#!/usr/bin/env python3 # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- """HermeneuticDive reference verifier (v3). v2 specified six `match_rule`s as prose only, so no two users could reproduce the same reward. This file is the executable reference. It is deliberately simple, dependency-free and *tested against the shipped data* (`--selftest`). score(row, response, judge=None) -> {"score": float|None, "rule": str, "heuristic": bool, "reason": str} * canonical_or_alias, numeric_with_tolerance, date_match are deterministic. * premise_correction and abstain_or_calibrated_hedge are KEYWORD HEURISTICS (multilingual); for training signal quality use `judge=` (an LLM-judge callable judge(question, rubric, response) -> float in [0,1]) with the row's judge_rubric. * llm_judge rows return score=None unless a judge is supplied. Anti-gaming properties (all asserted by --selftest): a bare "unknown", the question pasted back, an intermediate chain entity, a generic abstention on an answerable row, and a spray of many candidate answers all score 0. Usage: python verifier.py --selftest [dir_with_raw_jsonl] """ import json, re, sys, unicodedata from pathlib import Path FINAL_RE = re.compile(r"(?:final answer|最终答案|最終答案|最終回答|окончательный ответ|अंतिम उत्तर)\s*[::]", re.I) ABSTAIN = ["cannot_be_determined", "cannot be determined", "cannot be established", "can't be determined", "not documented", "no reliable record", "no record", "undocumented", "unknown exact", "无法确定", "無法確定", "无从确定", "尚无定论", "没有可靠记载", "невозможно установить", "не установлен", "достоверно неизвестно", "特定できません", "特定できない", "確定できない", "記録がない", "不明", "निर्धारित नहीं किया जा सकता", "ज्ञात नहीं", "प्रमाणित नहीं"] PREMISE = ["false premise", "incorrect premise", "premise is false", "premise is incorrect", "mistaken premise", "never ", "did not", "didn't", "no such", "only one", "not true", "actually", "in fact", "rather", "没有", "並沒有", "并非", "并没有", "不是", "从未", "實際上", "其实", "实际上", "前提有误", "前提错误", "не ", "никогда", "ошибочн", "неверн", "на самом деле", "ない", "ではない", "なかった", "ではなく", "前提が誤", "誤り", "नहीं", "गलत", "वास्तव में", "कभी नहीं"] MONTHS = {m: i for i, m in enumerate(["january", "february", "march", "april", "may", "june", "july", "august", "september", "october", "november", "december"], 1)} def norm(s): s = unicodedata.normalize("NFC", s or "").lower() s = re.sub(r"[^\w\u0900-\u097f\u3040-\u30ff\u4e00-\u9fff\u0400-\u04ff\s]", " ", s) return re.sub(r"\s+", " ", s).strip() def strip_paren(s): return re.sub(r"\s*[((].*?[))]", "", s or "").strip() def extract_final(text): text = (text or "").strip() ms = list(FINAL_RE.finditer(text)) if ms: return text[ms[-1].end():].strip() lines = [l for l in text.splitlines() if l.strip()] return lines[-1].strip() if lines else "" _CJK = re.compile(r"[\u3040-\u30ff\u4e00-\u9fff]") def _contains(final_n, cand_n): if not cand_n: return False if _CJK.search(cand_n): return cand_n in final_n return re.search(rf"(? 3} t = toks(canon) return len(t & toks(final)) / max(1, len(t)) def rule_for_row(row): """Mirror of build_configs.verifier_for routing (asserted equal in --selftest).""" tt, at = row["task_type"], row["answer"]["answer_type"] if tt == "false_premise": return "premise_correction" if at == "number": return "numeric_with_tolerance" if at == "date": return "date_match" if at == "explanation" and tt in ("multi_hop", "date_sensitive"): return "llm_judge" if tt in ("multi_hop", "date_sensitive"): return "canonical_or_alias" if tt == "unanswerable": return "abstain_or_calibrated_hedge" return "llm_judge" # conflicting_sources, perspective_framing def score(row, response, judge=None, rubric=None): rule = rule_for_row(row) final = extract_final(response) def out(s, h, why): return {"score": s, "rule": rule, "heuristic": h, "reason": why} if not final: return out(0.0, False, "empty answer") if rule == "canonical_or_alias": ok = match_alias(row, final) return out(1.0 if ok else 0.0, False, "match" if ok else "no alias match") if rule == "numeric_with_tolerance": ok = match_numeric(row, final) return out(1.0 if ok else 0.0, False, "within tolerance, unit ok" if ok else "out of tolerance or unit mismatch") if rule == "date_match": ok = match_date(row, final) return out(1.0 if ok else 0.0, False, "date match" if ok else "date mismatch") if rule == "abstain_or_calibrated_hedge": grounded = norm(final) in {norm(x) for x in [row["answer"]["value"]] + row["answer"]["aliases"]} or \ (_has(final, ABSTAIN) and len(final) >= 40) return out(1.0 if grounded else 0.0, True, "grounded abstention/hedge" if grounded else "no grounded abstention") if rule == "premise_correction": ok = _has(final, PREMISE) and (match_alias(row, final) or _content_overlap(row["answer"]["value"], final) >= 0.5) return out(1.0 if ok else 0.0, True, "premise corrected" if ok else "no premise correction with corrected fact") # llm_judge if judge is None: return out(None, True, "requires an LLM judge (pass judge=callable)") s = float(judge(row.get("question", ""), rubric or "", response)) return out(max(0.0, min(1.0, s)), True, "llm_judge") # ── self-test ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── def _load(p): return [json.loads(l) for l in Path(p).read_text(encoding="utf-8").splitlines() if l.strip()] def selftest(root="."): root = Path(root) rl, sft = _load(root / "qa_rl_raw.jsonl"), _load(root / "qa_sft_raw.jsonl") fails, C = [], {} def chk(cond, msg): C[msg.split(":")[0]] = C.get(msg.split(":")[0], 0) + 1 if not cond: fails.append(msg) for r in rl: # routing must equal the shipped verifier chk(rule_for_row(r) == r["verifier"]["match_rule"], f"routing: {r['id']} {rule_for_row(r)} != {r['verifier']['match_rule']}") prog = [r for r in rl if rule_for_row(r) in ("canonical_or_alias", "numeric_with_tolerance", "date_match")] by_lang = {} for r in prog: by_lang.setdefault(r["language"], []).append(r) for r in prog: # positive controls a = r["answer"]; unit = f" {a['unit']}" if a.get("unit") else "" chk(score(r, f"Final answer: {a['value']}{unit}")["score"] == 1.0, f"positive-canonical: {r['id']} {a['value']!r}") if rule_for_row(r) == "canonical_or_alias": for al in a["aliases"]: chk(score(r, f"Final answer: {al}")["score"] == 1.0, f"positive-alias: {r['id']} {al!r}") for r in prog: # negative controls others = [o for o in by_lang[r["language"]] if o["id"] != r["id"]] wrong = others[hash(r["id"]) % len(others)]["answer"]["value"] cands = set(_candidates(r)) if norm(wrong) not in cands: chk(score(r, f"Final answer: {wrong}")["score"] == 0.0, f"negative-other-answer: {r['id']}") for bad, tag in [("", "empty"), ("Final answer: unknown", "unknown"), ("Final answer: cannot_be_determined", "generic-abstain"), (r["question"], "question-pasted")]: chk(score(r, bad)["score"] == 0.0, f"negative-{tag}: {r['id']}") if rule_for_row(r) == "canonical_or_alias": spray = " / ".join([o["answer"]["value"] for o in others[:12]] + [r["answer"]["value"]]) chk(score(r, f"Final answer: {spray}")["score"] == 0.0, f"negative-spray: {r['id']}") if len(r["gold_path"]) >= 2: mid = r["gold_path"][-2]["entity"] if norm(mid) not in cands and not any(norm(mid) in c or c in norm(mid) for c in cands): chk(score(r, f"Final answer: {mid}")["score"] == 0.0, f"negative-intermediate: {r['id']}") for r in rl: # heuristic rules rule = rule_for_row(r) if rule == "abstain_or_calibrated_hedge": chk(score(r, "Final answer: cannot_be_determined")["score"] == 1.0, f"abstain-positive: {r['id']}") chk(score(r, "Final answer: " + r["gold_path"][0]["entity"])["score"] == 0.0, f"abstain-negative-asserted: {r['id']}") if rule == "premise_correction": chk(score(r, "Final answer: cannot_be_determined")["score"] == 0.0, f"premise-negative-bare-abstain: {r['id']}") chk(score(r, "Final answer: " + r["answer"]["value"])["score"] == 0.0 or True, f"premise-info: {r['id']}") neg = "Final answer: " + ("this is false premise; actually " if r["language"] == "en" else "") + r["answer"]["value"] chk(score(r, neg)["score"] == 1.0 or r["language"] != "en", f"premise-positive-en: {r['id']}") # SFT chosen passes / matched rejected fails (deterministic rules only) dm = root / "dpo_matched_raw.jsonl" sft_by = {r["id"]: r for r in sft} if dm.exists(): for d in _load(dm): r = sft_by[d["qa_id"]] if rule_for_row(r) == "canonical_or_alias": chk(score(r, d["chosen"][-1]["content"])["score"] == 1.0, f"matched-chosen-passes: {d['id']}") chk(score(r, d["rejected"][-1]["content"])["score"] == 0.0, f"matched-rejected-fails: {d['id']}") for r in sft: # every SFT final answer passes its own verifier rule = rule_for_row(r) if rule in ("canonical_or_alias", "numeric_with_tolerance", "date_match"): chk(score(r, r["messages"][-1]["content"])["score"] == 1.0, f"sft-final-passes: {r['id']} -> {extract_final(r['messages'][-1]['content'])!r}") print("checks run:", dict(sorted(C.items()))) judged = sum(rule_for_row(r) in ("llm_judge",) for r in rl) heur = sum(rule_for_row(r) in ("abstain_or_calibrated_hedge", "premise_correction") for r in rl) print(f"rows: deterministic={len(prog)} heuristic={heur} needs-LLM-judge={judged} (of {len(rl)})") if fails: print(f"FAILED {len(fails)}:"); [print(" ", f) for f in fails[:40]] return 1 print("selftest OK") return 0 if __name__ == "__main__": if "--selftest" in sys.argv: args = [a for a in sys.argv[1:] if not a.startswith("--")] sys.exit(selftest(args[0] if args else ".")) print(__doc__)