has a background screening, then it has no visa. (2) is void if the candidate is headhunted and is interviewed. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Petra is sponsored?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026735", "pair_id": "u026735-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026735-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fecd6867c38afb09", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026745-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is not oversized. Nandor has no barcode. Nandor is oversized. Ulla is prepaid. Ulla has a barcode. Nandor is undeliverable. Ulla is undeliverable.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is not oversized, thus it is hazardous. Provision 2: when the parcel here is not fragile, thus it is damaged. Provision 3: when the parcel here is not fragile, thus it is not damaged. Provision 4: when the parcel here is undeliverable, thus it is labeled. Provision 5: when the parcel here is not perishable, thus it is not scanned. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is prepaid. Provision 4 has no effect when the parcel here is prepaid. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is not prepaid. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here has a barcode. Question: Would it be right to say that Ulla is damaged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026745", "pair_id": "u026745-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026745-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bdd33731b31fee6e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u026745-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is not oversized. Nandor has no barcode. Nandor is oversized. Ulla is prepaid. Ulla has a barcode. Nandor is undeliverable. Ulla is undeliverable.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is hazardous, thus it is not fragile. Provision 2: when the parcel here is not oversized, thus it is hazardous. Provision 3: when the parcel here is not fragile, thus it is damaged. Provision 4: when the parcel here is not fragile, thus it is not damaged. Provision 5: when the parcel here is undeliverable, thus it is labeled. Provision 6: when the parcel here is not perishable, thus it is not scanned. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here is prepaid. Provision 5 has no effect when the parcel here is prepaid. Provision 4 has no effect when the parcel here is not prepaid. Provision 3 has no effect when the parcel here has a barcode. Question: Would it be right to say that Ulla is damaged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026745", "pair_id": "u026745-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026745-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f178f23305ab7503", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u026745-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is not oversized. Nandor has no barcode. Nandor is oversized. Ulla is prepaid. Ulla has a barcode. Nandor is undeliverable. Ulla is undeliverable.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not oversized, it thereby is hazardous. Point B. If said parcel is not fragile, it thereby is damaged. Point C. If said parcel is not fragile, it thereby is not damaged. Point D. If said parcel is undeliverable, it thereby is labeled. Point E. If said parcel is not perishable, it thereby is not scanned. Point B is cancelled if said parcel is prepaid. Point D is cancelled if said parcel is prepaid. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is not prepaid. Point B is cancelled if said parcel has a barcode. Question: Statement: Ulla is damaged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026745", "pair_id": "u026745-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026745-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bdd33731b31fee6e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u026745-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not perishable. Ulla is not oversized. Nandor has no barcode. Nandor is oversized. Ulla is prepaid. Ulla has a barcode. Nandor is undeliverable. Ulla is undeliverable.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is hazardous, it thereby is not fragile. Point B. If said parcel is not oversized, it thereby is hazardous. Point C. If said parcel is not fragile, it thereby is damaged. Point D. If said parcel is not fragile, it thereby is not damaged. Point E. If said parcel is undeliverable, it thereby is labeled. Point F. If said parcel is not perishable, it thereby is not scanned. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is prepaid. Point E is cancelled if said parcel is prepaid. Point D is cancelled if said parcel is not prepaid. Point C is cancelled if said parcel has a barcode. Question: Statement: Ulla is damaged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026745", "pair_id": "u026745-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026745-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f178f23305ab7503", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u026752-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is not overdrawn. Anouk has a lien. Evren has a lien. Anouk is overdrawn.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has no lien, thus it has no mortgage. Question: Would it be right to say that Anouk is not overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026752", "pair_id": "u026752-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026752-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "504816cd3cfed9b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026752-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is not overdrawn. Anouk has a lien. Evren has a lien. Anouk is not overdrawn.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has no lien, thus it has no mortgage. Question: Would it be right to say that Anouk is not overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026752", "pair_id": "u026752-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026752-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "34e5c9b0533d3cca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026752-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is not overdrawn. Anouk has a lien. Evren has a lien. Anouk is overdrawn.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has no lien, it thereby has no mortgage. Question: Statement: Anouk is not overdrawn. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026752", "pair_id": "u026752-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026752-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "504816cd3cfed9b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026752-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is not overdrawn. Anouk has a lien. Evren has a lien. Anouk is not overdrawn.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has no lien, it thereby has no mortgage. Question: Statement: Anouk is not overdrawn. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026752", "pair_id": "u026752-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026752-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "34e5c9b0533d3cca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026752-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is not overdrawn. Anouk has a lien. Evren has a lien. Anouk is overdrawn.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has no lien, so it has no mortgage. Question: Is the claim \"Anouk is not overdrawn\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u026752", "pair_id": "u026752-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026752-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "504816cd3cfed9b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026752-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta is not overdrawn. Anouk has a lien. Evren has a lien. Anouk is not overdrawn.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has no lien, so it has no mortgage. Question: Is the claim \"Anouk is not overdrawn\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026752", "pair_id": "u026752-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026752-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "34e5c9b0533d3cca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026810-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery is not monitored. Orrery is not virtualized. Orrery is not encrypted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is monitored, it thereby is not stateless. Point B. If said workload has no firewall, it thereby is mirrored. Point C. If said workload is not autoscaled, it thereby is sharded. Point D. If said workload is virtualized, it thereby has no snapshot. Point E. If said workload has a GPU, it thereby is throttled. Point F. If said workload has a firewall, it thereby has a public endpoint. Point G. If said workload has no firewall, it thereby has a GPU. Point H. If said workload has a public endpoint, it thereby is sandboxed. Point I. If said workload is encrypted, it thereby is provisioned. Point J. If said workload has no snapshot, it thereby has a dedicated host. Point K. If said workload is not virtualized, it thereby is not autoscaled. Point I is cancelled if said workload is encrypted. Question: Which choice is true for Orrery?", "options": ["is sandboxed", "has a dedicated host", "is throttled", "is sharded"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is sharded", "unit_id": "u026810", "pair_id": "u026810-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026810-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d4834a0d52570837", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a1", "a4", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026810-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery is monitored. Orrery is not virtualized. Orrery is not encrypted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is monitored, it thereby is not stateless. Point B. If said workload has no firewall, it thereby is mirrored. Point C. If said workload is not autoscaled, it thereby is sharded. Point D. If said workload is virtualized, it thereby has no snapshot. Point E. If said workload has a GPU, it thereby is throttled. Point F. If said workload has a firewall, it thereby has a public endpoint. Point G. If said workload has no firewall, it thereby has a GPU. Point H. If said workload has a public endpoint, it thereby is sandboxed. Point I. If said workload is encrypted, it thereby is provisioned. Point J. If said workload has no snapshot, it thereby has a dedicated host. Point K. If said workload is not virtualized, it thereby is not autoscaled. Point I is cancelled if said workload is encrypted. Question: Which choice is true for Orrery?", "options": ["is sandboxed", "has a dedicated host", "is throttled", "is sharded"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is sharded", "unit_id": "u026810", "pair_id": "u026810-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026810-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "28afd63a0e8582f3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a1", "a4", "a12"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026823-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo has a delivery window of 89. Thilo is not sealed. Odile has a delivery window of 23. Odile is not registered. Saskia is sealed. Ulla has a delivery window of 98. Ulla is not registered. Saskia is not registered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not registered, it thereby is oversized. Point B. If said parcel is registered, it thereby is not refrigerated. Point C. If said parcel is registered, it thereby is not fragile. Point D. If said parcel has a delivery window of maximum 67, it thereby is fragile. Point E. If said parcel is registered, it thereby is not oversized. Point A supersedes Point E. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Odile is sealed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026823", "pair_id": "u026823-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026823-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d1bf7f1566a0e3c4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026823-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo has a delivery window of 89. Odile is sealed. Thilo is not sealed. Odile has a delivery window of 23. Odile is not registered. Saskia is sealed. Ulla has a delivery window of 98. Ulla is not registered. Saskia is not registered.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not registered, it thereby is oversized. Point B. If said parcel is registered, it thereby is not refrigerated. Point C. If said parcel is registered, it thereby is not fragile. Point D. If said parcel has a delivery window of maximum 67, it thereby is fragile. Point E. If said parcel is registered, it thereby is not oversized. Point A supersedes Point E. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Odile is sealed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026823", "pair_id": "u026823-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026823-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b92d199fed723ee0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026823-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo has a delivery window of 89. Thilo is not sealed. Odile has a delivery window of 23. Odile is not registered. Saskia is sealed. Ulla has a delivery window of 98. Ulla is not registered. Saskia is not registered.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is not registered, so it is oversized. No. 2 While the given parcel is registered, so it is not refrigerated. No. 3 While the given parcel is registered, so it is not fragile. No. 4 While the given parcel has a delivery window not above 67, so it is fragile. No. 5 While the given parcel is registered, so it is not oversized. No. 1 wins over No. 5. No. 3 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Odile is sealed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026823", "pair_id": "u026823-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026823-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d1bf7f1566a0e3c4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026823-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo has a delivery window of 89. Odile is sealed. Thilo is not sealed. Odile has a delivery window of 23. Odile is not registered. Saskia is sealed. Ulla has a delivery window of 98. Ulla is not registered. Saskia is not registered.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is not registered, so it is oversized. No. 2 While the given parcel is registered, so it is not refrigerated. No. 3 While the given parcel is registered, so it is not fragile. No. 4 While the given parcel has a delivery window not above 67, so it is fragile. No. 5 While the given parcel is registered, so it is not oversized. No. 1 wins over No. 5. No. 3 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Odile is sealed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026823", "pair_id": "u026823-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026823-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b92d199fed723ee0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026832-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice has a test yield of 31. Pumice has a lint backlog of 35. Pumice is not minified. Pumice is localized. Pumice is signed.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is localized and has a patch cycle of at most 73 and has a test yield above 56, then it is versioned. (2) If a build is localized and has a test yield of at most 32, then it is experimental. (3) If a build is localized and has a defect tally of at least 60 and is signed, then it is tagged. (4) If a build is localized and has a defect tally below 60, then it has a changelog. (5) If a build has a test yield of at most 85, then it is not documented. (6) If a build is localized and has a test yield above 32, then it is fuzzed. (7) If a build is minified, then it is compiled. (8) If a build is localized and has a lint backlog of at most 35 and has a migration script, then it is documented. (9) If a build is localized and has a lint backlog above 35 and has a migration script, then it is tested. (10) If a build is localized and has a patch cycle above 73, then it is obsolete. When (5) and (8) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Pumice?", "options": ["is documented", "is tagged", "has a changelog", "is tested", "is versioned", "is fuzzed", "is obsolete", "is experimental"], "target": 7, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is experimental", "unit_id": "u026832", "pair_id": "u026832-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026832-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8483de96ed9dfd43", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a4", "a15", "a0", "a9", "a3", "a1", "a13"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u026832-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice has a test yield of 40. Pumice has a lint backlog of 35. Pumice is not minified. Pumice is localized. Pumice is signed.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is localized and has a patch cycle of at most 73 and has a test yield above 56, then it is versioned. (2) If a build is localized and has a test yield of at most 32, then it is experimental. (3) If a build is localized and has a defect tally of at least 60 and is signed, then it is tagged. (4) If a build is localized and has a defect tally below 60, then it has a changelog. (5) If a build has a test yield of at most 85, then it is not documented. (6) If a build is localized and has a test yield above 32, then it is fuzzed. (7) If a build is minified, then it is compiled. (8) If a build is localized and has a lint backlog of at most 35 and has a migration script, then it is documented. (9) If a build is localized and has a lint backlog above 35 and has a migration script, then it is tested. (10) If a build is localized and has a patch cycle above 73, then it is obsolete. When (5) and (8) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Pumice?", "options": ["is documented", "is tagged", "has a changelog", "is tested", "is versioned", "is fuzzed", "is obsolete", "is experimental"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is fuzzed", "unit_id": "u026832", "pair_id": "u026832-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026832-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "144e9a45f523af36", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a4", "a15", "a0", "a9", "a3", "a1", "a13"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u026834-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is not monitored. Zephyr is deprecated. Zephyr is not encrypted. Zephyr has no dedicated host.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is monitored, thus it has a snapshot. Provision 2: when the workload here is deprecated, thus it has a public endpoint. Provision 3: when the workload here has no public endpoint, thus it has a failover node. Provision 4: when the workload here has a snapshot, thus it has no failover node. Provision 5: when the workload here is encrypted, thus it is mirrored. Provision 6: when the workload here has a dedicated host, thus it is virtualized. Question: Would it be right to say that Zephyr has a failover node?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026834", "pair_id": "u026834-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026834-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "2f614289ea16a123", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026834-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is not monitored. Zephyr is deprecated. Zephyr is not encrypted. Zephyr has no dedicated host.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is monitored, thus it has a snapshot. Provision 2: when the workload here is deprecated, thus it has a public endpoint. Provision 3: when the workload here has a public endpoint, thus it has a failover node. Provision 4: when the workload here has a snapshot, thus it has no failover node. Provision 5: when the workload here is encrypted, thus it is mirrored. Provision 6: when the workload here has a dedicated host, thus it is virtualized. Question: Would it be right to say that Zephyr has a failover node?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026834", "pair_id": "u026834-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026834-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "c22df81c6a4ea1e9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026834-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is not monitored. Zephyr is deprecated. Zephyr is not encrypted. Zephyr has no dedicated host.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is monitored, it thereby has a snapshot. Point B. If said workload is deprecated, it thereby has a public endpoint. Point C. If said workload has no public endpoint, it thereby has a failover node. Point D. If said workload has a snapshot, it thereby has no failover node. Point E. If said workload is encrypted, it thereby is mirrored. Point F. If said workload has a dedicated host, it thereby is virtualized. Question: Statement: Zephyr has a failover node. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026834", "pair_id": "u026834-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026834-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "2f614289ea16a123", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026834-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is not monitored. Zephyr is deprecated. Zephyr is not encrypted. Zephyr has no dedicated host.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is monitored, it thereby has a snapshot. Point B. If said workload is deprecated, it thereby has a public endpoint. Point C. If said workload has a public endpoint, it thereby has a failover node. Point D. If said workload has a snapshot, it thereby has no failover node. Point E. If said workload is encrypted, it thereby is mirrored. Point F. If said workload has a dedicated host, it thereby is virtualized. Question: Statement: Zephyr has a failover node. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026834", "pair_id": "u026834-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026834-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "c22df81c6a4ea1e9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026834-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is not monitored. Zephyr is deprecated. Zephyr is not encrypted. Zephyr has no dedicated host.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is monitored, so it has a snapshot. No. 2 While the given workload is deprecated, so it has a public endpoint. No. 3 While the given workload has no public endpoint, so it has a failover node. No. 4 While the given workload has a snapshot, so it has no failover node. No. 5 While the given workload is encrypted, so it is mirrored. No. 6 While the given workload has a dedicated host, so it is virtualized. Question: Is the claim \"Zephyr has a failover node\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026834", "pair_id": "u026834-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026834-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "2f614289ea16a123", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026834-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is not monitored. Zephyr is deprecated. Zephyr is not encrypted. Zephyr has no dedicated host.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is monitored, so it has a snapshot. No. 2 While the given workload is deprecated, so it has a public endpoint. No. 3 While the given workload has a public endpoint, so it has a failover node. No. 4 While the given workload has a snapshot, so it has no failover node. No. 5 While the given workload is encrypted, so it is mirrored. No. 6 While the given workload has a dedicated host, so it is virtualized. Question: Is the claim \"Zephyr has a failover node\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026834", "pair_id": "u026834-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026834-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "c22df81c6a4ea1e9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026839-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not weighed. Kaveh has a weight class of 37. Liesel has a weight class of 25. Liesel is not weighed. Kaveh is tracked.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is hazardous, then it is prepaid. (2) If a parcel is not tracked, then it has a locker slot. (3) If a parcel has a weight class of at least 24, then it is hazardous. (4) If a parcel has a locker slot, then it is not prepaid. (5) If a parcel has a locker slot, then it is misrouted. (6) If a parcel is weighed, then it is not labeled. Question: Is it true that Liesel is prepaid?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026839", "pair_id": "u026839-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026839-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "279f0d9a47f6c8b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026839-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not weighed. Kaveh has a weight class of 37. Liesel has a weight class of 25. Liesel is not weighed. Kaveh is tracked.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is hazardous, then it is prepaid. (2) If a parcel is not tracked, then it has a locker slot. (3) If a parcel has a weight class of at least 26, then it is hazardous. (4) If a parcel has a locker slot, then it is not prepaid. (5) If a parcel has a locker slot, then it is misrouted. (6) If a parcel is weighed, then it is not labeled. Question: Is it true that Liesel is prepaid?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026839", "pair_id": "u026839-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026839-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "91a5c4aecfc60b10", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026839-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not weighed. Kaveh has a weight class of 37. Liesel has a weight class of 25. Liesel is not weighed. Kaveh is tracked.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is hazardous, it also is prepaid. Clause 2: once any parcel is not tracked, it also has a locker slot. Clause 3: once any parcel has a weight class of 24 or more, it also is hazardous. Clause 4: once any parcel has a locker slot, it also is not prepaid. Clause 5: once any parcel has a locker slot, it also is misrouted. Clause 6: once any parcel is weighed, it also is not labeled. Question: Does it follow that Liesel is prepaid?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026839", "pair_id": "u026839-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026839-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "279f0d9a47f6c8b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026839-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is not weighed. Kaveh has a weight class of 37. Liesel has a weight class of 25. Liesel is not weighed. Kaveh is tracked.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is hazardous, it also is prepaid. Clause 2: once any parcel is not tracked, it also has a locker slot. Clause 3: once any parcel has a weight class of 26 or more, it also is hazardous. Clause 4: once any parcel has a locker slot, it also is not prepaid. Clause 5: once any parcel has a locker slot, it also is misrouted. Clause 6: once any parcel is weighed, it also is not labeled. Question: Does it follow that Liesel is prepaid?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u026839", "pair_id": "u026839-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026839-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "91a5c4aecfc60b10", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026869-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar has no field site. Fomalhaut has a milestone total of 78. Electra has a team size of 46. Electra has no field site. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is not preregistered. Hadar is peer reviewed. Fomalhaut has a team size of 8. Electra is not interdisciplinary. Hadar has no steering committee. Electra is not translational. Hadar has a milestone total of 57. Hadar has a team size of 97. Fomalhaut is preregistered. Electra is peer reviewed. Fomalhaut is not translational. Electra has a milestone total of 57. Hadar is preregistered. Fomalhaut is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is exploratory and also is multicenter and also has a milestone total under 70, it also has seed funding. Clause 2: once any proposal is multicenter, it also is not collaborative. Clause 3: once any proposal is exploratory and also has a milestone total under 87 and also is peer reviewed, it also is resubmitted. Clause 4: once any proposal has a steering committee, it also is exploratory. Clause 5: once any proposal has a team size over 47, it also is not renewed. Clause 6: once any proposal is exploratory and also has a citation index over 43 and also is peer reviewed, it also has ethics clearance. Clause 7: once any proposal is interdisciplinary and also has a field site, it also is not longitudinal. Clause 8: once any proposal is translational, it also is multicenter. Clause 9: once any proposal is exploratory and also has a citation index of 43 or less and also has a field site, it also is renewed. Clause 10: once any proposal is exploratory and also is preregistered and also is translational, it also is collaborative. Clause 11: once any proposal is exploratory and also has a milestone total of 87 or more and also has a team size of 44 or more, it also is cofunded. Clause 9 overrides Clause 5. Clause 2 overrides Clause 10. Question: Which of these is true of Electra?", "options": ["has seed funding", "is cofunded", "is renewed", "is collaborative", "is resubmitted", "has ethics clearance"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is resubmitted", "unit_id": "u026869", "pair_id": "u026869-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026869-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d8487073c3e695d5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a4", "a3", "a1", "a14", "a8"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u026869-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar has no field site. Fomalhaut has a milestone total of 78. Electra has a team size of 67. Electra has no field site. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is not preregistered. Hadar is peer reviewed. Fomalhaut has a team size of 8. Electra is not interdisciplinary. Hadar has no steering committee. Electra is not translational. Hadar has a milestone total of 57. Hadar has a team size of 97. Fomalhaut is preregistered. Electra is peer reviewed. Fomalhaut is not translational. Electra has a milestone total of 57. Hadar is preregistered. Fomalhaut is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is exploratory and also is multicenter and also has a milestone total under 70, it also has seed funding. Clause 2: once any proposal is multicenter, it also is not collaborative. Clause 3: once any proposal is exploratory and also has a milestone total under 87 and also is peer reviewed, it also is resubmitted. Clause 4: once any proposal has a steering committee, it also is exploratory. Clause 5: once any proposal has a team size over 47, it also is not renewed. Clause 6: once any proposal is exploratory and also has a citation index over 43 and also is peer reviewed, it also has ethics clearance. Clause 7: once any proposal is interdisciplinary and also has a field site, it also is not longitudinal. Clause 8: once any proposal is translational, it also is multicenter. Clause 9: once any proposal is exploratory and also has a citation index of 43 or less and also has a field site, it also is renewed. Clause 10: once any proposal is exploratory and also is preregistered and also is translational, it also is collaborative. Clause 11: once any proposal is exploratory and also has a milestone total of 87 or more and also has a team size of 44 or more, it also is cofunded. Clause 9 overrides Clause 5. Clause 2 overrides Clause 10. Question: Which of these is true of Electra?", "options": ["has seed funding", "is cofunded", "is renewed", "is collaborative", "is resubmitted", "has ethics clearance"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is resubmitted", "unit_id": "u026869", "pair_id": "u026869-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026869-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5cd083d6e924c79c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a15", "a4", "a3", "a1", "a14", "a8"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u026871-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian has a security advisory. Obsidian is backported. Mica has a migration script. Feldspar is linted. Obsidian has no changelog. Mica has a security advisory. Feldspar is flaky. Mica is minified. Obsidian is minified. Feldspar is backported. Mica is not flaky. Mica is not backported. Obsidian is not experimental. Mica has a feature toggle. Feldspar is not versioned. Mica is linted. Mica is not benchmarked. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Obsidian has no feature toggle. Feldspar has a changelog. Mica is not versioned. Mica is experimental. Feldspar has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is profiled and has a migration script, then it is obsolete. (2) If a build is profiled and is flaky and is versioned, then it is merged. (3) If a build is profiled and is experimental, then it is reverted. (4) If a build has a feature toggle and has a security advisory and is minified, then it is tagged. (5) If a build is minified and is linted, then it is profiled. (6) If a build is experimental and has a migration script, then it is notarized. (7) If a build is profiled and is backported, then it is compiled. (8) If a build is profiled and has a security advisory and is flaky, then it is signed. (1) is void if the build is backported. (3) is void if the build has a security advisory. (4) is void if the build has a changelog. (6) is void if the build is benchmarked. Question: Which option holds for Mica?", "options": ["is signed", "is merged", "is compiled", "is reverted", "is obsolete"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is obsolete", "unit_id": "u026871", "pair_id": "u026871-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/21/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026871-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "28e9b73b862320d5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a1", "a4", "a18", "a15"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u026871-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian has a security advisory. Obsidian is backported. Mica has a migration script. Feldspar is linted. Obsidian has no changelog. Mica has a security advisory. Feldspar is flaky. Mica is minified. Obsidian is minified. Feldspar is backported. Mica is not flaky. Mica is not backported. Obsidian is not experimental. Mica has a feature toggle. Feldspar is not versioned. Mica is linted. Mica is not benchmarked. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Obsidian has no feature toggle. Feldspar has a changelog. Mica is not versioned. Mica is not experimental. Feldspar has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is profiled and has a migration script, then it is obsolete. (2) If a build is profiled and is flaky and is versioned, then it is merged. (3) If a build is profiled and is experimental, then it is reverted. (4) If a build has a feature toggle and has a security advisory and is minified, then it is tagged. (5) If a build is minified and is linted, then it is profiled. (6) If a build is experimental and has a migration script, then it is notarized. (7) If a build is profiled and is backported, then it is compiled. (8) If a build is profiled and has a security advisory and is flaky, then it is signed. (1) is void if the build is backported. (3) is void if the build has a security advisory. (4) is void if the build has a changelog. (6) is void if the build is benchmarked. Question: Which option holds for Mica?", "options": ["is signed", "is merged", "is compiled", "is reverted", "is obsolete"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is obsolete", "unit_id": "u026871", "pair_id": "u026871-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/21/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026871-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "67c55b81998f6832", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a1", "a4", "a18", "a15"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u026893-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has a mentor. Olek has a portfolio.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate has a seniority step above 28, then it is recommended. (2) If a candidate is probationary, then it is not recommended. (3) If a candidate has a seniority step of at most 52, then it is eligible. (4) If a candidate has a mentor, then it is not bilingual. (5) If a candidate has a portfolio, then it is bilingual. (6) If a candidate is not probationary, then it is not eligible. (2) is void if the candidate has a portfolio. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. When (6) and (3) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Olek has a portfolio?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026893", "pair_id": "u026893-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026893-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7c577b7b1bfdcf29", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026893-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek has no mentor. Olek has a portfolio.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate has a seniority step above 28, then it is recommended. (2) If a candidate is probationary, then it is not recommended. (3) If a candidate has a seniority step of at most 52, then it is eligible. (4) If a candidate has a mentor, then it is not bilingual. (5) If a candidate has a portfolio, then it is bilingual. (6) If a candidate is not probationary, then it is not eligible. (2) is void if the candidate has a portfolio. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. When (6) and (3) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Olek has a portfolio?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026893", "pair_id": "u026893-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026893-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "143de3ed4aab44f8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u026920-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Teodor is not probationary. Lotte is not freelance. Jasna is probationary. Sigrid is not probationary. Lotte is not sponsored. Teodor is not sponsored. Teodor is not freelance. Sigrid is not sponsored.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is not freelance, so it has a mentor. No. 2 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it has no portfolio. No. 3 While the given candidate is freelance, so it is licensed. No. 4 While the given candidate is licensed, so it is seasoned. No. 5 While the given candidate is licensed, so it is certified. No. 6 While the given candidate is probationary, so it is not licensed. No. 7 While the given candidate has a mentor, so it is bonded. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is probationary. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given candidate is probationary. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given candidate is probationary. No. 6 wins over No. 3. Question: Select what holds for Lotte: which option?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is bonded"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is bonded", "unit_id": "u026920", "pair_id": "u026920-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026920-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "108e70fafd732013", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a5"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026920-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Teodor is not probationary. Lotte is not freelance. Jasna is probationary. Sigrid is not probationary. Lotte is sponsored. Teodor is not sponsored. Teodor is not freelance. Sigrid is not sponsored.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is not freelance, so it has a mentor. No. 2 While the given candidate is sponsored, so it has no portfolio. No. 3 While the given candidate is freelance, so it is licensed. No. 4 While the given candidate is licensed, so it is seasoned. No. 5 While the given candidate is licensed, so it is certified. No. 6 While the given candidate is probationary, so it is not licensed. No. 7 While the given candidate has a mentor, so it is bonded. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is probationary. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given candidate is probationary. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given candidate is probationary. No. 6 wins over No. 3. Question: Select what holds for Lotte: which option?", "options": ["is seasoned", "is bonded"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is bonded", "unit_id": "u026920", "pair_id": "u026920-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026920-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f08270a879539ed6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a5"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u026921-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice has a security advisory. Pumice has no changelog. Pumice is not reproducible.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a security advisory, and has a changelog, that build is reverted. Item B. When the build has a changelog, that build is experimental. Item C. When the build is not reproducible, that build is tested. Item D. When the build has no security advisory, that build is not experimental. Item E. When the build has a security advisory, and has no changelog, that build is not reverted. Item F. When the build has a changelog, that build is not tested. Item E outranks Item A. Item D outranks Item B. Item C outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Pumice is not reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026921", "pair_id": "u026921-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026921-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "44c2188d2313d962", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026921-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice has a security advisory. Pumice has no changelog. Pumice is reproducible.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a security advisory, and has a changelog, that build is reverted. Item B. When the build has a changelog, that build is experimental. Item C. When the build is not reproducible, that build is tested. Item D. When the build has no security advisory, that build is not experimental. Item E. When the build has a security advisory, and has no changelog, that build is not reverted. Item F. When the build has a changelog, that build is not tested. Item E outranks Item A. Item D outranks Item B. Item C outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Pumice is not reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u026921", "pair_id": "u026921-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026921-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7de0669424efbf24", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u026950-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf has a mobility rank of 80. Yusuf has a fever reading of 14. Yusuf is not vaccinated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is rescheduled. No. 2 While the given patient is asthmatic, so it is diabetic. No. 3 While the given patient has a fever reading that falls below 15, so it is admitted. No. 4 While the given patient is diabetic, so it has a chaperone. No. 5 While the given patient has an interpreter, so it is pregnant. No. 6 While the given patient is vaccinated, so it is symptomatic. No. 7 While the given patient has a pacemaker, so it is ambulatory. No. 8 While the given patient has a pacemaker, so it is not referred. No. 9 While the given patient is asthmatic, so it is anemic. No. 10 While the given patient has a mobility rank not above 79, so it has an interpreter. No. 11 While the given patient is admitted, so it has a pacemaker. No. 12 While the given patient has a fever reading not below 15, so it is asthmatic. Question: Select what holds for Yusuf: which option?", "options": ["is ambulatory", "is rescheduled", "has a chaperone"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is ambulatory", "unit_id": "u026950", "pair_id": "u026950-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026950-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "9cbce25cdb486c1c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a12", "a14"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026950-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf has a mobility rank of 80. Yusuf has a fever reading of 29. Yusuf is not vaccinated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is rescheduled. No. 2 While the given patient is asthmatic, so it is diabetic. No. 3 While the given patient has a fever reading that falls below 15, so it is admitted. No. 4 While the given patient is diabetic, so it has a chaperone. No. 5 While the given patient has an interpreter, so it is pregnant. No. 6 While the given patient is vaccinated, so it is symptomatic. No. 7 While the given patient has a pacemaker, so it is ambulatory. No. 8 While the given patient has a pacemaker, so it is not referred. No. 9 While the given patient is asthmatic, so it is anemic. No. 10 While the given patient has a mobility rank not above 79, so it has an interpreter. No. 11 While the given patient is admitted, so it has a pacemaker. No. 12 While the given patient has a fever reading not below 15, so it is asthmatic. Question: Select what holds for Yusuf: which option?", "options": ["is ambulatory", "is rescheduled", "has a chaperone"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a chaperone", "unit_id": "u026950", "pair_id": "u026950-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026950-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "054010dc00140445", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a12", "a14"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u026969-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren has an escrow account. Greta is solvent. Evren is a depositor. Greta is delinquent. Evren is not audited. Dagny is overdrawn. Evren has a guarantor. Evren is prequalified. Greta is prequalified. Greta is audited. Greta is creditworthy. Dagny is prequalified. Dagny is creditworthy. Ingrid is overdrawn. Evren is not bankrupt. Greta is overdrawn. Evren is not overdrawn. Evren has a cosigner. Greta has a guarantor. Dagny is not delinquent. Greta is a depositor. Ingrid is not delinquent. Greta has an escrow account. Evren is not delinquent. Dagny is audited. Ingrid has a cosigner.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is not solvent, then it is vetted. (2) If a borrower is amortized and is a depositor and is not bankrupt, then it has collateral. (3) If a borrower is amortized and is not audited and is not creditworthy, then it is indebted. (4) If a borrower is amortized and is audited, then it is employed. (5) If a borrower is not a homeowner, then it has no lien. (6) If a borrower is overdrawn and is prequalified, then it is not foreclosed. (7) If a borrower is amortized and is not a depositor and is bankrupt, then it is a homeowner. (8) If a borrower is not delinquent and has a guarantor, then it is not garnished. (9) If a borrower is amortized and has an escrow account and is not a depositor, then it is pensioned. (10) If a borrower has a cosigner, then it is amortized. (11) If a borrower is amortized and is not solvent, then it is underwritten. (12) If a borrower is amortized and is solvent and is not foreclosed, then it has a mortgage. Question: Which option holds for Evren?", "options": ["is underwritten", "has collateral", "is a homeowner", "is pensioned", "has a mortgage", "is employed", "is indebted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u026969", "pair_id": "u026969-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026969-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "30d44aada1c577c5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a4", "a10", "a19", "a20", "a7", "a22"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u026969-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren has an escrow account. Greta is solvent. Evren is not a depositor. Greta is delinquent. Evren is not audited. Dagny is overdrawn. Evren has a guarantor. Evren is prequalified. Greta is prequalified. Greta is audited. Greta is creditworthy. Dagny is prequalified. Dagny is creditworthy. Ingrid is overdrawn. Evren is not bankrupt. Greta is overdrawn. Evren is not overdrawn. Evren has a cosigner. Greta has a guarantor. Dagny is not delinquent. Greta is a depositor. Ingrid is not delinquent. Greta has an escrow account. Evren is not delinquent. Dagny is audited. Ingrid has a cosigner.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is not solvent, then it is vetted. (2) If a borrower is amortized and is a depositor and is not bankrupt, then it has collateral. (3) If a borrower is amortized and is not audited and is not creditworthy, then it is indebted. (4) If a borrower is amortized and is audited, then it is employed. (5) If a borrower is not a homeowner, then it has no lien. (6) If a borrower is overdrawn and is prequalified, then it is not foreclosed. (7) If a borrower is amortized and is not a depositor and is bankrupt, then it is a homeowner. (8) If a borrower is not delinquent and has a guarantor, then it is not garnished. (9) If a borrower is amortized and has an escrow account and is not a depositor, then it is pensioned. (10) If a borrower has a cosigner, then it is amortized. (11) If a borrower is amortized and is not solvent, then it is underwritten. (12) If a borrower is amortized and is solvent and is not foreclosed, then it has a mortgage. Question: Which option holds for Evren?", "options": ["is underwritten", "has collateral", "is a homeowner", "is pensioned", "has a mortgage", "is employed", "is indebted"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is pensioned", "unit_id": "u026969", "pair_id": "u026969-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026969-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "d016668817e0f154", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a4", "a10", "a19", "a20", "a7", "a22"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u026969-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren has an escrow account. Greta is solvent. Evren is a depositor. Greta is delinquent. Evren is not audited. Dagny is overdrawn. Evren has a guarantor. Evren is prequalified. Greta is prequalified. Greta is audited. Greta is creditworthy. Dagny is prequalified. Dagny is creditworthy. Ingrid is overdrawn. Evren is not bankrupt. Greta is overdrawn. Evren is not overdrawn. Evren has a cosigner. Greta has a guarantor. Dagny is not delinquent. Greta is a depositor. Ingrid is not delinquent. Greta has an escrow account. Evren is not delinquent. Dagny is audited. Ingrid has a cosigner.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is not solvent, it also is vetted. Clause 2: once any borrower is amortized and also is a depositor and also is not bankrupt, it also has collateral. Clause 3: once any borrower is amortized and also is not audited and also is not creditworthy, it also is indebted. Clause 4: once any borrower is amortized and also is audited, it also is employed. Clause 5: once any borrower is not a homeowner, it also has no lien. Clause 6: once any borrower is overdrawn and also is prequalified, it also is not foreclosed. Clause 7: once any borrower is amortized and also is not a depositor and also is bankrupt, it also is a homeowner. Clause 8: once any borrower is not delinquent and also has a guarantor, it also is not garnished. Clause 9: once any borrower is amortized and also has an escrow account and also is not a depositor, it also is pensioned. Clause 10: once any borrower has a cosigner, it also is amortized. Clause 11: once any borrower is amortized and also is not solvent, it also is underwritten. Clause 12: once any borrower is amortized and also is solvent and also is not foreclosed, it also has a mortgage. Question: Which of these is true of Evren?", "options": ["is underwritten", "has collateral", "is a homeowner", "is pensioned", "has a mortgage", "is employed", "is indebted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u026969", "pair_id": "u026969-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026969-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "30d44aada1c577c5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a4", "a10", "a19", "a20", "a7", "a22"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u026969-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren has an escrow account. Greta is solvent. Evren is not a depositor. Greta is delinquent. Evren is not audited. Dagny is overdrawn. Evren has a guarantor. Evren is prequalified. Greta is prequalified. Greta is audited. Greta is creditworthy. Dagny is prequalified. Dagny is creditworthy. Ingrid is overdrawn. Evren is not bankrupt. Greta is overdrawn. Evren is not overdrawn. Evren has a cosigner. Greta has a guarantor. Dagny is not delinquent. Greta is a depositor. Ingrid is not delinquent. Greta has an escrow account. Evren is not delinquent. Dagny is audited. Ingrid has a cosigner.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is not solvent, it also is vetted. Clause 2: once any borrower is amortized and also is a depositor and also is not bankrupt, it also has collateral. Clause 3: once any borrower is amortized and also is not audited and also is not creditworthy, it also is indebted. Clause 4: once any borrower is amortized and also is audited, it also is employed. Clause 5: once any borrower is not a homeowner, it also has no lien. Clause 6: once any borrower is overdrawn and also is prequalified, it also is not foreclosed. Clause 7: once any borrower is amortized and also is not a depositor and also is bankrupt, it also is a homeowner. Clause 8: once any borrower is not delinquent and also has a guarantor, it also is not garnished. Clause 9: once any borrower is amortized and also has an escrow account and also is not a depositor, it also is pensioned. Clause 10: once any borrower has a cosigner, it also is amortized. Clause 11: once any borrower is amortized and also is not solvent, it also is underwritten. Clause 12: once any borrower is amortized and also is solvent and also is not foreclosed, it also has a mortgage. Question: Which of these is true of Evren?", "options": ["is underwritten", "has collateral", "is a homeowner", "is pensioned", "has a mortgage", "is employed", "is indebted"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is pensioned", "unit_id": "u026969", "pair_id": "u026969-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026969-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "d016668817e0f154", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a4", "a10", "a19", "a20", "a7", "a22"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u026969-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren has an escrow account. Greta is solvent. Evren is a depositor. Greta is delinquent. Evren is not audited. Dagny is overdrawn. Evren has a guarantor. Evren is prequalified. Greta is prequalified. Greta is audited. Greta is creditworthy. Dagny is prequalified. Dagny is creditworthy. Ingrid is overdrawn. Evren is not bankrupt. Greta is overdrawn. Evren is not overdrawn. Evren has a cosigner. Greta has a guarantor. Dagny is not delinquent. Greta is a depositor. Ingrid is not delinquent. Greta has an escrow account. Evren is not delinquent. Dagny is audited. Ingrid has a cosigner.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is not solvent, that borrower is vetted. Item B. When the borrower is amortized, and is a depositor, and is not bankrupt, that borrower has collateral. Item C. When the borrower is amortized, and is not audited, and is not creditworthy, that borrower is indebted. Item D. When the borrower is amortized, and is audited, that borrower is employed. Item E. When the borrower is not a homeowner, that borrower has no lien. Item F. When the borrower is overdrawn, and is prequalified, that borrower is not foreclosed. Item G. When the borrower is amortized, and is not a depositor, and is bankrupt, that borrower is a homeowner. Item H. When the borrower is not delinquent, and has a guarantor, that borrower is not garnished. Item I. When the borrower is amortized, and has an escrow account, and is not a depositor, that borrower is pensioned. Item J. When the borrower has a cosigner, that borrower is amortized. Item K. When the borrower is amortized, and is not solvent, that borrower is underwritten. Item L. When the borrower is amortized, and is solvent, and is not foreclosed, that borrower has a mortgage. Question: What applies to Evren?", "options": ["is underwritten", "has collateral", "is a homeowner", "is pensioned", "has a mortgage", "is employed", "is indebted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u026969", "pair_id": "u026969-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026969-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "30d44aada1c577c5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a4", "a10", "a19", "a20", "a7", "a22"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u026969-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Evren has an escrow account. Greta is solvent. Evren is not a depositor. Greta is delinquent. Evren is not audited. Dagny is overdrawn. Evren has a guarantor. Evren is prequalified. Greta is prequalified. Greta is audited. Greta is creditworthy. Dagny is prequalified. Dagny is creditworthy. Ingrid is overdrawn. Evren is not bankrupt. Greta is overdrawn. Evren is not overdrawn. Evren has a cosigner. Greta has a guarantor. Dagny is not delinquent. Greta is a depositor. Ingrid is not delinquent. Greta has an escrow account. Evren is not delinquent. Dagny is audited. Ingrid has a cosigner.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is not solvent, that borrower is vetted. Item B. When the borrower is amortized, and is a depositor, and is not bankrupt, that borrower has collateral. Item C. When the borrower is amortized, and is not audited, and is not creditworthy, that borrower is indebted. Item D. When the borrower is amortized, and is audited, that borrower is employed. Item E. When the borrower is not a homeowner, that borrower has no lien. Item F. When the borrower is overdrawn, and is prequalified, that borrower is not foreclosed. Item G. When the borrower is amortized, and is not a depositor, and is bankrupt, that borrower is a homeowner. Item H. When the borrower is not delinquent, and has a guarantor, that borrower is not garnished. Item I. When the borrower is amortized, and has an escrow account, and is not a depositor, that borrower is pensioned. Item J. When the borrower has a cosigner, that borrower is amortized. Item K. When the borrower is amortized, and is not solvent, that borrower is underwritten. Item L. When the borrower is amortized, and is solvent, and is not foreclosed, that borrower has a mortgage. Question: What applies to Evren?", "options": ["is underwritten", "has collateral", "is a homeowner", "is pensioned", "has a mortgage", "is employed", "is indebted"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is pensioned", "unit_id": "u026969", "pair_id": "u026969-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u026969-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "d016668817e0f154", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a4", "a10", "a19", "a20", "a7", "a22"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u026991-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra is certified. Jasna has a seniority step of 12. Jasna has a commute radius of 87. Mads has a background screening. Petra has no background screening. Jasna has no background screening. Petra has a commute radius of 60.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is unionized provided that it is bilingual. Section 2: a candidate is onboarded provided that it has a seniority step exceeding 78. Section 3: a candidate is recommended provided that it is certified. Section 4: a candidate is licensed provided that it is onboarded. Section 5: a candidate is sponsored provided that it has a background screening. Section 6: a candidate is bilingual provided that it has a seniority step of 78 or lower. Section 7: a candidate is not interviewed provided that it has a commute radius of 87 or higher. Question: Which statement fits Jasna?", "options": ["is licensed", "is unionized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is unionized", "unit_id": "u026991", "pair_id": "u026991-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026991-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "a07d089052a8ad89", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a3"]}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u026991-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra is certified. Jasna has a seniority step of 12. Jasna has a commute radius of 51. Mads has a background screening. Petra has no background screening. Jasna has no background screening. Petra has a commute radius of 60.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is unionized provided that it is bilingual. Section 2: a candidate is onboarded provided that it has a seniority step exceeding 78. Section 3: a candidate is recommended provided that it is certified. Section 4: a candidate is licensed provided that it is onboarded. Section 5: a candidate is sponsored provided that it has a background screening. Section 6: a candidate is bilingual provided that it has a seniority step of 78 or lower. Section 7: a candidate is not interviewed provided that it has a commute radius of 87 or higher. Question: Which statement fits Jasna?", "options": ["is licensed", "is unionized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is unionized", "unit_id": "u026991", "pair_id": "u026991-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026991-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "27058e7d1ff45583", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a3"]}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u026991-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra is certified. Jasna has a seniority step of 12. Jasna has a commute radius of 87. Mads has a background screening. Petra has no background screening. Jasna has no background screening. Petra has a commute radius of 60.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is bilingual: then it is unionized. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step higher than 78: then it is onboarded. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is certified: then it is recommended. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is onboarded: then it is licensed. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has a background screening: then it is sponsored. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step no higher than 78: then it is bilingual. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate has a commute radius no lower than 87: then it is not interviewed. Question: Which choice is right for Jasna?", "options": ["is licensed", "is unionized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is unionized", "unit_id": "u026991", "pair_id": "u026991-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026991-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "a07d089052a8ad89", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a3"]}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u026991-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra is certified. Jasna has a seniority step of 12. Jasna has a commute radius of 51. Mads has a background screening. Petra has no background screening. Jasna has no background screening. Petra has a commute radius of 60.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is bilingual: then it is unionized. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step higher than 78: then it is onboarded. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is certified: then it is recommended. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is onboarded: then it is licensed. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has a background screening: then it is sponsored. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate has a seniority step no higher than 78: then it is bilingual. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate has a commute radius no lower than 87: then it is not interviewed. Question: Which choice is right for Jasna?", "options": ["is licensed", "is unionized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is unionized", "unit_id": "u026991", "pair_id": "u026991-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026991-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "27058e7d1ff45583", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a3"]}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u026991-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra is certified. Jasna has a seniority step of 12. Jasna has a commute radius of 87. Mads has a background screening. Petra has no background screening. Jasna has no background screening. Petra has a commute radius of 60.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is bilingual, it then is unionized. #2 Each time a candidate has a seniority step greater than 78, it then is onboarded. #3 Each time a candidate is certified, it then is recommended. #4 Each time a candidate is onboarded, it then is licensed. #5 Each time a candidate has a background screening, it then is sponsored. #6 Each time a candidate has a seniority step of 78 or below, it then is bilingual. #7 Each time a candidate has a commute radius of 87 or above, it then is not interviewed. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Jasna?", "options": ["is licensed", "is unionized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is unionized", "unit_id": "u026991", "pair_id": "u026991-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026991-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "a07d089052a8ad89", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a3"]}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u026991-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra is certified. Jasna has a seniority step of 12. Jasna has a commute radius of 51. Mads has a background screening. Petra has no background screening. Jasna has no background screening. Petra has a commute radius of 60.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is bilingual, it then is unionized. #2 Each time a candidate has a seniority step greater than 78, it then is onboarded. #3 Each time a candidate is certified, it then is recommended. #4 Each time a candidate is onboarded, it then is licensed. #5 Each time a candidate has a background screening, it then is sponsored. #6 Each time a candidate has a seniority step of 78 or below, it then is bilingual. #7 Each time a candidate has a commute radius of 87 or above, it then is not interviewed. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Jasna?", "options": ["is licensed", "is unionized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is unionized", "unit_id": "u026991", "pair_id": "u026991-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u026991-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "27058e7d1ff45583", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a3"]}, "attempt": 16}}
{"id": "syn-u027009-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif has a mobility rank of 0. Elif has a fever reading of 90. Elif is triaged. Elif has a pulse rate of 95. Elif has no pacemaker.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient has a fever reading above 23, then it is vaccinated. (2) If a patient is triaged, then it has no interpreter. (3) If a patient is triaged and has a mobility rank of at least 38, then it is not vaccinated. (4) If a patient has a mobility rank of at least 29 and has a pacemaker, then it is rescheduled. (5) If a patient has a fever reading above 60 and has a pulse rate below 68, then it has no chaperone. (6) If a patient has a fever reading above 60 and has a pulse rate of at least 68, then it has a chaperone. When (6) and (5) clash, (6) prevails. When (3) and (1) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Elif has a chaperone?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027009", "pair_id": "u027009-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027009-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9bd96b51ddc30ae7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027009-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif has a mobility rank of 79. Elif has a fever reading of 90. Elif is triaged. Elif has a pulse rate of 95. Elif has no pacemaker.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient has a fever reading above 23, then it is vaccinated. (2) If a patient is triaged, then it has no interpreter. (3) If a patient is triaged and has a mobility rank of at least 38, then it is not vaccinated. (4) If a patient has a mobility rank of at least 29 and has a pacemaker, then it is rescheduled. (5) If a patient has a fever reading above 60 and has a pulse rate below 68, then it has no chaperone. (6) If a patient has a fever reading above 60 and has a pulse rate of at least 68, then it has a chaperone. When (6) and (5) clash, (6) prevails. When (3) and (1) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Elif has a chaperone?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027009", "pair_id": "u027009-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027009-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "67d46ac146e5d9b3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027023-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor has no diploma. Jasna has an aptitude quotient of 84.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient of 35 or above, it then has a portfolio. Question: Do the terms above show that Noor has no diploma?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027023", "pair_id": "u027023-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027023-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "be1905186fab2813", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027023-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor has no diploma. Jasna has an aptitude quotient of 84. Noor has an aptitude quotient of 27.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient of 35 or above, it then has a portfolio. Question: Do the terms above show that Noor has no diploma?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027023", "pair_id": "u027023-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027023-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "6170a28e3f5aaa7e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027024-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Florin is not admitted. Vilja is admitted. Vilja is anemic.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is discharged provided that it is admitted. Section 2: a patient is symptomatic provided that it is not anemic. Section 3: a patient is not symptomatic provided that it is not allergic. Section 4: a patient is vaccinated provided that it is not admitted. Section 2 lapses for a patient if it has a pain level of 54 or higher. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Which statement fits Vilja?", "options": ["is discharged", "is vaccinated"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is discharged", "unit_id": "u027024", "pair_id": "u027024-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027024-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fa5cbb0c35568f9d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a2"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u027024-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Florin is not admitted. Vilja is not admitted. Vilja is anemic.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is discharged provided that it is admitted. Section 2: a patient is symptomatic provided that it is not anemic. Section 3: a patient is not symptomatic provided that it is not allergic. Section 4: a patient is vaccinated provided that it is not admitted. Section 2 lapses for a patient if it has a pain level of 54 or higher. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Which statement fits Vilja?", "options": ["is discharged", "is vaccinated"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is vaccinated", "unit_id": "u027024", "pair_id": "u027024-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027024-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d2240017fc012535", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a2"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u027028-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gneiss is merged. Quartz has a lint backlog of 64. Gneiss has a defect tally of 54. Quartz is merged. Talc has a lint backlog of 27. Quartz is not documented. Galena has a defect tally of 40. Gneiss is not flaky. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 35. Galena has a lint backlog of 16. Quartz is not experimental. Talc is not flaky. Galena is not experimental.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a defect tally that exceeds 86, so it is signed. No. 2 While the given build has a defect tally not above 86, so it is notarized. No. 3 While the given build has a lint backlog that falls below 69, so it is reverted. No. 4 While the given build has a lint backlog not above 63, so it has no security advisory. No. 5 While the given build has a security advisory, so it is fuzzed. No. 6 While the given build has a lint backlog not below 69, so it has a security advisory. No. 7 While the given build is notarized, so it is minified. No. 8 While the given build is reverted, so it is versioned. No. 9 While the given build is experimental, so it is not versioned. No. 10 While the given build is documented, so it is not reverted. No. 11 While the given build is signed, so it is profiled. No. 12 While the given build is merged, so it is benchmarked. No. 13 While the given build is experimental, so it is not signed. No. 14 While the given build is flaky, so it is not minified. No. 6 wins over No. 4. No. 10 wins over No. 3. No. 13 wins over No. 1. No. 7 wins over No. 14. No. 9 wins over No. 8. Question: Select what holds for Quartz: which option?", "options": ["is versioned", "is minified", "is profiled", "is fuzzed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is versioned", "unit_id": "u027028", "pair_id": "u027028-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027028-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4feba6ae88a5ae8a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a3", "a1", "a10", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u027028-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gneiss is merged. Quartz has a lint backlog of 55. Gneiss has a defect tally of 54. Quartz is merged. Talc has a lint backlog of 27. Quartz is not documented. Galena has a defect tally of 40. Gneiss is not flaky. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 35. Galena has a lint backlog of 16. Quartz is not experimental. Talc is not flaky. Galena is not experimental.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a defect tally that exceeds 86, so it is signed. No. 2 While the given build has a defect tally not above 86, so it is notarized. No. 3 While the given build has a lint backlog that falls below 69, so it is reverted. No. 4 While the given build has a lint backlog not above 63, so it has no security advisory. No. 5 While the given build has a security advisory, so it is fuzzed. No. 6 While the given build has a lint backlog not below 69, so it has a security advisory. No. 7 While the given build is notarized, so it is minified. No. 8 While the given build is reverted, so it is versioned. No. 9 While the given build is experimental, so it is not versioned. No. 10 While the given build is documented, so it is not reverted. No. 11 While the given build is signed, so it is profiled. No. 12 While the given build is merged, so it is benchmarked. No. 13 While the given build is experimental, so it is not signed. No. 14 While the given build is flaky, so it is not minified. No. 6 wins over No. 4. No. 10 wins over No. 3. No. 13 wins over No. 1. No. 7 wins over No. 14. No. 9 wins over No. 8. Question: Select what holds for Quartz: which option?", "options": ["is versioned", "is minified", "is profiled", "is fuzzed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is versioned", "unit_id": "u027028", "pair_id": "u027028-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027028-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f4c241d7c4af3096", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a3", "a1", "a10", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u027055-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has a pain level of 71. Florin is not waitlisted. Florin is not diabetic. Florin is not referred. Florin has a caregiver. Florin is not pregnant. Florin is discharged.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is triaged provided that it is diabetic. Section 2: a patient has a pacemaker provided that it has a caregiver. Section 3: a patient is allergic provided that it is diabetic as well as is referred as well as has a pain level of 72 or lower. Section 4: a patient has no pacemaker provided that it has a pain level of 31 or lower. Section 5: a patient is admitted provided that it has a pacemaker as well as has a caregiver as well as is not waitlisted. Section 6: a patient is fasting provided that it is pregnant. Section 7: a patient is not hypertensive provided that it is admitted as well as has a pain level lower than 33 as well as is allergic. Section 8: a patient is hypertensive provided that it is admitted as well as has a pain level of 33 or higher as well as is discharged. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 8. Question: Florin is hypertensive. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027055", "pair_id": "u027055-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027055-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b6fab8b627115909", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u027055-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has a pain level of 71. Florin is not waitlisted. Florin is not diabetic. Florin is not referred. Florin has a caregiver. Florin is not pregnant. Florin is discharged.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is triaged provided that it is diabetic. Section 2: a patient has a pacemaker provided that it has a caregiver. Section 3: a patient is allergic provided that it is diabetic as well as is referred as well as has a pain level of 72 or lower. Section 4: a patient has no pacemaker provided that it has a pain level of 31 or lower. Section 5: a patient is admitted provided that it has a pacemaker as well as has a caregiver as well as is waitlisted. Section 6: a patient is fasting provided that it is pregnant. Section 7: a patient is not hypertensive provided that it is admitted as well as has a pain level lower than 33 as well as is allergic. Section 8: a patient is hypertensive provided that it is admitted as well as has a pain level of 33 or higher as well as is discharged. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 8. Question: Florin is hypertensive. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027055", "pair_id": "u027055-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027055-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c20f9f9bb685379d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u027055-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has a pain level of 71. Florin is not waitlisted. Florin is not diabetic. Florin is not referred. Florin has a caregiver. Florin is not pregnant. Florin is discharged.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is diabetic: then it is triaged. Policy II. Suppose that patient has a caregiver: then it has a pacemaker. Policy III. Suppose that patient is diabetic plus is referred plus has a pain level no higher than 72: then it is allergic. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a pain level no higher than 31: then it has no pacemaker. Policy V. Suppose that patient has a pacemaker plus has a caregiver plus is not waitlisted: then it is admitted. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is pregnant: then it is fasting. Policy VII. Suppose that patient is admitted plus has a pain level smaller than 33 plus is allergic: then it is not hypertensive. Policy VIII. Suppose that patient is admitted plus has a pain level no lower than 33 plus is discharged: then it is hypertensive. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VIII. Question: Is it so that Florin is hypertensive?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027055", "pair_id": "u027055-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027055-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b6fab8b627115909", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u027055-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has a pain level of 71. Florin is not waitlisted. Florin is not diabetic. Florin is not referred. Florin has a caregiver. Florin is not pregnant. Florin is discharged.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is diabetic: then it is triaged. Policy II. Suppose that patient has a caregiver: then it has a pacemaker. Policy III. Suppose that patient is diabetic plus is referred plus has a pain level no higher than 72: then it is allergic. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a pain level no higher than 31: then it has no pacemaker. Policy V. Suppose that patient has a pacemaker plus has a caregiver plus is waitlisted: then it is admitted. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is pregnant: then it is fasting. Policy VII. Suppose that patient is admitted plus has a pain level smaller than 33 plus is allergic: then it is not hypertensive. Policy VIII. Suppose that patient is admitted plus has a pain level no lower than 33 plus is discharged: then it is hypertensive. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VIII. Question: Is it so that Florin is hypertensive?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027055", "pair_id": "u027055-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027055-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c20f9f9bb685379d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u027055-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has a pain level of 71. Florin is not waitlisted. Florin is not diabetic. Florin is not referred. Florin has a caregiver. Florin is not pregnant. Florin is discharged.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is diabetic, it then is triaged. #2 Each time a patient has a caregiver, it then has a pacemaker. #3 Each time a patient is diabetic and additionally is referred and additionally has a pain level of 72 or below, it then is allergic. #4 Each time a patient has a pain level of 31 or below, it then has no pacemaker. #5 Each time a patient has a pacemaker and additionally has a caregiver and additionally is not waitlisted, it then is admitted. #6 Each time a patient is pregnant, it then is fasting. #7 Each time a patient is admitted and additionally has a pain level less than 33 and additionally is allergic, it then is not hypertensive. #8 Each time a patient is admitted and additionally has a pain level of 33 or above and additionally is discharged, it then is hypertensive. #4 yields to #2. #8 yields to #7. Question: Do the terms above show that Florin is hypertensive?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027055", "pair_id": "u027055-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027055-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b6fab8b627115909", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u027055-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Florin has a pain level of 71. Florin is not waitlisted. Florin is not diabetic. Florin is not referred. Florin has a caregiver. Florin is not pregnant. Florin is discharged.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is diabetic, it then is triaged. #2 Each time a patient has a caregiver, it then has a pacemaker. #3 Each time a patient is diabetic and additionally is referred and additionally has a pain level of 72 or below, it then is allergic. #4 Each time a patient has a pain level of 31 or below, it then has no pacemaker. #5 Each time a patient has a pacemaker and additionally has a caregiver and additionally is waitlisted, it then is admitted. #6 Each time a patient is pregnant, it then is fasting. #7 Each time a patient is admitted and additionally has a pain level less than 33 and additionally is allergic, it then is not hypertensive. #8 Each time a patient is admitted and additionally has a pain level of 33 or above and additionally is discharged, it then is hypertensive. #4 yields to #2. #8 yields to #7. Question: Do the terms above show that Florin is hypertensive?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027055", "pair_id": "u027055-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027055-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c20f9f9bb685379d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u027079-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid is not employed. Anouk is indebted. Anouk has a lien. Anouk is employed. Ingrid is foreclosed. Ingrid is amortized. Ingrid is not creditworthy. Ingrid has collateral. Hamid is indebted. Ingrid is delinquent. Evren is not employed. Ingrid has no lien. Evren is indebted. Hamid has collateral. Evren has no collateral. Anouk is creditworthy.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is refinanced plus has a lien: then it is vetted. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is garnished. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is not indebted: then it is not audited. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is refinanced plus is audited: then it is solvent. Policy V. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it is not refinanced. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is solvent: then it is not pensioned. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is prequalified. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower is audited: then it is not underwritten. Policy IX. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy: then it is audited. Policy X. Suppose that borrower is not solvent plus is employed plus is delinquent: then it is not garnished. Policy XI. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it is pensioned. Policy XII. Suppose that borrower is refinanced plus is delinquent plus is foreclosed: then it is underwritten. Policy XIII. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it is refinanced. In a clash, Policy XIII beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy XII. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy XI beats Policy VI. Question: Which choice is right for Ingrid?", "options": ["is solvent", "is underwritten", "is vetted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is underwritten", "unit_id": "u027079", "pair_id": "u027079-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/10/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027079-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "927acc476fb9932f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a7", "a12", "a3"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u027079-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid is not employed. Anouk is indebted. Anouk has a lien. Anouk is employed. Ingrid is foreclosed. Ingrid is amortized. Ingrid is not creditworthy. Ingrid has collateral. Hamid is indebted. Ingrid is delinquent. Evren is not employed. Ingrid has no lien. Evren is indebted. Hamid has collateral. Evren has no collateral. Anouk is creditworthy.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is refinanced plus has a lien: then it is vetted. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is garnished. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is not indebted: then it is not audited. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is refinanced plus is audited: then it is solvent. Policy V. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it is not refinanced. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is solvent: then it is not pensioned. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is prequalified. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower is audited: then it is not underwritten. Policy IX. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy: then it is audited. Policy X. Suppose that borrower is not solvent plus is employed plus is delinquent: then it is not garnished. Policy XI. Suppose that borrower has no collateral: then it is pensioned. Policy XII. Suppose that borrower is refinanced plus is delinquent plus is foreclosed: then it is underwritten. Policy XIII. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it is refinanced. In a clash, Policy XIII beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy XII. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy XI beats Policy VI. Question: Which choice is right for Ingrid?", "options": ["is solvent", "is underwritten", "is vetted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is underwritten", "unit_id": "u027079", "pair_id": "u027079-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/10/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027079-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3a384d4761e35f9b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a7", "a12", "a3"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u027103-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra has no failover node. Sierra is backed up. Halcyon is patched. Sierra is patched. Quasar is not patched. Nimbus is not backed up. Quasar is backed up.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is not replicated provided that it is not patched. Section 2: a workload is not containerized provided that it has a failover node. Section 3: a workload is virtualized provided that it is not backed up. Section 4: a workload is not virtualized provided that it has a failover node. Section 5: a workload is sharded provided that it has no failover node. Section 6: a workload is replicated provided that it is sandboxed. Section 7: a workload is containerized provided that it is sharded. Section 8: a workload is cached provided that it has a failover node. Section 7 lapses for a workload if it has a failover node. Section 6 lapses for a workload if it has a failover node. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Which statement fits Sierra?", "options": ["is cached", "is sharded"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sharded", "unit_id": "u027103", "pair_id": "u027103-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027103-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "665adbcca97788b9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027103-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sierra has no failover node. Sierra is not backed up. Halcyon is patched. Sierra is patched. Quasar is not patched. Nimbus is not backed up. Quasar is backed up.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is not replicated provided that it is not patched. Section 2: a workload is not containerized provided that it has a failover node. Section 3: a workload is virtualized provided that it is not backed up. Section 4: a workload is not virtualized provided that it has a failover node. Section 5: a workload is sharded provided that it has no failover node. Section 6: a workload is replicated provided that it is sandboxed. Section 7: a workload is containerized provided that it is sharded. Section 8: a workload is cached provided that it has a failover node. Section 7 lapses for a workload if it has a failover node. Section 6 lapses for a workload if it has a failover node. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Which statement fits Sierra?", "options": ["is cached", "is sharded"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sharded", "unit_id": "u027103", "pair_id": "u027103-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027103-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1574178839e9a465", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a3", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027184-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has no premium discount. Fabian is inspected. Fabian has a premium band of 67. Fabian has a claim frequency of 30. Agata has a claim frequency of 49. Agata has a premium discount. Fabian is reinstated. Agata is inspected.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has a premium discount: then it has no beneficiary. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is reinstated: then it has no dashcam. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a premium band higher than 53: then it has flood coverage. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is not uninsurable: then it is not subrogated. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has flood coverage: then it is not uninsurable. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is not uninsurable: then it is subrogated. Policy VI is waived if that policyholder is not inspected. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is inspected. Policy V is waived if that policyholder has a claim frequency no higher than 29. Policy III is waived if that policyholder has a premium band smaller than 17. Policy IV is waived if that policyholder is inspected. Question: Is it so that Fabian is subrogated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027184", "pair_id": "u027184-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027184-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b9c3c3833a787993", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027184-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian has no premium discount. Fabian is inspected. Fabian has a premium band of 67. Fabian has a claim frequency of 30. Agata has a claim frequency of 49. Agata has a premium discount. Fabian is reinstated. Agata is inspected.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder has a premium discount: then it has no beneficiary. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is reinstated: then it has no dashcam. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder has a premium band higher than 53: then it has flood coverage. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is not uninsurable: then it is not subrogated. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder has flood coverage: then it is not uninsurable. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is not uninsurable: then it is subrogated. Policy VI is waived if that policyholder is not inspected. Policy I is waived if that policyholder is inspected. Policy V is waived if that policyholder has a claim frequency no higher than 72. Policy III is waived if that policyholder has a premium band smaller than 17. Policy IV is waived if that policyholder is inspected. Question: Is it so that Fabian is subrogated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027184", "pair_id": "u027184-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027184-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "680eaca6221adb9f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027191-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Capella is not theoretical. Capella is shortlisted. Gemma has a postdoc. Aldebaran is not translational. Gemma is theoretical. Capella has a postdoc. Capella is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is renewed provided that it has ethics clearance. Section 2: a proposal is preregistered provided that it is embargoed. Section 3: a proposal is resubmitted provided that it is shortlisted. Section 4: a proposal is multicenter provided that it has a field site. Section 5: a proposal has seed funding provided that it is endorsed. Section 6: a proposal has a steering committee provided that it is resubmitted. Section 7: a proposal is embargoed provided that it is a pilot study. Section 8: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 9: a proposal is endorsed provided that it has a postdoc. Section 10: a proposal has no seed funding provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 11: a proposal is budgeted provided that it is multicenter. Section 12: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it has industry backing. Section 13: a proposal has a patent filing provided that it is theoretical. Section 14: a proposal has industry backing provided that it is translational. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it is interdisciplinary. Section 11 lapses for a proposal if it is translational. Section 5 lapses for a proposal if it is shortlisted. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it is peer reviewed. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Which statement fits Capella?", "options": ["is renewed", "is longitudinal", "is preregistered", "has a steering committee", "has seed funding", "is budgeted"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a steering committee", "unit_id": "u027191", "pair_id": "u027191-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027191-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a7fba781d92aba2e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a13", "a14", "a20", "a16", "a9", "a18"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027191-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Capella is not theoretical. Capella is not shortlisted. Gemma has a postdoc. Aldebaran is not translational. Gemma is theoretical. Capella has a postdoc. Capella is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is renewed provided that it has ethics clearance. Section 2: a proposal is preregistered provided that it is embargoed. Section 3: a proposal is resubmitted provided that it is shortlisted. Section 4: a proposal is multicenter provided that it has a field site. Section 5: a proposal has seed funding provided that it is endorsed. Section 6: a proposal has a steering committee provided that it is resubmitted. Section 7: a proposal is embargoed provided that it is a pilot study. Section 8: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 9: a proposal is endorsed provided that it has a postdoc. Section 10: a proposal has no seed funding provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 11: a proposal is budgeted provided that it is multicenter. Section 12: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it has industry backing. Section 13: a proposal has a patent filing provided that it is theoretical. Section 14: a proposal has industry backing provided that it is translational. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it is interdisciplinary. Section 11 lapses for a proposal if it is translational. Section 5 lapses for a proposal if it is shortlisted. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it is peer reviewed. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Which statement fits Capella?", "options": ["is renewed", "is longitudinal", "is preregistered", "has a steering committee", "has seed funding", "is budgeted"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has seed funding", "unit_id": "u027191", "pair_id": "u027191-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027191-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "902a0bc53d7031ce", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a13", "a14", "a20", "a16", "a9", "a18"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027202-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not admitted. Benedek has no interpreter. Zora is not pregnant. Gunnar has no pacemaker. Zora is waitlisted. Benedek is waitlisted. Benedek is not allergic. Gunnar is not admitted. Zora has a pacemaker. Gunnar is not allergic. Benedek is not pregnant. Zora has no interpreter. Gunnar has no interpreter. Benedek is not admitted. Benedek has a pacemaker. Zora is allergic.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is not anemic and also is not pregnant, it also has no caregiver. Clause 2: once any patient is admitted and also has no interpreter, it also is not contagious. Clause 3: once any patient is not fasting, it also is not anemic. Clause 4: once any patient is not anemic and also is pregnant and also has a pacemaker, it also has a caregiver. Clause 5: once any patient is fasting, it also is hypertensive. Clause 6: once any patient is not anemic and also is not waitlisted, it also is postoperative. Clause 7: once any patient is allergic, it also is not fasting. Question: Does it follow that Zora has a caregiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027202", "pair_id": "u027202-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027202-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "678882076fadefb7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u027202-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not admitted. Benedek has no interpreter. Zora is not pregnant. Gunnar has no pacemaker. Zora is not waitlisted. Benedek is waitlisted. Benedek is not allergic. Gunnar is not admitted. Zora has a pacemaker. Gunnar is not allergic. Benedek is not pregnant. Zora has no interpreter. Gunnar has no interpreter. Benedek is not admitted. Benedek has a pacemaker. Zora is allergic.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is not anemic and also is not pregnant, it also has no caregiver. Clause 2: once any patient is admitted and also has no interpreter, it also is not contagious. Clause 3: once any patient is not fasting, it also is not anemic. Clause 4: once any patient is not anemic and also is pregnant and also has a pacemaker, it also has a caregiver. Clause 5: once any patient is fasting, it also is hypertensive. Clause 6: once any patient is not anemic and also is not waitlisted, it also is postoperative. Clause 7: once any patient is allergic, it also is not fasting. Question: Does it follow that Zora has a caregiver?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027202", "pair_id": "u027202-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027202-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "270e59f6997b56ff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u027207-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia is not sealed. Thilo has a parcel volume of 59. Saskia is damaged. Liesel has a locker slot. Jory has a locker slot. Liesel has a weight class of 43. Thilo has no locker slot. Jory is not damaged. Jory is not sealed. Saskia has a weight class of 40. Liesel is hazardous. Jory is refrigerated. Jory is not hazardous. Saskia is hazardous.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is refrigerated and is hazardous, then it has no courier. (2) If a parcel has a locker slot and is not sealed, then it has a waybill. (3) If a parcel has a locker slot and is damaged, then it is stamped. (4) If a parcel has a parcel volume below 39 and has a weight class of at least 47, then it is not scanned. (5) If a parcel has a waybill and has a parcel volume of at most 74 and has a weight class of at least 34, then it has a barcode. (6) If a parcel has a locker slot and is not damaged and has a weight class below 37, then it is prepaid. (7) If a parcel has a locker slot and is sealed, then it is labeled. Question: Which option holds for Jory?", "options": ["is labeled", "is prepaid", "is stamped", "has a waybill"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a waybill", "unit_id": "u027207", "pair_id": "u027207-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027207-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1a1823cc60881e8a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a4", "a8", "a11", "a7"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027207-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia is not sealed. Thilo has a parcel volume of 59. Saskia is damaged. Liesel has a locker slot. Jory has a locker slot. Liesel has a weight class of 43. Thilo has no locker slot. Jory is not damaged. Jory is sealed. Saskia has a weight class of 40. Liesel is hazardous. Jory is refrigerated. Jory is not hazardous. Saskia is hazardous.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is refrigerated and is hazardous, then it has no courier. (2) If a parcel has a locker slot and is not sealed, then it has a waybill. (3) If a parcel has a locker slot and is damaged, then it is stamped. (4) If a parcel has a parcel volume below 39 and has a weight class of at least 47, then it is not scanned. (5) If a parcel has a waybill and has a parcel volume of at most 74 and has a weight class of at least 34, then it has a barcode. (6) If a parcel has a locker slot and is not damaged and has a weight class below 37, then it is prepaid. (7) If a parcel has a locker slot and is sealed, then it is labeled. Question: Which option holds for Jory?", "options": ["is labeled", "is prepaid", "is stamped", "has a waybill"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is labeled", "unit_id": "u027207", "pair_id": "u027207-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027207-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "58ebe877eff7dbf3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a4", "a8", "a11", "a7"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027207-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia is not sealed. Thilo has a parcel volume of 59. Saskia is damaged. Liesel has a locker slot. Jory has a locker slot. Liesel has a weight class of 43. Thilo has no locker slot. Jory is not damaged. Jory is not sealed. Saskia has a weight class of 40. Liesel is hazardous. Jory is refrigerated. Jory is not hazardous. Saskia is hazardous.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is refrigerated and also is hazardous, it also has no courier. Clause 2: once any parcel has a locker slot and also is not sealed, it also has a waybill. Clause 3: once any parcel has a locker slot and also is damaged, it also is stamped. Clause 4: once any parcel has a parcel volume under 39 and also has a weight class of 47 or more, it also is not scanned. Clause 5: once any parcel has a waybill and also has a parcel volume of 74 or less and also has a weight class of 34 or more, it also has a barcode. Clause 6: once any parcel has a locker slot and also is not damaged and also has a weight class under 37, it also is prepaid. Clause 7: once any parcel has a locker slot and also is sealed, it also is labeled. Question: Which of these is true of Jory?", "options": ["is labeled", "is prepaid", "is stamped", "has a waybill"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a waybill", "unit_id": "u027207", "pair_id": "u027207-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027207-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1a1823cc60881e8a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a4", "a8", "a11", "a7"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027207-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia is not sealed. Thilo has a parcel volume of 59. Saskia is damaged. Liesel has a locker slot. Jory has a locker slot. Liesel has a weight class of 43. Thilo has no locker slot. Jory is not damaged. Jory is sealed. Saskia has a weight class of 40. Liesel is hazardous. Jory is refrigerated. Jory is not hazardous. Saskia is hazardous.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is refrigerated and also is hazardous, it also has no courier. Clause 2: once any parcel has a locker slot and also is not sealed, it also has a waybill. Clause 3: once any parcel has a locker slot and also is damaged, it also is stamped. Clause 4: once any parcel has a parcel volume under 39 and also has a weight class of 47 or more, it also is not scanned. Clause 5: once any parcel has a waybill and also has a parcel volume of 74 or less and also has a weight class of 34 or more, it also has a barcode. Clause 6: once any parcel has a locker slot and also is not damaged and also has a weight class under 37, it also is prepaid. Clause 7: once any parcel has a locker slot and also is sealed, it also is labeled. Question: Which of these is true of Jory?", "options": ["is labeled", "is prepaid", "is stamped", "has a waybill"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is labeled", "unit_id": "u027207", "pair_id": "u027207-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027207-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "58ebe877eff7dbf3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a4", "a8", "a11", "a7"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027207-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia is not sealed. Thilo has a parcel volume of 59. Saskia is damaged. Liesel has a locker slot. Jory has a locker slot. Liesel has a weight class of 43. Thilo has no locker slot. Jory is not damaged. Jory is not sealed. Saskia has a weight class of 40. Liesel is hazardous. Jory is refrigerated. Jory is not hazardous. Saskia is hazardous.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is refrigerated, and is hazardous, that parcel has no courier. Item B. When the parcel has a locker slot, and is not sealed, that parcel has a waybill. Item C. When the parcel has a locker slot, and is damaged, that parcel is stamped. Item D. When the parcel has a parcel volume of less than 39, and has a weight class of no less than 47, that parcel is not scanned. Item E. When the parcel has a waybill, and has a parcel volume of no more than 74, and has a weight class of no less than 34, that parcel has a barcode. Item F. When the parcel has a locker slot, and is not damaged, and has a weight class of less than 37, that parcel is prepaid. Item G. When the parcel has a locker slot, and is sealed, that parcel is labeled. Question: What applies to Jory?", "options": ["is labeled", "is prepaid", "is stamped", "has a waybill"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a waybill", "unit_id": "u027207", "pair_id": "u027207-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027207-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1a1823cc60881e8a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a4", "a8", "a11", "a7"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027207-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia is not sealed. Thilo has a parcel volume of 59. Saskia is damaged. Liesel has a locker slot. Jory has a locker slot. Liesel has a weight class of 43. Thilo has no locker slot. Jory is not damaged. Jory is sealed. Saskia has a weight class of 40. Liesel is hazardous. Jory is refrigerated. Jory is not hazardous. Saskia is hazardous.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is refrigerated, and is hazardous, that parcel has no courier. Item B. When the parcel has a locker slot, and is not sealed, that parcel has a waybill. Item C. When the parcel has a locker slot, and is damaged, that parcel is stamped. Item D. When the parcel has a parcel volume of less than 39, and has a weight class of no less than 47, that parcel is not scanned. Item E. When the parcel has a waybill, and has a parcel volume of no more than 74, and has a weight class of no less than 34, that parcel has a barcode. Item F. When the parcel has a locker slot, and is not damaged, and has a weight class of less than 37, that parcel is prepaid. Item G. When the parcel has a locker slot, and is sealed, that parcel is labeled. Question: What applies to Jory?", "options": ["is labeled", "is prepaid", "is stamped", "has a waybill"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is labeled", "unit_id": "u027207", "pair_id": "u027207-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027207-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "58ebe877eff7dbf3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a4", "a8", "a11", "a7"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027217-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel is symptomatic. Vilja has a mobility rank of 65. Vilja is not allergic. Wendel has a pulse rate of 98. Wendel has a mobility rank of 87. Wendel is not allergic. Vilja has a pulse rate of 76. Wendel is not ambulatory. Vilja is ambulatory. Wendel is anemic. Vilja is symptomatic.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient has a pulse rate above 64 and is waitlisted and is anemic, then it has a chaperone. (2) If a patient is ambulatory, then it is not triaged. (3) If a patient is waitlisted, then it is not vaccinated. (4) If a patient has a pulse rate of at most 22 and has a mobility rank of at least 52, then it has no pacemaker. (5) If a patient has a pulse rate above 64 and is allergic and is diabetic, then it is vaccinated. (6) If a patient is symptomatic, then it is not bedridden. (7) If a patient has a pulse rate above 64 and is symptomatic, then it is hypertensive. (8) If a patient has a pulse rate above 64 and is sedated, then it is fasting. (9) If a patient has a pulse rate above 64 and is anemic and has a mobility rank of at least 78, then it is bedridden. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. When (6) and (9) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Wendel?", "options": ["has a chaperone", "is hypertensive", "is vaccinated", "is fasting", "is bedridden"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is hypertensive", "unit_id": "u027217", "pair_id": "u027217-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027217-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e7d7cb5fd5e5ff36", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a12", "a3", "a10", "a14"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027217-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel is not symptomatic. Vilja has a mobility rank of 65. Vilja is not allergic. Wendel has a pulse rate of 98. Wendel has a mobility rank of 87. Wendel is not allergic. Vilja has a pulse rate of 76. Wendel is not ambulatory. Vilja is ambulatory. Wendel is anemic. Vilja is symptomatic.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient has a pulse rate above 64 and is waitlisted and is anemic, then it has a chaperone. (2) If a patient is ambulatory, then it is not triaged. (3) If a patient is waitlisted, then it is not vaccinated. (4) If a patient has a pulse rate of at most 22 and has a mobility rank of at least 52, then it has no pacemaker. (5) If a patient has a pulse rate above 64 and is allergic and is diabetic, then it is vaccinated. (6) If a patient is symptomatic, then it is not bedridden. (7) If a patient has a pulse rate above 64 and is symptomatic, then it is hypertensive. (8) If a patient has a pulse rate above 64 and is sedated, then it is fasting. (9) If a patient has a pulse rate above 64 and is anemic and has a mobility rank of at least 78, then it is bedridden. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. When (6) and (9) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Wendel?", "options": ["has a chaperone", "is hypertensive", "is vaccinated", "is fasting", "is bedridden"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bedridden", "unit_id": "u027217", "pair_id": "u027217-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027217-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "892ec513a98f9d7f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a12", "a3", "a10", "a14"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027217-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel is symptomatic. Vilja has a mobility rank of 65. Vilja is not allergic. Wendel has a pulse rate of 98. Wendel has a mobility rank of 87. Wendel is not allergic. Vilja has a pulse rate of 76. Wendel is not ambulatory. Vilja is ambulatory. Wendel is anemic. Vilja is symptomatic.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a pulse rate over 64 and also is waitlisted and also is anemic, it also has a chaperone. Clause 2: once any patient is ambulatory, it also is not triaged. Clause 3: once any patient is waitlisted, it also is not vaccinated. Clause 4: once any patient has a pulse rate of 22 or less and also has a mobility rank of 52 or more, it also has no pacemaker. Clause 5: once any patient has a pulse rate over 64 and also is allergic and also is diabetic, it also is vaccinated. Clause 6: once any patient is symptomatic, it also is not bedridden. Clause 7: once any patient has a pulse rate over 64 and also is symptomatic, it also is hypertensive. Clause 8: once any patient has a pulse rate over 64 and also is sedated, it also is fasting. Clause 9: once any patient has a pulse rate over 64 and also is anemic and also has a mobility rank of 78 or more, it also is bedridden. Clause 3 overrides Clause 5. Clause 6 overrides Clause 9. Question: Which of these is true of Wendel?", "options": ["has a chaperone", "is hypertensive", "is vaccinated", "is fasting", "is bedridden"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is hypertensive", "unit_id": "u027217", "pair_id": "u027217-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027217-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e7d7cb5fd5e5ff36", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a12", "a3", "a10", "a14"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027217-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel is not symptomatic. Vilja has a mobility rank of 65. Vilja is not allergic. Wendel has a pulse rate of 98. Wendel has a mobility rank of 87. Wendel is not allergic. Vilja has a pulse rate of 76. Wendel is not ambulatory. Vilja is ambulatory. Wendel is anemic. Vilja is symptomatic.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a pulse rate over 64 and also is waitlisted and also is anemic, it also has a chaperone. Clause 2: once any patient is ambulatory, it also is not triaged. Clause 3: once any patient is waitlisted, it also is not vaccinated. Clause 4: once any patient has a pulse rate of 22 or less and also has a mobility rank of 52 or more, it also has no pacemaker. Clause 5: once any patient has a pulse rate over 64 and also is allergic and also is diabetic, it also is vaccinated. Clause 6: once any patient is symptomatic, it also is not bedridden. Clause 7: once any patient has a pulse rate over 64 and also is symptomatic, it also is hypertensive. Clause 8: once any patient has a pulse rate over 64 and also is sedated, it also is fasting. Clause 9: once any patient has a pulse rate over 64 and also is anemic and also has a mobility rank of 78 or more, it also is bedridden. Clause 3 overrides Clause 5. Clause 6 overrides Clause 9. Question: Which of these is true of Wendel?", "options": ["has a chaperone", "is hypertensive", "is vaccinated", "is fasting", "is bedridden"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bedridden", "unit_id": "u027217", "pair_id": "u027217-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027217-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "892ec513a98f9d7f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a12", "a3", "a10", "a14"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027218-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not signed. Galena has no feature toggle. Feldspar has no feature toggle. Galena has no security advisory. Feldspar has a security advisory. Feldspar is not tested. Galena is not tested.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build has a changelog provided that it is signed. Section 2: a build is fuzzed provided that it is versioned. Section 3: a build is versioned provided that it has a security advisory. Section 4: a build is not fuzzed provided that it is versioned. Section 5: a build has a migration script provided that it is linted. Section 6: a build has no changelog provided that it is experimental. Section 2 lapses for a build if it is experimental. Section 4 lapses for a build if it has a feature toggle. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is tested. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 6. Question: Feldspar is not fuzzed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027218", "pair_id": "u027218-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027218-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bb89ab0eb0858ff5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u027218-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not signed. Galena has no feature toggle. Feldspar has no feature toggle. Galena has no security advisory. Feldspar is signed. Feldspar has a security advisory. Feldspar is not tested. Galena is not tested.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build has a changelog provided that it is signed. Section 2: a build is fuzzed provided that it is versioned. Section 3: a build is versioned provided that it has a security advisory. Section 4: a build is not fuzzed provided that it is versioned. Section 5: a build has a migration script provided that it is linted. Section 6: a build has no changelog provided that it is experimental. Section 2 lapses for a build if it is experimental. Section 4 lapses for a build if it has a feature toggle. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is tested. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 6. Question: Feldspar is not fuzzed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027218", "pair_id": "u027218-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027218-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ce89e36072836d3f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u027251-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirach is preregistered. Deneb is embargoed. Deneb is not preregistered. Mirach is interdisciplinary. Mirach has a postdoc. Deneb is not budgeted. Deneb is not interdisciplinary. Deneb is not shortlisted. Deneb has a postdoc. Mirach is not budgeted. Mirach is renewed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is embargoed while is budgeted while is interdisciplinary, thus it is resubmitted. Provision 2: when the proposal here is embargoed while is peer reviewed while is not endorsed, thus it is collaborative. Provision 3: when the proposal here is embargoed while has a postdoc, thus it is exploratory. Provision 4: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is a pilot study. Provision 5: when the proposal here is embargoed while has no postdoc while is not budgeted, thus it has a patent filing. Provision 6: when the proposal here is not shortlisted while is preregistered, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 7: when the proposal here is endorsed while is peer reviewed while is not renewed, thus it has a steering committee. Provision 8: when the proposal here is embargoed while is not peer reviewed while is endorsed, thus it has seed funding. Question: Which one describes Deneb?", "options": ["has a patent filing", "is collaborative", "is resubmitted", "has seed funding", "is exploratory"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is exploratory", "unit_id": "u027251", "pair_id": "u027251-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027251-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "23c60f2685223654", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a2", "a13", "a16", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027251-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirach is preregistered. Deneb is embargoed. Deneb is not preregistered. Mirach is interdisciplinary. Mirach has a postdoc. Deneb is not budgeted. Deneb is not interdisciplinary. Deneb is not shortlisted. Deneb has no postdoc. Mirach is not budgeted. Mirach is renewed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is embargoed while is budgeted while is interdisciplinary, thus it is resubmitted. Provision 2: when the proposal here is embargoed while is peer reviewed while is not endorsed, thus it is collaborative. Provision 3: when the proposal here is embargoed while has a postdoc, thus it is exploratory. Provision 4: when the proposal here is embargoed, thus it is a pilot study. Provision 5: when the proposal here is embargoed while has no postdoc while is not budgeted, thus it has a patent filing. Provision 6: when the proposal here is not shortlisted while is preregistered, thus it is longitudinal. Provision 7: when the proposal here is endorsed while is peer reviewed while is not renewed, thus it has a steering committee. Provision 8: when the proposal here is embargoed while is not peer reviewed while is endorsed, thus it has seed funding. Question: Which one describes Deneb?", "options": ["has a patent filing", "is collaborative", "is resubmitted", "has seed funding", "is exploratory"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a patent filing", "unit_id": "u027251", "pair_id": "u027251-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027251-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "e4a6a663e2d1b875", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a2", "a13", "a16", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027251-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirach is preregistered. Deneb is embargoed. Deneb is not preregistered. Mirach is interdisciplinary. Mirach has a postdoc. Deneb is not budgeted. Deneb is not interdisciplinary. Deneb is not shortlisted. Deneb has a postdoc. Mirach is not budgeted. Mirach is renewed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is embargoed and further is budgeted and further is interdisciplinary, it thereby is resubmitted. Point B. If said proposal is embargoed and further is peer reviewed and further is not endorsed, it thereby is collaborative. Point C. If said proposal is embargoed and further has a postdoc, it thereby is exploratory. Point D. If said proposal is embargoed, it thereby is a pilot study. Point E. If said proposal is embargoed and further has no postdoc and further is not budgeted, it thereby has a patent filing. Point F. If said proposal is not shortlisted and further is preregistered, it thereby is longitudinal. Point G. If said proposal is endorsed and further is peer reviewed and further is not renewed, it thereby has a steering committee. Point H. If said proposal is embargoed and further is not peer reviewed and further is endorsed, it thereby has seed funding. Question: Which choice is true for Deneb?", "options": ["has a patent filing", "is collaborative", "is resubmitted", "has seed funding", "is exploratory"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is exploratory", "unit_id": "u027251", "pair_id": "u027251-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027251-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "23c60f2685223654", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a2", "a13", "a16", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027251-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirach is preregistered. Deneb is embargoed. Deneb is not preregistered. Mirach is interdisciplinary. Mirach has a postdoc. Deneb is not budgeted. Deneb is not interdisciplinary. Deneb is not shortlisted. Deneb has no postdoc. Mirach is not budgeted. Mirach is renewed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is embargoed and further is budgeted and further is interdisciplinary, it thereby is resubmitted. Point B. If said proposal is embargoed and further is peer reviewed and further is not endorsed, it thereby is collaborative. Point C. If said proposal is embargoed and further has a postdoc, it thereby is exploratory. Point D. If said proposal is embargoed, it thereby is a pilot study. Point E. If said proposal is embargoed and further has no postdoc and further is not budgeted, it thereby has a patent filing. Point F. If said proposal is not shortlisted and further is preregistered, it thereby is longitudinal. Point G. If said proposal is endorsed and further is peer reviewed and further is not renewed, it thereby has a steering committee. Point H. If said proposal is embargoed and further is not peer reviewed and further is endorsed, it thereby has seed funding. Question: Which choice is true for Deneb?", "options": ["has a patent filing", "is collaborative", "is resubmitted", "has seed funding", "is exploratory"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a patent filing", "unit_id": "u027251", "pair_id": "u027251-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027251-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "e4a6a663e2d1b875", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a2", "a13", "a16", "a4"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027269-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has no guarantor. Ilse has a risk tier of 1. Ilse has a debt ratio of 95. Ilse is not vetted. Ilse is indebted. Ilse is not audited. Ilse is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is audited, and is vetted, that borrower is underwritten. Item B. When the borrower has a risk tier of no more than 18, and is foreclosed, that borrower is solvent. Item C. When the borrower is solvent, and has a debt ratio of no less than 84, and is indebted, that borrower has no mortgage. Item D. When the borrower has a mortgage, and is indebted, and is vetted, that borrower is garnished. Item E. When the borrower has a debt ratio of more than 14, and has a guarantor, that borrower is not solvent. Item F. When the borrower is solvent, and has a debt ratio of less than 96, that borrower has a mortgage. Item F outranks Item C. Item E outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Ilse has a mortgage?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027269", "pair_id": "u027269-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027269-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "80ff719f6b4e5507", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u027269-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has no guarantor. Ilse has a risk tier of 1. Ilse has a debt ratio of 95. Ilse is not vetted. Ilse is indebted. Ilse is not audited. Ilse is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is audited, and is vetted, that borrower is underwritten. Item B. When the borrower has a risk tier of no more than 18, and is foreclosed, that borrower is solvent. Item C. When the borrower is solvent, and has a debt ratio of no less than 84, and is indebted, that borrower has no mortgage. Item D. When the borrower has a mortgage, and is indebted, and is vetted, that borrower is garnished. Item E. When the borrower has a debt ratio of more than 14, and has a guarantor, that borrower is not solvent. Item F. When the borrower is solvent, and has a debt ratio of less than 84, that borrower has a mortgage. Item F outranks Item C. Item E outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Ilse has a mortgage?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027269", "pair_id": "u027269-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027269-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bae40366d49f3586", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u027270-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a defect tally of 89. Zircon is not reverted.", "instruction": "(1) If a build has a changelog, then it is not localized. (2) If a build is obsolete, then it is localized. (3) If a build is not reverted, then it has a changelog. (4) If a build is reverted, then it is experimental. (5) If a build is tagged, then it is not experimental. (6) If a build has a defect tally of at most 36, then it is not obsolete. (7) If a build is reverted, then it is obsolete. When (6) and (7) clash, (6) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Zircon is localized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027270", "pair_id": "u027270-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027270-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec8c124f0bd95347", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027270-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a defect tally of 89. Zircon is not reverted.", "instruction": "(1) If a build has a changelog, then it is not localized. (2) If a build is obsolete, then it is localized. (3) If a build is reverted, then it has a changelog. (4) If a build is reverted, then it is experimental. (5) If a build is tagged, then it is not experimental. (6) If a build has a defect tally of at most 36, then it is not obsolete. (7) If a build is reverted, then it is obsolete. When (6) and (7) clash, (6) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Zircon is localized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027270", "pair_id": "u027270-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027270-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bb47f4fc30e98fd1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027270-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a defect tally of 89. Zircon is not reverted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build has a changelog, it also is not localized. Clause 2: once any build is obsolete, it also is localized. Clause 3: once any build is not reverted, it also has a changelog. Clause 4: once any build is reverted, it also is experimental. Clause 5: once any build is tagged, it also is not experimental. Clause 6: once any build has a defect tally of 36 or less, it also is not obsolete. Clause 7: once any build is reverted, it also is obsolete. Clause 6 overrides Clause 7. Clause 4 overrides Clause 5. Clause 2 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Zircon is localized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027270", "pair_id": "u027270-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027270-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec8c124f0bd95347", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027270-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a defect tally of 89. Zircon is not reverted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build has a changelog, it also is not localized. Clause 2: once any build is obsolete, it also is localized. Clause 3: once any build is reverted, it also has a changelog. Clause 4: once any build is reverted, it also is experimental. Clause 5: once any build is tagged, it also is not experimental. Clause 6: once any build has a defect tally of 36 or less, it also is not obsolete. Clause 7: once any build is reverted, it also is obsolete. Clause 6 overrides Clause 7. Clause 4 overrides Clause 5. Clause 2 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Zircon is localized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027270", "pair_id": "u027270-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027270-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bb47f4fc30e98fd1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027270-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a defect tally of 89. Zircon is not reverted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a changelog, that build is not localized. Item B. When the build is obsolete, that build is localized. Item C. When the build is not reverted, that build has a changelog. Item D. When the build is reverted, that build is experimental. Item E. When the build is tagged, that build is not experimental. Item F. When the build has a defect tally of no more than 36, that build is not obsolete. Item G. When the build is reverted, that build is obsolete. Item F outranks Item G. Item D outranks Item E. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Zircon is localized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027270", "pair_id": "u027270-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027270-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ec8c124f0bd95347", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027270-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a defect tally of 89. Zircon is not reverted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a changelog, that build is not localized. Item B. When the build is obsolete, that build is localized. Item C. When the build is reverted, that build has a changelog. Item D. When the build is reverted, that build is experimental. Item E. When the build is tagged, that build is not experimental. Item F. When the build has a defect tally of no more than 36, that build is not obsolete. Item G. When the build is reverted, that build is obsolete. Item F outranks Item G. Item D outranks Item E. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Zircon is localized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027270", "pair_id": "u027270-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027270-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bb47f4fc30e98fd1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027404-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte has a seniority step of 80. Rune is not bonded. Lotte has no portfolio. Lotte is not freelance. Noor has a portfolio. Noor has a seniority step of 89. Noor is not bonded. Rune has a seniority step of 98. Rune has no portfolio.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is interviewed, so it is certified. No. 2 While the given candidate is not bonded, so it is seasoned. No. 3 While the given candidate has a seniority step that exceeds 89, so it is interviewed. No. 4 While the given candidate is certified, so it is not eligible. No. 5 While the given candidate is certified, so it is eligible. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given candidate has no portfolio. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given candidate has no portfolio. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a portfolio. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is freelance. Question: Is the claim \"Lotte is eligible\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027404", "pair_id": "u027404-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027404-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e137e768a4a299ef", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u027404-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte has a seniority step of 80. Rune is not bonded. Lotte has no portfolio. Lotte is not freelance. Noor has a portfolio. Noor has a seniority step of 89. Noor is not bonded. Rune has a seniority step of 98. Rune has no portfolio.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is interviewed, so it is certified. No. 2 While the given candidate is not bonded, so it is seasoned. No. 3 While the given candidate has a seniority step that exceeds 17, so it is interviewed. No. 4 While the given candidate is certified, so it is not eligible. No. 5 While the given candidate is certified, so it is eligible. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given candidate has no portfolio. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given candidate has no portfolio. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a portfolio. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given candidate is freelance. Question: Is the claim \"Lotte is eligible\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027404", "pair_id": "u027404-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027404-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4770fab80e826ff3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u027410-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is not hazardous. Priya is not damaged. Priya has a parcel volume of 82. Priya is refrigerated. Priya is registered. Priya has a postal zone of 36.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel has a postal zone above 82 and is damaged, then it has no locker slot. (2) If a parcel is stamped, then it is oversized. (3) If a parcel is oversized and has a parcel volume above 47, then it is rerouted. (4) If a parcel is oversized and has a parcel volume of at most 47 and is refrigerated, then it is not rerouted. (5) If a parcel has a parcel volume of at least 39, then it has no courier. (6) If a parcel is registered, then it is stamped. (7) If a parcel is hazardous and is damaged, then it has a courier. (8) If a parcel is hazardous and is damaged, then it is fragile. (9) If a parcel has a parcel volume of at most 81, then it is not fragile. When (4) and (3) clash, (4) prevails. When (5) and (7) clash, (5) prevails. When (9) and (8) clash, (9) prevails. Question: Is it true that Priya is rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027410", "pair_id": "u027410-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027410-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "83b49bb77a985b7a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027410-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is not hazardous. Priya is not damaged. Priya has a parcel volume of 43. Priya is refrigerated. Priya is registered. Priya has a postal zone of 36.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel has a postal zone above 82 and is damaged, then it has no locker slot. (2) If a parcel is stamped, then it is oversized. (3) If a parcel is oversized and has a parcel volume above 47, then it is rerouted. (4) If a parcel is oversized and has a parcel volume of at most 47 and is refrigerated, then it is not rerouted. (5) If a parcel has a parcel volume of at least 39, then it has no courier. (6) If a parcel is registered, then it is stamped. (7) If a parcel is hazardous and is damaged, then it has a courier. (8) If a parcel is hazardous and is damaged, then it is fragile. (9) If a parcel has a parcel volume of at most 81, then it is not fragile. When (4) and (3) clash, (4) prevails. When (5) and (7) clash, (5) prevails. When (9) and (8) clash, (9) prevails. Question: Is it true that Priya is rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027410", "pair_id": "u027410-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027410-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f0116682b558c2ee", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027459-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is not tagged. Feldspar is not tagged. Gneiss is documented. Gneiss is reverted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is documented while is tagged, thus it is experimental. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here is reverted. Question: Would it be right to say that Gneiss is tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027459", "pair_id": "u027459-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027459-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d1823beca5f1ae39", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027459-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is not tagged. Feldspar is not tagged. Gneiss is documented. Gneiss is tagged. Gneiss is reverted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is documented while is tagged, thus it is experimental. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here is reverted. Question: Would it be right to say that Gneiss is tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027459", "pair_id": "u027459-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027459-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e7df27aad35f79ff", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027482-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not allergic. Zora is bedridden. Zora is not pregnant.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is bedridden, then it is admitted. (2) If a patient is not admitted, then it is ambulatory. (3) If a patient is not asthmatic, then it is not diabetic. (4) If a patient is bedridden, then it is not admitted. (5) If a patient is allergic, then it is not anemic. (6) If a patient is not admitted, then it is not ambulatory. (2) is void if the patient is not pregnant. (6) is void if the patient is pregnant. (4) is void if the patient is referred. When (4) and (1) clash, (4) prevails. When (2) and (6) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Zora is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027482", "pair_id": "u027482-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027482-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e17ed586c7c1db56", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u027482-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not allergic. Zora is bedridden. Zora is pregnant.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is bedridden, then it is admitted. (2) If a patient is not admitted, then it is ambulatory. (3) If a patient is not asthmatic, then it is not diabetic. (4) If a patient is bedridden, then it is not admitted. (5) If a patient is allergic, then it is not anemic. (6) If a patient is not admitted, then it is not ambulatory. (2) is void if the patient is not pregnant. (6) is void if the patient is pregnant. (4) is void if the patient is referred. When (4) and (1) clash, (4) prevails. When (2) and (6) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Zora is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027482", "pair_id": "u027482-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027482-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3e8bb6fcea1a445d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u027482-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not allergic. Zora is bedridden. Zora is not pregnant.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is bedridden, it also is admitted. Clause 2: once any patient is not admitted, it also is ambulatory. Clause 3: once any patient is not asthmatic, it also is not diabetic. Clause 4: once any patient is bedridden, it also is not admitted. Clause 5: once any patient is allergic, it also is not anemic. Clause 6: once any patient is not admitted, it also is not ambulatory. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not pregnant. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is pregnant. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient is referred. Clause 4 overrides Clause 1. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Question: Does it follow that Zora is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027482", "pair_id": "u027482-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027482-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e17ed586c7c1db56", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u027482-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not allergic. Zora is bedridden. Zora is pregnant.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is bedridden, it also is admitted. Clause 2: once any patient is not admitted, it also is ambulatory. Clause 3: once any patient is not asthmatic, it also is not diabetic. Clause 4: once any patient is bedridden, it also is not admitted. Clause 5: once any patient is allergic, it also is not anemic. Clause 6: once any patient is not admitted, it also is not ambulatory. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not pregnant. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is pregnant. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient is referred. Clause 4 overrides Clause 1. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Question: Does it follow that Zora is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027482", "pair_id": "u027482-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027482-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3e8bb6fcea1a445d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u027482-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not allergic. Zora is bedridden. Zora is not pregnant.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is admitted. Item B. When the patient is not admitted, that patient is ambulatory. Item C. When the patient is not asthmatic, that patient is not diabetic. Item D. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is not admitted. Item E. When the patient is allergic, that patient is not anemic. Item F. When the patient is not admitted, that patient is not ambulatory. Item B is suspended when the patient is not pregnant. Item F is suspended when the patient is pregnant. Item D is suspended when the patient is referred. Item D outranks Item A. Item B outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Zora is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027482", "pair_id": "u027482-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027482-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e17ed586c7c1db56", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u027482-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not allergic. Zora is bedridden. Zora is pregnant.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is admitted. Item B. When the patient is not admitted, that patient is ambulatory. Item C. When the patient is not asthmatic, that patient is not diabetic. Item D. When the patient is bedridden, that patient is not admitted. Item E. When the patient is allergic, that patient is not anemic. Item F. When the patient is not admitted, that patient is not ambulatory. Item B is suspended when the patient is not pregnant. Item F is suspended when the patient is pregnant. Item D is suspended when the patient is referred. Item D outranks Item A. Item B outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Zora is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027482", "pair_id": "u027482-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027482-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3e8bb6fcea1a445d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u027512-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has a dashcam. Celeste is not lapsed. Celeste has a premium band of 83. Celeste is covered. Celeste is not bundled. Celeste is not uninsurable. Celeste is not litigated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is lapsed, so it has no deductible waiver. No. 2 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise has a payout ceiling not above 83, so it has flood coverage. No. 3 While the given policyholder is uninsurable, so it is a claimant. No. 4 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise is litigated, so it has a premium discount. No. 5 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise has a premium band not above 55, so it has a rider. No. 6 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise has a dashcam, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 7 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise is lapsed and likewise has a dashcam, so it is retired. No. 8 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise has a payout ceiling that exceeds 83, so it has roadside assistance. No. 9 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise is bundled, so it is reinstated. No. 10 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise has a claim frequency that falls below 69, so it is grandfathered. No. 11 While the given policyholder has a beneficiary, so it has no roadside assistance. No. 9 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is litigated. No. 11 wins over No. 8. No. 1 wins over No. 6. Question: Select what holds for Celeste: which option?", "options": ["has a premium discount", "is retired", "has a deductible waiver", "has roadside assistance", "is grandfathered", "has a rider", "is reinstated", "has flood coverage"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a deductible waiver", "unit_id": "u027512", "pair_id": "u027512-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027512-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "600e8b51416808a8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a16", "a10", "a3", "a15", "a12", "a5", "a9", "a7"]}, "attempt": 82}}
{"id": "syn-u027512-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste has a dashcam. Celeste is lapsed. Celeste has a premium band of 83. Celeste is covered. Celeste is not bundled. Celeste is not uninsurable. Celeste is not litigated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is lapsed, so it has no deductible waiver. No. 2 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise has a payout ceiling not above 83, so it has flood coverage. No. 3 While the given policyholder is uninsurable, so it is a claimant. No. 4 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise is litigated, so it has a premium discount. No. 5 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise has a premium band not above 55, so it has a rider. No. 6 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise has a dashcam, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 7 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise is lapsed and likewise has a dashcam, so it is retired. No. 8 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise has a payout ceiling that exceeds 83, so it has roadside assistance. No. 9 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise is bundled, so it is reinstated. No. 10 While the given policyholder is covered and likewise has a claim frequency that falls below 69, so it is grandfathered. No. 11 While the given policyholder has a beneficiary, so it has no roadside assistance. No. 9 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is litigated. No. 11 wins over No. 8. No. 1 wins over No. 6. Question: Select what holds for Celeste: which option?", "options": ["has a premium discount", "is retired", "has a deductible waiver", "has roadside assistance", "is grandfathered", "has a rider", "is reinstated", "has flood coverage"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u027512", "pair_id": "u027512-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027512-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2f32780befa23d7b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a16", "a10", "a3", "a15", "a12", "a5", "a9", "a7"]}, "attempt": 82}}
{"id": "syn-u027527-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is not undeliverable. Saskia is not undeliverable. Nandor is undeliverable. Nandor is not fragile. Saskia is not fragile. Quentin is not fragile.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is fragile, that parcel is tracked. Item B. When the parcel is sealed, that parcel has no courier. Item C. When the parcel has a waybill, that parcel has a courier. Item D. When the parcel is damaged, that parcel is scanned. Item E. When the parcel is not fragile, that parcel is registered. Item F. When the parcel has a barcode, that parcel is sealed. Item G. When the parcel is scanned, that parcel has a waybill. Item H. When the parcel is undeliverable, that parcel has a barcode. Question: Can one infer that Quentin has no courier?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027527", "pair_id": "u027527-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027527-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "c3442ee07e0eaabc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027527-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is not undeliverable. Saskia is not undeliverable. Nandor is undeliverable. Nandor is not fragile. Saskia is not fragile. Quentin is not fragile.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is fragile, that parcel is tracked. Item B. When the parcel is sealed, that parcel has no courier. Item C. When the parcel has a waybill, that parcel has a courier. Item D. When the parcel is damaged, that parcel is scanned. Item E. When the parcel is fragile, that parcel is registered. Item F. When the parcel has a barcode, that parcel is sealed. Item G. When the parcel is scanned, that parcel has a waybill. Item H. When the parcel is undeliverable, that parcel has a barcode. Question: Can one infer that Quentin has no courier?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027527", "pair_id": "u027527-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027527-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "f1ee31297d2ac46e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027533-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima has no caregiver. Zora is pregnant. Zora has a caregiver. Wendel is not allergic. Wendel has no caregiver. Zora has a fever reading of 91. Wendel is pregnant.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has no caregiver, it thereby is asthmatic. Point B. If said patient has a fever reading in excess of 76, it thereby is not asthmatic. Point C. If said patient is anemic, it thereby is triaged. Point D. If said patient is not hypertensive, it thereby is not fasting. Point E. If said patient has no interpreter, it thereby has a chaperone. Point F. If said patient has no chaperone, it thereby is not triaged. Point G. If said patient has an interpreter, it thereby is diabetic. Point H. If said patient is allergic, it thereby has no interpreter. Point I. If said patient is asthmatic, it thereby is anemic. Point J. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby is fasting. Point K. If said patient is allergic, it thereby is not anemic. Point L. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby has no chaperone. Point J supersedes Point D. Point C supersedes Point F. Point L supersedes Point E. Point A supersedes Point B. Point K supersedes Point I. Question: Statement: Zora is triaged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027533", "pair_id": "u027533-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027533-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a1dd13a3f09fc19b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027533-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima has no caregiver. Zora is pregnant. Zora has a caregiver. Wendel is not allergic. Wendel has no caregiver. Zora has a fever reading of 91. Wendel is pregnant.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has no caregiver, it thereby is asthmatic. Point B. If said patient has a fever reading in excess of 76, it thereby is not asthmatic. Point C. If said patient is anemic, it thereby is triaged. Point D. If said patient is not hypertensive, it thereby is not fasting. Point E. If said patient has no interpreter, it thereby has a chaperone. Point F. If said patient has a chaperone, it thereby is not triaged. Point G. If said patient has an interpreter, it thereby is diabetic. Point H. If said patient is allergic, it thereby has no interpreter. Point I. If said patient is asthmatic, it thereby is anemic. Point J. If said patient is pregnant, it thereby is fasting. Point K. If said patient is allergic, it thereby is not anemic. Point L. If said patient has a caregiver, it thereby has no chaperone. Point J supersedes Point D. Point C supersedes Point F. Point L supersedes Point E. Point A supersedes Point B. Point K supersedes Point I. Question: Statement: Zora is triaged. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027533", "pair_id": "u027533-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027533-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6ec230eccc0c4499", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027533-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima has no caregiver. Zora is pregnant. Zora has a caregiver. Wendel is not allergic. Wendel has no caregiver. Zora has a fever reading of 91. Wendel is pregnant.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient has no caregiver, so it is asthmatic. No. 2 While the given patient has a fever reading that exceeds 76, so it is not asthmatic. No. 3 While the given patient is anemic, so it is triaged. No. 4 While the given patient is not hypertensive, so it is not fasting. No. 5 While the given patient has no interpreter, so it has a chaperone. No. 6 While the given patient has no chaperone, so it is not triaged. No. 7 While the given patient has an interpreter, so it is diabetic. No. 8 While the given patient is allergic, so it has no interpreter. No. 9 While the given patient is asthmatic, so it is anemic. No. 10 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is fasting. No. 11 While the given patient is allergic, so it is not anemic. No. 12 While the given patient has a caregiver, so it has no chaperone. No. 10 wins over No. 4. No. 3 wins over No. 6. No. 12 wins over No. 5. No. 1 wins over No. 2. No. 11 wins over No. 9. Question: Is the claim \"Zora is triaged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027533", "pair_id": "u027533-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027533-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a1dd13a3f09fc19b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027533-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Cosima has no caregiver. Zora is pregnant. Zora has a caregiver. Wendel is not allergic. Wendel has no caregiver. Zora has a fever reading of 91. Wendel is pregnant.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient has no caregiver, so it is asthmatic. No. 2 While the given patient has a fever reading that exceeds 76, so it is not asthmatic. No. 3 While the given patient is anemic, so it is triaged. No. 4 While the given patient is not hypertensive, so it is not fasting. No. 5 While the given patient has no interpreter, so it has a chaperone. No. 6 While the given patient has a chaperone, so it is not triaged. No. 7 While the given patient has an interpreter, so it is diabetic. No. 8 While the given patient is allergic, so it has no interpreter. No. 9 While the given patient is asthmatic, so it is anemic. No. 10 While the given patient is pregnant, so it is fasting. No. 11 While the given patient is allergic, so it is not anemic. No. 12 While the given patient has a caregiver, so it has no chaperone. No. 10 wins over No. 4. No. 3 wins over No. 6. No. 12 wins over No. 5. No. 1 wins over No. 2. No. 11 wins over No. 9. Question: Is the claim \"Zora is triaged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027533", "pair_id": "u027533-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027533-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6ec230eccc0c4499", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027566-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Lotte is not bonded. Rune is onboarded. Rune is recommended. Lotte is not probationary. Petra is onboarded. Rune is headhunted. Noor is onboarded. Rune is not freelance. Noor is relocating. Lotte has a background screening. Rune is not relocating. Rune is interviewed. Rune has no signing bonus. Petra is probationary. Petra is recommended. Petra is relocating. Noor has a signing bonus. Petra has a background screening. Lotte is recommended. Noor is not freelance. Petra has a signing bonus. Rune has no background screening. Petra is not bonded. Lotte is not interviewed. Noor is not probationary. Petra is not interviewed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is eligible provided that it is certified as well as is probationary. Section 2: a candidate has a mentor provided that it is certified as well as is bonded. Section 3: a candidate is a veteran provided that it is certified as well as is relocating as well as is licensed. Section 4: a candidate is a graduate provided that it is onboarded as well as is headhunted as well as is bonded. Section 5: a candidate is unionized provided that it has a signing bonus as well as is relocating. Section 6: a candidate is licensed provided that it is interviewed. Section 7: a candidate is certified provided that it has a background screening as well as is recommended. Section 8: a candidate is fingerprinted provided that it is certified as well as is seasoned as well as is unionized. Section 9: a candidate has a visa provided that it is certified as well as is freelance. Section 4 lapses for a candidate if it has a signing bonus. Section 2 lapses for a candidate if it is freelance. Section 3 lapses for a candidate if it is recommended. Section 1 lapses for a candidate if it is seasoned. Question: Which statement fits Petra?", "options": ["is fingerprinted", "has a visa", "is eligible", "has a mentor", "is a veteran"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is eligible", "unit_id": "u027566", "pair_id": "u027566-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027566-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6fc393c38273bf3b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a19", "a4", "a7", "a10"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u027566-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Lotte is not bonded. Rune is onboarded. Rune is recommended. Lotte is not probationary. Petra is onboarded. Petra is seasoned. Rune is headhunted. Noor is onboarded. Rune is not freelance. Noor is relocating. Lotte has a background screening. Rune is not relocating. Rune is interviewed. Rune has no signing bonus. Petra is probationary. Petra is recommended. Petra is relocating. Noor has a signing bonus. Petra has a background screening. Lotte is recommended. Noor is not freelance. Petra has a signing bonus. Rune has no background screening. Petra is not bonded. Lotte is not interviewed. Noor is not probationary. Petra is not interviewed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is eligible provided that it is certified as well as is probationary. Section 2: a candidate has a mentor provided that it is certified as well as is bonded. Section 3: a candidate is a veteran provided that it is certified as well as is relocating as well as is licensed. Section 4: a candidate is a graduate provided that it is onboarded as well as is headhunted as well as is bonded. Section 5: a candidate is unionized provided that it has a signing bonus as well as is relocating. Section 6: a candidate is licensed provided that it is interviewed. Section 7: a candidate is certified provided that it has a background screening as well as is recommended. Section 8: a candidate is fingerprinted provided that it is certified as well as is seasoned as well as is unionized. Section 9: a candidate has a visa provided that it is certified as well as is freelance. Section 4 lapses for a candidate if it has a signing bonus. Section 2 lapses for a candidate if it is freelance. Section 3 lapses for a candidate if it is recommended. Section 1 lapses for a candidate if it is seasoned. Question: Which statement fits Petra?", "options": ["is fingerprinted", "has a visa", "is eligible", "has a mentor", "is a veteran"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is fingerprinted", "unit_id": "u027566", "pair_id": "u027566-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027566-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9114238e8c61fbbd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a19", "a4", "a7", "a10"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u027566-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Lotte is not bonded. Rune is onboarded. Rune is recommended. Lotte is not probationary. Petra is onboarded. Rune is headhunted. Noor is onboarded. Rune is not freelance. Noor is relocating. Lotte has a background screening. Rune is not relocating. Rune is interviewed. Rune has no signing bonus. Petra is probationary. Petra is recommended. Petra is relocating. Noor has a signing bonus. Petra has a background screening. Lotte is recommended. Noor is not freelance. Petra has a signing bonus. Rune has no background screening. Petra is not bonded. Lotte is not interviewed. Noor is not probationary. Petra is not interviewed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is certified plus is probationary: then it is eligible. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is certified plus is bonded: then it has a mentor. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is certified plus is relocating plus is licensed: then it is a veteran. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is onboarded plus is headhunted plus is bonded: then it is a graduate. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has a signing bonus plus is relocating: then it is unionized. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is interviewed: then it is licensed. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus is recommended: then it is certified. Policy VIII. Suppose that candidate is certified plus is seasoned plus is unionized: then it is fingerprinted. Policy IX. Suppose that candidate is certified plus is freelance: then it has a visa. Policy IV is waived if that candidate has a signing bonus. Policy II is waived if that candidate is freelance. Policy III is waived if that candidate is recommended. Policy I is waived if that candidate is seasoned. Question: Which choice is right for Petra?", "options": ["is fingerprinted", "has a visa", "is eligible", "has a mentor", "is a veteran"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is eligible", "unit_id": "u027566", "pair_id": "u027566-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027566-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6fc393c38273bf3b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a19", "a4", "a7", "a10"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u027566-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Lotte is not bonded. Rune is onboarded. Rune is recommended. Lotte is not probationary. Petra is onboarded. Petra is seasoned. Rune is headhunted. Noor is onboarded. Rune is not freelance. Noor is relocating. Lotte has a background screening. Rune is not relocating. Rune is interviewed. Rune has no signing bonus. Petra is probationary. Petra is recommended. Petra is relocating. Noor has a signing bonus. Petra has a background screening. Lotte is recommended. Noor is not freelance. Petra has a signing bonus. Rune has no background screening. Petra is not bonded. Lotte is not interviewed. Noor is not probationary. Petra is not interviewed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is certified plus is probationary: then it is eligible. Policy II. Suppose that candidate is certified plus is bonded: then it has a mentor. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is certified plus is relocating plus is licensed: then it is a veteran. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is onboarded plus is headhunted plus is bonded: then it is a graduate. Policy V. Suppose that candidate has a signing bonus plus is relocating: then it is unionized. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate is interviewed: then it is licensed. Policy VII. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus is recommended: then it is certified. Policy VIII. Suppose that candidate is certified plus is seasoned plus is unionized: then it is fingerprinted. Policy IX. Suppose that candidate is certified plus is freelance: then it has a visa. Policy IV is waived if that candidate has a signing bonus. Policy II is waived if that candidate is freelance. Policy III is waived if that candidate is recommended. Policy I is waived if that candidate is seasoned. Question: Which choice is right for Petra?", "options": ["is fingerprinted", "has a visa", "is eligible", "has a mentor", "is a veteran"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is fingerprinted", "unit_id": "u027566", "pair_id": "u027566-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027566-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9114238e8c61fbbd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a19", "a4", "a7", "a10"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u027580-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is relocating. Rune is seasoned. Rune is probationary. Rune is relocating. Olek is not headhunted. Rune is not sponsored. Rune is not headhunted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is headhunted and also is onboarded, it also is not fingerprinted. Clause 2: once any candidate is relocating and also is not sponsored, it also is eligible. Clause 3: once any candidate is relocating and also is probationary and also is headhunted, it also is not eligible. Clause 4: once any candidate is seasoned and also is sponsored, it also is a veteran. Question: Does it follow that Rune is not eligible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027580", "pair_id": "u027580-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027580-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "fac7b8cb1ad42c75", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u027580-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is relocating. Rune is seasoned. Rune is probationary. Rune is relocating. Olek is not headhunted. Rune is not sponsored. Rune is not headhunted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is headhunted and also is onboarded, it also is not fingerprinted. Clause 2: once any candidate is relocating and also is sponsored, it also is eligible. Clause 3: once any candidate is relocating and also is probationary and also is headhunted, it also is not eligible. Clause 4: once any candidate is seasoned and also is sponsored, it also is a veteran. Question: Does it follow that Rune is not eligible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027580", "pair_id": "u027580-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027580-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "10a14cedcddabf83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u027590-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mads has no portfolio. Mads is relocating. Mads is freelance. Mads is not eligible. Mads is recommended.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is not eligible, it also is not a graduate. Clause 2: once any candidate is recommended, it also has a signing bonus. Clause 3: once any candidate has no visa and also is relocating and also is recommended, it also is certified. Clause 4: once any candidate is not eligible, it also has no visa. Clause 5: once any candidate has no visa and also is not relocating and also is recommended, it also has a diploma. Clause 6: once any candidate has a portfolio and also is freelance, it also is a graduate. Clause 6 overrides Clause 1. Question: Which of these is true of Mads?", "options": ["is certified", "has a diploma"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is certified", "unit_id": "u027590", "pair_id": "u027590-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027590-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e771fa17cf22fe1a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027590-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mads has no portfolio. Mads is not relocating. Mads is freelance. Mads is not eligible. Mads is recommended.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is not eligible, it also is not a graduate. Clause 2: once any candidate is recommended, it also has a signing bonus. Clause 3: once any candidate has no visa and also is relocating and also is recommended, it also is certified. Clause 4: once any candidate is not eligible, it also has no visa. Clause 5: once any candidate has no visa and also is not relocating and also is recommended, it also has a diploma. Clause 6: once any candidate has a portfolio and also is freelance, it also is a graduate. Clause 6 overrides Clause 1. Question: Which of these is true of Mads?", "options": ["is certified", "has a diploma"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a diploma", "unit_id": "u027590", "pair_id": "u027590-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027590-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f2586c92f34a83bf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027590-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mads has no portfolio. Mads is relocating. Mads is freelance. Mads is not eligible. Mads is recommended.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is not eligible, that candidate is not a graduate. Item B. When the candidate is recommended, that candidate has a signing bonus. Item C. When the candidate has no visa, and is relocating, and is recommended, that candidate is certified. Item D. When the candidate is not eligible, that candidate has no visa. Item E. When the candidate has no visa, and is not relocating, and is recommended, that candidate has a diploma. Item F. When the candidate has a portfolio, and is freelance, that candidate is a graduate. Item F outranks Item A. Question: What applies to Mads?", "options": ["is certified", "has a diploma"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is certified", "unit_id": "u027590", "pair_id": "u027590-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027590-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e771fa17cf22fe1a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027590-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mads has no portfolio. Mads is not relocating. Mads is freelance. Mads is not eligible. Mads is recommended.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is not eligible, that candidate is not a graduate. Item B. When the candidate is recommended, that candidate has a signing bonus. Item C. When the candidate has no visa, and is relocating, and is recommended, that candidate is certified. Item D. When the candidate is not eligible, that candidate has no visa. Item E. When the candidate has no visa, and is not relocating, and is recommended, that candidate has a diploma. Item F. When the candidate has a portfolio, and is freelance, that candidate is a graduate. Item F outranks Item A. Question: What applies to Mads?", "options": ["is certified", "has a diploma"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a diploma", "unit_id": "u027590", "pair_id": "u027590-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027590-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f2586c92f34a83bf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a5", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027601-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist has a patch cycle of 68. Shale has a patch cycle of 19. Schist is profiled. Shale is profiled. Galena is profiled. Schist is tested. Shale is not tested. Galena is tagged.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a patch cycle beyond 67, thus it is signed. Provision 2: when the build here is tested, thus it is reverted. Provision 3: when the build here is signed, thus it has a migration script. Provision 4: when the build here is tagged, thus it has a feature toggle. Provision 5: when the build here is profiled, thus it has a security advisory. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here is tagged. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here is tagged. Question: Which one describes Schist?", "options": ["is signed", "has a feature toggle"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is signed", "unit_id": "u027601", "pair_id": "u027601-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027601-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f5353e2fd9c957a7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027601-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist has a patch cycle of 68. Shale has a patch cycle of 19. Schist is profiled. Shale is profiled. Galena is profiled. Schist is tested. Schist is tagged. Shale is not tested. Galena is tagged.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a patch cycle beyond 67, thus it is signed. Provision 2: when the build here is tested, thus it is reverted. Provision 3: when the build here is signed, thus it has a migration script. Provision 4: when the build here is tagged, thus it has a feature toggle. Provision 5: when the build here is profiled, thus it has a security advisory. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here is tagged. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here is tagged. Question: Which one describes Schist?", "options": ["is signed", "has a feature toggle"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a feature toggle", "unit_id": "u027601", "pair_id": "u027601-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027601-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ed27489da273e96f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027601-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist has a patch cycle of 68. Shale has a patch cycle of 19. Schist is profiled. Shale is profiled. Galena is profiled. Schist is tested. Shale is not tested. Galena is tagged.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a patch cycle in excess of 67, it thereby is signed. Point B. If said build is tested, it thereby is reverted. Point C. If said build is signed, it thereby has a migration script. Point D. If said build is tagged, it thereby has a feature toggle. Point E. If said build is profiled, it thereby has a security advisory. Point C is cancelled if said build is tagged. Point A is cancelled if said build is tagged. Question: Which choice is true for Schist?", "options": ["is signed", "has a feature toggle"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is signed", "unit_id": "u027601", "pair_id": "u027601-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027601-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f5353e2fd9c957a7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027601-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist has a patch cycle of 68. Shale has a patch cycle of 19. Schist is profiled. Shale is profiled. Galena is profiled. Schist is tested. Schist is tagged. Shale is not tested. Galena is tagged.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a patch cycle in excess of 67, it thereby is signed. Point B. If said build is tested, it thereby is reverted. Point C. If said build is signed, it thereby has a migration script. Point D. If said build is tagged, it thereby has a feature toggle. Point E. If said build is profiled, it thereby has a security advisory. Point C is cancelled if said build is tagged. Point A is cancelled if said build is tagged. Question: Which choice is true for Schist?", "options": ["is signed", "has a feature toggle"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a feature toggle", "unit_id": "u027601", "pair_id": "u027601-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027601-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ed27489da273e96f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027601-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist has a patch cycle of 68. Shale has a patch cycle of 19. Schist is profiled. Shale is profiled. Galena is profiled. Schist is tested. Shale is not tested. Galena is tagged.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a patch cycle that exceeds 67, so it is signed. No. 2 While the given build is tested, so it is reverted. No. 3 While the given build is signed, so it has a migration script. No. 4 While the given build is tagged, so it has a feature toggle. No. 5 While the given build is profiled, so it has a security advisory. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given build is tagged. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build is tagged. Question: Select what holds for Schist: which option?", "options": ["is signed", "has a feature toggle"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is signed", "unit_id": "u027601", "pair_id": "u027601-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027601-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f5353e2fd9c957a7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027601-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist has a patch cycle of 68. Shale has a patch cycle of 19. Schist is profiled. Shale is profiled. Galena is profiled. Schist is tested. Schist is tagged. Shale is not tested. Galena is tagged.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a patch cycle that exceeds 67, so it is signed. No. 2 While the given build is tested, so it is reverted. No. 3 While the given build is signed, so it has a migration script. No. 4 While the given build is tagged, so it has a feature toggle. No. 5 While the given build is profiled, so it has a security advisory. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given build is tagged. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given build is tagged. Question: Select what holds for Schist: which option?", "options": ["is signed", "has a feature toggle"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a feature toggle", "unit_id": "u027601", "pair_id": "u027601-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027601-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ed27489da273e96f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027611-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is recommended. Noor is not sponsored. Lotte is licensed. Lotte is relocating. Lotte is not sponsored. Noor is not recommended. Lotte is fingerprinted. Noor is fingerprinted. Noor is eligible. Lotte is not eligible.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is onboarded, then it is not certified. (2) If a candidate is onboarded, then it is certified. (3) If a candidate is not recommended, then it is seasoned. (4) If a candidate is not licensed, then it is freelance. (5) If a candidate is relocating, then it has a background screening. (6) If a candidate is not eligible, then it has a signing bonus. (7) If a candidate is seasoned, then it is onboarded. (8) If a candidate is recommended, then it is not seasoned. (1) is void if the candidate is not fingerprinted. (7) is void if the candidate is sponsored. (5) is void if the candidate is licensed. (2) is void if the candidate is relocating. (1) is void if the candidate is not relocating. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. When (8) and (3) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Is it true that Lotte is certified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027611", "pair_id": "u027611-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027611-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d0a0cb545ad81abe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u027611-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is recommended. Noor is not sponsored. Lotte is licensed. Lotte is relocating. Lotte is not sponsored. Noor is not recommended. Lotte is fingerprinted. Noor is fingerprinted. Noor is eligible. Lotte is not eligible.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is onboarded, then it is not certified. (2) If a candidate is onboarded, then it is certified. (3) If a candidate is not recommended, then it is seasoned. (4) If a candidate is not licensed, then it is freelance. (5) If a candidate is relocating, then it has a background screening. (6) If a candidate is eligible, then it has a signing bonus. (7) If a candidate is seasoned, then it is onboarded. (8) If a candidate is recommended, then it is not seasoned. (1) is void if the candidate is not fingerprinted. (7) is void if the candidate is sponsored. (5) is void if the candidate is licensed. (2) is void if the candidate is relocating. (1) is void if the candidate is not relocating. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. When (8) and (3) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Is it true that Lotte is certified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027611", "pair_id": "u027611-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027611-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4e2507fffbcb2abe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u027611-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is recommended. Noor is not sponsored. Lotte is licensed. Lotte is relocating. Lotte is not sponsored. Noor is not recommended. Lotte is fingerprinted. Noor is fingerprinted. Noor is eligible. Lotte is not eligible.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is onboarded, it also is not certified. Clause 2: once any candidate is onboarded, it also is certified. Clause 3: once any candidate is not recommended, it also is seasoned. Clause 4: once any candidate is not licensed, it also is freelance. Clause 5: once any candidate is relocating, it also has a background screening. Clause 6: once any candidate is not eligible, it also has a signing bonus. Clause 7: once any candidate is seasoned, it also is onboarded. Clause 8: once any candidate is recommended, it also is not seasoned. Clause 1 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is not fingerprinted. Clause 7 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is sponsored. Clause 5 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is licensed. Clause 2 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is relocating. Clause 1 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is not relocating. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Clause 8 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Lotte is certified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027611", "pair_id": "u027611-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027611-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d0a0cb545ad81abe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u027611-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is recommended. Noor is not sponsored. Lotte is licensed. Lotte is relocating. Lotte is not sponsored. Noor is not recommended. Lotte is fingerprinted. Noor is fingerprinted. Noor is eligible. Lotte is not eligible.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is onboarded, it also is not certified. Clause 2: once any candidate is onboarded, it also is certified. Clause 3: once any candidate is not recommended, it also is seasoned. Clause 4: once any candidate is not licensed, it also is freelance. Clause 5: once any candidate is relocating, it also has a background screening. Clause 6: once any candidate is eligible, it also has a signing bonus. Clause 7: once any candidate is seasoned, it also is onboarded. Clause 8: once any candidate is recommended, it also is not seasoned. Clause 1 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is not fingerprinted. Clause 7 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is sponsored. Clause 5 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is licensed. Clause 2 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is relocating. Clause 1 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is not relocating. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Clause 8 overrides Clause 3. Question: Does it follow that Lotte is certified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027611", "pair_id": "u027611-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027611-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4e2507fffbcb2abe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u027614-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bastien has no lien. Ilse is not refinanced. Ilse has no lien. Bastien is delinquent. Bastien is not refinanced.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is pensioned provided that it has no lien. Section 2: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it is underwritten. Section 3: a borrower has a guarantor provided that it is not delinquent. Section 4: a borrower is foreclosed provided that it has a cosigner. Section 5: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it has a lien. Section 6: a borrower is underwritten provided that it is refinanced. Section 7: a borrower has collateral provided that it is pensioned. Question: Which statement fits Bastien?", "options": ["has collateral", "has an escrow account", "is foreclosed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u027614", "pair_id": "u027614-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027614-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "9d854a5615aeac6a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a9", "a2"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u027614-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Bastien has a lien. Ilse is not refinanced. Ilse has no lien. Bastien is delinquent. Bastien is not refinanced.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is pensioned provided that it has no lien. Section 2: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it is underwritten. Section 3: a borrower has a guarantor provided that it is not delinquent. Section 4: a borrower is foreclosed provided that it has a cosigner. Section 5: a borrower has a cosigner provided that it has a lien. Section 6: a borrower is underwritten provided that it is refinanced. Section 7: a borrower has collateral provided that it is pensioned. Question: Which statement fits Bastien?", "options": ["has collateral", "has an escrow account", "is foreclosed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is foreclosed", "unit_id": "u027614", "pair_id": "u027614-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027614-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "99aef95c595e02c2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a9", "a2"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u027622-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jory is not labeled. Jory is palletized. Quentin is not labeled. Jory is not stamped. Jory has a parcel volume of 85. Quentin is not stamped. Quentin has a parcel volume of 37. Quentin is palletized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is not palletized, thus it is not damaged. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a parcel volume beyond 14, thus it has no locker slot. Provision 3: when the parcel here has no locker slot, thus it is registered. Provision 4: when the parcel here is registered while is stamped, thus it is not consolidated. Provision 5: when the parcel here is registered while is not stamped, thus it is consolidated. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is labeled. Question: Would it be right to say that Quentin is not consolidated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027622", "pair_id": "u027622-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027622-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6ecd076bb91e6c34", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 36}}
{"id": "syn-u027622-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jory is not labeled. Jory is palletized. Quentin is labeled. Jory is not stamped. Jory has a parcel volume of 85. Quentin is not stamped. Quentin has a parcel volume of 37. Quentin is palletized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is not palletized, thus it is not damaged. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a parcel volume beyond 14, thus it has no locker slot. Provision 3: when the parcel here has no locker slot, thus it is registered. Provision 4: when the parcel here is registered while is stamped, thus it is not consolidated. Provision 5: when the parcel here is registered while is not stamped, thus it is consolidated. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here is labeled. Question: Would it be right to say that Quentin is not consolidated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027622", "pair_id": "u027622-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027622-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "aba16b30d840d2b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 36}}
{"id": "syn-u027622-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jory is not labeled. Jory is palletized. Quentin is not labeled. Jory is not stamped. Jory has a parcel volume of 85. Quentin is not stamped. Quentin has a parcel volume of 37. Quentin is palletized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not palletized, it thereby is not damaged. Point B. If said parcel has a parcel volume in excess of 14, it thereby has no locker slot. Point C. If said parcel has no locker slot, it thereby is registered. Point D. If said parcel is registered and further is stamped, it thereby is not consolidated. Point E. If said parcel is registered and further is not stamped, it thereby is consolidated. Point B is cancelled if said parcel is labeled. Question: Statement: Quentin is not consolidated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027622", "pair_id": "u027622-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027622-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6ecd076bb91e6c34", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 36}}
{"id": "syn-u027622-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jory is not labeled. Jory is palletized. Quentin is labeled. Jory is not stamped. Jory has a parcel volume of 85. Quentin is not stamped. Quentin has a parcel volume of 37. Quentin is palletized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not palletized, it thereby is not damaged. Point B. If said parcel has a parcel volume in excess of 14, it thereby has no locker slot. Point C. If said parcel has no locker slot, it thereby is registered. Point D. If said parcel is registered and further is stamped, it thereby is not consolidated. Point E. If said parcel is registered and further is not stamped, it thereby is consolidated. Point B is cancelled if said parcel is labeled. Question: Statement: Quentin is not consolidated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027622", "pair_id": "u027622-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027622-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "aba16b30d840d2b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 36}}
{"id": "syn-u027637-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not documented. Quartz has a patch cycle of 66. Galena has a patch cycle of 82. Zircon is not reverted. Quartz is not experimental. Zircon has a lint backlog of 75. Quartz is not documented. Quartz is not reverted. Galena is documented. Galena has a lint backlog of 30.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is tested provided that it is documented. Section 2: a build is profiled provided that it is tested as well as has a patch cycle lower than 25 as well as is documented. Section 3: a build is not compiled provided that it is experimental. Section 4: a build is not profiled provided that it is tested as well as has a patch cycle of 25 or higher as well as is documented. Section 3 lapses for a build if it has a patch cycle exceeding 43. Section 2 lapses for a build if it has a lint backlog of 68 or lower as well as is reverted. Question: Galena is not profiled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027637", "pair_id": "u027637-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027637-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3a31f153f760c750", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027637-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not documented. Quartz has a patch cycle of 66. Galena has a patch cycle of 82. Zircon is not reverted. Quartz is not experimental. Zircon has a lint backlog of 75. Quartz is not documented. Quartz is not reverted. Galena is not documented. Galena has a lint backlog of 30.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is tested provided that it is documented. Section 2: a build is profiled provided that it is tested as well as has a patch cycle lower than 25 as well as is documented. Section 3: a build is not compiled provided that it is experimental. Section 4: a build is not profiled provided that it is tested as well as has a patch cycle of 25 or higher as well as is documented. Section 3 lapses for a build if it has a patch cycle exceeding 43. Section 2 lapses for a build if it has a lint backlog of 68 or lower as well as is reverted. Question: Galena is not profiled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027637", "pair_id": "u027637-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027637-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4f7233ecb83e15b5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027637-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not documented. Quartz has a patch cycle of 66. Galena has a patch cycle of 82. Zircon is not reverted. Quartz is not experimental. Zircon has a lint backlog of 75. Quartz is not documented. Quartz is not reverted. Galena is documented. Galena has a lint backlog of 30.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is documented, it then is tested. #2 Each time a build is tested and additionally has a patch cycle less than 25 and additionally is documented, it then is profiled. #3 Each time a build is experimental, it then is not compiled. #4 Each time a build is tested and additionally has a patch cycle of 25 or above and additionally is documented, it then is not profiled. #3 is set aside if a build has a patch cycle greater than 43. #2 is set aside if a build has a lint backlog of 68 or below and additionally is reverted. Question: Do the terms above show that Galena is not profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027637", "pair_id": "u027637-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027637-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3a31f153f760c750", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027637-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is not documented. Quartz has a patch cycle of 66. Galena has a patch cycle of 82. Zircon is not reverted. Quartz is not experimental. Zircon has a lint backlog of 75. Quartz is not documented. Quartz is not reverted. Galena is not documented. Galena has a lint backlog of 30.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is documented, it then is tested. #2 Each time a build is tested and additionally has a patch cycle less than 25 and additionally is documented, it then is profiled. #3 Each time a build is experimental, it then is not compiled. #4 Each time a build is tested and additionally has a patch cycle of 25 or above and additionally is documented, it then is not profiled. #3 is set aside if a build has a patch cycle greater than 43. #2 is set aside if a build has a lint backlog of 68 or below and additionally is reverted. Question: Do the terms above show that Galena is not profiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027637", "pair_id": "u027637-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027637-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4f7233ecb83e15b5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027641-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aldebaran is not preregistered. Aldebaran is not budgeted. Aldebaran is embargoed. Aldebaran has no seed funding. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Aldebaran has a steering committee. Capella is not multicenter. Capella is not collaborative. Capella has seed funding. Mirach is endorsed. Capella has a steering committee. Mirach is not interdisciplinary. Aldebaran is collaborative. Aldebaran is not interdisciplinary. Capella is not embargoed. Mirach has seed funding.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has no steering committee, it also is longitudinal. Clause 2: once any proposal has no seed funding, it also has no postdoc. Clause 3: once any proposal is collaborative, it also has no patent filing. Clause 4: once any proposal is not preregistered, it also has ethics clearance. Clause 5: once any proposal is embargoed, it also is resubmitted. Clause 6: once any proposal is not budgeted, it also has a postdoc. Clause 7: once any proposal has no steering committee, it also has no industry backing. Clause 8: once any proposal has a steering committee, it also is not translational. Clause 9: once any proposal is interdisciplinary, it also is translational. Clause 10: once any proposal is not collaborative, it also has industry backing. Clause 11: once any proposal is budgeted, it also is renewed. Clause 12: once any proposal is preregistered, it also has a patent filing. Clause 13: once any proposal is not collaborative, it also is not exploratory. Clause 14: once any proposal is endorsed, it also is exploratory. Clause 10 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not multicenter. Clause 5 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not budgeted. Clause 13 overrides Clause 14. Clause 8 overrides Clause 9. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 7 overrides Clause 10. Clause 12 overrides Clause 3. Question: Which of these is true of Aldebaran?", "options": ["is renewed", "has a patent filing", "has ethics clearance", "has a postdoc", "is longitudinal", "has industry backing"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has ethics clearance", "unit_id": "u027641", "pair_id": "u027641-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027641-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6149148e788ef7df", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a3", "a7", "a0", "a16", "a5", "a13"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u027641-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aldebaran is preregistered. Aldebaran is not budgeted. Aldebaran is embargoed. Aldebaran has no seed funding. Aldebaran is not multicenter. Aldebaran has a steering committee. Capella is not multicenter. Capella is not collaborative. Capella has seed funding. Mirach is endorsed. Capella has a steering committee. Mirach is not interdisciplinary. Aldebaran is collaborative. Aldebaran is not interdisciplinary. Capella is not embargoed. Mirach has seed funding.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has no steering committee, it also is longitudinal. Clause 2: once any proposal has no seed funding, it also has no postdoc. Clause 3: once any proposal is collaborative, it also has no patent filing. Clause 4: once any proposal is not preregistered, it also has ethics clearance. Clause 5: once any proposal is embargoed, it also is resubmitted. Clause 6: once any proposal is not budgeted, it also has a postdoc. Clause 7: once any proposal has no steering committee, it also has no industry backing. Clause 8: once any proposal has a steering committee, it also is not translational. Clause 9: once any proposal is interdisciplinary, it also is translational. Clause 10: once any proposal is not collaborative, it also has industry backing. Clause 11: once any proposal is budgeted, it also is renewed. Clause 12: once any proposal is preregistered, it also has a patent filing. Clause 13: once any proposal is not collaborative, it also is not exploratory. Clause 14: once any proposal is endorsed, it also is exploratory. Clause 10 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not multicenter. Clause 5 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is not budgeted. Clause 13 overrides Clause 14. Clause 8 overrides Clause 9. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 7 overrides Clause 10. Clause 12 overrides Clause 3. Question: Which of these is true of Aldebaran?", "options": ["is renewed", "has a patent filing", "has ethics clearance", "has a postdoc", "is longitudinal", "has industry backing"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a patent filing", "unit_id": "u027641", "pair_id": "u027641-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027641-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b46a9c4468b8d89b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a3", "a7", "a0", "a16", "a5", "a13"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u027687-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kestrel is not idle. Kestrel has a CPU quota of 87. Zephyr is not idle.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is not replicated, that workload is patched. Item B. When the workload is not isolated, that workload is not mirrored. Item C. When the workload is not cached, that workload is deprecated. Item D. When the workload is backed up, that workload is sandboxed. Item E. When the workload is not mirrored, that workload is throttled. Item F. When the workload is deprecated, that workload has a failover node. Item G. When the workload has a CPU quota of no less than 21, that workload is not replicated. Item H. When the workload is patched, that workload is monitored. Item E is suspended when the workload is isolated. Item D is suspended when the workload is isolated. Item A is suspended when the workload is not cached. Item H is suspended when the workload is not idle. Question: What applies to Kestrel?", "options": ["is patched", "is throttled", "has a failover node"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is patched", "unit_id": "u027687", "pair_id": "u027687-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027687-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9b5dace33dbcf52b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a11", "a6", "a4"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u027687-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kestrel is not idle. Kestrel has a CPU quota of 87. Zephyr is not idle. Kestrel is not cached.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is not replicated, that workload is patched. Item B. When the workload is not isolated, that workload is not mirrored. Item C. When the workload is not cached, that workload is deprecated. Item D. When the workload is backed up, that workload is sandboxed. Item E. When the workload is not mirrored, that workload is throttled. Item F. When the workload is deprecated, that workload has a failover node. Item G. When the workload has a CPU quota of no less than 21, that workload is not replicated. Item H. When the workload is patched, that workload is monitored. Item E is suspended when the workload is isolated. Item D is suspended when the workload is isolated. Item A is suspended when the workload is not cached. Item H is suspended when the workload is not idle. Question: What applies to Kestrel?", "options": ["is patched", "is throttled", "has a failover node"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a failover node", "unit_id": "u027687", "pair_id": "u027687-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027687-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2d089834fe60e1f0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a11", "a6", "a4"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u027688-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is lapsed. Agata is retired. Agata has roadside assistance. Agata is not litigated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it is not subrogated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is litigated, thus it is covered. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is inspected. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is lapsed, thus it has a dashcam. Question: Would it be right to say that Agata is not subrogated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027688", "pair_id": "u027688-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027688-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "63327518c73019a6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u027688-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is lapsed. Agata is retired. Agata has roadside assistance. Agata is not litigated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it is not subrogated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is litigated, thus it is covered. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it is inspected. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it is subrogated. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is lapsed, thus it has a dashcam. Question: Would it be right to say that Agata is not subrogated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027688", "pair_id": "u027688-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027688-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "ec72d89d6cc230ec", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u027693-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is shortlisted. Hadar is not renewed. Hadar has a milestone total of 38. Aldebaran has a review mark of 93. Hadar has no steering committee. Mirach has a review mark of 86. Hadar has a citation index of 15. Mirach is renewed. Betelgeuse is not renewed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has seed funding provided that it has a field site as well as has a milestone total of 36 or lower. Section 2: a proposal is budgeted provided that it has a field site as well as has a milestone total exceeding 36. Section 3: a proposal is resubmitted provided that it has a field site as well as has a review mark lower than 47. Section 4: a proposal has a field site provided that it is preregistered. Section 5: a proposal has a patent filing provided that it has a steering committee. Section 6: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it has a field site as well as is renewed as well as is theoretical. Section 7: a proposal is endorsed provided that it has a field site as well as has a review mark of 47 or higher. Section 8: a proposal is translational provided that it has a field site as well as has industry backing. Section 9: a proposal is preregistered provided that it is shortlisted. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it has industry backing. Section 7 lapses for a proposal if it has a citation index of 53 or lower. Section 6 lapses for a proposal if it has industry backing. Question: Which statement fits Hadar?", "options": ["has seed funding", "is resubmitted", "is translational", "is budgeted", "is endorsed", "is longitudinal"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is budgeted", "unit_id": "u027693", "pair_id": "u027693-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027693-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "031e432be21ef0c3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a13", "a5", "a14", "a8", "a1", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027693-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is shortlisted. Hadar is not renewed. Hadar has a milestone total of 38. Hadar has industry backing. Aldebaran has a review mark of 93. Hadar has no steering committee. Mirach has a review mark of 86. Hadar has a citation index of 15. Mirach is renewed. Betelgeuse is not renewed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has seed funding provided that it has a field site as well as has a milestone total of 36 or lower. Section 2: a proposal is budgeted provided that it has a field site as well as has a milestone total exceeding 36. Section 3: a proposal is resubmitted provided that it has a field site as well as has a review mark lower than 47. Section 4: a proposal has a field site provided that it is preregistered. Section 5: a proposal has a patent filing provided that it has a steering committee. Section 6: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it has a field site as well as is renewed as well as is theoretical. Section 7: a proposal is endorsed provided that it has a field site as well as has a review mark of 47 or higher. Section 8: a proposal is translational provided that it has a field site as well as has industry backing. Section 9: a proposal is preregistered provided that it is shortlisted. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it has industry backing. Section 7 lapses for a proposal if it has a citation index of 53 or lower. Section 6 lapses for a proposal if it has industry backing. Question: Which statement fits Hadar?", "options": ["has seed funding", "is resubmitted", "is translational", "is budgeted", "is endorsed", "is longitudinal"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is translational", "unit_id": "u027693", "pair_id": "u027693-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027693-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b9893eceb1287f10", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a13", "a5", "a14", "a8", "a1", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027693-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is shortlisted. Hadar is not renewed. Hadar has a milestone total of 38. Aldebaran has a review mark of 93. Hadar has no steering committee. Mirach has a review mark of 86. Hadar has a citation index of 15. Mirach is renewed. Betelgeuse is not renewed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has a field site and additionally has a milestone total of 36 or below, it then has seed funding. #2 Each time a proposal has a field site and additionally has a milestone total greater than 36, it then is budgeted. #3 Each time a proposal has a field site and additionally has a review mark less than 47, it then is resubmitted. #4 Each time a proposal is preregistered, it then has a field site. #5 Each time a proposal has a steering committee, it then has a patent filing. #6 Each time a proposal has a field site and additionally is renewed and additionally is theoretical, it then is longitudinal. #7 Each time a proposal has a field site and additionally has a review mark of 47 or above, it then is endorsed. #8 Each time a proposal has a field site and additionally has industry backing, it then is translational. #9 Each time a proposal is shortlisted, it then is preregistered. #2 is set aside if a proposal has industry backing. #7 is set aside if a proposal has a citation index of 53 or below. #6 is set aside if a proposal has industry backing. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Hadar?", "options": ["has seed funding", "is resubmitted", "is translational", "is budgeted", "is endorsed", "is longitudinal"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is budgeted", "unit_id": "u027693", "pair_id": "u027693-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027693-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "031e432be21ef0c3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a13", "a5", "a14", "a8", "a1", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027693-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is shortlisted. Hadar is not renewed. Hadar has a milestone total of 38. Hadar has industry backing. Aldebaran has a review mark of 93. Hadar has no steering committee. Mirach has a review mark of 86. Hadar has a citation index of 15. Mirach is renewed. Betelgeuse is not renewed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has a field site and additionally has a milestone total of 36 or below, it then has seed funding. #2 Each time a proposal has a field site and additionally has a milestone total greater than 36, it then is budgeted. #3 Each time a proposal has a field site and additionally has a review mark less than 47, it then is resubmitted. #4 Each time a proposal is preregistered, it then has a field site. #5 Each time a proposal has a steering committee, it then has a patent filing. #6 Each time a proposal has a field site and additionally is renewed and additionally is theoretical, it then is longitudinal. #7 Each time a proposal has a field site and additionally has a review mark of 47 or above, it then is endorsed. #8 Each time a proposal has a field site and additionally has industry backing, it then is translational. #9 Each time a proposal is shortlisted, it then is preregistered. #2 is set aside if a proposal has industry backing. #7 is set aside if a proposal has a citation index of 53 or below. #6 is set aside if a proposal has industry backing. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Hadar?", "options": ["has seed funding", "is resubmitted", "is translational", "is budgeted", "is endorsed", "is longitudinal"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is translational", "unit_id": "u027693", "pair_id": "u027693-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027693-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b9893eceb1287f10", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a13", "a5", "a14", "a8", "a1", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027722-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is reproducible. Pumice is not benchmarked. Pumice is fuzzed. Pumice is not linted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has no feature toggle, that build is minified. Item B. When the build is not fuzzed, that build is not minified. Item C. When the build is minified, that build is not experimental. Item D. When the build is linted, that build is not localized. Item E. When the build is not benchmarked, that build is localized. Item F. When the build is minified, that build is experimental. Item G. When the build is versioned, that build is not documented. Item H. When the build is not reproducible, that build has a feature toggle. Item I. When the build is not linted, that build has no feature toggle. Item E is suspended when the build is not reproducible. Item F is suspended when the build is not benchmarked. Item C is suspended when the build is benchmarked. Item C is suspended when the build is not notarized. Item G is suspended when the build is not fuzzed. Item H outranks Item I. Item D outranks Item E. Item A outranks Item B. Item F outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Pumice is experimental?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027722", "pair_id": "u027722-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027722-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a7b78febaebc5454", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u027722-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is reproducible. Pumice is not benchmarked. Pumice is fuzzed. Pumice is not linted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has no feature toggle, that build is minified. Item B. When the build is not fuzzed, that build is not minified. Item C. When the build is minified, that build is not experimental. Item D. When the build is linted, that build is not localized. Item E. When the build is benchmarked, that build is localized. Item F. When the build is minified, that build is experimental. Item G. When the build is versioned, that build is not documented. Item H. When the build is not reproducible, that build has a feature toggle. Item I. When the build is not linted, that build has no feature toggle. Item E is suspended when the build is not reproducible. Item F is suspended when the build is not benchmarked. Item C is suspended when the build is benchmarked. Item C is suspended when the build is not notarized. Item G is suspended when the build is not fuzzed. Item H outranks Item I. Item D outranks Item E. Item A outranks Item B. Item F outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Pumice is experimental?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027722", "pair_id": "u027722-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027722-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d1cc13aadc732208", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u027735-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has collateral. Hamid has an escrow account. Ingrid is employed. Hamid has no collateral. Corin has a risk tier of 4. Hamid is overdrawn. Ingrid has a credit rating of 19. Ingrid has collateral. Wiebke has an escrow account. Ingrid is not amortized. Wiebke has no collateral. Ingrid is overdrawn. Hamid is not employed. Hamid is not amortized. Wiebke is not overdrawn. Corin is not employed. Corin has a credit rating of 34. Wiebke is employed. Hamid has a risk tier of 94. Hamid is garnished.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has a risk tier beneath 78 while is overdrawn, thus it has a guarantor. Provision 2: when the borrower here is employed while has collateral while is amortized, thus it is prequalified. Provision 3: when the borrower here is not employed while has no collateral, thus it is not prequalified. Provision 4: when the borrower here is not garnished while has no collateral, thus it is not refinanced. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here has a credit rating at or above 29 while has an escrow account. Provision 4 has no effect when the borrower here has a credit rating at or above 77. Question: Would it be right to say that Hamid is prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027735", "pair_id": "u027735-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027735-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d5944c380b1b83b6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027735-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has collateral. Hamid has an escrow account. Ingrid is employed. Hamid has no collateral. Corin has a risk tier of 4. Hamid is overdrawn. Ingrid has a credit rating of 19. Ingrid has collateral. Wiebke has an escrow account. Ingrid is not amortized. Wiebke has no collateral. Ingrid is overdrawn. Hamid is not employed. Hamid is not amortized. Wiebke is not overdrawn. Corin is not employed. Corin has a credit rating of 34. Wiebke is employed. Hamid has a risk tier of 94. Hamid is garnished.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has a risk tier beneath 78 while is overdrawn, thus it has a guarantor. Provision 2: when the borrower here is employed while has collateral while is amortized, thus it is prequalified. Provision 3: when the borrower here is employed while has no collateral, thus it is not prequalified. Provision 4: when the borrower here is not garnished while has no collateral, thus it is not refinanced. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here has a credit rating at or above 29 while has an escrow account. Provision 4 has no effect when the borrower here has a credit rating at or above 77. Question: Would it be right to say that Hamid is prequalified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027735", "pair_id": "u027735-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027735-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b0aae3a1dc5c456d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027735-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has collateral. Hamid has an escrow account. Ingrid is employed. Hamid has no collateral. Corin has a risk tier of 4. Hamid is overdrawn. Ingrid has a credit rating of 19. Ingrid has collateral. Wiebke has an escrow account. Ingrid is not amortized. Wiebke has no collateral. Ingrid is overdrawn. Hamid is not employed. Hamid is not amortized. Wiebke is not overdrawn. Corin is not employed. Corin has a credit rating of 34. Wiebke is employed. Hamid has a risk tier of 94. Hamid is garnished.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has a risk tier short of 78 and further is overdrawn, it thereby has a guarantor. Point B. If said borrower is employed and further has collateral and further is amortized, it thereby is prequalified. Point C. If said borrower is not employed and further has no collateral, it thereby is not prequalified. Point D. If said borrower is not garnished and further has no collateral, it thereby is not refinanced. Point C is cancelled if said borrower has a credit rating of minimum 29 and further has an escrow account. Point D is cancelled if said borrower has a credit rating of minimum 77. Question: Statement: Hamid is prequalified. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027735", "pair_id": "u027735-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027735-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d5944c380b1b83b6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027735-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has collateral. Hamid has an escrow account. Ingrid is employed. Hamid has no collateral. Corin has a risk tier of 4. Hamid is overdrawn. Ingrid has a credit rating of 19. Ingrid has collateral. Wiebke has an escrow account. Ingrid is not amortized. Wiebke has no collateral. Ingrid is overdrawn. Hamid is not employed. Hamid is not amortized. Wiebke is not overdrawn. Corin is not employed. Corin has a credit rating of 34. Wiebke is employed. Hamid has a risk tier of 94. Hamid is garnished.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has a risk tier short of 78 and further is overdrawn, it thereby has a guarantor. Point B. If said borrower is employed and further has collateral and further is amortized, it thereby is prequalified. Point C. If said borrower is employed and further has no collateral, it thereby is not prequalified. Point D. If said borrower is not garnished and further has no collateral, it thereby is not refinanced. Point C is cancelled if said borrower has a credit rating of minimum 29 and further has an escrow account. Point D is cancelled if said borrower has a credit rating of minimum 77. Question: Statement: Hamid is prequalified. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027735", "pair_id": "u027735-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027735-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b0aae3a1dc5c456d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027735-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has collateral. Hamid has an escrow account. Ingrid is employed. Hamid has no collateral. Corin has a risk tier of 4. Hamid is overdrawn. Ingrid has a credit rating of 19. Ingrid has collateral. Wiebke has an escrow account. Ingrid is not amortized. Wiebke has no collateral. Ingrid is overdrawn. Hamid is not employed. Hamid is not amortized. Wiebke is not overdrawn. Corin is not employed. Corin has a credit rating of 34. Wiebke is employed. Hamid has a risk tier of 94. Hamid is garnished.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has a risk tier that falls below 78 and likewise is overdrawn, so it has a guarantor. No. 2 While the given borrower is employed and likewise has collateral and likewise is amortized, so it is prequalified. No. 3 While the given borrower is not employed and likewise has no collateral, so it is not prequalified. No. 4 While the given borrower is not garnished and likewise has no collateral, so it is not refinanced. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a credit rating not below 29 and likewise has an escrow account. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a credit rating not below 77. Question: Is the claim \"Hamid is prequalified\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027735", "pair_id": "u027735-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027735-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d5944c380b1b83b6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027735-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has collateral. Hamid has an escrow account. Ingrid is employed. Hamid has no collateral. Corin has a risk tier of 4. Hamid is overdrawn. Ingrid has a credit rating of 19. Ingrid has collateral. Wiebke has an escrow account. Ingrid is not amortized. Wiebke has no collateral. Ingrid is overdrawn. Hamid is not employed. Hamid is not amortized. Wiebke is not overdrawn. Corin is not employed. Corin has a credit rating of 34. Wiebke is employed. Hamid has a risk tier of 94. Hamid is garnished.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has a risk tier that falls below 78 and likewise is overdrawn, so it has a guarantor. No. 2 While the given borrower is employed and likewise has collateral and likewise is amortized, so it is prequalified. No. 3 While the given borrower is employed and likewise has no collateral, so it is not prequalified. No. 4 While the given borrower is not garnished and likewise has no collateral, so it is not refinanced. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a credit rating not below 29 and likewise has an escrow account. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a credit rating not below 77. Question: Is the claim \"Hamid is prequalified\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027735", "pair_id": "u027735-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027735-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b0aae3a1dc5c456d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u027795-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist has a changelog. Schist is not versioned. Schist is not tagged. Schist is not documented.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is linted provided that it is not versioned. Section 2: a build is merged provided that it is reverted. Section 3: a build is benchmarked provided that it has a changelog. Section 4: a build is reproducible provided that it is not benchmarked. Section 5: a build is experimental provided that it is not tagged. Section 6: a build is not benchmarked provided that it is backported. Section 7: a build is reverted provided that it is linted. Section 8: a build has a feature toggle provided that it is reproducible. Section 9: a build is not experimental provided that it is versioned. Section 10: a build is not linted provided that it is documented. Section 11: a build is not localized provided that it is not backported. Section 5 lapses for a build if it is versioned. Section 8 lapses for a build if it is not versioned. Section 11 lapses for a build if it is documented. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Which statement fits Schist?", "options": ["is merged", "has a feature toggle"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is merged", "unit_id": "u027795", "pair_id": "u027795-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027795-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "209669bf61503577", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u027795-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Schist has a changelog. Schist is backported. Schist is not versioned. Schist is not tagged. Schist is not documented.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is linted provided that it is not versioned. Section 2: a build is merged provided that it is reverted. Section 3: a build is benchmarked provided that it has a changelog. Section 4: a build is reproducible provided that it is not benchmarked. Section 5: a build is experimental provided that it is not tagged. Section 6: a build is not benchmarked provided that it is backported. Section 7: a build is reverted provided that it is linted. Section 8: a build has a feature toggle provided that it is reproducible. Section 9: a build is not experimental provided that it is versioned. Section 10: a build is not linted provided that it is documented. Section 11: a build is not localized provided that it is not backported. Section 5 lapses for a build if it is versioned. Section 8 lapses for a build if it is not versioned. Section 11 lapses for a build if it is documented. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Which statement fits Schist?", "options": ["is merged", "has a feature toggle"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is merged", "unit_id": "u027795", "pair_id": "u027795-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027795-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0553a252ff76e7eb", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a5"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u027869-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not headhunted. Petra is headhunted. Mads has a seniority step of 1. Petra is recommended.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has no portfolio, it thereby has a background screening. Point B. If said candidate is a graduate, it thereby is fingerprinted. Point C. If said candidate is fingerprinted, it thereby is probationary. Point D. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is not probationary. Point E. If said candidate is not headhunted, it thereby is certified. Point F. If said candidate is recommended, it thereby is a graduate. Question: Statement: Mads is probationary. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027869", "pair_id": "u027869-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027869-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "50825d78052b3bf2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027869-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mads is not headhunted. Petra is headhunted. Mads has a seniority step of 1. Petra is recommended.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a seniority step short of 10, it thereby has no portfolio. Point B. If said candidate has no portfolio, it thereby has a background screening. Point C. If said candidate is a graduate, it thereby is fingerprinted. Point D. If said candidate is fingerprinted, it thereby is probationary. Point E. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is not probationary. Point F. If said candidate is not headhunted, it thereby is certified. Point G. If said candidate is recommended, it thereby is a graduate. Question: Statement: Mads is probationary. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027869", "pair_id": "u027869-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027869-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "4e44827be35cfd5e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027906-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has a risk tier of 30. Bastien is not indebted. Bastien is not refinanced. Ingrid is not refinanced. Hamid has a risk tier of 69. Bastien is foreclosed. Hamid is indebted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no escrow account provided that it is not underwritten. Section 2: a borrower is not vetted provided that it has an escrow account. Section 3: a borrower is not solvent provided that it is indebted. Section 4: a borrower is not underwritten provided that it is not refinanced. Section 5: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it is not overdrawn. Section 6: a borrower is not overdrawn provided that it has a risk tier of 71 or higher. Question: Bastien has no escrow account. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027906", "pair_id": "u027906-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027906-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5a3269542d59213e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027906-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has a risk tier of 30. Bastien is not indebted. Bastien is not refinanced. Ingrid is not refinanced. Hamid has a risk tier of 69. Bastien is foreclosed. Hamid is indebted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower has no escrow account provided that it is not underwritten. Section 2: a borrower is not vetted provided that it has an escrow account. Section 3: a borrower is not solvent provided that it is indebted. Section 4: a borrower is not underwritten provided that it is not refinanced. Section 5: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it is not overdrawn. Section 6: a borrower is not overdrawn provided that it has a risk tier of 71 or higher. Section 7: a borrower is not audited provided that it is foreclosed. Question: Bastien has no escrow account. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027906", "pair_id": "u027906-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027906-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "04dc505464ef3fa3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027906-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has a risk tier of 30. Bastien is not indebted. Bastien is not refinanced. Ingrid is not refinanced. Hamid has a risk tier of 69. Bastien is foreclosed. Hamid is indebted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is not underwritten: then it has no escrow account. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is not vetted. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is indebted: then it is not solvent. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is not refinanced: then it is not underwritten. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is not overdrawn: then it has an escrow account. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower has a risk tier no lower than 71: then it is not overdrawn. Question: Is it so that Bastien has no escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027906", "pair_id": "u027906-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027906-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5a3269542d59213e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027906-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has a risk tier of 30. Bastien is not indebted. Bastien is not refinanced. Ingrid is not refinanced. Hamid has a risk tier of 69. Bastien is foreclosed. Hamid is indebted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is not underwritten: then it has no escrow account. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has an escrow account: then it is not vetted. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is indebted: then it is not solvent. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is not refinanced: then it is not underwritten. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is not overdrawn: then it has an escrow account. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower has a risk tier no lower than 71: then it is not overdrawn. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is foreclosed: then it is not audited. Question: Is it so that Bastien has no escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u027906", "pair_id": "u027906-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027906-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "04dc505464ef3fa3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027909-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver has no adjuster. Xaver has a premium discount. Xaver is appraised. Xaver is not uninsurable. Xaver is not lapsed. Xaver is inspected.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a rider, thus it is bundled. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a premium discount, thus it is a smoker. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is not subrogated. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a rider, thus it is not bundled. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has an adjuster, thus it is not a smoker. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is not uninsurable, thus it has no rider. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is a smoker, thus it has a rider. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is lapsed, thus it is not grandfathered. Provision 2 has no effect when the policyholder here has a beneficiary. Provision 6 has no effect when the policyholder here is inspected. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here has a beneficiary. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here is appraised. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Would it be right to say that Xaver is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027909", "pair_id": "u027909-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027909-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "98ec94e3f57ed40b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027909-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver has no adjuster. Xaver has a premium discount. Xaver is appraised. Xaver is not uninsurable. Xaver is not lapsed. Xaver is inspected.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a rider, thus it is bundled. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a premium discount, thus it is a smoker. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is not subrogated. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a rider, thus it is not bundled. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has an adjuster, thus it is not a smoker. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is uninsurable, thus it has no rider. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is a smoker, thus it has a rider. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is lapsed, thus it is not grandfathered. Provision 2 has no effect when the policyholder here has a beneficiary. Provision 6 has no effect when the policyholder here is inspected. Provision 5 has no effect when the policyholder here has a beneficiary. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here is appraised. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 8. Question: Would it be right to say that Xaver is bundled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027909", "pair_id": "u027909-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027909-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "44a8d51ac92b17de", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027909-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver has no adjuster. Xaver has a premium discount. Xaver is appraised. Xaver is not uninsurable. Xaver is not lapsed. Xaver is inspected.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a rider, so it is bundled. No. 2 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is grandfathered. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a premium discount, so it is a smoker. No. 4 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is not subrogated. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a rider, so it is not bundled. No. 6 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is not a smoker. No. 7 While the given policyholder is not uninsurable, so it has no rider. No. 8 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it has a rider. No. 9 While the given policyholder is lapsed, so it is not grandfathered. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a beneficiary. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is inspected. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a beneficiary. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is appraised. No. 2 wins over No. 9. No. 1 wins over No. 5. No. 6 wins over No. 3. No. 7 wins over No. 8. Question: Is the claim \"Xaver is bundled\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027909", "pair_id": "u027909-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027909-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "98ec94e3f57ed40b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027909-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver has no adjuster. Xaver has a premium discount. Xaver is appraised. Xaver is not uninsurable. Xaver is not lapsed. Xaver is inspected.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a rider, so it is bundled. No. 2 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is grandfathered. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a premium discount, so it is a smoker. No. 4 While the given policyholder is a claimant, so it is not subrogated. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a rider, so it is not bundled. No. 6 While the given policyholder has an adjuster, so it is not a smoker. No. 7 While the given policyholder is uninsurable, so it has no rider. No. 8 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it has a rider. No. 9 While the given policyholder is lapsed, so it is not grandfathered. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a beneficiary. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is inspected. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a beneficiary. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is appraised. No. 2 wins over No. 9. No. 1 wins over No. 5. No. 6 wins over No. 3. No. 7 wins over No. 8. Question: Is the claim \"Xaver is bundled\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027909", "pair_id": "u027909-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027909-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "44a8d51ac92b17de", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027913-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is obsolete. Schist has a lint backlog of 10. Schist is not obsolete. Pumice is not merged. Pumice is obsolete. Schist is not merged. Mica has a lint backlog of 9. Talc has a lint backlog of 76. Mica has a changelog. Talc is not merged. Talc is backported. Schist is not backported. Schist has no changelog. Talc has no changelog. Pumice is backported.", "instruction": "(1) If a build has a feature toggle, then it is reverted. (2) If a build has a changelog, then it has a feature toggle. (3) If a build is obsolete, then it has a migration script. (4) If a build is merged, then it is not experimental. (5) If a build is experimental, then it is not reverted. (6) If a build is not backported, then it is experimental. (7) If a build has a lint backlog of at least 21, then it has no feature toggle. When (2) and (7) clash, (2) prevails. When (6) and (4) clash, (6) prevails. When (1) and (5) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Schist is reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027913", "pair_id": "u027913-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027913-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "913cbe9f9cde000d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027913-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is obsolete. Schist has a lint backlog of 10. Schist is not obsolete. Pumice is not merged. Pumice is obsolete. Schist is not merged. Mica has a lint backlog of 9. Talc has a lint backlog of 76. Mica has a changelog. Talc is not merged. Talc is backported. Schist is not backported. Schist has no changelog. Talc has no changelog. Pumice is backported.", "instruction": "(1) If a build has a feature toggle, then it is reverted. (2) If a build has a changelog, then it has a feature toggle. (3) If a build is obsolete, then it has a migration script. (4) If a build is merged, then it is not experimental. (5) If a build is experimental, then it is not reverted. (6) If a build is backported, then it is experimental. (7) If a build has a lint backlog of at least 21, then it has no feature toggle. When (2) and (7) clash, (2) prevails. When (6) and (4) clash, (6) prevails. When (1) and (5) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Schist is reverted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027913", "pair_id": "u027913-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027913-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ebd8aabadd2d292a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027944-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist has a feature toggle. Feldspar is not documented. Talc is not documented. Talc is not reverted. Schist is not reverted. Talc has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is reverted, then it is backported. (2) If a build has no feature toggle, then it is merged. (3) If a build is merged, then it is not compiled. (4) If a build is documented, then it has no migration script. (5) If a build is compiled, then it is not tested. (6) If a build is backported, then it is profiled. (7) If a build is backported, then it is compiled. Question: Is it true that Talc is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027944", "pair_id": "u027944-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027944-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "0a587d41676283d0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027944-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist has a feature toggle. Feldspar is not documented. Talc is not documented. Talc is not reverted. Schist is not reverted. Talc has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "(1) If a build is reverted, then it is backported. (2) If a build has a feature toggle, then it is merged. (3) If a build is merged, then it is not compiled. (4) If a build is documented, then it has no migration script. (5) If a build is compiled, then it is not tested. (6) If a build is backported, then it is profiled. (7) If a build is backported, then it is compiled. Question: Is it true that Talc is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027944", "pair_id": "u027944-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027944-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "0915da1d28055b5d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027944-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist has a feature toggle. Feldspar is not documented. Talc is not documented. Talc is not reverted. Schist is not reverted. Talc has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is reverted, it also is backported. Clause 2: once any build has no feature toggle, it also is merged. Clause 3: once any build is merged, it also is not compiled. Clause 4: once any build is documented, it also has no migration script. Clause 5: once any build is compiled, it also is not tested. Clause 6: once any build is backported, it also is profiled. Clause 7: once any build is backported, it also is compiled. Question: Does it follow that Talc is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027944", "pair_id": "u027944-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027944-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "0a587d41676283d0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027944-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist has a feature toggle. Feldspar is not documented. Talc is not documented. Talc is not reverted. Schist is not reverted. Talc has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is reverted, it also is backported. Clause 2: once any build has a feature toggle, it also is merged. Clause 3: once any build is merged, it also is not compiled. Clause 4: once any build is documented, it also has no migration script. Clause 5: once any build is compiled, it also is not tested. Clause 6: once any build is backported, it also is profiled. Clause 7: once any build is backported, it also is compiled. Question: Does it follow that Talc is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027944", "pair_id": "u027944-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027944-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "0915da1d28055b5d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027944-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist has a feature toggle. Feldspar is not documented. Talc is not documented. Talc is not reverted. Schist is not reverted. Talc has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is reverted, that build is backported. Item B. When the build has no feature toggle, that build is merged. Item C. When the build is merged, that build is not compiled. Item D. When the build is documented, that build has no migration script. Item E. When the build is compiled, that build is not tested. Item F. When the build is backported, that build is profiled. Item G. When the build is backported, that build is compiled. Question: Can one infer that Talc is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027944", "pair_id": "u027944-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027944-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "0a587d41676283d0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027944-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist has a feature toggle. Feldspar is not documented. Talc is not documented. Talc is not reverted. Schist is not reverted. Talc has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is reverted, that build is backported. Item B. When the build has a feature toggle, that build is merged. Item C. When the build is merged, that build is not compiled. Item D. When the build is documented, that build has no migration script. Item E. When the build is compiled, that build is not tested. Item F. When the build is backported, that build is profiled. Item G. When the build is backported, that build is compiled. Question: Can one infer that Talc is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027944", "pair_id": "u027944-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027944-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "0915da1d28055b5d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u027975-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Agata has a peril factor of 18. Agata has no rider. Agata is appraised. Agata is not subrogated. Agata has a deductible waiver. Agata has a payout ceiling of 82. Agata has a beneficiary.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is grandfathered, and is not subrogated, and has no rider, that policyholder is covered. Item B. When the policyholder has a beneficiary, that policyholder is not indemnified. Item C. When the policyholder has a peril factor of less than 22, and is appraised, and has a deductible waiver, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item D. When the policyholder is grandfathered, and has a premium band of more than 70, and is subrogated, that policyholder is a claimant. Item E. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of no more than 12, that policyholder has no premium discount. Item F. When the policyholder has a deductible waiver, that policyholder is uninsurable. Item G. When the policyholder is grandfathered, and is subrogated, that policyholder is reinstated. Item B is suspended when the policyholder has no rider. Question: What applies to Agata?", "options": ["is reinstated", "is covered", "is a claimant"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is covered", "unit_id": "u027975", "pair_id": "u027975-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027975-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "19a03f1adb74c936", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a4", "a14"]}, "attempt": 17}}
{"id": "syn-u027975-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Agata has a peril factor of 18. Agata has no rider. Agata is appraised. Agata is subrogated. Agata has a deductible waiver. Agata has a payout ceiling of 82. Agata has a beneficiary.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is grandfathered, and is not subrogated, and has no rider, that policyholder is covered. Item B. When the policyholder has a beneficiary, that policyholder is not indemnified. Item C. When the policyholder has a peril factor of less than 22, and is appraised, and has a deductible waiver, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item D. When the policyholder is grandfathered, and has a premium band of more than 70, and is subrogated, that policyholder is a claimant. Item E. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of no more than 12, that policyholder has no premium discount. Item F. When the policyholder has a deductible waiver, that policyholder is uninsurable. Item G. When the policyholder is grandfathered, and is subrogated, that policyholder is reinstated. Item B is suspended when the policyholder has no rider. Question: What applies to Agata?", "options": ["is reinstated", "is covered", "is a claimant"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is reinstated", "unit_id": "u027975", "pair_id": "u027975-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027975-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "735a65a83f23475f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a4", "a14"]}, "attempt": 17}}
{"id": "syn-u027982-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory has a waybill. Jory is labeled. Jory is not prepaid. Jory has a courier. Jory is not hazardous. Jory is refrigerated. Jory is not sealed. Jory is rerouted. Jory is misrouted. Jory is not registered. Jory is palletized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is prepaid, thus it is weighed. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a locker slot, thus it is not oversized. Provision 3: when the parcel here is fragile while is registered while is consolidated, thus it is tracked. Provision 4: when the parcel here has a waybill, thus it is scanned. Provision 5: when the parcel here is fragile while is damaged while is refrigerated, thus it is perishable. Provision 6: when the parcel here is sealed while is hazardous while is damaged, thus it is consolidated. Provision 7: when the parcel here is fragile while is prepaid, thus it is stamped. Provision 8: when the parcel here is palletized while is rerouted while is misrouted, thus it is fragile. Provision 9: when the parcel here is fragile while is labeled while has a courier, thus it has a locker slot. Provision 7 has no effect when the parcel here is registered. Provision 9 has no effect when the parcel here is damaged. Provision 1 has no effect when the parcel here is damaged. Provision 9 has no effect when the parcel here is prepaid. Question: Which one describes Jory?", "options": ["is perishable", "is tracked", "is stamped", "has a locker slot"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a locker slot", "unit_id": "u027982", "pair_id": "u027982-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027982-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1860a26e49493766", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a3", "a14", "a1"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u027982-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory has no waybill. Jory is labeled. Jory is not prepaid. Jory has a courier. Jory is not hazardous. Jory is refrigerated. Jory is not sealed. Jory is rerouted. Jory is misrouted. Jory is not registered. Jory is palletized.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is prepaid, thus it is weighed. Provision 2: when the parcel here has a locker slot, thus it is not oversized. Provision 3: when the parcel here is fragile while is registered while is consolidated, thus it is tracked. Provision 4: when the parcel here has a waybill, thus it is scanned. Provision 5: when the parcel here is fragile while is damaged while is refrigerated, thus it is perishable. Provision 6: when the parcel here is sealed while is hazardous while is damaged, thus it is consolidated. Provision 7: when the parcel here is fragile while is prepaid, thus it is stamped. Provision 8: when the parcel here is palletized while is rerouted while is misrouted, thus it is fragile. Provision 9: when the parcel here is fragile while is labeled while has a courier, thus it has a locker slot. Provision 7 has no effect when the parcel here is registered. Provision 9 has no effect when the parcel here is damaged. Provision 1 has no effect when the parcel here is damaged. Provision 9 has no effect when the parcel here is prepaid. Question: Which one describes Jory?", "options": ["is perishable", "is tracked", "is stamped", "has a locker slot"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a locker slot", "unit_id": "u027982", "pair_id": "u027982-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027982-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7039b747403c4b10", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a3", "a14", "a1"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u027982-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory has a waybill. Jory is labeled. Jory is not prepaid. Jory has a courier. Jory is not hazardous. Jory is refrigerated. Jory is not sealed. Jory is rerouted. Jory is misrouted. Jory is not registered. Jory is palletized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is prepaid, it thereby is weighed. Point B. If said parcel has a locker slot, it thereby is not oversized. Point C. If said parcel is fragile and further is registered and further is consolidated, it thereby is tracked. Point D. If said parcel has a waybill, it thereby is scanned. Point E. If said parcel is fragile and further is damaged and further is refrigerated, it thereby is perishable. Point F. If said parcel is sealed and further is hazardous and further is damaged, it thereby is consolidated. Point G. If said parcel is fragile and further is prepaid, it thereby is stamped. Point H. If said parcel is palletized and further is rerouted and further is misrouted, it thereby is fragile. Point I. If said parcel is fragile and further is labeled and further has a courier, it thereby has a locker slot. Point G is cancelled if said parcel is registered. Point I is cancelled if said parcel is damaged. Point A is cancelled if said parcel is damaged. Point I is cancelled if said parcel is prepaid. Question: Which choice is true for Jory?", "options": ["is perishable", "is tracked", "is stamped", "has a locker slot"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a locker slot", "unit_id": "u027982", "pair_id": "u027982-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027982-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1860a26e49493766", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a3", "a14", "a1"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u027982-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory has no waybill. Jory is labeled. Jory is not prepaid. Jory has a courier. Jory is not hazardous. Jory is refrigerated. Jory is not sealed. Jory is rerouted. Jory is misrouted. Jory is not registered. Jory is palletized.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is prepaid, it thereby is weighed. Point B. If said parcel has a locker slot, it thereby is not oversized. Point C. If said parcel is fragile and further is registered and further is consolidated, it thereby is tracked. Point D. If said parcel has a waybill, it thereby is scanned. Point E. If said parcel is fragile and further is damaged and further is refrigerated, it thereby is perishable. Point F. If said parcel is sealed and further is hazardous and further is damaged, it thereby is consolidated. Point G. If said parcel is fragile and further is prepaid, it thereby is stamped. Point H. If said parcel is palletized and further is rerouted and further is misrouted, it thereby is fragile. Point I. If said parcel is fragile and further is labeled and further has a courier, it thereby has a locker slot. Point G is cancelled if said parcel is registered. Point I is cancelled if said parcel is damaged. Point A is cancelled if said parcel is damaged. Point I is cancelled if said parcel is prepaid. Question: Which choice is true for Jory?", "options": ["is perishable", "is tracked", "is stamped", "has a locker slot"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a locker slot", "unit_id": "u027982", "pair_id": "u027982-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027982-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7039b747403c4b10", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a3", "a14", "a1"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u027982-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory has a waybill. Jory is labeled. Jory is not prepaid. Jory has a courier. Jory is not hazardous. Jory is refrigerated. Jory is not sealed. Jory is rerouted. Jory is misrouted. Jory is not registered. Jory is palletized.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is prepaid, so it is weighed. No. 2 While the given parcel has a locker slot, so it is not oversized. No. 3 While the given parcel is fragile and likewise is registered and likewise is consolidated, so it is tracked. No. 4 While the given parcel has a waybill, so it is scanned. No. 5 While the given parcel is fragile and likewise is damaged and likewise is refrigerated, so it is perishable. No. 6 While the given parcel is sealed and likewise is hazardous and likewise is damaged, so it is consolidated. No. 7 While the given parcel is fragile and likewise is prepaid, so it is stamped. No. 8 While the given parcel is palletized and likewise is rerouted and likewise is misrouted, so it is fragile. No. 9 While the given parcel is fragile and likewise is labeled and likewise has a courier, so it has a locker slot. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given parcel is registered. No. 9 stops applying as long as the given parcel is damaged. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given parcel is damaged. No. 9 stops applying as long as the given parcel is prepaid. Question: Select what holds for Jory: which option?", "options": ["is perishable", "is tracked", "is stamped", "has a locker slot"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a locker slot", "unit_id": "u027982", "pair_id": "u027982-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027982-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1860a26e49493766", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a3", "a14", "a1"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u027982-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory has no waybill. Jory is labeled. Jory is not prepaid. Jory has a courier. Jory is not hazardous. Jory is refrigerated. Jory is not sealed. Jory is rerouted. Jory is misrouted. Jory is not registered. Jory is palletized.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is prepaid, so it is weighed. No. 2 While the given parcel has a locker slot, so it is not oversized. No. 3 While the given parcel is fragile and likewise is registered and likewise is consolidated, so it is tracked. No. 4 While the given parcel has a waybill, so it is scanned. No. 5 While the given parcel is fragile and likewise is damaged and likewise is refrigerated, so it is perishable. No. 6 While the given parcel is sealed and likewise is hazardous and likewise is damaged, so it is consolidated. No. 7 While the given parcel is fragile and likewise is prepaid, so it is stamped. No. 8 While the given parcel is palletized and likewise is rerouted and likewise is misrouted, so it is fragile. No. 9 While the given parcel is fragile and likewise is labeled and likewise has a courier, so it has a locker slot. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given parcel is registered. No. 9 stops applying as long as the given parcel is damaged. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given parcel is damaged. No. 9 stops applying as long as the given parcel is prepaid. Question: Select what holds for Jory: which option?", "options": ["is perishable", "is tracked", "is stamped", "has a locker slot"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a locker slot", "unit_id": "u027982", "pair_id": "u027982-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u027982-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "7039b747403c4b10", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a8", "a3", "a14", "a1"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u027988-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke has a mortgage. Ingrid has no collateral. Corin has a mortgage. Ingrid has no mortgage. Ingrid is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has a mortgage: then it is garnished. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is refinanced: then it is vetted. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is vetted: then it has an escrow account. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is garnished: then it is not employed. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is not employed: then it has no escrow account. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is not foreclosed: then it is not indebted. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has no collateral: then it is refinanced. Question: Is it so that Ingrid has no escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u027988", "pair_id": "u027988-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027988-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "81824541f3a78418", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u027988-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke has a mortgage. Ingrid has no collateral. Corin has a mortgage. Ingrid has no mortgage. Ingrid is foreclosed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has a mortgage: then it is garnished. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is refinanced: then it is vetted. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is vetted: then it has an escrow account. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is garnished: then it is not employed. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is not employed: then it has no escrow account. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is not foreclosed: then it is not indebted. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it is refinanced. Question: Is it so that Ingrid has no escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u027988", "pair_id": "u027988-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u027988-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "227cc03d4435cdb5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028034-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is not a smoker. Fabian has a claim frequency of 4. Fabian is not lapsed. Edda has a claim frequency of 21. Edda is not lapsed. Agata has a claim frequency of 57. Agata is not lapsed. Agata has a payout ceiling of 4. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 19.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is lapsed and further is uninsurable, it thereby has a rider. Point B. If said policyholder is a smoker and further has a payout ceiling short of 49, it thereby is appraised. Point C. If said policyholder is indemnified, it thereby has no roadside assistance. Point D. If said policyholder is lapsed and further has a claim frequency short of 47 and further has a payout ceiling short of 24, it thereby is not retired. Point E. If said policyholder is lapsed and further has a claim frequency of minimum 47, it thereby is retired. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder is lapsed and further is a smoker. Point C is cancelled if said policyholder has a claim frequency of minimum 71. Question: Statement: Fabian is retired. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028034", "pair_id": "u028034-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028034-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "65423bbbba493698", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028034-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is not a smoker. Fabian has a claim frequency of 4. Fabian is lapsed. Edda has a claim frequency of 21. Edda is not lapsed. Agata has a claim frequency of 57. Agata is not lapsed. Agata has a payout ceiling of 4. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 19.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is lapsed and further is uninsurable, it thereby has a rider. Point B. If said policyholder is a smoker and further has a payout ceiling short of 49, it thereby is appraised. Point C. If said policyholder is indemnified, it thereby has no roadside assistance. Point D. If said policyholder is lapsed and further has a claim frequency short of 47 and further has a payout ceiling short of 24, it thereby is not retired. Point E. If said policyholder is lapsed and further has a claim frequency of minimum 47, it thereby is retired. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder is lapsed and further is a smoker. Point C is cancelled if said policyholder has a claim frequency of minimum 71. Question: Statement: Fabian is retired. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028034", "pair_id": "u028034-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028034-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "55d588216bc0f37b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028034-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is not a smoker. Fabian has a claim frequency of 4. Fabian is not lapsed. Edda has a claim frequency of 21. Edda is not lapsed. Agata has a claim frequency of 57. Agata is not lapsed. Agata has a payout ceiling of 4. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 19.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is lapsed and likewise is uninsurable, so it has a rider. No. 2 While the given policyholder is a smoker and likewise has a payout ceiling that falls below 49, so it is appraised. No. 3 While the given policyholder is indemnified, so it has no roadside assistance. No. 4 While the given policyholder is lapsed and likewise has a claim frequency that falls below 47 and likewise has a payout ceiling that falls below 24, so it is not retired. No. 5 While the given policyholder is lapsed and likewise has a claim frequency not below 47, so it is retired. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is lapsed and likewise is a smoker. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a claim frequency not below 71. Question: Is the claim \"Fabian is retired\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028034", "pair_id": "u028034-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028034-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "65423bbbba493698", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028034-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is not a smoker. Fabian has a claim frequency of 4. Fabian is lapsed. Edda has a claim frequency of 21. Edda is not lapsed. Agata has a claim frequency of 57. Agata is not lapsed. Agata has a payout ceiling of 4. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 19.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is lapsed and likewise is uninsurable, so it has a rider. No. 2 While the given policyholder is a smoker and likewise has a payout ceiling that falls below 49, so it is appraised. No. 3 While the given policyholder is indemnified, so it has no roadside assistance. No. 4 While the given policyholder is lapsed and likewise has a claim frequency that falls below 47 and likewise has a payout ceiling that falls below 24, so it is not retired. No. 5 While the given policyholder is lapsed and likewise has a claim frequency not below 47, so it is retired. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is lapsed and likewise is a smoker. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given policyholder has a claim frequency not below 71. Question: Is the claim \"Fabian is retired\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028034", "pair_id": "u028034-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028034-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "55d588216bc0f37b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028064-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is reimbursed. Una has a peril factor of 1. Una is not disputed. Una is not bundled. Una has roadside assistance. Una is lapsed. Una has a payout ceiling of 88.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is not bundled and further has a payout ceiling short of 73, it thereby is subrogated. Point B. If said policyholder is not covered, it thereby has a dashcam. Point C. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby has a rider. Point D. If said policyholder has a dashcam and further is not bundled and further has roadside assistance, it thereby is litigated. Point E. If said policyholder has a peril factor short of 64, it thereby is not covered. Point F. If said policyholder has a dashcam and further is bundled and further has a payout ceiling short of 24, it thereby is not litigated. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is not lapsed and further is not disputed. Question: Statement: Una is litigated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028064", "pair_id": "u028064-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028064-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f79ee9fd530abaf2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 21}}
{"id": "syn-u028064-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is reimbursed. Una has a peril factor of 1. Una is not disputed. Una is not bundled. Una has roadside assistance. Una is lapsed. Una has a payout ceiling of 88.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is not bundled and further has a payout ceiling short of 73, it thereby is subrogated. Point B. If said policyholder is not covered, it thereby has a dashcam. Point C. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby has a rider. Point D. If said policyholder has a dashcam and further is not bundled and further has no roadside assistance, it thereby is litigated. Point E. If said policyholder has a peril factor short of 64, it thereby is not covered. Point F. If said policyholder has a dashcam and further is bundled and further has a payout ceiling short of 24, it thereby is not litigated. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder is not lapsed and further is not disputed. Question: Statement: Una is litigated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028064", "pair_id": "u028064-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028064-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3733ffb01297d61c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 21}}
{"id": "syn-u028064-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is reimbursed. Una has a peril factor of 1. Una is not disputed. Una is not bundled. Una has roadside assistance. Una is lapsed. Una has a payout ceiling of 88.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is not bundled and likewise has a payout ceiling that falls below 73, so it is subrogated. No. 2 While the given policyholder is not covered, so it has a dashcam. No. 3 While the given policyholder is reimbursed, so it has a rider. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a dashcam and likewise is not bundled and likewise has roadside assistance, so it is litigated. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a peril factor that falls below 64, so it is not covered. No. 6 While the given policyholder has a dashcam and likewise is bundled and likewise has a payout ceiling that falls below 24, so it is not litigated. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not lapsed and likewise is not disputed. Question: Is the claim \"Una is litigated\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028064", "pair_id": "u028064-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028064-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f79ee9fd530abaf2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 21}}
{"id": "syn-u028064-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is reimbursed. Una has a peril factor of 1. Una is not disputed. Una is not bundled. Una has roadside assistance. Una is lapsed. Una has a payout ceiling of 88.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is not bundled and likewise has a payout ceiling that falls below 73, so it is subrogated. No. 2 While the given policyholder is not covered, so it has a dashcam. No. 3 While the given policyholder is reimbursed, so it has a rider. No. 4 While the given policyholder has a dashcam and likewise is not bundled and likewise has no roadside assistance, so it is litigated. No. 5 While the given policyholder has a peril factor that falls below 64, so it is not covered. No. 6 While the given policyholder has a dashcam and likewise is bundled and likewise has a payout ceiling that falls below 24, so it is not litigated. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is not lapsed and likewise is not disputed. Question: Is the claim \"Una is litigated\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028064", "pair_id": "u028064-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028064-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3733ffb01297d61c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 21}}
{"id": "syn-u028071-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse has a team size of 10. Deneb is longitudinal. Izar has a citation index of 1. Izar has a review mark of 4. Fomalhaut is not peer reviewed. Deneb is not a pilot study. Deneb has a review mark of 22. Izar is a pilot study. Fomalhaut has a steering committee. Fomalhaut is not longitudinal. Fomalhaut has a review mark of 18. Izar has a team size of 3. Deneb has a team size of 57. Deneb has a citation index of 14. Deneb has no steering committee. Izar is longitudinal. Fomalhaut is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut is not a pilot study. Izar is peer reviewed. Betelgeuse has a review mark of 89. Deneb is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is longitudinal and further has a review mark of maximum 51 and further has a citation index of maximum 37, it thereby is shortlisted. Point B. If said proposal is shortlisted and further is longitudinal and further is peer reviewed, it thereby has a field site. Point C. If said proposal has a steering committee, it thereby is multicenter. Point D. If said proposal is shortlisted and further has a team size short of 86 and further is a pilot study, it thereby is embargoed. Point E. If said proposal is longitudinal and further has a review mark in excess of 51 and further is a pilot study, it thereby is not shortlisted. Point B is cancelled if said proposal is a pilot study. Point A is cancelled if said proposal is interdisciplinary and further is peer reviewed. Question: Statement: Deneb is not shortlisted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028071", "pair_id": "u028071-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/2/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028071-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9399d1c762958b3a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028071-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse has a team size of 10. Deneb is longitudinal. Izar has a citation index of 1. Izar has a review mark of 4. Fomalhaut is not peer reviewed. Deneb is not a pilot study. Deneb has a review mark of 22. Izar is a pilot study. Fomalhaut has a steering committee. Fomalhaut is not longitudinal. Fomalhaut has a review mark of 18. Izar has a team size of 3. Deneb has a team size of 57. Deneb has a citation index of 14. Deneb has no steering committee. Izar is longitudinal. Fomalhaut is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut is not a pilot study. Izar is peer reviewed. Betelgeuse has a review mark of 89. Deneb is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is longitudinal and further has a review mark of maximum 51 and further has a citation index in excess of 37, it thereby is shortlisted. Point B. If said proposal is shortlisted and further is longitudinal and further is peer reviewed, it thereby has a field site. Point C. If said proposal has a steering committee, it thereby is multicenter. Point D. If said proposal is shortlisted and further has a team size short of 86 and further is a pilot study, it thereby is embargoed. Point E. If said proposal is longitudinal and further has a review mark in excess of 51 and further is a pilot study, it thereby is not shortlisted. Point B is cancelled if said proposal is a pilot study. Point A is cancelled if said proposal is interdisciplinary and further is peer reviewed. Question: Statement: Deneb is not shortlisted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028071", "pair_id": "u028071-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/2/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028071-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f5b7734d2e07d6ca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028071-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse has a team size of 10. Deneb is longitudinal. Izar has a citation index of 1. Izar has a review mark of 4. Fomalhaut is not peer reviewed. Deneb is not a pilot study. Deneb has a review mark of 22. Izar is a pilot study. Fomalhaut has a steering committee. Fomalhaut is not longitudinal. Fomalhaut has a review mark of 18. Izar has a team size of 3. Deneb has a team size of 57. Deneb has a citation index of 14. Deneb has no steering committee. Izar is longitudinal. Fomalhaut is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut is not a pilot study. Izar is peer reviewed. Betelgeuse has a review mark of 89. Deneb is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is longitudinal and likewise has a review mark not above 51 and likewise has a citation index not above 37, so it is shortlisted. No. 2 While the given proposal is shortlisted and likewise is longitudinal and likewise is peer reviewed, so it has a field site. No. 3 While the given proposal has a steering committee, so it is multicenter. No. 4 While the given proposal is shortlisted and likewise has a team size that falls below 86 and likewise is a pilot study, so it is embargoed. No. 5 While the given proposal is longitudinal and likewise has a review mark that exceeds 51 and likewise is a pilot study, so it is not shortlisted. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given proposal is a pilot study. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal is interdisciplinary and likewise is peer reviewed. Question: Is the claim \"Deneb is not shortlisted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028071", "pair_id": "u028071-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/2/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028071-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9399d1c762958b3a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028071-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Betelgeuse has a team size of 10. Deneb is longitudinal. Izar has a citation index of 1. Izar has a review mark of 4. Fomalhaut is not peer reviewed. Deneb is not a pilot study. Deneb has a review mark of 22. Izar is a pilot study. Fomalhaut has a steering committee. Fomalhaut is not longitudinal. Fomalhaut has a review mark of 18. Izar has a team size of 3. Deneb has a team size of 57. Deneb has a citation index of 14. Deneb has no steering committee. Izar is longitudinal. Fomalhaut is interdisciplinary. Fomalhaut is not a pilot study. Izar is peer reviewed. Betelgeuse has a review mark of 89. Deneb is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is longitudinal and likewise has a review mark not above 51 and likewise has a citation index that exceeds 37, so it is shortlisted. No. 2 While the given proposal is shortlisted and likewise is longitudinal and likewise is peer reviewed, so it has a field site. No. 3 While the given proposal has a steering committee, so it is multicenter. No. 4 While the given proposal is shortlisted and likewise has a team size that falls below 86 and likewise is a pilot study, so it is embargoed. No. 5 While the given proposal is longitudinal and likewise has a review mark that exceeds 51 and likewise is a pilot study, so it is not shortlisted. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given proposal is a pilot study. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given proposal is interdisciplinary and likewise is peer reviewed. Question: Is the claim \"Deneb is not shortlisted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028071", "pair_id": "u028071-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/2/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028071-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f5b7734d2e07d6ca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028075-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirela is misrouted. Mirela has no courier. Mirela is registered. Ulla is stamped. Mirela is stamped. Mirela is prepaid. Ulla has a waybill. Mirela is palletized. Mirela is refrigerated. Mirela has a locker slot. Mirela has a waybill. Ulla is palletized. Mirela is not fragile.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is registered and also is palletized and also is misrouted, it also is scanned. Clause 2: once any parcel is fragile, it also is not hazardous. Clause 3: once any parcel is stamped, it also is sealed. Clause 4: once any parcel is undeliverable, it also is not scanned. Clause 5: once any parcel is registered and also is undeliverable and also is refrigerated, it also is consolidated. Clause 6: once any parcel is registered and also is fragile and also is prepaid, it also is delayed. Clause 7: once any parcel is registered, it also is not sealed. Clause 8: once any parcel is registered and also has a courier and also has a locker slot, it also is hazardous. Clause 9: once any parcel has a waybill, it also has a barcode. Clause 3 overrides Clause 7. Clause 2 overrides Clause 8. Clause 4 overrides Clause 1. Question: Which of these is true of Mirela?", "options": ["is consolidated", "is scanned", "is delayed", "is hazardous"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is scanned", "unit_id": "u028075", "pair_id": "u028075-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028075-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5ae55440c2755d80", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a13", "a9", "a11"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u028075-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirela is misrouted. Mirela has no courier. Mirela is registered. Mirela is undeliverable. Ulla is stamped. Mirela is stamped. Mirela is prepaid. Ulla has a waybill. Mirela is palletized. Mirela is refrigerated. Mirela has a locker slot. Mirela has a waybill. Ulla is palletized. Mirela is not fragile.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is registered and also is palletized and also is misrouted, it also is scanned. Clause 2: once any parcel is fragile, it also is not hazardous. Clause 3: once any parcel is stamped, it also is sealed. Clause 4: once any parcel is undeliverable, it also is not scanned. Clause 5: once any parcel is registered and also is undeliverable and also is refrigerated, it also is consolidated. Clause 6: once any parcel is registered and also is fragile and also is prepaid, it also is delayed. Clause 7: once any parcel is registered, it also is not sealed. Clause 8: once any parcel is registered and also has a courier and also has a locker slot, it also is hazardous. Clause 9: once any parcel has a waybill, it also has a barcode. Clause 3 overrides Clause 7. Clause 2 overrides Clause 8. Clause 4 overrides Clause 1. Question: Which of these is true of Mirela?", "options": ["is consolidated", "is scanned", "is delayed", "is hazardous"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is consolidated", "unit_id": "u028075", "pair_id": "u028075-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028075-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e8c53435a03c964d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a13", "a9", "a11"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u028075-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirela is misrouted. Mirela has no courier. Mirela is registered. Ulla is stamped. Mirela is stamped. Mirela is prepaid. Ulla has a waybill. Mirela is palletized. Mirela is refrigerated. Mirela has a locker slot. Mirela has a waybill. Ulla is palletized. Mirela is not fragile.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is registered, and is palletized, and is misrouted, that parcel is scanned. Item B. When the parcel is fragile, that parcel is not hazardous. Item C. When the parcel is stamped, that parcel is sealed. Item D. When the parcel is undeliverable, that parcel is not scanned. Item E. When the parcel is registered, and is undeliverable, and is refrigerated, that parcel is consolidated. Item F. When the parcel is registered, and is fragile, and is prepaid, that parcel is delayed. Item G. When the parcel is registered, that parcel is not sealed. Item H. When the parcel is registered, and has a courier, and has a locker slot, that parcel is hazardous. Item I. When the parcel has a waybill, that parcel has a barcode. Item C outranks Item G. Item B outranks Item H. Item D outranks Item A. Question: What applies to Mirela?", "options": ["is consolidated", "is scanned", "is delayed", "is hazardous"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is scanned", "unit_id": "u028075", "pair_id": "u028075-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028075-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5ae55440c2755d80", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a13", "a9", "a11"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u028075-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirela is misrouted. Mirela has no courier. Mirela is registered. Mirela is undeliverable. Ulla is stamped. Mirela is stamped. Mirela is prepaid. Ulla has a waybill. Mirela is palletized. Mirela is refrigerated. Mirela has a locker slot. Mirela has a waybill. Ulla is palletized. Mirela is not fragile.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel is registered, and is palletized, and is misrouted, that parcel is scanned. Item B. When the parcel is fragile, that parcel is not hazardous. Item C. When the parcel is stamped, that parcel is sealed. Item D. When the parcel is undeliverable, that parcel is not scanned. Item E. When the parcel is registered, and is undeliverable, and is refrigerated, that parcel is consolidated. Item F. When the parcel is registered, and is fragile, and is prepaid, that parcel is delayed. Item G. When the parcel is registered, that parcel is not sealed. Item H. When the parcel is registered, and has a courier, and has a locker slot, that parcel is hazardous. Item I. When the parcel has a waybill, that parcel has a barcode. Item C outranks Item G. Item B outranks Item H. Item D outranks Item A. Question: What applies to Mirela?", "options": ["is consolidated", "is scanned", "is delayed", "is hazardous"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is consolidated", "unit_id": "u028075", "pair_id": "u028075-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028075-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e8c53435a03c964d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a13", "a9", "a11"]}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u028157-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta has a guarantor. Greta is not prequalified. Greta is not vetted. Greta has a mortgage. Greta is indebted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a mortgage and also is not prequalified and also has a guarantor, it also has no escrow account. Clause 2: once any borrower has a mortgage and also is a depositor and also is vetted, it also has an escrow account. Clause 3: once any borrower has an escrow account, it also is delinquent. Clause 4: once any borrower has a mortgage, it also is not delinquent. Clause 5: once any borrower is indebted, it also is not a homeowner. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is a depositor. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a guarantor and also is amortized. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Clause 3 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Greta has no escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028157", "pair_id": "u028157-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028157-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b9550561c3700367", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028157-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Greta has a guarantor. Greta is not prequalified. Greta is not vetted. Greta has a mortgage. Greta is indebted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a mortgage and also is prequalified and also has a guarantor, it also has no escrow account. Clause 2: once any borrower has a mortgage and also is a depositor and also is vetted, it also has an escrow account. Clause 3: once any borrower has an escrow account, it also is delinquent. Clause 4: once any borrower has a mortgage, it also is not delinquent. Clause 5: once any borrower is indebted, it also is not a homeowner. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is a depositor. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a guarantor and also is amortized. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Clause 3 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Greta has no escrow account?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028157", "pair_id": "u028157-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028157-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9a1c0d63b8f3ecc2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028240-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not a smoker. Agata has roadside assistance. Agata is not subrogated. Viggo is not a smoker. Agata is bundled.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it is not grandfathered. No. 2 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it is retired. No. 3 While the given policyholder is subrogated, so it is grandfathered. No. 4 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it has flood coverage. No. 5 While the given policyholder is bundled, so it has a rider. Question: Is the claim \"Agata is grandfathered\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028240", "pair_id": "u028240-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028240-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "21426ec549f14d13", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028240-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not a smoker. Agata has roadside assistance. Agata is subrogated. Viggo is not a smoker. Agata is bundled.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it is not grandfathered. No. 2 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it is retired. No. 3 While the given policyholder is subrogated, so it is grandfathered. No. 4 While the given policyholder has roadside assistance, so it has flood coverage. No. 5 While the given policyholder is bundled, so it has a rider. Question: Is the claim \"Agata is grandfathered\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028240", "pair_id": "u028240-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028240-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "8623f2cc00e94853", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028247-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is minified. Pumice is not minified. Obsidian is tagged. Shale is not linted. Shale is not tagged. Shale is minified. Pumice is reverted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is linted and likewise is reverted and likewise is minified, so it has no feature toggle. No. 2 While the given build is tagged and likewise is reverted and likewise is linted, so it is experimental. Question: Is the claim \"Pumice is not linted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028247", "pair_id": "u028247-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028247-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "e3a48b9fca6bd31e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028247-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is minified. Pumice is not minified. Obsidian is tagged. Shale is not linted. Shale is not tagged. Pumice is not linted. Shale is minified. Pumice is reverted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is linted and likewise is reverted and likewise is minified, so it has no feature toggle. No. 2 While the given build is tagged and likewise is reverted and likewise is linted, so it is experimental. Question: Is the claim \"Pumice is not linted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028247", "pair_id": "u028247-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028247-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "bad0dca66bdcb7e2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028250-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is waitlisted. Xenia is vaccinated. Vilja has no pacemaker. Vilja is vaccinated. Vilja is not triaged. Xenia is not diabetic. Vilja is waitlisted. Xenia has an interpreter. Xenia has a pacemaker.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is not hypertensive, then it is rescheduled. (2) If a patient is triaged, then it is ambulatory. (3) If a patient has an interpreter, then it is not anemic. (4) If a patient is not waitlisted, then it is not ambulatory. (5) If a patient is vaccinated, then it has no caregiver. (6) If a patient is ambulatory, then it is not postoperative. (7) If a patient is ambulatory, then it is postoperative. (6) is void if the patient is not vaccinated. (6) is void if the patient is diabetic. (7) is void if the patient is not diabetic. (1) is void if the patient is diabetic. (2) is void if the patient has no pacemaker. When (7) and (6) clash, (7) prevails. When (4) and (2) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Xenia is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028250", "pair_id": "u028250-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028250-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "92ae817bed67b889", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028250-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is waitlisted. Xenia is vaccinated. Xenia is triaged. Vilja has no pacemaker. Vilja is vaccinated. Vilja is not triaged. Xenia is not diabetic. Vilja is waitlisted. Xenia has an interpreter. Xenia has a pacemaker.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is not hypertensive, then it is rescheduled. (2) If a patient is triaged, then it is ambulatory. (3) If a patient has an interpreter, then it is not anemic. (4) If a patient is not waitlisted, then it is not ambulatory. (5) If a patient is vaccinated, then it has no caregiver. (6) If a patient is ambulatory, then it is not postoperative. (7) If a patient is ambulatory, then it is postoperative. (6) is void if the patient is not vaccinated. (6) is void if the patient is diabetic. (7) is void if the patient is not diabetic. (1) is void if the patient is diabetic. (2) is void if the patient has no pacemaker. When (7) and (6) clash, (7) prevails. When (4) and (2) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Xenia is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028250", "pair_id": "u028250-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028250-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "df119bd1700abbe1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028250-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is waitlisted. Xenia is vaccinated. Vilja has no pacemaker. Vilja is vaccinated. Vilja is not triaged. Xenia is not diabetic. Vilja is waitlisted. Xenia has an interpreter. Xenia has a pacemaker.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is not hypertensive, it also is rescheduled. Clause 2: once any patient is triaged, it also is ambulatory. Clause 3: once any patient has an interpreter, it also is not anemic. Clause 4: once any patient is not waitlisted, it also is not ambulatory. Clause 5: once any patient is vaccinated, it also has no caregiver. Clause 6: once any patient is ambulatory, it also is not postoperative. Clause 7: once any patient is ambulatory, it also is postoperative. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not vaccinated. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is diabetic. Clause 7 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not diabetic. Clause 1 does not hold for a patient when any patient is diabetic. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient has no pacemaker. Clause 7 overrides Clause 6. Clause 4 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Xenia is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028250", "pair_id": "u028250-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028250-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "92ae817bed67b889", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028250-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is waitlisted. Xenia is vaccinated. Xenia is triaged. Vilja has no pacemaker. Vilja is vaccinated. Vilja is not triaged. Xenia is not diabetic. Vilja is waitlisted. Xenia has an interpreter. Xenia has a pacemaker.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is not hypertensive, it also is rescheduled. Clause 2: once any patient is triaged, it also is ambulatory. Clause 3: once any patient has an interpreter, it also is not anemic. Clause 4: once any patient is not waitlisted, it also is not ambulatory. Clause 5: once any patient is vaccinated, it also has no caregiver. Clause 6: once any patient is ambulatory, it also is not postoperative. Clause 7: once any patient is ambulatory, it also is postoperative. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not vaccinated. Clause 6 does not hold for a patient when any patient is diabetic. Clause 7 does not hold for a patient when any patient is not diabetic. Clause 1 does not hold for a patient when any patient is diabetic. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient has no pacemaker. Clause 7 overrides Clause 6. Clause 4 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Xenia is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028250", "pair_id": "u028250-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028250-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "df119bd1700abbe1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028250-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is waitlisted. Xenia is vaccinated. Vilja has no pacemaker. Vilja is vaccinated. Vilja is not triaged. Xenia is not diabetic. Vilja is waitlisted. Xenia has an interpreter. Xenia has a pacemaker.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is not hypertensive, that patient is rescheduled. Item B. When the patient is triaged, that patient is ambulatory. Item C. When the patient has an interpreter, that patient is not anemic. Item D. When the patient is not waitlisted, that patient is not ambulatory. Item E. When the patient is vaccinated, that patient has no caregiver. Item F. When the patient is ambulatory, that patient is not postoperative. Item G. When the patient is ambulatory, that patient is postoperative. Item F is suspended when the patient is not vaccinated. Item F is suspended when the patient is diabetic. Item G is suspended when the patient is not diabetic. Item A is suspended when the patient is diabetic. Item B is suspended when the patient has no pacemaker. Item G outranks Item F. Item D outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Xenia is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028250", "pair_id": "u028250-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028250-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "92ae817bed67b889", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028250-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is waitlisted. Xenia is vaccinated. Xenia is triaged. Vilja has no pacemaker. Vilja is vaccinated. Vilja is not triaged. Xenia is not diabetic. Vilja is waitlisted. Xenia has an interpreter. Xenia has a pacemaker.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is not hypertensive, that patient is rescheduled. Item B. When the patient is triaged, that patient is ambulatory. Item C. When the patient has an interpreter, that patient is not anemic. Item D. When the patient is not waitlisted, that patient is not ambulatory. Item E. When the patient is vaccinated, that patient has no caregiver. Item F. When the patient is ambulatory, that patient is not postoperative. Item G. When the patient is ambulatory, that patient is postoperative. Item F is suspended when the patient is not vaccinated. Item F is suspended when the patient is diabetic. Item G is suspended when the patient is not diabetic. Item A is suspended when the patient is diabetic. Item B is suspended when the patient has no pacemaker. Item G outranks Item F. Item D outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Xenia is postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028250", "pair_id": "u028250-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028250-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "df119bd1700abbe1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028259-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tundra has no public endpoint. Tundra is mirrored. Tundra has a CPU quota of 49. Tundra has a replica count of 80.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload has a latency budget of at most 44, then it has a dedicated host. (2) If a workload has a replica count above 38, then it is stateless. (3) If a workload is mirrored, then it is virtualized. (4) If a workload is mirrored, then it is not throttled. (5) If a workload has a replica count of at most 38, then it is containerized. (6) If a workload has a CPU quota of at most 48, then it is autoscaled. (7) If a workload has a public endpoint, then it is replicated. (4) is void if the workload has a latency budget above 44. (6) is void if the workload has a public endpoint. Question: Which option holds for Tundra?", "options": ["is replicated", "is containerized", "has a dedicated host", "is autoscaled", "is stateless"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is stateless", "unit_id": "u028259", "pair_id": "u028259-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028259-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "618ce3b5dee8ebb9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a10", "a7", "a11", "a8"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028259-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tundra has no public endpoint. Tundra is mirrored. Tundra has a CPU quota of 92. Tundra has a replica count of 80.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload has a latency budget of at most 44, then it has a dedicated host. (2) If a workload has a replica count above 38, then it is stateless. (3) If a workload is mirrored, then it is virtualized. (4) If a workload is mirrored, then it is not throttled. (5) If a workload has a replica count of at most 38, then it is containerized. (6) If a workload has a CPU quota of at most 48, then it is autoscaled. (7) If a workload has a public endpoint, then it is replicated. (4) is void if the workload has a latency budget above 44. (6) is void if the workload has a public endpoint. Question: Which option holds for Tundra?", "options": ["is replicated", "is containerized", "has a dedicated host", "is autoscaled", "is stateless"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is stateless", "unit_id": "u028259", "pair_id": "u028259-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028259-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b0bec7e0cba72ab9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a10", "a7", "a11", "a8"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028259-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tundra has no public endpoint. Tundra is mirrored. Tundra has a CPU quota of 49. Tundra has a replica count of 80.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload has a latency budget of 44 or less, it also has a dedicated host. Clause 2: once any workload has a replica count over 38, it also is stateless. Clause 3: once any workload is mirrored, it also is virtualized. Clause 4: once any workload is mirrored, it also is not throttled. Clause 5: once any workload has a replica count of 38 or less, it also is containerized. Clause 6: once any workload has a CPU quota of 48 or less, it also is autoscaled. Clause 7: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is replicated. Clause 4 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a latency budget over 44. Clause 6 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a public endpoint. Question: Which of these is true of Tundra?", "options": ["is replicated", "is containerized", "has a dedicated host", "is autoscaled", "is stateless"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is stateless", "unit_id": "u028259", "pair_id": "u028259-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028259-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "618ce3b5dee8ebb9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a10", "a7", "a11", "a8"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028259-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tundra has no public endpoint. Tundra is mirrored. Tundra has a CPU quota of 92. Tundra has a replica count of 80.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload has a latency budget of 44 or less, it also has a dedicated host. Clause 2: once any workload has a replica count over 38, it also is stateless. Clause 3: once any workload is mirrored, it also is virtualized. Clause 4: once any workload is mirrored, it also is not throttled. Clause 5: once any workload has a replica count of 38 or less, it also is containerized. Clause 6: once any workload has a CPU quota of 48 or less, it also is autoscaled. Clause 7: once any workload has a public endpoint, it also is replicated. Clause 4 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a latency budget over 44. Clause 6 does not hold for a workload when any workload has a public endpoint. Question: Which of these is true of Tundra?", "options": ["is replicated", "is containerized", "has a dedicated host", "is autoscaled", "is stateless"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is stateless", "unit_id": "u028259", "pair_id": "u028259-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028259-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b0bec7e0cba72ab9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a4", "a10", "a7", "a11", "a8"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028267-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not waitlisted. Cosima is postoperative. Cosima is waitlisted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has an interpreter provided that it is not postoperative. Section 2: a patient is bedridden provided that it is not waitlisted. Section 3: a patient is not bedridden provided that it is not vaccinated. Question: Cosima is not bedridden. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028267", "pair_id": "u028267-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028267-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "a1596995fa56f997", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028267-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not waitlisted. Cosima is postoperative. Cosima is waitlisted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient has an interpreter provided that it is not postoperative. Section 2: a patient is bedridden provided that it is waitlisted. Section 3: a patient is not bedridden provided that it is not vaccinated. Question: Cosima is not bedridden. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028267", "pair_id": "u028267-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028267-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "11b9320e880521d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028267-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not waitlisted. Cosima is postoperative. Cosima is waitlisted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is not postoperative, it then has an interpreter. #2 Each time a patient is not waitlisted, it then is bedridden. #3 Each time a patient is not vaccinated, it then is not bedridden. Question: Do the terms above show that Cosima is not bedridden?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028267", "pair_id": "u028267-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028267-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "a1596995fa56f997", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028267-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is not waitlisted. Cosima is postoperative. Cosima is waitlisted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is not postoperative, it then has an interpreter. #2 Each time a patient is waitlisted, it then is bedridden. #3 Each time a patient is not vaccinated, it then is not bedridden. Question: Do the terms above show that Cosima is not bedridden?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028267", "pair_id": "u028267-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028267-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "11b9320e880521d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028281-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not onboarded. Petra is not a graduate. Ivo is not unionized. Lotte has an aptitude quotient of 70. Noor has an aptitude quotient of 28. Noor is seasoned. Petra has no signing bonus. Petra is onboarded. Ivo has a notice period of 62. Petra is unionized. Ivo has no signing bonus. Noor is not unionized. Noor has a commute radius of 85. Noor has no signing bonus. Lotte has a notice period of 82. Petra has a commute radius of 50. Ivo is seasoned. Petra is seasoned. Petra has a notice period of 73.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has no diploma and further has a notice period short of 80 and further has a commute radius short of 58, it thereby is recommended. Point B. If said candidate has no diploma and further has a notice period of minimum 80 and further is not onboarded, it thereby is not recommended. Point C. If said candidate is unionized and further is seasoned and further has a notice period of minimum 71, it thereby is a veteran. Point D. If said candidate is unionized and further has a notice period of maximum 17, it thereby is interviewed. Point E. If said candidate is a veteran and further has an aptitude quotient in excess of 24 and further has a signing bonus, it thereby is freelance. Point F. If said candidate is a graduate, it thereby is fingerprinted. Question: Statement: Petra is recommended. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028281", "pair_id": "u028281-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028281-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "5c52763cd40c80ae", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028281-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte is not onboarded. Petra is not a graduate. Ivo is not unionized. Lotte has an aptitude quotient of 70. Noor has an aptitude quotient of 28. Noor is seasoned. Petra has no signing bonus. Petra is onboarded. Ivo has a notice period of 62. Petra is unionized. Ivo has no signing bonus. Noor is not unionized. Noor has a commute radius of 85. Noor has no signing bonus. Lotte has a notice period of 82. Petra has a commute radius of 50. Ivo is seasoned. Petra is seasoned. Petra has a notice period of 73.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has no diploma and further has a notice period short of 80 and further has a commute radius short of 58, it thereby is recommended. Point B. If said candidate has no diploma and further has a notice period of minimum 80 and further is not onboarded, it thereby is not recommended. Point C. If said candidate is unionized and further is seasoned and further has a notice period of minimum 71, it thereby is a veteran. Point D. If said candidate is unionized and further has a notice period of maximum 17, it thereby is interviewed. Point E. If said candidate is a veteran and further has an aptitude quotient in excess of 24 and further has a signing bonus, it thereby is freelance. Point F. If said candidate is a graduate, it thereby is fingerprinted. Point G. If said candidate is a veteran, it thereby has no diploma. Question: Statement: Petra is recommended. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028281", "pair_id": "u028281-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/6", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028281-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d719dc12391f3cb3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028300-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is obsolete. Basalt is not obsolete. Obsidian is merged. Zircon is linted. Obsidian is experimental. Schist is linted. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Schist is not experimental. Zircon is experimental. Obsidian is signed. Obsidian has a feature toggle. Schist is obsolete. Obsidian is linted. Zircon is signed. Zircon is obsolete. Schist is not signed. Schist is benchmarked. Zircon is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is benchmarked, it also is not reproducible. Clause 2: once any build is obsolete, it also is not profiled. Clause 3: once any build is merged, it also has a migration script. Clause 4: once any build is versioned, it also is flaky. Clause 5: once any build is signed, it also is profiled. Clause 6: once any build is reproducible, it also is minified. Clause 7: once any build has a migration script, it also is versioned. Clause 8: once any build is reproducible, it also is backported. Clause 9: once any build is experimental, it also is not localized. Clause 10: once any build is reproducible, it also is localized. Clause 11: once any build is documented, it also is reproducible. Clause 12: once any build is obsolete, it also is not documented. Clause 13: once any build is documented, it also is not flaky. Clause 14: once any build is linted, it also is documented. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Clause 10 overrides Clause 9. Clause 11 overrides Clause 1. Clause 12 overrides Clause 14. Clause 13 overrides Clause 4. Question: Which of these is true of Obsidian?", "options": ["is minified", "is flaky"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is flaky", "unit_id": "u028300", "pair_id": "u028300-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028300-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "18334934cc32b496", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u028300-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is obsolete. Basalt is not obsolete. Obsidian is merged. Zircon is linted. Obsidian is experimental. Schist is linted. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Schist is not experimental. Zircon is experimental. Obsidian is signed. Obsidian has a feature toggle. Schist is obsolete. Obsidian is linted. Zircon is signed. Zircon is obsolete. Schist is not signed. Schist is benchmarked. Zircon is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is benchmarked, it also is not reproducible. Clause 2: once any build is obsolete, it also is not profiled. Clause 3: once any build is merged, it also has a migration script. Clause 4: once any build is versioned, it also is flaky. Clause 5: once any build is signed, it also is profiled. Clause 6: once any build is reproducible, it also is minified. Clause 7: once any build has a migration script, it also is versioned. Clause 8: once any build is reproducible, it also is backported. Clause 9: once any build is experimental, it also is not localized. Clause 10: once any build is reproducible, it also is localized. Clause 11: once any build is documented, it also is reproducible. Clause 12: once any build is obsolete, it also is not documented. Clause 13: once any build is documented, it also is not flaky. Clause 14: once any build is linted, it also is documented. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Clause 10 overrides Clause 9. Clause 11 overrides Clause 1. Clause 14 overrides Clause 12. Clause 13 overrides Clause 4. Question: Which of these is true of Obsidian?", "options": ["is minified", "is flaky"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is minified", "unit_id": "u028300", "pair_id": "u028300-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028300-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "66661921b7a9b772", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u028306-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is not retired. Celeste has no roadside assistance. Celeste is bundled. Celeste is subrogated. Dmitri is not subrogated. Dmitri is retired. Dmitri has no dashcam. Celeste has a beneficiary. Xaver has no beneficiary. Bruno has roadside assistance. Xaver is not subrogated. Dmitri has no roadside assistance. Dmitri is not bundled. Bruno is not subrogated. Xaver has a dashcam. Bruno is not bundled. Celeste has no dashcam. Celeste is retired.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is not a claimant provided that it has a deductible waiver. Section 2: a policyholder is disputed provided that it has roadside assistance. Section 3: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it is a claimant. Section 4: a policyholder has no premium discount provided that it has a dashcam. Section 5: a policyholder is reimbursed provided that it has roadside assistance. Section 6: a policyholder has an adjuster provided that it has a beneficiary. Section 7: a policyholder has a rider provided that it is retired. Section 8: a policyholder is indemnified provided that it has an adjuster. Section 9: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it is bundled. Section 10: a policyholder has no flood coverage provided that it is indemnified. Section 11: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it has roadside assistance. Section 12: a policyholder is a claimant provided that it has a rider. Section 13: a policyholder is not indemnified provided that it is disputed. Section 14: a policyholder is not reimbursed provided that it is indemnified. Section 15: a policyholder is inspected provided that it is subrogated. Section 13 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 15 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 14. Section 12 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Celeste has flood coverage. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028306", "pair_id": "u028306-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028306-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "990e1a26b91419b3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028306-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is not retired. Celeste has no roadside assistance. Celeste is bundled. Celeste is subrogated. Dmitri is not subrogated. Dmitri is retired. Dmitri has no dashcam. Celeste has a beneficiary. Xaver has no beneficiary. Bruno has roadside assistance. Xaver is not subrogated. Dmitri has no roadside assistance. Dmitri is not bundled. Bruno is not subrogated. Xaver has a dashcam. Bruno is not bundled. Celeste has no dashcam. Celeste is retired.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is not a claimant provided that it has a deductible waiver. Section 2: a policyholder is disputed provided that it has roadside assistance. Section 3: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it is a claimant. Section 4: a policyholder has no premium discount provided that it has a dashcam. Section 5: a policyholder is reimbursed provided that it has roadside assistance. Section 6: a policyholder has an adjuster provided that it has a beneficiary. Section 7: a policyholder has a rider provided that it is retired. Section 8: a policyholder is indemnified provided that it has an adjuster. Section 9: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it is bundled. Section 10: a policyholder has no flood coverage provided that it is indemnified. Section 11: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it has roadside assistance. Section 12: a policyholder is a claimant provided that it has a rider. Section 13: a policyholder is not indemnified provided that it is disputed. Section 14: a policyholder is not reimbursed provided that it is indemnified. Section 15: a policyholder is inspected provided that it is subrogated. Section 13 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 10. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 15. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 14. Section 12 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Celeste has flood coverage. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028306", "pair_id": "u028306-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028306-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "0270a552f00dbb97", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028349-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is benchmarked. Talc is not localized. Gneiss is not benchmarked. Talc has no migration script. Mica is not documented. Basalt is localized. Talc is reverted. Basalt has no migration script. Basalt is not reverted. Talc is not documented. Mica is not reverted. Basalt is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build has no feature toggle provided that it has no migration script. Section 2: a build is not profiled provided that it is benchmarked. Section 3: a build is versioned provided that it is profiled. Section 4: a build is profiled provided that it is benchmarked. Section 5: a build has a changelog provided that it is not reverted. Section 2 lapses for a build if it is not documented. Section 1 lapses for a build if it is benchmarked. Section 2 lapses for a build if it is not localized. Section 5 lapses for a build if it is not localized. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is localized. Question: Basalt is not profiled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028349", "pair_id": "u028349-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028349-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "59ae836446fa6128", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u028349-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is benchmarked. Talc is not localized. Gneiss is not benchmarked. Talc has no migration script. Mica is not documented. Basalt is localized. Talc is reverted. Basalt has no migration script. Basalt is reverted. Talc is not documented. Mica is not reverted. Basalt is benchmarked.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build has no feature toggle provided that it has no migration script. Section 2: a build is not profiled provided that it is benchmarked. Section 3: a build is versioned provided that it is profiled. Section 4: a build is profiled provided that it is benchmarked. Section 5: a build has a changelog provided that it is not reverted. Section 2 lapses for a build if it is not documented. Section 1 lapses for a build if it is benchmarked. Section 2 lapses for a build if it is not localized. Section 5 lapses for a build if it is not localized. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is localized. Question: Basalt is not profiled. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028349", "pair_id": "u028349-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028349-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "39a299692945a4de", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a8", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u028368-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is not misrouted. Nandor is not refrigerated. Liesel is not refrigerated. Liesel is not misrouted. Nandor is not misrouted. Nandor is not oversized. Rasmus is not delayed. Nandor has a parcel volume of 87. Odile is not oversized. Odile is misrouted. Odile is not refrigerated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is not delayed, thus it is not damaged. Provision 2: when the parcel here is oversized, thus it has a waybill. Provision 3: when the parcel here is misrouted, thus it is damaged. Provision 4: when the parcel here is oversized, thus it has no waybill. Provision 5: when the parcel here is oversized, thus it is not palletized. Provision 6: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it is palletized. Provision 4 has no effect when the parcel here is not misrouted. Provision 6 has no effect when the parcel here is misrouted. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here has a parcel volume beyond 36. Provision 4 has no effect when the parcel here has a parcel volume at or below 36. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Rasmus has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028368", "pair_id": "u028368-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028368-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6bb88a319335dae8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028368-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is not misrouted. Nandor is not refrigerated. Liesel is not refrigerated. Liesel is not misrouted. Nandor is not misrouted. Nandor is not oversized. Rasmus is not delayed. Nandor has a parcel volume of 87. Rasmus is oversized. Odile is not oversized. Odile is misrouted. Odile is not refrigerated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is not delayed, thus it is not damaged. Provision 2: when the parcel here is oversized, thus it has a waybill. Provision 3: when the parcel here is misrouted, thus it is damaged. Provision 4: when the parcel here is oversized, thus it has no waybill. Provision 5: when the parcel here is oversized, thus it is not palletized. Provision 6: when the parcel here is refrigerated, thus it is palletized. Provision 4 has no effect when the parcel here is not misrouted. Provision 6 has no effect when the parcel here is misrouted. Provision 2 has no effect when the parcel here has a parcel volume beyond 36. Provision 4 has no effect when the parcel here has a parcel volume at or below 36. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 2. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Rasmus has a waybill?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028368", "pair_id": "u028368-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028368-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea04dd990af78f40", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028368-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is not misrouted. Nandor is not refrigerated. Liesel is not refrigerated. Liesel is not misrouted. Nandor is not misrouted. Nandor is not oversized. Rasmus is not delayed. Nandor has a parcel volume of 87. Odile is not oversized. Odile is misrouted. Odile is not refrigerated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not delayed, it thereby is not damaged. Point B. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby has a waybill. Point C. If said parcel is misrouted, it thereby is damaged. Point D. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby has no waybill. Point E. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby is not palletized. Point F. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby is palletized. Point D is cancelled if said parcel is not misrouted. Point F is cancelled if said parcel is misrouted. Point B is cancelled if said parcel has a parcel volume in excess of 36. Point D is cancelled if said parcel has a parcel volume of maximum 36. Point D supersedes Point B. Point E supersedes Point F. Point C supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Rasmus has a waybill. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028368", "pair_id": "u028368-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028368-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6bb88a319335dae8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028368-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rasmus is not misrouted. Nandor is not refrigerated. Liesel is not refrigerated. Liesel is not misrouted. Nandor is not misrouted. Nandor is not oversized. Rasmus is not delayed. Nandor has a parcel volume of 87. Rasmus is oversized. Odile is not oversized. Odile is misrouted. Odile is not refrigerated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not delayed, it thereby is not damaged. Point B. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby has a waybill. Point C. If said parcel is misrouted, it thereby is damaged. Point D. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby has no waybill. Point E. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby is not palletized. Point F. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby is palletized. Point D is cancelled if said parcel is not misrouted. Point F is cancelled if said parcel is misrouted. Point B is cancelled if said parcel has a parcel volume in excess of 36. Point D is cancelled if said parcel has a parcel volume of maximum 36. Point D supersedes Point B. Point E supersedes Point F. Point C supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Rasmus has a waybill. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028368", "pair_id": "u028368-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028368-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea04dd990af78f40", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028399-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has roadside assistance. Bruno is retired. Zdenek is not retired. Yara is not retired. Zdenek has no premium discount. Bruno has no premium discount.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a premium discount, then it has a beneficiary. (2) If a policyholder is retired, then it is not reimbursed. (3) If a policyholder has a premium discount, then it is not uninsurable. Question: Is it true that Yara has roadside assistance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028399", "pair_id": "u028399-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028399-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "6763cdf54509af6e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028399-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has roadside assistance. Bruno is retired. Zdenek is not retired. Yara is not retired. Yara has no premium discount. Zdenek has no premium discount. Bruno has no premium discount.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a premium discount, then it has a beneficiary. (2) If a policyholder is retired, then it is not reimbursed. (3) If a policyholder has a premium discount, then it is not uninsurable. Question: Is it true that Yara has roadside assistance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028399", "pair_id": "u028399-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028399-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "a63ff58a1519bd8a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028399-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has roadside assistance. Bruno is retired. Zdenek is not retired. Yara is not retired. Zdenek has no premium discount. Bruno has no premium discount.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 2: once any policyholder is retired, it also is not reimbursed. Clause 3: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also is not uninsurable. Question: Does it follow that Yara has roadside assistance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028399", "pair_id": "u028399-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028399-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "6763cdf54509af6e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028399-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has roadside assistance. Bruno is retired. Zdenek is not retired. Yara is not retired. Yara has no premium discount. Zdenek has no premium discount. Bruno has no premium discount.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also has a beneficiary. Clause 2: once any policyholder is retired, it also is not reimbursed. Clause 3: once any policyholder has a premium discount, it also is not uninsurable. Question: Does it follow that Yara has roadside assistance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028399", "pair_id": "u028399-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028399-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "a63ff58a1519bd8a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028399-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has roadside assistance. Bruno is retired. Zdenek is not retired. Yara is not retired. Zdenek has no premium discount. Bruno has no premium discount.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a premium discount, that policyholder has a beneficiary. Item B. When the policyholder is retired, that policyholder is not reimbursed. Item C. When the policyholder has a premium discount, that policyholder is not uninsurable. Question: Can one infer that Yara has roadside assistance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028399", "pair_id": "u028399-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028399-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "6763cdf54509af6e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028399-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zdenek has roadside assistance. Bruno is retired. Zdenek is not retired. Yara is not retired. Yara has no premium discount. Zdenek has no premium discount. Bruno has no premium discount.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a premium discount, that policyholder has a beneficiary. Item B. When the policyholder is retired, that policyholder is not reimbursed. Item C. When the policyholder has a premium discount, that policyholder is not uninsurable. Question: Can one infer that Yara has roadside assistance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028399", "pair_id": "u028399-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028399-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "a63ff58a1519bd8a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028404-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vilja is vaccinated. Zora is anemic. Zora is not rescheduled. Vilja is not rescheduled. Zora is not vaccinated. Dorian is anemic. Dorian is not rescheduled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is anemic: then it is postoperative. Policy II. Suppose that patient is rescheduled: then it is allergic. Policy III. Suppose that patient is not vaccinated: then it is fasting. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is not anemic: then it is diabetic. Policy V. Suppose that patient has a pain level no higher than 72: then it is triaged. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is vaccinated: then it is contagious. Policy VII. Suppose that patient has a pain level smaller than 20: then it is not allergic. Policy I is waived if that patient has a pain level smaller than 41. Policy V is waived if that patient has a pain level no lower than 32. Policy II is waived if that patient is not anemic. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy II. Question: Which choice is right for Vilja?", "options": ["is contagious", "is fasting", "is postoperative", "is diabetic"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is contagious", "unit_id": "u028404", "pair_id": "u028404-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028404-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "39b5476bb2fe9e11", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a7", "a4", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028404-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vilja is not vaccinated. Zora is anemic. Zora is not rescheduled. Vilja is not rescheduled. Zora is not vaccinated. Dorian is anemic. Dorian is not rescheduled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is anemic: then it is postoperative. Policy II. Suppose that patient is rescheduled: then it is allergic. Policy III. Suppose that patient is not vaccinated: then it is fasting. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is not anemic: then it is diabetic. Policy V. Suppose that patient has a pain level no higher than 72: then it is triaged. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is vaccinated: then it is contagious. Policy VII. Suppose that patient has a pain level smaller than 20: then it is not allergic. Policy I is waived if that patient has a pain level smaller than 41. Policy V is waived if that patient has a pain level no lower than 32. Policy II is waived if that patient is not anemic. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy II. Question: Which choice is right for Vilja?", "options": ["is contagious", "is fasting", "is postoperative", "is diabetic"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is fasting", "unit_id": "u028404", "pair_id": "u028404-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028404-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b439d0eaa5e00259", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a7", "a4", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028404-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vilja is vaccinated. Zora is anemic. Zora is not rescheduled. Vilja is not rescheduled. Zora is not vaccinated. Dorian is anemic. Dorian is not rescheduled.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is anemic, it then is postoperative. #2 Each time a patient is rescheduled, it then is allergic. #3 Each time a patient is not vaccinated, it then is fasting. #4 Each time a patient is not anemic, it then is diabetic. #5 Each time a patient has a pain level of 72 or below, it then is triaged. #6 Each time a patient is vaccinated, it then is contagious. #7 Each time a patient has a pain level less than 20, it then is not allergic. #1 is set aside if a patient has a pain level less than 41. #5 is set aside if a patient has a pain level of 32 or above. #2 is set aside if a patient is not anemic. #2 yields to #7. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Vilja?", "options": ["is contagious", "is fasting", "is postoperative", "is diabetic"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is contagious", "unit_id": "u028404", "pair_id": "u028404-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028404-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "39b5476bb2fe9e11", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a7", "a4", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028404-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vilja is not vaccinated. Zora is anemic. Zora is not rescheduled. Vilja is not rescheduled. Zora is not vaccinated. Dorian is anemic. Dorian is not rescheduled.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is anemic, it then is postoperative. #2 Each time a patient is rescheduled, it then is allergic. #3 Each time a patient is not vaccinated, it then is fasting. #4 Each time a patient is not anemic, it then is diabetic. #5 Each time a patient has a pain level of 72 or below, it then is triaged. #6 Each time a patient is vaccinated, it then is contagious. #7 Each time a patient has a pain level less than 20, it then is not allergic. #1 is set aside if a patient has a pain level less than 41. #5 is set aside if a patient has a pain level of 32 or above. #2 is set aside if a patient is not anemic. #2 yields to #7. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Vilja?", "options": ["is contagious", "is fasting", "is postoperative", "is diabetic"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is fasting", "unit_id": "u028404", "pair_id": "u028404-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028404-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b439d0eaa5e00259", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a7", "a4", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028405-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has an escrow account. Greta is amortized. Bastien has no guarantor. Bastien is not amortized. Greta has no escrow account. Dagny has an escrow account.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has no mortgage, it then is vetted. #2 Each time a borrower has a guarantor, it then is not a depositor. #3 Each time a borrower has no escrow account, it then is indebted. #4 Each time a borrower has a mortgage, it then is employed. #5 Each time a borrower has a mortgage, it then is not employed. #6 Each time a borrower has no escrow account, it then is refinanced. #7 Each time a borrower is not a depositor, it then has a mortgage. #1 is set aside if a borrower is amortized. #6 is set aside if a borrower is amortized. #4 is set aside if a borrower is amortized. #5 is set aside if a borrower is not amortized. #4 is set aside if a borrower is amortized. Question: Do the terms above show that Bastien is employed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028405", "pair_id": "u028405-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028405-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "36cce6403de36255", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u028405-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has an escrow account. Greta is amortized. Bastien has no guarantor. Bastien is not amortized. Greta has no escrow account. Dagny has an escrow account.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has no mortgage, it then is vetted. #2 Each time a borrower has a guarantor, it then is not a depositor. #3 Each time a borrower has an escrow account, it then is indebted. #4 Each time a borrower has a mortgage, it then is employed. #5 Each time a borrower has a mortgage, it then is not employed. #6 Each time a borrower has no escrow account, it then is refinanced. #7 Each time a borrower is not a depositor, it then has a mortgage. #1 is set aside if a borrower is amortized. #6 is set aside if a borrower is amortized. #4 is set aside if a borrower is amortized. #5 is set aside if a borrower is not amortized. #4 is set aside if a borrower is amortized. Question: Do the terms above show that Bastien is employed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028405", "pair_id": "u028405-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028405-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2bc1177701a09c38", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u028416-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is not backed up. Halcyon is stateless. Halcyon is encrypted. Halcyon is monitored. Halcyon is deprecated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally is not stateless and additionally is encrypted, it then has a dedicated host. #2 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally is stateless and additionally is backed up, it then has no dedicated host. #3 Each time a workload is not deprecated, it then is mirrored. #4 Each time a workload is monitored, it then is not throttled. Question: Do the terms above show that Halcyon has a dedicated host?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028416", "pair_id": "u028416-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028416-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "27e852aa3e0e79f8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028416-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon is not backed up. Halcyon is stateless. Halcyon is encrypted. Halcyon is monitored. Halcyon is deprecated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally is not stateless and additionally is encrypted, it then has a dedicated host. #2 Each time a workload is mirrored and additionally is stateless and additionally is backed up, it then has no dedicated host. #3 Each time a workload is deprecated, it then is mirrored. #4 Each time a workload is monitored, it then is not throttled. Question: Do the terms above show that Halcyon has a dedicated host?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028416", "pair_id": "u028416-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028416-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "2fbaa5580a1ee881", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028424-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte has no mentor. Teodor has a notice period of 68. Teodor has a mentor. Hedda has no mentor. Teodor is onboarded. Mads is onboarded.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is onboarded, then it is fingerprinted. (2) If a candidate has a seniority step below 34, then it has a background screening. (3) If a candidate has a notice period of at most 83, then it is probationary. (4) If a candidate is fingerprinted, then it is not recommended. (5) If a candidate has a seniority step below 84, then it is not fingerprinted. (6) If a candidate is onboarded, then it is not a veteran. (7) If a candidate is not certified, then it is a veteran. (8) If a candidate is fingerprinted, then it is recommended. (8) is void if the candidate has a mentor. (7) is void if the candidate has a seniority step of at most 25. (4) is void if the candidate has no mentor. (1) is void if the candidate has a mentor. When (1) and (5) clash, (1) prevails. When (6) and (7) clash, (6) prevails. When (8) and (4) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Is it true that Mads is recommended?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028424", "pair_id": "u028424-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028424-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4bf0370983b09b4b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028424-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte has no mentor. Teodor has a notice period of 68. Teodor has a mentor. Hedda has no mentor. Teodor is onboarded. Mads is onboarded.", "instruction": "(1) If a candidate is onboarded, then it is fingerprinted. (2) If a candidate has a seniority step below 34, then it has a background screening. (3) If a candidate has a notice period of at most 83, then it is probationary. (4) If a candidate is fingerprinted, then it is not recommended. (5) If a candidate has a seniority step below 84, then it is not fingerprinted. (6) If a candidate is onboarded, then it is not a veteran. (7) If a candidate is not certified, then it is a veteran. (8) If a candidate is fingerprinted, then it is recommended. (8) is void if the candidate has a mentor. (7) is void if the candidate has a seniority step of at most 25. (4) is void if the candidate has no mentor. (1) is void if the candidate has a mentor. When (1) and (5) clash, (1) prevails. When (6) and (7) clash, (6) prevails. When (4) and (8) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Mads is recommended?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028424", "pair_id": "u028424-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028424-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "aa9a58f46d16755c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028523-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is not theoretical. Electra is exploratory. Electra has no field site. Electra has a milestone total of 4.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is collaborative provided that it is budgeted. Section 2: a proposal is preregistered provided that it is budgeted. Section 3: a proposal is not collaborative provided that it is budgeted. Section 4: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it has no field site. Section 5: a proposal is interdisciplinary provided that it is theoretical. Section 6: a proposal is budgeted provided that it is not longitudinal. Section 7: a proposal is not longitudinal provided that it has a milestone total of 82 or lower. Section 4 lapses for a proposal if it is endorsed. Section 1 lapses for a proposal if it is endorsed. Section 3 lapses for a proposal if it is not exploratory. Section 6 lapses for a proposal if it has a field site. Section 1 lapses for a proposal if it is exploratory. Question: Electra is collaborative. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028523", "pair_id": "u028523-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028523-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bd4d3481b25df773", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028523-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is not theoretical. Electra is exploratory. Electra has no field site. Electra has a milestone total of 4.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is collaborative provided that it is budgeted. Section 2: a proposal is preregistered provided that it is budgeted. Section 3: a proposal is not collaborative provided that it is budgeted. Section 4: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it has no field site. Section 5: a proposal is interdisciplinary provided that it is theoretical. Section 6: a proposal is budgeted provided that it is not longitudinal. Section 7: a proposal is not longitudinal provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 82. Section 4 lapses for a proposal if it is endorsed. Section 1 lapses for a proposal if it is endorsed. Section 3 lapses for a proposal if it is not exploratory. Section 6 lapses for a proposal if it has a field site. Section 1 lapses for a proposal if it is exploratory. Question: Electra is collaborative. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028523", "pair_id": "u028523-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028523-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "885969b2892229cb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028523-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is not theoretical. Electra is exploratory. Electra has no field site. Electra has a milestone total of 4.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is budgeted: then it is collaborative. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is budgeted: then it is preregistered. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is budgeted: then it is not collaborative. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has no field site: then it has ethics clearance. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it is interdisciplinary. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is not longitudinal: then it is budgeted. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal has a milestone total no higher than 82: then it is not longitudinal. Policy IV is waived if that proposal is endorsed. Policy I is waived if that proposal is endorsed. Policy III is waived if that proposal is not exploratory. Policy VI is waived if that proposal has a field site. Policy I is waived if that proposal is exploratory. Question: Is it so that Electra is collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028523", "pair_id": "u028523-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028523-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bd4d3481b25df773", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028523-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is not theoretical. Electra is exploratory. Electra has no field site. Electra has a milestone total of 4.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is budgeted: then it is collaborative. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is budgeted: then it is preregistered. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is budgeted: then it is not collaborative. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has no field site: then it has ethics clearance. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it is interdisciplinary. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is not longitudinal: then it is budgeted. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal has a milestone total higher than 82: then it is not longitudinal. Policy IV is waived if that proposal is endorsed. Policy I is waived if that proposal is endorsed. Policy III is waived if that proposal is not exploratory. Policy VI is waived if that proposal has a field site. Policy I is waived if that proposal is exploratory. Question: Is it so that Electra is collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028523", "pair_id": "u028523-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028523-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "885969b2892229cb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028550-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna is licensed. Mads is not probationary. Mads is not eligible. Jasna has a diploma. Jasna is fingerprinted. Jasna has a background screening. Jasna has no signing bonus. Jasna is eligible. Jasna is not a graduate. Jasna is not probationary. Jasna is interviewed. Mads has a background screening. Mads has a signing bonus.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has a signing bonus while is recommended, thus it is headhunted. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a diploma while is licensed, thus it has a mentor. Provision 3: when the candidate here is a veteran, thus it is certified. Provision 4: when the candidate here is a veteran while is fingerprinted while is eligible, thus it is seasoned. Provision 5: when the candidate here has a mentor while is licensed while is probationary, thus it is a veteran. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here is a graduate while has a diploma. Provision 3 has no effect when the candidate here is interviewed. Question: Would it be right to say that Jasna is a veteran?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028550", "pair_id": "u028550-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028550-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b5260e51d52c7ef9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u028550-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna is licensed. Mads is not probationary. Mads is not eligible. Jasna has a diploma. Jasna is fingerprinted. Jasna has a background screening. Jasna has no signing bonus. Jasna is eligible. Jasna is not a graduate. Jasna is not probationary. Jasna is interviewed. Mads has a background screening. Mads has a signing bonus.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has a mentor while has a background screening while is interviewed, thus it is not a veteran. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a signing bonus while is recommended, thus it is headhunted. Provision 3: when the candidate here has a diploma while is licensed, thus it has a mentor. Provision 4: when the candidate here is a veteran, thus it is certified. Provision 5: when the candidate here is a veteran while is fingerprinted while is eligible, thus it is seasoned. Provision 6: when the candidate here has a mentor while is licensed while is probationary, thus it is a veteran. Provision 3 has no effect when the candidate here is a graduate while has a diploma. Provision 4 has no effect when the candidate here is interviewed. Question: Would it be right to say that Jasna is a veteran?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028550", "pair_id": "u028550-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028550-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f456337751fd24ae", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u028550-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna is licensed. Mads is not probationary. Mads is not eligible. Jasna has a diploma. Jasna is fingerprinted. Jasna has a background screening. Jasna has no signing bonus. Jasna is eligible. Jasna is not a graduate. Jasna is not probationary. Jasna is interviewed. Mads has a background screening. Mads has a signing bonus.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a signing bonus and further is recommended, it thereby is headhunted. Point B. If said candidate has a diploma and further is licensed, it thereby has a mentor. Point C. If said candidate is a veteran, it thereby is certified. Point D. If said candidate is a veteran and further is fingerprinted and further is eligible, it thereby is seasoned. Point E. If said candidate has a mentor and further is licensed and further is probationary, it thereby is a veteran. Point B is cancelled if said candidate is a graduate and further has a diploma. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is interviewed. Question: Statement: Jasna is a veteran. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028550", "pair_id": "u028550-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028550-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b5260e51d52c7ef9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u028550-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Jasna is licensed. Mads is not probationary. Mads is not eligible. Jasna has a diploma. Jasna is fingerprinted. Jasna has a background screening. Jasna has no signing bonus. Jasna is eligible. Jasna is not a graduate. Jasna is not probationary. Jasna is interviewed. Mads has a background screening. Mads has a signing bonus.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a mentor and further has a background screening and further is interviewed, it thereby is not a veteran. Point B. If said candidate has a signing bonus and further is recommended, it thereby is headhunted. Point C. If said candidate has a diploma and further is licensed, it thereby has a mentor. Point D. If said candidate is a veteran, it thereby is certified. Point E. If said candidate is a veteran and further is fingerprinted and further is eligible, it thereby is seasoned. Point F. If said candidate has a mentor and further is licensed and further is probationary, it thereby is a veteran. Point C is cancelled if said candidate is a graduate and further has a diploma. Point D is cancelled if said candidate is interviewed. Question: Statement: Jasna is a veteran. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028550", "pair_id": "u028550-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028550-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f456337751fd24ae", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u028560-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is reproducible.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build has a changelog, it also has no migration script. Clause 2: once any build is reproducible, it also is experimental. Clause 3: once any build is not reproducible, it also is not fuzzed. Clause 4: once any build is not reproducible, it also is linted. Question: Does it follow that Shale is not fuzzed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028560", "pair_id": "u028560-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028560-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "5d7d8b3ddf2dae6f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028560-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is reproducible.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is reproducible, it also is fuzzed. Clause 2: once any build has a changelog, it also has no migration script. Clause 3: once any build is reproducible, it also is experimental. Clause 4: once any build is not reproducible, it also is not fuzzed. Clause 5: once any build is not reproducible, it also is linted. Question: Does it follow that Shale is not fuzzed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028560", "pair_id": "u028560-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028560-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "4cb4459612395fcc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028560-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is reproducible.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a changelog, that build has no migration script. Item B. When the build is reproducible, that build is experimental. Item C. When the build is not reproducible, that build is not fuzzed. Item D. When the build is not reproducible, that build is linted. Question: Can one infer that Shale is not fuzzed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028560", "pair_id": "u028560-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028560-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "5d7d8b3ddf2dae6f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028560-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is reproducible.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is reproducible, that build is fuzzed. Item B. When the build has a changelog, that build has no migration script. Item C. When the build is reproducible, that build is experimental. Item D. When the build is not reproducible, that build is not fuzzed. Item E. When the build is not reproducible, that build is linted. Question: Can one infer that Shale is not fuzzed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028560", "pair_id": "u028560-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028560-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "4cb4459612395fcc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028594-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not peer reviewed. Capella is translational. Capella has a patent filing. Capella has no ethics clearance. Capella is exploratory.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is not longitudinal, it thereby has a postdoc. Point B. If said proposal is not translational and further is not peer reviewed and further is exploratory, it thereby is endorsed. Point C. If said proposal is peer reviewed, it thereby has no steering committee. Point D. If said proposal has no steering committee and further has no patent filing and further is not peer reviewed, it thereby is not budgeted. Point E. If said proposal is longitudinal, it thereby has seed funding. Point F. If said proposal has no ethics clearance and further is resubmitted, it thereby has no postdoc. Point G. If said proposal has no steering committee and further has a patent filing, it thereby is budgeted. Point G is cancelled if said proposal is not theoretical and further is translational. Point E is cancelled if said proposal has a patent filing. Point B is cancelled if said proposal is resubmitted. Point G supersedes Point D. Point A supersedes Point F. Question: Statement: Capella is budgeted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028594", "pair_id": "u028594-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028594-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9e73fb32acb2113a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028594-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not peer reviewed. Capella is translational. Capella has a patent filing. Capella has no ethics clearance. Capella is exploratory.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is not longitudinal, it thereby has a postdoc. Point B. If said proposal is not translational and further is not peer reviewed and further is exploratory, it thereby is endorsed. Point C. If said proposal is not peer reviewed, it thereby has no steering committee. Point D. If said proposal has no steering committee and further has no patent filing and further is not peer reviewed, it thereby is not budgeted. Point E. If said proposal is longitudinal, it thereby has seed funding. Point F. If said proposal has no ethics clearance and further is resubmitted, it thereby has no postdoc. Point G. If said proposal has no steering committee and further has a patent filing, it thereby is budgeted. Point G is cancelled if said proposal is not theoretical and further is translational. Point E is cancelled if said proposal has a patent filing. Point B is cancelled if said proposal is resubmitted. Point G supersedes Point D. Point A supersedes Point F. Question: Statement: Capella is budgeted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028594", "pair_id": "u028594-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028594-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "edbf7298ddb968db", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028594-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not peer reviewed. Capella is translational. Capella has a patent filing. Capella has no ethics clearance. Capella is exploratory.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is not longitudinal, so it has a postdoc. No. 2 While the given proposal is not translational and likewise is not peer reviewed and likewise is exploratory, so it is endorsed. No. 3 While the given proposal is peer reviewed, so it has no steering committee. No. 4 While the given proposal has no steering committee and likewise has no patent filing and likewise is not peer reviewed, so it is not budgeted. No. 5 While the given proposal is longitudinal, so it has seed funding. No. 6 While the given proposal has no ethics clearance and likewise is resubmitted, so it has no postdoc. No. 7 While the given proposal has no steering committee and likewise has a patent filing, so it is budgeted. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given proposal is not theoretical and likewise is translational. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a patent filing. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given proposal is resubmitted. No. 7 wins over No. 4. No. 1 wins over No. 6. Question: Is the claim \"Capella is budgeted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028594", "pair_id": "u028594-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028594-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9e73fb32acb2113a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028594-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not peer reviewed. Capella is translational. Capella has a patent filing. Capella has no ethics clearance. Capella is exploratory.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is not longitudinal, so it has a postdoc. No. 2 While the given proposal is not translational and likewise is not peer reviewed and likewise is exploratory, so it is endorsed. No. 3 While the given proposal is not peer reviewed, so it has no steering committee. No. 4 While the given proposal has no steering committee and likewise has no patent filing and likewise is not peer reviewed, so it is not budgeted. No. 5 While the given proposal is longitudinal, so it has seed funding. No. 6 While the given proposal has no ethics clearance and likewise is resubmitted, so it has no postdoc. No. 7 While the given proposal has no steering committee and likewise has a patent filing, so it is budgeted. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given proposal is not theoretical and likewise is translational. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a patent filing. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given proposal is resubmitted. No. 7 wins over No. 4. No. 1 wins over No. 6. Question: Is the claim \"Capella is budgeted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028594", "pair_id": "u028594-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028594-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "edbf7298ddb968db", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028608-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra is not a graduate. Petra has a signing bonus. Petra has a notice period of 52. Petra is not fingerprinted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is probationary provided that it is not a graduate as well as has a notice period of 31 or lower as well as has a commute radius lower than 35. Section 2: a candidate is licensed provided that it is not a graduate as well as has a notice period exceeding 31 as well as is fingerprinted. Section 3: a candidate is seasoned provided that it is not a graduate as well as has a visa as well as is fingerprinted. Section 4: a candidate is eligible provided that it has a signing bonus. Section 5: a candidate has a portfolio provided that it is not a graduate as well as has a commute radius lower than 86 as well as is not fingerprinted. Section 6: a candidate is relocating provided that it is not a graduate as well as has a seniority step lower than 72 as well as has a commute radius of 28 or lower. Section 7: a candidate is freelance provided that it is not a graduate as well as has a seniority step of 72 or higher. Section 8: a candidate is sponsored provided that it is not a graduate as well as is not fingerprinted. Section 2 lapses for a candidate if it has no visa. Section 8 lapses for a candidate if it is interviewed. Section 5 lapses for a candidate if it is not fingerprinted. Question: Which statement fits Petra?", "options": ["is freelance", "is probationary", "is licensed", "has a portfolio", "is seasoned", "is sponsored", "is relocating"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sponsored", "unit_id": "u028608", "pair_id": "u028608-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028608-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0ab87dda7e7335cf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a9", "a15", "a10", "a14", "a1", "a5"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u028608-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra is not a graduate. Petra has a signing bonus. Petra has a notice period of 52. Petra is fingerprinted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a candidate is probationary provided that it is not a graduate as well as has a notice period of 31 or lower as well as has a commute radius lower than 35. Section 2: a candidate is licensed provided that it is not a graduate as well as has a notice period exceeding 31 as well as is fingerprinted. Section 3: a candidate is seasoned provided that it is not a graduate as well as has a visa as well as is fingerprinted. Section 4: a candidate is eligible provided that it has a signing bonus. Section 5: a candidate has a portfolio provided that it is not a graduate as well as has a commute radius lower than 86 as well as is not fingerprinted. Section 6: a candidate is relocating provided that it is not a graduate as well as has a seniority step lower than 72 as well as has a commute radius of 28 or lower. Section 7: a candidate is freelance provided that it is not a graduate as well as has a seniority step of 72 or higher. Section 8: a candidate is sponsored provided that it is not a graduate as well as is not fingerprinted. Section 2 lapses for a candidate if it has no visa. Section 8 lapses for a candidate if it is interviewed. Section 5 lapses for a candidate if it is not fingerprinted. Question: Which statement fits Petra?", "options": ["is freelance", "is probationary", "is licensed", "has a portfolio", "is seasoned", "is sponsored", "is relocating"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is licensed", "unit_id": "u028608", "pair_id": "u028608-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028608-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "68f0a985273a3a5b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a9", "a15", "a10", "a14", "a1", "a5"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u028608-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra is not a graduate. Petra has a signing bonus. Petra has a notice period of 52. Petra is not fingerprinted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is not a graduate and additionally has a notice period of 31 or below and additionally has a commute radius less than 35, it then is probationary. #2 Each time a candidate is not a graduate and additionally has a notice period greater than 31 and additionally is fingerprinted, it then is licensed. #3 Each time a candidate is not a graduate and additionally has a visa and additionally is fingerprinted, it then is seasoned. #4 Each time a candidate has a signing bonus, it then is eligible. #5 Each time a candidate is not a graduate and additionally has a commute radius less than 86 and additionally is not fingerprinted, it then has a portfolio. #6 Each time a candidate is not a graduate and additionally has a seniority step less than 72 and additionally has a commute radius of 28 or below, it then is relocating. #7 Each time a candidate is not a graduate and additionally has a seniority step of 72 or above, it then is freelance. #8 Each time a candidate is not a graduate and additionally is not fingerprinted, it then is sponsored. #2 is set aside if a candidate has no visa. #8 is set aside if a candidate is interviewed. #5 is set aside if a candidate is not fingerprinted. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Petra?", "options": ["is freelance", "is probationary", "is licensed", "has a portfolio", "is seasoned", "is sponsored", "is relocating"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is sponsored", "unit_id": "u028608", "pair_id": "u028608-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028608-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0ab87dda7e7335cf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a9", "a15", "a10", "a14", "a1", "a5"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u028608-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra is not a graduate. Petra has a signing bonus. Petra has a notice period of 52. Petra is fingerprinted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is not a graduate and additionally has a notice period of 31 or below and additionally has a commute radius less than 35, it then is probationary. #2 Each time a candidate is not a graduate and additionally has a notice period greater than 31 and additionally is fingerprinted, it then is licensed. #3 Each time a candidate is not a graduate and additionally has a visa and additionally is fingerprinted, it then is seasoned. #4 Each time a candidate has a signing bonus, it then is eligible. #5 Each time a candidate is not a graduate and additionally has a commute radius less than 86 and additionally is not fingerprinted, it then has a portfolio. #6 Each time a candidate is not a graduate and additionally has a seniority step less than 72 and additionally has a commute radius of 28 or below, it then is relocating. #7 Each time a candidate is not a graduate and additionally has a seniority step of 72 or above, it then is freelance. #8 Each time a candidate is not a graduate and additionally is not fingerprinted, it then is sponsored. #2 is set aside if a candidate has no visa. #8 is set aside if a candidate is interviewed. #5 is set aside if a candidate is not fingerprinted. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Petra?", "options": ["is freelance", "is probationary", "is licensed", "has a portfolio", "is seasoned", "is sponsored", "is relocating"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is licensed", "unit_id": "u028608", "pair_id": "u028608-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028608-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "68f0a985273a3a5b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a9", "a15", "a10", "a14", "a1", "a5"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u028617-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is not subrogated. Viggo has a peril factor of 21. Agata is lapsed. Agata is subrogated. Viggo has a claim frequency of 77. Viggo has a premium band of 14. Agata has a payout ceiling of 26. Viggo is appraised. Viggo has a payout ceiling of 46. Agata is appraised.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is not subrogated and also has a payout ceiling under 42, it also is uninsurable. Clause 2: once any policyholder is inspected and also has a premium band under 70, it also is indemnified. Clause 3: once any policyholder is not appraised and also is not lapsed, it also has an adjuster. Clause 4: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is inspected. Clause 5: once any policyholder is inspected and also has a premium band of 70 or more and also is not lapsed, it also is not indemnified. Clause 6: once any policyholder is not subrogated and also has a peril factor of 49 or less, it also is a smoker. Clause 5 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a premium band of 68 or less and also has a claim frequency under 12. Question: Does it follow that Viggo is indemnified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028617", "pair_id": "u028617-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028617-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "10bba0937e33046d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u028617-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is not subrogated. Viggo has a peril factor of 21. Agata is lapsed. Agata is subrogated. Viggo has a claim frequency of 77. Viggo has a premium band of 14. Agata has a payout ceiling of 26. Viggo is appraised. Viggo has a payout ceiling of 46. Agata is appraised.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is not subrogated and also has a payout ceiling under 42, it also is uninsurable. Clause 2: once any policyholder is inspected and also has a premium band under 70, it also is indemnified. Clause 3: once any policyholder is not appraised and also is not lapsed, it also has an adjuster. Clause 4: once any policyholder is a smoker, it also is inspected. Clause 5: once any policyholder is inspected and also has a premium band of 70 or more and also is not lapsed, it also is not indemnified. Clause 6: once any policyholder is subrogated and also has a peril factor of 49 or less, it also is a smoker. Clause 5 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a premium band of 68 or less and also has a claim frequency under 12. Question: Does it follow that Viggo is indemnified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028617", "pair_id": "u028617-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028617-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2d77e6374370085a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u028631-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach is not a pilot study. Fomalhaut is longitudinal. Fomalhaut has no field site. Fomalhaut is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse is not translational. Mirach is translational. Betelgeuse is a pilot study. Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Betelgeuse has no field site. Fomalhaut is translational. Mirach has seed funding.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is peer reviewed. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is longitudinal: then it has no ethics clearance. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is translational: then it is not peer reviewed. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is renewed: then it is shortlisted. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is shortlisted: then it has no patent filing. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has a field site: then it has ethics clearance. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal has no ethics clearance: then it is theoretical. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal has a field site: then it is not theoretical. Policy IX. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it has a patent filing. Policy X. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it is renewed. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy IX. Question: Is it so that Fomalhaut has no patent filing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028631", "pair_id": "u028631-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028631-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9aaa956fb81e7683", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028631-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach is not a pilot study. Fomalhaut is longitudinal. Fomalhaut has no field site. Fomalhaut is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse is not translational. Mirach is translational. Betelgeuse is a pilot study. Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Betelgeuse has no field site. Fomalhaut is translational. Mirach has seed funding.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is peer reviewed. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is longitudinal: then it has no ethics clearance. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is translational: then it is not peer reviewed. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is renewed: then it is shortlisted. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is shortlisted: then it has no patent filing. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal has a field site: then it has ethics clearance. Policy VII. Suppose that proposal has ethics clearance: then it is theoretical. Policy VIII. Suppose that proposal has a field site: then it is not theoretical. Policy IX. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it has a patent filing. Policy X. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it is renewed. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VIII. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy IX. Question: Is it so that Fomalhaut has no patent filing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028631", "pair_id": "u028631-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028631-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "367270dad1cd59c0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028642-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is reproducible. Obsidian is not linted. Gneiss is experimental. Gneiss is flaky. Talc is not experimental. Obsidian is flaky. Obsidian is benchmarked. Talc is benchmarked. Obsidian is not experimental. Gneiss is reproducible.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is linted, thus it is not minified. Provision 2: when the build here is flaky, thus it is notarized. Provision 3: when the build here is not linted, thus it is minified. Provision 4: when the build here is experimental, thus it is not profiled. Provision 5: when the build here is flaky, thus it is not notarized. Provision 6: when the build here is flaky, thus it is obsolete. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here is benchmarked. Provision 2 has no effect when the build here is flaky. Provision 6 has no effect when the build here is versioned. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here is reproducible. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here is versioned. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Obsidian is not minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028642", "pair_id": "u028642-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028642-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c229e8cbfeba1bbf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028642-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is reproducible. Obsidian is not linted. Gneiss is experimental. Gneiss is flaky. Talc is not experimental. Obsidian is flaky. Obsidian is benchmarked. Talc is benchmarked. Obsidian is not experimental. Gneiss is reproducible.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is linted, thus it is not minified. Provision 2: when the build here is flaky, thus it is notarized. Provision 3: when the build here is linted, thus it is minified. Provision 4: when the build here is experimental, thus it is not profiled. Provision 5: when the build here is flaky, thus it is not notarized. Provision 6: when the build here is flaky, thus it is obsolete. Provision 1 has no effect when the build here is benchmarked. Provision 2 has no effect when the build here is flaky. Provision 6 has no effect when the build here is versioned. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here is reproducible. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here is versioned. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Obsidian is not minified?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028642", "pair_id": "u028642-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028642-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "690c03ddf5cb4e91", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028668-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena has a defect tally of 97. Obsidian has no security advisory. Shale is notarized. Obsidian is experimental. Shale has no migration script. Galena is experimental. Shale is reverted. Obsidian has a defect tally of 98. Shale is experimental. Obsidian is notarized. Galena is notarized. Obsidian has no migration script. Basalt has no security advisory. Basalt is experimental. Obsidian is not reverted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is linted provided that it has a defect tally of 82 or lower. Section 2: a build is obsolete provided that it has a security advisory. Section 3: a build is merged provided that it is benchmarked. Section 4: a build is benchmarked provided that it is notarized. Section 5: a build is tested provided that it is merged. Section 6: a build is not tested provided that it is versioned. Section 7: a build is not benchmarked provided that it has a migration script. Section 8: a build has a changelog provided that it is not experimental. Section 9: a build is tagged provided that it has a migration script. Section 10: a build is not versioned provided that it is reverted. Section 11: a build is versioned provided that it is obsolete. Section 12: a build is not obsolete provided that it has a defect tally of 23 or higher. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 11. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 12. Question: Obsidian is tested. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028668", "pair_id": "u028668-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028668-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e3800bc3257e7bd6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028668-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena has a defect tally of 97. Obsidian has no security advisory. Shale is notarized. Obsidian is experimental. Shale has no migration script. Galena is experimental. Shale is reverted. Obsidian has a defect tally of 98. Shale is experimental. Obsidian is notarized. Galena is notarized. Obsidian has no migration script. Basalt has no security advisory. Basalt is experimental. Obsidian is not reverted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is linted provided that it has a defect tally of 82 or lower. Section 2: a build is obsolete provided that it has a security advisory. Section 3: a build is merged provided that it is benchmarked. Section 4: a build is benchmarked provided that it is notarized. Section 5: a build is tested provided that it is merged. Section 6: a build is not tested provided that it is versioned. Section 7: a build is not benchmarked provided that it has a migration script. Section 8: a build has a changelog provided that it is experimental. Section 9: a build is tagged provided that it has a migration script. Section 10: a build is not versioned provided that it is reverted. Section 11: a build is versioned provided that it is obsolete. Section 12: a build is not obsolete provided that it has a defect tally of 23 or higher. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 11. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 5. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 12. Question: Obsidian is tested. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028668", "pair_id": "u028668-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028668-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "708d027f26142cab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028668-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena has a defect tally of 97. Obsidian has no security advisory. Shale is notarized. Obsidian is experimental. Shale has no migration script. Galena is experimental. Shale is reverted. Obsidian has a defect tally of 98. Shale is experimental. Obsidian is notarized. Galena is notarized. Obsidian has no migration script. Basalt has no security advisory. Basalt is experimental. Obsidian is not reverted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a defect tally of 82 or below, it then is linted. #2 Each time a build has a security advisory, it then is obsolete. #3 Each time a build is benchmarked, it then is merged. #4 Each time a build is notarized, it then is benchmarked. #5 Each time a build is merged, it then is tested. #6 Each time a build is versioned, it then is not tested. #7 Each time a build has a migration script, it then is not benchmarked. #8 Each time a build is not experimental, it then has a changelog. #9 Each time a build has a migration script, it then is tagged. #10 Each time a build is reverted, it then is not versioned. #11 Each time a build is obsolete, it then is versioned. #12 Each time a build has a defect tally of 23 or above, it then is not obsolete. #11 yields to #10. #5 yields to #6. #4 yields to #7. #12 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Obsidian is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028668", "pair_id": "u028668-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028668-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e3800bc3257e7bd6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028668-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena has a defect tally of 97. Obsidian has no security advisory. Shale is notarized. Obsidian is experimental. Shale has no migration script. Galena is experimental. Shale is reverted. Obsidian has a defect tally of 98. Shale is experimental. Obsidian is notarized. Galena is notarized. Obsidian has no migration script. Basalt has no security advisory. Basalt is experimental. Obsidian is not reverted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build has a defect tally of 82 or below, it then is linted. #2 Each time a build has a security advisory, it then is obsolete. #3 Each time a build is benchmarked, it then is merged. #4 Each time a build is notarized, it then is benchmarked. #5 Each time a build is merged, it then is tested. #6 Each time a build is versioned, it then is not tested. #7 Each time a build has a migration script, it then is not benchmarked. #8 Each time a build is experimental, it then has a changelog. #9 Each time a build has a migration script, it then is tagged. #10 Each time a build is reverted, it then is not versioned. #11 Each time a build is obsolete, it then is versioned. #12 Each time a build has a defect tally of 23 or above, it then is not obsolete. #11 yields to #10. #5 yields to #6. #4 yields to #7. #12 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Obsidian is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028668", "pair_id": "u028668-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028668-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "708d027f26142cab", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028674-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not discharged. Xenia has a mobility rank of 18. Xenia is hypertensive. Xenia has a fever reading of 80. Xenia has no caregiver.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient has a mobility rank of at most 32, then it is anemic. (2) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is not symptomatic. (3) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is symptomatic. (4) If a patient is discharged, then it is waitlisted. (5) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is not pregnant. (4) is void if the patient has a caregiver. (2) is void if the patient has a fever reading of at most 81. (5) is void if the patient is hypertensive. (3) is void if the patient has a fever reading above 62. (3) is void if the patient has a caregiver. Question: Is it true that Xenia is not symptomatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028674", "pair_id": "u028674-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028674-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ab0de69df7d78a0b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028674-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not discharged. Xenia has a mobility rank of 18. Xenia is hypertensive. Xenia has a fever reading of 80. Xenia has no caregiver.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient has a mobility rank of at most 32, then it is anemic. (2) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is not symptomatic. (3) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is symptomatic. (4) If a patient is discharged, then it is waitlisted. (5) If a patient is hypertensive, then it is not pregnant. (4) is void if the patient has a caregiver. (2) is void if the patient has a fever reading of at most 62. (5) is void if the patient is hypertensive. (3) is void if the patient has a fever reading above 62. (3) is void if the patient has a caregiver. Question: Is it true that Xenia is not symptomatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028674", "pair_id": "u028674-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028674-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d108d3862ff1c88b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028674-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not discharged. Xenia has a mobility rank of 18. Xenia is hypertensive. Xenia has a fever reading of 80. Xenia has no caregiver.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a mobility rank of 32 or less, it also is anemic. Clause 2: once any patient is hypertensive, it also is not symptomatic. Clause 3: once any patient is hypertensive, it also is symptomatic. Clause 4: once any patient is discharged, it also is waitlisted. Clause 5: once any patient is hypertensive, it also is not pregnant. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a caregiver. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a fever reading of 81 or less. Clause 5 does not hold for a patient when any patient is hypertensive. Clause 3 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a fever reading over 62. Clause 3 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a caregiver. Question: Does it follow that Xenia is not symptomatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028674", "pair_id": "u028674-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028674-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ab0de69df7d78a0b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028674-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not discharged. Xenia has a mobility rank of 18. Xenia is hypertensive. Xenia has a fever reading of 80. Xenia has no caregiver.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a mobility rank of 32 or less, it also is anemic. Clause 2: once any patient is hypertensive, it also is not symptomatic. Clause 3: once any patient is hypertensive, it also is symptomatic. Clause 4: once any patient is discharged, it also is waitlisted. Clause 5: once any patient is hypertensive, it also is not pregnant. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a caregiver. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a fever reading of 62 or less. Clause 5 does not hold for a patient when any patient is hypertensive. Clause 3 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a fever reading over 62. Clause 3 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a caregiver. Question: Does it follow that Xenia is not symptomatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028674", "pair_id": "u028674-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028674-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d108d3862ff1c88b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028674-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not discharged. Xenia has a mobility rank of 18. Xenia is hypertensive. Xenia has a fever reading of 80. Xenia has no caregiver.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient has a mobility rank of no more than 32, that patient is anemic. Item B. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient is not symptomatic. Item C. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient is symptomatic. Item D. When the patient is discharged, that patient is waitlisted. Item E. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient is not pregnant. Item D is suspended when the patient has a caregiver. Item B is suspended when the patient has a fever reading of no more than 81. Item E is suspended when the patient is hypertensive. Item C is suspended when the patient has a fever reading of more than 62. Item C is suspended when the patient has a caregiver. Question: Can one infer that Xenia is not symptomatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028674", "pair_id": "u028674-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028674-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ab0de69df7d78a0b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028674-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not discharged. Xenia has a mobility rank of 18. Xenia is hypertensive. Xenia has a fever reading of 80. Xenia has no caregiver.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient has a mobility rank of no more than 32, that patient is anemic. Item B. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient is not symptomatic. Item C. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient is symptomatic. Item D. When the patient is discharged, that patient is waitlisted. Item E. When the patient is hypertensive, that patient is not pregnant. Item D is suspended when the patient has a caregiver. Item B is suspended when the patient has a fever reading of no more than 62. Item E is suspended when the patient is hypertensive. Item C is suspended when the patient has a fever reading of more than 62. Item C is suspended when the patient has a caregiver. Question: Can one infer that Xenia is not symptomatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028674", "pair_id": "u028674-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028674-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d108d3862ff1c88b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028681-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid has a diploma. Rune is not certified. Sigrid has a mentor. Petra is not headhunted. Petra has a diploma. Rune is headhunted. Rune is onboarded. Petra has a mentor. Sigrid is headhunted. Rune has no mentor. Sigrid has a commute radius of 20. Rune has a diploma.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is certified, thus it is a veteran. Provision 2: when the candidate here is headhunted, thus it is bilingual. Provision 3: when the candidate here has a mentor, thus it is not freelance. Provision 4: when the candidate here is a veteran, thus it is not relocating. Provision 5: when the candidate here is relocating, thus it is sponsored. Provision 6: when the candidate here is a veteran, thus it is relocating. Provision 6 has no effect when the candidate here has a commute radius at or above 16. Provision 3 has no effect when the candidate here is onboarded. Provision 6 has no effect when the candidate here has a diploma. Provision 4 has no effect when the candidate here has no diploma. Question: Would it be right to say that Rune is relocating?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028681", "pair_id": "u028681-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028681-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ea97aedc0a12e022", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028681-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid has a diploma. Rune is not certified. Sigrid has a mentor. Petra is not headhunted. Petra has a diploma. Rune is headhunted. Rune is onboarded. Petra has a mentor. Sigrid is headhunted. Rune has no mentor. Sigrid has a commute radius of 20. Rune has a diploma.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here is certified, thus it is a veteran. Provision 2: when the candidate here is not headhunted, thus it is bilingual. Provision 3: when the candidate here has a mentor, thus it is not freelance. Provision 4: when the candidate here is a veteran, thus it is not relocating. Provision 5: when the candidate here is relocating, thus it is sponsored. Provision 6: when the candidate here is a veteran, thus it is relocating. Provision 6 has no effect when the candidate here has a commute radius at or above 16. Provision 3 has no effect when the candidate here is onboarded. Provision 6 has no effect when the candidate here has a diploma. Provision 4 has no effect when the candidate here has no diploma. Question: Would it be right to say that Rune is relocating?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028681", "pair_id": "u028681-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028681-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "389f599570805f7b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028686-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is not eligible. Rune has an aptitude quotient of 79. Mads is not a veteran. Mads has an aptitude quotient of 40. Mads is not probationary. Rune is not fingerprinted. Mads is fingerprinted. Teodor has an aptitude quotient of 34. Teodor is not probationary.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is probationary, it then has a background screening. #2 Each time a candidate is a veteran, it then has a visa. #3 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient of 41 or above, it then is bilingual. #4 Each time a candidate is not bilingual, it then is not seasoned. #5 Each time a candidate is eligible, it then is not relocating. #6 Each time a candidate is fingerprinted, it then is not interviewed. #7 Each time a candidate has a background screening, it then is seasoned. Question: Do the terms above show that Rune is seasoned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028686", "pair_id": "u028686-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028686-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "3965d73c4f3b8f09", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028686-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Rune is not eligible. Rune has an aptitude quotient of 79. Mads is not a veteran. Mads has an aptitude quotient of 40. Mads is not probationary. Rune is not fingerprinted. Mads is fingerprinted. Teodor has an aptitude quotient of 34. Teodor is not probationary.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is probationary, it then has a background screening. #2 Each time a candidate is a veteran, it then has a visa. #3 Each time a candidate has an aptitude quotient of 41 or above, it then is bilingual. #4 Each time a candidate is bilingual, it then is not seasoned. #5 Each time a candidate is eligible, it then is not relocating. #6 Each time a candidate is fingerprinted, it then is not interviewed. #7 Each time a candidate has a background screening, it then is seasoned. Question: Do the terms above show that Rune is seasoned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028686", "pair_id": "u028686-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028686-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "58da7a25ae47704b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028687-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is not sedated. Gunnar is not sedated. Wendel is not contagious.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is sedated, it then is not rescheduled. #2 Each time a patient is vaccinated, it then is hypertensive. #3 Each time a patient is vaccinated, it then is rescheduled. #1 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Wendel is contagious?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028687", "pair_id": "u028687-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028687-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "91db94971e4959e7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028687-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is not sedated. Gunnar is not sedated. Wendel is not contagious. Wendel is not vaccinated.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is sedated, it then is not rescheduled. #2 Each time a patient is vaccinated, it then is hypertensive. #3 Each time a patient is vaccinated, it then is rescheduled. #1 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Wendel is contagious?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028687", "pair_id": "u028687-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028687-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "c5e68554c7921025", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028689-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not flaky. Galena is merged. Galena has a patch cycle of 96. Galena is not obsolete.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a patch cycle beyond 77, thus it is fuzzed. Provision 2: when the build here is profiled, thus it is documented. Provision 3: when the build here is documented, thus it is not tested. Provision 4: when the build here has a test yield at or above 25, thus it is reverted. Provision 5: when the build here is reverted, thus it is not documented. Provision 6: when the build here has a security advisory, thus it is notarized. Provision 7: when the build here is merged, thus it is profiled. Provision 8: when the build here is backported, thus it is tested. Provision 9: when the build here is flaky, thus it has no feature toggle. Provision 10: when the build here is documented, thus it is linted. Provision 11: when the build here is obsolete, thus it is not fuzzed. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 11. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Would it be right to say that Galena is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028689", "pair_id": "u028689-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028689-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "968c1cedde328cb6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028689-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is not flaky. Galena is merged. Galena has a patch cycle of 96. Galena is not obsolete.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a patch cycle beyond 77, thus it is fuzzed. Provision 2: when the build here is profiled, thus it is documented. Provision 3: when the build here is documented, thus it is not tested. Provision 4: when the build here has a test yield at or above 25, thus it is reverted. Provision 5: when the build here is reverted, thus it is not documented. Provision 6: when the build here has a security advisory, thus it is notarized. Provision 7: when the build here is merged, thus it is profiled. Provision 8: when the build here is backported, thus it is tested. Provision 9: when the build here is fuzzed, thus it is backported. Provision 10: when the build here is flaky, thus it has no feature toggle. Provision 11: when the build here is documented, thus it is linted. Provision 12: when the build here is obsolete, thus it is not fuzzed. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 12. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Would it be right to say that Galena is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028689", "pair_id": "u028689-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028689-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9640edc168ca681d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u028696-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is longitudinal. Hadar is not interdisciplinary. Electra is interdisciplinary. Electra is not a pilot study. Hadar is longitudinal. Hadar is theoretical. Izar is a pilot study. Electra is not theoretical.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is exploratory provided that it is cofunded. Section 2: a proposal is cofunded provided that it is not longitudinal. Section 3: a proposal is not multicenter provided that it is not theoretical. Section 4: a proposal has no postdoc provided that it is exploratory. Section 5: a proposal is budgeted provided that it is multicenter. Section 6: a proposal has a postdoc provided that it has industry backing. Section 7: a proposal is renewed provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 8: a proposal has no ethics clearance provided that it is not a pilot study. Section 9: a proposal has industry backing provided that it is multicenter. Question: Electra has no postdoc. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028696", "pair_id": "u028696-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028696-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "590e5ffb52262c24", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028696-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is longitudinal. Hadar is not interdisciplinary. Electra is interdisciplinary. Electra is not a pilot study. Hadar is longitudinal. Hadar is theoretical. Izar is a pilot study. Electra is not theoretical.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is exploratory provided that it is cofunded. Section 2: a proposal is cofunded provided that it is not longitudinal. Section 3: a proposal is not multicenter provided that it is not theoretical. Section 4: a proposal has no postdoc provided that it is exploratory. Section 5: a proposal is budgeted provided that it is multicenter. Section 6: a proposal has a postdoc provided that it has industry backing. Section 7: a proposal is renewed provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 8: a proposal has no ethics clearance provided that it is not a pilot study. Section 9: a proposal has industry backing provided that it is not multicenter. Question: Electra has no postdoc. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028696", "pair_id": "u028696-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028696-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "f35fa5ec0ed36243", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028731-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has no snapshot. Sierra is not provisioned. Zephyr is provisioned. Sierra has a snapshot. Borealis is not backed up. Borealis has no snapshot. Zephyr is not backed up. Borealis is provisioned.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a firewall, it thereby has a GPU. Point B. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby has a firewall. Point C. If said workload is backed up, it thereby has a dedicated host. Point D. If said workload has a snapshot, it thereby is stateless. Point E. If said workload is patched, it thereby is not encrypted. Point F. If said workload has no GPU, it thereby is encrypted. Point G. If said workload is stateless, it thereby is patched. Question: Statement: Zephyr is encrypted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028731", "pair_id": "u028731-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028731-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "4e0fd266185ce82c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028731-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has no snapshot. Sierra is not provisioned. Zephyr is provisioned. Sierra has a snapshot. Borealis is not backed up. Borealis has no snapshot. Zephyr is not backed up. Borealis is provisioned.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a firewall, it thereby has a GPU. Point B. If said workload is provisioned, it thereby has a firewall. Point C. If said workload is backed up, it thereby has a dedicated host. Point D. If said workload has a snapshot, it thereby is stateless. Point E. If said workload is patched, it thereby is not encrypted. Point F. If said workload has a GPU, it thereby is encrypted. Point G. If said workload is stateless, it thereby is patched. Question: Statement: Zephyr is encrypted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028731", "pair_id": "u028731-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028731-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "6853262b20a09e1a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028732-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a mortgage. Wiebke has no mortgage. Wiebke is creditworthy. Ilse is creditworthy. Wiebke has no escrow account. Ilse is not pensioned. Wiebke is a depositor. Wiebke is not pensioned.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is indebted, then it is not amortized. (2) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it is foreclosed. (3) If a borrower is bankrupt, then it has a guarantor. (4) If a borrower is a depositor, then it is bankrupt. (5) If a borrower is bankrupt, then it has no guarantor. (6) If a borrower has an escrow account, then it is solvent. (7) If a borrower is pensioned, then it is not foreclosed. (8) If a borrower is pensioned, then it is not solvent. (9) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it is amortized. (3) is void if the borrower has a mortgage. (2) is void if the borrower has a mortgage. (3) is void if the borrower is creditworthy. (5) is void if the borrower is pensioned. (5) is void if the borrower has a mortgage. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. When (9) and (1) clash, (9) prevails. When (8) and (6) clash, (8) prevails. When (2) and (7) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Wiebke has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028732", "pair_id": "u028732-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028732-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "994ddfd459a63fe8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028732-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a mortgage. Wiebke has no mortgage. Wiebke is creditworthy. Ilse is creditworthy. Wiebke has no escrow account. Wiebke is indebted. Ilse is not pensioned. Wiebke is a depositor. Wiebke is not pensioned.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is indebted, then it is not amortized. (2) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it is foreclosed. (3) If a borrower is bankrupt, then it has a guarantor. (4) If a borrower is a depositor, then it is bankrupt. (5) If a borrower is bankrupt, then it has no guarantor. (6) If a borrower has an escrow account, then it is solvent. (7) If a borrower is pensioned, then it is not foreclosed. (8) If a borrower is pensioned, then it is not solvent. (9) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it is amortized. (3) is void if the borrower has a mortgage. (2) is void if the borrower has a mortgage. (3) is void if the borrower is creditworthy. (5) is void if the borrower is pensioned. (5) is void if the borrower has a mortgage. When (3) and (5) clash, (3) prevails. When (9) and (1) clash, (9) prevails. When (8) and (6) clash, (8) prevails. When (2) and (7) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Wiebke has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028732", "pair_id": "u028732-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028732-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ad945e9dbfaed771", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028732-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a mortgage. Wiebke has no mortgage. Wiebke is creditworthy. Ilse is creditworthy. Wiebke has no escrow account. Ilse is not pensioned. Wiebke is a depositor. Wiebke is not pensioned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is indebted, it also is not amortized. Clause 2: once any borrower has a mortgage, it also is foreclosed. Clause 3: once any borrower is bankrupt, it also has a guarantor. Clause 4: once any borrower is a depositor, it also is bankrupt. Clause 5: once any borrower is bankrupt, it also has no guarantor. Clause 6: once any borrower has an escrow account, it also is solvent. Clause 7: once any borrower is pensioned, it also is not foreclosed. Clause 8: once any borrower is pensioned, it also is not solvent. Clause 9: once any borrower has a mortgage, it also is amortized. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a mortgage. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a mortgage. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is creditworthy. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is pensioned. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a mortgage. Clause 3 overrides Clause 5. Clause 9 overrides Clause 1. Clause 8 overrides Clause 6. Clause 2 overrides Clause 7. Question: Does it follow that Wiebke has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028732", "pair_id": "u028732-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028732-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "994ddfd459a63fe8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028732-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a mortgage. Wiebke has no mortgage. Wiebke is creditworthy. Ilse is creditworthy. Wiebke has no escrow account. Wiebke is indebted. Ilse is not pensioned. Wiebke is a depositor. Wiebke is not pensioned.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is indebted, it also is not amortized. Clause 2: once any borrower has a mortgage, it also is foreclosed. Clause 3: once any borrower is bankrupt, it also has a guarantor. Clause 4: once any borrower is a depositor, it also is bankrupt. Clause 5: once any borrower is bankrupt, it also has no guarantor. Clause 6: once any borrower has an escrow account, it also is solvent. Clause 7: once any borrower is pensioned, it also is not foreclosed. Clause 8: once any borrower is pensioned, it also is not solvent. Clause 9: once any borrower has a mortgage, it also is amortized. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a mortgage. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a mortgage. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is creditworthy. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is pensioned. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a mortgage. Clause 3 overrides Clause 5. Clause 9 overrides Clause 1. Clause 8 overrides Clause 6. Clause 2 overrides Clause 7. Question: Does it follow that Wiebke has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028732", "pair_id": "u028732-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028732-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ad945e9dbfaed771", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028775-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc has a lint backlog of 19. Shale has a lint backlog of 39. Talc is backported. Galena has a test yield of 67. Shale is not backported. Zircon has no changelog. Zircon is backported. Shale has a changelog. Zircon has a test yield of 2. Shale has a test yield of 53. Talc has a test yield of 53. Talc has a changelog.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is reproducible provided that it has a feature toggle. Section 2: a build is not tagged provided that it has a changelog. Section 3: a build is not reproducible provided that it has a feature toggle. Section 4: a build is linted provided that it has a lint backlog exceeding 85. Section 5: a build is documented provided that it has a changelog. Section 6: a build has a feature toggle provided that it is linted. Section 5 lapses for a build if it has a test yield lower than 54. Section 6 lapses for a build if it is not backported. Section 1 lapses for a build if it has a defect tally lower than 84. Section 1 lapses for a build if it is not backported. Section 3 lapses for a build if it is backported. Question: Talc is reproducible. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028775", "pair_id": "u028775-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028775-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2210b46500a1305e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028775-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc has a lint backlog of 19. Shale has a lint backlog of 39. Talc is backported. Galena has a test yield of 67. Shale is not backported. Zircon has no changelog. Zircon is backported. Shale has a changelog. Zircon has a test yield of 2. Shale has a test yield of 53. Talc has a test yield of 53. Talc has a changelog.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is reproducible provided that it has a feature toggle. Section 2: a build is not tagged provided that it has a changelog. Section 3: a build is not reproducible provided that it has a feature toggle. Section 4: a build is linted provided that it has a lint backlog exceeding 85. Section 5: a build is documented provided that it has a changelog. Section 6: a build has a feature toggle provided that it is linted. Section 5 lapses for a build if it has a test yield lower than 52. Section 6 lapses for a build if it is not backported. Section 1 lapses for a build if it has a defect tally lower than 84. Section 1 lapses for a build if it is not backported. Section 3 lapses for a build if it is backported. Question: Talc is reproducible. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028775", "pair_id": "u028775-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028775-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "232b9b3a8c9cd7aa", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028775-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc has a lint backlog of 19. Shale has a lint backlog of 39. Talc is backported. Galena has a test yield of 67. Shale is not backported. Zircon has no changelog. Zircon is backported. Shale has a changelog. Zircon has a test yield of 2. Shale has a test yield of 53. Talc has a test yield of 53. Talc has a changelog.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a feature toggle: then it is reproducible. Policy II. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is not tagged. Policy III. Suppose that build has a feature toggle: then it is not reproducible. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a lint backlog higher than 85: then it is linted. Policy V. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is documented. Policy VI. Suppose that build is linted: then it has a feature toggle. Policy V is waived if that build has a test yield smaller than 54. Policy VI is waived if that build is not backported. Policy I is waived if that build has a defect tally smaller than 84. Policy I is waived if that build is not backported. Policy III is waived if that build is backported. Question: Is it so that Talc is reproducible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028775", "pair_id": "u028775-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028775-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2210b46500a1305e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028775-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc has a lint backlog of 19. Shale has a lint backlog of 39. Talc is backported. Galena has a test yield of 67. Shale is not backported. Zircon has no changelog. Zircon is backported. Shale has a changelog. Zircon has a test yield of 2. Shale has a test yield of 53. Talc has a test yield of 53. Talc has a changelog.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a feature toggle: then it is reproducible. Policy II. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is not tagged. Policy III. Suppose that build has a feature toggle: then it is not reproducible. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a lint backlog higher than 85: then it is linted. Policy V. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is documented. Policy VI. Suppose that build is linted: then it has a feature toggle. Policy V is waived if that build has a test yield smaller than 52. Policy VI is waived if that build is not backported. Policy I is waived if that build has a defect tally smaller than 84. Policy I is waived if that build is not backported. Policy III is waived if that build is backported. Question: Is it so that Talc is reproducible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028775", "pair_id": "u028775-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/0/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028775-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "232b9b3a8c9cd7aa", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028779-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a lint backlog of 43. Feldspar has a security advisory. Zircon has a defect tally of 24. Shale has a defect tally of 66. Zircon has a security advisory. Zircon is not reverted. Feldspar has a patch cycle of 61. Zircon is tagged. Zircon is tested. Feldspar is not reverted. Shale is tested. Shale is reverted. Shale is not tagged. Feldspar is tagged.", "instruction": "(1) If a build has a lint backlog above 70, then it has a migration script. (2) If a build has a defect tally below 27 and has a lint backlog of at least 67 and has a patch cycle below 48, then it is flaky. (3) If a build has a security advisory and is tagged and has a lint backlog of at most 12, then it is not documented. (4) If a build has a defect tally below 27 and has a lint backlog below 43 and is tested, then it is not flaky. (3) is void if the build is not tagged. (4) is void if the build has a lint backlog of at least 68 and is tagged. (1) is void if the build is not reverted. Question: Is it true that Zircon is flaky?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028779", "pair_id": "u028779-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028779-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bd5ecce240ab2a05", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028779-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a lint backlog of 43. Feldspar has a security advisory. Zircon has a defect tally of 24. Shale has a defect tally of 66. Zircon has a security advisory. Zircon is not reverted. Feldspar has a patch cycle of 61. Zircon is tagged. Zircon is tested. Feldspar is not reverted. Shale is tested. Shale is reverted. Shale is not tagged. Feldspar is tagged.", "instruction": "(1) If a build has a lint backlog above 70, then it has a migration script. (2) If a build has a defect tally below 27 and has a lint backlog of at least 67 and has a patch cycle below 48, then it is flaky. (3) If a build has a security advisory and is tagged and has a lint backlog of at most 12, then it is not documented. (4) If a build has a defect tally below 27 and has a lint backlog below 67 and is tested, then it is not flaky. (3) is void if the build is not tagged. (4) is void if the build has a lint backlog of at least 68 and is tagged. (1) is void if the build is not reverted. Question: Is it true that Zircon is flaky?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028779", "pair_id": "u028779-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028779-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "dff00dacd6ebb196", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028779-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a lint backlog of 43. Feldspar has a security advisory. Zircon has a defect tally of 24. Shale has a defect tally of 66. Zircon has a security advisory. Zircon is not reverted. Feldspar has a patch cycle of 61. Zircon is tagged. Zircon is tested. Feldspar is not reverted. Shale is tested. Shale is reverted. Shale is not tagged. Feldspar is tagged.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a lint backlog of more than 70, that build has a migration script. Item B. When the build has a defect tally of less than 27, and has a lint backlog of no less than 67, and has a patch cycle of less than 48, that build is flaky. Item C. When the build has a security advisory, and is tagged, and has a lint backlog of no more than 12, that build is not documented. Item D. When the build has a defect tally of less than 27, and has a lint backlog of less than 43, and is tested, that build is not flaky. Item C is suspended when the build is not tagged. Item D is suspended when the build has a lint backlog of no less than 68, and is tagged. Item A is suspended when the build is not reverted. Question: Can one infer that Zircon is flaky?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028779", "pair_id": "u028779-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028779-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bd5ecce240ab2a05", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028779-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon has a lint backlog of 43. Feldspar has a security advisory. Zircon has a defect tally of 24. Shale has a defect tally of 66. Zircon has a security advisory. Zircon is not reverted. Feldspar has a patch cycle of 61. Zircon is tagged. Zircon is tested. Feldspar is not reverted. Shale is tested. Shale is reverted. Shale is not tagged. Feldspar is tagged.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a lint backlog of more than 70, that build has a migration script. Item B. When the build has a defect tally of less than 27, and has a lint backlog of no less than 67, and has a patch cycle of less than 48, that build is flaky. Item C. When the build has a security advisory, and is tagged, and has a lint backlog of no more than 12, that build is not documented. Item D. When the build has a defect tally of less than 27, and has a lint backlog of less than 67, and is tested, that build is not flaky. Item C is suspended when the build is not tagged. Item D is suspended when the build has a lint backlog of no less than 68, and is tagged. Item A is suspended when the build is not reverted. Question: Can one infer that Zircon is flaky?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028779", "pair_id": "u028779-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028779-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "dff00dacd6ebb196", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028786-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is not tagged. Obsidian has a migration script. Mica is not backported. Obsidian is tested. Schist has no migration script. Schist has a feature toggle. Obsidian has no changelog. Schist has a changelog. Schist is flaky. Schist is not tagged. Mica is not linted. Obsidian is backported. Schist is not experimental. Mica is tested. Schist is not linted. Mica has a feature toggle.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is documented provided that it is not compiled. Section 2: a build is not localized provided that it is notarized. Section 3: a build is signed provided that it is not localized as well as has a feature toggle as well as is compiled. Section 4: a build is not signed provided that it is not localized as well as has no feature toggle as well as is tagged. Section 5: a build is compiled provided that it is flaky as well as has a changelog. Section 6: a build has a security advisory provided that it is linted as well as is not backported. Section 7: a build is notarized provided that it is not experimental. Section 8: a build is versioned provided that it has a migration script as well as is tested. Question: Schist is signed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028786", "pair_id": "u028786-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028786-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "2896c132e87cabdb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u028786-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is not tagged. Obsidian has a migration script. Mica is not backported. Obsidian is tested. Schist has no migration script. Schist has a feature toggle. Obsidian has no changelog. Schist has a changelog. Schist is flaky. Schist is not tagged. Mica is not linted. Obsidian is backported. Schist is not experimental. Mica is tested. Schist is not linted. Mica has a feature toggle.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is documented provided that it is not compiled. Section 2: a build is not localized provided that it is notarized. Section 3: a build is signed provided that it is not localized as well as has a feature toggle as well as is compiled. Section 4: a build is not signed provided that it is not localized as well as has no feature toggle as well as is tagged. Section 5: a build is compiled provided that it is flaky as well as has a changelog. Section 6: a build has a security advisory provided that it is linted as well as is not backported. Section 7: a build is notarized provided that it is experimental. Section 8: a build is versioned provided that it has a migration script as well as is tested. Question: Schist is signed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028786", "pair_id": "u028786-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028786-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "89f5841989115959", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u028817-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar is stateless. Quasar is isolated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is stateless, it thereby is not encrypted. Point B. If said workload is not stateless, it thereby is encrypted. Question: Statement: Quasar is encrypted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028817", "pair_id": "u028817-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028817-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "1b7e291816130c33", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028817-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar is stateless. Quasar is isolated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is stateless, it thereby is not encrypted. Point B. If said workload is not stateless, it thereby is encrypted. Point C. If said workload is isolated, it thereby has no GPU. Question: Statement: Quasar is encrypted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028817", "pair_id": "u028817-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028817-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "b49a02877bd9d8d8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028824-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is not collaborative. Betelgeuse is collaborative. Nashira is not embargoed. Betelgeuse is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse is translational. Betelgeuse is not a pilot study. Fomalhaut is not embargoed. Fomalhaut is translational. Betelgeuse has no steering committee. Fomalhaut is interdisciplinary. Betelgeuse is not preregistered. Betelgeuse is interdisciplinary. Nashira is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is peer reviewed and is embargoed and is translational, then it has a postdoc. (2) If a proposal is theoretical, then it has no postdoc. (3) If a proposal is collaborative and is peer reviewed and is translational, then it is endorsed. (4) If a proposal is not interdisciplinary, then it is not multicenter. (5) If a proposal is a pilot study and is embargoed, then it is multicenter. (6) If a proposal is embargoed, then it has industry backing. (7) If a proposal is collaborative and is interdisciplinary, then it is not endorsed. (5) is void if the proposal is peer reviewed. (3) is void if the proposal has a steering committee and is preregistered. When (3) and (7) clash, (3) prevails. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Betelgeuse is endorsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028824", "pair_id": "u028824-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028824-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2446ee35832e221c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028824-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nashira is not collaborative. Betelgeuse is collaborative. Nashira is not embargoed. Betelgeuse is not peer reviewed. Betelgeuse is translational. Betelgeuse is not a pilot study. Fomalhaut is not embargoed. Fomalhaut is translational. Betelgeuse has no steering committee. Fomalhaut is interdisciplinary. Betelgeuse is not preregistered. Betelgeuse is interdisciplinary. Nashira is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is peer reviewed and is embargoed and is translational, then it has a postdoc. (2) If a proposal is theoretical, then it has no postdoc. (3) If a proposal is collaborative and is peer reviewed and is translational, then it is endorsed. (4) If a proposal is interdisciplinary, then it is not multicenter. (5) If a proposal is a pilot study and is embargoed, then it is multicenter. (6) If a proposal is embargoed, then it has industry backing. (7) If a proposal is collaborative and is interdisciplinary, then it is not endorsed. (5) is void if the proposal is peer reviewed. (3) is void if the proposal has a steering committee and is preregistered. When (3) and (7) clash, (3) prevails. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Betelgeuse is endorsed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028824", "pair_id": "u028824-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028824-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e54564343d1b1a7b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028836-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Juno is backed up. Juno has a memory allotment of 61. Juno has a CPU quota of 25. Tundra is not virtualized. Borealis is not backed up. Juno has a replica count of 87. Borealis has a replica count of 15. Juno is virtualized. Borealis is isolated. Juno is not isolated.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload has a replica count above 55 and is not backed up and is not isolated, then it has a failover node. (2) If a workload is not encrypted, then it has no dedicated host. (3) If a workload has a replica count above 55 and has a memory allotment of at least 88 and has a CPU quota of at most 59, then it is autoscaled. (4) If a workload is not autoscaled and is backed up and is not isolated, then it is mirrored. (5) If a workload is not virtualized and is not backed up, then it is not cached. (6) If a workload has a replica count above 55 and is backed up and has a memory allotment above 38, then it is encrypted. Question: Which option holds for Juno?", "options": ["is encrypted", "is autoscaled", "has a failover node"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is encrypted", "unit_id": "u028836", "pair_id": "u028836-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028836-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "c2b4b20635444dd9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a10", "a6"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u028836-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Juno is not backed up. Juno has a memory allotment of 61. Juno has a CPU quota of 25. Tundra is not virtualized. Borealis is not backed up. Juno has a replica count of 87. Borealis has a replica count of 15. Juno is virtualized. Borealis is isolated. Juno is not isolated.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload has a replica count above 55 and is not backed up and is not isolated, then it has a failover node. (2) If a workload is not encrypted, then it has no dedicated host. (3) If a workload has a replica count above 55 and has a memory allotment of at least 88 and has a CPU quota of at most 59, then it is autoscaled. (4) If a workload is not autoscaled and is backed up and is not isolated, then it is mirrored. (5) If a workload is not virtualized and is not backed up, then it is not cached. (6) If a workload has a replica count above 55 and is backed up and has a memory allotment above 38, then it is encrypted. Question: Which option holds for Juno?", "options": ["is encrypted", "is autoscaled", "has a failover node"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a failover node", "unit_id": "u028836", "pair_id": "u028836-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028836-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "6d378f733d76a9e2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a10", "a6"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u028838-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is fuzzed. Gneiss is not fuzzed. Zircon is not documented. Zircon has no changelog. Zircon is not tagged.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is experimental and also is fuzzed, it also is localized. Clause 2: once any build has a changelog, it also has no security advisory. Clause 3: once any build is tagged and also is documented, it also has a security advisory. Clause 4: once any build has no changelog, it also is experimental. Clause 5: once any build is experimental and also is not fuzzed, it also is not localized. Clause 3 overrides Clause 2. Clause 1 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Zircon is localized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028838", "pair_id": "u028838-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028838-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ea6a0160bb87c163", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028838-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is fuzzed. Gneiss is not fuzzed. Zircon is not documented. Zircon has no changelog. Zircon is not tagged.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is experimental and also is fuzzed, it also is localized. Clause 2: once any build has a changelog, it also has no security advisory. Clause 3: once any build is tagged and also is documented, it also has a security advisory. Clause 4: once any build has a changelog, it also is experimental. Clause 5: once any build is experimental and also is not fuzzed, it also is not localized. Clause 3 overrides Clause 2. Clause 1 overrides Clause 5. Question: Does it follow that Zircon is localized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028838", "pair_id": "u028838-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028838-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fa38369b3f47a8be", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028886-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra has no seed funding. Electra is not theoretical. Electra is not translational. Aldebaran is not theoretical. Electra is exploratory. Electra has a field site.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is multicenter, so it is longitudinal. No. 2 While the given proposal is shortlisted, so it is not endorsed. No. 3 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is endorsed. No. 4 While the given proposal is theoretical, so it is multicenter. No. 5 While the given proposal is budgeted, so it is a pilot study. No. 6 While the given proposal is renewed, so it is budgeted. No. 7 While the given proposal is theoretical, so it is not interdisciplinary. No. 8 While the given proposal has seed funding, so it is not a pilot study. No. 9 While the given proposal has industry backing, so it is cofunded. No. 10 While the given proposal has a field site, so it has no steering committee. No. 11 While the given proposal is translational, so it is collaborative. No. 12 While the given proposal is preregistered, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 13 While the given proposal has seed funding, so it is embargoed. No. 14 While the given proposal is shortlisted, so it has industry backing. No. 15 While the given proposal is collaborative, so it is peer reviewed. No. 16 While the given proposal is renewed, so it is not peer reviewed. No. 17 While the given proposal is exploratory, so it is preregistered. No. 7 wins over No. 12. No. 16 wins over No. 15. No. 2 wins over No. 3. No. 5 wins over No. 8. Question: Select what holds for Electra: which option?", "options": ["is cofunded", "is endorsed", "is a pilot study", "is peer reviewed", "is longitudinal", "is interdisciplinary"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is interdisciplinary", "unit_id": "u028886", "pair_id": "u028886-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028886-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "19b23d66673d982a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a10", "a8", "a17", "a12", "a5"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u028886-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra has no seed funding. Electra is not theoretical. Electra is not translational. Aldebaran is not theoretical. Electra is exploratory. Electra has no field site.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is multicenter, so it is longitudinal. No. 2 While the given proposal is shortlisted, so it is not endorsed. No. 3 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is endorsed. No. 4 While the given proposal is theoretical, so it is multicenter. No. 5 While the given proposal is budgeted, so it is a pilot study. No. 6 While the given proposal is renewed, so it is budgeted. No. 7 While the given proposal is theoretical, so it is not interdisciplinary. No. 8 While the given proposal has seed funding, so it is not a pilot study. No. 9 While the given proposal has industry backing, so it is cofunded. No. 10 While the given proposal has a field site, so it has no steering committee. No. 11 While the given proposal is translational, so it is collaborative. No. 12 While the given proposal is preregistered, so it is interdisciplinary. No. 13 While the given proposal has seed funding, so it is embargoed. No. 14 While the given proposal is shortlisted, so it has industry backing. No. 15 While the given proposal is collaborative, so it is peer reviewed. No. 16 While the given proposal is renewed, so it is not peer reviewed. No. 17 While the given proposal is exploratory, so it is preregistered. No. 7 wins over No. 12. No. 16 wins over No. 15. No. 2 wins over No. 3. No. 5 wins over No. 8. Question: Select what holds for Electra: which option?", "options": ["is cofunded", "is endorsed", "is a pilot study", "is peer reviewed", "is longitudinal", "is interdisciplinary"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is interdisciplinary", "unit_id": "u028886", "pair_id": "u028886-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028886-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "f4c56ef5594b9522", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a10", "a8", "a17", "a12", "a5"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u028901-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk is not garnished. Anouk has a mortgage. Anouk is overdrawn. Anouk is indebted. Anouk is pensioned. Anouk is creditworthy.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has no mortgage, thus it is vetted. Provision 2: when the borrower here is bankrupt, thus it has a cosigner. Provision 3: when the borrower here is not garnished, thus it is refinanced. Provision 4: when the borrower here is solvent, thus it is amortized. Provision 5: when the borrower here is not creditworthy, thus it is bankrupt. Provision 6: when the borrower here is garnished, thus it is a depositor. Provision 7: when the borrower here is vetted, thus it is a homeowner. Provision 8: when the borrower here is not indebted, thus it is solvent. Provision 9: when the borrower here is a depositor, thus it is prequalified. Provision 10: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it has a lien. Provision 11: when the borrower here is pensioned, thus it has a guarantor. Provision 12: when the borrower here is not overdrawn, thus it has no cosigner. Provision 2 has no effect when the borrower here is creditworthy. Provision 2 has no effect when the borrower here has no mortgage. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 12. Question: Which one describes Anouk?", "options": ["has a lien", "is a homeowner", "is amortized", "is prequalified", "has a cosigner"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a lien", "unit_id": "u028901", "pair_id": "u028901-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028901-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f2a54e0e79f4f573", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a14", "a3", "a7"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028901-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk is garnished. Anouk has a mortgage. Anouk is overdrawn. Anouk is indebted. Anouk is pensioned. Anouk is creditworthy.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has no mortgage, thus it is vetted. Provision 2: when the borrower here is bankrupt, thus it has a cosigner. Provision 3: when the borrower here is not garnished, thus it is refinanced. Provision 4: when the borrower here is solvent, thus it is amortized. Provision 5: when the borrower here is not creditworthy, thus it is bankrupt. Provision 6: when the borrower here is garnished, thus it is a depositor. Provision 7: when the borrower here is vetted, thus it is a homeowner. Provision 8: when the borrower here is not indebted, thus it is solvent. Provision 9: when the borrower here is a depositor, thus it is prequalified. Provision 10: when the borrower here is refinanced, thus it has a lien. Provision 11: when the borrower here is pensioned, thus it has a guarantor. Provision 12: when the borrower here is not overdrawn, thus it has no cosigner. Provision 2 has no effect when the borrower here is creditworthy. Provision 2 has no effect when the borrower here has no mortgage. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 12. Question: Which one describes Anouk?", "options": ["has a lien", "is a homeowner", "is amortized", "is prequalified", "has a cosigner"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is prequalified", "unit_id": "u028901", "pair_id": "u028901-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028901-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "791c416730a6a3c1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a8", "a14", "a3", "a7"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028944-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is not sponsored. Sigrid is licensed. Sigrid is not seasoned. Rune is seasoned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is seasoned, so it is bonded. No. 2 While the given candidate is not probationary, so it has a portfolio. No. 3 While the given candidate has no diploma, so it is not certified. No. 4 While the given candidate is bonded, so it has a signing bonus. No. 5 While the given candidate is bonded, so it has no diploma. No. 6 While the given candidate is not licensed, so it is headhunted. No. 7 While the given candidate has no background screening, so it has no signing bonus. No. 8 While the given candidate is not seasoned, so it is not bonded. No. 9 While the given candidate is probationary, so it is unionized. No. 10 While the given candidate is unionized, so it has a diploma. No. 11 While the given candidate has no diploma, so it is certified. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is not sponsored. No. 11 stops applying as long as the given candidate is not probationary. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given candidate is probationary. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is probationary. No. 7 wins over No. 4. No. 3 wins over No. 11. No. 1 wins over No. 8. No. 5 wins over No. 10. Question: Is the claim \"Rune is not certified\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028944", "pair_id": "u028944-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028944-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "64bc029f0b682be5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028944-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Noor is not sponsored. Sigrid is licensed. Sigrid is not seasoned. Rune is seasoned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is seasoned, so it is bonded. No. 2 While the given candidate is not probationary, so it has a portfolio. No. 3 While the given candidate has no diploma, so it is not certified. No. 4 While the given candidate is not bonded, so it has a signing bonus. No. 5 While the given candidate is bonded, so it has no diploma. No. 6 While the given candidate is not licensed, so it is headhunted. No. 7 While the given candidate has no background screening, so it has no signing bonus. No. 8 While the given candidate is not seasoned, so it is not bonded. No. 9 While the given candidate is probationary, so it is unionized. No. 10 While the given candidate is unionized, so it has a diploma. No. 11 While the given candidate has no diploma, so it is certified. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is not sponsored. No. 11 stops applying as long as the given candidate is not probationary. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given candidate is probationary. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate is probationary. No. 7 wins over No. 4. No. 3 wins over No. 11. No. 1 wins over No. 8. No. 5 wins over No. 10. Question: Is the claim \"Rune is not certified\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u028944", "pair_id": "u028944-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028944-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f69a81be5aab9411", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u028954-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is palletized. Quentin is stamped. Jory is misrouted. Jory has a courier. Quentin is prepaid. Priya is refrigerated. Jory is not refrigerated. Priya is tracked. Jory is damaged. Jory is not prepaid. Jory is not tracked. Jory is stamped. Quentin has a courier.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is not fragile and likewise is not prepaid, so it is perishable. No. 2 While the given parcel is not fragile and likewise is not refrigerated and likewise is prepaid, so it has a waybill. No. 3 While the given parcel is not fragile and likewise is tracked, so it is oversized. No. 4 While the given parcel is not fragile and likewise is refrigerated, so it is hazardous. No. 5 While the given parcel has no courier, so it is not sealed. No. 6 While the given parcel is weighed, so it is not fragile. No. 7 While the given parcel is not fragile and likewise is not misrouted, so it is sealed. No. 8 While the given parcel is not palletized and likewise is stamped, so it is rerouted. No. 9 While the given parcel is stamped and likewise is damaged, so it is weighed. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given parcel is not misrouted. No. 5 wins over No. 7. Question: Select what holds for Jory: which option?", "options": ["is oversized", "is sealed", "is perishable", "is hazardous", "has a waybill"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is perishable", "unit_id": "u028954", "pair_id": "u028954-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028954-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7b248dea8c9efbf6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a11", "a5", "a7", "a13"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u028954-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jory is palletized. Quentin is stamped. Jory is misrouted. Jory has a courier. Quentin is prepaid. Priya is refrigerated. Jory is not refrigerated. Priya is tracked. Jory is damaged. Jory is prepaid. Jory is not tracked. Jory is stamped. Quentin has a courier.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is not fragile and likewise is not prepaid, so it is perishable. No. 2 While the given parcel is not fragile and likewise is not refrigerated and likewise is prepaid, so it has a waybill. No. 3 While the given parcel is not fragile and likewise is tracked, so it is oversized. No. 4 While the given parcel is not fragile and likewise is refrigerated, so it is hazardous. No. 5 While the given parcel has no courier, so it is not sealed. No. 6 While the given parcel is weighed, so it is not fragile. No. 7 While the given parcel is not fragile and likewise is not misrouted, so it is sealed. No. 8 While the given parcel is not palletized and likewise is stamped, so it is rerouted. No. 9 While the given parcel is stamped and likewise is damaged, so it is weighed. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given parcel is not misrouted. No. 5 wins over No. 7. Question: Select what holds for Jory: which option?", "options": ["is oversized", "is sealed", "is perishable", "is hazardous", "has a waybill"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a waybill", "unit_id": "u028954", "pair_id": "u028954-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028954-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "41dea25e8ecc483a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a11", "a5", "a7", "a13"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u028960-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not minified. Pumice is linted. Schist is not reproducible. Pumice is experimental. Mica is notarized. Schist is benchmarked. Mica is not linted. Schist is obsolete. Schist is not experimental. Mica is benchmarked. Pumice is benchmarked. Schist is notarized. Pumice is not obsolete. Mica is not minified. Pumice has a security advisory. Pumice is minified. Pumice is notarized. Schist has no security advisory.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is not notarized, and is not minified, that build is not flaky. Item B. When the build is benchmarked, and has no security advisory, and is experimental, that build is not tested. Item C. When the build is benchmarked, and has no security advisory, and is experimental, that build is tested. Item D. When the build is notarized, and is reproducible, that build has a feature toggle. Item E. When the build is obsolete, that build has no feature toggle. Item B is suspended when the build is not linted, and is benchmarked. Item E outranks Item D. Item B outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Pumice is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028960", "pair_id": "u028960-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028960-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "617139a3697fec8d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028960-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Schist is not minified. Pumice is linted. Schist is not reproducible. Pumice is experimental. Mica is notarized. Schist is benchmarked. Mica is not linted. Schist is obsolete. Schist is not experimental. Mica is benchmarked. Pumice is benchmarked. Schist is notarized. Pumice is not obsolete. Mica is not minified. Pumice has a security advisory. Pumice is minified. Pumice is notarized. Schist has no security advisory.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is not notarized, and is not minified, that build is not flaky. Item B. When the build is benchmarked, and has a security advisory, and is experimental, that build is not tested. Item C. When the build is benchmarked, and has no security advisory, and is experimental, that build is tested. Item D. When the build is notarized, and is reproducible, that build has a feature toggle. Item E. When the build is obsolete, that build has no feature toggle. Item B is suspended when the build is not linted, and is benchmarked. Item E outranks Item D. Item B outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Pumice is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u028960", "pair_id": "u028960-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028960-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fbe3d1cdba28d3aa", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u028966-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Thilo has a postal zone of 73. Nandor is not prepaid. Saskia is not oversized. Ulla is palletized. Saskia is not undeliverable. Saskia has a postal zone of 67. Ulla is not prepaid. Saskia is prepaid. Saskia has a weight class of 77.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is undeliverable: then it has a waybill. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is weighed plus is consolidated plus is labeled: then it has a locker slot. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is not hazardous. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is weighed plus is palletized plus is consolidated: then it is damaged. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is weighed plus has a weight class smaller than 78: then it is misrouted. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is weighed plus is oversized plus is stamped: then it is sealed. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel has a postal zone higher than 66: then it is not sealed. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is palletized: then it has no locker slot. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is weighed plus has a weight class no lower than 78: then it is scanned. Policy X. Suppose that parcel is weighed plus is perishable: then it is hazardous. Policy XI. Suppose that parcel is prepaid: then it is weighed. Policy X is waived if that parcel has a weight class higher than 10. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy VII. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy X. Question: Which choice is right for Saskia?", "options": ["is sealed", "is hazardous", "is damaged", "is misrouted", "has a locker slot", "is scanned"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is misrouted", "unit_id": "u028966", "pair_id": "u028966-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028966-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0a2d6205257a65dc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a0", "a13", "a4", "a17", "a15"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u028966-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Thilo has a postal zone of 73. Nandor is not prepaid. Saskia is not oversized. Ulla is palletized. Saskia is not undeliverable. Saskia has a postal zone of 19. Ulla is not prepaid. Saskia is prepaid. Saskia has a weight class of 77.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is undeliverable: then it has a waybill. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is weighed plus is consolidated plus is labeled: then it has a locker slot. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is not hazardous. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is weighed plus is palletized plus is consolidated: then it is damaged. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is weighed plus has a weight class smaller than 78: then it is misrouted. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is weighed plus is oversized plus is stamped: then it is sealed. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel has a postal zone higher than 66: then it is not sealed. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is palletized: then it has no locker slot. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is weighed plus has a weight class no lower than 78: then it is scanned. Policy X. Suppose that parcel is weighed plus is perishable: then it is hazardous. Policy XI. Suppose that parcel is prepaid: then it is weighed. Policy X is waived if that parcel has a weight class higher than 10. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy VII. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy X. Question: Which choice is right for Saskia?", "options": ["is sealed", "is hazardous", "is damaged", "is misrouted", "has a locker slot", "is scanned"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is misrouted", "unit_id": "u028966", "pair_id": "u028966-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028966-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f1359a5d1e856fff", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a0", "a13", "a4", "a17", "a15"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u028966-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Thilo has a postal zone of 73. Nandor is not prepaid. Saskia is not oversized. Ulla is palletized. Saskia is not undeliverable. Saskia has a postal zone of 67. Ulla is not prepaid. Saskia is prepaid. Saskia has a weight class of 77.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is undeliverable, it then has a waybill. #2 Each time a parcel is weighed and additionally is consolidated and additionally is labeled, it then has a locker slot. #3 Each time a parcel is oversized, it then is not hazardous. #4 Each time a parcel is weighed and additionally is palletized and additionally is consolidated, it then is damaged. #5 Each time a parcel is weighed and additionally has a weight class less than 78, it then is misrouted. #6 Each time a parcel is weighed and additionally is oversized and additionally is stamped, it then is sealed. #7 Each time a parcel has a postal zone greater than 66, it then is not sealed. #8 Each time a parcel is palletized, it then has no locker slot. #9 Each time a parcel is weighed and additionally has a weight class of 78 or above, it then is scanned. #10 Each time a parcel is weighed and additionally is perishable, it then is hazardous. #11 Each time a parcel is prepaid, it then is weighed. #10 is set aside if a parcel has a weight class greater than 10. #7 yields to #6. #2 yields to #8. #10 yields to #3. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Saskia?", "options": ["is sealed", "is hazardous", "is damaged", "is misrouted", "has a locker slot", "is scanned"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is misrouted", "unit_id": "u028966", "pair_id": "u028966-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028966-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0a2d6205257a65dc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a0", "a13", "a4", "a17", "a15"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u028966-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Thilo has a postal zone of 73. Nandor is not prepaid. Saskia is not oversized. Ulla is palletized. Saskia is not undeliverable. Saskia has a postal zone of 19. Ulla is not prepaid. Saskia is prepaid. Saskia has a weight class of 77.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is undeliverable, it then has a waybill. #2 Each time a parcel is weighed and additionally is consolidated and additionally is labeled, it then has a locker slot. #3 Each time a parcel is oversized, it then is not hazardous. #4 Each time a parcel is weighed and additionally is palletized and additionally is consolidated, it then is damaged. #5 Each time a parcel is weighed and additionally has a weight class less than 78, it then is misrouted. #6 Each time a parcel is weighed and additionally is oversized and additionally is stamped, it then is sealed. #7 Each time a parcel has a postal zone greater than 66, it then is not sealed. #8 Each time a parcel is palletized, it then has no locker slot. #9 Each time a parcel is weighed and additionally has a weight class of 78 or above, it then is scanned. #10 Each time a parcel is weighed and additionally is perishable, it then is hazardous. #11 Each time a parcel is prepaid, it then is weighed. #10 is set aside if a parcel has a weight class greater than 10. #7 yields to #6. #2 yields to #8. #10 yields to #3. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Saskia?", "options": ["is sealed", "is hazardous", "is damaged", "is misrouted", "has a locker slot", "is scanned"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is misrouted", "unit_id": "u028966", "pair_id": "u028966-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u028966-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f1359a5d1e856fff", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a0", "a13", "a4", "a17", "a15"]}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u028983-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not preregistered. Electra is multicenter. Electra is collaborative. Electra has no seed funding. Electra is not theoretical. Electra has no patent filing. Electra is preregistered. Kochab is collaborative. Electra is not resubmitted. Electra is not peer reviewed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is budgeted and additionally is endorsed, it then is not exploratory. #2 Each time a proposal has no seed funding, it then has no postdoc. #3 Each time a proposal is collaborative and additionally is theoretical, it then is a pilot study. #4 Each time a proposal is shortlisted and additionally is multicenter and additionally is resubmitted, it then is budgeted. #5 Each time a proposal is exploratory and additionally is collaborative, it then is translational. #6 Each time a proposal is exploratory and additionally has a field site and additionally is preregistered, it then is not translational. #7 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then has a postdoc. #8 Each time a proposal is endorsed, it then is not a pilot study. #9 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then is exploratory. #4 is set aside if a proposal has a patent filing. #2 is set aside if a proposal is peer reviewed. #4 is set aside if a proposal is collaborative. #5 yields to #6. #7 yields to #2. #3 yields to #8. #9 yields to #1. Question: Do the terms above show that Electra is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028983", "pair_id": "u028983-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028983-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e0df5f0786abb5ad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 22}}
{"id": "syn-u028983-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab is not preregistered. Electra is multicenter. Electra is collaborative. Electra has no seed funding. Electra is not theoretical. Electra has no patent filing. Electra is preregistered. Kochab is collaborative. Electra is not resubmitted. Electra is not peer reviewed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is budgeted and additionally is endorsed, it then is not exploratory. #2 Each time a proposal has seed funding, it then has no postdoc. #3 Each time a proposal is collaborative and additionally is theoretical, it then is a pilot study. #4 Each time a proposal is shortlisted and additionally is multicenter and additionally is resubmitted, it then is budgeted. #5 Each time a proposal is exploratory and additionally is collaborative, it then is translational. #6 Each time a proposal is exploratory and additionally has a field site and additionally is preregistered, it then is not translational. #7 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then has a postdoc. #8 Each time a proposal is endorsed, it then is not a pilot study. #9 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then is exploratory. #4 is set aside if a proposal has a patent filing. #2 is set aside if a proposal is peer reviewed. #4 is set aside if a proposal is collaborative. #5 yields to #6. #7 yields to #2. #3 yields to #8. #9 yields to #1. Question: Do the terms above show that Electra is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u028983", "pair_id": "u028983-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u028983-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "83f2affbc4f4d2f5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 22}}
{"id": "syn-u029002-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra is not budgeted. Electra is not a pilot study. Electra has a field site. Electra is renewed. Electra is not interdisciplinary. Electra is not resubmitted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has no postdoc and additionally is not renewed and additionally has a field site, it then is multicenter. #2 Each time a proposal is not a pilot study and additionally is not resubmitted and additionally is not interdisciplinary, it then has no postdoc. #3 Each time a proposal has no postdoc and additionally has a patent filing, it then is longitudinal. #4 Each time a proposal has no postdoc and additionally is renewed, it then has industry backing. #5 Each time a proposal has no postdoc and additionally has no patent filing and additionally is renewed, it then is preregistered. #6 Each time a proposal is not budgeted, it then has seed funding. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Electra?", "options": ["has industry backing", "is longitudinal", "is preregistered", "is multicenter"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has industry backing", "unit_id": "u029002", "pair_id": "u029002-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029002-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "e7a27edeea4d0504", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a9", "a6", "a1"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u029002-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Electra is not budgeted. Electra is not a pilot study. Electra has a field site. Electra is not renewed. Electra is not interdisciplinary. Electra is not resubmitted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has no postdoc and additionally is not renewed and additionally has a field site, it then is multicenter. #2 Each time a proposal is not a pilot study and additionally is not resubmitted and additionally is not interdisciplinary, it then has no postdoc. #3 Each time a proposal has no postdoc and additionally has a patent filing, it then is longitudinal. #4 Each time a proposal has no postdoc and additionally is renewed, it then has industry backing. #5 Each time a proposal has no postdoc and additionally has no patent filing and additionally is renewed, it then is preregistered. #6 Each time a proposal is not budgeted, it then has seed funding. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Electra?", "options": ["has industry backing", "is longitudinal", "is preregistered", "is multicenter"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is multicenter", "unit_id": "u029002", "pair_id": "u029002-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029002-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "356ee89c56031079", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a9", "a6", "a1"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u029059-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif has a pulse rate of 81. Yusuf is not ambulatory. Wendel has a mobility rank of 28. Elif is not fasting. Wendel is ambulatory. Wendel has a pain level of 52. Wendel is not fasting. Yusuf has a pain level of 32. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 63.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a mobility rank of 44 or less, it also is hypertensive. Clause 2: once any patient has a pulse rate under 75, it also is not symptomatic. Clause 3: once any patient has a pain level over 87, it also is symptomatic. Clause 4: once any patient is fasting, it also is not vaccinated. Clause 5: once any patient is ambulatory, it also is not hypertensive. Clause 6: once any patient has a mobility rank of 64 or more, it also is not waitlisted. Clause 7: once any patient has a pain level of 40 or more, it also is waitlisted. Clause 5 overrides Clause 1. Clause 6 overrides Clause 7. Clause 3 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Yusuf is not hypertensive?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029059", "pair_id": "u029059-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029059-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6ba251c635bc601e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u029059-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Elif has a pulse rate of 81. Yusuf is not ambulatory. Wendel has a mobility rank of 28. Elif is not fasting. Wendel is ambulatory. Wendel has a pain level of 52. Wendel is not fasting. Yusuf has a pain level of 32. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 63.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a mobility rank of 44 or less, it also is hypertensive. Clause 2: once any patient has a pulse rate under 75, it also is not symptomatic. Clause 3: once any patient has a pain level over 87, it also is symptomatic. Clause 4: once any patient is fasting, it also is not vaccinated. Clause 5: once any patient is ambulatory, it also is not hypertensive. Clause 6: once any patient has a mobility rank of 10 or more, it also is not waitlisted. Clause 7: once any patient has a pain level of 40 or more, it also is waitlisted. Clause 5 overrides Clause 1. Clause 6 overrides Clause 7. Clause 3 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Yusuf is not hypertensive?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029059", "pair_id": "u029059-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029059-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0f5eca1e2714fa87", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u029079-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is contagious. Gunnar is asthmatic. Gunnar is allergic. Gunnar is referred. Gunnar is bedridden.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is allergic and further has an interpreter and further has a chaperone, it thereby is diabetic. Point B. If said patient is bedridden and further is referred, it thereby is triaged. Question: Statement: Gunnar is diabetic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029079", "pair_id": "u029079-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029079-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "3b4db30360c14f97", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029079-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar is contagious. Gunnar is asthmatic. Gunnar is allergic. Gunnar is referred. Gunnar is bedridden.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is allergic and further has an interpreter and further has a chaperone, it thereby is diabetic. Point B. If said patient is allergic and further is asthmatic and further is contagious, it thereby is not diabetic. Point C. If said patient is bedridden and further is referred, it thereby is triaged. Question: Statement: Gunnar is diabetic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029079", "pair_id": "u029079-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029079-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "4c8a26d45d6d164b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029109-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra has no dedicated host. Cobalt is not stateless. Cobalt is idle. Cobalt is sandboxed. Juno is not stateless. Sierra is not idle. Zephyr is not idle. Cobalt is monitored. Juno is not cached. Juno has a dedicated host. Zephyr has a snapshot. Cobalt has a dedicated host. Sierra is cached. Sierra is stateless. Sierra is not isolated. Sierra is not monitored. Sierra is not encrypted. Zephyr is isolated. Juno is sandboxed. Sierra has no snapshot.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is containerized provided that it is cached as well as is sandboxed. Section 2: a workload is replicated provided that it is cached. Section 3: a workload has a GPU provided that it is cached. Section 4: a workload has no failover node provided that it is provisioned as well as is stateless as well as has a GPU. Section 5: a workload is not mirrored provided that it is sandboxed. Section 6: a workload is not provisioned provided that it is containerized. Section 7: a workload is provisioned provided that it is replicated as well as is not monitored. Section 8: a workload is throttled provided that it has a snapshot as well as is isolated as well as is idle. Section 9: a workload is mirrored provided that it has a snapshot. Section 10: a workload has no firewall provided that it has a dedicated host as well as is monitored. Section 11: a workload has a firewall provided that it has a snapshot. Section 12: a workload has a failover node provided that it is provisioned as well as is encrypted as well as is throttled. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 11. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 12. Question: Sierra has a failover node. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029109", "pair_id": "u029109-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029109-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e530288916a75742", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a16", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u029109-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra has no dedicated host. Cobalt is not stateless. Cobalt is idle. Cobalt is sandboxed. Juno is not stateless. Sierra is not idle. Zephyr is not idle. Cobalt is monitored. Juno is not cached. Juno has a dedicated host. Zephyr has a snapshot. Cobalt has a dedicated host. Sierra is cached. Sierra is stateless. Sierra is not isolated. Sierra is not monitored. Sierra is not encrypted. Zephyr is isolated. Juno is sandboxed. Sierra has no snapshot.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is containerized provided that it is cached as well as is sandboxed. Section 2: a workload is replicated provided that it is cached. Section 3: a workload has a GPU provided that it is cached. Section 4: a workload has no failover node provided that it is provisioned as well as is stateless as well as has a GPU. Section 5: a workload is not mirrored provided that it is sandboxed. Section 6: a workload is not provisioned provided that it is containerized. Section 7: a workload is provisioned provided that it is replicated as well as is monitored. Section 8: a workload is throttled provided that it has a snapshot as well as is isolated as well as is idle. Section 9: a workload is mirrored provided that it has a snapshot. Section 10: a workload has no firewall provided that it has a dedicated host as well as is monitored. Section 11: a workload has a firewall provided that it has a snapshot. Section 12: a workload has a failover node provided that it is provisioned as well as is encrypted as well as is throttled. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 9. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 11. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 12. Question: Sierra has a failover node. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029109", "pair_id": "u029109-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029109-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2bb35e8d28acade4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a16", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u029109-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra has no dedicated host. Cobalt is not stateless. Cobalt is idle. Cobalt is sandboxed. Juno is not stateless. Sierra is not idle. Zephyr is not idle. Cobalt is monitored. Juno is not cached. Juno has a dedicated host. Zephyr has a snapshot. Cobalt has a dedicated host. Sierra is cached. Sierra is stateless. Sierra is not isolated. Sierra is not monitored. Sierra is not encrypted. Zephyr is isolated. Juno is sandboxed. Sierra has no snapshot.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is cached plus is sandboxed: then it is containerized. Policy II. Suppose that workload is cached: then it is replicated. Policy III. Suppose that workload is cached: then it has a GPU. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is provisioned plus is stateless plus has a GPU: then it has no failover node. Policy V. Suppose that workload is sandboxed: then it is not mirrored. Policy VI. Suppose that workload is containerized: then it is not provisioned. Policy VII. Suppose that workload is replicated plus is not monitored: then it is provisioned. Policy VIII. Suppose that workload has a snapshot plus is isolated plus is idle: then it is throttled. Policy IX. Suppose that workload has a snapshot: then it is mirrored. Policy X. Suppose that workload has a dedicated host plus is monitored: then it has no firewall. Policy XI. Suppose that workload has a snapshot: then it has a firewall. Policy XII. Suppose that workload is provisioned plus is encrypted plus is throttled: then it has a failover node. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy XI. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy XII. Question: Is it so that Sierra has a failover node?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029109", "pair_id": "u029109-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029109-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e530288916a75742", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a16", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u029109-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra has no dedicated host. Cobalt is not stateless. Cobalt is idle. Cobalt is sandboxed. Juno is not stateless. Sierra is not idle. Zephyr is not idle. Cobalt is monitored. Juno is not cached. Juno has a dedicated host. Zephyr has a snapshot. Cobalt has a dedicated host. Sierra is cached. Sierra is stateless. Sierra is not isolated. Sierra is not monitored. Sierra is not encrypted. Zephyr is isolated. Juno is sandboxed. Sierra has no snapshot.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is cached plus is sandboxed: then it is containerized. Policy II. Suppose that workload is cached: then it is replicated. Policy III. Suppose that workload is cached: then it has a GPU. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is provisioned plus is stateless plus has a GPU: then it has no failover node. Policy V. Suppose that workload is sandboxed: then it is not mirrored. Policy VI. Suppose that workload is containerized: then it is not provisioned. Policy VII. Suppose that workload is replicated plus is monitored: then it is provisioned. Policy VIII. Suppose that workload has a snapshot plus is isolated plus is idle: then it is throttled. Policy IX. Suppose that workload has a snapshot: then it is mirrored. Policy X. Suppose that workload has a dedicated host plus is monitored: then it has no firewall. Policy XI. Suppose that workload has a snapshot: then it has a firewall. Policy XII. Suppose that workload is provisioned plus is encrypted plus is throttled: then it has a failover node. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy XI. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy XII. Question: Is it so that Sierra has a failover node?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029109", "pair_id": "u029109-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029109-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2bb35e8d28acade4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a16", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u029144-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is waitlisted. Benedek is symptomatic. Benedek has no caregiver. Benedek is not contagious. Benedek is allergic. Benedek is diabetic. Florin is diabetic. Florin has no caregiver. Benedek is not pregnant.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is waitlisted and likewise is not pregnant, so it is not postoperative. No. 2 While the given patient is allergic, so it is discharged. No. 3 While the given patient is fasting and likewise is symptomatic, so it has a pacemaker. No. 4 While the given patient is fasting and likewise is not symptomatic, so it has no pacemaker. No. 5 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is postoperative. No. 6 While the given patient is discharged and likewise is not contagious and likewise has a caregiver, so it is not fasting. No. 7 While the given patient is hypertensive, so it is fasting. No. 3 wins over No. 4. No. 7 wins over No. 6. No. 5 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Benedek has a pacemaker\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029144", "pair_id": "u029144-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029144-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "42032bdc715f92cb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u029144-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is waitlisted. Benedek is symptomatic. Benedek has no caregiver. Benedek is not contagious. Benedek is allergic. Benedek is diabetic. Florin is diabetic. Florin has no caregiver. Benedek is not pregnant.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is waitlisted and likewise is not pregnant, so it is not postoperative. No. 2 While the given patient is allergic, so it is discharged. No. 3 While the given patient is fasting and likewise is symptomatic, so it has a pacemaker. No. 4 While the given patient is diabetic and likewise is allergic, so it is hypertensive. No. 5 While the given patient is fasting and likewise is not symptomatic, so it has no pacemaker. No. 6 While the given patient is symptomatic, so it is postoperative. No. 7 While the given patient is discharged and likewise is not contagious and likewise has a caregiver, so it is not fasting. No. 8 While the given patient is hypertensive, so it is fasting. No. 3 wins over No. 5. No. 8 wins over No. 7. No. 6 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Benedek has a pacemaker\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029144", "pair_id": "u029144-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029144-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "aff67f26e5fc8b23", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u029169-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is licensed. Olek has a seniority step of 33. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 69. Olek has a commute radius of 66.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is licensed, and has a commute radius of less than 62, that candidate is not relocating. Item B. When the candidate is freelance, and has a seniority step of no more than 72, that candidate is recommended. Item C. When the candidate has a commute radius of less than 83, that candidate is not sponsored. Item D. When the candidate has a commute radius of less than 14, that candidate is not recommended. Item E. When the candidate is licensed, and has a commute radius of no less than 62, and has a seniority step of no more than 32, that candidate is relocating. Item F. When the candidate is freelance, and has an aptitude quotient of no more than 65, that candidate is sponsored. Item E is suspended when the candidate is eligible, and has a seniority step of more than 47. Item A outranks Item E. Item D outranks Item B. Item C outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Olek is relocating?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029169", "pair_id": "u029169-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029169-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6ca27201bec97341", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029169-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is licensed. Olek has a seniority step of 33. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 69. Olek has a commute radius of 66.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is licensed, and has a commute radius of less than 62, that candidate is not relocating. Item B. When the candidate is freelance, and has a seniority step of no more than 72, that candidate is recommended. Item C. When the candidate has a commute radius of less than 83, that candidate is not sponsored. Item D. When the candidate has a commute radius of less than 14, that candidate is not recommended. Item E. When the candidate is licensed, and has a commute radius of no less than 62, and has a seniority step of no more than 79, that candidate is relocating. Item F. When the candidate is freelance, and has an aptitude quotient of no more than 65, that candidate is sponsored. Item E is suspended when the candidate is eligible, and has a seniority step of more than 47. Item A outranks Item E. Item D outranks Item B. Item C outranks Item F. Question: Can one infer that Olek is relocating?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029169", "pair_id": "u029169-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029169-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f4c59074137c76c1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029205-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has a parcel volume of 39. Mirela is fragile. Mirela is palletized. Mirela is refrigerated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel has a parcel volume of minimum 24, it thereby is not rerouted. Point B. If said parcel is not rerouted, it thereby has a courier. Point C. If said parcel is not rerouted, it thereby has no courier. Point D. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby is not stamped. Point B is cancelled if said parcel is not fragile. Point D is cancelled if said parcel is fragile. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is fragile. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is not palletized. Question: Statement: Mirela has a courier. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029205", "pair_id": "u029205-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029205-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1dc2a512176079fa", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u029205-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirela has a parcel volume of 39. Mirela is not fragile. Mirela is palletized. Mirela is refrigerated.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel has a parcel volume of minimum 24, it thereby is not rerouted. Point B. If said parcel is not rerouted, it thereby has a courier. Point C. If said parcel is not rerouted, it thereby has no courier. Point D. If said parcel is refrigerated, it thereby is not stamped. Point B is cancelled if said parcel is not fragile. Point D is cancelled if said parcel is fragile. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is fragile. Point C is cancelled if said parcel is not palletized. Question: Statement: Mirela has a courier. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029205", "pair_id": "u029205-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029205-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f87cc6312b775d09", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u029252-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is not mirrored. Nimbus is not autoscaled. Borealis is autoscaled. Nimbus is encrypted. Nimbus is not mirrored. Borealis has a latency budget of 74. Nimbus has a latency budget of 73. Nimbus has a memory allotment of 80. Nimbus has a CPU quota of 41. Juno has a memory allotment of 43. Juno has a CPU quota of 88. Juno is not mirrored.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload has a latency budget of no more than 52, that workload has no firewall. Item B. When the workload has a memory allotment of no more than 72, that workload has a failover node. Item C. When the workload has a firewall, that workload is cached. Item D. When the workload has no firewall, that workload is not cached. Item E. When the workload has a latency budget of more than 21, that workload has no failover node. Item F. When the workload is encrypted, that workload has a firewall. Item G. When the workload is not autoscaled, that workload is backed up. Item G is suspended when the workload is encrypted. Item D is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of no less than 17. Item C is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of less than 17. Item B is suspended when the workload is mirrored. Item F is suspended when the workload has a CPU quota of more than 53. Item B outranks Item E. Item F outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Nimbus is cached?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029252", "pair_id": "u029252-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029252-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e731b12d8e43ac7f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u029252-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is not mirrored. Nimbus is not autoscaled. Borealis is autoscaled. Nimbus is encrypted. Nimbus is not mirrored. Borealis has a latency budget of 74. Nimbus has a latency budget of 73. Nimbus has a memory allotment of 80. Nimbus has a CPU quota of 41. Juno has a memory allotment of 43. Juno has a CPU quota of 88. Juno is not mirrored.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload has a latency budget of no more than 52, that workload has no firewall. Item B. When the workload has a memory allotment of no more than 72, that workload has a failover node. Item C. When the workload has no firewall, that workload is cached. Item D. When the workload has no firewall, that workload is not cached. Item E. When the workload has a latency budget of more than 21, that workload has no failover node. Item F. When the workload is encrypted, that workload has a firewall. Item G. When the workload is not autoscaled, that workload is backed up. Item G is suspended when the workload is encrypted. Item D is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of no less than 17. Item C is suspended when the workload has a latency budget of less than 17. Item B is suspended when the workload is mirrored. Item F is suspended when the workload has a CPU quota of more than 53. Item B outranks Item E. Item F outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item D. Question: Can one infer that Nimbus is cached?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029252", "pair_id": "u029252-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029252-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "048b5c6174f382ca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u029258-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar has seed funding. Hadar has a review mark of 13. Hadar is not translational.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a review mark of at least 68, then it is not multicenter. (2) If a proposal is translational, then it has a steering committee. (3) If a proposal has seed funding, then it is renewed. Question: Is it true that Hadar is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029258", "pair_id": "u029258-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029258-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "305e922a95855520", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u029258-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar has seed funding. Hadar has a review mark of 13. Hadar is translational.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a review mark of at least 68, then it is not multicenter. (2) If a proposal is translational, then it has a steering committee. (3) If a proposal has seed funding, then it is renewed. Question: Is it true that Hadar is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029258", "pair_id": "u029258-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029258-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "e34a3218a797bc90", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u029258-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar has seed funding. Hadar has a review mark of 13. Hadar is not translational.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has a review mark of 68 or more, it also is not multicenter. Clause 2: once any proposal is translational, it also has a steering committee. Clause 3: once any proposal has seed funding, it also is renewed. Question: Does it follow that Hadar is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029258", "pair_id": "u029258-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029258-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "305e922a95855520", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u029258-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar has seed funding. Hadar has a review mark of 13. Hadar is translational.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has a review mark of 68 or more, it also is not multicenter. Clause 2: once any proposal is translational, it also has a steering committee. Clause 3: once any proposal has seed funding, it also is renewed. Question: Does it follow that Hadar is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029258", "pair_id": "u029258-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029258-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "e34a3218a797bc90", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u029264-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hamid is bankrupt. Hamid has a guarantor. Tomas has a guarantor. Hamid has a cosigner. Tomas is not amortized. Hamid is not audited. Hamid has no collateral.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is audited: then it is creditworthy. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has a guarantor: then it is not underwritten. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is amortized: then it is not creditworthy. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a cosigner: then it is underwritten. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is amortized: then it is not a homeowner. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower has a cosigner: then it is foreclosed. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is amortized: then it has an escrow account. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it is not underwritten. Policy IX. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt: then it is a homeowner. Policy X. Suppose that borrower has a guarantor: then it is garnished. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. Question: Which choice is right for Hamid?", "options": ["has an escrow account", "is garnished", "is creditworthy", "is underwritten"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is garnished", "unit_id": "u029264", "pair_id": "u029264-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029264-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "7473049fd22798b0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a9", "a5", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029264-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hamid is bankrupt. Hamid has no guarantor. Tomas has a guarantor. Hamid has a cosigner. Tomas is not amortized. Hamid is not audited. Hamid has no collateral.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is audited: then it is creditworthy. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has a guarantor: then it is not underwritten. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is amortized: then it is not creditworthy. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a cosigner: then it is underwritten. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is amortized: then it is not a homeowner. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower has a cosigner: then it is foreclosed. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is amortized: then it has an escrow account. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower has collateral: then it is not underwritten. Policy IX. Suppose that borrower is bankrupt: then it is a homeowner. Policy X. Suppose that borrower has a guarantor: then it is garnished. In a clash, Policy VIII beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. Question: Which choice is right for Hamid?", "options": ["has an escrow account", "is garnished", "is creditworthy", "is underwritten"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is underwritten", "unit_id": "u029264", "pair_id": "u029264-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029264-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "dd3a0ba52e0c1daf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a9", "a5", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029274-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is benchmarked. Mica is not benchmarked. Shale is obsolete. Mica has a defect tally of 50.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a defect tally of less than 54, that build has a changelog. Item B. When the build is reproducible, that build is notarized. Item C. When the build has a defect tally of more than 49, that build is reproducible. Item D. When the build has a defect tally of no more than 49, that build has a migration script. Item E. When the build is obsolete, that build is tagged. Item F. When the build is benchmarked, that build is localized. Item G. When the build is notarized, that build has a security advisory. Item H. When the build has a migration script, that build is minified. Item I. When the build is minified, that build is signed. Question: What applies to Mica?", "options": ["has a security advisory", "is signed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a security advisory", "unit_id": "u029274", "pair_id": "u029274-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029274-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "63791aa6fc3d8992", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a3"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u029274-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is benchmarked. Mica is not benchmarked. Shale is obsolete. Mica has a defect tally of 85.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a defect tally of less than 54, that build has a changelog. Item B. When the build is reproducible, that build is notarized. Item C. When the build has a defect tally of more than 49, that build is reproducible. Item D. When the build has a defect tally of no more than 49, that build has a migration script. Item E. When the build is obsolete, that build is tagged. Item F. When the build is benchmarked, that build is localized. Item G. When the build is notarized, that build has a security advisory. Item H. When the build has a migration script, that build is minified. Item I. When the build is minified, that build is signed. Question: What applies to Mica?", "options": ["has a security advisory", "is signed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a security advisory", "unit_id": "u029274", "pair_id": "u029274-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029274-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "474b7966f9074d29", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a3"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u029284-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk is amortized. Anouk is pensioned. Anouk is employed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is employed, it then is solvent. #2 Each time a borrower has a guarantor, it then is refinanced. #3 Each time a borrower is refinanced, it then is indebted. #4 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is creditworthy. #5 Each time a borrower is creditworthy, it then is not indebted. #6 Each time a borrower is amortized, it then is not solvent. #7 Each time a borrower is not pensioned, it then is not creditworthy. #6 yields to #1. #4 yields to #7. #5 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Anouk is not indebted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029284", "pair_id": "u029284-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029284-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7c876f40ae6c9711", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029284-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Anouk is amortized. Anouk is pensioned. Anouk is employed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is employed, it then is solvent. #2 Each time a borrower has a guarantor, it then is refinanced. #3 Each time a borrower is refinanced, it then is indebted. #4 Each time a borrower is overdrawn, it then is creditworthy. #5 Each time a borrower is creditworthy, it then is not indebted. #6 Each time a borrower is amortized, it then is not solvent. #7 Each time a borrower is pensioned, it then is not creditworthy. #6 yields to #1. #4 yields to #7. #5 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Anouk is not indebted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029284", "pair_id": "u029284-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029284-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "c5821ea52970ccae", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029308-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is translational. Nashira is not translational. Izar has a review mark of 76. Izar is resubmitted. Nashira is not theoretical. Nashira is resubmitted. Izar is translational. Izar is interdisciplinary. Nashira has a review mark of 18.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here has a review mark beneath 71, thus it has ethics clearance. Provision 2: when the proposal here is resubmitted, thus it has a postdoc. Provision 3: when the proposal here is interdisciplinary, thus it is not preregistered. Question: Would it be right to say that Nashira is not preregistered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029308", "pair_id": "u029308-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029308-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "b54466668533a488", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029308-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is translational. Nashira is not translational. Izar has a review mark of 76. Izar is resubmitted. Nashira is not theoretical. Nashira is resubmitted. Izar is translational. Izar is interdisciplinary. Nashira has a review mark of 18.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is not translational, thus it is preregistered. Provision 2: when the proposal here has a review mark beneath 71, thus it has ethics clearance. Provision 3: when the proposal here is resubmitted, thus it has a postdoc. Provision 4: when the proposal here is interdisciplinary, thus it is not preregistered. Question: Would it be right to say that Nashira is not preregistered?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029308", "pair_id": "u029308-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029308-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "60613f67bc1116f3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029308-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is translational. Nashira is not translational. Izar has a review mark of 76. Izar is resubmitted. Nashira is not theoretical. Nashira is resubmitted. Izar is translational. Izar is interdisciplinary. Nashira has a review mark of 18.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has a review mark short of 71, it thereby has ethics clearance. Point B. If said proposal is resubmitted, it thereby has a postdoc. Point C. If said proposal is interdisciplinary, it thereby is not preregistered. Question: Statement: Nashira is not preregistered. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029308", "pair_id": "u029308-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029308-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "b54466668533a488", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029308-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is translational. Nashira is not translational. Izar has a review mark of 76. Izar is resubmitted. Nashira is not theoretical. Nashira is resubmitted. Izar is translational. Izar is interdisciplinary. Nashira has a review mark of 18.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal is not translational, it thereby is preregistered. Point B. If said proposal has a review mark short of 71, it thereby has ethics clearance. Point C. If said proposal is resubmitted, it thereby has a postdoc. Point D. If said proposal is interdisciplinary, it thereby is not preregistered. Question: Statement: Nashira is not preregistered. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029308", "pair_id": "u029308-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029308-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "60613f67bc1116f3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029308-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is translational. Nashira is not translational. Izar has a review mark of 76. Izar is resubmitted. Nashira is not theoretical. Nashira is resubmitted. Izar is translational. Izar is interdisciplinary. Nashira has a review mark of 18.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a review mark that falls below 71, so it has ethics clearance. No. 2 While the given proposal is resubmitted, so it has a postdoc. No. 3 While the given proposal is interdisciplinary, so it is not preregistered. Question: Is the claim \"Nashira is not preregistered\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029308", "pair_id": "u029308-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029308-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "b54466668533a488", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029308-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is translational. Nashira is not translational. Izar has a review mark of 76. Izar is resubmitted. Nashira is not theoretical. Nashira is resubmitted. Izar is translational. Izar is interdisciplinary. Nashira has a review mark of 18.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is not translational, so it is preregistered. No. 2 While the given proposal has a review mark that falls below 71, so it has ethics clearance. No. 3 While the given proposal is resubmitted, so it has a postdoc. No. 4 While the given proposal is interdisciplinary, so it is not preregistered. Question: Is the claim \"Nashira is not preregistered\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029308", "pair_id": "u029308-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029308-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "60613f67bc1116f3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029317-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dagny is vetted. Greta has a repayment grade of 62. Dagny is refinanced. Dagny has a repayment grade of 85. Greta has a risk tier of 63.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is a depositor provided that it has a risk tier of 78 or lower. Section 2: a borrower is prequalified provided that it is vetted. Section 3: a borrower is creditworthy provided that it is garnished. Section 4: a borrower is audited provided that it has a risk tier of 37 or lower. Section 5: a borrower is garnished provided that it has a risk tier exceeding 78. Section 6: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it has a repayment grade exceeding 63. Section 7: a borrower is amortized provided that it is a depositor. Section 8: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it has a repayment grade of 63 or lower. Section 9: a borrower has a mortgage provided that it is a homeowner. Section 10: a borrower is solvent provided that it has an escrow account. Section 7 lapses for a borrower if it is refinanced. Question: Which statement fits Dagny?", "options": ["is amortized", "is solvent", "has a mortgage", "is creditworthy"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a mortgage", "unit_id": "u029317", "pair_id": "u029317-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029317-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9483d2d427b9cbd8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a12", "a4", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u029317-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dagny is vetted. Greta has a repayment grade of 73. Dagny is refinanced. Dagny has a repayment grade of 85. Greta has a risk tier of 63.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is a depositor provided that it has a risk tier of 78 or lower. Section 2: a borrower is prequalified provided that it is vetted. Section 3: a borrower is creditworthy provided that it is garnished. Section 4: a borrower is audited provided that it has a risk tier of 37 or lower. Section 5: a borrower is garnished provided that it has a risk tier exceeding 78. Section 6: a borrower is a homeowner provided that it has a repayment grade exceeding 63. Section 7: a borrower is amortized provided that it is a depositor. Section 8: a borrower has an escrow account provided that it has a repayment grade of 63 or lower. Section 9: a borrower has a mortgage provided that it is a homeowner. Section 10: a borrower is solvent provided that it has an escrow account. Section 7 lapses for a borrower if it is refinanced. Question: Which statement fits Dagny?", "options": ["is amortized", "is solvent", "has a mortgage", "is creditworthy"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a mortgage", "unit_id": "u029317", "pair_id": "u029317-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029317-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1af4ae2858f48dcd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a12", "a4", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u029382-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is not peer reviewed. Hadar is not cofunded. Izar is cofunded. Hadar is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is cofunded, thus it has seed funding. Question: Would it be right to say that Izar is peer reviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029382", "pair_id": "u029382-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029382-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "3631dad00f898caa", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029382-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is not peer reviewed. Hadar is not cofunded. Izar is not cofunded. Hadar is peer reviewed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is cofunded, thus it has seed funding. Question: Would it be right to say that Izar is peer reviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029382", "pair_id": "u029382-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029382-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "fa455eb3c87f688a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029453-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo has a claim frequency of 37. Viggo has flood coverage. Agata has a claim frequency of 92. Agata has no flood coverage. Viggo is bundled. Una has no roadside assistance. Una has a claim frequency of 69. Yara is not bundled. Una is bundled. Yara has no roadside assistance. Agata is bundled. Agata has no roadside assistance. Yara has a claim frequency of 37. Una has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is not lapsed provided that it is bundled. Section 2: a policyholder is inspected provided that it is not disputed. Section 3: a policyholder is lapsed provided that it has flood coverage. Section 4: a policyholder is not grandfathered provided that it has no flood coverage. Section 5: a policyholder is grandfathered provided that it is lapsed. Section 6: a policyholder is reinstated provided that it has roadside assistance. Section 7: a policyholder has no deductible waiver provided that it has a beneficiary. Section 8: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it has a claim frequency of 35 or lower. Section 9: a policyholder has a beneficiary provided that it is lapsed. Section 10: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it has a beneficiary. Section 7 lapses for a policyholder if it has a claim frequency exceeding 33. Section 3 lapses for a policyholder if it is subrogated. Section 10 lapses for a policyholder if it has a claim frequency of 70 or lower. Section 5 lapses for a policyholder if it has flood coverage. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it has no flood coverage. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 10. Question: Viggo has a deductible waiver. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029453", "pair_id": "u029453-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029453-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "93a1ba05b53b2963", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029453-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo has a claim frequency of 37. Viggo has flood coverage. Agata has a claim frequency of 92. Agata has no flood coverage. Viggo is bundled. Una has no roadside assistance. Una has a claim frequency of 69. Yara is not bundled. Una is bundled. Yara has no roadside assistance. Agata is bundled. Agata has no roadside assistance. Yara has a claim frequency of 37. Una has no flood coverage.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder is not lapsed provided that it is bundled. Section 2: a policyholder is inspected provided that it is not disputed. Section 3: a policyholder is lapsed provided that it has flood coverage. Section 4: a policyholder is not grandfathered provided that it has no flood coverage. Section 5: a policyholder is grandfathered provided that it is lapsed. Section 6: a policyholder is reinstated provided that it has roadside assistance. Section 7: a policyholder has no deductible waiver provided that it has a beneficiary. Section 8: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it has a claim frequency of 35 or lower. Section 9: a policyholder has a beneficiary provided that it is lapsed. Section 10: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it has a beneficiary. Section 7 lapses for a policyholder if it has a claim frequency exceeding 33. Section 3 lapses for a policyholder if it is subrogated. Section 10 lapses for a policyholder if it has a claim frequency of 33 or lower. Section 5 lapses for a policyholder if it has flood coverage. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it has no flood coverage. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 10. Question: Viggo has a deductible waiver. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029453", "pair_id": "u029453-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029453-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8e8b468923269e84", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029498-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar is cached. Quasar is not backed up. Borealis is not backed up. Orrery is backed up. Juno is not backed up. Orrery is not cached. Juno is not cached.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is cached: then it has a dedicated host. Question: Is it so that Borealis is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029498", "pair_id": "u029498-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029498-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "bead144b0145ac2d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029498-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar is cached. Quasar is not backed up. Borealis is not backed up. Borealis is cached. Orrery is backed up. Juno is not backed up. Orrery is not cached. Juno is not cached.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is cached: then it has a dedicated host. Question: Is it so that Borealis is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029498", "pair_id": "u029498-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029498-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "c028c8db2692793c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029498-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar is cached. Quasar is not backed up. Borealis is not backed up. Orrery is backed up. Juno is not backed up. Orrery is not cached. Juno is not cached.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is cached, it then has a dedicated host. Question: Do the terms above show that Borealis is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029498", "pair_id": "u029498-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029498-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "bead144b0145ac2d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029498-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar is cached. Quasar is not backed up. Borealis is not backed up. Borealis is cached. Orrery is backed up. Juno is not backed up. Orrery is not cached. Juno is not cached.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is cached, it then has a dedicated host. Question: Do the terms above show that Borealis is backed up?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029498", "pair_id": "u029498-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029498-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "c028c8db2692793c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029527-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has an adjuster. Bruno is covered. Bruno has no deductible waiver.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is not a smoker. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has an adjuster, thus it is retired. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it is not litigated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it is a smoker. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is not appraised, thus it is disputed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it is not disputed. Provision 7: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is not retired. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it is appraised. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is covered, thus it is not appraised. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 9. Question: Would it be right to say that Bruno is disputed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029527", "pair_id": "u029527-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029527-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ed30f75e57d739e9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u029527-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has an adjuster. Bruno is covered. Bruno has no deductible waiver.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is not a smoker. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has an adjuster, thus it is retired. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it is not litigated. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it is a smoker. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is appraised, thus it is disputed. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it is not disputed. Provision 7: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is not retired. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it is appraised. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is covered, thus it is not appraised. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 7. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 9. Question: Would it be right to say that Bruno is disputed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029527", "pair_id": "u029527-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029527-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "3c27206d359ff85d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u029550-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has a debt ratio of 2. Ingrid is bankrupt. Corin is not bankrupt. Hamid is not bankrupt. Corin is a homeowner. Ingrid is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is employed, so it has no cosigner. No. 2 While the given borrower is not bankrupt, so it is foreclosed. No. 3 While the given borrower is a homeowner, so it is employed. No. 4 While the given borrower has a debt ratio that exceeds 69, so it is not employed. Question: Is the claim \"Ingrid is not employed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029550", "pair_id": "u029550-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029550-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "de09eba10c384488", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u029550-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Corin has a debt ratio of 2. Ingrid is bankrupt. Corin is not bankrupt. Hamid is not bankrupt. Corin is a homeowner. Ingrid is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower is employed, so it has no cosigner. No. 2 While the given borrower is bankrupt, so it is foreclosed. No. 3 While the given borrower is a homeowner, so it is employed. No. 4 While the given borrower has a debt ratio that exceeds 69, so it is not employed. Question: Is the claim \"Ingrid is not employed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029550", "pair_id": "u029550-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029550-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "6cc00a5513121067", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u029551-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is reimbursed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby is retired. Point B. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby is not covered. Point C. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby is not retired. Point C supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Fabian has a premium discount. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029551", "pair_id": "u029551-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029551-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "385e25ae289b2027", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029551-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is not reimbursed.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby is retired. Point B. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby is not covered. Point C. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby is not retired. Point C supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Fabian has a premium discount. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029551", "pair_id": "u029551-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029551-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "8769d151d9df10b4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029584-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra has a milestone total of 73. Fomalhaut is not a pilot study. Electra has industry backing. Electra is embargoed. Electra is endorsed. Fomalhaut is cofunded. Electra has a team size of 96. Electra has a citation index of 17. Fomalhaut has a milestone total of 41. Electra is a pilot study.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has a milestone total of 61 or less and also is endorsed, it also is exploratory. Clause 2: once any proposal has seed funding and also has a citation index under 20 and also has industry backing, it also is not collaborative. Clause 3: once any proposal is embargoed and also is endorsed, it also is budgeted. Clause 4: once any proposal is interdisciplinary and also has a team size of 36 or more and also has a milestone total of 75 or less, it also has seed funding. Clause 5: once any proposal is a pilot study, it also is interdisciplinary. Clause 6: once any proposal is a pilot study and also has industry backing and also is cofunded, it also is not interdisciplinary. Clause 7: once any proposal has seed funding and also has a citation index of 16 or more and also is endorsed, it also is collaborative. Clause 4 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a team size under 17. Clause 3 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is endorsed. Clause 6 overrides Clause 5. Clause 7 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Electra is collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029584", "pair_id": "u029584-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029584-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c7a9ec5eb6027171", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u029584-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra has a milestone total of 73. Fomalhaut is not a pilot study. Electra has industry backing. Electra is embargoed. Electra is endorsed. Fomalhaut is cofunded. Electra has a team size of 96. Electra has a citation index of 17. Fomalhaut has a milestone total of 41. Electra is a pilot study.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal has a milestone total of 61 or less and also is endorsed, it also is exploratory. Clause 2: once any proposal has seed funding and also has a citation index under 20 and also has industry backing, it also is not collaborative. Clause 3: once any proposal is embargoed and also is endorsed, it also is budgeted. Clause 4: once any proposal is interdisciplinary and also has a team size of 36 or more and also has a milestone total of 75 or less, it also has seed funding. Clause 5: once any proposal is a pilot study, it also is interdisciplinary. Clause 6: once any proposal is a pilot study and also has industry backing and also is cofunded, it also is not interdisciplinary. Clause 7: once any proposal has seed funding and also has a citation index of 20 or more and also is endorsed, it also is collaborative. Clause 4 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a team size under 17. Clause 3 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is endorsed. Clause 6 overrides Clause 5. Clause 7 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Electra is collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029584", "pair_id": "u029584-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029584-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e36885766b68d507", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u029597-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jasna is onboarded. Jasna is not eligible. Petra has a commute radius of 66. Jasna is not headhunted. Petra is not eligible. Lotte has no mentor. Petra has an aptitude quotient of 88. Jasna has a seniority step of 67. Lotte has a notice period of 45. Lotte has a commute radius of 36. Petra is headhunted. Petra has a notice period of 58. Petra has a mentor. Lotte is eligible. Petra is unionized. Jasna is unionized. Petra is onboarded. Lotte has a seniority step of 33. Petra has a seniority step of 31. Jasna has a commute radius of 10. Jasna has an aptitude quotient of 30.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate has a visa, and has an aptitude quotient of less than 78, that candidate is sponsored. Item B. When the candidate is headhunted, and has a notice period of no less than 18, that candidate is certified. Item C. When the candidate has a visa, and is relocating, that candidate is licensed. Item D. When the candidate is onboarded, and has a commute radius of no more than 65, that candidate is probationary. Item E. When the candidate has a visa, and has a background screening, that candidate is bonded. Item F. When the candidate is certified, and has a mentor, and has a notice period of less than 61, that candidate has a visa. Item G. When the candidate is unionized, that candidate is fingerprinted. Item H. When the candidate has a visa, and has a seniority step of no less than 68, and is eligible, that candidate is seasoned. Item I. When the candidate has a visa, and has an aptitude quotient of no less than 78, and is fingerprinted, that candidate is a veteran. Item D is suspended when the candidate has an aptitude quotient of less than 27. Item E is suspended when the candidate is relocating. Question: What applies to Petra?", "options": ["is licensed", "is seasoned", "is bonded", "is sponsored", "is a veteran"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a veteran", "unit_id": "u029597", "pair_id": "u029597-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029597-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1433e82ac86561f8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a18", "a17", "a4", "a5"]}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u029597-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Jasna is onboarded. Jasna is not eligible. Petra has a commute radius of 41. Jasna is not headhunted. Petra is not eligible. Lotte has no mentor. Petra has an aptitude quotient of 88. Jasna has a seniority step of 67. Lotte has a notice period of 45. Lotte has a commute radius of 36. Petra is headhunted. Petra has a notice period of 58. Petra has a mentor. Lotte is eligible. Petra is unionized. Jasna is unionized. Petra is onboarded. Lotte has a seniority step of 33. Petra has a seniority step of 31. Jasna has a commute radius of 10. Jasna has an aptitude quotient of 30.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate has a visa, and has an aptitude quotient of less than 78, that candidate is sponsored. Item B. When the candidate is headhunted, and has a notice period of no less than 18, that candidate is certified. Item C. When the candidate has a visa, and is relocating, that candidate is licensed. Item D. When the candidate is onboarded, and has a commute radius of no more than 65, that candidate is probationary. Item E. When the candidate has a visa, and has a background screening, that candidate is bonded. Item F. When the candidate is certified, and has a mentor, and has a notice period of less than 61, that candidate has a visa. Item G. When the candidate is unionized, that candidate is fingerprinted. Item H. When the candidate has a visa, and has a seniority step of no less than 68, and is eligible, that candidate is seasoned. Item I. When the candidate has a visa, and has an aptitude quotient of no less than 78, and is fingerprinted, that candidate is a veteran. Item D is suspended when the candidate has an aptitude quotient of less than 27. Item E is suspended when the candidate is relocating. Question: What applies to Petra?", "options": ["is licensed", "is seasoned", "is bonded", "is sponsored", "is a veteran"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a veteran", "unit_id": "u029597", "pair_id": "u029597-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029597-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "053f1168f57f3aca", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a6", "a18", "a17", "a4", "a5"]}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u029614-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren has a repayment grade of 12. Evren is not audited. Evren is delinquent. Evren is not overdrawn. Evren has a credit rating of 88. Evren is not employed. Evren has no guarantor.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is not bankrupt provided that it has a repayment grade of 11 or higher. Section 2: a borrower is a depositor provided that it is overdrawn. Section 3: a borrower has no cosigner provided that it has a guarantor as well as is delinquent as well as is employed. Section 4: a borrower is prequalified provided that it has no guarantor as well as has a credit rating exceeding 16. Section 5: a borrower is not prequalified provided that it has a guarantor as well as has a credit rating of 16 or lower. Section 5 lapses for a borrower if it has a repayment grade of 88 or higher as well as has a guarantor. Section 4 lapses for a borrower if it is audited. Section 2 lapses for a borrower if it has a guarantor. Question: Evren is prequalified. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029614", "pair_id": "u029614-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029614-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "087bb678451b7106", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u029614-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren has a repayment grade of 12. Evren is not audited. Evren is delinquent. Evren is not overdrawn. Evren has a credit rating of 88. Evren is not employed. Evren has no guarantor.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is not bankrupt provided that it has a repayment grade of 11 or higher. Section 2: a borrower is a depositor provided that it is overdrawn. Section 3: a borrower has no cosigner provided that it has a guarantor as well as is delinquent as well as is employed. Section 4: a borrower is prequalified provided that it has a guarantor as well as has a credit rating exceeding 16. Section 5: a borrower is not prequalified provided that it has a guarantor as well as has a credit rating of 16 or lower. Section 5 lapses for a borrower if it has a repayment grade of 88 or higher as well as has a guarantor. Section 4 lapses for a borrower if it is audited. Section 2 lapses for a borrower if it has a guarantor. Question: Evren is prequalified. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029614", "pair_id": "u029614-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029614-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "5625e885ef30ba75", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u029715-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is perishable. Priya is not tracked. Priya is labeled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not oversized: then it is not stamped. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is stamped. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is not oversized. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is labeled: then it is fragile. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is not registered: then it has a courier. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is perishable: then it is misrouted. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is perishable: then it is not prepaid. Question: Is it so that Priya is not stamped?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029715", "pair_id": "u029715-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029715-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "4aa8f5357219d315", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029715-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is perishable. Priya is not tracked. Priya is labeled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not oversized: then it is not stamped. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is stamped. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is not oversized. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is labeled: then it is fragile. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is not registered: then it has a courier. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is perishable: then it is misrouted. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is not perishable: then it is not prepaid. Question: Is it so that Priya is not stamped?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029715", "pair_id": "u029715-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029715-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "44d0a0cc318932bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029724-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf has no chaperone. Yusuf is ambulatory. Yusuf is hypertensive. Yusuf is contagious. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Yusuf is allergic. Yusuf is anemic.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has no caregiver, it also has no pacemaker. Clause 2: once any patient is ambulatory and also is not contagious, it also is not diabetic. Clause 3: once any patient is diabetic and also is symptomatic and also is allergic, it also is admitted. Clause 4: once any patient is diabetic and also is not hypertensive and also has no chaperone, it also is vaccinated. Clause 5: once any patient is contagious and also is ambulatory and also is anemic, it also is diabetic. Clause 6: once any patient is pregnant, it also is not discharged. Clause 7: once any patient is not pregnant, it also is not asthmatic. Clause 8: once any patient is rescheduled, it also is asthmatic. Clause 9: once any patient is diabetic and also is waitlisted, it also is discharged. Clause 10: once any patient is diabetic and also is pregnant, it also is bedridden. Clause 11: once any patient is diabetic and also is hypertensive and also is allergic, it also has an interpreter. Clause 12: once any patient is diabetic and also is not symptomatic, it also is triaged. Clause 6 overrides Clause 9. Clause 7 overrides Clause 8. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Question: Which of these is true of Yusuf?", "options": ["is bedridden", "is admitted", "is discharged", "has an interpreter", "is vaccinated", "is triaged"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has an interpreter", "unit_id": "u029724", "pair_id": "u029724-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029724-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "11be1d80d0dfde3d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a7", "a10", "a4", "a3", "a16"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u029724-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf has no chaperone. Yusuf is ambulatory. Yusuf is hypertensive. Yusuf is contagious. Yusuf is rescheduled. Yusuf is allergic. Yusuf is anemic.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has no caregiver, it also has no pacemaker. Clause 2: once any patient is ambulatory and also is not contagious, it also is not diabetic. Clause 3: once any patient is diabetic and also is symptomatic and also is allergic, it also is admitted. Clause 4: once any patient is diabetic and also is not hypertensive and also has no chaperone, it also is vaccinated. Clause 5: once any patient is contagious and also is ambulatory and also is anemic, it also is diabetic. Clause 6: once any patient is pregnant, it also is not discharged. Clause 7: once any patient is not pregnant, it also is not asthmatic. Clause 8: once any patient is rescheduled, it also is asthmatic. Clause 9: once any patient is diabetic and also is waitlisted, it also is discharged. Clause 10: once any patient is diabetic and also is pregnant, it also is bedridden. Clause 11: once any patient is diabetic and also is hypertensive and also is allergic, it also has an interpreter. Clause 12: once any patient is diabetic and also is not symptomatic, it also is triaged. Clause 6 overrides Clause 9. Clause 7 overrides Clause 8. Clause 2 overrides Clause 5. Question: Which of these is true of Yusuf?", "options": ["is bedridden", "is admitted", "is discharged", "has an interpreter", "is vaccinated", "is triaged"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has an interpreter", "unit_id": "u029724", "pair_id": "u029724-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029724-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d4cd789196c2ca42", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a7", "a10", "a4", "a3", "a16"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u029725-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has no courier. Mirela is consolidated. Rasmus is not delayed. Ulla is refrigerated. Rasmus is scanned. Rasmus is not refrigerated. Mirela is not delayed. Mirela is refrigerated. Mirela is perishable. Ulla is not consolidated. Ulla is not scanned.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is perishable, it then is fragile. #2 Each time a parcel is not delayed and additionally is consolidated, it then is not fragile. #2 is set aside if a parcel is not scanned and additionally is not refrigerated. #2 yields to #1. Question: Do the terms above show that Ulla has a courier?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029725", "pair_id": "u029725-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029725-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e946238e32caec7c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029725-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is delayed. Ulla has no courier. Mirela is consolidated. Rasmus is not delayed. Ulla is refrigerated. Rasmus is scanned. Rasmus is not refrigerated. Mirela is not delayed. Mirela is refrigerated. Mirela is perishable. Ulla is not consolidated. Ulla is not scanned.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is perishable, it then is fragile. #2 Each time a parcel is not delayed and additionally is consolidated, it then is not fragile. #2 is set aside if a parcel is not scanned and additionally is not refrigerated. #2 yields to #1. Question: Do the terms above show that Ulla has a courier?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029725", "pair_id": "u029725-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029725-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3139961f261c51d7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029751-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is theoretical. Betelgeuse is endorsed. Aldebaran is theoretical.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a team size below 88, then it is embargoed. (2) If a proposal has a team size of at least 88, then it has a steering committee. (3) If a proposal is renewed, then it has a postdoc. (4) If a proposal has a patent filing, then it is interdisciplinary. (5) If a proposal is theoretical, then it is multicenter. (6) If a proposal is not theoretical, then it is longitudinal. (7) If a proposal is endorsed, then it is not exploratory. (8) If a proposal is not renewed, then it is preregistered. (9) If a proposal has no patent filing, then it is cofunded. (8) is void if the proposal is not collaborative. Question: Which option holds for Betelgeuse?", "options": ["is longitudinal", "is multicenter", "is interdisciplinary", "has a postdoc", "is embargoed", "has a steering committee", "is preregistered", "is cofunded"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is multicenter", "unit_id": "u029751", "pair_id": "u029751-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029751-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e7237dcf85f76d5b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a10", "a12", "a8", "a6", "a2", "a7", "a3"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u029751-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Betelgeuse is not theoretical. Betelgeuse is endorsed. Aldebaran is theoretical.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a team size below 88, then it is embargoed. (2) If a proposal has a team size of at least 88, then it has a steering committee. (3) If a proposal is renewed, then it has a postdoc. (4) If a proposal has a patent filing, then it is interdisciplinary. (5) If a proposal is theoretical, then it is multicenter. (6) If a proposal is not theoretical, then it is longitudinal. (7) If a proposal is endorsed, then it is not exploratory. (8) If a proposal is not renewed, then it is preregistered. (9) If a proposal has no patent filing, then it is cofunded. (8) is void if the proposal is not collaborative. Question: Which option holds for Betelgeuse?", "options": ["is longitudinal", "is multicenter", "is interdisciplinary", "has a postdoc", "is embargoed", "has a steering committee", "is preregistered", "is cofunded"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is longitudinal", "unit_id": "u029751", "pair_id": "u029751-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029751-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "af40bf7449857cdf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a10", "a12", "a8", "a6", "a2", "a7", "a3"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u029770-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not tagged. Gneiss is signed. Shale is not profiled. Shale is notarized. Gneiss is not backported. Gneiss is not obsolete. Shale is obsolete. Shale is not backported. Shale is not signed. Gneiss is notarized.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is benchmarked provided that it is notarized as well as is minified as well as has a feature toggle. Section 2: a build is fuzzed provided that it is not tagged. Section 3: a build has a migration script provided that it is obsolete. Section 4: a build is not tested provided that it is signed as well as is backported as well as is obsolete. Section 5: a build is tested provided that it is signed as well as is backported. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is profiled as well as is minified. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Gneiss is tested. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029770", "pair_id": "u029770-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029770-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "08001f8aee0a1201", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u029770-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not tagged. Gneiss is signed. Shale is not profiled. Shale is notarized. Gneiss is not backported. Gneiss is not obsolete. Shale is obsolete. Shale is not backported. Shale is not signed. Gneiss is notarized.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is benchmarked provided that it is notarized as well as is minified as well as has a feature toggle. Section 2: a build is fuzzed provided that it is tagged. Section 3: a build has a migration script provided that it is obsolete. Section 4: a build is not tested provided that it is signed as well as is backported as well as is obsolete. Section 5: a build is tested provided that it is signed as well as is backported. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is profiled as well as is minified. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 5. Question: Gneiss is tested. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029770", "pair_id": "u029770-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029770-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "02fecb936638a88a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u029770-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not tagged. Gneiss is signed. Shale is not profiled. Shale is notarized. Gneiss is not backported. Gneiss is not obsolete. Shale is obsolete. Shale is not backported. Shale is not signed. Gneiss is notarized.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is notarized plus is minified plus has a feature toggle: then it is benchmarked. Policy II. Suppose that build is not tagged: then it is fuzzed. Policy III. Suppose that build is obsolete: then it has a migration script. Policy IV. Suppose that build is signed plus is backported plus is obsolete: then it is not tested. Policy V. Suppose that build is signed plus is backported: then it is tested. Policy IV is waived if that build is profiled plus is minified. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. Question: Is it so that Gneiss is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029770", "pair_id": "u029770-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029770-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "08001f8aee0a1201", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u029770-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not tagged. Gneiss is signed. Shale is not profiled. Shale is notarized. Gneiss is not backported. Gneiss is not obsolete. Shale is obsolete. Shale is not backported. Shale is not signed. Gneiss is notarized.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is notarized plus is minified plus has a feature toggle: then it is benchmarked. Policy II. Suppose that build is tagged: then it is fuzzed. Policy III. Suppose that build is obsolete: then it has a migration script. Policy IV. Suppose that build is signed plus is backported plus is obsolete: then it is not tested. Policy V. Suppose that build is signed plus is backported: then it is tested. Policy IV is waived if that build is profiled plus is minified. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy V. Question: Is it so that Gneiss is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029770", "pair_id": "u029770-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029770-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "02fecb936638a88a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u029770-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not tagged. Gneiss is signed. Shale is not profiled. Shale is notarized. Gneiss is not backported. Gneiss is not obsolete. Shale is obsolete. Shale is not backported. Shale is not signed. Gneiss is notarized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is notarized and additionally is minified and additionally has a feature toggle, it then is benchmarked. #2 Each time a build is not tagged, it then is fuzzed. #3 Each time a build is obsolete, it then has a migration script. #4 Each time a build is signed and additionally is backported and additionally is obsolete, it then is not tested. #5 Each time a build is signed and additionally is backported, it then is tested. #4 is set aside if a build is profiled and additionally is minified. #5 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Gneiss is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029770", "pair_id": "u029770-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029770-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "08001f8aee0a1201", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u029770-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not tagged. Gneiss is signed. Shale is not profiled. Shale is notarized. Gneiss is not backported. Gneiss is not obsolete. Shale is obsolete. Shale is not backported. Shale is not signed. Gneiss is notarized.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is notarized and additionally is minified and additionally has a feature toggle, it then is benchmarked. #2 Each time a build is tagged, it then is fuzzed. #3 Each time a build is obsolete, it then has a migration script. #4 Each time a build is signed and additionally is backported and additionally is obsolete, it then is not tested. #5 Each time a build is signed and additionally is backported, it then is tested. #4 is set aside if a build is profiled and additionally is minified. #5 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Gneiss is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029770", "pair_id": "u029770-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029770-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "02fecb936638a88a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 12}}
{"id": "syn-u029898-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is not pregnant. Aurel is not ambulatory. Vilja is not ambulatory. Vilja has no chaperone.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is discharged, then it is vaccinated. (2) If a patient is anemic, then it is asthmatic. (3) If a patient is not pregnant, then it is referred. (4) If a patient is ambulatory, then it is not hypertensive. (5) If a patient has a chaperone, then it is anemic. (6) If a patient is fasting, then it is postoperative. (7) If a patient is referred, then it is discharged. (8) If a patient is fasting, then it is triaged. (9) If a patient is asthmatic, then it is not vaccinated. Question: Is it true that Vilja is vaccinated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029898", "pair_id": "u029898-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029898-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "148ceeabd31d19f0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u029898-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is not pregnant. Aurel is not ambulatory. Vilja is not ambulatory. Vilja has no chaperone.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is discharged, then it is vaccinated. (2) If a patient is anemic, then it is asthmatic. (3) If a patient is pregnant, then it is referred. (4) If a patient is ambulatory, then it is not hypertensive. (5) If a patient has a chaperone, then it is anemic. (6) If a patient is fasting, then it is postoperative. (7) If a patient is referred, then it is discharged. (8) If a patient is fasting, then it is triaged. (9) If a patient is asthmatic, then it is not vaccinated. Question: Is it true that Vilja is vaccinated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029898", "pair_id": "u029898-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029898-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "2c4400fb44fb2963", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u029916-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is not patched. Zephyr has a GPU. Zephyr is not idle. Zephyr has a failover node. Zephyr is provisioned.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is provisioned, thus it is not cached. Provision 2: when the workload here has a failover node, thus it is backed up. Provision 3: when the workload here is provisioned, thus it has no firewall. Provision 4: when the workload here is provisioned, thus it is cached. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here is not idle. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here is idle. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here has no GPU. Provision 2 has no effect when the workload here is not patched. Question: Would it be right to say that Zephyr is not cached?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029916", "pair_id": "u029916-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029916-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4deda0f55218a965", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u029916-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr is not patched. Zephyr has a GPU. Zephyr is idle. Zephyr has a failover node. Zephyr is provisioned.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is provisioned, thus it is not cached. Provision 2: when the workload here has a failover node, thus it is backed up. Provision 3: when the workload here is provisioned, thus it has no firewall. Provision 4: when the workload here is provisioned, thus it is cached. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here is not idle. Provision 1 has no effect when the workload here is idle. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here has no GPU. Provision 2 has no effect when the workload here is not patched. Question: Would it be right to say that Zephyr is not cached?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029916", "pair_id": "u029916-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029916-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "36fcfd2febb92556", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u029918-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is seasoned. Hedda has no portfolio. Hedda is not unionized. Ivo is recommended. Hedda is not seasoned. Ivo is interviewed. Noor is not unionized. Hedda has no mentor. Ivo is probationary. Hedda is not a veteran. Ivo is freelance. Ivo has no mentor. Noor has a mentor. Noor is not interviewed. Ivo has a signing bonus. Hedda is not freelance. Ivo is not a veteran. Hedda is recommended.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is interviewed, so it is not relocating. No. 2 While the given candidate has a visa and likewise is probationary and likewise is recommended, so it is bonded. No. 3 While the given candidate is certified and likewise is recommended, so it is relocating. No. 4 While the given candidate is certified and likewise is seasoned, so it has a visa. No. 5 While the given candidate has a visa and likewise has no mentor and likewise is interviewed, so it is not bonded. No. 6 While the given candidate is recommended and likewise is freelance and likewise has a signing bonus, so it is certified. No. 7 While the given candidate is unionized, so it is sponsored. No. 8 While the given candidate is probationary, so it is not sponsored. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given candidate is a veteran. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a portfolio. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given candidate is recommended. No. 3 wins over No. 1. No. 7 wins over No. 8. No. 5 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Ivo is bonded\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029918", "pair_id": "u029918-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029918-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e0a268b1f0a562df", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u029918-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is seasoned. Hedda has no portfolio. Hedda is not unionized. Ivo is recommended. Hedda is not seasoned. Ivo is interviewed. Noor is not unionized. Hedda has no mentor. Ivo is probationary. Hedda is not a veteran. Ivo is freelance. Ivo has no mentor. Noor has a mentor. Noor is not interviewed. Ivo has a signing bonus. Hedda is not freelance. Ivo is not a veteran. Hedda is recommended.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given candidate is interviewed, so it is not relocating. No. 2 While the given candidate has a visa and likewise is probationary and likewise is recommended, so it is bonded. No. 3 While the given candidate is certified and likewise is recommended, so it is relocating. No. 4 While the given candidate is certified and likewise is seasoned, so it has a visa. No. 5 While the given candidate has a visa and likewise has a mentor and likewise is interviewed, so it is not bonded. No. 6 While the given candidate is recommended and likewise is freelance and likewise has a signing bonus, so it is certified. No. 7 While the given candidate is unionized, so it is sponsored. No. 8 While the given candidate is probationary, so it is not sponsored. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given candidate is a veteran. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given candidate has a portfolio. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given candidate is recommended. No. 3 wins over No. 1. No. 7 wins over No. 8. No. 5 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Ivo is bonded\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029918", "pair_id": "u029918-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029918-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "010263c0d349016d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u029981-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not reproducible. Pumice is not backported. Pumice is minified.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is merged, it thereby is versioned. Point B. If said build is fuzzed, it thereby is not versioned. Point C. If said build is reproducible, it thereby is benchmarked. Point D. If said build is backported, it thereby is merged. Point E. If said build is minified, it thereby is fuzzed. Question: Statement: Pumice is versioned. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029981", "pair_id": "u029981-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029981-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "a9ae8127217a27e9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029981-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is not reproducible. Pumice is not backported. Pumice is minified.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is merged, it thereby is versioned. Point B. If said build is fuzzed, it thereby is not versioned. Point C. If said build is reproducible, it thereby is benchmarked. Point D. If said build is backported, it thereby is merged. Point E. If said build is minified, it thereby is fuzzed. Point F. If said build is minified, it thereby has a migration script. Question: Statement: Pumice is versioned. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029981", "pair_id": "u029981-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u029981-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "c082b71bd4201324", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029985-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not triaged. Zora has a fever reading of 17. Zora is waitlisted. Benedek is not triaged. Dorian has a fever reading of 97. Zora is not contagious. Benedek is not contagious. Dorian is waitlisted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is waitlisted: then it is not pregnant. Policy II. Suppose that patient has a fever reading smaller than 98: then it is diabetic. Policy III. Suppose that patient is contagious: then it is sedated. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a fever reading smaller than 75: then it is not diabetic. Policy V. Suppose that patient has a fever reading no higher than 87: then it is ambulatory. Policy V is waived if that patient is triaged. Policy IV is waived if that patient is waitlisted. Policy I is waived if that patient has a fever reading no higher than 62. Policy IV is waived if that patient has a fever reading no lower than 30. Policy II is waived if that patient has a fever reading smaller than 30. Question: Is it so that Dorian is diabetic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029985", "pair_id": "u029985-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029985-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2956a4737c3a0545", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029985-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zora is not triaged. Zora has a fever reading of 17. Zora is waitlisted. Benedek is not triaged. Dorian has a fever reading of 97. Zora is not contagious. Benedek is not contagious. Dorian is waitlisted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is waitlisted: then it is not pregnant. Policy II. Suppose that patient has a fever reading smaller than 75: then it is diabetic. Policy III. Suppose that patient is contagious: then it is sedated. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a fever reading smaller than 75: then it is not diabetic. Policy V. Suppose that patient has a fever reading no higher than 87: then it is ambulatory. Policy V is waived if that patient is triaged. Policy IV is waived if that patient is waitlisted. Policy I is waived if that patient has a fever reading no higher than 62. Policy IV is waived if that patient has a fever reading no lower than 30. Policy II is waived if that patient has a fever reading smaller than 30. Question: Is it so that Dorian is diabetic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u029985", "pair_id": "u029985-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029985-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a284ccb0c8a9ab37", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u029999-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper has no public endpoint. Juno is backed up. Nimbus is backed up. Juno has a public endpoint. Nimbus has no failover node. Juno has a snapshot. Nimbus has no public endpoint. Juno is autoscaled. Juno has no failover node.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is encrypted and also has a snapshot, it also is not containerized. Clause 2: once any workload is encrypted and also has a snapshot and also is autoscaled, it also is containerized. Clause 3: once any workload is not monitored and also is backed up, it also is encrypted. Clause 4: once any workload has a public endpoint and also is autoscaled, it also is virtualized. Clause 5: once any workload has no failover node, it also is not monitored. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Juno is containerized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u029999", "pair_id": "u029999-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029999-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6df634a55c7f376c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 19}}
{"id": "syn-u029999-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vesper has no public endpoint. Juno is backed up. Nimbus is backed up. Juno has a public endpoint. Nimbus has no failover node. Juno has a snapshot. Nimbus has no public endpoint. Juno is autoscaled. Juno has no failover node.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is encrypted and also has no snapshot, it also is not containerized. Clause 2: once any workload is encrypted and also has a snapshot and also is autoscaled, it also is containerized. Clause 3: once any workload is not monitored and also is backed up, it also is encrypted. Clause 4: once any workload has a public endpoint and also is autoscaled, it also is virtualized. Clause 5: once any workload has no failover node, it also is not monitored. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Juno is containerized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u029999", "pair_id": "u029999-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u029999-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "07c382a134063e2f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 19}}
{"id": "syn-u030025-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is foreclosed. Greta is not pensioned. Greta is foreclosed. Ingrid has no cosigner. Greta has no cosigner. Greta is overdrawn. Ingrid is not pensioned. Greta is not bankrupt. Ingrid has a mortgage.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a mortgage and also is pensioned, it also has collateral. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is bankrupt and also has a cosigner. Question: Does it follow that Greta is foreclosed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030025", "pair_id": "u030025-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030025-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0a2903d9407187be", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030025-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is foreclosed. Greta is not pensioned. Greta is not foreclosed. Ingrid has no cosigner. Greta has no cosigner. Greta is overdrawn. Ingrid is not pensioned. Greta is not bankrupt. Ingrid has a mortgage.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a mortgage and also is pensioned, it also has collateral. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is bankrupt and also has a cosigner. Question: Does it follow that Greta is foreclosed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030025", "pair_id": "u030025-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030025-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a5dd9bfb885adf32", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030027-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is tested. Shale is benchmarked. Pumice is not tagged. Shale is backported. Pumice is not obsolete. Shale is tagged. Shale is obsolete. Shale is merged. Shale is documented. Shale has a feature toggle.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is tagged, thus it has a changelog. Provision 2: when the build here is linted while is documented while is versioned, thus it is reverted. Provision 3: when the build here is merged while has a feature toggle, thus it is reproducible. Provision 4: when the build here is experimental, thus it is minified. Provision 5: when the build here is reproducible while is tested, thus it is linted. Provision 6: when the build here is obsolete while is benchmarked, thus it is versioned. Provision 7: when the build here is linted while is backported while is obsolete, thus it is flaky. Provision 2 has no effect when the build here is backported. Provision 4 has no effect when the build here is documented. Question: Which one describes Shale?", "options": ["is flaky", "is reverted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is flaky", "unit_id": "u030027", "pair_id": "u030027-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030027-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cc8d7441ad60360b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a14", "a13"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u030027-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is tested. Shale is benchmarked. Pumice is not tagged. Shale is not backported. Pumice is not obsolete. Shale is tagged. Shale is obsolete. Shale is merged. Shale is documented. Shale has a feature toggle.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is tagged, thus it has a changelog. Provision 2: when the build here is linted while is documented while is versioned, thus it is reverted. Provision 3: when the build here is merged while has a feature toggle, thus it is reproducible. Provision 4: when the build here is experimental, thus it is minified. Provision 5: when the build here is reproducible while is tested, thus it is linted. Provision 6: when the build here is obsolete while is benchmarked, thus it is versioned. Provision 7: when the build here is linted while is backported while is obsolete, thus it is flaky. Provision 2 has no effect when the build here is backported. Provision 4 has no effect when the build here is documented. Question: Which one describes Shale?", "options": ["is flaky", "is reverted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reverted", "unit_id": "u030027", "pair_id": "u030027-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030027-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1c0deaec48f582ca", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a14", "a13"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u030027-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is tested. Shale is benchmarked. Pumice is not tagged. Shale is backported. Pumice is not obsolete. Shale is tagged. Shale is obsolete. Shale is merged. Shale is documented. Shale has a feature toggle.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is tagged, so it has a changelog. No. 2 While the given build is linted and likewise is documented and likewise is versioned, so it is reverted. No. 3 While the given build is merged and likewise has a feature toggle, so it is reproducible. No. 4 While the given build is experimental, so it is minified. No. 5 While the given build is reproducible and likewise is tested, so it is linted. No. 6 While the given build is obsolete and likewise is benchmarked, so it is versioned. No. 7 While the given build is linted and likewise is backported and likewise is obsolete, so it is flaky. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build is backported. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given build is documented. Question: Select what holds for Shale: which option?", "options": ["is flaky", "is reverted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is flaky", "unit_id": "u030027", "pair_id": "u030027-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030027-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cc8d7441ad60360b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a14", "a13"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u030027-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Shale is tested. Shale is benchmarked. Pumice is not tagged. Shale is not backported. Pumice is not obsolete. Shale is tagged. Shale is obsolete. Shale is merged. Shale is documented. Shale has a feature toggle.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is tagged, so it has a changelog. No. 2 While the given build is linted and likewise is documented and likewise is versioned, so it is reverted. No. 3 While the given build is merged and likewise has a feature toggle, so it is reproducible. No. 4 While the given build is experimental, so it is minified. No. 5 While the given build is reproducible and likewise is tested, so it is linted. No. 6 While the given build is obsolete and likewise is benchmarked, so it is versioned. No. 7 While the given build is linted and likewise is backported and likewise is obsolete, so it is flaky. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build is backported. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given build is documented. Question: Select what holds for Shale: which option?", "options": ["is flaky", "is reverted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reverted", "unit_id": "u030027", "pair_id": "u030027-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030027-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1c0deaec48f582ca", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a14", "a13"]}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u030028-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus is sandboxed. Nimbus has no firewall. Nimbus is throttled. Nimbus has a failover node. Nimbus is not patched. Nimbus has a dedicated host. Nimbus is not stateless.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is provisioned while is not patched, thus it is containerized. Provision 2: when the workload here has a dedicated host, thus it has no public endpoint. Provision 3: when the workload here is encrypted, thus it is provisioned. Provision 4: when the workload here is provisioned while has a failover node while is stateless, thus it is not containerized. Provision 5: when the workload here is provisioned while is sandboxed, thus it is deprecated. Provision 6: when the workload here has a failover node, thus it is encrypted. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here has a failover node while has a firewall. Question: Would it be right to say that Nimbus is not containerized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030028", "pair_id": "u030028-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030028-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d32a874606b1323e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030028-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus is sandboxed. Nimbus has no firewall. Nimbus is throttled. Nimbus has a failover node. Nimbus is not patched. Nimbus has a dedicated host. Nimbus is not stateless.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is provisioned while is patched, thus it is containerized. Provision 2: when the workload here has a dedicated host, thus it has no public endpoint. Provision 3: when the workload here is encrypted, thus it is provisioned. Provision 4: when the workload here is provisioned while has a failover node while is stateless, thus it is not containerized. Provision 5: when the workload here is provisioned while is sandboxed, thus it is deprecated. Provision 6: when the workload here has a failover node, thus it is encrypted. Provision 4 has no effect when the workload here has a failover node while has a firewall. Question: Would it be right to say that Nimbus is not containerized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030028", "pair_id": "u030028-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030028-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "63f2f7c5eca08f7f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030028-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus is sandboxed. Nimbus has no firewall. Nimbus is throttled. Nimbus has a failover node. Nimbus is not patched. Nimbus has a dedicated host. Nimbus is not stateless.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is provisioned and further is not patched, it thereby is containerized. Point B. If said workload has a dedicated host, it thereby has no public endpoint. Point C. If said workload is encrypted, it thereby is provisioned. Point D. If said workload is provisioned and further has a failover node and further is stateless, it thereby is not containerized. Point E. If said workload is provisioned and further is sandboxed, it thereby is deprecated. Point F. If said workload has a failover node, it thereby is encrypted. Point D is cancelled if said workload has a failover node and further has a firewall. Question: Statement: Nimbus is not containerized. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030028", "pair_id": "u030028-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030028-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d32a874606b1323e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030028-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus is sandboxed. Nimbus has no firewall. Nimbus is throttled. Nimbus has a failover node. Nimbus is not patched. Nimbus has a dedicated host. Nimbus is not stateless.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload is provisioned and further is patched, it thereby is containerized. Point B. If said workload has a dedicated host, it thereby has no public endpoint. Point C. If said workload is encrypted, it thereby is provisioned. Point D. If said workload is provisioned and further has a failover node and further is stateless, it thereby is not containerized. Point E. If said workload is provisioned and further is sandboxed, it thereby is deprecated. Point F. If said workload has a failover node, it thereby is encrypted. Point D is cancelled if said workload has a failover node and further has a firewall. Question: Statement: Nimbus is not containerized. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030028", "pair_id": "u030028-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030028-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "63f2f7c5eca08f7f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030028-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus is sandboxed. Nimbus has no firewall. Nimbus is throttled. Nimbus has a failover node. Nimbus is not patched. Nimbus has a dedicated host. Nimbus is not stateless.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is provisioned and likewise is not patched, so it is containerized. No. 2 While the given workload has a dedicated host, so it has no public endpoint. No. 3 While the given workload is encrypted, so it is provisioned. No. 4 While the given workload is provisioned and likewise has a failover node and likewise is stateless, so it is not containerized. No. 5 While the given workload is provisioned and likewise is sandboxed, so it is deprecated. No. 6 While the given workload has a failover node, so it is encrypted. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload has a failover node and likewise has a firewall. Question: Is the claim \"Nimbus is not containerized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030028", "pair_id": "u030028-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030028-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d32a874606b1323e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030028-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus is sandboxed. Nimbus has no firewall. Nimbus is throttled. Nimbus has a failover node. Nimbus is not patched. Nimbus has a dedicated host. Nimbus is not stateless.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is provisioned and likewise is patched, so it is containerized. No. 2 While the given workload has a dedicated host, so it has no public endpoint. No. 3 While the given workload is encrypted, so it is provisioned. No. 4 While the given workload is provisioned and likewise has a failover node and likewise is stateless, so it is not containerized. No. 5 While the given workload is provisioned and likewise is sandboxed, so it is deprecated. No. 6 While the given workload has a failover node, so it is encrypted. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload has a failover node and likewise has a firewall. Question: Is the claim \"Nimbus is not containerized\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030028", "pair_id": "u030028-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030028-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "63f2f7c5eca08f7f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030105-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is documented. Talc is documented. Talc has no security advisory. Gneiss is not documented. Gneiss is localized. Talc is not reverted. Pumice is signed. Galena is not reverted. Galena has a feature toggle. Pumice is localized. Talc is localized. Galena is not signed. Galena has a security advisory.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is signed, thus it is experimental. Provision 2: when the build here is documented while is reverted, thus it is not compiled. Provision 3: when the build here is documented while has no security advisory, thus it is compiled. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here is reverted. Provision 2 has no effect when the build here has a security advisory while is localized. Question: Would it be right to say that Galena is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030105", "pair_id": "u030105-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030105-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "300d6f7495a107e6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030105-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena is documented. Talc is documented. Talc has no security advisory. Gneiss is not documented. Gneiss is localized. Talc is not reverted. Pumice is signed. Galena is not reverted. Galena has a feature toggle. Pumice is localized. Talc is localized. Galena is not signed. Galena has a security advisory.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here is signed, thus it is experimental. Provision 2: when the build here is documented while is reverted, thus it is not compiled. Provision 3: when the build here is documented while has a security advisory, thus it is compiled. Provision 3 has no effect when the build here is reverted. Provision 2 has no effect when the build here has a security advisory while is localized. Question: Would it be right to say that Galena is compiled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030105", "pair_id": "u030105-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030105-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "af08e6ac582c7e4e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030122-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Greta is a depositor. Greta is employed. Greta is not delinquent. Greta is amortized. Greta is not foreclosed. Greta is garnished. Greta has no mortgage. Greta has no cosigner. Greta is creditworthy. Greta is not solvent. Greta is not a homeowner. Greta has a guarantor.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is overdrawn and is employed, then it is bankrupt. (2) If a borrower is overdrawn and is a depositor, then it has a lien. (3) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it is pensioned. (4) If a borrower is a homeowner, then it is vetted. (5) If a borrower is solvent, then it is not indebted. (6) If a borrower has a guarantor and is foreclosed, then it is audited. (7) If a borrower has a guarantor, then it is not indebted. (8) If a borrower is overdrawn and is delinquent and is refinanced, then it is indebted. (9) If a borrower is underwritten, then it is not audited. (10) If a borrower has a cosigner, then it has no lien. (11) If a borrower is overdrawn and is garnished, then it has collateral. (12) If a borrower is overdrawn and has a guarantor and is vetted, then it has an escrow account. (13) If a borrower is creditworthy, then it is overdrawn. (2) is void if the borrower is a depositor. (1) is void if the borrower is garnished. (11) is void if the borrower is a homeowner. (8) is void if the borrower is underwritten. (6) is void if the borrower is amortized. When (8) and (5) clash, (8) prevails. When (10) and (2) clash, (10) prevails. When (7) and (8) clash, (7) prevails. When (9) and (6) clash, (9) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Greta?", "options": ["has a lien", "has collateral", "has an escrow account", "is indebted", "is bankrupt"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has collateral", "unit_id": "u030122", "pair_id": "u030122-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030122-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "11cf6e0ef9708d5a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a14", "a1", "a17", "a13"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u030122-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Greta is a depositor. Greta is employed. Greta is not delinquent. Greta is amortized. Greta is not foreclosed. Greta is not garnished. Greta has no mortgage. Greta has no cosigner. Greta is creditworthy. Greta is not solvent. Greta is not a homeowner. Greta has a guarantor.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is overdrawn and is employed, then it is bankrupt. (2) If a borrower is overdrawn and is a depositor, then it has a lien. (3) If a borrower has a mortgage, then it is pensioned. (4) If a borrower is a homeowner, then it is vetted. (5) If a borrower is solvent, then it is not indebted. (6) If a borrower has a guarantor and is foreclosed, then it is audited. (7) If a borrower has a guarantor, then it is not indebted. (8) If a borrower is overdrawn and is delinquent and is refinanced, then it is indebted. (9) If a borrower is underwritten, then it is not audited. (10) If a borrower has a cosigner, then it has no lien. (11) If a borrower is overdrawn and is garnished, then it has collateral. (12) If a borrower is overdrawn and has a guarantor and is vetted, then it has an escrow account. (13) If a borrower is creditworthy, then it is overdrawn. (2) is void if the borrower is a depositor. (1) is void if the borrower is garnished. (11) is void if the borrower is a homeowner. (8) is void if the borrower is underwritten. (6) is void if the borrower is amortized. When (8) and (5) clash, (8) prevails. When (10) and (2) clash, (10) prevails. When (7) and (8) clash, (7) prevails. When (9) and (6) clash, (9) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Greta?", "options": ["has a lien", "has collateral", "has an escrow account", "is indebted", "is bankrupt"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is bankrupt", "unit_id": "u030122", "pair_id": "u030122-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030122-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "57010e2f649d2480", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a14", "a1", "a17", "a13"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u030136-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is waitlisted. Vilja has no chaperone.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is ambulatory: then it is contagious. Policy II. Suppose that patient is vaccinated: then it is ambulatory. Policy III. Suppose that patient has no chaperone: then it is not admitted. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is not admitted: then it is not contagious. Question: Is it so that Vilja is contagious?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030136", "pair_id": "u030136-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030136-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "f273b792dbe568e8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030136-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is waitlisted. Vilja has no chaperone.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is ambulatory: then it is contagious. Policy II. Suppose that patient is waitlisted: then it has a caregiver. Policy III. Suppose that patient is vaccinated: then it is ambulatory. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has no chaperone: then it is not admitted. Policy V. Suppose that patient is not admitted: then it is not contagious. Question: Is it so that Vilja is contagious?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030136", "pair_id": "u030136-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030136-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "1747a191a00e4872", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030136-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is waitlisted. Vilja has no chaperone.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is ambulatory, it then is contagious. #2 Each time a patient is vaccinated, it then is ambulatory. #3 Each time a patient has no chaperone, it then is not admitted. #4 Each time a patient is not admitted, it then is not contagious. Question: Do the terms above show that Vilja is contagious?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030136", "pair_id": "u030136-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030136-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "f273b792dbe568e8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030136-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Vilja is waitlisted. Vilja has no chaperone.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient is ambulatory, it then is contagious. #2 Each time a patient is waitlisted, it then has a caregiver. #3 Each time a patient is vaccinated, it then is ambulatory. #4 Each time a patient has no chaperone, it then is not admitted. #5 Each time a patient is not admitted, it then is not contagious. Question: Do the terms above show that Vilja is contagious?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030136", "pair_id": "u030136-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030136-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "1747a191a00e4872", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030162-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf has a pulse rate of 17. Benedek is triaged. Yusuf is not triaged. Yusuf is symptomatic. Zora is bedridden. Zora has a pulse rate of 69. Cosima is symptomatic. Cosima is not bedridden. Yusuf is bedridden. Benedek is bedridden. Benedek is symptomatic. Zora is not triaged.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 36, it thereby is postoperative. Point B. If said patient is triaged, it thereby is not postoperative. Point B is cancelled if said patient is not bedridden. Point B supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Yusuf is not symptomatic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030162", "pair_id": "u030162-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030162-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "15e1bec811658d1f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030162-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf has a pulse rate of 17. Benedek is triaged. Yusuf is not triaged. Yusuf is not symptomatic. Zora is bedridden. Zora has a pulse rate of 69. Cosima is symptomatic. Cosima is not bedridden. Yusuf is bedridden. Benedek is bedridden. Benedek is symptomatic. Zora is not triaged.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 36, it thereby is postoperative. Point B. If said patient is triaged, it thereby is not postoperative. Point B is cancelled if said patient is not bedridden. Point B supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Yusuf is not symptomatic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030162", "pair_id": "u030162-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030162-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fbcb7e84aa971d46", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030165-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has a peril factor of 23. Agata is not subrogated. Yara is not subrogated. Agata is uninsurable. Agata has a peril factor of 1. Fabian is subrogated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is grandfathered, it also has a deductible waiver. Clause 2: once any policyholder has a peril factor of 18 or more, it also is grandfathered. Clause 3: once any policyholder is uninsurable, it also is inspected. Clause 4: once any policyholder has a rider, it also has no dashcam. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 1, it also is covered. Clause 6: once any policyholder has a peril factor of 29 or less, it also is not reimbursed. Clause 7: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also has a rider. Clause 8: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also has a dashcam. Clause 9: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also has roadside assistance. Question: Does it follow that Agata has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030165", "pair_id": "u030165-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030165-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "46e722d66a01683e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u030165-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara has a peril factor of 23. Agata is not subrogated. Yara is not subrogated. Agata is uninsurable. Agata has a peril factor of 1. Fabian is subrogated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is grandfathered, it also has a deductible waiver. Clause 2: once any policyholder has a peril factor of 18 or more, it also is grandfathered. Clause 3: once any policyholder is uninsurable, it also is inspected. Clause 4: once any policyholder has a rider, it also has no dashcam. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a peril factor under 49, it also is covered. Clause 6: once any policyholder has a peril factor of 29 or less, it also is not reimbursed. Clause 7: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also has a rider. Clause 8: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver, it also has a dashcam. Clause 9: once any policyholder is subrogated, it also has roadside assistance. Question: Does it follow that Agata has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030165", "pair_id": "u030165-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030165-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "935ec72aa3d3383b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u030166-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice has a lint backlog of 61. Pumice has a test yield of 84. Pumice is not backported. Pumice is notarized. Pumice is not signed. Pumice is minified. Pumice is not linted. Pumice has a defect tally of 17.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is versioned, and is not signed, and is minified, that build has no changelog. Item B. When the build has a defect tally of less than 22, and is notarized, that build is versioned. Item C. When the build is not versioned, and has a test yield of no more than 21, and is not minified, that build has a security advisory. Item D. When the build is not linted, that build is not obsolete. Item E. When the build is versioned, and is signed, and has a test yield of no less than 35, that build has a changelog. Item F. When the build is not minified, and is backported, that build is benchmarked. Item F is suspended when the build has a patch cycle of no more than 64. Item D is suspended when the build is not signed. Item C is suspended when the build is not signed. Item E is suspended when the build has a patch cycle of no more than 42, and has a lint backlog of less than 70. Question: Can one infer that Pumice has a changelog?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030166", "pair_id": "u030166-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030166-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9aa66d777b1aa4c0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030166-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice has a lint backlog of 61. Pumice has a test yield of 84. Pumice is not backported. Pumice is notarized. Pumice is not signed. Pumice is minified. Pumice is linted. Pumice has a defect tally of 17.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is versioned, and is not signed, and is minified, that build has no changelog. Item B. When the build has a defect tally of less than 22, and is notarized, that build is versioned. Item C. When the build is not versioned, and has a test yield of no more than 21, and is not minified, that build has a security advisory. Item D. When the build is not linted, that build is not obsolete. Item E. When the build is versioned, and is signed, and has a test yield of no less than 35, that build has a changelog. Item F. When the build is not minified, and is backported, that build is benchmarked. Item F is suspended when the build has a patch cycle of no more than 64. Item D is suspended when the build is not signed. Item C is suspended when the build is not signed. Item E is suspended when the build has a patch cycle of no more than 42, and has a lint backlog of less than 70. Question: Can one infer that Pumice has a changelog?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030166", "pair_id": "u030166-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030166-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a6aad94b1d7331b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030183-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel is diabetic. Zora is fasting. Xenia is not asthmatic. Zora is pregnant. Zora is not asthmatic. Aurel is not hypertensive. Aurel has a pain level of 95. Florin is hypertensive. Zora is hypertensive. Zora has a pain level of 35. Zora is allergic. Zora has a pulse rate of 12. Aurel has a mobility rank of 55. Florin has a pain level of 23. Zora is not diabetic. Aurel is not fasting. Zora has a mobility rank of 74. Xenia has a pulse rate of 71. Xenia has a pain level of 67.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is not postoperative provided that it is bedridden as well as is fasting as well as has a pain level of 81 or lower. Section 2: a patient is contagious provided that it is diabetic as well as is fasting as well as has a pain level of 43 or lower. Section 3: a patient is bedridden provided that it is anemic as well as has a pulse rate lower than 25. Section 4: a patient is postoperative provided that it is bedridden as well as is not fasting. Section 5: a patient is anemic provided that it is pregnant. Section 2 lapses for a patient if it has a mobility rank of 65 or lower. Section 5 lapses for a patient if it is asthmatic as well as is hypertensive. Question: Zora is not postoperative. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030183", "pair_id": "u030183-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030183-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c55c70b7ffa38f7d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u030183-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel is diabetic. Zora is fasting. Xenia is not asthmatic. Zora is pregnant. Zora is not asthmatic. Aurel is not hypertensive. Aurel has a pain level of 95. Florin is hypertensive. Zora is hypertensive. Zora has a pain level of 35. Zora is allergic. Zora has a pulse rate of 12. Aurel has a mobility rank of 55. Florin has a pain level of 23. Zora is diabetic. Aurel is not fasting. Zora has a mobility rank of 74. Xenia has a pulse rate of 71. Xenia has a pain level of 67.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is not postoperative provided that it is bedridden as well as is fasting as well as has a pain level of 81 or lower. Section 2: a patient is contagious provided that it is diabetic as well as is fasting as well as has a pain level of 43 or lower. Section 3: a patient is bedridden provided that it is anemic as well as has a pulse rate lower than 25. Section 4: a patient is postoperative provided that it is bedridden as well as is not fasting. Section 5: a patient is anemic provided that it is pregnant. Section 2 lapses for a patient if it has a mobility rank of 65 or lower. Section 5 lapses for a patient if it is asthmatic as well as is hypertensive. Question: Zora is not postoperative. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030183", "pair_id": "u030183-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030183-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c2e403d827e1a116", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u030183-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel is diabetic. Zora is fasting. Xenia is not asthmatic. Zora is pregnant. Zora is not asthmatic. Aurel is not hypertensive. Aurel has a pain level of 95. Florin is hypertensive. Zora is hypertensive. Zora has a pain level of 35. Zora is allergic. Zora has a pulse rate of 12. Aurel has a mobility rank of 55. Florin has a pain level of 23. Zora is not diabetic. Aurel is not fasting. Zora has a mobility rank of 74. Xenia has a pulse rate of 71. Xenia has a pain level of 67.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is bedridden plus is fasting plus has a pain level no higher than 81: then it is not postoperative. Policy II. Suppose that patient is diabetic plus is fasting plus has a pain level no higher than 43: then it is contagious. Policy III. Suppose that patient is anemic plus has a pulse rate smaller than 25: then it is bedridden. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is bedridden plus is not fasting: then it is postoperative. Policy V. Suppose that patient is pregnant: then it is anemic. Policy II is waived if that patient has a mobility rank no higher than 65. Policy V is waived if that patient is asthmatic plus is hypertensive. Question: Is it so that Zora is not postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030183", "pair_id": "u030183-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030183-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c55c70b7ffa38f7d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u030183-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aurel is diabetic. Zora is fasting. Xenia is not asthmatic. Zora is pregnant. Zora is not asthmatic. Aurel is not hypertensive. Aurel has a pain level of 95. Florin is hypertensive. Zora is hypertensive. Zora has a pain level of 35. Zora is allergic. Zora has a pulse rate of 12. Aurel has a mobility rank of 55. Florin has a pain level of 23. Zora is diabetic. Aurel is not fasting. Zora has a mobility rank of 74. Xenia has a pulse rate of 71. Xenia has a pain level of 67.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is bedridden plus is fasting plus has a pain level no higher than 81: then it is not postoperative. Policy II. Suppose that patient is diabetic plus is fasting plus has a pain level no higher than 43: then it is contagious. Policy III. Suppose that patient is anemic plus has a pulse rate smaller than 25: then it is bedridden. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is bedridden plus is not fasting: then it is postoperative. Policy V. Suppose that patient is pregnant: then it is anemic. Policy II is waived if that patient has a mobility rank no higher than 65. Policy V is waived if that patient is asthmatic plus is hypertensive. Question: Is it so that Zora is not postoperative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030183", "pair_id": "u030183-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030183-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c2e403d827e1a116", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u030201-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian has a feature toggle. Obsidian is compiled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is tested: then it is not merged. Policy II. Suppose that build is not linted: then it has no migration script. Policy III. Suppose that build is not flaky: then it has a security advisory. Policy IV. Suppose that build is not linted: then it has no changelog. Policy V. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is merged. Policy VI. Suppose that build is tested: then it has a migration script. Policy VII. Suppose that build is compiled: then it has a changelog. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is not fuzzed: then it is tested. Policy III is waived if that build is linted. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy VII. Question: Which choice is right for Obsidian?", "options": ["has a migration script", "is merged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is merged", "unit_id": "u030201", "pair_id": "u030201-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030201-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "50ad3f872123e512", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a9"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030201-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian has a feature toggle. Obsidian is not fuzzed. Obsidian is compiled.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is tested: then it is not merged. Policy II. Suppose that build is not linted: then it has no migration script. Policy III. Suppose that build is not flaky: then it has a security advisory. Policy IV. Suppose that build is not linted: then it has no changelog. Policy V. Suppose that build has a changelog: then it is merged. Policy VI. Suppose that build is tested: then it has a migration script. Policy VII. Suppose that build is compiled: then it has a changelog. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is not fuzzed: then it is tested. Policy III is waived if that build is linted. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy VII. Question: Which choice is right for Obsidian?", "options": ["has a migration script", "is merged"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a migration script", "unit_id": "u030201", "pair_id": "u030201-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030201-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "56fc863d0161adef", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a9"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030237-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia is undeliverable. Saskia has a barcode. Thilo is not weighed. Saskia is not hazardous. Thilo is not stamped. Thilo is consolidated. Thilo is damaged. Thilo has a courier. Saskia has no waybill. Thilo has no barcode. Thilo is not undeliverable. Thilo is hazardous. Saskia is stamped. Saskia is not damaged.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a waybill and is sealed, then it is perishable. (2) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a locker slot and is undeliverable, then it is fragile. (3) If a parcel is refrigerated and is sealed and has a courier, then it is tracked. (4) If a parcel is consolidated and is hazardous, then it is refrigerated. (5) If a parcel is palletized and is stamped, then it is registered. (6) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a barcode, then it is prepaid. (7) If a parcel is refrigerated and is damaged, then it is delayed. (6) is void if the parcel has a waybill. (7) is void if the parcel is sealed. (3) is void if the parcel is weighed. Question: Which option holds for Thilo?", "options": ["is fragile", "is perishable", "is tracked", "is delayed", "is prepaid"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is delayed", "unit_id": "u030237", "pair_id": "u030237-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030237-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "22687d5ba6137fc4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a13", "a15", "a7", "a8"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u030237-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Saskia is undeliverable. Saskia has a barcode. Thilo is not weighed. Saskia is not hazardous. Thilo is sealed. Thilo is not stamped. Thilo is consolidated. Thilo is damaged. Thilo has a courier. Saskia has no waybill. Thilo has no barcode. Thilo is not undeliverable. Thilo is hazardous. Saskia is stamped. Saskia is not damaged.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a waybill and is sealed, then it is perishable. (2) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a locker slot and is undeliverable, then it is fragile. (3) If a parcel is refrigerated and is sealed and has a courier, then it is tracked. (4) If a parcel is consolidated and is hazardous, then it is refrigerated. (5) If a parcel is palletized and is stamped, then it is registered. (6) If a parcel is refrigerated and has a barcode, then it is prepaid. (7) If a parcel is refrigerated and is damaged, then it is delayed. (6) is void if the parcel has a waybill. (7) is void if the parcel is sealed. (3) is void if the parcel is weighed. Question: Which option holds for Thilo?", "options": ["is fragile", "is perishable", "is tracked", "is delayed", "is prepaid"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u030237", "pair_id": "u030237-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/4", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030237-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a795cf43d14df622", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a5", "a13", "a15", "a7", "a8"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u030245-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri is not uninsurable. Dmitri is appraised. Dmitri is not indemnified. Dmitri is not retired.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is retired and is uninsurable, then it has flood coverage. (2) If a policyholder is not retired and is not uninsurable, then it has no flood coverage. (3) If a policyholder is not indemnified and is not retired, then it is reimbursed. (2) is void if the policyholder is retired and has a premium band below 22. Question: Is it true that Dmitri has flood coverage?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030245", "pair_id": "u030245-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030245-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d16b1f0497a50f5e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u030245-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri is not uninsurable. Dmitri is appraised. Dmitri is not indemnified. Dmitri is not retired.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is retired and is uninsurable, then it has flood coverage. (2) If a policyholder is retired and is not uninsurable, then it has no flood coverage. (3) If a policyholder is not indemnified and is not retired, then it is reimbursed. (2) is void if the policyholder is retired and has a premium band below 22. Question: Is it true that Dmitri has flood coverage?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030245", "pair_id": "u030245-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030245-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d902a3ffb8329d01", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u030245-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri is not uninsurable. Dmitri is appraised. Dmitri is not indemnified. Dmitri is not retired.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is retired and also is uninsurable, it also has flood coverage. Clause 2: once any policyholder is not retired and also is not uninsurable, it also has no flood coverage. Clause 3: once any policyholder is not indemnified and also is not retired, it also is reimbursed. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is retired and also has a premium band under 22. Question: Does it follow that Dmitri has flood coverage?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030245", "pair_id": "u030245-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030245-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d16b1f0497a50f5e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u030245-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri is not uninsurable. Dmitri is appraised. Dmitri is not indemnified. Dmitri is not retired.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is retired and also is uninsurable, it also has flood coverage. Clause 2: once any policyholder is retired and also is not uninsurable, it also has no flood coverage. Clause 3: once any policyholder is not indemnified and also is not retired, it also is reimbursed. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is retired and also has a premium band under 22. Question: Does it follow that Dmitri has flood coverage?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030245", "pair_id": "u030245-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030245-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d902a3ffb8329d01", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u030245-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri is not uninsurable. Dmitri is appraised. Dmitri is not indemnified. Dmitri is not retired.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is retired, and is uninsurable, that policyholder has flood coverage. Item B. When the policyholder is not retired, and is not uninsurable, that policyholder has no flood coverage. Item C. When the policyholder is not indemnified, and is not retired, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item B is suspended when the policyholder is retired, and has a premium band of less than 22. Question: Can one infer that Dmitri has flood coverage?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030245", "pair_id": "u030245-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030245-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d16b1f0497a50f5e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u030245-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dmitri is not uninsurable. Dmitri is appraised. Dmitri is not indemnified. Dmitri is not retired.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is retired, and is uninsurable, that policyholder has flood coverage. Item B. When the policyholder is retired, and is not uninsurable, that policyholder has no flood coverage. Item C. When the policyholder is not indemnified, and is not retired, that policyholder is reimbursed. Item B is suspended when the policyholder is retired, and has a premium band of less than 22. Question: Can one infer that Dmitri has flood coverage?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030245", "pair_id": "u030245-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030245-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d902a3ffb8329d01", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u030281-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aldebaran has a milestone total of 54. Aldebaran has no steering committee. Capella has industry backing. Aldebaran has a review mark of 61. Aldebaran has industry backing. Aldebaran is a pilot study. Aldebaran is translational. Capella has a team size of 53. Aldebaran has a team size of 22.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is renewed provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as is a pilot study. Section 2: a proposal has a postdoc provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as has a citation index of 63 or lower. Section 3: a proposal is interdisciplinary provided that it is translational as well as has no industry backing. Section 4: a proposal is budgeted provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as has a review mark of 78 or higher. Section 5: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as is not a pilot study. Section 6: a proposal is cofunded provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as has a team size exceeding 28. Section 7: a proposal is multicenter provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as has a review mark lower than 78 as well as is not resubmitted. Section 8: a proposal is shortlisted provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as has a team size of 28 or lower as well as has a steering committee. Section 9: a proposal has a patent filing provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as has a citation index exceeding 63. Question: Which statement fits Aldebaran?", "options": ["is shortlisted", "is budgeted", "has a postdoc", "has a patent filing", "is multicenter", "is renewed", "has ethics clearance", "is cofunded"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is renewed", "unit_id": "u030281", "pair_id": "u030281-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030281-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d2261ea6927b1d00", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a6", "a17", "a14", "a11", "a2", "a9", "a16"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030281-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aldebaran has a milestone total of 54. Aldebaran has no steering committee. Capella has industry backing. Aldebaran has a review mark of 61. Aldebaran has industry backing. Aldebaran is a pilot study. Aldebaran is not translational. Capella has a team size of 53. Aldebaran has a team size of 22.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is renewed provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as is a pilot study. Section 2: a proposal has a postdoc provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as has a citation index of 63 or lower. Section 3: a proposal is interdisciplinary provided that it is translational as well as has no industry backing. Section 4: a proposal is budgeted provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as has a review mark of 78 or higher. Section 5: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as is not a pilot study. Section 6: a proposal is cofunded provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as has a team size exceeding 28. Section 7: a proposal is multicenter provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as has a review mark lower than 78 as well as is not resubmitted. Section 8: a proposal is shortlisted provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as has a team size of 28 or lower as well as has a steering committee. Section 9: a proposal has a patent filing provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 51 as well as has a citation index exceeding 63. Question: Which statement fits Aldebaran?", "options": ["is shortlisted", "is budgeted", "has a postdoc", "has a patent filing", "is multicenter", "is renewed", "has ethics clearance", "is cofunded"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is renewed", "unit_id": "u030281", "pair_id": "u030281-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030281-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "96f8614be6f6c58b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a6", "a17", "a14", "a11", "a2", "a9", "a16"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030299-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is contagious. Wendel has a mobility rank of 45. Yusuf has a fever reading of 21. Wendel is contagious. Gunnar is rescheduled. Wendel is not rescheduled. Gunnar has a fever reading of 69. Yusuf is admitted. Wendel is admitted. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 35. Wendel has a fever reading of 56.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is vaccinated, then it has a pacemaker. (2) If a patient has a pacemaker, then it has a chaperone. (3) If a patient is contagious, then it is not triaged. (4) If a patient is contagious, then it is triaged. (5) If a patient has a fever reading above 39, then it is vaccinated. (6) If a patient has a mobility rank of at most 81, then it has no chaperone. (7) If a patient is rescheduled, then it is not vaccinated. (8) If a patient is admitted, then it is symptomatic. (9) If a patient is allergic, then it is discharged. (10) If a patient has an interpreter, then it is allergic. (11) If a patient has a fever reading above 57, then it is not symptomatic. (12) If a patient has a fever reading of at most 39, then it has an interpreter. When (3) and (4) clash, (3) prevails. When (2) and (6) clash, (2) prevails. When (7) and (5) clash, (7) prevails. When (8) and (11) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Wendel?", "options": ["has a chaperone", "is discharged"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a chaperone", "unit_id": "u030299", "pair_id": "u030299-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030299-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "39b42a2ba9ebb7fd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030299-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is contagious. Wendel has a mobility rank of 45. Yusuf has a fever reading of 21. Wendel is contagious. Gunnar is rescheduled. Wendel is not rescheduled. Gunnar has a fever reading of 69. Yusuf is admitted. Wendel is admitted. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 35. Wendel has a fever reading of 0.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is vaccinated, then it has a pacemaker. (2) If a patient has a pacemaker, then it has a chaperone. (3) If a patient is contagious, then it is not triaged. (4) If a patient is contagious, then it is triaged. (5) If a patient has a fever reading above 39, then it is vaccinated. (6) If a patient has a mobility rank of at most 81, then it has no chaperone. (7) If a patient is rescheduled, then it is not vaccinated. (8) If a patient is admitted, then it is symptomatic. (9) If a patient is allergic, then it is discharged. (10) If a patient has an interpreter, then it is allergic. (11) If a patient has a fever reading above 57, then it is not symptomatic. (12) If a patient has a fever reading of at most 39, then it has an interpreter. When (3) and (4) clash, (3) prevails. When (2) and (6) clash, (2) prevails. When (7) and (5) clash, (7) prevails. When (8) and (11) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Wendel?", "options": ["has a chaperone", "is discharged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is discharged", "unit_id": "u030299", "pair_id": "u030299-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030299-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f2a388f9e317a830", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030299-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is contagious. Wendel has a mobility rank of 45. Yusuf has a fever reading of 21. Wendel is contagious. Gunnar is rescheduled. Wendel is not rescheduled. Gunnar has a fever reading of 69. Yusuf is admitted. Wendel is admitted. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 35. Wendel has a fever reading of 56.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is vaccinated, it also has a pacemaker. Clause 2: once any patient has a pacemaker, it also has a chaperone. Clause 3: once any patient is contagious, it also is not triaged. Clause 4: once any patient is contagious, it also is triaged. Clause 5: once any patient has a fever reading over 39, it also is vaccinated. Clause 6: once any patient has a mobility rank of 81 or less, it also has no chaperone. Clause 7: once any patient is rescheduled, it also is not vaccinated. Clause 8: once any patient is admitted, it also is symptomatic. Clause 9: once any patient is allergic, it also is discharged. Clause 10: once any patient has an interpreter, it also is allergic. Clause 11: once any patient has a fever reading over 57, it also is not symptomatic. Clause 12: once any patient has a fever reading of 39 or less, it also has an interpreter. Clause 3 overrides Clause 4. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 7 overrides Clause 5. Clause 8 overrides Clause 11. Question: Which of these is true of Wendel?", "options": ["has a chaperone", "is discharged"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a chaperone", "unit_id": "u030299", "pair_id": "u030299-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030299-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "39b42a2ba9ebb7fd", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030299-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Yusuf is contagious. Wendel has a mobility rank of 45. Yusuf has a fever reading of 21. Wendel is contagious. Gunnar is rescheduled. Wendel is not rescheduled. Gunnar has a fever reading of 69. Yusuf is admitted. Wendel is admitted. Gunnar has a mobility rank of 35. Wendel has a fever reading of 0.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is vaccinated, it also has a pacemaker. Clause 2: once any patient has a pacemaker, it also has a chaperone. Clause 3: once any patient is contagious, it also is not triaged. Clause 4: once any patient is contagious, it also is triaged. Clause 5: once any patient has a fever reading over 39, it also is vaccinated. Clause 6: once any patient has a mobility rank of 81 or less, it also has no chaperone. Clause 7: once any patient is rescheduled, it also is not vaccinated. Clause 8: once any patient is admitted, it also is symptomatic. Clause 9: once any patient is allergic, it also is discharged. Clause 10: once any patient has an interpreter, it also is allergic. Clause 11: once any patient has a fever reading over 57, it also is not symptomatic. Clause 12: once any patient has a fever reading of 39 or less, it also has an interpreter. Clause 3 overrides Clause 4. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Clause 7 overrides Clause 5. Clause 8 overrides Clause 11. Question: Which of these is true of Wendel?", "options": ["has a chaperone", "is discharged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is discharged", "unit_id": "u030299", "pair_id": "u030299-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030299-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f2a388f9e317a830", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030314-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a delivery window of 88. Quentin is stamped. Mirela has a delivery window of 62. Quentin has a barcode. Ulla has a barcode. Nandor has a delivery window of 6. Mirela is stamped. Ulla is stamped. Ulla is not prepaid.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is misrouted provided that it is labeled. Section 2: a parcel is labeled provided that it is registered. Section 3: a parcel is weighed provided that it has a barcode. Section 4: a parcel is scanned provided that it is fragile. Section 5: a parcel is delayed provided that it is stamped. Section 6: a parcel is registered provided that it has a delivery window of 59 or lower. Section 7: a parcel is not misrouted provided that it is fragile. Section 8: a parcel is fragile provided that it is delayed. Section 9: a parcel is perishable provided that it is prepaid. Question: Quentin is misrouted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030314", "pair_id": "u030314-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030314-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "ad9f6569d94f4b0a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030314-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a delivery window of 88. Quentin is prepaid. Quentin is stamped. Mirela has a delivery window of 62. Quentin has a barcode. Ulla has a barcode. Nandor has a delivery window of 6. Mirela is stamped. Ulla is stamped. Ulla is not prepaid.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is misrouted provided that it is labeled. Section 2: a parcel is labeled provided that it is registered. Section 3: a parcel is weighed provided that it has a barcode. Section 4: a parcel is scanned provided that it is fragile. Section 5: a parcel is delayed provided that it is stamped. Section 6: a parcel is registered provided that it has a delivery window of 59 or lower. Section 7: a parcel is not misrouted provided that it is fragile. Section 8: a parcel is fragile provided that it is delayed. Section 9: a parcel is perishable provided that it is prepaid. Question: Quentin is misrouted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030314", "pair_id": "u030314-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030314-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "d23d2ec843b7de83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030314-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a delivery window of 88. Quentin is stamped. Mirela has a delivery window of 62. Quentin has a barcode. Ulla has a barcode. Nandor has a delivery window of 6. Mirela is stamped. Ulla is stamped. Ulla is not prepaid.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is labeled: then it is misrouted. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is registered: then it is labeled. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is weighed. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is scanned. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is stamped: then it is delayed. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window no higher than 59: then it is registered. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is not misrouted. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it is fragile. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is prepaid: then it is perishable. Question: Is it so that Quentin is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030314", "pair_id": "u030314-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030314-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "ad9f6569d94f4b0a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030314-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a delivery window of 88. Quentin is prepaid. Quentin is stamped. Mirela has a delivery window of 62. Quentin has a barcode. Ulla has a barcode. Nandor has a delivery window of 6. Mirela is stamped. Ulla is stamped. Ulla is not prepaid.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is labeled: then it is misrouted. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is registered: then it is labeled. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is weighed. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is scanned. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is stamped: then it is delayed. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window no higher than 59: then it is registered. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is not misrouted. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it is fragile. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is prepaid: then it is perishable. Question: Is it so that Quentin is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030314", "pair_id": "u030314-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030314-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "d23d2ec843b7de83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030314-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a delivery window of 88. Quentin is stamped. Mirela has a delivery window of 62. Quentin has a barcode. Ulla has a barcode. Nandor has a delivery window of 6. Mirela is stamped. Ulla is stamped. Ulla is not prepaid.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is labeled, it then is misrouted. #2 Each time a parcel is registered, it then is labeled. #3 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is weighed. #4 Each time a parcel is fragile, it then is scanned. #5 Each time a parcel is stamped, it then is delayed. #6 Each time a parcel has a delivery window of 59 or below, it then is registered. #7 Each time a parcel is fragile, it then is not misrouted. #8 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then is fragile. #9 Each time a parcel is prepaid, it then is perishable. Question: Do the terms above show that Quentin is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030314", "pair_id": "u030314-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030314-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "ad9f6569d94f4b0a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030314-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla has a delivery window of 88. Quentin is prepaid. Quentin is stamped. Mirela has a delivery window of 62. Quentin has a barcode. Ulla has a barcode. Nandor has a delivery window of 6. Mirela is stamped. Ulla is stamped. Ulla is not prepaid.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is labeled, it then is misrouted. #2 Each time a parcel is registered, it then is labeled. #3 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is weighed. #4 Each time a parcel is fragile, it then is scanned. #5 Each time a parcel is stamped, it then is delayed. #6 Each time a parcel has a delivery window of 59 or below, it then is registered. #7 Each time a parcel is fragile, it then is not misrouted. #8 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then is fragile. #9 Each time a parcel is prepaid, it then is perishable. Question: Do the terms above show that Quentin is misrouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030314", "pair_id": "u030314-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030314-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "d23d2ec843b7de83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030330-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has a payout ceiling of 22. Viggo has a claim frequency of 50.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a payout ceiling of at most 21, then it is reinstated. (2) If a policyholder is indemnified, then it has a beneficiary. (3) If a policyholder has a rider, then it is a claimant. (4) If a policyholder is a claimant, then it is reimbursed. (5) If a policyholder is retired, then it has an adjuster. (6) If a policyholder has a payout ceiling above 21, then it has a rider. (7) If a policyholder has a dashcam, then it is retired. (8) If a policyholder is reinstated, then it is inspected. (9) If a policyholder is inspected, then it is a smoker. (10) If a policyholder has a claim frequency of at least 54, then it is covered. (11) If a policyholder has an adjuster, then it is appraised. Question: Which option holds for Viggo?", "options": ["is appraised", "is a smoker", "is reimbursed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is reimbursed", "unit_id": "u030330", "pair_id": "u030330-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030330-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "0bc36668a1006165", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a7", "a14"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u030330-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has a payout ceiling of 10. Viggo has a claim frequency of 50.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a payout ceiling of at most 21, then it is reinstated. (2) If a policyholder is indemnified, then it has a beneficiary. (3) If a policyholder has a rider, then it is a claimant. (4) If a policyholder is a claimant, then it is reimbursed. (5) If a policyholder is retired, then it has an adjuster. (6) If a policyholder has a payout ceiling above 21, then it has a rider. (7) If a policyholder has a dashcam, then it is retired. (8) If a policyholder is reinstated, then it is inspected. (9) If a policyholder is inspected, then it is a smoker. (10) If a policyholder has a claim frequency of at least 54, then it is covered. (11) If a policyholder has an adjuster, then it is appraised. Question: Which option holds for Viggo?", "options": ["is appraised", "is a smoker", "is reimbursed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a smoker", "unit_id": "u030330", "pair_id": "u030330-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030330-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "a70f4909ba1c448d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a7", "a14"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u030353-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is tracked. Priya is not prepaid. Priya is not tracked. Quentin is not prepaid. Priya is stamped.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is refrigerated and is not prepaid, then it is not sealed. (2) If a parcel is stamped, then it is sealed. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Quentin is tracked?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030353", "pair_id": "u030353-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030353-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6bdf7e6c1723aec6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030353-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is tracked. Priya is not prepaid. Priya is not tracked. Quentin is not prepaid. Priya is stamped. Quentin is not stamped.", "instruction": "(1) If a parcel is refrigerated and is not prepaid, then it is not sealed. (2) If a parcel is stamped, then it is sealed. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Quentin is tracked?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030353", "pair_id": "u030353-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030353-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6c09151bc40cfa79", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030353-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is tracked. Priya is not prepaid. Priya is not tracked. Quentin is not prepaid. Priya is stamped.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is refrigerated and also is not prepaid, it also is not sealed. Clause 2: once any parcel is stamped, it also is sealed. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Quentin is tracked?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030353", "pair_id": "u030353-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030353-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6bdf7e6c1723aec6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030353-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is tracked. Priya is not prepaid. Priya is not tracked. Quentin is not prepaid. Priya is stamped. Quentin is not stamped.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is refrigerated and also is not prepaid, it also is not sealed. Clause 2: once any parcel is stamped, it also is sealed. Clause 1 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Quentin is tracked?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030353", "pair_id": "u030353-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030353-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6c09151bc40cfa79", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030356-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is subrogated. Fabian has an adjuster. Fabian is not inspected. Fabian is reinstated. Agata is not inspected. Fabian has a premium discount.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a rider, then it is not grandfathered. (2) If a policyholder is grandfathered and has a premium discount and is reinstated, then it has no dashcam. (3) If a policyholder is subrogated, then it has roadside assistance. (4) If a policyholder is inspected, then it has a rider. (5) If a policyholder has roadside assistance, then it is grandfathered. (6) If a policyholder is grandfathered and is inspected and is subrogated, then it has a dashcam. (7) If a policyholder has no adjuster, then it is not bundled. (3) is void if the policyholder is reimbursed. When (5) and (1) clash, (5) prevails. When (6) and (2) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Fabian has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030356", "pair_id": "u030356-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030356-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "22578e7db71c645f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030356-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is subrogated. Fabian has an adjuster. Fabian is not inspected. Fabian is reinstated. Agata is not inspected. Fabian has a premium discount.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder has a rider, then it is not grandfathered. (2) If a policyholder is grandfathered and has a premium discount and is reinstated, then it has no dashcam. (3) If a policyholder is subrogated, then it has roadside assistance. (4) If a policyholder is inspected, then it has a rider. (5) If a policyholder has roadside assistance, then it is grandfathered. (6) If a policyholder is grandfathered and is inspected and is subrogated, then it has a dashcam. (7) If a policyholder has an adjuster, then it is not bundled. (3) is void if the policyholder is reimbursed. When (5) and (1) clash, (5) prevails. When (6) and (2) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Is it true that Fabian has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030356", "pair_id": "u030356-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030356-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4581f5d4689f94ca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030356-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is subrogated. Fabian has an adjuster. Fabian is not inspected. Fabian is reinstated. Agata is not inspected. Fabian has a premium discount.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a rider, that policyholder is not grandfathered. Item B. When the policyholder is grandfathered, and has a premium discount, and is reinstated, that policyholder has no dashcam. Item C. When the policyholder is subrogated, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item D. When the policyholder is inspected, that policyholder has a rider. Item E. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item F. When the policyholder is grandfathered, and is inspected, and is subrogated, that policyholder has a dashcam. Item G. When the policyholder has no adjuster, that policyholder is not bundled. Item C is suspended when the policyholder is reimbursed. Item E outranks Item A. Item F outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Fabian has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030356", "pair_id": "u030356-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030356-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "22578e7db71c645f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030356-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fabian is subrogated. Fabian has an adjuster. Fabian is not inspected. Fabian is reinstated. Agata is not inspected. Fabian has a premium discount.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a rider, that policyholder is not grandfathered. Item B. When the policyholder is grandfathered, and has a premium discount, and is reinstated, that policyholder has no dashcam. Item C. When the policyholder is subrogated, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item D. When the policyholder is inspected, that policyholder has a rider. Item E. When the policyholder has roadside assistance, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item F. When the policyholder is grandfathered, and is inspected, and is subrogated, that policyholder has a dashcam. Item G. When the policyholder has an adjuster, that policyholder is not bundled. Item C is suspended when the policyholder is reimbursed. Item E outranks Item A. Item F outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Fabian has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030356", "pair_id": "u030356-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030356-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4581f5d4689f94ca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030363-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse is not a homeowner. Folke is a depositor. Greta is not vetted. Greta is not a depositor. Ilse is not vetted. Greta is not indebted. Folke is foreclosed. Ilse is indebted. Folke is not a homeowner. Folke is vetted. Wiebke is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is not vetted, it also has collateral. Clause 2: once any borrower is a depositor, it also is not audited. Clause 3: once any borrower is a depositor, it also is audited. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is not foreclosed. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is a homeowner. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is indebted. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is foreclosed. Question: Does it follow that Folke is not audited?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030363", "pair_id": "u030363-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030363-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f74274900aef1748", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u030363-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse is not a homeowner. Folke is a depositor. Greta is not vetted. Greta is not a depositor. Ilse is not vetted. Greta is not indebted. Folke is foreclosed. Ilse is indebted. Folke is not a homeowner. Folke is not vetted. Wiebke is not a homeowner.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is not vetted, it also has collateral. Clause 2: once any borrower is a depositor, it also is not audited. Clause 3: once any borrower is a depositor, it also is audited. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is not foreclosed. Clause 3 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is a homeowner. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is indebted. Clause 2 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is foreclosed. Question: Does it follow that Folke is not audited?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030363", "pair_id": "u030363-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030363-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "6c11e048d0ceb355", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": true}, "attempt": 14}}
{"id": "syn-u030368-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aldebaran has a citation index of 16. Mirach has a citation index of 51. Izar is collaborative. Aldebaran is not preregistered.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is collaborative, thus it is endorsed. Provision 2: when the proposal here is not collaborative while has a citation index at or above 73, thus it is cofunded. Question: Would it be right to say that Aldebaran is a pilot study?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030368", "pair_id": "u030368-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030368-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "fa02eef95671d0aa", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030368-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aldebaran has a citation index of 16. Mirach has a citation index of 51. Aldebaran is not a pilot study. Izar is collaborative. Aldebaran is not preregistered.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is collaborative, thus it is endorsed. Provision 2: when the proposal here is not collaborative while has a citation index at or above 73, thus it is cofunded. Question: Would it be right to say that Aldebaran is a pilot study?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030368", "pair_id": "u030368-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030368-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "3e41814236bdd9c2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030368-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aldebaran has a citation index of 16. Mirach has a citation index of 51. Izar is collaborative. Aldebaran is not preregistered.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is collaborative, so it is endorsed. No. 2 While the given proposal is not collaborative and likewise has a citation index not below 73, so it is cofunded. Question: Is the claim \"Aldebaran is a pilot study\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030368", "pair_id": "u030368-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030368-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "fa02eef95671d0aa", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030368-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Aldebaran has a citation index of 16. Mirach has a citation index of 51. Aldebaran is not a pilot study. Izar is collaborative. Aldebaran is not preregistered.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal is collaborative, so it is endorsed. No. 2 While the given proposal is not collaborative and likewise has a citation index not below 73, so it is cofunded. Question: Is the claim \"Aldebaran is a pilot study\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030368", "pair_id": "u030368-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030368-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "3e41814236bdd9c2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030407-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda is a claimant. Wanda is not inspected. Wanda is uninsurable. Wanda is not subrogated. Wanda is retired. Wanda is not disputed. Wanda has a premium band of 73.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has roadside assistance provided that it is lapsed as well as is inspected. Section 2: a policyholder is covered provided that it is lapsed as well as has a peril factor lower than 32. Section 3: a policyholder is indemnified provided that it is retired. Section 4: a policyholder is lapsed provided that it is not grandfathered as well as has a premium band lower than 86. Section 5: a policyholder is not grandfathered provided that it is a claimant. Section 6: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it is lapsed as well as is uninsurable. Section 7: a policyholder is reinstated provided that it is lapsed as well as is not uninsurable. Section 8: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it is lapsed as well as is disputed. Section 6 lapses for a policyholder if it is subrogated. Section 1 lapses for a policyholder if it is disputed. Question: Which statement fits Wanda?", "options": ["has flood coverage", "is reinstated", "is covered", "has a deductible waiver", "has roadside assistance"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has flood coverage", "unit_id": "u030407", "pair_id": "u030407-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030407-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "66c425efbda91350", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a3", "a13", "a5", "a8"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030407-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda is a claimant. Wanda is not inspected. Wanda is uninsurable. Wanda is not subrogated. Wanda is not retired. Wanda is not disputed. Wanda has a premium band of 73.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has roadside assistance provided that it is lapsed as well as is inspected. Section 2: a policyholder is covered provided that it is lapsed as well as has a peril factor lower than 32. Section 3: a policyholder is indemnified provided that it is retired. Section 4: a policyholder is lapsed provided that it is not grandfathered as well as has a premium band lower than 86. Section 5: a policyholder is not grandfathered provided that it is a claimant. Section 6: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it is lapsed as well as is uninsurable. Section 7: a policyholder is reinstated provided that it is lapsed as well as is not uninsurable. Section 8: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it is lapsed as well as is disputed. Section 6 lapses for a policyholder if it is subrogated. Section 1 lapses for a policyholder if it is disputed. Question: Which statement fits Wanda?", "options": ["has flood coverage", "is reinstated", "is covered", "has a deductible waiver", "has roadside assistance"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has flood coverage", "unit_id": "u030407", "pair_id": "u030407-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030407-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ab43292945a7fcfe", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a3", "a13", "a5", "a8"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030407-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda is a claimant. Wanda is not inspected. Wanda is uninsurable. Wanda is not subrogated. Wanda is retired. Wanda is not disputed. Wanda has a premium band of 73.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is lapsed and additionally is inspected, it then has roadside assistance. #2 Each time a policyholder is lapsed and additionally has a peril factor less than 32, it then is covered. #3 Each time a policyholder is retired, it then is indemnified. #4 Each time a policyholder is not grandfathered and additionally has a premium band less than 86, it then is lapsed. #5 Each time a policyholder is a claimant, it then is not grandfathered. #6 Each time a policyholder is lapsed and additionally is uninsurable, it then has flood coverage. #7 Each time a policyholder is lapsed and additionally is not uninsurable, it then is reinstated. #8 Each time a policyholder is lapsed and additionally is disputed, it then has a deductible waiver. #6 is set aside if a policyholder is subrogated. #1 is set aside if a policyholder is disputed. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Wanda?", "options": ["has flood coverage", "is reinstated", "is covered", "has a deductible waiver", "has roadside assistance"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has flood coverage", "unit_id": "u030407", "pair_id": "u030407-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030407-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "66c425efbda91350", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a3", "a13", "a5", "a8"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030407-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda is a claimant. Wanda is not inspected. Wanda is uninsurable. Wanda is not subrogated. Wanda is not retired. Wanda is not disputed. Wanda has a premium band of 73.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is lapsed and additionally is inspected, it then has roadside assistance. #2 Each time a policyholder is lapsed and additionally has a peril factor less than 32, it then is covered. #3 Each time a policyholder is retired, it then is indemnified. #4 Each time a policyholder is not grandfathered and additionally has a premium band less than 86, it then is lapsed. #5 Each time a policyholder is a claimant, it then is not grandfathered. #6 Each time a policyholder is lapsed and additionally is uninsurable, it then has flood coverage. #7 Each time a policyholder is lapsed and additionally is not uninsurable, it then is reinstated. #8 Each time a policyholder is lapsed and additionally is disputed, it then has a deductible waiver. #6 is set aside if a policyholder is subrogated. #1 is set aside if a policyholder is disputed. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Wanda?", "options": ["has flood coverage", "is reinstated", "is covered", "has a deductible waiver", "has roadside assistance"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has flood coverage", "unit_id": "u030407", "pair_id": "u030407-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030407-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "ab43292945a7fcfe", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a3", "a13", "a5", "a8"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030441-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has no failover node. Nimbus is encrypted. Halcyon has no failover node. Halcyon is cached. Halcyon is encrypted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is cached, thus it is not patched. Provision 2: when the workload here is mirrored, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 3: when the workload here is monitored, thus it is patched. Provision 4: when the workload here has no failover node, thus it is not backed up. Provision 5: when the workload here is containerized, thus it is virtualized. Provision 6: when the workload here is idle, thus it is not containerized. Provision 7: when the workload here is sharded, thus it has no dedicated host. Provision 8: when the workload here is sharded, thus it is idle. Provision 9: when the workload here has a dedicated host, thus it is containerized. Provision 10: when the workload here is encrypted, thus it is not stateless. Provision 11: when the workload here is backed up, thus it is not virtualized. Provision 12: when the workload here is patched, thus it is backed up. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 11. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 12 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Halcyon is not virtualized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030441", "pair_id": "u030441-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030441-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9b14557d6343f3ec", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030441-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus has no failover node. Nimbus is encrypted. Halcyon has no failover node. Halcyon is cached. Halcyon is encrypted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here is cached, thus it is not patched. Provision 2: when the workload here is mirrored, thus it has a dedicated host. Provision 3: when the workload here is monitored, thus it is patched. Provision 4: when the workload here has a failover node, thus it is not backed up. Provision 5: when the workload here is containerized, thus it is virtualized. Provision 6: when the workload here is idle, thus it is not containerized. Provision 7: when the workload here is sharded, thus it has no dedicated host. Provision 8: when the workload here is sharded, thus it is idle. Provision 9: when the workload here has a dedicated host, thus it is containerized. Provision 10: when the workload here is encrypted, thus it is not stateless. Provision 11: when the workload here is backed up, thus it is not virtualized. Provision 12: when the workload here is patched, thus it is backed up. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 11. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 12 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Halcyon is not virtualized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030441", "pair_id": "u030441-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030441-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "79024b58c34a5615", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030461-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon has a dedicated host. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 7. Halcyon is autoscaled.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is autoscaled, then it is backed up. (2) If a workload is backed up, then it is not stateless. (3) If a workload has a memory allotment above 19, then it is sandboxed. (4) If a workload is sandboxed, then it is stateless. Question: Is it true that Halcyon is stateless?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030461", "pair_id": "u030461-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030461-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "ad1fb57e21e60284", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030461-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon has a dedicated host. Halcyon has a memory allotment of 7. Halcyon is autoscaled.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is autoscaled, then it is backed up. (2) If a workload has a dedicated host, then it is monitored. (3) If a workload is backed up, then it is not stateless. (4) If a workload has a memory allotment above 19, then it is sandboxed. (5) If a workload is sandboxed, then it is stateless. Question: Is it true that Halcyon is stateless?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030461", "pair_id": "u030461-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030461-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "a8d03e47fdcf9aca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030499-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not fingerprinted. Ivo is onboarded. Ivo is not recommended. Ivo has no mentor. Ivo is not eligible.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is interviewed and further is fingerprinted, it thereby is not probationary. Point B. If said candidate has a mentor and further is recommended, it thereby is bilingual. Point C. If said candidate is interviewed and further is not fingerprinted and further is eligible, it thereby is probationary. Point D. If said candidate is onboarded, it thereby is interviewed. Point E. If said candidate has a diploma, it thereby is not bilingual. Point F. If said candidate is not interviewed, it thereby has a portfolio. Point G. If said candidate has a diploma, it thereby has no portfolio. Point D is cancelled if said candidate is fingerprinted and further has a diploma. Point B is cancelled if said candidate has a diploma. Point F is cancelled if said candidate is fingerprinted. Point C is cancelled if said candidate has a diploma. Point F supersedes Point G. Point A supersedes Point C. Point B supersedes Point E. Question: Statement: Ivo is probationary. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030499", "pair_id": "u030499-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030499-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bcc08d0c2fc47fb8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 53}}
{"id": "syn-u030499-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ivo is not fingerprinted. Ivo is onboarded. Ivo is not recommended. Ivo has no mentor. Ivo is not eligible.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is interviewed and further is fingerprinted, it thereby is not probationary. Point B. If said candidate has a mentor and further is recommended, it thereby is bilingual. Point C. If said candidate is interviewed and further is not fingerprinted and further is eligible, it thereby is probationary. Point D. If said candidate is onboarded, it thereby is interviewed. Point E. If said candidate has a diploma, it thereby is not bilingual. Point F. If said candidate is interviewed, it thereby has a portfolio. Point G. If said candidate has a diploma, it thereby has no portfolio. Point D is cancelled if said candidate is fingerprinted and further has a diploma. Point B is cancelled if said candidate has a diploma. Point F is cancelled if said candidate is fingerprinted. Point C is cancelled if said candidate has a diploma. Point F supersedes Point G. Point A supersedes Point C. Point B supersedes Point E. Question: Statement: Ivo is probationary. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030499", "pair_id": "u030499-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030499-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b4000162813ae916", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 53}}
{"id": "syn-u030503-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not perishable. Ulla is perishable. Liesel is not refrigerated. Ulla is prepaid. Ulla has a courier. Ulla is misrouted. Liesel is not hazardous. Liesel is sealed. Ulla is hazardous. Ulla is refrigerated. Liesel has no waybill. Liesel is rerouted. Ulla is not rerouted. Ulla is not sealed. Liesel is misrouted. Ulla is not weighed. Ulla has a barcode. Liesel is not palletized.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel has a courier, that parcel is not consolidated. Item B. When the parcel is undeliverable, and has a barcode, and is damaged, that parcel is fragile. Item C. When the parcel is prepaid, that parcel is not oversized. Item D. When the parcel is undeliverable, and is misrouted, and is prepaid, that parcel is not fragile. Item E. When the parcel has a courier, and is prepaid, that parcel is damaged. Item F. When the parcel is scanned, and has a barcode, and is misrouted, that parcel is undeliverable. Item G. When the parcel has a waybill, and is weighed, that parcel is not undeliverable. Item H. When the parcel is hazardous, that parcel is delayed. Item I. When the parcel has a waybill, and has a courier, that parcel is scanned. Item J. When the parcel is prepaid, and is refrigerated, and is hazardous, that parcel is consolidated. Item K. When the parcel is prepaid, and is perishable, and is palletized, that parcel is not delayed. Item L. When the parcel is hazardous, and is sealed, that parcel is oversized. Item E is suspended when the parcel is rerouted. Item K is suspended when the parcel has a locker slot. Item G outranks Item F. Item H outranks Item K. Item A outranks Item J. Item B outranks Item D. Item C outranks Item L. Question: Can one infer that Ulla is fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030503", "pair_id": "u030503-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030503-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cf7bbd028533289e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030503-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not perishable. Ulla has a waybill. Ulla is perishable. Liesel is not refrigerated. Ulla is prepaid. Ulla has a courier. Ulla is misrouted. Liesel is not hazardous. Liesel is sealed. Ulla is hazardous. Ulla is refrigerated. Liesel has no waybill. Liesel is rerouted. Ulla is not rerouted. Ulla is not sealed. Liesel is misrouted. Ulla is not weighed. Ulla has a barcode. Liesel is not palletized.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel has a courier, that parcel is not consolidated. Item B. When the parcel is undeliverable, and has a barcode, and is damaged, that parcel is fragile. Item C. When the parcel is prepaid, that parcel is not oversized. Item D. When the parcel is undeliverable, and is misrouted, and is prepaid, that parcel is not fragile. Item E. When the parcel has a courier, and is prepaid, that parcel is damaged. Item F. When the parcel is scanned, and has a barcode, and is misrouted, that parcel is undeliverable. Item G. When the parcel has a waybill, and is weighed, that parcel is not undeliverable. Item H. When the parcel is hazardous, that parcel is delayed. Item I. When the parcel has a waybill, and has a courier, that parcel is scanned. Item J. When the parcel is prepaid, and is refrigerated, and is hazardous, that parcel is consolidated. Item K. When the parcel is prepaid, and is perishable, and is palletized, that parcel is not delayed. Item L. When the parcel is hazardous, and is sealed, that parcel is oversized. Item E is suspended when the parcel is rerouted. Item K is suspended when the parcel has a locker slot. Item G outranks Item F. Item H outranks Item K. Item A outranks Item J. Item B outranks Item D. Item C outranks Item L. Question: Can one infer that Ulla is fragile?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030503", "pair_id": "u030503-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030503-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "29436d04f1987f7f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030510-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is vetted. Bastien is not underwritten. Folke has a risk tier of 27. Bastien is vetted. Bastien has a risk tier of 8.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is delinquent: then it is refinanced. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy: then it is overdrawn. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is vetted: then it has no lien. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is underwritten: then it is creditworthy. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is underwritten: then it is a depositor. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is overdrawn: then it is not refinanced. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner: then it is delinquent. Question: Is it so that Bastien is refinanced?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030510", "pair_id": "u030510-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030510-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "510e56a325607afe", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030510-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Folke is vetted. Bastien is not underwritten. Folke has a risk tier of 27. Bastien is vetted. Bastien has a risk tier of 8.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is delinquent: then it is refinanced. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy: then it is overdrawn. Policy III. Suppose that borrower has a risk tier smaller than 60: then it is a homeowner. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is vetted: then it has no lien. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is underwritten: then it is creditworthy. Policy VI. Suppose that borrower is underwritten: then it is a depositor. Policy VII. Suppose that borrower is overdrawn: then it is not refinanced. Policy VIII. Suppose that borrower is a homeowner: then it is delinquent. Question: Is it so that Bastien is refinanced?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030510", "pair_id": "u030510-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030510-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "d00a9d7b715984da", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030526-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tomas is delinquent. Tomas is solvent. Ingrid is not creditworthy. Ingrid is a depositor. Ingrid is not pensioned. Tomas is pensioned. Tomas has a guarantor. Ingrid is not refinanced. Tomas is garnished. Tomas is creditworthy. Tomas is employed. Tomas is refinanced.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is a homeowner, it thereby has no escrow account. Point B. If said borrower is foreclosed and further is employed, it thereby is vetted. Point C. If said borrower is vetted and further is pensioned and further is solvent, it thereby has an escrow account. Point D. If said borrower is garnished, it thereby is not foreclosed. Point E. If said borrower is vetted and further is a homeowner and further is refinanced, it thereby has a lien. Point F. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is foreclosed. Point G. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is not overdrawn. Point H. If said borrower is not delinquent, it thereby is not a homeowner. Point I. If said borrower is a depositor and further has a guarantor and further is indebted, it thereby is overdrawn. Point J. If said borrower is delinquent, it thereby is a homeowner. Point H supersedes Point J. Point A supersedes Point C. Point I supersedes Point G. Point F supersedes Point D. Question: Which choice is true for Tomas?", "options": ["has a lien", "has an escrow account"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a lien", "unit_id": "u030526", "pair_id": "u030526-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030526-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "30772e087189ac85", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a10", "a12"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030526-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tomas is delinquent. Tomas is solvent. Ingrid is not creditworthy. Ingrid is a depositor. Ingrid is not pensioned. Tomas is pensioned. Tomas has a guarantor. Ingrid is not refinanced. Tomas is garnished. Tomas is creditworthy. Tomas is employed. Tomas is refinanced.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is a homeowner, it thereby has no escrow account. Point B. If said borrower is foreclosed and further is employed, it thereby is vetted. Point C. If said borrower is vetted and further is pensioned and further is solvent, it thereby has an escrow account. Point D. If said borrower is garnished, it thereby is not foreclosed. Point E. If said borrower is vetted and further is a homeowner and further is refinanced, it thereby has a lien. Point F. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is foreclosed. Point G. If said borrower is creditworthy, it thereby is not overdrawn. Point H. If said borrower is delinquent, it thereby is not a homeowner. Point I. If said borrower is a depositor and further has a guarantor and further is indebted, it thereby is overdrawn. Point J. If said borrower is delinquent, it thereby is a homeowner. Point H supersedes Point J. Point A supersedes Point C. Point I supersedes Point G. Point F supersedes Point D. Question: Which choice is true for Tomas?", "options": ["has a lien", "has an escrow account"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has an escrow account", "unit_id": "u030526", "pair_id": "u030526-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030526-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "652b59a010dcd454", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a10", "a12"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030541-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is renewed. Capella is not resubmitted. Capella has a citation index of 72. Kochab has a team size of 32. Capella has a team size of 16. Capella is preregistered. Kochab is not renewed. Capella is multicenter.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is renewed and also is multicenter and also is not translational, it also is theoretical. Clause 2: once any proposal is not resubmitted, it also is longitudinal. Clause 3: once any proposal has a citation index over 51 and also is not renewed, it also has no steering committee. Clause 4: once any proposal has a citation index over 51 and also is renewed and also has a team size under 75, it also has a steering committee. Clause 3 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is preregistered and also is renewed. Question: Does it follow that Capella has a steering committee?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030541", "pair_id": "u030541-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030541-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "b0b0c6958149371c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u030541-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is renewed. Capella is resubmitted. Capella has a citation index of 72. Kochab has a team size of 32. Capella has a team size of 16. Capella is preregistered. Kochab is not renewed. Capella is multicenter.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is renewed and also is multicenter and also is not translational, it also is theoretical. Clause 2: once any proposal is not resubmitted, it also is longitudinal. Clause 3: once any proposal has a citation index over 51 and also is not renewed, it also has no steering committee. Clause 4: once any proposal has a citation index over 51 and also is renewed and also has a team size under 75, it also has a steering committee. Clause 3 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal is preregistered and also is renewed. Question: Does it follow that Capella has a steering committee?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030541", "pair_id": "u030541-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030541-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c57b56abb6e1286d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u030549-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is sealed. Liesel is oversized. Ulla is rerouted. Odile is undeliverable. Liesel is not damaged. Odile is not damaged. Ulla is not damaged. Odile is delayed. Ulla is not fragile. Odile has a locker slot. Ulla is undeliverable. Odile is sealed. Liesel is not delayed. Ulla is oversized. Ulla is not delayed. Liesel is not rerouted. Liesel is undeliverable. Liesel is fragile.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is tracked provided that it is scanned as well as is rerouted as well as is sealed. Section 2: a parcel is hazardous provided that it is fragile as well as is damaged. Section 3: a parcel is labeled provided that it is delayed as well as is rerouted. Section 4: a parcel has no barcode provided that it is undeliverable as well as is delayed. Section 5: a parcel is scanned provided that it is consolidated as well as is sealed as well as is fragile. Section 6: a parcel has a barcode provided that it has a locker slot. Section 7: a parcel is not tracked provided that it is scanned as well as is not rerouted as well as is oversized. Section 8: a parcel is not scanned provided that it is hazardous as well as has a courier. Section 9: a parcel is consolidated provided that it is fragile as well as is sealed. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it is fragile. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it has a courier as well as is fragile. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 7. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Liesel is not tracked. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030549", "pair_id": "u030549-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030549-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c09a4078f523fc03", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u030549-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is sealed. Liesel is oversized. Ulla is rerouted. Odile is undeliverable. Liesel is not damaged. Odile is not damaged. Ulla is not damaged. Odile is delayed. Ulla is not fragile. Odile has a locker slot. Ulla is undeliverable. Odile is sealed. Liesel is not delayed. Ulla is oversized. Ulla is not delayed. Liesel is not rerouted. Liesel is undeliverable. Liesel is fragile.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is tracked provided that it is scanned as well as is rerouted as well as is sealed. Section 2: a parcel is hazardous provided that it is fragile as well as is damaged. Section 3: a parcel is labeled provided that it is delayed as well as is rerouted. Section 4: a parcel has no barcode provided that it is undeliverable as well as is delayed. Section 5: a parcel is scanned provided that it is consolidated as well as is sealed as well as is fragile. Section 6: a parcel has a barcode provided that it has a locker slot. Section 7: a parcel is not tracked provided that it is scanned as well as is rerouted as well as is oversized. Section 8: a parcel is not scanned provided that it is hazardous as well as has a courier. Section 9: a parcel is consolidated provided that it is fragile as well as is sealed. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it is fragile. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it has a courier as well as is fragile. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 8. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 7. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Liesel is not tracked. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030549", "pair_id": "u030549-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030549-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fa1cb28ffdac92a7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u030549-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is sealed. Liesel is oversized. Ulla is rerouted. Odile is undeliverable. Liesel is not damaged. Odile is not damaged. Ulla is not damaged. Odile is delayed. Ulla is not fragile. Odile has a locker slot. Ulla is undeliverable. Odile is sealed. Liesel is not delayed. Ulla is oversized. Ulla is not delayed. Liesel is not rerouted. Liesel is undeliverable. Liesel is fragile.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is scanned and additionally is rerouted and additionally is sealed, it then is tracked. #2 Each time a parcel is fragile and additionally is damaged, it then is hazardous. #3 Each time a parcel is delayed and additionally is rerouted, it then is labeled. #4 Each time a parcel is undeliverable and additionally is delayed, it then has no barcode. #5 Each time a parcel is consolidated and additionally is sealed and additionally is fragile, it then is scanned. #6 Each time a parcel has a locker slot, it then has a barcode. #7 Each time a parcel is scanned and additionally is not rerouted and additionally is oversized, it then is not tracked. #8 Each time a parcel is hazardous and additionally has a courier, it then is not scanned. #9 Each time a parcel is fragile and additionally is sealed, it then is consolidated. #3 is set aside if a parcel is fragile. #1 is set aside if a parcel has a courier and additionally is fragile. #8 yields to #5. #7 yields to #1. #4 yields to #6. Question: Do the terms above show that Liesel is not tracked?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030549", "pair_id": "u030549-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030549-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c09a4078f523fc03", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u030549-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is sealed. Liesel is oversized. Ulla is rerouted. Odile is undeliverable. Liesel is not damaged. Odile is not damaged. Ulla is not damaged. Odile is delayed. Ulla is not fragile. Odile has a locker slot. Ulla is undeliverable. Odile is sealed. Liesel is not delayed. Ulla is oversized. Ulla is not delayed. Liesel is not rerouted. Liesel is undeliverable. Liesel is fragile.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is scanned and additionally is rerouted and additionally is sealed, it then is tracked. #2 Each time a parcel is fragile and additionally is damaged, it then is hazardous. #3 Each time a parcel is delayed and additionally is rerouted, it then is labeled. #4 Each time a parcel is undeliverable and additionally is delayed, it then has no barcode. #5 Each time a parcel is consolidated and additionally is sealed and additionally is fragile, it then is scanned. #6 Each time a parcel has a locker slot, it then has a barcode. #7 Each time a parcel is scanned and additionally is rerouted and additionally is oversized, it then is not tracked. #8 Each time a parcel is hazardous and additionally has a courier, it then is not scanned. #9 Each time a parcel is fragile and additionally is sealed, it then is consolidated. #3 is set aside if a parcel is fragile. #1 is set aside if a parcel has a courier and additionally is fragile. #8 yields to #5. #7 yields to #1. #4 yields to #6. Question: Do the terms above show that Liesel is not tracked?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030549", "pair_id": "u030549-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/6/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030549-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fa1cb28ffdac92a7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u030551-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab has a postdoc. Kochab is not shortlisted. Kochab is not exploratory. Kochab has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is not exploratory plus has ethics clearance: then it is a pilot study. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is embargoed: then it is resubmitted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has ethics clearance plus has a postdoc plus is shortlisted: then it is peer reviewed. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee: then it is preregistered. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has ethics clearance plus is embargoed: then it is not peer reviewed. Question: Is it so that Kochab is peer reviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030551", "pair_id": "u030551-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030551-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "d4167d3810d778d9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u030551-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab has a postdoc. Kochab is not shortlisted. Kochab is not exploratory. Kochab has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is exploratory plus has ethics clearance: then it is a pilot study. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is embargoed: then it is resubmitted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has ethics clearance plus has a postdoc plus is shortlisted: then it is peer reviewed. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee: then it is preregistered. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has ethics clearance plus is embargoed: then it is not peer reviewed. Question: Is it so that Kochab is peer reviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030551", "pair_id": "u030551-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030551-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "3ea073f112fe18d4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u030551-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab has a postdoc. Kochab is not shortlisted. Kochab is not exploratory. Kochab has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is not exploratory and additionally has ethics clearance, it then is a pilot study. #2 Each time a proposal is embargoed, it then is resubmitted. #3 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally has a postdoc and additionally is shortlisted, it then is peer reviewed. #4 Each time a proposal has a steering committee, it then is preregistered. #5 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally is embargoed, it then is not peer reviewed. Question: Do the terms above show that Kochab is peer reviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030551", "pair_id": "u030551-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030551-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "d4167d3810d778d9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u030551-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab has a postdoc. Kochab is not shortlisted. Kochab is not exploratory. Kochab has ethics clearance.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is exploratory and additionally has ethics clearance, it then is a pilot study. #2 Each time a proposal is embargoed, it then is resubmitted. #3 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally has a postdoc and additionally is shortlisted, it then is peer reviewed. #4 Each time a proposal has a steering committee, it then is preregistered. #5 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance and additionally is embargoed, it then is not peer reviewed. Question: Do the terms above show that Kochab is peer reviewed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030551", "pair_id": "u030551-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030551-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "3ea073f112fe18d4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 15}}
{"id": "syn-u030564-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hamid has a credit rating of 81. Ingrid is not garnished. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 68. Ingrid is not prequalified. Ingrid is not a depositor.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy: then it has a guarantor. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is prequalified: then it is not underwritten. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is garnished: then it is not amortized. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a credit rating smaller than 86: then it is employed. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is not garnished: then it is amortized. Policy V is waived if that borrower has a credit rating smaller than 72. Policy I is waived if that borrower is a depositor. Policy III is waived if that borrower has a credit rating no lower than 72. Policy III is waived if that borrower has a debt ratio no higher than 13. Policy V is waived if that borrower is a depositor. Policy IV is waived if that borrower has a credit rating smaller than 68. Question: Is it so that Ingrid is amortized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030564", "pair_id": "u030564-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030564-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "182f2e60aa6250f6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030564-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hamid has a credit rating of 81. Ingrid is not garnished. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 68. Ingrid is not prequalified. Ingrid is not a depositor.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy: then it has a guarantor. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is prequalified: then it is not underwritten. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is garnished: then it is not amortized. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a credit rating smaller than 86: then it is employed. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is garnished: then it is amortized. Policy V is waived if that borrower has a credit rating smaller than 72. Policy I is waived if that borrower is a depositor. Policy III is waived if that borrower has a credit rating no lower than 72. Policy III is waived if that borrower has a debt ratio no higher than 13. Policy V is waived if that borrower is a depositor. Policy IV is waived if that borrower has a credit rating smaller than 68. Question: Is it so that Ingrid is amortized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030564", "pair_id": "u030564-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030564-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8ca62768e61c6820", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030730-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel is fasting. Wendel has a pulse rate of 12. Wendel is referred. Florin is not referred. Wendel has a fever reading of 39. Florin has a pulse rate of 99. Florin is fasting.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is diabetic and has a pulse rate above 22, then it is discharged. (2) If a patient is referred, then it has no chaperone. (3) If a patient is sedated, then it is diabetic. (4) If a patient is diabetic and has a pulse rate of at most 22, then it is not discharged. (3) is void if the patient has a fever reading of at least 54. When (4) and (1) clash, (4) prevails. Question: Is it true that Wendel is not discharged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030730", "pair_id": "u030730-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030730-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f66f9543fba8b7db", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030730-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel is fasting. Wendel has a pulse rate of 12. Wendel is referred. Florin is not referred. Wendel has a fever reading of 39. Florin has a pulse rate of 99. Florin is fasting.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is diabetic and has a pulse rate above 22, then it is discharged. (2) If a patient is referred, then it has no chaperone. (3) If a patient is sedated, then it is diabetic. (4) If a patient is fasting, then it is sedated. (5) If a patient is diabetic and has a pulse rate of at most 22, then it is not discharged. (3) is void if the patient has a fever reading of at least 54. When (5) and (1) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Wendel is not discharged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030730", "pair_id": "u030730-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030730-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4a83ff82c3f4eced", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030730-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel is fasting. Wendel has a pulse rate of 12. Wendel is referred. Florin is not referred. Wendel has a fever reading of 39. Florin has a pulse rate of 99. Florin is fasting.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is diabetic and also has a pulse rate over 22, it also is discharged. Clause 2: once any patient is referred, it also has no chaperone. Clause 3: once any patient is sedated, it also is diabetic. Clause 4: once any patient is diabetic and also has a pulse rate of 22 or less, it also is not discharged. Clause 3 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a fever reading of 54 or more. Clause 4 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Wendel is not discharged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030730", "pair_id": "u030730-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030730-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f66f9543fba8b7db", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030730-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel is fasting. Wendel has a pulse rate of 12. Wendel is referred. Florin is not referred. Wendel has a fever reading of 39. Florin has a pulse rate of 99. Florin is fasting.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is diabetic and also has a pulse rate over 22, it also is discharged. Clause 2: once any patient is referred, it also has no chaperone. Clause 3: once any patient is sedated, it also is diabetic. Clause 4: once any patient is fasting, it also is sedated. Clause 5: once any patient is diabetic and also has a pulse rate of 22 or less, it also is not discharged. Clause 3 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a fever reading of 54 or more. Clause 5 overrides Clause 1. Question: Does it follow that Wendel is not discharged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030730", "pair_id": "u030730-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030730-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4a83ff82c3f4eced", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030757-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab has a review mark of 41. Kochab has a milestone total of 42. Kochab is not endorsed. Kochab is theoretical. Kochab has a field site. Kochab has a team size of 76.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a review mark not below 72, so it is translational. No. 2 While the given proposal is not theoretical, so it is not embargoed. No. 3 While the given proposal has a milestone total not above 43, so it is collaborative. No. 4 While the given proposal has no steering committee, so it is not longitudinal. No. 5 While the given proposal has a milestone total not above 43, so it is not collaborative. No. 6 While the given proposal has a team size that exceeds 38, so it is longitudinal. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given proposal has no field site. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a field site. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a team size not below 62. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a team size that falls below 62. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a team size not below 82. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given proposal is endorsed. No. 3 wins over No. 5. No. 4 wins over No. 6. Question: Is the claim \"Kochab is not collaborative\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030757", "pair_id": "u030757-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030757-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fd7325c1b98234d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030757-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kochab has a review mark of 41. Kochab has a milestone total of 58. Kochab is not endorsed. Kochab is theoretical. Kochab has a field site. Kochab has a team size of 76.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a review mark not below 72, so it is translational. No. 2 While the given proposal is not theoretical, so it is not embargoed. No. 3 While the given proposal has a milestone total not above 43, so it is collaborative. No. 4 While the given proposal has no steering committee, so it is not longitudinal. No. 5 While the given proposal has a milestone total not above 43, so it is not collaborative. No. 6 While the given proposal has a team size that exceeds 38, so it is longitudinal. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given proposal has no field site. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a field site. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a team size not below 62. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a team size that falls below 62. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given proposal has a team size not below 82. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given proposal is endorsed. No. 3 wins over No. 5. No. 4 wins over No. 6. Question: Is the claim \"Kochab is not collaborative\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030757", "pair_id": "u030757-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030757-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ae9450a8e46a925f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030776-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dorian is asthmatic. Dorian has no caregiver. Dorian is not fasting. Dorian has a pacemaker. Dorian is not symptomatic. Xenia is asthmatic. Xenia is discharged. Xenia has no caregiver. Xenia is hypertensive. Dorian is hypertensive. Xenia is pregnant. Dorian is pregnant. Dorian is not discharged. Xenia is symptomatic. Dorian is triaged. Dorian is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is sedated and also is triaged, it also is rescheduled. Clause 2: once any patient is pregnant and also has a pacemaker, it also is referred. Clause 3: once any patient is sedated and also is hypertensive and also is discharged, it also is diabetic. Clause 4: once any patient is discharged and also is postoperative, it also is anemic. Clause 5: once any patient is sedated and also is asthmatic and also is hypertensive, it also is allergic. Clause 6: once any patient is discharged, it also is waitlisted. Clause 7: once any patient is symptomatic and also is hypertensive, it also is admitted. Clause 8: once any patient is referred and also is pregnant and also has a pacemaker, it also is sedated. Clause 9: once any patient is symptomatic, it also is vaccinated. Clause 10: once any patient is sedated and also is ambulatory, it also is contagious. Clause 11: once any patient is sedated and also has a caregiver, it also has a chaperone. Clause 12: once any patient is sedated and also is fasting and also is waitlisted, it also has an interpreter. Clause 1 does not hold for a patient when any patient is asthmatic. Clause 12 does not hold for a patient when any patient is hypertensive. Clause 11 does not hold for a patient when any patient is ambulatory. Question: Which of these is true of Dorian?", "options": ["is contagious", "is diabetic", "has an interpreter", "is allergic", "is rescheduled", "has a chaperone"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is allergic", "unit_id": "u030776", "pair_id": "u030776-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030776-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "64bc143c3e250f97", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a22", "a0", "a17", "a7", "a16"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u030776-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dorian is not asthmatic. Dorian has no caregiver. Dorian is not fasting. Dorian has a pacemaker. Dorian is not symptomatic. Xenia is asthmatic. Xenia is discharged. Xenia has no caregiver. Xenia is hypertensive. Dorian is hypertensive. Xenia is pregnant. Dorian is pregnant. Dorian is not discharged. Xenia is symptomatic. Dorian is triaged. Dorian is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient is sedated and also is triaged, it also is rescheduled. Clause 2: once any patient is pregnant and also has a pacemaker, it also is referred. Clause 3: once any patient is sedated and also is hypertensive and also is discharged, it also is diabetic. Clause 4: once any patient is discharged and also is postoperative, it also is anemic. Clause 5: once any patient is sedated and also is asthmatic and also is hypertensive, it also is allergic. Clause 6: once any patient is discharged, it also is waitlisted. Clause 7: once any patient is symptomatic and also is hypertensive, it also is admitted. Clause 8: once any patient is referred and also is pregnant and also has a pacemaker, it also is sedated. Clause 9: once any patient is symptomatic, it also is vaccinated. Clause 10: once any patient is sedated and also is ambulatory, it also is contagious. Clause 11: once any patient is sedated and also has a caregiver, it also has a chaperone. Clause 12: once any patient is sedated and also is fasting and also is waitlisted, it also has an interpreter. Clause 1 does not hold for a patient when any patient is asthmatic. Clause 12 does not hold for a patient when any patient is hypertensive. Clause 11 does not hold for a patient when any patient is ambulatory. Question: Which of these is true of Dorian?", "options": ["is contagious", "is diabetic", "has an interpreter", "is allergic", "is rescheduled", "has a chaperone"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is rescheduled", "unit_id": "u030776", "pair_id": "u030776-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030776-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "240210187d8eabe1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a22", "a0", "a17", "a7", "a16"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u030776-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dorian is asthmatic. Dorian has no caregiver. Dorian is not fasting. Dorian has a pacemaker. Dorian is not symptomatic. Xenia is asthmatic. Xenia is discharged. Xenia has no caregiver. Xenia is hypertensive. Dorian is hypertensive. Xenia is pregnant. Dorian is pregnant. Dorian is not discharged. Xenia is symptomatic. Dorian is triaged. Dorian is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is sedated, and is triaged, that patient is rescheduled. Item B. When the patient is pregnant, and has a pacemaker, that patient is referred. Item C. When the patient is sedated, and is hypertensive, and is discharged, that patient is diabetic. Item D. When the patient is discharged, and is postoperative, that patient is anemic. Item E. When the patient is sedated, and is asthmatic, and is hypertensive, that patient is allergic. Item F. When the patient is discharged, that patient is waitlisted. Item G. When the patient is symptomatic, and is hypertensive, that patient is admitted. Item H. When the patient is referred, and is pregnant, and has a pacemaker, that patient is sedated. Item I. When the patient is symptomatic, that patient is vaccinated. Item J. When the patient is sedated, and is ambulatory, that patient is contagious. Item K. When the patient is sedated, and has a caregiver, that patient has a chaperone. Item L. When the patient is sedated, and is fasting, and is waitlisted, that patient has an interpreter. Item A is suspended when the patient is asthmatic. Item L is suspended when the patient is hypertensive. Item K is suspended when the patient is ambulatory. Question: What applies to Dorian?", "options": ["is contagious", "is diabetic", "has an interpreter", "is allergic", "is rescheduled", "has a chaperone"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is allergic", "unit_id": "u030776", "pair_id": "u030776-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030776-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "64bc143c3e250f97", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a22", "a0", "a17", "a7", "a16"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u030776-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Dorian is not asthmatic. Dorian has no caregiver. Dorian is not fasting. Dorian has a pacemaker. Dorian is not symptomatic. Xenia is asthmatic. Xenia is discharged. Xenia has no caregiver. Xenia is hypertensive. Dorian is hypertensive. Xenia is pregnant. Dorian is pregnant. Dorian is not discharged. Xenia is symptomatic. Dorian is triaged. Dorian is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is sedated, and is triaged, that patient is rescheduled. Item B. When the patient is pregnant, and has a pacemaker, that patient is referred. Item C. When the patient is sedated, and is hypertensive, and is discharged, that patient is diabetic. Item D. When the patient is discharged, and is postoperative, that patient is anemic. Item E. When the patient is sedated, and is asthmatic, and is hypertensive, that patient is allergic. Item F. When the patient is discharged, that patient is waitlisted. Item G. When the patient is symptomatic, and is hypertensive, that patient is admitted. Item H. When the patient is referred, and is pregnant, and has a pacemaker, that patient is sedated. Item I. When the patient is symptomatic, that patient is vaccinated. Item J. When the patient is sedated, and is ambulatory, that patient is contagious. Item K. When the patient is sedated, and has a caregiver, that patient has a chaperone. Item L. When the patient is sedated, and is fasting, and is waitlisted, that patient has an interpreter. Item A is suspended when the patient is asthmatic. Item L is suspended when the patient is hypertensive. Item K is suspended when the patient is ambulatory. Question: What applies to Dorian?", "options": ["is contagious", "is diabetic", "has an interpreter", "is allergic", "is rescheduled", "has a chaperone"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is rescheduled", "unit_id": "u030776", "pair_id": "u030776-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030776-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "240210187d8eabe1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a22", "a0", "a17", "a7", "a16"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u030797-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a replica count of 3. Zephyr is throttled. Zephyr has no dedicated host. Zephyr has a latency budget of 62. Tundra has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is replicated and additionally has a replica count greater than 57 and additionally is not encrypted, it then is not containerized. #2 Each time a workload has a latency budget greater than 53 and additionally is throttled, it then is not encrypted. #3 Each time a workload is replicated and additionally has a replica count of 57 or below and additionally has a latency budget less than 63, it then is containerized. #4 Each time a workload has a latency budget less than 81, it then is replicated. #5 Each time a workload has no dedicated host, it then is cached. Question: Do the terms above show that Zephyr is not containerized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030797", "pair_id": "u030797-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030797-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "aa193b56cf98b860", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 40}}
{"id": "syn-u030797-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zephyr has a replica count of 3. Zephyr is throttled. Zephyr has no dedicated host. Zephyr has a latency budget of 95. Tundra has a dedicated host.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is replicated and additionally has a replica count greater than 57 and additionally is not encrypted, it then is not containerized. #2 Each time a workload has a latency budget greater than 53 and additionally is throttled, it then is not encrypted. #3 Each time a workload is replicated and additionally has a replica count of 57 or below and additionally has a latency budget less than 63, it then is containerized. #4 Each time a workload has a latency budget less than 81, it then is replicated. #5 Each time a workload has no dedicated host, it then is cached. Question: Do the terms above show that Zephyr is not containerized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030797", "pair_id": "u030797-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030797-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e0492b53e27df72e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 40}}
{"id": "syn-u030802-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is disputed. Wanda has no dashcam. Zdenek is lapsed. Wanda is lapsed. Zdenek has a dashcam.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is not lapsed, so it is inspected. No. 2 While the given policyholder has no dashcam, so it is a smoker. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not disputed, so it is not inspected. No. 4 While the given policyholder has no dashcam, so it is a claimant. Question: Is the claim \"Wanda is inspected\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030802", "pair_id": "u030802-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030802-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "a912b9a646e37a6b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030802-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is disputed. Wanda has no dashcam. Zdenek is lapsed. Wanda is lapsed. Zdenek has a dashcam.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is not lapsed, so it is inspected. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is a smoker. No. 3 While the given policyholder is not disputed, so it is not inspected. No. 4 While the given policyholder has no dashcam, so it is a claimant. Question: Is the claim \"Wanda is inspected\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030802", "pair_id": "u030802-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030802-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "4fd80baa8641b8c6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030826-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has no snapshot. Borealis is virtualized. Tundra is provisioned. Zephyr has a snapshot. Zephyr is virtualized. Zephyr is stateless. Orrery is stateless. Zephyr is provisioned. Tundra is stateless.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is deprecated: then it is cached. Policy II. Suppose that workload is idle: then it is isolated. Policy III. Suppose that workload is not autoscaled: then it has a GPU. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is sharded: then it is deprecated. Policy V. Suppose that workload has a GPU: then it is patched. Policy VI. Suppose that workload is not stateless: then it is not autoscaled. Policy VII. Suppose that workload is virtualized: then it has a public endpoint. Policy VIII. Suppose that workload has a firewall: then it is idle. Policy IX. Suppose that workload is not provisioned: then it is sharded. Policy X. Suppose that workload has no snapshot: then it has a dedicated host. Policy XI. Suppose that workload is stateless: then it has a firewall. Question: Which choice is right for Zephyr?", "options": ["is isolated", "is patched", "is cached"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is isolated", "unit_id": "u030826", "pair_id": "u030826-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030826-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "d799b50ef44de16e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030826-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has no snapshot. Borealis is virtualized. Tundra is provisioned. Zephyr has no snapshot. Zephyr is virtualized. Zephyr is stateless. Orrery is stateless. Zephyr is provisioned. Tundra is stateless.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is deprecated: then it is cached. Policy II. Suppose that workload is idle: then it is isolated. Policy III. Suppose that workload is not autoscaled: then it has a GPU. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is sharded: then it is deprecated. Policy V. Suppose that workload has a GPU: then it is patched. Policy VI. Suppose that workload is not stateless: then it is not autoscaled. Policy VII. Suppose that workload is virtualized: then it has a public endpoint. Policy VIII. Suppose that workload has a firewall: then it is idle. Policy IX. Suppose that workload is not provisioned: then it is sharded. Policy X. Suppose that workload has no snapshot: then it has a dedicated host. Policy XI. Suppose that workload is stateless: then it has a firewall. Question: Which choice is right for Zephyr?", "options": ["is isolated", "is patched", "is cached"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is isolated", "unit_id": "u030826", "pair_id": "u030826-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030826-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "28a24824f534f775", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030826-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has no snapshot. Borealis is virtualized. Tundra is provisioned. Zephyr has a snapshot. Zephyr is virtualized. Zephyr is stateless. Orrery is stateless. Zephyr is provisioned. Tundra is stateless.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is deprecated, it then is cached. #2 Each time a workload is idle, it then is isolated. #3 Each time a workload is not autoscaled, it then has a GPU. #4 Each time a workload is sharded, it then is deprecated. #5 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is patched. #6 Each time a workload is not stateless, it then is not autoscaled. #7 Each time a workload is virtualized, it then has a public endpoint. #8 Each time a workload has a firewall, it then is idle. #9 Each time a workload is not provisioned, it then is sharded. #10 Each time a workload has no snapshot, it then has a dedicated host. #11 Each time a workload is stateless, it then has a firewall. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Zephyr?", "options": ["is isolated", "is patched", "is cached"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is isolated", "unit_id": "u030826", "pair_id": "u030826-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030826-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "d799b50ef44de16e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030826-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has no snapshot. Borealis is virtualized. Tundra is provisioned. Zephyr has no snapshot. Zephyr is virtualized. Zephyr is stateless. Orrery is stateless. Zephyr is provisioned. Tundra is stateless.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is deprecated, it then is cached. #2 Each time a workload is idle, it then is isolated. #3 Each time a workload is not autoscaled, it then has a GPU. #4 Each time a workload is sharded, it then is deprecated. #5 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is patched. #6 Each time a workload is not stateless, it then is not autoscaled. #7 Each time a workload is virtualized, it then has a public endpoint. #8 Each time a workload has a firewall, it then is idle. #9 Each time a workload is not provisioned, it then is sharded. #10 Each time a workload has no snapshot, it then has a dedicated host. #11 Each time a workload is stateless, it then has a firewall. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Zephyr?", "options": ["is isolated", "is patched", "is cached"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is isolated", "unit_id": "u030826", "pair_id": "u030826-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030826-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "28a24824f534f775", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030835-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wiebke has a credit rating of 1. Anouk has a repayment grade of 27. Wiebke is overdrawn. Anouk is garnished. Corin has collateral. Anouk is not creditworthy. Anouk is not delinquent. Anouk is not overdrawn. Bastien is a depositor. Bastien has an escrow account. Anouk has a risk tier of 70. Anouk has collateral. Wiebke has no escrow account. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk is not a depositor. Corin is delinquent.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is foreclosed while is overdrawn while is a depositor, thus it is bankrupt. Provision 2: when the borrower here is foreclosed while has an escrow account, thus it is a homeowner. Provision 3: when the borrower here has an escrow account, thus it is not audited. Provision 4: when the borrower here is foreclosed while has a credit rating beyond 17, thus it is indebted. Provision 5: when the borrower here is delinquent, thus it is vetted. Provision 6: when the borrower here has collateral, thus it is underwritten. Provision 7: when the borrower here is foreclosed while is creditworthy while has a risk tier at or below 30, thus it is amortized. Provision 8: when the borrower here is underwritten while has a repayment grade at or below 64, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 9: when the borrower here is foreclosed while is garnished while is creditworthy, thus it is audited. Provision 2 has no effect when the borrower here is creditworthy. Provision 4 has no effect when the borrower here is garnished. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Which one describes Anouk?", "options": ["is indebted", "is audited", "is amortized", "is bankrupt", "is a homeowner"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is a homeowner", "unit_id": "u030835", "pair_id": "u030835-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030835-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9a3ae81a8dbcfdd2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a15", "a10", "a13", "a11", "a17"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030835-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wiebke has a credit rating of 1. Anouk has a repayment grade of 27. Wiebke is overdrawn. Anouk is garnished. Corin has collateral. Anouk is creditworthy. Anouk is not delinquent. Anouk is not overdrawn. Bastien is a depositor. Bastien has an escrow account. Anouk has a risk tier of 70. Anouk has collateral. Wiebke has no escrow account. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk is not a depositor. Corin is delinquent.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is foreclosed while is overdrawn while is a depositor, thus it is bankrupt. Provision 2: when the borrower here is foreclosed while has an escrow account, thus it is a homeowner. Provision 3: when the borrower here has an escrow account, thus it is not audited. Provision 4: when the borrower here is foreclosed while has a credit rating beyond 17, thus it is indebted. Provision 5: when the borrower here is delinquent, thus it is vetted. Provision 6: when the borrower here has collateral, thus it is underwritten. Provision 7: when the borrower here is foreclosed while is creditworthy while has a risk tier at or below 30, thus it is amortized. Provision 8: when the borrower here is underwritten while has a repayment grade at or below 64, thus it is foreclosed. Provision 9: when the borrower here is foreclosed while is garnished while is creditworthy, thus it is audited. Provision 2 has no effect when the borrower here is creditworthy. Provision 4 has no effect when the borrower here is garnished. Provision 9 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Which one describes Anouk?", "options": ["is indebted", "is audited", "is amortized", "is bankrupt", "is a homeowner"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is audited", "unit_id": "u030835", "pair_id": "u030835-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030835-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3d6bb5a19d551c42", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a15", "a10", "a13", "a11", "a17"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030868-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid is not interviewed. Sigrid is freelance.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is not freelance: then it has a diploma. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a background screening: then it is not eligible. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is not eligible: then it is not a graduate. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is not eligible: then it is a graduate. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is onboarded: then it has a background screening. Policy IV is waived if that candidate is interviewed. Policy II is waived if that candidate is a veteran. Policy I is waived if that candidate is headhunted. Policy III is waived if that candidate is not interviewed. Question: Is it so that Sigrid is a graduate?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030868", "pair_id": "u030868-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030868-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "634763781b08e8d4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u030868-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid is onboarded. Sigrid is not interviewed. Sigrid is freelance.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is not freelance: then it has a diploma. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a background screening: then it is not eligible. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is not eligible: then it is not a graduate. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is not eligible: then it is a graduate. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is onboarded: then it has a background screening. Policy IV is waived if that candidate is interviewed. Policy II is waived if that candidate is a veteran. Policy I is waived if that candidate is headhunted. Policy III is waived if that candidate is not interviewed. Question: Is it so that Sigrid is a graduate?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030868", "pair_id": "u030868-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030868-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "000f07edf1a48125", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u030878-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo has no barcode. Ulla has a barcode. Saskia has a barcode. Ulla is consolidated. Ulla is not prepaid. Thilo is not refrigerated. Ulla is refrigerated. Saskia is not consolidated. Saskia is not refrigerated. Thilo is tracked. Saskia is not tracked. Thilo is delayed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is palletized provided that it is not tracked. Section 2: a parcel is not palletized provided that it is tracked. Section 3: a parcel is scanned provided that it is not delayed. Section 4: a parcel is rerouted provided that it is damaged. Section 5: a parcel is oversized provided that it is delayed. Section 6: a parcel is not damaged provided that it is delayed. Section 7: a parcel is not labeled provided that it is not prepaid. Section 8: a parcel is not oversized provided that it is consolidated. Section 9: a parcel is not rerouted provided that it is damaged. Section 10: a parcel is not scanned provided that it has a barcode. Section 11: a parcel is damaged provided that it is not palletized. Section 9 lapses for a parcel if it is not refrigerated. Section 9 lapses for a parcel if it is consolidated. Section 8 lapses for a parcel if it is delayed. Section 4 lapses for a parcel if it is not consolidated. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 11 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 8. Question: Thilo is rerouted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030878", "pair_id": "u030878-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030878-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0b27c9107df801f0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030878-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo has no barcode. Ulla has a barcode. Saskia has a barcode. Ulla is consolidated. Ulla is not prepaid. Thilo is not refrigerated. Ulla is refrigerated. Saskia is not consolidated. Saskia is not refrigerated. Thilo is tracked. Saskia is not tracked. Thilo is delayed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is palletized provided that it is not tracked. Section 2: a parcel is not palletized provided that it is tracked. Section 3: a parcel is scanned provided that it is not delayed. Section 4: a parcel is rerouted provided that it is damaged. Section 5: a parcel is oversized provided that it is not delayed. Section 6: a parcel is not damaged provided that it is delayed. Section 7: a parcel is not labeled provided that it is not prepaid. Section 8: a parcel is not oversized provided that it is consolidated. Section 9: a parcel is not rerouted provided that it is damaged. Section 10: a parcel is not scanned provided that it has a barcode. Section 11: a parcel is damaged provided that it is not palletized. Section 9 lapses for a parcel if it is not refrigerated. Section 9 lapses for a parcel if it is consolidated. Section 8 lapses for a parcel if it is delayed. Section 4 lapses for a parcel if it is not consolidated. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 10 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 11 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 8. Question: Thilo is rerouted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030878", "pair_id": "u030878-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030878-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ffd2b3a3050cdbe8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030878-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo has no barcode. Ulla has a barcode. Saskia has a barcode. Ulla is consolidated. Ulla is not prepaid. Thilo is not refrigerated. Ulla is refrigerated. Saskia is not consolidated. Saskia is not refrigerated. Thilo is tracked. Saskia is not tracked. Thilo is delayed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not tracked: then it is palletized. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is not palletized. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is not delayed: then it is scanned. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is damaged: then it is rerouted. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it is oversized. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it is not damaged. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is not prepaid: then it is not labeled. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is consolidated: then it is not oversized. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is damaged: then it is not rerouted. Policy X. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is not scanned. Policy XI. Suppose that parcel is not palletized: then it is damaged. Policy IX is waived if that parcel is not refrigerated. Policy IX is waived if that parcel is consolidated. Policy VIII is waived if that parcel is delayed. Policy IV is waived if that parcel is not consolidated. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy XI beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy VIII. Question: Is it so that Thilo is rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030878", "pair_id": "u030878-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030878-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0b27c9107df801f0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030878-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo has no barcode. Ulla has a barcode. Saskia has a barcode. Ulla is consolidated. Ulla is not prepaid. Thilo is not refrigerated. Ulla is refrigerated. Saskia is not consolidated. Saskia is not refrigerated. Thilo is tracked. Saskia is not tracked. Thilo is delayed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not tracked: then it is palletized. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is tracked: then it is not palletized. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is not delayed: then it is scanned. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is damaged: then it is rerouted. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is not delayed: then it is oversized. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it is not damaged. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is not prepaid: then it is not labeled. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is consolidated: then it is not oversized. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is damaged: then it is not rerouted. Policy X. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is not scanned. Policy XI. Suppose that parcel is not palletized: then it is damaged. Policy IX is waived if that parcel is not refrigerated. Policy IX is waived if that parcel is consolidated. Policy VIII is waived if that parcel is delayed. Policy IV is waived if that parcel is not consolidated. In a clash, Policy IX beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy III. In a clash, Policy XI beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy VIII. Question: Is it so that Thilo is rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030878", "pair_id": "u030878-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030878-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ffd2b3a3050cdbe8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030878-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo has no barcode. Ulla has a barcode. Saskia has a barcode. Ulla is consolidated. Ulla is not prepaid. Thilo is not refrigerated. Ulla is refrigerated. Saskia is not consolidated. Saskia is not refrigerated. Thilo is tracked. Saskia is not tracked. Thilo is delayed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is not tracked, it then is palletized. #2 Each time a parcel is tracked, it then is not palletized. #3 Each time a parcel is not delayed, it then is scanned. #4 Each time a parcel is damaged, it then is rerouted. #5 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then is oversized. #6 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then is not damaged. #7 Each time a parcel is not prepaid, it then is not labeled. #8 Each time a parcel is consolidated, it then is not oversized. #9 Each time a parcel is damaged, it then is not rerouted. #10 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is not scanned. #11 Each time a parcel is not palletized, it then is damaged. #9 is set aside if a parcel is not refrigerated. #9 is set aside if a parcel is consolidated. #8 is set aside if a parcel is delayed. #4 is set aside if a parcel is not consolidated. #4 yields to #9. #3 yields to #10. #6 yields to #11. #2 yields to #1. #8 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Thilo is rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030878", "pair_id": "u030878-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030878-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0b27c9107df801f0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030878-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Thilo has no barcode. Ulla has a barcode. Saskia has a barcode. Ulla is consolidated. Ulla is not prepaid. Thilo is not refrigerated. Ulla is refrigerated. Saskia is not consolidated. Saskia is not refrigerated. Thilo is tracked. Saskia is not tracked. Thilo is delayed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is not tracked, it then is palletized. #2 Each time a parcel is tracked, it then is not palletized. #3 Each time a parcel is not delayed, it then is scanned. #4 Each time a parcel is damaged, it then is rerouted. #5 Each time a parcel is not delayed, it then is oversized. #6 Each time a parcel is delayed, it then is not damaged. #7 Each time a parcel is not prepaid, it then is not labeled. #8 Each time a parcel is consolidated, it then is not oversized. #9 Each time a parcel is damaged, it then is not rerouted. #10 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is not scanned. #11 Each time a parcel is not palletized, it then is damaged. #9 is set aside if a parcel is not refrigerated. #9 is set aside if a parcel is consolidated. #8 is set aside if a parcel is delayed. #4 is set aside if a parcel is not consolidated. #4 yields to #9. #3 yields to #10. #6 yields to #11. #2 yields to #1. #8 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Thilo is rerouted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030878", "pair_id": "u030878-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030878-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ffd2b3a3050cdbe8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a9", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030890-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra has a background screening. Petra is licensed. Petra has a seniority step of 29. Petra is relocating. Petra has a notice period of 57. Petra is bilingual. Petra is not seasoned. Petra is bonded. Petra is recommended. Petra has an aptitude quotient of 90.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is onboarded and further has a notice period short of 57, it thereby is unionized. Point B. If said candidate has a seniority step of maximum 62 and further is recommended, it thereby is certified. Point C. If said candidate is certified and further has a background screening and further is recommended, it thereby is onboarded. Point D. If said candidate has a notice period of maximum 20, it thereby is a graduate. Point E. If said candidate has a seniority step of maximum 43, it thereby is not onboarded. Point F. If said candidate is onboarded and further has an aptitude quotient in excess of 10 and further is seasoned, it thereby is interviewed. Point G. If said candidate is relocating and further has a seniority step in excess of 72, it thereby is not a graduate. Point H. If said candidate is onboarded and further has a notice period of minimum 57 and further is licensed, it thereby is freelance. Point G is cancelled if said candidate is relocating and further is bilingual. Point D supersedes Point G. Point C supersedes Point E. Question: Which choice is true for Petra?", "options": ["is interviewed", "is freelance", "is unionized"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is freelance", "unit_id": "u030890", "pair_id": "u030890-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030890-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8e1dd4c2b10a75f0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a9", "a12"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u030890-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra has a background screening. Petra is licensed. Petra has a seniority step of 29. Petra is relocating. Petra has a notice period of 46. Petra is bilingual. Petra is not seasoned. Petra is bonded. Petra is recommended. Petra has an aptitude quotient of 90.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate is onboarded and further has a notice period short of 57, it thereby is unionized. Point B. If said candidate has a seniority step of maximum 62 and further is recommended, it thereby is certified. Point C. If said candidate is certified and further has a background screening and further is recommended, it thereby is onboarded. Point D. If said candidate has a notice period of maximum 20, it thereby is a graduate. Point E. If said candidate has a seniority step of maximum 43, it thereby is not onboarded. Point F. If said candidate is onboarded and further has an aptitude quotient in excess of 10 and further is seasoned, it thereby is interviewed. Point G. If said candidate is relocating and further has a seniority step in excess of 72, it thereby is not a graduate. Point H. If said candidate is onboarded and further has a notice period of minimum 57 and further is licensed, it thereby is freelance. Point G is cancelled if said candidate is relocating and further is bilingual. Point D supersedes Point G. Point C supersedes Point E. Question: Which choice is true for Petra?", "options": ["is interviewed", "is freelance", "is unionized"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is unionized", "unit_id": "u030890", "pair_id": "u030890-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030890-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d64117e3735efb82", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a9", "a12"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u030906-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is not postoperative. Benedek is triaged. Cosima is postoperative. Xenia is postoperative. Cosima has a pulse rate of 17. Cosima is triaged.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is postoperative, then it is hypertensive. (2) If a patient is triaged, then it has a chaperone. (3) If a patient has a pulse rate of at least 19, then it is referred. (4) If a patient is referred, then it is not admitted. (5) If a patient has a chaperone, then it is admitted. Question: Is it true that Benedek is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030906", "pair_id": "u030906-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030906-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "2aab0de1add219c7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u030906-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is not postoperative. Benedek is triaged. Cosima is postoperative. Xenia is postoperative. Cosima has a pulse rate of 17. Cosima is triaged.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is postoperative, then it is hypertensive. (2) If a patient is triaged, then it has a chaperone. (3) If a patient has a pulse rate of at least 19, then it is referred. (4) If a patient is referred, then it is not admitted. (5) If a patient is triaged, then it is sedated. (6) If a patient has a chaperone, then it is admitted. Question: Is it true that Benedek is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030906", "pair_id": "u030906-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030906-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "44ea8e32c19d169f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u030906-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is not postoperative. Benedek is triaged. Cosima is postoperative. Xenia is postoperative. Cosima has a pulse rate of 17. Cosima is triaged.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is postoperative, that patient is hypertensive. Item B. When the patient is triaged, that patient has a chaperone. Item C. When the patient has a pulse rate of no less than 19, that patient is referred. Item D. When the patient is referred, that patient is not admitted. Item E. When the patient has a chaperone, that patient is admitted. Question: Can one infer that Benedek is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030906", "pair_id": "u030906-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030906-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "2aab0de1add219c7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u030906-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is not postoperative. Benedek is triaged. Cosima is postoperative. Xenia is postoperative. Cosima has a pulse rate of 17. Cosima is triaged.", "instruction": "Item A. When the patient is postoperative, that patient is hypertensive. Item B. When the patient is triaged, that patient has a chaperone. Item C. When the patient has a pulse rate of no less than 19, that patient is referred. Item D. When the patient is referred, that patient is not admitted. Item E. When the patient is triaged, that patient is sedated. Item F. When the patient has a chaperone, that patient is admitted. Question: Can one infer that Benedek is admitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u030906", "pair_id": "u030906-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030906-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "44ea8e32c19d169f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u030925-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica has a lint backlog of 54. Quartz has a lint backlog of 28. Mica has no feature toggle. Quartz has a security advisory. Feldspar has a lint backlog of 13. Feldspar has no feature toggle. Mica has no security advisory.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a lint backlog at or above 67, thus it is not tested. Provision 2: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it has a changelog. Provision 3: when the build here has a security advisory, thus it is tested. Provision 4: when the build here has no security advisory, thus it is not reverted. Provision 5: when the build here has no feature toggle, thus it is reverted. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Mica is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030925", "pair_id": "u030925-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030925-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0bf008e5439f5aeb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030925-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica has a lint backlog of 54. Quartz has a lint backlog of 28. Mica has no feature toggle. Quartz has a security advisory. Feldspar has a lint backlog of 13. Feldspar has no feature toggle. Mica has no security advisory.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a lint backlog at or above 67, thus it is not tested. Provision 2: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it has a changelog. Provision 3: when the build here has a security advisory, thus it is tested. Provision 4: when the build here has no security advisory, thus it is not reverted. Provision 5: when the build here has a feature toggle, thus it is reverted. Provision 5 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Mica is tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030925", "pair_id": "u030925-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030925-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d55b829704005b5d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030925-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica has a lint backlog of 54. Quartz has a lint backlog of 28. Mica has no feature toggle. Quartz has a security advisory. Feldspar has a lint backlog of 13. Feldspar has no feature toggle. Mica has no security advisory.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a lint backlog not below 67, so it is not tested. No. 2 While the given build has a feature toggle, so it has a changelog. No. 3 While the given build has a security advisory, so it is tested. No. 4 While the given build has no security advisory, so it is not reverted. No. 5 While the given build has no feature toggle, so it is reverted. No. 5 wins over No. 4. No. 3 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Mica is tested\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030925", "pair_id": "u030925-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030925-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0bf008e5439f5aeb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030925-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica has a lint backlog of 54. Quartz has a lint backlog of 28. Mica has no feature toggle. Quartz has a security advisory. Feldspar has a lint backlog of 13. Feldspar has no feature toggle. Mica has no security advisory.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a lint backlog not below 67, so it is not tested. No. 2 While the given build has a feature toggle, so it has a changelog. No. 3 While the given build has a security advisory, so it is tested. No. 4 While the given build has no security advisory, so it is not reverted. No. 5 While the given build has a feature toggle, so it is reverted. No. 5 wins over No. 4. No. 3 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Mica is tested\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030925", "pair_id": "u030925-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030925-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d55b829704005b5d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u030926-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Agata is a smoker. Edda is a smoker. Edda is not bundled. Agata is not bundled. Edda is indemnified. Edda is reinstated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver while is not bundled, thus it is disputed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver while is bundled, thus it has roadside assistance. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it has a rider. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is not indemnified while is a smoker, thus it has no deductible waiver. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it has a deductible waiver. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is a smoker, thus it is subrogated. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Which one describes Edda?", "options": ["is disputed", "has roadside assistance"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is disputed", "unit_id": "u030926", "pair_id": "u030926-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030926-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e3edab7ec64a246a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a6"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030926-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Agata is a smoker. Edda is a smoker. Edda is bundled. Agata is not bundled. Edda is indemnified. Edda is reinstated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver while is not bundled, thus it is disputed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver while is bundled, thus it has roadside assistance. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it has a rider. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is not indemnified while is a smoker, thus it has no deductible waiver. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it has a deductible waiver. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is a smoker, thus it is subrogated. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Which one describes Edda?", "options": ["is disputed", "has roadside assistance"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has roadside assistance", "unit_id": "u030926", "pair_id": "u030926-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030926-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d5c1f2cd87a341de", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a6"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030926-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Agata is a smoker. Edda is a smoker. Edda is not bundled. Agata is not bundled. Edda is indemnified. Edda is reinstated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver and likewise is not bundled, so it is disputed. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver and likewise is bundled, so it has roadside assistance. No. 3 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it has a rider. No. 4 While the given policyholder is not indemnified and likewise is a smoker, so it has no deductible waiver. No. 5 While the given policyholder is subrogated, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 6 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it is subrogated. No. 4 wins over No. 5. Question: Select what holds for Edda: which option?", "options": ["is disputed", "has roadside assistance"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is disputed", "unit_id": "u030926", "pair_id": "u030926-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030926-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e3edab7ec64a246a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a6"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030926-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Agata is a smoker. Edda is a smoker. Edda is bundled. Agata is not bundled. Edda is indemnified. Edda is reinstated.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver and likewise is not bundled, so it is disputed. No. 2 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver and likewise is bundled, so it has roadside assistance. No. 3 While the given policyholder is reinstated, so it has a rider. No. 4 While the given policyholder is not indemnified and likewise is a smoker, so it has no deductible waiver. No. 5 While the given policyholder is subrogated, so it has a deductible waiver. No. 6 While the given policyholder is a smoker, so it is subrogated. No. 4 wins over No. 5. Question: Select what holds for Edda: which option?", "options": ["is disputed", "has roadside assistance"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has roadside assistance", "unit_id": "u030926", "pair_id": "u030926-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030926-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d5c1f2cd87a341de", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a0", "a6"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u030954-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is monitored. Nimbus is monitored. Quasar is not monitored. Quasar is not isolated. Juno is isolated. Quasar has no failover node. Quasar is replicated. Juno is deprecated. Nimbus is replicated. Nimbus is isolated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is backed up and also is deprecated, it also is throttled. Clause 2: once any workload is monitored and also is isolated, it also is not cached. Clause 3: once any workload has a failover node and also is not replicated and also is monitored, it also is sharded. Clause 4: once any workload is backed up and also is not deprecated and also is monitored, it also is not throttled. Clause 5: once any workload is not cached, it also is backed up. Question: Does it follow that Nimbus is not throttled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u030954", "pair_id": "u030954-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030954-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "db251a44bcaf3079", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030954-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is monitored. Nimbus is monitored. Quasar is not monitored. Quasar is not isolated. Juno is isolated. Nimbus is deprecated. Quasar has no failover node. Quasar is replicated. Juno is deprecated. Nimbus is replicated. Nimbus is isolated.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is backed up and also is deprecated, it also is throttled. Clause 2: once any workload is monitored and also is isolated, it also is not cached. Clause 3: once any workload has a failover node and also is not replicated and also is monitored, it also is sharded. Clause 4: once any workload is backed up and also is not deprecated and also is monitored, it also is not throttled. Clause 5: once any workload is not cached, it also is backed up. Question: Does it follow that Nimbus is not throttled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030954", "pair_id": "u030954-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030954-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "2ed670d9f902dc0b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030956-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Edda has no beneficiary. Edda has a peril factor of 95. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 85. Wanda has a beneficiary. Edda has a payout ceiling of 89. Wanda has a peril factor of 23.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a premium band of no more than 62, that policyholder is disputed. Item B. When the policyholder has a beneficiary, that policyholder is retired. Item C. When the policyholder has a peril factor of more than 59, that policyholder is appraised. Item D. When the policyholder has a peril factor of no more than 59, that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Item E. When the policyholder has a premium band of more than 62, that policyholder is litigated. Item F. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of less than 66, that policyholder is indemnified. Item G. When the policyholder has a claim frequency of less than 83, that policyholder is a smoker. Item H. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of no more than 68, that policyholder is covered. Item I. When the policyholder has a claim frequency of no less than 83, that policyholder has a dashcam. Question: What applies to Edda?", "options": ["is appraised", "has a dashcam", "is disputed", "is litigated", "has a deductible waiver", "is indemnified", "is a smoker"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is appraised", "unit_id": "u030956", "pair_id": "u030956-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030956-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "7c6eba0ce5025c19", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a9", "a4", "a13", "a5", "a12", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030956-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Edda has no beneficiary. Edda has a peril factor of 23. Wanda has a payout ceiling of 85. Wanda has a beneficiary. Edda has a payout ceiling of 89. Wanda has a peril factor of 23.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder has a premium band of no more than 62, that policyholder is disputed. Item B. When the policyholder has a beneficiary, that policyholder is retired. Item C. When the policyholder has a peril factor of more than 59, that policyholder is appraised. Item D. When the policyholder has a peril factor of no more than 59, that policyholder has a deductible waiver. Item E. When the policyholder has a premium band of more than 62, that policyholder is litigated. Item F. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of less than 66, that policyholder is indemnified. Item G. When the policyholder has a claim frequency of less than 83, that policyholder is a smoker. Item H. When the policyholder has a payout ceiling of no more than 68, that policyholder is covered. Item I. When the policyholder has a claim frequency of no less than 83, that policyholder has a dashcam. Question: What applies to Edda?", "options": ["is appraised", "has a dashcam", "is disputed", "is litigated", "has a deductible waiver", "is indemnified", "is a smoker"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a deductible waiver", "unit_id": "u030956", "pair_id": "u030956-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030956-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "909e5a45c7df7083", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a10", "a9", "a4", "a13", "a5", "a12", "a2"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030958-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is not embargoed. Hadar has no field site. Hadar is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has a field site, it thereby is exploratory. Point B. If said proposal is longitudinal, it thereby has seed funding. Point C. If said proposal is interdisciplinary, it thereby is cofunded. Point D. If said proposal is shortlisted, it thereby has a steering committee. Point E. If said proposal is endorsed, it thereby has ethics clearance. Point F. If said proposal has ethics clearance, it thereby is theoretical. Point G. If said proposal is cofunded, it thereby is longitudinal. Point H. If said proposal is exploratory, it thereby is shortlisted. Point I. If said proposal is not embargoed, it thereby is endorsed. Point J. If said proposal is multicenter, it thereby is collaborative. Point K. If said proposal is embargoed, it thereby has no seed funding. Point L. If said proposal is endorsed, it thereby has no seed funding. Point K supersedes Point B. Point L supersedes Point B. Question: Which choice is true for Hadar?", "options": ["has a steering committee", "is theoretical", "has seed funding"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is theoretical", "unit_id": "u030958", "pair_id": "u030958-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030958-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e08d08005ae02b5c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030958-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is not embargoed. Hadar has no field site. Hadar is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "Point A. If said proposal has a field site, it thereby is exploratory. Point B. If said proposal is longitudinal, it thereby has seed funding. Point C. If said proposal is interdisciplinary, it thereby is cofunded. Point D. If said proposal is shortlisted, it thereby has a steering committee. Point E. If said proposal is endorsed, it thereby has ethics clearance. Point F. If said proposal has ethics clearance, it thereby is theoretical. Point G. If said proposal is cofunded, it thereby is longitudinal. Point H. If said proposal is exploratory, it thereby is shortlisted. Point I. If said proposal is embargoed, it thereby is endorsed. Point J. If said proposal is multicenter, it thereby is collaborative. Point K. If said proposal is embargoed, it thereby has no seed funding. Point L. If said proposal is endorsed, it thereby has no seed funding. Point K supersedes Point B. Point L supersedes Point B. Question: Which choice is true for Hadar?", "options": ["has a steering committee", "is theoretical", "has seed funding"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has seed funding", "unit_id": "u030958", "pair_id": "u030958-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030958-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "303c6503e839c75a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030958-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is not embargoed. Hadar has no field site. Hadar is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a field site, so it is exploratory. No. 2 While the given proposal is longitudinal, so it has seed funding. No. 3 While the given proposal is interdisciplinary, so it is cofunded. No. 4 While the given proposal is shortlisted, so it has a steering committee. No. 5 While the given proposal is endorsed, so it has ethics clearance. No. 6 While the given proposal has ethics clearance, so it is theoretical. No. 7 While the given proposal is cofunded, so it is longitudinal. No. 8 While the given proposal is exploratory, so it is shortlisted. No. 9 While the given proposal is not embargoed, so it is endorsed. No. 10 While the given proposal is multicenter, so it is collaborative. No. 11 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it has no seed funding. No. 12 While the given proposal is endorsed, so it has no seed funding. No. 11 wins over No. 2. No. 12 wins over No. 2. Question: Select what holds for Hadar: which option?", "options": ["has a steering committee", "is theoretical", "has seed funding"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is theoretical", "unit_id": "u030958", "pair_id": "u030958-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030958-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e08d08005ae02b5c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030958-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Hadar is not embargoed. Hadar has no field site. Hadar is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given proposal has a field site, so it is exploratory. No. 2 While the given proposal is longitudinal, so it has seed funding. No. 3 While the given proposal is interdisciplinary, so it is cofunded. No. 4 While the given proposal is shortlisted, so it has a steering committee. No. 5 While the given proposal is endorsed, so it has ethics clearance. No. 6 While the given proposal has ethics clearance, so it is theoretical. No. 7 While the given proposal is cofunded, so it is longitudinal. No. 8 While the given proposal is exploratory, so it is shortlisted. No. 9 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it is endorsed. No. 10 While the given proposal is multicenter, so it is collaborative. No. 11 While the given proposal is embargoed, so it has no seed funding. No. 12 While the given proposal is endorsed, so it has no seed funding. No. 11 wins over No. 2. No. 12 wins over No. 2. Question: Select what holds for Hadar: which option?", "options": ["has a steering committee", "is theoretical", "has seed funding"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has seed funding", "unit_id": "u030958", "pair_id": "u030958-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u030958-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "303c6503e839c75a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a9", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u030959-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid is not a homeowner. Hamid is employed. Anouk has a debt ratio of 7. Ingrid has a repayment grade of 88. Ingrid is not employed. Hamid has a repayment grade of 96. Hamid has a debt ratio of 48. Anouk is a homeowner. Hamid is not a homeowner. Anouk has a credit rating of 85.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has a debt ratio beneath 70 while is a homeowner while has a credit rating beyond 58, thus it is delinquent. Provision 2: when the borrower here is employed, thus it is solvent. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a debt ratio beneath 70 while has a repayment grade beneath 83, thus it has a guarantor. Provision 4: when the borrower here has a repayment grade at or below 84, thus it is not solvent. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here is a homeowner. Provision 2 has no effect when the borrower here is a homeowner. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Anouk?", "options": ["has a guarantor", "is delinquent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is delinquent", "unit_id": "u030959", "pair_id": "u030959-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030959-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8ff9f306b4cf72f4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u030959-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid is not a homeowner. Hamid is employed. Anouk has a debt ratio of 7. Ingrid has a repayment grade of 88. Ingrid is not employed. Hamid has a repayment grade of 96. Hamid has a debt ratio of 48. Anouk has a repayment grade of 48. Anouk is a homeowner. Hamid is not a homeowner. Anouk has a credit rating of 85.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has a debt ratio beneath 70 while is a homeowner while has a credit rating beyond 58, thus it is delinquent. Provision 2: when the borrower here is employed, thus it is solvent. Provision 3: when the borrower here has a debt ratio beneath 70 while has a repayment grade beneath 83, thus it has a guarantor. Provision 4: when the borrower here has a repayment grade at or below 84, thus it is not solvent. Provision 3 has no effect when the borrower here is a homeowner. Provision 2 has no effect when the borrower here is a homeowner. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Which one describes Anouk?", "options": ["has a guarantor", "is delinquent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is delinquent", "unit_id": "u030959", "pair_id": "u030959-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030959-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "48f4d8281cbf71ce", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u030959-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid is not a homeowner. Hamid is employed. Anouk has a debt ratio of 7. Ingrid has a repayment grade of 88. Ingrid is not employed. Hamid has a repayment grade of 96. Hamid has a debt ratio of 48. Anouk is a homeowner. Hamid is not a homeowner. Anouk has a credit rating of 85.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has a debt ratio short of 70 and further is a homeowner and further has a credit rating in excess of 58, it thereby is delinquent. Point B. If said borrower is employed, it thereby is solvent. Point C. If said borrower has a debt ratio short of 70 and further has a repayment grade short of 83, it thereby has a guarantor. Point D. If said borrower has a repayment grade of maximum 84, it thereby is not solvent. Point C is cancelled if said borrower is a homeowner. Point B is cancelled if said borrower is a homeowner. Point B supersedes Point D. Question: Which choice is true for Anouk?", "options": ["has a guarantor", "is delinquent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is delinquent", "unit_id": "u030959", "pair_id": "u030959-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030959-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8ff9f306b4cf72f4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u030959-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid is not a homeowner. Hamid is employed. Anouk has a debt ratio of 7. Ingrid has a repayment grade of 88. Ingrid is not employed. Hamid has a repayment grade of 96. Hamid has a debt ratio of 48. Anouk has a repayment grade of 48. Anouk is a homeowner. Hamid is not a homeowner. Anouk has a credit rating of 85.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has a debt ratio short of 70 and further is a homeowner and further has a credit rating in excess of 58, it thereby is delinquent. Point B. If said borrower is employed, it thereby is solvent. Point C. If said borrower has a debt ratio short of 70 and further has a repayment grade short of 83, it thereby has a guarantor. Point D. If said borrower has a repayment grade of maximum 84, it thereby is not solvent. Point C is cancelled if said borrower is a homeowner. Point B is cancelled if said borrower is a homeowner. Point B supersedes Point D. Question: Which choice is true for Anouk?", "options": ["has a guarantor", "is delinquent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is delinquent", "unit_id": "u030959", "pair_id": "u030959-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030959-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "48f4d8281cbf71ce", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u030959-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid is not a homeowner. Hamid is employed. Anouk has a debt ratio of 7. Ingrid has a repayment grade of 88. Ingrid is not employed. Hamid has a repayment grade of 96. Hamid has a debt ratio of 48. Anouk is a homeowner. Hamid is not a homeowner. Anouk has a credit rating of 85.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has a debt ratio that falls below 70 and likewise is a homeowner and likewise has a credit rating that exceeds 58, so it is delinquent. No. 2 While the given borrower is employed, so it is solvent. No. 3 While the given borrower has a debt ratio that falls below 70 and likewise has a repayment grade that falls below 83, so it has a guarantor. No. 4 While the given borrower has a repayment grade not above 84, so it is not solvent. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given borrower is a homeowner. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given borrower is a homeowner. No. 2 wins over No. 4. Question: Select what holds for Anouk: which option?", "options": ["has a guarantor", "is delinquent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is delinquent", "unit_id": "u030959", "pair_id": "u030959-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030959-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8ff9f306b4cf72f4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u030959-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ingrid is not a homeowner. Hamid is employed. Anouk has a debt ratio of 7. Ingrid has a repayment grade of 88. Ingrid is not employed. Hamid has a repayment grade of 96. Hamid has a debt ratio of 48. Anouk has a repayment grade of 48. Anouk is a homeowner. Hamid is not a homeowner. Anouk has a credit rating of 85.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has a debt ratio that falls below 70 and likewise is a homeowner and likewise has a credit rating that exceeds 58, so it is delinquent. No. 2 While the given borrower is employed, so it is solvent. No. 3 While the given borrower has a debt ratio that falls below 70 and likewise has a repayment grade that falls below 83, so it has a guarantor. No. 4 While the given borrower has a repayment grade not above 84, so it is not solvent. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given borrower is a homeowner. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given borrower is a homeowner. No. 2 wins over No. 4. Question: Select what holds for Anouk: which option?", "options": ["has a guarantor", "is delinquent"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is delinquent", "unit_id": "u030959", "pair_id": "u030959-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030959-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "48f4d8281cbf71ce", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a6", "a2"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u030971-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is not reinstated. Celeste is appraised. Edda is appraised. Celeste is not reinstated. Celeste is grandfathered. Bruno is not appraised. Fabian is not reinstated. Fabian is appraised. Celeste has a rider. Fabian is not grandfathered. Edda is grandfathered. Edda has a rider. Bruno is not grandfathered. Fabian has a rider.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is disputed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is not reinstated, thus it is litigated. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is grandfathered while is reinstated, thus it is inspected. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance while has a rider while is reinstated, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a rider, thus it has roadside assistance. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance while is appraised, thus it has no beneficiary. Question: Would it be right to say that Celeste has a beneficiary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030971", "pair_id": "u030971-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030971-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "f0046021d316d9cc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u030971-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is not reinstated. Celeste is appraised. Edda is appraised. Celeste is not reinstated. Celeste is grandfathered. Bruno is not appraised. Fabian is not reinstated. Fabian is appraised. Celeste has a rider. Fabian is not grandfathered. Edda is grandfathered. Edda has a rider. Bruno is not grandfathered. Fabian has a rider.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is disputed. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is reinstated, thus it is litigated. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is grandfathered while is reinstated, thus it is inspected. Provision 4: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance while has a rider while is reinstated, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 5: when the policyholder here has a rider, thus it has roadside assistance. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance while is appraised, thus it has no beneficiary. Question: Would it be right to say that Celeste has a beneficiary?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030971", "pair_id": "u030971-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030971-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "92cea516479cec25", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u030971-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is not reinstated. Celeste is appraised. Edda is appraised. Celeste is not reinstated. Celeste is grandfathered. Bruno is not appraised. Fabian is not reinstated. Fabian is appraised. Celeste has a rider. Fabian is not grandfathered. Edda is grandfathered. Edda has a rider. Bruno is not grandfathered. Fabian has a rider.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby is disputed. Point B. If said policyholder is not reinstated, it thereby is litigated. Point C. If said policyholder is grandfathered and further is reinstated, it thereby is inspected. Point D. If said policyholder has roadside assistance and further has a rider and further is reinstated, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point E. If said policyholder has a rider, it thereby has roadside assistance. Point F. If said policyholder has roadside assistance and further is appraised, it thereby has no beneficiary. Question: Statement: Celeste has a beneficiary. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030971", "pair_id": "u030971-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030971-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "f0046021d316d9cc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u030971-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Edda is not reinstated. Celeste is appraised. Edda is appraised. Celeste is not reinstated. Celeste is grandfathered. Bruno is not appraised. Fabian is not reinstated. Fabian is appraised. Celeste has a rider. Fabian is not grandfathered. Edda is grandfathered. Edda has a rider. Bruno is not grandfathered. Fabian has a rider.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby is disputed. Point B. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby is litigated. Point C. If said policyholder is grandfathered and further is reinstated, it thereby is inspected. Point D. If said policyholder has roadside assistance and further has a rider and further is reinstated, it thereby has a beneficiary. Point E. If said policyholder has a rider, it thereby has roadside assistance. Point F. If said policyholder has roadside assistance and further is appraised, it thereby has no beneficiary. Question: Statement: Celeste has a beneficiary. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u030971", "pair_id": "u030971-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u030971-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "92cea516479cec25", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031007-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not documented. Quartz is documented. Shale has a test yield of 87. Zircon has a test yield of 64. Quartz has a test yield of 71. Quartz is not versioned. Zircon is not documented. Zircon is versioned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is versioned, so it is flaky. No. 2 While the given build has a test yield that exceeds 85, so it is compiled. No. 3 While the given build has a test yield not below 67, so it is not flaky. No. 4 While the given build has a test yield that falls below 16, so it is obsolete. No. 1 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Shale is not documented\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031007", "pair_id": "u031007-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031007-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "498cd2e25ea3cd9a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031007-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not documented. Quartz is documented. Shale has a test yield of 87. Zircon has a test yield of 64. Quartz has a test yield of 71. Shale is not documented. Quartz is not versioned. Zircon is not documented. Zircon is versioned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is versioned, so it is flaky. No. 2 While the given build has a test yield that exceeds 85, so it is compiled. No. 3 While the given build has a test yield not below 67, so it is not flaky. No. 4 While the given build has a test yield that falls below 16, so it is obsolete. No. 1 wins over No. 3. Question: Is the claim \"Shale is not documented\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031007", "pair_id": "u031007-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031007-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c358b0ada2b1049b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031015-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is not fingerprinted. Kalle is not fingerprinted. Olek has no background screening. Teodor is not fingerprinted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has a background screening, thus it is not headhunted. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a background screening, thus it is not recommended. Provision 3: when the candidate here has a background screening, thus it is seasoned. Provision 4: when the candidate here has a portfolio, thus it is not unionized. Provision 5: when the candidate here is not fingerprinted, thus it is unionized. Question: Would it be right to say that Olek is not unionized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031015", "pair_id": "u031015-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031015-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "cb998609bb939672", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031015-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is not fingerprinted. Kalle is not fingerprinted. Olek has no background screening. Teodor is not fingerprinted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has a background screening, thus it is not headhunted. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a background screening, thus it is not recommended. Provision 3: when the candidate here has a background screening, thus it is seasoned. Provision 4: when the candidate here has a portfolio, thus it is not unionized. Provision 5: when the candidate here is fingerprinted, thus it is unionized. Question: Would it be right to say that Olek is not unionized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031015", "pair_id": "u031015-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031015-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "17ba0c561541e733", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031015-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is not fingerprinted. Kalle is not fingerprinted. Olek has no background screening. Teodor is not fingerprinted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is not headhunted. Point B. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is not recommended. Point C. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is seasoned. Point D. If said candidate has a portfolio, it thereby is not unionized. Point E. If said candidate is not fingerprinted, it thereby is unionized. Question: Statement: Olek is not unionized. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031015", "pair_id": "u031015-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031015-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "cb998609bb939672", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031015-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Olek is not fingerprinted. Kalle is not fingerprinted. Olek has no background screening. Teodor is not fingerprinted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is not headhunted. Point B. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is not recommended. Point C. If said candidate has a background screening, it thereby is seasoned. Point D. If said candidate has a portfolio, it thereby is not unionized. Point E. If said candidate is fingerprinted, it thereby is unionized. Question: Statement: Olek is not unionized. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031015", "pair_id": "u031015-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031015-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "17ba0c561541e733", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031016-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid is certified. Mads is a graduate. Sigrid is bonded. Sigrid has no background screening. Mads is certified. Mads is headhunted. Sigrid is not a graduate. Sigrid is not headhunted. Mads has a background screening.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is sponsored: then it has a signing bonus. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has no background screening: then it is relocating. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is not a graduate plus is not certified plus is bonded: then it is not sponsored. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is not a graduate plus is certified plus is not headhunted: then it is sponsored. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is sponsored: then it is fingerprinted. Question: Is it so that Sigrid is sponsored?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031016", "pair_id": "u031016-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031016-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "384301776b43b72a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031016-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sigrid is certified. Mads is a graduate. Sigrid is bonded. Sigrid has a background screening. Mads is certified. Mads is headhunted. Sigrid is not a graduate. Sigrid is not headhunted. Mads has a background screening.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate is sponsored: then it has a signing bonus. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has no background screening: then it is relocating. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is not a graduate plus is not certified plus is bonded: then it is not sponsored. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate is not a graduate plus is certified plus is not headhunted: then it is sponsored. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is sponsored: then it is fingerprinted. Question: Is it so that Sigrid is sponsored?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031016", "pair_id": "u031016-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031016-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "a0922282fbdc9394", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031060-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a credit rating of 67. Corin has no guarantor. Ilse is not creditworthy. Ilse has a risk tier of 50. Corin is not indebted. Ilse has a debt ratio of 97. Folke has a risk tier of 22. Corin has a risk tier of 55. Corin has a debt ratio of 4. Ilse has a guarantor. Ilse is indebted. Corin has a credit rating of 87. Ilse is not garnished. Corin is not creditworthy.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has a guarantor and likewise is creditworthy, so it is foreclosed. No. 2 While the given borrower is creditworthy, so it has no cosigner. No. 3 While the given borrower is underwritten and likewise has a credit rating not above 88 and likewise is indebted, so it is overdrawn. No. 4 While the given borrower is underwritten and likewise has a credit rating that exceeds 88 and likewise is indebted, so it is not overdrawn. No. 5 While the given borrower is audited and likewise has a debt ratio not below 83, so it is underwritten. No. 6 While the given borrower is not garnished, so it is audited. No. 7 While the given borrower has a credit rating not below 66, so it is not amortized. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a risk tier not above 71 and likewise has a debt ratio not above 36. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given borrower is garnished. Question: Is the claim \"Ilse is overdrawn\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031060", "pair_id": "u031060-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031060-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2e17381b6df141bc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u031060-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ilse has a credit rating of 3. Corin has no guarantor. Ilse is not creditworthy. Ilse has a risk tier of 50. Corin is not indebted. Ilse has a debt ratio of 97. Folke has a risk tier of 22. Corin has a risk tier of 55. Corin has a debt ratio of 4. Ilse has a guarantor. Ilse is indebted. Corin has a credit rating of 87. Ilse is not garnished. Corin is not creditworthy.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has a guarantor and likewise is creditworthy, so it is foreclosed. No. 2 While the given borrower is creditworthy, so it has no cosigner. No. 3 While the given borrower is underwritten and likewise has a credit rating not above 88 and likewise is indebted, so it is overdrawn. No. 4 While the given borrower is underwritten and likewise has a credit rating that exceeds 88 and likewise is indebted, so it is not overdrawn. No. 5 While the given borrower is audited and likewise has a debt ratio not below 83, so it is underwritten. No. 6 While the given borrower is not garnished, so it is audited. No. 7 While the given borrower has a credit rating not below 66, so it is not amortized. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a risk tier not above 71 and likewise has a debt ratio not above 36. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given borrower is garnished. Question: Is the claim \"Ilse is overdrawn\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031060", "pair_id": "u031060-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031060-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f67c998dcab2e806", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u031064-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not appraised. Xaver is bundled. Una is appraised. Bruno has no deductible waiver. Agata is not bundled. Agata has flood coverage. Una has a peril factor of 13. Agata has a deductible waiver. Bruno is bundled. Agata has a peril factor of 84.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it is not reinstated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is not bundled, thus it is reinstated. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it has no rider. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is appraised, thus it is indemnified. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is not indemnified. Provision 7: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is subrogated. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it has a rider. Provision 10: when the policyholder here has a peril factor at or above 46, thus it has no dashcam. Provision 11: when the policyholder here has a dashcam, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 11. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Agata is reimbursed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031064", "pair_id": "u031064-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031064-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "308c087b091dcd64", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031064-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not appraised. Xaver is bundled. Una is appraised. Bruno has no deductible waiver. Agata is not bundled. Agata has flood coverage. Una has a peril factor of 13. Agata has a deductible waiver. Bruno is bundled. Agata has a peril factor of 84.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here is reimbursed, thus it is not reinstated. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it is reinstated. Provision 3: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it has no rider. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is bundled, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is appraised, thus it is indemnified. Provision 6: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is not indemnified. Provision 7: when the policyholder here has a deductible waiver, thus it is subrogated. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is subrogated, thus it is reimbursed. Provision 9: when the policyholder here has flood coverage, thus it has a rider. Provision 10: when the policyholder here has a peril factor at or above 46, thus it has no dashcam. Provision 11: when the policyholder here has a dashcam, thus it is not reimbursed. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 11. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 1. Provision 10 has priority over Provision 4. Question: Would it be right to say that Agata is reimbursed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031064", "pair_id": "u031064-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031064-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1f550da09fb3db38", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031064-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not appraised. Xaver is bundled. Una is appraised. Bruno has no deductible waiver. Agata is not bundled. Agata has flood coverage. Una has a peril factor of 13. Agata has a deductible waiver. Bruno is bundled. Agata has a peril factor of 84.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby is not reinstated. Point B. If said policyholder is not bundled, it thereby is reinstated. Point C. If said policyholder has a deductible waiver, it thereby has no rider. Point D. If said policyholder is bundled, it thereby has a dashcam. Point E. If said policyholder is appraised, it thereby is indemnified. Point F. If said policyholder has a deductible waiver, it thereby is not indemnified. Point G. If said policyholder has a deductible waiver, it thereby is subrogated. Point H. If said policyholder is subrogated, it thereby is reimbursed. Point I. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby has a rider. Point J. If said policyholder has a peril factor of minimum 46, it thereby has no dashcam. Point K. If said policyholder has a dashcam, it thereby is not reimbursed. Point C supersedes Point I. Point F supersedes Point E. Point H supersedes Point K. Point B supersedes Point A. Point J supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Agata is reimbursed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031064", "pair_id": "u031064-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031064-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "308c087b091dcd64", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031064-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not appraised. Xaver is bundled. Una is appraised. Bruno has no deductible waiver. Agata is not bundled. Agata has flood coverage. Una has a peril factor of 13. Agata has a deductible waiver. Bruno is bundled. Agata has a peril factor of 84.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is reimbursed, it thereby is not reinstated. Point B. If said policyholder is bundled, it thereby is reinstated. Point C. If said policyholder has a deductible waiver, it thereby has no rider. Point D. If said policyholder is bundled, it thereby has a dashcam. Point E. If said policyholder is appraised, it thereby is indemnified. Point F. If said policyholder has a deductible waiver, it thereby is not indemnified. Point G. If said policyholder has a deductible waiver, it thereby is subrogated. Point H. If said policyholder is subrogated, it thereby is reimbursed. Point I. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby has a rider. Point J. If said policyholder has a peril factor of minimum 46, it thereby has no dashcam. Point K. If said policyholder has a dashcam, it thereby is not reimbursed. Point C supersedes Point I. Point F supersedes Point E. Point H supersedes Point K. Point B supersedes Point A. Point J supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Agata is reimbursed. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031064", "pair_id": "u031064-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031064-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1f550da09fb3db38", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031064-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not appraised. Xaver is bundled. Una is appraised. Bruno has no deductible waiver. Agata is not bundled. Agata has flood coverage. Una has a peril factor of 13. Agata has a deductible waiver. Bruno is bundled. Agata has a peril factor of 84.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is reimbursed, so it is not reinstated. No. 2 While the given policyholder is not bundled, so it is reinstated. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it has no rider. No. 4 While the given policyholder is bundled, so it has a dashcam. No. 5 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it is indemnified. No. 6 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it is not indemnified. No. 7 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it is subrogated. No. 8 While the given policyholder is subrogated, so it is reimbursed. No. 9 While the given policyholder has flood coverage, so it has a rider. No. 10 While the given policyholder has a peril factor not below 46, so it has no dashcam. No. 11 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is not reimbursed. No. 3 wins over No. 9. No. 6 wins over No. 5. No. 8 wins over No. 11. No. 2 wins over No. 1. No. 10 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Agata is reimbursed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031064", "pair_id": "u031064-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031064-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "308c087b091dcd64", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031064-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata is not appraised. Xaver is bundled. Una is appraised. Bruno has no deductible waiver. Agata is not bundled. Agata has flood coverage. Una has a peril factor of 13. Agata has a deductible waiver. Bruno is bundled. Agata has a peril factor of 84.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is reimbursed, so it is not reinstated. No. 2 While the given policyholder is bundled, so it is reinstated. No. 3 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it has no rider. No. 4 While the given policyholder is bundled, so it has a dashcam. No. 5 While the given policyholder is appraised, so it is indemnified. No. 6 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it is not indemnified. No. 7 While the given policyholder has a deductible waiver, so it is subrogated. No. 8 While the given policyholder is subrogated, so it is reimbursed. No. 9 While the given policyholder has flood coverage, so it has a rider. No. 10 While the given policyholder has a peril factor not below 46, so it has no dashcam. No. 11 While the given policyholder has a dashcam, so it is not reimbursed. No. 3 wins over No. 9. No. 6 wins over No. 5. No. 8 wins over No. 11. No. 2 wins over No. 1. No. 10 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Agata is reimbursed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031064", "pair_id": "u031064-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031064-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1f550da09fb3db38", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031077-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is a veteran. Lotte has a notice period of 99. Lotte is a veteran. Kalle has a notice period of 18. Lotte has no mentor. Kalle has no mentor. Kalle is onboarded.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has a notice period beneath 57, thus it is relocating. Provision 2: when the candidate here is onboarded, thus it is eligible. Provision 3: when the candidate here is a veteran, thus it is bonded. Provision 4: when the candidate here is eligible, thus it has no signing bonus. Provision 5: when the candidate here is eligible, thus it has a signing bonus. Provision 5 has no effect when the candidate here has no mentor. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here has an aptitude quotient beyond 14. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here has an aptitude quotient beyond 25. Provision 4 has no effect when the candidate here has a mentor. Question: Would it be right to say that Kalle has a signing bonus?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031077", "pair_id": "u031077-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031077-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0b49dccb5a5eb9af", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031077-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kalle is a veteran. Lotte has a notice period of 99. Lotte is a veteran. Kalle has a notice period of 18. Lotte has no mentor. Kalle has no mentor. Kalle is onboarded.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has a notice period beneath 57, thus it is relocating. Provision 2: when the candidate here is not onboarded, thus it is eligible. Provision 3: when the candidate here is a veteran, thus it is bonded. Provision 4: when the candidate here is eligible, thus it has no signing bonus. Provision 5: when the candidate here is eligible, thus it has a signing bonus. Provision 5 has no effect when the candidate here has no mentor. Provision 2 has no effect when the candidate here has an aptitude quotient beyond 14. Provision 1 has no effect when the candidate here has an aptitude quotient beyond 25. Provision 4 has no effect when the candidate here has a mentor. Question: Would it be right to say that Kalle has a signing bonus?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031077", "pair_id": "u031077-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031077-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1b03872f2bccdc4b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031140-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is monitored. Orrery has a public endpoint. Orrery has a replica count of 23. Orrery has a CPU quota of 12.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload has a snapshot provided that it has a public endpoint as well as has a replica count lower than 22 as well as has a CPU quota of 70 or lower. Section 2: a workload is backed up provided that it is monitored. Section 3: a workload is throttled provided that it has a snapshot as well as has a dedicated host as well as has a public endpoint. Section 4: a workload has no snapshot provided that it has a public endpoint as well as has a replica count of 22 or higher. Section 3 lapses for a workload if it has a public endpoint. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it has a replica count of 34 or lower. Section 4 lapses for a workload if it is stateless. Question: Orrery has a snapshot. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031140", "pair_id": "u031140-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031140-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4b42bba36ba32a35", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u031140-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery is monitored. Orrery has a public endpoint. Orrery has a replica count of 71. Orrery has a CPU quota of 12.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload has a snapshot provided that it has a public endpoint as well as has a replica count lower than 22 as well as has a CPU quota of 70 or lower. Section 2: a workload is backed up provided that it is monitored. Section 3: a workload is throttled provided that it has a snapshot as well as has a dedicated host as well as has a public endpoint. Section 4: a workload has no snapshot provided that it has a public endpoint as well as has a replica count of 22 or higher. Section 3 lapses for a workload if it has a public endpoint. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it has a replica count of 34 or lower. Section 4 lapses for a workload if it is stateless. Question: Orrery has a snapshot. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031140", "pair_id": "u031140-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031140-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "78c7cdb9cef9fa63", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u031166-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not discharged. Xenia is not anemic. Xenia is referred. Wendel is not referred. Xenia is not hypertensive. Wendel is discharged. Xenia is not waitlisted. Wendel has no chaperone. Xenia is triaged. Xenia has a chaperone. Wendel is not rescheduled. Xenia is not rescheduled.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is not referred and further is triaged and further is hypertensive, it thereby is not bedridden. Point B. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is admitted. Point C. If said patient is discharged, it thereby is not pregnant. Point D. If said patient is hypertensive, it thereby is bedridden. Point E. If said patient is admitted and further is anemic and further is waitlisted, it thereby is symptomatic. Point F. If said patient has a chaperone, it thereby is pregnant. Point G. If said patient is admitted and further is not anemic and further is triaged, it thereby is not symptomatic. Point H. If said patient is rescheduled and further is triaged, it thereby is not admitted. Point A is cancelled if said patient is not anemic and further is triaged. Point E supersedes Point G. Point B supersedes Point H. Point C supersedes Point F. Point A supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Xenia is not symptomatic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031166", "pair_id": "u031166-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031166-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cb103eaf5678baac", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031166-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia is not discharged. Xenia is not anemic. Xenia is referred. Wendel is not referred. Xenia is hypertensive. Wendel is discharged. Xenia is not waitlisted. Wendel has no chaperone. Xenia is triaged. Xenia has a chaperone. Wendel is not rescheduled. Xenia is not rescheduled.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient is not referred and further is triaged and further is hypertensive, it thereby is not bedridden. Point B. If said patient is bedridden, it thereby is admitted. Point C. If said patient is discharged, it thereby is not pregnant. Point D. If said patient is hypertensive, it thereby is bedridden. Point E. If said patient is admitted and further is anemic and further is waitlisted, it thereby is symptomatic. Point F. If said patient has a chaperone, it thereby is pregnant. Point G. If said patient is admitted and further is not anemic and further is triaged, it thereby is not symptomatic. Point H. If said patient is rescheduled and further is triaged, it thereby is not admitted. Point A is cancelled if said patient is not anemic and further is triaged. Point E supersedes Point G. Point B supersedes Point H. Point C supersedes Point F. Point A supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Xenia is not symptomatic. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031166", "pair_id": "u031166-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031166-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "adc6d9dcd74f53ce", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a10", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031168-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is not disputed. Wanda has a claim frequency of 29. Una has a premium band of 93. Una has a claim frequency of 41. Celeste is litigated. Una is not litigated. Wanda is not disputed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it is bundled. Section 2: a policyholder is bundled provided that it has a premium band of 14 or higher. Section 3: a policyholder has a premium discount provided that it has a premium band of 34 or lower. Section 4: a policyholder has a dashcam provided that it has a deductible waiver. Section 5: a policyholder has no dashcam provided that it has a deductible waiver. Section 6: a policyholder is not a claimant provided that it is litigated. Section 7: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it has a claim frequency of 30 or higher. Section 7 lapses for a policyholder if it is litigated. Section 5 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium band of 73 or lower. Section 4 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium band exceeding 73. Section 5 lapses for a policyholder if it is disputed. Section 6 lapses for a policyholder if it is litigated. Question: Una has a dashcam. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031168", "pair_id": "u031168-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031168-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "02eac4941ec1d5d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031168-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is not disputed. Wanda has a claim frequency of 29. Una has a premium band of 32. Una has a claim frequency of 41. Celeste is litigated. Una is not litigated. Wanda is not disputed.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has a deductible waiver provided that it is bundled. Section 2: a policyholder is bundled provided that it has a premium band of 14 or higher. Section 3: a policyholder has a premium discount provided that it has a premium band of 34 or lower. Section 4: a policyholder has a dashcam provided that it has a deductible waiver. Section 5: a policyholder has no dashcam provided that it has a deductible waiver. Section 6: a policyholder is not a claimant provided that it is litigated. Section 7: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it has a claim frequency of 30 or higher. Section 7 lapses for a policyholder if it is litigated. Section 5 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium band of 73 or lower. Section 4 lapses for a policyholder if it has a premium band exceeding 73. Section 5 lapses for a policyholder if it is disputed. Section 6 lapses for a policyholder if it is litigated. Question: Una has a dashcam. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031168", "pair_id": "u031168-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031168-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "03bb31694a6e45fc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031168-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is not disputed. Wanda has a claim frequency of 29. Una has a premium band of 93. Una has a claim frequency of 41. Celeste is litigated. Una is not litigated. Wanda is not disputed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is bundled, it then has a deductible waiver. #2 Each time a policyholder has a premium band of 14 or above, it then is bundled. #3 Each time a policyholder has a premium band of 34 or below, it then has a premium discount. #4 Each time a policyholder has a deductible waiver, it then has a dashcam. #5 Each time a policyholder has a deductible waiver, it then has no dashcam. #6 Each time a policyholder is litigated, it then is not a claimant. #7 Each time a policyholder has a claim frequency of 30 or above, it then has flood coverage. #7 is set aside if a policyholder is litigated. #5 is set aside if a policyholder has a premium band of 73 or below. #4 is set aside if a policyholder has a premium band greater than 73. #5 is set aside if a policyholder is disputed. #6 is set aside if a policyholder is litigated. Question: Do the terms above show that Una has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031168", "pair_id": "u031168-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031168-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "02eac4941ec1d5d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031168-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is not disputed. Wanda has a claim frequency of 29. Una has a premium band of 32. Una has a claim frequency of 41. Celeste is litigated. Una is not litigated. Wanda is not disputed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is bundled, it then has a deductible waiver. #2 Each time a policyholder has a premium band of 14 or above, it then is bundled. #3 Each time a policyholder has a premium band of 34 or below, it then has a premium discount. #4 Each time a policyholder has a deductible waiver, it then has a dashcam. #5 Each time a policyholder has a deductible waiver, it then has no dashcam. #6 Each time a policyholder is litigated, it then is not a claimant. #7 Each time a policyholder has a claim frequency of 30 or above, it then has flood coverage. #7 is set aside if a policyholder is litigated. #5 is set aside if a policyholder has a premium band of 73 or below. #4 is set aside if a policyholder has a premium band greater than 73. #5 is set aside if a policyholder is disputed. #6 is set aside if a policyholder is litigated. Question: Do the terms above show that Una has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031168", "pair_id": "u031168-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031168-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "03bb31694a6e45fc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031207-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is bundled. Xaver is bundled. Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has a payout ceiling of 12. Xaver is not indemnified.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is not indemnified, it also is not a smoker. Clause 2: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also is lapsed. Clause 3: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling over 33, it also is not lapsed. Clause 4: once any policyholder is indemnified, it also has a dashcam. Clause 5: once any policyholder is not indemnified, it also has no dashcam. Clause 4 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is not bundled. Clause 5 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a payout ceiling of 52 or less. Clause 4 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a payout ceiling over 52. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is indemnified. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Clause 3 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Xaver has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031207", "pair_id": "u031207-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031207-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "783499e01aad7df3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031207-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Viggo is bundled. Xaver is bundled. Viggo is indemnified. Viggo has a payout ceiling of 12. Xaver is not indemnified.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is not indemnified, it also is not a smoker. Clause 2: once any policyholder has roadside assistance, it also is lapsed. Clause 3: once any policyholder has a payout ceiling over 33, it also is not lapsed. Clause 4: once any policyholder is indemnified, it also has a dashcam. Clause 5: once any policyholder is indemnified, it also has no dashcam. Clause 4 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is not bundled. Clause 5 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a payout ceiling of 52 or less. Clause 4 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder has a payout ceiling over 52. Clause 2 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is indemnified. Clause 5 overrides Clause 4. Clause 3 overrides Clause 2. Question: Does it follow that Xaver has a dashcam?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031207", "pair_id": "u031207-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031207-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e92f6a7421857461", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031210-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar has a pulse rate of 87. Wendel has a pain level of 27. Zora has a pulse rate of 55. Zora has a pacemaker. Zora has a pain level of 70. Gunnar has a pain level of 6. Wendel has a pulse rate of 92. Gunnar is not diabetic. Zora has no chaperone. Zora is postoperative. Gunnar has a chaperone. Zora is not diabetic. Wendel has no chaperone.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a pulse rate over 44 and also is not postoperative and also has a pain level of 31 or more, it also is allergic. Clause 2: once any patient has no chaperone and also is diabetic and also has a pacemaker, it also has a caregiver. Clause 3: once any patient is allergic, it also is asthmatic. Clause 4: once any patient has a pulse rate over 44 and also is not postoperative and also is not diabetic, it also is not allergic. Clause 5: once any patient is postoperative and also has a chaperone, it also has an interpreter. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient is postoperative. Clause 3 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a chaperone. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a pulse rate over 68 and also is diabetic. Question: Does it follow that Zora is allergic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031210", "pair_id": "u031210-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031210-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d20ee9386e83aedc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031210-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gunnar has a pulse rate of 87. Wendel has a pain level of 27. Zora has a pulse rate of 55. Zora has a pacemaker. Zora has a pain level of 70. Gunnar has a pain level of 6. Wendel has a pulse rate of 92. Gunnar is not diabetic. Zora has no chaperone. Zora is postoperative. Gunnar has a chaperone. Zora is not diabetic. Wendel has no chaperone.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any patient has a pulse rate over 44 and also is not postoperative and also has a pain level of 31 or more, it also is allergic. Clause 2: once any patient has no chaperone and also is diabetic and also has a pacemaker, it also has a caregiver. Clause 3: once any patient is allergic, it also is asthmatic. Clause 4: once any patient has a pulse rate over 44 and also is postoperative and also is not diabetic, it also is not allergic. Clause 5: once any patient is postoperative and also has a chaperone, it also has an interpreter. Clause 2 does not hold for a patient when any patient is postoperative. Clause 3 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a chaperone. Clause 4 does not hold for a patient when any patient has a pulse rate over 68 and also is diabetic. Question: Does it follow that Zora is allergic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031210", "pair_id": "u031210-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/1/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031210-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e8e85693fca449e9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031238-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is not discharged. Aurel has no caregiver. Benedek is rescheduled. Benedek is ambulatory. Gunnar has no caregiver. Aurel is not discharged. Aurel is rescheduled. Aurel is bedridden. Benedek is not bedridden. Gunnar is not discharged. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Yusuf is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has an interpreter, it then is postoperative. #2 Each time a patient is postoperative, it then is not waitlisted. #3 Each time a patient is postoperative, it then is waitlisted. #4 Each time a patient is allergic, it then is not postoperative. #5 Each time a patient is not bedridden, it then is allergic. #6 Each time a patient has a caregiver, it then is not anemic. #7 Each time a patient is not discharged, it then has an interpreter. #8 Each time a patient is discharged, it then has no interpreter. #6 is set aside if a patient has no caregiver. #1 is set aside if a patient is not ambulatory. #3 is set aside if a patient is rescheduled. #2 is set aside if a patient is not rescheduled. #8 yields to #7. #1 yields to #4. #3 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Gunnar is not waitlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031238", "pair_id": "u031238-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031238-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "3b94fb573f12fe10", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031238-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Benedek is not discharged. Aurel has no caregiver. Benedek is rescheduled. Benedek is ambulatory. Gunnar has a caregiver. Aurel is not discharged. Aurel is rescheduled. Aurel is bedridden. Benedek is not bedridden. Gunnar is not discharged. Yusuf is not rescheduled. Yusuf is not ambulatory.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has an interpreter, it then is postoperative. #2 Each time a patient is postoperative, it then is not waitlisted. #3 Each time a patient is postoperative, it then is waitlisted. #4 Each time a patient is allergic, it then is not postoperative. #5 Each time a patient is not bedridden, it then is allergic. #6 Each time a patient has a caregiver, it then is not anemic. #7 Each time a patient is not discharged, it then has an interpreter. #8 Each time a patient is discharged, it then has no interpreter. #6 is set aside if a patient has no caregiver. #1 is set aside if a patient is not ambulatory. #3 is set aside if a patient is rescheduled. #2 is set aside if a patient is not rescheduled. #8 yields to #7. #1 yields to #4. #3 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Gunnar is not waitlisted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031238", "pair_id": "u031238-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031238-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "598a0ee0028c9f31", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031245-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sigrid is licensed. Kalle has no diploma. Kalle is licensed. Ivo is licensed. Ivo has no diploma.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has a diploma, thus it is not sponsored. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a portfolio, thus it is a veteran. Provision 3: when the candidate here is not licensed, thus it is seasoned. Provision 4: when the candidate here has no diploma, thus it has a portfolio. Provision 5: when the candidate here is not a graduate, thus it is bonded. Provision 6: when the candidate here is unionized, thus it is not a graduate. Provision 7: when the candidate here is not sponsored, thus it is relocating. Question: Which one describes Kalle?", "options": ["is relocating", "is a veteran", "is bonded"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is a veteran", "unit_id": "u031245", "pair_id": "u031245-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031245-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "eba818797c018951", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a7", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031245-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Sigrid is licensed. Kalle has a diploma. Kalle is licensed. Ivo is licensed. Ivo has no diploma.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the candidate here has a diploma, thus it is not sponsored. Provision 2: when the candidate here has a portfolio, thus it is a veteran. Provision 3: when the candidate here is not licensed, thus it is seasoned. Provision 4: when the candidate here has no diploma, thus it has a portfolio. Provision 5: when the candidate here is not a graduate, thus it is bonded. Provision 6: when the candidate here is unionized, thus it is not a graduate. Provision 7: when the candidate here is not sponsored, thus it is relocating. Question: Which one describes Kalle?", "options": ["is relocating", "is a veteran", "is bonded"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is relocating", "unit_id": "u031245", "pair_id": "u031245-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031245-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "b88e368199ac2d23", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a1", "a7", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031250-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is stamped. Kaveh is palletized. Priya has a courier. Priya has a barcode. Priya is palletized. Priya is not prepaid.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not scanned, it thereby is not weighed. Point B. If said parcel has a barcode and further is palletized and further is not prepaid, it thereby is refrigerated. Point C. If said parcel is prepaid, it thereby is tracked. Point D. If said parcel has no courier, it thereby is not tracked. Point E. If said parcel has a barcode and further is stamped, it thereby is not refrigerated. Point B supersedes Point E. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Priya is refrigerated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031250", "pair_id": "u031250-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031250-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a0bb31201992a062", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031250-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is stamped. Kaveh is palletized. Priya has no courier. Priya has a barcode. Priya is palletized. Priya is not prepaid.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is not scanned, it thereby is not weighed. Point B. If said parcel has a barcode and further is palletized and further is not prepaid, it thereby is refrigerated. Point C. If said parcel is prepaid, it thereby is tracked. Point D. If said parcel has no courier, it thereby is not tracked. Point E. If said parcel has a barcode and further is stamped, it thereby is not refrigerated. Point B supersedes Point E. Point C supersedes Point D. Question: Statement: Priya is refrigerated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031250", "pair_id": "u031250-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031250-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2a7f201d617b97cb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031250-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is stamped. Kaveh is palletized. Priya has a courier. Priya has a barcode. Priya is palletized. Priya is not prepaid.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is not scanned, so it is not weighed. No. 2 While the given parcel has a barcode and likewise is palletized and likewise is not prepaid, so it is refrigerated. No. 3 While the given parcel is prepaid, so it is tracked. No. 4 While the given parcel has no courier, so it is not tracked. No. 5 While the given parcel has a barcode and likewise is stamped, so it is not refrigerated. No. 2 wins over No. 5. No. 3 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Priya is refrigerated\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031250", "pair_id": "u031250-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031250-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a0bb31201992a062", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031250-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is stamped. Kaveh is palletized. Priya has no courier. Priya has a barcode. Priya is palletized. Priya is not prepaid.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is not scanned, so it is not weighed. No. 2 While the given parcel has a barcode and likewise is palletized and likewise is not prepaid, so it is refrigerated. No. 3 While the given parcel is prepaid, so it is tracked. No. 4 While the given parcel has no courier, so it is not tracked. No. 5 While the given parcel has a barcode and likewise is stamped, so it is not refrigerated. No. 2 wins over No. 5. No. 3 wins over No. 4. Question: Is the claim \"Priya is refrigerated\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031250", "pair_id": "u031250-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031250-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2a7f201d617b97cb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031311-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is theoretical. Fomalhaut is peer reviewed. Fomalhaut is not budgeted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is not renewed provided that it has seed funding. Section 2: a proposal is not resubmitted provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 3: a proposal is renewed provided that it is theoretical. Section 4: a proposal is resubmitted provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 4 lapses for a proposal if it is theoretical. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it is budgeted. Section 4 lapses for a proposal if it is theoretical. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it is budgeted. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Fomalhaut is resubmitted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031311", "pair_id": "u031311-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031311-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "afda7fe7fae2a1a2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u031311-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is theoretical. Fomalhaut is not peer reviewed. Fomalhaut is not budgeted.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is not renewed provided that it has seed funding. Section 2: a proposal is not resubmitted provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 3: a proposal is renewed provided that it is theoretical. Section 4: a proposal is resubmitted provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 4 lapses for a proposal if it is theoretical. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it is budgeted. Section 4 lapses for a proposal if it is theoretical. Section 2 lapses for a proposal if it is budgeted. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 2 takes precedence over Section 4. Question: Fomalhaut is resubmitted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031311", "pair_id": "u031311-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031311-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "07939ebc9b919933", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u031311-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is theoretical. Fomalhaut is peer reviewed. Fomalhaut is not budgeted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is not renewed. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed: then it is not resubmitted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it is renewed. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed: then it is resubmitted. Policy IV is waived if that proposal is theoretical. Policy II is waived if that proposal is budgeted. Policy IV is waived if that proposal is theoretical. Policy II is waived if that proposal is budgeted. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. Question: Is it so that Fomalhaut is resubmitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031311", "pair_id": "u031311-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031311-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "afda7fe7fae2a1a2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u031311-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is theoretical. Fomalhaut is not peer reviewed. Fomalhaut is not budgeted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal has seed funding: then it is not renewed. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed: then it is not resubmitted. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it is renewed. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is peer reviewed: then it is resubmitted. Policy IV is waived if that proposal is theoretical. Policy II is waived if that proposal is budgeted. Policy IV is waived if that proposal is theoretical. Policy II is waived if that proposal is budgeted. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy II beats Policy IV. Question: Is it so that Fomalhaut is resubmitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031311", "pair_id": "u031311-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031311-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "07939ebc9b919933", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u031311-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is theoretical. Fomalhaut is peer reviewed. Fomalhaut is not budgeted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has seed funding, it then is not renewed. #2 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then is not resubmitted. #3 Each time a proposal is theoretical, it then is renewed. #4 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then is resubmitted. #4 is set aside if a proposal is theoretical. #2 is set aside if a proposal is budgeted. #4 is set aside if a proposal is theoretical. #2 is set aside if a proposal is budgeted. #1 yields to #3. #4 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Fomalhaut is resubmitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031311", "pair_id": "u031311-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031311-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "afda7fe7fae2a1a2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u031311-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut is theoretical. Fomalhaut is not peer reviewed. Fomalhaut is not budgeted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has seed funding, it then is not renewed. #2 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then is not resubmitted. #3 Each time a proposal is theoretical, it then is renewed. #4 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then is resubmitted. #4 is set aside if a proposal is theoretical. #2 is set aside if a proposal is budgeted. #4 is set aside if a proposal is theoretical. #2 is set aside if a proposal is budgeted. #1 yields to #3. #4 yields to #2. Question: Do the terms above show that Fomalhaut is resubmitted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031311", "pair_id": "u031311-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031311-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "07939ebc9b919933", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u031327-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata has a premium band of 54. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 75. Agata is not grandfathered. Fabian has a peril factor of 65. Agata has a peril factor of 65. Agata has a claim frequency of 60. Fabian has a premium band of 38. Agata has a deductible waiver. Agata is not reinstated. Fabian is grandfathered. Agata has a payout ceiling of 19.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is not grandfathered and further has a payout ceiling of maximum 18, it thereby is indemnified. Point B. If said policyholder is reimbursed and further has a premium band in excess of 17, it thereby is lapsed. Point C. If said policyholder has a claim frequency of maximum 45 and further has a peril factor of minimum 10, it thereby is a claimant. Point D. If said policyholder is not grandfathered and further has a payout ceiling in excess of 31, it thereby is not indemnified. Point E. If said policyholder is not reinstated, it thereby is a smoker. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder has a payout ceiling of maximum 16 and further is not retired. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder has a premium band in excess of 65. Point C is cancelled if said policyholder has a deductible waiver. Question: Statement: Agata is indemnified. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031327", "pair_id": "u031327-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031327-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3569e7413472f0bd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031327-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Agata has a premium band of 54. Fabian has a payout ceiling of 75. Agata is not grandfathered. Fabian has a peril factor of 65. Agata has a peril factor of 65. Agata has a claim frequency of 60. Fabian has a premium band of 38. Agata has a deductible waiver. Agata is not reinstated. Fabian is grandfathered. Agata has a payout ceiling of 19.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder is not grandfathered and further has a payout ceiling of maximum 31, it thereby is indemnified. Point B. If said policyholder is reimbursed and further has a premium band in excess of 17, it thereby is lapsed. Point C. If said policyholder has a claim frequency of maximum 45 and further has a peril factor of minimum 10, it thereby is a claimant. Point D. If said policyholder is not grandfathered and further has a payout ceiling in excess of 31, it thereby is not indemnified. Point E. If said policyholder is not reinstated, it thereby is a smoker. Point D is cancelled if said policyholder has a payout ceiling of maximum 16 and further is not retired. Point E is cancelled if said policyholder has a premium band in excess of 65. Point C is cancelled if said policyholder has a deductible waiver. Question: Statement: Agata is indemnified. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031327", "pair_id": "u031327-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031327-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c6eb967d539322af", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031347-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is not bundled. Agata has a peril factor of 30. Wanda has a peril factor of 28. Wanda has no roadside assistance. Edda is not subrogated. Agata is not lapsed. Wanda is lapsed. Wanda is subrogated. Wanda is disputed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is subrogated and additionally has a peril factor of 81 or above and additionally is lapsed, it then is a claimant. #2 Each time a policyholder has a peril factor of 42 or above, it then is a smoker. #3 Each time a policyholder has roadside assistance, it then has no rider. #4 Each time a policyholder is disputed and additionally has roadside assistance, it then is not a smoker. #5 Each time a policyholder is subrogated and additionally has a peril factor less than 27, it then is not a claimant. #6 Each time a policyholder has a peril factor greater than 21 and additionally is bundled, it then has a rider. #2 yields to #4. #6 yields to #3. #1 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Wanda is a claimant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031347", "pair_id": "u031347-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031347-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "602895cecfbe6ab3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031347-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wanda is not bundled. Agata has a peril factor of 30. Wanda has a peril factor of 28. Wanda has no roadside assistance. Edda is not subrogated. Agata is not lapsed. Wanda is lapsed. Wanda is subrogated. Wanda is disputed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is subrogated and additionally has a peril factor of 81 or above and additionally is lapsed, it then is a claimant. #2 Each time a policyholder has a peril factor of 42 or above, it then is a smoker. #3 Each time a policyholder has roadside assistance, it then has no rider. #4 Each time a policyholder is disputed and additionally has roadside assistance, it then is not a smoker. #5 Each time a policyholder is subrogated and additionally has a peril factor less than 81, it then is not a claimant. #6 Each time a policyholder has a peril factor greater than 21 and additionally is bundled, it then has a rider. #2 yields to #4. #6 yields to #3. #1 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Wanda is a claimant?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031347", "pair_id": "u031347-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031347-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0569bfd68781dc04", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031359-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar is not a pilot study. Izar is not embargoed. Izar has ethics clearance. Izar is collaborative. Izar is endorsed. Izar is not interdisciplinary. Izar has no steering committee.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is not collaborative, it then has no industry backing. #2 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is longitudinal. #3 Each time a proposal is endorsed, it then is not longitudinal. #4 Each time a proposal has no steering committee, it then is multicenter. #5 Each time a proposal is not a pilot study, it then is shortlisted. #6 Each time a proposal is interdisciplinary, it then is budgeted. #7 Each time a proposal has seed funding, it then is not shortlisted. #8 Each time a proposal is not collaborative, it then has a field site. #9 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is not exploratory. #10 Each time a proposal has no seed funding, it then has industry backing. #11 Each time a proposal is embargoed, it then is exploratory. #12 Each time a proposal has a steering committee, it then has a postdoc. #5 is set aside if a proposal has ethics clearance. #10 yields to #1. #7 yields to #5. #11 yields to #9. #3 yields to #2. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Izar?", "options": ["is shortlisted", "has a field site", "is longitudinal", "has industry backing", "has a postdoc", "is multicenter", "is exploratory"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is multicenter", "unit_id": "u031359", "pair_id": "u031359-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031359-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4ac868fe7041001e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a9", "a5", "a0", "a16", "a3", "a12"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031359-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar is not a pilot study. Izar is not embargoed. Izar has ethics clearance. Izar is collaborative. Izar is endorsed. Izar is not interdisciplinary. Izar has a steering committee.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is not collaborative, it then has no industry backing. #2 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is longitudinal. #3 Each time a proposal is endorsed, it then is not longitudinal. #4 Each time a proposal has no steering committee, it then is multicenter. #5 Each time a proposal is not a pilot study, it then is shortlisted. #6 Each time a proposal is interdisciplinary, it then is budgeted. #7 Each time a proposal has seed funding, it then is not shortlisted. #8 Each time a proposal is not collaborative, it then has a field site. #9 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is not exploratory. #10 Each time a proposal has no seed funding, it then has industry backing. #11 Each time a proposal is embargoed, it then is exploratory. #12 Each time a proposal has a steering committee, it then has a postdoc. #5 is set aside if a proposal has ethics clearance. #10 yields to #1. #7 yields to #5. #11 yields to #9. #3 yields to #2. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Izar?", "options": ["is shortlisted", "has a field site", "is longitudinal", "has industry backing", "has a postdoc", "is multicenter", "is exploratory"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a postdoc", "unit_id": "u031359", "pair_id": "u031359-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031359-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0c5194b1e5db998f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a9", "a5", "a0", "a16", "a3", "a12"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031448-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is minified. Pumice is tested. Obsidian is minified. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Pumice has no feature toggle. Pumice is benchmarked. Basalt is localized. Basalt is compiled. Obsidian has a changelog. Pumice is not versioned. Obsidian has no migration script. Obsidian is not compiled. Basalt has a changelog. Basalt has no migration script. Basalt is not versioned. Basalt is not merged. Basalt is not benchmarked. Obsidian is tested. Obsidian is not documented. Pumice is not compiled. Obsidian is localized. Obsidian is merged. Obsidian is obsolete. Obsidian has a feature toggle.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a changelog plus is benchmarked: then it is reproducible. Policy II. Suppose that build is notarized plus is documented: then it is not fuzzed. Policy III. Suppose that build is tested plus has a feature toggle: then it is not profiled. Policy IV. Suppose that build is flaky plus has a migration script plus is merged: then it is notarized. Policy V. Suppose that build is notarized plus is localized plus is merged: then it is fuzzed. Policy VI. Suppose that build is merged plus is versioned: then it is backported. Policy VII. Suppose that build has a migration script plus is minified: then it is flaky. Policy VI is waived if that build is obsolete. Policy II is waived if that build is compiled plus is experimental. Policy I is waived if that build has a migration script. Question: Is it so that Obsidian is not fuzzed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031448", "pair_id": "u031448-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031448-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3d9496dad140ca73", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a16", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031448-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is minified. Pumice is tested. Obsidian is minified. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Pumice has no feature toggle. Pumice is benchmarked. Basalt is localized. Basalt is compiled. Obsidian has a changelog. Pumice is not versioned. Obsidian has a migration script. Obsidian is not compiled. Basalt has a changelog. Basalt has no migration script. Basalt is not versioned. Basalt is not merged. Basalt is not benchmarked. Obsidian is tested. Obsidian is not documented. Pumice is not compiled. Obsidian is localized. Obsidian is merged. Obsidian is obsolete. Obsidian has a feature toggle.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build has a changelog plus is benchmarked: then it is reproducible. Policy II. Suppose that build is notarized plus is documented: then it is not fuzzed. Policy III. Suppose that build is tested plus has a feature toggle: then it is not profiled. Policy IV. Suppose that build is flaky plus has a migration script plus is merged: then it is notarized. Policy V. Suppose that build is notarized plus is localized plus is merged: then it is fuzzed. Policy VI. Suppose that build is merged plus is versioned: then it is backported. Policy VII. Suppose that build has a migration script plus is minified: then it is flaky. Policy VI is waived if that build is obsolete. Policy II is waived if that build is compiled plus is experimental. Policy I is waived if that build has a migration script. Question: Is it so that Obsidian is not fuzzed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031448", "pair_id": "u031448-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/10/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031448-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fd0c7b09c5373ab8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a16", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031472-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is not stateless. Quasar is not stateless. Juno is provisioned. Juno is idle. Quasar has no GPU. Borealis is not idle. Juno is stateless. Juno has a GPU. Borealis is not containerized. Quasar is cached. Borealis is cached. Juno is not cached. Borealis has a GPU. Quasar is not idle.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is provisioned, then it is mirrored. (2) If a workload is not containerized, then it is deprecated. (3) If a workload has a GPU and is not cached and is not idle, then it is not autoscaled. (4) If a workload is throttled and is stateless and is not backed up, then it has a dedicated host. (5) If a workload is throttled and is not stateless and is cached, then it has no dedicated host. (6) If a workload has a GPU and is stateless, then it is not backed up. (7) If a workload is not sharded, then it is throttled. (8) If a workload has a GPU, then it is not sharded. Question: Is it true that Borealis has a dedicated host?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031472", "pair_id": "u031472-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031472-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "3f3b74969c1a8e49", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031472-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is not stateless. Quasar is not stateless. Juno is provisioned. Juno is idle. Quasar has no GPU. Borealis is not idle. Juno is stateless. Juno has a GPU. Borealis is containerized. Quasar is cached. Borealis is cached. Juno is not cached. Borealis has a GPU. Quasar is not idle.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is provisioned, then it is mirrored. (2) If a workload is not containerized, then it is deprecated. (3) If a workload has a GPU and is not cached and is not idle, then it is not autoscaled. (4) If a workload is throttled and is stateless and is not backed up, then it has a dedicated host. (5) If a workload is throttled and is not stateless and is cached, then it has no dedicated host. (6) If a workload has a GPU and is stateless, then it is not backed up. (7) If a workload is not sharded, then it is throttled. (8) If a workload has a GPU, then it is not sharded. Question: Is it true that Borealis has a dedicated host?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031472", "pair_id": "u031472-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031472-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "2357f923bfc9dbe7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031472-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is not stateless. Quasar is not stateless. Juno is provisioned. Juno is idle. Quasar has no GPU. Borealis is not idle. Juno is stateless. Juno has a GPU. Borealis is not containerized. Quasar is cached. Borealis is cached. Juno is not cached. Borealis has a GPU. Quasar is not idle.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is provisioned, it also is mirrored. Clause 2: once any workload is not containerized, it also is deprecated. Clause 3: once any workload has a GPU and also is not cached and also is not idle, it also is not autoscaled. Clause 4: once any workload is throttled and also is stateless and also is not backed up, it also has a dedicated host. Clause 5: once any workload is throttled and also is not stateless and also is cached, it also has no dedicated host. Clause 6: once any workload has a GPU and also is stateless, it also is not backed up. Clause 7: once any workload is not sharded, it also is throttled. Clause 8: once any workload has a GPU, it also is not sharded. Question: Does it follow that Borealis has a dedicated host?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031472", "pair_id": "u031472-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031472-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "3f3b74969c1a8e49", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031472-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is not stateless. Quasar is not stateless. Juno is provisioned. Juno is idle. Quasar has no GPU. Borealis is not idle. Juno is stateless. Juno has a GPU. Borealis is containerized. Quasar is cached. Borealis is cached. Juno is not cached. Borealis has a GPU. Quasar is not idle.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is provisioned, it also is mirrored. Clause 2: once any workload is not containerized, it also is deprecated. Clause 3: once any workload has a GPU and also is not cached and also is not idle, it also is not autoscaled. Clause 4: once any workload is throttled and also is stateless and also is not backed up, it also has a dedicated host. Clause 5: once any workload is throttled and also is not stateless and also is cached, it also has no dedicated host. Clause 6: once any workload has a GPU and also is stateless, it also is not backed up. Clause 7: once any workload is not sharded, it also is throttled. Clause 8: once any workload has a GPU, it also is not sharded. Question: Does it follow that Borealis has a dedicated host?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031472", "pair_id": "u031472-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031472-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "2357f923bfc9dbe7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031486-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny has a risk tier of 71. Dagny is garnished.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a risk tier over 71, it also is employed. Clause 2: once any borrower is garnished, it also is foreclosed. Clause 3: once any borrower has collateral, it also is not indebted. Clause 4: once any borrower is garnished, it also is not solvent. Clause 5: once any borrower is garnished, it also is solvent. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has collateral. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a risk tier of 27 or more. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a risk tier over 40. Clause 4 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a risk tier under 27. Question: Does it follow that Dagny is solvent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031486", "pair_id": "u031486-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031486-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "48d333d1747b199b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u031486-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny has a risk tier of 97. Dagny is garnished.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a risk tier over 71, it also is employed. Clause 2: once any borrower is garnished, it also is foreclosed. Clause 3: once any borrower has collateral, it also is not indebted. Clause 4: once any borrower is garnished, it also is not solvent. Clause 5: once any borrower is garnished, it also is solvent. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has collateral. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a risk tier of 27 or more. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a risk tier over 40. Clause 4 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a risk tier under 27. Question: Does it follow that Dagny is solvent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031486", "pair_id": "u031486-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031486-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "afe62d32d07a8b05", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u031508-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin has a weight class of 64. Mirela is not stamped. Quentin has a parcel volume of 84. Odile has a delivery window of 53. Mirela has a delivery window of 86. Priya has a delivery window of 85. Odile has a weight class of 94. Priya has a weight class of 94. Odile has a parcel volume of 70. Quentin has a delivery window of 97.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel has a delivery window of more than 82, that parcel has no barcode. Item B. When the parcel is not stamped, that parcel is labeled. Item C. When the parcel has a delivery window of more than 82, that parcel has a barcode. Item D. When the parcel has a delivery window of more than 87, that parcel is not labeled. Item C is suspended when the parcel has a weight class of no less than 42. Item A is suspended when the parcel has a weight class of less than 42. Item B is suspended when the parcel has a weight class of no more than 65. Item A is suspended when the parcel has a parcel volume of less than 59. Item B outranks Item D. Item C outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Priya has a barcode?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031508", "pair_id": "u031508-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031508-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "448fd951b97a73d7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031508-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin has a weight class of 64. Mirela is not stamped. Quentin has a parcel volume of 84. Odile has a delivery window of 53. Mirela has a delivery window of 86. Priya has a delivery window of 85. Odile has a weight class of 94. Priya has a weight class of 94. Odile has a parcel volume of 70. Quentin has a delivery window of 97.", "instruction": "Item A. When the parcel has a delivery window of more than 82, that parcel has no barcode. Item B. When the parcel is not stamped, that parcel is labeled. Item C. When the parcel has a delivery window of more than 82, that parcel has a barcode. Item D. When the parcel has a delivery window of more than 40, that parcel is not labeled. Item C is suspended when the parcel has a weight class of no less than 42. Item A is suspended when the parcel has a weight class of less than 42. Item B is suspended when the parcel has a weight class of no more than 65. Item A is suspended when the parcel has a parcel volume of less than 59. Item B outranks Item D. Item C outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Priya has a barcode?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031508", "pair_id": "u031508-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031508-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "88dc323a0b57fd9e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031523-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut has ethics clearance. Nashira is interdisciplinary. Izar has seed funding. Nashira has a postdoc. Betelgeuse has a postdoc. Betelgeuse has no ethics clearance. Betelgeuse is renewed. Izar is translational. Nashira is translational. Izar has ethics clearance. Betelgeuse is not interdisciplinary. Nashira has no patent filing. Nashira is renewed. Nashira is not exploratory. Nashira has seed funding. Fomalhaut is not renewed. Izar has no patent filing. Fomalhaut has no patent filing. Betelgeuse has no patent filing.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is resubmitted provided that it has industry backing as well as is translational as well as has seed funding. Section 2: a proposal is preregistered provided that it has a patent filing. Section 3: a proposal is not resubmitted provided that it has industry backing as well as has a patent filing as well as is collaborative. Section 4: a proposal is embargoed provided that it has a postdoc. Section 5: a proposal is collaborative provided that it has ethics clearance as well as is exploratory. Section 6: a proposal has industry backing provided that it is renewed. Question: Nashira is resubmitted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031523", "pair_id": "u031523-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031523-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "1d431b68bf0a75a4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031523-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Fomalhaut has ethics clearance. Nashira is interdisciplinary. Izar has seed funding. Nashira has a postdoc. Betelgeuse has a postdoc. Betelgeuse has no ethics clearance. Betelgeuse is renewed. Izar is translational. Nashira is translational. Izar has ethics clearance. Betelgeuse is not interdisciplinary. Nashira has no patent filing. Nashira is renewed. Nashira is not exploratory. Nashira has seed funding. Fomalhaut is not renewed. Izar has no patent filing. Fomalhaut has no patent filing. Betelgeuse has no patent filing.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal is resubmitted provided that it has industry backing as well as is translational as well as has seed funding. Section 2: a proposal is preregistered provided that it has a patent filing. Section 3: a proposal is not resubmitted provided that it has industry backing as well as has a patent filing as well as is collaborative. Section 4: a proposal is not cofunded provided that it is interdisciplinary. Section 5: a proposal is embargoed provided that it has a postdoc. Section 6: a proposal is collaborative provided that it has ethics clearance as well as is exploratory. Section 7: a proposal has industry backing provided that it is renewed. Question: Nashira is resubmitted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031523", "pair_id": "u031523-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031523-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "f629de4b850c7c43", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031549-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is not a veteran. Petra is not fingerprinted. Petra has a diploma. Petra is bonded. Petra has a mentor. Petra is sponsored. Petra is seasoned. Petra is not eligible.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is recommended, and has a mentor, and is bilingual, that candidate is licensed. Item B. When the candidate is a graduate, that candidate is not unionized. Item C. When the candidate has a mentor, that candidate has a signing bonus. Item D. When the candidate is recommended, and is sponsored, and is seasoned, that candidate is not licensed. Item E. When the candidate is a graduate, and is fingerprinted, that candidate is not onboarded. Item F. When the candidate is bonded, that candidate has a background screening. Item G. When the candidate is seasoned, and is a veteran, that candidate is unionized. Item H. When the candidate is not eligible, that candidate is bilingual. Item I. When the candidate has a signing bonus, and has a diploma, and has a mentor, that candidate is recommended. Item J. When the candidate is bonded, and is sponsored, and has a mentor, that candidate is not recommended. Item I is suspended when the candidate is certified, and is sponsored. Item G is suspended when the candidate has a mentor. Item I outranks Item J. Item A outranks Item D. Item G outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Petra is licensed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031549", "pair_id": "u031549-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031549-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a40402fecb67833c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031549-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Petra is not a veteran. Petra is not fingerprinted. Petra has a diploma. Petra is bonded. Petra has a mentor. Petra is sponsored. Petra is seasoned. Petra is not eligible.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is recommended, and has a mentor, and is bilingual, that candidate is licensed. Item B. When the candidate is a graduate, that candidate is not unionized. Item C. When the candidate has a mentor, that candidate has a signing bonus. Item D. When the candidate is recommended, and is sponsored, and is seasoned, that candidate is not licensed. Item E. When the candidate is a graduate, and is fingerprinted, that candidate is not onboarded. Item F. When the candidate is bonded, that candidate has a background screening. Item G. When the candidate is seasoned, and is a veteran, that candidate is unionized. Item H. When the candidate is eligible, that candidate is bilingual. Item I. When the candidate has a signing bonus, and has a diploma, and has a mentor, that candidate is recommended. Item J. When the candidate is bonded, and is sponsored, and has a mentor, that candidate is not recommended. Item I is suspended when the candidate is certified, and is sponsored. Item G is suspended when the candidate has a mentor. Item I outranks Item J. Item A outranks Item D. Item G outranks Item B. Question: Can one infer that Petra is licensed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031549", "pair_id": "u031549-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031549-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "904e725fa93522bf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031567-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is not grandfathered. Una has a beneficiary. Una has a rider. Una has a peril factor of 87. Una has no deductible waiver. Una has a premium band of 79. Una is uninsurable.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has roadside assistance provided that it has a premium band exceeding 33 as well as is uninsurable. Section 2: a policyholder is a smoker provided that it is appraised as well as has a premium band of 66 or higher. Section 3: a policyholder is not a smoker provided that it is appraised as well as has a premium band lower than 66 as well as has roadside assistance. Section 4: a policyholder has a premium discount provided that it has no deductible waiver as well as is not uninsurable as well as has a beneficiary. Section 5: a policyholder is bundled provided that it is not grandfathered as well as has a rider. Section 6: a policyholder is appraised provided that it is bundled as well as has a peril factor of 62 or higher. Question: Una is a smoker. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031567", "pair_id": "u031567-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031567-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "68ec9ea8753b3bbb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u031567-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Una is not grandfathered. Una has a beneficiary. Una has a rider. Una has a peril factor of 87. Una has no deductible waiver. Una has a premium band of 79. Una is uninsurable.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has roadside assistance provided that it has a premium band exceeding 33 as well as is uninsurable. Section 2: a policyholder is a smoker provided that it is appraised as well as has a premium band of 66 or higher. Section 3: a policyholder is not a smoker provided that it is appraised as well as has a premium band lower than 66 as well as has roadside assistance. Section 4: a policyholder has a premium discount provided that it has no deductible waiver as well as is not uninsurable as well as has a beneficiary. Section 5: a policyholder is bundled provided that it is grandfathered as well as has a rider. Section 6: a policyholder is appraised provided that it is bundled as well as has a peril factor of 62 or higher. Question: Una is a smoker. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031567", "pair_id": "u031567-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031567-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "e5236bd2d7b3944e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u031596-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kestrel is sharded. Tundra has a firewall. Kestrel has a firewall. Kestrel is throttled. Kestrel is cached. Kestrel is not virtualized. Kestrel is not containerized. Halcyon has a GPU. Kestrel has a GPU. Halcyon is not containerized. Halcyon is virtualized. Tundra has no GPU. Tundra is not virtualized. Tundra is not sharded. Halcyon has no firewall. Halcyon is cached. Halcyon is not sharded.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is not sharded and is containerized, then it is provisioned. (2) If a workload has a GPU and has no firewall, then it is patched. (3) If a workload is throttled, then it is not provisioned. (4) If a workload is not containerized and is cached, then it has no snapshot. (5) If a workload is cached, then it is replicated. (6) If a workload has a GPU and is not mirrored, then it is sandboxed. (7) If a workload has a GPU and has a firewall, then it is encrypted. (8) If a workload has a GPU and is mirrored and is virtualized, then it is isolated. (9) If a workload has a GPU and is not idle and is not virtualized, then it has a public endpoint. (10) If a workload has a GPU, then it has a snapshot. (11) If a workload has a GPU and is idle, then it has a failover node. When (3) and (1) clash, (3) prevails. When (10) and (4) clash, (10) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Kestrel?", "options": ["is encrypted", "is patched", "has a failover node", "is sandboxed", "is isolated", "has a public endpoint"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is encrypted", "unit_id": "u031596", "pair_id": "u031596-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031596-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0e5fd30bc7df1308", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a4", "a2", "a13", "a16", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031596-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kestrel is sharded. Tundra has a firewall. Kestrel has a firewall. Kestrel is throttled. Kestrel is not cached. Kestrel is not virtualized. Kestrel is not containerized. Halcyon has a GPU. Kestrel has a GPU. Halcyon is not containerized. Halcyon is virtualized. Tundra has no GPU. Tundra is not virtualized. Tundra is not sharded. Halcyon has no firewall. Halcyon is cached. Halcyon is not sharded.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is not sharded and is containerized, then it is provisioned. (2) If a workload has a GPU and has no firewall, then it is patched. (3) If a workload is throttled, then it is not provisioned. (4) If a workload is not containerized and is cached, then it has no snapshot. (5) If a workload is cached, then it is replicated. (6) If a workload has a GPU and is not mirrored, then it is sandboxed. (7) If a workload has a GPU and has a firewall, then it is encrypted. (8) If a workload has a GPU and is mirrored and is virtualized, then it is isolated. (9) If a workload has a GPU and is not idle and is not virtualized, then it has a public endpoint. (10) If a workload has a GPU, then it has a snapshot. (11) If a workload has a GPU and is idle, then it has a failover node. When (3) and (1) clash, (3) prevails. When (10) and (4) clash, (10) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Kestrel?", "options": ["is encrypted", "is patched", "has a failover node", "is sandboxed", "is isolated", "has a public endpoint"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is encrypted", "unit_id": "u031596", "pair_id": "u031596-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031596-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c8bcecb1945de05d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a4", "a2", "a13", "a16", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031596-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kestrel is sharded. Tundra has a firewall. Kestrel has a firewall. Kestrel is throttled. Kestrel is cached. Kestrel is not virtualized. Kestrel is not containerized. Halcyon has a GPU. Kestrel has a GPU. Halcyon is not containerized. Halcyon is virtualized. Tundra has no GPU. Tundra is not virtualized. Tundra is not sharded. Halcyon has no firewall. Halcyon is cached. Halcyon is not sharded.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is not sharded and also is containerized, it also is provisioned. Clause 2: once any workload has a GPU and also has no firewall, it also is patched. Clause 3: once any workload is throttled, it also is not provisioned. Clause 4: once any workload is not containerized and also is cached, it also has no snapshot. Clause 5: once any workload is cached, it also is replicated. Clause 6: once any workload has a GPU and also is not mirrored, it also is sandboxed. Clause 7: once any workload has a GPU and also has a firewall, it also is encrypted. Clause 8: once any workload has a GPU and also is mirrored and also is virtualized, it also is isolated. Clause 9: once any workload has a GPU and also is not idle and also is not virtualized, it also has a public endpoint. Clause 10: once any workload has a GPU, it also has a snapshot. Clause 11: once any workload has a GPU and also is idle, it also has a failover node. Clause 3 overrides Clause 1. Clause 10 overrides Clause 4. Question: Which of these is true of Kestrel?", "options": ["is encrypted", "is patched", "has a failover node", "is sandboxed", "is isolated", "has a public endpoint"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is encrypted", "unit_id": "u031596", "pair_id": "u031596-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031596-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0e5fd30bc7df1308", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a4", "a2", "a13", "a16", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031596-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kestrel is sharded. Tundra has a firewall. Kestrel has a firewall. Kestrel is throttled. Kestrel is not cached. Kestrel is not virtualized. Kestrel is not containerized. Halcyon has a GPU. Kestrel has a GPU. Halcyon is not containerized. Halcyon is virtualized. Tundra has no GPU. Tundra is not virtualized. Tundra is not sharded. Halcyon has no firewall. Halcyon is cached. Halcyon is not sharded.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is not sharded and also is containerized, it also is provisioned. Clause 2: once any workload has a GPU and also has no firewall, it also is patched. Clause 3: once any workload is throttled, it also is not provisioned. Clause 4: once any workload is not containerized and also is cached, it also has no snapshot. Clause 5: once any workload is cached, it also is replicated. Clause 6: once any workload has a GPU and also is not mirrored, it also is sandboxed. Clause 7: once any workload has a GPU and also has a firewall, it also is encrypted. Clause 8: once any workload has a GPU and also is mirrored and also is virtualized, it also is isolated. Clause 9: once any workload has a GPU and also is not idle and also is not virtualized, it also has a public endpoint. Clause 10: once any workload has a GPU, it also has a snapshot. Clause 11: once any workload has a GPU and also is idle, it also has a failover node. Clause 3 overrides Clause 1. Clause 10 overrides Clause 4. Question: Which of these is true of Kestrel?", "options": ["is encrypted", "is patched", "has a failover node", "is sandboxed", "is isolated", "has a public endpoint"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is encrypted", "unit_id": "u031596", "pair_id": "u031596-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031596-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c8bcecb1945de05d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a4", "a2", "a13", "a16", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031596-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kestrel is sharded. Tundra has a firewall. Kestrel has a firewall. Kestrel is throttled. Kestrel is cached. Kestrel is not virtualized. Kestrel is not containerized. Halcyon has a GPU. Kestrel has a GPU. Halcyon is not containerized. Halcyon is virtualized. Tundra has no GPU. Tundra is not virtualized. Tundra is not sharded. Halcyon has no firewall. Halcyon is cached. Halcyon is not sharded.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is not sharded, and is containerized, that workload is provisioned. Item B. When the workload has a GPU, and has no firewall, that workload is patched. Item C. When the workload is throttled, that workload is not provisioned. Item D. When the workload is not containerized, and is cached, that workload has no snapshot. Item E. When the workload is cached, that workload is replicated. Item F. When the workload has a GPU, and is not mirrored, that workload is sandboxed. Item G. When the workload has a GPU, and has a firewall, that workload is encrypted. Item H. When the workload has a GPU, and is mirrored, and is virtualized, that workload is isolated. Item I. When the workload has a GPU, and is not idle, and is not virtualized, that workload has a public endpoint. Item J. When the workload has a GPU, that workload has a snapshot. Item K. When the workload has a GPU, and is idle, that workload has a failover node. Item C outranks Item A. Item J outranks Item D. Question: What applies to Kestrel?", "options": ["is encrypted", "is patched", "has a failover node", "is sandboxed", "is isolated", "has a public endpoint"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is encrypted", "unit_id": "u031596", "pair_id": "u031596-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031596-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "0e5fd30bc7df1308", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a4", "a2", "a13", "a16", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031596-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kestrel is sharded. Tundra has a firewall. Kestrel has a firewall. Kestrel is throttled. Kestrel is not cached. Kestrel is not virtualized. Kestrel is not containerized. Halcyon has a GPU. Kestrel has a GPU. Halcyon is not containerized. Halcyon is virtualized. Tundra has no GPU. Tundra is not virtualized. Tundra is not sharded. Halcyon has no firewall. Halcyon is cached. Halcyon is not sharded.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is not sharded, and is containerized, that workload is provisioned. Item B. When the workload has a GPU, and has no firewall, that workload is patched. Item C. When the workload is throttled, that workload is not provisioned. Item D. When the workload is not containerized, and is cached, that workload has no snapshot. Item E. When the workload is cached, that workload is replicated. Item F. When the workload has a GPU, and is not mirrored, that workload is sandboxed. Item G. When the workload has a GPU, and has a firewall, that workload is encrypted. Item H. When the workload has a GPU, and is mirrored, and is virtualized, that workload is isolated. Item I. When the workload has a GPU, and is not idle, and is not virtualized, that workload has a public endpoint. Item J. When the workload has a GPU, that workload has a snapshot. Item K. When the workload has a GPU, and is idle, that workload has a failover node. Item C outranks Item A. Item J outranks Item D. Question: What applies to Kestrel?", "options": ["is encrypted", "is patched", "has a failover node", "is sandboxed", "is isolated", "has a public endpoint"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is encrypted", "unit_id": "u031596", "pair_id": "u031596-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/4/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031596-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c8bcecb1945de05d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a14", "a4", "a2", "a13", "a16", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031607-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is not sandboxed. Borealis has a CPU quota of 95. Borealis is patched. Borealis has a latency budget of 4.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is throttled provided that it is patched as well as has a CPU quota of 75 or higher. Section 2: a workload has a snapshot provided that it is patched. Section 3: a workload is backed up provided that it is sandboxed as well as is patched as well as is deprecated. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it has a latency budget of 52 or higher as well as has a CPU quota of 75 or lower. Question: Borealis is deprecated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031607", "pair_id": "u031607-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031607-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d8c0e27ebb5605e7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031607-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Borealis is not sandboxed. Borealis has a CPU quota of 95. Borealis is not deprecated. Borealis is patched. Borealis has a latency budget of 4.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is throttled provided that it is patched as well as has a CPU quota of 75 or higher. Section 2: a workload has a snapshot provided that it is patched. Section 3: a workload is backed up provided that it is sandboxed as well as is patched as well as is deprecated. Section 2 lapses for a workload if it has a latency budget of 52 or higher as well as has a CPU quota of 75 or lower. Question: Borealis is deprecated. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031607", "pair_id": "u031607-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/2", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031607-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "26f1020bb27c7d0d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031626-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena has a patch cycle of 43. Galena has a defect tally of 10. Galena is not versioned. Galena is not documented. Galena has a test yield of 36.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is not reproducible and also has a defect tally of 12 or more, it also is not merged. Clause 2: once any build is not reproducible and also has a defect tally under 12, it also is merged. Clause 3: once any build is not versioned and also is experimental, it also is not linted. Clause 4: once any build has a patch cycle of 42 or less and also has a test yield of 62 or less, it also is not reproducible. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build has a patch cycle of 54 or more. Clause 2 does not hold for a build when any build is documented. Question: Does it follow that Galena is merged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031626", "pair_id": "u031626-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031626-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "bff97605d1c58cd1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031626-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Galena has a patch cycle of 43. Galena has a defect tally of 10. Galena is not versioned. Galena is not documented. Galena has a test yield of 36.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build is not reproducible and also has a defect tally of 12 or more, it also is not merged. Clause 2: once any build is not reproducible and also has a defect tally under 12, it also is merged. Clause 3: once any build is not versioned and also is experimental, it also is not linted. Clause 4: once any build has a patch cycle of 75 or less and also has a test yield of 62 or less, it also is not reproducible. Clause 3 does not hold for a build when any build has a patch cycle of 54 or more. Clause 2 does not hold for a build when any build is documented. Question: Does it follow that Galena is merged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031626", "pair_id": "u031626-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031626-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c73004360cfc5e71", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031689-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aldebaran is embargoed. Aldebaran is preregistered. Aldebaran has a steering committee. Aldebaran is not resubmitted. Aldebaran is not longitudinal. Aldebaran has no patent filing. Aldebaran is shortlisted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is multicenter while is embargoed, thus it is theoretical. Provision 2: when the proposal here has a patent filing, thus it is budgeted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is preregistered while is not longitudinal while has a steering committee, thus it is multicenter. Provision 4: when the proposal here is not preregistered while is shortlisted, thus it has no industry backing. Provision 5: when the proposal here is multicenter while is not embargoed while is not resubmitted, thus it has industry backing. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Which one describes Aldebaran?", "options": ["is theoretical", "has industry backing"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is theoretical", "unit_id": "u031689", "pair_id": "u031689-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031689-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "da82c61f9dd3f4c4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031689-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Aldebaran is not embargoed. Aldebaran is preregistered. Aldebaran has a steering committee. Aldebaran is not resubmitted. Aldebaran is not longitudinal. Aldebaran has no patent filing. Aldebaran is shortlisted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is multicenter while is embargoed, thus it is theoretical. Provision 2: when the proposal here has a patent filing, thus it is budgeted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is preregistered while is not longitudinal while has a steering committee, thus it is multicenter. Provision 4: when the proposal here is not preregistered while is shortlisted, thus it has no industry backing. Provision 5: when the proposal here is multicenter while is not embargoed while is not resubmitted, thus it has industry backing. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 5. Question: Which one describes Aldebaran?", "options": ["is theoretical", "has industry backing"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has industry backing", "unit_id": "u031689", "pair_id": "u031689-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031689-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2ff96a9e71a83a75", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a8"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031705-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Cosima is not ambulatory. Cosima is referred. Cosima has a chaperone. Cosima has a pain level of 35. Aurel has no chaperone. Cosima is admitted. Aurel has a mobility rank of 22. Cosima is not symptomatic.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here has a chaperone while has a pain level at or above 51, thus it is asthmatic. Provision 2: when the patient here has a chaperone while is referred while is admitted, thus it is bedridden. Provision 3: when the patient here has a chaperone while has a pulse rate at or above 34, thus it is triaged. Provision 4: when the patient here has a chaperone while has a mobility rank at or above 18 while has a pain level beyond 78, thus it is rescheduled. Provision 5: when the patient here has a chaperone while is ambulatory, thus it is diabetic. Provision 6: when the patient here has a chaperone while is not referred, thus it is pregnant. Provision 7: when the patient here is symptomatic while is not referred, thus it has no pacemaker. Provision 8: when the patient here has a chaperone while has a pulse rate beneath 34, thus it is sedated. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here has a fever reading at or below 88. Provision 4 has no effect when the patient here is ambulatory. Question: Which one describes Cosima?", "options": ["is sedated", "is bedridden", "is pregnant", "is diabetic", "is rescheduled", "is triaged", "is asthmatic"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bedridden", "unit_id": "u031705", "pair_id": "u031705-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031705-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f998170ccc6a9ea5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a13", "a15", "a16", "a0", "a2", "a14"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031705-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Cosima is not ambulatory. Cosima is referred. Cosima has a chaperone. Cosima has a pain level of 35. Aurel has no chaperone. Cosima is admitted. Aurel has a mobility rank of 22. Cosima is symptomatic.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here has a chaperone while has a pain level at or above 51, thus it is asthmatic. Provision 2: when the patient here has a chaperone while is referred while is admitted, thus it is bedridden. Provision 3: when the patient here has a chaperone while has a pulse rate at or above 34, thus it is triaged. Provision 4: when the patient here has a chaperone while has a mobility rank at or above 18 while has a pain level beyond 78, thus it is rescheduled. Provision 5: when the patient here has a chaperone while is ambulatory, thus it is diabetic. Provision 6: when the patient here has a chaperone while is not referred, thus it is pregnant. Provision 7: when the patient here is symptomatic while is not referred, thus it has no pacemaker. Provision 8: when the patient here has a chaperone while has a pulse rate beneath 34, thus it is sedated. Provision 1 has no effect when the patient here has a fever reading at or below 88. Provision 4 has no effect when the patient here is ambulatory. Question: Which one describes Cosima?", "options": ["is sedated", "is bedridden", "is pregnant", "is diabetic", "is rescheduled", "is triaged", "is asthmatic"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is bedridden", "unit_id": "u031705", "pair_id": "u031705-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031705-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "897559b4bc52e518", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a13", "a15", "a16", "a0", "a2", "a14"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031708-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is documented. Obsidian is not documented. Obsidian has a patch cycle of 52. Pumice has a defect tally of 31. Obsidian has a defect tally of 6. Obsidian has a test yield of 68. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is not experimental, it then is not tested. #2 Each time a build has a defect tally greater than 56, it then has no security advisory. #3 Each time a build is not documented, it then is not versioned. #4 Each time a build has a patch cycle greater than 68, it then is not merged. #5 Each time a build is not documented, it then is versioned. #5 is set aside if a build is documented. #4 is set aside if a build is experimental. #1 is set aside if a build is experimental. #3 is set aside if a build has a test yield of 68 or below. #5 is set aside if a build has a test yield greater than 68. Question: Do the terms above show that Obsidian is versioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031708", "pair_id": "u031708-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031708-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "da28776c6cd7afa7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u031708-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Pumice is documented. Obsidian is not documented. Obsidian has a patch cycle of 52. Pumice has a defect tally of 31. Obsidian has a defect tally of 6. Obsidian has a test yield of 99. Obsidian is experimental.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is not experimental, it then is not tested. #2 Each time a build has a defect tally greater than 56, it then has no security advisory. #3 Each time a build is not documented, it then is not versioned. #4 Each time a build has a patch cycle greater than 68, it then is not merged. #5 Each time a build is not documented, it then is versioned. #5 is set aside if a build is documented. #4 is set aside if a build is experimental. #1 is set aside if a build is experimental. #3 is set aside if a build has a test yield of 68 or below. #5 is set aside if a build has a test yield greater than 68. Question: Do the terms above show that Obsidian is versioned?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031708", "pair_id": "u031708-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031708-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "82402ed8f72465c0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u031710-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf has a pulse rate of 96. Yusuf is discharged. Gunnar has no caregiver. Xenia is discharged. Yusuf is rescheduled. Xenia has a mobility rank of 35. Yusuf is not fasting. Xenia has a chaperone. Gunnar has a fever reading of 60. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 54. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 72. Gunnar is admitted. Gunnar is ambulatory. Xenia has a caregiver. Yusuf is not ambulatory. Xenia has a pulse rate of 16. Yusuf has a pain level of 26. Yusuf is admitted. Yusuf is contagious. Yusuf has a chaperone.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is referred and has a pulse rate of at most 11, then it is not symptomatic. (2) If a patient is referred and has a pulse rate above 11, then it is symptomatic. (3) If a patient has a mobility rank of at most 11 and has a fever reading of at least 68 and has no chaperone, then it is vaccinated. (4) If a patient is referred and is admitted and has a caregiver, then it is sedated. (5) If a patient is bedridden and is discharged and is contagious, then it is referred. (6) If a patient is not ambulatory, then it is bedridden. (6) is void if the patient has a pain level below 10. (3) is void if the patient has a pain level of at most 64. (5) is void if the patient is fasting. Question: Is it true that Yusuf is symptomatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031710", "pair_id": "u031710-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031710-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "be7f2de485e1af0b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u031710-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yusuf has a pulse rate of 96. Yusuf is discharged. Gunnar has no caregiver. Xenia is discharged. Yusuf is rescheduled. Xenia has a mobility rank of 35. Yusuf is not fasting. Xenia has a chaperone. Gunnar has a fever reading of 60. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 54. Yusuf has a mobility rank of 72. Gunnar is admitted. Gunnar is ambulatory. Xenia has a caregiver. Yusuf is not ambulatory. Xenia has a pulse rate of 16. Yusuf has a pain level of 26. Yusuf is admitted. Yusuf is contagious. Yusuf has a chaperone.", "instruction": "(1) If a patient is referred and has a pulse rate of at most 11, then it is not symptomatic. (2) If a patient is referred and has a pulse rate above 11, then it is symptomatic. (3) If a patient has a mobility rank of at most 11 and has a fever reading of at least 68 and has no chaperone, then it is vaccinated. (4) If a patient is rescheduled, then it is asthmatic. (5) If a patient is referred and is admitted and has a caregiver, then it is sedated. (6) If a patient is bedridden and is discharged and is contagious, then it is referred. (7) If a patient is not ambulatory, then it is bedridden. (7) is void if the patient has a pain level below 10. (3) is void if the patient has a pain level of at most 64. (6) is void if the patient is fasting. Question: Is it true that Yusuf is symptomatic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031710", "pair_id": "u031710-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031710-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d6b3394b00beea10", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u031728-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is not delayed. Priya has no locker slot. Nandor has a parcel volume of 34. Liesel has a delivery window of 23. Liesel is not delayed. Priya has a delivery window of 48. Liesel has a parcel volume of 23. Nandor has no locker slot. Ulla is delayed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is perishable: then it is not stamped. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window higher than 34: then it is sealed. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is stamped. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it is undeliverable. Policy V. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume no lower than 74: then it is not prepaid. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel has a locker slot: then it is damaged. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel has a locker slot: then it is not tracked. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is undeliverable: then it has a barcode. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is not sealed: then it is perishable. Question: Is it so that Priya is stamped?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031728", "pair_id": "u031728-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031728-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "2420b35c6bc2154d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031728-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is not delayed. Priya has no locker slot. Nandor has a parcel volume of 34. Liesel has a delivery window of 23. Liesel is not delayed. Priya has a delivery window of 48. Liesel has a parcel volume of 23. Nandor has no locker slot. Ulla is delayed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is perishable: then it is not stamped. Policy II. Suppose that parcel has a delivery window higher than 34: then it is sealed. Policy III. Suppose that parcel has a barcode: then it is stamped. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it is undeliverable. Policy V. Suppose that parcel has a parcel volume no lower than 74: then it is not prepaid. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel has a locker slot: then it is damaged. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel has a locker slot: then it is not tracked. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel is undeliverable: then it has a barcode. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is sealed: then it is perishable. Question: Is it so that Priya is stamped?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031728", "pair_id": "u031728-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031728-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "6f6e5c8f04dc8c7f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a11", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031733-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste is not a claimant. Fabian is lapsed. Fabian is not indemnified. Celeste is indemnified. Xaver is litigated. Xaver is not a smoker. Xaver is not a claimant. Xaver is not disputed. Fabian is not disputed. Celeste is not lapsed. Xaver is not indemnified. Xaver is not reinstated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is not lapsed, thus it is covered. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is retired. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is indemnified, thus it has no roadside assistance. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is a smoker, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is covered, thus it has no beneficiary. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it is bundled. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is covered, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is litigated, thus it has roadside assistance. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here is disputed. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Which one describes Xaver?", "options": ["is bundled", "is grandfathered", "has a beneficiary"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a beneficiary", "unit_id": "u031733", "pair_id": "u031733-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/11", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031733-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "35ae42bf787b0f57", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a2", "a3", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031733-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Celeste is not a claimant. Fabian is lapsed. Fabian is not indemnified. Celeste is indemnified. Xaver is litigated. Xaver is not a smoker. Xaver is not a claimant. Xaver is not disputed. Fabian is not disputed. Celeste is not lapsed. Xaver is not indemnified. Xaver is not lapsed. Xaver is not reinstated.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the policyholder here has roadside assistance, thus it has a beneficiary. Provision 2: when the policyholder here is not lapsed, thus it is covered. Provision 3: when the policyholder here is a claimant, thus it is retired. Provision 4: when the policyholder here is indemnified, thus it has no roadside assistance. Provision 5: when the policyholder here is a smoker, thus it has a dashcam. Provision 6: when the policyholder here is covered, thus it has no beneficiary. Provision 7: when the policyholder here is retired, thus it is bundled. Provision 8: when the policyholder here is covered, thus it is grandfathered. Provision 9: when the policyholder here is litigated, thus it has roadside assistance. Provision 1 has no effect when the policyholder here is disputed. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Which one describes Xaver?", "options": ["is bundled", "is grandfathered", "has a beneficiary"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is grandfathered", "unit_id": "u031733", "pair_id": "u031733-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/11", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031733-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f30674d81087a7a7", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a2", "a3", "a10"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u031820-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is not obsolete. Galena is flaky. Galena is obsolete. Galena is tagged. Basalt is tagged. Basalt has a patch cycle of 67.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a patch cycle of maximum 24, it thereby has a security advisory. Point B. If said build is tagged, it thereby is profiled. Point C. If said build is tagged, it thereby is not linted. Point D. If said build is flaky and further has a patch cycle of maximum 58 and further is obsolete, it thereby is minified. Point E. If said build is flaky, it thereby has no security advisory. Point F. If said build is flaky and further has a patch cycle in excess of 58, it thereby is not minified. Point D supersedes Point F. Point E supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Galena is minified. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031820", "pair_id": "u031820-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031820-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "97df5d2a1ba8e8f4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031820-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is not obsolete. Galena is flaky. Galena is obsolete. Galena is tagged. Basalt is tagged. Galena has a patch cycle of 80. Basalt has a patch cycle of 67.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a patch cycle of maximum 24, it thereby has a security advisory. Point B. If said build is tagged, it thereby is profiled. Point C. If said build is tagged, it thereby is not linted. Point D. If said build is flaky and further has a patch cycle of maximum 58 and further is obsolete, it thereby is minified. Point E. If said build is flaky, it thereby has no security advisory. Point F. If said build is flaky and further has a patch cycle in excess of 58, it thereby is not minified. Point D supersedes Point F. Point E supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Galena is minified. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031820", "pair_id": "u031820-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031820-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a7bd963d9a8b6972", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031820-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is not obsolete. Galena is flaky. Galena is obsolete. Galena is tagged. Basalt is tagged. Basalt has a patch cycle of 67.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a patch cycle not above 24, so it has a security advisory. No. 2 While the given build is tagged, so it is profiled. No. 3 While the given build is tagged, so it is not linted. No. 4 While the given build is flaky and likewise has a patch cycle not above 58 and likewise is obsolete, so it is minified. No. 5 While the given build is flaky, so it has no security advisory. No. 6 While the given build is flaky and likewise has a patch cycle that exceeds 58, so it is not minified. No. 4 wins over No. 6. No. 5 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Galena is minified\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031820", "pair_id": "u031820-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031820-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "97df5d2a1ba8e8f4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031820-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Basalt is not obsolete. Galena is flaky. Galena is obsolete. Galena is tagged. Basalt is tagged. Galena has a patch cycle of 80. Basalt has a patch cycle of 67.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a patch cycle not above 24, so it has a security advisory. No. 2 While the given build is tagged, so it is profiled. No. 3 While the given build is tagged, so it is not linted. No. 4 While the given build is flaky and likewise has a patch cycle not above 58 and likewise is obsolete, so it is minified. No. 5 While the given build is flaky, so it has no security advisory. No. 6 While the given build is flaky and likewise has a patch cycle that exceeds 58, so it is not minified. No. 4 wins over No. 6. No. 5 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Galena is minified\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031820", "pair_id": "u031820-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031820-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a7bd963d9a8b6972", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031832-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel has no chaperone. Florin is anemic. Florin is not hypertensive. Xenia is anemic. Wendel is not anemic. Wendel is hypertensive. Gunnar is not anemic. Gunnar has no pacemaker. Gunnar has a chaperone.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has a chaperone: then it is not triaged. Policy II. Suppose that patient is anemic: then it has an interpreter. Policy III. Suppose that patient is not contagious: then it is not ambulatory. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is not hypertensive: then it is not contagious. Policy V. Suppose that patient is not contagious: then it is ambulatory. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is not anemic: then it is triaged. Policy V is waived if that patient has no pacemaker. Policy III is waived if that patient has a pacemaker. Policy V is waived if that patient has a chaperone. Policy VI is waived if that patient has no pacemaker. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Florin is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031832", "pair_id": "u031832-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031832-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ffc8f73b15e369f3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u031832-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Wendel has no chaperone. Florin is anemic. Florin is not hypertensive. Xenia is anemic. Wendel is not anemic. Wendel is hypertensive. Gunnar is not anemic. Gunnar has no pacemaker. Gunnar has a chaperone.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has a chaperone: then it is not triaged. Policy II. Suppose that patient is anemic: then it has an interpreter. Policy III. Suppose that patient is not contagious: then it is not ambulatory. Policy IV. Suppose that patient is hypertensive: then it is not contagious. Policy V. Suppose that patient is not contagious: then it is ambulatory. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is not anemic: then it is triaged. Policy V is waived if that patient has no pacemaker. Policy III is waived if that patient has a pacemaker. Policy V is waived if that patient has a chaperone. Policy VI is waived if that patient has no pacemaker. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy VI. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Florin is not ambulatory?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031832", "pair_id": "u031832-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031832-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c3878ea53f4d45d1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u031838-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is not notarized. Obsidian is not obsolete. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Pumice is benchmarked. Pumice has a defect tally of 13.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is linted provided that it is not documented. Section 2: a build is minified provided that it is not obsolete. Section 3: a build is localized provided that it is minified. Section 4: a build is fuzzed provided that it is documented. Section 5: a build is tagged provided that it is localized. Section 6: a build is not documented provided that it is notarized. Section 7: a build has a feature toggle provided that it has a defect tally lower than 22. Section 8: a build is not merged provided that it is benchmarked. Question: Obsidian is not tagged. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031838", "pair_id": "u031838-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031838-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "428586faa21f8d83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031838-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is not notarized. Obsidian is not obsolete. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Pumice is benchmarked. Pumice has a defect tally of 13.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is linted provided that it is not documented. Section 2: a build is minified provided that it is not obsolete. Section 3: a build is localized provided that it is minified. Section 4: a build is fuzzed provided that it is documented. Section 5: a build is tagged provided that it is localized. Section 6: a build is not documented provided that it is notarized. Section 7: a build has a feature toggle provided that it has a defect tally lower than 22. Section 8: a build is not tagged provided that it is linted. Section 9: a build is not merged provided that it is benchmarked. Question: Obsidian is not tagged. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031838", "pair_id": "u031838-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031838-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "203ea0f6af884432", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031838-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is not notarized. Obsidian is not obsolete. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Pumice is benchmarked. Pumice has a defect tally of 13.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is not documented: then it is linted. Policy II. Suppose that build is not obsolete: then it is minified. Policy III. Suppose that build is minified: then it is localized. Policy IV. Suppose that build is documented: then it is fuzzed. Policy V. Suppose that build is localized: then it is tagged. Policy VI. Suppose that build is notarized: then it is not documented. Policy VII. Suppose that build has a defect tally smaller than 22: then it has a feature toggle. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is benchmarked: then it is not merged. Question: Is it so that Obsidian is not tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031838", "pair_id": "u031838-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031838-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "428586faa21f8d83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031838-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is not notarized. Obsidian is not obsolete. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Pumice is benchmarked. Pumice has a defect tally of 13.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is not documented: then it is linted. Policy II. Suppose that build is not obsolete: then it is minified. Policy III. Suppose that build is minified: then it is localized. Policy IV. Suppose that build is documented: then it is fuzzed. Policy V. Suppose that build is localized: then it is tagged. Policy VI. Suppose that build is notarized: then it is not documented. Policy VII. Suppose that build has a defect tally smaller than 22: then it has a feature toggle. Policy VIII. Suppose that build is linted: then it is not tagged. Policy IX. Suppose that build is benchmarked: then it is not merged. Question: Is it so that Obsidian is not tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031838", "pair_id": "u031838-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031838-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "203ea0f6af884432", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031838-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is not notarized. Obsidian is not obsolete. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Pumice is benchmarked. Pumice has a defect tally of 13.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is not documented, it then is linted. #2 Each time a build is not obsolete, it then is minified. #3 Each time a build is minified, it then is localized. #4 Each time a build is documented, it then is fuzzed. #5 Each time a build is localized, it then is tagged. #6 Each time a build is notarized, it then is not documented. #7 Each time a build has a defect tally less than 22, it then has a feature toggle. #8 Each time a build is benchmarked, it then is not merged. Question: Do the terms above show that Obsidian is not tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031838", "pair_id": "u031838-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031838-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "428586faa21f8d83", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031838-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Obsidian is not notarized. Obsidian is not obsolete. Obsidian is not benchmarked. Pumice is benchmarked. Pumice has a defect tally of 13.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is not documented, it then is linted. #2 Each time a build is not obsolete, it then is minified. #3 Each time a build is minified, it then is localized. #4 Each time a build is documented, it then is fuzzed. #5 Each time a build is localized, it then is tagged. #6 Each time a build is notarized, it then is not documented. #7 Each time a build has a defect tally less than 22, it then has a feature toggle. #8 Each time a build is linted, it then is not tagged. #9 Each time a build is benchmarked, it then is not merged. Question: Do the terms above show that Obsidian is not tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031838", "pair_id": "u031838-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/7", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031838-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "203ea0f6af884432", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031845-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon has a GPU. Halcyon is encrypted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is idle, it then is sharded. #2 Each time a workload is encrypted, it then is cached. #3 Each time a workload is virtualized, it then has a dedicated host. #4 Each time a workload has a dedicated host, it then is autoscaled. #5 Each time a workload is deprecated, it then is not autoscaled. #6 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is deprecated. Question: Do the terms above show that Halcyon is autoscaled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031845", "pair_id": "u031845-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031845-edit", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "3e5791c0be94c0a3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031845-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Halcyon has a GPU. Halcyon is encrypted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is idle, it then is sharded. #2 Each time a workload is encrypted, it then is cached. #3 Each time a workload is virtualized, it then has a dedicated host. #4 Each time a workload has a dedicated host, it then is autoscaled. #5 Each time a workload is encrypted, it then is isolated. #6 Each time a workload is deprecated, it then is not autoscaled. #7 Each time a workload has a GPU, it then is deprecated. Question: Do the terms above show that Halcyon is autoscaled?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031845", "pair_id": "u031845-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/4", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031845-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "3a03d8e4c33d3d07", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031860-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is reinstated. Una is retired. Bruno is not retired. Una is not disputed. Una is bundled. Bruno is not bundled. Una is not a smoker. Una is not reinstated. Wanda is reinstated. Bruno is disputed. Wanda is not reimbursed. Bruno is not reimbursed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is retired, so it is subrogated. No. 2 While the given policyholder is bundled and likewise is reimbursed, so it is not covered. No. 3 While the given policyholder is subrogated and likewise is retired and likewise is reinstated, so it is not lapsed. No. 4 While the given policyholder is subrogated and likewise is retired and likewise is not disputed, so it is lapsed. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is a smoker and likewise is retired. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is retired. Question: Is the claim \"Una is lapsed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031860", "pair_id": "u031860-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031860-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9f119c4a7b7cbb1e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u031860-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno is reinstated. Una is retired. Bruno is not retired. Una is not disputed. Una is bundled. Bruno is not bundled. Una is not a smoker. Una is not reinstated. Wanda is reinstated. Bruno is disputed. Wanda is not reimbursed. Bruno is not reimbursed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given policyholder is retired, so it is subrogated. No. 2 While the given policyholder is bundled and likewise is reimbursed, so it is not covered. No. 3 While the given policyholder is subrogated and likewise is retired and likewise is reinstated, so it is not lapsed. No. 4 While the given policyholder is subrogated and likewise is retired and likewise is disputed, so it is lapsed. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is a smoker and likewise is retired. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given policyholder is retired. Question: Is the claim \"Una is lapsed\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031860", "pair_id": "u031860-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/2/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031860-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d90a49b64042cc70", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u031930-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirach is not budgeted. Hadar has a field site. Hadar is shortlisted. Mirach has a citation index of 17. Hadar has a citation index of 84. Electra is not budgeted. Hadar is exploratory. Mirach is not exploratory. Electra is not exploratory.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is multicenter, then it has a postdoc. (2) If a proposal is budgeted, then it has industry backing. (3) If a proposal is exploratory, then it is collaborative. (4) If a proposal has industry backing, then it has ethics clearance. (5) If a proposal is shortlisted, then it is cofunded. (6) If a proposal has a citation index above 85, then it is multicenter. (7) If a proposal has a citation index of at least 79, then it is not peer reviewed. (8) If a proposal is collaborative, then it is resubmitted. (9) If a proposal has a field site, then it is longitudinal. (10) If a proposal has ethics clearance, then it is embargoed. (11) If a proposal is longitudinal, then it is renewed. (5) is void if the proposal is exploratory. (11) is void if the proposal is exploratory. (1) is void if the proposal is budgeted. Question: Which option holds for Hadar?", "options": ["has a postdoc", "is resubmitted", "has ethics clearance", "is renewed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is resubmitted", "unit_id": "u031930", "pair_id": "u031930-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031930-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "cdba0fcc3b8262c3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a0", "a9", "a10"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031930-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Mirach is not budgeted. Hadar has a field site. Hadar is shortlisted. Mirach has a citation index of 17. Hadar has a citation index of 84. Electra is not budgeted. Hadar is not exploratory. Mirach is not exploratory. Electra is not exploratory.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is multicenter, then it has a postdoc. (2) If a proposal is budgeted, then it has industry backing. (3) If a proposal is exploratory, then it is collaborative. (4) If a proposal has industry backing, then it has ethics clearance. (5) If a proposal is shortlisted, then it is cofunded. (6) If a proposal has a citation index above 85, then it is multicenter. (7) If a proposal has a citation index of at least 79, then it is not peer reviewed. (8) If a proposal is collaborative, then it is resubmitted. (9) If a proposal has a field site, then it is longitudinal. (10) If a proposal has ethics clearance, then it is embargoed. (11) If a proposal is longitudinal, then it is renewed. (5) is void if the proposal is exploratory. (11) is void if the proposal is exploratory. (1) is void if the proposal is budgeted. Question: Which option holds for Hadar?", "options": ["has a postdoc", "is resubmitted", "has ethics clearance", "is renewed"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is renewed", "unit_id": "u031930", "pair_id": "u031930-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031930-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4ad30275bf6e55dc", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a13", "a0", "a9", "a10"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031935-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is merged. Mica has a lint backlog of 25. Feldspar is not fuzzed. Quartz has a lint backlog of 34. Feldspar has a lint backlog of 25. Feldspar is not reproducible. Mica is linted. Feldspar is not merged. Quartz is linted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a lint backlog at or below 76, thus it has a feature toggle. Provision 2: when the build here is not documented, thus it is tagged. Provision 3: when the build here is localized, thus it is not tagged. Provision 4: when the build here is not merged, thus it is not documented. Provision 5: when the build here is fuzzed, thus it is versioned. Provision 6: when the build here is not reproducible, thus it is not localized. Provision 7: when the build here is not linted, thus it is localized. Provision 8: when the build here is merged, thus it is tested. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Quartz is tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031935", "pair_id": "u031935-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031935-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e3e57ba5ee8f4a90", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031935-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is merged. Mica has a lint backlog of 25. Feldspar is not fuzzed. Quartz has a lint backlog of 34. Feldspar has a lint backlog of 25. Feldspar is not reproducible. Mica is linted. Feldspar is not merged. Quartz is linted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the build here has a lint backlog at or below 76, thus it has a feature toggle. Provision 2: when the build here is not documented, thus it is tagged. Provision 3: when the build here is localized, thus it is not tagged. Provision 4: when the build here is not merged, thus it is not documented. Provision 5: when the build here is fuzzed, thus it is versioned. Provision 6: when the build here is not reproducible, thus it is not localized. Provision 7: when the build here is not linted, thus it is localized. Provision 8: when the build here is not merged, thus it is tested. Provision 7 has priority over Provision 6. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Would it be right to say that Quartz is tagged?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031935", "pair_id": "u031935-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031935-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "78b3a6f9b7971cb8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031935-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is merged. Mica has a lint backlog of 25. Feldspar is not fuzzed. Quartz has a lint backlog of 34. Feldspar has a lint backlog of 25. Feldspar is not reproducible. Mica is linted. Feldspar is not merged. Quartz is linted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a lint backlog not above 76, so it has a feature toggle. No. 2 While the given build is not documented, so it is tagged. No. 3 While the given build is localized, so it is not tagged. No. 4 While the given build is not merged, so it is not documented. No. 5 While the given build is fuzzed, so it is versioned. No. 6 While the given build is not reproducible, so it is not localized. No. 7 While the given build is not linted, so it is localized. No. 8 While the given build is merged, so it is tested. No. 7 wins over No. 6. No. 3 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Quartz is tagged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031935", "pair_id": "u031935-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031935-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e3e57ba5ee8f4a90", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031935-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quartz is merged. Mica has a lint backlog of 25. Feldspar is not fuzzed. Quartz has a lint backlog of 34. Feldspar has a lint backlog of 25. Feldspar is not reproducible. Mica is linted. Feldspar is not merged. Quartz is linted.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a lint backlog not above 76, so it has a feature toggle. No. 2 While the given build is not documented, so it is tagged. No. 3 While the given build is localized, so it is not tagged. No. 4 While the given build is not merged, so it is not documented. No. 5 While the given build is fuzzed, so it is versioned. No. 6 While the given build is not reproducible, so it is not localized. No. 7 While the given build is not linted, so it is localized. No. 8 While the given build is not merged, so it is tested. No. 7 wins over No. 6. No. 3 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Quartz is tagged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031935", "pair_id": "u031935-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031935-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "78b3a6f9b7971cb8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031945-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek has a pulse rate of 83. Benedek has a fever reading of 13. Benedek is not contagious. Benedek is sedated. Vilja has a fever reading of 62. Benedek has a mobility rank of 66. Benedek is not diabetic. Elif has a pulse rate of 63. Vilja has a pain level of 11.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further is not diabetic, it thereby is allergic. Point B. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further has a fever reading of maximum 38 and further is not sedated, it thereby is ambulatory. Point C. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further has a pain level of maximum 33, it thereby is rescheduled. Point D. If said patient is not contagious, it thereby is not discharged. Point E. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further has a fever reading in excess of 38, it thereby is waitlisted. Point F. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further has a mobility rank short of 24, it thereby has a chaperone. Point G. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further has a mobility rank of minimum 24 and further is not anemic, it thereby is triaged. Point H. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further has a pain level in excess of 33, it thereby is hypertensive. Point I. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further is diabetic, it thereby is pregnant. Question: Which choice is true for Benedek?", "options": ["is waitlisted", "is ambulatory", "is rescheduled", "is allergic", "has a chaperone", "is triaged", "is hypertensive", "is pregnant"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is allergic", "unit_id": "u031945", "pair_id": "u031945-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031945-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "ea9afd7b4cc17ec3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a2", "a7", "a14", "a1", "a9", "a13", "a12"]}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u031945-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek has a pulse rate of 83. Benedek has a fever reading of 13. Benedek is not contagious. Benedek is sedated. Vilja has a fever reading of 62. Benedek has a mobility rank of 66. Benedek is diabetic. Elif has a pulse rate of 63. Vilja has a pain level of 11.", "instruction": "Point A. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further is not diabetic, it thereby is allergic. Point B. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further has a fever reading of maximum 38 and further is not sedated, it thereby is ambulatory. Point C. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further has a pain level of maximum 33, it thereby is rescheduled. Point D. If said patient is not contagious, it thereby is not discharged. Point E. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further has a fever reading in excess of 38, it thereby is waitlisted. Point F. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further has a mobility rank short of 24, it thereby has a chaperone. Point G. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further has a mobility rank of minimum 24 and further is not anemic, it thereby is triaged. Point H. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further has a pain level in excess of 33, it thereby is hypertensive. Point I. If said patient has a pulse rate of minimum 69 and further is diabetic, it thereby is pregnant. Question: Which choice is true for Benedek?", "options": ["is waitlisted", "is ambulatory", "is rescheduled", "is allergic", "has a chaperone", "is triaged", "is hypertensive", "is pregnant"], "target": 7, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is pregnant", "unit_id": "u031945", "pair_id": "u031945-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031945-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1c002c52ca72fb6d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a2", "a7", "a14", "a1", "a9", "a13", "a12"]}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u031945-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek has a pulse rate of 83. Benedek has a fever reading of 13. Benedek is not contagious. Benedek is sedated. Vilja has a fever reading of 62. Benedek has a mobility rank of 66. Benedek is not diabetic. Elif has a pulse rate of 63. Vilja has a pain level of 11.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise is not diabetic, so it is allergic. No. 2 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise has a fever reading not above 38 and likewise is not sedated, so it is ambulatory. No. 3 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise has a pain level not above 33, so it is rescheduled. No. 4 While the given patient is not contagious, so it is not discharged. No. 5 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise has a fever reading that exceeds 38, so it is waitlisted. No. 6 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise has a mobility rank that falls below 24, so it has a chaperone. No. 7 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise has a mobility rank not below 24 and likewise is not anemic, so it is triaged. No. 8 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise has a pain level that exceeds 33, so it is hypertensive. No. 9 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise is diabetic, so it is pregnant. Question: Select what holds for Benedek: which option?", "options": ["is waitlisted", "is ambulatory", "is rescheduled", "is allergic", "has a chaperone", "is triaged", "is hypertensive", "is pregnant"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is allergic", "unit_id": "u031945", "pair_id": "u031945-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031945-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "ea9afd7b4cc17ec3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a2", "a7", "a14", "a1", "a9", "a13", "a12"]}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u031945-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Benedek has a pulse rate of 83. Benedek has a fever reading of 13. Benedek is not contagious. Benedek is sedated. Vilja has a fever reading of 62. Benedek has a mobility rank of 66. Benedek is diabetic. Elif has a pulse rate of 63. Vilja has a pain level of 11.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise is not diabetic, so it is allergic. No. 2 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise has a fever reading not above 38 and likewise is not sedated, so it is ambulatory. No. 3 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise has a pain level not above 33, so it is rescheduled. No. 4 While the given patient is not contagious, so it is not discharged. No. 5 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise has a fever reading that exceeds 38, so it is waitlisted. No. 6 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise has a mobility rank that falls below 24, so it has a chaperone. No. 7 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise has a mobility rank not below 24 and likewise is not anemic, so it is triaged. No. 8 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise has a pain level that exceeds 33, so it is hypertensive. No. 9 While the given patient has a pulse rate not below 69 and likewise is diabetic, so it is pregnant. Question: Select what holds for Benedek: which option?", "options": ["is waitlisted", "is ambulatory", "is rescheduled", "is allergic", "has a chaperone", "is triaged", "is hypertensive", "is pregnant"], "target": 7, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is pregnant", "unit_id": "u031945", "pair_id": "u031945-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031945-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "1c002c52ca72fb6d", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a8", "a2", "a7", "a14", "a1", "a9", "a13", "a12"]}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u031947-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has a premium discount. Bruno is not lapsed. Zdenek is retired. Zdenek has no premium discount.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby has no deductible waiver. Point B. If said policyholder is retired, it thereby is reinstated. Point C. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby is litigated. Point D. If said policyholder is not lapsed, it thereby has flood coverage. Point E. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby is not litigated. Question: Statement: Bruno is not litigated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031947", "pair_id": "u031947-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031947-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "b182b622a1ea265c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031947-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bruno has a premium discount. Bruno is not lapsed. Zdenek is retired. Zdenek has no premium discount.", "instruction": "Point A. If said policyholder has a premium discount, it thereby has no deductible waiver. Point B. If said policyholder is retired, it thereby is reinstated. Point C. If said policyholder is reinstated, it thereby is litigated. Point D. If said policyholder is lapsed, it thereby has flood coverage. Point E. If said policyholder has flood coverage, it thereby is not litigated. Question: Statement: Bruno is not litigated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c00", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031947", "pair_id": "u031947-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031947-orig", "rule_types": [], "theory_hash": "80a2416ffa267eb2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031955-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh is not weighed. Quentin is not oversized. Kaveh is not oversized. Liesel is not weighed. Quentin is refrigerated. Quentin is fragile. Liesel is fragile.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not fragile: then it is hazardous. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is not oversized: then it is damaged. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated: then it is rerouted. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is weighed: then it is prepaid. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is not refrigerated: then it is consolidated. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is stamped. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is perishable. Question: Which choice is right for Liesel?", "options": ["is hazardous", "is stamped", "is perishable", "is consolidated", "is damaged", "is rerouted"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is stamped", "unit_id": "u031955", "pair_id": "u031955-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031955-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "49f8fa6d9f21e141", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a1", "a10", "a2", "a5", "a6", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031955-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Kaveh is not weighed. Quentin is not oversized. Kaveh is not oversized. Liesel is not weighed. Quentin is refrigerated. Quentin is fragile. Liesel is not fragile.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not fragile: then it is hazardous. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is not oversized: then it is damaged. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is refrigerated: then it is rerouted. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel is weighed: then it is prepaid. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is not refrigerated: then it is consolidated. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is fragile: then it is stamped. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is perishable. Question: Which choice is right for Liesel?", "options": ["is hazardous", "is stamped", "is perishable", "is consolidated", "is damaged", "is rerouted"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is hazardous", "unit_id": "u031955", "pair_id": "u031955-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031955-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "d06437fe5e6f0062", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a1", "a10", "a2", "a5", "a6", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u031957-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian has a pain level of 54. Florin has a fever reading of 60. Elif has a fever reading of 48. Florin has no interpreter. Elif has a pain level of 62. Florin has a pain level of 24. Dorian has no interpreter. Florin is not ambulatory. Florin has a mobility rank of 92. Elif is not ambulatory. Elif is not anemic. Elif has a mobility rank of 74. Dorian has a fever reading of 46. Elif has no interpreter.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is not pregnant provided that it has a pain level exceeding 57 as well as has no interpreter as well as has a mobility rank exceeding 35. Section 2: a patient is not allergic provided that it is fasting as well as is not ambulatory as well as is not waitlisted. Section 3: a patient has no chaperone provided that it is anemic as well as has a fever reading of 42 or higher. Section 4: a patient is not waitlisted provided that it has a fever reading lower than 61. Section 5: a patient is fasting provided that it has a mobility rank exceeding 57 as well as has a pain level exceeding 53. Section 6: a patient is allergic provided that it is fasting as well as is ambulatory as well as is not pregnant. Question: Elif is allergic. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031957", "pair_id": "u031957-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031957-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "6bdff7fafaf2fa7d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031957-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian has a pain level of 54. Florin has a fever reading of 60. Elif has a fever reading of 48. Florin has no interpreter. Elif has a pain level of 62. Florin has a pain level of 24. Dorian has no interpreter. Florin is not ambulatory. Florin has a mobility rank of 92. Elif is ambulatory. Elif is not anemic. Elif has a mobility rank of 74. Dorian has a fever reading of 46. Elif has no interpreter.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is not pregnant provided that it has a pain level exceeding 57 as well as has no interpreter as well as has a mobility rank exceeding 35. Section 2: a patient is not allergic provided that it is fasting as well as is not ambulatory as well as is not waitlisted. Section 3: a patient has no chaperone provided that it is anemic as well as has a fever reading of 42 or higher. Section 4: a patient is not waitlisted provided that it has a fever reading lower than 61. Section 5: a patient is fasting provided that it has a mobility rank exceeding 57 as well as has a pain level exceeding 53. Section 6: a patient is allergic provided that it is fasting as well as is ambulatory as well as is not pregnant. Question: Elif is allergic. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031957", "pair_id": "u031957-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031957-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8ea4a2f09eac09ca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031957-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian has a pain level of 54. Florin has a fever reading of 60. Elif has a fever reading of 48. Florin has no interpreter. Elif has a pain level of 62. Florin has a pain level of 24. Dorian has no interpreter. Florin is not ambulatory. Florin has a mobility rank of 92. Elif is not ambulatory. Elif is not anemic. Elif has a mobility rank of 74. Dorian has a fever reading of 46. Elif has no interpreter.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has a pain level higher than 57 plus has no interpreter plus has a mobility rank higher than 35: then it is not pregnant. Policy II. Suppose that patient is fasting plus is not ambulatory plus is not waitlisted: then it is not allergic. Policy III. Suppose that patient is anemic plus has a fever reading no lower than 42: then it has no chaperone. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a fever reading smaller than 61: then it is not waitlisted. Policy V. Suppose that patient has a mobility rank higher than 57 plus has a pain level higher than 53: then it is fasting. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is fasting plus is ambulatory plus is not pregnant: then it is allergic. Question: Is it so that Elif is allergic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031957", "pair_id": "u031957-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031957-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "6bdff7fafaf2fa7d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031957-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian has a pain level of 54. Florin has a fever reading of 60. Elif has a fever reading of 48. Florin has no interpreter. Elif has a pain level of 62. Florin has a pain level of 24. Dorian has no interpreter. Florin is not ambulatory. Florin has a mobility rank of 92. Elif is ambulatory. Elif is not anemic. Elif has a mobility rank of 74. Dorian has a fever reading of 46. Elif has no interpreter.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient has a pain level higher than 57 plus has no interpreter plus has a mobility rank higher than 35: then it is not pregnant. Policy II. Suppose that patient is fasting plus is not ambulatory plus is not waitlisted: then it is not allergic. Policy III. Suppose that patient is anemic plus has a fever reading no lower than 42: then it has no chaperone. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a fever reading smaller than 61: then it is not waitlisted. Policy V. Suppose that patient has a mobility rank higher than 57 plus has a pain level higher than 53: then it is fasting. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is fasting plus is ambulatory plus is not pregnant: then it is allergic. Question: Is it so that Elif is allergic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031957", "pair_id": "u031957-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031957-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8ea4a2f09eac09ca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031957-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian has a pain level of 54. Florin has a fever reading of 60. Elif has a fever reading of 48. Florin has no interpreter. Elif has a pain level of 62. Florin has a pain level of 24. Dorian has no interpreter. Florin is not ambulatory. Florin has a mobility rank of 92. Elif is not ambulatory. Elif is not anemic. Elif has a mobility rank of 74. Dorian has a fever reading of 46. Elif has no interpreter.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has a pain level greater than 57 and additionally has no interpreter and additionally has a mobility rank greater than 35, it then is not pregnant. #2 Each time a patient is fasting and additionally is not ambulatory and additionally is not waitlisted, it then is not allergic. #3 Each time a patient is anemic and additionally has a fever reading of 42 or above, it then has no chaperone. #4 Each time a patient has a fever reading less than 61, it then is not waitlisted. #5 Each time a patient has a mobility rank greater than 57 and additionally has a pain level greater than 53, it then is fasting. #6 Each time a patient is fasting and additionally is ambulatory and additionally is not pregnant, it then is allergic. Question: Do the terms above show that Elif is allergic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u031957", "pair_id": "u031957-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031957-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "6bdff7fafaf2fa7d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031957-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dorian has a pain level of 54. Florin has a fever reading of 60. Elif has a fever reading of 48. Florin has no interpreter. Elif has a pain level of 62. Florin has a pain level of 24. Dorian has no interpreter. Florin is not ambulatory. Florin has a mobility rank of 92. Elif is ambulatory. Elif is not anemic. Elif has a mobility rank of 74. Dorian has a fever reading of 46. Elif has no interpreter.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a patient has a pain level greater than 57 and additionally has no interpreter and additionally has a mobility rank greater than 35, it then is not pregnant. #2 Each time a patient is fasting and additionally is not ambulatory and additionally is not waitlisted, it then is not allergic. #3 Each time a patient is anemic and additionally has a fever reading of 42 or above, it then has no chaperone. #4 Each time a patient has a fever reading less than 61, it then is not waitlisted. #5 Each time a patient has a mobility rank greater than 57 and additionally has a pain level greater than 53, it then is fasting. #6 Each time a patient is fasting and additionally is ambulatory and additionally is not pregnant, it then is allergic. Question: Do the terms above show that Elif is allergic?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u031957", "pair_id": "u031957-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u031957-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8ea4a2f09eac09ca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u031968-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is shortlisted. Fomalhaut is multicenter. Fomalhaut has a steering committee. Capella is not cofunded. Electra is not cofunded. Fomalhaut is not preregistered. Capella is not preregistered. Electra is renewed. Deneb has no steering committee. Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Deneb has seed funding. Capella is renewed. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is not budgeted. Electra is preregistered. Deneb is not renewed. Deneb is not preregistered. Fomalhaut is not shortlisted. Fomalhaut is budgeted. Fomalhaut is not cofunded. Deneb is multicenter. Electra is not multicenter. Capella is multicenter.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is collaborative and is cofunded and is renewed, then it has no patent filing. (2) If a proposal has a steering committee, then it is embargoed. (3) If a proposal is embargoed and is budgeted, then it is collaborative. (4) If a proposal is preregistered, then it has no field site. (5) If a proposal is collaborative and is not cofunded and is budgeted, then it has a patent filing. (6) If a proposal is multicenter, then it has a field site. (7) If a proposal has no seed funding and is not budgeted and is not shortlisted, then it is not embargoed. (8) If a proposal has seed funding and is not renewed, then it is not collaborative. (5) is void if the proposal is not budgeted and has seed funding. When (5) and (1) clash, (5) prevails. When (2) and (7) clash, (2) prevails. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. When (8) and (3) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Is it true that Electra has a patent filing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031968", "pair_id": "u031968-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031968-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "02c8e9e967594aec", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u031968-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is shortlisted. Fomalhaut is multicenter. Fomalhaut has a steering committee. Capella is not cofunded. Electra is not cofunded. Fomalhaut is not preregistered. Capella is not preregistered. Electra is renewed. Deneb has no steering committee. Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Deneb has seed funding. Capella is renewed. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is not budgeted. Electra is not preregistered. Deneb is not renewed. Deneb is not preregistered. Fomalhaut is not shortlisted. Fomalhaut is budgeted. Fomalhaut is not cofunded. Deneb is multicenter. Electra is not multicenter. Capella is multicenter.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is collaborative and is cofunded and is renewed, then it has no patent filing. (2) If a proposal has a steering committee, then it is embargoed. (3) If a proposal is embargoed and is budgeted, then it is collaborative. (4) If a proposal is preregistered, then it has no field site. (5) If a proposal is collaborative and is not cofunded and is budgeted, then it has a patent filing. (6) If a proposal is multicenter, then it has a field site. (7) If a proposal has no seed funding and is not budgeted and is not shortlisted, then it is not embargoed. (8) If a proposal has seed funding and is not renewed, then it is not collaborative. (5) is void if the proposal is not budgeted and has seed funding. When (5) and (1) clash, (5) prevails. When (2) and (7) clash, (2) prevails. When (4) and (6) clash, (4) prevails. When (8) and (3) clash, (8) prevails. Question: Is it true that Electra has a patent filing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031968", "pair_id": "u031968-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031968-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d43856e94f55e24f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u031968-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is shortlisted. Fomalhaut is multicenter. Fomalhaut has a steering committee. Capella is not cofunded. Electra is not cofunded. Fomalhaut is not preregistered. Capella is not preregistered. Electra is renewed. Deneb has no steering committee. Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Deneb has seed funding. Capella is renewed. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is not budgeted. Electra is preregistered. Deneb is not renewed. Deneb is not preregistered. Fomalhaut is not shortlisted. Fomalhaut is budgeted. Fomalhaut is not cofunded. Deneb is multicenter. Electra is not multicenter. Capella is multicenter.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is collaborative, and is cofunded, and is renewed, that proposal has no patent filing. Item B. When the proposal has a steering committee, that proposal is embargoed. Item C. When the proposal is embargoed, and is budgeted, that proposal is collaborative. Item D. When the proposal is preregistered, that proposal has no field site. Item E. When the proposal is collaborative, and is not cofunded, and is budgeted, that proposal has a patent filing. Item F. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal has a field site. Item G. When the proposal has no seed funding, and is not budgeted, and is not shortlisted, that proposal is not embargoed. Item H. When the proposal has seed funding, and is not renewed, that proposal is not collaborative. Item E is suspended when the proposal is not budgeted, and has seed funding. Item E outranks Item A. Item B outranks Item G. Item D outranks Item F. Item H outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Electra has a patent filing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031968", "pair_id": "u031968-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031968-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "02c8e9e967594aec", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u031968-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Electra is shortlisted. Fomalhaut is multicenter. Fomalhaut has a steering committee. Capella is not cofunded. Electra is not cofunded. Fomalhaut is not preregistered. Capella is not preregistered. Electra is renewed. Deneb has no steering committee. Fomalhaut has no seed funding. Deneb has seed funding. Capella is renewed. Electra has a steering committee. Electra is not budgeted. Electra is not preregistered. Deneb is not renewed. Deneb is not preregistered. Fomalhaut is not shortlisted. Fomalhaut is budgeted. Fomalhaut is not cofunded. Deneb is multicenter. Electra is not multicenter. Capella is multicenter.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is collaborative, and is cofunded, and is renewed, that proposal has no patent filing. Item B. When the proposal has a steering committee, that proposal is embargoed. Item C. When the proposal is embargoed, and is budgeted, that proposal is collaborative. Item D. When the proposal is preregistered, that proposal has no field site. Item E. When the proposal is collaborative, and is not cofunded, and is budgeted, that proposal has a patent filing. Item F. When the proposal is multicenter, that proposal has a field site. Item G. When the proposal has no seed funding, and is not budgeted, and is not shortlisted, that proposal is not embargoed. Item H. When the proposal has seed funding, and is not renewed, that proposal is not collaborative. Item E is suspended when the proposal is not budgeted, and has seed funding. Item E outranks Item A. Item B outranks Item G. Item D outranks Item F. Item H outranks Item C. Question: Can one infer that Electra has a patent filing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u031968", "pair_id": "u031968-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u031968-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d43856e94f55e24f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u032005-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is registered. Jory is not perishable. Priya is not perishable. Jory has a postal zone of 82. Nandor is not prepaid. Jory is prepaid. Nandor has a postal zone of 45. Nandor is registered. Priya has a postal zone of 44.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is prepaid, thus it is not hazardous. Provision 2: when the parcel here is perishable, thus it is delayed. Provision 3: when the parcel here is hazardous, thus it has no locker slot. Provision 4: when the parcel here is registered, thus it is hazardous. Provision 5: when the parcel here has a postal zone at or below 52, thus it is not misrouted. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Jory is hazardous?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032005", "pair_id": "u032005-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032005-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "737be7c34da28aea", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032005-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is registered. Jory is not perishable. Priya is not perishable. Jory has a postal zone of 82. Nandor is not prepaid. Jory is prepaid. Nandor has a postal zone of 45. Nandor is registered. Jory is registered. Priya has a postal zone of 44.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is prepaid, thus it is not hazardous. Provision 2: when the parcel here is perishable, thus it is delayed. Provision 3: when the parcel here is hazardous, thus it has no locker slot. Provision 4: when the parcel here is registered, thus it is hazardous. Provision 5: when the parcel here has a postal zone at or below 52, thus it is not misrouted. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Jory is hazardous?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032005", "pair_id": "u032005-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032005-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b826246e2d9a8300", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032005-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is registered. Jory is not perishable. Priya is not perishable. Jory has a postal zone of 82. Nandor is not prepaid. Jory is prepaid. Nandor has a postal zone of 45. Nandor is registered. Priya has a postal zone of 44.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is prepaid, so it is not hazardous. No. 2 While the given parcel is perishable, so it is delayed. No. 3 While the given parcel is hazardous, so it has no locker slot. No. 4 While the given parcel is registered, so it is hazardous. No. 5 While the given parcel has a postal zone not above 52, so it is not misrouted. No. 4 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Jory is hazardous\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032005", "pair_id": "u032005-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032005-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "737be7c34da28aea", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032005-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya is registered. Jory is not perishable. Priya is not perishable. Jory has a postal zone of 82. Nandor is not prepaid. Jory is prepaid. Nandor has a postal zone of 45. Nandor is registered. Jory is registered. Priya has a postal zone of 44.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel is prepaid, so it is not hazardous. No. 2 While the given parcel is perishable, so it is delayed. No. 3 While the given parcel is hazardous, so it has no locker slot. No. 4 While the given parcel is registered, so it is hazardous. No. 5 While the given parcel has a postal zone not above 52, so it is not misrouted. No. 4 wins over No. 1. Question: Is the claim \"Jory is hazardous\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032005", "pair_id": "u032005-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/8", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032005-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b826246e2d9a8300", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032011-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra is monitored.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload has a GPU: then it is not provisioned. Policy II. Suppose that workload is containerized: then it has a dedicated host. Policy III. Suppose that workload has no GPU: then it is sandboxed. Policy IV. Suppose that workload has a GPU: then it has no dedicated host. Policy V. Suppose that workload is not monitored: then it is provisioned. Policy III is waived if that workload is monitored. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Sierra is containerized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032011", "pair_id": "u032011-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032011-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4916e6940a0df1ba", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032011-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Sierra has a GPU. Sierra is monitored.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload has a GPU: then it is not provisioned. Policy II. Suppose that workload is containerized: then it has a dedicated host. Policy III. Suppose that workload has no GPU: then it is sandboxed. Policy IV. Suppose that workload has a GPU: then it has no dedicated host. Policy V. Suppose that workload is not monitored: then it is provisioned. Policy III is waived if that workload is monitored. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy I. Question: Is it so that Sierra is containerized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032011", "pair_id": "u032011-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032011-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "043baa9beacfc364", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032032-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice is tagged. Gneiss is experimental. Pumice is backported. Pumice is not localized. Gneiss is localized. Pumice is not reverted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a security advisory, it thereby is compiled. Point B. If said build is tested, it thereby is profiled. Point C. If said build is localized, it thereby is not fuzzed. Point D. If said build is backported, it thereby has a security advisory. Point E. If said build is minified, it thereby is signed. Point F. If said build has a feature toggle, it thereby is tested. Point G. If said build is fuzzed, it thereby is versioned. Point H. If said build is obsolete, it thereby is merged. Point I. If said build is experimental, it thereby is flaky. Point J. If said build is reverted, it thereby is minified. Point K. If said build is notarized, it thereby is not signed. Point L. If said build is not localized, it thereby is fuzzed. Point M. If said build is fuzzed, it thereby is not compiled. Point N. If said build is notarized, it thereby is obsolete. Point K supersedes Point E. Point L supersedes Point C. Point M supersedes Point A. Question: Which choice is true for Pumice?", "options": ["is versioned", "is compiled", "is profiled", "is merged", "is signed"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is versioned", "unit_id": "u032032", "pair_id": "u032032-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/11/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032032-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "9922e2fb0aade530", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a4", "a11", "a7", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032032-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Pumice is tagged. Gneiss is experimental. Pumice is backported. Pumice is not localized. Gneiss is localized. Pumice is not reverted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a security advisory, it thereby is compiled. Point B. If said build is tested, it thereby is profiled. Point C. If said build is localized, it thereby is not fuzzed. Point D. If said build is backported, it thereby has a security advisory. Point E. If said build is minified, it thereby is signed. Point F. If said build has a feature toggle, it thereby is tested. Point G. If said build is fuzzed, it thereby is versioned. Point H. If said build is obsolete, it thereby is merged. Point I. If said build is experimental, it thereby is flaky. Point J. If said build is reverted, it thereby is minified. Point K. If said build is notarized, it thereby is not signed. Point L. If said build is localized, it thereby is fuzzed. Point M. If said build is fuzzed, it thereby is not compiled. Point N. If said build is notarized, it thereby is obsolete. Point K supersedes Point E. Point L supersedes Point C. Point M supersedes Point A. Question: Which choice is true for Pumice?", "options": ["is versioned", "is compiled", "is profiled", "is merged", "is signed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is compiled", "unit_id": "u032032", "pair_id": "u032032-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/11/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032032-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "a9b4d5f4b5dc89c8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a4", "a11", "a7", "a5"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032055-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ivo is not a graduate. Ivo has a notice period of 39. Olek is a graduate. Mads is onboarded. Ivo is not bilingual. Mads is bilingual. Ivo is relocating. Mads has a notice period of 64. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 58. Ivo is not onboarded. Mads has a background screening. Olek is not onboarded. Olek is relocating. Olek is not bilingual. Mads has an aptitude quotient of 15. Mads is not relocating. Mads is not a graduate. Ivo has no background screening.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is a graduate, it also has no mentor. Clause 2: once any candidate is bilingual, it also is licensed. Clause 3: once any candidate is seasoned and also has a notice period of 18 or less, it also is freelance. Clause 4: once any candidate is seasoned and also is relocating and also has an aptitude quotient under 50, it also has a diploma. Clause 5: once any candidate is seasoned and also has an aptitude quotient of 15 or less, it also is eligible. Clause 6: once any candidate has a background screening, it also is seasoned. Clause 7: once any candidate is seasoned and also has an aptitude quotient over 15 and also is bilingual, it also is recommended. Clause 2 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is onboarded. Question: Which of these is true of Mads?", "options": ["is recommended", "has a diploma", "is eligible"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is eligible", "unit_id": "u032055", "pair_id": "u032055-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032055-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9c4b9acdfd9230a1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a12", "a11", "a5"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u032055-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ivo is not a graduate. Ivo has a notice period of 39. Olek is a graduate. Mads is onboarded. Ivo is not bilingual. Mads is bilingual. Ivo is relocating. Mads has a notice period of 64. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 58. Ivo is not onboarded. Mads has a background screening. Olek is not onboarded. Olek is relocating. Olek is not bilingual. Mads has an aptitude quotient of 28. Mads is not relocating. Mads is not a graduate. Ivo has no background screening.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any candidate is a graduate, it also has no mentor. Clause 2: once any candidate is bilingual, it also is licensed. Clause 3: once any candidate is seasoned and also has a notice period of 18 or less, it also is freelance. Clause 4: once any candidate is seasoned and also is relocating and also has an aptitude quotient under 50, it also has a diploma. Clause 5: once any candidate is seasoned and also has an aptitude quotient of 15 or less, it also is eligible. Clause 6: once any candidate has a background screening, it also is seasoned. Clause 7: once any candidate is seasoned and also has an aptitude quotient over 15 and also is bilingual, it also is recommended. Clause 2 does not hold for a candidate when any candidate is onboarded. Question: Which of these is true of Mads?", "options": ["is recommended", "has a diploma", "is eligible"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is recommended", "unit_id": "u032055", "pair_id": "u032055-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032055-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8bc47afc727fbb9b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a12", "a11", "a5"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u032055-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ivo is not a graduate. Ivo has a notice period of 39. Olek is a graduate. Mads is onboarded. Ivo is not bilingual. Mads is bilingual. Ivo is relocating. Mads has a notice period of 64. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 58. Ivo is not onboarded. Mads has a background screening. Olek is not onboarded. Olek is relocating. Olek is not bilingual. Mads has an aptitude quotient of 15. Mads is not relocating. Mads is not a graduate. Ivo has no background screening.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is a graduate, that candidate has no mentor. Item B. When the candidate is bilingual, that candidate is licensed. Item C. When the candidate is seasoned, and has a notice period of no more than 18, that candidate is freelance. Item D. When the candidate is seasoned, and is relocating, and has an aptitude quotient of less than 50, that candidate has a diploma. Item E. When the candidate is seasoned, and has an aptitude quotient of no more than 15, that candidate is eligible. Item F. When the candidate has a background screening, that candidate is seasoned. Item G. When the candidate is seasoned, and has an aptitude quotient of more than 15, and is bilingual, that candidate is recommended. Item B is suspended when the candidate is onboarded. Question: What applies to Mads?", "options": ["is recommended", "has a diploma", "is eligible"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is eligible", "unit_id": "u032055", "pair_id": "u032055-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032055-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "9c4b9acdfd9230a1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a12", "a11", "a5"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u032055-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Ivo is not a graduate. Ivo has a notice period of 39. Olek is a graduate. Mads is onboarded. Ivo is not bilingual. Mads is bilingual. Ivo is relocating. Mads has a notice period of 64. Olek has an aptitude quotient of 58. Ivo is not onboarded. Mads has a background screening. Olek is not onboarded. Olek is relocating. Olek is not bilingual. Mads has an aptitude quotient of 28. Mads is not relocating. Mads is not a graduate. Ivo has no background screening.", "instruction": "Item A. When the candidate is a graduate, that candidate has no mentor. Item B. When the candidate is bilingual, that candidate is licensed. Item C. When the candidate is seasoned, and has a notice period of no more than 18, that candidate is freelance. Item D. When the candidate is seasoned, and is relocating, and has an aptitude quotient of less than 50, that candidate has a diploma. Item E. When the candidate is seasoned, and has an aptitude quotient of no more than 15, that candidate is eligible. Item F. When the candidate has a background screening, that candidate is seasoned. Item G. When the candidate is seasoned, and has an aptitude quotient of more than 15, and is bilingual, that candidate is recommended. Item B is suspended when the candidate is onboarded. Question: What applies to Mads?", "options": ["is recommended", "has a diploma", "is eligible"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is recommended", "unit_id": "u032055", "pair_id": "u032055-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/14/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032055-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "8bc47afc727fbb9b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a12", "a11", "a5"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u032063-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach is not longitudinal. Mirach is shortlisted. Kochab is not shortlisted. Kochab is multicenter.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has a field site provided that it has ethics clearance. Section 2: a proposal has no industry backing provided that it is shortlisted. Section 3: a proposal is not a pilot study provided that it has seed funding. Section 4: a proposal is a pilot study provided that it has seed funding. Section 5: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it is translational. Section 6: a proposal is renewed provided that it is collaborative. Section 7: a proposal has industry backing provided that it is renewed. Section 8: a proposal is not renewed provided that it is longitudinal. Section 9: a proposal has no field site provided that it has industry backing. Section 10: a proposal is translational provided that it is multicenter. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Kochab has a field site. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032063", "pair_id": "u032063-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032063-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "0e5ca3f7dd96d754", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u032063-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach is not longitudinal. Kochab is collaborative. Mirach is shortlisted. Kochab is not shortlisted. Kochab is multicenter.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has a field site provided that it has ethics clearance. Section 2: a proposal has no industry backing provided that it is shortlisted. Section 3: a proposal is not a pilot study provided that it has seed funding. Section 4: a proposal is a pilot study provided that it has seed funding. Section 5: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it is translational. Section 6: a proposal is renewed provided that it is collaborative. Section 7: a proposal has industry backing provided that it is renewed. Section 8: a proposal is not renewed provided that it is longitudinal. Section 9: a proposal has no field site provided that it has industry backing. Section 10: a proposal is translational provided that it is multicenter. Section 7 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 9 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Kochab has a field site. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032063", "pair_id": "u032063-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032063-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "12c7aa365f766eec", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u032063-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach is not longitudinal. Mirach is shortlisted. Kochab is not shortlisted. Kochab is multicenter.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance, it then has a field site. #2 Each time a proposal is shortlisted, it then has no industry backing. #3 Each time a proposal has seed funding, it then is not a pilot study. #4 Each time a proposal has seed funding, it then is a pilot study. #5 Each time a proposal is translational, it then has ethics clearance. #6 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then is renewed. #7 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then has industry backing. #8 Each time a proposal is longitudinal, it then is not renewed. #9 Each time a proposal has industry backing, it then has no field site. #10 Each time a proposal is multicenter, it then is translational. #2 yields to #7. #6 yields to #8. #3 yields to #4. #1 yields to #9. Question: Do the terms above show that Kochab has a field site?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032063", "pair_id": "u032063-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032063-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "0e5ca3f7dd96d754", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u032063-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mirach is not longitudinal. Kochab is collaborative. Mirach is shortlisted. Kochab is not shortlisted. Kochab is multicenter.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has ethics clearance, it then has a field site. #2 Each time a proposal is shortlisted, it then has no industry backing. #3 Each time a proposal has seed funding, it then is not a pilot study. #4 Each time a proposal has seed funding, it then is a pilot study. #5 Each time a proposal is translational, it then has ethics clearance. #6 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then is renewed. #7 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then has industry backing. #8 Each time a proposal is longitudinal, it then is not renewed. #9 Each time a proposal has industry backing, it then has no field site. #10 Each time a proposal is multicenter, it then is translational. #2 yields to #7. #6 yields to #8. #3 yields to #4. #1 yields to #9. Question: Do the terms above show that Kochab has a field site?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032063", "pair_id": "u032063-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032063-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "12c7aa365f766eec", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u032094-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has ethics clearance. Gemma is not translational. Capella is renewed. Capella is multicenter. Capella is cofunded. Gemma is theoretical. Gemma has no field site. Capella is not peer reviewed. Capella has ethics clearance. Capella is interdisciplinary. Gemma is peer reviewed. Gemma has no postdoc. Gemma is not renewed. Gemma is not a pilot study. Gemma is not multicenter. Gemma is not cofunded. Capella has a field site. Gemma is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is not peer reviewed and is cofunded, then it is budgeted. (2) If a proposal is not exploratory and is not multicenter, then it is not preregistered. (3) If a proposal is not preregistered and has no postdoc, then it is shortlisted. (4) If a proposal is renewed, then it is not embargoed. (5) If a proposal is not preregistered and is translational and has ethics clearance, then it is embargoed. (6) If a proposal is not preregistered and has a postdoc and has ethics clearance, then it has seed funding. (7) If a proposal is not preregistered and has a field site and has ethics clearance, then it has industry backing. (8) If a proposal has a steering committee and is a pilot study and is not interdisciplinary, then it is preregistered. (9) If a proposal has a field site, then it is not budgeted. (10) If a proposal is a pilot study, then it has a steering committee. (11) If a proposal is theoretical and is interdisciplinary and is not a pilot study, then it is not exploratory. (5) is void if the proposal has a field site. When (1) and (9) clash, (1) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (2) and (8) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Gemma?", "options": ["has industry backing", "is embargoed", "has seed funding", "is shortlisted"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is shortlisted", "unit_id": "u032094", "pair_id": "u032094-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032094-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "673fcfc4ed0b8e9b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a15", "a11", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032094-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has ethics clearance. Gemma is not translational. Capella is renewed. Capella is multicenter. Capella is cofunded. Gemma is theoretical. Gemma has no field site. Capella is not peer reviewed. Capella has ethics clearance. Capella is interdisciplinary. Gemma is peer reviewed. Gemma has a postdoc. Gemma is not renewed. Gemma is not a pilot study. Gemma is not multicenter. Gemma is not cofunded. Capella has a field site. Gemma is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal is not peer reviewed and is cofunded, then it is budgeted. (2) If a proposal is not exploratory and is not multicenter, then it is not preregistered. (3) If a proposal is not preregistered and has no postdoc, then it is shortlisted. (4) If a proposal is renewed, then it is not embargoed. (5) If a proposal is not preregistered and is translational and has ethics clearance, then it is embargoed. (6) If a proposal is not preregistered and has a postdoc and has ethics clearance, then it has seed funding. (7) If a proposal is not preregistered and has a field site and has ethics clearance, then it has industry backing. (8) If a proposal has a steering committee and is a pilot study and is not interdisciplinary, then it is preregistered. (9) If a proposal has a field site, then it is not budgeted. (10) If a proposal is a pilot study, then it has a steering committee. (11) If a proposal is theoretical and is interdisciplinary and is not a pilot study, then it is not exploratory. (5) is void if the proposal has a field site. When (1) and (9) clash, (1) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (2) and (8) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Gemma?", "options": ["has industry backing", "is embargoed", "has seed funding", "is shortlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has seed funding", "unit_id": "u032094", "pair_id": "u032094-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032094-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "88ce6b6044dffaa3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a15", "a11", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032094-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has ethics clearance. Gemma is not translational. Capella is renewed. Capella is multicenter. Capella is cofunded. Gemma is theoretical. Gemma has no field site. Capella is not peer reviewed. Capella has ethics clearance. Capella is interdisciplinary. Gemma is peer reviewed. Gemma has no postdoc. Gemma is not renewed. Gemma is not a pilot study. Gemma is not multicenter. Gemma is not cofunded. Capella has a field site. Gemma is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is not peer reviewed and also is cofunded, it also is budgeted. Clause 2: once any proposal is not exploratory and also is not multicenter, it also is not preregistered. Clause 3: once any proposal is not preregistered and also has no postdoc, it also is shortlisted. Clause 4: once any proposal is renewed, it also is not embargoed. Clause 5: once any proposal is not preregistered and also is translational and also has ethics clearance, it also is embargoed. Clause 6: once any proposal is not preregistered and also has a postdoc and also has ethics clearance, it also has seed funding. Clause 7: once any proposal is not preregistered and also has a field site and also has ethics clearance, it also has industry backing. Clause 8: once any proposal has a steering committee and also is a pilot study and also is not interdisciplinary, it also is preregistered. Clause 9: once any proposal has a field site, it also is not budgeted. Clause 10: once any proposal is a pilot study, it also has a steering committee. Clause 11: once any proposal is theoretical and also is interdisciplinary and also is not a pilot study, it also is not exploratory. Clause 5 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a field site. Clause 1 overrides Clause 9. Clause 4 overrides Clause 5. Clause 2 overrides Clause 8. Question: Which of these is true of Gemma?", "options": ["has industry backing", "is embargoed", "has seed funding", "is shortlisted"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is shortlisted", "unit_id": "u032094", "pair_id": "u032094-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032094-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "673fcfc4ed0b8e9b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a15", "a11", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032094-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has ethics clearance. Gemma is not translational. Capella is renewed. Capella is multicenter. Capella is cofunded. Gemma is theoretical. Gemma has no field site. Capella is not peer reviewed. Capella has ethics clearance. Capella is interdisciplinary. Gemma is peer reviewed. Gemma has a postdoc. Gemma is not renewed. Gemma is not a pilot study. Gemma is not multicenter. Gemma is not cofunded. Capella has a field site. Gemma is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any proposal is not peer reviewed and also is cofunded, it also is budgeted. Clause 2: once any proposal is not exploratory and also is not multicenter, it also is not preregistered. Clause 3: once any proposal is not preregistered and also has no postdoc, it also is shortlisted. Clause 4: once any proposal is renewed, it also is not embargoed. Clause 5: once any proposal is not preregistered and also is translational and also has ethics clearance, it also is embargoed. Clause 6: once any proposal is not preregistered and also has a postdoc and also has ethics clearance, it also has seed funding. Clause 7: once any proposal is not preregistered and also has a field site and also has ethics clearance, it also has industry backing. Clause 8: once any proposal has a steering committee and also is a pilot study and also is not interdisciplinary, it also is preregistered. Clause 9: once any proposal has a field site, it also is not budgeted. Clause 10: once any proposal is a pilot study, it also has a steering committee. Clause 11: once any proposal is theoretical and also is interdisciplinary and also is not a pilot study, it also is not exploratory. Clause 5 does not hold for a proposal when any proposal has a field site. Clause 1 overrides Clause 9. Clause 4 overrides Clause 5. Clause 2 overrides Clause 8. Question: Which of these is true of Gemma?", "options": ["has industry backing", "is embargoed", "has seed funding", "is shortlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has seed funding", "unit_id": "u032094", "pair_id": "u032094-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032094-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "88ce6b6044dffaa3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a15", "a11", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032094-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has ethics clearance. Gemma is not translational. Capella is renewed. Capella is multicenter. Capella is cofunded. Gemma is theoretical. Gemma has no field site. Capella is not peer reviewed. Capella has ethics clearance. Capella is interdisciplinary. Gemma is peer reviewed. Gemma has no postdoc. Gemma is not renewed. Gemma is not a pilot study. Gemma is not multicenter. Gemma is not cofunded. Capella has a field site. Gemma is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is not peer reviewed, and is cofunded, that proposal is budgeted. Item B. When the proposal is not exploratory, and is not multicenter, that proposal is not preregistered. Item C. When the proposal is not preregistered, and has no postdoc, that proposal is shortlisted. Item D. When the proposal is renewed, that proposal is not embargoed. Item E. When the proposal is not preregistered, and is translational, and has ethics clearance, that proposal is embargoed. Item F. When the proposal is not preregistered, and has a postdoc, and has ethics clearance, that proposal has seed funding. Item G. When the proposal is not preregistered, and has a field site, and has ethics clearance, that proposal has industry backing. Item H. When the proposal has a steering committee, and is a pilot study, and is not interdisciplinary, that proposal is preregistered. Item I. When the proposal has a field site, that proposal is not budgeted. Item J. When the proposal is a pilot study, that proposal has a steering committee. Item K. When the proposal is theoretical, and is interdisciplinary, and is not a pilot study, that proposal is not exploratory. Item E is suspended when the proposal has a field site. Item A outranks Item I. Item D outranks Item E. Item B outranks Item H. Question: What applies to Gemma?", "options": ["has industry backing", "is embargoed", "has seed funding", "is shortlisted"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is shortlisted", "unit_id": "u032094", "pair_id": "u032094-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032094-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "673fcfc4ed0b8e9b", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a15", "a11", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032094-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Gemma has ethics clearance. Gemma is not translational. Capella is renewed. Capella is multicenter. Capella is cofunded. Gemma is theoretical. Gemma has no field site. Capella is not peer reviewed. Capella has ethics clearance. Capella is interdisciplinary. Gemma is peer reviewed. Gemma has a postdoc. Gemma is not renewed. Gemma is not a pilot study. Gemma is not multicenter. Gemma is not cofunded. Capella has a field site. Gemma is interdisciplinary.", "instruction": "Item A. When the proposal is not peer reviewed, and is cofunded, that proposal is budgeted. Item B. When the proposal is not exploratory, and is not multicenter, that proposal is not preregistered. Item C. When the proposal is not preregistered, and has no postdoc, that proposal is shortlisted. Item D. When the proposal is renewed, that proposal is not embargoed. Item E. When the proposal is not preregistered, and is translational, and has ethics clearance, that proposal is embargoed. Item F. When the proposal is not preregistered, and has a postdoc, and has ethics clearance, that proposal has seed funding. Item G. When the proposal is not preregistered, and has a field site, and has ethics clearance, that proposal has industry backing. Item H. When the proposal has a steering committee, and is a pilot study, and is not interdisciplinary, that proposal is preregistered. Item I. When the proposal has a field site, that proposal is not budgeted. Item J. When the proposal is a pilot study, that proposal has a steering committee. Item K. When the proposal is theoretical, and is interdisciplinary, and is not a pilot study, that proposal is not exploratory. Item E is suspended when the proposal has a field site. Item A outranks Item I. Item D outranks Item E. Item B outranks Item H. Question: What applies to Gemma?", "options": ["has industry backing", "is embargoed", "has seed funding", "is shortlisted"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has seed funding", "unit_id": "u032094", "pair_id": "u032094-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032094-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "88ce6b6044dffaa3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a15", "a11", "a14"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032109-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is longitudinal. Capella is embargoed. Capella is not resubmitted. Capella has a review mark of 46. Capella is cofunded.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is longitudinal while has a review mark beyond 80, thus it has industry backing. Provision 2: when the proposal here has a review mark beneath 46, thus it is budgeted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is budgeted, thus it is theoretical. Provision 4: when the proposal here is not theoretical while is resubmitted, thus it is not a pilot study. Provision 5: when the proposal here is theoretical while is embargoed while is cofunded, thus it is not translational. Provision 6: when the proposal here is theoretical while is not embargoed while is cofunded, thus it is translational. Provision 7: when the proposal here is theoretical, thus it has ethics clearance. Question: Would it be right to say that Capella is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032109", "pair_id": "u032109-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032109-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "b30e4947dfeba80b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032109-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is longitudinal. Capella is embargoed. Capella is not resubmitted. Capella has a review mark of 27. Capella is cofunded.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the proposal here is longitudinal while has a review mark beyond 80, thus it has industry backing. Provision 2: when the proposal here has a review mark beneath 46, thus it is budgeted. Provision 3: when the proposal here is budgeted, thus it is theoretical. Provision 4: when the proposal here is not theoretical while is resubmitted, thus it is not a pilot study. Provision 5: when the proposal here is theoretical while is embargoed while is cofunded, thus it is not translational. Provision 6: when the proposal here is theoretical while is not embargoed while is cofunded, thus it is translational. Provision 7: when the proposal here is theoretical, thus it has ethics clearance. Question: Would it be right to say that Capella is translational?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032109", "pair_id": "u032109-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032109-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "a80e60227b872fd5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032110-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is registered. Mirela is registered. Mirela has no barcode. Mirela is not hazardous. Ulla is labeled. Mirela is not stamped. Mirela is not labeled. Ulla has a barcode.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is registered and additionally is stamped and additionally is not hazardous, it then has no courier. #2 Each time a parcel has a barcode and additionally is labeled and additionally is stamped, it then is weighed. Question: Do the terms above show that Mirela has no courier?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032110", "pair_id": "u032110-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032110-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "be04e496524789f0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032110-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ulla is registered. Mirela is registered. Mirela has no barcode. Mirela is not hazardous. Ulla is labeled. Mirela is not stamped. Mirela is not labeled. Ulla has a barcode.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel is registered and additionally is stamped and additionally is not hazardous, it then has no courier. #2 Each time a parcel is registered and additionally is not stamped and additionally is not labeled, it then has a courier. #3 Each time a parcel has a barcode and additionally is labeled and additionally is stamped, it then is weighed. Question: Do the terms above show that Mirela has no courier?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032110", "pair_id": "u032110-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032110-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "0fb9cb011132c3b1", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032130-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile is hazardous. Odile has no barcode. Odile is misrouted. Odile is delayed. Odile is not palletized. Odile is not registered. Odile is perishable. Odile is undeliverable.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is not rerouted provided that it has a barcode. Section 2: a parcel is stamped provided that it is prepaid as well as is rerouted. Section 3: a parcel is consolidated provided that it is misrouted as well as is perishable. Section 4: a parcel has a courier provided that it is prepaid as well as is perishable as well as is hazardous. Section 5: a parcel has no courier provided that it is rerouted. Section 6: a parcel is not weighed provided that it is misrouted. Section 7: a parcel is fragile provided that it is misrouted. Section 8: a parcel is rerouted provided that it is not palletized. Section 9: a parcel is prepaid provided that it is undeliverable. Section 10: a parcel is weighed provided that it is undeliverable as well as is registered. Section 11: a parcel is not consolidated provided that it is undeliverable. Section 6 lapses for a parcel if it has a barcode as well as is delayed. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 11 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 10. Question: Which statement fits Odile?", "options": ["is stamped", "has a courier"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is stamped", "unit_id": "u032130", "pair_id": "u032130-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032130-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d30a1b07f931e8d3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a7"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u032130-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile is hazardous. Odile has no barcode. Odile is misrouted. Odile is delayed. Odile is not palletized. Odile is not registered. Odile is perishable. Odile is undeliverable.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is not rerouted provided that it has a barcode. Section 2: a parcel is stamped provided that it is prepaid as well as is rerouted. Section 3: a parcel is consolidated provided that it is misrouted as well as is perishable. Section 4: a parcel has a courier provided that it is prepaid as well as is perishable as well as is hazardous. Section 5: a parcel has no courier provided that it is rerouted. Section 6: a parcel is not weighed provided that it is misrouted. Section 7: a parcel is fragile provided that it is misrouted. Section 8: a parcel is rerouted provided that it is palletized. Section 9: a parcel is prepaid provided that it is undeliverable. Section 10: a parcel is weighed provided that it is undeliverable as well as is registered. Section 11: a parcel is not consolidated provided that it is undeliverable. Section 6 lapses for a parcel if it has a barcode as well as is delayed. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 8 takes precedence over Section 1. Section 11 takes precedence over Section 3. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 10. Question: Which statement fits Odile?", "options": ["is stamped", "has a courier"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a courier", "unit_id": "u032130", "pair_id": "u032130-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032130-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f949baa0a5ccdbd6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a7"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u032130-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile is hazardous. Odile has no barcode. Odile is misrouted. Odile is delayed. Odile is not palletized. Odile is not registered. Odile is perishable. Odile is undeliverable.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is not rerouted. #2 Each time a parcel is prepaid and additionally is rerouted, it then is stamped. #3 Each time a parcel is misrouted and additionally is perishable, it then is consolidated. #4 Each time a parcel is prepaid and additionally is perishable and additionally is hazardous, it then has a courier. #5 Each time a parcel is rerouted, it then has no courier. #6 Each time a parcel is misrouted, it then is not weighed. #7 Each time a parcel is misrouted, it then is fragile. #8 Each time a parcel is not palletized, it then is rerouted. #9 Each time a parcel is undeliverable, it then is prepaid. #10 Each time a parcel is undeliverable and additionally is registered, it then is weighed. #11 Each time a parcel is undeliverable, it then is not consolidated. #6 is set aside if a parcel has a barcode and additionally is delayed. #4 yields to #5. #1 yields to #8. #3 yields to #11. #10 yields to #6. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Odile?", "options": ["is stamped", "has a courier"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is stamped", "unit_id": "u032130", "pair_id": "u032130-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032130-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "d30a1b07f931e8d3", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a7"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u032130-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile is hazardous. Odile has no barcode. Odile is misrouted. Odile is delayed. Odile is not palletized. Odile is not registered. Odile is perishable. Odile is undeliverable.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has a barcode, it then is not rerouted. #2 Each time a parcel is prepaid and additionally is rerouted, it then is stamped. #3 Each time a parcel is misrouted and additionally is perishable, it then is consolidated. #4 Each time a parcel is prepaid and additionally is perishable and additionally is hazardous, it then has a courier. #5 Each time a parcel is rerouted, it then has no courier. #6 Each time a parcel is misrouted, it then is not weighed. #7 Each time a parcel is misrouted, it then is fragile. #8 Each time a parcel is palletized, it then is rerouted. #9 Each time a parcel is undeliverable, it then is prepaid. #10 Each time a parcel is undeliverable and additionally is registered, it then is weighed. #11 Each time a parcel is undeliverable, it then is not consolidated. #6 is set aside if a parcel has a barcode and additionally is delayed. #4 yields to #5. #1 yields to #8. #3 yields to #11. #10 yields to #6. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Odile?", "options": ["is stamped", "has a courier"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a courier", "unit_id": "u032130", "pair_id": "u032130-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/7/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032130-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f949baa0a5ccdbd6", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a7"]}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u032140-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Juno has a GPU. Kestrel is not cached. Sierra is not containerized. Tundra is containerized. Kestrel is containerized. Juno is not containerized. Tundra has a firewall. Juno has a firewall. Juno is cached. Kestrel has a GPU. Sierra is not sharded. Sierra has no firewall.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is not cached, then it is not idle. (2) If a workload is containerized, then it is idle. (3) If a workload has no firewall, then it has a snapshot. (4) If a workload is stateless, then it is replicated. (5) If a workload is cached, then it is not replicated. (6) If a workload is stateless, then it has no snapshot. (7) If a workload has no GPU, then it has a public endpoint. (8) If a workload is not containerized, then it is stateless. (6) is void if the workload has a GPU. (2) is void if the workload is sharded. (4) is void if the workload is containerized. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (6) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Juno?", "options": ["is idle", "is stateless"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is stateless", "unit_id": "u032140", "pair_id": "u032140-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032140-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8ba3cc9e15b1160a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032140-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Juno has a GPU. Kestrel is not cached. Sierra is not containerized. Tundra is containerized. Kestrel is containerized. Juno is containerized. Tundra has a firewall. Juno has a firewall. Juno is cached. Kestrel has a GPU. Sierra is not sharded. Sierra has no firewall.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is not cached, then it is not idle. (2) If a workload is containerized, then it is idle. (3) If a workload has no firewall, then it has a snapshot. (4) If a workload is stateless, then it is replicated. (5) If a workload is cached, then it is not replicated. (6) If a workload is stateless, then it has no snapshot. (7) If a workload has no GPU, then it has a public endpoint. (8) If a workload is not containerized, then it is stateless. (6) is void if the workload has a GPU. (2) is void if the workload is sharded. (4) is void if the workload is containerized. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. When (4) and (5) clash, (4) prevails. When (3) and (6) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Juno?", "options": ["is idle", "is stateless"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is idle", "unit_id": "u032140", "pair_id": "u032140-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032140-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e45ddb8674e33498", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032140-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Juno has a GPU. Kestrel is not cached. Sierra is not containerized. Tundra is containerized. Kestrel is containerized. Juno is not containerized. Tundra has a firewall. Juno has a firewall. Juno is cached. Kestrel has a GPU. Sierra is not sharded. Sierra has no firewall.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is not cached, that workload is not idle. Item B. When the workload is containerized, that workload is idle. Item C. When the workload has no firewall, that workload has a snapshot. Item D. When the workload is stateless, that workload is replicated. Item E. When the workload is cached, that workload is not replicated. Item F. When the workload is stateless, that workload has no snapshot. Item G. When the workload has no GPU, that workload has a public endpoint. Item H. When the workload is not containerized, that workload is stateless. Item F is suspended when the workload has a GPU. Item B is suspended when the workload is sharded. Item D is suspended when the workload is containerized. Item A outranks Item B. Item D outranks Item E. Item C outranks Item F. Question: What applies to Juno?", "options": ["is idle", "is stateless"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is stateless", "unit_id": "u032140", "pair_id": "u032140-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032140-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8ba3cc9e15b1160a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032140-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Juno has a GPU. Kestrel is not cached. Sierra is not containerized. Tundra is containerized. Kestrel is containerized. Juno is containerized. Tundra has a firewall. Juno has a firewall. Juno is cached. Kestrel has a GPU. Sierra is not sharded. Sierra has no firewall.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is not cached, that workload is not idle. Item B. When the workload is containerized, that workload is idle. Item C. When the workload has no firewall, that workload has a snapshot. Item D. When the workload is stateless, that workload is replicated. Item E. When the workload is cached, that workload is not replicated. Item F. When the workload is stateless, that workload has no snapshot. Item G. When the workload has no GPU, that workload has a public endpoint. Item H. When the workload is not containerized, that workload is stateless. Item F is suspended when the workload has a GPU. Item B is suspended when the workload is sharded. Item D is suspended when the workload is containerized. Item A outranks Item B. Item D outranks Item E. Item C outranks Item F. Question: What applies to Juno?", "options": ["is idle", "is stateless"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is idle", "unit_id": "u032140", "pair_id": "u032140-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032140-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e45ddb8674e33498", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a3", "a6"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032154-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia has a pain level of 73. Wendel has a pulse rate of 92. Wendel is not triaged. Wendel is not allergic. Zora has a pain level of 64. Xenia is triaged. Gunnar is discharged. Gunnar is vaccinated. Wendel is discharged. Wendel has no pacemaker. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 48. Xenia is vaccinated. Wendel is vaccinated. Gunnar has an interpreter. Gunnar is not allergic. Xenia has an interpreter. Wendel has a pain level of 32. Gunnar has a pain level of 61. Xenia is not discharged.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is not admitted provided that it has a pulse rate of 59 or higher as well as is not allergic as well as is vaccinated. Section 2: a patient is admitted provided that it has a pulse rate of 59 or higher as well as is allergic. Section 3: a patient is not bedridden provided that it is discharged as well as has a pain level of 31 or lower. Section 1 lapses for a patient if it has no interpreter as well as is not triaged. Question: Wendel is not admitted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032154", "pair_id": "u032154-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032154-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "c4ad14f341ce7fbf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032154-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xenia has a pain level of 73. Wendel has a pulse rate of 92. Wendel is not triaged. Wendel is not allergic. Zora has a pain level of 64. Xenia is triaged. Gunnar is discharged. Gunnar is vaccinated. Wendel is discharged. Wendel has no pacemaker. Gunnar has a pulse rate of 48. Xenia is vaccinated. Wendel is vaccinated. Gunnar has an interpreter. Gunnar is not allergic. Xenia has an interpreter. Wendel has a pain level of 32. Gunnar has a pain level of 61. Xenia is not discharged.", "instruction": "Section 1: a patient is not admitted provided that it has a pulse rate of 59 or higher as well as is not allergic as well as is vaccinated. Section 2: a patient is admitted provided that it has a pulse rate of 59 or higher as well as is allergic. Section 3: a patient is not bedridden provided that it is discharged as well as has a pain level of 52 or lower. Section 1 lapses for a patient if it has no interpreter as well as is not triaged. Question: Wendel is not admitted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032154", "pair_id": "u032154-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032154-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4e52d71533f59954", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": true}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032171-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is retired. Wanda is appraised. Zdenek is reimbursed. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Zdenek is indemnified. Zdenek is not appraised. Zdenek is retired. Yara is not appraised. Yara is not indemnified. Yara is uninsurable.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has no rider provided that it is reimbursed. Section 2: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it is reimbursed. Section 3: a policyholder is inspected provided that it is reimbursed. Section 4: a policyholder has a rider provided that it is not appraised. Section 5: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it is uninsurable. Section 6: a policyholder is not reinstated provided that it is indemnified. Section 6 lapses for a policyholder if it is appraised. Section 3 lapses for a policyholder if it is retired. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it is not retired. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Zdenek is inspected. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032171", "pair_id": "u032171-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032171-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cb66c8f0fd1e3dbd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032171-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is retired. Wanda is appraised. Zdenek is reimbursed. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Zdenek is indemnified. Zdenek is not appraised. Zdenek is retired. Yara is not appraised. Yara is not indemnified. Yara is uninsurable.", "instruction": "Section 1: a policyholder has no rider provided that it is reimbursed. Section 2: a policyholder is not inspected provided that it is reimbursed. Section 3: a policyholder is inspected provided that it is reimbursed. Section 4: a policyholder has a rider provided that it is not appraised. Section 5: a policyholder has flood coverage provided that it is uninsurable. Section 6: a policyholder is not reinstated provided that it is indemnified. Section 6 lapses for a policyholder if it is appraised. Section 3 lapses for a policyholder if it is retired. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it is appraised. Section 2 lapses for a policyholder if it is not retired. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 4. Section 3 takes precedence over Section 2. Question: Zdenek is inspected. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032171", "pair_id": "u032171-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032171-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c4c0ecf958b11e50", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032171-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is retired. Wanda is appraised. Zdenek is reimbursed. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Zdenek is indemnified. Zdenek is not appraised. Zdenek is retired. Yara is not appraised. Yara is not indemnified. Yara is uninsurable.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed: then it has no rider. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed: then it is not inspected. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed: then it is inspected. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is not appraised: then it has a rider. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is uninsurable: then it has flood coverage. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it is not reinstated. Policy VI is waived if that policyholder is appraised. Policy III is waived if that policyholder is retired. Policy II is waived if that policyholder is not retired. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy II. Question: Is it so that Zdenek is inspected?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032171", "pair_id": "u032171-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032171-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cb66c8f0fd1e3dbd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032171-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is retired. Wanda is appraised. Zdenek is reimbursed. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Zdenek is indemnified. Zdenek is not appraised. Zdenek is retired. Yara is not appraised. Yara is not indemnified. Yara is uninsurable.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed: then it has no rider. Policy II. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed: then it is not inspected. Policy III. Suppose that policyholder is reimbursed: then it is inspected. Policy IV. Suppose that policyholder is not appraised: then it has a rider. Policy V. Suppose that policyholder is uninsurable: then it has flood coverage. Policy VI. Suppose that policyholder is indemnified: then it is not reinstated. Policy VI is waived if that policyholder is appraised. Policy III is waived if that policyholder is retired. Policy II is waived if that policyholder is appraised. Policy II is waived if that policyholder is not retired. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy IV. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy II. Question: Is it so that Zdenek is inspected?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032171", "pair_id": "u032171-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032171-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c4c0ecf958b11e50", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032171-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is retired. Wanda is appraised. Zdenek is reimbursed. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Zdenek is indemnified. Zdenek is not appraised. Zdenek is retired. Yara is not appraised. Yara is not indemnified. Yara is uninsurable.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then has no rider. #2 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then is not inspected. #3 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then is inspected. #4 Each time a policyholder is not appraised, it then has a rider. #5 Each time a policyholder is uninsurable, it then has flood coverage. #6 Each time a policyholder is indemnified, it then is not reinstated. #6 is set aside if a policyholder is appraised. #3 is set aside if a policyholder is retired. #2 is set aside if a policyholder is not retired. #4 yields to #1. #2 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Zdenek is inspected?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032171", "pair_id": "u032171-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032171-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cb66c8f0fd1e3dbd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032171-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Yara is retired. Wanda is appraised. Zdenek is reimbursed. Zdenek is not uninsurable. Zdenek is indemnified. Zdenek is not appraised. Zdenek is retired. Yara is not appraised. Yara is not indemnified. Yara is uninsurable.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then has no rider. #2 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then is not inspected. #3 Each time a policyholder is reimbursed, it then is inspected. #4 Each time a policyholder is not appraised, it then has a rider. #5 Each time a policyholder is uninsurable, it then has flood coverage. #6 Each time a policyholder is indemnified, it then is not reinstated. #6 is set aside if a policyholder is appraised. #3 is set aside if a policyholder is retired. #2 is set aside if a policyholder is appraised. #2 is set aside if a policyholder is not retired. #4 yields to #1. #2 yields to #3. Question: Do the terms above show that Zdenek is inspected?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032171", "pair_id": "u032171-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "exception_remove", "edit_path": "/exceptions/2", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032171-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c4c0ecf958b11e50", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032251-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is not budgeted. Izar is not preregistered. Deneb has seed funding. Electra has a milestone total of 62. Electra is budgeted. Izar has a milestone total of 24. Nashira is not budgeted. Deneb has a milestone total of 19. Deneb has no industry backing. Electra has no industry backing.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is translational: then it is collaborative. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has a milestone total smaller than 25: then it is translational. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is preregistered: then it is theoretical. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has industry backing: then it is not translational. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is budgeted: then it is interdisciplinary. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it is not collaborative. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy VI. Question: Is it so that Deneb is collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032251", "pair_id": "u032251-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032251-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7bbfde646cf7aee7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032251-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Izar is not budgeted. Izar is not preregistered. Deneb has seed funding. Electra has a milestone total of 62. Electra is budgeted. Izar has a milestone total of 24. Deneb is preregistered. Nashira is not budgeted. Deneb has a milestone total of 19. Deneb has no industry backing. Electra has no industry backing.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is translational: then it is collaborative. Policy II. Suppose that proposal has a milestone total smaller than 25: then it is translational. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is preregistered: then it is theoretical. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal has industry backing: then it is not translational. Policy V. Suppose that proposal is budgeted: then it is interdisciplinary. Policy VI. Suppose that proposal is theoretical: then it is not collaborative. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy VI. Question: Is it so that Deneb is collaborative?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032251", "pair_id": "u032251-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032251-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4184305ade8fea8d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032254-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is a pilot study. Fomalhaut has no patent filing. Betelgeuse is not renewed. Kochab is renewed. Kochab is a pilot study. Kochab has a citation index of 3. Capella is renewed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is renewed: then it is endorsed. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is preregistered: then it has a steering committee. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a citation index smaller than 54: then it has ethics clearance. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it is preregistered. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a citation index smaller than 54: then it has no ethics clearance. Policy II is waived if that proposal has a patent filing plus is a pilot study. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Kochab has no ethics clearance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032254", "pair_id": "u032254-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032254-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7770dc39764814b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u032254-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is a pilot study. Fomalhaut has no patent filing. Betelgeuse is not renewed. Kochab is renewed. Kochab is a pilot study. Kochab has a citation index of 3. Capella is renewed.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is renewed: then it is endorsed. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is preregistered: then it has a steering committee. Policy III. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a citation index smaller than 54: then it has ethics clearance. Policy IV. Suppose that proposal is a pilot study: then it is preregistered. Policy V. Suppose that proposal has a steering committee plus has a citation index no lower than 54: then it has no ethics clearance. Policy II is waived if that proposal has a patent filing plus is a pilot study. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Kochab has no ethics clearance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032254", "pair_id": "u032254-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032254-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "09d5d406ac990b84", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u032254-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is a pilot study. Fomalhaut has no patent filing. Betelgeuse is not renewed. Kochab is renewed. Kochab is a pilot study. Kochab has a citation index of 3. Capella is renewed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is endorsed. #2 Each time a proposal is preregistered, it then has a steering committee. #3 Each time a proposal has a steering committee and additionally has a citation index less than 54, it then has ethics clearance. #4 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then is preregistered. #5 Each time a proposal has a steering committee and additionally has a citation index less than 54, it then has no ethics clearance. #2 is set aside if a proposal has a patent filing and additionally is a pilot study. #3 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Kochab has no ethics clearance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032254", "pair_id": "u032254-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032254-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7770dc39764814b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u032254-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Capella is not a pilot study. Betelgeuse has a patent filing. Betelgeuse is a pilot study. Fomalhaut has no patent filing. Betelgeuse is not renewed. Kochab is renewed. Kochab is a pilot study. Kochab has a citation index of 3. Capella is renewed.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is endorsed. #2 Each time a proposal is preregistered, it then has a steering committee. #3 Each time a proposal has a steering committee and additionally has a citation index less than 54, it then has ethics clearance. #4 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then is preregistered. #5 Each time a proposal has a steering committee and additionally has a citation index of 54 or above, it then has no ethics clearance. #2 is set aside if a proposal has a patent filing and additionally is a pilot study. #3 yields to #5. Question: Do the terms above show that Kochab has no ethics clearance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032254", "pair_id": "u032254-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/op", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032254-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "09d5d406ac990b84", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u032359-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not compiled. Talc has a test yield of 27. Galena is experimental. Talc is notarized. Talc is compiled. Galena has a test yield of 80. Talc has a patch cycle of 53. Talc is linted. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 65. Galena is not reverted. Gneiss is notarized. Galena has a lint backlog of 80. Talc is not profiled. Galena is linted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is not merged. Policy II. Suppose that build is signed plus has a test yield no higher than 74: then it is backported. Policy III. Suppose that build is signed plus has a test yield higher than 74: then it is not backported. Policy IV. Suppose that build is notarized: then it is documented. Policy V. Suppose that build has a patch cycle higher than 37: then it is minified. Policy VI. Suppose that build is compiled: then it is merged. Policy VII. Suppose that build is merged plus is compiled: then it is signed. Policy VIII. Suppose that build has a changelog plus has a test yield smaller than 27: then it is not signed. Policy IX. Suppose that build is linted: then it is not documented. Policy X. Suppose that build is profiled: then it is not minified. Policy XI. Suppose that build is reverted plus has a lint backlog higher than 11: then it has a security advisory. Policy XII. Suppose that build is localized plus is notarized plus has a patch cycle smaller than 79: then it has a changelog. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VIII. Question: Is it so that Talc is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032359", "pair_id": "u032359-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032359-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f63b1a8a48b99161", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u032359-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not compiled. Talc has a test yield of 89. Galena is experimental. Talc is notarized. Talc is compiled. Galena has a test yield of 80. Talc has a patch cycle of 53. Talc is linted. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 65. Galena is not reverted. Gneiss is notarized. Galena has a lint backlog of 80. Talc is not profiled. Galena is linted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is not merged. Policy II. Suppose that build is signed plus has a test yield no higher than 74: then it is backported. Policy III. Suppose that build is signed plus has a test yield higher than 74: then it is not backported. Policy IV. Suppose that build is notarized: then it is documented. Policy V. Suppose that build has a patch cycle higher than 37: then it is minified. Policy VI. Suppose that build is compiled: then it is merged. Policy VII. Suppose that build is merged plus is compiled: then it is signed. Policy VIII. Suppose that build has a changelog plus has a test yield smaller than 27: then it is not signed. Policy IX. Suppose that build is linted: then it is not documented. Policy X. Suppose that build is profiled: then it is not minified. Policy XI. Suppose that build is reverted plus has a lint backlog higher than 11: then it has a security advisory. Policy XII. Suppose that build is localized plus is notarized plus has a patch cycle smaller than 79: then it has a changelog. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy IX. In a clash, Policy X beats Policy V. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy I. In a clash, Policy VII beats Policy VIII. Question: Is it so that Talc is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032359", "pair_id": "u032359-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032359-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1519e7255c88d1e3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u032359-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not compiled. Talc has a test yield of 27. Galena is experimental. Talc is notarized. Talc is compiled. Galena has a test yield of 80. Talc has a patch cycle of 53. Talc is linted. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 65. Galena is not reverted. Gneiss is notarized. Galena has a lint backlog of 80. Talc is not profiled. Galena is linted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is experimental, it then is not merged. #2 Each time a build is signed and additionally has a test yield of 74 or below, it then is backported. #3 Each time a build is signed and additionally has a test yield greater than 74, it then is not backported. #4 Each time a build is notarized, it then is documented. #5 Each time a build has a patch cycle greater than 37, it then is minified. #6 Each time a build is compiled, it then is merged. #7 Each time a build is merged and additionally is compiled, it then is signed. #8 Each time a build has a changelog and additionally has a test yield less than 27, it then is not signed. #9 Each time a build is linted, it then is not documented. #10 Each time a build is profiled, it then is not minified. #11 Each time a build is reverted and additionally has a lint backlog greater than 11, it then has a security advisory. #12 Each time a build is localized and additionally is notarized and additionally has a patch cycle less than 79, it then has a changelog. #2 yields to #3. #9 yields to #4. #5 yields to #10. #1 yields to #6. #8 yields to #7. Question: Do the terms above show that Talc is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032359", "pair_id": "u032359-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032359-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f63b1a8a48b99161", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u032359-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is not compiled. Talc has a test yield of 89. Galena is experimental. Talc is notarized. Talc is compiled. Galena has a test yield of 80. Talc has a patch cycle of 53. Talc is linted. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 65. Galena is not reverted. Gneiss is notarized. Galena has a lint backlog of 80. Talc is not profiled. Galena is linted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is experimental, it then is not merged. #2 Each time a build is signed and additionally has a test yield of 74 or below, it then is backported. #3 Each time a build is signed and additionally has a test yield greater than 74, it then is not backported. #4 Each time a build is notarized, it then is documented. #5 Each time a build has a patch cycle greater than 37, it then is minified. #6 Each time a build is compiled, it then is merged. #7 Each time a build is merged and additionally is compiled, it then is signed. #8 Each time a build has a changelog and additionally has a test yield less than 27, it then is not signed. #9 Each time a build is linted, it then is not documented. #10 Each time a build is profiled, it then is not minified. #11 Each time a build is reverted and additionally has a lint backlog greater than 11, it then has a security advisory. #12 Each time a build is localized and additionally is notarized and additionally has a patch cycle less than 79, it then has a changelog. #2 yields to #3. #9 yields to #4. #5 yields to #10. #1 yields to #6. #8 yields to #7. Question: Do the terms above show that Talc is backported?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032359", "pair_id": "u032359-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032359-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1519e7255c88d1e3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u032374-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not fragile. Liesel is registered. Liesel is rerouted. Liesel is oversized. Liesel is not misrouted. Liesel is damaged.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is sealed while is misrouted while is damaged, thus it is refrigerated. Provision 2: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it is stamped. Provision 3: when the parcel here is registered while is oversized, thus it is weighed. Provision 4: when the parcel here is palletized while is rerouted, thus it is not stamped. Provision 5: when the parcel here is damaged while is not fragile, thus it has no barcode. Provision 6: when the parcel here is delayed, thus it has a barcode. Provision 7: when the parcel here is sealed while is damaged while is rerouted, thus it is not refrigerated. Provision 8: when the parcel here is weighed, thus it is sealed. Provision 9: when the parcel here is oversized, thus it is not weighed. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Would it be right to say that Liesel is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032374", "pair_id": "u032374-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032374-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "641385e482debe38", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032374-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not fragile. Liesel is registered. Liesel is rerouted. Liesel is oversized. Liesel is not misrouted. Liesel is damaged.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here is sealed while is misrouted while is damaged, thus it is refrigerated. Provision 2: when the parcel here is rerouted, thus it is stamped. Provision 3: when the parcel here is registered while is oversized, thus it is weighed. Provision 4: when the parcel here is palletized while is rerouted, thus it is not stamped. Provision 5: when the parcel here is damaged while is fragile, thus it has no barcode. Provision 6: when the parcel here is delayed, thus it has a barcode. Provision 7: when the parcel here is sealed while is damaged while is rerouted, thus it is not refrigerated. Provision 8: when the parcel here is weighed, thus it is sealed. Provision 9: when the parcel here is oversized, thus it is not weighed. Provision 3 has priority over Provision 9. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 5. Provision 1 has priority over Provision 7. Question: Would it be right to say that Liesel is refrigerated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032374", "pair_id": "u032374-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032374-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f2d8f82d09cf86ed", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032374-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not fragile. Liesel is registered. Liesel is rerouted. Liesel is oversized. Liesel is not misrouted. Liesel is damaged.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is sealed and further is misrouted and further is damaged, it thereby is refrigerated. Point B. If said parcel is rerouted, it thereby is stamped. Point C. If said parcel is registered and further is oversized, it thereby is weighed. Point D. If said parcel is palletized and further is rerouted, it thereby is not stamped. Point E. If said parcel is damaged and further is not fragile, it thereby has no barcode. Point F. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby has a barcode. Point G. If said parcel is sealed and further is damaged and further is rerouted, it thereby is not refrigerated. Point H. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby is sealed. Point I. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby is not weighed. Point C supersedes Point I. Point B supersedes Point D. Point F supersedes Point E. Point A supersedes Point G. Question: Statement: Liesel is refrigerated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032374", "pair_id": "u032374-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032374-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "641385e482debe38", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032374-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Liesel is not fragile. Liesel is registered. Liesel is rerouted. Liesel is oversized. Liesel is not misrouted. Liesel is damaged.", "instruction": "Point A. If said parcel is sealed and further is misrouted and further is damaged, it thereby is refrigerated. Point B. If said parcel is rerouted, it thereby is stamped. Point C. If said parcel is registered and further is oversized, it thereby is weighed. Point D. If said parcel is palletized and further is rerouted, it thereby is not stamped. Point E. If said parcel is damaged and further is fragile, it thereby has no barcode. Point F. If said parcel is delayed, it thereby has a barcode. Point G. If said parcel is sealed and further is damaged and further is rerouted, it thereby is not refrigerated. Point H. If said parcel is weighed, it thereby is sealed. Point I. If said parcel is oversized, it thereby is not weighed. Point C supersedes Point I. Point B supersedes Point D. Point F supersedes Point E. Point A supersedes Point G. Question: Statement: Liesel is refrigerated. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032374", "pair_id": "u032374-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/1/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032374-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f2d8f82d09cf86ed", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032386-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is registered. Nandor is perishable. Priya is registered. Odile is not registered. Priya is not perishable. Rasmus is not perishable. Rasmus is registered. Nandor is hazardous. Nandor has no courier. Odile is perishable. Priya is hazardous. Odile is not hazardous. Rasmus is weighed. Rasmus is hazardous. Nandor is not weighed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here has a courier while is not weighed, thus it is rerouted. Provision 2: when the parcel here is registered, thus it is damaged. Provision 3: when the parcel here is not hazardous while is weighed, thus it is undeliverable. Provision 4: when the parcel here is perishable while is not registered, thus it is tracked. Provision 5: when the parcel here is perishable while is registered, thus it is prepaid. Question: Which one describes Nandor?", "options": ["is prepaid", "is tracked"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prepaid", "unit_id": "u032386", "pair_id": "u032386-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032386-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "436fcf3f185fa82f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032386-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is not registered. Nandor is perishable. Priya is registered. Odile is not registered. Priya is not perishable. Rasmus is not perishable. Rasmus is registered. Nandor is hazardous. Nandor has no courier. Odile is perishable. Priya is hazardous. Odile is not hazardous. Rasmus is weighed. Rasmus is hazardous. Nandor is not weighed.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the parcel here has a courier while is not weighed, thus it is rerouted. Provision 2: when the parcel here is registered, thus it is damaged. Provision 3: when the parcel here is not hazardous while is weighed, thus it is undeliverable. Provision 4: when the parcel here is perishable while is not registered, thus it is tracked. Provision 5: when the parcel here is perishable while is registered, thus it is prepaid. Question: Which one describes Nandor?", "options": ["is prepaid", "is tracked"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u032386", "pair_id": "u032386-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032386-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "de0df9c1e75dfcb1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032386-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is registered. Nandor is perishable. Priya is registered. Odile is not registered. Priya is not perishable. Rasmus is not perishable. Rasmus is registered. Nandor is hazardous. Nandor has no courier. Odile is perishable. Priya is hazardous. Odile is not hazardous. Rasmus is weighed. Rasmus is hazardous. Nandor is not weighed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel has a courier and likewise is not weighed, so it is rerouted. No. 2 While the given parcel is registered, so it is damaged. No. 3 While the given parcel is not hazardous and likewise is weighed, so it is undeliverable. No. 4 While the given parcel is perishable and likewise is not registered, so it is tracked. No. 5 While the given parcel is perishable and likewise is registered, so it is prepaid. Question: Select what holds for Nandor: which option?", "options": ["is prepaid", "is tracked"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is prepaid", "unit_id": "u032386", "pair_id": "u032386-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032386-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "436fcf3f185fa82f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032386-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Nandor is not registered. Nandor is perishable. Priya is registered. Odile is not registered. Priya is not perishable. Rasmus is not perishable. Rasmus is registered. Nandor is hazardous. Nandor has no courier. Odile is perishable. Priya is hazardous. Odile is not hazardous. Rasmus is weighed. Rasmus is hazardous. Nandor is not weighed.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given parcel has a courier and likewise is not weighed, so it is rerouted. No. 2 While the given parcel is registered, so it is damaged. No. 3 While the given parcel is not hazardous and likewise is weighed, so it is undeliverable. No. 4 While the given parcel is perishable and likewise is not registered, so it is tracked. No. 5 While the given parcel is perishable and likewise is registered, so it is prepaid. Question: Select what holds for Nandor: which option?", "options": ["is prepaid", "is tracked"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is tracked", "unit_id": "u032386", "pair_id": "u032386-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032386-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "de0df9c1e75dfcb1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a9"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032406-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel is not backed up. Juno has no firewall. Kestrel is stateless. Juno is containerized. Kestrel is not containerized. Juno is stateless.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload has a snapshot provided that it is stateless. Section 2: a workload is not sharded provided that it has a snapshot. Section 3: a workload has a public endpoint provided that it has a snapshot. Section 4: a workload is deprecated provided that it is isolated. Section 5: a workload is sharded provided that it is backed up. Section 6: a workload has no public endpoint provided that it has no snapshot. Section 7: a workload is not provisioned provided that it is containerized. Section 4 lapses for a workload if it is backed up. Section 3 lapses for a workload if it is backed up. Section 6 lapses for a workload if it has a firewall. Section 7 lapses for a workload if it is backed up. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it is backed up. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Kestrel has a public endpoint. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032406", "pair_id": "u032406-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032406-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "574825d5eedd61b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032406-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel is not backed up. Juno has no firewall. Kestrel is stateless. Juno is containerized. Kestrel is not containerized. Juno is stateless.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload has a snapshot provided that it is stateless. Section 2: a workload is not sharded provided that it has a snapshot. Section 3: a workload has a public endpoint provided that it has a snapshot. Section 4: a workload is deprecated provided that it is isolated. Section 5: a workload is sharded provided that it is backed up. Section 6: a workload has no public endpoint provided that it has a snapshot. Section 7: a workload is not provisioned provided that it is containerized. Section 4 lapses for a workload if it is backed up. Section 3 lapses for a workload if it is backed up. Section 6 lapses for a workload if it has a firewall. Section 7 lapses for a workload if it is backed up. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it is backed up. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 6 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Kestrel has a public endpoint. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032406", "pair_id": "u032406-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032406-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6a5c9b539486b623", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032406-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel is not backed up. Juno has no firewall. Kestrel is stateless. Juno is containerized. Kestrel is not containerized. Juno is stateless.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is stateless: then it has a snapshot. Policy II. Suppose that workload has a snapshot: then it is not sharded. Policy III. Suppose that workload has a snapshot: then it has a public endpoint. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is isolated: then it is deprecated. Policy V. Suppose that workload is backed up: then it is sharded. Policy VI. Suppose that workload has no snapshot: then it has no public endpoint. Policy VII. Suppose that workload is containerized: then it is not provisioned. Policy IV is waived if that workload is backed up. Policy III is waived if that workload is backed up. Policy VI is waived if that workload has a firewall. Policy VII is waived if that workload is backed up. Policy I is waived if that workload is backed up. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Kestrel has a public endpoint?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032406", "pair_id": "u032406-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032406-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "574825d5eedd61b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032406-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel is not backed up. Juno has no firewall. Kestrel is stateless. Juno is containerized. Kestrel is not containerized. Juno is stateless.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is stateless: then it has a snapshot. Policy II. Suppose that workload has a snapshot: then it is not sharded. Policy III. Suppose that workload has a snapshot: then it has a public endpoint. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is isolated: then it is deprecated. Policy V. Suppose that workload is backed up: then it is sharded. Policy VI. Suppose that workload has a snapshot: then it has no public endpoint. Policy VII. Suppose that workload is containerized: then it is not provisioned. Policy IV is waived if that workload is backed up. Policy III is waived if that workload is backed up. Policy VI is waived if that workload has a firewall. Policy VII is waived if that workload is backed up. Policy I is waived if that workload is backed up. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy III. Question: Is it so that Kestrel has a public endpoint?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032406", "pair_id": "u032406-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032406-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6a5c9b539486b623", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032406-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel is not backed up. Juno has no firewall. Kestrel is stateless. Juno is containerized. Kestrel is not containerized. Juno is stateless.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is stateless, it then has a snapshot. #2 Each time a workload has a snapshot, it then is not sharded. #3 Each time a workload has a snapshot, it then has a public endpoint. #4 Each time a workload is isolated, it then is deprecated. #5 Each time a workload is backed up, it then is sharded. #6 Each time a workload has no snapshot, it then has no public endpoint. #7 Each time a workload is containerized, it then is not provisioned. #4 is set aside if a workload is backed up. #3 is set aside if a workload is backed up. #6 is set aside if a workload has a firewall. #7 is set aside if a workload is backed up. #1 is set aside if a workload is backed up. #2 yields to #5. #3 yields to #6. Question: Do the terms above show that Kestrel has a public endpoint?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032406", "pair_id": "u032406-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032406-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "574825d5eedd61b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032406-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Kestrel is not backed up. Juno has no firewall. Kestrel is stateless. Juno is containerized. Kestrel is not containerized. Juno is stateless.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a workload is stateless, it then has a snapshot. #2 Each time a workload has a snapshot, it then is not sharded. #3 Each time a workload has a snapshot, it then has a public endpoint. #4 Each time a workload is isolated, it then is deprecated. #5 Each time a workload is backed up, it then is sharded. #6 Each time a workload has a snapshot, it then has no public endpoint. #7 Each time a workload is containerized, it then is not provisioned. #4 is set aside if a workload is backed up. #3 is set aside if a workload is backed up. #6 is set aside if a workload has a firewall. #7 is set aside if a workload is backed up. #1 is set aside if a workload is backed up. #2 yields to #5. #3 yields to #6. Question: Do the terms above show that Kestrel has a public endpoint?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032406", "pair_id": "u032406-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/5/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032406-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6a5c9b539486b623", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a0", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032407-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is signed. Quartz has a defect tally of 4. Obsidian has a defect tally of 9. Obsidian is linted. Shale has a defect tally of 35. Quartz is signed. Shale is not signed. Shale is not linted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a defect tally of less than 88, that build has a migration script. Item B. When the build is linted, that build has no migration script. Item C. When the build is signed, that build has a security advisory. Item D. When the build is linted, that build is fuzzed. Item E. When the build has a defect tally of more than 39, that build has no security advisory. Item B outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item E. Question: What applies to Obsidian?", "options": ["has a migration script", "is fuzzed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is fuzzed", "unit_id": "u032407", "pair_id": "u032407-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032407-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "10813a74624b9397", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u032407-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Obsidian is not signed. Quartz has a defect tally of 4. Obsidian has a defect tally of 9. Obsidian is linted. Shale has a defect tally of 35. Quartz is signed. Shale is not signed. Shale is not linted.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build has a defect tally of less than 88, that build has a migration script. Item B. When the build is linted, that build has no migration script. Item C. When the build is signed, that build has a security advisory. Item D. When the build is linted, that build is fuzzed. Item E. When the build has a defect tally of more than 39, that build has no security advisory. Item B outranks Item A. Item C outranks Item E. Question: What applies to Obsidian?", "options": ["has a migration script", "is fuzzed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is fuzzed", "unit_id": "u032407", "pair_id": "u032407-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032407-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "83a520eae2b678b2", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a1", "a4"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u032437-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel has no pacemaker. Xenia has no caregiver. Zora has no caregiver. Xenia has no pacemaker. Zora has a pulse rate of 99. Xenia has a pulse rate of 40.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it is referred. Provision 2: when the patient here has a pulse rate beyond 56, thus it is bedridden. Provision 3: when the patient here is allergic, thus it is rescheduled. Provision 4: when the patient here has a pulse rate beyond 40, thus it is allergic. Provision 5: when the patient here has a pulse rate at or below 40, thus it is postoperative. Provision 6: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it is not allergic. Provision 7: when the patient here is vaccinated, thus it is sedated. Provision 8: when the patient here has a caregiver, thus it is not bedridden. Provision 9: when the patient here is postoperative, thus it is vaccinated. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Which one describes Xenia?", "options": ["is vaccinated", "is rescheduled"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is vaccinated", "unit_id": "u032437", "pair_id": "u032437-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032437-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8eb22d8c2b5ddaff", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032437-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel has no pacemaker. Xenia has no caregiver. Zora has no caregiver. Xenia has no pacemaker. Zora has a pulse rate of 99. Xenia has a pulse rate of 47.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it is referred. Provision 2: when the patient here has a pulse rate beyond 56, thus it is bedridden. Provision 3: when the patient here is allergic, thus it is rescheduled. Provision 4: when the patient here has a pulse rate beyond 40, thus it is allergic. Provision 5: when the patient here has a pulse rate at or below 40, thus it is postoperative. Provision 6: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it is not allergic. Provision 7: when the patient here is vaccinated, thus it is sedated. Provision 8: when the patient here has a caregiver, thus it is not bedridden. Provision 9: when the patient here is postoperative, thus it is vaccinated. Provision 6 has priority over Provision 4. Provision 8 has priority over Provision 2. Question: Which one describes Xenia?", "options": ["is vaccinated", "is rescheduled"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is rescheduled", "unit_id": "u032437", "pair_id": "u032437-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032437-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fed9f8787076918f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a0", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032473-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zora has a mobility rank of 60. Cosima has no chaperone. Xenia has a fever reading of 22. Zora is allergic. Zora has no caregiver. Xenia has a chaperone. Cosima is not allergic. Zora has a chaperone.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is waitlisted: then it is triaged. Policy II. Suppose that patient is triaged: then it is diabetic. Policy III. Suppose that patient is bedridden: then it is sedated. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a mobility rank no lower than 59: then it has a pacemaker. Policy V. Suppose that patient is postoperative: then it is discharged. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is allergic: then it is waitlisted. Policy VII. Suppose that patient has no pacemaker: then it is postoperative. Policy VIII. Suppose that patient has a caregiver: then it is not anemic. Policy IX. Suppose that patient has a chaperone: then it is referred. Policy X. Suppose that patient is referred: then it is bedridden. Policy XI. Suppose that patient has a fever reading no higher than 52: then it has no pacemaker. Policy II is waived if that patient is not allergic. Policy III is waived if that patient is allergic. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy XI. Question: Which choice is right for Zora?", "options": ["is diabetic", "is discharged", "is sedated"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is diabetic", "unit_id": "u032473", "pair_id": "u032473-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032473-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6cbaf6cc92c09398", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a7", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032473-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Zora has a mobility rank of 60. Cosima has no chaperone. Xenia has a fever reading of 22. Zora is not allergic. Zora has no caregiver. Xenia has a chaperone. Cosima is not allergic. Zora has a chaperone.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that patient is waitlisted: then it is triaged. Policy II. Suppose that patient is triaged: then it is diabetic. Policy III. Suppose that patient is bedridden: then it is sedated. Policy IV. Suppose that patient has a mobility rank no lower than 59: then it has a pacemaker. Policy V. Suppose that patient is postoperative: then it is discharged. Policy VI. Suppose that patient is allergic: then it is waitlisted. Policy VII. Suppose that patient has no pacemaker: then it is postoperative. Policy VIII. Suppose that patient has a caregiver: then it is not anemic. Policy IX. Suppose that patient has a chaperone: then it is referred. Policy X. Suppose that patient is referred: then it is bedridden. Policy XI. Suppose that patient has a fever reading no higher than 52: then it has no pacemaker. Policy II is waived if that patient is not allergic. Policy III is waived if that patient is allergic. In a clash, Policy IV beats Policy XI. Question: Which choice is right for Zora?", "options": ["is diabetic", "is discharged", "is sedated"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is sedated", "unit_id": "u032473", "pair_id": "u032473-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032473-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ae6cf3ab35eda2ed", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a7", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032479-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile is palletized. Odile has a delivery window of 13. Priya has no waybill. Odile has a weight class of 93. Nandor is not fragile. Nandor has a parcel volume of 82. Priya has a postal zone of 22. Odile has a parcel volume of 67. Nandor has a delivery window of 22. Priya has a weight class of 22. Odile has no waybill. Odile has a postal zone of 53. Odile is fragile. Nandor is palletized. Nandor has a weight class of 55.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is refrigerated and also has a postal zone under 54, it also has a barcode. Clause 2: once any parcel is fragile and also has a postal zone under 79 and also has a weight class over 85, it also is not consolidated. Clause 3: once any parcel has no waybill and also has a parcel volume under 68, it also is damaged. Clause 4: once any parcel is refrigerated and also has a postal zone of 54 or more and also has a delivery window of 40 or less, it also has no barcode. Clause 5: once any parcel has no waybill, it also is not stamped. Clause 6: once any parcel is not consolidated and also is palletized, it also is refrigerated. Clause 4 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is not sealed. Clause 3 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel has a weight class of 35 or less. Question: Does it follow that Odile has a barcode?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032479", "pair_id": "u032479-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032479-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e518f531ec8d08d5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u032479-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Odile is palletized. Odile has a delivery window of 13. Priya has no waybill. Odile has a weight class of 93. Nandor is not fragile. Nandor has a parcel volume of 82. Priya has a postal zone of 22. Odile has a parcel volume of 67. Nandor has a delivery window of 22. Priya has a weight class of 22. Odile has no waybill. Odile has a postal zone of 64. Odile is fragile. Nandor is palletized. Nandor has a weight class of 55.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any parcel is refrigerated and also has a postal zone under 54, it also has a barcode. Clause 2: once any parcel is fragile and also has a postal zone under 79 and also has a weight class over 85, it also is not consolidated. Clause 3: once any parcel has no waybill and also has a parcel volume under 68, it also is damaged. Clause 4: once any parcel is refrigerated and also has a postal zone of 54 or more and also has a delivery window of 40 or less, it also has no barcode. Clause 5: once any parcel has no waybill, it also is not stamped. Clause 6: once any parcel is not consolidated and also is palletized, it also is refrigerated. Clause 4 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel is not sealed. Clause 3 does not hold for a parcel when any parcel has a weight class of 35 or less. Question: Does it follow that Odile has a barcode?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032479", "pair_id": "u032479-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/11/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032479-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "1a53ddc805332a28", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u032484-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra has a replica count of 25. Sierra has a replica count of 89. Sierra is not patched. Sierra has a snapshot. Sierra has a latency budget of 7. Zephyr has a latency budget of 80. Sierra is replicated. Zephyr is patched. Sierra is not sandboxed. Tundra is sandboxed. Sierra is throttled. Tundra has a snapshot.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is sandboxed: then it has a GPU. Policy II. Suppose that workload is stateless plus has a replica count no lower than 74: then it is virtualized. Policy III. Suppose that workload is stateless plus has a replica count smaller than 90: then it is not virtualized. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is throttled: then it is stateless. Policy V. Suppose that workload is patched plus has a snapshot: then it has a firewall. Policy VI. Suppose that workload has a replica count no higher than 32: then it has no firewall. Policy VII. Suppose that workload is virtualized: then it has no GPU. Policy VIII. Suppose that workload is sandboxed plus has a latency budget no higher than 26: then it is monitored. Policy VII is waived if that workload has a snapshot. Policy V is waived if that workload is replicated. Policy IV is waived if that workload is patched plus is throttled. Policy IV is waived if that workload is patched plus has a replica count no lower than 43. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy VII. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy V. Question: Is it so that Sierra is virtualized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032484", "pair_id": "u032484-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032484-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5687533264d4022b", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032484-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra has a replica count of 25. Sierra has a replica count of 89. Sierra is not patched. Sierra has a snapshot. Sierra has a latency budget of 7. Zephyr has a latency budget of 80. Sierra is replicated. Zephyr is patched. Sierra is not sandboxed. Tundra is sandboxed. Sierra is throttled. Tundra has a snapshot.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is sandboxed: then it has a GPU. Policy II. Suppose that workload is stateless plus has a replica count no lower than 74: then it is virtualized. Policy III. Suppose that workload is stateless plus has a replica count smaller than 74: then it is not virtualized. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is throttled: then it is stateless. Policy V. Suppose that workload is patched plus has a snapshot: then it has a firewall. Policy VI. Suppose that workload has a replica count no higher than 32: then it has no firewall. Policy VII. Suppose that workload is virtualized: then it has no GPU. Policy VIII. Suppose that workload is sandboxed plus has a latency budget no higher than 26: then it is monitored. Policy VII is waived if that workload has a snapshot. Policy V is waived if that workload is replicated. Policy IV is waived if that workload is patched plus is throttled. Policy IV is waived if that workload is patched plus has a replica count no lower than 43. In a clash, Policy III beats Policy II. In a clash, Policy I beats Policy VII. In a clash, Policy VI beats Policy V. Question: Is it so that Sierra is virtualized?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032484", "pair_id": "u032484-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032484-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ef9f60b496039cfd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032536-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas has no guarantor. Ingrid is foreclosed. Tomas is foreclosed. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 75. Tomas has a credit rating of 3. Tomas has a repayment grade of 89.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has a credit rating short of 15, it thereby is not garnished. Point B. If said borrower has no guarantor, it thereby is vetted. Point C. If said borrower has no collateral, it thereby is not audited. Point D. If said borrower is foreclosed, it thereby has no escrow account. Point E. If said borrower has no escrow account, it thereby has no collateral. Point F. If said borrower has a repayment grade of minimum 57, it thereby has an escrow account. Point G. If said borrower has no collateral, it thereby is audited. Point H. If said borrower is not garnished, it thereby has collateral. Point F is cancelled if said borrower has a debt ratio of maximum 62. Point G is cancelled if said borrower is employed. Point C is cancelled if said borrower is not employed. Point F supersedes Point D. Point E supersedes Point H. Point C supersedes Point G. Question: Statement: Tomas is audited. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032536", "pair_id": "u032536-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032536-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a256f3cb23bfc243", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032536-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas has no guarantor. Ingrid is foreclosed. Tomas is foreclosed. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 75. Tomas has a credit rating of 3. Tomas has a repayment grade of 18.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has a credit rating short of 15, it thereby is not garnished. Point B. If said borrower has no guarantor, it thereby is vetted. Point C. If said borrower has no collateral, it thereby is not audited. Point D. If said borrower is foreclosed, it thereby has no escrow account. Point E. If said borrower has no escrow account, it thereby has no collateral. Point F. If said borrower has a repayment grade of minimum 57, it thereby has an escrow account. Point G. If said borrower has no collateral, it thereby is audited. Point H. If said borrower is not garnished, it thereby has collateral. Point F is cancelled if said borrower has a debt ratio of maximum 62. Point G is cancelled if said borrower is employed. Point C is cancelled if said borrower is not employed. Point F supersedes Point D. Point E supersedes Point H. Point C supersedes Point G. Question: Statement: Tomas is audited. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032536", "pair_id": "u032536-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032536-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f133a9e1ee85433a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032536-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas has no guarantor. Ingrid is foreclosed. Tomas is foreclosed. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 75. Tomas has a credit rating of 3. Tomas has a repayment grade of 89.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has a credit rating that falls below 15, so it is not garnished. No. 2 While the given borrower has no guarantor, so it is vetted. No. 3 While the given borrower has no collateral, so it is not audited. No. 4 While the given borrower is foreclosed, so it has no escrow account. No. 5 While the given borrower has no escrow account, so it has no collateral. No. 6 While the given borrower has a repayment grade not below 57, so it has an escrow account. No. 7 While the given borrower has no collateral, so it is audited. No. 8 While the given borrower is not garnished, so it has collateral. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a debt ratio not above 62. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given borrower is employed. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given borrower is not employed. No. 6 wins over No. 4. No. 5 wins over No. 8. No. 3 wins over No. 7. Question: Is the claim \"Tomas is audited\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032536", "pair_id": "u032536-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032536-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a256f3cb23bfc243", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032536-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tomas has no guarantor. Ingrid is foreclosed. Tomas is foreclosed. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 75. Tomas has a credit rating of 3. Tomas has a repayment grade of 18.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has a credit rating that falls below 15, so it is not garnished. No. 2 While the given borrower has no guarantor, so it is vetted. No. 3 While the given borrower has no collateral, so it is not audited. No. 4 While the given borrower is foreclosed, so it has no escrow account. No. 5 While the given borrower has no escrow account, so it has no collateral. No. 6 While the given borrower has a repayment grade not below 57, so it has an escrow account. No. 7 While the given borrower has no collateral, so it is audited. No. 8 While the given borrower is not garnished, so it has collateral. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given borrower has a debt ratio not above 62. No. 7 stops applying as long as the given borrower is employed. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given borrower is not employed. No. 6 wins over No. 4. No. 5 wins over No. 8. No. 3 wins over No. 7. Question: Is the claim \"Tomas is audited\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c30", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032536", "pair_id": "u032536-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032536-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f133a9e1ee85433a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a10", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032549-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is tested. Obsidian is not flaky. Shale has a patch cycle of 3. Shale has a migration script. Shale is not versioned.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is not versioned and further has a patch cycle short of 75 and further has a migration script, it thereby is not reverted. Point B. If said build is versioned and further has a patch cycle of minimum 75 and further has a migration script, it thereby is reverted. Point C. If said build is tested and further has a patch cycle short of 54, it thereby has no feature toggle. Point D. If said build has a patch cycle of minimum 41, it thereby is reproducible. Point E. If said build has a patch cycle short of 78 and further is flaky, it thereby is merged. Point E is cancelled if said build has a patch cycle in excess of 25. Point B is cancelled if said build is versioned and further is signed. Point C is cancelled if said build has a patch cycle in excess of 69. Question: Statement: Shale is reverted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032549", "pair_id": "u032549-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032549-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f23ef71fe664865d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u032549-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is tested. Obsidian is not flaky. Shale has a patch cycle of 3. Shale has a migration script. Shale is not versioned.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build is versioned and further has a patch cycle short of 75 and further has a migration script, it thereby is not reverted. Point B. If said build is versioned and further has a patch cycle of minimum 75 and further has a migration script, it thereby is reverted. Point C. If said build is tested and further has a patch cycle short of 54, it thereby has no feature toggle. Point D. If said build has a patch cycle of minimum 41, it thereby is reproducible. Point E. If said build has a patch cycle short of 78 and further is flaky, it thereby is merged. Point E is cancelled if said build has a patch cycle in excess of 25. Point B is cancelled if said build is versioned and further is signed. Point C is cancelled if said build has a patch cycle in excess of 69. Question: Statement: Shale is reverted. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032549", "pair_id": "u032549-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032549-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a676fe84cb405158", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u032549-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is tested. Obsidian is not flaky. Shale has a patch cycle of 3. Shale has a migration script. Shale is not versioned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is not versioned and likewise has a patch cycle that falls below 75 and likewise has a migration script, so it is not reverted. No. 2 While the given build is versioned and likewise has a patch cycle not below 75 and likewise has a migration script, so it is reverted. No. 3 While the given build is tested and likewise has a patch cycle that falls below 54, so it has no feature toggle. No. 4 While the given build has a patch cycle not below 41, so it is reproducible. No. 5 While the given build has a patch cycle that falls below 78 and likewise is flaky, so it is merged. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given build has a patch cycle that exceeds 25. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build is versioned and likewise is signed. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given build has a patch cycle that exceeds 69. Question: Is the claim \"Shale is reverted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032549", "pair_id": "u032549-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032549-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "f23ef71fe664865d", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u032549-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Shale is tested. Obsidian is not flaky. Shale has a patch cycle of 3. Shale has a migration script. Shale is not versioned.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is versioned and likewise has a patch cycle that falls below 75 and likewise has a migration script, so it is not reverted. No. 2 While the given build is versioned and likewise has a patch cycle not below 75 and likewise has a migration script, so it is reverted. No. 3 While the given build is tested and likewise has a patch cycle that falls below 54, so it has no feature toggle. No. 4 While the given build has a patch cycle not below 41, so it is reproducible. No. 5 While the given build has a patch cycle that falls below 78 and likewise is flaky, so it is merged. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given build has a patch cycle that exceeds 25. No. 2 stops applying as long as the given build is versioned and likewise is signed. No. 3 stops applying as long as the given build has a patch cycle that exceeds 69. Question: Is the claim \"Shale is reverted\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c13", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032549", "pair_id": "u032549-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032549-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "a676fe84cb405158", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u032560-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tundra is not deprecated. Tundra has no firewall. Tundra is sharded.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is sandboxed, it also is virtualized. Clause 2: once any workload is encrypted, it also is not monitored. Clause 3: once any workload is not sharded, it also has a failover node. Clause 4: once any workload is patched, it also is not throttled. Clause 5: once any workload is deprecated, it also has no snapshot. Clause 6: once any workload is provisioned, it also is monitored. Clause 7: once any workload has no firewall, it also is provisioned. Clause 8: once any workload has no snapshot, it also is sandboxed. Clause 9: once any workload is not throttled, it also is cached. Clause 10: once any workload is not autoscaled, it also is patched. Clause 11: once any workload is monitored, it also is stateless. Clause 11 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not autoscaled. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Question: Which of these is true of Tundra?", "options": ["is virtualized", "is cached", "is stateless"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is stateless", "unit_id": "u032560", "pair_id": "u032560-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032560-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4da3b4d3b36fc5cf", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a6", "a0"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u032560-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tundra is not deprecated. Tundra is not autoscaled. Tundra has no firewall. Tundra is sharded.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is sandboxed, it also is virtualized. Clause 2: once any workload is encrypted, it also is not monitored. Clause 3: once any workload is not sharded, it also has a failover node. Clause 4: once any workload is patched, it also is not throttled. Clause 5: once any workload is deprecated, it also has no snapshot. Clause 6: once any workload is provisioned, it also is monitored. Clause 7: once any workload has no firewall, it also is provisioned. Clause 8: once any workload has no snapshot, it also is sandboxed. Clause 9: once any workload is not throttled, it also is cached. Clause 10: once any workload is not autoscaled, it also is patched. Clause 11: once any workload is monitored, it also is stateless. Clause 11 does not hold for a workload when any workload is not autoscaled. Clause 2 overrides Clause 6. Question: Which of these is true of Tundra?", "options": ["is virtualized", "is cached", "is stateless"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is cached", "unit_id": "u032560", "pair_id": "u032560-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032560-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2eec3e4735c4dc00", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a6", "a0"]}, "attempt": 10}}
{"id": "syn-u032573-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quasar is stateless. Nimbus is cached. Juno is not isolated. Quasar has a firewall. Tundra is provisioned. Nimbus is backed up. Tundra is encrypted. Tundra is idle. Nimbus is not isolated. Tundra has no firewall. Quasar is provisioned. Nimbus is autoscaled. Quasar is isolated. Tundra has a snapshot. Tundra is cached. Juno is not autoscaled. Quasar is not backed up. Tundra is autoscaled. Quasar is encrypted. Nimbus has no GPU. Nimbus is not encrypted. Quasar has no GPU.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is idle, then it is not replicated. (2) If a workload has a snapshot and has no firewall and is idle, then it is virtualized. (3) If a workload has a snapshot and has no GPU and is isolated, then it is throttled. (4) If a workload is not provisioned and is idle, then it has no public endpoint. (5) If a workload is not cached, then it is not sandboxed. (6) If a workload is encrypted, then it is not sandboxed. (7) If a workload is not backed up and has no GPU, then it is replicated. (8) If a workload has a snapshot and has a GPU, then it has a dedicated host. (9) If a workload has a snapshot and is not cached, then it is monitored. (10) If a workload has a snapshot and is stateless, then it is deprecated. (11) If a workload has a snapshot and is not idle, then it is sandboxed. (12) If a workload has a snapshot and has a firewall and is autoscaled, then it is containerized. (13) If a workload has a snapshot, then it has a public endpoint. When (7) and (1) clash, (7) prevails. When (4) and (13) clash, (4) prevails. When (11) and (6) clash, (11) prevails. When (5) and (11) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Tundra?", "options": ["is monitored", "is sandboxed", "is throttled", "is virtualized", "is containerized", "is deprecated", "has a dedicated host"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is virtualized", "unit_id": "u032573", "pair_id": "u032573-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032573-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "506d2603d329a769", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a5", "a15", "a16", "a11", "a19", "a1", "a14"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u032573-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quasar is stateless. Nimbus is cached. Juno is not isolated. Quasar has a firewall. Tundra is provisioned. Nimbus is backed up. Tundra is encrypted. Tundra is idle. Nimbus is not isolated. Tundra has a firewall. Quasar is provisioned. Nimbus is autoscaled. Quasar is isolated. Tundra has a snapshot. Tundra is cached. Juno is not autoscaled. Quasar is not backed up. Tundra is autoscaled. Quasar is encrypted. Nimbus has no GPU. Nimbus is not encrypted. Quasar has no GPU.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is idle, then it is not replicated. (2) If a workload has a snapshot and has no firewall and is idle, then it is virtualized. (3) If a workload has a snapshot and has no GPU and is isolated, then it is throttled. (4) If a workload is not provisioned and is idle, then it has no public endpoint. (5) If a workload is not cached, then it is not sandboxed. (6) If a workload is encrypted, then it is not sandboxed. (7) If a workload is not backed up and has no GPU, then it is replicated. (8) If a workload has a snapshot and has a GPU, then it has a dedicated host. (9) If a workload has a snapshot and is not cached, then it is monitored. (10) If a workload has a snapshot and is stateless, then it is deprecated. (11) If a workload has a snapshot and is not idle, then it is sandboxed. (12) If a workload has a snapshot and has a firewall and is autoscaled, then it is containerized. (13) If a workload has a snapshot, then it has a public endpoint. When (7) and (1) clash, (7) prevails. When (4) and (13) clash, (4) prevails. When (11) and (6) clash, (11) prevails. When (5) and (11) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Tundra?", "options": ["is monitored", "is sandboxed", "is throttled", "is virtualized", "is containerized", "is deprecated", "has a dedicated host"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is containerized", "unit_id": "u032573", "pair_id": "u032573-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032573-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "79161e3f79291e14", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a5", "a15", "a16", "a11", "a19", "a1", "a14"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u032573-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quasar is stateless. Nimbus is cached. Juno is not isolated. Quasar has a firewall. Tundra is provisioned. Nimbus is backed up. Tundra is encrypted. Tundra is idle. Nimbus is not isolated. Tundra has no firewall. Quasar is provisioned. Nimbus is autoscaled. Quasar is isolated. Tundra has a snapshot. Tundra is cached. Juno is not autoscaled. Quasar is not backed up. Tundra is autoscaled. Quasar is encrypted. Nimbus has no GPU. Nimbus is not encrypted. Quasar has no GPU.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is idle, it also is not replicated. Clause 2: once any workload has a snapshot and also has no firewall and also is idle, it also is virtualized. Clause 3: once any workload has a snapshot and also has no GPU and also is isolated, it also is throttled. Clause 4: once any workload is not provisioned and also is idle, it also has no public endpoint. Clause 5: once any workload is not cached, it also is not sandboxed. Clause 6: once any workload is encrypted, it also is not sandboxed. Clause 7: once any workload is not backed up and also has no GPU, it also is replicated. Clause 8: once any workload has a snapshot and also has a GPU, it also has a dedicated host. Clause 9: once any workload has a snapshot and also is not cached, it also is monitored. Clause 10: once any workload has a snapshot and also is stateless, it also is deprecated. Clause 11: once any workload has a snapshot and also is not idle, it also is sandboxed. Clause 12: once any workload has a snapshot and also has a firewall and also is autoscaled, it also is containerized. Clause 13: once any workload has a snapshot, it also has a public endpoint. Clause 7 overrides Clause 1. Clause 4 overrides Clause 13. Clause 11 overrides Clause 6. Clause 5 overrides Clause 11. Question: Which of these is true of Tundra?", "options": ["is monitored", "is sandboxed", "is throttled", "is virtualized", "is containerized", "is deprecated", "has a dedicated host"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is virtualized", "unit_id": "u032573", "pair_id": "u032573-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032573-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "506d2603d329a769", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a5", "a15", "a16", "a11", "a19", "a1", "a14"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u032573-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quasar is stateless. Nimbus is cached. Juno is not isolated. Quasar has a firewall. Tundra is provisioned. Nimbus is backed up. Tundra is encrypted. Tundra is idle. Nimbus is not isolated. Tundra has a firewall. Quasar is provisioned. Nimbus is autoscaled. Quasar is isolated. Tundra has a snapshot. Tundra is cached. Juno is not autoscaled. Quasar is not backed up. Tundra is autoscaled. Quasar is encrypted. Nimbus has no GPU. Nimbus is not encrypted. Quasar has no GPU.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload is idle, it also is not replicated. Clause 2: once any workload has a snapshot and also has no firewall and also is idle, it also is virtualized. Clause 3: once any workload has a snapshot and also has no GPU and also is isolated, it also is throttled. Clause 4: once any workload is not provisioned and also is idle, it also has no public endpoint. Clause 5: once any workload is not cached, it also is not sandboxed. Clause 6: once any workload is encrypted, it also is not sandboxed. Clause 7: once any workload is not backed up and also has no GPU, it also is replicated. Clause 8: once any workload has a snapshot and also has a GPU, it also has a dedicated host. Clause 9: once any workload has a snapshot and also is not cached, it also is monitored. Clause 10: once any workload has a snapshot and also is stateless, it also is deprecated. Clause 11: once any workload has a snapshot and also is not idle, it also is sandboxed. Clause 12: once any workload has a snapshot and also has a firewall and also is autoscaled, it also is containerized. Clause 13: once any workload has a snapshot, it also has a public endpoint. Clause 7 overrides Clause 1. Clause 4 overrides Clause 13. Clause 11 overrides Clause 6. Clause 5 overrides Clause 11. Question: Which of these is true of Tundra?", "options": ["is monitored", "is sandboxed", "is throttled", "is virtualized", "is containerized", "is deprecated", "has a dedicated host"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is containerized", "unit_id": "u032573", "pair_id": "u032573-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032573-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "79161e3f79291e14", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a5", "a15", "a16", "a11", "a19", "a1", "a14"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u032573-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quasar is stateless. Nimbus is cached. Juno is not isolated. Quasar has a firewall. Tundra is provisioned. Nimbus is backed up. Tundra is encrypted. Tundra is idle. Nimbus is not isolated. Tundra has no firewall. Quasar is provisioned. Nimbus is autoscaled. Quasar is isolated. Tundra has a snapshot. Tundra is cached. Juno is not autoscaled. Quasar is not backed up. Tundra is autoscaled. Quasar is encrypted. Nimbus has no GPU. Nimbus is not encrypted. Quasar has no GPU.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is idle, that workload is not replicated. Item B. When the workload has a snapshot, and has no firewall, and is idle, that workload is virtualized. Item C. When the workload has a snapshot, and has no GPU, and is isolated, that workload is throttled. Item D. When the workload is not provisioned, and is idle, that workload has no public endpoint. Item E. When the workload is not cached, that workload is not sandboxed. Item F. When the workload is encrypted, that workload is not sandboxed. Item G. When the workload is not backed up, and has no GPU, that workload is replicated. Item H. When the workload has a snapshot, and has a GPU, that workload has a dedicated host. Item I. When the workload has a snapshot, and is not cached, that workload is monitored. Item J. When the workload has a snapshot, and is stateless, that workload is deprecated. Item K. When the workload has a snapshot, and is not idle, that workload is sandboxed. Item L. When the workload has a snapshot, and has a firewall, and is autoscaled, that workload is containerized. Item M. When the workload has a snapshot, that workload has a public endpoint. Item G outranks Item A. Item D outranks Item M. Item K outranks Item F. Item E outranks Item K. Question: What applies to Tundra?", "options": ["is monitored", "is sandboxed", "is throttled", "is virtualized", "is containerized", "is deprecated", "has a dedicated host"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is virtualized", "unit_id": "u032573", "pair_id": "u032573-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032573-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "506d2603d329a769", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a5", "a15", "a16", "a11", "a19", "a1", "a14"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u032573-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Quasar is stateless. Nimbus is cached. Juno is not isolated. Quasar has a firewall. Tundra is provisioned. Nimbus is backed up. Tundra is encrypted. Tundra is idle. Nimbus is not isolated. Tundra has a firewall. Quasar is provisioned. Nimbus is autoscaled. Quasar is isolated. Tundra has a snapshot. Tundra is cached. Juno is not autoscaled. Quasar is not backed up. Tundra is autoscaled. Quasar is encrypted. Nimbus has no GPU. Nimbus is not encrypted. Quasar has no GPU.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is idle, that workload is not replicated. Item B. When the workload has a snapshot, and has no firewall, and is idle, that workload is virtualized. Item C. When the workload has a snapshot, and has no GPU, and is isolated, that workload is throttled. Item D. When the workload is not provisioned, and is idle, that workload has no public endpoint. Item E. When the workload is not cached, that workload is not sandboxed. Item F. When the workload is encrypted, that workload is not sandboxed. Item G. When the workload is not backed up, and has no GPU, that workload is replicated. Item H. When the workload has a snapshot, and has a GPU, that workload has a dedicated host. Item I. When the workload has a snapshot, and is not cached, that workload is monitored. Item J. When the workload has a snapshot, and is stateless, that workload is deprecated. Item K. When the workload has a snapshot, and is not idle, that workload is sandboxed. Item L. When the workload has a snapshot, and has a firewall, and is autoscaled, that workload is containerized. Item M. When the workload has a snapshot, that workload has a public endpoint. Item G outranks Item A. Item D outranks Item M. Item K outranks Item F. Item E outranks Item K. Question: What applies to Tundra?", "options": ["is monitored", "is sandboxed", "is throttled", "is virtualized", "is containerized", "is deprecated", "has a dedicated host"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is containerized", "unit_id": "u032573", "pair_id": "u032573-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032573-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "79161e3f79291e14", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e3", "candidates": ["a5", "a15", "a16", "a11", "a19", "a1", "a14"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u032574-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is oversized. Quentin is not fragile. Liesel has a barcode. Nandor is not oversized. Nandor is weighed. Mirela is not oversized. Mirela is weighed. Nandor is not fragile. Liesel is oversized. Quentin has a postal zone of 21. Liesel is fragile. Quentin is weighed. Quentin has no courier.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is registered provided that it has a postal zone of 52 or lower. Section 2: a parcel is not labeled provided that it has a postal zone lower than 22. Section 3: a parcel is not delayed provided that it is not labeled. Section 4: a parcel is delayed provided that it is not labeled. Section 5: a parcel is rerouted provided that it is not weighed. Section 6: a parcel is refrigerated provided that it is labeled. Section 2 lapses for a parcel if it is not oversized. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it is not fragile. Section 4 lapses for a parcel if it has a courier. Section 4 lapses for a parcel if it is fragile. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it has no barcode. Question: Quentin is not delayed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032574", "pair_id": "u032574-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032574-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d8b5ee4217f2df8f", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u032574-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quentin is oversized. Quentin is not fragile. Liesel has a barcode. Nandor is not oversized. Nandor is weighed. Mirela is not oversized. Quentin has no barcode. Mirela is weighed. Nandor is not fragile. Liesel is oversized. Quentin has a postal zone of 21. Liesel is fragile. Quentin is weighed. Quentin has no courier.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is registered provided that it has a postal zone of 52 or lower. Section 2: a parcel is not labeled provided that it has a postal zone lower than 22. Section 3: a parcel is not delayed provided that it is not labeled. Section 4: a parcel is delayed provided that it is not labeled. Section 5: a parcel is rerouted provided that it is not weighed. Section 6: a parcel is refrigerated provided that it is labeled. Section 2 lapses for a parcel if it is not oversized. Section 3 lapses for a parcel if it is not fragile. Section 4 lapses for a parcel if it has a courier. Section 4 lapses for a parcel if it is fragile. Section 1 lapses for a parcel if it has no barcode. Question: Quentin is not delayed. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c14", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032574", "pair_id": "u032574-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/6", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032574-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "4a954da30e6ae4b9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u032595-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is deprecated. Tundra is not containerized. Juno is not sharded. Sierra is sharded. Cobalt is patched. Cobalt is not containerized. Sierra is not mirrored. Cobalt is mirrored. Cobalt is not sharded. Cobalt is deprecated. Juno is patched.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is patched, so it is not idle. No. 2 While the given workload is patched, so it is idle. No. 3 While the given workload is containerized, so it is sandboxed. No. 4 While the given workload is mirrored, so it is not backed up. No. 5 While the given workload is idle, so it is monitored. No. 6 While the given workload is idle, so it is not monitored. No. 7 While the given workload is deprecated, so it is not sandboxed. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload is containerized. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given workload is sharded. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given workload is containerized. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given workload is not containerized. No. 6 wins over No. 5. No. 2 wins over No. 1. No. 3 wins over No. 7. Question: Is the claim \"Cobalt is monitored\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032595", "pair_id": "u032595-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032595-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2b307339e709d5bd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032595-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Juno is deprecated. Tundra is not containerized. Juno is not sharded. Sierra is sharded. Cobalt is patched. Cobalt is not containerized. Sierra is not mirrored. Cobalt is mirrored. Cobalt is sharded. Cobalt is deprecated. Juno is patched.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is patched, so it is not idle. No. 2 While the given workload is patched, so it is idle. No. 3 While the given workload is containerized, so it is sandboxed. No. 4 While the given workload is mirrored, so it is not backed up. No. 5 While the given workload is idle, so it is monitored. No. 6 While the given workload is idle, so it is not monitored. No. 7 While the given workload is deprecated, so it is not sandboxed. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload is containerized. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given workload is sharded. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given workload is containerized. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given workload is not containerized. No. 6 wins over No. 5. No. 2 wins over No. 1. No. 3 wins over No. 7. Question: Is the claim \"Cobalt is monitored\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032595", "pair_id": "u032595-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032595-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "93099a7a69c4df5c", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032624-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile is prepaid. Odile is registered. Odile is not oversized. Odile has a courier.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is sealed provided that it is not registered. Section 2: a parcel is fragile provided that it is not prepaid. Section 3: a parcel is undeliverable provided that it is oversized. Section 4: a parcel is hazardous provided that it has a courier. Section 5: a parcel is not sealed provided that it is oversized. Section 6: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is delayed. Section 7: a parcel is rerouted provided that it has no courier. Section 8: a parcel is damaged provided that it has a locker slot. Section 9: a parcel has a waybill provided that it is not delayed. Section 4 lapses for a parcel if it is oversized. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Which statement fits Odile?", "options": ["is undeliverable", "is sealed", "has a barcode", "is rerouted", "is damaged", "has a waybill", "is hazardous"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is hazardous", "unit_id": "u032624", "pair_id": "u032624-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032624-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fe5be8ee413639e4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a2", "a1", "a4", "a13", "a8", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032624-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile is not prepaid. Odile is registered. Odile is not oversized. Odile has a courier.", "instruction": "Section 1: a parcel is sealed provided that it is not registered. Section 2: a parcel is fragile provided that it is not prepaid. Section 3: a parcel is undeliverable provided that it is oversized. Section 4: a parcel is hazardous provided that it has a courier. Section 5: a parcel is not sealed provided that it is oversized. Section 6: a parcel has a barcode provided that it is delayed. Section 7: a parcel is rerouted provided that it has no courier. Section 8: a parcel is damaged provided that it has a locker slot. Section 9: a parcel has a waybill provided that it is not delayed. Section 4 lapses for a parcel if it is oversized. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 1. Question: Which statement fits Odile?", "options": ["is undeliverable", "is sealed", "has a barcode", "is rerouted", "is damaged", "has a waybill", "is hazardous"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is hazardous", "unit_id": "u032624", "pair_id": "u032624-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032624-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cc8f40c1a6336738", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a2", "a1", "a4", "a13", "a8", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032624-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile is prepaid. Odile is registered. Odile is not oversized. Odile has a courier.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not registered: then it is sealed. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is not prepaid: then it is fragile. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is undeliverable. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has a courier: then it is hazardous. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is not sealed. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it has a barcode. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel has no courier: then it is rerouted. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel has a locker slot: then it is damaged. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is not delayed: then it has a waybill. Policy IV is waived if that parcel is oversized. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy I. Question: Which choice is right for Odile?", "options": ["is undeliverable", "is sealed", "has a barcode", "is rerouted", "is damaged", "has a waybill", "is hazardous"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is hazardous", "unit_id": "u032624", "pair_id": "u032624-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032624-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fe5be8ee413639e4", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a2", "a1", "a4", "a13", "a8", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032624-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Odile is not prepaid. Odile is registered. Odile is not oversized. Odile has a courier.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that parcel is not registered: then it is sealed. Policy II. Suppose that parcel is not prepaid: then it is fragile. Policy III. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is undeliverable. Policy IV. Suppose that parcel has a courier: then it is hazardous. Policy V. Suppose that parcel is oversized: then it is not sealed. Policy VI. Suppose that parcel is delayed: then it has a barcode. Policy VII. Suppose that parcel has no courier: then it is rerouted. Policy VIII. Suppose that parcel has a locker slot: then it is damaged. Policy IX. Suppose that parcel is not delayed: then it has a waybill. Policy IV is waived if that parcel is oversized. In a clash, Policy V beats Policy I. Question: Which choice is right for Odile?", "options": ["is undeliverable", "is sealed", "has a barcode", "is rerouted", "is damaged", "has a waybill", "is hazardous"], "target": 6, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is hazardous", "unit_id": "u032624", "pair_id": "u032624-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032624-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "cc8f40c1a6336738", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a11", "a2", "a1", "a4", "a13", "a8", "a6"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032675-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is not foreclosed. Evren is solvent. Evren is prequalified. Evren is not underwritten. Evren has no lien. Evren has no guarantor.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is solvent and is underwritten, then it is not a depositor. (2) If a borrower has a guarantor and is prequalified and is not underwritten, then it has a cosigner. (3) If a borrower is solvent and has a lien, then it is a depositor. (4) If a borrower is foreclosed and is underwritten and is not delinquent, then it has no collateral. When (3) and (1) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Evren is a depositor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032675", "pair_id": "u032675-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/2/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032675-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1a023898253e0b65", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u032675-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is not foreclosed. Evren is solvent. Evren is prequalified. Evren is not underwritten. Evren has no lien. Evren has no guarantor.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is solvent and is underwritten, then it is not a depositor. (2) If a borrower has a guarantor and is prequalified and is underwritten, then it has a cosigner. (3) If a borrower is solvent and has a lien, then it is a depositor. (4) If a borrower is foreclosed and is underwritten and is not delinquent, then it has no collateral. When (3) and (1) clash, (3) prevails. Question: Is it true that Evren is a depositor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032675", "pair_id": "u032675-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/2/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032675-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "432eb2ea5bb71e40", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u032675-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is not foreclosed. Evren is solvent. Evren is prequalified. Evren is not underwritten. Evren has no lien. Evren has no guarantor.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is solvent, and is underwritten, that borrower is not a depositor. Item B. When the borrower has a guarantor, and is prequalified, and is not underwritten, that borrower has a cosigner. Item C. When the borrower is solvent, and has a lien, that borrower is a depositor. Item D. When the borrower is foreclosed, and is underwritten, and is not delinquent, that borrower has no collateral. Item C outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Evren is a depositor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032675", "pair_id": "u032675-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/2/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032675-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "1a023898253e0b65", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u032675-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren is not foreclosed. Evren is solvent. Evren is prequalified. Evren is not underwritten. Evren has no lien. Evren has no guarantor.", "instruction": "Item A. When the borrower is solvent, and is underwritten, that borrower is not a depositor. Item B. When the borrower has a guarantor, and is prequalified, and is underwritten, that borrower has a cosigner. Item C. When the borrower is solvent, and has a lien, that borrower is a depositor. Item D. When the borrower is foreclosed, and is underwritten, and is not delinquent, that borrower has no collateral. Item C outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Evren is a depositor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032675", "pair_id": "u032675-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/1/if/2/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032675-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "432eb2ea5bb71e40", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a5", "neg": false}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u032687-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vesper has a CPU quota of 71. Cobalt is not cached. Juno is not virtualized. Juno has a CPU quota of 4. Sierra has a replica count of 40. Sierra has a latency budget of 13. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 84. Cobalt has a latency budget of 56. Sierra is not virtualized. Sierra has a CPU quota of 98.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a replica count at or above 79, thus it is encrypted. Provision 2: when the workload here has a CPU quota beyond 71, thus it has a failover node. Provision 3: when the workload here has a firewall, thus it has a snapshot. Provision 4: when the workload here has a CPU quota at or below 71, thus it is autoscaled. Provision 5: when the workload here is virtualized, thus it has no public endpoint. Provision 6: when the workload here has a latency budget at or above 56, thus it is sharded. Provision 7: when the workload here is not virtualized, thus it is replicated. Provision 8: when the workload here has a replica count beneath 79, thus it is stateless. Provision 9: when the workload here is cached, thus it is throttled. Provision 10: when the workload here has no firewall, thus it is backed up. Question: Which one describes Cobalt?", "options": ["has a snapshot", "is autoscaled", "has a failover node", "is stateless", "is backed up", "is encrypted", "is throttled"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a failover node", "unit_id": "u032687", "pair_id": "u032687-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032687-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "eaa8217a6bc6781e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a3", "a10", "a7", "a11", "a9", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032687-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vesper has a CPU quota of 71. Cobalt is not cached. Juno is not virtualized. Juno has a CPU quota of 4. Sierra has a replica count of 40. Sierra has a latency budget of 13. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 84. Cobalt has a latency budget of 42. Sierra is not virtualized. Sierra has a CPU quota of 98.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the workload here has a replica count at or above 79, thus it is encrypted. Provision 2: when the workload here has a CPU quota beyond 71, thus it has a failover node. Provision 3: when the workload here has a firewall, thus it has a snapshot. Provision 4: when the workload here has a CPU quota at or below 71, thus it is autoscaled. Provision 5: when the workload here is virtualized, thus it has no public endpoint. Provision 6: when the workload here has a latency budget at or above 56, thus it is sharded. Provision 7: when the workload here is not virtualized, thus it is replicated. Provision 8: when the workload here has a replica count beneath 79, thus it is stateless. Provision 9: when the workload here is cached, thus it is throttled. Provision 10: when the workload here has no firewall, thus it is backed up. Question: Which one describes Cobalt?", "options": ["has a snapshot", "is autoscaled", "has a failover node", "is stateless", "is backed up", "is encrypted", "is throttled"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a failover node", "unit_id": "u032687", "pair_id": "u032687-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032687-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8ea94a70f05a5ef0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a3", "a10", "a7", "a11", "a9", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032687-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vesper has a CPU quota of 71. Cobalt is not cached. Juno is not virtualized. Juno has a CPU quota of 4. Sierra has a replica count of 40. Sierra has a latency budget of 13. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 84. Cobalt has a latency budget of 56. Sierra is not virtualized. Sierra has a CPU quota of 98.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a replica count of minimum 79, it thereby is encrypted. Point B. If said workload has a CPU quota in excess of 71, it thereby has a failover node. Point C. If said workload has a firewall, it thereby has a snapshot. Point D. If said workload has a CPU quota of maximum 71, it thereby is autoscaled. Point E. If said workload is virtualized, it thereby has no public endpoint. Point F. If said workload has a latency budget of minimum 56, it thereby is sharded. Point G. If said workload is not virtualized, it thereby is replicated. Point H. If said workload has a replica count short of 79, it thereby is stateless. Point I. If said workload is cached, it thereby is throttled. Point J. If said workload has no firewall, it thereby is backed up. Question: Which choice is true for Cobalt?", "options": ["has a snapshot", "is autoscaled", "has a failover node", "is stateless", "is backed up", "is encrypted", "is throttled"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a failover node", "unit_id": "u032687", "pair_id": "u032687-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032687-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "eaa8217a6bc6781e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a3", "a10", "a7", "a11", "a9", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032687-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Vesper has a CPU quota of 71. Cobalt is not cached. Juno is not virtualized. Juno has a CPU quota of 4. Sierra has a replica count of 40. Sierra has a latency budget of 13. Cobalt has a CPU quota of 84. Cobalt has a latency budget of 42. Sierra is not virtualized. Sierra has a CPU quota of 98.", "instruction": "Point A. If said workload has a replica count of minimum 79, it thereby is encrypted. Point B. If said workload has a CPU quota in excess of 71, it thereby has a failover node. Point C. If said workload has a firewall, it thereby has a snapshot. Point D. If said workload has a CPU quota of maximum 71, it thereby is autoscaled. Point E. If said workload is virtualized, it thereby has no public endpoint. Point F. If said workload has a latency budget of minimum 56, it thereby is sharded. Point G. If said workload is not virtualized, it thereby is replicated. Point H. If said workload has a replica count short of 79, it thereby is stateless. Point I. If said workload is cached, it thereby is throttled. Point J. If said workload has no firewall, it thereby is backed up. Question: Which choice is true for Cobalt?", "options": ["has a snapshot", "is autoscaled", "has a failover node", "is stateless", "is backed up", "is encrypted", "is throttled"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c06", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "has a failover node", "unit_id": "u032687", "pair_id": "u032687-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/7/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032687-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8ea94a70f05a5ef0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a6", "a3", "a10", "a7", "a11", "a9", "a1"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032704-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is minified. Zircon has a changelog. Zircon is fuzzed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build has no changelog, it also is not flaky. Clause 2: once any build is not minified, it also is flaky. Clause 3: once any build is flaky, it also is not notarized. Clause 4: once any build is not fuzzed, it also has no migration script. Question: Does it follow that Zircon is flaky?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032704", "pair_id": "u032704-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032704-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "dbe8a6e89d5af1bc", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032704-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Zircon is minified. Zircon has a changelog. Zircon is fuzzed.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any build has no changelog, it also is not flaky. Clause 2: once any build is not minified, it also is flaky. Clause 3: once any build is flaky, it also is not notarized. Clause 4: once any build is fuzzed, it also has no migration script. Question: Does it follow that Zircon is flaky?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032704", "pair_id": "u032704-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/3/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032704-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "69d353c01678df69", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032724-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk is prequalified. Greta has no cosigner. Greta has a lien. Corin is a depositor. Greta has an escrow account. Greta is not garnished. Greta is underwritten. Greta has collateral. Greta is not prequalified. Anouk is not garnished. Greta is employed. Greta is a depositor. Greta is vetted.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is solvent and is prequalified, then it is pensioned. (2) If a borrower has an escrow account, then it is not creditworthy. (3) If a borrower is solvent and has a lien and is not employed, then it is audited. (4) If a borrower is solvent and has no collateral and has a cosigner, then it has a guarantor. (5) If a borrower is solvent and is not a depositor, then it is foreclosed. (6) If a borrower is garnished, then it is not audited. (7) If a borrower is underwritten, then it is solvent. (8) If a borrower is solvent and has no cosigner and is employed, then it is creditworthy. (9) If a borrower is solvent and is not garnished, then it has a mortgage. (10) If a borrower is solvent and is garnished, then it is refinanced. (11) If a borrower is not vetted, then it is indebted. (8) is void if the borrower has a lien. (5) is void if the borrower is prequalified. (9) is void if the borrower is prequalified. When (8) and (2) clash, (8) prevails. When (6) and (3) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Greta?", "options": ["has a mortgage", "has a guarantor", "is audited", "is pensioned", "is foreclosed", "is creditworthy", "is refinanced"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a mortgage", "unit_id": "u032724", "pair_id": "u032724-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032724-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5f2f3bed9035cea5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a18", "a9", "a5", "a14", "a1", "a10"]}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u032724-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk is prequalified. Greta has no cosigner. Greta has a lien. Corin is a depositor. Greta has an escrow account. Greta is not garnished. Greta is underwritten. Greta has collateral. Greta is not prequalified. Anouk is not garnished. Greta is employed. Greta is a depositor. Greta is not vetted.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is solvent and is prequalified, then it is pensioned. (2) If a borrower has an escrow account, then it is not creditworthy. (3) If a borrower is solvent and has a lien and is not employed, then it is audited. (4) If a borrower is solvent and has no collateral and has a cosigner, then it has a guarantor. (5) If a borrower is solvent and is not a depositor, then it is foreclosed. (6) If a borrower is garnished, then it is not audited. (7) If a borrower is underwritten, then it is solvent. (8) If a borrower is solvent and has no cosigner and is employed, then it is creditworthy. (9) If a borrower is solvent and is not garnished, then it has a mortgage. (10) If a borrower is solvent and is garnished, then it is refinanced. (11) If a borrower is not vetted, then it is indebted. (8) is void if the borrower has a lien. (5) is void if the borrower is prequalified. (9) is void if the borrower is prequalified. When (8) and (2) clash, (8) prevails. When (6) and (3) clash, (6) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Greta?", "options": ["has a mortgage", "has a guarantor", "is audited", "is pensioned", "is foreclosed", "is creditworthy", "is refinanced"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a mortgage", "unit_id": "u032724", "pair_id": "u032724-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032724-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4f4ce4c81ab435a1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a18", "a9", "a5", "a14", "a1", "a10"]}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u032724-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk is prequalified. Greta has no cosigner. Greta has a lien. Corin is a depositor. Greta has an escrow account. Greta is not garnished. Greta is underwritten. Greta has collateral. Greta is not prequalified. Anouk is not garnished. Greta is employed. Greta is a depositor. Greta is vetted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is solvent and also is prequalified, it also is pensioned. Clause 2: once any borrower has an escrow account, it also is not creditworthy. Clause 3: once any borrower is solvent and also has a lien and also is not employed, it also is audited. Clause 4: once any borrower is solvent and also has no collateral and also has a cosigner, it also has a guarantor. Clause 5: once any borrower is solvent and also is not a depositor, it also is foreclosed. Clause 6: once any borrower is garnished, it also is not audited. Clause 7: once any borrower is underwritten, it also is solvent. Clause 8: once any borrower is solvent and also has no cosigner and also is employed, it also is creditworthy. Clause 9: once any borrower is solvent and also is not garnished, it also has a mortgage. Clause 10: once any borrower is solvent and also is garnished, it also is refinanced. Clause 11: once any borrower is not vetted, it also is indebted. Clause 8 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a lien. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is prequalified. Clause 9 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is prequalified. Clause 8 overrides Clause 2. Clause 6 overrides Clause 3. Question: Which of these is true of Greta?", "options": ["has a mortgage", "has a guarantor", "is audited", "is pensioned", "is foreclosed", "is creditworthy", "is refinanced"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a mortgage", "unit_id": "u032724", "pair_id": "u032724-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032724-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5f2f3bed9035cea5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a18", "a9", "a5", "a14", "a1", "a10"]}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u032724-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Anouk is prequalified. Greta has no cosigner. Greta has a lien. Corin is a depositor. Greta has an escrow account. Greta is not garnished. Greta is underwritten. Greta has collateral. Greta is not prequalified. Anouk is not garnished. Greta is employed. Greta is a depositor. Greta is not vetted.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower is solvent and also is prequalified, it also is pensioned. Clause 2: once any borrower has an escrow account, it also is not creditworthy. Clause 3: once any borrower is solvent and also has a lien and also is not employed, it also is audited. Clause 4: once any borrower is solvent and also has no collateral and also has a cosigner, it also has a guarantor. Clause 5: once any borrower is solvent and also is not a depositor, it also is foreclosed. Clause 6: once any borrower is garnished, it also is not audited. Clause 7: once any borrower is underwritten, it also is solvent. Clause 8: once any borrower is solvent and also has no cosigner and also is employed, it also is creditworthy. Clause 9: once any borrower is solvent and also is not garnished, it also has a mortgage. Clause 10: once any borrower is solvent and also is garnished, it also is refinanced. Clause 11: once any borrower is not vetted, it also is indebted. Clause 8 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a lien. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is prequalified. Clause 9 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is prequalified. Clause 8 overrides Clause 2. Clause 6 overrides Clause 3. Question: Which of these is true of Greta?", "options": ["has a mortgage", "has a guarantor", "is audited", "is pensioned", "is foreclosed", "is creditworthy", "is refinanced"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "has a mortgage", "unit_id": "u032724", "pair_id": "u032724-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032724-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "4f4ce4c81ab435a1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a4", "a18", "a9", "a5", "a14", "a1", "a10"]}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u032739-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma has a postdoc. Gemma is collaborative. Gemma is renewed. Gemma has industry backing. Gemma is translational. Gemma is endorsed.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a postdoc, then it has seed funding. (2) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is peer reviewed. (3) If a proposal is peer reviewed and is renewed and has seed funding, then it is embargoed. (4) If a proposal is peer reviewed and is renewed and is a pilot study, then it is not embargoed. (5) If a proposal is endorsed and is translational, then it is multicenter. (6) If a proposal has industry backing and is a pilot study and has a postdoc, then it has a field site. (7) If a proposal has a postdoc and is collaborative, then it is not multicenter. (8) If a proposal is endorsed, then it has a steering committee. (9) If a proposal is endorsed and has a postdoc, then it is exploratory. When (4) and (3) clash, (4) prevails. When (5) and (7) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Gemma is not embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032739", "pair_id": "u032739-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032739-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "efdc860315587c3a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u032739-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gemma has a postdoc. Gemma is collaborative. Gemma is renewed. Gemma has industry backing. Gemma is translational. Gemma is a pilot study. Gemma is endorsed.", "instruction": "(1) If a proposal has a postdoc, then it has seed funding. (2) If a proposal is multicenter, then it is peer reviewed. (3) If a proposal is peer reviewed and is renewed and has seed funding, then it is embargoed. (4) If a proposal is peer reviewed and is renewed and is a pilot study, then it is not embargoed. (5) If a proposal is endorsed and is translational, then it is multicenter. (6) If a proposal has industry backing and is a pilot study and has a postdoc, then it has a field site. (7) If a proposal has a postdoc and is collaborative, then it is not multicenter. (8) If a proposal is endorsed, then it has a steering committee. (9) If a proposal is endorsed and has a postdoc, then it is exploratory. When (4) and (3) clash, (4) prevails. When (5) and (7) clash, (5) prevails. Question: Is it true that Gemma is not embargoed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c17", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032739", "pair_id": "u032739-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/5", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032739-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "pri"], "theory_hash": "dd49f3f6e8ae3f61", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a12", "neg": true}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u032777-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fomalhaut has industry backing. Fomalhaut has a milestone total of 69. Fomalhaut has a review mark of 83. Fomalhaut is endorsed. Fomalhaut has a team size of 27. Fomalhaut has no field site. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 20.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is endorsed, it then is not preregistered. #2 Each time a proposal has a citation index less than 43 and additionally has a review mark of 84 or below and additionally has a team size less than 55, it then is multicenter. #3 Each time a proposal has a team size of 68 or above, it then is longitudinal. #4 Each time a proposal has a field site, it then is preregistered. #5 Each time a proposal has a citation index less than 43 and additionally has a milestone total less than 58, it then is cofunded. #6 Each time a proposal has a citation index less than 43 and additionally has a review mark greater than 84 and additionally has industry backing, it then is interdisciplinary. #7 Each time a proposal has a review mark of 27 or above, it then has ethics clearance. #4 yields to #1. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Fomalhaut?", "options": ["is interdisciplinary", "is multicenter", "is cofunded"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is multicenter", "unit_id": "u032777", "pair_id": "u032777-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032777-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5b5dcd3881a40a6f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a8", "a1"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u032777-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Fomalhaut has industry backing. Fomalhaut has a milestone total of 69. Fomalhaut has a review mark of 90. Fomalhaut is endorsed. Fomalhaut has a team size of 27. Fomalhaut has no field site. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 20.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is endorsed, it then is not preregistered. #2 Each time a proposal has a citation index less than 43 and additionally has a review mark of 84 or below and additionally has a team size less than 55, it then is multicenter. #3 Each time a proposal has a team size of 68 or above, it then is longitudinal. #4 Each time a proposal has a field site, it then is preregistered. #5 Each time a proposal has a citation index less than 43 and additionally has a milestone total less than 58, it then is cofunded. #6 Each time a proposal has a citation index less than 43 and additionally has a review mark greater than 84 and additionally has industry backing, it then is interdisciplinary. #7 Each time a proposal has a review mark of 27 or above, it then has ethics clearance. #4 yields to #1. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Fomalhaut?", "options": ["is interdisciplinary", "is multicenter", "is cofunded"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is interdisciplinary", "unit_id": "u032777", "pair_id": "u032777-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032777-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7a4fc2a4df5c9ec0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a8", "a1"]}, "attempt": 7}}
{"id": "syn-u032790-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya has a delivery window of 32. Priya is consolidated. Liesel is consolidated. Priya is not damaged. Saskia is consolidated. Priya has a parcel volume of 92. Liesel has a parcel volume of 8.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has a parcel volume of 66 or above, it then is registered. #2 Each time a parcel has a locker slot, it then is not tracked. #3 Each time a parcel is registered, it then has a locker slot. #4 Each time a parcel is registered, it then has no locker slot. #5 Each time a parcel is consolidated, it then is prepaid. #6 Each time a parcel has a delivery window of 74 or above, it then is not fragile. #3 is set aside if a parcel has a delivery window of 32 or below. #6 is set aside if a parcel has a delivery window of 38 or below. #4 is set aside if a parcel is damaged. #4 is set aside if a parcel has a delivery window greater than 32. Question: Do the terms above show that Priya has no locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032790", "pair_id": "u032790-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032790-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "802b98d1855cbbcb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u032790-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Priya has a delivery window of 97. Priya is consolidated. Liesel is consolidated. Priya is not damaged. Saskia is consolidated. Priya has a parcel volume of 92. Liesel has a parcel volume of 8.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a parcel has a parcel volume of 66 or above, it then is registered. #2 Each time a parcel has a locker slot, it then is not tracked. #3 Each time a parcel is registered, it then has a locker slot. #4 Each time a parcel is registered, it then has no locker slot. #5 Each time a parcel is consolidated, it then is prepaid. #6 Each time a parcel has a delivery window of 74 or above, it then is not fragile. #3 is set aside if a parcel has a delivery window of 32 or below. #6 is set aside if a parcel has a delivery window of 38 or below. #4 is set aside if a parcel is damaged. #4 is set aside if a parcel has a delivery window greater than 32. Question: Do the terms above show that Priya has no locker slot?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v01", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032790", "pair_id": "u032790-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032790-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "fcf3e56d86e491a0", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a5", "neg": true}, "attempt": 9}}
{"id": "syn-u032812-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda is reimbursed. Dmitri is a smoker. Dmitri is covered. Wanda has an adjuster. Wanda has no deductible waiver. Dmitri has no deductible waiver. Dmitri is a claimant. Wanda is covered. Wanda is not disputed. Dmitri is bundled. Wanda is bundled. Wanda is inspected. Dmitri is not inspected. Wanda has no rider. Dmitri has an adjuster.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is bundled and is a claimant and is litigated, then it has no dashcam. (2) If a policyholder is covered and is lapsed and is not a claimant, then it is indemnified. (3) If a policyholder is covered and is not a claimant and is not reimbursed, then it has roadside assistance. (4) If a policyholder is not a smoker, then it has a dashcam. (5) If a policyholder has a deductible waiver and is not reimbursed, then it is subrogated. (6) If a policyholder is covered and has an adjuster and is not inspected, then it is appraised. (7) If a policyholder is covered and is inspected, then it is retired. (8) If a policyholder is not reinstated and is not a smoker, then it has a premium discount. (9) If a policyholder is covered and is a claimant and has a rider, then it is grandfathered. (10) If a policyholder is not disputed, then it is not indemnified. (1) is void if the policyholder is disputed. (3) is void if the policyholder is not inspected. (6) is void if the policyholder is lapsed. When (1) and (4) clash, (1) prevails. When (2) and (10) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Wanda?", "options": ["is indemnified", "has roadside assistance", "is appraised", "is grandfathered", "is retired"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u032812", "pair_id": "u032812-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032812-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b75c1ca6a1f874b0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a17", "a1", "a20", "a6", "a12"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u032812-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda is reimbursed. Dmitri is a smoker. Dmitri is covered. Wanda has an adjuster. Wanda has no deductible waiver. Dmitri has no deductible waiver. Dmitri is a claimant. Wanda is covered. Wanda is disputed. Dmitri is bundled. Wanda is bundled. Wanda is inspected. Dmitri is not inspected. Wanda has no rider. Dmitri has an adjuster.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is bundled and is a claimant and is litigated, then it has no dashcam. (2) If a policyholder is covered and is lapsed and is not a claimant, then it is indemnified. (3) If a policyholder is covered and is not a claimant and is not reimbursed, then it has roadside assistance. (4) If a policyholder is not a smoker, then it has a dashcam. (5) If a policyholder has a deductible waiver and is not reimbursed, then it is subrogated. (6) If a policyholder is covered and has an adjuster and is not inspected, then it is appraised. (7) If a policyholder is covered and is inspected, then it is retired. (8) If a policyholder is not reinstated and is not a smoker, then it has a premium discount. (9) If a policyholder is covered and is a claimant and has a rider, then it is grandfathered. (10) If a policyholder is not disputed, then it is not indemnified. (1) is void if the policyholder is disputed. (3) is void if the policyholder is not inspected. (6) is void if the policyholder is lapsed. When (1) and (4) clash, (1) prevails. When (2) and (10) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Wanda?", "options": ["is indemnified", "has roadside assistance", "is appraised", "is grandfathered", "is retired"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u032812", "pair_id": "u032812-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032812-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "367022dfdebc910c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a17", "a1", "a20", "a6", "a12"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u032812-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda is reimbursed. Dmitri is a smoker. Dmitri is covered. Wanda has an adjuster. Wanda has no deductible waiver. Dmitri has no deductible waiver. Dmitri is a claimant. Wanda is covered. Wanda is not disputed. Dmitri is bundled. Wanda is bundled. Wanda is inspected. Dmitri is not inspected. Wanda has no rider. Dmitri has an adjuster.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is bundled and also is a claimant and also is litigated, it also has no dashcam. Clause 2: once any policyholder is covered and also is lapsed and also is not a claimant, it also is indemnified. Clause 3: once any policyholder is covered and also is not a claimant and also is not reimbursed, it also has roadside assistance. Clause 4: once any policyholder is not a smoker, it also has a dashcam. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver and also is not reimbursed, it also is subrogated. Clause 6: once any policyholder is covered and also has an adjuster and also is not inspected, it also is appraised. Clause 7: once any policyholder is covered and also is inspected, it also is retired. Clause 8: once any policyholder is not reinstated and also is not a smoker, it also has a premium discount. Clause 9: once any policyholder is covered and also is a claimant and also has a rider, it also is grandfathered. Clause 10: once any policyholder is not disputed, it also is not indemnified. Clause 1 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is disputed. Clause 3 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is not inspected. Clause 6 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is lapsed. Clause 1 overrides Clause 4. Clause 2 overrides Clause 10. Question: Which of these is true of Wanda?", "options": ["is indemnified", "has roadside assistance", "is appraised", "is grandfathered", "is retired"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u032812", "pair_id": "u032812-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032812-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b75c1ca6a1f874b0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a17", "a1", "a20", "a6", "a12"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u032812-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda is reimbursed. Dmitri is a smoker. Dmitri is covered. Wanda has an adjuster. Wanda has no deductible waiver. Dmitri has no deductible waiver. Dmitri is a claimant. Wanda is covered. Wanda is disputed. Dmitri is bundled. Wanda is bundled. Wanda is inspected. Dmitri is not inspected. Wanda has no rider. Dmitri has an adjuster.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any policyholder is bundled and also is a claimant and also is litigated, it also has no dashcam. Clause 2: once any policyholder is covered and also is lapsed and also is not a claimant, it also is indemnified. Clause 3: once any policyholder is covered and also is not a claimant and also is not reimbursed, it also has roadside assistance. Clause 4: once any policyholder is not a smoker, it also has a dashcam. Clause 5: once any policyholder has a deductible waiver and also is not reimbursed, it also is subrogated. Clause 6: once any policyholder is covered and also has an adjuster and also is not inspected, it also is appraised. Clause 7: once any policyholder is covered and also is inspected, it also is retired. Clause 8: once any policyholder is not reinstated and also is not a smoker, it also has a premium discount. Clause 9: once any policyholder is covered and also is a claimant and also has a rider, it also is grandfathered. Clause 10: once any policyholder is not disputed, it also is not indemnified. Clause 1 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is disputed. Clause 3 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is not inspected. Clause 6 does not hold for a policyholder when any policyholder is lapsed. Clause 1 overrides Clause 4. Clause 2 overrides Clause 10. Question: Which of these is true of Wanda?", "options": ["is indemnified", "has roadside assistance", "is appraised", "is grandfathered", "is retired"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u032812", "pair_id": "u032812-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032812-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "367022dfdebc910c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a17", "a1", "a20", "a6", "a12"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u032812-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda is reimbursed. Dmitri is a smoker. Dmitri is covered. Wanda has an adjuster. Wanda has no deductible waiver. Dmitri has no deductible waiver. Dmitri is a claimant. Wanda is covered. Wanda is not disputed. Dmitri is bundled. Wanda is bundled. Wanda is inspected. Dmitri is not inspected. Wanda has no rider. Dmitri has an adjuster.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is bundled, and is a claimant, and is litigated, that policyholder has no dashcam. Item B. When the policyholder is covered, and is lapsed, and is not a claimant, that policyholder is indemnified. Item C. When the policyholder is covered, and is not a claimant, and is not reimbursed, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item D. When the policyholder is not a smoker, that policyholder has a dashcam. Item E. When the policyholder has a deductible waiver, and is not reimbursed, that policyholder is subrogated. Item F. When the policyholder is covered, and has an adjuster, and is not inspected, that policyholder is appraised. Item G. When the policyholder is covered, and is inspected, that policyholder is retired. Item H. When the policyholder is not reinstated, and is not a smoker, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item I. When the policyholder is covered, and is a claimant, and has a rider, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item J. When the policyholder is not disputed, that policyholder is not indemnified. Item A is suspended when the policyholder is disputed. Item C is suspended when the policyholder is not inspected. Item F is suspended when the policyholder is lapsed. Item A outranks Item D. Item B outranks Item J. Question: What applies to Wanda?", "options": ["is indemnified", "has roadside assistance", "is appraised", "is grandfathered", "is retired"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u032812", "pair_id": "u032812-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032812-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "b75c1ca6a1f874b0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a17", "a1", "a20", "a6", "a12"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u032812-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wanda is reimbursed. Dmitri is a smoker. Dmitri is covered. Wanda has an adjuster. Wanda has no deductible waiver. Dmitri has no deductible waiver. Dmitri is a claimant. Wanda is covered. Wanda is disputed. Dmitri is bundled. Wanda is bundled. Wanda is inspected. Dmitri is not inspected. Wanda has no rider. Dmitri has an adjuster.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is bundled, and is a claimant, and is litigated, that policyholder has no dashcam. Item B. When the policyholder is covered, and is lapsed, and is not a claimant, that policyholder is indemnified. Item C. When the policyholder is covered, and is not a claimant, and is not reimbursed, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Item D. When the policyholder is not a smoker, that policyholder has a dashcam. Item E. When the policyholder has a deductible waiver, and is not reimbursed, that policyholder is subrogated. Item F. When the policyholder is covered, and has an adjuster, and is not inspected, that policyholder is appraised. Item G. When the policyholder is covered, and is inspected, that policyholder is retired. Item H. When the policyholder is not reinstated, and is not a smoker, that policyholder has a premium discount. Item I. When the policyholder is covered, and is a claimant, and has a rider, that policyholder is grandfathered. Item J. When the policyholder is not disputed, that policyholder is not indemnified. Item A is suspended when the policyholder is disputed. Item C is suspended when the policyholder is not inspected. Item F is suspended when the policyholder is lapsed. Item A outranks Item D. Item B outranks Item J. Question: What applies to Wanda?", "options": ["is indemnified", "has roadside assistance", "is appraised", "is grandfathered", "is retired"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is retired", "unit_id": "u032812", "pair_id": "u032812-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032812-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "367022dfdebc910c", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a17", "a1", "a20", "a6", "a12"]}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u032853-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny is not vetted. Dagny is not indebted. Dagny has a lien. Folke is pensioned. Folke is delinquent. Folke has a lien. Dagny is not garnished. Folke is indebted. Folke has a mortgage. Folke is garnished. Folke is vetted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is solvent while has no mortgage while is garnished, thus it is not overdrawn. Provision 2: when the borrower here is solvent while has a mortgage while is amortized, thus it is overdrawn. Provision 3: when the borrower here is delinquent, thus it is prequalified. Provision 4: when the borrower here has no lien, thus it is not prequalified. Provision 5: when the borrower here is delinquent while is garnished, thus it is solvent. Provision 6: when the borrower here is indebted while is garnished, thus it is amortized. Provision 7: when the borrower here has a lien while is delinquent, thus it is not refinanced. Provision 6 has no effect when the borrower here has no cosigner while is pensioned. Provision 7 has no effect when the borrower here is not vetted. Provision 4 has no effect when the borrower here is not delinquent. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Folke is overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032853", "pair_id": "u032853-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032853-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "68c535bda2c403a3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032853-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny is not vetted. Dagny is not indebted. Dagny has a lien. Folke is pensioned. Folke is delinquent. Folke has a lien. Dagny is not garnished. Folke is indebted. Folke has no mortgage. Folke is garnished. Folke is vetted.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here is solvent while has no mortgage while is garnished, thus it is not overdrawn. Provision 2: when the borrower here is solvent while has a mortgage while is amortized, thus it is overdrawn. Provision 3: when the borrower here is delinquent, thus it is prequalified. Provision 4: when the borrower here has no lien, thus it is not prequalified. Provision 5: when the borrower here is delinquent while is garnished, thus it is solvent. Provision 6: when the borrower here is indebted while is garnished, thus it is amortized. Provision 7: when the borrower here has a lien while is delinquent, thus it is not refinanced. Provision 6 has no effect when the borrower here has no cosigner while is pensioned. Provision 7 has no effect when the borrower here is not vetted. Provision 4 has no effect when the borrower here is not delinquent. Provision 4 has priority over Provision 3. Provision 2 has priority over Provision 1. Question: Would it be right to say that Folke is overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032853", "pair_id": "u032853-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032853-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "758760b7ba9b6592", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032853-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny is not vetted. Dagny is not indebted. Dagny has a lien. Folke is pensioned. Folke is delinquent. Folke has a lien. Dagny is not garnished. Folke is indebted. Folke has a mortgage. Folke is garnished. Folke is vetted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is solvent and further has no mortgage and further is garnished, it thereby is not overdrawn. Point B. If said borrower is solvent and further has a mortgage and further is amortized, it thereby is overdrawn. Point C. If said borrower is delinquent, it thereby is prequalified. Point D. If said borrower has no lien, it thereby is not prequalified. Point E. If said borrower is delinquent and further is garnished, it thereby is solvent. Point F. If said borrower is indebted and further is garnished, it thereby is amortized. Point G. If said borrower has a lien and further is delinquent, it thereby is not refinanced. Point F is cancelled if said borrower has no cosigner and further is pensioned. Point G is cancelled if said borrower is not vetted. Point D is cancelled if said borrower is not delinquent. Point D supersedes Point C. Point B supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Folke is overdrawn. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032853", "pair_id": "u032853-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032853-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "68c535bda2c403a3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032853-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Dagny is not vetted. Dagny is not indebted. Dagny has a lien. Folke is pensioned. Folke is delinquent. Folke has a lien. Dagny is not garnished. Folke is indebted. Folke has no mortgage. Folke is garnished. Folke is vetted.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower is solvent and further has no mortgage and further is garnished, it thereby is not overdrawn. Point B. If said borrower is solvent and further has a mortgage and further is amortized, it thereby is overdrawn. Point C. If said borrower is delinquent, it thereby is prequalified. Point D. If said borrower has no lien, it thereby is not prequalified. Point E. If said borrower is delinquent and further is garnished, it thereby is solvent. Point F. If said borrower is indebted and further is garnished, it thereby is amortized. Point G. If said borrower has a lien and further is delinquent, it thereby is not refinanced. Point F is cancelled if said borrower has no cosigner and further is pensioned. Point G is cancelled if said borrower is not vetted. Point D is cancelled if said borrower is not delinquent. Point D supersedes Point C. Point B supersedes Point A. Question: Statement: Folke is overdrawn. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032853", "pair_id": "u032853-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032853-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "758760b7ba9b6592", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032900-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar is not fuzzed. Feldspar is obsolete. Feldspar has no security advisory. Feldspar is compiled. Feldspar has a changelog.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is not reproducible provided that it is notarized as well as is not benchmarked. Section 2: a build is flaky provided that it is obsolete. Section 3: a build is reproducible provided that it is compiled. Section 4: a build is not linted provided that it is not reproducible as well as is not compiled as well as is flaky. Section 5: a build is not experimental provided that it has no changelog. Section 6: a build is linted provided that it is not reproducible as well as is compiled. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is fuzzed. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is not benchmarked as well as has a security advisory. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Feldspar is linted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032900", "pair_id": "u032900-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032900-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "5b02231b315b2a27", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u032900-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Feldspar is not fuzzed. Feldspar is obsolete. Feldspar has no security advisory. Feldspar is compiled. Feldspar has a changelog.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build is not reproducible provided that it is notarized as well as is not benchmarked. Section 2: a build is flaky provided that it is obsolete. Section 3: a build is reproducible provided that it is compiled. Section 4: a build is not linted provided that it is not reproducible as well as is not compiled as well as is flaky. Section 5: a build is not experimental provided that it has a changelog. Section 6: a build is linted provided that it is not reproducible as well as is compiled. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is fuzzed. Section 4 lapses for a build if it is not benchmarked as well as has a security advisory. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 6. Section 1 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Feldspar is linted. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c27", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032900", "pair_id": "u032900-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032900-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e93ef77cf8fa81c8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 11}}
{"id": "syn-u032927-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not garnished. Dagny has a credit rating of 53. Dagny has a risk tier of 65. Dagny is employed. Hamid is delinquent. Hamid has a credit rating of 68. Dagny has an escrow account. Dagny is indebted. Bastien is employed. Bastien has a risk tier of 33. Dagny is not delinquent. Dagny is not refinanced. Hamid has a risk tier of 53. Bastien has no escrow account. Dagny is garnished. Bastien is refinanced.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a lien and also has a risk tier of 52 or more, it also has no guarantor. Clause 2: once any borrower has a risk tier over 30 and also has a credit rating under 14, it also has no lien. Clause 3: once any borrower is garnished and also has a risk tier over 21 and also has an escrow account, it also has a lien. Clause 4: once any borrower has a lien and also has a risk tier under 81 and also has a credit rating of 49 or more, it also has a guarantor. Clause 5: once any borrower is employed and also has a credit rating over 60, it also is prequalified. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a risk tier over 59. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is delinquent and also is garnished. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is refinanced. Clause 3 overrides Clause 2. Clause 1 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Dagny has no guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032927", "pair_id": "u032927-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032927-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6714dcd8f65e13d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032927-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not garnished. Dagny has a credit rating of 53. Dagny has a risk tier of 65. Dagny is employed. Hamid is delinquent. Hamid has a credit rating of 68. Dagny has an escrow account. Dagny is indebted. Bastien is employed. Bastien has a risk tier of 33. Dagny is not delinquent. Dagny is not refinanced. Hamid has a risk tier of 53. Bastien has no escrow account. Dagny is garnished. Bastien is refinanced.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any borrower has a lien and also has a risk tier of 81 or more, it also has no guarantor. Clause 2: once any borrower has a risk tier over 30 and also has a credit rating under 14, it also has no lien. Clause 3: once any borrower is garnished and also has a risk tier over 21 and also has an escrow account, it also has a lien. Clause 4: once any borrower has a lien and also has a risk tier under 81 and also has a credit rating of 49 or more, it also has a guarantor. Clause 5: once any borrower is employed and also has a credit rating over 60, it also is prequalified. Clause 5 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower has a risk tier over 59. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is delinquent and also is garnished. Clause 1 does not hold for a borrower when any borrower is refinanced. Clause 3 overrides Clause 2. Clause 1 overrides Clause 4. Question: Does it follow that Dagny has no guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c29", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032927", "pair_id": "u032927-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "threshold_shift", "edit_path": "/rules/0/if/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032927-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "f84f0888fffb580a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032929-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is documented. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 14. Basalt has a lint backlog of 74.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is documented, so it is not compiled. No. 2 While the given build has a lint backlog that exceeds 71, so it is not merged. No. 3 While the given build has a lint backlog not below 24, so it is fuzzed. No. 4 While the given build is not merged, so it is not fuzzed. No. 5 While the given build has a lint backlog that exceeds 11, so it is merged. No. 4 wins over No. 3. No. 5 wins over No. 2. Question: Is the claim \"Basalt is merged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032929", "pair_id": "u032929-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032929-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8c4cc36f3d5271c9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032929-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is documented. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 14. Basalt has a lint backlog of 74.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build is documented, so it is not compiled. No. 2 While the given build has a lint backlog that exceeds 71, so it is not merged. No. 3 While the given build has a lint backlog not below 24, so it is fuzzed. No. 4 While the given build is not merged, so it is not fuzzed. No. 5 While the given build has a lint backlog that exceeds 11, so it is merged. No. 4 wins over No. 3. No. 2 wins over No. 5. Question: Is the claim \"Basalt is merged\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c22", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032929", "pair_id": "u032929-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "priority_swap", "edit_path": "/priorities/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032929-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "38fe38ed291ce9cf", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u032932-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is not creditworthy. Ingrid is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is prequalified provided that it is bankrupt. Section 2: a borrower has a guarantor provided that it is foreclosed. Section 3: a borrower is not refinanced provided that it is foreclosed. Section 4: a borrower is refinanced provided that it is creditworthy. Section 5: a borrower has no guarantor provided that it is not creditworthy. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Ingrid has a guarantor. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032932", "pair_id": "u032932-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032932-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8a077b89180dfd03", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032932-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is not creditworthy. Ingrid is bankrupt.", "instruction": "Section 1: a borrower is prequalified provided that it is bankrupt. Section 2: a borrower has a guarantor provided that it is foreclosed. Section 3: a borrower is not refinanced provided that it is foreclosed. Section 4: a borrower is refinanced provided that it is creditworthy. Section 5: a borrower has no guarantor provided that it is creditworthy. Section 5 takes precedence over Section 2. Section 4 takes precedence over Section 3. Question: Ingrid has a guarantor. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032932", "pair_id": "u032932-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032932-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "24305dd189729e9a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032932-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is not creditworthy. Ingrid is bankrupt.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then is prequalified. #2 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then has a guarantor. #3 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then is not refinanced. #4 Each time a borrower is creditworthy, it then is refinanced. #5 Each time a borrower is not creditworthy, it then has no guarantor. #2 yields to #5. #3 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Ingrid has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032932", "pair_id": "u032932-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032932-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "8a077b89180dfd03", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032932-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is not creditworthy. Ingrid is bankrupt.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is bankrupt, it then is prequalified. #2 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then has a guarantor. #3 Each time a borrower is foreclosed, it then is not refinanced. #4 Each time a borrower is creditworthy, it then is refinanced. #5 Each time a borrower is creditworthy, it then has no guarantor. #2 yields to #5. #3 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Ingrid has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u032932", "pair_id": "u032932-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/4/if/0/neg", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032932-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "24305dd189729e9a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032936-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is multicenter. Deneb has no postdoc. Deneb is not interdisciplinary. Deneb is theoretical. Nashira is multicenter. Nashira is theoretical. Nashira has no postdoc.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has a postdoc, it then is collaborative. #2 Each time a proposal is interdisciplinary, it then is a pilot study. #3 Each time a proposal is theoretical, it then has no ethics clearance. #4 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then has no patent filing. #5 Each time a proposal is multicenter, it then is not collaborative. #6 Each time a proposal has a steering committee, it then has a patent filing. #7 Each time a proposal has a postdoc, it then has ethics clearance. #8 Each time a proposal is multicenter, it then has a steering committee. #5 yields to #1. #3 yields to #7. #6 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Deneb has a patent filing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032936", "pair_id": "u032936-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/8", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032936-edit", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "d86f8debeb9e0dd9", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032936-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Deneb is multicenter. Deneb has no postdoc. Deneb is not interdisciplinary. Deneb is theoretical. Nashira is multicenter. Nashira is theoretical. Nashira has no postdoc.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has a postdoc, it then is collaborative. #2 Each time a proposal is interdisciplinary, it then is a pilot study. #3 Each time a proposal is theoretical, it then has no ethics clearance. #4 Each time a proposal is collaborative, it then has no patent filing. #5 Each time a proposal is multicenter, it then is not collaborative. #6 Each time a proposal has a steering committee, it then has a patent filing. #7 Each time a proposal has a postdoc, it then has ethics clearance. #8 Each time a proposal is multicenter, it then has a steering committee. #9 Each time a proposal is theoretical, it then is endorsed. #5 yields to #1. #3 yields to #7. #6 yields to #4. Question: Do the terms above show that Deneb has a patent filing?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c16", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032936", "pair_id": "u032936-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/8", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032936-orig", "rule_types": ["pri"], "theory_hash": "0060ff5da6c29bad", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032975-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Capella has a citation index of 68. Capella has a milestone total of 1. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 5. Capella has a team size of 79. Izar has a team size of 50. Izar has a milestone total of 11. Izar is not collaborative. Capella is not collaborative. Fomalhaut is collaborative. Izar has a citation index of 71.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has a postdoc provided that it is resubmitted. Section 2: a proposal is endorsed provided that it is budgeted. Section 3: a proposal is renewed provided that it has a team size of 78 or higher. Section 4: a proposal is not embargoed provided that it is collaborative. Section 5: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it has a citation index lower than 65. Section 6: a proposal is interdisciplinary provided that it has a postdoc. Section 7: a proposal is budgeted provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 8: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it has a milestone total of 43 or lower. Section 9: a proposal is not theoretical provided that it has a milestone total of 88 or lower. Section 10: a proposal is resubmitted provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 43. Section 11: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it is longitudinal. Section 12: a proposal has a steering committee provided that it has ethics clearance. Question: Which statement fits Capella?", "options": ["is endorsed", "has a steering committee", "is interdisciplinary"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a steering committee", "unit_id": "u032975", "pair_id": "u032975-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032975-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "f5a8841b6194d2d9", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a15", "a10"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u032975-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Capella has a citation index of 68. Capella has a milestone total of 1. Fomalhaut has a citation index of 5. Capella has a team size of 24. Izar has a team size of 50. Izar has a milestone total of 11. Izar is not collaborative. Capella is not collaborative. Fomalhaut is collaborative. Izar has a citation index of 71.", "instruction": "Section 1: a proposal has a postdoc provided that it is resubmitted. Section 2: a proposal is endorsed provided that it is budgeted. Section 3: a proposal is renewed provided that it has a team size of 78 or higher. Section 4: a proposal is not embargoed provided that it is collaborative. Section 5: a proposal is peer reviewed provided that it has a citation index lower than 65. Section 6: a proposal is interdisciplinary provided that it has a postdoc. Section 7: a proposal is budgeted provided that it is peer reviewed. Section 8: a proposal is longitudinal provided that it has a milestone total of 43 or lower. Section 9: a proposal is not theoretical provided that it has a milestone total of 88 or lower. Section 10: a proposal is resubmitted provided that it has a milestone total exceeding 43. Section 11: a proposal has ethics clearance provided that it is longitudinal. Section 12: a proposal has a steering committee provided that it has ethics clearance. Question: Which statement fits Capella?", "options": ["is endorsed", "has a steering committee", "is interdisciplinary"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a steering committee", "unit_id": "u032975", "pair_id": "u032975-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/3/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u032975-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "2832a3e3e12ee7c5", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a8", "a15", "a10"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u032993-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wiebke is overdrawn. Anouk is garnished. Dagny is not solvent. Wiebke is delinquent. Anouk is not foreclosed. Wiebke has no lien. Dagny is not overdrawn. Dagny is pensioned. Anouk has a lien. Dagny has a lien. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk has a cosigner. Dagny is not bankrupt. Anouk is creditworthy. Dagny is not delinquent. Wiebke is not bankrupt. Anouk is not pensioned. Anouk is solvent. Anouk is delinquent. Wiebke is foreclosed. Anouk is not overdrawn. Wiebke is not vetted. Anouk is vetted. Wiebke has a guarantor.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is creditworthy, then it is not refinanced. (2) If a borrower is amortized, then it is audited. (3) If a borrower has an escrow account, then it has a mortgage. (4) If a borrower is underwritten and is pensioned, then it is not audited. (5) If a borrower is foreclosed, then it is underwritten. (6) If a borrower is audited and is creditworthy and has a lien, then it is employed. (7) If a borrower is garnished and is creditworthy, then it is not a depositor. (8) If a borrower is audited and is solvent, then it is refinanced. (9) If a borrower is creditworthy, then it is a depositor. (10) If a borrower is overdrawn, then it is not employed. (11) If a borrower is audited, then it is indebted. (12) If a borrower is vetted and is delinquent and has a cosigner, then it is amortized. (13) If a borrower has a guarantor and is delinquent, then it is not amortized. (8) is void if the borrower is bankrupt. When (4) and (2) clash, (4) prevails. When (13) and (12) clash, (13) prevails. When (6) and (10) clash, (6) prevails. When (7) and (9) clash, (7) prevails. When (1) and (8) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Anouk?", "options": ["is employed", "is refinanced"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is employed", "unit_id": "u032993", "pair_id": "u032993-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/13/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032993-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "6a0a65a98a9bc3e1", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a10"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032993-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wiebke is overdrawn. Anouk is garnished. Dagny is not solvent. Wiebke is delinquent. Anouk is not foreclosed. Wiebke has no lien. Dagny is not overdrawn. Dagny is pensioned. Anouk has a lien. Dagny has a lien. Anouk has an escrow account. Anouk has a cosigner. Dagny is not bankrupt. Anouk is not creditworthy. Dagny is not delinquent. Wiebke is not bankrupt. Anouk is not pensioned. Anouk is solvent. Anouk is delinquent. Wiebke is foreclosed. Anouk is not overdrawn. Wiebke is not vetted. Anouk is vetted. Wiebke has a guarantor.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is creditworthy, then it is not refinanced. (2) If a borrower is amortized, then it is audited. (3) If a borrower has an escrow account, then it has a mortgage. (4) If a borrower is underwritten and is pensioned, then it is not audited. (5) If a borrower is foreclosed, then it is underwritten. (6) If a borrower is audited and is creditworthy and has a lien, then it is employed. (7) If a borrower is garnished and is creditworthy, then it is not a depositor. (8) If a borrower is audited and is solvent, then it is refinanced. (9) If a borrower is creditworthy, then it is a depositor. (10) If a borrower is overdrawn, then it is not employed. (11) If a borrower is audited, then it is indebted. (12) If a borrower is vetted and is delinquent and has a cosigner, then it is amortized. (13) If a borrower has a guarantor and is delinquent, then it is not amortized. (8) is void if the borrower is bankrupt. When (4) and (2) clash, (4) prevails. When (13) and (12) clash, (13) prevails. When (6) and (10) clash, (6) prevails. When (7) and (9) clash, (7) prevails. When (1) and (8) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Anouk?", "options": ["is employed", "is refinanced"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c25", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is refinanced", "unit_id": "u032993", "pair_id": "u032993-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/13/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032993-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ca1ec8b271d78d5e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a17", "a10"]}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u032998-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra has no snapshot. Tundra is isolated. Tundra is not deprecated. Tundra has no firewall.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is provisioned, so it is not cached. No. 2 While the given workload has a snapshot, so it has no dedicated host. No. 3 While the given workload is not isolated, so it is not replicated. No. 4 While the given workload is not cached, so it is mirrored. No. 5 While the given workload is containerized, so it has a failover node. No. 6 While the given workload is not cached, so it is not mirrored. No. 7 While the given workload has no snapshot, so it is provisioned. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given workload has a firewall. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given workload is not deprecated. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload is containerized. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload is deprecated. Question: Is the claim \"Tundra is not mirrored\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u032998", "pair_id": "u032998-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032998-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "571002ecf50033ec", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u032998-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Tundra has no snapshot. Tundra is isolated. Tundra is deprecated. Tundra has no firewall.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given workload is provisioned, so it is not cached. No. 2 While the given workload has a snapshot, so it has no dedicated host. No. 3 While the given workload is not isolated, so it is not replicated. No. 4 While the given workload is not cached, so it is mirrored. No. 5 While the given workload is containerized, so it has a failover node. No. 6 While the given workload is not cached, so it is not mirrored. No. 7 While the given workload has no snapshot, so it is provisioned. No. 5 stops applying as long as the given workload has a firewall. No. 6 stops applying as long as the given workload is not deprecated. No. 1 stops applying as long as the given workload is containerized. No. 4 stops applying as long as the given workload is deprecated. Question: Is the claim \"Tundra is not mirrored\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u032998", "pair_id": "u032998-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/2/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u032998-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "174e39bec299fcca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033017-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena is minified. Obsidian is not minified. Obsidian is signed. Obsidian has a patch cycle of 46.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a feature toggle, it thereby is reproducible. Point B. If said build has a changelog, it thereby has a migration script. Point C. If said build is reproducible, it thereby is backported. Point D. If said build is obsolete, it thereby is notarized. Point E. If said build is notarized, it thereby has a security advisory. Point F. If said build is documented, it thereby has a changelog. Point G. If said build is obsolete, it thereby has no migration script. Point H. If said build is backported, it thereby is flaky. Point I. If said build is not signed, it thereby is not profiled. Point J. If said build is benchmarked, it thereby has no migration script. Point K. If said build has a patch cycle in excess of 26, it thereby is documented. Point L. If said build is minified, it thereby is obsolete. Point G supersedes Point B. Point J supersedes Point B. Question: Which choice is true for Obsidian?", "options": ["is flaky", "has a security advisory", "has a migration script"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a migration script", "unit_id": "u033017", "pair_id": "u033017-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033017-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c5cd88bd01249f4e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u033017-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena is minified. Obsidian is not minified. Obsidian is signed. Obsidian has a patch cycle of 46.", "instruction": "Point A. If said build has a feature toggle, it thereby is reproducible. Point B. If said build has a changelog, it thereby has a migration script. Point C. If said build is reproducible, it thereby is backported. Point D. If said build is obsolete, it thereby is notarized. Point E. If said build is notarized, it thereby has a security advisory. Point F. If said build is documented, it thereby has a changelog. Point G. If said build is obsolete, it thereby has no migration script. Point H. If said build is backported, it thereby is flaky. Point I. If said build is signed, it thereby is not profiled. Point J. If said build is benchmarked, it thereby has no migration script. Point K. If said build has a patch cycle in excess of 26, it thereby is documented. Point L. If said build is minified, it thereby is obsolete. Point G supersedes Point B. Point J supersedes Point B. Question: Which choice is true for Obsidian?", "options": ["is flaky", "has a security advisory", "has a migration script"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a migration script", "unit_id": "u033017", "pair_id": "u033017-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033017-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e3e2cf8fb1187665", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u033017-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena is minified. Obsidian is not minified. Obsidian is signed. Obsidian has a patch cycle of 46.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a feature toggle, so it is reproducible. No. 2 While the given build has a changelog, so it has a migration script. No. 3 While the given build is reproducible, so it is backported. No. 4 While the given build is obsolete, so it is notarized. No. 5 While the given build is notarized, so it has a security advisory. No. 6 While the given build is documented, so it has a changelog. No. 7 While the given build is obsolete, so it has no migration script. No. 8 While the given build is backported, so it is flaky. No. 9 While the given build is not signed, so it is not profiled. No. 10 While the given build is benchmarked, so it has no migration script. No. 11 While the given build has a patch cycle that exceeds 26, so it is documented. No. 12 While the given build is minified, so it is obsolete. No. 7 wins over No. 2. No. 10 wins over No. 2. Question: Select what holds for Obsidian: which option?", "options": ["is flaky", "has a security advisory", "has a migration script"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a migration script", "unit_id": "u033017", "pair_id": "u033017-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033017-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "c5cd88bd01249f4e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u033017-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Galena is minified. Obsidian is not minified. Obsidian is signed. Obsidian has a patch cycle of 46.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given build has a feature toggle, so it is reproducible. No. 2 While the given build has a changelog, so it has a migration script. No. 3 While the given build is reproducible, so it is backported. No. 4 While the given build is obsolete, so it is notarized. No. 5 While the given build is notarized, so it has a security advisory. No. 6 While the given build is documented, so it has a changelog. No. 7 While the given build is obsolete, so it has no migration script. No. 8 While the given build is backported, so it is flaky. No. 9 While the given build is signed, so it is not profiled. No. 10 While the given build is benchmarked, so it has no migration script. No. 11 While the given build has a patch cycle that exceeds 26, so it is documented. No. 12 While the given build is minified, so it is obsolete. No. 7 wins over No. 2. No. 10 wins over No. 2. Question: Select what holds for Obsidian: which option?", "options": ["is flaky", "has a security advisory", "has a migration script"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "has a migration script", "unit_id": "u033017", "pair_id": "u033017-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/8/if/0/neg", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033017-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e3e2cf8fb1187665", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a3", "a1", "a8"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u033026-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc has a lint backlog of 75. Talc is not reproducible.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is tested: then it is experimental. Policy II. Suppose that build has a lint backlog no lower than 42: then it has no changelog. Policy III. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is not merged. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a security advisory: then it is not obsolete. Policy V. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is not fuzzed. Policy VI. Suppose that build has a lint backlog smaller than 80: then it is tested. Policy VII. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is fuzzed. Policy III is waived if that build has a lint backlog higher than 36. Policy VI is waived if that build is reproducible. Policy VII is waived if that build has a lint backlog higher than 52. Policy V is waived if that build has a lint backlog no higher than 52. Policy IV is waived if that build is reproducible. Question: Is it so that Talc is fuzzed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u033026", "pair_id": "u033026-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033026-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0f59a6195b35affd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u033026-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc has a lint backlog of 43. Talc is not reproducible.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is tested: then it is experimental. Policy II. Suppose that build has a lint backlog no lower than 42: then it has no changelog. Policy III. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is not merged. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a security advisory: then it is not obsolete. Policy V. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is not fuzzed. Policy VI. Suppose that build has a lint backlog smaller than 80: then it is tested. Policy VII. Suppose that build is experimental: then it is fuzzed. Policy III is waived if that build has a lint backlog higher than 36. Policy VI is waived if that build is reproducible. Policy VII is waived if that build has a lint backlog higher than 52. Policy V is waived if that build has a lint backlog no higher than 52. Policy IV is waived if that build is reproducible. Question: Is it so that Talc is fuzzed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u033026", "pair_id": "u033026-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033026-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "373039baee7f6dbd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u033026-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc has a lint backlog of 75. Talc is not reproducible.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is tested, it then is experimental. #2 Each time a build has a lint backlog of 42 or above, it then has no changelog. #3 Each time a build is experimental, it then is not merged. #4 Each time a build has a security advisory, it then is not obsolete. #5 Each time a build is experimental, it then is not fuzzed. #6 Each time a build has a lint backlog less than 80, it then is tested. #7 Each time a build is experimental, it then is fuzzed. #3 is set aside if a build has a lint backlog greater than 36. #6 is set aside if a build is reproducible. #7 is set aside if a build has a lint backlog greater than 52. #5 is set aside if a build has a lint backlog of 52 or below. #4 is set aside if a build is reproducible. Question: Do the terms above show that Talc is fuzzed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u033026", "pair_id": "u033026-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033026-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "0f59a6195b35affd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u033026-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc has a lint backlog of 43. Talc is not reproducible.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a build is tested, it then is experimental. #2 Each time a build has a lint backlog of 42 or above, it then has no changelog. #3 Each time a build is experimental, it then is not merged. #4 Each time a build has a security advisory, it then is not obsolete. #5 Each time a build is experimental, it then is not fuzzed. #6 Each time a build has a lint backlog less than 80, it then is tested. #7 Each time a build is experimental, it then is fuzzed. #3 is set aside if a build has a lint backlog greater than 36. #6 is set aside if a build is reproducible. #7 is set aside if a build has a lint backlog greater than 52. #5 is set aside if a build has a lint backlog of 52 or below. #4 is set aside if a build is reproducible. Question: Do the terms above show that Talc is fuzzed?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u033026", "pair_id": "u033026-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033026-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "373039baee7f6dbd", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 8}}
{"id": "syn-u033051-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel has a caregiver. Wendel is referred. Wendel is hypertensive. Florin is symptomatic. Florin is not referred. Florin has no chaperone. Florin is not hypertensive. Florin has an interpreter. Florin is not diabetic. Florin has a caregiver.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is referred, thus it is asthmatic. Provision 2: when the patient here is diabetic, thus it is not rescheduled. Provision 3: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it is fasting. Provision 4: when the patient here is asthmatic, thus it is triaged. Provision 5: when the patient here has an interpreter, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 6: when the patient here has a caregiver, thus it is anemic. Provision 7: when the patient here is anemic, thus it is postoperative. Provision 8: when the patient here is waitlisted, thus it is allergic. Provision 9: when the patient here has a chaperone, thus it is ambulatory. Provision 10: when the patient here is ambulatory, thus it is bedridden. Provision 11: when the patient here is hypertensive, thus it has a pacemaker. Provision 12: when the patient here is ambulatory, thus it is not fasting. Provision 8 has no effect when the patient here has a caregiver. Provision 8 has no effect when the patient here is referred. Provision 12 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Which one describes Florin?", "options": ["is postoperative", "is allergic", "is bedridden", "is fasting", "is triaged"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is postoperative", "unit_id": "u033051", "pair_id": "u033051-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033051-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a76d5ee9f3d883e8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a0", "a6", "a10", "a3"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u033051-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel has a caregiver. Wendel is referred. Wendel is hypertensive. Florin is symptomatic. Florin is not referred. Florin has no chaperone. Florin is not hypertensive. Florin has an interpreter. Florin is not diabetic. Florin has no caregiver.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the patient here is referred, thus it is asthmatic. Provision 2: when the patient here is diabetic, thus it is not rescheduled. Provision 3: when the patient here has a pacemaker, thus it is fasting. Provision 4: when the patient here is asthmatic, thus it is triaged. Provision 5: when the patient here has an interpreter, thus it is waitlisted. Provision 6: when the patient here has a caregiver, thus it is anemic. Provision 7: when the patient here is anemic, thus it is postoperative. Provision 8: when the patient here is waitlisted, thus it is allergic. Provision 9: when the patient here has a chaperone, thus it is ambulatory. Provision 10: when the patient here is ambulatory, thus it is bedridden. Provision 11: when the patient here is hypertensive, thus it has a pacemaker. Provision 12: when the patient here is ambulatory, thus it is not fasting. Provision 8 has no effect when the patient here has a caregiver. Provision 8 has no effect when the patient here is referred. Provision 12 has priority over Provision 3. Question: Which one describes Florin?", "options": ["is postoperative", "is allergic", "is bedridden", "is fasting", "is triaged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is allergic", "unit_id": "u033051", "pair_id": "u033051-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033051-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "794333d70c1b58ae", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a0", "a6", "a10", "a3"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u033051-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel has a caregiver. Wendel is referred. Wendel is hypertensive. Florin is symptomatic. Florin is not referred. Florin has no chaperone. Florin is not hypertensive. Florin has an interpreter. Florin is not diabetic. Florin has a caregiver.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is referred, so it is asthmatic. No. 2 While the given patient is diabetic, so it is not rescheduled. No. 3 While the given patient has a pacemaker, so it is fasting. No. 4 While the given patient is asthmatic, so it is triaged. No. 5 While the given patient has an interpreter, so it is waitlisted. No. 6 While the given patient has a caregiver, so it is anemic. No. 7 While the given patient is anemic, so it is postoperative. No. 8 While the given patient is waitlisted, so it is allergic. No. 9 While the given patient has a chaperone, so it is ambulatory. No. 10 While the given patient is ambulatory, so it is bedridden. No. 11 While the given patient is hypertensive, so it has a pacemaker. No. 12 While the given patient is ambulatory, so it is not fasting. No. 8 stops applying as long as the given patient has a caregiver. No. 8 stops applying as long as the given patient is referred. No. 12 wins over No. 3. Question: Select what holds for Florin: which option?", "options": ["is postoperative", "is allergic", "is bedridden", "is fasting", "is triaged"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is postoperative", "unit_id": "u033051", "pair_id": "u033051-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033051-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a76d5ee9f3d883e8", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a0", "a6", "a10", "a3"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u033051-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Wendel has a caregiver. Wendel is referred. Wendel is hypertensive. Florin is symptomatic. Florin is not referred. Florin has no chaperone. Florin is not hypertensive. Florin has an interpreter. Florin is not diabetic. Florin has no caregiver.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given patient is referred, so it is asthmatic. No. 2 While the given patient is diabetic, so it is not rescheduled. No. 3 While the given patient has a pacemaker, so it is fasting. No. 4 While the given patient is asthmatic, so it is triaged. No. 5 While the given patient has an interpreter, so it is waitlisted. No. 6 While the given patient has a caregiver, so it is anemic. No. 7 While the given patient is anemic, so it is postoperative. No. 8 While the given patient is waitlisted, so it is allergic. No. 9 While the given patient has a chaperone, so it is ambulatory. No. 10 While the given patient is ambulatory, so it is bedridden. No. 11 While the given patient is hypertensive, so it has a pacemaker. No. 12 While the given patient is ambulatory, so it is not fasting. No. 8 stops applying as long as the given patient has a caregiver. No. 8 stops applying as long as the given patient is referred. No. 12 wins over No. 3. Question: Select what holds for Florin: which option?", "options": ["is postoperative", "is allergic", "is bedridden", "is fasting", "is triaged"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v03", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is allergic", "unit_id": "u033051", "pair_id": "u033051-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/9/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033051-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "794333d70c1b58ae", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a0", "a6", "a10", "a3"]}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u033059-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Agata has no premium discount. Xaver is not a claimant. Xaver is bundled. Zdenek is not retired. Agata has roadside assistance. Zdenek is not a claimant. Xaver has no premium discount. Xaver is lapsed. Agata is not reinstated. Xaver is not retired. Xaver has no roadside assistance. Xaver is not reinstated. Xaver is inspected. Zdenek has no premium discount.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is inspected, then it is not appraised. (2) If a policyholder has a premium discount, then it is litigated. (3) If a policyholder is retired, then it has a dashcam. (4) If a policyholder is reinstated, then it is appraised. (5) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it is subrogated. (6) If a policyholder is retired, then it is not appraised. (7) If a policyholder is a claimant, then it is not a smoker. (8) If a policyholder is indemnified, then it is a smoker. (9) If a policyholder is bundled, then it is grandfathered. (10) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it is not grandfathered. (11) If a policyholder is lapsed, then it is covered. (12) If a policyholder is grandfathered, then it has no rider. (13) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it is not grandfathered. (14) If a policyholder has roadside assistance, then it is reimbursed. (2) is void if the policyholder is indemnified. When (7) and (8) clash, (7) prevails. When (1) and (4) clash, (1) prevails. When (6) and (4) clash, (6) prevails. When (10) and (9) clash, (10) prevails. When (9) and (13) clash, (9) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Xaver?", "options": ["is reimbursed", "is a smoker", "is subrogated", "is litigated", "has a dashcam", "is grandfathered", "is appraised"], "target": 5, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is grandfathered", "unit_id": "u033059", "pair_id": "u033059-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033059-edit", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "53f5ae06d4e70c0e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a5", "a9", "a0", "a7", "a10", "a4", "a16"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u033059-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Agata has no premium discount. Xaver has a beneficiary. Xaver is not a claimant. Xaver is bundled. Zdenek is not retired. Agata has roadside assistance. Zdenek is not a claimant. Xaver has no premium discount. Xaver is lapsed. Agata is not reinstated. Xaver is not retired. Xaver has no roadside assistance. Xaver is not reinstated. Xaver is inspected. Zdenek has no premium discount.", "instruction": "(1) If a policyholder is inspected, then it is not appraised. (2) If a policyholder has a premium discount, then it is litigated. (3) If a policyholder is retired, then it has a dashcam. (4) If a policyholder is reinstated, then it is appraised. (5) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it is subrogated. (6) If a policyholder is retired, then it is not appraised. (7) If a policyholder is a claimant, then it is not a smoker. (8) If a policyholder is indemnified, then it is a smoker. (9) If a policyholder is bundled, then it is grandfathered. (10) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it is not grandfathered. (11) If a policyholder is lapsed, then it is covered. (12) If a policyholder is grandfathered, then it has no rider. (13) If a policyholder has a beneficiary, then it is not grandfathered. (14) If a policyholder has roadside assistance, then it is reimbursed. (2) is void if the policyholder is indemnified. When (7) and (8) clash, (7) prevails. When (1) and (4) clash, (1) prevails. When (6) and (4) clash, (6) prevails. When (10) and (9) clash, (10) prevails. When (9) and (13) clash, (9) prevails. Question: Which option holds for Xaver?", "options": ["is reimbursed", "is a smoker", "is subrogated", "is litigated", "has a dashcam", "is grandfathered", "is appraised"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c24", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is subrogated", "unit_id": "u033059", "pair_id": "u033059-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033059-orig", "rule_types": ["exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "7adba83785213e5a", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e2", "candidates": ["a5", "a9", "a0", "a7", "a10", "a4", "a16"]}, "attempt": 3}}
{"id": "syn-u033062-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte has a commute radius of 78. Rune has a visa. Rune is not a veteran. Sigrid is not bonded. Sigrid is certified. Rune is not unionized. Hedda has no visa. Hedda is certified. Lotte is unionized. Lotte is certified. Lotte is bonded. Lotte has a notice period of 4. Lotte has a visa. Lotte is not a veteran. Rune is bilingual. Rune has a commute radius of 43.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus has a notice period smaller than 32 plus is certified: then it is not fingerprinted. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus has a notice period no lower than 32 plus is certified: then it is fingerprinted. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is not bonded plus is certified plus is a veteran: then it is a graduate. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus has no visa: then it has no diploma. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is unionized: then it has a background screening. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate has a commute radius no lower than 64: then it is relocating. Policy VI is waived if that candidate is not certified. Policy V is waived if that candidate is not a veteran plus is bilingual. Policy IV is waived if that candidate is unionized. Policy I is waived if that candidate is a veteran. Question: Is it so that Lotte is fingerprinted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u033062", "pair_id": "u033062-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/15", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033062-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "2eebd5696c710d28", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u033062-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Lotte has a commute radius of 78. Rune has a visa. Rune is not a veteran. Sigrid is not bonded. Sigrid is certified. Rune is not unionized. Hedda has no visa. Hedda is certified. Lotte is unionized. Lotte is certified. Lotte is bonded. Lotte has a notice period of 4. Lotte has a visa. Lotte is not a veteran. Rune is bilingual. Lotte is bilingual. Rune has a commute radius of 43.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus has a notice period smaller than 32 plus is certified: then it is not fingerprinted. Policy II. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus has a notice period no lower than 32 plus is certified: then it is fingerprinted. Policy III. Suppose that candidate is not bonded plus is certified plus is a veteran: then it is a graduate. Policy IV. Suppose that candidate has a background screening plus has no visa: then it has no diploma. Policy V. Suppose that candidate is unionized: then it has a background screening. Policy VI. Suppose that candidate has a commute radius no lower than 64: then it is relocating. Policy VI is waived if that candidate is not certified. Policy V is waived if that candidate is not a veteran plus is bilingual. Policy IV is waived if that candidate is unionized. Policy I is waived if that candidate is a veteran. Question: Is it so that Lotte is fingerprinted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c15", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u033062", "pair_id": "u033062-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/15", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033062-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "e02e8747437e76f4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a6", "neg": false}, "attempt": 13}}
{"id": "syn-u033066-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra is not eligible. Petra has no diploma. Ivo is bilingual. Ivo is not bonded. Ivo is not licensed. Petra is headhunted. Petra is fingerprinted. Ivo is interviewed. Petra is not interviewed. Petra is relocating. Petra is licensed. Petra has no visa. Ivo is not fingerprinted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is not eligible, it then is recommended. #2 Each time a candidate is not headhunted, it then is not sponsored. #3 Each time a candidate is recommended and additionally is interviewed, it then is freelance. #4 Each time a candidate is not bonded, it then is not probationary. #5 Each time a candidate is recommended and additionally is bilingual, it then is probationary. #6 Each time a candidate is recommended and additionally is not relocating, it then is seasoned. #7 Each time a candidate is recommended and additionally is not licensed, it then has a signing bonus. #8 Each time a candidate is recommended and additionally is not bonded, it then has a background screening. #9 Each time a candidate is not bonded, it then is not seasoned. #10 Each time a candidate is recommended and additionally has a visa and additionally is unionized, it then is sponsored. #11 Each time a candidate is not relocating, it then has no signing bonus. #12 Each time a candidate is not fingerprinted and additionally has a diploma, it then has a mentor. #13 Each time a candidate is recommended and additionally is not interviewed, it then is onboarded. #5 yields to #4. #7 yields to #11. #6 yields to #9. #10 yields to #2. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Petra?", "options": ["has a background screening", "is seasoned", "is freelance", "is probationary", "is onboarded", "is sponsored", "has a signing bonus"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is onboarded", "unit_id": "u033066", "pair_id": "u033066-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033066-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "483bbcc11025dd66", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a15", "a0", "a10", "a3", "a2", "a6"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u033066-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Petra is not eligible. Petra has no diploma. Ivo is bilingual. Ivo is not bonded. Ivo is not licensed. Petra is not headhunted. Petra is fingerprinted. Ivo is interviewed. Petra is not interviewed. Petra is relocating. Petra is licensed. Petra has no visa. Ivo is not fingerprinted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a candidate is not eligible, it then is recommended. #2 Each time a candidate is not headhunted, it then is not sponsored. #3 Each time a candidate is recommended and additionally is interviewed, it then is freelance. #4 Each time a candidate is not bonded, it then is not probationary. #5 Each time a candidate is recommended and additionally is bilingual, it then is probationary. #6 Each time a candidate is recommended and additionally is not relocating, it then is seasoned. #7 Each time a candidate is recommended and additionally is not licensed, it then has a signing bonus. #8 Each time a candidate is recommended and additionally is not bonded, it then has a background screening. #9 Each time a candidate is not bonded, it then is not seasoned. #10 Each time a candidate is recommended and additionally has a visa and additionally is unionized, it then is sponsored. #11 Each time a candidate is not relocating, it then has no signing bonus. #12 Each time a candidate is not fingerprinted and additionally has a diploma, it then has a mentor. #13 Each time a candidate is recommended and additionally is not interviewed, it then is onboarded. #5 yields to #4. #7 yields to #11. #6 yields to #9. #10 yields to #2. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Petra?", "options": ["has a background screening", "is seasoned", "is freelance", "is probationary", "is onboarded", "is sponsored", "has a signing bonus"], "target": 4, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c19", "vocabulary_id": "v06", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is onboarded", "unit_id": "u033066", "pair_id": "u033066-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/5/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033066-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bba4bd70c8c2bf31", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e1", "candidates": ["a9", "a15", "a0", "a10", "a3", "a2", "a6"]}, "attempt": 6}}
{"id": "syn-u033071-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery has no failover node. Borealis is sharded. Orrery is encrypted. Orrery is virtualized. Orrery is not sharded. Zephyr is sharded. Zephyr has no failover node.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is patched plus is encrypted: then it is throttled. Policy II. Suppose that workload is virtualized plus is sharded: then it is patched. Policy III. Suppose that workload is virtualized plus is not sharded plus is encrypted: then it is not patched. Policy IV. Suppose that workload has no failover node plus is virtualized: then it is sandboxed. Question: Is it so that Orrery is not patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u033071", "pair_id": "u033071-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033071-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "eca20a7cfc512ca6", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033071-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Orrery has a failover node. Borealis is sharded. Orrery is encrypted. Orrery is virtualized. Orrery is not sharded. Zephyr is sharded. Zephyr has no failover node.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is patched plus is encrypted: then it is throttled. Policy II. Suppose that workload is virtualized plus is sharded: then it is patched. Policy III. Suppose that workload is virtualized plus is not sharded plus is encrypted: then it is not patched. Policy IV. Suppose that workload has no failover node plus is virtualized: then it is sandboxed. Question: Is it so that Orrery is not patched?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c03", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u033071", "pair_id": "u033071-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/0/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033071-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg"], "theory_hash": "d0daf5d4e4a1d89e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e3", "attr": "a0", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033079-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is not overdrawn. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 53.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is garnished, then it is underwritten. (2) If a borrower has a debt ratio below 26, then it is not underwritten. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Ingrid is not overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u033079", "pair_id": "u033079-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033079-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "bc4ed2b5fd4ab461", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033079-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Ingrid is garnished. Ingrid is not overdrawn. Ingrid has a debt ratio of 53.", "instruction": "(1) If a borrower is garnished, then it is underwritten. (2) If a borrower has a debt ratio below 26, then it is not underwritten. When (1) and (2) clash, (1) prevails. Question: Is it true that Ingrid is not overdrawn?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u033079", "pair_id": "u033079-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033079-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "210e6901b66786d2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033082-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has a replica count of 60. Halcyon is not isolated. Orrery has a latency budget of 45. Halcyon has a replica count of 12. Orrery is not isolated. Halcyon has a GPU. Borealis has a latency budget of 37. Halcyon has a latency budget of 10. Quasar has a replica count of 44. Quasar has a latency budget of 86. Borealis has a replica count of 54. Orrery has a GPU.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is sandboxed provided that it has a replica count of 44 or lower. Section 2: a workload is throttled provided that it has a latency budget of 24 or lower. Section 3: a workload is not provisioned provided that it is isolated. Section 4: a workload has no firewall provided that it has a latency budget of 40 or higher. Section 5: a workload is monitored provided that it has a latency budget exceeding 24. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it has a latency budget of 36 or higher. Section 3 lapses for a workload if it has a latency budget of 54 or higher. Section 4 lapses for a workload if it has a GPU. Question: Which statement fits Borealis?", "options": ["is sandboxed", "is monitored", "is throttled"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is monitored", "unit_id": "u033082", "pair_id": "u033082-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033082-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3529954e5207268e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a6", "a7"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u033082-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has a replica count of 60. Halcyon is not isolated. Orrery has a latency budget of 45. Halcyon has a replica count of 12. Orrery is not isolated. Halcyon has a GPU. Borealis has a latency budget of 59. Halcyon has a latency budget of 10. Quasar has a replica count of 44. Quasar has a latency budget of 86. Borealis has a replica count of 54. Orrery has a GPU.", "instruction": "Section 1: a workload is sandboxed provided that it has a replica count of 44 or lower. Section 2: a workload is throttled provided that it has a latency budget of 24 or lower. Section 3: a workload is not provisioned provided that it is isolated. Section 4: a workload has no firewall provided that it has a latency budget of 40 or higher. Section 5: a workload is monitored provided that it has a latency budget exceeding 24. Section 1 lapses for a workload if it has a latency budget of 36 or higher. Section 3 lapses for a workload if it has a latency budget of 54 or higher. Section 4 lapses for a workload if it has a GPU. Question: Which statement fits Borealis?", "options": ["is sandboxed", "is monitored", "is throttled"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is monitored", "unit_id": "u033082", "pair_id": "u033082-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033082-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "15819a33e303ecca", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a6", "a7"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u033082-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has a replica count of 60. Halcyon is not isolated. Orrery has a latency budget of 45. Halcyon has a replica count of 12. Orrery is not isolated. Halcyon has a GPU. Borealis has a latency budget of 37. Halcyon has a latency budget of 10. Quasar has a replica count of 44. Quasar has a latency budget of 86. Borealis has a replica count of 54. Orrery has a GPU.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload has a replica count no higher than 44: then it is sandboxed. Policy II. Suppose that workload has a latency budget no higher than 24: then it is throttled. Policy III. Suppose that workload is isolated: then it is not provisioned. Policy IV. Suppose that workload has a latency budget no lower than 40: then it has no firewall. Policy V. Suppose that workload has a latency budget higher than 24: then it is monitored. Policy I is waived if that workload has a latency budget no lower than 36. Policy III is waived if that workload has a latency budget no lower than 54. Policy IV is waived if that workload has a GPU. Question: Which choice is right for Borealis?", "options": ["is sandboxed", "is monitored", "is throttled"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is monitored", "unit_id": "u033082", "pair_id": "u033082-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033082-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "3529954e5207268e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a6", "a7"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u033082-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Orrery has a replica count of 60. Halcyon is not isolated. Orrery has a latency budget of 45. Halcyon has a replica count of 12. Orrery is not isolated. Halcyon has a GPU. Borealis has a latency budget of 59. Halcyon has a latency budget of 10. Quasar has a replica count of 44. Quasar has a latency budget of 86. Borealis has a replica count of 54. Orrery has a GPU.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload has a replica count no higher than 44: then it is sandboxed. Policy II. Suppose that workload has a latency budget no higher than 24: then it is throttled. Policy III. Suppose that workload is isolated: then it is not provisioned. Policy IV. Suppose that workload has a latency budget no lower than 40: then it has no firewall. Policy V. Suppose that workload has a latency budget higher than 24: then it is monitored. Policy I is waived if that workload has a latency budget no lower than 36. Policy III is waived if that workload has a latency budget no lower than 54. Policy IV is waived if that workload has a GPU. Question: Which choice is right for Borealis?", "options": ["is sandboxed", "is monitored", "is throttled"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c12", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "is monitored", "unit_id": "u033082", "pair_id": "u033082-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033082-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "exc"], "theory_hash": "15819a33e303ecca", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a2", "a6", "a7"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u033085-t03-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is not linted. Mica is not obsolete. Obsidian is not minified.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build has a changelog provided that it is linted as well as is minified. Section 2: a build is benchmarked provided that it is minified as well as is obsolete as well as has a feature toggle. Section 2 lapses for a build if it has a feature toggle. Question: Obsidian is obsolete. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u033085", "pair_id": "u033085-t03", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033085-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "45ed671083a43616", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033085-t03-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Mica is not linted. Mica is not obsolete. Obsidian is not minified. Obsidian is obsolete.", "instruction": "Section 1: a build has a changelog provided that it is linted as well as is minified. Section 2: a build is benchmarked provided that it is minified as well as is obsolete as well as has a feature toggle. Section 2 lapses for a build if it has a feature toggle. Question: Obsidian is obsolete. Correct, wrong, or open?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t03", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c09", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u033085", "pair_id": "u033085-t03", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033085-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "exc"], "theory_hash": "d2af38f19f912af3", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e1", "attr": "a4", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033106-t00-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar is not cached. Orrery has no dedicated host. Quasar has no dedicated host. Quasar is not sandboxed. Zephyr is sandboxed. Orrery has a memory allotment of 33. Quasar has a memory allotment of 16.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is sandboxed, then it is encrypted. (2) If a workload has a dedicated host, then it is not encrypted. (3) If a workload has a memory allotment below 80, then it is monitored. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Quasar is encrypted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u033106", "pair_id": "u033106-t00", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033106-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e84c8a1619d85816", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u033106-t00-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar is not cached. Orrery has no dedicated host. Quasar has no dedicated host. Quasar is not sandboxed. Zephyr is sandboxed. Orrery has a memory allotment of 33. Quasar has a memory allotment of 16.", "instruction": "(1) If a workload is sandboxed, then it is encrypted. (2) If a workload has a dedicated host, then it is not encrypted. (3) If a workload has a memory allotment of at least 80, then it is monitored. When (2) and (1) clash, (2) prevails. Question: Is it true that Quasar is encrypted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t00", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u033106", "pair_id": "u033106-t00", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033106-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2785dfa33501b3b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u033106-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar is not cached. Orrery has no dedicated host. Quasar has no dedicated host. Quasar is not sandboxed. Zephyr is sandboxed. Orrery has a memory allotment of 33. Quasar has a memory allotment of 16.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is sandboxed, that workload is encrypted. Item B. When the workload has a dedicated host, that workload is not encrypted. Item C. When the workload has a memory allotment of less than 80, that workload is monitored. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Quasar is encrypted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u033106", "pair_id": "u033106-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033106-edit", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "e84c8a1619d85816", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u033106-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Quasar is not cached. Orrery has no dedicated host. Quasar has no dedicated host. Quasar is not sandboxed. Zephyr is sandboxed. Orrery has a memory allotment of 33. Quasar has a memory allotment of 16.", "instruction": "Item A. When the workload is sandboxed, that workload is encrypted. Item B. When the workload has a dedicated host, that workload is not encrypted. Item C. When the workload has a memory allotment of no less than 80, that workload is monitored. Item B outranks Item A. Question: Can one infer that Quasar is encrypted?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c20", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u033106", "pair_id": "u033106-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "condition_negate", "edit_path": "/rules/2/if/0/op", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033106-orig", "rule_types": ["thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "2785dfa33501b3b2", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u033150-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is profiled. Mica is not compiled. Obsidian is not compiled. Schist is reproducible. Talc is not signed. Schist has a security advisory. Obsidian has a migration script. Obsidian is not obsolete. Mica is not backported. Obsidian is reproducible. Schist has a migration script. Mica has a feature toggle. Mica is not signed. Schist has a feature toggle. Schist is not obsolete. Schist is not compiled. Schist is backported. Obsidian has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is flaky. Policy II. Suppose that build is documented plus is backported plus is reproducible: then it is tested. Policy III. Suppose that build is documented plus is obsolete plus is signed: then it is not tested. Policy IV. Suppose that build has a migration script plus has a feature toggle plus has a security advisory: then it is reverted. Policy V. Suppose that build is profiled plus is compiled: then it is versioned. Question: Is it so that Schist is not tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u033150", "pair_id": "u033150-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033150-edit", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "7efd8868d5fb0ab4", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033150-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Talc is profiled. Mica is not compiled. Obsidian is not compiled. Schist is reproducible. Talc is not signed. Schist has a security advisory. Obsidian has a migration script. Obsidian is not obsolete. Mica is not backported. Obsidian is reproducible. Schist has a migration script. Mica has a feature toggle. Mica is not signed. Schist has a feature toggle. Schist is not obsolete. Schist is not compiled. Schist is backported. Obsidian has no feature toggle.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that build is reverted: then it is flaky. Policy II. Suppose that build is documented plus is backported plus is reproducible: then it is tested. Policy III. Suppose that build is documented plus is obsolete plus is signed: then it is not tested. Policy IV. Suppose that build is reverted plus has a migration script plus has a feature toggle: then it is documented. Policy V. Suppose that build has a migration script plus has a feature toggle plus has a security advisory: then it is reverted. Policy VI. Suppose that build is profiled plus is compiled: then it is versioned. Question: Is it so that Schist is not tested?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c01", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u033150", "pair_id": "u033150-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/3", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033150-orig", "rule_types": ["conj"], "theory_hash": "f5acba25c1b8a729", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a3", "neg": true}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033151-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver has a peril factor of 17. Zdenek is indemnified. Zdenek is bundled. Zdenek has a payout ceiling of 29. Yara is not bundled. Celeste has a peril factor of 34. Yara has a peril factor of 40. Celeste is not retired. Xaver is not retired. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 29. Yara is indemnified. Xaver is bundled. Zdenek has a peril factor of 20. Xaver is not a smoker. Zdenek is retired. Zdenek is not a smoker.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is not subrogated, and is not a smoker, and has a payout ceiling of less than 38, that policyholder has no roadside assistance. Item B. When the policyholder is retired, that policyholder is covered. Item C. When the policyholder is bundled, and has a peril factor of less than 73, and has a payout ceiling of no more than 51, that policyholder is not subrogated. Item D. When the policyholder is not subrogated, and is a smoker, and is indemnified, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Question: Can one infer that Zdenek has roadside assistance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u033151", "pair_id": "u033151-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033151-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "f38d08eb6fe60519", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u033151-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Xaver has a peril factor of 17. Zdenek is indemnified. Zdenek is bundled. Zdenek has a payout ceiling of 29. Yara is not bundled. Celeste has a peril factor of 34. Yara has a peril factor of 40. Celeste is not retired. Xaver is not retired. Celeste has a payout ceiling of 29. Yara is indemnified. Xaver is bundled. Zdenek has a peril factor of 20. Xaver is not a smoker. Zdenek is retired. Zdenek is a smoker.", "instruction": "Item A. When the policyholder is not subrogated, and is not a smoker, and has a payout ceiling of less than 38, that policyholder has no roadside assistance. Item B. When the policyholder is retired, that policyholder is covered. Item C. When the policyholder is bundled, and has a peril factor of less than 73, and has a payout ceiling of no more than 51, that policyholder is not subrogated. Item D. When the policyholder is not subrogated, and is a smoker, and is indemnified, that policyholder has roadside assistance. Question: Can one infer that Zdenek has roadside assistance?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v07", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u033151", "pair_id": "u033151-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/15/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033151-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "d33144376aa562ca", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e2", "attr": "a8", "neg": false}, "attempt": 5}}
{"id": "syn-u033152-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar has no field site. Betelgeuse has a postdoc. Betelgeuse is multicenter. Deneb is not shortlisted. Deneb has no seed funding. Mirach is not shortlisted. Mirach is multicenter. Betelgeuse is not shortlisted. Deneb has no field site. Deneb has a postdoc. Izar has a postdoc. Mirach has no field site. Deneb is not multicenter. Betelgeuse has seed funding. Betelgeuse has a field site.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has no field site, it then is budgeted. #2 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then is theoretical. #3 Each time a proposal is multicenter, it then is a pilot study. #4 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then has no ethics clearance. #5 Each time a proposal is resubmitted, it then has a patent filing. #6 Each time a proposal is not multicenter, it then is resubmitted. #7 Each time a proposal has no seed funding, it then has a steering committee. #8 Each time a proposal has no ethics clearance, it then is longitudinal. #9 Each time a proposal has a field site, it then has no industry backing. #10 Each time a proposal is shortlisted, it then is renewed. #11 Each time a proposal has a patent filing, it then is embargoed. #12 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is peer reviewed. #8 is set aside if a proposal has no postdoc. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Deneb?", "options": ["is theoretical", "is longitudinal", "is embargoed"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is embargoed", "unit_id": "u033152", "pair_id": "u033152-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033152-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "673ceadff637d60f", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a16", "a9", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u033152-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Izar has no field site. Betelgeuse has a postdoc. Betelgeuse is multicenter. Deneb is not shortlisted. Deneb has no seed funding. Mirach is not shortlisted. Mirach is multicenter. Betelgeuse is not shortlisted. Deneb has no field site. Deneb has a postdoc. Izar has a postdoc. Mirach has no field site. Deneb is multicenter. Betelgeuse has seed funding. Betelgeuse has a field site.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal has no field site, it then is budgeted. #2 Each time a proposal is peer reviewed, it then is theoretical. #3 Each time a proposal is multicenter, it then is a pilot study. #4 Each time a proposal is a pilot study, it then has no ethics clearance. #5 Each time a proposal is resubmitted, it then has a patent filing. #6 Each time a proposal is not multicenter, it then is resubmitted. #7 Each time a proposal has no seed funding, it then has a steering committee. #8 Each time a proposal has no ethics clearance, it then is longitudinal. #9 Each time a proposal has a field site, it then has no industry backing. #10 Each time a proposal is shortlisted, it then is renewed. #11 Each time a proposal has a patent filing, it then is embargoed. #12 Each time a proposal is renewed, it then is peer reviewed. #8 is set aside if a proposal has no postdoc. Question: Which of the listed options is correct for Deneb?", "options": ["is theoretical", "is longitudinal", "is embargoed"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c10", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "is longitudinal", "unit_id": "u033152", "pair_id": "u033152-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/12/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033152-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc"], "theory_hash": "54526f20742d44a0", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a16", "a9", "a0"]}, "attempt": 1}}
{"id": "syn-u033169-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar is not longitudinal. Hadar is not budgeted. Deneb is not budgeted. Gemma is longitudinal. Gemma is not budgeted. Deneb is not resubmitted. Hadar is not resubmitted. Kochab is not resubmitted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is budgeted: then it has ethics clearance. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is not resubmitted: then it has a steering committee. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is not budgeted: then it is multicenter. Question: Is it so that Hadar is longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u033169", "pair_id": "u033169-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033169-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "9f668b2b7e2f78d7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u033169-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar is not longitudinal. Hadar is not budgeted. Deneb is not budgeted. Gemma is longitudinal. Gemma is not budgeted. Deneb is not resubmitted. Hadar is resubmitted. Kochab is not resubmitted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that proposal is budgeted: then it has ethics clearance. Policy II. Suppose that proposal is not resubmitted: then it has a steering committee. Policy III. Suppose that proposal is not budgeted: then it is multicenter. Question: Is it so that Hadar is longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u033169", "pair_id": "u033169-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033169-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "2d41ceeccf484de5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u033169-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar is not longitudinal. Hadar is not budgeted. Deneb is not budgeted. Gemma is longitudinal. Gemma is not budgeted. Deneb is not resubmitted. Hadar is not resubmitted. Kochab is not resubmitted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is budgeted, it then has ethics clearance. #2 Each time a proposal is not resubmitted, it then has a steering committee. #3 Each time a proposal is not budgeted, it then is multicenter. Question: Do the terms above show that Hadar is longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u033169", "pair_id": "u033169-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033169-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "9f668b2b7e2f78d7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u033169-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Hadar is not longitudinal. Hadar is not budgeted. Deneb is not budgeted. Gemma is longitudinal. Gemma is not budgeted. Deneb is not resubmitted. Hadar is resubmitted. Kochab is not resubmitted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a proposal is budgeted, it then has ethics clearance. #2 Each time a proposal is not resubmitted, it then has a steering committee. #3 Each time a proposal is not budgeted, it then is multicenter. Question: Do the terms above show that Hadar is longitudinal?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v04", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u033169", "pair_id": "u033169-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/6/value", "label_flip": false, "edit_relevant": false, "paraphrase_group": "u033169-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "2d41ceeccf484de5", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a3", "neg": false}, "attempt": 2}}
{"id": "syn-u033176-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus is not replicated. Nimbus is not mirrored. Nimbus is not monitored.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is mirrored: then it is sharded. Policy II. Suppose that workload is replicated: then it is not deprecated. Policy III. Suppose that workload is not mirrored: then it is not isolated. Question: Is it so that Nimbus is deprecated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u033176", "pair_id": "u033176-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033176-edit", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "d8a6a167cfb3ed7a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033176-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Nimbus is not replicated. Nimbus is not mirrored. Nimbus is not monitored.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that workload is mirrored: then it is sharded. Policy II. Suppose that workload is not monitored: then it is deprecated. Policy III. Suppose that workload is replicated: then it is not deprecated. Policy IV. Suppose that workload is not mirrored: then it is not isolated. Question: Is it so that Nimbus is deprecated?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c02", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u033176", "pair_id": "u033176-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/1", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033176-orig", "rule_types": ["neg"], "theory_hash": "65a361c40db5cd1e", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a1", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033197-t02-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is backported. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 99. Quartz is not minified. Gneiss is not merged. Gneiss is not minified. Quartz is not merged. Gneiss is signed. Quartz has a lint backlog of 77. Gneiss has a patch cycle of 18. Quartz is backported. Gneiss is localized.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is backported, and is merged, that build has no migration script. Item B. When the build is minified, that build has no security advisory. Item C. When the build is localized, that build is tested. Item D. When the build has a migration script, that build is notarized. Item E. When the build has a patch cycle of no more than 29, that build has a migration script. Item F. When the build is notarized, and has a patch cycle of no less than 19, and is backported, that build is not reproducible. Item G. When the build has a migration script, and has a patch cycle of no more than 34, and is signed, that build is benchmarked. Item H. When the build is minified, that build is not versioned. Item I. When the build is backported, that build is not benchmarked. Item J. When the build has a patch cycle of no more than 85, that build is versioned. Item K. When the build has a lint backlog of less than 71, and is signed, that build has a security advisory. Item L. When the build is notarized, and has a patch cycle of less than 19, and is tested, that build is reproducible. Item H outranks Item J. Item B outranks Item K. Item G outranks Item I. Item A outranks Item E. Item F outranks Item L. Question: Can one infer that Gneiss is reproducible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u033197", "pair_id": "u033197-t02", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033197-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "a96bf22326711bfb", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u033197-t02-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Gneiss is backported. Gneiss has a lint backlog of 99. Quartz is not minified. Gneiss is not merged. Gneiss is not minified. Quartz is not merged. Gneiss is signed. Quartz has a lint backlog of 77. Gneiss has a patch cycle of 20. Quartz is backported. Gneiss is localized.", "instruction": "Item A. When the build is backported, and is merged, that build has no migration script. Item B. When the build is minified, that build has no security advisory. Item C. When the build is localized, that build is tested. Item D. When the build has a migration script, that build is notarized. Item E. When the build has a patch cycle of no more than 29, that build has a migration script. Item F. When the build is notarized, and has a patch cycle of no less than 19, and is backported, that build is not reproducible. Item G. When the build has a migration script, and has a patch cycle of no more than 34, and is signed, that build is benchmarked. Item H. When the build is minified, that build is not versioned. Item I. When the build is backported, that build is not benchmarked. Item J. When the build has a patch cycle of no more than 85, that build is versioned. Item K. When the build has a lint backlog of less than 71, and is signed, that build has a security advisory. Item L. When the build is notarized, and has a patch cycle of less than 19, and is tested, that build is reproducible. Item H outranks Item J. Item B outranks Item K. Item G outranks Item I. Item A outranks Item E. Item F outranks Item L. Question: Can one infer that Gneiss is reproducible?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t02", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c21", "vocabulary_id": "v05", "block": "train", "depth": 3, "unit_depth": 3, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u033197", "pair_id": "u033197-t02", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_number", "edit_path": "/facts/8/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033197-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "thr", "pri"], "theory_hash": "fe0e2209970b63a7", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 4}}
{"id": "syn-u033212-t04-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren has a risk tier of 10. Evren has a credit rating of 94. Evren is creditworthy. Evren is indebted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower has a risk tier no higher than 59: then it has no lien. Policy II. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy: then it is not foreclosed. Policy III. Suppose that borrower has a credit rating smaller than 15: then it has no guarantor. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy: then it is a depositor. Question: Is it so that Evren has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u033212", "pair_id": "u033212-t04", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033212-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "acdb95c3709490b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033212-t04-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren has a risk tier of 10. Evren has a credit rating of 94. Evren is creditworthy. Evren is indebted.", "instruction": "Policy I. Suppose that borrower is indebted: then it has a guarantor. Policy II. Suppose that borrower has a risk tier no higher than 59: then it has no lien. Policy III. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy: then it is not foreclosed. Policy IV. Suppose that borrower has a credit rating smaller than 15: then it has no guarantor. Policy V. Suppose that borrower is creditworthy: then it is a depositor. Question: Is it so that Evren has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t04", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u033212", "pair_id": "u033212-t04", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033212-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "c9dfce96b5510a7a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033212-t05-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren has a risk tier of 10. Evren has a credit rating of 94. Evren is creditworthy. Evren is indebted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower has a risk tier of 59 or below, it then has no lien. #2 Each time a borrower is creditworthy, it then is not foreclosed. #3 Each time a borrower has a credit rating less than 15, it then has no guarantor. #4 Each time a borrower is creditworthy, it then is a depositor. Question: Do the terms above show that Evren has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u033212", "pair_id": "u033212-t05", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033212-edit", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "acdb95c3709490b8", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033212-t05-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Evren has a risk tier of 10. Evren has a credit rating of 94. Evren is creditworthy. Evren is indebted.", "instruction": "#1 Each time a borrower is indebted, it then has a guarantor. #2 Each time a borrower has a risk tier of 59 or below, it then has no lien. #3 Each time a borrower is creditworthy, it then is not foreclosed. #4 Each time a borrower has a credit rating less than 15, it then has no guarantor. #5 Each time a borrower is creditworthy, it then is a depositor. Question: Do the terms above show that Evren has a guarantor?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 0, "meta": {"template_id": "t05", "template_group": "tg1", "composition_id": "c04", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 1, "unit_depth": 1, "label": "True", "unit_id": "u033212", "pair_id": "u033212-t05", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "rule_remove", "edit_path": "/rules/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033212-orig", "rule_types": ["thr"], "theory_hash": "c9dfce96b5510a7a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a7", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033249-t06-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has a debt ratio of 71. Bastien is not underwritten.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has no escrow account while has a debt ratio at or below 23, thus it is solvent. Question: Would it be right to say that Bastien is delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u033249", "pair_id": "u033249-t06", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033249-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8ebdbdc95f341f2a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033249-t06-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not delinquent. Bastien has a debt ratio of 71. Bastien is not underwritten.", "instruction": "Provision 1: when the borrower here has no escrow account while has a debt ratio at or below 23, thus it is solvent. Question: Would it be right to say that Bastien is delinquent?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t06", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u033249", "pair_id": "u033249-t06", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033249-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "069c5b84515e9c13", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033249-t07-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has a debt ratio of 71. Bastien is not underwritten.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has no escrow account and further has a debt ratio of maximum 23, it thereby is solvent. Question: Statement: Bastien is delinquent. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u033249", "pair_id": "u033249-t07", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033249-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8ebdbdc95f341f2a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033249-t07-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not delinquent. Bastien has a debt ratio of 71. Bastien is not underwritten.", "instruction": "Point A. If said borrower has no escrow account and further has a debt ratio of maximum 23, it thereby is solvent. Question: Statement: Bastien is delinquent. Does it hold?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t07", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u033249", "pair_id": "u033249-t07", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033249-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "069c5b84515e9c13", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033249-t08-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien has a debt ratio of 71. Bastien is not underwritten.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has no escrow account and likewise has a debt ratio not above 23, so it is solvent. Question: Is the claim \"Bastien is delinquent\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "Unknown", "unit_id": "u033249", "pair_id": "u033249-t08", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033249-edit", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "8ebdbdc95f341f2a", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033249-t08-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "binary", "state": "Bastien is not delinquent. Bastien has a debt ratio of 71. Bastien is not underwritten.", "instruction": "No. 1 While the given borrower has no escrow account and likewise has a debt ratio not above 23, so it is solvent. Question: Is the claim \"Bastien is delinquent\" true, false, or unknown?", "options": ["True", "False", "Unknown"], "target": 1, "meta": {"template_id": "t08", "template_group": "tg2", "composition_id": "c07", "vocabulary_id": "v00", "block": "train", "depth": 0, "unit_depth": 0, "label": "False", "unit_id": "u033249", "pair_id": "u033249-t08", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_remove", "edit_path": "/facts/0", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033249-orig", "rule_types": ["conj", "neg", "thr"], "theory_hash": "069c5b84515e9c13", "query": {"type": "binary", "entity": "e0", "attr": "a2", "neg": false}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033270-t01-edit", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tundra is not backed up. Tundra has no dedicated host. Tundra is provisioned. Tundra is stateless.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload has a dedicated host, it also is throttled. Clause 2: once any workload is backed up, it also is idle. Clause 3: once any workload has a firewall, it also is sandboxed. Clause 4: once any workload is virtualized, it also is not patched. Clause 5: once any workload is mirrored, it also is cached. Clause 6: once any workload is throttled, it also is containerized. Clause 7: once any workload is isolated, it also is virtualized. Clause 8: once any workload is not stateless, it also is autoscaled. Clause 9: once any workload has no dedicated host, it also is mirrored. Clause 10: once any workload has a GPU, it also has a firewall. Clause 11: once any workload is virtualized, it also has a failover node. Clause 12: once any workload is autoscaled, it also is patched. Clause 2 does not hold for a workload when any workload is provisioned. Clause 4 overrides Clause 12. Question: Which of these is true of Tundra?", "options": ["is sandboxed", "has a failover node", "is containerized", "is cached", "is patched"], "target": 3, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is cached", "unit_id": "u033270", "pair_id": "u033270-t01", "pair_role": "edit", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033270-edit", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "aa489cf287f46a4e", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a10", "a1", "a2", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}
{"id": "syn-u033270-t01-orig", "source": "synthetic", "task_type": "multi_choice", "state": "Tundra is not backed up. Tundra has a dedicated host. Tundra is provisioned. Tundra is stateless.", "instruction": "Clause 1: once any workload has a dedicated host, it also is throttled. Clause 2: once any workload is backed up, it also is idle. Clause 3: once any workload has a firewall, it also is sandboxed. Clause 4: once any workload is virtualized, it also is not patched. Clause 5: once any workload is mirrored, it also is cached. Clause 6: once any workload is throttled, it also is containerized. Clause 7: once any workload is isolated, it also is virtualized. Clause 8: once any workload is not stateless, it also is autoscaled. Clause 9: once any workload has no dedicated host, it also is mirrored. Clause 10: once any workload has a GPU, it also has a firewall. Clause 11: once any workload is virtualized, it also has a failover node. Clause 12: once any workload is autoscaled, it also is patched. Clause 2 does not hold for a workload when any workload is provisioned. Clause 4 overrides Clause 12. Question: Which of these is true of Tundra?", "options": ["is sandboxed", "has a failover node", "is containerized", "is cached", "is patched"], "target": 2, "meta": {"template_id": "t01", "template_group": "tg0", "composition_id": "c26", "vocabulary_id": "v02", "block": "train", "depth": 2, "unit_depth": 2, "label": "is containerized", "unit_id": "u033270", "pair_id": "u033270-t01", "pair_role": "orig", "edit_type": "fact_flip", "edit_path": "/facts/1/value", "label_flip": true, "edit_relevant": true, "paraphrase_group": "u033270-orig", "rule_types": ["neg", "exc", "pri"], "theory_hash": "ceaa1fca2fd34b30", "query": {"type": "multi_choice", "entity": "e0", "candidates": ["a12", "a10", "a1", "a2", "a11"]}, "attempt": 0}}