--- pretty_name: Evaluation benchmark (Lean proof candidates) language: - en task_categories: - text-classification tags: - lean - lean4 - theorem-proving - formal-verification - code configs: - config_name: default data_files: - split: test path: data/test-00000-of-00001.parquet --- # Evaluation benchmark The paper's **evaluation benchmark** for learned Lean 4 evaluators contains **68,932 deduplicated candidate programs** from three public provers. Each row contains a complete source program and the acceptance label obtained with Lean v4.15.0. | Subset | Programs | Valid | |---|---:|---:| | miniF2F | 41,638 | 25,702 (61.7%) | | ProofNet | 27,294 | 2,443 (9.0%) | | Combined | 68,932 | 28,145 (40.8%) | The remaining 40,787 programs are invalid. Candidates come from Pythagoras-Prover-4B, Goedel-Prover-V2-8B, and DeepSeek-Prover-V2-7B, each run on miniF2F and ProofNet. This benchmark is separate from the training corpus and the 27,210-program in-house validation set used to select thresholds and the self-consistency voting rule. ## Labels and collection `passed` maps to label `1`; `failed` and `wrong_declaration` map to `0`. Timeouts, infrastructure exceptions, `not_run`, and precheck failures are excluded. Labels reflect the collection verifier's acceptance policy, including expected-theorem matching and forbidden constructs, rather than successful elaboration of an arbitrary statement alone. Programs are deduplicated by `(source, lean_version)` and conflicting verdicts are removed. The collection uses a 180-second per-command timeout, 64 concurrent verification jobs, and reuse of loaded Lean environments. miniF2F and ProofNet validity rates differ substantially; report metrics per benchmark as well as pooled results. The release does not assert that theorem statements are disjoint from all evaluator training material. ## Columns | Column | Meaning | |---|---| | `run_id` | Source prover evaluation run | | `benchmark` | `minif2f` or `proofnet` | | `prover_model` | Prover that generated the candidate | | `lean_version` | Toolchain used for the reference verdict | | `problem` | Benchmark problem identifier | | `sample_id` | Generator sample identifier, when available | | `candidate_index` | Candidate position within its source run | | `source` | Complete unannotated Lean source | | `label` | `1` for valid, `0` for invalid | | `status` | `passed`, `failed`, or `wrong_declaration` | | `error_kind` | Error category for invalid candidates; null for valid candidates | ## Load ```python from datasets import load_dataset benchmark = load_dataset("EPFL-LARA/lean-evaluation-benchmark", split="test") source = benchmark[0]["source"] label = benchmark[0]["label"] ``` Use `source` as the model input and reserve `label`, `status`, and `error_kind` for evaluation. ## Results reported in the paper | Evaluator | Accuracy | Macro F1 | MCC | AUROC | |---|---:|---:|---:|---:| | Encoder: ModernBERT-large | 0.586 | 0.563 | 0.372 | 0.862 | | One-token 8B | 0.752 | 0.752 | 0.592 | 0.905 | | One-token 8B, calibrated threshold 0.86 | 0.831 | 0.831 | 0.683 | 0.905 | | Feedback 4B, greedy | 0.851 | 0.851 | 0.733 | — | | Cascade: one-token → greedy feedback | 0.878 | 0.877 | 0.772 | — | | Cascade with 5-sample feedback, 4 valid votes required | 0.888 | 0.887 | 0.783 | — | Default classifier and gate thresholds are 0.5. Calibrated thresholds and the four-of-five self-consistency rule are selected on the separate in-house validation set. Self-consistency uses five traces at temperature 0.8. See the model cards for exact prompts, parsing rules, and serving settings. ## Integrity SHA-256 of `data/test-00000-of-00001.parquet`: `5a59f709b1466d53c72412cb8c7b7bb53cadd131b3a5b4ce8596677f70e2b3aa` ## Paper and related artifacts This is the **evaluation benchmark** described in *Learning Lean Feedback for Efficient Proof-Candidate Evaluation on GPUs*. - [Encoder (ModernBERT-large)](https://huggingface.co/EPFL-LARA/lean-encoder-modernbert-large) - [One-token (Qwen3-8B)](https://huggingface.co/EPFL-LARA/lean-one-token-qwen3-8b) - [Feedback (Qwen3-4B)](https://huggingface.co/EPFL-LARA/lean-feedback-qwen3-4b)