--- license: other license_name: mixed-see-below license_link: https://github.com/DeepBio-Scientific/MIRAGE#provenance--licensing task_categories: - tabular-regression tags: - binding-affinity - drug-discovery - protein-ligand - benchmark - data-leakage pretty_name: MIRAGE configs: - config_name: redundancy data_files: redundancy/test-*.parquet default: true - config_name: temporal data_files: temporal/test-*.parquet --- # MIRAGE: Measuring Interpolation and Redundancy in Affinity GEneralization A benchmark for measuring whether a protein–ligand **binding-affinity** model generalises beyond protein families that are heavily represented in the PDB, or whether its reported accuracy is carried by that redundancy. Frontier co-folding affinity models (Boltz-2, Nesso-1, …) report Pearson ≈ 0.6 on standard benchmarks. When the same models are stratified by protein-family size, that accuracy is concentrated on well-represented families and **collapses to ≈ 0 on singleton families** — exactly the case that matters when starting a program against a novel target. ## Configs ### `redundancy` (18,759 rows, default) PDBbind-derived protein–ligand complexes with experimental affinity, annotated with protein-family size so accuracy can be stratified by redundancy. | column | description | |---|---| | `id` | PDB code | | `sequence` | protein chain (single-letter) | | `smiles` | ligand SMILES (from the deposited structure) | | `pK` | experimental −log10(Kd/Ki/IC50); **higher = stronger** | | `affinity_type` | `Kd` / `Ki` / `IC50` | | `year` | PDB deposition year | | `family_id` | MMseqs2 30%-identity cluster representative | | `family_size` | number of complexes in that family (**the redundancy axis**) | | `redundancy_bin` | `1`, `2-5`, `6-20`, `21-80`, `81-300`, `301+` | | `ligand_nn_tanimoto` | ECFP4 nearest-neighbour similarity to any other ligand | | `in_core` | member of the balanced 3,360-target quick-eval subset | ### `temporal` (649 rows) One structurally novel, post-2021-09-30 target (**OpenBind EV-A71 2A protease**), with measured KD and shipped baselines. Tests within-target ranking on data that no model with a ≤ 2021 cutoff could have seen. | column | description | |---|---| | `id` | Fragalysis code | | `sequence` | target protein | | `smiles` | ligand SMILES | | `pKD` | experimental −log10(KD); higher = stronger | | `baseline_molecular_weight`, `baseline_clogp`, `ref_boltz2` | reference predictions | ## Usage ```python import mirage def my_model(sequence, smiles): return score # higher = stronger binder print(mirage.run_redundancy(my_model).summary()) print(mirage.run_temporal(my_model).summary()) ``` See for the harness, baselines, and CLI. ## Provenance & licensing - **Redundancy set** is derived from **PDBbind** (protein sequences from the PDB; SMILES from deposited ligands; affinities from PDBbind's curated literature values). Only derived annotations are redistributed here, under MIT. Users should observe PDBbind's own terms when using the underlying structures. - **Temporal set** is derived from the **OpenBind A71EV2A** release (CC0) and its public benchmark repository. Family sizes are computed with MMseqs2 at 30% sequence identity / 80% coverage.