+
+## **Copyright Notification**
+
+No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.
+The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
+
+©2022, 3GPP Organizational Partners (ARIB, ATIS, CCSA, ETSI, TSDSI, TTA, TTC).
+All rights reserved.
+
+UMTS™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its members
+3GPP™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
+LTE™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
+GSM® and the GSM logo are registered and owned by the GSM Association
+
+# --- Contents
+
+| | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| Foreword..... | 18 |
+| Introduction..... | 18 |
+| 1 Scope..... | 20 |
+| 2 References..... | 20 |
+| 3 Definitions, and abbreviations..... | 21 |
+| 3.1 Definitions..... | 21 |
+| 3.2 Abbreviations..... | 22 |
+| 4 Overview..... | 22 |
+| 5 Basic functionality use cases..... | 24 |
+| 5.1 Introduction..... | 24 |
+| 5.2 Device power on and shut-down related use cases..... | 25 |
+| 5.3 Use case: Power on the UE..... | 25 |
+| 5.3.1 Description..... | 25 |
+| 5.3.2 Pre-conditions..... | 25 |
+| 5.3.3 Service flows..... | 25 |
+| 5.3.4 Post-conditions..... | 25 |
+| 5.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 26 |
+| 5.4 Use case: Access to the FRMCS System to activate the FRMCS Equipment..... | 26 |
+| 5.4.1 Description..... | 26 |
+| 5.4.2 Pre-conditions..... | 26 |
+| 5.4.3 Service flows..... | 26 |
+| 5.4.4 Post-conditions..... | 26 |
+| 5.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 26 |
+| 5.5 Use case: Controlled power down of UE..... | 26 |
+| 5.5.1 Description..... | 26 |
+| 5.5.2 Pre-conditions..... | 26 |
+
+| | | |
+|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 5.5.3 | Service flows..... | 27 |
+| 5.5.4 | Post-conditions..... | 27 |
+| 5.5.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 27 |
+| 5.6 | Use case: Uncontrolled power down UE..... | 27 |
+| 5.6.1 | Description..... | 27 |
+| 5.6.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 27 |
+| 5.6.3 | Service flows..... | 27 |
+| 5.6.4 | Post-conditions..... | 27 |
+| 5.6.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 28 |
+| 6 | Critical communication applications related use cases..... | 28 |
+| 6.1 | Introduction..... | 28 |
+| 6.2 | Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s)..... | 28 |
+| 6.2.1 | Introduction..... | 28 |
+| 6.2.2 | Use case: Initiation of Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) communication..... | 28 |
+| 6.2.2.1 | Description..... | 28 |
+| 6.2.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 28 |
+| 6.2.2.3 | Service flows..... | 29 |
+| 6.2.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 29 |
+| 6.2.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 30 |
+| 6.2.3 | Use case: Termination of Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) communication..... | 31 |
+| 6.2.3.1 | Description..... | 31 |
+| 6.2.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 31 |
+| 6.2.3.3 | Service flows..... | 31 |
+| 6.2.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 32 |
+| 6.2.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 33 |
+| 6.2.4 | Use case: Service Interworking and service continuation between GSM-R and FRMCS for Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) communication..... | 34 |
+| 6.2.4.1 | Description..... | 34 |
+| 6.2.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 34 |
+
+| | | |
+|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 6.2.4.3 | Service flows..... | 34 |
+| 6.2.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 35 |
+| 6.2.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 36 |
+| 6.3 | On-train outgoing voice communication from the Driver towards the Controller(s) of the train..... | 37 |
+| 6.3.1 | Introduction..... | 37 |
+| 6.3.2 | Use case: Initiation of Driver to Controller(s) voice communication..... | 37 |
+| 6.3.2.1 | Description..... | 37 |
+| 6.3.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 37 |
+| 6.3.2.3 | Service flows..... | 37 |
+| 6.3.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 38 |
+| 6.3.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 39 |
+| 6.3.3 | Use case: Termination of Driver to Controller(s) voice communication..... | 40 |
+| 6.3.3.1 | Description..... | 40 |
+| 6.3.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 41 |
+| 6.3.3.3 | Service flows..... | 41 |
+| 6.3.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 41 |
+| 6.3.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 42 |
+| 6.3.4 | Use case: Service Interworking and service continuation between GSM-R and FRMCS of Driver to Controller(s) voice communication..... | 42 |
+| 6.3.4.1 | Description..... | 42 |
+| 6.3.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 43 |
+| 6.3.4.3 | Service flows..... | 43 |
+| 6.3.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 43 |
+| 6.3.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 44 |
+| 6.4 | Railway emergency communication..... | 45 |
+| 6.4.1 | Introduction..... | 45 |
+| 6.4.2 | General overview..... | 45 |
+| 6.4.3 | Use case: Initiation of the railway emergency alert..... | 47 |
+| 6.4.3.1 | Description..... | 47 |
+| 6.4.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 47 |
+| 6.4.3.3 | Service flows..... | 47 |
+
+| | | |
+|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 6.4.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 48 |
+| 6.4.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 49 |
+| 6.4.4 | Use case: New entry to the railway emergency alert..... | 50 |
+| 6.4.4.1 | Description..... | 50 |
+| 6.4.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 50 |
+| 6.4.4.3 | Service flows..... | 50 |
+| 6.4.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 51 |
+| 6.4.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 52 |
+| 6.4.5 | Use case: Changing of the railway emergency alert..... | 52 |
+| 6.4.5.1 | Description..... | 53 |
+| 6.4.5.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 53 |
+| 6.4.5.3 | Service flows..... | 53 |
+| 6.4.5.4 | Post-conditions..... | 53 |
+| 6.4.5.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 54 |
+| 6.4.5a | Use case: Merging of Railway Emergency Alerts..... | 55 |
+| 6.4.5a.1 | Description..... | 55 |
+| 6.4.5a.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 55 |
+| 6.4.5a.3 | Service flows..... | 55 |
+| 6.4.5a.4 | Post-conditions..... | 56 |
+| 6.4.5a.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 56 |
+| 6.4.6 | Use case: Leaving of the railway emergency alert..... | 56 |
+| 6.4.6.1 | Description..... | 56 |
+| 6.4.6.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 56 |
+| 6.4.6.3 | Service flows..... | 56 |
+| 6.4.6.4 | Post-conditions..... | 57 |
+| 6.4.6.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 57 |
+| 6.4.7 | Use case: Termination of the railway emergency alert..... | 57 |
+| 6.4.7.1 | Description..... | 57 |
+| 6.4.7.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 57 |
+| 6.4.7.3 | Service flows..... | 57 |
+
+| | | |
+|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 6.4.7.4 | Post-conditions..... | 58 |
+| 6.4.7.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 58 |
+| 6.4.8 | Use case: Initiation of railway emergency voice communication..... | 58 |
+| 6.4.8.1 | Description..... | 58 |
+| 6.4.8.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 58 |
+| 6.4.8.3 | Service flows..... | 58 |
+| 6.4.8.4 | Post-conditions..... | 59 |
+| 6.4.8.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 60 |
+| 6.4.9 | Use case: Termination of railway emergency voice communication..... | 61 |
+| 6.4.9.1 | Description..... | 61 |
+| 6.4.9.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 61 |
+| 6.4.9.3 | Service flows..... | 61 |
+| 6.4.9.4 | Post-conditions..... | 61 |
+| 6.4.9.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 62 |
+| 6.4.10 | Use case: Initiation of Data communication during railway emergency alert..... | 62 |
+| 6.4.10.1 | Description..... | 62 |
+| 6.4.10.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 62 |
+| 6.4.10.3 | Service flows..... | 62 |
+| 6.4.10.4 | Post-conditions..... | 63 |
+| 6.4.10.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 63 |
+| 6.4.9.10 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 64 |
+| 6.4.11 | Use case: Service interworking and service continuation with GSM-R..... | 64 |
+| 6.4.11.1 | Description..... | 64 |
+| 6.4.11.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 64 |
+| 6.4.11.3 | Service flows..... | 65 |
+| 6.4.11.4 | Post-conditions..... | 66 |
+| 6.4.11.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 67 |
+| 6.4.12 | Use case: Interface to train borne recorder..... | 69 |
+| 6.4.12.1 | Description..... | 69 |
+| 6.4.12.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 69 |
+
+| | | |
+|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 6.4.12.3 | Service flows..... | 69 |
+| 6.4.12.4 | Post-conditions..... | 69 |
+| 6.4.12.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 70 |
+| 6.5 | Use case: Automatic Train Protection (ATP) support by the FRMCS System..... | 70 |
+| 6.5.1 | Description..... | 70 |
+| 6.5.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 70 |
+| 6.5.3 | Service flows..... | 70 |
+| 6.5.4 | Post-conditions..... | 70 |
+| 6.5.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 71 |
+| 6.6 | Trackside Maintenance Warning System communication related use cases..... | 71 |
+| 6.6.1 | Introduction..... | 71 |
+| 6.6.2 | Use case: Initiation of a trackside maintenance warning system communication..... | 71 |
+| 6.6.2.1 | Description..... | 71 |
+| 6.6.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 72 |
+| 6.6.2.3 | Service flows..... | 72 |
+| 6.6.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 72 |
+| 6.6.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 72 |
+| 6.6.3 | Use case: Termination of a trackside maintenance warning system communication..... | 72 |
+| 6.6.3.1 | Description..... | 72 |
+| 6.6.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 72 |
+| 6.6.3.3 | Service flows..... | 73 |
+| 6.6.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 73 |
+| 6.6.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 73 |
+| 6.7 | Pushed Real Time Video streaming..... | 73 |
+| 6.7.1 | Introduction..... | 73 |
+| 6.7.2 | Description..... | 73 |
+| 6.7.3 | Use case: Initiation of a real time video streaming..... | 73 |
+| 6.7.3.1 | Description..... | 73 |
+| 6.7.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 73 |
+| 6.7.3.3 | Service flows..... | 74 |
+
+| | | |
+|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 6.7.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 74 |
+| 6.7.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 75 |
+| 6.7.4 | Use case: Termination of a real time video communication..... | 75 |
+| 6.7.4.1 | Description..... | 75 |
+| 6.7.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 75 |
+| 6.7.4.3 | Service flows..... | 75 |
+| 6.7.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 75 |
+| 6.7.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 75 |
+| 6.8 | Public emergency call related use cases..... | 75 |
+| 6.8.1 | Introduction..... | 75 |
+| 6.8.2 | Use case: Initiation of a public emergency call..... | 76 |
+| 6.8.2.1 | Description..... | 76 |
+| 6.8.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 76 |
+| 6.8.2.3 | Service flows..... | 76 |
+| 6.8.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 76 |
+| 6.8.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 76 |
+| 6.8.3 | Use case: Termination of a public emergency call..... | 76 |
+| 6.8.3.1 | Description..... | 76 |
+| 6.8.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 77 |
+| 6.8.3.3 | Service flows..... | 77 |
+| 6.8.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 77 |
+| 6.8.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 77 |
+| 6.8.4 | Use case: Call back the public emergency call initiator..... | 77 |
+| 6.8.4.1 | Description..... | 77 |
+| 6.8.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 77 |
+| 6.8.4.3 | Service flows..... | 77 |
+| 6.8.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 78 |
+| 6.8.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 78 |
+| 6.9 | Data communication for possession management related use cases..... | 78 |
+| 6.9.1 | Introduction..... | 78 |
+
+| | | |
+|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 6.9.2 | Use case: Initiation of a possession management data communication..... | 78 |
+| 6.9.2.1 | Description..... | 78 |
+| 6.9.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 78 |
+| 6.9.2.3 | Service flows..... | 78 |
+| 6.9.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 78 |
+| 6.9.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 79 |
+| 6.10 | Recording of communication..... | 80 |
+| 6.10.1 | Introduction..... | 80 |
+| 6.10.2 | Use case: Recording..... | 80 |
+| 6.10.2.1 | Description..... | 80 |
+| 6.10.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 80 |
+| 6.10.2.3 | Service flows..... | 80 |
+| 6.10.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 80 |
+| 6.10.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 80 |
+| 6.11 | Remote control of engines communication related use cases..... | 81 |
+| 6.11.1 | Introduction..... | 81 |
+| 6.11.2 | Use case: Initiation/termination of a remote control of engines communication..... | 81 |
+| 6.11.2.1 | Description..... | 81 |
+| 6.11.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 81 |
+| 6.11.2.3 | Service flows..... | 81 |
+| 6.11.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 81 |
+| 6.11.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 82 |
+| 6.12 | Automatic Train Operation data communication..... | 82 |
+| 6.12.1 | Introduction..... | 82 |
+| 6.12.2 | Description..... | 82 |
+| 6.12.3 | Use case: Initiation of an Automatic Train Operation data communication..... | 83 |
+| 6.12.3.1 | Description..... | 83 |
+| 6.12.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 83 |
+| 6.12.3.3 | Service flows..... | 83 |
+| 6.12.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 83 |
+
+| | | |
+|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 6.12.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 83 |
+| 6.13 | Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure related use cases..... | 83 |
+| 6.13.1 | Introduction..... | 83 |
+| 6.13.2 | Use case: Initiation of a Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communication..... | 84 |
+| 6.13.2.1 | Description..... | 84 |
+| 6.13.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 84 |
+| 6.13.2.3 | Service flows..... | 84 |
+| 6.13.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 84 |
+| 6.13.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 85 |
+| 6.13.3 | Use case: Termination of a Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communication..... | 85 |
+| 6.13.3.1 | Description..... | 85 |
+| 6.13.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 85 |
+| 6.13.3.3 | Service flows..... | 85 |
+| 6.13.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 85 |
+| 6.13.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 86 |
+| 6.14 | Use case: Data transmission in real time..... | 86 |
+| 6.14.1 | Description..... | 86 |
+| 6.14.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 86 |
+| 6.14.3 | Service flows..... | 86 |
+| 6.14.4 | Post-conditions..... | 86 |
+| 6.14.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 87 |
+| 6.15 | On-train incoming voice or video communication from the Controller(s) of the train towards the drivers.... | 87 |
+| 6.15.1 | Introduction..... | 87 |
+| 6.15.2 | Use case: Initiation of On-train incoming voice or video communication from the Controller(s) of the train towards the drivers..... | 88 |
+| 6.15.2.1 | Description..... | 88 |
+| 6.15.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 88 |
+| 6.15.2.3 | Service Flows..... | 88 |
+| 6.15.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 88 |
+| 6.15.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 89 |
+
+| | | |
+|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 6.15.3 | Use case: Termination of On-train incoming voice or video communication from the Controller(s) of the train towards the drivers..... | 89 |
+| 6.15.3.1 | Description..... | 89 |
+| 6.15.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 89 |
+| 6.15.3.3 | Service Flows..... | 89 |
+| 6.15.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 89 |
+| 6.15.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 89 |
+| 6.16 | Use cases on data communication for Train Operation System Communication..... | 90 |
+| 6.16.1 | Introduction..... | 90 |
+| 6.16.2 | Use case: Train dispatch order data communication between controller and driver..... | 90 |
+| 6.16.2.1 | Description..... | 90 |
+| 6.16.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 90 |
+| 6.16.2.3 | Service flows..... | 90 |
+| 6.16.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 90 |
+| 6.16.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 90 |
+| 6.16.3 | Use case: LOCOTROL information transmission between leading engine and subordinate engine on a multi-headed locomotive..... | 91 |
+| 6.16.3.1 | Description..... | 91 |
+| 6.16.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 91 |
+| 6.16.3.3 | Service flows..... | 91 |
+| 6.16.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 91 |
+| 6.16.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 91 |
+| 6.16.4 | Use case: data communication for security between two approaching trains..... | 91 |
+| 6.16.4.1 | Description..... | 91 |
+| 6.16.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 91 |
+| 6.16.4.3 | Service flows..... | 92 |
+| 6.16.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 92 |
+| 6.16.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 92 |
+| 6.17 | On-train safety device to ground communication..... | 92 |
+| 6.17.1 | Introduction..... | 92 |
+| 6.17.2 | Use case: Initiation of safety device to ground data communication..... | 92 |
+
+| | | |
+|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 6.17.2.1 | Description..... | 92 |
+| 6.17.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 93 |
+| 6.17.2.3 | Service flows..... | 93 |
+| 6.17.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 93 |
+| 6.17.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 94 |
+| 6.18 | Train Integrity monitoring data communication..... | 95 |
+| 6.18.1 | Introduction..... | 95 |
+| 6.18.2 | Use case: Data communication for train integrity information exchange..... | 95 |
+| 6.18.2.1 | Description..... | 95 |
+| 6.18.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 95 |
+| 6.18.2.3 | Service flows..... | 95 |
+| 6.18.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 96 |
+| 6.18.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 97 |
+| 6.19 | Use case: Broadcast of public emergency warning information..... | 97 |
+| 6.19.1 | Introduction..... | 97 |
+| 6.19.2 | Description..... | 97 |
+| 6.19.2a | Pre-conditions..... | 98 |
+| 6.19.3 | Service flows..... | 98 |
+| 6.19.4 | Post-conditions..... | 98 |
+| 6.20 | Safety related critical advisory messaging..... | 99 |
+| 6.20.1 | Introduction..... | 99 |
+| 6.20.2 | Use case: Initiation/Termination of safety device to ground data communication..... | 99 |
+| 6.20.2.1 | Description..... | 99 |
+| 6.20.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 99 |
+| 6.20.2.3 | Service flows..... | 99 |
+| 6.20.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 99 |
+| 6.20.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 100 |
+| 6.20.3 | Use case: Service interworking with GSM-R..... | 100 |
+| 6.20.3.1 | Description..... | 100 |
+| 6.20.3.2 | Void..... | 100 |
+
+| | | |
+|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 6.20.3.3 | Void..... | 100 |
+| 6.20.3.4 | Void..... | 100 |
+| 6.20.3.5 | Void..... | 100 |
+| 6.21 | Automatic Train Protection data communication..... | 100 |
+| 6.21.1 | Introduction..... | 100 |
+| 6.21.2 | Description..... | 101 |
+| 6.21.3 | Use case: Initiation of an Automatic Train Protection data communication..... | 101 |
+| 6.21.3.1 | Description..... | 101 |
+| 6.21.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 101 |
+| 6.21.3.3 | Service flows..... | 101 |
+| 6.21.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 101 |
+| 6.21.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 102 |
+| 6.21.4 | Use case: Termination of an Automatic Train Protection data communication..... | 102 |
+| 6.21.4.1 | Description..... | 102 |
+| 6.21.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 102 |
+| 6.21.4.3 | Service flows..... | 102 |
+| 6.21.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 102 |
+| 6.21.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 103 |
+| 6.22 | Voice communication transfer related use cases..... | 103 |
+| 6.22.1 | Introduction..... | 103 |
+| 6.22.2 | Use case: Transfer of an incoming voice communication..... | 103 |
+| 6.22.2.1 | Description..... | 103 |
+| 6.22.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 103 |
+| 6.22.2.3 | Service flows..... | 103 |
+| 6.22.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 104 |
+| 6.22.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 104 |
+| 6.22.3 | Use case: Transfer of an ongoing voice communication..... | 105 |
+| 6.22.3.1 | Description..... | 105 |
+| 6.22.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 105 |
+| 6.22.3.3 | Service flows..... | 105 |
+
+| | | |
+|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 6.22.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 105 |
+| 6.22.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 105 |
+| 6.22.4 | Use case: Service interworking with GSM-R..... | 105 |
+| 6.22.4.1 | Description..... | 105 |
+| 6.22.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 105 |
+| 6.22.4.3 | Service flows..... | 106 |
+| 6.22.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 106 |
+| 6.22.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 106 |
+| 7 | Performance communication applications related use cases..... | 106 |
+| 7.1 | Use cases related to transmission of real time video..... | 106 |
+| 7.1.1 | Introduction..... | 106 |
+| 7.1.2 | Use Case: An FRMCS User requesting another FRMCS User to transmit real time video..... | 106 |
+| 7.1.2.1 | Description..... | 106 |
+| 7.1.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 106 |
+| 7.1.2.3 | Service flows..... | 107 |
+| 7.1.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 107 |
+| 7.1.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 107 |
+| 7.1.3 | Use Case: An FRMCS User receiving a real time video request to transmit real time video..... | 107 |
+| 7.1.3.1 | Description..... | 107 |
+| 7.1.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 107 |
+| 7.1.3.3 | Service flows..... | 108 |
+| 7.1.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 108 |
+| 7.1.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 108 |
+| 7.1.4 | Use case: An FRMCS User accepting a request to transmit real time video..... | 108 |
+| 7.1.4.1 | Description..... | 108 |
+| 7.1.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 108 |
+| 7.1.4.3 | Service flows..... | 108 |
+| 7.1.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 108 |
+| 7.1.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 109 |
+| 7.1.5 | Use case: An FRMCS User rejecting a request to transmit real time video..... | 109 |
+
+| | | |
+|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 7.1.5.1 | Description..... | 109 |
+| 7.1.5.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 109 |
+| 7.1.5.3 | Service flows..... | 109 |
+| 7.1.5.4 | Post-conditions..... | 109 |
+| 7.1.5.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 110 |
+| 7.1.6 | Use case: An FRMCS User ignoring a request to transmit real time video..... | 110 |
+| 7.1.6.1 | Description..... | 110 |
+| 7.1.6.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 110 |
+| 7.1.6.3 | Service flows..... | 110 |
+| 7.1.6.4 | Post-conditions..... | 110 |
+| 7.1.6.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 110 |
+| 7.2 | Transfer of CCTV archives related use cases..... | 110 |
+| 7.2.1 | Introduction..... | 110 |
+| 7.2.2 | Use Case: Bulk Transfer of CCTV archives from Train to Ground..... | 111 |
+| 7.2.2.1 | Description..... | 111 |
+| 7.2.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 114 |
+| 7.2.2.3 | Service flows..... | 114 |
+| 7.2.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 114 |
+| 7.2.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 115 |
+| 7.3 | Use Case: Massive Inter-carriage data transfer..... | 115 |
+| 7.3.1 | Description..... | 115 |
+| 7.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 115 |
+| 7.3.3 | Service flows..... | 115 |
+| 7.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 115 |
+| 7.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 116 |
+| 7.4 | Void..... | 116 |
+| 7.5 | On-train outgoing voice communication from train staff towards a ground user related use cases..... | 116 |
+| 7.5.1 | Introduction..... | 116 |
+| 7.5.2 | Use case: Initiation of on-train outgoing voice communication from train staff..... | 116 |
+| 7.5.2.1 | Description..... | 116 |
+
+| | | |
+|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 7.5.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 116 |
+| 7.5.2.3 | Service flows..... | 116 |
+| 7.5.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 117 |
+| 7.5.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 118 |
+| 7.5.3 | Use case: Termination of on-train outgoing voice communication from train staff..... | 118 |
+| 7.5.3.1 | Description..... | 118 |
+| 7.5.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 119 |
+| 7.5.3.3 | Service flows..... | 119 |
+| 7.5.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 119 |
+| 7.5.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 120 |
+| 7.5.4 | Use case: Service interworking with GSM-R..... | 121 |
+| 7.5.4.1 | Description..... | 121 |
+| 7.5.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 121 |
+| 7.5.4.3 | Service flows..... | 121 |
+| 7.5.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 121 |
+| 7.5.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 122 |
+| 7.6 | Real-time video communication (video conferencing) related use cases..... | 122 |
+| 7.6.1 | Introduction..... | 122 |
+| 7.6.2 | Use case: Initiation of video conference..... | 123 |
+| 7.6.2.1 | Description..... | 123 |
+| 7.6.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 123 |
+| 7.6.2.3 | Service flows..... | 123 |
+| 7.6.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 123 |
+| 7.6.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 123 |
+| 7.6.3 | Use case: Leave and re-join a video conference..... | 123 |
+| 7.6.3.1 | Description..... | 123 |
+| 7.6.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 124 |
+| 7.6.3.3 | Service flows..... | 124 |
+| 7.6.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 124 |
+| 7.6.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 124 |
+
+| | | |
+|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 7.6.4 | Void..... | 124 |
+| 7.6.5 | Use case: Termination of a video conference..... | 124 |
+| 7.6.5.1 | Description..... | 124 |
+| 7.6.5.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 124 |
+| 7.6.5.3 | Service flows..... | 124 |
+| 7.6.5.4 | Post-conditions..... | 124 |
+| 7.6.5.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 124 |
+| 7.6.6 | Use case: Changes from a video conference to a voice-only conference..... | 125 |
+| 7.6.6.1 | Description..... | 125 |
+| 7.6.6.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 125 |
+| 7.6.6.3 | Service flows..... | 125 |
+| 7.6.6.4 | Post-conditions..... | 125 |
+| 7.6.6.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 125 |
+| 7.6.7 | Use case: Change from a voice-only conference to a video conference..... | 126 |
+| 7.6.7.1 | Description..... | 126 |
+| 7.6.7.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 126 |
+| 7.6.7.3 | Service flows..... | 126 |
+| 7.6.7.4 | Post-conditions..... | 126 |
+| 7.6.7.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 126 |
+| 7.6.8 | Use case: Join an ongoing video conference..... | 127 |
+| 7.6.8.1 | Description..... | 127 |
+| 7.6.8.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 127 |
+| 7.6.8.3 | Service flows..... | 127 |
+| 7.6.8.4 | Post-conditions..... | 127 |
+| 7.6.8.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 127 |
+| 8 | Business communication applications related use cases..... | 127 |
+| 8.1 | Multimedia applications related use cases..... | 127 |
+| 8.1.1 | Introduction..... | 127 |
+| 8.2 | Use Case: Live streaming of multimedia..... | 128 |
+| 8.2.1 | Description..... | 128 |
+
+| | | |
+|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 8.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 128 |
+| 8.2.3 | Service flows..... | 128 |
+| 8.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 128 |
+| 8.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 128 |
+| 8.3 | Use Case: Bulk transfer of multimedia from ground to train..... | 128 |
+| 8.3.1 | Description..... | 128 |
+| 8.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 129 |
+| 8.3.3 | Service flows..... | 129 |
+| 8.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 129 |
+| 8.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 129 |
+| 9 | Critical support applications related use cases..... | 130 |
+| 9.1 | Overview..... | 130 |
+| 9.2 | Assured voice communication (AVC)..... | 130 |
+| 9.2.1 | Introduction..... | 130 |
+| 9.2.2 | Use case: Invocation of Assured Voice Communication..... | 130 |
+| 9.2.2.1 | Description..... | 130 |
+| 9.2.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 130 |
+| 9.2.2.3 | Service flows..... | 130 |
+| 9.2.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 130 |
+| 9.2.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 131 |
+| 9.2.3 | Use case: Stopping Assured Voice Communication..... | 131 |
+| 9.2.3.1 | Description..... | 131 |
+| 9.2.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 131 |
+| 9.2.3.3 | Service flows..... | 131 |
+| 9.2.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 131 |
+| 9.2.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 132 |
+| 9.2.4 | Use case: Degradation of a communication link..... | 132 |
+| 9.2.4.1 | Description..... | 132 |
+| 9.2.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 132 |
+| 9.2.4.3 | Service flows..... | 132 |
+
+| | | |
+|---------|---------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 9.2.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 133 |
+| 9.2.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 134 |
+| 9.2.5 | Use case: Extension of Assured Voice Communication..... | 135 |
+| 9.2.5.1 | Description..... | 135 |
+| 9.2.5.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 135 |
+| 9.2.5.3 | Service flows..... | 135 |
+| 9.2.5.4 | Post-conditions..... | 135 |
+| 9.2.5.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 135 |
+| 9.3 | Functional identities and role management..... | 135 |
+| 9.3.1 | Introduction..... | 135 |
+| 9.3.2 | General pre-conditions..... | 136 |
+| 9.3.2.1 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 139 |
+| 9.3.3 | Use case: Registration to a functional identity..... | 139 |
+| 9.3.3.1 | Description..... | 139 |
+| 9.3.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 139 |
+| 9.3.3.3 | Service flows..... | 139 |
+| 9.3.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 140 |
+| 9.3.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 141 |
+| 9.3.4 | Use case: Deregistration of a functional identity..... | 142 |
+| 9.3.4.1 | Description..... | 142 |
+| 9.3.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 142 |
+| 9.3.4.3 | Service flows..... | 142 |
+| 9.3.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 142 |
+| 9.3.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 143 |
+| 9.3.5 | Use case: User log-in to the FRMCS System..... | 143 |
+| 9.3.5.1 | Description..... | 143 |
+| 9.3.5.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 143 |
+| 9.3.5.3 | Service flows..... | 144 |
+| 9.3.5.4 | Post-conditions..... | 144 |
+| 9.3.5.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 144 |
+
+| | | |
+|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 9.3.6 | Use case: User log-out from FRMCS System..... | 144 |
+| 9.3.6.1 | Description..... | 144 |
+| 9.3.6.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 144 |
+| 9.3.6.3 | Service flows..... | 144 |
+| 9.3.6.4 | Post-conditions..... | 145 |
+| 9.3.6.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 145 |
+| 9.3.7 | Use case: Presentation of identities..... | 145 |
+| 9.3.7.1 | Description..... | 145 |
+| 9.3.7.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 146 |
+| 9.3.7.3 | Service flows..... | 146 |
+| 9.3.7.4 | Post-conditions..... | 146 |
+| 9.3.7.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 147 |
+| 9.3.8 | Use case: Interrogation of identities within a certain context..... | 147 |
+| 9.3.8.1 | Description..... | 147 |
+| 9.3.8.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 147 |
+| 9.3.8.3 | Service flows..... | 147 |
+| 9.3.8.4 | Post-conditions..... | 148 |
+| 9.3.8.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 149 |
+| 9.3.9.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 152 |
+| 9.4 | Location services related use cases..... | 153 |
+| 9.4.1 | Introduction..... | 153 |
+| 9.4.2 | Use Case: Provide location information..... | 153 |
+| 9.4.2.1 | Description..... | 153 |
+| 9.4.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 153 |
+| 9.4.2.3 | Service flows..... | 153 |
+| 9.4.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 154 |
+| 9.4.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 154 |
+| 9.4.3 | Use Case: Request for location information..... | 154 |
+| 9.4.3.1 | Description..... | 154 |
+| 9.4.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 154 |
+
+| | | |
+|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 9.4.3.3 | Service flows..... | 155 |
+| 9.4.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 155 |
+| 9.4.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 155 |
+| 9.4.4 | Use Case: Request for identities in a certain area..... | 155 |
+| 9.4.4.1 | Description..... | 155 |
+| 9.4.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 156 |
+| 9.4.4.3 | Service flows..... | 156 |
+| 9.4.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 156 |
+| 9.4.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 156 |
+| 9.5 | FRMCS User communication handling related use cases..... | 156 |
+| 9.5.1 | Introduction..... | 156 |
+| 9.5.2 | Use Case: Inviting-FRMCS User(s) to a voice communication..... | 157 |
+| 9.5.2.1 | Description..... | 157 |
+| 9.5.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 157 |
+| 9.5.2.3 | Service flows..... | 157 |
+| 9.5.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 157 |
+| 9.5.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 158 |
+| 9.5.3 | Use Case: FRMCS User receiving an invitation to a voice communication..... | 158 |
+| 9.5.3.1 | Description..... | 158 |
+| 9.5.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 158 |
+| 9.5.3.3 | Service flows..... | 158 |
+| 9.5.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 158 |
+| 9.5.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 159 |
+| 9.5.4 | Use case: FRMCS User accepting an invitation to a voice communication..... | 159 |
+| 9.5.4.1 | Description..... | 159 |
+| 9.5.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 159 |
+| 9.5.4.3 | Service flows..... | 159 |
+| 9.5.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 159 |
+| 9.5.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 160 |
+| 9.5.5 | Use case: FRMCS User rejecting an invitation to a voice communication..... | 160 |
+
+| | | |
+|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 9.5.5.1 | Description..... | 160 |
+| 9.5.5.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 160 |
+| 9.5.5.3 | Service flows..... | 160 |
+| 9.5.5.4 | Post-conditions..... | 160 |
+| 9.5.5.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 161 |
+| 9.5.6 | Use case: FRMCS User ignoring an invitation to a voice communication..... | 161 |
+| 9.5.6.1 | Description..... | 161 |
+| 9.5.6.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 161 |
+| 9.5.6.3 | Service flows..... | 161 |
+| 9.5.6.4 | Post-conditions..... | 161 |
+| 9.5.6.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 161 |
+| 9.5.7 | Service interworking with GSM-R..... | 161 |
+| 9.5.7.1 | Description..... | 161 |
+| 9.5.7.2 | Pre-condition..... | 163 |
+| 9.5.7.3 | Service flow..... | 163 |
+| 9.5.7.4 | Post-condition..... | 163 |
+| 9.5.7.5 | Potential requirements..... | 164 |
+| 9.6 | Void..... | 164 |
+| 9.7 | Multiuser talker control related use cases..... | 164 |
+| 9.7.1 | General Description and potential requirements..... | 164 |
+| 9.7.1.1 | General Description..... | 164 |
+| 9.7.1.2 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 164 |
+| 9.7.2 | Use case: Set the number of simultaneous talkers..... | 164 |
+| 9.7.2.1 | Description..... | 164 |
+| 9.7.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 164 |
+| 9.7.2.3 | Service flows..... | 165 |
+| 9.7.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 165 |
+| 9.7.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 165 |
+| 9.7.3 | Use case: Set initial talker permissions and priorities..... | 165 |
+| 9.7.3.1 | Description..... | 165 |
+
+| | | |
+|---------|----------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 9.7.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 165 |
+| 9.7.3.3 | Service flows..... | 166 |
+| 9.7.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 166 |
+| 9.7.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 167 |
+| 9.7.4 | Use case: Request permission to talk..... | 167 |
+| 9.7.4.1 | Description..... | 167 |
+| 9.7.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 168 |
+| 9.7.4.3 | Service flows..... | 168 |
+| 9.7.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 168 |
+| 9.7.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 168 |
+| 9.7.5 | Use case: Grant permission to talk..... | 168 |
+| 9.7.5.1 | Description..... | 168 |
+| 9.7.5.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 168 |
+| 9.7.5.3 | Service flows..... | 169 |
+| 9.7.5.4 | Post-conditions..... | 169 |
+| 9.7.5.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 170 |
+| 9.7.6 | Use case: Revoke permission to talk..... | 170 |
+| 9.7.6.1 | Description..... | 170 |
+| 9.7.6.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 171 |
+| 9.7.6.3 | Service flows..... | 171 |
+| 9.7.6.4 | Post-conditions..... | 171 |
+| 9.7.6.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 172 |
+| 9.8 | Authorisation of communication..... | 172 |
+| 9.8.1 | Introduction..... | 172 |
+| 9.8.2 | Use case: Permit / deny communication..... | 172 |
+| 9.8.2.1 | Description..... | 172 |
+| 9.8.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 172 |
+| 9.8.2.3 | Service flows..... | 172 |
+| 9.8.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 173 |
+| 9.8.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 173 |
+
+| | | |
+|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 9.9 | Authorisation of application..... | 173 |
+| 9.9.1 | Introduction..... | 173 |
+| 9.9.2 | Use case: Enabling/Disabling applications..... | 174 |
+| 9.9.2.1 | Description..... | 174 |
+| 9.9.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 174 |
+| 9.9.2.3 | Service flows..... | 174 |
+| 9.9.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 174 |
+| 9.9.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 175 |
+| 9.9.3 | Use case: Robust mission critical group communication services..... | 176 |
+| 9.9.3.1 | Description..... | 176 |
+| 9.9.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 176 |
+| 9.9.3.3 | Service Flows..... | 177 |
+| 9.9.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 177 |
+| 9.9.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 178 |
+| 9.9.3a | Use case: Enabling/Disabling communication privileges per FRMCS User based on identities/talker status..... | 178 |
+| 9.9.3a.1 | Description..... | 178 |
+| 9.9.3a.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 178 |
+| 9.9.3a.3 | Service flows..... | 178 |
+| 9.9.3a.4 | Post-conditions..... | 179 |
+| 9.9.3a.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 180 |
+| 9.10 | Sharing FRMCS Equipment by FRMCS Users..... | 182 |
+| 9.10.1 | Description..... | 182 |
+| 9.10.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 182 |
+| 9.10.3 | Service Flows..... | 182 |
+| 9.10.4 | Post-conditions..... | 182 |
+| 9.10.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 183 |
+| 9.11 | FRMCS naming authority..... | 183 |
+| 9.11.1 | Description..... | 183 |
+| 9.11.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 183 |
+| 9.11.3 | Service Flows..... | 183 |
+
+| | | |
+|----------|----------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 9.11.4 | Post-conditions..... | 183 |
+| 9.11.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 184 |
+| 9.12 | Wayside-Centric Automatic Train Control..... | 184 |
+| 9.12.1 | Description..... | 184 |
+| 9.12.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 184 |
+| 9.12.3 | Service flows..... | 185 |
+| 9.12.4 | Post-conditions..... | 185 |
+| 9.12.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 185 |
+| 9.13 | Autonomous Train Control and Operation..... | 185 |
+| 9.13.1 | Description..... | 185 |
+| 9.13.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 186 |
+| 9.13.3 | Service Flows..... | 186 |
+| 9.13.4 | Post-conditions..... | 186 |
+| 9.13.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 187 |
+| 9.14 | Virtual Coupling..... | 187 |
+| 9.14.1 | Description..... | 187 |
+| 9.14.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 188 |
+| 9.14.3 | Service Flows..... | 189 |
+| 9.14.4 | Post-conditions..... | 189 |
+| 9.14.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 190 |
+| 9.15 | Composite-based train operation..... | 190 |
+| 9.15.1 | Description..... | 190 |
+| 9.15.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 190 |
+| 9.15.3 | Service Flows..... | 190 |
+| 9.15.4 | Post-conditions..... | 191 |
+| 9.15.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 191 |
+| 9.16 | Arbitration related use cases..... | 191 |
+| 9.16.1 | Introduction..... | 191 |
+| 9.16.2 | Use case: Arbitration..... | 192 |
+| 9.16.2.1 | Description..... | 192 |
+
+| | | |
+|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 9.16.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 192 |
+| 9.16.2.3 | Service flows..... | 192 |
+| 9.16.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 192 |
+| 9.16.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 192 |
+| 9.16.3 | Use case: Arbitration for communication auto-connection..... | 193 |
+| 9.16.3.1 | Description..... | 193 |
+| 9.16.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 193 |
+| 9.16.3.3 | Service flows..... | 193 |
+| 9.16.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 194 |
+| 9.16.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 195 |
+| 9.17 | Data communication to exchange key information for train safety application use cases..... | 196 |
+| 9.17.1 | Introduction..... | 196 |
+| 9.17.2 | Use case: Initiation of a Key Management data communication..... | 196 |
+| 9.17.2.1 | Description..... | 196 |
+| 9.17.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 196 |
+| 9.17.2.3 | Service flows..... | 196 |
+| 9.17.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 196 |
+| 9.17.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 198 |
+| 9.17.3 | Use case: Termination of a Key Management data communication..... | 199 |
+| 9.17.3.1 | Description..... | 199 |
+| 9.17.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 199 |
+| 9.17.3.3 | Service flows..... | 199 |
+| 9.17.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 199 |
+| 9.17.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 200 |
+| 9.17.4 | Use case: service interworking and service continuation with GSM-R..... | 200 |
+| 9.17.4.1 | Description..... | 200 |
+| 9.17.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 200 |
+| 9.17.4.3 | Service flows..... | 200 |
+| 9.17.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 201 |
+
+| | | |
+|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 10 | Performance support applications related use cases..... | 201 |
+| 11 | Business support applications related use cases..... | 201 |
+| 11.1 | Charging and Billing information related use cases..... | 201 |
+| 11.1.1 | Introduction..... | 201 |
+| 11.1.2 | Use case: Obtaining charging and billing information..... | 202 |
+| 11.1.2.1 | Description..... | 202 |
+| 11.1.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 202 |
+| 11.1.2.3 | Service flows..... | 202 |
+| 11.1.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 202 |
+| 11.1.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 202 |
+| 12 | FRMCS System principles related use cases..... | 202 |
+| 12.1 | FRMCS System principles overview..... | 202 |
+| 12.2 | Area Broadcast Group Communication interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS Users..... | 203 |
+| 12.2.1 | Description..... | 203 |
+| 12.2.2 | Pre-condition..... | 203 |
+| 12.2.3 | Service flow..... | 204 |
+| 12.2.4 | Post-condition..... | 204 |
+| 12.2.5 | Potential requirements..... | 204 |
+| 12.3 | Location Service interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS Users..... | 204 |
+| 12.3.1 | Description..... | 204 |
+| 12.3.2 | Pre-condition..... | 204 |
+| 12.3.3 | Service flow..... | 205 |
+| 12.3.4 | Post-condition..... | 205 |
+| 12.3.5 | Potential requirements..... | 205 |
+| 12.4 | Presence interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS Users..... | 205 |
+| 12.4.1 | Description..... | 205 |
+| 12.4.2 | Pre-condition..... | 205 |
+| 12.4.3 | Service flow..... | 205 |
+| 12.4.4 | Post-condition..... | 205 |
+
+| | | |
+|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 12.4.5 | Potential requirements..... | 205 |
+| 12.5 | Point to Point communication between GSM-R and FRMCS Users..... | 206 |
+| 12.5.1 | Description..... | 206 |
+| 12.5.2 | Pre-condition..... | 206 |
+| 12.5.3 | Service flow..... | 206 |
+| 12.5.4 | Post-condition..... | 206 |
+| 12.5.5 | Potential requirements..... | 206 |
+| 12.6 | Interworking with legacy systems including LMR..... | 206 |
+| 12.6.1 | Description..... | 206 |
+| 12.6.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 206 |
+| 12.6.3 | Service flows..... | 207 |
+| 12.6.4 | Post-conditions..... | 207 |
+| 12.6.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 207 |
+| 12.7 | Use case: Builds stable positioning framework for FRMCS services and devices including trainborne and handheld devices..... | 207 |
+| 12.7.1 | Description..... | 207 |
+| 12.7.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 208 |
+| 12.7.3 | Service flows..... | 208 |
+| 12.7.4 | Post-conditions..... | 208 |
+| 12.7.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 208 |
+| 12.8 | Interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS..... | 208 |
+| 12.8.1 | Introduction..... | 208 |
+| 12.8.2 | Circuit Switched interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS..... | 209 |
+| 12.8.2.1 | Description..... | 209 |
+| 12.8.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 209 |
+| 12.8.2.3 | Service flows..... | 209 |
+| 12.8.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 209 |
+| 12.8.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 210 |
+| 12.8.3 | Packet Switched interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS..... | 210 |
+| 12.8.3.1 | Description..... | 210 |
+| 12.8.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 210 |
+
+| | | |
+|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 12.8.3.3 | Service flows..... | 210 |
+| 12.8.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 210 |
+| 12.8.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 211 |
+| 12.8.4 | SMS/SDS interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS..... | 211 |
+| 12.8.4.1 | Description..... | 211 |
+| 12.8.4.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 211 |
+| 12.8.4.3 | Service Flows..... | 211 |
+| 12.8.4.4 | Post-conditions..... | 211 |
+| 12.8.4.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 211 |
+| 12.9 | Use case: Bearer flexibility..... | 211 |
+| 12.9.1 | Description..... | 211 |
+| 12.9.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 212 |
+| 12.9.3 | Service flows..... | 212 |
+| 12.9.4 | Post-conditions..... | 213 |
+| 12.9.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 215 |
+| 12.10 | Use Case: QoS in a railway environment..... | 216 |
+| 12.10.1 | Introduction..... | 216 |
+| 12.10.2 | Use case: Quality of Service and railway environment..... | 217 |
+| 12.10.2.1 | Description..... | 217 |
+| 12.10.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 217 |
+| 12.10.2.3 | Service flows..... | 217 |
+| 12.10.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 220 |
+| 12.10.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 220 |
+| 12.11 | Use case: Provide broadband and mission critical services with seamless connectivity..... | 225 |
+| 12.11.1 | Description..... | 225 |
+| 12.11.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 225 |
+| 12.11.3 | Service flows..... | 225 |
+| 12.11.4 | Post-conditions..... | 226 |
+| 12.11.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 226 |
+| 12.12 | Use case: Offer railway services high-quality control functions with real-time train status monitoring..... | 226 |
+
+| | | |
+|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 12.12.1 | Description..... | 226 |
+| 12.12.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 226 |
+| 12.12.3 | Service flows..... | 227 |
+| 12.12.4 | Post-conditions..... | 227 |
+| 12.12.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 227 |
+| 12.13 | Use case: Provide call priority during interworking with LMR..... | 227 |
+| 12.13.1 | Description..... | 227 |
+| 12.13.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 228 |
+| 12.13.3 | Service flows..... | 228 |
+| 12.13.4 | Post-conditions..... | 228 |
+| 12.13.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 229 |
+| 12.14 | Use Case: FRMCS Positioning Accuracy..... | 229 |
+| 12.14.1 | Introduction..... | 229 |
+| 12.14.2 | Use case: FRMCS Positioning Accuracy..... | 230 |
+| 12.14.2.1 | Description..... | 230 |
+| 12.14.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 231 |
+| 12.14.2.3 | Service flows..... | 231 |
+| 12.14.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 232 |
+| 12.14.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 232 |
+| 12.15 | Use Case: FRMCS System security framework..... | 232 |
+| 12.15.1 | Introduction..... | 232 |
+| 12.15.2 | Use case: FRMCS System security framework..... | 233 |
+| 12.15.2.1 | Description..... | 233 |
+| 12.15.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 233 |
+| 12.15.2.3 | Service flows..... | 233 |
+| 12.15.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 233 |
+| 12.15.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 234 |
+| 12.16 | Use Case: Interworking to external networks..... | 235 |
+| 12.16.1 | Introduction..... | 235 |
+| 12.16.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 236 |
+
+| | | |
+|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 12.16.2.3 | Service flows..... | 236 |
+| 12.16.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 237 |
+| 12.16.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 238 |
+| 12.17 | Use Case: FRMCS On-network/Off-network communication..... | 239 |
+| 12.17.1 | Introduction..... | 239 |
+| 12.17.2 | Use case: On-network/Off-network communication..... | 240 |
+| 12.17.2.1 | Description..... | 240 |
+| 12.17.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 242 |
+| 12.17.2.3 | Service flows..... | 242 |
+| 12.17.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 243 |
+| 12.17.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 244 |
+| 12.18 | Call restriction service..... | 245 |
+| 12.18.1 | Description..... | 245 |
+| 12.18.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 245 |
+| 12.18.3 | Service Flows..... | 245 |
+| 12.18.4 | Post-conditions..... | 245 |
+| 12.18.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 245 |
+| 12.19 | Allocation and isolation of FRMCS communication resources..... | 245 |
+| 12.19.1 | Introduction..... | 245 |
+| 12.19.2 | Use case: Isolation of FRMCS communication resources..... | 246 |
+| 12.19.2.1 | Description..... | 246 |
+| 12.19.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 246 |
+| 12.19.2.3 | Service flows..... | 246 |
+| 12.19.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 246 |
+| 12.19.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 247 |
+| 12.20 | FRMCS Equipment capabilities for multiple FRMCS Users..... | 247 |
+| 12.20.1 | Introduction..... | 247 |
+| 12.20.2 | Description..... | 248 |
+| 12.20.3 | Pre-conditions..... | 248 |
+| 12.20.4 | Service flows..... | 248 |
+
+| | | |
+|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 12.20.5 | Post-conditions..... | 248 |
+| 12.20.6 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 248 |
+| 12.21 | FRMCS System/FRMCS User roaming capabilities..... | 248 |
+| 12.21.1 | Introduction..... | 248 |
+| 12.21.2 | Use case: FRMCS User is relocating towards a Visited (FRMCS) Network..... | 249 |
+| 12.21.2.1 | Description..... | 249 |
+| 12.21.2.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 249 |
+| 12.21.2.3 | Service flows..... | 249 |
+| 12.21.2.4 | Post-conditions..... | 249 |
+| 12.21.2.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 250 |
+| 12.21.3 | Use case: Functional Identities in FRMCS Roaming situations..... | 250 |
+| 12.21.3.1 | Description..... | 250 |
+| 12.21.3.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 251 |
+| 12.21.3.3 | Service flows..... | 251 |
+| 12.21.3.4 | Post-conditions..... | 251 |
+| 12.21.3.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 252 |
+| 12.22 | Use case: Availability – increasing measures..... | 252 |
+| 12.22.1 | Description..... | 252 |
+| 12.22.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 253 |
+| 12.22.3 | Service flows..... | 253 |
+| 12.22.4 | Post-conditions..... | 253 |
+| 12.22.5 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 253 |
+| 12.23 | Use case: Flexible use of available contiguous spectrum blocks(s) and related bandwidth(s)..... | 253 |
+| 12.23.1 | Introduction..... | 253 |
+| 12.23.2 | Description..... | 254 |
+| 12.23.3 | Pre-conditions..... | 254 |
+| 12.23.4 | Service flows..... | 254 |
+| 12.23.5 | Post-conditions..... | 254 |
+| 12.23.6 | Potential requirements and gap analysis..... | 254 |
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
+| 13 | Potential New Requirements..... | 254 |
+| 14 | Conclusion and Recommendations..... | 254 |
+| Annex A: | Examples of Role management..... | 255 |
+| Annex B: | Minimum functional and performance requirements for FRMCS from a perspective of Korea LTE-based railway services..... | 257 |
+| Annex C: | Applicability to On-network/Off-network communication..... | 261 |
+| Annex D: | Change history..... | 266 |
+
+## Foreword
+
+This Technical Report has been produced by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).
+
+The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within the TSG and may change following formal TSG approval. Should the TSG modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by the TSG with an identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows:
+
+Version x.y.z
+
+where:
+
+- x the first digit:
+ - 1 presented to TSG for information;
+ - 2 presented to TSG for approval;
+ - 3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control.
+- y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections, updates, etc.
+- z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document.
+
+## Introduction
+
+The railway community is considering a successor communication system to GSM-R, as the forecasted obsolescence of the 2G-based GSM-R technology is envisaged around 2030, with first FRMCS trial implementations expected to start around 2020.
+
+The Future Railway Mobile Communication System (FRMCS) Functional Working Group (FWG) of the International Union of Railways (UIC) have investigated and summarised their requirements for the next generation railway communication system in the Future Railway Mobile Communication User Requirements Specification (FRMCS URS) [2]. The present document is based on this input given by the UIC/ETSI TC-RT
+
+---
+
+# 1 Scope
+
+The present document analyses FRMCS Use cases, system principles of FRMCS and Interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS in order to derive potential requirements.
+
+---
+
+# 2 References
+
+The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present document.
+
+- References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or non-specific.
+ - For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.
+ - For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document *in the same Release as the present document*.
+- [1] 3GPP TR 21.905: "Vocabulary for 3GPP Specifications".
+- [2] 3GPP TS 36.213 V14.0.0, Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical layer procedures, 2016.
+- [3] 3GPP TS 23.179 V13.3.0, Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Functional architecture and information flows to support mission critical communication services; Stage 2. 2016.
+- [4] TTA TTAK.KO-06.0437, LTE Based Railway Communication System Requirements (Conventional and High Speed Railway), Dec. 2016.
+- [5] TTA TTAK.KO-06.0370, User Requirements for LTE-Based Railway Communication System, Oct. 2014.
+- [6] TTA TTAK KO-06.0-369, Functional Requirements for LTE-Based Communication System, Oct. 2014.
+- [7] Y.-S. Song, J. Kim, S. W. Choi, and Y.-K. Kim, "Long term evolution for wireless railway communications: Testbed deployment and performance evaluation," *IEEE Comm. Mag.*, Feb. 2016.
+- [8] J. Kim, S. W. Choi, Y.-S. Song, and Y.-K. Kim, "Automatic train control over LTE: Design and performance evaluation," *IEEE Comm. Mag.*, Oct. 2015.
+- [9] UNISIG Subset-041 ERTMS/ETCS Performance Requirements for Interoperability
+- [10] UIC FU-7100: "FRMCS User Requirements Specification".
+- [11] UIC MG-7900: "FRMCS Use Cases".
+- [12] UIC CODE 950: "EIRENE Functional Requirements Specification (FRS)".
+- [13] UIC CODE 951: "EIRENE System Requirements Specification (SRS)".
+
+## 3 Definitions, and abbreviations
+
+### 3.1 Definitions
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the terms and definitions given in 3GPP TR 21.905 [1] and the following apply. A term defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same term, if any, in 3GPP TR 21.905 [1].
+
+**Automatic Train Operation (ATO):** Automatic Train Operation applications are responsible for acceleration to the permitted speed, speed reduction where necessary due to speed restrictions and stop at designated stations in the correct location.
+
+**Automatic Train Protection (ATP):** Automatic Train Protection applications are responsible for giving Limit of Movement Authority to a train based on the train's current speed, its braking capability and the distance it can go before it must stop.
+
+**Balise:** An electronic beacon or transponder placed between the rails of a railway as part of an automatic train protection or operation (ATP/ATO) system.
+
+**Business communication applications:** communication applications that support the railway business operation in general, such as wireless internet, etc.
+
+**Controller (Train Controller):** A Ground FRMCS User provided with special capabilities by the FRMCS System.
+
+**Driver (Train Driver):** A Mobile FRMCS User provided with special capabilities by the FRMCS System.
+
+**External System(s):** A general category of stationary FRMCS Users. For example, External Systems could be systems monitoring for trains passing a red light to initiate a railway emergency call.
+
+**FRMCS Application:** The application on a 3GPP UE offering railway specific communication services to the FRMCS User by making use of the communication capabilities offered by the 3GPP UE and the 3GPP network.
+
+**FRMCS Equipment Identity:** The identity by which a FRMCS equipment can be addressed.
+
+**FRMCS Equipment Type:** Indicates the purpose the FRMCS equipment is being used for, FRMCS equipment of different equipment types do have different capabilities.
+
+**FRMCS Equipment:** The FRMCS Equipment consists of a 3GPP UE and a FRMCS Application residing on it. It may be combined with legacy railway communication equipment (e.g. GSM-R or TRS)
+
+**FRMCS Functional Identity:** The identity related to a user or related to the equipment, as specified in 9.3 "Role management and presence" indicating its special Role (e.g. as Driver of a specific train, usually a train number) can be addressed.
+
+**FRMCS Network:** this is a sub-part of the FRMCS System.
+
+**FRMCS Roaming:** The ability for a FRMCS User to make use of FRMCS Applications in a Visited (FRMCS) Network.
+
+**FRMCS System:** The system providing railway specific communication constituted of the FRMCS Equipment, the 3GPP transport and the application servers in the network. Legacy networks are not included in the FRMCS System.
+
+**FRMCS User Identity:** The identity by which a FRMCS User can be addressed.
+
+**FRMCS User:** A human user or a machine making use of the railway specific communication. FRMCS Users can be connected via 3GPP RAT, wired connectivity or other radio technology
+
+**Ground FRMCS User:** A general category of FRMCS Users that are predominantly stationary. Mostly they are connected via wired connectivity but may be using also wireless in certain conditions.
+
+**Home FRMCS Network:** The Home FRMCS Network is the network in which the FRMCS User is engaged in a subscription.
+
+**Mobile FRMCS User:** A general category of FRMCS Users that are mobile. Thus, they are connected via wireless connectivity all the time.
+
+**Off-Network communication:** direct communication between FRMCS Users in proximity.
+
+**On-Network communication:** indirect communication between FRMCS Users connected to FRMCS Network(s).
+
+**Performance communication applications:** applications that help to improve the performance of the railway operation, such as train departure, telemetry, etc.
+
+**Radio Block Centre (RBC):** A train sends its position and speed information periodically to the RBC. The RBC uses the received information to decide movement authority of the train.
+
+**Rail Infrastructure Manager:** A company that owns or manages rail infrastructure; within this document the Rail Infrastructure Manager owns, administers and operates the FRMCS Network.
+
+**Railways Undertaking:** A company that offers train freight or passenger transportation services, making use of FRMCS network for their operational communication needs that is operated by a Rail Infrastructure Manager.
+
+**Role (Functional Role):** The function a FRMCS User or a FRMCS Equipment is currently performing. Examples of Roles are Driver, Controller or shunting staff, etc. This is indicated by the FRMCS Functional Identity.
+
+**Shunting:** manoeuvring trains in order to change their location or composition.
+
+**Trackside staff:** Staff working as trackside maintenance and/or shunting members
+
+**Trainborne equipment:** FRMCS Equipment which is physically embedded in train
+
+**Visited (FRMCS) Network:** A Visited (FRMCS) Network can be either another FRMCS Network than the Home FRMCS Network, or a Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN).
+
+## 3.2 Abbreviations
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the abbreviations given in 3GPP TR 21.905 [1] and the following apply. An abbreviation defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same abbreviation, if any, in 3GPP TR 21.905 [1].
+
+| | |
+|------|-------------------------------------|
+| ATO | Automatic Train Operation |
+| ATP | Automatic Train Protection |
+| AVC | Assured Voice Communication |
+| DoS | Denial of Service |
+| GNSS | Global Navigation Satellite System |
+| LMR | Land Mobile Radio |
+| MACN | Multi Access Core Network |
+| NA | Naming Authority |
+| OATP | On-board Automatic Train Protection |
+| PSAP | Public Safety Answering Point |
+| RBC | Radio Block Centre |
+| REC | Railway Emergency Communication |
+| TRS | Trunked Radio System |
+
+---
+
+## 4 Overview
+
+The present document is an 800 series Technical Report (TR) written by 3GPP TSG SA WG1 (SA1). Such a TR is not normative, i.e. cannot be used for implementation directly and cannot be referred to by other 3GPP specifications. It was primarily written by SA1 to summarise the high-level communication needs of the railway community and to identify the corresponding requirements, which, in another step have been introduced into normative Technical Specifications (TS) of 3GPP.
+
+An 800 series TR will not be updated when in the process of introduction of the requirements to TS changes are made to those requirements, i.e. the text of the requirements listed here in this TR will not be aligned with the requirements in the TS. Due to the fact that most of the requirements identified in this document were introduced in already existing Mission Critical Communication (MCX) TS, an alignment with the MCX terminology and functionality was made resulting in most of the requirements in here being reworded in the TS. Also, TS requirements changes due to future work affecting requirements stemming from this TR will not result in updates of this TR.
+
+However, the columns “Comments” of the requirements tables listed below were updated to indicate the disposition of the requirement in the TS and most of the time summarising deviations and decisions taken when introducing those requirement into normative TS. By following these references into the normative TS the functionality provided by 3GPP for railway communication can be derived by the reader.
+
+FRMCS will adapt 3GPP transport to provide communication to railway users. It eventually will resemble GSM-R and will additionally provide communication capabilities beyond what GSM-R has been able to. It will provide higher data rates, lower data latencies, multimedia communication, and improved communication reliability. FRMCS considers end-to-end use cases and also provides requirements that might or might not be in scope of 3GPP existing specifications. To facilitate smooth migration from legacy communication systems (e.g. GSM) to FRMCS, interworking requirements between legacy communication systems and FRMCS are provided.
+
+FRMCS Equipment shall connect to application domain through 3GPP radio access or other access. It provides emergency group communication, low latency and high reliable data and video service in high speed train environment. Amongst others it has the following important features:
+
+- Prioritized emergency group communication, train control data and video service
+- Seamless connectivity in high speed railway moving environments
+- Low latency and high reliable data and video service
+- Real time train monitoring and management for safe train operation
+- Reliable location tracking including in tunnel tracking
+- Legacy railway communication interworking to GSM-R system
+
+
+
+Figure 4-1: High-level relation of FRMCS and legacy systems. The diagram shows the interconnection between a Public Fixed Network (PSTN), Public GSM, GSM-R System, GSM-R UE, GSM-R User, FR(M)CS-System, and FR(M)CS-User. The FR(M)CS-System is a large box containing Railway Sub-System (Application domain), Core domain, 3GPP radio access (4G and beyond), non3GPP radio access, Wireline access, and FR(M)CS-Equipment. Arrows indicate bidirectional connections between the PSTN, GSM-R System, and FR(M)CS-System, and between the GSM-R UE and the FR(M)CS-Equipment. The GSM-R User is connected to the GSM-R UE, and the FR(M)CS-User is connected to the FR(M)CS-Equipment.
+
+**Figure 4-1: High-level relation of FRMCS and legacy systems**
+
+Basically, railway communication services [5] can be categorized into
+
+- Train control services
+- Maintenance services
+- Railway specific services (such as Railway Emergency Call, functional addressing, and location-based addressing)
+- Other services (providing train crews or train Drivers with information of train operation and interworking with the existing railway communication systems)
+
+This study categorizes all the use cases by considering inherent characteristics of railway applications. Specifically, the following categories of use cases are considered.
+
+- Basic functionality
+- Critical communication applications
+- Performance communication applications
+- Business communication applications
+- Critical support applications
+- Performance support applications
+- Business support applications
+- FRMCS System principles
+
+The categories can be depicted conceptually as follows:
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the hierarchy of FRMCS applications. At the top level (High), there are support applications: Critical, Performance, and Business. The middle level contains communication applications of the same categories. The bottom level (Low) consists of basic functionality.
+
+Diagram showing the grouping of FRMCS Applications by application level. A vertical blue arrow on the left indicates levels from 'High' at the top to 'Low' at the bottom. The applications are organized into a grid within a rounded rectangle labeled 'FRMCS system principles'. The top two rows contain six boxes: 'Critical support applications', 'Performance support applications', 'Business support applications' in the first row; 'Critical communication applications', 'Performance communication applications', 'Business communication applications' in the second row. The bottom row contains a single wide box labeled 'Basic functionality'.
+
+**Figure 4-2: Grouping of FRMCS Applications**
+
+## 5 Basic functionality use cases
+
+### 5.1 Introduction
+
+The basic functionality use cases describe the behaviour of the FRMCS Equipment when powered up and down. For power up it takes the already powered up 3GPP UE as starting point conversely the same applies for power down.
+
+### 5.2 Device power on and shut-down related use cases
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to the function Initialisation and shut-down are defined.
+
+- Power on the UE
+- Access to the FRMCS System
+- Controlled power down UE
+- Uncontrolled power down UE
+
+Note: Annex A provides examples of Role management (such as functional identities or FRMCS Equipment Identities) in the railway environment.
+
+### 5.3 Use case: Power on the UE
+
+#### 5.3.1 Description
+
+This use case provides the user with a powered-on UE.
+
+#### 5.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The UE is switched off.
+
+Note: In this use case and all the following it is assumed the UE contains a FRMCS Application, thus an UE with FRMCS Application is further referred to as FRMCS Equipment.
+
+### 5.3.3 Service flows
+
+#### Successful self-test
+
+The user switches on the UE.
+
+The FRMCS Application performs a self-test. If the test is successful, the user is informed about this.
+
+#### Unsuccessful self-test
+
+The user switches on the UE.
+
+The FRMCS Application performs a self-test. If the test is not successful, the user is informed about this.
+
+### 5.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The UE is switched on and attached to a 3GPP network following normal 3GPP defined network selection procedures but not logged into any FRMCS System. The user is informed about the results of the self-test.
+
+### 5.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------|
+| [R-5.3-001] | The FRMCS Application shall be capable to perform a self-test and inform the user about the results. | A | N/A | Implementation requirement |
+
+## 5.4 Use case: Access to the FRMCS System to activate the FRMCS Equipment
+
+### 5.4.1 Description
+
+This use case describes how the FRMCS Equipment registers to the FRMCS System.
+
+### 5.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The UE is powered on and attached to a 3GPP network but is not registered to the FRMCS System.
+
+The UE has a subscriber identity.
+
+### 5.4.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS Equipment selects an applicable FRMCS System and logs on to it.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment is initialised by the FRMCS System according to its type.
+
+### 5.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+The FRMCS Equipment capabilities are activated.
+
+The FRMCS Application(s) are running on the device.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment is logged in to the FRMCS System
+
+## 5.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------|
+| [R-5.4-001] | When a FRMCS Equipment registers to the FRMCS System, the FRMCS Equipment capabilities are activated and the FRMCS Equipment shall be reachable by its FRMCS Equipment Identity. | A | N/A | Implementation requirement |
+
+## 5.5 Use case: Controlled power down of UE
+
+### 5.5.1 Description
+
+The UE is powered down.
+
+### 5.5.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The UE is switched on and the FRMCS Equipment is registered to the FRMCS System.
+
+### 5.5.3 Service flows
+
+The user / FRMCS User initiates power-down of the UE.
+
+If logged in, a FRMCS User is logged-out from the FRMCS System.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment will deregister all identities which are active.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment de-registers from the FRMCS System.
+
+The UE is switched off.
+
+### 5.5.4 Post-conditions
+
+The UE is de-registered from the FRMCS System and switched off.
+
+## 5.5.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------|
+| [R-5.5-001] | When the UE is about to be powered down, a FRMCS User logged into the FRMCS System shall be logged off first. | A | N/A | Implementation requirement |
+| [R-5.5-002] | By logging off the functional Role of a FRMCS User shall be deregistered from the FRMCS System. | A | N/A | Implementation requirement |
+| [R-5.5-003] | After logging off the FRMCS User, the FRMCS Equipment capabilities shall be deactivated and the FRMCS Equipment shall be removed from the FRMCS System. | A | N/A | Implementation requirement |
+
+## 5.6 Use case: Uncontrolled power down UE
+
+### 5.6.1 Description
+
+This use case describes the case when the UE is powered down in an uncontrolled way e.g. due to battery failure.
+
+### 5.6.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The UE is switched on, the FRMCS Equipment is registered to the FRMCS System.
+
+### 5.6.3 Service flows
+
+The UE loses power probably without being able to notify the FRMCS System.
+
+The UE is without power.
+
+The FRMCS System will deregister all identities associated with the FRMCS Equipment.
+
+### 5.6.4 Post-conditions
+
+The UE is de-registered from the FRMCS System and switched off.
+
+### 5.6.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------|
+| [R-5.6-001] | When the UE is uncontrolled powered down, a FRMCS User logged into the FRMCS System shall be logged out from the FRMCS System. | A | N/A | Implementation requirement |
+| [R-5.6-002] | By logging out the functional Role of the FRMCS User shall be deregistered from the FRMCS System. | A | N/A | Implementation requirement |
+
+---
+
+## 6 Critical communication applications related use cases
+
+### 6.1 Introduction
+
+Critical communications applications are essential for train movements, safety, shunting, presence, trackside maintenance, legal aspects such as emergency communications, etc.
+
+### 6.2 Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s)
+
+#### 6.2.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to the function of Multi-train voice communication from the Drivers and/or a Ground FRMCS User towards the Driver and/or Ground FRMCS Users are defined. Ground FRMCS Users may include Controllers. The following use cases are defined:
+
+- Initiation of Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) communication
+- Termination of Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) communication
+- Interworking GSM-R and FRMCS for Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) communication
+
+#### 6.2.2 Use case: Initiation of Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) communication
+
+##### 6.2.2.1 Description
+
+A Driver and/or a Ground FRMCS User shall be able to initiate a voice communication to other Drivers and/or Ground FRMCS Users.
+
+##### 6.2.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The Driver and the Ground FRMCS User are authorised to initiate the communication. This is managed by the authorisation of communication application.
+
+The authorisation application authorises the Driver and the Ground FRMCS User to use the Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s)
+
+##### 6.2.2.3 Service flows
+
+The Driver and/or Ground FRMCS User initiates the voice communication to the (other) Driver(s) and/or Ground FRMCS Users. The priority of the communication is managed by the prioritisation application.
+
+The FRMCS System determines the Driver(s) and the Ground FRMCS User(s) to be included in the communication, based on:
+
+- location information of all users provided by the locations services application, and/or
+- functional identity of all users provided by the Role management and presence application.
+
+The FRMCS System establishes the voice communication within a setup time specified as NORMAL (see 12.10). The information from the Role management and presence application is used to present the identities for both Driver(s) and Controller(s). The initiating Driver is indicated to the Controller(s). Also the location of the Driver(s) in the voice communication is presented to the Controller(s) which is retrieved from the location services application.
+
+If the Driver and/or Ground FRMCS User is connected to more than one Drivers and/or Controllers, the multiuser talker control application is used.
+
+The precedence of the incoming voice communication at the Driver and the Controller is managed by the prioritisation application.
+
+The voice communication is recorded by the Voice recording and access application.
+
+#### 6.2.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The Driver and/or the Controller is connected to requested Driver(s) and/or Controller(s).
+
+## 6.2.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.2.2-001] | For a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) the FRMCS Users shall be able to initiate the voice communication to FRMCS Users in trains or on ground. | A | 22.280
22.179 | TS 22.179 Floor Control clause 6.2.3.2 Req #1,
TS 22.280 clause 5.1 Req # 2 |
+| [R-6.2.2-002] | For a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) the application layer priority of the communication shall be managed by the prioritisation application. | A | 22.280 | 6.8.7 Application layer priority, 7.6 MCX Service priority requirements |
+| [R-6.2.2-003] | For a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) the FRMCS System shall be able to determine the FRMCS User(s) to be included in the voice communication, based, amongst others, on the following criteria:
location information, speed and direction of travel provided by the locations services application, and/or functional identity provided by the Role management and presence application.
System configuration on which Controller is responsible for which part of the track/station/etc. | A | 22.280 | 6.4.9 req #6, 5.17 req # 3, 6.1 req #5, R-6.1.005, R6.6.5.2-00X
6.6.4.1.1, 6.6.4.1.2, 6.6.4.2-002a,002b
5.9a-006, 5.9a-008a |
+| [R-6.2.2-004] | For a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) the FRMCS System shall be able to add or remove FRMCS User from the communication once criteria are met or no more met, e.g. by a FRMCS User entering or leaving an area | A | 22.280 | 6.4.9 req #6, 5.17 req # 3, 6.1 req #5, R-6.1.005, R6.6.5.2-00X
6.6.4.1.1, 6.6.4.1.2, 6.6.4.2-002a,002b
5.9a-006, 5.9a-008a |
+| [R-6.2.2-005] | For a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) the FRMCS System shall establish the communication within a setup time specified as NORMAL (see 12.10). | A/T | N/A | See section 12.10 below |
+| [R-6.2.2-006] | The FRMCS System shall be able to mutually present the identities of all communication partners involved in a Multi-train voice communication for | A | 22.280 | 5.3 req #2, 5.7 req # 3, 6.4.3 req # 1 & #2
Presentation of the id of the speaker is sufficient
See reqs in 6.4.5 |
+
+| | | | | |
+|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| | Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s). | | | |
+| [R-6.2.2-006a] | The FRMCS System shall be able to present the location of the Driver(s) to the Ground FRMCS Users involved in a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s). | A | 22.280 | 5.11 001, 008, 015
6.12 001,006,007
6.4.5 001, 003, 004 |
+| [R-6.2.2-006b] | The FRMCS System shall be able to update the presentation of the location of the Drivers as they move. | A | 22.280 | 5.11 007, 009, 013
6.12 006 |
+| [R-6.2.2-007] | For a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s), always includes more than two participants.
If only two participants remain, the communication shall be treated as a user-to-user communication. | A | N/A | This is not a service requirement. It is up to 3GPP SA6 to decide whether a communication with only two has to change the mode of operation to 1-2-1 communication. |
+| [R-6.2.2-008] | For a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s), multiuser talker control shall be used (See "9.7 Multiuser talker control related use cases"). | A | N/A | This is not a service requirement. It is up to 3GPP SA6 to decide whether a communication with only two has to change the mode of operation to 1-2-1 communication. |
+| [R-6.2.2-009] | For a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) on the application layer the precedence of the incoming voice communication at the Driver and the Ground FRMCS User shall be managed by the prioritisation application. | A | N/A | See section 9.16 below |
+| [R-6.2.2-010] | The FRMCS System shall be able to make available the speech and communication related data of a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) for recording. | A | 22.280 | On-Net:6.15.4-001 – 010
Off-Net: Not implemented |
+
+## 6.2.3 Use case: Termination of Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) communication
+
+### 6.2.3.1 Description
+
+The Driver shall be able to either put on hold, leave, or terminate the voice communication.
+
+The Controller(s) shall be able to either put on hold, leave or terminate the voice communication.
+
+### 6.2.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The Driver to Controller and/or Driver voice communication is ongoing.
+
+### 6.2.3.3 Service flows
+
+#### **Driver on hold**
+
+The Driver shall be able to put the voice communication on hold.
+
+After the Driver has put the voice communication on hold, the communication remains in the FRMCS System, and the Driver is able to return to the communication again. When put on hold the other participants in the communication are informed and can continue the communication.
+
+#### **Driver leaving**
+
+The Driver shall be able to leave the voice communication. The Driver is not able to return to the communication after he has left. The Driver is not able to terminate the voice communication. When a Driver has left the other participants in the communication are informed and can continue the communication if there are still Driver(s) involved in the communication.
+
+The FRMCS System terminates the voice communication if the last Driver has left (although (multiple) Controllers are still active in the communication). All involved users are informed.
+
+#### **Ground FRMCS User on hold**
+
+A Ground FRMCS User shall be able to put the voice communication on hold in the case that more than one Ground FRMCS User is part of the voice communication. The Ground FRMCS User is able to return to the communication again.
+
+When put on hold the other participants in the communication are informed and can continue the communication.
+
+#### **Ground FRMCS User leaving**
+
+A Ground FRMCS User shall be able to leave the voice communication. The Ground FRMCS User is not able to return to the communication after he has left.
+
+After the Ground FRMCS User has left the voice communication, the remaining users are informed.
+
+#### **Controller termination**
+
+Any Controller shall be able to terminate the voice communication.
+
+The FRMCS System terminates the voice communication. All involved users are informed.
+
+#### **Driver termination**
+
+Only the Driver who initiates the call is able to terminate the voice communication with other Drivers.
+
+The FRMCS System terminates the voice communication if only one Driver remains in the voice communication.
+
+### 6.2.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+A Controller or the Driver has left the voice communication or the Controller or the system has terminated, put on hold or left the communication.
+
+### 6.2.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.2.3-001] | For a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers including Ground FRMCS User(s) a Driver or a Ground FRMCS User shall be able to put the voice communication on hold. The voice communication between the remaining users shall not be affected by a Driver or Ground FRMCS User putting the voice communication on hold. | A | 22.280 | 5.4.1, 5.4.2, 5.1.5
R-6.4.4-003, R-6.4.4-004
The affiliation mechanism is considered sufficient to mimic the desired behaviour. |
+| [R-6.2.3-002] | For a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers including Ground FRMCS User(s) the Driver shall be able to leave the communication.
Note: After a Driver has left the communication he is not able to return to it. | A | 22.280 | 5.4.1, 5.4.2, 5.1.5
R-6.4.4-003, R-6.4.4-004
The affiliation mechanism is considered sufficient to mimic the desired behaviour. |
+| [R-6.2.3-003] | For a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers including Ground FRMCS User(s) the Driver is not able to terminate the communication. | A | 22.179 | 6.2.3.4, 6.2.3.5, 6.2.4 |
+| [R-6.2.3-005] | For a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers including Ground FRMCS User(s) the FRMCS System terminates the voice communication if the last Driver has left (although (multiple) Ground FRMCS Users are still active in the communication). All involved users are informed. | A | 22.280
22.179 | 22.179 6.2.4 008
22.280 6.4.9 001
CR 22.280 0048 rev1: R-6.1-006, R-6.4.9-001 |
+| [R-6.2.3-006] | For a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers including Ground FRMCS User(s) a Ground FRMCS Users shall be able to leave the communication. After a Ground FRMCS User or a Driver has left the communication, the remaining users are informed. | A | 22.280 | 6.4.4 002; 6.4.5 001; 5.1.5 003-008
R-6.4.4-003, R-6.4.4-004
The affiliation mechanism is considered sufficient to mimic the desired behaviour. |
+| [R-6.2.3-007] | For a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers including Ground FRMCS User(s) any Controller shall be able to terminate the communication. All involved users are informed. | A | N/A | Due to the use of the affiliation mechanism and the burst-oriented nature of the MCPTT communication there is no such thing like a termination of a communication. It is simply not used anymore and the |
+
+| | | | | |
+|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| | | | | MCX Service deletes the identifiers and reservation for it after some time. |
+| [R-6.2.3-008] | For a Multi-train voice communication between Drivers, the FRMCS System shall allow only the initiating Driver to terminate the voice communication. | A | N/A | Due to the use of the affiliation mechanism and the burst-oriented nature of the MCPTT communication there is no such thing like a termination of a communication. It is simply not used anymore and the MCX Service deletes the identifiers and reservation for it after some time. |
+| [R-6.2.3-009] | For a Multi-train voice communication between Drivers, the FRMCS System shall terminate the voice communication if only one Driver remains in the voice communication. | A | N/A | Due to the use of the affiliation mechanism and the burst oriented nature of the MCPTT communication there is no such thing like a termination of a communication. It is simply not used anymore and the MCX Service deletes the identifiers and reservation for it after some time. |
+
+## 6.2.4 Use case: Service Interworking and service continuation between GSM-R and FRMCS for Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) communication
+
+### 6.2.4.1 Description
+
+For migration purposes the service interworking and service continuation between the GSM-R system and FRMCS System for Multi-train voice communication for Drivers including Ground FRMCS User(s) communication needs to be defined.
+
+Interworking between FRMCS and GSM-R shall not require any changes in the GSM-R system.
+
+Depending on the migration scenario a Ground FRMCS User or a Driver can be attached to the FRMCS system, to the GSM-R system or both. The Driver can be attached either in the GSM-R system or in the FRMCS System. Functional identities are applicable in one system only.
+
+This use case only applies to end user devices supporting both FRMCS and GSM-R systems.
+
+### 6.2.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+None.
+
+### 6.2.4.3 Service flows
+
+#### Driver attached to GSM-R
+
+When the Driver is attached to the GSM-R system and is initiating voice communication to other Drivers and Ground FRMCS User, the GSM-R system will route the voice communication to other Drivers the Ground FRMCS User (s) accordingly.
+
+If the Driver or the Ground FRMCS User is located in the FRMCS System, the GSM-R system can only route the call if it can be reached by an address or identity understood by the GSM-R system. The Role management in FRMCS provides the appropriate address or identity e.g. by providing a mapping of GSM-R identities and FRMCS identities.
+
+The information from the Role management and presence application is used to route the communication and to present the identities of both Driver and Ground FRMCS User.
+
+#### **Driver attached to FRMCS**
+
+When the Driver is attached to the FRMCS System and is initiating voice communication to other Drivers and Ground FRMCS User, the FRMCS System will route the communication to the Ground FRMCS User accordingly. The information from the Role management and presence application is used to route the communication and to present the identities of both Driver and Ground FRMCS User. The Role management in FRMCS shall provide the appropriate address or identity e.g. by provide a mapping of GSM-R identities and FRMCS identities.
+
+#### **Driver moving from GSM-R to FRMCS**
+
+When the GSM-R user equipment of the Driver is detached from the GSM-R system the FRMCS end user device shall provide service continuation by setting up the communication via the FRMCS System. An interruption of voice communication is acceptable.
+
+Note: This use case only applies to end user devices supporting both FRMCS and GSM-R systems, i.e. contains a FRMCS UE and a GSM-R UE. It is assumed the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS Equipment will have some control of the GSM-R part of the UE.
+
+#### **Driver moving from FRMCS to GSM-R**
+
+When the FRMCS User equipment of the Driver is detached from the FRMCS System the FRMCS end user device shall provide service continuation by setting up the communication via the GSM-R system. An interruption of voice communication is acceptable.
+
+Note: This use case only applies to end user devices supporting both FRMCS and GSM-R systems, i.e. contains a FRMCS UE and a GSM-R UE. It is assumed the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS Equipment will have some control of the GSM-R part of the UE.
+
+#### **6.2.4.4 Post-conditions**
+
+None.
+
+#### 6.2.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------|
+| [R-6.2.4-001] | The FRMCS System shall provide the necessary means to allow FRMCS Users to be reachable from a legacy GSM-R system. Interworking between FRMCS and GSM-R shall not require any changes on GSM-R network side. | A | 22.179 | Covered in 6.18.4.2 |
+| [R-6.2.4-002] | The FRMCS System shall provide the necessary means to FRMCS Users to set up a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) also to users in legacy GSM-R systems. Interworking between FRMCS and GSM-R shall not require any changes on GSM-R network side. | A | 22.179 | Covered in 6.18.4.2 |
+| [R-6.2.4-003] | For Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s), when the GSM-R UE becomes detached from the GSM-R system, e.g. due to coverage problems, the end user device, if capable of making use of the FRMCS System shall be able set up the communication on the FRMCS System. An interruption of voice communication is acceptable.
Note 1: This use case only applies to end user devices containing a FRMCS UE and a GSM-R UE. It is assumed the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS Equipment will have some control of the GSM-R part of the UE which is referred to here as end user device. | A | 22.280 | Covered by 6.6.4.1.2 and 6.6.5.2 |
+| [R-6.2.4-004] | For Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s), when the FRMCS Equipment, becomes detached from the FRMCS System, e.g. due to coverage problems, the end user device, if capable of making use of legacy GSM-R shall be able to set up the | A | | Covered by GSM-R "Late Entry" |
+
+| | | | | |
+|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|
+| | communication on legacy GSM-R. An interruption of voice communication is acceptable.
Note 2: This use case only applies to end user devices containing a FRMCS Equipment and a GSM-R UE. It is assumed the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS Equipment will have some control of the GSM-R part of the UE which is referred to here as end user device.
| | | |
+|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|
+
+## 6.3 On-train outgoing voice communication from the Driver towards the Controller(s) of the train
+
+### 6.3.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to the function of On-train outgoing voice communication from the Driver towards the Controller(s) of the train are defined. This use case allows the Driver to only communicate with Controllers. The following use cases are defined:
+
+- Initiation of Driver to Controller(s) voice communication
+- Termination of Driver to Controller(s) voice communication
+- Interworking GSM-R and FRMCS of Driver to Controller(s) communication
+
+### 6.3.2 Use case: Initiation of Driver to Controller(s) voice communication
+
+#### 6.3.2.1 Description
+
+The Driver shall be able to initiate a voice communication to the Controller(s) that was, is, or will be responsible for the movement of the train.
+
+#### 6.3.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The Driver is authorised to initiate the voice communication to the Controller. This is managed by the authorisation of voice communication application.
+
+The Driver is authorised to use the On-train outgoing voice communication from the Driver towards the Controller(s) of the train application by the application authorisation of application.
+
+#### 6.3.2.3 Service flows
+
+##### Driver to responsible Controller(s)
+
+The Driver initiates the voice communication to the Controller. The priority of the communication is managed by the prioritisation application.
+
+The FRMCS System determines the responsible Controller(s), based on:
+
+- location information of the train provided by the locations services application, and/or
+- functional identity provided by the Role management and presence application.
+- system configuration on which Controller is responsible for which part of the track/station/etc.
+
+The FRMCS System establishes the voice communication to the Controller(s) within a setup time specified as NORMAL (see 12.10). The information from the Role management and presence application is used to present the identities for both Driver and Controller. Also, the location of the Driver is presented to the Controller which is retrieved from the location services application.
+
+If the Driver is connected to more than one Controller, the multiuser talker control application is used.
+
+The precedence of the incoming voice communication at the Controller is managed by the prioritisation application.
+
+The voice communication is recorded by the voice recording and access application.
+
+#### **Driver to another Controller(s)**
+
+The Driver initiates the voice communication to the Controller who was or will be responsible for the movement of the train. The addressing is performed by selecting an entry from a list or entered manually. The priority of the communication is managed by the prioritisation application.
+
+The FRMCS System presents the list of Controllers to the Driver, based on:
+
+- location information provided by the locations services application, and/or
+- functional identity provided by the Role management and presence application.
+- system configuration on which Controller is responsible for which part of the track/station/etc.
+
+The FRMCS System establishes the voice communication to the Controller(s) within a setup time specified as NORMAL (see 12.10). The information from the Role management and presence application is used to present the identities for both Driver and Controller. Also, the location of the Driver is presented to the Controller which is retrieved from the location services application.
+
+If the Driver is connected to more than one Controller, the multiuser talker control application is used.
+
+The precedence of the incoming voice communication at the Controller is managed by the prioritisation application.
+
+The voice communication is recorded by the Voice recording and access application.
+
+#### **6.3.2.4 Post-conditions**
+
+The Driver is connected to the requested Controller.
+
+### 6.3.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.3.2-001] | For Driver to Controller voice communication, the Driver shall be able to initiate a voice communication to the Controller who is currently responsible for the train. The application layer priority of the voice communication shall be managed by the prioritisation application. | A | 22.280 | 22.280 6.8.7.1, 6.8.7.2; 5.1.1 002
22.179 6.2.3.7.3 001 |
+| [R-6.3.2-002] | For Driver to Controller voice communication the FRMCS System shall be able to determine the responsible Controller(s), based on e.g.: location information, speed and direction provided by the locations services application, and/or functional identity provided by the Role management and presence application. System configuration on which Controller is responsible for which part of the track/station/etc. | A | 22.280 | CR 22.280 0049rev3, 6.6.4.1.1, 6.6.4.1.2, Req 6.6.4.2-002a,002b |
+| [R-6.3.2-003] | For Driver to Controller voice communication the FRMCS System shall add or remove FRMCS User from the communication once criteria are met or no more met, e.g. by a FRMCS User entering or leaving an area. | A | 22.280 | CR 22.280 0049rev3, 6.6.4.1.1, 6.6.4.1.2, Req 6.6.4.2-002a,002b |
+| [R-6.3.2-004] | For Driver to Controller communication the FRMCS System shall establish the communication to the Controller(s) within a setup time specified as NORMAL (see 12.10). | A/T | N/A | See section 12.10 below |
+| [R-6.3.2-005] | The FRMCS System shall be able to mutually present the identities of all communication partners involved in a Driver to Controller(s) voice communication. | A | 22.280 | TS 22.280, 5.3 req #2, 5.7 req # 3, 6.4.3 req # 1 & #2
22.280 6.12-006
The id of the speaker is considered sufficient
See reqs in 6.4.5 |
+| [R-6.3.2-006] | The FRMCS System shall be able to present the location of the Driver to the Controller(s) involved in a Driver to Controller(s) voice communication. | A | 22.280 | 22.280
5.11 001, 008, 015
6.12 001,006,007
6.4.5 001, 003, 004
22.280 R-6.4.4-003, R-6.4.4-004 |
+| [R-6.3.2-007] | The FRMCS System shall be able to update the presentation of the location of | | 22.280 | 22.280
5.11 007, 009, 013
6.12 006 |
+
+| | | | | |
+|--|---------------------------|--|--|--|
+| | the Drivers as they move. | | | |
+|--|---------------------------|--|--|--|
+
+| | | | | |
+|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.3.2-007 a] | For Driver to Controller communication, if the Driver is connected to just one Controller, the communication shall be considered as a user-to-user communication. | A | 22.280 | This is not a service requirement it is up to 3GPP SA6 to decide whether a communication with only two has to change the mode of operation to 1-2-1 communication |
+| [R-6.3.2-008] | For Driver to Controller voice communication, if the Driver is connected to more than one Controller, the multiuser talker control shall be used (See "9.7 Multiuser talker control related use cases"). | A | 22.179 | CRs 22.179 adding and CRs subsequently changing Section 5.9a |
+| [R-6.3.2-009] | For Driver to Controller communication on application layer the precedence of the incoming voice communication at the Controller shall be managed by the prioritisation application. | A | 22.280 | See section 9.16 below |
+| [R-6.3.2-010] | The FRMCS System shall be able to make available the speech and communication related data of a Multi-train voice communication for Drivers including Ground FRMCS User(s) for recording. | A | 22.280 | On-Net:6.15.4-001 – 010
Off-Net: Not implemented |
+| [R-6.3.2-011] | For Driver to Controller communication the Driver shall be able to initiate the communication to the Controller who was previously or will be responsible next for the movement of the train. The selection shall be performed by selecting an entry from a list or entered manually. The priority of the communication on application layer shall be managed by the prioritisation application. | A | 22.280 | CR 22.280 0049rev3: 5.9a-006, 5.9a-008a, 6.6.4.1.1, 6.6.4.1.2, Req 6.6.4.2-002a,002b |
+| [R-6.3.2-012] | For Driver to Controller communication the FRMCS System shall be able to present the list of Controllers to the Driver in order to select from, based on, amongst others, the following criteria: location information, speed and direction provided by the locations services application, and/or functional identity provided by the Role management and presence application. System configuration on which Controller is responsible for | A | 22.280 | CR 22.280 0049rev3: 5.9a-006, 5.9a-008a, 6.6.4.1.1, 6.6.4.1.2, Req 6.6.4.2-002a,002b |
+
+| | | | | |
+|--|--------------------------------------|--|--|--|
+| | which part of the track/station/etc. | | | |
+|--|--------------------------------------|--|--|--|
+
+### 6.3.3 Use case: Termination of Driver to Controller(s) voice communication
+
+#### 6.3.3.1 Description
+
+The Driver shall be able to terminate the Driver to Controller voice communication. The Driver is not able to leave the communication or to put on hold.
+
+The Controller(s) shall be able to either put on hold, leave or terminate the Driver to Controller communication.
+
+#### 6.3.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The Driver to Controller voice communication is ongoing.
+
+#### 6.3.3.3 Service flows
+
+##### **Driver termination**
+
+The Driver shall be able to terminate the voice communication. The FRMCS System terminates the voice communication. All involved Controllers are informed.
+
+Note: The Driver is not able to leave the communication or to put on hold.
+
+##### **Controller on hold**
+
+A Controller shall be able to put the Driver to Controller voice communication on hold in the case that more than one Controller is part of the voice communication.
+
+After the Controller has put the voice communication on hold, the communication remains in the FRMCS System, and the Controller is able to be part of the communication again.
+
+##### **Controller leaving**
+
+A Controller shall be able to leave the Driver to Controller voice communication in the case that more than one Controller is part of the voice communication.
+
+After the Controller has left the voice communication he is not able to return to the communication and the remaining users are informed.
+
+##### **Controller termination**
+
+Any Controller shall be able to terminate the Driver to Controller voice communication.
+
+The FRMCS System terminates the voice communication. All involved users are informed.
+
+#### 6.3.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+A Controller has left the voice communication or the Driver to Controller voice communication is terminated.
+
+### 6.3.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.3.3-001] | For Driver to Controller communication the Driver shall be able to terminate the communication. | A | 22.280
22.179 | 22.280 6.4.9 001
22.179 6.4.9 002, 6.2.4 008 |
+| [R-6.3.3-002] | For Driver to Controller communication the FRMCS System shall allow the operator to configure whether a Driver shall be able to leave the voice communication. | A | 22.280 | CR 22.280: 5.9a-012a, 5.9a-012b |
+| [R-6.3.3-003] | For Driver to Controller communication the FRMCS System shall allow the operator to configure whether a Driver shall be able to put the voice communication on hold. | A | 22.280 | 22.280, 5.4.1, 5.4.2, 5.1.5
The affiliation mechanism is considered sufficient to mimic the desired behavior. |
+| [R-6.3.3-004] | For Driver to Controller communication a Controller shall be able to put the voice communication on hold in the case that more than one Controller is part of the communication. The voice communication between the remaining users shall not be affected by a Controller putting the voice communication on hold. | A | 22.280 | 22.280 6.4.4 002; 6.4.5 001; 5.1.5 003-008
22.280 R-6.4.4-003, R-6.4.4-004
The affiliation mechanism is considered sufficient to mimic the desired behavior. |
+| [R-6.3.3-005] | For Driver to Controller communication a Controller shall be able to leave the Driver to Controller communication in the case that more than one Controller is part of the communication. After a Controller has left the communication, the remaining users shall be informed. | A | 22.280 | 22.280 6.4.4 002; 6.4.5 001; 5.1.5 003-008
22.280 R-6.4.4-003, R-6.4.4-004
The affiliation mechanism is considered sufficient to mimic the desired behavior. |
+| [R-6.3.3-006] | For Driver to Controller communication any Controller shall be able to terminate the Driver to Controller communication. All involved users shall be informed. | A | 22.280
22.179 | 22.280 6.4.9 001
22.179 6.2.4 008 |
+
+### 6.3.4 Use case: Service Interworking and service continuation between GSM-R and FRMCS of Driver to Controller(s) voice communication
+
+#### 6.3.4.1 Description
+
+For migration purposes the service interworking and service continuation between the GSM-R system and FRMCS System for Driver to Controller(s) voice communication needs to be defined.
+
+Interworking between FRMCS and GSM-R shall not require any changes in the GSM-R system.
+
+Depending on the migration scenario a Controller can be attached to the FRMCS system, to the GSM-R system or both. The Driver can be attached either in the GSM-R system or in the FRMCS System. Functional identities are applicable in one system only.
+
+This use case only applies to end user devices supporting both FRMCS and GSM-R systems.
+
+#### 6.3.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+None.
+
+#### 6.3.4.3 Service flows
+
+##### **Driver attached to GSM-R**
+
+When the Driver is attached to the GSM-R system and is initiating voice communication to Controller(s), the GSM-R system will route the voice communication to the Controller(s) accordingly.
+
+If the Controller is located in the FRMCS System, the GSM-R system can only route the call to the Controller if the Controller can be reached by an address or identity understood by the GSM-R system. The Role management in FRMCS provides the appropriate address or identity e.g. by providing a mapping of GSM-R identities and FRMCS identities.
+
+The information from the Role management and presence application is used to route the communication and to present the identities of both Driver and Controller.
+
+##### **Driver attached to FRMCS**
+
+When the Driver is attached to the FRMCS System and is initiating voice communication to Controller(s), the FRMCS System will route the communication to the Controller(s) accordingly. The information from the Role management and presence application is used to route the communication and to present the identities of both Driver and Controller. The Role management in FRMCS shall provide the appropriate address or identity e.g. by provide a mapping of GSM-R identities and FRMCS identities.
+
+##### **Driver moving from GSM-R to FRMCS**
+
+When the GSM-R user equipment of the Driver is detached from the GSM-R system the FRMCS end user device shall provide service continuation by setting up the communication via the FRMCS System. An interruption of voice communication is acceptable.
+
+Note: This use case only applies to end user devices supporting both FRMCS and GSM-R systems, i.e. contains a FRMCS UE and a GSM-R UE. It is assumed the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS Equipment will have some control of the GSM-R part of the UE.
+
+##### **Driver moving from FRMCS to GSM-R**
+
+When the FRMCS User equipment of the Driver is detached from the FRMCS System the FRMCS end user device shall provide service continuation by setting up the communication via the GSM-R system. An interruption of voice communication is acceptable.
+
+Note: This use case only applies to end user devices supporting both FRMCS and GSM-R systems, i.e. contains a FRMCS UE and a GSM-R UE. It is assumed the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS Equipment will have some control of the GSM-R part of the UE.
+
+#### 6.3.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+None.
+
+### 6.3.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.3.4-001] | The FRMCS System shall provide the necessary means to allow FRMCS Users to be reachable from a legacy GSM-R system. Interworking between FRMCS and GSM-R shall not require any changes on GSM-R network side. | A | 22.179 | Covered in 6.18.4.2 |
+| [R-6.3.4-002] | The FRMCS System shall provide the necessary means to FRMCS Users to set up a Driver to Controller voice communication also to users in legacy GSM-R systems. Interworking between FRMCS and GSM-R shall not require any changes on GSM-R network side. | A | 22.179 | Covered in 6.18.4.2 |
+| [R-6.3.4-003] | For Driver to Controller communication, when the GSM-R UE becomes detached from the GSM-R system, e.g. due to coverage problems, the end user device, if capable of making use of the FRMCS System shall be able set up the communication on the FRMCS System. An interruption of voice communication is acceptable.
Note 1: This use case only applies to end user devices containing a FRMCS UE and a GSM-R UE. It is assumed the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS Equipment will have some control of the GSM-R part of the UE which is referred to here as end user device. | A | N/A | Call has to be re-established by UE. This is UE function outside scope of 3GPP standardization |
+| [R-6.3.4-004] | For Driver to Controller communication, when the FRMCS Equipment, becomes detached from the FRMCS System, e.g. due to coverage problems, the end user device, if capable of making use of legacy GSM-R shall be able to set up the communication on legacy GSM-R. An interruption of voice communication is | A | N/A | Call has to be re-established by UE. This is UE function outside scope of 3GPP |
+
+| | | | | |
+|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|
+| | acceptable.
Note 2: This use case only applies to end user devices containing a FRMCS Equipment and a GSM-R UE. It is assumed the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS Equipment will have some control of the GSM-R part of the UE which is referred to here as end user device.
| | | |
+|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|
+
+## 6.4 Railway emergency communication
+
+### 6.4.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to Railway emergency communication are defined. The following use cases are defined:
+
+- Initiation of the Railway emergency alert
+- New entry to the Railway emergency alert
+- Changing of the Railway emergency alert
+- Merging of Railway emergency alerts
+- Leaving of the Railway emergency alert
+- Termination of the Railway emergency alert;
+- Initiation of railway emergency voice communication
+- Termination of railway emergency voice communication
+- Initiation of Data communication during Railway emergency Alert
+- Service interworking and service continuation with GSM-R
+- Interface to train borne recorder
+
+### 6.4.2 General overview
+
+Railway emergency communication serves two main purposes in railway operation
+
+- Alert Drivers or other railway staff about an emergency. Receiving such alert will result in immediate actions to be taken by the recipients. These actions are defined by operational rules, e.g. a Driver will slow down train speed to 40km/h, drive on sight, etc.
+- Based on operational rules, additional information about the emergency can be exchanged using voice and/or data communication.
+
+While the alert needs to be setup very fast, the information part that may follow is less time critical and not always required. The Railway emergency Communication consists of:
+
+1. A mandatory alert phase indicating the emergency;
+2. An optional voice and/or data communication phase depending on operational situation and / or operational rules.
+
+Alert is the general term used that encompasses the different phases initiation, continuation and termination. This receives priority handling which is linked to the application category within the FRMCS System (see 12.10).
+
+When a railway emergency alert is triggered by a FRMCS User, the FRMCS System determines which other FRMCS Users shall receive an alert, depending on following conditions:
+
+- Location, accuracy of the location, track, functional identity, direction of movement, speed of the initiating entity
+- Location, accuracy of the location, track, functional identity, direction of movement, speed of the FRMCS Users which are concerned of the emergency
+- Any additional information provided by the initiating entity
+
+By applying alert conditions, only FRMCS Users who are concerned by this emergency will receive an alert. Figure 6.4.2-1 outlines this principle.
+
+
+
+Legend:
+
+- Affected area (e.g accident)
+- .- Traffic Controller's area of responsibility
+- Poor accuracy of location information available
+- ! No alert due to location, speed, direction and/or accuracy of location information
+- ! Alert due due to location, speed, direction and/or accuracy of location information
+
+Figure 6.4.2-1: Illustration of FRMCS Users in a railway emergency alert area. The diagram shows a railway track with a train that has derailed at a junction, marked by a yellow starburst. A red dashed circle indicates the 'Affected area (e.g accident)'. A blue dash-dot circle indicates the 'Traffic Controller's area of responsibility'. Several workers are shown: some with green exclamation marks (no alert) and others with orange exclamation marks (alert). Arrows labeled 'MOVE' point away from the accident area. A legend on the left explains the symbols: red dashed circle for affected area, blue dash-dot circle for traffic controller's area, green dashed circle for poor accuracy, green exclamation mark for no alert, and orange exclamation mark for alert.
+
+**Figure 6.4.2-1 Illustration of FRMCS Users in a railway emergency alert area**
+
+Independently of any ongoing interactions between the FRMCS User and the FRMCS Equipment, the railway emergency alert has to be continuously indicated to the FRMCS User until the railway emergency is over (alert is terminated).
+
+While an alert is active, the FRMCS System shall continuously check:
+
+- If additional FRMCS Users do match to the conditions of the railway emergency alert. FRMCS User entering the emergency area/location/etc. will receive the alert.
+- If an FRMCS User does not fulfil the conditions to be alerted anymore, because the FRMCS User has moved away from the emergency area, the alert will be withdrawn from this FRMCS User.
+
+A Controller is able to change the conditions to select the applicable FRMCS Users while an alert is active.
+
+While an alert is active on a FRMCS Equipment, the FRMCS User is still able to establish and / or receive other types of communication. If a railway emergency voice communication is established by the FRMCS User of an ongoing alert, any other ongoing voice communications are terminated.
+
+## 6.4.3 Use case: Initiation of the railway emergency alert
+
+### 6.4.3.1 Description
+
+An FRMCS- user is able to initiate a railway emergency alert. Based on a set of conditions the FRMCS System will determine which FRMCS Users that shall be informed about the emergency.(see 6.4.2 General overview) The targeted FRMCS User can be e.g. a mobile FRMCS User, a Driver, an External System, a Controller, maintenance staff or a member of a shunting team.
+
+### 6.4.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The initiating FRMCS User is authorised to establish a railway emergency alert.
+
+### 6.4.3.3 Service flows
+
+In any service flow, a mobile FRMCS User, e.g. a Driver, a maintenance staff or a member of a shunting team, is not able to leave or terminate the railway emergency alert.
+
+#### **Controller initiated**
+
+The Controller provides the conditions (e.g. train number/area/track section/station) to the FRMCS System selecting the appropriate recipients of the railway emergency alert. The conditions (e.g. train number/area/track section/station) can be pre-configured for comfortable selection by the Controller. The Controller may need to confirm the selection.
+
+The FRMCS System will determine, based on the conditions, which FRMCS Users are to receive the railway emergency alert.
+
+The FRMCS System alerts the FRMCS Users within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). The alert notification can include additional information (e.g. text, voice prompts) which is presented to the FRMCS User.
+
+The priority of the railway emergency alert is managed by the prioritisation application. The alert has the priority which matches the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see 12.10) within the FRMCS System.
+
+In case a FRMCS User is already involved in another railway emergency alert, FRMCS System does not forward new alerts to this particular FRMCS User. The waiting alert is sent as soon as the FRMCS User is no longer involved in the other railway emergency alert.
+
+The Controller is informed about the alerted FRMCS Users.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment of a Controller shows multiple alerts when active.
+
+The communication is recorded by the Data recording and access to recorded data application.
+
+#### **External system initiated**
+
+FRMCS System receives the conditions from the External System (e.g. a list/train number/area/track section/station) to address/determine the appropriate recipients of the railway emergency alert.
+
+The FRMCS System will determine, based on the conditions, which users will receive the railway emergency alert.
+
+The FRMCS System alerts the FRMCS Users within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). The alert notification can include additional information (e.g. text, voice prompts) which are presented to the FRMCS Users.
+
+The priority of the railway emergency alert is managed by the prioritisation application. The alert has the priority which matches the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see 12.10) within the FRMCS System.
+
+In the case that a mobile FRMCS User is already active in another railway emergency alert, the FRMCS System does not forward new alerts to this particular FRMCS User. A waiting alert is sent as soon as the FRMCS User is no longer involved in an ongoing railway emergency alert. The Controller is informed about the alerted FRMCS Users and the alert initiating External System.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment of a Controller shows multiple alerts when active.
+
+The communication is recorded by the Data recording and access to recorded data application.
+
+#### **Mobile FRMCS User initiated**
+
+A FRMCS User, like a Driver, maintenance staff or a member of a shunting team, presses the railway emergency button.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment requests the alert communication to the FRMCS System.
+
+The FRMCS System determines the FRMCS Users to be included in the railway emergency alert. This is based on the location information of the initiator and certain conditions (e.g. functional identity, track area, accuracy of the location, maximum track speed, station, shunting yard, location/speed/direction of users).
+
+The FRMCS System alerts the FRMCS- users within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). The alert notification can include additional information (e.g. text, voice prompts) which are forwarded to the concerned FRMCS Users.
+
+The priority of the railway emergency alert is managed by the prioritisation application. The alert has the priority that matches the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see 12.10) within the FRMCS System.
+
+In the case that a mobile FRMCS User is already active in another railway emergency alert, the FRMCS System does not forward new alerts to this particular FRMCS User. A waiting alert is sent as soon as the FRMCS User is no longer involved in an ongoing railway emergency alert. The applicable Controller(s) is informed about the alerted FRMCS Users, including which user initiated the alert.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment of a Controller shows multiple alerts when active.
+
+The communication is recorded by the Data recording and access to recorded data application.
+
+#### **6.4.3.4 Post-conditions**
+
+The applicable FRMCS Users are alerted.
+
+### 6.4.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.4.3-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to deliver railway emergency alerts. Requests to initiate a railway emergency alerts may come from Controllers, External Systems or mobile FRMCS Users | A | 22.280 | R-5.6.2.4.1-002 ( etc.)
R-5.6.2.1.2-002
R-6.8.8.4.1-006 (Using User regroup, not 5.6.2.4.1-005)
R-6.6.4.1-XXX User regroup
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup:
R-6.15.5.2-001 |
+| [R-6.4.3-002] | For requests from Controllers or External Systems, the FRMCS System shall be able to determine which FRMCS Users shall receive the railway emergency alert, based on the conditions supplied with the requests (e.g. a list/train number/area/track section/station). | A | 22.280 | R-5.6.2.4.1-004
R-6.8.8.4.1-006 (Using User regroup, not 5.6.2.4.1-005)
R-6.6.4.1-XXX User regroup
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup:
R-6.15.5.2-001 & R-6.15.5.2-014 |
+| [R-6.4.3-003] | For requests from FRMCS-users, based on the location information of the initiator and certain other conditions such as functional identity, track area, accuracy of the location, maximum track speed, station, shunting yard, speed and direction, the FRMCS System shall be able to determine which FRMCS Users shall receive the railway emergency alert. | A | 22.280 | R-5.6.2.1.2-002
R-5.6.2.4.1-004
R-6.8.8.4.1-006 (Using User regroup, not 5.6.2.4.1-005)
R-6.6.4.1-XXX User regroup
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup:
R-6.15.5.2-001 & R-6.15.5.2-014 |
+| [R-6.4.3-004] | In case no FRMCS- users can be determined to be alerted the FRMCS System shall apply the behaviour as specified in 6.4.4 "New entry". | A | 22.280 | R-6.6.4.2-002b
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup:
R-6.15.5.2-014 |
+| [R-6.4.3-005] | The FRMCS System shall be able to provide additional information (e.g. text, voice prompts) in the railway emergency alert to be forwarded to the FRMCS Users | A | 22.282 | Using MCData SDS and File Distribution for that - based on the same group i.e. after the MCX Emergency Alert a SDS is initiated and potentially a File Dist. as described in MCData
22.282 R-5.2.2-XXX & 5.3.2-XXX |
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.4.3-006] | The FRMCS System shall be able to prevent FRMCS User(s), other than a Controller, involved in another railway emergency alert, to receive an additional railway emergency alert. In this case when the FRMCS User is no more involved in the other railway emergency alert, the FRMCS System shall forward the railway emergency alert to this FRMCS User. | A | 22.280 | 5.4.2-XXX
[R-5.4.2-007a] |
+| [R-6.4.3-007] | The FRMCS System shall be able to provide all applicable alerts to a Controller independent of whether involved in another alert or not to allow the Controllers to switch between different alerts. | A | 22.280 | 5.4.2-XXX
[R-5.4.2-007a] |
+| [R-6.4.3-008] | The FRMCS System shall not prevent a FRMCS User to make use of other communication services while involved in a railway emergency alert. | A | 22.280 | Covered by the affiliation mechanism |
+| [R-6.4.3-009] | The FRMCS System shall be able to deliver the railway emergency alert within a time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). | A&T | N/A | See section 12.10 below |
+| [R-6.4.3-010] | For railway emergency alert the application layer priority of the communication shall be managed by the prioritisation application. | A | 22.280 | 5.4.2-XXX
5.6.X, 6.8.7.X, etc
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup: R-6.15.5.2-008 |
+| [R-6.4.3-011] | When setting up and during the alert, the FRMCS System shall inform the initiator and the involved Controller(s) which FRMCS Users are alerted and who initiated the railway emergency alert. | A | 22.280 | 5.3 req #2, 5.7 req # 3, 6.4.3 req # 1 & #2
6.12-006
The id of the speaker is considered sufficient |
+| [R-6.4.3-012] | The FRMCS System shall be able to make available the speech and communication related data of a railway emergency alert for recording. | A | 22.280 | 6.15.4-001 - 010 |
+
+## 6.4.4 Use case: New entry to the railway emergency alert
+
+### 6.4.4.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS System shall continuously check if additional FRMCS Users meet the conditions of the railway emergency alert. The FRMCS User can be e.g. a mobile FRMCS User, a Driver, maintenance staff, a member of a shunting team or a Controller. The additional FRMCS Users receive the railway emergency alert.
+
+### 6.4.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User is authorised (referring to authorisation of application) to receive the railway emergency alert. There is an ongoing railway emergency alert.
+
+### 6.4.4.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS System shall continuously check if additional FRMCS Users meet the conditions of the railway emergency alert. The FRMCS User can be e.g. a mobile FRMCS User, a Driver, maintenance staff, a member of a shunting team or a Controller.
+
+The FRMCS System alerts the FRMCS- users within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). The alert notification can include additional information (e.g. text, voice prompts) which is forwarded to the FRMCS Equipment.
+
+The priority of the railway emergency alert is managed by the prioritisation application. The alert has the priority that matches the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see 12.10) within the FRMCS System.
+
+In the case of an ongoing railway emergency voice communication, the additional FRMCS User is added to the ongoing voice communication.
+
+In case that a FRMCS User is already active in another railway emergency alert, FRMCS System does not forward the new alerts to this particular FRMCS- user. The waiting alert is sent as soon as the FRMCS User is no longer involved in an ongoing railway emergency alert.
+
+A mobile FRMCS User, e.g. a Driver, maintenance staff or a member of a shunting team, is not able to leave or terminate the railway emergency alert.
+
+The Controller is informed about additionally alerted FRMCS User.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment of a Controller shows multiple alerts when active.
+
+The communication is recorded by the Data recording and access to recorded data application.
+
+### 6.4.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+The additional FRMCS Users are alerted.
+
+#### 6.4.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.4.4-001] | The FRMCS System shall continuously check if additional FRMCS Users meet the conditions of a railway emergency alert. | A | 22.280 | R-6.6.4.2-002b
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup: R-6.15.5.2-014 |
+| [R-6.4.4-002] | The FRMCS System shall be able to deliver the railway emergency alert to the new FRMCS User(s) within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). | A&T | N/A | See section 12.10 below
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup: R-6.15.5.2-008 |
+| [R-6.4.4-003] | The FRMCS System shall be able to forward additional information (e.g. text, voice prompts) in the railway emergency alert to the new FRMCS Users. | A | 22.280 | [R-5.2.2-014] |
+| [R-6.4.4-004] | When added to a railway emergency alert a FRMCS User shall still be able to use other communications. | A | N/A | No requirements identified that might prevent a MCX User to receive other communication while in MEA |
+| [R-6.4.4-005] | For railway emergency alert the application layer priority of the communication shall be managed by the prioritisation application. | A | 22.280 | 5.4.2-XXX
5.6.X, 6.8.7.X
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup: R-6.15.5.2-008 |
+| [R-6.4.4-006] | If a FRMCS User, other than a Controller, is involved in another railway emergency alert, the FRMCS System shall not forward the railway emergency alert to this FRMCS User. When the FRMCS User is no more involved in the other railway emergency alert, the FRMCS System shall forward the railway emergency alert to this FRMCS User. | A | 22.280 | 5.4.2-XXX
[R-5.4.2-007a] |
+| [R-6.4.4-007] | The FRMCS System shall provide all applicable alerts to a Controller independent of whether involved in another alert or not to allow the Controllers to switch between different alerts. | A | 22.280 | 5.4.2-XXX
[R-5.4.2-007a] |
+| [R-6.4.4-008] | The FRMCS System shall inform the initiator and the involved Controller(s) which FRMCS Users are additionally alerted. | A | 22.280 | 5.3 req #2, 5.7 req # 3, 6.4.3 req # 1 & #2
22.280 6.12-006
See reqs in 6.4.5 |
+| [R-6.4.4-009] | The FRMCS System shall be able to make available the speech and communication | A | 22.280 | 6.15.4-001 - 010 |
+
+| | | | | |
+|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|
+| | related data of a railway emergency voice communication for recording. | | | |
+|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|
+
+## 6.4.5 Use case: Changing of the railway emergency alert
+
+### 6.4.5.1 Description
+
+An authorised Controller or an External System is able to change the conditions selecting the appropriate recipients of the railway emergency alert. The change may result in an expansion or a reduction of FRMCS Users that shall be informed about the emergency.
+
+### 6.4.5.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User is authorised to change the conditions of the railway emergency alert. This is managed by the application authorisation of application.
+
+There is an ongoing railway emergency alert.
+
+### 6.4.5.3 Service flows
+
+The Controller or an External System shall be able to change the conditional criteria selecting the appropriate recipients of the railway emergency alert.
+
+The FRMCS System shall continuously check if FRMCS Users still meet the conditions of the railway emergency alert. The FRMCS User can be e.g., a mobile FRMCS User, a Driver, maintenance staff, a member of a shunting team or a Controller.
+
+The FRMCS System shall forward the railway emergency alert to all additional FRMCS Users within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). The alert notification can include additional information (e.g., text, voice prompts) which are forwarded to the FRMCS User.
+
+The priority of the railway emergency alert is managed by the prioritisation application. The alert has the priority that matches the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see 12.10) within the FRMCS System.
+
+In case of an ongoing railway emergency voice communication, the additional FRMCS Users are added.
+
+In case FRMCS User is already active in another railway emergency alert, the new alert is not forwarded by the FRMCS System to this particular FRMCS User. If the FRMCS User is no longer involved in an ongoing railway emergency alert, the waiting alert is forwarded by the FRMCS System.
+
+The FRMCS System shall update the FRMCS Users for whom the railway emergency alert is no longer applicable and terminates the alert. The termination notification of the alert can include additional information (e.g., text, voice prompts) which are forwarded to the FRMCS User.
+
+The priority of the railway emergency alert is managed by the prioritisation application. The alert has the priority that matches the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see 12.10) within the FRMCS System.
+
+In case railway emergency alert conditions does not match any longer to a FRMCS User and if there is an ongoing railway emergency voice communication, the FRMCS User will remain in the ongoing railway emergency voice communication.
+
+FRMCS System informs the Controller about the FRMCS Users who have left and have joined the railway emergency alert.
+
+A mobile FRMCS User, e.g., a Driver, maintenance staff or a member of a shunting team, is not able to leave or terminate the Railway emergency alert.
+
+The communication is recorded by the Data recording and access to recorded data application.
+
+#### 6.4.5.4 Post-conditions
+
+The appropriate recipients remain as alerted, while non-appropriate recipients are not alerted anymore.
+
+#### 6.4.5.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.4.5-001] | If alert conditions are changed by an authorised Controller or an External System, the FRMCS System shall check if additional FRMCS Users match the conditions of the railway emergency alert. | A | 22.280 | R-6.6.4.2-002b
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup: R-6.15.5.2-014 |
+| [R-6.4.5-002] | The FRMCS System shall forward the railway emergency alert to new FRMCS Users that match the conditions and inform the initiating Driver and Controller(s) accordingly. | A | 22.280 | [R-5.2.2-014]
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup: R-6.15.5.2-014 |
+| [R-6.4.5-003] | The FRMCS System shall withdraw the alert from those FRMCS Users who do not match the conditions anymore and inform them and the initiating Driver and Controller(s) accordingly. | A | 22.280 | R-5.3-XXX
R-5.6.2.4.1-004
R-6.8.8.4.1-006 (Using User regroup, not 5.6.2.4.1-005)
R-6.6.4.1-XXX User regroup
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup: R-6.15.5.2-014 |
+| [R-6.4.5-004] | The FRMCS System shall be able to forward the railway emergency alert to new FRMCS User(s) within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). | A&T | N/A | See section 12.10 below
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup: R-6.15.5.2-008 |
+| [R-6.4.5-005] | Void. | | | |
+| [R-6.4.5-006] | The FRMCS System shall be able to forward additional information (e.g., text, voice prompts) in the railway emergency alert to new FRMCS Users. | A | 22.280 | [R-5.2.2-014] |
+| [R-6.4.5-007] | For railway emergency alert the application layer priority of the communication shall be managed by the prioritisation application. | A | 22.280 | 5.4.2-XXX
5.6.X, 6.8.7.X
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup: R-6.15.5.2-008 |
+| [R-6.4.5-008] | The FRMCS System shall be able to prevent new FRMCS User(s), other than a Controller, involved in an ongoing railway emergency alert, to receive an additional railway emergency alert. In this case when the ongoing railway emergency alert has ended the FRMCS System shall forward the railway emergency alert to the new FRMCS User. | A | 22.280 | 5.4.2-XXX
[R-5.4.2-007a] |
+
+| | | | | |
+|---------------|-------|--|--|--|
+| [R-6.4.5-009] | Void. | | | |
+|---------------|-------|--|--|--|
+
+## 6.4.5a Use case: Merging of Railway Emergency Alerts
+
+### 6.4.5a.1 Description
+
+An authorized FRMCS User (i.e., Controller) or an External System (e.g., Traffic Management System or Train Tracking System) is able to merge two or more existing Railway Emergency Alerts. The merging may result in changed alert conditions. The affected FRMCS Users are notified.
+
+### 6.4.5a.2 Pre-conditions
+
+An FRMCS User (i.e., Controller) is authorized to merge Railway Emergency Alerts. There are two or more ongoing Railway Emergency Alerts. FRMCS Users involved in those alerts have been regrouped into separate temporary groups for use during the alerts.
+
+### 6.4.5a.3 Service flows
+
+It has been determined that the alert area must be extended to include users involved in the ongoing alerts.
+
+An authorized FRMCS User (i.e., Controller) or an External System is able to provide the FRMCS System with changed alert conditions (e.g., extension of the area or combination of track sections) including selection of the appropriate recipients of the new (i.e., merged) Railway Emergency Alert. The FRMCS Users involved in the new/merged alert are regrouped into a new temporary group.
+
+The alert condition is declared by the Controller, or authorized FRMCS User, on this new temporary group. The FRMCS system sends the new/merged Railway Emergency Alert to all FRMCS Users in the new temporary group within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). The alert notification can include all relevant information including details of the merged alerts, if needed, (e.g., text, voice prompts) which is forwarded to and presented on the end user device of the regrouped FRMCS Users.
+
+The FRMCS system continuously check's if FRMCS Users still meet the alert conditions of the Railway Emergency Alert. The FRMCS User can be, for example, a mobile user, a driver, maintenance staff, a member of a shunting team or a controller.
+
+The priority of the Railway Emergency Alert is managed by the arbitration application. The alert has the priority which matches the application category CRITICAL DATA (see 12.10).
+
+In the case that a mobile FRMCS User is already active in a Railway Emergency Alert, the new Railway Emergency Alert is sent by the FRMCS System to the end user device. The presentation of the alert(s) to the user is managed by the client arbitration application.
+
+In case that a mobile FRMCS User is already active in an ongoing Railway Emergency Voice and/or Data communications of another Railway Emergency Alert (i.e., call in progress), the ongoing Railway Emergency Voice and/or Data communications is terminated either using normal termination condition (e.g., an authorized user terminate the call) or using configuration parameters of the FRMCS System (e.g., timeout when latest transmission ends).
+
+When ongoing Railway Emergency Voice and/or Data communications of another Railway Emergency Alert are terminated, the next request to establish Railway Emergency Voice and/or Data communication is made on the associated merged Railway Emergency Alert (i.e., next call occurs on regroup group).
+
+If a Railway Emergency Voice and/or Data communication is established by the FRMCS User of an ongoing Railway Emergency Alert, any other ongoing non-emergency-voice communications are put in the queue.
+
+A FRMCS User - other than the initiating FRMCS User (i.e., Controller) - is not able to manually leave the temporary group of the new Railway Emergency Alert.
+
+The FRMCS system notifies the FRMCS Users for whom the Railway Emergency Alert is no longer applicable and terminates the alert of these FRMCS Users. The termination notification of the alert can include additional information (e.g., text, voice prompts) which is presented on the end user device of the FRMCS Users. These FRMCS Users are removed from the merged alert temporary group.
+
+In the case an FRMCS User no longer meets the conditions of the Railway Emergency Alert, but there is an ongoing Railway Emergency Voice or Data Communication, the FRMCS User will remain in the ongoing Railway Emergency Voice or Data communication.
+
+The initiating FRMCS User (i.e., Controller) is notified which FRMCS Users are still part of the Railway Emergency Alert. FRMCS Users who have left the Railway Emergency Alert are separately indicated to the initiating FRMCS User (i.e., Controller).
+
+The communication is recorded by the Data recording and access to recorded data application.
+
+#### 6.4.5a.4 Post-conditions
+
+The appropriate FRMCS Users remain in the temporary group of the merged Railway Emergency Alert, while non-appropriate FRMCS Users are returned to their previous condition.
+
+#### 6.4.5a.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+### 6.4.6 Use case: Leaving of the railway emergency alert
+
+#### 6.4.6.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS System shall continuously check if FRMCS Users do match to the condition of the railway emergency alert. If not, FRMCS System terminates the alert of the concerned FRMCS User.
+
+#### 6.4.6.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User is authorised to receive the railway emergency alert. This is managed by the application authorisation of application.
+
+There is an ongoing railway emergency alert.
+
+#### 6.4.6.3 Service flows
+
+##### Mobile FRMCS User
+
+The FRMCS System shall continuously check if FRMCS Users do match to the conditions of the railway emergency alert.
+
+The FRMCS System shall update the FRMCS Users for whom the railway emergency alert is no longer valid and terminates the alert of these FRMCS Users. The termination notification of the FRMCS System can include additional information (e.g. text, voice prompts) which are forwarded to the FRMCS User.
+
+A mobile FRMCS User, e.g. a Driver, maintenance staff or a member of a shunting team, is not able to leave or terminate the railway emergency alert.
+
+The priority of the railway emergency alert is managed by the prioritisation application. The alert has the priority which matches the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see 12.10) within the FRMCS-System
+
+In case a FRMCS User does not match to the conditions of the railway emergency alert and the particular FRMCS User is part of an ongoing railway emergency voice communication, the FRMCS User will remain in the ongoing railway emergency voice communication.
+
+The Controller is informed by the FRMCS System about the remaining FRMCS Users of the railway emergency alert. The applicable Controller is updated by the FRMCS System about the particular FRMCS Users which do not match to the conditions of the railway emergency alert.
+
+The communication is recorded by the Data recording and access to recorded data application.
+
+#### **Controller**
+
+An entitled Controller is able to leave the railway emergency alerts, unless the leaving Controller is the last Controller in the alert.
+
+The Controller also leaves the ongoing railway emergency voice communication.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment of a Controller shows multiple alerts when active.
+
+The communication is recorded by the Data recording and access to recorded data application.
+
+#### **6.4.6.4 Post-conditions**
+
+The appropriate recipients are still alerted, while non-appropriate recipients are not alerted anymore.
+
+## 6.4.6.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.4.6-001] | The FRMCS System shall continuously check if FRMCS Users do not match the conditions of the railway emergency alert anymore. The FRMCS System shall withdraw the alert from those FRMCS Users who do not match the conditions anymore and inform them and the initiating Driver and Controller(s) accordingly. | A | 22.280 | R-5.3-XXX
R-5.6.2.4.1-004
R-6.8.8.4.1-006 (Using User regroup, not 5.6.2.4.1-005)
R-6.6.4.1-XXX User regroup
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup:
R-6.15.5.2-014 |
+| [R-6.4.6-002] | The FRMCS System shall provide all applicable alerts to a Controller independent of whether involved in another alert or not to allow the Controllers to switch between different alerts | A | 22.280 | 5.1.2, 5.1.5, 5.4.2, 6.8.8.4.1-005 |
+| [R-6.4.6-003] | The FRMCS System shall be able to ensure that at least one Controller is always involved in the railway emergency alert.
Note: The FRMCS will prevent other FRMCS User, e.g. Drivers, maintenance staff or members of a shunting team, to leave railway emergency alert. | A | 22.280 | [R-6.6.4.2-002a/b]
6.4.6.1-002/003
R-6.4.4-003, R-6.4.4-004
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup:
not covered |
+
+## 6.4.7 Use case: Termination of the railway emergency alert
+
+### 6.4.7.1 Description
+
+The Controller is able to terminate the railway emergency alert.
+
+### 6.4.7.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The Controller is authorised to terminate the railway emergency alert.
+
+There is an ongoing railway emergency alert.
+
+### 6.4.7.3 Service flows
+
+The Controller terminates the railway emergency alert. A mobile FRMCS User, e.g. a Driver, maintenance staff or a member of a shunting team, is not able to terminate the railway emergency alert via actions on the end user device.
+
+Based on the alert termination request, FRMCS System forwards a termination notification to all FRMCS Users involved in the railway emergency alert. The alert termination notification can include additional information (e.g. text, voice prompts) which are forwarded by the FRMCS System presented on the FRMCS User.
+
+The priority of the termination of the railway emergency alert is managed by the prioritisation application. The termination of the alert has the priority which matches the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see 12.10) within the FRMCS System.
+
+When the Controller terminated the railway emergency alert, in the case of manual initiation of railway emergency voice communication, the related ongoing railway emergency voice communication remains unaffected. On the FRMCS Equipment this can be a separate action for the Controller or can be triggered as a combined action with the termination of the alert.
+
+The communication is recorded by the Data recording and access to recorded data application.
+
+#### 6.4.7.4 Post-conditions
+
+The railway emergency alert is terminated.
+
+#### 6.4.7.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------|
+| [R-6.4.7-001] | The FRMCS System shall only allow a Controller to terminate the railway emergency alert. | A | 22.280 | R-6.8.8.4.2-XXX |
+| [R-6.4.7-002] | The FRMCS System shall notify the FRMCS Users of the terminated railway emergency alert.
The FRMCS System shall be able to forward additional information (e.g. text, voice prompts) as part of the alert termination. | A | 22.282 | R-5.6.2.4.2-003
R-5.2.2-014 |
+
+### 6.4.8 Use case: Initiation of railway emergency voice communication
+
+#### 6.4.8.1 Description
+
+Based on operational rules, additional information about the emergency can be exchanged using voice communication. E.g. the initiator of the railway emergency voice communication may inform other involved FRMCS Users about the emergency.
+
+Railway emergency voice communication is based on on-net communication.
+
+#### 6.4.8.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The railway emergency alert is active.
+
+#### 6.4.8.3 Service flows
+
+##### Automatic initiation of Emergency Voice Communication
+
+Upon activation of the railway emergency alert, the FRMCS System automatically initiates voice communication.
+
+FRMCS Users that are part of an active railway emergency alert shall be included in the voice communication.
+
+The railway emergency voice communication does not interrupt the railway emergency, but is able to pre-empt any other ongoing voice communication.
+
+The FRMCS System establishes the railway emergency voice communication within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). The information from the Role management and presence application is used to present the identities to the FRMCS Users involved in the communication.
+
+The location of the initiator of the railway emergency voice communication is forwarded and presented to the Controller. The necessary location information is retrieved from the location services application.
+
+Multiuser talker control application is used in railway emergency voice communication.
+
+The precedence handling of the incoming railway emergency voice communication for the FRMCS User is managed by the prioritisation application. The railway emergency voice communication has the priority which matches the application category of CRITICAL VOICE (see 12.10) within the FRMCS System.
+
+The communication is recorded by the FRMCS System voice recording and access to recorded data application.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment of a Controller shows multiple railway emergency voice communications when active.
+
+#### **Manual initiation of Emergency Voice Communication**
+
+Any FRMCS User having an active railway emergency alert shall be able to initiate voice communication by a simple user action.
+
+All the users receiving the active railway emergency alert shall be included in the voice communication.
+
+The railway emergency voice communication shall not interrupt the railway emergency alert but shall pre-empt any other ongoing voice communication.
+
+The FRMCS System establishes the railway emergency voice communication within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). The information from the Role management and presence application is used to forward the identities to the FRMCS Users involved in communication.
+
+The location of the initiator of the railway emergency voice communication is forwarded to the Controller. The location information is retrieved from the location services application.
+
+The multiuser talker control application is used in railway emergency voice communication.
+
+The handling of the incoming railway emergency voice communication for both the Controllers and mobile FRMCS Users is managed by the prioritisation application. The railway emergency voice communication has the priority which matches the application category of CRITICAL VOICE (see 12.10) within the FRMCS System.
+
+The communication is recorded by the FRMCS System voice recording and access to recorded data application.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment of a Controller shows multiple railway emergency voice communications when active.
+
+#### **6.4.8.4 Post-conditions**
+
+The railway emergency voice communication is active.
+
+#### 6.4.8.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.4.8-001] | Following a railway emergency alert the FRMCS System shall be able to automatically initiate a railway emergency voice communication. | A | 22.282 | R-5.6.2.4.1-013 |
+| [R-6.4.8-002] | The railway emergency voice communication does not interrupt the railway emergency, but is able to pre-empt any other ongoing voice communication. | A | N/A | Can be achieved by proper priority configuration further alert and (voice) communication do not compete for the same user interface resources |
+| [R-6.4.8-003] | The FRMCS System shall also be able to initiate a railway emergency voice communication on manual request by FRMCS Users e.g. Controllers and External Systems | A | 22.280 | R-5.6.2.2.1-XXX |
+| [R-6.4.8-004] | To determine which FRMCS Users have to be included in the communication the FRMCS System shall apply the mechanism as defined in [R-6.4.3-003] | N/A | 22.280 | R-5.6.2.1.2-002
R-5.6.2.4.1-004
R-6.8.8.4.1-006
(Using User regroup, not 5.6.2.4.1-005)
R-6.6.4.1-XXX User regroup
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup: R-6.15.5.2-001 & R-6.15.5.2-014 |
+| [R-6.4.8-005] | The FRMCS System shall be able to establish the railway emergency voice communication within a time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). | A | N/A | See section 12.10 below
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup: R-6.15.5.2-008 |
+| [R-6.4.8-006] | For railway emergency voice communication the application layer priority of the communication shall be managed by the prioritisation application. | A | 22.280 | 5.4.2-XXX
5.6.X, 6.8.7.X
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup: R-6.15.5.2-008 |
+| [R-6.4.8-007] | The location of the initiator of the railway emergency voice communication is forwarded and presented to the Controller. | A | 22.280 | 5.11 001, 008, 015
6.12 001,006,007
6.4.5 001, 003, 004 |
+| [R-6.4.8-008] | The FRMCS System shall be able to mutually forward and continuously update the location of all FRMCS Users involved in a railway emergency voice communication. | A | 22.280 | 5.11 007, 009, 013
6.12 006 |
+| [R-6.4.8-009] | For railway emergency voice communication the FRMCS | A | 22.179 | 6.2.3.7.2-XXX |
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------|
+| | System shall apply multiuser talker control (See "9.7 Multiuser talker control related use cases"). | | | |
+| [R-6.4.8-010] | The FRMCS Equipment of a Controller shows multiple railway emergency voice communications when active. | | 22.280 | 5.4.2-XXX
[R-5.4.2-007a] |
+| [R-6.4.8-011] | The FRMCS System shall be able to make available the content and communication related data of the railway emergency voice communication for recording purposes. | A | 22.280 | 6.15.4-001 - 010 |
+
+## 6.4.9 Use case: Termination of railway emergency voice communication
+
+### 6.4.9.1 Description
+
+Only the Controller(s) shall be able to put on hold, leave or terminate the railway emergency voice communication.
+
+### 6.4.9.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The railway emergency voice communication is ongoing.
+
+### 6.4.9.3 Service flows
+
+In the case a user no longer meets the conditions of the railway emergency alert and if there is an ongoing railway emergency voice communication, the user will remain in the ongoing railway emergency voice communication.
+
+#### Controller on hold
+
+A Controller is able to put the railway emergency voice communication on hold.
+
+After the Controller has put the railway emergency voice communication on hold, the communication remains active in the FRMCS System. The Controller is able to revert back to the communication again.
+
+#### Controller leaving
+
+An entitled Controller is able to leave the railway emergency voice communication unless the leaving Controller is the last Controller involved in the railway emergency voice communication.
+
+#### Controller termination
+
+An entitled Controller is able to terminate the railway emergency voice communication.
+
+After termination request by the entitled Controller, FRMCS System terminates the railway emergency voice communication. All involved FRMCS Users are informed about the termination.
+
+### 6.4.9.4 Post-conditions
+
+A Controller has left, put on hold or terminated the railway emergency voice communication.
+
+## 6.4.9.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.4.9-001] | In the case a FRMCS User no longer meets the conditions of railway emergency voice communication, the user shall be removed from the ongoing railway emergency voice communication. | A | 22.280 | R-5.3-XXX
R-5.6.2.4.1-004
R-6.8.8.4.1-006 (Using User regroup, not 5.6.2.4.1-005)
R-6.6.4.1-XXX User regroup
MCX service Ad hoc Group Communication as an alternative to User regroup:
R-6.15.5.2-014 |
+| [R-6.4.9-002] | For a railway emergency voice communication only a Controller shall be able to put the voice communication on hold. The voice communication between the remaining users shall not be affected by a Controller putting the railway emergency voice communication on hold. The Controller is able to take up the communication again. All involved users are informed. | A | 22.280 | 5.4.1, 5.4.2, 5.1.5
6.4.4-003, 6.4.4-004 |
+| [R-6.4.9-003] | For a railway emergency voice communication only a Controller shall be able to leave the communication unless the leaving Controller is the last Controller involved in the railway emergency voice communication. All involved users are informed. | A | 22.280 | 6.4.4 002; 6.4.5 001; 5.1.5 003-008
6.4.4-003, 6.4.4-004 |
+| [R-6.4.9-004] | For a Railway emergency voice communication only a Controller shall be able to terminate the communication. All involved users are informed. | A | 22.280 | R-6.8.8.4.2-XXX |
+
+## 6.4.10 Use case: Initiation of Data communication during railway emergency alert
+
+### 6.4.10.1 Description
+
+Based on operational rules, additional information about the emergency can be exchanged using data communication. A system or a user is able to send the additional information (e.g. text, voice prompts).
+
+### 6.4.10.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The railway emergency alert is active.
+
+### 6.4.10.3 Service flows
+
+A FRMCS User, Controller or an External System is able to send additional information (e.g. text, voice prompts).
+
+All the FRMCS Users shall receive the additional information.
+
+The FRMCS System establishes the data communication within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). The information from the Role management and presence application is used to present the identities to the users involved in communication.
+
+The location of the initiator of the data communication is presented to a mobile FRMCS User, Controller or to an External System. The location information is retrieved from the location services application.
+
+The handling of the incoming data communication is managed by the prioritisation application. The alert has the priority which matches the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see 12.10) within the FRMCS System.
+
+It shall be possible to receive data communication during railway emergency voice communication.
+
+In the case of an ongoing Data communication during railway emergency alert, the additional user is added to the ongoing Data communication during railway emergency alert.
+
+The communication is recorded by the FRMCS System Data recording and access to recorded data application.
+
+### 6.4.10.4 Post-conditions
+
+Data communication is initiated.
+
+### 6.4.10.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+Independently on any actions between the user and the end user device, the additional information provided by data communication is presented to the user.
+
+The user shall be able to send additional information by data communication using simple user actions e.g. by selecting predefined messages.
+
+## 6.4.9.10 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.4.10-001] | The FRMCS System shall allow a FRMCS User, Controller or an External System to send additional information (e.g. text, voice prompts) to FRMCS Users involved in a railway emergency alert or railway emergency voice communication. | A | 22.282 | R-5.2.2-014 |
+| [R-6.4.10-002] | The FRMCS System shall be able to deliver the additional data to a railway emergency alert or railway emergency voice communication within a time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). | A | N/A | See section 12.10 below |
+| [R-6.4.10-003] | The location of the initiator of the data communication shall be presented to all participants in the railway emergency alert or railway emergency voice communication. | A | 22.280 | 5.11 001, 008, 015
6.12 001,006,007
6.4.5 001, 003, 004 |
+| [R-6.4.10-004] | For railway emergency alert /railway emergency voice communication the application layer priority of the communication shall be managed by the prioritisation application. | A | 22.280 | 5.4.2-XXX
5.6.X, 6.8.7.X |
+| [R-6.4.10-005] | The FRMCS System shall be able to make available the content and communication related data of the railway emergency data communication for recording purposes. | A | 22.280 | 6.15.4-001 - 010 |
+
+## 6.4.11 Use case: Service interworking and service continuation with GSM-R
+
+### 6.4.11.1 Description
+
+For migration purposes, the service interworking and service continuation between the GSM-R system and FRMCS System for railway emergency alerts and railway emergency voice communication needs to be defined.
+
+Service interworking between FRMCS and GSM-R shall not require any changes in the GSM-R system specifications.
+
+Depending on the migration scenario, a Controller can be attached to the FRMCS System, to the GSM-R system or both. The mobile FRMCS User can be attached either to the GSM-R system or to the FRMCS System.
+
+The service continuation use cases only apply where a FRMCS Equipment and a GSM-R UE are linked together.
+
+#### 6.4.11.2 Pre-conditions
+
+None.
+
+#### 6.4.11.3 Service flows
+
+##### **Mobile FRMCS User attached to GSM-R**
+
+When the mobile FRMCS User is attached to the GSM-R system and is initiating a Railway Emergency Call, the GSM-R system, (in parallel to processing the railway emergency call internally according to GSM-R definitions), routes the Railway Emergency Call to the FRMCS System, which requires the FRMCS System to be reachable by identities that are understood by the GSM-R system. The FRMCS System will determine, based on configuration, if a railway emergency alert needs to be established. If a railway emergency alert is established a railway emergency voice communication is initiated automatically.
+
+The Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system and the railway emergency voice communication in the FRMCS System are linked together and controlled by the FRMCS System.
+
+Service interworking between the talker control in the GSM-R system and the FRMCS System is required, but without changing the GSM-R system.
+
+When the Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system is terminated, the railway emergency alert and the railway emergency voice communication in the FRMCS System is terminated too.
+
+When the railway emergency voice communication in the FRMCS System is terminated and there is a Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system linked together, Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system and railway emergency alert / the Railway emergency voice communication in the FRMCS System are terminated too.
+
+When the railway emergency alert in the FRMCS System is terminated and there is a railway emergency Call in the GSM-R system connected, both the Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system and Railway emergency voice communication in the FRMCS System are not terminated.
+
+The information from the Role management and presence application is used to forward the identities between the systems. The identity of the initiator of the Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system is made available to the FRMCS System.
+
+##### **Mobile FRMCS User attached to FRMCS**
+
+When the FRMCS User is attached to the FRMCS System and is initiating a railway emergency alert, and the railway emergency alert is also relevant for the GSM-R system based on configuration, the railway emergency voice communication becomes initiated in the FRMCS System and as railway emergency Call in the GSM-R system.
+
+The railway emergency voice communication in the FRMCS System and Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system are linked and controlled by the FRMCS System.
+
+Service interworking between the talker control in the FRMCS System and the GSM-R system is required, but without changing the GSM-R system.
+
+When the railway emergency voice communication in the FRMCS System is terminated and there is a railway emergency Call in the GSM-R system linked, railway emergency Call in the GSM-R system and Railway emergency alert / the Railway emergency voice communication in the FRMCS System are also terminated.
+
+When the railway emergency alert in the FRMCS System is terminated and there is a linked Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system, both the Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system and railway emergency voice communication in the FRMCS System remain active.
+
+When the Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system is terminated, the railway emergency alert and the railway emergency voice communication in the FRMCS System is terminated.
+
+The information from the Role management and presence application is used to forward the identities between FRMCS System and GSM-R system. The identity of the initiator of the railway emergency alert in the FRMCS System is made available to the GSM-R system to be used accordingly.
+
+#### **Mobile FRMCS User moving from GSM-R to FRMCS**
+
+When the GSM-R system becomes unavailable e.g. lack of coverage, the FRMCS Equipment should provide service continuation by setting up the communication via the FRMCS System. An interruption of voice communication is acceptable. It is up to the end user device implementation how this service continuation is as seamless as possible presented to the user.
+
+#### **Mobile FRMCS User moving from FRMCS to GSM-R**
+
+When the FRMCS radio access becomes unavailable, the FRMCS Equipment shall able to provide service continuation by setting up the communication via the GSM-R system. An interruption of voice communication is acceptable. It is up to the end user device implementation how this service continuation is as seamless as possible presented to the user.
+
+Note: Both scenarios described above only apply when a FRMCS Equipment and a GSM-R UE are linked together. It is further assumed the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS Equipment to have some control of the GSM-R UE.
+
+#### **6.4.11.4 Post-conditions**
+
+None.
+
+#### 6.4.11.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.4.11-001] | The FRMCS System shall provide the necessary means to allow FRMCS Users to be reachable from a legacy GSM-R system. Interworking between FRMCS and GSM-R should not require any changes on GSM-R network side | A/T | 22.179 | Covered in 6.18.4.2 |
+| [R-6.4.11-002] | The FRMCS System shall provide the necessary means to FRMCS Users to set up a railway emergency alert and / or railway emergency voice communication also to users in the legacy GSM-R system. Interworking between FRMCS and GSM-R should not require any changes on GSM-R system. | A | 22.179 | Partially covered in 6.18.4.2. Voice is covered, Alert not, as there is no Emergency alert functionality available in GSM-R. |
+| [R-6.4.11-003] | In case of overlapping GSM-R and FRMCS serving the same geographical area the FRMCS System shall update GSM-R about ongoing Railway Emergency Communication/railway emergency alert in the FRMCS System.
Note: To allow the FRMCS System to be updated of Railway Emergency Communication initiated in the GSM-R needs to be configured accordingly. | A | 22.179 | Basic functionality covered by 6.18.4.2. However, the areas in FRMCS and GSM-R will not exactly match, due to the fact that the capabilities wrt, to granularity of location in the two systems are different. |
+| [R-6.4.11-004] | The FRMCS System shall provide service interworking between the talker control in the GSM-R system and the FRMCS System without changing the GSM-R system. | A | N/A | Based on latest decisions in ETSI-RT, there will be no interaction of talker control between the systems. As a consequence, only two related requirements on unmute/mute remain on the IWF |
+| [R-6.4.11-005] | When the Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system is terminated, the linked railway emergency alert and the railway emergency voice communication in the FRMCS System shall also be terminated. | A | 22.179 | Covered in 6.18.4.2 |
+| [R-6.4.11-006] | When the railway emergency voice communication in the FRMCS System is terminated and there is a linked Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system, the Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R | A | 22.179 | Covered in 6.18.4.2 |
+
+| | | | | |
+|--|----------------------------------|--|--|--|
+| | system shall also be terminated. | | | |
+|--|----------------------------------|--|--|--|
+
+| | | | | |
+|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.4.11-007] | When the railway emergency alert in the FRMCS System is terminated and there is a Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system linked, the Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system shall not be terminated. | A | N/A | No I/W between FRMCS emergency alert and GSM-R voice communication. Therefore, requirement becomes obsolete. |
+| [R-6.4.11-008] | When the Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system is terminated, the railway emergency alert and the railway emergency voice communication in the FRMCS System shall be terminated. | A | N/A | Voice communications gets terminated. No I/W between FRMCS emergency alert and GSM-R voice communication. Therefore, that part becomes obsolete |
+| [R-6.4.11-009] | The information from the Role management and presence application of the FRMCS System shall be used to identify and address GSM-R users to be included in the railway emergency alert /railway emergency voice communication. | A | N/A | Approach has changed now, linked calls are used instead. |
+| [R-6.4.11-010] | The identity of the initiator of a Railway Emergency Call in the GSM-R system shall be presented to the FRMCS Users involved in that railway emergency voice communication. | A | TS 22.179 | Covered for on-network: [R-6.18.4.2-003] |
+| [R-6.4.11-011] | For a Railway Emergency Call, when the GSM-R system becomes unavailable, e.g. due to coverage problems, the FRMCS Equipment, if capable of making use of the FRMCS System shall be able to reconnect to the railway emergency alert and, if applicable, the railway emergency voice communication on the FRMCS System. An interruption of voice communication is acceptable.
Note 1: This use case only applies when a FRMCS Equipment and a GSM-R UE are linked together. It is further assumed the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS Equipment to have some control of the GSM-R UE. | A | 22.280 | Communication aspect covered by 6.6.4.1.2 and 6.6.5.2 |
+| [R-6.4.11-012] | For railway emergency alert / | A | | Covered by GSM-R late entry |
+
+| | | | | |
+|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|
+| | railway emergency voice communication, when the FRMCS System becomes unavailable, e.g. due to coverage problems, the end user device, if capable of making use of legacy GSM-R shall be able to reconnect to the railway emergency voice communication via GSM-R. An interruption of voice communication is acceptable.
Note 2: This use case only applies when a FRMCS Equipment and a GSM-R UE are linked together. It is further assumed the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS Equipment to have some control of the GSM-R UE.
| | | |
+|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|
+
+## 6.4.12 Use case: Interface to train borne recorder
+
+### 6.4.12.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS Equipment shall provide information about railway emergency communication to the train borne recorder or other equipment via a dedicated interface.
+
+### 6.4.12.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS Equipment is switched on.
+
+### 6.4.12.3 Service flows
+
+The following events on the FRMCS Equipment related to the railway emergency communication is provided to the train borne recorder:
+
+- Initiation of the railway emergency alert
+- Reception of the railway emergency alert
+- Leaving of the railway emergency alert
+- Termination of the railway emergency alert
+- Initiation of railway emergency voice communication
+- Termination of railway emergency voice communication
+
+### 6.4.12.4 Post-conditions
+
+User actions related to the railway emergency communication have been provided to the train borne recorder.
+
+## 6.4.12.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.4.12-001] | FRMCS Equipment shall provide a dedicated interface for train borne recording purposes | A | N/A | Interface for train borne recorder is outside scope of 3GPP. |
+| [R-6.4.12-002] | FRMCS Equipment shall provide following information to the train borne recorder: - • Initiation of the railway emergency alert
- • Reception of the railway emergency alert
- • Leaving of the railway emergency alert
- • Termination of the railway emergency alert
- • Initiation of railway emergency voice communication
- • Termination of railway emergency voice communication
| A | TS 22.280 | Covered for on-network: [R-6.15.4-004] [R-6.15.4-007] [R-6.15.4-008]
Not applicable to off-network (see table C-1). |
+
+## 6.5 Use case: Automatic Train Protection (ATP) support by the FRMCS System
+
+### 6.5.1 Description
+
+For Automatic Train Protection (ATP) the train transmits its information (such as current location, current speed, etc.) to a radio block centre (RBC). As soon as a connection has been established between a train, a radio block centre and a train centre, the train sends its position and speed information periodically. The RBC uses the received information to decide movement authority of the train.
+
+### 6.5.2 Pre-conditions
+
+It is assumed the current position of the train and its speed is provided by the Location Service as defined in 9.4.
+
+It is assumed that there is a bearer of suitable QoS established between the train the radio block centre and the train control centre.
+
+### 6.5.3 Service flows
+
+Via the bearer of suitable QoS the train provides its related information, e.g. train number, location, to the RBC. Via this bearer the train can request movement authority from the RBC and the RBC can grant this to the train.
+
+## 6.5.4 Post-conditions
+
+A train Driver controls the speed of the train according to movement authority.
+
+## 6.5.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------|----------------|
+| [R-6.5-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to provide the necessary QoS for a data bearer to be used for the Automatic Train Protection (ATP) used for e.g. movement authority messages or emergency brake messages. | A/T | TS 22.282 (MCData) | Sub-clause 5.5 |
+
+# 6.6 Trackside Maintenance Warning System communication related use cases
+
+## 6.6.1 Introduction
+
+Generally, trackside maintenance occur during daily train operation. For safety reasons trackside maintenance staff need to be informed about approaching trains entering the area of maintenance. Thus, the intention of a trackside warning system is to inform trackside staff about the approaching train.
+
+Trackside warning system consists of several specific sensors and warning entities. The sensors are responsible to detect the approaching train and warning entities indicate trackside workers about the approaching train. A warning entity provides this indication in form of visual signal e.g. flashing light and an audio signal e.g. tone. In addition, the local maintenance staff will receive the train approaching indication on its FRMCS Equipment. When the train has left the track section, the warning system withdraws the indication.
+
+Sensors and warning entities constitute the warning system that requires continuous communication between the sensors and the warning entities. In addition, it encompasses the communication among the warning system and the FRMCS Equipment of the local maintenance staff.
+
+Due to the fact that such a warning system deployment is temporary and not always fixed network communication facilities are available at the track, FRMCS System provides necessary mobile communication services for the trackside warning system.
+
+Hence this chapter describes the use cases related to Trackside Maintenance Warning System communication. The following use cases are identified:
+
+- Initiation of a Trackside Maintenance Warning System communication
+- Termination of a Trackside Maintenance Warning System communication
+
+## 6.6.2 Use case: Initiation of a trackside maintenance warning system communication
+
+### 6.6.2.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS User (sensors of the warning system entity) shall be able to initiate data communication to the FRMCS Equipment of trackside maintenance staff and/or trackside warning indication entities (FRMCS User) in the applicable area/track.
+
+When a train approaches that FRMCS User (FRMCS Equipment of the trackside maintenance staff) and/or the warning indication entities of the warning system get notified.
+
+### 6.6.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS Users as part of the warning system and the FRMCS Users as part of the maintenance crew are authorised to initiate the trackside maintenance warning system communication.
+
+### 6.6.2.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS Users (trackside maintenance warning system) and FRMCS User (trackside workers in the applicable area) initiate the trackside maintenance warning system communication to the receiving side.
+
+A secure data communication application is used for the trackside maintenance warning system communication. The communication requests the QoS class which matches the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see QoS section 12.10) within the FRMCS System.
+
+The arbitration is managed by the arbitration application.
+
+The communication is recorded by the Data recording application.
+
+### 6.6.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The FRMCS Users are part of the (warning system) communication are able to exchange data.
+
+## 6.6.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.6.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to initiate data communication for Trackside Maintenance Warning System to FRMCS Users upon a request from a functional identity entitled to raise such communication. | A | 22.282 | Covered by R-5.2.2-XXX, 5.3.2-XXX, , R-5.4.2-XXX, 5.5.2-XXX |
+| [R-6.6.2-002] | For Trackside Maintenance Warning System the FRMCS System shall provide QoS, priority and communication setup time as defined in [Reference to QoS section 12.10]. | A | N/A | See section 12.10 below |
+| [R-6.6.2-003] | The FRMCS System shall be able to select FRMCS users to deliver the Trackside Maintenance Warning to base on their functional identity and their location. | A | 22.280 | Covered by [R-6.6.4.2-002a], [R-6.6.5.2-007] ] |
+
+## 6.6.3 Use case: Termination of a trackside maintenance warning system communication
+
+### 6.6.3.1 Description
+
+FRMCS Users are able to terminate data communication.
+
+### 6.6.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The data (trackside maintenance warning system) communication is ongoing.
+
+### 6.6.3.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS User terminates the trackside maintenance warning system communication with the receiving trackside worker applications.
+
+### 6.6.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The data communication has been released disconnected.
+
+### 6.6.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.6.3-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to terminate the Trackside Maintenance Warning System data communication upon a request received from the functional identity that initiated the Trackside Maintenance Warning System data communication. | A | 22.282 | Covered by [R-6.2.3-001], [R-6.2.3-013] |
+
+## 6.7 Pushed Real Time Video streaming
+
+### 6.7.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to real time video streaming are described, the following use cases are identified
+
+- Initiation of a real time video streaming
+- Termination of a real time video streaming
+
+### 6.7.2 Description
+
+The video image quality depends on the application needs, e.g. lip reading, pattern detection.
+
+Video based supervision for rail operational purposes requires also the support of Real time video capabilities from the FRMCS System. Multiple recipients are able to use the real time video for different purposes.
+
+The FRMCS Users in this case are applications both onboard of the train and on the ground, for example FRMCS Users in a train control center.
+
+For real time video streaming, both video and audio information are combined.
+
+### 6.7.3 Use case: Initiation of a real time video streaming
+
+#### 6.7.3.1 Description
+
+Video is streamed between FRMCS Users or FRMCS Equipment.
+
+#### 6.7.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The streaming FRMCS User or FRMCS Equipment has registered to a functional identity that is authorised to initiate a real time video stream.
+
+Note: Successful registration of a functional identity authorised to stream video implies the FRMCS Equipment is able to support streaming video (e.g. camera available)
+
+The receiving FRMCS User or FRMCS Equipment has registered to a functional identity that is authorised to receive a real time video stream.
+
+Note: Successful registration of a functional identity authorised to receive streaming video implies the FRMCS Equipment is able to support streaming video (e.g. monitor or recording device available)
+
+### 6.7.3.3 Service flows
+
+The initiating FRMCS User requests a real time video streaming to another FRMCS User.
+
+The video streaming requests the QoS class which matches to the application category of VIDEO or CRITICAL VIDEO within the FRMCS System, depending on the application needs.
+
+The video quality requested to the FRMCS System by the FRMCS User is checked by the FRMCS Application.
+
+If the requested quality can be reached, the FRMCS System establishes the real time video data communication with a setup time specified as NORMAL (see 12.12).
+
+If the requested quality cannot be reached, the FRMCS Application or the FRMCS User can decide to stop the request or to continue the setup of video streaming with a lower video quality, depending on the application needs.
+
+During the real time video streaming the FRMCS Application constantly monitors the quality. If the delivered quality of the real time video data communication changes, the FRMCS Application or the FRMCS User is informed about the change. The FRMCS Application or the FRMCS User may decide to change the quality of the real time video streaming, depending on the applications needs.
+
+If authorized, the real time video communication is recorded by the data recording and access to recorded data application.
+
+The arbitration is managed by the arbitration application.
+
+### 6.7.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+Depending on the QoS offered, the FRMCS Application or a FRMCS User decide if video streaming is set up.
+
+### 6.7.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.7.3-001] | Depending on the information associated with the functional identity used by the initiator, the FRMCS System shall setup the real time video streaming to one or more FRMCS User(s) identified by functional identities that are able and authorised to receive streaming video. | A | TS 22.281 (MCVideo) | Functional identities covered under User identities in 4.7 |
+| [R-6.7.3-002] | Real time video streaming requests shall be set up by the FRMCS System with a QoS, priority and setup time as defined in [Reference to QoS section 12.10]. | A | TS 22.281 (MCVideo) | Priority covered under Imminent Peril and Emergency cases. Corresponds to Critical Video |
+
+## 6.7.4 Use case: Termination of a real time video communication
+
+### 6.7.4.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS User is able to terminate a real time video communication.
+
+### 6.7.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+There is an ongoing real time video data communication.
+
+### 6.7.4.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS Applications or FRMCS Users involved terminate the real time video data communication.
+
+### 6.7.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+The real time video data communication is terminated. The FRMCS Application or the FRMCS User is informed about the termination.
+
+### 6.7.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.7.4-001] | Upon request from the streaming or receiving FRMCS User, the FRMCS System shall be able to terminate the real time video streaming. | A | TS 22.281 (MCVideo) | This is covered in requirement R-5.2.8-001 clause 5.2.8. |
+
+## 6.8 Public emergency call related use cases
+
+### 6.8.1 Introduction
+
+FRMCS Users have to indicate events that endanger public safety or emergency that requires the public safety involvement. For this reason, the FRMCS System is able to route the emergency call based on the current position of the initiating FRMCS User. The initiation of an emergency call has no dependency on the registration status of the FRMCS User.
+
+Depending on the national rules, the operator of the FRMCS System may decide if the routing of the public emergency numbers is supported.
+
+Following use cases related to public emergency call handling has been identified.
+
+- Initiation of a public emergency call
+- Termination of a public emergency call
+- Call back the public emergency call initiator
+
+## 6.8.2 Use case: Initiation of a public emergency call
+
+### 6.8.2.1 Description
+
+If enabled by the FRMCS System, an FRMCS User is able to report an emergency to an officer of the Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) that will be responsible of bringing assistance or organizing response. The second scenario addresses the call back of a PSAP officer to the originator of the public emergency call which is a FRMCS User.
+
+### 6.8.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The underlying transport of the FRMCS System supports emergency calls and the FRMCS System allows FRMCS Users to make use of emergency calls.
+
+### 6.8.2.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS User or a public user initiates the public emergency call voice communication by dialling a public emergency call number.
+
+The voice communication is recorded by the voice recording and access application.
+
+The arbitration is managed by the arbitration application.
+
+### 6.8.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The PSAP officer has received the public emergency call.
+
+### 6.8.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.8.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to allow or inhibit the processing of public emergency numbers. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 sub-clause 6.16 Requirement [R-6.16-001] |
+| [R-6.8.2-002] | In case public emergency call setup is allowed, the 3GPP defined handling of public emergency calls shall be applied. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 sub-clause 6.16 Requirement [R-6.16-001] |
+
+## 6.8.3 Use case: Termination of a public emergency call
+
+### 6.8.3.1 Description
+
+Both the initiating user, FRMCS User or a public user, and the PSAP officer shall be able to terminate the public emergency call voice communication.
+
+The PSAP officer shall be able to put on hold the public emergency communication.
+
+### 6.8.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The public emergency call is ongoing.
+
+### 6.8.3.3 Service flows
+
+#### PSAP officer on hold
+
+A PSAP officer shall be able to put the public emergency call on hold.
+
+After the PSAP officer has put the voice communication on hold, the communication remains in the FRMCS System, and the PSAP officer is able to be part of the communication again.
+
+#### Termination
+
+The FRMCS User or a public user, and/or the PSAP officer shall be able to terminate the public emergency call.
+
+The FRMCS System terminates the voice communication. All involved users are informed.
+
+### 6.8.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The public emergency call voice communication is terminated.
+
+### 6.8.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------|
+| | No requirements.
Note: Procedures for normal emergency call behaviour applies if a call is allowed to be established. | | | |
+
+## 6.8.4 Use case: Call back the public emergency call initiator
+
+### 6.8.4.1 Description
+
+The PSAP officer shall be able to establish the communication towards the FRMCS user or a public user, who previously initiated the public emergency call (e.g. in the case the initial call was dropped).
+
+### 6.8.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The public emergency call initiator is reachable via FRMCS System or a public network.
+
+The FRMCS System is connected to the Public Safety Answering Point.
+
+### 6.8.4.3 Service flows
+
+The PSAP officer initiates the voice communication by using the subscriber identity or the device identity of the previous calling user, FRMCS User or a public user, of a public emergency call. The QoS class of the communication is managed by the QoS class application. The voice communication requests the QoS class which matches the application category of CRITICAL VOICE (see [QoS]) within the FRMCS System.
+
+The FRMCS System establishes the voice communication to the public emergency initiator within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see [QoS]).
+
+The arbitration is managed by the arbitration application.
+
+The voice communication is recorded by the voice recording and access application.
+
+#### 6.8.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+The call-back of the public emergency call is ongoing.
+
+#### 6.8.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------|
+| | No requirements.
Normal emergency call service behaviour applies if a call is allowed to be established. | | | |
+
+### 6.9 Data communication for possession management related use cases
+
+#### 6.9.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to possession management data communication are described, the following use cases are identified:
+
+- Initiation of a possession management data communication
+- Termination of a possession management data communication
+- Service interworking and service continuation with GSM-R
+
+#### 6.9.2 Use case: Initiation of a possession management data communication
+
+##### 6.9.2.1 Description
+
+The application supports the processes involved in taking possession of an area of railway infrastructure for engineering purposes (for example for track maintenance). This application is intended to allow track side workers to remotely take control of infrastructure elements to perform safe engineering works on those elements. The application provides the communication bearer in a safe and secure way. The possession management application is able to initiate, release data communication for possession related data of a certain track section.
+
+##### 6.9.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The initiator (Controller(s), trackside maintenance personnel, ground system) is authorised to initiate the possession management data communication.
+
+##### 6.9.2.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS Equipment initiates the possession management data communication towards the track possession management system.
+
+### 6.9.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The communication for possession management has been established.
+
+Application messages can be exchanged between the possession management application and the possession management system.
+
+### 6.9.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.9.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to support the transfer of messages to/from an authorised FRMCS Equipment identity, FRMCS User identity or functional identity with a QoS, priority and setup time as defined in clause 12.10 to/from an external system. | A | 22.280 | [R-5.9a-020] The MCX Service shall provide a mechanism for an MCX Service Administrator to configure for a particular functional alias, a set of functional aliases under the same authority to which a Private Communication (without Floor control) can be made by an MCX User registered to this particular functional alias.
[R-5.9a-021] The MCX Service shall provide a mechanism for an MCX Service Administrator to configure for a particular functional alias, a set of functional aliases under the same authority from which Private Communication (without Floor control) is allowed to an MCX User registered to this particular functional alias.
[R-5.9a-022] For private calls to functional aliases the authorizations in clause 5.9a.2 shall replace the authorizations defined in clause 6.7.3.
[R-5.9a-023] The MCX Service system shall be capable of handling private calls to functional aliases that are allowed to be simultaneously active for multiple MCX Users by using group call mechanisms and by using first-to-answer private
|
+
+| | | | | |
+|--|--|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| | | | | call mechanisms.
[R-5.9a-024] The MCX Service system shall enable an MCX Service Administrator to select the mechanism to be used for handling of private calls to functional aliases that are allowed to be simultaneously active for multiple MCX Users.
|
+|--|--|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+
+## 6.10 Recording of communication
+
+### 6.10.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to recording and access are described, the following use cases are identified
+
+- Recording
+
+### 6.10.2 Use case: Recording
+
+#### 6.10.2.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS System is able to provide means to record communication and communication related information for voice, video and data services. The means of recording include FRMCS User identities, functional identities and location information of all involved users.
+
+Which communication is applicable for recording is configurable. Criteria for recording can be based on different attributes or a combination of those e.g. communication application, functional identity, type of communication, location, certain context.
+
+#### 6.10.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+A communication is configured to be recorded.
+
+#### 6.10.2.3 Service flows
+
+Recording of the communication starts when the particular communication becomes initiated.
+
+The recording stops when the communication is terminated.
+
+#### 6.10.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The recorded communication is stored and ready for post-analysis
+
+#### 6.10.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference | Requirement text | Applicati | SA1 spec | Comments |
+|-----------|------------------|-----------|----------|----------|
+|-----------|------------------|-----------|----------|----------|
+
+| Number | | on /
Transport | covering | |
+|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.10.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall provide the means to record communication and communication related information to an external system. That encompasses voice, video and data services. | A | 22.280 | On-Network: 6.15.4-001 - 010
Off-Network: covered by [R-7.14-001]: Only metadata are logged, no recording of transmissions of group/private communications as provided in on-network ([R-6.15.4-003]).
|
+| [R-6.10.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall be able to select the communication to be provided to the external system based on the following criteria:
- • Communication application / use case
- • FRMCS User identities
- • functional identities
- • location information of all involved users
| A | 22.280 | On-Network: 6.15.4-001 - 010
Off-Network: not applicable. No selection mechanism are supported. All communication and non-communication activity metadata from an MCX UE are collected.
|
+
+## 6.11 Remote control of engines communication related use cases
+
+### 6.11.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to remote control of engines communication are described, the following use cases are identified
+
+- Initiation of a remote control of engines communication
+- Termination of a remote control of engines communication
+
+## 6.11.2 Use case: Initiation/termination of a remote control of engines communication
+
+### 6.11.2.1 Description
+
+Remote control requires secure data communication between the FRMCS Equipment as part of on-board control system and the FRMCS User as part of a remote-control device, either via Off-network or On-network communication.
+
+### 6.11.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User are authorised to initiate engine remote control communication.
+
+### 6.11.2.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS User at the ground initiates the engine remote control communication to the FRMCS Equipment in the locomotive.
+
+The communication requests the QoS which matches to the application category as defined by the operator within the FRMCS System.
+
+The FRMCS User at the ground terminates the engine remote control communication to the FRMCS Equipment in the locomotive.
+
+### 6.11.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+Remote control communication for the engine is established.
+
+## 6.11.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.11.2-001] | Upon a request received from an authorised FRMCS User, the FRMCS System shall establish or terminate communication for remote control of engines communication. | A | Covered 22.280 | Covered by [R-5.21.1.2-001] The MCX Service shall provide a mechanism for an authorized MCX User (e.g. dispatch operator) to remotely initiate an MCX Service Private Communication or MCX Service Group Communication from another user's MCX UE. [R-5.21.2.1-001] The MCX Service shall provide a mechanism for an authorized MCX User (e.g. dispatch operator) to remotely terminate an MCX Service Private Communication or MCX Service Group Communication from another user's MCX UE. |
+| [R-6.11.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall support engine remote control communication in both On-network and off-network communication mode. | A | Covered by 22.280 | As the whole section 5 is applicable for both on-network and off-network. i.e., "MCX Service requirements common for on the network and off the network"
So the requirements ("[R-5.21.1.2-001] and[R-5.21.2.0-001]") are naturally supported by on/off – network communication. |
+
+## 6.12 Automatic Train Operation data communication
+
+### 6.12.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related Automatic Train Operation (ATO) communication are described, the following use cases are identified
+
+- Initiation of an Automatic Train Operation data communication
+- Termination of an Automatic Train Operation data communication
+
+Note: A plain 3GPP bearer is requested below, as additional layers such as MCData are adding additional hurdles in achieving certification by railway regulatory authorities.
+
+## 6.12.2 Description
+
+Automatic Train Operation (ATO) is the application which performs some or all the functions of automatic speed regulation, accurate stopping, door opening and closing, performance level regulation, and other functions assigned to a train driver or train attendant.
+
+Some ATO systems require radio communication to interchange performance and/or safety relevant data between a train and the corresponding trackside control center.
+
+The (FRMCS) users in this case are the ATO application both on-board of the train and in the control center at the trackside (ground system).
+
+ATO systems may require communication between on-board applications of different trains (on-network).
+
+Some modes of ATO operation require real time video between a train and the corresponding trackside control center. Please refer to the Real Time Video streaming use cases.
+
+## 6.12.3 Use case: Initiation of an Automatic Train Operation data communication
+
+### 6.12.3.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS Application is able to initiate data communication.
+
+### 6.12.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The initiating functional identity is authorised to initiate the automatic train operation data communication to the trackside control centre.
+
+### 6.12.3.3 Service flows
+
+The initiating FRMCS Application (e.g. on-board of the train) initiates the Automatic Train Operation data communication to the receiving side (e.g. control centre at the trackside).
+
+### 6.12.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+ATO communication is established.
+
+Data can be exchanged between the Automatic Train Operation applications.
+
+### 6.12.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.12.3-001] | Upon request received from a functional identity entitled to set up ATO communication the FRMCS System shall be able to setup and terminate a data bearer for ATO operation of a QoS, priority and setup time as defined in clause 12.10. | A | TS 22.282 (data bearer)
N/A (QoS) | TS 22.282 sub-clause 5.5.2
See section 12.10 below |
+
+## 6.13 Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure related use cases
+
+### 6.13.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communication are described. The following use cases are identified
+
+- Initiation of Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communication
+- Termination of a Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure
+
+### 6.13.2 Use case: Initiation of a Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communication
+
+#### 6.13.2.1 Description
+
+This use case enables FRMCS to setup data communication between infrastructure systems and a ground based or train based system in order to monitor or control critical infrastructure such as train detection, signals and indicators, movable infrastructure, level crossing elements, including barrier controls vehicle sensors, lighting controls and alarms.
+
+#### 6.13.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The initiating application is authorised to initiate Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communication.
+
+The receiving application is authorised to use the Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communication.
+
+#### 6.13.2.3 Service flows
+
+The initiating application initiates the monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communication to the receiving side.
+
+#### 6.13.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure data is made available to the application.
+
+### 6.13.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.13.2-001] | Upon request from an authorised FRMCS Application the FRMCS System shall be able to establish data communication between a FRMCS Equipment and a central monitoring infrastructure system for monitoring and controlling critical infrastructures. | A | Covered by 22.282 | [R-6.1.2.1.2-001] The MCData Service shall enable the control of robots.
1) A FRMCS Equipment can be seen as a certain kind of robots.
[R-6.1.3.2-001] The MCData Service shall provide a means to share in real-time operational status information between members of a selected group.
2) Sharing the operational status information can be seen as monitoring.
|
+| [R-6.13.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall setup the monitoring of critical infrastructure communication with an operator defined QoS and priority and setup time as defined in clause 12.10. | A | TS 22.282 (data bearer)
N/A (QoS) | Mission critical is already supported by 3GPP QoS (QCI or 5QI)
[R-5.1.7-002] The MCX Service shall provide a mechanism to prioritize MCX Service Group Communications based on the priorities associated with elements of the communication (e.g., service type, requesting identity, and target identity).
See section 12.10 below.
|
+
+### 6.13.3 Use case: Termination of a Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communication
+
+#### 6.13.3.1 Description
+
+Terminate data communication between infrastructure systems and a ground based or train-based system used to monitor or control critical infrastructure.
+
+#### 6.13.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure applications have an ongoing data communication.
+
+### 6.13.3.3 Service flows
+
+One of the communication entities terminates the monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communication.
+
+### 6.13.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The terminating Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure application entity is disconnected from the receiving application entity.
+
+### 6.13.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.13.3-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to terminate data communication between the infrastructure systems and a central monitoring infrastructure system upon request by either communication partner. | A | Covered by 22.280, 22.282, | TS 22.280 [R-6.7.6-002] The MCX Service shall provide a means by which an MCX User ends a Private Communication (without Floor control) in which the MCX User is a Participant. TS 22.282
[R-5.4.2-008] The MCData data streaming capability shall allow an authorised user to terminate streaming of data being sent and cancel streaming of data remaining buffered in the system waiting to be streamed.
|
+
+## 6.14 Use case: Data transmission in real time
+
+### 6.14.1 Description
+
+This use case allows the authorized FRMCS Users to exchange data in real time from each other, for example, health and status of train are transferred between intelligent on-train systems and train maintenance.
+
+### 6.14.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The user A is authorized FRMCS User (e.g., administrator who has authorization to the data).
+
+User B is an equipment for monitoring the train.
+
+User C is a normal FRMCS User (e.g., user without authorization to the data)
+
+### 6.14.3 Service flows
+
+User A requests User B to transmit the data (e.g., health, status of train, etc.) in real time.
+
+User B receives the request from User A and accepts the request.
+
+User B starts to transmit the requested data in real time to User A.
+
+User C requests User B to transmit the data (e.g., health, status of train, etc.) in real time.
+
+User B receives the request from C and rejects the request (e.g., without authorization to the data).
+
+User C receives a notification that the request was rejected by User B.
+
+## 6.14.4 Post-conditions
+
+The data of User B is sent to User A in real time.
+
+The data of User B is not sent to User C in real time.
+
+## 6.14.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.14.5-001] | The FRMCS System shall enable an authorized FRMCS User to request another FRMCS User to establish real time data transmission. | A | TS 22.282 | Covered by 22.282 [R-5.5.2-003]: remote initiation of MCData Point-to-point IP connectivity between two MCData Users |
+| [R-6.14.5-002] | The FRMCS System shall provide a list of identities for the requesting authorized FRMCS User to select from. The list may contain functional identities, FRMCS User identities, or FRMCS Equipment Identities | A | TS 22.280 | Covered by functional alias requirements. |
+| [R-6.14.5-003] | The real time data request shall either be based on the functional identity, FRMCS User Identity, or FRMCS Equipment Identity. | A | TS 22.280 | [R-5.9a-002] If the MCX Service system supports functional aliases, the MCX User shall be reachable by its functional alias(es).
Functional Alias is specified by merging functional identity, user identity, and equipment identity. |
+| [R-6.14.5-004] | The FRMCS User shall be able to accept a real time data transmission request. | A | TS 22.282 | Only an authorised person can enable authorisation of IP connectivity to a specific destination. |
+| [R-6.14.5-005] | The FRMCS User shall be able to reject a data in real time transmission request. | A | TS 22.282 | Only an authorised person can revoke authorisation of IP connectivity to a specific destination. |
+| [R-6.14.5-006] | The requesting FRMCS User shall be notified if the request is rejected or ignored. | A | TS 22.282 | Implicit requirement. |
+
+## 6.15 On-train incoming voice or video communication from the Controller(s) of the train towards the drivers
+
+### 6.15.1 Introduction
+
+This use case is based on the International Union of Railways User Requirements Specification on FRMCS [15].
+
+It is considered as a necessary scenario in China railway market that an authorised controller shall be able to set up a voice communication to a driver. As stated in URS 2.0, this application allows an authorised controller to establish voice communication with the driver of a specific train for operational purposes, for example to support the transfer of orders, to advise of delays, reporting of a disturbance, assault or staff security support.
+
+The controller shall be able to call the drivers located in the area managed by the controller.
+
+The controller can initiate the voice or video call to the drivers using the function alias.
+
+The following use cases related to the function of On-train incoming voice or video communication from the Controller(s) of the train towards the drivers are defined.
+
+- Initiation of On-train incoming voice or video communication from the Controller(s) of the train towards the drivers
+- Termination of On-train incoming voice or video communication from the Controller(s) of the train towards the drivers
+
+### 6.15.2 Use case: Initiation of On-train incoming voice or video communication from the Controller(s) of the train towards the drivers
+
+#### 6.15.2.1 Description
+
+An authorised Controller shall be able to set up a voice or video communication to the drivers within a configured area.
+
+#### 6.15.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The authorisation application authorises the Controller to call the drivers.
+
+#### 6.15.2.3 Service Flows
+
+##### Controller(s) to Drivers
+
+The Controller initiates the voice or video communication to the drivers. The priority of the communication is managed by the prioritisation application.
+
+The FRMCS System determines the drivers, based on:
+
+- Location information of the train provided by the locations services application, and/or
+- Functional identity provided by the Role management and presence application.
+- System configuration (To identify which Controller is responsible for which part of the track/station/etc.)
+
+The FRMCS System establishes the voice or video communication to the drivers within a setup time specified as NORMAL (see 12.10). The information from the Role management and presence application is used to present the
+
+identities for both Drivers and Controller. Also, the location of the Drivers is presented to the Controller which is retrieved from the location services application.
+
+If the controller is connected to more than one train, the multiuser talker control application is used.
+
+The voice or video communication is recorded by the Voice or video recording and access application.
+
+#### 6.15.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The controller is connected to the requested drivers.
+
+#### 6.15.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------|
+| [R-6.15.2-001] | For Controller to drivers voice or video communication, the FRMCS System shall be able to determine the responsible driver(s), based on the location of the train and/or the function alias and/or the System configuration on the Controller who is responsible for which part of the track/station/etc. | A | 22.280 | 6.6.4.2 |
+
+#### 6.15.3 Use case: Termination of On-train incoming voice or video communication from the Controller(s) of the train towards the drivers
+
+##### 6.15.3.1 Description
+
+Only the controller can terminate the On-train incoming voice or video communication from the Controller(s) of the train towards the drivers.
+
+##### 6.15.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The controller is connected to the requested drivers.
+
+##### 6.15.3.3 Service Flows
+
+Only the controller is able to terminate the voice or video communication.
+
+##### 6.15.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The controller terminates the voice or video communication.
+
+### 6.15.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------|
+| [R-6.15.3-001] | For Controller to Driver communication, only the controller shall be able to terminate the On-train incoming voice or video communication. | A | 22.280 | R-5.9a-012a
R-5.9a-012b |
+
+## 6.16 Use cases on data communication for Train Operation System Communication
+
+### 6.16.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to data communication for Train Operation System are described. The following use cases are identified:
+
+- Train dispatch order data communication between driver and controller
+- LOCOTROL information transmission between leading engine and subordinate engine on a multi-headed locomotive
+- Data communication for Security use cases between two approaching trains
+
+### 6.16.2 Use case: Train dispatch order data communication between controller and driver
+
+#### 6.16.2.1 Description
+
+In this use case, the FRMCS system transmits the train dispatch order between Controller and Driver, including train orders, station receiving route, running tokens, etc.
+
+It is needed that the information are received in due time by the driver to avoid any collision with any other train standing in another lines.
+
+#### 6.16.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+User A and User B are authorized FRMCS User.
+
+User A is a Driver entering in the train station.
+
+User B is Controller of the train responsible for the train's current area.
+
+#### 6.16.2.3 Service flows
+
+User B initiates a data communication to User A in order to send station route within short time.
+
+#### 6.16.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+User A receives the station line to follow when entering in the train station.
+
+#### 6.16.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
+| 6.16.2-001 | The FRMCS system shall support data communication between Controller and Driver with a QoS, priority and setup time as defined in clause 12.10. | A | TS 22.282 (data bearer)
N/A (QoS) | TS 22.282 sub-clause 6.1.2
See section 12.10 below |
+
+### 6.16.3 Use case: LOCOTROL information transmission between leading engine and subordinate engine on a multi-headed locomotive
+
+#### 6.16.3.1 Description
+
+The multi-headed locomotive has several engines, all the engines act synchronized as the LOCOTROL information will be sent between engines through FRMCS system.
+
+It is quite important to ensure this LOCOTROL information is sent to the corresponding locomotives safely and in an integrated way so that synchronized actions can be taken.
+
+#### 6.16.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+User A and User B are authorized FRMCS User.
+
+User A is a leading locomotive.
+
+User B is a subordinate locomotive.
+
+#### 6.16.3.3 Service flows
+
+User A initiates a data communication to send the LOCOTROL information to transport information regarding synchronization with the User B in safely and timely method, e.g., with a QoS and priority.
+
+#### 6.16.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+User B receives the LOCOTROL information, so User B can be kept synchronized with User A.
+
+### 6.16.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
+| 6.16.3-001 | The FRMCS system shall provide a mean to exchange messages between different FRMCS Equipment with a QoS, priority and setup time as defined in clause 12.10. | A | TS 22.282 (data bearer)
N/A (QoS) | TS 22.282 sub-clause 6.1.2
See section 12.10 below |
+
+## 6.16.4 Use case: data communication for security between two approaching trains
+
+### 6.16.4.1 Description
+
+This use case describes data communication between FRMCS Users in order to avoid train accident, for example, two trains exchange warning data to each other when one train is approaching to another train.
+
+And it is also used for the case that different devices in different carriages send detection data to head device in the train, so that the Driver can take appropriate actions.
+
+This data information needs to be transported in a safe and timely manner so that the train can operate in a safe way.
+
+### 6.16.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+User A, User B, User C and User D are authorized FRMCS Users.
+
+User A is a Driver of train A.
+
+User B is FRMCS Equipment used for detection of the environment (sensor).
+
+User C is a Driver of train B.
+
+Train A is approaching to train B.
+
+### 6.16.4.3 Service flows
+
+Train driver User A initiates a data communication to the other train driver User C to indicate the approaching event to train B.
+
+The sensor User B initiates a data communication to train driver User A, to report what User B detected if some threshold is reached.
+
+These two communications are transported in safely and timely method
+
+### 6.16.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+Train driver User C receives the approaching event and takes appropriate action.
+
+Train driver User A receives the message from sensor User B.
+
+#### 6.16.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
+| 6.16.4-001 | The FRMCS system shall support data communication between FRMCS Users with a QoS, priority and setup time as defined in clause 12.10 | A | TS 22.282 (data bearer)
N/A (QoS) | TS 22.282 sub-clause 6.1.2
See section 12.10 below |
+
+### 6.17 On-train safety device to ground communication
+
+#### 6.17.1 Introduction
+
+Based on a critical situation in the train (for example, triggered by a Driver Safety Device (DSD) or Dead Man Switch, a voice and/or data communication is automatically set up towards a ground user (controller or ground system).
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to On-train safety device to ground communication are defined. The following use case describes:
+
+- Initiation, termination of the On-train safety device data communication
+- Voice communication between driver/train staff and controller/train control system
+
+#### 6.17.2 Use case: Initiation of safety device to ground data communication
+
+##### 6.17.2.1 Description
+
+- 1.) Based on a train safety issue, the Driver Safety Device will automatically establish a data communication to FRMCS User(s) at the ground (controller or train management system). The functional identity of the DSD and other FRMCS User(s) at the train are indicated to the FRMCS User(s) at the ground.
+- 2.) On demand a voice communication can be established by the train staff (FRMCS User) or the FRMCS User at the ground.
+
+##### 6.17.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User at the train is authorised to initiate Driver Safety Device data communication.
+
+The FRMCS User at the ground (controller or train management system) is authorised to receive Driver Safety Device data communication.
+
+##### 6.17.2.3 Service flows
+
+If the driver is not reacting to the DSD, the Driver Safety Device (FRMCS User) may initiate a data communication to the FRMCS User at the ground to notify the controller or train management system about the safety issue of a running train.
+
+After reception of this train safety issue, other trains in the same area get notified by an emergency alert to lower the instantaneous velocity of the train or stops completely.
+
+The FRMCS User at the ground (controller or train management system) acknowledges the reception of DSD emergency notification. The DSD emergency notification remains active and is continuously transmitted until the train safety has been recovered.
+
+In addition, the entitled train staff or entitled ground staff establishes a voice communication to commence further steps, to recover train safety again.
+
+#### 6.17.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The emergency didn't cause a safety issue at other trains as well as the people in those trains.
+
+## 6.17.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.17.2-001] | The FRMCS Equipment shall be able to integrate the Driver Safety Device (DSD). | A/T | N/A | Outside scope of 3GPP |
+| [R-6.17.2-002] | Triggering the Driver Safety Device (DSD) the FRMCS User related to the DSD shall be able to establish a non-pre-emptible data communication that matches with QoS category CRITICAL DATA (see QoS section), to FRMCS Users in the same area i.e. trains, controller and/or a train management system. | A | 22.280
22.282 | Covered by 22.282-5.2.2-XXX, 5.3.2-XXX, R-5.4.2-XXX, 5.5.2-XXX, 22.280 [R-5.1.7-002], [R-6.6.4.2-002a], [R-6.6.5.2-007] |
+| [R-6.17.2-003] | The FRMCS System shall be able to forward the Driver Safety Device trigger to the Controller or external systems e.g. train operation management. | A | 22.280 | [R-5.1.7-002], [R-6.6.4.2-002a], [R-6.6.5.2-007] |
+| [R-6.17.2-004] | Upon request by an authorised FRMCS user at the ground or the train, the FRMCS System shall be able to establish a non-pre-emptible voice communication. | A | 22.280 | Covered by [R-5.1.7-002], [R-5.6.2.2.1-006], [R-6.8.1-002], [R-6.8.1-003] |
+| [R-6.17.2-005] | The FRMCS system shall determine the responsible FRMCS Users (e.g. trains, controllers or train management system) based on.
- • location information, instantaneous velocity and direction of the concerned train (DSD trigger active)
- • functional identity associated with the Driver Safety Device
| A | 22.280 | [R-5.1.7-002], [R-6.6.4.2-002a], [R-6.6.5.2-007] |
+
+| | | | | |
+|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|--------|-----------------------------------------|
+| | | | | |
+| [R-6.17.2-006] | Upon request by the Driver Safety Device (DSD), authorised FRMCS Users or authorised external systems, the FRMCS System shall terminate the data communication related to the DSD. | A | 22.282 | Covered by [R-6.2.3-001], [R-6.2.3-013] |
+| [R-6.17.2-007] | For On-train safety device to ground communication, the communication shall be recorded by the recording and access to recorded data application. | A | 22.280 | [R-6.15.4-XXX] |
+
+## 6.18 Train Integrity monitoring data communication
+
+### 6.18.1 Introduction
+
+Train integrity encompasses the continuous verification of the train completeness, i.e. trains integrity status, for the time of mission. The safety system on-board the train and/or at the ground will apply the foreseen safety reaction when the train integrity status becomes undefined or is unknown.
+
+Due to its safety relevance, train integrity information exchange requires a very high reliable communication as well as very low packet data latency.
+
+### 6.18.2 Use case: Data communication for train integrity information exchange
+
+#### 6.18.2.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS System will be used to exchange such train integrity information. Every train regardless the type of composition requires this kind of data communication in a fully automated train operation scenario.
+
+The FRMCS Users in this case are the train integrity entities on-board of the train and the ground system. There several options to determine train integrity:
+
+- 1.) Train integrity information will be only determined by the applicable entities at the train. For this approach train integrity entities are located at the front and the end of the train as well as on demand partially between the front and the end. The front entity supplies the train's integrity status to the safety entity on-board the train responsible for Control Command Signalling. This scenario requires Off-network communication bearer services for multi-user communication.
+- 2.) Train integrity information will be determined by the applicable entities at the train and the ground. Train integrity entities are distributed equally over the total length of a train. The ground (train) integrity entity will collect the reported train integrity information and compute the train integrity status of a particular train. This scenario requires On-network communication bearer services.
+
+### 6.18.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS Users (train integrity entities) are authorised to initiate a train integrity data communication.
+
+The FRMCS Users (train integrity entities) are authorised to use the train integrity application.
+
+### 6.18.2.3 Service flows
+
+#### Off-network communication
+
+On demand by the FRMCS Users (train integrity entities), the FRMCS System establishes a communication between the authorised FRMCS Users at the train. The data communication for train integrity requires the QoS class which matches the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see chapter 12.10) within the FRMCS system. The FRMCS system establishes the bearer service required for the data communication within a setup time specified as NORMAL (see 12.10).
+
+The FRMCS System verifies if the FRMCS Users are authorised to use the train integrity application.
+
+The FRMCS Users are exchanging continuously information about the train integrity until the end of the mission.
+
+The entire train integrity communication will be recorded.
+
+#### On-network communication
+
+On demand by the FRMCS Users (train integrity entities), the FRMCS System establishes a communication between the authorised FRMCS Users at the train and the ground. The data communication for train integrity requires the QoS class which matches the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see 12.10) within the FRMCS system. The FRMCS system establishes the bearer service required for the data communication within a setup time specified as NORMAL (see 12.10).
+
+The FRMCS System verifies if the FRMCS Users are authorised to use the train integrity application.
+
+The FRMCS Users are exchanging continuously information about the train integrity until the end of the mission.
+
+The entire train integrity communication will be recorded.
+
+### 6.18.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+Train integrity information can be exchanged continuously between the involved FRMCS Users
+
+The train approaches its final destination without any delay.
+
+## 6.18.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.18.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall allow authorised FRMCS Users to establish/terminate train integrity communication. | A | TS 22.282 | Sub-clause 5.5
The whole section 5 is applicable for both on-network and off-network. |
+| [R-6.18.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall allow authorised FRMCS Users to use train integrity monitoring. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 sub-clauses 5.1.x
The whole section 5 is applicable for both on-network and off-network. |
+| [R-6.18.2-003] | The FRMCS System shall provide the necessary communication means to support train integrity monitoring. | T | TS 22.282 | TS 22.282 sub-clause 5.5 (IP connectivity)
The whole section 5 is applicable for both on-network and off-network. |
+| [R-6.18.2-004] | The FRMCS System shall support train integrity monitoring in Off-network, On-network and a combination of On-network/Off-network mode. | T | TS 22.282
TS 22.280 | TS 22.282: IP connectivity sub-clause 5.5. The whole section 5 is applicable for both on-network and off-network.
TS 22.280:
On network is covered by sub-clause 6.
Off network covered (see all R-6.18.2-XXX requirements). |
+| [R-6.18.2-005] | The FRMCS System shall provide the QoS class as defined for CRITICAL DATA (see 12.10) within the FRMCS System. | A/T | N/A | See section 12.10 below |
+| [R-6.18.2-006] | The FRMCS System shall setup train integrity monitoring within the time specified as NORMAL (see 12.10). | A/T | N/A | See section 12.10 below |
+| [R-6.18.2-007] | The FRMCS System shall allow arbitration for Train Integrity communication. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 sub-clause 5.4.2
The whole section 5 is applicable for both on-network and off-network. |
+
+## 6.19 Use case: Broadcast of public emergency warning information
+
+### 6.19.1 Introduction
+
+A Public Safety Authority is able to broadcast a public emergency warning to a subset of the civil population based on their location. The subset can include FRMCS Users because of the location or functional identity of the FRMCS User.
+
+## 6.19.2 Description
+
+The Public Safety Authority (PSA) is able to broadcast textual messages, pictures, audio and video content to a subset of FRMCS Users.
+
+### 6.19.2a Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User is active (logged in) in the FRMCS system.
+
+The FRMCS System provides interworking with a Public Safety Authority.
+
+## 6.19.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS System is receiving broadcasting information from the PSA.
+
+The FRMCS System determines the set of FRMCS Users based on:
+
+- The location provided by the PSA broadcast system and/or;
+- The functional addressing information of the concerned FRMCS Users provided by PSA and/or;
+- The system configuration (e.g. a fixed routing or other conditions).
+
+The FRMCS System establishes a data bearer services for PSA data communication which matches to the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see [QoS]).
+
+The FRMCS System establishes the data bearer service(s) within the timeframe specified as IMMEDIATE (see [QoS]).
+
+The data communication is recorded by the data recording and access application.
+
+## 6.19.4 Post-conditions
+
+The concerned FRMCS Users are informed about the public emergency information provided by the PSA.
+
+## 6.19.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.19.5-001] | The FRMCS System shall provide the interworking to the Public Safety Authority broadcast information system to convey public emergency warning information to authorised FRMCS Users. | A/T | 22.268 | This can be (partly) solved with existing PWS system [TS 22.268] or can be handled at application level. |
+| [R-6.19.5-002] | The FRMCS System shall be able to locate FRMCS User for PSA broadcast information based on the location information provided by the PSA broadcast system and/or the functional identities of the authorised FRMCS Users. | A | 22.268 | This can be (partly) solved with existing PWS system [TS 22.268] or can be handled at application level. |
+| [R-6.19.5-003] | The FRMCS System shall be able to address PSA broadcast information to FRMCS User functional identities by using a "broadcast" functional identity. | A | 22.268 | This can be (partly) solved with existing PWS system [TS 22.268] or can be handled at application level. |
+
+## 6.20 Safety related critical advisory messaging
+
+### 6.20.1 Introduction
+
+Critical advisory information are exchanged among railway users in order to, for example, provide safety related instructions/information from a controller to a driver (e.g. written order, to inform about traffic disturbances, a change in the maximum authorized speed), provide information on how to proceed during an emergency, confirm to the controller the readiness of the train to start, exchange information between control centres on the traffic situation, etc.
+
+Messages can be exchanged on user-to-user or on multi-user level and the exchange is applicable in On-network, Off-network as well as a combination of On-network and Off-network mode.
+
+## 6.20.2 Use case: Initiation/Termination of safety device to ground data communication
+
+### 6.20.2.1 Description
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to Critical advisory messaging services – safety related- communication are described; the following use cases are identified:
+
+- The communication mode e.g. group communication required for Critical advisory messaging services
+- Service interworking with GSM-R
+
+### 6.20.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS Users are authorised to initiate and terminate safety related - Critical advisory messaging service communication.
+
+### 6.20.2.3 Service flows
+
+The authorised FRMCS User at the train/ground establishes safety related – Critical advisory messaging session that corresponds to the category CRITICAL DATA (see QoS chapter).
+
+The FRMCS system establishes the bearer service required for the messaging-based communication within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see QoS chapter).
+
+The FRMCS System assigns a certain priority of the safety related – Critical advisory messaging within arbitration management.
+
+The FRMCS Users provide their functional identity associated with the safety related – Critical advisory messaging communication.
+
+The FRMCS Users are reachable by their functional identity associated with the safety related – Critical advisory messaging communication.
+
+The FRMCS System records the communication of the involved FRMCS Users.
+
+An authorised FRMCS User is able to terminate the safety related – Critical advisory messaging communication.
+
+### 6.20.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+Safety related – Critical advisory messages can be exchanged among FRMCS Users.
+
+On demand by an authorised FRMCS User, the safety related – Critical advisory messaging communication is terminated.
+
+The FRMCS System was able to record the communication among the FRMCS Users.
+
+## 6.20.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.20.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall allow authorised FRMCS Users to establish/terminate Critical advisory messaging. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 sub-clauses 5.1.x |
+| [R-6.20.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall allow authorised FRMCS Users to use Critical advisory messaging. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 sub-clauses 5.1.x |
+| [R-6.20.2-003] | The FRMCS System shall be able to support Critical advisory messaging in Off-network mode, On-network mode as well as a combination of On-network and Off-network mode. | A | TS 22.280
TS 22.282 | .On network covered by TS 22.280 sub-clause 6.
.Partly covered by TS 22.282 sub-clause 5.2 SDS one-to-one and group but no predefined messages (not a 3GPP topic).
.Off-network is FFS. |
+| [R-6.20.2-004] | The FRMCS System shall be able to provide for Critical advisory messaging the QoS class of CRITICAL DATA (see QoS chapter). | A | N/A | See section 12.10 below |
+| [R-6.20.2-005] | The FRMCS System shall be able to manage Critical advisory messaging communication in the arbitration management. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 sub-clause 5.4.2 |
+| [R-6.20.2-006] | The FRMCS Users shall be reachable by their functional identity/ies. | A | TS 22.280 | [R-5.9a-002] |
+
+## 6.20.3 Use case: Service interworking with GSM-R
+
+### 6.20.3.1 Description
+
+Service interworking of safety related - Critical advisory messaging service communication with GSM-R is not required.
+
+6.20.3.2 Void
+
+6.20.3.3 Void
+
+6.20.3.4 Void
+
+6.20.3.5 Void
+
+## 6.21 Automatic Train Protection data communication
+
+### 6.21.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related Automatic Train Protection (ATP) data communication are described, the following use cases are identified:
+
+- Initiation of an Automatic Train Protection data communication
+- Termination of an Automatic Train Protection data communication
+- Service interworking with GSM-R
+
+### 6.21.2 Description
+
+Automatic Train Protection (ATP) is the application which performs some or all the functions that ensures the safe movement of a train. ATP supervises the train ensuring that speed and movement limits are kept and the train proceeds only when it is allowed to do so.
+
+Some ATP systems require radio communication to interchange safety relevant data between a train and the corresponding control center.
+
+The FRMCS Users in this case are the Automatic Train Protection applications both on-board of the train and in the control center at the trackside (ground system).
+
+Depending on the implementations, ATP systems require communication between on-board applications of different trains using On-network communication mode.
+
+ATP is considered to be user-to-user communication. Due to safety relevance of Automatic Train Protection (ATP), data communication requires a non-delay tolerant bearer service.
+
+### 6.21.3 Use case: Initiation of an Automatic Train Protection data communication
+
+#### 6.21.3.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS Application is able to initiate data communication for communication having continuous characteristics between the on-board applications and ground system and/or the on-board applications of other trains.
+
+#### 6.21.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User at the train and at the FRMCS User at ground are authorised to initiate the Automatic Train Protection data communication.
+
+The receiving application is authorised to use the Automatic Train Protection data communication.
+
+### 6.21.3.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS User (i.e. on-board of the train or the control center at the track side) initiates the Automatic Train Protection data communication (i.e. control center at the trackside or on-board the train).
+
+For the operation of ATP, a non-delay tolerant bearer service is required that corresponds to application category CRITICAL DATA/VERY CRITICAL DATA according to QoS definition in chapter 12.10.
+
+The FRMCS system takes into account the appropriate access criterion to establish the data bearer service within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see QoS).
+
+The arbitration among ATP and other applications applies. The communication is recorded by the data recording application.
+
+### 6.21.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+ATP related data can be exchanged between the Automatic Train Protection communication entities.
+
+### 6.21.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.21.3-001] | Upon request of an authorised FRMCS User, the FRMCS System shall be able to provide a non-delay tolerant data bearer for ATP data communication that matches to the application category of CRITICAL DATA/ VERY CRITICAL DATA (see QoS). | A/T | TS 22.282 (data bearer)
N/A (QoS) | TS 22.282 sub-clause 5.5.2
See section 12.10 below |
+| [R-6.21.3-002] | For ATP, the FRMCS System shall take into account the appropriate access criterion to establish the bearer service required for ATP communication within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see 12.10). | A/T | N/A | See section 12.10 below |
+| [R-6.21.3-003] | The FRMCS System shall apply arbitration to ATP data communication. | A | TS 22.280 | Arbitration:
[R-5.4.2-004]
[R-5.4.2-004A]
[R-5.4.2-004B] |
+| [R-6.21.3-004] | The ATP data communication shall be recorded. | A | TS 22.280 | [R-6.15.4-003] for on-network
Not applicable to off-network (see table C-1). |
+
+## 6.21.4 Use case: Termination of an Automatic Train Protection data communication
+
+### 6.21.4.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS User is able to terminate data communication.
+
+#### 6.21.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The Automatic Train Protection related data communication is ongoing.
+
+#### 6.21.4.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS User (i.e. on-board of the train or the control centre at the track side) terminates the Automatic Train Protection data communication.
+
+The FRMCS System terminates the bearer service required for ATP related data communication.
+
+#### 6.21.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+The Automatic Train Protection data communication has been released.
+
+#### 6.21.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.21.4-001] | The FRMCS User shall be able to terminate the Automatic Train Protection data communication. The FRMCS System shall terminate the bearer service. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 Requirements [R-6.4.9-001] on termination conditions.
[R-6.7.6-002]
7.4: specific termination conditions for off-net. |
+
+### 6.22 Voice communication transfer related use cases
+
+#### 6.22.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to the transfer of incoming or ongoing voice communication are defined. The following use cases are defined:
+
+- Transfer of an incoming voice communication
+- Transfer of an ongoing voice communication
+- Service interworking and service continuation with GSM-R
+
+To provide some background, a description of one use case based on operational rules is described: a railway station could temporarily be closed for any operational reasons. In that case, railway staff could not be joined anymore. A mechanism of transferring calls to railway staff located in another railway stations shall be provided.
+
+The use cases are applicable for user-to-user voice communications.
+
+#### 6.22.2 Use case: Transfer of an incoming voice communication
+
+##### 6.22.2.1 Description
+
+When FRMCS User receives a notification of an incoming voice communication, and the FRMCS Equipment does not automatically accept the communication, the FRMCS User, if authorised, shall be able to transfer the communication to another FRMCS User.
+
+#### 6.22.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+FRMCS User is registered to a single or multiple FRMCS Equipment.
+
+FRMCS User is or is not part of an ongoing communication.
+
+#### 6.22.2.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS System provides and activates a mechanism to transfer communications.
+
+FRMCS User is authorised to use the mechanism to transfer communications.
+
+When the notification of an incoming voice communication is received by the FRMCS equipment, a notification is presented to appropriate FRMCS User allowing the transfer of the incoming voice communication to another FRMCS User.
+
+FRMCS User selects the new FRMCS User out of a list (e.g. telephone book) or entered manually based on either FRMCS User Identity, FRMCS Functional Identity or MSISDN.
+
+The arbitration is managed by the arbitration application.
+
+#### 6.22.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The incoming voice communication is transferred to the new FRMCS User by the FRMCS System.
+
+## 6.22.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.22.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall enable FRMCS User to transfer incoming voice communications based on different criteria | A/T | 22.179 | Limited to private calls because group communication already provides other mechanisms [R-5.6.3-015], [R-6.7.4-016] |
+| [R-6.22.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall support the transfer of incoming voice communications based on following criteria: - • Unconditional;
- • When not reachable;
- • Busy;
- • Not answering;
| A/T | 22.179
22.280 | Partly covered (Busy excluded). Limited to private calls because group communication already provides other mechanisms [R-5.6.3-015], [R-6.7.4-016]. Busy concept no more applicable to MCX: an MCX UE/client can be simultaneously engaged in multiple private calls, or even mixed in private and group calls (see 22.179 5.5 & 22.280 5.4 & 6.14). |
+| [R-6.22.2-003] | The FRMCS System shall be able to support configurable time when the FRMCS User is busy and shall be able to support configurable time when the FRMCS User is not answering | A/T | 22.179
22.280 | Partly covered (Busy excluded). Limited to private calls because group communication already provides other mechanisms [R-5.6.3-015], [R-6.7.4-016]. Busy concept no more applicable to MCX: an MCX UE/client can be simultaneously engaged in multiple private calls, or even mixed in private and group calls (see 22.179 5.5 & 22.280 5.4 & 6.14). |
+| [R-6.22.2-004] | The FRMCS System shall support the transfer of incoming voice communications for user-to-user. | A/T | 22.179 | Indicated by sub-clause 5.6.3 Private Call (with Floor control) commencement requirements
6.7.4 Private Call (without Floor control) commencement requirements |
+| [R-6.22.2-005] | The FRMCS System shall be aware of the busy condition of the targeted FRMCS user to forward the incoming voice communication to another FRMCS User. | A/T | 22.179 | Partly covered (Busy excluded). Limited to private calls because group communication already provides other mechanisms [R-5.6.3-015], [R-6.7.4-016]. Busy concept no more applicable to MCX: an MCX UE/client can be simultaneously engaged in multiple private calls, or even mixed in private and group calls (see 22.179 5.5 & 22.280 5.4 & 6.14). |
+
+## 6.22.3 Use case: Transfer of an ongoing voice communication
+
+### 6.22.3.1 Description
+
+When FRMCS User is part of an ongoing voice communication, FRMCS User, if authorised, shall be able to transfer the communication to another FRMCS User.
+
+### 6.22.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+FRMCS User is registered to a single or multiple FRMCS Equipment.
+
+FRMCS User is part of an ongoing voice communication.
+
+The FRMCS System provides and activates a mechanism to transfer communications.
+
+FRMCS User is authorised to use the mechanism to transfer communications.
+
+### 6.22.3.3 Service flows
+
+Whilst in an ongoing voice communication, the FRMCS Equipment provides an option to the FRMCS User allowing the transfer of the current communication to another FRMCS User.
+
+FRMCS User selects the new FRMCS User out of a list (e.g. telephone book) or entered manually based on either FRMCS User Identity, FRMCS Functional Identity or MSISDN.
+
+### 6.22.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The ongoing voice communication is transferred to the new FRMCS User by the FRMCS System.
+
+### 6.22.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-6.22.3-001] | The FRMCS System shall enable FRMCS User to transfer ongoing voice communications. | A/T | 22.179 | Limited to private calls because group communication already provides other mechanisms [R-5.6.3-014], [R-6.7.4-015] |
+
+## 6.22.4 Use case: Service interworking with GSM-R
+
+### 6.22.4.1 Description
+
+For coexistence between FRMCS System and the legacy GSM-R communication system, service interworking among the systems is required.
+
+Transfer of incoming voice communication to a GSM-R User shall be provided by the FRMCS System.
+
+Transfer of ongoing communication to a GSM-R User shall be provided by the FRMCS System.
+
+Service interworking for the automatic transfer function is not required.
+
+#### 6.22.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+FRMCS User is attached to the FRMCS System.
+
+GSM-R User is attached to GSM-R System.
+
+The transfer procedure (either transfer of incoming voice communication or transfer of ongoing communication) has been initiated by the FRMCS User.
+
+#### 6.22.4.3 Service flows
+
+FRMCS User selects the new GSM-R User out of a list (e.g. telephone book) or entered manually based on the functional address of the GSM-R User or E.164 numbering plan.
+
+#### 6.22.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+The incoming voice communication or the ongoing voice communication is transferred to the new GSM-R User by the FRMCS System.
+
+#### 6.22.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------|
+| [R-6.22.4-001] | The FRMCS System shall allow FRMCS User to forward of incoming voice communications and transfer of ongoing communication to GSM-R User using the applicable the addressing scheme. | A/T | 22.280 | [R-5.19.2-006] |
+
+---
+
+## 7 Performance communication applications related use cases
+
+### 7.1 Use cases related to transmission of real time video
+
+#### 7.1.1 Introduction
+
+In this clause, the use cases related to the function of transmitting video in real time are defined.
+
+- An FRMCS User requesting another FRMCS User to transmit real time video
+- An FRMCS User receiving a request to transmit real time video
+- An FRMCS User accepting a request to transmit real time video
+- An FRMCS User rejecting a request to transmit real time video
+- An FRMCS User ignoring a request to transmit real time video
+
+## 7.1.2 Use Case: An FRMCS User requesting another FRMCS User to transmit real time video
+
+### 7.1.2.1 Description
+
+An FRMCS User can request another FRMCS User to transmit real time video.
+
+### 7.1.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User has a functional Role entitled to request other FRMCS Users to transmit real time video.
+
+The requested FRMCS User can be addressed by the assigned functional identity(ies), FRMCS User Identity, or FRMCS Equipment Identity.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment of the requested user is capable of providing video
+
+### 7.1.2.3 Service flows
+
+#### Requesting FRMCS User
+
+From a list of FRMCS Users provided by the FRMCS System, or by entering an unlisted identity, the requesting FRMCS User selects another FRMCS User to be invited. The list may contain functional identities, FRMCS User identities, FRMCS Equipment Identities, or phone numbers.
+
+### 7.1.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User has been requested transmission of real time video.
+
+### 7.1.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-7.1.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall enable an entitled FRMCS User to request another FRMCS User to transmit video in real time. | A | 22.281 | 5.1.2.2.2-xxx |
+| [R-7.1.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall provide a list of identities for the requesting FRMCS User to select from. The list may contain functional identities, FRMCS User identities, FRMCS Equipment Identities or E.164 numbers. | A | 22.281 | 5.1.3.2.2-xxx |
+| [R-7.1.2-003] | The real time video request shall either be based on the functional identity, FRMCS User Identity, FRMCS Equipment Identity or E.164 number. | A | 22.280 | This requirement is covered by MCCore for rail esp. 5.9a |
+
+### 7.1.3 Use Case: An FRMCS User receiving a real time video request to transmit real time video
+
+#### 7.1.3.1 Description
+
+An FRMCS User will receive a real time video request originated by the requesting FRMCS User.
+
+#### 7.1.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User has a functional Role that is entitled to receive real time video request from other FRMCS Users.
+
+The FRMCS User's equipment has a capability to capture real time video.
+
+NOTE: Examples of Role management, like functional Roles, functional identities, FRMCS Equipment Identities, etc. in the railway environment are covered by Annex A.
+
+The FRMCS User may or may not be transmitting real time video to an FRMCS User different from the requesting FRMCS User.
+
+#### 7.1.3.3 Service flows
+
+##### Requested FRMCS User
+
+The real time video request is indicated to the FRMCS User by audible and visual notification. If the FRMCS User is not managed by a human, the audible and visual notification is not necessary.
+
+#### 7.1.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User has received the real time video request.
+
+Ongoing real time video transmission of the requested FRMCS User continues unaffected.
+
+#### 7.1.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------|
+| [R-7.1.3-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to deliver requests for real time video to a FRMCS User entitled to provide real time video independent of the FRMCS User being involved in another ongoing real time video transmission without excessively using radio resources. | A | 22.281 | 5.1.3.2.2-xxx |
+
+### 7.1.4 Use case: An FRMCS User accepting a request to transmit real time video
+
+#### 7.1.4.1 Description
+
+An FRMCS User can accept the invitation sent by the requesting FRMCS User.
+
+#### 7.1.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User has received a request to transmit real time video.
+
+#### 7.1.4.3 Service flows
+
+##### Requested FRMCS User
+
+The FRMCS User accepts the request to transmit real time video.
+
+##### Requesting FRMCS User
+
+The FRMCS User receives a notification that the requested FRMCS User accepted the request.
+
+#### 7.1.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+The requested FRMCS User captures and transmits video in real time to the requesting FRMCS User.
+
+In case the FRMCS User receives multiple requests to stream the video, the FRMCS System will handle this in a resource efficient way i.e. by streaming the video from the FRMCS User to the FRMCS System via the radio only once and distributing it from there to the different FRMCS Users.
+
+#### 7.1.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-7.1.4-001] | The FRMCS User shall be able to accept to accept a real time video transmission request. | A | 22.281 | 5.1.3.2.2-xxx esp. 5.1.3.2.2-003
5.2.6.2.1-xxx |
+| [R-7.1.4-002] | If entitled to, a FRMCS User shall be able to provide real time video captured by itself to the FRMCS User requesting the video. | A | 22.281 | 5.1.3.2.2-xxx esp. 5.1.3.2.2-003
5.2.6.2.1-xxx |
+| [R-7.1.4-003] | In case of multiple requests to stream the same video to several FRMCS Users the FRMCS System shall handle this in a resource efficient manner. | A | 22.281 | 5.2.6.2.4-001 |
+
+### 7.1.5 Use case: An FRMCS User rejecting a request to transmit real time video
+
+#### 7.1.5.1 Description
+
+An FRMCS User can reject the invitation sent by the requesting FRMCS User.
+
+#### 7.1.5.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User has received a request to transmit real time video.
+
+#### 7.1.5.3 Service flows
+
+##### Requested FRMCS User
+
+The FRMCS User rejects the request to transmit real time video.
+
+#### Requesting FRMCS User
+
+The FRMCS User receives a notification that the requested FRMCS User rejected the request.
+
+#### 7.1.5.4 Post-conditions
+
+The requested FRMCS User does not transmit video to the requesting FRMCS User.
+
+#### 7.1.5.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-7.1.5-001] | The FRMCS User shall be able to reject a real time video transmission request. | A | 22.281 | 5.2.6.2.4-xxx |
+| [R-7.1.5-002] | The FRMCS System shall automatically reject requests to FRMCS Users not entitled to provide video or not capable of providing video (e.g. no camera in the FRMCS Equipment). | A | 22.281 | 5.2.6.2.4-001
5.1.3.1.2-001 |
+| [R-7.1.5-003] | The requesting FRMCS User shall be notified of the reason for rejection. | A | 22.280 | This is an implicit functionality of group communication setup 6.2.1-xxx |
+
+### 7.1.6 Use case: An FRMCS User ignoring a request to transmit real time video
+
+#### 7.1.6.1 Description
+
+An FRMCS User can ignore the invitation sent by the requesting FRMCS User.
+
+#### 7.1.6.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User has received a request to transmit real time video.
+
+#### 7.1.6.3 Service flows
+
+The requested FRMCS User does not respond.
+
+The timeout expires.
+
+The requesting FRMCS User receives a notification that the invitation was rejected due to a timeout.
+
+#### 7.1.6.4 Post-conditions
+
+The requested FRMCS User does not transmit video to the requesting FRMCS User.
+
+### 7.1.6.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| | FRMCS User | | | |
+| [R-7.1.6-001] | If the receiving FRMCS User has not reacted on the invitation within a certain period of time [t1] the FRMCS System shall notify the inviting FRMCS User accordingly and stop the invitation request. | | 22.280 | This is an implicit functionality of group communication setup 6.2.1-xxx |
+
+## 7.2 Transfer of CCTV archives related use cases
+
+### 7.2.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter, the use cases related to CCTV and the use of FRMCS are defined.
+
+- Transfer of CCTV archives from Train to Ground
+- Massive Inter-carriage data transfer
+
+### 7.2.2 Use Case: Bulk Transfer of CCTV archives from Train to Ground
+
+#### 7.2.2.1 Description
+
+This use case describes the bulk transfer of CCTV archives from the on-board system to the ground system. This use case assumes the following:
+
+- The retention time for the recordings in the on-board system is seven days.
+- The minimum retention time for the CCTV recordings in the ground system is 31 days.
+- Bulk transfer of CCTV archives is performed only when train approaches stations in order to stop and at the depot.
+
+An example calculation of the CCTV storage need during 31 days period is provided in Figure.7.2.2.1-1.
+
+
+
+**Onboard CCTV storage sizes with different offload rates**
+
+The graph illustrates the onboard CCTV storage sizes (in TBytes) over a period of 35 days for different offload rates. The parameters used for the calculation are:
+
+- Num of cams: 16
+- resolution: 1080p
+- 15 fps
+- h264
+- 4.1 Mbps / cam
+
+The legend indicates the following offload rates:
+
+- 7 day storage (orange line)
+- No Offload (blue line)
+- 25% offload (black line)
+- 50% Offload (light blue line)
+- 75% Offload (grey line)
+
+| Number of days | 7 day storage (TBytes) | No Offload (TBytes) | 25% offload (TBytes) | 50% Offload (TBytes) | 75% Offload (TBytes) |
+|----------------|------------------------|---------------------|----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|
+| 0 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
+| 5 | 4.8 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
+| 10 | 4.8 | 6.6 | 5.0 | 3.3 | 1.6 |
+| 15 | 4.8 | 9.9 | 7.5 | 5.0 | 2.4 |
+| 20 | 4.8 | 13.2 | 10.0 | 6.6 | 3.2 |
+| 25 | 4.8 | 16.5 | 12.5 | 8.3 | 4.0 |
+| 30 | 4.8 | 19.8 | 15.0 | 10.0 | 4.8 |
+| 35 | 4.8 | 23.1 | 17.5 | 11.7 | 5.6 |
+
+Line graph showing onboard CCTV storage sizes in TBytes over 35 days for different offload rates. The graph shows that storage size increases with time for all offload rates, but is significantly lower for higher offload percentages. A horizontal orange line represents the 7-day storage limit.
+
+**Figure.7.2.2.1-1. Onboard CCTV storage sizes with different offload rates.**
+
+Next, an example estimation is provided to illustrate the offload performance with different uplink speeds, when the train is commuting from Helsinki to Kemijärvi. The parameters for the calculation are provided in Table 1, whereas the offload results for uplink speeds of 400 Mbps, 750 Mbps and 1000 Mbps are provided respectively in Figure 7.2.2.1-2, Figure 7.2.2.1-3 and in Figure 7.2.2.1-4.
+
+| Station | Arrives | Departs | Stop time | Time between stations |
+|-------------|---------|---------|-----------|-----------------------|
+| HELSINKI | | 18:52 | | |
+| PASILA | 18:57 | 19:00 | 0:03 | 0:08 |
+| TIKKURILA | 19:41 | 19:44 | 0:03 | 0:44 |
+| RIIHIMÄKI | 20:19 | 20:22 | 0:03 | 0:38 |
+| HÄMEENLINNA | 20:46 | 20:48 | 0:02 | 0:26 |
+| TAMPERE | 21:38 | 22:11 | 0:33 | 1:23 |
+| PARKANO | 23:03 | 23:06 | 0:03 | 0:55 |
+| SEINÄJOKI | 0:08 | 0:10 | 0:02 | 1:04 |
+| KOKKOLA | 1:37 | 1:39 | 0:02 | 1:29 |
+| YLIVIESKA | 3:10 | 3:12 | 0:02 | 1:33 |
+
+| | | | | |
+|-----------|------|------|------|------|
+| | | | | |
+| OULU | 4:42 | 5:00 | 0:18 | 1:48 |
+| KEMI | 6:08 | 6:12 | 0:04 | 1:12 |
+| ROVANIEMI | 7:47 | 7:55 | 0:08 | 1:43 |
+| MISI | 8:31 | 8:32 | 0:01 | 0:37 |
+| KEMIJÄRVI | 9:00 | 9:05 | 0:05 | 0:33 |
+
+Table 7.2.2.1-1. The parameters for the offload calculation for the train route between Helsinki and Kemijärvi.
+
+
+
+| Location | Data In (Mbits) | Data Output capacity (Mbits) | Left (Mbits) |
+|-------------|-----------------|------------------------------|--------------|
+| HELSINKI | 0 | 0 | 0 |
+| PASILÄ | 50000 | 100000 | 50000 |
+| TIKKURILA | 150000 | 100000 | 100000 |
+| RIIHIMÄKI | 250000 | 100000 | 150000 |
+| HÄMEENLINNA | 280000 | 100000 | 200000 |
+| TAMPERE | 550000 | 900000 | 350000 |
+| PARKANO | 220000 | 100000 | 150000 |
+| SEINÄJOKI | 380000 | 100000 | 350000 |
+| KOKKOLA | 680000 | 100000 | 650000 |
+| YLIVIESKA | 1000000 | 100000 | 950000 |
+| OULU | 1380000 | 500000 | 880000 |
+| KEMI | 1180000 | 100000 | 1050000 |
+| ROVANIEMI | 1480000 | 200000 | 1250000 |
+| MISI | 1400000 | 100000 | 1380000 |
+| KEMIJÄRVI | 1500000 | 150000 | 1350000 |
+
+Bar chart showing offload results in Mbits for various locations along a train route. The Y-axis represents Mbits from 0,00 to 1600000,00. The X-axis lists locations: HELSINKI, PASILA, TIKKURILA, RIIHIMÄKI, HÄMEENLINNA, TAMPERE, PARKANO, SEINÄJOKI, KOKKOLA, YLIVIESKA, OULU, KEMI, ROVANIEMI, MISI, KEMIJÄRVI. The legend indicates three data series: Data In (blue), Data Output capacity (brown), and Left (red).
+
+Figure 7.2.2.1-2. The offload results with uplink speed of 450 Mbps.
+
+
+
+| Station | Data In (Mbits) | Data Output capacity (Mbits) | Left (Mbits) |
+|-------------|-----------------|------------------------------|--------------|
+| HELSINKI | ~10,000 | ~10,000 | ~10,000 |
+| PASILA | ~10,000 | ~150,000 | ~10,000 |
+| TIKKURILA | ~180,000 | ~150,000 | ~10,000 |
+| RIIHIMÄKI | ~180,000 | ~150,000 | ~10,000 |
+| HÄMEENLINNA | ~150,000 | ~100,000 | ~10,000 |
+| TAMPERE | ~400,000 | ~1450,000 | ~10,000 |
+| PARKANO | ~220,000 | ~100,000 | ~10,000 |
+| SEINÄJOKI | ~350,000 | ~250,000 | ~10,000 |
+| KOKKOLA | ~600,000 | ~500,000 | ~10,000 |
+| YLIVIESKA | ~850,000 | ~800,000 | ~10,000 |
+| OULU | ~1200,000 | ~400,000 | ~10,000 |
+| KEMI | ~700,000 | ~200,000 | ~10,000 |
+| ROVANIEMI | ~900,000 | ~550,000 | ~10,000 |
+| MISI | ~700,000 | ~200,000 | ~10,000 |
+| KEMIJÄRVI | ~800,000 | ~550,000 | ~10,000 |
+
+Bar chart showing offload results for 750 Mbps uplink speed across various stations. The Y-axis is labeled 'Mbits' and ranges from 0,00 to 1600000,00. The X-axis lists stations: HELSINKI, PASILA, TIKKURILA, RIIHIMÄKI, HÄMEENLINNA, TAMPERE, PARKANO, SEINÄJOKI, KOKKOLA, YLIVIESKA, OULU, KEMI, ROVANIEMI, MISI, KEMIJÄRVI. The legend indicates three data series: Data In (blue), Data Output capacity (red), and Left (dark red).
+
+Figure 7.2.2.1-3. The offload results with uplink speed of 750 Mbps.
+
+
+
+| Station | Data In (Mbits) | Data Output capacity (Mbits) | Left (Mbits) |
+|-------------|-----------------|------------------------------|--------------|
+| HELSINKI | ~10,000 | ~10,000 | ~10,000 |
+| PASILA | ~10,000 | ~200,000 | ~10,000 |
+| TIKKURILA | ~200,000 | ~200,000 | ~10,000 |
+| RIIHIMÄKI | ~200,000 | ~200,000 | ~10,000 |
+| HÄMEENLINNA | ~150,000 | ~100,000 | ~10,000 |
+| TAMPERE | ~350,000 | ~2000,000 | ~10,000 |
+| PARKANO | ~250,000 | ~200,000 | ~10,000 |
+| SEINÄJOKI | ~300,000 | ~200,000 | ~10,000 |
+| KOKKOLA | ~500,000 | ~400,000 | ~10,000 |
+| YLIVIESKA | ~800,000 | ~650,000 | ~10,000 |
+| OULU | ~1100,000 | ~1100,000 | ~10,000 |
+| KEMI | ~300,000 | ~250,000 | ~10,000 |
+| ROVANIEMI | ~450,000 | ~450,000 | ~10,000 |
+| MISI | ~150,000 | ~100,000 | ~10,000 |
+| KEMIJÄRVI | ~250,000 | ~300,000 | ~10,000 |
+
+Bar chart showing offload results for 1000 Mbps uplink speed across various stations. The Y-axis is labeled 'Mbits' and ranges from 0,00 to 2500000,00. The X-axis lists stations: HELSINKI, PASILA, TIKKURILA, RIIHIMÄKI, HÄMEENLINNA, TAMPERE, PARKANO, SEINÄJOKI, KOKKOLA, YLIVIESKA, OULU, KEMI, ROVANIEMI, MISI, KEMIJÄRVI. The legend indicates three data series: Data In (blue), Data Output capacity (red), and Left (dark red).
+
+Figure 7.2.2.1-4. The offload results with uplink speed of 1000 Mbps.
+
+### 7.2.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+- Bulk transfer of CCTV archives is performed only when the train stops at the stations.
+- Mobile communication infrastructure between train and ground system enables transfer of CCTV archives from train to the ground system while the train stops at the stations.
+
+- The ground system supports sufficient archiving system for the transferred recordings.
+
+### 7.2.2.3 Service flows
+
+1. The train approaches the station.
+2. Mobile communication system in train establishes connection dedicated for the transfer of CCTV archives with the ground system at a priority level allowing critical communication to continue in parallel
+3. The transfer of CCTV archives is started upon successful connection with the ground system.
+4. The transfer of CCTV archives is stopped when the connection is no longer available.
+
+### 7.2.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+- The on-board CCTV system may re-write over the seven days and older recordings that have been transferred.
+- The on-board mobile communication system remains monitoring the next approach of station.
+
+### 7.2.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-7.2.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to support that CCTV archives can be transferred into the ground system in a time and resource efficient way with a minimum of 1 Gbps in dedicated places such as stations or train depots. | A/T | TS 22.289 | See:
http://www.3gpp.org/technologies/keywords-acronyms/97-lte-advanced
TS 22.289
[R4.1.2-1]
[R4.1.2-2]
[R4.1.2-3]
[R4.1.2-4] |
+| [R-7.2.2-002] | Transferring CCTV archives shall not affect mission critical communication.
NOTE: Transferring CCTV archives is not considered to be a mission critical service. | A/T | TS 22.289 | TS 22.289
[R4.1.2-1]
[R4.1.2-2]
[R4.1.2-3]
[R4.1.2-4] |
+
+## 7.3 Use Case: Massive Inter-carriage data transfer
+
+### 7.3.1 Description
+
+This use case describes the transfer of CCTV archives inside the train from different storages and through Inter-carriage links into the FRMCS node providing the uplink connection with the ground system.
+
+### 7.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+- Mobile communication infrastructure between train and ground system enables transfer of CCTV archives from train to the ground system while the train stops at the stations.
+- The ground system supports sufficient archiving system for the transferred recordings.
+
+- The Inter-carriage links support the same throughput speed as the FRMCS node providing the uplink.
+
+### 7.3.3 Service flows
+
+Mobile communication system in train establishes connection between carriages of the train dedicated for the transfer of CCTV archives to a central node in the train from which the uplink to the ground system will take place.
+
+### 7.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+Recording capacity is freed up in the carriages.
+
+### 7.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------|
+| [R-7.3-001] | The FRMCS System shall facilitate the onboard CCTV communication between carriages of a train, to collect CCTV content at one place on the train for transfer to the ground system. | A/T | 22.289 | CR 22.289
R4.3.1-001-003 |
+| [R-7.3-002] | The onboard CCTV communication between carriages of a train shall not impact mission critical communication
NOTE: Transferring CCTV archives is not considered to be a mission critical service. | A/T | 22.289 | CR 22.289
R4.3.1-001-003 |
+
+## 7.4 Void
+
+## 7.5 On-train outgoing voice communication from train staff towards a ground user related use cases
+
+### 7.5.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to on-train outgoing voice communication from train staff towards a ground user e.g. controller are defined. The following use cases are defined:
+
+- Initiation of on-train outgoing voice communication by the train staff
+- Termination of on-train outgoing voice communication by the train staff
+- Service interworking with GSM-R
+
+## 7.5.2 Use case: Initiation of on-train outgoing voice communication from train staff
+
+### 7.5.2.1 Description
+
+FRMCS User at the train shall be able to initiate a voice communication to any FRMCS User (s) at the ground.
+
+### 7.5.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User, member of the train staff, is authorised to initiate the voice communication.
+
+The FRMCS System is able to retrieve location information of the FRMCS User at the train to address the appropriate FRMCS Users at the ground.
+
+### 7.5.2.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS User at the train (member of the train staff) initiates the voice communication to an FRMCS User at the ground (one or multiple). This kind of voice communication requires the QoS category of NON-CRITICAL VOICE (see [QoS]) within the FRMCS system.
+
+The FRMCS System establishes the voice communication among the FRMCS user(s) within a setup time specified as NORMAL (see [QoS]).
+
+The activated identities to the FRMCS User(s) are presented to all FRMCS Users during the entire voice communication.
+
+This kind of communication can become part of the communication arbitration management.
+
+On demand this voice communication can be recorded for post processing purposes.
+
+If two or more than two FRMCS Users are part of the voice communication, multi talker control applies.
+
+### 7.5.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User at the train is able to communicate to the FRMCS Users at the ground.
+
+### 7.5.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-7.5.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall setup a voice communication between one FRMCS User at the train and one/multiple FRMCS Users on the ground based. The NON-CRITICAL VOICE QoS class shall apply for this kind of communication. | A | 22.179
22.280 | TS 22.179 Floor Control clause 6.2.3.2 Req #1,
TS 22.280 clause 5.1 req # 2 |
+| [R-7.5.2-002] | The location information of the FRMCS User at the train shall be used to locate and address the responsible FRMCS Users on the ground. | A | 22.280 | R-5.6.2.1.2-002
R-5.6.2.4.1-004
R-6.8.8.4.1-006 (Using User regroup, not 5.6.2.4.1-005)
R-6.6.4.2-002b
R-6.6.4.1-XXX User regroup |
+| [R-7.5.2-003] | The FRMCS System shall verify if the FRMCS User at the train as well as the FRMCS Users on the ground are authorised to establish the communication. | A | 22.280 | 5.1.x |
+| [R-7.5.2-004] | The FRMCS System shall establish the voice communication between the FRMCS User at the train and the FRMCS Users on the ground within a setup time specified as NORMAL (see [QoS]). | A | N/A | See section 12.10 below |
+| [R-7.5.2-005] | The FRMCS System shall provide for on-train to one/multiple ground FRMCS User: - - arbitration information to the FRMCS User
- - communication recording
- - Multi-Talker Control.
| A | 22.280 | Arbitration:
[R-5.4.2-004]
[R-5.4.2-004A]
[R-5.4.2-004B]
Multiuser talker control, recording: See relevant section |
+
+## 7.5.3 Use case: Termination of on-train outgoing voice communication from train staff
+
+### 7.5.3.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS User that is member of train staff shall be able to terminate the voice communication towards the FRMCS Users on the ground.
+
+The FRMCS User on the ground shall be able to put on hold, leave or terminate the on-train voice communication.
+
+### 7.5.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The on-train outgoing voice communication is ongoing.
+
+### 7.5.3.3 Service flows
+
+#### **Member of train staff termination**
+
+The FRMCS User that is member of the train staff terminates the voice communication.
+
+The FRMCS system releases the voice communication.
+
+#### **Communication on hold**
+
+A FRMCS User on the ground put the voice communication on hold.
+
+The communication remains active in the FRMCS system and the FRMCS User on the ground user is able to re-join the communication.
+
+#### **Leaving the communication**
+
+The FRMCS User at the ground user is able to leave the voice communication if more than one FRMCS User at the ground is part of the voice communication.
+
+#### **Communication Termination by the ground FRMCS User**
+
+Any FRMCS User on the ground is able to terminate the voice communication between train staff and the ground user.
+
+The FRMCS system releases the voice communication. All involved FRMCS Users are informed about.
+
+### 7.5.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The on-train outgoing voice communication is terminated.
+
+### 7.5.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-7.5.3-001] | The FRMCS System shall allow an authorised FRMCS User at the train that is part of the On-train outgoing voice communication, to terminate the voice communication. | A | 22.280 | 6.4.4 002; 6.4.5 001; 5.1.5 003-008
R-6.4.4-003, R-6.4.4-004
The affiliation mechanism is sufficient to mimic the desired behavior" |
+| [R-7.5.3-002] | Based on the On-train outgoing voice communication termination request, the FRMCS System shall release the voice communication. | A | 22.280 | 6.4.4 002; 6.4.5 001; 5.1.5 003-008
R-6.4.4-003, R-6.4.4-004
The affiliation mechanism is sufficient to mimic the desired behavior" |
+| [R-7.5.3-003] | If authorised, a FRMCS User on the ground shall be able to put the train staff to ground user voice communication on hold if more than one ground FRMCS Users are part of the voice communication. | A | 22.280 | 6.4.4 002; 6.4.5 001; 5.1.5 003-008
R-6.4.4-003, R-6.4.4-004
The affiliation mechanism is sufficient to mimic the desired behavior" |
+| [R-7.5.3-004] | After the FRMCS User has put the voice communication on hold, the communication shall remain active and the FRMCS User on the ground shall be able to re-join the communication. | A | 22.280 | 6.4.4 002; 6.4.5 001; 5.1.5 003-008
R-6.4.4-003, R-6.4.4-004
The affiliation mechanism is sufficient to mimic the desired behavior" |
+| [R-7.5.3-005] | If more than one FRMCS Users on the ground participate to an On-train outgoing voice communication from train staff towards a ground user, the FRMCS User on the ground user shall be able to withdraw from the communication with ability to re-join. The remaining FRMCS Users shall be informed about the withdrawn FRMCS User. | A | 22.280 | 6.4.4 002; 6.4.5 001; 5.1.5 003-008
R-6.4.4-003, R-6.4.4-004
The affiliation mechanism is sufficient to mimic the desired behavior" |
+| [R-7.5.3-006] | If authorised, the FRMCS User at the train or the FRMCS Users on the ground shall be able to terminate the train staff to ground user voice communication. The FRMCS system shall inform the involved FRMCS Users | A | 22.280 | 6.4.4 002; 6.4.5 001; 5.1.5 003-008
R-6.4.4-003, R-6.4.4-004
The affiliation mechanism is sufficient to mimic the desired behavior" |
+
+| | | | | |
+|--|-----------------------------------------|--|--|--|
+| | about the release of the communication. | | | |
+|--|-----------------------------------------|--|--|--|
+
+## 7.5.4 Use case: Service interworking with GSM-R
+
+### 7.5.4.1 Description
+
+For coexistence between FRMCS System and the legacy GSM-R communication system, service interworking among the systems is required.
+
+Depending on the scenario a ground FRMCS User can be attached to the FRMCS system, to the GSM-R system or both. The FRMCS User at the train can be attached either to the GSM-R system or to the FRMCS system.
+
+This use case only applies to an FRMCS Equipment that supports FRMCS System and GSM-R.
+
+### 7.5.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User is either attached to the FRMCS System or to GSM-R.
+
+### 7.5.4.3 Service flows
+
+#### **FRMCS User (Train staff) attached to GSM-R**
+
+When the FRMCS User (member of the train staff) is attached to the GSM-R system and is initiating voice communication to FRMCS Users on the ground, the GSM-R system will route the voice communication to the FRMCS User on the ground accordingly.
+
+If the FRMCS User on the ground is registered to the FRMCS System, the GSM-R system establishes the communication considering the appropriate addressing scheme.
+
+#### **FRMCS User (Train staff) attached to FRMCS System**
+
+When the FRMCS User (member of train staff) is active in the FRMCS system and is initiating voice communication to FRMCS Users on the ground, the FRMCS system will establish the communication considering the appropriate addressing schemes applicable for FRMCS System as well as to GSM-R accordingly.
+
+#### **FRMCS User (Train staff) relocates between GSM-R and FRMCS System/FRMCS System and GSM-R**
+
+When the FRMCS User (train staff) relocates between GSM-R - FRMCS System or vice versa the communication service requires continuation. An interruption of the applicable bearer service is acceptable.
+
+### 7.5.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+The communication continues if the FRMCS User at the train relocates between GSM-R and FRMCS System or vice versa.
+
+### 7.5.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-7.5.4-001] | The FRMCS System shall provide the necessary means to allow FRMCS Users to be reachable from the legacy GSM-R system. | A | 22.179 | Covered in 6.18.4.2 |
+| [R-7.5.4-002] | The FRMCS System shall provide the necessary means to allow FRMCS Users to set up On-train outgoing voice communication including users registered to the GSM-R system. | A | 22.179 | Covered in 6.18.4.2 |
+| [R-7.5.4-003] | When the FRMCS User has to relocate between FRMCS System and GSM-R or vice a versa, the voice communication service shall continue. The interruption of the bearer service associated with the relocating FRMCS User is acceptable.
Note : This requirement applies to FRMCS Equipment that contains FRMCS UE and GSM-R UE capabilities.
| A | N/A | Call has to be re-established by UE. This is UE function outside scope of 3GPP |
+
+## 7.6 Real-time video communication (video conferencing) related use cases
+
+### 7.6.1 Introduction
+
+A real-time video communication (video conferencing) can be used to support railway operations, such as maintenance staff when investigating infrastructure or vehicles components where help is needed from other staff or during testing of infrastructure or vehicles.
+
+Real-time video communication (video conferencing) is supported by the FRMCS System. That encompasses user-to-user as well as multiuser video communication, including audio, and is applicable to On-network only.
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to real-time video communication (video conferencing) are described. The following use cases are identified:
+
+- An FRMCS User initiates a video conference
+- An FRMCS User leaves and re-joins a video conference
+- An FRMCS User terminates a video conference
+- An FRMCS User changes from a video conference to a voice-only conference
+- An FRMCS User changes from a voice-only conference to a video conference
+
+- An FRMCS User joins an ongoing video conference
+
+## 7.6.2 Use case: Initiation of video conference
+
+### 7.6.2.1 Description
+
+An FRMCS User is able to set up a video conference to other FRMCS User(s). This encompasses transmission of synchronized video and audio information under conditions.
+
+### 7.6.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The initiating FRMCS User is authorised to initiate a video conference.
+
+The receiving FRMCS User(s) is(are) authorised to use video conference.
+
+### 7.6.2.3 Service flows
+
+An authorised FRMCS User initiates a video conference that corresponds to the application category VIDEO (see QoS chapter).
+
+The FRMCS System determines the FRMCS User(s) to be included in the communication, based on:
+
+- Selection by the initiating FRMCS User, or
+- Location of all FRMCS Users, and/or
+- Functional identity of all FRMCS Users, and/or
+- System configuration.
+
+The FRMCS system establishes the bearer service(s) required for the video conference within a setup time applicable to application category VIDEO (see QoS chapter). FRMCS User(s) are using their registered functional identities and provide furthermore their location.
+
+The FRMCS System assigns a certain priority of the video conference.
+
+The receiving FRMCS User(s) is able to accept, reject, or ignore the incoming video conference.
+
+The involved FRMCS Users are able to select which video content is to be presented (at both sender and receiver sides).
+
+The FRMCS System records the communication of the initiating and receiving FRMCS Users.
+
+### 7.6.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+Real-time video (synchronized video and audio information) can be transmitted and received among authorised FRMCS Users involved in the ongoing video conference.
+
+### 7.6.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+This use case is not in the scope of current normative work.
+
+A decision has to be taken to consider a fully OTT solution, or if MCVideo current group communications functionality are sufficient, or if MMTel conference could be used, or if we need a new technical study on MCVideo conferencing.
+
+It is recommended that MCVideo Service (MCVideo group communications as stated in TS 22.281) or MCData Service using IP connectivity (MCData group communications as stated in TS 22.282) and Functional Alias to reach MCX Users as 3GPP building blocks to support Real-time video communication (video conferencing) related use cases.
+
+## 7.6.3 Use case: Leave and re-join a video conference
+
+### 7.6.3.1 Description
+
+An FRMCS User is able to leave and re-join an ongoing video conference under conditions.
+
+### 7.6.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The video conference is ongoing.
+
+The FRMCS User is authorised to leave and re-join an ongoing video conference.
+
+### 7.6.3.3 Service flows
+
+The authorised FRMCS User is able to leave the video conference while receiving a new incoming communication or initiating another outgoing communication. The other involved FRMCS User(s) are informed and can continue the ongoing video conference if the number of remaining participants is sufficient.
+
+The authorised FRMCS Users is then able to re-join the video conference.
+
+The ongoing video conference is terminated if the number of remaining participants is not sufficient.
+
+### 7.6.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The authorised FRMCS User has left the ongoing video conference.
+
+### 7.6.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+This use case is not in the scope of current normative work.
+
+A decision has to be taken to consider a fully OTT solution, or if MCVideo current group communications functionality are sufficient, or if MMTel conference could be used, or if we need a new technical study on MCVideo conferencing.
+
+It is recommended that MCVideo Service (MCVideo group communications as stated in TS 22.281) or MCData Service using IP connectivity (MCData group communications as stated in TS 22.282) and Functional Alias to reach MCX Users as 3GPP building blocks to support Real-time video communication (video conferencing) related use cases.
+
+## 7.6.4 Void
+
+## 7.6.5 Use case: Termination of a video conference
+
+### 7.6.5.1 Description
+
+Any authorised FRMCS User is able to terminate an ongoing video conference.
+
+### 7.6.5.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The video conference is ongoing.
+
+The FRMCS User is authorised to terminate an ongoing video conference.
+
+### 7.6.5.3 Service flows
+
+The authorised FRMCS User is able to terminate the video conference. The involved FRMCS User(s) are informed and the video conference is terminated.
+
+### 7.6.5.4 Post-conditions
+
+The authorised FRMCS User has terminated the ongoing video conference.
+
+### 7.6.5.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+This use case is not in the scope of current normative work.
+
+A decision has to be taken to consider a fully OTT solution, or if MCVideo current group communications functionality are sufficient, or if MMTel conference could be used, or if we need a new technical study on MCVideo conferencing.
+
+It is recommended that MCVideo Service (MCVideo group communications as stated in TS 22.281) or MCData Service using IP connectivity (MCData group communications as stated in TS 22.282) and Functional Alias to reach MCX Users as 3GPP building blocks to support Real-time video communication (video conferencing) related use cases.
+
+## 7.6.6 Use case: Changes from a video conference to a voice-only conference
+
+### 7.6.6.1 Description
+
+Any authorised FRMCS User is able to change from a video conference to a voice-only conference only.
+
+### 7.6.6.2 Pre-conditions
+
+There is an ongoing video conference.
+
+The initiating FRMCS User is authorised to change from a video conference to a voice-only conference.
+
+The initiating FRMCS User is authorised to initiate voice-only conference.
+
+### 7.6.6.3 Service flows
+
+An authorised FRMCS User initiates the change from a video conference to a voice-only conference.
+
+The FRMCS System determines if the change can be proceeded, based on:
+
+- Authorisation from initiating FRMCS User, and/or
+- Authorisation from receiving FRMCS User(s), and/or
+- System configuration.
+
+The FRMCS system establishes the bearer service required for the voice-only conference within a setup time applicable to application category CRITICAL VOICE or VOICE (see QoS chapter). FRMCS User(s) are using their registered functional identities and provide furthermore their location.
+
+The FRMCS System assigns a certain priority of the voice-only conference.
+
+The receiving FRMCS User(s) shall be able to accept, reject or ignore the change to a voice-only conference.
+
+The bearer service required for the video conference is maintained under conditions (e.g. timer) to allow FRMCS Users to return to the video conference.
+
+The receiving FRMCS User(s) are notified that a change from video conference to voice-only conference has been initiated by the authorised FRMCS User.
+
+The FRMCS System records the communication of the initiating and receiving FRMCS Users.
+
+#### 7.6.6.4 Post-conditions
+
+After the change from video conference to voice-only conference, the FRMCS Users are not able to transmit and receive video anymore.
+
+#### 7.6.6.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+This use case is not in the scope of current normative work.
+
+A decision has to be taken to consider a fully OTT solution, or if MCVideo current group communications functionality are sufficient, or if MMTel conference could be used, or if we need a new technical study on MCVideo conferencing.
+
+It is recommended that MCVideo Service (MCVideo group communications as stated in TS 22.281) or MCData Service using IP connectivity (MCData group communications as stated in TS 22.282) and Functional Alias to reach MCX Users as 3GPP building blocks to support Real-time video communication (video conferencing) related use cases.
+
+### 7.6.7 Use case: Change from a voice-only conference to a video conference
+
+#### 7.6.7.1 Description
+
+Any authorised FRMCS User is able to change from a voice-only conference to a video conference.
+
+#### 7.6.7.2 Pre-conditions
+
+There is an ongoing voice-only conference.
+
+The initiating FRMCS User is authorised to change from a voice-only conference to a video conference.
+
+The initiating FRMCS User is authorised to initiate a video conference.
+
+#### 7.6.7.3 Service flows
+
+An authorised FRMCS User initiates the change from a voice-only conference to a video conference.
+
+The FRMCS System determines if the change can be proceeded, based on:
+
+- Authorisation from initiating FRMCS User, and/or
+- Authorisation from receiving FRMCS User(s), and/or
+- System configuration.
+
+The FRMCS system establishes the bearer service required for the video conference within a setup time applicable to application category VIDEO (see QoS chapter). FRMCS User(s) are using their registered functional identities and provide furthermore their location.
+
+The FRMCS System assigns a certain priority of the video conference.
+
+The receiving FRMCS User(s) is able to accept, reject or ignore the change to a video conference.
+
+The bearer service required for the voice-only conference is maintained under conditions (e.g. timer) to allow FRMCS Users to return to the voice-only conference.
+
+The receiving FRMCS User(s) are notified that a change has been initiated by the authorised FRMCS User.
+
+The FRMCS System records the communication of the initiating and receiving FRMCS Users.
+
+#### 7.6.7.4 Post-conditions
+
+After the change from voice-only conference to video conference, the FRMCS Users are able to transmit and receive video and audio.
+
+#### 7.6.7.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+This use case is not in the scope of current normative work.
+
+A decision has to be taken to consider a fully OTT solution, or if MCVideo current group communications functionality are sufficient, or if MMTel conference could be used, or if we need a new technical study on MCVideo conferencing.
+
+It is recommended that MCVideo Service (MCVideo group communications as stated in TS 22.281) or MCData Service using IP connectivity (MCData group communications as stated in TS 22.282) and Functional Alias to reach MCX Users as 3GPP building blocks to support Real-time video communication (video conferencing) related use cases.
+
+### 7.6.8 Use case: Join an ongoing video conference
+
+#### 7.6.8.1 Description
+
+Any authorised FRMCS User is able to join an ongoing video conference under conditions.
+
+#### 7.6.8.2 Pre-conditions
+
+There is an ongoing video conference.
+
+An FRMCS User is authorised to join an ongoing video conference.
+
+#### 7.6.8.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS System determines if the authorised FRMCS User can join an ongoing video conference, based on:
+
+- Selection/Invitation by the initiating FRMCS User of the ongoing video conference, or
+- Location of all FRMCS Users, and/or
+- Functional identity of all FRMCS Users, and/or
+- System configuration.
+
+The authorised FRMCS User joins an ongoing video conference.
+
+The involved FRMCS User(s) are notified that an FRMCS User has joined the ongoing video conference. FRMCS User(s) are using their registered functional identities and provide furthermore their location.
+
+#### 7.6.8.4 Post-conditions
+
+The authorised FRMCS User has joined the ongoing video conference. All involved FRMCS Users of the ongoing video conference are able to transmit and receive video and audio.
+
+### 7.6.8.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+This use case is not in the scope of current normative work.
+
+A decision has to be taken to consider a fully OTT solution, or if MCVideo current group communications functionality are sufficient, or if MMTel conference could be used, or if we need a new technical study on MCVideo conferencing.
+
+It is recommended that MCVideo Service (MCVideo group communications as stated in TS 22.281) or MCData Service using IP connectivity (MCData group communications as stated in TS 22.282) and Functional Alias to reach MCX Users as 3GPP building blocks to support Real-time video communication (video conferencing) related use cases.
+
+---
+
+## 8 Business communication applications related use cases
+
+### 8.1 Multimedia applications related use cases
+
+#### 8.1.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter, the following use cases related to Multimedia applications are defined:
+
+- Live streaming of multimedia
+- Bulk transfer of multimedia data bases from ground to train
+
+### 8.2 Use Case: Live streaming of multimedia
+
+#### 8.2.1 Description
+
+This use case describes the live streaming of multimedia content from ground to train.
+
+#### 8.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+- FRMCS User equipment is registered into the FRMCS System.
+- Passengers can access live streaming services through the FRMCS System in the train.
+
+#### 8.2.3 Service flows
+
+1. FRMCS System provides data communication for the live streaming services.
+2. FRMCS User equipment requests data communication for the live streaming services from the FRMCS System.
+3. FRMCS System allocates requested data communication for the FRMCS User equipment.
+4. FRMCS User equipment allocates the communication to the passengers.
+
+#### 8.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+FRMCS User equipment deregisters from the FRMCS System upon the reception of live streaming is ceased.
+
+## 8.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-8.2.5-001] | The FRMCS System SHALL enable bandwidth for the live streaming inside the train through the FRMCS System. | | 22.261 | Live streaming service covered by 22.261 Table 7.1-1. |
+| [R-8.2.5-002] | The FRMCS User equipment SHALL be able to balance the bandwidth between the passengers. | | 22.261 | Live streaming service covered by 22.261 Table 7.1-1. |
+
+NOTE: Live streaming of multimedia from ground to train is not considered to be a mission critical service.
+
+## 8.3 Use Case: Bulk transfer of multimedia from ground to train
+
+### 8.3.1 Description
+
+This use case describes the transfer of multimedia databases from ground to train. The multimedia may contain movies, TV shows, cached webpages etc.
+
+Figure 1 illustrates an example calculation of upload time of movies with different bitrates, when 1-100 movies are uploaded, and the upload speed is 1 Gbps.
+
+
+
+| Number of movies | 1 Mbps | 2 Mbps | 3 Mbps | 4 Mbps | 5 Mbps |
+|------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
+| 1 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 3.0 |
+| 2 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 6.0 |
+| 3 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 5.4 | 7.2 | 9.0 |
+| 4 | 2.4 | 4.8 | 7.2 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
+| 5 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 12.0 | 15.0 |
+| 6 | 3.6 | 7.2 | 10.8 | 14.4 | 18.0 |
+| 7 | 4.2 | 8.4 | 12.6 | 16.8 | 21.0 |
+| 8 | 4.8 | 9.6 | 14.4 | 19.2 | 24.0 |
+| 9 | 5.4 | 10.8 | 16.2 | 21.6 | 27.0 |
+| 10 | 6.0 | 12.0 | 18.0 | 24.0 | 30.0 |
+| 20 | 12.0 | 24.0 | 36.0 | 48.0 | 60.0 |
+| 30 | 18.0 | 36.0 | 54.0 | 72.0 | 90.0 |
+| 40 | 24.0 | 48.0 | 72.0 | 96.0 | 120.0 |
+| 50 | 30.0 | 60.0 | 90.0 | 120.0 | 150.0 |
+| 100 | 60.0 | 120.0 | 180.0 | 240.0 | 300.0 |
+
+Bar chart titled 'Upload time with 1 Gbps upload rate' showing upload time in minutes for 1 to 100 movies at bitrates of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Mbps. The x-axis represents the number of movies (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100) and the y-axis represents time in minutes (0 to 60). The legend indicates five bitrates: 1 Mbps (blue), 2 Mbps (red), 3 Mbps (green), 4 Mbps (purple), and 5 Mbps (cyan). The chart shows that upload time increases linearly with the number of movies and is significantly higher for higher bitrates. For example, at 100 movies, the upload times are approximately 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 minutes for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Mbps respectively.
+
+Figure 8.3.1-1. An example calculation of upload time of movies with different bitrates and 1 Gbps upload speed.
+
+### 8.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+FRMCS System enables transfer of multimedia databases from ground to train while the train stops at the stations or is at the depot.
+
+### 8.3.3 Service flows
+
+1. Train has stopped at the station or at the depot and
+2. FRMCS User equipment responsible for the bandwidth allocation for the transfer of on-board multimedia database is registered into the FRMCS System
+3. FRMCS User equipment asks from FRMCS System to allocate needed bandwidth for the transfer of the multimedia database upon request by the content server.
+
+### 8.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+FRMCS User equipment responsible for the bandwidth allocation for the transfer of on-board multimedia database de-registers from the FRMCS System.
+
+### 8.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|------------------------|
+| [R-8.3.5-001] | For the sufficient transfer of large sized multimedia databases, the FRMCS System SHALL support throughput speed minimum of 1 Gbps. | | 22.289
22.261 | TS 22.289 [R4.2.2-2] s |
+
+NOTE: Bulk transfer of multimedia from ground to train is not considered to be a mission critical service.
+
+---
+
+## 9 Critical support applications related use cases
+
+### 9.1 Overview
+
+Critical applications are essential for train movements, safety, shunting, presence, trackside maintenance, legal aspects such as emergency communications, etc.
+
+### 9.2 Assured voice communication (AVC)
+
+#### 9.2.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to the function of assured voice communication are defined. Assured Voice Communication (AVC) shall provide an indication to FRMCS Users as soon as a voice communication link is interrupted. It is invoked on an existing voice communication between two or more FRMCS Users.
+
+The following use cases are defined:
+
+- Invocation of AVC
+- Stopping AVC
+- Degradation of a communication link (e.g. bad quality of the signal quality or interruption of a communication link)
+
+- Extension of AVC
+
+## 9.2.2 Use case: Invocation of Assured Voice Communication
+
+### 9.2.2.1 Description
+
+This use case describes the invocation of Assured Voice Communication.
+
+### 9.2.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+A FRMCS User is part of a voice communication with one or more FRMCS Users for which Assured Voice Communication can be invoked either automatically or manually.
+
+### 9.2.2.3 Service flows
+
+#### Automatic Invocation
+
+Upon establishment of a voice communication for which automatic AVC is activated, AVC will be invoked by the FRMCS System.
+
+The involved FRMCS Users are informed about the successful activation of AVC.
+
+#### Manual Invocation
+
+The user invokes AVC in the FRMCS System.
+
+The involved FRMCS Users are informed about the successful activation of AVC.
+
+### 9.2.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The voice communication links of all FRMCS Users involved in the communication are supervised.
+
+### 9.2.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.2.2-001] | Upon establishment of a voice communication for which automatic AVC is activated, AVC shall be invoked by the FRMCS System. | A | 22.280 | R-6.2.1-001
But the AVC remains as OTT application while 3GPP building block provides the enabling framework." |
+| [R-9.2.2-002] | If entitled, a FRMCS User shall be able to invoke AVC manually. | A | 22.280 | MCX Services take the approach that all communication are acknowledged and the MCPTT User is given the choice to proceed without acknowledgement 22.280
R-6.2.1-010 |
+
+## 9.2.3 Use case: Stopping Assured Voice Communication
+
+### 9.2.3.1 Description
+
+This use case describes the deactivation of the communication link supervision.
+
+### 9.2.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+A FRMCS User is part of a voice communication with one or more FRMCS Users for which Assured Voice Communication was invoked.
+
+### 9.2.3.3 Service flows
+
+#### Automatic stopping
+
+If the ongoing voice communication is terminated by one of the involved users, the Assured Voice Communication is stopped.
+
+The involved FRMCS Users are informed about the successful stop of AVC.
+
+#### Manual stopping
+
+The FRMCS User who has previously manually invoked AVC may stop AVC.
+
+The involved FRMCS Users are informed about the successful stop of AVC.
+
+### 9.2.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+#### Automatic stopping
+
+The FRMCS User is no longer part of a voice communication with one or more FRMCS Users.
+
+#### Manual stopping
+
+The FRMCS User is still part of a voice communication with one or more FRMCS Users.
+
+### 9.2.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.2.3-001] | If the voice communication is terminated stopping of AVC shall be done by the FRMCS System automatically. | A | N/A | Implicit as done on burst basis |
+| [R-9.2.3-002] | Only the FRMCS User who requested the end-to-end supervision shall be able to stop AVC. | A | 22.280 | Communication is acknowledged on a per talk burst basis so stopping that ack processing can be done by
R-6.2.1-008
R-6.2.1-010" |
+
+## 9.2.4 Use case: Degradation of a communication link
+
+### 9.2.4.1 Description
+
+Alternative 1: The FRMCS System provides a so called negative notification to the FRMCS Users as soon as voice communication link is interrupted.
+
+Alternative 2: A positive notification will be given by the FRMCS System as long as the voice communication link is unaffected.
+
+#### 9.2.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+A FRMCS User is part of a voice communication with one or more FRMCS Users.
+
+AVC is invoked on all links of the voice communication.
+
+#### 9.2.4.3 Service flows
+
+##### Positive Notification
+
+The FRMCS System continuously checks whether the voice communication links are unaffected (e.g. bad quality of the signal quality or interruption of a communication link).
+
+The FRMCS System indicates to all FRMCS Users involved in the voice communication service is working properly e.g. by a periodic audio signal.
+
+If an interruption of at least one of the communication links is detected, the positive notification is immediately stopped.
+
+If AVC itself fails, the positive notification shall be stopped immediately.
+
+Active speech transmission shall suppress the positive notification to all FRMCS Users involved.
+
+Optionally all FRMCS Users have to confirm their availability periodically (e.g. by pressing a button or by talking). If this confirmation is not received, AVC shall be stopped immediately.
+
+A FRMCS User terminating his participation in the voice communication shall immediately stop AVC.
+
+When AVC is stopped the ongoing voice communication is continued. Assured Voice Communication may be reinvoked for the remaining FRMCS Users of the ongoing voice communication.
+
+##### Negative Notification
+
+The FRMCS System continuously checks whether the voice communication links are unaffected (e.g. bad quality of the signal quality or interruption of a communication link).
+
+If a degradation of a voice communication link is detected the FRMCS System warns all involved FRMCS Users, e.g. by generating a warning audio signal. If possible, the FRMCS User with the interrupted communication link shall also be warned.
+
+If AVC itself fails, the negative notification shall be given immediately e.g. by a warning tone.
+
+A FRMCS User terminating his participation in the voice communication shall stop AVC and a negative notification shall be given immediately e.g. by a warning tone.
+
+Optionally all FRMCS Users have to confirm their availability periodically (e.g. by pressing a button or by talking). If this confirmation is not received, AVC shall be stopped and a negative notification shall be given immediately e.g. by a warning tone.
+
+When AVC is stopped the ongoing voice communication is continued. Assured Voice Communication may be reinvoked for the remaining FRMCS Users of the ongoing voice communication.
+
+#### 9.2.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+The voice communication between the remaining FRMCS Users continues.
+
+#### 9.2.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.2.4-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to continuously supervise the voice communication links to all involved FRMCS Users. | A | 22.280
22.179 | Result of this supervision is provided by
22.179 6.2.1-001-010
22.280 5.20.2-001 |
+| [R-9.2.4-001a] | The FRMCS System shall be able to provide indications to AVC on the signal quality of the link/connection to take decision to maintain a reliable communication path. | T | 22.261 | Covered by QoS monitoring. |
+| [R-9.2.4-002] | If a degradation of a voice communication link is detected, the remaining FRMCS Users shall be informed. The ongoing voice communication among the remaining FRMCS Users shall continue.
A FRMCS User quitting the communication shall cause the AVC to stop. | A | 22.280
22.179 | Done by
22.179 6.2.1-001-010
22.280 5.20.2-001
Supervision is done on a per talk burst basis, if user drops out or de-affiliates during the burst 22.280 5.20.2-001 takes effect, if user drop out between the bursts this will be noticed during the ack process as described in 22.179 6.2.1-001-010 |
+| [R-9.2.4-003] | The FRMCS System shall be able to inform the FRMCS Users of an interrupted voice communication link by either positive or negative notification. | A | 22.179 | R-6.2.1-008
R-6.2.1-009 |
+| [R-9.2.4-004] | In case of positive notification all FRMCS Users shall receive a periodic audio signal while no voice communication is ongoing. Active speech transmission shall suppress the positive notification. | A | 22.280
22.179" | Information conveyed to UE by
22.179 6.2.1-001-010
22.280 5.20.2-001R-6.2.1-002
how this information is presented to the user is user I/F design, due to the talk burst nature of the communication it does not make sense while not talking to have that indication
It rather should be notified at the set-up that certain users did not acknowledge see
22.179 6.2.1-010 |
+| [R-9.2.4-005] | In case of negative notification all FRMCS Users shall receive an audio signal when an interrupted voice communication link is detected, the AVC has failed or a FRMCS terminated his participation in the voice communication. | A | 22.280
22.179" | Information conveyed to UE by
22.179 6.2.1-001-010
22.280 5.20.2-001R-6.2.1-002
how this information is presented to the user is user I/F design, due to the talk burst nature of the communication it does not make sense while not talking to have that indication
It rather should be notified at the set-up that certain users did not acknowledge see
22.179 6.2.1-010a |
+| [R-9.2.4-006] | Negative notification shall be | A | 22.280 | Information conveyed to UE |
+
+| | | | | |
+|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| | stopped after acknowledgement by all remaining FRMCS Users in the voice communication. | | 22.179" | by
22.179 6.2.1-001-010
22.280 5.20.2-001R-6.2.1-002
how this information is presented to the user is user I/F design, due to the talk burst nature of the communication it does not make sense while not talking to have that indication It rather should be notified at the set-up that certain users did not acknowledge see 22.179 6.2.1-010a |
+|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+
+## 9.2.5 Use case: Extension of Assured Voice Communication
+
+### 9.2.5.1 Description
+
+The assured voice communication application shall provide the ability to extend an assured voice communication to a user who has joined an ongoing communication.
+
+### 9.2.5.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The use of Assured Voice Communication is activated for the ongoing voice communication.
+
+### 9.2.5.3 Service flows
+
+If a user joins an ongoing assured voice communication, the initiator of the assured voice communication is informed. The joining user is not supervised yet but is part of the communication.
+
+The initiator shall have the option to extend the assured voice communication to this new user.
+
+### 9.2.5.4 Post-conditions
+
+If the assured voice communication is extended, the new user is supervised by the assured voice communication.
+
+If the assured voice communication is not extended to the new user, the new user is not supervised by the assured voice communication but remains part of the existing ongoing communication.
+
+### 9.2.5.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.2.5-001] | The initiator shall be able to extend the AVC to a new FRMCS User in the communication. | A | 22.280 | This is done automatically due to the talk burst nature and the Automatic user regrouping in 22.280 6.6.4.2.
Question is whether this always makes sense if the group membership changes frequently from talk burst to talk burst
For this reason, a requirement is added allowing to exclude such automatic user regrouping groups from the ack mechanism in general. |
+
+## 9.3 Functional identities and role management
+
+### 9.3.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to functional identities and role management are defined:
+
+- Registration to a functional identity
+- Deregistration of a functional identity
+- FRMCS User changing functional identity
+- User log-in to the system
+- User log-out from the system
+- Presentation of identities
+- Interrogation of identities within a certain context
+
+Examples of Role management, like functional identities, FRMCS Equipment Identities, etc. in the railway environment are covered by annex A.
+
+### 9.3.2 General pre-conditions
+
+In order to fully understand the uses cases in this chapter, Figure 9.3.2-1 illustrates the different steps required to complete the registration process.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start[UE Power on] --> AppStart[Start FRMCS application]
+ AppStart --> EquipLogin[FRMCS Equipment login]
+ EquipLogin --> InitEquip[Initialize Equipment Type]
+
+ InitEquip --> RegFuncEquip[Register to functional identity related to an equipment]
+ RegFuncEquip --> FuncAddedEquip[Functional identity added]
+ FuncAddedEquip --> UserLogin[User login dialog]
+
+ InitEquip --> UserLogin
+
+ UserLogin --> FRMCSUser[FRMCS User (FRMCS User identity)]
+ FRMCSUser --> RegFuncUser[Register to functional identity]
+ RegFuncUser --> FuncAddedUser[Functional identity added]
+ FuncAddedUser --> RegComp[Registration Completed]
+
+ RegComp --> InitEquip
+
+ subgraph EquipmentTypes [Equipment Types]
+ TypeA[Type a]
+ TypeB[Type b]
+ TypeC[Type c]
+ end
+
+ InitEquip --> TypeA
+ InitEquip --> TypeB
+ InitEquip --> TypeC
+
+```
+
+A complex flowchart illustrating Role management in FRMCS. It shows a sequence of steps from UE Power on, through equipment initialization, registration of functional identities, and user login. The flow includes decision points and loops for different equipment types and user scenarios.
+
+**Figure 9.3.2-1: Example of Role management**
+
+In this definition, it is needed to make a distinction between different types of FRMCS Equipment. The following are, as a principle, defined:
+
+- a) FRMCS Equipment without MMI, without the possibility to be addressed via a functional identity related to the equipment (e.g. sensor in the track or simple modem operation)
+- b) FRMCS Equipment that can be registered to a functional identity related to the equipment (e.g. maintenance log collecting device connected to a power station) but without other FRMCS User login
+
+- c) FRMCS Equipment that can be registered to a functional identity and that allows a FRMCS User to login and register to functional identities related to the user (e.g. cab radio)
+- d) FRMCS Equipment that cannot register to a functional identity, but that allows a FRMS User to login and to register to functional identities related to the user (e.g. a generic handheld device)
+
+Steps:
+
+1. UE-Power on: The UE has started up and is attached to the FRMCS network on telecoms level. The UE is reachable via its subscriber identity address.
+2. Start FRMCS Application: On the UE the FRMCS Application start up and is ready for use.
+3. FRMCS Equipment login: The FRMCS Application is logging in into the FRMCS System and the FRMCS Equipment becomes known to the FRMCS System.
+4. Initialise FRMCS Equipment type: the type of FRMCS Equipment used is identified.
+
+At this stage of the user flow four different routes can be followed, based on the determined FRMCS Equipment type of the FRMCS Equipment.
+
+Type a) “sensor”:
+
+- No action required. The FRMCS Equipment is now reachable via its subscriber identity address.
+
+After this step the process of registration is completed.
+
+Type b) “Announcement System”:
+
+- Register to a functional identity: the FRMCS Equipment will request for a registration on a functional number. This functional number is related to the equipment and identifies the device, like a PA system on a train.
+- Functional identity added: the request for a functional identity is granted by the FRMCS System. The end user device is now reachable via its functional identity.
+
+After this step the process of registration is completed.
+
+Type c) “cab radio”:
+
+- Register to a functional identity: the FRMCS Equipment will request for a registration on a functional identity. This functional identity is related to the FRMCS Equipment and identifies the environment where the equipment is used, like a cab radio in a cabin of a train.
+- Functional identity added: The FRMCS User is now only reachable via all of its functional identities related to the FRMCS Equipment.
+
+Type d) “Handheld”:
+
+Next, for both the types c) and d) the following steps apply:
+
+- User login dialog: the user is presented with a log-in MMI action. The user can now login into the FRMCS System. By successfully logging into the FRMCS System the user becomes a FRMCS User.
+- FRMCS User: The FRMCS User is now reachable via its FRMCS User Identity (and in case c) the functional identity registered by the FRMCS Equipment).
+- Register to a functional identity: the FRMCS User may request for a registration on a functional identity. This functional identity relates to the FRMCS User and identifies the role of the FRMCS User e.g. driver, controller etc. and the environment e.g. train number.
+
+- Functional identity added: The FRMCS User is now reachable via all the functional identities registered to the user (Further, the FRMCS Equipment is reachable via its registered functional identity(ies)).
+
+After this step the process of registration is completed.
+
+Note: Use cases related to power up the UE until complete initialisation of the equipment type are covered in chapter 5.
+
+### 9.3.2.1 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.3.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to make use of the underlying transport system's subscriber identities. | A | 22.280 | This requirement can be supported by existing MCCore requirements. |
+| [R-9.3.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall support a FRMCS User identity per FRMCS User. | A | 22.280 | This requirement can be supported by existing MCCore requirements. |
+| [R-9.3.2-003] | The FRMCS System shall support functional identities. | A | 22.280 | This requirement is partly covered by MCCore, new and additional types of identities need to be supported. |
+| [R-9.3.2-004] | The UE shall be reachable by its subscriber identity. | A | 22.280 | This requirement can be supported by existing 3GPP requirements. |
+| [R-9.3.2-004a] | The FRMCS system shall be able to inhibit the use of the underlying transport system's subscriber identities for communication | A | 22.280 | Implicit.
[R-5.12-002] The MCX Service supports MCX Service User ID + functional alias, independent of subscriber identity assigned by 3GPP operator to UE. |
+| [R-9.3.2-005] | The FRMCS User shall be reachable by its FRMCS User identity. | A | 22.280 | This requirement can be supported by existing MCCore requirements. |
+| [R-9.3.2-006] | The FRMCS User shall be reachable by its functional identity/ies. | A | 22.280 | This requirement is partly covered by MCCore, new and additional types of identities need to be supported. |
+| [R-9.3.2-007] | At the time of initialisation the FRMCS-system shall be able to determine the FRMCS Equipment Type. | A | N/A | Outside scope of 3GPP standardization. |
+
+## 9.3.3 Use case: Registration to a functional identity
+
+### 9.3.3.1 Description
+
+A FRMCS User or the FRMCS Equipment shall be able to register to one or multiple functional identities. A functional identity can therefore be equipment related or user related.
+
+### 9.3.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The equipment type is identified.
+
+Functional registration of the user, the user is logged in into the FRMCS System.
+
+### 9.3.3.3 Service flows
+
+#### **Requested functional identity is not in use**
+
+The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment selects the functional identity. The identity can be selected from a list based on the location of the FRMCS User, operational schedules, etc. or the functional identity can be entered manually.
+
+The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment requests the FRMCS System to register the new functional identity.
+
+The FRMCS System informs the FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment about the outcome of the registration request.
+
+#### **Requested functional identity that is in use**
+
+The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment selects the functional identity. The identity can be selected from a list based on the location of the FRMCS User, operational schedules, etc. or the functional identity can be entered manually.
+
+The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment requests the FRMCS System to register the new functional identity.
+
+The FRMCS User is or the FRMCS-equipment informed of the functional identity already in use.
+
+The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment shall be able to select from the following options:
+
+- Cancel the registration
+- If the selected functional identity allows take over the functional identity.
+- If the selected functional identity allows register as an additional FRMCS User to this functional identity.
+
+The FRMCS System informs the FRMCS User about the outcome of the registration request.
+
+In the case of taking over a functional identity, the FRMCS System deregisters the other FRMCS User or FRMCS-equipment from this particular functional identity. The deregistered FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment gets informed about the deregistration by the FRMCS System.
+
+#### **Registration by the Railway Subsystem of the FRMCS System**
+
+Based on the user identification, operational conditions, like schedules when entering the train, location, time, recent activity etc., the Railway Subsystem shall be able automatically register a FRMCS User or an FRMCS Equipment to a functional identity.
+
+The FRMCS User gets informed about the registration by the FRMCS System.
+
+### 9.3.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+In case of successful registration, the FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment can be reached based on the functional identity. The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment can be registered to different functional identities. The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment are also reachable by using the FRMCS Equipment Identity, the FRMCS User Identity (if logged in) and its subscriber identity.
+
+In case of successful registration and based on system configuration, the FRMCS System shall be able to notify a specific group of FRMCS User(s) registered to functional identity(ies) with similarities in the structure of the successfully registered functional identity.
+
+If the FRMCS System has not accepted the registration, the FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment cannot be reached on a particular functional identity.
+
+### 9.3.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.3.3-001] | The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment shall be able to register to a functional identity. | A | TS 22.280 | 5.9a2 |
+| [R-9.3.3-002] | To select from, the FRMCS System shall provide the FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment a list of functional identities. The list contains functional identities based on a certain context, like location of the user, operational schedule, etc. The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment shall also be able to perform a registration of an unlisted functional identity. | A | TS 22.280 | .Predefined list of functional identities based on criteria: [R-5.9a-004]
.Unlisted functional identity: [R-5.9a-010] |
+| [R-9.3.3-003] | The FRMCS System shall inform the FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment of the outcome of the registration request. | A | TS 22.280 | [R-5.9a-025] |
+| [R-9.3.3-004] | In the case the functional identity is already in use, the FRMCS System shall advise the FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment about options to - cancel the registration,
- take over the functional identity
- register as an additional identity.
| A | TS 22.280 | Covered.
[R-5.9a-007]: sharing FA first (no user selection), then
[R-5.9a-008]: take over (with user selection). If take over not selected, registration considered canceled. |
+| [R-9.3.3-005] | The FRMCS System shall be able to register a FRMCS-user or the Railway Subsystem without human intervention. For example, automatic registration can be initiated by: - user identification
- operational conditions, like schedules when entering the train (for example by using Near Field Communication, Smart Card etc.)
- location
- time
- recent activity
- Smart cards or RFID tokens in the vicinity of the UE
- FRMCS Equipment Type
- etc.
| A | TS 22.280 | [R-5.9a-015]
[R-5.9a-018] |
+| [R-9.3.3-006] | The FRMCS System shall support multiple functional identities per FRMCS User or FRMCS Equipment. | A | TS 22.280 | [R-5.9a-001] |
+| [R-9.3.3-007] | The FRMCS System shall be | A | TS 22.280 | Covered in on-network with |
+
+| | | | | |
+|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| | able to notify a specific group of FRMCS User(s) registered to functional identity(ies) with similarities in the structure of the successfully registered functional identity. | | | affiliation mechanism + automatic information when affiliation information changes in a group ([R-6.4.5-003a]). |
+|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+
+### 9.3.4 Use case: Deregistration of a functional identity
+
+#### 9.3.4.1 Description
+
+A FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment shall be able to deregister from one or multiple functional identities.
+
+#### 9.3.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment has at least one functional identity.
+
+#### 9.3.4.3 Service flows
+
+##### **Deregistration functional identity initiated by the FRMCS User**
+
+The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment chooses the functional identities to be deregistered among the list of currently registered functional identities by:
+
+- electing a set of functional identities (the application may select the appropriate set of functional identities automatically)
+- selecting one functional identity
+
+The FRMCS System informs the FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment about the outcome of the registration request.
+
+##### **Deregistration by the Railway Subsystem**
+
+Based on certain criteria the FRMCS System deregisters a FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment from one or multiple functional identities and informs the FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment about the deregistration.
+
+For example, possible criteria are timer, location, operational schedules, another FRMCS User taking over the functional identity.
+
+#### 9.3.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+If the FRMCS System has deregistered the functional identity, the previously registered FRMCS User (s) or FRMCS-equipment are not any longer reachable on this particular functional identity.
+
+If the FRMCS System has deregistered the functional identity and based on system configuration, the FRMCS System shall be able to notify a specific group of FRMCS User(s) registered to functional identity(ies) with similarities in the structure of the successfully deregistered functional identity.
+
+If the FRMCS System was unable to deregister the functional identity, the actually registered FRMCS User or FRMCS-equipment remains active and can be reached on this functional identity.
+
+In addition, the FRMCS User is reachable using the FRMCS Equipment Identity, its user identity (if logged in) and its subscriber identity.
+
+### 9.3.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.3.4-001] | The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment shall be able to deregister from a functional identity. | A | TS 22.280 | 5.9a2 |
+| [R-9.3.4-002] | During the deregistration process, the FRMCS System shall provide a list of functional identities to the FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment, to select for deregistration. | A | TS 22.280 | [R-5.9a-004] |
+| [R-9.3.4-003] | The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment shall also be able to perform a deregistration of a functional identity that might not be part of the list provided by the FRMCS System. Then a manual input is required by the FRMCS User. | A | TS 22.280 | [R-5.9a-010] |
+| [R-9.3.4-004] | The FRMCS System shall inform the FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment about the outcome of a deregistration request. | A | TS 22.280 | [R-5.9a-025] |
+| [R-9.3.4-005] | At any time, the Railway Subsystem of the FRMCS System shall be able to deregister any functional identity.
An automatic deregistration request can be based on:
- • user identification
- • operational conditions, like schedules when entering the train (for example by using Near Field Communication, Smart Card etc.)
- • location
- • time
- • recent activity
- • Smart cards or RFID tokens in the vicinity of the UE
- • FRMCS Equipment Type
- • etc.
| A | TS 22.280 | [R-5.9a-015]
[R-5.9a-018] |
+| [R-9.3.4-006] | The FRMCS System shall be able to notify a specific group of FRMCS User(s) registered to functional identity(ies) with similarities in the structure of the successfully deregistered functional identity. | A | TS 22.280 | Covered in on-network with affiliation mechanism + automatic information when affiliation information changes in a group ([R-6.4.5-003a]). |
+
+## 9.3.5 Use case: User log-in to the FRMCS System
+
+### 9.3.5.1 Description
+
+The user is identified by the FRMCS System.
+
+### 9.3.5.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The equipment type is initialized.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment provides suitable means to the user to log in.
+
+### 9.3.5.3 Service flows
+
+The user performs the log-in procedure.
+
+#### Successful identification
+
+The user is informed about the successful log-in into the FRMCS System. The user has now become a FRMCS User identified by a FRMCS User identity.
+
+#### Unsuccessful identification
+
+The user is informed about the unsuccessful log-in to the FRMCS System. The user is redirected to the log-in procedure.
+
+### 9.3.5.4 Post-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User is identified in the FRMCS System and can register a functional identity.
+
+The FRMCS User is reachable by the FRMCS User identity.
+
+### 9.3.5.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.3.5-001] | The FRMCS System shall allow a user to log into the FRMCS System using its FRMCS User Identity to make use of the services provided by the FRMCS System | A | TS 22.280
TS 22.179 | 3GPP building blocks = user authentication, service authorization and group affiliation.
Sign-in/sign-off and 3GPP building blocks:
22.280 [R-5.1.1-001]
22.179 section 4.5. |
+| [R-9.3.5-002] | The FRMCS System shall provide service only to FRMCS Users logged in into the FRMCS System. | A | TS 22.280
TS 22.179 | 3GPP building blocks = user authentication, service authorization and group affiliation.
Sign-in/sign-off and 3GPP building blocks:
22.280 [R-5.1.1-001]
22.179 section 4.5 |
+
+## 9.3.6 Use case: User log-out from FRMCS System
+
+### 9.3.6.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS User is logged out of the FRMCS System.
+
+### 9.3.6.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User is logged-in the FRMCS System.
+
+### 9.3.6.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS User performs the log-out procedure.
+
+#### **Successful log-out**
+
+The FRMCS System deregisters all functional identities of the FRMCS User.
+
+The FRMCS System logs out the FRMCS User.
+
+The FRMCS User is informed about the successful log-out from the FRMCS System.
+
+#### **Unsuccessful log-out**
+
+The FRMCS User is informed about the unsuccessful log-out to the FRMCS System.
+
+### 9.3.6.4 Post-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User is logged out of the FRMCS System. The FRMCS Equipment is still registered to the FRMCS System.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment is reachable by the subscriber identity.
+
+### 9.3.6.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.3.6-001] | The FRMCS System shall provide a notification to the FRMCS User when the FRMCS User is logged-out of the FRMCS System | A | Partly covered by TS 22.280 & 22.179. Remaining functionality are outside scope of 3GPP. | No specific login/logout procedure in TS 22.280. so no notification.
3GPP building blocks = user authentication, service authorization and group affiliation.
Sign-in/sign-off and 3GPP building blocks:
22.280 [R-5.1.1-001]
22.179 section 4.5. |
+| [R-9.3.6-002] | The FRMCS System shall provide the FRMCS User the necessary means to log out of the FRMCS System. | A | Partly covered by TS 22.280 & 22.179. Remaining functionality are outside scope of 3GPP. | No specific login/logout procedure in TS 22.280.
3GPP building blocks = user authentication, service authorization and group affiliation.
Sign-in/sign-off and 3GPP building blocks:
22.280 [R-5.1.1-001]
22.179 section 4.5. |
+| [R-9.3.6-003] | By logging out all functional identities of a FRMCS User are deregistered from the FRMCS User. | A | Partly covered by TS 22.280 & 22.179. Remaining functionality are outside scope of 3GPP. | Partly covered by [R-5.9a-018] but login/logout from the MCX Service system not defined.
3GPP building blocks = user authentication, service authorization and group affiliation.
Sign-in/sign-off and 3GPP building blocks:
22.280 [R-5.1.1-001]
22.179 section 4.5. |
+| [R-9.3.6-004] | After logging out the FRMCS User, the FRMCS Equipment shall be reachable via the subscriber identity. | A | Covered | This requirement can be supported by existing MCCore requirements in TS:
22.280,
22.278,
22.261. |
+
+### 9.3.7 Use case: Presentation of identities
+
+#### 9.3.7.1 Description
+
+A FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment shall be able to be identified by the functional identity (ies) to other FRMCS Users
+
+#### 9.3.7.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment is registered to at least one functional identity.
+
+#### 9.3.7.3 Service flows
+
+##### During call initiation
+
+The identities of the initiating entity (functional identity of a user, functional identity of equipment, user identity and subscriber identity) are to be passed and presented to the other FRMCS Users during communication.
+
+The FRMCS System passes the appropriate functional identity(ies) based on a certain context (like location, destination, time, local configuration, selection from the initiating entity, etc.).
+
+If multiple functional identities are used by the FRMCS User, the presentation is based on certain context (e.g. a call to a train Controller shows the running number, a call to a maintenance Controller shows the engine number).
+
+If the functional identity is not available, the FRMCS User identity is to be presented.
+
+If the functional identity and the FRMCS User identity are not available, the subscriber identity is to be presented.
+
+#### **During a call**
+
+The identities of the connected FRMCS User (s) (functional identity of a user, functional identity of equipment, user identity and subscriber identity) are forwarded to the FRMCS Users participating to the call.
+
+The FRMCS System passes the appropriate functional identity(ies) based on a certain context (like location, destination, time, local configuration, etc.).
+
+If multiple functional identities are used by the FRMCS User, the presentation is based on certain context (e.g. a call to a train Controller shows the running number, a call to a maintenance Controller shows the engine number).
+
+If the functional identity is not available, the FRMCS User identity is to be presented.
+
+If the functional identity and the FRMCS User identity are not available, the subscriber identity is to be presented.
+
+The functional identity(ies) of the talking FRMCS User is/are to be indicated to the listening FRMCS User (s).
+
+If the functional identity is not available, the FRMCS User identity is to be presented.
+
+If the functional identity and the FRMCS User identity are not available, the subscriber identity is to be presented.
+
+#### **9.3.7.4 Post-conditions**
+
+The FRMCS Users are informed about the FRMCS User initiating the communication initiator.
+
+The FRMCS User is informed about who are the participants of the call.
+
+The FRMCS User has at least one functional identity.
+
+### 9.3.7.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.3.7-001] | During communication initiation, the identities of the initiating entity (functional identity of a user, functional identity of equipment, user identity and subscriber identity) shall be passed to the FRMCS User (s) of the receiver(s) of the call. | A | TS 22.280 | This requirement is partly covered by MCCore, new and additional types of identities need to be supported.]
[R-6.4.3-001]: only identification of the transmitting participant is sent to all other affiliated members.
TS 22.280
[R-5.9a-002]
[R-5.9a-020]
[R-5.9a-022]
[R-5.9a-023] |
+| [R-9.3.7-002] | During a communication, the identities of the connected FRMCS User (s) (functional identity of a user, functional identity of equipment, user identity and subscriber identity) shall be sent to the FRMCS User (s) participants of the call. | A | TS 22.280 | This requirement is partly covered by MCCore, new and additional types of identities need to be supported.
TS 22.280
[R-5.9a-002]
[R-5.9a-020]
[R-5.9a-022]
[R-5.9a-023]
[R-6.9-004] |
+| [R-9.3.7-003] | The FRMCS User (s) shall be presented with the appropriate functional identity(ies) based on a certain context (like location, destination, time, local configuration, etc.). | A | TS 22.280 | Partly covered: functional identity based on context are provide to the FRMCS User on demand for activation. Only activated functional alias(ses) are presented.
TS 22.280
[R-5.9a-002]
[R-5.9a-020]
[R-5.9a-022]
[R-5.9a-023] |
+| [R-9.3.7-004] | If a functional identity is not available, the FRMCS System shall present the FRMCS User identity. | A | TS 22.280 | Partly covered: [R-6.4.3-001]
Only the MCX Service User ID of the transmitting participant is sent to all other affiliated members. |
+| [R-9.3.7-005] | If both the functional identity and the FRMCS User identity are not available, the FRMCS System shall present the subscriber identity. | A | TS 22.280
TS 22.278
TS 22.261 | This requirement can be supported by existing MCCore requirements. |
+
+### 9.3.8 Use case: Interrogation of identities within a certain context
+
+#### 9.3.8.1 Description
+
+A FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment is able to recognize which other functional identities are present within a certain context (for example train, region, communication group, Railway Emergency Communication, all Drivers on a station, etc.).
+
+### 9.3.8.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS-equipment is initialised.
+
+### 9.3.8.3 Service flows
+
+#### **Interrogation of functional identities**
+
+The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment can interrogate the FRMCS System to recognize the own functional identity(ies) or the functional identity of other FRMCS Users or FRMCS-equipment based on a FRMCS User identity or a subscriber identity.
+
+The FRMCS System returns the functional identity(ies) of the particular FRMCS User or FRMCS-equipment.
+
+#### **Interrogation of FRMCS User identities**
+
+The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment can interrogate the FRMCS System to recognize the own or other FRMCS User identity of FRMCS User (s) based on a functional identity or a subscriber identity.
+
+The FRMCS System returns the FRMCS User identity of the particular FRMCS User (s).
+
+#### **Interrogation of a subscriber identity**
+
+The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment can interrogate the FRMCS System to recognize the own or other FRMCS Equipment Identity based on a functional identity or a FRMCS User identity.
+
+The FRMCS System returns the particular subscriber identity.
+
+#### **Interrogation of functional identity(ies) in a certain context**
+
+The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment can interrogate the FRMCS System to recognize the functional identities of own or other FRMCS Users within a certain context.
+
+The FRMCS System returns to the FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment a set of functional identities (own or other) within the certain context.
+
+### 9.3.8.4 Post-conditions
+
+The requesting FRMCS User or FRMCS-equipment is informed about the own or other FRMCS Users / FRMCS-equipment with a functional identity within a certain context, for example train, region, communication group, Railway Emergency Communication, all Drivers on a station, etc.
+
+### 9.3.8.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.3.8-001] | The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment shall be able to interrogate the FRMCS System to provide the functional identity(ies) registered to a certain FRMCS User identity.
The FRMCS System shall return the functional identity(ies) of the FRMCS User. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280
R-5.9a-011
R-5.9a-012 |
+| [R-9.3.8-002] | The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment shall be able to interrogate the FRMCS System to provide the functional identity(ies) based on a subscriber identity.
The FRMCS System shall return the functional identity(ies) of a subscriber identity. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280
R-5.9a-011
R-5.9a-012 |
+| [R-9.3.8-003] | The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment, shall be able to interrogate the FRMCS System to provide the FRMCS User identity registered to a functional identity.
The FRMCS System shall return the FRMCS User identity/identities. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280
R-5.9a-011
R-5.9a-012 |
+| [R-9.3.8-004] | The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment, shall be able to interrogate the FRMCS System to provide the FRMCS User identity based on a subscriber identity.
The FRMCS System shall return the FRMCS User identity/identities. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280
R-5.9a-011
R-5.9a-012 |
+| [R-9.3.8-005] | The FRMCS User or the FRMCS-equipment, shall be able to interrogate the FRMCS System to provide the subscriber identity based on a functional identity
The FRMCS System shall return the subscriber identity(ies). | A | TS 22.280 | [R-5.9a-011] |
+
+## 9.3.9 Use case: Service interworking with GSM-R
+
+### 9.3.9.1 Description
+
+Service interworking with legacy communication systems is of importance for the time period both systems have to coexist. In this section service interworking between the GSM-R System and the FRMCS System for functional identities and its associated roles will be addressed.
+
+#### Functional Address
+
+On top of the E.164 numbering plan alternative addressing scheme called functional addressing is used in the context with GSM-R. Functional addressing scheme allows the establishment of communication without knowing each E.164 number associated with a particular train. A functional address consists of:
+
+IC+CT+UN
+
+- IC International code is used to route calls to the appropriate GSM-R network
+- CT Call Type prefix defines how to interpret the User Number (UN) as train function number, engine function number, group calls etc.
+- UN User Number is of variable length and depends on the information i.e. train function number etc. Within the UN a Functional Code (FC) is associated and provides the information of the person or equipment on a particular train, or a particular team within a given area. Therefore, the UN consists of User Identification Number (UIN) i.e. train number etc. and the Functional Code (FC) resulting into: UN= UIN+FC
+
+A functional address only consists of numeric characters.
+
+### 9.3.9.2 Pre-conditions
+
+Following user addressing scenarios applies between FRMCS System and GSM-R system when using alternative addressing schemes in FRMCS:
+
+A GSM-R user is able to obtain communication services from the GSM-R system. E.164 numbering plan and functional addressing scheme applies.
+
+A FRMCS User is able to obtain communication services from the FRMCS System or from the GSM-R system. If the FRMCS User, in this sense the FRMCS Equipment is registered to the FRMCS System, user addressing of the FRMCS system applies comprising the use of functional identity addressing scheme. If the FRMCS Equipment is registered to the GSM-R system, E.164 numbering plan and functional addressing i.e. IC+CT+UIN+FC scheme applies.
+
+For a train route which encompasses both GSM-R and FRMCS coverage areas the functional identity registration for users and equipment travelling this route shall be made in two parallel entries in the respective GSM-R functional addressing and FRMCS Functional Aliasing databases.
+
+Any subsequent modification of functional addressing or functional aliasing while the user or equipment is registered shall be done in parallel on both systems
+
+The deregistration of the functional aliasing or functional addressing for the user or equipment with parallel registration shall be deregistered in parallel.
+
+### 9.3.9.3 Service flows
+
+#### FRMCS User relocates from GSM-R system to the FRMCS System
+
+When the FRMCS Equipment relocates from GSM-R system to the FRMCS System, the applicable functional address(es) associated with the FRMCS User require(s) a conversion to the functional identity format applicable within
+
+the FRMCS System. The functional address remains active until the corresponding functional identity becomes deactivated.
+
+#### **FRMCS User relocates from FRMCS System to the GSM-R system**
+
+When the FRMCS Equipment relocates from FRMCS System to the GSM-R system, the applicable functional identity or identities associated with FRMCS user require(s) a conversion to the functional address format applicable within the GSM-R system. The functional identity or identities remains active until the corresponding functional address becomes deactivated.
+
+#### **Bilateral communication addressing between FRMCS System and GSM-R**
+
+A FRMCS User establishes a communication using the functional identity of another FRMCS User whose FRMCS Equipment is registered to GSM-R.
+
+A FRMCS User establishes a communication using the functional address of a GSM-R user whose GSM-R equipment is registered to GSM-R.
+
+A GSM-R user establishes a communication using the functional identity of a FRMCS User.
+
+#### **9.3.9.4 Post-conditions**
+
+After successful relocation following is applicable:
+
+- From GSM-R point of view, the FRMCS User is reachable for communication by its functional address.
+- From FRMCS System point of view, the FRMCS User is reachable for communication by its functional identity.
+
+### 9.3.9.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.3.9-001] | The FRMCS System shall support the conversion between functional identity encompassing the associated role and functional addressing as part of the GSM-R system. | A | 22.179
22.280 | 22.179 [R-6.18.4.2-002], [R-6.18.4.2-002a], [R-6.18.4.2-002b] and 22.280 [R-6.17.3.1-003], [R-6.17.3.1-004], [R-6.17.3.1-005] |
+| [R-9.3.9-002] | The FRMCS System shall support functional addressing format consisting of:
IC+CT+UN
IC International code is used to route calls to the appropriate GSM-R network
CT Call Type prefix defines how to interpret the User Number (UN) as train function number, engine function number, group calls etc.
UN User Number is of variable length and depends on the information i.e. train function number etc. Within the UN a Functional Code (FC) is associated and provides the information of the person or equipment on a particular train, or a particular team within a given area. Therefore, the UN consists of User Identification Number (UIN) i.e. train number etc. and the Functional Code (FC) resulting into: UN= UIN+FC
A functional address only consists of numeric characters.
| A | 22.280 | [ [R-5.9a-014] |
+| [R-9.3.9-003] | A FRMCS User shall be | A | 22.179
22.280 | 22.179 [R-6.18.4.2-002], [R-6.18.4.2-002a], [R-6.18.4.2- |
+
+| | | | | |
+|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| | reachable by its FRMCS Functional Identity if the FRMCS Equipment is registered to the GSM-R system | | | 002b] and 22.280 [R-6.17.3.1-003], [R-6.17.3.1-004], [R-6.17.3.1-005] |
+| [R-9.3.9-004] | A GSM-R User shall be reachable if a FRMCS User is registered to the FRMSC System using the functional address of the particular GSM-R user. | A | 22.179
22.280 | 22.179 [R-6.18.4.2-002], [R-6.18.4.2-002a], [R-6.18.4.2-002b] and 22.280 [R-6.17.3.1-003], [R-6.17.3.1-004], [R-6.17.3.1-005] |
+| [R-9.3.9-005] | A FRMCS User shall be reachable if a GSM-R user uses the functional identity of the particular FRMCS User. | A | 22.179
22.280 | [ 22.179 [R-6.18.4.2-002], [R-6.18.4.2-002a], [R-6.18.4.2-002b] and 22.280 [R-6.17.3.1-003], [R-6.17.3.1-004], [R-6.17.3.1-005] |
+
+## 9.4 Location services related use cases
+
+### 9.4.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to location services are defined. The following use cases are defined:
+
+- Provide location information
+- Request for location information
+- Request for identities based on location
+
+The location information of an FRMCS Equipment consists of the following elements:
+
+- Geographic Location,
+- Velocity (the combination of speed and direction),
+- Infra Location (additional information specifying railway infra elements; for example: signal 123, switch 456, track section 789A, etcetera), and
+- Quality of Service information (horizontal and vertical accuracy, response time, QoS class, accuracy of Infra Location).
+
+### 9.4.2 Use Case: Provide location information
+
+#### 9.4.2.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS Equipment provides its location information to the FRMCS System for further processing e.g. for automatic train operation. External systems can be supported in providing additional location information with or without functional identity reference to the FRMCS System for further processing.
+
+The location information may be shared directly with other applications on the same FRMCS Equipment without the involvement of the FRMCS System.
+
+#### 9.4.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS Equipment supports some mechanisms to obtain its location.
+
+### 9.4.2.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS Equipment determines its current location in a periodic or an event-triggered manner. The frequency of the location reporting may change according to the application requirements.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment reports location information that may include its applicable FRMCS Equipment Identity. At any time, upon request, the FRMCS Equipment shall be able to report its location information.
+
+External systems can provide additional information to the FRMCS System in order to improve location accuracy of an FRMCS Equipment.
+
+The received location information is stored by FRMCS System.
+
+In case of periodic location reporting, the FRMCS System supervises the continuous supply of the location information. If the supply of periodic location information by the FRMCS Equipment stops, the FRMCS System initiates the re-establishment of the periodic location information data flow. The FRMCS System can correlate other identities from the FRMCS Equipment Identity.
+
+### 9.4.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The location information of the FRMCS Equipment is available in the FRMCS System.
+
+### 9.4.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.4.2-001] | The FRMCS Equipment shall be able to provide its location to the FRMCS System. | A | 22.280 | This requirement can be supported by existing 3GPP requirements |
+| [R-9.4.2-001a] | The location information of an FRMCS Equipment shall consist of: - • The geographic location,
- • The velocity,
- • The infra location, and
- • The Quality of service information.
| A | 22.071 | Partly covered by TS 22.071. Location Information of a UE consists of Geographic Location, Velocity, Civic Location and Quality of Service information. Civic location (also called Dispatchable Location) is only applicable to emergency services based on regional regulatory requirements (wireless 911 calls). |
+| [R-9.4.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall be able to request the FRMCS Equipment to provide its location. | A | 22.280 | This requirement can be supported by existing 3GPP requirements |
+| [R-9.4.2-003] | The FRMCS System shall be able to request the FRMCS Equipment to provide its location periodically. | A | 22.280 | This requirement can be supported by existing 3GPP requirements |
+| [R-9.4.2-004] | The FRMCS System shall be able to request the FRMCS Equipment to stop providing its location periodically. | A | 22.280 | This requirement can be supported by existing 3GPP requirements |
+| [R-9.4.2-005] | The FRMCS System shall be able to handle additional location information from other external sources. | A | 22.280 | |
+
+## 9.4.3 Use Case: Request for location information
+
+### 9.4.3.1 Description
+
+A FRMCS User, an application or an External System can request the location information of a functional identity, FRMCS User identity or FRMCS Equipment Identity from the FRMCS System.
+
+### 9.4.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User, an application or an External System, is entitled to request location information from the FRMCS System.
+
+### 9.4.3.3 Service flows
+
+A FRMCS User, an application or an External System requests location information to the FRMCS System based on a functional identity, FRMCS User identity or FRMCS Equipment Identity.
+
+The location requesting entity can request for a single location information or a periodical update of the location information.
+
+The location requesting entity can send a request to the FRMCS System to stop the periodical update of location information.
+
+#### ***Positive outcome***
+
+The FRMCS System provides the location information as requested, either once or periodically.
+
+#### ***Negative outcome***
+
+The location information is not available, or the identity is not known in the FRMCS System.
+
+The FRMCS System sends a response back to the requesting FRMCS User, application or External System if the location information is not available.
+
+### 9.4.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The location information is provided, if available.
+
+### 9.4.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.4.3-001] | Upon request from FRMCS Users, applications or External Systems the FRMCS System shall be able to provide the location information of a functional identity, FRMCS User identity or FRMCS Equipment Identity. | A | Partly covered by TS 22.280. Remaining functionality are outside scope of 3GPP. | This requirement is partly covered by TS 22.280 [R-5.9a-027] and TS 22.280 [R-6.12-006]. |
+| [R-9.4.3-002] | Upon request from FRMCS Users, applications or External Systems the FRMCS System shall be able to periodically provide the location information of a functional identity, FRMCS User identity or FRMCS Equipment Identity. | A | Partly covered by TS 22.280. Remaining functionality are outside scope of 3GPP. | This requirement is partly covered by TS 22.280 [R-6.12-006]. |
+| [R-9.4.3-003] | The FRMCS System shall only allow the FRMCS User, the application or the External System initially requesting periodic location reporting to stop the periodic location reporting. | A | Partly covered by TS 22.280. Remaining functionality are outside scope of 3GPP. | This requirement is partly covered by TS 22.280 [R-5.11-005] and TS 22.280 [R-6.12-007]. |
+
+## 9.4.4 Use Case: Request for identities in a certain area
+
+### 9.4.4.1 Description
+
+A FRMCS User, an application or an External System can request identities based on location information from the FRMCS System.
+
+### 9.4.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User, an application or an External System, is entitled to request location information from the FRMCS System.
+
+### 9.4.4.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS User, an application or an External System requests the FRMCS System to provide a list of functional identities, FRMCS User identities or FRMCS Equipment Identities at a certain point, area, station, track section, etc.
+
+The FRMCS User, an application or an External System can request the list of identities to be given once or periodically by the FRMCS System.
+
+Only the FRMCS User, the application or the External System initially requesting periodic reporting can stop the periodic reporting by the FRMCS System.
+
+### 9.4.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+The FRMCS System provides the list of identities as requested.
+
+#### 9.4.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.4.4-001] | The FRMCS System shall allow a FRMCS User, an application or an External System to request a list of functional identities, FRMCS User identities or FRMCS Equipment Identities in a certain area either periodically or as a onetime request. | A | Covered by TS 22.280.
Serving an external system is outside the scope of 3GPP. | This requirement is covered by existing 3GPP Location Services and MCCore requirements.
[R-5.9a-031] |
+| [R-9.4.4-002] | The FRMCS System shall be able to provide the list of identities and their location to the requesting FRMCS User, application or External System either periodically or as a onetime report. | A | Covered by TS 22.280.
Serving an external system is outside the scope of 3GPP. | This requirement is covered by existing 3GPP Location Services and MCCore requirements.
[R-5.9a-031] |
+| [R-9.4.4-003] | The FRMCS System shall allow only the requesting FRMCS User, application or External System to stop the periodic reporting. | A | Covered by TS 22.280.
Serving an external system is outside the scope of 3GPP. | This requirement is covered by existing 3GPP Location Services and MCCore requirements.
[R-5.9a-031] |
+
+### 9.5 FRMCS User communication handling related use cases
+
+#### 9.5.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to the function of inviting a FRMCS User to a communication are defined.
+
+- Invite-a-FRMCS User to a FRMCS communication
+- FRMCS User receiving an invitation to a FRMCS communication
+- FRMCS User accepting an invitation to a FRMCS communication
+- FRMCS User rejecting an invitation to a FRMCS communication
+- FRMCS User ignoring an invitation to a FRMCS communication
+- Service interworking with GSM-R
+
+#### 9.5.2 Use Case: Inviting-FRMCS User(s) to a voice communication
+
+##### 9.5.2.1 Description
+
+An authorized FRMCS User can invite other(s) FRMCS User(s) to join an ongoing voice communication.
+
+### 9.5.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The inviting FRMCS User is part of an already established FRMCS voice communication of two or more FRMCS Users.
+
+### 9.5.2.3 Service flows
+
+#### Inviting user
+
+From a list of FRMCS Users provided by the FRMCS System or by entering an unlisted identity, the inviting FRMCS User selects another FRMCS User, or a pre-defined group of users, to be invited.
+
+### 9.5.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User (s) have been invited.
+
+The inviting FRMCS User remains connected to the FRMCS voice communication involving two or more FRMCS Users.
+
+### 9.5.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.5.2-001] | If authorized to, a FRMCS User shall be able to invite other(s) FRMCS User(s) to join an ongoing voice communication. | A | 22.280 | Partially covered by 6.4.6.2 Negotiated change" provides the basic functionality (limited to ongoing group communications). |
+| [R-9.5.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall provide a list of identities for the inviting FRMCS User to select from. | A | N/A | Implementation option: 22.280 6.4.6.2 Negotiated change does not make any assumption on the way and means an authorised user gets the identities to be included - i.e. this happens on application layer |
+| [R-9.5.2-003] | The invitation request shall either be based on the functional identity, FRMCS User Identity, FRMCS Equipment Identity. | A | N/A | Implementation option: Keep it on application layer as otherwise, considering the sheer number of users, we would have to give an indication on how to filter that list. |
+
+## 9.5.3 Use Case: FRMCS User receiving an invitation to a voice communication
+
+### 9.5.3.1 Description
+
+A FRMCS User will receive the invitation originated by the inviting FRMCS User.
+
+### 9.5.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User may or may not be involved in voice communication.
+
+### 9.5.3.3 Service flows
+
+The invitation is indicated to the FRMCS User by audible and visual notification.
+
+### 9.5.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User has received the invitation.
+
+Voice communication of the invited FRMCS User continues unaffected.
+
+### 9.5.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.5.3-001] | If entitled to, a FRMCS User shall be able to receive invitations to voice communication(s), independent of being involved in communication. | A | 22.280 | Implicitly provided by the normal function of MCX Communication |
+
+## 9.5.4 Use case: FRMCS User accepting an invitation to a voice communication
+
+### 9.5.4.1 Description
+
+A FRMCS User can accept the invitation sent by the inviting FRMCS User.
+
+### 9.5.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User has received an invitation to a voice communication which is not yet expired.
+
+### 9.5.4.3 Service flows
+
+#### **Invited FRMCS User not involved in a voice communication**
+
+The FRMCS User accepts the invitation of the voice communication.
+
+The FRMCS User joins the ongoing voice communication. If the ongoing voice communication involves two users (user-to-user), the ongoing voice communication is translated into a multi-users voice communication.
+
+Other FRMCS Users involved in the voice communication receive a notification that the FRMCS User has joined the communication by which the joining FRMCS User is identified to the other FRMCS Users.
+
+#### **Invited FRMCS User is involved in a voice communication**
+
+The FRMCS User accepts the invitation of the voice communication.
+
+The FRMCS System prompts the invited FRMCS User about the treatment of the existing voice communication.
+
+The FRMCS User may have the choice between some or all of these options:
+
+- **Terminate:** The FRMCS User terminates the current voice communication.
+- **Leave** the existing voice communication. If the communication consisted only of two participants, a participant leaving the communication will cause the communication to be terminated.
+
+- **Merge:** The FRMCS System merges the two voice communications into one single voice communication.
+
+The FRMCS User joins the ongoing voice communication. If the ongoing voice communication involves two users (user-to-user), the ongoing voice communication is translated into a multi-users voice communication.
+
+Other FRMCS Users involved in the voice communication(s) are notified that the invited user has joined the communication or the communication has been merged.
+
+#### 9.5.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+The invited FRMCS User is participating in the voice communication he was invited to.
+
+The invited FRMCS User is indicated as connected to the voice communication to all FRMCS Users in the communication.
+
+The presence status of the invited user is updated with the appropriate attributes.
+
+#### 9.5.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.5.4-001] | The FRMCS User shall be able to accept an invitation to join a voice communication. | A | 22.280 | R-6.4.6.2-005 |
+| [R-9.5.4-002] | When accepting a communication invitation, in case the FRMCS User has a voice communication, the FRMCS User shall be able to leave, terminate or merge the voice communication. If the FRMCS User decides to merge the communications both voice communications shall be merged. | A | 22.280 | 5.4.1, 5.4.2, 5.1.5
R-6.4.4-003, R-6.4.4-004
The affiliation mechanism is sufficient to mimic the desired behavior of leave and terminate
Merging can be done by 22.280 6.6.1 Group regrouping" |
+| [R-9.5.4-003] | When accepting a communication invitation (i.e. the FRMCS User joins the ongoing voice communication), If the ongoing voice communication involves two users (user-to-user), the ongoing voice communication is translated into a multi-users voice communication. | A | Not covered | TS 22.280 6.4.6.2 Negotiated change is limited to group communications. |
+| [R-9.5.4-004] | When accepting a communication invitation, other FRMCS Users involved in the voice communication(s) are notified that the invited user has joined the communication, or the communication has been merged. | A | 22.280 | Covered by the affiliation mechanism. |
+
+## 9.5.5 Use case: FRMCS User rejecting an invitation to a voice communication
+
+### 9.5.5.1 Description
+
+A FRMCS User can reject the invitation sent by the inviting FRMCS User.
+
+### 9.5.5.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User has received an invitation to a voice communication which is not expired yet.
+
+### 9.5.5.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS User rejects the invitation.
+
+The inviting FRMCS User receives a notification that the invitation was rejected by the invited FRMCS User.
+
+### 9.5.5.4 Post-conditions
+
+The invited FRMCS User is not participating in the voice communication related to the received invitation.
+
+### 9.5.5.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------|
+| [R-9.5.5-001] | The FRMCS User shall be able to reject the invitation to join a voice communication. | A | 22.280 | R-6.4.6.2-005 |
+| [R-9.5.5-002] | The inviting FRMCS User sending the invitation shall be informed.
The inviting FRMCS User shall be notified. | A | 22.280 | R-6.4.6.2-005 |
+
+## 9.5.6 Use case: FRMCS User ignoring an invitation to a voice communication
+
+### 9.5.6.1 Description
+
+A FRMCS User can ignore the invitation sent by the inviting FRMCS User.
+
+### 9.5.6.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User has received an invitation which is not yet expired.
+
+### 9.5.6.3 Service flows
+
+The invited FRMCS User does not respond to the received invitation within a certain period of time
+
+The inviting FRMCS User receives a notification that the invitation was rejected as it was not accepted within a certain period of time.
+
+### 9.5.6.4 Post-conditions
+
+The invited FRMCS User does not participate in the voice communication.
+
+### 9.5.6.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.5.6-002] | If the receiving FRMCS User has not reacted on the invitation within a certain period of time [t1] the FRMCS System shall notify the inviting FRMCS User accordingly and stop the invitation request. | A | N/A | This is left to the app layer design to decide what happens if a MCX User does not react in due time. |
+
+## 9.5.7 Service interworking with GSM-R
+
+### 9.5.7.1 Description
+
+For migration purposes, the service interworking between the GSM-R system and FRMCS system for inviting a user needs to be defined.
+
+The following interworking use cases are needed for alerting a controller functionality: the case that there is a group call in GSM-R and a user would like to invite a controller who is in FRMCS:
+
+Inviting-a-FRMCS User to a GSM-R voice group communication:
+operational scenarios to support service interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS. On the left, the GSM-R coverage area shows an ongoing group call between three mobile phones and a user labeled 'CT7'. A dispatcher icon is also present. Step (1) shows the dispatcher inviting the CT7 user. Step (2) shows the interconnection between the GSM-R and FRMCS networks via ISDN or SIP-R to invite the dispatcher. The FRMCS coverage area on the right shows three mobile phones and a computer monitor connected to a base station.
+
+Diagram illustrating the service interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS for inviting a user. The diagram is split into two halves: GSM-R coverage (left, blue background) and FRMCS coverage (right, orange background). In the GSM-R coverage area, an 'Ongoing Group Call' is shown involving three mobile phones and a user labeled 'CT7'. A dispatcher icon is also present. Step (1) shows the dispatcher inviting the CT7 user. Step (2) shows the interconnection between the GSM-R and FRMCS networks via ISDN or SIP-R to invite the dispatcher. The FRMCS coverage area shows three mobile phones and a computer monitor connected to a base station.
+
+Note: Group calls may be used by shunting or trackside workers when their dispatcher has already migrated to FRMCS
+
+Figure 9.5.7.1-1. Inviting-a-user from GSM-R to FRMCS
+
+The case that there is a group communication in FRMCS, and a user would like to invite a controller who is in GSM-R also applies:
+
+Inviting-a-GSM-R User to a FRMCS voice group communication:
+operational scenarios to support service interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating the operational scenario for inviting a GSM-R user to a FRMCS voice group communication. The diagram is split into two coverage areas: GSM-R coverage (left, blue background) and FRMCS coverage (right, orange background). In the FRMCS coverage area, an 'Ongoing Group Call' is shown with three mobile devices and a dispatcher (DS). A worker (represented by a yellow figure) initiates step (1), 'Invites his dispatcher'. The dispatcher then initiates step (2), 'Interconnection between GSM-R and FRMCS networks via ISDN or SIP-R to invite his dispatcher'. This interconnection is shown as a line passing through a base station in the FRMCS area, across the boundary, to a base station in the GSM-R area, and finally to a computer icon representing the dispatcher's terminal in the GSM-R area.
+
+Note: Group calls may be used by shunting or trackside workers when their dispatcher has not migrated to FRMCS yet
+
+Figure 9.5.7.1-2. Inviting-a-user from FRMCS to GSM-R
+
+The above use cases only apply if the controller system is connected to only one system. If the controller system is connected to both FRMCS and GSM-R systems, there is no need.
+
+This use case only applies to end user devices supporting both FRMCS and GSM-R systems.
+
+### 9.5.7.2 Pre-condition
+
+#### Group call in GSM-R and controller in FRMCS
+
+A voice group call has been established in GSM-R System.
+
+The controller in charge of the area is attached to FRMCS System only. This controller is not part of the voice group call.
+
+#### Group call in FRMCS and controller in GSM-R
+
+A voice group call has been established in FRMCS System.
+
+The controller in charge of the area is attached to GSM-R System only. This controller is not part of the voice group call.
+
+### 9.5.7.3 Service flow
+
+#### Group call in GSM-R and controller in FRMCS
+
+When there is an ongoing voice group call in GSM-R system and when a GSM-R User part of this group call is initiating an *alerting-a-controller* to invite a controller to join this group call, the request to join this group call shall be routed to the relevant Controller(s) attached to FRMCS System.
+
+#### Group call in FRMCS and controller in GSM-R
+
+When there is an ongoing voice group call in FRMCS system and when a FRMCS User part of this group call is initiating an *Inviting-FRMCS User(s) to a voice communication* to invite a controller to join this group call, the request to join this group call shall be routed to the relevant Controller(s) attached to GSM-R System.
+
+### 9.5.7.4 Post-condition
+
+#### Group call in GSM-R and controller in FRMCS
+
+The relevant Controller(s) attached to FRMCS System are invited to join the ongoing voice group call in GSM-R system.
+
+#### Group call in FRMCS and controller in GSM-R
+
+The relevant Controller(s) attached to GSM-R System are invited to join the ongoing voice group call in FRMCS system.
+
+### 9.5.7.5 Potential requirements
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
+| [9.5.7-001] | The FRMCS System shall provide service interworking between the alerting a controller functionality in the GSM-R system and in the FRMCS System. | A | 22.280 | Covered by [R-6.17.3.1-002] to [R-6.17.3.1-005]. |
+
+## 9.6 Void
+
+## 9.7 Multiuser talker control related use cases
+
+### 9.7.1 General Description and potential requirements
+
+#### 9.7.1.1 General Description
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to multiuser talker control for voice communication are defined. The following use cases are defined:
+
+- Set the number of simultaneous talkers
+- Set initial talker permissions and priorities
+- Request permission to talk
+- Grant permission to talk
+- Revoke permission to talk
+
+Note: For examples of Role management, like functional identities, FRMCS Equipment Identities, etc. in the railway environment, see annex A.
+
+#### 9.7.1.2 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------|
+| [R-9.7.1-001] | Multiuser talker control shall be available for both on-net and off-net communication. | A | 22.179 | Covered for On-net only |
+
+## 9.7.2 Use case: Set the number of simultaneous talkers
+
+### 9.7.2.1 Description
+
+For multiuser communication, i.e. when several users are involved in the same communication, the number of users that are granted the right to talk at the same time can be limited to either one, a limited number or unrestricted number.
+
+The communication application (e.g. shunting team communication) will set the number of simultaneous talkers and/or the identities of involved FRMCS Users and if required other application specific criteria.
+
+### 9.7.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+An active communication application capable to use the multiuser talker control.
+
+### 9.7.2.3 Service flows
+
+The communication application sends the number of simultaneous talker(s) information to the multiuser talker control.
+
+This information is used by multiuser talker control when setting up the communication.
+
+If there is a need to change the number of simultaneous talkers, it is the communication application which sends this information to the multiuser talker control.
+
+The multiuser talker control then uses this updated information for controlling the number of simultaneous talkers in the communication.
+
+### 9.7.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The multiuser talker control is aware about the number of simultaneous FRMCS Users and uses this information during communication.
+
+### 9.7.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------|
+| [R-9.7.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to limit the number of simultaneous talkers in a multiuser communication. | A | 22.179 | R-6.2.3.7.2-005 |
+| [R-9.7.2-002] | The maximum number of simultaneous talkers in a multiuser communication shall be provided by the communication application. The number of simultaneous talkers can be either one, a limited number or an unrestricted number and shall be changeable during the communication. | A | 22.179 | R-6.2.3.7.2-006 |
+
+## 9.7.3 Use case: Set initial talker permissions and priorities
+
+### 9.7.3.1 Description
+
+There are different requirements for talker permissions and to prioritise talkers in different communication applications.
+
+The FRMCS Users are identified by their functional identities.
+
+The communication application defines the talker permissions and priorities based on the functional identities and the type of communication application, e.g., railway emergency call, shunting, multi train.
+
+One or multiple FRMCS Users can be granted with the permission to perform as talker in a certain communication. These FRMCS Users are able to request permission to talk during communication.
+
+Certain FRMCS User(s) that have requested the permission to talk at the same time or while another user is talking can be granted with an initial talker permission i.e., they will be given the permission first before requests of others are served independent of whether they were the first requesting the permission to talk or not. This initial talker permission granted for certain FRMCS User(s) is limited in time by system configuration.
+
+Different FRMCS Users can be granted with a different talker priority. In case of parallel requests for permission to talk, the permission is granted to the FRMCS User(s) with highest talker priority. The requests with identical talker priorities will be queued based on the time of request.
+
+### 9.7.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+An active communication application capable to use the multiuser talker control.
+
+### 9.7.3.3 Service flows
+
+The communication application sends information about talker permissions and talker priorities to the multiuser talker control application.
+
+This information is used in multiuser talker control when setting up the communication.
+
+If there is a need to change the information about talker permissions and talker priorities, it is the communication application that sends this information to multiuser talker control.
+
+The multiuser control then uses this updated information for controlling the talker permissions and talker priorities in the communication.
+
+### 9.7.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The multiuser control is aware of the talker permissions and talker priorities and uses this information for communication control/setup.
+
+### 9.7.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.7.3-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to handle talker permissions and priorities as provided by the communication application, e.g., railway emergency call, shunting, multi train | A | 22.179 | R-6.2.3.7.4.1-002
R-6.2.3.7.4.1-004 |
+| [R-9.7.3-002] | The FRMCS System shall allow to grant several FRMCS Users with the permission to perform as talker in a certain communication. | A | 22.179 | R-6.2.3.7.4.1-002
R-6.2.3.7.4.1-003 |
+| [R-9.7.3-003] | FRMCS Users shall be able to request permission to talk during communication. | A | 22.179 | R-6.2.3.7.3-004 |
+| [R-9.7.3-004] | The FRMCS System shall be able to grant FRMCS Users an initial talker permission (i.e., be the first speaker in the communication) ensuring that the entitled FRMCS User(s) are able to talk first, once the communication is established. | A | 22.179 | R-6.2.3.7.4.1-003 |
+| [R-9.7.3-004a] | This initial talker permission granted for certain FRMCS User(s) is limited in time by system configuration. | A | 22.179 | Partly covered by floor priority, override mechanism and dynamic change of maximum number of simultaneous talkers (section 6.2.3.7). How to identify that certain user(s) can be granted (e.g., train driver initiating the call) is not in the scope of 3GPP. No timer in current specification to limit time for initial talker permission. |
+| [R-9.7.3-005] | The FRMCS System shall be able to grant the permission to talk based on a FRMCS User talker priority. In case of pending requests for permission to talk, the permission shall be granted to the FRMCS User with highest talker priority. Requests of identical talker priority shall be handled based on the time of request. | A | 22.179 | R-6.2.3.7.4.1-004
R-6.2.3.7.4.1-004 |
+
+### 9.7.4 Use case: Request permission to talk
+
+#### 9.7.4.1 Description
+
+There are occasions in the railway environment where it is needed to mitigate the risk of miscommunication. Use cases include, for example:
+
+- Emergency communication
+- Shunting communication
+- Trackside worker communication
+
+The system shall therefore be able to limit the number of simultaneous talkers in a voice communication.
+
+An entitled FRMCS User shall be able to select and de-select FRMCS User (s) being able to talk in a voice communication.
+
+The FRMCS User shall be able to request the permission to talk (raise the hand).
+
+#### 9.7.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User is involved in an active voice communication. The number of simultaneous talkers is limited in this communication.
+
+#### 9.7.4.3 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS User requests permission to talk on the MMI of the communication application (e.g. by pressing a Push-to-talk button)
+
+The communication application sends the request to the multiuser talker control in the FRMCS System.
+
+The communication application indicates on the MMI that talker permission has been requested.
+
+#### 9.7.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+Permission to talk has been requested and a response from the multiuser talker control in the FRMCS System expected.
+
+#### 9.7.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------|
+| [R-9.7.4-001] | An entitled FRMCS User shall be able to select and de-select FRMCS User (s) being able to talk in a voice communication. | A | 22.179 | [R-6.2.3.7.2-002] |
+| [R-9.7.4-002] | The FRMCS User shall be able to request permission to talk of the FRMCS UE (e.g. by pressing a Push-to-talk button). The FRMCS UE shall indicate the talker permission has been requested. | A | 22.179 | [R-6.2.3.7.3-001] |
+
+### 9.7.5 Use case: Grant permission to talk
+
+#### 9.7.5.1 Description
+
+There are occasions in the railway environment where it is needed to mitigate the risk of miscommunication. Use cases include, for example:
+
+- Emergency communication
+- Shunting communication
+
+- Trackside worker communication
+
+The system shall be able to limit the number of simultaneous talkers in a voice communication.
+
+The list of FRMCS Users with permission to talk and those who have requested it, shall be available to the Multiuser Talker Control application.
+
+### 9.7.5.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User is an active voice communication.
+
+Multiuser Talker Control is configured by the communication application to limit the number of simultaneous talkers.
+
+By default, the Multiuser Control uses a set of criteria, like priorities, identities, etc. to manage the requests automatically
+
+In addition, an entitled FRMCS User (i.e. based on functional identity) who is monitoring the progress of the communication can select and de-select simultaneous talkers.
+
+### 9.7.5.3 Service flows
+
+#### **Automatic management of requests**
+
+The Multiuser Talker Control in the FRMCS System receives a request to talk from a FRMCS User.
+
+The Multiuser Talker Control in the FRMCS System verifies the number of FRMCS Users who already have permission to talk.
+
+If the number of FRMCS Users with permission to talk does not exceed the maximum number of simultaneous talkers, the Multiuser Talker Control grants automatically the permission to the requester.
+
+If the number of FRMCS Users with permission to talk exceeds the maximum number of simultaneous talkers, the Multiuser Talker Control decides based on certain criteria, like priorities, functional identity, etc. who will keep the right to speak and who will be granted the permission to talk the Multiuser Talker Control configures the system accordingly.
+
+If the number of talker permissions are reduced and the reduction results in having more active talkers than permitted, the active talkers lose their permission to talk as soon as they stop talking (i.e. release PTT) until the new maximum allowed number of talkers is met.
+
+The Multiuser Talker Control service sends an indication to the FRMCS Users whose permission to talk has been changed due to that.
+
+#### **Management of requests by an entitled FRMCS User**
+
+The Multiuser Talker Control in the FRMCS System receives a request to talk from a FRMCS User.
+
+The Multiuser Talker Control service in the FRMCS System verifies the number of FRMCS Users who already have permission to talk.
+
+If the number of FRMCS Users with permission to talk does not exceed the maximum number of simultaneous talkers, the Multiuser Talker Control service grants automatically the permission to the requester.
+
+If the number of FRMCS Users with permission to talk exceeds the maximum number of simultaneous talkers, the Multiuser Talker Control service alerts the entitled FRMCS User that is monitoring the communication, who is presented with the list of simultaneous talkers and the list of pending requests and decides who will keep the right to speak and who will be granted the permission to talk by selecting and de-selecting the corresponding FRMCS User.
+
+The Multiuser Talker Control service configures the system accordingly.
+
+The Multiuser Talker Control service sends an indication to the FRMCS Users whose permission to talk has been changed due to that.
+
+#### 9.7.5.4 Post-conditions
+
+Permission to talk is granted to the selected FRMCS Users.
+
+### 9.7.5.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.7.5-001] | Multiuser Talker Control shall keep track of FRMCS Users with permission to talk and FRMCS Users requesting to talk. | A | 22.179 | [R-6.2.3.7.3-004]
[R-6.2.3.7.4.1-002] |
+| [R-9.7.5-002] | Multiuser Control shall use a set of criteria provided by the communication application, like priorities, identities, etc. to manage the requests automatically. | A | 22.179 | [R-6.2.3.7.4.1-003] |
+| [R-9.7.5-003] | Based on its functional identity an entitled FRMCS User shall be able to select and de-select simultaneous talkers. | A | 22.179 | Partly covered by participant type [R-6.2.3.7.4.1-002]
[R-6.2.3.7.4.1-006] override mechanism by authorized participant. |
+| [R-9.7.5-004] | If the number of FRMCS Users with permission to talk does not exceed the maximum number of simultaneous talkers, the Multiuser Talker Control service shall grant automatically the permission to additional requestors. | A | 22.179 | [R-6.2.3.7.4.1-001]
[R-6.2.3.7.4.1-004] |
+| [R-9.7.5-005] | If the number of FRMCS Users with permission to talk exceeds the maximum number of simultaneous talkers:
the Multiuser Talker Control shall decide based on certain criteria, like priorities, functional identity, etc. who will keep the right to talk and who will be granted the permission to talk. Affected FRMCS Users shall be informed of their changed permission to talk. | A | 22.179 | [R-6.2.3.7.4.1-001]
[R-6.2.3.7.4.1-004] |
+| [R-9.7.5-006] | If the number of FRMCS Users with permission to talk exceeds the maximum number of simultaneous talkers:
the Multiuser Talker Control service shall present an entitled FRMCS User is monitoring the communication, with the list of simultaneous talkers and the list of pending requests to decides who will keep the right to speak, who will be granted the permission to talk. Affected FRMCS Users shall be informed of their changed | A | 22.179 | [R-6.2.3.7.4.1-005]
[R-6.2.3.7.4.1-006] |
+
+| | | | | |
+|--|---------------------|--|--|--|
+| | permission to talk. | | | |
+|--|---------------------|--|--|--|
+
+## 9.7.6 Use case: Revoke permission to talk
+
+### 9.7.6.1 Description
+
+There are occasions in the railway environment where it is needed to mitigate the risk of miscommunication. Use cases include, for example:
+
+- Emergency communication
+- Shunting communication
+- Trackside worker communication
+
+The system shall be able to limit the number of simultaneous talkers in a voice communication.
+
+The list of FRMCS Users with permission to talk shall be available to the Multiuser Talker Control service.
+
+An entitled FRMCS User who monitors the progress of the communication shall be able at any point to revoke the permission to talk of any of the FRMCS Users with permission to talk. Automatic revocation of talkers in case the maximum number of simultaneous talkers has been reached and a request to talk is received, is included in the use case above.
+
+### 9.7.6.2 Pre-conditions
+
+A number of FRMCS Users are in an active voice communication for which Multiuser Talker Control is enabled and have been granted permission to talk.
+
+An entitled FRMCS User is monitoring the progress of the communication and shall be able at any point to revoke the permission to talk of any of the FRMCS Users currently with permission to talk.
+
+### 9.7.6.3 Service flows
+
+The Multiuser Talker Control service presents a list of simultaneous talkers to an entitled FRMCS User, who decides who will not keep the right to speak by de-selecting the corresponding FRMCS User.
+
+The Multiuser Talker Control service configures the system accordingly.
+
+The Multiuser Talker Control service sends an indication to the FRMCS Users who have modified their situation with respects to the permission to talk.
+
+The FRMCS User is no longer able to talk after the entitled FRMCS User has changed the permission.
+
+### 9.7.6.4 Post-conditions
+
+Permission to talk is revoked for the de-selected FRMCS Users.
+
+### 9.7.6.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------------|
+| [R-9.7.6-001] | An entitled FRMCS User who monitors the progress of the communication shall be able at any point to revoke the permission to talk of any of the FRMCS Users currently with permission to talk. | A | 22.179 | [R-6.2.3.7.4.1-008] |
+| [R-9.7.6-002] | The FRMCS User who's permission to talk has been revoked, shall no longer be able to talk after the entitled FRMCS User has revoked the permission. | A | 22.179 | [R-6.2.3.7.4.1-004] |
+
+## 9.8 Authorisation of communication
+
+### 9.8.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to authorisation of communication are described, the following use cases are identified:
+
+- Permit / deny communication
+
+### 9.8.2 Use case: Permit / deny communication
+
+#### 9.8.2.1 Description
+
+The purpose of the authorisation function is to allow the network operator to control and regulate communications in order to avoid disruption/distraction to the users (for example Drivers during voice communication) and preventing unauthorised communication and to minimise network load.
+
+The FRMCS System may therefore restrict communication based on a configurable access matrix related to the FRMCS subscriber identity, the FRMCS Functional Identity of the equipment, the FRMCS User Identity, the FRMCS Functional Identity of the FRMCS Users considering the source and destination address.
+
+Decision to permit or deny communication is based on full or subparts of the FRMCS Functional Identity of the FRMCS Users. An example of a full FRMCS Functional Identity of an FRMCS User is a specific driver on a specific train. An example of a subpart of an FRMCS Functional Identity of an FRMCS User is all train drivers.
+
+#### 9.8.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+An FRMCS User attempts to establish a communication.
+
+#### 9.8.2.3 Service flows
+
+Upon an attempt to establish a communication, the FRMCS System checks if the source FRMCS User address is allowed to invite the destination FRMCS User address. The FRMCS System shall consider for the verification process the source and destination FRMCS User address.
+
+If multiple identities are simultaneously active to a FRMCS User, the following order shall be applied to determine the authorisation of the communication establishment:
+
+- Functional identities or subparts of functional identities related to the FRMCS User
+- FRMCS User Identity
+- FRMCS functional identities related to the equipment
+- FRMCS subscriber identity
+
+If the FRMCS User is allowed to establish the communication, the FRMCS System proceeds the communication setup.
+
+If the FRMCS User is not allowed establish the communication, the FRMCS System shall reject the attempt including the reason of the rejection.
+
+#### 9.8.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+Either the communication has been established or the FRMCS User has been informed about the denial of the call attempt.
+
+#### 9.8.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.8.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to control and restrict the establishment of communication in order to avoid disruption/distraction of the FRMCS Users (for example Drivers). | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 sub-clause 6.7.3 Requirement [R-6.7.3-007a] |
+| [R-9.8.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall be able to restrict communication based on related to the FRMCS subscriber identity, the FRMCS Equipment Identity, the FRMCS Functional Identity of the equipment, the FRMCS User Identity, the FRMCS Functional Identity or subparts of the FRMCS Functional Identity of the FRMCS Users considering the source and destination address. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 Requirements [R-5.17-001] for group calls and [R-6.7.2-002] for private calls. Covered by [R-5.9a-020] and [R-5.9a-021] for functional identities. Not covered for subparts of functional identities. |
+| [R-9.8.2-003] | The FRMCS System shall inform the FRMCS User in case the FRMCS User is not allowed to establish a communication. | A | TS 22.280 | Implicit in many requirements. |
+
+### 9.9 Authorisation of application
+
+#### 9.9.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to authorisation of application are described, the following use case is identified
+
+- Enabling/Disabling applications
+
+- Robust mission critical group communication services
+- Enabling/Disabling communication privileges per FRMCS User based on identities/talker status
+
+## 9.9.2 Use case: Enabling/Disabling applications
+
+### 9.9.2.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS System shall allow the network operators to control the use of FRMCS Applications in order to avoid disruption/distraction to the FRMCS Users (for example Drivers), preventing unauthorised usage according to his Role.
+
+The FRMCS System shall therefore be able to enable / disable FRMCS Applications for a FRMCS User depending on subscriber identity, the functional identity of the FRMCS Equipment, the FRMCS User Identity or the functional identity/ies of the FRMCS User. Also, context based criteria like location and other conditions are to be taken into account.
+
+### 9.9.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User equipment is powered on and the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS User equipment has started.
+
+### 9.9.2.3 Service flows
+
+#### Power-on
+
+After powering on the FRMCS Equipment and start of the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS Equipment, the FRMCS System enables the FRMCS Application(s) on the FRMCS Equipment according to the Role related to the FRMCS subscriber identity.
+
+#### Change of registration status
+
+Upon a change in registration status by registration / deregistration to / from a functional identity, change of a functional identity, user login /logout to / from the FRMCS System, the FRMCS System enables / disables applications.
+
+If multiple identities are active, the following order is used to determine the correct state:
+
+- FRMCS functional identities related to the FRMCS User
+- FRMCS User identity
+- FRMCS functional Identities related to the FRMCS Equipment
+- FRMCS subscriber identity
+
+If a FRMCS User has registered to multiple functional identities, the FRMCS User is authorised to use all applicable FRMCS Applications related to the different FRMCS functional identities.
+
+If an FRMCS Application is relying on other FRMCS Applications, enabling of all required FRMCS Applications is managed by the FRMCS System.
+
+Only authorised FRMCS Applications shall be presented to the FRMCS User.
+
+#### Change of location
+
+If the FRMCS User enters a certain area, the FRMCS System may prevent the use of FRMCS Application(s) which had been authorised previously.
+
+If the FRMCS User enters a certain area, the FRMCS System may enable the use of FRMCS Application(s) which had not been authorised previously.
+
+If a FRMCS Application is relying on other FRMCS Applications, enabling of all required FRMCS Applications is managed by the FRMCS System.
+
+Only authorised FRMCS Applications shall be presented to the FRMCS User.
+
+#### **9.9.2.4 Post-conditions**
+
+The FRMCS User has access to all authorised FRMCS Applications.
+
+### 9.9.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.9.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall allow the network operator to control the use of FRMCS Applications in order to avoid disruption/distraction to the FRMCS Users (for example Drivers), preventing unauthorised usage according to his Role. | A | TS 22.280, requirement [R-6.6.4.2-002]
[R-6.7.3-007]
[R-6.7.3-007a] | Covered for both group and private communications with CR 0053 to TS 22.280 |
+| [R-9.9.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall be able to enable / disable FRMCS Applications for a FRMCS User depending on subscriber identity, the functional identity of the FRMCS Equipment, the FRMCS User Identity or the functional identity/ies of the FRMCS User. The FRMCS System shall also be able to take context-based criteria like location, speed, direction of travel and other conditions be taken into account. | A | TS 22.280, requirement [R-6.6.4.2-002] | Covered for group communication with CR 0053 to TS 22.280 |
+| [R-9.9.2-003] | After powering on the FRMCS Equipment and start of the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS Equipment, the FRMCS System shall enable the FRMCS Application(s) on the FRMCS Equipment according to the Role related to the FRMCS subscriber identity. | A | Not applicable | This is related to implementation and is outside 3GPP scope. |
+| [R-9.9.2-004] | Upon a change in registration status by registration / deregistration to / from a functional identity, a change of a functional identity, user login /logout to / from the FRMCS System, the FRMCS System shall be able to enable / disable applications. | A | [TS 22.280, requirement [R-5.9a-001] | |
+| [R-9.9.2-005] | The FRMCS System shall allow the operator to configure the order in which the FRMCS functional Identities related to the FRMCS User identity FRMCS functional Identities related to the FRMCS Equipment FRMCS subscriber identity are evaluated to determine with the set of application authorised for use | A | Not covered | TS 22.280: only authorisation based on MCX Service User ID is supported. |
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.9.2-006] | If a FRMCS User has registered to multiple functional identities, the FRMCS User shall be authorised to use all applicable FRMCS Applications related to the different FRMCS functional identities. | A | Implicitly covered | This requirement is implicitly covered.
Chapter 5.9a.1 in TS 22.280 states that "The activation of the functional alias(es) will take place after the user has signed in to the MCX Service using the MCX User ID."
So the user is already authorized to use the services when functional ID is activated. |
+| [R-9.9.2-007] | If the FRMCS User enters a certain area, the FRMCS System shall prevent the use of FRMCS Application(s) which had been authorised previously. | A | Covered by [R-5.9a-015] in TS 22.280 | |
+| [R-9.9.2-008] | If the FRMCS User enters a certain area, the FRMCS System shall enable the use of FRMCS Application(s) which had not been authorised previously. | A | Covered by [R-5.9a-015] in TS 22.280 | |
+| [R-9.9.2-009] | If a FRMCS Application is relying on other FRMCS Applications, enabling of all required FRMCS Applications shall be managed by the FRMCS System. | A | Not applicable | This requirement should be covered in implementation. |
+
+### 9.9.3 Use case: Robust mission critical group communication services
+
+#### 9.9.3.1 Description
+
+For reliable railway services, conventional way is to use dualization methodology. Most of railway services are based on on-network communication, which is supported by base station and core networks under 3GPP standard. However, when disaster happens so that the communication infrastructure is not feasible, railway service based on the communication infrastructure cannot be maintained any more. From 3GPP Rel. 12, device-to-device communications has been considered to be supported not only in the transport layer but also in the application layer. In addition, interworking of FRMCS System with legacy systems including GSM-R and TRS is expected to be supported in Rel. 15. As a consequence, off-network and legacy systems will become feasible for group communication services in 3GPP technology. Therefore, by considering not only off-network but also legacy systems, reliability of mission critical group communication service in the on-network can be enhanced. Figure 9.9-1 depicts a required transformation of group communication service mode.
+
+#### 9.9.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+FRMCS Equipment for train driver, customer service staff, and train operations staff support device to device communications in the perspective of transport layer.
+
+FRMCS Equipment for train driver, customer service staff, and train operations staff support on-network, off-network group communication services in the perspective of applications layer.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the transformation of group communication service mode. It is divided into two horizontal sections by a large blue downward-pointing arrow. The top section shows a 'Customer Service Staff or Train Ops. Staff' box on the left and a 'Driver' box on the right, connected by a double-headed arrow labeled 'Group call service (via on-network)'. A thick blue curved line arches over these boxes. The bottom section shows the same 'Customer Service Staff or Train Ops. Staff' box on the left and 'Driver' box on the right, connected by a double-headed arrow labeled 'Group call service (via off-network or legacy network)'. A thick blue horizontal line is at the bottom of this section. The text 'Transformation of group call service mode by switching underlying communication network' is positioned to the right of the central arrow.
+
+Diagram illustrating the transformation of group communication service mode from on-network to off-network or legacy network.
+
+**Figure 9.9.3.2-1. Transformation of group communication service mode**
+
+### 9.9.3.3 Service Flows
+
+1. After initial disaster happens, emergency message (including voice or data) delivery service based on on-network group communication among train driver, customer service staff, or train operations staff have been preceded without any problem.
+2. Disaster becomes worse, and associated communication infrastructure is destroyed and is not usable anymore.
+3. Transformation of on-network group communication service into off-network or legacy network-based group communication service is accomplished among group members for maintaining the group communication services even in the worse disaster.
+
+### 9.9.1.4 Post-conditions
+
+Off-network or legacy network-based group communication among train driver, customer service staff, or train operations staff is activated and group communication service is maintained normally.
+
+### 9.9.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.9.3-001] | FRMCS Equipment shall support on-network based group communications. | A/T | TS 22.179
V.14.2.0 | Support |
+| [R-9.9.3-002] | FRMCS Equipment shall support off-network based group communications. | A/T | TS 22.179
V.14.2.0 | Support |
+| [R-9.9.3-003] | FRMCS Equipment should support legacy network- based group communications optionally. | A/T | N/A | Implementation option. |
+| [R-9.9.3-004] | FRMCS System shall provide a mechanism in the application layer to transform on-network based group communication into off-network based group communication. | A | TS 22.280 | Automatic and manual switching from on-network service to off-network service are supported.
[R-7.13-004] Ongoing MCX service communication interruption are minimized when switching from on-network to -off-network services. |
+| [R-9.9.3-005] | FRMCS System shall provide a mechanism in the application layer to transform on-network based group communication into legacy networkbased group communication. | A | 22.179
22.280 | TS 22.179
Project 25:
subclause 6.18.3.2.
TETRA: subclause 6.18.3.3.
TIA-603 systems:
subcla use 6.18.3.4.
GSM-R: 6.18.4.
TS 22.280
GSM-R: subclause 6.17.3.1. |
+
+### 9.9.3a Use case: Enabling/Disabling communication privileges per FRMCS User based on identities/talker status
+
+#### 9.9.3a.1 Description
+
+In addition to enable the control of use of FRMCS Applications, the FRMCS System shall allow the network operators and/or the FRMCS Users to control the use of FRMCS Applications with communication privileges per FRMCS User.
+
+FRMCS User authorization shall be based on the FRMCS User Identity and/or the functional identity/ies of the FRMCS User, the functional identity of the FRMCS Equipment, and/or the talker status for ongoing communications.
+
+Regarding this last parameter (i.e., communication privileges based on talker status), as an example, if an FRMCS User A who is involved as a listener in a voice communication, and FRMCS User B is talking in this voice communication, FRMCS User A is allowed or not to put on hold/leave/terminate the call, and/or to kick out FRMCS User B based on talker status of both FRMCS Users A and B.
+
+### 9.9.3a.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User equipment is powered on and the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS User equipment has started.
+
+### 9.9.3a.3 Service flows
+
+#### **Change of FRMCS User authentication and authorisation status**
+
+Upon a change in FRMCS User authentication and authorisation status, the FRMCS System triggers a change of communication privileges (e.g., FRMCS User profiles) for that particular FRMCS User.
+
+The following use cases are concerned:
+
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to initiate a private or group voice, video or data communication;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to put a group voice communication on hold;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to leave a group voice communication;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to terminate a private or group voice communication;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to merge Railway Emergency Alerts;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to kick out another FRMCS User from a group voice communication;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to invite another FRMCS User to a group voice communication.
+
+#### **Change of FRMCS User registration status**
+
+Upon a change in registration status by registration / deregistration to / from a functional identity, the FRMCS System triggers a change of communication privileges (e.g., FRMCS User profiles) for that particular FRMCS User.
+
+The following use cases are concerned:
+
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to initiate a private or group voice, video or data communication;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to put a group voice communication on hold;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to leave a group voice communication;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to terminate a private or group voice communication;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to merge Railway Emergency Alerts;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to kick out another FRMCS User from a group voice communication;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to invite another FRMCS User to a group voice communication.
+
+#### **Change of FRMCS User's talker status during ongoing group voice communication**
+
+Upon a change of talker status when an FRMCS User is involved in an ongoing group voice communication (i.e., the current talker becomes listener and vice-versa), the FRMCS System may be able to trigger a change of communication privileges (e.g., FRMCS User profiles) for all FRMCS Users affiliated to that group.
+
+The following use cases are concerned:
+
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to put an ongoing group voice communication on hold;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to leave an ongoing group voice communication;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to terminate an ongoing group voice communication;
+
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to merge Railway Emergency Alerts;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to kick out another FRMCS User from an ongoing group voice communication;
+- An FRMCS User is authorised or not to invite another FRMCS User to an ongoing group voice communication.
+
+#### 9.9.3a.4 Post-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User is authorized or not to use FRMCS Applications.
+
+### 9.9.3a.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.9.2-001] | When an FRMCS User performs MCX authentication and authorisation, the FRMCS System shall be able to trigger a change of communication privileges for that particular FRMCS User. | A | Partly covered (refer to communication privileges below) | Identification of the targeted user of the communication privilege status change: partly covered by MCX authentication and authorisation mechanism (MC ID only, no FA).
Change of user profiles on MCX authentication and authorisation: covered → MCX User Service Authorization is the function that validates whether or not a MCX user has the authority to access certain MCX services.
|
+| [R-9.9.2-002] | When an FRMCS User activates or deactivates Functional Alias(es), the FRMCS System shall be able to trigger a change of communication privileges for that particular FRMCS User. | A | Partly covered (refer to communication privileges below) | Identification of the targeted user of the communication privilege status change: covered by FA mechanism (MC ID + list of FA(s)).
Change of user profiles on FA activation or creation of new profiles for FA: not covered.
Editor's note: CR is needed
|
+| [R-9.9.2-003] | When the floor is granted or released for a particular FRMCS User (including multi-talker floor control), the FRMCS System shall be able to trigger a change of communication privileges for all FRMCS Users affiliated to that group . | A | Partly covered | Identification of the targeted users of the communication privilege status change: Partly covered. Only MCPTT ID(s) and list of FA(s) of the requester(s) (floor control request & multi-talker) are known by the system.
Editor's note: CR is needed
Change of user profiles when floor granted/released: not covered.
Editor's note: CR is needed
|
+| [R-9.9.2-004] | The FRMCS System shall support Communication privilege as (1) authorisation to put a group voice communication on hold. | A | Covered | Put a group voice communication on hold: covered by the affiliation mechanism which is considered sufficient to mimic the desired behaviour.
Authorisation mechanism: authorization of changing affiliation based on registration status by registration / deregistration to / from a functional identity or by talker status: not covered.
Editor's note: CR is needed
|
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.9.2-005] | The FRMCS System shall support Communication privilege as (2) authorisation to leave a group voice communication. | A | Covered | Leave a group voice communication: covered by the affiliation mechanism which is considered sufficient to mimic the desired behaviour.
Authorisation mechanism: authorization of changing affiliation based on registration status by registration / deregistration to / from a functional identity or by talker status: not covered.
Editor's note: CR is needed
|
+| [R-9.9.2-006] | The FRMCS System shall support Communication privilege as (3) authorisation to terminate a group voice communication. | A | Not covered | Terminate a group voice communication: strictly performed by the system.
Authorisation mechanism: not covered.
Editor's note: CR is needed
|
+| [R-9.9.2-007] | The FRMCS System shall support Communication privilege as (4) authorisation to merge Railway Emergency Alerts. | A | [Need analysis] | [Need analysis – finalize potential requirements for Merging of Railway Emergency Alerts first] |
+| [R-9.9.2-008] | The FRMCS System shall support Communication privilege as (5) authorisation to kick out another FRMCS User from a group voice communication. | A | Covered by 22.280 | Kick out another user: covered by remote change of affiliation (mandatory mode) 22.280 6.4.6.1.
Authorisation mechanism: authorization of changing affiliation based on registration status by registration / deregistration to / from a functional identity or by talker status: not covered.
Editor's note: CR is needed
|
+| [R-9.9.2-009] | The FRMCS System shall support Communication privilege as (6) authorisation to invite another FRMCS User to a group voice communication. | A | Covered by 22.280 | Invite a user to join: covered by remote change of affiliation (negotiated mode) 22.280 6.4.6.2.
Authorisation mechanism: authorization of changing affiliation based on registration status by registration / deregistration to / from a functional identity or by talker status: not covered.
Editor's note: CR is needed
|
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.9.2-010] | The FRMCS System shall support Communication privilege as (7) authorisation to initiate private voice, video or data communication. | A | Covered by 22.280 | Initiate private voice, video or data communication: covered by MC private call request mechanism.
Authorisation mechanism: covered by authorisation check based on user profile. |
+| [R-9.9.2-011] | The FRMCS System shall support Communication privilege as (8) authorisation to initiate group voice, video or data communication. | A | Covered by 22.280 | Initiate group voice, video or data communication: covered by group call request mechanism.
Authorisation mechanism: covered by authorisation check based on user profile. |
+
+## 9.10 Sharing FRMCS Equipment by FRMCS Users
+
+### 9.10.1 Description
+
+Commonly, FRMCS Users may share FRMCS Equipment, e.g. a trainborne UE. To use the shared equipment securely, it is needed to identify the user for the equipment.
+
+### 9.10.2 Pre-conditions
+
+A train driver is in a train.
+
+The train driver has an identification card.
+
+### 9.10.3 Service Flows
+
+The train driver wants to use a trainborne UE to make communication to train control centre.
+
+The train driver puts his/her identification card in the trainborne UE to identify himself/herself. In this case, the identification card is an example. It can be a type of ID number, finger-print, etc. instead.
+
+The trainborne UE reads the identification information from the card and requests authentication to FRMCS security server.
+
+FRMCS security server confirms the information and replies the authentication information to the trainborne UE.
+
+FRMCS registers the train driver as the user of the trainborne UE to relay a call for the train driver to the trainborne UE.
+
+The trainborne UE indicates readiness to use for the train driver.
+
+### 9.10.4 Post-conditions
+
+The train driver makes a call to the train control centre.
+
+The train driver receives a call using the trainborne UE that is relayed by FRMCS.
+
+## 9.10.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.10-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to provide a mean to identify a FRMCS User (for example, the train driver). | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 sub-clause 5.9a and covered by many requirements in MCX |
+| [R-9.10-002] | The FRMCS System shall be able to provide a mapping between the FRMCS User identification information and FRMCS Equipment in order to route communication. | A | TS 22.280 | Covered by many requirements in MCX |
+| [R-9.10-003] | The FRMCS System shall be able to provide communication routing based on the mapping information. | A | TS 22.280 | Covered by many requirements in MCX |
+| [R-9.10-004] | The FRMCS System should provide functions for the shared FRMCS Equipment to get identification information from the FRMCS User who wants to use the equipment. | A | TS 22.280 | Covered by many requirements in MCX |
+
+## 9.11 FRMCS naming authority
+
+### 9.11.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS Naming Authority (NA) is a registry service provided by FRMCS System to facilitate the handling of various namespaces, number spaces or other information sets needed to support FRMCS services.
+
+For example, FRMCS User identification requires a registry to manage the identification information which shall not be duplicated during its registration process.
+
+### 9.11.2 Pre-conditions
+
+A new train driver is registered as a new user of FRMCS.
+
+A new trainborne UE is installed in a train.
+
+### 9.11.3 Service Flows
+
+The new train driver wants to use FRMCS System.
+
+The train driver makes a request to register the user identification information in FRMCS with his/her finger-print as an identification method.
+
+The FRMCS checks the duplication of the user identification under the guidance of FRMCS NA and registers the user identification information in its registry.
+
+The train driver installs a new trainborne UE in the train. During the installation process, the trainborne UE is registered as a new FRMCS UE in FRMCS registry under the guidance of FRMCS NA to avoid duplication of FRMCS UE address.
+
+### 9.11.4 Post-conditions
+
+The train driver is registered as a new user in FRMCS System without duplication of user identification information.
+
+The trainborne UE is installed in the train and is registered as a new FRMCS UE in FRMCS System without duplication of UE address.
+
+### 9.11.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------|
+| [R-9.11-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to avoid duplication of identities. | A | 22.280 | covered by 22.280 [R-6.9-002] |
+
+## 9.12 Wayside-Centric Automatic Train Control
+
+### 9.12.1 Description
+
+Signalling block system, which is a fundamental factor in the perspective of train control, enables the safe and efficient operation of railways to avoid collisions between trains. The signalling block system basically keeps a train away from entering the block occupied by the other train. It is commonly known that moving block system compared to fixed block system. As shown in Figure 9.12-1, the train in moving block system can approach the leading train more closely.
+
+
+
+Figure 9.12-1: Examples of various railways block systems. The diagram illustrates three scenarios of train control on a single-track line. In the top scenario (Fixed Block System), a train is approaching a red signal from the left, and another train is ahead of it. The signals are connected by orange lines, indicating fixed blocks. In the middle scenario (Moving Block System), the train is closer to the red signal, and the orange line representing the block boundary is shorter. In the bottom scenario (Moving Block System), the train is even closer to the red signal, and the orange line is the shortest, showing that the train can approach the leading train more closely in a moving block system.
+
+Figure 9.12-1 Examples of various railways block systems
+
+One way to realize the moving block system is that a centralized server communicates with trains and manages the moving block based on the positions of the trains. The On-board Automatic Train Protection (OATP), which is on the train, report the position of the train to the Wayside Automatic Train Protection (WATP), and the WATP decides and provide the movement authority of the train to the OATP. The train controls itself based on the movement authority, and trigger brake when it approaches the border of its authorized moving area.
+
+### 9.12.2 Pre-conditions
+
+1. The user equipment dedicated to train control gets power-on, and registers to the train control system.
+2. WATPs are located in the Packet Data Network (PDN), and each train knows the nearby WATP which can offer a movement authority and make it move.
+3. The user equipment establishes a connection through the 3GPP network for transporting periodical data between WATP and OATP.
+
+### 9.12.3 Service flows
+
+1. The OATP periodically report its position to the serving WATP.
+2. The WATP periodically provide movement authority to the OATP
+3. The train accelerates, or triggers brake based on the last received movement authority. It moves till the position that it is authorized to move, and stops if it reaches to the border of the authorized area.
+
+### 9.12.4 Post-conditions
+
+The train triggers emergency brake and stops immediately if the connection is lost and data is not received for a certain time from WATP.
+
+### 9.12.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Requirement Reference Number | Requirement text | Application/ Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [9.12-001] | The FRMCS System shall provide a mechanism for a train to autonomously discover an assigned application server which can offer movement authority. | A/T | 22.280 | This requirement is covered by the combination of functional alias, affiliation mechanism, and IP connectivity. |
+| [9.12-002] | Train control data shall be able to be transported with the highest priority. | T | 22.280 | Covered by 22.280 [R-6.8.7.2-001], [R-6.8.7.2-010] and [R-5.1.7-002]. |
+
+## 9.13 Autonomous Train Control and Operation
+
+### 9.13.1 Description
+
+In legacy train control systems, trains typically decide its movement by interacting with trackside devices (e.g. track circuits, balise, radio block system) or communicating with a trackside server. If a train can autonomously figure out the positions of the nearby trains and decide its movement authority, the transport capacity of the railway will be enhanced. In the autonomous train control system whose service concept is aligned to the eV2X service, trains share its position by exchanging the information without any centralized server, and each train decides how far it can be authorized to move based on the position information. It is expected that main application area will be mass transportation such as subway.
+
+
+
+Figure 9.13.-1: An example of autonomous train control scenario. The diagram shows two states of a railway track. On the left, two trains are on a track with a switch. Above the track, there are two signal boxes connected by a double-headed arrow. Below the signal boxes, there are four antennas. Dashed lines connect the antennas to the trains. On the right, the trains have moved past the switch. The signal boxes and antennas are still present. Dashed lines connect the antennas to the trains, and a dashed line also connects the trains to the signal boxes. The track has a switch that leads to a lower level.
+
+Figure 9.13.-1 An example of autonomous train control scenario
+
+### 9.13.2 Pre-conditions
+
+1. Trains know the overall schedule, and the user equipment of each train is connected to the user equipment of the other trains operating at the same time.
+2. A user equipment of each train is able to establish a connection with the object Controller for the nearby point machine.
+
+### 9.13.3 Service Flows
+
+1. A train gets started and try registration to the currently operating trains. The registration message includes the position of the train.
+2. The train gets the responses of the registration from the other trains and estimates the positions of the trains.
+3. The train decides its movement authority based on the position information and starts moving.
+4. The train positions in the corresponding areas are shared through multicasting.
+5. Based on the periodically updated information, each train updates its movement authority and conduct train control based on it.
+6. If needed, the train connects to the nearby point machine and sends switch command.
+
+### 9.13.4 Post-conditions
+
+The autonomous train control is achieved by activating movement authority for each train or activating object Controller for nearby point machine.
+
+### 9.13.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Requirement Reference Number | Requirement text | Application/ Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [9.13-001] | The 3GPP network shall provide a mechanism using on-network communications to establish a bearer from a user equipment to the other user equipment | A | 22.280 | The requirement of [R-5.9a-002] "The MC User shall be reached by its functional alias(es) from within the MCX Service system where the functional alias was activated." Includes point to point MCData transport service. |
+| [9.13-002] | The 3GPP network shall provide an efficient way to disseminate data to multiple FRMCS UEs for train control. | A/T | 22.282
22.280 | The requirements of [R-6.2.2.1-002a] and [R-6.2.2.1-002b] of 22.282 include a dissemination of data to multiple receiving users. The efficient way of the dissemination is covered by functional alias in 5.9a requirements of 22.280. |
+| [9.13-003] | The 3GPP network shall be able to multicast train control data originated from one FRMCS UE to the other FRMCS UE. | A/T | 22.282 | The requirements of [R-6.2.2.1-002a] and [R-6.2.2.1-002b] include a multicast of data to chosen receiving users. |
+| [9.13-004] | The FRMCS System shall provide a mechanism to discover feasible objects for point machine. | A | 22.280 | Covered by [R-5.9a-002] "The MCX User shall be reachable by its functional alias(es) from within the MCX Service system where the functional alias was activated." |
+
+## 9.14 Virtual Coupling
+
+### 9.14.1 Description
+
+One of the important missions that the future railway service should achieve is to increase its transport capacity. A straight-forward solution is to minimize the distance between successive trains so that train interval is reduced. It is difficult to do so in a legacy train control system, because the successive trains need to have distance as much as a safety margin, which should be larger than the full braking distance.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows two blue trains on a track. Above the track is a long blue double-headed arrow representing a communication channel. Four vertical lines with antenna icons connect this channel to the trains. The first train on the left has a yellow arrow pointing right. The second train on the right has a yellow arrow pointing right. A dashed blue line connects the first train to the second train, and a solid orange line connects the second train back to the first train, representing the exchange of control information.
+
+Diagram illustrating the sharing of acceleration and braking control information between two trains to shorten the safety margin.
+
+**Figure 9.14-1 Sharing acceleration and braking control information to shorten safety margin**
+
+This safety margin can be further shortened if the successive trains share control information (acceleration and braking) and apply it to its own train control. As shown in Figure 9.14.1, the safety margin can be shortened if the following train immediately knows that the leading train starts braking and also triggers braking. This is the fundamental principle and the main purpose of virtual coupling. Figure 9.14.2 shows the basic concept of the virtual coupling scenario. Multiple trains which are in close distance move together *as they are physically coupled*. As the distance between two trains gets smaller, the control information of a train should be delivered to the other in shorter time.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows three blue trains on a track, each with a yellow arrow pointing right. Above the track is a long blue double-headed arrow representing a communication channel. Four vertical lines with antenna icons connect this channel to the trains. A large blue padlock icon is positioned above the middle train, symbolizing the 'virtual coupling' of the trains.
+
+Diagram illustrating the concept of virtual coupling scenario with three trains.
+
+**Figure 9.14-2 The concept of virtual coupling scenario**
+
+### 9.14.2. Pre-conditions
+
+1. The leading and following trains in operation recognize each other and have just got configured to be coupled virtually.
+2. The user equipment for train control support device to device communications in the perspective of transport layer.
+
+
+
+Figure 9.14-3: Overall procedure of virtual coupling. The diagram shows three stages of two trains (leading and following) on a track. In the first stage, the trains are far apart, connected by a dashed orange line representing a 3GPP network connection. In the second stage, the trains are closer, and the connection is still dashed orange. In the third stage, the trains are very close, and the connection is a solid blue line, indicating a switch to a PC5 interface. A yellow circle with a lock icon is shown between the trains in the third stage, representing a safety barrier or secure connection.
+
+Figure 9.14-3 Overall procedure of virtual coupling
+
+### 9.14.3 Service Flows
+
+1. The following train begins to approach to the leading train by exchanging the information about their position. The two trains, which are far enough to allow a certain amount of end-to-end latency, are initially connected through the 3GPP network.
+2. As the following train approaches to the leading train, they start exchanging the information about movement control and each train then controls itself while considering the control of the other train. The two trains, which are still far enough to allow a certain amount of end-to-end latency, keep the connection through the 3GPP network.
+3. As the following train further approaches to the leading train, the safe braking distance gets shorter and they are required to have a connection of which end-to-end latency is very short for delicate train control. At this moment, they seamlessly switch the connection from the 3GPP network to PC5 interface
+
+### 9.14.4 Post-conditions
+
+For safety train operation, integrity needs to be checked for train control information delivery in the perspective of application or transport layer. Any error on integrity check shall be immediately reported to the train control application.
+
+## 9.14.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Requirement Reference Number | Requirement text | Application/ Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [9.14-001] | An On-board FRMCS UE for automatic train control shall be able to communicate through off-network up to 3km in the line of sight channel environment. | T | 22.289 | This requirement is covered by section 5.2.2 of TS22.289 |
+| [9.14-002] | Integrity protection shall be provided for each data transfer between FRMCS UEs for train control | A/T | 22.280 | Covered by [R-5.12-001] The MCX Service shall provide a means to support the confidentiality and integrity of all user traffic and signalling at the application layer." |
+| [9.14-003] | The 3GPP system shall support service continuity between on-network based connection and off-network based connection. | A/T | 22.280 | [R-7.11-001] An MCX UE shall be capable of utilizing off-network MCX Service communications and on-network MCX Service communications at the same time. [R-7.13-004] On-going MCX service communication interruption are minimized when switching from on-network to -off-network services. |
+| [9.14-004] | FRMCS UEs for train control shall communicate through off-network, where the FRMCS UEs' relative speed is less than 40km/h. | T | 22.289 | This requirement is covered by section 5.2.2 of TS22.289 |
+
+## 9.15 Composite-based train operation
+
+### 9.15.1 Description
+
+This use case considers the composition and decomposition of trains or tractions. One is the case, where two autonomous trains / traction (train A and train B) are conducted as one composition (Train C). The other case describes the decomposition of a train set (Train C) into autonomous train A and train B. For these scenarios, specific FRMCS Equipment Identity management need to be provided by the FRMCS System.
+
+## 9.15.2 Pre-conditions
+
+Train A and Train B share information for train operation such as position and velocity profile.
+
+## 9.15.3 Service Flows
+
+### Train composition
+
+1. Train/traction A and Train/traction B are autonomous trains and moving on different tracks.
+2. Train/traction A and the train/traction B are put together into one train composition using the same railway.
+3. Consequently, the different FRMCS UE identities of train/traction A and train/traction B are changed into common FRMCS UE identity composite train C/traction C.
+
+### Train decomposition
+
+1. Train/traction C which is the composition of train/traction A and train/traction B is moving along the railway.
+2. Based on the train routing i.e. different destination of train/traction A and train/traction B of train/traction A and train/traction B uses two different railways.
+
+Consequently, the FRMCS UE identity of train/traction C is decomposed again into FRMCS UE identities of train/traction A and train/traction B.
+
+## 9.15.4 Post-conditions
+
+1. Train/traction C arrives at the destination consisting of train/traction A&B
+2. Train A and Train B arrive at the planned destination.
+
+## 9.15.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [9.15-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to assign and withdraw an FRMCS Equipment Identity common to several FRMCS Equipment, e.g. for trains being coupled together in order to be reachable under the same FRMCS Equipment Identity. | A | 22.280 | Covered by [R-5.9a-015] The MCX Service system shall allow an MCX Service Administrator to make use of information (e.g. operational schedules, locations, velocity or direction) from external sources to create or delete a functional alias. and [R-5.9a-18] The MCX Service shall support automatic activation and de-activation of a functional alias based on the operational criteria (e.g. MCX User ID, login/logoff from the MCX Service system, specific external information supplied by external systems). |
+
+## 9.16 Arbitration related use cases
+
+### 9.16.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to arbitration are defined. The following use cases are defined:
+
+- Arbitration
+- Arbitration for communication auto-connection
+
+### 9.16.2 Use case: Arbitration
+
+#### 9.16.2.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS System shall be able to perform arbitration, based on the context of the communication. Arbitration in this context means that the FRMCS System is able to determine the behaviour of the end user device in case of multiple competing communications. Additionally, the FRMCS System may ask the FRMCS User which communication to accept.
+
+#### 9.16.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS System is authorised to perform arbitration on communication on the end user device.
+
+#### 9.16.2.3 Service flows
+
+##### Incoming communication
+
+When the communication is received by the FRMCS User on any of its registered functional identities, the FRMCS System provides to the FRMCS User arbitration information.
+
+FRMCS System is able to present arbitration options to the FRMCS User to select from.
+
+Arbitration of communication determines automatically to accept, reject, put on hold or queue the incoming and/or the ongoing communication, based on both the incoming and the ongoing communication characteristics.
+
+##### Outgoing communication
+
+The FRMCS User is initiating a new communication. Arbitration information is available from the FRMCS application.
+
+The arbitration application has the possibility to present arbitration options to the end user to select from.
+
+The arbitration application decides to accept, reject, and put on hold or queue, the ongoing and/or the new communication, based on both the incoming and the ongoing communication characteristics.
+
+#### 9.16.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The communication is established to the FRMCS Equipment the FRMCS User has selected.
+
+#### 9.16.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------|----------|
+| [R-9.16.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to provide communication to the | A | TS 22.280 section 6.19.1 | |
+
+| | | | | |
+|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| | FRMCS User based on the arbitration information associated with the communication. | | | |
+| [R-9.16.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall be able to accept, reject, hold, queue or prompt the user for his choice on the incoming communication. | A | TS 22.280 | Automatic arbitration in on-network mode: covered by requirements in section 6.19.1: MCX request to transmit are granted, rejected or queued (put on hold and queue are considered as similar mechanism).
Automatic arbitration in off-network mode: covered by requirements in section 7.3.2.
Manual arbitration (user selection) in on-network mode: accept and reject are covered by section 6.7.6. Mechanism to queue is not covered.
Manual arbitration (user selection) in off-network mode is not covered.
|
+| [R-9.16.2-003] | When the FRMCS User is using multiple FRMCS Equipment simultaneously, the FRMCS System shall be able to establish the communication to the appropriate FRMCS Equipment, based on FRMCS User selected option. | A | TS 22.280 | [R-6.7.2-005] |
+
+## 9.16.3 Use case: Arbitration for communication auto-connection
+
+### 9.16.3.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS System shall be able to automatically accept incoming communications without asking the FRMCS User, based on configuration (i.e., configured arbitration rules).
+
+### 9.16.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS System is authorised to perform arbitration on communication on the FRMCS Equipment (i.e., end user device).
+
+### 9.16.3.3 Service flows
+
+#### **FRMCS User is using a single FRMCS Equipment**
+
+When the communication is received by the FRMCS User on any of its identities (including registered functional identities), the FRMCS System automatically accepts the incoming private or group communication if arbitration rules are configured to do so.
+
+#### **FRMCS User is using multiple FRMCS Equipment simultaneously**
+
+If arbitration rules allow configuration for automatic answering and if an FRMCS User is logged in multiple FRMCS Equipment simultaneously, the FRMCS System automatically accepts the incoming private or group communication to the FRMCS User's default FRMCS Equipment when the communication is received by the FRMCS User on any of its registered functional identities.
+
+The FRMCS User's default FRMCS Equipment is set up by either the FRMCS User or by the FRMCS System Administrator.
+
+If the FRMCS System fails to automatically accept the incoming private or group communication to the FRMCS User's default FRMCS Equipment, the FRMCS System automatically accepts the incoming private or group communication to another FRMCS Equipment the FRMCS User is logged in.
+
+#### **Arbitration rules**
+
+Arbitration rules allows configuration for automatic answering based on:
+
+- The FRMCS User identities;
+- The FRMCS User registered functional identities;
+- The FRMCS Application identities;
+- The FRMCS User's default FRMCS Equipment.
+
+### 9.16.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The incoming communication is automatically accepted to the relevant FRMCS Equipment the FRMCS User is logged in.
+
+### 9.16.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.16.3-001] | When an incoming private communication is received by the FRMCS User, the FRMCS System shall be able to automatically accept the communication if arbitration rules are configured to do so (based on FRMCS User identities, registered functional identities or FRMCS Application types). | A | 22.280 | Partly covered by private call setup in automatic commencement mode (request for automatic commencement mode – automatic answering – is triggered by the calling party, not by the System).
In addition, configuration for automatic commencement mode is based on MC User ID only. Arbitration rules based on FRMCS Application types (i.e., MCPTT, MCData or MCVideo) is supported but not on Functional Alias(es).
Editor's note: CR is needed. |
+| [R-9.16.3-002] | When an incoming group communication is received by the FRMCS User, the FRMCS System shall be able to automatically accept the communication if arbitration rules are configured to do so (based on FRMCS User identities, registered functional identities or FRMCS Application types). | A | 22.280 | Covered by affiliation and functional alias mechanisms. |
+| [R-9.16.3-003] | When the FRMCS User is using multiple FRMCS Equipment simultaneously, the FRMCS System shall be able to automatically accept an incoming private communication to the default FRMCS Equipment. | A | 22.280 | Covered by 5.10 Support for multiple devices (i.e., multiple MCX UEs) and [R-6.7.2-005] default device designated by the receiving user.
Editor's note on multiple devices support: default UE covered by stages 2&3? (didn't find it) |
+| [R-9.16.3-004] | The default FRMCS Equipment is configured by either the FRMCS User or by the FRMCS System Administrator. | A | 22.280 | Partly covered by 5.10 Support for multiple devices (i.e., multiple MCX UEs) and [R-6.7.2-005]: only the receiving user can designate the default device. |
+| [R-9.16.3-005] | When the FRMCS User is using multiple FRMCS Equipment simultaneously, the FRMCS System shall be able to automatically accept an incoming private communication to other FRMCS Equipment if communication to the default FRMCS Equipment fails to be established. | A | 22.280 | Not covered by [R-6.7.2-005]: it is up to the receiving user to detect that something is wrong with default UE and then to select another UE to receive incoming call.
Editor's note on multiple devices support: selection of default UE “on the fly” supported or only during MC Registration? |
+
+## 9.17 Data communication to exchange key information for train safety application use cases
+
+### 9.17.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to Key management communication are defined. The following use cases are defined:
+
+- Initiation of a Key Management data communication
+- Termination of a Key Management data communication
+- Service interworking and service continuation with GSM-R
+
+### 9.17.2 Use case: Initiation of a Key Management data communication
+
+#### 9.17.2.1 Description
+
+Key Management communication is the application which performs the functions that ensure the exchange of credentials/keys required by other applications (such as ATO, ATP) to ensure the correct authentication of the end users of each application and the integrity of the messages exchanged.
+
+Some Key Management systems require radio communication to interchange the relevant data between a train and its corresponding key distribution centre (Key Management Center). This key distribution centre may be located in the same network or in an external network.
+
+The users in this case are the Key Management applications both on-board of the train and in the key distribution centre at the trackside (ground system).
+
+Key Management communication is considered to be user-to-user data communication.
+
+The communication of keys may be requested each time that an ATP or ATO communication session is established or at any other time, depending on the specific configuration of the Key Management application.
+
+#### 9.17.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The initiating application on the FRMCS equipment is authorised to initiate the Key Management data communication. This is managed by the authorisation of communication application.
+
+The receiving application on the FRMCS equipment is authorised to use the Key Management data communication. This is managed by the authorisation of communication application.
+
+#### 9.17.2.3 Service flows
+
+The initiating application on the FRMCS equipment (e.g. on-board of the train or the key distribution centre at the track side) initiates the Key Management data communication to the receiving side on the FRMCS equipment (e.g. key distribution centre at the trackside or on-board of the train). The QoS profile of the communication is managed by the QoS Profile application. The data communication requests the QoS profile which matches the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see [QoS]) within the FRMCS system, depending on the application needs.
+
+The FRMCS system establishes the bearer service required for the data communication within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see [QoS]).
+
+The arbitration is managed by the arbitration application on the FRMCS equipment.
+
+The communication is recorded by the Data recording and access to recorded data application.
+
+#### **9.17.2.4 Post-conditions**
+
+The initiating application on the FRMCS equipment is connected to the receiving application.
+
+Data can be exchanged between the Key Management applications.
+
+### 9.17.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.17.2.5-001] | For Key management communication, the communication shall be considered to be user-to-user data communication. | A | TS 22.282 | TS 22.282
Sub-clause: 5.5
Note: Application Layer Key Management is transparent to the transport and communications services. Reference transport. |
+| [R-9.17.2.5-002] | For Key management communication, the initiating and the receiving application on the FRMCS equipment shall be able to be authorised to initiate the Key management communication. This shall be managed by the authorisation of data communication application. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280
Sub-clause: 5.5, and 5.12.
Note: Application Layer Key Management is transparent to the transport and communications services. |
+| [R-9.17.2.5.2-003] | For Key management communication, the initiating application on the FRMCS equipment (e.g. on-board of the train or the key distribution centre at the track side) shall be able to initiate the Key Management data communication to the receiving side on the FRMCS equipment (e.g. key distribution centre at the trackside or on-board of the train). The QoS profile of the communication shall be managed by the QoS Profile application. The data communication shall be able to request the QoS profile which matches the application category of CRITICAL DATA (see [QoS]) within the FRMCS system, depending on the application needs. | A | N/A | See sub-clause 12.10. |
+| [R-9.17.2.5-004] | For Key management communication, the FRMCS system shall be able to establish the bearer service required for the data communication within a setup time specified as IMMEDIATE (see [QoS]). | A | N/A | See sub-clause 12.10. |
+
+| | | | | |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|-----------|-----------------------------|
+| [R-9.17.2.5-005] | For Key management communication, the arbitration shall be managed by the arbitration application on the FRMCS equipment. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 Sub-clause: 6.4.7 |
+| [R-9.17.2.5-006] | For Key management communication, the communication shall be recorded by the recording and access to recorded data application. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 sub-clause 6.15.4 |
+
+### 9.17.3 Use case: Termination of a Key Management data communication
+
+#### 9.17.3.1 Description
+
+The initiating or the receiving application can terminate the Key Management data communication.
+
+#### 9.17.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The Key Management applications on-board and trackside have a data communication initiated.
+
+#### 9.17.3.3 Service flows
+
+The terminating application on the FRMCS equipment (e.g. on-board of the train or the key distribution centre at the track side) terminates the Key Management data communication with the receiving side application on the FRMCS equipment (e.g. key distribution centre at the trackside or on-board of the train).
+
+The FRMCS system terminates the bearer service required for the data communication.
+
+#### 9.17.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The terminating Key Management data application is disconnected from the receiving application.
+
+### 9.17.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-9.17.3.5-001] | For Key management communication, the terminating application on the FRMCS equipment (e.g. on-board of the train or the key distribution centre at the track side) shall be able to terminate the Key Management data communication with the receiving side application on the FRMCS equipment (e.g. key distribution centre at the trackside or on-board of the train). | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280
Sub-clause: 5.5, and 5.12.
Note: Application Layer Key Management is transparent to the transport and communications services. |
+| [R-9.17.3.5-002] | For Key management communication, the FRMCS system shall be able to terminate the bearer service required for the data communication. | A | TS 22.282 | TS 22.282
Sub-clause: 5.5
Note: Application Layer Key Management is transparent to the transport and communications services.
Reference transport. |
+
+### 9.17.4 Use case: service interworking and service continuation with GSM-R
+
+#### 9.17.4.1 Description
+
+For migration purposes the service interworking and service continuation between the GSM-R system and FRMCS system for Key Management data communication needs to be clear.
+
+Depending on the migration scenario a key distribution centre can be attached to the FRMCS system, to the GSM-R system or both. The on-board Key Management application can be attached either in the GSM-R system or in the FRMCS system. Functional identities are applicable in one system only.
+
+This use case only applies to end user devices supporting both FRMCS and GSM-R systems.
+
+Online Key Management data exchange is supported only with a packet switched (PS) bearer in the GSM-R system. Therefore, for service interworking and service continuation only the PS bearer is required.
+
+#### 9.17.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The initiating application on the FRMCS equipment is authorised to initiate the Key Management data communication. This is managed by the authorisation of communication application.
+
+The receiving application on the FRMCS equipment is authorised to use the Key Management data communication. This is managed by the authorisation of communication application.
+
+#### 9.17.4.3 Service flows
+
+##### Initiating Key Management application attached to GSM-R
+
+When the initiating Key Management application on the FRMCS equipment is attached to the GSM-R system and is initiating data communication to another Key Management application, the GSM-R system will route the data communication accordingly.
+
+If the other Key Management application on the FRMCS equipment is attached to the FRMCS system, the GSM-R system can only route the data communication if the destination can be reached by an address or identity understood by the GSM-R system. The role management in FRMCS provides the appropriate address or identity e.g. by providing a mapping of GSM-R identities and FRMCS identities.
+
+The information from the role management and presence application is used to route the communication and to present the identities.
+
+#### **Initiating Key Management application attached to FRMCS**
+
+When the initiating Key Management application on the FRMCS equipment is attached to the FRMCS system and is initiating data communication to another Key Management application, the FRMCS system will route the communication accordingly.
+
+If the other Key Management application on the FRMCS equipment is attached to the GSM-R system, the FRMCS system can only route the data communication if the destination can be reached by an address or identity understood by the FRMCS system. The role management in FRMCS provides the appropriate address or identity e.g. by providing a mapping of GSM-R identities and FRMCS identities.
+
+The information from the role management and presence application is used to route the communication and to present the identities.
+
+#### **Key Management application moving from GSM-R to FRMCS**
+
+When the Key Management application on the FRMCS equipment is detached from the GSM-R system the FRMCS end user device shall provide service continuation by setting up the communication via the FRMCS system. An interruption of data communication is acceptable.
+
+#### **Key Management application moving from FRMCS to GSM-R**
+
+When the Key Management application on the FRMCS equipment is detached from the FRMCS system, the FRMCS end user device shall provide service continuation by setting up the communication via the GSM-R system. An interruption of data communication is acceptable.
+
+#### **9.17.4.4 Post-conditions**
+
+None.
+
+---
+
+## **10 Performance support applications related use cases**
+
+**Editor's Note: Text to be provided.**
+
+---
+
+## 11 Business support applications related use cases
+
+### 11.1 Charging and Billing information related use cases
+
+#### 11.1.1 Introduction
+
+In this chapter the use cases related to charging and billing are defined. The following use cases are defined:
+
+- Obtaining charging and billing information
+
+#### 11.1.2 Use case: Obtaining charging and billing information
+
+##### 11.1.2.1 Description
+
+The Railway operators may have the obligation or the desire to charge FRMCS Users of their FRMCS Networks, or to use billing information for statistical reasons.
+
+An entitled FRMCS User shall be able to obtain information for any type of FRMCS communications from the FRMCS system, to be able to generate bills.
+
+##### 11.1.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+An entitled FRMCS User is logged on to the FRMCS system.
+
+##### 11.1.2.3 Service flows
+
+The entitled FRMCS User requests billing information for a single FRMCS User or a group of FRMCS Users.
+
+The entitled FRMCS User selects defined criterias (e.g. timeframe, incoming communications, outgoing communications, numbers and/or any kind of FRMCS Identity) to get more detailed results.
+
+The entitled FRMCS User configures the FRMCS system to generate the billing information once or periodically.
+
+##### 11.1.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The requested billing information is generated from the FRMCS System.
+
+### 11.1.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-11.1.2-001] | The FRMS System shall be able to generate charging records for one or multiple FRMCS Users based on defined criterias (e.g. timeframe, incoming communications, outgoing communications, numbers and/or any kind of FRMCS Identity). | A/T | Partly covered (only CDR covered by 3GPP – billing system outside the 3GPP domain). | 6.15.4 |
+| [R-11.1.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall allow to charge separately for each type of FRMCS Application and/or each type of application category. | A/T | TS 22.261 section 9.2 | Support collection of charging information based on resource usage (e.g. QoS, applications). |
+| [R-11.1.2-003] | The FRMCS System shall allow to charge for different Service Attributes. | A/T | TS 22.261 section 9.2 | Support collection of charging information based on resource usage (e.g. QoS, applications). |
+
+---
+
+## 12 FRMCS System principles related use cases
+
+### 12.1 FRMCS System principles overview
+
+In this chapter, FRMCS System related use cases are described which are complying with principles such as:
+
+- Provide broadband and/or mission critical services with seamless connectivity
+- Offer high-quality control functions and real-time performance monitoring
+- Interworking with legacy systems including GSM-R and LMR
+- Build stable positioning framework for FRMCS services and devices including trainborne (in-train) and handheld (in-train, and in/out-door) UEs
+- Bearer flexibility
+- QoS in a railway environment
+- FRMCS System security framework
+
+To describe the use cases, an example system is assumed by adapting LTE for railway communication [4] as follows:
+
+
+
+Figure 12.1-1: An example system for FRMCS System principle use cases. The diagram shows a central 'FRMCS Domain' (dashed blue box) containing a 'Train Control Centre', a 'Backbone Network', a '3GPP Network (e.g. LTE)', 'UE', and 'Trainborne UE'. The 'Train Control Centre' is connected to the 'Backbone Network'. The 'Backbone Network' is connected to the '3GPP Network (e.g. LTE)' and also to an external 'Public Safety Mobile Comm. Network'. The '3GPP Network (e.g. LTE)' is connected to the 'UE' and 'Trainborne UE'. Outside the 'FRMCS Domain', 'GSM-R UE' and 'TRS UE' are connected to 'GSM-R' and 'TRS' clouds, which are in turn connected to the 'Backbone Network'. A 'Public Safety Centre' is connected to the 'Public Safety Mobile Comm. Network'.
+
+**Figure 12.1-1. An example system for FRMCS System principle use cases**
+
+The example system is consisted of the train control centre, 3GPP network such as LTE with UE and the trainborne UE. The backbone network connects the train control centre, 3GPP network and legacy systems. FRMCS System is interworking with the legacy systems such as GSM-R and TRS.
+
+## 12.2 Area Broadcast Group Communication interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS Users
+
+### 12.2.1 Description
+
+This use case describes an area broadcast group communication between FRMCS User(s) and GSM-R User(s), and vice versa.
+
+### 12.2.2 Pre-condition
+
+FRMCS User A and GSM-R User B and User C are authorized Users to perform group communication together by the FRMCS System.
+
+User A and User B and User C are in the same group communication area defined by the FRMCS System.
+
+### 12.2.3 Service flow
+
+#### FRMCS System to GSM-R
+
+FRMCS User A initiates a new area broadcast group communication (based on location etc., of GSM-R User B and C).
+
+FRMCS User A broadcasts group communication invitations to all Users in the same area.
+
+GSM-R User B and User C receive the group communication invitations.
+
+GSM-R User B and User C accept the invitation and join the group communication. Or GSM-R User B and User C automatically join this group communication.
+
+#### **GSM-R to FRMCS**
+
+GSM-R User B initiates a new group call (based on location etc., of FRMCS User A and GSM-R User C).
+
+GSM-R User B broadcasts group call invitations to all Users in the same area.
+
+FRMCS User A and GSM-R User C receive the group call invitations.
+
+FRMCS User A and GSM-R User C accept the invitation and join the group call. Or FRMCS User A and GSM-R User C automatically join this group call.
+
+### **12.2.4 Post-condition**
+
+FRMCS User A, GSM-R User B and User C can communicate among each other in a group call.
+
+### **12.2.5 Potential requirements**
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------|
+| [12.2-001] | FRMCS System shall provide a means to initiate group communication between FRMCS Users and GSM-R Users. | A | 22.179 | R-6.18.3.5-003 |
+| [12.2-002] | FRMCS System shall provide means to FRMCS Users to join the group calls of GSM-R | A | 22.179 | R-6.18.3.5-003 |
+
+## **12.3 Location Service interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS Users**
+
+### **12.3.1 Description**
+
+This use case allows FRMCS System and GSM-R system to obtain and share the location information of their users.
+
+### **12.3.2 Pre-condition**
+
+User A is an authorized FRMCS User.
+
+User B is an authorized GSM-R User.
+
+User A and User B are affiliated to a group that consists of FRMCS User(s) and GSM-R User(s).
+
+### **12.3.3 Service flow**
+
+#### ***FRMCS System to GSM-R***
+
+FRMCS User A sends a location request to the specific GSM-R User B.
+
+GSM-R User B accepts and return his location information as requested.
+
+#### ***GSM-R to FRMCS System***
+
+GSM-R User B sends a location request to the specific FRMCS User A.
+
+FRMCS User A accepts and returns his location information as requested.
+
+### **12.3.4 Post-condition**
+
+FRMCS User A's location information is sent to GSM-R User B.
+
+GSM-R User B's location information is sent to FRMCS User A.
+
+### **12.3.5 Potential requirements**
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------|
+| [12.3-001] | FRMCS System shall provide a means to obtain and share with FRMCS User the location information of GSM-R User(s). | A | 22.280 | R-6.17.3.1-001 |
+| [12.3-002] | FRMCS System shall provide means to provide location information of FRMCS User to GSM-R. | A | 22.280 | R-6.17.3.1-001 |
+
+## **12.4 Presence interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS Users**
+
+### **12.4.1 Description**
+
+Service interworking of user's presence between GSM-R and FRMCS Systems is not required.
+
+### **12.4.2 Pre-condition**
+
+Void.
+
+### **12.4.3 Service flow**
+
+Void.
+
+### **12.4.4 Post-condition**
+
+Void.
+
+### **12.4.5 Potential requirements**
+
+Void.
+
+## 12.5 Point to Point communication between GSM-R and FRMCS Users
+
+### 12.5.1 Description
+
+This use case allows a FRMCS User to communicate with a GSM-R User, vice versa.
+
+### 12.5.2 Pre-condition
+
+User A is an authorized FRMCS User.
+
+User B is an authorized GSM-R Users.
+
+### 12.5.3 Service flow
+
+#### FRMCS System to GSM-R
+
+FRMCS User A initiates a point to point communication to GSM-R User B.
+
+GSM-R User B accepts the communication and joins the communication.
+
+#### GSM-R to FRMCS System
+
+GSM-R User B initiates a point to point call to FRMCS User A.
+
+FRMCS User A accepts the call and joins the call.
+
+### 12.5.4 Post-condition
+
+GSM-R User B and FRMCS User A are communicating with each other.
+
+### 12.5.5 Potential requirements
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------|
+| [12.5-001] | FRMCS System shall provide a means for point to point communication between an authorized FRMCS User and a GSM-R User, | A | 22.179 | R-6.18.3.5-004 |
+
+FRMCS System
+
+## 12.6 Interworking with legacy systems including LMR
+
+### 12.6.1 Description
+
+This use case describes the way of interworking with legacy systems including LMR.
+
+## 12.6.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The train driver uses the trainborne UE.
+
+Train crews have a LMR UE for each.
+
+The operator at the train control centre has a 3GPP UE.
+
+The train control centre is connected to the public safety centre via 3GPP network.
+
+## 12.6.3 Service flows
+
+The train driver calls the train control centre to report an emergency of the train and wants to share the report with train crews in the train.
+
+The FRMCS System initiates a 3GPP call to the operator at train control centre.
+
+The FRMCS System initiates a LMR call to all of train crews.
+
+The train driver reports the situation. The FRMCS System transmits the report to the train control centre via 3GPP network and to train crews in the train via LMR.
+
+The train control centre received the report and forward the call via 3GPP network to report the situation to the public safety centre.
+
+The train control centre activates the switching device on the railway track to pass other trains via the signal control network.
+
+The train control centre orders the train crews to do a counter-action on the situation.
+
+Train crews are shared with the report and order, and deal with the situation properly.
+
+## 12.6.4 Post-conditions
+
+The situation has been handled.
+
+The train control centre has the information on the situation, the counter-action and its result.
+
+The public safety centre gets the report on the situation in real-time.
+
+## 12.6.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [12.6-001] | The FRMCS System shall provide interworking related functionality between the 3GPP network and the legacy network of LMR, e.g. TETRA and P25. | A/T | 22.179 | The requirement is covered by 6.18.3 Interworking with non-3GPP PTT systems of 22.179 |
+| [12.6-002] | The FRMCS System should provide interworking with the signal control network. | A | 22.280 | This requirement is covered by the combination of functional alias, affiliation mechanism, and IP connectivity. |
+
+## 12.7 Use case: Builds stable positioning framework for FRMCS services and devices including trainborne and handheld devices
+
+### 12.7.1 Description
+
+This use case considers stable positioning framework for FRMCS services and devices are placed in indoor and/or outdoor. The use case focuses covering “GPS shadow area” with ad-hoc positioning technology such as LTE location service.
+
+### 12.7.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The trainborne UE has GNSS function.
+
+The trainborne UE has 3GPP Communication Module.
+
+The train control centre monitors the train traffics.
+
+### 12.7.3 Service flows
+
+The operator at the train control centre requests location information from a train.
+
+The train is running through a very long tunnel, therefore the GNSS in the trainborne UE does not work.
+
+The operator at the train control centre connects the location service in the 3GPP system as an alternative way and obtains the train’s location which is actually the location of the trainborne UE.
+
+The operator at the train control centre determines the train path and controls railway tracks by signalling the track circuit device.
+
+### 12.7.4 Post-conditions
+
+The train control centre obtains the location of the train.
+
+The track circuit for the train is reorganized.
+
+## 12.7.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [12.7-001] | The FRMCS System shall provide the alternative means than GNSS to obtain the position of the FRMCS Equipment. | A | TS 22.280 | The interfacing method and format of the location information from the LTE system is covered by 3GPP specification such as UE positioning in E-UTRAN[5]. Covered by [R-5.11-002a] of TS 22.280 which is “The MCX Service shall be able to provide a mechanism for obtaining high accuracy Location information by integrating position information from multiple external sources (e.g. magnetometers, orientation sensors, GNSS)”. |
+| [12.7-002] | The positioning information shall provide an accuracy of [TBD] whilst the UE is travelling at a maximum of 500 km/h. | A/T | TS 22.261 | TS 22.261 sub-clause 6.27.2
TS 22.261 sub-clause 7.3.2 – refer to positioning service level 3 (only one speed limit supported – up to 500 km/h – with horizontal accuracy of 1m)
See [R-12.14.2-001] of clause 12.14.2.5. |
+
+## 12.8 Interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS
+
+### 12.8.1 Introduction
+
+GSM-R is the widely used wireless communication system of the railways. It provides the bearer service for current critical and supportive railway applications. The deployment of FRMCS and the migration to FRMCS is expected to encompass a large timeframe estimated currently at 10 years. During this period, coexistence and interworking of both communication systems is required. Interworking between the FRMCS System and GSM-R system shall be provided.
+
+Interworking on functional level e.g. numbering plan alignment is not part of this use case.
+
+Note 1: Interworking is the functionality of two networks to talk to each other enabling services to be delivered across the two networks (source: GSMA Document IR.65 "IMS Roaming, Interconnection and Interworking Guidelines").
+
+Note 2: 3GPP MCX specifications have different understandings of Interworking and Interconnection than GSMA and the Railways.
+
+### 12.8.2 Circuit Switched interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS
+
+#### 12.8.2.1 Description
+
+##### Background:
+
+Circuit switched bearer services are used in GSM-R for voice and data communication. That encompasses user-to-user as well as multiuser voice communication.
+
+**Description:**
+
+FRMCS and the GSM-R will coexist for a period estimated currently at 10 years that demands interworking for circuit switched bearer services to cover voice. It requires the necessary circuit switched transport adaptation, the necessary conversion of the signalling and the user data coding among the systems.
+
+**12.8.2.2 Pre-conditions**
+
+GSM-R user is attached to the GSM-R system.
+
+FRMCS Users is attached to the FRMCS System.
+
+**12.8.2.3 Service flows**
+
+GSM-R user establishes a user-to-user voice communication to a FRMCS User.
+
+GSM-R user establishes a multiuser communication including FRMCS Users.
+
+FRMCS User establishes a user-to-user voice communication to a GSM-R user.
+
+FRMCS User establishes a multiuser voice communication including GSM-R users.
+
+**12.8.2.4 Post-conditions**
+
+User-to-user voice communication between GSM-R user and FRMCS User are established.
+
+Multiuser voice communication between GSM-R user and FRMCS Users are established.
+
+**12.8.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis**
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.8.2-001] | FRMCS-system to GSM-R circuit switched signalling and bearer service interworking shall be supported for user-to-user and multiuser voice communication. | A/T | 22.179 | [R-6.18.4.2-003], [R-6.18.4.2-004] |
+| [R-12.8.2-002] | FRMCS System shall support the current voice codecs used by GSM-R. | A/T | 22.179 | [R-6.18.4.2-005] |
+| [R-12.8.2-003] | The FRMCS System shall be able to support interworking of GSM-R MLPP based call priorities to the priority mechanisms of the FRMCS System. | A | 22.179 | [R-6.18.4.2-003] |
+| [R-12.8.2-004] | The FRMCS System shall be able to support interworking between the arbitration scheme used in GSM-R and the arbitration scheme used in the FRMCS System. | A | 22.179 | [R-6.18.4.2-003] |
+
+## 12.8.3 Packet Switched interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS
+
+### 12.8.3.1 Description
+
+Packet switched bearer services i.e. GPRS/EGPRS are used in GSM-R for data communication e.g. ATP. FRMCS and the GSM-R will coexist for a period estimated currently at 10 years that demands an interconnection for packet switched based communication. It requires the necessary packet switched transport adaptation to FRMCS, the conversion of the signalling and the user data coding among the systems.
+
+### 12.8.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+GSM-R user is attached to the GSM-R system.
+
+FRMCS Users are attached to the FRMCS System.
+
+### 12.8.3.3 Service flows
+
+GSM-R user establishes a user-to-user packet switched communication to a FRMCS User.
+
+FRMCS User establishes a user-to-user packet switched communication to a GSM-R user.
+
+### 12.8.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+Packet Switched communication among GSM-R user and FRMCS User are established.
+
+### 12.8.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.8.3-001] | FRMCS-system to GSM-R packet switched interworking shall be supported. | A/T | N/A | According to latest decision from UIC (see FRMCS project activities status report in ERIG#70 (July 2018), the requirement is not required. No use case has been identified by UIC ((E )GPRS EVC could not be connected to any FRMCS RBC). |
+
+## 12.8.4 SMS/SDS interworking between GSM-R and FRMCS
+
+### 12.8.4.1 Description
+
+SMS has been widely used in GSM-R.
+
+FRMCS and GSM-R will coexist for some period. So, interworking between the FRMCS System and Short Message Service in GSM-R is needed.
+
+A possible scenario is that a GSM-R user sends a short message to a FRMCS User to transfer some information.
+
+### 12.8.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+GSM-R user is attached to the GSM-R system.
+
+FRMCS User is attached to the FRMCS system.
+
+#### 12.8.4.3 Service Flows
+
+A GSM-R user sends a short message to a FRMCS User to transfer some information.
+
+#### 12.8.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User can communicate with the GSM-R user.
+
+#### 12.8.4.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------|
+| [R-12.8.4-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to interwork with the Short Message Service in GSM-R. | A | 22.282 | [R-7.2-001] |
+
+### 12.9 Use case: Bearer flexibility
+
+#### 12.9.1 Description
+
+FRMCS envisages bearer flexibility to allow a certain level of independence between Railway Applications and the underlying transport system. FRMCS includes wireless and wireline access. It comprises multiple access systems and shall support various voice and data applications.
+
+The rationale behind these requirements is that the lifecycle of railway applications is in general much longer than the lifecycle of telecommunication access/transport systems. Moreover, bearer flexibility aims at improving service availability and performance.
+
+The characteristics of bearer flexibility are:
+
+1. A Railway Application may use one or several access systems as appropriate.
+2. Connection of FRMCS Equipment to different access systems is dynamic (i.e. the most appropriate 3GPP or non-3GPP access technologies are selected automatically, potentially using multiple access technologies for one or more Railway Applications).
+3. The set of access systems chosen meets the defined QoS and the service requirements e.g. FRMCS User mobility and connectivity which are necessary to guarantee the functionality.
+4. The introduction of a new access system should not negatively impact existing Railway Applications.
+
+The approach taken within FRMCS allows the integration of 3GPP and non-3GPP radio access evolution.
+
+IP is used as a generic interface towards Railway Applications, facilitating connectivity, quality of service control, security and the separation of transport system and applications. NOTE: Non-3GPP access can consist of non-terrestrial e.g. Satellite as well as of terrestrial access systems.
+
+## 12.9.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The Railway Adaptation Sub-System as part of the FRMCS System is embedded between the Railway Applications and the Multi Access Core Network (MACN) and enables the access system independence towards those applications. This Sub-System adapts application characteristics to the access systems. It manages e.g. QoS, address conversion, functional roles and train location information.
+
+The MACN has the ability to manage and interwork with wireless access systems (i.e. 3GPP and non-3GPP) as well as with wireline access systems. It encompasses for example the management of FRMCS User mobility, FRMCS User session/communication handling and control of end-to-end communication prioritisation. The MACN interworks with legacy communication systems and other FRMCS Systems.
+
+The Access Control & Management function of the FRMCS Equipment is able to manage the different access systems as well as access via GSM-R (for roaming and simultaneous operation).
+
+## 12.9.3 Service flows
+
+### Case 1 (data communication)
+
+As an example the Automatic Train Protection (ATP) application of a train establishes a data communication session with the applicable ground communication entity which is connected via the fixed network service. For ATP message exchange, the on-board system can encompass a railway operated private 3GPP 4G access system and a public 3GPP 5G access system (e.g. a VPN service) as part of the FRMCS System. ATP periodically reports train position information and receives Control Command instructions from the ground communication entity. The FRMCS Equipment is registered to both access systems and uses these simultaneously if applicable.
+
+Simultaneous use of radio access systems may improve communication resilience, availability, and QoS and increases bandwidth.
+
+The concept as described here can generally be extended to other data communication applications and (non-)3GPP access systems.
+
+### Case 2 (railway emergency voice communication)
+
+The on-board FRMCS Users are registered to the FRMCS System. An on-board FRMCS User establishes a Railway Emergency Communication (REC) from a specific location in the FRMCS network. This particular communication request takes into account the most appropriate radio access system, for example the railway-operated private 3GPP network. The FRMCS System notifies the applicable users determined by the location of the initiator of the communication by using all available access system(s) e.g. 3GPP (public and private), WLAN or wireline. The applicable Controller is notified via the wireline access system. The intended recipients of the call may be using different access systems.
+
+The concept as described here can in general be extended to other voice group communication applications and point to point communication services.
+
+### Case 3 (telemetry operation at a railway depot)
+
+A train is located in a railway depot where only WLAN coverage (non-3GPP access) as part of the FRMCS System is provided. FRMCS Users of this train are attached to the FRMCS System. An FRMCS User starts a data session towards the applicable vehicle diagnostic entity. At that point in time WLAN provides the radio access system for this telemetry communication. Once the train leaves the depot and enters into a 3GPP coverage area, the FRMCS Equipment adapts the transmission of the telemetry data session to the most QoS effective radio access system (3GPP access). The telemetry session continues uninterrupted when the train changes its location.
+
+The concept as described here can in general be extended to other voice and data applications where other combinations of access systems at specific locations are possible.
+
+### Case 4 (Backup operation/resilience)
+
+In a certain area with dedicated 3GPP access, coverage fails. Despite unavailability of the dedicated railway 3GPP access, FRMCS Users have the capability to continue communications by using public 3GPP access using an access system which may support the required or some degraded form of QoS and which is provided in the area and which serves as a backup or complementary system. Communication applications on trains continue to operate, service continuity is preserved. When the functionality of the dedicated 3GPP access system is restored, the FRMCS Equipment resumes operation on that system.
+
+The concept as described here can generally be extended to any combination of access systems, e.g. WLAN and private 3GPP access.
+
+#### **Case 5 (Notification of radio bearer availability)**
+
+In general, there is only little radio spectrum resources allocated to railways in most regions. These should be preferably used for operational rail communication purposes. In parallel, there are communications that require broadband wireless communication services. The availability of broadband wireless access can be limited e.g. to railway stations. Thus, the FRMCS System is able to take into account radio bearer availability at the FRMCS User's position allowing to start communication such as a file download/upload not harming operational rail communication.
+
+#### **Case 6 (Use of Satellite Communication)**
+
+In some regions, trains are circulating in rural areas, on low traffic lines. For such situation, deploying dedicated rail terrestrial radio access is not economically viable and public mobile operator's service is very limited due to low population density rate. Satellite access is foreseen as an alternative to terrestrial radio access that reduces investment in access infrastructure. In this first approach, satellite access is considered as an enabler to extend communication service of rail lines with FRMCS.
+
+Some rail applications require service continuity for railways operation. In some situation, rail traffic is stopped when communication services are not available. To overcome situations of temporary outage or total destruction of terrestrial access, use of non-terrestrial access systems by the FRMCS system could be envisaged to deliver a highly resilient transport service. In this second approach, satellite access is foreseen as a backup from terrestrial radio access.
+
+It is envisaged that the FRMCS application could be configured with preconditions that trigger an alternate mode of operation.
+
+### **12.9.4 Post-conditions**
+
+#### **Case 1 (data communication)**
+
+The train protected by ATP arrives on time without service interruptions of the communication.
+
+#### **Case 2 (railway emergency voice communication)**
+
+Railway emergency voice communication is established to all FRMCS Users in the designated area independent of the used access network.
+
+#### **Case 3 (telemetry operation at a railway depot)**
+
+Telemetry communication continued while relocating the train/vehicle.
+
+#### **Case 4 (Backup operation/resilience)**
+
+Communication continued when the private 3GPP access is unavailable in an area.
+
+#### **Case 5 (Notification of radio bearer availability)**
+
+none
+
+#### **Case 6 (Use of Satellite Communication)**
+
+Communication continued when the 3GPP terrestrial radio access coverage is physically not provided in an area.
+
+Communication continued when the 3GPP terrestrial radio access is temporarily not available in an area.
+
+
+
+## 12.9.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.9-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to manage 3GPP access systems and non-3GPP access systems (terrestrial and non-terrestrial) simultaneously. | A/T | TS 22.278
TS 22.261 | TS 22.278 sub-clause 5.0
TS 22.261 sub-clause 6.3.2.1 |
+| [R-12.9-002] | If provided by the FRMCS Equipment, the FRMCS Application on the FRMCS Equipment shall be able to make use of 3GPP and non-3GPP access systems simultaneously. | A | TS 22.278
TS 22.261 | TS 22.278 sub-clause 6.2
TS 22.261 sub-clause 6.3.2.1 |
+| [R-12.9-003] | The FRMCS User shall not experience service interruptions in the usage of applications due to a change of an access system. | A | TS 22.278
TS 22.261 | TS 22.278 sub-clause 5.0
TS 22.261 sub-clause 6.2.3
broader functional spectrum |
+| [R-12.9-004] | The FRMCS transport system including 3GPP and non-3GPP access shall be agnostic to Railway Applications. | T | TS 22.278
TS 22.261 | TS 22.278 sub-clause 5.0
TS 22.261 sub-clause 6.2.1/6.2.3
broader functional spectrum |
+| [R-12.9-005] | New access technology shall not require changes for the pre-existing application layer to be able to make use of this new access technology.
Note: Changes are required if the application layer wants to make use of the new capabilities of a new access technology. | A/T | TS 22.261 | TS 22.278 only partially compliant because of missing satellite access support |
+| [R-12.9-006] | The transport layer shall allow using IP as a generic interface. | T | TS 22.278
TS 22.261 | TS 22.278 sub-clause 7.2
TS 22.261 sub-clause 5.1.2.3 |
+| [R-12.9-007] | For recording purposes, the FRMCS System shall be able to provide communication content as well as the associated communication related information. | A | TS 22.280
TS 22.278
TS 22.261 | TS 22.280 sub-clause 6.15.4
TS 22.278 sub-clause 9.2
TS 22.261 sub-clause 8.6 |
+| [R-12.9-008] | The FRMCS System shall be able to make use of one or more of the followings:
3GPP radio access (i.e. 4G and/or 5G) through railway-dedicated licensed spectrum
3GPP radio access (i.e. 4G and/or 5G) provided by public providers
3GPP radio access (e.g. LTE- | T | TS 22.261 | TS 22.278 reduced capabilities; partially encompasses only 4G access |
+
+| | | | | |
+|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| | U) through unlicensed spectrum
Non-3GPP radio access (e.g. IEEE 802.11 based and/or satellite based)
Wireline access
Note 1: GSM-R, TETRA, and P25 are not considered as a radio access technology of FRMCS.
Note 2: Not all of the radio access technologies may support all of the FRMCS requirements. | | | |
+| [R-12.9-009] | The FRMCS System shall consider the availability of radio bearer services at the position of the FRMCS User to allow communication. | A | TS 22.261 | 6.3.2.1: The 5GS shall be able to dynamically offload part of the traffic (e.g. from 3GPP RAT to non-3GPP access technology), taking into account traffic load and traffic type. |
+| [R-12.9-010] | The FRMCS System shall select appropriate radio bearer service with consideration of the FRMCS applications configurable preconditions (e.g. ranking of the available bearer services). | T | TS 22.261 | TS 22.261 sub-clause 6.3.2.1
TS 22.278 reduced capabilities; partially encompasses only 4G access
TS 22.278 sub-clause 7.1.6 |
+| [R-12.9-011] | The FRMCS System shall provide indication to FRMCS application on which bearer service is being used. | T | N/A | Implementation requirement |
+| [R-12.9-012] | Session continuity between 3GPP access and non-3GPP access shall not require FRMCS Users intervention. | T | TS 22.261 | 6.2.3: service continuity
6.3.2.1: The 5GS shall be able to support mobility between the supported access networks |
+
+## 12.10 Use Case: QoS in a railway environment
+
+### 12.10.1 Introduction
+
+This system principle use case provides the framework for Quality of Service within the FRMCS System including the railway applications. The main purpose is to specify the list of attributes applicable to the FRMCS bearer service.
+
+Railway applications exhibit different characteristics, e.g., in terms of latency or reliability. On the other hand, the FRMCS System offers bearer services with different properties.
+
+In this context, two types of applications can be distinguished:
+
+1. Applications that are aware of their transport service requirements and that are able to request those from the FRMCS System.
+2. Applications that are not aware of their transport service requirements and that are therefore not able to request those.
+
+Railway applications require a QoS classification ranging from high to low as low is “best effort”. The most important QoS parameters that determine the quality of the transport system are latency of the user data and reliability of the communication. In addition, guaranteed bandwidth assures the continuation of critical communication.
+
+QoS impacts train punctuality and the entire utilisation of the track system. Therefore, the FRMCS System has to consider the various QoS requirements.
+
+Apart from high train speed operation, which goes up to $500\text{kmh}^{-1}$ , other fundamental factors affect wireless communication. Railways are facing various radio signal propagation conditions such as in free space and in tunnels. Free space encompasses various structural and constructional scenarios. Railway corridors in hilly terrain or forest aisle are some examples.
+
+Radio propagation in large railway stations and shunting yards is different from the one of the main lines. Moving trains in stations or moving cargo wagons in shunting yards cause different propagation conditions.
+
+Radio tower site-to-site distance requires special attention. This distance varies depending on the type of area (rural or urban) and is determined by the boundary conditions of the RF signal (e.g. frequency band and power budget). Railways clearly require to deploy FRMCS while keeping the same distance between the radio towers in order to reuse the infrastructure deployed for GSM-R.
+
+Voice communication is commonly used during rail operation to give instructions to a driver of a locomotive in shunting operation, track maintenance etc. Rail environmental conditions like slowdown or movement of a train can impact the understandability of the voice.
+
+Radio propagation conditions in a rail environment are quite specific. For example train speed up to $500\text{km/h}$ or the insertion loss of the radio signal into a train. Staff has to work in the train, beside a train or under the train etc. while voice communication is ongoing. Such conditions shall not lower the intelligibility of the voice.
+
+Radio spectrum constraints in some regions require high efficiency in terms of radio bandwidth utilisation where voice communication coexists with other communication types simultaneously. The resulting voice codec has to consider these specific conditions.
+
+## 12.10.2 Use case: Quality of Service and railway environment
+
+### 12.10.2.1 Description
+
+The basis for this use case is the UIC FRMCS URS wherein communication attributes define the QoS to be achieved for the various kinds of railway applications. These attributes are not part of the functional use case description but relevant for the FRMCS System and therefore subject of this use case.
+
+Regarding the URS communication attributes, not all attributes are covered in the QoS use case. The following items are considered:
+
+- Type of communication
+- Latency, the delay between action and reaction
+- Session Reliability
+- Setup of communication, the time to establish a voice or data communication session
+- Talker assignment time in group communication
+- Audio (Voice) Quality
+
+For further details, refer to the corresponding use cases in chapters 5 – 9. In these chapters the QoS requirements are specified on functional level. A reference is used which refers to real values' in this QoS use case.
+
+### 12.10.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The pre-conditions of the functional use cases out of chapter 5 – 9 are applicable.
+
+### 12.10.2.3 Service flows
+
+The service flows of the functional use cases out chapter 5 – 9 are applicable.
+
+#### Application categories
+
+Application categories describe the data transfer characteristic to be achieved by a bearer service. The FRMCS System shall consider the following user plane application categories:
+
+**Voice** for user to user or multiuser communication; Voice follows the typical conversational pattern and requires low delay inside the transport system;
+
+**Critical Voice** follows the voice conversational pattern but requires immediate session setup;
+
+**Video** used for general observations purposes, e.g. maintenance;
+
+**Critical Video** with indirect impact on train operation, e.g. passenger surveillance;
+
+**Very Critical Video** with direct impact on safety- related critical train control and operation, e.g. used in driverless ( e.g. GoA3/GoA4) operation for automated detection of objects (no human in the loop) or video-based remote control (human in the loop).
+
+**Very critical data** for future rail applications;
+
+**Critical data** follows the response pattern and requires high reliable transport. This category comprises future and legacy applications e.g. ETCS;
+
+**Non-Critical data** used for the exchange of railway system or communication relevant information; requires high reliable transmission and preservation of the response pattern;
+
+**Messaging** for the exchange of non-critical short information messages, recorded voice (for example voicemail), data, pictures, video; requires reliable transmission;
+
+#### Priority Level
+
+In order to reach the QoS applicable for each application category, transport priority levels are required to differentiate among the communication urgency. Priority handling of communication service encompasses the assignment of a priority to a communication and involves the seizing of resources, which are in use by a communication having a lower ranking in the absence of idle resources. Priority handling includes as well discontinuation of an ongoing communication having a lower priority to allow an incoming communication of higher priority. Priority handling needs to be provided to a FRMCS User for all communications.
+
+Priorities are treated by the FRMCS User/Equipment in the FRMCS System based on the following conditions:
+
+- The priority level depends on the FRMCS User initiating the communication.
+- The communication can have the priority level selected by the FRMCS User at setup or the priority level is predefined at registration. The treatment of priority level also applies when the FRMCS User is registered to a visited FRMCS network.
+- The definition of the priority level which may cause pre-emption of another ongoing communication needs to be stored and can be changed by the FRMCS User.
+- The FRMCS System is able to allocate setup classes i.e. communication setup time requirements and resource pre-emption capabilities to each priority level.
+
+- In case of resource pre-emption, the pre-empted FRMCS user needs to be provided with a suitable indication.
+- The priority level can be selected by the FRMCS User on a per communication basis.
+
+The FRMCS User may select any priority level up to the authorised priority level. The maximum priority level needs to be stored on the UICC. At communication setup, the FRMCS Equipment and the FRMCS System verify the priority level at setup against the maximum authorised priority level. If the FRMCS User has not selected a priority level at setup, the FRMCS System applies a FRMCS User specific default priority level. If the FRMCS User has selected at setup a priority level higher than the maximum authorised priority level, the maximum authorised priority level is applied for the communication.
+
+### Service Attributes
+
+From FRMCS User point of view there are two main service attributes latency and communication reliability.
+
+For the **Latency** two classifications are applicable:
+
+- Low User data delay harms the functioning of the application.
+- Normal User data delay does not harm the sequence and progress of the application.
+
+From FRMCS System point of view, latency quantifies the end-to-end user data transport delay between the involved communication entities.
+
+**Reliability** (in accordance to TS 22.261): in the context of network layer packet transmissions, percentage value of the amount of sent network layer packets successfully delivered to a given system entity within the time constraint required by the targeted service, divided by the total number of sent network layer packets.
+
+Two levels are to be taken into account:
+
+- High The packet loss at transport level is exceptional rare.
+- Normal The packet loss at transport level is seldom.
+
+The FRMCS System is able to assign multiple individual FRMCS User communications having individual QoS profile to a single IP address.
+
+To meet the different application characteristics e.g. conversational pattern, real-time or critical data further itemisation is necessary. The mapping of the service attributes latency and reliability among functional requirements and FRMCS System as well as their target values are summarised in Table 12.10-1.
+
+| Service Attribute | FRMCS - Functional Requirement | FRMCS – System Requirement | Service Attribute value |
+|-------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------------|-------------------------|
+| Latency | Low | Ultra-Low | ≤10ms |
+| | | Low | ≤100ms |
+| | Normal | Normal | ≤500ms |
+| | | Best Effort | >500ms |
+| Reliability | High | Ultra-High | 99.9999% |
+| | | High | 99.9% |
+| | Normal | Normal | 99% |
+
+**Table 12.10-1 - Service attribute mapping**
+
+Some application categories are time stringent e.g. critical voice or critical data.
+
+The range of latency and reliability requirements have a certain dependency on the speed of the trains. In general, the requirement is that the service attributes can be guaranteed up to 500kmh-1. Certain combinations of latency and reliability apply only to **Low Speed** (≤ 40kmh-1).
+
+The applications are considered as real-time when the FRMCS functional requirement for the latency is specified as “Low” and “Ultra Low”, according to table 12.10 1.
+
+### Session handling
+
+**Setup time** of a communication session is essential because of their safety related character. Communication session setup encompasses the value of the elapsed time between the communication establishment request and the indication of successful communication session establishment. The FRMCS User requires two classes:
+
+**Immediate** The FRMCS User requires immediate setup of the communication session. The duration of the immediate communication session establishment shall not exceed 1 second.
+
+**Normal** Normal communication session setup time range does not harm the use of the application. The time duration of the normal communication session establishment shall not exceed 3 seconds.
+
+**Talker assignment time** comprises the timeframe between talker request and the permission to talk applicable to group communication. This timeframe shall be lower than 300ms. Talker assignment time assumes that a group communication has been set up.
+
+**Session Loss Rate (SLR)** indicates the number of sessions released unintentionally per accumulated session time. SLR shall be $<10^{-2}/h$ .
+
+### Communication and QoS assignment
+
+In order to provide the required level of communication quality, the FRMCS System will request the applicable resources as required for the communication service from the underlying 3GPP transport system and if appropriate also from non-3GPP transport systems. The transport resources are characterised by latency, reliability, guaranteed bitrate/non-guaranteed bitrate and communication service priority.
+
+If no specific service attributes are required for a certain communication service, the FRMCS System is able to apply a predefined default.
+
+Each communication service resource characteristic can be requested independently of the others.
+
+As result of the request to the underlying transport system, the FRMCS System may offer different values than the ones requested but which fit to the categories summarised in Table 12.10-1.
+
+The available radio spectrum in certain regions, for example in Europe is rather limited, therefore the FRMCS System might apply different resources for the same communication service in different regions to achieve a radio resource efficient use of the available bandwidth.
+
+### Audio quality
+
+Voice intelligibility strongly depends on the audio bandwidth. FRMCS System has to consider for voice communication following minimum requirements:
+
+- Encoding of speech encompass in minimum the range of 200–7000 Hz;
+- The codec meets the local radio channel and capacity requirements of the FRMCS system;
+- The coding of speech signals is robust to radio impairments sacrificing voice clarity;
+
+#### 12.10.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The post conditions of the functional use cases out of chapter 5 – 9 are applicable.
+
+#### 12.10.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.10.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall be capable of providing different levels of QoS. | (A)T | TS 22.261 | sub-clause 6.7.2 paragraph 1 |
+| [R-12.10.2-002] | The FRMCS-system service attributes shall be allocated unambiguously per application and/or per session and/or per FRMCS User. | (A)T | TS 22.261 | sub-clause 6.7.2 paragraph 1
sub-clause 6.8 paragraph 3, 4 |
+| [R-12.10.2-003] | The FRMCS System shall support the efficient use of the radio resources. | (A)T | TS 22.261 | sub-clause 6.7.2 paragraph 3
sub-clause 6.23.2 |
+| [R-12.10.2-004] | The FRMCS System shall provide service attribute control on a peer to peer basis. | (A)T | TS 22.261 | sub-clause 6.7.2 paragraph 6
sub-clause 6.8 paragraph 3 |
+| [R-12.10.2-005] | The FRMCS System shall provide a mapping between application characteristics and the bearer service attributes. | (A)T | TS 22.261 | sub-clause 6.7.2 paragraph 1 |
+| [R-12.10.2-006] | The FRMCS System shall be able to support different QoS for uplink and downlink of asymmetric bearers. | (A)T | TS 22.261 | sub-clause 6.7.2 paragraph 2 |
+| [R-12.10.2-007] | The FRMCS System shall be able to modify service attributes during an active communication session. | A/T | TS 22.261
TS 22.280 | TS 22.261 sub-clause 6.8 paragraph 1
TS 22.280 sub-clause 6.8 |
+| [R-12.10.2-008] | The FRMCS System shall detect and process the various user data traffic characteristics, latency and session reliability requirements. These requirements are summarised in Table 12.10-2. | (A)T | TS 22.261 | sub-clause 6.8 paragraph 6 |
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.10.2-009] | The FRMCS System shall support the applicable QoS requirements up to a train speed of 500kmh -1 at all locations along the track unless restrictions are indicated which are:
Low speed $\leq 40\text{kmh}^{-1}$ . | T | 22.289 | sub-clause 5.2.2 |
+| [R-12.10.2-010] | To prioritize among the application categories and their related QoS, the FRMCS System shall support 15 priority levels. | T | 22.280 | [R-6.8.7.2-005] |
+| [R-12.10.2-011] | The FRMCS System shall be able to request service attributes (latency, reliability, guaranteed bitrate/ non-guaranteed bitrate and priority) from the underlying 3GPP transport system and if appropriate also from non-3GPP transport systems. | T | TS 22.261 | sub-clause 6.7.2 paragraph 5, 8 |
+| [R-12.10.2-012] | The FRMCS System shall be able to apply predefined default service attributes. | T | TS 22.261 | sub-clause 6.8 paragraph 4-6 |
+| [R-12.10.2-013] | The FRMCS System shall be able to request each communication service attributes independently of the others. | T | TS 22.261 | sub-clause 6.7.2 paragraph 1, 2, 6 |
+| [R-12.10.2-014] | The FRMCS System shall be able to assess whether the communication service attributes received from the transport system are sufficient to support the communication service fully or in a restricted way and report this information to the FRMCS application. | T | TS 22.261 | sub-clause 6.7.2 paragraph 3 |
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.10.2-015] | The FRMCS System shall be able to keep the communication priority independent from the QoS parameters latency, reliability, guaranteed/non-guaranteed bitrate. | T | TS 22.261 | sub-clause 6.7.2 paragraph 4 |
+| [R-12.10.2-016] | The FRMCS System shall provide a radio resource efficient allocation of the communication bandwidth. | T | TS 22.261 | sub-clause 6.7.2 paragraph 3
sub-clause 6.23.2 |
+| [R-12.10.2-017] | Talker assignment time, the timeframe between talker request and the permission to talk in a multi-user voice communication, shall be lower than 300ms. | A/T | 22.179 | [R-6.15.3.2-012] The MCPTT Service shall provide an MCPTT Access time (KPI 1) less than 300 ms for 95% of all MCPTT Request.
[R-6.15.3.2-013] For MCPTT Emergency Group Calls and Imminent Peril Calls the MCPTT Service shall provide an MCPTT Access time (KPI 1) less than 300 ms for 99% of all MCPTT Requests. |
+| [R-12.10.2-018] | FRMCS system shall support at least encoding of speech signals between 200–7000 Hz. | A/T | 22.280
26.441 | TS 22.280
sub-clause 5.13
TS 26.441
entire document |
+| [R-12.10.2-019] | The FRMCS voice codec shall be robust to meet different radio channel impairments caused by the different working conditions in the train, beside or under the train. | A/T | 22.280
26.445 | clause 5
s0504-s0506 |
+| [R-12.10.2-020] | The encoding of speech signals in the FRMCS system shall be efficient to meet limited radio resource availability. | A/T | 22.280
26.445 | clause 5
s0504-s0506 |
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------|
+| [R-12.10.2-021] | Priority handling of communication service in the FRMCS System shall encompass the assignment of a priority to a communication and involves the seizing of resources, which are in use by a communication having a lower ranking in the absence of idle resources. | A/T | 22.280 | [R-6.8.7.2-001] |
+| [R-12.10.2-022] | Priority handling of the FRMCS System shall support discontinuation of an ongoing communication having a lower priority to allow an incoming communication of higher priority. | A/T | 22.280 | [R-6.8.7.2-004] |
+| [R-12.10.2-023] | The FRMCS System shall always consider the priority of the FRMCS User initiating the communication. | A | 22.280 | [R-6.8.7.2-002] |
+| [R-12.10.2-024] | The FRMCS System shall consider for a communication the priority level selected by the FRMCS User at setup or the priority level predefined at registration. | A | 22.280 | [R-6.8.7.2-004] |
+| [R-12.10.2-025] | The FRMCS System shall treat the communication priority levels when the FRMCS User is registered to a FRMCS network. | A | 22.280 | [R-6.8.7.2-001] |
+| [R-12.10.2-026] | The definition of the priority level which may cause pre-emption of another ongoing communication shall be stored and can be changed by the FRMCS User. | A | 22.280 | [R-6.8.7.2-004] |
+| [R-12.10.2-027] | The FRMCS System shall be able to allocate setup classes i.e. communication setup time requirements and resource pre-emption capabilities to each priority level. | A/T | 22.280 | [R-6.8.7.2-003] |
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.10.2-028] | In case of resource pre-emption, the pre-empted FRMCS user shall be provided with a suitable indication. | A | N/A | It is an implementation choice |
+| [R-12.10.2-029] | The priority level shall be selected by the FRMCS User on a per communication basis. | A/T | 22.280 | [R-6.8.7.2-001] |
+| [R-12.10.2-030] | The FRMCS User shall be able to select any priority level up to the authorised priority level. The maximum priority level shall be stored on the UICC. | A | 22.280 | [R-6.8.7.2-006]
[R-6.8.7.2-007] |
+| [R-12.10.2-031] | At communication setup, the FRMCS Equipment/UE and the FRMCS System shall verify the priority level at setup against the maximum authorised priority level. | A | 22.280 | [R-6.8.7.2-008] |
+| [R-12.10.2-032] | If the FRMCS User has not selected a priority level at setup, the FRMCS System shall apply a FRMCS User specific default priority level. | A | 22.280 | [R-6.8.7.2-009] |
+| [R-12.10.2-033] | If the FRMCS User has selected at setup a priority level higher than the maximum authorised priority level, the maximum authorised priority level shall be applied by the FRMCS System for the communication. | A | 22.280 | [R-6.8.7.2-010] |
+| [R-12.10.2-034] | The FRMCS System shall take into account the service attributes to allow selection of the available bearer services. | T | TS 22.261 | sub-clause 6.7.2 paragraph 5, 8 |
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.10.2-035] | The FRMCS System shall be able to assign multiple individual FRMCS User communications having individual QoS profile to a single IP address. | A/T | TS 22.261
TS 22.280 | TS 22.261
sub-clause 6.8 paragraph 3
TS 22.280
sub-clause 5.15 |
+| [R-12.10.2-036] | The FRMCS System shall provide a mechanism to derive the communication characteristics of an application and map those on a data flow with a predefined QoS profile. | A/T | TS 22.261
TS 22.280 | TS 22.261
sub-clause 6.8 paragraph 3
TS 22.280
sub-clause 5.15 |
+
+Application categories and their related service attributes are grouped into specific QoS class. Table 12.10-2 summarises the QoS classes and their applicable service attributes.
+
+| Application Category | Service Attribute (according to Table 12.10-1) | | Session establishment | Session Loss Rate |
+|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|-------------|-----------------------|----------------------|
+| | Latency peer to peer | Reliability | | |
+| Voice | Low | Normal | Normal | NA |
+| Critical Voice | Low | High | Immediate | NA |
+| Video | Normal | High | Normal | NA |
+| Critical Video | Low | High | Immediate | NA |
+| Very Critical Video | Ultra Low or Low Note 1 | High | Normal | NA |
+| Critical Data (future applications) | Low | Ultra-High | Immediate | NA |
+| Very Critical Data | Ultra-Low or Low (Note 1) | Ultra- High | Immediate | NA |
+| Critical Data (legacy applications) | Normal | High | Normal | <10 -2 /h |
+| Non-Critical data | Normal | High | Normal | NA |
+| Messaging | Best Effort | High | Normal | NA |
+
+Note 1: The latency “Ultra low” is restricted to low speed $\leq 40 \text{ kmh}^{-1}$ .
+
+**Table 12.10-2 - Service and Service Attribute requirements**
+
+### Railway specific conditions
+
+1.) Following propagation conditions are to be considered:
+
+- Free space in general
+
+- Railway corridors in general and especially in hilly terrain
+ - Forest Aisle
+ - Underground / tunnel environment
+ - Moving trains or objects in a railway station and shunting yards
+- 2.) FRMCS System should be able to reuse the existing GSM-R sites. A non-exhaustive [example list](#) provides the typical site-to-site deployment scenarios:
+Rural environment: between 5 - 7km.
+Urban environment: <5km.
+
+## 12.11 Use case: Provide broadband and mission critical services with seamless connectivity
+
+### 12.11.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS shall provide the broadband and mission critical services with seamless connectivity.
+
+### 12.11.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The operator at the train control centre has a Railway Emergency Call to a train which is in operation with 500km/h speed via 3GPP network.
+
+Using a trainborne UE, the train driver is discussing an issue on operation of the train with train crews by a video call via a proximity-based services such as ProSe.
+
+### 12.11.3 Service flows
+
+The operator at the train control centre calls the train driver to give an emergency information including broadband video via the 3GPP network of FRMCS System.
+
+The FRMCS System indicates the train driver is currently having a video call which has a normal priority with train crews.
+
+The FRMCS System compares the priority of the Railway Emergency Call and the ongoing call.
+
+Due to the higher priority of the Railway Emergency Call, the FRMCS System puts the ongoing call on hold and the participants receive a notification.
+
+Within 300ms, the train driver is connected to the railway emergency call.
+
+During the Railway Emergency Call, the train driver watches the broadband video as a supplement material to understand the emergency easier.
+
+The train driver recognizes the emergency and does some proper works.
+
+### 12.11.4 Post-conditions
+
+After the Railway Emergency Call is ended, the hold call is resumed.
+
+## 12.11.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.11.5-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to define the priority level of Railway Emergency Call. | A | 22.280 | This requirement is covered by 22.280 [R-5.16.2-002] |
+| [R-12.11.5-002] | The FRMCS System shall be able to handle the priority level of Railway Emergency Call. | A | 22.280 | This requirement is covered by 22.280 [R-5.16.2-002] |
+| [R-12.11.5-003] | The FRMCS System shall support switching between on-network service and off-network service. | A | 22.280 | [This requirement is covered by 22.280 [R-6.18-001] to [R-6.18-006].] |
+| [R-12.11.5-004] | The FRCMS system shall handle a priority call less than 300ms of call setup time in the environment of train speed up to 500km/h. | A | 22.289 | This requirement is covered by section 5.2.2 of 22.289. |
+| [R-12.11.5-005] | The FRMCS System shall be able to present a video included in the Railway Emergency Call. | A | 22.281 | This requirement is covered by 22.281 [R-5.1.9.2.2-001] to [R-5.1.9.2.2-003]. |
+
+## 12.12 Use case: Offer railway services high-quality control functions with real-time train status monitoring
+
+### 12.12.1 Description
+
+The FRMCS System offers high-quality control functions for railway services with real-time train status monitoring.
+
+The train runs on railway by 500km/h of speed. The operator at the train control centre makes request to get the status of the train.
+
+### 12.12.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The train runs on railway by 500km/h of speed.
+
+In the train, there is a trainborne UE and it is connected via 3GPP network.
+
+### 12.12.3 Service flows
+
+The operator at the train control centre makes request to get the status of a train which runs on railway by 500km/h of speed.
+
+The request is made with the train number, rather than the trainborne UE equipment identity.
+
+The request goes through the backbone network and 3GPP network, reaches a trainborne UE.
+
+The trainborne UE gets the train status such as speed and location and records the video monitoring data of the train.
+
+The train status data are encrypted in the security reason by the trainborne UE and is responded back to the train control centre via the 3GPP network.
+
+The trainborne UE requests the moving authority data to the train control system in the train control centre. The moving authority is a permission for a train to move to a specific location with supervision of speed.
+
+The train control system responds the moving authority data to the trainborne UE within a time which is defined in FRMCS QoS.
+
+### 12.12.4 Post-conditions
+
+The train control centre de-crypts the train status data and is able to see the status of the train including the streaming video of monitoring.
+
+The train receives the moving authority data and references the data.
+
+### 12.12.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.12-001] | The FRMCS System shall provide a mapping between FRMCS Equipment Identity and the train number. | A | 22.280 | This requirement is covered by [R-5.9a-018] of 22.280 |
+| [R-12.12-002] | The FRMCS System shall be able to maintain a secure data channel for the train status monitoring communication. | A | 22.280 | This requirement is covered by [R-5.12-001] and [R-5.12-009] of 22.280 |
+| [R-12.12-003] | The FRMCS should be able to define a minimum bandwidth of video monitoring. | A | 22.289 | This requirement is covered by section 5.2.2 of 22.289 |
+| [R-12.12-004] | The FRMCS should be able to define a minimum delay time of communicating the train status monitoring. | A | 22.289 | This requirement is covered by section 5.2.2 of 22.289 |
+| [R-12.12-005] | The FRMCS should be able to define a minimum delay time of communicating the moving authority data. | A | 22.289 | This requirement is covered by section 5.2.2 of 22.289. |
+
+## 12.13 Use case: Provide call priority during interworking with LMR
+
+### 12.13.1 Description
+
+There are Mission Critical Services such as Railway, use many kinds of communication technology, e.g. TRS and LTE. To make interworking between the networks to during provide FRMCS communication, it needs to manage call priority between calls which are made between the networks.
+
+During the interworking between FRMCS and LMR systems including TETRA and P25, FRMCS provides call priority based on factors such as the situation, group priority, level of user, etc. For example, a Railway Emergency Call could be categorized as a public announcement on emergency (low-level priority) or an operation emergency call (high-level priority).
+
+Examples on the priority of calls in FRMCS are provided in the following table:
+
+**Table 12.13-1: Priority of calls in FRMCS**
+
+| Call Type | Priority | Related Action |
+|--------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Operation Emergency Call | 0 | Stop all the calls have priority lower than or equal to Control Safety Announcement |
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| | (the highest) | |
+| Control Safety Announcement (between Operation Users) | 1 | Stop all the calls have priority lower than or equal to Public Announcement on Emergency |
+| Public Announcement on Emergency | 2 | Stop all the calls have priority lower than or equal to Operation Call |
+| Operation Call (not emergency case) | 3 | Stop all the calls have priority lower than or equal to Service Information Announcement |
+| Service Information Announcement | 4 | - |
+
+The examples in the table 12.13-1 are made by modifying of the call priority of the railway communication system as a mission critical service [4].
+
+If an operation emergency call is invoked by a user (maybe a train driver), it should have higher level of priority than the public announcement on emergency call of other user. In this case, all the lower priority calls may need to be pre-empted or queued to allow the operation emergency call.
+
+In order to provide the call priority, the interworking needs to be able to maintain the information on the priority of each call and each user who invoked a call or a group call. When a call is invoked, FRMCS should compare the priority between the current call and the new call and decide which one is allowed to go through.
+
+## 12.13.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The operator at the train control centre has a Railway Emergency Call to a train which is in operation with 500km/h speed via 3GPP network.
+
+Using a trainborne UE, the train driver has an announcement of control safety to the train crews via LMR such as TRS.
+
+## 12.13.3 Service flows
+
+The operator at the train control centre calls the train driver and the train crews to give an emergency notice via the 3GPP network of FRMCS System.
+
+The FRMCS System indicates the train driver and the train crews are currently having a group call which has a lower priority then the emergency notice call.
+
+The FRMCS System queues the ongoing TRS call and connects the train control centre and the trainborne UE.
+
+The emergency notice call from the train control centre via the 3GPP network, is relayed to TRS to make announce to the train driver and the train crews.
+
+The train driver and the train crews recognize the emergency and do some proper works.
+
+## 12.13.4 Post-conditions
+
+After the emergency notice call is ended, the queued TRS call is resumed.
+
+### 12.13.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.13-001] | FRMCS should be able to handle call priority when interworking with LMR communication systems. | A | 22.179
22.280 | This requirement is covered by 22.179 [R-6.18.3.2-006] to [R-6.18.3.2-009] and 22.179 [R-6.18.3.3-006] to [R-6.18.3.3-007].
The high level requirements of handling call priority are covered by many sections of 22.280, e.g. section 5.1.7 and 5.6.
TETRA and P25 may need considerations as follows:
- a. TETRA may provide some customizable features to maintain the call priority such as Call ownership and Call priority.
- b. P25 has no features to support the call priority.
- c. FRMCS has many basic information to handle the call priority such as 'Priority of the user for initiating/receiving calls' in the user profile data and 'Priority of the group' in the group configuration data.]
|
+| [R-12.13-002] | The FRMCS System should be able to define a maximum call setup time for a call between 3GPP system and LMR system. | A | 22.289 | This requirement is covered by section 5.2.3 of 22.289 |
+| [R-12.13-003] | FRMCS should provide the call priority supporting features to interworking with LMR. | A | 22.179
22.280 | This requirement is covered by 22.179 [R-6.18.3.2-006] to [R-6.18.3.2-009] and 22.179 [R-6.18.3.3-006] to [R-6.18.3.3-007].
The high level requirements of handling call priority are covered by many sections of 22.280, e.g. section 5.1.7 and 5.6.
|
+| [R-12.13-004] | FRMCS should provide interworking between FRMCS System and LMR system. | A | 22.179 | covered by 22.179 [R-6.18.3.2-001] and [R-6.18.3.3-001] |
+
+## 12.14 Use Case: FRMCS Positioning Accuracy
+
+### 12.14.1 Introduction
+
+This system principle use case describes the positioning accuracy requirements to position a train, track side worker as well as other stationary and non-stationary object inside the track system. In general, positioning accuracy will become a major building block to increase the automation level of train operation. The main purpose is to specify the accuracy parameter values.
+
+### 12.14.2 Use case: FRMCS Positioning Accuracy
+
+#### 12.14.2.1 Description
+
+Today fixed mounted balise are used to derive the train position inside the track-system. This kind of train positioning is precise enough when the train is moving. Static conditions like in stations, push-pull train operation or the frequent change between static and dynamic conditions during shunting operation require hundreds of fixed mounted balise. Thus, a balise without stationary reference shall overcome this circumstance.
+
+According to Figure 12.14-1, individual coaches, trains, track side worker get equipped which such devices that report continuously the process status towards the applicable control centre enriched with the actual position information.
+
+
+
+Figure 12.14-1: Positioning application areas. The diagram shows a track layout with multiple parallel tracks. On the top track, there are two yellow maintenance vehicles. Below them, a train consisting of five blue rectangular coaches is shown. The first coach has a green light on its left side, and the last coach has a red light on its right side. Below the train, another track shows a single blue coach with a green light on its left side. At the bottom, a track side worker wearing a yellow safety vest and holding a green flag is standing on a track. The tracks are divided into segments by vertical lines, and some segments are highlighted with pink or green background colors. The entire diagram is enclosed in a perspective view frame.
+
+**Figure 12.14-1 Positioning application areas**
+
+Tracks/lines or shunting areas are subdivided into autonomous hazard areas (red blocks see Figure 12.14-1). The continuous processing of positioning information allows the control centre to detect when hazard areas start to overlap. Based on the computed risk integral, the control centre is able to instruct the vehicles or trains in the concerned area to lower the speed up to a full stop.
+
+To guarantee fail-safe operation in deriving the position of the vehicle, track-side worker etc., and independent positioning sources need to be provided. Beside inertial navigation, GNSS and others, the FRMCS System is required to be part of the positioning data acquisition process. This results from rather low predictable availability of satellite
+
+systems especially in mountain regions, multilevel railway station as well as in tunnels. In the worst case, “rough” positioning information only derived from the FRMCS – Land Mobile Network is present.
+
+The combination of 3GPP radio access network and the train on-board system is able to support mechanisms that can be used to locate an entire train, stationary as well as non-stationary objects. Together with the positioning information of other sources (see Figure 12.14-2) e.g. inertial navigation and GNSS, consolidated positioning information of the train/object will be computed that is able to fulfil higher accuracy of the positioning information. Train Onboard system as well as FRMCS location information system will receive the consolidated location positioning information for further processing by the train safety applications and/or FRMCS location information system.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the flow of positioning information. At the top, a grey rounded rectangle is labeled 'User' with a white rectangular box next to it. Below this is a long grey rounded rectangle labeled 'Train'. Inside the 'Train' rectangle, there are four separate white rectangular boxes arranged horizontally, each containing placeholder text. Upward-pointing arrows connect each of these four boxes to the 'User' box. Below the 'Train' rectangle is another long grey rounded rectangle labeled 'Ground', which also contains placeholder text. A small grey square is positioned between the 'Train' and 'Ground' rectangles.
+
+Figure 12.14-2: Consolidation of positioning source information. The diagram shows a 'User' block at the top, a 'Train' block in the middle, and a 'Ground' block at the bottom. The 'Train' block contains four sub-blocks representing different FRMCS users. Arrows point from each of these four sub-blocks up to the 'User' block, indicating the consolidation of positioning information.
+
+**Figure 12.14-2 Consolidation of positioning source information**
+
+The subject described is applicable to other FRMCS functional use cases. The resulting positioning requirements in this use case are relevant for the FRMCS System.
+
+### 12.14.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+Railway line consist of station A, B and C. Station B is between station A and C.
+
+FRMCS User 1 is used by an InterRegio train that stops in station A, B and C.
+
+FRMCS User 2 is used by a high speed train that stops in station A and station C.
+
+FRMCS User 3 is used on a parked train in station B.
+
+FRMCS User 4 is used by mobile warning equipment located in station B.
+
+Ground FRMCS User processes the received positioning information of the different train FRMCS Users for safety purposes.
+
+FRMCS Users on the train (safety application) established the communication to the ground FRMCS User (safety application) that is responsible for train safety purposes on the line between the stations A and C including station B.
+
+Base stations are covering the line between station A and station C. The structure of the base station along the line is linear. In some cases dual base stations per site can be used. The distance between adjacent base stations varies between 1 and 10km.
+
+Train speed profile ranges between 0 - 500km/h.
+
+The base stations covering the line between station A and C are enhanced cellular base stations that are able to form a carrier grade positioning network.
+
+### 12.14.2.3 Service flows
+
+Train FRMCS User 1 (safety application) as part of the InterRegio train approaches station B coming from station A.
+
+Train FRMCS User 2 (safety application) as part of a high speed train passes station B coming from station C.
+
+Train FRMCS User 3 (safety application) as part of the parked train in station B that continuous later.
+
+Train FRMCS User as part of a mobile warning system protects a line section that is under construction.
+
+All train FRMCS Users (safety application) periodically report their current position to the ground FRMCS User (safety application).
+
+### 12.14.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+Every train approached his final destination.
+
+No harm to the ongoing construction work in station B.
+
+## 12.14.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.14.2-001] | The consolidated positioning information i.e. the location information resulting from the combination of all positioning sources available to the FRMCS System shall support following absolute positioning accuracy based on the train speed at of the occasions:
0 - 40km/h Longitudinal: m
lateral: 1 - 3 m
Up to 120km/h
Longitudinal: m lateral: 1 - 3 m
Up to 160km/h
Longitudinal: m lateral: 1 - 3 m
Up to 320km/h
Longitudinal: m lateral: 1 - 3 m
Up to 500km/h
Longitudinal: m lateral: 1 - 3 m
See [9]
| A/T | TS 22.261 | TS 22.261 sub-clause 6.27.2
TS 22.261 sub-clause 7.3.2 – refer to positioning service level 3 (only one speed limit supported – up to 500 km/h – with horizontal accuracy of 1m)
TS 22.278 does not consider this requirement.
|
+| [R-12.14.2-002] | FRMCS System shall be able to support an initial positioning fix time of $\leq 5$ s. | A/T | TS 22.261 | TS 22.261 sub-clause 7.3.2
TS 22.278 does not consider this requirement.
|
+| [R-12.14.2-003] | To avoid large offsets between adjacent hazard areas due to limited track space in a railway station, FRMCS System shall be able to support a sampling interval between two positioning cycles of $< 1$ s. | A/T | Not covered | TS 22.261
TS 22.261 sub-clause 7.3.2 (Positioning service latency = 1 s)
TS 22.278 does not consider this requirement.
|
+| [R-12.14.2-004] | FRMCS Equipment power consumption due to the use of positioning capabilities shall be minimised. | A/T | TS 22.261 | TS 22.261 sub-clause 6.27.2 and 7.3.2.3 (location power saving mode with restriction in update rate)
TS 22.278 does not consider this requirement.
|
+
+## 12.15 Use Case: FRMCS System security framework
+
+### 12.15.1 Introduction
+
+The security framework protects the FRMCS System against attacks and threats, like misuse, Denial of Service (DoS), unauthorized access to services, interception, man-in-the-middle attacks, replay attacks and intended data modification. It encompasses the protection of security attributes confidentiality, privacy, integrity, availability and non-reputation.
+
+## 12.15.2 Use case: FRMCS System security framework
+
+### 12.15.2.1 Description
+
+The security framework protects:
+
+- Services provided by the FRMCS System;
+- Bearer flexible access including 3GPP as well as non-3GPP access;
+- Direct interaction between FRMCS Equipment;
+- Interaction between the FRMCS end user devices and FRMCS network;
+- Interaction between FRMCS network functions;
+- Stored data within the FRMCS System;
+- Interworking between a FRMCS System and another FRMCS System;
+- Interworking between a FRMCS System and a legacy system.
+
+### 12.15.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+FRMCS System is in use.
+
+### 12.15.2.3 Service flows
+
+FRMCS System security framework related service flows cover the following aspects:
+
+- identity management;
+- authentication;
+- authorization;
+- key management;
+- data protection (regarding integrity, confidentiality, privacy, non-reputation);
+- prevention of attacks;
+- detection of attacks;
+- reaction on detected attacks.
+
+### 12.15.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The FRMCS System is protected.
+
+### 12.15.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.15.2-001] | The FRMCS System security framework shall enable the use of unique identities. | A | TS 22.228
TS 22.280 | A- TS 22.228 sub-clause 7.5.1
A- TS 22.280 [R-5.12-002] |
+| [R-12.15.2-002] | The FRMCS System security framework shall allow the grouping of identities. | A | TS 22.228
TS 22.280 | A- TS 22.228 sub-clause 7.5.1
A- TS 22.280 sub-clause 5.1.3, 5.12 |
+| [R-12.15.2-003] | The FRMCS System security framework shall provide mechanisms to authenticate a unique identity. | A/T | TS 22.278
TS 22.261
TS 22.228
TS 22.280 | T- TS 22.278 sub-clause 9.2
T- TS 22.261 sub-clause 8.3
A- TS 22.228 sub-clause 11.2, H 2.3, H 3.3, H 4.3
A- TS 22.280 sub-clause 5.12 |
+| [R-12.15.2-004] | The FRMCS System security framework shall provide authentication mechanisms required for the secured interaction between FRMCS network functions. | A/T | N/A | Implementation requirement |
+| [R-12.15.2-005] | The FRMCS System security framework shall provide mechanisms to authorise communications and the use of applications. | A | TS 22.280
TS 22.228 | sub-clauses:5.9a2, 5.12, 5.16, 5.19, 6.4.2, 6.4.5, 6.4.6, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.13, 6.19.1
TS 22.228: sub-clause 5 |
+| [R-12.15.2-006] | The FRMCS System security framework shall provide a management of identities, passwords and keys required for the protection of FRMCS User communication, the interaction between FRMCS network functions as well as subscribers and service related data. | A/T | TS 22.261
TS 22.280 | TS 22.261: Identity management (see section 8.5)
TS 22.280: Key management, profile management (see section 5.12)
Password management is an implementation requirement. |
+| [R-12.15.2-007] | The FRMCS System security framework shall be able to block the use of any FRMCS Equipment when it is detected as being stolen or lost. | A/T | TS 22.261
TS 22.280 | T TS 22.261 sub-clause 8.7
A TS 22.280 sub-clause 6.13.4 |
+| [R-12.15.2-008] | The FRMCS System security framework shall be able to unblock the use any recovered stolen or lost FRMCS Equipment. | A/T | TS 22.278
TS 22.261
TS 22.280 | T TS 22.261 sub-clause 8.7
A TS 22.280 sub-clause 6.13.4 |
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.15.2-009] | The FRMCS System security framework shall protect the services provided by the FRMCS System; bearer flexible access including 3GPP as well as non-3GPP access; interaction between the FRMCS end user devices and FRMCS network; interaction between FRMCS network functions; stored data within the FRMCS System; interworking between a FRMCS System and another FRMCS System; Interworking between a FRMCS System and a legacy system. | A/T | TS 22.261
TS 22.280 | TS 22.261 sub-clause 8.2
TS 22.280: [R-6.13.6-001] |
+| [R-12.15.2-010] | The FRMCS System security framework shall prevent software based attacks which have an impact on any of the following security attributes:
data confidentiality;
information privacy;
data integrity;
non-repudiation of data;
FRMCS System availability. | T | N/A | Implementation requirement |
+| [R-12.15.2-011] | The FRMCS System security framework shall be able to detect software based attacks which have an impact on any of the following security attributes:
data confidentiality;
information privacy;
data integrity;
non-repudiation of data transfer;
FRMCS System availability. | T | N/A | Implementation requirement |
+| [R-12.15.2-012] | The FRMCS System security framework shall be able to react on detected software based attacks: which have an impact on any of the following security attributes:
data confidentiality;
information privacy;
data integrity;
non-repudiation of data transfer;
FRMCS System availability. | T | N/A | Implementation requirement |
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------|
+| [R-12.15.2-013] | The FRMCS System security framework shall provide procedures and mechanisms for management of FRMCS System security. | T | N/A | Implementation requirement |
+| [R-12.15.2-014] | The FRMCS System security framework shall be able to track users' actions such as usage of communication services, management operations, configuration changes etc. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 sub-clause 6.15.4 |
+| [R-12.15.2-015] | The FRMCS System security framework shall be able to store security related data for post-analysis, e.g. forensic. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 sub-clause 6.15.4 |
+
+## 12.16 Use Case: Interworking to external networks
+
+### 12.16.1 Introduction
+
+This section describes the general interworking between FRMCS System, based on 3GPP transport and external communication/data networks.
+
+### 12.16.2 Use case: FRMCS System external network interworking
+
+#### 12.16.2.1 Description
+
+Apart from the communication facilities within one FRMCS network, FRMCS User(s) require as well communication facilities to and from other external networks. Thus an FRMCS System has to provide various communication facilities between FRMCS User(s) and external network user(s).
+
+The term “user” is hereby meant as either an individual or an application.
+
+The necessary interworking to external networks is able to provide incoming and outgoing voice- and data bearer services.
+
+The following are considered as external networks:
+
+- Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN)
+- Private Telephone Network
+- Private Mobile Radio (PMR) or Land Mobile Radio (LMR): refer to section 12.6 for additional use cases to interworking between FRMCS and LMR.
+- Public Land Mobile network (PLMN)
+- Other GSM-R networks: refer to section 12.8 for additional use cases to interworking between FMCS and GSM-R.
+- Other FRMCS networks
+- Other Wireless Access
+
+- Other packet data networks, e.g. Internet.
+
+### 12.16.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User is attached to the FRMCS System.
+
+The external network user is attached to the external network.
+
+Authentication and authorization of the FRMCS User(s) and communications initiated by the FRMCS Users are managed within the FRMCS System.
+
+The required Quality of Service is managed by the FRMCS System.
+
+### 12.16.2.3 Service flows
+
+#### **Case 1 (Communication is to be established from FRMCS system towards an external network)**
+
+An entitled FRMCS User enters a destination address for establishment of a communication session. The destination address can be of the following formats:
+
+- E.164 address
+- Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) (e.g. SIP address, URL, e-mail address...)
+- EIRENE functional number
+- FRMCS Functional Identity
+- FRMCS User Identity
+- FRMCS subscriber identity
+
+Based on the destination address, the FRMCS System performs the following:
+
+- Detects the correct bearer type including characteristics
+- Translates the destination address to a routable format
+- Analyses if the destination is external to FRMCS System
+- Selects an available interconnection for the bearer type. (Interconnection selection can be either a direct or indirect connection, e.g. gateway)
+- Attempts to setup the communication session
+
+#### **Case 2 (Communication is to be established from an external network towards FRMCS system)**
+
+An external network user tries to establish a communication session towards an FRMCS User. The destination address can be of the following formats, depending of the capabilities of the external network:
+
+- E.164 address
+- Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) (e.g. SIP address, URL, e-mail address...)
+- FRMCS Functional Identity (other FRMCS networks)
+- FRMCS User Identity (other FRMCS networks)
+- FRMCS subscriber identity (other FRMCS networks)
+
+Based on the destination address, the FRMCS System does the following:
+
+- Locates user(s) within the FRMCS System to detect possible roaming case
+- Translates the destination address into a routable format
+- Detects the correct bearer characteristics
+- Establishes the communication session.
+
+#### 12.16.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+##### **Case1**
+
+An FRMCS User is able to establish voice and/or data communication with intended user(s) in an external network.
+
+##### **Case2**
+
+An external network user is able to establish voice and/or data communication with intended user(s) managed by the FRMCS System.
+
+## 12.16.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.16.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall provide means of regulated interworking (s) for telephony services to/from external public networks e.g. system administrator has the ability to restrict access telephony services to/from external networks. | T | Covered by TS 22.179
TS 22.280 | For GSM-R, covered in 22.179 [R-6.18.4.2-001-5].
For other MCX systems, covered in 22.280 [R-6.17.2-001-7]
For LMR/PMR (e.g. TETRA, P25 and TIA-603-D refer to section 12.6.
For PLMN and PSTN, covered by 22.280 [R-6.17.3.2-002] |
+| [R-12.16.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall provide Packet switched (PS) interworking (s) to/from external networks. | T | Partly covered by TS 22.280 | For GSM-R and according to latest decision from UIC (see FRMCS project activities status report in ERIG#70 (July 2018), the requirement is not required. No use case has been identified by UIC ((E )GPRS EVC could not be connected to any FRMCS RBC).
For other MCX systems, covered in 22.280 [R-6.17.2-001-7].
For LMR/PMR (e.g. TETRA, P25 and TIA-603-D refer to section 12.6.
For PLMN and PSTN, interworking is not covered. |
+| [R-12.16.2-003] | The FRMCS System shall provide the necessary signalling and voice codec adaptation in the context of interworking with external networks. | T | Partly covered by TS 22.179 | For GSM-R covered in 22.179 [R-6.18.4.2-005] For other MCX systems, not required.
For LMR/PMR (e.g. TETRA, P25 and TIA-603-D refer to section 12.6.
For PLMN and PSTN, interworking is not covered |
+| [R-12.16.2-004] | The FRMCS System shall provide interworking for supplementary services related to the external network. | A | Not covered. | For other MCX systems, not applicable (other mechanisms are provided).
For LMR/PMR (e.g. TETRA, P25 and TIA-603-D refer to section 12.6.
For other external systems, not covered. |
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.16.2-005] | The FRMCS System shall provide interworking communication with external networks in a secured way. | A/T | Partly covered by TS 22.280 | For other MCX systems covered in 22.280 [R-6.17.2-001], [R-6.17.2-002], [R-6.17.2-007].
For LMR/PMR (e.g. TETRA, P25 and TIA-603-D) refer to section 12.6.
For PLMN and PSTN, interworking is not covered.
For other external systems, not covered. |
+| [R-12.16.2-006] | The FRMCS System shall provide interworking communication with external networks with the required Quality of Service. | T | Partly covered by TS 22.280 | For other MCX systems, not covered.
For GSM-R, covered by [R-6.17.3.1-002].
For LMR/PMR (e.g. TETRA, P25 and TIA-603-D) refer to section 12.6.
For PLMN and PSTN, interworking is not covered. |
+| [R-12.16.2-007] | The FRMCS System shall be able to select interconnection based on multiple interconnections of the same type (i.e. redundancy of physical/logical paths and transmission links for both control and user planes including load aggregation and/or warm stand-by techniques). | A/T | N/A (physical paths)
TS 22.280 | Implementation requirement for redundant physical paths.
Partly covered by clause 6.17.3.1 for GSM-R.
Load aggregation and/or warm stand-by techniques to be supported by the Interworking Function (IWF). |
+| [R-12.16.2-008] | The FRMCS System shall select the bearer characteristics based on exchanged signalling information (i.e. dynamic and automatic configuration of interconnections parameters). | T | TS 22.280 | Partly covered by clause 6.17.3.1 for GSM-R.
Dynamic and automatic configuration of interconnections parameters to be supported by the Interworking Function (IWF). |
+| [R-12.16.2-009] | The FRMCS System shall select the appropriate interconnection type, e.g. CS or PS based on the destination address of the target user. | T | N/A | For GSM-R, PS interworking is not required (see above). |
+
+## 12.17 Use Case: FRMCS On-network/Off-network communication
+
+### 12.17.1 Introduction
+
+Typical communication will involve the transport capabilities of the FRMCS network but some of the FRMCS communication scenarios require the use of Off-network bearer services. Also a combination of On-network and Off-
+
+network bearer services can increase the entire availability of the entire FRMCS transport system which is essential for railways especially in Automated Train Operation.
+
+This results into three global FRMCS communications modes:
+
+- On-network only communication
+- Off-network only communication
+- Combined On-network and Off-network communication.
+
+Note: The different types of communication use cases related to On-network and/or Off-network are summarised in Annex C.
+
+## 12.17.2 Use case: On-network/Off-network communication
+
+### 12.17.2.1 Description
+
+**On-network** only communication mode uses the bearer services that are provided by the FRMCS land mobile network. It relies on the flexible use of 3GPP and non 3GPP bearer services and allows user to user as well as multi-user communication.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the on-network communication mode. On the left, a white circle with a thick black outline represents the Mobile FRMCS User (onboard). On the right, a solid black square represents the Ground FRMCS User (controller). A solid black arrow points from the mobile user to the ground user, indicating the direction of communication.
+
+Diagram of FRMCS On-network communication mode showing a Mobile FRMCS User (onboard) communicating with a Ground FRMCS User (controller).
+
+**Figure 12.17-1 FRMCS On-network communication mode**
+
+On-network communication is used for Mobile FRMCS User (onboard) to Ground FRMCS User (controller) communication.
+
+**Off-network** only communication mode uses a dedicated radio bearer service for proximity communication which is supported by FRMCS Equipment. It relies on an appropriate 3GPP bearer service that allows user to user as well as multi-user communication without direct involvement of FRMCS land mobile network. A relay function in Off-network communication mode can extend the range of the communication facilities. FRMCS Equipment may bridge a distance for proximity communications of up to 3km.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the off-network communication mode. On the left, two solid black circles represent Mobile FRMCS Users (onboard). On the right, a solid black circle with a crosshair symbol represents the Ground FRMCS User (controller). Dashed arrows point from each mobile user to the ground user, indicating the direction of communication. A solid arrow points from the ground user to a third solid black circle on the far right, representing another mobile user or equipment.
+
+Diagram of FRMCS Off-network communication mode showing two Mobile FRMCS Users (onboard) communicating via a Ground FRMCS User (controller).
+
+**Figure 12.17-2: FRMCS Off-network communication mode**
+
+Off-network communication can be used for e.g. shunting or banking communication where not always a ground FRMCS User i.e. controller is necessary. Off-network communication provides also the backup if On-network communication is unavailable.
+
+**Combined On-and Off-network** communication mode encompasses the parallel use of the FRMCS land mobile network and the radio bearer service for proximity communication. There are various sub-categories for this communication mode:
+
+**Relay mode 1:** A FRMCS Equipment uses On-network and Off-network communication and constitutes an On- and Off-network relay function to other FRMCS Equipment's that are in Off-network only communication mode.
+
+
+
+Diagram of FRMCS Off-network communication mode. Two black circles on the left have dashed arrows pointing to a central circle with a black center. This central circle has a solid arrow pointing to a black square on the right.
+
+**Figure 12.17-3: FRMCS On-network and Off-network communication mode - Relay mode 1**
+
+On-network and off network communication mode relay mode 1 bridge over the coupling loss for FRMCS Users in a train that do not have access to the roof antenna. Hence, relay mode 1 helps to overcome radio link issues in a train.
+
+**Relay mode 2:** FRMCS equipment encompasses On-network and Off-network communication that enables Off-network bearer service for an Off-network only communication relay function.
+
+
+
+Diagram of FRMCS On-network and Off-network communication mode - Relay mode 1. Two black circles on the left have dashed arrows pointing to a central circle with a cross inside. This central circle has a dashed arrow pointing to a circle with a black center. This circle has a solid arrow pointing to a black square on the right.
+
+**Figure 12.17- 4: FRMCS On-network/Off-network communication mode - Relay mode 2**
+
+Relay mode 2 is an extension of relay mode 1 that allows e.g. the concatenation of maintenance teams during tunnel maintenance activities.
+
+**Relay mode 3:** FRMCS Equipment encompasses On-network and Off-network communication. Each FRMCS Equipment is able to constitute an On-network and Off-network relay function. Interworking between one and several of such relay functions allows the use of multipath transport facilities for communication purposes.
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating FRMCS On-network-and Off-network communication mode - Relay mode 3. It shows three nodes: a top node (circle with a dot), a bottom-left node (circle with a dot), and a bottom-right node (solid black square). The top node has a dashed double-headed arrow to the bottom-left node and a solid double-headed arrow to the bottom-right node. The bottom-left node has a solid double-headed arrow to the bottom-right node.
+
+**Figure 12.17-5: FRMCS On-network-and Off-network communication mode - Relay mode 3**
+
+Relay mode 3 allows multipath transport facilities for FRMCS Applications that require extreme high communication reliability e.g. control command signaling applications like ATP.
+
+## 12.17.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+### On-network only communication
+
+FRMCS Equipment is authorised to use On-network communication mode.
+
+FRMCS Users are attached to the FRMCS System and is authorised to establish user to user and/or multi-user communication.
+
+### Off-network only communication
+
+FRMCS Equipment is authorised to use Off-network only communication mode. Some of the FRMCS Equipment's are authorised to establish an Off-network communication relay function.
+
+The FRMCS Users are authorised to establish user to user and/or multi-user communication.
+
+### Combined On-network-and Off-network communication
+
+The FRMCS Users are authorised to establish user to user and/or multi-user communication.
+
+#### Relay Mode 1
+
+The FRMCS Equipment that supports in On-network/Off-network relay communication mode is authorised to establish Off-network communication to other FRMCS Equipment's which are in Off-network only communication mode.
+
+#### Relay Mode 2
+
+FRMCS Equipment that supports Off-network relay communication mode is authorised to establish a communication to other FRMCS Equipment's that are in Off-network communication mode. FRMCS Equipment that is in Off-network relay communication mode is authorised to establish an Off-network communication to an On-network and Off-network relay communication mode FRMCS Equipment.
+
+### **Relay Mode 3**
+
+FRMCS Equipment's in On-network and Off-network communication mode are authorised to establish On- and Off-network communications.
+
+## **12.17.2.3 Service flows**
+
+FRMCS Users are involved in the different types of communication modes establishes user to user and/or multi-user communications.
+
+### **On-network only communication**
+
+The FRMCS equipment establishes On-network only communication.
+
+### **Off-network only communication**
+
+The FRMCS Equipment in Off-network relay communication mode and the FRMCS Equipment's in Off-network communication mode establish the Off-network communication.
+
+### **Combined On-network-and Off-network communication**
+
+#### **Relay Mode 1**
+
+The FRMCS Equipment in On-network/Off-network communication mode establishes:
+
+- an On-network communication
+- Off-network communication to FRMCS Equipment's in Off-network only communication mode
+
+#### **Relay Mode 2**
+
+The FRMCS Equipment in On-network and Off-network communication mode establishes:
+
+- an On-network communication
+- Off-network communication to a FRMCS Equipment in Off-network relay communication mode
+
+The FRMCS equipment in Off-network relay communication mode establishes Off-network communication to FRMCS equipment's in Off-network only communication mode.
+
+#### **Relay Mode 3**
+
+The FRMCS equipment's in On-network and Off-network communication mode establishes:
+
+- an On-network communication
+- Off-network communication to a FRMCS Equipment in On-network-and Off-network relay communication mode.
+
+## **12.17.2.4 Post-conditions**
+
+### **On-network only communication**
+
+User-to-user and/or multi-user communication is established.
+
+### **Off-network only communication**
+
+User-to-user and/or multi-user communication is established.
+
+### **Combined On-network/Off-network communication**
+
+User-to-user and/or multi-user communication is established that encompasses both communication modes.
+
+## 12.17.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.17.2-001] | FRMCS security requirements according to chapter 12.15 shall apply to On-network and Off-network communication. | A/T | TS 22.278
TS 22.261
TS 22.228
TS 22.280 | Covered for on-network (refer to section 12.15). |
+| [R-12.17.2-002] | FRMCS QoS requirements (reference QoS section 12.10) shall apply to On-network and Off-network communication. | A/T | TS 22.261
TS 22.280
TS 22.289 | Covered for on-network (refer to section 12.10). |
+| [R-12.17.2-003] | FRMCS positioning accuracy requirements according to chapter 12.14 shall apply to On-network and Off-network communication. | A/T | TS 22.261 | Partly covered for on-network (refer to section 12.14). |
+| [R-12.17.2-004] | The FRMCS System requirements applicable for communication recording as specified in the recording and access application use cases shall apply to On-network and Off-network communication. | A/T | TS 22.280 | See gap analysis of sub-clause 6.10. |
+| [R-12.17.2-005] | FRMCS On-network communication shall support the flexible use of different radio bearers (see Bearer Flexibility). | A/T | TS 22.278
TS 22.261
TS 22.280 | TS 22.280
See sub-clauses in chapter 5 and 6 |
+| [R-12.17.2-006] | FRMCS Equipment shall support On-network only as well as On- and Off-network relay communication. | T | TS 22.278
TS 22.261
TS 22.280 | 22.278 – sub-clause 7A:
Mode 1 covered by ProSe UE-to-Network relay (single-hop relay with UE-to-Network relay UE between remote UE and gNb)
Mode 2 not covered by ProSe UE-to-UE Relay (multi-hop relays not covered)
Mode 3 not covered (multi-hop relays not covered).
22.261: UE-to-Network Relay not covered in 5GS.
22.280 [R-7.11-001]: use of off-net and on-net MCX Services simultaneously |
+| [R-12.17.2-007] | FRMCS shall be able to support Off-network communication that tide over a distance between FRMCS UE's of up to 3km. | T | TS 22.289 | Covered by table 5.2.2-2 (relevant for Off-Network MCData Service only) |
+
+| Reference Number | | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.17.2-008] | FRMCS Equipment shall support Off-network only as well as Off-network relay communication. | T | TS 22.278
TS 22.261
TS 22.280 | 22.278 – sub-clause 7A:
Mode 1 covered by ProSe UE-to-Network relay (single-hop relay with UE-to-Network relay UE between remote UE and gNb)
Mode 2 not covered by ProSe UE-to-UE Relay (multi-hop relays not covered)
Mode 3 not covered (multi-hop relays not covered).
22.261: UE-to-Network Relay not covered in 5GS.
22.280 [R-7.11-001]: use of off-net and on-net MCX Services simultaneously |
+
+## 12.18 Call restriction service
+
+### 12.18.1 Description
+
+Call restriction based on location information and/or user identity is widely used in China railway market. It is proposed that FRMCS supports this service. This service restricts calls outside specific area according to the location information and/or user identity.
+
+### 12.18.2 Pre-conditions
+
+FRMCS user is attached to the FRMCS system.
+
+### 12.18.3 Service Flows
+
+Scenario 1: The dispatcher calls the driver; the call shall be allowed in the area managed by the dispatcher according to the location information (i.e. calls outside area managed by dispatcher are restricted)
+
+Scenario 2: The user calls the dispatcher, whether the call is allowed or restricted depends on the user identity.
+
+### 12.18.4 Post-conditions
+
+If the driver is located within the area managed by the dispatcher, the call is allowed.
+
+If the driver is outside the area managed by the dispatcher, the call is restricted.
+
+Only an authorised user (e.g. the driver) is able to initiate the call to dispatcher, calls from other users to dispatcher will be restricted.
+
+## 12.18.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.18-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to support the call restriction service taking into account the user identity and/or location information. | A | 22.280 | Covered by R-5.9a-020, R-5.9a-021, R-5.11-0XX, in particular R-5.11-007 and R-5.11-009 |
+
+## 12.19 Allocation and isolation of FRMCS communication resources
+
+### 12.19.1 Introduction
+
+Rail communication distinguishes between critical, performance and business applications. It is an essential task of the FRMCS System to support segregation of data transmission, in this context the isolation of railway application data utilizing the same available transport resources. The principle of segregation of data transmission applies to:
+
+- FRMCS communication infrastructure may be shared by multiple railway undertakings;
+- Different railway applications of one railway undertaking require isolated and customized communication resources (transport resources and functionalities) for each application.
+
+In general, it is anticipated that isolated transport services can be provided with a predictable and guaranteed QoS.
+
+### 12.19.2 Use case: Isolation of FRMCS communication resources
+
+#### 12.19.2.1 Description
+
+##### **Scenario 1: Isolation for individual railway undertakings**
+
+An FRMCS System infrastructure manager may have to host different railway undertakings. Due to isolation reasons, these railway undertakings require segregation of their communication and a predictable and guaranteed QoS.
+
+##### **Scenario 2: Isolation among categories of applications belonging to one railway undertaking**
+
+Railway community has classified their application to different categories, i.e. critical, performance and business. Due to isolation reasons, the related communications require segregation of data transmission having a predictable and guaranteed QoS for the different categories of applications.
+
+#### 12.19.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+##### **General**
+
+Segregation of data transmission is supported by the FRMCS system.
+
+##### **Scenario 1: Isolation reasons for individual railway undertakings**
+
+Railway undertakings need their own segregated transport resources and network functionalities needed for their communications.
+
+##### **Scenario 2: Isolation among categories of applications belonging to one railway undertaking**
+
+Railway undertaking assigns each application category to their own segregated transport resources and network functionalities needed for their communications.
+
+### 12.19.2.3 Service flows
+
+#### **Scenario 1: Isolation reasons for individual railway undertakings**
+
+Each railway undertaking in a country utilises dedicated and isolated transport resources and network functionalities.
+
+#### **Scenario 2: Isolation among categories of applications belonging to one railway undertaking**
+
+Each application category of one railway undertaking utilises dedicated and isolated transport resources and network functionalities.
+
+### 12.19.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+#### **Scenario1**
+
+Each railway undertaking in a country obtains dedicated and segregated transport resources and network functionalities.
+
+#### **Scenario2**
+
+Each application category of one railway undertaking obtains dedicated and segregated transport resources and network functionalities.
+
+## 12.19.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.19.2.5-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to support the segregation of transport data for different application categories. | A/T | 22.261, clause 4 | “Flexible network operations are the mainstay of the 5G system. The capabilities to provide this flexibility include network slicing, network capability exposure, scalability, and diverse mobility. Other network operations requirements address the necessary control and data plane resource efficiencies, as well as network configurations that optimize service delivery by minimizing routing between end users and application servers.” |
+| [R-12.19.2.5-002] | The FRMCS System shall support dedicated QoS handling for segregation of transport data. | T | 22.261 clause 6.1.1 | “Network slicing allows the operator to provide customised networks. For example, there can be different requirements on functionality (e.g., priority, charging, policy control, security, and mobility), differences in performance requirements (e.g., latency, mobility, availability, reliability and data rates), or they can serve only specific users (e.g., MPS users, Public Safety users, corporate customers, roamers, or hosting an MVNO).” |
+
+## 12.20 FRMCS Equipment capabilities for multiple FRMCS Users
+
+### 12.20.1 Introduction
+
+For communication, rail vehicles today have a dedicated terminal approach. For each type of application, voice or data (e.g. ATP), one (1:1) or several mobile terminals (1: n) are used. Multiple Mobile Terminals for one application are required for operational or availability reasons.
+
+With the introduction of the FRMCS System, the number of applications will multiply. More recent train compositions already have a large number of sensors whose information is exchanged for control or diagnosis between the vehicle and the ground control centre.
+
+With the continuation of the 1:1 principle (application equals mobile terminal) this would correspond to a multiplication of the mobile terminals. In addition, the space required for mobile terminals and roof antennas would significantly increase.
+
+## 12.20.2 Description
+
+In the case of vehicle/train composition, FRMCS Users can take full advantage of the transport facilities of the 3GPP system while ensuring priority, latency and reliability for each communication. FRMCS User and the associated communication applications need to be decoupled from the FRMCS Equipment.
+
+## 12.20.3 Pre-conditions
+
+At least one FRMCS Equipment is installed at the vehicle/train that provides transport capabilities between vehicle/train to ground or vice versa.
+
+## 12.20.4 Service flows
+
+Multiple FRMCS Users starts communication, for example:
+
+- ATP;
+- ATO;
+- Sensor information exchange.
+
+## 12.20.5 Post-conditions
+
+FRMCS Users on the vehicle/train are able to communicate to FRMCS Users on the ground or to other vehicles/trains.
+
+## 12.20.6 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.20.6-001] | Multiple FRMCS Users in the vehicle/train shall be able to use one FRMCS Equipment simultaneously. | A/T | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 sub-clause 5.15 5.15-001 |
+| [R-12.20.6-002] | The service capabilities of an FRMCS Equipment shall be attributable individually to multiple FRMCS Users. | A/T | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 [R-5.15-002] & [R-5.15-003] |
+| [R-12.20.6-003] | When an FRMCS Equipment is simultaneously used by multiple FRMCS Users, the communication for each of the FRMCS Users shall receive its required priority and QoS (latency and reliability) within the FRMCS System. | T | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 [R-5.15-003] [ |
+| [R-12.20.6-004] | When an FRMCS Equipment is simultaneously used by multiple FRMCS Users, each of the FRMCS Users shall be individually addressable. | A | TS 22.280 | TS 22.280 [R-5.15-002] |
+
+## 12.21 FRMCS System/FRMCS User roaming capabilities
+
+### 12.21.1 Introduction
+
+FRMCS Roaming use cases address the ability for an FRMCS User to make use of FRMCS Applications when he is provided service by a network different from his Home FRMCS Network. A specific use case applies for FRMCS Functional Identities (see 12.21.3 use case).
+
+It is essential for the operation of international trains, transporting passenger or freight across borders, that FRMCS Users are using the capabilities and services of other FRMCS networks.
+
+The situations envisaged also encompass situations where trains are moving to an area where a dedicated FRMCS network has been deployed for an urban area, for a region, for a rail track operated by a different company in a tunnel, in a large industrial area.
+
+Other cases are pertinent for rail operation such as trains running in countries or regions where communications services provided by the local responsible Rail Infrastructure Manager are different from the one where they have subscription or where service can only be provided by a Public Mobile Network Operator.
+
+FRMCS Roaming capabilities are necessary to ensure that Railways Undertaking will be able to use a single FRMCS Equipment for their FRMCS Users while roaming.
+
+### 12.21.2 Use case: FRMCS User is relocating towards a Visited (FRMCS) Network
+
+#### 12.21.2.1 Description
+
+This use case addresses the situation where an FRMCS User is moving beyond the coverage of its Home FRMCS Network and where communications services can be provided by another Visited (FRMCS) Network. Following scenarios for an FRMCS User are:
+
+- Relocation from Home FRMCS Network to a Visited (FRMCS) Network and vice versa;
+- Relocation from a Visited (FRMCS) Network to another Visited (FRMCS) Network.
+
+#### 12.21.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The Visited (FRMCS) Network is capable to retrieve FRMCS Users information from applicable Home FRMCS network.
+
+#### 12.21.2.3 Service flows
+
+FRMCS User is relocating from Home FRMCS Network to Visited (FRMCS) Network, or from a Visited (FRMCS) Network to another Visited (FRMCS) Network.
+
+FRMCS User makes use of FRMCS Applications that are applicable in the Home FRMCS Network and the FRMCS Application that are applicable in the Visited (FRMCS) Network.
+
+#### 12.21.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+FRMCS User is able to use FRMCS Applications after relocating to a Visited (FRMCS) Network.
+
+FRMCS User has not experienced service interruption of FRMCS Application while relocating.
+
+## 12.21.2.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.21.2-001] | The FRMCS System shall provide the technical means to allow communication services between FRMCS Users that are belonging to different administrative realms of the FRMCS System i.e. Home FRMCS Network and Visited (FRMCS) Network. | A/T | T TS 22.261
A TS 22.280 | T sub-clause 5.1.2.1
T sub-clause 5.1.2.2
A sub-clause 6.17.2 |
+| [R-12.21.2-002] | The FRMCS System shall provide communication services to FRMCS Users visiting another administrative realm i.e. Visited (FRMCS) Network. | A/T | T TS 22.261
A TS 22.280 | T sub-clause 5.1.2.1
T sub-clause 5.1.2.2
A sub-clause 6.17.2 |
+| [R-12.21.2-003] | The FRMCS System shall support a mechanism for an administrator to determine if a FRMCS User is able to use communication services in the Visited (FRMCS) Network. | A/T | T TS 22.261
A TS 22.280 | T sub-clause 5.1.2.1
A sub-clause 6.17.2 |
+| [R-12.21.2-004] | The FRMCS System shall be able to provide service continuity when relocating between FRMCS Network without the FRMCS User noticing the change. | A/T | T TS 22.261
A TS 22.280 | T sub-clause 6.18.2
A sub-clause 6.17.2 |
+| [R-12.21.2-005] | The FRMCS system shall be able to provide the same Quality of Service for the use of FRMCS Applications regardless of whether the FRMCS User is using the Home FRMCS Network or Visited (FRMCS) Network. | A/T | T TS 22.261
A TS 22.280 | T sub-clause 5.1.2.1
A sub-clause 6.17.2 |
+
+## 12.21.3 Use case: Functional Identities in FRMCS Roaming situations
+
+### 12.21.3.1 Description
+
+This use case addresses the situation where an FRMCS User or FRMCS Equipment is moving beyond the coverage of its Home FRMCS Network and where communications services can be provided by another Visited (FRMCS) Network.
+
+An FRMCS User or FRMCS Equipment in FRMCS Roaming situations (referring to 12.21.2 use case) shall be able to make use of FRMCS Functional Identities, from its Home FRMCS Network and, when applicable, from Visited (FRMCS) Networks. For instance, an FRMCS User or FRMCS Equipment in a train can be registered to a permanent FRMCS Functional Identity with its Home FRMCS Network (associated with the engine), and an FRMCS Functional Identity registered with a Visited (FRMCS) Network. For train cross border operations (e.g. FRMCS Roaming situations), some registered FRMCS Functional Identities shall remain valid for the duration of the train international run, the same FRMCS Functional Identity keeping the same association to FRMCS Equipment while border crossing.
+
+Each FRMCS Network shall maintain its own FRMCS Functional Identity addressing scheme. For the purpose of FRMCS roaming, an international FRMCS Functional Identity scheme will be used and national scheme will align on it. If a train (e.g. an FRMCS User) is involved in cross border operation, the FRMCS System shall detect automatically if an activated FRMCS Functional Identity requires a re-association to the local applicable addressing domain. The responsible local functional addressing entity in the Visiting (FRMCS) Network aligns the Home FRMCS Network functional addressing entity about FRMCS Functional Identity re-association. The activation status of the re-associated FRMCS Functional Identity will be aligned accordingly. The responsible entity of the functional address is keeping the status (active/inactive).
+
+### 12.21.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+FRMCS User is registered to at least one FRMCS Functional Identity F1 with its Home FRMCS Network.
+
+FRMCS Equipment is associated with a permanent Functional Identity administrated by the Home FRMCS Network.
+
+The Visited (FRMCS) Network is capable to retrieve FRMCS Users information from applicable Home FRMCS network.
+
+### 12.21.3.3 Service flows
+
+FRMCS User is relocating from Home FRMCS Network to Visited (FRMCS) Network, or from a Visited (FRMCS) Network to another Visited (FRMCS) Network.
+
+FRMCS Users and FRMCS Equipment register to at least one FRMCS Functional Identity F2 with the Visited (FRMCS) Network.
+
+FRMCS User makes use of FRMCS Functional Identities associated with the Home FRMCS Network, at least F1, and the FRMCS Functional Identities associated with the Visited (FRMCS) Network, at least F2.
+
+### 12.21.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+An FRMCS User and FRMCS Equipment in FRMCS Roaming situations are able to use FRMCS Functional Identities associated with both Home FRMCS Network and Visited (FRMCS) Networks.
+
+### 12.21.3.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.21.3-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to establish communication services based on FRMCS Functional Identity(ies) between FRMCS Users or FRMCS Equipment associated with different FRMCS Networks. | A/T | TS 22.280 | For communication TS 22.280, subclause 6.17.2 requirements [R-6.17.2-004] , [R-6.17.2-005], [R-6.17.2-006]
Functional alias: TS 22.280 subclause 5.9a, requirements [R-5.9a-001] up to [R-5.9a-002a] |
+| [R-12.21.3-002] | The FRMCS System shall be able to establish a communication services based on FRMCS Functional Identity(ies) associated with different FRMCS Networks. | A/T | TS 22.280 | For communication TS 22.280, subclause 6.17.2 requirements [R-6.17.2-004] , [R-6.17.2-005], [R-6.17.2-006]
Functional alias: TS 22.280 subclause 5.9a, requirements [R-5.9a-001] up to [R-5.9a-002a] |
+| [R-12.21.3-003] | The FRMCS System shall provide the necessary means for a FRMCS User or FRMCS Equipment to register and deregister FRMCS Functional Identity(ies) with the Home FRMCS Network and/or with the Visited (FRMCS) network. | A/T | TS 22.280 | For communication TS 22.280, subclause 6.17.2 requirements [R-6.17.2-004] , [R-6.17.2-005], [R-6.17.2-006]
Functional alias: TS 22.280 subclause 5.9a, requirements [R-5.9a-001] up to [R-5.9a-002a] |
+| [R-12.21.3-004] | When the FRMCS User or FRMCS Equipment is relocating between networks, the FRMCS System shall provide a mechanism to perform necessary registration/deregistration of one or multiple FRMCS Functional Identity(ies) with the Visited (FRMCS) Network operator and inform the Home FRMCS Network. | A/T | TS 22.280 | For communication TS 22.280, subclause 6.17.2 requirements [R-6.17.2-004] , [R-6.17.2-005], [R-6.17.2-006]
Functional alias: TS 22.280 subclause 5.9a, requirements [R-5.9a-001] up to [R-5.9a-002a] |
+
+## 12.22 Use case: Availability – increasing measures
+
+### 12.22.1 Description
+
+In some regions railways are a major constituent for the economy. Disturbance in the complex railway system can have a significant impact for example in the manufacturing process if components cannot be delivered in-time. There are significant improvements in train punctuality and track utilisation by using Automatic Train Protection (ATP) systems. Unavailability of the FRMCS System, FRMCS sub-systems or simple components can cause a significant impact to railway operation.
+
+ATP provides different levels of operation. The moving block mode is the most demanding one that requires multiple times more information in one second, e.g., position reports from the train towards the ground controlling entity which computes continuously the risk that consecutive trains can collide.
+
+In order to minimise the risk of FRMCS System unavailability, Single Point of Failures (SPOF) need to be eliminated. There are different strategies such as duplication of components, subsystems or the entire system. The mode of system redundancy ranges from hot-standby, warm-standby to cold-standby. Hot-standby is the most demanding mode and requires an instantaneous continuation of the end-to-end service. Also the use of only one spectrum block represents a SPOF. In case one spectrum block become unavailable due to wideband jamming or similar, the FRMCS System needs to be able to make flexible use of spectrum to minimize the risk of radio path unavailability.
+
+FRMCS System or sub-system maintenance may cause outages of some minutes or hours. Today, a high utilisation of rail tracks already reduces the number of maintenance windows. A redundant deployment of the radio access sub-system allows continuation of rail operation while one part of radio access sub-system is under maintenance.
+
+## 12.22.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The basis for setting up the FRMCS System takes into account the elimination of Single Point Of Failure which encompasses:
+
+- Usage of multiple independent spectrum blocks;
+- Duplication of system functionalities/entities of the FRMCS System.
+
+## 12.22.3 Service flows
+
+### Case 1:
+
+During train control operation, some portion of the used spectrum block is disturbed, e.g., through interference from an external source.
+
+### Case 2:
+
+During train control operation a FRMCS sub-system fails or has been put under maintenance.
+
+## 12.22.4 Post-conditions
+
+The communication service continues without interruption.
+
+Train operation efficiency is not affected in any way despite the disturbances caused by:
+
+- Interference (intentional or unintentional);
+- Unavailability of FRMCS sub-systems due to planned (maintenance) or unplanned (outage) reasons.
+
+## 12.22.5 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.22-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to provide a mechanism to allow redundancy of transmission paths making use of multiple spectrum blocks. | T | Covered in TS 22.261 chapter 7.2 by referring to TS 22.289 | The reliability figures for rail is included in 22.289 (KPI for rail) and referenced in 22.261 sub-clause 7.2 on low latency and high reliability. |
+| [R-12.22-002] | The FRMCS System shall provide a mechanism that minimizes the risk of single point of failure. | A/T | Covered in TS 22.261 chapter 7.2 by referring to TS 22.289 | The reliability figures for rail is included in 22.289 (KPI for rail) and referenced in 22.261 sub-clause 7.2 on low latency and high reliability. |
+
+## 12.23 Use case: Flexible use of available contiguous spectrum block(s) and related bandwidth(s)
+
+### 12.23.1 Introduction
+
+Globally, different contiguous spectrum block(s) with related bandwidth(s) may be available for rail communication in different areas. An FRMCS Equipment may also support different contiguous spectrum block(s) with related bandwidth(s) than the infrastructure deployed in the area. The use case addresses the general requirements related to the ability of the FRMCS System to flexibly use the maximum extent of rail spectrum available in an area, also considering the capabilities of the FRMCS Equipment that is served.
+
+### 12.23.2 Description
+
+It is essential that the FRMCS system can flexibly utilize the available bandwidth of the contiguous spectrum block(s), for both On-network and Off-network communication, also considering the contiguous spectrum block(s) and related bandwidth(s) supported by served FRMCS Equipment.
+
+### 12.23.3 Pre-conditions
+
+In certain areas, specific contiguous spectrum block(s) and related bandwidth(s) are available for rail communication. An FRMCS Equipment served in the area supports (possibly different) specific contiguous spectrum block(s) and their related bandwidth(s).
+
+### 12.23.4 Service flows
+
+The FRMCS System obtains information about the specific contiguous spectrum block(s) and their related bandwidth(s) supported by the FRMCS Equipment.
+
+The FRMCS System allocates the locally available contiguous spectrum block(s) and their related bandwidth(s), and serves FRMCS Equipment according to its supported contiguous spectrum block(s) and their related bandwidth(s).
+
+### 12.23.5 Post-conditions
+
+The FRMCS System is able to flexibly use the maximum extent of rail spectrum available in a given area, also considering the capabilities of the FRMCS Equipment that is served.
+
+### 12.23.6 Potential requirements and gap analysis
+
+| Reference Number | Requirement text | Application / Transport | SA1 spec covering | Comments |
+|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| [R-12.23-001] | The FRMCS System shall be able to support for individual contiguous spectrum blocks, bandwidths less than 5 MHz (e.g. 1.4 MHz or 3 MHz). | T | N/A | Covered by RAN specifications: - Covered by E-UTRA,
- Not covered by NR.
|
+
+## 13 Potential New Requirements
+
+This chapter lists the potential new requirements that have been considered for introduction in Rel-15 normative specifications. Only parts of “9.3 Role management and presence” and “9.7 Multiuser talker control related use cases” were introduced. All other requirements identified in the TR above but not listed below are not covered in Rel-15.
+
+The third column “SA1 spec covering” identifies the specification and the requirement number within that specification where the 22.889 requirement with the number as specified in the first column of the table is covered. The fourth column provide additional explanation if needed.
+
+---
+
+## 14 Conclusion and Recommendations
+
+This TR provides use cases and potential requirements for Railway Communication. It is proposed to start normative work based on these potential requirements.
+
+Where applicable, it is proposed to include the requirements identified by this work into the set of existing stage 1 missing critical and other specifications.
+
+Requirements not fitting to any existing specification are proposed to go into a new TS.
+
+## Annex A: Examples of Role management
+
+This annex gives some examples on how Role management is used in the railway environment. This is to better understand the use.
+
+### Functional identity
+
+Every operational railway function e.g. train driver, a shunter or Controller is identified by their functions. A non-exhaustive list is provided in the table underneath.
+
+| Functional identities |
+|----------------------------------|
+| Leading train driver |
+| Driver 2 |
+| Driver 3 |
+| Shunting leader |
+| Shunting member |
+| Track side maintenance leader |
+| Track side maintenance member |
+| Primary train controller |
+| Secondary train controller |
+| Power controller |
+| Shunting controller |
+| Trackside maintenance controller |
+| Platform inspector |
+| Public announcement |
+| Chief conductor |
+| Second conductor |
+| Third conductor |
+| Catering staff chief |
+| Diagnostics |
+
+In order to make a function of a user known to other users, the user has to register itself to a specific functional identity.
+
+For example, user can be authorised by the railway undertaking to be a train driver (functional Role) of a train. When the Driver starts the scheduled train ride, from A to B at time x, the train running schedule assigns a specific train running number for this train. In principle the train keeps this number for the complete journey. The train driver uses his communication equipment to register himself, as the leading train driver (functional Role), of train number 123 (functional identity). After registration the train driver is now registered to the FRMCS System as the leading train driver of train 123. In some cases there can be multiple Drivers on one train, so the individual Drivers can register themselves accordingly.
+
+### FRMCS Equipment Type
+
+The equipment used in the railway environment can be very specific. The FRMCS Equipment is constituted of an UE and the FRMCS Application on this UE. This depends on the location and situation the equipment is used. The following different equipment types can be used, as an example:
+
+| Equipment type | Equipment Capabilities
(Examples) |
+|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Cabin radio | Emergency button, external loudspeaker |
+| Shunting radio | Loudspeaker, hands free |
+| Trackside maintenance radio | |
+| Security staff radio | Emergency button, public emergency call button |
+| Catering staff radio | |
+| Train controller device | Emergency button, call to maintenance staff button, call to power controllers button |
+| Shunting controller device | |
+| Sensor | No HMI |
+
+These different types of FRMCS Equipment are relevant for the registration process of functional identities. For example a train driver cannot register to a functional identity using a FRMCS Equipment which is not fit for the train driver to perform his Role. So a train driver cannot perform a registration as train driver of train 123 if he uses a catering staff FRMCS Equipment (where there is no train emergency button available, no loudspeaker and handset, etc.). The registration request will be rejected by the FRMCS System.
+
+The FRMCS Equipment shall also be reachable based on the identity of the FRMCS Equipment. For example the cabin radio of a specific train can be reached by their FRMCS Equipment Identity.
+
+### **FRMCS User identity**
+
+The railway employee (a specific person) is also reachable even if no functional identity has been assigned. This is done by using a unique FRMCS User identity. This can be an E.164 number, any other number according to a specific railways numbering plan or by fully qualified domain names (FQDN). Such a number or FQDN is dedicated/ assigned to a specific railway employee. After the employee has performed the log-in procedure to the FRMCS System, he is reachable via his individual FRMCS User identity.
+
+## Annex B: Minimum functional and performance requirements for FRMCS from a perspective of Korea LTE-based railway services
+
+In this annex, minimum functional and performance requirements [5]-[6] are introduced for FRMCS from a perspective of Korea's LTE-based railway services. Here, the term 'minimum' is used from the fact that the requirements are expected to be satisfied even with previous Rel. version of 3GPP LTE. Specifically, all the functionalities and performance requirements except for the high speed (500km/h) listed in the above have been shown to be fully supported by LTE Rel. 9, which have been validated in a commercial railway with a length of 54.2km [7]. Also, train control service named as Korea Radio-Based Train Control System (KRTCS) has been shown to be feasible by handling priorities among multiple data, where the level of KRTCS is equivalent to European Train Control System (ETCS) level 3 in a train control perspective. All the specific test scenarios regarding functional and performance requirements including KRTCS have been validated in a commercial railway [8]. For promising FRMCS supporting LTE Rel. 15, more enhanced and sophisticated requirements should be provided. In that sense, these requirements can be considered as basic functional and performance requirements for FRMCS.
+
+### Minimum functional requirements
+
+In a communication perspective, the followings can be minimum functional requirements for LTE based railway communication systems. The contents of each function and each digital radio equipment are described in detail in [5]-[6].
+
+| Service | Detailed service | Description | Mandatory/Optional |
+|----------------------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
+| Voice service | Individual voice call | The system shall support voice calling between two callers. | M |
+| | Public emergency | The system shall allow the user to make a public emergency call. | M |
+| | Broadcasting voice call | The system shall support a broadcasting call. | M |
+| | Group voice call | The system shall support a group call. | M |
+| | Multi-party voice call | The system shall support a multi-party call between at least 3 different parties. | M |
+| Data service | Multimedia message service | The network shall support point-to-point and point-to-multi-point message transmission from the ground to mobile radio equipment users. | M |
+| | General data service | The system shall support broadband data communication between ground and mobile radio equipment users. | M |
+| | Train control service | The system shall support seamless data communication for stable train control. | M |
+
+| Service | Detailed service | Description | Mandatory/Optional |
+|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
+| Video service | Individual video call | The system shall support video calling between two callers. | M |
+| | Group video call | The system shall support group video calling. | M |
+| | Video information transmission | The system shall support the video information transmission function related to safe train operation. | M |
+| Call related service | Receiver /Caller ID display | The equipment shall display the receiver or caller ID in the form of a standard telephone number. | M |
+| | Receiver /caller ID display restriction | The system shall allow the ID of a specific user to be prevented from being displayed on the mobile radio equipment. | O |
+| | Priority and preemptive right | A function in which a call is allocated to the member who has top priority among the members who have different priority levels shall be provided. | M |
+| | Closed user group | The user group who can access the Korean railway integrated radio network from outside shall be restricted. | M |
+| | Call transfer | The incoming call or data message for one user shall be transferred to other devices in the network. | M |
+| | Call holding | The network shall allow the user to hold a call temporarily from an existing call. | M |
+| | Call waiting | The network shall be able to notify the user of the existing call that another user is attempting to access. | M |
+| | Charging information | When there is a network service charge, the network shall be able to provide the information on call charge and ongoing call charges. | O |
+| | Call restriction | The system shall be able to restrict a call using the network management or maintenance facility. | M |
+| | Automatic answering service | A call shall be answered automatically according to the priority of an incoming call. | M |
+| | All voice/ Video call recording | A call shall be answered automatically according to the priority of an incoming call. | M |
+
+| Service | Detailed service | Description | Mandatory/Optional |
+|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
+| Railway specialized service | Functional addressing | The system shall provide the addressing system in which the Controller can set communication with the train driver | M |
+| | Location-dependent addressing | The system shall provide the location-dependent addressing system in order to identify the destination number, which varies depending on the location of users | M |
+| | Railway emergency | The network shall provide the system to handle a voice call with high priority for a railway emergency call | M |
+| | Shunting mode | The network shall provide the system to regulate and control the user's access to the function and features of mobile radio equipment being used for shunting mode communication | M |
+| | Direct communication | The system shall support direct communication between terminals in the event that an LTE-based railway communication service is not normally available due to a failure in gNB | O |
+
+### Minimum performance requirements
+
+In the following table, specific performance requirements are listed as a base line of performance requirements for real FRMCS. The detailed performance of a railway communications system and the contents of the interface for each equipment are described in detail in [5]-[6].
+
+| Items | Description | Remarks |
+|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Coverage and performance | Coverage shall be continuous from a time and space perspective, and the temporal and spatial range to guarantee stability shall be more than 98% based on the vehicle being equipped with an external antenna.
The network shall be able to accommodate the mobile terminal for railway communication.
The system shall be able to provide communication when moving at track speed limit or 500 km/h, whichever is lower.
| |
+| Call setting time | Railway emergency call < 1s (90%), < 2s (99% or more)
Broadcasting or group call < 1s (90%), < 2.5s (99% or more)
| *
External PSTN connection not
|
+| Handover | The network shall be able to have seamless data transmission. and the handover success rate shall be 99%. | |
+| Call access success | The call access success rate shall be 99% or more. | |
+| Connection drop rate | The system shall be able to guarantee a call disconnection rate less than 0.01 times per hour during a lengthy call | |
+| Train control data transmission | The network shall guarantee more than 99% data reliability to transmit data for train control. | |
+| Network redundancy | The network including eNb equipment, core equipment and server shall be designed to be redundant for stability and availability. | However, the application scope of redundancy is determined by the operator. |
+| Broadcasting and group call area | Radio equipment in a restricted area can participate in broadcasting and group call, and the radio equipment out of broadcasting and group call area during call shall be excluded from call. | |
+
+## Annex C: Applicability to On-network/Off-network communication
+
+The different types of communication and support applications related to On-Network and Off-Network are covered by the table below:
+
+| Section | Use case | Applicability to On-Network | Applicability to Off-Network |
+|---------|----------|-----------------------------|------------------------------|
+|---------|----------|-----------------------------|------------------------------|
+
+| | | | |
+|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|----------------|
+| 5.3 | Power on the UE | Yes | Not applicable |
+| 5.4 | Access to the FRMCS System to activate the FRMCS Equipment | Yes | Not applicable |
+| 5.5 | Controlled power down of UE | Yes | Not applicable |
+| 5.6 | Uncontrolled power down UE | Yes | Not applicable |
+| 6.2 | Multi-train voice communication for Drivers and Ground FRMCS User(s) | Yes | Yes |
+| 6.3 | On-train outgoing voice communication from the Driver towards the Controller(s) of the train | Yes | No |
+| 6.4 | Railway emergency communication | Yes | No |
+| 6.5 | Automatic Train Protection (ATP) support by the FRMCS System | Yes | No |
+| 6.6 | Trackside Maintenance Warning System communication | | |
+| | 6.6.2 | Yes | Yes |
+| | 6.6.3 | Yes | Yes |
+| 6.7 | Pushed Real Time Video streaming | Yes | No |
+| 6.8 | Public emergency call | Yes | No |
+| 6.9 | Data communication for possession management | Yes | No |
+| 6.10 | Recording of communication | | |
+| | 6.10.2 | Yes | Yes |
+| 6.11 | Remote control of engines communication | | |
+| | 6.11.2 | Yes | Yes |
+| 6.12 | Automatic Train Operation data communication | | |
+| | 6.12.3 | Yes | Yes |
+| 6.13 | Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure | Yes | No |
+| 6.14 | Data transmission in real time | Yes | No |
+| 6.15 | On-train incoming voice or video communication from the Controller(s) of the train towards the drivers | Yes | No |
+| 6.16 | Data communication for Train Operation System Communication | | |
+| | 6.16.2 | Yes | No |
+| | 6.16.3 | Yes | Yes |
+| | 6.16.4 | Yes | Yes |
+| 6.17 | On-train safety device to ground communication | Yes | No |
+| 6.18 | Train Integrity monitoring data communication | | |
+| | 6.18.2 | Yes | Yes |
+
+| | | | |
+|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|-----|
+| 6.19 | Broadcast of public emergency warning information | Yes | No |
+| 6.20 | Safety related Critical advisory messaging | | |
+| 6.20.2 | | Yes | Yes |
+| 6.20.3 | | Yes | No |
+| 6.21 | Automatic Train Protection data communication | Yes | No |
+| 6.22 | Voice communication transfer | Yes | No |
+| 7.1 | Transmission of real time video | Yes | No |
+| 7.2 | Transfer of CCTV archives | Yes | No |
+| 7.3 | Massive Inter-carriage data transfer | Yes | Yes |
+| 7.5 | On-train outgoing voice communication from train staff towards a ground user | Yes | No |
+| 8.2 | Live streaming of multimedia | Yes | Yes |
+| 8.3 | Bulk transfer of multimedia from ground to train | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.2 | Assured voice communication (AVC) | | |
+| 9.2.2 | | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.2.3 | | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.2.4 | | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.2.5 | | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.3 | Functional identities and role management | | |
+| 9.3.3 | | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.3.4 | | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.3.5 | | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.3.6 | | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.3.7 | | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.3.8 | | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.3.9 | | Yes | No |
+| 9.4 | Location services | | |
+
+| | | | |
+|-------|----------------------------------------------|-----|------------------|
+| | 9.4.2 | Yes | Yes |
+| | 9.4.3 | Yes | Yes |
+| | 9.4.4 | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.5 | FRMCS-user communication handling | | |
+| | 9.5.2 | Yes | Yes |
+| | 9.5.3 | Yes | Yes |
+| | 9.5.4 | Yes | Yes |
+| | 9.5.5 | Yes | Yes |
+| | 9.5.6 | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.7 | Multiuser talker control | | |
+| | 9.7.2 | Yes | Yes |
+| | 9.7.3 | Yes | Yes |
+| | 9.7.4 | Yes | Yes |
+| | 9.7.5 | Yes | Yes |
+| | 9.7.6 | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.8.1 | Robust mission critical group communications | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.8 | Authorisation of communication | | |
+| | 9.8.2 | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.9 | Authorisation of application | | |
+| | 9.9.2 | Yes | Yes a |
+| | 9.9.1 | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.10 | Sharing FRMCS Equipment by FRMCS Users | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.11 | FRMCS naming authority | Yes | No |
+| 9.12 | Wayside-Centric Automatic Train Control | Yes | No |
+| 9.13 | Autonomous Train Control and Operation | Yes | Yes |
+
+a A default profile shall be considered.
+
+| | | | |
+|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|-------------|
+| | | | |
+| 9.14 | Virtual Coupling | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.15 | Composite-based train operation | Yes | Yes |
+| 9.16 | Arbitration
9.16.2 |
Yes |
Yes |
+| 9.17 | Data communication to exchange key information for train safety application | Yes | No |
+| 11.1 | Charging and Billing information | Yes | No |
+
+**Table C-1. Applicability to On-network/Off-network to use cases.**
+
+## Annex D: Change history
+
+| Change history | | | | | | | |
+|----------------|---------|-----------|------|-----|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| Date | Meeting | TDoc | CR | Rev | Cat | Subject/Comment | New version |
+| 2020-09 | SA#89 | - | - | - | - | Created from TR 22.889, same technical content as TR 22.889 v.17.3.0 | 18.0.0 |
+| 2021-03 | SA#91e | SP-210200 | 0001 | 1 | D | Align TR with SA1 drafting rules on Inclusive Language | 18.1.0 |
+| 2021-03 | SA#91e | SP-210223 | 0002 | 1 | C | Changes to Critical Support Applications "Inviting-a-FRMCS User to a voice communication" use case | 18.1.0 |
+| 2021-03 | SA#91e | SP-210223 | 0003 | 1 | C | Merging of Railway Emergency Communications | 18.1.0 |
+| 2021-09 | SA#93e | SP-211049 | 0004 | 1 | C | Changes to Critical Support Applications Inviting-a-FRMCS User to a voice communication use case to support Interworking with GSM-R | 18.2.0 |
+| 2021-09 | SA#93e | SP-211049 | 0006 | 1 | C | Changes to Critical Support Applications Multiuser talker control use case to support configurable initial talker permission | 18.2.0 |
+| 2021-12 | SP-94 | SP-211489 | 0008 | 2 | C | Triggering a change of communication privileges for a particular FRMCS User based on identities and/or talker status | 18.3.0 |
+| 2021-12 | SP-94 | SP-211489 | 0009 | | C | Arbitration: automatic answer | 18.3.0 |
+| 2021-12 | SP-94 | SP-211489 | 0010 | 2 | C | Alignment between Changing conditions of Railway Emergency Alert and Merging Railway Emergency Alert | 18.3.0 |
+| 2021-12 | SP-94 | SP-211489 | 0011 | | C | Service interworking between FRMCS and GSM-R of presence is no more required | 18.3.0 |
+| 2022-03 | SP#95e | SP-220079 | 0012 | 1 | B | Adding MCX Service Ad hoc Group Communication as alternative capability to support Railway Emergency Communication | 18.4.0 |
+| 2022-06 | SA#96 | SP-220430 | 15 | 1 | F | Call restriction based on subparts of functional identities | 18.5.0 |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/08e28a86c71221f509c8f3a828e89af2_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/08e28a86c71221f509c8f3a828e89af2_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..01e890687e5c348ff59c3fd55263577ca4cd0755
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/08e28a86c71221f509c8f3a828e89af2_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:838c2a56f8c7aa15be7977f2c5781d4ec581418b327d9087e35c6d8607374096
+size 115420
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/15e4a144a88176b71ea3eff2722253b0_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/15e4a144a88176b71ea3eff2722253b0_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..45d10d8dc8dcb9792012d50d4e09e0246772ece1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/15e4a144a88176b71ea3eff2722253b0_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6504c82fcf0a3566a7dcff6a628234fd3cda018aeee7fe86038279fe1e45fa0d
+size 48808
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7c8f7dcd299e3a40ef1ec947f1a9a08ca521e185
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b4c195dc3cf274a49eeb4525ca96851df60e8056dc3026871496d784467a5fe9
+size 34135
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/2de714cedbbdd36f901f71bafa78f75a_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/2de714cedbbdd36f901f71bafa78f75a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6deeb2d7c31cfd5a926e6db7d73c00931d446ce3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/2de714cedbbdd36f901f71bafa78f75a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a08729ae36cf5b63fc0137652ab01d396103164a1de84c2367f0eb6aac5f2e79
+size 41589
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7c08222255fc313aa621eb86964b5a8b302367f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d29bb9cb25f3e232fa3e588a1471970fc3086d500f80c4717863da395e8f4ab1
+size 9523
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..92bca1355c31caf8acf1e97e3ed0a15cf739de30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:979f622293a630726656b98d7676846e954a1648d3e44945845a289d7c8d8780
+size 5678
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/7b4218684dabfd7cc15685f82dbe5faf_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/7b4218684dabfd7cc15685f82dbe5faf_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..741da7c6dfe9d54aae9848e03226deff72cec082
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/7b4218684dabfd7cc15685f82dbe5faf_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3f6e1c9eb4fd46a3562c0d132621bf5feae7c4e4250f384e391b9ba224f7ad7c
+size 29750
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/805c475f0859e607af0530ba43194bf1_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/805c475f0859e607af0530ba43194bf1_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e2080006480be532eb4ac154aee3bc25ba254be4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/805c475f0859e607af0530ba43194bf1_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d767ac774a85f956383b5dce4302ebcfe3acbd0575eeee55d10d78440c937651
+size 73657
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/81a4cbf0b3c4cbc065efdf8f800dadde_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/81a4cbf0b3c4cbc065efdf8f800dadde_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f79faeb36724276f779af37ff54f75ec27d9050e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/81a4cbf0b3c4cbc065efdf8f800dadde_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:713fa069d94dee790d34c7386eafd3deff086215a75a6a488bfe10e960ef5b66
+size 130285
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/8307f6b04df072c9332f9987e034272c_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/8307f6b04df072c9332f9987e034272c_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..29428c8e687ff1e1d6758ebcdab38c2d7e7ad5c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/8307f6b04df072c9332f9987e034272c_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:46f4c877cdf5857b5c6779fc4732838b3ef08406375552890dba8977fc51b589
+size 42636
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/836008eb3303ade9e269f93c04dc0a2e_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/836008eb3303ade9e269f93c04dc0a2e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc7b092fc09fd8394699a0d1503a50ef2f83b828
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/836008eb3303ade9e269f93c04dc0a2e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f4fa2c4da91547d6df9e4d66bd01c88d4ad9e610bfadfe2aa6d02c1f4fe1fc16
+size 35460
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/9c1d3678db4a12d5864cb2a4def1135d_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/9c1d3678db4a12d5864cb2a4def1135d_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce36c81b77811f56042001ef1bb0ead38df14d38
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/9c1d3678db4a12d5864cb2a4def1135d_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5f0a5d4e9ac14e8c5d029d60b0bedd52c8d210ed27899ba2d4cfab6c6aadee66
+size 59772
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/c0e88e4bd3a209b66ee7cb67e1cec2be_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/c0e88e4bd3a209b66ee7cb67e1cec2be_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2714a425793f07a625d93481c69ee163324e62c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/c0e88e4bd3a209b66ee7cb67e1cec2be_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9317daf18f61fea9f39f3f4f2f1a7fa3e5e4d3d2428318caaef5c6a37c714767
+size 53997
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/e159e9f78612406820a4d40e26e01413_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/e159e9f78612406820a4d40e26e01413_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..448bda4608fb00da80bb4630539ec4ede223c612
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/e159e9f78612406820a4d40e26e01413_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7c258e8432b094485cee4920c6380ea2f8e792eafacd9795ad21e14068c24f34
+size 27144
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/e7c6a6e4c3047dac05a3b92e396e9794_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/e7c6a6e4c3047dac05a3b92e396e9794_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..053831a37883a478e273f8064be91ec5240ddb65
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/e7c6a6e4c3047dac05a3b92e396e9794_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:eb5ce2918d0be8e636dce154da3e554e67d046528d69f431fd73a2761a5b592d
+size 39649
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/f64e1e0997695248c0cd4122c5b1a170_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/f64e1e0997695248c0cd4122c5b1a170_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0d124ba8e2a614601e9deaf07ee73798bec9718
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/f64e1e0997695248c0cd4122c5b1a170_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f61994690578d0d826289dd06148ea9c0d57803a222f290ec24316abe0d8e2e3
+size 33013
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/raw.md b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7c3959b51b40e1553b4eebc8385229e5188fe1b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/22_series/22990/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,1241 @@
+
+
+# 3GPP TR 22.990 V18.0.0 (2021-12) ---
+
+*Technical Report*
+
+## **3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Study on Off-Network for Rail; Stage 1 (Release 18)**
+
+
+
+---
+
+The logo for 5G Advanced, featuring a stylized '5G' with a green signal wave icon above the 'G', and the word 'ADVANCED' in smaller letters to the right.
+
+5G Advanced logo
+
+
+
+The 3GPP logo, consisting of the letters '3GPP' in a bold, black, stylized font. Below the 'P' is a red signal wave icon. Underneath the logo, the text 'A GLOBAL INITIATIVE' is written in a smaller, all-caps font.
+
+---
+
+3GPP logo
+
+## --- **Keywords**
+
+
+
+## **3GPP**
+
+## --- **Postal address**
+
+## --- **3GPP support office address**
+
+650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis
+Valbonne - FRANCE
+Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16
+
+## --- **Internet**
+
+
+
+## --- **Copyright Notification**
+
+No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.
+The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
+
+© 2021, 3GPP Organizational Partners (ARIB, ATIS, CCSA, ETSI, TSDSI, TTA, TTC).
+All rights reserved.
+
+UMTSTM is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its members
+3GPP™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
+LTE™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
+GSM® and the GSM logo are registered and owned by the GSM Association
+
+## --- Contents
+
+| | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| Foreword ..... | 5 |
+| Introduction ..... | 5 |
+| 1 Scope..... | 6 |
+| 2 References..... | 6 |
+| 3 Definitions and abbreviations ..... | 6 |
+| 3.1 Definitions..... | 6 |
+| 3.2 Symbols..... | 6 |
+| 3.3 Abbreviations ..... | 7 |
+| 4 Overview..... | 7 |
+| 5 Communication Applications related use cases..... | 7 |
+| 5.1 Introduction ..... | 7 |
+| 5.2 Trackside Maintenance Warning System communication..... | 7 |
+| 5.2.1 Description ..... | 7 |
+| 5.2.2 Pre-conditions..... | 9 |
+| 5.2.3 Service Flows ..... | 9 |
+| 5.2.4 Post-conditions ..... | 10 |
+| 5.2.5 Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality ..... | 10 |
+| 5.2.6 Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case and gap analysis ..... | 10 |
+| 5.2.6.1 Requirements related to the Service layer ..... | 10 |
+| 5.2.6.2 Requirements related to the Transport layer..... | 11 |
+| 5.3 Remote Control of Engines communications..... | 11 |
+| 5.3.1 Description ..... | 11 |
+| 5.3.2 Pre-conditions..... | 13 |
+| 5.3.3 Service Flows ..... | 13 |
+| 5.3.4 Post-conditions ..... | 14 |
+| 5.3.5 Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality ..... | 14 |
+| 5.3.6 Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case..... | 14 |
+| 5.3.6.1 Requirements related to the Service layer ..... | 14 |
+| 5.3.6.2 Requirements related to the Transport layer..... | 15 |
+| 5.4 Train integrity monitoring data communication ..... | 15 |
+| 5.4.1 Description ..... | 15 |
+| 5.4.2 Pre-conditions..... | 16 |
+| 5.4.3 Service Flows ..... | 16 |
+| 5.4.4 Post-conditions ..... | 17 |
+| 5.4.5 Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality ..... | 17 |
+| 5.4.6 Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case..... | 17 |
+| 5.4.6.1 Requirements related to the Service layer ..... | 17 |
+| 5.4.6.2 Requirements related to the Transport layer..... | 18 |
+| 5.5 Shunting communication..... | 18 |
+| 5.5.1 Description ..... | 18 |
+| 5.5.2 Pre-conditions..... | 18 |
+| 5.5.3 Service Flows ..... | 18 |
+| 5.5.4 Post-conditions ..... | 20 |
+| 5.5.5 Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality ..... | 20 |
+| 5.5.6 Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case..... | 20 |
+| 5.5.6.1 Requirements related to the Service layer ..... | 20 |
+| 5.5.6.2 Requirements related to the Transport layer..... | 21 |
+| 5.6 Train ready for departure communication..... | 22 |
+| 5.6.1 Description ..... | 22 |
+| 5.6.2 Pre-conditions..... | 23 |
+| 5.6.3 Service Flows ..... | 23 |
+| 5.6.4 Post-conditions ..... | 24 |
+| 5.6.5 Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality ..... | 24 |
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|
+| 5.6.6 | Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case..... | 24 |
+| 5.6.6.1 | Requirements related to the Service layer ..... | 24 |
+| 5.6.6.2 | Requirements related to the Transport layer..... | 24 |
+| 5.7 | Autonomous Train Control and Operation..... | 25 |
+| 5.7.1 | Description ..... | 25 |
+| 5.7.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 26 |
+| 5.7.3 | Service Flows ..... | 26 |
+| 5.7.4 | Post-conditions ..... | 26 |
+| 5.7.5 | Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality ..... | 26 |
+| 5.7.6 | Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case..... | 26 |
+| 5.7.6.1 | Requirements related to the Service layer ..... | 26 |
+| 5.7.6.2 | Requirements related to the Transport layer..... | 26 |
+| 5.8 | Virtual Coupling..... | 27 |
+| 5.8.1 | Description ..... | 27 |
+| 5.8.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 28 |
+| 5.8.3 | Service Flows ..... | 29 |
+| 5.8.4 | Post-conditions ..... | 29 |
+| 5.8.5 | Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality ..... | 29 |
+| 5.8.6 | Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case..... | 29 |
+| 5.8.6.1 | Requirements related to the Service layer ..... | 29 |
+| 5.8.6.2 | Requirements related to the Transport layer..... | 29 |
+| 5.9 | Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communication..... | 30 |
+| 5.9.1 | Description ..... | 30 |
+| 5.9.2 | Pre-conditions..... | 31 |
+| 5.9.3 | Service Flows ..... | 31 |
+| 5.9.4 | Post-conditions ..... | 31 |
+| 5.9.5 | Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality ..... | 31 |
+| 5.9.6 | Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case..... | 32 |
+| 5.9.6.1 | Requirements related to the Service layer ..... | 32 |
+| 5.9.6.2 | Requirements related to the Transport layer..... | 32 |
+| 6 | Void..... | 33 |
+| 6.1 | Void..... | 33 |
+| 7 | Void..... | 33 |
+| 7.1 | Void..... | 33 |
+| 8 | Identified issues..... | 33 |
+| 8.1 | Introduction ..... | 33 |
+| 8.2 | Identified issue 1: Communication range..... | 33 |
+| 8.2.1 | Description ..... | 33 |
+| 8.2.2 | Limitations, missing requirements and gaps ..... | 33 |
+| 8.3 | Identified issue 2: MCX Support ..... | 33 |
+| 8.x.1 | Description ..... | 33 |
+| 8.x.2 | Limitations, missing requirements and gaps ..... | 34 |
+| 8.x | Identified issue y: ..... | 34 |
+| 8.x.1 | Description ..... | 34 |
+| 8.x.2 | Limitations, missing requirements and gaps ..... | 34 |
+| 9 | Consolidated potential requirements..... | 35 |
+| 10 | Conclusion and recommendations ..... | 35 |
+| Annex A: | Change history ..... | 36 |
+
+# --- Foreword
+
+This Technical Report has been produced by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).
+
+The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within the TSG and may change following formal TSG approval. Should the TSG modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by the TSG with an identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows:
+
+Version x.y.z
+
+where:
+
+- x the first digit:
+ - 1 presented to TSG for information;
+ - 2 presented to TSG for approval;
+ - 3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control.
+- y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections, updates, etc.
+- z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document.
+
+# --- Introduction
+
+This document studies if further enhancements to the 5G system are feasible or not for the support of Off-Network for Rail.
+
+This document collects all Off-Network use cases from SA1 Study on Future Railway Mobile Communication System (FRMCS) in order to refine them and new use cases to support Off-Network for Rail in clause 5 for Communication Applications.
+
+The potential new service requirements are also consolidated in clause 5.
+
+The results of gap analysis identify limitations, missing requirements and existing functionalities supported by 3GPP in clause 5.
+
+Following the gap analysis, the assessment of technical feasibility, complexity and overhead of normative 3GPP adjustments to support limitations, missing requirements and functionalities as required by Off-Network for Rail is considered in clause 8.
+
+Potential requirements are then consolidated in clause 9.
+
+The conclusions and recommendations are proposed in clause 10 to conclude if further enhancements to the 5G system are needed and feasible for the support of Off-Network for Rail.
+
+# --- 1 Scope
+
+The present document analyses Rail Off-Network use cases in order to derive potential requirements and investigate if normative adjustments are feasible or not.
+
+# --- 2 References
+
+The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present document.
+
+- References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or non-specific.
+- For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.
+- For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document *in the same Release as the present document*.
+
+- [1] 3GPP TR 21.905: "Vocabulary for 3GPP Specifications".
+- [2] 3GPP TS 22.289: "Mobile Communication System for Railways".
+- [3] 3GPP TS 22.179: "Mission Critical Push To Talk (MCPTT)".
+- [4] 3GPP TS 22.280: "Mission Critical Services Common Requirements (MCCoRe)".
+- [5] 3GPP TS 22.281: "Mission Critical Video services".
+- [6] 3GPP TS 22.282: "Mission Critical Data services".
+- [7] 3GPP TS 22.261: "Service requirements for the 5G system".
+- [8] 3GPP TS 22.185: "Service requirements for V2X services".
+- [9] 3GPP TS 22.186: "Enhancement of 3GPP support for V2X scenarios".
+- [10] UIC MG-7900: "Future Railway Mobile Communication System Use Cases".
+
+# --- 3 Definitions and abbreviations
+
+## 3.1 Definitions
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the terms and definitions given in 3GPP TR 21.905 [1] and the following apply. A term defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same term, if any, in 3GPP TR 21.905 [1].
+
+**example:** text used to clarify abstract rules by applying them literally.
+
+## 3.2 Symbols
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the following symbols apply:
+
+| | |
+|----------|---------------|
+| | |
+|----------|---------------|
+
+## 3.3 Abbreviations
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the abbreviations given in 3GPP TR 21.905 [1] and the following apply. An abbreviation defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same abbreviation, if any, in 3GPP TR 21.905 [1].
+
+
+
+# --- 4 Overview
+
+The present document is a 900 series Technical Report (TR) written by 3GPP TSG SA WG1 (SA1). Such a TR is not normative, i.e. cannot be used for implementation directly. It is primarily written by SA1 to summarise the high-level Off-Network communication needs of the railway community and to identify the corresponding requirements.
+
+## Rail Context
+
+Future rail communication is an important part of the digitalization of rail operations. In addition to network-oriented communication, this also includes that without involving the network. GSM-R already used this and was called Direct Mode to describe the ability of a User Equipment to communicate directly with each other, independent of the network.
+
+Off-Network is a new terminology for the Rail sector, already introduced within 3GPP MCX specifications. UIC will promote the use of Off-Network to replace Direct Mode. But unfortunately, the terminology has slight differences in the meaning. For example, the Rail sector considers use of Off-Network communications where no network services are available either due to network failure (e.g. coverage, capacity, etc.) or due to lack of coverage (remote area's). In 3GPP MCX specifications, Off-Network communications can be setup even when network services are available.
+
+In addition to voice communication, Off-Network communication will also increasingly be used for the exchange of train safety data in the future.
+
+Examples of use cases which require Direct Mode:
+
+- Automatic Train Protection (ATP) data communication
+- Automatic Train Operation (ATO) data communication
+- Critical real-time video
+- Virtual Coupling data communication
+
+Virtual Coupling data communication is the only use case where Off-Network is the intended mode of operation (also called “default mode”) even if the network is available.
+
+All other use cases shall consider Network-Oriented mode as the default mode when the network is available (for the first and following attachments) and shifting to Off-Network when the network is not available.
+
+# --- 5 Communication Applications related use cases
+
+## 5.1 Introduction
+
+This clause describes use cases of Communication Applications (e.g. Virtual Coupling data communication).
+
+## 5.2 Trackside Maintenance Warning System communication
+
+### 5.2.1 Description
+
+Generally, trackside maintenance occurs during daily train operation. For safety reasons, trackside maintenance staff need to be informed about approaching trains entering the worksite. Thus, the intention of a trackside warning system is to inform trackside staff about the approaching train to keep rail capacity available while working on the tracks.
+
+The trackside maintenance warning system consists of a single or multiple train detector entity(ies) (sensors, lookout man or interlocking station information + communication device), and a single or multiple warning entity(ies). The train detector entity is responsible to detect the approaching train and to trigger the alarm to the warning entities (as an option, the alarm should be triggered to a central/control entity also that relays the alarm to all warning entities). The warning entity indicates trackside workers about the approaching train on existing or adjacent tracks in form of visual signal e.g. flashing light and audio signal e.g. tone/horn. In large worksites or areas of high-speed trains, multiple warning entities can be spread out along the worksite to repeat the train approaching indication. In addition, the trackside maintenance staff will receive the train approaching indication on its FRMCS Equipment (i.e. wearable device).
+
+When the train has cleared the warning zone, the indication is withdrawn automatically by the warning system, by the interlocking or manually by an authorised operator located inside or at the edge of the warning zone.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the trackside maintenance warning system. A train (1) is shown approaching a worksite (4) from the left at a speed of 500 km/h. The worksite is marked by a yellow and black striped barrier. The warning zone is indicated by a light blue shaded area. The distance from the train to the start of the warning zone is labeled 'Min 3 500 m'. The distance from the start of the warning zone to the start of the worksite is labeled 'Max 5 000 m'. The distance from the end of the worksite to the end of the warning zone is labeled 'Min 3 500 m'. Stationary trackside warning devices (2) and personal UE(s) (3) are shown at the entrance and exit of the warning zone. A worker (4) is shown inside the worksite, receiving a warning signal from a stationary trackside warning device (2) and a personal UE (3).
+
+Diagram of the Trackside Maintenance Warning System showing a train approaching a worksite with warning zones and communication devices.
+
+1. Train approaches warning zone
+2. Train is detected by stationary trackside warning device (automatically) or look-out man (manually)
+3. Stationary unit or look-out man sends warning to [1..30] worker(s) (via stationary trackside warning device(s) or via personal UE(s))
+4. Warning receives at worksite not less than 25 seconds (time for worker(s) to protect themselves)
+
+**Figure 5.2.1-1: Description of the Trackside Maintenance Warning System**
+
+Train detector entities and warning entities constitute the warning system that requires secured/safe continuous radio transmission of data between the sensors and the warning entities (e.g. keep alive messages for robustness and location information of entities/workers to differentiate between the tracks with a lateral distance accuracy of less than 1 meter). In addition, it encompasses the secured/safe radio transmission of the train approaching indication (i.e. start/stop transmitting the indication to the track workers) among the warning system and the FRMCS Equipment of the trackside staff. Train detection is outside scope of the warning system.
+
+Due to the fact that such a warning system deployment is temporary and on-network communication services are not always available at the track, the FRMCS System provides necessary off-network communication services for the trackside warning system. Trackside maintenance warning system in off-network mode is well suited for small, short-term construction sites but should also be relevant for large and long-term construction sites.
+
+The maximum train speed in the warning zone is 500 kmph.
+
+Note: no speed limit applies in worksites in some Countries.
+
+Communications between train detector entities located at both edges of the warning zone are not supported by the Trackside maintenance warning system.
+
+As a deployment option, communication between the approaching train and the trackside warning system should be supported to e.g. avoid train detectors.
+
+Fixed and moving worksites e.g. carrying out inspection work are supported by the Trackside maintenance warning system.
+
+One-way (i.e. one train detector entity) and two-way (i.e. two train detector entities) traffic protection are supported by the Trackside maintenance warning system.
+
+The minimum configuration of a warning system is:
+
+- One train detector entity located closed or inside the worksite (i.e. detection by visual detection)
+- One warning entity located inside the worksite
+
+The maximum configuration of a warning system is:
+
+- Two train detector entities located at both edges of the warning zone
+- The maximum number of warning entities is 30, located inside the worksite
+- The maximum number of workers (e.g. wearing warning devices through FRMCS Equipment) located inside the worksite is 50.
+
+Different groups of workers can work at the same time along the worksite.
+
+Workers or work group can join/leave the worksite based on their locations.
+
+The warning system shall be flexible enough to easily setup.
+
+Energy efficiency of the warning system for battery-powered entities is not supported.
+
+Configuration and control of the warning system shall be available locally.
+
+Configuration and control of the warning system should be available through on-network communication.
+
+Positioning of the train detectors with accurate distance from the worksite is in the scope of the warning system with distance accuracy of +/- 1 meter.
+
+The trackside maintenance warning system communication shall be reliable in tunnels, in bad weather conditions and in unfavourable geographical conditions.
+
+Multiple and flexible use of spectrum bands shall be supported.
+
+### 5.2.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS Users as part of the warning system are authorised to initiate, transmit/receive data and terminate the trackside maintenance warning system communication.
+
+### 5.2.3 Service Flows
+
+The entitled FRMCS User initiate, transmit/receive and terminate the trackside maintenance warning system communication.
+
+A secure data communication application is used for the trackside maintenance warning system communication. The communication requests the QoS class which matches the application category of **XXX** within the FRMCS System.
+
+**Editor's note:** applications categories applicable to Off-Network communications will be an outcome of the present study.
+
+The arbitration is managed by the Arbitration application.
+
+**Editor's note:** the Arbitration application use case in Off-Network mode is FFS in the context of FS\_OFFNETRAIL.
+
+The metadata are recorded by the Data recording application.
+
+**Editor's note:** the Data recording application use case in Off-Network mode is FFS in the context of FS\_OFFNETRAIL.
+
+The communication is secured by the Assured data communication.
+
+**Editor's note:** the Assured data communication use case in Off-Network mode is FFS in the context of FS\_OFFNETRAIL.
+
+The identities, presence and functional addressing is managed by the Role management & presence.
+
+**Editor's note:** the Role management & presence use case in Off-Network mode is FFS in the context of FS\_OFFNETRAIL.
+
+The authorisation of communication is managed by the Authorisation of communication.
+
+**Editor's note:** the Authorisation of communication use case in Off-Network mode is FFS in the context of FS\_OFFNETRAIL.
+
+The authorisation of application is managed by the Authorisation of application.
+
+**Editor's note:** the Authorisation of application use case in Off-Network mode is FFS in the context of FS\_OFFNETRAIL.
+
+The location of the FRMCS Equipment is managed by the Location services.
+
+**Editor's note:** the Location services use case in Off-Network mode is FFS in the context of FS\_OFFNETRAIL.
+
+### 5.2.4 Post-conditions
+
+The entitled FRMCS User(s) as part of the warning system is able to securely exchange data in the appropriate area to intended FRMCS User(s).
+
+### 5.2.5 Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality
+
+TS 22.280 [4], 22.179 [32], 22.281 [5] and 22.282 [6] have a set of specific requirements on Off-Network MCX Services (including MCCoRe and MCData Services for Off-Network).
+
+TS 22.289 [2] has a set of performance requirements for Off-Network communications for Rail to be refined based on outcomes of the present study.
+
+TS 22.261 [7] has no requirement on 5G Proximity Services.
+
+TS 22.185 [8] and 22.186 [9] have a set of specific requirements on 5G Proximity Services to support V2X communications.
+
+### 5.2.6 Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case and gap analysis
+
+#### 5.2.6.1 Requirements related to the Service layer
+
+**Editor's note :** the following potential new MCX requirements are relevant for SA6.
+
+[PR 5.2.6.1-1] The FRMCS System shall be able to initiate data communication for Trackside Maintenance Warning System to FRMCS Users upon a request from a functional identity entitled to initiate such communication.
+
+[PR 5.2.6.1-2] The FRMCS System shall be able to select FRMCS user(s) to deliver the Trackside Maintenance Warning System data based on their functional identity and location either periodically or as a onetime request.
+
+[PR 5.2.6.1-3] The FRMCS System shall allow FRMCS Users to join an ongoing data communication for Trackside Maintenance Warning System based on their functional identity and location.
+
+[PR 5.2.6.1-4] The FRMCS System shall allow FRMCS Users to leave an ongoing data communication for Trackside Maintenance Warning System based on their functional identity and location.
+
+[PR 5.2.6.1-5] The FRMCS System shall be able to terminate data communication for Trackside Maintenance Warning System upon a request received from a functional identity entitled to terminate the communication.
+
+[PR 5.2.6.1-6] The FRMCS System shall allow configuration (e.g. functional identities of maintenance staff and warning entities) and control of the Trackside Maintenance Warning System when the FRMCS Equipment are served by a 3GPP RAT.
+
+[PR 5.2.6.1-7] The FRMCS System shall allow configuration (e.g. functional identities of maintenance staff and warning entities) and control of the Trackside Maintenance Warning System when the FRMCS Equipment are not served by a 3GPP RAT.
+
+#### 5.2.6.2 Requirements related to the Transport layer
+
+**Editor's note : the following potential new requirements are relevant for SA2 and RAN.**
+
+[PR 5.2.6.2-1] The FRMCS System shall support the following traffic characteristics of data transfer for data communication for Trackside Maintenance Warning System:
+
+Note: This table is intended to be aligned with TS 22.289 table 5.2.2-2 [2]
+
+| Scenario | End-to-end latency | Reliability (Note 1) | UE speed | User experience data rate (UL and DL) | Payload size (Note 2) | Area traffic density (UL and DL) | Overall UE density | Communication range (note 6) | Service area dimension (note 3) |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Trackside maintenance warning system Communication | ≤500 ms | 99,9999% (note 7) | Stationary (warning system entities) and pedestrians (workers).
Option: ≤500kmph for train detection via onboard system | 10 kbps up to 500 kbps | Small to medium | Up to 10 Mbps /km | ≤80/worksite | ≥8.5 km along rail tracks including tunnels, bad weather conditions and unfavourable geographical conditions (note 4) | ≥12 km along rail tracks including tunnels, bad weather conditions and unfavourable geographical conditions (note 5) |
+| NOTE 1: Reliability as defined in TS 22.289 sub-clause 3.1. | | | | | | | | | |
+| NOTE 2: Small: payload ≤ 256 octets, Medium: payload ≤512 octets; Large: payload 513 -1500 octets. | | | | | | | | | |
+| NOTE 3: Estimates of maximum dimensions. | | | | | | | | | |
+| NOTE 4: Distance is equal to the distance for train of maximum speed of 500 kmph to enter the worksite + the maximum distance of a worksite | | | | | | | | | |
+| NOTE 5: Minimum distance of the warning zone | | | | | | | | | |
+| NOTE 6: Supported via a single or a combination of 3GPP capabilities of 5GS that best serve these use case in areas with no FRMCS RAN nodes/no FRMCS network coverage. | | | | | | | | | |
+| NOTE 7: Reliability figures could be achieved using multiple 3GPP 5GS-compatible spectrum bands simultaneously. | | | | | | | | | |
+
+**Table 5.2.6.2-1: Traffic characteristics for Trackside Maintenance Warning System**
+
+## 5.3 Remote Control of Engines communications
+
+### 5.3.1 Description
+
+It shall be possible for a remote driver to operate/control an engine (e.g. control movement and speed) of a vehicle typically for shunting operation in depots, shunting yards and/or for banking via a ground-based system or an on-board system located at opposite ends of the engine.
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating the remote control of engines. A train with a locomotive and four cars is shown on the left, moving towards the right. Above the locomotive, a speed limit of 'Max 40 km/h' is indicated. A remote driver, represented by an icon with a smartphone and a hard hat, is shown below the train. Two arrows labeled 'Max 1 000 m' point from the remote driver to the locomotive and to a second locomotive on the right, indicating the maximum range of control. The second locomotive is also shown moving towards the right.
+
+**Figure 5.3.1-1: Description of the Remote Control of Engines**
+
+
+
+A photograph showing a person wearing a blue hard hat and a high-visibility vest standing on a railway track, looking towards a red locomotive in the distance.
+
+
+
+A photograph of a yellow locomotive with a person in a red safety suit standing on its front platform. The locomotive is pulling a series of white cylindrical tank cars.
+
+**Figure 5.3.1-2: Pictures of the Remote Control of Engines in operation**
+
+Onboard system should have a distinct and unambiguous audible or visual warning device that indicates to nearby personnel that the vehicle is under active remote control and subject to movement.
+
+Remote driver/ground-based entity and controlled engine(s)/onboard entity constitute the remote control of engines system that requires secured/safe continuous radio transmission of data between the remote driver and the controlled engine(s) (e.g. keep alive messages for robustness, dynamic speed and brake control, report direction of travel and speed of the vehicle).
+
+A remote driver shall be able to control up to 10 engines but only one engine at a time. To supply sufficient power, a locomotive may consist of one or more engines operated from a single remote driver. In that case, commands from the remote control shall be synchronized. A single onboard system is used to control the engines. Only one communication from the remote driver to the onboard system is required.
+
+A remote driver having the capability to control more than one engine should have a mean to prevent simultaneous control over more than one locomotive.
+
+If on-network mode is available, the remote driver shall be able to exchange data with the traffic control system to automatically operate the track switches to free the tracks before remotely operating the train.
+
+If on-network mode is available, trains have to be geographically tracked by the traffic control system to prevent from traveling past predetermined boundaries (i.e. remote control zones to e.g. avoid other train movements).
+
+If on-network mode is available, the system shall alert the traffic control system when a safety case happens to the remote driver (e.g. remote driver down) including the accurate location of the remote driver.
+
+As an option, real-time video monitoring of tracks from onboard system in the cab or from trackside to the remote driver should be required simultaneously to the transmission of data for remote control of engines.
+
+The remote control of engines is designed to be fail-safe so that if communication is lost the vehicle is brought to a stop automatically.
+
+Due to the fact that very low latency is required, and on-network communication services are not always available at the depot, the FRMCS System provides necessary off-network communication services for the remote control of engines even if on-network communication services are available.
+
+The maximum speed of the train remotely controlled shall be restricted not to exceed 40 kmph.
+
+The remote control of engines shall be flexible enough to easily setup.
+
+Configuration and control of the remote control of engines shall be available locally.
+
+It shall be possible for a remote driver to awaken an onboard entity.
+
+The remote control of engines communication shall be reliable in depots, in tunnels, with clear line of sight.
+
+Multiple and flexible use of spectrum bands shall be supported.
+
+As an option, the remote control application should be used to remotely control by maintenance staff other equipment such as overhead cranes in depots, see below:
+
+
+
+Figure 5.3.1-3: Alternative of Remote Control Application. The image consists of two side-by-side photographs. The left photograph shows a white and red tram or light rail vehicle on a track inside a large industrial building. A yellow overhead crane is visible above the vehicle. The right photograph shows a white and yellow train or tram on a track, also inside a large industrial building. A yellow overhead crane is visible above the vehicle, and a person is standing near the front of the vehicle.
+
+**Figure 5.3.1-3: Alternative of Remote Control Application**
+
+The remote control of overhead cranes has the same requirements on communication characteristics as the remote control of engines.
+
+### 5.3.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The FRMCS User is authorised to initiate, transmit/receive data/video and terminate the remote control of engines communication.
+
+### 5.3.3 Service Flows
+
+The entitled FRMCS User initiate, transmit/receive and terminate the remote control of engines communication.
+
+A secure data communication application is used for the remote control of engines communication. The communication requests the QoS class which matches the application category of **XXX** within the FRMCS System.
+
+**Editor's note:** applications categories applicable to Off-Network communications will be an outcome of the present study.
+
+The arbitration is managed by the Arbitration application.
+
+**Editor's note:** the Arbitration application use case in Off-Network mode is FFS in the context of FS\_OFFNETRAIL.
+
+The metadata are recorded by the Data recording application.
+
+**Editor's note:** the Data recording application use case in Off-Network mode is FFS in the context of FS\_OFFNETRAIL.
+
+The communication is secured by the Assured data communication.
+
+**Editor's note:** the Assured data communication use case in Off-Network mode is FFS in the context of FS\_OFFNETRAIL.
+
+The identities, presence and functional addressing is managed by the Role management & presence.
+
+**Editor's note:** the Role management & presence use case in Off-Network mode is FFS in the context of FS\_OFFNETRAIL.
+
+The authorisation of communication is managed by the Authorisation of communication.
+
+**Editor's note:** the Authorisation of communication use case in Off-Network mode is FFS in the context of FS\_OFFNETRAIL.
+
+The authorisation of application is managed by the Authorisation of application.
+
+**Editor's note:** the Authorisation of application use case in Off-Network mode is FFS in the context of FS\_OFFNETRAIL.
+
+The location of the FRMCS Equipment is managed by the Location services.
+
+**Editor's note:** the Location services use case in Off-Network mode is FFS in the context of FS\_OFFNETRAIL.
+
+### 5.3.4 Post-conditions
+
+The entitled FRMCS User is able to securely exchange data/video in the appropriate area to intended FRMCS User(s).
+
+### 5.3.5 Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality
+
+TS 22.280 [4], 22.179 [3], 22.281 [5] and 22.282 [6] have a set of specific requirements on Off-Network MCX Services (including MCCoRe and MCData Services for Off-Network).
+
+TS 22.289 [2] has a set of performance requirements for Off-Network communications for Rail to be refined based on outcomes of the present study.
+
+TS 22.261 [7] has no requirement on 5G Proximity Services.
+
+TS 22.185 [8] and 22.186 [9] have a set of specific requirements on 5G Proximity Services to support V2X communications.
+
+### 5.3.6 Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case
+
+#### 5.3.6.1 Requirements related to the Service layer
+
+**Editor's note :** the following potential new MCX requirements are relevant for SA6.
+
+[PR 5.3.6.1-1] The FRMCS System shall be able to initiate data communication for Remote Control of Engines to FRMCS User(s) upon a request from a functional identity entitled to initiate such communication.
+
+[PR 5.3.6.1-2] The FRMCS System shall be able to select one or multiple FRMCS user(s) to deliver the Remote Control of Engines data based on their functional identity and location either periodically or as a onetime request.
+
+[PR 5.3.6.1-3] The FRMCS System shall be able to limit the number of FRMCS User(s) to be selected to deliver the Remote Control of Engines data at any one time.
+
+[PR 5.3.6.1-4] An entitled FRMCS User shall be able to awake an FRMCS Equipment.
+
+[PR 5.3.6.1-5] The FRMCS System shall be able to terminate data communication for Remote Control of Engines upon a request received from a functional identity entitled to terminate the communication.
+
+[PR 5.3.6.1-6] The FRMCS System shall allow local configuration (e.g. functional identities of engines and remote drivers) and control of the Remote Control of Engines even when the FRMCS Equipment is served by a 3GPP RAT.
+
+#### 5.3.6.2 Requirements related to the Transport layer
+
+**Editor's note :** the following potential new requirements are relevant for SA2 and RAN.
+
+[PR 5.3.6.2-1] If the FRMCS Equipment is served by a 3GPP RAT, using NR for direct communication for Remote Control of Engines shall not interfere with on-network services.
+
+[PR 5.3.6.2-2] The FRMCS System shall support the following traffic characteristics for communication for Remote Control of Engines:
+
+Note: This table is intended to be aligned with TS 22.289 table 5.2.2-2 [2]
+
+| Scenario | End-to-end latency | Reliability (Note 1) | UE speed | User experience data rate (UL and DL) | Payload size (Note 2) | Area traffic density (UL and DL) | Overall UE density | Communication range (note 4) | Service area dimension (note 3) |
+|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Remote control of engines data communication | ≤10 ms | 99,9999% (note 4) | Stationary (trackside remote driver) and ≤40kmph (onboard remote control system and onboard remote driver) | 100 kbps up to 1 Mbps | Small to Medium | Up to 100 Mbps/s/km | 2 (remote driver and onboard system) | ≤1000m along rail tracks including depots and tunnels with clear line of sight | ≤2000m along rail tracks including depots and tunnels with clear line of sight |
+| Remote control of engines video communication | ≤100 ms | 99,9% (note 4) | Stationary (trackside remote driver) and ≤40kmph (onboard remote control system and onboard remote driver) | 10 Mbps | Medium | Up to 1 Gbps/km | 2 (remote driver and onboard system) | ≤1000m along rail tracks including depots and tunnels with clear line of sight | ≤2000m along rail tracks including depots and tunnels with clear line of sight |
+
+NOTE 1: Reliability as defined in TS 22.289 sub-clause 3.1.
+NOTE 2: Small: payload ≤ 256 octets, Medium: payload ≤512 octets; Large: payload 513 -1500 octets.
+NOTE 3: Estimates of maximum dimensions.
+NOTE 4: Supported via a single or a combination of 3GPP capabilities of 5GS that best serve these use case in areas with no FRMCS RAN nodes/no FRMCS network coverage.
+NOTE 5: Reliability figures could be achieved using multiple 3GPP 5GS-compatible spectrum bands simultaneously
+
+**Table 5.3.6.2-1: Traffic characteristics for Remote Control of Engines**
+
+## 5.4 Train integrity monitoring data communication
+
+### 5.4.1 Description
+
+The Train Integrity is an on-board function responsible for verifying the completeness of a train composition, while the train is in operation, to guarantee safety on tracks. Train integrity consists concretely in monitoring the status of the train's tail to check that last wagon is regularly advancing in a coherent way in relation to the movement of the remaining train. The event of accidental train separation constitutes a serious danger for the next train, being a possible unexpected obstacle on the line, and therefore it needs to be promptly reported to the rail signalling system.
+
+The main difference between train integrity monitoring in on-network mode and off-network mode consists in train integrity criteria that (1) is based on communication liveliness in on-network mode, whereas (2) requires verifying train tail coherent movement respect to front cabin, based on train tail odometry data (i.e. position, speed or acceleration of train tail and front cabin) in off-network mode. In fact, off-network communication between train tail and front cabin could be present also after train splitting with limited distance of separated waggons.
+
+### 5.4.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The On-board Train Integrity (OTI) entities (i.e. the FRMCS Users) are authorised to initiate Train Integrity Monitoring Data Communication.
+
+### 5.4.3 Service Flows
+
+James is the lead driver of a cargo train of 1 000 metres long with 50 wagons that are not fully equipped with power supply.
+
+The front cabin, the train tail wagon and, optionally some or all of the intermediate wagons to offer more flexibility in train composition, are equipped with On-board Train Integrity (OTI) entities connected to UEs in off-network mode at the lower part of the wagons (i.e. no direct line-of-sight between OTI entities). UEs may not be dedicated to On-board Train Integrity.
+
+James powers on the front cabin before starting to operate the train. The OTI entities establish communications with each other and begin exchanging status (i.e. position, speed or acceleration information, and if supported wagon diagnostic information) via the connected UEs in off-network mode. The train integrity status is “Confirmed” (all wagons connected and operational). The Train Integrity system shall avoid pairing James’ OTI entities with other trains’ OTI entities in proximity.
+
+Train Integrity data exchanges are encrypted to prevent eavesdropping.
+
+Train Integrity data exchanges are recorded in case something bad happens (e.g. wrong pairing between OTI entities) and somebody wants to review the incident later.
+
+James starts running its train to its destination on non-electrical lines where there is no network coverage. The Train Integrity Monitoring procedure restarts every 30 seconds (configurable timer) until the train stops running.
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating train integrity confirmation. A train is shown moving to the right, indicated by a blue arrow labeled 'Trains direction'. The train consists of several wagons. The front wagon (OTI1) is labeled 'James: Lead Driver #1' and has a green box representing the 'Onboard Signalling System'. The rear wagon (OTI3) is labeled 'OTI3'. A yellow curved arrow connects OTI1 and OTI3, labeled 'Distance D1 = Max. 1 000m'. A yellow box above the front wagon contains the text 'Train integrity confirmed'. A timeline at the bottom is labeled 'Time T1'. A legend at the bottom left shows a yellow square for 'Onboard Train Integrity entity' and a green square for 'Onboard Signalling System'.
+
+**Figure 5.4.3-1: Train integrity confirmed**
+
+For some reason, the train tail splits off of James’ train. The Train Integrity system detects the event and the train integrity status becomes “Lost”.
+
+In the meantime, James is communicating with its train operating centre to prepare its next mission. The Train Integrity system informs on-board signalling system about train integrity status. The on-board signalling system takes priority on James ongoing communication to inform him thus allowing him to intervene rapidly and appropriately (e.g. reducing the speed and breaking the train in a safe location).
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating a train integrity loss scenario. A train is shown moving from left to right, indicated by a blue arrow labeled 'Trains direction'. The train consists of several cars, with three Onboard Train Integrity (OTI) entities labeled OTI1, OTI2, and OTI3. OTI1 is at the front (right side), OTI2 is in the middle, and OTI3 is at the rear (left side). A red 'X' is placed between OTI3 and the next car, indicating a separation. A red callout box labeled 'Train integrity lost' points to the front of the train, with the text 'James: Lead Driver #1'. A yellow arc connects OTI1 and OTI3, with a distance label 'Distance D2 = Min. 2 x D1 = 2 000m'. A timeline at the bottom left shows 'Time T1 + T2'. A legend at the bottom left indicates that yellow squares represent 'Onboard Train Integrity entity' and green squares represent 'Onboard Signalling System'.
+
+**Figure 5.4.3-2: Train integrity lost**
+
+### 5.4.4 Post-conditions
+
+Train integrity status can be continuously exchanged between On-board Train Integrity (OTI) entities to warn accidental train separation and avoid any rail safety issue.
+
+### 5.4.5 Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality
+
+TS 22.280 [4], 22.179 [3], 22.281 [5] and 22.282 [6] have a set of specific requirements on Off-Network MCX Services (including MCCoRe and MCData Services for Off-Network).
+
+TS 22.289 [2] has a set of performance requirements for Off-Network communications for Rail to be refined based on outcomes of the present study.
+
+TS 22.261 [7] has no requirement on 5G Proximity Services.
+
+TS 22.185 [8] and 22.186 [9] have a set of specific requirements on 5G Proximity Services to support V2X communications.
+
+### 5.4.6 Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case
+
+#### 5.4.6.1 Requirements related to the Service layer
+
+[PR 5.4.6.1-1] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall be able to initiate data communication for Train Integrity Monitoring to relevant FRMCS Users upon a request from a functional identity entitled to initiate such communication.
+
+[PR 5.4.6.1-2] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall provide the necessary communication means to support Train Integrity Monitoring.
+
+[PR 5.4.6.1-3] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall allow arbitration for Train Integrity Monitoring communication.
+
+[PR 5.4.6.1-4] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall allow FRMCS Users to join an ongoing data communication for Train Integrity Monitoring based on their functional identity and location.
+
+[PR 5.4.6.1-5] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall allow FRMCS Users to leave an ongoing data communication for Train Integrity Monitoring based on their functional identity and location.
+
+[PR 5.4.6.1-6] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall provide means to obtain and exchange odometry information of FRMCS Users (e.g. position, speed or acceleration).
+
+[PR 5.4.6.1-7] When an FRMCS Equipment in Off-Network mode is simultaneously used by multiple FRMCS Users, each of the FRMCS Users shall be individually addressable.
+
+[PR 5.4.6.1-8] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall be able to terminate data communication for Train Integrity Monitoring upon a request received from a functional identity entitled to terminate such communication.
+
+[PR 5.4.6.1-9] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall provide the means to record Train Integrity Monitoring data communication and communication related information (e.g. FRMCS Users involved) to an external system.
+
+[PR 5.4.6.1-10] The FRMCS Service Security Framework shall provide mechanisms in Off-Network mode to cover identity management, authentication, authorisation and data protection in respect to Train Integrity Monitoring.
+
+#### 5.4.6.2 Requirements related to the Transport layer
+
+[PR 5.4.6.2-1] The FRMCS Equipment power consumption in Off-Network mode shall be minimised.
+
+[PR 5.4.6.2-2] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall support the following traffic characteristics of data transfer for direct data communication for Train Integrity Monitoring:
+
+Note: This table is intended to be aligned with TS 22.289 table 5.2.2-2 [2]
+
+| Scenario | End-to-end latency | Reliability (Note 1) | UE speed | User experienced data rate (UL and DL) | Payload size (Note 2) | Area traffic density (UL and DL) | Overall UE density | Communication range (Note 3) | Service area dimension (Note 4) |
+|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-----------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Train integrity monitoring data Communication | ≤1 s | 99,9% | ≤350k mph | 10 kbps up to 500 kbps | Small to Medium | Up to 25 Mbps /km | ≤50/train | ≤2 km along rail tracks including tunnels, bad weather conditions and unfavourable geographical conditions
(Note 5)
(Note 6) | ≤2 km along rail tracks including tunnels, bad weather conditions and unfavourable geographical conditions
(Note 5)
(Note 6) |
+| | NOTE 1: Reliability as defined in TS 22.289 sub-clause 3.1.
NOTE 2: Small: payload ≤ 256 octets, Medium: payload ≤512 octets; Large: payload 513 -1500 octets.
NOTE 3: Supported via a single or a combination of 3GPP capabilities of 5GS that best serve these use case in areas with no FRMCS RAN nodes/no FRMCS network coverage.
NOTE 4: Estimates of maximum dimensions.
NOTE 5: Distance is equal to twice the maximum length of a train to cover train tail split
NOTE 6: Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) between UEs shall be supported. | | | | | | | | |
+
+**Table 5.4.6.2-1: Traffic characteristics for Train Integrity Monitoring**
+
+## 5.5 Shunting communication
+
+### 5.5.1 Description
+
+Changing the locomotive of a train, coupling/uncoupling wagons, changing the order in which wagons are arranged in a train are all kinds of shunting movements. Shunting movements can be differentiated from other regular movements: this main point of differentiation is that almost all shunting is done within a single station or a shunting yard.
+
+Shunting movements between shunting members can be ordered by radio, in on-network or in off-network modes. This section describes shunting communications in off-network mode where a ground user e.g. controller/dispatcher is not necessary.
+
+### 5.5.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The Shunting members (i.e. the FRMCS Users) of the shunting team #1 (i.e. Shunting Service Area #1 and Shunting Team ID #1) are authorised to initiate Shunting Communications.
+
+### 5.5.3 Service Flows
+
+A cargo train has to be prepared by coupling the main locomotive to the rest of the wagons. A Shunting Service Area is defined to avoid any other train movements in the same area. There is no network coverage in this Shunting service area.
+
+Bob has been assigned the role of the shunting leader of a shunting team in charge of this operation. Bob prepares its mission together with James, which has been assigned the role of the shunting driver. The shunting team members are all equipped with a Shunting device connected to a UE. They are operating their UEs in off-network mode and have selected their role and shunting service area to enable voice and data exchanges between the shunting members. The Shunting group voice and data communications are encrypted to prevent eavesdropping.
+
+Bob exchanges with the shunting members secured and reliable information required to perform safe shunting movements of trains, (e.g. issuing route requests, route confirmation, giving driving commands, confirmation for driving commands, etc.). Bob receives confirmation upon successful reception of the message for all shunting members.
+
+Service Flow#1 (shunting movements ordered by human): James, located in the front cabin (indoor) and without direct line-of-sight of the track, pushes a group of wagons (i.e. going backwards), continuously and securely ordered by Bob, located at train tail (outdoor or indoor) as a lookout man. To do so, Bob enables an assured safety link function that periodically send tones or keep alive messages to the shunting members. Bob may shout orders periodically into his Shunting device. Bob's orders take priority on the periodic assured safety link tones and every team member is able to hear him.
+
+If the voice/data can not be exchanged for more than 2 seconds (configurable time), every member of the shunting team is informed, thus allowing them to intervene rapidly and appropriately (e.g. James breaking the train).
+
+When Bob orders James to stop its train, he disables the assured safety link function and invites Dave, a member of another shunting team located on the trackside, to be part of their shunting team to couple James' train to the rest of the wagons. Shunting team members of both teams are now part of the same shunting team.
+
+Dave, James and Bob are simultaneously talking to each other to couple James' train safely.
+
+Dave notices that another worker is in the area and, to avoid collision with James' train shouts a warning into his UE. Dave's warning takes priority, and member of the shunting team is able to hear him to intervene rapidly and appropriately (e.g. James breaking the train).
+
+Shunting communications are recorded (e.g. shunting members composition) in case something bad happens and somebody wants to review the incident later.
+
+Service Flow#2 (shunting movements self-controlled using video by the driver): James, located in the front cabin (indoor) and without direct line-of-sight of the track, pushes a group of wagons (i.e. going backwards), continuously and securely monitoring the track using video communication with camera connected to a UE located at the train tail.
+
+If the video can not be exchanged for more than 2 seconds (configurable time), James is informed, thus allowing him to intervene rapidly and appropriately (e.g. James braking the train).
+
+Shunting video communications are recorded (including metadata e.g. timestamp, originator, receiver, roles) in case something bad happens and somebody wants to review the incident later.
+
+
+
+Figure 5.5.3-1: Examples of Shunting communications. The diagram illustrates a 'Rail Shunting Yard' with multiple tracks. Track 1 (top) is 'Shunting Service area#1', marked with a red 'DANGER' sign. It shows a Shunting Member (purple) and a Shunting Leader (blue) communicating, with a distance indicator '10m...5m...'. A train is moving from right to left, indicated by a blue arrow labeled 'Train direction'. Track 2 (middle) has a 'Metallic structure'. Track 3 (bottom) is 'Shunting Service area#2', marked with a yellow 'BIP...BIP...' sign. It shows a Shunting Driver (green) and a Shunting Leader (blue) communicating. A train is moving from left to right, indicated by a blue arrow labeled 'Train direction'. A 'Building' is shown on the right side of the yard. A legend at the bottom identifies the icons: Shunting Leader (blue), Shunting Driver (green), Shunting Member (purple), and Shunting device (yellow).
+
+**Figure 5.5.3-1: Examples of Shunting communications**
+
+### 5.5.4 Post-conditions
+
+Shunting movement orders can be continuously exchanged between the Shunting members of the shunting team to avoid any rail safety issue while shunting.
+
+Shunting videos can be continuously exchanged between the Driver and the shunting cameras to avoid any rail safety issue while shunting.
+
+### 5.5.5 Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality
+
+TS 22.280 [4], 22.179 [3], 22.281 [5] and 22.282 [6] have a set of specific requirements on Off-Network MCX Services (including MCCoRe and MCData Services for Off-Network).
+
+TS 22.289 [2] has a set of performance requirements for Off-Network communications for Rail to be refined based on outcomes of the present study.
+
+TS 22.261 [7] has no requirement on 5G Proximity Services.
+
+TS 22.185 [8] and 22.186 [9] have a set of specific requirements on 5G Proximity Services to support V2X communications.
+
+### 5.5.6 Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case
+
+#### 5.5.6.1 Requirements related to the Service layer
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-1] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall be able to initiate voice, data and video communication for Shunting movements to relevant FRMCS Users upon a request from a functional identity entitled to initiate such communication.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-2] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall provide the necessary communication means to support Shunting.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-3] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall allow the multi-talker control.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-4] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall provide the means to enable/disable continuous monitoring of the communication links to all involved FRMCS Users of a specific voice, data or video group communication.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-5] An authorised FRMCS User in Off-Network mode shall be able to enable/disable continuous monitoring of the communication links to all involved FRMCS Users of a specific voice, data or video group communication.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-6] If a degradation or loss of a communication link is detected, the remaining FRMCS Users shall be informed. The ongoing communications among the remaining FRMCS Users shall continue.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-7] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall allow arbitration for Shunting communication.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-8] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall allow FRMCS Users to join an ongoing voice and data communication for Shunting based on their functional identity and location.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-9] An authorised FRMCS User shall be able to invite another FRMCS User to join a voice communication, based on his functional identity, FRMCS User Identity, or FRMCS Equipment Identity, even if he is already involved in another active communication.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-10] When accepting a communication invitation, in case the FRMCS User has an active voice communication, the FRMCS User shall be able to leave, terminate or merge the voice communication(s).
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-11] The FRMCS User sending the invitation shall be informed if the targeted FRMCS User receives, accepts, rejects or ignores the invitation.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-12] All involved FRMCS User shall be informed when group communication status of an FRMCS user changes e.g. join, leave, on hold, terminate, invite, merge.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-13] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall allow FRMCS Users to leave an ongoing voice and data communication for Shunting based on their functional identity and location.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-14] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall be able to terminate voice, data and video communication for Shunting upon a request received from a functional identity entitled to terminate such communication.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-15] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall provide the means to record Shunting communication and communication related information (e.g. FRMCS Users involved and their roles) to an external system.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.1-16] The FRMCS Service Security Framework shall provide mechanisms in Off-Network mode to cover identity management, authentication, authorisation and data protection in respect to Shunting.
+
+#### 5.5.6.2 Requirements related to the Transport layer
+
+[PR 5.5.6.2-1] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall not interfere with FRMCS Services in On-Network mode.
+
+[PR 5.5.6.2-2] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall support the following traffic characteristics of voice, data and video transfer for direct communication for Shunting:
+
+Note: this table is intended to be aligned with TS 22.289 table 5.2.2-2 [2]
+
+| Scenario | End-to-end latency | Reliability (Note 1) | UE speed | User experience data rate (UL and DL) | Payload size (Note 2) | Area traffic density (UL and DL) | Overall UE density | Communication range (Note 3) | Service area dimension (Note 4) |
+|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|----------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Shunting voice Communication | ≤100 ms | 99,9999% | ≤40 kmph | 100 kbps up to 300 kbps | Small | Up to 1 Mbps/line km | ≤10 shunting members | ≤1.5 km along rail tracks including tunnels, bad weather conditions and unfavourable geographical conditions
(Note 5) | ≤1.5 km along rail tracks including tunnels, bad weather conditions and unfavourable geographical conditions
(Note 5) |
+| Shunting data Communication | ≤500 ms | 99,9999% | ≤40 kmph | 10 kbps up to 500 kbps | Small to medium | Up to 10 Mbps/km | ≤10 shunting members | ≤1.5 km along rail tracks including tunnels, bad weather conditions and unfavourable geographical conditions
(Note 5) | ≤1.5 km along rail tracks including tunnels, bad weather conditions and unfavourable geographical conditions
(Note 5) |
+| Shunting video Communication | ≤100 ms | 99,9% | ≤40 kmph | 10 Mbps | Medium | Up to 100 Mbps/km | ≤10 | ≤1.5 km along rail tracks including tunnels, bad weather conditions and unfavourable geographical conditions
(Note 5) | ≤1.5 km along rail tracks including tunnels, bad weather conditions and unfavourable geographical conditions
(Note 5) |
+| | NOTE 1: Reliability as defined in TS 22.289 sub-clause 3.1.
NOTE 2: Small: payload ≤ 256 octets, Medium: payload ≤512 octets; Large: payload 513 -1500 octets.
NOTE 3: Supported via a single or a combination of 3GPP capabilities of 5GS that best serve these use case in areas with no FRMCS RAN nodes/no FRMCS network coverage.
NOTE 4: Estimates of maximum dimensions.
NOTE 5: Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) between UEs, UE to UE both inside locomotives and unfavourable radio propagation conditions in shunting yards shall be supported. | | | | | | | | |
+
+**Table 5.5.6.2-1: Traffic characteristics for Shunting communications**
+
+## 5.6 Train ready for departure communication
+
+### 5.6.1 Description
+
+Station departure and the platform/train interface is one of the biggest risk areas in railway operations today.
+
+Rail operators implement various different processes for managing station departure with similar objective of ensuring that passengers are safely onboard the train and that the train can safely depart the platform.
+
+Train departure communications includes (1) driver to controller communication and (2) conductor to driver communication. Train ready message sent from the driver to the controller is typically used in main railway stations, in on-network mode. Train ready for departure from a platform involving platform staff (e.g. chief conductor) and driver sent from the platform staff to the driver, is typically used in remote station e.g. rural area, in off-network mode. Another train ready for departure communication scenario in remote stations involves the driver and platform camera(s) to check closing doors and that no passengers are left on the platform without any platform staff.
+
+This section describes Train ready for departure communications in off-network mode. No service handover between on-network and off-network modes is foreseen.
+
+### 5.6.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The Chief conductor (i.e. the FRMCS User) is authorised to initiate Train ready for departure Communications.
+
+### 5.6.3 Service Flows
+
+Monday, 9:30 in the morning. James has been assigned the role of the lead driver of train #12345. His train #12345 stands in platform A, located in a rural railway station where there is no network coverage. The train is ready for boarding. His train should leave at 10:00. James is located in the front cabin (indoor).
+
+Service Flow#1 (driver and platform staff): Bob has been assigned the role of the chief conductor in charge of ensuring a safe boarding for passengers. He stands in platform A, near the train tail.
+
+James and Bob are equipped with devices connected to a UE. They are operating their UEs in off-network mode and have selected their role and platform area to enable data exchanges between each other. The data communications are encrypted to prevent eavesdropping.
+
+Passengers are boarding.
+
+09:59. Train is ready for departure but Bob notes that a Family is running not to miss train #12345. 10:03. All passengers are onboard. Doors are closing. When all doors are safely closed, Bob sends a secured and reliable “Train #12345 is ready for departure” message to James. Bob receives confirmation upon successful reception of the message by James. James acknowledges the message and starts running his train.
+
+Train ready for departure message is recorded (e.g. timestamp, originator, receiver, roles, content) in case something bad happens and somebody wants to review the incident later.
+
+Service Flow#2 (driver and platform camera(s)): two fixed cameras are located on platform A. Camera C1 is located one near the train tail, camera C2 is located at the front cabin. Each camera is connected to a UE operating in off-network mode. Each camera has automatically selected its role and platform area (via static or dynamic configuration) to enable video exchanges with the driver’s UE. The video communication is encrypted to prevent eavesdropping.
+
+Passengers are boarding.
+
+09:59. Train is ready for departure, but a Family is running not to miss train #12345. 10:03. All passengers are onboard. James enables video from camera C1 to check passengers on the platform. Then James switch video from camera C1 to C2. James may also enable video from both cameras C1 and C2. Doors are closing. When all doors are safely closed, James disable videos from cameras C1 and C2. James starts running his train.
+
+Train ready for departure video is recorded (including metadata e.g. timestamp, originator, receiver) in case something bad happens and somebody wants to review the incident later.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows a rural station with two platforms, Platform A and Platform B. A train is stopped at Platform A. A Chief Conductor (blue icon) is on Platform A, and a Lead Driver (green icon) is in the front cabin of the train. A yellow speech bubble from the Chief Conductor contains the text "Train ready for departure". An orange arrow points from the Chief Conductor to the Lead Driver, representing the communication. A blue arrow indicates the train's direction. A legend at the bottom identifies the icons: Chief Conductor (blue), Lead Driver (green), and UE (yellow).
+
+Diagram illustrating the train ready for departure communications scenario at a rural station.
+
+**Figure 5.6.3-1: Train ready for departure communications**
+
+### 5.6.4 Post-conditions
+
+Train ready for departure messages are safely exchanged between the Chief Conductor and the Lead Driver to avoid any safety related issue for passengers before departure.
+
+Train ready for departure videos are safely exchanged between the Chief Conductor and the Fixed Cameras to avoid any safety related issue for passengers before departure.
+
+### 5.6.5 Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality
+
+TS 22.280 [4], 22.179 [3], 22.281 [5] and 22.282 [6] have a set of specific requirements on Off-Network MCX Services (including MCCoRe and MCData Services for Off-Network).
+
+TS 22.289 [2] has a set of performance requirements for Off-Network communications for Rail to be refined based on outcomes of the present study.
+
+TS 22.261 [7] has no requirement on 5G Proximity Services.
+
+TS 22.185 [8] and 22.186 [9] have a set of specific requirements on 5G Proximity Services to support V2X communications.
+
+### 5.6.6 Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case
+
+#### 5.6.6.1 Requirements related to the Service layer
+
+[PR 5.6.6.1-1] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall be able to initiate data and video communications for Train Ready for Departure to relevant FRMCS User upon a request from a functional identity entitled to initiate such communication.
+
+[PR 5.6.6.1-2] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall provide the necessary communication means to support Train Ready for Departure.
+
+[PR 5.6.6.1-3] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall allow arbitration for Train Ready for Departure communication.
+
+[PR 5.6.6.1-4] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall be able to terminate data and video communications for Train Ready for Departure upon a request received from a functional identity entitled to terminate such communication.
+
+[PR 5.6.6.1-5] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall provide the means to record Train Ready for Departure communication and communication related information (e.g. FRMCS Users involved and their roles) to an external system.
+
+[PR 5.6.6.1-6] The FRMCS Service Security Framework shall provide mechanisms in Off-Network mode to cover identity management, authentication, authorisation and data protection in respect to Train Ready for Departure.
+
+#### 5.6.6.2 Requirements related to the Transport layer
+
+[PR 5.6.6.2-1] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall support the following traffic characteristics of data and video transfer for direct communication for Train Ready for Departure:
+
+Note: This table is intended to be aligned with TS 22.289 table 5.2.2-2 [2]
+
+| Scenario | End-to-end latency | Reliability (Note 1) | UE speed | User experience data rate (UL and DL) | Payload size (Note 2) | Area traffic density (UL and DL) | Overall UE density | Communication range (Note 3) | Service area dimension (Note 4) |
+|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|------------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Train Ready for Departure data Communication | ≤500 ms | 99,9% | Stationary | 10 kbps up to 500 kbps | Small to medium | Up to 10 Mbps /km | 2 | ≤1 000 m along rail tracks including bad weather conditions
(Note 5) | ≤1 000 m along rail tracks including bad weather conditions
(Note 5) |
+| Train Ready for Departure video Communication | ≤100 ms | 99,9% | Stationary | 10 Mbps | Medium | Up to 100 Mbps /km | ≤10 | ≤1 000 m along rail tracks including bad weather conditions
(Note 5) | ≤1 000 m along rail tracks including bad weather conditions
(Note 5) |
+| | NOTE 1: Reliability as defined in TS 22.289 sub-clause 3.1.
NOTE 2: Small: payload ≤ 256 octets, Medium: payload ≤512 octets; Large: payload 513 -1500 octets.
NOTE 3: Supported via a single or a combination of 3GPP capabilities of 5GS that best serve these use case in areas with no FRMCS RAN nodes/no FRMCS network coverage.
NOTE 4: Estimates of maximum dimensions.
NOTE 5: Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) between UEs and UE to UE inside locomotives shall be supported. | | | | | | | | |
+
+**Table 5.6.6.2-1: Traffic characteristics for Train Ready for Departure communication**
+
+## 5.7 Autonomous Train Control and Operation
+
+### 5.7.1 Description
+
+This section describes autonomous train control and operation in off-network mode, where no network is available. In legacy train control systems, trains typically decide its movement by interacting with trackside devices (e.g. track circuits, balise, radio block system) or communicating with a trackside server. If a train can autonomously figure out the positions of the nearby trains and decide its movement authority, the transport capacity of the railway will be enhanced. In the autonomous train control system whose service concept is aligned to the eV2X service, trains share its position by exchanging the information without any centralized server, and each train decides how far it can be authorized to move based on the position information. It is expected that main application area will be mass transportation such as subway.
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating an autonomous train control scenario. The diagram is split into two parts by a large arrow pointing from left to right. The left part shows a traditional setup where a train (consisting of a locomotive and several cars) is on a track. Above the track, there are two boxes labeled 'EI' and 'ATP'. The 'EI' box is connected to the train and has arrows pointing to the 'ATP' box, labeled 'position' and 'path'. The 'ATP' box is connected to a 'Point machine' on the track. The right part shows an autonomous setup where the train is on the track, and there is a box labeled 'Object controller' above the track. The train is connected to the 'Object controller' by a dashed line, and the 'Object controller' is connected to the 'Point machine' on the track. The train is also connected to another train on the track by a dashed line, representing communication between trains.
+
+**Figure 5.7.1-1 An example of autonomous train control scenario**
+
+### 5.7.2 Pre-conditions
+
+1. Trains know the overall schedule, and the user equipment of each train is connected to the user equipment of the other trains operating at the same time in on-network mode. If on-network mode is not available, the user equipment is connected to the user equipment of other trains in proximity using off-network mode.
+2. A user equipment of each train is able to establish a connection with the object controller for the nearby point machine, where the point machine is a trackside element.
+
+### 5.7.3 Service Flows
+
+1. A train gets started and try registration to the currently operating trains. As a result of the registration, every train positions are known before running.
+2. The train gets the responses of the registration from the other trains and estimates the positions of the trains.
+3. The train decides its movement authority based on the position information and starts moving.
+4. The train positions in the corresponding areas are shared through broadcasting or multicasting. Here, the train position information is updated in a periodic manner.
+5. Based on the periodically updated information, each train updates its movement authority and conduct train control based on it.
+6. If the train needs to connect to the nearby point machine, the train sends switch command with a reliable mechanism in the application layer.
+
+### 5.7.4 Post-conditions
+
+The autonomous train control is achieved by activating movement authority for each train or activating object controller for nearby point machine.
+
+### 5.7.5 Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality
+
+The potential new requirement in the followings have been considered only in TR 22.989 V18.0.0.
+
+### 5.7.6 Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case
+
+#### 5.7.6.1 Requirements related to the Service layer
+
+[PR 5.7.6.1-1] The FRMCS System shall provide a reliable mechanism to discover a FRMCS UEs in proximity in off-network.
+
+[PR 5.7.6.1-2] The FRMCS System shall be able to share the train position periodically from one single UE to multiple FRMCS UEs in proximity for train control in off-network.
+
+[PR 5.7.6.1-3] The FRMCS System shall be able to transmit train control data originated from one FRMCS UE to another FRMCS UE in off-network.
+
+#### 5.7.6.2 Requirements related to the Transport layer
+
+[PR 5.7.6.2-1] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall support the following traffic characteristics of data transfer for direct communication for autonomous train control and operation:
+
+| Scenario | End-to-end latency | Reliability (Note 1) | UE speed | User experienced data rate (UL and DL and SL) | Payload size (Note 2) | Area traffic density (UL and DL and SL) | Overall UE density | Communication range | Service area dimension (Note 3) |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Autonomous train control and operation data communication (Korea, urban railway) | ≤100 ms | 99.99 % | ≤100 km/h | ≤1 Mbps | Small to large | ≤5 Mbps/km | ≤15 (3000 m) | ≤3000 m (Note 5) | ≤3000 m along rail tracks including bad weather conditions (Note 4) |
+| | NOTE 1: Reliability as defined in TS 22.289 sub-clause 3.1.
NOTE 2: Small: payload ≤ 256 octets, Medium: payload ≤512 octets; Large: payload 513 -1500 octets.
NOTE 3: Estimates of maximum dimensions.
NOTE 4: Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) between UEs shall be supported.
NOTE 5: UEs are assumed to be located at the tail of the leading train and the front of the following train | | | | | | | | |
+
+**Table 5.7.6.2-1: Traffic characteristics for autonomous train control and operation communication – off network communication**
+
+Note: This table is intended to be included in Section 6.2.2.3-1 of TS 22.289 [2]
+
+## 5.8 Virtual Coupling
+
+### 5.8.1 Description
+
+One of the important missions that the future railway service should achieve is to increase its transport capacity. A straight-forward solution is to minimize the distance between successive trains so that train interval is reduced. It is difficult to do so in a legacy train control system, because the successive trains need to have distance as much as a safety margin, which should be larger than the full braking distance.
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating Virtual Coupling between two trains, T1 and T2. Train T1 is the leading train and Train T2 is the following train. Above the trains, a horizontal blue double-headed arrow indicates the communication range. Below the trains, a dashed blue line represents the 'Present speed' profile of T1, and a solid orange line represents the 'Speed profile of T1'. Another dashed blue line represents the 'Speed profile of T2'. The diagram shows T1 and T2 moving towards the right, with T1 slightly ahead of T2. The speed profiles indicate that T1 is decelerating while T2 is maintaining a constant speed, and the system aims to shorten the safety margin between them.
+
+**Figure 5.8.1-2 Sharing acceleration and braking control information to shorten safety margin**
+
+This safety margin can be further shortened if the successive trains share control information (acceleration and braking) and apply it to its own train control. As shown in Figure 5.8.1-1, the safety margin can be shortened if the following train (T1) immediately knows that the leading train (T2) starts braking and also triggers braking. This is the fundamental principle and the main purpose of virtual coupling. Figure 5.8.2 shows the basic concept of the virtual coupling scenario. Multiple trains which are in close distance move together as they are physically coupled. As the distance between two trains gets smaller, the control information of a train should be delivered to the other in shorter time.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the concept of a virtual train set. At the top, a long horizontal double-headed arrow is labeled "Virtual Train Set". Below it, three trains labeled T1, T2, and T3 are shown on a track, each moving to the right as indicated by yellow arrows. Each train has a "Lock" icon above it. Vertical arrows with radio signal icons connect each train to the "Virtual Train Set" arrow. The entire group of trains and their connections is enclosed in a light blue rounded rectangle.
+
+Diagram of virtual train set concept showing three trains T1, T2, and T3 with locks, connected to a 'Virtual Train Set' via radio signals.
+
+Figure 5.8.1-2 The concept of virtual coupling scenario
+
+### 5.8.2 Pre-conditions
+
+- 1. The leading and following trains in operation recognize each other and have just got configured to be coupled virtually. Here, the recognition is achieved by on-network or off-network.
+- 2. The user equipments for train control support device to device communications in the perspective of transport layer.
+
+
+
+This diagram shows the overall procedure of virtual coupling in three stages. The top stage shows two trains, T1 and T2, on a track with yellow arrows pointing right. A dashed orange line with radio signal icons connects them, and a long horizontal double-headed arrow is above them. The middle stage is similar, but the dashed orange line is more defined. The bottom stage shows the trains closer together, with a yellow circle highlighting the gap. A "Lock" icon is placed over this gap, and a dashed orange double-headed arrow is between the trains. A long horizontal double-headed arrow remains above them.
+
+Three-part diagram showing the overall procedure of virtual coupling between trains T1 and T2, including initial state, connection establishment, and locked state.
+
+Figure 5.8.1-3 Overall procedure of virtual coupling
+
+### 5.8.3 Service Flows
+
+1. The following train begins to approach to the leading train by exchanging the information about their position. The two trains, which are far enough to allow a certain amount of end-to-end latency, are initially connected through the on-network.
+2. As the following train approaches to the leading train, they start exchanging the information about movement control and each train then controls itself while considering the control of the other train. The two trains, which are still far enough to allow a certain amount of end-to-end latency, keep the connection through the on-network.
+3. As the following train further approaches to the leading train, the safe braking distance gets shorter and they are required to have a connection of which end-to-end latency is very short for delicate train control. At this moment, they seamlessly switch the connection from the on-network to off-network. Each train can maintain the on-network connection, as an auxiliary connection, as long as it is within the coverage.
+4. As the following train even further approaches the leading train so that the distance between the tail-end of the leading train and the front-end of the following train becomes shorter than the safe braking distance, the off-network connection requires extremely high reliability as well as short end-to-end latency to prevent potential accidents. In this case, two trains can be regarded as if they are physically coupled, communicating via wireless train backbone (WLTB).
+
+### 5.8.4 Post-conditions
+
+For safety train operation, integrity needs to be checked for train control information delivery in the perspective of application or transport layer. Any error on integrity check shall be immediately reported to the train control application.
+
+### 5.8.5 Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality
+
+The potential new requirement in the followings have been considered only in TR 22.989 V18.0.0.
+
+### 5.8.6 Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case
+
+#### 5.8.6.1 Requirements related to the Service layer
+
+Note: Off-network is used even when network coverage is available.
+
+[PR 5.8.6.1-1] The FRMCS system shall be able to provide integrity protection for off-network train control communication.
+
+[PR 5.8.6.1-2] The FRMCS System shall support seamless service continuity between on-network based connection and off-network based connection
+
+[PR 5.8.6.1-3] The FRMCS System shall support UEs capable of utilizing off-network and on-network communications at the same time.
+
+[PR 5.8.6.1-4] The FRMCS System shall provide a mechanism to change the QoS requirements of the off-network communication adaptively.
+
+#### 5.8.6.2 Requirements related to the Transport layer
+
+[PR 5.8.6.2-1] The FRMCS system shall be able to provide integrity protection for off-network train control communication
+
+[PR 5.8.6.2-2] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall support the following traffic characteristics of data transfer for direct communication for virtual coupling:
+
+Note: This table is intended to be included in Section 6.2.2.3-1 of TS 22.289 [2]
+
+| Scenario | End-to-end latency | Reliability (Note 1) | UE speed | UE Relative Speed | User experienced data rate (UL and DL and SL) | Payload size (Note 2) | Area traffic density (UL and DL and SL) | Overall UE density | Communication range | Service area dimension (Note 3) |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-----------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Virtual coupling, critical data communication on (Korea, urban railway) | ≤ 100 ms | 99.99% | ≤100 km/h | ≤ 50km/h | ≤1Mbps | Small to large | ≤5 Mbps/km | ≤15 (3000 m) | ≤3000 m (Note 6) | ≤3 000 m along rail tracks including bad weather conditions |
+| Virtual coupling, Very critical data communication on (Korea, urban railway) (Note 5) | ≤ 10 ms | 99.9999 % | ≤100 km/h | ≤ 50km/h | ≤1Mbps | Small to large | ≤20 Mbps/km | ≤6 (300 m) | ≤ 300 m (Note 6) | ≤300 m along rail tracks including bad weather conditions (Note 4) |
+| | NOTE 1: Reliability as defined in TS 22.289 sub-clause 3.1.
NOTE 2: Small: payload ≤ 256 octets, Medium: payload ≤512 octets; Large: payload 513 -1500 octets.
NOTE 3: Estimates of maximum dimensions.
NOTE 4: Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) between UEs shall be supported.
NOTE 5: Data link between trains can work as like wireless train backbone
NOTE 6: UEs are assumed to be located at the tail of the leading train and the front of the following train | | | | | | | | | |
+
+**Table 5.8.6.2-1: Traffic characteristics for Virtual coupling communication**
+
+[PR 5.8.6.2-3] The FRMCS System shall establish an immediate communication session between entities for virtual coupling.
+
+**Editor's note: The requirement above is FFS**
+
+[PR 5.8.6.2-4] The FRMCS System shall support seamless service continuity between on-network based connection and off-network based connection.
+
+**Editor's note: The requirement above is FFS**
+
+[PR 5.8.6.2-5] The FRMCS System shall support UEs capable of utilizing off-network and on-network communications at the same time.
+
+**Editor's note: The requirement above is FFS**
+
+## 5.9 Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communication
+
+### 5.9.1 Description
+
+Monitoring and controlling critical infrastructure such as train detection, signals and indicators, movable infrastructure, level crossing elements, including barrier controls, vehicle sensors, lighting controls and alarms, are essential part of operating trains in areas where no network is available e.g. rural areas, harbours.
+
+Monitoring and controlling critical infrastructure can be done by radio, in on-network or in off-network modes. This section describes monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communications in off-network mode, where no network is available. No service handover between on-network and off-network modes is foreseen.
+
+### 5.9.2 Pre-conditions
+
+The Chief conductor (i.e. the FRMCS User) is authorised to initiate Monitoring or controlling critical infrastructure communications.
+
+### 5.9.3 Service Flows
+
+Monday, 9:30 in the morning. James has been assigned the role of the lead driver of train #12345. His train #12345 stands in platform A, located in a Harbour railway station where there is no network coverage. The train is ready for boarding and starts running at 10:00. James is located in the front cabin (indoor).
+
+Before leaving the Harbour area, James has to run its train through many level crossings. In order to run safely the level crossing (LX), James has to detect vehicles in the level crossing area using fixed video camera of this area.
+
+James is equipped with an onboard device with display connected to a UE. LX surveillance camera is also connected to a UE. James and the camera are operating their UEs in off-network mode and have selected their role to enable video exchanges. The video communications are encrypted to prevent eavesdropping.
+
+When James approaching the LX, James enables video from LX surveillance camera to detect vehicles. James primarily relies on the remote LX surveillance camera vision to identify obstacles (e.g. vehicles) and to make decision on whether to enter the LX area. When no vehicles are detected, James is allowed to run its train through the LX area. When the train has left the LX area, James disable videos from LX surveillance camera. James continues running his train to next LX.
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating the monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communications at a level crossing (LX). A train is shown moving from left to right, indicated by a blue arrow labeled 'Train direction'. The train is approaching a level crossing where a car is stopped behind a barrier. A yellow box labeled 'Trackside LX train detector' is positioned on the tracks. A yellow arrow points from the detector to a camera labeled 'LX surveillance camera' mounted on a pole. Another yellow arrow points from the camera to a blue box labeled 'LX controller' located near the barrier. The barrier is red and white striped.
+
+**Figure 5.9.3-1: Monitoring and control of critical infrastructure communications**
+
+### 5.9.4 Post-conditions
+
+Monitoring and controlling critical infrastructure videos are safely exchanged between the Chief Conductor and the Fixed Cameras to avoid any safety related issue at level crossings.
+
+### 5.9.5 Existing features partly or fully covering the use case functionality
+
+TS 22.280 [4], 22.179 [3], 22.281 [5] and 22.282 [6] have a set of specific requirements on Off-Network MCX Services (including MCCoRe and MCData Services for Off-Network).
+
+TS 22.289 [2] has a set of performance requirements for Off-Network communications for Rail to be refined based on outcomes of the present study.
+
+TS 22.261 [7] has no requirement on 5G Proximity Services.
+
+TS 22.185 [8] and 22.186 [9] have a set of specific requirements on 5G Proximity Services to support V2X communications.
+
+### 5.9.6 Potential New Requirements needed to support the use case
+
+#### 5.9.6.1 Requirements related to the Service layer
+
+[PR 5.9.6.1-1] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall be able to initiate video communications for Monitoring and controlling critical infrastructure to relevant FRMCS User upon a request from a functional identity entitled to initiate such communication.
+
+[PR 5.9.6.1-2] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall provide the necessary communication means to support Monitoring and controlling critical infrastructure.
+
+[PR 5.9.6.1-3] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall allow arbitration for Monitoring and controlling critical infrastructure.
+
+[PR 5.9.6.1-4] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall be able to terminate video communications for Monitoring and controlling critical infrastructure upon a request received from a functional identity entitled to terminate such communication.
+
+[PR 5.9.6.1-5] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall provide the means to record Monitoring and controlling critical infrastructure communication and communication related information (e.g. FRMCS Users involved and their roles) to an external system.
+
+[PR 5.9.6.1-6] The FRMCS Service Security Framework shall provide mechanisms in Off-Network mode to cover identity management, authentication, authorisation and data protection in respect to Monitoring and controlling critical infrastructure.
+
+#### 5.9.6.2 Requirements related to the Transport layer
+
+[PR 5.9.6.2-1] The FRMCS Service in Off-Network mode shall support the following traffic characteristics of video transfer for direct communication for Monitoring and controlling critical infrastructure:
+
+Note: this table is intended to be aligned with TS 22.289 table 5.2.2-2 [2]
+
+| Scenario | End-to-end latency | Reliability (Note 1) | UE speed | User experience data rate (UL and DL) | Payload size (Note 2) | Area traffic density (UL and DL) | Overall UE density | Communication range (Note 3) | Service area dimension (Note 4) |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|----------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Monitoring and controlling critical infrastructure video Communication | ≤100 ms | 99,9% | ≤40 km/h | 10 Mbps | Medium | Up to 20 Mbps/km | 2 | ≤1 000 m along rail tracks including bad weather conditions
(Note 5) | ≤1 000 m along rail tracks including bad weather conditions
(Note 5) |
+| | NOTE 1: Reliability as defined in TS 22.289 sub-clause 3.1.
NOTE 2: Small: payload ≤ 256 octets, Medium: payload ≤512 octets; Large: payload 513 -1500 octets.
NOTE 3: Supported via a single or a combination of 3GPP capabilities of 5GS that best serve these use case in areas with no FRMCS RAN nodes/no FRMCS network coverage.
NOTE 4: Estimates of maximum dimensions.
NOTE 5: Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) between UEs and UE to UE inside locomotives shall be supported. | | | | | | | | |
+
+**Table 5.9.6.2-1: Traffic characteristics for Monitoring and controlling critical infrastructure communication**
+
+# --- 6 Void.
+
+## 6.1 Void.
+
+# --- 7 Void.
+
+## 7.1 Void.
+
+# --- 8 Identified issues
+
+## 8.1 Introduction
+
+This section summarizes open points identified by SA1 as part of the gap analysis of the use cases captured above, e.g. about limitations, missing requirements and gaps in existing functionalities supported by 3GPP.
+
+## 8.2 Identified issue 1: Communication range
+
+### 8.2.1 Description
+
+Some of the use cases described in clauses 5, 6 and 7 of the present document (e.g. the Trackside Maintenance Warning System communication) require communication range of up to several kilometres (e.g. 8.5 km) along rail tracks including tunnels, bad weather conditions, unfavourable geographical conditions, and non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) between UEs i.e. obstructions.
+
+Communication range is to be understood as the maximum distance between users operating UEs without performance degradations. Users may be stationary, pedestrians or in motion up to 500 kmph.
+
+### 8.2.2 Limitations, missing requirements and gaps
+
+
+
+## 8.3 Identified issue 2: MCX Support
+
+### 8.x.1 Description
+
+Some of the use cases described in clauses 5, 6 and 7 of the present document (refer to subclauses describing requirements to the Service layer) require support of MCX Services.
+
+The following MCX capabilities should be supported by Off-Network for Rail.
+
+Due to the nature of Off-Network communication, it is expected that the functionality of those MCX capabilities might be reduced compared to On-Network communication.
+
+- MCX Service common capabilities:
+ - Group communications,
+ - Private communications,
+ - Late Communication Entry,
+
+- Functional Alias,
+- Location Service,
+- E2E Security,
+- User Authentication and Service Authorization,
+- Service Arbitration,
+- QoS and Priority,
+- Performance Monitoring and Exposure Service,
+- Recording Metadata,
+- Transition from Off-Network to On-Network (and vice-versa) (i.e. Service Continuity),
+- Service Configuration (i.e. local + central when transiting from Off-Network to On-Network),
+- MCX Service Types:
+ - MCPTT,
+ - MCData,
+ - MCVideo.
+- MCX Service capabilities per Service Type:
+ - MCPTT
+ - Floor Control,
+ - Multi-Talker Control.
+ - MCData
+ - SDS,
+ - IP Connectivity.
+ - MCVideo
+ - Video Streams.
+
+### 8.x.2 Limitations, missing requirements and gaps
+
+
+
+## 8.x Identified issue y:
+
+### 8.x.1 Description
+
+
+
+### 8.x.2 Limitations, missing requirements and gaps
+
+
+
+# --- 9 Consolidated potential requirements
+
+# --- 10 Conclusion and recommendations
+
+This technical report identifies several use cases, and potential new requirements for 5GS support of Rail Off-Network. Some open points identified as part of the gap analysis of the use cases have been collected and detailed in clause 8 (e.g., communication range, MCX support).
+
+A further step is necessary to identify limitations, missing requirements and gaps in existing functionalities supported by 3GPP before any potential normative work. This step could be performed by external bodies involved in the definition of Rail Off-Network use cases (e.g., UIC, ETSI TC RT).
+
+It is therefore recommended to wait for further gap analysis before finalizing consolidated requirements in this TR and trigger potential subsequent normative work (if deemed necessary).
+
+# Annex A: Change history
+
+| Change history | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------|----------|-----------|----|-----|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|-------------|
+| Date | Meeting | TDoc | CR | Rev | Cat | Subject/Comment | | New version |
+| 2020-09 | SA1#91-e | S1-203281 | | | | TR Skeleton for Study on Off-Network for Rail | | 0.0.0 |
+| 2020-09 | SA1#91-e | S1-203254 | | | | FS_OFFNETRAIL TR 22.990 Introduction | | 0.1.0 |
+| 2020-09 | SA1#91-e | S1-203355 | | | | FS_OFFNETRAIL TR 22.990 Scope | | 0.1.0 |
+| 2020-09 | SA1#91-e | S1-203256 | | | | FS_OFFNETRAIL TR 22.990 Overview | | 0.1.0 |
+| 2020-09 | SA1#91-e | S1-203257 | | | | FS_OFFNETRAIL TR 22.990 Chapter 5 | | 0.1.0 |
+| 2020-09 | SA1#91-e | S1-203258 | | | | FS_OFFNETRAIL TR 22.990 Chapter 6 | | 0.1.0 |
+| 2020-09 | SA1#91-e | S1-203259 | | | | FS_OFFNETRAIL TR 22.990 Chapter 7 | | 0.1.0 |
+| 2020-09 | SA1#91-e | S1-203328 | | | | FS_OFFNETRAIL TR 22.990 Key Issues | | 0.1.0 |
+| 2020-09 | SA1#91-e | S1-203329 | | | | FS_OFFNETRAIL TR 22.990 UC Trackside Maintenance Warning System | | 0.1.0 |
+| 2020-09 | SA1#91-e | S1-203330 | | | | FS_OFFNETRAIL TR 22.990 UC Remote Control of Engines | | 0.1.0 |
+| 2020-09 | SA1#91-e | S1-203385 | | | | Incorporated all agreed contributions to TR 22.990 at SA1#91e | | 0.1.0 |
+| 2020-11 | SA1#92-e | S1-204035 | | | | Introduce "Train integrity monitoring data communication" use case | | 0.2.0 |
+| 2020-11 | SA1#92-e | S1-204036 | | | | Introduce "Shunting communication" use case | | 0.2.0 |
+| 2020-11 | SA1#92-e | S1-204037 | | | | Introduce "Train ready for departure communication" use case | | 0.2.0 |
+| 2020-11 | SA1#92-e | S1-204413 | | | | Autonomous Train Control and Operation: Moving Authority Perspective | | 0.2.0 |
+| 2020-11 | SA1#92-e | S1-204414 | | | | Virtual Coupling Use Case | | 0.2.0 |
+| 2020-11 | SA1#92-e | S1-204148 | | | | Identified issue: Communication range | | 0.2.0 |
+| 2021-03 | SA1#93-e | S1-210228 | | | | Enhance "Train ready for departure communication" use case with video | | 0.3.0 |
+| 2021-03 | SA1#93-e | S1-210230 | | | | Enhance "Shunting communication" use case with video | | 0.3.0 |
+| 2021-03 | SA1#93-e | S1-210427 | | | | New "Monitoring and Control of Critical Infrastructure communication" use case | | 0.3.0 |
+| 2021-03 | SA1#93-e | S1-210428 | | | | Off-Net Railways Update to sec.8 | | 0.3.0 |
+| 2021-03 | SA1#93-e | S1-210429 | | | | Add "MCX Support" as an identified issue to be solved by 3GPP technology as required by Off-Network for Rail | | 0.3.0 |
+| 2021-03 | SA1#93-e | S1-210430 | | | | Enhancement of "Virtual coupling" use case | | 0.3.0 |
+| 2021-03 | SA1#93-e | S1-210240 | | | | Do not exclude any single or a combination of 3GPP capabilities to support Rail Off-Network use cases | | 0.3.0 |
+| 2021-03 | SA1#93-e | S1-210244 | | | | Request for clarification on relationship between TR 22.990 and TS 22.289 QoS scenarios and traffic characteristics | | 0.3.0 |
+| 2021-09 | SA1#95-e | S1-213292 | | | | Updates to "Virtual coupling" use case | | 0.4.0 |
+| 2021-09 | SA1#95-e | S1-213293 | | | | Updates to "Autonomous train control and operation" use case | | 0.4.0 |
+| 2021-09 | SA1#95-e | S1-213294 | | | | Updates to "Conclusion and Recommendations" clause | | 0.4.0 |
+| 2021-09 | SA#93e | SP-211043 | | | | Raised to v.1.0.0 for presentation for information | | 1.0.0 |
+| 2021-11 | SA1#96-e | S1-214031 | | | | Global clean up to remove unnecessary clauses | | 1.1.0 |
+| 2021-11 | SA1#96-e | S1-214032 | | | | Clean up of references | | 1.1.0 |
+| 2021-12 | SA#94e | SP-211504 | | | | Raised to v.2.0.0 for presentation for approval | | 2.0.0 |
+| 2021-12 | SA#94e | SP-211504 | | | | Raised to v.18.0.0 following SA#94e's approval | | 18.0.0 |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/16c1175b5f05a4b55e6d396fc51b15b3_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/16c1175b5f05a4b55e6d396fc51b15b3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..847b9bd569abbf80716455c525ccf4baa2a09f8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/16c1175b5f05a4b55e6d396fc51b15b3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c1d67d7a6f813eb6b875b35c8cf6622ef9694be61334617c2ea42b660b743edd
+size 54305
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bcfe5d2d6a391aa958fcabc8430ab5afd99d52e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9755410aa1361e1dca8998ebdb2d5c90e8fda9518b7ae67c77c9442011e81c52
+size 9200
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..248fdcfd81c8742d7ccfe78b179f98d62f269470
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6414a0765a8c4ca4d92c242268dbf81a6b7454b63f33b1197d4fb2e1edd35033
+size 5171
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/a33da0f14e456f92539ce3e9b7d81f9a_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/a33da0f14e456f92539ce3e9b7d81f9a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b5c59c8909b17428617749bc53b0017f0385bf93
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/a33da0f14e456f92539ce3e9b7d81f9a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c5c941424e29e853c6aff4399ce688a7114a54dfb0d70f03a1a97fdf011881da
+size 40356
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/a7c51c18111139f9aca2805114108565_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/a7c51c18111139f9aca2805114108565_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1c746947d1ec18febc07620c0b0130def1f899b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/a7c51c18111139f9aca2805114108565_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:334dae35ab9732e290ebc0c6ddeab2f20c53068ee4e1fbf0cc691b57b620fe5a
+size 65883
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/b3baf3a29b67c7425d2562ddbc52f0cc_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/b3baf3a29b67c7425d2562ddbc52f0cc_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..85efe170cf5ee82d7fb8de2225c25320ec3f4676
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/b3baf3a29b67c7425d2562ddbc52f0cc_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b57f294903d52ae50f5035b330a411d6bcb6287b0b65dd1a6171ed95f3ee2abc
+size 38554
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/c0e88e4bd3a209b66ee7cb67e1cec2be_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/c0e88e4bd3a209b66ee7cb67e1cec2be_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d94d9eed6595498adab79aec6632c271feab29a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/c0e88e4bd3a209b66ee7cb67e1cec2be_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:46348033a64704e4ceec4b63cb5c43025629411afb08f86f43e93276e07e4335
+size 55413
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/c2fc2621e8206d24427b56bcb2398fc0_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/c2fc2621e8206d24427b56bcb2398fc0_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..38a980fef4db2ed62391d7afa84d88e9e9f5ceab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/c2fc2621e8206d24427b56bcb2398fc0_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:95a8852a2917e531cdd4d6c8cc37f0c4d2376d6ce3d4dd9265fcebe2817d16e9
+size 52553
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/cb4cfa42ce34febde7bdb882f3fc3094_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/cb4cfa42ce34febde7bdb882f3fc3094_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..16200eb922d95fb06e359c0764e0a4ec01770bfe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/cb4cfa42ce34febde7bdb882f3fc3094_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:39d6191356c9af437e17da745ce4085a359e203fc4df0169f473230108081a8f
+size 17875
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/d0abac95583b52a3b35f74a215567334_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/d0abac95583b52a3b35f74a215567334_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a864fce3d04d8b6758d9d16069e70617dd7b5035
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/d0abac95583b52a3b35f74a215567334_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:77f103064db98198f08edf67e8e7b625445e43db480858c7d7466d7c642410e9
+size 58578
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/dbe553cf16dd14073b89a8263a428664_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/dbe553cf16dd14073b89a8263a428664_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..96109f40e51268e2a3b59827fa2e1a9e9537ae46
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/dbe553cf16dd14073b89a8263a428664_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:03d41829843b9c0c1e19b179184b074e9d65f07e590c867db982e1d70ca0cebc
+size 56801
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..51e4bed714bdb79cd0edd224e9dcea0e3f517db8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b04d75c839c89f39e3dfe3c23bdaf4f5d53a8ea43bc76342a1688e1acc666e68
+size 42919
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/raw.md b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c6ca030678b420e5553ca30b9b8d59378e6f11a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32130/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,693 @@
+
+
+# 3GPP TS 32.130 V18.1.0 (2023-12) ---
+
+*Technical Specification*
+
+## **3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Network sharing; Concepts and requirements (Release 18)**
+
+
+
+---
+
+The logo for 5G Advanced, featuring a stylized '5G' with a green signal wave icon above the 'G' and the word 'ADVANCED' in smaller letters to the right.
+
+5G Advanced logo
+
+
+
+The 3GPP logo, consisting of the letters '3GPP' in a stylized font with a red signal wave icon below the 'P', and the text 'A GLOBAL INITIATIVE' underneath.
+
+3GPP logo
+
+## --- **Keywords**
+
+---
+
+Network sharing, Management, 3GPP
+
+## **3GPP**
+
+## --- **Postal address**
+
+## --- **3GPP support office address**
+
+---
+
+650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis
+Valbonne - FRANCE
+Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16
+
+## --- **Internet**
+
+---
+
+
+
+## --- **Copyright Notification**
+
+---
+
+No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.
+The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
+
+© 2023, 3GPP Organizational Partners (ARIB, ATIS, CCSA, ETSI, TSDSI, TTA, TTC).
+All rights reserved.
+
+UMTSTM is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its members
+3GPP™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
+LTE™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
+GSM® and the GSM logo are registered and owned by the GSM Association
+
+# Contents
+
+| | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|
+| Foreword ..... | 4 |
+| Introduction ..... | 4 |
+| 1 Scope..... | 5 |
+| 2 References..... | 5 |
+| 3 Definitions and abbreviations ..... | 5 |
+| 3.1 Definitions..... | 5 |
+| 3.2 Abbreviations ..... | 6 |
+| 4 Concepts and background ..... | 7 |
+| 4.1 RAN sharing scenarios..... | 7 |
+| 4.2 Management architecture ..... | 9 |
+| 5 Business level requirements..... | 10 |
+| 5.1 Requirements..... | 10 |
+| 5.1.1 Requirements for the OAM&P of shared RAN ..... | 10 |
+| 5.1.2 Requirements for the OA&M of shared core network elements ..... | 11 |
+| 5.1.3 Requirements for the management of measurements for cross-operator accounting based on data volume and QoS ..... | 11 |
+| 5.1.4 Requirements for management support for NG-RAN MOCN network sharing scenario with same Cell Identity broadcast..... | 12 |
+| 5.1.5 Requirements for management support for NG-RAN MOCN network sharing scenario with multiple Cell Identity broadcast..... | 12 |
+| 5.1.6 Requirements for the OAM&P of shared NG-RAN ..... | 12 |
+| 5.2 Actor roles ..... | 13 |
+| 5.3 Telecommunications resources ..... | 13 |
+| 5.4 High-level use cases..... | 13 |
+| 5.4.1 Fully pooled radio resources between two POPs ..... | 13 |
+| 5.4.2 Alarm raised on a shared cell (MOCN scenario) ..... | 14 |
+| 5.4.3 Single DM for managing S-RAN and POP own RAN..... | 15 |
+| 5.4.4 Management of measurements for cross-operator accounting based on data volume and QoS ..... | 15 |
+| 5.4.5 Management support for the mixed deployment scenario of shared NG-RAN network elements and non-shared NG-RAN network elements ..... | 15 |
+| 5.4.6 Radio resources partitioning between two POPs for the shared NG-RAN ..... | 16 |
+| 6 Specification level requirements..... | 17 |
+| 6.1 Requirements..... | 17 |
+| 6.2 Actor roles ..... | 17 |
+| 6.3 Telecommunications resources ..... | 17 |
+| 6.4 Use cases ..... | 17 |
+| 6.4.1 Management of measurements for cross-operator accounting based on data volume and QoS ..... | 17 |
+| 7 Management workflows for requirements for the management of the shared NG-RAN NE(s) in MOCN network sharing scenario ..... | 18 |
+| 7.1 Management of the shared NG-RAN NE(s) in MOCN network sharing scenario with the same cell Identity broadcast ..... | 18 |
+| 7.2 Management of the shared NG-RAN NE(s) in MOCN network sharing scenario with the multiple cell Identity broadcast ..... | 19 |
+| Annex A (informative): Network sharing agreement ..... | 21 |
+| Annex B (informative): Change history ..... | 22 |
+
+# --- Foreword
+
+This Technical Specification has been produced by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).
+
+The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within the TSG and may change following formal TSG approval. Should the TSG modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by the TSG with an identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows:
+
+Version x.y.z
+
+where:
+
+- x the first digit:
+ - 1 presented to TSG for information;
+ - 2 presented to TSG for approval;
+ - 3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control.
+- y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections, updates, etc.
+- z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document.
+
+# --- Introduction
+
+Network sharing is emerging as a mechanism for operators to substantially and sustainably improve network costs and to efficiently utilize network capacity. The traditional model of single ownership of all network layers and elements is being challenged and more and more operators are adopting network sharing as a means of cutting the heavy costs involved in initial roll-out, capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operational expenditure (OPEX).
+
+In general, an increasing number of operators are sharing their mobile networks. Main arguments presented are:
+
+- Increased rollout speed.
+- Quickly expanding coverage to meet customer demand for wider coverage.
+- Sharing low traffic areas.
+- Sharing high license burdens.
+- Lower CAPEX and OPEX.
+
+Network sharing has some major implications on the operations of the network. Alignment on operational priorities, common network planning/evolution strategy, sharing end user data/subscriber data, sharing performance data, alarms etc. in the shared network need to be considered carefully. Privacy, security and competitive information are also important for the operations of a shared network.
+
+# --- 1 Scope
+
+The present document describes concepts and high-level requirements for the Operations, Administration, Maintenance and Provisioning (OAM&P) of network sharing.
+
+Network sharing scenarios considered in the present document are Multiple Operator Core Network (MOCN) and Gateway Core Network (GWCN) for GERAN, UTRAN and E-UTRAN, as defined in TS 23.251 [7] , and Multiple Operator Core Network (MOCN) for NG-RAN as defined in TS 23.501[7].
+
+# --- 2 References
+
+The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present document.
+
+- References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or non-specific.
+ - For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.
+ - For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document *in the same Release as the present document*.
+- [1] 3GPP TR 21.905: "Vocabulary for 3GPP Specifications".
+- [2] 3GPP TS 32.101: "Telecommunication management; Principles and high level requirements".
+- [3] 3GPP TS 32.102: "Telecommunication management; Architecture".
+- [4] 3GPP TS 36.300: "Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) and Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); Overall description; Stage 2".
+- [5] 3GPP TS 23.251: "Network sharing; Architecture and functional description".
+- [6] 3GPP TS 36.314: "Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Layer 2 – Measurements"
+- [7] 3GPP TS 23.501: "System architecture for the 5G System (5GS); Stage2".
+- [8] 3GPP TS 28.541: "Management and orchestration; 5G Network Resource Model (NRM); Stage 2 and stage 3".
+- [9] 3GPP TS 28.552: "Management and orchestration; 5G performance measurements".
+
+# --- 3 Definitions and abbreviations
+
+## 3.1 Definitions
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the terms and definitions given in TS 32.101 [2], TS 32.102 [3] and TR 21.905 [1] and the following apply. A term defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same term, if any, in TS 32.101 [2], TS 32.102 [3] and TR 21.905 [1], in that order.
+
+Organizational roles:
+
+**Master Operator (MOP):** In Radio Access Network (RAN) and/or Core Network (CN) sharing scenarios, deployment and daily operation of shared network elements are entrusted to a single Actor, called the Master Operator. The Master
+
+Operator provides network and OAM&P services to other Operators, called Participating Operators (POPs). The Master Operator is the only one to have a direct OAM&P connection from its Domain Manager (DM) to the shared network elements.
+
+**Participating Operator (POP):** Participating Operators are service providers who share, alongside other Participating Operators, the network (RAN and/or CN) facilities provided by the Master Operator. According to TS 36.300 [4] up to 6 operators can share a RAN.
+
+NOTE: In a RAN/CN sharing scenario where Company A and Company B are POPs, MOP represents a role which can be played by either:
+
+- Company A or Company B: in that case, Company A or Company B plays both roles, i.e. is the MOP and one of the POPs simultaneously, or
+- A joint-venture between Company A and Company B, or
+- A third-party entity: in this context, third party is referring to a wholesale mobile connectivity provider.
+
+In the two latter cases, companies A and B rely on another company to play the role of MOP. This company cannot play the role of POP.
+
+Management systems:
+
+**Master Operator Network Manager (MOP-NM):** Network Manager enabling the Master Operator to manage the shared RAN and/or shared CN.
+
+**Master Operator Shared CN DM (MOP-SC-DM):** Domain Manager enabling the Master Operator to manage the Shared CN.
+
+**Master Operator Shared RAN DM (MOP-SR-DM):** Domain Manager enabling the MOP to manage the Shared RAN.
+
+**Participating Operator CN DM (POP-CORE-DM):** Domain Manager enabling a Participating Operator to manage its own (not shared) Core Network.
+
+**Participating Operator Network Manager (POP-NM):** Network Manager enabling a Participating Operator to manage its own (not shared) network and its portion of the shared network.
+
+**Participating Operator RAN DM (POP-RAN-DM):** Domain Manager enabling a Participating Operator to manage its own (not shared) RAN.
+
+Managed resources in a shared Radio Access Network (RAN) environment:
+
+**Shared RAN (S-RAN):** A set of Radio Access Network elements shared among Participating Operators.
+
+Managed resources in a shared Core Network (CN) environment:
+
+**Shared CN (S-CORE):** A set of Core Network elements shared among Participating Operators. It may or may not include all core network elements. For example, the Participating Operators may share only the MMEs while having independent S/P GWs.
+
+## 3.2 Abbreviations
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the abbreviations given in TR 21.905 [1] and the following apply. An abbreviation defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same abbreviation, if any, in TR 21.905 [1].
+
+| | |
+|-----|-----------------------------------|
+| ARP | Allocation and Retention Priority |
+| DL | Downlink |
+
+| | |
+|-------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
+| DM | Domain Manager |
+| GBR | Guaranteed Bit Rate |
+| GWCN | Gateway Core Network |
+| MDT | Minimization of Drive Tests |
+| MOCN | Multiple Operator Core Network |
+| MOP | Master Operator |
+| MOP-NM | Master Operator Network Manager |
+| MOP-SC-DM | Master Operator Shared CN DM |
+| MOP-SR-DM | Master Operator Shared RAN DM |
+| NGCOR | Next Generation Converged Operations Requirements |
+| OAM&P | Operations, Administration, Maintenance and Provisioning |
+| POP | Participating Operator |
+| POP-CORE-DM | Participating Operator CN DM |
+| POP-NM | Participating Operator Network Manager |
+| POP-RAN-DM | Participating Operator RAN DM |
+| QCI | Quality of Service Class Indicator |
+| QoS | Quality of Service |
+| SON | Self-Organizing Networks |
+| S-CORE | Shared CN |
+| S-RAN | Shared RAN |
+| UL | Uplink |
+
+# --- 4 Concepts and background
+
+## 4.1 RAN sharing scenarios
+
+Various network sharing scenarios exist, amongst which one category is RAN sharing which can be divided into the following (non exhaustive) list of sub-categories:
+
+- Passive RAN sharing, also known as infrastructure sharing (including site sharing).
+- Active RAN sharing, where active network elements of the RAN are shared:
+ - RAN-only sharing (MOCN; see TS 23.251 [5] and TS 23.501 [7]), i.e. BTSs / BSCs (respectively NodeBs / RNCs and eNodeBs) in a 2G Radio Access Network (respectively a 3G Radio Access Network and an E-UTRA network) , and gNBs in a 5G NR network;
+ - Gateway Core Network (GWCN; see TS 23.251 [5]), in which not only the Radio Access Network elements are shared but also part or all of the Core Network elements (there is no passive core network sharing).
+
+The following figures depict the MOCN scenarios:
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates an E-UTRAN MOCN network sharing scenario. At the top, two clouds represent the core networks for 'Participating Operator A' and 'Participating Operator B'. Each cloud contains two boxes labeled 'MME' and 'S/P-GW'. Below the core networks, the RAN is divided into three zones: 'Op A owned zone', 'Shared zone', and 'Op B owned zone'. The 'Op A owned zone' contains two 'eNB' (evolved NodeB) icons and is associated with 'PLMN A'. The 'Shared zone' contains two 'eNB' icons and is associated with both 'PLMN A' and 'PLMN B'. The 'Op B owned zone' contains two 'eNB' icons and is associated with 'PLMN B'. Lines connect the 'MME' and 'S/P-GW' in Operator A's core network to the eNBs in the Op A owned zone and the Shared zone. Similarly, lines connect the 'MME' and 'S/P-GW' in Operator B's core network to the eNBs in the Shared zone and the Op B owned zone.
+
+Diagram of E-UTRAN MOCN network sharing scenario showing two operators (A and B) sharing a common radio access network (RAN) with eNBs and core network elements (MME, S/P-GW).
+
+Figure 4.1-1: E-UTRAN MOCN network sharing scenario
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates an NG-RAN MOCN Network Sharing scenario with the same cell identity broadcast. At the top, two clouds represent the core networks for 'Participating Operator A' and 'Participating Operator B'. Each cloud contains two boxes labeled '5GC NF(s)'. Below the core networks, the RAN is divided into three zones: 'Op A owned zone', 'Shared zone', and 'Op B owned zone'. The 'Op A owned zone' contains two 'gNB' (next-generation NodeB) icons and is associated with 'PLMN A'. The 'Shared zone' contains two 'gNB' icons and is associated with both 'PLMN A' and 'PLMN B'. The 'Op B owned zone' contains two 'gNB' icons and is associated with 'PLMN B'. Lines connect the '5GC NF(s)' in Operator A's core network to the gNBs in the Op A owned zone and the Shared zone. Similarly, lines connect the '5GC NF(s)' in Operator B's core network to the gNBs in the Shared zone and the Op B owned zone.
+
+Diagram of NG-RAN MOCN Network Sharing with same cell identity broadcast scenario, showing two operators (A and B) sharing a common radio access network (RAN) with gNBs and 5GC NF(s).
+
+Figure 4.1-2: NG-RAN MOCN Network Sharing with same cell identity broadcast scenario
+
+
+
+Diagram of NG-RAN MOCN Network Sharing with multiple cell identity broadcast scenario. It shows two core networks, 'Participating Operator A Core Network' and 'Participating Operator B Core Network', each containing two '5GC NF(s)' blocks. These are connected to three zones: 'Op A owned zone' (with PLMN A and two gNBs), 'Shared zone' (with PLMN A, NR cell A, TAC A, PLMN B, NR cell B, TAC B and two gNBs), and 'Op B owned zone' (with PLMN B and two gNBs).
+
+Figure 4.1-3 NG-RAN MOCN Network Sharing with multiple cell identity broadcast scenario
+
+In GWCN, besides sharing Radio Access Network nodes, the POPs also share Core Network nodes (see TS 23.251 [5] – clause 4.1).
+
+
+
+Diagram of GateWay Core Network (GWCN). It shows two core networks, 'Participating Operator A Core Network' and 'Participating Operator B Core Network', each containing an 'MME' and an 'S-/P-GW'. These are connected to three zones: 'Op A owned zone' (with PLMN A and two eNBs), 'Shared zone' (with PLMN A, PLMN B and two eNBs), and 'Op B owned zone' (with PLMN B and two eNBs). The 'S-/P-GW' and 'MME' are shared across the zones, with the 'MME' being centrally located in the shared zone.
+
+Figure 4.1-4: GateWay Core Network (GWCN)
+
+## 4.2 Management architecture
+
+The management architecture for MOCN is depicted in figure 4.2-1. It is compliant with 3GPP management reference model (TS 32.101 [2]).
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the management architecture for MOON. At the top, there are two stacks of boxes labeled 'POP-NM' and 'MOD-NM'. Below these, a dashed horizontal line represents the 'Itf-N' interface. Below the interface, there are three boxes: 'POP-RAN-DM', 'MOP-SR-DM', and 'POP-RAN-DM'. The 'MOP-SR-DM' box is connected to the 'MOD-NM' and 'MOP-NM' boxes above it. Below each 'POP-RAN-DM' box is a box labeled 'MSC/SGSN/HLR/MME/HSS'. Below each 'MSC/SGSN/HLR/MME/HSS' box is a box labeled 'BTS/BSC/RNC/(e)NodeB'. Below the 'MOP-SR-DM' box is a box labeled 'S-RAN (BTS/BSC/RNC/(e)NodeB)'. At the bottom, there are three labels: 'NEs owned by Participating Operator A (MCC 1, MNC 1)' under the left 'BTS/BSC/RNC/(e)NodeB', 'NEs owned by Master Operator and shared between POs' under the 'S-RAN', and 'NEs owned by Participating Operator B (MCC 1, MNC 2)' under the right 'BTS/BSC/RNC/(e)NodeB'.
+
+Management architecture for MOON diagram showing POP-NM, MOD-NM, MOP-NM, POP-RAN-DM, MOP-SR-DM, MSC/SGSN/HLR/MME/HSS, and BTS/BSC/RNC/(e)NodeB connected via Itf-N interface.
+
+Figure 4.2-1: Management architecture for MOON
+
+In the MOON scenario, all cells of the S-RAN are shared between POPs.
+
+The management architecture for GWCN is depicted in figure 4.2-2. It is compliant with 3GPP management reference model (TS 32.101 [2]).
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the management architecture for GWCN. At the top, there are two stacks of boxes labeled 'POP-NM' and 'MOD-NM'. Below these, a dashed horizontal line represents the 'Itf-N' interface. Below the interface, there are three boxes: 'POP-RAN-DM', 'MOP-SR-DM', and 'POP-RAN-DM'. The 'MOP-SR-DM' box is connected to the 'MOD-NM' and 'MOP-NM' boxes above it. Below each 'POP-RAN-DM' box is a box labeled 'POP-CORE-DM'. Below each 'POP-CORE-DM' box is a box labeled 'MSC/SGSN/HLR/MME/HSS'. Below each 'MSC/SGSN/HLR/MME/HSS' box is a box labeled 'BTS/BSC/RNC/(e)NodeB'. Below the 'MOP-SR-DM' box is a box labeled 'MOP-SC-DM'. Below the 'MOP-SC-DM' box is a box labeled 'S-CORE (MSC/SGSN/MME)'. Below the 'S-CORE (MSC/SGSN/MME)' box is a box labeled 'S-RAN (BTS/BSC/RNC/(e)NodeB)'. At the bottom, there are three labels: 'NEs owned by Participating Operator A (MCC 1, MNC 1)' under the left 'BTS/BSC/RNC/(e)NodeB', 'NEs owned by Master Operator and shared between POs' under the 'S-RAN', and 'NEs owned by Participating Operator B (MCC 1, MNC 2)' under the right 'BTS/BSC/RNC/(e)NodeB'.
+
+Management architecture for GWCN diagram showing POP-NM, MOD-NM, MOP-NM, POP-RAN-DM, MOP-SR-DM, POP-CORE-DM, MOP-SC-DM, S-CORE (MSC/SGSN/MME), MSC/SGSN/HLR/MME/HSS, and BTS/BSC/RNC/(e)NodeB connected via Itf-N interface.
+
+Figure 4.2-2: Management architecture for GWCN
+
+# 5 Business level requirements
+
+## 5.1 Requirements
+
+### 5.1.1 Requirements for the OAM&P of shared RAN
+
+**REQ-NS\_GEN-CON-1** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall support a capability allowing its authorized consumer to manage S-RAN of any of the following radio access technologies:
+
+- i/ GERAN;
+- ii/ UTRAN;
+
+iii/ E-UTRAN;
+
+iv/ NG-RAN.
+
+**REQ-NS\_GEN-CON-2** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall support a capability allowing its authorized consumer to manage S-RAN according to any of the following scenarios:
+
+i/ Multi-Operator Core Network
+
+ii/ Gateway Core Network.
+
+**REQ-NS\_GEN-CON-3** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall support a capability allowing its authorized consumer to know which POPs the shared resources belong to.
+
+**REQ-NS\_GEN-CON-4** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall support a capability allowing its authorized consumer to configure which POPs share each cell.
+
+**REQ-NS\_GEN-CON-5** Any POP shall be able to activate a signaling-based trace / MDT session on its subscribers, whether they are attached to the POP own RAN or to the S-RAN, provided:
+
+a/ this is compliant with the RAN sharing contract; and
+
+b/ user consent for participation in MDT is respected.
+
+**REQ-NS\_GEN-CON-6** The MOP shall be able, on behalf of any POP, to activate an area-based trace / MDT session, on the portion of the S-RAN that the POP shares and on the POP subscribers only, from the 3GPP management system of MOP, provided
+
+a/ only the POP related subscriber data are collected;
+
+b/ this is compliant with the RAN sharing contract; and
+
+c/ user consent for participation in MDT is respected.
+
+**REQ-NS\_GEN-CON-7** The MOP shall be able, on behalf of multiple POPs, to activate an area-based trace / MDT session, on the portion of the S-RAN that each POP shares and on each POP subscribers only, from the 3GPP management system of MOP, provided:
+
+a/ each POP has access only to its subscriber data (i.e. not to other POPs' subscriber data);
+
+b/ this is compliant with the RAN sharing contract; and
+
+c/ user consent for participation in MDT is respected.
+
+### 5.1.2 Requirements for the OA&M of shared core network elements
+
+**REQ-NS\_GEN-CON-8** In the GWCN scenario, the MOP shall be able to manage **S-CORE**.
+
+**REQ-NS\_GEN-CON-9** The MOP shall be able to know which POPs the shared core network elements belong to.
+
+**REQ-NS\_GEN-CON-10** The MOP shall be able to configure which POPs share each core network element.
+
+### 5.1.3 Requirements for the management of measurements for cross-operator accounting based on data volume and QoS
+
+**REQ-NS\_PM-CON-1** The MOP shall be able to charge the POPs for the data volume used by POP's users per selected QoS profile criteria via measurements defined for shared networks.
+
+- The QoS profile criteria may include QCI Indicator, GBR Indicator, ARP Indicator.
+- It shall be possible to differentiate between DL and UL.
+
+**REQ-NS\_PM-CON-2** The MOP shall be able to set the reliability for the selected measurements defined for cross operator accounting purpose in shared networks.
+
+**REQ-NS\_PM-CON-3** A maximum number of 200 counter instances (for measurements defined for cross operator accounting purpose in shared networks) can be recorded per granularity period.
+
+### 5.1.4 Requirements for management support for NG-RAN MOCN network sharing scenario with same Cell Identity broadcast
+
+**Req-MOCN\_SameCellId\_Cfg-CON-1** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall have the capability to configure NgC and NgU individually for each POP.
+
+**Req- MOCN\_SameCellId\_Cfg-CON-2** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall have the capability to configure PLMNId individually for each POP.
+
+**Req- MOCN\_SameCellId\_Per-CON-3** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall have the capability to collect and report some measurements (e.g. active UEs measurements, packet delay measurements) in PLMN granularity for each POP.
+
+**Req-MOCN-SameCellId-Cfg-CON-4** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall have the capability to support operator-specific configurations.
+
+**Req-MOCN-SameCellId-Cfg-CON-5** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall have the capability to support operator-specific performance measurement jobs.
+
+### 5.1.5 Requirements for management support for NG-RAN MOCN network sharing scenario with multiple Cell Identity broadcast
+
+**Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Cfg-CON-1** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall have the capability to configure NgC and NgU individually for each POP.
+
+**Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Cfg-CON-2** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall have the capability to configure PLMN-IdentityInfo (including PLMNId, NR Cell Identity, TAC) individually for each POP.
+
+**Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Perf-CON-3** The 3GPP management system shall have the capability to collect and report some measurements (e.g. active UEs measurements, packet delay measurements) in PLMN granularity for each POP.
+
+**Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Cfg-CON-4** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall have the capability to configure the common F1 interface for all POPs.
+
+**Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Cfg-CON-5** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall have the capability to configure the individual F1 interface for each POP.
+
+**Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Cfg-CON-6** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall have the capability to configure the individual NR cell relation individually for each POP.
+
+**Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Cfg-CON-7** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall have the capability to support operator-specific configurations.
+
+**Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Cfg-CON-8** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall have the capability to support operator-specific performance measurement jobs.
+
+### 5.1.6 Requirements for the OAM&P of shared NG-RAN
+
+**REQ-NS\_NG-CON-1** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall support a capability to manage both the non-shared network elements and shared network elements in a NG-RAN network at the same time.
+
+**REQ-NS\_NG-CON-2** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall support a capability to configure the NG-RAN network element to start the sharing of one currently non-shared NG-RAN network element or stop the sharing of one currently shared NG-RAN network element.
+
+**REQ-NS\_NG-CON-3** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall support a capability to configure the POP-specific attributes of the shared NG-RAN individually based on the POPs' requirements.
+
+**REQ-NS\_NG-CON-4** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall have the capability to configure the radio resources partitioning policies for the POPs based on the agreement between POPs.
+
+**Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Cfg-CON-5** The 3GPP management system of the MOP shall have the capability to configure the administrative state of the operator specific NR Cell DU.
+
+## 5.2 Actor roles
+
+For GERAN, UTRAN, and E-UTRAN:
+
+MOP-SR-DM: An entity performing an IRP Agent role in MOCN and in GWCN.
+
+MOP-SC-DM: An entity performing an IRP Agent role in GWCN.
+
+MOP-NM: An entity performing the IRP Manager role in MOCN and in GWCN.
+
+For NG-RAN:
+
+MOP-SR-DM: An entity performing the Management Service Producer role for the management of shared NG-RAN in MOCN.
+
+MOP-NM: An entity performing the Management Service Consumer role for the management of shared NG-RAN in MOCN.
+
+## 5.3 Telecommunications resources
+
+For MOCN and GWCN, the managed GERAN, UTRAN, E-UTRAN, NG-RAN network elements are viewed as relevant telecommunications resources in the present document.
+
+For GWCN, MSC, SGSN and MME are viewed as relevant telecommunications resources in the present document.
+
+## 5.4 High-level use cases
+
+### 5.4.1 Fully pooled radio resources between two POPs
+
+In this use case, cells are shared between POP A and POP B. As agreed by MOP and POPs in their RAN sharing agreement:
+
+- Radio resources of the **S-RAN** are fully pooled between POP A and POP B; UEs from POP A and POP B are served in the **S-RAN** in a first come first served mode;
+- MOP is responsible for configuring the **S-RAN** accordingly.
+
+
+
+This diagram illustrates the network architecture for fully pooled radio resources between two Packet Operator Networks (PONs), POP A and POP B. At the top, the Network Manager (NM) of POP A (MCC 1, MNC 1) and the NM of POP B (MCC 1, MNC 2) are shown. Each NM is connected to a stack of three boxes labeled 'POP-NM'. These POP-NM boxes are connected to a central stack of three boxes labeled 'MOP-NM'. A dashed horizontal line labeled 'Itf-N' separates the management plane (MOP-NM) from the data plane. Below the Itf-N line is a box labeled 'MOP-SR-DM'. This box is connected to two radio nodes, each with three cells labeled 'cell #1', 'cell #2', and 'cell #3'. The cells are represented by icons of antennas with signal waves. The text 'NEs shared between POP A and POP B' is located at the bottom, indicating that the radio resources are shared between the two operators.
+
+Diagram of fully pooled radio resources between two POPs (Figure 5.4.1-1).
+
+Figure 5.4.1-1: Fully pooled radio resources between two POPs
+
+### 5.4.2 Alarm raised on a shared cell (MOCN scenario)
+
+In this use case, an alarm is raised on cell #1 of a shared (e)NodeB. According to the RAN sharing agreement, the two POPs A and B are informed by the MOP of the occurrence of this new alarm, as well as of the alarm clearance by the MOP.
+
+
+
+This diagram shows the sequence of events for handling an alarm on a shared cell in a Multi-Operator Core Network (MOCN) scenario. The sequence is numbered 1 through 8:
+
+
+- Alarm is raised on cell #1 (shared by POP A and POP B) and sent to MOP-SR-DM.
+- Alarm is displayed on MOP-SR-DM GUI.
+- Alarm is handled by Master Operator.
+- Alarm is forwarded to MOP-NM.
+- Alarm is notified to POP A and POP B (for INFO only).
+- Alarm is cleared by MOP at DM level.
+- Alarm clearance is notified to MOP-NM.
+- Alarm clearance is notified to POP A and POP B.
+
+ The diagram uses the same network elements as Figure 5.4.1-1: NM of POP A (MCC 1, MNC 1), NM of POP B (MCC 1, MNC 2), POP-NM boxes, MOP-NM boxes, Itf-N interface, MOP-SR-DM box, and shared cells (cell #1, cell #2, cell #3) between POP A and POP B.
+
+Diagram showing the handling of an alarm raised on a shared cell (MOCN) (Figure 5.4.2-1).
+
+Figure 5.4.2-1. Handling of an alarm raised on a shared cell (MOCN)
+
+### 5.4.3 Single DM for managing S-RAN and POP own RAN
+
+In this use case, Operator A is a POP and manages its own (non-shared) NEs from its POP-RAN-DM while Operator B is both MOP and POP and manages **S-RAN** and its own (non-shared) NEs from a single DM.
+
+Operator B has several possibilities:
+
+Example #1: configure, NE per NE, which POPs share the cells that it manages; or
+
+Example #2: define two separate groups of BTSs / (e)NodeBs:
+
+- one for the **S-RAN** NEs – it shall then configure which POPs share the cells of this group of BTSs / (e)NodeBs; and
+- one for its own (non-shared) RAN NEs.
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating the Single DM for managing both S-RAN and own RAN. The diagram is split into two main sections by a vertical dashed line labeled 'Itf-N'. The left section, labeled 'Operator A manages its own NEs', shows a stack of three 'POP-NM' boxes connected to a 'POP-RAN-DM' box, which is in turn connected to a 'BTS/BSC/RNC/(e)NodeB' box. The right section, labeled 'Operator B manages the Shared RAN (Sub-network #1) and its own NEs (Sub-network #2) from the same DM', shows a stack of three 'MOP-NM' boxes and a stack of three 'POP-NM' boxes both connected to a 'Single DM' box. The 'Single DM' box is connected to two boxes: 'EM-Shared RAN' and 'EM - POP-RAN'. Below these are two boxes: 'S-RAN (BTS/BSC/RNC/(e)NodeB)' and 'Operator B only BTS/BSC/RNC/(e)NodeB'.
+
+Figure 5.4.3-1: Single DM for managing both S-RAN and own RAN
+
+### 5.4.4 Management of measurements for cross-operator accounting based on data volume and QoS
+
+The operator has made an agreement to act as a Master Operator, MOP, for another operator (Participating Operator, POP) for RAN sharing. The agreement is regulated in an SLA, which states the following: The QoS profile criteria ARP-1 – 10 and GBR-5 for QCI-4 and QCI-8 is supported. The DL QCI-4, GBR-5, and ARP-1 – 10 is charged by x Euro per Mbit, while UL QCI-4, GBR-5, and ARP-1 – 10 is charged by y Euro per Mbit. QCI-8 is charged z Euro per Mbit regardless of QoS. For cross operator accounting purpose, the network needs to provide data volume measurements with high reliability for the used QoS profile criteria to the MOP.
+
+### 5.4.5 Management support for the mixed deployment scenario of shared NG-RAN network elements and non-shared NG-RAN network elements
+
+In this use case, Operator A owns and manages a NG-RAN network. Operator A and Operator B get a NG-RAN sharing agreement that Operator A will share some of the NG-RAN network elements in its NG-RAN network with Operator B. Operator A may need to configure the NG-RAN network to start the sharing of one currently non-shared NG-RAN network element or stop the sharing of one currently shared NG-RAN network element according to the requests from Operator B in the future.
+
+### 5.4.6 Radio resources partitioning between two POPs for the shared NG-RAN
+
+In this use case, radio access network (i.e. one of multiple shared NG-RAN network elements) are shared between two POPs (POP A identified by PLMN A, POP B identified by PLMN B).
+
+As agreed by POP A and POP B in their RAN sharing agreement:
+
+- Radio resources (e.g. PRB, RRC connection, DRB) of the shared radio access network are partitioned for POP A and POP B, which means the radio resource partitioning policies (e.g. RRMPolicyRatio) of the radio access network is agreed for POP A and POP B. The detailed RRMPolicy definition for NG-RAN see the clause 4.3.36 of TS 28.541 [8]. Following is one example of RRMPolicy for corresponding POP A and POP B. In this example,
+ - POP A has 20% dedicated radio resources, 30% prioritized resources and 50% shared resources. In this case, there are 20% radio resources are dedicated for the POP A, 30% radio resources are guaranteed for POP A when it needs to use them, and 50% resources are shared with POP B.
+ - POP B has 30% prioritized resources and 20% shared resources. In this case, there are 30% radio resources are guaranteed for POP B when it needs to use them, and 20% resources are shared with POP A.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the resource partitioning for two Point of Presence (POP) entities, POP A and POP B, sharing a common radio access network. Both bars represent 100% of the available radio resources.
+
+- Structure of RRMPolicyRatio for POP A:** This bar is divided into three segments:
+ - Dedicated resources:** 20% (red segment at the bottom).
+ - Prioritized resources:** 30% (blue segment in the middle).
+ - Shared resources:** 50% (green segment at the top).
+- Structure of RRMPolicyRatio for POP B:** This bar is divided into two segments:
+ - Prioritized resources:** 30% (blue segment at the bottom).
+ - Shared resources:** 20% (green segment above the prioritized resources).
+ - The top 50% of the bar is empty, representing unused capacity or resources available to POP A when not needed by POP B.
+
+Figure 5.4.6-1: Example of structure RRMPolicy for radio access network resource partitioning for POP A and POP B. The diagram shows two vertical bars representing resource allocation. The left bar for POP A shows 100% total resources divided into Shared resources (50%, green), Prioritized resources (30%, blue), and Dedicated resources (20%, red). The right bar for POP B shows 100% total resources divided into Shared resources (20%, green) and Prioritized resources (30%, blue), with the remaining 50% being unused capacity.
+
+**Figure 5.4.6-1 Example of structure RRMPolicy for radio access network resource partitioning for POP A and POP B**
+
+Note: If the network slicing feature is supported, the RRMPolicy is defined for each RRMPolicyMemberList which contains both PLMNId and S-NSSAI. In this case, the RRMPolicy is defined in RRMPolicyMember (combination of PLMNId and S-NSSAI) granularity.
+
+MOP-NM (play the role of MnS consumer) obtains the radio resource partitioning policies the shared radio access network based on above agreement, and sends the radio resource partitioning policies to MOP-SR-DM (play the role of MnS producer) to configure the shared NG-RAN NEs. MOP-SR-DM derives the radio resource partitioning policies for corresponding cells of each shared NG-RAN NE and configures the corresponding shared NG-RAN NE with corresponding radio resource partitioning policies for corresponding cells (see RRMPolicy defined in TS 28.541[8] which is contained by RRMPolicyManagedEntity).
+
+MOP-SR-DM monitors the radio usage resources measurement (e.g. UL/DL PRB used for data traffic, RRC connections) for POP A and POP B, and send such radio usage resources measurements to MnS consumer. Based on the radio resources usage measurements and other information (e.g. service traffic requirements changes) for POP A and POP B, the radio resources partitioning policies may be updated based on the agreement between POP A and POP B. The MOP-NM requests the MOP-SR-DM to reconfigure the updated radio resources partitioning policies of the shared radio access network for corresponding POP A and POP B.
+
+# 6 Specification level requirements
+
+## 6.1 Requirements
+
+**REQ-NS\_GEN-FUN-1** The IRP Agent shall support a capability allowing the IRP Manager to configure which POPs share each cell.
+
+**REQ-NS\_GEN-FUN-2** The IRP Agent shall support a capability allowing the IRP Manager to know which POPs share each cell.
+
+**REQ-NS\_GEN-FUN-3** In GWCN, the IRP Agent shall support a capability allowing the IRP Manager to configure which POPs share each core network element.
+
+**REQ-NS\_GEN-FUN-4** In GWCN, the IRP Agent shall support a capability allowing the IRP Manager to know which POPs share each core network element.
+
+**REQ-NS\_PM-FUN-1** The IRP Agent shall have the capability to support subscription of UL and DL data volume measurements per QoS profile criteria for cross operator accounting purpose from the IRP Manager. The QoS profile criteria may include one or more of the following criteria: one QCI indicator, one GBR Indicator, one ARP Indicator, where:
+
+- a QCI Indicator identifies one specific QCI value. If the indicator is not set then all QCI values should be taken into account.
+- a GBR Indicator identifies one GBR range value defined by the management system. If the indicator is not set then all GBR ranges should be taken into account.
+- an ARP Indicator identifies one ARP priority value. If the indicator is not set then all ARP priority values should be taken into account.
+
+**REQ-NS\_PM-FUN-2** The IRP Agent shall support the IRP Manager setting the reliability for the counter instances in a measurement job. The detailed definition of reliability is vendor specific.
+
+**REQ-NS\_PM-FUN-3** The IRP Agent shall support up to a maximum number of 200 recorded counter instances per granularity period of data volume measurements for cross operator accounting purpose.
+
+**REQ-NS\_PM-FUN-4** The IRP Agent shall support the IRP Manager to access a file containing data volume measurements for cross operator accounting purposes every granularity period.
+
+## 6.2 Actor roles
+
+See clause 5.2.
+
+## 6.3 Telecommunications resources
+
+See clause 5.3.
+
+## 6.4 Use cases
+
+### 6.4.1 Management of measurements for cross-operator accounting based on data volume and QoS
+
+The network manager requests a measurement job for data volume measurements for shared network for charging purposes with high reliability, for a subset of data volume counters per shared PLMN, per UL/DL traffic direction and per QoS profile criteria. The QoS profile criteria may include one or more of the following criteria: one QCI Indicator, one GBR Indicator, one ARP Indicator, where:
+
+- a QCI Indicator identifies one specific QCI value. QCI values range from 0 to 255. If the indicator is not set then all QCI values should be taken into account.
+- a GBR Indicator identifies one GBR range value defined by the management system. GBR range values can range from 1 to N, where N is bigger than 1 (e.g. N=5). If the indicator is not set then all GBR ranges should be taken into account.
+- an ARP Indicator identifies one ARP priority value. ARP priority values range from 1 to 15. If the indicator is not set then all ARP priority values should be taken into account.
+
+An overall maximum number of 200 counter instances (measurement instances) can be recorded per granularity period.
+
+The measurement type is specified by sub-clause 4.1.9 in TS 36.314 [6].
+
+All the counters instances in the measurement job should be subject to high reliability as it is for cross operator accounting purpose. The detailed definition of reliability is vendor specific.
+
+The network provides the counters each granularity period.
+
+# --- 7 Management workflows for requirements for the management of the shared NG-RAN NE(s) in MOCN network sharing scenario
+
+## 7.1 Management of the shared NG-RAN NE(s) in MOCN network sharing scenario with the same cell Identity broadcast
+
+The NG-RAN MOCN Network Sharing with same cell identity broadcast scenario is illustrated in Figure 4.1-2 and corresponding requirements is defined in clause 5.1.4. This clause describes the workflows for the management of the shared NG-RAN NE(s) in MOCN network sharing scenario with the same cell identity broadcast.
+
+In this workflow, the radio access network (i.e. one or multiple shared NG-RAN NE(s)) is shared between two POPs (POP A identified by PLMN#1 and POP B identified by PLMN#2). Both MnS consumer and MnS producer for the management of shared NG-RAN NE(s) belong to MOP. For the **Req-MOCN\_SameCellId\_Cfg-CON-1**:
+
+MnS consumer determines the individual EP\_NgC MOI and EP\_NgU MOI (see the attributes of NgC and NgU in TS 28.541[X]) for each POP (POP A and POP B), and requests MnS producer to create and configure EP\_NgC MOI and EP\_NgU MOI for each POP.
+
+MnS producer creates and configures the EP\_NgC MOI and EP\_NgU MOI for each POP based on the requests from MnS consumer. The EP\_NgC MOI and EP\_NgU MOI are name contained by same GNBCUCPFunction MOI and GNBCUUPFunction MOI which is shared for different POPs.
+
+For the **Req-MOCN\_SameCellId\_Cfg-CON-2**:
+
+MnS consumer determines the attribute "PLMNInfoList" in NRCellIDU MOI and NRCellCU MOI (see the attribute definition in TS 28.541[X]), which includes the PLMN#1 and PLMN#2, and requests MnS producer to configure NRCellIDU MOI and NRCellCU MOI with attribute "PLMNInfoList".
+
+MnS producer configures the NG-RAN NE(s) (i.e. subtree of ManagedElement MOI) based on the requests from MnS consumer, including configuring the NRCellIDU MOI and NRCellCU MOI with attribute "PLMNInfoList" to include PLMN#1 and PLMN#2.
+
+For the **Req-MOCN\_SameCellId\_Per-CON-3**:
+
+MnS producer collects the individual measurements for POP A and POP B in PLMN granularity by utilizing PLMN granularity subcounter. For the concrete PLMN granularity measurements, see TS 28.552[9].
+
+MnS producer sends the individual measurements for POP A and POP B in PLMN granularity to MnS consumer.
+
+## 7.2 Management of the shared NG-RAN NE(s) in MOCN network sharing scenario with the multiple cell Identity broadcast
+
+The NG-RAN MOCN Network Sharing with multiple cell identity broadcast scenario is illustrated in Figure 4.1-3 and corresponding requirements is defined in clause 5.1.5. This clause describes the workflows for the management of the shared NG-RAN NE(s) in MOCN network sharing scenario with the multiple cell identity broadcast.
+
+In this workflow, the radio access network (i.e. one or multiple shared NG-RAN NE(s)) is shared between two POPs (POP A identified by PLMN#1 and POP B identified by PLMN#2). Both MnS consumer and MnS producer for the management of shared NG-RAN NE(s) belong to MOP.
+
+For the **Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Cfg-CON-1**:
+
+MnS consumer determines the individual EP\_NgC MOI and EP\_NgU MOI (see the attributes of NgC and NgU in TS 28.541[8]) for each POP (POP A and POP B), and requests MnS producer to create and configure EP\_NgC MOI and EP\_NgU MOI for each POP.
+
+MnS producer creates and configures the EP\_NgC MOI and EP\_NgU MOI for each POP based on the requests from MnS consumer. The EP\_NgC MOI and EP\_NgU MOI are name contained by corresponding POP's GNBCUCPFunction MOI and GNBCUUPFunction MOI.
+
+For the **Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Cfg-CON-2**
+
+MnS consumer determines the individual OperatorDU MOI and NROperatorCellDU MOI (see the attributes of OperatorDU and NROperatorCellDU in TS 28.541[8]) for each POP (POP A and POP B), and requests MnS producer to create and configure OperatorDU MOI and NROperatorCellDU MOI for each POP.
+
+MnS producer configures the NG-RAN NE(s) (i.e. subtree of ManagedElement) based on the requests from MnS consumer, including creates and configures OperatorDU and NROperatorCellDU MOI for each POP.
+
+MnS consumer determines the individual NRCellCU MOI (see the attributes of NRCellCU in TS 28.541[8]) for each POP (POP A and POP B), and requests MnS producer to create and configure NRCellCU MOI for each POP.
+
+MnS producer configures the NG-RAN NE(s) (i.e. subtree of ManagedElement) based on the requests from MnS consumer, including creates and configures NRCellCU MOI for each POP.
+
+For the **Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Cfg-CON-3**
+
+MnS producer collects the individual measurements for POP A and POP B in PLMN granularity by utilizing PLMN granularity subcounter or associated with OperatorDU and NROperatorCellDU. For the concrete PLMN granularity measurements, see TS 28.552[9].
+
+MnS producer sends the individual measurements for POP A and POP B in PLMN granularity to MnS consumer.
+
+For the **Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Cfg-CON-4** and **Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Cfg-CON-5**
+
+MnS consumer determines the individual EP\_F1C MOI and EP\_F1U MOI (see corresponding attributes in TS 28.541[8]) for each POP (POP A and POP B), and requests MnS producer to create and configure these MOIs for each POP. In case of common F1 interface configuration, the values of the EP\_F1C MOI and EP\_F1U MOI attributes (including localAddress and remoteAddress) contained by different POP's OperatorDU MOI of the same GNBDFUFunction MOI should be same.
+
+MnS producer creates and configures the individual EP\_F1C MOI and EP\_F1U MOI for each POP based on the requests from MnS consumer. The EP\_F1C MOI and EP\_F1U MOI are name contained by corresponding POP's OperatorDU and associated to it's own GNBCUCPFunction MOI and GNBCUUPFunction MOI.
+
+For the **Req-MOCN-MultiCellId-Cfg-CON-6**
+
+MnS consumer determines the NRCellRelation MOI(s) (see corresponding attributes in TS 28.541[8]) for each POP (POP A and POP B), and requests MnS producer to create and configure NRCellRelation MOI(s) for each POP.
+
+MnS producer configures the NG-RAN NE(s) (i.e. subtree of ManagedElement) based on the requests from MnS consumer, including creates and configures the individual NRCellRelation MOI for each POP.
+
+
+
+# --- Annex A (informative): Network sharing agreement
+
+Prior to any network sharing deployment, the MOP and the POPs have to agree on legal, financial, technical and operational aspects. Among operational aspects, the network sharing agreement captures the following (non-exhaustive list):
+
+- Organizations involved (i.e. Operators) and their roles in the network sharing deployment.
+- Exhaustive list of shared and unshared resources in the shared network.
+- Rights attached to each role (e.g. rights to configure network resources, rights to receive alarms, etc.).
+- Duties attached to each role (e.g. obligation for the MOP to provide POPs with monthly KPIs, etc.).
+- Delegations (if any) given by any organization to another organization.
+- Service Level Agreements (SLAs).
+
+# Annex B (informative): Change history
+
+| Change history | | | | | | | |
+|----------------|-------|-----------|----|-----|--------------------------------|--------|---------------|
+| Date | TSG # | TSG Doc. | CR | Rev | Subject/Comment | Old | New |
+| 2014-12 | SA#66 | SP-140795 | | | Presented for approval | 1.2.0 | 2.0.0 |
+| 2014-12 | | | | | Version after approval | 2.0.0 | 12.0.0 |
+| 2016-01 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-13 version (MCC) | 12.0.0 | 13.0.0 |
+
+| Change history | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------|---------|-----------|------|-----|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|--------|
+| Date | Meeting | TDoc | CR | Rev | Cat | Subject/Comment | New version | |
+| 2016-12 | SA#74 | SP-160856 | 0001 | 2 | B | Add use cases and requirements for Management of measurements for cross-operator accounting based on data volume and QoS | | 14.0.0 |
+| 2018-01 | SA#78 | SP-170964 | 0002 | - | F | Correcting requirements tags | | 14.1.0 |
+| 2018-06 | - | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-15 version (MCC) | | 15.0.0 |
+| 2020-07 | - | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-16 version (MCC) | | 16.0.0 |
+| 2021-03 | SA#91e | SP-210141 | 0003 | 1 | B | Update the scope and background of network sharing scenarios | | 17.0.0 |
+| 2021-03 | SA#91e | SP-210141 | 0006 | 1 | B | Update the business requirements to support NG-RAN sharing | | 17.0.0 |
+| 2021-03 | SA#91e | SP-210141 | 0009 | 1 | B | Update business requirements to applicable for SBMA | | 17.0.0 |
+| 2021-06 | SA#92e | SP-210415 | 0011 | - | B | Add requirements for management support for 5G MOCN network sharing scenario with same Cell Identity | | 17.1.0 |
+| 2021-06 | SA#92e | SP-210415 | 0012 | 1 | B | Add requirements for management support for 5G MOCN network sharing scenario with multiple Cell Identity | | 17.1.0 |
+| 2021-06 | SA#92e | SP-210415 | 0013 | 1 | B | Add mixed NG-RAN sharing use case and requirements | | 17.1.0 |
+| 2021-09 | SA#93e | SP-210877 | 0014 | 2 | B | Add NG-RAN sharing individual management use case and requirements | | 17.2.0 |
+| 2021-12 | SA#94e | SP-211471 | 0015 | - | B | Update RAN sharing scenarios to cover 5G RAN sharing | | 17.3.0 |
+| 2021-12 | SA#94e | SP-211471 | 0016 | - | B | Update RAN sharing scenarios to cover 5G RAN sharing | | 17.3.0 |
+| 2022-03 | SA#95e | SP-220184 | 0017 | - | F | Clean up on concept and business level requirements | | 17.4.0 |
+| 2022-03 | SA#95e | SP-220184 | 0018 | - | B | Add missing use case and requirements for radio resources partitioning between POPs | | 17.4.0 |
+| 2022-03 | SA#95e | SP-220184 | 0019 | 1 | B | Solution description for the requirements for the management of the shared NG-RAN NE(s) in MOCN network sharing scenario | | 17.4.0 |
+| 2022-03 | SA#95e | SP-220184 | 0020 | - | B | Add requirement about administrative management capability for operator specific cell | | 17.4.0 |
+| 2022-12 | SA#98e | SP-221168 | 0022 | - | F | delete redundant figure | | 17.5.0 |
+| 2023-03 | SA#99 | SP-230196 | 0023 | - | F | correct the wrong figure number | | 17.6.0 |
+| 2023-09 | SA#101 | SP-230966 | 0024 | 1 | B | Add new requirements for management support for NG-RAN MOCN network sharing scenario | | 18.0.0 |
+| 2023-12 | SA#102 | SP-231494 | 0026 | - | B | Rel-18 CR TS 32.130 Add requirements for NG-RAN MOCN network sharing scenario with multiple Cell Identity broadcast | | 18.1.0 |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32153/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32153/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b5eef52bd5febdd311709f2f538ca9c6cea1c447
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32153/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:446754ca0bb17b4a2a0587f9d84b96c00ae0c9961ee7235e36de0e0226045679
+size 9370
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32153/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32153/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..24b4e0f6153bcb31e5768d4c6eba8e831e25cc33
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32153/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:84b1e2e243992fc5e075ea2fbbd2aa1db95c73b5c0e03fb33b66cbcd826b776d
+size 6144
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32153/raw.md b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32153/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eb20366df8219f3568d4fab7705cc08c5d755afa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32153/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,1284 @@
+
+
+# 3GPP TS 32.153 V18.0.0 (2024-04) ---
+
+*Technical Specification*
+
+## **3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Integration Reference Point (IRP) technology specific templates, rules and guidelines (Release 18)** ---
+
+
+
+The logo for 5G Advanced, featuring a stylized '5G' with a green signal wave icon above the 'G', and the word 'ADVANCED' in smaller letters to the right.
+
+5G Advanced logo
+
+
+
+The 3GPP logo, consisting of the letters '3GPP' in a stylized font with a red signal wave icon below the 'P', and the text 'A GLOBAL INITIATIVE' underneath.
+
+3GPP logo
+
+## --- **Keywords**
+
+UMTS, management
+
+## **3GPP**
+
+## --- **Postal address**
+
+## --- **3GPP support office address**
+
+650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis
+Valbonne - FRANCE
+Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16
+
+## --- **Internet**
+
+
+
+## --- **Copyright Notification**
+
+No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.
+The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
+
+© 2024, 3GPP Organizational Partners (ARIB, ATIS, CCSA, ETSI, TSDSI, TTA, TTC).
+All rights reserved.
+
+UMTS™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its members
+3GPP™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
+LTE™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
+GSM® and the GSM logo are registered and owned by the GSM Association
+
+# Contents
+
+| | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|
+| Foreword ..... | 5 |
+| Introduction ..... | 5 |
+| 1 Scope..... | 6 |
+| 2 References..... | 6 |
+| 3 Definitions and abbreviations ..... | 7 |
+| 3.1 Definitions..... | 7 |
+| 3.2 Abbreviations ..... | 7 |
+| 4 Interface IRP SS template..... | 8 |
+| 5 NRM IRP SS template ..... | 14 |
+| Annex A (normative): General rules for Solution Sets (SS) ..... | 16 |
+| A.1 Introduction..... | 16 |
+| A.2 Solution Set (SS) versioning..... | 16 |
+| A.3 Referenced Information Service (IS) specification..... | 16 |
+| Annex B (normative): Technology specific rules & guidelines for CORBA Solution Sets..... | 17 |
+| B.1 Rules..... | 17 |
+| B.1.1 Introduction ..... | 17 |
+| B.1.2 Rules for specification of CORBA Solution Sets ..... | 17 |
+| B.1.2.1 Introduction ..... | 17 |
+| B.1.2.2 Pragma prefix ..... | 17 |
+| B.1.3 Implementation aspects of Interface IRP CORBA Solution Sets ..... | 17 |
+| B.1.3.1 Introduction ..... | 17 |
+| B.1.3.2 IRP Agent behaviour on incoming optional method ..... | 18 |
+| B.1.3.3 IRP Agent behaviour on incoming optional parameter of operation ..... | 18 |
+| B.1.3.4 IRP Agent behaviour on outgoing attributes of notification ..... | 18 |
+| B.1.3.5 Encoding rule of absence semantics..... | 18 |
+| B.1.4 Rules for NRM IRP CORBA SS extensions..... | 19 |
+| B.1.4.1 Allowed extensions..... | 19 |
+| B.1.4.2 Extensions not allowed..... | 19 |
+| B.2 Guidelines (Style Guide for CORBA SS IDL) ..... | 20 |
+| B.2.1 Modules and File..... | 20 |
+| B.2.1.1 Use of Modules..... | 20 |
+| B.2.1.2 File Names ..... | 20 |
+| B.2.1.3 Include Conventions ..... | 20 |
+| B.2.1.4 File Structure ..... | 21 |
+| B.2.1.4.1 File Internal Identification ..... | 21 |
+| B.2.1.4.2 File Guard ..... | 21 |
+| B.2.1.4.3 Required Contents..... | 21 |
+| B.2.1.4.4 Example illustrating a File Structure ..... | 21 |
+| B.2.2 Identifiers ..... | 22 |
+| B.2.2.1 Mixed Case, Beginning Upper, No Underscores ..... | 22 |
+| B.2.2.2 Lower Case with Underscores..... | 22 |
+| B.2.2.3 Upper Case with Underscores ..... | 23 |
+| B.2.2.4 Naming IDL Sequence Types ..... | 23 |
+| B.2.3 Interface IRP ..... | 24 |
+| B.2.3.1 Constant String and Type Definitions ..... | 24 |
+| B.2.3.2 Operations..... | 25 |
+| B.2.3.3 Notifications ..... | 25 |
+| B.2.4 NRM IRP..... | 27 |
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|
+| Annex C (normative): | Technology specific rules & guidelines for SOAP SSs..... | 28 |
+| C.1 | Rules..... | 28 |
+| C.1.1 | Introduction ..... | 28 |
+| C.1.2 | Rules for specification of SOAP Solution Sets ..... | 28 |
+| C.1.2.1 | Introduction ..... | 28 |
+| C.1.2.2 | File names..... | 28 |
+| C.1.2.3 | Void ..... | 28 |
+| C.1.2.4 | XML version encoding..... | 28 |
+| C.1.2.5 | Namespaces ..... | 29 |
+| C.1.3 | Implementation aspects of Interface IRP SOAP Solution Sets ..... | 29 |
+| C.1.3.1 | Introduction ..... | 29 |
+| C.1.3.n | XXXX rule ..... | 29 |
+| C.2 | Guidelines (Style Guide for SOAP SS WSDL) ..... | 29 |
+| C.2.1 | File structure..... | 29 |
+| C.2.1.1 | Definitions ..... | 29 |
+| C.2.1.2 | Namespaces ..... | 30 |
+| C.2.1.3 | Documentation ..... | 30 |
+| C.2.1.4 | Types ..... | 30 |
+| C.2.1.5 | Message ..... | 30 |
+| C.2.1.6 | Port type..... | 30 |
+| C.2.1.7 | Binding ..... | 30 |
+| C.2.1.8 | Port ..... | 30 |
+| C.2.1.9 | Service ..... | 30 |
+| C.2.2 | Identifiers ..... | 30 |
+| C.2.2.n | Rule n ..... | 30 |
+| C.3 | XML Schema Guidelines..... | 30 |
+| C.3.1 | XSD guidelines for messages definition ..... | 30 |
+| C.3.1.1 | Request message..... | 30 |
+| C.3.1.2 | Response messages..... | 30 |
+| C.3.1.3 | Fault messages..... | 31 |
+| C.3.2 | XSD guidelines for parameters definition..... | 31 |
+| C.3.1.1 | General guidelines ..... | 31 |
+| C.3.1.1 | Simple type definitions ..... | 31 |
+| C.3.1.2 | Complex type definition ..... | 31 |
+| C.3.3 | Identifiers ..... | 31 |
+| Annex D (normative): | Technology specific rules & guidelines for XML specifications ..... | 32 |
+| D.1 | Rules..... | 32 |
+| D.1.1 | XSD Use Cases ..... | 32 |
+| D.1.1.1 | Background..... | 32 |
+| D.1.1.2 | Use Cases Set 1 ..... | 32 |
+| D.1.1.3 | Use Cases Set 2 ..... | 33 |
+| D.1.2 | Rules for NRM IRP XML specification extensions..... | 33 |
+| D.1.3 | XML version encoding..... | 33 |
+| D.2 | Guidelines ..... | 34 |
+| Annex E (informative): | Change history..... | 35 |
+
+# --- Foreword
+
+This Technical Specification has been produced by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).
+
+The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within the TSG and may change following formal TSG approval. Should the TSG modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by the TSG with an identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows:
+
+Version x.y.z
+
+where:
+
+- x the first digit:
+ - 1 presented to TSG for information;
+ - 2 presented to TSG for approval;
+ - 3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control.
+- y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections, updates, etc.
+- z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document.
+
+# --- Introduction
+
+The present document is part of a TS-family covering the 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; as identified below:
+
+- TS 32.150: "Integration Reference Point (IRP) Concept and definitions".
+- TS 32.153: "Integration Reference Point (IRP) technology specific templates, rules and guidelines"**
+- TS 32.154: "Backward and Forward Compatibility (BFC); Concept and definitions".
+- TS 32.155: "Requirements template".
+- TS 32.156: "Telecommunication management; Fixed Mobile Convergence (FMC) Model Repertoire";
+- TS 32.157: "Telecommunication management; Integration Reference Point (IRP) Information Service (IS) template".
+
+## --- 1 Scope
+
+The present document contains the templates to be used for the production of Integration Reference Point (IRP) technology-specific specifications.
+
+## --- 2 References
+
+The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present document.
+
+- References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or non-specific.
+ - For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.
+ - For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document *in the same Release as the present document*.
+- [1] 3GPP TS 32.101: "Telecommunication management; Principles and high level requirements".
+- [2] 3GPP TS 32.102: "Telecommunication management; Architecture".
+- [3] 3GPP TS 32.150: "Telecommunication management; Integration Reference Point (IRP) Concept and definitions".
+- [4] Void
+- [5] Void
+- [6] 3GPP TS 32.111-2: "Telecommunication management; Fault Management; Part 2: Alarm Integration Reference Point (IRP): Information Service (IS)".
+- [7] Void
+- [8] W3C SOAP 1.2 specification ().
+- [9] OMG IDL Style Guide, ab/98-06-03, June 17, 1998.
+- [10] W3C WSDL 1.1 specification ()
+- [11] Void.
+- [12] Void.
+- [13] Void.
+- [14] Void.
+- [15] Void.
+- [16] IETF RFC 3629 ().
+- [17] 3GPP TS 28.652: "Telecommunication management; Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (UTRAN) Network Resource Model (NRM) Integration Reference Point (IRP); Information Service (IS)".
+
+## 3 Definitions and abbreviations
+
+### 3.1 Definitions
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the terms and definitions given in 3GPP TS 32.101 [1], 3GPP TS 32.102 [2], 3GPP TS 32.150 [3] and the following apply:
+
+**IRP Agent:** See 3GPP TS 32.150 [3].
+
+**IRP Manager:** See 3GPP TS 32.150 [3].
+
+**SOAP:** See [8].
+
+### 3.2 Abbreviations
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the abbreviations given in 3GPP TS 32.101 [1], 3GPP TS 32.102 [2], 3GPP TS 32.150 [3] and the following apply:
+
+| | |
+|-------|-------------------------------------------------|
+| CM | Conditional Mandatory |
+| CM | Configuration Management |
+| CO | Conditional Optional |
+| CORBA | Common Object Request Broker Architecture (OMG) |
+| FF | File Format |
+| IDL | Interface Definition Language |
+| IOC | Information Object Class |
+| IOC | Information Object Class |
+| IRP | Integration Reference Point |
+| IS | Information Service |
+| M | Mandatory |
+| MO | Managed Object |
+| MOC | Managed Object Class |
+| NRM | Network Resource Model |
+| O | Optional |
+| OMG | Object Management Group |
+| TS | Technical Specification |
+| SOAP | W3C acronym |
+| SS | Solution Set |
+| SuM | Subscription Management |
+| UML | Unified Modelling Language (OMG) |
+| URI | Uniform Resource Identifier |
+| WSDL | Web Service Description Language |
+| XML | eXtensible Markup Language |
+| XSD | XML Schema Definition |
+
+# 4 Interface IRP SS template
+
+This clause contains the Interface IRP SS template.
+
+The clauses in this template (that shall be used in the SS specifications) are numbered starting with "X", which in general should correspond to clause 4 that is the beginning of the normative part of a TS. However, if there is a need in a specific SS to introduce additional clauses in the TS body, X may correspond to a number higher than 4.
+
+The SS templates use qualifiers M, O, CM and CO. The semantics of these qualifiers are defined in TS 32.150 [3].
+
+The introductory clauses (from clause 1 to clause 3) for the SS should be modelled similarly to that of clause 1 to 3 of this specification.
+
+Instructions are written in *italics*.
+
+Usage of fonts shall be according to the following table.
+
+**Table: Usage of fonts**
+
+| Item | Font |
+|--------------------|-------------|
+| Class names | Courier New |
+| Attribute names | Courier New |
+| Operation names | Courier New |
+| Parameter names | Courier New |
+| Assertion names | Courier New |
+| Notification names | Courier New |
+| Exception names | Courier New |
+| State names | Arial |
+| Enumerated values | Arial |
+
+## X Architectural Features
+
+"X" represents a clause number in the actual SS. It contains at least the following this subclause:
+
+### X.1 General
+
+This subclause contains the following paragraph:
+
+"The overall architectural feature of is specified in 3GPP TS []. This clause specifies features that are specific to the SS."
+
+Example:
+
+"The overall architectural feature of Alarm IRP is specified in 3GPP TS 32.111-2 [6]. This clause specifies features that are specific to the CORBA SS."
+
+*Specific for SOAP SS: the supported XSD, WSDL and SOAP versions shall be indicated together with the style and encoding style, and the namespaces with corresponding prefixes used in the WSDL specifications. Therefore the SOAP SS also contains the information quoted below:*
+
+"The SOAP specification [relevant reference], XSD specification [relevant reference] and WSDL specification [relevant reference] are supported.
+
+This specification uses "" style in WSDL file.
+
+This specification uses "" encoding style in WSDL file.
+
+This specification uses a number of namespace prefixes which are listed in Table X.1.
+
+| Prefix | Namespace |
+|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| http | http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/ |
+| soap | http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/ |
+| xs or xsd | http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema |
+| xsi | http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance |
+| | |
+
+**Table X.1: Prefixes and Namespaces used in this specification**
+
+#### »X.a
+
+
+
+"a" represents a number, starting at 2 and increasing by 1 with each new feature.
+
+*NOTE: This subclause is optional.*
+
+## Y Mapping
+
+"Y" represents a clause number, immediately following "X".
+
+### Y.1 Operation and Notification mapping
+
+*It contains this leading paragraph:*
+
+"The : IS (see 3GPP TS []) defines semantics of operation and notification visible across the Itf-N. Table Y.1.1 indicates mapping of these operations and notifications to their equivalents defined in this SS."
+
+*Example:*
+
+"Alarm IRP: IS 3GPP TS 32.111-2 [6] defines semantics of operation and notification visible across the Itf-N. Table Y.1.1 indicates mapping of these operations and notifications to their equivalents defined in this SS."
+
+*The table includes all operations and notifications, including those inherited. The table lists the operations first and then the notifications. The list order is the same as the one used in the IS. Semantics for the Qualifier is defined in Ref [x].*
+
+**Table Y.1.1: Mapping from IS Operation/Notification to SS equivalents**
+
+| IS Operation/Notification
in 3GPP TS [] | SS Method | Qualifier |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|----------------|
+| | | M, O, CM or CO |
+| | | M, O, CM or CO |
+| ... | | |
+| .. | | |
+| notify | | M, O, CM or CO |
+| ... | ... | |
+
+### Y.2 Operation parameter mapping
+
+*It contains this leading paragraph:*
+
+"Reference 3GPP TS [] defines semantics of parameters carried in operations across the Itf-N. The following set of tables indicate the mapping of these parameters, as per operation, to their equivalents defined in this SS."
+
+*Example:*
+
+"Reference 3GPP TS 32.111-2 [6] defines semantics of parameters carried in operations across the Itf-N. The following set of tables indicate the mapping of these parameters, as per operation, to their equivalents defined in this SS."
+
+**Table Y.2.1: Mapping from IS parameters to SS equivalents**
+
+| IS Operation parameter | SS Method parameter | Qualifier |
+|------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------|
+| | | M, O, CM or CO |
+| | | M, O, CM or CO |
+| ... | ... | ... |
+| ... | ... | ... |
+| status | ... | M |
+
+**Table Y.2.2: Mapping from IS parameters to SS equivalents**
+
+| IS Operation parameter | SS Method parameter | Qualifier |
+|------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------|
+| | | M, O, CM or CO |
+| ... | ... | ... |
+| status | ... | M |
+
+**Table Y.2.x:**
+
+| IS Operation parameter | SS Method parameter | Qualifier |
+|------------------------|---------------------|-----------|
+| ... | ... | ... |
+| ... | ... | ... |
+| status | ... | M |
+
+### Y.3 Notification parameter mapping
+
+*It contains this leading paragraph:*
+
+"Reference 3GPP TS [] defines semantics of parameters carried in notifications. The following tables indicate the mapping of these parameters to their SS equivalents."
+
+*Specific for CORBA SS: CORBA SS uses OMG CORBA Structured Event to carry IS-defined notification parameters. The Structured Event has the OMG defined parameters. These parameters will be related to the SS equivalents. So, the SS contains this paragraph.*
+
+"
+
+The following tables indicate the mapping of these parameters to their OMG CORBA Structured Event (defined in OMG Notification Service []) equivalents. The composition of OMG Structured Event, as defined in the OMG Notification Service [], is:
+
+#### Header
+
+- Fixed Header
+ - domain\_name
+ - type\_name
+ - event\_name
+- Variable Header
+
+#### Body
+
+- filterable\_body\_fields
+- remaining\_body
+
+The following tables list all OMG Structured Event attributes in the second column. The first column identifies the IRP: IS [] defined notification parameters.
+
+"
+
+**Table Y.3.1: Mapping for notifyKkk**
+
+| IS Parameters | Parameters | Qualifier | Comment |
+|---------------|-----------------|-----------|---------|
+| | | M or O | ... |
+| | | M or O | ... |
+| ... | ... | M or O | ... |
+
+## Z Notification Interface
+
+"Z" represents a number, immediately following "Y".
+
+This sub-clause captures SS technology specific details required to realize the IS-defined for notifications.
+
+Specific for CORBA SS:
+
+The SS contains this:
+
+"
+
+OMG CORBA Notification push operation is used to realise the notification of AlarmIRPNotifications. All the notifications in this interface are implemented using this `push_structured_event` method.
+
+### Z.1 Method push (M)
+
+```
+module CosNotifyComm {
+...
+Interface SequencePushConsumer : NotifyPublish {
+ void push_structured_events(
+ in CosNotification::EventBatch notifications)
+ raises( CosEventComm::Disconnected );
+ ...
+}; // SequencePushConsumer
+...
+}; // CosNotifyComm
+```
+
+NOTE 1: The `push_structured_events` method takes an input parameter of type `EventBatch` as defined in the OMG `CosNotification` module (OMG Notification Service [1]). This data type is the same as a sequence of Structured Events. Upon invocation, this parameter will contain a sequence of Structured Events being delivered to IRPManager by IRPAgent to which it is connected.
+
+NOTE 2: The maximum number of events that will be transmitted within a single invocation of this operation is controlled by IRPAgent wide configuration parameter.
+
+NOTE 3: The amount of time the supplier (IRPAgent) of a sequence of Structured Events will accumulate individual events into the sequence before invoking this operation is controlled by IRPAgent wide configuration parameter as well.
+
+NOTE 4: IRPAgent may push `EventBatch` with only one Structured Event.
+
+"
+
+# --- 5 NRM IRP SS template
+
+This clause contains the NRM IRP SS template.
+
+The clauses in this template (that shall be used in the SS specifications) are numbered starting with "X", which in general should correspond to clause 4 that is the beginning of the normative part of a TS. However, if there is a need in a specific SS to introduce additional clauses in the TS body, X may correspond to a number higher than 4.
+
+The introductory clauses (from clause 1 to clause 3) for the SS should be modelled similarly to that of this specification.
+
+Usage of fonts shall be according to the following table.
+
+**Table: Usage of fonts**
+
+| Item | Font |
+|--------------------|-------------|
+| Class names | Courier New |
+| Attribute names | Courier New |
+| Assertion names | Courier New |
+| Notification names | Courier New |
+| State names | Arial |
+| Enumerated values | Arial |
+
+---
+
+## X Architectural Features
+
+*"X" represents a clause number in the actual SS. It contains at least the following subclause:*
+
+### X.1 General
+
+*This subclause contains the following paragraph:*
+
+"The overall architectural feature of is specified in 3GPP TS []. This clause specifies features that are specific to the SS."
+
+*Example:*
+
+"The overall architectural feature of UTRAN Network Resources IRP is specified in 3GPP TS 28.652 [17]. This clause specifies features that are specific to the CORBA SS."
+
+### X.a
+
+**
+
+*"a" represents a number, starting at 2 and increasing by 1 with each new feature.*
+
+*NOTE: This subclause is optional.*
+
+## Y Mapping
+
+"Y" represents a number, immediately following "X".
+
+### Y.1 General
+
+*This subclause contains a general introduction to the mapping.*
+
+*For CORBA SSs, it contains the following paragraph:*
+
+"Attributes modelling associations as defined in the NRM (here also called "reference attributes") are in this SS mapped to attributes. The names of the reference attributes in the NRM are mapped to the corresponding attribute names in the MOC. When the cardinality for an association is 0..1 or 1..1 the datatype for the reference attribute is defined as an MOReference. The value of an MO reference contains the distinguished name of the associated MO. When the cardinality for an association allows more than one referred MO, the reference attribute will be of type MOReferenceSet, which contains a sequence of MO references."
+
+*For XML FF specifications, it contains the following paragraph:*
+
+"An IOC maps to an XML element of the same name as the IOC's name in the IS. An IOC attribute maps to a sub-element of the corresponding IOC's XML element, and the name of this sub-element is the same as the attribute's name in the IS."
+
+### Y.2 Information Object Class (IOC) mapping
+
+*This subclause is only applicable to NRM IRP CORBA Solution Sets. This clause contains the mapping tables of all iS-defined IOCs to corresponding SS-level MOCs, excluding those inherited.*
+
+#### Y.2.a IOC
+
+*It contains one table with Mapping from NRM IS IOC attribute name to the SS equivalent MOC attribute name and attribute types.*
+
+*"a" in the subclause heading represents a number, starting at 1 and increasing by 1 for each IOC.*
+
+| Attribute of IOC in
3GPP TS [reference number>] | SS
Attribute | SS
Type | Support
Qualifier | Read
Qualifier | Write
Qualifier |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|----------------------|-------------------|--------------------|
+| attribute-a | attribute-1 | | ... | ... | ... |
+| attribute-b | attribute-2 | | ... | ... | ... |
+| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
+
+### Y.2 Information Object Class (IOC) mapping
+
+*This subclause is only applicable to NRM IRP XML FF specifications. This subclause describes the mapping of all IS-defined IOCs to corresponding XML definitions, excluding the inherited IOCs.*
+
+*Note: This subclause is also numbered Y.2, directly following Y.1, since every NRM SS-level TS is made for only one SS technology.*
+
+# --- Annex A (normative): General rules for Solution Sets (SS)
+
+## A.1 Introduction
+
+The intent of this annex is twofold.
+
+The first intent is for 3GPP-internal use to document how a 3GPP Solution Set is (SS) produced and what it shall contain.
+
+The second intent is to give the reader of an Information Service (IS) or a Solution Set (SS) a better understanding on how to interpret the IS or SS specifications.
+
+## --- A.2 Solution Set (SS) versioning
+
+*Editor's note: For Further Study.*
+
+## --- A.3 Referenced Information Service (IS) specification
+
+A sentence shall be included in the clause "Scope" of all SS specifications. The sentence shall read as follows:
+
+"This Solution Set specification is related to Z".
+
+where Z is the 3GPP Information Service (IS) specification number including the version, such as "TS 32.111-2 V4.1.X" for the case of Alarm Integration Reference Point (IRP): Information Service (IS).
+
+NOTE: that "X", rather than the actual digit, is actually used in the sentence. This is because the value of X is not relevant for the reference purpose since different values of X identify different 3GPP published specifications that reflect only editorial changes.
+
+# --- Annex B (normative): Technology specific rules & guidelines for CORBA Solution Sets
+
+## B.1 Rules
+
+### B.1.1 Introduction
+
+The intent of this annex is threefold.
+
+- 1) The first intent is for 3GPP internal use to document how a 3GPP CORBA SS is produced and how it is structured.
+- 2) The second intent with the annex is to give the reader or implementer of a CORBA SS a better understanding on how to interpret the CORBA SS specification.
+- 3) The third and maybe most important intent is to put requirement on an implementer of a CORBA SS.
+
+It is expected that this annex is to be extended in later versions of the present document.
+
+### B.1.2 Rules for specification of CORBA Solution Sets
+
+#### B.1.2.1 Introduction
+
+This subclause identifies rules for specification of CORBA SSs. This subclause is mainly for 3GPP-internal use. It is only for information for the implementer of a CORBA SS.
+
+#### B.1.2.2 Pragma prefix
+
+All IDL-code shall define the pragma prefix using the following statement:
+
+```
+#pragma prefix "3gppsa5.org"
+```
+
+See clause B.2.1.4.3 for information of this `#pragma` statement in relation to other IDL statements.
+
+### B.1.3 Implementation aspects of Interface IRP CORBA Solution Sets
+
+#### B.1.3.1 Introduction
+
+This subclause identifies rules for the implementation of CORBA SSs. This subclause is normative for the implementer of a CORBA SS.
+
+#### B.1.3.2 IRP Agent behaviour on incoming optional method
+
+The IRP Agent, claiming compliance to a particular SS version of a particular IRP such as the Alarm IRP, shall implement all Mandatory and all Optional methods. Each method implementation shall have a signature specifying all Mandatory and all Optional parameters.
+
+- If the IRP Agent does not support a particular optional method, it shall throw the `OperationNotSupportedException` when the IRP Manager invokes that method.
+- If the IRP Agent have not implemented a particular method (because it is compiled with an IDL version that does not define the method), the CORBA ORB of the IRP Agent shall throw a system exception if the IRP Manager invokes that method.
+
+In all the above cases when an exception is thrown, the IRP Agent shall restore its state before the method invocation.
+
+#### B.1.3.3 IRP Agent behaviour on incoming optional parameter of operation
+
+An IRP Agent must implement all optional parameters, as well as mandatory parameters, in all methods.
+
+If the IRP Agent supports the implemented method but does not support its (one or more) optional input parameters, upon method invocation, the IRP Agent shall check if those parameters carry "no information" or absence semantics (defined later in subclause B.1.3.5). If the check is negative, the IRP Agent shall throw the `ParameterNotSupportedException` exception with a string carrying the name of the unsupported optional parameter.
+
+#### B.1.3.4 IRP Agent behaviour on outgoing attributes of notification
+
+CORBA SS uses OMG defined structured event to carry notification. The structured event is partitioned into header and body.
+
+The absence semantics of attribute in the header is realized by a string of zero length.
+
+The body consists of one or more name-value pair attributes. The absence semantics of these attributes is realized by their absence.
+
+For optional sub-attributes of an attribute carried by the name-value pair, their absence semantics is realized by the encoding rule of "absence semantics". See subclause B.1.3.5.
+
+#### B.1.3.5 Encoding rule of absence semantics
+
+The operation parameters are mapped to method parameters of CORBA SS. The absence semantics for an operation (input and output) parameter is method parameter type dependent.
+
+- For a string type, if the parameter is specified as a string type, the absence semantics is a string of zero length. If the parameter is specified as a union structure (preferred), the absence semantics is conveyed via a `FALSE` Boolean value switch.
+- For an integer type, if the parameter is specified as a signed, unsigned, long, etc type, the absence semantics is the highest possible positive number. If the parameter is specified as a union structure (preferred), the absence semantics is conveyed via a `FALSE` Boolean value switch.
+- For a boxed `valueType` (supported by CORBA 2.3), it is the null value.
+
+The notification parameters are mapped to attributes of the CORBA Structured Events. The absence semantics for a notification parameter is attribute position (within the Structured Event) dependent.
+
+- For the fixed header of the Structured Event header, the absence semantics is realized by a string of zero length.
+- For the filterable body fields of the Structured Event body, the absence semantics is realized by the absence of the corresponding attribute.
+
+### B.1.4 Rules for NRM IRP CORBA SS extensions
+
+This clause discusses how the models and IDL definitions provided in a particular NRM IRP CORBA SS can be extended for a particular implementation and still remain compliant with IRP specifications.
+
+Note: Protocol-neutral rules for NRM IRP IS-level extensions are defined in TS 32.150 [3] Annex G.
+
+#### B.1.4.1 Allowed extensions
+
+Vendor-specific MOCs may be supported. The vendor-specific MOCs may support new types of attributes. The standardised notifications may be issued referring to the vendor-specific MOCs and vendor-specific attributes. New MOCs shall be distinguishable from standardised MOCs by name. Standardised and vendor-specific attributes may be used in vendor-specific MOCs. Vendor-specific attribute names shall be distinguishable from existing attribute names.
+
+MOCs may be subclassed. Subclassed MOCs shall maintain the specified behaviour of the superior classes. They may add vendor-specific behaviour with vendor-specific attributes. When subclassing, naming attributes cannot be changed. The subclassed MOC shall support all attributes of its superior class. Vendor-specific attributes cannot be added to MOCs without subclassing.
+
+When subclassing, the standardised containment rules and their specified cardinality shall still be followed. As an example, ManagementNode (or its subclasses) shall be contained under SubNetwork (or its subclasses).
+
+Managed Object Instances may be instantiated as CORBA objects. This requires that the MOCs be represented in IDL. MOCs are not currently specified in IDL, but may be specified in IDL for instantiation or subclassing purposes. However, management information models should not require that IRPManagers access the instantiated managed objects other than through supported methods in the present document.
+
+Extension rules related to notifications (Notification categories, Event Types, Extended Event Types etc.) are for further study.
+
+#### B.1.4.2 Extensions not allowed
+
+The IDL specifications in the present document cannot be edited or altered. Any additional IDL specifications shall be specified in separate IDL files.
+
+IDL interfaces (note: not MOCs) specified in the present document may not be subclassed or extended. New interfaces may be defined with vendor-specific methods.
+
+## B.2 Guidelines (Style Guide for CORBA SS IDL)
+
+This subclause describes the style guide for writing IDL statements for Interface IRP and NRM IRP. The guidelines are largely based on the OMG IDL Style Guide (OMG document: ab/98-06-03) [9] with extensions for IRP use.
+
+The guide sets out consistent naming, structural conventions and usage of SS interface for the IDL in IRP CORBA SS specifications.
+
+### B.2.1 Modules and File
+
+#### B.2.1.1 Use of Modules
+
+All declarations of IDL shall be contained in modules. No declarations of interfaces and definitions shall appear in the global scope.
+
+Nesting modules is a useful technique when dealing with large namespaces to avoid name clashes and clarify relationships. A module nested within another module shall not have the same name as a top-level module in any other IRP CORBA SS specification.
+
+#### B.2.1.2 File Names
+
+CORBA SS specifications contain IDL statements.
+
+The rule defined below specifies:
+
+- a) How to partition/extract these IDL statements to be placed in a file; and
+- b) How to name the file.
+
+Note that IDL uses "#include "X"" statement where X is a name of a file containing IDL statements.
+
+##### Rule:
+
+In the annex where IDL statements are defined, use a special marker to indicate that a set of IDL statements shall be contained in one file. The name of the file shall be the name of the first IDL module, concatenated with four characters ".idl". Within a CORBA SS, multiple markers (implying multiple files), can be used.
+
+It is not allowed to have an IDL module split into multiple files.
+
+#### B.2.1.3 Include Conventions
+
+All included IDL files shall be specified using the <...> form of #include. For example:
+
+```
+#include
+```
+
+#### B.2.1.4 File Structure
+
+##### B.2.1.4.1 File Internal Identification
+
+The first line of the IDL file shall contain "//File:" followed by a single space followed by the name of the file. For example,
+
+```
+//File: ExampleIRPConstDefs.idl
+```
+
+##### B.2.1.4.2 File Guard
+
+An IDL file shall use a *guard* (consisting of three pre-processor lines) to avoid multiple definition errors. An example of a guard for the file called TestManagementIRPConstDefs.idl is:
+
+```
+#ifndef _TestManagementIRPConstDefs_idl_
+#define _TestManagementIRPConstDefs_idl_
+
+...remainder of the IDL
+
+#endif // _TestManagementIRPConstDefs_idl_
+```
+
+##### B.2.1.4.3 Required Contents
+
+If any other files are to be included, the #include statements come after the guard.
+
+After #include lines, if any, and immediately before the module statement, the following line shall appear:
+
+```
+#pragma prefix "3gppsa5.org"
+```
+
+##### B.2.1.4.4 Example illustrating a File Structure
+
+```
+//File: ExampleIRPConstDefs.idl
+#ifndef _EXAMPLE_IRP_CONST_DEFS_IDL_
+#define _EXAMPLE_IRP_CONST_DEFS_IDL_
+
+// This module describes/is part of...
+#include "ExampleIncludeOne.idl"
+#include "ExampleIncludeTwo.idl"
+
+#pragma prefix "3gppsa5.org"
+module ExampleIRPConstDefs {
+
+ // IDL Definitions here
+
+};
+#endif // _EXAMPLE_IRP_CONST_DEFS_IDL_
+```
+
+### B.2.2 Identifiers
+
+#### B.2.2.1 Mixed Case, Beginning Upper, No Underscores
+
+The following categories of identifiers follow the *Mixed Case, Beginning Upper, No Underscores* rules:
+
+- module
+- interface
+- typedef
+- Constructed types (struct, union, enum)
+- exception
+
+The "No underscores" rule is also applicable to all words that begin with an upper case letter with the remaining letters being lower case.
+
+As a further note on naming, it is not necessary to append the value "*Type*" to an identifier. The fact that it is a type is obvious from the consistent application of this naming convention.
+
+Examples:
+
+```
+module PMIRPConstDefs(...);
+interface AttributeNameValue(...);
+```
+
+#### B.2.2.2 Lower Case with Underscores
+
+The following categories of identifiers follow the *Lower Case with Underscores* rules. All letters are lower case and words (if more than one) are separated with underscores.
+
+- Operation name and notification name
+- Attribute name
+- Parameter name
+- Structure member name
+
+Examples:
+
+```
+get_notification_categories(...);
+string comment_text;
+void get_alarm_count (... , out unsigned long critical_count, ..);
+struct Comment { ...; string user_id; string system_id; ..};
+```
+
+#### B.2.2.3 Upper Case with Underscores
+
+The following categories of identifiers follow *Upper Case with Underscores* rules. All letters are in upper case and words have an underscore separating them.
+
+- Enum value
+- Constant
+
+Examples:
+
+```
+enum SubscriptionState {ACTIVE, SUSPENDED, INVALID};
+const string JOB_ID = "JOB_ID";
+```
+
+#### B.2.2.4 Naming IDL Sequence Types
+
+Typically a new type declared as an IDL sequence of another type will have the text "List" appended to the name of the base type. Another convention is to declare such types as unordered sequences or ordered sets for consistency with ASN.1 notation. In this case they should have the "Seq" or "Set" (instead of "List") appended respectively.
+
+Example of an "ordered set":
+
+```
+typedef sequence SubscriptionIdSet;
+```
+
+### B.2.3 Interface IRP
+
+Every Interface IRP should have 3 IDL modules (each specified in a separate IDL file):
+
+```
+module YyyIRPConstDefs {...}; // no change from Rel-5 practice.
+
+module YyyIRPSystem {...}; // no change from Rel-5 practice.
+
+module YyyIRPNotifications {...}; // new compared to Rel-5 practice
+```
+
+The first module defines all necessary IDL constructs, such as constant strings and type definitions, for the methods and notifications. The second module defines the methods. The third module defines the notifications.
+
+#### B.2.3.1 Constant String and Type Definitions
+
+This first module defines all necessary IDL constructs used by the methods (defined in the second module) and notifications (defined in the third module). The name of this module is YyyIRPConstDefs where Xxx is the name of the subject Interface IRP. An example is "PMIRPConstDefs".
+
+Within this module, define data types used in the methods.
+
+Also, define the data types of the attribute values used in the notifications.
+
+CORBA SS authors should always check the generic types defined in "ManagedGenericIRPConstDefs" before creating a new type.
+
+For the attribute names of the structured notifications, define an interface AttributeNameValue that captures the string definitions. Make sure these definitions do not clash with those defined for the notification header, i.e. notification id, event time, system DN, managed object class and managed object instance (see NotificationIRPNotification::Notify).
+
+An example from PMIRPConstDefs:
+
+```
+/**
+ * This block identifies attributes which are included as part of the
+ * PMIRP. These attribute values should not
+ * clash with those defined for the attributes of notification
+ * header (see IDL of Notification IRP).
+ */
+
+interface AttributeNameValue
+{
+ const string JOB_ID = "JOB_ID";
+ const string JOB_STATUS = "JOB_STATUS";
+ const string REASON = "REASON";
+ const string MONITOR_ID = "MONITOR_ID";
+ const string MONITOR_STATUS = "MONITOR_STATUS";
+};
+```
+
+#### B.2.3.2 Operations
+
+The second module defines the methods. The name of the module is `YyyIRPSystem` where `Yyy` is the name of the subject Interface IRP. An example is `AlarmIRPSystem`.
+
+At the beginning of this module, define all required exceptions. Naming conventions for exception are covered in B.2.2.1 above. CORBA SS authors should always check if the generic exceptions defined in the `ManagedGenericIRPSystem` can be reused before declaring new exception types.
+
+Then define one interface called `YyyIRP` encapsulating all methods of the subject `Yyy` Interface IRP. If the subject Interface IRP IS specifies that its `YyyIRP` inherits from `XxxIRP`, then reflect the inheritance relation in the interface definition. The following is an example of `AlarmIRP` that inherits from `ManagedGenericIRP`.
+
+```
+module AlarmIRPSystem
+{
+...
+...
+interface AlarmIRP : ManagedGenericIRPSystem:: ManagedGenericIRP {...};
+...
+};
+```
+
+Naming conventions for operations are covered in B.2.2.2 above.
+
+#### B.2.3.3 Notifications
+
+Use a separate module to define the notifications. The name the module is `YyyIRPNotifications` where `Yyy` is the name of the subject Interface IRP. Examples are `KernelCMIRPNotifications` and `PMIRPNotifications`.
+
+For `NotificationIRPNotifications`, do:
+
+- Define one IDL interface `Notify`. Capture the four constant strings that are the names of the four NV (name value) pairs of `filterable_body_field` of the CORBA structured event. These four CORBA NV pairs are mapped from the five notification header attributes (defined by the Notification IRP IS), i.e. the `objectClass`, `objectInstance`, `notificationId`, `eventTime` and `systemDN`.
+
+For `YyyIRPNotifications` where `Yyy` is not `Notification`, do:
+
+- At the beginning of this module, define the const strings for the notification types that correspond to the set of notifications specified by (and not inherited by and not imported by) the subject Interface IRP.
+- Then define a number of IDL interfaces corresponding to notifications specified in the subject Interface IRP. These interfaces should inherit from `NotificationIRPNotifications::Notify`. Within each interface, the first IDL statement defines the notification type (that is used as the second field of the fixed header of the structured notification). The second and subsequent IDL statements define the attribute names of this notification type, excepting those already defined by `NotificationIRPNotifications::Notify`. The data type of the attribute value, which is defined in `YyyIRPConstDefs`, should be mentioned in the comment block of this IDL statement.
+- Then define a number of IDL interfaces corresponding to notifications imported, if any. These interfaces should inherit from the imported interface. An example is `interface NotifyObjectCreation : KernelCMIRPNotifications::NotifyObjectCreation`. Within this interface, define all necessary IDL constructs, if any, which are not defined in the imported interface. This interface may contain no IDL statement if the IDL constructs defined in the imported interface are sufficient. For each interface imported, insert a comment "The first field of this notification carries the IRPVersion of this CORBA SS."
+- There is no need to re-define interfaces for notifications that are already specified in other Interface IRP, and from which the subject IRP inherits.
+
+The following is an extract from `PMIRPNotifications`.
+
+```
+module PMIRPNotifications
+{
+ const string ET_MEASUREMENT_JOB_STATUS_CHANGED = "notifyMeasurementJobStatusChanged";
+ const string ET_THRESHOLD_MONITOR_STATUS_CHANGED = "notifyThresholdMonitorStatusChanged";
+
+ interface NotifyMeasurementJobStatusChanged: NotificationIRPNotifications::Notify
+ {
+ const string EVENT_TYPE = ET_MEASUREMENT_JOB_STATUS_CHANGED;
+
+ /**
+ * This constant defines the name of the jobId property,
+ * which is transported in the filterable_body fields.
+ * The data type for the value of this property
+ * is PMIRPConstDefs::JobIdType.
+ */
+ const string JOB_ID = PMIRPConstDefs::AttributeNameValue::JOB_ID;
+
+ ...
+ ...
+ };
+
+ interface NotifyXXX : NotificationIRPNotifications::Notify
+ {
+ ...
+ };
+
+ ...
+};
+```
+
+### B.2.4 NRM IRP
+
+Use one module to define the IDL constructs for the managed object classes. The name of this module is XxxNRIRPConstDefs where Xxx is the name of the subject NRM IRP.
+
+An example is UtranNRIRPConstDefs.
+
+Within the module, define a set of IDL interfaces each of which corresponds to a managed object class specified. The interface definition respects the inheritance relation specified.
+
+After the interface definition, the type definition for each attribute defined for the managed object class is defined (including inherited attributes). The type is defined in one of two ways:
+
+- 1) With a typedef of the type that matches the attribute definition in the NRM Information Object Class (IOC) mapping table, or
+- 2) With a CORBA IDL comment if the same attribute name is already defined in managed object classes already defined in this NRM.
+
+An example of managed object class RncFunction, which inherits from GenericNRIRPConstDefs::ManagedFunction, is shown below.
+
+```
+module UtranNRIRPConstDefs
+{
+ ...
+
+ /**
+ * Definitions for MO class RncFunction
+ */
+ interface RncFunction : GenericNRIRPConstDefs::ManagedFunction
+ {
+ const string CLASS = "RncFunction";
+
+ // Attribute Names
+ //
+ const string rncFunctionId = "rncFunctionId";
+
+ const string mcc= "mcc";
+ const string mnc= "mnc";
+ const string rncId= "rncId";
+ };
+
+ typedef string rncFunctionId;
+ typedef long mcc;
+ typedef long mnc;
+ typedef long rncId;
+ // userLabel
+ ...
+};
+```
+
+# --- Annex C (normative): Technology specific rules & guidelines for SOAP SSs
+
+## C.1 Rules
+
+### C.1.1 Introduction
+
+The intent of this annex is threefold.
+
+- 1) The first intent is for 3GPP internal use to document how a 3GPP SOAP SS is produced and how it is structured.
+- 2) The second intent with the annex is to give the reader or implementer of a SOAP SS a better understanding on how to interpret the SOAP SS specification.
+- 3) The third and maybe most important intent is to put requirement on an implementer of a SOAP SS.
+
+It is expected that this annex is to be extended in later versions of the present document.
+
+### C.1.2 Rules for specification of SOAP Solution Sets
+
+#### C.1.2.1 Introduction
+
+This subclause identifies rules for specification of SOAP SSs. This subclause is mainly for 3GPP-internal use. It is only for information for the implementer of a SOAP SS.
+
+#### C.1.2.2 File names
+
+The WSDL files should follow the naming convention:
+
+WSDLTarget.wsdl
+
+with:
+
+WSDLTarget being the text after the character '#' in the target namespace of the definitions
+
+Examples:
+
+If the 3GPP WSDL document contains
+
+,
+
+then the WSDL filename shall be `KernelCMIRPSystem.wsdl`.
+
+If the WSDL document contains
+
+,
+
+then the WSDL filename shall be `AlarmIRPSystem.wsdl`.
+
+#### C.1.2.3 Void
+
+#### C.1.2.4 XML version encoding
+
+The first line of each wsdl and xsd file shall indicate the XML version and encoding. The supported XML version is defined in the subject TS. The supporting encoding is UTF-8 (refer to [16]).
+
+Therefore, an example for the wsdl and xsd file is :
+
+```
+
+```
+
+#### C.1.2.5 Namespaces
+
+The WSDL namespace URI shall follow the naming convention:
+
+```
+http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/specs/archive/IRP_series/IRPNumber#SchemaName
+```
+
+with:
+
+- IRP\_series is the 3GPP specification series;
+- IRPNumber is the number before the 3GPP document version number, corresponding to the 3GPP document which defines the resource;
+- SchemaName is the name of the WSDL specification or the name of the XML Schema in which the resource is defined.
+
+Examples:
+
+The 3GPP document "3GPP TS 32.111-6 V11.0.0 (2012-09)" defines the resource "AlarmIRPSystem". It defines the WSDL specification "AlarmIRPSystem.wsdl" in which the resource AlarmIRPSystem is defined. Then the namespace URI shall be:
+
+```
+http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/specs/archive/32_series/32.111-6#AlarmIRPSystem
+```
+
+The 3GPP document "3GPP TS 28.623 V11.1.0 (2013-06)" defines the resource "SubNetwork". It defines the XML schema "genericNrm.xsd" in which the resource SubNetwork is defined. Then the namespace URI shall be:
+
+```
+http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/specs/archive/28_series/28.623#genericNrm
+```
+
+```
+http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/specs/archive/32_series/32.127#AAMIRPData
+```
+
+### C.1.3 Implementation aspects of Interface IRP SOAP Solution Sets
+
+#### C.1.3.1 Introduction
+
+This subclause identifies rules for the implementation of SOAP SSs. This subclause is normative for the implementer of a SOAP SS.
+
+#### C.1.3.n XXXX rule
+
+## C.2 Guidelines (Style Guide for SOAP SS WSDL)
+
+This subclause describes the style guide for writing WSDL documents for Interface IRP.
+
+The guide sets out consistent naming, structural conventions and usage of SS interface for the WSDL in IRP SOAP SS specifications.
+
+### C.2.1 File structure
+
+The structure of the wsdl file shall follow the W3C WSDL Document Structure defined in [10] specifications.
+
+#### C.2.1.1 Definitions
+
+*Guidelines for the Definitions section.*
+
+#### C.2.1.2 Namespaces
+
+*Guidelines for the Namespaces section.*
+
+#### C.2.1.3 Documentation
+
+*Guidelines for the optional Documentation section.*
+
+#### C.2.1.4 Types
+
+*Guidelines for Types*
+
+#### C.2.1.5 Message
+
+*Guidelines for Messages*
+
+#### C.2.1.6 Port type
+
+*Guidelines for Port types*
+
+#### C.2.1.7 Binding
+
+*Guidelines for Bindings*
+
+#### C.2.1.8 Port
+
+*Guidelines for Ports*
+
+#### C.2.1.9 Service
+
+*Guidelines for Services*
+
+### C.2.2 Identifiers
+
+#### C.2.2.n Rule n
+
+*Identify the categories of identifiers which follow the Rule n rules.*
+
+## --- C.3 XML Schema Guidelines
+
+This subclause describes the style guide for writing XML Schema for Operation/Notification messages and parameters to be imported into the WSDL file for the IRP SOAP SS specifications.
+
+### C.3.1 XSD guidelines for messages definition
+
+#### C.3.1.1 Request message
+
+*Guidelines for the Request message.*
+
+#### C.3.1.2 Response messages
+
+*Guidelines for the Response messages.*
+
+#### C.3.1.3 Fault messages
+
+*Guidelines for the Fault messages.*
+
+### C.3.2 XSD guidelines for parameters definition
+
+#### C.3.1.1 General guidelines
+
+*General guidelines for the parameters definitions.*
+
+##### C.3.1.1.1 Simple type definitions
+
+*Guidelines for the simple type definitions.*
+
+#### C.3.1.2 Complex type definition
+
+*Guidelines for the complex type.*
+
+### C.3.3 Identifiers
+
+The identifiers should follow the rules defined in paragraph C.2.2.
+
+# Annex D (normative): Technology specific rules & guidelines for XML specifications
+
+## D.1 Rules
+
+### D.1.1 XSD Use Cases
+
+#### D.1.1.1 Background
+
+3GPP defines a number of IOCs, say in Release-N. 3GPP also defines an XSD schema that can capture these IOCs, in Release-N.
+
+Release-N+1 authors can/may also extend these Release-N IOCs to capture the newly agreed capabilities and publish them as Release-N+1 IOCs. Authors also define a Release-N+1 XSD schema.
+
+The Use Cases here illustrate the capabilities of the Release-N+1 XSD schema.
+
+The "?" in the Use Case tables are for further study.
+
+#### D.1.1.2 Use Cases Set 1
+
+Suppose the old-XSD has SubNetwork (SN) containing ManagedElement (ME).
+
+Suppose the new-XSD has enhanced-SN containing enhanced-ME.
+
+Suppose we want the XML-instance-documents (doc-1, doc-2, etc) to contain instances as identified below:
+
+- Doc-1 has SN instance containing ME instances
+- Doc-2 has SN instance containing enhanced-ME instances
+- Doc-3 has SN instance containing ME instances and enhanced-ME instances
+- Doc-4 has enhanced-SN containing enhanced-ME instances
+- Doc-5 has enhanced-SN containing ME instances
+- Doc-6 has enhanced-SN containing enhanced-ME instances and ME instances
+
+Can a XML-instance-doc-creator (IRPAgent or IRPManager) produce the doc (column) using the XSD (row) identified?
+
+| | Doc-1 | Doc-2 | Doc-3 | Doc-4 | Doc-5 | Doc-6 |
+|---------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
+| Old-XSD | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
+| New-XSD | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
+
+Can a XML-instance-doc-reader (IRPAgent or IRPManager) validate the doc (i.e. confirm that the document is well-formed) (column) using the XSD (row) identified?
+
+| | Doc-1 | Doc-2 | Doc-3 | Doc-4 | Doc-5 | Doc-6 |
+|---------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
+| Old-XSD | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
+| New-XSD | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
+
+#### D.1.1.3 Use Cases Set 2
+
+Suppose one old-XSD has SubNetwork (SN) containing ManagedElement (ME) that in turn, contained an RNCFunction (RNC) defined by the other Old-XSD.
+
+Suppose the new-XSD has enhanced-SN containing enhanced-ME. Suppose also another new-XSD has enhanced-RNC.
+
+- Doc-7 has ME instance containing RNC instances
+- Doc-8 has ME instances containing enhanced-RNC instances
+- Doc-9 has ME instances containing RNC instances and enhanced-RNC instances
+- Doc-10 has enhanced-ME instances containing enhanced-RNC instances
+- Doc-11 has enhanced-ME instances containing RNC instances
+- Doc-12 has enhanced-ME instances containing RNC instances and enhanced-RNC instances
+
+Can a XML-instance-doc creator (IRPAgent or IRPManager) produce the doc (column) using the XSD (row) identified?
+
+| | Doc-7 | Doc-8 | Doc-9 | Doc-10 | Doc-11 | Doc-12 |
+|---------|-------|-------|-------|--------|--------|--------|
+| Old-XSD | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
+| New-XSD | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
+
+Can a reader (IRPAgent or IRPManager) validate the doc (i.e. confirm that the document is well-formed) (column) using the XSD (row) identified?
+
+| | Doc-1 | Doc-2 | Doc-3 | Doc-4 | Doc-5 | Doc-6 |
+|---------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
+| Old-XSD | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
+| New-XSD | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
+
+### D.1.2 Rules for NRM IRP XML specification extensions
+
+Void
+
+### D.1.3 XML version encoding
+
+The first line of each XML schema description file shall indicate the XML version and encoding. The supported XML version is specified in the subject TS. The supported encoding is UTF-8 (refer to [16]).
+
+Therefore, an example for xsd file is:
+
+```
+
+```
+
+## --- D.2 Guidelines
+
+Void
+
+# Annex E (informative): Change history
+
+| Change history | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------|-------|-----------|------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|--------|
+| Date | TSG # | TSG Doc. | CR | Rev | Subject/Comment | Cat | Old | New |
+| Mar 2008 | SA_39 | SP-080070 | -- | -- | Submitted to SA#39 for Information | -- | -- | 1.0.0 |
+| Mar 2009 | SA-43 | SP-090057 | -- | -- | Submitted to SA for approval | -- | 2.0.0 | 8.0.0 |
+| Dec 2009 | SA_46 | SP-090719 | 001 | -- | Discontinuation of the maintenance of WSDL/XML schema folders | F | 8.0.0 | 9.0.0 |
+| Jun 2010 | SA_48 | SP-100264 | 002 | -- | New rule for WSDL namespace URIs | F | 9.0.0 | 10.0.0 |
+| Sep 2010 | SA_49 | SP-100489 | 003 | -- | Change rule for WSDL filenames | F | 10.0.0 | 10.1.0 |
+| 2012-09 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-11 version (MCC) | | 10.1.0 | 11.0.0 |
+| 2014-09 | SA-65 | SP-140558 | 004 | - | Name space URI convention | F | 11.0.0 | 11.1.0 |
+| 2014-10 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-12 version (MCC) | | 11.1.0 | 12.0.0 |
+| 2016-01 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-13 version (MCC) | | 12.0.0 | 13.0.0 |
+| 2016-03 | SA_71 | SP-160032 | 0010 | - | Correcting references | A | 13.0.0 | 13.1.0 |
+| 2017-03 | SA#75 | - | - | - | Promotion to Release 14 without technical change | | 13.1.0 | 14.0.0 |
+
+| Change history | | | | | | | |
+|----------------|---------|-----------|------|-----|-----|--------------------------------|---------------|
+| Date | Meeting | TDoc | CR | Rev | Cat | Subject/Comment | New version |
+| 2018-01 | SA#78 | SP-170964 | 0011 | - | F | Update erroneous references | 14.1.0 |
+| 2018-12 | - | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-15 version (MCC) | 15.0.0 |
+| 2020-07 | - | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-16 version (MCC) | 16.0.0 |
+| 2022-03 | - | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-17 version (MCC) | 17.0.0 |
+| 2024-04 | - | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-18 version (MCC) | 18.0.0 |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/1eadbbe42cfcac5c0023577110aec5e3_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/1eadbbe42cfcac5c0023577110aec5e3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b492cd0ce4f3023499d07632661275ffa44f69db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/1eadbbe42cfcac5c0023577110aec5e3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c90e9cc07e3b60c25d28f4df7b9817241f27c78504fa00f1e69eb687db4ea8c8
+size 67465
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/367926125450c2bc3f4bdca9d59a62ba_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/367926125450c2bc3f4bdca9d59a62ba_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e2ceb297ba7a7e200445bdcd8dcf6b89cfe75eb2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/367926125450c2bc3f4bdca9d59a62ba_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6e876a27a990d86cc8f4231b6bd0c3e93cbea03a277b6dbba58588c13c7b78ba
+size 60429
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4de7dd97b9337b3aaf072e746405ad520d5d45de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8b42d116d8c2d814c86377d52a84e0f5d4ef04fd6b66457e5edf7e3dd2ea4cb7
+size 9370
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1134c67760259e845c8960324505f060a9d0eece
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:125561d2e36a3dc18f4be88d0a06d2f7e62e1484de9ef2d52e22787082d633e9
+size 5524
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/7affafe7362a2d2d072e9d4bf515f0bb_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/7affafe7362a2d2d072e9d4bf515f0bb_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4bd7fc4941c8a4f1ca7444dff66df264dc2c7682
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/7affafe7362a2d2d072e9d4bf515f0bb_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e157a7d8dec99e918cbb4c5b3aaf931da8bca513480fad02fc38679cc8d2c30e
+size 29254
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/ddc7460821484f1ae2835c67955c554c_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/ddc7460821484f1ae2835c67955c554c_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0ce5db8281e2f23e42e18733077a56c456e1e913
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/ddc7460821484f1ae2835c67955c554c_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e59d7c214adbc92c0afc1313edcf29502bb77742817fe2d655f392a1411d198c
+size 63419
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/raw.md b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..30a9f22ff836c8b71ba2ccd9e9e6871e5b667466
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32154/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,402 @@
+
+
+# 3GPP TS 32.154 V18.0.0 (2024-04) ---
+
+*Technical Specification*
+
+## **3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Backward and Forward Compatibility (BFC); Concept and definitions (Release 18)**
+
+
+
+---
+
+The logo for 5G Advanced, featuring a stylized '5G' with a green signal wave icon above the 'G' and the word 'ADVANCED' in smaller letters to the right.
+
+5G ADVANCED logo
+
+
+
+The 3GPP logo, consisting of the letters '3GPP' in a bold, black, stylized font. Below the 'P' is a red signal wave icon. Underneath the logo, the text 'A GLOBAL INITIATIVE' is written in a smaller, all-caps font.
+
+3GPP logo
+
+## --- **Keywords**
+
+GSM, UMTS, management
+
+### **3GPP**
+
+### --- **Postal address**
+
+### --- **3GPP support office address**
+
+650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis
+Valbonne - FRANCE
+Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16
+
+### --- **Internet**
+
+
+
+## --- **Copyright Notification**
+
+No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.
+The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
+
+© 2024, 3GPP Organizational Partners (ARIB, ATIS, CCSA, ETSI, TSDSI, TTA, TTC).
+All rights reserved.
+
+UMTSTM is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its members
+3GPP™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
+LTE™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
+GSM® and the GSM logo are registered and owned by the GSM Association
+
+## --- Contents
+
+| | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|
+| Foreword ..... | 4 |
+| Introduction ..... | 4 |
+| 1 Scope..... | 5 |
+| 2 References..... | 5 |
+| 3 Definitions and abbreviations ..... | 5 |
+| 3.1 Definitions..... | 5 |
+| 3.2 Abbreviations ..... | 6 |
+| 4 BC between 3GPP TS 32-series specifications..... | 6 |
+| 4.1 Prerequisite..... | 6 |
+| 4.2 Rules..... | 7 |
+| 5 BC context..... | 8 |
+| 5.1 General ..... | 8 |
+| 5.2 IRP level..... | 9 |
+| 5.3 IRP Agent level ..... | 10 |
+| 6 BC Recommendations..... | 12 |
+| 6.1 Requirement ..... | 12 |
+| 6.2 IS-level ..... | 12 |
+| 6.3 SS-level ..... | 12 |
+| 6.3.1 CORBA ..... | 12 |
+| 6.3.2 Void ..... | 12 |
+| 6.3.3 File format description XML..... | 12 |
+| 6.3.4 File format description ASN.1 ..... | 12 |
+| 6.3.5 SOAP ..... | 12 |
+| Annex A (informative): BC and Conformance Tests..... | 13 |
+| Annex B (informative): Change history..... | 14 |
+
+# --- Foreword
+
+This Technical Specification has been produced by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).
+
+The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within the TSG and may change following formal TSG approval. Should the TSG modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by the TSG with an identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows:
+
+Version x.y.z
+
+where:
+
+- x the first digit:
+ - 1 presented to TSG for information;
+ - 2 presented to TSG for approval;
+ - 3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control.
+- y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections, updates, etc.
+- z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document.
+
+# --- Introduction
+
+The Itf-N partitions two groups of interacting entities called IRPManager(s) and IRPAgent(s).
+
+The interactions between an IRPManager and IRPAgent are specified by the set of IRP specifications the IRPAgent supports, and which the IRPManager uses.
+
+Each YyyIRP (where "Yyy" stands for Alarm, BasicCM, etc.) permits a manager to, via `getIRPVersion`, inspect it's supported IRPVersion(s). Each such IRPVersion uniquely identifies one supported Interface IRP SS.
+
+Each YyyIRP may also permit an IRPManager to, via `getNRMIRPVersions`, inspect it's supported NRM IRPVersion(s). Each such IRPVersion uniquely identifies one supported NRM IRP SS.
+
+The 3GPP IRP specifications are expected to evolve. For example, 3GPP Release 6 specifications include more or modified features compared to the corresponding set in Release 5.
+
+An IRPManager and IRPAgent, with implementations conformant to the same IRP specification (at the same IRPVersion(s)) will be able to communicate.
+
+However, an upgrade of the IRPVersion, if not performed by both IRPAgent and IRPManager, can result in inter-working failure if Backward Compatibility (BC) issues are not addressed.
+
+The present document is applicable/relevant to a system context of a group of interacting IRPManagers and IRPAgents where some members are using one IRPVersion while others are using an upgraded IRPVersion.
+
+# --- 1 Scope
+
+The present document gives recommendations to develop future IRP specifications in a Backward Compatible (BC) way so that the group of IRPManager(s) and IRPAgent(s) are not forced to be upgraded in lock step.
+
+The business case for supporting such group, as described above, is complex. It may not relate to the functions of the supported IRPs alone. Rather, it can relate to the cost of coordination of IRPVersion upgrades, the cost of maintaining an old IRPVersion and the cost of using single-vendor or multi-vendor IRPAgents. These considerations are operator deployment scenarios specific.
+
+Clause 4 specifies the Recommendations and clause 5 describes the system context where the Recommendations are applicable.
+
+**Editor's Note:** The “forward compatibility” part is FFS.
+
+# --- 2 References
+
+The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present document.
+
+- References are either specific (identified by date of publication and/or edition number or version number) or non-specific.
+ - For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.
+ - For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document *in the same Release as the present document*.
+- [1] 3GPP TS 32.101: "Telecommunication management; Principles and high level requirements".
+- [2] 3GPP TS 32.102: "Telecommunication management; Architecture".
+- [3] 3GPP TS 32.111-2: "Telecommunication management; Fault Management; Part 2: Alarm Integration Reference Point (IRP): Information Service (IS)".
+- [4] 3GPP TS 32.311: "Telecommunication management; Generic Integration Reference Point (IRP) management; Requirements".
+
+# --- 3 Definitions and abbreviations
+
+## 3.1 Definitions
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the following terms and definitions apply:
+
+**Element Manager (EM):** See 3GPP TS 32.101 [1].
+
+**IRPAgent:** See 3GPP TS 32.102 [2].
+
+**IRPManager:** See 3GPP TS 32.102 [2].
+
+**IRPVersion:** See "IRP document version number string" or "IRPVersion" in 3GPP TS 32.311 [4] clause 3.1.
+
+**Network Manager (NM):** See 3GPP TS 32.101 [1].
+
+## 3.2 Abbreviations
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the following abbreviations apply:
+
+| | |
+|-------|-------------------------------------------------------|
+| ASN.1 | Abstract Syntax Notation One |
+| BC | Backward Compatible or Backward Compatibility |
+| CMIP | Common Management Information Protocol |
+| CORBA | Common Object Request Broker Architecture |
+| EM | Element Manager |
+| IS | Information Service |
+| IRP | Integration Reference Point |
+| NE | Network Element |
+| NM | Network Manager |
+| NRM | Network Resource Model |
+| VSE | Vendor Specific Extension (to 3GPP IRP specification) |
+| SS | Solution Set |
+| XML | eXtensible Markup Language |
+
+# --- 4 BC between 3GPP TS 32-series specifications
+
+## 4.1 Prerequisite
+
+The words old and new, when qualifying an IRPVersion, refer to a single Interface IRPVersion of the same kind, e.g. Alarm IRP. They also refer to NRM IRPVersion of the same kind, e.g. Core NRM. The 'new' refers to a later release compared to the 'old'.
+
+The words old and new, when qualifying an IRPManager, refer to an entity that is using the old or the new (Interface or NRM) IRPVersion.
+
+The words old and new, when qualifying an IRPAgent, refer to an entity that contains an IRP that is supporting the old or the new (Interface or NRM) IRPVersion.
+
+In majority cases, an IRPAgent instance contains multiple IRPs, each of which is using a particular Interface IRPVersion. In these cases, each Recommendation statement should be repeated to cover all IRPs involved.
+
+The Recommendations do not imply that equipment vendors shall always supply their new IRPAgents in compliance to the solutions satisfying the Recommendations. The Recommendations simply identify the expected behaviours of a new system when it, claiming BC, interacts with an old system. Whether or not an IRPAgent should satisfy the Recommendations is a decision of the equipment vendor/supplier.
+
+The Recommendations do not imply that the next release of 3GPP Interface IRP or NRM IRP specification must be BC (to the older one). Whether or not a new release of an Interface IRP or NRM IRP should be BC to its older version is a decision of the 3GPP specification author, on a case-by-case basis.
+
+## 4.2 Rules
+
+[REC-1] An old IRPManager inter-operates with an old IRPAgent-A and a new IRPAgent-B.
+
+The interaction shall be successful in that the IRPManager can obtain the network management services (capabilities and features) defined by the old IRPVersion from both IRPAgents.
+
+The IRPManager needs not have knowledge of new network management services defined by the new IRPVersion.
+
+[REC-2] A new IRPManager inter-operates with a new IRPAgent-A and an old IRPAgent-B.
+
+The interaction shall be successful in that the IRPManager can obtain the network management services defined by (a) the new IRPVersion from IRPAgent-A and (b) the old IRPVersion from IRPAgent-B.
+
+NOTE: If the next minor and/or major release of 3GPP Interface IRP or NRM IRP specification is BC (to the older one), one could reduce or eliminate the difficult coordination task to introduce IRPVersion upgrades in a large management domain containing multiple IRPManagers and IRPAgents.
+It can be more cost-effective if IRPVersion upgrades to individual entity (i.e. IRPManager and IRPAgent) are done at different times.
+
+# 5 BC context
+
+## 5.1 General
+
+This clause defines the context under which the requirements specified in the present document are applicable.
+
+The word 'old' qualifies the related entity (i.e. the AlarmIRP of an IRP Agent instance or Alarm IRP Manager) that is using an older 3GPP IRP Version (called old version). The word 'new' qualifies the related entity that is using a newer (upgraded) 3GPP IRP Version.
+
+EXAMPLE: A hypothetical 3GPP TS 32.123 V6.0.0 is considered the old version with reference to 3GPP TS 32.123 V6.1.0. The two versions in question can belong to the same or different major releases (e.g. Rel-5 or Rel-6).
+
+The box labelled EM in figure 5.1 conveys the same idea as the box of the same label in the System Context-A of other IRP specifications such as Alarm IRP IS 3GPP TS 32.111-2 [3].
+
+One or all EM-labelled boxes of figure 5.1 can be interchanged with the NE-labelled box (see System Context-B of other IRP specifications such as Alarm IRP IS 3GPP TS 32.111-2 [3]). The NE entities are not shown in order to make the figure easier to read.
+
+
+
+Figure 5.1: Overall BC System Context diagram. The diagram shows four boxes representing entities: 'Old IRPManager' (NM), 'New IRPManager' (NM), 'New IRP Agent' (EM), and 'Old IRP Agent' (EM). A vertical dashed line labeled 'Itf-N' runs down the center, separating the Manager entities on the left from the Agent entities on the right. Horizontal lines connect the Old IRPManager to the Old IRP Agent and the New IRPManager to the New IRP Agent. Diagonal lines cross the Itf-N interface, connecting the Old IRPManager to the New IRP Agent and the New IRPManager to the Old IRP Agent.
+
+**Figure 5.1: Overall BC System Context**
+
+In general, an IRP Agent instance may contain several Interface YyyIRP instances and associated supporting Yyy NRM IRPs (where one IRP can be for example Alarm IRP, Test Management IRP, or "Notification IRP", etc and where the other IRP can be for example Generic IRP). The Interface and NRM YyyIRP specifications of particular IRP Version(s) together specify the behaviour of an Interface IRP and the supporting NRM IRP(s).
+
+NOTE: The IRP Version concept is related to the IRP.
+The IRP Version concept is not related to the IRP Agent as this may contain multiple IRPs.
+
+Given this background, the BC issues are addressed at two separate but related levels as described in clauses 5.2 and 5.3.
+
+## 5.2 IRP level
+
+The two diagrams here illustrate conceptually the two possible contexts when we address BC at this IRP level.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates two system contexts for BC at the IRP level. Both contexts show a Network Manager (NM) on the left and an Element Manager (EM) on the right, separated by an interface labeled 'Itf-N'.
+
+In the top context, the NM contains two boxes: 'Old IRPManager' and 'New IRPManager'. The 'Old IRPManager' is connected to the 'Itf-N' interface. The 'New IRPManager' is connected to the 'Old IRPManager' and also to the 'Itf-N' interface. The EM contains two boxes: 'YyyIRP IRPVersion-new' and 'IRP Agent'. The 'YyyIRP IRPVersion-new' is connected to the 'Itf-N' interface and to the 'IRP Agent'.
+
+In the bottom context, the NM contains a box labeled 'Old IRPManager', which is connected to the 'Itf-N' interface. The EM contains two boxes: 'YyyIRP IRPVersion-old' and 'IRP Agent'. The 'YyyIRP IRPVersion-old' is connected to the 'Itf-N' interface and to the 'IRP Agent'.
+
+Figure 5.2: Specification BC System Context. The diagram consists of two parts. The top part shows an 'Old IRPManager' and a 'New IRPManager' (both in NM) connected via an 'Itf-N' interface to a 'YyyIRP IRPVersion-new' and an 'IRP Agent' (both in EM). The bottom part shows an 'Old IRPManager' (in NM) connected via an 'Itf-N' interface to a 'YyyIRP IRPVersion-old' and an 'IRP Agent' (both in EM).
+
+**Figure 5.2: Specification BC System Context**
+
+An YyyIRP instance supports a particular Interface IRPVersion and a particular set of NRM IRPVersions.
+An IRPManager uses a particular Interface IRPVersion and a particular set of NRM IRPVersions.
+
+If an YyyIRP instance supports Interface IRPVersion-X and NRM IRPVersions-Y, then it can interact successfully with an IRPManager that uses the same IRPVersions. This is illustrated by the case of the "Old IRPManager" and the "Old IRPAgent" of the bottom diagram (and note that the diagram does not show the NRM IRP version support).
+
+If this same YyyIRP instance upgrades its Interface IRPVersion-X to X2 that is BC to X, then it can interact successfully with an IRPManager that uses the Interface IRPVersion-X or IRPVersion-X2. The top diagram of figure 5.2 illustrates this case (and note that the diagram does not show the NRM IRP version support).
+
+If this same YyyIRP instance upgrades its NRM IRPVersion-Y to Y2 that is BC to Y, then it can interact successfully with an IRPManager that uses the NRM IRPVersion-Y or NRM IRPVersion-Y2. The top diagram of figure 5.2 illustrated this case (and note that the diagram does not show the NRM IRP version support).
+
+Given the above, the BC issues addressed at the present document level are:
+
+- How to determine if an IRP IS or SS specification (Interface IRP or NRM IRP) is BC to an earlier version ? This can be addressed in another way.
+
+What are the BC-rules that the author of a 3GPP IRP specification should use to extend an old-version to produce a new version that can claim BC (to that old-version) ?
+
+At this level, the specification author shall define BC-rules for each of the following:
+
+- Interface IRP- Requirements.
+- Interface IRP IS.
+- Interface IRP SS(s).
+- NRM IRP requirements.
+- NRM IRP IS.
+- NRM IRP SS(s).
+- Data Definition IRP IS.
+- Data Definition IRP SS(s).
+
+One reason why the specification author addresses BC at this IRP level is that, for certain technologies, such as CORBA, it is possible that one entity using (compiles with) one IRP SS specification (i.e. the CORBA SS) while the other communicating entity using a new but BC version can interact successfully (such as the case of the IRPManager and IRPAgent-A of [REC-1]).
+
+## 5.3 IRPAgent level
+
+Figure 5.3 illustrates the two possible contexts when addressing BC at this IRPAgent level.
+
+
+
+The diagram consists of two parts. The top part shows two Network Management (NM) boxes on the left, labeled 'Old IRPManager' and 'New IRPManager'. Both are connected via a common interface 'Itf-N' (indicated by a vertical dashed line) to two separate boxes on the right. These boxes are part of an Environment Management (EM) system and contain 'YyyIRP IRPVersion-old' and 'YyyIRP IRPVersion-new' respectively, each connected to an 'IRPAgent' box. The bottom part shows a single NM box labeled 'Old IRPManager' connected via 'Itf-N' to one EM box containing 'YyyIRP IRPVersion-old' connected to an 'IRPAgent' box.
+
+Two diagrams illustrating system contexts for IRPAgent level BC. The top diagram shows 'Old IRPManager' and 'New IRPManager' (both NM) connected via 'Itf-N' to two 'IRPAgent' boxes (both EM) labeled 'YyyIRP IRPVersion-old' and 'YyyIRP IRPVersion-new'. The bottom diagram shows 'Old IRPManager' (NM) connected via 'Itf-N' to one 'IRPAgent' box (EM) labeled 'YyyIRP IRPVersion-old'.
+
+Figure 5.3: System/Implementation BC System Context
+
+NOTE 1: An IRP Agent instance contains multiple YyyIRP instances such as AlarmIRP, NotificationIRP, TestManagementIRP, etc. Each YyyIRP instance implements/supports the corresponding YyyIRP specification of a particular IRPVersion.
+
+Suppose IRP Agent-A contains YyyIRP of Interface IRPVersion-4, YyyIRP of Interface IRPVersion-5 and YyyIRP of Interface IRPVersion-6 and all IRPs support NRM IRPVersion-7 (see Note 2), this IRP Agent-A is BC if it can inter-operate successfully with the following:
+
+- IRP Manager 1 using Interface IRPVersion-4 or 3 using NRM IRPVersion-7 or 6.
+- IRP Manager 2 using Interface IRPVersion-5 or 4 using NRM IRPVersion-7 or 6.
+- IRP Manager 3 using Interface IRPVersion-6 or 5 using NRM IRPVersion-7 or 6.
+
+NOTE 2: All IRPs contained by the same IRP Agent instance should support the same set of NRM IRP Versions.
+
+It is anticipated that the IRP Agent level BC solution includes:
+
+- An IRP Agent service allowing IRP Manager to discover all the IRP Agent supported Interface IRPVersion(s).
+- An IRP Agent service allowing IRP Manager to discover the IRP Agent supported NRM IRPVersion(s).
+- An IRP Agent service allowing IRP Manager to discover the reference/address of the IRP instance (of the IRP Agent) supporting a particular Interface IRPVersion.
+
+The two diagrams in figure 5.3 illustrate the two possible ways to support BC at this so-called IRP Agent level.
+
+The IRPVersion-new needs not to be BC to IRPVersion-old. In the case that IRPVersion-new is BC to IRPVersion-old, it is EM supplier's choice if "IRP level" or "IRP Agent level" solution will be used to support BC. In the case that the IRPVersion-new is not BC to IRPVersion-old, then the EM supplier will have no choice but to use "IRP Agent level" solution if it wants its EM to support BC.
+
+NOTE 3: IRP Agent service supporting "discovery" (as stated by the above three bullets) is not illustrated in the two diagrams
+
+# --- 6 BC Recommendations
+
+## 6.1 Requirement
+
+The Requirement specification is in subclause 4.2 Rules.
+
+## 6.2 IS-level
+
+There is no text specifically written related to IS-level specification for BC systems. The two system context diagrams of subclauses 5.2 and 5.3 would be necessary and sufficient to describe the management services provided by EM to support the so-called Old IRPManager and New IRPManager.
+
+## 6.3 SS-level
+
+### 6.3.1 CORBA
+
+For CORBA Solution Set, the IRPAgent level (see subclause 5.3) context would be used.
+
+### 6.3.2 Void
+
+### 6.3.3 File format description XML
+
+*Editor's Note: This part is FFS.*
+
+### 6.3.4 File format description ASN.1
+
+*Editor's Note: This part is FFS.*
+
+### 6.3.5 SOAP
+
+*Editor's Note: This part is FFS.*
+
+# Annex A (informative): BC and Conformance Tests
+
+This annex illustrates that:
+
+- an IRP, implementing a new-version IRP specification that is BC to an old-version IRP specification, may or may not be compliant to the old-version IRP specification.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ OVS[Old-version IRP specification] -- "extend, based on BC-Rules" --> NVS[New-version IRP specification]
+ OIRP[Old-IRP] -- implement --> OVS
+ NIRP[New-IRP] -- implement --> NVS
+ CTO[Conformance tests] -- depend --> OVS
+ CTN[Conformance tests] -- depend --> NVS
+ OIRP -- "test (should be OK)" --> CTO
+ NIRP -- "test (should be OK)" --> CTN
+ NIRP -- "test (should fail)" --> CTO
+
+```
+
+Diagram illustrating the BC and Conformance Tests Scenario. It shows two parallel tracks: Old-version and New-version. 'Old-version IRP specification' is extended to 'New-version IRP specification' based on BC-Rules. 'Old-IRP' implements 'Old-version IRP specification' and is tested against 'Conformance tests' (should be OK), which depend on the 'Old-version IRP specification'. 'New-IRP' implements 'New-version IRP specification' and is tested against its own 'Conformance tests' (should be OK). A diagonal arrow shows 'New-IRP' being tested against the old 'Conformance tests' with the label 'test (should fail)'.
+
+**Figure A.1: BC and Conformance Tests Scenario**
+
+Suppose 3GPP has an older-version IRP specification (the "Old-version IRP specification" box) and there is a valid/correct implementation (the "Old-IRP" box).
+Suppose also that 3GPP produce a "New-version IRP specification" by extending the "Old-version IRP specification" using the BC-rules.
+
+The "New-IRP" should interwork with IRPManager that uses the "New-version IRP specification".
+This "New-IRP" should also interwork with IRPManager that uses the "Old-version IRP specification".
+
+The "Old-IRP" should pass the conformance test that is based on (see "depend" relation) the "Old-version IRP specification".
+Likewise, the "New-IRP" should pass the conformance test that is based on the "New-version IRP specification".
+
+However, this "New-IRP" may not be able to pass the conformance test that is based on "Old-version IRP specification" (see "test (should fail)" relation).
+Likewise, the "Old-IRP" should not be able to pass the conformance test that is based on "New-Version IRP specification".
+
+# Annex B (informative): Change history
+
+| Change history | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------|-------|-----------|-----|-----|--------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|---------------|
+| Date | TSG # | TSG Doc. | CR | Rev | Subject/Comment | Cat | Old | New |
+| Mar 2007 | SA_35 | SP-070065 | -- | -- | Submitted to TSG SA#35 for Information | -- | 1.0.0 | |
+| Jun 2007 | SA_36 | SP-070283 | -- | -- | Submitted to TSG SA#36 for Approval | -- | 2.0.0 | 7.0.0 |
+| Dec 2008 | SA_42 | -- | -- | -- | Upgrade to Release 8 | - | 7.0.0 | 8.0.0 |
+| Dec 2009 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-9 version (MCC) | - | 8.0.0 | 9.0.0 |
+| Mar 2010 | SA_47 | SP-100036 | 001 | -- | Introduction of SOAP SS | C | 9.0.0 | 10.0.0 |
+| 2012-09 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-11 version (MCC) | | 10.0.0 | 11.0.0 |
+| 2014-10 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-12 version (MCC) | | 11.0.0 | 12.0.0 |
+| 2016-01 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-13 version (MCC) | | 12.0.0 | 13.0.0 |
+| 2017-03 | SA#75 | - | - | - | Promotion to Release 14 without technical change | | 13.0.0 | 14.0.0 |
+
+| Change history | | | | | | | |
+|----------------|---------|------|----|-----|-----|--------------------------------|---------------|
+| Date | Meeting | TDoc | CR | Rev | Cat | Subject/Comment | New version |
+| 2018-06 | | | | | | Update to Rel-15 version (MCC) | 15.0.0 |
+| 2020-07 | - | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-16 version (MCC) | 16.0.0 |
+| 2022-03 | - | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-17 version (MCC) | 17.0.0 |
+| 2024-04 | - | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-18 version (MCC) | 18.0.0 |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/1eadbbe42cfcac5c0023577110aec5e3_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/1eadbbe42cfcac5c0023577110aec5e3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..735399a06d73c3a043710bded8b5cb07548ccc05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/1eadbbe42cfcac5c0023577110aec5e3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6a96e4a69ad406a0efe445436d1ebfa30d3aef3cad73f9750abb160b3b105386
+size 44366
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/2ba086df3506f81bae3a9b53725dcfea_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/2ba086df3506f81bae3a9b53725dcfea_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5311c8e39c5b8307cf528007f147868e71097f70
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/2ba086df3506f81bae3a9b53725dcfea_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:51fa24b943d11bc6cd75d4ee34f8aa2b65ffcd1596152b896d79cf1f283ba242
+size 18853
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b5eef52bd5febdd311709f2f538ca9c6cea1c447
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/5fb340ad68b0c71df0b56698b137e35b_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:446754ca0bb17b4a2a0587f9d84b96c00ae0c9961ee7235e36de0e0226045679
+size 9370
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..973a9f062e3e3ffb8e9d22a3bdc4e168ffce1fe6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/64662465bba247703fdec49c8f3309f9_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:90bc7f07da9debdc6628b36ad585905e430ac4370f3980c44c29f2f0fa839b2b
+size 6218
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/7f17c430b9598e4d748a8041457810b3_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/7f17c430b9598e4d748a8041457810b3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..56d58f9df7705868eb12934e074490b36b40ff30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/7f17c430b9598e4d748a8041457810b3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6e5045a27065f408664bc9f5126c4b361d8f434cd53979eeeb5ae933b59e7a37
+size 69481
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/99bae07626f60f9ede10e2e387ef7051_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/99bae07626f60f9ede10e2e387ef7051_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fd0ab333866ed84a27fba1be533bb71ee8393f73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/99bae07626f60f9ede10e2e387ef7051_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:cbadd550414d0d7635ab0bb2c21f68f196c3ea09da77ba24264c9fc42814e570
+size 23574
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/9b6b5924b48bf2fd5f347f88f06f45b3_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/9b6b5924b48bf2fd5f347f88f06f45b3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..88755553d382786761323a637c620d17d19f7a36
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/9b6b5924b48bf2fd5f347f88f06f45b3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:236dd0e46f09628ad0d2fbdf5dab462c9fe22d4e1c270a4f1e353f5e56848aea
+size 119592
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/fc69ceb1dee1da7e33bd6c38fc4ceab9_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/fc69ceb1dee1da7e33bd6c38fc4ceab9_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..749cd588ec76e3d3b5ae3498b2cdd418acf98549
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/fc69ceb1dee1da7e33bd6c38fc4ceab9_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:33e35a4d9816561a4924fa215bd4a42239645813743ac88d673d9e6b0aa13a17
+size 17829
diff --git a/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/raw.md b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4e71f624acf490c4348511aca3b1d8bcbf0ce97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-18/32_series/32302/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,951 @@
+
+
+# 3GPP TS 32.302 V18.0.0 (2024-04) ---
+
+*Technical Specification*
+
+## **3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Configuration Management (CM); Notification Integration Reference Point (IRP); Information Service (IS) (Release 18)**
+
+
+
+---
+
+The logo for 5G Advanced, featuring a stylized '5G' in black with a green signal wave icon above the 'G', and the word 'ADVANCED' in smaller black letters to the right.
+
+5G Advanced logo
+
+
+
+The 3GPP logo, featuring the letters '3GPP' in a stylized black font with a red signal wave icon below the 'G', and the text 'A GLOBAL INITIATIVE' in smaller black letters below the logo.
+
+3GPP logo
+
+## --- **Keywords**
+
+UMTS, management
+
+## **3GPP**
+
+## --- **Postal address**
+
+## --- **3GPP support office address**
+
+650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis
+Valbonne - FRANCE
+Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16
+
+## --- **Internet**
+
+
+
+## --- **Copyright Notification**
+
+No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.
+The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
+
+© 2024, 3GPP Organizational Partners (ARIB, ATIS, CCSA, ETSI, TSDSI, TTA, TTC).
+All rights reserved.
+
+UMTS™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its members
+3GPP™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
+LTE™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
+GSM® and the GSM logo are registered and owned by the GSM Association
+
+## Contents
+
+| | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| Foreword ..... | 5 |
+| Introduction ..... | 5 |
+| 1 Scope..... | 7 |
+| 2 References..... | 7 |
+| 3 Definitions and abbreviations ..... | 8 |
+| 3.1 Definitions..... | 8 |
+| 3.2 Abbreviations ..... | 8 |
+| 4 System overview ..... | 9 |
+| 4.1 System Context ..... | 9 |
+| 5 Information Object Classes..... | 9 |
+| 5.1 Imported information entities and local labels..... | 9 |
+| 5.2 Class Diagram ..... | 10 |
+| 5.2.1 Attributes and relationships..... | 10 |
+| 5.2.2 Inheritance ..... | 10 |
+| 5.3 Information object classes definition ..... | 11 |
+| 5.3.1 NtfSubscriber..... | 11 |
+| 5.3.1.1 Definition ..... | 11 |
+| 5.3.1.2 Attributes ..... | 11 |
+| 5.3.2 NtfSubscription..... | 11 |
+| 5.3.2.1 Definition ..... | 11 |
+| 5.3.2.2 Attributes ..... | 11 |
+| 5.3.2.3 State diagram ..... | 12 |
+| 5.3.3 NotificationIRP ..... | 12 |
+| 5.3.3.1 Definition ..... | 12 |
+| 5.4 Information relationship definitions..... | 13 |
+| 5.4.1 relation-ntfSubscriber-ntfSubscription (M)..... | 13 |
+| 5.4.1.1 Definition ..... | 13 |
+| 5.4.1.2 Roles ..... | 13 |
+| 5.4.1.3 Constraints ..... | 13 |
+| 5.4.2 relation-ntfIRP-ntfSubscriber (M)..... | 13 |
+| 5.4.2.1 Definition ..... | 13 |
+| 5.4.2.2 Roles ..... | 13 |
+| 5.4.2.3 Constraints ..... | 13 |
+| 5.5 Information attribute definitions ..... | 14 |
+| 5.5.1 Definitions and legal values ..... | 14 |
+| 5.5.2 Constraints..... | 14 |
+| 6 Interface Definition ..... | 15 |
+| 6.1 Class diagram representing interfaces..... | 15 |
+| 6.2 Generic rules ..... | 15 |
+| 6.3 notificationIRPManagement Interface (M)..... | 16 |
+| 6.3.1 Operation subscribe (M)..... | 16 |
+| 6.3.1.1 Definition ..... | 16 |
+| 6.3.1.2 Input parameters ..... | 16 |
+| 6.3.1.3 Output parameters..... | 16 |
+| 6.3.1.4 Pre-condition..... | 16 |
+| 6.3.1.5 Post-condition ..... | 17 |
+| 6.3.1.6 Exceptions..... | 17 |
+| 6.3.2 Operation unsubscribe (M)..... | 17 |
+| 6.3.2.1 Definition ..... | 17 |
+| 6.3.2.2 Input parameters ..... | 17 |
+| 6.3.2.3 Output parameters..... | 18 |
+| 6.3.2.4 Pre-condition..... | 18 |
+| 6.3.2.5 Post-condition ..... | 18 |
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|-----------|
+| 6.3.2.6 | Exceptions..... | 18 |
+| 6.4 | subscriberManagement Interface (O)..... | 18 |
+| 6.4.1 | Operation getSubscriptionIds (M) ..... | 18 |
+| 6.4.1.1 | Definition ..... | 18 |
+| 6.4.1.2 | Input parameters ..... | 18 |
+| 6.4.1.3 | Output parameters..... | 19 |
+| 6.4.1.4 | Pre-condition..... | 19 |
+| 6.4.1.5 | Post-condition ..... | 19 |
+| 6.4.1.6 | Exceptions..... | 19 |
+| 6.5 | subscriptionStatusOperations Interface (O) ..... | 19 |
+| 6.5.1 | Operation getSubscriptionStatus (M) ..... | 19 |
+| 6.5.1.1 | Definition ..... | 19 |
+| 6.5.1.2 | Input parameters ..... | 19 |
+| 6.5.1.3 | Output parameters..... | 20 |
+| 6.5.1.4 | Pre-condition..... | 20 |
+| 6.5.1.5 | Post-condition ..... | 20 |
+| 6.5.1.6 | Exceptions..... | 20 |
+| 6.6 | subscriptionFilterOperations Interface (O) ..... | 20 |
+| 6.6.1 | Operation changeSubscriptionFilter (M)..... | 20 |
+| 6.6.1.1 | Definition ..... | 20 |
+| 6.6.1.2 | Input parameters ..... | 20 |
+| 6.6.1.3 | Output parameters..... | 21 |
+| 6.6.1.4 | Pre-condition..... | 21 |
+| 6.6.1.5 | Post-condition ..... | 21 |
+| 6.6.1.6 | Exceptions..... | 21 |
+| 6.7 | subscriptionSuspendOperations Interface (O) ..... | 21 |
+| 6.7.1 | Operation suspendSubscription (M) ..... | 21 |
+| 6.7.1.1 | Definition ..... | 21 |
+| 6.7.1.2 | Input parameters ..... | 21 |
+| 6.7.1.3 | Output parameters..... | 21 |
+| 6.7.1.4 | Pre-condition..... | 22 |
+| 6.7.1.5 | Post-condition ..... | 22 |
+| 6.7.1.6 | Exceptions..... | 22 |
+| 6.7.2 | Operation resumeSubscription (M)..... | 22 |
+| 6.7.2.1 | Definition ..... | 22 |
+| 6.7.2.2 | Input parameters ..... | 22 |
+| 6.7.2.3 | Output parameters..... | 22 |
+| 6.7.2.4 | Pre-condition..... | 22 |
+| 6.7.2.5 | Post-condition ..... | 23 |
+| 6.7.2.6 | Exceptions..... | 23 |
+| 6.8 | IRPManagementOperations Interface (O) ..... | 24 |
+| 6.8.1 | Operation getNotificationCategories (M)..... | 24 |
+| 6.8.1.1 | Definition ..... | 24 |
+| 6.8.1.2 | Input parameters ..... | 24 |
+| 6.8.1.3 | Output parameters..... | 24 |
+| 6.8.1.4 | Pre-condition..... | 24 |
+| 6.8.1.5 | Post-condition ..... | 24 |
+| 6.8.1.6 | Exceptions..... | 24 |
+| 6.9 | NotificationIRPNotification Interface..... | 25 |
+| Annex A (informative): | Change history..... | 27 |
+
+# Foreword
+
+This Technical Specification (TS) has been produced by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).
+
+The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within the TSG and may change following formal TSG approval. Should the TSG modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by the TSG with an identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows:
+
+Version x.y.z
+
+where:
+
+- x the first digit:
+ - 1 presented to TSG for information;
+ - 2 presented to TSG for approval;
+ - 3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control.
+- y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections, updates, etc.
+- z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document.
+
+# Introduction
+
+The present document is part of a TS-family covering the 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; as identified below:
+
+- 32.301: Configuration Management (CM); Notification Integration Reference Point (IRP): Requirements
+- 32.302: Configuration Management (CM); Notification Integration Reference Point (IRP): Information Service (IS)**
+- 32.303: Configuration Management (CM); Notification Integration Reference Point (IRP): Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) Solution Set (SS)
+- 32.305: Configuration Management (CM); Notification Integration Reference Point (IRP): eXtensible Markup Language (XML) definition
+- 32.307: Configuration Management (CM); Notification Integration Reference Point (IRP): Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Solution Set (SS)
+
+The Itf-N interface is built up by a number of Integration Reference Points (IRPs) and a related Name Convention, which realise the functional capabilities over this interface. The basic structure of the IRPs is defined in 3GPP TS 32.101 [5] and 3GPP TS 32.102 [6].
+
+Network Elements (NEs) under management and element managers generate notifications of events about occurrences within the network. Different kinds of events carry different kinds of information. For instance a new alarm as specified in Alarm IRP: Information Service [1], is one possible kind of event, an object creation as specified in Basic CM IRP: Information Service [8] is another possible kind of event.
+
+Information of an event is carried in notification. An IRP Agent (typically an EM or a NE) emits notifications. IRP Manager (typically a network management system) receives notifications. The purpose of Notification IRP is to define an interface through which an IRP Manager can subscribe to IRP Agent for receiving notifications.
+
+This IRP bases its design on work captured in ITU-T Recommendation X.734 [2], OMG Notification Service [4]. The central design ideas are:
+
+- Separation of notification Consumers (IRP Managers) from Producers (IRP Agents);
+
+- Notifications are sent to IRPManagers without the need for IRPManagers to periodically check for new notifications.
+
+Common characteristics related to notifications in all other IRPs are gathered in one IRP.
+
+# 1 Scope
+
+The purpose of Notification IRP is to define an interface through which an IRPManager can subscribe to an IRPAgent for receiving notifications. The present document is the "Information Service" of Notification IRP. It defines, for the purpose of subscribing to an IRPAgent for receiving notifications, the information observable and controlled by management system's client and it also specifies the semantics of the interactions used to carry this information. It also defines the information common to all notifications which is called the notificationHeader.
+
+An IRPAgent supporting this IRP IS may emit one or multiple categories of notifications, such as alarms (as specified in Alarm IRP: Information Service [1]) and others. This IRP IS defines a mechanism that IRPManager can use to determine the categories of notifications supported by an IRPAgent. It also defines a mechanism (subscribe and unsubscribe operations) that IRPManager can use to specify the categories of notifications IRPAgent should emit to IRPManager during subscription. It also defines a mechanism (getSubscriptionIds operation) that IRPManager can use to check which categories of notifications it has subscribed to. IRPManager can set and change filter criteria applicable during the life-cycle of a subscription. IRPManager can also exercise flow-control on IRPAgent's emission of notifications (suspendSubscription and resumeSubscription operations).
+
+Using different managerReference, an IRPManager can subscribe several times. It will result in multiple subscriptions. As far as IRPAgent is concerned, notifications are sent to multiple "places".
+
+Using the same managerReference, an IRPManager can subscribe several times specifying different categories of notifications.
+
+This IRP IS does not specify information that is carried in some but not all notifications. That kind of information is specified in other IRP ISs involved. For example, *perceivedSeverity* is a piece of information specific for notifications carrying alarm information. This information is not defined in the present document but in Alarm IRP: Information Service [1].
+
+How IRPManager discovers the IRPAgent's address or reference (so that IRPManager can invoke an operation) is outside the scope of the present document.
+
+This IRP IS is aligned with ITU-T M.3702 [13] in terms of the definitions of operations for Notification management.
+
+# 2 References
+
+The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present document.
+
+- References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or non-specific.
+- For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.
+- For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document *in the same Release as the present document*.
+
+- [1] 3GPP TS 32.111-2: "Telecommunication management; Fault Management; Part 2: Alarm Integration Reference Point (IRP): Information Service (IS)".
+- [2] ITU-T Recommendation X.734 (1992): "Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Systems management: Event report management function".
+- [3] 3GPP TS 32.300: "Telecommunication management; Configuration Management (CM); Name convention for Managed Objects".
+- [4] Void
+- [5] 3GPP TS 32.101: "Telecommunication management; Principles and high level requirements".
+
+- [6] 3GPP TS 32.102: "Telecommunication management; Architecture".
+- [7] 3GPP TS 32.301: "Telecommunication management; Configuration Management (CM); Notification Integration Reference Point (IRP): Requirements".
+- [8] 3GPP TS 32.602: "Telecommunication management; Configuration Management (CM); Basic CM Integration Reference Point (IRP): Information Service (IS)".
+- [9] Void.
+- [10] 3GPP TS 32.312: "Telecommunication management; Generic Integration Reference Point (IRP) management: Information Service (IS)".
+- [11] 3GPP TS 32.311: "Telecommunication management; Generic Integration Reference Point (IRP) management: Requirements".
+- [12] 3GPP TS 32.150: "Telecommunication management; Integration Reference Point (IRP) Concept and definitions".
+- [13] ITU-T M.3702 (01/2012): "Telecommunication Management, Including TMN and Network Maintenance; Integrated services digital networks; Common management services – Notification management – Protocol neutral requirements and analysis".
+- [14] 3GPP TR 21.905: "Vocabulary for 3GPP Specifications".
+
+# --- 3 Definitions and abbreviations
+
+## 3.1 Definitions
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the terms and definitions given in 3GPP TR 21.905 [14], 3GPP TS 32.101 [5], 3GPP TS 32.102 [6] and 3GPP TS 32.301 [7] and the following apply. A term defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same term, if any, in 3GPP TR 21.905 [14], 3GPP TS 32.101 [5], 3GPP TS 32.102 [6] and 3GPP TS 32.301 [7].
+
+**IRP Agent:** See 3GPP TS 32.102 [6].
+
+**IRP Manager:** See 3GPP TS 32.102 [6].
+
+**event:** it is an occurrence that is of significance to network operators, the NEs under surveillance and network management applications
+
+Events can indicate many types of network management information, such as network alarms, network configuration change information and network performance data.
+
+**notification:** it refers to the transport of information regarding events from event producer to consumer (receiver)
+In this IRP, notification is used to carry information about network events from IRP Agent to IRP Manager. Producer sends notifications to consumers as soon as new events occur. Consumer does not need to check ("pull") for events.
+
+**IRP:** See 3GPP TS 32.102 [6].
+
+**notification category:** The semantics and syntax of the notification category string are identical to that defined for "IRP document version number string", see 3GPP TS 32.311 [11] subclause 3.1.
+
+**qualifiers:** the meaning of qualifiers for operations, parameters and information attributes (whether they are Mandatory(M)/ Conditional(C)/ Optional(O)) defined in the present (Information Service) document is provided in 3GPP TS 32.102 [6].
+
+Moreover, qualifiers of information attributes, when those information attributes are re-used in other IRP ISs, obey to the following rule: Mandatory and Conditional qualifiers of information attributes shall always be the same in other IRPs ISs, Optional qualifiers of information attributes may be set to either Optional or Mandatory in the other IRP ISs.
+
+## 3.2 Abbreviations
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the abbreviations given in 3GPP TR 21.905 [14] and the following apply. An abbreviation defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same abbreviation, if any, in 3GPP TR 21.905 [14].
+
+| | |
+|-----|--------------------------|
+| CM | Configuration Management |
+| DN | Distinguished Name |
+| IOC | Information Object Class |
+| NM | Network Manager |
+| SS | Solution Set |
+
+# 4 System overview
+
+## 4.1 System Context
+
+The general definition of the System Context for the present IRP is found in 3GPP TS 32.150 [12] subclause 4.7.
+
+In addition, the set of related IRP(s) relevant to the present IRP is shown in figure 1 and figure 2.
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating System Context A. On the left, a box labeled 'NM' contains 'IRPManager'. On the right, a box labeled 'EM' contains 'IRPAgent'. A solid line connects 'IRPManager' and 'IRPAgent', crossing a vertical dashed line labeled 'Itf-N'. To the right of 'IRPAgent', a dotted line connects to a box labeled 'NEs'. Below the dashed line, a curved arrow labeled 'Notification IRP' points towards the 'Itf-N' interface.
+
+Figure 1: System Context A
+
+Figure 1: System Context A
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating System Context B. On the left, a box labeled 'NM' contains 'IRPManager'. On the right, a box labeled 'NE' contains 'IRPAgent'. A solid line connects 'IRPManager' and 'IRPAgent', crossing a vertical dashed line labeled 'Itf-N'. Below the dashed line, a curved arrow labeled 'Notification IRP' points towards the 'Itf-N' interface.
+
+Figure 2: System Context B
+
+Figure 2: System Context B
+
+# 5 Information Object Classes
+
+## 5.1 Imported information entities and local labels
+
+| Label reference | Local label |
+|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
+| 3GPP TS 32.312 [10], Support IOC, ManagedGenericIRP | ManagedGenericIRP |
+
+## 5.2 Class Diagram
+
+### 5.2.1 Attributes and relationships
+
+This subclause depicts the set of Support IOCs that encapsulate information within the notification IRP. The intent is to identify the information required for the notification IRP implementation of its operations and notification emission. This subclause provides the overview of all Support IOCs in UML. Subsequent subclauses provide more detailed specification of various aspects of these Support IOCs.
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class NotificationIRP {
+ <>
+ }
+ class NtfSubscriber {
+ <>
+ }
+ class NtfSubscription {
+ <>
+ }
+ NotificationIRP "1" *-- "0..n" NtfSubscriber : +theNotificationIRP, relation-ntfIRP-ntfSubscriber
+ NtfSubscriber "1" -- "1..n" NtfSubscription : +theNtfSubscriber, +theNtfSubscription, relation-ntfSubscriber-ntfSubscription
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates three classes: **NotificationIRP**, **NtfSubscriber**, and **NtfSubscription**, all marked as **<>**. **NotificationIRP** has a composition relationship with **NtfSubscriber**, labeled **+theNotificationIRP** at the **NotificationIRP** end and **relation-ntfIRP-ntfSubscriber** for the association. The multiplicity is **1** at **NotificationIRP** and **0..n** at **NtfSubscriber**. **NtfSubscriber** has a bidirectional association with **NtfSubscription**, labeled **+theNtfSubscriber** at the **NtfSubscriber** end and **+theNtfSubscription** at the **NtfSubscription** end, with the association name **relation-ntfSubscriber-ntfSubscription**. The multiplicity is **1** at **NtfSubscriber** and **1..n** at **NtfSubscription**.
+
+UML Class Diagram showing relationships between NotificationIRP, NtfSubscriber, and NtfSubscription.
+
+### 5.2.2 Inheritance
+
+This subclause depicts the inheritance relationships that exist between Support IOCs.
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class ManagedGenericIRP {
+ <>
+ ManagedGenericIRP (from TS 32.312)
+ }
+ class NotificationIRP {
+ <