id stringlengths 14 14 | text stringlengths 14 7.32k | source stringlengths 47 229 |
|---|---|---|
75d7aff671f8-0 | IN THE HIGH COUR T AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LA W COUR T CIVIL DIVISION (APPELLA TE SIDE) CIVIL
APPEAL NO. 154 OF 2019 BETWEEN KW ACHA GROUP OF COMP ANIES
.…………..…..…………….……………... APPELLANT AND VENDING SER VICES
…………………..…………..…………………..………….. RESPONDENT (Being an appeal from the Ruling and Order
of Hon. E. K. Usui, SPM... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Kwacha_Group_of_Companies_v_Vending_Services__Civil_Appeal_154_of_2019__[2023]_KEHC_25377__KLR___Civ___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
dc598d858252-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE EMPLOYMENT & LABOUR RELA TIONS COUR T AT MOMBASA APPEAL NO.
E048 OF 2021 EUCABETH KERUBO NY ANDIKA……………………………………..APPELLANT VERSUS
INTER SECURITY SER VICES……………………………………….RESPONDENT (Being an Appeal on the whole
Judgment of Hon. F . N. Kyambia – CM at Mombasa delivered on 23rd July 2021 ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Nyandika_v_Inter_Security_Services__Appeal_E048_of_2021__[2023]_KEELRC_2950__KLR___16_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
dc598d858252-1 | dispense justice with fairness, and thus bad in law . The Appellant is seeking the following reliefs:- that the appeal be
allowed with costs. that the trial Court’ s judgment in CM ELR Cause no. 933 of 2019 delivered on 23/7/2021 by Hon.
F.N. Kyambia (MR) Chief Magistrate be set aside. that an award be entered in favou... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Nyandika_v_Inter_Security_Services__Appeal_E048_of_2021__[2023]_KEELRC_2950__KLR___16_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
5772fce51395-0 | Court, issues that present for determination, in my view , are:- whether termination of the Appellant’ s employment was
unfair . whether the Appellant is entitled to the reliefs sought in the trial Court. On the first issue, it was a common ground
that the Appellant was employed by the Respondent as a day security guar... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Nyandika_v_Inter_Security_Services__Appeal_E048_of_2021__[2023]_KEELRC_2950__KLR___16_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
8e36fdadc636-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT ELDORET SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 66 OF 2020
IN THE MA TTER OF THE EST ATE OF JAN CHRIS ESSELINK BILL ESSELINK………………………….1ST
PETITIONER/ADMINISTRA TOR JACKLINE CHEMT AI JOHN………….2ND PETITIONER/ADMINISTRA TOR
NICOLE HENDRICK JE ESSELINK…3RD PETITIONER/ADMINISTRA TOR Coram:... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/In_re_Estate_of_Jan_Chris_Esselink__Deceased___Succession_Cause_66_of_2020__[2023]_KEHC_25439__KLR___20_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
8e36fdadc636-1 | Investment 140760 shares -Bill Esselink 140760 shares-Jackline Chemtai John 140760 shares-Nicole Hendrick Je
Esselink 99450 Shares in East African Breweries Ltd 33150 shares -Bill Esselink 33150 shares-Jackline Chemtai John
33150 shares-Nicole Hendrick Je Esselink 6431 Shares in Kengen 2144 shares-Bill Esselink 2144 sh... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/In_re_Estate_of_Jan_Chris_Esselink__Deceased___Succession_Cause_66_of_2020__[2023]_KEHC_25439__KLR___20_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
0a72ce06c1d4-0 | 10164 shares -Bill Esselink 10164 shares-Jackline Chemtai John 10164 shares-Nicole Hendrick Je Esselink 196310
Shares in Sasini Tea 65437 shares -Bill Esselink 65437 shares-Jackline Chemtai John 65436 shares-Nicole Hendrick Je
Esselink 10400 Shares in Stanbic Holding 3467 shares -Bill Esselink 3467 shares-Jackline Chem... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/In_re_Estate_of_Jan_Chris_Esselink__Deceased___Succession_Cause_66_of_2020__[2023]_KEHC_25439__KLR___20_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
92356eb7dacc-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT NAIROBI COMMERCIAL AND TAX DIVISION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO E01 1 OF 2022 COMMISSIONER OF DOMESTIC TAXES ………………. APPELLANT
VERSUS - LUCAS WAITHAKA GITERE ……………………………. RESPONDENT (Being an appeal from the
judgment of the Tax Appeals Tribunal dated 3rd December 2021 in ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Commissioner_of_Domestic_Taxes_v_Gitere__Income_Tax_Appeal_E011_of_2022__[2023]_KEHC_25421__KLR___Commercial_and_Tax___20_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
92356eb7dacc-1 | Section 51(3) of the TPA gives the format for the notice for objection as follows: - “(3) A notice of objection shall be
treated as validly lodged by a taxpayer under subsection (2) if— a) the notice of objection states precisely the grounds of
objection, the amendments required to be made to correct the decision, and ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Commissioner_of_Domestic_Taxes_v_Gitere__Income_Tax_Appeal_E011_of_2022__[2023]_KEHC_25421__KLR___Commercial_and_Tax___20_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
6fda0b3c3670-0 | documents relating to the objection have been submitted.” From the for going, a notice of objection can only be said to be
valid when all the relevant documents have been submitted. Sub section 4 places an obligation on the Commissioner to
inform the tax payer in writing that a notice of objection does not meet the req... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Commissioner_of_Domestic_Taxes_v_Gitere__Income_Tax_Appeal_E011_of_2022__[2023]_KEHC_25421__KLR___Commercial_and_Tax___20_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
19da6f3b3ecc-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT ELDORET CIVIL CASE NO. 3 OF 2022
(FORMERL Y KITALE ELC CASE NO. 5 OF 2016 AMIT AGGAR WAL (suing as administrator of the estate of
GURCHARAN DASS AGGAR WAL)…………………………………PLAINTIFF VERSUS NA TIONAL BANK OF
KENY A LIMITED…………………………………..DEFENDANT RULING By the Plaint f... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Aggarwal__Suing_as_Administrator_of_the__Estate_of_Gurcharan_Dass_Aggarwal__v_National_Bank_of_Kenya_Limited__Civil_Case_5_of_2016__[2023]_KEHC_25383__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
19da6f3b3ecc-1 | and added that it is now over 5 years since the amount was placed in a non-interest earning account thus causing him
tremendous loss and that the Defendant does not stand to suf fer any loss if the prayers are granted. Defendant’ s Response
The Defendant opposed the Application vide the Replying Affidavit sworn by one ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Aggarwal__Suing_as_Administrator_of_the__Estate_of_Gurcharan_Dass_Aggarwal__v_National_Bank_of_Kenya_Limited__Civil_Case_5_of_2016__[2023]_KEHC_25383__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
7f0899f081cb-0 | interest, on 14/09/2017 the Kshs 9,000,000/- was deposited into the Call Deposit Account to enable the account attract
interest as ordered by the Court, as at the date of swearing the Affidavit, the accrued interest stood at Kshs. 2,348,876.71,
the averments that there is non-compliance with the Court order is far -fet... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Aggarwal__Suing_as_Administrator_of_the__Estate_of_Gurcharan_Dass_Aggarwal__v_National_Bank_of_Kenya_Limited__Civil_Case_5_of_2016__[2023]_KEHC_25383__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
7f0899f081cb-1 | Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates vs National Bank of Kenya Limited [2020] eKLR. Counsel submitted further that
in reality the Plaintif f seeks variation of the Court order , which cannot be said to be review , he attempts to re-write the
terms of the order rather than correct an error apparent. He cited the case of Ho... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Aggarwal__Suing_as_Administrator_of_the__Estate_of_Gurcharan_Dass_Aggarwal__v_National_Bank_of_Kenya_Limited__Civil_Case_5_of_2016__[2023]_KEHC_25383__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
2d61137e292d-0 | Defendant’ s officers for contempt. Analysis & Determination The issue for determination in this matter is “whether the
Court should review , vary or set aside the consent order dated 21/12/2016 and also grant the consequential orders prayed
for”. It is trite law that any party seeking review of Court orders is bound b... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Aggarwal__Suing_as_Administrator_of_the__Estate_of_Gurcharan_Dass_Aggarwal__v_National_Bank_of_Kenya_Limited__Civil_Case_5_of_2016__[2023]_KEHC_25383__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
2d61137e292d-1 | the bank, who makes a request for such transfer and to whom, in any event, all the interest accrued belongs to, not the
bank. It is therefore very well possible, as I believe, that the transfer of the funds to the Call Deposit Account was done in
utmost good faith and meant, in the long run, to benefit and be advantage... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Aggarwal__Suing_as_Administrator_of_the__Estate_of_Gurcharan_Dass_Aggarwal__v_National_Bank_of_Kenya_Limited__Civil_Case_5_of_2016__[2023]_KEHC_25383__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
88672dc389cb-0 | intentioned the Defendant could have been when it transferred the funds to the Call Deposit Account. Save with the
concurrence of the Plaintif f, the Defendant had no right to unilaterally , and without consultation, transfer the funds to any
different Account, whether ancillary , associated, connected or related to th... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Aggarwal__Suing_as_Administrator_of_the__Estate_of_Gurcharan_Dass_Aggarwal__v_National_Bank_of_Kenya_Limited__Civil_Case_5_of_2016__[2023]_KEHC_25383__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
4a798122779d-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELA TIONS COUR T OF KENY A AT NAIROBI
MISCELLANEOUS CAUSE NO. E157 OF 2023 OLIVER THANDI MUNYUA APPLICANT - VERSUS - ABSA
BANK KENY A PLC……………...………RESPONDENT (Before Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya on Friday 17th
November , 2023) RULING The applicant filed the application... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Munyua_v_ABSA_Bank_Kenya_PLC__Miscellaneous_Cause_E157_of_2023__[2023]_KEELRC_2941__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
b151ffc732ce-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELA TIONS COUR T OF KENY A AT NAIROBI
PETITION NO. E25 OF 2023 (Formerly ELRC Petition No. E009 OF 2021 at Nyeri) MESHACK KHISA PETITIONER
- VERSUS - KENY A PLANT ATION AND AGRICUL TURAL WORKERS UNION RESPONDENT (Before Hon.
Justice Byram Ongaya on Friday 17th Novemb... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Khisa_v_Kenya_Plantation_and_Agricultural_Workers_Union__Petition_E25_of_2023__[2023]_KEELRC_2943__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
b151ffc732ce-1 | Avatar Sing Bhamra & Another V. Oriental Commercial Bank, Kisumu High Court Civil case No. 53 of 2004. The
parties filed their respective submissions. The court has considered the parties’ respective positions and makes finding as
follows. The only issue is whether the petition is trapped by the principle of constitut... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Khisa_v_Kenya_Plantation_and_Agricultural_Workers_Union__Petition_E25_of_2023__[2023]_KEELRC_2943__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
34e46362e16c-0 | 41, 50(1) and 47 (1) of the Constitution as set out in paragraphs 36 to 45 of the petition. The petitioner prays for a
declaration that his rights and fundamental freedoms were violated. How then can the Court decide the issues without
taking evidence on the express alleged constitutional violations? It appears that as... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Khisa_v_Kenya_Plantation_and_Agricultural_Workers_Union__Petition_E25_of_2023__[2023]_KEELRC_2943__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
ed719b70540c-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELA TIONS COUR T OF KENY A AT
MACHAKOS CAUSE NO.E006 OF 2022 P ATRICK MWONGERA NJIIRI CLAIMANT - VERSUS - MARS
WRIGLEY CONFECTIONER Y (K) LIMITED..................................................................RESPONDENT (Before Hon.
Justice Byram Ongaya on Friday ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Njiiri_v_Mars_Wrigley_Confectionery__K__Limited__Cause_E006_of_2022__[2023]_KEELRC_2951__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
ed719b70540c-1 | remedies. No submissions were made for the claimant to specifically justify the remedies as claimed and prayed for . As
urged for the respondent, none is justified. The claimant’ s suit has failed and is liable to dismissal with costs. In
conclusion judgement is hereby entered for the respondent against the claimant fo... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Njiiri_v_Mars_Wrigley_Confectionery__K__Limited__Cause_E006_of_2022__[2023]_KEELRC_2951__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
8be58b88b40f-0 | delivered by video-link and in court at Nairobi this Friday 17th November , 2023. BYRAM ONGA YA PRINCIP AL
JUDGE | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Njiiri_v_Mars_Wrigley_Confectionery__K__Limited__Cause_E006_of_2022__[2023]_KEELRC_2951__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
619dbd4b4b9d-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT MAKUENI IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT
MAKUENI CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION (REV) NO. 127/2022. IN THE MA TTER OF ARTICLES 22(1) 23 (1) (3)
(d), 24(1) (d), 2(a) (b) (c), 25 (a), 20 (1) (2) (3) (a), 47, 48, 51(1), 52, 159, 165 (3) (d) (ii), 258(i) & (ii), 259(i), 27, 48, &... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Masesi_v_Republic__Constitutional_Petition_127_of_2022__[2023]_KEHC_25430__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
c7efcfc57b0e-0 | IN THE HIGH COUR T AT NAIROBI CIVIL DIVISION (APPELLA TE SIDE) CORAM: D. S. MAJANJA J. CIVIL
APPEAL NO. E187 OF 2022 BETWEEN NGUI KA TUVI
………………..…………………………………..………………... 1ST APPELLANT DERICK KY ALO KISALU
…………….…….………………………………….… 2ND APPELLANT AND JOHN WAKIRI KIRE
………………………………………………………………... RESPONDENT (Being a... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Katuvi___another_v_Kire__Civil_Appeal_E187_of_2022__[2023]_KEHC_25363__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
c7efcfc57b0e-1 | amount in a joint interest earning account in the names of the Advocates of the Appellants and the Respondent within 21
days from the date hereof. The Appellants shall pay costs of the proceeding in the Subordinate Court and of this Appeal
assessed at Kshs. 35,000.00 within 21 days from the date hereof. The Response to... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Katuvi___another_v_Kire__Civil_Appeal_E187_of_2022__[2023]_KEHC_25363__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
86434aed2b8a-0 | instructed by Kimondo Gachoka and Company Advocates for the Appellants. Mr Abdirazak instructed by Roba and
Associates Advocates for the Respondent. | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Katuvi___another_v_Kire__Civil_Appeal_E187_of_2022__[2023]_KEHC_25363__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
ef8ad0794f41-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO. 461 OF 201 1 TOM
K’OPERE trading as T. O K’OPERE & CO. ADVOCA TES.............................. APPELLANT -VERSUS- THE
DISCIPLINAR Y COMMITTEE OF THE LSK...............................................1ST RESPONDENT SISTER MAR Y
DOMINIC SA ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/K'Opere_trading_as_TO_K’Opere___Co_Advocates_v_Disciplinary_Committee_of_the_LSK___another__Civil_Appeal_461_of_2011__[2023]_KEHC_25353__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
ef8ad0794f41-1 | absence of any consent from the Land Control Board, and the property remaining in the name of the deceased, the only
claim the complainants may have is over any sums paid towards the transaction and not the property , which confirm the
position that no documents of the title could be released to the complainants. The d... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/K'Opere_trading_as_TO_K’Opere___Co_Advocates_v_Disciplinary_Committee_of_the_LSK___another__Civil_Appeal_461_of_2011__[2023]_KEHC_25353__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
16d2a79429bd-0 | judgment/order/conviction of the appellant by the disciplinary committee was arrived at based on an erroneous
reasoning, failure to appreciate the facts and evidence before the committee and based on wrong conclusions. The parties
filed written submissions as follows: the appellant submitted that the disciplinary commi... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/K'Opere_trading_as_TO_K’Opere___Co_Advocates_v_Disciplinary_Committee_of_the_LSK___another__Civil_Appeal_461_of_2011__[2023]_KEHC_25353__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
fe64dbfe3d25-0 | advocate pursuant to section 55 of the Advocates Act. This being a first appeal, the duty of the 1st appellate court is to re-
evaluate the evidence before the Disciplinary Committee and to come up with its own conclusion whether to support the
findings of the committee. In Selle –Vs- Associated Motor Boat Co. [1968] E... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/K'Opere_trading_as_TO_K’Opere___Co_Advocates_v_Disciplinary_Committee_of_the_LSK___another__Civil_Appeal_461_of_2011__[2023]_KEHC_25353__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
44c8fad43114-0 | IN THE HIGH COUR T AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LA W COUR T CIVIL DIVISION (APPELLA TE SIDE) CIVIL
APPEAL NO. E091 OF 2021 BETWEEN NKOROI BUNDI KEL VIN
.…………..…..…………….……………….…………….. APPELLANT AND WILSON RUNY AMBO
………………..…………..…………………..………….. RESPONDENT (Being an appeal from the Judgment and
Decree of Hon. D.W . Mburu, SPM... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Kelvin_v_Runyambo__Civil_Appeal_E091_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25388__KLR___Civ___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
44c8fad43114-1 | note that the victims therein suf fered more serious and greater disability . Although the cases cited by the Respondent
were decided in 2004 and 2008, those cited by the Appellant were more recent and reflective of the trend of damages
awarded in cases of where the victims sustained similar injuries. Since the award o... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Kelvin_v_Runyambo__Civil_Appeal_E091_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25388__KLR___Civ___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
4009de329d6b-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT KENY A CRIMINAL CASE NO. 14 OF 2018
REPUBLIC………....………………………………………PROSECUTION VERSUS GIDEON CHERUIYOT
LANGA T.....................................ACCUSED JUDGMENT The Accused is char ged with three counts of Murder contrary
to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Republic_v_Langat__Criminal_Case_14_of_2018__[2023]_KEHC_25401__KLR___16_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
4009de329d6b-1 | 5th July , 2018 at around 1 1:30 pm he was at his home sleeping when he received a call from DCIO Belgut informing him
about a murder that has occurred at Belgut, he proceeded to the crime scene and found 3 bodies in a house belonging to
the accused person herein. Upon inquiring they were informed that the accused pers... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Republic_v_Langat__Criminal_Case_14_of_2018__[2023]_KEHC_25401__KLR___16_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
37d05ffc4047-0 | accused was wearing a blood stained vest, marked as MF1-1 1. Pw . 6 testified that on 9th July , 2018 he witnessed the post
mortems on the deceased and that on 1 1th July , 2018 sent various exhibits to the government analyst. He subsequently
charged the accused with murder upon completing investigation. Pw . 6 proceed... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Republic_v_Langat__Criminal_Case_14_of_2018__[2023]_KEHC_25401__KLR___16_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
37d05ffc4047-1 | application and of criminal responsibility that a man cannot be condemned if it is proved that at the time of the of fence he
was not a master of his mind.” The Learned Counsel relied on the case of Richard Chemagong v Republic, Criminal
Appeal No. 150 of 1983 where the Court of Appeal made reference to the McNaughten ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Republic_v_Langat__Criminal_Case_14_of_2018__[2023]_KEHC_25401__KLR___16_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
b4ee07484e1e-0 | omission made, then if it appears to the court before which the person is tried that he did the act or made the omission
charged but was insane at the time he did or made it, the court shall make a special finding to the ef fect that the accused
was guilty of the act or omission char ged but was insane when he did the ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Republic_v_Langat__Criminal_Case_14_of_2018__[2023]_KEHC_25401__KLR___16_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
07c7e8eb8b04-0 | IN THE HIGH COUR T AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LA W COUR TS CIVIL DIVISION (APPELLA TE SIDE) CORAM:
D. S. MAJANJA J. CIVIL APPEAL NO. E793 OF 2021 BETWEEN LA SALLE CA THOLIC PRIMAR Y SCHOOL
………………..……………………. APPELLANT AND EAGLE GROUP INTERNA TIONAL LIMITED
……………………………….. RESPONDENT (Being an appeal from the Ruling and... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/La_Salle_Catholic_Primary_School_v_Eagle_Group_International_Limited__Civil_Appeal_E793_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25358__KLR___Civ___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
07c7e8eb8b04-1 | the court and parties are aware of timelines embedded in the SCCA and the Adjudicator is empowered to give appropriate
directions. For the reasons I have given, I allow the appeal. I remand the matter to the Small Claims Court to give
direction on the Respondent’ s request to file a formal application bearing in mind ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/La_Salle_Catholic_Primary_School_v_Eagle_Group_International_Limited__Civil_Appeal_E793_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25358__KLR___Civ___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
8d392aced34d-0 | NAIROBI this 17th day of NOVEMBER 2023. D. S. MAJANJA JUDGE Mr Situma instructed by KWEW Advocates
LLP for the Appellant. Mr Wachira instructed by Wachira Gachoka and Company Advocates for the Respondent. | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/La_Salle_Catholic_Primary_School_v_Eagle_Group_International_Limited__Civil_Appeal_E793_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25358__KLR___Civ___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
84a8b44f4adb-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT BUNGOMA CIVIL APPEAL NO. E040 OF 2021
JIANGXI KHONGMEI ENG. COMP ANY LTD--------------APPELLANT -VERSUS- ELIUD WAFULA MAELO--------
--------------------------------RESPONDENT (Being an appeal arising from the Ruling by Hon. G.P . OMONDI (S.R.M) in
Bungoma Civil ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Jiangxi_Khongmei_Eng._Company_Ltd_v_Maelo__Civil_Appeal_E040_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25412__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
84a8b44f4adb-1 | and stated that it filed an ar guable defence denying the Respondents claim and that it was only fair that they be allowed
to prosecute their case and by so doing the Respondent would not be prejudiced in any way It was further submitted that
the sum involved was colossal and that the Appellant was disputing the car hi... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Jiangxi_Khongmei_Eng._Company_Ltd_v_Maelo__Civil_Appeal_E040_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25412__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
e16f15ce9260-0 | Winnie Wambui Kibinge & 2others vs. Match Electrical Limited Civil Case No. 222 of 2010. It was further submitted
that the Appellant’ s defence raised triable issues and that the Respondent can be compensated by way of costs and that
the decretal sum had been deposited in a joint account. Lastly , the Appellant submitt... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Jiangxi_Khongmei_Eng._Company_Ltd_v_Maelo__Civil_Appeal_E040_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25412__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
e16f15ce9260-1 | annexed to the application, raises triable issues. The Court has wide discretion in such cases to set aside ex
parte judgement. In the instant case, the defence and counterclaim was already in the file when the matter was heard ex
parte and the trial magistrate stated that she considered the same and dismissed the same... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Jiangxi_Khongmei_Eng._Company_Ltd_v_Maelo__Civil_Appeal_E040_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25412__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
5e866492512a-0 | considered at all and indeed could not be considered without the appellant’ s input..... What the Trial Court should have
done when hearing the application to set aside the ex parte judgement was to ignore her judgement on record and look at
the matter afresh considering the pleadings before her and see if on their fac... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Jiangxi_Khongmei_Eng._Company_Ltd_v_Maelo__Civil_Appeal_E040_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25412__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
5e866492512a-1 | proof that they were served and that the court set a date for ruling on the bill of costs for 4th December ,2019 when the
bill of costs was taxed of f at Kshs.513,765/=. On 10th December , 2019 the Appellant came to court with the application
which informed the impugned ruling. It is imperative to note that the current... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Jiangxi_Khongmei_Eng._Company_Ltd_v_Maelo__Civil_Appeal_E040_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25412__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
f17a3b525cf6-0 | This coupled with the fact that counsel for the Appellant was consistently served with notices. I am not persuaded that the
appellant has made out a case for the grant of the discretionary orders to set aside the interlocutory judgement entered
herein. My above findings notwithstanding, this court is still minded to ex... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Jiangxi_Khongmei_Eng._Company_Ltd_v_Maelo__Civil_Appeal_E040_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25412__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
a1b86885fd3d-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COUR T AT MALINDI ELC SUIT NO. 98 OF 2018
SWALEH ABDIL KADIR ……………………………………….………. PLAINTIFF VERSUS NA TIONAL
HOUSING CORPORA TION …………..……………. 1ST DEFENDANT THE HON ATTORNEY GENERAL
………………..…………..… 2ND DEFENDANT JUDGMENT By a Plaint dated 30th April 2018, the Plain... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Kadir_v_National_Housing_Corporation___another__Environment_and_Land_Case_Civil_Suit_98_of_2018__[2023]_KEELC_21582__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
a1b86885fd3d-1 | in the sum of Kshs. 12,000,000/- indicating that being the sum expended in constructing the building back in the year
2002. Special damages must be specifically pleaded and proved. In the case of Swalleh C. Kariuki & another v Viloet
Owiso Okuyu [2021] eKLR the court held that : “Special Damages must be both pleaded an... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Kadir_v_National_Housing_Corporation___another__Environment_and_Land_Case_Civil_Suit_98_of_2018__[2023]_KEELC_21582__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
9e640acb2d40-0 | on Plot No. 5546. On perusal of that document, it shows that the document was prepared in February 2018 yet the
construction was done back in 2002. Again, the total estimation was calculated at Kshs. 12,884,745/-. It is not explained
why the Plaintif f would then claim only a sum of Kshs. 12,000,000/- out of that amoun... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Kadir_v_National_Housing_Corporation___another__Environment_and_Land_Case_Civil_Suit_98_of_2018__[2023]_KEELC_21582__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
4d108d8dff8d-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT NAIROBI COMMERCIAL AND TAX DIVISION
COMMERCIAL CASE NO 391 OF 2015 INDIGO TELCOM LIMITED ……..…………… PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT
AND - INDEPENDENT ELECT ORAL AND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION ……………………..…. 1ST
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT EZRA CHILOBA ……………………… 2ND DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
MA... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Indigo_Telcom_Limited_v_Independent_Electoral_and_Boundaries_Commission___5_others__Commercial_Case_391_of_2015__[2023]_KEHC_25423__KLR___Commercial_and_Tax___20_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
4d108d8dff8d-1 | a case- to-case basis; 4. Whether there is a reasonable reason for the delay . The delay should be explained to the
satisfaction of the court; 5. Whether there will be any prejudice suf fered by the Respondent if the extension is granted; 6.
Whether the application has been brought without undue delay . 7. ...” Fro... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Indigo_Telcom_Limited_v_Independent_Electoral_and_Boundaries_Commission___5_others__Commercial_Case_391_of_2015__[2023]_KEHC_25423__KLR___Commercial_and_Tax___20_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
b85feff2eea7-0 | excess of 4 months. That in my view was in ordinate delay . The same requires an explanation. In explaining the delay , it
was explained that it was the advocate who was conducting the matter who failed to take steps to lodge the appeal. The
law firm representing the applicant admitted that the default was attributable... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Indigo_Telcom_Limited_v_Independent_Electoral_and_Boundaries_Commission___5_others__Commercial_Case_391_of_2015__[2023]_KEHC_25423__KLR___Commercial_and_Tax___20_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
8837f40b906b-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT BUNGOMA MISC APPLICA TION NO. E109 OF
2018 MAR TIN KHAEMBA WEKANYW A-------------------------------APPLICANT VERSUS WAMAL WA SIMIYU &
CO ADVOCA TES-------------------RESPONDENT RULING The application before me is a notice of motion brought
under certificate of ur g... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Wekanywa_v_Wamalwa_Simiyu___Co_Advocates__Miscellaneous_Application_E109_of_2018__[2023]_KEHC_25424__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
47cb92082445-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELA TIONS COUR T OF KENY A AT NAIROBI
ELRC CAUSE NO. 1077 OF 2017 TITUS OMONDI WANY AMA CLAIMANT - VERSUS - ARIST OCRA TS
CONCRETE L TD …………. RESPONDENT (Before Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya on Friday 17th November , 2023)
JUDGMENT The claimant filed the Statement of cl... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Wanyama_v_Aristocrats_Concrete_Ltd__Employment_and_Labour_Relations_Cause_1077_of_2017__[2023]_KEELRC_2945__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
5c84cd293ad6-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT ELDORET PROBA TE AND ADMINISTRA TION
CAUSE NO. E051 OF 2006 IN THE MA TTER OF THE EST ATE OF THE LA TE BENSON MBA TIAH MUY A
BETWEEN ELL Y KURIA MBA TIAH....................................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS
JOHNSON KAHI... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/In_re_Estate_of_Benson_Mbatiah_Muya__Deceased___Probate___Administration_E051_of_2006__[2023]_KEHC_25371__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
5c84cd293ad6-1 | restored to the estate, that the Applicant do account to the estate and its beneficiaries for the proceeds arising from the
sale of the parcel of land Uasin Gishu Kimumu/2373 and deposit the proceeds in Court or in an interest earning account
and that the Grant of Letters of Administration made to one Serah Wanjiku Mba... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/In_re_Estate_of_Benson_Mbatiah_Muya__Deceased___Probate___Administration_E051_of_2006__[2023]_KEHC_25371__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
5a929e2830fc-0 | the estate, after distribution of the estate, this amount will be taken into account and therefore the 2nd Respondent will
not be prejudiced in any way and that the Applicant has been unable to raise the funds and/or get a buyer for the property .
Regarding the 2nd Respondent’ s contention that the Motion of fends Rule... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/In_re_Estate_of_Benson_Mbatiah_Muya__Deceased___Probate___Administration_E051_of_2006__[2023]_KEHC_25371__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
5a929e2830fc-1 | and thus they were unaware of the orders. A perusal of the ruling indicates that there was no advocate for the respondent
on the day of the ruling. In re Estate of Mar garet Njambi Thuo (Deceased) [2020] eKLR the court held as follows on
unreasonable delay; The applicant has not bothered to explain the delay of two mon... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/In_re_Estate_of_Benson_Mbatiah_Muya__Deceased___Probate___Administration_E051_of_2006__[2023]_KEHC_25371__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
eec8d34c9219-0 | of Christopher Kendagor v Christopher Kipkorir , Eldoret ELC No.919 of 2012 the applicant had been given 14 days to
vacate the suit land. He filed an application one day after the 14 days. The application was denied. The court holding
that, the application ought to have come before expiry of the period given to vacate ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/In_re_Estate_of_Benson_Mbatiah_Muya__Deceased___Probate___Administration_E051_of_2006__[2023]_KEHC_25371__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
65c7331262c2-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELA TIONS COUR T OF KENY A AT
MACHAKOS ELRC CAUSE NO. E001 OF 2021 DA VID INY ANI CLAIMANT - VERSUS - PROMASIDOR KENY A
LIMITED ………. RESPONDENT (Before Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya on Friday 17th November , 2023) JUDGMENT
The claimant filed the statement of claim on 02.0... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Inyani_v_Promasidor_Kenya_Limited__Employment_and_Labour_Relations_Cause_E001_of_2021__[2023]_KEELRC_2948__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
65c7331262c2-1 | the claimant for a disciplinary hearing, in which it informed the claimant of his right to be accompanied to the
disciplinary hearing by a fellow work colleague of his choice. The respondent states that the claimant did not request for
additional time to prepare for the disciplinary hearing. By a letter dated 01.04.202... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Inyani_v_Promasidor_Kenya_Limited__Employment_and_Labour_Relations_Cause_E001_of_2021__[2023]_KEELRC_2948__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
c6cf0c58a85b-0 | appeal against the decision to terminate him, however , the claimant did not exercise this right. The parties filed their
respective submissions. The court has considered the parties’ respective cases and makes finding as follows. To answer
the 1st issue, the Court returns that there is no dispute that parties were in... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Inyani_v_Promasidor_Kenya_Limited__Employment_and_Labour_Relations_Cause_E001_of_2021__[2023]_KEELRC_2948__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
c4909c8c70eb-0 | claimant admitted in his testimony that he had communicated as was alleged against him and ur ged that it was in the
respondent’ s best interest. How that could be was not demonstrated at all. As submitted for the respondent, there is
nothing on record which, on a balance of probability , would exculpate the claimant. ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Inyani_v_Promasidor_Kenya_Limited__Employment_and_Labour_Relations_Cause_E001_of_2021__[2023]_KEELRC_2948__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
a7f43c3d8f83-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT NAIROBI COMMERCIAL & TAX DIVISION CIVIL
CASE NO. 303 OF 201 1 HANS JURGEN LANGER…….……………………………..1ST PLAINTIFF VERSUS JOE
MUSYIMI MUT AMBU………….............................1ST DEFENDANT MERCBIMA INTERNA TIONAL (K)
LIMITED………………2ND DEFENDANT RULING The defendants f... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Langer_v_Mutambu___another__Civil_Case_303_of_2011__[2023]_KEHC_25372__KLR___Commercial_and_Tax___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
a7f43c3d8f83-1 | application had been brought after an inordinate delay . The plaintif f further cited Jackline Wakesho v Aroma Café (Cause
No. 212 of 2013) [2014] eKLR that the defendants’ non-compliance with Order 9 rule 9 rendered the proceedings
incompetent. Determination I have considered the application, the response and ar gume... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Langer_v_Mutambu___another__Civil_Case_303_of_2011__[2023]_KEHC_25372__KLR___Commercial_and_Tax___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
e18401b676e5-0 | in court. The defendants again ar gued that notice of entry of judgment was not served on them as required by the rules.
Whether the judgment is irregular The defendants’ argument is that the judgment entered against them is irregular and
should be set aside ex debito justitiae: as a matter of right. Whether a judgmen... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Langer_v_Mutambu___another__Civil_Case_303_of_2011__[2023]_KEHC_25372__KLR___Commercial_and_Tax___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
e18401b676e5-1 | the Court of Appeal reiterated that: [E]ven where the judgement is regular , the court still retains the wide discretion to set
the same aside though if the Court decides to set aside the judgement, depending on the circumstances, it may do so on
conditions that are just. That discretion, being wide, the main concern i... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Langer_v_Mutambu___another__Civil_Case_303_of_2011__[2023]_KEHC_25372__KLR___Commercial_and_Tax___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
889c7fa09c72-0 | ask itself under what conditions, if any , it ought to set aside the judgement and such conditions, if appropriate, must be
just to both the Plaintif f and the Defendant. The decisions af firm that the discretion of the court to set aside a regular
exparte judgment is wide but the discretion must be exercised judicious... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Langer_v_Mutambu___another__Civil_Case_303_of_2011__[2023]_KEHC_25372__KLR___Commercial_and_Tax___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
0bbb419e923a-0 | IN THE COUR T OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (CORAM: OMONDI, JA, IN CHAMBERS)) CIVIL APPLICA TION NO.
E093 OF 2023 BETWEEN RICHARD MAPESA MATULI APPLICANT AND ADAM AMBANI MULANDA
RESPONDENT (An application for extension of time to file Notice of Appeal out of time, and leave to file appeal out of
time from the ruling of the ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Matuli_v_Mulanda__Civil_Application_E093_of_2023__[2023]_KECA_1367__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
c58094f56f81-0 | IN THE COUR T OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (CORAM: OMONDI, JA. (IN CHAMBERS)) CIVIL APPLICA TION
NO.085 OF 2023 RICHARD JESOME WASIKE APPLICANT AND ANTHONY LUSENAKA .................................
1ST RESPONDENT INDEPENDENT ELECT ORAL AND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION 2ND RESPONDENT
(Being an application for extension of time... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Wasike_v_Lusenaka___another__Civil_Application_085_of_2023__[2023]_KECA_1368__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
c58094f56f81-1 | (2017) eKLR. The second issue that is raised relates to whether this Court has jurisdiction to enlar ge time for hearing of
an election petition. The 1st respondent submits that Article 87 of the Constitution provides that Parliament shall enact
legislation to establish mechanisms for timely settling of election disput... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Wasike_v_Lusenaka___another__Civil_Application_085_of_2023__[2023]_KECA_1368__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
bc5e4d780b71-0 | [2019] eKLR , the 1st respondent contends that a substantive hearing of an Election Petition cannot continue where the
timelines for hearing a petition have already lapsed. The respondent ar gues that in this instance, the Petition was struck
out in its entirety vide an application. The petition did not proceed to a fu... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Wasike_v_Lusenaka___another__Civil_Application_085_of_2023__[2023]_KECA_1368__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
bc5e4d780b71-1 | silence in section 75(4) and non-inclusion in section 85(A) of the Elections Act notwithstanding, a right of appeal still
lies to the Court of Appeal from the High Court, in an election petition concerning membership of a County Assembly , in
view of Article 164(3) of the Constitution. After citing its earlier decision... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Wasike_v_Lusenaka___another__Civil_Application_085_of_2023__[2023]_KECA_1368__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
713afc265d2d-0 | Supreme Court stridently put the matter to rest in the following words: ….[I]t is not dif ficult to critically advert to such
argumentation, as would question the constitutional validity of sections 85A and 75(4) of the Elections Act. In this
context, the starting point, in our view , must be Article 87 of the Constit... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Wasike_v_Lusenaka___another__Civil_Application_085_of_2023__[2023]_KECA_1368__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
751f67058edd-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELA TIONS COUR T OF KENY A AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 1596 OF 2018 ERICK OMERI EMIRA CLAIMANT - VERSUS - SECUREX AGENCIES (K) L TD
………….RESPONDENT (Before Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya on Friday 17th November , 2023) JUDGMENT The
claimant filed the Memorandum of claim on 10.1... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Emira_v_Securex_Agencies__K__Ltd__Cause_1596_of_2018__[2023]_KEELRC_2940__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
751f67058edd-1 | disciplinary hearing on 02.07.2015 and no reason was given for the absence. The claimant having failed to appear for
disciplinary proceedings and having been absent from duty without authority , the respondent summarily dismissed him.
The respondent stated that the claimant showed up at the respondent’ s premises on 13... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Emira_v_Securex_Agencies__K__Ltd__Cause_1596_of_2018__[2023]_KEELRC_2940__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
3ffc73558398-0 | 07.07.2015. the claimant stated that on 07.07.2015 the Human Resource Manager for the second time was very busy to
meet him and the shop steward who had been in a meeting with the Manager asked him to resign like his co-accused
Daniel Ouma had done so as to be paid the worked days. He declined and was asked to go back ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Emira_v_Securex_Agencies__K__Ltd__Cause_1596_of_2018__[2023]_KEELRC_2940__KLR___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
fdcd05c3add3-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 136 OF 2018 TATU
CITY LIMITED.......................................1ST PLAINTIFF KOFINAF COMP ANY LIMITED………………….….2ND
PLAINTIFF VERSUS STEPHEN MBUGUA MW AGIRU………..............1ST DEFENDANT WINFRED WANJIKU
GITONGA ……………….. 2ND DEFENDANT ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Tatu_City_Limited___another_v_Mwagiru___5_others__Civil_Case_136_of_2018__[2023]_KEHC_25354__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
fdcd05c3add3-1 | publications have undermined the reputation of the Plaintif fs in the eyes of the right-thinking members of the society .
Having fallen short of this element, the Plaint does not sustain a defamation suit let alone against the 1st Defendant. The
1st defendant submitted further that the matter is barred by limitation of... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Tatu_City_Limited___another_v_Mwagiru___5_others__Civil_Case_136_of_2018__[2023]_KEHC_25354__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
b4374222ec0c-0 | Kenya. No particulars of any statement uttered by the 1st Defendant have been alleged in the Plaint. The 1st and 2nd
plaintif fs submitted that law is very clear and categorical on the nature of an Application seeking to strike out a suit and
the threshold that must be met. Under Order 2, Rule 15 of the Civil Procedure... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Tatu_City_Limited___another_v_Mwagiru___5_others__Civil_Case_136_of_2018__[2023]_KEHC_25354__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
cf75b2f74e01-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COUR T AT MALINDI ELC MISC. APP. NO. 53 OF
2022 SAFE HA VEN LIMITED ………………………………………………. APPLICANT VERSUS SHARIF
MOHAMAD A. OMAR …………..……………………. 1ST RESPONDENT BOUGANVILLAEA COTT AGES
LIMITED ………………..… 2ND RESPONDENT ORNELLA BONTEMPI LUIGI (Defending in the capacity ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Safe_Haven_Limited_v_Omar___4_others__Environment_and_Land_Miscellaneous_Application_53_of_2022__[2023]_KEELC_21578__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
cf75b2f74e01-1 | but later withdrew and filed ELC 79 of 2017 to the exclusion of the 1st, 2nd and 4th Respondents. The 4th Respondent
also filed a replying af fidavit dated 9th February 2023 where she deponed that following the impugned judgment, the suit
property was transferred back to the 1st and 2nd Respondents who subsequently tra... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Safe_Haven_Limited_v_Omar___4_others__Environment_and_Land_Miscellaneous_Application_53_of_2022__[2023]_KEELC_21578__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
fb9492886b50-0 | subject matter . Whether the reliefs sought by the Applicant should be granted. On the first issue whether the Applicant
has locus standi to file this application, counsel submitted that the simple interpretation of the language used in section
80 of the Civil Procedure Act, and Order 45 of the rules thereunder , was t... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Safe_Haven_Limited_v_Omar___4_others__Environment_and_Land_Miscellaneous_Application_53_of_2022__[2023]_KEELC_21578__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
fb9492886b50-1 | seeks the court to review the judgment. Assuming that the court allows the orders sought how arethey going to be
implemented. Courts do not give orders in vain. It should be noted that the Applicant was at one point a party in ELC 82
of 2014 but chose to withdraw and file ELC No. 79 of 2017 that he now wants the court ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Safe_Haven_Limited_v_Omar___4_others__Environment_and_Land_Miscellaneous_Application_53_of_2022__[2023]_KEELC_21578__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
9acef0058c43-0 | the third wave of Covid-19 pandemic this ruling has been delivered online to the last known email address thereby
waiving Order 21 [1] of the Civil Procedure Rules. | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Safe_Haven_Limited_v_Omar___4_others__Environment_and_Land_Miscellaneous_Application_53_of_2022__[2023]_KEELC_21578__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
c1adcf5e2efb-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO. 594 OF 2018
MUTINDW A FARMERS CO-OPERA TIVE SOCIETY LIMITED……....................................... APPELLANT -
VERSUS- IRIGA FAMERS SOCIETY………………..........1ST RESPONDENT KIRIANI F ARMERS SOCIETY
LTD……………2ND RESPONDENT CO-OP HOLDINGS ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Mutindwa_Farmers_Co-operative_Society_Limited_v_Iriga_Famers_Society___2_others__Civil_Appeal_594_of_2018__[2023]_KEHC_25352__KLR___Civ___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
c1adcf5e2efb-1 | submitted that the appeal was filed out of time. I find that the said issue is one to be canvassed during the appeal. On the
issue as to whether the appeal is statute barred, again I find that the same can be canvassed during the appeal. I find that
striking out of a case no matter how hopeless should be the last resor... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Mutindwa_Farmers_Co-operative_Society_Limited_v_Iriga_Famers_Society___2_others__Civil_Appeal_594_of_2018__[2023]_KEHC_25352__KLR___Civ___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
9432749f6cf2-0 | of the main appeal. The costs of the Application to abide the appeal. Dated, Signed and Delivered online via Microsoft
Teams at Nairobi this 17th day of November , 2023. ………….……………. N. ONGERI JUDGE In the presence of:
……………………………. for the Appellant ……………………………. for the 1st Respondent
……………………………. for the 2nd Respondent... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Mutindwa_Farmers_Co-operative_Society_Limited_v_Iriga_Famers_Society___2_others__Civil_Appeal_594_of_2018__[2023]_KEHC_25352__KLR___Civ___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
9ed49a46f511-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO. E278 OF 2021
GLAXO SMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICAL KENY A LIMITED …………...............................1ST APPELLANT
STELLA KIGUJA NG’ANGA……………………….. 2ND APPELLANT -VERSUS- JOSEPH MULINGE KILO
……………………..........RESPONDENT (Being an appeal from ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Glaxo_Smithkline_Pharmaceutical_Kenya_Limited___another_v_Kilo__Civil_Appeal_E278_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25400__KLR___Civ___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
9ed49a46f511-1 | the High Court is by way of re-trial and the Court of Appeal is not bound to follow the trial judge’ s finding of fact if it
appears either that he failed to take account of particular circumstances or probabilities, or if the impression of the
demeanour of a witness is inconsistent with the evidence generally . An app... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Glaxo_Smithkline_Pharmaceutical_Kenya_Limited___another_v_Kilo__Civil_Appeal_E278_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25400__KLR___Civ___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
13bf58b00bf5-0 | impression based on the demeanor of a witness is inconsistent with the evidence in the case generally .” The issues for
determination are as follows; Whether the trial court was right on its findings on liability . Whether the award of damages
was inordinately high. Whether the trial court failed to considered the defe... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Glaxo_Smithkline_Pharmaceutical_Kenya_Limited___another_v_Kilo__Civil_Appeal_E278_of_2021__[2023]_KEHC_25400__KLR___Civ___17_November_2023___Judgment_.docx.pdf |
e12b596fb51e-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT BUNGOMA CIVIL APPEAL NO.71 OF 2023
IMPACT FINANCE TRUST CDF BUMULA………..1ST APPELLANT/APPLICANT BENARD ANALO
MAKA TIANI T/A BENWEIL AUCTIONEERS ……………………….….2ND APPELLANT/APPLICANT VERSUS
JUDITH MUKHW ANA KOKONY A & ANOTHER .....................1ST RESPONDENT ... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Impact_Finance_Trust_CDF_Bumula___another_v_Kokonya___another___another__Civil_Appeal_71_of_2023__[2023]_KEHC_25413__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
e12b596fb51e-1 | success of appeal as the Respondents will not be in a position to refund the monies already paid to them. I find that the
Appellants have satisfied this condition. As regards the issue of security , the Appellants have averred that they are ready
and willing to provide security for the due performance of the decree and... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Impact_Finance_Trust_CDF_Bumula___another_v_Kokonya___another___another__Civil_Appeal_71_of_2023__[2023]_KEHC_25413__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
37df51bb22fd-0 | their appeal otherwise the same might be rendered nugatory . In order to balance their rival concerns, I find that an order
that the Appellants deposit the entire decretal sums into a joint interest earning account in the joint names of the
Advocates for the parties pending determination of the appeal will be appropria... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Impact_Finance_Trust_CDF_Bumula___another_v_Kokonya___another___another__Civil_Appeal_71_of_2023__[2023]_KEHC_25413__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
745e84a8ff3e-0 | REPUBLIC OF KENY A IN THE HIGH COUR T OF KENY A AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 373 OF 2010
HEZEKIAH OIRA.................................................. PLAINTIFF VERSUS P ATRICK
QUARCOO………................................DEFENDANT RULING The application coming for consideration is the one
dated 6/3/2023 brought under Se... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Oira_v_Quarcoo__Civil_Case_373_of_2010__[2023]_KEHC_25355__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
745e84a8ff3e-1 | the evidential burden must then shift to the respondent to show what resources he has since that is a matter which is
peculiarly within his knowledge.” The applicant contended further that he has complied with the courts directions on
security and ur ged this court to consider the holding in Focin Motorcycle Co. Limite... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Oira_v_Quarcoo__Civil_Case_373_of_2010__[2023]_KEHC_25355__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
dd0a50932285-0 | judgment. My view is that it is suf ficient for the applicant to state that he is ready to provide security or to propose the
kind of security but it is the discretion of the Court to determine the security . The Applicant has of fered to provide
security and has therefore satisfied this ground for stay…” The responden... | https://augmentin.io/casetext/case/Oira_v_Quarcoo__Civil_Case_373_of_2010__[2023]_KEHC_25355__KLR___17_November_2023___Ruling_.docx.pdf |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.