import Mathlib namespace OAI noncomputable section universe u open Set open scoped ENNReal Classical namespace BoundedTreePotentials section TestNorms variable {I : Type*} structure TestFamily (I : Type*) where carrier : Set (I → ℝ) zero_mem : (0 : I → ℝ) ∈ carrier neg_mem : ∀ f ∈ carrier, -f ∈ carrier coeff_bound : ∀ f ∈ carrier, ∀ i, |f i| ≤ 1 singleton_mem : ∀ i, (fun j => if j = i then (1 : ℝ) else 0) ∈ carrier instance : CoeSort (TestFamily I) (Type _) := ⟨fun K => K.carrier⟩ instance (K : TestFamily I) : Nonempty K.carrier := ⟨⟨0, K.zero_mem⟩⟩ def finitePairing (f : I → ℝ) : (I →₀ ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ := Finsupp.linearCombination ℝ f def testNorm (K : TestFamily I) (x : I →₀ ℝ) : ℝ := ⨆ f : K, |finitePairing f.val x| def testSeminorm (K : TestFamily I) : Seminorm ℝ (I →₀ ℝ) := by have finitePairing_apply (f : I → ℝ) (x : I →₀ ℝ) : finitePairing f x = ∑ i ∈ x.support, x i * f i := rfl have finitePairing_abs_bound (K : TestFamily I) (f : K) (x : I →₀ ℝ) : |finitePairing f.val x| ≤ ∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i| := by rw [finitePairing_apply] calc |∑ i ∈ x.support, x i * f.val i| ≤ ∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i * f.val i| := Finset.abs_sum_le_sum_abs _ _ _ ≤ ∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i| := by apply Finset.sum_le_sum intro i hi rw [abs_mul] exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (abs_nonneg _) (K.coeff_bound _ f.property i) have testNorm_bddAbove (K : TestFamily I) (x : I →₀ ℝ) : BddAbove (range fun f : K => |finitePairing f.val x|) := ⟨∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i|, by rintro _ ⟨f, rfl⟩; exact finitePairing_abs_bound K f x⟩ have finitePairing_le_testNorm (K : TestFamily I) (f : K) (x : I →₀ ℝ) : |finitePairing f.val x| ≤ testNorm K x := le_ciSup (testNorm_bddAbove K x) f have testNorm_nonneg (K : TestFamily I) (x : I →₀ ℝ) : 0 ≤ testNorm K x := (abs_nonneg _).trans (finitePairing_le_testNorm K ⟨0, K.zero_mem⟩ x) have testNorm_le_l1 (K : TestFamily I) (x : I →₀ ℝ) : testNorm K x ≤ ∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i| := by apply ciSup_le exact fun f => finitePairing_abs_bound K f x have testNorm_zero (K : TestFamily I) : testNorm K 0 = 0 := by apply le_antisymm · simpa using testNorm_le_l1 K 0 · exact testNorm_nonneg K 0 have testNorm_add_le (K : TestFamily I) (x y : I →₀ ℝ) : testNorm K (x + y) ≤ testNorm K x + testNorm K y := by apply ciSup_le intro f rw [map_add] exact (abs_add_le _ _).trans (add_le_add (finitePairing_le_testNorm K f x) (finitePairing_le_testNorm K f y)) have testNorm_smul_le (K : TestFamily I) (a : ℝ) (x : I →₀ ℝ) : testNorm K (a • x) ≤ ‖a‖ * testNorm K x := by apply ciSup_le intro f rw [map_smul, smul_eq_mul, abs_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs] exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (finitePairing_le_testNorm K f x) (abs_nonneg a) exact Seminorm.ofSMulLE (testNorm K) (testNorm_zero K) (testNorm_add_le K) (testNorm_smul_le K) def TestVector (_ : TestFamily I) := I →₀ ℝ instance (K : TestFamily I) : AddCommGroup (TestVector K) := inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (I →₀ ℝ)) instance (K : TestFamily I) : Module ℝ (TestVector K) := inferInstanceAs (Module ℝ (I →₀ ℝ)) instance (K : TestFamily I) : Norm (TestVector K) := ⟨testNorm K⟩ instance (K : TestFamily I) : NormedAddCommGroup (TestVector K) := by have finitePairing_apply (f : I → ℝ) (x : I →₀ ℝ) : finitePairing f x = ∑ i ∈ x.support, x i * f i := rfl have finitePairing_abs_bound (K : TestFamily I) (f : K) (x : I →₀ ℝ) : |finitePairing f.val x| ≤ ∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i| := by rw [finitePairing_apply] calc |∑ i ∈ x.support, x i * f.val i| ≤ ∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i * f.val i| := Finset.abs_sum_le_sum_abs _ _ _ ≤ ∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i| := by apply Finset.sum_le_sum intro i hi rw [abs_mul] exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (abs_nonneg _) (K.coeff_bound _ f.property i) have testNorm_bddAbove (K : TestFamily I) (x : I →₀ ℝ) : BddAbove (range fun f : K => |finitePairing f.val x|) := ⟨∑ i ∈ x.support, |x i|, by rintro _ ⟨f, rfl⟩; exact finitePairing_abs_bound K f x⟩ have finitePairing_le_testNorm (K : TestFamily I) (f : K) (x : I →₀ ℝ) : |finitePairing f.val x| ≤ testNorm K x := le_ciSup (testNorm_bddAbove K x) f have finitePairing_single_test (x : I →₀ ℝ) (i : I) : finitePairing (fun j => if j = i then (1 : ℝ) else 0) x = x i := by classical rw [finitePairing_apply] simp only [mul_ite, mul_one, mul_zero] by_cases hi : i ∈ x.support · simp [hi] · simp [hi, Finsupp.notMem_support_iff.mp hi] have coordinate_le_testNorm (K : TestFamily I) (x : I →₀ ℝ) (i : I) : |x i| ≤ testNorm K x := by convert finitePairing_le_testNorm K ⟨_, K.singleton_mem i⟩ x using 1 rw [finitePairing_single_test] exact NormedAddCommGroup.ofCore (𝕜 := ℝ) { norm_nonneg := apply_nonneg (testSeminorm K) norm_smul := map_smul_eq_mul (testSeminorm K) norm_triangle := map_add_le_add (testSeminorm K) norm_eq_zero_iff := fun x => ⟨by intro h apply Finsupp.ext intro i exact abs_nonpos_iff.mp (h ▸ coordinate_le_testNorm K x i), by rintro rfl exact map_zero (testSeminorm K)⟩ } instance (K : TestFamily I) : NormedSpace ℝ (TestVector K) where norm_smul_le a x := le_of_eq (map_smul_eq_mul (testSeminorm K) a x) abbrev TestCompletion (K : TestFamily I) := UniformSpace.Completion (TestVector K) end TestNorms namespace TreeCalculus abbrev Node := List ℕ def potential (f : Node → ℝ) (s : Node) : ℝ := (s.inits.map f).sum inductive QuadraticKind where | sibling | antichain | global deriving DecidableEq def QuadraticGroup : QuadraticKind → Finset Node → Prop | .sibling, B => ∃ r, ∀ s ∈ B, ∃ j, s = r ++ [j] | .antichain, B => (B : Set Node).Pairwise (fun s t => ¬s <+: t ∧ ¬t <+: s) | .global, _ => True def QuadraticBudget (k : QuadraticKind) (f : Node → ℝ) : Prop := ∀ B : Finset Node, QuadraticGroup k B → ∑ s ∈ B, f s ^ 2 ≤ 1 def CoefficientSupport : QuadraticKind → (Node → ℝ) → Prop | .sibling, _ => True | .antichain, f => (Function.support f).Finite | .global, f => Memℓp f 2 structure IsTreeTest (includeRoot : Bool) (k : QuadraticKind) (f : Node → ℝ) : Prop where root_zero : includeRoot = false → f [] = 0 potential_bound : ∀ s, |potential f s| ≤ 1 quadratic_budget : QuadraticBudget k f coefficient_support : CoefficientSupport k f abbrev TreeCoordinate (includeRoot : Bool) := {s : Node // includeRoot = true ∨ s ≠ []} def liftCoefficients (r : Bool) (f : TreeCoordinate r → ℝ) (s : Node) : ℝ := if h : r = true ∨ s ≠ [] then f ⟨s, h⟩ else 0 def treeTestFamily (r : Bool) (k : QuadraticKind) : TestFamily (TreeCoordinate r) := by have potential_root (f : Node → ℝ) : potential f [] = f [] := by simp [potential] have potential_child (f : Node → ℝ) (s : Node) (j : ℕ) : potential f (s ++ [j]) = potential f s + f (s ++ [j]) := by simp [potential, List.inits_append] have potential_smul (a : ℝ) (f : Node → ℝ) (s : Node) : potential (a • f) s = a * potential f s := by induction s using List.reverseRecOn with | nil => simp [potential_root] | append_singleton s j ih => simp only [potential_child, ih, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]; ring have quadratic_singleton (k : QuadraticKind) {s : Node} (hs : s ≠ []) : QuadraticGroup k {s} := by cases k with | sibling => cases s using List.reverseRecOn with | nil => exact (hs rfl).elim | append_singleton s j => refine ⟨s, ?_⟩ intro t ht have ht' : t = s ++ [j] := by simpa using ht exact ⟨j, ht'⟩ | antichain => simp [QuadraticGroup] | global => trivial have test_coefficient_bound {r : Bool} {k : QuadraticKind} {f : Node → ℝ} (hf : IsTreeTest r k f) (s : Node) : |f s| ≤ 1 := by by_cases hs : s = [] · subst s; simpa only [potential_root] using hf.potential_bound [] · have h := hf.quadratic_budget {s} (quadratic_singleton k hs) rw [Finset.sum_singleton] at h exact (sq_le_one_iff_abs_le_one (f s)).mp h have quadraticBudget_dominate {k : QuadraticKind} {f g : Node → ℝ} (hf : QuadraticBudget k f) (h : ∀ s, |g s| ≤ |f s|) : QuadraticBudget k g := by intro B hB apply le_trans _ (hf B hB) apply Finset.sum_le_sum intro s hs exact (sq_le_sq).mpr (h s) have coefficientSupport_dominate {k : QuadraticKind} {f g : Node → ℝ} (hf : CoefficientSupport k f) (h : ∀ s, |g s| ≤ |f s|) : CoefficientSupport k g := by cases k with | sibling => trivial | antichain => apply hf.subset intro s hs change g s ≠ 0 at hs change f s ≠ 0 intro hzero have hh := h s rw [hzero, abs_zero] at hh exact hs (abs_nonpos_iff.mp hh) | global => exact (hf.norm).mono (by intro s; simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs] using h s) have zero_isTreeTest (r : Bool) (k : QuadraticKind) : IsTreeTest r k 0 := by constructor · simp · intro s change |(s.inits.map fun _ => (0 : ℝ)).sum| ≤ 1 simp · intro B hB; simp · cases k with | sibling => trivial | antichain => simp [CoefficientSupport] | global => exact zero_memℓp have neg_isTreeTest {r : Bool} {k : QuadraticKind} {f : Node → ℝ} (hf : IsTreeTest r k f) : IsTreeTest r k (-f) := by constructor · intro hr; simpa using congrArg Neg.neg (hf.root_zero hr) · intro s have he : -f = (-1 : ℝ) • f := by ext s; simp rw [he, potential_smul, neg_one_mul, abs_neg] exact hf.potential_bound s · exact quadraticBudget_dominate hf.quadratic_budget (by intro s; simp) · exact coefficientSupport_dominate hf.coefficient_support (by intro s; simp) have inits_nodup (s : Node) : s.inits.Nodup := by induction s using List.reverseRecOn with | nil => simp | append_singleton s j ih => have he : (s ++ [j]).inits = s.inits ++ [s ++ [j]] := by simp [List.inits_append] rw [he, List.nodup_append] refine ⟨ih, by simp, ?_⟩ intro a ha b hb hab have hb' : b = s ++ [j] := by simpa using hb have hp := ((List.mem_inits a s).mp ha).length_le rw [hab, hb', List.length_append, List.length_singleton] at hp exact Nat.not_succ_le_self _ hp have potential_single (i s : Node) : potential (Pi.single i (1 : ℝ)) s = if i <+: s then 1 else 0 := by rw [potential, ← List.sum_toFinset _ (inits_nodup s)] simp only [Pi.single_apply] by_cases h : i <+: s · have hm : i ∈ s.inits.toFinset := List.mem_toFinset.mpr ((List.mem_inits i s).mpr h) simp [hm, h] · have hm : i ∉ s.inits.toFinset := fun hm => h ((List.mem_inits i s).mp (List.mem_toFinset.mp hm)) simp [hm, h] have single_isTreeTest (r : Bool) (k : QuadraticKind) {i : Node} (hi : r = true ∨ i ≠ []) : IsTreeTest r k (Pi.single i (1 : ℝ)) := by constructor · intro hr have hn : [] ≠ i := by rcases hi with hi | hi · simp_all · exact Ne.symm hi exact Pi.single_eq_of_ne hn _ · intro s rw [potential_single] split_ifs <;> norm_num · intro B hB simp only [Pi.single_apply, ite_pow, one_pow, zero_pow (by decide : (2 : ℕ) ≠ 0)] by_cases h : i ∈ B <;> simp [h] · cases k with | sibling => trivial | antichain => change (Function.support (Pi.single i (1 : ℝ))).Finite exact (Set.finite_singleton i).subset (by intro s hs; simpa [Function.mem_support, Pi.single_apply] using hs) | global => exact (lp.single (E := fun _ : Node => ℝ) 2 i (1 : ℝ)).property have liftCoefficients_coord {r : Bool} (f : TreeCoordinate r → ℝ) (s : TreeCoordinate r) : liftCoefficients r f s.val = f s := by simp [liftCoefficients, s.property] have liftCoefficients_zero (r : Bool) : liftCoefficients r 0 = 0 := by ext s; simp [liftCoefficients] have liftCoefficients_neg (r : Bool) (f : TreeCoordinate r → ℝ) : liftCoefficients r (-f) = -liftCoefficients r f := by ext s by_cases h : r = true ∨ s ≠ [] <;> simp [liftCoefficients, h] exact { carrier := {f | IsTreeTest r k (liftCoefficients r f)} zero_mem := by change IsTreeTest r k (liftCoefficients r 0) rw [liftCoefficients_zero] exact zero_isTreeTest r k neg_mem := by intro f hf change IsTreeTest r k (liftCoefficients r (-f)) rw [liftCoefficients_neg] exact neg_isTreeTest hf coeff_bound := by intro f hf i simpa only [liftCoefficients_coord] using test_coefficient_bound hf i.val singleton_mem := by rintro ⟨i, hi⟩ change IsTreeTest r k (liftCoefficients r _) convert single_isTreeTest r k hi using 1 ext s by_cases h : r = true ∨ s ≠ [] · simp [liftCoefficients, h, Pi.single_apply, Subtype.mk.injEq] · have hn : s ≠ i := by rintro rfl; exact h hi simp [liftCoefficients, h, hn] } end TreeCalculus section AsymptoticModuli variable (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] structure ClosedFiniteCodim where space : Submodule ℝ E closed : IsClosed (space : Set E) finiteCodim : Module.Finite ℝ (E ⧸ space) def averagedModulusReal (t : ℝ) : ℝ := ⨅ x : {x : E // ‖x‖=1},⨆ F : ClosedFiniteCodim E, ⨅ y : {y : E // y ∈ F.space ∧ 1≤‖y‖}, (‖x.val+t • y.val‖+‖x.val-t • y.val‖)/((2 : ℕ) : ℝ)-1 def oneSidedModulusReal (t : ℝ) : ℝ := ⨅ x : {x : E // ‖x‖=1},⨆ F : ClosedFiniteCodim E, ⨅ y : {y : E // y ∈ F.space ∧ ‖y‖=1},‖x.val+t • y.val‖-1 def IsAUCReal : Prop := ∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t → 0 < oneSidedModulusReal E t end AsymptoticModuli open TreeCalculus in theorem TreeCalculus.main_counterexample (r : Bool) (k : QuadraticKind) : (CompleteSpace (TestCompletion (treeTestFamily r k)) ∧ TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace (TestCompletion (treeTestFamily r k)) ∧ ¬Module.Finite ℝ (TestCompletion (treeTestFamily r k))) ∧ (∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t → t < 1 → Real.sqrt (1 + t ^ 2 / 4) - 1 ≤ averagedModulusReal (TestCompletion (treeTestFamily r k)) t) ∧ (∀ (Y : Type u) [NormedAddCommGroup Y] [NormedSpace ℝ Y], (TestCompletion (treeTestFamily r k) ≃L[ℝ] Y) → ¬IsAUCReal Y) := by sorry end BoundedTreePotentials end end OAI